Laserfiche WebLink
DOHERTY <br />RUMBLE <br />& BUTLER <br />PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION <br />City of Lake Elmo <br />April 20, 1999 <br />Page 5 <br />residential districts. Even the business park zone, which has a 20 acre minimum plat size requirement, <br />requires only a 150 foot buffer. <br />There is no rational basis for imposing twice the buffer requirement on religious uses as on <br />general business uses. The buffer requirements should be modified to a 150 foot building setback <br />requirement and a 50 foot parking and driveway area requirement. <br />The amendment proposed by the Planning Commission, allowing the buffer to be outside of <br />the 15 acre maximum parcel size, but only if on a separate tax parcel, contiguous to the principal <br />parcel, and encumbered by a perpetual easement prohibiting development and legal combination with <br />any other parcel, is an unconstitutional taking of property, and a blatant attempt to require churches <br />to pay taxes on church owned property required to meet the buffer requirement. This provision, <br />perhaps even more than the maximum lot size, illustrates the intent of the proposed ordinance to <br />impose unconstitutional restrictions and requirements on the development of new churches in the City <br />of Lake Elmo. <br />4. The 35% limitation on impervious surface is also an unreasonable restriction designed to <br />make it impossible to develop a church use. <br />The 35% impervious surface limitation is also not supported by any rational basis. Nothing <br />even close to 65% pervious surface is necessary for surface water management and virtually all <br />existing, developed PF sites in the City substantially exceed the 35% requirement. Once again, <br />comparison to existing standards for other uses is illustrative. The maximum impervious surface <br />allowed in the business park zone is 75%. There is no basis for a requirement that is more than twice <br />as severe on churches. The churches have previously proposed that the impervious surface restriction <br />be increased to a minimum of 50%. <br />5. The proposed ordinance unconstitutionally prohibits the expansion of existing churches in <br />Lake Elmo. <br />As noted above, 25 of 26 sites currently zoned PF or P in the City are occupied by existing <br />uses. It is believed that every one of these sites (with the possible exception of the cemetery and the <br />parks) does not comply with the requirements of the proposed PF-Ordinance. Eleven of the 26 sites <br />exceed the maximum lot size; and the remaining developed parcels, including all of the existing <br />churches in the City of Lake Elmo, violate one or more of the setback, buffer and/or impervious <br />surface requirements. <br />The Planning Commission's response to an ordinance which renders every existing PF site in <br />the City nonconforming was to amend the ordinance to state that existing uses "may continue such <br />use as a conforming use without a conditional use permit." However, the impact of this amendment <br />MumoG 588883.1 <br />