Laserfiche WebLink
Historical chlorophyll data suggest the take's algal blooms are somewhat greater than <br />would be expected for the lake's phosphorus concentration. The long term growing season <br />chlorophyll a concentration from the lake's epilimnion (11.5 mg/m') is approximately half of <br />the most recent summer average (19.6 mg/m3 in 1991). The data indicate the lake is <br />responding to its nutrient load by experiencing more algal blooms than expected. As shown <br />in Figure 4-13, growing season mean chlorophyll concentrations were generally within the <br />mesotrophic category during the period of record (1971-1991). Exceptions occurred during <br />1984, 1987, and 1991 when the mean was within the eutrophic category. This simply means <br />that the average level of algal blooms noted in the lake have generally been moderate, but have <br />been at an undesirable level in recent years. However, algicide treatment in 1990 reduced the <br />algal blooms to a moderate level. <br />Even though the historical data suggest the lake's water transparency has been good, the <br />lake experiences water quality problems during the late summer period, as noted earlier. <br />During the period 1971 through 1992, the average growing season water transparency remained <br />within the mesotrophic category. These data suggest the lake had relatively good water <br />transparency throughout the period of record. However, the average fails to depict the annual <br />decline in water transparency, which results in a public perception of undesirable water <br />transparency by late summer. As mentioned previously, treatment by an algicide during 1989 <br />and 1990 may have improved the late summer water clarity somewhat. <br />Problems with aquatic vegetation in recent years necessitated chemical treatment in <br />private beach areas around the lake. The lake was chemically treated to control weeds during <br />1989 through 1993. Specifically, an area that included 2,985 feet of shore and extending <br />approximately 150 feet from shore was chemically treated. This is 10% of the littoral area, <br />which is the maximum allowed by the DNR. Treatment was completed by a professional, and <br />coordinated by the Lake Jane Association. <br />4.2.9.5 Public Use and Related Water Quality Concerns <br />Lake Jane is very heavily used for a wide variety of recreational uses. Uses during the <br />ice -free period include swimming, fishing, boating (speedboats, canoes, pontoons, and fishing <br />boats), waterskiing, and passive uses by.lake residents. During the winter months the lake is <br />used for ice fishing, ice skating, and snowmobiling. <br />A public boat access wasconstructedalong the south shore of Lake Jane in the fall of <br />1980. The number of individuals accessing the lake is limited, however, by the 10 parking <br />spaces in the public access. A DNR recreational survey completed in 1980 indicated fishing <br />pressure in the lake was 38.71 angler -hours per acre, which is near the Metro Region median. <br />Boat anglers comprised approximately two-thirds of all anglers. It is likely that the recreational <br />survey was completed prior to the completion of the boat access. <br />The Tri-Lakes Association is a local organization which is interested in preserving and <br />improving water quality. It consists of residents .of Lake Jane, Lake Olson, and Lake <br />DeMontreville. <br />Although Lake Jane does not have a public swimming beach, the lake is heavily used for <br />swimming. Residents have private swimming beaches, which receive heavy usage during the <br />summer months. Swimming lessons are offered at the lake each summer, and from 30 to 60 <br />individuals generally participate. <br />A large amount of open space is located along the shoreline, and is expected to remain <br />undeveloped because of wetlands, etc. A large number of wildlife and waterfowl have made <br />23\82\045\SEC4.RPT\KMH 33 DRAFT: June 23, 1994 <br />