My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-01-92 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1992
>
12-01-92 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:36:33 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:22:40 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
22
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 1, 1992 5 <br />Arlyn Christ, 8929 36th St. N., stated that in 1993 the park <br />bond will be taken off. If you include that as something <br />that has been required as a funding in the past, we no <br />longer need the funds, it seems the 32% increase is <br />extremely unconscionable recognizing that 5% more. You are <br />funding the future expenditures through reserve funds and <br />paying off an equipment certificate at an accelerated rate. <br />I'm not so sure if I am against the budget if that is what <br />we are trying to do, although I don't like the increase. To <br />sit here and say it is because of commercial taxes --it is <br />not at all. It is because we are paying off some equipment <br />certificates. <br />Wyn John, 8883 Jane Road N., stated Lake Elmo incurs a <br />certain amount of costs every year to run the city. If you <br />want it to stay as it is and maintain it as it is, there are <br />certain cost levels which the council has looked at <br />responsively and ended up with a total This total then gets <br />distributed to each household individually. The way the <br />total gets split may be considered unfair by you, <br />individually, which is something the council has very little <br />control over. We recognize that with I-94 we have an area <br />which is appropriate for commercial development. With the <br />appropriate commercial development coming across will not be <br />resisted any more strongly than we indicated during our <br />campaign. Everybody has told me during our door knocking to <br />keep Lake Elmo rural. This is one of our intentions, but at <br />the same time we have to be realistic and we are trying to <br />get a well balance tax base as we can easily manage. <br />Bob Eischen, 11674 Stillwater Blvd. N., stated his personal <br />feelings is that the large percentage increases reflected in <br />the budget is managing Lake Elmo rather than Lake Elmo is <br />managing the budget. Example given was the large increase <br />in the Public Works Department. This increase is out of <br />line with ordinary people in terms who live in ordinary <br />homes cannot understand. These projected increases did not <br />come overnight. They came with legislation and it looks like <br />we were not proactive, but reactive, which resulted in these <br />large increases. Can the Department Heads come up with a 5% <br />cut rather than a 100°% increase. We are looking at what is <br />absolutely minimally necessary. If this trend continues, <br />many of the people in this locality are going to be taxed <br />out of their homes. <br />M. Sarkissian, 8290 Hidden Bay Court, question the increase <br />for professional services for the city engineer and for the <br />recycling program. In Burnsville waste management agreed to <br />reycle the mass mailing (junk Mail) --Is Lake Elmo <br />considering doing this? Is there a way of considering a 5% <br />salary increase each year for two years? I suggest trying <br />to freeze the actual 1992 expenditures, use that as the <br />1993, and take the additional amounts and make them into <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.