My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-02-94 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
08-02-94 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:28:11 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
64
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Memo <br />To: Mayor and City Council <br />From: Mary Kueffner <br />Date: July 19, 1994 <br />Subject: Olson Lake Estates Pond <br />I spoke with Chuck Dayton about the upcoming public meeting scheduled for August 11. This <br />meeting is in response to our intervention in the VBWD temporary discharge permit requested <br />from the DNR. <br />Mr. Dayton has expressed the following thoughts to me regarding this permit and the public <br />hearing: <br />• Do we want to provide "expert testimony," such as a limnologist to discuss the impact of <br />the discharge on Olson Lake? <br />• Mr, Dayton suggested that we have a court reporter at the meeting. The reporter can <br />report the meeting, but not transcribe it unless we need it at a future date. I have checked <br />with Logal & Styrbicki Court Reporting Services in St. Paul. Their charges are $35.00 per <br />hour. If we want the testimony transcribed, the cost is $4.60 per page. Northwestern Court <br />Reporters in Hudson charges $30.o0 per hour, and $2.55 per page of transcript. They also <br />charge $7.50 per hour for travel time. <br />• Mr. Dayton has also suggested we have someone from the MPCA speak to the water <br />quality Issue. That may be an option to look at rather than paying for a limnologist. <br />•The DNR (permitting agency) has delegated this public hearing to the Valley Branch <br />Watershed, despite our objections. The public hearing is scheduled from 6:00 p.m. to 7:00 <br />P.m. on Thursday, August 11, 1994, prior to the regular VBWD meeting. <br />I have talked with Peter Zetterburg about this hearing. He feels the hearing is unnecessary for <br />the temporary permit, and the City should be concentrating on VBWD's Plan Amendment that <br />shows options for permanent solutions to the issues we have raised. <br />I talked with Randy Peterson of Barr Engineering today. They will be taking water samples of <br />both the Pond and the Lake tomorrow. The results of the testing they have done to date are <br />shown on the attached exhibits. <br />On 5-4-94, prior to alum treatment, the phosphorus lever of the Pond was 125. The levels after <br />treatment were 5-9-94 - 36 ug/L; 5-13-94 -28 ug/L; 5-20-94 - 54 ug/L; and 6-9-94 - 65 ug/L. <br />The Lake was tested on these same dates. Their phosphorus levels were: 5-4 - 20 ug/L; 5-20- <br />94 - 23 ug/L; (North end) 19 ug/L (South end); 6-9-94 - uug/L (North end) 13 ug/L (South end). <br />fri <br />Do we want to spend the money to intervene in a temporary permit is the questions we should <br />ask ourselves, or do we want to make sure that the long term solution is implemented into <br />VBWD's Plan. The temporary permit expires in August of 1995. If you chose to not intervene in <br />the temporary permit, (even though we have already done so) we could ask the DNR for a <br />guarantee that the final permit would not be an extension of the current temporary permit, but <br />rather a whole new process starts with input from the public not only allowed, but encouraged. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.