Laserfiche WebLink
M/S/P Siedow/Hunt — to direct the staff to proceed based on the Village Commission's recommendation <br />that the City support the concept of relocation of the storage buildings to the east, and that Steve Johnson <br />work with the Village Commission on design guidelines. In the future the City Planner and Attorney will <br />address technical concerns, (Motion passed 4-1:DeLapp: Agreed with the City Administrator that time be <br />given to finish the comp plan to see if this concept fits into the plan.). <br />NOTE: Refer to August 17,1999 City Council minutes for discussion on the above motion. <br />F. United Properties — Eagle Point Business Park PUD Plan <br />Dale Glowa, United Properties, indicated that a PUD agreement is a long-term relationship with the City. <br />United is developing a special work environment. He reviewed the definitions of office showroom that <br />would not allow HDR. He said the definition is so restrictive that he doubted any business would come to <br />Lake Elmo. Their market does not view any difference between R&D and office showroom. It's <br />flexspace. <br />The following discussion describes the general consensus of the City Council: <br />Office Research and Office Showroom in a Combined Definition: <br />Predominantly office oriented service with some backroom assemblage, ceiling height not to exceed 20' <br />height to accommodate mezzanine, significant entry lobby. Require limiting the number of docks. The <br />intent is not to shut off a professional office building that may have customers. The proposal was to allow <br />Research & Development/Office Showroom as a permitted use recommended by the Planning <br />Commission. <br />Siedow: Permitted use. <br />DeLapp: Permitted use because we will see it in the site plan. Anytime you address a mezzanine, you have <br />to address parking and the number of bathrooms. <br />Armstrong: Permitted use. Uses by appointment and require very few parking spaces. <br />Dunn: Permitted use. The 20' ceiling height is needed for the pilot plant in HDR. <br />Hunt: Permitted use. <br />Council Consensus: Don't want warehousing, distribution or retail. Atriums and foyers are architectural <br />elements. Questions if Real Estate is an office use or a retail operation. The City Planner will amend <br />definitions based on Council discussion. <br />Gasoline/Convenience Center: <br />Dunn, DeLapp, Armstrong, Hunt: NOT permitted or conditioned —gas stations mainly serve the travelling <br />public, typically 24 hour usage, high lighting, fair amount of traffic, site safety issues, and sign issues. This <br />area is too valuable to squander on a truck stop/gas station. <br />Hunt: For the convenience of Business Park tenants we do allow limited retail,... hi support of Business <br />Park areas, defined as coffee shops, day care, business services; example Kinko <br />Planner Dillerud: If a classic design came in for gasoline service, than what the City is concerned about <br />could be addressed. A PUD agreement can be amended. <br />Hotel/Restaurant: <br />DeLapp: Code requires integrated planning and architecture. The designed hotel and restaurant are <br />advertising in itself and not integrated in an overall Business Park. Need a limitation on a number of hotels <br />and restaurants. If it is an integral part of the office development park and enhances the operations that are <br />there and not serve the travelling public, this is what he would want through concept of a PUD. <br />Dunn: No problem with hotel and restaurant separated. <br />Siedow: No Motel 6, otherwise no problem with separated hotel and restaurant. <br />Hunt: No problem with hotel and restaurant separated. No problem with a theme restaurant. Hotel should <br />be compatible with the area. <br />Armstrong: accept hotel and restaurant, separated, if architecturally compatible. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 1999 <br />