My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
01-6-98 CCM
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
City Council - Final Meeting Minutes
>
1990's
>
1998
>
01-6-98 CCM
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/29/2025 1:01:36 PM
Creation date
10/2/2019 8:40:55 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL 1 t,iQTE.S' JANUARY 6, 1998 <br />B. Traffic Signal at TH5 and CR15 <br />Tom Prew reported in his memo dated December 29,1997 that he has received a letter from MnDOT <br />informing the City that the signal system at the intersection of TH5 and CSAH 15 will be constructed this <br />Spring. An agreement for the cost of the signal system between MnDOT, Washington County, and the <br />City of Lake Elmo is necessary. For this signal system, Lake Elmo's only cost will be for the electricity to <br />power the system and the cost is estimated at $700 per year. However, the cost may be lower since light <br />emitting diodes (LED's) will be used instead of standard bulbs. Prew has reviewed the construction plans <br />for the intersection. Some median islands and restriping will be done to provide for better turning and <br />driving lanes. <br />Council member Dunn had called Washington County and received a cost for electricity of $1,50042,000 <br />per year. Administrator Kueffner received a cost figure of $1,00041,400 per year from Don Theisen. <br />Council member DeLapp suggested that the lights be hooded, and that MnDOT is made aware of the City's <br />new lighting standards. The City should also put a cap on what they would pay for the electrical cost of the <br />signal. The question was raised if Cennex would share the cost of the signal light? <br />M/S/P Hunt/DeLapp - to direct the staff to request a formal itemized estimate in writing the costs incurred <br />by Lake Elmo and solicit an agreement that all lighting in this area of TH5 and CSAH 15 will be in <br />accordance with Lake Elmo City regulations. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />C. Ordinance & Summary Ordinance adding Section 720 Wetland Treatment Systems <br />Tom Prow submitted a new draft of the Wetland Treatment Ordinance. He has changed the setback <br />requirements to reduce the setbacks for smaller systems. He also included an annual fee to be paid by the <br />system owner to the City. This fee will cover the City costs for review of the monitoring results and <br />general administration costs to keep track of these systems. <br />M/S/P Hunt/Dunn — to adopt Ordinance No. 9722, as amended, (Page 1 - 720.03 Rules, Subd. 2 Location <br />of Systems, A. Setbacks; last paragraph ....... considered reasonable based on the City Engineer's <br />recommendation for the site and the neighboring properties), An Ordinance adding Section 720 Alternative <br />Waste Disposal System — Wetland Treatment System to the 1997 Lake Elmo Municipal Code. (Motion <br />passed 5-0). <br />M/S/P Hunt/Conlin — to adopt the Summary of Ordinance No. 9722 Relating to Alternative Waste Disposal <br />Systems Wetland Treatment Systems. (Motion passed 5-0). <br />Council member Conlin asked who is the City Representative referred to that would be present for all <br />treatment cell testing. She wanted to make sure that the representative is a qualified person. Tom Prew <br />responded that it would be him and thought Jim McNamara, Building Official, could do some testing. <br />7. MAINTENANCE/PARKS/FIRE: <br />8. PLANNING, LAND USE AND ZONING: <br />A. Final Plat — Prairie Hamlet <br />City Planner Terwedo reported on April 15, 1997, the City Council approved the preliminary plat and plan <br />for Prairie Hamlet. This plat was one of the original development plans prepared following the OP, Open <br />Space Development Regulations. The landscape plan, final plat, wetland treatment plan and developer's <br />agreement was submitted for Council review. Tom Prow reviewed the final submittals and offered <br />comments in his memo dated December 31, 1997. City Planner Terwedo reviewed the landscape plan and <br />found it to be consistent with the preliminary plat. The in -lieu park fee was lowered to $14,700 from <br />$15,540, as stated in the City Planner's Report, based on cost per acre provided by Assessor, Frank Langer. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JANUARY 6, 1998 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.