My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04-29-92 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1992
>
04-29-92 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:36:32 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:22:31 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP APRIL 29, 1992 4 <br />f Filla: Change paragraph 750.060 because it anticipates the <br />first statement would go out on or before March 5th so the <br />year of inception you may have to include a different time <br />that would be for the second and subsequent years. You would <br />probably prorate this fee for the first year. <br />The Council will review the requested information from the <br />City Engineer on Tuesday, May 5th, and then call a public <br />hearing. <br />OLD VILLAGE DRAINAGE DISCUSSION: <br />Filla: We are talking about a storm sewer improvement <br />district which we are creating because then you can levy ad <br />valorem taxes instead of special assessment. This works <br />well, but will not work on the agricultural land because <br />they get a break on taxes. When you calculate what kind of <br />money you expect to get back, you have to take that into <br />consideration. Prew: They are valued at $1000 per acre. <br />Filla: From a law standpoint it is impossible sometimes to <br />show economic benefit on a storm sewer improvement project. <br />If you use a storm sewer improvement district to finance <br />this instead of special assessments, we don't have to prove <br />it. We just notify the county of the cost and spread it <br />across the tax rolls like an ad valorem tax over a number of <br />years you chose to credit. <br />The City has to still discuss how they are going to <br />finance this project; sale of bonds, borrowed reserves, <br />because you will be front ending the money on this project. <br />The whole purpose of going with a storm sewer improvement <br />district is to avoid the pitfalls of 429. <br />Prew: MSA funds will pay 90 percent of the contract right <br />away. 100% for the street. 100% for the storm sewer on the <br />street and 25% of everything down the street. This will <br />leave the City with $80,000. <br />Filla: He will review a case in Shoreview that established <br />assessing 100 percent even if you get MSA funds. If we <br />can't use MSA funds and then assess everything in addition, <br />then we don't want to create a storm sewer improvement <br />district --we would want to use a 429. <br />Williams: I was thinking about using MSA funds and assessing <br />some by 429 and then use a taxing district to finance the <br />rest. <br />Mayor: I thought we would only be assessing for the street <br />and not for storm sewer. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.