Laserfiche WebLink
SENT BY:DPRA St.Paul, MN <br />L. <br />C. <br />12-39 ; 9:35AM 612 227 5y522-^ 612 407 413141-1 <br />e0a <br />CLUSTER 6U31?1V1510N s .� <br />Site area = 20 scree <br />1/4 acre late <br />Density =1.45 DU/Acro <br />Total impervioua 6urfacii = 10.7% (2.14 acres) <br />Lz* imperviouo aurfaoo = 14% <br />Deslgnated open apace = 10 acres <br />Read length = 2.127 feet (2Z width) <br />FIGURE S. Clustering reduces overall site imperviousness. <br />Saatra; John Alesopaulos, University of Connecticut <br />feet of office floor space is often almost twice what is <br />actually needed. Using a generic, medium-sized office <br />building as a hypothetical example, he shows chat a <br />typical parking supply ratio of 3.8 results in an extra <br />55,000 square feet of parking lot, compared to using a <br />more factually -based ratio of 2.5. <br />The City of Olympia found not only parking over. <br />supply, with vacancy races of 60-70%, buc also devel. <br />opers consistently building parking above minimum <br />ratios, with 51% more parking spaces at their 15 survey <br />sites Chan were required by zoning (City of Olympia <br />1994e). This agrees with our observation char, at least <br />in Connecticut, overbuilding of parking appears co be <br />a recent trend with "big box" retail score developers, <br />who typically require at least 5 spaces per 1,000 square <br />feet, principally to meet peak demands on weekends <br />and during the busy period from Thanksgiving to <br />Christmas. <br />Reductions in parking -related impervious cover- <br />APA JOURNAL- SPRING 1996 <br />STANDARD SU13DIV15ION <br />Site area = 20 acres <br />1/2 acre loe5 <br />Density _ 1.45 DU/Acro <br />Total Impervious surface - 17.5% (3.5 acres) <br />Lot lmpeMoue surface=13,71: <br />Deolgnated open space = 2.6 acres <br />Road length = 2+390 feet (W width) <br />age can be acraincd in ways other than adjusring pn rk <br />ing supply ratios. Shoop (1995) suggests that parkin}; <br />can be reduced through economic incentives char rt <br />feccively end the subsidy provided by employer-poi.l <br />parking. Employee commuter option programs, man <br />dated by the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990 in <br />areas of "severe nonatrainmene for ozone standar.l,.. <br />hold some promise for reducing parking demand. I'I i. <br />Olympia study (City of Olympia 1994d) coaduth,l <br />that sharing, joining, or coordinating parking facilil ie- . <br />can reduce parking significandy, Finally, verrical goi <br />ages (above or below ground) can be encouraged, al <br />though rhis alternative can be expensive. Many ..I <br />these strategies were recently combined in an innov.j <br />tive office park design in Lacey, Washington, where 11 . <br />new 360,000-square-foot headquarters of the state Du <br />partment of Ecology was designed around a "parkir.q, <br />diet" chat slashed parking spaces from 1500 to 7.w <br />(Uncermann 1995). <br />