Laserfiche WebLink
objected because they did not want a front and a back road. No assessments for road. <br />Trees hide roads. Estimated 3,900 sq.ft. of fill in Lake Elmo. Total project is approx. <br />6000 sq.ft. The wetlands are being totally obliterated. Stream will have to be gone. <br />Council member Armstrong stated the east side would be the first ones to get out and use <br />the road. She liked how the City honors wetlands. <br />Mr. Waldron asked for endorsement of concept thru resolution cognizant of preserving <br />open space. Second, want agreement from Oakdale not pay for any construction. <br />DeLapp asked how much do we want to sell the easement for? Can we do it ? <br />Armstrong it's a mute point. Not the citys desire to collect money for the city. <br />The Council appreciated the City of Oakdale working with the Lake Elmo Council in an <br />effort to address our concerns. The road is going thru with or without our cooperation. <br />The Council suggested the Oakdale staff if they would put the parkland into some kind of <br />a land trust. <br />M/S/P Armstrong/Dunn — to direct the staff to prepare a resolution endorsing the concept <br />plan as stated and draw up an agreement between Oakdale and Lake Elmo as required, 4 <br />way stop sign on Ideal, adequate level of protection on park space legally, water runoff <br />concern, no money exchange for easement. (Motion passed 4-1Delapp don't give it <br />away, doesn't benefit the city, new houses coming don't meet 1 % rule by volume, always <br />be higher than what it was, residents don't want it) <br />Water on I-94: <br />Mr. Waldron stated the City of Oakdale is more than willing to accommodate Lake Elmo. <br />LE would like to see a longer term. Oakdale would not pull the plug in. Dunn concern <br />gap on water rates. <br />Adjourn workshop at 6:20 p.m. <br />LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES DECEMBER 7, 1999 2 <br />