My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-06-94 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
09-06-94 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:28:12 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
33
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
River Valley Church <br />August 26, 1994 <br />page 4 <br />The City Planner followed up with a phone call to WDOT on August 8. IV1nDOT staff <br />explained that the TH. 36 Access Plan is a long-range, conceptual plan to provide <br />guidance for the time when congestion on TH 36 must be addressed. MnDOT has not <br />programmed any construction of interchange ramps at the subject intersection. The <br />intention of the plan is that the affected communities would address the highway access <br />needs in their comprehensive plans. To date, the issue of the preferred interchange design <br />is not resolved in the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. A meeting is scheduled in late <br />August at the Lake Elmo City Hail to discuss the TH 36 plan. <br />Thus, at this time, there are no current access ramp plans that would impede the River <br />Valley Church project. <br />Landscaninp: Site and building plan review requirements include a landscaping plan with <br />specified components. The landscaping plan submitted is minimal. The submittal should <br />include at least a cost estimate of the landscaping before final construction permits are <br />granted. The value of the landscaping must meet the minimum percentage of the total <br />project value. <br />The site currently is wooded along the property border formed by the TH 36 right-of-way. <br />A number of trees will be lost to the project. It is suggested that the minimum number of <br />trees should be affected. <br />RECOMMENDATION <br />It is recommended that Site and Building Plan Review be approved contingent upon the <br />following items being corrected or submitted and approved: <br />1. The easement issues must be clarified. This should include: <br />a) Applicant must submit a certificate of survey from a registered land surveyor. This <br />can be required before a building permit is granted and is an appropriate means of <br />resolving the easement issue for site plan approval. <br />b) Applicant must verify if any other easement exists on the property besides the NSP <br />easement. This should be included in the certificate of survey. <br />c) Applicant must supply proof of permission from NSP for construction in the NSP <br />easement. <br />2. The location of the parking lot on the property must be verified and consistent on all <br />plans. <br />3. _Parking stalls must be 10' x 20' according to the parking code. <br />4. Planting islands that cover 10% of the parking area must be included. <br />4. Access permits, if necessary, from Washington County must be obtained for the access <br />drive. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.