07-20-99 CCM - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Signa¢e: Planner Dillerud made the Council aware that what appeared on the master sign plan is not necessarily the way the signs will appear in coloration. Dale Glowa: It is the intent of the developer to have franchise type signs. Project signs could be used to introduce corporate colors and logo. Every tenant has to comply with the shape and size of signs. Signs must be visible. Each company shows their colors. There are no neon lights. Black by day and white at night. Armstrong, DeLapp: NO pylon signs permitted. Dunn, Sideow: Permit pylon sign. Dunn: Hopefully the pylon sign does not have to be used. Height only for limited uses, colors. DeLapp: Concern on residents seeing signs from Inwood Avenue. Hunt: Favors pylon signs, integrally designed. May have corporate logo. Shoreland Regulations: Dunn: Concern with the DNR protected creek running through property. Planner Dillerud: The main creek corridor is DNR protected. It is listed as a tributary stream in our zoning code in shoreland regulations. Shoreland standards apply within 300'. Impervious surface coverage is reduced form 75% to 35% on those sites that back up to the creek. Developer has to get a DNR permit to alter the wetland. Developer has to design site to accommodate state -mandated legislation and carrot vary them through the PUD Ordinance. Traffic Signals on Hudson Blvd/Inwood Avenue: Planner Dillerud explained the signal lights on a county road are paid half by the City and half by the County. The developer will pick up the cost of the City's share. At Hudson Road and Inwood Avenue, Washington County pays one-half, Oakdale one -quarter, and Lake Elmo one -quarter. Our one -quarter will be paid by United. Dillerud will find out cost when he attends the meeting with MnDOT. Cul-de-sac: George Burkards, United Properties, stated that they would put a cul-de-sac on the preliminary plat with the understanding that if they have a user for the entire site, there is no need for a cul-de-sac. Planner Dillerud indicated it is the City's clear intent limit access points to Hudson Blvd. Parks Commission Recommendation: Planner Dillerud reported the Commission recommended no dedication for Stonegate Park to come out of this project. The trail system shows the community trail going through this park and back east. The Commission recommends the development plan show public trails to extend in some fashion over to the East. The corridor of easements will be considered park dedication and constructions of trail will come off park dedication fees -in -lieu. M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to approve the recommendation of the Parks Commission for an 8' paved City trail to come off park dedication fees -in -lieu. (Motion passed 5-0). Street Design: Tom Prow pointed out that resolution of street designs needs to be addressed between now and final plat. This loop street is included on the State Aid System. M/S/P DeLapp/Armstrong — to modify Condition No. 3 The public street extending southerly from Hudson Road shall be added to the Preliminary Plat in Resolution No. 99-46. (Motion passed 5-0). M/S/P DeLapp/Siedow — to adopt Resolution No. 99-46, A Resolution approving a Planned Unit Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat for Eagle Point Business Park, as amended, incorporating development standards of July 15, 1999 as modified and amended definitions by City Planner. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 1999