Laserfiche WebLink
2. FUND THE SEWER LINE INDEPENDENTLY <br />FOR: <br />1. THE COUNCIL CAN ORDER THE PROJECT AND SAVE TIME. <br />2. LITIGATION WITH OAKDALE MAY BE AVOIDED? <br />3. ESTABLISHES A PROACTIVE SUPPORTIVE STANCE FOR <br />LANDOWNERS IN SECTION 32/339WHICH MAY ATTRACT <br />DEVELOPMENT. <br />4. AIDS THE SINGLE FAMILY HOMEOWNERS WHOSE SEPTIC <br />SYSTEMS ARE FAILING. A MATTER OF HEALTH, SAFETY <br />& WELFARE? <br />5. SEWER COULD BE SIZED TO SUIT FUTURE LAKE ELMO NEEDS. <br />6. SOME LANDOWNERS WOULD REQUEST RETURNING TO LAKE <br />ELMO. <br />AGAINST: <br />1. IT WOULD APPEAR TO BE AN ADVENTUROUS GAMBLE TO <br />LAKE ELMO RESIDENTS. <br />2. FUNDING COULD DRAMATICALLY INCREASE MIL RATE <br />UNTIL DEVELOPMENT OCCURRED. <br />3. WITH SLOW DEVELOPMENT, THERE WOULD BE GROWING <br />PRESSURE TO ENCOURAGE ANY DEVELOPER TO SETTLE. <br />4. OAKDALE WOULDN'T LIKE IT AND MAY OBSTRUCT THE <br />PROPOSAL, SO CAUSING DELAYS. <br />5. LAKE ELMO WOULD HAVE TO BE A PROACTIVE PARTNER IN <br />ATTRACTING THE RIGHT OPPORTUNITIES. WE DO NOT HAVE <br />THIS EXPERTISE. <br />