My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07-20-93 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1993
>
07-20-93 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 3:09:45 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:25:47 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
612 737 5101 <br />07/06/93 13:22 3M LSS MTLS RES LAB 201-2W-17 003 <br />Jung 29th Mg in$ -- Proposal idea cant. <br />L.E. It also creates an access to our parks that is much more safe than traveling the existing roads <br />shared by high speed vehicles. <br />Our proposal would create a landscape which would be characterized by an average size <br />road (regulation 24' wide to the current traffic studies) with a four foot shoulder on each side of <br />the 12' lanes, a curb on the eastern edge, and 10' open space to separate the vehicular traffic thorn <br />the pedestrians/recreational users, and an 8' wide trail. The 19 open space is our idea to physically <br />separate the traffic from the trail while leaving apace to plant trees or other vegetation as <br />secondary barriers from the road. The vegetation could block sound for the <br />pedestrians/recreational users, as well as for the homeowners adjacent to the road. Below is a <br />diagram of the proposed road in cross section; <br />As the the graphics show, our proposal would only require a space of 54' with only 32' of it paved, <br />while the past recommendation is for V of asphalt. Also remember the given amount of land that <br />is government owned is 64' wide. <br />Although our ideas are well thought out, there are still some questions we have left <br />unanswered about the proposed Jamaca Ave. as it turns the corner on it's Northern edge. We have <br />agreed that this area should reflect the existing road that has already been repaved as in the width <br />of the road and the shoulders, curbs, etc. We also have expressed concern over the amount of <br />land that must be used at this comer area. To reduce the loss of land to the adjacent owners, we <br />would like the paved trail to be moved closer to the roadway, therefore reduce the impact of the <br />trail to the landowners but still connecting the trail to the existing Posted Bike Path & Sunfish <br />Park. <br />NSjt Meetings Proposed Agenda <br />1. Congratulations on the passing of the proposal <br />2, Minutes from last meeting <br />3. Destination/Population discussion and approval <br />4. Acknowledgment of existing trails and their incorporation into our proposed network <br />5. Working Plan <br />6.Other <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.