My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-01-94 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1994
>
11-01-94 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:51:18 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:28:13 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING NOVEMBER 1, 1994 4 <br />and with depleting resources, recycling concrete or asphalt is needed to keep costs <br />down said Voss, who has drafted the revision to the zoning ordinance. <br />Councilman Mottaz stated in Lake Elmo we pride ourselves in recycling and thought the <br />proposed ordinance to permit recycling as an overlay to an existing mining operation <br />was appropriate. <br />Council member Conlin stated the city does not have the resources to enforce this <br />ordinance and there are too many holes in it. The Hammes CUP was out of <br />compliance and this is their effort to put them in compliance. She felt the city should be <br />consistent because there are circumstances with other ordinances where we have <br />stuck to the rules. She could not support this proposed concept which she considers a <br />transfer station. She would like the PZ to look at other ordinances relating to recycling <br />besides this one presented to them in their investigation. <br />Council member Johnston felt the citizens had the right to take action to take care of <br />the city's concerns. <br />M/S/P Mottaz/Johnson - upon receipt of an application, the Planning Commission will <br />be directed to hold a public hearing on the proposed ordinance to permit recycling as <br />an overlay to an existing mining operation. (Motion passed 4-1:Conlin: The motion was <br />unnecessary that what we are looking at was a concept and she does not approve of <br />the concept. ) <br />B. Negotiations with Oakdale <br />Mayor John explained the mayor and city administrator of Oakdale need a response <br />from council if it would support a proposal for exchanging the land north of 4th Street <br />that is Mn/DOT property and part of the Oakdale golf course (current proposal for golf <br />course is outside the MUSA) for all properties south of 4th Street and east of the <br />western boundary of the Mn/DOT property to be in Lake Elmo. This land which lies <br />outside the MUSA stays in Oakdale provided we can pick up MUSA land in Lake Elmo. <br />Alternatively, we can look at all land east of Ideal and south of 4th Street. The <br />advantage to this is that Ideal Avenue forms a straight line demarcation between the <br />cities so that we do not run into demarcation disputes on curved boundaries that are <br />difficult to survey. <br />Attorney Filla indicated if we can service directly or indirectly a larger area then it <br />becomes more economical for the city to initiate the project. We could have a <br />temporary agreement with Oakdale that they would provide sewer service because we <br />would own the sewer lines and we would take them over in the future and also serve <br />the properties on the east side of Cty. Rd 13 which depends upon enlargement of the <br />downstream interceptor. There is a way to provide sewer facilities to those residents, <br />but it would probably mean that the city would have to front end some of the costs until <br />we could extend the sewer to the east. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.