Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-16-13 CCMP11 t: (Try Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services in a Fiscally Responsible Manner While Preserving the City's Open Space Character NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo I 3800 Laverne Avenue North AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call D. Order of Business E. Approval of Agenda F. Accept Minutes 1. Accept April 02, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes G. Public Comments/Inquiries H. Presentations 2. Quality Star - Rick Chase Consent Agenda 3. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 4. Accept Financial Report dated March 31, 2013 5. Accept Building Permit Report dated March 31, 2013 6. Well No. 4 -Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids; Resolution 2013- 26 7. Amend Valley Cartage Tax Abatement Resolution; Resolution 2013- 27 8. Approve Wild Adventure Race Spring Sprint - Sunfish Lake Park/Lake Elmo Park Reserve Regular Agenda 9. Speak Your Peace Project; Resolution 2013-28 10. Approve Lake Elmo Wine Company Liquor License - Public Hearing 11. Valley Cartage Group, Inc. M1F - Public Hearing; Resolution 2013- 29 12. Water Surface Use Amendment; Ordinance 08-074 13. Zoning Map Update; Ordinance 08-075 14. Tree Preservation Ordinance; Ordinance 08-076, Resolution 2013- 30 15. Parking Regulations Ordinance Update; Ordinance 08-077, Resolution 2013- 31 16. Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements -Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract; Resolution 2013- 32 17. Authorize the distribution of Lennar's Environmental Assessment Worksheet to Environmental Quality Board K. Summary Reports and Announcements • Mayor • Council • Administrator • City Attorney • Planning Director • City Engineer • Finance Director • Clerk L. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A����� ���� �r----'---- CITY OF LAKE ELM0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02,2013 Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Pearson, Council Members Bloyer, Nelson, and Smith y7-31PM] Also Present: City Administrator ZuJeger, Associate City Attorney 8rekkeo, Planning Director K!att' City Engineer Griffin, Finance Director Bendel, and City Clerk Bell. PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE THEAPRIL 02,2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA /%SPRES8NT0D. Council Member Bkoverseconded the motion. Motion passed 3'0. ITEM 1: ACCEPT MINUTES THE MARCR19\2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WEREAyPROXED AS PRESENTED BY CONSENSUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC COMMENTS Library Board Member Judy Gibson gave update onbook circulation Library hours have increased 10:OO&KX'2:0OPM Monday -Saturday & Tuesday/Thursday additionally from 3:OOPM'8:OOPK8. She noted that one rental space available. Contact Steve DcLapp for more information. Library is actively advertising for full time librarian position. For more information, contact personnel committee. Library isstill receiving bestseller donations, including DVDo. Ms. Gibson noted events at library include: East Metro Writers Room, m/bicb is open Mondays and Wednesdays from 8:]O/\K8to Noon. Also ou the first and third Fridays ofeach month, the library has story time for preschool children. Ms. Gibson noted celebration of National Library Week. Events include a b'e, book bag if patrons check out 3 books. On 4/4 Family Means financial counselor will speak about getting the most from tax refunds; Environcueota|/Sustainobility author VVi|\innn 3ouder visits on 4/11 at 6:30PyM; On 4/17 at7:0OPM a drop -in music jam; Oo4/18at6:30PM library will honor local authors; 4/25 at 3:UOPM library will celebrate National DEAR day (Drop Everything And Read). ITEM 2;NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRUL 14'20 Page 1 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02,2013 ITEM3: COMMUNITY MEDIA WEEK &PRKL22'27 Council Member Bloyer read the proclamation for Community Media Week. The Council proclaimed April 22'27 as Community Media Week. Ramsey/Washington Counties Cable Commission is holding open house on4/Z5. PRESENTATIONS ITEM4. O0ALITY STAR PRESENTATION-RI[K CHASE Item was skipped due to award recipient Rick Chase not able to attend. lTEM 5: LAKE ELMO JAYCEES Sarah Quick represented the Lake Elmo Jaycees, She noted that this is the 43rd year of partnership between the City and the Jaycees. Ms. Quick presented adonation o[$8,OOOtothe City iogratitude for partnership. There was a discussion of the amount and vvberp it will be used. It was reported that last year's donation was |csn and that it usually is used for Lake £]cuo Days. The Council thanked the Jaycees. ITEM 6:8O0TH WA8HINGTON WATERSHED DISTRICT, K4aUL Moore gave update for the watershed district. Also attending were managers Johnson (Woodbury), Madigan. Mr. Moore described the watershed area. It is essentially the Eagle Point Business Park. Working with Cottage Grove and Woodbury on different projects. Reported working with staff to develop web based viewer to obovv the geography contours. Mr. Moore also noted several 2012 accomplishments. Worked with Newport drainage rate; Trout Brook water quality improvements; Grey Cloud Island restoration. Mayor Pearson asked about rain gardens and expected need for maintenance. Mr. Moore said about 10 years is estimated length of time for maintenance to be needed. It is important to get root system established. CONSENT AGENDA 7. Approve Payment o[Disbursements and Payroll o[$9Z'76I.O8 8. ZOl3Seal Coat Project -Amp,ovoP|ausand3Red0catouoandAutborize Advertisement for Bids; Resolution 2013-23, Agreement MOTION: Council Member Blover moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 3'0. REGULAR AGENDA. Page 2 of 7 LAKE EXMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ^�r~~~~~-'~~~13 ITEM 9: STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY - RESOLUTION APPROVING 0WNDOT AGREEMENT NO. 03330 City Engineer Griffin gave summary of grant agreement. Grant amount is for 80% of total amount of S80'000=$64,000.City will bcresponsible for balance oF$16.O0O. Tbc,c will beaminimum of two workshops as well as community meetings. It is meant to be a collaborative project. Council Member Nelson asked about outcome o[survey and how tn get state to be in City's favor. Mr. Cci[bo said the goal is to work with the state to come up with plans and bring proposal to state. MuUOTvvU| be atthe table at various points so there is o product with their buy in. City Administrator %u|eger noted that the study provides an updated view and stressed that itwould becollaborative. The inclusion in [it's ClP was discussed. Mr. GdOio reported that itwas not because there is no specific project approved. Council Member Nelson asked where money will come from. Finance Director Bendel reported her belief that it comes out Capital Fund as it is drafted. Mr. 3ulegerstated that because itisastudy, itactually will come out o[the UodeoiguatcdFund orGeneral Operating Fund. Ms. Bendel noted that the Contingency Fund in the budget is in hert for these types o[itenno. Current Contingency Fund balance isabout $lZO,DOO. Council Mcnoboz B\oyor asked about timeline and i[project will start during the current couod|'s terms? K4c Griffin stated that there needs to be a plan in order to obtain funding. The timing depends oofunding. Council Member Smith arrived at 7:31 P. M, |twas pointed out that atsome point 36isplanned tnbecome a freeway. Council Member Nelson noted while he's not in favor of spending the funds, this is the time to provide input and have a role in planning. Mayor Pearson noted that while some people may not be happy with the study results, itiximportant tooffer aplan atthis stage. MOTION: [ouodY Member Pearson moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2013-24, APPROVING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 03330FOR THE FEDERAL AID FUNDING FOR STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Council Member Snobb noted that her main concerns are safety and improving access Also, it was noted that reducing cut -through traffic is important. Page 3nf 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02, 2013 ITEM 10: STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY - AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE TASK ORDER NO. 1 FOR SRF CONSULTING SERVICES. INC. FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES. City Engineer Griffin explained that this was the task order for the previous item authorizing the Highway 36 Frontage Road Study. The amount of the expenses and the responsible portions was discussed and clarified. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE TASK ORDER NO. 1 TO SRF CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $64,500, Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 11: APPROVE FUND BALANCE/NET ASSETS POLICY City Administrator Zuleger explained the policy and the reasoning for establishing it. It is standard for municipalities to adopt a fund balance use policy. Mr. Zuleger highlighted major sections. Driving factors for adoption include affecting bond rating and having a disciplined policy as the City moves into a stage of growth. Adoption will strengthen the internal controls surrounding the use of these funds and provide clear direction to staff on the monitoring and reporting surrounding those funds. Finance Director Bendel noted Enterprise Fund item #3(periodic rate review) as an item that Council will appreciate. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE THE FUND BALANCE/NET ASSETS POLICY AS PRESENTED. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 12: APPROVE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY City Administrator Zuleger explained the policy and the reasoning for establishing it. Having a policy in place is important during accelerated periods of growth, as it prevents the City from over- extending itself. Mr. Zuleger highlighted the 12 policy statements emphasizing that several of the policies will have a beneficial impact on City's bond rating. The City will maintain a Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). It will be need based, not wants based; 2. The City will restrict long-term borrowing to planned capital improvements, as included in the CIP, and a limited use of short-term debt for capital outlay and acquisition. On all projects, at least 50% of the principal will be retired within 10 years; 3. The City will not use long-term debt for current operations; 4. The City will strive to maintain a "pay-as-you-go" capital funding policy, supporting capital spending without use of debt whenever feasible; 5. The City recognizes that for certain projects that the use of debt may be of overall financial benefit to the City and that all projects should be evaluated to determine whether debt financing is the appropriate choice at the time of authorization; Page 4 of 7 1. LAKE ELMK0CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6, The City will pay back debt within o period not to exceed the expected useful life of the projects, typically atorbelow 20ycars; 7. Direct net debt not to exceed 3% of total market value of taxable property in the City; 8. The City will manage debt issuance plans and structuring of debt service to strive to maintain a total debt service levy that is less than Z596the City'x total combined certified property tax levies; 9. The City will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies regarding its financial condition, including full disclosure inevery report; lO. When feasible the City will use refunding mechanisms to reduce interest cost; 11. During the annual budget process, a debt study will be prepared in conjunction with the CIP toprovide information about the City'nplanned debt structuring; 12. Refunding and advance refunding savings opportunities will bemonitored, and action will betaken when determined tohcfinancially advantageous. Prepayment of debt was explained. Council Member Nelson asked about total current dchL K4c %ulegerotated it is currently under 15%= 14.3'4. Street/sewer/water (enterprise) debt does not impact property tax levy. The target n[Z59h was discussed, Mc %u\rgcr explained that 259b was industry standard. It was explained that bond raters like to see no more than 25%. Recoverable charges were discussed. Alternative Urbau&,cawidc Kcvicvv (\DAR) will require us to posy an ordinance. There will be an amount n[AUAR that will not be recovered. Council K4eozbcr Srudb stated that the council may have been under the impression that the /\U&Rwas going to be 100% recoverable. Mr. Griffin said the original design of the forcemain might be part of $lcnU\ioo figure Council remembers. Mayor Pearson asked about the practice of saving and taxing for future benefits that may not he realized. Mr. 7u|cCersaid ittypically isnot ocommon practice. GFO&Industry moved from sinking fund to$25,OOOthreshold and lO'ycaruseful life. MOTION: Council Member J/ndh moved TO APPROVE THE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AS PRESENTED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4'0. ITEM 13:ADOPT 1'94 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Planning Director K]att explained this was a request for Council to formally adopt the 1'94 comp plan. Mr. Klatt explained the history of the development of the comp plan, The Metropolitan Council had very positive reaction. The Met Council agreed tnamend the Memorandum of Understanding. /\n)codnoeot will provide an additional 5 years for planning and build -out. New target date is 2015 with penalties beginning in 20I6. Amendment also gave Mot Council Regional Administrator authority to negotiate with city. Mr. Klatt noted that the Village Plan will be coming back to Council soon for formal adoption as well. In order to not cause any confusion, the other portions were not included. Mr. Klatt outlined the next steps will roa|o}y involve changes tozVuio�ouap, including several holding zones. These are Page Sof7 LAKE ELMA0CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ������ ���� ^�r~~~--~^~~~~~ sites that are planned to receive city services, and therefore no development will be allowed uudD those services are provided. Council K4anlbor Smith inquired about the number n[uo'scwered households. She is concerned about overshooting 24,000 target. Mr. Zuleger noted that the City plans on reducing the number Lo 30'000 and extending the target date to 2040. As soon asthe Village Plan is approved by Met Council, those types o[negotiations are planned tobcstarted. Council Member Smith asked to be part o[those negotiations. Mayor Pearson said bcwould insist she beincluded. Council K8co`bcr Nelson asked about 100' bufher. It was noted that itis in conflict with the Village Plan that was recently adopted. KYc K]attexplained that this isspecifically for l'g4and when the Village Plan isbrought back, those types ofchanges should hemade. Amending the proposed plan to allow manufacturing was discussed. C000d| Member Nelson expressed his desire for the addition of heavy manufacturing in order to be flexible. Mr. Klatt said that the issue can be addressed at v later point through zoning regulations to a|\ovv this in the future if desired. The Conditional Use classification was also discussed. It was noted that certain heavy manufacturing uses often poses potential nuisance issues, such as heat, glare, odor, noise, etc. Council Member Smith stated she recalls that the number of jobs was considered when manufacturing was discussed, i.e. businesses involving large machinery versus high number of workers. This may have tochange with the advancement uftechnology. Council Member Nelson reiterated his desire to be friendly to businesses and not be overly restrictive without knowing what the next manufacturing development may include. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2013-025, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAKE ELMO 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Seconded by Council Member Bloyer. MOTION PASSED 4-0. SUMMARY REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member B0wyerreported stopping and speak to neighbors phone calls with residents. Wants the community to remember to be grateful for living in Lake Elmo. He hopes that future discussions are positive, Mayor Pearson reported onerhog with Mr. Griffin, Mr. Zu)eger, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. K[att to discuss obtaining funding for the crosswalk on Highway 5, Council Member Smith - Lake Elmo Days committee has begun meeting to plan event. Scheduled VVbeclbnosc for Saturday; Ken VVaoovicbwiD beplaying during the day. Event will include Battle of the Bands. September 6 & 7m. &|vvayn looking for volunteers. Explained the membership of the group; Commended Clerk Bell on the minutes ' best minutes in D years. They were dcor and concise; Also gave kudos to'4k/ssaMcLeod for newsletter. Best newsletter she ever seen. Thanked staff for hard work. Page 6 of 7 LAKE EDM0>CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02"2013 Council Member Nelson _ooreport. City Administrator Zulegar gave overview of revised workshop schedule and subject matter; delivering Minnesota Investment Fund grant to MN -DEED on Valley Cartage den[ Met with Rep. McCollum staff on ground water issues; Two properties are going to prosecution. Going tobetaking a drainage tour with Planner Johnson; Working on lake issues and park issues; Working with MN Land Trust regarding Conservation Easement for Sunfish Lake Park and management plans; Park survey sub -committee ismeeting. Council Member B|nycrexpressed his opinion that electors had differing expectations of park use. Would like legal counsel to look at eminent domain as possible way to get land back. Council Member Smith noted the bard work done on preserving the laud. She gave examples of opposing the placement of a water tower and public works building. However, she still wants the park used. She did want some active use in Area Two, and if Conservation Easement prohibits that, Lbeu it is in violation of what council intended at the time. She stated that there was supposed to be 5 acres set aside to include a skating rink, etc. It was always the intent to have the five acres used for active - would like apavilion and picnic area. Not ever meant for area tonot bc used orclosed off. Wants tosee more people use the park. The acquisition of the land and the adoption of the easement and what options are available to alter or modify the usage was discussed. It was pointed out that amending the easement or developing a nnauaOcnncnt plan were available remedies. Private and public conservation easements iothe City were discussed. City Attorney Brekken reported working on property clean op action; stated he would pass on Council Member Bloyer's comments regarding Sunfish Lake Park to City Attorney Snyder. Planning Director &{lmtt reported upcoming \/i|(agc planning vvncksbnp involving parking standards. Planning comm. looked atVillage mixed use ordinance. Preliminary plat expected soon; 0n4/13atq/\K4planning vvebivar. City Engineer Griffin reported state Highway S funding program from K4oDO7. This is a tight deadline, but trying tomake the deadline. school crosswalk. Finance Director Bendel Nareport, City Clerk Bell reported that "good meetings make good minutes"; attended annual municipal clerk conference in 3t. Cloud; conducting research on park and lake use issues; working on a liquor license transfer; noted that there was another high school student inattendance tooi�bt, Meeting adjourned at85OP.M. ATTEST: Adam R. Bell, City Clerk Page 7 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor K E Ar,eracomivm • MO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 3 MOTION Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the Amount of $149,458.18 SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $149,458.18. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operation. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # Amount Description ACH $ 9,227.87 Payroll Taxes to IRS & MN Dept of Revenue 4/4/13 ACH $ 5,550.70 Payroll Retirement to PERA 4/4/13 DD4530— DD4550 $ 26,653.73 Payroll Dated 4/4/13 (Direct Deposits) 1930-1945 $ 960.00 Library Card Reimbursements 4/16/13 39769-39816 $ 107,065.88 Accounts Payable 4/16/13 TOTAL $ 149,458.18 STAFF REPORT: City staff has complied and reviewed the attached set of claims. All appears to be in order and consistent with City budgetary and fiscal policies and Council direction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda proposed disbursements in the amount of S149,458.18. Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda or a particular claim from this item and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the April 16, 2013, Disbursements as Presented land modified/ herein." ATTACHMENTS: Accounts Payable Dated 4/16/13 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS at- removed from the Consent Auendal: Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ......... ...... ....... ....... ........... ..... ..... Mayor & City Council Discussion ............ ........... ...................... .......... ....... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ....... ...... ............. ...... . ........ ............. ...... ........ Mayor Facilitates 2 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: devise Printed: 04/11/2013 - 11:38 AM Batch: (103-04-2013 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # ADVANCED Advanced Eng & Environ Svs Inc 33751 04/10/2013 306.00 0,00 04/16/2013 Water system Design Phasing Study No 0000 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services AE2S 33751 Total: 306.00 33752 04/10/2013 423.57 0.00 04/16/2013 Production Well No4 AE2S Task No 0000 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services Order #2 33752 Total: 423.52 ADVANCED Total: 729.52 ALEXANDE Alexander Farrah STORMWATER20114/10/2013 601-000-0000-37100 Water Sales STORMWATER2012 'Iota]: ALEXANDE Total: 55.00 0.00 04/16/2013 SW Assessment rec'd atler cut off No 0000 adjust 55.00 55.00 ALLEGRA Allegra 48067 4/10/2013 146.61 0.00 04/16/2013 4 Part Adininistraive Citiations No 0000 101-42(1-240(1-42030 Printed Forms 48067 Total: 146.61 ALLEGRA Total: 146.61 AMDAHL Amdahl Chris 9655 04/1(1/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 9655 Total: .AMDA111, Total: 109.65 0.00 04/16/2013 Rekcv Public Entrance, Station 41 No 0000 109.65 109.65 ARAM Aramark. Inc. 629-7704689 04/10/2013 25.54 0.00 04/16/2013 Uniforms- Invoice Date 3/14/13 No 0000 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-77(14689 lotal: 25.54 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) Page 1 Invoice # Inv Date 629-7714367 04/1(1/2(113 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7714367 Total: 629-77 [6193 04/10/20 13 I 01-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Matt Contractual Bldg 629-7716193 Total: 629-7716194 04/10/2013 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Mitint Contractual Bldg 629-7716194 Total: 629-7719197 04/10/2013 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7719197 Total: ARAM Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 25.54 0„00 04/16/2013 Uniforms Invoice Dated 3/28/2013 No 0000 25.54 51.83 0,00 04/16/2013 Linen City Hall No 0000 51,83 42.99 0.00 04/16/2013 Monthly Rug Service -Annex No 0000 42.99 /5.54 0.00 04/16/2013 Uniforms En voice dated 414/2013 No 0000 95.54 171,44 BATTY PE 13atteries Plus Woodbury. Corp 032-772897 04/10/2013 7.56 0.00 04/16/2013 Shop 13atteries No 0000 101-430-3100-42150 Shop Materials 032-772897 04/10/2013 64.62 0.00 04/16/2013 Trailer Brake Batteries No 0000 101-430-3100-42150 Shop Materials 032-772897 Total: 72.18 BATTY P L Total: 72.18 BENDEL Bendel Cathv 2012-HAS 04/10/2013 700„00 0.00 04/16/2013 2012 Reimbursement HSA No 0000 101-000-0000-21710 Ilealth 1 ISA 2012-HAS Total: 700.00 BENDEL Total: 700,00 BERTELSO 13ertelson's CP-WO-838018-1 04/10/2013 -1.38 0.00 04/16/2013 Return credit No 0000 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies CP-WO-838018-1 Total: -1.38 WO-845308-1 04/10/2013 77,48 0.00 04/16/2013 Planning No 0000 1(11-410-1910-42000 Office Supplies WO-845308-1 77.48 BERTEESO Total: 76.10 BUELOW Buelow Excavating 6714 04/10/2013 101-430-3125-43150 Contract Services 6714 Total: AP - To Ile Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 1.163.75 0.00 04/1612013 Corn ract Snow Plowing 3/5 & 3/14 L163.75 No 0000 Page 2 invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLinc # BUELOW Total: 1.163.75 C A C Companion Animal Control, I_L,C 4 04/10/2013 500.00 0,00 04/16/2013 Animal Control Services- March 101-420-2700-43150 Contract Services 4 04/10/2013 210.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Dog Pick Up / Impoundment 101-420-2700-43160 Impounding 4 Total: C A C Total: 710,00 710.00 (/ARDMEMB Carctmenther Service 03192013-VISA 04/10/2013 270.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Conference Regis vet/cast 21st Century 101-410-1910-44330 Ducs & Subscriptions PL 03192013-VISA Total: 270.00 03212013VISA 04/10/2013 5,00 0.00 04/16/2013 Parkine 2/26 I) Zuleger - :Viet Council 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 03212013VISA 04/10./2013 52.01 0.00 04/16/2013 Misc Meals 3/8 & 3/10 D ZuIcecr 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 03212013VISA 04110/2013 26.07 0,00 04/16/2013 Office Supplies - Target Car Charger- 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies Zul 03212013V1SA 04/10./2013 410.00 0.00 04/16/2013 2013 MN Municipal Clerks Mbrship 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 03212013VISA 04/1072013 25.99 0,00 04/16/2013 Wall Street Journal Subscrip 3 Months 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 032120 I3VISA 04/10/2013 180.00 0.00 04/1612013 CTC Program to mail out. Newsletter 101-410-1450-43090 Newsletter 03212013VISA 04/10/2013 249.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Alliance Innovation-Cust Scry Local 101-410-1450-44370 Conferences & Training_ Govt 03212013VISA Total: 948.07 165104-VISA 04/10/2013 60.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Lodging Ripley 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & Training 165104-VISA Total: 60.00 1868132135-V1SA 04/1012013 110.00 0.00 04116/2013 Shade Tree Short course Bodlovick 101-450-5200-44300 Miscellaneous 1868132135-VISA Total: I 10.00 2198-VISA 04/10/2013 21,00 0,00 04/16/2013 Repair Boot. Boot Polish 101-420-2220-44170 Uniforms 2198-VISA Total: 21.00 CARDMEIVII3 Total: 1.409.07 CARQUEST Car Quest Auto Parts 2055-284792 04/10/2013 101-430-3120-42210 Equipment Parts AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM / 36.05 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt Roller Filters No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 3 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 2055-284792 Total: 36.05 2055-284939 04/10/2013 11.41 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt Roller Filters I ()I-430-3120-42210 Equipment Parts 2055-284939 04/10/2013 62.76 0.00 (14/16/2013 Roller Oil 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel. Oil and Fluids 2055-284939 Total: 74.1 7 6971-345635 04110/2013 10.09 0.00 04/1612013 Idler Pulley 00-2 101-430-3100-44010 Repairs/IN/hint Bldg 6971-345635 04/10/2013 28.63 (1.00 04/16/2013 Antifreeze Trans fluid 101-430-3100-4212(1 Fuel., Oil and Fluids 6971-345635 Total: 38.72 CARQUE ST Total: 148.94 CENCOLLE Century College 499327 04/10/2013 635.00 0.00 0446/2013 Fire Officer 1 x 2 Cornell, Witter 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & 'Fraininc 499327 Total: 635.00 CENCOLLE Total: 635.00 COMCAST Comcast 03272013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44300 Miscellaneous 03272013 Total: COMCAST Total: CTYBLOOM City of Bloomington MARCH 2013 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-42270 Utility: System Maintenance MARCH 2013 Total: CTYBLOOM Total; CTYROSEV City of Roseville 217315 04/1(1/2013 101-410-1450-43 I 80 Information Tee mology/Web 217315 Total: CrYROSEV Total: DELAPP DeLapp Steve 03312013 04/10/2013 706-450-5300-42230 Building Repair Supplies 03312013 Total: AP - To 13e Paid Proof 1 .is t (04/11/13 - 11;38 AM) 7.92 0.00 04/1612013 Monthly Service - Fire Department 7,92 7,92 31.50 0.00 04/16/2013 Lab Bacteria Test 31,50 31.50 3.776.26 (1.00 04/16/2013 Monthly IT Services Billing April 2013 3.776.26 3.776,26 80.99 80.99 0.00 04/16/2(113 Reimb Building Rehah & Repair Supplies - No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 4 Invoice # In Date Amount Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # DE L„APP Total: 80.99 EJ-N4BR0C Brockway Matthew PR1k1ARY - 12 04/10/2013 I 00,00 0,00 04116/2013 Election Judge 2012 Priman: No 0000 101-410-1410-43150 Contract Services PRIMARY - 12 Total: 100.00 EJ-NIFIROC 'Fowl: 100.00 EMBROIDM Embroirtme of Roseville E 20660 04/1012013 45.48 0.00 04/16/2013 Adinin-Beckie's Shirt. No 0000 101-410-1320-44300 kliscellaneous E 20660 04/10/2013 45.48 0.00 04/16/2013 Finance - Mike G Shirt No 0000 101-410-1520-44300 Miscellaneous E 20660 Total: 90.96 EMBROI DM Total: 90,96 EMERGA UT Emergency Automotive tech. Inc 21598 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 21598 Total: ERGAUT Total: ENVENTIS Enventis 738507 04012013 04/10/2013 101-410-1940-432 I 0 Telephone 738507 04012013 Total: ENVENTIS Total: 148.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Repair Emergency Lights on (NI No 0000 148.00 148,00 53.89 0.00 04/16/2013 Telephone/Data Sc 'ice City hall April - 53.89 53.89 No 0000 rocus Focus Engineering. Inc. 543 & 545 04110/2013 3.722,29 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering No 0000 101-410-1930-43030 Engineering Services 543 t(t. 545 04/1012013 1.801.00 0.00 04116/2013 General Engineering No 0000 101-41(1-1910-43030 Engineering Services 54.3 & 545 Total: 5„513.29 545 04110/2013 943.50 0.00 04/1612013 General Engineering VR A No 0000 101-420-2400-43030 Engineering 545 04/1012013 2,199.38 0.00 0411612013 General Engineering V RA No 0000 101-410-1910-43030 Engineering Services 545 04110/2013 787,50 0,00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA No 0000 101-430-3100-43030 Engineering Services AP - T0 Be Paid Proof List (04111.'13 - 11:38 AM) Page 5 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 545 04710/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 545 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering. Services 545 04/10/2013 603-496-9500-43030 Engineering Services 545 Total; 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/1012013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 Total: 547 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 547 Total; 548 04/10/2013 413-480-8(10(1-43030 Engineering Services 548 Total; 549 04/10/2013 420-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 549 Total: 550 04/10/2013 419-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 550 Total: 551 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 551 Total: 552 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 552 Total: 553 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 14(),5() 475,00 2,527.00 7,072.88 1,186.77 360,00 1.036,00 2,765.45 531.00 29,50 442,50 1,566.50 7,917,72 135,00 135,00 135.00 135,00 177.00 177.00 74.28 74.28 1,285,00 1.285,00 59.00 59,00 2.187,20 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0,00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0.00 04/16/2013 Transportation & Traffic Systems 0.00 04/16/2013 Street Maintenance 0.00 04/16/2013 0.00 04/16/2013 OM 04/16/2013 0.00 04/16/2013 Capital Improvement Planning 2013 Seal Coat Project Trunk Highway 36 Corridor Planning VINDot Hilton Trail Interchange 0.00 04/16/2013 State Hwy5 Traffic Muni Safety Improve 0.00 (14/16/2013 Municipal Aid System 0,00 04/16/2013 Sanctuary 0.00 04/16/2013 Lake Elmo Area Village Eng. Support 0,00 (14/16/2013 10th Street Infrastructure Planning 0,00 04/16/2013 Demontreville Highlands Area Street Impr 0.00 04/16/2013 Olson lake frail Sewer Extenion Feasi hi I 0,00 0.4/16/2013 1n ()oil Ave Trunk Waterman 0,00 04/16/2013 Keats Ave Watermain 43?-1) No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 (1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 MOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 6 Invoice # Inv Date AMOUllt Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 553 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 553 *Total: 554 04/10/2013 203-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 554 Total: 555 04/1012013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 555 Tomli 556 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 556 Total: 557 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 557 Total: 558 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 558 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering Services 558 Total: FOCUS Total: GIBSON,' U Gibson Judy 03292013 04110/2013 206-450-5300-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 03292013 Total: GIBSON,141 Total: JOHNSON& Johnson & Turner Attorneys 28019 04/10/2013 101-420-2150-43045 Attorney Criminal 28019 Total: 78075 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43040 Legal Services 28025 Total: 28398 28402 04/10/2013 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 28398 28402 Total: 28399 04/10/2013 I 01-410-1320-43(140 Legal Services 28399 Total: JOHNSON& Total: AP - To Lic Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 2.899.30 5,086,50 5.307.00 5.307.00 6,456.36 6,456.36 883.50 883,50 842.50 842.50 380.20 570.30 950,50 41.9(15.53 132,00 132.00 132.00 4.239.50 4.239,50 72.50 72.50 3.464,50 $.464.50 2.442.00 2.442.00 10.218,50 0.00 04/16/2013 Keats Ave Street 57% 0.00 04/16/2013 Lennar 1-94 West Corridor 0,00 04/16/2013 LE Ave Infrastructure 194 to 30th Street 0,00 04/16/2013 Water System funding. activities Deeds) 0,00 04/16/2013 Production Well Number 4 0,00 04116/2013 Section 34 Water 40% 0,00 04/16/2013 Section 34 Sewer Extension 60(4/0 0.00 04116/2013 Pioneer Press Newspaper Subscription 0.00 04/16/2013 Legal Services Prosecution 0,00 04/16/2013 Legal Services 31\4 0.00 04/1612013 Legal services - Civil 0,00 04/16/2013 Legal Services Detachment Petition No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 7 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # JOHNSONI3 Johnson Brian 04062013 04/1012013 101-420-2220-44040 Rcpairs/Maint Eqpt 040620 13 Total: JOHNSON B Total: LLCM. Lake Elmo oil, Inc. 03312013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-12120 Fuel. Oil and Fluids 03312013 Total: 288888 04110/2013 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 288888 Total: LE011, Total: 67.69 0.00 04/16/2013 Reimbursement Vehicle Cleaning No 0000 Supplies 67.69 67.69 190.50 0,00 04/1612013 Fuel 190.50 60.00 60,00 250.50 0.00 04/16/2013 Fuel No No 0000 0000 Lillie NoNspapers Inc. Lillie Suburban 03292013 04/10/2013 47.30 0.00 04/16/2013 3/6 Notice - Olson Lake Trail No 0000 101-410-1450-43510 Public Notices 03292013 04/10/2013 103.20 0.00 0411612013 3120 Notice - Keats Avenue No 0000 101-110-1450-43510 Public Notices 03292013 04/10/2013 70.40 0.00 04/16/2013 3/20 Ordinance 408-071 No 0000 I 01-110-1320-43510 Legal Publishing 03292013 04/1012013 112.20 0.00 04116/2013 3/20 Ordinance 008-072 No 0000 101-410-1320-43510 Legal Publishing 03292013 04/10/2013 26.40 0,00 04716/2013 3/27 Notice - Planning Commission No 0000 101-410-1450-43510 Public Notices 03292013 Total: 359.50 LiHie lijlal: 359.50 I.OFF Loftier Companies. Inc. 1548046 04/10/2013 511.63 0.00 04/16/2013 Copy Machines Overage & Base 3110- No 0000 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt 4/9 1548(146 Total: 511.63 LOH Total: 511,63 MAW() MAHCO APRIL 12 2013 04/10/2013 101-420-2400-44370 Conferences & Training APRIL 12 2013 Total: MAI1C0 rota': AP - -ft) Be Paid Proof List 0.14111/13 - 11:38 AM) 95.00 0.00 0411612013 MAI1CO Spring Training 4/12 No 0000 Ilazardous 95.00 95.00 Page 8 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # MARONEYS Maroney's Sanitation. Inc 473549 04/10/2013 108.32 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -City Hall 101-410-1940-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 47.68 0,00 04/1612013 Waste Removal -fire 101-420-2220-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 207,82 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -Public Works 101-430-3100-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 207.82 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal-Par1s 101-450-5200-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 48.12 0,00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -Library 206-450-5300-43840 Refuse 473549 Total: 619.76 MARONEYS Toial: 619.76 METCOU Metropolitan Council 1013787 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43820 Sewer Utility - Met Council 1013787 Total: METCOU Total: No MOO No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 1.484.55 0,00 04/16/2013 Monthly Wastewater Service - May No 0000 1,484.55 1,484.55 MURRYREN Murray Renee 03312013 04/10/2013 169.94 0.00 04/16/2013 Books for Collection No 0000 206-450-5300-42500 Library Collection Maintenance 03312013 Total: 169,94 MI.IRRYREN Total: 169.94 NCPERS 566200-NCPERS Minnesota 5662413 04/10./2013 112.00 0.00 04/16/2013 April 2013 Deductions No 0000 101-000-0000-21708 Other Benefits 5662413 Total: 112.00 NCPERS Total: 112.00 NORTHT00 Blue Tarp Financial 563059231 04/10/2013 451.99 0.00 04/16/2013 Pump Discharge Hoses No 0000 603-496-9500-42400 Small Tools 8.: Minor Equipment 563059231 Total: 451.99 NoRTivroo Total: 451.99 ON [CALL Gopher State One Call 60413 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-43150 Contract Services 100.00 0.00 04/1612013 Annuel Fee- Lines Locate No 0000 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04111113 - 11:38 AM) Page 9 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 60413 Total: 100.00 65874 04/10/2013 59.55 0,00 04/16/2013 FTP Tickets & Voice 101-430-3100-43 150 Contract Services 65874 Total: 59.55 ONECe-11,I. Total: 159.55 No 0000 PIKEB013 Pike Bob 04012013 04/10/2013 46.41 0.00 04/16/2013 Paint supplies No 0000 706-450-5300-42230 Building Repair Supplies 04012013 04/10/2013 11.75 0,00 04/16/2013 Key made fOr piano No 0000 206-450-5300-42230 Building. Repair Supplies 04012013 Total; 58,16 PIKEBOB Total: 58.16 PINKY Pinky's Sewer Service, Inc. 65569 04/10/2013 100,00 0.00 04/16/2013 Pumped 2 Septic Tanks No 0000 206-450-5300-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 65569 Total; 100,00 PINKY Total: 100.00 PITNEY Pitney Bowes 438240 04/10/2013 721.33 0.00 04/16/2013 Postage Rental & refills 2/15112/31/12 No 0000 101-410-1320-43220 Postage 438240 Total; 221.33 PITNEY Total: 771.33 REEDKATR Reed Katrina 04162013 04110/2013 101-000-0000-21710 I lealth 1-ISA 04162013 Total; REEDKATR Total: VRCOOP Ri‘ er Country Cooperative 03312(113 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 03312013 Total; RIVRCOOP Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List t04/1 I /13 - 11:38 AM) 96.00 0.00 04116/2013 BSA Day Care Re iinbursement No 0000 96.00 96.00 529,12 0.00 04/16/2013 Fuel 529,12 529.12 No 0000 Page 10 Invoice 14 Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # SCHWAAB Schwaab. Inc. C828I9 04110/2013 79.25 0.00 04/16/2013 2 Self -Inking Signature Stamps 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies C82819 Total: 79.25 C84573 04/10/2013 75.07 0.00 04/16/2013 Pre -Inked Notary Stamp & 2 Record 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies Bks C84573 Total: 75,07 SCI1WAAB Total: 154,32 SW/WC SW/WC Service Cooperatives 03/25/2013 04/1012013 24.759.00 0.00 04/16/2013 May 2013 Insurance Premiums 101-000-0000-21706 Medical Insurance 03/25/2013 Total: 24.759.00 SW/WC Total: 24,759,00 TASCH T.A. Schirsky & Sons Inc 54636 04/10/2013 230,85 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 54636 Total: 230.85 TASCTI Total: 230.85 TOWNCTRY Town & Country Cleaning Co 413 630 04/10/2013 245.81 0.00 04/16/2013 April Janitorial Services 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Main( Contractual 1310g 413 630 Foal: 245,81 413 671 04/10/2013 187,47 0.00 04116/2013 April Janitorial Service - Library 206-450-5300-44010 Repairs/Mahn 13Idg 413 671 Total: 187.47 TOWNCTRY Total: 433.28 VANGADOR Van g Adora Cable Operator 04/1012013 55.00 0.00 04116;2013 Cable Operations - 4/2/13 CC Meeting 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 4hr Cable Operator Total: 55,00 Cable Operator] 04/10/2013 55.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Cable Operations-4/8/13 PC Meeting 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 4hrs Cable Operator 1 Total: 55,00 VANGADOR Total: 110.00 AP - Be Paid Proof List (04/11;13 - 1138 AM) No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No ONO No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 11 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine wiTTER Witter Nicholas 04022013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & Training 04022013 Total: WITTER Total: XCEL Xcel Energy 51-0117417-0 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-0117417-0 Total: 51-0630620-5 04/10/2013 206-450-5300-43810 Electric Utility 51-0630620-5 Total: 51-4504807-7 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 04/1012013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4504807-7 -Total: 51-4572945-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4572945-7 Total: 51-4576456-3 04/10/2013 I 01-420-2220-43810 Electric Utility 51-4576456-3 Total: 51-4580376-5 04110/2013 101-410-1940-43810 Electric Utility 51-4580376-5 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4580376-5 04/10/2013 101-410-1940-43810 Electric Utility 51-4580376-5 Total: 51-4733556-8 04/10/20 I 3 101-450-52(1(1-43810 Electric Utility 51-4733556-8 Total: 51-5044219-0 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-50442 I 9-0 Fotal: 51-5275289-3 04/10/2013 1(11-450-520(1-43810 Electric 1i6Iiiy 51-5275289-3 Total: 51-5356323-8 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility AP - To Be Paid Proof list (04/1 3 - 1138 AM) taMMINNI 49.72 0.00 04/16/2013 Mileage Reimbursement Officer No 0000 Training 49.72 49.72 26.09 0.00 04/16/20 I 3 425 Keats - Welcome Sign No 0000 26,09 569,04 0,00 04/16/2013 3537 Lake Elmo Ave - Library No 0000 569.04 78.41 0.00 04/16/2013 3509 Laverne Lights at Legion Pk No 0000 84,36 0,00 04/16/2013 8860 Hudson lift station No 0000 32,80 0,00 04/16/2013 I 00 Inwood Traffic Lights No 0000 195.57 31,46 0,00 04/16/2013 3014 Jamley Street 1,ights No 0000 31.46 1,095.49 0.00 04./16/2013 4259 Laverne Fire Station #2 No 0000 1.095,49 215.62 0.00 04/16/2013 3800 Laverne - City Hall No 0000 29.83 0,00 04/16/2013 100 Keats - Frank Lights No 0000 540.44 0.00 04/16/2013 3800 Laverne - City Hall No 0000 785.89 11.19 0.00 04/1612013 3510 Laverne - 1 ennis Court No 0000 11.19 757,28 0.00 04/16/2013 11 194 Upper 33rd - Parks 1:31dg No 0000 257.28 21.24 0,00 04116/2013 8170 Lake Jane Trail - Pebble Park No 0000 21,24 1,616,50 0.00 1)4/16/201.3 3303 Langly & 11975 550h Wells 1 & No 0000 Page 12 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine 51-5356323-8 Total: 51-5577337-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-5522332-2 Total: 51-5747685-4 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-5747685-4 Total: 51-5916043-7 04110/2013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-5916043-7 Total: 51-6429583-8 04/1012013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-6429583-8 Total: 51-6433976-2 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-43810 FLectric Utility 51-6433976-2 Total: 5 L-6625457-1 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-6625457-1 Total: 51-6736544-2 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-6736544-2 'Iota!: 51-6928283-3 04110/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-6928283-3 Total: 51-6956201-4 04/1012013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-6956201-4 Total: 51-7538112-1 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-43810 Electric Utilitv 51,7538112-1 Total: 51-8126093-5 04/1012013 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility 51-8126093-5 Total: 51-8711719-3 04110/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-8711719-3 Total: XCE/1. Total: YALEMECH Yale Mechanical 155742 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-44010 RepairslYlaint 13Idg 135742 Total: 1.616.50 42.74 0.00 04/1612013 998 Inwood - Traffic Lights 288.04 0.00 04/1612013 3585 Laverne - Arts Center 19,87 0.00 04/16/2013 11062 34t0 Street - Lilt Station 17.25 OW 04116/2013 2759 Legion Ave - Lift Station 509.11 0.00 04116/2013 3510 Laverne Fire Station /1 217,97 0.00 04/16/2013 3511 Laverne- Legion Park 2.119.87 0.00 04/16/2013 Street Lights 42,74 288.04 19,87 17.25 509.11 217.97 2,119.87 28.23 0.00 04/16/2013 11915 Stillwater Blvd- IVIanning&Sti I lwate 28.23 45.51 0.00 04116/2013 3675 Layton VFW 13allfield Lts 2,552.23 0,00 04/16/2013 3400 Ideal Public Works 195.89 0.00 04/16/2013 3445 [deal Ave Water Tower 2 45.51 7,557,73 195,89 12.33 0.00 04/16/2013 10901 Stillwater Blvd Speed Sign 1-1wy5 12.33 10,658.79 1.005.03 0.00 04/16/201.3 Winter Contract Maim Serv-Public Wks 1,005.03 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 AP - To Be Paid Proof I Lst (04111113 - 11:38 AM) Page 1 3 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close l'OLine # 135743 04/10/2013 439.50 0400 04/16/2013 Winter Contract !quint Serv-Fire Sta 4.2 No 0000 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Ivlaint 131(1g 135743 Total: 439.50 135744A 04./10/2013 469.25 0.00 04/16/2013 Winter Contract Maint Serv-Fire Sta 41 - No 0000 101-420-2220-44010 kepairs/Maint Bldg I35744A Total: 469.25 135745 135800 04/10/2013 550.36 0.00 04/16/2013 Winter Contract klaint Ser\—Cityl lall No 0000 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual 13Idg Anne 135745 135800 Total: 550.36 135792 04110/2013 246,25 0.00 04/16/2013 Winter Contract Maint Serv-Parks 13Idg No 0000 101-450-5200-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 135792 Total: 746.25 Y Al. FM BCH Total: 2.710.39 Report Total: 107.065.88 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11113 - 11:38 AM) Page 14 Ti tF C;11'Y (")1-7. AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION March 2013 Financial Reporting Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION 04/16/2013 4 SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, The City Council is asked to accept the March 2013 Financial Reporting Packet. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operations and report the financial (unaudited) statement to the City Council. City guidelines suggest the Council be updated on a regular basis. STAFF REPORT: Attached please find a report for March reflecting the monthly detail supporting the year to date actual results and comparing those results to the 2013 Budget. As of the end of the first quarter, the actual results are within 1°/0 of budg t. The most significant variances are highlighted below: Revenues: Building Permit revenue for the month exceeded budget by 27% and for the year by 62%. As mentioned in previous months, the growth trend has continued even during the winter and 8 new homes have been applied for to date in 2013 compared to 3 homes at this same time in both 2012 and 2011. Plan review fees continue to be strong as a result of the increased housing activity and are 48% above budget for the month and 63% above budget year to date. Expenses: Most departments are below budget for the month as all Departments continue to be very cost conscious. A few key items to note: Workers Compensation expense hit in March but was not budgeted until later in the year. These numbers will be seen in each department based on the historical work comp rating for each job classification. The dues and subscription expense reflected for the Mayor & Council represents the annual cost for memberships in the League of Minnesota Cities ($6,958) and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities ($3,381). The memberships were budgeted later in the year based on when they were paid in 2012. We were able to publish the newsletter earlier than anticipated so the expense hit in February rather than March when it was budgeted in the Communications Department budget. Due to coordinating initial audit fieldwork earlier than last year, the initial interim billing expense for audit hit earlier than budgeted for 2013 in the Finance Department budget. The annual accounting software maintenance expense (Springbrook) was paid for in January but was budgeted for in March based on when it was paid in 2012. The Planning Department has incurred expenses above the amounts budgeted for Engineering and Contract Services. All excess expenses were approved by City Council (The Theming project with Damon Farber). As mentioned last month, the small tools and equipment account for the Fire Department includes $9,048 which was 100% reimbursed by WA County grant monies in March (for the purchase of laptop equipment for the fire vehicles). The Building repairs and maintenance expense is over budget to date in the Fire Department due to needing to replace two heaters in Firehouse #1 which were a safety risk. As expected as a result of the extended winter, the sand/salt and repairs and maintenance to equipment costs are above budget. Although these costs are not controllable, the Public works department did an excellent job of coordinating resources to minimize overtime. Please note that the salary expenses are based on more accurate departmental allocations than we had back in Aimust when the budget was initially compiled. As a result, some departments are above budget, while others are under but overall, personnel expenses are below budget. 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive the March monthly Financial Reporting Packet as part of tonio-ht's Consent Agenda. Alternately, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda and further discuss and review. ATTACHMENTS: . March Financial Reports Citv of Lake Elmo 2013 By Month Budget to Actual Comparative As of March 31, 2013 101-General Fund Detail By Department 416/2013 MONTH y-rD DEPT 410 - GEN'L C;ON'T BUDGET ACTUAL Variance ($) Variance (%) BUDGET ACTUAL Variance ($) Variance (%) Month Month Month Month YTD YTD YTD YTD REVENUE Current Ad Valorem TEIXCS 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0,00 (1.00 (LOW), Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Mobile Home Tax 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,110% Fiscal Disparities 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% Penaliy & Interest on Taxes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00'!4, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00'Yr, Liquor License 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00'V° 0.00 500,00 500.00 0.00% Wastchauler License 0.00 0.00 0,00 (1,0(M 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% General Contractor License 0.00 I 65.00 I 65,00 0,00% 0.00 165.00 165.00 (IMO% Ileating Contractor License 22(1.00 710.00 490.00 272.73% 1,785.00 2,400.00 61 5.00 34.45% Blacktopping Contractor License 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Building Permits 10,000.00 12,767,30 2,767,30 27,67% 22,000.00 35,639.60 13,639.60 62.00% tleating Permits 1,200.00 1,045.00 (155.00) -12.92'!,), 3.600.00 3,265.00 (335.00) -9.31% Plumbing Permits 300,00 805.00 505.00 168,33% 1,100.00 3,265.00 2,165.00 196.82% Sewer Permits 0.00 185.00 185.00 0.00% 0.00 365.00 365,00 0.00% Animal License 180.00 140.00 (40.00) -72.77°,)) 1,140.00 1,120.00 (20,00) -1.75% Utility Permits 600.00 0,00 (600.00) -10(1.00% 1,800.00 798,00 ((,002,00) -55.67/0 Burning Permit 100.00 180,00 80.00 80.0096 400.00 565.00 165,00 41.25% Homestead Credit Aid 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0,011 0,00 0.00°.ii MSA-Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00`).4, 49,011.00 49,011,00 0,00 0.0096 State Fire Aid 1,500.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1011.00°,4, 1,500.00 3,00(1.00 1,500.00 100.00% PERA Aid 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00'1'n 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0096 Gravel Tax 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0(196 688.03 0.00 (688.63) -100.00% Iteeycling Grant 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,0096 (1.00 0,00 0.00 0.0096 Misc State Grant/Surcharge Rev 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Cable Franchise Revenue 0.00 (1,00 0.00 0,0096 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.0096 Zoning & Subdivision Fees 0.00 0.00 (1.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0,00 (1,000.00) 0.00% Plan Check Fees 5,000,00 7,396.68 2,396,68 47.9396 13,000.00 21.243.19 8,243.19 63.4196 Sale of Copies, Books, Maps 0.00 11.75 11.75 0,00% 6.00 91.75 85.25 1420.8396 Assessment Searches 120.00 75.00 (45.00) -37.50% 180.00 240.00 60.00 33.3396 Clean Up Days 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0096 Cable Operation Reimbursement 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00°.", 47.50 0.00 (47.5(1) 0.0096 Fines 5,000,00 5,062.92 62.92 1.264 15,000,00 12,326.51 (2.673.49) -17.8296 Miscellaneous 12eventie 1,500.00 250,00 (1,25(3.00) -83.3396 4,500,00 1,994.21 (2,505.79) -55.6896 Internal Charges 50.00 86.00 36.00 72.00% (50.00 584.00 434.00 289.33°A) Interest Earnings (1.00 0.00 0.00 0 .01P/ti 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,0096 Donations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0096 7,500.00 (1.00 (7,500.00) -100.00% Total Revenue 25,770.00 32,379.65 6,609.65 25.6596 124,408.13 136,572.76 12,164.63 9.78/0 EXPENSE 1110 - Mayor & Council PT Salaries 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FICA Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°A 0.00 0,00 0,00 11.(1011-, Medicare Contributions 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0011/0 0.00 0100 0,00 0.011% Workers Compensation 0,00 2(2.07 (222.07) 0.00% 36.00 222.07 (186.07) -516.86°A Nil i 'cage 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00°. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% M iscellaneous 0.00 1,500.00 (1,500.00) 0.110(1/0 0.00 1,500.00 (1,500.00) 0.00% DUCS & Subscriptions 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 3,391.00 10,339.00 (6,948,00) -204.90% Conferences X: Training 500.00 389.00 11 I MO 22.20% 655.00 987.00 (332,00) -50.69°.io Total Mayor & Council 500.00 2,111.07 (1,611.07) -322.21/0 4,082.00 13,048.07 (8,966.07) -219,65°A 1320 - Administration FT Salaries 12,755,74 I 2.574.96 180.78 1,42% 39,921.30 39,907.60 13.70 0,03% PERA C'ontributions 924.79 1,009.40 (84.61) -9,15% 2,763.76 2,893.27 ((29.51) -4.69% ICM A Contributions 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% FICA Contributions 756.95 724.32 32.63 4.31% 2,394.58 2,302.10 92.48 3.86% Medicare Contributions I 77.04 109.41 7.63 4.31% 560.06 538.42 21.64 3.86°A Health/Dental Insurance 3,127,60 2,6 11.00 516.60 16.52% 9,382.80 7,833,00 1,549,80 16.52°A Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0.00 888.00 (888.00) 0,00% 1.396.00 888.00 508.00 36,39% 011ice Supplies 592,58 634.52 (41.94) -7,08% 1,680.87 1,417,76 263,1 I I 5.65% Printed Foims 363.91 0,00 363,91 0,00% 363.91 0,00 363,91 0.00% Legal Services 4.000.00 7,570,57 (3,570.57) -89,26"A 12,000.00 12,512.07 (5)2,07) -4,27% News' ettertWebsite 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°A 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00% Assessing Services 2.000.00 2,000,00 0.00 0.00% 6,000,00 4,000.00 2,000.00 33,33% Contract Services 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0,00 0,00 0.00 0.11011/0 Postage 300.00 0.00 300.00 100.00% 900.00 799,10 100.90 11.21% Mileage 150.00 40.9 I 109,09 72.73% 450,00 40,91 409.09 90.9 I % Legal Publishing 0.00 504.00 (504.00) 1).011°,4) 0.00 823.82 (823.82) 0,11011'1, Insurance 0.00 (199,7))) 199,70 0.00% 800.00 53.30 746,71) 93,34% Cable Operation Expense 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 Miscellaneous I 00.00 218.54 (118.54) - I I 8.54% 300.00 337.93 (37,93) -12.64% Dues & Subscriptions 100.00 0,00 100,00 I 00,00% 300.00 245.00 55.00 18.33°A Books 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00D/0 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.004 Conferences & Training 66.21 790,00 (723.79) -1093.17% 66.2 I 1.185.01) (1,1 )8,79) -1689.76% Staff Development 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00°4 Total Administration 25,414.82 29,535.93 (4,121.11) -16.22"/0 79,279.49 75,777.28 3,502.21 4.42% 1410- Elections PT Salaries Office Supplies Legal Publications/Notification Election Equipment Equipment Repair County Election Fees Printed Forms iscellaneious Total Elections 0.00 0.00 0.00 (1.000'fi 0.0(1 0,00 0.0) 0.00" o 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°0 (IMO 1).00 0,00 0.00". 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00°,-o 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00°,`,, 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00° ',, 150,00 0.00 15100 100000% 0.00 0,011 11.00 (1,00"4 940,00 0,00 940,00 I 00.00°1, 0.00 0,00 0.(10 0,000'0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 100.00 0,01) I 00.00 I 00.00"/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 1,190.00 0.00 1.190.00 100.00% 1450 - Communications FT Salaries 2,9 I 6.67 1,452,90 1,463,77 50,19°.'n 8,750.00 3,890.34 4,859.66 55.54% P ERA Contributions 2 I 1.46 105,35 106.1 I 50. I 8% 634,38 282.06 352,32 55.54% FICA Contributions I 80,83 87,2.5 93,58 51.75% 542.50 233,72 308.78 56.92% Medicare Contributions 42.29 20.40 21.89 51.76% 126,88 54.65 72.23 56.93% Health/Dental Insurance 0.00 272.00 (272,00) 0000% 0.00 816.00 (816.0(1) 0.00% Worker:: Compensation 0,00 104.00 ( I 04.00) 0,00% 56.00 104,00 (48,00) -85.71°4, Newsletter 3,000.00 499.84 2,500.16 83.34% 3.000,00 2,728,18 271.82 9.06% Office Supplies 50.00 0,00 50.00 0.00% 50.00 47.86 2.14 0.00"/0 IniciTechnology/Wcb 2,000.00 4,609.00 (2,609.0() -130.45% 6,000.00 I 0,1 93,20 (4,193,20) Telephone 250.00 64.60 I 85.40 74. I 6% 750,00 129.20 620.80 82,77% Public Notices 200.00 1,315.80 (1.115.80) -557.90% 600,00 1.815.64 (1,2)5.64) -202.61% Cable Operations 275.00 229,54 45.46 16.53°/. 825.00 580,85 244. I 5 29.59% Repa iriM a int Equipment 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00%. 0.00 56,50 (56.50) 0.005) Total Communications 9,126.25 8,760.68 365.57 4.0.1"/0 21,334.75 20,932.20 402.55 1.89"/0 1520 - Finance ET Salaries 4,576.40 6,866.00 (2,289.60) -50.03% 13,729.20 18,682.16 (4,952,96) -36.08% P ERA Contributions 331.79 497.79 ((66,00) -50.03°A) 995.37 1,354.46 (359,09) -36.08",/0 FICA Contributions 283,74 403.47 ((19,73) -42.20"/0 851.21 1,101.76 (250.55) _29.43% Medicare Contributions 66,36 94.34 (27.98) -42.17n/o 199.07 257.66 (58.59) -29,43°,/n Ilea' thiDental Insurance 718.02 1,088.00 (369.98) -51.53% 2,154.06 3,264,00 (1,1(19.94) -51.53% Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00"70 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0,00 494.00 (494.00) 0.00".4 0.00 494.00 (494.00) 0,00°A Office Supplies I 00.00 40.64 59.36 59.36% (((0.00 53.25 46,75 46,75% Printed Forms 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.001-1", I 50.00 0.00 150,00 I 00,00[N, Audit Services 0.00 5.875,00 (5,875.00) 0400% 0.00 5,875.0(1 (5,875,00) (1,00°'. Contract SerVICeS 5,000.00 3,415,62 1,584.38 31.69% 5.000,00 8,983.64 (3,983.64) -79,67°,/u Software Programs 0.00 128,54 (128.54) 0.00% 0,00 128.54 ((28.54) 0.00% Mileage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00(N, 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% Miscellaneous 0,00 0.00 (1.00 0,00% 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 100.00°4, Dues & Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0,00 Conferences & Training 0,00 190.00 (190.00) 0,00% 400,00 225.00 I 75.00 43.75% Total Finance 11,076.30 19,093.40 (8,017.10) -72.38"/e 25,078.91 40,419.47 (15,340.56) -61.17°/0 11910 - Planning & Zoning FT Salaries 8,278.95 11,287,92 (3,008.97) -36.34% 24.836,85 29,254.32 (4,4(7.47) - I 7.79°;, P ERA Contributions 000,72 818.37 (218.15) -36.34IN 1,800.67 2,12(1.95 (320.28) -17.79% FICA Contributions 513.79 674.26 (16)1,97) -31.300 1,539.88 I ,741.94 (202.(16) -13.12% Medicare Contributions 12(1,04 157.73 (37.69) -31,39°-t, 360.13 407.44 (47.31) -13.14°A, flealth/Dental Insurance 886.48 1,656.00 (769.52) -86.81% 2,659.45 4,968.00 (2,308.55) -86.81% Workers Compensation 0.00 916.(0 (916,00) 0.00% 500.00 916.00 (416.(10) -83,20% Office Supplies 50,0(1 634.61 (584,6)) -1169.22"4, 150,00 1,537.62 (1,387.62) -925.08% Printed Forms 0.00 217,85 (217.85) 0.0094 0.00 217.85 (217.85) 0.0094 Engineering Services 1,500.00 5,574,43 (4,074.43) -271.63910 4,500.00 7,895,43 (3,395.43) -75.4594 Contract Services 0.00 8.264.24 (8,264,24) 0.00% 0.00 10,650.74 (10.656.74) 0.0094 klileagc 30.00 0,00 30.00 100.0091, 90.0(1 0.00 90.00 100.00% Miscellaneous 20.00 314.05 (294.05) -1470.2594 00.00 332.25 (272.25) -453.7594 Dues 8'... Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0094 0,00 0.00 0.00 Books 0.011 0.00 0.00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0094 Conferences & Training 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0094 Total Planning & Zoning 11,999.00 30,515.46 (18,516.46) -154.32"/0 36,496.99 60,048.54 (23,551.55) -64.53 °A 1930 - Engineering Services Engineering Services 5,000.00 2,738.56 2,261,44 45.739', 15,000.00 6,274.80 8,725.20 58.1794 Total Engineering Services 5,000.00 2,738.56 2,261 A4 45.23"/o 15,000.00 6,274.80 8,725.20 58.17% 1940 - City Hall Cleaning Supplies 50.00 0.00 50, 100.11094 150,00 0.00 150.00 100.0094 Building Repair Supplies 75,00 0,00 75.00 100.0094 225.00 0.00 225,00 100.0094 Telephone 700.00 180.12 519.88 74.2794 2,300.00 415.79 1,884,21 81.9294 Utilities 900.00 1,301.54 (401.54) -44.62'N 2,700.00 2,746.03 (46.03) -1.7094 Refuse I 08.32 108.32 0.00 0.0094 324.96 216.64 108.32 33.3394 Repairsiklaint Contractual Bldg 700.00 538.75 161.25 23.0494 2,100.00 1,720,51 379,49 18.0794 RepairsiMaint Contractual Equip 400.00 803,29 (403.29) -100.82% 1,200.00 803.29 396.71 33.0094 Miscellaneous 75.00 0.00 75,00 100,0094 225.00 47,92 177,08 78.7094 Total City Hall 3,008,32 2,932.02 76.30 2.54`)/0 9,224.96 5,950.18 3,274.78 35.50°A Total General GM ernmcnt 66,124.69 95,687.12 (29,562.43) -44.7194 191,687.10 222,450.54 (30,763.44) -16.0594 DEPT 420 - PUBLIC SAFETY 2100 - Police Law Enforcement Contract Total Police 2150 - Prosecution Attorney Criminal Total Prosecution 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 034.72 (634.22) 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 634.22 (634.22) 0.00/0 4,250,00 4,260.50 (10.50) 12,750,00 8,510.50 4,239.50 33.7.5".4( 4,250.00 4,260.50 (10.50) -0.25% 12,750.00 8,510.50 4,239.50 33.25% 2220 - Fire FT Salaries 0,000.00 5,701.46 298.54 4.98% 18,000.00 10.575.86 1,424.14 7.91t1/0 PT Salaries 10,000.00 7,126.21 2,873.79 28.74% 30,000.00 33,253,81 (3.253.81) -10.8.5°,/0 P ERA Contributions I ,160.00 960,41 199.59 17.21°,(i 3,480,00 7,773.83 706.17 20,29°./0 FICA Contributions 992.00 397.62 594.38 50.97°A, 2,976.00 1,905,90 I ,070.04 35,96% Medicare Contributions 232.00 179.64 52.36 22.57% 690.00 704.43 (8.43) -1,21% Health/Dental Insurance 1,276.70 I ,142.00 134.70 10.55% 3.8311.09 3,426.00 404,09 10.55% Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°,,`G 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0,00 9,805.00 (9,805.00) 0,00% 10,130.00 9,805,00 325.00 3,71% Office Supplies 125.00 974.43 (799.43) -039,54% 125.00 1,080.35 (955,35) -764.28% EMS Supplies 150.00 0,00 150.00 I 00.00% 150.00 253.50 (103,50) -69.00% Fire Prevention 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0011/0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% Fuel, Oil & Fluids 1,122.00 759.64 367,36 32,30% 3,366.00 1,618.51 1,747.49 51,92".1, Small Tools & Equip 0,0(1 (9,003,52) 9,003.52 0,00% 8,200.00 592,29 7,007.71 92.7811,10 Physicals 2,542.60 0,00 2.547.00 100.00% 2.842.60 100,00 2,742,60 96.48% Telephone 25(1.00 269.71 119,71) -7.88% 750.00 539.42 210,58 28,08`t() Radio 3.846.08 0,00 3,846,08 100.00% 3,946.08 239A0 3,706.68 93.935 Mileage 0.00 99.44 (99.44) 0.00(tio 0.00 99.44 (99.44) 0.00°A, Vehicle Insurance 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% Electric Utility 900.00 1,835,79 (935.79) -103.98% 2,700.00 3,714,81 (1,014.81) -37.59% Refuse 47.68 47.68 0.00 0.00% 143,04 95.36 47,68 33.33% Repair/Maint Bldg 376.30 7,761.27 (7,384.97) -1962.52% 1,128,90 8,735.91 (7,607.))1) -673.84% Repair/Main t Equip 1,800.00 1,358.79 441.21 24.51% 9,756.00 3_509,30 6,240.70 64.03% Uniforms 150.00 0,00 150.00 I 00,00% 450.00 242.88 207,12 46,034 Miscellaneous 75.00 0,00 75,00 100.00'1/0 225.00 198.71 76.29 11,68% Dues & Subscriptions 400.00 0.00 400.00 IOU, 00'N) 2,000.00 2.2 10.00 (210,00) -10.50'4, Books 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00'N, 0.00 0.00 0,00 0M01?-4, Conferences & Training 500.00 044.66 (144,66) -28.93% 11.200.00 1,270,85 9,979.15 , 88,65",--i, Total Fire 31,945.36 30,010.23 1,935.13 6.06°/e 116,094.71 92,945.62 23,149.09 19.94% 2250 - Fire Relief Fire State Aid Total Fire Relief 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0 0011i, 0.00"/0 2400 - Building Inspection FT Salaries 5,747,36 0,689.06 (94 1,70) -16.3P-it 17,242.08 19,508,26 (2,326,18) -13A9'1,-), PERA Contributions 329.75 484,98 (155.73) -47,301V0 9(17,07 1,418,73 (511.66) -56,411).-;) FICA Contributions 273.24 389.47 (116,18) -47.57(14 757.85 1.139.56 (380.71) -51.37% Medicare Contributions 63,91 9 I .08 (27.17) -42.51 176.08 266,57 (90.44) -51.36?,(t Health/l)ental Insurance 767,49 1,414,00 (646,5)) -84.24% 2.302,47 4,242.00 (1.939.53) -84.24% Unemployment Benefiis 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0,00 (1,00 0,00% Workers Compensation 0.00 485.00 (485.00) 0,00% I ,000.00 485.00 515,00 51,50°-fl ()nice Supplies 0.00 31.64 (3(.64) (1.011°A, 0.00 193,78 (193.78) 0.00% Printed Forms 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.011% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% Fuel, Oil & Fluids 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00'At 0.00 54.08 (54,68) 0.00"A, Engineering 500,00 884,50 (384.50) -76.9094 1,500,00 1,514.50 (14.50) -0.97111 Surcharge Pints 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0011/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Inspector Contract Services ((,00 150,50 (15)1.50) 0,00°A, 0.0(1 236.50 (230.50) Telephone 18,00 50.07 (32,07) -178.1794 54.00 100.14 (46.14) -85.4494 M ileage 0.00 35.85 (35,85) 0,0094 0.00 35.85 (35.85) 0.0094 Insurance 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0094 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,01194 Repairs/Maint Equip 250.00 0,00 250.00 100.0094 250.00 0.00 250,00 100,0094 Uniforms 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.001 0.00 86.38 (86.38) (1,0094 Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0011/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 Dues & Subscriptions 90.00 0.00 90.00 100.0094 90.00 0.01) 90,00 100.0094 Books 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0094 Conferences & Training 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 280.00 (280.00) 0.00"1,_ Total Building Inspections 8,039.25 10,706.10 (2,666.85) -33.17"/0 24,274.55 29,621.90 (5,347.35) -22.03"/o 2500 - Emergency Communications Contract Services Total Emergency Communications 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2700 - Animal Control Printed Forms 0100 0,00 Contract Services 550.00 500.00 Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 Total Animal Control 550.00 500.00 Total Public Safety 44,784.61 45,476.83 0,00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 (692.22) 0.0094 0.00°/0 0 (10'1'0 9,09'1), 0.00"/e 9.09% -1.55`1/9 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00"/o 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0094 1,650.00 I .000.00 650.00 39.3994 0,00 30.00 (30,00) 0.0094 1,650.00 1,030.00 620.00 37.58"/0 154,769.26 132,742.24 22,027.02 14.23"/o DEPT 430 PUBLIC WORKS 3100 - Public Works FT Salaries 10,700.00 17,738,40 (2,038.4))) -19.05% 32,100.00 37,858.43 (5,758.43) -17,94°-,, PT Salaries 0,00 194.49 (194.49) 0.00% 0.00 801.20 (801.20) 0,00% PERA Contributions 775,75 933.28 (157.53) -20.31% 7,327.25 2,802.82 (475.57) -20,43% FICA Contributions 603.40 752.94 (89,54) -13.50% 1,990,29 2267,07 (271.87) -13.60% Medicare Contributions 155.15 176.07 (20,92) -13,48% 465.45 529,06 03,01) -13.67% Health/Dental Insurance 2,893.14 0.00 2,893.14 100,00°4, 8.679.43 5.798.00 2,881.43 33.20% Unemployment Benefits 2.50000 0.00 2500.00 100.00% 2.500.00 0.00 2,500.00 100,00% Workers Compensation 0.00 9,022.00 (9,022,00) 0.00% 3,000.00 9,077.00 (6,022.00) -200.73% Office Supplies 50.00 0.00 50.00 I 00,00% 150.01) 84.95 65,05 43.37% Shop Materials 150,00 112.37 37.63 75.09% 450.00 304,59 85.41 18.98% Building Repair Supplies 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00°,i, 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Small Tools and Minor Equip 250,00 182.07 67.93 27.17% 750.00 691.95 58.05 7.74°<, Engineering Services 150.00 945.00 (795.00) -530.00% 450.00 1,282.50 (832.50) -185,00°,/,, Contract Services 400.00 0,00 400.00 100.0051, 1,200,00 0.00 1.200.011 100.00% .feleplione 700,00 326,14 373,86 53.41% 7,100.00 702.80 1,397.20 60.53°4, Radio 300.00 0,00 300.00 100.0011/0 900.00 0,00 900.00 100,0051, Mileage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00°,,, Insurance 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00°4, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°4, Electric Utility 2,000.00 2,699,03 (699.03) -34.95% 0,000.00 5,902.74 97.26 1.62% Refuse 207,82 207.82 0.00 0.0051, 073.46 415.64 207.82 33.33% Fuel. Oil, Fluids (ALL depts) 3,000,00 7,110.14 (4,11(1,14) - I 37.00°4, 9,00)1.00 8,038,19 361,81 4,02°A lepairIM aim Bklg 250.00 1,124,25 (874.25) -349.70°,4, 750.00 2,118.10 (1,368.10) -182.41% ItepairMaint NOT Bldg 45.00 0.00 45.00 I 00.00% 135,00 115,00 20.00 14.81% Repair/Maint Equip (out) 500.00 6.65 493.35 98.67% 1,500.00 140.73 1,35927 90.62% Equipment Parts 500.00 0,00 500,00 100,00% 1,50(1.00 0.00 1,500.00 I 00,00% linifomis 175.00 244.67 (69.67) -39.81°4, 525.00 368,57 156.43 29.80% ivliscellancous 75.00 0,00 75.00 100.0051 775.00 0.00 225.00 100,00% Landscaping Material 85.00 0.00 85,00 100.00% 255.00 0,00 255.00 100.000/0 Dues & Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00/n 60.00 56.00 4.00 6 . 6 7 'in Conferences & Training 0.00 100.00 (100.00) 0.005,, 619.00 160,00 459.00 74.18% Clean up Days 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Total Public NN'orks 26,525.26 36,935.32 (10,410.06) -39.25"/0 78,255.39 80,175.34 (1,919.95) 3120 - Streets Equipment Pails Street Maintenance Materials Sign Repair Materials Contract Services Repairs/Maint Equipment Total Streets 0,00 117,61 (117.61) 0,00% 0,00 317,87 (317.87) 0,00°4, 1.000.00 137.55 862,45 86,25% 3,000,00 137.55 2,862.45 95.42% 250.00 0,00 250.00 100,00% 750,00 0,00 750.00 100.00% 850.00 0.00 850,00 100,00M 7,550,00 0.00 2,550.00 100.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 2,100.00 255.16 1,844.84 87.85% 6,300.00 455.42 5,844.58 92,77°A) 3125 - Ice & Snow Removal 1.andseaping Material 0.00 0,00 0,00 (OWN, 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.0011'0 Sand:Solt 0,00 28,107.67 (28,)07.67) 0.00% 25,000.00 46,01443 (21.0)4,43) Contract Services 1,250,00 3.144.00 (1,894.0(1) -151,52% 6.250,00 3,144.00 3,106,00 49,70% Repai rs/Maint Equipment 250,00 4,1 18.32 (3,86832) -1.547.331! i, 750.00 4,734,91 (3,984,91) -531,32% Total Ice & Snow Removal 1,500.00 35,369.99 (33,869.99) -2258.00"/0 32,000.00 53,893.34 (21,893.34) -68.42% 3160 - Street Lighting Street "total Street Lighting 2,100.00 7,333.21 (233.21) -11,11% 2,100.00 2,333.21 (233.21) -11.11"/0 6,300.00 4,674.11 1,625 89 25.81(l.1, 6,300.00 4,674.11 1,625.89 25.81% 3200 - Recycling ltecycling Supplies 30000 (U)) 300.00 I 00,00", n 300,00 0.00 300.00 100.00% Newsletter 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00'1'ii 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% M iscel laneous 400.00 0.00 400,00 100,001'.'0 1,200,00 0,00 1.200.00 I 00.009(, Total Recycling 700.00 0.00 700.00 100,00% 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 100.00°A 3250 - Tree Program Contract Services Total Tree Program Total Public Works 400,00 0.00 400.00 100,00% 400.00 0.00 400,00 100.00"/o 33,325.26 74,893.68 — (41,568.42) -124.74"/o — 1,200.00 0.00 1,200,00 100.00% 1,200.00 0.00 1,200,00 100.00"/0 125,555.39 139,198.21 — (13,642.82) -10.87% DEPT 450 - CUL1URE, RECREATION 5200 - Parks & Recreation FT Salaries 8,583,96 63916.38 1,667.58 19,43% 25,751.88 21,933.74 3,818.64 14.83% PT Salaries 1.500,00 1.102,09 397.91 26.53"iii 7,500.00 4,880.09 2,619.91 34.93% P ERA Contributions 677.34 580.26 42,08 6.76°'(, 1,867.01 1,996,39 ((29.38) -6,9391) RCA Contributions 625.21 469.19 156.07 74.9511.1, 2,061.62 1,642.36 419.76 20,34°4 Medicare Contributions 146.22 109.77 36.50 24,96% 482,15 384.07 98,08 20.34°-,i 1 lealth/Dental Insurance 1,084,57 290.16 794,41 73.254 3.753,77 2,115.68 1,138.04 34,9814 Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00)4 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0.00 5,006.00 (5,006.00) 0,00% 3,000,00 5,006,00 (2,006.00) Shop Materials 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Chemicals 50.00 0.00 50.00 100.00°/(i 150.00 0.00 150.00 100,00% Equipment Parts 150.00 0,00 150.00 I 00.00"A 450,00 23.50 426,50 94.78% Building Repair Supplies 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Landscaping Materials 200.00 0.00 200.00 100,00% 600.00 0.011 600.00 100,0054 Small Tools and NI Mot- Equip 75.00 1,569.14 (1,494.14) -1992,19% 775.00 1,569,14 (1,344.14) -597.4054 Telephone 100.00 75.26 24.74 24.7454 300.00 150,63 149,37 49,7954 Mileage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0054 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0054 Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0096 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0054 Electric Utility 750,00 934.36 ((84.36) -24.5854 2,250.00 2.166.68 83.32 3 , 70"/0 Refuse 207.8.2 2)17.82 0,00 0.0054 623.46 415.64 207.82 33,3354 Repair/Maint Bldg 25.00 0.00 25.00 100.0054 75.00 0.00 75,00 100.0054 Repair/Maint NOT Bldg 50,00 0.00 50.00 100,0054 150.00 0.00 150.00 100.0054 Repair/Maint Equip 100.00 03)0 100.00 100,0054 300.00 0,00 300.00 100.0054 Rental Buildings 400,00 0,00 400.00 100.0054 1,200.00 0,00 1,200.00 100,0054 Miscellaneous 0,00 85,00 (85.00) 0.0054 0.00 85.00 (85.00) 0,0054 Total Parks & Recreation 14,670.11 17,345.38 (2,675.27) -18.24"/0 50,239.84 42,368.42 7,871.42 15.67"/0 DEPT 460 - CONIP ADJ 0.00 0 0 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0094 DEPT 490 - CONTINGENCY FUND 0.00 0 0 0.0054 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0054 DEPT 493 - OTII FINANCING 0,00 0 0 0.0054 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0054 GRAND TOTAL ALL DEPTS 158,904.67 233,403.01 (74,498.34) -46.88"/0 522,251.59 536,759.41 (14,507.82) -2.7854 Net Income over Expenses (133,134.67) (201,023.36) (67,888.69) 50.9954 (397,843.46) (400,186.65) (2,343.19) 0.59"/I) TI 117. (Try ()E: „ E F MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 5 MOTION Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: March Permit Report SUBMITTED BY: Rick Chase, Building Official THROUGH: Rick Chase, Building Official REVIEWED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED:, As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to accept the monthly permit report. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. STAFF REPORT: Below are the year to date key statistics for March 2013: 2013 1012 2011 Total Building permits: 37 37 45 Total Building valuation: $4,047,943 82,213,268 $1,815.783 New homes 8 3 3 Total valuation $3,307,289 $1,685,412 $1,000,000 Avg home value $413,411 $561,804 $333,333 -17 IN E mazmatrrngfr.,;„''' MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 6 AGENDA ITEM: Production Well No. 4 — Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Mike Bouthilet, Public Works SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (i0-emoved from the Conent At,enda): Questions from Council to Staff.. ............ ....... Public Input, if Appropriate ...... ..... ...... ......... . ......... Callfor Motion ......... ........ .......... .............................. ........ Discussion........ ....... . ........... ...... . ......... . ........... ..... Action on Motion.................. ..... ..... ...... ..... .... SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: ........Mayor Facilitates ... Mayor Facilitates Mayor & City Council Mayor & City Council .. Mayor Facilitates The City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Production Well No. 4. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-26, Approving the plans and specificationsd ordering the advertisenzent fin. bids .for Production Well No. 4." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Plans and Specifications have been completed for Production Well No. 4. The Engineer's opinion of probable construction cost is S421,000. The improvements include: Construction of a municipal water supply production well capable of producing 1,250 gallons of sand free water per minute, to be located on newly acquired property near 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue. • A Jordan Formation well to be constructed to an approximate depth of 300 feet with a 24-inch diameter casing and open boring hole and an 18-inch welded steel casing pipe. Development and test pumping with the goal to obtain a 1,250 gallon per minute (pm) capacity well. Testing and chemical analytics of the water quality to determine that the water supply meets all primary safe drinking water standards, including safe standards for perflourochemicals (PFCs). The purchase and installation of a 1,250 gpm well pump. The contract requires the well driller to return to the project site upon completion of the Pumphouse construction to install the pump and participate in project start-up. Erosion control, cleanup and site restoration. Construction of Water Supply Well No. 4 is needed to supplement the supply capacity of the city's municipal water system in order to satisfy peak summer demands and support further expansion of the water system customer base from new growth and development. The need for Well No. 4 is documented in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Water System Plan and has been programmed in the 2013 Capital Improvement Program. Test Well No. 4 was completed in February of 2012 to confirm adequate production capacity and water quality for the proposed well site near 50th Street N and Lake Elmo Avenue. Upon the successful completion of Test well No. 4, a 1.38 Acre Site was purchased at 11250 50th Street North to locate the new Well and Pumphouse. The site includes a shared driveway with the property located directly north and contains adequate space to provide setback distances in accordance with the well criteria established by the Minnesota Department of Health. In the near future, the city engineer will recommend that the council authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of Pump House No. 4 to be constructed under a separate contract. A third contract will be commissioned for a new 12-inch diameter trunk connecting watermain from the well location to connect with the existing watermain near the intersection of Lake Elmo Avenue and 43rd Street N. FUNDING: Project costs for the design and construction of Production Well No. 4, Pump House No. 4 and the Lake Elmo Avenue Connecting Trunk Watennain are all incorporated into the city's S1.0 million DEED Water System Grant Agreement. It is a requirement of the DEED Grant that the city provide a match of S1.0 Million, anticipated to be funded through bond proceeds. Combined with the Keats Trunk Watermain Extension, the city will be constructing almost $2.6 million in water infrastructure projects. The state's obligation to fund the DEED Grant shall terminate if the entire Grant has not been disbursed by December 31, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending the city council approve, as part of the Consent Agenda, Resolution No. 2013-26, thereby approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Production Well No. 4. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-26, Approving the plans and specifications and ordering the adverrisementfor bids for Production Well No. 4." ATTACHMENT(Sj: 1. Resolution No. 2013-26 2. Project Schedule 3. Production Well No. 4 Plans and Specifications (available for revievi. at City Hall) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 4 WHEREAS, pursuant a resolution passed by the city council on the 5th day of February, 2013, the city engineer, together with Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. has prepared plans and specifications for Production Well No. 4 and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at Lake Elmo City Hall and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance & Commerce an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for at least 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that sealed bids provided to the City Clerk prior to the specified bid date and time and accoinpanied by a bid bond or cashier's check made payable to the City of Lake Elmo in an amount not less than 5% of the amount of such bid will be considered. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor Resolution No. 2013-26 [����A��T������[�U|� ^ ,v����—�~ / SCHEDULE PRODU|�—T|��0J WELL NJ�� ,� CTION / /��v� w� �—�—�- .n��. —r . PROJECT NO. 2013.125 ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Geheren,pE. Jack Griffin, P.E. RyanStempxki F.E. Chad |s*kson'P.E. Revised April 2013 February 5,ZD13 Council authorizes the Preparation ofplans and specifications. February lI,IOl3 Project kickoff meeting. 651.300.4261 651.300.4I64 051.300.4267 651.300.4283 April 16,ZOI3 Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Contractor Bids. (estimated 8 weeks) May l6,ZOI] Accept Contractor Bids May %l,2O13 Contract Award. May Z4,Z0I3 Process and send out Contract Documents. June 7, 2013 Receipt nfContractor's Bonds / Legal Review. June 11,2U13 Conduct Pre -construction Meeting and Issue Notice toProceed. 0ctober,ZOl3 Production Well Contractor Work is substantially complete (estimated 19 weeks). Novernber,IOl3 Final Completion Date. Record As'bui|ts;Testing Results; and Close-out Documents. TI (:11" ,NKE. FLMO AGENDA ITEM: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 7 MOTION As part of Consent Agenda Adopting Amended Resolution Authorizing Limited Property Tax Abatement for 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 SUBMITTED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent .42-endat Introduction of Item and Report/Presentation....................... City Administrator Questions from Council to Staff .................... ..... ....... ......... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ......... ..... ..................... ...... ......... .......... Mayor & City Council Discussion ....... ...... ................................................ ....... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ............ ...... ............... ...... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ,.ACTION..REOVESTED; As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, authorizing a property tax abatement for a commercial property located in the 1-94 Corridor Planning Area (8665 Hudson Boulevard). If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, Authorizing Limited Property Tax Abaremenrfor 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017" BACKGROUND INFORMATI0N: On February 19, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2013-11, which authorized limited property tax abatement for 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Resolution No. 2013-27 simply changes the name of the purchasing company from "Valley Cartage" to "Norman James, LLC." Norman James, LLC is the name of the real estate holding company that is purchasing the building, while Valley Cartage, Inc. is the company who will be leasing the building. Todd Gilbert is a 50% owner of Norman James, LLC and is the sole owner of Valley Cartage, Inc. STAFF REPORT: The City of Lake Elmo has worked with Washington County to determine a total abatement figure of S40,000 over a period of 4 years to offset the artificiality of the assessment policy and free up liquidity for the creation of jobs. Washington County approved its Tax Abatement Resolution and Agreement for its part of the project on Tuesday April 9, 2013 at its County Board Meeting, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda Resolution No. 2013-27. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, Authorizing Limited Property Tax .4batement 8665 Hudson Boulevard fin. years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017" ATTACHMENTS: . Resolution No. 2013-77 SUGGESTED 0 ER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Agenda): Introduction of Item and Report/Presentation........ ..... ....... City Administrator Questions from Council to Staff .......... ............. ...... . ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ........ ..... . ....... ............................... Mayor & City Council Discussion ........... . ...... . ........ .......... ........ ..... ........ Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ............... ..... .............. ..... .............. Mayor Facilitates 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-27 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIMITED PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR 8665 HUDSON BOULEVARD FOR YEARS 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, under Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 272. 273 and Chapter 489, has the authority to value and assess all real property within its jurisdictional boundaries and, WHEREAS, Minnesota law authorizes political subdivisions to grant property tax abatements for economic development to encourage businesses to locate or expand to an area (Minn. Stat. §§ 469.1819-459.1816) and, WHEREAS, abatements are available for up to 15-20 years and the total abatement cannot exceed the larger of ten percent (10%) of the net tax capacity or $200,000.00 and, WHEREAS, Norman James LLC of Woodbury, MN wishes to purchase and relocate to 8665 Hudson Boulevard in the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota creating approximately fifty (50) or more jobs providing significant compensation in the area of logistics transportation that will stimulate the local economy and, WHEREAS, the fifty (50) or more jobs include positions in the transportation logistics industry that pay between $35,000490,000 per year created by 2015 and that are subject to Minnesota state income tax and, WHEREAS, the current assessed market value of 8665 Hudson Boulevard has been placed at $2,125,500 for the last two years and the building is currently built out at approximately the 80°,70 level and, WHEREAS, the purchase price will include non -real property assets and thus will not solely reflect the value of the improvements and land and, WHEREAS, Norman James LLC has requested a limited property tax abatement for the years 2014-2017 as well as consideration of limited property tax abatement for 2018, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the public benefits involved would include, but will not be limited to, general economic development, ultimately increasing the tax base, increasing the number of jobs in the area, and spurring economic activity along the 1-94 corridor and these benefits would exceed the cost of abating the City portion of property taxes for the years 2014- 2017 arising from any increase in the property value above the current assessed valuation ($2.125,200.00). Resolution No. 2013-27 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, agrees to abate the increase in the city portion of property taxes paid, excluding fiscal disparities, on parcel 33.029.21.44.0037 as follows: 1. For the purpose of this agreement, "increase in the city portion of property taxes paid, excluding fiscal disparities" specifically excludes any portion of the tax attributable to the area -wide tax under M.S. § 473F from abatement. The amount of tax abatement is calculated as follows for each parcel with an increase in taxable market value for a given year: a. Calculate the base year city tax for the parcel i. Multiply current year class rates by the taxable market value for taxes payable in 2012 (S2,125,200) to deterrnine the total tax capacity. ii. Multiply the total tax capacity by the fiscal disparity percentage for the current year to determine the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity. iii. Subtract the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity from the total tax capacity to determine the local tax capacity. iv. Multiply the local tax capacity by the city tax rate for the current year to determine the base year city tax. b. Calculate the current year city tax for the parcel i. Multiply current year class rates by the taxable market value for the current year to determine the total tax capacity. ii. Multiply the total tax capacity by the fiscal disparity percentage for the current year to determine the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity. iii. Subtract the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity from the total tax capacity to deterrnine the local tax capacity. iv. Multiply the local tax capacity by the city tax rate for the current year to determine the current year city tax. c. Subtract the base year city tax from the current year city tax to determine the change in city tax. d. The change in city tax greater than SO is the amount of tax abatement for the year. Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no city abatement will be granted if the total taxes due on the parcel is less than the total tax amount due for taxes payable in 2012 of 570,256. 4. The maximum duration of the abatement shall be for four years, beginning for taxes payable in 2014, except that the City Council will consider an abatement for the year 2018 if requested by the property owner. 5. The maximum annual tax abatement amount shall not exceed 510,000.00 in any year and maximum total abatement for all years for all abating parties shall not exceed S40,000.00. Resolution No. 2013-27 6. The City of Lake Elmo will make payment of the abatement to the property owner on or before July 30 of each year. No payment will be made after July 30, 2017 or after the total abatement for the four abatement years has been paid. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 20'13-27 TI II: CITY ()I: A K E F. L MO MAYOR AND COUNC DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: COMMUNICATION 04/16/2013 AGENDA ITEM: Special Event Permit: Wild Adventure Race Spring. Sprint - Sunfish Lake Park/Lake Elmo Park Reserve SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Director of Planning Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Nick Johnson, City Planner SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item .................. ...... ....... ......................... ..... ................. Staff Report/Presentation ..... ...... ............. .......... ................. ..... ............ ...... .............. Staff Questions from Council to Staff ........... ..... .............. ..... ............. Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate .......... .......... ................................ Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ..... ........................... ....... . ...... .......... ...... Mayor & City Council Discussion... ...... .................. ...... ........ ....... ................ ......... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ............ ....... ..... ................ ..... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to approve a request from Liz DeJonge of Wild Adventure Race to conduct an orienteering/trail run within Sunfish Lake Park as part of a larger race event to be conducted within the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The event would be conducted on Saturday. June 1 and would involve a biking, boating, and running component, with only the former element being conducted within the City park property. This event was conducted last year during the first weekend in June and Staff is not aware of any issues that arose due to the special event. PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT Special events are allowed under City Code via a perrnit issued by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None — all costs associated with the event will be borne by the applicant. There are no anticipated public expenses associated with the event. BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Since the planned event is ahnost identical to the one conducted last year, the applicant has asked that the materials attached to the previous application be included with the current request. Staff has also included the relevant review comments from last year as part of this report. The applicant has completed a special event permit application form and provided a project narrative that provides additional details about the event (submitted with last year's application). The event being proposed would be a rely -type race that requires participants to navigate a course with maps and a compass. The portions of the race that will take place in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve will involve the use of boats and bicycles, while the portion in Sunfish Lake Park will involve runners on foot. Since the event is an orienteering race, there will be flags placed along the relay route at various checkpoints. An example of the flags to be used is included in the application narrative. Other than the runners using the park and the flags to be placed along the route, the only other impact to Sunfish Lake Park will be the parking of bicycles in the parking lot and the gathering of event volunteers in this location to assist the participants. The event is not expected to draw spectators and will not involve the use of sound systems or other activities that could be a potential nuisance to surrounding neighbors or park users. A special event permit has been deemed necessary for this event because it will involve more than 100 participants within a 24-hour period and is a privately -sponsored event. The ordinance for Special Events also lists a series of information that must be provided or requirements that must be met in order to conduct the event, which includes the following: Maximum Number of People: 200 competitors and 10 volunteers • Sound Equipment: None • Sanitary Facilities: None (event starts and ends in the Park Reserve) • Security: The applicant is working with Washington County Parks to secure proper pen -nits for access to the park. Volunteers will be used to monitor the bike drop area and to help monitor the crossing at Highway 5. • Food Service: None provided at Sunfish Lake Park • Fire Protection: None required, please see previous comments from the Fire Chief below. • Duration of Special Event: June 1, 2012 between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. (with two additional hours for setup and teardown). Racers will be in Sunfish Lake Park between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. • Cleanup Plan: Removal of flags and clearing of parking lot. • Waivers: None requested. • Insurance: To be secured within two weeks of event; example certificate submitted prior to last year's event included with application. In addition to the above requirements, the applicant has indicated that they will have EMT's on the site during the event. As part of the previous permit review one year ago the Fire Chief requested that access be maintained into the park for emergency vehicles and also, in the event that his department is called in, a point of contact that assist with any emergency. Staff will again be providing the proper contact information to the Fire Chief, and is suggesting that one of the conditions of approval include a provision that access into the park not be blocked off during any part of the event. The applicant has indicated that they obtain insurance closer to the race event, and therefore, has submitted only the form use last year as an example of the document that will be used. Staff is recommending that an additional condition of approval require the submission of proper insurance documentation at least two weeks prior to the event date. 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information and staff report, it is recommended that the City Council approve a Special Event Permit for Wild Adventure Race to conduct an orienteering/trail run within Sunfish Lake Park as part of a larger race event to be conducted within the Lake Elmo Park Reserve on June 1, 2012 with the following conditions of approval: . Access into Sunfish Lake Park shall not be blocked at any time during the course of the event. 2. A valid certificate of insurance meeting the requirements of Section 110.070 (E, 1, j) of the City Code shall be submitted at least two weeks prior to the event." ATTACHMENT(: 1. Special Event Permit Application Form 2. Application Narrative (Submitted for previous event) 3. Example Certificate of Insurance Special Event Permit Application I. Title and Brief Description of Event 1:1; 17,2 7;- 11. Applicant Information , K E ELMO The applicant is responsible for answering all questions, including inquiries from media and citizens. « Applicant: L.J.c.„ Address: Business/Organization: ;„1! k-) Title: Daytime Phone: Mobile Phone: Emergency Phone: III. Event Timetable A. Requested day and date: B. Requested Hours of Operation, from C. Set up beginning day and date_ D. Dismantle by day and date Anticipated number ot participants: 11 L,UI a I fl..0 , to ..- - - time . ,,:-1,,n-ii.lp.ii ; L.., , time r„, a.m. and spectators: an event is covered. The policy must also show evidence that the requested event is not excluded ir urn insurame dLlill , „ S.` / "".:; V. Check All Items that Apply to your Event ' � Use of Public Facility (note fad|hv): �..L� Event participant and/or spectator parking areas (deschbe): l'� Entertainment or stage location (provide to -scale drawings); Construction or erection of temporary structures (may need permit: check with planning Trash containers (indicate # and /ocadons)- Pnrtab/etoiletfad|ides(indicate#andkzcatkzns), � First aid facilities (indicate who isprovd)no): ~^ �- �'- �� ^�c_ �7�`^ Parade and/or parade floats (may need penmh); Fireworks and/or pyrotechnics site (may need permit, check with the fire department); Cooking facilities, open flame, or vehicle fuels (may need permit, check with fire department)-, L� Electricity (indicate source and plan): [ ( Other (please describe\: 0. Food, Beverages, and/or Entertainment A. If your event includes music, live entertainment, sound amplification or any other noise impact, please describe, including the intended hours of the music, sound or noise. .� B. Will alcoholic beverages heserved? Yes { No C. Name ofliquor establishment: D. �ofservi��eo�alcohol vc�sidca|ice^seUprcmi�e,indu�ead|a�rarn�huwin�thed��ned area of the alcohol concession service and attach a copy of your certificate of liquor iiahiiityinsurance rovehnEr the |i'nhsnft�n�}coho1sprvic,­�area, B. If the event is to occur at night, describe how you will light the event area in order to increase the safety of participants and spectators coming to and leaving the event: IX. Clean-up List persons responsible for clean-up duties: • X. Mitigation of Impacts on Others Describe how you intend to mitigate the impacts of the special event on businesses, churches, neighbors, motorists, and others: „ ; 1 t - ' +1 ' Note: Any condition iAihich causes adverse impacts may be cause to revoke the Special Events Permit - Applicant Signature:.: Date of Application: 4 ��Ol�est fSpecial �eCEvent'EvenEventPermit- -^ r What: Wild Adventure Race Sprint SoriesRace I When: Where: Sun Fish Lake Park and Lake G|rno Park Reserve 7[bne: h:OO acotu 4:00 pm (race cnnuperitorswill be in the park from approximately IO-ODarn Lo2:O0 pm) Description: An adventure race iSateam sport that requires navigating course with maps and a compass utilizing cunnbioudoos of non -motorized disciplines - on foot, bike, and in boats (canoe, kayak, or raft). It is very similar to orienteering, which has been done atSun Fish Lake Park in the past. in this particular event, which is designed for beginners, racers in teams of 2 will begin on bikes in Lake E|nnu Park Reserve (LbPR), They will be looking for checkpoints along the way. Checkpoints are ueocraUy orange and white, lightweight orienteering fiags (see image), Racers will also be doing a boat section in LEPR. These two sections couN take teams up to Z firs to cornp\otc' thus spreading our teams quite a bit. After the bike and boat sections teams will leave LEPD by the North EoLrance'croox Hwy 5.and enter Sun Fish Lake Park. Tearns will then drop their bikes with volunteers in a section o[the parkio�lot orjusLoff the lU�nearthe Lroi|bcad. TaarnswiUthen QoVn [oui to look for more checkpoints, approximately S-lO of them. Most teams should finish in under l hour. Once the section is complete, teams will retrieve their bikes arid head back. across Hwy 5 to the finish in LEPK. The whole course should take the avcragetcucn 3 hours. There may be one or two volunteer vehicles, but other than that, the only space we will be occupying is an area with the bikes. This is very flexible. With the start and finish in LEPR, there will limited impact in Sun Fish [.abc Park. The Minnesota Orienteering Club held asimilar event inthe park several years ago. We have permission from LEPR and we are coordinating the crossing ofHwry 5 with the Washington County Sheriff's Office and MnDOT. MouPenn}e; 200 connpcii1oru plus up to lO volunteers. The competitors will be well spread ovL VVevvUl not disturb regular park visitors any more than an), other traU runner would. In hact, the cuolinenLvve usu:Uy roceivefrorn park managers and staff isthat visitors were not even aware anevent was happening iothe park. Sound Eqoionmeol: Nuou 5moitorvFacilbies: None required, the competitors will bcrunning nn the trails for approximately l hour and then will head to LEPR. Security: VVc will have volunteers at the bike drop. Competitors will retrieve bikes after they have done the trail run and return toLEP}L Food Service: No food will be provided at Sun Fish Lake Park Fire Protection: Not applicable Clean Un Plan: Clean up will rocrc|y mean removing 5-I0 orange and white orienteering On�s that have been placed along the trails, and making sure the parking lot is clear ofany possible wrappers from "energy bars" consumed by the participants. This will take nomore than one hour, Waiver: NA Insurance: We carry a $] million 'insurance per occurrence and provide additional insured certificates for land owners/managers. Provided is an example from a previous race of an additional insured certificate for the City o[Duluth. Safety: VVevvd|have EM7`sonsite. Miscellaneous: Parkin- will not be needed (except fur volunLeervebic]e or two), but bikes will bodropped inacorner o[the lot, Thank you for considering our request. Please direct any questions to Rick Odgers at 612.356.1353 or via email at rickoPvvildadveotorarmce,cwmn. A CORE) CERTRCATE OF LUX IL TY INSURANCE 5/22/2012 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED. subject to the terms and conditions of the policy. certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in lieu of such endorsement(sj. PRODUCER McKay Insurance Agency, Inc. 106 East Main Street P 0 Box 151 Knoxville IA 50138 INSURED Silent Sports Association - AR Series Wild Adventure Race, LLC 8839 Tyler Street NE DATE iMr.V00/YYYY1 glirr'T Meg Carruthers Tim F„,, (641)842-2135 (6.111828-20:3 E-MAIL SS•mcarruthers@mckayinsagency .com ADDRE INSURER(51 AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC INSURER A -LeXirlgt011 IIISUranCe Company 19437 INSURER I INSURER C: I INSURER D t INSURER E Blaine MN 55434 I INSURER F ' COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBERCL1252227676 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CER-iFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTvVITHSTANDING ANY REC.IUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR 017-:ER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICI-i THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS'. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE B.EEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, -- . INSR ' IADDL WISH: i. POLICY EFF POLICY EXP , LTR , TYPE OF INSURANCE !INSR Wvn ! POLICY NUMBER .1 IMMIUDNYYYI IMWD0NYYY), LIMITS ;EACH OCCURRERCE :'. 1,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABIL:7' I '7,i,A.Z13_;t II -I.:'_ R,F.r:,,TFr: , is c ,:-.. nc,,orrenre: $ 100,000 CLAIMLEr-mADE LX ! 0,7C,iF, X 9472463 i MED EX', 1,..ny one perSonl $ Excluded , X Includes Athletic I t,-E!SDNAL a :k0V INJURY $ 1,000,000 Participants 1 I GENERAL AGGREGATE :, 2,000,000 I i PROOL,CTF - CONIr'fOr' AGI,, 2,000,000 A GENERAL LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER; ; POL X ! LOS: ' AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Ar.P;' AJTO. , t ALI, OWNED • ; SE1'HEDLILEIE.: ''• , a'...cr05 L.,_,..; AUTOS 1 , NON -OWNED HIRE:: AUTOS , ;' AUTOE r • .. UMBRELLA LIAB X OCCUr, A x EXCESS LIAB RETFNTiON WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LL581L1T7 Y/N1 ANY PROPRIETOR;PARTNERIEXE:$11TIVE ; OFF-lc:E.:VI:EMBER EXCLUDEL1', IMandalory in NH) n yet,. dascrme unde° DES0RIP110,. Cr, 0PER4-r roNs • • N/A i9472463 6/2/2012 6/3/2012 6/2/2012 6/3/2012 ;;;;;;• SC.`,1,1BINED SINGLE L11,1;1' • .1(Entlecmen1: I -7: ErJOILV /*JJURY (Pe' nerson': fp BOD!IX iNJURV (Per J.:I:Jew); $ ; PROPERTY DAMAGE ( (Pe' ac:oent` I EACH OCCL,RRENZE AG',:giEGATE WC STAnk 10T1-4- E E;--CH ACC:JO:ENT E.1LSEAS - EA EMPLO‘'EE E.C;SE/1SE - P0LJE-.1$ Ith/ST $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES lAtiach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, h more space is reouired) Spring Sprint 3-Hour Adventure Race: June 2, 2012. Certificate holder is an additional insured but only with respect to liability arising out of the operations of the above named insured. This policy is issued, pursuant to Iowa code section 515.147, by a nonadmitted company in Iowa and as such is not covered by the Iowa Insurance Guaranty Association." CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OPINE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS Washington County 1515 Keats Avenue N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 ACORD 25 (2010/05) INS025 /7ni,n.,: 51 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Scott Ziller/MEG Cc' 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ArriPr. namo ond ar. rtanictcarcarl rnnrlrcrrf tirsnian AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 9 Speak Your Peace — Resolution Adopting the 9 Tools of Civility as Principles of Conduct Alyssa MacLeod, Taxpayer Relations and Communications Coordinator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED 0 ER OF BUSINESS: - Introductionof Item ..................... ........ ..... ...... . ..... .......... ....... Staff Report/Presentation......... ....... . ........ ..................... ..... ........ .......... ......... Staff Questions from Council to Staff ......... ..... ....... ........................ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate ..... ................ ............. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...... ............ ..... ..... ....... Mayor & City Council - Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ........ ............................................................... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED.: As part of Lake Elmo's Speak Your Peace Civility Project, the City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Resolution No. 2013-28, to incorporate the nine tools of civility as the foundational principles of conducting the business of the council. Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-28, with the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-28 adopting the nine tools of civility" BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Speak Your Peace is a campaign focused on improving civil discourse through raising awareness of nine tools of civility (basic principles of respect). The nine tools of civility are Pay attention: Listen; Be inclusive; Do not gossip; Show respect; Be agreeable; Apologize; Give constructive criticism; and Take responsibility. The original Speak Your Peace Civility Project was founded in 2003 in the Duluth Superior area. The City of Lake Elmo is adopting the project, starting with the nine tools of civility, to increase and improve civic engagement within the community, and cultivate a local governing environment that is conducive to effective and informed decision making. The campaign will be led by City staff and council, in collaboration with other community leaders. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-28 to adopt the nine tools of civility as part of the Lake Elmo Speak Your Peace campaign, with the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-28 adopting the nine tools of civility" ATTACHMENT: . Resolution No. 2013-28 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE NINE RULES OF CIVILITY WHEREAS, the residents of the city of Lake Elmo place a high value on respect and civility in their lives and they understand that these characteristics are essential to any healthy community; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council supports opportunities for civil discourse and discussion in the community and at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the city council sometimes addresses controversial issues about which people often feel passionately, which at times leads to uncivil behavior; and WHEREAS, an atmosphere of incivility and disrespect can have a damaging eff n the proceedings, on the quality of debate, and on the practice of dernocracy itself; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council recognizes nine tools of civility that will provide increased opportunities for civil discourse in order to find positive resolutions to the issues that face our city. These tools include: ect o (a) Pay attention; (b) Listen; (c) Be inclusive; (d) Do not gossip; (e) Show respect; (f) Be agreeable; (g) Apologize; (h) Give constructive criticism; (i) Take responsibility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council shall promote the use and adherence of these tools in conducting the business of the council. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-28 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 REGULAR ITEM #: 10 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Consider Approval of a New Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company Located at 3511 Lake Elmo Avenue North. SUBMITTED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item....................... ..... .................... ....... ......... ..... ................... City Clerk Questions from Council to Staff, if any. ....... ...... ...... ...........Mayor Facilitates Public Hearing. ..... . ........... ..... . ....... ...... ......... . ...... ........................Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ........ ........ . ........... ..... ..... . ....... ..... ...Mayor & City Council Discussion, if any ................... ..... ....... .................. .......... . ....... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ........ ........................................... ...... ............. .Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY & ACTION REOUESTED: It is respectfully requested that the City Council approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company, located at 3511 Lake Elmo Avenue North by applicant Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand LLC. Following the required public hearing, staffrecommends Council approve the application by taking the following action: "Move to approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at 3511 Lake Elnzo Ave. North to Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand, LLC., pending approval by the Washington County Sheriff" BACKGROUND & STAFF REPORT: The City previously has granted, and renewed every year since, an Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at the same location to Kim Ommerbom, the current owner of Lake Elmo Wine Co. For personal reasons, Ms. Omrnerborn is selling the business to Calvin Wilkens, owner of 5 Grand. LLC. Mr. Wilkens is asking that the Off -Sale License he transferred to his company. He is retaining the assumed name Lake Elmo Wine Company and plans to continue to operate the shop as is. The City has received the completed application, associated fees, and proof of insurance. Approval by the Washington County Sheriff is still pending. RECOMMENDATION: As the application is in order, staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company by taking the following action: "Move to approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at 3511 Lake Elmo Ave. North to Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand, LLC., pending approval by the Washington County Sheriff" ATTACHMENT(S): None (a copy of the Application is on file for review 2 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 11 AGENDA ITEM: Minnesota Investment Fund Application for Valley Cartage Group, Inc. - Resolution Authorizing City of Lake Elmo to Apply for MIF dollars SUBMITTED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introductionof Item... ....... ......................... ....... ....... ..... ....... ........ Staff Report/Presentation.............. ..... ................ ... Staff Questions from Council to ......... ..... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate.......... ....... ................. ........... . ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion............... ..... ..... ......... Mayor & City Council Discussion.. ........... ....... ............ ........ ............ Mayor & City Council Action on Motion.... ........ ............. ................................. Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Lake Elmo City Council will be asked to approve a Resolution allowing the City of Lake Elmo to apply for a forgivable loan from the Minnesota Investment Fund on behalf of Valley Cartage Group, Inc. Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution by taking the following action: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-29., A uthorizing an Application to the State of Minnesota Financing Program, the Minnesota Investment Fund, in the Amount of up to $500,000 Pr Valle), Cartage Group, Inc." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Minnesota Investment Fund provides financing to help add new workers and retain high - quality jobs on a statewide basis. The focus is on industrial, manufacturing, and technology - related industries to increase the local and state tax base and improve economic vitality statewide. Funds are awarded to local units of government who provide loans to assist expanding businesses. Cities, counties, townships, and recognized Indian tribal governments are eligible for this fund. All projects must meet minimum criteria for private investment, number of jobs created or retained, and wages paid. There is a maximum of 8500,000 per project. Only one award per state fiscal year may be provided to a government unit. At least 50 percent of total project costs must be privately financed through owner equity and other lending sources. Valley Cartage Group, Inc., a Wisconsin based company, will occupy the first floor of a building located at 8665 Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota for the purpose of expanding their transportation and logistics company. The facility will be used as a corporate headquarters and the office of the sales and logistics components of a full -service transportation company. It is expected that up to 50 new jobs will be created in the state of Minnesota. The jobs are expected to generate an annual payroll of $2.5 million and have an estimated impact of $12 million on the local economy. The range of average annual earnings per job is expected to be 830,000-$92,000, with an average of approximately $50,000. The building will be owned by a real estate holding company, Norman James LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company and leased to Valley Cartage Group, Inc. STAFF REPORT: The Minnesota Investment Fund is a great tool used by cities to aid in business and economic development. It helps provide incentives for companies outside of Minnesota to locate in our state. The loans are attractive to businesses because they are offered up front and can be used to offset capital expenditures — often equipment purchases. Over the last 8 years, the program has funded 53 projects, creating thousands of new, good -paying jobs across Minnesota. The City of Lake Elmo and Washington County have also passed Resolutions allowing property tax abatement for the property owned by Norman James, LLC (8665 Hudson Boulevard), in order to incentivize Valley Cartage Group, Inc. to expand its business into Minnesota. In addition to the money from the Minnesota Investment Fund and the property tax abatement, City staff has taken the lead and worked closely with Governor Dayton, our legislative representatives, MnDEED, Washington County, Greater MSP, and Xcel to put together an economic development package that will also include job training funds and energy credits which have further enticed Valley Cartage Group, Inc. to expand into Minnesota. 2 REcOMMENDATION: Based on the preceding information, the staff recommends the following: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-29, Authorizing an Application to the State of Minnesota Financing Program, the Minnesota Investment Fund, in the Amount of up to $500,000 fin. Valley Cartage Group, Inc." ATTACHMENTS; . Resolution No. 2013-29 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-29 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FINANCING PROGRAM, THE MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND, IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $500,000 FOR VALLEY CARTAGE GROUP INC. BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo act as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the Local Government Information Form to be submitted on or about April 17, 2013, and that Beckic Gumatz and Dean Zuleger are hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Lake Elmo. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has not incurred any costs and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has not violated any Federal. State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Lake Elmo may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above -referenced project(s), and that the City of Lake Elmo certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements and described on the Compliance Section of the Local Government Information Form. AS APPLICABLE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has obtained credit reports and credit information from Valley Cartage Group Inc. and Jeffrey Buelow. its CFO/CIO. Upon review by the City of Lake Elmo and Applicant's Legal Counsel, no adverse findings or concerns regarding, but not limited to, tax liens, judgments, court actions, and filings vsrith state, federal and other regulatory agencies were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse inforniation could result in revocation or other legal action. Resolution No. 2013-29 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Beckie Gumatz and Dean Zuleger, or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-19 11 11 (Tr:KEPIMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: AYOR & COUNCIL CO UNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION 04/16 013 Ordinance No.08-074 Amending 97.21 Watercraft and Water Surface Regulations, 97.22 Winter Lake Use Regulations and 97.23 Prohibited Structures and Uses Dean Zuleger, City Administrator at the request of Council Member Park & Council Member Bloyer Mayor Michael Pearson Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ()RI)ER OF' BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ..... City Administrator Report/Presentation.. „ ....... ...... ..... Administrator Questions from Council to Mayor Facilitates Public Comment Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion ......., ..... ................................ ....... .......... ..... Mayor & City Council Action on ...... ...... ..................... Mayor 1-7aeilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: To approve amendments to City Ordinances regulating watercraft regulations (ss 97.21), winter lake use regulations (ss 97.22) and prohibited structures and uses (ss 97.23). The amendments (attached) strive to expand the use of Lake Elmo lakes (Lake Elmo, Olson Lake, Lake Demontreville, Lake Jane) within current baseline MNDNR lake rules that apply to over 11,835 lakes across the State. Language that will not be changed include the establishment of an Ordinary High Water mark (OHW) that will prohibit wake creating activities if exceeded on Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville and the maintenance of a no wake, buoy marked channel between Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As a follow-up to ordinance changes approved in July 2012, (2) members of the City Council have requested further modifications that would eliminate wake creating time restrictions on all -- page City Council Meeting April 16. 2013 lakes, counter -clockwise travel on lakes when creating wakes, and certain other local lake use regulations that are more restrictive than MNDNR standards currently applied on over 11,835 lakes in the State of Minnesota. STAFF REPORT: During the summer of 2011 & winter of 2012. staff worked with the MNDNR to craft an ordinance that would meet with all party's approval. Specifically, MNDNR did not want to specify a specific elevation level for no wake imposition on Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville and they wished to make the City Code consistent with MN Statute 86 — governing motorized water craft operation. After several months of MNDNR review and text changes, staff brought a draft ordinance to the City Council for their review on June 5, 2012. At this time several lake shore residents expressed their dislike for the draft as they felt that the statutory norrning that took place defeated the intent and purpose of the ordinance. It was agreed that the City Administrator and members of the Tri-Lakes association would meet with MNDNR officials to discuss specific concerns about lake elevation levels and a provision of state statutes that creates a slow, no wake speed for personal watercraft within 150 feet of shoreline. A delegation from Lake Elmo consisting of Mayor Dean Johnston, Administrator Dean Zuleger, Tri-Lakes President Justin Bloyer and Lake Olson Association President Roger Johnson met with MNDNR's Kim Elverum, Boat & Water Safety Coordinator, to broker a compromise and clarify whether MN Statute 86 had preemption over local ordinances. At this meeting, it was agreed that if MNDNR technical staff agreed to the specific lake level definition of 929.7, the ordinance passed in July 2011 could stand permanently. The City Administrator spoke with MDNR technical staff (Schodeen) who had no objections to a pre-deten-nined ordinary high water mark of 929.7 (MSL). In the meeting with Elverum, it was noted that the MN Statute 86B.313 ("the 150' rule") is specifically directed at personal water craft — jet skis, water bikes, et al — and not traditional motorboats. This statute did preempt local ordinances for safety purposes. Appropriate changes were made to the ordinance and were reviewed by Mr. Roger Johnson, Mr. Justin Bloyer and Mayor Dean Johnson for approval prior to final drafting. In July of 2012, the City of Lake Elmo and affected land owners residing on the shores of Lake Olson, Lake Demontreville and Lake Jane crafted an amendment to current city code that would regulate the use of three lakes in the area known as the Tri-Lake area of the City of Lake Elmo. After considerable debate, the parties reached a consensus on three main areas: A slow, no wake speed condition be set if the lake level of 929.7 feet above sea level is exceeded for five consecutive days for Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville; 7. Motorboat operation that causes wake may be allowed on Lake Jane between 9:00 AM and sunset; 3. Motorboat races, tournaments et al are allowed only as specifically authorized by State Statutes and Rules, the Washington County Sheriff, and City Council. Notice shall be provided to the City Council. 2 City Council Meeting April 16. 2013 The City Council adopted these changes in July 2012, but the issue has been fraught with anxiety and high emotion as lakeshore owners wrestle with the important issues regarding, what is essentially, their backyard. Efforts over the years to determine the appropriate wake related use (especially time restrictions) have resulted in neighborhood surveys, long deliberations by the respective homeowner's associations, a degree of personal invective, and exploration of additional changes that include but are not limited to eliminating wake on the lakes altogether. In the March of 2013, two City Council Members requested that the City's current lake use ordinances be modified yet again to create an expansion of use allowed under MNDNR statutes for the purpose of more hours for wake creation a better ability to enforce proper use, and to allow additional time for lakeshore owners to use their "backyard" before the lakes are congested via use by the general public. The request came late at the March 5th City Council Meeting. Since the request and at the time of this writing, City staff has received 27 (out of 290 affected property owners) phone calls, emails, letters and personal visits from lakeshore owners regarding the issue. 17 responses were from Olson Lake / Lake Demontreville owners - where 10 responses were against any change and 8 responses were for the change. In addition, the Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville Homeowner's Association took a formal Board of Directors vote at their April 11, 2013 spring meeting that resulted in a 7-5 vote to not change the current ordinance. The largest land owner (albeit not a property tax payer) the Jesuit Retreat / Carmelite Monastery has also sent 2 pieces of correspondence stating their opposition to the current proposed changes mainly due to privacy / trespass concerns related to the solitary nature of their operations. A 2011 survey of these two lakes revealed that 70% of lake owners fundamentally support a noon time restriction — although the validity of the survey has been routinely questioned. The results of this survey may be presented at the Council Meeting. 5 responses were from Lake Jane land owners where the 9 AM change has been in effect for one use season. 4 were in favor of the proposed ordinance and 1 was opposed out of a concern for the loon population on the lake. 3 responses came from Lake Elmo, all in favor of the changes. One response came from a non -Lake Elmo resident (Stillwater fisherman). The total tally for the proposed change (via response to City Hall) was 15 for the change and 11 against the change with 904)/0 from Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville. An informational flyer, vvebsite / Facebook posting were distributed to all affected landowners on April Nth, 2013 that may produce more response that will be presented at the April 16"City Council meeting. The flyer used a word, "alignment", that is highly interpretive and may have led some to believe that the current ordinance is not approved by the MNDNR. A more appropriate way to explain the change would be that the ordinance would be expanding lake use in alignment with the general guidelines of the MNDNR. This word will be clarified at the meeting. City Council Meeting April 16, 2013 KEY ISSUES: During the course of the preliminary public comment on the proposed amendment five policy key issues have been identified: Increased wake creating public access to the lakes will make it difficult for lake shore owners to enjoy peace and quiet, especially on the weekends; 2. Current wake restrictions make it difficult for lake shore owners to safely use the lake for their own activities due to the compressed usage time and competition from the general public for lake use; Longer periods of unrestricted, wake creating, lake usage will increase the probability of the introduction of invasive species to Lake Elmo lakes; 4. The two varied time restrictions of wake creation create an enforceability problem from Washington County law enforcement; 5. Increased wake may compound shore land erosion problems. In addition, a few ancillary issues have been identified that include property trespass. boat ramp access/ abuse and operating while intoxicated. The specifics of these issues will be discussed with Washington County Sheriff s Department. From an economic / property value standpoint several land owners have expressed concern that the time restrictions will make it difficult for them to sell their homes — this has been confirmed by a discussion with two realtors who specialize in lake home sales in the metro areas. The point was amplified by two Olson Lake residents who expressed disappointment in the fact that they did not know of the restrictions when purchasing their homes and would not have done so, if they had known the restrictions. RELATIONSHIPS: There is one point of commonality in the ongoing lake use debate and that is the basic fact that lake shore property owners are weary of the ongoing discussion which causes division and anxiety. Parties on both side of the debate have expressed some regret that issue has been brought up again and simply desire peace in their neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the background information, a review of key issues, discussion with past & present MNDNR staff, discussion with lake shore owners, and a policy of property use equity, the staff recommends that the City of Lake Ehno City Council: Motion: Approve Ordinance 08-074, to amend 97.21 of the City Code regulating watercraft and water surface regulations. 97.22 winter lake use regulations and 97.23 (L) prohibited structures and uses as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 08-074 4 City mfLake Elmo Ordinance 08-074(Proposed) ' (Re -Created and Amended to Read As Follows) FT AND WATER SURFACE USE REGULATIONS. Tile followin2 reoulations shall apply to the use of watercraft oil lakes entirely within the c1tv limits. to tile use of a lake entirely within the citN limits. and to tile use of ice surfaces oil lakes entirely within the city limits. (A) Hours ofol)eration-. (|) Nhro,u/cond//oms. Noperson shall operate any, motorboat s¢uspeed greater than o slow, no -wake speed as defined by M.S. 8 8613,005 between sunset and sunrise tile foUovvinL, day. (Z) /{i'h omoy' condii.ions. No person shall operate any motorboat at greater than u x|o`+, no -wake speed as defined by M.S. 6 868.005 whenever the lake |cvc) of Lakes Olson and 0ennon1rcri||e is uhnvc 929.7 ftc1 above sea |nvc| (MSL) [b,five consecutive days. This restriction will remain in effect until the water level drops below 929.7feet, and o:/nuioaihcrc for five consecutive days. (B) ions, Noperson sbu|| operate any watercraft in violation of the provisions ofthis code. or in violation V[ihc provisions u[M.8. Chapter 868or Minnesota Boat and Water Sefc1yRules (6||U.0lO0'6||0.2]O0)which statutes and rules are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. In the event o[mconflict between the various city and state nc�o|etionu'themore restrictive reaulation shall apply. ([,) pcnnoncn/ ' slow - no xn6e: oreus The channels and narrows 6cLv/cen Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville are hereby designated as permanent -slow - no wake" areas and appropriate signs orbuoys meeting the specifications found inMinn. Rules 6ll0.|5O0shall be posted. (/\nn.Ord. Y7-|jU.passed 3-\-2005�Aon.Ord. 08'0|4,passed 5-|q-2O09,Am. Ord. A0'050, passed 7-l9-20ll:Am. Ord. V8-j0,passed ||-l-2U|):/\no. Ord. 2012-5B'passed 7'17- � (Re-created and Amended to Read As � @97.22 WINTER LAKE USE REGULATIONS. (A) Clean-up Ice house owners are responsible for clean-up oftrash vwhhinZ5 feet of tile (B) Ice fishing holes. No person shall leave holes in the lake larger than I foot in diameter unless the holes are visibly marked for day and night. (C .) Fires. No person shall have an open fire on the ice surface of a lake. (1997 Code, § 1380.04) ! (97.23 is Proposed to Be Stricken in its Entirety) Coune-it (5) ki-Htny-a-nc.-41-1-afeF-o-r 41997 ('ode. § 1380.06) (Am. OR1. 2012 58, 1tt4sed 7 17 2012 Marc staff.to time re considc gove alio (6no Noise / Disorderly Lake El Longest governed la Elmo e m ake -Impacted by Lake Elmo Park Reserve 250,000 visitors per year - most boat landing parking Lake Issues: Milfoil/Invasive Species - Shoreland Erosion - Sunset Enforcement Wakeboard Noise Public Input: 13 for No Change 3 for Change Property Owner Survey: 53/54 surveyed for No Change **8 not surveyed (Treml Constance 6517797803 p.1 Faxing 2 pages including this page: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Citv of Lake Elmo April 16, 2013 Dear Dean, Would you please make a copy of this letter, "Public Record". Thank you Regards, Constance Northrup 651-278-8196 FAX 651-779-7803 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: ORDINANCE AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of Revised Zoning Map SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Director of Planning THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Nick Johnson, City Planner 04/16/2013 13 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of ..... ............ ........... ........... ..... Staff Report/Presentation...... ..... .............. ...... ..... ....... Staff Questions from Council to Staff.......... ...... ......... ......... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate.................. ...... ....... ..... ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ....... ....... ..... ..... ......... ..... Mayor & City Council Discussion......................... ...... ..... ........ ........ Mayor & City Council Action on ........ .......... ......... Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT The Lake Elmo Zoning Map must be updated to be in compliance with the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendment for the 1-94 Corridor. SUMMARY ANp.ACT1ON REOUESTED: The City Council is being asked to adopt a revised Zoning Map for the City that incorporates the new Zoning Districts that have been approved as part of the Council's ongoing work to update the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed map incorporates all of the newly created zoning districts, but also leaves some of the existing categories in tact pending future amendments. Staff will be bringing forward further amendments to the Map once the Village Land Use Plan has been formally adopted by the City Council. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a revised Zoning Map for the City of Lake Elmo and take the following action / with the following motion: "Move to adopt Ordinance 08-075 amending Chapter. 154 of the City Code by adopting a new official Zoning District Map" BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: The Zoning Map serves as the key piece of the City's zoning regulations since it is the official document that designates the zoning district for any given property in the community. The zoning map also serves as the primary mechanism for implementing the Comprehensive Plan for the City, and this map is required to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with State Statutes. With the recent adoption of the revised land use plan for the 1-94 Corridor, Staff is recommending that the City Council The Zoning Map now includes a revised municipal boundary that incorporates the northeast area detachment. The resulting parcel boundary includes a small parcel that retains the previous A Agriculture zoning in this area. • Parcels that were zoned Limited Business have been changed to LC Neighborhood Office/Limited Commercial. • The LDR, HDR, and VMX districts are listed as new districts, but do not yet show up on the map. Staff is recommending that the zoning within the future sewer service areas be addressed at the time subdivisions or other developments are proposed. As an alternative, the City may elect to rezone parcels in conjunction with public projects that extend sewer and water services into these areas. Staff will continue to revisit the Zoning Map as future text amendinents are considered by the Council, and will also be bringing back further amendments to the map later this summer after the Village land use plan has been formally adopted by the City. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Zoning Map amendment at its April 8, 2013 meeting. There were no public comments received concerning the map revisions, and the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the map as presented. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information, Staff report and Planning Commission recommendation. it is recommended that the City Council adopt the revised Zoning Map with the following motion: "Move to adopt Ordinance 08-075 amending Chapter 154 of the City Code by adopting a new official Zoning District Map" ATTACHMENT(S),: I. Ordinance 08-075 1. Exhibit "A'. — Lake Elmo Zoning Map MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment — Tree Preservation Ordinance SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Kyle Klatt, Planning Director 04/16/2013 14 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of ..... ....... . ..... Staff Report/Presentation........... ................ ...... Questions from Council to Staff.......... ........... ........ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate .......... .................... ................ ......... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion................. ...... ...... ..... Mayor & City Council ........ ..... ...... ..... Mayor & City Council - Action on Motion.. ..... .......... ........ ..... ........ ........ Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is asked to consider a Zoning Text Amendment to adopt a Tree Preservation Ordinance as part of Article 6 — Environmental Performance Standards. The City Code currently does not contain any requirements related to tree preservation within development and grading activities. This Zoning Text Amendment is part of the ongoing effort to improve the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of future growth and development activity in Lake Elmo. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-076 through the following moti077: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-0 76, establishing standards for tree preservation within development and grading activities" In addition, Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-30, authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 08-076, througJi the lbllowing motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-30., authorizing summasy publication of Ordinance 08-0 76." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: In preparation of upcoming development activity in the community, Staff is working on a project intended to make incremental improvements to the Lake Elmo Zoning Code. While working on this project, Staff identified tree preservation or protection measures as an area of Zoning Code improvement. Ordinances related to tree preservation are common among communities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. In fact, Lake Elmo is one of few communities researched by Staff that does not employ provisions related to tree preservation or protection. There are a number of reasons that cities engage in tree of Woodbury, do not count tree replacement towards landscaping requirements. For further comparisons, please reference the comparison chart in attachment #3. Finally, making use of a similar preservation approach that is utilized in Woodbury offers two benefits; I) utilizing a similar strategy or approach offers applicants the benefit of continuity and working from an established standard; 2) The fact that this approach is utilized in Woodbury demonstrates that the procedure and requirements have not been a hindrance to development activity. It should be noted that the proposed ordinance and Woodbury's ordinance do include some minor differences, including: Woodbury's replacement schedule includes lower amounts of replacement for conunon (14 replacement) and coniferous (1/4 replacement) trees, However, given how tree removals are tallied in both ordinances, it is less likely that common and coniferous trees will be replaced than deciduous hardwood trees. Both ordinances place a higher priority on hardwood deciduous trees. • Woodbury's ordinance includes provisions for non -developing properties. Given the rural nature of the Lake Elmo community, Staff recommends to leave non -developing properties out of tree preservation requirements. It is the goal of the Tree Preservation Ordinance to minimize and mitigate tree loss during development and grading activities. Measures related to tree preservation and protection have become established practice in development activity in the Twin cities Metropolitan Area and beyond. Given that Lake Elmo is a Tree City USA (11`11 year) and has excellent natural resources, some form of tree preservation or protection is recommended in advance of future development activity. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-076 through the ,f011owing motion: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-076, establishing srandardsJor tree preservation within development and grading activities" In addition, Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No, 2013-30, authorLing summaly publication of Ordinance 08-076, through the fillowitm motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-30, authorizing summaty publication of Ordinance 08-076." ATTACEIMENT(S): 1 Ordinance 08-076 1. Resolution No. 2013-30 3. Tree Preservation Ordinance Comparison Chart Diameter Breast Height (DBUf). The diameter of trees at breast height, measured 1/2 feet (54 inches) above the ground. Drip Line. The farthest distance away from the trunk ofutree that rain ordew will fall directly to the ground from the leaves or the branches of the tree. Nuisance Tree. (1) Any living or standing tree or part thereof infected to any degree with a shade tree disease orshade tree pest; (2)Any Logs, stumps' branches, firewood or other part of dead or dying tree(s) infected with a shade tree disease orshade tree pest unless property treated; and (3) Any standing dead trees or limbs which may threaten human health or property. Shade Tree Disease. Dutch elm disease (UphiosLomn uimi orOphiostoma novo uimi), oak wilt ([eratocystis fagaccarum) orany other tree disease of epidemic nature. Significant Tree 4healthy tree measuring a minimum of six (6) inches in diameter for hardwood deciduous trees, eight (8) inches in diameter for coniferous/ evergreen trees' or twelve (1I) inches in diameter for common trees, as defined herein. Specimen Tree. A healthy tree measuring equal Luorgreater than thirty (30) inches in diameter breast height, Tree Preservation Plan. A plan prepared by certified forester or landscape architect indicating all ofthe significant trees inthe proposed development orparcel. The Tree Preservation Plan includes a tree inventory which includes the size, species and location of all significant trees proposed tobesaved and removed on the area ofdevelopment, and the measures proposed to protect the significant trees to be saved. C. Tree Preservation Standards for Developing Properties 1. Applicability. a. 4Tnee Preservation Plan shall be submitted and approved for the following activities: i. New Development /n Any Zoning District. 4Tree Preservation Plan shall be required aspart ofany development orsubdivision application. ii. Any grading o,excavation project that result inthe movement nfgreater than 400 cubic yards ofmaterial per acre ofsite per 8151.O17. b. 4Tree Preservation Plan is not required for the following activities: i. This section does not apply tothe issuance o{adevelopment approval for asingle- family residenceon an existing platted lot ofrecord. ii. This section does not apply tothe harvesting of trees. For purposes ofthis section, "harvesting" means cutting orclearing trees for purposes relating toforestry operations, asdefined in§l54.O12. ''Han/esting"does not include the clearing of land for the purposes of development, even where the trees are sold for purposes of creating lumber for related purposes. 2. Tree Preservation Plan. 4U applicants shall submit a tree preservation plan prepared by certified forester or landscape architect in accordance with the provisions of this section. During the review ofan application for a building permit, grading permit orPreliminary Plat, the tree preservation plan wit[ bereviewed according tothe best layout topreserve significant trees and the efforts of the subdivider to mitigate damage to significant trees. 3. Tree Preservation Plan Requirements. The Tree Preservation Pion shalt bea separate plan sheet(s)that includes the following information: a. The name(s), certification Is), telephone number(s) and address(es) of the person(s) responsible for tree preservation during the course ofthe development project. 2 b. Tree Inventory. The Tree Preservation Plan must include aTree Inventory through one of the following methods: i. Tree Inventory Individual. An individual inventory including on identification system linked to metal field tags located four and one-half (4.5) feet from grade on all significant trees. The quantity, size species' health and location of at[ significant trees must beidentified on a plan sheet in both graphic and tabular form. ii. Tree Inventory Sampling. In cases ofsites with Large tracts ofsignificant trees, the City may approve the use of a sampling inventory for all or portions of a site as an alternative tuanindividual inventory. The sampling inventory must include the methodology for sampling, identification ribbon around the perimeter ofthe sampling areas, and metal field tags located four and one-half (4.5)feet from grade onall significant trees inthe sampling area. Within the sampling area, the quantity, size, specics, health and Location of all significant trees must be identified unaplan sheet inboth graphic and tabular form. Based onsampling, total estimates and locations ofhealthy significant trees shall be provided. iii. Tree Inventory Combination. With the approval ofthe City, sites that include both Large tracts nfsignificant trees and areas ofindividual significant trees may utilize acombination ofthe individual and sampling inventory methods. c. Trees that were planted as part ofa commercial business such as tree farm or nursery do not need to be inventoried on an individual tree basis. A general description of the trees and an outer boundary of the planted area must be provided. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to provide evidence to support the finding that the trees were planted as part of commercial business. d. Alisting ofhealthy significant trees inventoried insubsection (b)above. Dead, diseased ordying trees donot need tnbeincluded inthe totals. e. 4 Listing nfthe healthy significant trees removed, identified by the metal field tag or some other form of identification used in the tree inventory in subsection (b) above. f. A Listing ofthe healthy significant trees to remain, identified bythe metal field tag or some other form of identification used in the tree inventory in subsection (b) above, gOuter boundary ofall contiguous wooded areas, with a general description of trees not meeting the significant tree size threshold. h. Locations of the proposed buUdings, structures, orimpervious surfaces. i. Delineation nfall areas tobegraded and limits of[and disturbance. j. Identification ofall significant trees proposed to be removed within the construction area. These significant trees should be identified in both graphic and tabular form. k. Measures to protect significant trees. L. Size, species' number and Location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted on the property in accordance with the Mitigation Plan, if necessary. m. Signature of the person(s) preparing the plan. 4. Implementation. All sites shalt bpstaked, as depicted in the approved Tree Preservation Plan, and the required tree protection fencing shalt beinstalled around the critical root zone before land disturbance isLncommence. The City shall inspect the construction site prior tothe beginning of the land disturbance to ensure that protective fencing and other protective measures are in place. No encroachment, land disturbance, trenching, filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry shall occur within the fenced areas protecting the critical root zone of the trees tobesaved, 5. Allowable Tree Removal. Uptothirty (30) percent ofthe diameter inches of significant trees on any parcel of land being developed maybe removed without replacement requirements. Replacement according tothe Tree Replacement Schedule isrequired when removal exceeds more than thirty (jD) percent ofthe total significant tree diameter inches. The following types oftrees do not need to be included as part ofthe tally oftree a. Dead, diseased ordying trees; b. Trees that are transplanted from the site to another appropriate area within the city; c. Trees that were planted as part ofa commercial business, such as tree farm or nursery; or d. Trees that were planted by the current property owner, In making such a determination, the City shalt consider consistency nfthe age of the trees' any patterns in the location of trees, historical aerial photography and evidence o/intentional planting such msinvoices, formal planting plans urcost sharing agreements. 6. Mitigation Plan. a. In any development or grading project where the allowable tree removal is exceeded, the applicant shalt mitigate the tree toss byeither: i. Planting replacement trees in appropriate areas within the development in accordance with the Tree Replacement Schedule; ii. Planting replacement trees on City property under the direction of the Public Works Superintendent; or iii. Some combination of above subsections (i) and (ii) to total the equivalent number ofreplacement trees to meet the Mitigation Plan. b. The form of mitigation to be provided by the applicant shall be determined by the City. C. d. The planting oftrees for mitigation onresidential projects shalt beinaddition to any other landscape requirements ofthe City. All trees, with the exception o/ornamental trees, planted as landscaping on commercial ormixed-use projects may becounted towards tree replacement requirements. 7. Tree Replacement [o/o//obons. Thirty (30) percent of the total diameter inches of significant trees onthe site may beremoved without replacement. The allowable thirty (30) percent removal isfirst credited tothe common trees removed, then the conifers, and lastly the hardwood species. The following calculation procedure must be used to determine tree replacement requirements: a. Tally the total number u/diameter inches ofsignificant trees on the site. b. Calculate thirty (30) percent ofthe total diameter inches ofsignificant trees on the site. This is the allowable tree removal limit, or the number of inches that can be removed without replacement. c. Tatty the total diameter inches ofcommon trees that will be removed and subtract this number from the allowable tree removal limit. 4 d. If there are any allowable inches left, tally the total diameter inches of conifer/evcrgreen tree species that will be removed and subtract this number from the remaining allowable inches. e. If there are any allowable inches left, tally the total diameter inches of hardwood deciduous tree species that will be removed and subtract this number from the remaining allowable inches. [ |fatany point in the above calculation procedure (a'e) the number of inches to be removed exceeds the thirty (]O) percent allowable removal limit, the remaining inches nfremoval above the allowable limit must bereplaced according tothe Tree Replacement Schedule insubsection 8. 8. Tree Replacement Schedule. Tree removals over the allowable tree removal timit on the parcel shall bereplaced according tothe following schedule: a. b. C. d. Common tree species shall be replaced with new trees at m rate ofone-fourth (1/4) the diameter inches removed. [onifenous/evergreen tree species shalt be replaced with new coniferous or evergreen trees at rate ofone-half ( /z) the diameter inches removed. Since coniferous species are often sold by height rather than diameter inch, the following conversion formula can beused: Height ofReplacement Coniferous Tnee/2~Diameter Inches ofCredit. Hardwood deciduous tree species shalt be replaced with new hardwood deciduous trees at rate ofone-half ('/z)the diameter inches removed. Replacement Tree Size, Replacement trees must beaminimum ofone (1)inch in diameter. V. Spec/es Requirement. The City must approve all species used for tree replacement. Ornamental trees are not acceptable for use a» replacement trees. Where ten or more replacement trees are nequired, not more than thirty (]O) percent of the replacement trees shall beofthe same species of tree. Native species are encouraged, and hardiness and salt tolerance should beconsidered where applicable. 10. Warranty Requirement. Any replacement tree which is not alive or heo|thy, as determined by the City, or which subsequently dies due to construction activity within two (2) years after the date o{project closure shalt be removed bythe applicant and replaced with o new healthy tree meeting the same minimum size requirements within eight (8) months of removoL 11. Protective Measures. The Tree Preservation Plan shall identify and require the following measures to be utilized to protect significant trees planned for preservation: m. Installation ofsnow fencing orpolyethylene laminate safety netting placed atthe drip line oratthe perimeter ofthe critical root zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees, specimen trees and significant woodlands Lobepreserved. Nograde change, construction activity' or storage of materials shalt occur within this fenced in area. b. Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1 . Any oak trees so pruned shalt be required to have any cut areas seated with an appropriate nontoxic tree wound sealant. c. Prevention ofchange in soil chemistry due toconcrete washout and leakage orspillage oftoxic materials, such asfuels orpaints. d. Removal of any nuisance trees located in areas to be preserved. 5 12. Compliance with the Tree Preservation Plan. The applicant shalt implement the Tree Preservation Pion prior to and during any construction. The tree protection measures shalt remain in place until aU land disturbance and construction activity is terminated or until a request to remove the tree protection measures is made to, and approved by, the City. a. No significant trees shalt be removed until a tree preservation plan is approved and except in accordance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. b. The City shalt have the right to inspect the development and/or building site in order todetermine compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. The City shalt determine whether the Tree Preservation Plan has been met. c. Irreparable Damage. Where the City determines that irreparable damage has occurred to healthy significant tree that is designated to be preserved as part ofthe Tree Preservation Plan, the tree shalt be removed and replaced, and protective fencing shalt be provided. U. Specimen Trees. The removal of any specimen trees on a property located in any of the urban zoning districts shalt require a special permit and be subject to the Tree Replacement Schedule for the purpose of mitigating great tree toss. E. Financial Security. in cases where mitigation or tree replacement is required, the City may require that afinancial security, in o form acceptable to the City, be provided as part ofo development agreement or applicable permit to ensure compliance and performance of the Mitigation Plan. The financial security wit[ be released to the applicant upon verification by the City that the Mitigation Plan was followed, and that aK replacement trees are planted and in n reasonable state o/ health. The financial security may be used to replace any replacement trees that have become damaged or diseased after planting. F. Exceptions 1. Exception Standards. Notwithstanding the City'sdesire toaccomplish tree preservation and protection goats, there may bcinstances where these goals are in conflict with other City objectives. These conflicts will most likely occur on small, henviLy'wooded parcels. At the discretion of the City Council, exceptions may be granted if all of the following conditions a. The subject parcel isfive (5)acres in size or less; b. It is not feasible tocombine the subject parcel with adjacent parcels that could use the parcel osrequired green space; c. Strict adherence tothe Tree Preservation Ordinance would prevent reasonable development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and desirable to the City onthe parcel; and d. The exception requested is the minimum needed to accomplish the desired development, I. Reduced Mitigation for Exceptions. |fanexception isgranted, relief from the requirements nfthe ordinance may take the form of reduced mitigation requircments, greater aKovvabie tree removal, higher thresholds for determining significant trees, or any combination of the above. The City Council wit[ determine which form of relief best balances the objectives of the City and tree preservation. SECTION 2. Effective Date, This ordinance shalt become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake E[DOO' 6 SECTION 3. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-076 was adopted on this sixteenth day of April 2013, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Cterk This Ordinance 08-076 was published on the day of . 2013. 7 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-030 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 08-076 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-076, an ordinance to the City's regulations pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading and WHEREAS, the ordinance is lengthy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, that the City Clerk shall cause the following; summary of Ordinance No. 08-076 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-076, which requires certain measures of tree preservation within development and major grading activities, including the following: Property owners or applicants engaging in development, subdivision or major grading activities must submit a Tree Preservation Plan; Property owners or applicants are allowed to remove up to 30% of the diameter inches of significant trees without requiring tree replacement. • When tree replacement is required, property owners or applicants must follow the Tree Replacement Schedule to calculate the required amount of replacement trees. The full text of Ordinance No. 08-076 is available for inspection at Lake Elmo city hall during regular business hours. Resolution No. 201330 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo that the City Administrator keep a copy of the ordinance at City Hall for public inspection and that a full copy of the ordinance he placed in a public location within the City. Dated: April 16, 2013. ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor Mike Pearson The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2013-30 Ordinance Proposed Ordinance (4'lG'l3) City of Woodbury City ufCottage Grove City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance Comparison Chart Tree preservation required for Allowed removal before single family replacement/mitigation home? 30% _ Depends nnLand Lbe^ Depends nnLand Use ^ City ofSt. Louis Park C% City dLake City Q% City of Medina Depends on Lot Size No Yes Notes: a: See Exhibit b:See Exhibit B c Greater replacement required for specimen trees d:See Exhibit [ eSee Exhibit D Tree Inventory required? Yes nrTree Inventory Sampling Yes Yes orTree Inventory Sampling Yes Yes No Yes Tree Tree Replacement Classification Schedule/Formula � Diameter Inches Replaced Common: 1/4rep|aced Coniferous: 112 replaced Standard Deciduous: 1/Zreplaced Standard Standard Standard Standard None Deciduous and Coniferous' | Diameter Inches Rao|aced Common: l/Qreplaced Coniferous: l/4replaced Deciduous: 112,ep|aced See Cottage Grove Tree replacement fulfills landscaping requirements? Special protections for Specimen Trees? Residential., No Commercial: Yes Yes Residential: No Commercial; Yes Yes No No- See Eagan Schedule' No Noc See St. Louis Park 5chedu|e° No Maintain existing density o(trees upLulV trees/acre No l:1caliper inch replacement No No No f:Tree removal permit required, but noreplacement necessary Q:See Exhibit E h: See Exhibit F i: Does not separate hardwood and softwood deciduous trees Exhibit A: Cottage Grove Allowed Tree Removal a. Single tot development: (i) Single unit residential. fi;enty percent (20%. (2) CornmerciaL industraL institutional and multi -unit residential, thirty percent 30%). b. Single phase. multi -tot development: (1) Single unit residential. forty percent (40). (2) Commercial, industrial, nstitLaional and multi -unit residential, fifty percent 50%) c. Two-phase development: (1) Initial site development. tenty five percent (25%). (2) Individual lot development: (A) Single unit residential, tenty percent (20%) 6) Comrnercial, industrial, institutional and multi -unit residential. thirty percent (30%), Exhibit B: Cottage Grove Tree Replacement Schedule Size QfQuaflfyiny Tree Damaged Or Destroved Category Coniferous: Category B Cateaory C 112 to 24 Ieethiah 24 feet or higher 2 4 Hard.00d deciduous: to less man2Cinches dbh 2010 less than 30 inches dbh Sctt;ood deciduous 1Greater than 24inches dbh 2 Specimen tree 3 4 ig 2 14 12 Per I.000 squire feel 6 Replacement Tree 1 Cateaory A Cateaory 8 Deciduous No less than 1 inches Coniferous No less than 12 feet Cateaory C No less than 2.5 No less than 1.5 inches inches No less than 6 feet No less than 4 feet Exhibit C: City of Eagan Allowed Tree Removal L) Al Io&i :I tie rernovdl. Tree J 1novc!i 2i Speciriien tree, iri ificorit lteii ond sii:iiiifr:;ont odId id reIi1cdoShall I:)e Iri o::ccircIince VIUi the cltv-oI) r:tve:1 tre 1:reeIvoti:li pIin ori: in rio cis the cilvioLlnt cif reiilcrvai xcee:I thla fo:.:inl pe:entnqs it itiie Ii:t i1IEiJCIiliinL iI)clIe-L1IiIt resiclentioL laercent. (1ciI1iErciot rind multiunit residntkiI. 30 percent. 1LJJtl-I:it de.'eIcI:uiient, ) SInc:lIe-ph3e developrreni rrocess. 'i Siriqle uiiit riAIeniinl, 41) peo::nt. (1:01 Uommeli::LiI nru) n)ultiunit resicleritinl, 475 r:'rcent. 2) T,o-i:ha e :ievelopment. IntinI site developmeiit. 25 percent. (00 1 Ir`lilivic1ual Ic,t development, (1 S1npie unit residentkil 20 percent C:iniiiierciit or multi -unit resdeiitioL 31) percent. Exhibit D: City of Eagan Tree Replacement Schedule Tree reploceiiierit, 1 lUr WER OF REPLM( E.\Ei IT TREES Size oi Tree [iiluised 'r LIetr:jed C teor; - (iator, 0 1: tor 0 0cidferou5, 12 to 2-1 feet high 1 2 Coniferous, 2-1 feet or higher 2 Hird .xd dcidous � ) 20 inclis chdreletcr 1 2 Hrd• od d&Lldoc,u5. 21 to 30 inches diimtr 2 -1 Soft' ocI deLlduous, 12 to 2-1 inches cIiiii-ter 1 2 Sort` oacl decld'jo',5 r€tr hn 2-4 inches 2 dirnter 5ecmeii tre Sz& rf /epicen?c tre:. :tCIF\ A tiee held :e IesS thin the f: Io',!Jrc1 izer 7 [)e cid uou trees. riot less tl"I�ln four nhes in diameter. :cIfE:rI trees;, not Ies thou 12 feet in height. (::te(1cr B trees r,oI l:lr no thrall thB fotlo'.viro :;iLes. Deci:1uou tres. not ess ihon and one-half IIICIIeS iri diamete 2. Ccniferous tres not thnn six fret in heiqht (::uteuory ( trees shoH :e no less thrill the folln»ing sizes: [)ciduous trees. not less than one and crehoif Innhes in iinie ter Coriiferous trees not Is than four feel in hijIit, Exhibit E: City of St. Louis Park Tree Replacement Schedule c Appriva1 of a peniiit tot' tilt? removal at any si-nificant tree or for land alteiation wlueh reu1t in tiee c1etruction shall be sublet to and conditioned upoii the owner 01' developer 1'ep!acin the 1os., or reasonably anticipatecl loss of all live si2nlficant tIee. I11e aiuount of tI'eeS to be pi,ovidec in iep!acement shall be detenniiied by the fo11owiir fornRila: (A 2O) x C L) Total diameter ui heS of sinific altei'atiou or i'etrioval. ees 10 a reu1t of li Total diameter inches of s1Qnifieant trees situated on the la Tree rel)laceluellt coitant (1 :i. ReiJlacement t1',_ e7 (numbei of calipei' iiche. Exhibit F: Citv af Medina Allowed Tree Removal Subd. 6 AI1owd Tree Reinovi1, 1 a T§« i11yvin 32mm1 :f Siiitiaiu iiiiv b fi:iu a ie mid ip1iein:u Ii1I n:r l: i1iiijl. 1iithj Sire DeveloPinent Ioa1 1:iiry i e. iii1uded in t1 CB3uaea:p1a iin i iifl1)icifl11 1 - 1 i -11ov::l pei ent of Ii dl iiI.1V I: 1''c 1 : 1 _1ct1viiie O(l1eF tiLan ltiiiial She 0 ev elop zii&iit Lot iz !.1 a 1 1-) is :j-11Nii aie A11OCd j:'ii1t 1 &) iiiitiit 1 i1i,t inav 1: 1 Eu aTi1[ie t1nt ni1ude the U)(I1\1jOfl cr pio1:etv i c1edit6on of 1:ib1i oi i i1it-of-vay. the ntiintei of Sinifi coot Iiee T11;t niv Jlliti1 S2= Dvlopi iu 1ia1I le base} cii rh lot izepiyt t: Su1:divii:n, trr Th 1:iopeltY i iil:i clividcd. §e 11vd niiin]i cf Si'iiifiant Iieateat in iniovcd l'ill b= base] on t1 nclividuaI 1ct with in t11C Sub :livi ion. KE 0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM /: MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment — Off -Street Parking and Loading SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Cornrnission Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: 04/16/2013 15 - Tntroduction of item .................................................................................................. Staff - Staff - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................ Mayor Facilitates Public lnput, ifAppropriate................................................................... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion.............................................................................. Mayor & City Council Discussion..................................................................................... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion................................................................................... Mayor Facilitates Report/Presentation........................... SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is asked to consider a Zoning Text Amendment, establishing standards for off-street parking and loading for all use classifications in Lake Elmo. The existing provisions related to off-street parking only address parking requirements for a lirnited number of use classifications in four specific zoning districts. This Zoning Text Amendment is part of the ongoing effort to reorganize and improve the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of future severed growth. The Planning Cominis,sion i-ecominends the City Council approl'e Ordinance 08-077 through the follrni'ing nzotion: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-077, establishing Off-street parking and loading requirements for all use classification in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code" 117 addition, Staff rec'oinnwnds that the Cit1° Council approve Resolution No. 2013-31, auihori:ing sunrnary publication of Ordinance 08-077, through the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-31, authorizing sunzrna,3'publication of Ordinance 08-077." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Staff is currently working on a large project aimed at incrementally reorganizing and improving the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of upcoming growth. This project began with the adoption of the urban residential and cornrnercial zoning districts in August of 2012. As Staff has worked to improve the Zoning Code, existing ordinances have been evaluated in tenis of effectiveness and organization. In this spirit, Staff evaluated the existing off-street parking regulations and found the standards 10 be incomplete and poorly organized. With the onset of future development, it is important to have clear and effective parking regulations, particularly for uses that have greater parking needs, such as coiurnercial and high density residential development. In order to organize the off-streei parking requirements in a sensible manner, Staff is proposing to set parking levels based upon use classification as opposed to zoning district. Use classifications are land use types, such as single family detached or restaurant, and can he found in § 154.012 of the Lake Elmo City Code. Therefore, these use classifications become the basis for the amount of off-street parking required in Lake Elmo, regardless of the zoning district. The Planning Comrnission reviewed the proposed Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance at a workshop meeting on March 25, 2013. At this meeting. the Planning Commission made sorne recornmendations related to minor adjustment of the ordinance. Staff responded to this request by making minor refinements. After an initial review, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance on April 8, 2013. No one spoke in favor or against the ordinance at the public hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the propose ordinance for approval. The Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance is intended to establish parking requirements for all use classifications in Lake Elmo. This is a departure from the current approach of establisliirig parking requirements for a limited number of use classifications within 4 zoning districts: General Business, Highway Business, Convenience Business and Limited Business. Not only are these zoning districts obsolete with the recent amendments made to the Comprehensive Plan, but not all use classifications are addressed within these standards. The proposed Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance is intended to remedy these deficiencies. in addition 10 standards related to location, maintenance and design of parking areas, the proposed parking ordinance (154.210) establishes dimensional standards for all parking types in Table 5-1. These dimensional standards address parallel parking, angled (45) parking, 60 parking and head -in (90) parking. Moving forward, the ordinance establishes quantifiable parking requirements in Table 5-2. Next, the ordinance also includes provisions for off-street loading (154.21 1). The Zoning Code does have existing provisions related to off-street loading, but does not include a requirement related 10 the number of loading births per the size of the facility. This ordinance remedies this gap by including a requirement pertaining to the number of loading birth, which is important in larger facilities that could he located in the Commercial (C) or Business Park (BP) districts. Finally, Staff is proposing to organize these standards under Article 5, General Regulations. These are zoning requirements that apply to land use across all zoning districts. As part of this effort, Staff suggests striking all of the existing language pertaining to off-street parking and loading, outlined in Ordinance 08-077. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Corninission recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-077 through the folioning fl?Ot1ofl. "Move to approve Ordinance 08-077, establishing off-street parking and loading requirements for all use classification in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code" In uddirion, Stuff recommends t/ic:t the Ciii' Council approve Resolution No, 2013-3/, au!/?ori:ing summary publication of Ordinance 08-077, through the following motion: Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-31, authorizing sutnrnat' publication of Ordinance 08-077." ATTACHMENT(S: 1. Ordinance 08-077 2. Resolution No. 2013-31 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-077 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADOPTING NEW OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS FOR ALL USE CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE LAKE ELMO ZONING CODE SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by repeating City Code Sections 154.095 through 154.096 in their entirety. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 051 by removing the following language: Off -Street Parking: (Also See §§ 154.095 and 154.096) The off-street parking requirements for properties Located in the Old Village District and south of Minnesota Highway 5 may be waived by the Zoning Administrator upon demonstration that there are no suitable Locations to provide off-street parking in a manner that complies with requirements found below and in §§ 154.095 and 154.096. Eating and Drinking Places One space for every 2 seats and 1 space for every 2 employees on the average maximum shift Automobile Service Stations Retail Stores or Centers Motels and Hotels Medical and Dental Clinics Three spaces for each enclosed bay plus 1 space for each day shift employee plus a minimum of 2 spaces for service vehicles and 1 additional space for each service vehicle over 2 in number Eleven spaces for the first 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction of floor area; 8 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet; 6 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 15,000 square feet of gross floor area exceeding 30,000 square feet. One space for each unit plus 1 space for each employee on any 1 shift. Four spaces for each doctor or dentist, plus 1 space for every employee or 1 for each 150 square feet of gross floor area, whichever requirement is greater. Other Commercial Uses (excluding One space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area. wholesale) SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 055 by removing the following language: Off -Street Parking (also see S 154.095) Eating and drinking places: one space for every 2 seats, and 1 space for every 2 employees on the average maximum shift. (Parking spaces for "drive- in" customers shall not be credited as a part of the off-street parking area needed to serve the sales operation conducted within the buildings.) Automobile service stations: three spaces for each enclosed bay plus 1 space for each day shift employee plus a minimum of 2 spaces for service 1 vehicles and 1 additional space for each service vehicle over 2 in number Motet and hotels: 1 space for each unit plus 1 space for each employee on any 1 shift SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 056 by removing the following Language: Off -Street Parking Retail Stores or Centers: Eleven spaces for the first 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction of gross floor area; Eight spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 1,000 square feet Other Commercial Uses, excluding Wholesale: One space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 057 by removing the following language: 2 Off -Street Parking (Also see 5 154.095) SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by adding the following language: ARTICLE 5 GENERAL REGULATIONS 5154.200 Purpose 5154.201 Applicability 5154.202 Permits Required 5154.203 Essential Services 5154.210 Dff'StreetParking 5154.211 Off -Street Loading § 154'200 Purpose The purpose o/this Article is to establish regulations for activities that may occur in many zoning districts orinassociation with avariety ofland uses, including parking, signage, and activities within yards, to promote the orderly development oruse of land and minimize conflicts among land uses. §154.3U1 Applicability The provisions ofthis Article shalt beapplied to all zoning districts and shalt be in addition to the requirements in any specific zoning district. 4 permit shalt not beissued unless all applicable general regulations are met. §154.2O2 Permits Required. Permits are required for all changes in use and all development activities, with the exception of signs, in compliance with the standards ofArticle 3, Administration. Signs shalt require sign permit in compliance with Section 151.115and Article 3. S154.2O3 Essential Services Essential services as defined by this Ordinance are permitted in any district, provided that asite plan for any new or expanded service facility is filed with the Planning Department. The City Council may require site plan review oflarge facilities, upon the recommendation of the Planning Director. § 154'210 Off -Street Parking A. Puqnmoc. The intent ufthis section is to prevent oralleviate congestion and promote the public safety and welfare by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking, and requiring that parking areas are located and constructed in a manner that provides for optimum visibility tovehicles entering and exiting said parking area, accessibility and safety. It is the responsibility of property owners to provide adequate parking to meet their specific needs. B. Applicability. Off-street parking in accordance with this section shalt be provided for at( new uses and all expansions ofexisting uses in all districts. Parking requirements may be waived in the Village Mixed -Use District (VMX). recognizing the availability ofon-street and shared parking facilities. C. Location. All required off-street parking facilities shalt belocated outside ofany street hght' of -way, and as follows: 1. Spaces accessory to one- and two-family dwellings shalt be located on the same tot as the principal use served. Spaces within garages are counted toward the required number of spaces. 2. Spaces accessory Uo muttipie'famiiydw/eihngs and nonresidential uses shalt be located on the same tot as the principal use served or within four hundred (408) feet of the main entrance tothe principal building served. 3 Off-street parking located elsewhere than on the tot where the p/incipa| use being served is located shall be under the same ownership and contro|, either by deed o/ long-term [ease, as the principal use. The owner ofthe principal use must file a recordable document with the City requiring permanent provision of off-street parking during the existence of the principal use. 4. Off-street surface parking areas containing more than four parking spaces shalt be located a minimum of twenty (ZO) feet from the boundary of any adjacent tot zoned or used for residential purposes, with the exception nflots zoned Village Mixed -Use (VMX). 5. Other Parking in Residential Areas. Parking in residential areas (off-street and on -street) shalt be Limited to the use ofthe residents ofthose homes and their guests 6. D/f'St/eetPork/ng /n Commercial Areas. Off-street surface parking areas in commercial districts shalt be located in a manner consistent with the setback requirements in §154.552. 7. Required off-street parking spaces shalt not be utilized for open storage n/goods orfor the storage ofvehicles which are inoperable orfor sate or rent. D. Parking Area Design and Maintenance. 1. Access to Parking Spaces. Each required off-street parking space shalt open directly to an aisle ordriveway ofsuch width and design as to provide safe and efficient means of vehicular access to the parking space, as shown in Table 5'1' Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions, except where accessory to residential uses ofup to four (4) units. Z. Maneuvering Area. All parking areas except those serving one and two family dwellings on Local streets shalt bedesigned sothat cars shall not be required to back into the street. If deemed necessary for traffic safety, turn -around areas may be required. 3. Surfacing and Drainage. All off-street parking areas shall bosurfaced asfollows: a. Single-family and two-family dwellings shall provide durable surface with suitable drainage. b. In all residendai, commercial and mixed use districts, all areas intended to he utilized for parking space for five (5) or more vehicles and associated driveways shall be paved with u durable surface including, but not limited to, hot asphalt, bituminous or concrete. c. In industrial districts, aKareas intended to be utilized for parking space and driveways shalt besurfaced with materials suitable hocontrol dust and drainage. Plans for surfacing and drainage for nonresidential uses shall be submitted for review and the final plan shall bcsubject towritten approval. d. Storage areas for heavy construction equipment that would damage the pavement may be exempt from the paving and surfacing requirement with an acceptable surface approved bythe City Engineer. e. Farm dwellings and farm operations are exempt from the paving requirement. f. City parks shalt be exempt from the parking requirement ifapproved by the City 4. Marking of Parking Spaces. All parking areas containing five (5) or more spaces or 4 containing angled parking shall bemarked with painted lines at least four (4)inches wide. Such markings shalt bemaintained inackeadykegbbccnndition. 5. Curbing. All open off-street parking areas designed tohave head -in parking along the property tine shall provide a bumper curb not less than five (5) feet from the side property line ora barrier ofnormal bumper height not less than three (]) feet from the side property line. 6. Landscaping and Screening. Parking areas shall be screened and landscaped as provided in Article 6'Section 154.I58. 7. General Maintenance. Parking areas and driveways shall be kept free of dirt, dust, debris and waste. In winter months, required parking areas shall be cleared ofsnow and ice within oreasonable time. 8. Accessible Parking. Accessible parking spaces for the disabled shalt be provided as required bythe International Building Code. E. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions for required parking spaces are asshown inTable 5'1' Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions and Figure 5'1, Minimum Parking Dimensions Diagram. Tabie5'1; Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions Angle (A) Width (D)^ 0(ParaUel) 45�r' 6O 901, p' 9' 9. 9' Curb Length Stall Depth 1 Way Aisle 3'VYayAide ZZ` 816" 14' IZ' 12' 18'011 14' II' 910" 19'10" 18' ZZ' 8'6" 18' ZO' 22` a For parking areas containing more than ten (10) parking spaces, compact spaces may account for uptotwenty percent (Z0%)ofthe total parking area required. They may be reduced in size to a width of eight (8) feet and m stall depth of twelve percent (12%) Less than (D) above, and must begrouped and signed appropriately uParkingspacesthatuseanappvophateiysizedcurboverhongoverniandscapedisiandor buffer may be reduced in depth by one and one-half feet (1' 6"). A concrete curb or other means shalt beprovided to prevent parked vehicles from damaging plant materials. Figure 5-1: Minimum Parking Dimensions Diagram D | F. Parking Requ/mments, Accessory, off-street parking shall beprovided msspecified ioTable 5- 2, Specific Minimum Off-street Parking Requirements, except asotherwise specified inthis section. 1. In addition to the requirements in Table 5'2, one (1) parking space shalt be provided for each commercial vehicle orvehicle necessary for the operation of the use that is maintained on the premises. Z. Parking spaces for uses with multiple components, such as hotels with dining and conference facilities, shall be based on the sum of the parking requirements ofthe separate components, Shared parking standards may beused where applicable. 3. Proof ofparking. The Planning Commission may allow parking requirements for n particular use to be relaxed orlessened in response tnan expected demand that is tower than the required standard inthis section, provided that one ofthe following conditions exists: a. Sufficient open area is set aside on the parcel to meet the required standard, if determined to benecessary mta Later date. b. If parking wilt be needed less than twenty-five (25%) of the time during typical hours of use, on -street parking accessible by sidewalk within two blocks of the site may be used in Lieu ufrequired off-street parking. 4. Where o parking study is required, a qualified transportation engineer ortransportation planner shall perform the study. The study shall contain information nnthe anticipated number o/employees, customers, visitors, clients, shifts, events' nrdeliveries tothe use, and may refer toother studies orsimilar situations elsewhere. G. Shared Parking. Joint use of required parking spaces is encouraged where two or more uses on the same oradjacent sites are able to share the same parking spaces because their parking demands occur otdifferent times. The applicant(s) must submit on analysis showing that peak parking times ofthe uses will occur atdifferent times and the parking area wilt be adequate for both uses. 4 iegaiinstrument such as an easement nrdeed restriction that guarantees access tothe parking for both uses shalt be submitted. H. Truck parking /n residential areas. No commercially licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in residential district except when Loading, unloading orrendering aservice. Recreation vehicles and pickups are not restricted bythe terms of this provision. Table 5'2. Specific Minimum Off -Street Parking Requirements Use Residential Uses Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Household Living . ! Single-family detached dwelling Two-family dwelling Single-family attached dwelling Multifamily dwelling � Zspaces per dwelling unit ! 1 space per 1'bedroom unit 2 spaces per 2-bedroom or larger unit . No fee shalt be charged for Single-family attached dwellings ' shall provide anadditional 10&of � parking spaces for visitor parking ! � i Multifamily dwellings shall also provide 1 visitor space per 4 units required spaces Use Minimum Parking Requirement Senior (elderly) housing 1 space per dwelling unit |fsenior housing may be . ! converted to general housing, in the future, proof of � additional parking shalt be required Secondary dwelling Live -work unit 1 space per secondary dwelling | ' unit � 2 spaces per dwelling unit Mobile home park 2 spaces per dwelling unit Group Living 6-- rou- - d-( facility, halfway house, congregate housing Semi -transient accommodations 9ubUcand C�icUses Cemetery | College oruniversity, other . adult learning center ' __.. Community services � | Day care center (see under Accessory Uses for Family day care) School, public or private Public assembly .--t - - � 4k�astonr��the rcquired � spaces shall beaccessible for ' client parking 1 space per employee onthe { largest shift plus 1 visitor space for every 4 residents based on capacity | 1 space per bedroom, plus one space for each fu\bimcstmffequivalent � As determined bythe Planning Director ' T^'- UetenninedbythePbnning / Director based on parking ' -----]]------th Parking -r! nnngcquo|to nn�upercenco/ e capacity ofpersons oros � determined by � ' | Director based nn parking study | 1 �pac�perempu�yeeonlargest shift plus 1 space per 7 students based oncapacity; or space per 1Ostudents ifnn off-street drop- off and pick-up space is provided 1 space per staff member plus 1 space per 5students oflegal driving age based nndesign capacity Parking study required Parking study required Existing schools not meeting this standard may berequired todevelop aparking management plan, but shalt ! not berequired toadd the | minimum number ofspaces space per each 4 seats based on . design capacity 7 Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Religious institution, place of 1 space per each 6seats or10feet ' worship ofpews inthe main assembly hall ` . � Services uusnesscencer 'to nxn--Iuikennel -c1. omm .'`- stable -- mmunicatinnseni s------- Finanda\i- tution Funeral home Transient Accommodations, Lodging Total ofparking requirements for / individual uses, excepting any that . � meet the shared parking i requirements inSection 154.210.G / ^-------'- ----� l space per employee onthe ' largest shift plus 1 space per animals ! i 1 space per 4UOsquare feet of i i gross floor area, plus l space per � company vehicle stored onthe site �11��`�11-1- ���. 1 space per staff member plus 1 ! space per 5students oflegal ' � driving age based ondesign � i capacity � 1 space per 100 square feet _ of_� ' usable floor area . 1 space per 10Osquare feet u/ -� floor area in the main assembly | ! room plus one space per staff i member ' � . . 1 space per guest room, plus | additional space for meeting or restaurant facilities -___ -_-_'____-_'__-___'-__-� �edicai_'_fuchtks � � �poces_per meU_caipro�es�onai, . or 1 space per ZOOsquare feet uf ' � | / grossfloor area - - --------�-a feet of - �m��Npm����(c��, ��perj���� lodges, etc.) � grossfloor area � '- -- - --- ---- Nursing and personal care 1 space for each 4beds, plus space per employee on the largest| ' work shift � - n-------'------------' �----'-r'---'-'- -� �xas i ��e pe/'mmsquare feet m . � grossf�orarea o! -`----------- � - - -------''-' penna�xennccy � 1 space of � gross floor area 8 Existing institutions not meeting this standard may be required k/develop aparking managementplan, but shall not be required [oadd the minimum number ofspaces Meeting and restaurant facilities may require additional parking, based on square footage of each use as defined in this table. Use Minimum Parking Requirement Repair and maintenance shop � 1space per 400 square feet of ' gross floor area Self-service storage facility —'-�--1 space -----e300 --' square feet of - office or sales area Trade shop Transportation services Veterina se ice ' Thcaproninfrnntof- ---- ' storage units shall be wide enough for two cars to pass � 1 space per ]OOsquare feet of office orsales area, plus space �per]'0VOsquare feet ofstorage ' area ''---'---- '-i i 1 space per 3OOsquare feet of . | office orsales area, plus 1 space ' / per vehicle keotnnprembes � - | � ] spaces per veterinarian, or 1 ! i space per IUOsquare feet ofgross � floor area Food Services _ _........... ........ _ Drinking and Entertainment � l space per customer seats or each 100sq. ft. ofinterior space / i (the greater), plus 1 space per 2D0 i sq. /t. exterior seating Drive-in -—�'!- ----------------'---'� hvc'/o R*s�auranL--- , Fas�'Food -! 1 'space per 3 -cus�omer-��a�� or - Restaurant, Standard Restaurant' each 100 sq. ft. of interior space ! � (the greater), plus 1 space per ZUO � ! sq. ft. exterior seating area. Drive' thvoughsshaKprnvdequeuing space for otleast 3vehicles in � advance of the menu board and 3 � vehiciesbetvveenthcmenuboan1 . / � and pick-up window / Sales ofMercha��� Garden�ent�r.Buik�no��po '/q�ft. of ----'g--s � Saks � floor area plus 1 space per 2,000 . Furniture and Appliance Sates General 'Retail Shopping Center � sq. ft. ofoutside sales ordisplay � area x -'------ - / paceper 800 sq. ft . of groo floor area 1 space per 25Osq. ft. ofgross / floor area � - 1 space per Z50sq. ft. of gross � floor area � ! 9 Includes any retail uses not specifically Listed in this table Shared parking provisions (Section 154.210.G. of this Article) are encouraged tobe Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes --- ' 1 space per4OO sq. ft. sales area | Spaces need not be paved, b�� Wayside Stand shall beadequately separated ' hn ' 1 space per I5Osq. ft. of indoor � sales area plus 1 space per 2,UDU ' square feet of storage area Amtommbibe8/ehiou|arWyeu _____ __________ �uLomobiieNs1ntenonce Services' Commercial Vehicle � Repair, Gas Station Automobile Parts/Supply Automobile Rental Car Wash | � -------.... ~ Outdoor Recreation Uses Campgrounds and Traftering Golf Course '- -------'-- Manna uum000rEn,encuinment 1 space per Z50sq. ft. of gross floor area used for sates or customer service plus Ispaces per service bay --- ---------- ---'-- | �paccper�zosq. rc cx mmoor sates area plus 1 space per 2.00O squarefeet ofstoragearea ----'--1�---- --11 -- / npaceper Jusg. n. - or - gro-so floor area plus adequate storage space for rental vehicles maintained on site � �� ����`������ 1.5spac11 esperbay' pius4�tacking spaces per bay, plus 1 space per employee on the largest shift, ---'-- -- / space per Z5osq. ��. ofin000� �and screened from the street � and adjacent properties, as determined bythe Planning Director ! Service bay shall not be � � counted as aparking space ! | sates area plus 1 space per Z,OO8 | ! sq. ft. nfoutside sates nrdisplay � area and 1 space per Z'00Osquare ! ! feet nfstorage area ` � 1 space per site, plus spaces / required for other uses `- spac es s ----- --'---�`-'- - --- ----- - ' i cesper hole plus aooinona l ! space for meeting o,restaurant | / facilities � ' As determined by the Planning Parking study may be required | Director / for large or multiple -use � ! facilities As determined �'----' by the Planning -r------ ------- � Director � 10 Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Outdoor Recreation Facility 1space per ] persons based on . Parking study may berequired � maximum occupancy load, plus 1 for Large or muhip|e'use � space per employee onthe largest ! facilities ' shift orasdetermined by parking ' � study—''--- '------------- Parks and Open Areas No requirement � _____�__ Recreation R�cre�on As determined bythe Planning Parking study may berequ/red Director Swimming pool 1 space per 10square feet of pool . area Indoor Recreation/Entertainment �_--____-____' 4du�Estmhbshment l space per Z50sq. ft. of gross � floor area |rc uo--'-eti' Facility Indoor Recreation ' 1 space per Z5Osquare feet floor / . area plus 2spaces per tennis or | ' racquet games court and 1 space | i per 15Osquare feet ufpool area Bowling '�'-__- '�- a�z ueys� spaces per lane ' Other facilities: 1 space per ] � persons based on maximum capacity Agricultural and Related Uses Agricultural Production and No requirement � Services Agricultural Support 1 space per ]DOsq. ft, of indoor � ! sales oroffice area plus 1 space . ' per 1.000 sq. ft. of outside sales or � ' display area and 1 space per Z OOO � ' �square feet of storage area Forestry Operations As determined by the Planning / � Director . Production, Processing and Storage ' Non -production industrial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. gross Light Industrial Heavy Industrial floor area upto2O,OOOsq. ft. plus ! 1 space per I,0OOsq. ft. in excess of2O`000sq. ft., or per 5 regular employees, whichever is greater. 11 Additional parking may also be required for office or retail space' osspecified inthis table Includes other industrial uses largely carried nninenclosed buildings and not individually uroaocas tin gorCom Tower [soenti t-e-�- ' - LocaiTrmndL, Railroad Transportation Accessory Uses An _ Ho --- 0 11 c I cu I pa I tio -- Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Motor freight and warehousing 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of office or | sates area, plus 1 space per ].8OO � ! � sq. ft. ofstoragearea � _ � Zspaces per 3employees onthe / Includes other industrial uses largest shift, based on maximum largely carried on outdoors i ! Landfill, Resource Extraction, Sak/age/Recyciab(e[enter � planned employment � Utilities, Transportation and Communications -r transportation ---------'--`---------�------ --/ | Director unication No ---------�-emont---' � — AadeterminedbydieP|anniny � . Director � Zspaces per 3employees onthe largest shift, based on maximum � planned employment | . - requirement No requirement unless �'---- - ---- specified in � Conditional i . ' Bed and breakfast Family Day Care, Group Family � Day Care � Ken----i- --- - -- ' Private; Stable, Pr'__ . Interim Uses interim Use l space per guest room inaddition to dwelling unit requirements 1 space per employee not residing onthe premises plus one drop-off space No requirement � 4adetermined bythe Planning � i Director | §154.211 Off -Street Loading Areas. Off-street loading space shalt be provided in all districts for any nonresidential use which wilt involve the receipt or distribution of materials o/ merchandise by trucks or similar vehicles and has a gross floor area offive thousand (5,000) square feet o/more, in accordance with the fni(awingstandards. Off-street loading area requirements may be waived in the Village Mixed -Use District (VMX). A. Number, For facilities with less than twenty thousand (ZO,OOO)square feet gross floor area, a designated loading zone may be provided on site, rather than constructing n loading berth. For facilities with twenty thousand (ZO,OUU) square feet gross floor area or greater, one (1) off- street Loading berth shall be provided for every thirty thousand (30'000) square feet gross floor area or fraction thereof. 12 B. Location. All required loading berths shall be off-street. 4 loading berth shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet from the intersection of two street rights -of -way and at [east fifty (60) feet from o residential district unless within a building. Loading berths shall not occupy the required front yard setback. C. Size. Unless otherwise specified inthis chapter, a required loading berth shalt benot less than twelve (12) feet in width, fifty (50) feet in length and fourteen (14) feet in height, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering space. D. Access. Each required loading berth shall be located with appropriate means ofvehicle access to street or public alley in a manner which wilt [east interfere with traffic. Driveway design is specified in Section 154.209 ofthis Article. E. Surfacing. Alt loading berths and access ways shall be improved with a durable material to control the dust and drainage. F. Accessory use. Any space allocated as a loading berth or maneuvering area in accordance with this Section shall not beused for the storage ofgoods, inoperable vehicles or required off- street parking. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 8. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08'077 was adopted on this sixteenth day of April 2013, by a vote of Ayesand Nays. LAKE ELMOCITY COUNCIL ' Mike Pearson, Mayor Adam Be[, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-077 was published on the day of 2013. 13 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-031 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 08-077 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-077, an ordinance to the City's regulations pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is lengthy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4. allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS. the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. 08-077 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-077, which replaces the current sections of the City Code pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading. The revised ordinance includes the following revisions from the previous ordinance: The inclusion of new parking standards related to location, design and maintenance of parking areas The incorporation of new dimensional standards for different parking types or designs Establishment of required parking quantities for all use classifications in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code and • Establishment of required number of loading births per the square footage of facility. The full text of Ordinance No. 08-077 is available for inspection at Lake Elmo city hall during reLu1ar business hours. Resolution No. 2013-31 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo that the City Administrator keep a copy of the ordinance at City Hall for public inspection and that a full copy of the ordinance be placed in a public location within the City. Dated: April 16, 201 CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the fbilowing voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2013-31 I{ ( AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: -4 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Keats M SA Street and Trunk Wate Award Contract .Jack Griffin, City Engineer Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 16 ain Improvements Accept Bids and SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of ItemCity Engineer - Report/Presentation City Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................ Mayor Facilitates - Public Input. ifAppropriate................................................................... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ..............................................................................Mayor & City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor & City Council - Action on Motion................................................................................... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The city council is respectfully requested to consider accepting contractor bids as presented and awarding a contract for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Waterrnain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-32, Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifskj' and Sons, Inc., in the amount t$1,606,833.47,for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Waterinain Iinproveinents." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Bids were received, publicly opened, and read aloud on April 9, 2013. The city engineer has prepared and attached the Tabulation of Bids and a Letter of Recommendation for the award of the contract. The City received eight (8) bids for this project, with T.A. Schifsky and Sons. inc. providing the lowest base bid in the amount of 51,606,833.47 for the 12-inch diameter Trunk Waterrnain option. The Engineer's post -design construction cost estimate for the project was $1,848,435.25. The project remains within the budget amounts established with the Feasibility Report. T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. is a Lnom contractor having successfully completed previous projects in the city. The city engineer is therefore recommending that the Council award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc.. for the 12-inch diameter trunk watcrrnain as outlined in the attached letier. Hydraulic analysis performed by AE2S in 2012 verified that the 12-inch diameter waterrnain meets the projected hydraulic requirements for the water system and results in a savings of $171,96OE40; the additional costs needed to install a 1 6-inch diameter trunk watermain. The City Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements on March 5, 2013, and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids, The Project was advertised on QuestCDNcom, Finance and Commerce, and in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review in accordance with the Minnesota Competitive Bidding requirements. The improvements include: The street reconstruction of Keats Avenue North as an Urhan Section Road meeting state aid standards at 32 feet from back of curb to back of curb with concrete curb and gutter. The installation of a 12-inch er-14-ineh diameter Trunk Waterrnain pipe connecting the existing watermain lines in the Tapestry development and Rock Point Church. Water quality improvements consisting of six shallow infiltration basins located within the existing road right-of-way to address VI3WD permit requirements. FUNDING: This project will be partially financed through special assessments. For the Street lmprovements of Keats Avenue North, the project can be primarily funded using the city's municipal state aid construction funds. In addition, there are 22 properties that are proposed to he specially assessed with an estimated unit assessment amount of 53,400. The City cost share for use of state aid funds is therefore 51,175,200. The trunk watermain improvement project is being installed as a part of the comrnunity wide integrated water system. Therefore, the watermain extension project will be primarily funded using the city's $1.0 million DEED water system grant with matching funds from the city's Water Enterprise Fund. These funds must be expended prior to December 31, 2014. Similar to a collector street improvement project. a local benefit will be realized by the properties adjacent to the trunk watermain line. Council has directed that a water lateral benefit assessrnent be levied in the amount of $2.900 to those 22 properties, with an additional water lateral benefit charge of $2,900 to be deferred until those properties connect to city water, RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve Resolution No. 2013-32, thereby acceptmg the bids and awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., in the amount of 51,606,833.47, for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain improvements. The reconrniended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-32, Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., in the amount of $1,606,833.47,for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Waterrnai,: Jinprovenzents." ATTACHM ENT(S): 1, Resolution No. 2013-32 2. Engineer's Letter of Recommendation and Tabulation of Bids 3. Project Schedule 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-32 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE KEATS MSA STREET AND TRUNK WATE' IN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watennain Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and bids were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, bids were tabulated, checked and summarized to verify that all requirements of the submittals were met and WHEREAS, the project engineer reviewed the bids and has provided a letter recommending the award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc.. in the amount of1,6O6.833.47. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract in the accordance with the above ordered Project, in the amount of the Contractor's lowest responsible bid, and according to the plans and specifications thereof approved by the City Council. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-32 *44Cedar stme smm1am Saint Paul, wwenm om.292/wo ."""z"m April 11.2013 Mr. Chad |sakson. P.E. City ofLake Elmo 38O8Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Re: Keats Avenue NlSA Street and Trunk VVahannamImprovements City ofLake Elmo, Minnesota TKOA Project No. 15230,000 Dear Mr. |eaknon: A tabulation of the Bids received by the City for the above mentioned project on April 9, 2013 has been completed with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information, Contractor T.A.Schifaky&Sons, Inc. 8urohviUeConstruction, Inc, Hardhven.|nc. Redstone Construction, Inc, Miller Excavating, Inc, [NingarConstruction, Inc. Dresel Contracting, Inc. R� L Larson Excavating Inc. Base Bid Alternate No, 1 $1.008.833.47 $1.618.210.80 $1.632.817�68 $1.637.750i22 $1.649.52615 $1.727.08&59 $1.745.044,45 $171.060.40 $172.97150 $182.110.03 $1Q8.341f0 $147�608.25 $161'742�85 $181.341�00 Engineer's Estimate $1.848.43525 $144.107-00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, T.A. Schifahy 8 Sons. Inc, for their Base Bid excluding Alternate No, 1 nf$1.80O.83147. Please donot hesitate tocall mawith any questions orcomments you may have, ; David --&4Klocker, p,E. Project Engineer OMh/jao Enclosure An employee owned company promoting offirmative action and equal opportunitU TABULATION OF BIOS KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVE1y1ENTS CIIYOF- LAKE ELMO,MINNJESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 200.185.002 BIDE OPENED APRIL 9, 2013,A02:00 PM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ITEM MNfDOT UNIT TOTAL NO NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DIVISION 1 - GENERAL 1 2021,501 :MOBILIZATION 1.00 LS $ 70,800.00 $ 70,000.00 $ 53,000.00 $ 53,00000 2 2101 .02 CLEARING 1 TREE $ 25000 $ 25000 $ 40008 $ 40000 3 201507GRUBBING 1 TREE $ 25000 $ 25000 $ 10000 1 $ 10000 4 2105 525 TOPSOIL BORROW )CV) 2744 CY $ 1400 $ 3841600 $ 500 $ 13 72000 5 2453610 iEXPLORATORYDIGGING - 8 HR $ 250.00 $ 2000.00 $ 380.00 $ 2400.00 6 2563.681 TRAFFIC CONTROL 100 LS$ 15000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 7 2573.502 SILT FENCE - - - - 5880 LF $2.00 $ 1176000 $ - - 1,00 $ 5880.00 8 2573530 INLET PROTECTION 9 EA $ 150.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 60.00 $ 540,00 9 2573 602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTIONENTRANCE 2 EA $ 1-50000 $ 3,000,00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 10 - 2573602 CULVERT PROTECTION 14 EA $ 100.D01 $ 1400.00 - $ - 75.00 $ 1050,00 11 2575.505 SODDING (SALT RESFSTASJT), - 213 55' - $ 3.00 $ 639.00 $ - - 7,00 $ - 49100 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT, 3 16465 SY -. $ 2.00 $ 32,930.00 - $ 1.03 $ 1695895 13 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 250 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 3) 3.36 AC $ - 2,500,08 $ 8,400.00 $ 525.00 f $ 14 2575,605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 4) 023 AC $ 3580.08 $ 885,00 $ 1,545.00 $ SUBTOTAL $ 186,200,00 $ DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN 1 2504.602 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ 2500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,81100 $ 2 2504602 CONNECT TOEX)STINGWATERMAIN 2 EA $ 1250,00 $ 2,500.00 $ 3309.00 $ 3 2504.682 6' HYDRANT - 13 EA $ 3,000.80 $ 39,000.00 $ 3244,50 . $ 4 2504.602 15" GATE VALVE & 530X 13 EA $ 1250.00 $ 16,250.00 $ 1236.00 $ 52504.002 8' GATE VAVLE & BOX 3 EA 0 1,85000 $ 5550.00 $ 1,627.48 $ 6 2504.002 12" GATE VAVLE & BOX 15 EA $ 2,800.00 $ 42000.00 $ 2,811,90 $ 7 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 3 EA $ 150.00 $ 450.80 $ 278.10 $ 6 2504.602 1.5' CORPORATION STOP - 18 EA $ 200.00 $ 3600.00 $ 607.70 $ 9 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 741.60 $ 10 2504.602 1 CURII STOP AND BOX 3 j EA $ 150.00 $ 450.08 $ 566,50 $ 11 2504.602 1,5" CURB STOP AND BOX 18 EA $ 200.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 698 10 $ 12 2504.602 2" CURB STOP AND 60.- . - '1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 844.60 $ 3 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE ‚ 135 LF $ 20.00 $ 2,700.80 $ 20.60 $ 14 2504.603 1.5' TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 5413 LF $ 22.00 $ 12,056.80 $ 2369 $ lj 2504 603 2 TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 45 LF $ 2800 $ 126000 $ 3090 $ 16 2504.603 6" DIP CL, 52 WATERMAIN 303 LF $ 28.00 $ 8484,00 $ 2781 $ 17 2504.603 8"DIP CL. S2WATERMAIN_ - , - 52 LF $ 36.00 $ 1,976,00 $ 32.96 $ 18 2504.603 12" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 5954 LE 5 55,00 $ 327,470.80 $ 43.00 $ 19 2504.603 12" HDPE DR. 11(DIP,j,,BY .80 - 2435 LF - - $ 58.00 $ 141,230,80 $ 58.001 $ 20 2504.608 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4294 LEIS $ 5.50 j $ 23.61 7,00 $ 4.74 $ 21 2564.551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER - 2 EA $ 250.08 j $ 580.00 $ 17000 $ JSUBTOTAL- $ 638,193.00 . $ 1 DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 1 2104 50) REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS (ALI TYPES & SIZES) 1015 LF $ 988 $ 914400 $ 700 $ 7,112,00 $ 800 $ 13 12808 2 2104.52) SALVAGE CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL _TYPES &51ZE0) 85' LF $ 7.00 $ 595.00 $ 13.00 i $ 1,10500 , $ I5.00 $ - 1,27500 3 2501 515 15 RCP FES P1/ TRASH GUARD 4 EA $ 45008 $ 1 80000 6 116390 $ 465568 $ 85000 $ 340000 4 2501.515 18' RCP FES P11 TRASH GUARD 4 EA $ 500.00 $ 2,008.80 $ 1,215.40 j $ 4,861.60 - L$940M0 $ 3,758.00 5 2501.515 21"RCP FES VV/TRASH GLJARD6 EA $ 550.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 1,42)40 $ 8,528.40 $ 1,300,00 $ 7,800.88 6 2501 521 22 SPAN RCP CL 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 47 j LF$ 3200 $ 1 58400 $ 5000 i $ 235008 f $ 9050 $ 425350 7 2581 521 .28' SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE_ 49 LF $ 36.00 $ 1,764.00 $ 60.00 $ 2,940,00 1 $ 99.50 $ 4,875.58 8 2501.521 135" SPAN REP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 50 LF $ 48.00 $ 2,400.00 $ 62.40 $ 4,944.00 j 1 $ 105,50 $ 6,330.00 1 TKDA T.A. SCHIFSKY BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 15,000,00 $ 15,000.80 1 $ 2130.00 $ 250.00 1 $ 160.00 $ 150,00 $ 18.08 $ 49,392.00 $ 250.08 $ 2,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000,00 $ 1.60 $ 9,408,00 $ 125.00 $ 1,125.00 6 900.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 90.00 $ 1,260,00 $ 5.50 $ 1,171.50 $ 1,07 , $ 17,517.55 1,764.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 5,384.00 355.35 , $ 3,950.00 $ 908.50 122,059.30 $ 111,485.55 7,622.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 8,800,00 6,798.00 $ 2,580.00 $ 5,000.00 42,178.50 $ 4000.00 $ 52,000.00 1 16,068.00 $ 1,208.00 $ 15,500.00 4,882,20 $ 1,700.00 $ 5,100.00 42,1 78.50 5 3,100.00 $ 46,500,00 834.30 $ 125.80 $ 375.00 10,938.60 $ 300.00 $ 5,400.00 741.50 ..450.00 $ 450,00 - -‚ 1,1399.50 ' $ 200.00 $ 600.00 12,421.80 $ 325.00 $ 5,850.00 844.50 $ 450.00 j $ 450,00 2,781.00 $ 17.00 $ 2,295.00 12,982.12 $ 21.00 $ 11,588.00 1,390.50 $ 26.00 j $ 1,170.00 8,426.43 $ 37,50, 9 11,3132.50 1,713.92 $ 42.00 $ 2,164.00 256,022,00 $ 43.00 $ 256,022,00 141,230.00 $ 51,00 $ 124,185.00 -- 20,353.55 $ 4.75 $ 20,395.50 340.80 $ 75,00 $ 1 50,00 1 592,447.13 $ 574,598,00 Page 1 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL. STATE Al[) PROJECT NUMBER 206105002 BIDS OPENED; APRIL 9,2013, AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY - 9 - 2501.525 22" SPAN RCP FES WJTRASI-1 GUARD -- 2 10 2501.525 28" SPAN RCP FES 51// TRASH GUARD 2 11 2501,525 36SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD 2 12 2501.S71INSTALL SALAVAGE000NCRETE PIPE CULVERT(ALL TYPES 8 SIZES) 65 3 2502 521 15' CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT W/ APRON j 326 142502.521 18"CMPDRIVEWAY CULVERT W/APRON 120 15 2503.511 15' RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 126 16 2503,511 18" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE_ 61 17 2503.511 21" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 226 18 2,06 502 48 DIAMETER MANHOLE TYPE 4065 5 19 2506.601 INFILTRATION BASIN 6 20 251 1,501 CL. 3 RIPRAP W( 1EOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 94.2 21 2511.501 EL. 4 RIPRAP WI GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 15.2 SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4 - STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 213 - 2104,501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL TYPES) 6 3 2104.505 IREMOVE & OISPOSE OF EXIST. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 0710 4 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN i8 5 2104.523;SALVAGE MAILBOX 20 6 2104.523 'SALVAGE POST& SIGN 9 7 2105,501'COMMON-EXCAVATION (9) . . 16252 6 2105.522(SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV), SPEC 3149.213 8527 9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FOR ROAD STABILIZATION; MnDOT TYPE V 300 10 2106607 SUBGRADE CORRECTION 100 11 2112,501 SUBGRADEPREPARATION (ROADWAY) , 65 12 221 1.501 CL.5 AGGREGATE BASE , 1 7534 13 2357,502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT . 1044 14 2360.501 SPVVEA240BB!TUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 1667 15 2360.501 SPW[A24OBBITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (DRIVES) 115 10 2360.502 50NW1323013 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 3111 17 2502.501 4"PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL -. 6 16 2502.541 4" PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN W/13ACKF1LL & WRAP 6083 19 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE, FITTINGS, & STEEL CAP) 26 20 2502.602 DRA1N11LE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 10 21 2531.501 13416 CONCRETE 001313 & GUTTER 12650 22 2531.602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 1 23 2531.602 CONCRETE CURB CUT 38 24 2531.602 G"CONCRETE FLUME_ 82 25 2531.618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 6 25 2540.602 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX .- 20 27 2554.602 PERMANENT BARRICADE 26 , 2564.531 'INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPEC (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) 18 29 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 9 30 2564 533 (FURNISH SIGN PANELS, TYPE C 117.00 31 2582.502 4" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW EPDXY 4720 32 2562.502 4" SOLID LINE VVF1TEPDXY - - 12240 33 2582502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY 755 34 2562.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW EXPDXY 1265 35 2582.502 24' SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY -- 25 SUBTOTAL TOTAL BASE 13113 UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA CY CY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE T.A. SCHIFSKY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 500.00 i 5 1,000.00 5 1287.50 $ 2,575,00 550.00 13 1,100.00 $ 1,565.50 j $ 3,131.20 650,00 1 6 1,300.00 , 13 2,183.60 j $ 4,367.20 0.00 j $ 650.00 21.53 6 1,839.55 25.00 $ 8,150.00 $ 2864 $ 9,401.84 30.00 $ 3.60000 $ 33.90 $ 4,078.80 30.00 $ 3,780,00 j $ 26.78 $ 3,374.28 33,00 $ 2,013.00 $ 29.57 $ 35.00 67,910.00 I 6 34.00 $ 2,800,00 $ 15,800.00 ' $ 2.260,00 5 1,200.00 $ 7,200.00 $ - - 600.00 $ 00.00 $ 9,478.00 $ 100.00 I $ 110.00 $ 1,782,00 $ 105.00 $ $ 87,070,00 LF $ 5.00 EA $ 15000 SY $ 2.50 EA $ 50.00 EA $ 7500 EA $ 75.00 CY 1 $ B.00 CY $ 10.00 SY 6 2.50 CY $ 25,00 135 $ 250.00 TN $ 13.00 (3A $ 2.50 TN TN TN EA LF EA EA LF EA EA SY SF EA EA EA EA SF LF LF LF LF LF $ 60.00 $ 70.00 13 58,00 $ 175,00 $ 5.00 $ 150,00 $ 200.00 $ 11.00 $ 350.00 -- $ 100.00 32.00 75.00 500.00 135.00 350.00 9.50 1 50 1.00 1.00 0.75 3 00 1,822.07 7,684.00 1 3,596,00 3,600.00 9,420.00 1,701,00 103,086.54 $ 1,065.00 $ 3.09 , $ 655.17 5 000.00 $ 360.50 $ 2,16300 $ 49,275.00 $ 1.00 $ (9,71000 $ 900,00 $ 30.00 . $ 540.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 25 00 , $ 500.00 $ 675.00 $ 30.00 j $ 270.00 $ 154,016.00 $ 8.00 $154,015,00 $ 85,270,00 $ 8.29 $ 70,688,83 5 750.00 = $ 1.00 $ 300,00 5 2,500.00 $ 15.00 13 1,500.00 $ 16,250.00 $ 10000 6 0,500,00 $ 97,942.00$ 8.50 $ 64,039.00 $ 2,51000 $ 3.00 $ - 3,132.00 $ (12,020.00 -$ 66.00 5 123,222.00 5 5,050.00 5 80.00 $ $ 180,438,00 $ 56.00 $ $ 1,050,00 13 5 30,415.00 $ $ 3,900.00 $ $ 2,000.00 $ $ 139,150.00 $ $ 350.00 $ $ 9,500,00 $ 5 8,200,00 $ 5 255.00 $ $ 1,500.00 $ 5 500.001 '5 $ 2,430,00 $ 5 1,350.00 $ 13 1,111.50 i 5 $ 7,080.00 5 $ 12,240.00 , $ 5 755.00 $ , 9413,75 : 13 75.00 j $ $ 936,972.25 $ 1,848,435,25 4(2,00 3.50 155.00 250,00 8.34 400.00 10.00 35 00 s�-00 1000 400,00 55,00 50,00 24.00 0.62 0,32 0.31 0,10 15.45 TKDA BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 1,000.00 f $ 2,000.00 $ 1,550.00 $ 3,100.00 / $ 2,025.00 ' $ 4,050.00 - $ 25.00,62,12500 $ 50.50 $ 26,243.00 - 13 83,00 13 9,960.00 $ 40.75 $ 5,890.50 13 49.00 $ 2,089.00 $ 97.00 $ 19,662,00 $ 2,250.00 $ 13,500.00 $ 200.00 $ 1.200.00 $ 80.00 $ 7,536.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,296.00 - $ 139,373.50 '5 '5 $ '5 /5 :5 5 /5 6 $ 3.00 $ 85.00 $ 1.50 5 30.00 $ 4500 $ 30.00 $ 7.25 $ 9.50 $ - 3.75 1 $ 9.00 $ 140.00 $' 10.90 $ 2.40 $ 55.65 ' 639.00 510.00 29,565.00 540.00 - 900 00 270.00 139,57700 72,476.50 1,125.00 1.900,00 9,100.00 82,12060 2,505.60 -- 104,271.95 9,200.00 $ 91.45 $ 10,516.75 180,438.00 $ 55.90 $ 173,593.80 2,472,00 $ 230.00 $ 1,389.00 23.29050 $ 3.75 $ 22,811.25 4,030.00 $ 200.00 $ 5,200.00 2,500.00 $ 150.00 ' $ 1,500.00 105,501.00 $ 9.00 $ 113,850.00 400.00 13 400.00 $ 400.00 380.00 I,,,,,,,.,30-00 1,140.00 2,952.00 - $ 39.00 $ 3,1913.00 400.00 $ 46.00 $ 308.00 200,00 : $ 80.00 $ 1,600.00 400.00 $ 260.00 $ « 260,00 990.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,060.00 45000: $ 2,808.00. $ 2,926.40 $ 3,916.80 :, $ 234.05 126.50 , 3813,25 $ 789,240.50 1,606,833.47 55.00 $ 24.00 $ 0.55 $ 0.31 5 0.27 5 0.27 5 4.50 5 495,00 2,806,00 2,596 00 3.794.40 203.95 341,55 12.50 $ 792752,75 $ 1,618,210.80 Page 2 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIOS OPENED: APIIL 0.2013. AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION TKDA ENGINEERS ESTIMATE T.A, SCHIFSKY BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504,602 DEDUCT 12 WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ (258000) $ (500000) $ (3,700.00) $ (740000) $ (400000) $ (800000) 2 2504.602 I6'WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ 5000.00 $ 10000.00 $ 6500.00 $ 13000.00 $ 500000 $ 10000.00 3 2504 802 DEDUCT 12 GATE VALVE & 6O 3 EA $ (280000) $ (36,400.00) $ (2.730.00) $ (35,490.00) $ (3,100.00) $ (40,30D.00) 42504602 - 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 13 ES $ 4000.00 $ 52000,00 $ 3100.00 $ 40300.00 $ 3000,00 $ 39000.00 5 2504.603 DEDUCT 2' DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN - 59)5 LF $ (55.00)1 $ (32532500) $ (43.00) $ (254,345.00)$ (45.00) $ (266175.00) 6 2504 003 16 DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN 5915 LF $ 6308 $ 37284500 $ jO 00 $ 34307000 I $ 5700 $ 337 15500 7 2504.603 DEDUCT 12" HDPE OLE 1 l(DIPS), BY -100 2435 LF 5 (58.00) $ (141.230.00(1 $ (57,00)1 $ (I38795.00)( $ (5100) $ (124185.00) 5 2504.603 6" HOPE DR, 1 1(DIPS). BY HDD 2435 LE $ 82.00 199,670,00 $ 80.00 $ 194,500.00 $ 86.00 $ 209410.00 9 2504.608 DEDUCT 12'MJDIP COMPACT FITT)NGS 3200 - EA$ (5.50)j $ (17,I500.00) $ (4.60)1 $ (14720.00)1 $ (4.75) $ (15200,00) 10 2504.006 16' MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 5438 EA $ 6.50 j $ 35347.00 $ 5.80 t $ 31,540,40 i $ 575 $ 31,268.50 SUBTOTAL1 .$ 14410700 : $ 171,960.40 $ 172,973.50 GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. l -- 1-. - $ 1992,542.25 . $ 1778,793.87 $ 1791184.30 Page 3 TABULATION OF BIOS KEATO AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS ciry DE LAKE ELMO, M)NNESOTA 1KDA PROJECT NO. 15230000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 200105002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9,2013, AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN(DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION 1 - GENERAL 1 2021501 MOBILIZATION 2 - 2101502 CLEARING 3 2101507 GRUBBING 4 2105.525 TOPSOIL 0ORFlOW(9V - 5 - - 2453610 EXPLORATDRY DIGGING 6 2563601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 7 2573 502;SILT FENCE 8 2573530 INLEFPRO FEC1')ON 9 2573.602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 10 2573602 CULVERT PROTECTION 11 2575.505 SODDING (SALT RESISTANT) 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT. 3 - 13 2575,605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 250 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 3) 14 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 4) 1SUBTOTAL DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN 1 2504.602 2" $VATERMAIN DFFSET 2 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXIST)NGWATERMAINJ 3 2504.002 G HYDRANT 4 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & OOX 5 2504.602 8" DATE VAV..E & (30)1 6 2504.602 :12 GATE VAVLE & 90)1 7 2504 602 CORPORATION STOP 8 2504.602 115" CORPORATION STOP 9 . 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP 10 2504.602 1' CURB STOP AND BOX 11 2504,602 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX 12 2504.602 2' CURB STOP AND 130)1 13 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 14 2504.503 1.5 TYPE 1< COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE (5 2504.603 2" TYPE (1 COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 16 2504.603 6' DIP CL. 52 VVA[ERMA!N 17 2504.603 8" DIP CL. 52WATERMAIN (8 2504.603 , 12 01P CL. 52 WATERMA!N 10 2504.603 12" 1-IDPE DR, 11)DIPS).BYHDD 20 2504.608 MJ 0(0 COMPACT FITTINGS 21 . 2504,551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER SUBTOTAL DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 2104,501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 2 2104.52) SALVAGE CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT(ALL TYPES & SIZES) 3 2501.515 1(5" RCP FES Wi 3RASH GUARD 4 2501,515 18"RCP FESW/TRASH GUARD 5 2501.5)5 21" RCP FES WITRASEI GUARD 6 2501.521 22' SPAN RCP CL 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 7 2501 521 28" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 8 2501.521 36" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE EA $ EA 5 EA $ EA 5 EA $ EA $ EA $ EA I EA 15 EA IS EA $ LF $ LF $ LF $ LF $ LF 5 LF 5 LF 5 LLSS 15 EA 5 1 TKOA DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES. INC REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL uNli'r TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUAN'rpoy , UNIT' PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1.00 ., LS $ 24353.40 $ 24,353.40$14,750.00 $ 14,750.00 $ 56,629.00 $ 56,629.00 TREE $ 264.72 $ 264.72 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ , 300.00 S 300.00 TREE $ 158.83 5 158.83 5 200.00 $ 200.00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 2744 CY $ 18.74 $ 51,422.56 5 8.01 $ 27.44 $ 16.50 $ 45.27600 HR $ 370.62 5 2,96496 $ 600.00 $ 4,800,00 5 205.00 $ 1,640.00 1,00 , LS 5 3,070.67 $ 3,970,87 $ 4.50000 $ 4,500.00 $ 3,75000 $ 3,750.00 5880 LF $ 1.76 $ 10,346.80 $ 1.85 $10,878.00 $ 1.70 $ 0,996,00 9 EA $ 95.30 $ 857.70 $ 150,00 ' $ 1,350.00 1 $ 100,00 $ 900.00 2 , ....EA , $ 423.56 $ 847.12 .$ 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 90000 $ 1,800.00 14 EA $ 9530 $ 133420 $ 10000 5 140000 $ 10000 $ 140000 213 SY 1 $ 9.53 $ 2.029,89 $ 0.00 $ 1,278.00 $ 9.00 $ 1,91700 00465 SY j $ 1,04 $ 17,123.60 : $ 1.00 5 16,465.00 $ 1.00 6 10,465,00 3,36 AC 1 $ , 534.74 $ 1,796.73 $ 50000 $ 1,650.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 4,704.00 0.23 AG $ 1,549,17 $ 356.31 . $ 1,50000 $ 345.001' $ 2,000.00 $ 460.00 $ 117,829.69 $ 62,273,44 $ 145337,00 13 13 3 15 3 18 18 135 546 45 303 52 5954 2435 4294 3,017.93 $ 7,835.86 6 3,650.00 $ 7,300.00 .5 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00 3,494 37 $ 8,988.74 $ 483.00 $ 966.00 , ,' $ 1,200.00 $ 2,400.00 3,335.53 $ 43,361.69 8 4,068,00 $ 52,780,00 $ 3,585,00 $ 46,605,001 1,270.68 $ 16,518.84 $ 1,150.00 $ 14,050.00 $ 1,360.00 $ 17,940.00 1,67306 $ 5,019.18 $ 1,920.00 $ 5,760.00 $ 1,815.00 $ 5,44500 2,890.80 $ 43,362.00 $ 3,240,00 $ 48,600.00 $ 3390.00 $ 50,850.00 285.90 $ 857.70 $ 110.00 $ 330.00 6 260.00 $ 840.00 624.75 $ 11,24550 ' $ 377.00 $ 6,786.00 .$40.00 $ 8,120.00 762.41 $ 762.41 $ 538.00 $ 538.00 = $ 535.00 $ 53500 582.39 $ 1,747.17 $ 259.00 $ 777.00 i $ 245,00 $ 735.00 709.48 $ 12,770.25 1 $ 404.00 $ 7,272.00 $ 390.00 $ 7,020.00 868.30 $ 868.30 $ 639.00 $ 639.00 $ 620.00 $ 620.00' 21.16 $ 2,559.30 J $ 26.90 $ 3,631 50 i $ 22,25 , $ 3,803,75 24.35 $ 13,343.80 $ 35.00 $ 19,508,60 $ 27.50 1 $ 15,070.00 31.77 $ 1,429.65 $ 46.80 $ 2,106.00 $ 45.00 - $ 2,025.00 25.59 $ 8,662 77 $ 33,50 $ 10,150.50 $ 36.00 ' $ 10,908.00 33.88 $ 1,781.76 - $ 38.50 $2,002.00 $ 50.00 $ 2,600.00 45.53 $ 271,085.82 $ 46,70 $ 278,051.80 $ 50.25 $ 299,188,501 80.36 $ 145,976,00 - $ 56.00 $ 136,350.00 $ 53,65 $ 130,637.75 4.87 $ 20,911.75 $ 4 85 $ 20,825.90 8 4.75 $ 20,396.50 79.42 $ 155.64 $ 120.00 $ 240,00 , 5 180.00 $ 350.00 $ 618,52799 - - $ 619,574.50 - - $ 630,299,50 018 LF $ 7,41 $ 7,52858 6 5.40 $ 5,486.40 6 5.00 $ -- 5,050.00 85LF $ - 12.71 $ 1080.35 $ 8.60 $ 731.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,700.00 4 EA $ 119556 $ 4,782.24 5 6750015 271200 5 81000 $ 324800 4 EA $ 1.249,50 $ 4,998,00 $ 735.00 $ 2.940,00 $ 865.00 $ 3,460.00 6 EA $ 1,461,28 $ 8,767.68 $ 902.00 $ 5,772.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 6,480.00 47 LF $ - 49.77 $ 2,339,19 $ 49.20 1 $ 2,312.40 $ 6800 $ 3,196.00 49 LF - 5 6142 $ 3,009.561 $ 5770 $ 2,627.30! $ 70.00 $ 3,43000: 60 LF $ 64.7) $ 5,082.60 1 $ 60.40 $ 4,004.00 1 1 $ 85.00 $ 5,100,00 - Page 4 KEATS AVENUE MSA SI'REET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY 06 LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA TKDA PROJEC 1 510, 15230000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206I05002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9.2013, AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT 510. NO. 9 10 11 12 13 1 14 15 113 17 18 ID 20 21 DESCRIPTION 2501.525 22 SPAN RCP FES 1741 [RASH GUARD 2501,525 28" SPAN RCP FES VW TRASH GUARD 2501.525 36"SPAN RCP FES W/T6ASH GUARD 2501.571 INSTALL SALAVAGED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT_ (ALL TYPES& SIZES)I 2502.521 15"CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT W( APRON 2502.521 I8"CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT WIAPRON 2503.511 15' RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2503,511 18' RCP CL, 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2503,511 2 RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2506.502 148 DIAMETERMANHOLE. TYPE 4013S 2506.601 INFILTRATION BASIN 251 1,501 CL. 3 RIPRAP WI GEO1EXTILE FILTER FABRIC 2511.501 CL. 4 RIPRAP W(GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4- STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104,501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 2 2104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL TYPES) 3 2104.505 REMOVE &DLSPOSE OF EXiSJ BITUMIN008 PAVEMENT 4 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN 5 2104,523 SALVAGE MAILBOX 6 2104.523 SALVAGE POST &SIGN 7 2105.501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 8 2105522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV), SF'EC314928 9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILL FOR ROAD S'IABILIZATION: MnDo'r T'YPE V 10 2106.607 SUBGRADE CORRECTION 11 2112,501 SUPGRADE PREPARATION (ROADWAY) 12 2211.501 CL.5AGGREGATE BASE 13 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT -, 14 2380.501 SPWEA2408 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 15 2360.501 SPWEA2400 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (DRIVES) BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 7 2502,501 4'P RECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL -. 8 2502 541 4" PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN W/BACKFILL & WRAP 10 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE. FITTINGS, & STEEL CAP) 20 2502.602 DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 21 2531.501 6418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 22 2531.602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 23 2531.602 CONCRETE CURB CUT 24 2531.602 6" CONCRE'IE FLUME 25 2531.618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 26 2540.802 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX 27 2554.602 , PERMANENT BARRICADE 28 2564.531 INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) 20 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 30 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS TYPE C 31 2582.502 4" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 32 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY 33 2582.502 1,4" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY - 34 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW- EXPDXY 35 2582.502 24' SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY SUBTOTAL TOTAL BASE BID QUANTITY 85 326 120 126 51 226 LF 13 EA 6 . EA 94.2 CY 16.2 CY 213 6 19710 18 20 9 19252 8527 300 100 65 7534 1044 1867 115 3111 6 5083 26 10 12650 36 82 20 18 9 117.00 4720 12240 755 1265 25 UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF RS TN GA TN TN TN EA LF EA EA LF EA EA SY SF EA EA EA EA DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 1,323.63 $ 2,647.26 1 1,609.53 $ 3,219,06 $ 2,244.87 13 4,489.74 $ 22.44 13 1,907.40 $ 29.65 $ 9665.90 $ 34.94 13 4,192.50 $ 27.53 13 3,468.78 $ 30.71 $....._ ' 1,873.31 $ 34 94 $ 7,896.44 $ 2,329.58 $ 13,977.48 $ 20649 $ 1,238.94 13 ID0.60 1 $ 0,476.52 5 1111815 1,801.12 $ 103,442.95 REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 749.00 - $ 1,498.00 13 1,14000 $ 2,280.00 1 $ 1,520,00 13 3,040.00 $ 24.70 $ 2,099.50 13 42.60 13 13,887.60 $ 45,10 13 5,412.00 13 26.60 13 3,351.60 $ 2860 ! $ 1,744.80 13 33.10 13 7,480,60 13 2,380.00 13 14,280.00 13 360.00 13 2,1130,00 102.00 13 9,608.40 13 107.00 13 1,733.40 13 95,520,80 LF 13 2.91 13 619.83 13 EA 13 79.42 13 476.52 13 SY 13 1.32 13 26,017,20 EA 13 26.47 13 476.46] 13 EA 13 23.30 13 466.00 1 . $ EA 13 65.65 13 800.85 13 2500 13 CY 13 7.36 13 141694,72 13 CY 13 8.76 13 74,696.52 13 SY 13 3.87 13 1,161,00 13 CY 13 19.94 13 1,994.00 $ 142,95 13 9,201.78 13 11.28 13 84,983.52 2.24 13 2,338.56 13 57.39 13 107,147.13 90.17 113 I0,369.55 13 5532 13 172,100,52 13 15 13 13 13 13 13 $ 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 .13 15 13 13 LF 13 LF LF LF LF 13 13 13 13 232,96 13 3.62 13 201.19 13 132.36 13 863 13 402.38 13 1,307.76 13 22,020.45 13 5,230.94 13 1,323.60 13 109,169.50 1 13 40238 13 29.65 13 1,126.70 13 40.03 13 3,282,46 , 13 47.65 $ 381.20 13 39.18 1 13 783.130 13 264.72 13 264.72 13 52.95.13 053.10 13 52.94 : -, 476,46 13 435 13 2,848.95 13 0.64 13 3,020,80 13 $ 0.32 $ 241.60 13 0.60 13 759.00 13 14.82 13 370,50 13 13 792,517,05 1 $ 17.68 * 1.50 13 125,00 13 1,00 13 25.00 13 22.00 13 12.24 13 8,00 13 1.80 13 12.24 13 50.00 13 11.30 13 2.25 13 54.85 13 90.45 I 13 54.80 13 150.00 13 6.00 13 8000 13 25.00 13 8.! $ 300.00 13 5.00 13 43.50 13 35.00 13 37,00 13 250.00 13 50.00 13 50.00 13 23,00, 13 0.60 13 0.31 $ 0.30 $ 0.06 13 14,00 $ 1 TKDA MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 13 650,00 13 1,30000 13 920.00 13 1,840.00 13 1,135.00 13 2,270.00 13 20.00 13 1,700.00 13 , 31.00 13 10,106.00 13 34.50 13 4,140.00 13 28:85 $ ,-, 3,635,10 $ 32.00 13 1,95200 13 , 36,00 t 13 8,136.00 $ 2,010.00 13 12,060.00 13 1,500.00 13 9,000.00 5 80.00 13 7,536,00 13 80.00 $ 1,296.00 13 96,657.10 31050 13 5.00 13 75000 113 100.00 13 19.710,00 Is 1.80 13 450.00j 13 25.00 13 440.00 , , 1 13 40.00 13 225.00 13 25.00 13 235,644 48 13 6.50 13 68,216,00 13 9.00 , 5 540.00 13 2.00 13 1,224.00 - 13 8.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 125.00 13 85,134.20 5 10.00 13 2,340.00 13 2.25 13 102,404.95 13 54.85 13 10,401.75 5 90,4, 13 170,482.80 ' $ 54 80 13 900.00 13 300.00 < 13 36,498,00 $ 5.75 13 2.080 00 13 300.00 13 13 100.00 13 '102,465.00 , 13 8.15 I 13 300.00 -, 13 ' - 38000 $ 100,00 13 28.00 { 13 3.567 00 13 37.80 , 13 280.00 13 45.00 13 740,00 13 250.00 13 900.00 13 450.00 $ j 13 2,832.00 13 3,794.40 226.50 13 75.00 $ 350.00 13 850,381,48 1 13 1,637,750.22 75.00' 13 250.00 13.. 50.00 13 50.00 13 23.00 13 0.55 13 028 13 0.28 13 0.26 13 10.00 13 1,065.00 600.00 35,478.00 450,00 600 00 225.00 125,138.00 76,743.00 600.00 800.00 8,125.00 75,340.00 2,349.00 102,404,95 10,401.75 170,482.80 I,800.00 34,977,25 7,800.00 1,000.00 103,097,50 380.00 1,064.00 3,099.60 350,00 1,500,00 250.00 900 00 450.00 2,691.00 2,543.20 j 3,427.20 211.401 328.00 250.00 777,232.55 649,526,15 Page 5 )<EAFS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE. ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PRoJEcrNo. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 20(3-105-002 BIOS OPENED APRIL 9,2013 AT 200 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO NO. DESCRIPTION ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504602 DEDUCT 32 WATERMAIN OFFSET — 2 2 2504602 16"WATERMAIN OFFSET 3 2504002 DEDUCT 12 CAIE VALVE & BOX 13 4 2504602 16"BU) EERFLY VALVE 13 5 2504 603 DEDUCT 12" DIP CL52 WATERMAIN 5915 6 2504803 (6" OlE CL. 52 WATERMAIN 59)5 7 2504.603 DEDUCT I2"HDPEDR. 11(DIPS)BYHDD 2435 8 2504603 i 16" HDPE DR. 11(IIPS), BY HDD 2435 9 2504608 1DEDUCT1?" MJ OlE COMPACT FITTINGS 3200 0 2504606 j (6" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 5438 SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. 1 T'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT , EA $ (3,91793) $ (7,83566) - $ (3,550.00 $ (730000) $ EA $ 0,88285 5 13,70570 $ 8,46000 $ 12,92000 $ EA $ (2,890 80) $ (37.58040) 5(3,24000) 5 (42,12000) $ EA $ 3282.59 $ 42,67367 $ 3,13000 $ 40,69000 $ LF 6 (45.53) 5 (269,30995) $ (46701 $ (276,23050) - 9 LF $ 6142 5 363,29930 $ 6360 $ 376,19400 $ LF $ (60.36)$(46,076.60) S (513.00)$(136,360 00) $ LF $ 8171 $ 206,268.85 $ 9000 $ 2)915000 $ EA $ (4.67)9 (15,58400)) $ (485) $ ((5.52000) $ EA $ 614 ! 33,38932 $ 495 $ 26,918.10 5 $ 182,110,03 $ 198,341,60 $ 1,814,427,71 $ 1,836,091,82 ., TI'CDA MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT (3,500.00) - $(7,00000) 4,845 00 $ 9600.00 (3,39000) $ (44,07000) 3,865 00 5 50,24500 j * (5025) $ (297,228 75) 6100 $ 360,81500 (53.65) 5 (130,637.75) 7795 $ 69,80825 (4.75(1 $ (15,200.00) 575 5 31,266,50 $ 147,590,25 1 $ 1,797,216,40 Page 6 TABULATION OF BIDS KFJ\1'S AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105002 61185 OPENED: APRL 9,2013, AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINGER CONSTRUCTION ITEM MN/OOT UNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT DIVISION 1 -GENERAL 1 2021,501 MOBILIZATION 1.00 LS $ 87,000.00 = $ 87,000.00 2 2101502 CLEARING 1 TREE S 50000 $ 500.00 3 2101 507 GRUBBING 1 TREE $ 50000 $ 500.00 4 2105525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV 2744 CY 5 0.011s2744 5 2453610 EXPLORATORY DIGGING 8 HR S 28580 $ 228000 6 2563 601 1 RAFFIC CONTROL 1.00 LS $ 420000 $ 420000 7 273 502 SILT FENCE - 5880 LF $ 1,85 $ 10,87800 8 2573530 INLET PROTECTION 9 EA $ 100.00 $ 000.00 9 2573602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2 - EA $ 050.00 $ 1,900.00 10 - 2573.602 CULVERT PROTECTION 14 EA $ 95.00 $ '1,330,00 1 2575.505 SODDING (SALT REsIsTANT) - 213 sY $ 10.00 $ 2130.00 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT, 3 16465 SY $ 1.05 $ 17288.25 13 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 250AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 31 3.36 AC $ 560.00 $ 1,881,50 4 2575.805 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 41 0.23 AC $ 1,600,00 $ 368.00 SUBTOTAL $ 131,183,29 DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN 1 2504.602 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 2504,602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 2504.602 6" HYDRANT 4 2504.602 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 5 2504.602 8" GATE VAVLE & SOX 6 2504.602 2" GATE VAVLE & BOX 7 . 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 8 2504.602 1.5" CORPORATION STOP 0 ' 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP 10 2504.602 1" CURB STOP AND BOX 11 2504.602 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX 12 I 2504.602 2" CURB STOP AND BOX 13 i 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 14 i - 2504.603 1.5" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 15 2504 603 2" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE - 16 I 2504.603 6" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN_ 17 2504.603 8" 1810 CL, 52 WATERMAIN 18 2504.603 12" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 18 2504.603 12" HOPE DR, 11(DIPS), BYHDD 20 2504.608 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 21 2564.551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER SUBTOTAL - DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 1 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTSALLTYPES_ & SIZES) - 2 2104.521 SALVAGE CONCRETE 0108 CULVERT (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 3 2501.515 15"RCP FESW/1RASH GUARD - -, 4 2501.515 18"RCP FES WITRASH GUARD -- 5 2501,515 21"RCP FESVV/TRASH GUARD - 6 ' 2501.521 - 22" SPAN RCP CL. 5 ST0R1v1SEWER PIPE 7 - 2501.521 28"SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER 0108 8 2501.521 36" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE TKDA IJRESEL CONTRACTING R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE , AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ 130,080.08 ' $ 130,000,00 $ 180,000.00 $ $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 158.80 I $ $ 10000 $ 180.00 $ 50.00 $ 25,00 $ 165.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 1.75 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 $ 90.00 ,, 9.25 $ 1.10 $ 500.00 $ 1,600.00 2 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 6,400.00 9 2 - EA $ 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00$ 13 EA $ 4,200.00 $ 54,680.00 $ 13 - EA $ 1,140.80514,820.00 3 EA $ 1,665.00 $ 4,905.08 15 EA $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000.00 3 EA $ 17300 $ 519.00 18 - EA $ 353.00 $ 5,534.00 1 - EA $ 512,00 $ 512.00 3 EA - $ 267.00 $ 801.00 $ 18 EA $ 405.00 $ 7.290,00 $ 1 EA $ 570,00 $ 570.00 $ 135 LF $ 25.00 $ 3,375.00 $ 545 LF $ 29.00 $ 15,892.00 $ 45 LP $ 35.00 $ 1,575,00 $ 303 LF $ 36.00 $ 10,908.00 $ 52 LF $ 52.00 $2,704,00 $ 5954 LF $ 48.00 $ 285,792.08 $ 2435 LF $ 54.00 $ 131,40000 - - $ 4294 LFIS $ 7.80 5 33,493.20 1 $ 2 EA $ 37.00 i $ 74.00 1 $ -- $ 831,344,20.1 1018 LF $ 3.60 5 3,557,60 I $ 85 LF $ 10.30 $ 875.50 $ 4 EA $ 657.00 $ 2,568,00 - $ 4 EA - $ 713.00 $ -- - - 2,852,00 $ 6 EA 1 $ 778.00 $ 4,068.00 $ 47 LF $ 52,00 $ 2,444.00$ 40 LF $ 54M0$ 3,13800 $ 80 LF , $ 80,00 $ 4,800,00 $ $ 68,680.00 $ 24.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 500,00 $ 5,000.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 10,290.00 $ 1.75 $ 900.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 10000 $ 1,971.25 9.50 $ $ 18,111,50 $ 1.00 $ $ 2,015,00 $ 525.00 $ $ 368.00 $ 1,500.00 $ $ 241,035,75 , $ 100,000,00 150,00 $ 150,00 $ 65,856.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 7,600,00 $ 10,290.00 $ 900.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,400.00 2,023.50 16,455,00 1,764,08 345.00 213,743,50 3,450.00 $ 6,900.00 $ 6,000,00 $ 12,000.00 950.00 $ 1.900,00 '_$ 1,000.00 $ 2,000,00 3,500,00 $ 45,500.00 , $ 4,000,00 $ 52,000,00 1,625,00 $ 21,125.00 ' $ 1,100,00 $ 14,300,00 - 1,925.00 $ 5,775.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500,00 3,50000 $ 52,500,00$ 2,750.00 $ 41,250.00 22500 $ 675 00 $ 100,00 $ 300.00 425.00 $ 7,650,00 $ 250,00 $ 4,500.00 550.00 $ 550.00 $ 350.00 $ 350,00 - 250.00 $ 750.00 $ 200.00 ] $ 600.00 - 350.00 $ 6,300.00 $ 300,00 1 $ 5,400.00 500.00 $ 500.00 , $ 500.00 $ 500.00 - 14,00 $ 1,800.00 $ 18.00 $ 2,430.00 - 18.00 $ 9,864.00 1 $ 24,50 $ 13,426,00 22.00 $ 990.00 $ 32.00 f $ 1,440.00 25.00 $ 7,575,00 $ 28.00 1 $ 8,484 00 30.00 $ 1560.00 $ 34.50 $ 1,704,00 40.00 = $ 238,168,00 $ 42,00 $ 250,068.00 53,80 ' $ 129,055.00 $ 52,00 $ 128,620.00 3.85 . $ 16,531,00 $ 4,50 $ 19,323,00 8000 5 160,00 , $ 100,00 $ 200.00 - $ 555,910.90' $ 561,485,00 10,00 5 10,160,00 $ 6.00 I $ 6,096.00 20.00 $ 1,70000 $ 10.00 , $ 85000 650,00 $ 2,600.00 i $ 700,00 $ 2,800.00 850.00 $ 3,400.00 j $ - 800.00 $ 3,200.00 000.00 $ 5,400,001 $ 1,000,00 $ 6,000,00 55.00 $ 2,585,00 $ 46.00 $ 2,162.00 75 00 $ 3,675.00 $ 5600 $ 2,744,00 100,00 $ 5,000.001 $ 80,00 $ 4,600.00 Page 7 MN/DOT 80, 2501.525 2501.525 2501.525 2501.571 2502.521 2502,521 2503.5 t 1 2503.511 2503.51 1 2506,502 2506.601 251 1,501 251 1.501 KEATO AVENUE tv1SA STREET AND WATERIVAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMD, MINNESO!A TKDA PROJECT 80, 15230.000 MUNICIPAI. STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206105002 8105 OPENED APRIL 5,2013, AT 200 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION TEM 80 9 ID 11 13 14 5 16 17 18 19 20 21 DESCRIPTION 22' SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD 28" SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD 36' SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD INSTALL SALAVAOEO CONCRETE 0106 CIJLVERT(ALL TYPES & SIZES) 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT VV/ APRON 18"CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT W(APRON 5" RCP CL, 13 STORM SEWER PIPE 18" REP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 21" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 4065 INFILTRAF]0N BASIN CL. 3 RIPRAP VVI GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC CL. 4 RIPRAP W/ GE01EXTILE FILTER FABRIC SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4 - STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE 06 EXiST, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 22104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL FYPES) 3 2104.505 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN 5 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX 6 2104.523 SALVAGE POST& SIGN 7 2105,501 COMMON EXCAVATION (0) 11 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (C Vj, SPEC 349.26 9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FOR ROAD STA61L1ZA7105E MnD0r TYPE V 10 2106.607 SUBERADE CORRECTION 11 2112 501 SU8GRADE PREPAFIAfl0N(ROADWAY) 12 2211.501 CL,5AGGREGATE BASE 13 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 14 2360.501 SPWEA2406 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 15 2360.501 SPWEA240E1 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (DRIVES) 113 2360,502 SPNWB2308 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 17 2502,501 4" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 18 2502 541 4 PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN WI8ACKFILL 8 WRAP - 19 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE, FITTINGS. & STEEL CAP) 20 2502.602 ORAINT(LE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 21 2531.501 8418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 22 2531,602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 23 2531.602 CONCRETE CURB CUT 24 2531,602 6" CONCRETE FLUME 25 2531.618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 26 2540,602 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX 27 2554,602 PERMANENT BARRICADE 28 2564.531 INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C(INCLUDING POSTS 5 ASSEMBLY) 29 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 30 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS, TYPE C 31 2582 502 4 SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW EPDXY 32 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE- EPDXY 33 2582 502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW. EPDXY 34 2582.502 4"BROKEN LINE YELLOW. EXPDXY 35 2582 502 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW EPDXY SUBTOTAL TOTAL BASE BID QUANTITY 85 326 120 1213 6) 226 6 6 94.2 16.2 UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA CY CY 213 LF 6 EA 19710 SY 18 EA 20 66 *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINGER CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 787.00 $ 1,574.00 840,00 $ 1,680,00 1,100,00 $ 2,200.00 21.00 $ 1,785.00 38.00 $ 12388,00 41.00 5 4920,00 3200 $ 4,032.00 34.00 $ 2,074.00 38.00 $ 8,588.00 1975,00 $ 11,850.00 930.00 $ 5580.00 74.00 $ 6970.80 80,00 $ 1296.00 $ 90,038,90 $ 3,00 j 60.00 2.00 1$ 2800 $ 45.00 9 EA $ 28.00 19252 CY $ 7.00 8527 CY $ 12,50 300 SY $ 2.00 100 CY 65 RS $ 175.00 7534 '[8 $ 11,75 1044 GA $ 2.50 1867 TN $ 60,00 115 TN $ 100.00 3111 TN $ 60.00 6 EA $ 230.00 0083 LF $ 6.40 $ 26 EA $ 120,00 $ 10 EA $ 170.00 $ 1.700.00 12650 LF - 5 8.90 $ 112,585.00 EA $ 330.00 $ 330.00 38 EA 5 55.00 $ 2,090.00 112 SY $ 48,00 6 - - 3,938.00 8 SF $ 38.00 $ 304.00 20 - EA $ 80.00 j $ 1,600.00 EA $ 275.00 $ 275.00 18 EA $ 55,00 j $ 090.00 9 EA $ 55.00 i $ 495.00 117.00 SF $ 25.00 $ 2,925.00 4720 LF 5 0.50 . 5 2,360,00 12240 LF $ 0.25 : $ 3,060.00 755 LF $ 0.25 $ 188.75 1265 LE $ 0.25 $ 316.25 25 LF $ 4.80 5 120.00 $ 875422.20 $ 1,727,985,59 DRESEL CONTRACTING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 50000 , $ 1,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 1,00000 $ 725,00 $ 1,450.00 5 639.00 $ $ 360,00 $ 5 39,420.00 $ $ 504,00 $ 6 900.00 8 6 252.00 $ $ 134,754.00 $ $ 106,587.50 $ $600.00 5 $ 20.00 5 2,000,00 5 5 11,375.00 5 $ 811,524.50 . $ 6 2,610.00 5 6 112,020.00 - 5 11,500,00 , 5 $ 186,660,00 $ $ 1,380.00 5 38,931.20 $ 3,120.00 ' 6 $ 5 $ $ 5 $ 5 18 is 5 $ -I TKDA 8 L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 70000 $ 1,400,00 $ 1,000 00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,400.00 1 $ 2,800.00 2500 $ 2,125.00 5 20.00 $ 22.00 $ 3000 $ 22.00 $ 30,00 $ 32.00 $ 2,250.00 $ 4,500.00 5 125.00 $ 165.00 $ 7,172.00 $ 38.00 $ 3,600.00 S 40.00 6 2,772.00 5 32.00 $ 1,83000 $ 34.00 $ 7,232,00 $ 38.00 $ 13,500.00 5 2,400,00 $ 27,000.00 $ 2,000.00 - $ 11,775.00 $ 52.00 5 2,673 00 $ 62.00 $ 118,649.00 $ 1,700.00 12,388.00 4,800.00 4,032.00 2,074.00 8,5811.00 14.400,00 12,000.00 5,840,40 1,004.40 101678.80 3.00 $ 639.00 $ 4.00 5 852,00 100.00 $ 600.00 $ 200.00 S 1200.00 2.00 $ 39,420.00 $ 2,50 5 40,275,00 25.00 $ 450.00 .1 50,00 , $ 900.00 40,00 $ 800,00 , $ 25.00 5 500.00 30,00 $ 27000 $ 50.00 8 450.00 7,00 $ 134,764.00 $ 7.50 j 5 144,390.00 9,50 $ 81,006.50 1 $ 16,00 $ 136,432.00 - 2.00 $ 600.00 8 4.00 1 S 1,200.00 5.00 5 1,500.00 j $ 15,00 $ 1,500,00 100.00 $ 6,500,00 $ 100.00 $ 6,500.00 12.00 $ 90,408,00 $ 15.50 $ 116,777.00 2.35 $ 2,453.40 $ 2.50 5 2,61000 55,00 $ 102,685.00 $57,50 $ 107,352.50 92.00 $ 18,580.00 j $ 95.00 $ 10,925,00 55.00 $ 171,105.00 --57,50 j $ 178.8112.50 150,00 I, $ 900.00 $ 200.00 1 $ 1,200.00 10,00 $ 60,830.00 $ 8.00 1 $ 48,664.00 6000 $ 1,560,00 1 $ 250.00 j $ 0,50000 100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 250,00 $ - 2,500.00 8.25 $ 104,362,50 1 $ 8.75 $ 110,687.50 400,00 $ 400.00 1 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 30.00 $ 1,140.00 $ 6.00 :, 228.00 39.00 $ 3,198.00 $ 42.00 $ 3,444.00 47,00 $ 376.00 - $ 40,00 $ 320.00 80.00 $ 1,600.00 $ 40,00 S 800,00 260.00 $ 260.00 $ 250.00 S 250,00 65.00 .1,170.00 , $ 125,00 $ 2,250.00 80.00 $540.00 , $ 100.00 $ 900.00 25.00 $ 2,925.00 $ 16.00 $ 1,872.00 0.45 $ - 2,124.00$ 0.65 $ - 3,068.00 0.22 $ 2,692.80 $ 0.35 $ 4,284.00 0,23 1 $ 173.65 -0.35 $ 264 25 0.23 J $ 290.95 - $ 0.10 $126.50 - 5.00 I $ 125.00 $ 18,00 $ 400,00 1 $ - 829,448.50 $ 948,004,25 $ 1,745,044,45 $ 1,824,911,55 Page 8 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230000 MUNICIPAL STALE AID PROJECT NIJMRER 206.105002 1310S OPENED: APRIL 9, 2013, AT 2:00 PM DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNl ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504602 DEDUCT I2"WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 2504602 16" WATERMAIN OFFSET 3 2504902 DEDUCT 12" GATE VALVE & BOX 4 2504602 16" BUFFEIOFLYVALVE 5 2504603 DEDUCT 12' DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 6 2504603 16" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 7 2504603 DEDUCT 12" HOPE ER, 1(DIPS), BY HDD 8 2504603 16" HDPE DR. 11(DIPS), 9YHDD 9 2504608 DEDUCT 12" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 10 2504608 16" MJ DIP COMPACT FITF(NGS SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. 1 2 13 13 5915 5915 2435 2435 3200 5438 EA $ (3,200.00) 5 (6,40000) EA $ 4.50000 $ 9,000,00 EA $ (3,001.33) 5 (39,01720) EA $ 2,952.35 6 38,380,94 LF 6 (48 00) 5 (283,920.00) LF $ 61,50 $ 363,772.50 LF $ (54,00) $ (131,490.00) LF $ 82,00 $ 199,670.00 EA 5 (7.00) $ (24,960.00) EA $ 6,75 $ 36,706.50 $ 161742.65 $ 1,889,731,24 1 TKDA 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINGER CONSTRUCTION DRESEL CON1'RACTING R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ (3,450.00) $ (6,900.00)$ (6,000.00). $ (12,000.00)i $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 5 8,500.00 5 17,000.00 $ (3,500.00) $ (45,500.00) - , 5 (2,750.00) 5 (35,750.001 $ 5,250.00 $ 68,250.00 5 2,750.00 $ 35,750.00 5 (40.00) $ (236,600.00) 5 (42.00) $ (248,430.00 5 56.00 $ 331,240.00 5 56.00 $ 331,240.00 $ (53.00) $ (120,055.00) 5 (52.00) .6.00) $ - 73.00 $ 177,755.00 5 85.001 5 206,075.00 $ (3.85) 5 (12,320.00) $ (4.50) $ ((4,400.00) $ 4,50 $ 24,471,00 $ 5.50 $ 29,909,00 $ 181,341.00 $ 183,674,00 $ 1,926,385,45 $ 2,008,585,55 Page 9 PROJECT SCHEDULE ENGINEERING, inc. CamGeheren P.E, Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan &empskiP.[. [had |sakson, P.E. Project Title: Keats MSAStreet and Trunk VVatenna/n Improvements Client: City ofLake E|nop Project No.: I012.129 Date: Revised April 9, 2013 651.300.4261 651.300.4264 651.300.4267 651.300A283 October Z,2OIZ Improvement Hearing. Council authorizes the preparation ofPlans and Specifications. November 7,20l3 Council approves selection ofEngineering Consultant for design services. December llIO1I Workshop onTrunk VVaternlainLateral Benefit Assessments. March 5,2Ol3 City Engineer presents Plans and Specifications for Council approval. April 9,2Ol3 Receive Contractor Bids. April 16,ZDl3 City Council accepts bids and awards Contract. May Z7,ZOl3 Issue Notice toProceed, Contractor begins Work. August 3[\IO13 Substantial Completion date for Work [includes paving and restorationl. October 4,2Ol3 Final Completion date for Work [including all punch list itennsl. KE ELMO MAYOR AND COUNC DATE: REGULAR ITEM : MOTION COMMUNICATION 04/16/2013 17 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Distribute an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Lenriar Residential Development (Savona) SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Den A. Zuleger, City Administrator Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item Staff Report/PresentationStaff Questions from Counci] to Staff............................................................ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, ifAppropriate................................................................... Mayor Facilitates Ca11 for Motion..............................................................................Mayor R. City Council Discussion......................................................................................Mayor & City Council Action 011 Motion................................................................................... Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY' STATEMENT The City Council must decide whether or not to authorize a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for distribution and publication in the EQB Monitor FISCAL IMPACT: None — Westwood Engineering, working under the direction of Lennar Corporation, is preparing the EAW. Staff has been involved in reviewing the work of the developer's consultant. SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is being asked to authorize distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) that has heen prepared for the proposed Lermar Corporation residential subdivision (Savona) located within the h94 Corridor planning area and immediately west of Keats Avenue. The City Council has previously detennined that an EAW is required for the proposed Lenriar residential subdivision and that this document should be prepared under the direction of the City of Lake Elmo acting as the RGU (Responsible Governing Unit). Staff recommends the City Council authorize distribution of the mandatory EAW starting the 30-day EAW public comment period and take the following action / with the following motion: "Motion to authorize distribution of the mandator' EA Wfor the Savona residential subdivision starting the 30-day EA Wpublic comment period. " BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Lennar's project engineer, Westwood Engineering, has prepared the attached EAW and related traffic study in accordance with the guidelines of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, which is the organization that oversees the State's environmental review program. Staff has reviewed the document and any requested modifications to the draft document have been incorporated into the attached EAW materials. Under State rules, an EAW must be published in the EQB Monitor as part of the review process. The EQB Monitor is a biweekly publication that announces environmental review documents, public comment periods, and other actions of the Environmental Quality Board. Once published in the EQB Monitor, there is a 30 day comment period during which public agencies and members of the public may comment on the proposed project. The City must further distribute the EAW to a mailing list containing all responsible parties required to receive a copy of an EAW or EIS. At the end of the 30-day comment period, the City must adopt a resolution that finds an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is or is not required for the project. If an EIS is 1101 found to be necessary, the euvironnienia] review process is complete and the developer can proceed with platting and development within the project area. In this case, Lennar has already submitted a preliminary plat application for the Savona Subdivision and recognizes that the City will not be able to take formal action on the plat application until the environrncntal review is complete. The preliniinary plat application may proceed simultaneously with the EAW review. STAFF REPORT: Staff has reviewed the EAW document and has worked with the developer's consultant 10 incorporate all requested changes into the attached worksheet. During the course of the review, it was determined that a traffic impact study would be required, and this study has also been prepared and is attached for consideration by the City Council. Staff has found that the EAW is complete and addresses the minimum requirements for submission to the EQB. Should the City Council take action to authorize the distribution of the EAW, the document could be published in the April 29t11 edition of the EQB Monitor, with the 30-day continent period ending on May 30, 2013. STAFF MENDATIOI": Based upon the above background information and Staff report it is recommended that the City Council authorize distribution of the mandatory EAW starting the 30-day EAW public comlnent period with the following motion: "/3Iotion to authorize distribution of the inandato' EA LVfor the Savona residential subdivision sta►tina the 30-day EA Wpublic continent period." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Enviromnenial Assessment Worksheet — Savona EAW 2. Traffic Irnpacl Study — Savona EAW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota April 3, 2013 Prepared For: Lennar 16305 36th Ave. N., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Prepared By: This page intentionally left blank. '�� �������0������������7[��d����|���7� `^` ~ �"�~^^`^`^��^,~'°�� ' �`"^^"�^,^,^`""�^.^ ~ ~ ~,"�"�^^^°^�^�" (EA avo a CONTENTS ListofExbibdu--.................... ----.---....... —..... ..... ............. --............ ... ........ ii List of Appendices ...... ..... ___ ....... ----...... ____ ........ ....... --------...... ----'ii \, Project Title .................... .............. ........ ____ .... —...... .......... .................................. —| 3. DGU--............... ...... ... —..... ......... ....... .......... —.... ___ ............ —........ —....... ........ ) 4. Reason for EAlVPreparation ........ --......... ............................... —......... ...... ----| 5. Project Location ...... —................... ........... ...... ......................... —................... ----�l h, knn---...... --....... .... ........ ........ ...... —.... ...... '.... --....... ----....... .2 7� Project Magnitude Data ........... ..................... .......... ........... .............. ---------] & Pen -nits and Approvals Required ... -----.-------....... .......... --................ —4 9. Land Use ........ —............. ................. --........... ................. ........ .................................. .5 10. Cover Types ............ ...... ..... ___ ........... --......................... ............ ...... -----...... M ||. Fish, Wildlife, and EcologicallySensitive Reaou,cco--............ ............. -----....... 8 12. PhysicalImpacts noWater Resources ---................ .... ..... .......... ............ ....... .... l0 |I Water Use ...................... —....... ...... ................... ........... -----...... ...... ---..... ll 14. Water -Related Land Use MonuyenncotDistrict .............................. ...... --.......... —.... l2 15. Water Surface Use .............. ............ ...... ............................................................. ........ lZ 16. Erosion and Sedimentation_ .......... -----.............. —...... ...... —................... ___ |2 IT Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff ..... .................... .................. .—......... ...... .......... ]3 18. Water Quality: Wastewaters .................... ___ ............ ................... —.............. —... —... |5 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions ........ ...... .... ... .......... ........................ ............. l0 20i Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, and Storage Tanks .......... ---............................... |9 21. TrnOlc--... -------...... ___ ............................... ........................ ........................ 20 22. Vehicle -Related Air Emissions ....................... ..................... —........................................ 23 23� Stationary Source Air Endooiono—.................................. ... ....... .... ..... ............ ....... 2] 24. Odors, Noise and IJux—...... ........... ....... ............................. ---........... ................ Z3 2lNearby Re000,cnu'.... ............... ........ —.......................................... ....... ........ —..... 24 26. Visual knnoots--.................................... —....... ----......... .................................... 25 27. Compatibilitywith Plans and Land Use —... —.................. ----........... _25 28, Impact ouInfrastructure and Public Services ?5 29� Cumulative Impacts .............. ........................... ....................... ---....... —......... .26 30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts ................. ......... ---........ —_--....... —]6 8.1 Permits and Approvals Required. ................... ............. '.............. --...... ................ 4 10.1 Estimated Before and After Cover Types .... ............................... --...... ................ 8 10.1 Wastewater Production Predicted ....... —.......... ............ ................................ —.... l5 19.1 Soils C|aunficudon.--.............................. ...... --- ...................... —.......... ........ ....... l7 21.1 Trip Generation 5ununary---........ ........... .............. ----...... ......... ----'2\ EXHIBITS SiteLuowduo—.... ...... --------------.------------------.--...... { 0SGSTopography ...... ---'—......... ------....... —...... —........................ ------2 ProposedSite Ybn... ........... ....... --- ...... --------......... .-----------'----3 Adjacent Land Use ..... —.... ..... --- .......... ............ ------...... --------....... —.—.4 CoverType Mapping ........ .... —... ...... ......... ----------.--........ ............... --.-..5 ZoningMan --- .... ........ -----.---...... ....... —.......... ---_--........ --- ..... —h Water Resources Mapping -----..-----------------------------7 SoilsMapping ..... -... ... —.......... —................... ................ ......... -----....... ... ........... 0 APPENDICES ljcadhTest Pit Location Mun... ----------...... ....... ....... ....... ...... —.... .... ...... A DN}lNatural Heritage Database Search ............... ----------...... —......... ............ ... D County Well Index Well Log ..... —......... ---...... ------......... —...... ......... --- ........... [ State Historic yroacn/u1iouOffice Correspondence ----------------------I) TrafficImpact Study. ....................... ..... ................... ....... .......... ---- ..... ......... ... ......... E ii Version lOMrev NVIRONMENTAL SSESSMENT ORKSHEET (EA vo Note to preparers: This form and EAV' Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website The Environmental Assessment \Vorkslieel provides information about a projecl that may have the potential for significant environmental et'fects. The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Enironrnerita1 lrnpact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessihle data for — but should not complete the final worksheet. The complete question as well as the answer must he included if the EAW is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: ('onirnents must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB iivniror. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title: 2. Proposer: Contact person: Title: Address: Phone: E-mail Savona EAW Lenn ar Joe Jablonski Development Area Manager 16305 361h Ave, N, Ste. 600 Plymouth, MN 55446-427() (952) 249-3014 NA joe.jab1onksiI ennar.com 4. Reason for EAW Preparation 3. RGU: Contact person: Title: Address: Phone: Fa: E mail City of Lake Elmo Kyle Klatt Planning Director 3800 Laverne Ave. Norih Lake Etmo, MN 55042 (651)747-3911 (651) 747-3901 kk1att(1akee1uio.org © EIS Scoping l Mandatory EAW 0 Citizen Petition 0 RGU Discretion 0 Proposer Volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart numbers(s) Part 4410.4300 Subp. 19.D., Residential Development 5. Project Location County: Washington Couiity, Minnesota City: Lake Elmo Twp: T29N. R2IW. S34 GPS Coordinates: 44.954093,-92.9 13716 (Proiect Center) Tax Parcel Numbers: 34.029.21.41.0004: 34.029.21.42.0001: 34.029.21.34.0001: 34.029.21.34.0003: 34.029.21.31.0001 (All tax parcels within overall Droiect site are listed.) Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location ol' the precI: See Exhibit 1. • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project houndaries (photocopy acceptable): See Exhibit 2. • Site l)lafl showing all significanl project and natural features. See Exhibit 3. Savona EAW April 3. 2013 6. Description a) P,oiido a J?rofc1 suintnary of5() nords or less to he puhlis/ied in 1he EOB 1lonitor. The Savona residential development is proposed on approximately 1 12.5 acres of primarily agricultural land in the southern portion of Lake Elmo. The project is proposing 190 single-family lots, and 122 multi -family lots. Twenty-seven acres of open space is also planned, which will include buffers, parks, woods and ponds. /) Gi'.' a coiiiplcle descripiioi cif the proposed project and related weir cons1ruc1on. Attach additional as necessary. ,Emj,hasi:c' coflslructfofl, operation methods, and /af11res Ilia! u'i11 L'al(se physical nlullipli/ation of the e,niron,nenl or trill produce nasles. Iiu'li,do /nocfificaiun7s to evistiiig cquipmcnl ar industrial processes and significant demolition, i'enioial. or remodeling of existing slrucliii'es. Indicate the timing (117(1 ciivafloti of cohlslrii 11011 (1C1iVi1ieS, Lennar is proposing construction of single and multi -family residential development on approximately 1 12.5 acres of land. The two parcels that constitute the project are referred to as the Dale (west) and Frandsen (east) Properties, and are approximately 72.5 and 40 acres in size, respectively, The proposed project is located in the S ¼ of Section 34, T29N, R2 1 W, City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota (Exhibits 1 & 2), and is generally located south of 10 Street North (CSAH 10) and west of Keats Avenue North (CSAI-1 19). Project development will convert approximately 112.5 acres of agricultural fields, woodlands, and constructed ponds 10 streets, homes, lawns, landscaping, parkland, trails, and stomiwaler ponding. Land use within the site will include construction ofup to 190 single-family lots, and 122 imilii- family townhorne units. Development plans feature 65 to 75-foot wide single-family lots and 28 foot -wide residential streets. The proposed project will have an overall net density of 4,0 units per acre. Potential adverse effects on the environment will be mitigated by preserving and creating approximately 27 acres of open space in the form of buffers, parks, woodlands, and ponds. The project proposes extensive landscaping, huffering, and benning along adjacent roadways 10 offset possible visual impacts. Each residential lot will be served by City of Lake Elmo sanitary sewer and water systems. No onsite sewage systems and no private wells are proposed. Public streets will service the development including the construction of minor collector roadway 10 serve the development, directing traffic east 10 Keats Aveuue for convenient access 10 the 1-94 colTidor. The Metropolitan Council recently approved an amendment 10 the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Laud Use Plan. Under the amended plan, the city agreed 10 provide an additional 6,600 Residential Equivalent Connections (RECs) of regional sewer service by 2030. In a 2005 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Metropolitan Council, the city agreed to meet or exceed an average residential density of three units per acre in sewered areas south of 10n Street. Sewered development will be limited to the city's Village area (area surrounding the historic Lake Elmo Village) and the area south of 10th Street along Interstate 94. The proposed development of the study area is consistent with the total level of density guided by the MOU and Land Use Plan. The City of` Lake Elmo 1-94 Corridor Development Staging Plan map (July 2012) indicates tliat the project area falls within the Stage 1 area. While a specific time period has not been attached 10 these stages, the stages are intended to develop in numeric order from Stage Ito Stage 111. Stage 1 represents new sewered development located west of Keats Avenue that will connect 10 the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Woodbury, Oakdale, Northdale and East Oakdale (WONE) interceptor. Savona EAW April 3,2013 Construction It is anticipated that the project will be constructed in six phases, with the first phase expected to begin in 2013. Full build -out is anticipated in 2018; however, construction timing will ultimately depend upon market conditions. li is anticipated that construction will entail moving approximately 750,000 cubic yards of soil. Construction dewatering may be conducted on an as -needed and permitted basis 10 install sanitary sewer, municipal water, and siorni sewer. Best Management Practices will be implemented during and after construction to protect water quality and reduce the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation. c) Evplain the project p.1117)ose: if the Jv/ecf rsif/ he Carried oul by a governnlouro/ imir, c.vplain the uee'cl lnr the pro/ecl anc/ icicnlifv [Is hc,ieficia,?es. The purpose of the Savona residential development project is to meet the demand for additional residential housing units within the City of Lake Elmo in accordance with the signed 2005 MOU between the City and the Metropolitan Council. Under this MOU, the City of Lake Elmo committed 10 adding 6,600 new RECs of regional sewer service by the year 2030. The city also committed to a city-wide population of 24,000 by the year 2030. This project will help meet the city's obligations as outlined within the MOU by providing an additional 312 living units along the 1-94 corridor. The project will be constructed and implemented by Lennar, a private developer. d) i-lre/ulure stages of t/itiv development planned or fikely 10 happen? ©Yes LiVo, /ies. hrieflr d(5C/ihC/i(1IfF0 S1U'0S, tclutioishij 10 t/lt' pees(';Ilpfof 001, Onie/oie, caul plans for e;n'ironme,,ial rerien. ['here are currently no planned future stages of the Lake Elmo Property residential development project. 0) Is the project a subsequent stage qlan earlier pro/ect? 0 }'s �?Vo. If1'es, hriefli describe the past c/t've/opnlenr, lilne/ine, and wn pclst 071%'i/Oflfl!C')lIOl reiien. The Savona residential development project is not a subsequent stage of an earlier development project. 7. Project Magnitude Data Total Project Acreage 112.5 Maximum Units per Number of Residential Units: Unattached 190 Attached 122 Building N/A Comrnerciat. Industrial, or Institutional Building Area (gross floor space): total square feet N/A Indicate area ofspecific uses (in square feet): Retail!Oflice N/A Other Industrial N/A Warehouse N/A Institutional N/A Light Industrial N/A Agricultural N/A Manufacturing N!A Other Commercial (specify) N/A Building Height 1-2 stories: 35 maximum. Savona EAW April 3. 2013 IF over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings N/A 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all k,uju,i local, state, andfc1era1 pe/'nhits. approiiis, ancl financial assistoiicetor tiu' profect. 1/?CI1(cic FflVdificatiOiV of cnn evisting permits. gori'nnucnral review otplaus, ac1 all direct arid indirect forms o/pnhlw jinauciaf assistance ii luding hond g1iara/itc. Tax Jncrcincnt Financing. and in[i'astrucrure, .411 of these final decisions are nvohthrted until all 0vprv17ri01e _'in'i;vnniental rericrr has heen coinph'tcd. See Mwnesota Rules. Chapter 4410.3100. Table 8.1. Permits and Approvals Required Unit of Government City ofLake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Ehno City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo Washington County Washington County Washington County Washington County Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of llealih Minnesota DNR Division of Waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Pollution Control Agency U. S. Arrny Corps of Engineers MN DNR Division of Waters MN Pollution Control Agency Type of Application Status Concept Plan Approval Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval EAW Negative Declaration Grading Pennit Building Permit Municipal Water Connection Pennit Sanitary Sewer Connection Pennit Rezoning Wetland Delineation Confirmation Wetland Conservation Act No -Loss Determination Right -of -Way Pennit Access Pennit Obstruction Permit Transportation Permit Sanitary Sewer Connection Perini Water Main Extension Approval Water Appropriation Permit N1DES / SDS Sanitary Sewer Extension Approval Section 404/Letter of No Jurisdiction Water Appropriation Pennit(s) NPDES/SDS General Permit 4 Completed To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To he applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) Applied for Applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for To be applied for Applied for 'I'o be applied for if needed Covcred under genera] pennit submit NO1 prior to Savona EAW Valley Branch Watershed District South Washington Watershed District 9. Land Use construction. Watershed Review/Permit To be applied for Watershed Review/Pennit To be applied for April 3, 2013 Describe ctirre,i! 00c1 ii'cen1 pas! land IISe and cl&rclopineiir 011 th. ,city and 00 adjacent lanc/s. Discuss t/i' com1;atih,Iiti of iiie project with adjacent and nearby /0/111 uses. Indicate ¶!hn/her 11!/V /.)0tC1)liaf conflicts ill!'OIVe ern iro)!/!lai!101 11!!!rrS Idc'nlitr QfliJ)OtC!1110/ C!1!'lronlnel!tlll /)(1:1I/CI clue to P' Site !LCS, such 05 501/ contanunatwn or abandoned storage tankv, orproxiinitv to nror/'r hazardous liquid or gas pipe/inl's. Existing Land Use within the Project Site Existing land use within, and adjacent to, the project site is depicted in Exhibit 4 and summarized in Section 10 below. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the project area in October 2012 by Liesch Associates, Inc. (Liesch). The report indicates that according to historic aerial photography dating from 1936 10 2008, the Dale Property has been under agricultural production since at least 1936. Recent aerial photography (2008) indicates the Dale Property remains under agricultural use; the Frandsen parcel was converted to a golf practice facility, Mulligan Masters, on or around 2002. The golf business is no longer in operation. No farmsteads or buildings are currently located on the property aside for a small plastic storage shed on the Frandsen parcel. A transmission line extends along the northern project houndary, and Liesch observed a gas pipeline on the Frandsen Parcel. The site culTently contains 61.2 acres of cropped field, 1.4 acres of developed area/roads, 33.5 acres ofgolf course driving range, 9.4 acres of upland meadow, 1.8 acres of excavated pond, and 5.2 acres of upland woodland (Exhibit 5). Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses Tlie Lake Elmo Zoning Map is provided on Exhibit 6. The Dale property is currently zoned 1-ID- RR-SRD, which is Rural Residential Sewered Residential Holding District. The Frandsen property is currently zoned HD-A-SRD, which is Agricultural Sewered Residential Holding District. Both parcels are planned and staged for sewered residential development, but will require rezoning to Urban Low Density Residential (LDR) and Urban Medium Density Residential (MDR) prior 10 project approvals. The properties are located within the 1-94 development corridor, which is one of two focused locatious within the city for future housing expansion and increased housing density. This will allow existing open space within the rural planning districts of take Elmo 10 be maintained, along with the overall rural flavor of the city. The project is compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses. Surrounding land use (Exhibit 4) is primarily residential development to the northinorthwest, gravel mining to the north/northeast, agricultural land and Keats Avenue 10 the east, the 1-94 corridor to the south, small businesses 10 the southwest, and agricultural land and a business park to the west. The proposed project will fit into the 1-94 construction corridor as a separate but similar land use to existing land uses in the area. As described in the amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan, this portion of the city is guided as an "urbanized zone" that will feature higher density residential development and commercial uses. The proposed project is consistent with the land use guidance. Natural buffer strips, located adjacent to 5 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 existing rural development, are proposed along the periphery of the Savona residential development 10 provide a transition zone between the new project and existing land uses in the area. Environmental Hazards Associated with Past Land Use Prior 10 2002, the project site was undeveloped and used for agricultural crop production. In 2002. the Frandsen portion of the property (eastern 40 acres) was converted to a golf practice facility, Mulligan Masters, A search on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Web site (What's In My Neighborhood?") revealed no known potential sources of soil or groundwater contamination. This database contains properties that have already been investigated and cleaned up through federal and state cleanup programs, as well as those cun•ently enrolled in MPCA cleanup programs. The database also includes properties that were thought to be contaminated, but after further investigations were detennined 10 be clean. Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment completed by Liesch revealed no recognized environmental conditions (RECs) on the properties except for seven observed areas containing evidence of dumping, and surficial debris including: appliances, quart -sized oil containers (empty), metal debris/pieces, rusted drums, plastic containers, crushed PVC pipe, a couch, mattresses, televisions, tires, wood scrap/debris, a chiller unit, glass containers, asphalt piles, soil piles, concrete piles, drain tile, plastic posts, and trasli. Liesch's report indicated that "although the drums and COfltai/1e1W uerc' en;prt'. and no ohvious staining HUS obsened in the ''icinitj of the containers, there is /o1e/1l1al tluii the original eontcnls of the containers ,nay hcn•e impacted the Propertv s/sux,f,cc'. The potential for six! vxirtica i!npacts fro;n tlic appliances, 1e1'vis,ons, aiici d,x,nxs crud containers ofsc'j-icd... is coiisiderec/ a REC. As a result, Liesch recommended a Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment to assess the dump areas identified during the Phase 1 ESA, and indicated that "debris should he munaga(1 (1/1(1 diSpOS((/ 0/ properi according 10 ('ilr. ('ounf', curd State regulations. In addition 10 the dump areas, Liesch observed the following items of environmental note: • An irrigation well located on the Frandsen Parcel. Liesch reconiniended that the well be sealed according to the Minnesota Department of Health well code if it is no longer in use. The well is located in a Special Well Construction Area as identified by the MPCA, • A septic system with a drain field is present on the Frandsen Parcel. but is no longer in use. Liesch recommended that the septic system be removed / abandoned according to local code requirements. • Suspect asbestos -containing material (ACM) was not observed on the Property during the site walk -over. However, suspect ACM may be present among debris observed on the Properly. Phase 11 Environmental Site Assessment A Phase 11 ESA was completed for lhe site as recommended during the Phase 1 process. Based upon the environmental conditions noted, Liesch completed the following scope of services as part of the subsurface Phase 11 ESA: (1) prepared a health and safety plan and cleared public and private utilities, (2) excavated 17 test pits throughout areas A, C, and D on the Property to assess for huried 6 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 debris and potential environmental impacts due to the presence of appliances, televisions, drums, and containers in these areas, (3) screened soil samples for the presence of organic vapors using a plioloionizalion detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 electron volt (eV) lamp. (4) collected five soil samples for laboratory analysis of diesel range organics (DRO) (analyzed by silica gel method), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated bipheriyls (PCBs), and pesticides, (5) observed debris for suspect asbestos containing material (ACM), and (6) prepared a Phase 11 ESA report with conclusions and recommendations. Work performed for the Phase 11 ESA included observing and field screening recovered soil samples, and collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis from soil test pits. Based upon the findings of the Phase 11 ESA, Liesch confinned that the dehris observed on the Property is mainly surficial. The only areas of deeper debris included concrete in test pit TP-1 1 and asphalt pieces in test pit TP-12 to approximately 4 feet below grade. General municipal waste was observed to 1.5 feet below grade in test pits TP-15 and TP-16 and to 1 foot below grade in test pits T1'-4 and TP-7. Liesch test pit locations are shown in Appendix A. In the RCRA metal analysis, arsenic concentrations were detected above the Residential SRV ol'9 mg/kg ranging from 9,2 to 19.9 mg/kg. The Liesch Phase 11 report indicales that they suspect these concentrations to be within the range of naturally -occurring concentrations for this area. From a regulatory perspective, the MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program has not required remedial efforts for arsenic concentrations just above the Residential SRV if the data supports background concentrations, This contention is supported by MPCA Fact Sheet: Best Management Practices for the Off -Site Reuse of Excess Fill from Development Sites dated February 2012, in which the MPCA states that"Naturally occurring concentrations of some metais, such as arsenic, seleniuni, or copper sometimes exceed the SRV or SLV. Such soils are not considered impacted in the absence of contaminant source or other field or laboratory indications of contamination." As noted above. the same assertion would be applicable to the selenium concentrations detected on the Property. The detection of DRO at 153 mg/kg in TP-15 (1') indicates the presence ol' low level petroleum impacts in the vicinity of TP-15. The extent and magnitude of the DRO impacted soil is unknown. Based upon the findings, Liesch recommended the following: hiforrn the Property owner of the release of DRO as detected on the Property, and prepare a Construction Contingency Plan to detail management ofdehris and impacted soils during development. Lennar will prepare a Construction Contingency Plan for the site prior 10 site development to manage known debris and impacted soils within the project area. However, the primary areas where test borings were completed will be largely undisturbed in the final development p]an (Appendix A). The northernmost area (Area A) is located within an existing transmission line easement, and will therefore be largely avoided. Areas C is predominantly located within a tree and open space preservation area, and about 50 percent of Area D will he preserved and avoided by the project design. Local Soil and Groundwater Contamination Ferfiuorocheinical (PFC)-containing wastes were disposed of at two land disposal sites, the 3M- Oakdale Disposal Site in Oakdale and the former Washington County Landfill in Lake Elmo, Minnesota between 1956 and 1974. The Oakdale disposal site is located approximately 3,8 nii1cs northwest of the project area, and the Washington County Landfill is located approximately 3.4 miles to the north. 7 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 PFCs were released from the two facilities resulting in contamination of groundwater and nearby drinking water wells as outlined in a Public Health Assessment prepared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (August 29, 2008), and the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR), The Minnesota Department of Health (MDI-I) has detected PFCs in several surface waterbodies in the Lake Elmo, Oakdale. and Woodbury area through various sampling studies. Surface water hodies north of the project area that have been found to contain PFCs include: Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake, and Lake Elmo. PFCs are suspected to infiltrate into the groundwater from these water body sources. Sunfish Lake was found to contain perfluorobutanoate (PFBA). Goose Lake, located 0.25-miles north of the project area, was sampled by the MDH in 2010 and was found 10 contain no PFCs. According to this Public Health Assessment, PFCs have been detected in public and private wells across a wide area of Oakdale and Lake Elmo. in Lake Elmo, approximately 200 homes were connected to municipal water 10 mitigate exposure to PFCs in the groundwater. Additional homes, approximately 55, have had in home granular activated carbon filter systems installed to mitigate exposure to PFCs in the groundwater. These homes have also been offered bottled drinking water. Groundwater monitoring of PFCs is an ongoing program. The proposed project will mitigate risks to new residents by providing access to municipal drinking water. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acr'age cftl:e site ii/:h each of the folioning eoier rpes before awl a/ier de)elopinent. Table 10.1. Estimated Before and After Cover Types land Cuvcr Cropped field Developed/Road Golf Club/Driving Range Upland Meadow Excavated Pond Upland Woodland Stormwater ponds Totals Before (a 61.2 1.4 33.5 9.4 1.8 5.2 0.00 112.5 e After (acres 0.0 85.5 0.0 20,0 0.0 2.0 5.00 112.5 ifBefore wul After totals are not equal. explain win: Before and after totals are equal. 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a) Identi'fi•/iis/r and n'i/d/fc' resources aril huhjt(ITS ofl or near the site and desc,rihe I,ou t/k'v mould be at? tied bv the ,projecf. Descrihe am m>asu;,es re be taken to ininimize or aroid ilnpcicts. Fish and wildlife resources on and near the site are directly related to the composition, quality, size, and connectivity of natural communities including woodlands, wetlands, and grasslands. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. used aerial photography to map the existing cover types (Exhibit 5). Based on this analysis, the site contains four major habitat components: 61.2 acres of cropped field, 9.4 acres of upland meadow, 1.8 acres of excavated pond, and 5.2 acres of upland woodland. These Savona EAW April 3. 2013 habitats are used by a variety of animals common 10 central Minnesota. Wildlife resources that exist throughout the site likely include those species that have adapted to open lands and cropland habitats such as pheasant, meadowlark, field sparrow, cottontail, red fox, and white-tailed deer. The open fields provide seasonal food and cover for these species. Project development is expected 10 convert approximalelyl00 acres of cropped field, upland meadow, golfcourse/driving range, upland meadow, excavated pond and upland woodland. Preservation of approximately 27 acres of upland woodland, upland meadow, and stoniwater ponding is expected to mitigate some of the adverse effects on wfldlifc. Connections between existing meadow/o]d field and woodlands will be maintained in the development by retaining buffer strips along the property edges, which will allow travel corridors 10 remain for use by wildlife on the property and from off -site resource areas. Conversion of agricultural fields, woodlands, and meadow/old field to residential development is expected to result in some local decline in wildlife abundance. Populations of species that depend upon cropland, woodland and fields, such as ring-necked pheasanrs, wild turkey, and meadowlarks, will likely be displaced. Migratory birds are expected to respond 10 the development by looking for alternative nesting sites upon their return from wintering habitats. Some songbirds that readily adapt to suburban habitats may become more numerous. Non -migratory species with small home ranges such as small mammals will experience more adverse effects. These species will compete with other individuals of the same or other species 10 claim territories in neighboring habitats or succumb 10 mortality during project construction. Approximately 24 percent of the 1 12.5-acre project area will be open space, which is expected 10 help mitigate adverse effects on wildlife. The project is not expected to result in a regionally significant decline in wildlife abundance or species diversity. Measures 10 reduce the effects on wildlife include preservation of buffers and adjacent woodland integrated with open space and parkland, and construction of stonnwater ponding. These measures are expected to provide additional habitat for wildlife and help initigate adverse effects on some wildlife. [0 Are ((10' sloh-IiStecl (endaigered, threwened, or spciuI concern) species, rare piont coinlnunifies or ruler sensitiie ecological ;esourccs on or near the site? 0 Yes 0 No 1/ rv, c/rvcribe the resource and irurr 17 (ou/d he af/Lc1ed 1'i ulia pro/ecu. Describe cnn measures that will be token to ,nininiize vi, aroid cidi'erse inlpocrs. Provide the Iicensc agreement nu,;,bcr ancl/or Di?sion o/ Ecological Resoure ,v contact nwnber (#ERDB 20130158)f,on, wineli the data acre ohtainec/ and attach rl,e response. letter ton( the DNR Division of Ecological RCSOUrCeS. indicate if arm' athli(u)(Ial sun ens wo,* has been conducted within the site uncl de,rcrihe the results. The Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Program conducted a database search of the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) 10 determine if there are listed plants and animals; native plant communities; wildlife aggregations; geological features; or state rare features that are known to occur within or near the project site. The database search did not identify rare features within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed project. The DNR Natural 1-leritage Review response letter is provided in Appendix 1. Based on the nature and location of the proposed project, the DNR concluded that it does not believe the project will negalivety affect any known occurrences of rare features. Therefore, no additional survey work has been or is scheduled to be conducted on the project area, and no measures 10 avoid or minimize potential impacts appear warranted. 9 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 According to the Natural Communities and Rare Species of Washington County Map (Minnesota County Biological Sur\'ey, 1990), the project site does not contain rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features, 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Itill the pfl)jccI inioR the phiwical or /iicfro/ogic cI/kTtltion - dredging. filling. st/'caIfr! dirc'rsion, oiit1f/ srr:(ctl(!'(', diktng. and in!/) und,n(?n! ---- of czni s:1r/a'c 1ae'F' such as a lake, pond, utla,i, stream or drainage ditch? LJ )s 0 No Ifier, idcnrzfv aatcr rc,sorn•ce affctec/ and give the DATR P,th/ic !-1'atcrs Inv'nton i?I1i)/c'J'(S) if the fl'atc'I' resoio•cc's aff'crcd are 011 t/,c P117: iV/4. Dc.vcrihe aIr('rnatn''s COJLSidcl'ed and proposed iniligution nieastires to lflini!fli:e illl/)OCIS. The project will not involve the physical or hydrologic alteration of natural surface waters such as lakes, ponds, wetlands, or streams. On September 27, 2012, Arrowhead Fnvironmental Consulting, Inc., (AEC) evaluated the project area for wetlands and other jurisdictional waters. No jurisdictional wetlands or waters were identified within the project boundary. Prior to delineating the site, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Lake Elmo Quad), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory Map (PW]), the Washington County Soil Survey Map, and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map were reviewed, Historical images from 1936, 1953, 1957, 1964, 1991, 2000, 2003, and 2010 were also reviewed. The PW1 map indicated no Public Water Wetlands are mapped on the property. The NWI map indicated several wetland basins within the property (PEMCd, PEMIC', PSSIC, PFO1C, PUBFx) (Exhibit7); a PEMC wetland was also mapped along the western property line; however, field review indicated it is located off of the property. According to the Washington County Soil Survey map, non-hydric soil is mapped throughout the property. AEC' reviewed the entire site and focused on four specific areas. Soil samples were collected in each of these areas and reviewed, but in each case the soils observed at the sample point locations were determined to be non-hydric, and no hydrology indicators were observed. Consequently, none of the areas examined met jurisdictional wetland criteria. The eastern portion of the review area was converted 10 a golf course in the early 2000's. Several "ponds" were created throughout the golf course; most of the ponds have rubber liners. AEC reviewed historical aerial photography to detennine if the ponds were created in historical wetland areas. Based on the aerial analysis, it appears that none of the ponds were created in historical wetland. AEC submits tliat the pond areas should not be regulated as jurisdictional wetland as they were created in upland and have artificial bottoms (rubber liners). AEC reviewed an area in the agricultural field (just west of the golf course near the center of the review area, an area that is quite evident on 2010 aerial imagery. This area was a stockpile of coarse material (mostly sand and gravel) and was dominated by pigweed (Amw'cmthus) species. The area was detennined by AEC not 10 meet jurisdictional wetland criteria. Due 10 the timing of ]ate -season field work, findings have not heen reviewed in the field by wetland regulatory agencies, and therefore have not been confinned in writing by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for the project area, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The TEP and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be invited to review and comment on the wetland delineation in spring 2013. 10 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 13. Water Use 01/1 1/10 J?0/0Ct irn olre i,1t1/I(l1i011 or 11h(1)1110110111 ot'crn-t 1010/' WOIIY, CO/I/!0Ctio?? 10 01' clrungos in 0/?) /)llhfic natoi-supplr or appropriation of anv grouncl nisurface reader (i/ic/?u/ing de??aloring)? ©Yes LJ No. us a1phcub1e. giro locution and puiposo 0/0/tV 1101/ erells: puhl;c supply ciflectc'cl. c/iaigc's to he mcidc. uuc/ Ilater quantities to her used: rht source, /lurarion, quantity and pu/posc of aui appropriations; aril Io1ique ite/1 ,u,iihe,v and L)NR appropriation perinil nuinher , ifknoitn. Ic1entifv aui' existing curd n0 rr 1/01/5 on 11/0 site neap. Ifrherc 000 110 110115 koolIn 011 the site. explain ,iierho/o10 v used 10 derennine, Abandonment of water wells No new water wells are planned for the project. The Minnesota Geological Surveys (MGS) County Well Index (CWI) indicates there is one registered well within the project site. According 10 the Phase 1 Environmental Assessinent report, no municipal or private water wells were rioted on the Property, except for an irrigation well located on the Frandsen Parcel (fonner golf practice range). According to Minnesota Department of Health well records for Unique Well No. 686580, this irrigation well is 300 feet deep and was installed in 2002 10 irrigate the golf course facility (Appendix C). This well will be abandoned during construction. If any other active or inactive wells are discovered 011 the property, they will be field -located, abandoned, and sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health regulations prior to site development. Connection to a public water supply system The City of Lake Elrno currently operates two wells, which are pennitted under DNR Water Appropriations Pennil No. 611031. The two wells range in depth from 285 to 808 feet deep, and draw water from the Jordan -Mt. Simon and Prairie Du Chien -Jordan aquifers(2010 Drinking Water Report). The Cilv's DNR water appropriations permit allows a total system pumping capacity of 260 million gallons per year (MGY). According to DNR Water Appropriation records as of2010, the city reported pumping 103 MGY (average 282,192 gallons per day). The estimated water demand for the proposed development is 34.3 MGY (94,037 gallons per day) based on the assumption that consumption is approximately 110 percent of wastewater generation (see Item 18). Consequently, there are no water supply issues anticipated as a result of adding the development 10 the city's water supply system. According to the city engineer, water may be supplied to the development either through an existing services agreement with the City of Oakdale or via the Lake Elmo municipal water supply system. The current Comprehensive Plan calls for municipal water facilities to be extended from the southeast corner of the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Boulevard to service this portion of the city. Dewatering Dewatering will become necessary i F surficial groundwater is encountered during utility installation: however, it is unlikely that dewatering will be necessary because the depth to groundwater exceeds the planned depth of sanitary sewer, municipal water, and slorrn sewer in most areas within the study area. Based on data gathered from Unique Well No. 686580 upon installation in October 2002, static groundwater levels in the area are approximately 120 feet below trade. The quantity and duration of potential construction dewatering is not known at this time, but it is expected that any necessary dewatering for construction will be temporary. If groundwater is encountered during utility installation, it will be discharged to temporary sediment basins located within the project site. 11 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 If construction dewatering and pumping from the proposed developmenl exceeds the 10,000-gallon per day or 1,000,000 gallons per year thresholds, a DNR Water Appropriation Permit will be obtained. If it becomes apparent that construction dewatering will not exceed 50 million gallons in total and duration of one year from the start ofpumping, the contractor or project proposer will apply to the DNR Division of Waters for coverage under the amended DNR General Permit 97-0005 for temporary water appropriations. It is not anticipated that construction dewatering or pumping from the proposed development will be extensive or continue long enough to impact domestic or municipal wells. 14. Water -Related Land Use Management District Dos ant part att/icploj&?ct i,noIi a shore/and :oning district, u delineated 100-rear flood plait', or a stare ortie,aIft designated wild or scenic ricer fancl use district? 0 Y's �No Ifrcs, idenrif the district and Jisc:is.s project compatihili r with district land uvc rcslr,cr,ons. The project site is not located within a shoreland zoning district. The site is not within 1,000 feel of a Minnesota DNR Public waterbody or 300 feet of Minnesota DNR Public Watercourse, which would trigger a shoreland zoning district. According to FEMA Floodplain mapping (2008 Update), the project is located within Flood Panel 27163C0335E; HUC 7010206. The entire project is identified as being outside of either a 100 or 500-yearfiood zone (Exhibit 7). The site is also not in or adjacent to any stale or federally -designated wild or scenic river land use zone, 15. Water Surface Use tfi/1 IIle /1/010(1 C/ullige the rrrnnhcr 0/ t17?e af i;atercivft 01/ tu/r truter /'ud'? £7 Yes �No Ifis, indicate the current cardprofec:ted //ar1rc,a// usage aid discuss alirj?olentia/ aiereroiiding ur ro with other iISOX. The project site does not encompass any surface waters that are used by watercraft, 16. Erosion and Sedimentation Gil 1/70 acreage ro he ijaded ar e.eaiu1cI and the cubic vards ofsorl to he'noted: Acres: Approximately 100 acres of 11 2.5 acres will be graded for streets, house pads, and storinwater features, Cu/'ic Yai'dx: Approximately 750.000 cubic yards of soil will be moved. Dos eri be 0/11 steep slopes or hrgh/' o/vdlble soils riid ideniifv (bern on the site' map. Dcscribc cu)r (/union crud sedi,ien/atioij control nwasllri's 10 bO used during and afterpra]('cr construction. The Highly Erodible Land (HEL) List for Washington County, Minnesota (USDA NRCS, 2006) indicates there is one potentially highly erodible soil that covers approximately 23.7 acres in two areas within the study area (Exhibit 8). Chetek sandy loam (6-12 percent slopes) is located in the central portion of the western portion and in the southwest corner of the eastern portion of the property. According 10 the USDA NRCS SSURGO database for Washington County (Accessed 2013), steep slopes (1 2 percent or greater) may he associated with the one soil mentioned above. Contour Savona LAW April 3.2013 mapping indicates that the majority of the surface topography is gently undulating. Elevations range from 1,078 feet in the northwestern portion ofthe site to 950 feet in the eastern portion of the site (Exhibit 2). The western portion of the site drains to the southwest, and the eastern portion drains east-northeast. With the majority of the project area being over 1,000 above mean sea level, the site contains some of the highest elevations in the city. Because the project will involve disturbance of more than one acre of land, application for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) General Permit will he submitted to the MPCA prior to initiating earthwork 011 the site. This pennit is required for discharge ofstorrnwater during construction activity and requires that Best Management Practices (BMPs) he used to control erosion, and that all erosion controls be inspected after each rainfall exceeding 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Erosion control practices that will be implemented 011 the site include: 1. Construction of temporary sediment basins in the locations proposed for stonnwaler ponding, and development of these basins for permanent use following construction. 2. Silt fence and other erosion control features installed prior to initiation of earthwork and maintained until viahle turf or ground cover is established on exposed areas. 3. Periodic street cleaning and installation of rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt onto public streets, 4. Stabilization of exposed soils, phased with grading, within 7 days for slopes steeper than 3: 1, 14 days for slopes less than 3:1 but greater that 10:1, and 21 days for slopes flatter than 10:1, 5. Energy dissipation, such as riprap, installed at storm sewer outfalis. 6. Use of cover crops, native seed mixes, sod, and landscaping 10 stabilize exposed surface soils after final grading. Erosion control plans must be reviewed and accepted by the City of Lake Elmo and applicable watersheds prior to project construction. Because the above BMPs will be implemented during and after conslruction, potential adverse effects from constriction -related sediment and erosion on water quality will he minimized. 17. Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff ci) Coinporc thtr quwt/iv and quality ojsite ,1!1IofTc/rc' and afe,' the project. Desc'nbc' p!nnancnt c'ont,uls to inanagc or Irear runoff .Lescrihe am s10n701ate;'pollution /n'e''C)lIiO/I !)/t/IS. The project must meet the requirements of the city's Stonn Water Ordinance. The project also must meet the requirements of the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts (e.g. infiltration, erosion), where applicable. The city's Stone Water Ordinance is available on the city's website. Lake Elmo is also a mandatory small MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) city, and is required by federal and state law 10 ohtain and implement a NPDES Siormwater permit administered by the MPCA. MS4s are also required to develop and implement a stomiwater pollution prevention plan program (SWPPP), and suhmit an annual report to the MPCA. 13 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 Pre -Development Site Runoff Existing site runoff likely contains pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer residues due to the presence of agricultural fields and the golf practice area. There is also likely a minor amount oCrunoff that flows to the site from Keats Avenue North. However, because the site contains some of the highest elevations in the city, runoff primarily drains away from the site to the southwest and east-northeast. 11 is expected that a portion of the runoff infiltrates into the site's permeable, silty and sandy soils (see Item 19) and some likely reaches existing onsite stormwater ponds located on the golf course practice area. Post -Development Site Runoff The change in land use will decrease the amount of agricultural chemicals and suspended solids, and increase other components typical of urban runoff. It is expected that the volume ofrunoff will increase during significant storm events as a result of the increase in impervious surface area. It is anticipated that only extreme conditions such as those occumng in connection with 50- or 1 00-year stone events will result in measurable increases in runoff volume and associated pollutant transport. The preservation and creation of open space in the form of buffers, parks, woodlands, and ponds will help to mitigate potential adverse effects from the increase in impervious surface. Runoff water quality will be typical of residential developments, and will likely be slightly degraded due 10 pollutants deposited on roads, roofs, and other impervious surfaces. Similar to current conditions, sediment, nutrient, and other pollutant removal will occur when much of the stonwater filters through upland vegetation, vegetated drainage swales, stormwater ponds, and other best management practices, including infiltration. Preserved and newly seeded vegetation will provide filter strips to help remove sediment and nutrients before runoff discharges 10 area wetlands and surface waters, mitigating potential effects on water quality. Potential adverse effects ol'runoff volume and quality will be further mitigated by the construction of approximately 5,0 acres ofstonnwater ponds, which will be designed to reduce peak runoff rates and meet all requirements of the City of Lake Elmo, and Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts. The design ofponding areas and the quality of stortnwater discharging from the development will meet the requirements of the MPCA General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity (Minnesota Stormwater Manual, and applicable local regulations. In a storm event, stonuwaler will he retained in the ponds and discharged at or below existing peak runoff rates. BMPs will be employed during construction to reduce erosion and sediment loading of stormwater runoff. Inspection and maintenance of BMPs during construction will be consistent with NPDES/SDS General Permit requirements, including site inspection after rainfall events, perimeter sediment control maintenance, and sediment removal. 1') Ikit:fi' rouses ciiici receiving rioter bodies fur rune fffrom the site: include major dounstrra,n water- bodies as n'ell as tlie in,,nec/iate receiving iiarerv. Esii,nalc-' impact runoff on the quali!i ofreceii'ing nalers. According to available watershed district mapping, the project site is located within the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts (Exhibit 6). Surface waters generally flow east- northeast towards Lake Elmo, and southwest towards an unnamed creek which connects Armstrong Lake to Wilmes Lake. Because the site represents one of the highest locations in the city, the site does not receive directed runoff from off -site waterbodies such as Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake, or Lake Elmo, and there are 110 direct hydrologic connections to these waterbodies from the project site. 14 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 The goal of the project will be to maintain peak discharge rates at or below the existing condition. Post -construction drainage will follow similar pathways, with minor differences in drainage routes and increases in the volume of road ditches and swale flows. Post -development slonnwater runoff will either travel overland, into stonriwater ponds, or through stone sewers prior to discharging to receiving waters. For the following reasons, it is anticipated that site development will have minimal effects on receiving water quality: • Preservation and creation of approximately 27 acres of buffers, parks, woodlands, and ponds (24 percent of the site). • Hydraulic storage within sediment basins will be designed, and BMPs impleinented, in accordance with the General NPI)ES/SDS Pennit for Construction Activities to protect water quality and control erosion. 18. Water Quality: Wastewaters a) Desc;i/,sot,rs, composiriun alul quciutitics of all sanitary, rururicipal and industrial uas!e1vater pivc/ucd nr i1L'(1tCd at tIIL .site. Only normal domestic wastewater production is expected from the project. The types of wastewater produced will be typical of new residential developments. No erisite municipal or industrial wastewater treatment is anticipated or planned. Both the MPCA and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) have compiled and documented extensive data that relates wastewater flow generation to population and land use. Sanitary wastewater production for the proposed development was estimated based on the methods outlined in the Service Availability Charge (SAC) Procedure Mauual (MCES, 2012). The MCES has established 274 gallons per day (gpd) to he the average daily wastewater production from a typical residential connection. One SAC unit is defined as 274 gallons of wastewater flow volume, which is based on the assumption of 2.74 persons per unit and 100 gallons per capita day (gpcd) of wastewater production. Each single family residence and townhome was assigned one SAC unit. The estimated maximum potential daily wastewater production for the entire development is 85,488 gpd. The following table provides information on wastewater production based on land use. Proposed Use Table 18.1 Wastewater Production Predicted \%astewater SAC Rate tJnjs SAC Units_(ga1IonsIday) Single family Homes Townhoines 1/Unit 190 190 52,060 1/Unit 122 122 33,428 Total 312 85,488 15 Savona EA\V April 3. 2013 lij D'scr'ific lias!c 1 tuflflWlt niet/iods or pol/utiou /nci'nh/vn L'//v?fs and givc' fS1i/fl(1ICS cif conlpvvi000 (11'kl Iraljiicitl Idc'nr!t /eceiriilg ii(it&'/'S, including /nq/or £I0lllisll'(OlJ water h()C/ICS (ic/entifi'iig anv impaired uafc'rs), and (vOn?ate the disc/iargc illljYUC1 an the quality of receiving lvaters. ]tt/,e pro/ect inivlies tin -.cite c1I'agC SVS1c'fliS, diSClLS the: uipahi/iti of site ,ditionsfiui suc/i vytc',iis. No on -site sanitary sewage treatment is proposed. c) Jfnast'v iii// bc /ischa,',cd into a puh/ic/i onned ireatmenttaciliri. id('lltifi rhe /(lCiIi1I+ (I('SC17b(' nni Jn'elrea1/7lcn1 pi'nvis'!ons cunl discuss ihe fc,ctilii) s afrililr to handle the ''o/U/flc uiid coinpostlioii ofmastes. uleititiing aryl' In1J7'o inonts nec0scu' According to the city's approved Comprehensive Plan, the project area is situated within a designated sewer service area (see Future Land Use — Sewer Plan, 2012). Current plans call for the proposed development site to be served by municipal sewer extended from the southeast conier of the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Boulevard. All wastewater from the proposed project will he discharged to the Woodbury. Oakdale, Northdale. and East Oakdale (WONE) Interceptor. The amended Land Use Plan (2012) forecasts approximately 515 new households connecting to the WONE Interceptor by 2015, and an additional 1,235 households by 2020. From the WONE Interceptor, wastewater from the development would tlow to the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant in St. Paul, Minnesota for treatment; the largest wastewater treatment facility in Minnesota. This facility currently treats approximately 215 million gallons of wastewater each day. and has the capacity to treat up to 250 million gallons per day. The Metropolitan Council projects ample capacity at this plant through 2030. Consequently, no wastewater facility or treatment capacity issues are anticipated (MCES 2007). 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions .4pprovnaie dc;tIi (in /i'0) to groundwater: 0 ,n[niniiin: —150 average Approximate depth (in feet) 10 hacl,'oc'k: '-50 inini,nwn —125 arerugc a) Descriho anv o/rhe /ol/oiii,ig geologic site /,:ordv to growid iicifer and also idenriti' then, on the site Inap: sinkholes, s/iallon limestone forniaoons o, karst conditions. Describe measures 10 avoid or n,ini,niz' cJ17r0)znle,lta/ prohIens due to anr of these lia:ards. Groundwater elevations within the vicinity of the site are around 875 feet above sea level based on The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5, Plate 5. Topographic mapping indicates that elevations on the site range from approximately 1,070 above mean sea level in the northwest corner of the site to 980 above mean sea level towards the eastern border of the site. Consequently, the maximum depth to groundwater is estimated at about 195 feet. Because surficial groundwater is sometimes encountered in seasonally wet areas, the minimum depth to groundwater is estimated at 0 feet. The approximate average depth to groundwater was calculated by averaging the topographic elevations on the site (1,025) and subtracting the anticipated depth shown on the Washington County Atlas (875). Depth to bedrock was estimated from the record of Unique Well No. 686580 (County Well Index. 2012) (Appendix C). The well and boring record completed for this new well in October 2002 indicates that Prairie Du Chien hedrock was reached at a depth of 152 feet below grade. The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5. Plate 4 indicates that the distance to hedrock ranges between approximately 50 and 200 feet below grade. 16 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 h) Dcscri['' the soils VJI site, giriiig 1VRCS (SCS) class gro!uuitluz(.'r unluniinar,untro,n c,Stev or che,uic l&C((flJS to /?!'Cie/it such C'onlafliflalio/L s. 1/ knoIOL D1SCHSS soil Itxtii;'e U1ldfOt(21/tiUIfOr acf or s7rillt>cl (fllt() the soils. Discuss un flhitiUti(J/! The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5, Plate 1 indicates there are no known sinkholes, exposed bedrock, springs, or seeps on or near the site. if such features are encountered on the site, actions will be taken 10 mitigate potential effects such as stormwater routing, soil stabilization, and groundwater protection practices. Soil Classification The Soil Survey Geographic (SSIJRGO) digital database for Washington County (USDA NRCS. Accessed 2013) indicates the soils that occur within the project area (Exhibit 8) are classiEied as summarized in Table 19.1 Soils on the site are predominantly non-hydric silty and sandy Joams. Table 19.1. Soils Classification Mali Syinhol Soil ('Iassitieation Hvdrk' 264 Freeon silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes Not hydric Prime Iarmland2 I53B Santiago silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Not hydric 153C Santiago silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric 1 55C Chetek sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes Not hydric 155D Chetek sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes Not hydric 342B Kingsley sandy loam, 2 10 6 percent slopes Not hydric 49B Antigo silt loam. 2 to 6 percent slopes Not hydric All areas are Prime Farmland All areas are Prime Fannland Fannland of Statewide importance Not Listed Not Listed All areas are Prime Farmland A11 areas are Prime Farmland Based on the NRCS List of Hydric Soils of Minnesota (1995). 2 Based 011 the USDA/NRCS Prime Fannland of Washington County, Minnesota (2002). A geotechnical subsurface investigation has been initiated. Results of the investigation will be published separately. Potential for Groundwater Contamination The Geologic At/as (?f lJTas/unglon Couniv, 11'Jjnnesota (1990) pollution sensitivity snap indicates that the sensitivity of groundwater to pollution in the proiect areas is generally moderate. Sensitivity of groundwater systems to pollution is defined as the approximate time it takes from the moment a contaminant infiltrates the land surface until it reaches an aquifer. Although shallow groundwater is 17 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 highly susceptible to contamination, moderately permeable soils with finer textures will slow or restrict the movement of water, which extends the time needed for chemicals to break down before reaching the water table. As stated in item 19, the average depth to groundwater on the site is estimated at approximately 150 feet helow ground surface, providing a significant buffer between the soil surface and the groundwater aquifer. Because development will be typical of residential uses, no unusual wastes or chemicals are anticipated to be spread or spilled that would cause significant groundwater contamination. The proposed project may offer continued groundwater protection by providing adequate stormwater treatment and vegetated infiltration areas such as rain gardens. and buffers to help capture runoff and filter pollutants. The project will adhere to the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts infiltration requirements for stormwater. Because of the site's elevated position in the overall landscape, the propensity for runoff to drain away from rather than towards the site, and the absence of surface water connections to known PFC-contaminated waterbodies (i.e. Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake. and Lake Elmo), the potential for infiltrating contaminated surface waters on the site is low. Special Well and Boring Construction Area According to the Minnesota Department of Health, 2012, a special well and boring construction area 15 a mechanism which provides for controls on the drilling or alteration of public and private water supply welis, and monitoring wells in an area where groundwater contamination has, or may, result in risks to the public health. The purpose of Special Well and Boring Construction Area is to inforni the public of potential health risks in areas of groundwater contamination, provide for the construction of safe water supplies, and prevent the spread of contamination due to the improper drilling of wells or borings' Contractors proposing to drill a well or boring in an advisory area must first contact the Minnesota Department of Health, Well Management Section to deterniine proper procedures for installation. As previously discuss, Perfluorochernical (PFC)-groundwater contamination exists near the project area. While the project is located in a Spccial Well and Boring Construction Area, installation of new groundwater wells is not planned by the project. Groundwater Protection and Mitigation Measures The Savona residential development will offer a higher level of groundwater protection than exists under current cojiditions. Chemical applications can be high in agriculturally -dominated landscapes. The conversion of the site to urban uses will ensure greater protection of groundwater by: (1) covering exposed soils with turf and landscape plants to reduce infiltration ofnutrienis and pesticides; (2) reducing hazardous materials on the property to include only household quantities (3) providing 27 acres of park, woodland, and open space; (4) providing stormwater treatment systems (5) abandoning an existing irrigation well; and (6) not drilling any new wells for the project. 18 Savona EA\V April 3, 2013 likely be used in typical quantities during site preparation and unit construction. Builders and contractors arc responsible for proper management and disposal of wastes generated during consl-ructioii, which is typically handled by using construction dumpsiers and the appropriate certified landfills. No known hazardous materials are currently located onsite, Use of toxic or hazardous materials, outside of vehicle fuels, standard household cleaners, and lawn care chemicals, is not anticipated within the project area in conjunction with the proposed residential development. c) lnjicatc the niimhor, location, flVlZ( and UVt.' of ar{r aboie or bi'loo groans! tanks to .store p Ii'oloiwi products or other ,nat.rials, excJt iia1.'r, Descr[he erns 'jnc, encv r sponsc conrai,011L'nr plans. As described in item 9, a Phasc 1 Environmental Site Assessment was conducted by Liesch Associates, Inc. in October 2012. No underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks were observed on the property, or reported 10 Liesch. 11 is currently not anticipated that above or below ground tanks for storage of petroleum or other materials will be located on the project site. however, if above or below ground tanks are proposed on the site, they will be installed according to MPCA regulations, and consideration will he given to spill and leak detection and prevention technologies, as well as double -walled tank construction. 21. Traffic Parking spaces added: 0 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion): 0 Estimated total average daily traffic generated: 2,518 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of 253 trips occunence: (Peak hour approximately 4:30 to 5:30 PM) Indicate source of (rip generation rates used in the estimates. Trip Generation, 9th Edition !Tthc pcuk hour rrafiic generate cveeecls 250 rchic/es or tlo' total daily trips exceeds 2.500, a traffic impact stiith must hepr'pw'ed us purl ott/w EA FI'. Using the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Traffic Impact Study Guidance (ai'aflaHe at; or a similar local guidance, provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the projecl's impact on the regional transportation system. A traffic study was completed for the proposed project in April 2013. The traffic study examined the potential traffic -related impacts of the proposed project on the adjacent roadway system and key intersections near the site. A copy of the traffic study is included in Appendix E, and summarized below, Trip Generation The trip generation for the proposed project was determined based 00 the standard trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation, 9th Edition (lnstitute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). The trip generation estimates for the proposed project are shown in Table 21.1. 20 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 Existing Conditions An operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the foliowing key intersections in order 10 determine how traffic conditions currently operate in the study area: • Keats Avenuc (CSAH 19) at ]�th Street (CSAH 10) • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 1-94 West Ramps • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 1-94 East Ramps • liiwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at Hudson Boulevard The Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) intersections with the 1-94 West and East Ramps are signalized, as well as the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard, The Keats Avenue intersection with 1 oth Street (CSAH 1 0) is all -way stop controlled, and the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard is side -street stop controlled. The existing conditions analysis revealed that all five (5) of the key intersections currently operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) C or better during the a.in. and p.m. peak hour with existing geometries and traffic control. Future Conditions 11 is anticipated that the proposed project will be fully built -out by the year 2018. Therefore, an operations analysis was also completed for the year 2018 in order 10 determine the traffic -related impacts of the proposed development on the adjacent roadway system. Two future year development scenarios were analyzed: year 2018 no-huild, and year 2018 build. The year 2018 no - build conditions assume that the proposed project is not built; however, background traffic growth in the study area is assumed to grow at a 1.7 percent annual growth rale. The year 2018 no -build conditions is used as a future year base from which the year 2018 build traffic volumes were developcd. The year 2018 build conditions assume that the proposed project is fully build -out. in addition 10 the five (5) key intersections analyzed as part of the existing conditions analysis, the proposed east -west roadway (5th Street) intersection with Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) was also analyzed as part of the year 2018 build conditions operations analysis. The year 2018 no -build conditions analysis revealed that all of the five (5) key intersections continue 10 operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing geometries and traffic control. The analysis results for the year 2018 build -out conditions revealed that even with the addition of the traffic generated by the proposed development, the five (5) key study intersections as well as the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the proposed 5th Street will operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak liours, with existing geonietncs and traffic control. Conclusions While the proposed development will increase traffic volumes on adjacent roadways, the increase will not have an adverse impact on traffic operations since the adjacent roadways have enough reserve capacity to accommodate the site -related iraffic. Therefore, with the exception of the proposed east -west collector roadway (5th Street) that will serve as the primary access to the proposed development, no additional improvements are needed 10 the existing roadway system 10 accommodate the proposed project. Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Dust The construction process is expected 10 generate some dust, but it is 1101 anticipated that fugitive dust will be generated in objectionable quantities. Consideration will be given to suppression of airborne dust by application of water if significant fugitive dust generation occurs during site grading and equipment operation. In general, incidental dust emissions generated during site construction will he consistent with City Code Section 96.03, 4(a). 25. Nearby Resources ,'l!'L' 0/)1 ot1/1eI_)II0l!'iflg /'(cn(ces on or in proxiniiri to the mite? Jfvcs, (/eN(/7h t/h. /c'SO//t'CO 0/1(1 id'/lTIfV (/1)1' pvecr-i'dcited fnipac!.v on the resource. Describe- onv nu.asurcs 10 1)!iflfflhiC 0/' auoid ucli'crse impacts. .4/'chacolog!ca/, 11,SIO77CUl or (11'Chtic'ct!(/'al 1'CSO!l!'Ct!S? Li Ye, i0'N The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) conducted a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structure Inventory for the project area (Appendix 1)). Based on their review, no previously -recorded archaeological sites or historic structures were identified in the database for the project area. Consequently, 110 further review of archaeological, historical or architectural resources is considered warranted at this time. PI'!1!JC or 1(/)iq)le/W'/fllancfs 0!' land 11i(/!i11 (1/! ag/!c!/lturalprese?1e? ©Yes ©No According to the NauraI Resources Conservation Service (MRCS), four of the eight soil types found on the site are classified as prime farmland (Table 19.1). These soils comprise 73.0 acres or approximately 65 percent of the site area. Prime farmlands consist of land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, and oilseed crops. According to the NRCS, prime farmlands have an adequate and dependahle water supply from precipitation, a favorable temperature and growing season, acceptable acidity or alkalinity, acceptable salt and sodium content and few or no rocks." This does not mean all soils listed as prime farmland produce exceptionally high crop yields. No farmland preservation measures have been considered. Because the site is guided for development. 110 clear alternatives to conversion of prime farmland are readily identifiable. Dc'vi'iaiedjxi,*s, c'c!t'a1ion areas or lrai/s? E7 )'.'s 1?1No There are currently no designated parks, recreation areas, or trails within the project boundaries. Lake Ehno Regional Park Reserve is located less than a mile uorth ot'the proposed project site. Stonegate Park, located approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the project area, contains a playground and athletic fields. Scenic 1!1?11'S (1/1(1 vistas? LJ )'as 10iV', There are no scenic views or vistas located on or near the properly. Oho/' !11)i(jlle !'LS0!17C0S? ©Yes �ATo 24 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 would intersect with Keats Avenue North 10 the east for proper site access and traffic control. This collector road will eventually be extended west as those properties develop as guided. lmpacls related to public improvements directly associated with the proposed development project are discussed throughout this document. 29. Cumulative Impacts !Ii;,eo1a Rule /?cu'I 4410.1 700, suhj?w1 7, item 13 requires that ihe 1ZGT, consider the culflu/ulirC puten(iu/ efli'cls of ,e/ated u,' Llnlkipall'/filflu'e pro/ecl.c'' iihen dciernun(ng ihc neat! for art enrirunnlen/u/ ilupatl slafionenL k/entifv anv puss. present or 1'(, ss000bll/oreseealile/uturL j,,'u'ct. that ,00V interact uitli the pl'oJecl c:/e,',bed in tits E,i !-J' in vudi a wav as to cause ctinuIarnepo1i'n0al effects. (Such future protects iotI/ b' those Mat are acn,allr planned or for ii'hicli a basis ofexpectcn1oi has been laid.) Describe the nature of the cu;,,:ilatiic' polentiul effects and s,t,n,narize au.r other arailahle inforinction releiant 10 determining whether there is potential for significant environmental efficts dire 10 these clul ulatri'e effects (01' clLc'uss arch cumulative norential efTa'ci under aopropnate (1iJlfls) elsewhere an this /?rin). The changes in regional land use in the Lake Elmo area from open space and agricultural land to more urbanized uses is expected to have a cumulative impact on the area. Cumulative effects of this and future projects on natural resources and infrastructure are expected 10 be roughly proportional 10 the impacts discussed in this EAW, er somewhat greater if future projects are developed at a higher density. The City of Lake Elmo has planned for future growth and development in this particular area as part of its Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2012), utility plans, stormwater management plans, and administration of zoning ordinances. These efforts will ensure that the cumulative impacts of future growth and development to the environment. and to the city's service capacity, are anticipated and mitigated. The project proposer does not currently own or have options on adjacent lands. Consequently, the precise timing and nature of future development in the project vicinity is unknown. However, land adjacent 10 the project site is eventually expected to develop, per the city's Land Use Plan, thereby converting existing open space and agricultural lands to residential and conunercial uses. The City of Lake Elmo's Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2012) anticipates and guides the intensity of development within the city and directs necessary infrastructure improvements to support the planned development. Parcels to the south, west, and northeast ot'the proposed project area are currently undeveloped and zoned HD-A-SRD er HD-RR-SRD. in keeping with the city's Comprehensive Pian, and the MOU with the Metropolitan Council, these parcels are expected 10 develop in the future to rnediurndensity residential and/er commercial uses. Undeveloped parcels immediately surrounding the proposed development site contain similar land uses and land features as the project site. Existing land cover on these properties is primarily agricultural, with grasslands, wooded tree lines, and small wetlands interspersed. The proposed proiect will not result in conversion of jurisdictional wetland to upland, but will result in minor tree removal and conversion of agricultural lands 10 non-agricultural uses. Consequently, cumulative impacts to natural resources are anticipated to be minimal, and have been purposefully concentrated in this portion of the city 10 preserve an agricultural core to the north of lOtll Street (CSAH 10). 36 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 Item Title Table 31.1. Sumniary of Issues and Mitigation Measures 16 Erosion and Sedimentation 17 Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff 21 Traffic RGU CERTIFICATION Mitigation Measures Minimize the potential for erosion by BMP implementation; compliance with the city's Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and NPDES/SDS General Permit requirements; preparation of SWPP plan. Creation ofstorrnwater ponds and BMP's to manage stormwater runoff and adhere to the city's Storm Water Ordinance and watershed rules. Detailed traffic recommendations are provided within the conclusions portion of Section 21 ofthis document. T/ic' Envi,v,unenta/ Oualiry Board ni/I onlr accept SIGNET? E,n'iro;,inentn! 4ss!ssmcnt fI'oi'kthets for imhlic rtaticr in the EOB Monitor. 1 hereby certify that: The information contained in this document is accuiale and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are 110 other projects, stages or components other than those described in this document, which are related 10 the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules. parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60. respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title: Kvk Klau. Planniniz Director. Citv of Lake Elmo Environmental Assessment Vorksheet was prepared by tlie staff ofthe Environmental Quality Board at the Minnesota Department of Administration. Ot'tice of Geographic and Demographic Analysis. For additional information, worksheets or for E.4WGwidelines. contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651 -201-2492, or http:!/www.eqb.state.rnn.us Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank l4,p 14 rsm'flt P7201111415'EAL4O'El'o 0515 0R&,olAnool 412013 33115014 2013 WpSIWO d 07o1es4 004 Sery - Inc - 3414 5 01c5107 Wnnlv od 1 5 70. nn 00773, 0,14 t20a2t. 1401400014100147 B-nrn' Acrnssed 20121 lA'twood Profeslon.t 5rvk, Inc 7610 4naqra.n 0r,nn 0440 Pr4Ir7e, MN 07144 4140775 053-3375704 755 042-1157.5422 '0707.7415. 1 008.007 1100 wwww1woodptcon, - r Legend Feet 2,000 EAW Project Boundary 5- 7, 3 3 7. V 71 Lake Elmo, Minnesota USGS Topography EXHIBIT 2 tfap Do n' t;P.'2t1E2tifitt,>[S;EA'M.Ta.;EUn„EAW_AWO?A and 4'IPOU ;'f :it PAt 2Q13 ;Vestwood P,nkssFonat Scrv,r•,s gricultural Field Agricultural Field Commerci ng[e-F ami ly Re&denUal Agrcu Agricultural Field ` SRes dFarniiIy ;fir r enII =-v= . Single -Family =- E- g�- ,.�f-.>--�x� ---_--•�--•- Residential" Family enlial Sou,cetst: vtestwood Prafessianst SercEces S-ur�ey taat«« r2Qt2k. tJSGS ORG tESr Bttscn:np, Accrt5. d 2412t We,twood Prof ,Iona) service. Inc 76vs Anngrwn o,we Ellen Prairie, MN 5511e PHtS{�E 052.'J37.5954} FAx 952-997.5822 TOCliREE l.H80-4S7-51W www.rmUwodRs,mm �..... I Feet 0 1,©©© Gravel E 1racoon Legend Gravel`"" Extract on = r t f ,. Commercial EAW Project Boundary Agncultural Field Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Adjacent Land Use EXHIBIT 4 Mop 13 ,,n -/2 6/2012/16' rIS/2AWnk, 2 ,ozon 976/A 08 4 1 2418 34128 0/) 28/2 WOS/Wond P,21888062 Ser, es. Inc 63 08 as JULEP Ay 6- 68' 62 Cottage Grove Ravine Portion South Washington Watershed District Boundary 0 23 lS7a31 ;73 �55 4986S1 iB553647 , Legend -I 1 EAW Project Boundary p ,' es/wond 6 /enqonI Services 1101084 bo,a 232 C',v W caee 2 ro 260184 838p (Acc,zse2 2012} Valley BrancN Watershed District Boundary 1, c S150 213 '12 -J 08 6,3 5) Wtwood Ps,/on SM6e, /98. /8896880/20,,, Done Eden /M8lr/MN 09344 PHONE 052-838.5188 688 992 831 8822 008136082- 1-888.817-8950 www,westwoodptcoln i Legrd 4O 288109 8,810810 088818/ /2,18188,8 8,882-In 2-6,1086 Pnwez1138-0 8-8443,8 Lake.2 88 13, 1 96 8 1- 88 28016221818 8-119 8613 656 0 0 0 86135' 810 18139 81 1313 31608 /813 2-031313 188' 88 134,,�L4/3 .,rg,J 5) 0 0• 0 0 IIJJ:10 i07 Feet 800 Savona EAW 48,288188,, 8011,844 8401l284n4,5411t11, _/1 Lake Elmo, Minnesota Zoning Map EXHIBIT 6 1334 2ncunr-n1 0.t20t21 s61/GISrEAWL.s6a0lma So/0lA.nxd 4r1 2013 2 c'O:O.S 09/ 2013 01341v/164 Pra'essrmr' 4Fa So,xce!st Westwood 0r4E04ss99e+ Sea SUPRGO 0b35 ar0,885nir510n Counts t2004r 'e/ csa:a / RG i050i Westwood Professional SeMcrx, in<. 7099 nnnstrnm Omre Eden P1141 /0. MN 65344 05109E e02.9315150 4X 992-037-0422 309179£E 4-080.937-5150 www.westwoodpoc©m 0. Arre01E0 20121 i.._.. 1 Feet 0 400 Legend FAW Pro}ect Boundary Hydric Soil Unit Non-Hydrir, Snil Unil Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Soils Mapping EXHIBIT 8 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally b!ank Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is inteniionally blank Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page iuintentionally blank Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West St. Paul, MN 55102 651-259-3453 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Dean Sather <Dean.Sather(westwoodps.com> wrote: Mr. Cinadr, 1 am requesting a Cultural Resource Database search for the following property located in Washington County: Township 29 North Range21 West Section 34 Please let me know if you have any questions er concerns regarding this request. Thank you, Dean T. Sather, MA, RPA Archaeologist ! Principal lavestigator Licensure MN #1 -OO7 Westwood Professional Services Sen'ing clients across the Nation D[RECT 952-906-7488 2 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blaiik Traffic Impact Study to be inserted when finalized. April 9,2013 Page 2 he extended to connect to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). However, the completion ofthis future connection will be dependent on the development ofthe adjacent properties. The proposed Savona development will generate an estimated 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 197 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound trips), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). A comparison ofthe proposed development with the assurned land uses in the City ol'Lake Elrno's transportation plan revealed that the proposed Savona residential development appears to be consistent with the land use assumptions included in the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. Future Year 2018 No -Build Conditions: The year 2018 no -build analysis revealed that all intersections are expected to continue 10 operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the peak hours under the year 2018 no -build conditions with existing geometrics and signal timing. Not surprisingly, the review ofthe vehicular queues revealed the same minor queuing issues reported during the existing conditions on the southbound approach of lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard during the p.m. peak hour will continue under the year 2018 no -build. Under year 2018 no -build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound lhrough movement will back up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 6 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour (versus 2 percent under existing conditions). However, once again the existing lagging left -turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts ofthis occasional blockage ofthe southbound turn lanes. The increase in the background traffic from the existing conditions and the year 2018 no -build conditions result in another potential queuing issue in the future during the p.m. peak hour. The review ofthe vehicular queues also revealed that vehicles in the heavy eastbound to southbound movement from 1-94 to CSAH 19 spill -out beyond the long eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood ofthe vehicular queues ofthis heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right -turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turnithrough lane during the p.m. peak hour, Future Year 20)8 Full Build -out Conditions: The analysis results for year 2018 full build -out conditions indicate that all ofthe key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. Similar to the no -build conditions, a review of the year 2018 fiull build -out conditions vehicular queues revealed that the same minor queuing issues reported on the southbound approach of lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard; and the eastbound approach ofthe 1-94 South Ramps at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection during the p.m. peak hour. Under year 2018 build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through movement at the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) April 9.2013 Page 3 inlersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up past the existing IeI- and right-tuin lanes approxirnateiy 8 percent ofthe pm peak how (versus 6 percent under no-huild conditions) and the eastbound right -turning vehicies from 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 will continuc to spill -out beyond ihe existing eastbound dual right-tuiri lane approximately 1 percent ofthe pn1. peak hour. Thc existing !agging !eft-twn signal phase at the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intei'sectioii with Hudson Boulevard will continue to help minimize ihe negative operalional inipacts ofthis occasional hiockage ofthe southbound turn lanes. The existing traffic signal tirning at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Rainps should be monitorcd and niay need to be adjusted in the friture in order to minirnize the likelihood ofthe vehicular queues ofthis heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right -turn lanes and blocking access to ihe eastbound shared left-turnithrough lane during the p.in. peak houi. This potential signal timing adjustment would be needed with or without the proposed Savona developrnent. Secondary Acccss to !nwood Ai'en,,e (SAH 13) or Hudsoii Boulevard: The proposed Savona residential development will construct a portion of 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western limits oftheir site. As the remaining available land north of 1-94 between Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13 develops, a secondary access may be rteeded to either inwood Avenue (CSAH 1 3) to the wesi or Hudson Boulevard to the south. in order to relieve pressure on the proposed Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 51h Street. Based on ihe results ofthe traffic operations analysis, the intersection ofKeats Aveiiue (CSAH 19) and 5th Street can acconirnodate 100 percent (or the full build -out) ofthe uliimate 796 dwelling units assumed hy the City's cornprehensive plan to be directly served by the proposed east -west collector (5th Siieet) before a secondary access is needed to relieve prcssure on the intersection, Conclusions/Reco,n,neudations: The existing roadway system and traffic control will be able to accomrnodate the proposed Savona residential developrnent, assurning the construction ofthe proposed 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western lirnits ofthe pl'oject to provide aceess in/out ofthe site. Apri19, 2013 Page 4 Existing Conditions The proposed development is locaied in the northwest quadranl ofthe Keats Avenue (CSAI-1 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elino, Minnesota (see Figure 1: Project Location). Keats Avenue (CSAH 19), in the vicinity ofthe proposed developrnent. is a divided four -lane roadway with an existing speed Iiniit of 55 rnph north ofHudson Boulevard and 50 mph south of Hudson Boulevard. E-ludson Boulevard is a iwo-lane undivided roadway, and serves as north &ontage road to 1-94. The existing speed lirnit along Hudson Boulevard is 50 mph. lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13), to the west ofthe proposed developnient, is a divided four -lane roadway with an existing speed limit of 45 rnph norili in the vicinity ofHudson Boulevard, An operations analysis was conducted lhr the am. and p.m. peak hours at the foliowing key inleisections in order to deterrnine how traffic conditions currently operates in the study area: • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at loth Street (CSAH 10) • Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) at Hudson Bouievard • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at North 1-94 Ramps • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at South 1-94 Ramps • Enwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at Hudson Boulevard All key intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTrafflc software. The existing signal tirning (provided by the Washington County) was used in the analysis. Existing peak hour lurning movement counls were collected by Westwood Professional Services in Mareli 2013 at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) interscctions with l�th Street (CSAH 10), 1-Iudson Boulevard, and the North 1-94 Ramps. Washington Courity staffprovided year 2010 counts at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps and the Jnwood Aveiue (CSAH 13) intersection with 1-ludson Boulevard. Since there have been no rnajor changes in this area and relatively stagnant economic conditions since the year 2010 traffic counts were taken hy the County, the year 2010 traffic volurnes were deemed to be a reasonable reflection ofexisting conditions at these two intersections Cuncnt geornetrics and peak hour traffic volumes at the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Copies of the raw turning movement count data at each ofthe key intersections are provided in Appendix A. Using the roadway geometric and traffic volurne data described above as input. traffic operational analysis was performed per the standards set out in the 2010 Highwav Capacity Manual. published by the Transportation Research Board, Synchro/SimTraUfic 7 was usecl to coinplete the analysis. 54j 49 197 LEGEND XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Signalized Intersection All -Way Stop Control Intersection Side -Street Stop Control Intersection tom - se map source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporotron, 2013 Westwood P'&ess,onat 7555 Ana*3rrm DrPse Eden Pro;:sr. Mt S534 t '5 Qt1E %2-531-3 15o ?A% 552.73; 5B72 r9LL F5Et ? 5B5 53l 5150 ..s n..t olwrnhps cm Existing Conditions Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 #20121161 Figure 2 April 9. 2013 Page 8 approximately 2 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour. However, the existing lagging Leff -turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of thus occasional blockage ofthe southbound turn lanes. The LOS results for the year 2018 full build -out conditions are provided in Appendix B. Proposed Development and Site Access The proposed Savona residential development is located in the northwest quadrant ofthe Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Based on the conceptual site plan dated April 1, 2013 (shown in Figure 3), the proposed development will consist of 190 single-family and 122 multi -family lots. 11 is anticipated that proposed development will be fully built -out by the year 2018. As shown in Figure 3, the conceptual site plan indicates that access to the proposed development will be via a new east -west minor collector located hetween loth Street (CSAH 10) and Hudson Boulevard, This new east -west collector roadway (hereafter referred to as 5th Street) was initially identified in the City of Lake EIrnos Year 2030 C(mlprcllensiie Trciiisportalion Plan. As part of this project, 5th Street will be constructed as a two-lane divided roadway with turn lanes provided at major intersections, from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western edge ofthe proposed Savona residential development (or approximately 3/4-mile west of Keats Avenue), Ultimately, 5th Street will be extended to connect to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). However, the completion of this future connection will be dependent on the development of the adjacent properties. Figure 4 illustrates the future minor collector roadway identified in the City of Lake Elmo's Year 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the portion ofthe roadway (5th Street) that will be constructed as part ofthe proposed Savona development. Comparison of Proposed Development to Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan In order to determine if the proposed development is consistent with the land use assumptions included in the City of Lake Etmo's Comprehensive Transportation Plan. a land use comparison was completed. The proposed development is located within the transportation analysis zone (TAZ) 1229C. As shown in Table 2, TAZ 1229C is anticipated to have 796 households by the year 2030, according to the Lake Elmo 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Table 2 Assumed Development with TAZ 1229C Year 2030 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Transportation Plan Lake Elmo TAZ 1229C 2 796 Households 2000 2030 Source: Ehc Citv of Lake Elino 2030 Co,n1n1 e,s,o T/ulsjwfr71rion P/a,i. Principal Arterial A Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Ptr:tradv ot Rty Source: City of Loke Elmo's, 2030 Comprehensive Tronsportotion Pion A1eW,,00d PotinJ In, 799 gry Drive de,, iri 55144 lQlt 9237S1SQ rnx S937s$22 IOLL IEE vwwwo,twoodoxom oodbu Approximate limits of 5th Street to be constructed as part of the proposed Savona Development 17 Future Minor Collector Roadway Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN ¶ April 9, 2013 2O121151 Figure 4 April 9, 2013 Page 11 The Savona residential development is proposing 3 12 new househo!ds 10 TAZ 1 229C. This represents Iess lhan 40 perccnt ofthe assumed number ofhouseholds in TAZ by the year 2030. This rneans that more than 60 percent ofthe assurned 796 households is stil! available for the rernaining land in TAZ 1 229C that is guided for residential land uses. Figure 4 shows the proposed land uses in and around TAZ 1229C. As sFown in Figure 5, the proposed developrnent accounts for more than halfofthc land area within TAZ 1229C thai is guided residentiai. Thei'efore, the proposed Savona residential devclopment appears to be corisistent with the land use assumptions included in tlie Lake Elnio Comprehensive Plan. Traffic Forecasts Sinee the ftull huild-out ofthe proposed developrnent is assumed by the ycar 2018, future tra0ic volurnes were developed for the year 2018. Year 2030 average daily traftic volumes on area roadways (based on the City ofLake Elrno and Washington County Transportaiion Plans) will also be presentcd for inforrnaiional purposes, Ycar 2018 — No -Build Traffic Volumes The year 201 8 no-huild scenario assumes that thc Savona site does not develop. Existing tratTic volurnes were increased at a rate of 1.7 percent per year in order to account for background iraffic growth in ihe area. This growth rate was based on the current traflic volume projection factors for Washington County published hy MnDOT, Year 2018 — Full Build -Out Traffic Volumes The year 20 1 8 fiull build-oui. scenario assunies that the proposed Savona residential development is fiully buili-out. Future year 2018 full huild-out volumes were dcveloped by adding the development -related traffic from the Savona development to the Year 201 8 no -build traflic volumes. Vear 2030 — Traffic Volumes Washington County staffrequested that forecast year 2030 traffic voluines on area roadways (hased on City/County cornprehensive p]ans) be included in the traffic study for inforniational purposes. Forecast year 2030 volumes were taken from the City ofLake E1rnos Year 2030 Coiiiprehensire Transportation Pfan and Washington County's 2030 Coniprehcnsii'e: A Polic) Giiide lo 2030 — Transporiaiion, April 9, 2013 Page 13 Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the a.rn, and p.m. peak periods and on a daily basis were calculated for the proposed Savona residential development. The trip generation estimates were developed based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation ltlamicii, 9th Edition. The trip generation estimates for the proposed development are shown in Table 3. Table Trip Generation Estimate: Savona Residential Development ttI Average AM Peak Hour f PM Pout Size Weekday In Out 1 Total In Out Tota Single -Family Residential 190 DUs 1,810 - 36 107 143 120 70 190 Multi -Family Residential 122 DUs j 708 9 45 54 1 51 48 99 Net New Trips 2,518 , 45 152 197 162 91 253 'The trip generation estimates were haled un the 2012 ITE Trip Geiiraiioi, A!unuul. 9th Edition, As shown in Table 3, the proposed Savona residential development would generate approximately 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 197 trips during the a.rn, peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound trips), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). The trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the adjacent roadway system using the directional distribution shown in Figure 6. The directional distribution shown in Figure 6 was based on existing population, traffic patterns, and adjacent roadways system. The resultant year 2018 no -build and traffic volumes are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. The forecast year 2030 traffic volumes on area roadways (based on the City of Lake Elmo and Washington County Transportation Plans) are shown in Figure 9. © & 35 60 Lc © F 155°55' 4Jj,4r 60 ,215) 30 —► Hud��11/►son Blvd 15 110a, Q• Hudson Blvd (20 5 100 10 175) 15 LEGEND XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Signalized Intersection All -Way Stop Control Intersection - Side -Street Stop Control Intersection se mop source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporotiop, 2013 4/etl'+rood walestional Ser�¢es, Inc. 7599 anagram Drive Eden Prairin. MN 55144 ^IIONI 952-95(-5150 rAx 952-931-5922 7OL1 ift LE 1 91d 937 S15n com 10 ',5) 50 20 135,40 Year 2018 No -Build Conditions Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 ti20121161 Figure 7 LEGEND XX - Lake Elmo Transportation Plan 2030 Volumes (XX)- Washington County Transportation Plan 2030 Volumes p source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporotion, 2013 W{Stwood P'oiCsi'On& 5orv,Ces, Inc. toes inasram bivre Ednr n,ni!ip. MtF 55i44 QfioNC 9s2.931-43so c45 952937-5B72 LOLL 6RSE - I3 937 5150 Year 2030 Traffic Volumes On Area Roadway System Savona ©evelopmentTrafficstudy lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 U20121161 Figure 9 April 9, 2013 Page 19 approach 10 the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection will extend approximately 590 feet back from the intersection. Tliis is primarily due to the high number of'existing (1,220) and liiture year 2018 (1,330) eastbound right -turning vehicles li'om 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 during the p.rn. peak hour. However, since the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane currently has 540 feet of storage provided, the vehicular queues will only spill -out beyond the eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent of the p.m. peak hour. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need 10 be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southhound movement fiom spilling beyond the existing dual right - turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turn/through lane during the p.m. peak hour. The LOS results for the year 2018 no -build conditions are provided in Appendix C. Year 2018 Full Build -Out Conditions A year 2018 full build -out analysis was conducted in order 10 determine how the existing roadway system can accommodate the proposed development -related traffic volurnes, it should be noted that the year 2018 full build -out scenario assumes the existing roadway system and intersection traffic control at the key study intersections with the exception of the new intersection of Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) with 5th Street. For the purposes of the year 2018 fuli build -out analysis, the following lane configuration and traffic control assumptions where included at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) intersection with 51h Street: Assumptions for the Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9)/5th Street Intersection: • Northbound Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) Approach: o Free -flow o Three (3) approach lanes (consisting of 1 — left -turn lane & 2 — through lanes) • Southbound Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) Approach: o Free -flow o Three (3) approach lanes (consisting of 2 — through lanes & 1 — right -turn lane) Eastbound sth Street Approach: o Stop -Controlled o Two (2) approach lanes (consisting of 1 — left -turn lane & 1 — right -turn lane) The results of the year 2018 full build -out analysis are shown in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, all intersections are expected 10 continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the peak hours under the year 2018 full build -out conditions with the existing geometries and signal timing, and the proposed 5th Street. Apri19, 2013 Page 20 Table 5 Year 2018 Full Build -Out Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Kcats Avenue (CSAH 19) at l�ih Street (CSAH 10) Kcats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 5th Street Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) at 1-94 North Rarnps - Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at - 1-94 South Rarnps lnwood Avenue (CSA,H 13) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Ave. — Free Flow 5th Street — Stop Keats Ave. — Free Flow Hudson Blvd. — Stop Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Traffic Signal lntersection Control Level of Service (1) A.M. Peak All-WayStop A/B A/A A / B c c B P.M. Peak A/B A/A A/C c c c For lt,I1a1I?'Ld u1tLrut1on thL kucr reportLd rcprLsLm thc LOS tor th. cfltlrc iiuct scctoa I -or unl2I1a1I7cd IntcrLL,tIon the flrsi lelter rcporlcd is thc LOS ofthc cntire incrsection. while thc sccond lctcr (in italies) is thc LOS oflhc tvorst opra11g appruach. Sirnilar 10 the no -build conditions, a review ofthe year 201 8 full build -out conditions vehicular queues reveaied that the same minor queuing issues reported on the souihbound approaeh of Jnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard. and the eastbound approach ofthe 1-94 Souih Ramps at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection dui'ing the p.rn. peak hour. Under year 2018 no -build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through moverneni at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up pasi the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 8 percent ofthe pm. peak hour (versus 6 percent under no -build conditions): and the eastbound right -turning vehicles froin 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 will continue to spill -out heyond the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour. As previously rnentioned. the existing lagging lcfi-turn signal phase at the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard helps to minimize the negative operational impacts ofthis occasional biockage of thc southbound turn lanes, The existing traffic signal tirning at the Keats Avenue (CSAI-1 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should continue 10 be monitored and adjusted as needed in order 10 minimize the likelihood ofthc vehicular queues ofthis heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual righl-turn lanes and biocking aceess to thc eastbound shared lefi-turnithrough lane during the p.rn. peak hour. The LOS resulis for the year 2018 tiill build -out conditions are provided in Appendix D. April 9,2013 Page2i Secondary Access to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) or Hudson Boulevard As rneritioned previously, the proposed Savona residential development will construct a portion of5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western lirnits oftheir site. As the remaining available land north of 1-94 between Keats Avenue (CSAF-1 19) and lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13 develops, a secondary access may be needed to either lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) to the west or Hudson Boulevard to tlie south, in order to relieve pressure on ihe proposed Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 51h Street. Consisteiit with tlie City's transportatiori plan, the lnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) connection wili ultirnately he cornpleted as the rernainiilg land to the west develops. Therefore, this additional analysis wili focus on identifying when a secondary access 10 51h Street via Hudson Boulevard may be needed based on the future traffic operations at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) intersection with 5th Street. The foliowing methodology was utilized to estimate when a secondary access to 5th Street via Hudson Boulevard may be needed hased 011 the fi.iture traffic operations at ihe Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) inlersection with 5th Street. The forecast year 201 8 full build -out traffic volurnes were used as a base, The traffic volurnes in/out of5th Street were increased in 10 percent incrernents until the traffic operations at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intcrsection with 5th Street falis helow acceptahle LOS D. The resultani inerease in traffic will lhen be documented. and an equivalent build -out percentage ofthe available land within TAA 1229C be identified. Based onthe results ot'ihis iterative analysis, the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 511i Street can accornmodate approximately 200 percent additional tratlic to/fi'om 5th Street than the year 2018 fiull build -out traffic volurnes before lhe traffic operations of the eastbound lell- turn from 5111 Street to northbound Keats Avenue (CSA,H 19) breakdowns during the p.rn. peak hour and delays for this movement become unacceptable. This 200 percent additional traffic during the p.m. peak period corresponds to approximately 500 additional single-family homes build -out ofthe available land in TAZ 1229C'. Since the City ofLake Elrno's transportation plau assurned 796 households in TAZ 1229C by the year 2030, and the proposed Savona developnient accounts for 312 ofthe assumed 796 dwellirig units, a total of 484 households remain in the TAZs aliotment before it exceeds the developrneiit level assunicd in the coniprehensive plan. These 484 dwelling units are approximately equal 10 the equivalent number of additional single- family honles that will generate enough traffic to either trigger the need foi' a secondary access 10 5tli Street, or require improvernents to the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. Therefore, the inlersection ofKeats Avenue (CSAH 19) and 5th Street can accornmodate 100 percent (or the full build -out) ofthe assumed 796 dwelling units in TAZ 1229C before a secondary access is needed to relieve pressure on the intersection. 11 should he noted that this analysis looked exclusively at traffic operations as a trigger for the t'uture need of a potential secondary access to serve the developrnellt along 5tb Street. Other items such as fire. life. and puhlic safety issues will also need 10 be consideied when considering lhe tinling/need t'or a secondary access. April 9. 2013 Page 22 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our review ofthe proposed Savona residential developnierit. we offer the foliowing eonclusions and recomrneridations fhr your consideration: Alt ofthe key intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.ni. and p.nl. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. The proposed Savona residenlial development wUl consist of 190 singie-family and 1 22 wulti-family lots. It is anticipaled that the proposed Savona residential devclopmenl will be fully build -out by the year 2018. The proposed Savona developrnent will generate an estimated 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 1 97 trips during the a.m. peak hour (wiili 45 inbound and 1 52 outbound trips). and 253 trips during the pm. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). Under year 2018 no -build conditions, alt ofthe key intersections wiil continue to operale at an acceptable LOS C �i' better during the a.rn. and pm. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts, Under year 2018 hill build -out conditions. alt ofthe key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C or helter during tlie am. and p.rn. peak hours, with the existing traffic controt and geornetric layouts. A review ofthe vehicular queues revealed sorrie minor queuing issues reported on thc southbound approach oflnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAI-I 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard; and the eastbound approach ofthe 1-94 South Rarnps at the Keats Avenue (CSAI-1 19) intersection during the p.m. peak hour under tlie exisling, year 2018 no -build, and the year 2018 huild conditions. The vehicular queues from the southbound through movement at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH, 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 2 to 8 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour (depending on the analysis year); and the eastbound right -turning vehicles from 1-94 to southhound CSAH 1 9 will continue to spill-oul beyond the existing eastbound dual righi-turn lane approximately 1 percent of the prn. peak hour urider year 2018 no -build and build conditions. The existing lagging lefi-turn signal phase at the lnwood Avenue (CSAE-1 1 3) iiitersection with Hudson Boulevard helps to rninirnize the negative operational irnpacts ofthe occasional biockage ofthe southbound turn 1anes. The existing traflic signal tirning at ihe Keats Avenue (CSAH 1 9) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitoi-ed and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to rninirnize the likelihood ofthe vehicular queues ofthis heavy easibound to southbound inovernent froni spilling beyorid the existing dual right -turn lanes and biocking access 10 the eastbound shared left- turnithrough lane during the prn. peak hour, This potential signal tirning adjustment would be needed with or without the pmposed Savona developrnent. April 9. 2013 Page 23 • Based on the resutts ofthe trafflc operations arialysis, the iritersection ot'Keats Avcnue (CSA,H 19) and 5th Street can accornniodate 100 percent (orihe full build -out) ofthe ultimate 796 dwelling uriits assumed by the Citys comprehensive plan to he directiv served by the pioposed east -west collector (5th Street) beibre a secondary access is needed lo relieve pressure on the intersection. Therefore, the existing roadway system and traffic control will he able 10 accornrnodaie the proposed S avona residentia 1 deve lopment, assu ming the construction of ihe proposed 51h Street fi'orn Keats Avenue (CSAI-1 19)10 the westem lirnits ofthe projecl to provide access in/out ofthe s ite. Attachrnents: Appendices A — D (Traffic Counts and Detailed Operatioiis Arialysis) cc: Kyle Klatt, Lake Elmo Plannirig Director Jack Griffin, Lake Elmo City Engineer Joe Gustafson, Washington County Transportalion Engineer P\2012116 T/S4-09-2013(/(,cv Appendix A Peak Hour Turning Movemeni Volumes f si. .1 ics, 7699 Angram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name 3 Site Code : 00003001 Start Date : 3/27/2013 PageNo :1 GrouDs Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 CSAH 19 l0th Street N, CSAH 19 10th Street N. Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left Thru Ri9h Peds - Left Thru Riqhi Peds A ro Left Thru Riqht Peds - -,r Left Thru Riqhl Peds Tolal 06:30 0 0 0 0 0 19 27 0 0 46 15 0 8 0 23 0 12 5 0 17 86 0645 0 0 0 0 0 13 36 0 0 49 24 0 2 0 26 0 6 9 0 15 90 Total 0 0 0 0 0 32 63 0 0 95 39 0 10 0 49 0 18 14 0 32 176 0700 0 0 0 0 0 18 39 0 0 57 28 1 5 0 34 1 11 5 0 17 108 0715 0 1 0 0 1 27 63 0 0 90 31 0 11 0 42 0 21 6 0 27 160 0730 0 0 0 0 0 17 55 0 0 72 30 1 20 0 51 1 16 11 0 28 151 07:45 0 0 1 0 1 21 58 1 0 80 33 2 10 0 45 1 21 15 0 37 153 Total 0 1 1 0 2 83 215 1 0 299 122 4 46 0 172 3 69 37 0 109 582 08.00 1 0 1 0 2 19 28 0 0 47 08.15 0 0 1 0 1 17 49 3 0 69 BREAK' Total 1 0 2 0 3 36 77 3 0 116 * BREAK" 26 0 4 0 30 1 12 17 0 30 109 20 0 9 0 29 1 16 12 0 29 128 46 0 13 0 59 2 28 29 0 59 237 1600 1 0 1 0 2 19 21 0 0 40 24 3 22 0 49 1 36 25 0 62 153 1615 2 2 1 0 5 10 23 1 0 34 24 5 18 0 47 1 43 38 0 82 168 1630 2 1 1 0 4 14 37 0 0 51 31 1 34 0 66 4 53 52 1 110 231 1645 0 4 0 0 4 20 27 0 0 47 26 3 24 1 54 2 60 41 0 103 208 Total 5 7 3 0 15 63 108 1 0 172 105 12 98 1 216 8 192 156 1 357 760 1700 2 3 0 0 5 15 27 0 0 42 15 5 24 0 44 1 68 41 0 110 201 1715 2 4 0 1 7 18 28 1 0 47 24 5 27 0 56 2 58 49 0 109 219 17:30 2 2 2 0 6 12 33 1 0 46 22 4 35 0 61 1 61 35 0 97 210 1745 2 2 4 0 8 11 19 1 0 31 29 1 14 0 44 3 56 27 0 86 169 Total 8 11 6 1 26 56 107 3 0 166 90 15 100 0 205 7 243 152 0 402 799 CrandTotal 14 19 12 1 46 270 570 8 0 848 402 31 267 1 701 20 550 388 1 959 2554 Apprch 0/ 304 41.3 26.1 2.2 31.8 67.2 0.9 0 57.3 4,4 38.1 0 1 2 1 57.4 405 0 1 Totat % 0.5 0.7 05 0 1.8 10.6 22.3 0.3 0 33.2 15.7 1.2 105 0 27.4 08 21.5 152 0 375 Unshifted 14 19 12 1 46 270 570 8 0 848 402 31 267 1 701 20 550 388 1 959 2554 %Unshifted 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CSAH 19 Southbound Thr Rig Ped Start Time Left Left u ht s Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire niersection Begins at 16:33 1630 2 1 1645 0 4 17'OO 2 3 1715 2 4 Total Volume 6 12 % Ane Total 30 60 PHF 750 750 1 0 4 14 0 0 4 20 0 0 5 15 0 1 7 18 1 1 20 67 5 5 35.8 .250 .250 .714 .838 z «'3 0. f*ssi. al ices, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 10th StreetN Westbound Thr Rig j Ped u ht s 37 0 0 27 0 0 27 0 0 28 1 0 119 1 0 636 0.5 0 804 250 000 51 31 47 26 42 15 47 24 187 96 43.6 917 l .774 CSAH 19 Northbound Thr Right j Peds •o u 3 5 5 14 6.4 .700 CSAH 19 Out In Total 24 2& 11 12 6 019h1 Thru Left Peds 4 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 1630 Unshrftect Bank 1 4 t -+ Left Thru Right Ped .961 14 1091 1 262 220 482 Out In Total 34 24 24 27 109 49,5 .801 0 0 0 0.5 .250 Left 66 4 54 2 44 1 56 2 220 9 21 833 563 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No :3 00003001 3/27/2013 :3 10th Street N. Eastbound Thr Right Peds Apo u 53 60 68 58 239 55.3 .879 0 0 0 52 41 41 49 183 42.4 .880 0 0 0 0.2 250 110 103 110 109 432 flt Tolal 231 208 201 219 859 982 930 est fessi. .1 ices, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Groirns Prnted- Urshifted - Bank 1 File Name : 1 Site Code 00001001 Start Date 3121/2013 PageNo :1 Keas Ave, N. N. Frontage Rd. Keats Ave, N. N. Frontage Rd. Southbound Westbeund Northbound Eastbound Start Tirne Left r Thru Right Peds Left Thru Rght Peds Left Thn.j Rght Peds Ap Left Thru Rpght Peds T 0630 0 16 3 0 19 24 2 0 0 26 19 20 3 0 42 0 0 2 0 2 89 0645 0 23 2 0 25 21 7 1 0 29 28 26 4 0 58 0 0 2 0 2 114 Total 0 39 5 0 44 45 9 1 0 55 47 46 7 0 100 0 0 4 0 4 203 07:00 0 30 1 0 31 28 19 0 0 47 23 46 3 0 72 0 2 3 0 5 155 07:15 0 26 2 0 28 39 8 2 1 50 29 30 3 0 62 1 0 2 0 3 143 07:30 0 33 6 0 39 31 7 1 0 39 44 54 3 0 101 0 2 4 0 6 185 0745 2 45 7 0 54 25 13 2 0 40 40 40 6 0 86 0 1 2 0 3 183 Total 2 134 16 0 152 123 47 5 1 176 136 170 15 0 321 1 5 11 0 17 666 0800 2 22 3 0 27 28 7 1 0 36 36 25 3 0 64 0 0 4 0 4 131 0815 0 40 4 0 44 26 11 0 0 37 28 38 4 0 70 1 0 2 0 3 154 '"BREAK Total 2 62 7 0 71 54 18 1 0 73 64 63 7 0 134 1 0 6 0 7 285 BREAK 16:00 1 42 2 0 45 12 9 0 0 21 19 59 10 0 88 5 11 28 0 44 198 1615 2 48 2 0 52 10 1 0 0 11 13 55 6 0 74 4 17 31 0 52 189 16:30 0 43 1 0 44 10 6 0 0 16 14 55 1 0 70 7 13 44 0 64 194 16:45 3 65 4 0 72 13 2 0 0 15 13 57 9 0 79 3 17 44 0 64 230 Total 6 198 9 0 213 45 18 0 0 63 59 226 26 0 311 19 58 147 0 224 811 1700 1 50 1 0 52 10 2 2 0 14 17 42 9 0 68 7 22 48 0 77 211 17:15 5 80 0 0 85 5 6 1 0 14 16 54 10 0 80 4 20 43 0 67 246 1730 2 57 1 0 60 10 4 0 0 14 19 55 6 0 80 1 31 27 0 59 213 17:45 2 70 1 0 73 11 8 0 0 19 15 58 10 0 83 3 12 29 0 44 219 Total 10 257 3 0 270 36 22 3 0 61 67 209 35 0 311 15 85 147 0 247 889 GrandTolal 20 690 40 0 750 303 114 10 1 428 373 714 90 0 1177 36 148 315 0 499 2854 Apprch % 2.7 92 5.3 0 70,8 26.6 2.3 02 31.7 607 7.6 0 7.2 297 63,1 0 Total % 0.7 24 2 1 4 0 263 106 4 04 0 15 13.1 25 3.2 0 41 2 1 3 5.2 11 0 17.5 Unshifted 20 690 40 0 750 303 114 10 1 428 373 714 90 0 1177 36 148 315 0 499 2854 %Unshitted 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fessi. .1 ic»s, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name 1 Site Code : 00001001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No :3 Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. Keats Ave, N. N. Frontage Rd. Southbourid Westbound Northbound Eastbourid Start Time Left Thr Rig Ped Thr Rig Ped Left Thr Right Peds < Left Thr Right Peds Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17 45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45 1645 3 65 4 0 72 13 2 0 0 15 13 57 9 0 79 3 17 44 0 64 230 17,00 1 50 1 0 52 10 2 2 0 14 17 42 9 0 68 7 22 48 0 77 211 1715 5 80 0 0 85 5 8 1 0 14 16 54 10 0 80 4 20 43 0 67 246 17,30 2 57 1 0 60 10 4 0 0 14 19 55 6 0 80 1 31 27 0 59 213 Total Volume 11 252 6 0 269 38 16 3 0 57 65 208 34 0 307 15 90 162 0 267 900 % App. Total 4.1 937 2.2 0 66.7 28.1 53 0 21.2 67.8 111 0 5.6 33.7 60.7 0 PHF 550 .788 .375 .000 791 .731 .500 375 000 950 .855 .912 .850 .000 .959 .536 726 .844 000 867 915 0 0 0 Keats Ave N Out In Total 226 289 495 6 _2521 11 0 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 1645 Unshrfted Bank 1 Lefl Thai Rihl Peds 65 2081 34f ol 452 1 307 i 759 Out In Total (s Ave J Ilt TUtI fssi. .1 ices, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name 2 Site Code 00002001 Start Date 3/21/2013 PageNo :1 Grouos Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 Keats Ave. N, 1-94 WB Off -Ramp Keas Ave. N. 1-94 WB On -Ramp Southbound Westbound Northbound Estbound Start Time Lefl Thru Righ Peds Left Thru Righl Pecls Left Thru F4ght Peds ToL Left Thru Rght Peds p1 rti 0610 0 8 33 0 41 20 0 10 0 30 244 31 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 346 06:45 0 16 32 0 48 38 0 20 0 58 225 41 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 372 Total 0 24 65 0 89 58 0 30 0 88 469 72 0 0 541 0 0 0 0 0 718 0700 0 11 48 0 59 27 0 19 0 46 284 45 0 0 329 0 0 0 0 0 434 0715 0 19 50 0 69 35 0 22 0 57 305 44 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 475 07:30 0 25 41 0 66 44 0 32 0 76 284 68 0 0 352 0 0 0 0 0 494 07 45 0 37 37 0 74 42 0 34 0 76 277 59 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 0 486 Total 0 92 176 0 268 148 0 107 0 255 1150 216 0 0 1366 0 0 0 0 0 1889 08.00 0 19 37 0 56 50 1 25 1 77 288 38 0 0 326 0 0 0 0 0 459 0815 0 31 38 0 69 31 0 17 0 48 243 52 0 0 295 0 0 0 0 0 412 " BREAK **P Total 0 50 75 0 125 81 1 42 1 125 531 90 0 0 621 0 0 0 0 0 871 BREAK" 16.00 0 55 16 0 71 43 1 3 0 47 148 87 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 353 16:15 0 76 20 0 96 69 0 5 0 74 125 69 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 364 16:30 0 77 21 0 98 73 1 12 0 86 158 60 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 402 1645 0 99 17 0 116 74 0 3 0 77 131 75 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 399 Total 0 307 74 0 381 259 2 23 0 284 562 291 0 0 853 0 0 0 0 0 1518 1700 0 91 23 0 114 74 0 5 1 80 168 61 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 423 1715 0 114 12 0 126 75 1 4 0 80 179 74 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 459 1730 0 77 12 0 89 46 0 8 0 54 163 78 1 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 385 1745 0 90 20 0 110 58 1 8 0 67 174 71 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 422 Total 0 372 67 0 439 253 2 25 1 281 684 284 1 0 969 0 0 0 0 0 1689 GraridTotal 0 845 457 0 1302 799 5 227 2 1033 3396 953 1 0 4350 0 0 0 0 0 6685 Apprch % 0 64.9 35.1 0 77.3 0,5 22 0.2 78.1 21.9 0 0 0 0 0 0 Totat% 0 126 68 0 195 12 01 3.4 0 155 508 14.3 0 0 65.1 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 845 457 0 1302 799 5 227 2 1033 3396 953 1 0 4350 0 0 0 0 0 6685 %Unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 %Bankl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Keats Ave, N. Southbound Start Time Left Thr Rig Ped Left Ui ht si Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Enlire Intersection Begins at 17:0) 17:00 0 91 23 0 114 74 17:15 0 114 12 0 17:30 0 77 12 0 17:45 0 90 20 0 Total Volume 0 372 67 0 % App, Total 0 84,7 15.3 0 PHF 000 .816 .728 .000 0, 5 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 -94 WB Off -Ramp Westbound Thr Rig Ped ul hti s e ces, File Name : 2 Site Code : 00002001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No :3 Keats Ave, N. 1-94 WB On -Ramp Northbound Eastbound Thr Right Peds FPS m Left Thr Right Peds Ap )u n) Total 0 5 1 80 168 61 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 423 126 75 1 4 0 80 179 74 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 459 89 46 0 8 0 54 163 78 1 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 385 110 58 1 8 0 67 174 71 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 422 439 253 2 25 1 281 684 284 1 0 969 0 0 0 0 0 1689 90 0.7 8.9 0.4 70.6 29.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 .871 .843 .500 .781 .250 .878 .955 .910 .250 .000 .958 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .920 Keats Ave, N. 0uL In Total ._)p.9J L 4)9J L 74j 67, 372 0 OJ Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins 01 1700 Unslnfted Bank 1 Lett Thru Rktht Peds 684 284 11 0 625 969 J 0u1 In Total 14 - 01 -4 + - 0 0) 0 Appendix B Traftic Operations Aiialysis Surnmary — Existing Conditions Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Existing 2013 AM Peak INode Intersection Eastbound Westbound 1 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) ILanes - ' - -- VoIurn 13 28 101 57 Phasing Prot Perm Prot Simlraffic Delay 59.3 43.4 5.2 SmTrafflc LOS D A Storage / *link Dist. 215 *1451 1,451l SimTraffic 95th Queue 38 54 56 (Queue Block Time (%) Northbound Southbound Overall 1' - -- 1` 1' - E 'M' - 144 30 176 561 182 20 402 55 Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 52.0 39.2 9.9 30.0 5.1 2,5 63.2 15.9 8.5 0 D A C A A B A 9 250 *1258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1381 200 53 154 29 110 85 23 57 145 39 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Existing 2013 PM Peak Node IIntersection 1l4th St & Inwood Ave #1 Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Deay SimTraffic 105 Storage/'Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Biock Time (%) Eastbound 1 Westbound Signalized -- Cycle Length: 140) -3 FF 601,85 359 197 Prot Perm Prot 57.3 57.8 23.3 65.9 60.9 c 1 215 '1,451 '1,451 250 1,258 103 125 258 141 92 Northbound Southbound T -3 -- 49 54 125 Perm 14.3 6 250 46 Prot 44,9 0 200 109 1"1' - - 1'1' -3 778 110 36 751 39 Perm Prot Perm 9.3 4.3 82,4 19.0 8,4 A A I 8 A '574 300 200 '1,381 200 135 25 108 252 69 2 Overall Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/8/2013 Appendix C Traffic Operations AI1aI)'sis Surnrnary — Year 201 8 No -Build Coridit IOIiS Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (AM Peak); No -Build Node 1 Intersection 4th St & Inwood Ave #1 Lanes Volume Phasing 5imfraffic Delay SmTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist, SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) J Eastbound 1 Westbound (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) - 1' - (-- 1 FF 13 28 101 57 144 30 176 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot 61.0 46.3 5.1 52.5 42.0 13.2 29.6 D A D D 8 C 215 *1451 1,451 250 *1258 250 200 45 52 57 59 176 34 110 Northbound Southbound 1'1' - - 1'1' - 561 182 20 402 55 Perm Prot Perm 5.8 3.3 50.7 17.2 A 4 D B *574 300 200 *1,381 103 23 51 160 Overall 8.8 A 8 200 42 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): No -Build Node (Intersection 1 1 Lanes jvolume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) Eastbound j Westbound 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (signalized -- Cycle Length: 140) - 1' -> -- 1' - 65 93 391 215 53 59 Prot Perm Prot Perm 57.3 54.0 30.4 64.0 56.2 15.1 o c B 215 *1,451 *1,451 250 *1258 250 120 130 350 156 86 47 Northbound Southbound Overall -- 1'1' - - 'M' - 136 848 120 39 819 43 Prot Perm Prot Perm 44.8 11.9 4.8 71.5 24.6 8.7 D B A 1 C A C 200 *574 300 200 *1381 200 118 163 35 120 322 67 6 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Appendix D Traf1c Operations Analysis Surnmary — Year 2018 Build Conditions Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Node 1 Intersection 1 Eastbound 1 Westbound 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SmTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. Simlraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 14 Prot 54.7 D 215 41 1' - 32 110 Perm 49.6 6.0 D A *1,451 *1,451 60 61 Northbound Future Year 2018 (AM Peak): Build 5outhbound lOverall -(- 1' - -- 'M' - - TT - 77 162 36 192 611 203 23 438 60 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 49,8 39.7 10.9 30.2 5.7 2.8 56.8 18.0 8.8 D D B C A A 6 A 250 *1,258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 62 165 35 109 101 23 56 159 41 6 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): Build Node Intersection Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound 4th St & Inwood Ave U13 (Signalized - Cycle Length 140) - -- 1' - 4-E- 1'1' - € 1't - 65 98 391 224 55 61 136 848 136 42 819 43 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 54.2 50.6 28.3 67,5 62.0 16.4 41.7 13.3 5.9 748 25.6 9.2 0 0 C 3 0 6 4 C 4 C 215 *1451 *1,4511 250 1,258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 110 136 3111 165 99 49 112 179 47 100 321 34 8 Southbound IOvera Lanes Volume Phasing SimTrffic Delay 5imTraffic LOS Storage / Link Dist. VmTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/8/2013