My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-17-95 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1995
>
10-17-95 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 2:28:41 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:30:04 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 17, 1995 <br />D. Resolution No. 95-53 approving detached garage to be placed closer to front property line than <br />primary structure. <br />Philip Tschumperlin, 9149 Lake Jane Trail, is requesting permission to place a detached garage closer to <br />the front property line than the main structure. As per our City Ordinance, Section 301.130 C.9., a <br />resolution and approval by adjacent property owners is required. <br />Letters were received from Carl Olinger, 9095 Lake Jane Trail N. and Mildred Thurmes, 9189 Lake Jane <br />Trail, stating they are in agreement and approval of the proposed site plan and building location for <br />proposed garage construction at 9149 Lake Jane Trail N. <br />M/S/P Coniin/DeLapp - to adopt Resolution No. 95-53, A Resolution allowing Philip Tschumperlin, 9149 <br />Lake Jane Trail, an accessory structure to be located between the public road and the principal road <br />(Motion passed 3-0). <br />E. Present Status Report on the Browns Creek Water Management Organization <br />Planner Terwedo reported due to circumstances the Browns Creek W.M.O. is amending its joint powers <br />agreement to add capital improvement projects. Due to issues regarding the future impacts of <br />development on Browns Creek, a designated trout stream, the W.M.O. is considering methods to <br />preserve the wetland. <br />7. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: <br />A. Public Hearing: Assessments for Street Improvements <br />The Public Hearing notice was published in the October 2,1995 Stillwater Gazette and the October 11, <br />1995 Stillwater Gazette Extra. <br />Acting Mayor Johnston opened up the public hearing at 8:06 p.m. and all affected property owners were <br />notified. <br />City Engineer Larry Bohrer explained the 1995 Bituminous Overlay Project consisted of nine separate <br />streets and used overheads to go over each improvement project. In accordance with the policy begun in <br />1993, 90% of the cost of the overlay is assessed to abutting property. 10% of the overlay cost is paid for <br />by the City in recognition that the improved street is a general benefit to the entire City. The city also <br />pays for any patching or crack sealing that needs to be done prior to the overlay and any assessment for <br />city -owned property such as parks. <br />42nd Street from Jamaca Avenue to Lake Jane Trail:Total cost: $23,996 Assessed Cost: $21,696 <br />City Cost: $2,400 Assessable Unit: 21 Assessment Rate: $1,028.38 <br />Steve Tkachuck, 8670 42nd Street N., when the water system was installed a couple years ago there <br />was a lot of damage to the street that doesn't seem to be assessed to that company. How is this handled <br />by the city? If they are not assessed for part of that damage, someone is in breach of their duty for not <br />going back for damages to city property. <br />Larry Bohrer:When the water main was installed, it came from Lake Jane Trail generally along the south <br />side of the street. There were two cuts made in the road at the time. The watermain passed over to the <br />north side where it was installed in the blvd. of 42nd street and another cut made at the cul-de-sac to get <br />that pipe to the south. There were two road patches in these particular areas. This comment came up at <br />the improvement hearing in March and what we believe the comments were at that time is that the road <br />patches were settling or not done right. We went out and looked at and photographed the areas. In our <br />opinion, the patching was done correctly. There were other comments later on that said construction <br />traffic caused damage. He had looked at the road and saw areas either the city had done some <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.