Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
12-06-05 CCMP
)ean Johnston Council members: Rita Conlin Steve DeLapp Liz Johnson Anne Smith Please read: Lake:Ehno City Council Tuesd y December 6, 2005 3800 Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 777-5510 777-9615 (fax) Since the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that decisions are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and experience. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings. If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recognized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if additional time is.needed before a decision can be made. Agenda City Council Meeting Convenes 7:00 PM Pledge of Allegiance 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: November 15, 2005 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: Public Inquiriesdnformational is an opportunity for citizens to bring the Council's attention any items not currently on the A. PUBLIC INQUIRIES: agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and B. PUBLIC INFORMAT/ONAL: address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for (1) Donation To Lake Elmo; Betsy each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that Lundquist individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the (2) John Elholm — Lake Elmo Park meeting or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. Reserve Master Plan 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution No. 2005-128:Approving claims B. Resolution No. 2005-130:Statutory Tort Limits on Liability Insurance C. 2006 Liquor Licenses D. Resolution No. 2005-129:Partial Payment to Tower Asphalt for Hilltop Avenue E. Workers' Compensation for Elected Officials; Resolution No. 2005-140 5. FINANCE A. Tax Levy Adoption:Resol. No. 2005-131 B. General Fund Budget:Resolution No. 2005-132 Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar forrnat. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. Lake Elmo City Council Agenda December 6, 2005 Page 2 6. NEW BUSINESS A. Out -of -State Travel Policy for City Council : Resolution No. 2005-133 7. MA1NTENANCE/P /BUILDING: A. Fire Department:Promote Mutual Aid Agreement; Resolution No. 2005-134 B. (1) Building Department:Update on Building Activities (2) Council Discussion of Side Yard Retaining Wall - Verbal (3) Relationship of Garage to Home Size — Verbal 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: Tom Prew A. Resolution No. 2005-135:Accept Feasibility Report for Phase IV Water System Interconnect Project and Order Public Hearing B. Agreement for Overhead Street Lighting on 10th Street and Keats Avenue C. Revised Authorization for Professional ServiceS:Civil Defense Sirens - Verbal 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: C. Dillerud A. Final Plat, Final PUD Plan and Site Plan — United Properties:Resolution No. 2005-136 B. 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program (DP) :Resolution No. 2005-137 C. Final Plat and Development Agreement: Sanctuary of Lake Elmo; Resolution No. 2005- 138 D. CDBG Application; Resolution No. 2005-139 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. Council Discussion Public Communication Personnel Issues — Council Member Johnson - Verbal 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Snowmobile Ordinance; Ordinance No. 97-164 B. 3M Park Donation - Verbal 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Johnston. B. Council Member Conlin C. Council Member DeLapp D. Council Member Johnson E. Council Member Smith LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: October 18 2005, November 1, 2005 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/1NFORMATIONAL: A. Public Informational 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-121: Approving Claims B. Resolution No. 2005-122:Approving Maplewood Oakdale Lions Charitable Gambling License C. Resolution No. 2005-124:Railroad Crossing Agreement for Water Systems Interconnect Phase III D. (1) Resolution No. 2005-125:Change Order fo Phase I (2) Resolution No. 2005-126:Change Order Phase III E. Ad Hoc Community Improvement eeAttendance 5. FINANCE: A. Public Hearing: Assessment for Proposd tJnpaid Municipal Utilities; Resolution No. 2005-123 B. Monthly Operating Report C. Truth N'Taxation, Proposed 6 NEWBUSINIESS: 7. NANCE/P A. Fire Depart (1) Resolutil'\ Adopting the National Incident iley Water Project y Water Project (2 5-128, Adopting and Promoting the Use Mutuai 'd Agreements — NOT ADOPTED B. Update on Building Department: Activities:JimMcNamara 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONNG: A. Alternative Septic Treatment — Austad, Pierre, Hurt B. Comprehensive Plan Update — verbal 10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: 11. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor Johnston called the Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers: PRESENT: Conlin, Smith, Johnston, Johnson, City Planner Dillerud, City Engineer Prew, City Attorney Filla, Building Official Jim McNamara, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet. ABSENT: Council member DeLapp LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCILES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 1. AGENDA: M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to approve the November 15, 2005 City Council agenda, as amended. (Motion passed 4-0). 2. MINUTES: October 18 2005 M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve the October 18, 2005 City Council Minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 4-0). MINUTES: November I, 2005 M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to approve the November 1, 2005 City Council Minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 4-0). 3. PUBLIC INOUIRIES/INFORNIATIONAL: A. Public Infoimational A resident at 8740 Stillwater Blvd., asked if he could split his Lcres in Residential Estates zoning. The City Planner noted this has been an unjednted action as this has never been asked before. Such a request would require a Gomprehenswe Plan amendment, rezoning and a variance. The Council sug sted that the resident get together with the planner and initiate the process. - 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-121: Ajitirovin M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to adopt Resolutiorik '',*esolution Approving Claim Numbers 290, 291, DD561 through DD572, 28187,:through 28218 which were used for Staff Payroll dated Novemger0 2005 and claims 28219 through 28268 in the total amount of $101,958 87 fionssed 4 B. Resolution No2005422 Aptrovino Maplewood Oakdale Lions Charitable:GambliiiitLicense The Maplewood -Oakdale LioWs resting its annual One -Day (February 6, 2006), - Off -Site GarnbhnLicense to sellraffitf and hold bingo at the Lake Elmo Inn. M/S/P Johnson/Co o adopt%Resolution No. 2005-122, A Resolution Approving the Issuance of a CharitabIeGmb1mg License by the State of Minnesota to the Maplewood/Oakdale Lions-.?' (Motion passed 4-0). C. Railroad Crossing Aa-reement for Water Systems Interconnect Phase III In his memo dated November 10, 2005, the City Engineer reported the portion of water main that crosses under the railroad bridge on Stillwater Boulevard requires a Pipeline crossing agreement. The Railroad requires $1,500 License Fee with this agreement. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-124, A Resolution Approving The Agreement Covering A Pipeline Crossing at Lake Elmo. (Motion passed 4-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 D. (1) Resolution No. 2005-125:Chaue Order for Chris Riley Water Project Phase I In his memo dated November 10, 2005, the City Engineer reported due to the late completion of the Phase I Project by the contractor, they entered into discussions with them regarding liquidated damages for that project. As a result of those talks, the City agreed to deduct $10,000 from monies due them and to have them install Phase V water main at an agreed upon price of $20,000. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-125, Resolution Approving Change Order No. 1 for Chris Riley Water Systems Interconnect Project Phase I. (Motion passed 4-0). (2) Resolution No. 2005-126:Change Order for Chrg'kiley Water Proiect Phase III In his memo dated November 10, 2005, the City Enginettaorted dueito the hurricanes in the Gulf area, the availability of polyethylene pipe is very short suppiy The contractor has had his order for pipe delayed and th,ice substantially increased as a result of these conditions. The City has agreed to er: of this project. Staff is recommending that the point o water service to the Farms of Lake Elmo be,ri leted remainder of the project next spring. MIS/P Johnson/Conlin - to adopt Change Order No. 1 for Chris (Motion passed 4-0). ompletion date for a portion project necessary to give and complete the 05-126, A Resolution Approving ystes Interconnect Project Phase III. E. Ad Hoc Commumtv ImDrovement Committee Attendance At the direction of. 'e Council CICas directed to review the absence of Jill Anderson and their rneeting schedule. At their November 9th meeting, the CIC recommended that Commissioner Jill Anderson be removed from the CIC for cause and hoped Ms. Anderson will realy when her time permits. The CIC has established a quarterly meeting schedule 2006. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to remove Jill Anderson from the Community Improvement Commission for non -response and to thank her for her service to the City. (Motion passed 4-0). Mayor Johnston indicated the Community Improvement Commission was never intended to be an Ad Hoc Committee and asked that this item be added to the next Council Committee agenda. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCILNOVEMBER 15, 2005 5. FINANCE: A. Public Hearing: Assessment for Proposed Unpaid Municipal Utilities; Resolution No. 2005-123 The Finance Director reported the City by State Statute and City Code has the authority to assess property owners for unpaid utilities and services. All property owners were sent letters regarding past due Municipal utilities balances. Notification of the Public Hearing was published in the Lake Elmo Leader on November 4, 2005. Property owners will have until November 30, 2005 to pay the balance due without interest or a fee of $25, whichever is greater. Mayor Johnston opened up the public hearing at 7:17 p.m. in the Council chambers. There was no one to speak for or against the unpaid municipal utilities. Mayor Johnston closed the public hearing at 7:18 p.m. M/S/P Johnson/Johnston. - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-123? Certification to Washington County Auditor for Unpaid Utility Bills: ,{Motion passed 4- 0). B. Truth N'Taxation, Proposed Budget The Truth and Taxation Hearingis schedulel scheduled for the December 6th Council meet December 12th is the date scheduled. 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. MAINENANCE/PA A. Fire Department. Resolution No 2005-127 Adopting the National Incident anagement System Fire Chief Malmquist reported that as Minnesota continues to implement Homeland Security Presidential Di (HSPD) 5 and 8, the National Incident Management System (NIMS) is a key e1ient to compliance and effective implementation. The NIMS system makes the nation and Minnesota safer by establishing the uniform response processes, protocols, and procedures for all emergency responders. solution Authorizing 7 p.m. with the adoption ng needs to be continued, M/S/P Johnson/Smith — to adopt Resolution No. 2005-127, Designation of the National Incident Management System as the Basis for All Incident Management in the City of Lake Elmo. (Motion 4-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 4 (2) Resolution No 2005-128, Adopting and Promoting the Use of Intrastate Mutual Aid Agreements In the letter dated May 18, 2005, it indicates there are nine steps needed for initial implementation of HSPD 5 and 8 and for initial NIMS ICS compliance are identified in a memo dated March 10, 2005, entitled National Incident Management System: Incident Command System Elements Implementation to Minnesota. The Council did not receive a copy of the memo dated March 10, 2005. M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to delay action on this agenda item in order to obtain the March 10, 2005 Memo. (Motion passed 4-0.) B. Update on Building Department: Activities:Jim McNamara The Building Official reported there were five new residential perthtts and one new commercial permit issued for October, 2005. 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: 9. PLANNING, LAND USE,AND ZONING: .. ' A. Alternative Septic Treatment — Austad Pierre urt The City Planner reported the Cityreceived a,letter o Attorney Rooney on behalf of the property owners located at comerthnorthwestofHighlands Trail and Hytrail. The letter requests the City's assistance to either hook e,homto the Metropolitan Sewer line at 54th Street in Oakdale or locate a site on:,City . roperty with the DeMontreville Nature area on whielvio construct eonventional drain field. The petitioners have in' dicated th,....atffiey will pay costs of whichever alternate is pursued. The Planner noted that the Ci sites on some of the high,' wastewater could be pmiped and in the City. If the pipe and dram fields appropriate connection fee and quarterly service fee would be charged the property owners, and the City would maintain that infrastructure —still to be constructed at the property owners expense.' o ate a conventional draM field site or n the DeMontreville Natural area to which ated...much like the several existing 201 systems come City infrastructure (as are the 201's) the Mr. Austad said they have a septic designer if the City wants to proceed with siting a three home system in the wilderness park area. The Council thought this was a workable solution for a health and safety issue. The City Administrator added the project would be under the City Engineer's control and any costs would be reimbursed. The City would bare no costs for the solution. M/S/P Johnston/Johnson — to direct the staff to work with the three homeowners (Austad/Pierre/Hurt) on Hytrail Avenue in the direction of a community treatment on Lake Demontreville wilderness area and meet the designer requirements of the city engineer and any costs would be reimbursed by the property owners. (Motion passed 4-0) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 Attorney Filla noted there was no public hearing required. Council member Johnson suggested informing all the residents in the area and to allow them to comment. Mr. Austad said he would get the septic designer and send a report to TKDA. B. Comprehensive Plan Update — verbal The City Planner provided a letter he drafted to Phyllis Hanson, Local Planning Assistance Manager of the Metropolitan Council, in response to her letter of September 26 initiating "a preliminary review dialogue" regarding the City's 2005-2030 Comp Plan submission to the Metropolitan Council. The Council changed the sentence on the second page, 1st paragraph, to read as follows "The City Council unanimously adopted a Motion directing me to advise the Metropolitan Council that the City Council finds Conditions 3, Xii) and (ii) not to be in compliance with State Statute providing that the Metropopan Council may attach only "reasonable" conditions to time extension for plan submis0On." 10. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: The City Administrator reported that the City of allowing them to share our salt facility at the ne with our cooperative relationship with Oakdale costs would be and take preliminary steps which The questions raised by Council weithe nurn deterioration and increase in traf The Council consensus was to with the City of Oakd*n The Washington County Ad 11. CITY COUN' Oakdaleproached him to consider ublic corks facility. In continuation -w-e Wald evaluate what facility wouldborne by the City of Oakdale. of yearsforthe agreement, cost of road n for the City Administrator to work project with Oakdale. 1Strator§1cted Martin Rafferty as their Chairman. TS: Mayor Johnston annou CUtake Elmo Library will be opening in December. Council member Johnson a d the public that December lst the Minnesota State Demographer will have a demographics presentation at 6:30 p.m. at the Grand in Stillwater. The Council Adjourn the meeting 8 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Resolution No. 2005-121 Claims Resolution No. 2005-122 Maplewood Oakdale Lions Charitable Gambling License Resolution No. 2005-123 Assessment for Unpaid Municipal Utilities LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 6 Resolution No. Phase III Resolution No. Resolution No. Resolution No. 2005-124 Railroad Crossing Agreement for Water Systems Interconnect 2005-125 Change Order for Chris Riley Water Project Phase 2005-126 Change Order for Chris Riley Water Project Phase III 2005-127 National Incident Management System LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 15, 2005 7 MINUTES APPROVED: November 15, 2005 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 6:00 P.M. CLOSED SESSION — Adjustment Performance Review/Salary Adjustment 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: October 18, 2005 - POSTPONED 3 PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. Public Inquiries - None B. Public Informational: (1) Senior Housing Survey:Brenda Anderson, CIC (2) Ground Breaking Date of November 3rd for Public Works Facility 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-115:Approving claims B. Partial Payment No. 2 to G.M. Contracting:Resolution No. 2005-116 C. Escrow Reduction for Cardinal View 5. FINANCE 6. NEW BUSINESS: A. Request for Extended Work Hours:Hoffman, DeMontreville Trail B. Community Improvement Commission Appointments C. Administrator Review/Salary Adjustment 7. MAIN IINANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING: A. Fire Department Handbook 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Accept Feasibility Report on Water Project for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights and Conduct Infonnational Hearing:Resolution No. 2005-117 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Moving Building into City:Hardy; Resolution No. 2005-118 B. Zoning Ordinance:Text Amendment — Repeal OP Conditional Use — AG/RR Zones:Ordinance No. 97-163 C. Final Plat and Development Agreement — Park Meadows:Resolution No. 2005-120 D. Comprehensive Plan System Statement — Resolution No. 2005-119 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Snowmobile Ordinance: Ordinance No. 97-164 - POSTPONED 12. al Y COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Johnston called the Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. PRESENT: Conlin, Smith, Johnston, Johnson, DeLapp, City Engineer Prew, Building Official McNamara, Attorney Filla, City Planner Dillerud, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet and Administrator Rafferty, LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINU I LS NOVEMBER 1, 2005 I. AGENDA: Delete: 11A. Snowmobile Ord, Add: 9D. Comprehensive Plan System Statement; Move 8A. Informational Meeting on Water Project at top of agenda. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp — to approve the November 1, 2005 City Council agenda, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). 2. MINUTES: October 18, 2005 The Council received the October 18, 2005 City Council minutes at the meeting. M/S/P JohnsonfDeLapp - to postpone the October 18, 2005 City Council minutes until the November 15, 2005 City Council meeting. (Motion passed 5-0). 3. PUBLIC INOUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. Public Inquiries - NONE B. Public Informational: (1) Senior Housing Survey:Brenda Anderson, CIC Brenda Anderson, Community Improvement Member, reported the 100 Senior Housing Surveys, out of 300 surveys passed out, indicated that 86% of the respondents believe that the City has a need for senior housing and 73 % of the respondents would consider or move into senior housing in Lake Elmo, but they did not want senior housing along Interstate 94. She said many seniors in the City would like to stay in Lake Elmo and have affordable housing. She said the City needs to identify appropriate senior housing that would be suitable in the City. The City could hire a professional consulting organization that would research, identify and plan for senior housing in. the City. Council member Conlin suggested sharing this information with Bob Engstrom, Master Planner. The Council will discuss this item at the December Council Committee meeting. (2) Ground Breaking Date of November 3rd for Public Works Facility The City of Lake Elmo will break ground for the new Public Works Facility and Water Tower on November 3, 2005 at 4:00 p.m. Both facilities will be constructed on the northeast corner of Highway 5 and Ideal Avenue. 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-115:Annrovin2 claims M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-115, A Resolution Approving Claim Numbers 287, 288, DD551 through DD560, 28129 through 28143 which were used for Staff Payroll dated October 27, 2005: Claims 289, 28144 through 28185, in the total amount of $361,232.59. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 2 B. Partial Payment No. 2 to G.M. Contractina:Resolution No. 2005-116 Tn his memo dated October 28, 2005, the City Engineer reported the work is nearly complete on the Water System Interconnect — Phase 11 Project and recommended approval of Partial Payment No.2 in the amount of $24,900.36. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-116, A Resolution Approving Partial Payment No. 2 to G.M. Contracting for Water System Interconnect — Phase II Project in the amount of $24,900.36, verified by the City Engineer in his memo dated October 28, 2005. (Motion passed 5-0). C. Escrow Reduction for Cardinal View In his memo dated October 20, 2005, the City Engineer reported improvements on Cardinal View are generally complete except for the final lift of blacktop. The final inspection of the storm sewer has not been scheduled. The City Engineer has certified by his October 20, 2005 memo that the required development security can be reduced from $57,968.75 to $23,250.00. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to approve the reduction of the Development Security requirement for Cardinal View from $57,968.75 to $23,250.00 based on the recommendation of the City Engineer in his memo dated October 20, 2005. (Motion passed 5-0). 5. FINANCE: 6. NEW BUSINESS: A. Request for Extended Work Hours:Hoffman, DeMontreville Trail Joe Hoffman requested a special permit from the City for extended working hours for his contractors pursuant to City Code, Section 1370.03B, for the construction of a new home under construction at 7850 DeMontreville Trail. Mr. Hoffman is requesting only the weekend extension, limited by Code to the hours of 1:00 p.m. to 5 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and Holidays through December 18. Hoffman said his main reason for the request is due to possible inclement weather that could delay completion and the availability of time and amount of time needed by himself and the crew to complete the construction of his future residence. M/S/P Smith/Johnson - to approve a special permit to Joe Hoffman to extend working hours for the construction of a home at 7850 DeMontreville Trail. This permit will allow work during the hours of 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturdays, Sundays and holidays thou5h December 18, 2005. (Motion passed 5-0). Council Member Conlin indicated since the Council has had to address several of these variance requests, the Council should discuss the noise ordinance in regard to limiting construction working hours. M/S/P Conlin/DeLapp - that construction working hours be broughtthe Council Committee in December. (Motion passed 5-0.) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 B. Community Improvement Commission Appointments The City received a resignation letter from Stacy Howieson in August. The CIC currently has one vacancy and an attendance issue for another commissioner who has not responded to attempts to contact and is on leave of absence from work. The CIC has had difficulty forming a quorum and cancelled two meetings. There are currently no applications on file. Staff continues to advertise for applicants. M/S/P Smith/Johnson - to accept the resignation of Stacy Howieson as a member of the Community Improvement Commission, and to thank her for service to the City. (Motion passed 5-0.) Staff requested Council direction with regard to Commissioner Jill Anderson's continued absence. Council member Conlin pointed out that according to the resolution adopting the CIC which states the Commission shall meet quarterly, or as often as required to respond to specific requests from the Council for advice or recommendations. The CIC has been meeting monthly so should attendance be calculated on monthly or quarterly meetings. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to direct the CIC to review absence of Jill Anderson and review attendance per quarterly meetings and not monthly meetings. (Motion passed 5-0). MJS/P Smith/Johnson - to reappoint Joan Ziertman to a two-year term on the Community Improvement Commission. (Motion passed 5-0). M/S/P Smith/Johnson - to reappoint Gary Rieder to a two-year teiin on the Community Improvement Commission. (Motion passed 5-0). C. Administrator Review/Salary Adjustment Mayor Johnston explained the Council met in a closed session to discuss the. Administrator's review and Salary adjustment. The Council recommended three percent increase effective May 1, 2005. M/S/P Johnston/Johnson — to approve the City Administrator's salary adjustment, based on the current compensation plan which is in place. (Motion passed 5-0.) The Finance Director added that the Council voiced concerns on the compensation system and will be looking into revising the system. 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUTT ,DING: A. Fire Department Handbook LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER I, 2005 4 The City Administrator reported this document is moving forward so the Fire Department employees can have a reference. Every member of the Council will have a copy and asked to make comments. 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Accept Feasibility Report on Water Project for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heihts and Conduct Informational Hearin:Resolution No. 2005-117 The City Engineer provided and summarized the Feasibility Report on the Water Project for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights neighborhoods. Larry Moody, 8268 Stillwater Blvd., asked what the costs to residents once connected to water. The Finance Director responded that the average water bill would be $200-240 a year, approx. $20 per month, depending on members in household and lawn sprinkling. The Finance Director said the water prices are pretty comparable to the operation and maintenance of a private well. The City Engineer said this cost will be offset by reduced homeowner's insurance costs due to fire hydrants being available, the elimination of repair/replacement cost to their well and pump, the costs of well testing in the future and an increase in their property value that will result from converting the homes to a public water supply. Marsha Zafft, 2773 Inwood Avenue N., asked how long has the City worked on this. The Administrator responded since March, 2005. She said that her well was tested, nothing was found, but both daughters had been tested and have some of the highest carcinogens. She asked what happens to their gardens or raspberry bushes that are contaminated. The City Engineer explained that the water drawn from municipal wells, which there are two wells, are fax away from the contaminated area and the wells are tested every month. Terry Needham, 2970 Jamley Avenue N., asked when did the elected officials meet with 3M. The Administrator answered that he was made aware of the water problem in late February of 2005 and the Council did not know about this before then. The City asked Public Health and MPCA to have a meeting and have met monthly. He said 3M reps have been invited to meetings and during the eight months have looked at short term and long term action plans. Needham said that we all knew 3M screwed up two aquifers and why should we have to pay. Why doesn't the City say 3M you pay the water bills. He said it is not ridit....they knew they were dumping drums. Mayor Johnston said he understood the residents' concern and the Council could approach 3M with a proposition to have the company pay water bills. Attorney Filla said the residents may want to approach 3M en masse because they would have more rights in this than the City. Filla said the City has broad authority to require the affected residents to hookup to water under a safety, health and welfare mandate. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 5 Bill Hughes, 9038 31 St. N., stated the person responsible for contaminating wells should be responsible to pay our water bills. He asked why not lay sewer pipes now when the street is tom up. He also asked if there is a backup plan for the community dramn. field system for the Farms of Lake Elmo in case of freeze-up due to the cold weather and lack of snow. The City Engineer explained there is not a great deal of disturbance to lay water pipes and there is no sewer planned for the next 25 years. Terry Arends, 8815 27th Street, stated our street was to be repaired, but you can't do the street until next year. Therefore, he asked, won't you have some money left over since you already started the project. The Administrator responded there is no money left over. Arends asked what happens if our current well is bad. He was told the Public Health Dept. would provide water if you exceeded health limit similar to the 19 homes. Carbon filtration will be added. He asked if the City could provide a place to obtain water. Dave Moore, 8680 Stillwater Blvd., said he has a polluted well in one of the highest polluted areas. He asked why the City can't serve the highest polluted area n the first phase of the water project Bob Helwig, 8247 27th Street, stated he has ground elevations that are higher and his concern is the head pressure on those higher elevations. The City Engineer said a temporary booster pumping station would be built to service the southern portion of Lake Elmo Heights 3rd Addition, as it is in a higher pressure zone than the rest of the project area. In the future, a permanent booster pump station is planned. Steve Chlebech, 9018 315t Street, stated he just put in a new private well a year ago because he needed it and the water has tested clean. He asked what the chances are of being reimbursed because he believes 3M should pay for the new well. Tom Regan, 8875 27th Street, stated with the spraying into our aquifers, is it possible sink back lower than Oakdale. Is it possible these wells would clear up? The Administrator responded this is a new area of science, doesn't believe that would change it, and try to find alternative ways to clean it. The City Administrator reported an appraiser established property value, taking into account home built a certain size, at a certain time and any impact due to the circumstance, the extension of municipal water would have a positive impact of $42,000. Barbara Peterson, 3010 Janero Avenue, asked in regard to soil contamination, would the agencies do soil tests on our property. She said 3M contaminated this area and they should pay for our water until we sell the house. The Administrator responded they have not discussed soil tests. The Mayor asked the Council to approach the resolution within the money available and then pursue with another motion to address residents' concerns. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 6 Terry Needham asked if a motion would preclude the City from talking to 3M. Staff told him the property owners have more rights than the City to talk to 3M. M/S/P Johnston/Conlin — to adopt Resolution No. 2005-117, as amended (Change #4 to read:The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of the 3M Community Improvement Grant.), which will extend the municipal water supply to the 214 existing homes of Lake Elmo Heights and Tablyn Park neighborhoods as well as the sealing of existing private wells except for a few wells that will be test wells.(Motion passed 5-0.) M/S/P Conlin/DeLapp - to direct staff to talk with 3M concerning how to address concerns in terms of compensation of water charges up until the date they sell their home and also circumstance where pumps and wells recently replaced can be reimbursed; and to direct staff to work with Minnesota Department of Health on soil testing and request the City Engineer to look at running the pipe for the most polluted areas first. (Motion passed 5-0.) A class action lawyer spoke up and said she represented the plaintiffs in the case against 3M and her firm was conducting private testing on residents' blood and they have been finding the chemicals in very high levels. She said that she and her associates have been working on the case against 3M for about a year. Dawn Brady, Lake Elmo Heights resident, asked the Council to consider the potential water costs for 3 acre lot. 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Moving Building into Citv:Hardy; Resolution No. 2005-118 The City Planner reported the Planning Commission recommended approval of this application to move a house and detached garage structure a few hundred feet across 31 Street North adjacent to 9255 31st Street N. The Council had previously approved a zoning variance to allow a dwelling unit on the 17,000 sq.ft. parcel to which the house and garage are proposed to be moved. The Council's condition to the variance requiring proof of septic system feasibility on the site was addressed by a certified Septic Designer's report that a primary drain field of sufficient size could be constructed on the site, but any backup drainfield would have to be of a mound design. The City Planner pointed out variance was granted to allow a nonconforminga single family dwelling and there was always the intent to move the garage. Council member DeLapp stated it's an ugly looking garage and there's nothing historical about it. There is no characteristic restoration. He said this is a three -car garage and not suitable on a .4 of acre lot. Council member Smith stated she believes the City will have problems with the approval of the request to move an historic structure on a sub -standard lot. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 7 The City anner said he didn't agree with the Council arguing the original variance based on the historic character of the house, but that was the Council's finding for voting in favor of that variance. Linda Hardy said she did indicate they were planning on moving the farmhouse and garage. She said she would paint the garage in matching colors and will make the garage compatible to the house. She said she will be storing building materials in the garage. M/S/P Johnston/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-118 approving a pennit to Linda Hardy to move a house and garage to a vacant parcel on 31st Street North pre plans staff dated October 20, 2005 subject to the applicant posting -the appropriate financial security with the City to complete the move and improvements proposed within 12 months. (Motion passed 4-1DeLapp) B. Zoning Ordinance:Text Amendment — Repeal OP Conditional Use — AG/RR Zones:Ordinance No. 97-163 The City Planner reported the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and adopted a recommendation to amend the Zoning Ordinance text by repealing the Conditional Use Permit provision of the RR and AG zones. This action will render the OP Ordinance (which remains in the Code) inoperative The Commission was advised by staff that it is probable staff will recommend that these provisions be added back to the zoning ordinance at such time as the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, and any redrafted zoning ordinance/map response to that Plan, becomes effective. M/S/P Johnston/Conlin — to adopt Ordinance 97-163, An Ordinance repealing the Open Space Development Conditional Use Permit from the AG and RR zoning districts. (Motion passed 5-0.) Attorney Filla said no project that has received preliminary plat approval will be affected by this. The Planner said OP part of Lakewood church project does not have concept plan approval yet. C. Final Plat and Development Agreement — Park Meadows:Resolution No. 2005-120 The City Planner reported that Barbara Berquist and J. P. Bush Homes have submitted an 8 lot Residential Estates submission and submitted Final Plat drawings and construction plans. The Planner handed out a copy of the Development Agreement. Council member DeLapp said he didn't see anything on landscaping and will not retain the rural character that has been provided. The Planner responded there is a final landscape plan in the file and there are covenants. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL NOVEMBER 1, 2005 8 Attorney Filla said the declaration of covenants doesn't specifically require the landscaping on individual lots. He said if there is a concern on the entrance, the Council can implement a landscape plan restriction on the developer. MIS/P Johnson/Conlin — to adopt Resolution No. 2005-120, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement of Park Meadows. (Motion passed 5-0.) The Planner reported the City has received a letter from the applicant appealing the fee calculated for park dedications. Joe Bush confirmed the applicant's appeal of the park dedication fee calculations by the City and requested the City reduce the amount of the escrow the applicant must provide the City while the appeal is considered by the court. The City Planner recommended that no escrow reduction be approved by the City Council since there is no certainty that a court will approve the park dedication fee reduction. He noted that the amount of escrow will be the exact amount of the calculated park dedication fee, which will be payable in full by the applicant should the court decide that a reduction is not warranted. Joe Bush responded there is no longer any action requested of the Council. D. Comprehensive Plan Systems Statement The City Planner explained he has reviewed the September 12, 2005 Systems Statement issued by the Metropolitan Council and found that certain elements of the Systems Statement are inconsistent with the intent and purpose of the Memorandum of Understanding between the Metropolitan Council and the City, and inconsistent with the Comp Plan prepared by the City responsive to the Memorandum of Understanding as follows: 1. Designation of the residential areas of the City not planned for service by Region Sewer as "Diversified Rural" by the 2030 Development Framework and the Systems Statement. 2. The geographic extent and location of "Developing Area: and the designation of "Diversified Rural" on Map W-7 of the Systems Statement. The Council found the requirement of Page T-3 of the Systems Statement for the City's Comp Plan to identify a park -and -ride facility at 1-94 and Keats as depicted by the Park and Ride Facility Plan to be inconsistent with the City's previously stated opposition to a park -and -ride facility at that location. M/S/P JohnstoniDeLapp - to approve the staff recommendations and adopt Resolution No. 2005-119 Requesting a Hearing to resolve the stated disagreements over the content of the Lake Elmo Systems Statement as provided for by State Statute and to invite District 12 Metropolitan Council Member Chris Georgacas to come and meet with the Council. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 9 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: B. Snowmobile Ordinance: Ordinance No. 97-163 — POSTPONED 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Johnston reported the Lake Elmo Library is within a day to be turned over to Washington County and opening date is December 15, 205. He also reported that the Ramsey Center for the Arts have volunteer staff' members, which is running remarkably well. Council Member Smith congratulated Senn and Youngdahl, who were awarded the fourth annual People's Choice Award for their model home at 9986 Tapestry Road. The Council Adjourn the meeting at 9:54 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Resolution No. 2005-115 Claims Resolution No.2005-116 Partial Payment No. 2, G.M. Contracting Resolution No. 2005-117 Accept Feasibility Report on Water Project for Tablyn Park/Lake Elmo Heights Resolution No. 2005-118 Move Building into City:Hardy Resolution No. 2005-119 Comprehensive Plan System Statement Resolution No. 2005-120 Final Plat for Park Meadows Ordinance No. 97-163 Repeal OP CUP — AG/RR Zones LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES NOVEMBER 1, 2005 10 MINUTES APPROVED: November 15, 2005 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 6:30 p.m. CLOSE D SESSION: Administrator Performance Review 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: July 5, 2005, September 6, 2005 3. PUBLIC ENQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. PUBLIC INQUIRIES B. PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL: (1) Set Date for Ground Breaking for Public Works Facility 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-108: Approving Claims B. Resolution No. 2005-109: Approving Stonegate Street Vacation 5. FINANCE: A. Monthly Operating Report 6. NEW BUSINESS: A. Administrator Performance/Salary Ad' ent - Postponed 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING: A. Fire Department: (1) Appoint Captains (2) Pumper/Tanker: Resolution No. 2005-113 B. Update on Building Dept. Activities: Jim McNamara 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. North Water System Extension Presentation B. Award Bid for Elevated Water Tower — Resolution No. 2005-114 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Shoreland Overlay Variance; 8148 Hill Trail, Fazzone — Resolution No. 2005-110 B. Oakdale Gun Club — CUP Amendment; Resolution No. 2005-111 C. Final Plat and Development Agreement — Farms of Lake Elmo, Resolution No. 2005-112 D. Highway 5 By-pass Study E. Environmental Resources Mapping — Washington County Conservation District 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Snowmobile Ordinance, Ordinance No. 97-163 — Postponed B. Site for the South Fire Station 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor Johnston called the Council meting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the Council chambers. PRESENT: Conlin, Smith, Johnston, Johnson, DeLapp, City Engineer Prew, City LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 Planner Dillreud, Building Official Jim McNamara, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet and Administrator Rafferty. 1. AGENDA ADD: P.I. Joe Chavez, Request to address the Council M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson — to approve the October 18, 2005 City Council azenda, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). 2. MINUTES: July 5, 2005 M/S/P DeLapp/Smith — to approve the July 5, 2005 City Council Minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). MINUTES: September 20, 2005 M/S/P Smith/Johnson — to approve the September 20, 2005 City Council Minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. Public Inquiries Joe Chavez presented a request for an easement on land locked Sunfish Lake property that he owns. The property in question lies immediately south for the Hamlet on Sunfish Lake subdivision. Mr. Chavez's attorney has been discussing this issue with our City Attorney. Attorney Filla said he wasn't sure it was the City's fault to landlock this parcel. The Council asked Mr. Chavez to come back with a proposal. Ed Nielsen provided a procedure for meeting minutes required for the Mayor, Council, and staff when meeting with individuals relative to Lake Elmo interests. Nielsen pointed out that he considered the March 24th minutes by the City Administrator incomplete because he left out discussion on land exchange for Sunfish Park. The City Administrator reported that he and the Mayor had a discussion with the County Administrator and Commissioner Pulkrabek pertaining to acquiring 15 or more acres of regional park land, presently not being used, for the purpose of a fire station, public park and potential city hall site directly on Lake Elmo. The concept was well received and referred to the Regional Park Comprehensive Planning Committee for consideration. The committee suggested the City Administrator continue to pursue the possibility. The Administrator reported that the land would not be able to be purchased but traded for City land of equal value. (See Page 8 - Site for Fire Station) Administrator Rafferty thanked Mr. Nielsen for providing possible sites for the tower/public works facility and the 3M site is one that the City pursued. B. Set Date for Ground Breaking for Public Works Facility The Administrator reported the Contractor will be notifying him of dates, probably the first week of November, for ground breaking. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 2 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-108:Approving Claims M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp — to adopt Resolution No. 2005-108 approving claim numbers 285, 286, DD539 through DD550, 28045 through 28075 which were used for Staff Payroll dated October 13, 2005 and claims 28076 through 28128 in the total amount of $180,967.45. (Motion passed 5-0). B. Resolution No. 2005-109:APoroving Stonegate Street Vacation At its August 16, 2005 meeting, the City Council directed staff to draft a resolution to result in a vacation of the three access points as described by the City Engineer. The City Attorney has drafted the resolution vacating those portions of streets located within Stonegate Addition and the Stonegate 2nd Addition. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-109, A Resolution Vacating Portions of Streets Located Within Stonegate Addition and Stonegate Second Addition. (Motion passed 5-0). . FINANCE: A. Monthly Operating Report The Finance Director provided the Council with an October Monthly Operating Report - Revenue. He noted that the Excel bills have gone up, but the warm October weather has helped. 6. NEW BUSINESS: A. Administrator Performance/Salary Adjustment - DELETED 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING: A. Fire Department: (1) Appoint Captains Fire Chief Malmquist reported it was a tough decision to make when you have five very - qualified candidates and only four captain positions. The Fire Chief presented the four candidates promoted to Captain. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to approve the appointment of Captain to Bruce Cohen, Chad Sonmer, Mike Tremain, and Raymond Yarusso. (Motion passed 5-0). (2) Pumper/Tanker:Resolution No. 2005-113 The Finance Director reported the City received sealed bids from three vendors for a new fire pumper/tank truck on August 22, 2005. The Fire Department reviewed the bid proposals and concluded that General Safety is the apparent low bidder. The submitted price quotes are valid until October 22, 2005. Due to the length of time it took during the bid analysis, the Finance Department has not received the financing options, but staff will have finance package options by November 1, 2005. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 Listed below is the complete cost of the new pumper/tanker less finance related expenditures: Chassis & Body $426,690.00 Equipment $ 18,000.00 Radio $ 4,420.00 Graphics $ 2,150.00 Misc. (est.) $ 500.00 (Registration, Plate & Issuance $451,760.00 M/S/P Smith/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-113, A Resolution Awarding the Contract for the Purchase of a new Pumper/Tanker to General Safety, for their base bid of $424,810, Alternate 1 of $780 and Alternate 2 of $1100 for a total bid of $426,690 and financing will be discussed separately. (Motion passed 5-0). B. Update on BuildingDept. Activities: Jim McNamara The Building Official reported there were two new residential building permits and no new commercial buildings permits for the month of September. He explained that signs in illegal areas and right-of-ways are being removed and owners have been contacted as to where these signs can be picked up. 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. North Water System Extension Presentation: The City Engineer gave a presentation on the North Water System Extension. He reported the new neighborhoods of The Sanctuary, Discover Crossing, Deer Glen and Lakewood Church and area around them between Highway 36 and Keats and the eastern City border would mean as many as 312 new holes to the aquifer if the neighborhoods utilize private wells rather than City water. Prew explained that the north water extension would consist of a link from the 55th Street well to the Sanctuary development, then to Discover Crossing, then to Deer Glen and finally a link to the neighbors around Keats Avenue. The total cost for improvements would be $485,000 without the easements. There are no assessments proposed for water main laid in these easements. The City would collect $405,000 in water connection fees from new residents of the three neighborhoods. In addition he estimated the amount of revenue the City would eventually receive from property not yet developed that would be utilizing the new water main would be $675,000. After subtracting the cost of construction from the total future connection fees, the City would make $595,000 in net revenue. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to authorize the City Engineer to prepare plans and specifications for the two sections of water mains for the North Water System Extension and authorize staff to begin the property acquisition of process from private property owners. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 4 Susan Dunn stated it is said in the comprehensive plan that 4 or 5 wellsare needed in the future and she asked Council to please be conservative and only plan what is real. The Administrator responded the 2005-2006 water projects are phased and will be supported by Well No. 2. Council member DeLapp noted there is no intention of changing zoning from what we are dealing with in the Comp Plan for super markets, etc. DeLapp added that the draft plan states that non-residential development would be split between retail space and office space. The City Planner explained that what Council member DeLapp was referring to was not under the land use section, but the traffic modeling table. B. Award Bid for Elevated Water Tower The City Engineer reported bids were received for the Elevated Tank No. 2 and recommended that the City accept the bid for a 750,000 gallon tank, composite (concrete based) style. He indicated the rationale for this recommendation is that the cost difference between the 50,000 gallon tank and the 750,000 gallon tank is actually very reasonable. Prew explained the extra gallons provide a safety buffer for when water use peaks in the summer and will accommodate future residents. Prew also recommended the concrete base because the cost difference between it and the steel base is $70,000. The cost to paint the exterior of the base is about $75,000. Considering the base would need to be repainted every 15 years, the cost savings over the life of the tank in painting would be enormous. The City Engineer recommended that three of the alternate bids be accepted. The first one is for the mezzanine which would house the telecommunication equipment. The second alternate is for additional paint colors, but the design of which is yet to be determined. The Final Alternate is to delete the below grade valve vault. An above grade heated room would be built inside the column to house the valves. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-114, A Resolution awarding the contract for Elevated Tank No. 2 to Chicago Bridge and Iron Constructors in the amount of $1,169,000.00 and accept Alternate Bid Items A4.1, A4.3, and A4.4. (Motion passed 5-0). 9. PLANNING, LAND USE AND ZONING: A. Shoreland Overlay Variance — 8148 Hill Trail. Fazzone The City Planner reported the Planning Commission recommended approval of this application for a variance from the OHW setback standard of the zoning ordinance. The applicant proposed to remodel and construct living area and garage (there is no garage at the present time) additions to this structure that was originally constructed decades ago, prior to the City adopting Shoreland standards. The existing structure is entirely located LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 within the 100 foot OHW setback, extending to within 37 feet of the OHW at the closest point. Most of the house and garage addition will be located within the OHW setback as well, but no additional encroachment, beyond the present 37 feet, will result from the proposal. The applicant said he would paint the house to be more subdued and blend it. M/S/P Johnson/Johnston - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-110, A Resolution Approving a variance from the Ordinary High Water setback standards of the zoning ordinance for James and Melissa Fazzone located at 8148 Hill Trail North per plans staff —dated October 6, 2005, as recommended b 7the Planning Commission. (Motion passed 5-0). B. Conditional Use Pelinit Amendment — Oakdale Gun Club The City Planner reported the Planning Commission unanimously recommended to approve the application to permit an addition to an existing equipment storage structure located near the center of the west 40 acres of the Gun Club property adjacent to 10th Street. The addition would increase the storage structure area from 290 square feet to 720 square feet. No modifications to the Gun Club operations would result from this amendment. M/S/P Smith/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-111, A Resolution Approving an Amendment to the Conditional Use Permit of the Oakdale Gun Club to permit an addition to an existing storage structure, as recommenced by the Planning Commission and per plans staff -dated October 7, 2005. (Motion passed 5-0). C. Final Plat and Development Agreement — Farms of Lake Elmo: The City Planner reported that the OP Preliminary Plat and Development Agreement for this 33 lot neighborhood were approved by the Council at the July 5, 2005 meeting. Subsequent to that action and upon the approval of the City Engineer of final infrastructure construction and grading plans (an issuance of the grading permit by the City and Valley Branch), the developer has proceeded with grading and pipe installation (at the developer's sole risk). A Development Agreement was prepared and the developer has submitted the Final Plat for approval. Attorney Filla indicated he just received the Declarations this evening and asked that in the Now Therefore paragraph in the Resolution, the following wording be added: subject to the review and approval of the development contract terms and declarations of easements and restrictions by the City Attorney prior to recording of documents. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnston — to include the requirement that the Minnesota Land Trust be offered easements for the Open Space. (Motion passed 5-0). Council member DeLapp pointed out the Council had received pictures of house types and he didn't want the developer to switch from what they received. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCII MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 6 M/S/P Smith/Johnson — to adopt Resolution No. 2005-112, A Resolution Approving the Final Plat and Development Agreement of Farms of Lake Elmo, as amended. to include in the Now Therefore paragraph the following: "subject to the review and approval of the development contract teinis and declarations of easements and restrictions by the City Attorney prior to recording of documents". (Motion passed 5-0). D. Highway 5 By -Pass Study The City Planner reported staff was contacted by the Deputy County Engineer to report that Washington County had been in touch with MnDOT and were advised that the MnDOT portion of the estimated study costs will not be available during 2006, nor in the foresable future. He said the County is requesting concurrence from the City for the County to re -appropriate the County's study cost share to County project purposes. The on -going Village Area Planning exercise by the City is still several weeks from conclusion and, at this point of the work it does not appear that the Highway by-pass concept is consistent with the consultant's direction on the Plan. City Staff recommended that the Administrator be authorized to advise the County that the City does not object to re -appropriation of the County's share of the by-pass study estimated costs in 2006, but such re -apportion be without prejudice to again addressing such a study at some later date. Mayor Johnston said he didn't like the way the study was presented because of the options provided and there was not support from the business community for the bypass. Council member DeLapp and Conlin indicated they wanted to proceed with the Old Village Plan. MJS/P DeLapp/Johnston— to terminate Lake Elmo's participation in the allocation of the re -appropriate Highway 5 by-pass study funds at this time. (Motion passed 5-0). E. Environmental Resources Mapping — Washington County Conservation District The City Planner reported on February 27, 2004 the Council approved a Letter of Endorsement for and clearly intended the City to contribute at least $7,500 toward a Conservation District project for land cover mapping of the City — finite identification of environmental features existing such as tree cover and wetlands. The balance of the mapping project costs (approx $7,500) were to come from a State LCMR grant. Unfortunately, the cuts to projects in the LCMR budget eliminated the match and the project did not materialize. The Planner explained the Conservation District has recently contacted City staff regarding re -starting the project, and whether the City continues to both support the project and continues to be willing to fund in a similar manner as in 2004. The matching funds would come from another source, perhaps not LCMR this time. The Planner advised the District that the Planning Department 2005 Comprehensive Planning budget LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIT , MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 7 line item is fully committed to the Plan amendment activities, and there is no similar line item appropriation in the 2006 budget. The Council Public Works Committee has reviewed this matter and acted to move forward with this project and provide the local match funding it will be necessary to either designate a portion of General Funds Surplus (for 2005) or add this expenditure to the Planning Department line item budget. M/S/P DeLapp/Smith — to provide support of $7,500 for finding of the Land Cover Mapping project proposed by the Washington County Conservation District. (Motion passed 5-0). 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Ordinance 97-163 Snowmobile Ordinance Modification The City Administrator explained the representative from the Snowmobile Club asked to postpone discussion until the November Council meeting. They have found other areas in the City which would be affected by the change that would protect residential properties and prohibit snowmobile/all-terrain operators from encroaching no closer than 50 feet from the residential structure on a 24/7/365 basis and wanted to talk to these property owners. B. Site for the South Fire Station: The City Administrator reported that he met with Lake Elmo Park Reserve officials seeking an agreement so the City could get access to two parcels of unused reserve land. The City was seeking alternative locations for a City Hall and new Fire Station. Rafferty said he wanted to get a feel for what the Council official thought about an idea to give to the City a triangular portion on the south side of Lake Elmo as well as a rectangle slice on non -connected reserve land across 10th Street. Rafferty said Jim Lugar and Commissioner Pulkrabek were not interested in that idea, but they did say it would consider a land swap if the City would turn over Sunfish Lake Park to the reserve's control in exchange for the property. Rafferty said he would take the idea to the Council on two conditions. First the residents of the City would have to have free access to Sunfish Lake Park in perpetuity and second, the City would have to receive a larger, more equal portion of land for the reserve. Rafferty said he approached the Council on the idea, but they were not in favor. He said as far as Sunfish Lake Park is concerned now; it is sacred ground to the City. Since there was no option to swap land with the reserve; he said he asked the Council if he could pursue an option of starting a joint powers agreement with the reserve which the Council approved. M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to authorize the Administrator to write a letter stating the City is interested in a joint powers agreement with Washington County for the possibility of building a fire station on a three acre parcel of land near the intersection of 10th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue in exchange for fire and rescue support in the Lake Elmo Regional Park, based on this would not jeopardize the reserve status of the park. (Motion passed 5- 0). The Council adjourns the meeting at 9:43 p.m. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Resolution No. 2005-108 Resolution No. 2005-109 Resolution No. 2005-110 Resolution No. 2005-111 storage structure Resolution No. 2005-112 Resolution No. 2005-113 Safety Resolution No. 2005-114 Iron Contractors Approve Claims Approve Stonegate Street Vacation Variance OHW, Fazzone, 8148 Hill Trail Amendment to CUP of Oakdale Gun Club for addition to Final Plat and Development Agreement of Farms of Lake Elmo Award Contract for purchase of Pumper/Tanker, General Award Contract for Elevated Tank No. 2, Chicago Bridge & LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES OCTOBER 18, 2005 9 LJIA CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-128 RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Numbers 292 through 295, DD573 through DD582, 28269 through 28308, were used for Staff Payroll dated November 23rd, 2005; claims 28309 through 28350, in the total amount of $448,493.39 are hereby approved. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean A. Johnston Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty City Administrator Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List User: administrator Printed: 11/30/2005 - 3:49 PM Invoice No Description Vendor:MNREVEN MN Department of Revenue Sales Tax 11/05 Sales Tax Nov 2005 Use Tax 11/05 Use Tax Nov 2005 Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total Number of Checks: AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:49 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 124.00 12/06/2005 101-410-1320-44300 5.00 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-44300 129.00 129.00 1 Reference ACH Enabled: No Page 1 Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List User: administrator Printed: 11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM Invoice No Description VendonAMFLAG American Flagpole & Flag 71796 Flags - City Hall Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 108.42 12/06/2005 108.42 Cheek Sequence: 1 101-410-1940-44040 Vendor:AMLEGAL American Legal Publishing Corp Check Sequence: 2 49425 2005 Adopted Ordinances 200.00 12/06/2005 101-410-1320-43510 Check Total: 200.00 Vendor: ARAM Aramark 629-5850995 Linen - City Hall Check Total: Vendor:ARAMAU ARAMARK 58994848-1 Winter Vest - Rick G. Check Total: 59.93 12/06/2005 59.93 149.78 12/06/2005 149.78 Check Sequence: 3 101-410-1940-44010 Check Sequence: 4 101-430-3100-44170 Vendor:BIFFS Biffs Inc. Check Sequence: 5 W276655 Rental, portable - Sunfish Lake Park 74.26 12/06/2005 101-450-5200-44120 Check Total: 74.26 Vendor:BRAUN Braun Intertec Corporation 255134 Concrete Testing, Proj. Mgmt - PW Check Total: 1,626.50 12/06/2005 1,626.50 Check Sequence: 6 410-480-8000-43030 Vendor:CENTURYB Century College Bookstore Check Sequence: 7 02-003856 Books - Fire Dept 208.80 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-44350 Check Total: 208.80 AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH EnabLed: No ACH Enabled: No Page 1 Invoice No Vendor:DIVCON 10-0266 Vendor: EMERGAPP 23710 23711 Vendor: EYECARE Malmquist Vendor:FXL December 2005 Vendor: GENESIS IVC00854 IVC00854 Vendor:GMCONTR 13186.000.003 Vendor: HACH 4498918 Vendor:HARDY 4861-4862 Vendor:HOLIDAY Lake Elmo Lake Elmo Lake Elmo Description Diversified Contracting Sol. New Public Works - Project 10-0266 Check Total: Emergency Apparatus Maint. Dry Service, Doors - 3173 Dry Service - 3183 Check Total: Eyecare Center Eyeglass lenses - Malinguist Check Total: FXL, Inc. Assessing Services - 12/2005 Check Total: Next Genesis Productions Monthy Maint. Agreement - 11/2005 Water Billing Computer Check Total: G.M. Contracting, Inc. Water Sys Phase II - Proj. 13186.000.003 Check Total: HACH Company Fluoride - Water Treatment Check Total: Linda Hardy Return Escrow for 4861, 4862 Check Total: Holiday Inn Lodging - MR - LMC Annual Lodging - CD - LMC Annual Lodging - Council - LMC Annual AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Check Sequence: 8 267,311.00 12/06/2005 410-480-8000-45200 267,311.00 424.42 12/06/2005 249.75 12/06/2005 674.17 Check Sequence: 9 101-420-2220-44040 101-420-2220-44040 Check Sequence: 10 141.78 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-43050 141.78 1,700.00 12/06/2005 1,700.00 900.00 12/06/2005 781.00 12/06/2005 1,681.00 Check Sequence: l I 101-410-1550-43100 Check Sequence: 12 101-410-1520-43180 601-494-9400-43180 Check Sequence: 13 24,900.63 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-46400 24,900.63 94.79 12/06/2005 94.79 2,000.00 12/06/2005 2,000.00 275.19 12/06/2005 275.19 12/06/2005 733.89 12/06/2005 Check Sequence: 14 601-494-9400-42160 Check Sequence: 15 803-000-0000-22900 Check Sequence: 16 101-410-1320-43310 101-410-1910-43310 101-410-1110-43310 Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 2 Invoice No Venclor:LIFESTYL Permit 4161 Vendor:MCLEOD 2799503 Vendor:MENARDST 9292 Vendor: METCOU 5086 Vendor:METROCA A0318076K Vendor:MNDOH 10/01-12/31/05 Vendor:MNLABOR Horning Vendor:Nall Wat 2950730 Vendor: NEXTEL 761950227-032 761950227-032 761950227-032 Description Check Total: Lifestyle Homes Permit 4161 Return for 4177 Kirkwood Ln Check Total: McLeod USA Telephone Service - Well 2 Check Total: Menards - Stillwater Push Brooms - Fire Dept. Check Total: Metropolitan Council Wastewater Charges - Sept -Nov Check Total: Metrocall Pagers - Fire Dept. Check Total: MN Departtnent of Health Water Supply Svce Conn. Fee Check 'Fotal: STATE TREASURER State Exam - Karl Homing Check Total: National Waterworks Manhole Cover Check Total: Nextel Communications Cellular Service - Admin Cellular Service - Fire Dept. Cellular Service - Bldg Dept. Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,284.27 Check Sequence: 17 1,000.00 12/06/2005 803-000-0000-22900 1,000.00 Check Sequence: 18 43.74 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-43210 43.74 Check Sequence: 19 21.92 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-42400 21.92 Check Sequence: 20 1,750.10 12/06/2005 602-495-9450-43820 1,750.10 80.94 12/06/2005 80.94 872.00 12/06/2005 872.00 Check Sequence: 21 101-420-2220-43210 Check Sequence: 22 601-494-9400-43820 Check Sequence: 23 70.00 12/06/2005 101-420-2400-44370 70.00 340.80 12/06/2005 340.80 80.31 12/06/2005 75.06 12/06/2005 33.10 12/06/2005 Check Sequence: 24 601-494-9400-42270 Check Sequence: 25 101-410-1940-43210 101-420-2220-43210 101-420-2400-43210 Reference ACH Enabled; No ACH Enabled; No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) Page 3 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 761950227-032 761950227-032 Cellular Service - Public Works Cellular Service - Parks Check Total: VendonNOSTPAUL City of North St Paul 200511220410 Sand/Salt Mix Check Total: Vendor:OFFICEMX 839919 873942 Vendor:ONECALL 5100521 Vendor: PETERSO 11135M 11140M 11145M 11150M 11155M 11161M Vendor:PioneerA 219071 Vendor:PRESS 11/14-11/28 Vendor: ROGERS 13176 13176 OfficeMax Printer Cartridges - Public Works Envelopes Check Total: Gopher State One-CallOne Call Concepts, Inc Line Locates - October 2005 Check Total: Peterson Fram & Bergman Admin Criminal Pros Public Imp. Proj. - Water Sys Community Dev Civil Litigation Auto Forfeiture Check Total: Pioneer Press Subscription Check Total: StevenPress Cablecasts - Planning Check Total: Rogers Printing Services Envelopes - Utility Billing Envelopes - Utility Billing Check Total: AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) 51.20 12/06/2005 16.55 12/06/2005 256.22 1,610.28 12/06/2005 1,610.28 108.58 12/06/2005 30.65 12/06/2005 139.23 116.85 12/06/2005 116.85 2,193.21 3,433.08 154.00 665.03 203.78 94.50 6,743.60 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 12/06/2005 104.00 12/06/2005 104.00 202.50 12/06/2005 202.50 342.93 12/06/2005 342.93 12/06/2005 685.86 101-430-3100-43210 101-450-5200-43210 Check Sequence: 26 101-430-3100-42290 Check Sequence: 27 101-430-3100-42000 101-410-1320-42000 Check Sequence: 28 101-430-3100-44300 Check Sequence: 29 101-410-1610-43040 101-410-1610-43045 410-480-8000-43040 803-490-9070-43040 101-410-1610-43040 101-410-1610-43045 Check Sequence: 30 101-410-1320-44330 Check Sequence: 31 101-410-1910-43620 Check Sequence: 32 601-494-9400-42000 603-496-9500-42000 ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Vendor:RUD DianePrince-Rud 11/14-11/30 Cleaning City Hall 11/14-11/30 Cleaning Fire Hall Check Total: Vendor:S&T S&T Office Products, Inc. 011(16019 Laminate 01KJ6019 DVDisks, Tapes 01KJ6084 Pens 0IKK0551 Laminate 0IKK9356 Schredder - Fire Dept 0IKK9356 Batteries/Charger' 01KK9425 Folders Check Total: Vendor; SATELLIT 24180628 Satellite Shelters, Inc. Bldg Dept Trailer Rental - November 05 Check Total: 360.00 12/06/2005 360.00 12/06/2005 720.00 Check Sequence: 33 101-410-1940-44010 101-420-2220-44010 Check Sequence: 34 16,24 12/06/2005 101-430-3100-42000 75.70 12/06/2005 101-410-1320-42000 5.34 12/06/2005 101-410-1320-42000 42.06 12/06/2005 101-430-3100-42000 73.80 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-42000 28.00 12/06/2005 101-410-1320-42000 14.36 12/06/2005 101-410-1520-42000 255.50 319.50 12/06/2005 319.50 Check Sequence: 35 101-420-2400-44120 Vendor:SCS Safety and Construction Supply Check Sequence: 36 80659 Signs, overlay kits - Fire Dept. 1,216.88 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-45800 Check Total: 1,216,88 Vendor: S herrn RobertSherman Check Sequence: 37 Claim 11/17 Reimb. for Fog Machines - Fire Dept 149.06 12/06/2005 101-420-2220-45800 Chcck Total: 149.06 Vendor: SPRINT Sprint 0526076025-3 Data Card - Fire Dept. Check Total: 51.18 12/06/2005 51.18 Check Sequence: 38 101-420-2220-43210 Vendor:STJOSEPH St Joseph Equipment, Inc. Check Sequence: 39 S142666 Fuel Filter 24.06 12/06/2005 101-420-2400-44040 SR14160 Bakhoe Rental - Nov 2005 213.00 12/06/2005 101-430-3100-43150 Check Total: 237,06 Venclor:TKDA TKDA, Inc. Check Sequence: 40 000200504419 Water Sys Phase I - V 13,191.16 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-43030 000200504420 Water Tank Design 12,667.64 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-43030 AP - Computer Check Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 5 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 000200504421 MSA Reporting and Meetings 333.35 12/06/2005 402-480-8000-43030 000200504421 Park CIP Review 230.32 12/06/2005 404-480-8000-43030 000200504421 Updates 77.36 12/06/2005 101-410-1910-43020 000200504421 Grading Rev,, Staff Mtgs., St. Vacations 8,300.74 12/06/2005 101-410-1930-43030 000200504421 Water System 3,403.34 12/06/2005 601-494-9400-43030 000200504421 Card.View,Tpstry, Farms, Sanc.,DG,Xing 19,668.37 12/06/2005 803-490-9070-43030 000200504422 Council Meetings Attendance 200.00 12/06/2005 101-410-1930-43030 000200504447 PW Design 992.75 12/06/2005 410-480-8000-43030 000200504450 2005 Hilltop Ave Repairs 11,428.66 12/06/2005 409-480-8000-43030 000200504451 Tablyn Pk Water Sys Connection 23,041.05 12/06/2005 '601-494-9400-43030 Check Total: 93,534.74 Vendor:UMCONTED U of M Continuing Education CCE Reg. tt177757 CCE Registration Fee - Jim McNamara CCE Reg.#177757 CCE Registration Fee - Karl Homing Check Total: Check Sequence: 41 85.00 12/06/2005 101-420-2400-44370 140.00 12/06/2005 101-420-2400-44370 225.00 Vendor:XCEL Xcel Energy Check Sequence: 42 49336544 3014 Jamley Ave 25.00 12/06/2005 101-430-3100-43810 49539836 2759 Legion Ave 12.08 12/06/2005 101-430-3100-43810 Check Total: 37.08 Total for Check Run: Total Number of Checks: AP - Computer Cheek Proof List (11/30/2005 - 3:53 PM) 412,999.37 42 ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 6 MONTH Jan Feb March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec 11135 11140 inistration Criminal Pros $4,443.11 $3,456.17 $2,439.99 $2,868.68 $3,375.41 $3,562.62 $1,979.81 $3,328.76 $3,779.92 $3,329.95 $3,795.88 $3,777.44 $3,690.32 $3,349.44 $2,602.10 $4,550.31 $1,178.61 $3,745.10 $2,193.21 $3,433.08 Totals $29,478.36 $35,401.55 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 2005 BILLING SUMMARY 11145 Public Imp. Proj $66.00 $544.36 $77.00 $297.00 $165.86 $121.00 $154.00 $1,425.22 11150 Community Dev $673.71 $198.00 $1,956.61 $2,753.61 $390.50 $363.00 $333.50 $352.00 $929.61 $665.03 $8,615.57 11155 Civil Litigation $210.00 $99.00 $954.77 $354.32 $1,261.00 $132.54 $865.07 $723.46 $203.78 $4,803.94 NNNNN N Ni 11161 Auto Forfeiture $464.00 $94.50 $318.50 $307.00 $518.00 $40.50 $40.50 $590.61 $1,508.50 $94.50 $3,976.61 TOTAL $9,312.99 $6,145.53 $9,312.14 $9,400.95 $8,669.69 $9,403.68 $7,546.30 $8,960.09 $8,206.28 $6,743.60 $0.00 $0.00 $83,701.25 11/16/2005 Aite 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 upon ***ma mit*****•144goas r000 FRAIVI BE" ROMAN CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LaveLile Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 ACCOUNT NO. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11135M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11135-050003 3M - TOWER/PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING SITE DONATION 33.00 0.00 0.00 $33.00 11135-050006 STONEGATE STREET VACATIONS 198.00 0.00 0.00 $198.00 11135-050008 HEARTH EASEMENT ENCROACHMENT 121.00 0.00 0.00 $121.00 11135-920001 Administration 1,841.00 0.21 0.00 $1,841.21 2,193.00 0.21 0.00 $2,193.21 MS STATEMENT IS DU E AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDlitD TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Fifth Street East St. Pau!, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 ACCOUNT NO. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 441-0991098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11140M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11140-030001 Misc Prosecutions 3,045.00 22.58 0.00 $3,067.58 11140-030030 Garavalia, Timothy Sr. Driving after suspension 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-040281 Wukawitz, Timothy John violate harassment order 10.00 0.00 44.00 $54.00 11140-050060 Classen, Michael James 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .10 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 '11140-050066 Gallmeier, Ryan Lee 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .10 30.00 0.00 0.00 $30.00 11140-050068 Kleinvachter, Robert M. 2nd degree DUI, test refusal 75.00 0.00 0.00 $75.00 11140-050105 Batchelor, Robyn Lynn DAR 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050138 Guplen, Julia Kyeong liable for crimes of another 22.50 0.00 0.00 $22.50 THIS STATEMENT IS DOE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF I kilt MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER rtm LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO 'HI. NEXT MON'TIVS STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. _-300 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO FEES EXPENSES 11140-050141 Lee, Dasvis terroristic threats 0.00 0.00 11140-050174 Staffoed, David Levon solicit without a permit 10.00 0.00 11140-050217 Skogland, Jon Michael 2nd degree DUI, 2nd degree .08 37.00 0.00 11140-050219 Dworak. Krista Noelle Speed, no proof of insurance 5.00 0.00 11140-050220 Cameron, Michael Eugene GM-DAC-IPS, 4th degree DUI, speed 10.00 0.00 11140-050222 Mancheski, Kevin J. 2nd degree DUI, DAR, no insurance 10.00 11140-050223 Driscoll, Corrine K. GM -obstruction 11140-050231 Kershaw, Geraldine 4th degree DUI 11140-050232 Peltier, Mark Alan GM-DAC-IPS 0.00 10.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 10.00 0.00 3,294.50 22.58 ACCOUNT NO_ (.651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 041-0991098 Page: 2 10/31/2005 11140M ADVANCES BALANCE 72.00 $72.00 0.00 $10.00 0.00 $37.00 0.00 $5.00 o.00 $10.00 0.00 $10.00 0.00 $10.00 0.00 $5.00 0.00 $10.00 116.00 $3,433.08 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MON 1 STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE 'RIM° 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 ERSON, C7BERGMAN ACCOUNT NO. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11145M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11145-040003 WATER SYSTEMS CONNECTION 55.00 0.00 0.00 $55.00 11145-050001 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 99.00 0.00 0.00 $99.00 154.00 0.00 0.00 $154.00 TES STATEMENT IS DOE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF n rut mown WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. „Ice 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paui, 1V1N 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 BERGMAN Atto4itszip.itositittOltillie ACCOUNT NO. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax flj #41-099 !098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11150M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11150-030005 PRAIRIE RIDGE OFFICE PARK PUD 44.00 0.00 0.00 $44.00 11150-040005 LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH - REZONING - SUP 44.00 0.00 0.00 $44.00 11150-040019 CARDINAL VIEW - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN, REZONING 77.00 0.00 •0.00 $77.00 11150-050004 FARMS OF LAKE ELMO 0.P. DEVELOPMENT 363.00 3.21 0.00 $366.21 11150-990006 Carriage Homes Development 132.00 1.82 0.00 $133.82 660.00 5.03 0.00 $665.03 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. _fie 300 50 Fifth Street East St. faul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 ACCOUNT NO. (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 Facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-099I098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11155M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE' 11155-040002 ZIERTMAN/SESSING PROPERTY 202.50 1.28 0.00 $203.78 THIS STATEMENTIS DEMAND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTR. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTRWILLIME CREDITED TO THE NEXTMONTR'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. ce 300 50 Fifth Street East St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 ACCOUNT NO. FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11161-050001 Brame, angela vehicle forf u e-2005 Escalade 54.00 0.00 0.00 11161-050007 Skoglund, Jon Michael vehicle forfeiture 40.50 0.00 0.00 94.50 0.00 (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 10/31/2005 11161M BALANCE $54.00 $40.50 0.00 $94.50 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTIFFS STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Lake Elmo City Council December 06, 2005 Agenda Section: Consent No. 4B Agenda Item: League of Minnesota Cities — Waiver of Monetary Limits on Tort Liability The City of Lake Elmo obtains liability coverage through the League of Minnesota Cities Insurance trust for buildings and vehicles. The coverage also covers tort liability. Because of this coverage, the City must decide whether or not to waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability as established by Minnesota Statutes §466.04. If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant would be able to recover no more than $300,000 on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,000. These statutory tort limits would apply regardless of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. If the city waives the statutory tort limits, and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000 on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000, regardless of the number of claimants. Historically, the City has elected not to waive the tort limit and staff recommends the City to adopt a resolution stating that the City does not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability as established under Minnesota Statutes §466.04. Action Items: Person responsible: 1 Adopt Resolution # 2005-130 City of Lake Elmo does not T. Bouthilet waive the monetary limits on, municipal tort liability. Attachments: Time Allocated: Resolution # 2005-130 None League of MN Cities Waiver Form CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MNTh4ESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-130 RESOLUTION REGARDING TORT LIABILITY NON -WAIVER OF MONETARY LIMITS WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo obtains its liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities; WHEREAS, as part of the renewal process, the City must decide whether or not to waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability as established under Minnesota Statutes §466.04; WHEREAS, the City Council has reviewed the options to waive the coverage, purchase excess liability coverage and decide not to waive the monetary limits; NOW, THEREFORE, The City Council shall not waive the monetary limits on municipal tort liability under Minnesota Statutes §466.04. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on December 06, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator LEAGUE OF MINNESOTA CITIES INSURANCE TRUST LIABILITY COVERAGE -WAIVER FORM Cities obtaining liability coverage from the League of Minnesota Cites Insurance Trust must decide whether or not to waive the statutory tort liability limits to the extent of the coverage purchased. The decision to waive or not to waive the statutory limits has the following effects: • If the city does not waive the statutory tort limits, an individual claimant Would be able to recover no more than $300,000.on any claim to which the statutory tort limits apply. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would be limited to $1,000,00p. These statutory tort limits would apply regard(ess of whether or not the city purchases the optional excess liability coverage. • If the city waives the statutory tort limits and does not purchase excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover up to $1,000,000. on a single occurrence. The total which all claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to $1,000,000., regardless of the number of claimants. If the city waives the statutory tort limits and purchases excess liability coverage, a single claimant could potentially recover an amount up to the limit of the coverage purchased. The total which all• claimants would be able to recover for a single occurrence to which the statutory tort limits apply would also be limited to the amount of coverage purchased, regardless of the number of claimants; Claims to which the statutory municipal tort limits do not apply are not affected bythis decision. This decision must be made by the city council. Cities purchasing coverage must complete and return this form to LMCIT before the effective date of the coverage. For further information, contact LMCIT. You may also wish to discuss these issues -with-yoUr city attorney. accepts liability coverage limits of $ from he League of Minnesota Cities Insurance Trust (LMCIT). Check one: The city DOES NOT WAIVE the monetary limits on municipal tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466.04. • E The city WAIVES the monetary limits on tort liability established by Minnesota Statutes 466..04, to the extent of the limits of the liability coverage obtained from LMCIT. Date of city council meeting Signature/Date Position Return this completed form to LMC2T, 145 University Ave. W., St. Paul, MN. 55103-2044 LMCIT (11/00)(Rev.11/03) Page, 1 of Lake Elmo City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Section: CONSENT AGENDA NO. 4C. Agenda Item: 2006 LIQUOR LICENSES Backzround Information for December 6, 2005: Twin Point Tavern, Lake Elmo Inn, Tartan Park, Machine Shed Restaurant have submitted their renewal liquor applications, required fees and insurance certificates. As of this date, the City has not received approval from the Washington County Sheriff's Dept. Therefore, the following motions are offered for your approval. Joe Bush has informed the City he purchased the Lake Elmo Banquet Hall and will be applying for a liquor license. Action items: Motion , Second to grant a 2006 On -Sale intoxicating liquor and On -Sale Sunday intoxicating license to 3M Club of St. Paul (Operators of Tartan Park) and to the Machine Shed Restaurant by Heart of America Restaurants and Inn; conditioned on approval by the Washington County Sheriff's Dept.. Motion , Second to grant a 2006 On -Sale intoxicating liquor, Off -Sale intoxicating liquor, and On -Sale Sunday intoxicating liquor license to the Twin Point Tavern and Lake Elmo Inn; conditioned on approval by the Washington County Sheriffs Dept. Person responsible: S. Lumby Attachments: Time Allocated: Liquor License Renewal Applications Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133 St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 651-296-6979 • TTY 651-282-6555 • Fax 651-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES %C.;,f1•7A:;R4,r "r'" 6iiiii-eartitl'**04141111iit ,'••••'',•4•A ."'""•• • •91%•••,' ' 4 ' -,P704T47ed 004 "TiMati4030,WfigPg 0,f° gipteikral Licensee; Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code City/County where license approved. Licensee Name Trade Name CMBS License Period Ending laHe 1,LIMO Lake Elmo iflfl Inc. Lake Elmo Inn Licensed Location address City, State, Zip Code Business Phone 12/31/2/Deibt 3442 Lake Elmo Ay N/PO Box 'Imo, MN 55042 /777-8495 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ '200. 1500. 01/1 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. . City for the new license Annlirant's sienatnre on this renewal confirms the followine: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee cou&ms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 34DA.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- ity. (3.2% liquor licenses are exempt if sales are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). A•xv, c)- - Licensee Signature L. Date /7 ( — (Signature certifies all above information to be correct and 1i<nseh been approved by city/county.) City Cleric/County Auditor Signpmie Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Sionature Date County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is ehgible for license) Police/Sheriff Si Loature Dare (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093-98 d5 0214 FAX 21 0 02 Commercial Certificate of Insurance AgencY Name Address St. 13 Insured Nam Address . Frank Andreatti Agency • 1971 Geneva Ave N • Oakdale, 1Vin 55128 Agent 347 . Lake Elmo Inn Inc • 3442 Lake Elmo Ave N • Lake Elmo Mn 55042 • Issue Date (WINVIDD/11) FARMERS- 11/18/2005 This certificate is issued as a matter of information only and confers no rights upon the certificate holder. This certificate does not amend, extend or alter the coverage afforded by the policies shown below. Companies Providing Coverage Company A Truck insurance Exchange Jzonr Company B Farmers Insurance Exchange Laser Company C Wild -Century Insurance Company Lattlf Company D utter Coverages This is to certify that the policies of insurance listed below have been issued to the Insured named above for the policy period indicated. Notwithstanding any requirement, term or condition or ony contract or other document with respect to which this certificate may be issued or may pertain, the insurance afforded by the policies described herein is subject to all the terms. exclusions and conditions of such polities. Limits shown may have been reduced by paid claims. Co. Type of Insurance Ltr. General Liability COMIllartied General Liability - Occurrence Version Contactual - Incidental Only Owners & Contractors Prot Automobile Liability g All Owned Commercial Autos X Scheduled AVMS X Hired Autos X Non -Owned Autos Garage Liability ax Umbrella Liability x WorkersCompensation arid Employers' Liability Description of OperationsiVehiclestrictionsiSpecial items; General liability policy includes liquor liability coverage of $1000,000 plus $1000,000 coverage under liability umbrella Policy Number 60122-53-46 Policy Effective Policy Expiration Date Nnvtinnird Date NM/DIJNY) 01/01/2006 12/31/2006 60122-53-46 01/01/2006 12131/2006 Policy Limits General Aggregate Products-Comp/OPS Aggregate Personal & Advertising Injury Each Occurrence Fire Damage (Any one fire) Medical Expense (Any one person) Combined 5thgI Limit Bodily injury Person) Certificate Holder Name SZ Address 4a4 • City Of Lake Elmo • 3 SOO Laverne Ave N • Lake Elrno, Mn 55042 60215-55-35 N2220-85-37 01/01/2006 01/01/2006 12/31/2006 12/31/2006 Limit $ 2000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 2,000,000 $ 1,000,000 $ 75,000 s 5,000 $ 1,000,000 $ $ ,Goo,000 Statutory Each Accident 8' 500,000 Disease - Each Employee s 500,000 Disease Policy Limit 1 500,000 Cancellation should any of the above described polities be cancelled before the expiration date thereof, the issiting company will endeavor to mail 30 days written notice to the certificate holder named to the left, but failure to mall such notice shall impose no obligation or liability of any lint! upon tbe company, it agents or representatives Authorized Representative Copy Distribution: Service Center Copy and Agent's Copy 1401 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133 St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 651-296-6979 • 11Y 651-282-6555 Fax 651-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES vogewiriag vgPxWNolicens,e*abevzprovedioroieasitt&untilOVOY , Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A-404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code City/County where license approved.. D. T. LaCroix Enterprises Inc Licensee Name Trade Name Twin Point Tavern Licensed Location address *11199 Stillwater Blv, CMBS Period Endine City, State, Zip Code Business Phone La k e Elmo, MN 55042 • 777-0239 12/ 7.1 2/1.11311) LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ 200. 00 1500. 00 20o. oo By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to renort any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 1 Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a 11 where license is issu ity. (3.2% liquor li Licensee Sinat liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- pt if s $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). 0.Z) Date d z-z (SigriPture certis all above informationto be6orrect and license has been approved by city/county.) City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney. iaturf.. Date County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license), Police/Sheriff Signature Date (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cit (criminalicivil). Report violations on back, then sign here. during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations PS 9093-98 CERTIFICATE OF LIABI TY INSURANCE DATE (MM/DD/YYYY) 10/31/2005 (651)644-0311 FAX (651)641-8981 ,.xlet/Slater, Inc. 2610 University Ave., #200 St. Paul, MN 55114 INSURED Twin Point Tavern D T Lacroix Enterprises Inc Dba P.Q. Box 902 Lake Elmo, MN 55042-9501 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: INSURER B: I INSURER C: I INSURER D: I INSURER E: Everest National NAIC # COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADD'U J,TR 'NSRC TYPE OF INSURANCE GENERAL LIABILITY COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY A CLAIMS MADE OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES P I POLICY RO- ( I LC JECT AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY ANY AUTO EXCESS/UMBRELLA UABILITY C OCCUR CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTWE OFFICER/MEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes, describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below OTHER Liquor Liability POUCY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION DATE IMMIDDJYY) DATE (MMIDTVY" LIMITS EACH OCCURRENCE $ DAMAGE TO RENTED PRFMISFS (Fa nm:r.(1rp) MED EXP (My one person) PERSONAL & ADV INJURY $ $ GENERAL AGGREGATE $ PRODUCTS-COMP/OP AGO 5 COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGG $ IEACH OCCURRENCE IAGGREGATE TATU- 0 E.L. EACH ACCIDENT $ E.L. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ RENEWAL OF UM0003519 01/01/2006 01/01/2007 *See Below DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES / EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT / SPECIAL PROVISIONS $50,000 BI Ea Person, $100,000 BI Ea Common Cause, $10,000 PD Ea Common Cause, $50,000 Loss of Means of Support Ea Person, 5100,000 Loss of Means of Support Ea Common Cause, $300,000 Annual Aggregate CERTIFICATE HOLDER City of Lake Elmo 3880 Laverne Ave N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 10 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO MAIL SUCH NOTICE SHALL IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES. AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ACORD 25 (2001108) FAX: (651) 777-9615 Jeffrey Stanley/AML ©ACORD CORPORATION 1988 ,Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133 St, Paul, MN 55101-5133 651-296-6979 • TTY 651-282-6555 • Fax 651-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES Tq icense wj,1 appr ,,,erFeleas ti Ahet'S t),Retat eolprFard .„1VIN • 'Agyi ot*14 ig011,143t6..7. -weaumaft,A4 $,exemptpoK,N, 4r- ,;•:EVIVP''''g, AMNOTA4V,0 rAir.41.1rge5,4AiRAAhf,t: „ Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new ,license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. 01\193 License Code City/County where license approved. i Paul Inc. Licensee Name Trade Name TartP an ark Resturar Licensed Location address 1145 20t h N City, State, Zip Code Business Phone , . License Period Ending tiq Lake Elmo MN 55042 12/ /200TD 2761 E1 /737-0773 LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ 0 - 00 1500. 00 2-00. 00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further 'information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issued. $100,000 in casb or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- ity. (3.2% liquor lice are less than $23,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). I ,C).Z Linens Si_ a /42..X Date 74/45 (Signature certifies all abov Wlircerrise has been approved by city/county.) ' City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) Comity Attorney Signature Date, County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Police/Sheriff Signature Date (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criininslicivil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093-98 Class "A" Directors Connie Bannie Don Hoffman Nora Ivory Joan Johnson Dianne Olson Glenn Ritzer Jan Schlueter Mary Shafer Darlene Smith Deb Wright 3M Club of St Paul, c. Directors, Officers 185 Richmond, St. Paul, 55102 222-4919 IT Applications — 224-3S-25 736-2028 2123 East Geranium Ave., St. Paul, 55119 651-735-4985 Drug Delivery Systems — 260-3A-05 575-8165 Credit/Finance — 224-5N-41 575-1655 Medical — 275-5E-01 737-2365 TDD — 260-3A-06 575-3454 It Administrative Services — 224-4S-19 736-8644 Automotive/Transportation — 001-1-1 Stillwater 733-0298 Pharmaceuticals — 260-4A-04 737-3420 Officers Kristin Hagberg Reg. Affairs — Pharm — 270-3S-08 — President 736-0527 Tom Bulen Pharm. Division— 275-6W-13 — Vice President 736-5700 Jacquie Register AMO-223-2W-15 - Secretary 733-5989 James Olson IT Acquisitions — 224-5W-19 - Treasurer 733-1310 ACOR©, CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE page 1 of 2 PRODUCER INSURED Willis of Minnesota, Inc. 4D00 Olson Memorial Ewy. Suite 300 Minneapolis, MN 55422 3M Company 3M Insurance Department Bldg 224-5S-29 St. Paul, MN 55144 763-302-7100 DATE 10/31/2005 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE NAJC# INSURER A: Old Republic Insurance Company 24147-001 INSURER B: INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E: COVERAGES THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED_ NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS. INSR ADD'L LTR INSRE TYPE OF INSURANCE A GENERAL UABILITY R COMMEROALGENERALLIABILITY POLICY NUMBER POLICY EFFECTIVE DATE IMM/DD/YY) POLICY EXPIRATION DATE (MIDDIYY1 LIMITS MWZY 55636 3/1/2005 12/31/2005 EACH OCCURRENCE DAMAGE TO RENTED PREMISES (Ea occurence) CLAIMS MADE X OCCUR MED EXP (Any one person) X Liauor Liability X (see below) GEN'LAGGREGATE LIMIT I POLICY I 1 JE C AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY ANY AUTO ALL OWN ED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS NON -OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LLABILITY ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY I OCCUR P PER: LOC CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION S WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS' LIABILITY ANY PROPRIETOR/PARTNER/EXECUTIVE OFFICERMIEMBER EXCLUDED? If yes describe under SPECIAL PROVISIONS below OTHER PERSONAL a. ADV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS• COMP/OP AG COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) BODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT OTHER THAN AUTO ONLY: EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE TORWC STATU- Y LIMITS E.L EACH ACCIDENT EA ACC AGG $ $ 5 5 OTH- ER 5 E.L DISEASE - EA EMPLOYEE E.L. DISEASE - POLICY UMIT I $ DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONS/VEHICLES/EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Liquor Liability coverage under policy number MWZY 55636 effective 1-1-2006 to 12-31-2006 Limits $50,000 bodily injury $100,000 property damage. $10,000/50,000/100,000 Loss of Means of Support. CERTIFICATE HOLDER City of Lake Elmo x Lake Elmo, MN 55042 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL. IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTAT AU ENTATIVE ACORD25(2001/08) Co11:1447662 Tp1:429808 Ce`rt`:6418763 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 Minnesota Department of Public Safety Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement 444 Cedar Street, Suite 133 St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 651-296-6979 • TTY 651-282-6555 • Fax 651-297-5259 RENEWAL OF LIQUOR, WINE, CLUB OR 3.2% LICENSES igag4iwzopougigr;..gjrliwgaizgiggmgswagg,-,go;vkafpgaggfwirqitezN%:g-gwu Licensee: Please verify your license information contained below. Make corrections if necessary and sign. City Clerk/County Auditor should submit this signed renewal with completed license and licensee liquor liability for the new license period. City Clerk/County Auditor are also required by M.S. 340A.404 S. 3 to report any license cancellation. License Code City/County where license approved. Licensee Name Trade Name Moline. Plow I !1inne Licensed Location address City, State, Zip Code Business Phone Lic,else Period t. it=kchine *8515 Hudson Blvd Lk e Elmo 12/31/2007b# 9M94 /73'7-743i; LICENSE FEES: Off Sale $ On Sale $ Sunday $ 152MIZuZ 200. 00 By signing this renewal application, applicant certifies that there has been no change in ownership on the above named licensee. For changes in ownership, the licensee named above, or for new licensees, full applications should be used. See back of this application for further information needed to complete this renewal. Applicant's signature on this renewal confirms the following: Failure to report any of the following will result in fines. 1. Licensee confirms it has no interest whatsoever, directly or indirectly in any other liquor establishments in Minnesota. If so, give details on back of this application. 2. Licensee confirms that it has never had a liquor license rejected by any city/township/county in the state of Minnesota. If ever rejected, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 3. Licensee confirms that for the past five years it has not had a liquor license revoked for any liquor law violation (state or local). If a revocation has occurred, please give details on the back of this renewal, then sign below. 4. Licensee confirms that during the past five years it or its employees have not been cited for any civil or criminal liquor law violations. If violations have occurred, please give details on back of this renewal, then sign below. 5. Licensee confirms that during the past license year, a summons has not been issued under the Liquor Liability Law (Dram Shop) MS 340A.802. If yes, attach a copy of the summons, then sign below. 6. Licensee confirms that Workers Compensation insurance is in effect for the full license period. Licensee has attached a liquor liability insurance certificate that corresponds with the license period in city/county where license is issue $100,000 in cash or securities or $100,000 surety bond may be submitted in lieu of liquor liabil- ity. (3.2% liquor 1icyfis arefreinpfrJes are less than $25,000 at on sale, or $50,000 at off sale). r.) - Dare -4071/1....S..— C125 7 ••• tg oi license has been approved by city/county.) Licensee S' a (Signature certifi City Clerk/County Auditor Signature Date (Signature certifies that renewal of a liquor, wine or club license has been approved by the city/county as stated above.) County Attorney Sig -nature County Board issued licenses only (Signature certifies licensee is eligible for license). Police/SherificSignature Date Date (Signature certifies licensee or associates have not been cited during the past five years for any state/local liquor law violations (criminal/civil). Report violations on back, then sign here. PS 9093-98 ACORD„. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE 11/15/05 DATE IMM/DO/YY) PRODUCER THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION Holmes Murphy & ADGOC - WDM ONLY AND CONFERS, NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AMEND, EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. P.O. Box 9207 Des MOines, IA 50306-9207 INSURED Moline Plow L.L.C. dba Minnesota Machine Shed 1944 Brannan Road Ext., Moline, ILJ 61265 COVERAGES 1-800-247-7756 INSURERS AFFORDING COVERAGE INSURER A: Markel American Insurance Company INSURER INSURER C: INSURER D: INSURER E THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REQUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR OTHER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS, EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. AGGREGATE LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID qualms. INSR POLICY EFFECTIVE POLICY EXPIRATION _LTR TYPE OF INSURANCE POLICY NUMBER nATP ImmfoLyYTI DATE IMM/Dn'YYN GENERAI LIABILITY EACH OCCURRENCE COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY CLAIMS MADE I OCCUR GEN'L AGGREGATE LIMIT PRO - POLICY JECT AUTOMOBILE LIABIUTY ANY AUTO ALL OWNED AUTOS SCHEDULED AUTOS HIRED AUTOS • NON -OWNED AUTOS GARAGE LIABILITY _I ANY AUTO EXCESS LIABILITY OCCUR 7 PLIES PER: LOC CLAIMS MADE DEDUCTIBLE RETENTION $ WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERSLIABILITY OTHER A Liquor Liability 8321RE002382-4 FIRE DAMAGE {Any one fire) MED EXP (Any one person) PERSONAL & AOV INJURY GENERAL AGGREGATE PRODUCTS - COMP/OF' AG COMBINED SINGLE LIMIT (Ea accident) BODILY INJURY (Per person) EODILY INJURY (Per accident) PROPERTY DAMAGE (Per accident) LIMITS 5 5 AUTO ONLY - EA ACCIDENT $ OTHER THAN EA ACC $ AUTO ONLY: AGO $ EACH OCCURRENCE AGGREGATE 5 11-OTH- 1/YLIMW:S1 FR EL. EACH ACCIDENT $ EL. DISEASE - EA EMPLOYE $ E.L. DISEASE - POLICY LIMIT $ 01/01/06 12/31/06 L»4 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS/LOCATIONSIVEHICLE&EXCLUSIONS ADDED BY ENDORSEMENT/SPECIAL PROVISIONS Re: 8515 Hudson Boulevard Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Above mentioned. Liquor Policy covers all catered events at any location. CERTIFICATE HOLDER I ADDITIONAL. INSURED; INSURER LErrER: State of Minnesota- Alcohol & Gambling Enforcement Division 444 Cedar Street Ste. 133 St. Paul, MN 55101-5133 USA ACORD 25-S (7197) jevariswaErm 3 63272 8 CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OF THE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, THE ISSUING INSURER WILL ENDEAVOR TO MAIL 30 DAYS WRITTEN NOTICE TO THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER NAMED TO THE LEFT, BUT FAILURE TO DO SO SHALL. IMPOSE NO OBLIGATION OR LIABILITY OF ANY KIND UPON THE INSURER, ITS AGENTS OR REPRESENTATIVES, pAUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE 0 ACORD CORPORATION 1988 - - Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CONSENT AGENDA No 4D. City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Item: Partial Payment for Hilltop Avenue Background Information for December 6. 2005: The City Engineer reported that Tower Asphalt has completed the 2005 Street Repairs -Hilltop Avenue. The only work remaining is to make sure the grass seed comes up in the spring. The City Engineer recommends approval of Partial Payment No. 1 in the amount of $115,822.71. Action Items: Motion: , Second , to adopt Resolution No. 2005- 129, A Resolution Approving Partial Payment to Tower Asphalt in the amount of $115,822.71 for work completed on 2005- Street Repairs — Hilltop Avenue, as verified by the City Engineer in his memo dated December 1, 2005. Attachments: Letter from Tom Prew dated December 1, 2005 Resolution 2005-129 Person responsible: T.Prew TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS PLANNERS December 1, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Partial Payment No. 1 Hilltop Trail City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota TKDA Project No. 13403.000 Dear Mayor and City Council: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Work is complete for 2005 on this project. The only work remaining is to make sure the grass seed comes up in the spring. City Council Action Requested Approve Partial Payment No. 1 Sincerely, Thomas D. Prew, P.E. City Engineer TDP:art An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity ... ADA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS 1500 Piper Jaftrdy Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 2.92-0083 Fax www.ada.corn Proj. No. 13403.000 Cert. No. 1 St. Paul, MN, November 28 .20 05 To City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Owner This Certifies that Tower Asphalt, Inc. , Contractor For 2005 Street Repairs Is entitled to One Hundred Fifteen Thousand EihtHundred Twenty Two Dollars and 96/100----($ 115,822.71 ) being 1st estimate for partial payment on contract with you dated September 20 2005 Received payment in full of above Certificate. TKDA Tower Asphalt, Inc. , 20 Thomas D. Prew, P.E. RECAPITULATION OF ACCOUNT CONTRACT PLUS EXTRAS PAYMENTS CREDITS Contract price plus extras 117,249.40 All previous payments Allprevious credits Extra No. Credit No. el 4/ It f f It et AMOUNT OF THIS CERTIFICATE Totals Credit Balance There will remain unpaid on contract after payment of this Certificate $ 115,822.71 117,249.40 $ 115,822.71 1,426.69 117,249.40 $ 117,249.40 V $ An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TKDA Engineers -Architects -Planners Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101 PERIODICAL ESTIMATE FOR PARTIAL PAYMENTS Estimate No. 1 Period Ending. November 23 . 20 05 Page 1 of 1 Proj. No. 13403.000 Contractor Tower Asphalt Inc. Original Contract Amount S117.249.40 Project City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Location Hilltop Avenue Total Contract Work Completed 121,918.64 Total Approved Credits 0.00 Total Approved Extra Work Completed 0.00 Approved Extra Orders Amount Completed 0.00 Total Amount Earned This Estimate 121,918.64 Less Approved Credits $ 0.00 Less 5 % Retained $ 6,095.93 Less Previous Payments $ 0.00 Total Deductions $ Amount Due This Estimate Contractor Engineer Tower Asphalt Thomas D. Prew, P.E. 6,095.93 115,822.71 Date Date November 29. 2005 PERIOD ENDING: November 23, 2005 2005 STREET REPAIRS HILLTOP AVENUE CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13403.000 ITEM CONTRACT QUANTITY UNIT AMOUNT NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY TO DATE PRICE TO DATE HILLTOP AVENUE 1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 16,400.00 $ 16,400.00 2 RECLAIM BITUMINOUS SURFACE SY 10,600.0 9,943.0 $ 0.67 $ 6,661.81 3 REPAIR CATCH BASIN EA 6.0 4.0 $ 290.00 $ 1,160.00 4 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION CY 1,000.0 1,248.0 $ 1,00 $ 1,248.00 5 GRADE GRAVEL BASE RS 28,0 28.0 $ 255.00 $ 7,140.00 6 BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE TN 960.0 1,160.0 $ 33.84 $ 39,254.40 7 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE TN 900.0 955.76 $ 34.84 $ 33,298.68 8 TACK COAT GAL 500.0 375.0 $ 1.00 $ 375.00 9 BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY PATCHING SY 50.0 $ 30.00 $ 10 SAW AND SEAL PAVEMENT LF 2,400.0 2,089.0 $ 1.75 $ 3,655.75 11 LAWN RESTORATION LS 1.0 1.0 $ 7,225.00 $ 7,225.00 SUBTOTAL BASE BID - $ 116,418.64 PART II 1 REPLACE CATCH BASIN ON 32ND STREET LS 1.0 1.0 $ 5,500.00 $ 5,500.00 2 REMOVE AND REPLACE CONCRETE CURB AND GUTTER ON IRONWOOD TRAIL NORTH LF 20.0 - $ 55.00 $ - SUBTOTAL PART II $ 5,500.00 TOTAL ESTIMATE NO. 1 $ 121,918.64 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, IVIINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-129 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PARTIAL PAYMENT NO. 1 TO TOWER ASPHALT FOR THE 2005 STREET REPAIRS — HILLTOP AVENUE PROJECT BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby approves Partial Payment No. 1 to Tower Asphalt in the amount of Si for work completed on the 2005 Street Repairs — Hilltop Avenue Project, verified by the City Engineer in his memo dated December 1, 2005. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Lake Elmo City Council 12-06-2005 Agenda Section: CONSENT AGENDA Agenda Item: Workers' Compensation for Elected Officials Background Information for December 06, 2005: No . 4E Minnesota Statue 176.001 subd.9, (5) provides that "municipal officers elected or appointed for a regular term of office" are considered to be "employees" for workers' compensation purposes only if the city has passed as ordinance or resolution to that effect. This would provide coverage for elected officials injured while performing his or her duties. Attached, please find Resolution 2005-140 Workers' Compensation for Elected Officials for your consideration. Please note this resolution must be adopted in order to provide the Mayor & Council Worker's Compensation Coverage. Action Items: Adopt Resolution 2005-140 Workers' Person responsible: Compensation Coverage for Elected Officials Tom Bouthilet Attachments: 1. Resolution. 2005-140 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNBSOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-140 RESOLUTION REGARDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION COVERAGE FOR ELECTED OFFICIALS WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo obtains its Worker's Compensation coverage from the League of Minnesota Cities; WHEREAS, M.S. 176.011, subd. 9, (5) provides "that municipals officers elected or appointed for a regular term of office" are considered to be "employees" for workers compensation purposes only if the city has passed an ordinance or resolution to that effect; WHEREAS, as part of the renewal process, the City must decide whether or not the Mayor & Council intent is that they will be included as employees for workers compensation purposes only; NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED , The Mayor & Council Members of the CITY OF LAKE ELMO be covered by the Minnesota Workers' Compensation. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on December 06, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Lake Elmo Agenda Section: FINANCE N .5A & B City Council 12-06-2005 Agenda Item: Adoption of Final 2006 Budget and Levy Background Information for December 06, 2005: Attached, Please find two Resolutions for Adoption of the Final 2006 Budget and Levy. The City conducted several workshops and a Truth n'Taxation Public Hearing to receive input in the preparation and completion of the 2006 Budget. The 2006 proposed tax rate remains the same as 2005 and reflects an 11.74% increase in the Levy which is attributed to an increase in property valuations. Future development related fees accounts for 88% of the total increase in revenue. The Revenue increase will fund additional staff positions, capital Expenditures, development related activities as well as notable increases in Legal , Law Enforcement, Fire, Public Works, Utilities and Fuel accounts. Staff continues to address shoitfalls in Fire and Infrastructure Reserves Capital Accounts while maintaining a fiscally conservative approach to the Budget process. Action Items: Motion to adopt Resolutions 2005-132 approving the General Fund Budget and 2005-131 approving the final Levy in the amount of $ 2,149,940 Attachments: Resolution 2005-131 Resolution 2005-132 Person responsible: Tom Bouthilet CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-131 RESOLUTION ADOPTIONING FINAL TAX LEVY BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, County of Washington, Minnesota, that the following sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2006, upon the taxable property in the City of Lake Elmo for the following purposes: Total Levy S 2,149.940 ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty City Administrator CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-132 RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2006 GENERAL FUND BUDGET WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is required to adopt a formal budget for the general fund revenues; WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo held its Truth in Taxation Hearing on December 5, 2005; WHEREAS, the Lake City Council closed the public hearing on the 2006 general fund budget at the close of the meeting on December 6, 2004 without need for continuation; BE IT RESOLVED the Lake Elmo City Council adopts the 2006 general fund budget in the amount of $3,566,804 ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty City Administrator --Lake Elmo Agenda Section: NEW BUSINESS No. 6A. City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Item: Out -of -State Travel Policy State Statutes 471.661 states that by January 1, 2006, the governing body must develop a policy that controls travel outside the State of Minnesota for the applicable elected officials of the relevant unit of government. Please find a policy that was drafted from the League of Minnesota Cities Model and revised to fit the City needs. Action items: Motion Second to approve Resolution No. 2005-133, Elected Official Out -of -State Travel Policy. Attachments: Resolution No. 2005-133 State Statute 471.661 Person responsible: S. Lumby Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO RESOLUTION NO. 2005-133 CITY OF LAKE ELMO ELECTED OFFICIALS (MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS) OUT-OF-STATE TRAVEL POLICY Purpose: The City of Lake Elmo recognizes that its Elected Officials (Mayor and City Council Members) may at times receive value from traveling out of the state for workshops, conferences, events and other assignments. This policy sets forth the conditions under which out-of-state travel will be reimbursed by the City. General Guidelines: 1. The event, workshop, conference or assignment m-ust be approved in advance by the City Council at an open meeting and must include an estimate of the cost of the travel. In evaluating the out-of-state travel request, the Council will consider the following: • Whether the Elected Official will be receiving training on issues relevant to the City or to his or her role as the Mayor or as a Council Member; • Whether the Elected Official will be meeting and networking with other Elected Officials from around the country to exchange ideas on topics of relevance to the City or on the official roles of local Elected Officials. • Whether the Elected Official will be viewing a City facility or function that is similar in nature to one that is currently operating at, or under consideration by the City where the purpose for the trip is to study the facility or function to bring back ideas for the consideration of the full Council. Whether the Elected Official has been specifically assigned by the Council to visit another City for the purpose of establishing a goodwill relationship such as a "sister -City" relationship. Whether the Elected Official has been specifically assigned by the Council to testify on behalf of the City at the United States Congress or to otherwise meet with federal officials on behalf of the City. Whether the City has sufficient funding available in the budget to pay the cost of the trip. 2. No reimbursements will be made for attendance at events sponsored by or affiliated with political parties. 3. The City may make payments in advance for airfare, lodging and registration if specifically approved by the Council. Otherwise all payments will be made as reimbursements to the Elected Official. 4. The City will reimburse for transportation, lodging, meals, registration, and incidental costs using the same procedures, limitations and guidelines outlined in the City's Personnel Policy for City employees. 5. Mileage will be reimbursed at the IRS rate. If two or more Council Members travel together by car, only the driver will receive reimbursement. The City will reimburse for the cost of renting an automobile if necessary to conduct City business. 6. Lodging and meal costs are limited to those, which are reasonable and necessary. The Elected Official must use the most cost-efficient mode of travel available taking into consideration reasonable time constraints. Airfare will be reimbursed at the coach rate. 7. Receipts are required for lodging, airfare, parking, meals, and seminar upgrades and should accompany an expense report form. It is not necessary to have receipts for cabs and tips. The expense report form shall be submitted to the Finance Department for payment. 8. The City will not reinb-urse for alcoholic beverages, personal telephone calls, costs associated with the attendance of a family member, rental of luxury vehicles, meal expenses included in the cost of registration, or recreational expenses such as golf or tennis. 9. Limitations may be imposed on paying for expenses for a Council Member who has announced his/her intention to resign, not to seek reelection, or who has been defeated in an election. 10. The Council may request an oral or written report from the Elected Official on the results of the trip. 11. The Elected Official must turn over materials received to the City. 12. The City Council may make exceptions to the policy depending upon circumstances unique to the trip and/or Elected Official. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty City Administrator -Jiatutes 2005, 471.661 Page 1 of 1 Minnesota Statutes 2005. Table of Chapters Table of contents for Chapter 471 471.661 Out-of-state travel. By January 1, 2006, the governing body of each statutory or home rule charter city, county, school district, regional agency, or other political subdivision, except a town, must develop a policy that controls travel outside the state of Minnesota for the applicable elected officials of the relevant unit of government. The policy must be approved by a recorded vote and specify: (1) when travel outside the state appropriate; (2) applicable expense limits; and (3) procedures for approval of the travel. The policy must be made available for public inspection upon request and reviewed annually. Subsequent changes to the policy must be approved by a recorded vote. HIST: 2005 c 156 art 2 s 38 Copyright 2005 by the Office of Revisor of Statutes, State of Minnesota. http://www.revisor.leg.state.mmus/stats/471/661.html 11/29/2005 LMC MODEL: ELECTED OFFICI\A. -STATE -..VEL POLICY Purpose: The City of recognizes that its elected official may at times receive value from traveling out of the state for workshops, conferences, events and other assignments. This policy sets forth the conditions under which out-of-state travel will be reimbursed by the City. General Guidelines: The event, workshop, conference or assignment must be approved in advance by the City Council at an open meeting and must include an estimate of the cost of the travel. (Note: the League recommends use of a resolution or a detailed motion outlining what exactly is being approved.) In evaluating the out-of-state travel request, the Council will consider the following: • Whether the elected official will be receiving training on issues relevant to the city or to his or her role as the Mayor or as a council member; Whether the elected official will be meeting and networking with other elected officials from around the country to exchange ideas on topics of relevance to the City or on the official roles of local elected officials. • Whether the elected official will be viewing a city facility or function that is similar in nature to one that is currently operating at, or under consideration by the City where the purpose for the trip is to study the facility or function to bring back ideas for the consideration of the full council. • Whether the elected official has been specifically assigned by the Council to visit another city for the purpose of establishing a goodwill relationship such as a "sister -city" relationship (see Note below). • Whether the elected official has been specifically assigned by the Council to testify on behalf of the city at the United States Congress or to otherwise meet with federal officials on behalf of the city. • Whether the city has sufficient fimding available in the budget to pay the cost of the trip. 2. No reimbursements will be made for attendance at events sponsored by or affiliated with political parties. 3 The city may make payments in advance for airfare, lodging and registration if specifically approved by the council. Otherwise all payments will be made as reimbursements to the elected official. 4. The City will reimburse for transportation, lodging, meals, registration, and incidental costs using the same procedures, limitations and guidelines outlined in the city's policy for out-of-state travel by city employees. (If the city does not currently have a policy for city employees, consider adding the following: 5. Airfare will be reimbursed at the coach rate. 6 Mileage will be reimbursed at the IRS rate. If two or more council members travel together by car, only the driver will receive reimbursement. The city will reimburse for the cost of renting an automobile if necessary to conduct city business. 7. Lodging costs are limited to $ per night and meal costs are limited to $ per day. (lthe city sets such limits, it may want to keep in mind the differences in these costs throughout the country — especially coastal cities. Alternative language could he "Lodging and meal costs are limited to those which are reasonable and necessary.') 8. Receipts are required for lodging, airfare, and meals and should accompany an expense report form. It is not necessary to have receipts for cabs and tips. The expense report form shall be submitted to the City Clerk (or Finance Department) for payment. 9. The city will not reimburse for alcoholic beverages, personal telephone calls, costs associated with the attendance of a family member, rental of luxuiy vehicles, meal expenses included in the cost of registration, or recreational expenses such as golf or tennis. OTHER PROVISIONS THE CITY MAY WANT TO CONSIDER: • Limitations on the number of council members who can attend the same event; • Limitations on paying for council members who have announced their intention to resign, not to seek reelection, or who have been defeated in an election (however, there may be some benefit to the city in having newly elected officials who have not yet taken office attend training beforehand); • Requirements or council members to give oral or written reports on the results of the trip at the next Council meeting; • Requirements for the council members to turn over materials received to the city; • The ability for the city to make exceptions to the policy; • The requirement for all frequent flyer miles to accrue to the city; • Requirements to use the most cost-efficient mode of travel available taking into consideration reasonable time constraints; or • The requirement to use a city car when available; Note: The State Auditor's Office has taken the position in at least one city that there was no direct authority to expend public funds for the Sister City Program. lake Elmo City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Section: MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIREJBUILDING No. 7A. Agenda Item: Promote the Use of Intrastate Mutual Aid Agreements At its November 15th meeting, the City Council delayed action on this item so that the Fire Chief could provide the March 10, 2005 which lists the nine steps needed for initial implementation.. A copy of this memo is included for your reference. Action items: Motion Second to adopt Resolution No. 2005-134, A Resolution Promoting the Use of Intrastate Mutual — Aid Agreements. Attachments: March 10, 2005 Memo Resolution No. 2005-134 Person responsible: Chief Malmquist Time Allocated: M NNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBL C SAFETY Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement ARMER/911 Program Bureau of Crirrainal Apprehension Driver and Vehicle Services Homeland Security and Emergency Management Minnesota State Patrol Office of Communications Office of Justice Programs Office of Traffic Safety State rire Marshal and Pipeline Safety Homeland Security and Emergency Management 444 Cedar Street • Suite 223 • Saint Paul. Minnesota 55101-6223 Phone: 651,296.2233 • Fax: 651.296.0459 • 11.Y: 651.282.6555 www.dps.state.mn.us May 18, 2005 State and Local Partners; As Minnesota continues aggressively to implement Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD) 5 and 8, the National Incident Management System (NIMS) is a key element to compliance and effective implementation. The NIMS, the nation's first standardized approach to incident management and response, unifies federal, state; territorial, tribal and local lines of government into one coordinated effort. This integrated system makes the nation and Minnesota safer by establishing uniform response processes, protocols and procedures for all emergency responders. It ensures that those involved in emergency response operations understand their roles and have the tools they need to be effective. Minnesota has used a formal Incident Command/Management system for many years. In 1991, the state Legislature established MN Statute 115E, known as the Spills Bill. This bill required the commissioner of public safety to establish and implement an Incident Command System (ICS), now known as the Minnesota Incident Management System (MIMS). MIMS has been embedded in training throughout the state since 1996. As the state administrative agency and based on Minnesota's longstanding incident management training program, HSEM designates nine steps that state, local and tribal jurisdictions must take for initial implementation of the presidential directives and for initial NIMS ICS compliance in 2005. It is especially important to note that follow — Uri on these designated steps is necessary in order to remain eligible for future planning and preparedness federal grant programs. The nine steps needed for initial implementatio nd 8and for initial NIMS ICS compliance are identified in a memo dat entitled National Incident Management System: Incident CommcrndSystem ements Implementation in Minnesota. A copy of this memo is included for your reference. more EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Pages that follow will serve as a guide for state and local jurisdictions as they implement two of the nine steps. Please note that jurisdictions currently receiving homeland security grant funding and any county, city or township that intends to apply directly for federal preparedness, prevention or planning grants must adopt and implement NIMS at the local government level. The following guide will help state and local jurisdictions to: 0 Formally recoanize NIMS and adopt NIMS principles and policies States, territories, tribes and local entities shall establish a resolution to ally adopting NIMS. Promote intrastate mutual aid agreements State, tribe and local entities should establish resolutions promoting mutual — aid agreements (in accordance with MN Statutes, Chapter 12, Section 12.27 and Section 12.331). Ben Kosel, HSEM state agency coordinator, will lead our division's efforts to track progress on the items listed above. Please contact him with questions, comments or concerns at 651-215-6937, or e-mail him at beniamin.koselstate.mn.us. Thank you, Al Bataglia, Director Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management PARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY Alcohol and Gambling Enforcement ARMER/911 Program Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Driver and Vehicle Services Homeland Security and Emergency Management Minnesota State Patrol Office of Communications Office of Justice Programs Office of Traffic Safety State Fire Marshal and Pipeline Safety Homeland Security and Emergency Management 444 Cedar Street • Suite 223 • Saint Paul, Minnesota 55101-6223 Phone: 651.296.2233 • Fax: 651.296.0459 • TTY: 651.282.6555 www.dps.stateann.us National c.t Incident Command Sytm Elements Implementa on i Minnesota March 10, 2005 The President of the United States has issued Homeland Security Presidential Directives (HSPD) 5 and 8 that directly impact states and local jurisdictions. In Minnesota, the Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management (HSEM) is the State Administrative Agency (SAA) responsible for implementing these two directives through administration of the Homeland Security Grant Programs. One of the key elements of both HSPD 5 and 8 is the implementation of the National Incident Management System (NIMS). Minnesota has used a formalized Incident Command/Management system for many years. In 1991 the State Legislature established MN Statute 115E, known as the Spills Bill. This bill required the commissioner of public safety to establish and implement an Incident Command System (ICS) within the state, which we now know as the Minnesota Incident Management System (MIMS). MIMS was institutionalized in state training institutions in 1996 and has been embedded in training throughout the state ever since. HSEM recognizes that Minnesota has had a longstanding and well developed Incident Command training program, and we are now well ahead of many states when it comes to implementing the NIMS ICS requirements. Because we have had Incident Command/Management System training embedded in our training curriculum for almost 10 years and our MIMS training program is consistent with NIMS, we have met many of the baseline ICS requirements. The current MIMS curriculum is already ICS 100, 200 and 300 compliant and is currently being updated to include the ICS 400 requirements. The basic ICS training requirement in NIMS is already included in our MIMS curriculum. If your responders have already taken MIMS, you are in good shape for initial compliance with the basic ICS requirements in NIMS. Based upon Minnesota's longstanding incident management training program institutionalized throughout the state, HSEM (as the SAA) now recommends the following steps be taken for initial implementation of Homeland Presidential Directive 5 and 8 for initial NIMS ICS compliance in 2005. Formally re ordinance. izing the NIMS by adopting the NIMS principles and policies by resolution or Incorporating NIMS into existing training and exercise programs. Incorporating NIMS principles, policies and terminology into Emergency Operations Plans. Institutionalizing the use of the ICS across all disciplines and agencies within your jurisdiction by updating plans and procedures with the NIMS concepts and terminology. (Continued on the back) EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER Promoting intrastate mutual aid agreements by passing resolutions required in MN Statutes 12.27 Subd. 3 enabling local and statewide mutual aid. More information on our mutual aid Statute 12.27 and 12.331 will be coming soon from HSEM. IS 700 must be taken by all Emergency Managers. We strongly recommend that emergency response department leaders also take the IS-700 class and deteiinine who else within their jurisdiction would benefit from this class. More information about this class is available at http://training.ferna.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is700.asp. All Emergency Managers should take The National Response Plan (NRP), an Introduction IS-800. More information about this class is available at http://www.training.fema.gov/emiweb/IS/is800.asp. Institutionalizing the use of the ICS training by continuing to provide basic ICS training through the use of MIMS and other authorized curriculum. Jurisdictions that have not been using ICS should start by having their responders complete the NIMS Awareness Course: "National Incident Management System (NIMS), An Introduction" IS-700. This independent study course developed by the Emergency Management Institute (EMI) explains the purpose, principles, key components and benefits of NIMS. The course is available online and will take between 45 minutes to three hours to complete. The course is available on the EMI web page at: http://training.fema.gov/EMIWeb/IS/is700.asp. Establish a NIMS baseline by determining which NIMS requirements your jurisdiction already meets and then developing a strategy and timeline for full NIMS implementation. We recognize that most local entities have already implemented many of the concepts and protocols identified within NIMS. In order to assist you in determining your level of compliance with NIMS, the National Incident Management System Integration Center (NIC) has developed the NIMS Capability Assessment Support Tool (NIMCAST). The NIMCAST is a Web —based self —assessment system that states, territories, tribes and local governments can use to evaluate their incident response and management capabilities. This useful tool identifies the requirements established within the NIMS and can assist you in determining the extent to which you are already compliant as well as identify the NIMS requirements that you are not currently meeting. Additional information on NIMCAST is available at http://www.fema.govinimcast/index.jsp HSEM will be administering passwords and accessibility to the site by the end of March 2005. Minnesota is fortunate that we have had an ICS requirement since 1991 and statewide institutionalized ICS training program, such as MIMS, since 1996. As NIMS continues to evolve, more detailed information will be available. The main thing now is to formally adopt and use the NIMS, update plans so they are consistent with NIMS and conduct a compliance assessment to determine where your jurisdiction falls within the NIMS compliance guidelines. Full compliance with all of the NIMS requirements will take a long—tem' strategy that we will work toward together. HSEM recommends taking this one step at a time. The first step is to complete your NIMCAST compliance assessment and then to develop the long—terrn strategy and timeline for full and complete NIMS implementation. Please remember that the NIMS encompasses much more than just the ICS, although ICS is a critical component of the NIMS. It also provides a common foundation for training and other preparedness efforts, communicating and sharing information with other responders and with the public, ordering resources to assist with a response effort and for integrating new technologies and standards to support incident management. For the first time, all of the nation's emergency responders will use a common language and a common set of procedures, whether working individually or together to keep America safe. The NIMS ensures that jurisdictions will have the same preparation, the same goals, the same expectations, and most importantly, they will be speaking the same language. This document is intended to address only the basic ICS issues contained within NIMS. More detailed information is expected in late April, and the state of Minnesota Department of Public Safety Division of Homeland Security and Emergency Management will be forwarding the information as it is released. EXECUTIVE ORDER -02 DESIGNATION OF THE NATIONAL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT SYS I EM S) AS THE BASIS FOR ALL INCIDENT MANAGEMENT IN THE STATE OF TA I, TIM PAWLENTY, GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF M1NESOTA, by virtue of the authority vested in me by the Constitution and applicable laws, including Minnesota Statutes 2004, Section 221.0269, do hereby issue this executive order: WHEREAS, the President, in Homeland Security Directive HSPD-5, directed the secretary of the Department of Homeland Security to develop and administer a National Incident Management System (NIMS), which would provide a consistent nationwide approach for federal, state, local, and tribal governments to work together more effectively and efficiently to prevent, prepare for, respond to, and recover from domestic incidents, regardless of cause, size, or complexity; WHEREAS, the collective input and guidance from all federal, state, local, and tribal homeland security partners has been, and will continue to be, vital to the development, effective implementation, and utilization of a comprehensive NIMS; WHEREAS, it is necessary and desirable that all federal, state, local, and tribal emergency agencies and personnel coordinate their efforts to effectively and efficiently provide the highest levels of incident management; 'WHEREAS, to facilitate the most efficient and effective incident management, it is critical that federal, state, local, and tribal organizations utilize standardized teitninolo.qy and standardized organizational structures; interoperable communications; consolidated action plans; unified command structures; uniform personnel qualification standards; uniform planning, training, and exercising standards; comprehensive resource management, and designated incident facilities during emergencies or disasters; WHEREAS, the NIMS standardized procedures for managing personnel, communications, facilities, and resources will improve the state's ability to utilize federal funding to enhance local and state agency readiness, maintain first responder safety, and streamline incident management processes; WHEREAS, the Incident Command System components of NIMS are already an integral part of various incident management activities throughout the state, including current emergency management training programs; and WHEREAS, the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks (9-11 Commission) recommends adoption of a standardized Incident Command System; NOW, THEREFORE, I do hereby establish the National Interagency Incident Management System (NIMS) the state standard for incident management. Minnesota State Statute 2004, Chapter 12, Section 12.27 12.27 Mutual aid, arrangements. Subdivision 1. Authority; organizations in Minnesota. The director of each local organization for emergency management may, in collaboration with other public and private agencies within this state, develop or cause to be developed mutual —aid arrangements for reciprocal emergency management aid and assistance in an emergency or disaster too great to be dealt with unassisted. These arrangements must be consistent with the local emergency operations plan and, in time of emergency, each local organization for emergency management and its members shall render assistance in accordance with the provisions of the mutual —aid arrangements. Subd. 2. Authority; organizations in other states. The state director or the director of each local organization for emergency management may, subject to the approval of the governor, enter into mutual aid arrangements with emergency management agencies or organizations in other states for reciprocal emergency management aid and assistance in case of disaster too great to be dealt with unassisted. Subd. 2a. Authority; organizations in Canadian provinces. Subject to the approval of the governor, the state director may enter into mutual aid agreements with emergency management agencies or organizations in Canadian provinces for reciprocal emergency management aid and assistance in case of disaster too great to be dealt with unassisted. Subd. 3. Local delegation of authority. (a) No later than 90 days after August 1, 1996, the governing body of a political subdivision shall designate a city administrator or manager, public safety director, police chief, fire chief, public works director, or other officer who, exercising discretion and considering the needs of the political subdivision and its inhabitants, may dispatch equipment and personnel as considered necessary if a danger of fire, hazard, casualty, or another similar occurrence exists outside the political subdivision and by its suddenness it would be impractical for the governing body itself to authorize the dispatch of equipment and personnel to combat that emergency or disaster. (b) Action under this subdivision is an act of the political subdivision. All provisions for compensation of personnel, rental of equipment, liability insurance coverage, workers' compensation insurance, and other matters pertaining to the political subdivision, its equipment, and personnel, apply in each case as if specifically authorized and directed. (c) The officer shall end the use of equipment and personnel when the need no longer exists or earlier at the officer's discretion if it appears to be in the best interest of the political subdivision ... Minnesota State Statute 2004, Chapter 12, Section 12.331 12.331 Local assistance between political subdivisions. Subdivision 1. Authority between political subdivisions. When the public interest requires it because of an emergency, a political subdivision may request the assistance of another political subdivision. Upon receiving such a request, a political subdivision, called the "sending political subdivision," may go to the assistance of the requesting political subdivision, called the "receiving political subdivision." The receiving political subdivision may accept and use the personnel, equipment, and supplies of the sending political subdivision as agreed upon by both political subdivisions. Subd. 2. Effect. (a) Unless there is a written agreement between the political subdivisions establishing the rules for conducting these activities, the provisions of paragraphs (b) to (e) shall apply while the political subdivisions are engaged in the activities described in subdivision 1. (b) For the purposes of worker's compensation insurance, the employees, officers, and members of the sending political subdivision have the same powers, duties, rights, privileges, and immunities as if they were performing similar services in the sending political subdivision and are considered to be acting within the scope of and in the course of their regular employment, as employees of the sending political subdivision. (c) For the purposes of chapter 466, the employees and officers of the sending political subdivision are deemed to be employees, as defined in section 466.01, subdivision 6, of the receiving political subdivision. (d) The sending political subdivision shall be responsible for any damages to its equipment. (e) The receiving political subdivision shall reimburse the sending political subdivision for the supplies used and the compensation paid to the officers and members of the forces furnished, during the time when the rendition of aid prevents them from performing their duties in the sending political subdivision, and for the actual travel and maintenance expenses of the officers and members while so engaged. A claim for loss, damage, or expense in using equipment or supplies or for additional expenses incurred in operating or maintaining them must not be allowed unless within 90 days after the loss, damage, or expense is sustained or incurred, an itemized notice of it, verified by an officer or employee of the municipality having knowledge of the facts, is filed with the clerk of the receiving political subdivision. Subd. 3. Retroactive effect. Notwithstanding other laws this section is effective retroactive to March 29, 1998. CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2005 — 134 ADOPTING AND PROMOTING THE USE OF INTRASTATE MUTUAL —AID AGREEMENTS WHEREAS, Chapter 12, Section 12.331 allows for Intrastate Mutual Aid, and direct, timely assistance between jurisdictions is critical; and WHEREAS, the possibility of the occurrence of natural and other disasters of major size and destructiveness exists and is increasing; and WHEREAS, there is a need to ensure that preparations of City of Lake Elmo will be adequate to deal with disasters; generally protect the public peace, health, and safety; and preserve the lives and property of the people of the state; and WHEREAS, it is necessary to provide for the rendering of mutual aid among the political subdivisions of the state and to cooperate with the federal government with respect to carrying out emergency management functions; and WHEREAS, it is the policy of Minnesota that all emergency response functions of this state be coordinated to the maximum extent with the comparable functions of the state government, including its various departments and agencies, of other states and localities, and of private agencies of every type, to the end that the most effective preparations and uses may be made of the state's labor supply, resources, and facilities for dealing with any disaster that may occur; and WHEREAS, the director of each local organization for emergency management may, in collaboration with other public and private agencies within this state, develop or cause to be developed mutual —aid arrangements for reciprocal emergency management aid and assistance in an emergency or disaster too great to be dealt with unassisted. These arrangements must be consistent with the local emergency operations plan and, in time of emergency, each local organization for emergency management and its members shall render assistance in accordance with the provisions of the mutual —aid arrangements; and NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved that City of Lake Elmo promotes the efficiency and effectiveness of intrastate mutual aid by designating the City Administrator of Lake Elmo, Washington County, who, exercising discretion and considering the needs of the political subdivision and its inhabitants, to dispatch equipment and personnel as considered necessary if a danger of fire; hazard, casualty, or another similar occurrence exists outside the political subdivision and by its suddenness it would be impractical for the governing body of City of Lake Elmo itself to authorize the dispatch of equipment and personnel to combat that emergency or disaster. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean A. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Lake Elmo Agenda Section: MAINTENANCE/PARKTHIE/BUILDING N .7B. City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Item: (1) Building Dept. Monthly Update. (2) Connell Discussion on Side Yard Retaining Wall. (Verbal) (3) Relationship of Garage to Home Size. (Verbal) Background Information: (A) November Construction Activities Report. Action Items: Person responsible: Informational. No action needed. J. McNamara Attachments: Summary Building Report for November LA K 1 11] S Id RV MAST R PLAN AM. NDMENT PRELIMINARY DRAFT (December 1, 2005) This draft will. provide the reader with a good understanding of most of the key components of the Master Plan Amendment. It does not include Chapter 7 Park Operations and Management and severa sections of other chapters listed in the Table o' Contents. In addition to preparing the missing chapter nd sections, some of the narrative will he expandec nd more photos, charts and plans will be added to complete the final draft. shington ounty k Prepared by: Sanders Wacker Bergly, Landscape Architects and Planners 365 East Kellogg Boulevard Saint Paul, MN 55101 with Washington County Parks Division )5 I er MIMIlliulllLIW IIJYiWi1.4L,•111kb4MlbnuulYliiiimhllt 1GYuiIIYlAnr:lYulUui11:, • d, Illl Ilul l ail A l61 „m.�.� ibi R 11 .1116 Jw�lll�.� i Ilbi 11 IL. �a.66��de� 111 ub/: Table of Contents umkp , n:lal.: urWL il, i :LJIIN1111ti.L Ix,b b 'iS:iu. bIb4 LIIb,IfbuJi;'vf'ai..bbI � I.n li.. aWlo.lui. lid¢61a llllbxOtl l'a.IlYlu.s�ii911al,.IfUYlli@Yibulii,'llll l:Ili„x:.ed;w4siiail�.h:.IlldkeeYe� Chapter Page Introduction a. Overview of Lake Elmo Park Reserve........................................................................................1.1 b. Planning Process...........................................................................................................................1.2 c. Purpose/outcome...........................................................................................................................1.3 2. Recreation Demand Forecast a. Introduction .......... .................. ........................ ............. ,.............. .............. ....... ............ ............. ..... 2.1 b. Demographics...—. ..... •••.* .............. 10 *44 ...... * ........... ............. * ....... ...... ....... 4.4.• ...... 111. 444 ..... ..... 444/0 44 24 1 c, Recreation Demand .......................................................................................................................2.3 3. Cultural Resources Stewardship a. Introduction........................................................................................................................................ b. Legal and Regulatory Framework.................................................................................................3.1 c. Cultural & Natural History 3.2 d. Known & Potential Cultural Resources......................................................................................3.12 e. Archaeological Sensitivity Models 3.28 f. Recommendations 3.31 4. Natural Resources Stewardship a. Introduction................................................................................................................................... 4.1 b. Vegetative Cover 4.1 c. Invasive Plant Species; Management and Control 4,2 d. Soils 4.3 e. Topography.................................................4.3 f. Landscape Ecology and Sustainability 4.3 g. Natural Resource Education & Interpretation 4.4 h. Restorative Landscape Plan 4.5 i. Landscape Types and Plant Lists4.6 5. Development Plan a. Introduction.................................................................................................................................. 5.1 b. Development Objectives ....... ..................... .......:....... ....................... ....... ....... ......... ................... ........ c. Serving Special Needs........................................................................................................................ Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County Table of Contents 1 I11 1 11 I1 IY11 11 1 11I 11 II I III1 III 111 1 111 ill III 1 1 1 I1111I II II 11 I I II 1 III 1111III 1 II Hill 111 1111 I I I I III ill 11 1 1111 li 111 11 111 III 11 IIi 1II 11. 11 I d. Use and Development Conflicts....................„...„ .... ....... ..... ......... e. Buffer Zones f. Public Services g. Education and Interpretation h. Facilities Discussed and Omitted..................................................................................................5.7 i. Undeveloped Facilities Included in the 1978 Master Plan............................................................ 5.8 6. Park Boundaries and Acquisition a. Introduction........................................................................................................................................ b. Site Context and Adjacent Land Uses................................................................................................ C. Potential Land Acquisition................................................................................................................. 7. Park Operations and Management a. Introduction........................................................................................................................................ b. Ordinances c. Energy Conservation................................................................,.................................,,....................., d. Cost Estimates for Development, Operations and Maintenance.............. ...... ............... ....... ......... e. Revenue Sources f. Marketing.......................................................................................................................................... Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washing on County 2 i Chapter One - Introduction a1/11,/ /.11111.1 1 I buikidu lkllIIll I ii Ml th/gid,11 /a.,1,/is/ ui1 iio/411./s,440/.,,,hii iNowillkisdotimpiloymokklalatliqi,/,.14.1// //4§/ &NJ/. i I Ili Mom Chapter 1: Introduction Overview of Lake Elmo Park Reserve Lake Elmo Park Reserve is a natural resource -based regional park that is 2165 acres in size and is located in central Washington County. The site is within the limits of the City of Lake Elmo and is less than 2 miles from the east boundary of the City of Oakdale and the north boundary of Woodbury. As a "Reserve" the focus of the park is to provide the public with nature -oriented recreation opportunities such as viewing and studying wildlife and wildlife habitat, learning about conservation, swimming, picnicking, hiking, orienteering, boating, camping and trail uses. The original Master Plan for the park was completed in 1978. (See Figure 1.1) and the site was opened for public use and enjoyment in 1985. The early Master Plan directed development of a variety of facilities that have provided high quality recreation opportunities for residents of Washington County and the region. The facilities include the following (see Figure ?): • Paved trails(hiking, biking, inline skating) • Unpaved multi -use trails(mountain biking, equestrian, hiking, skiing, snowshoeing) • Modern campground • Primitive campsites • Group campground • Equestrian campground • Picnic areas • Swimming pond • Open field play areas • Playgrounds • Fishing pier • Boat launch • Contact station • Paved roads, parking lots, maintenance garage and other support facilities • Archery range • Orienteering course • Drainage control structures Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 1.1 Chapter One 7 Introduction In addition to the development of recreation facilities, the Parks Division has directed several projects focused on restoration and preservation of the park's natural resources. The work included successful prairie restoration projects, tree planting and construction of storm water management systems that helped to prevent erosion and improve water quality in lakes and wetlands. Other projects that were completed for enrichment of wildlife habitat include such efforts as the installation of cluck nesting platforms, bluebird houses and osprey nesting poles. The park is an oasis of expansive green open space in the midst of urban development. Diverse habitats include a deep water lake, a variety of wetlands, prairie, remnants of oak savanna and woodlands. The park also contains farm land still under cultivation and other fields where farming has been discontinued for various lengths of time. The County determined that the 1978 Master Plan has served its purpose and that it is time to prepare an amendment to the plan that addresses the effects of population growth, new trends in recreational needs and protection and restoration of natural resources. The plan also considers preservation and interpretation of cultural resources such as Native American Archeological features and the more recent European farmsteads. Consulting firm Sanders Wacker Bergly, Inc. (SWB), in association with Savanna Designs and ALO Environmental Associates, was commissioned by the Parks Division of the Washington County Department of Transportation & Physical Development in April 2005 to assist in the preparation of an amendment to the Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan. The content of the amendment is consistent with the guidelines established by the Metropolitan Council in its Regional Recreation Open Space and Policy Plan. The Master Plan Amendment will be used to guide operations and management of the park for the next 15 to 20 years. Planning Process The planning process began with an inventory and analysis of existing site conditions including built facilities, vegetation, soils, topography, drainage, vehicular and pedestrian circulation, etc, The information was assembled on plans and drawings for presentation at meetings with stakeholders and for inclusion in the master plan report. It is critical to understand existing site conditions, opportunities and constraints and apply this information to the preparation of plans for development, operations and management in the park. It is also important to review the data with interested stakeholders so everyone that contributes to the planning process forms their opinions and recommendations from a common information base. 1411131.. I I L. I 4 1i I ro , 01111MISOURIIMII Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 1.2 1978 MASTER P N Figure 1,11 Aii911411110614,,hcimill111 1,11I01 11 hhhJ11..144 141136 010,1 111114 I dI0h. IllIhofl hhh hill IIh0hrII, 1.1 iIIhh, 610i ,0141,114, Chapter One - Introduction The program for park development evolved as a result of input received from county staff, other agencies and the public at large. Public meetings included large and small group discussions and attendees were encouraged to fill out comment cards to document their recommendations. The cards also gave those that are reluctant to speak in group settings an opportunity to provide input. Public participation efforts included meetings, work sessions and other communicaton with the following stakeholder groups: • Meetings with Parks Division Staff to gather background information on Lake Elmo Park Reserve and the county park system and to gain input on county goals and objectives and subsequent design concepts. • Five meetings with the Technical Advisory Committee to receive input on site analysis information, goals and objectives and design concepts. The committee is comprised of representatives from the Cities of Lake Elmo, Oakdale and Woodbury, the Washington Conservation District and the Washington County Park and Open Space Commission. • Three public open houses were held early in the process to receive input from area residents on goals and objectives and design concepts. One meeting was held in Lake Elmo, one in Oakdale and one in Woodbury. Additional input was received from each community at open meetings with the city councils. • Public input was received from visitors to the Parks Division booth at the County Fair through discussion and comment cards. • Information about the planning effort was posted on the County Web site and comments were received via email. Input received from stakeholders during the planning process was used to help establish goals and objectives for preparation and refinement of the develoment and management plans for the park. Purpose/Outcome The primary purpose of the Master Plan Amendment is to provide guidance and information on the following topics to the Washington County Parks Division, County Park and Open Space Commission, County Board of Commissioners, Metropolitan Council and others responsible for operation and maintenance of the park. The content is based on the eleven requirements for master plan content listed in the Metropolitan Council's Regional Recreation Open Space Policy Plan that follow: Boundaries and Acquisition Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 1,3 Chapter One - Introduction • Stewardship Plan • Demand Forecast • Development Concept • Conflicts • Public Services • Operations • Citizen Participation • Public Awareness • Special Needs • Natural Resources In addition, the planning process played the important role of bringing together county residents, staff and officials, agencies and other stakeholders to assess the park's current condition and to plan its future in an open format that encouraged public participation. The amendment was recommended for approval by the County Park and Open Space Commission on ? and presented to the County Board of Commissioners at a public hearing on ?. II.kokl I Ip ot 13 4..11 la .11., ...II .1 1 1 ,1 p I WS ik 1111a1 11 1 11,1, 11,1111 II .31 alilI, i WA ,6,1•1111. ‘i 11 1,1 .1AStiiiiiiiinialikaa, 1 II 11 11111 U4II1114.4=all h lei I. I.101 1. AIMINIMMEAIMPM1011 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 1 A Chapter Two - Recreation Demand Forecast 11140 ILIA ii.(41,11111i, I I I 1,1111111 Oar iiiiil,1111111 i liork uI 1 JiiIiIi hlEIowa ouL.1,), Ohl Ala Illdli,1116 ,jlPji ii 111161MA, 1.11fill 04114111 AP110111411, VII 11;1111; atpd Chapter 2: Recreation Demand Forecast Introduction Lake Elmo Park Reserve provides a variety of outdoor recreation opportunities that are popular with residents of Washington County and the region. The demand for specific facilities and programs is determined chiefly by trends in recreation interests and demographics. Participation in traditional activities such as hiking, swimming and nature observation continues to grow and the number of participants in newer activities such as mountain biking and orienteering is also expanding. Population growth and the fact that people are devoting more time to leisure activities establish a growing need and greater demand for the type of facilities that may be offered by the county at Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The planning process considered the following information sources to aid in identifying trends affecting user patterns and recreation needs relating to the park: 1. Input received from residents, county staff, county officials and other stakeholders 2. Washington County 2004 Visitor Study 3, Washington County Parks Division 2004 Annual Report 4, MNDNR 2004 Outdoor Recreation Participation survey of Minnesotans 5. Annual Use Estimate of the Metropolitan Regional Parks System for 2004 6. U.S. Census Data Demographics The population in Washington County and the seven county Metropolitan Area has grown steadily since 1990 with the county's growth rate being three times that of the overall state. The U.S. Census Bureau projects continued growth in the county and Metro Area through 2030. Figure ? shows growth statistics for this period. Figure ? Metropolitan Council Household Forecasts for Washington County 1990 2000 2010 2120 2030 49,246 71,462 93,949 116,834 138,117 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 2.1 • Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 2.2 Chapter Two - Recreation Demand Forecast Metropolitan Council Population Forecasts for Washington County 1990 2000 2010 2120 2030 145,880 201,130 244,732 296,693 342,620 Metropolitan Council Household Forecasts for the Metropolitan Area 1990 2000 2010 2120 2030 875,504 1,021,256 1,202,539 1,369,984 1,496,607 Metropolitan Council Population Forecasts for the Metropolitan Area 1990 2000 2010 2120 2030 2,288729 2,642,062 3,028,102 3,376,723 3,639,750 The age profile of Washington County residents (see Figure ?) is similar to the state averages for those under 5 and under 18, however, only 7.6% of county residents are over 65 compared to 12.1% of state residents. The male to female ratio is the same as the state average. Washington County residents are somewhat more affluent than the average Minnesotan which is evidenced by a higher median household income ($66,305.00 vs. $47,111.00), fewer individuals with incomes below the poverty level (2.9% vs. 7.9%) and fewer multi -unit housing structures (12.5% vs. 22.3%). Income affects the ability of people to pay for equipment and fees required to participate in leisure activities and to pay transportation expenses required to gain access to the activities. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resource's (MNDNR) '2004 Outdoor Recreation Particioation, Survey of Minnesotans' (ORPSM) states: "Most of Minnesotan's outdoor recreation occurs near home and within the state. Just under 70 percent (67%) of all recreation use (hours) is within a half-hour drive of home, and nearly 90 percent (89%) occurs in Minnesota." LEPR is a 15 minute drive from the heart of St. Paul and approximately 30 minutes from Minneapolis. Development is spreading rapidly from the Metro core in all directions to Anoka, Carver, Scott, Dakota and Washington Counties. As development devours rural open space, urbanites must travel farther to experience fewer havens of green open space. Many people have an inherent need to escape, occasionally, from city environs to a rural or "natural setting". LEPR joins Afton and William O'Brien State Parks and the St. Croix Valley as a major, regional, recreation open space destination in Washington County. LEPR is the nearest of these facilities as recreators travel west from the Twin Cities area into the county. The park's proximity to 1-94, 1-694 1.115111161M g. I 111111111111111410M10.1w i Gal Ai ea III A.1001,1/1., WWI .161 II tallow Chapter Two Recreation Demand Forecast •IIIiIIIh. iti 1111 IUiL,AAil I llama ,111 I 41 a NI I AYA,114ili1,4Aua AllidAdadiciAlmiildthadAAAAAAMIW.IANAAkiAAAtioAlAii IkAwaltAkiesamAAAANAAAWAALAAAAAAli A A iithAud. ,1141 dia iii,:1,1111 and Hwy. 36 provides clear, convenient access. The 2004 Washington County Visitor Study indicates that, during the years 2001 - 2004, 40% of the park visitors were out -of -county residents. The number of visitors to LEPR in 2004 was 476,859. In view of the fact that statistics indicate a growth trend in leisure time among the general populace, it would be reasonable to expect that the number of visitors will increase at a rate greater than population growth. If, at some future time, the number of visitors exceeds the carrying capacity of the park and its facilities, Washington County may elect to impose limitations on park access. It is expected that the useful life of the Master Plan Amendment will be at least 15 years. Projections in Figure ? suggest that the number of visitors will increase by approximately 158,725 or 30% during that period. Some of die existing park facilities such as the modern campground, picnic shelters and archery range are currently operating at full capacity during heavy use periods. The projected visitor increase highlights the need to revisit the Master Plan and prepare recommendations that will provide guidance to the county for effectively managing future development and maintenance of the park. Recreation Demand Outdoor recreation is an important part of most people's lives. The MNDNR '2004 Outdoor Recreation Participation Survey of Minnesotans' (ORPSM) mentions that 57% of Minnesotans "indicate that outdoor recreation is 'very important' to their life, while another 25 percent indicate it is 'moderately important'. The remainder -comprising one in five Minnesota adults (18%) - believe outdoor recreation is of little importance." The survey also mentions that outdoor recreators have the following reasons for going outdoors (listed in order of survey rank): 1. Enjoy nature 2. Exercising and feeling healthier 3. Build bonds with family and friends 4. Escape pressures of modern life 5. Experience piece and quiet 6. Learning and Exploring The ORPSM further indicates that the following activities are popular among Minnesota adults (listed in order of survey rank based on numbers that participate): . Walking/hiking outdoors for exercise or pleasure Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 2.3 Chapter Two - Recreation Demand Forecast IL I P II II I II 1,1111111111 1 1.1 II 1. I I II 2. Boating of all types 3. Swimming 4. Driving for pleasure 5. Picnicking 6. Fishing of all types 7. Biking 8. Visiting outdoor zoos 9. Camping of all types 10. Visiting nature centers 11. Nature observation of all types The Washineton County Visitor Study - A Summary of Results Amon e All Respondents from 2001 - 2004' indicates that responses recorded during four years of surveying park visitors resulted in the following ranking of recreational activities (based on activities in which respondents participated): 1. Biking on pavement 2. Camping 3. Walking 4. Swimming 5. Fishing 6. Boating 7. Play areas 8. Gardening 9. Nature walks/trails 10. Running The findings of the MNDNR and Washington County surveys are generally consistent with recreation trends that have been apparent in the use of facilities at Lake Elmo Park Reserve and with input received from stakeholders during the planning process. The facilities that are existing or considered for development in the Master Plan Amendment include the following: 211 11 • 1 I '116111,1 I 1 1111 1111 11 a I.. • 1Yi 11 • P.) taut ae 11 • Trails including hiking, biking, skiing, snowshoeing and horseback riding • Family, group, primitive and equestrian camping • Picnicking • Fishing pier • Boat landing improvements (no expansion) P1/111. .01.1P.AMMIME .1 1 III I 1 hILI 1.1,p11 11,11 11..11 OH a JI6 .11114 N1111 •.• 114111 w o111,1111I 1,11p, IllaeniiiiiiMUSI.II!IIIIS,,JI I Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 2.4 Chapter Two - Recreation Demand Forecast ,I IlWIIIIu.U1111, II1J1I!YIYi111.I.i,liYli Id IN, ilk Won I I,YIdI I! mid 4I4II. N11441L1111141111V. , 1111,., 1 1 I114 1111 ; Ik, IIIII,IIL 11 1 .UINPI. ill, MIA.11ma:;111;,Ii11AI.0I04IiiIai1I.u71e::.51114'14ua4111 1111111 kb!11!JIl1r:11.1101411Ih1m111411dU1llilLa5 IYI II1..1,,,,linlilul llu, • Nature center • Natural and cultural resource protection, restoration and interpretation • Interpretive center • Outdoor program area • Field and traditional archery ranges The `Development Plan' section of the plan contains detailed information about the addition and expansion of facilities. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County IL Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship '000110101011.01 • 1101110 10000110101111111101111111100011111111110110 141100110 .,1 11 1 II iliI116i I i 1,44,1111 klgi$Wilk.60j101V4M1 IOW Ad 00,4 .0101000114/0110401 1I.111111011011111100k111011111,16114,01111.0,01004.0/00611,,0000 1101.11 0.11101101i11111 Chapter 3: Cultural Resources Stewardship Legal & Regulatory Framework The County will need to consider the legal and regulatory framework within which any future development is proposed at the Park Reserve. A proposed development or redevelopment project involving federal funds or permits will require compliance with various federal laws and regulations. Laws such as the "National Environmental Policy Act of 1969" (PL 91-190) and the "National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA) of 1966 as amended" (PL 89-665) provide protection for the nation's cultural resources. The NEPA requires that archaeological and other historic resources be considered during the environmental assessment process and in environmental impact studies. The NHPA established a national historic preservation policy; created the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP) and the cabinet -level Advisory Council on Historic Preservation (ACHP); and established the Section 106 process, which requires consideration of cultural resources for undertakings that are federally funded, licensed, or permitted. It is not uncommon for park & recreation projects to involve impacts to wetlands thereby necessitating a permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). A USACE permit, in turn, will federalize the entire proposed project so that compliance with Section 106 of the NHPA will also become necessary. Since the Park Reserve is owned & operated by Washington County, political subdivisions of the State of Minnesota, state statutes also apply to lands within the Park Reserve. For instance, the "Minnesota Historic Sites Act" (MS 138.51), the "Field Archaeology Act of 1963" (MS 138.31-.42), the "Private Cemeteries Act" (MS 307.08), the "Outdoor Recreation Act of 1975" (MS 86A), and the "Minnesota Environmental Rights Act" (MS 116B) all apply to lands within the Park Reserve, The Minnesota Historic Sites Act recognizes that "[i]t is in the public interest to provide for the preservation of historic sites, buildings, structures, and antiquities of state and national significance for the inspiration, use, and benefit of the people of the state." This law directs state agencies and departments to cooperate with each other and the Minnesota Historical Society (MHS) in protecting properties listed in the NRHP or State Register of Historic Places and that may be affected by state or local undertakings. The Field Archaeology Act ensures that "[t]he state of Minnesota reserves to itself the exclusive right and privilege of field archaeology on state sites, in order to protect and preserve archaeological and scientific Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.1 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 111111111111111111111111111 11111 III 111I11111 1111 I 11111 1,11111111t111111 11.11111..11 Ii111 1 1 ILI 1 1,1111 .11, 1 1,11.11, 11 1.1111 111,11 1111111.11111. III! ,.1 1,1 Ill L11.1111111. 41111 [1111. II . !II. I, all.' information, matter, and objects." This law established the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA), and directs state agencies to cooperate with the OSA and the MHS in protecting known or suspected archaeological sites on non-federal, publicly owned or leased land or waters, or on land or waters affected by publicly funded (state and local) projects. The Private Cemeteries Act states that"... all human burials and human skeletal remains shall be accorded equal treatment and respect for human dignity (t)he state archaeologist shall authenticate all burial sites for purposes of this section ..." The Outdoor Recreation Act covers the "... the unique natural, cultural and historical resources of Minnesota [that] provide abundant opportunities for outdoor recreation and education..." The act encourages these resources to "...be made available to all the citizens of Minnesota now and in the future." The Minnesota Environmental Rights Act asserts that "... each person is entitled by right to the protection of air, water, land and other natural resources within the state..." The state's definition of natural resources in this context includes historical resources. This legal & regulatory framework means that the County should be prepared at a minimum to coordinate with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) and/or the OSA for plans involving new construction and reconstruction within the Park Reserve's exterior boundaries. In many cases, the County also should be prepared to conduct archaeological & historical investigations prior to many future projects. The biggest functional difference between federal- & state -level compliance is that federal compliance requires consideration of adverse impacts that would result from proposed development within the viewshed of NRHP-eligible or listed cultural resources. If the County contemplates the addition of any new standing structures sometime in the future (e.g., interpretive or education centers, telecommunications towers, etc.) or modifications to existing historic standing structures, then Section 106 of the NHPA will need to be addressed. Cultural & Natural History Statewide Contexts According to the most recent Preservation Plan,' approximately 50,000 historic structures and 15,000 archaeological sites have been identified in Miamesota. Only 6,500 of these individual properties are Working Together: A Preservation Planter Minnesota's Historic Properties, 2000-2005. Accessed online at Ittto://www.innIts.ordoreserve/shpo/MSPPv I ,odf 111116111111. , • , 4 , Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment —Washington County 1. 14.1 II t II II d adklagienLA d 1 41 dada 3.2 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship .L1i40.44,16...,1604:JoAkiia" ,i4.14-4111-$1..11144WiLiG.1.1.1.,...11.../....waruukliMuLALLIJ6k4kiii4,4.164a4411.164101i.W.1141161.66.412.14LallialkWaiiiillitmalifilL1.16A111.411kbAile.14461rAluiluaidikililthlethh listed on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), although they are distributed among all of the State's counties. To evaluate the significance of the historic resources across the State, the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) created a three -tiered framework of historic contexts. These contexts are defined by time period, theme, and geographical area: Broad statewide patterns encompassing three periods: Pre -Contact (9500 B.C. - A.D. 1650), Contact (A.D. 1650 - 1837) and Post -Contact (A.D. 1837 - 1945). Specific themes, identified as needed, to evaluate properties best understood in a framework smaller than statewide patterns. Contexts developed by a particular city or other local area for use in local planning. Within the Pre -Contact Period (9,500 B.C. - A.D. 1650) archaeologists recognize specific historic contexts (e.g., Paleoindian Tradition, Archaic Tradition, Woodland Tradition, Late Prehistoric Period, Mississippian Tradition, and Oneota Tradition). The Contact Period (A.D. 1650 - 1837) is associated with various American Indian contexts (e.g., Eastern Dakota and Ojibwe) and Euro-American contexts (e.g., French, British, and Initial United States Presence) since this is the timeframe in which first Europeans then later Euro-Americans interacted with local American Indians. Examples of Post -Contact Period contexts that are relevant to the MWW carnpuses: (1) Reservations & the Indian Community (1830s-1930s), (2) St. Croix Triangle Lumbering (1830s-1900s), (3) Early Agriculture & River Settlement (1840-1870), (4) Railroads & Agricultural Development (1870-1940), and (5) Urban Centers (1870-1940). Statewide historic contexts have been further subdivided into a variety of thematic contexts. For example, some thematic contexts that may be relevant to the MWW campuses include (1) lithic scatters, (2) earthworks. (3) Red River trails (1835-1871), (4).military roads (1850-1875), (5) quarries and mines, and (6) geographic features of cultural significance. The following section examines detailed information about the development of the natural and cultural landscapes through the Contact Petiod. Expected archaeological site types are also mentioned in this discussion. American Indian Cultural & Natural History Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.3 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 1111110111111111=111111111111111111 Ion milli ft. J1.11.111111ill 111 1i1 IIIMINIIMINNIMMM 1111 1111.1 1 1 III II 1.1,1..111. I 1111 1 , .11 I HI IIIIMME1 1111111 1. 1111 I HUI' 1 I ,, . 1 061 0111, III II, Ill I. 11 11111,1 1111 11111_11 1. ill! 1111 III 111111 III 11111141 11 1 111111, .L 11111111 .1111 11 The cultural sequence in Minnesota begins with the Paleoindian and Early Archaic periods (ca. 10,000 — 3,000 B.C.). As glaciers receded from the Upper Midwest, migratory groups of people settled throughout the areas of open woodlands and succeeding grasslands, hunting native herding animals, such as bison and mastodon, and likely exploiting available small game, fish and plant resources as well (Shane 1989). Throughout much of this early timeframe, the climate was becoming successively warmer and drier than dining the glacial period. In addition to distinctive projectile points, the tool kits included large, bifacially flaked knives, simple choppers, and large scrapers (Harrison et al. 1995; Florin 1996; Higginbottom 1996). The settlement pattern is poorly understood for these groups of people, but it is largely accepted that they followed a mobile nomadic lifestyle. Expected site types include isolated and communal animal kill sites, short-term habitations, base camps, burials, quarries, lithic workshops, rockshelters, petroglyph (rock art) sites, and specialized processing sites (Clouse 1985). No Paleoindian or Early Archaic sites are known in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Characteristic of the Middle -Late Archaic periods (ca. 3,000 - 800 B.C.) was a continued reliance on large game (i.e., bison to the west, and deer, elk, and moose to the east) and increasingly diversified technologies associated with hunting, trapping, fishing, foraging, woodworking, and plant processing. This diversification reflects more highly regionalized adaptations to local environmental conditions as climatic trends shifted to cooler and wetter conditions, a pattern that continues today. Chipped -stone tools, such as stemmed and notched projectile points, dominated the tool kits, but the use of pecked- and ground -stone tools also became widespread. The use of copper implements is apparent late in this span of time (Bleed 1969; Gibbon 1998). Evidence for the exploitation of diverse floral and faunal resources suggests a seasonal round type of subsistence -settlement system, with habitation areas often located along the margins of lakes and major rivers. Expected site types are lithic workshops, quarries, plant -gathering sites, fishing sites, petroglyphs, specialized processing sites, permanent villages, hunting campsites, rockshelters, communal hunting sites, and burials (Clouse 1985). No Middle -Late Archaic sites have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The Woodland Period (ca. 800 B.C. - A.D. 1630) in the region may have been associated with incipient plant domestication, but hunting with intensive wild rice gathering provided for the bulk of subsistence needs. Settlement patterns resembled those appearing previously, with particularly intense occupation of stream and lake junctions late in the period. The production of ceramic items is an especially significant technological innovation of the Woodland Period. Ceramic types commonly found in the region include Malmo, Howard Lake, Brainerd, St. Croix, Onamia, Black Duck, Clam River, and Sandy Lake (Anfinson 1979), Mound construction associated with mortuary activity also developed during this period, and this region possesses the highest concentration of mound sites in the State (Winchell 1911; Wilford et al. 1969). Expected site types include quarries, lithic workshops, clay -extraction sites, ceramic manufacturing sites, hunting camps, permanent villages, specialized processing sites, plant -gathering 1 1 I I LIJIMI k di al I Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.4 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 414 1,11141114 01.13 11114411 Sul I:444W,, 1111 othi11.411141 11,1404s,4011 wo,,k44111,11iIJ 11 LIIilrniIl 11101111 01111,Mg 41W 111114 sites, fishing sites, rockshelters, petroglyph sites, burials, and possibly even horticultural fields (Clouse 1985). No Woodland sites have been recorded at the Lake Elmo Park Reserve, although sites 21WA0057 & 21WA0058 at Eagle Point Lake are thought to be late prehistoric or early protohistoric in age (see descriptions below). Evidence of what Clouse (1985) calls "Southern Minnesota Upper Mississippian (Oneota)" and what Dobbs & Anfinson (1989) simply refer to as Oneota (ca. A.D. 1000-1300) has been reported for the region, with the largest reported sites along the margins of major river valleys or other water bodies (Gibbon 1973, 1982). In this region these cultures appear to have been characterized by a blended subsistence strategy based on simple agriculture, gathering, and bison hunting. Possible site types include semi -permanent villages, permanent and possibly fortified villages and outlying farmsteads, horticultural fields, quarries, lithic workshops, clay -extraction sites, ceramic manufacturing sites, hunting camps, specialized processing sites, plant -gathering sites, fishing sites, rockshelters, petroglyph sites, and burials (Clouse 1985; Dobbs & Anfinson 1989). No Oneota sites are known in the Lake Elmo Park ReserVe. Early in the Historic Period (ca. A.D. 1630) the western portions of this region were occupied by Yankton Dakota, while Eastern Dakota occupied the east (Wedel 1974). One Eastern Dakota property type for the Contact Period is the large, semi -permanent village (Dobbs 1989). Additional property types for the Eastern Dakota in the Contact Period may be recognized through extrapolation backward in time from those recorded in the mid-1800s (Post -Contact Period, see below). They include summer residential and logistical base camps, winter camps, wild ricing camps, maple sugaring camps, muskrat procurement sites, cranberry camps, deer -hunting base camps, deer cache sites and deer kill sites, and scaffold burial sites (Dobbs 1989). No Contact Period Dakota sites have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve, although sites 21WA0057 & 21WA0058 at Eagle Point Lake are thought to be late prehistoric or early protohistoric in age (see descriptions below), Written descriptions of the Ojibwe as Upper Great Lakes inhabitants date as far back as A.D. 1640. During the 18 century there was a major geographical expansion of Ojibwe populations, possibly as a result of sociopolitical pressures exerted on them by the westward expansion of Europeans from the East Coast. Anfinson (2003:57) says "the impact of French trade on intertribal relations and tribal migrations exceeded the French presence and would increase the Dakota's use of the MNRRA corridor." Wars between the Ojibwe and Dakota lasted from the 1730s until 1854, and Ojibwe peoples finally displaced the Dakota southward and westward by the early 1900s. Based on ethnohistoric records several property types have been suggested; seasonal villages, small wintering camps, maple sugaring camps, wild tieing camps, fishing stations, cemeteries and other religious and sacred places, and battle sites (Dobbs 1989). No Ojibwe sites of the Contact Period have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve, although sites Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 3.5 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 11111 ill il 11 !III 1111ii1111111 111111 11111111 11111I III 11 11 11 11111 0111101.11111lJl lui oi 1,i Hui Hill JL 11 1. 1. 1,.11,11111 1,1111111111111,1. 1111. 1 11111.1.11. 1[111 1111i.., 1 .1 1.1 11.1.1 1 J.,1 21WA0057 & 21WA0058 at Eagle Point Lake are thought to be late prehistoric or early protohistoric in age (see descriptions below). Natural History The Lake Elmo Park Reserve falls within the archaeological zone that Anfinson (1990) calls "Region 4: Central Deciduous Lakes" on the basis of its topography and primary natural vegetation. The topography of this region is a patchwork of glacial deposits - moraines, till plains, and outwash plains. Numerous lakes, some over 100 feet deep, are located in Region 4. These lakes are remnants of melted ice blocks left behind as the Laurentide icesheet and its associated lobes and sublobes retreated northward at the end of the last Ice Age (Wisconsinan). The larger precursors of today's lakes are called "glacial lakes" (e.g., Glacial Lake Agassiz and Glacial Lake Duluth). Likewise the broader precursors of today's rivers are called "glacial rivers" (e.g., Glacial River Warren). The Mississippi River now flows through the eastern and central parts Anfinson's Region 4; the St. Croix River is the region's eastern boundary. In early historic times, the vegetation in the southern and western parts of Region 4 was dominated by Big Woods with numerous, large patches of prairie and oak woodlands. The U.S. General Land Office (GLO) first surveyed Oakdale Township in 1847. At this time the only cultural resource depicted on Trygg's (1969) map in the St. Paul -to -Stillwater Road, which is just north of the northernmost Park Reserve boundary (Figure 1). Vegetation encountered by the GLO surveyors was classified by Marschner (1930) as "Oak Openings & Barrens," "Prairie," and "Wet Prairies, Marshes & Sloughs." Euro-American History According to Dobbs (1989:62), the first century of European presence in Minnesota is often referred to as the "French Regime." The French presence began in the early 1600s with explorers, clergymen, and fur traders (Birk 1991); the "regime" ended in 1763 when the British took control of Canada. Property types associated with the French include permanent fortifications, temporary yet fortified outposts, accommodations for Frenchmen in Indian villages, special activity areas (e.g„ transient encampments, seasonal fishing or hunting camps, kill sites, portages, battlegrounds, mines, burials, etc.), and canoe accident sites or other places where lost or discarded items might have been deposited. The French explorer LeSeuer was in the general area in 1695 but civilian settlement was sparse until the 1840s. No French sites of the Contact Period have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. From 1762 until the Louisiana Purchase by the United States in 1803, the Mississippi River was the focal point of territorial flip-flops among France, Spain, and Britain. This time period not only marked shifting 1LIst4.1111. '• 441 .1 111'11,01 1 1 41'• 11 II. 111A1 ' •11 I, 1,14 1111•1111 1'1111 ''0 • 11 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.6 'Iiroaallik111191,1h11111.1111W1,11. Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship and often violent relationships among American Indian groups (see Dakota and Ojibwe, above) but it also involved shifting allegiances between American Indian groups and the various European nations staking claims throughout North America. Dobbs (1989) suggests that wintering posts and small posts are likely property types to have been inhabited by British traders. No British sites of the Contact Period have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Shortly after the Louisiana Purchase the Initial United States Presence began in Minnesota with Zebulon Pike's visit to Minnesota (1804-05). Major Stephen Long first arrived in 1817; Camp Coldwater was founded in 1819 near the confluence of the Mississippi and Minnesota rivers and construction of Fort Snelling began in the early 1820s. A variety of property types related to domestic, military, economic (trading), agricultural, and religious functions - is possible for this historic context. However, no Initial U.S. sites have been recorded in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Euro-American settlement in the region began with the establishment of Ft. Snelling at the confluence of the Minnesota River and Mississippi River. Commercial centers formed first around the water -powered mills of St. Anthony Falls and the northernmost navigable reaches of the Mississippi River (Anfinson 1989). The region saw the development of agricultural communities in the west and lumbering centers in the east during the mid- to late-1800s. Steamboat traffic grew quickly after 1823 (Anfinson 2003). In 1825 a treaty was signed at Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin. Among other things, this treaty effectively separated Minnesota's two inajor American Indian groups into Ojibwe territory in the north and Dakota territory in the south. Through a subsequent series of treaties between 1837 and 1889, American Indians ceded most of their lands to the U.S. Government. These actions led to the period of Reservations and the Indian Community (1830s-1930s). Ojibwe reservations in Minnesota include Fond du Lac, Grand Portage, Leech Lake, Mille Lacs, Nett Lake (Bois Forte), Red Lake, and White Earth. Following the U.S.-Dakota War of 1862, the Dakota were driven from Minnesota. However, many Dakota returned to Minnesota in the late 19th century, settling in the communities of Lower Sioux, Upper Sioux, Prairie Island, and Shakopee Mdewakanton. Examples of property types associated with this historic context are ceremonial and religious sites, reservations, U.S.-Dakota battle sites, missions, churches, missionary residences, mission schools, Government schools, Indian community centers (particularly in urban areas), representative housing types, commercial establishments, sites associated with Federal Indian policy, sites associated with continued traditional land uses (State Historic Preservation Office 1985). None of these property types have been recorded previously for in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Concurrent with the move to reservations and associated battles and other activities, the new American settlers of the region began to significantly alter the natural landscape to support a variety of growing Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 3.7 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 111 1111 11 III 1 11 11 111 11011III I 1 H1 11111101111 II 1 1111 11111 1111 11 II 111 11111111dr 1111111111111111111 11. 11111111 II '11111II II 111 1 1I 11 111 11 11111111 11,1011 I 1 1111111.11I1 1111 1111 11111111 1111 1 1111 11111 1 I 11 I III 11111 1 III 11 1111111111 socioeconomic demands. The white pine forests, many on lands ceded by the Dakota and Ojibwe in 1837, were key to the development of the region (State Historic Preservation Office 1985). Entrepreneurs from New England who had already over -forested that region developed a lumbering economy based on cutting wood in the winter and transporting the timber logs down the St. Croix, Rum, and Mississippi rivers in the spring to boom sites (State Historic Preservation Office 1985). The logs were milled at sawmills along the rivers — several of these sites served as the centers of townsite development (e.g., Stillwater and Anoka). Milled lumber was shipped down the Mississippi River to Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, and other destinations. These activities are subsumed within the historic context entitled, St. Croix Triangle Lumbering (1830s-1900s). Some primary property types associated with this historic context include lumber mill sites, housing for loggers, logging dam sites, boom sites, farm camps, townsites and associated structures (e.g., residences, commercial buildings, churches, public buildings). None of these property types have been recorded in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The opening of Minnesota lands by the Federal and Territorial governments created additional opportunities for immigrants. Settlement initially occurred largely along waterways, including the Mississippi River and its tributaries. The earliest settlements began in Washington County in the 1840s and then "spread, fan -like, westward" (State Historic Preservation Office 1985). Lake Elmo and other towns like it were established during this period of Early Agriculture and River Settlement (.1840s-1870s). Many of the towns became centers for processing crops, such as flour and sorghum mills and breweries. These were typically small operations that catered to a local market. Examples of property types associated with this historic context include farmstead structures (residences and outbuildings), non - farmstead rural structures (churches), river townsite structures (residences, churches, commercial buildings, public buildings, industrial buildings), agricultural processing and storage facilities (mills, breweries, warehouses), and structures associated with river transport. It is logical, therefore, that the next statewide historic context that applies to the development within the present boundaries of Lake Elmo Park Reserve is Agricultural Development and Railroad Construction (1870s-1920s). Minnesota's first train traveled from St. Paul to St. Anthony in June 1862, and the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad reached Fridley in December 1863. "Railroads quickly undermined the [Mississippi] river's importance for transportation..." (Anfinson 2003:157). In less than a decade, railroad construction criss-crossed the State in earnest. According to the State Historic Preservation Office (1985), primary features were the network of railroads and the large-scale production, first of wheat and later of a variety of farm products from diversified farming operations. The typical production unit began as the family farm, developed both by European immigrants and American -born settlers. . „ ,,•. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.8 Chapter Three Cultural Resources Stewardship 0101 , NM, ,I111 1111 41111 I II I All IIIII.,IiI I .1 LI0.,kIl Nall NI INN io.i I I 0.0.11 MAW IliCk lit I 4IIlI WdiIikt0Oililli.ii111601.:4.4t14.11,4,01.10111.116.! YU I Towns were platted by railroad companies or individual entrepreneurs (or a combination) along rail lines to serve as shipping points for agricultural products and as supply -and -service centers. Industries related to the processing of agricultural products developed regionally. Two of the State's most important industrial centers were the flour milling district at St. Anthony Falls in Minneapolis (just downstream from the Fridley Campus) and the meat -packing operations in South St. Paul (State Historic Preservation Office 1985). First railroads, then later trucks, connected local markets with grain elevators and exchanges, processing facilities and warehouses, etc. in the Twin Cities and other large regional centers. Examples of property types associated with this historic context include farmsteads (subsistence level, diversified family farm, and bonanza), non -farmstead rural structures (churches, schools, town halls, etc.), railroad structures (freight and passenger depots, shops and section houses), townsite buildings (residences, commercial buildings, churches, schools, other public buildings), and agricultural facilities for processing, supply, and storage (creameries, breweries, warehouses, grain elevators, terminal elevators, packing and canning facilities, linseed oil and cheese factories, implement and supply dealers and factories, grain exchanges, flour mills). The St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway is depicted on a plat map from Andreas (1874) along the north boundary of Lake Elmo Park Reserve (Figure 2). The period defined by the statewide historic context of Urban Centers (1870-1940 saw a mixed pattern of residential development away from the downtown centers of St. Paul and Minneapolis (Nunnally in Anfinson 2003:173). As urbanization expanded throughout the 20th century, freight railways were dedicated to moving products great distances while streetcars moved people throughout the Twin Cities metropolitan area. Finally, automobiles increasingly defined the urban and suburban landscape after World War R (Nunnally in Anfinson 2003). Expected property types for this historic context include resources related to domestic, commercial, industrial, religious, education, government, and transportation functions (e.g., houses, apartment buildings, shops, processing and manufacturing sites, churches, schools, libraries, city and town halls, other public buildings, freight and passenger depots, shops and section houses, gasoline stations, airports, and other infrastructure). Many of these property types are evident as standing structures in Lake Elmo today, although archaeological features related to former structures are also possible in the Park Reserve. Figure 2, Andreas (1874) Map Washington County & Lake Elmo Park Reserve One early settler near Lake Elmo Park Reserve was Bernard B. "Bun" Cyphers, a Virginian who arrived in the area in 1848. He & his wife, Maria, built a hotel, tavern, and stage stop, known as the "Lake House," near Sunfish Lake. Earlier travelers had reached St. Paul from the St. Croix River Valley via a Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 3.9 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 111 1111 .1 1. , 11.1 1.11 LIP 11 . a. II,Il. 1 1,1 ,111, 1.1 ,i .41 ..11 1, road from Afton and later by one from Stillwater that first crossed Little Canada. The Cyphers moved away, and John Morgan became the first permanent settler near the Park Reserve when, in 1849, he purchased a farm on Stillwater Road, west of Lake Elmo. By 1850 a new road, suitable for stagecoaches — had been constructed from St. Paul to Stillwater.2 Morgan built a spacious hotel known as the "Halfway House," where stagecoaches enroute from St. Paul to Stillwater changed horses and ate meals. Washington County was established on October 27, 1849. Its namesake is George Washington, the first President of the United States. Comprising 423 square miles and including part of the scenic St. Croix River Valley, Washington County was one of the nine original counties created in the Territory of Minnesota,3 Since its establishment, the County has played a diverse role in the region, serving the Twin Cities metropolitan area with its commercial, industtial, natural, and agricultural resources. Washington County experienced modest population growth in the early part of the 20th century. In 1900, the county's population was reported at 27,808 and increased only slightly to 34,544 in 1950. However, Washington County experienced dramatic and rapid population growth during the last half of the 20th century. In 1990, the population had skyrocketed to 145,896 and continued increasing throughout the 1990s at a rate of nearly 38%. The 2002 population estimate for Washington County was 210,724, ranking the County as fifth in population out of the 87 Minnesota counties, While much of Washington County has retained its rural atmosphere, today it is considered a "suburban" county. The two -mile -long water body now known as Lake Elnao4 has played an important part in the development of the Town of Lake Elmo and Washington County. Since the late-1800s, visitors have been drawn to the lake for recreation, relaxation and scenery (Plate 1). Developers for the St. Paul, Stillwater & Taylors Falls Railroad first recognized the recreational potential of Lake Elmo in the early 1870s, By 1880, the railroad company had built a small resort community along the lake's north end, and steamships provided access to distant shores (Plate 2). Large upscale cottages, a hotel, bathhouses, and sailboats attracted wealthy cosmopolitans to Lake Elmo's summer beauty and supply of fish. The most ambitious was the Elmo Residence Park, intended as a year-round community, which was platted in 1884 around the eastern side of the lake by a group of St. Paul 2 This road corresponds roughly to modern Highway 5 & Stillwater Road. 3 Minnesota became a state on May 11, 1858. 4 Early settlers first called it "Bass Lake;" it was renamed in honor of a novel entitled, "Lake Elmo,'' in 1879 by railroad promoter, Alpheus B. Stickney. 44, r J I 9 A .1.31111.1.01SUM1 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment— Washington County 3.10 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship Ai MPH, !ilia' III iii i111. A.6111I ,14 t'... 1, I lehL, .1111 .1111111,11.0 ,136116116 1 doilmol Ii011•161,,641.;l1,111164062016641.1.6111. W6.0164111 A11141 6 businessmen (Goodman 2004). The development was publicized as "a beautiful park & lakeside home suburb near St. Paul" (Plate 3). A community named, "Lake Elmo Village," sprang up around the resort and railroad station. A "Doctor Stevens" established a practice in the village, and years later he founded a private hospital in the village. In 1889, a power house was erected, giving Lake Elmo the first electric lights west of Chicago. By the early 1890s, streetcars were well established and streetcar companies were extending their lines to lakes close to the Twin Cities. During this time, the village included a store, saloon, grain-house,5 blacksmith, and wagon repair shop. By 1900, a cooperative creamery and grain elevator had been added to the village. In 1911 a bank was established, and a consolidated school was built there by 1914. By the 1920s, Stillwater Road had been paved, and the village incorporated in 1925 as a substantial shipping point and dairy center. In subsequent decades, the area retained a bucolic, old-fashioned appeal that drew lake visitors through the 1950s. As residential growth and suburban development proceeded eastward from St. Paul, however, Lake Elmo lost its prominence as an agricultural center. Americans became more reliant on automobile transportation nationwide in the years after World War II, and passenger rail service to Lake Elmo ended in 1963. An ambitious development project of the 1960s known as, "Cimarron," was a planned community of manufactured homes next to a golf course in Lake Elmo. The village was finally converted to a city in 1969, but Lake Elmo has retained some of its peaceful, small town character. Today, Lake Elmo's farmland continues to yield to residential & other developments in all directions. Known & Potential Cultural Resources American Indian Only two archaeological sites have been recorded within the park reserve's boundaries. Site 21 WA0057 was discovered in 1989 during a Phase I archaeological survey for a proposed landfill site on the shores of Eagle Point Lake (Stanley & Hoppin 1989). This small lithic scatter is situated on a landform that archaeologists interpreted as a large dune, The site is only shallowly buried by the dune (i.e., cultural materials in the top 30 cm below the ground surface). Site 21WA0057 yielded a triangular Hixton silicified sandstone projectile point, a jasper flake tool, and cracked rock fragments, and the site's function was identified as a campsite. At the time the investigators completed an official state site form, 5 Apparently this was an early u.i.olzt-aM elevator at which farmers unloaded their wasons directly onto the trains. • Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment —Washington County 3.11 ,11 111.1[11 .11.1 o] Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship LI..1.111 1, i..1.1 .111..11111. 1 J, 1..111111 1111.111,1.1.1..1...IL.. 11.1 „In 111.1 .1111 il the site's eligibility for the NRHP had not yet been formally determined, although the archaeologists recommended 21WA0057 as ineligible for the NRHP. Site 21WA0058 also was discovered in 1989 during the same Phase I archaeological survey at Eagle Point Lake (Stanley & Hoppin 1989), This is an even smaller lithic scatter than 21WA0057. According to the archaeologists, 21WA0058 is located on an interfluve that was carved into a glacial outwash plain. The depth of cultural materials was not recorded on the site form, but note was made that the cracked rock fragments came from only two of the 15 excavated shovel tests. At the time the investigators completed an official state site form, the site's eligibility for the NRHP had not yet been formally determined, although the archaeologists recommended 21WA0058 as ineligible for the NRHP. It appears that no systematic, professional archaeological surveys have been conducted for the management of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. There is high archaeological potential for American Indian archaeological sites throughout the Park Reserve. Particularly the shorelines of Lake Elmo and Eagle Point Lake should be considered high priorities for archaeological surveys. There also is high archaeological potential for American Indian sites around the shores of ponds, present and former, as well as the waterways connecting bodies of surface water. The shorelines of surface water bodies may lack stratigraphic integrity, particularly around Lake Elmo and Eagle Point Lake, because of Euro-American development subsequent to any past American Indian land uses. Euro-American Several historic standing structures (HSS) or HSS complexes are known, but uninventoried, within the Park Reserve. Additionally, there is high archaeological potential for Euro-American archaeological sites within the park's boundaries. Figures 3-8 are plat maps from the 1901, 1916, 1926, 1938, ca. 1948, and ca. 1954, respectively, with the park boundaries superimposed. For 1901, buildings or farmsteads are depicted on lands belonging to H. Hueffmeyer in the center of Section 21; Malting Company in the northwest quarter of Section 22, Frank Morris in the southwest quarter of Section 22; Leonard Labisch and Michael Malone in the northwest quarter of Section 23, and Luther Wier in the northeast quarter of Section 23; School Number 2 and The Iowa Land Company in the southwest quarter of Section 23; C. Malone in the northeast quarter of Section 26; William Frederich in the northeast quarter of Section 27, Robert Shea in the northwest quarter of Section 27, M.P. & D.W. Gray in the southwest quarter of Section 27, and J.Kannar in the southeast quarter of Section 27 (Figure 3). Additionally, a road and the St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway passed through sections 14 & 15, now the north boundary of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Other roads passed roughly north -south, some around the perimeter of what is now the Park Reserve, in several sections: Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.1 2 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship • A road through the center of Section 21. • Another road through the center of the southwest quarter of Section 14, center of the northwest quarter of Section 23, west half of the southwest quarter of Section 23, northwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 26, east half of the northeast quarter of Section 27, and northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 27. School No. 2 was located along this road in the southwest quarter of Section 23. • A road between sections 25 & 26. Other roads passed roughly east -west in several sections, including around the perimeter of the Park Reserve: • A road through the center of Section 27, including along the south tip of Eagle Point Lake. • A road through the southwest quarter of Section 14. • A road in the southwest quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 14. • A road between sections 26 & 35. Land ownership changed through the intervening decades, but the layout of roads, as described above, remained in place until the Park Reserve was established. Plat maps after 1901 show new structures/complexes in some places, whereas some of the older structures/complexes are not illustrated on others. Descriptions are summarized section -by -section in Tables 1-6 and in the following paragraphs. Section 14 If the railroad easement in Section 14 is on Park Reserve property, then the rails and associated structures (e.g., overpass) should be formally evaluated by a federally qualified architectural historian for their eligibility for nomination to the NRHP. If the railroad easement is not the County's responsibility, then no further investigations here would be necessary. Except for the north -south and east -west roads in the southwest quarter of Section 14 (Figures 2-8), no other structures/complexes are shown here on any of the maps (Figures 3-8). Therefore, there is a low probability of historic archaeological deposits. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendmen 01111 In iiiMAL. hedoliwiAldiiiMI.,;UIP Washington County 3.13 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 11111111111111,.11111,11111i 11.11. 111..11in 111111111111111..1111 h.11111111 11111111111 111111 III 1 111 11111 111 11.1111111111111111111111.1111111.11 lIl 11111 I 1311111111 1 III 1 1 111111 1 1 II I Table 1. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from 1901 Plat Map. St. Paul, Minneapolis & Om W.H. Starke A. Schneider St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Joseph Bisch H, Hueffrneyer Frank Morris Malting Company Chris Frederick Joseph Bisch Frank Morris The Iowa Land Company The Iowa Land Company Leonard Labisch Michael Malone F.A. Stevens Lakeview Farm Luther Wier T. & F. Weir The Iowa Land Company School No. 2 C. Malone John Malone Est. John Rawleigh Est. P. Muench Mary Drinane a Railway center of southwest 1/4 Section 14 west % of southwest % Section 14 east 1/2 of southwest 1/4 Section 14 center of southeast 1/4 Section 15 southeast 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 15 and east 1/2 of southeast 1/4 Section 15 south 1/2 of northeast 1/4 Section 21 and west V2 of southeast 1/4 Section 21 east '/2 of southeast quarter Section 21 southwest 1/4 of northwest "A Section 22 southeast 1/4 of northwest 1/4 Section 22 and south V2 of northeast % of northwest 1/4 Section 22 northeast 1/4 Section 22 northwest % of southwest 1/4 Section 22 northeast 1/4 of southwest % Section 22 southeast % Section 22 west 1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 23 east V2 of northwest 1/4 Section 23 north 12 acres in northeast 1/4 Section 23 20 acres? in north V2 of northeast 1/4 Section 23 north '/2 of south 1/2 of northeast % Section 23 south % of south 1/2 of northeast 1/4 Section 23 southeast 1/4 Section 23 and southwest 1/4 Section 23, except for southwest corner of southwest 1/4 Section 23 belonging to school district northeast 1/4 Section 26 58 acres in north 1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 26, except 7.5 acres in southwest "A of north% of northwest 1/4 Section 26 south 1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 26 northwest 'A of southwest % Section 26 northeast 1/4 of southwest 1/4 Section 26 and west V2 of northwest % of southeast 1/4 Section 26 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0 0.5 0.5 0 0 1 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.14 C. Malone William Harbrant William Frederich Robert Shea P.S. M.P. & D.W. Gray J.Kannar E.B. Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship „Oak:01011d I ,11141,14 10# Owl , bl 1010,I444,11,, 1,A10,, 600.01111,001.10,1,11M11,4t,4,10t,,,,A0 ,IIL iWI 0114n I maid 00dIt V4ialo east V2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 26 and northeast 1/4 of southeast 'A Section 26 southeast 1/4 of southwest 1/4 Section 26 northeast % Section 27 northwest 1/4 Section 27, except 2.5 acres in northeast 1/4 of southeast % of northwest 'A Section 25 northeast 1/4 of southwest 1/4 Section 27 and northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 27 northeast % of southeast % Section 27, except 4 acres in northeast 1/4 of northeast % of southeast 1/4 Section 27 east 1/2 of northeast 1/4 Section 28 Table 2. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from 1916 Plat Map. St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway F. Kuehner C. Sonder St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway J.H. Larson J. Bosch C. Sonder H. Hueffmeyer Frank Morris Omaha center of southwest 1/4 Section 14 west V2 of southwest 1/4 Section 14 east I/2 of southwest 1/4 Section 14 & Omaha center of southeast % Section 15 southeast 'A of southeast 1/4 Section 15 east% of southwest 1/4 of southeast % Section 15 north V2 of southeast 1/4 Section 15 south 1/2 of northeast 1/4 Section 21 and west% of southeast 1/4 Section 21 east Y2 of southeast quarter Section 21 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment— Washington County 0 0 1 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 40* vn 3.15 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship IIIII II111111Iq 11111 ,1011 IIll lll111111I1 1111111M1111111111111 111111 111111111 1.111 111 1 11111 11111111111 11111111 I1111111 I I III I 111111 1 111111111 11 1 II 11111 III II 1 1 1111 11 1111111 H 1 1111111 I II IIIII 1111111111 I. 1 11111111l II 1 I 1 11 11111 I 1 IIII 11 I II II III 11111 1 I 1111111111111111 I 1 0111 I 1 I I 1 111 IN 111101 fill 11 III 1 ,156111111111 R.A. Wilkinson C. Frederick Emilie Neitge(?) Joseph Bosch J.H. Larson A,D.S. Johnston E. Riebe M. Malone Theo. Wier et al. F.A.S. [F.A. Stevens?] T.W. [Theo. Wier?] Theo. Wier et al. F.W.? A.D.S. Johnston C. Malone, Jr. J. Malone W. Frederick F. Wendt F. Dominski Mary Drinane Jos. Streiff W. Frederick Robert Shea P.S.? M.P. & D.W. Gray E. Wendt E. & C. Sliney M, Sliney .ytl _ ,j ,'rf southwest'/a of northwest'/a Section 22 west'/z of southeast'/a of northwest % Section 22 east'/2 of southeast'/a of northwest 1/4 Section 22 west'/x of northeast'/a Section 22 east % of northeast'/a Section 22 southeast'/a Section 22 and northeast'/a of southwest'/a Section 22 west'/z of northwest'/a Section 23 east % of northwest'/4 Section 23 north' of northeast'/4 Section 23, except north 10 acres in northwest'/a of northeast'/a Section 23 and 10 acres in northwest'/a of northeast'/a Section 23 south V2 of northeast % Section 23, except 10 acres? in south'/x of south / of northeast'/ Section 23 south Section 23 northeast'/a Section 26 and northeast'/a of southeast' Section 26 and east'/z of northeast'/a of northwest'/a Section 26 59 acres in north' of northwest'/a Section 26, except for 7.5 acres in southwest'/a of north'/2 of northwest'/a Section 26 south/ of northwest'/a Section 26 northwest'/a of southwest 1/4 Section 26 northeast'/a of southwest'/a Section 26 and west'/2 of northwest'/4 of southeast'/4 Section 26 southeast'/a of southwest '/a Section 26 northeast'/a Section 27 northwest'/a Section 27, except 2.5 acres in northeast'/a of southeast'/a of northwest'/a Section 25 northeast '/a of southwest '/a Section 27 and northwest '/a of southeast '/a Section 27 northeast'/a of southeast'/a Section 27 east'/2 of northeast'/a Section 28 west '/2 of northeast'/a Section 28 010 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3.16 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship ulJ,llllI i,illi1154iJldYJk In :b&IIIII,.ul11:1 I'P, 41:I41101Aiul!YnY! d:hii .: .r I:., II, Ihmhl a.'Ii JIIGIIIi I II IN i4I I ,oil 4411,4W:um FL. LAW Wm...T1:1:11llivala!u , W161iIIII::il1A1140.110 II I,.IlLam lul4a',---nibiia—gaili.J.� . ,:...,.:.:. aie Table 3. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from 1926 Plat Map. St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway F. Kuehner A. Larson Cord Sander. St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway Jno. H. Larson Frank Bosch, Jr. Cord Sander Michael Raleigh Jno. Morris R.A. Wilkinson Emil Nialge Frank Bosch, Jr. Jno.H, Larson Hauser & Son Malting Co. Jno. Morris ?Jno. Morris? Ernest Reibe Michael Malone D.T. Wier et al. S. Shepard Hauser & Son Malting Co. School Omaha center of southwest'/a Section 14 west '/2 of southwest '/a Section 14, except for 20 acres in south % of southwest % of.southwest '/a Section 14 southeast IA of southwest'/ Section 14 & Omaha center of southeast'/a Section 15 southeast'/a of southeast'/a Section 15 east'/z of southwest '/a of southeast'/a Section 15 north'/z of southeast IA Section 15 south 1/2 of northeast'/a Section 21 and west'/z of southeast'/a Section 21 east % of southeast quarter Section 21 southwest'/a of northwest'/a Section 22 east' of northwest'/a Section 22 west 1 of northeast % Section 22 east'/x of northeast IA Section 22 southeast IA Section 22 south' of southwest'/a Section 22 and northwest'/a of southwest % Section 22 northeast'/a of southwest'/a Section 22 west 1 of northwest % Section 23 east'/2 of northwest'/a Section 23 northeast '/a Section 23, except for north 22? acres in northwest'/a of nottheast'/a Section 23 south Section 23, except for southwest corner of Section 23 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 5 0 9 1 pnw.:......:....:..... e..:,., ..: .:... le... .::..ea .3•,•+n w. a.,lsl®a Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment— Washington County 3.17 IIII 1111111111i IIIIiIIY IIII IIYIII IlpYllll11111111111111111, 111 in' IA lV II IIIII III III., 11 III IIIIII IIIIIILIII II II C. Malone, Jr. Jno. Malone W. Frederick F. Wendt R.S. Brickley Mary Drinane Jos. Streiff Wm. Frederich Mary Shea W.L. & Roy Dalton Eliz. & Cath. Sliney Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship IIIIII 1111 101111II 11111111 IIIII 11111 II 1 111I11 11111111 111111 1 1111111I111III 1111 northeast'/a Section 26 and east 1/2 of northeast'/a of northwest 6 1/4 Section 26 and east 1/2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast % Section 26 and northeast % of southeast 1/4 Section 26 59 acres in north 1/2 of northwest % Section 26, except for 0 east V2 of northeast '/a of northwest '/a Section 26 (C. Malone, 0 Jr.) and 7.5 acres in southwest '/a of north 1/2 of northwest % 0 Section 26 0 south 1/2 of northwest 1/ Section 26 0 northwest % of southwest 1/4 Section 26 0 northeast % of southwest % Section 26 and 0 west 1/2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast'/a Section 26 0 southeast'/a of southwest'/a Section 26 northeast 1/4 Section 27 northwest' Section 27 north 1/2 of southwest 1/4 Section 27 and north 1/2 of southeast 1/4 Section 27 east 1/2 of northeast 1/a Section 28 iItiT-'1926 PLAT Table 4. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from 1938 Plat Map. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha center of southwest'/a Section 14 Railway west 1/2 of southwest % Section 14, except for Fred Kuehner 20 acres in south 1/2 of southwest'/a of southwest 1/4 Section 14 A. Larson southeast 1/a of southwest'/a Section 14 Wm. Sander St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha center of southeast'/a Section 15 Railway southeast 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 15 Jno. H. Larson southwest % of southeast'/a Section 15 Frank Bosch, Jr. north 1/2 of southeast '/a Section 15 Cord Sander Michael Raleigh Jno. Morris E.R. Beutel south 1/2 of northeast'/a Section 21 and west 1/2 of southeast 1/ Section 21 east 1/2 of southeast quarter Section 21 southwest'/a of northwest'/a Section 22 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment —Washington Coon 11 5 0 4 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Emil Nialge Freda Bosch et al. Jno.H, Larson Hauser & Son Malting Co. Jno, Morris ?Hauser & Son Malting Co.? Ernest Reibe Thos. J. Malone et al. Theo. Wier et al. S. Shepard Hauser & Son Malting Co. School C. Malone, Jr. Jno. Malone ?AY.? Otto Naatz C. Ritter Jennie Drinane Jos. Streiff Amanda Frederich Mary Shea Roy Dalton John Dalton Eliz. & Cath.TO Slue Chapter Three — Cultural Resources Stewardship east 1/2 of northwest 1/ Section 22 west'/z of northeast 'Aa Section 22 east'/z of northeast 1/a Section 22 southeast 1A Section 22 south 1/2 of southwest 'A Section 22 and northwest'/a of southwest 'A Section 22 northeast'/a of southwest'/4 Section 22 west %x of northwest 'A Section 23 east 1/2 of northwest'/a Section 23 northeast 1/4 Section 23, except for north 22? acres in northwest 1/4 of northeast 1/4 Section 23 south 1/x Section 23, except for southwest corner of Section 23 0 0 0 3 1 0 2 0 0 5 0 9 1 northeast 1/4 Section 26 and east 1/2 of northeast 'A of northwest 6 'A Section 26 and east V2 of northwest'/4 of southeast 1A Section 26 and northeast 'A of southeast'/a Section 26 59 acres in north'/z of northwest'/a Section 26, except for 0 east 1 of northeast 1/ of northwest 'A Section 26 (C. Malone, 0 Jr.) and 7.5 acres in southwest 1/4 of north 1/z of. northwest 1A 0 Section 26 0 south'/z of northwest'A Section 26 0 northwest 'A of southwest 'A Section 26 0 northeast 1A of southwest'/a Section 26 and 0 west 1/2 of northwest 'A of southeast 'Aa Section 26 0 southeast 1/4 of southwest 'Aa Section 26 northeast 'A Section 27 14 northwest 1/4 Section 27 3 north 1 of southeast 1/4 Section 27, except for northeast corner 4 of northeast 1/4 of southeast 'A Section 27 north V2 of southwest 'A Section 27 0 east 1/2 of northeast 1A Section 28 0 CTEDON493:8°PL;AT>MAP:: ' 50 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment-- Washington County „1...111 1.11.11,11 I ,.III! 1111111111d 11. 1111 11111111111111 1111111111111111111111111. 111111111 1111,1111 111 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 11,101 1111 111 Ills .IIIII IIII, 1111 III 1 10111111111111001111111111IIIIIII II I1111111 I111I III 10 Om III 11 10 III II II III 111YI 1 10 III 111i III 1111111II III IIIW II 11 11 lid Y W 1 W1Wi1 11YIY lit 11111 Mil Table 5. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from ca. 1948 Plat Map. Paul, Minneapolis Railway W. & F. Sanders A, & W. Larson St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway A. & W. Larson ?F. Sch.? J. Sander V. & L. Raleigh Omaha center of southwest 1/4 Section 14 east '/z of southwest 1/4 Section 14 southwest 1/4 of southwest 1/4 Section 14 & Omaha center of southeast 'A Section 15 southeast 1/ of southeast 1/4 Section 15 southwest 1/4 of southeast'/a Section 15 north'/z of southeast 1/4 Section 15 J. Morris ?City of Oakdale? I. & F. Friedrich ?F. Sch.? A. & W. Larson Hauser & Sons Eagle Point Lake Malting Co. J. Morris A. Riebe et al. M. Malone et al. W. Riebe Hauser & Sons Eagle Point Lake Malting Co. W. Schwartz W. Carmody Otto Naatz H. & K. Brown J. Drinane south'/z of northeast 1/4 Section 21 and west'/z of southeast 1/4 Section 21 east 1 of southeast quarter Section 21 northwest 'A Section 22, except for 40 acres in east'/z of northwest 1/4 Section 22 west 1/2 of northeast 1/4 Section 22 east'/z of northeast 1/a Section 22 southeast 1/4 Section 22 and northeast 1A of southwest 1/4 Section 22 southwest 1/4 Section 22, except for northeast 1/ of southwest 1 Section 22 (Hauser & Sons) west 1 of northwest IA Section 23 east Vz of northwest 1/4 Section 23 northeast 1/4 Section 23 south 1/2 Section 23 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 northeast 1/ Section 26 and east 1/2 of northeast 1/4 of northwest 0 1/4 Section 26 and east V2 of northwest 'A of southeast 1/4 Section 26 and northeast r/ of southeast' Section 26 60 acres in north .1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 26 2 south'/z of northwest' Section 26 1 northwest '/a of southwest 1/4 Section 26 0 northeast 1/4 of southwest 1/4 Section 26 and 0 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County •20 a & D, Warner E.J. Schiltgen ?M. & E. Falteisek? Roy Dalton J. Dalton K. Sliney et al. Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 4 lua Akinii.01.441Wii,11.4,oiVol.,A116.M.Y44.0407,6./441M141Alowl.whashi...i41.04ilowmoi west 1/2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 26 southeast% of southwest 'A Section 26 north% Section 27, except for east 1/2 of northeast Vi Section 27 north 1/2 of southeast % Section 27 north 1/2 of southwest "A Section 27 east V2 of northeast 'A Section 28 . . Table 6. Summary of Landowners with Buildings &/or Farmsteads from ca. 1954 Plat Map. • Landownerl St. Paul, Minneapolis Railway W.J. Sander Arthur C. & Walter A. Larson St. Paul, Minneapolis & Railway Arthur C. & Walter A, Larson John H. Sanders Leo & Veronica A. Raleigh Wm. F. Poppengberger City of Oakdale and others Friedrich Arthur C. & Walter A. Larson Wm, F. Poppengberger William Riebe et al. Mary R. Malone et al. William H. Riebe Wm. F. Poppengberger Omaha center of southwest 'A Section 14 southeast 'A of southwest Va Section 14 southwest 1/4 of southwest % Section 14 Omaha center of southeast 'A Section 15 almost entire south 1/2 of southeast 1/4 Section 15 north 1/2 of southeast 'A Section 15 south V2 of northeast 'A Section 21 and west V2 of southeast 1/4 Section 21 east 1/2 of southeast quarter Section 21 northwest 1/4 Section 22, except for 42 acres in east V2 of northwest 1/4 Section 22 northeast 'A Section 22 south V2 Section 22 west 1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 23 east 1/2 of northwest 1/4 Section 23 northeast 'A Section 23 south V2 Section 23 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment Washington County 0 1 1 0 0 0 113 1 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 several 0 0 1 3 4 1+? 0 3.21 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship .1111111. 111 1.111 11111111111 !, 111111111 11111111111111111111111 1111111 III 11111 1111111111111111111 111111111 11111111111111110 1 111111 11111 1111111 101111111111111111 111111 111 1111, 1 11111 11111111 III 111111111111111 1 11 11111111111 11 11 11 111 111 111 1il1111 11 id Ilihp ihIliIh11 io illi111 1111111 W. Schwartz Wm. F. Carmody Harold & Frances Toensing and others Keyran O'Brien H.J. & K.P. Brown G.A. & D.M. Warner William H. Schwartz E.J. Schiltgen various owners Roy Dalton James Dalton Catherine A. Sliney et al. llII II northeast 'A Section 26 and east 1/2 of northeast 1/4 of northwest 0 'A Section 26 and east Y2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 26 and northeast "Aof southeast 1/4 Section 26 most of northwest 1/4 of northwest 'A Section 26, small tracts with various owners south Y2 of northwest 1/4 Section 26 north V2 of southwest 1/4 Section 26 and west '/2 of northwest 1/4 of southeast 1/4 Section 26 southeast 'A of southwest i/4 Section 26 north 1/2 of southeast 'A Section 26 northwest '4 Section 27 northeast 'A Section 27 north 1/2 of southeast 1/4 Section 27 north 1/2 of southwest "A Section 27 east V2 of northeast 1/4 Section 28 except for 10 8 7 10 0 4 0 6 12+? 0 0 0 72+ Section 15 If the railroad easement in Sections 15 is on Park Reserve property, then the rails and associated structures (e.g., overpass) should be formally evaluated by a federally qualified architectural historian for their eligibility for nomination to the NRHP. If the railroad easement is not the County's responsibility, then no further investigations here would be necessary. No other structures/complexes are shown the maps in the south half of the southeast quarter of Section 15 until ca. 1948 when a structure/complex is indicated on land owned by A. & W. Larson (Figures 3-7). Two structures are indicated in this same location on the 1954 plat map when the land was owned by John H. Sanders (Figure 8). This is the location of the "North Farmstead" (Plate 4). There is a high probability of historic archaeological deposits here, but stratigraphic integrity may have been compromised by agricultural activities. Therefore, any historic archaeological site(s) here may be ineligible for nomination to the NRHP. Section 21 The structure/complex in the southwest corner of the northwest quarter of Section 21 is first shown on the 1901 plat map (Figure 3), but it was not depicted on other plat maps until two structures are indicated on the ca. 1954 plat map (Figure 8). This complex has been razed and no structural remnants were readily apparent during the Master Plan team's site visit in May 2005. According to Lake Elmo Park Reserve staff, a well associated with one of the former structures, presumably a farmhouse, was removed in 2004. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.22 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship AdddIddir,,,AdddliddidgiLLIII0d,ddliddidani,Aidi I id lulu ijI!, 11 IIjIvI lq,Ali IIIilIi 5 I J. AI 11.• 4.6101.kg.d1 imalLiddik.d Owl lin IIdoW.14Liludik6. diLLJAILLIAI 1,,MALAIJ.1.1 !Oil; L 1111Lkdd Some archaeological potential still remains at this location, although stratigraphic integrity has likely been compromised to such degree that any historic archaeological site in this location would likely be ineligible for nomination to the NRHP. Section 22 The structure/complex illustrated on the 1901 plat map (Figure 3) in the southwest quarter of the northwest quarter of Section 22 is also shown in that location on the ca. 1948 and ca. 1954 maps (Figures 7 & 8). This location may correspond to the approximate location of the razed triplex dwelling north of Eagle Point Lake (Plate 5). Some potential may exist here for historic archaeological materials. Lake Elmo Park Reserve staff did not describe any former structures/complex on the parcel in the southwest quarter of Section 22, close to the north tip of Eagle Point Lake (Figure 3). It should be noted that a structure/complex is depicted on the ca. 1948 and ca. 1954 plat maps (Figures 7 & 8), but no other historic maps, According to the ca. 1948 map, a road or long driveway may have provided access to this structure/complex (Figure 7). However, the structure/complex apparently has been razed and no structural remnants were readily apparent during the Master Plan team's site visit in May 2005. However, this location may have the potential to yield significant historic archaeological materials, and any future archaeological survey in the Park Reserve should address this possibility by attempting to find structural remnants and subsurface artifacts in the north half of the southwest quarter of Section 22. Section 23 hi addition to the early road through the west half of this section (Figure 2), structures/complexes in the northwest quarter of Section 23 are shown on the 1901 plat map (Figure 3) as well as the ca. 1948 and ca. 1954 maps (Figures 7 & 8). These structures or farm complexes would have been in the vicinity of what is now "Family Picnic" on the Park Reserve's base map. Despite the fact that the structures appear to have been razed after ca. 1954, future archaeological surveys in the Park Reserve should address the possibility of structural remnants and historic archaeological deposits in this part of Section 23. In 1901 Luther Wier may have owned the structure/complex called "Lake View Farm" in the northeast quarter of Section 23 (Figure 3). This structure/complex may already have been quite old by 1901 since a structure/complex is shown in approximately the same location on the 1874 map (Figure 2). By 1926 the land had been transferred to D.T. Wier et al. with an additional complex also standing nearby (Figure 5). According to Lake Elmo Park Reserve staff, a barn from the northeast quarter of this section was moved from this vicinity to the "North Farmstead," (see Section 15 discussion above). Therefore, any future archaeological survey in the Park Reserve should address the possibility of historic archaeological deposits left behind in the northeast quarter of Section 23. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 3.23 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 1111 lIIlIiI 1111111111111111 111111 1111111111111 1111 1111110 II III IMO 1 ili1111111011 Ili II 1111111 111111111 11111 H11111111 1101111 111111111ili 111111111111 1111111111111111111d 1 111111111 1111 11 11111111 1 1 111111 1 1111111111111111111101 1 1 1 Ili 0111,111 hill 1141.11ENINIIIIMMIMIN Another structure/complex is depicted on property owned by The Iowa Land Company in 1901 in the southwest quarter of Section 23 (Figure 3). It appears to have remained in that location through ca. 1948 and ca. 1954 (Figures 7 & 8). This structure or complex is located in the near vicinity of "Modern Camping (30 spaces)" as depicted on the Park Reserve's base map. A modern bridge/overflow structure is present near the former location of the structure/complex in the southwest quarter of Section 23 (Plate 6). School No. 2 is shown in the far southwest comer of Section 23 in the 1901 (Figure 3). It also is depicted on the 1926 and 1938 plat maps (Figures 5 & 6), However, this structure is not identified on subsequent plat maps. This former school may have been located immediately south of the present-day "Group Camping" sites. It is not known whether the school was demolished on -site or moved to another location. Any future archaeological survey in the Park Reserve should address the possibility of structural remnants & historic archaeological deposits left in these portions of the southwest quarter of Section 23. It should be noted, however, that the integrity of any archaeological deposits here, if present, may have been sacrificed during subsequent development here. For instance, another modern bridge is present near the former location of the school. Structures/complexes were first illustrated in the southeast quarter of section 23 on the 1926 plat map (Figure 5). These structures/complexes apparently remained in this quarter -section through at least 1938 (Figure 6), but no structures/complexes are depicted in those locations on subsequent maps (Figures 7 & 8). Any future archaeological survey in the Park Reserve should address the possibility of structural remnants & historic archaeological deposits left in these portions of the southeast quarter of Section 23. Section 26 The northeast quarter of Section 26 once included at least two structures or complexes when the property was owned by C. Malone in 1901 (Figure 3). These structures/complexes remained here at least through 1938 (Figures 5 & 6), and at least the easternmost structure/complex may have survived through ca. 1954 (Figure 8), if not longer. According to Park Reserve staff, at least one of these structures/complexes, if not both, was razed sometime in the past. The Sanders Wacker Bergly team was not able to visit the northeast quarter of Section 26 during the site visit with Park Reserve staff in May 2005, However, some potential may exist here for structural remnants & historic archaeological materials. Three structures/complexes are illustrated on the ca. 1948 map for the northwest quarter of Section 26 (Figure 7), and may are shown on the ca. 1954 plat map (Figure 8), These structures/complexes were distributed throughout the area labeled "Prairie Restoration" between the south tip of Lake Elmo and 1141 .1 I I I I. II I I J 4 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.24 ,,,0114.001.6110,11.160olliailAglioak14,11411.14.110/41411664441.4411.11,14i.ALI.L16411.106.1,k4 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship Brown's Pond. One of the sites includes the "Red Barn." Today one barn & silo are still extant - other structures were razed, but a wellhead was seen during the Sanders Wacker Bergly team visit with Park Reserve staff in May (Plate 7). There is high potential here for structural remnants & historic archaeological materials. One structure/complex is shown on the 1901 plat map in the southeast quarter of the southwest quarter of Section 26 (Figure 3). A complex of standing structures is shown in this location on the ca. 1948 and ca. 1954 maps (Figures 7 & 8). The Sanders Wacker Bergly team did not visit this location in May 2005 nor did Park Reserve staff provide any details about the land -use history here. Some potential may exist here for structural remnants & historic archaeological materials, so any future archaeological survey should address this possibility. Section 27 One structure/complex is illustrated on the 1901 map on the west side of an early road on the section line between sections 26 & 27 (Figure 3). This road was in place at least as early as 1874 (Figure 2). By 1926, many additional structures had been added at this location and throughout the northeast quarter of the northeast quarter of Section 27 (Figures 5, 6 & 8). This likely is where former lake -cottage complexes stood overlooking the south half of Eagle Point Lake. Only a former garage from one of them is still standing (on the east shore). Plate 8 shows the adaptive reuse of this garage — the Park Reserve now uses it as Ski Shelter #1. Some potential may exist at the site of this former lake -cottage complex, as well as at other locations in the northeast quarter of Section 27. Historic archaeological materials may be present, although the likelihood of stratigraphic integrity is slim, and the age of the archaeological materials, if present, may be historically insignificant (i.e., less than 50 years old). The south tip of Eagle Point Lake is also the location of at least one former structure/complex. A structure/complex is shown on the 1901, 1926, and 1938 plat maps in the northeast quarter of the southeast quarter of Section 27 (Figures 3, 5 & 6)._ However, by the time R. Dalton took possession of the land by ca. 1948, that structure/complex appears to have been removed (Figure 7). Park Reserve staff did acknowledge this as the site of "former houses," but no structural remnants were evident during the team's site visit in May 2005. Some potential also may exist here for historic archaeological materials, although the likelihood of stratigraphic integrity is slim. In 1901 M.P. & D.W. Gray owned a structure/complex on land in the northeast corner of the southwest quarter of Section 27 (Figure 3). However, no structures/complexes are shown at this location on subsequent plat maps (Figures 4-8). Some potential also may exist here for historic archaeological materials, although the likelihood of stratigraphic integrity is very slim. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 3.26 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 111..11111111I. i 11111 I I 11 I II 1 .1111 .1 I III 11111111 I . III. 1 11 1111111 1111 I . 111111 11, ill I I II II I ,111. I 1111111...1 1 111111 1 III II . 1 .1 1.1. I I I 1 111 . .11 I .1 11111 I 1 II 1 II 1 1 11 11111 .1 1 I II 11111111, 1111 I 1 11 III 1 11 1 1 11 11 11111 11 1 11 11 II I 111 11 J I 10 Ol 11 111 o, .1 . In addition to the structures/complexes described above, an east -west road is shown through the center of Section 27 as early as 1874 (Figure 2). It should be noted that any Park Reserve roads that now overlie this early road, as well as the north -south road through sections 14, 23 & 26 (Figure 3), may cap and thus preserve remnants of these historic roads, Park Reserve staff should be cautious in these areas if future regrading of subsurfaces is planned for roads in any of these locations. Coordination with the SHP° may be warranted in advance of such earth -moving activities. A structure/complex is illustrated when Robert Shea owned land in 1901 in the northwest quarter of Section 27 on the west side of Eagle Point Lake (Figure 3). By 1926 the land had been transferred to Mary Shea with two structures listed on the plat map (Figure 5). It appears this complex was transferred to E.J. Schiltgen by 1948 (Figure 7), and by ca. 1954 six structures are shown at this location on the map (Figure 8). Park Reserve staff presently refer to this location as the "Schiltgen Farm," However, all that remains at this location today is a silo and pole barn (Plate 9). A ski shelter built on -site is Ski Shelter #2 for the purposes of this report. Possible cellar depressions and soil berms were observed during the Sanders Wacker Bergly team's visit in May 2005. Therefore, some potential may exist here for historic archaeological materials. Like the other former cultural resources in Section 27, there is a slim likelihood that historic archaeological deposits, if present here, retain any stratigraphic integrity. Section 28 No structures/complexes are illustrated in the project area portion of the northeast quarter of Section 28 on any of the historic maps examined for this project. Consequently, this part of the project area is recommended as having low potential for significant historic archaeological materials. Infrastructure Throughout the Park Reserve In addition to landscape modifications caused by Euro-American settlement & farming in what is now Lake Elmo Park Reserve, it should be noted that construction of infrastructure by the County may have inadvertently damaged Pre -Contact archaeological deposits, Contact Period and Post -Contact archaeological sites, including archaeological deposits associated with HSS. For instance, the bridge/overflow on the east side of Eagle Point Lake (Plate 6) is situated in a location that is highly sensitive for American Indian cultural materials. However, construction of the bridge/overflow may have disturbed archaeological deposits, if present. Figure 9 shows the locations of HSS at the time of the Master Plan for the Park Reserve (Brauer & Associates 1978). Many of the HSS standing in 1978 are also visible on the 1947 aerial photograph available for the area within the Park Reserve's exterior boundaries. Most of the HSS were razed long ago, although there is still some archaeological potential in many of the locations (see section -by -section A 11 1111611111111161110114 111 ol 41.11.1 WO Po ho I e ... Lake Elmo Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3,26 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship ,:141 1,1111140 I .idli114104.4t )IjIfl.Alla h. I .11 Lik AS,e4Atio Ai. ,1111.1.11,61.!LAI.ti 1041.1: ,i111411,0G.4 1,11.5a6.11 i11111111..0144.4Limm soda' 11,1ildidli.iud 011411.41111111, iI J ILIiIIIiIC, 1,11111mi, discussions above). Figure 10 is an overlay of the HSS information (from the 1947 aerial photo and the 1978 map) on a map presented by the Sanders Wacker Bergly team for initial design ideas for the Master Plan Update,6 In addition to the previous and extant HSS and roads, there are numerous earthen erosion -control structures throughout the Park Reserve (Plate 10). According to Park Reserve staff, the structure shown in Plate 10 impounds water from the City of Oakdale then releases it into Eagle Point Lake. Park Reserve staff estimated this structure is approximately 20 years old, and they told the Sanders Wacker Bergly team there are approximately seven such structures throughout the Park Reserve. No construction dates were readily available, but these structures may date to the late 1970s. Because of their assumed young age, the erosion -control structures are likely ineligible for nomination to the NRHP as historically significant. It should be noted, however, that construction of these monumental features may have disturbed archaeological deposits, if present. Archaeological Sensitivity Models Some of the earliest professional efforts at recording archaeological sites in Minnesota were undertaken by Jacob V. Brower, Alfred J. Hill, and Theodore H. Lewis in the late 1800s and by Newton H. Winchell in the early 1900s. Their reports provide the earliest records of American Indian mound sites prior to extensive disturbance by Euro-American settlers, farmers, and industrialists. Although much of their work entailed exhaustive field verification of sites, a great deal of data was derived from informant interviews rather than actual field surveys. In subsequent years, only two archaeological sites have been recorded from within the Park Reserve. No systematic, professional surveys have been conducted. This lack of information underscores the importance of predictive modeling with respect to locations of low sensitivity (lowest likelihood), medium sensitivity (more likely), and high sensitivity (highest likelihood) for archaeological resources. Sensitivity models, in short, are used as aid in the planning process for new development or redevelopment on a particular land parcel. Yet it is important to keep in mind that the dependability of a predictive model for a particular location can only be evaluated through comparison to archaeological field results there (ground-truthing). 6 Note that the 1938 plat map (Figure 6) shows many more-structures/complexes around Eagle Point Lake and Lake Elmo than are depicted on Figures 9 & 10. The County and Park Reserve staff may also want to consider the locations of previous lake cottages/complexes when planning future development and possible impacts to archaeological Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 3.27 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 11111.111111 111111 1 11 11111111111111 1,11 1 1111110,11 11111111 11111 ,1 Ill 111111 11111 Hill 110111111111111111111! 111111 111 III 111111111111110111 11 lil 1,11 111111 1 11111111111 1111111 11111 ill 111111111111 11111111111110111 11 11111111111 IhIIi 1 II 11111 I 1111 III 1111111111111111111,111 1,111 11 11 1 II 1 Hill Lake E Mn/Model is a suite of GIS-based statistical models that map the potential for pre-1837 surface archaeological sites in Minnesota. The first phases of Mn/Model development occurred over a number of years.7 The following information is quoted directly from Mn/DOT's website: Mn/Model development began in 1995. The goal of the project was to use Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and statistical analysis to produce archaeological predictive models that could be replicated by anyone using the same data and following the same procedures. The aim was that these models be accurate enough to predict 85% of known archaeological sites without designating more than 33% of the state's area as high and medium site probability. The Phase 2 models, completed in 1997, achieved this goal. The Phase 3 models exceeded it.8 Information about Mn/Model's phased development is paraphrased here from Mn/DOT' s website. Phase 1 was defined as "Basic Data Accumulation and Prototype Model Development." The data were collected through a combination of background research, archaeological field work, geomorphological methods, and archaeological database development. Digitized archaeological site information was used for the database development. The end -products of this phase of the project were prototype GIS models for five archaeological resource regions (i.e., environmental regions based on the State's surface hydrology). Phase 2 involved "Formal Model Development." Goals of this phase were to add additional archaeological and environmental data to the GIS database, to refine modeling techniques, to extend modeling to the entire state, and to develop information on major river valley sediments and the paleoclimate of Minnesota. Introducing the fourth dimension (time) into the model also was attempted through radiocarbon dating of samples. The final phase of development was "Model Refinement and Implementation" (Phase 3), Major tasks for this phase were the development of a model of suitable pre -Woodland habitats for predicting locations of very old or buried sites, testing the geomorphic models with archaeological data, and enhancing the statewide predictive model with additional data and refinements. At this stage, the preliminary Phase 2 7 The Mn/Model process and the resulting data models are copyrighted by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnJDOT). This state agency received significant funding from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) for the Mn/Model process. 8 Information available at htto://www.mnmodel.dot.state.m.us/index.html. o Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment Washington County 3.2 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship ' t1.14..WWW0libtiolvkalafisideiviiintlea.0," Whailial....14111i4m..111.611146,10 models also were applied to specific archaeological projects to begin planning for the implementation of Mn/Model. As described in a previous section of this report, nine archaeological regions have been proposed for the State of Minnesota (Anfinson 1990). In this classification system, the Park Reserve lies within the "Region 4: Central Deciduous Lakes Region." Region 4 has more documented burial mounds than any of the other eight regions (Anfinson 1990). Furthermore, Anfinson (1990:156) predicts that [m]ost base camps should be on major lakes, especially where stream inlets or outlets foster seasonal increased fish populations or wild rice beds. Temporary camps should be near any surface water source. Subsistence resource procurement sites can also be anywhere depending on the resource sought. Mound sites should be near base camps on elevated terraces or hills. Mn/Model information was not considered during the creation of the following sensitivity models for the Park Reserve, but Washington County might consider requesting Mn/Model output for the Park Reserve. It should be noted, however, that sensitivity models should be treated as dynamic tools. That is, as more is learned by engineers and planners about the subsurface in the Park Reserve, then the models should be updated accordingly. For instance, observational data collected prior to and during construction of new park features should be scrutinized for information that could be useful for updating the models for the Park Reserve. Pre -Contact & Contact Period Archaeological Sensitivity Models for the Park Reserve Archaeological research and cultural resources management studies in the general region have resulted in the identification of archaeological sites affiliated with the pre -contact and contact periods. Sites already recorded in Washington County include habitation and mound/mortuary sites, lithic and artifact scatters, lithic and artifact findspots, trading post(s), mill(s), and ghost towns. These inventories are updated frequently as new sites are discovered and previously recorded sites are revisited. Figure 11 summarizes the archaeological sensitivity for pre -contact and contact period sites in the Park Reserve. Post -Contact Archaeological Sensitivity Models for the Park Reserve Archaeological research and cultural resources management studies in the general region have resulted in the identification of archaeological sites affiliated with the post -contact period. These sites include cemetery/mortuary sites, artifact scatters and findspots, trading post(s), mill(s), and ghost towns. Like the inventories for the pre -contact and contact period sites, the inventory for post -contact archaeological sites is updated frequently as new sites are discovered and previously recorded sites are revisited. Figure 12 summarizes the archaeological sensitivity for post -contact period sites in the Park Reserve. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.29 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 11111111111•111ffillIMIlliIlIlIlIlIlilIlIl hi NISEI ao Ion 111111110111111111111111111111111 1111111h 111111111111 II II NM.. II, II I 1111 111111. III 101 101 I II III 1111 1 II 1.1 11111. II I1 Ill AI 1 11..111111...111[1. 1.I. 1.I. 11_1111 I.,. 1.1 1-111111.111.L1, III, I. I I 1 ..11111.11 Recommendations It should be emphasized that Lake Elmo Park Reserve possesses numerous areas with medium to high potential for American Indian and Euro-American archaeological sites and structural remnants. In addition, several HSS and complexes remain within the Park Reserve's boundaries. For these reasons, the following management recommendations can be made: (1) Complete archaeological surveys in association with proposed development projects or complete a comprehensive survey(s) throughout the Park Reserve, Such surveys will be coordinated with the State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) in compliance with the Minnesota Historic Sites Act, Surveys for American Indian and Euro-American sites and structural remnants should be completed by qualified archaeologists. (2) Document newly identified archaeological sites & keep updating archaeological site forms. Each newly identified archaeological site will be documented on an official Minnesota Archaeological Site Form and submitted to the Office of the State Archaeologist (OSA). If additional information is received or if additional work is completed at 21WA0057 & 21WA0058, their archaeological site forms be updated (see #3 below). Under the Minnesota Private Cemeteries Act, the Park Reserve will inform the OSA, if human burials are identified during the archaeological survey(s) or inadvertently encountered during future construction projects. (3) Complete formal evaluation of archaeological sites that are potentially eligible for nomination to the NRHP. Any newly identified archaeological resources should be subjected to formal evaluation for their eligibility for nomination to the NRHP. Following this same rationale, the County should make a formal request to the SHPO in regard to the eligibility determination for sites 21WA0057 & 21WA0058. (4) Revise & update the Park Reserve's archaeological sensitivity models, As more is learned about the Park Reserve's archaeological resources, the archaeological sensitivity models submitted with this updated Master Plan shall be revised periodically by a qualified archaeologist, (5) Complete a comprehensive survey of historic standing structures(HSS) throughout the Park Reserve, Survey should be completed by qualified architectural historians. Inventory forms should be submitted to the SHPO for entry into the State's HSS database. 16111 to .11 I., • I =MOM, 4 1 1 it Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.30 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship fy, IIIiNli1111.11 d11.10i*MiIII I01mWNlimill,k1I6 JM,1lll!.i Illl llf 69{gAI C414014.4,, lil.!..11W 1114441I0INiablillli.l Ail n11.i't6L11I1. AO II1AIII IJI,Y§WI:II lAU, xl. »haiIIi,iCl„iI 1111111111141 tl!uVfIIONIII IbiLild RLYI+w IIYIIII141111IWuflAlul;6x Ill III III IPIIIIf III! I,I.ILIk{III (6) Evaluate any HSS that are potentially eligible for the NRHP. Any HSS potentially eligible for the NRHP should be subjected to formal evaluation for their eligibility for nomination to the NRHP. (7) Future developments within the Park Reserve should be coordinated through the SHPO in compliance with the Minnesota Historic Sites Act. If Federal funding is obtained for any future developments (e.g., IS'1xEA from the U.S. Department of Transportation) or if the Park Reserve receives any Federal permits (e.g., 404 Permit from the U.S. Aiiny Corps of Engineers), then the Park Reserve will coordinate with the SHPO in compliance with the National Historic Preservation Act (NHPA). (8) Mitigate adverse effects to historic properties within Lake Elmo Park Reserve. If any historic properties are identified within the Park Reserve (i.e., archaeological sites or HSS that are determined to be eligible for the NRHP), then appropriate mitigative measures will be coordinated with the SHPO prior to any adverse impacts that would result from future development. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.31 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship .1 li 11111111111 11111 lIlIi 111111111111111 IIIIli 11 011111111M ilill 111 1 1111 11 111111, 11111,11111011111 III 1111 111111111111l 11 11.111111 lill II 11 1111 111111111111111111, 1111 1111111 1 SI 11111111 mil 1 1111111 111111.1.11111111111111111.111111 1111 111111111111111,11 1111 1 I I II 1, 1, 11111111 111 1 i 1111111, 1 111111 11 11 1 11111 References Cited Andreas, Alfred Theodore 1874 An Illustrated Historical Atlas of the State of Minnesota. A.T. Andreas, Chicago. Anfinson, John O. 2003 River of History: A Historic Resources Study of the Mississippi National River and Recreation Area. With contributions by Thomas Madigan, Drew M. Forsberg, and Patrick Nunnally. Published jointly by National Park Service and U.S, Army Corps of Engineers, St. Paul District. Anfinson, Scott A. 1979 A Handbook of Minnesota Prehistoric Ceramics. Occasional Publications in Minnesota Anthropology 5. Minnesota Archaeological Society, St. Paul. 1990 Archaeological Regions in Minnesota and the Woodland Period. In The Woodland Tradition in the Western Great Lakes: Papers Presented to Elden Johnson, edited by Guy E. Gibbon, pp. 135-166. Department of Anthropology Publications in Anthropology 4. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Birk, Douglas A. 1991 French Presence in Minnesota: The View from Site Mo20 near Little Falls. In French Colonial Archaeology: The Illinois Country and the Western. Great Lakes, edited by John A. Walthall, pp. 237-266. University of Illinois Press, Urbana, Bleed, Peter 1969 The Archaeology of Petaga Point: The Preceramic Component. Minnesota Prehistoric Archaeology Series 2. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul. Brauer & Associates Ltd. Inc. 1978 Lake Elmo Park Master Plan, Washington County, Minnesota. Brauer & Associates Ltd. Inc., Minneapolis. Clouse, Robert 1985 Historic Context Outlines: The Prehistoric Contexts, Minnesota History in Sites & Structures: A Comprehensive Preservation Planning Process. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. 141601....e? Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 3.32 00.4.11,14/.1,4 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship I " waN. I 410+., 010,11 oIL I bui.adilitogo Dobbs, Clark A. 1989 Historic Context Outlines: The Contact Period Contexts (ca. 1630 A.D. — 1820 A,D.). Minnesota History in Sites & Structures: A Comprehensive Preservation Planning Process and Institute for Minnesota Archaeology Reports of Investigations 39. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. Dobbs, Clark A. and Scott Anfinson 1989 Outline of Historic Contexts for the Prehistoric Period (ca. 12,000 B.P, A.D. 1700). Minnesota History in Sites & Structures: A Comprehensive Preservation Planning Process and Institute for Minnesota Archaeology Reports of Investigations 37. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. Florin, F. 1996 Late Paleoindians of Minnesota and Vegetation Changes from. 10,500 — 8,000 B.P. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Gibbon, Guy E. 1973 The Sheffield Site: An Oneota Site on the St. Croix River. Minnesota Prehistoric Archaeology Series 10, Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul, 1998 Old Copper in Minnesota: A Review. Plains Anthropologist 43:27-50. Gibbon, Guy E., editor 1982 Oneota Studies. Department of Anthropology, Publications in Anthropology 1. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis. Goodman, Robert & Nancy Goodman 2004 Focus on Community History — Lake Elmo. Staying in Touch, p. 6. Accessed at httn://www.lakeelino.com Harrison, C., E. Redepenning, C.L. Hill, G. Rapp, Jr., S.E. Aschenbrenner, J.K. Huber, and S.C. Mulholland 1995 The Paleoindians of Southern St. Louis County, Minnesota: The Reservoir Lakes Complex. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, Iowa. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 3.33 111,10 II in 1 11011 11 11011111 hi Ili 111 In 1161 I 1101 111011 I Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship 1 111111011 Inn1 111111 hi I 11 11i 11 111111 1 1 1111 1 in 1111 1 1 11 II11 1 11111111 n 1111111 1 1111 1 1111 11 1 1 11,111111111E1, 111111,1 I Ohl 11, 11, II 14 11,1 Higginbottom, D.K. 1996 An Inventory of Fluted Projectile Points from Minnesota. Paper presented at the 54th Annual Plains Conference, Iowa City, Iowa. Hixson, W.W. & Company 1916 Atlas of Minnesota. W.W. Hixson & Company, Rockford, Hudson Map Company 1938 Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Hudson Map Company, Minneapolis. Marschner, F.J. 1930 Map of the Original Vegetation of Minnesota. Reprinted in 1978 by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, Nelson, Thomas O. Company 1954? Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota. Thomas O. Nelson Company, Fergus Falls, Minnesota. Northwest Publishing Company 1901 Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. Northwest Publishing Company, Des Moines, Iowa. Shane, 0.C. III 1989 Ice Age Hunters in Minnesota. The Institute for Minnesota Archaeology Quarterly Newsletter 4(3). Stanley, David G. & Art Hoppin (with contributions by Jeff Anderson & Robert Vogel) 1989 Phase I Cultural Resource Survey of Landfill Inventory Site G in Washington County, Minnesota. Bear Creek Archaeology Report #8. Bear Creek Archaeology, Iowa. State Historic Preservation Office 1985 Historic Context Outlines: The Post -Contact Period Contexts, Minnesota History in Sites & Structures: A Comprehensive Preservation Planning Process. On file at the Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office. Swain, C.N. 1926 Plat Book and Township Directory of Washington County, Minnesota. C.N. Swain, Minneapolis. 11111.111SIL I no I, 1 1,111 . 1 114. 4 1 L-1.4 a ARA Lake Elmo Park Reserve MasterPlan Amendment - Washington County 3.34 Chapter Three - Cultural Resources Stewardship liil Alim10,011114:, Ilh 11,111.A.00lihoiliddiii A, ,10/4L1Ilikool A:64,Am 4AI AlsILI I 1,110,,I A I,1 l I 111011110i I !MAO uII I, 011. 111164,,I,,Ad..AI 1 1 lII, ,.Aba.Alooa The Atlas Company? 1948? Plat Book of Washington County, Minnesota. The Atlas Company, St, Paul. Trygg, J.W. 1969 Composite Map of U.S. Land Surveyors Original Plats & Field Notes. Minnesota Series, Sheet 7. Ely, Minnesota. Wedel, Mildred M. 1974 Le Sueur and the Dakota Sioux. In Aspects of Upper Great Lakes Anthropology: Papers in Honor of Lloyd A. Wilford, edited by Elden Johnson, pp. 157-171. Minnesota Prehistoric Archaeology Series 11. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul. Wilford, Lloyd A., Elden Johnson, and Joan Vicinus 1969 Burial Mounds of Central Minnesota: Excavation Reports. Minnesota Prehistoric Archaeology Series 1. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul. Winchell, N.H. 1911 The Aborigines of Minnesota. Minnesota Historical Society, St. Paul. Websites Consulted Washington County GenWeb Project, htto://www.rootsweb.corn/—mnwashin/ Washington County Government's Website htto://www.co.washington.mn.us/your county government/about washington county/ Scenic St. Croix Valley (Lake Elrno) hav://www.saintcroixriver.com/htnril docs/towns scvrtailakeelnio,htrn1 Working Together: A Preservation Plan for Minnesota's Historic Properties, 2000-2005. litta://www.mnhs.ora/nreserve/shoo/MSPPvl .ndf Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 3.35 Chapter Four Natural Resources Stewardship Muktaiwaihiii6.1iallAiimootioiJ1iI.AKAWAL *aglow 'W44111.0404 Niolowok 11,111,1, mike 11,11111141111 01 II 1 Iltit-d5;1111i1 1 u43 oifiltoig.14111161,1 •11,1111 tia 4,4,111115 ium,..,:h1.6.1,..togilhdo,14. Iv g.ws hi.A.gihm,Yoam,o,11, Chapter 4: Natural Resources Stewardship Introduction The gently rolling topography of this large park provides a tremendous opportunity for establishment of a truly natural recreational and educational amenity for east Metro residents. In addition to the diverse water features of the park, there are significant native woodland and savanna remnants. Several large old fields have also been restored into prairie during the past few years. It has been stated that the goal for the park's landscape is to restore it to "pre -settlement conditions". It is appropriate to also consider peoples preferences, such as forest verses prairie (both of which are native) as we layout a plan for the parks landscape and management plan. In addition to the typical ecological information (soils, topography, hydrology, etc.), this plan will incorporate user preferences for landscape type and management/maintenance parameters so as to develop a restorative landscape plan that is practical, sustainable and valued by it users. Vegetative Cover The existing vegetation of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve (see Figure 4.1) is categorized as four significant types: Old Field, Cropland, Prairie Restoration, and "Significant Oak Forest". One additional category, represented by light green is existing mesic forest or woodland. The Woodland areas cover the inner area of the Reserve and appropriately buffer the two main Lakes: Lake Elmo and Eagle Point Lake as well as the multiple smaller water bodies and wetlands. The Mesic forest includes indicator species such as Red Oak, White Oak, Aspen, Birch, and Ironwood. Agricultural vegetation is also predominant in the Park Reserve. Areas to the Northwest and Southeast are currently used for crops, predominantly corn and soybeans. The Yellow indicates "Old Field" areas where the fields have been maintained as fallow fields. These fields have been seeded with a non-native pasture mix and are managed primarily by mowing. In other areas of the Park, prairie restoration projects are underway and have converted Farm fields into significant areas for the restoration of tall -grass prairie. This includes the predominant grass species such as Big Bluestem, Indian Grass, Canada Wild Rye, Switch Grass and Cord Grass as well as the following prairie forbs: Asters, Indigo, Wild Bergamot, Black-eyed Susan, and Golden Rod. The native prairie plants not only stabilize the soil and are adapted to the local climate, the seeds of these prairie plants provide an abundant source of food for insects, birds, and other wildlife throughout the year. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 4.1 Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship ..1....1.. II.. ,i.. 11.1 11.1. 11 ,11 1111111111,1 i 11111.,. 111.11 111111.11 i 1i-1111111 1,1 111111 .1. 1 III 111.111111_11 11. III 1 ill 11,! Ii!i.I 11.11.1 III 1 1 1 .! 1 11 II 1101111011111111 111111 IIlIiuIIII•IIIlII 111 11111 I The "Significant Oak Forest" is a remnant of an Oak Forest in the Northern part of the Park Reserve, Within this remnant, there are also a couple of kettle ponds set within the rolling topography. This remnant of majestic oak trees is also infested with the invasive species of Buckthorn and presents a problem of crowing the forest which inhibits species movement and shades the groundcover so the forest is unable to regenerate itself. The existing vegetation, in its current state, is predominantly grassland. The current vegetation is disconnected, which means there is a lack of vegetated corridors and edges for species movement across and throughout the park. Vegetated corridors of native shade trees and shrubs are important for wildlife for food as well as for migratory patterns. Increasing the number of shade trees and restoring the landscape to an Oak Savanna, would provide more enclosure and create interesting sightlines and views across the park. Invasive Plant Species; Management and Control Controlling invasive exotic plants, particularly buckthorn and Reed canary grass, will be one of the big challenges in restoring this land. It is recommended to clear the site of these problem plants, as they are so destructive to our native plant communities. These plants prevent regeneration of native species and consequentially degrade or eliminate habitat for many insect, animal and bird species. It is also important, from an educational perspective that people have the opportunity to see what nature is. Parks that are infested with honeysuckle, arnur maple and buckthorn confuse people as to what really constitutes a natural landscape. People assume that if a plant is green and in a park- it must be natural and good! It is important to deliver a natural, pre -settlement landscape if that is our stated goal. Eliminating invasive exotics and the on- going maintenance of the desired ecosystems in the park will require significant, long term funding. At this stage, it is more important to address the removal and management of exotic invasives than to plant new trees and shrubs. There is a bank of native seeds in the soil. Removing the exotics allows for sunlight to reach the soil and for the indigenous plants to regenerate themselves. al II I Va 04.11 .1i 11 • 1 I 11 / Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 4.2 4011,,ZR kimarramarmarommwmovaimm Co Rd 10 t( state 1-1 rirlir."'"Illarrltt.trarrattr" I } loth StN r- 0 VEGETATIVE COVER INVENTORY z- Legend 0 - E Cu Significant Oak Forest LJ Prairie Restoration . Cropland Old Field Significant Lake Beach Veg. Significant Lake Bed Veg, Other Hiking Only Trails Multi Use Trails -- Paved Trails — Roads :11 Parking Main Office Maintenance Facility Restroom Amphitheater Modem Camping Primitive Camping Picnic Shelter Swimrning Pond Children's Play Area Boat Ramp Canoe Launch Equestrian Center Archery Washington County Parks Sanders Wacker Barely, Inc, Savanna Designs 011erdOrf nRArrc faaaadialMcaa aMa„ CaMccaa chappam maaalsat ay Sandara Wackeramacy, Ina. • aandamaya Artalatts and Mammas Mama arta facia. amp nacalram ham tha WamIrmanat Coaray G•S Sow: Una May. 2005 , 00 1O00 2 Feel 4. Chapter Four Natural Resources Stewardship • 16iiiidONDIOINAL4J. WilbihiNaila141160.11.4.,411§;+:11goiwi.....WIL6Wei! Soils The soils of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve are predominantly considered to be sandy loam, a moderate to well drained soils which offers fair potential for crops and pasture. The majority of the soils are considered to be suitable for woodland. There is a moderately high content of gravelly sand which results in moderate to rapid permeability and potential erosion in the areas where the landscape is undulating. The potential for erosion requires great sensitivity when planning trails and uses in the park as these soils are less stable. The majority of the soil types are considered to have a moderate natural fertility and moderate to low organic matter content. In the western and northern section of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve (indicated in blue on the soils map), the soils are identified as Silt Loam, are poorly drained soils and have a high water table. These soils tend to be collections points for surface water as either drainage ways or depressions. Topography The topography of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve consists primarily of a gently undulating landscape with lower elevations in the South -Central area of the park in conjunction with the two large lakes and multiple water bodies. There are relatively few steep slopes over 18% and the highest points in the park occur in the corners to the west, southwest, and northwest. This gently undulating landscape is conducive to an Oak Savanna restoration. Landscape Ecology and Sustainability It is desirable to have a landscape that is sustainable and has a high level of ecological quality and integrity. In the most simple of terms, landscape ecology represents the study of relationships between people, ecosystems, species, energy, pollutants, disturbance, conservation and many more influences on the landscape. The landscape is in a state of constant change inflicted by the actions and forces of all living organisms as well as natural forces such as weather, fire, water; landscape ecology seeks to understand how to balance all of these aspects. Sustainability is a term that represents a practice that limits or moderates the input of energy and chemicals into the landscape in order to promote long-term plant health, water quality, wildlife habitat, and human health. Both of these terms promote a balance of human and natural forces for the greatest good of wildlife and humans alike. Though they are ideological terms, they represent key values related Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 4.3 Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship 45,441144 bi„ 11:11L1,111,1 61. i 6-1,,IA1 1111,14,4 11.1k4111il 1.4111 Nal:Sill AI 4.4.5165 Oil., I 514,1i 414111111.„1,14.116 • I Li5 4 IJNOSIMM 1,111,111 1 i.11111 1 la 1, o 111 iL111,1,41.,.,.1 I..... 4.. . 1 .1 1111. ..1111.11.....14b to the promoting long-term health of the environment, humans, plants, and wildlife. The Lake Elmo Park Reserve is an example of a landscape which has both human factors and natural factors influencing the ecology and sustainability of the landscape. The following goals can be set to attain a more sustainable landscape. First, turf and lawn can be minimized in order to reduce mowing and the use of fertilizer. Secondly, minimizing the use of herbicides and fertilizers will reduce the amount of nutrients and chemicals that will eventually reach water bodies as runoff. Thirdly, in minimizing the use of electric gasoline and gasoline powered engines, air quality will be improved. Lastly, by working with dominant native ecosystems and existing soils, plant diversity will increase, plant communities will be regenerative, wildlife populations will be sustained, and the park will provide educational and experiential opportunities for users, As planning takes place for future uses, sustainability and the understanding of landscape ecology are important values to consider in order to plan for a landscape which will promote wildlife habitat and movement, provide a location for humans to enjoy and experience the natural environment, and to make choices in landscape management that conserves financial, environmental, and intangible resources. Natural Resource Education and Interpretation Currently, there are several areas of the park with high levels of ecological integrity and beauty. They are all located in the eastern part of the park, where not surprisingly, most of the parks use and development has taken place. Locating interpretive signs and educational opportunities along the existing paths and by the shelters and play structure would give visitors the information to better understand the oak forest and rolling terrain. The western half of the park needs more restoration and growth before it is valuable from an interpretive perspective. However, Eagle Point Lake and the migrant bird populations it attracts could be made much more accessible and could host a variety of bird and wetland observation facilities. This plan also calls for a new nature center building to be located on the knoll at the eastern shore of Eagle Point Lake. This building will open up vistas out over the Lake and also provide trailhead connections as well as indoor space for displays and education. ka. .1. 5, ..4.5 54441. 1444 .50444.4 4445 .54. 545444..4 5.4, 0.4 4 hts4450.141141„4144„.444.51,14..4.41155,141.4aMINIXOWMI . I•I .141 4 I1,4,4I .1101141.0101.11,0 44 le 1_5, a .441 1114M1.441 PI 1111 5 441IMMINON Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment Washington County 4.4 Chapter Fou liadmiaShOlikatJadailaaahl.,44tillidtAkiwOd.,,Aaaldall.ala-464444..;Ydi Natural Resources Stewardship Restorative Landscape Plan The long-term management plan for the Park (Brauer, 1978) is for plant communities to resemble a mosaic that mimics land area prior to the arrival of the settlers in the Mid-1800's. The concept for this plan (see Figure 4.2) would be to use landscape restoration planting methods and natural regeneration to reestablish the prairie, savanna, forests, and wetlands in the areas where the soils and aspect is appropriate for that ecosystem. The idea is to also work with time and ecological succession and allow the forest to spread over more of the park. Ecological succession is a natural process where plant species replace each other over time. Each stage of a plant community gives way to the next, setting the stage for the next dominant plant community. Temporary, successional plant communities are replaced by more stable plant communities until a sort of equilibrium in the landscape is reached. The rate of succession is influenced by disturbance, such as a windstorm disease, or fire and can be accelerated and directed by proper management Management techniques may control the dominant plant community. For example, if a prairie plant community, dominated by grasses and forbs (prairie flowers) is left alone, more aggressive shrub species will move in and over time, shade out the prairie plants. Eventually, sapling trees will move in and out - compete most of the shrub species, giving way to a mature shade tree plant community. A prairie plant community, however, can be maintained with management techniques of fire and mowing. While prairie, savanna, forests and wetlands are native to this local area, disturbance regimes, such as fire are important to maintain them and regenerate the plant life cycles. During the information gathering process, participants and the local community have expressed a preference for a variety of ecosystems that were once native to the park. This would provide for greater educational opportunities, allow for more wildlife diversity and make the system more sustainable as a whole. The Restorative landscape plan identifies five major plant communities or ecosystem types. Upland Forest is dominated by native Maples, Ash, and Oaks. The Oak Savanna plant community consists of a maximum of a 30% canopy cover by Bur Oak trees; short prairie grasses such as little bluestem and prairie dropseed and prairie forbs would dominate the ground layer. This community is most often found in an area of gentle topography in dry, sandy soils. Prairie is recognized as the third ecotype, consisting of tall grasses mixed with prairie forbs. The Aspen Glade ecotype is found primarily in the low-lying areas of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The plant community consists of thick clones of Aspens with other species tolerant of semi -wet conditions. Lastly, wetland is identified as the final ecotype where grasses, sedges, forbs and emergent plants are present in fluctuating water levels and warmiaril Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 4.5 Chapter Four- Natural Resources Stewardship AIILA 11,11.i VII Iliolh411!111A.611.4 1.,01 141111.11L,Loilli ..,m614.1.,1 hi 1 1,11 111,111 11411 11, ,1,1; ,1 liod. wo, 4.11 k _10.11111 I 1.1..1 , I I ni.,111. II.I II I I .111.. .1 I J 4.1 1111 provides significant habitat for water fowl. Consideration of a range of factors determined where each ecotype was most suitable. Factors such as slopes, soils, previous conditions, wetland buffers, and low lying areas, were studied in order to develop the restorative landscape plan. Oak savanna is the predominant landscape type shown on the plan for a variety of reasons, which corresponds to the ecological history of Washington County. In addition, from an aesthetic standpoint, this landscape type is also appropriate for the Lake Elmo Park Reserve due to the open quality which allow for open views and provides habitat for many species of birds and wildlife. Oak Savanna is also a very desirable landscape for people to inhabit. There is an open quality yet some canopy and shade so that people do not feel too open or exposed. Oak trees spaced across an undulating landscape are conducive to park activities such as picnicking, playing and camping. The five native ecosystem types proposed in the Restorative Landscape Plan provide for a high level of habitat diversity, which will attract and provide a home for an array of animals, birds, and butterflies as well as provide and an interesting landscape for park visitors to use, Landscape Types and Plant lists Oak Savanna Shade Trees Bur Oak Quercus macrocarpa White Oak Quercus alba Northern Pin Oak Quercus ellipsoidalis Hawthorn Crataegus crusgalli Black Cherry Prunus serotina 1 I II g s.. ik 11 Likl 1111.111,1 10 I WWI.. I I lk I . I 11 1.,111. I ki I.. II Ili II I . I I .. III al pal I ..0. , III I I 1111 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment -Washington County 4.6 Screen Plantings Along Hwy 5- Mixed Conifer!Deciduous Fore Restore to Oak Savanna -- Lot 'aid Woods" Spread Out Mcsic Forest Wetland & Marsh Mixed Forest- Con!fors Meslc Deciduous Forest Savanna Edge ------ Lowland Forest Oak Fence to Spread and Hardwood Forest n Hiph Ground Upland Forest vannA Prairie Aspen Glade Wetlands 6,artal r Aa§ a r tpi'I o Wa5 nt'nn rr)ny^f St1{ May nr 2015 iris dory mien G'n?001;7 p:J.'):ogi+r. Wray ,faM'irxttcn County• P;Nks w[h Bandar.+ Warknr Rsviirry. r ;. Savanna ^<lsipr5c Ar'v Dflr mdari wrr. r t1 ai,: rcx, Chapter Four Natural Resources Stewardship Milifialiii..110.iiigt40,k,144.1,,,M,,,,,,,Nioh, 4.40.111i1 404 . 111P,11,.14,4 III kl I 11 1,...1110,4101.11 II. IIIIl0,001 01I iilh ll.14 Ili AI. I d‘dr. 0.0111iblii0119041,41. 1016 II Ilt II ik Shrubs American Hazelnut Chokecherry Gray Dogwood Juneberries, Serviceberry Nannyberry Groundcover Little bluestem Big Bluestem Prairie dropseed Haiiry grama Porcupine grass Gray goldenrod Purple prairie clover Rough blazingstar Rigid sunflower Tall cinquefoil Sky-blue aster Silky aster Dotted blazingstar Wild lupine Butterfly weed Upland Forest- Mesic Shade & Everereen Trees Sugar Maple Canada Hemlock Basswood American Elm Ironwood, Hophornbeam White Ash Red Oak Corylus americana Prunus virginiana Cornus racemosa Amelanchier canandensis Viburnum lentago Schizachyrium scoparium Andropogon gerardii Sporobulus heterolepis Bouteloua hirsuta Stipa spartea Solidago nemoralis Petalostemon purpureum Liatris aspera Helianthus rigidus Potentilla arguta Aster oolentangiensis Aster sericeus Liatris punctat Lupinus perennis Asclepias tuberosa Acer saccharrum Tsuga canadensis Tilia americana Ulmus americana Ostrya virginiana Fraxinus americana Quercus rubrum Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendm n ashin ton County 4.7 Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship 1111.1i .1111.11:401I 411.111 I III1I111,..1... I WI/101110 1 10111.14 AI III, I 11 1111 OW 11 II 0111 111.1,411 II 1, 11111 111 III .11 1111111., , 111111111 0 Ili 111111 I W 11 1.1 4.1 1.11...,11 1.11A,I.. .1 1 1.1 4.41 II 11 .41 1.1: .., 14.. L..I 141. I: .1 11 14..1. 4111 White Oak Northern Pin Oak Balsam Fir White Pine Paper Birch Black Cherry Shrubs American Hazelnut Chokecherry Gray Dogwood Juneberries, Serviceberry Nannyberry Groundcover Baneberry Anemone Wild Sarsparilla Big -leaved aster Bluebead Lily Wood Fern Northern Bedstraw (scented) False Lily of the Valley Northern Bishops Cap Hairy Solomon's Seal Large flowered Trillium Smooth Violet I Aspen Thicket Trees Aspen Black Alder Alder Quercus alba Quercus ellipsoidalis Abies balsamea Pinus strobus Betula papyrifera Prunus serotina Corylus americana Prunus virginiana Cornus racenwsa Amelanchier canandensis Viburnum lentago Actaea alba Anemone quiricefolia Aralia nudicalus Aster macrophyllus Clintonia borealis Dryopteris austriaca Gallia?! triflorum Maianthernum canadense Mitella nuda Polygonatum pubescens Trilium granifloum Viola pubescens Populous tremuloides Prunus serotina Alnus incana Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County ku I I 1 111 1 1 .11 /I 1 11W I 4.8 Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship 611,111.1n1111161111S,IMIldamiiirdiM111 14,10411110111111011110,11111111.1 lII,I 01.011 11,11111RA 1114161 1,1.1111liI 11 • 6. 44 114-1 ,1•1111.11J1k. I.10111 N...11h 111.0 mai IIi bUl 1 OH. Lila" 111W1 I li11611M4K11.41,11.111,1iel,..1.11111'1 Shrubs American Hazelnut Chokecherry Gray Dogwood Sumac Juneberries, Serviceberry Arrowwood Viburnum NannybeiTy Diervilla lonicera Grasses Little bluestem Big Bluestem Indian Grass Canada blue -joint grass Sedge Prairie: Groundcover Little bluestem Big Bluestem Prairie dropseed Haiiry grama Porcupine grass Gray goldenrod Purple prairie clover Rough blazingstar Rigid sunflower Tall cinquefoil Sky-blue aster Silky aster Dotted blazingstar Wild lupine Corylus americana Prunus virginiana Cornus racemosa Rhus typhinia Amelanchier canandensis Viburnum dentatum Viburnum lentago Bush Honeysuckle Schizachyrium scoparium Andropogon gerardii Sorghastrum nutans Calarnagrostis canadensis Carex Schizachyrium scoparium Andropogon gerardii Sporobulus heterolepis Bouteloua hirsuta Stipa spartea Solidago nemoralis Petalostemon purpureum Liatris aspera Helianthus rigidus Potentilla arguta Aster oolentangiensis Aster sericeus Liatris punctat Lupinus perennis Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 4.9 Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship 111,.[14.11 4111 AIN 11[111101111 ..110111N1 1. 1111114111111111,11111.4111111161111 111111 II 4[1...111+11,11111. 11N11,1111141 1111ill i 11 II& lilidi..1 [1,.... 111111 [111111m 11111.'d 11111114 4144111 141111111 1. Nli 1.1111011. 11 di , 111141 1 1 1 1111141111 . 111 U II 11[11 11 Butterfly weed Chokecherry Redtwig Dogwood Gray Dogwood Juneberries, Serviceberry Winterberry I Wetland/Pond Plants Trees Quaking Aspen Cottonwood Shrubs Gray Dogwood Redtwig Dogwood Asclepias tuberosa Prunus virginiana Cornus sericea Cornus racemosa Amelanchier canandensis Illex verticillata Populus tremuloides Populus deltoides Cornus racemosa Cornus sericea Grasses. Sedees. Forbs and Emeruent plants) Boneset Broadleaved arrowhead Bluejoint grass Softstem bullrush Sedge Fox sedge Woolgrass Cattail Bulb -bearing water -hemlock Northern marsh fern Swamp milkweed Marsh bellflower Marsh cinquefoil Joe Pye weed Turtlehead Sweetflag Eupatorium peifoliatum Sagittaria latifolia Calarnagrostis canadensis Scirpus validus Carex scoparia Carex vulpinoidea Scirpus cyperinus Typha latifolia Cicuta bulbifera Thelypteris palustris Asclepias incarnata Campanula aparinoides Potentilla palustris Eupatorium maculation Chelone glabra Acorus calamus Mall" ILA I • UMMEMINaliniME 1 I 1. to b • I I I ••. 1 1 1 I I Lake E o Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 4.10 Water Plantain Marsh marigold Pickerelweed Chapter Four - Natural Resources Stewardship Idui I IWOilidOlwiwii10,1111114.1aa.,/ollillial.1.14164.1alold.4.4•1.1..A41161.[...“,11,,,k InhIIL 1 I ulil 1111 1110.41,,la dr.1,11 ol *all! „i 11 loho „iik 1,4,w 4.1illiwkl,lotahl0i4 141;1164144 ilidniultliwkl,dolo Y..101. ili I AMMO Alistna trivale Caltha palustris Pontedira cordata - Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 4.11 Chapter Five - Development Plan 110 0014010 0010 101 10101 0100000.10.00.100000,101, di 0. . 1 I 0.I Id 1 10111 illi il .0 • II Idi,i0100,0001 0.00 100010i •1000,110000 . 10010 11111,. 11,10.44 .4,01 low 01111,00,0-901 0000,000 r0otki0 1.04kb...A 000 la0k.66.0 Id id,,..010,1.0411 Chapter 5: Development Plan Introduction The discussions with stakeholder groups included review of the expansion or addition of park facilities and activities that relate to the following categories: • Natural and cultural resource protection and restoration • Natural and cultural resource interpretation • Camping • Picnicking • Water -based facilities • Trails • Miscellaneous facilities The input received during the process has shaped planning and design concepts that relate to each of the categories. Recommendations are included in the following paragraphs and on the Development Plan found on Figure 5.1. Refer also to Chapter 3-Cultural Resource Stewardship and Chapter 4-Natural Resource Stewardship. Development Concepts Natural and Cultural Resource Protection and Restoration The majority of the land in Lake Elmo Park Reserve has been disturbed by farming or other activity as indicated on Figure ?. Approximately 279 acres•are currently under cultivation, however, all tilled fields are expected to become fallow during the next 10 years. The design concept for the field acreages includes methodical restoration of woodland, prairie and wetland plant communities. The planting and landscape management practices, discussed in Chapter 4 — Natural Resources Stewardship, will essentially speed-up the process of natural succession. The efforts will help to expand woodlands, create rich plant diversity at woodland edges, encourage oak savanna, native prairie, and wetland vegetation to thrive and provide improved habitat for birds, mammals and other wildlife. Many areas of the park where vegetation has been allowed to progress naturally have been invaded by Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 5.1 Chapter Five - Development Plan non-native plants such as buckthorn, knapweed, purple loosestrife and reed canary grass. Landscape management practices have included control of invasive species and will continue to focus on removal of the nuisance plants and replacement using native plant varieties. Refer to Chapter 4 for additional information about invasive plant control. Cultural resources in the park include farmsteads with buildings and remnants of buildings remaining. There are four existing barns in the park that have been maintained by the Parks Division. The barns are in good condition and three of the structures are excellent examples of Midwest barn architecture from the early 20th century. Two of the barns are currently used for storage and two are empty. The structures will remain and are identified for specific uses as described in other paragraphs in this chapter. Refer to Chapter 3-Cultural Resources Stewardship for additional information about European settlement in the area and suggestions for management of related cultural resources. Evidence of Native American activity was found in two locations in the park by an archeological survey completed in the 1980's. Because of the numerous water bodies and historically diverse wildlife habitat, there is a high probability that additional American Indian archaeological sites are present. The shores of Lake Elmo and Eagle Point Lake should be considered high priority for additional archeological surveys. Information generated by survey work would be used to prepare interpretive displays describing the pre - settlement history of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Survey data would also be considered in the preparation of designs for new park facilities. Refer to Chapter 3-Cultural Resources Stewardship for additional information about Native American activity in the area and suggestions for management of related cultural resources. Natural and Cultural Resource Interpretation There is growing public interest in learning about nature and cultural history. There are several nature/interpretive centers in the regional park system that include educational displays and programs relating wildlife, plant communities, ecology and archeological discovery. An interpretive center for study and instruction about Lake Elmo Park Reserve's natural and cultural resources is planned for construction on the east shore of Eagle Point Lake. In addition to its interpretive function, the structure will serve as a trailhead and as an information center describing park programs and facilities. The facility will function well as a major focal point in the park with appeal to a broad spectrum of visitors. A small amphitheater with a seating capacity of 200 to 250 is planned in proximity to the interpretive Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County I 1 1 • lk MI 14 141k1 I ki le, I • AMA I L.. II II 1.111 lb .1 11 1.1 Ykl I I • A I • -0319011111111116111011.10 5.2 ° 8 ttttt Tr.r.!" tomwr,tor„; L'Okurre., 1,,,r1,"drorm end k0,0w,c,,,,r. hroo Eqmo PCC, 14cer,„C'l ACC; OCCAUFIC TCCP Shaft ft 5 cr.ccrttc=c-.C.c,c,-"="7" Crninrcand \, ' ' rc s 'W) / t trZZ.,,,,,,,,ZZZZZrz.ZZO, , , . . ,,,t' tAw,,,irli,1 I. i,d r"rrort — jm1.11971.mmilos ; Troa'; „ • "" pri.m4Pek; CProgri.m.fic, • 0.,.xtid;:tx. •',.,44,9%,13NNtiy4"" skf Tom -tc 47,0V Pfintm-NingNrq TnNIN„.1",:rf ,W,col4gt "trP.94 Orotnc Off.r,Tricnka, • "" rrEn 1Cih St N. 3 ;-; Ar,ceilettioh, PolkIPtr. Arrn,,triattor. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Legend ExlEting Park Facades ; • Hiking/Ski Trails • Multi Use Trails --- Paved Trails Roads fg Parking 12 Main Office Et Maintenance Facility • Restroorn ge, Amphitheater C Modern Camping rt Primitive Camping 03.4 Pfcnic Shelter g, Swimming Pond Ctilldrent Play Area • Poet Ramp ✓ Canoe Launch ta Equestrian Center el Archery 1,1,vtr, Proposer' tr)e7k.rr014„, Nokker, nrir 017011•,t1 p Parcel data pmvcfed by Wash;Vort County GIS &ippon LW In May of 2005, T01,4 data ts inCrdad tor EiNnerd pfacting Washington County Parks with Sanders Wacker Bergly. Inc. Savanna Designs Amy (Mended ,NreN'NNLNeN nIniN 2)7NN oNn NN, oN NINN Fire 5, P. Chapter Five - Development Plan center. The facility will serve as an outdoor venue for educational programs related to nature study and cultural history. It will be easy to access for all park visitors and will provide somewhat more seating capacity than the existing program areas located at the modern and group campgrounds in the park. Interpretive signs and displays will be placed at selected locations in the park to describe natural and cultural features. The intent of the displays will be to assist visitors in understanding the ecology, geology and cultural history of the park site. Wildlife blinds and nature trails will be constructed to provide access to high quality habitat areas in the park. The facilities will supplement similar existing facilities in providing opportunities for nature - oriented activities such as birding, photography, orienteering and nature study. Care will be taken to minimize adverse impact on the habitat areas. Camping The existing modern campground is extremely popular and is consistently filled on weekends during the fair-weather camping season. The equestrian campground is frequently used as an overflow facility to help meet the demand for family camping opportunities and is little used for equestrian camping. The plan proposes converting the equestrian campground into a modern campground; adding approximately 40 additional family camping spurs in that general location. The new camping loops would be located closer to the edge of the woods west of the existing campground to create a more appealing setting campers. The spurs will be equipped with water hook-ups and electrical service designed to accommodate the high amperage required to effectively serve large trailers and motor homes. The 'camping spur' design of the existing equestrian campground does not function well for the truck and trailer rigs used by equestrians. Riders have also expressed a concern about the safety of sharing a campground and trailhead with other campers. The plan proposes to redesign the equestrian campground and trailhead and move the facilities to a different location. The proposed location is the north farmstead area, which offers a barn that could be used as part of this development. The layout of the campground will be similar to a traditional group campground design that provides more flexibility for general circulation and use of the facility. The existing group campground is popular and improvements are proposed for the facilities, Campsite #1 will be relocated to improve the setting and parking will be placed near the site to provide for groups requiring more convenient access to their campsite (existing parking is remote from the sites). One of the barns will be moved from the north farmstead to the group campground to provide space for restrooms .1 11P.,1111, 11111.1,41111..,...31,H L Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment— Washington County 6.3 Chapter Five - Development Plan and gatherings. Trees and canopies will be added throughout the camping areas as required to offer shade in the relatively open setting of the campground. Walk-in campsites will be added to the existing, high quality primitive campground. The plan proposes improvements to the parking area installation of potable water service for campers. Picnicking The large, existing picnic shelters are extremely popular and are consistently rented on weekends during the picnicking season. Large groups are served well in the park, but additional facilities for smaller groups are proposed. Small shelters with a capacity of 4 to 10 tables will be placed in locations that will work well in serving visitors that are using other facilities in the park. One or two shelters are planned near the destination playground and existing fishing pier where existing parking lots will serve the parking need. One or two shelters are also planned near the existing boat launch and proposed fishing pier where a small parking lot will be provided to serve the new picnic area. Some tables will be placed in the open park areas near the new shelters to provide additional picnicking opportunities. There are existing, small picnic areas in the park that are located in settings that have few mature trees and consist of open tables with no shelters. The areas are underutilized and would be more appealing if shelters were added to provide shade and strengthen the sense of place at these locations. The plan recommends adding small shelters (first come first serve) with a capacity of 4 to 10 tables to enhance the picnic areas and provide more choices for park visitors seeking a pleasant gathering place. Water -based Facilities The existing fishing pier on Lake Elmo is used heavily by families and other park visitors. A second pier is planned for a location north of the existing boat launch. The lake bottom drops -off fairly quickly at this location'and fish habitat is deemed to be good. Circulation patterns at the existing boat ramp, access drive and parking are not efficient. The layout of the facilities will be modified to shorten the time it takes to launch boats and park vehicles and to help avoid conflicts between boating visitors. The capacity of the parking lot will remain the same. Trails The Cross country ski trails in the park are high quality and varied in the challenges that they offer. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment — Washington County 5,4 Chapter Five Development Plan Lighted ski trails have proven to be popular in Three River's Park District, Ramsey County and Stearns County. Some of the trails are lit with light poles that are 15' to 20' high and others are lit with low level lights approximately 3' to 4' high. The low level lights are proposed for use in Lake Elmo Park Reserve to minimize glare and visibility of the lights from other locations in the park and from the surrounding area. The lighted trails offer extended use for skiers that are working during most of the winter daylight hours and for ski teams that spend a great deal of time practicing their sport. A lighted trail is proposed for existing trail loop C at Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The use of snow -making machines is proposed to compensate for reduced snowfall; an apparent trend for Minnesota winters. Additional snowshoeing and winter hiking trails will be provided in response to a high demand for outdoor winter exercise opportunities. More trails designated for these activities will help to reduce conflicts between skiers and walkers. Mountain biking is currently allowed on multi -use trails in the park. The contemporary designs for mountain bike trails, constructed recently in several Metro Area parks, are highly technical and offer challenges that have proven to be extremely popular with bikers. Trails should be constructed in conformance with design standards established by the International Mountain Bicycling Association to avoid problems with soil erosion and to minimize impacts on vegetation and other natural resources. A trail designed specifically for mountain biking (it would also accommodate snowshoeing in the winter) and a trailbead parking lot are proposed in the vicinity of the south end of Eagle Point Lake. The trail length will be 3 to 5 miles. Equestrian trails will be modified by eliminating equestrian use of the trail segments on the south and southwest sides of Eagle Point Lake. The change is made to protect soft erodible soils existing in this area of the park. In addition, a trail segment, similar in length to the segment to be deleted, will be added at the north end of the park to provide connections between the trail system and the proposed location for the new equestrian campground and trailhead. Bituminous -surfaced trails provide barrier free access to users of all ages and all levels of physical ability. They provide a save and comfortable walking surface in most weather conditions and have proven to attract more trail users (hikers, bikers, in -line skaters) than 'soft' trail surfaces in all types of park settings. Bituminous surfacing is proposed for park trails connecting to access points serving the Cities of Lake Elmo, Oakdale and Woodbury. A paved trail is also proposed to encircle Eagle Point Lake; joining the existing multi -use trail and providing all trail users the opportunity to experience the lake environs. Finally, bituminous trail connections will be added between park facilities as required. For example, improved connections are needed between the swimming pond and nearby camping, picnic and play 11111.1MMIINIMINIMIO • 1J pi, GIUSIMMIPIIIIINIMPAINIPIII 11. 113 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 6.5 Chapter Five - Development Plan areas. Trail access into the park will be designed to provide convenient connections to the cities of Lake Ehno, Oakdale and Woodbury. A number of alternative park entrance locations were considered and the following were chosen as preferred options: Connections convenient to Oakdale will likely occur at the location of the existing snowmobile trail on Inwood Ave. and at North 15th Street. A connection to Downtown Lake Elmo will likely occur near Klondike Street (the exact location will be coordinated with the City). The existing trail access on Keats Ave. is convenient to Woodbury. Where new trals are proposed for connection to city -owned trail segments, the construction will occur after the city segments are complete. This will help to ensure that placement of the park trails is consistent with city trail design objectives. Construction of underpasses beneath Hwy. 5 and the railroad tracks on the north side of the park is proposed to provide access to the City of Lake Elmo trail system and the Gateway Trail. The precise locations for the underpasses have not yet been determined. The Washington County Star Trail Association is permitted to maintain snowmobile trails that pass within the park along the southwest and northwest boundaries. Trail access points are located on Inwood Ave. and on Highway 5. The trail use will be allowed to continue in the park as long as adjacent communities permit such use and there is no conflict with park operations or negative impact on wildlife. Miscellaneous Facilities/Activities The exiting traditional archery target range is heavily used. The range will be relocated to a site south of the north farmstead and the number of targets will be increased. A field archery range will be constructed near the same location. The field range will include targets and shooting stations designed to simulate hunting conditions. The archery ranges will be designed in conformance with standards established by the National Archery Association and the National Field Archery Association. The Brown's Pond area will be developed to include winter skating, sledding facilities and cross-country skiing and snow shoeing trails. Summer use of the area will include hiking and nature appreciation. The existing barn at the site will serve as a trail head and multi -use activity center. A parking lot will be Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 5.6 1;104 1111111111dila mu! constructed to serve the facilities in the area. Chapter Five - Development Plan Dog field -trial events are currently conducted twice per year in open, short -grass, field areas of the park. The events may continue until native plant communities have been restored in the park to the extent that suitable space for the trials is no longer available. Acquisition of inholdings and other property is being considered on the southeast shore of Lake Elmo, at the southeast corner of the park and along Keats Avenue at the main entrance to the park. Refer to Chapter 6-Park Boundaries and Acquisition for additional information related to the properties. Facilities Discussed & Omitted Off -leash Dog Area It was determined that an off -leash dog area is not consistent with the county's mission in providing recreation opportunities for park visitors. The off -leash activity is known to have adverse impacts on natural features and wildlife habitat and is considered to be a better fit within a local park setting that supports intense recreational activities such as a 'community park' or 'community playfield' as classified in the Metropolitan Council's Regional Open Space Policy Plan. In addition, it was observed that the needs of off -leash dog area users are best served by facilities provided in parks that are sited in several locations throughout a city. This provides convenient access for frequent users. Off -leash areas are not recommended for development in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Winter Vehicle Access to Lake Elmo It was determined that vehicle travel on Lake Elmo during winter months does not relate to other facilities or programs existing or planned for Lake Elmo Park Reserve, and winter activities on the Lake are beyond the ability of the Parks Division to monitor or control. An access drive onto Lake Elmo is not recommended for development in the park. Disc Golf It was determined that disc golf is not consistent with the county's mission in providing recreation opportunities for park visitors. The activity is known to have adverse impacts on natural features and is a better fit within a local park setting that supports intense recreational activities such as a 'community park' or 'community playfield' as classified in the Metropolitan Council's Regional Open Space Policy Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment Washington County 5.7 Chapter Five - Development Plan Plan. A disc golf course is not recommended for development in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Undeveloped Facilities Included in the 1978 Master Plan The original Master Plan for Lake Elmo Park Reserve includes recommendations for two major facilities that have not been implemented to date. The first is a children's farm planned for development at the north farmstead and the second is a swimming beach planned for the southwest shore of Lake Elmo. Recommendations from the current planning process include the omission of the children's farm concept. Interpretation of farm structures and artifacts is proposed in lieu of development of a working farm, It was observed that the high cost of implementing and maintaining a children's farm at Lake Elmo Park Reserve may diminish the development and maintenance of other important facilities in the park. Additionally, there are similar facilities operating in the Metro Area that offer high quality educational experiences related to the "small farm" lifestyle once common in this region. Finally, the concept ranked extremely low in a recent county -wide recreation survey. It is recommended that the swimming beach proposed on Lake Elmo be omitted from the park improvement program. The existing swimming pond is heavily used and provides high quality swim facilities for park visitors. At the time that the existing pond was planned, it was determined that the lake bottom and shoreline conditions within the park were not suitable for beach development. The current planning process supports that finding. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 5.8 Chapter Six - Park Boundaries and Acquisition Chapter 6: Park Boundaries and Acquisition The Metropolitan Council's Regional Recreation Open Space Policy Plan indicates that the agency's two priorities for acquiring park and park reserve lands include: • Lands essential to protect the natural resources that define a park or park reserve and make it usable to the public as planned. • Lands that are essential for the park or park reserve to reach its full regional natural resource based outdoor recreation service potential as defined in the Council's regional park system plan and the park unit's master plan. Lake Elmo Park Reserve is located entirely within the City of Lake Elmo and is surrounded, primarily, by residential properties, most of which have been developed or are in the process of being developed. There are significant frontages along Inwood Ave. on the west side of the park, along a railroad corridor paralleling Hwy. 5 on the north and along County Rd. 17 on the east side of the park. The Park Reserve's 2165 acres is contiguous with the exception of a few relatively small inholdings located at the southeast corner of the park. The plan recommends that the county acquire the inholdings to complete the park acreage and prevent any possibility of future conflicts between park users and private property owners. The inholding parcels are shown on Figure ? and are described as follows: • Parcel A (0.75 acres): The property is an inholding with 65 feet of lakeshore frontage on Lake Elmo. The east boundary is within 55 feet of the west boundary of parcel B. The site contains a residence and related improvements. The residence should be removed and the shoreland and upland areas of the property should be restored to blend with aquatic and woodland vegetation on surrounding park property. • Parcel B (1.0 acres): The property is an inholding with 140 feet of frontage on County Rd. 17. The south boundary is within 1,460 feet of parcel C. The site contains a residence and related improvements. The residence should be removed and vegetation restored to blend with the woodland on adjacent park property. • Parcel C (1.0 acres): The property is an inholding with 200 feet of frontage on County Rd. 17. The south boundary is 400 feet from the north boundary of parcel D. The site contains a residence and related improvements. The residence should be removed and the vegetation Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment— Wash ng on County 6.1 Chapter Six - Park Boundaries and Acquisition LAI, II 1,}011.14:ti Aid .4.11 olt..1 di /AO! d I I . I . N 4 .14 4.0.014 .4.. ,d1N11.1kNhill.a101 IId J. 1L0.1 fill .!J..IL 11... restored to be consistent with the Restorative Landscape Plan included in the master plan amendment. Parcel D (7.6 acres): The property is an inholding with 140 of frontage on County Rd. 17. The site contains a residence and related improvements. The property separates a 2 1/2 acre parcel of park land, also having frontage on County Rd. 17, from the main body of the park. The residence should be removed and the vegetation restored to be consistent with the Restorative Landscape Plan included in the master plan amendment. The plan further recommends that the county acquire two parcels, E and F, flanking the east and west sides of Keats Ave. N. Ownership of the parcels would allow the Parks Division to manage the lands in a manner consistent with the park reserve and bring an expression of the park character and image to the math entrance at the intersection of Keats Ave. and 10th Street N. If native vegetation is established on the sites, motorists approaching on 10th Street or on Keats Ave. will view a sample of the park environs as opposed to the residential developments to the east and west on 10th Street. The native landscape would also be consistent with prairie plantings maintained by the Parks Division in the Keats Ave. median south of 10th Street. The properties are shown on Figure ? and are described as follows: Parcel E (16 1/2 acres): The site contains a residence and related improvements. It has 550 feet of frontage on 10th Street North and 1,340 feet on Keats Avenue North. The residence should be removed and the vegetation restored to be consistent with the Restorative Landscape Plan. Parcel F (10 acres): The site contains a residence and is largely disturbed with no significant natural resources. It has 660 feet of frontage on 10th Street North and 660 feet on Keats Avenue North. The residence should be removed and the vegetation restored to be consistent with the Restorative Landscape Plan. There are several methods for land conveyance to county ownership. The following might be considered for acquisition of the identified properties: Fee simple: The outright purchase of full title and all rights by the county from the land owner. The transaction is generally handled with a negotiated purchase agreement that is based on an appraisal of the full market value of the land. Firsi right of refusal: A contract between a landowner and the county which provides that, if the landowner chooses to sell, it must offer the land first to the county. Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment- Washington County 6.2 I�roci C d a:1 quickly as hilt II In addition the land ,kiln construct the tniil park, 1"1 .' Slab" or i ur(k rl) agreement, in - 11 hapter nil the owner may continue to uecul)l° the ', lifetintr. 0 vill require the county to execute an Lake Eltno Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - ashin t n aunty kBoundaries and c uii ion 6.3 hapter even - anigatug'yg:meat2aolog.bmiZawe4444;164,,,'N' '"'' Chapter 7: Park Operations and Management a ions an anase ent 444,444444444Y4444,4 40444,4,44,•44m44.444444.44,44"4 44404. ,o4.4.4444,..44 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - Washington County 1,1 Chapter Seven - Park perations and n gement l NIV,,' InVoth'ZZ A,L+G',,x,51 .6it.'!d'+' Lake Elmo Park Reserve Master Plan Amendment - hington County 7.2 New Residential New Commercial Other Residential Other Commercial Nove er-ZU115 Permits Issued 2 0 22 6 Summary Building Report Valuation $2,423,000.00 $0.00 $73,925.00 $331,600,00 Total 30 $2,828,525.00 Total Building Fees Collected • Plumbing $33,671.83 Summary Plumbing Report 11 $130,900.00 Total Plumbing Fees Collected I $904.50 HVAC SummaryHVAC Report, 10 Total HVAC Fees Collected Summary Grand Total Fees Surcharge Fee Paid to State SAC Fees Paid to Met Council WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale Misc. Expenses Total Fees Retained Credit Fees to Bldg Credit Fees to Water Credit Fees to Sewer $73,245.00 $655.00 $35,231.33 $1,419.74 $33,811.59 $29,836.59 $3,900.00 $75.00 New Residential a New Commercial em, to' Uate Permits Issued Valuation 19 $10,552,741.00 8 $4,522,600.00 Other Residential 317 $4,469,921.00 Other Commercial 44 $1,142,657.00 Total 388 $20,687,919.00 Total Building Fees Collected $286,558.03 I I o Plumbing Summary Plumbing Report 75 $1,099,678.00 Total Plumbing Fees Collected $5,826.00 HVAC Summary HVAC Report 92 $733,900.00 Tota HVAC Fees Collected I $7,794,40 Summary Grand Total Fees Surcharge Fee Paid to State 1SAC Fees Paid to Met Council WAC Fees Paid to Oakdale Misc. Expenses Total Fees Retained Credit Fees to Bldg Credit Fees to Water Credit Fees to Sewer $300,178.43 $10,228.08 $1,450.00 $500.00 $0.00 $288,000.35 I $260,330.35 $26,600.00 $1,025.00 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-135 A RESOLUTION RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING A HEARING ON TEE WATER SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION — PHASE IV PROJECT WHEREAS, a feasibility report has been prepared by TKDA with reference to the Water Systems Interconnection Phase IV Project, and this report was received by the City Council on December 6, 2005. WHEREAS, the report provides information regarding whether the proposed project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA: The Lake Elmo City Council will consider the Water Systems Interconnection Phase IV Project in accordance with the report and the assessment of abutting property for all or a portion of the cost of the improvement pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Chapter 429 at an estimated cost of the improvement of $494,310.00. 2. A Public Hearing has been ordered on said Water Systems Interconnection Phase IV Project on the 17th day of January, 2006 at Lake Elmo City Hall, 7:00 p.m. add the clerk shall give mailed and published notice of such hearing and improvement as required by law. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council this 6th day of December, 2006. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Resol Water Systems Interconnection Phase IV Project .16 TKDA ENGINEERS :AFi61-11TECTS • PLANNERS SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA FEASIBILITY REPORT WATER SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION PHASE IV CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.008 DECEMBER 6, 2005 I hereby certify that this Feasibility Report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Professional Engineer under the laws of the State of Minnesota. iTTomas D. PrOv, P.E. License No. 19621 13186.008 SECTION I. SECTION 11. SECTION III, SECTION IV. SECTION V. SECTION VI, SECTION VII. SECTION VIII. WATER SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION PHASE IV CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA PROJECT NO. 13186.008 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE NO. INTRODUCTION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS 1 RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS ......... ....... ............... ......1 PERMITS 1 ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS..... ........... ..... ....... ..... ........... 2 FINANCING OF IMPROVEMENTS 2 PROJECT ASSESSMENTS 2 PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE ........ ,..,... ....... ............ .... ....... 3 STATEMENT OF FEASIBILITY .................... ........ 3 APPENDIX PAGES LOCATION MAP 1 ESTIMATES OF PROBABLE COST 1 PRELIMINARY PLANS 7 ASSESSMENT SUMMARY ........ ...... .....,.,,............. ...... .........„ ....... ............ . 1 13186.008 WATER SYSTEMS INTERCONNECTION PHASE IV CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA . INTRODUCTION AND PROPOSED IMPROVEMENTS The City of Lake Elmo has undertaken a Project to build an elevated water storage tank at the new Public Works site near the intersection of Ideal Avenue and TH 5. A trunk watermain is necessary to connect the water tower to the remainder of the water system. To accomplish this, a 16-inch watermain is required from the water tower to the intersection of CSAH 6 and TH 5. This watermain would lie in the south boulevard of TH 5. A jacked crossing of TH 5 would be needed near the water tower. There are a few commercial properties along TH 5 that will receive a benefit and will have the ability to connect to this watermain. This Report was initiated by the City Council. Preliminary Plans are located in the Appendix. IL RIGHTS -OF -WAY AND EASEMENTS All other work will be done by permit in County and State rights -of -ways. III. PERMITS A Utility Permit from the Minnesota Department of Transportation (Mn/DOT) for work in the TH 5 right -of way will be necessary. A Utility Permit from Washington County for work in the CSAH 6 right-of-way is required. A permit from the Minnesota Department of Health is needed for a watermain extension and elevated tank construction. A permit is required from the Valley Branch Watershed District for erosion control. 13186.008 IV. ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS A detailed cost estimate is located in the Appendix. Estimated Construction Cost Engineering Total Project Cost V. FINANCING OF IMPROVEMENTS $ 449,310.00 $ 45,000.00 $ 494,310,00 The improvements are planned to be financed entirely by a Water Availability Charge (WAC) and assessments. A bond for this Project was sold in 2005. VI. PROJECT ASSESSMENTS Property appraisals were performed by Scott Renne to determine the increase in market value for the properties that abut the trunk watermain along the south side of TH 5. It is proposed to assess these benefiting properties the full amount of that increase in property value. Although this method is rarely used, this is an allowed method of assessment under the City Assessment Policy. The appraisal resulted in a recommended rate of $2,340,00 per acre for the unplatted property, and $2,755 per unit for the 14 office condos already platted. Preliminary Assessment Roll PID Gross Area Net Area Assessment (Acres) (Acres) ($2,3401AC) 16-029-21-24-0001 54.9 53.0 $ 124,020.00 16-029-21-42-0002 2.0 2.0 $ 4,680.00 16-029-21-42-0005 1.2 1.2 $ 2,808.00 16-029-21-42-0003 6.0 6.0 $ 14,040.00 16-029-21-42-0004 2.1 2.1 $ 4,914.00 16-029-21-42-0001 2.6 2.1 $ 4,914.00 16-029-21-43-0001 3.6 1.8 $ 4,212.00 16-029-21-43-0006 4.4 4.0 $ 9,360.00 2 13186.008 PID 16-029-21-41-0026 16-029-21-41-0025 16-029-21-41-0024 16-029-21-41-0023 16-029-21-41-0022 16-029-21-41-0021 16-029-21-41-0017 16-029-21-41-0018 16-029-21-41-0015 16-029-21-41-0016 16-029-21-41- 16-029-21-41- 16-029-21-41- 16-029-21-41- Address 8921 Hwy 5 8925 H 8931 H 8935 Hwy 5 8941 Hwy 5 8945 Hwy 5 8971 Hwy 5 8975 Hwy 5 8981 Hwy 5 8985 Hwy 5 8955 Hwy 5 8951 Hwy 5 8995 Hwy 5 8991 Hwy 5 5 VII. PROPOSED PROJECT SCHEDULE City Council Receives Feasibility Report City Council Conducts Public Hearing, Approves Project, and Authorizes Plan Preparation for Phase IV Phase IV Work begins Phase IV Work Complete VII1. STATEMENT OF FEASIBILITY Owner Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Settevig Heaney Enterp, 8935 Prairie Ridge LLC Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Dennis & Sandra Grabowski Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev, Lake Elmo Land Dev. Lake Elmo Land Dev. Assessment $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 2,755.00 $ 207,518.00 December 6, 2005 January 17, 2006 Spring 2006 Spring 2006 This Project is feasible and necessary and should be completed as described in this Report. 13186.008 APPENDIX TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS CITY OF LAKE ELMO -DONALD JOAN E TALiE 160291,4 390,o_ WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PHASE IV FIGURE NO. 1 LOCATION MAP PROJECT NO. 13186.008 ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE Project: WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION Comm. No: 13186 Location: PHASE IV Date: 11/29/2005 Street: By: RDJ For: CITY OF LAKE ELMO Sheet: ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION UNIT QUANTITY COST UNIT EXTENSION MOBILIZATION LS 1 $20,000.00 $20,000.00 SALVAGE & REINSTALL CULVERT PIPE LF 40 $25.00 $1,000.00 REMOVE CURB & GUTTER LF 32 $5.00 $160.00 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 210 $4.00 $840.00 REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 186 $3.00 $558.00 SUPPORT PETROLEUM PIPELINE CROSSING LS 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 SUPPORT TELEPHONE DUCT/CABLE CROSSING EA 3 $300.00 $900.00 CONNECT TO EXIST. 16" WATERMAIN EA 1 $2,000.00 $2,000.00 JACK/AUGER 30" STEEL CASING LF 173 $200.00 $34,600.00 16" DIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN LF 4860 $50.00 $243,000.00 16" MJDIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN IN CASING PIPE LF 200 $48.00 $9,600.00 6" DIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN LF 82 $35.00 $2,870.00 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX EA 4 $2,000.00 $8,000,00 6" GATE VALVE & BOX EA 3 $700.00 $2,100.00 HYDRANT EA 3 $2,200.00 $6,600.00 DIP WATERMAIN FITTINGS LB 1513 $5.00 $7,565.00 SILT FENCE LF 658 $2.50 $1,645.00 B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER LF 32 $8.50. $272.00 CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE TN 130 $15,00 $1,950.00 2350 TYPE LV 3 NON -WEARING COURSE TN 25 $65.00 $1,625.00 2350 TYPE LV 4 WEARING COURSE TN 25 $65,00 $1,625.00 TOPSOIL CY 1640 $25.00 $41,000.00 SEED & WOOD FIBER BLANKET SY 20000 $3.00 $60,000.00 FLAG PERSON HR 20 $20.00 $400.00 SUB TOTAL $449,310.00 I MAHTO E OAKDALE I/ n 9 E.! E PINE SPRI Long Lake 3.10 tA, WV 41. At .1 W. SI. Olson Loke Lak MOrdrevlIIe Fele.INc Union 51, OAK DALE < 0 EXISTING UTILITY LOCATIONS THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING UNDERGROUND UTILITY LOCATIONS AND ELEVATIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION. ALL INPLACE UTILITIES MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON THIS PLAN & THOSE THAT ARE SHOWN, MAY NOT BE SHOWN IN THE EXACT LOCATIONS. THE SUBSURFACE UTILITY INFORMATION IN THIS PLANSET IS UTILITY QUALITY LEVELS "O' 'D" AS DEFINED IN ASCE "STANDARD GUIDELINE FOR THE DEPICTION OF EXISTING SUBSURFACE UTILITY DATA". GOPHER STATE ONE CALL: 1-800-252-1166 GRANT 'st LakeJane PATICIt MR REM Eagle F'oint` La ke \\\ Gone La WOODBURY ,7 alit co REGIONAL PAM RESERvE .44aOkaL__ 0 8 9 Lckej Elmo Pt. GRANT et . 3110 st Troller Court Horse h e Lake ^^ ^ WOODBURY CITY OF LAKE ELMO SPECIFICATION REFERENCE THE 2000 EDITION OF THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION 'STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION", AND ALL AMENDMENTS THERETO, SUPPLEMENTAL SPECIFICATIONS, AND THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR SANITARY SEWER, STORM DRAIN AND WATERMAIN INSTALLATIONS' AS PROPOSED DY THE CITY ENGINEERS ASSOCIATION OF MINNESOTA, MS EDITION. STI LLWATER OAK PARK HEIGHTS ove,c1 Lqk Loko Elrno Airport CITY OF LAKE ELMO WATER SYSTEM INTFRCONNECTION PHASE IV PROJECT NO. 13186.000 ------ PROJECT 4 LOCATION IN. V 0 2000 4000 SCALE IN FEET SHEET 1 DRAWING INDEX DESCRIPTION TITLE SHEE'T 2 ESTIMATED QUANTITIES & LEGEND 3 DETAILS 4-7 3411) ST. N. (HWY 5) - Jamoen Ave. N. To 780' E Of Idea Ave. N. WATERMAIN PLAN & PROFILES THIS PLAN SET CONTAINS 7 SHEETS I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA THOMAS D. PREW DATE x/xx /2005 LIC, NC. 19621 TKDA ENGINEERS. ARCI-IITECTS •PLANNERS 6 rfo EXISTING LEGEND CONDITIONS AND REMOVALS 1361asu = 4attc_aurta_ _ - — — — *12. Orr 0 — w -*4 —G — E — T —Tv w_ G— E— T — TV— PD1&1e1e2OrK1s.11190D40.124S6&111 vezzAwmov.,;! Z..11.111.11:11;1:111.1 .._q_ El 0 0 PROPOSED EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST, EXIST. EXIST. EXIST. EXIST, RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPERTY LINE CONC. CURB AND GUTTER CURB (TYPE AS NOTED) EDGE OF BIT. SURFACE EDGE OF GRAVEL SIDEWALK (TYPE AS NOTED) POWER POLE, GUY LIGHT POLE, HAND HOLE TREE CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE RETAINING WALL BUILDING SANITARY SEWER STORM SEWER (12-36") STORM SEWER (> 42") MANHOLE CATCHBASIN WATERMAIN EXIST. HYDRANT, GATE VALVE EXIST. GAS MAIN EXIST. BURIED ELECTRIC EXIST. ELECTRIC BOX EXIST, BURIED TELEPHONE EXIST. TELEPHONE PEDESTAL EXIST. BURIED CABLE TELEVISION REMOVE\ REPLACE CURB & GLITTER REMOVE\REPLACE CURB REMOVE\REPLACE CONC, SIDEWALK REMOVE\ REPLACE CONC. DRIVEWAY REMOVE\REPLACE BIT. PAVEMENT COLD MILL BIT. PAVEMENT REMOVE TREE REMOVE SANITARY SEWER PIPE REMOVE SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE REMOVE STORM SEWER PIPE REMOVE CATCH BASIN, MANHOLE CONSTRUCTION RIGHT-OF-WAY PROPERTY LINE CURB & GUTTER CURB (TYPE AS NOTED) CONC. DRIVEWAY (THICKNESS AS NOTED) CONC. SIDEWALK(PED, RAMP AS NOTED) SANITARY SEWER SANITARY SEWER SERVICE WATERMAIN WATER SERVICE STORM SEWER MANHOLE CATCHBASIN ADJUST MANHOLE CHAIN LINK FENCE WOOD FENCE RETAINING WALL BITUMINOUS DRIVE BITUMINOUS SURFACING SILT FENCE KIR MMMMM •••••••••••••H NO. DATE DY DESCRIPTION OF REVS10145 STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED QUANTITIES ITEM SPEC. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 I 42 I 43 I 44 L ITEM MOBILIZATION SALVAGE & REINSTALL CULVERT PPE REMOVE CURB & GUI I ER SAVVCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT REMOVE BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SUPPORT PETROLEUM PIPELINE CROSSING !SUPPORT HIGH PRESSURE GAS PIPELINE CROSSING ISUPPORT TELEPHONE CIUCT/CABLE CROSSING CONNECT TO EMT. 6'WATERMAIN JACK/AUGER 30" STEEL CASING 16" DIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN 16" MJDIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN IN CASING PIPE 6" DIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN 16" BUI IERFLY VALVE & BOX 6" GATE VALVE & BOX HYDRANT DIP WATERMAIN FITTINGS SILT FENCE CLASS 5 AGGREGATE BASE 12350 TYPE LV 3 NON -WEARING COURSE 12350 TYPE LV 4 WEARINGCOURSE TOPSOIL SEED & WOOD FIBER BLANKET FLAG PERSON UNIT LS LF LF LF SY LS EA EA EA LF LF LF LF EA EA EA LB LF TN TN TN CY SY HR DESIGNED DRAWN TDP PJW CHECKED TDP I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED GO PE (Vi UNDER HY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I ALI A DULY LICENSED PRETESSIORAL ENGINEER UNDER THE IAWS DF THE STATE DE HINNESOLA NOVAS O. PREW DATE /2005 LIG. NC. I 4621 TKDA ENGINEERSiARCHIFEbiS.PLAI\JNER ATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION PHASE IV LAKE ELMO CLIENT NO. GSA NO, MINNESOTA QUANTITY 40 32 210 186 1 1 3 1 173 4860 200 82 4 3 a 1513 658 130 25 25 1640 20000 20 LEGEND ESTIMATED QUANTITIES SHFFT nr 7 currro PROJECT 60. 13186.000 RECORO 60, 5 A tiu METAL OR 2"x7W000 FENCE POST GEOTEKTILE WITH NET BACKING BACKFI GEOTEKTILE TO OVERLAP THROUGH TRENCH. NOTE : -SILT FENCE SHALL CONFORM TO MNDOT 3866, TYPE B. -FENCING SHALL BE PLACED ALONG CONTOURS OR AS DIRECTED BY ENGINEER. COMPACTED BACKFILL COMPACTED SAND OR PIT RUN GRANULAR MATERIAL COMPACTED BACKFILL GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING EARTH FOUNDATION PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS DESIGNED DRAWN TDP PW CHECKED TDP "jNOE SILT FENCE —\\ 4VALVE NUT EXTENSION 1/4" STEEL GATE - VALVE ADAPTOR W/ PROTECTIVE COATING AS MANUFACTORED BY ADAPTOR, INC, OR EQUAL 1 RUBBER GASKET INSTALLED BETWEEN THE GATE VALVE AND GATE VALVE ADAPTOR, GATE VALVE ADAPTOR I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED DV ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION MO THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA THOMAS D. FREW DATE /2005 LIG. ND. 19621 13/w UTILITY ESMT. RIGHT OF WAY (VARIES) VAR. 2' 2' VAR. VAR, , 2' 2' VAR, R/W UTILITY ESMT. — 2" MNDOT 2340, TYPE 41A BIT. WEARING COURSE *ADD 0.3% OIL ABOVE JMF 7 MNDOT 2340, TYPE 32A BIT. BASE COURSE 17 AGGREGATE BASE, CLASS 5A OR 6A (100% RECYCLED) NOTES - TEST ROLL OF SUBGRADE AND AGGREGATE BASE SHALL BE WITNESSED AND APPROVED BY CITY ENGINEER. TYPICAL STREET SECTION PATCHING CURB COVER AS SPECIFIED 3' TKDA ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS WATERMAIN GATE VALVE & BOX ---BACK OF CURB 4' VALVE NUT EXTENSION VARIES 24" xei. XIS" CONCRETE BLOCK TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT (VALVE IN STREET) PROP, LINE z 7.3 COVER WITH /- PLASTIC (3 MIL) CONCRETE BLOCK REACTION BACKING 1/2" WASHED ROCK ALL AROUND MIN. 1/3 C.V. (MIN. 1 C.V. IN IMPERVIOUS SOILS) WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECTION PHASE IV LAKE ELMO MINNESOTA PLAN PLAN DISTURBED SOIL UNDISTURBED SOIL (FOR BENDS) z en n- UNDISTURBED SOIL SECTION SECTION NOTE: COVER FITTINGS WITH PLASTIC (4 MIL) PRIOR TO POURING CONCRETE 2500 PSI CONCRETE 28 DAY STRENGTH (FOR TEES ) CONCRETE REACTION BACKING DETAILS N, 6' MIN. PROJECT NO 13186.000 RECOND NO. ATE HY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS CLIENT NO, I MSA NO Qi-irrr Kin 7 nr." *-1 "I 1 930 920 910 900 0. 1 890 185_000\muni\LL 6" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX, REMOVE & REPLACE BIT, PAVEMENT (SEE TYPICA SECTION -SHEET 3) REMOVE & REPLACE CURB & GUTTER (TYP.) F&C: 16"X6" TEE, G" GATE VALVE & BOX, 27LF-6"D1P WATERMAIN, HYDRANT. NOTES: 1. INSTALL SEED & WOOD FIBERIBLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING TRENCH. fl 2. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL. r SUPPORT POLE(S)-TYP. (BY OTHERS) 34th STREET T.H. NO. 5 0 ......©. .................. rr) q. DRIVE ('11,+09):: 100 150 SCALE IN FEET REMOVE EXIST. PLUG, CONNECT TO EXIST. WAT MAl F&I 1 G' BUTTERFLY VAL & F&I 16"-11.25' BEND. REMOVE & REPLACE BIT. PAVEMENT (SEE TYPICA SECTION -SHEET 3) .............. EXI T;;,;PROFILE OVE R,:WATERMAIh1,,,,,, ,'sriLGWATCR ............. 54'ACP 8' /ER ...:..•:...... CONNECT TO . , . Sr'WATERMAIN 930 920 910 900 890 DATE BY 13 12 DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS 11 10 9 8 7 6 DESIGNED DRAWN 1 HERESY CERTIFY E THAT THIS PLANSSIO WAS GI PREPARED TKDA SY ME CR UNDER .Y DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1DP PJW AMA THEY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA CHECKED X /XX/05 PREY TOP DATE LID. NO. 19621 ENGINEERS' ARC HITECTS• PLANNERS 5 4 3 2 1 0 WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PHASE IV LAKE ELMO CLIENT NO. I NSA N0. MINNESOTA 34th STREET (T.H. NO. 5) From Jamaca Ave. N. to 780' East of Ideal Ave. N. WATERMAIN SHEET NO. 4 nF 7 currrc PROJECT NO. 13186, 000 RECORD NO. 1I-l. SURFACE F&I: 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX ....oj ................. 01 4•I ........ Lo, ........ .. . : ....... .. ... EMOVE & REPLACE BIT. PAVEMENT (SEE TYPICAL SECTION -SHEET 3) BIT. SURFACE .f- X - WIRE FENCE F&I: 16 X 6" TEE, 6" GATE VALVE & BOX, 2715-6' DIP, CL.52 WATERMAIN, HYDRANT. • 1 A NOTES: 1. INSTALL SEED & WOOD FIBER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING TRENCH. 2. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL T 18 0 ! 50 100 SCALE IN FEET 34th STREET T.H. NO. 5 SUPPORT POLE(S)-TYP. (BY OTHERS) 1 150 N ..... ......... ..... ..... ...... .... ........ ........ ....... ...... ....... ......... .... .. ....... ........ ..... .. ..... .. ......... ......... ......... ....... .... ...... . ........ ....... ......... ......... ......... ........ • ,,,,,,, ......... t • t ,,,,,,,,,,,,,, • ,,,,,,,,, t , , 960 ........ • .... ......... ........... ......... ....... ......... ......... .. ........ z 950. 940 • 930 • 920 8 0 - EA ... . ....... ........... ,,, • C_ DRIVE , +68) • .... , .... ... • . : ........ .......... ... ........ ....... ,,,,, • ,,, ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... .... ...... ....... ,,,,,,, • EXIST.. PROFILE :OVER WATERMAIN ,,,,,,,,, • ,, ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, • , 8' :MIN: COVER ... (r) , 1 ......... . ...... t . £3'' MIN COVER ........ ...... .. . .... ..... ........ ... .... .... ... ... 0 '0 ,,,,, .......... 0 < .0 • ,,,,,,, ... ....... ......... ....... 26 25 BY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS ........ ......... ... ......... ......... , • ,,,,,,, 0) z < , o LLI 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 DESIGNED DRAWN TDP PJW I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR LINDER le DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF TNT STATE OF MINNESOTA CHECKED THOMAS D. PREW TDP DATE X /XX/05 Lit. NO. 19621 TKDA ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•P:ANNEF 17 16 15 14 13 WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PHASE IV LAKE ELMO WENT NO 0 MINNESOTA 34th STREET (T.H. NO, 5) From Jamaca Ave. N. to 780' East of Ideal Ave. N. WATERMAIN urn- kin g Plc '7 Jr. 960 950 940 930 920 PROJECT NO, 13186.000 RECORD NO. crt 1000 990 ......... 980 I 970 5 960 8 et I to uJ z „ .......... SuRFWL SUPPORT HIGH PRESSURE GAS PIPEUNE CROSSIJG 5 SUPPORT PIPELINE 34th STREET T.H. NO. 5 PETROLEUM ROSSING ••• NOTES: 1. INSTALL SEED dz WOOD FIBER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING TRENCH. 2. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL. SET. SURFACE SUPPORT POLE(S)— (BY OTHERS) 8 S 100 1 0 SCALE IN FEET ... ...... "..t ..... ......... ..... • ... ......... ........ . ..... • . ........ ........ .... ... ......... ... .... . t ...... ... ........ .. t t ..... ...... ... 1 :•:' ':':':':' ° I .... ... 0 ...... : : ........ "ch . ... . . . ...... .... : : .... .... .... ..... : : : ..... t t ..... .... .. : ......... ......... ......... ......... .... .... .... .... : .... .... t t : : ... . ...... ...... ...... ...... : .... . • .... ... ..... .... • • . ...... ....... .... ... ... ........ ....... ...... ...... .. .... ..... • ' ........ • ...... ...... ...... ...... ..... . : : ...... .... • , ...... ...... ....... ... .... ... .... .... ....... .. ... ....... ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ ........ . ............ t ....... ........ • • • t t t ...... : ' ......... : : ",c( ...... ....... ... .... ............ .... : . : . ..... ..... .... ... ............ ...... ... " " ..... " " ' ... " " ... , ... ....... ......... ......... ...... ' • ' ...... ..... ...... : : : ......... ......... ......... ......... ......... ............ ...... ...... " ......... ......... ..... , .... , • 39 38 37 36 35 .... DESIGNED DRAWN I HERFEnr Guar?' THAT THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER WY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT TOP PJW I AM A DULY LICENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER NE LAWS OF THE STAlE OF MINNESOTA CHECKED THOMAS 0, pREW TDP GATE /XX/05 LIC. NO, 1RR21 . ......, ........ ..... ..... ........ ......... :F$115EILE :OVM 7— ......... ' : : ..... : : : : : " .... : ........ : „ ...... . , .. , .... : : : : : : .... -,•:,.....:,: : . : : : : : : ...... : : ....... ............ ... ............... : : ........ ..... .............. : : ........... : : : : : : ........... : ...... : ...... ...... ..... ......... !R),,„(AH .... : ........ : .... : : .. . ..... . . ...... : : ... ' ' ......... . ....... APPROX: LOD. ..... ........ ...... " Irmpturtir tmir.t) ....... ..... ......... ...... : . ....... ........ ............ ....... .............. ....... ..... . , .............. : .... ......... : : ...... : .... „ „ ..... cr4,, ...... ...... ........ : : ............. : : ............ : ............... ............ ....... ........ ....... ....... ..... ..... ........ ........ .. t ......... ........ .... ..... ..".... ...... .. . ........ .. , ..... t .... t .... .......... • B .:MIN...: ....... : ......... . . ..... . ....... ; • : • • • t- . : ... : . ...... .............. • : ::::::: : : : ...... ... ........ ......... ....... t . ....... t . ..... ... t ... .... .. ... ....... ....... .... t., . ... ...... ........ ...... . , ........ .... t .. ... ... ...... t t ...... • . ..... ..... . to.' ... . .. ... ... !":"•:*: . . . . to .... " .. ..... : : " " ' ...... : . : . : . . : . :• : : . ....... ' " .... ....... .............. : ' • 'EL .. : : .. ' " " • ' ...... .... " ... ... ... ... ... ... ......... ..... ..... ... .... .... .... ... : : : ..... .... ..1. ..... .... ........ ..... ..... .... , .. •:*:•:"•• ................ .... ................ ................ ................ ..... ........ : : : ........ ,,,,tt, . ...... 1., ... ....... ........ ..... . .. ... ...... . : . . .1., .... ...... ..... ....... • ...... co .... .... 0,1 . ".•:""•• ' ...... '"" • .... . ..... — . .... .... .... „ „ ..... . , 34 33 32 31 30 29 WATER SYS fEM INTERCONNECT PHASE IV TKDA ..... t ..... .... .... ... . : . t 1 , .. ..... : ...... ....... .... , ...... ... ...... ... 28 27 26 34th STREET (T.H. NO. 5) From Jamaca Ave. N. to 780' East of Ideal Ave. N. LAKE ELMO MINNESOTA WATERMAIN CLOT NO 1 0, SHEFT NO. R nF 7 gl-IFFTg .... 1000 990 980 970 960 PROJECT NO. 13186.000 RECORD NO, NO. DATE BY DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS ENGINEERS•NTHITECTS•PLANNERS G.' ...111111111110.11.1 1020 JACK/AUGER 17315 30" STEEL CASING. SEE RIGHT I I I t 01 KUTURE\ VQ&ER TOYER/ PUBLIC WOKS FA&IL I r ' 1 PUTURE 1,6" k. DIP \ . , tr. TEE, w4,8.,FLUt T 6" 13U1TERFLY-, V.AyE , BOX, 16" PLUG, 34th STREET CROSSING SEE LEFT - 08. BIT. SOW ACE cm, suRrAcr, 16" X 6" CROSS, 16" x 6" REDUCER, 6" GATE VALVE & BOX, 2615-6" DIP WATERMAIN, HYDRANT. NOTES; 1. INSTALL SEED & WOOD FIRER BLANKET IMMEDIATELY AFTER BACKFILLING TRENCH. 2. CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH TRAFFIC CONTROL PLAN FOR APPROVAL. + -I 34th STREET T.H. NO. 5 0 1 i 1 1 50 WO SCALE IN FEET : .. ....... ...... : .... ...... . ..... . 1 . ....... : .... ... : ... ..... : .... : : ...... ........ ......... ........ ........ : : ..... . .. . ....... t ..... ..... ....... : : ....... : ...... .... ...... ... • ,,,,, .. . ...... ... .......... . : . .... ER.LA4ES.. . . . . ' . ..... .. : CROP, . . WAT.ER6,1AN, ..... .... ... EXIST.' PROFILE OVER WATERMAIN ,,0 1 000 990 g 980 5 EA ... ....... ...... .. .. ...... , .... ... ..... 0 0% '. MIN, COVER " : . ... ..... , ........ : ..... ... : : .. : : : . ...... ...... , ,,,,, ......... ... X STING :T.: PROFILE :OVER WATERMAIN „ COVER .. ............ t . : . ... ....... ........ F&F 1200LF116" MjDIP, PLUG. :VALVE • , ,,,,,,,, ,,, 0.0% 086EF:4-1:6":DIP; : CL:52. 'WATERMAIN: CL 52 • WATERMAIN : °CASING . : ....... ........... • Xr 'STEEL: CASING ........... ' • :UN :68LF:16'DIP: :CL.524ATi4IAIRi.:. • ,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,, • ,,,,,,, • ,,,,,,,, ........ ..... , ......... ..... ...... .... ............ ....... ....... .. ... ...... t ..... .... . ....... .... ... ... ......... ......... ........ ........ .... ... . ... ....... . • ,,,,,, , • . • ,,,,,,,,,,, ME BY 46 47 DESCRIPTION OF REVISIONS 48 49 DEStONED DRAWN I HEREBY CERTIFY TlikI THIS PLAN WAS PREPARED BY ME OR CHDER MY DIRECT SUPERYtSION ANO THAT TDP PJW I AM A DULY LICENSEE PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER 11111 LAWS OF THE STAIE Cr CHECKED THOMAS D. FREW TDP DATE X/XX /o5 IA. NO 19621 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCH(TE6TS. PLANNEIRS WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PHASE IV LAKE ELMO CLIENT 140 MINNESOTA 34th STREET (T.H. NO. 5) From Jamaca Ave. N. to 780' East of Ideal Ave. N. WATERMAIN hin 7 nr 7 CUM -re 1020 1010 1000 9?1-) 980 PROJECT NO. 13185.000 RECORD NO SUMMARY OF IMPORTANT FACTS AND CONCLUSIONS Area of consulting study: A mixed use neighborhood in the western portion of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. The properties are a large vacant land parcel, 14 office condominium units, two small commercial parcels and a small vacant land parcel. All properties front upon State Highway #5 aka 34th Street North between Ideal Avenue North and Stillwater Boulevard North in the western portion of Lake Elmo. Function: The function of this consulting assignment is to estimate the affect on market value, if any, for the subject parcels in the study arca from the "before status" which is being located in a neighborhood without city water service with the "after status" being an area that is served by a city water system. Effective date of value estimates: October 2, 2005 Zoning: Zoning districts in the study area include RR - Rural Residential and HB, Highway Business PID Calculation for Total Project Area in acres $470,000 4- 200.89 acres = $2,340 per acre Extension on a per Parcel Basis; note there are some differences in totals due to rounding 16-029-21-24-0001 175.80 x $2,340 -- $411,372 16-029-21-42-0002 2.05 x $2,340 - $4,797 16-029-21-42-0005 0.63 x $2,340 .= $1,474 16-029-21-42-0003 5.93 x 82,340 = $13,876 16-029-21-41-0027 (parent) 15.50 + .07 x 14 = 16.48 x $38,563 ($2,755 per unit) 14 office condos; Common area parcel is excluded from the per parcel calculation Page 5 DA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffrey PI. 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, IV1N 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-9083 Fax www,tkda,com To: Lake Ehno City Council Reference: Street Light Installation CSAH 10 and CSAH 19 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Proj. No.: 13267.000 From: Thomas Prew, P. E. Routing: Date: December 1, 2005 Copies To: Washington County is requesting that we enter an agreement to place a street light at the intersection of CSAH 10 and CSAH 19, near the entrance to the Park Reserve. Because of the size of the intersection, two lights may be necessary to adequately light it. This standard agreement calls for the County to prepare the plans and the City to pay for the electricity and maintenance. I recommend approval of this agreement with the stipulation that the light is a shoe box style or cut-off cobra head that meets City Code. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity 1342 TKDR 651 292 0063 P.02 WASHINGTON COUNTY AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF CSAH 10 (10th Street North) AND CSAH 19 (Keats Avenue North) WASHINGTON COUNTY CONTRACT No, WO DEPT. Trensportalio,n &Rinker Develoomen1 DIVISION Transpaldon TERM Saltatribgr_l. MO -perpetual THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into by and between the County of Washington, a political subdivision of the State of Minnesota, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as the "City WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, it is considered mutually desirable to install street lighting et the intersection of: Washington County State Aid Highway 10 (10th Street North) and Washington County State Aid Highway 19 (Keats avenue North). WHEREAS, the County and City will share in the cost, maintenance, and operation of the street lighting as hereinafter set forth. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. The County shall prepare any necessary plans, specifications, and proposals and shall perform the engineering and inspection for the installation of this street lighting subject to the City's concurrence. In addition, if the construction of the project is contracted, the County shall bear the cost of constructing the street lighting. If the work is not contracted, the County shall bear the cost of all labor, materials, and equipment rental required to complete the work, and the City shall be responsible for the cost of bringing the power supply to the service pole, 2. The County shall install or cause the installation of street lighting et the following intersection: Washington County State Aid Highway 10 (10th Street North) and Washington County State Aid Highway 19 (Keats Avenue North), 3. Lights shall be Installed on existing utility poles, If possible. 4, The City shall provide necessary electrical power for the operation at the cost and expense of the City. Upon completion of the work contemplated herein, the City shall maintain and keep in repair the street lighting. The County shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the City and all of its agents and employees of and from any and all claims, demands, actions or causes of action arising out of, or by reason of, the negligent performance by the County of this agreement. The City shall indemnify, defend, and hold harmless the County, Its officers, agents and employees, against any and all claims, actions or causes of action arising out of the negligent performance by the City of this agreement. Page 1 of 2 13:43 TKDA 651 292 @@63 P.33 7. Any and all persons engaged in the aforesaid work to be performed by the County shall not be considered employees of the City, and any and all claims that may or might arise under the Workman's Compensation Act of this State on behalf of said employees while so engaged, and any and all claims made by any third party as a consequence of any eat or omission on the part of said employees while so engaged on any of the work contemplated herein shall not be the obligation and responsibility of the City. The County shall not be responsible under the Workman's Compensation Act for any employees of the City, IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have hereunto set their hands and seals. WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF LAKE ELMO Myra Peterson Chair, Board of Com James R. Schug County Administrator n Recommended for approval: Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director/County Engineer Approved as to form; As County Atto y NAwo naorronrotuai, Etrro &me Ugtrl 10-14,aoc Date Mayor Date Date City Administrator Date Cage 2 of 2 TOTAL P. 03 CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA REVISED AUTHORIZATION FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO: Toltz, King, Duvall, Anderson and Associates, Incorporated 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Si. Paul, Minnesota 55101 Pursuant to our Agreement dated February 2, 1988, you are hereby authorized to proceed with the professional services described as follows: CIVIL DEFENSE SIRENS PROJECT DESCRIPTION The City of Lake Elmo will provide Civil Defense coverage to that portion of the City not presently covered, in accordance with the Fire Protection Needs Study done by DSU Research dated March 2005. II. SERVICES TO BE PROVIDED BY TKDA TKDA is requested to provide plans and specifications suitable for bidding, permits and construction administration for six civil defense/fire sirens. IIT. ADDITIONAL SERVICES If the need for Additional Services is determined, and the fee for the additional work is agreeable and the City authorizes such services in writing, TKDA shall furnish same. These Additional Services shall be compensated for on an Hourly Rate basis as defined in Agreement Article 3, a part hereof, and such compensation shall be over and above any maximums or lump sum amounts set forth in this Authorization. A. These Additional Services could include: 1. Topographic Surveys and Mapping. 2. Easement Descriptions. PERIOD OF SERVICE TKDA will start services promptly upon receipt of this executed Authorization and complete within six months. V. COMPENSATION Compensation to TKDA for services provided under SECTION II of this Authorization shall be on an Hourly Rate basis as defined in Agreement Article 3, in the estimated amount of $14,626. During the course of the Project, if this estimated amount is found to be insufficient, TKDA agrees not perform services or incur costs which result in billing in excess of such amount until advised by the OWNER that additional funds are available and services can continue. Approved at a meeting of the on , 2005. By Attest Consultant Acceptance by , 2005. Authorized TKDA Representative -2- Lake Elmo City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning N . 9A Agenda Item: Final Plat, Final PUD Plan and Site Plan — United Properties Background Information for December 6, 2005: At its meeting November 28, 2005 the Planning Commission unanimously adopted a motion to recommend approval of these concurrent applications to create a 3.7 acre lot as Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition arid construct a 30,000 square foot office building at the northwest corner of Hudson Blvd. and Eagle Point Blvd. The site will be next door and to the east of the recently completed Credit Union. Staff review of the applicant's graphics and documentation found the proposal compliant with applicable City Code and PUD Plan requirements assuming the applicant will adjust the location of the building a few feet easterly (to overcome a setback variance) and submit a photometric plan for the exterior lighting of the site. The applicant has agreed to adjust the building location; and, (even though the photometric plan will be required prior to building permit issuance) the applicant's fixture and pole plans for the exterior lighting appear to be of a design that will meet the maximum foot candle requirements of the Code. The Commission's recommendation is subject to the 7 conditions reflected in the attached draft resolution for approval. Action items: 1,3 Motion to adopt Resolution #2005 — approving the Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition, and a Final PUD Plan and Site Plan for a 30,000 square foot office building on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition. Attachments: V.3cd 1. Draft Resolution #2005 - , Approving Final Plat, Final PUD Plan and Site Plan 2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of November 28 3. Planning Staff Report 4, Applicant's Documentation and Graphics Person resionsib Ci Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-136 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE FINAL PLAT AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT FOR EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 5th ADDITION WHEREAS, at its September 4, 2001 meeting, the City Council reviewed and approved the Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 2nd Addition, creating Outlot A. WHEREAS, Outlot A was further divided with the plat for Eagle Point Business Park 4th Addition, WHEREAS, at its November 28, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission recommended approval of the Final Plat, Final PUD Plan and Site Plan to create a 3.7 acre portion of Outlot A, Eagle Point Business Park 2nd Addition. WEREAS, at its December 6, 2005 meeting, the City Council reviewed the Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition and a Final PUD Plan and Site Plan for a 30,000 square foot office building on Lot 1, Block 1, Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo does hereby approve and accept the Final Plat and Development Agreement for Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition, as the same on file with the City Administrator, based on the following conditions. Compliance with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 2. Compliance with the recommendation of the South Washington Watershed District, as found to be reasonable and practical by the City Engineer. 3. Only parking depicted by the Site Plan located specifically on Lot 1, Block 1 Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition is hereby approved. 4. Submission of a complete exterior lighting photometric plan demonstrating compliance with the City exterior lighting standards prior to issuance of a building permit. 5. Submission of a Letter of Credit equal to 100% of the site landscape improvementsguaranteeing a survival of those improvements for two growing seasons, as prescribed by Section 520 of the City Code. 6. Payment of Park Dedication Fees -in -Lieu $8,794.59 (3.669X '2,397) prior to City release of the Final Plat for recording. 7. Modification of the site plan to eliminate the setback encroachment at the southwest corner of the structure. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Eagle Point Business Park 5°' Addn DRAFT cl garage issue at the same time. A City Council resolution allowing a garage forward o a s ary structuxe will be required and setbacks from the street will have to be met. The appl ca s not present but phoned and requested tabling. Commissioner De asked if anyone has looked at suitability for the existing foundation. The Planner said a fornial ding application has not been made, and it would be reviewed at that time. The Building Offici ould look at the footings if the Commission so desires. Commissioner Pelletier said she a house this size in this neighborhood. Commissioner Armstrong said he has no he is concerned about the 60 day rule. His Council to table in light of the 60 day rule. b em with rebuilding a home in this condition, and ndation would be to deny and allow the Commissioner Lyzenga said with regional sewer cornin here will be changes that will affect the lots around the lakes. For a period of time, the cushion ould be maintained for backup septic for the neighbors. She would recommend denying ation. The Chairman opened the public hearing at 7:30 p.m. and at 7:31 he ssed the Public Hearing after nobody came forward to speak. Commissioner Deziel said we should allow the applicant the opportunity fo always take it from the table and deny it before the 60 days expire. M/S/P, Deziel/Sedro, to table per the applicant's request. VOTE: 6:3 (NAY: Arms Lyzenga, Ptacek.) Commissioners Armstrong and Deziel directed staff to notify the applicant to show up to next meeting because there is only one meeting remaining this year, and someone will make a Section 520 Site Plan and Final Plan PUD for Eagle Point 5th Addition The Planner explained that with this application, a parcel will be cut out from Outlot A of Eagle Point 4th Addition. An office building will be constructed there. There is a shared driveway with the credit union. Exterior surface for the buildings meets Code requirements. Landscaping meets Code except for one point where the right of way of Hudson Boulevard jogs, and as a consequence the structure does not meet the setback. The applicant has agreed to slide the building over 5 feet so no variance will be required. Parking space quantity is adequate. The Planner said he recommends approval based upon compliance with the City Engineer, SWWD as found to be reasonable and practical by the City Engineer, submission of a photometric lighting plan and compliance with the Code lighting standards, landscaping to survive two growing seasons, payment of park dedication fees, and modification of the building plan to correct the setback issue. M/S/P, Sedro/Roth, To recommend approval subject to conditions listed in staff report. VOTE: 9:0. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 28, 2005 2 LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Date: November 22, 2005 for the Meeting of November 28, 2005 Applicant: United Properties Investment, LLC Location: Northwest Corner of Hudson Blvd. and Eagle Point Blvd. Requested Action: Site Plan, Final PUD Plan and Plan Amendment and Final Plat Land Use Plan Guiding: Business Park Existing Zoning: BP (Business Park) Subject to an Approved PUD Plan Site History and Existing Conditions: The Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 2" Addition, creating Outlot A was approved by the City Council on September 4, 2001, Outlot A was further divided with the plat for Eagle Point Business Park 4th Addition (City and County Credit Union). The site of this application is the southeasterly 3.70 acres of Outlot A. The City had previously approved a PUD Plan encompassing the entire 120 acres of the Eagle Point Business Park, including this site. Exhibits to the PUD Plan documentation provide for allowable uses, lot specifications, master signage and. related development standards. Where the PUD does not address a particular development standard, the Business Park and other related City Code standards are applicable. A proposed departure from those standards not already addressed by the PUD Plan should be processed as a PUD Plan Amendment The site is vacant today but is subject to an cross easement for driveway access to the Credit Union site. City water and sewer services are both available to the site. Discussion and Analysis: The applicant proposes to create a 3.70 acre parcel from Eagle Point 2"d Outlot A with a replat, and receive approval of a Final PUD Plan and Section 520 Site Plan to construct a 30,000 square foot office building on the resulting site. The building will be a single story flat roof design, faced primarily with brick and glass. The accent materials (comprising less than 30% of the total surfacing) will be architectural metal (largest by percentage), stone veneer, and EFIS. In the narrative submission by the applicant it is noted that the southwest corner of the proposed structure • encroaches on the required 50 foot structure setback for a very short distance due to the increased Hudson Blvd. ROW width approaching the Inwood intersection, The applicant suggests that a zoning variance will be required to overcome this encroachment issue. Staff has subsequently conversed with the applicant on this matter and has secured the applicant's commitment to adjust the location of the building on the site by no more than 10 feet (moving to the east) to overcome the setback encroachment rather than proceed with a zoning variance. The proposed general office use of the structure and the proposed site/structure/parking specifications comply with the provisions of the approved Eagle Point Business Park PUD Plan and applicable Site Plan and Platting requirements of the City Code, including setbacks, parking, parking area landscape. No exterior lighting plan has been submitted, but the developer has indicated in the cover letter that the exterior lighting will be shoebox (90 degree cutoff) style on 25 foot standards, which should comply with the City's lighting standards. A complete illumination graphic will. be required to ensure at -grade foot candle compliance prior to building permit issuance. The applicant's graphics depicts off-street parking in addition to the 120 spaces required by Code off of the 3.7 acre proposed site to the north. We can find no explanation for these additional -parking spaces, and those spaces should not be considered a component of this application or subsequent site plan approval. Those spaces may be depicted only to demonstrate the property owner's proposed relationship between the subject site and a future development to the north (back-to-back parking). The PUD Plan -required 10 foot side yard parking setback is maintained On the subject site so no such demonstration is necessary. Findings and Reeonunendations: Based on the foregoing, staff suggests the Commission find the proposed Site Plan and Final PUD Plan complies with the standards and requirements of the City Code and the approved Eagle Point Business Park PUD Plan except as noted by recommended conditions of approval; and, that the proposed Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition complies with City Code platting requirements and the approved Preliminary/Final Plat of the Eagle Point Business Park. Planning Commission Actions Requested: Motion to recommend to the City Council that the Final Plat of Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition and the Final PUD Plan and Section 520 Site Plan for a 30,000 square foot office building on Lot 1, Block 1 of Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition be approved subject to the following: 1. Compliance with the recommendations of the City Engineer. 2. Compliance with the recommendations of the South Washington Watershed District, as found to be reasonable and practical by the City Engineer. 3 Only parking depicted by the Site Plan located specifically on Lot 1, Block 1 Eagle Point Business Park 5th Addition is hereby approved. 4. Submission of a complete exterior lighting photometric plan demonstrating compliance with the City exterior lighting standards prior to issuance of a building permit. 5 Submission of a Letter of Credit equal to 100% of the site landscape improvements guaranteeing survival of those improvements for 2 growing seasons, as prescribed by Section 520 of the City Code. 6. Payment of Park Dedication Fees -in -Lieu $8,794.59 (3.669X$2,397) prior to City release of the Final Plat for recording. 7, Modification of the Site Plan to eliminate the setback encroachment at the southwest corner of the cture. Charles E. Di11Efud, City Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2, City Engineer's Memo (If Available) 3. Applicant's Documentation • 1-94 Location Map s7conar- Ti -TON ThN 9N N flIw It211W NNW T27 R2241 1121W Ii2n Vicinity Map 1200 Scale In Feet' Th$drowinn lo Lir Nnilt are compiknon and loproWdlon ol land marplp pp Ihp, opPat In vailoui liVionlvon County ofica, Th.dInIawankl be OW lot F.01.14mr.• puipPoop calk Washington Dowdy IP npl MpaPalt/IP Oar ow intowmcia4. some, WnaNnplon Counly ntiNnyor. Krone (PI61100•BE7C Paml dIu blued nn /LUDO Iu1cn.ijo CITY 3 COUNTY CREDIT UNION EAGLE POINT T W O OFFICE 1 STORY 30,000 SF SITE NO. 10 2.36 ACRES MACHINE SHE] RESTAURANT HREMER FINANCIAL CENTER OFFICE 1 STORY 100.910 SF OUTLOT C 11.69 ACRES SfTE NO. 8 1237 ACRES EAGLE POINT OFFICE CONDOMINIUMS HIGH POINTE MEDICAL EN Or, SITE PLAN .�. 0 100' 200' 40 Y UNITED PROPERTIES EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA , MASTER SITE PLAN AC I 'l BOLAND a... ✓t4N IIL IYILL,eb pIAALI ILL UNITES PROPERTIES November 18, 2005 Mr, Charles E, Dillerud City Planner City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Subject: Eagle Point Office Center Phase II Eagle Point Business Park Dear Mr, Dillerud: I am pleased to forward to you our development application for the proposed above -referenced project. As you directed, I am forwarding to you five full size prints and one 11" x 17" set of the City Submittal Package, which includes site plan/grading plan, concept landscape plan, building elevations, signage plans, and the final plat. Also included is a copy of the Shared. Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement which will serve the subject building as it relates to the cluster of developments on the west side of the creek and the Application Fee of $925.00. We respectfully request approval of this Site Plan and Final Plat for this development. A minor variance is required for the setback of the southwest corner of the building to the property line due to a jog in the property line along the Hudson Road frontage. The following summarizes the proposed development: SITE The subject site contains approximately 3.5 acres of land located immediately east of the recently completed City and County Credit Union Building. The Phase I of Eagle Point Office Center was previously constructed to the north of Eagle Point Boulevard in 2002. United Properties anticipates additional office buildings to be located on the adjacent property to the north of the subject site. The Phase II development will share a common driveway for access off of Hudson Road, A shared Driveway Easement and Maintenance Agreement is included for your review. United Properties intends to construct the driveway in a temporary manner to the north to provide customers and tenants with an alternative access to the building. We are constructing it in a temporary condition so that it could be moved in the future subject to final building plans of later phases. As previously stated, a setback variance is required at the southwest corner of the proposed building due to a jog in the property line that is the southern boundary. The building setback requirement is 50'. However, at the southwest corner we are at 28' due to the property line jog. The green area to Hudson Boulevard does not change. 3500 American Blvd. W., Minneapolis, MN 55431 • 952.831,1000 • fax 952,893.8206 • www,uproperties.com r. Charles.E. Dillerud November 17, 2005 Page 2 IMPROVEMENTS Eagle Point Office Center Phase II is a one-story office building containing approximately 30,000 square feet. The plan includes 120 surface parking spaces. Site lighting will be 25 foot pole shoebox- style parking lot lights consistent with those in the other developments at Eagle Point Business Park, The grounds will be extensively landscaped and irrigated, and the building will have a monument sign that is consistent with the standards for the business park. Exterior materials include brick and glass with an accent of architectural metal panels and EIFS. Construction is due to commence in December and will be completed July 2006. We have met with the Watershed District and the Department of Natural Resources relative to the construction of additional ponds along the east property line. Said ponds will serve the ponding requirements as we have done elsewhere in Eagle Point Business Park. TENANCY We have no tenants committed for this space at this time, but United Properties is committed to going forward on a speculative basis. The project has been designed for multi -tenant office users. DEVELOPMENT United Properties Investment LLC will develop and own the subject TEAM building. The General Contractor is United Properties — Construction, The Architect is ACl/Boland, St. Louis, Missouri. We are available to answer any questions. Thank you for your favorable consideration. Very truly yours, Dal J, Glowa Senior Vice President Development Enclosures DJG/bls C19°413'23.' R=919.07 L,-315.921, \ - , ...... v,6;', • t 0 40 i z I 9,7 '.).> --Lr- 4rh' 57: "Ft E4, c4 ‘." C ) EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 5TH ADDITION GLE- POitv'T F.fif,"51/A,AE-55 PA RA' 2.".73 ,400,77Ce",` SET SCRIBED X To IN CONCRETE -11 r .---EDOE OF ICE = poNe \ NOVEMBER. 2004 .41 • _ - ix 1-1,-.) V CENTER LINE Or \ DNR PROTECTED WATER COURSE 8 ANO B° 25"E , I UTILITY EASEMENT ..... 58 504.05 t„, 431.32 PC/NT ku cF i3U.SWESS PARK r 1. FITH ACD70N IrfAVOrRrw PLAT A10. 62-3 PAR7, roc, ti4V r7,L.., 14, v N88„ 39 03„ E 60 - „Fr r A /7/ Ot/71.0T A r7 v 48 ORA/RACE AND .._...51E3195:4256135'E nn0=F 6260,00 6 UTILITY EASEMENT 5 *1 563870°D00'00"E / OCI(I't4254 0 cc; 1"554°00'41 6=25.1S' 'W 04, 1..60.00/ //CA LA 1,111 I V! V O Denotes set, 1/2 Inch by 16 Inch Iron pipe with plastic cap inscribed RLS 16455, unless otherwise noted. ,N788.:48'24"W R=364,49 L=913.00 ."•,F E4GI..1:: POINT BU5'/'vE55 Ii=164.4D &15.0517" T7,.. VICINITY MAP ND SCALE e Denotes found, 1/2 Inch by 16 inch iron pipe with plastic cop Inscribed RLS 15480. BENCH MARK: Railroad splke In south face of 3rd set of double power poles east of Inwood Avenue North. Elevation x, 1012.65 feet (N.G.V.D. 1929) •‘!, I it% 71 4, I 200 0 2D0 400 I rntINIM L-- SCALE IN FEET or. MO. 11 94 I Inch = 200 feet SECTION 33, TOWNSHIP 29, RANGE 21 Orientation ol thls bearing system le based on the Woshington County Coordinate system, (NAD83) Sonde Land Surveying, LLC. PARA' 2NO 01.3ITION KNOW ALL BY THESE PRESENTS: That UNITED LAN() LLC, o Minnesota limited liability company, owner and proprietor of the following described property, situated In the County of Washington, Slate of Minnesota la wit: OUTLOT A, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 4TH ADDITION, according to the plot thereof flied of record in the office of the Registrar of Titles In and for Washington County, Minnesota. As evidenced by Certificate of Title No. _ Has caused the same to be surveyed and platted as EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 5TH ADDITION, and does hereby donate end dedicate to the public the easements created by thie plat for drainage ond utility purposes oniy. In wItneee whereof sold UNITED LAND LLC, o Minnesota limited liability company, hos caused these presents to be signed by Its proper officers this __ day of , 200_, UNITED LAND LLC BY: Its and __ its STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing Instrument won ocknowledged before me this ____ day of Its and ite of sold UNITED LAND LLC, a Minnesoto limited liability comPa2n°y°, -onby _ he cif of sold company. Notory Public, County,.. My Commission Explres__— I, John K. Barnes, hereby certify that I have surveyed and platted the property described on this plot as EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 5TH ADDITION; that this plot is a correct representation of the survey, that all distances are correctly shown on the plat In feet and hundredths of o foot; that all monuments hove been correctly placed In the, ground as shown; that the outside boundary lines are correctly deeIgnoted on the plat; and that there ore no wet lands as defined in MS 505.02, Subd. 1 or public highwoys to be designated other thon as ehown. John K. Barnes, Land Surveyor Minnesota License No. 10456 STATE OF MINNESOTA COUNTY OF The foregoing Surveyor's Certificate by John K. Barnes, Minnesota License No. 16455, was acknowledged before me this _ doy rit Notary Public, County, Minnesota My Commission Expires This plot of EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 5T1-I ADDITION was approved by the City Council of the City of Loke Elmo, Minnesota this ___ day of , 200_, and hereby certifies compliance with oil requirements os set forth In Minnesota Statutes, Section 505.03, Subd. 2. SIGNED: __ Mayor SIGNED: ________ City AdrnInIstrotor Pursuant to Chapter 820, Lows of Minnesota, 1971, thls plot has been approved this ___ day of __ --_, 200_, BY: Washington County Surveyor BY: Assistant County Surveyor There are no delinquent taxes, the current taxes due and payable for the year 200_ have been paid, and transfer has been entered this __— day of . 200_. BY: Washington County Auditor/Treasurer BY: deputy Document Number I hereby certify that this Instrument was flied In the Office of the Registrar of Titles for record on this __ cloy of 200_ at ---- o'clock __.M., and was duly recorded In Washington County Records. BY: e Y: WashIngro-n-7ounly Registrar of Titles Deputy rt, 2205 114sw assrwworrossorw.1634nlass, 1.41 dwiyr, ‘115.—o4riTC.4%; SLOCK 1 1 ; ‘\ \\ \'\\\\ \\\ 1 \\ \\\ \ \ I \ \ 1 1 ‘ \ ..- 'i 1 \ , \ \ \ \ \ N \ , \ \ % \ \ ; ,\ \ \ \ \ \ ----..., \ \ ' \ \ .. ----- \, - \ \ \ -,-- \ \ \ \\ \ \ ,, ,. \ \ \, -,.. '\ \ : \ \ \ \ ___ ,_ . .. _ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ ----. , l•-: \ \ i \ \ \ \ \ - --,._. 1 \ \ ...- - - - „ , . I / / • I %, \.„ I / // \A4 \\\\ \\A\ \ .PARCEI fr8 rfill-10(2111 ff. I LIV-v IV 0 432-Z :3 - mz cA)CYI $ EAGLE POINT 2 LAKE ELMO, MN SITE PLAN SPet SEVI2 241 CF. C=ti .0 PC 42 SITE MAP UNITED PROPERTIES 3500 AMERICAN BLVD. W. MINNEA.POLIS, MN 55431 REVISIONS ;:f• th f hereay certify that Vas ra or 'spot I4 diroct Licsosed lows ............... osifitatIon a uly 7 50 TOO tflJI 1f fr of IN FEET F TRO VEYINO 42 ApaloarimUse Lan. 10' ISCI143rair Tele,Mt763)346.5100 ST42-424 9,147.r.....raaradmccsa .E.Non•rcrtn.csal HOOK PAGE 11116/(15. fjo . No 2430f Res IE RASS scsism letAmIsststssoos-TESS•VIRs rAsSsrwm.1.0.....rt.R.T.V.---"' SIP.RM DRAIN NOTES ORADING NOTES a OCR" 1 03 , .er - 8 HUQ60A1 W 3611-'1110. 8,- :31 //y-i'"( \ \ T:1 V • • LEGEND 997.30 X PA R CE H OA a 3 -n z. co „, c c EAGLE POINT 2 LAKE ELMO, MN GRADING PLAN ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE PROPOSED GUTTER ELEVATION EXISTING CONTOURS PROPOSED CONTOURS SILT FENCE ILL AT 00103 SP31.2.17Ay I DATE UNITED PROPERTIES 3500 AMERICAN BLVD, W. MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55431 CHAS VASINS SNAIL NOT HE esesstio THEE FABRIC RAAB fS =ERE= SY THE CIEt TRAM coARDS SOU_ SE PLACED Att. STORM MAINS AND OBWITTs, MY= CLASS si WRAP Pm OMR FAME FUR ALL PtsE OUTTra. SEE LAST SISSES. SECTIONS Or CONCRETE 0113006843.66 1436, INCLUDING AFRON, 6040 CONCRCIE PRE LISS 'NAN 8664324 12AI227GE. Akt SELTICES SNAIL BE emo pret coNCMIE PIPE OF sasINCR DIAUVER OR 661868 INFILTRATION BASIN NOTES OWING RECOVER - ROCOSS CUBING BEAU BE OWE IN CONJUNCTION BITE THE REY( 14014001030. 052633812 MICH 11 ES Or FRESIE'D GRADE 60134 EMIT CR MEM-SIRED EMMERT. MAL GRAD= Or RASH STALL BE DOWSES vim /mascot OF SITE IS REM CPADED AND SEEDER NO OsOR-EXCAVASICTI OF SARIN AREA IS ALLOYED. AFTER REM GRAMM. TEL WE BASSI FLOOR It A TOMOS OFR. OF 6 /NORM FEC TorsolL BEN ON-STE TEEM SOILS IN A 06140 16 MISOL OR As DIRECTED sr THE 84eSSM NO EDUIPLEBTS NAY BE nEovEN AVMS 1400 BABE FUER AEBET OWING AK IMP ESTABLISH/ME OFERIATIMS ARE =REM CROWN CONTROL - ELAM SET ;Enos psalm:, SASH AREA iMAISRASS:t OYER MGR GRADING IS fiGENM. TIASITAIN MEE EtNiON GRATING AND TURF ESTADLTSTESENT BMW TS OWE AND VEGETATION ESTABUSNEO AND GROVNIC. EME ESTARTIMMET - SEED SIM OTT ',SPEWED mom. 10 ACcORDANCE ISTISI CITY RECUIREMENT3. YEGETARCE IN PIXTBS AND INFLORATION AREAS SHALL BE ROMEO WM OEM -ROOM MIRE SEGETAINST Dult/DOT MIX SIOTANT CR ERTABLI. REILAND =a EststrATVET). RE-VO.CTABON WALL CONNEKE BM. IA DAYS OF FINAL GRAMM HAAAALSASHE FEES WALL BE SEEM TETE laNDGT NCI 270 PER RE EssOF 2 DISTRICT SEEDING REMOLIEWPOWS POW:A0/7 MANE AND IMMEMS 80 EWA APOPovER NT A uNDscAll: ARCAFFOCT PRIOR ID TNE POMP.% AND INSTALLA EROSION CONTROL NOTES ALL MESON COMM heRsumS KEY 0066101400 smile 10 04TA81ENEFIEN7 01 ARAMS CREME. EE sTARTTAINED UNA. Au. DISIURBM APEAS SLR 5HE SAM VEEN RESTIYIED. entsssorr MEM CONTRIE TO OE PEA= ARM= Sam 531881 sisuctunts sumo CONSTRUstas (SEEE DETAM SEISPOIE sHALL BE PaamEm FROP AM EMINENT =IMMIX. CRAM AS NECESSARY ASO MOM DE REVOYED iF MICA CAPAISIY HAS BEEN /MUM) BY RIFTS REFICZIY. A STABILMED EMMEuzzoN ENTRANCE MALL BE RETAMED AT RE BEGINNING Of 4004411408068 ANC ronaswes FOR DURATION OF PRO.KOr. ALL SLOPES IT ON Bists,,N. NOT TO SE SODDED AND OSERIER THAN VW FEET IN BEEK SHALT HAW EROVON CONTROL FABRIC INSTALLED. CONTRAMER SMAtc REED AND Mum ALL 411SU0E65 APEAS NOT TO SE 5118006. 0060540 SHALL SE PER tAnDOT SPEC:MOM:R.1 saes Wye.. AI A RASE OP Wri Papa= PRR ACRE, 100240068 Pa,* AND strirmaasm AREAS 01403162 NIERSZE STARRY mow YET TALL) IN ACCORDANCE 91131 msoot SPOSSIGAVali 3876 APTIRD AT A RATE OF SIE PORTIA PER A{V.E. AkfLOI WALE NE Pei tinSOF SF:7E1MM= 38112. 1100 2. YNE Mu= SHALT BE APPLIED IN ACTIONDANER saw IsAtal. SPECIFIC:talon 10 DE APPLIED At A RATE OF FWO TOES ME ACM MON SHALT SE ....WORM MN 81052. CICLOBILETER OR DIRER OPPOSED EOUIPMENT, SEDIMENT 1600,0666085680000 ALL BEDIMENT CANNEL DEW= AS NECESSARY AND MIST BE BEIER= IF ERMA CAPAETY HAS BEEN Room) SY FIFTY PEISRE R/FAR101 REVISIONS -A95- ppm= =AMES EV/RESEW RIMED SURFACE tevraTt.s. SPOT 0.264110045 ALONG PROPOSED CUM ORMOS 70P RACK CF CUM COMM 063110086.1,3 CR MESE PLANS APE MED 0E1 Ritmo ORANIRM. AND, 5111E32 POSSIDLE. 5108030004401816 TAMA Is OAS PIELIC ME NORMA= AS NOT TO aE P.W.M ON AS OEM EXACT OP COMPLETE CONTRACTOR SHAM CONTACT 5710 APPROPRIATE CRUM MOORES AT 5300540 SICASTA MICR TO 9CAvAGON. 10000162166601 HMS LOCATION OF IMMIEs. 1085 CONFAMTIM 30 RESPEEME. FOR RELocATRIG 103.0001540001041115 300511 moMor Pm 4140 FRAIFIEM IMPTIONESOMIE VOSS al TAR Ru11 iNSIRIACTER i86405 tcALL ,..7.M;f.islyggtile,pu-loc--2m-115s) AS 0040 cormAcloR MEM TO MEV THE TREES DO SE SEM. vats RE FORMS OF OE TAM MARCUM =APE PEALIVAI. TO PERMIT Cs -ERASION Or THE CaNTRACEIR's Earminit ENE COMEACTOR MAU =Am 743EE sERARES OF A PRonissoot, TFoppas MOcE TO IRRA TNE TIMM MOMS IME CONTRAMERM OPMATIONS 80108.0 03154800010017 OF ANY IMES. TNE SKEEN COSS SWAIM ITE MOVED IMMESSATas AND CUTS SRAM SE PROPERLY 70016130. TO WINCES. ANY IASTLEG ISABAM NO TOM PPM. ITEMOMO IMMO MMERMATION EY NE DICIPME MEM FOR TRIMANI0 sENVIISS SNAIL EC LONSETOMD INCIOONAL To TEE GRADING 004416.327. CONTRACTOR SEM, STRIP, STOCERLE AND Its.-SPASI SUFFEJENT IDASOIL TO PROtIDE A WENN FOUR 0406 mod To ALL EMMEM ASHAS HO SE ROMEO DR METRE 166MOM DIMMING =sone O_SmATION P./OT VARY EY 140PE MAN slo Eam ABOVE OR WOW ME PROPMED tetvrmos. 2031. OR PAVING REA SURCRADE EIEVADON ...I., NOT VARY gy mane mot aoS EMT AIME OR MA(OR THE possmoM ELSORME APEAS 50 MERE ,AOSTAL SHAM at OTALS) TO saess, A7r. oF EM 000068 EMMEN 004105554000105401430905050111138381100450 TEEM MAU. sE ERASED 10 MON # 84454 op THE spEcoM MOO= 1145 CONTRA:Tolt MEM =Orr 07144 TFIE REDDIRMENTS 4141 IRE SINISESOTA YOULDRON 008,804. ACE4E0 - RATIONAL POLLUIANT =RAM EUMNAMM owe./ MEM Mom. coNERAems gE A 003 CO-APIRJEATIT ETA THE OMER TNE CONTRACTOR 50018, COMPLESE ThE REWEED IMPEOTEM PEPOPES AND Se RIMMONSME 1850 SIAINIMANCE 011 54 eas EMMET COMPEL DEEMS, ROUSIANCEFA 1. INE MIMING susomot FORM) SARFAcE Mammas MALL NoT PAM BY MEM THAN am FT. MEE, oR 0.30 01, mom ME FREWISIM ELMATEN AT Alry MOM STEM MASUPAUSIT LS FRAM 7. TREE STREET CR PAR= AMA 50000,01340 RESITED SuRFAM 0.218759 STIAI,L NOT VAST BY 1.4CM THAN 0.95 FT. ABOsEs OR OSTI 61, REAM ME PREMEMS EUVATIMA CR RE PONT TAM,* 043883081324014001 6800. H AREAS TOM APE TO REMO TOPS.. SHALL BE ERASER TO SIMS DM FT. MOSE MI, &WET TRE REALTRM ELEVATION. MEM IHRECTO OMERMA 401 1184014003001, 4. TOPSOIL mom RE coMes IV PLUS OR TAMS 13 INCH OF 74 SPEEPIED IMMINESS. NATEEEN= I. TEE coNTRAErop RPM PR0IEGT TERM SPADED AREAS FROM IPME AND MOEN. AND SEEP AREA 0060 OF IVER AND Data 2- coNTMETOR 0488144031640803014225106110346868114 miTwc MOOED AND NoTTED AREAS it ws-,^res Tetemaco DURING FRE CORSTRUCDOK, nom. ow systc 'NE syrAnairr PERM. ERODEI AF.EAS WEE TEE CS 70 BE EREABLESER, /Roo EE AND 1011866. 3. MOE =FAMED COMPACTED AREAS ARE CRIERSM. 86 SUREEWENT COSETReCTION MEADOW CR IBISEASE NEA1is7. CONTRACTOR SHAM SCARIFY, 504110117. ASSNAPE AND Losoor YO REWIRED DENSER REM SD norTNEN caNsTRUctioN. AFTER SITE cRAMNG SS COMPLETED, E MESS ON STIORTAM Or SC4. MATERIAL emit tie CONTRACTOR SHALL TRANSPORT ALA, ETCESS WCE.T1s. AS OFT lir SEE TO AN AREA saRGESD SY WE EGNTRACTOP- OR WORT moms tiATMAL TO OE ME A 6000 EMI EIJIHNET 844913.50 EFFIROCIT EEL 61,81011 IN AREAS SOH ha EAJ:SE' MIMS 31, IRE C01108C61R. 58001. OcAMMITS DEMTETAR, As REWIRED To COMFBEIS THE SEE GRADING CONSTRUCTSRE THE ccaNIRACEST WALL CORKY SEM THE 0100001510415 OF RE 1044:63808 PcLuntart mow. MENLO - woo. poccoTANT DIEWAREE CLINsuota. 618,140 (4OTOM ?MBE TEO ODITTRACTER tsm. BE SECURED To SE 13 co-Assucute yam OMR. 1115 5014685106 WALL COMP. -TIE 1585 REOMPSEEt 08650594 750OR00 100 C0N1RACR1R al. RE RESPONSIR.E FCR 1A1,3 .11MIANCE CF 14511.0113100 CONTROL 4118009 A CC, OF THE PFPNIT DAN HE OSUMI} MOW 1450 IENERETP- Act MAMA MOTS AND PAMEFFT PAEcRo 70 at SATTCUT AT Pitt COM& Mstslant CONTROL litEsksuRES muST SE INSMATIME PRIDR TO CONNELICZNENT 01 ORAFRNG ERMATENS AND RE MENTAEFE7 Omit 001, ITISTLIASE) AREAS EN T/IS SEE. NEE PM/ 410310001, 15 TINIFORMY AROSE. Forma, MAT FARM OR APEOM EIRIVALENT) TO 05 man ;moo stow DRAIN ST-Sots:LEES ISLIFONE CONEDRICTION (REM SO DETAIL). 14. sesuse.T SR._ SE REPOOM FROM AU. SEOME mITMOL WARMS AS NRIMSARY AND 4405500010484051 IF 68353 6670550 RAS BEST 65000814 010015 X A STABESEED CONSTRUCTION ENTRAASE RIAU, BE RESALES AT IRE SEVIN= COLISIrsictots 01 Wtil'Ailla, RIR DURATION 0F 18. ... SLOPES .3-1 CR STM,E.R. NCI YE so)DED ANO GREA:Es *rum a E27 MART. 97862 RAPE ERDECTI CONTRO.. FARB= INSTALTED. " IN \, METRO LAND SURVEYMIG a.EMETRZERME P.06,1•011301,304 "0FacpS3)395.2466 , 134oL63 011536 05011 FACE - if XI Ikt ..111111011110 .1...MAW a* .r *on * /Th nri HUDSON 9LVD. 14,11FAirigtaX1=11,464---'KNOlf,a, SITE PLAN h, j NORTH EAGLE POINT OFFICE CENTER - PHASE TWO 11 A 205064,00 November 143,200E jgo ACI BOLAND AnIIITECTS LANNEll 0 INTERIOR DEEM E 88 11477 0116 calm RO 11771 Thli Nigla 140 45014 Dodd/ &ems Iltti L081.140 NMI Lgogrood. KS eon rhotroogng, 8408*DIP 314,001003 013,710 zlno CCM 91111D 714,06168181 leg 81177702701108 0111.813 97d7 UNITED PROPERTIES EAGLE PINT BUSINESS PARK LAKE LMO, MINNESCYTA ITIETTSSITERISSIST SoSSTAS - USOL SUNSCSA VMS S-Jf'SkrTril. 4Fartm STONEVERSZS .SATIMIT WIGS SIOSTSVHSET,--/ ACCESSISI. VONESS - HT.VLAW' , . 'TWOS SO METAL IVINSTS STSIS • PRESSISINTOSISISc,- TSEISISSFIRS kw. anr4o— • .,"." • .*SSarNsliEs MAT IITSJITTIVISISASTIS SITEFAMPONSTIfit INSTTSW SYSTEM 25 WEST EXTERIOR ELEVATION SASSISISNTSSSTAT t'SSTIN OSSZCS If PSESSAIIISIMSTAL SOWN IITSTIS 24 NORTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION es• ZLM-Th'dE. CMS. ES " • ••• . , in.ErKwit mi-mt,conwo SOSITHISITSI OVSM 22 STONEVENSES-2 ASCSNTSPICXViTTSEN UNITED PROPERTIES EAST EXTERIOR ELEVATION iyiirK6 ram nano- 21 SOUTH EXTERIOR ELEVATION StSSUSATESSILASHO TVESTOSKTISIFTAL ESISTAINVOSIASSTIN ftnialtvEsm SiSVIATTSI SWIMS+ HISSISSIMOSSTAL STOWIEFRoSTITTSTS0 INSOITORIT ISTTESIO SPISFIISISED SEWS VISICIVf MITTS SILXISSENE TSSTISSINTS SSW. ISSTOSI VISSULASSIS 01 M&014 rxrna.sonyfftri. vonwoor.rr SYSTEI, MAL AMMO! ANIAM —i-tommro WARM IR PRESSITSTESSESTS STSTICSIISTT "MEM 003341131140140-111 0.101. fZxtzarmim Ifi4311. 'ATM PAW 3,000 Ti4-141 INSMATRO SITANNTITS PREScissitTS WAS V441POW 9001'001 ISTSSESSOSSTSII ASCENT 0111010HD STSHE T4VOGONSIVII . , . . ISSITSINIMINVISL ormArosnAma PlIFFINIstIDD 00114.- C1444041110110,01001 41117440461,15174. 004110 ..,—,eae,t,xotonien weer 01110441111, COMM 04 1111144410/03100/34/ moo/rem-gm ar;140:14i4g1if rrin Viar V MAIM/ WORM PREF408031/ MAL 51011.44004411401011 g-sit - Kla %WA -11 EAGLE POINT OFFICE CENTER - PHASE TWO SATV4IFSMOMSTAL pcfltb 1110114 VE00,01 PSESINISMOSSTSCOSS ,14000 111/0000300 01101116 ISITSPIISNRIS PANEL STSSISIS ISONTSMESS -7 51 V.:7 46i 4'4 '4,1a% 014.0. T111.013401000ENT-' 0100114014 STONE 014:0143:TUFT0L , 14%,011030100 EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK LAKE IELMQ, MINN ESOTA &TONE ' - •L'A'4 410' - 205064.00 November 10, 2006, ACI BOLAND DrICHITEC16 PLANNED& INTERIOR DE6166069 17471 OW Gain Fd. 1122A Neu. Belle tie 43011Domor Oreavoa no. 01, 14,112, ro 0 03141 Lermonei. De Mall GrerelveN1, MD 04e2e 314,901 11003 Vilna 24111) 1116,7113 304.2 314.081 !Mrs 10 0133.10.:013 lw Ifinlim IOW gm, 4" l'-9" 1 3'-6"+/- 9"+/- 1 TOP VIEW T.B.D. 7_611 6'-0" 51_61I PRIMARY TENANT IDENTIFICATION INTERNALLY ILLUMINATED SIGN - C.5 E.2 D.3/D.4 F.2 BEVELED AREA OF BASE AT 45 DEGREE ANGLE A LANDSCAPING BY OTHERS C,5 .125 ALUMINUM SKIN OVER I" X 1" AL FRAME, AS SUcrURALLY REQUIRED. P 'MAP' MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POL DARK GREEN (#61A-1A Nocturnal Sea) ILLUMINATION: F72 T12CW HO FLUORESCENT LAMPS FOR EQUAL BRIGHTNESS, 'GE' 800 MA BALLASTS, OR EQUAL. D.3 ROUTED LETTERS OUT OF ALUMINUM SIGN FACE BACK- ED W/ TRANSLUSCENT WHETE PLEXIGLAS D,4 ROUTED PANEL (2'6" high X 5'6" wide) BACKED IN TRANSLUSCENT WHITE PLEXIGLAS (REMOVEABLE) WITH COPYWIASICED OPF AND PANEL PAINTED TO MATCH MAP' DARK GREEN (#61A-1A Nocturnal Sea) E.2 .125 ALUMINUM SKIN OVER 1" X 1" ALUMINUM ANGLE FRAME, AS STRUCTURALLY REQUIRED, pRimE & FINISH 'MAP' MATTHEWS ACRYLIC POLYURETHANE DARK GREEN (#61A-IA Nocturnal Sea) F,2 CONCRETE BASE WITH VERTICAL, ANGLED DETAIL SCORE (as shown) PAINTED WITH TEXTURED PAINT TO COMPLEMENT D.3 THE STUCCO FINISH ON THE LANDSCAPING WALL AT THE CAMPUS ENTRANCE (Sonowall Stucco Systems Riverbend #116-T) G UNDERGROUND ELECTRICAL CONDUIT SWEEP (NO EXPOSED CONDUIT). OWNER TO PROVIDE ADEQUATE C.5 ELECTRICAL POWER TO WITHIN 15' OP SIGN PRIOR TO CONCRETE INSTALLATION, INSTALLING SIGN COMPANY TO ALERT OWNER OR OWNERS CONSULTANT OF CON- CRETE 7 DAYS IN ADVANCE, SIGN COMPANY TO STUB OUT ELECTRIC -AL CONDUIT SWEEP AT FOUNDATION INSTALLATION TIME FOR ELECTRICAL CONNECTION. 120 VOLT OR 277 VOLT SERVICE TO BE DETERMINED, SIGN COMPANY TO COORDINATE ELECTRICAL RE- QUIREMENTS W/ OWNER. SIGN FABRICATOR TO SPECIFY AMPS REQUIRED ON SHOP DRAWINGS -F.2 A G • H • I H STEEL POLE FINISH PRIMED & PAINTED EXTERIOR WHITE CONCRETE BASE ADEQUATE TO WITHSTAND 30LB. WIND LOAD. ALL FOOTINGS & POLE DIMENSIONS ARE SUB- JECT TO FIELD SURVEY & SOIL:CONTENT RESULTS IV BE PROVIDED BY THE INSTALLING SIGN COMPANY. ALL FINAL POLE & FOOTING SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE RE- SPONSIBELITY OF 11-M INSTALLING SIGN COMPANY AREA OF COPY NOT TO EXCEED 30 SQ, FT. OF SIGN AREA EXCLUDING THE ADDRESS NUMBER ALL COPY TO BE DETERMINED United Properties 3500 West soth Street • Minneapolis, MN Eagle Point Business Park Lake Elmo, MN jI.IkIflII IA -1 II 11111,1,1111E1.111j I . Exterior Sign Design 1,106lii,4111,114111.1,11pal.,..LI11.,.14.1L:114141116At1ail VISUAL Communications 475 C leve lan d AvenueNorth Suite 2 2 3 Ivy League Place Saint Paul Minnesota 5 5 1 0 4 651-644-4494 Fax 644-4289 ,1411.1 lg.' ic..1.414;11...,a311.110.11,i11.1. Project: 81007 Date: 9 / 9 / 99 Rev: 2/14/02 UP/EP/SPBC 6 (rev) 1, , E Page: 6.1 .11Am,.11111 1 .,1E PRIOR TTo TG 4. I+II 4IO SL Y764T LY.GOTIE 44t41.E101Y rA 14LIAR RIM ERE G010NTIQNe. - ALL 341 Sti MEWL% eitEATTiNt$TDSE Poe Of 8T12R0. NO KNOW. R41. EE ei8TA14.Ec INT L DLTIi GDMPLETP.D III 005FDNTE AREA gTIER • OONTRACTOTTRE T. TO 0RNTFrc ALL 1rei F.Rb0ALN8 G4BI.E9, GOtUA411A HMO, LAG. oil THE P34TTRTY F 148R0 I0 A 0NEGREPN#T RETTEMIT TM WRITER 441 PLASi1 010r61 ON THE PLAY Arlo Tta 'WEER 01' P4Ari10 TII4W71 1NTN0 41..N4T LIST, Via ?weer,. or tL t%IIIMITo0I 'Ott MAN MU. TAKE A.4 cON1Ali6R MAME& TO he b.ROl1i IN GGMTA iVR AMIt1NLM Cp - ALL MAMMAL 0MAW- GOIEO,T t4Tii TIE LA1ERY EWRON 0°'MAI/MMAH PSI PNPA+B ram R 4F I11t A00RT,EN. - REPAIR ALL pA^A'00 TOAROPERTT mom PLA TINA of3NATIGYY0 AT ND 40ET TO Mt C443SR 6UATWIIEE rvy IPLANT MATERIAL 1MRITRSd4ONE.°ALT:T=4a TEAR.P4R F*GILV404 TREED t)11 TO 1.1/2"CA1.. . 6t)14121M IPT011' RT At/Vie0. MVO M. 60 MARARRRL TOR ITT! GNE*TAR YEAR. rl tl TIME 0$ PRDYIaORu AGta'I'NIGE - AU- TROP.RED PIAN10 V1µL EC WARIER GAREPUI.T A0 M491m T*4 TM1 1,14404 ANP 0NA13 EC AAAR0V0o 0Y A N11,04Ar'8 0000111•GTOEPORE MeY AREIIOTAUW, - GON1RA4TOR .NI al01ri1L40 LIAGIMW 070411fllPAAD EAR St0Tt1 APPROTRIA� LA0DO4MC ARGNI1C470 APAROVAI., - I.N0Oi4M8 O0N3P.AOTGR MAU,. 0610446 THAT A8M TR010 IA4VO0 UNTO rraan4t0 LAR.1 $CTE ARE CTI.T. aTAT W*00ES This MAfhEGT OEAVr TO l*AVT, L,t4t1T T.1.4HT ++4441T TO LIBNT PAPA, -1.RTP0GAAE 41341'RAGTOR 1 M0481400 14 MAIM. H1M MAtl4El1Ai.Ge It40M1ATION OLRRYTEO e4MI6RNIEC T2PJO0 RE4ATH0 TO T0A1GRM4.1. MOINA, PRVRIIO. PC`T G04T7O1., NO RELATED ITEM TKO 1U1-1- 01 pREPARE1 AND OO1IYE3E0 ib 0Tr3R A0IIR PR0V16t0NN..RPEG1IGH ATMROTAI, MAO OWN 63401 0T 1ANT4,1AP4 AR4RRCG11$. - ME ATTO& MATERIAL MMLI. ER GOIi0UAAY6p TREE PRentan01t F11T1111E ORE OP 14SR 1' ot1 RIK) )-MOM 1T4Nt TN0 4A0AER i1TGN ME OT TREE TO 00 PRp13GTE4.VRAP,1,U TRSEE4 EAOORT IDCKECARY TREE VOLT EG PRUTEGIEO ME MTD WA Atm nets Re1KWE10 Or $A flCLY 05340R1..000TId1'00 OTIEPPIIEZ, GR101.L BE MACK: VIM3I E01000, W ARR. GCT-OLA 1SN.44 It4C. LY.AfX„ KNOTT STYLE EDEER UR PUTG.11 GOY.RA EMT ED6ER. - ROCK MEGA tM41. PO 0" OVER 1'4 OW VIA ?WNW SLYER PFOK MR PDEO G18KGLWi4 - V DERP Mot? 016C11 Hit SE 1IEMTN-tr.. .MR ALL TREES AR. 440JE6 THAT ARC 4E1AT00 r41GNi 6Rna11x4V4R ANt1b AMo 6RN0RPL Este M14R$0, LA*PFKAETE FA0R14 (01410R MATT TO NAVE A0p16AM0p JIEIMB al` 4E-100 OL PEA BTAPO,iipD G MOULD EPA YEAR MRONOM TCA117RADN.0TY PO4TOR IN AE1 OuttLIORT.MAINTIO TO OE rTnLUPe MOO A. 4R C4wVA4014T,LENT. MOVIE REVARGD PGR APPRGYAy - ALL P1ANR10 MALL REGEM !TRIILIEGR AO RO4L0PT4 0V1640R ATT. PALL PLNO'IR6 - baron TIMER TRERIE-4.4 A4PL0 O.24-20 eTR vi-R0Itt O444 00 APAMPLAN. AT PLAAT TIB RATE OA 141 OZ GAR AIR,T-0' GN. 1RE1 i 14 EYE.4Ai MI.004' PIER PINS. 10.40.1Y4 LP MTN TEE OAME AMG88 OP 10.0}1. 1NE TOLLOnH4 E ARR. - 40O OHN-L CE R50i01110 Opp, 140 R41.1.0 Mittlirlowg. TOOKE APPLIOA6LE, TO Et LAP PARA.L0L TO 11E 445NT0Fh Af RAVE OTAAAE1E0 .:GENE ON 11I.4310 VETTER THAN 0,I GS DRAR1Ab0OYNtf9. The 000 0i014- RC sin= WO 'nit *palm sankwy min tmemto 'RADIO Tami Pao GOL71VATOR TO A MIN DIM tr IR' ARTA1D51 13410 DP 10100. 44440 11R01 ORA1.ID TOR WV I1TEP1AT33Y 310:33 t TO T0AGIN8 54 , GGMMC?OR &TALL MAW 14.0-4 F0RIE.IZE R AT Vie RATE Of to PoNTE4 Etta Imo e4, PT. • GALIPOR OP ALL TREE MONKS IP TO AWO d1GLd0IR3 A`MWL4. DE 14EA1010.0 8- ABOVt 0001R, LOTITL, ANo 40' AO.% MATO LEv40. TOR LAMER Ora& PECIMOVIT01144000RA5+ MAW MCOEM oP P4VR IN awes AT 41PE4In00 PEWIT Rime. OTIHRY10R N417.0 N4 PLANT L14T - AM. Pi.AIM.. ARPA1 RR1EIV0P, VIN00a4A1 IIITA AINN. EET111i DI' MARTINS SOIL 14511. TOMOIL, 4.04 ETAT OIE iE41I1M 1.04 EAYpA - 1P TA GCl/IRAGIGR, P00401Yi 0RR0R RNO OM HATAT RE4ATm4NO ONAGINE OR iWRW14003 OE A EMCEE Cr KART Tr eL TOE PI -AN TTTTN4GMRCGt RIME TO TH0 IOTA LATION CT KNIT MATERAA. *ALL. • et 14-01000 E#14.1Y 1044444.1.00 �P.RA MEAT, G0NTRAT.TOR SHAM TWOS. 1ROTAL IHR AIRY Pt,A4T MATERIAL n ORAITIASE tMAI ARIA& M PWPLY lad SUMO 144H'G-P$0TT0 3500TOO/ 754110A 000. 0RON4GAST, pRIM. ATM* HY0IL0BRRp AT A RATE OP 44 1.00-PER WO. M4. OR 11Ev00O LII . PCR AL{RG IT Odk 9R:57WGSPINA Ti044I000IIC iTOA E 011100 4,1,0 Mow AEtlG44 I{1CM ERa4OG4EY0N60P 60430 44010 0A0)14FOTG18r0R00 THIT4VE 480R 0101ORTNSO HARD P00GeE Mb WIC* WW2 Intatv GORTAGT D0 a env 041.$TIOIK T7ITN mENTGN0 AT beadmeet 0e0 PLANT LIST 15y . :Cornmon $ B0Eanll S J14NIeytliI,Vmp.il.l _ 330404 i&E tri0ENdor WWEMT Yi1_1F2ty_ TY tTRT.pI., 4GGItti. f(ere.y 7Au0rPTi6lettio Coh,Tiirtwo' Is ew�nc wad's. t7RuuTR teen) Inpt. Blom{:___•.,... 1E0E1118100 016011 p a Oro' 1Bol 1OME' Toad'' 1 th110 iR .IEllno{e, Mrtlpli[IeadliT IN0 GrEtNdislrbslowa6" ht. MIn.1alt"a6L laden "I�'G>»ndr':sTlejeiv a6°fiE It'NIIPotm to rR64O.12' in1 RIB dnoIer Id?? FIT. ®L OONIIEEROUB 8NRUR COO TN4RRI6A11Gtl 000746 111E0140 14R1/4411031 ®ECIDuov8 TREE IEYD. 811i 00 ME DECIDUOUS TREE ▪ 6tMPMNi BITE 10 OM ERNST ABBOCIATER wrx 11.IeL1 nmeT 1 NOW ■ el 1/20/05 NOW MOM PIM CRC 0BR tx EAGLE POINT 2 IGB1mq LAKE ELOO, MINNESOTA NOTMIL LANDSCAPE PLAN L1.0 ake Elmo City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning Agenda Item: 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program (CIP) Background Information for December 6. 2005: No. 9B At its meeting November 28, 2005 the Planning Commission conducted the required Public Hearing and unanimously adopted a recommendation for approval of the 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program as presented by City staff. The Park Commission had completed its review and recommendations regarding the CIP at its November 21 meeting, and those recommendations were incorporated in the draft CIP Presented to the Planning Commission (and attached here). There was no Public testimony offered regarding the CIP during the Public Hearing. Action items: Motion to adopt Resolution #2005-137 , approving the 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program Attachments: 151 1. Draft Resolution #2005 — Approving the 2006-2010 CIP 2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of November 28 3, Staff Memo to the Planning Commission 4. 2006-2010 CIP Booklet Person resnonsible: Ci Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION 2005-137 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE 2006-2010 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM WHEREAS, at its November 21, 2005 meeting, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on the draft 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommends adoption of the 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program. WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the draft 2006-2010 Capital Improvements Program recommended by the Planning Commission. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lake Elmo City Council approves the 2006-2010 Capital Improvement Program as the planning guide to capital expenditures. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator DRAFT PUBLIC HEARING: Capital Improvement Program 2006-2010 The Planner explained that this Public Hearing is an annual update required by State Statute. The CIP is a team effort of department heads. The Planning Commission will review the Parks portion of the CIP. State Statute requires the Planning Commission involvement as a planning function and less as a financial consideration, The Finance Director explained the changes to the CIP such as requesting a Code Enforcement Officer and a printer plotter. Civil Defense Sirens are requested based upon the Fire Study completed this year with a recommendation for six new sirens. Vehicles and fire equipment were reviewed. The Finance Director said the amount of money doubled under Heavy Rescue because the city has not kept up with the depreciating equipment. Negative balances in that area of the CIP will have to be addressed. There could be a lease program or capital equipment bonding over a ten year period. The Administrator said Heavy Rescue is a new vehicle in place of a fire truck going out for a call. When everything is reorganized the city will be down a couple of emergency vehicles. All the necessary equipment for first response is available in this new vehicle. The Chief generally is first on the scene, and second on the scene would be this equipped Command Vehicle that would be a step down from Heavy Rescue. Commissioner Armstrong asked if the new Fire Station is in the CIP. The Finance Director said it will not be in the CIP until a strategy has been determined and because we had been awaiting Fire Study results. The Administrator said the Fire Study recommended two different locations for the fire stations. The city has to determine whether to move the existing two stations, add new stations, or some other option. Commissioner Deziel asked if the fire plan coordinates with neighboring city stations and fire support, and whether these vehicles coordinate with the Fire Study. The Administrator said they do coordinate with the Fire Study. The Fire Study recommended a station at 10th Street and near Tapestry. Commissioner Fliflet asked if some of this cost is based upon relocation of the fire stations. The Administrator said no because the city is looking at it as two replacement stations. He said the city proposed a Joint Powers Agreement with the County Regional Park for siting one of the stations on county land near the Regional Park, and it is under discussion. Public Works will purchase a new Backhoe as a trade for the small motor purchased this year. The city requests a dump truck at 2010 and a generator at 2007 for the new public works/water tower backup. Revenue from collocation helps offset radio fees. A 1 ton heavy duty pickup truck will be needed in 2008. The Finance Director said the Parks Commission recommended improvements to parks in Carriage Station for $40,000 next year and Heights Park $50,000 over two years for a play field and play structure. Chairman Helwig said he had some calls from residents on 27th Street asking why a play structure is being considered for Heights for only three families with kids. The Administrator explained that the city received a lawful petition from residents requesting upgrades to Heights Park. A letter summarizing the petition was submitted for the commission's review. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 28, 2005 DRAFT Commissioner Fliflet asked how City Hall is financed. The Administrator said the capital was raised for the Public Works and City Hall, and it is in reserve. The Finance Director said it is an operational expense for repayment of that bond. Staff recommends replacement of computer networks and equipment in two years. The server is five years old. We don't have luxury of waiting for a new city hall to be built. He said staff has been careful of what we buy because we do not want to support the old facility without consideration for the new facility. Within two years we hope to have built a new city hall. The Finance Director said Infrastructure Reserves are exclusively for street maintenance and repairs. Commissioner Deziel asked if we are putting sewer into the streets in the Old Village, how is that coordinated with street maintenance. The Finance Director said that Sewer and water are accounted for in another section of the CIP. Now there is a more elaborate Water CIP compared to previous years. The Planner said we don't know the exact schedule for sewer yet so there is nothing in reconstruction yet due to sewer. He said Laverne needs to be replaced but we wanted to wait until the sewer arrives. Sewer will arrive but it is the plan not to force existing Old Village residents to hook up to it. The Administrator said the CIP is the best vision for the next five years. We will have a better idea of how that will be timed when the Old Village Plan comes in and other plans are achieved. Commissioner Roth asked how long a street lasts. 10 years said the Planner. They will last longer in the future because we were building to a 5 ton standard and a few years back we began building to a 9 ton standard. Seal coats last longer, mills and overlays last longer. The Planner said annual inspections are performed by the Public Works Superintendent and the City Engineer has a schedule for repairs, coats, and replacements. Commissioner Armstrong asked about the state contribution for MSA. The Planner said the city designates streets for the State Aid System. For every mile of new street we construct, that number for State Aid goes up. State Aid revenues can help offset bonding for streets. The Chairman opened the Public Hearing at 8:48 p.m., and nobody was in the audience. He closed the Public Hearing at 8:49 p.m. M/S/P, PtaceklDeziel, to recommend approval of the CIP 2006-10. VOTE: 9:0. City Council Update The Planner said that senior city staff had a clarification meeting with appointed staff at Met Council. The technical items required for our Comprehensive Plan will be submitted next week. Two items were not simple. The Old Village Plan is not in the Comp Plan and the conditions in the Resolution that extended our deadline for submission are another issue. We may need another Public Hearing for the Comprehensive Plan. 3M Company Donation Chairman Helwig said the 3M Company donation of land to Oakdale for a sports facility leaves him concerned about new home numbers for the Comprehensive Plan and the affect on the ball park plan for the Old Village Area. The Administrator said that staff found out about the proposed donation when it hit the newspapers. He said there was some indication a few months ago that Oakdale was interested in this type of park. The parcel is below the railroad tracks. This request was made by Oakdale two years ago for another site. 3M's plan is to deed the Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of November 28, 2005 4 DRAFT CIP 2006-2010 Superintendent Bouthilet met with Commissioner Schumacher today. His recommendations were presented for. each park. Jennifer McCormick representing Carriage Station reiterated there are 300 children in Carriage Station, and park usage would also come from Fields and Tana Ridge without crossing Highway 5. It is also a highly visible park and needs improvements. They were hoping for an athletic component and sitting area with shade as well as the additional play structure. Tom McCormick said he was president of neighborhood association when the development first was started. He was involved in the original park plan for Carriage Station. TKDA did an elaborate park plan valued at $175,000. Homeowners had an expectation of that type of park. Commissioners Schumacher and Bouthilet recommended $20,000 for a playset in Carriage Station. $17,000 was spent there last year. Commissioners Bruchu and Watters recommended some more trees. Soccer and basketball were also recommended. Commissioner Steele recommended fencing around the pond and more trees. He said if we are investing heavily in the park, there should be parking. Administrator Rafferty said people in the neighborhoodvill walk to a neighborhood park. Superintendent Bouthilet said it is legal to park on the street there. Superintendent Bouthilet said Commissioner Schumacher recommended $25,000 for Heights Park improvements and $25,000 in 2007 for play structure. Superintendent Bouthilet asked to swap years for Lions and Pebble Parks and to move Reid improvements to 2007. Tana Ridge and Fields residents have asked for more improvements. There are 134 homes between Fields I and II, Bluestein, and Tana Ridge. The commissioners discussed landscaping and amenities, basically the same as Carriage Station. VFW Park backstop would cost about $4,000 and $3,000 for nets. The Superintendent Bouthilet said the curbed area would not function well without extensive work so he and the City Engineer recommended that egg berming might work better. That column of cost should be $10,000. Commissioner Ames recommended the following Trails Improvements sooner than some others. Carriage to Sanctuary, 50'h to 53rd Street, Fields to Old Village, extending 50 further west, loop along Lake Elmo Avenue. There are three neighborhoods south of 36 developing right now, and connecting the Old Village to the Regional Park. Jennifer McCormick requested more money for a play structure at Carriage because the same money is budgeted for Heights Park even though that neighborhood is one quarter the size of Carriage Station. The Commissioners discussed the fact that $17,000 was already spent this year. They suggested spending the $40,000 there next year and get it done immediately. Pavilion should be moved*to 2009. Heights Park should be $25,000 the next two years for a ball field and for a play structure. A dog park in 2010 for Lake Jane Hills Park budget $5,000. Sanctuary Master Plan and Sunfish Master Preservation Plan both $5,000 for next year. Tana should have some more landscaping and benches next year. VFW ball field improvements in 2006 will be $10,000. Trails Plan $150,000. Insert a row for updating the Comprehensive Park Plan and budget $5,000. The Finance Director said the 2006 balance will be $126,619 after these expenses. The Finance Director said the CIP is a Planning function rather than an accounting function. He recommended using the CIP as a wish list, then dealing with the financing as you want to complete the projects. Lake Elmo Parks Commission Meeting Minutes of November 21, 2005 2 DRAFT M/S/P, T. Bouthilet/Ames, to recommend the Capital improvement Program for 2006-2010 as presented. VOTE: 8:0. (Attached) 0 vddle tbr2LitYti' M/S/P, Ames e t the 2006 Meeting Schedule as proposed. VOTE: 8:0. (Attached) 410441iiiiiksil, 6 1.1V 441. Respectfully submitted, Kimberly Schaffel Recording Secretary Lake Elmo Parks Commission Meeting Minutes of November 21, 2005 Table of Contents I. Capital Acquisition Page Capital Acquisition Summary Report 1 Capital Acquisition -Administration 2 Capital Acquisition - Civil 3 Capital Acquisition - Building Dept.......... ..... 4 Capital Acquisition - Fire Dept (Equipment)5 Capital Acquisition - Public Works Equipment6 Capital Acquisition - Parks (Equipment) 7 Capital Acquisition - Parks (Improvements) 8 In. Infrastructure Reserve Infrastructure Reserve - Non MSA...., 9 IV. MSA Construction Capital Acquisition - Public Access 10 V. Enterprise Funds Water Enterprise Fund - Capital Projects....... ............ 1 1 Sewer Enterprise Fund - Capital Projects... ..... . ..... ....... 12 Storm Water Fund - Capital Projects ...... ........ ........... . 13 1 2006 Department Additions Expense Administration 20,000 39,500 Civil Defense 9,000 20,000 'Building Dept 7,000 18,000 Fire -Equipment 0 399,000 Public Works - Equip. 60,000 12,700 Parks - Equipment 20,000 28,000 Total 116,000 517,200 Parks -Acquisitions (404) 70,000 1 287,000 Infrastructure Reserve 1 243,764 MSA Street Construction I 200,000 Water Enterprise Capital Sewer Enterprise Capital 1 4,051,500 7,056,159 379,109 Surface Water Enterprise I 78,000 65,000 276,613 Cabital Aqusisition Summary Report II I I.1 I I I I 1 I w"*"CAPITAL EQUIPMENT (410) 2007 1 2008 2009 Balance Additions1 Expense Balance Additions1 Expense Balance „Additions Expense Balanc 49,749 22,000 53,000 18,749 24,000 13,000 29,749 26,000 3,000 52,749 i I 58,547 I 9,000 20,000 47,547 9,000 20,000 1 5,735 9,000 0 14,735 9,000 21,000 -406,159 40,000 650,000 -1,016,159 40,000 0 356,311 70,000 25,000 401,311 70,000 70,000 0 41,453 35,000 40,000 11,453 30,000 75, 6 126,619 9,01 0,000 748,000 -492,364 187,000 Parks Acquisition Summary Report (404) 70,000 1 125,000 71,619 70,000 Infrastructure Reserve (409) 208,750 I 475,578 -256,957 MSA Street Construction (402) 232,529 478,849 32,277 200,000 I 110,819 121,457 n 200,000 1 I I Water Enterprise Capital Fund (601) 1,680,205 II 551,500 I 541,384 I 1,690,321 II 432,000 I I 1 1 Sewer Enterprise Capital Fund (602) 43,889 459,756 379,109 I 1,523,196 I -684,331 171 180,000 1 I I Surface Water Enterprise Capital Fund (603) 39,372 81,000 1 230,000 1 -109,628 11 82,500 164,000 51,000 36,547 , 9,000 20,000 25,547 2,735 10,000 0 12,735 -976,159 40,000 0 -936,159 401,311 75,000 13,000 I 463,311 36,453 35,000 0 71,453 -469,364 fl 195,000 36,000 1.1 90,619 1 70,000 81,000 2010 Additions Expense 28,000 14,453 10,000 40,000 0 20,000 24,000 0 75,000 150,000 40,000 -310,364 I 207,453 79,619 70,000 299,3131 -323,741 247,495 162,225] -238,472 pi 255,606 I I 61,252 0 Balance 80,749 20,000 -1,265 -896,159 388,311 111,453 194,000 -296,911 56,000 93,619 100,000 -82,866 260,205 H 200,000 I 693,533 -233,328 j 200,000 1,499,725 I I 408,000 1,714,321 fl 432,000 1354,764 1,791,557 I I 225,410 -729,741 N 180,000 24,539 -574,279 11 50,000 -77,128 11 84,300 1 0 1 7,172 1,1 432,000 1 3,995,764 180,000 23,641 86,100 50,000 1 -1,533,053 -1,772,208 -417,920 43,272 -1- CITY OF LAKE ELMO CAPITAL ACQUISITION CAPITAL ACQUISITION -ADMINISTRATION Administration 410 ITEM Amount REPLACE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS 69,249 49,749 18,749 29,749 52,749 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 Total Additions 20,000 22,000 24,000 26,000 28,000 Code Enf. Vehicle 11,000 2006 Fax 500 2006 Laser Printer 5,000 2006 Computers 3,000 2006 Electronic Records Equip. 15,000 2006 Computers/Network 5,000 2006 Copy Machine 40,000 2007 Computers/Network 10,000 2007 Computers/Network 10,000 2008 11,000 500 5,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3,000 15,000 5,000 40,000 10,000 10,000 Total Expenses 39,500 53,000 13,000 3,000 0 FUND BALANCE 49,749 18,749 29,749 52,749 80,749 -2- CITY OF LAKE ELMO CAPITAL ACQUISITION-C1VIL DEFENSE CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Civil Defense ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Total Additions Civil Defense 410 Amount REPLACE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR Civil Defense Sirens 20,000 2006 Civil Defense Sirens 20,000 2007 Civil Defense Sirens 20,000 2008 Civil Defense Sirens 20,000 2009 Civil Defense Sirens 20,000 2010 Total Expenses FUND BALANCE 69,547 58,547 47,547 36,547 25,547 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 14,453 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 14,453 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 20,000 58,547 47,547 36,547 25,547 20,000 -3- CITY OF LAKE ELMO CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Building Dept. CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Building Dept. ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Total Additions Building Dept. 410 Amount REPLACE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR Vehicle 18,000 2006 Vehicle 21,000 2008 Vehicle 24,000 2010 16,735 5,735 14,735 2,735 12,735 7,000 9,000 9,000 10,000 10,000 7,000 9,000 9,000 10,000 10,000 18,000 21,000 24,000 Total Expenses 18,000 0 21,000 0 24,000 FUND BALANCE 5,735 14,735 2,735 12,735 -1,265 -4- CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Fire Equipment ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Fire Dept. 410 CITY OF LAKE ELMO CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Fire Equipment Amount REPLACE 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR 29,898 -7,159-406,159-1,016,159 -976,159 -936,159 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 Total Additions 40,000 0 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 1. Vehicles Heavy Rescue 300,000 2006 Command Vehicle 50,000 2006 Ladder/Pumper 650,000 2007 Rescue Boat 15,000 2006 II. Equipment Tum Out Gear Thermal Imaging Camera Laptops 300,000 50,000 15,000 16,000 2006 16,000 12,000 2006 12,000 6,000 2006 6,000 650,000 Total Expenses 0 399,000 650,000 0 0 0 FUND BALANCE 69,898-406,159-1,016,159 -976,159 -936,159 -896,159 (See Note) Note: Additional Financing Resources will be required for 2006-2010. Potential Sources being considered includes State/Federal Grant and Equipment leasing options. In addition the recommendation of the fire study suggests that the timming and nature of long term Capital Equipment acquistions needs further review. -5- CITY OF LAKE ELMO Public Works Equipment ITEM Amount REPLACE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS 273,275 320,575 365,575 365,575 427,575 60,000 70,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 Total Additions 60,000 70,000 70,000 75,000 75,000 Bob Cat Trade-in 4,659 2006 5,700 TBD TBD TBD TBD Backhoe 7,000 2006 7,000 Black Top Roller 10,000 2007 10,000 Wood Chipper 30,000 2008 30,000 Pick -Up 40,000 2008 40,000 Air Compressor 13,000 2009 13,000 Dump Truck 150,000 2010 150,000 Generator 15,000 2007 15,000 Total Expenses FUND BALANCE TBD= To Be Determined 12,700 25,000 70,000 13,000 150,000 320,575 365,575 365,575 427,575 352,575 Public Works 410 -6- CITY OF LAKE ELMO CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Parks Equipment CAPITAL ACQUISITION -Parks Equipment ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Amount REPLACE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 YEAR 19,453 11,453 41,453 36,453 71,453 20,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 Total Additions 20,000 30,000 35,000 35,000 40,000 Pick -Up 25,000 2006 25,000 Trailer (Mower} 3,000 2006 3,000 Pick -Up 40,000 2008 40,000 Total Expenses 28,000 0 40,000 FUND BALANCE 11,453 41,453 36,453 71,453 111,453 0 0 Parks 410 -7- ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Parks Dedication .Total Additions Crriage Station DeMonireville Park PavillIon DeMontrevIlle Wildlife Heights Park Ball Field :Play Structure Heritage Park Pet Park Tenn Homestead Park Klels Park Lake Jane Hills Park OU Lions Park Resurface Pebble Park Tennis Court Resurface Reid Park Parkinn Lot Playground Equipment Ridge Park Sanctuary Master Plan Futuna Amenities Stonegate Park Sunfish Lake Park Master Preservation Plan Tablyn Park Replace Equipment Tennis Court Overlay Mill & Overlay Park Lot & Driveway Tana Ridge Park Landscaping, Benches VFW Park Ballfield Improvements CITY OF LAKE ELMO Capital Improvement Program Amount YEAR 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 343,619 126,619 71,619 90,619 79,619 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 70,000 I II 70,000 I 70,000 I 70,000 I 70,000 r 70,000 40,000 2006 40,000 0,000 2006 30,000 11 25,000 2007 1 25,000 1 2006 I 25,000 1 5,000 1 2010 .000 2006 12,000 1 20,000 2007 12,000 2007 2,000 I 2007 5,000 2006 6,000 I 4,000 ,000 2006 5,000 2006 1 5,000 28,000 2006 25,000 15,000 2007 6,000 2006 5,000 10,000 2006 10,000 5,000 I 1 25,000 20,000 I 12,000 2,000 1,000 15,000 Mlsc. ' Trail Improvements 1 150,000 50,000 PatkiqOfitbARIalitUptialkWia,AMWAI 'ilttii,M000W1 Total Expenses I -1. 287,000 I 125,000 FUND BALANCE 126,619 71,619 1,000 5,000 1,000 1,000 50,000 50,000 I 60,000 51,000 1 81,000 56,000 90,619 79,619 93,619 -8- CITY OF LAKE ELMO INFRASTRUCTURE RESERVE I Non MSA ITEM Amount YEAR 2006 2007 2000 200$ 2010 FUND BALANCE 42.719 9.871 -250,957 -323.741 -238,472 ADDITIONS T,sfFrom General Fund 186.000 100.000 100.000 100.000 100'000 Assessments 78.764 108.750 132.529 147'495 155'606 Total Additions - 243.764 208.750 232,529 247,495 265�OG - U - 100,000 10 '. ' ~0U.UUO' ` 1 '' 00 '100,000 Irish Avenue &Ovedoy) 20.625 2006 20625 Ironwood Trail Reclaim &Overlay 51.950 2006 51.950 27thStreet (Reclaim &Overlay) 72.575 3006 72.575 28thStreet (Reclaim &Overlay) 10.838 2006 10.838 27thCourt (Reclaim &Overlay) 20.625 2006 20.625 Lisbon (Reclaim &Overlay) 35,550 2007 35.550 Legion Lane (Reclaim &Overlay) 115'550 2007 115'550 Legion Circle (Reclaim &Overlay) 13.338 2007 13.398 Legion Court (Reclaim &Overlay) 11.118 2007 11.113 21atStreet (Reclaim &Overlay) 103.338 2007 103.338 Ivy Coury(Reclaim @Overlay) 18.338 2007 18.338 Isle Ave (42nd-Cu|dasac) 29.338 2007 29.338 Irvine Circle (Reclaim &Overlay) 26.063 2007 26.663 Irvine Court (Reclaim &Overlay) 22.350 2007 22.350 Laveme(Reclaim &Overlay) 37'775 2008 37.775 Layton (Reclaim &Overlay) 43.338 3008 43.338 Leeward (Reclaim &Overlay) 74.450 3008 74.450 11NhStreet (Reclaim &Overlay) 25.975 2008 25.075 1%thStreet (Reclaim &Overlay) 17.775 2008 17.775 Isle ave(Jamana-Cu|desac) 62'225 2009 1OthStreet 2009 53ndSbeei 2009 Highlands Trail 2010 59th&HytraU 2010 1OthStreet Court 2010 Total Expenses FUND BALANCE 276/513 475,578 299.313 162.225 100.000 Note: Additional Financing Resources will be Required to complete 2006-2009projscts' MSA CONTRUCTION-402 ITEM FUND BALANCE State Contribution Assessments MSA Construction 402 CITY OF LAKE ELMO MSA CONSTRUCTION Amount Replace 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year 311,126 32,277 121,457 260,205 -233,328 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 Total Additions 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 200,000 45th & Julep Overlay 145,000 2006 145,000 Keats Ave 220,000 2006 220,000 Kimbro/50th Street Reconstruction 630,000 2009 630,000 Laverne Avenue & 33rd 335,500 2010 335,500 20th/Manning & Trails 1,102,500 2010 1,102,500 Total Expenses 478,849 110,819 61,252 693,533 1,499,725 FUND BALANCE 32,277 121,457 260,205 -233,328 -1,533,053 ITEM WATER 601 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WATER ENTERPISE CAPITAL FUNDS Amount Replace 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Year FUND BALANCE 4,684,863 1,680,205 1,690,321 1,714,321 1,791,557 ADDITIONS (WAC) 525,000 525,000 396,000 396,000 396,000 Total Additions Projects 4,051,500 551,500 432,000 432,000 432,000 Watermain Replacement (Jamaca) 450,000 2006 450,000 Elevated Storage Tank 1,200,000 2006 1,200,000 Water Main Ext. Jamaca to Tower 600,000 2006 600,000 Well #2 Modifications 50,000 2006 50,000 Tablyn Park Connect 3,500,000 2006 3,500,000 Well # 2 - Sanctuary -Discovery -Deer Glen 555,000 2006 555,000 Pressure Reduction Valves 90,000 2006 90,000 Water Main Extensions OV-31 st Hwy 5 800,000 2010 800,000 Remove Old Water Storage 41,000 2010 41,000 South Well # 3 Pump & Pump House Elevated Storage Tank Water Main Oversizing Replace Water Mains Total Expenses FUND BALANCE 550,000 2010 550,000 1,750,000 2010 1,750,000 500,000 2010 500,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 50,000 7,056,159 541,384 408,000 354,764 3,995,764 1,680,205 1,690,321 1,714,321 1,791,557 -1,772,208 -11- Sewer Enterprise ITEM SEWER 602 CITY OF LAKE ELMO SEWER ENTERPISE CAPITAL FUNDS Amount Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 FUND BALANCE 124,536 459,756 -684,331 -729,741 -574,279 ADDITIONS Sewer Access Charge 360,000 360,000 180,000 180,000 180,000 Assessments (Eagle Point) 19,109 19,109 Total Additions 379,109 379,109 180,000 180,000 180,000 Study 2006 20,000 Main OV-94 2007 Relocate -Sewer Main 1-94 2008 1,500,000 200,000 Total Expenses 43,889 1,523,196 225,410 24,539 23,641 FUND BALANCE 459,756 -684,331 -729,741 -574,279 -417,920 Storm Water Enterprise ITEM FUND BALANCE ADDITIONS Storm Water 603 CITY OF LAKE ELMO Storrn Water Capital Enterprise Amount Year 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 26,372 39,372 -109,628 -77,128 7,172 78,000 81,000 82,500 84,300 86,100 Total Additions 78,000 81,000 82,500 84,300 86,100 PROJECT Storm Sewer Mapping 2006 20,000 Vac. Trailer 2006 45,000 Old Village Regional Property Aq. 20,000 2007 25,000 Old Village Regional Pond Cons. 150,000 2007 150,000 Old Village Storm Sewer Improvements 50,000 2007 50,000 Emergency Equipment 5,000 2007 5,000 Old Village Storm Sewer Improvements 50,000 2008 50,000 Mini Excavator Total Expenses FUND BALANCE 2010 50,000 65,000 230,000 50,000 0 50,000 39,372 -109,628 -77,128 7,172 43,272 -13- Lake Elmo City Council December 6, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 9C Agenda Item: Final Plat and Development Agreement — "Sanctuary of Lake Elmo" Background Information for December 6. 2005: The developer has presented the Final Plat and Final Landscape Plan for this 55/62 lot OP development on 175 acres for which the City Council approved a Preliminary Plat and OP Development Stage Plan/CUP on October 4, 2005. Staff has reviewed the Final Plat and Construction Plans and finds that the developer has complied with and/or incorporated the specific project design conditions of the Preliminary Plat approval resolution. Note that Outlots G through M will not be legally "buildable" until such time as the Zoning Ordinance is amended to allow 18 units per 40 acres in OP projects as prescribed by the adopted Comprehensive Plan. Once the Code amendment is adopted by the City the owner of the 7 outlots will need to have a new Final Plat approved converting those outlots to buildable lots. City Staff (including the City Engineer and City Attorney) has prepared a.Development Agreement for the project. Somewhat unique features of this Agreement include: 1. Nearly two miles of water main oversizing credit (from 8 inches'to 16 inches). 2. Credit toward the Public Use Dedication Fee for fee title to 6.3 acres (neighborhood park site — Outlot D) and site grading/seeding , and over Y2 mile of asphalt trail that will be "public" by easement to the City. All other content of the Agreement in standard City requirements, terms, and conditions. The attached Resolution approves the Final Plat, Final OP Plan and Development Agreement. Action items: i 38 Motion to adopt Resolution #2005 - , approving the Final Plat, Final OP Plan and Development Agreement of "Sanctuary of Lake Elmo". Attachments: 1:38 1. Draft Resolution #2005 - , Approving Final Plat, OP Plan and Development Agreement 2. Draft Development Agreement 3. Final Plat 4. Approved Preliminary Plat 5. Resolution #2005-106 — Preliminary Plat Approval Person responsible: e Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-138 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT FINAL PLAT, FINAL PLAN, AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT OF SANCTUARY OF LAKE ELMO WHEREAS, on the 30th day of November, 2005, the Lake Elmo Development Company, ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve an Open Space Preservation Development Final Plat and Development Agreement to be known as SANCTUARY OF LAKE ELMO. The parcel is located southerly of Highway 36 and westerly of Manning Avenue and is legally described as follows. Parcel Legal Descriptions RICHARD AND EILEEN BERGMANN PROPERTY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A, EXHIBIT A, Case No. 259369 PARCEL 1 The East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL 2 Lot 15, Schaefer's Corner, according to the plat on file and of record, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL 3 The north 13.9 feet of Lot 16, Schaefer's Corner, according to the plat thereof on file and of record, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL 4 All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 29, Range 21, excepting therefrom the South 57 rods thereof and excepting therefrom that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter platted as Schaefer's Corner, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL 5 Lot 16, except the north 13.9 feet thereof Schaefer's Corner, according to the plat thereof on file and of record, Washington County, Minnesota. PARCEL 6 That part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter and that part of the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter, all in Section 1, Township 29, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota, described together as follows: Beginning at the northeast comer of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence on a bearing of South 89 degrees 47 minutes 30 seconds West, (bearings based upon the Washington County Coordinate System), along the north line of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter a distance of 353.59 feet; thence South 0 degrees 19 minutes 54 seconds East, 294.59 feet to the intersection of the southerly right of way line of State Highway No. 36; thence continue South 0 degrees 19 minutes 54 seconds East, 292.32 feet; thence South 61 degrees 31 minutes 55 seconds West, 226.42 feet; thence South 83 degrees 20 minutes 18 seconds West, 323.13 feet; thence South 89 degrees 45 minutes 35 seconds West 257.62 feet; thence South 0 degrees 00 minutes 32 seconds East, 675.77 feet to the south line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 59 minutes 11 seconds East, along said south line, 474.94 feet to the southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northwest Quarter; thence North 88 degrees 58 minutes 56 seconds East along the south line of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter; thence North 0 degrees 19 minutes 54 seconds West along the east line of said West Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter 1095.94 feet of the intersection of the southerly right of way line of said State Highway No. 36; thence continue North 0 degrees 19 minutes 54 seconds West 294.39 feet to the 2 point of beginning. Subject to easements of record. RICHARD AND EILEEN BERGMANN PROPERTY COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A, Case No. 255529 The South 27 Rods of the Northeast Quarter of Section 1, Township 29, Range 21 and also that part of the Southwest Quarter of Section 1, Township 29, Range 21, and also that part of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter of Section 6, Township 29, Range 20, Washington County, Minnesota, that is described as follows: Beginning at the southwest corner of the Northwest Quarter of said Section 6; thence North 88 degrees 45 minutes 42 seconds East, along the south line of said Northwest Quarter for 4.78 feet; thence North 19 degrees 28 minutes 18 seconds West for 15.27 feet to the West line of said Northwest Quarter; thence South 1 degree 14 minutes 50 seconds East along said west line for 14.50 feet to the point of beginning. HELEN S. AND ALVIN O. BERGMANN TRUST COMMITMENT FOR TITLE INSURANCE SCHEDULE A, EXHIBIT A, Case No. 250534 All that part of the Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of section One (1), in Township Twenty-nine (29) North, of Range Twenty- one (21) West, described as follows: Commencing at the Southeast corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4), thence running North along the East line of the said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4) a distance of Fifty- seven (57) rods; thence West parallel with the North and South boundary lines of the said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4) a distance of Eighty (80) rods, more or less, to the West boundary line; thence South along the West boundary line of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4) a distance of Fifty-seven (57) rods, more or less, to the Southwest corner of said Northeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4 of NE 1/4; thence East along the south boundary line a distance of Eighty (80) rods, more or less, to the point of beginning. AND All that part of the South One-half of the Northeast Quarter (S 1/2 of NE 1/4) of Section One (1) , in Township Twenty-nine (29) North, of Range Twenty-one (21) West, described as follows: Commencing from a point Twenty (27) rods North of the southeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4) of said Section, Township and Range; running thence north along the section line a distance of fifty-three (53) rods to the Northeast corner of the Southeast Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SE 1/4 of NE 1/4); running thence due West parallel with the north and south boundary lines of the said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) a distance of One Hundred Sixty (160) rods, more or less, to the West boundary line of said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4); thence south along said west boundary line a distance of fifty-three (53) rods to a point on said west boundary line twenty-seven (27) rods north of the southwest corner of the Southwest Quarter of the Northeast Quarter (SW 1/4 of NE 1/4); thence due East parallel with the south line of the said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) a distance of One Hundred Sixty (160) rods, more or less, to the east boundary line of said Northeast Quarter (NE 1/4) to the point of beginning. TOTAL AREA 82.00 ACRES AND Also all that portion of the Southwest Quarter of the Northwest Quarter (SW 1/4 4 of NW 1/4) of section Six (6), in Township Twenty-nine (29) North, of Range Twenty (20) West, lying west of the Town Road as it now traverses said Section Six (6). Subject to easements of record. TOTAL AREA --- 1.69 ACRES WHEREAS, at its October 4, 2005 meeting, the City Council reviewed and unanimously recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat, Development Stage Plan, and Conditional Use Permit of SANCTUARY OF LAKE ELMO for the division of those parcels into 62 residential lots. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Approves the Open Space Final Plat and Development Agreement for SANCTUARY OF LAKE ELMO as illustrated on a Lake Elmo Development Company plat prepared by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc., staff dated November 30, 2005 with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with recommendations of City Engineer. 2. Compliance with recommendations of Valley Branch Watershed District that the City Engineer finds to practical and reasonable. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 6th day of December, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT CITY OF LAKE ELMO Sanctuary of Lake Elmo 1.00 Parties. This Agreement is dated the day of . 2005, and is entered into by and between City of Lake Elmo, a Minnesota municipal corporation (herein "City"); and The Sanctuary, LLC, a Minnesota limited liability company (herein "Developer"). 2,00 Property Description. The Developer represents that it is the record fee owner of property described on Exhibit A, attached and incorporated herein, which will be platted as Sanctuary of Lake Elmo. 3.00 Final Plat Approval. On the day of , 2005, the City Council approved the final plat of Sanctuary of Lake Elmo, which is attached and incorporated as Exhibit B . The City's approval was conditioned upon the Developer entering into this Development Contract. 4.00 Terms and Conditions. NOW, THEREFORE, in reliance upon the representations contained herein; in compliance with the City's Zoning and Subdivision Regulations; and in consideration of the mutual undertakings herein expressed, the parties agree as follows: 4.01 Developer Improvements. The Developer shall construct the following improvements in compliance with plans and specifications which have been reviewed and approved by the City's Consulting Engineer, which are attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit C: A. Site Grading and Turf Restoration. Site grading improvements shall include common excavation, subgrade correction, embankment and pond excavation. Turf restoration shall include seeding, mulching and erosion control. 1. Site Grading Improvements shall be completed on or before the 30th day of June, 2006. 2. Turf restoration improvements shall be completed on or before the 30th day of September, 2006. B. Landscaping. Developer shall complete all landscaping improvements on or before the 315t day of October, 2006. C. Storm Sewer. Storm sewer improvements include all necessary storm sewers, catch basins, culverts, and other apparatus. Storm sewer improvements shall be completed by the day of 315t day of July, 2006. D. Street Improvements. Street improvements include subgrade preparation, gravel base, bituminous surfacing, bituminous curb and concrete curbs, where required. Unusable material within the roadway shall be removed by the Developer. All subgrade excavation and filling shall be completed by the Developer in accordance with MNDOT's specifications. The City reserves the right to test as necessary, at the Developer's expense, all grading work. A test roll of the street subgrade shall be passed prior to acceptance of the subgrade by the City. 3 Subgrade and the initial course of street improvements shalt be completed by the day of August 31st, 2006. The final wear course of the street shalt be completed by the -th ..5U day of September, 2007. E. Waste Water Treatment System/Drain Field. The waste water treatment system/drain field shall be comprised of a series of pipes, septic tanks, treatment ponds, drain fields and appurtenances, and shall be completed prior to the issuance of any certificates of occupancy. F. Street Signs. The City will order and install street signs. The Developer shall pay for all costs incurred by the City. G. Water Main. Water main improvements include pipes, hydrants and appurtenances and shalt be completed on or before the 315t day of July, 2006. Developer is over -sizing water mains and installing additional mains not required for the project and the City shall reimburse Developer in the amount of $ 226,465 for such over -sizing and additional mains. H. Historic Barn Preservation. The developer shall restore the barn structure on Outlot A in accordance with plans approved by the City Building Official. Said restoration improvements shall be in an amount of not less than $25,000 as determined by the City Building Official. The developer has been allowed one additional building lot within the development as compensation for the historic barn restoration. 4.02 Estimated Cost of Developer Secured Improvements. The estimated costs of Developer constructed improvements are as follows: Improvement Estimated Cost Site Grading/Turf Restoration Browns Creek Watershed Landscaping $ 110,000 Storm Sewer $ 270,600 Street Improvements $ 488,950 Waste Water Treatment System/Drain Fields $ 775,000 Street Signs $ 1,000 Water Mains $ 391,450 Subtotal. $ 1,937,400 Total Security Required (125% of Improvements) = $ 2,421,250 4.03 Improvement Security. Prior to the City's endorsement of approval on the final plat, the Developer shall deposit security with the City Administrator in an amount equal to 125% of the City Engineer's estimate of the cost of constructing the Developer secured improvements which have not been completed and accepted by the City prior to final plat approval. The security may be in the form of a cash escrow fund, a performance bond, or a letter of credit. The form of security shall be approved by the City Attorney. 4.04 Reduction of Security. Upon completion of required improvements for the Property and acceptance by the City, the City Council shall reduce the amount of security for the completed improvements provided that in no case shall the total remaining security be equal to less than 125% of the estimated costs of the incomplete improvements. 4.05 Administrative Fees. Developer agrees to pay an administrative fee to the City in an amount equal to 2.5% of the Developer's secured improvements. The administrative fee for this project equals $60,531. 4.06 Utility Company Improvements. The utility improvements include underground gas, electric, and telephone service as installed by the appropriate utility company at the direction of the Developer. The Developer shall arrange for the installation of underground gas, electric, telephone and cable television before the final lift is started. Utility improvements shall be completed by the 30th day of September, 2006. 4.07 Recording Requirements. Prior to the conveyance of any of the lots in Sanctuary, and except as hereinafter provided, prior to the issuance of any development permits, the Developer shall provide the City with evidence that the following documents have been recorded. A. Plat. B. A Declaration of Covenants in a form approved by the City's Attorney. The Declaration of Covenants shall include the following provisions: 1. Require the Homeowner Association to be responsible for the Owner's obligations as contained in the appropriate Conservation or Open Space Easements. 2. Require the Homeowner Association to maintain and operate the waste water treatment system/drain field. Provide that, in the event of a failure by the Homeowner Association to satisfy the obligations defined in Section 4.07B and its subdivisions of this Development Agreement, as determined by the City's Consulting Engineer, the City may undertake such obligations and assess all costs incurred to the Homeowner Association; and in such event, the Developer for itself and for the Homeowner Association hereby waives the requirements otherwise imposed. by MS 429. 4. Provide that any provisions in the Covenants relating to the obligations defined in Section 4.07B and its subdivisions of this Development Agreement may not be repealed or amended without consent of the City. C. Homeowner Association Articles of Incorporation. D. An Open Space or a Conservation Easement from the land owner to the City and the Minnesota Land Trust as the City in its sole discretion deems appropriate, attached and incorporated as herein Exhibit D and Exhibit E and covering Outlots A, B, C, D, E, F and G, Sanctuary. E. The public trailway easement attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit F. F. Browns Creek Watershed Permit. 4 4.08 Public Use Dedication. The Developer's public use dedication requirement for Sanctuary of Lake Elmo is $392,000 and shall consist of the following: A. a payment in the amount of $224,018; B. the dedication or conveyance of the public trail easement; C. the construction of the public traitway per plans approved by the City Engineer at a cost to the Developer of $ 22,792, Total project trail is 11,270 less 8,680 required, resulting in 2,590 l.f. of trail at $8.80 per lineal foot. D. conveyance of fee title to the City for Outlot D (credit $128,000); and E. grading and seeding of Outlot D per plans approved by the City Superintendent of Public Works and the City Engineer (credit $17,690. 4,09 Inspection. The City shall provide the services of a Resident Project Representative (and assistants as agreed) at the site to provide more continuous observation of the Contractor(s) work. The Resident Project Representative's dealings in matters pertaining to the on -site work shall in general, be only with The City and the Developer, and dealings with contractors shall only be through or with full knowledge of the Developer. Through the observations of the work in progress and field checks of materials and equipment by the Resident Project Representative shall endeavor to provide further protection for the City against defects and deficiencies in the work of the Contractor; but the furnishing of such resident Project representation will not make City responsible for construction means, methods, techniques, sequences or procedures or for safety precautions or programs, or for the Contractor's failure to perform his work in accordance with the Contract Documents. The developer shall pay the City the sum of $70,000 for the City inspection services. The City shall be provided a minimum of 24 hours notice prior to the commencement of underground pipe laying; and prior to subgrade, gravel base, and bituminous surface construction. Developer's failure to comply with the terms of this section shall permit the City Engineer to issue a stop work order which may result in rejection of the work and which shall obligate the Developer to take all reasonable steps, as directed by the City's Engineer, to insure that the improvements are constructed and inspected pursuant to the terms of this Agreement; and shall further result in the assessment of a penalty in an amount equal to 1%, per occurrence, of the amount of security required in Section 4.03 of this Agreement. 4.10 Prior Land Occupancy. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued for any homes until the first course of a public street is completed and approved by the City Engineer. If homes are occupied prior to completion of street improvements and acceptance by the City, Developer shall provide all maintenance necessary for such streets including snowplowing, until final acceptance by the City. 4.11 Future Lots. Outlots G, H, I, J, K, L and M, Sanctuary may be utilized as future single family residential home sites upon approval of appropriate changes to the City's Comprehensive Plan and zoning ordinance. In the interim, the Developer shall be responsible for maintenance of such Outlots. 4.12 Binding Effect. The terms and provisions of this agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, representatives, successors and assigns of the parties hereto and shall be binding upon all future owners of all or any part of the Property. This Agreement, at the option of the City, shall be placed of record so as to give notice thereto to any subsequent purchasers and encumbrancers of all or any part of the Property and all recording fees, if any, shall be paid by the Developer. 4.13 Notices. Whenever in this Agreement notice is required to be given by one party to the other, such notice shall be delivered personally or shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested to the following addressees. Such notice shall be deemed timely given when delivered personally or when deposited in the mail in accordance with this section. If to the City: Mr. Martin Rafferty City Administrator City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 If to the Developer: The Sanctuary, LLC 12415 55th Street North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 4.14 Incorporation by Reference. All plans, special provisions, proposals, specifications and contracts for the improvements furnished and let 6 pursuant to this Agreement shall be and hereby are made a part of this Agreement by reference as if fully set out herein. 4.15 Default. The occurrence of any of the following shall be considered an "event of default" in the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement: A. Failure of the Developer to comply with any of the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement. B. The failure of the Developer to comply with any applicable ordinance or statute with respect to the development of the Property. 4.16 Remedies. Upon the occurrence of any event of default, the City, in addition to any other remedy which may be available to it, shall be permitted to do any of the following: A. City may make advances or take other steps to cure the default, and, where necessary, enter the Property for that purpose. The Developer shall pay all sums so advanced or expenses incurred by the City, upon demand, with interest from the dates of such advances or expenses at the rate of 10% per annum. No action taken by the City pursuant to this section shall be deemed to relieve the Developer from curing any such default to the extent that it is not cured by the City or from any other default hereunder. The City shall not be obligated, by virtue of the existence or exercise of this right, to perform any such act or cure any such default. The Developer shall save, indemnify, and hold harmless, including reasonable attorney fees, the City from any liability or other damages which may be incurred as a result of the exercise of the City's rights pursuant to this section. B. Obtain an Order from a Court of competent jurisdiction requiring the Developer to specifically perform its obligations pursuant to the terms and provisions of this Agreement. C. Exercise any other remedies which may be available to it including an action for damages. D. Withhold the issuance of any or all building permits and/or prohibit the occupancy of all building(s) for which permits have been issued. In addition to the remedies and amounts payable as set forth herein, upon the occurrence of an event of default, the Developer 7 shall pay to the City all fees and expenses, including reasonable attorney, engineering and consulting fees, incurred by the City as a result of the event of default, whether or not a lawsuit or other action is formally taken. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and Developer have caused this Agreement to be executed as of the date and year first above written. CITY OF LAKE ELMO, a Minnesota statutory city Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ) ss. COUNTY OF ) On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared Dean Johnston and Martin Rafferty, to me known to be respectively the Mayor and City Administrator of the City of Lake Elmo, and they executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same by authority of and on behalf of City of Lake Elmo. Notary Public [SIGNATURES CONTINUED ON FOLLOWING PAGE REMAINDER OF PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK] 9 STATE OF MINNESOTA ) ss. COUNTY OF The Sanctuary, LLC By: Printed Name: Its: On this day of , 2005, before me, a notary public within and for said county, personally appeared . to me known to be the of , a Minnesota limited liability company, and he executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged that he executed the same by authority of and on behalf of the company. Notary Public [SIGNATURES PAGE TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT] 10 11,150,00100 6001.1ry CAST WON 1.1041.110£01 COR. SEC r2.4 46 4101*4 011E 1 4, 5 1, 170 R21 4.0.30 Sfir5VIer 4,4.94 0A5014*4t0N MONTY VAST /RON 4147*4010707 MR, SEC t, 72.9. 421 fif 580.06504 c 5515,555 C0111117 6+157 /000' AIONIAVENT N 1/5 OW. Ste" 1. r,g, R,71 $. / 170Z 5555055 I 550554.111315515.- F54 01,20110,11' 4 a 5555. 550 5t 55,5H=511, !I Mar:0 E 264025 MINNESOTA STATE HIGHWAY 36 60TH STREET NORTH OUTLGIT \ .1.517e4r , f.sw '1,43).4Wede 0,s4eVJril 4(0 +.1 55 5572. 4,525355 / )013.DP 55255555 i=ky 55549,25 00 --11.155.0 0;1741 :51719' :" BLOCK 0 - 10,00.LITY ..00100:., [" 0205/7 7 0. --- 4 01.21.0 • ----- BLOCK 3 114 ,1010,0 V1=1.00 6il OUTLOTD .1,117,1 04600 11BLOC S tt441 1.70 ------ NO0'417.85"11 \ OUTLOT E 552155,5- ...OP 1555, *4.420*4245 I)BLOC 3 e.b smer BLOCK 21 5 I, 020, R21 -- NOR TH .55 ----- 4 1 '1 2044 1: :4040.84 3 2920.05 BLOCK 1 18.8, -1--M7 2 =2421 36' .00 .9 55 2 VAC. T0.4511.61001 001,,NTY G+15"1" AVON 4.10101ANNT NE CM, SEC 1, r29, R2f 515,5555.5.5. -^610501, ,0001 1 SANCTUARY OF LAKE ELMO , 4,75.30'40" 05 11=8.28.04 ;,," IA.240,41 C.E.JI 0.02 ca=moves „ 049'33t0. 460030.5? 3,110,50 C12.110.01 ..02i.m318,2.7'90"7 4n8ee 4.41r .40 Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. LAND PLANNING 4 SIJRVEYING 4 ENGINEERING " 5620 MINORIAL AVENUE NORTH STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 55081 Plum 1650 139,11833 fa (651) 430.9331 ORWMAL SCALE d90CH 150 FEE r SCALE IN Fru LEGEND , DENOTES 15 11404 X 14 INCH NOY P1PF MONVAILTir MARKED icor A PL4517C CAP /N50Y/0ED 'FREEMAN ZS 16969., UNLESS 500141V OTHERINSE DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT; SIZE AND MAR1*1NGS AS 04DICAIE0 NOTES 2R46NTA11014 OF 01/2 REARING SYSTIjIl 15 RASED ON THE WAS90010TON COUNTY CO0ROVIA TE SISTEV, SOU 11-1 ICWC. 29.10If 0.20.40R 555r405''Irl;,5"M'W.5 *_ I MP.,L g 14 , ---- I I 8 7 Y28.1 .04 SS.P. •Vir0 OR444A0W AND tITUTY EASEki E 0 US: 5 - 10- DEM 5 FEET w WOW, U0*70.01046106?ASE 1044CATED, AND AWNING LOT UNES.'AND 10 FEE,CAN NON AND A0,1004010 WHY' WA,M BOCK UNES, AND liE7LAND BUFFER EASEMENTS AS SNOW ON THE PLAT. w st AREA .34.66 SF R *g, s.ai, 104 of the SW 1A Seaton 1. T29, 4.78 Section 6. TM R2D South 11. ot the NE VA of the NW f,..e4 at DErAx. --- Sectto'0 f'20, R --- --- wA.V111.100N c41N1Y casi WON AtOnumnor 1 1 00,S: SEC f, 120, R2t Cast km Rontz. SANCTUARY �oUed. •••••42, -F• )t. ; SANCTUAR LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA ' PRELIMINARY PLAT GRADING & DRAINAGE (SOUTH) ,,rsyttiCart: ;‘,,`• „, „ .." /'rev ".t • „. r" +.1 ,' .... • , , I t 6 A • "1 01,10, A ," kll 1 , 111111 7- CT —yF„loi , •-• , r ( ,•54.te41. ra=411:429! ,,,,I I 1.110,11 "oil I."— Ausile1111 1111.1111111111.1161.1.1 .1 '$ 1 1 I Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc. LAND PLANNING • SURVEYING • ENGINEERING 111 11 5620 MEMORIAL A NORTH a STILLWATER, MINNESOTA 5502 Phone (651) 439,8833 Fax (651) 430-9331 0 DEVELOPME*T i3ERGALON Pli0PER±T2' LEGEND SCALA AY nat. " " "'.• ' 0 60 100 lc I 10011 0110FUT (RONAL FLU 11CA.1) EXISTING CONTOUR PROPOSED CONTOUR PROPOSED STORM SEWER MH, °MOH & FES EXISTING TREE LINE PROPOSED PONDING AREA EXISTING WETLAND BOUNDARY NOTES i) 2000 WASHINGTON COUNTY AERIAL PHOTO LI11LIZE6 2) COUNTY AERIAL DATA & SHOT TOPO UTILIZED •CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO, 2005-106 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OP DEVELOPMENT STAGE PLAN, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, AND PRELIMINARY PLAT OF THE SANCTUARY WHEREAS, at its July 19, 2005 meeting,the City Council approved the Concept Plan for THE SANCTUARY, WHEREAS, Lake Elmo Development Company, Richard and Eileen Bergmann, and Trustees for the Alvin and Helen Bergmann Trust, made application for an OP Developinent Stage Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Preliminary Plat, THE SANCTUARY, to create 62 residential building lots and. seven outlots on. a parcel of 152.9 acres legally described as follows: The property is generally located south of Highway 36 and westerly of Manning Avenue. The subject properties lie easterly and southerly of Country Sun Farm,. The parcels included are legally described as follows: Parcel X.D. Numbers 01.029.21.11.0001 01.029.21.11.0002 01.029.21.11.0003 01.029.21.11.0005 01.029.21.11.0007 01,029.21.12.0001 01.029.21.13.0001 01.029.21.13.0002 01.029.21.21.0006 (the easterly 23 +1- acres 06.029.20.23.0001 WHEREAS, at its September 26, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this Development Stage Plan/CUP/Preliminary Plat with conditions. WHEREAS, the OP Development Stage Plan, the Conditional Use Permit and Preliminary Plat of THE SANCTUARY was presented to the City Council at its October 4, 2005 City Council Meeting; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Lake Elmo does hereby approve and accept the OP Development Stage Plan, Conditional Use Permit, and Preliminary Plat of THE SANCTUARY, per plans staff dated September 7, 2005, as the, same on file with the City Administrator, based on the following Conditions: 1. Compliance with recommendations of the City Attorney and the City Engineer's recommendations, excluding the roundabouts. 2. To incorporate a T intersection on the east/west road at the south end of the plat into the future MSA road. . Roads are to be onstructed at 22 feet in width except where MSA standards will require 26 feet in width. 4. Compliance with the recommendation of Browns Creek Watershed District as found to be practical and/or applicable by the City Engineer. 5. Compliance with the recommendations of the Park Superintendent and Parks Commission regarding park and trail development by the developer and park dedication fees in lieu of land. 6, The OP Final Plan submission shall include construction details and cost estimates for the restoration of the historic barn on site. Plans and costs shall be concurred in by the Building Official as to structural integrity and compliance with the S25O00 minimum restoration expenditure. 7. Lots 1-7, Block 2 (as numbered on the Preliminary Plat) shall be reduced in lot depth, and Outlot B increased in area to preclude private property ownership of any portion of MN DNR Protected Wetland #82-316W or the 15 foot vegetative buffer to the wetland required by Valley Branch Watershed District. 8. Lots designated in red on the copy of the preliminary plat that has been signed by the City Planner, dated October 4, 2005, shall not be developed unless the City changes its regulations to permit a greater density, and if the City does not permit a greater density, those lots will become land trust conservation easements or open space easements. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 4th day of Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST; Resol Sanctuary OP Elmo ,y Council iecembcr 6, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use and Zoning No. 99 Agenda Item: CDBG -2006 Background Information for December 6, 2005: Washington County is soliciting 2006 CDBG applications from communities, with official applications due December 16. All funding will again be on a competitive basis, with a certainty that applications will be submitted well in excess of funds available. To date the City has received CDBG contract obligations totaling $120,000 for the Cimarron Gas Service Replacement Program. That program is under way, with eligibility interviews completed for the initial block of 200+ homes. It appears that of that initial group, 62 homeowners have been interviewed and as many as 54 will be eligible for grant assistance. Work will commence on those homes in early 2006, Depending on the outcome of the re -solicitation of bids for the work, it appears that the S120,000 now under contract will be sufficient to complete the work on well under 100 homes. It has been assumed all along that additional CDBG funding would be needed to complete work for all eligible grantees with work needed in the 505 unit neighborhood. Staff suggests the Council consider again applying for CDBG funding to both inspect the balanced of the CDBG units and to provide further grant funds for additional eligible home owners from the Phase 1 group and the group that results from the additional inspections. We suggest an additional $80,000 be applied for from the 2006 CDBG program. The attached Resolution would accompany the application to the County. Person responsible: Action items: Motion to adopt Resolution #2005-139 , approving the City's City Planner 2006 CDBG aplication. Attachments: Time Allocated: I. Draft Resolution #2005-139Approving CDBG Application CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-139 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE 2006 CDBG APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council has authorized and directed the City's Community Improvement Commission to review priorities for the application of Lake Elmo's 2004 Community Development Block Grant allocation, and make its recommendations to the City Council regarding the content of the 2005-2006 CDBG Grant Application; and, WHEREAS, the Community Improvement Commission has reviewed the priorities for application of CDBG allocation funds, and provided its unanimous recommendation to the City Council to apply 100% of the 2006 CDBG allocation (estimated to be $80,000) to a continuation of the Cimarron Neighborhood Gas Service Rehabilitation Project. WHEREAS, Phase I of the Cimarron Neighborhood Gas Service Rehabilitation Project has been well received by the Cimarron homeowners; these additional funds will provide remediation for a larger percentage of qualifying homeowners. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council concurs in the recommendation of the Community Improvement Commission regarding the 2006 CDBG allocation application; and, authorizes and directs the Acting City Administrator to prepare and submit the 2006 CDBG Application to Washington County responsive to this Resolution of the City Council. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on December 6, 2005. Dean A. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT No. 11. A Council Aober 18, 2005 ovember 1, December 6, 2005 Agenda Item: Ordinance 97-164, Snowmobile Ordinance Modification Badwround: for November 1, 2005: The Council postponed discussion per the request of the Snowmobile Club. At the last City Council Committee meeting, the snowmobile ordinance was reviewed for a possible change. It appears, the issue goes back a couple of years and was considered resolved until WA. CO, Deputies, this past winter, found a conflict in the code vs. an ordinance believed passed that would limit a snowmobile operation near a residential structure. City records show that no ordinance modifying the code was ever passed and finalized. Records also show that an ordinance was prepared to be passed but never finalized addressing area of concern, Utilizing the ordinance that was prepared, the Council Committee modified the proposed ordinance document prohibiting snowmobile operation within 50 feet of a residential structure unless the snowmobile is owned and operated by the property owner. Representatives from the snowmobile club were present and stated that they could live with the change. The City Administrator represented the position ofthe property owner where the conflict arose earlier this year. The change as proposed would now protect residential properties and prohibit snowmobile/all-terrain operators from encroaching no closer than 50 feet from the residential structure on a 24/7/365 basis. Person responsible: Action Items: to adopt Ordinance 97-164 Martin Rafferty, Administrator Attachments: Ordinance 97-16 CITY OF LAKE ELMO ORDINANCE NO. 97-164 AN ORDINANCE INCORPORATING MINNESOTA STATUTES CHAPTER 84; AND SPECIFICALLY RELATING TO THE SNOWMOBILES AND ALL -TERRAIN VEHICLES WITHIN THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ORDAINS THAT CHAPTER 1011 IS HEREBY ADDED TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS: 1011.11 1011 Snowmobiles and All -Terrain Vehicles Incorporation by Reference. Provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 84, as amended from time to time, shall be applicable to the City of Lake Elmo. In those cases where there is a conflict between the provisions of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 84 and this Chapter 1011, the more restrictive regulation shall apply. 1011.12 Definitions. A. All -Terrain Vehicle. "All -Terrain Vehicle" means a motorized flotation — tired vehicle of not less than three (3) low pressure tires, but not more than six (6) tires, that is limited in engine displacement of less than 800 cubic centimeters and total dry wet less than 900 pounds. B. Snowmobile. "Snowmobile" means a self-propelled vehicle designed for travel on snow or ice, steered by skis or runners. 1011.3 Re2nlations, A. No person shall operate a snowmobile or all -terrain vehicle on a public sidewalk or within the unimproved portion of a city street. B. No person shall operate a snowmobile or all -terrain vehicle on city owned property. C. No person shall operate a snowmobile or all -terrain vehicle between the hours of 11:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. D. No person shall operate a snowmobile or all -terrain vehicle within fifty feet (50') of a residential dwelling, which is not owned by the operator of the snowmobile or the all -terrain vehicle. THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL HEREBY REPEALS CHAPTER 1010 AND ITS SUBDIVISONS. The Lake Elmo City Council hereby repeals the following definitions which are not included in Chapter 1050 of the Municipal Code: All -Terrain Vehicle ("ATV") Owner (Snowmobile and Recreational Vehicles) Snowmobile ADOP 1E,D by the Lake Elmo City Council this 6th day of December, 2005, CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty City Administrator Dean Johnston Mayor