HomeMy WebLinkAbout08-17-04 LE CCMPMayor:
Lee Hunt
Councilmembers:
Steve DeLapp
Susan Dunn
Dean Johnston
Wyn John
Please read:
Lake Elmo City Council
Tuesday,
August 17, 2004
3800 Laverne Avenue No.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
777-5510 777-9615 (fax)
Since the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that
decisions'are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City
Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and
experience. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings.
If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to
Appear Before the City Council form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized.
Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if
additional time is needed before a decision can be made.
Agenda
City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM
Pledge of Allegiance
1. Agenda
2. Minutes
3. PUBLIC INOUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL:
4. CONSENT AGENDA
A. Resolution No. 2004-068:Approve Claims
B. Reschedule November 2 Council Meeting
C. Resolution No. 2004-072 Approve
Additional Claim
5. FINANCE
A INFORMATIONAL: Date Change for
Public Hearing on Bond Resolution August 31,
2004
B. INFORMATIONAL: Monthly Operating
Report
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING:
A Update on Building Dept. Activities:Jim
McNamara
B. Fire Sprinklers — Prairie Ridge Office Park
August 4, 2004
Public Inquiries/Informational is an opportunity for citizens to
bring the Council's attention any items not currently on the
agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and
address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item
being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each
person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals
limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents
may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting or as bench
copies, to allow a more timely presentation.
Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to
be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion
under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in
which event, the item will be removed from the general order of
business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the
agenda.
Tom Bouthilet
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. PUBLIC HEARING:Assessment for Hill Trail
N./50th Street; Resolution No. 2004-069
B. PUBLIC HEARING:Assessment for 2004
Overlay Project; Resolution No. 2004-070
C. Proposed 4-way Stop Highlands Trail/59th
Street
D. VFW Ball Field Lights
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Open Space Concept Plan:Tapestry at
Charlotte's Grove:Resolution No. 2004-071
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. Highway 5
B. Fire Service Agreement with City of
Hudson, WI
C. Disposal of Fire Equipment
D. Animal Ordinance Amendment
E. Purchase offer for 3585 Laverne Avenue
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Hunt:Board of Directors
Vacancies; LMC 2004 Annual Conference
B. Council Member DeLapp
C. Council Member Dunn
D. Council Member Johnston
E. Council Member John:Discussion of
Smoking Ban
PRIMARY ELECTION: September
14, 2004
Lake Elmo City Council Agenda
August 17, 2004
Page 2
Tom Prew
C. Dillerud
J. Filla
M.Rafferty
Environmental Commission
Meeting:RESCHEDULE Wednesday,
August 18, 7 p.m. to September 15, 2004
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES
WEDNESDAY, AUGUST 4, 2004
(The Council meeting has been rescheduled from August 3, 2004
because of National Night Out)
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES: July 20, 2004
3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL:
4. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Resolution No. 2004-062 Approving Claims
B. Request for Meehan Family for an Extension of time to Record Final Plat
C. Ordinance Amending Definition for Building Height (POSTPONED)
D. Resolution No. 2004-062: Appointing Election Judges for Primary and
General Election
E. Resolution No. 2004-063: Designating Polling Places for the Primary and
General Election
5. FINANCE:
A. Schedule Meeting Date for Bond Resolution and Amend CIP
6. NEW BUSINESS
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIREBUILDING:..
A. Update on Fire Depaitinent Activities:Fire Chief Malmquist
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: -
A. Landscape Security Release -Eagle Point Business Park
9. PLANNING, LAND US&& ZONING:
A. Resolution No. 2004-064:Request to MnDOT for Iris Avenue Street Sign
B. Fence Ordinance:OrdinanceNo: 97 137
C. Fence Moratorium Request at 55`h Street N. (Postponed)
D. Limited Business Zoning District — Add Family Entertainment Center
(Tabled at the request ofthe applicant)
E. Resolution No. 2004-065:Final Plat, OP Plat & Development Agreement;
Whistling Valley Second Addition
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. New Public'Facilities:City Hall, Public Work Facilities and Possible Fire
Station
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS
A. Mayor Hunt:Smoking Ban
Acting Mayor Dunn called the meeting to order at 7 p.m. in the Council chambers.
PRESENT: John, Dunn, Johnston, DeLapp, City Engineer Prew, City Attorney Filla,
City Planner Dillerud, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet and Administrator Rafferty.
ABSENT: Mayor Hunt
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 1
1. AGENDA
DELETE: 9C. Fence Moratorium Request, TABLE: 9D at the request of the applicants;
ADD: 8B. Resolutions Calling for Assessment Hearings, 11D. Supreme Court Position,
Update on 37t Street Property
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp - to approve the August 4, 2004 City Council agenda, as
amended. (Motion passed 4-0).
2. MINUTES: August 4, 2004
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp - to approve the August 4, 2004 City Council minutes, as
amended. (Motion passed 4-0).
3. PUBLIC INOUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL:
Paul Ryberg, Friends of Lake Elmo Library, thanked the Council for paying for the booth
at the Washington County Fair and they still were looking for volunteers to man the
booth.
Liz Johnson, Planning Commission member, stated she thought white is a rural color for
a fence and asked the Council to reconsider discouraging particular colors which she felt
only sets up residents that could afford a fence of particular colors because they are more
expensive.
4. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Resolution No. 2004-061 Annroviria Claims
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp - to adopt Resolution No. 2004-061 approving Claim Numbers
DD203 through DD210 25931 through 25947, which were used for staff payroll dated
July 22, 2004, Claim Numbers 2594E through 25988 dated August 3, 2004 in the total
amount of $245,233.95. (Motion passed 4-0).
Council member. Johnston asked.what the accumulative expenses were for fighting the
Met Council. Finance Director responded $343,102 and anticipated expenses throughout
December.
B. Reauest for Meehan Family for an Extension of Time to Record Final Plat
Torre Pines was given preliminary plat approval July 1998 and final approval for all but
three lots in September 1998. The City was informed at that time that Mr. Meehan would
continue to live in the existing home on the 10 acres and that the final plat for these four
lots would not be done at this time. The Meehans are requesting another one-year
extension. Our code allows for this extension, but requires Council approval on a yearly
basis.
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp — to grant the Meehan's a one-year extension of the Final Plat of
Torre Pines, specifically the parcel snow shown as Lot 15. (Motion passed 4-0).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 2
C. Ordinance No. 97- AmendinO Definition for Building Height (Postponed
to 8/17)
D. Resolution No. 2004-062:Ann ointina Election Judges for Primary and,
General Election
M/S/P Jolmston/DeLapp — to adopt Resolution No. 2004-062, Appointing Elections
Judges for the September 14, 2004 Primary Election and the November 2, 2004 General
Election. (Motion passed 4-0).
E. Resolution No. 2004-063:Desienatina Polling Places for the Primary and
General Election
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp — to adopt Resolution No. 2004-063, Designating Polling Places
for the September 14, 2004 Primary Election and the November 2, 2004 General
Election. (Motion passed 4-0).
5. FINANCE
A. Schedule Meetine Date for Bond Resolution and Amend CIP
The Council selected Tuesday, August 24, 2004, 7 p.m. to bold the Public Hearing for the
Bond Resolution and Amend the CIP.
6. NEW BUSINESS:
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING:,
A. Update on Fire Department Activities:Fire Chief Malmquist
Fire Chief Malmquist reported the Department was invited to two neighborhoods for
National Night Out. The Department calls are down 40 to 50 calls from 2003. All of the
Firefighters on staff are First Responders. The Department will be attending Fire Fighter
Day at the Washington County Fair on Saturday.
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Landscape Security Release -Eagle Point Business Park
Planner Dillerud reported two growing seasons have been completed for the landscape
improvements at the Eagle Point Business Park (office condos on Eagle Point Blvd.).
Mike Bouthilet has inspected the landscaping and reported the landscaping complies with
the approved landscape plan for the site. He noted a handful of trees that had not
survived have been replaced by the project developer. Staff recommended release of the
$89,900 Letter of Credit securing the landscape plan for this site.
MIS/P Johnston/DeLapp - to approve release of M&I Bank Letter of Credit #SB6244
securing the landscape improvements of the Eagle Point Business Park based on the
Fining that the landscape improvements are complete per approved plans and the
landscape materials have survived two growing seasons. (Motion passed 4-0).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 3
B. Resolution No. 2004-066: A Resolution Calling a Public Hearing on
Proposed Assessment for the 2004 Overlay Proiect
M/S/P DeLapp/John — to adopt Resolution No. 2004-066, A Resolution for Hearing on
August 17, 2004, 7 p.m., for the Proposed Assessment for the 2004 Overlay Project: 49`h
Street, Jane Circle North, Jasper Avenue North, Jerome Avenue North. (Motion passed
4-0).
C. Resolution No. 2004-067: A Resolution Calling a Public Hearing on
Proposed Assessments for the Improvement of Hill Trail N.
M/S/P DeLapp/John — to adopt Resolution No. 2004-067:A Resolution for Hearing on
August 17, 2004, 7 p.m., for the Proposed Assessment for the Improvement of Hill Trail
North and 506i Street North. (Motion passed 4-0).
9. PLANNING. LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Resolution No. 2004-064:Reauest to MnDOT for Iris Avenue Street Sign
Planner Dillerud reported the Wildflower Shores HOA has requested installation of the
large MnDOT street signs on State Highway 5 identifyingthe Iris Avenue intersection.
These would be the same signs that now identify several. other streets that intersect State
Highway 5.
MnDot has requested a resolution of the Council. A proposed resolution was provided
for Council approval.
M/S/P DeLapp/John - to adopt Resolution No. 2004-064, Requesting MnDOT to install
street signs for Iris Avenue serving the Wildflower Shores neighborhood. (Motion
passed 4-0). Council member Dunn asked staff to look into the possibility of a smaller
scale size than the Klondike Avenue street sign.
B. Fence Ordinance
Planner Dillerud reported that at the July 20th meeting, the Council tabled the proposed
new fence ordinance to enable staff to consider incorporating additional items that
Council Members would communicate to staff in writing. Staff received comments from
Council members DeLapp and Johnston and Administrator Rafferty.
M/S/P Dunn/Johnston — to amend the text in Section 302.02 Fence Materials, Subd. 1—
Permitted Fence materials by deleting "other than those white in color". (Motion passed
3-1:DeLapp).
M/S/F Dunn/John — to amend the text in Section 302.02 Fence Materials, Subd. 3 —
Chain Link or Cyclone Fences by deleting "and shall be black or green in color".
(Motion Failed 2-2:Johnston said he didn't like the galvanized fences, DeLapp).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 4
M/S/P Johnston/Dunn — to amend the text in Section 302.02 Fence Materials, Subd. 3 —
Chain Link or Cyclone Fences by striking "and shall be black or green in color".
(Motion passed 3-1:DeLapp)
M/S/P Johnston/Dumi — to amend the text in Section 302.04 Temporary Fences, Subd. 1
— Defined to read "Temporary Fences shall be open to light and air over not less than
"40%" of the fence surface area." (Motion passed 4-0).
M/S/P Jolmston/DeLapp — to amend the text in Section 302.06 Fences as Screening and
Security as Required by This Code by adding "Item 4. No such screening shall be roofed
or covered in any manner. (Motion passed 4-0).
The Council suggested that in Section 302.02 add Temporary Fences as exclusion to
requiring a building permit. Council member Johnston asked if temporary fences are
adequately defined. Attorney Filla responded that temporary fence definitions could have
other fences; such as, garden, snow fences and swimming pool fences which are installed
and removed on a seasonal basis.
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp — to not require a building permit for temporary fences. (Motion
passed 4-0).
Attorney Filla suggested adding the words "6 months administratively."
M/S/P Johnston/John — to amend the text to read in Sectidn.302.07, Item 1. Fence Permits
Required; All such fences shall be removed by the property owner within 6 months of
the termination of the keeping of Domestic Farm animals; unless an extension is
specifically authorized by City Council action..: (Motion passed 4-0).
M/S/P Johnston/John — to adopt Ordinance No. 97-137, Fence Ordinance, as amended.
(Motion passed 4-0).
M/S/P Johnston/John to amend the agenda add 9B New Fence Ordinance and Repeal of
Fence Moratorium. (Motion passed 4=0).
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp — to repeal the Fence Moratorium. (Motion passed 4-0).
Planner Dillerud will address Council member Johnston's concern on clarification of
fences in the OHW setback in the shoreland ordinance,
C. Fence Moratorium Request at 55th Street North:
This agenda item was postponed to August 17th Council meeting per the request of,
resident, Tom McCormick.
D. Limited Business Zoning District — Add Family Entertainment Center:
This agenda item was tabled at the request of the applicant.
E. Resolution No, 2004-065:Final Plat, OP Plan & Develonment Agreement -
Whistling Valley Second Addition
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 5
Planner Dillerud reported Bald Eagle Development has applied for Final Plat approval of
the 18 lot Second Addition for Whistling Valley in the Northwest Quadrant of Keats
Avenue and 10th Street North. The Final Plat proposed is response to the approve
Preliminary Plat and the conditions to that approval (no direct trail access is proposed to
the Regional park). The City Attorney prepared a Development Agreement covering the
responsibilities and financial requirements of the developer. The final landscape plan
includes forestation exceeding the requirements of both the OP Ordinance and he
Subdivision Code. Staff recommended adopt of the Resolution approving the Final Plat
OP Plan and Development Agreement.
M/S/P Johnston/John - to adopt Resolution No. 2004-065, (change to concrete curb) A
Resolution approving the Final Plat, Final Plan, and Development Agreement of
Whistling Valley Second Addition per plans staff -dated July 29, 2004. (Motion passed 4-
0).
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
Attorney Filla reported the property on 37`h street has gone tax forfeit and he will come
back with an estimate of costs for proceeding.
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. New Public Facilities:City Hall_ Public Work Facilities and Possible Fire
Station
A presentation was made by staff and Tom Prew"and Terri Olsen, TKDA, for a new City
Hall, Public Works and potential Fire Facility. Two different options for a new city hall
complex were discussed, one site is the Brookfield 1I site, 3880 Laverne Avenue N., and
the second site is where Lion's Park .is located,,3525 Laverne Avenue, across from the
Lake Elmo Fire Hall. The Council did not make a decision between the two sites, but
wanted to proceed with moving the project forward in order to capitalize on the low
interest rates currently being offered. Council member Dunn voiced her concerns on the
drainage problem that has existed for years and where Lions Park, one of the city's first,
would be relocated. She said the:concern on high density housing in the Old Village area
was brought out at the public' meetings. Council member DeLapp pointed out the plans
didn't show senior housing and didn't deal with the space around city hall. Administrator
Rafferty reported staff has met with two master developers and they had positive things
to say on this proposal.
M/S/P Johnston/John — to set the public hearing date for August 24, 2004, 7 p.m., to
approve bond financing in the amount of 4,900,000 for a new city hall complex. (Motion
passed 4-0).
B. Confirmation of Captain Anointment
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 6
M/S/P Johnston/John — to confirm the appointment of Bruce Cohen to Captain of the
Lake Elmo Fire Department. (Motion passed 4-0).
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
Council member DeLapp announced the Sierra Club will hold a Tour de Sprawl bicycle
tour through the City on September 18th and are looking for the city to offer a squad
escort along 10'h Street.
M/S/P Johnston/DeLapp — to request the Washington County Sheriff's Department to
work with the Sierra Club to provide a squad escort on 10th Street N. for the bicycle tour,
Tour de Sprawl, on September 18, 2004. (Motion passed 4-0).
Administrator Rafferty reported there will be a workshop on the County -wide assessment
proposal, Tuesday, August 10, 10:15 a.m., in the Washington County Board Room.
The Supreme Court decision will come out on Thursday, 1 p.m,. He spoke to the Mayor
of Minnetrista, which is experiencing similar problems with the Met Council.
Discussion on the smoking ban will be referred to the Public Health and Safety Council
Committee. Discussion on purchase of a speed trailer in regard to issues on Highlands
Trail will be added to the Public Works Council Committee agenda.
Council adjourn the meeting at 9:30 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Resolution No.
Trail
2004-061 Approve Clatrtts
2004-062 Appoint Election Judges
2004-063 Designate Polling 'Races
2004-064 Request to MnDOT for Iris Avenue Street Sign
2004-065 Final Plat Of Whistling Valley Second Addition
2004-066 Ca11 a Public Hearing on Assessments for 2004 Overlay
2004-067 Call a Public Hearing on Assessments for Improvement of Hill
Ordinance No. 9-137 Fence Ordinance
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 4, 2004 7
MINUTES APPROVED: August 4, 2004
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MNUTES
JULY 20, 2004
1. AGENDA
2. MINUTES: JULY 6, 2004
3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL:
A. Public Informational
4. CONSENT AGENDA:
A. Resolution No. 2004-058:Approve Claims
B. Finance Specialist
C. Oakdale Water:Resolution No. 2004-060
5. FINANCE:
A. Monthly Operations Report: Informational
6. NEW BUSINESS:
7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING:
A. Update on Building Dept. Activities:Building Official
8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT:
A. Carriage Station Grading: (Verbal)
9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING:
A. Resolution No. 2004-059:Shoreland Zoning Variance, 2225 Legion Lane,
Olsen
B. Appeal of Administrative Determination: Anderson -Sorenson
C. Amended Fence Ordinance
D. Fence Moratorium Exemption Request at 55th Street North:
Ordinance No. 97-137
E. Limited Business Zoning District — Add Family Entertainment
Center:Ordinance 97-138 and 97-139
10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT:
11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT:
A. Meeting Time of Council Committees
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Hunt
(1) Update on Met Council Meeting
(2) National Night Out
(3) Smoking Ban
Mayor Hunt called the Council meeting to order at 7 p.m. in the Council chambers.
PRESENT: John, Hunt, Johnston, DeLapp, City Engineer Prew, Attorney John Miller,
City Planner Dillerud, Building Official McNamara, and Administrator Rafferty.
ABSENT: Council Member Dunn
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 2004 1
M/S/P DeLapp/Johnston - to adopt Resolution No. 2004-059, A Resolution approving a
variance to permit reconstruction of a pre-existing deck within the Shore land OHW of
Downs Lake at 2225 Legion Lane per plans staff dated July 8, 2004, and based on the
recommendation of the Planning Commission. (Motion passed 4-0).
B. Anneal of Administrative Determination: Anderson -Sorenson
The City Planner reported that the home builders in the Whistling Valley OP have
appealed determination by the Building Official regarding the application of the
definition of Building Height in Section 150 of the City Code. With an architectural
feature such as proposed for the roof of this home, the issue is whether the mean height of
the gable roof is to be measured from the firs roof level or the second upper roof level.
He reported that the appellant contends that the measurement of gable roof mid point
should be taken from the eaves and the top most ridge (the top of the second roof in this
case). With that interpretation this home would meet the 35 foot max height. With the
Building Official's more conservative interpretation, the calculated building height of this
home would be 38 feet.
Phil Anderson, Anderson -Sorenson stated that the first home built in Whistling Valley is
the same height as the one in question. Anderson said he felt the interpretation the
builder proposes meets the intent of the Code. He said he was looking for a solid
definition to guide their house design process.
Council member Johnston asked if this will start a precedent and come back to haunt the
City. Attorney Miller responded the section of the code should be amended for better
clarity.
Mayor Hunt suggested the Council approach the issue as we work on the performance
zoning.
Administrator Rafferty noted it is important in the short term to adjust the code to reflect
any City Council interpretations made as the result of an appeal.
M/S/P Johnston/John - to adopt a Board of Adjustment and Appeals Order directing the
Building Official to interpret the definition of Building Height for a hip or gable roof to
use the upper most ridge line of any structure as the upper point from which to measure
the average height of a structure with a hip or gable roof and multiple ridge lines.
(Motion passed 4-0).
M/S/P DeLapp/John - to direct the staff to adjust the code to preclude the first definition
of Building Height and include this interpretation in the new (second) definition.
(Motion passed 4-0).
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 2004 4
Entertainment Centers as a Conditional Use in the Limited Business zone. He reported
that the Commission also considered a new definition for the use to be added to Section
150 of the City Code. Finally, he reported that the Commission recommends the City
Council adopt no amendment to the Zoning Ordinance or Section 150 of the City Code
regarding the Family Entertainment Center use. He explained that the Commission did
not necessarily believe that the Family Entertainment use was inappropriate in the
Limited Business zone, but that the proposal to allow a maximum of 50,000 square feet
of floor area for that use when all other Limited Business Conditional Uses were now
limited to 20,000 square feet suggested an inappropriate scale of use.
Dave Larson, prospective purchaser of the Dolan Marine site explained the Dolan Marine
site, 9200 Hudson Blvd., currently includes two buildings, one that is just less than
33,000 square feet and one that is 14,000 square feet. He said that the larger building
would be remodeled to include indoor miniature golf, a small child play area, a small
retail area, snack bar/kitchen, arcade games, birthday party rooms and indoor soccer/field
hockey arena and indoor batting cages; and, that the smaller building could be used for
indoor paintball. He suggested that the back six acres would be left as open space with a
small fenced -in area to be used for outdoor boat storage.
Sabrina Dolan stated they have been looking to sell the business for some time and when
they were approached by Doug Larson about the possibility of turning the location into a
family entertainment center, they felt the idea would be a good fit for the City. She said
she didn't know why there is an issue with the size, since the project would be using the
existing buildings which are grandfathered in. Dolan added that, if the Council is thinking
of turning them down, it will have a large impact on their fancily.
John Bellows, Attorney for Dolan Marine. stated the property could be divided into three
separate uses, and pointed out the buildings was grandfathered in, and leaves options.
Council member DeLapp asked what about issues of advertising, lights, noise, traffic,
landscaping, parking, and sprinklers. What is the traffic count being proposed? Do we
intend to entertain Oakdale and Woodbury customers?
Tom Kendall, Broker for Dolan Marine, asked the City Council to look at what the
buyers are trying to do: non alcoholic, no smoking, purely family entertainment,
something for the family to do in a safe environment in the winter. He said that the
prospective buyers have a vision, and are not asking to raze the bldgs, but to remodel
existing facilities and improve the value of property which creates higher tax revenue for
the City. He noted that only the approval of the use is what is on the Council's agenda
now; and that conditions would be added to the resulting Conditional Use Permit that
address Council member DeLapp's concerns.
Jeff Lyman, prospective purchaser of the Dolan site, explained that he uses they would
propose are low intensity and not like a big box grocery store. He said they are planning
on sprinkling the property.
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 2004 6
12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS:
A. Mayor Hunt
(1) Update on Met Council Meeting
Mayor Hunt reported State Senator Brian LeClair, and mayors/council members from the
Grant, Afton, St. Croix Beach, Dayton, Baytown Township, and West Lakeland
Township joined Council Member Dunn, Mayor Hunt, Administrator Rafferty and
Planner Dillerud at a meeting with the Governor's Chief of Staff Dan McElroy, METC
Chair Bell and METC Regional Administrator Weaver early in July top discuss local
concerns regarding METC planning mandates to local governments.
Hunt reported that Chair Bell said he heard a collective voice of the support from the
communities to have the local planning authority they always had, but that Bell also
stated that no government has the absolute right of land use control.
Mayor Hunt would like to sign up more cities in support of' local control and ask the
support of the League of Minnesota Cities and the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities. Mayor Hunt will meet with the City Administrator as to the strategy in
that regard, and report to the Council the last meeting in August.
Council Member DeLapp noted that Council member Dunn deserves a strong
commendation from the City Council for arranging the meeting in the Governor's Office.
DeLapp also suggested the minutes of the meeting with the Met Council should be sent
out to City Council members in other cities and townships.
(2) National Night Out
National Night Out occurs on August 3`d, the same night of the City Council meeting.
M/S/P John/Johnston — to move the August 3`d Council meeting to Monday, August 2,
2004. (Motion passed 4-0).
(3) Smoking Ban
Mayor Hunt received a letter from the City of Saint Paul and Minneapolis outlining
various approaches taken by other communities in Minnesota and throughout the county
on implementing smoking ordinances. This subject will be discussed at the next Council
meeting.
Council member Johnston alerted the City of a potential Dutch Elm disease problem
which needs to be addressed with the Council support. He noted the City of Oakdale just
hired a tree inspector to address this problem. Staff will proceed with a plan of action.
The Council adjourn the meeting at 9:45 p.m.
Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk
LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES JULY 20, 2004 8
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-068
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Numbers 211, 212, DD211 through DD229
25898 through 26021, were used for Staff payroll dated August 05, 2004,
Claim Numbers 26022 through 26059 dated August 17, 2004 in the total amount
of $77,595.27 are hereby approved.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 17th day of August, 2004.
Lee Hunt
Mayor
ATTEST:
Martin J. Rafferty
City Administrator
Accounts Payable
Computer Check Proof List
User: Administrator
Printed: 08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM
Invoice No Description
Vendor:ACEHARD Ace Hardware
02074566
02074567
02078947 Light bulbs for City Hall
Check Total:
SPRINGB
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Check Sequence: I
14.91 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-42230
9.04 08/17/2004 601-494-9400-42270
49.13 08/17/2004 101-410-1940-42230
73.08
j �j a ui nmu of uoi „„ ou u
Reference
ACH Enabled: No
Vendor.ACTION Action Rental Check Sequence: 2 ACH Enabled: No
141262 Asphalt Fiber 27.69 08/17/2004 I01-430-3100-42240
Check Total: 27.69
Vendor:AmeriMar AtneriMark Direct Check Sequence: 3 ACH Enabled: No
10590 Recycling Materials 182.00 08/17/2004 101-430-3200-44300
Check Total: 182.00
Vendor.ARAM Aramark Check Sequence: 4 ACH Enabled: No
629-5519490 Linen -City Hall 46.68 08/17/2004 101-410-1940-44010
Check Total: 46.68
Vendor:ARCADELE Arcade Electric Check Sequence: 5 ACH Enabled: No
1644 Board at Lionn's Field 1,570.78 08/17/2004 404-480-8000-45300
1645 Board at VFW Field 1,092.04 08/17/2004 404-480-8000-45300
Check Total: 2,662.82
Vendor:BIFFS Bias Inc.
W22948I Restrooms
W229482 Restrooms
W229483 Restrooms
W229484 Restrooms
W229485 Restrooms
W229486 Restrooms
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM)
Check Sequence: 6
70.26 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
140.52 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
70.26 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
70.26 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
70.26 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
70.26 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44120
ACH Enabled: No
Page 1
Invoice No
W229487
Description
Restrooms
Check Total:
Vendor.CARQUEST Car Quest
D349818 Parts Supplies -Public Works
Check Total:
Vendor:COPYIMAG Copy Images, Inc.
50556 Copier Maintenance Agreement
Check Total:
Vendor.EMERGAPP Emergency Apparatus Maint.
18937 Installed new shut off valve Eng.3173
Check Total:
Vendor:EXCELLCO EXCELLCOM
11014000117 Cell Phone Accessories -Public Works
Check Total:
VendocFARMERS
2007
2056
914
918
VendorGENESIS
IVC00052
IVC00066
WC00066
IVC00066
IVC00066
Farmers Union Co -Op Oil
Fire Dept.
Fire Dept.
Fire Dept.
Car Wash
Check Total:
Next Genesis Productions
Fireball PC, Pgng sys, Phone setup
Capital Equipment
Reset printer - Mike
Install Pagemaker
Check Total:
Vendor.GLENWOOD Glenwood Inglewood
3988100 Public Works
Check Total:
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM)
Amount Payment Date
70.26 08/17/2004
562.08
10.32 08/17/2004
10.32
255.60 08/17/2004
255.60
637.85 08/17/2004
637.85
21.25 08/17/2004
21.25
26.50 08/17/2004
18.50 08/17/2004
25.50 08/17/2004
21.26 08/17/2004
91.76
254.88 08/17/2004
7,142.06 08/17/2004
50.00 08/17/2004
200.00 08/17/2004
50.00 08/17/2004
7,696.94
74.40 08/17/2004
74.40
Acet Number Reference
101-450-5200-44120
Check Sequence: 7
101-430-3100-42210
Check Sequence: 8
101-410-1940-44040
Check Sequence: 9
I01-420-2400-44040
Check Sequence: 10
101-430-3100-45800
Check Sequence: 11
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-44040
Check Sequence: 12
101-410-1320-44300
410-480-8000-45700
101-430-3100-44300
101-410-1520-43180
101-410-1910-44300
Check Sequence: 13
101-430-3100-44300
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
Page 2
Invoice No
Vendor:HAGBERGS
00010717
Vendor:HERITAGE
13251
Vendor:LEOIL
16629
16630
16632
252382
252601
2526I0
252630
253353
253644
253649
553716
553743
553773
852794
853501
Vendar:MALMQ
08042004 BURN
Vendor:MCFOA
2004-2005
Vendor:MCLEOD
6001010
6001010
6001010
6001010
6001010
6001010
Description
Hagbergs Country Market
Check Total:
Heritage Printing
Medical Run Forms - FD
Check Total:
Lake Elmo Oil, Inc.
Fuel public Works
Fuel public Works
Fuel public Works
Fuel Parks
Fuel Fire Dept
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Parks
Fuel Fire Dept
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Fire Dept
Fuel Fire Dept.
Fuel Parks
Check Total:
GregMalmquist
9 Burn permits
Check Total:
MCFOA
MCFOA Annual Memebership - Sh. Lumby
Check Total:
McLeod USA
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM)
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Check Sequence: 14
8.49 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-44300
8.49
Check Sequence: 15
35.36 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-42030
35.36
544.25
656.17
764.30
18.00
29.50
24.00
26.61
8.82
39.72
22.63
20.50
20.75
26.95
23.00
30.00
2,255.20
08/17/2004
08/I7/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
Check Sequence: 16
101430-3100-42120
101-430-3100-42120
101.430-3100-42120
101-450-5200-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-450-5200-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
101-420-2220-42120
10I-450-5200-42120
Check Sequence: 17
90.00 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-44300
90.00
Check Sequence: 18
35.00 08/17/2004 101-410-1320-44330
35.00
280.47
65.90
113.26
132.19
60.45
60.45
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
Check Sequence: 19
101-410-1940-43210
10I-420-2220-43210
101-420-2220-43210
101-430-3100-43210
602-495-9450-43210
601-494-9400-43210
Reference
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
Page 3
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
6001010 47.42 08/17/2004 601-494-9400-43210
6001010 58.83 08/17/2004 602-495-9450-43210
6001010 67.36 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43210
Check Total: 886.33
VendorMNFIREAS MN State Fire Dept Assn Check Sequence: 20
06/2004-06/2005 Annual Membership Fire Dept 180.00 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-44330
Check Total: 180.00
Vendor:OAKDRC Oakdale Rental Center Check Sequence: 21
32377 Swing Set 137.39 08/17/2004 101-450-520042250
Check Total: 137.39
Vendor:ONECALL Gopher State One-CallOne Call Concepts, Inc Check Sequence: 22
4070500 Line Locates 141.45 08/17/2004 101-430-3100-44300
Check Total: 141.45
Vendor:PELNAR KathiPelnar
JULY Animal Control Services- July 2004
Check Total:
Vendor:PETERSO Peterson Fram & Bergman
11135M
11140M
11150M
11161M
Check Total:
556.10 08/17/2004
556.10
Check Sequence: 23
101-420-2700-43160
Check Sequence: 24
1,600.00 08/17/2004 101-410-1610-43040
3,447.04 08/17/2004 101-410-1610-43045
720.00 08/17/2004 803-490-9070-43030
59.00 08/17/2004 101-410-1610-43040
5,826.04
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
Vendor:POLFUS Polfus Implement, Inc Check Sequence: 25 ACH Enabled: No
1019093 Set side mower from reverse to std rotat 58.00 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-44040
Check Total: 58.00
Vendor:Reserve Pitney BowesReserve Account Check Sequence: 26 ACH Enabled: No
20313037 July Statement 500.00 08/17/2004 101-410-1320-43220
Check Total: 500.00
Vendor:RUD DianePrince-Rud Check Sequence: 27 ACH Enabled: No
08/02-08/12 Cleaning City Hall 240.00 08/17/2004 101-410-1940-44010
08/02-08/12 Cleaning Fire Hall 240.00 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-44010
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM) Page 4
Invoice No
Vendor:S&T
01JF2490
01.1E5040
01E5218
Vendor: STATETRE
Seminar 09/22
Vendor:STILLGAZ
00003684
00003686
Vendor: TASCH
33607
Vendor.TKDA
200400000298
200400000299
200400000300
200400000301
200400000301
200400000301
200400000301
200400000301
200400000301
200400000302
200400000303
200400000304
200400000305
200400000306
200400000307
200400000308
Description
Check Total:
S&T Office Products, Inc.
Check Total:
State Treasurer
Registration Fee for Karl Horning
Check Total:
Stillwater Gazette
Check Total:
T.A. Schifsky & Sons
Sand Mix
Check Total:
TKDA, Inc.
VFW Ballfield Lights
Whisphering Valley Inspection
Grading Inspections
Meetings
Hill Traill Overlay
Background advice
NPDES Phase 11 Permit
34th Ave Lift Station
2004 Overlays Final Plans
50th Street Pond Study
Check Total:
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - I0:42 AM)
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
480.00
77.51 08/17/2004
517.58 08/17/2004
143.09 08/17/2004
738.18
Check Sequence: 28
101-410-1320-42000
101-410-1320-42000
101-410-1320-42000
Check Sequence: 29
35.00 08/17/2004 10I-420-2400-44370
35.00
27.30 08/17/2004
25.20 08/17/2004
52.50
39.53 08/17/2004
39.53
854.12
253.70
304.44
858.69
817.42
176.22
372.05
828.69
101.48
200.00
1,821.83
571.55
1,481.38
1,283.42
949.79
234.52
11,109.30
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/I7/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
08/17/2004
Check Sequence: 30
101-410-1320-43510
101-410-1320-43510
Check Sequence: 31
101-430-3100-42240
Check Sequence: 32
404-480-8000-43030
803-490-9070-43030
101-410-1930-43030
101-410-1910-43030
101-410-1930-43030
601-494-9400-43030
603-496-9500-43030
803-490-9070-43030
602-495-9450-43030
101-410-1930-43030
409-480-8000-43030
101-410-1910-43030
603-496-9500-43030
602-495-9450-43030
409-480-8000-43030
409-480-8000-43030
Reference
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
Page 5
Invoice No Description
Vendor:TRISTATE Tri State Bobcat, Inc.
507753 Bobcat Sweeper
V47192 Repairs to Bobcat
Check Total:
Vendor:TWINCII Twin City Water Clinic, Inc.
507 July Bacteria Analysis
Check Total:
Vendor. VIK1NG Vildng Office Products
827253880 Name signs
Check Total:
VendorWAS-LAND Washington County Surveyor
1004460 AutoCAD files covering City of Lake Elmo
Check Total:
Vendor. WASH-REC Washington County
1155 Cert. 35472 & 46572 - Walgren, Feldham
Check Total:
Amount Payment Date Acct Number
Check Sequence: 33
1,765.77 08/17/2004 410-480-8000-45400
288.69 08/17/2004 101-430-3100-44040
2,054.46
Check Sequence: 34
20.00 08/17/2004 601-494-9400-43030
20.00
100.09 08/17/2004
100.09
Check Sequence: 35
101-410-1910-42000
Check Sequence: 36
106.50 08/17/2004 101-410-1910-42000
106.50
39.00 08/17/2004
39.00
Check Sequence: 37
101-10-1910-44300
Vendor:XCEL Xcel Energy Check Sequence: 38
0044-445-749210 SOFTBALL FIELD 71.01 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43810
0084 all 646209 4259James Ave N 135.10 08/17/2004 101-430-3100-43810
0176-825-022209 Traffic at I94 & Inwood 21.14 08/17/2004 101-430-3160-43810
0417-949-252210 3800 LAVERNE 387.15 08/17/2004 101-410-1940-43810
0446-544-592209 Traffic at Stillwater Blvd & Manning 24.20 08/17/2004 101-430-3160-43810
0573-240-678209 11194 Upper 33rd StreetN 32.21 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43810
0592-147-254210 PEBBLE PARK 21.32 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43810
0614-943-270209 Traffic lights 998 Inwood 30.83 08/17/2004 101-430-3160-43810
0777-146-175209 3510 Laverne Ave N Tennis Courts 7.41 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43810
1278-842-757210 3303 LANGLY CT 731.97 08/17/2004 601-494-9400-43810
1427-822-590210 8860 HUDSON BLVD 45.89 08/17/2004 602-495-9450-43810
1577-643-354209 3510 Laverne Ave N FIRE DEPT 140.99 08/17/2004 101-420-2220-43810
1684-846-045208 2795 Legion Ave N 11.95 08/17/2004 602-495-9450-43810
1957-348-187209 11062 34th Street 12.32 08/17/2004 602-495-9450-43810
2045-967-139211 11975 55th Street N 697.22 08/17/2004 601-494-9400-43810
2175-049-940209 3511 Laverne Ave N 28.65 08/17/2004 101-450-5200-43810
2332-806-007214 STREET LIGHTS 1,566.65 08/17/2004 101-430-3160-43810
Reference
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
ACH Enabled: No
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM) Page 6
Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference
Check Total: 3,966.01
Total for Check Run: 4I,792.40
Total Number of Checks: 38
AP - Computer Check Proof List (08/13/2004 - 10:42 AM) Page 7
ONTH
Jan
Feb
March
April
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Totals
11135
Administration
$1,320.75
$1,353.00
$2,721.92
$2,346.98
$2,029.36
$2,388.61
$1,600.00
11140
Criminal Pros
$2,548.83
$2,845.88
$4,762.74
$3,964.04
$3,528.77
$5,051,95
$3,447.04
$13,760.62 $26,149.25
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
2002LBILLING SUMMARY
11145
Public Imp. Proj
$66.00
$88.00
$33.66
$66.00
11150
Community Dew
$330.21
$187,00
$286.00
$111.61
$341.00
$720.00
11155
Civil Litigation
$2,196.75
$125.28
$692.76
$654.43
11161
Auto Forfeiture
$109.00
$99.00
$92.50
$59.00
$253.66 $1,975,82 I $3,669.22 $359.50
TOTAL
$6,462.54
,$4,511.16
$8,463.42
$7,162.45
$5,802.40
$7,940.06
$5,826.04
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 -1
_$0.00
I $0.00
$46,168.07
1 8/10/2004
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo MN 55042
PFTERSON.
FRAMC'BERGMAN
RefisiennEtztesifOrrynaryttneffiestintliMick
ACCOUNT NO:
(651) 291-8955
16511 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
07/31/2004
11135M
FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE
11135-030008 SIMICH FENCE
93.00 0.00 0.00 $93.00
11135-040005 CARRIAGE STATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT
66.00 0.00 0.00 $66.00
11135-920001 Administration
1,441.00 0.00 0.00 $1,441.00
1,600.00 0.00
/0(_gfo-9l..10-`13040
0.00 $1,600.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St, Paul, MN 55101.1197
PETERSONt
FRAMa"BERGMAN
tRt���a�"a.^ki5itffis�N:� ffititll lV:'Y431LtYl��
(651) 291-8955
(6511 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11135-030008M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 7
SIMICH FENCE
07/22/04 JPF Telephone conference with adm and Simich; rev
settlement agreement re: extension of fence to N.W.
corner.
07/26/04 JPF Telephone conference with adm re: Simich agreement.
07/30/04 JPF Revise Family Entertainment corr.
Jerome P. Filla
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.40 38.00
0.30 33.00
0.20 22.00
0.90 93.00
0.90 93.00
93.00
$93.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST PAY OW THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PET'ERSON,
FRAMC''BERGMAN
`a4Ila.`Ott* hflefitel:w.' alitkift3lMk..W1
(651) 291-8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID M41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11135-040005M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 3
CARRIAGE STATION DRAINAGE EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT
07/02/D4 JPF Review right of entry agreements; tele Prew and
Rafferty.
Jerome P. Filla
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.60 66.00
0.60 66.00
0.60 66.00
66.00
$66.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECENED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
P TERSON
FRAM BERGMAN
YWt*UiII0,60-'DortiAi I.Y91M1m:WOl10041
1651) 291.8955
(65I) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT NO: 11135-920001M
Lake Elmo MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 151
Administration
07/01/04
07/02/04 JPF
07/06/04 JPF
JPF
JPF
07/12/04 JPF
JPF
JPF Review ordinance establishing Fire Dept and Dept
Bylaws for City Code - Bylaw revisions.
Telephone conference with Prew, Rafferty re:
Heritage Farms water.
Review council agenda; tele planner.
Review planner corr re: fencing/screening; rev code.
Prepare for and attend council meeting.
Review PC
Telephone
screening
agenda.
conference
regs.
with planner re: fence,
07/15/04 JPF Telephone conference with Adm re: Smith; planner re:
fence regs; clerk re: data practices; rev Sessing
memo.
07/16/04 JPF
JPF
07/26/04 JPF
07/30/04 JPF
07/16/04 JMM
07/20/04
Telephone conference with planner re: council agenda
items; review agenda.
Telephone conference with Dillerud, S. Dolan, R.E. -
Tom Kendal re: GB -LB & proposed regs; rev code
Telephone conference with planner re: proposed
family entertainment regs.
Review Walter variance application.
Jerome P. Filla
Review agenda and prepare for meeting
JMM Telephone call to staff & prepare for meeting;
review agenda.
JMM Attend city council meeting & related matters.
HOURS
0.60 66.00
0.30 33.00
0.50 55.00
0.40 44.00
3.40 374.00
0.40 44.00
0.30 33.00
0.60 66.00
0.90 99.00
1.10 121.00
0.20 22.00
0.30 33.00
9.00 990.00
0.60 66.00
0.50 55.00
3.00 330.00
THIS STATEMENT 1S DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
Administration
PWFERSON,
FRAMC'BERGMAN
John Michael Miller
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
(651) 291-8955
(651) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991 098
Page: 2
07/31/2004
ACCOUNT NO: 11135-920001M
STATEMENT NO: 151
4.10 451.00
13.10 1,441.00
1,441.00
$1,441.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEMED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo MN 55042
PWEERSON.
FRAMBERGMAN
EbtA®US,'f Mc&.`�f(aBs+W:U:iL`�.`�tYiSb'aN.HSgBt`1
11140-030001 Misc Prosecutions
11140-030170 Kuehn, James
11140-030225
FEES
2,329.00
420.00
Wetterstrom, William
serious/fatal crash report
35.00
11140-040008 Tamasese, Joseph
violate OFP
5.00
11140-040016 Petersen, Kerry Alan
DAC-IPS
30.00
11140-040046 Hahne, Jamew Newton
GM -false info to police
5.00
11140-040105 Rychlik, Waclaw Andrew
2nd degree DUI
66.50
11140-040113 Jarosch, Katherine Lillian
OFP Violation
30.00
11140-040118 Weinand, Mark Allen
school bus arm violation
30.00
EXPENSES
27.82
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ACCOUNT WO:
ADVANCES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0D
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
(6511 291-8955
(6511 228-1753 Facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991098
Page: 1
07/31/2004
11140M
BALANCE
$2,356.82
$420.00
$35.00
$5.00
$30.00
$5.00
$66.50
$30.00
$30.00
THIS STATEMENT 15 DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
PE:VERSON,
FRAMC'BERGMAN
panitaluthaivitazatawaridawasitaorkairsui
11140-040129 Romero, Roman Joseph
DAR, speed
11140-040136 Ramirez, Alicia Dawn
assault
ACCOUNT NO:
(6511291.8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 2
07/31/2004
11140M
FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE
55.00 0.00 0.00 $55.00
57.50 1.61
11140-040157 Wright, Donald W.
DUI, crim. damage to property
30.00
11140-040166 Malmgren, Nathan A.
GM no insurance, DAR, mj in mv,
possess drug pare
0.00
10.00 0.00
11140-040167 Langevin, Joseph Louis
reckless discharge of weapon
80.00
11140-040168 Speckerman, Gregory Fred
GM-DAC-IPS
0.00
10.00 0.00
11140-040171 Newman, Matthew Nestle
speed 67/55, marijuana in mv,
possess drug paraphenilia
15.00
11140-040172 Liebgott, Jasen Michael
GM-911 violation, domestic assault
assault, doc
0.00
77.50 0.00
11140-040173 Neadeau, Tara Lynn
2nd degree DUI, open bottle
120.50
1.61
0.00 $59.11
0.00 $30.00
0.00 $10.00
0.00 $80.00
0.00 $10.00
0.00 $15.00
0.00 $77.50
0.00 $122.11
THIS STATEMENT 15 DUE AND PAVADLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL SE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Pau), MN 55101.1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
PETERSON.
FRAMC''BERGMAN
p-E OF; :'SSW fA; ir-A a :®:,ar
ACCOUNT NO:
(6511291.8955
(651) 228.1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID 441-0991098
Page: 3
07/31/2004
11140M
FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE
11140-040176 Benoy, Monty
fail to display current registratio
5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00
11140-040183 Oman, Joseph Ray
no insurance, fail to register MV
5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00
3,416.00 31.04
lai-yro- )4,ra- 1/30H..5
0.00 $3,447.04
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OE STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3600 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH
LAKE ELMO MN 55042
PE -'PERSON
FRANCBERGMAN
IitgatiS*-`64NOWfatiiNK:K s_
11150-000003 RECO Property Permits
11150-030002
11150-030010
11150-040004
242.00
SORENSON/BALD EAGLE O.P. DEVELOPMENT
93.00
SOVEREIGN ESTATE MINOR SUBDIVISION
33.00
WHISTLING VALLEY SECOND ADDITION
165.00
FEES EXPENSES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
ACCOUNT NO:
ADVANCES
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11150-040005 LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH - REZONING - SUP
44.00 0.00 0.00
11150-040007 TAPESTRY 0.P. DEVELOPMENT
143.00
720.00
0.00
0.00
go3^'{<o-`7b7n-L oaO
0.00
0.00
(651) 291-8955
1651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
07/31/2004
11150M
BALANCE
$242.00
$93.00
$33.00
$165.00
$44.00
$143.00
$720.00
THIS STATEMENT 1S DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PF 'TERSON,
FRAMCIBERGMAN
UDtbaMagri littaw# ISr9lIMMMMLIMd:WW01110
1651) 291-8955
(6511 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT NO: 11150-000003M
Lake Elmo MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 22
RECO Property Permits
HOURS
07/06/04 JPF Letter to planner re: RECO plat; city regs; time
lines; impact of MS15.99; rev regs and 15.99; draft
corr. 1.10 121.00
07/07/04 JPF Telephone conference with planner re: RECO; final
plat status; revise corr. 0.50 55.00
07/13/04 JPF Letter to Atty Dietzen re: status. 0.30 33.00
07/30/04 JPF Telephone conference with Atty Dietzen re: legal
status. 0.30 33.00
Jerome P. Filla 2.20 242.00
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 2.20 242.00
TOTAL CURRENT WORK 242.00
BALANCE DUE $242.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL DE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PF FERSON,
FRAM'BERGMAN
IwNtams41.WVanwil t°lihN71.11eAM9'umiloae'1
(6511 291-8955
(65 f ) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11150-030002M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 7
SORENSON/BALD EAGLE O.P. DEVELOPMENT
07/30/04 JPF Telephone conference with Ann Theis, planner re:
consv esmt, Dev K.
JPF Revise dev agreement; tele planner.
Jerome P. Filla
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.50 55.00
0.40 38.00
0.90 93.00
0.90 93.00
93.00
$93.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFPER THE LAST DAY OP THE MONTH WALL RE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-I 197
P_ ERSON__
FRAM BERGNIAN
(651 ) 291-8955
(6511 228-1753 Facsimile
Federal Tax ID#41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11150-030010M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 5
SOVEREIGN ESTATE MINOR SUBDIVISION
07/26/04 JPF Telephone conference with clerk re; revisions to
esmt, minor subd revisions.
Jerome P. Fills
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.30 33.00
0.30 33.00
0.30 33.00
33.0D
$33.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAV OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PF'ERSON.
FRAMCIBERGMAN
I t� IxBB.ffi Bl.�'R Blae Hai :91.'e:'Lk®k� f659r � (C ®YQrn fl
(651) 291.8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11150-040004M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 6
WHISTLING VALLEY SECOND ADDITION
07/08/04 JPF Review Dev K; consery esmt re: inclusion of Phase 1
& 2; tele planner.
07/23/04 JPF Revise Dev K; rev cons. esmt.
07/28/04 JPF Revise Dev K, 2d add; tele Atty Thies re: conserv,
esmts 1st & 2d addition.
HOURS
0.40
0.50
44.00
55.00
0.60 66.00
Jerome P. Fills 1.50 165.00
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 1.50 165.00
TOTAL CURRENT WORK 165.00
BALANCE DUE $165.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OI% THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PETERSON.
FRAM&BERGMAN
11wdiog00:4840-'&1 of II t141 1.79410Y.Mt#w011s4elt
(6511 291-8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41.0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 Laverne Avenue North ACCOUNT NO: 11150-040005M
Lake Elmo MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 2
LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH - REZONING - SUP
07/06/04 JPF Telephone conference with Atty Beck; staff repts;
applicable law.
Jerome P. Filla
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.40 44.00
0.40 44.00
0.40 44.00
44.00
$44.00
THIS STATEMENT I5 DUF AND PAYABLE TO THE END OE THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED APTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTIVS STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St Paul, MN 55101.1 197
PF 'ERSON.
FRAMC'BERGMAN
(6511291.8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID #41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11150-040007M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 1
TAPESTRY O.P. DEVELOPMENT
07/02/04 JPF Review development application, OP regs; title
commitment and supp does; tele - corr to planner.
Jerome P. Fills
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
1.30 143.00
1.30 143.00
1.30 143.00
143.00
$143.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAVARLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL RE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55106.1197
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH
LAKE ELMO MN 55042
PETERSON.
FRAMC'BERGMAN
11161-040002 Rychlik, Waclaw Andrew
vehicle forfeiture
ACCOUNT NO:
1651) 291-8955
(691) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID 114I-0991098
Page: 1
07/31/2004
11161M
FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE
54.00 0.00
11161-040003 Nadeau, Tara Lynn
vehicle forfeiture- 1990 Chev.
Corsica
5.00 0.00
59.00 0.00
0.00 $54.00
0.00 $5.00
0.00 $59.00
(o(- Kla- icotr7 -430gQ
THIS STATEMENT IS DDE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECENED APTER THE. LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL DE COEDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
P TERSON.
FRAM 'YBERGMAN
Iuitasn pnaiBsBa W :emwtrottntrseaa
(651 )291-8955
(691) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID 841-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11161-040002M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 4
Rychlik, Waclaw Andrew
vehicle forfeiture
07/13/04 JPF Letter to HP re: case law and release of car.
Jerome P. Fills
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
BALANCE DUE
HOURS
0.40 54.00
0.40 54.00
0.40 54.00
54.00
$54.00
THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Suite 300
50 East Fifth Street
St. Paul, MN 55101-1197
PETERSON.
FRAM-BERGMAN
(6511 291.8955
(651) 228-1753 facsimile
Federal Tax ID X41-0991098
Page: 1
CITY OF LAKE ELMO 07/31/2004
3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH ACCOUNT NO: 11161-040003M
LAKE ELMO MN 55042 STATEMENT NO: 1
Nadeau, Tara Lynn
vehicle forfeiture- 1990 Chev.
Corsica
07/28/04 CLE Request motor vehicle registration and insurance.
HOURS
0.10
Connie L. Egge 0.10
FOR CURRENT SERVICES RENDERED 0.10
TOTAL CURRENT WORK
5.00
5.00
5.00
5.00
BALANCE DUE $5.00
THIS STATEMENT 1S DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH.
PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT.
PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT.
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CONSENT AGENDA No 4B.
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: November 2nd City Council Meeting
Background Information for August 17.2004:
The regularly scheduled November 2, 2004 City Council meeting will be rescheduled to November 3, 2004
at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. The Council will be canvassing the results of the General Election.
Action Items:
Motion to reschedule the November 2, 2004 City Council
meeting to Wednesday, November 3, 2004 because of the
General Election held on that date.
Person responsible:
S. Lumby
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-072
RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS
BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Number 26060 payable to the City of Oakdale
dated August 17, 2004 in the total amount of $12,871.48 are hereby approved.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 17th day of August, 2004.
Lee Hunt
Mayor
ATTEST:
Martin J. Rafferty
City Administrator
As of 8/17/2004 (Periods 1-8)
IYIVI RI tly tWNv.•
Description
Mayor & Council
Part-time Salaries $12,100.00
FICA Contributions $750.00
Medicare Contributions $176.00
Travel Expense $450.00
Miscellaneous $4,000.00
Dues & Subscriptions $5,500.00
Conferences & Training $5,000.00
Sub -Total $27,976.00
Budget Per Range Amt Variance
$5,667.00
$583.85
$136.54
$3,750.00
$14,758.75
$2,477.00
$12.00
$27,385.14
$6,433.00
$166.15
$39.46
-$3,300.00
-$10,758.75
$3,023.00
$4,988.00
$590.86
Administration
Full-time Salaries $124,020.00, $63,952.94 $60,067.06
PERA Contributions $6,858.00 $2,676.91 $4,181.09
FICA Contributions $7,689.00 $3,985.92 $3,703.08
Medicare Contributions $1,798.00 $932.19 $865.81
Health/Dental Insurance $21,834.00 _ $8,770.45 $13,063.55 _
Workers Compensation $1,688.00 $0.00 $1,688.00
Office Supplies $7,000.00 $4,030.54 $2,969.46
Printed Forms $800.00 $188.29 $611.71
Newsletter/Website $14,000.00 $3,412.56 $10,587.44
Postage $9,500.00 $5,399.54 $4,100.46
Travel Expense $1,500.00 $336.00 $1,164.00
Legal Publishing $6,000.00 $2,036.18 $3,963.82
Insurance $27,360.00 $29,581.00 -$2,221.00 Annual Premiums Paid
Miscellaneous $6,000.00 $3,343.47 $2,656.53
Dues & Subscriptions $1,500.00 $1,834.66 -$334.66
Books $500.00 $0.00 $500.00
Conferences & Training $2,500.00 $20.00 $2,480.00
Transfer Out $70,500.00 $0.00 $70,500.00
Sub -Total $311,047.00 $130,500.65 $180,546.35
Elections
Part-time Salaries $7,000.00 $191.67 $6,808.33
Office Supplies $100.00 $0.00 $100.00
Printed Forms $300.00 $0.00 $300.00
Travel Expense $50.00 $0.00 $50.00
Miscellaneous $800.00 $340.00 $460.00
Sub -Total $8,250.00 $531.67 $7,718.33
Comments
-1-
s Uescnption ouaget ref Range HMG vanance
Finance
Full-time Salaries $41,432.00 $14,503.06 $26,928.94
PERA Contributions $2,569.00 $730.76 $1,838.24
FICA Contributions $2,291.00 $900.56 $1,390.44
Medicare Contributions $601.00 $210.67 $390.33
Health/Dental Insurance $7,318.00 $1,557.22 $5,760.78
Office Supplies $800.00 $0.00 $800.00
Printed Forms $1,000.00 $28.12 $971.88
Software Support $4,000.00 $2,194.36 $1,805.64
Hardware Support $2,000.00 $1,557.50 $442.50
Software Programs $3,000.00 $950.00 $2,050.00
Travel Expense $1,000.00 $22.00 $978.00
Miscellaneous $200.00 $240.70 -$40.70
Books $200.00 $0.00 $200.00
Conferences & Training $1,000.00 $20.00 $980.00
Sub -Total $67,411.00 $22,914.95 $44,496.05
Accounting Services
Assessing Services
$24,000.00 $18,856.29
$35,000.00 $11,900.00
ILegal Services $15,000.00 $17,680.84
Civil Attomey Criminal $45,000.00 $26,449.75
Sub -Total $60,000.00 $44,130.59
$5,143.71
$23,100.00
-$2,680.84
$18,550.25
$15,869.41
v ,uuuc uw
I Planning & Zoning
IFull-time Salaries $75,586.00 $42,758.75 $32,827.25
PERA Contributions $4,180.00 $3,466.47 $713.53
I FICA Contributions $4,686.00 $2,668.13 $2,017.87
!Medicare Contributions $1,096.00 $623.93 $472.07
Health/Dental lnsurance $11,686.00 $5,865.42 $5,820.58
Workers Compensation $847.00 $0.00 $847.00
Office Supplies $500.00 $243.34 $256.66
Printed Forms $500.00 $0.00 $500.00
Zoning Ordinance Dev - CDBG $0.00 $8,776.97 -$8,776.97 Expense offset by Grant received from Washington County $ 49,666 I
Cimarron Study - CDBG $10,000.00 $10,035.00 -$35.00
Comprehensive Planning $10,000.00 $0.00 $10,000.00
Engineering Services $2,500.00 $9,299.23 -$6,799.23
Legal Services $1,000.00 $341.00 $659.00
Infiltration Project $0.00 $21,505.16 -$21,505.16 Expense offset by Grant received from METC $29,501.00
Old Village Tax Abatement $73,148.00 $15,308.88 $57,839.12
Travel Expense $2,000.00 $673.75 $1,326.25
Miscellaneous $200.00 $89.00 $111.00
Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $710.00 -$210.00
Books $200.00 $0.00 $200.00
Conferences & Training $2,500.00 $635.36 $1,864.64
Sub -Total $201,129.00 $123,000.39 $78,128.61
-2-
uescnption
Engineering Services
ouuget rer rtange Cann vanaucn
$26,000.00 $11,598.49 $14,401.51
Gov't Buildings
Cleaning Supplies
'Building Repair Supplies
'Attorney Fees
'Telephone
Electric Utility
'Refuse
I Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg
Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt
Miscellaneous
Law Enforcement Contract
Transfer Out
Sub -Total
Sub -Total
Fire
Full-time Salaries
Part-time Salaries
PERA Contributions
FICA Contributions
Medicare Contributions
Health/Dental Insurance
Workers Compensation
Office Supplies
Printed Forms
EMS Supplies
Fire Prevention
Fuel
Equipment Parts
Building Repair Supplies
'Small Tools & Equipment
'Physicals
Telephone
Radio
Travel Expense
Vehicle Insurance
Electric Utility
Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg
Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt
Rentals - Building
$500.00
$500.00
$100,000.00
$6,500.00
$5,000.00
$2,040.00
$8,000.00
$6,000.00
$400.00
$128,940.00
$322,000.00
$15,000.00
$337,000.00
$17,434.00
$93,850.00
$964.00
$5,583.00
$1,306.00
$3,127.00
$2,469.00
$1,500.00
$750.00
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$4,500.00
$0.00
$1,000.00
$1,200.00
$2,000.00
$4,600.00
$7,500.00
$2,000.00
$11,792.00
$4,400.00
$7,000.00
$23,000.00
$1,080.00
$63.21
$134.75
$87,222 56
$2,394.13
$3,085.40
$705.13
$6,554.78
$3,648.12
$366.73
$104,174.81
$318,717.56
$0.00
$318,717.56
$6,808.23
$70,153.52
$367.30
$4,772.40
$1,116.18
$843.87
$0.00
$463.77
$35.36
$0.00
$0.00
$1,401.25
$348.00
$220.92
$1,010.13
$2,520.00
$1,994.43
$97.40
$1,161.85
$12,908.00
$2,881.81
$4,075.00
$6,490.67
$720.00
$436.79
$365.25
$12,777.44
$4,105.87
$1,914.60
$1,334.87
$1,445.22
$2,351.88
$33.27
$24,765.19
$3,282.44
$15,000.00
$18,282.44
$10,625.77
$23,696.48
$596.70
$810.60
$189.82
$2,283.13
$2,469.00
$1,036.23
$714.64
$2,000.00
$4,000.00
$3,098.75
-$348.00
$779.08
$189.87
-$520.00
$2,605.57
$7,402.60
$838.15
-$1,116.00 Annual Premiums Paid
$1,518.19
$2,925.00
$16,509.33
$360.00
-3-
uescnpuon
Uniforms
Miscellaneous
Dues & Subscriptions
Books
Conferences & Training
Pension Contribution
Fire State Aid
Equipment
Transfer Out
Sub -Total
Building Inspections
Full-time Salaries
PERA Contributions
FICA Contributions
Medicare Contributions
Health/Dental Insurance
Workers Compensation
Office Supplies
Printed Forms
Fuel
Engineer Sery Utility Permits
Plan Review Charges
Surcharge Payments
Telephone
Travel Expense
Insurance
Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt
Rentals - Building
Uniforms
Miscellaneous
Dues & Subscriptions
Books
Conferences & Training
Transfer Out
Civil Defense
9-
! Animal Control
IPrinted Forms
I Contract Services
(
Impounding
Miscellaneous
Sub -Total
Sub -Total
rsuaget rer Range NMI vallanWu wuuauwuw
$9,500.00 $2,158.19 $7,341.81
$1,300.00 $4,080.03 -$2,780.03 Laptop Software Implementation -To be reimbursed by County $2560.00
$2,300.00 $2,745.45 -$445.45
$200.00 $0.00 $200.00
$15,000.00 $5,485.00 $9,515.00
$41,000.00 $0.00 $41,000.00
$25,000.00 $0.00 $25,000.00
$10,000.00 $711.89 $9,288.11
$60,000.00I $0.00 $60,000.00
$367,355.00 $135,570.65 $231,784.35
$113,365.00
$6,292.00
$7,029.00
$1,644.00
$23,588.00
$616.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
$3,000.00
$5,000.00
$13,500.00
$0.00
$1,000.00
$877.00
$500.00
$4,000.00
$600.00
$200.00
$300.00
$300.00
$2,500.00
$5,000.00 j
$194,811.00
$9,000.00
$500.00
$5,600.00
$6,000.00
$400.00
$12,500.00
$67,993.75 $45,371.25
$3,276.81 $3,015.19
$4,226.26 $2,802.74
$988.39 $655.61
$9,756.30 $13,831.70
$0.00 $616.00
$370.62 $629.38
$354.59 $1,145.41
$151.13 $2,848.87
$0.00 $3,000.00
$0.00 $5,000.00
$663.10 $12,836.90
$773.12 -$773.12 Cell Phone Expense
$155.00 $845.00
$872.00 $5.00
$1,601.77-$1,101.77 Repairs to Bldg Vehicles - 637.00 Miscode belongs in Fire
$2,556.00 $1,444.00
$156.93 $443.07
$208.41 -$8.41
$741.47 -$441.47
$0.00 $300.00
$310.00 $2,190.00
$0.00 $5,000.00
$95,155.65 $99,655.35
$0.00 $9,000.00
$0.00
$4,400.54
$4,180.30
$0.00
$8,580.84
$500.00
$1,199.46
$1,819.70
$400.00
$3,919.16
-4-
II uescnpuuu ouuyct rel RQII9 Allit' VQIIQ114C l'VIIIIIICIIIS
Public Works
IFull-time Salaries $106,087.00 $57,948.23 $48,138.77
VPart-time Salaries $0.00 $900.00 -$900.00 Salary Split between Part -Time Parks
I PERA Contributions $5,867.00 $2,855.59 $3,011.41
FICA Contributions $6,577.00 $3,649.51 $2,927.49
Medicare Contributions $1,538.00 $853.53 $684.47
Health/Dental Insurance $24,607.00 $8,343.99 $16,263.01
Workers Compensation $3,773.00 $0.00 $3,773.00
Office Supplies $300.00 $28.11 $271.89
Fuel $8,500.00 $8,392.79 $107.21
Shop Materials $2,500.00 $944.12 $1,555.88
Equipment Parts $10,000.00 $2,229.96 $7,770.04
Building Repair Supplies $1,000.00 $655.68 $344.32
Street Maintenance Materials $22,500.00 $690.07 $21,809.93
Landscaping Materials $2,500.00 $359.34 $2,140.66
Sign Repair Materials $4,000.00 $786.77 $3,213.23
Sand/Salt $20,000.00 $4,808.16 $15,191.84
Small Tools & Minor Equipment $1,500.00 $566.49 $933.51
Engineering Services $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00
Contract Services $22,500.00 $26,341.96 -$3,841.96 Street Sweeping $ 17086 Snow Plowing $9738.00 Roads Graded 2603.00
Telephone $3,750.00 $1,399.24 $2,350.76
Radio $200.00 $0.00 $200.00
Travel Expense $500.00 $15.00 $485.00
Insurance $11,265.00 $13,603.00 -$2,338.00 Annual Premiums Paid
Electric Utility $6,500.00 $4,058.39 $2,441.61
Refuse $250.00 $731.23 -$481.23 Budget Error Past Budget classified into Contract Services
Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg $2,000.00 $1,028.00 $972.00
Repairs/Maint Imp Not Bldgs $1,500.00 $2,460.17 -$960.17
Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt $4,500.00 $3,913.49 $586.51
Rentals -Buildings $1,500.00 $0.00 $1,500.00
Uniforms $900.00 $761.35 $138.65
Miscellaneous $2,000.00 $1,505.11 $494.89
Dues & Subscriptions $500.00 $150.00 $350.00
Conferences & Training $500.00 $100.00 $400.00
Clean-up Days $9,500.00 $11,282.74 -$1,782.74
Other Equipment $12,250.00 $21.25 $12,228.75
Transfer Out $78,693.00 $0.00 $78,693.00
Sub -Total $382,057.00 $161,383.27 $220,673.73
Street Lighting $16,800.00
Sanitation
Recycling Supplies $6,000.00
l Newsletter $5,000.00
I Miscellaneous $7,100.00
11 Sub -Total $18,100.00
$10,008.22
$6,791.78
$0.00 $6,000.00
$0.00 $5,000.00
$1,128.00 $5,972.00
$1,128.00I $16,972.00
-5-
.r......
a-uuuuCULs`
Parks
Full-time Salaries $58,215.00 $29,733.18 $28,481.82
Part-time Salaries $23,550.00 $14,360.94 $9,189.06
PERA Contributions $3,219.00 $1,739.94 $1,479.06
FICA Contributions $5,069.00 $2,737.04 $2,331.96
Medicare Contributions $1,186.00 $640.17 $545.83
Health/Dental Insurance $9,916.00 $3,051.51 $6,864.49
Workers Compensation $2,819.00 $0.00 $2,819.00
Office Supplies $250.00 $0.00 $250.00
Fuel $2,200.00 $305.31 $1,894.69
Shop Materials $1,000.00 $105.96 $894.04
Chemicals $500.00 $0.00 $500.00
oEquipmentParts $4,000.00 $607.40 $3,392.60
Building Repair Supplies $1,000.00 $168.48 $831.52
Landscaping Materials $10,000.00 $2,472.58 $7,527.42
Small Tools & Minor Equipment $1,000.00 $45.49 $954.51
Telephone $1,500.00 $754.06 $745.94
Travel Expense $0.00 $50.00 -$50.00
Insurance $2,900.00 $3,084.00 -$184.00 Annual Premiums Paid
Electric Utility $6,050.00 $3,306.48 $2,743.52
Refuse $2,400.00 $1,287.72 $1,112.28
Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg $2,000.00 $1,060.93 $939.07
Repairs/Maint Imp Not Bldgs $5,000.00 $348.79 $4,651.21
Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt $1,000.00 $64.38 $935.62
Rentals - Buildings $2,500.00 $2,810.41-$310.41
Uniforms $400.00 $52.37 $347.63
Miscellaneous $100.00 $128.00 -$28.00
Dues & Subscriptions $100.00 $50.00 $50.00
IConeerences & Training $400.00 $0.00 $400.00
Transfer Out $16,500.00 $0.00 $16,500.00
Sub -Total $164,774.00 $68,965.14 $95,808.86
General Fund Total 2,392,150
1,294,502 1,097,648
-6-
a, ,.anyonuu varlance
Comments
Water Enterprise Operating
Full-time Salaries
PERA Contributions
FICA Contributions
Medicare Contributions
Health\Dental Insurance
Workers Compensation
Office Supplies
Printed Forms
Chemicals
Utility System Maintenance
Water Meters & Supplies
Small Tools & Minor Equipment
Engineering Services
Software Support
Telephone
Postage
Travel Expense
Insurance
Electric Utility
Water Utility
RepairslMaint Imp Not Bldgs
Miscellaneous
Conferences & Training
Other Equipment
Subtotal
$61,939.001
$3,425.00
$3,840.00
$898.00
$9,171.00
$890.00
$100.00
$1,050.00
$2,000.00
$1,200.00
$16,000.00
$197.00
$2,500.00
$4,000.00
$2,000.00
$650.00
$600.00
$2,380.00
$12,000.00
$35,000.00
$1,000.00
$5,000.00
$500.00
$1,800.00
$168,140.00
Sewer Enterprise Operating
Full-time Salaries $17,594.00
PERA Contributions $973.00
FICA Contributions $1,091.00
Medicare Contributions $255.00
Health/Dental insurance $2,375.00
Workers Compensation $328.00
Utility System Maint Supplies $524.00
Small Tools & Minor Equipment $200.00
Engineering Services $1,500.00
Telephone $1,150.00
Travel Expense $0.00
Electric Utility $1,225.00
RepairslMaint Imp Not Bldgs $1,000.00
Miscellaneous Expenses $0.00
Conferences & Training _ $0.00_
Subtotal $28,215.00
$43,131.89 $18,807.11
$2,103.55 $1,321.45
$2,680.56 $1,159.44
$626.90 $271.10
$4,921.39 $4,249.61
$0.00 $890.00
$0.001 $100.00
$202.36 $847.64
$439.31 $1,560.69
$1,042.97 $157.03
$1,765.45 $14,234.55
$255.43 -$58.43
$2,449.77 $5023
$379.00 $3,621.00
$748.55 $1,251.45
$0.00 $650.00
$375.00 $225.00
$2,985.00 -$605.00
$8,298.90 $3,701.10
$35,969.52 -$969.52
$3,861.15-$2,861.15 Retapp Three Water Connections-3100; Repair of Water Main Break 1049
$1,359.00 $3,641.00
$110.00 $390.00
$0.00 $1,800.00
$113,705.70 $54,434.30
$10,342.79 $7,251.21
$494.02 $478.98
$643.06 $447.94
$150.41 $104.59
$1,077.57 $1,297.43
$0.00 $328.00
$58.56 $465.44
$0.00 $200.00
$5,619.95-$4,119.951Services for Lift Station Upgrades
$914.34 $235.68
$29.00-$29.00
$949.60 $275.40
$2,511.29 -$1,511.29 Lift Station Repairs
$300.00 -$300.00
$18920-$189.20i
$23,279.791 $4,935.211
1
-7-
.a..,,i,I variance ' Comments
Storm Water Enterprise Operating
Full-time Salaries $24,751.00 $0.00 $24,751.00
PERA Contributions $1,369.00 $0.00 $1,369.00
!FICA Contributions $1,535.00 $0.00 $1,535.00
!Medicare Contributions $359.00 $0.00 $359.00
! Health/Dental Insurance $4,771.00 $0.00 $4,771.00
!Workers' Compensation $340.00 $0.00 $340.00
!Office Supplies $500.00 $0.00 $500.00
Utility System Maint Supplies $2,162.00 $0.00 $2,162.00
Small Tools & Minor Equipment $1,000.00 $0.00 $1,000.00
Engineering Services $4,500.00 $11,019.43 -$6,519.43 Initial Set-up Expense
Erosion Control $2,100.00 $0.00 $2,100.00
Software Support $1,000.00 $4,050.00 -$3,050.00 Initial Set-up Expense
Postage $1,576.00 $515.00 $1,061.00
!Contract Services $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00
! Repairs/Maint Not Bldg $2,000.00 $0.00 $2,000.00
Miscellaneous Expenses $0.00 $348.26-$348.261
Transfer Out $30,315.00{ $0.00 $30,315.001
Subtotal $80,278.001 $15,932.69 $64,345.31
!Total Enterprise Fund
$276,633.00 $152,918.18 $123,714.82
Grand Total 2,668,783 1,447,420 1,221,363
J1
1
-8-
July-4UU4
Permits
Issued
:w Residential 3
,w Commercial 2
ther Residential 38
ther Commercial 2
Total 45
Summary Building Report
Valuation
$1,809,500.00
$400,000.00
$545,031.00
$120,000.00
$2,874,531.00
'otai Building Fees Collected ! $33,093.19
Plumbing
Summary Plumbing Report
11 $120,900.00
i'New Residential
New Commercial
i�Other Residential
Other Commercial
r ear to uate
Permits
Issued
Valuation
10 5,906,468.00
6 1,400,000.00
196 2,382,919.00
19 864,783.00
Total 231
$10,554,170.00
Total Building Fees Collected j $134,579.94
Summary Plumbing Report
Plumbing 66
$587,654.00
Total Plumbing Fees Collected ( $855.00 , Total Plumbing Fees Collected $4,933.75
Summary HVAC Report
HVAC 10
Total HVAC Fees Collected
Summary Grand Total Fees
Surcharge Fee Paid to State
SAC Fees Paid to Met Council
WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale
Misc. Expenses
Total Fees Retained
Credit Fees to Bldg
Credit Fees to Water
Credit Fees to Sewer
$60,600.00
$805.00
$34,753.19
$1,433.48
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$33,319.71
$33,169.21
$0.00
$150.50
Summary HVAC Report
HVAC 69
$335,758.00
Total HVAC Fees Collected P $4,887.75
Summary Grand Total Fees
ir.Surcharge Fee Paid to State
:SAC Fees Paid to Met Council
WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale
IMisc. Expenses
Total Fees Retained
Credit Fees to Bldg
' Credit Fees to Water
Credit Fees to Sewer
$144,401.44
$5,236.18
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$139,165.26
$138,389.76
$400.00
$375.50
1
4175 Commercial
4174 Commercial
Totals for Class Of Work: New Number of Perrmits = 2
Totals for Occupancy: B
Occupancy
U-1
Number of Permits = 4
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Building Permit Detail Summary
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
1 Occupancy B
Class Of Work: Remodel
Permit # Description of Work
4168 interior buildout
4167 interior buildout
Totals for Class Of Work: Remodel Number of Permits = 2
Class Of Work: New
Date Issued Use of Building
7/15/2004 Office Building
7/15/2004 Office Building
Sum of Valuation =
Permit# Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building
7/20/2004 Office Building
7/20/2004 Office Building
Valuation
60,000
60,000
120,000
Valuation
200,000
200,000
Sum of Valuation = 400,000
Sum of Valuation = 520,000
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 1 of 5
Class Of Work: Add
Valuation
Permit # Description of Work Date Issued Use of Bufldfng
4156 deck/ porch 7/9/2004 Single Family Dwelling 17,275
4186 addition & remodel 7/26/2004 Single Family Dwelling 15,000
4184 accessory structure 7/26/2004 Accessory Building 3,000
4183 Garage 7/22/2004 Accessory Building 13,830
Totals for Class Of Work: Add Number ofPemnits=4 Sum of Valuation 49,105
Totals for Occupancy: U-1 Number of Permits = 4 Sum of Valuation = 49,105
1 Occupancy R-3
Class Of Work:
Valuation
Permit # Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building
4188 demolition 7/27/2004 Mobile Home 1,000
Totals for Class Of Work: Number of Permits = 1 Sum of Valuation = 1,000
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 2 of 5
Class Of Work: Add
Permit # Description of Work Date issued Use of Building Valuators
4164 deck/ porch 7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling 9,000
4169 swimming pool 7/15/2004 Single Family Dwelling 20,000
4155 Deck 7/9/2004 Single Family Dwelling 3,000
4191 Siding & Window Replacement 7/28/2004 Single Family Dwelling 8,500
4154 swimming pool 7/8/2004 Single Family Dwelling 20,000
4153 Deck 7/8/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,500
4152 Deck 7/8/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,600
4150 driveway 7/7/2004 Single Family Dwelling 8,990
4163 addition & remodel 7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling 22,750
4176 Deck 7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling 6,600
4179 Porch and bathroom 7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling 28,800
4180 Fireplace 7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,300
4181 Deck 7/22/2004 Single Family Dwelling 1,500
4182 heating 7/22/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,700
4189 accessory structure 7/2712004 Accessory Building 10,000
4190 swimming pool 7/28/2004 swimming pool 3,900
Totals for Class Of Work: Add Number of Permits = 16 Sum of Valuation = 153,140
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 3 of 5
Class Of Work: Remodel
Permit # Description of Work
4192 Basement finish (includes plmg&htg)
4145 Excavation & Grading
4148 Deck
4143 Remodel (including pimg&Htg)
4178 Remodel
4173 window replacement
4166 window replacement
4193 Siding
4165 window replacement
4170 addition & remodel
Totals for Class Of Work; Remodel Number of Permits = 10
Class Of Work: New
Permit # Description of Work
4157 New House
4177 New House
4161 New House
Totals for Class Of Work: New Number of Perrmits = 3
Date Issued Use of Building
7/30/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/2/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/6/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/1/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/20/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/15/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/30/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/15/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/16/2004 Single Family Dwelling
Sum of Valuation =
Date Issued Use of Building
7/12/2604 Single Family Dwelling
7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling
7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling
Sum of Valuation =
Valuation
22,000
5,000
3,000
30,000
11,500
2,386
5,000
12,000
10,000
150,000
250,886
Valuation
1,300,000
278,000
231,500
1,809,500
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 4 of 5
Class Of Work: Repair
Valuation
Permit # Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building
4147 Roof Replacement (ice & water) 7/6/2004 Single Family Dwelling 1,000
4146 stucco 7/6/2004 Single Family Dwelling 80,000
Totals for Class Of Work: Repair Number of Permits = 2 Sum of Valuation = 81,000
Class Of Work: Demolition
Valuation
Permit # Description of Work Date Issued Use of Building
4162 demolition 7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,100
4158 demolition 7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling 2,100
4159 demolition 7/14/2004 Mobile Home 2,100
4172 demolition 7/16/2004 Mobile Home 1,500
4160 demolition 7/14/2004 Mobile Horne 2,100
Totals for Class Of Work: Demolition Number of Permmits = 5 Sum of Valuation = 9,900
Totals for Occupancy: R-3 Number of Permits = 37 Sum of Valuation = 2,305,426 1
Grand Total for All Permits Issued:
Number of Pertnits 45 Total Valuation = 2,874,531
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 5 of 5
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Building Permit Detail Summary
Occupancy R-3
Class Of Work: New
Valuation
Permit # Description of Work Date issued Use of Building
4177 New House 7/21/2004 Single Family Dwelling 278,000
4161 New House 7/14/2004 Single Family Dwelling 231,500
4157 New House 7/12/2004 Single Family Dwelling 1,300,000
Totals for Class Of Work: New Number of Pernnits = 3 Sum of Valuation = 1,809,500
Totals for Occupancy: R-3 Number of Permits = 3 Sum of Valuation = 1,809,500
Grand Total for All Permits Issued:
Number of Permits 3 Total Valuation = 1,809,500
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 1 of 1
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Plumbing Permit Detail Summary
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Permit # Description of Work
4144 alter septic
4149 water heater install
4157 new resd plmg & sewer/septic
4170 alter resd plmg
4174 New Commercial
4175 New Commercial
4177 new plumbing
4178 alter resd plmg
4179 alter resd plmg
4186 alter resd plmg
4187 lawn sprinkler
Date Issued
7/1/2004
7/6/2004
7/12/2004
7/16/2004
7/20/2004
7/20/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/21/2004
7/26/2004
7/26/2004
Valuation
7,500
400
35,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
25,000
5,000
6,000
10,000
2,000
Number of Permits 11 Total Valuation = 120,900
Tuesday, August 10, 2004 Page 1 of 1
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
HVAC Permit Detail Summary
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Permit # Description of Work Date Issued Valuation
4151 Gasline 7/7/2004 200
4157 HVAC-residential 7/12/2004 18,000
4170 alter resd hvac 7/16/2004 3,000
4171 air conditioning 7/16/2004 2,100
4174 New Commercial 7/20/2004 8,000
4175 New Commercial 7/20/2004 8,000
4177 HVAC-residential 7/21/2004 14,000
4179 alter resd hvac 7/21/2004 1,200
4185 air conditioning 7/26/2004 3,100
4186 7/26/2004 3,000
Number of Permits 10 Total Valuation = 60,600
Tuesday, August 10, 2004 Page 1 of 1
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Date Permit # Permit Fee Surcharge Plan RevieNOther InvestigatioiSAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/1/2004 4143 $442.25 $15.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00
772/2004 4145 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2004 4146 $853.75 $40.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2004 4147 $38.75 $0.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2004 4148 $83.25 $1.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/7/2004 4150 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/8/2004 4152 $83.25 $1.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/8/2004 4153 $83.25 5125 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/8/2004 4154 $321.25 $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/9/2004 4155 $83.25 $1.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/9/2004 4156 $293.25 $8.64 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/12/2004 4157 $6,703.75 $650.00 $4,357.44 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $75.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4158 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4159 $0.00 . $0.00 $0.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4160 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 550.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4161 $1,732.95 $115.75 $0.00 $126.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4162 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/14/2004 4163 $363.25 $11.38 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00
7/14/2004 4164 $167.25 $4.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/15/2004 4165 $181.25 $5.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/15/2004 4166 $111.25 $2.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/15/2004 4167 $713.75 $30.00 $463.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 1 of 3
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Date Permit # Permit Fee Surcharge Plan RevieiOther InvestigatioiSACFee Sewer Fee WACFee Meter Sales Tax
7/15/2004 4168 $713,75 $30.00 $463.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/15/2004 4169 $321.25 $10.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/16/2004 4170 $1,273.75 $75.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/16/2004 4172 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/20/2004 4173 $83.25 $1.19 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/20/2004 4174 $1,553.75 $100.00 $1,009.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/20/2004 4175 $1,553.75 $100.00 $1,009.94 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2004 4176 $139.25 $3.30 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2004 4177 $1,990.55 $139.00 $1,293.86 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $75.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2004 4178 $209.25 $5.75 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2004 4179 $432.15 $14.40 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/21/2004 4180 $83.25 $1.15 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/22/2004 4181 $54.00 $0.75 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/22/2004 4182 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/22/2004 4183 $237.25 $6.92 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/26/2004 4184 583.25 $1.50 50.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00
7/26/2004 4186 $251.25 $7.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2004 4188 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $50.50 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/27/2004 4189 $181.25 55.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/28/2004 4190 $97.25 $1.95 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/28/2004 4191 $167.25 $425 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
7/30/2004 4192 $349.25 $11.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
Page 2 of 3
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Building Permit Fees
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Date Permit # Permit Fee Surcharge Plan RevieriOther InvestigationSAC Fee Sewer Fee WAC Fee Meter Sales Tax
7/30/2004 4193 $209.25 $6.00 $0.00
Totals:
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
$22,239.65 $1,423.48 $6599.06 $680.50
$0.00 $0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $150.50
Grand Total of Building Related Fees Collected: $33,093,19
Tuesday, August 10, 2004
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Page 3 of 3
Totals:
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
Plumbing Permit Fees
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Date Permit # Permit Fee Surcharge
7/1/2004 4144 $0.00 $0.00
7/6/2004 4149 $50.00 $0.50
7/12/2004 4157 $100.00 $0.50
7/16/2004 4170 $50.00 $0.50
7/20/2004 4174 $150.00 $0.50
7/20/2004 4175 $150.09 $0.50
7/21/2004 4177 $100.00 $0.50
7/21/2004 4178 $50.00 $0.50
7/21/2004 4179 $50.00 $0.50
7/26/2004 4186 $50.00 $0.50
7/26/2004 4187 $100.00 $0.50
$850.00 $5.00
Grand Total of Plumbing Fees Collected: $855.00
Totals:
City of Lake Elmo
Building Department
HVAC Permit Fees
July 01, 2004 Through July 31, 2004
Date Permit # Permit Fee Surcharge
7/7/2004 4151 $50.00 $0.50
7/12/2004 4157 $100.00 $0.50
7/16/2004 4170 $50.00 $0.50
7/16/2004 4171 $50.00 $0.50
7/20/2004 4174 $150.00 $0.50
7/20/2004 4175 $150.00 $0.50
7/21/2004 4177 $100.00 $0.50
7/21/2004 4179 $50.00 $0.50
7/26/2004 4185 $50.00 $0.50
7/26/2004 4186 $50.00 $0.50
$800.00 $5.00
Grand Total of HVAC Fees Collected: $805.00
Lake Elmo
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Section: Maintenance/Park/Fire/Building No. 7B
Agenda Item: Fire Sprinklers — Prairie Ridge Office Park
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
As a part of the Council's approval action on the site plan for the Prairie Ridge office condos (Highway 5 at
Stillwater Blvd.) it was agreed that the developer would be required to only install "dry" fire sprinlder
systems. That concession by the City was based on the inability of the City to extend municipal water
service to the site in a financially feasible manner due to Oakdale water supply contract issues.
The City has been subsequently contacted by the developer advising that the State Fire Marshall will not
permit installation of "dry" sprinkler systems due to the false sense of, security such installations will
project. With that finding — which we have confirmed — it no longer appears possible to enforce the Site
Plan condition on the Prairie Ridge project that requires the "dry" systems be installed. A provision of the
State Building Code (also the City's building code, by reference) allows cities to waive the fire sprinkling
requirement where the Building Official and Fire Chief certify their concurrence with such a waiver because
no adequate water supply is available. By their August 11 letter Chief Malmquist and Build Official
McNamara have concurred in the waiver.
Based on the foregoing the City Council is respectfully requested to approve an amendment to the Site Plan
approval of Prairie Ridge Office Park deleting the condition requiring the installation of a "dry" fire
sprinkler system.
Action items:
Motion to approve an amendment to the Site Plan approval of
Prairie Ridge Office Park deleting the condition requiring the
installation of a "dry" fire sprinkler system.
Attachments:
1. Fire Chief/Building Official August 11 Waiver Letter
Pevsod r�snonsible:
er/Building Official
Time Allocated:
1
CITY OF
LAKE
ELMO
City of Lake Elmo 651/777-5510
> 3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, MN 55042
August 11, 2004
Chuck Dillerud
Re: Prairie Ridge fire sprinkler requirements
Chuck,
After conferring with the State of Minnesota Fire Marshal's Office (Dave Stegura) and
the State Building Codes and Standards Division (Fred Driver) I, along with our Fire
Chief, Greg Malmquist wave the requirement of the fire sprinlder systems for the Prairie
Ridge Development due to the fact that the city does not have the ability to furnish the
development with the necessary water supply for a fire sprinkler system. This option is
given under section 1306.0060 of the fire sprinkler code providing other requirements are
met.
Previously it was suggested, by myself, to have the developer install the necessary piping
in the buildings now but not require the buildings to be on line with their sprinkler
systems until such time that the city was able to furnish an adequate water supply. This,
however, was not and is not acceptable to the state fire marshal's office.
im McNamara
uilding 0
City of Lake Elmo
Greg Malmquist
Fire Chief
City of Lake Elmo
�4 pooled med on recycled paper
E. Optional occupancy group -municipality
may choose option I or option 2.
1. _ Group R-1 and R 2 occupancies with
8,500 or more gross square feet of floor area or
dwelling units or guestrooms on three or more
floors; and attached R-3 occupancies and
attached townhouses built to the International
Residential Code with 8,500 or more gross
square feet of floor area. All floors, basements,
and garages are included in this floor area
threshold.
2. Attached R-3 occupancies and attached
townhouses built to the International
Residential Code with more than 16 dwelling
units or more than three stories in height.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.59;1613.61;16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0040 STANDARD.
Automatic sprinkler systems must comply
with the applicable standard referenced in the
State Building Code. If a public water supply
is not available, the building official and fire
chief shall approve the use of an altemate
on -site source of water if the alternate source
provides protection that is comparable to that
provided by a public water supply. If an
adequate alternate water supply sufficient for
hose stream requirements is provided or
available, the building official and fire chief
may permit the water supply requirements for
the hose stream demands to be modified.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.59; 16B.61; 16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0050 SUBSTITUTE
CONSTRUCTION.
The installation of an automatic sprinkler
system, as required by this chapter, would still
allow the substitution of one -hour fire -resistive
construction as permitted by the International
Building Code, Table 601, footnote d.0
STAT AUTH: MS s I6B.59; 1613.61; 16B.64
242
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0060 EXEMPTION,
The building official, with the concurrence of
the fire official, may waive the requirements of
this chapter if the application of water has been
demonstrated to constitute a serious life, fire, or
environmental hazard, or if the building does
not have an adequate water supply and the
building is surrounded by public ways or yards
more than 60 feet wide on all sides.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.59; 16B.61; 16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306:0070 REPORTING.
A municipality must submit a copy of the
ordinance adopting this chapter to the
Department of Administration, Building Codes
and Standards Division, within 15 days of its
adoption.
REPEALER. • Minnesota Rules, part
1306.0100, is repealed.
STAT AUTH: MS s 16B.59; 16B.61; 16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0100 Repealed, 27 SR 1479
VIINNFSOT.A RI I SS, PTER 1306
SPFCIL\1. FIRE PRO'III( TI(>N tilS'NIS
1306.0010 GENERAL.
This chapter authorizes optional provisions
for the installation of on -premises fire
suppression systems that may be adopted by a
municipality in addition to the State Building
Code. if the municipality adopts them, the
sprinkler system requirements of this chapter
become part of the State Building Cade and are
applicable throughout the municipality. This
chapter, if adopted, must be adopted without
amendment.
STAT AUTH: MS s 1613.59; 16B.61; 16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0020 MUNICIPAL OPTION.
Subpart 1. Requirement. The sprinkler
system requirements of this chapter, if adopted,
must be adopted with the selection of either
subpart 2 or 3, without amendment.
Subp. 2. Existing and new buildings.
Automatic sprinkler systems for new buildings,
buildings increased in total floor area
(including the existing building), or buildings in
which the occupancy classification has
changed, must be installed and maintained in
operational condition within the structure. The
requirements of this subpart apply to structures
that fall within the occupancy classifications
established in part 1306.0030, items A to E.
Exceptions:
1. The floor area of minor additions that do
not increase the occupant load does not have to
be figured into the square footage for
occupancy classifications established in part
1306.0030, items A to E.
2. The existing portion of R-2 apartment
occupancies, attached R-3 occupancies, and
attached townhomes is not required to be
sprinldered under this chapter.
Subp. 3. New buildings. Automatic
sprinkler systems for new buildings, additions
to existing buildings, or buildings in which the
occupancy classification has changed must be
installed and maintained in operational
condition within the structure. The
requirements of this subpart apply to structures
that fall within the occupancy classifications
established in part 1306.0030, items A to E.
Exception: The floor area of minor
additions that do not increase the occupant load
does not have to be figured into the square
• footage for occupancy classifications
established in part 1306.0030, items A to E.
STAT AUTH: MS s 1613.59;168.61;16B.64
HIST: 27 SR 1479
1306.0030 REQUIREMENTS.
For purposes of this chapter, area separation,
fire barriers, or .fire walls do not establish
separate buildings. Gross square footage (gst)
means the floor area as defined in the
International Building Code. The floor area
requirements established in items A to E are
based on the gross square footage of the entire
building and establish thresholds for these
requirements. The following occupancy groups
must comply with sprinkler requirements of
this chapter, unless specified otherwise:
A. Group A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4
occupancies;
B. Group B, F, M, and 5 occupancies with
2,000 or more gross square feet of floor area or
with three or more stories in height;
C. Group E occupancies with 2,000 or more
gross square feet of floor area or with two or
more stories in height
D. Group E day care occupancies with an
occupant load of 30 or more;
241
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: No 8A.
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: PUBLIC HEARING: Assessment Hearing on Hill Trail/50th Street Reconstruction
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
In his letter dated August 12, 2004, the City Engineer reported the project is nearly complete and only turf
establishment work remains. He recommends adoption of the assessment rate of $2,500.00 per unit (67.5
assessable units) for this project.
Action Items:
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2004-069, A Resolution
Adopting Assessments for the Reconstruction of Hill Trail
North and 50th Street North as presented by the City
Engineer.
Attachments:
1. Tom Prew Letter, August 12, 2004
2. Resolution No. 2004-069
3. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment
4. Final Assessment Roll
Person responsible:
T.Prew
RUG-13-2004 08:57 TKDR
651 292 0083 P.02/02
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS . PLANNERS
August 12, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Re; Assessment Hearing
Hill Trail/ 50th Street Reconstruction
TKDA Commission No. 12170-03
1500 Piper Jalhay Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Pauli MN 55101.2140
(551) 292-4400
(651) 292-0093 Fax
www.tkda.cam
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This project is nearly complete, only some turf establishment work remains. The recommended
assessment rate is $2,500.00 per unit, which is the same as we discussed at the public hearing.
Because this is a reconstruction project, our assessment policy allows us to have appraisals done
before and after the project to determine the increased property value as a result of the
improvement. This was done in January 2003, before the project occurred. The appraiser
estimated the average benefit per building site at $2,500,00.
In the both Feasibility Report, and at the Public Hearing, the staff recommended that we assess
100% of this increase in property value. There are 67.5 assessable units on this project.
Project costs were as follows:
Final Project Cost $ 480,000.00
Recommended Assessment $ 168.750.00
City Cost $ 311,250.00
A list of property owners is attached.
City Council Action Requested
Adopt the recommended assessment rate of $2,500.00 per unit for this project.
Sincerely:
Thomas D, Prew, P. E.
City Engineer
TDP:tlb
Enclosure (By City)
An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity
TOTAL P.02
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-069
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE RECONSTRUCTION OF
HILL TRAIL NORTH AND 50n-I STREET NORTH
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the
improvement of Hill Trail North and 50th Street North in Lake Elmo, Minnesota.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE
ELMO, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is herby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the
first Monday in January, 2005, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.75 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first
installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this
resolution until December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due
shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of
the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of he assessment on such
property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Lake Elmo,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30
days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay
to the City of lake Elmo the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,
with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.
Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged
through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4. The Finance Director shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the
county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as
other municipal taxes.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 17th day of August, 2004.
Lee Hunt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sharon Lumby, City Clerk
CITY OF
LAKE 1
ELMO
1
City of Lake Elmo
651 /777-5510
3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, MN 55042
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Lake Elmo City Council will meet in the
council chambers of City Hall, 3800 Laverne Avenue North, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August
17, 2004, to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment against abutting property for
the street improvements on Hill Trail North and 50th Street North.
Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing.
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is
$2,500.00. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of ten (10) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first
Monday in January 2005, and will bear interest at the rate of 5.75 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2005. To
each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment roll to the Washington
County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City of Lake Elmo. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid
within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. You may at anytime thereafter, pay to the
Washington County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding
year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest
that will apply is 5.75 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment is not
available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the city administrator's
office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $168,750.00. Written or oral objections
will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment
unless a signed, written objection is filed with the city administrator prior to the assessment
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice
consider any objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned
meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
printed on recycled paper
Under Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, the council may, in its discretion, defer the
payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owner by a person 65 years of
age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, When deferment of the
special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated plus applicable interest become due. Any assessed property owner meeting
the requirements of this law and the policy adopted under it may, within 30 days of the
confirmation of the assessment, apply to the city administrator for the prescribed form for such
deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure
will be followed:
1. The city will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or
by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified,
the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated
with each witness until neither side has further questions.
2. After the city has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present
such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the
city's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be video-taped.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to
the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at
this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the mayor or city administrator within 30
days after the adoption of the assessment roll and filing such notice with the district court within
ten days after service upon the mayor or city administrator.
Dated at Lake Elmo, Minnesota, this 30th day of July, 2004.
Sharon Lumlit, City Clerk
City of Lake Elmo
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE
HILL TRAIL NORTH AND 50TH STREET NORTH
STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 12170-03
GEOCODE ADDRESS NAMES UNITS ASSESSMENT
0502921440041 7982 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CHARLES R & HOPE H LEA 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921;440042 8000 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 NORMAN B & JOAN C PURRINGTON 1.0 $2,500.00
05029P11440040 7978 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMES A & DEBORAH M TIERNEY 1.0 $2,500.00
040292$30044 8012 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMIE M & MARY L STOUDT 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330024 8018 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JACK PETER&JUDITH ZE I I ERBERG 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921+330049 8024 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 PAUL E & NANCY N HANSEN 1.0 $2,500.00
040292133101025 8028 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 PATRICK E & DEBORAH M DEAN 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921p30026 8032 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 DAVID W ESCH & 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440039 7972 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 TIMOTHY J & KATHLEEN GENNRICH 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440038 7962 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 PAULINE ANN MALON 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440036 8009 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JASON & SHANNON TACHENY 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921-$30048 8015 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 WAYNE BRAND 1.0 $2,500.00
04029k1330047 8023 HILL TRL LAKE ELMO 55042 PAUL E & NANCY N HANSEN 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330027-ect 8034 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO . 55042 SUSAN K & JOEL A BARKER 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440035 7959 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 DANIEL J & JOAN M LINDSTROM 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330042-ect 8038 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 SUSAN K & JOEL A BARKER 1.0 $2,500.00
040292133'0045 7955 HILL TR CT N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMES R NORMANN ETAL 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440032 7951 HILL TR CT N LAKE ELMO 55042 ALLEN R & VERONICA E SIEDLE 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440033 7949 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 RODNEY B & DOLORES J HARVEY 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440030-ect 7945 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 GEORGE T & BRENDA L TAYLOR 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330031 8048 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROGER WM &CANDICE J JOHNSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440028 7934 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROGER F DIEDRICH TRS 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330022 8051 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CURTISS C JR & AUDRE TALCOTT 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440021 7920 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 SELMER 0 & LOIS A OLSON 1.0 $2,500.00
04029,21330039 8056 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JEFF & KELLY ANN REED 1.0 $2,500.00
04029'21330033 8066 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CLAYTON E & GERALDI MICHAELS 1.0 $2,500.00
05029£21440023 7931 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROLLENE M & DOROTHEA L ARNDT 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330010 8061 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CARL W & JUDITH ABRAHAMSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330003-ect 8012 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO' 55042 MICHAEL P & MAURAA SEVERIN 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330038 8076 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042. THOMAS W & COLLEEN J SWENO 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440015 7990 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 DAVID L BROWN & MARY G BUNDE 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440045-ect PO BOX 31 LAKE ELMO 55042 KENNETH G ISAACSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440016 8004 50TH ST .N LAKE ELMO 55042 MICHAEL P & MAURA A SEVERIN 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330018 2783 LEGION AVE N LAKE ELMO 55042 MARK E & MICHELLE R DEZIEL 1.0 $2,500.00
FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLE
HILL TRAIL NORTH AND 50TH STREET NORTH
STREET RECONSTRUCTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA
COMMISSION NO. 12170-03
0402921330035-ect 8084 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 LOUIS C LE MIRE 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330036-ect 8098 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROGER A & MARY K KOSTELNIK 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330017 8085 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 DANIEL R BURGESS 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330015 8036 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 CHRISTOPHER M SMITH 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220010-ect 8108 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 STEVEN M & VICKIE J IVERSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220013 8017 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 WILLIAM BRADFORD ISAACSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0802921110010 8001 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMES R DOUGLASS & 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220011 8111 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 BONNIE I WEISBROD 1.0 $2,500.00
0802921110009 8017 N 50TH ST LAKE ELMO 55042 ISAACSON CHILDREN'S PROPERTY 0.5 $1,250.00
0802921110002 7851 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 RONALD R & CAROL GRITZMAKER 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220014 8027 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 THOMAS M WALSH & 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220025 8023 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 PAUL E & NANCY N HANSEN 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220015 8033 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 RICHARD K & FRANCES M MYRAN 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220016 8043 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 MARIAN P COULSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220009 8120 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 BRADLEY R & AMY J GUSTAFSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220017 8123 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 RICHARD W & KAREN G NELSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220008 5831 HYTRAIL AVE LAKE ELMO 55042 MICHAEL G & RUTH G SCHRANTZ 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220018 1172 MCKUSICK LN N STILLWATER 55082 JOHN A & DORIS E HANNER-TRUSTE 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220007 8130 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMES A MARCHIO 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220003 8148 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 DONALD WALTER WACKERFUSS 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220024 8151 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CARRIE L BERG & 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220004 8160 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JACQUELINE A HUBENETTE 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220006 8164 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 PATRICK B & KATHLEEN SINCLAIR 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220005 8170 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 J NICHOLAS & LIND T LINSMAYER 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230002 8180 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 STEPHEN BUTZER ETAL -TRUSTEE 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230008 8181 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 WILLIAM MARK & KAREN L WELTER 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230003 8186 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 FREDERICK L PAUL 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230007 8195 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 CHRISTINE M THORNBURY 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230004 8190 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 JAMES P & ROBIN A DILLON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230006 8199 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 GREGORY L & KATHLEEN LOHMER 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921230005 8200 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 DEAN ALLEN & KAREN JOHNSTON 1.0 $2,500.00
0502921440024-ect 8048 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROGER W & CANDICE JE JOHNSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0402921330030-ect 8048 HILL TRL N LAKE ELMO 55042 ROGER W & CANDICE JE JOHNSON 1.0 $2,500.00
0902921220012 8051 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO 55042 JERRY L LEMIRE 1.0 $2,500.00
67.5 $168,750.00'
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: - No 8B.
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: PUBLIC HEARING: Assessment Hearing on 2004 Overlay Project: 49th Street N.,
Jane Circle N., Jasper Avenue N., and Jerome Avenue N.
Background Information for August 17.2004:
In his letter dated August 12, 2004, the City Engineer reported the project is complete. He recommends
adoption of the assessment rate of $1,222.00 per unit (21 assessable units) for this project.
Action Items:
Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2004-070, Resolution
Adopting Assessments for the 2004 Overlay Project as
presented by the City Engineer.
Attachments: - — - - - -
1. Tom Prew letter, dated August 12, 2004 - -
2. Resolution No. 2004-070
3. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment
4. Proposed Assessment Roll
Person responsible:
T.Prew
RUG-13-2004 00:57 TKDA
TKDA
ENGINEERS• AROWTECIS•PLANNERS
August 12, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Re: Assessment Hearing
2004 Overlays
TKDA Commission No. 12996-03
651 292 0083 P.01/02
Ca-9115(6t{
RECEIVED
1500 Piper Jatltay Plaza
444 Cedar Street
Saint Pal, MN 55101.2140
(bat) 292.4400
(651) 292-O0B9 Pax
www.tkda.cam
Dear Mayor and City Council:
This project is complete. The recommended assessment rate is $1,222,00 per unit, which is the
same as we discussed at the public hearing,
The assessment rate is based upon our policy of assessing properties equally within the same
zoning classification. The rate is adjusted for inflation each year.
Project costs were as follows:
Final Project Cost $ 79,079.00
Recommended Assessment $ 25,662.00
City Cost S 53,417.00
A list of property owners is attached.
City Council Action Requested
Adopt the recommended assessment rate of $1,222.00 per unit,
Sincerely:
Thomas D. hew, P. E.
City Engineer
TDP:tlb
Enclosure (By City)
An Employee Owned Compaq? Promoting AllinT7 asAsbnnand Ewa(Oppartunily
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO.2004-o70
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING ASSESSMENT FOR THE 2004 OVERLAY PROJECT:
49TH STREET NORTH, JANE CIRCLE NORTH, JASPER AVENUE NORTH, AND
JEROME AVENUE NORTH
WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council
has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the 2004
OVERLAY PROJECT; 49TH STREET NORTH, JANE CIRCLE NORTH, JASPER
AVENUE NORTH, AND JEROME AVENUE NORTH in Lake Elmo, Minnesota.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE
ELMO, MINNESOTA:
1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part
hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the
lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is herby found to be
benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied
against it.
2. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a
period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the
first Monday in January, 2005, and shall bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent
per annum from the date of the adoption of this assessment resolution. To the first
installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of this
resolution until December 31, 2001. To each subsequent installment when due
shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments.
3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to certification of
the assessment to the County Auditor, pay the whole of he assessment on such
property, with interest accrued to the date of payment, to the City of Lake Elmo,
except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30
days from the adoption of this resolution; and he may, at any time thereafter, pay
to the City of lake Elmo the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid,
with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made.
Such payment must be made before November 15 or interest will be charged
through December 31 of the succeeding year.
4. The Finance Director shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this
assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the
county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as
other municipal taxes.
ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 17th day of August, 2004.
Lee Hunt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Sharon Lumby, City Clerk
CITY OF
LAKE
ELMO
City of Lake Elmo
651 /777-5510
3800 Laverne Avenue North / Lake Elmo, MN 55042
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT
TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN:
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN, that the Lake Elmo City Council will meet in the
council chambers of City Hall, 3800 Laverne Avenue North, at 7:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August
17, 2004, to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment against abutting property for
the 2004 Overlay Project: 40 Street North, Jane Circle North, Jasper Avenue North, and
Jerome Avenue North.
Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing.
The amount to be specially assessed against your particular lot, piece, or parcel of land is
$1,222.00. Such assessment is proposed to be payable in equal annual installments extending
over a period of five (5) years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first
Monday in January 2005, and will bear interest at the rate of 5.25 percent per annum from the
date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest
on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2005. To
each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid
installments.
You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment roll to the Washington
County Auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of
payment, to the City of Lake Elmo. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid
within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. You may at anytime thereafter, pay to the
Washington County Auditor the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest
accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be
made before November 15 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding
year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above, the rate of interest
that will apply is 5.25 percent per year. The right to partially prepay the assessment is not
available.
The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the city administrator's
office. The total amount of the proposed assessment is $25,662.00. Written or oral objections
will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment
unless a signed, written objection is filed with the city administrator prior to the assessment
hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The council may upon such notice
consider any objection to the amount of the proposed individual assessment at an adjourned
meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable.
two printed on recycled paper
Under Minnesota Statutes 435.193 to 435.195, the council may, in its discretion, defer the
payment of this special assessment for any homestead property owner by a person 65 years of
age or older for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments, When deferment of the
special assessment has been granted and is terminated for any reason provided in that law, all
amounts accumulated plus applicable interest become due. Any assessed property owner meeting
the requirements of this law and the policy adopted under it may, within 30 days of the
confirmation of the assessment, apply to the city administrator for the prescribed form for such
deferral of payment of this special assessment on his property.
If an assessment is contested or there is an adjourned hearing, the following procedure
will be followed:
1. The city will present its case first by calling witnesses who may testify by narrative or
by examination, and by the introduction of exhibits. After each witness has testified,
the contesting party will be allowed to ask questions. This procedure will be repeated
with each witness until neither side has further questions.
2. After the city has presented all its evidence, the objector may call witnesses or present
such testimony as the objector desires. The same procedure for questioning of the
city's witnesses will be followed with the objector's witnesses.
3. The objector may be represented by counsel.
4. Minnesota rules of evidence will not be strictly applied; however, they may be
considered and argued to the council as to the weight of items of evidence or
testimony presented to the council.
5. The entire proceedings will be video-taped.
6. At the close of presentation of evidence, the objector may make a final presentation to
the council based on the evidence and the law. No new evidence may be presented at
this point.
7. The council may adopt the proposed assessment at the hearing.
An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes,
Section 429.081, by serving notice of the appeal upon the mayor or city administrator within 30
days after the adoption of the assessment roll and filing such notice with the district court within
ten days after service upon the mayor or city administrator.
Dated at Lake Elmo, Minnesota, this 30th day of July, 2004.
Sharon Lamb , City Clerk
City of Lake Elmo
Proposed Assessment Roll
2004 Overlay Project
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
TKDA Commission No. 12996-01
GEO CODE
1002921220022
1002921210012
1002921210014
1002921210013
1002921210011
1002921210015
1002921210009
1002921210010
1002921210016
1002921220013
9302921330018
1002921220021
0302921330017
1002921220018
1002921220020
1002921210021
1002921210022
1002921210023
1002921210020
1002921220023
1002921210019
1002921210018
Name
ERIC G & SARAN J LARSON
MICHAEL A & PERPETU MCDONALD
-STEVEN W & PAULA R WOOD
CHRISTOPHER A & MONIQUE R KOLB
JOSEPH W & SYLVIA M BAUMANN
JAMES MERIT & RUDEEN S DARST
BRUCE M & SANDY J CALLEN
DENNIS K & CAROL J LARSON
TIN & JENNIFER TRAM
GREG P & KAREN L SCHULZ
EDWIN A & JACQUELINE J RANEY
DAVID J & MARY B JOHNSON
HELMUT S K & JOAN P A PORCHER
RICHARD CARMON & ANN M HAWKINS
THOMAS R JOHNSON JR & Nc x1e1
CHESTER L & MARY PAT MOUTRIE
DENNIS E & BARBARA E MARKIE
FRIEDRICH & IWONA T SRIENC
-JAMES E & CHRISTINE M TREVIS
JOSEPH HART DARDIS
MICHAEL R & ELIZABETH R ZENO
BROOK F DUERR &
Address Street
9191 49THSTN
JANE CIR N
9389 JANE CIR N
9387 ,JANE CIR N
9383 -JANE CIR N
9393 JANE CIR N
9379 :JANE CIR N
9381 JANE CIR N
9395 'JANE CIR N
9160 JANE RD N
4989 JASPER AVE N
4980 JASPER AVE N
4990 _JASPER AVE N
4850 JASPER AVE N
4960 JASPER AVE N
4855 JEROME AVE N
4865 JEROME AVE N
4955 JEROME AVE N
4850 JEROME AVE N
4880 -JEROME AVE N
4860 JEROME AVE N
4870 JEROME AVE N
Proposed
Units Assessment
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 ; $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 • $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 I $ 1,222.00
1 1 $ 1,222.00
0.5 $ 611.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 ° $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
0.5 $ 611.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
1 $ 1,222.00
21 , $ 25,662.00
RUG-13-2004 09:21 TKDA
TKDA
ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS
August 12, 2004
Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Re; Review of Proposed 4-way Stop
Highlands Trail and 59th Street
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
TKDA Commission No. 11979-041
651 292 0083
P.01/01
4S?.ct.
1500 Piper 4at0ay Plaza
444 Cedar West
Saint Paul, MN 55101•2140
(551) 292-4400
(951) 292.0089 Fax
www.tkda.com
Dear Mayor and City Council:
The public works committee has recommended a 4-way stop condition be planed at the intersection of
Highlands Trail and 59th Street, Below is my review.
This intersection is 200 feet south of TH 36. It currently has stop signs on 59th Street. The speed limit on
all the streets is 30 MPH. Highlands Trail is not a collector route in our comprehensive plan, although it
functions as one due to the access to TH 36.
Traffic levels on each leg of 59th Street are very light. There is no stacking of cars at any time of the day.
From my experience there is no problem entering Highlands Trail at this location. A 4-way stop condition
at this intersection is not warranted due to traffic volumes.
Placing a stop sign at an un-warranted intersection results in increased noise due to stopping and
accelerating vehicles; an increased chance that drivers will tend to ignore or miss the sign; and the
tendency for drivers to drive faster to make up for time lost by stopping.
The recommendation for a 4-way stop condition stems from the neighborhoods request for traffic
calndng. In my opinion, a nuance stop sign at this location would have very tittle effect on the overall
speed of traffic on Highlands Trail. Making physical changes to the street is the best method to reduce
vehicle speeds.
Recommendations
Do not install a 4-way stop, as it is not warranted.
Perform a speed study to determine the scope of the speeding problem.
Look in detail at physical changes to the street in order to promote traffic calming.
Sincerely;
Thomas D. Frew, P. E.
City Engineer
TDP;t1b
An Employee Owned Company Promoting, ATHrmativeAction an! Equal Opportunity
TOTAL P.01
Lake Elmo
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Section: City Engineer's Report No. 8D
Agenda Item: VFW Ball Field Lights
Backeround Information for August 17. 2004:
The installation of' the new lights has been recently completed. However, we have encountered a major
delay in securing a route to bring the necessary Xcel power supply to the field. A verbal agreement several
months ago with an adjacent property owner to provide the City with an easement to run the new power
supply unraveled once Xcel presented the actual plan as to how where the new power lines/poles would be
located on that adjacent property owners land. Several alternative concepts were also presented to the
property owner — none of which could be accommodated. We have finally decided to route the power from
a different location, and within the Layton Avenue right-of-way — with increased costs the result.
The previous Xcel contract price to bring the power to the ball field was $9.994.57. The now -revised route
results in a Xcel cost of $12,205.37 — and increase in the project cost of $2,210.80. Council approval of this
project cost increase is respectfully requested.
Action items:
Motion to approve an increase in the cost of the VFW ball field
lights project by $2,210.57 to accommodate a revised routing for
the required Xcel power supply.
Attachments:
None
Person responsible:
City Planner
Time Allocated:
Lake Elmo
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9A
Agenda Item: OP Concept Plan — Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
At its meeting August 9, 2004 the Planning Commission unanimously adopted a recommendation to approve the
subject OP Concept Plan that would divide 172 + acres into 67 single family detached building lots and 92+ acres of
Preserved Open Space (to be held by the Minnesota Land Trust — pending). The Commission had conducted a Public
Hearing on July 12 that resulted in suggestions for modifications to an earlier version of the Concept Plan. In
addition, Planning Staff had identified several OP standards non-compliance issues with that earlier plan. At the
request of the applicant the Commission had tabled the plan on July 12 to allow the applicant to respond to the
Concept Plan issues raised at that meeting.
The Concept Plan considered by the Commission on August 9 (Staff -dated August 5) both mitigated most of the
former OP standards compliance issues, and also addressed many of the issues raised at the Public Hearing. The
primary remaining Op standards non-compliance issue (proposed to be a 4/5 Council OP variance) is the proposed
encroachment of a public street into the 200 foot OP buffer along a short portion of the project's west border. The
Commission discussed this encroachment at length, and offers the Council a recommendation to approve the variance
responsive to the purposes and intent of the OP ordinance. The two commissioners voting against the variance
recommendation both clearly stated that their "nay" votes reflected their issue with the 415 variance process, not the
• applicant's request for the variance.
The issue regarding the applicant's proposal to introduce a "modified rural section" street in some areas of the
neighborhood remains unresolved, pending presentation by the applicant of detailed plans for that design, and a
strategy to ensure that future home owners will not decide to change the design in the future — as happened on the last
OP that featured rural section streets.
Council approval of the Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove OP Concept Plan is recommended. It is also recommended that
the approval Motion include endorsement of a 4/5 variance for the Public road encroachment into the OP buffer (per
August 5, 2004 plans) be supported — with the actual 4/5 variance to be a part of the OP Development Stage/CUP
process.
Person responsible:
Action items:
Motion to adopt Resolution #2004- , approving the OP Concept Plan City Planner
for Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove based on the plans staff -dated August
5, 2004 and the Findings/Recommendation of the Planning Commission.
Further, that the Council endorses the concept of a minor Public street
encroachment into the OP buffer as depicted by the August 5 Plan as an
4/5 OP variance in the future OP Development Stage Plan.
Attachments:
1. Draft Resolution #2004- Approving OP Concept Plan
2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of August 9
3. Staff memo to the Commission of August 5
4. Planning Commission Minutes of July 12
5. Applicant's Graphics — August 5
6. Planning Staff Report of July 12
Time Allocated:
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 2004-071
A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OPEN SPACE CONCEPT PLAN FOR
TAPESTRY AT CHARLOTTE'S GROVE
WHEREAS, at its July 12 and August 9, 2004 meetings, the Lake Elmo Planning
Commission reviewed the Open Space Concept Plan for Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove, a
172 acre site with 67 single family detached lots and 92+ acres of Preserved Open Space,
and recommended approval to the City Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council
does hereby approve and accept the Open Space Concept Plan for Tapestry at Charlotte's
Grove, located at Julep Avenue N. and 45th Street N., for 67single family detached lots,
as staff -dated August 5, 2004, based upon the following findings
1. The Concept Plan is generally consistent with the goals, objectives and
policies of the Comprehensive Plan, as reflected by the Zoning Ordinance,
2. The Concept Plan is consistent with the purpose of the Open Space
Preservation Ordinance.
3. The Concept Plan generally complies with the development standards of the
Open pace Preservation Ordinance.
ADOPTION, by the Lake Elmo City Council this 17th day of August, 2004.
Lee Hunt, Mayor
ATTEST:
Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator
Tapestry Concept Res
MEMO
(August 5, 2004 for the Meeting of August 9, 2004)
To: Lake Elmo Planning Commission
From: Chuck Dillerud
Subject: OP Concept Plan — "Tapestry"
This OP Concept Plan application for 67 single family lots on a site of 172 acres was
tabled by the Planning Commission (at the request of the applicant) on July 12 to allow
the applicant an opportunity to address the Findings of the July 8 Staff Report, and the
Public testimony from the July 12 Public Hearing. Since the subject was not again
considered at the next Planning Commission meeting (July 26 — Canceled), Staff has re -
notified the adjacent property owners regarding the August 9 continued consideration of
the Concept Plan.
The revised Concept Plan (Staff Dated August 5, 2004) is modified from the previous
Concept Plan in the following significant manner:
1. All lot areas are now .75 acres or greater — incompliance with OP standards. The
previous Plan proposed 11 lots of less than .75 acres.
2. The previously identified OP buffers not meeting OP standards along a portion of
the East project border has been enlarged to be in compliance. The south OP
buffer (adjacent to Sunfish Park) remains at 100 feet. Staff continues to find that
this 100 foot buffer (adjacent to a sizable Public open space holding) is responsive
to the purpose and intent of the OP Ordinance, and in compliance.
3. The Concept redesign has significantly modified the layout on the east periphery
of the site to both introduce preserved open space adjacent to a portion of the site
adjacent to the Sunfish Ponds Hamlet, and reduce the linear street and lotting
arrangement previously proposed for the same area.
4. Two future Public street extensions to the North has been reduced to a single
future extension — on the Keats Avenue alignment.
5. The alignment of the private driveway access to the proposed Public street at the
northwest corner of the site has been modified responsive to the City Engineer's
recommendation.
The applicant reports that it has met with the City Engineer regarding the proposed
"modified rural section" street proposal. As of this writing Planning Staff has not
received confirmation of the City Engineer's "approval" of the design — but we will have
a response from the City Engineer by August 9.
The applicant has advised City Staff of a technical OP buffer issue that was not
recognized with the earlier Concept Plan; and, which continues with the August 5
Concept Plan. The proposed Public street that parallels the 2.467 acre "Exception" parcel
in the northwest quadrant of the Concept Plan is set back 100 feet to 200 feet from the
west property line of the site (as shared with the "Exception" parcel) over a distance of
200 feet. Clearly the Exception parcel is not eligible for future OP development based on
parcel area, therefore requiring a 200 foot OP buffer be provided. Combined, those two
facts result in non-compliance of the Plan with the OP standard regarding street location
in an OP buffer only as a right angle crossing.
Staff has discussed this problem with the applicant in search of a design solution without
success. The applicant has advised staff that it intends to seek a 4/5 OP waiver for this
200 foot buffer incursion by a parallel Public street; and, will be prepared to present the
Commission with the basis for the 4/5 waiver on August 9.
With the modifications to the OP Concept Plan reflected by the August 5 drawings, and,
assuming a favorable recommendation regarding the OP 4/5 waiver regarding the short
section of parallel street in the OP buffer, Staff now recommends the following Findings
regarding the Tapestry OP Concept Plan:
1. The Concept Plan is generally consistent with the goals, objectives and policies of the
Comprehensive Plan, as reflected by the Zoning Ordinance.
2. The Concept Plan is consistent with the purpose of the Open Space Preservation
Ordinance.
3. The Concept Plan generally complies with the development standards of the Open Space
Preservation Ordinance.
Based on those Findings, Staff recommends approval of the Tapestry OP Concept Plan
based on the Findings proposed and the Concept drawings dated Staff dated August 5,
2004 , including a OP 4/5 waiver of the OP buffer standard to allow a 200 foot segment
of Public street to encroach 0-100 feet in and parallel to a 200 foot buffer.
The Commission is respectfully reminded that the previous Concept Plan version did
comply with OP buffering requirements along the common border with Hamlet on
Sunfish Lake OP. The applicant's Concept Plan modifications in that regard have been
exclusively responsive to the stated concerns of the Hamlet property owners — not the OP
Ordinance.
Excerpt Lake Elmo Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2004
OP Concept Plan: TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
OP CONCEPT PLAN — TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
Continued from July 12, 2004
The Planner said the applicant requested tabling the application at the July 12 meeting to address
ordinance standards and design related matters. He reported that a revised Concept Plan was
received by the City with the following changes
• OP buffer distance was increased to 200 feet for several lots in the northeast corner of the
site.
• In the original plan's southeast corner there were 11 lots with area less than .75 acre. In
the revised plan all lots are at least .75 acre in area.
• The significant redesign of the eastern part of the plat to increase the OP Preserved Open
Space adjacent to Sunfish Hamlet OP. He noted that this was not an OP compliance -
required modification, but rather in response to Public testimony at the previous
Commission meeting.
• The Planner reported that the applicant and City Engineer have discussed the proposal for
a "modified rural section" street in some area of the site. He noted that the Engineer was
not necessarily opposed to the concept, but requested further design details at the
Development Stage before endorsing the design.
The Planner said that in the earlier design, he missed a public street at the west edge of site within
the 200 feet buffer of an existing residence. A street like that is allowed if it goes across at right
angles. Various approaches have been discussed, but the applicant will make arguments for it
being a better design to have it there.
Staff Findings:
1. The Concept Plan is generally consistent with goals objectives policies.
2. The Concept Plan is consistent with the purpose and intent of the OP Ordinance.
3. The Concept Plan generally complies with the OP Ordinance.
The Planner advised that if the Planning Commission fmds the noted road encroachment in to the
200 foot buffer to be a problem greater than an reasonable use of the site resources, a finding
should be made in that regard even though the necessary 4/5 OP variance is a City Council
determination.
The Planner recommended approval of the OP Concept Plan and the 4/5 variance for the road
encroachment.
Commissioner Sedro asked if this plan meets the percentage of contiguous open space.
The Planner said it meets the requirement that 60% of open space be in parcels of at least 10
acres.
Commissioner Johnson asked what happens if the transfer of property to Berschens does not
occur.
The Planner said that is still a consideration. If the transfer does not occur, this plan will have to
be reduced by six lots.
Darren Senn, Senn and Youngdahl, Lead Designer
Mr. Senn said he and his team received good input from commissioners, city staff, and neighbors.
Excerpt Lake Elmo Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2004
OP Concept Plan: TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
The applicant went back to the drawing board and came back with an even better plan. He
suggested that this plan better creates a neighborhood as demonstrated by the graphics. The 200
feet buffer in the northeast caused the road to be changed, curved, and looped creating an even
better neighborliness in that corner. The view corridor has been opened on the east side, in the
middle of the plat. Circulation was alleviated around the entryway, creating three channels
instead of just one. It will be safer and traffic is reduced.
Commissioner Schneider asked if rural road cross -sections can be maintained over time if home
owners attempt to modify them.
Mr. Senn said the objective of the rural sections is aesthetic and functional. He said his
engineering staff and the City Engineer have met to discuss it. The rural section concept is where
many cities are heading, so surface water infiltrates. It is more environmentally sensitive and
rural in nature. However, he said they may choose a more urban street section in the denser areas
of the plat.
Commissioner Berg asked about the road setback encroachment into the OP buffer.
Mr. Senn said there are substantial trees in a pine grove near an existing old wagon road. There is
even an old wagon they might keep as a feature there. There is also a 30 feet grade change going
up to where the exception parcel lies.
Commissioner Deziel asked why that portion of the road could not be completely eliminated.
Mr. Senn said he believes the alternative circulation that results from that road segment (which
encroaches into the OP buffer) alleviates some of the traffic for several homes in the
neighborhood. The road in that location is practical and enhances scenic value.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the development is expected to produce 700 trips per day.
The Planner said that 10 vehicle trips per day is the average for a single family residence. He said
45th Avenue North has a capacity of 5000 vehicles per day. .
Commissioner Sedro asked if trails are on the revised plan.
Mr. Senn said they are, but in a different color. They will design the trails within the context of
the ordinance. They want it to be purposeful with connectivity to the community and the park. It
will be dealt with on a more intensive basis at the next OP stage.
Commissioner Sessing asked about flag lots.
The Planner said conventional code does not really apply in an OP Development, and that the
City has permitted that design in prior OP projects.
Commission Deziel noted differences with the road layout, with multiple curves rather than
squared intersections. He said he understands the niceness of the curve but it is not always bad to
have a stop sign in a pedestrian area. He said a curve takes more impervious surface and we lose
some contiguity of open space. It might be more desirable to have an intersection with a stop
sign.
Mr. Senn said that it is excellent to think that an intersection slows traffic and makes it safer. He
Excerpt Lake Elmo Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2004
OP Concept Plan: TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
said a curve could also serve as a landscape feature in the northeast section of the plat, but that
squaring some intersections may be beneficial.
Commissioner Schneider asked if it is still the applicant's their intention to site the houses at the
front of the lots along Sunfish Park.
Mr. Senn said they would be sited closer to the rear to the woods.
The Planner said the developers are constrained as to home location in that area by the buffer.
Commissioner Helwig asked if the Berschens property is not available what the applicant will do.
Mr. Youngdahl said there will be six fewer lots, and an alternative access to 45"' is available.
Lake Elmo resident, Jerry Marsolek requested to speak even though he spoke at the Public
Hearing in July. He said he just wanted to commend Senn and Youngdahl for working with the
neighbors.
A letter from Mr. and Mrs. Skeie was read aloud by Commissioner Sessing. It is attached to
these minutes.
Commissioner Deziel commended Senn and Youngdahl for listening to the land and to the
neighbors.
Commissioner Johnson also stated that she appreciated developers listening well, and
commended them for it.
M/S/P, Sedro/Johnson, To recommend approval of the OP Concept Plan for Tapestry at
Charlotte's Grove based the Finding listed in the August 5, 2004 Planner's Memo to the
Commission, and the plans staff -dated August 5, 2004.
Commissioner Sessing said that the road through the OP buffer zone is his only concern.
VOTE: 9:0.
Commissioner Pelletier said she does not necessarily want a road in the buffer but thinks it is
needed to keep down congestion, especially with only one entrance and exit to the development.
Commissioner Johnson would like to keep the road as designed through the buffer for traffic flow
because it is important to preserve trees. She went to the site and observed the trees and thinks
they should be preserved.
The Planner explained that the process for keeping this road design is not like a regular zoning
variance, but peculiar to the OP Ordinance.
M/S/P, Johnson/Pelletier, To recommend support of a four -fifths OP waiver to allow a Public
road to encroach in the OP buffer zone in order to preserve trees and decrease traffic flow.
VOTE: 7:2
Commissioner Sedro noted that her nay vote was only symbolic because she does not support a
four -fifths waiver loophole in the OP ordinance.
Excerpt Lake Elmo Planning Commission Draft Meeting Minutes of August 9, 2004
OP Concept Plan: TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
Commissioner Sessing stated that his nay vote was only to indicate his opposition to the OP
ordinance 4/5 variance provision, and not reflective of the applicant's design in this case.
Page 1 of 1
Chuck Dillerud
From: Mark & Janet Skeie [mjskeie@earthlink.net]
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 12:06 PM
To: Chuck Dillerud
Subject: Re: Planning Commision/"Tapestry At Charotte's Grove"
We have seen the new plans for the "Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove". We continue to be impressed by the
willingness of the developer to find a working compromise. We understand the difficulty in pleasing everyone.
The new plan has resolved many of our concerns. We do understand from some of our neighbors of on
going issues with additional buffering between the Hamlet on Sunfish Lake and Tapestry at Charlotte's
Grove. We do encourage all parties to continue the sprit of listening and compromise which has been with this
process to date.
Thank you for your leadership on this difficult matter.
Mark and Janet Skeie
4156 Kindred Way
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
651-777-9578
8/9/2004
AMENDED R: APPROVED: 08/09/04
City of Lake Elmo
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes of July 12, 2004
Chairman Helwig called to order the Planning Commission meeting at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS
PRESENT: Deziel, Johnson, Sessing, Berg, Sedro, Schneider, Pelletier, Ptacek. STAFF PRESENT:
Martin Rafferty, City Administrator; Chuck Dillerud, City Planner; Kimberly Schaffel, Recording
Secretary.
tube OF ALLEGIANCE
AGEN
Add 8A W
MINUTES
M/S/P, Sessing/Dezie VOTE: 8:0.
s. M/S/P, Johnson/Deziel, To accept the agenda as amended. VOTE:
PUBLIC HEARING: VA ^ NCE FROM OHW — OLSEN
The City Planner introduced the :.placation for a variance from the S
allow reconstruction of a deck with the setback from OHW of D
of approximately 48' from Ordinary Water where 150 fee
applicant has removed a deteriorated deck',..nstructed in th
location without a variance. The new deck w'=, d be 2 fe
width. He reported that the DNR does not objec
based upon Findings in the staff report.
reland Standards of the Code to
's Lake. The deck lies a minimum
s required. He reported that the
70's but can not rebuild in the same
her from the OHW across a portion of the
ce. The Planner recommended approval
AT 7:07 p.m. THE CHAIRMAN OPENED .:^'1 PUBLI AR1NG.
No testimony was offered.
AT 7:08 P.M. THE CHAIRM CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARIN
Commissioner Deziel s.:. photos depict foliage screening of the original d'' . and the house from the
lake and he appreci,.. s
M/S/P, Ptac•.dSessing, To recommend approval to allow reconstruction of a deck a 8' from OHW in
accord. - with applicants' plans staff dated July 8, 2004 and the three Findings in the .staff Report.
VOT 9:0.
VPUBLIC HEARING: OP CONCEPT PLAN — TAPESTRY at Charlotte's Grove
The Planner presented the application for an Open Space Preservation Concept Plan for a residential
subdivision. He explained the review process for an OP Development Project as a three -step process.
The first stage is a Concept Plan. The applicant provides the city with an idea of what the intentions are.
There are certain quantitative standards that must be met. With approval of a Concept Plan, there is no
right except to come back to the city with a Preliminary Plat/Development Stage Plan with stricter
requirements. The Final Plan and Plat go directly to the City Council.
The Planner said this site is east of Lake Jane along 4511' Avenue North, West of Hamlet on Sunfish Lake,
and east of Public Works and the landfill site. The plan is for 173 acres which includes a portion of the
Berschen parcel to the west. The proposal is to construct a single family detached neighborhood of 67
home sites with preserved Open Space in the center and west portion with the potential for future access
to the north and west. Sunfish Park is located to the south.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 1
AMENDED & APPROVED: 08109104
The Planner said that standards are different now compared to when Hamlet on Sunfish Lake was
developed. Buffering and lot size requirements have changed substantially.
The Planner noted that 200 feet minimum buffer/structure setback to the north as required because the
land abutting is not eligible for OP Development. 100 feet of buffer with screening is shown to the east
because the adjacent parcel is an OP Development. The plan shows 100 feet buffer to the south, which is
public property, a park that will never be developed. The Commission allowed it in the Plat of Whistling
Valley. The residential lot in the southeast corner is proposed as .6 or .65 acre, but our Code now
specifies .75 acre, larger than in Hamlet.
The Planner said the plan calls for modified rural road cross section indicating how the roads would be
constructed. They would have ditches and no storm sewer. We have one OP development that has rural
sections. We had difficulties there, which is why we removed it from the ordinance. The homeowners_
did not like them. He said that with the rural road section, reduced lot sizes, and the 100 feet buffer to the
south, the City Council can only approve this Concept Plan by 4/5 waiver.
The Planner noted that VBWD has concerns with land -locked water basins on the site. Our City Engineer
raised issue with the rural section but is willing to listen to the developer explain how they can make it
work. The engineer said the intersection on the northwest portion of the site is a concern because it has
been essentially a private driveway until now. The open space on the northwest side was placed there so
the neighboring property can become part of the open space. That portion will become part of the
conservation easement that can be fanned forever. This plan is potentially transferring development
rights with city owned land to the north. if that does not work, the 16 extra acres will be removed from
the plan and the development will be reduced by 6 residences.
The Planner said that Findings should be that the application is consistent with the comprehensive plan,
that it meets the standards of the OP Ordinance, and that the plan meets the intents and purposes of the
ordinance. He said it is difficult to make a finding for compliance
The Planner said the applicant has held at least one neighborhood meeting for this Concept Plan. The
application does meet the standards of the Code.
Commissioner Deziel asked if the Concept Plan meets the standards, are the Commissioners compelled to
vote for it.
The Planner responded that the Findings are three -fold, but the Planning Commission still does not have
to vote for it. If the applicant wishes to apply for the 4/5 waiver, that should not be held against them.
Commissioner Johnson asked if the applicant had shared any alternative plan for access to this property if
the Berschens'/City property transaction does not take place.
The Planner responded that the current driveway has an easement on it so the current access plan should
not be a problem.
Commissioner Johnson stated that if that were the case, the home on the corner of 45th Street and Julep
Avenue would have a major development entrance very close to their house.
The Planner responded that the City and developer are aware of this, and there should be room to be able
to have the entrance more west of the home.
Commissioner Deziel asked if the easement to the north could become an extension of the road on the
plan.
The Planner said it could, potentially. The Planner suggested that the Plat of Hamlet on Sunfish Lake
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 2
APPENDED & APPROVED: 08102l04
may have had a road intended but it was not platted as a street but as an outlot.
Commissioner Berg said he talked to the former City Planner. In that discussion she said there was a plan
for a road easement there at Hamlet on Sunfish Lake.
The Planner said it did not happen that way.
Mark Youngdahl, Managing Partner in St. Croix Farms and partner in Senn and Youngdahl
Mr. Youngdahl said that he and his partner live in the valley and are friendly with Lake Elmo, his
children play little league here. He said he understands that certain new developments come with mixed
feelings. His company has done work here. Their objective is to solicit input from the Planning
Commission and the community. He said that a project of this scale deserves it. They met twice with
homeowners from Hamlet on Sunfish Lake, He said that he and his partner are passionate about homes
and designs, they are builders and developers. They emphasize historic, nostalgic, timeless styles.
Mr. Youngdahl introduced his team. Darren Senn is the Lead Designer. Alan Kretman and Greg Moris
are engineers. He noted that rural ditches may actually cost more than curb and gutter.
Darren Senn, Lead Designer
Mr. Senn said their ideals call for listening to the land, paying attention to the design of the land, streets,
and neighborhoods. He said his company had a part in the creation of Fields of St. Croix. They are
members of the community. They want to do good work. He thanked staff for their gracious assistance.
He thanked the Hamlet residents for their respect, concerns, and for sharing their thoughts with them.
Mr. Senn explained the basis for the design. He said he thinks in space and visuals, not in numbers. He
is planning for the visual appeal of the land after their footprints have been there. He drove around Lake
Elmo, and knows an objective in the city is to maintain view corridors. It is incredibly scenic. He noted
that a lot of rear houses are seen from the view corridor, so his idea was to move the houses out of the
view. That is one of his objectives. Another is to maintain the natural beauty of the site. It is very
scenic. This plan maintains the meadow in the center and moves houses to the perimeter. The open space
is divided into two areas; the northern area is for more active use. They wanted the land to be dedicated
to something that maintains the Lake Elmo identity, so it will remain agricultural with a tree orchard,
farming, or horse grazing. The southern portion is seen differently, and their goal is to maintain it in the
existing state. Photos in the packet give examples of Open Space restored with prairie grasses preserved
like in Jackson Meadow. They would like to maintain what currently exists because it is naturally
beautiful or they have thought of it becoming more like a native prairie restoration. He said the objective
was to be able to experience the natural beauty as you drive, ride, or walk through it. The western portion
of the site is partially wooded with a natural valley there without significant trees. Typically with streets
on either side the usual preference would be for it to become mowed lawn. Instead the street indicates the
center with prairie or meadow on both sides of the street, and driveways disappearing behind the grasses,
making them more invisible. That is their Landscape Concept. Open Space maintained is critical so that
it patinas over time with little maintenance required. Additionally they would like to have the landscape
blend with the natural and manicured environments, The southwest corner lots are about one -tenth an
acre smaller than the others, and have a slightly different streetscape. Those houses would be slightly
closer to the street, and he and his team are still working on that design.
Mr. Senn said that they design and build homes that are timeless and recognizable. They feel that it is
important that architecture fit with the land. The homes speak for themselves. He said they design four-
sided architecture, and all are designed with consistent materials. They also build with the idea not to see
rear houses. Many He said they pay special attention to how rear elevations are designed. Their objective
also shows them all fronting the streets.
Commissioner Pelletier asked about a part of the map on the east in the middle.
Mr. Senn said it is a high elevation point, wetland, gathering area, and scenic view with a roadway around
it. He also pointed out a lot with a beautiful grove of trees in the center. They plan a rural authentic
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 3
AVUIENDED & APPROVED: 08109/04
farmhouse there, as an anchor that will appear to have always been there.
Commissioner Schneider asked if the two lots in the Conservation Easement are slated for the Moris
Family.
Mr. Senn said they are.
Commissioner Schneider said that with those lots abutting the park, it seemed like a big asset for that
homeowner and nobody else.
Mr. Senn pointed out that all community members are provided access to the park through the trail
system. It is a huge amenity for all. They would also provide access to the pathway for Hamlet residents
to enjoy.
Commissioner Schneider said it is too densely wooded there for access to the park.
Commissioner Deziel because of trees, the view shed might be more desirable for the residents and
neighbors.
Mr. Senn said they wanted to maintain the center for open space due to significant scenic value. It will
also reduce impact of construction in that area. The park is densely wooded there, its value occurs inside
the park. He said the created several diagrams to be sure they got the best layout. Their design objectives
drove the plan.
Commissioner Sedro asked about several blank areas on the maps. One is an exception.
Mr. Senn said that two are lots, and one is the specified farmhouse with an original appearance. The
exception has an existing house and barn which also adds to the scenic value.
Commissioner Helwig asked where the rest of the homes back there are located,
Mr. Senn said he thinks there are two more homes back there on the southwest side.
Commissioner Schneider said the developer wants to reduce back sides of houses but Hamlet residents
have full impact.
Mr. Senn said that is an issue the neighborhood meeting revealed, and the team is working on mitigation.
It was their objectives that drove them, and the process brought up the neighbor's concern. Hamlet was
developed with a similar principal. Under the City's guidelines, with the understanding of how homes
abut with another OP district, he said he thought they were doing something that was okay. He and his
team met with neighbors at City Hall and once on site. The neighbors were concerned and he would like
to mitigate their footprint in those neighboring backyards.
Commissioner Schneider said the view shed is on the 45th Street corridor, not as you are coming into the
development. Wildlife is deterred from going into the park to the south.
Mr. Youngdahl said that one of their objectives is to listen to comments and attempt to redraw the plan to
address those concerns.
Commissioner Pelletier said she loves the builder's homes but has an issue with Preserved Open Space
because of the larger lots in the center, the preservation of wildlife, and so much curving with the roads.
Mr. Senn asked if the OP is in the wrong place. He said they thought 300 feet of buffer was a good idea.
Commission Sedro said the VBWD Engineer lists points such as runoff, among other things.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 4
ANIENDEO 8, APPROVED. 011109104
The Planner explained that engineering and runoff will be addressed in the next phase.
Commissioner Deziel asked if the plan for the roads was for rural section throughout or just in parts.
Mr. Youngdahl said they do not know yet. They would like to create a system that is better, more scenic,
or rural than curb and gutter. He said they are seeking a gauge for understanding in order to design it
appropriately.
Commissioner Deziel asked if the developer had considered rainwater gardens.
Mr. Senn said they are a consideration for stormwater runoff.
Commissioner Deziel said smaller lots and rural ditches go against each other. Ditches take a lot of space
away from littler lots.
Greg Moris, Engineer
Mr. Moris said there is actually ten feet of easement, What they are looking at now is a scenario that
stretches out the ditch but makes it shallower.
Mr. Senn said the reason for rural roads is design oriented. They want Tapestry to look like a rural
neighborhood. At higher density points, we might need curb and gutter, and may blend two systems.
Commissioner Sedro has no doubt they can make it look great but asked about enforcement. Would that
be in the Covenants?
Mr. Youngdahl said their concerns are to create beauty and for it to last. There are a couple of different
ways they can address that, one will be in the Covenants which will be very clear on it, especially in
buffer areas, through the Association documents.
The Planner said the subdivision of Cloverdale Farms in neighboring Baytown, is an example of how
yards are treated. There are some rural sections in there. From a staff perspective, they discussed the
same question, how do you insure it? He said the most effective method is in the Covenants. The
Planner discussed with the developers how to do it. Plus our engineer has to be convinced.
Chairman Helwig asked the size of Hamlet's buffer back then.
The Planner said he does not believe it was 200 feet.
Chairman Helwig said he thinks 100 or 75 feet.
Planner said he recollects it was less.
Commissioner Schneider asked if all properties are being shown with houses located to the front of the
lot, closer to the street.
Mr. Senn said they think so, in order to move houses closer to create a neighborhood while creating a
larger buffer. One resident, Jerry, had a concern about elevations of some lots compared to theirs. Mr.
Senn said they have designed a couple of homes with lower roofs to reduce that impact. Their idea is to
be building to the street setback line.
Commissioner Schneider asked if they would be building walkouts.
Mr. Senn said they will work with the land. They are not huge walkout fans. He said houses at grade at
the rear are an enhancement.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 5
AMENDED & APPROVED: 08/00/04
Commissioner Sedro said it is mentioned in the Staff Report that this parcel is within the 1,000 feet
Shoreland Overlay, and topographic division might them. She asked if that was for wastewater treatment.
The Planner said a constructed wetland is recognized as sewer by the City Planner, but not for the DNR.
The Planner does not think there is a Shoreland an issue here.
Commissioner Sedro asked how far the drainfields are from Sunfish Lake.
Mr. Moris said he will get that information for the Commission.
The Planner said if that were an issue, Hamlet would be an issue.
Mr. Senn said they would like to come back with a revised plan answering all questions and issues.
THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:19 P.M.
Jerry Marsolelc, 4212 Kindred Way, Hamlet
Mr. Marsolek said he has concerns. What is a plus for Tapestry is a disaster for Hamlet. He said there is
a natural wildlife corridor running north to south on the east side of the parcel, yet there is more buffer to
the west. They should free space in the east. Tapestry is not impacting anyone on the west, just us on the
east. The elevation in the house across from him will be fifteen feet higher. Their should be some
screening there. There are wooded areas but some are open so trees and berms won't be practical.
Dennis Kelly, 4233 Kindred Way, Hamlet
Setbacks on the east are only 100 feet but open space is behind their lots, the applicants should have the
same amount on their parcel. He said the traffic situation presents a concern because people going to
Stillwater will go across 4763 to Kimbro to Lake Elmo Avenue. He asked about paving Kimbro north of
476 and 50`h, and where will that come in the process?
Daryl Vosberg, 9436 Jane Road
Mr. Vosberg lives near Lake Jane. He understands the concerns from people in Hamlet. Access out of
this development is right onto 45th Street and Lake Jane Trail, otherwise you have to go up Keats to 36.
He is concerned with traffic load. He said this plan does not abide by the ordinance that is in place now.
He asked if there is a way to get a second access into this development.
Dan Beech, 4384 Kimbro Avenue North
Mr. Beech said he lives north of Hamlet, just to the northeast of Tapestry. He lived here before all the
other neighborhoods, and got to know many nice people. He reemphasized the wildlife corridor. He said
this plan offers a pocket of open space not corridors. When one looks at the aerial, there are runoff
concerns. There is a wetland on the rear of his property. Herds of deer and turkeys won't be able to come
through anymore. He wondered if the wells for this development will be impacting his and his neighbor's
wells. He is worried about the groundwater impact and septic considerations.
Jeff Mods, 914 16m Avenue SE, Forest Lake
He said he watched the wildlife while living on this property for 28 years, and what he notices is a nice
thing. Turkeys go where they need and so do deer. This plan is attractive to him and his family. Wildlife
requires food, water, and cover. The majority of the whitetail come from the park when the crops are cut.
That migration occurs on the west side of the property between Moris and Berschens. There are 60 to 70
deer, and they stay in the woods as long as they can. There are natural deer trails on the northern portion
of the property. Hay has been planted there the last 15 years because soybeans and corn eroded. Ag
crops are still being planted further north. The tree farm is next and provides natural cover. Deer travel
through cover to food sources and back to cover. Tree farm, Riecks, Judd, and back to the woods on
Moris. Movement of the deer herd is through the cover not the middle of the development.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004 6
AMENDED & APPROVED: 0III09/04
Mark Skeie, 4156 Kindred Way
He said he has lived over five years in Hamlet, and there were 22 dear last winter, one dozen per day.
Their patterns must have shifted with moving of traffic, and the herd has grown. There is also a pack of
coyotes moving north to south. Some wildlife consideration would be appreciated.
THE CI-IAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:33 PM.
The Planner said he was not going to address deer traffic patterns or design aspects. Traffic is dealt with
by the City Engineer, and he calculates perhaps 700 trips per day at full build out, about 10 trips per
residence per day. Trips are half in and half out. 45th Street North at the street light can handle up to
5,000 vehicles per day, the city is a long way from it even with this new development. 45th is a Collector
Street and perhaps will be a state aid street some day, it is meant to carry traffic. Klondike will be
surfaced soon. He said it is already a state aid street designed to carry traffic. He agreed that a second
access would be nice. Potentially three additional accesses are available should they be necessary in the
future. Carriage Station has two with 110 residences. The city has designed the discontinuous street
system for privacy issues.
The Planner said that runoff into the pond is not addressed at Concept State. That is a second stage
consideration. The city has the 1% rule for stormwater post -development as what was there pre -
development. That standard applies for the watershed, and will have to be met.
Mr. Senn requested tabling for a couple of weeks.
Commissioner Ptacek explained that the Planning Commission is a recommending body but if it fits the
ordinance it is recommended. The individual has rights to develop as long as it meets our objective
criteria. He said the developers did a pretty good job and it looks like a great project. He said the
farmstead lot looks like a flag lot, and if the intent and spirit of the developer is to create more of a sense
of community the two individual lots don't blend.
/M/S/P, Ptacek/Sessing, To table. VOTE: 8:0.
"�I THE CHAIR CALLED A RECESS AT 9:45 P.M.
THE MEETING RECONVENED AT 9:53 P.M.
LL"UaLJ iw LUt-aJILC
Th- tanner reminded the Commission of their direction to staff to publish Notice to include Fa
Enterta ent Centers as a Conditional Use in the Limited Business Zone. He reported tha . rospective
purchaser o u e Dolan Marine site had provided a definition of "Family Entertainme .ienter", and how
they would ad.r- such a use on the Dolan site. The Planner reported that he ha' . odified the definition
by one clause, and pr ' . ed a section of the LB District Table to include th,. -rse as conditional with a
maximum square foot buihi ea reflective of the Dolan site. He ou. "ed that the resulting maximum
building area for this use is larger all other Limited Busine , ' onditional Uses.
The proposed definition is not subject to Baring.
Commissioner Ptacek said the code was just e deg Conditional Uses for the Limited Business.
He said his cautiousness was the size of r resultant Family rtainment Center facility and the
intensity of activities of the use for .: trips and septic use.
The Planner explained
questions will be , s by the City at that time about impacts of the CUP request.
THE - /• IRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 8:59 P.M.
Au madman., '6Y Lio'OffCretl.
Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 12, 2004
and when the Family Entertainment atnendment i' : ' . ed to the Code,
7
,6,1.--STROP
/ UERSCHENS
j
CONSERVATION/'
EASEMENT
16 CCL ACRES
SUNFISH PAR!
LY0'PWJA
107. W SF
215'' ACRES
C E V ION
EAS T
AA,25e Sf 4BACREE
TIO %
OPEN SPACE
J6a16 sr
LOT
tapestry
OPEN SPACE)
OPEN jSPACE
I II
I I I I I I I 1
lit
I wn) 1 mn '1 "is 11 m1 I 0 l of I I M
a'.JNa`vI 1! r l l iviwalt' 15AM5 aL 1 I Gyswsai. l I im 4 U l I o°i 'i l 1 wi:mv I
Norman
OPEN SPACE
CONCEPTUAL SITE LAYOUT (SUBJECT TO MODIFICATION)
u1M5
'lf3R_
klatip IL Pee.
_
MM11.. Twa,
ag
6007B'er
r-
r
OPEN SPAC
1
vnxos prvl Y "IA"'
TRACT(
a¢vlNtamml / r BGn0TC\
3 10 1
▪ Emelt ^M i
i
0' 100' 200'
11
/
AREA LOCATION MAP
„I PROJECT
TAPESTRY
451% STREET NORTH& JULEP AVENUE
LAKE EIMO. MN
EXISTING INFORMATION
EXISTING SURVEY INFORMATION PROVIDED BY CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING. INC EXISTING TOPOGRAPHIC
INFORMA110% PROVIDED BY WASHINGTON COUNTY. PRCTERRA DESIGN ASSOCIATES, INC SRALLNOT BE
RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ACCURACY OF INFORMATIONPRONOEDBYOTHERS
MORE. PROPERTY.
MINUS EXCEPTION.
TOTAL MOMS PROPERTY:
BUR0CHENS PROPERTY'
TOTAL SITE AREA:
OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION DISTRICT (OP)
MINIMUM DISTRICT REQUIREMENTS
STMIOTURE REQUIREMENTS.
MAXIM UM BUILDING NEIOM(PRNNRY STRUCTURE)
MAI(IMUM BUILDING NEWSY (ACCESSORYBTRUCi11RE1
LOT REQUIREMENTS
MINIMUM LOT WIDTH
MINIMUM LOT IJNE
MAXIMUM OCT COVERAGE:BUILDABLE LAND AREA
MINIMUM LOT SIZE(INDMDUAL WELL AND SEPTIC SYSTEM)
MINIMUM LOT SIZE (INDIVIDWLL WELL AND COMMUNITY SYSTEM)
RSINRE09ETBACKS FRO& PROPERTY LINEN MRINewv SEPNminim
FRONT a3C
SIDE =15' OR 10% OF LOY WIDTH
(WHICH EVERTS GREATER)
SIDE CORNER
REAR
ARTERIAL STREET
O UFFEY0 ZONES.
BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE OF ABUTTING PARCEL AND ANY STRUCTURE
OR DRIVING SURFACE WITHIN PROPOSED OP DEVELOPMENT
WERE PROPOSED OP DEVELOPMENT ABUTS EXISTING RESIDENTIAL
✓ evaaPA@NTNor ELIGIBLE FOR FUTURE DEVELOPMENT UNDER OP
ORDINANCE)
BETWEEN PROPERTY LINE OP ABUTTING PARCEL ANDAMS STRUCTURE
O R DRIVING SURFACE WITHIN PROPOSED 07 DEVELOPMENT
(WERE PROPOSED OP DEVELOPMENT ABUTS EXISTING OP
DEVELOPMENT OR LAND PARCEL ELIGIBLEFOR FUTURE
DEVELOPMENT UNDER OP ORDINANCE)
P ESERVN0➢RN SP4CE0SAN04R0T
REQUIRED PRESERVED OPEN SPACE (AT LEAST 50% OF TOTAL
BUILDABLE AREA)
WELDABLE LAND AREA CALCULATIONS.
N
N
=IW
=636T AC
SITE AREA= ITMAT3 AC
LESS DELINEATED W£TLANDAREA 020.7/95 R1= 2.100 AD
LESS SLOPES petard TO OR SPEATER TRAM U5%SLOPE 1105 M61= 3 ST AC.
TOTAL 'MUTABLE AREA • 16TA4AC
BUILDABLE LAND AREA & DENSITY
ANALYSIS/ CALCULATIONS
DENSITY CALSY/LPT
—tI
•
1551QU ACRES
2.q4/ACRES
155 412 ACRES
10000 ACRES
072473 ACRES
= 35
FROM GRADE ATPEAK12Y
FROM GARAGE DOOR. 14' ; x'
- PREPARED FOR:
co 01
oo
N N
REGISTRATION:
I hereby certify Net lM.e
plea. Bpoo0eaSon,w
report was prepared by
me erondermy diesel
supervision, sod that
am a duly Licensed
Professional Engineer
under the laws of the
Maio of Minnesota.
61018.
WA
�30' PRE PARED SY:
G% N 3 6 tl
_IOC - �C
ESE
Gg&
1IVq
rraf m
�y31
S � Y
REVISIONS.
No. Defer !kw
1. 00.02,04 REV TENSITY CALOR
2 0R2201 CONCEPT LAYOUT
3. 0003.04 REV.CONCEPT LAYOUT
4. GROOM PER WWERT REQUEST
tU
M O
up
OG
x�,..1 1 x o H
1w<
LING UAVTDENSITV SHALL BE SEMEN ME0000AITB
PERfWI HOGROSS ACRES OF BINLDABLE LAND E qp1. I Fg' O
MAGMDM DWELLBIO OIOT DENSITY: i E N U9'
1(1.14 AO. X 10 Wen / 40 AL.=80 L6 HINTS Fi
PROPOSED CONCEPT SITE DATA
ANALYSIS & CALCULATIONS
NUMBER OF LOTS e01 A
400 000' TOTAL LOT ACREAGE (2,BT6A10 S.F.) -OM AO i
TOTFLPRESERVECOPENSPM0403.ST AC REWME-0) = MU AC0A7IAc I0PENSPAOEEAEEME ).69A0 AC. A
LINEAR FEET OF ROAD=15.005LP.
LINEARFEET OFPAVEDTRAIS = 16065LF. 0
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE OF ROW (30E W26 P.)=10,13AC,
APPROINMATEPRCPOSECOEPTICTREATMENT AREA Raoul/Et" v3 ECACRES
6 Urzwley
08aABT
04025 -
MIS
GDM
06.29.04
boa r•
CL1
Dear Mr-. Dillerud:
I thotighi. it might be helpful i‘f I' summarized .in wilting the adjustments we have inade to btu
original subtilissibn,,, t hope these adjustments will answer all the concerns expressed from oui•s�,
July 12 planning comnussioii Meeting and from your staff report dated July 8 2004. If there are
any outstanding issues that aren't addressed here, please notify me at your,, , earliest corrveiuence:;.','
Lots 21-24' at the northeast cortier of the parcel have been adjitst'ed so that flie home -
structtue woulkl be 200' from the property line. ';.;.:; • .' ' �. ' ."
Lots 30-34 have been Moved to create a large open spacebuffer betwecii Tapestry and,, .
Hamlet:op. Sunfish.Lake: This has, been dope to alleviate the concerns 'of the, residents' at
Sunfish Lake, '',.''
H. 3.;. All lot'sizes have been,'adjusted.to be % of an; acre or greater: as,:required by Lake Ejmo's
OP O'rdirlanee '
The geoineti-ics at the intersection of the easement roadway to the south have been:.
adjusted per then egineer's request: , ..• ,
By adding the road through the northern• open space area, we have redueed the trips per -
day past lots 43, 44 and 45,-or lots 1; 2, and 3 on the previois submissidn. -" :'
Ian addition to the•above stated items, there are a few other issues I would like to bring to yotmr
attention First, we Currently have an exeessof open space as, required by the City's_OP
Ordinance, however, we' are likely to 4Se •that up' as we' adjust lot sizes fot our preliminary plat
submission. Second, we" liaye diet With, the city engineer and. he, ap'prove�l.the intent of'out
p ative-to the -"modified Waal- section" approach. Finally, it is; our intent'"to `seek - • Conee t rel
a iovalfo i
pp r, our cohcept subtnissroiz at the August 9 Plamting Conunissiott tneetulg:� :Therefore,; ,
i `i-f tl ere are any other. issues(that . feel tie still unresolved, please:let inc laiow as soon as ,.;, ;:y,..
possible
4.
5.'
Sind
ouNobAlmi
em?)..•..?,;..
en t &.Director of Design.:
Greg Nlor0
Mark Youiigdahl
109 E. Myrtle Street
Stillwater, .Minnesota' 55082
(551) 3.511-1450
cr
a senn & youngdahl community
Co/VCef[
1 troddetibh,-, ,.
2: ,, pioject Team
file
4 .:-.Gerierak Overview
a - - toriitiaoSilli ,itory ?rip
_ . ..
5,',. - Exiailiff:Vedetativd Cover
6 ,. Walke and Trails
„ . .
7: . Open Space
. .
d Stylo
1-:Iliiiiiiiectiral:Guicio!!!„7" an
1
6.:::k)±-;-;5,a..-c,i;ei‘r;;64cidi„:[4ne-177 Storm 11117,1: Design
TrIE:VVtevir,
ation repo ,
Fhihit
preliminary conceptual sif� ly�ut
tOpOecitreil
;•,
I •
.7;7 777 _7777;
' -
As'we _began to consider the. notion of reshaping the land at the Mons Property we were both honored
Challenged - honored to have earned the -trust of its owner and' challenged with the task to ieave behind_a
legacy to honor this family's stewardship of their land:
We eff know -that this land has -remained relatively untouched for quite sometime except for the hands that - _
have -harvested its =produce and consequently the -process of reshaping this'land deserves specialattention
As this concept japijedated 16 you itis_our ii6PO that our commitment to design excellence In creating
places of merit wilt be recognized `
As some of you are aware we have worked closely with city staff members along the way' -to make sure our'
objectives are consistent with. the qUidelinea established for the City et Lake _Elmo We are hopeful -that our
efforts will be, recognized and also that our: work will, be: remarkable. We are -very excited about this;_
opportunity to be involved in an open space community herein Lake Elmo and we applaud the; City:.for its
commitment.to preserve its scenic rural lth andscape rough its adoption of its'open space,
development guidelines
St Croix Farms, LLC._
651 351 1450 Mark Yourigdahl
Senn & Youngdahl
651.351 1450 .Darren Senn:
Larson Brenner Architects
651.430 0056 Ron Brenner
651.351 1450 -.Darren -Senn
proJeet engineer: ProTerra Design Associates
651.739 8131 . Greg Mons
surveyor Cornerstone Land Surveying
651:275 8969 = Dan Thur nes
wastewater treatment
Wenck Associates, Inc
76$ 479 4246= Glenn Sanders
S ,$tel7t
oungdahk
•
The City of take Elrno has a veryspecial meaning to _the design and build firm of Senn &Youngdahl; for it is here where
• our Journey began;: Born of a dream to reintroduce character filled architecture into the marketplace, Senn & Youngdahl's
commitment to design•excellence has been unwavering It has also been well,recognizedi
The Farmhouse" at The Fields of St Croix set the trend in the Twin Cities market and served to introduce the most
'significant movement m contemporaryresidential architecture -the traditional,. neighborhood development (fND): Literally
thousands of people visited-bather-6 and were inspired by thiscreative new direction for our market,"
Thanke;to the City of take Elmo for their commitment to sensible land use as well as the talents of the RobertEngstrom .
• Companies; The -Field's of St. Croix became recognized throughout the country for its excellence in innovation and design
and consequently was the recipient nurrierous awards It has been very gratifying tote involved'in such a remarkable
Our work at.the Fields -of St Croix'has been`sean in
various publications. fn fact the_first three houses built,
there bySenn & Youngdahl were featured on the cover
of Land Development magazine `,. Furthermore, the -
"Farmhouse" at The-fields.was showcased World wide_-,'
when Andersen Windows chose it td.be featured;in its -
variouspublications `
Since then Senn e Youngdahl has. been the recipient of numerous local, and•PatiOnet awards including the Reggie
Award, The Trillium,Award and the Bestir.' American Living;Award (GALA) which is cosponsored by the National -
-:Association of Home Builders and Professional Builder' lafack one of our homes was runner-up for the,BALA home
of-theyear-' award' In additionour homes have been seen_ in numerous publications includingBetter Homes arid
Gardens,' Professional Builderi and Target We have also been closely involved with some.of the Twm Cites most
_ -'innovative and well designed developments Liberty on the Lake in Stillwater and Cobblestone Lake m Apple Valley;,
Though these two neighborhoods are_substantially different than whatthe Mons property wm ill become each represents
. :The quality of design-thatt Senn & Youngdahl iscommdted to.
So what does all this mean It means that Senn & Youngdahl s commitment to design excellence is enduring and that
- -we intend to further broaden that commitment as we are involved in the many facets of the Mors Property, -
•The engineering firm of ProTerra Design Associates is a multiple disciplinary firm thathas a very, interesting connection
the,Mons Property Greg Mons practicing engineer as his namesake suggests -is the-grendson," of the owner of the Morie'
Property _In fact it was this land that served as the catalyst, for Greg s interest in the field 'Of civil engineering:',
It is a privilege to work with an engineerwith such strong ties to the land We believe that these -ties will enhance our
11
efforts to create.a Iegacyfor the Moris Family
Berl overvi
This brief general overview wilt give a quick glimpse -into our concept Further discussion Of
each of these topics will be discussedas suggested in the.table of -contents:
sti
The beauty of the Mork Farm refinishes your soul. Its transforming power comes
from nature's creation inspired by the hand of its Oesiguer, Let's face it, this land,
pure, simple, and uninterrupted has been around for quite a while and we respect
that, That's why we're committed to he good stewards of this valuable: resource
while we leave a Legacy in honor of its past, present and future owners.
Wise\ we fp t'st say., the lVto115 Farm we wondered how we can i et ain its natural keenly while we
reshape nature's work? Our fits€ reactleil was to figuEe nut how to build invisible houses and
then —build them! Unfortunately, we hnd tci r eccsiesides eur strategy. Our revised gars epian
gave Firth to several objectives which when combined witl enhance oer oeera€l ,vision to shape
the land and nunimPie our "footprints".
The rural landscape that Lake Elmo offers.is breathtaking In m order to aintain a green.,
corridor, we 'have -kept the development away from 45'h Street This preserves the
beauty of Lake Elmo as one travels amidst its scenic countryside:_
We have purposely -designed our plan to reduce the impact of our homes` rear
elevations not,only,atthe entry and the public corridorbut also within ournew.
neighborhood
By winding our street over the hill and through the woods our plan will allow, the-
cyc motorist list, and pedestrian to experience the natural beautydhet the Mons,
property offers
Our landscape concept will seek to combine natural elements with designed.
landscape inorder to create a satisfying contrast In addition, we will seek -an
option'to make or continue rtibjse the -land productive- Simply stated Its our
intenttto make the;open space more than simply mowed grass
By providing connections to a comprehensive trail system the_Ibxury of biking or
walking trito the quaint town of Lake Elmo becomes`a real possili lity In add_ lion,
connecting, neighborhood trail systems fo'sters community interaction
(-
UT?
Lrq
ET:
Urr2r.'Htr"La" Cs r. reinj;.; mijerl Lbf-
The home. The word itself conjures deep emotion in all of us. We have taken this to heart as we
have worked to create a style that Is as timeless as it is recognizeable. The blessing of the land
is the home and the blessing of the home is the land. We hope that as we tenderly blend our
homes with this land, we will create something very special.
ezatting rege;
The existing landscape of the property is characterized by open rolling prairie a significant wooded area -on"
the -southwest portion of th_e siteL and farmland separafed by a dramatic east - west wooded ridge that runs:_
from the central west side of the site _to the -center of the development The entire boundary of the site
lined with mature trees of various species Scattered throughout the site are insignificant stands of be*, -
elder and green ash and stoat remnant wetlands that areipredominately-coveretl With reed canary grass:
The southern boundary of the property is adjacent to Suntish'Park which is also -heavily wooded
The majority of the site is;covered byopen fiettlspeeies, including common mullein; aster thistle native,
and cultivated -grasses .The southwestern portion of the site and south edge of the.property are mature
hardwoods -such as buroak whitepak and red.oak
Housing pads will be carefully sited to. avoid steep slopes significant trees and other natural amenities
deemed.to'be significant:,,
One of the most valuable features of tht is projecwill be the extensive use of trails Among the' objectives;
thet have been established for our trail system are the following
1 create connectivity to surrounding nei4.ghborhoods and other areas'of naturall terest
2 enhance, the ability to experience the natural beautysthat surrounds the property
3' provide safety for pedestrians and other no. n motonzedvehicles
4 enhancethe hvabihty of the community and also foster soaal interaction
Trail widths will be kept to a minimu_'m of six feet and will be constructed of bituminous material for longevity
and usability-= '
In add tiomto'the open space within the community The Mons property also lies adjacent to and wither! ---,
walking distance of the Sunfish Lake Park It is.our ntenhon to provide pedestrian access to this incredibly^;
saentc park.; This connection is locetetl at the southwest guadrantof the property.
On our proposed concept plan there are essentially two major areas of open space. First we have the `'
northern parcel of open sp`ace which can be further divided-mto two parts separated; by Julep Avenue On_
the"west side_ofJulepit is the mtentiortto continue, in its existing use as d'etermned,by its current owner
Currently this is an active agncultural'parcel and it would continue as such
Or'the east side of Julep is another large open space area that we propose to be an active parcel as well-
The',activi would be consistent with the City of Lake Elmo s_development guidelines:. The placement of this"
open spa a area is consistent with one=of ocir primaryobjectives and that to reduce the impact',of
development adjacent to the public corridor Various uses have been considered for this area Of-fopen space
some of which are agricultural 'tree farms / orchard; horse grazing area etc Further discussionsand
strategy will continue with -the development of our'plan It Ys of primary concern to us that whatever its
intended usest _that d is ma'intamed properly through the established enforcement mechanisms of the "=
Minnesota Land -Trust and The Homeowners asssociatwn
Examples of radtiimzusg at open space north `
.Theo her major area of open space°is located at the southern''/ of the property _Our intention is to
maintain that`as rt currently exists=an open-meadowOther considerations have been native.
p_raide or native grassland prang
Visual reference for open space -south
Other photographicrepresentationfor open space sou
It is our intention that thecommuhity shared open space will be permanently protected through
conservation easement with the mnesota Land Trust ,Also additiona_I conservation easements'.
will be located on individual properties in order to mamtam'the pOpfrOt of the natural character ;
'-
,of the community along select public eorndors This conservation easement wdl beheld
by the City pf Lake Etmo as noted as Buffer Corpdo open;space on heet CI 2-included m this
(.,Package
nes
LandscapeCoite
In er open spacecommunity .sso much of -its visual appeal depends uponthe''execution and
maintenance of the open space areas Our objective --is to createe community landscape plan for''
the open space that retains its beauty ih, its naturalandfor cultivated state Controlled by the
homeowners association, the maintenance and care of these spaces is essential however with
derefetaeleafteejef Meet material and well exeeuted design we hope that these open space areas
will 'patina naturally over time As we seek to fully<develop our community landscape design
- these foundational principles with help guide our way
The community landscape design co_ noept will seekto contrastthe natural -beauty of our
space areas with:well designed and manicured areasthet will bemore - formal Sharp edges of -
contrast will'ereafe'wsual iriterest and textural elements to the ,landscape: See photo_s_below
The entry into'the; property will provide a sense of arrival but will also seek -lobe slight!}
understated It is=our hope that the land. will speak,for itself upon arrival
ndtVdual Lot landscape Concej
There are two distinct types oflots within -the project each requiring its own set of rules that will be
enforced by the Architectural Review Committee and in somecases a conservation easement
First home sites that are centered around. the open "space areas_ Will be encourage to set the home .`
further from the street -and maintain a landscape buffer that rs-consrstento i both sides.of the street.";.
The driveway -should be designed so that it disappears as d meanders toward the -home
Continuous natural areas flowing through the open;space will else straddle_ property lines in these
areas will.enhance the -flowing characteristicsof this area Also to help reduce the, impact of
the home from the street these home sites will be pushed a good distance away from-fhe street
Second home sites thatrar located in`areas that face each other These'streetscepes "will feel
different becauseihe homes will be pulled a bit closer to the street creating a more "neighborly
look -and feel _ It is possible that the landscape m-these areas willbe manicured up to the street
arch!tectiiir ga�sdeline
Architectural Guidelines.17
Perhaps the most important aspect with.this projectis the necessity to create and maintain
high_standards inhome-design that will enhance th-e land plan and be sensitive to it ,,Inorder
to maintain the high standard of design that has been paramount to Senn &, Youngdahl_(this
projects primary _builder) an• Architectural Control Committee,will be established and,will
enforce the design stOnqatds and covenants as developed -by the projectdesign team Senn _'
& Youngdahl will have the -freedom to select builders from theicpreferred builder, pool to be•a
part of this unique opportunity
Anybuilder who has been approved to participate_m this •project will be contractuallyrrequired'-
•
to submit their' plans for approval to the;ACC I__n additwn landsoppe plans-intim be required
and also will be submitted to the -ACC for their approval 'Items' to be review by the ACC wdl
include but not Limited to the following;; Fences;, out butldmgs and accessory
structures, dogkennels, _pools 'hot tubs as well as all exteriel- building surfaces ` A complete
listof acceptable building materials will' be developed
Each'and every home bwlt at this projectwill be subject to the ACC which shall maintain -
control throughout the completiomof the project '.,;.`
At -Senn & Youngdahl we have created a unique style of home that is clearly recognizable We'
have -worked tremendously hard.to-tinderstancttha.tletailS1hat are necessary to create homes of
lasting value and thus we are confidentahat the follovwing homestyles will work extremely well with'
the land The following hst of appropriate styles is not all -encompassing ,however it;will-present
our concept well , These pictorial examples are all' home that have been built -by Senn
1=1- YOurigdahli Imbedded within these•pictures are houses -that are an eclectic'mix of style:which will
also be artacceptable ven encouraged style within project. -
Queen Annefprmfiouse°
' r
rr= Vrrrrir; Ertf-,eLcr rr
"ves fher99,-
- _ • HT:- - i.athe,
,
and
lbAR et? designed
to
rnee
e
snow storage
ditches iistead of curb to
WATER
ker' 7a r15;;::
-rr - • Th.-
!:H; 4'1;0° 957'
--ythe!roeds within 4i:cry traveling iiiavvjPr roaciswithin the itject:r"
t
11-:4:CP theibeauty of
:„ •• -d h ii&iiexery
- - 9!!, shallow r
; ;• '
, • • , ,•-• • ; turn---;,;:. ±heprc), transport .5
and Ocittei.,,
GRADING
thexis
- existing woodlands
hance]the rural
cizect* Lc?
ystem and preserving the existing Iandscape This will be accomplishec
he need fot Iarge
- wter Ireatmnt pond The design will take into consideration normal hydrolpgic c
•
r -2!
- parameters kIVW11!.;.?ntroi the runoff from the 100-year storm eventto the downsti
•I'r 14'
;,.:, ;-: ,li
[
:
I - J. ':; :::.' j,::11 ':- ' : : r-o.:.' ::.','F.J'f',._ '. • r' ': '''!"j',1';- '. : = :..4.- 1 •Fri 7 : -: xiE.'''v;f:`:..'
., ?: - :
'',,,I.:tf ,,,If.-"&':.:
•
, 1 ,
r = AND STORM
The interit of the site grading and storm
slrm
-27?.66 eam
- 1 1
July 6, 2004
Mr. Chuck Dillerud
City of Lake Elmo
3 800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Re: Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove, OP Development/Concept Plan Submittal
Dear Mr, Dillerud:
Thank you for submitting the concept plan for the Tapestry at Charlotte's Grove. On behalf of the
Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD), I have reviewed the information and this letter provides
my preliminary comments. Because the project will require a VBWD permit, I will review the
project more thoroughly once a VBWD permit application is submitted.
Background
The project site lies within the several subwatersheds and drains to various landlocked basins.
• The west side of the site drains to Berchens Pond, a landlocked, Department of Natural
Resources (DNR)-protected wetland within the Lake Jane subwatershed.
• The northern third of the site drains north to Clear Lake, a semi -landlocked lake.
• The southwestern portion of the site drains to City Park Pond, a landlocked, DNR-protected
wetland within Sunfish Lake Park.
• The southeastern quarter of the site drains to Sunfish Lake, a landlocked lake.
• A small portion of the eastern side of the site drains to Goetschel Pond, a landlocked, DNR-
protected wetland. subwatershed.
Floodplain Issues
No topographic mapping (other than the USGS map in the Wetland Delineation Report) has been
submitted with the concept plan. While the site appears to lie on high ground, several small wetlands are
on the site. The developer will need to calculate the 100-year flood levels of all of the basins on the site,
and possibly adjacent to the site, if the adjacent basins could impact the site. Since several of the basins
appear to be normally landlocked, the developer is encouraged to make detailed analyses and accurately
determine the 100-year flood levels. However, in the absence of a detailed analysis, the VBWD will base
its requirements upon flood levels determined using the VBWD's approximate method, discussed in
Section V, Subd. 3, Item A4 of the VBWD rules and regulations.
The 100-year flood levels are used to protect homes from flooding. Adjacent to all waters of the VBWD,
the Managers set the minimum building elevation at two feet above the 100-year flood elevation. The
minimum building elevation for each lot will need to be noted on the grading plan.
The VBWD regulates the amount of fill that can be placed within a basin's 100-year flood boundary.
The fill volume is limited so that the cumulative effect of all possible filling will not raise the 100-year
flood level more than 0.1 foot. If filling is proposed, the developer will need to show that the project
complies with this rule.
DAVID BUCHECK LINCOLN FETCHER DONALD SCHEEL DALE BORASH DUANE JOHNSON
www.vbwd.org
Mr. Chuck Dillerud
July 6, 2004
Page 2
Water Quality
No stormwater runoff treatment is shown on the plans. The project will need to incorporate
stormwater runoff water quality treatment measures into the design.
Water Quantity
Because the site drains to landlocked or semi -landlocked basins, it is important that features that will
minimize the increase in stormwater runoff volumes be incorporated into the site design. Practices
that will reduce the amount of impervious surfaces and encourage infiltration must be considered,
including the following:
X Constructing the site so that compaction in pervious areas is prevented,
X Requiring that soils be loosened to a depth of 24-inches to a maximum compaction of 85%
standard proctor density and tilling the upper 10 inches of soils prior to planting,
X Directing roof drains to pervious areas,
X Using pervious areas for snow storage,
X Planting trees that at maturity will canopy over the impervious surfaces,
X Planting deep-rooted trees, shrubs, wildflowers, and grasses in at least 25% of the project's green
space,
X Constructing the low -volume residential roads to a maximum width of 22 feet when parking is
allowed on one side and 28 feet when parking is allowed on both sides,
X Designing the site to minimize the lengths of roadways and driveways. Consider eliminating the
road between Lot 50 and Lot 56. Consider requiring that homes be built closer to the proposed
roads, rather than the maximum set back. (The conceptual layouts of Lots 16, 17, 42, and 43 all
show the homes to be built at the maximum set back, which creates the longest possible
driveways.)
X Requiring that long driveways be narrowed to a single lane (around 11 feet wide) as they
approach the street,
X Keeping the proposed trails as narrow as practical, and consider using porous pavement. Because
a long length of trails is proposed, reducing the width by just a small amount could reduce the
amount of impervious surface by a fair amount.
X Constructing rainwater gardens and/or infiltration basins.
Wetland Issues
The concept plans shows potential impacts to wetlands. The VBWD is the Local Government Unit
responsible for administrating the Wetland Conservation Act (WCA). The intent of the WCA is to avoid
wetland impacts. The developer will need to follow all of the rules and regulations of the WCA, and
submit all of the necessary documentation. The VBWD will then review the information, forward the
information to the appropriate agencies for comments, and ensure the proposal conforms to the WCA and
other VBWD wetland rules and regulations.
Any projects with wetland impacts take a minimum of six weeks from the time a complete permit
application is submitted until a permit can be obtained. All developers proposing wetland impacts are
strongly encouraged to meet with a Barr Engineering Company wetland scientist and me before a VBWD
permit is submitted. We have visited the site and verified the existing wetland boundaries, but we have
not seen any grading plans for the site.
Mr. Chuck Dillerud
July 6, 2004
Page 3
Permit Requirements
The proposed project will require a permit from the VBWD. The developer must submit a complete
permit application packet to me. Permit application materials can be obtained from the VBWD's website,
www.vbwd.ora. or from me. Once a complete VBWD permit application is submitted, I will review the
project for conformance to the VBWD's rules and regulations, including:
• Stormwater rates
• Water quality treatment
• Flood levels and minimum floor elevations
• Wetland protection
• Erosion controls
• Potential downstream impacts
Open Space
While the VBWD does not have specific rules regarding open space, I encourage the developer to
work with the City of Lake Elmo to better connect the open spaces proposed on the site. This site
can be part of a larger natural greenway from the Tri-Lakes, to Sunfish Lake Parlc, Lake Elmo
Regional Park, Tartan Parlc, and eventually the St. Croix River. A large natural resource patch is
better than a small one, and patches that are connected to one another are more valuable than isolated
units. When resources are either contiguous or functionally connected by water bodies or vegetation,
both plant and animal species are better able to move, which can increase opportunities for
reproduction and survival in general. Larger, contiguous areas are also more likely to influence
groundwater and surface water by intercepting more rainfall and facilitating more infiltration.
Connectivity can be accomplished by ensuring that undeveloped areas remain contiguous and by
improving the quality of dedicated open space. The proposed Lot 15 and Lot 21 appear to cause
some fragmentation of the larger natural resource patch.
If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-832-2622.
Sincerely,
John P. Hanson, P.E.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY
Engineers for the Valley Branch Watershed District
c: David Bucheck, VBWD President
Mark Youngdahl, Developer
LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION
STAFF REPORT
Date: July 8, 2004 for the Meeting of July 12, 2004
Applicant: St. Croix Farms, LLC
Location: South of 456) Street North/West of Keats Avenue
Requested Action: OP Concept Plan
Land Use Plan Guiding: RAD
Existing Zoning: RR
Site History and Existing Conditions:
City records regarding this 173 acre site are complex (a and convoluted) , but sketchy as to details.
From a 1976 City consultant's staff report to the Lake Elmo Planning Commission and City
Council, it appears that the owners of the majority of the site (Moris Family) platted the "Moris
Addition" about that time (1976). From that document we learn that Moris had previously created
one of the two parcels along (but west of) the west border of the site. In 1976 Moris added to one
of those parces, and created the second parcel west of this site, and the "Exception" parcel along
the west border (and surrounded by) this site. Those division and platting actions in the 1970's
created unusual access accommodations to those new parcels from 45th Street by way of
easements and outlots. The technical details of those arrangements — as they impact this Concept
Plan — have been reviewed by the City Attorney. It appears that access to the subject site can be
accomplished by a Public Roadway, as proposed.
Discussion and Analysis:
The applicant proposes an OP Concept of 67 home sites on a site of 172 gross acres (167
Buildable Acres). Responsive to the OP Preserved Open Space requirements the applicant also
proposes 92.08 acres of Preserved Open Space . While we have not located evidence as to whether
any unbuildable site are is included in the 92 acres, the proposed Preserved Open Space area is
8.5 acres over the minimum requirement, and the sum of unbuildable area on the site is but 5.3
acres. It will make no difference if unbuildable area is within the total Preserved Open Space
calculation.
Our review of the Concept for compliance with OP Standards reveals the following:
1. The applicant proposes a 200 foot OP buffer to the north; and, 100 foot OP buffers to the
east and south. Since most of the east boundary of the site abuts the Hamlet on Sunfish
Lake OP site, a 100 foot buffer with adequate year-round landscape screening is compliant
with OP standards. The north 350 feet of the east boundary of the site does not abut the
Hamlet, and should provide the full 200 foot buffer. The applicant is aware of this
inconsistency , and has indicated that a modification will be made to accommodate the full
200 foot buffer.
2. The applicant proposes a 100 foot OP buffer to the south. Here the situation approximates
that of Whistling Valley and the Regional Park neighboring parcel, where only a 100 foot
buffer was required since no homes will be constructed on the Park property. With the
entire south line of this site abutting Sunfish Park, the same 100 foot buffering requirement
appears in order.
3. The proposed lot areas for the 11 lots in the encircled block of the southeast portion of the
site all fall below the .75 acre minimum for an OP project on a community wastewater
system. The applicant is aware of that, and has advised staff that they will seek a 4/5 OP
variance for those lot sizes at that location.
4. The plan text proposes use of a "modified rural cross section" street design. Staff has
advised the applicants that "rural cross section streets" are now prohibited by the OP
Ordinance based on the City's experience with that design in the Parkview Ridge OP. That
experience has been a string of homeowner grading permits to fill the "ditch" with a
culvert and filled grade to the street — destroying the rural character aspects of the cross
section and the natural street drainage intent. We have advised the applicant that it could
apply for a 4/5 OP Variance to incorporate their "modified rural section", but they would
have to convince staff and the City Engineer that the intent will not be compromised by
individual property owners that want to have flat, manicured yards to the street.
We have been advised that the applicant has met with adjacent property owners on two occasions
to review the Concept Plan and solicit comments/suggestions. We have attached the written
comments of a couple of those adjacent property owners. We expect the Public Hearing will result
in additional commentary/observations/suggestions.
In a parallel process that is not related to this OP design or density the City is considering a
potential arrangement with the developer that will involve sale of the City -owned 15+ acre north
of 451h Street. Should that transaction not take place, we would expect the "Berschens
Conservation Easement" portion of the OP to be deleted, along with 6 of the 67 lots proposed.
Comments we have received on the Concept from DNR reference the 1,000 foot Shoreland
Overlay impact on a portion this site by way of proximity to Sunfish Lake. We observe, however,
that a clause in the Lake Elmo Shoreland Standards appears to exempt Shoreland applicability
where there is topographic division between the lake and the site — which we believe exists with
this site.
No written City Engineer's comments are available as of "press time for this Report. We have
heard verbally from the City Engineer, however, that he has concern with the "modified rural
section streets", but he is willing to consider the applicant's details before rendering a final
recommendation. He has also expressed concern with the geometries of the intersection of the
easement roadway to the south with the Concept's entrance road.
Findings and Recommendations:
Were we to suggest Findings at this point we would have to suggest the Concept Plan, as
presented, fails to comply with the OP Standards — even assuming the 4/5 OP Variance proposals.
We have advised the applicant of this, and of the comments/observations we have received from
adjacent property owner to date We have suggested that this Concept is sufficiently unique
(positively unique in most respects) in design and sizable in scale that it may be prudent to
conduct the Public Hearing and hear the comments of the Commission prior to making
modifications to the Plan per the above Staff observations and those adjacent property owner
comments/observations we have received to date.
Planning Commission Actions Requested:
We have not prepared a recommended action in that we anticipate the applicant will request a
tabling for two weeks to address the Staff, Hearing and Commission testimony, and address the
Plan modifications that may result.
A O 0 Am."-
Charles E. Doi Teerud, City Planner
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. DNR Comments
3. Letters Received
4. Applicant's Documentation
Lake Elmo
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT No. 11. A
Agenda Item: Hwy 5
Background Information for August 17. 2004:
The Administrator, City Planner and City Engineer met with engineering representatives of Washington
County Engineering and the Minnesota Department of Transportation. The following items were discussed:
• Long term planning, construction implementation and ownership of Hwy 5,
• Safety issues to be addressed with short term planned maintenance activities; subject to funding,
• And the development of alternate traffic routing and shared funding plans in the future.
MN DOT discussed the Mill/Overlay project scheduled for September 04 and no possibility (funding) for
changes at this time. They also identified other maintenance and safety related upgrades scheduled for the
future; pending funding.
The group will meet in two weeks to review a planning partnership concept that could act as the catalyst in
the development of a shelf plan to establish a position for funding.
Person responsible:
Action Items:
Report to Council only Martin Rafferty
Attachments:
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: Mutual Aid for Fire for St. Croix Valley and Hudson Fire Service
Baekeround Information for August 17, 2004:
No. 11. B
Attached you will find an agreement for the Lake Elmo Fire Department, to provide Mutual Aid to the St
Croix Valley and Hudson Fire Departments, These agreements are Ivey to the area wide response to
emergency situations.
The agreement has been reviewed by the City Attorney, the Fire Chief and myself. I recommend we move
forward and sign the agreement.
Action Items:
Motion for Mayor, City Administrator and Fire Chief to sign
Mutual Aid Agreement with St. Croix Valley and Hudson Fire
Service.
Attachments:
Mutual Aid Agreement: St Croix and Hudson Fire Service
Person resnonsible:
Martin Rafferty
ST. CROIX VALLEY
FIRE SERVICE AGREEMENT
INCLUSIVE OF: LAKE ELMO MINNESOTA
AND
CITY OF HUDSON WISCONSIN
THIS AGREEMENT is made pursuant to Minnesota Statutes and Wisconsin Statutes which
authorize the joint and cooperative exercise of powers common to contracting parties in other states.
The intent of this Agreement is to make fire service equipment, personnel and other related resources
available to political subdivisions from other political subdivisions.
1. Definitions.
a. "Party" means a political subdivision.
b. "Requesting Official" means the person designated by a Party who is responsible for
requesting Assistance from other Parties.
c. "Requesting Party" means a party that requests assistance from other parties.
d. "Responding Official" means the person designated by a party who is responsible to
determine whether and to what extent that party should provide assistance to a
Requesting Party.
e. "Responding Party" means a party that provides assistance to a Requesting Party.
f. "Assistance" means fire and/or emergency medical services personnel and equipment.
2. Request for Assistance.
Whenever, in the opinion of a Requesting Official, there is a need for assistance from other
parties, the Requesting Official may call upon the Responding Official of any other party to furnish
assistance.
3. Response to Request.
Upon the request for assistance from a Requesting Party, the Responding Official may
authorize and direct a party's personnel to provide assistance to the Requesting Party. This decision
will be made after considering the needs of the responding party and the availability of resources.
4. Recall of Assistance.
The Responding Official may at any time recall the assistance when in their best judgment or
by an order from the governing body of the Responding Party, it is considered to be in the best
interests of the Responding Party to do so.
5. Command of Scene.
The,Requesting 1Paity wilt' be iti cornrllaht of Alit mutual aid,.scene.. The personnel and
.' quipment of the Responding Party will be under the direction and control of the Requesting Party
intil the Responding Official withdraws assistance.
6. Workers' Compensation.
Each party is responsible for injuries or death of its own personnel. Each party will maintain
workers' compensation insurance or self-insurance coverage, covering its own personnel while they
are providing assistance pursuant to this agreement. Each party waives the right to sue any other party
for any workers' compensation benefits paid to its own employee or volunteer or their dependants,
even if the injuries were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other party or its officers,
employees, or volunteers.
7. Damage to Equipment.
Each party is responsible for damages to or loss of its own equipment. Each party waives the
right to sue any other party for any damages to or loss of its equipment, even if the damages or losses
were caused wholly or partially by the negligence of any other party or its officers, employees, or
volunteers.
S. Liability.
Rinisognel,acting under this Agreement may,.,»ot,be considered, fgtjiabil,ity,pnoses, as an
employee or agent of the other state or a political subdivision of the other state for their actions,
regardlessof the supervision or control of the person's actions while within the other. state. All
personnel will be considered as continuing to be employees of the employing agency in the person's
home state.
Except as provided below, any person acting under this Agreement must continue to be covered
by their employing agency for purposes of civil liability purposes in their home state Any personnel
acting within the other state under this Agreement is considered while so acting to be in the ordinary
course of their employment within their home state and to be protected by any statutory immunity from
liability and limits of liability enjoyed in their home state..
In addition to home state immunity from liability or immunity from limits of liability, any
personnel acting under this Agreement in the other state are also entitled to any immunity from liability
or limit on liability to the same extent as a person of the other state. If'hbwevertatelaimmismmadoinn.
1 anesotaa,for..anlee'°E1mot ewliepartent .
agrees1 to defend°°ant •indenmif)+"tl e"Wi'sconsirrpatty fin `el'attrw ttiittmekeee' t the WMcbnshrparties'
statutorylimits'-of liability; subjet"t°ttrthe9imitatiorison-rnunici•paMort°liability enjoyed,hy aloe Elmo
1 ir' eparttnentm; and to•the°extetrrtsttalte Einio°s iiabilityiresttiranC coverage.
9. Charges to the Requesting Party.
a. No charges will be levied by a Responding Party to this agreement for assistance
rendered to a Requesting Party under the terms of this agreement unless that assistance
continues for a period of more than 12 hours. If assistance provided under this
agreement continues for more than 12 hours, the Responding Party will submit to the
Requesting Party an itemized bill for the actual cost of any assistance provided after the
initial 12 hour period, including salaries, overtime, materials and supplies and other
necessary expenses; and the Requesting Party will reimburse the party providing the
assistance for that amount.
b. Any charges are not contingent upon the availability of federal or state government
funds.
10. Duration.
This Agreement will be in force for a period of three (3) years from the date of execution. Any
party may withdraw from this Agreement upon thirty (30) days written notice to the other party or
parties to the Agreement.
11. Execution.
Each party hereto has read, agreed to and executed this Mutual Aid Agreement on the date
indicated. Each party to this Agreement shall maintain an executed copy of this Agreement.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, on behalf of their political subdivision or their fire
department corporation has executed this agreement on this date.
Dated: . 2003
CITY OF LAKE ELMO LAKE ELMO FIRE DEPARTMENT
, its Mayor . its Fire Chief'
. its City Clerk . its Secretary
CITY OF HUDSON HUDSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
. its Mayor . its Fire Chief
_ its Manager or Clerk . its Secretary
HUDSON FIRE DEPARTMENT
222 WALNUT STREET
HUDSON, WISCONSIN 54016
715-386-5861
December 9, 2003
Lake Elmo Fire Department
Attn: Greg Malmquist
3510 Laverne Ave. N.
Lake Elmo, MN 55042-4860
JIM FRYE
JEFF DABRUZZI
DAN ROEGLIN
BILL WANNER
DAN SMITH
DAVE KRUPICH
PAUL JENSEN
TOM ZEULI
-FIRE CHIEF
-1st ASSISTANT CHIEF
-2nd ASSISTANT CHIEF
-CAPTAIN
-CAPTAIN
-FIRE INSPECTOR
-TREASURER
-SECRETARY
Dear Greg Malmquist,
The Hudson Fire Department was unable to participate in the Capitol City Mutual Aid agreement and
wishes to keep a mutual aid relationship with your department. Enclosed you will find a mutual aid
agreement we have with other Minnesota agencies. Please review the agreement and contact us with
any comments that you have. Our city attorney is Catherine Munkittrick she can re beached at 715-
425-7281, if you or your city attorney would have any questions about the agreement.
Sincerely,
Jim Frye
Chief
Hudson Fire Department
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: Disposal of Fire Equipment to a Minnesota Fire Department
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
No. 11. C
The Lake Elmo Fire Chief has been in contact with a small Fire Department in northern Minnesota
pertaining to their existing Air Pack protection equipment. In that discussion it was discovered their
(northern city) equipment was several generations (older) behind the existing LE Fire Department
equipment that has now become surplus to Lake Elmo Fire, as we have received federal dollars to replace
all of our Air Pack equipment. Our new equipment is now in place.
It is proposed that the City of Lake Elmo Fire Department donate our surplus Air Pack equipment to a
smaller Minnesota City for their Fire Department use.
The City of Lake Elmo would transfer the equipment to the receiving City upon receipt of an approved City
Council Resolution accepting the equipment transfer and acknowledging Lake Elmo does not warranty the
condition and is removed from liability for its future use.
Action Items:
Motion for Mayor, City Administrator and Fire Chief to sign
an agreement to transfer outdated surplus Air Pack equipment to
receiving city.
Attachments:
Person responsible:
Martin Rafferty
Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Item: Modification to Dog Ordinance
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
No. 11. D
The Community Improvement Committee (CIC) has studied the current Ordinance regulating restraint of
dogs.
Upon study and review the CIC has recommended that a minor change to the dog ordinance be adopted.
The change proposed requires that a dog owner employ an active restraint system if the dog is left outside
and the owner(s) are not at home. The FLIP Council Committee has recommended the change be made to
the current ordinance.
Action Items:
Resolution adopting a modification to the Dog Ordinance
requiring an active restraint of a dog; if the animal is left out side
when the owner is not at home.
Attachments:
Ordinance modification at Council
Person responsible:
Martin Rafferty
Aug 13 04 01:34p Kathi Pelnar
715-386-8825 p.l
End of Year Report 2003 Animal Control
City of Lake Elmo
2003 2004
Total Number of calls Received 145 81
Total Calls Requiring response 124 72
Total Calls handled over the phone or
With only a warning letter 21 09
Total Viscous Dog Calls - 01 02
Total Number of dogs picked up 46 20
Total Number of Cats picked up 57 39
Total Number of Pick ups with collar and
Identification tags on (dogs only) 09 07
Total Number of picks ups with collars only
(Dogs only) 16 07
Total Number of dogs picked up wearing
Invisible fence collars 04 04
Submitted by:
Kathi Pelnar CVT, CHI
Animal Warden
a
Lake Elmo
City Council
August 17, 2004
Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT No. 11. E.
Agenda Item: Purchase Property at 3585 Laverne Avenue
Background Information for August 17, 2004:
The property in question is contiguous to the Lions ball field. It is the only residential property remaining
on that specific block. It is also contiguous to an optional location for the new city hall, PW and optional
fire station.
The owner was preparing to sell his house and became aware, via TV, of the optional location for city
facilities. He approached me to discuss the possibility. I informed the owner of the city plans to locate city
facilities and our potential interest in the location.
He is a willing seller, as he is relocating at this time, and desires an arrangement with the city if the city has
an interest.
I recommend the purchase of the property to serve the public interest and need.
Person responsible:
Martin Rafferty
Action Items:
Resolution authorizing the Mayor and City Administrator to
complete a purchase agreement and purchase of the property
located at 3585 Laverne Avenue
Attachments:
LMC
(aogua of Minnasola Cities
Cilies promoting wallows
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
League of Minnesota Cities
145 University Avenue West, St Paul, MN 55103-2044
(651) 281-1200 • (SOO) 925-1122
Fax: (651) 281-1299 • TDD: (651) 281-1290
www.lmno.org
City Clerks, Administrators and Managers
Jim Miller, Executive Director
August 9, 2004
Board of Directors Vacancies
RECEIVED
Nib 1 0 Nth
At the Annual Meeting in Duluth on October 11 th, the membership will elect four new members
to the Board of Directors. These officials will replace: Minnetonka Councilmember Terry
Schneider whose three-year term will expire; the two-year term of Alexandria Mayor Dan Ness,
who was elected to fill the unexpired term of Reggie Edwards who left city employment; and the
one-year term of Duluth Chief Administrative Officer Mark Winson, who was elected to fill the
unexpired term of Bonnie Rietz when she was elected to 2nd Vice President. In accordance with
the Board adopted Selection Criteria, Winson is eligible to apply for his own three-year term. St.
Paul Councilmember Chris Coleman's three-year term also expires, however, Coleman did not
run for re-election this past November, therefore his eligibility to serve on the LMC Board
terminated January 1, 2004. Pursuant to the LMC Constitution, the LMC Board appointed St.
Paul Councilmember Dan Bostrom at the recommendation of the City of St. Paul to fill
Coleman's term until the Annual Meeting in October at which time he must go before the
Nominating Committee and be elected by the membership to his own three-year term.
The League's strength has always been rooted in the Board's outstanding leadership. Continuing
that tradition is critical as the League Looks to meeting the ever -changing challenges facing our
cities. If you or someone on your Council has an interest in serving on the Board, please apply
now. Terms are for three years and service involves attendance at monthly Board meetings and
one or two, two-day, retreats. The League pays for most expenses, including mileage.
A roster of current Board members, an application form and the Board Nominating Process and
Selection Criteria are enclosed. I would be most happy to answer any questions and can be
reached at 651-281-1205.
Thank you for your help in this very important matter.
AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY/AFFIRMATIVE ACTION EMPLOYER
PRESIDENT
Mark Voxland, Mayor
City of Moorhead
4535 4 St S
Moorhead, MN 56560
VoxM@aotcom
FIRST VICE PRESIDENT
Judy Johnson, Mayor
City of Plymouth
4600 Jewel Lane
Plymouth MN 55446
jjohnson@ci.plymouth.mn.us
SECOND VICE PRESIDENT
Bonnie Rietz, Mayor
City of Austin
500 NE 4th Avenue
Austin, MN 55912
brietztThei. austin. mn.us
DIRECTORS
Dan Bostrom, Councilmember
City of St. Paul
Room 310 B, City Hall
15 West Kellogg Blvd.
St. Paul, MN 55102
dan.bo strom@ci. stnaul. mn.us
Mary Hamann -Roland, Mayor
City of Apple Valley
7100 West 147th Street
Apple Valley, MN 55124
info(cdci. annle-vallev.nm.us
Brenda Johnson, Councilmember
City of Chatfield
322 Winona Street SE
Chatfield, MN 55923
hrenda.iohnsonna attalohal.net
Steve Larson, Mayor
City of New Brighton
2150 Erin Court
New Brighton, MN 55112
slevenlarsonl geomeast.net
Ray Melander, Mayor
City of Nevis
P.O. Box 214
Nevis, MN 56467
melanderr)o eot.com
League of Minnesota Cities Board of Directors
June 2003 — October 2004
H. Dan Ness, Mayor
City of Alexandria
4110 Minnesota Street, Ste. B
Alexandria, MN 56308
nesshdc rea-alo.com(Work)
arsiness c@rea-aln.com (Home)
Nelda Remus, City Clerk
City of Zimmerman
12980 Fremont Ave.
Zimmerman, MN 55398
nrcmus@sherbtel.net
Sandra Colvin Roy, Councilmember
City of Minneapolis
350 S. 5th Street, Rm 307
Minneapolis, MN 55415
Sandra.ceivinsoy@ci.minneapolis.mn.us
Mark Sather, City Manager
City of White Bear Lake
4701 Hwy. 61 N.
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
msather(2i.whitebearlake.ora
Terry Schneider, Councilmember
City of Minnetonka
15333 Boulder Creek Drive
Minnetonka, MN 55345
terrvschn(ctiowest.net
Jeffrey Weldon, Administrator
City of Redwood Falls
P.O. Box 10
Redwood Falls, MN 56283
i weldonrrici.redwo od-fall s.mn. us
Mark Winson, Chief Admin. Officer
City of Duluth
402 City Hall
411 W. 1a` Street
Duluth, MN 55802
m winson@,ci. duluth.mn.us
EX-OFFICIO MEMBERS
Past President
Michael McCauley, City Manager
City of Brooklyn Center
6301 Shingle Creek Parkway
Brooklyn Center, MN 55430-2199
m m ecaul evaci.brookhm-center.mn. us
AMM President
Jim Smith, Councilmember
City of Independence
3858 Independence Road
Maple Plain, MN 55359
iimsmithamchsi.com
NLC REPRESENTATIVES
(Non -Voting Members)
Del Haag, Councilmember
City of Buffalo
714NW 9'h Street
Buffalo, MN 55313
delhaaaamsn.com
Les Heitke, Mayor
City of Willmar
333SW6tSt
P,O. Box 755
Willmar, MN 56201
lheitkeOci.wi llmar.mn.us
It is possible that the selection criteria below may change based on the
LMC Board of Directors' discussion of governance issues in late
September. If this occurs, revised selection criteria will be sent to you in
advance of the Annual Conference. The following selection criteria has
been used in previous years, however, we have changed the dates to
correspond with the Annual Conference dates.
*************************************************************
Board Nominating Process and Selection Criteria
I. Board nomination process.
A. Nominating Committee Appointment and Orientation Process.
Beginning in August of every year the League will solicit
individuals interested in serving on the nominating committee.
Notice of solicitation of interest shall be placed in Cities Bulletin at
least twice. When necessary in order to get a sufficient number on
the committee, or to achieve appropriate balance, the Executive
Director may directly solicit city officials to be on the committee.
2. On or before September 15 of each year the League President shall
appoint a nominating committee of 8 to 12 city officials, consisting
of both elected and appointed officials with appropriate attention
paid to issues such as gender, city size, and geography. The
immediate past president of the Board of Directors will sit as an
ex-officio member of the Committee and shall be its Chair.
3. At least one week prior to the annual conference, the Executive
Director shall hold an orientation meeting of the nominating
committee in order to explain the nominating committee process
and to explain the Board selection criteria.
B. Recruitment and Nomination Process
1. Beginning in August of each year the League will solicit
Minnesota city officials interested in serving on the League of
Minnesota Cities Board of Directors. Notice of Board openings
and solicitation of interest shall be placed in the August Minnesota
Cities Magazine and shall run at least twice in the Cities Bulletin.
In addition, prior to September 1of each year, the Executive
Director shall mail to the chief administrative officer of each
member city a letter soliciting Board candidates and explaining the
process and selection criteria.
2. All candidates who wish to be considered by the nominating
committee must submit an appropriate written expression of
interest by September 24th. Additional material in support of
particular candidates may be submitted up to the date of the
nominating committee meeting.
3. Once the list of Board candidates has been compiled, the Executive
Director in conjunction with the nominating committee chair shall
develop an agenda and a schedule of interview times.
4. After considering the presentations of the various candidates, the
nominating committee shall make its recommendations based on
the requirements of the League Constitution and the Guidelines set
out herein.
5. In order to avoid the appearance of a conflict of interest,
nominating committee members should refrain from participating
in discussions involving candidates from cities that they represent.
6. Notice of the nominating committee's recommendations shall be
posted at a predetermined time in at least two locations at the
annual conference site. The location of the postings shall be
included in the material provided to conference attendees and shall
be directly communicated to prospective candidates.
7. The Chair of the nominating committee shall be responsible for
presenting the report of the nominating committee at the Annual
business meeting.
II. Board selection requirements and guidelines.
A. Constitutional Requirements.
The League Constitution requires that the Board of Directors shall
consist of an "elected president, an elected first vice president, an
elected second vice president, the immediate past president ex-
officio, the president of the Association of Metropolitan
Municipalities ex-officio, the president or vice president of the
National League of Cities, if a Minnesota City official, ex-officio,
and twelve directors,"
2. "To be eligible to be elected to serve, or to continue to serve as an
elective officer of the League, a person shall be an elected official
or an appointed employee."
3. The Board of Director shall include individuals recommended by
each of the following groups or entities: the city of Minneapolis,
the city of St. Paul, the Minnesota Association of Small Cities, and
the Coalition of Greater Minnesota Cities, Individuals
recommended by these groups shall go through the Board election
process.
4. Except for ex-officio seats, no city may have more than one
representative on the Board at any given time.
B. Non -binding Guidelines for the Nominating Committee to Consider
1. Geography
a. The nominating committee will attempt to respect an
appropriate balance of representation between Greater '
Minnesota and the Metropolitan area.
b. In this same regard, the Committee will strive to maintain a
similar balance when making recommendations for the
president, first vice-president, and second vice-president
positions.
c. No particular importance will be placed on where within
Greater Minnesota or the Metropolitan area a given
candidate comes from.
2. Population.
a. Board members should come from cities of differing size.
3. Gender
a. Every effort should be made to ensure gender equity on the
Board.
4. Position (Appointed v. Elected)
a. A majority of the Board should be elected city officials.
5. Term
a. Where there are other qualified candidates, Board members
should generally serve only one term.
b. An individual appointed to fill an unexpired Board term
will not be prejudiced by this guideline so long as the
unexpired term was for one year or less.
Application for
2004-05 LMC Board of Directors or
2004-05 LMC Officer Positions
All candidates for LMC Board of Directors or LMC Officers (President, First Vice President,
Second Vice President) positions are asked to submit the following items by September 24,
2004.
1) A cover letter stating your intent to run for an LMC Board or Officer position,
addressing the following points:
• Why you are interested in serving in this position;
• What specific attributes or experiences you would contribute to the Board or
Executive Committee (made up of the LMC Officers); and
• Whether you will be able to make the time commitment necessary to fulfill your Board
or Officer duties (monthly Board meetings, as well as two, two-day retreats).
2) A completed "Nomination Form for LMC Board of Directors/LMC Officers
Positions" (attached).
3) Optional: A resume that provides an overview of your municipal/professional
experience and accomplishments.
4) Optional: Letters of reference.
Note: The LMC Board of Directors expects to create job descriptions for director and officer
positions in early October, immediately in advance of the Annual Conference. Upon
completion, the appropriate job description will be sent to you.
Please return these materials by September 24, 2004 to:
Donyelle Mikacevich
League of Minnesota Cities
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
Nomination Form — LMC Board of Directors
PLEASE COMPLETE THE NOMINATION FORM PROVIDING AS MANY DETAILS AS
POSSIBLE. You are encouraged to attach other materials that may be useful to the Nominating
Committee during its deliberations, such as your resume and a letter stating your reasons for
seeking a League office.
Name:
Organization:
Address:
Home Phone: (
Title:
City/Zip:
Work Phone: ( ) E-mail:
1. Length of service in your present position:
years
2. Other municipal or related position(s) you have held and the number of years:
3. Previous League experience (e.g. committees, conferences, affiliate organizations, etc.)
4. Are you applying for (Please select one)
President 1st Vice President 2nd Vice President Director
5. If you are applying for Director, can you complete a full three-year term as a Board
member?
PLEASE RETURN THIS FORM BY September 24, 2004 TO:
Donyelle Milcacevich
League of Minnesota Cities
145 University Avenue West
St. Paul, MN 55103-2044
2004 Annual Conference & Markeplace Exhibitor's Information
Page 1 of 2
LMC Search Tools
Conferences
LATWE km
NCES r PUBU AU
LMC 2004 Annual Conference
Exhibitor Information
Register today for Minnesota's most popular ev
for city officials
Show hundreds of key city decision -makers --mayors, city managers,
councilmembers, administrators, and department heads --how your prodr
or services can benefit their communities. Meet the people who make it
happen in Minnesota cities. Participate in the 2004 Annual Conference e
Marketplace, Oct. 10-12 in Duluth, to:
• Reach an exclusive audience at the biggest event for city
officials.
• Get a high -visibility, high -traffic booth.
• Boost your visibility by advertising in the conference program
and donating a door prize.
• Enhance your presence by becoming an LMC Business
Partner
(deadline: Aug. 2)
• Receive conference -rate housing at the Holiday Inn Hotel &
Suites (deadline: Aug. 20)
• Receive a reduced rate by registering early
(deadline: Aug, 27)
Take your investment a long way
The League of Minnesota Cities is a statewide, nonprofit organization tb
represents more than 800 cities. We work on behalf of cities to provide
expertise and information through cooperation with our strong network
members. The League helps you reach our exclusive audience of city
officials. With 90 years of experience, we're a trusted resource for cities
local government issues, Our publications, web site, and various confere
and training events give city officials and staff the information they neec
We're the trusted partner you need to introduce your company, products.
services to our members. Our relationship with member cities makes yoi
marketing dollars go farther.
Conference Details:
Find out all the details of how to narticipate in the LMC 2004 Annual
http://www.lmnc.org/conf/exhibitors04.cfm 8/10/2004
2004 LMC Annual Conference At A Glance Page 1 of 1
2004 LMC Annual Conference & Marketplace
At A Glance
Sunday, October 10
11 a.m. Registration
11 a.m. Marketplace Grand Opening
11 a.m.-7 p.m. Marketplace open
1 p.m. Opening Keynote: Gwen Ifill
2:30-3:45 p.m. Concurrent Sessions I
4 p.m. Legislative Preview & Policy Development
5:30 p.m. Oktoberfest Marketplace & First Door Prize Drawing
7 p.m. City Night Oktoberfest
Monday, October 11
7 a.m. Registration opens
7 a.m. Sunrise at Marketplace
7-11 a.m. Marketplace open
8:30-9:45 a.m. Concurrent Sessions II
10 a.m. Marketplace Grand Finale & Second Door Prize Drawing
10:45 a.m. 2004 Cities Forum: One Minnesota -- Exploring Common Ground
12:15 p.m. Mayors' Association Luncheon & LMC Annual Meeting
2:30-4:30 p.m. Concurrent Sessions III
6 p.m. LMC Reception & Awards Banquet
Tuesday, October 12
7:30 a.m. Continental Breakfast & City Achievement Awards
9:30-10:45 Concurent Sessions IV
a.m.
11 a.m. Community Luncheon & Finale Keynote: Marcia Doty
Back to LMC 2004 Annual Conference & Marketplace page
http://www.lmnc.org/conf/annconfataglance04.htm 8/10/2004
2004 Annual Conference & Markeplace Exhibitor's Information Page 2 of 2
Conference & Marketplace:
• Download the Exhibitor Application (pdf)
• Dates, Location & Fees
• Exhibit Logistics, Floor Plan & Events
• Housing Options
(reserve by Aug. 20 to receive conference -rate lodging at
Holiday Inn Hotel & Suites)
• Three Ways to Boost Your Marketing Dollar
(Sponsor the Annual Conference; Donate a Door Prize &
Advertise in the Conference Program)
Host City Information:
• Visit the city of Duluth web site.
• Visit the Duluth Convention & Visitors Bureau web site.
Questions?
• Exhibiting questions: Cathy Dovidio
E-mail: cdovidio@Imnc,org. Phone: (651) 281-1250.
• Advertising/sponsorship questions: Lourdes Sanchez
E-mail: Isanchez@Imnc.org. Phone: (651) 215-4035.
Conference Calendar I Conference Registration
Annual Conference Update
City Resources I Legislative I LMCIT I HR I Library
Conferences I Publications I Other Services
Home I Site Features &Tips I Web Site Policy I Site Search
LMC Staff I What We Do I Press Room
Sponsorship & Advertising Opportunities I Cities Vendor Guide
Links I Listsery Sign Up
Copyright 02004 League of Minnesota Cities
145 University Ave. West, St Paul, MN55103
Phone:651-281-1200I Toll Free: 1-800-925.1122
Fat 651-281-1299 I TDD: 651-281-1290
Comments about the Site? Contact the Webmaster
This site is secure using Verisign
http://www.lmnc.org/conf/exhibitors04.cfm 8/10/2004