Laserfiche WebLink
7. MAINTENANCE, PARKS, FIRE, BUILDING <br />7.A Report on Clean-up Days <br />Administrator Kueffner reviewed her report and said the general response to 1998's clean-up day was <br />positive. <br />7.11 Building Official's Attendance at National Conference. <br />Jim McNamara requested Council approval for the September 6-12, 1998 building conference in San <br />Diego, California at a cost of $1,200.00. He said some of the agenda will include changes in the Uniform <br />Building Code, changes in the International Building Code and educational updates. <br />Councilmember DeLapp questioned the claim for Jim Arend, who covers for Jim McNamara. <br />M/S/P Johnston/Hunt — to approve the Building Official's attendance at the 1998 National Building <br />Official's conference at a cost not to exceed $1,200.00, conditioned upon an update of the <br />conference be provided to the Council. <br />(Motion Passed 5-0). <br />8. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING <br />&A Rezone from RR to OP: Zintl Property <br />City Planner Dillerud described the site location and said the Planning Commission failed to file a report <br />to the City Council. Councilmember Hunt said the findings support rezoning this parcel. Mayor John <br />said it was the responsibility of the Council to ensure that changes in land use within the City are <br />consistent with the visions and goals outlined in the City's Comprehensive Plan. With that aim in view, <br />the Council designated certain areas as Open Space within the Future Land Use Plan. This designation <br />did not study individual land parcels for suitability, as individual proposals placed before the Council <br />could cover more than one parcel of land. Then, deficiencies in one parcel might be turned into an <br />advantage when blended with another. The OP designation is an overall designation with the expectation <br />that adjacent pieces of property are consistent with one another, and form a coherent whole when fully <br />developed. <br />City Attorney Filla said there are specific regulations to compliance to the Comprehensive Plan that the <br />courts view. Cities must be able to give clear, reasonable actions, and it is not necessarily true that all <br />land must be rezoned. If the City does not choose to rezone, the burden is strongly on the City to give <br />those reasons. The City of Lake Elmo has deemed this property OP, which is consistent with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. If the City does not approve the rezone to OP, the court may suggest the Council is <br />acting in an arbitrary manner. Said cities are required to bring zoning in compliance with the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Said the concept plan may be objectionable, but it does comply with the Ordinance. <br />M/S/P Hunt/Johnston — to adopt Ordinance No. 97-32, An Ordinance Amending Section 300.07 <br />"Zoning District Map" of the 1998 Lake Elmo Municipal Code. Section 1. Amendment: to rezone <br />the Zintl property from (RR) Rural Residential to (OP) Open Space Preservation District. <br />(Motion Passed 4-1). Opposed: Dunn; has a problem with the OP Ordinance in general, and thinks <br />it needs to be reviewed. <br />&B Concept Plan for the Zintl Property <br />City Planner Dillerud reviewed the concept plan and presented 2 Resolutions, one approving the plan and <br />one denying approval of the concept plan. Said several residents of the area have testified that areas of <br />the site along the west and north perimeter have been subject to periodic surface flooding; several house <br />pads for the lots on the east side of the public street will fall within 200 feet of the adjacent development <br />(Fields), the park proposed for the west -central portion of the site is a bit small; the City Park proposed is <br />City of Lake Elmo Council Meeting Tuesday, July 7, 1998 <br />Page 5 <br />