Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Mary Kueffner <br />October 15, 1993 <br />Page 4 <br />Collyard property. If the City is of the opinion that people <br />should be allowed unlimited rights to drive over the "easement", <br />then the Collyards will demand that the City insure that no portion <br />of the travelled path cross Collyard property. If this is not <br />done, the Collyards will certainly consider filing a suit against <br />the City of Lake Elmo for an inverse condemnation. <br />It is the position of the Collyards that the Isle Avenue <br />North easement was deeded to the City for the lone purpose of <br />constructing a public road. The City has already indicated that it <br />has no interest in improving the easement into a public road. <br />Consequently, the Collyards believe that area should be vacated. <br />If Lake Elmo determines that it would like to improve Isle Avenue <br />North as a through street, the Collyards have no opposition to that <br />proposal. However, the road should be widened and improved to City <br />standards. It should also be maintained by the City. <br />In conclusion, the Collyards ask that the City Council <br />approve of the minor subdivision request as has been submitted. <br />The Collyards will also be back before this Council in the future <br />asking that the Isle Avenue easement be vacated. while we <br />understand that the vacation issue is not properly before the <br />Council at this time for a vote, the Collyards do want the City to <br />understand the full picture of what is going on here, as well as <br />understand the Collyards position in this matter. <br />I would appreciate it if you ovide a copy of this <br />letter to the Mayor and Council ers for the City so that they <br />will be apprised of the Col ardsI position wren they meet on <br />October 19, 1993. <br />Thank you fgx' your antiq#Ated c9dperation. <br />yours, <br />G. Galler <br />GGG:dmr <br />Enclosures <br />c: Danny & <br />