Laserfiche WebLink
Elevation 956. At Elevation 963, the additional storage meant more alum <br />would be needed, increasing the cost to $8,000. <br />Results of the sampling taken on May 4 were then presented. The pond <br />phosphorus levels ranged from 0.125 mg/L near the surface to 0.139 mg/L <br />at 5.6 meters depth. These compared with Olsen Lake total phosphorus of <br />0,020 to 0.022 mg/L for a similar depth range. Total dissolved phosphorus <br />for Olsen Lake Estates Pond was between .054 and .058 mg/L as against <br />0.009 mg/L for Olsen Lake. <br />The effect of not treating the water and discharging to Lake Olsen had been <br />discussed (Hal Lunke?) There was a strong possibility of a green algae bloom <br />occurring now in Lake Olsen or a blue green bloom in late summer. Based on <br />a mass balance between the pond and the lake, the phosphorus <br />concentration in Lake Olsen would increase from .020 mg/L to .026. With <br />treatment it would increase from .020 to .021 mg/L. Comparing Secchi disc <br />readings, at 20 mg/L water clarity would be 3.4 meters, at 26 it would be <br />1.8 meters. There would be no noticeable difference between 20 and 21 <br />mg/L. <br />President Zetterberg then proposed a motion: <br />1. To go ahead and treat the pond on May 7, and <br />2. To outlet the pond to Lake Olsen, but at no specific time - sometime during <br />the week of May 9, by which time they hoped to get the temporary <br />easement across Mr. Winkel's property. <br />This was subject of some discussion - on the gain for $8,000 expenditure, the <br />time for which the treatment would be effective, and the precedent to the <br />need for treating other bodies of water as the need arose. <br />The motion was passed 4/1 on a rollcall vote, Mr Moosebruegger voting <br />Against. 4 <br />Questions were raised by local residents, as well as comments to the effect <br />that when the level of 952 was reached, they would expect that the City of <br />Oakdale would correct the erosion and plant the vegetative mitigation. <br />Mayor Bearth indicated that Oakdale's position was that the pond was a <br />VBWD matter, to be resolved by them, as they had agreed to it. Oakdale <br />would comply with whatever they (VBWD) resolved to solve the technical <br />problem. <br />