Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
City Council Agenda Packet 8-06-13 with plat maps
I-11E CITY C:) LAKE ? Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services Ein a Fiscally Responsible Manner While s- Preserving the City's Open Space Character NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, august 06, 2013 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo 13800 Laverne .avenue North 530 PM Engineering/Council Study Session 6:45 PM Planning Commission Interview - Jill Lundgren AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Pledge of allegiance C. Roll Call D� Order of Business E. Swearing in of Council Member beeves F. approval of agenda Ca Accept Minutes 1e accept July 16, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes H. PlIbiie Comments/Inquiries 1. Speak Your Peace - Council Member Smith Proclamation 2. Lake Elmo Days Proclamation K. Presentations 3. Recognition of Washington County Commissioner Cary Kriesel, bike Polehna, and Wayne Sandberg for help with Storm Damage Le Consent agenda 4. approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll S. approve rescheduling of November 5, 2013 Council Meeting 6. authorization for John Schiltz to Dispense Beer and aline Coolers at Lake Elmo Days Community Event on September 6 and 7, 2013 7, appointment of Brett Emmons to the Library Board B. Appointment of Council Member Nelson to the Economic Development Authority M. Regular Agenda 9. Consider Preliminary Plat-Lennar Homes/Savona; Resolution 2013-64 10. Lake Elmo Ave Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30th St. -Accept Bids and Award Contract; Resolution 2013-59 11. Well 4 Connecting Watermain -Authorize Feasibility Report; Resolution 2013-60 12. Pumphouse No. 4 Improvements and Connecting Watermain -Authorize Plans and Specifications. Award Engineering Contract; Resolution 2013-61 13. Inwood Trunk Watermain & Booster Station - 2014 CIP Scope of Improvements.Authorize Feasibility Report; Resolution 2013-62 14. Presentation of Financing Plan for G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A; Approval of the issuance of the G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A; Resolution 2013-63 15. Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension - Discussion and Consideration of Project Alternatives 1-6. Consider Planning Commission Appointment 17. Consider Hiring Representation from a Lobbying Firm for the $2.6M state bonding request N. Summary Reports and Announcements ® Mayor w Council • City Administrator ® City Attorney ® Planning Director s City Engineer • Finance Director • City Clerk 0. Executive Session 18. Adjourn to Closed Session per MN State Statute 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) Attorney- Client Privilege regarding 3M litigation P. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Pearson, Council Members Bloyer,Nelson,and Smith. Also Present: City Administrator ZuIeger, City Attorney Snyder, Planning Director Klatt, City Engineer Griffin, Finance Director Bendel,and City Clerk Bell. PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE APPROYAL OF AGENDA Council Member Smith requested that Item H be moved to August 61h. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO POSTPONE ITEM H TO THE AUGUST 6TH MEETING, Council Member Nelson seconded the motion, MOTION PASSED 4-0. In the spirit of Speak Your Peace, Mayor Pearson apologized for taking a shot at previous councils. He said he regrets it. Speak Your Peace is about taking responsibility,so he wants to do that. Mayor Pearson pulled Items 7 and 10 from the Consent Agenda for discussion, City Administrator Zuleger asked that a discussion with the City Attorney Snyder regarding the detachment appeal be added to executive session, MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE THE JULY 16, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED, Council Member Nelson seconded the motion, MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 1:ACCEPT MINUTES THE JUL Y 02, 2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY CONSENSUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Library Board President Steve DeLapp introduced the new Lake Elmo Library Director Linda Orsted. Ms. Orsted is originally from International Falls, MN and has a Masters in Library Science. She previously was the director of library near Pittsburgh, PA, and was in Marinette,WI before that. Ms. Orsted said she is excited to join the City and looks forward to helping the library be a part of the community. SPEAK YOUR PEACE: Tabled to 8/6. PRESENTATIONS None CONSENT AGENDA Page 1 of 7 LAKE ELM® CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 2. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll in the amount of$499,391.22. 3. Accept Financial Report dated June 30, 2013 4. Accept Building Permit Report dated June 30, 2013 5. Approve Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements -Change Order No. 2. 6. Approve Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements- Pay Request No. 2. 7. Approve MnDOT- MmRtent�ncme Agreement (Die. 04109) T-14 9 Pedestr-jan Gr-essim& 8. Approve Encroachment Agreement- 12521 Marquess Way 9. Approve Encroachment Agreement- 11619 5811,Street North 10, AppFave Master-ESC-Feky Agreement for-Munidipal Review SeFv.',-. MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTIONPASSED 4-0. ITEM 7.APPROVE MND T MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO.04109 -TH 5 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING:RES.2013-54 City Engineer Griffin gave a summary of the project. Stated there will be a public open house on 8/21/2013. The project will include installing a crosswalk with a raised median. The City will be responsible for maintenance.This measure is expected to have a calming effect on the road. Mayor Pearson thanked staff and MnDOT for the hard work in getting this done. Council Member Nelson asked about cost savings if the flashing signal was included at this time. City Administrator Zuleger said that he has asked the Lake Elmo Elementary School PTA about cost sharing, but has not heard back yet. Council Member Smith asked about refuge for crossing guards. Mr. Griffin said that it is still a work in progress. Mr.Zuleger thanked MnDOT as well. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE ITEM 7 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA, RESOLUTION NO. 2013-54, APPROVING MNDOT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO. 04109. Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 10:APPROVE MASTER ESCROW AGREEMENT City Administrator Zuleger explained the purpose and intent for the agreement. Going forward developers will deposit funds when submitting a development application.This will protect the City and staff for resources expended while reviewing applications. Council Member Nelson thanked staff for bringing forward. He stated that this is risk protection for the tax payer as well. MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE ITEM 10 THE MASTER ESCROW ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: THE 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELMO MASTER ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMPLETE WITH EXHIBITS AND SUBJECT TO THE 2013 FEE SCHEDULE WHERE APPLICABLE. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 11: ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER PARK AND DECLARING A VACANCY., RE.,2013- 5 Page 2 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 City Clerk Bell provided the background and legal process defined by the Minnesota Statutes for accepting a resignation and declaring a vacancy. Council had no questions. Council Member Bloyer stated he was saddened to see Council Member Park go. MOTION:Mayor Pearson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO,2013-55,A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND DECLARING A VACANCY Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 12:APPOINTMENT TO FILL COUNCIL MEMBER VACANCY:RES.2013-56 City Clerk Bell summarized the background and explained the legal process defined by the Minnesota Statutes for city councils to fill vacancies. Council Member Bloyer noted that aside from a few specific issues, he and the candidates were generally in agreement. He stated that many of his preconceptions were eliminated during the conversations with the candidates. Council Member Smith noted her disappointment with not having more time to discuss. Council Member Nelson stated that all 4 candidates are qualified and that it is a tough decision. Mr. Bloyer read one of the questions that were asked to all the candidates during the interview. He Mr. Reeves responded with a tangible answer. Mr. Reeves wants to lead and had stated some of the achievements that we would like to accomplish during his tenure. Ms. Smith expressed her desire for more privacy in order to have more candid discuss. She stated she likes Ms. Fliflet for her ability to disagree with policy questions. Ms Smith also believes that Ms. Fliflet has the ability to "agree to disagree." In addition, Ms. Fliflet has the benefit of history and her experience. Mr. Bloyer took issue with the assertion of Ms. Fliflet's ability to agree to disagree. City Attorney Snyder suggested that the Council discuss what is lilted or disliked about the responses and not the individual merits of each candidate. Mr. Nelson lilted the representative republic question and stated that Mike Reeves offered the best answer in his opinion. Mr.Nelson also believed Mr. Reeves was collaborative and practical. Mayor Pearson stated that he likes Mr. Reeves.The Mayor also said he appreciates Ms. Fliflet's work and contributions in the past, but does not place as much value on history. He believes it can also be a negative at times. He thinks Mr. Reeves brings something beneficial to council, and the Council would do well to have Mike Reeves on. Ms. Smith reiterated Fliflet's experience. She noted that she wants to have a unanimous vote, but thinks that Ms. Fliflet would have been better choice. She likes Mike Reeves, but would prefer Julie Fliflet. Mayor Pearson stated that he does not believe a unanimous vote is needed. Not everyone can get over it,but he believes Mr. Reeves will. Mr. Pearson urged Ms. Smith to vote the way she wishes. Page 3 of 7 LADE ELM® CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPOINT MIKE REEVES TO THE COUNCIL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM PREVIOUSLY HELD BY COUNCIL MEMBER NICOLE PARK, AND HIS APPOINTMENT SHALL EXPIRE ON JANUARY 5, 2015. Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 3-1 (SMITH NAY). Council Member Smith explained that she voted no because she would have chosen ex-Planning Commissioner Fliflet for her experience and knowledge. ITEM 13:SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS-APPROVE REPORT AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND APPROVE PLANS&SPECIFICATIONS,.RES. 2013-57,RES 2013-58 City Engineer Griffin gave an overview of the Section 34 project. The project includes 16 parcels owned by 9 property owners.Current proposals shown to staff are by Amaris, Savona (Lennar),and Hammes Estates (Ryland). Grading has been an issue due to timing and coordination. As a result, sewer will mostly hug the 194 corridor.The City will be extending sewer and water to this area. The sewering will consist of a gravity sewer and forcemain. The forcemain costs are only being shared by a portion of the Lennar development. The gravity sewer costs will be shared by all. Mr. Griffin explained the sewer improvement costs. Total is $1,706,000. Parcel 1.b withdrew from the service area. The possibility of that parcel later coming back on board was discussed. Parcel la theoretical costs were capped. It was explained that it was not receiving benefit. Mr. Griffin explained the water improvement costs. Total is $1,706,000. Grand total for both sewer and water is $2,378,200, Sewer and water are enterprise funds and are self operating with 100% assessed to developments. Mr. Griffin explained that easements are still needed. So far the owners have offered no cost agreements. It was also explained that the waivers should be obtained now. Council Member Smith asked about the 1,092 REC units in Section 34 when the entire south of 101h street is only planned for 3,200. Planning Director Klatt explained that the number also includes commercial. 1,300 commercial REC units are included in the total 3,200. City Administrator Zuleger said that most of the MOU relief will come in residential RECs due to market conditions. Ms. Smith is concerned that the south of 10th density could get too high. She stated she does not want 5,000- 6,000 housing units in along 194. It was explained that the current proposal is actually lower than the MOU with only about 2.75 RECS per acre.The MOU is 3.2 RECs per acre. Council Member Nelson asked for the commercial versus residential REC numbers for the area. Staff said that it would be provided to him. Council Member Bloyer asked if the REC units ever did get higher, would it be a comp plan amendment. Mr. Zuleger responded that it would. Mr. Griffin recommended that all the easements be obtained at no cost to city. The assessments would be at a 1S yr at 2%over city bond rate. It was then explained that if the City received 100% waiver rate, a public hearing is not needed. If not 100%waived, a hearing is required. On September 3rd,staff will present bids and council will be asked to award project. Page 4 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES Jiffy 16, 201 Mr. Nelson asked about a possible outlier and how it would work. What exposure would city have financially?City Attorney Snyder stated that Council would have to decide whether to do project or not. Mr. Snyder explained Iegal process. It is both the attorney and engineer's belief that an outlier is unlikely. Recovering those costs at a later date was discussed. Mr. Nelson asked about costs changing and how it is split. Griffin explained that once hearing takes place, the City can decrease the costs but not increase. Mr. Bloyer noted an email from a resident who had concerns about their sewer. Some residents may feel forgotten if left out of these projects. Mr.Bloyer stated that this Council is very cognizant of the issues, and that roads and sewers are being approved and getting built. Mr. Nelson reported that he also received the same email. Mr.Zuleger reiterated that these projects are enterprise funds and will not affect tax rate. MOTION: Council Member- Nelson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2013-57, RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT FOR THE SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2013-58, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS. Council Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Council Member~Bloyer left chambers at 8:30PM. ITEM 14. 2012 FINAL AUDi T REPORT REVIEW Finance Director Bendel explained the background of changing audit firms. Jason Miller, from city auditors Smith,Schafer&Associates,presented the audit report. He thanked Dean,Cathy,and staff. Smith, Schafer & Associates has issued an unqualified opinion. This is the highest opinion. It was explained that the auditors also tested for MN legal compliance. Mr. Miller explained the types of funds the city has.These basically consist of General Funds and Enterprise Funds. Council Member Bloyer returned to chambers at 8.37PM. Mr. Miller explained the City revenues. Property taxes are the main source of revenue. He then explained expenditures.He spoke about the unassigned general fund balance. 2012 is at 88%. 2013 is at 90%. It was explained why it is desirable.The total outstanding bonds and certificates were at $16,905,000 on 12/31/12. Mr. Miller went over the management letters, which included the following conclusions: No difficulties were encountered. No corrected or uncorrected misstatements. No disagreements with management.No management consultation with other accountants(potentially opinion shopping). The Internal Control Management Letter noted the following significant deficiencies: limitations due to city size on duty segregation; reconciliation of investment accounts to general ledger; and utility billing software. Council Member Nelson asked about the utility billing software. City Administrator Zuleger explained that staff does want to have a discussion about converting and costs and timing. Within Page 5 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 the next few years new package is needed. Conversion is the greatest challenge. It is inefficient to have two software programs that do not talk. Most likely, this upgrade will be a 2015 budget request. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO ACCEPT THE 2012 YEAR-END ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTERS. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mayor Pearson called far a point of privilege at 8.54PM. Meeting reconvened at 8.,58PM ITEM 15: COUNCIL RETREAT AGENDA UPDATE City Administrator Zuleger provided an update of the retreat agenda. Modifications were pre and post meeting sessions scheduled for the Council. Mr. Zuleger presented the overview of the final agenda.There was no Council discussion or formal action. ITEM 16: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT-FENCE ORDINANCE;ORD. 08-086 Council Member Nelson asked if an immediate motion was appropriate as Council has already discussed this subject for two months. Council Member Smith noted that the word "wall" should be removed from Section E.2 as it is redundant and this correction was previously noted, MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 08-086, ESTABLISHING NEW FENCING REGULATIONS IN THE LAKE ELMO ZONING CODE. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0 MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO DIRECT STAFF TO REPORT TO COUNCIL THE NUMBER OF FENCES APPLIED FOR AND WHAT TYPE IN ORDER TO HAVE A QUARTERLY ORDINANCE REVIEWPROCESS, Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion.MOTION PASSED 4-0 SUMMARY REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Nelson - reported attending Valley Cartage ribbon cutting. Though it is a great building and business. Council Member Smith-no report, Mayor Pearson - reported attending Valley Cartage ribbon cutting as well; EDA had a great meeting and seems to be a great group; attended library board meeting; at the next council meeting he wants to appoint Brett Emmons to the library board; thanked council applicants. Encouraged applicants to continue pursuing the path of service to Lake Elmo. Council Member Bloyer - reported meeting with residents regarding brush clean up; learned about the weir. City Administrator Zuleger - reported working on master escrow agreement; code enforcement is progressing and also increasing as expected. Hardy property is turned over to the county due to tax forfeiture issues; regarding the lake issue - MNDNR said no EAW needed; Staff continues to meet with developers. Three active projects in the Old Village being proposed; Public Works is still actively cleaning brush. Still planning to have round table to discuss action; Council Member Smith recommended that residents bring brush to Public Works facility at this point. It was noted that Washington County has been very helpful in accommodating the cleanup Page 6 of 7 LAKE ELM® CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 efforts. Council Member Bloyer asked about the City's exit-strategy. Ms. Smith said it should be done now and the remaining brush should be brought to the Public Works facility. City Attorney Snyder-no update. Planning Director Klatt- reported submitted Village Comp Plan to Met Council. Been dealing with MAC on safety zones; reviewing Savona preliminary plat. Planning commission will hold public hearing on the plat on 7/29; reported that the Gateway Corridor Commission needs another alternate.Who will serve was discussed.Council Member Smith volunteered to serve on it. City Engineer Griffin - reported on TH 5 effort. Working to get turn lane put back in. Hilton trail interchange project. Hilton Trail will be closed starting this week and through September. HWY 36 will remain open. Rain gardens were discussed. It was agreed that the program would be looked at and reevaluated. There is an issue of some gardens failing and both the Washington County Conservation District and Valley Branch Watershed District are pushing back on funding. Council Member Nelson asked for an update on the Olson Lake Trail sewer project. Mr. Griffin said that there has not been much progress. The City is still waiting to hear back. There is also a shortage of contractors for the volume of work out there. Finance Director-Bendel - reported working on bonding documentation; budget. 8/13 workshop scheduled; Water bills will be going out soon. Public Works not been able to do the meter reads due to the storm clean up and equipment issues; There will be a couple City Clerk Bell - Notified the council about a pending insurance claim related to an injury at the library. The League of MN Cities will be paying the medial claim, but nothing else. The city has not other liability anticipated. There was a discussion of when to reschedule the November 5, 2013 meeting. It was agreed to reschedule to Wednesday, November 6, 2013. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO CLOSE MEETING AND ENTER EXECUTIVE SESSION PER MINNESOTA STATUTE 13D.05, SUBD. 3(B) ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE REGARDING CITY OF LADE ELMO V. 3M CORPORATION AND THE DETACHMENT APPEAL. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Meeting adjourned to executive session at 9:30 P.M. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Mike Pearson, Mayor Adam R. Bell, City Clerk Page 7 of 7 CITY OF LAKE EL MO LAKE EL MO DAYS PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The City has many volunteers who serve countless hours to make the City of Lake Elmo a better place to live and work, WHEREAS: The City acknowledges their commitment and dedication, WHEREAS: The City wishes to express appreciation for their efforts, WHEREAS: The City also celebrates"Community"by bringing families, friends, and neighbors together to enjoy many festivities, NOW, THEREFORE, I, Mike Pearson, Mayor of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 61h and Saturday, September 7th, 2013, as the second annual Lake Elmo Days to distinguish Lake Elmo from all the other surrounding Cities. ,SIGNED THIS SIXTH DAY OFA UGUST TWO THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN. BY: Mike Pearson Mayor �� ..�U.. � .... .. MAYOR ARID COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 4 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the Amount of$456,662.14 SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of$456,662.14. No specific motion is needed., as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operation. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim# Amount Description ^� mmmm---- ACH $ 10,015.38 Payroll Taxes to IRS &MN Dept of Revenue 7/25/13 T ACH $ 5,420.48 Payroll Retirement to PERA 7/25/13 DD4788—D4811 $ 28,276.81 Payroll Dated(Direct Deposits) 7/25/13 40137 401.35-40136 $ 150.00 Accounts Payable 7/17/13 40138-40144 $ 25,026.73 Accounts Payable 7/30/13 40145-40204 $ 386,572.74 Accounts Payable 8/06/13 2043-2062 $ 1,200.00 Library Card Reimbursement 8/06/13 TOTAL 4.56,662.14 1 STAFF REPORT: City staff has complied and reviewed the attached set of claims. All appears to be in order and consistent with City budgetary and fiscal policies and Council direction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda proposed disbursements in the amount of$456,662.14 Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda or a particular claim from this item and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the August 06, 2013, Disbursements as Presented[and modified]herein." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Accounts Payable Check Registers SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the ConsMtAgenk�: - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates 2 c � w O a: a h a o U 2 4t O 0.+ a cs� a, H M_ a Q Gi N C r 1.� T c�f ® x- �iqr W �+ L � o c N n, c o 6 C 0 0 O pry p O 0 O r 0. r id N O N UM C M N N r C1] •.-4 � ,w O � Tom.. ,�. �.r C n o izz � o n Q1 aGi d o e�i Z^ o F" C G c� z z z z z z z C r� F-+ U n N y 4 w a U w V U U U i� rn cn rn cn U) r a> 0 0 U J U CJ C1 U u U o a a c o o � nE N N N N N N N N N cal O G O O O C O O C7 O O © C O O I N 00 V'1 t^w M M h n O <31 a0" M N 1' M 6� in ,^-� ,(1 V'1 00 M M � ^-• N G _ Ct. C7.a NL N L N S.L, N •• M aM am am 'C1 t) ca :� m N �N N iC y NU U 6J U M N O --+ .O d M M O M Q M O M O M M Q N C`'1 N --j, N tl N R.N fl-N17, Lt. it 0 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 M MN.. N.. N rq O .. ,.. o E N N N N V M M M M M M M NN c -q v rit "r d 1 � � m L� Gig Lta - O d O xN ^ NOS N NONONONO E3 O O 4n E M M M M 'Z h r ;:M Mhov6�i - N NN NoNd enN oi c, CC, vi d � N NN N N _ " O OOJ �JOoO rNc,CDn� Cl-.TA O `� Z) 0. M NC_ — y O S S S S S Cpp S 0 ICI �* S S S S S S b d O Q 0., 'vJ h C O O O O O O CO z z z z z z z O c H a � o r, V N N Q. O O .Si Cr W Mn G � O p O N 74 74. cS cC cn Q v, 4 W. o C4 y M M M M M M M M w w p p C. C> A N N 0 N N NaNO aO O O M M Cm O O O ic> Q C d d a' O 0 S O S S S O C7 C; CQ O O C O ce O a, N 0 O Q 00 �c dam'• C O C � C 0S Vl UO 00 .M.e M.. N N N d oC OCIN m �L'J v� n N O M M C1 Cn C' n G 00 N F" ono aA� •, d a v ca p ar a� 11 ^ o CE 'n o" O M . M m C M C M G O� _M � 0• 0 r M V) — - M on M 0 � M Oc06o 0 = 0 0 ^ O .0 n C O � ."'. `O' O "O d © UoEj V N N Q.N Q.CV Cl.N r— = N O 0�4 C � all U N M v p 3 � o o a P a a. a 0 U o o a N M S C �.. N O N N N N U O yy Mtu N '"S d• YA i y 00 00CA 0 C7 ^� tomM C Oo N ry V) � 5 N M 00 00 OF N c) � c N � IN C In r-C\O t r- a _o „r cn W NN wM M , C3v, o ,noknoWno o � c CD o O A v U Z Z Z z 2 Z z o: w 75 1.0 z o 0.1 M M Fi O N N N N p Cl OCD 0 F C w M M p\ O N N N .-•� Ch M f+l M hi N CV S1. fry N N oP C?© am 'd- NM-, o� eY 00� � 000 000 'el' �, v a: 'O O Q 0 .� coa a7 � � � i N O C y 00 C E r � cp N C w tR o0 O ❑ C .mw _yam p 'C6 L. rn c.G,, ONO �^+ M� 'N ' r p N � c L 00 N .�N O x uac o v � � �a � m c � boa & F. OpOCOO � C `� ry r: fK1 �^ eO1• V 000 N v O O y O O n_F", 00 `\0 C) lr, � O � O O c7 O '1 y 00 en to" `y cc _ (14 rn 00 00 _ tY2 .W d o� C7 � boat CCO0Itr � 1 { a, c c x c o O Cl O v � O v; O O O O C O O O O O C O O O O z z Z z z z z z Z v G r^. v M N Im h GG v w w O N Np c a ro O vi _ x a cc L. !. Lam+ bq W) C - O U i Op a 5 v s W a°ni Y x ' b r rt L. •O C � � N V DO e; N .T ^�. F� i f� d m N > aNt M_ M_ M_ M_ a O O C O O O o O C O O C C O p p O GO O C O a O O O p O O � O C, Cl O h M O p 'c} p ON C, 00 �^ C>, h O O o O O OC G O O+ o 00 octn r+; O N N r r 'N v; O O G �C O u' m vJ O� N N c(; 16 M M M m M v; DA .a L^ aCd y 2 b z GC 'C C. O•In Jfi tn NO 'lCi M C� C1 y N rCj N ^ N U N ��r M M R M C M m y M M ✓J M G �,,, Q M O N C R.° ti •� (% U G C] N yU N U N p} � 4y i < v� n �_ i� t- C� i � � n2 n �^. � J c nc° i r a U ar' O O O O C G O O O o o o o o 0 o G o 0 o p r 0 0 0 0 0 o c p m h `N � � � M M M M f'1 M m M M M .v-. may eZ• � 'J" "'� ai• •ef V e!' 17 C N N N �.. (; ,�,� � r•-, � M � M � � .M.+ ,�•, VNl � � .M.. .M.. �.,� .M. m .�- MM-. ,M,,, V a � N � o CD C.y ^1G � d' `� o+ �ta+ �+` a, d' `a' � a, era. 'c�• o, �- o �' at � o. � a. ef � � � ^ � [ �' U m JOa0Cn0P� C � C r O 1- o � Oi� O � OI o rr ^" �'' "'.. p .- C ^ �^,, '""` a "'. O '-• O '-- O '-- p •-+ U N '-- N O 00 O �t ? p C ..r J � C w �• m o cc m S7 Q O O O :a. O P+ � r r- a 60 Y` 0* 00 d„ w N C7 00� 4 t`l or- 0000Chi . .. d' ai v. d WS "0 00 aV en cd D N 7�C7 F^' 'ly M O N ,n m - �_ t r G ccN d C' MU o a N cM � C o4c� ME- •fl �/} r., o 'n p O C%] <(. 1:13ol CY U � oc> oo y N rq Y U ro © m a tt U G7 3 e�P O U M F9 y �^ M C) G � vo r C N u CY n �} r cam `--' Or c to1113 ^ nrt v'n'f QUO ONO 00 U .No 1.0 UMN ;t C O O O O a O C y O O O ICI C O . O O d C c ' n W v, O v z z z z z z z z ca c 00 to ti 4 K 00 W w W � c C � 4t r- N 'OD u w c° w Q u M M O O O O O C7 C C M M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o ^ Cl o o C> ea h r�i O 0 ^OJ rj O ,n N P3 lfl 'V M v) O ,n 'r? v? r n ca- SO x O C ^J' C `G toGo xr) N N � kn r t- IN `n 'n'Q. en C .� 00 N U Y .. .. .. .. .. 44 V) coo N n Ctn �, cN�n cN a " M- ca � � 05 Cl M r~•- . wDoo � o oQQQ� N N wi (J •O :� N 'c3 O N ':dGO N C/} N U U �✓ fV G r " \tom o � � N < N IGN V � LQ u ^ cN N c v W U C C O W O p O (14 C O CN Na � N L" OC O _O n M cq VM't O N ,M_.' N ,M�' N u � No :7 � o cvN No o r� o � u� r� •i 00 NO m E cc� C O V" Q VI na �O'y N 0 00 N `,�i.'� .� ,C_, -' O C C w.. U w t- .-, ti ?k O O O ^ ^ C O C) p b vi v O O 4 O O Q C O C C O O O � O O O O O O O O O O oO p O O 04) O O O C O O C © G O O O O O O o Q n y O C) O O G O O G O O O0 O G p U z ZK z z z Z Z Z Z Z Z z Z z zi 7 C ou lu ^i. T, :S r r r r r t e r r t i e r r r w 3 y ou `r cf a "; Q` � , � � a. U ❑ N6 b0 O � � o Co oboA o4 0U i y U 3 O C N y Si G .G N �t7 W LL1. W W i} P ca of r L °j cxd > > G $ +� s� o a +N M M M_ M M_ m M M m_ m Cl) M_ m M_ m M M M M _ Cl Co C a O O O O O O P N N N N N G r r pP O O o q O Oo O O �..r P O Cl ©o C c O Cl O C O Q O P CJ O p O O 6 C O 4 CD 0 O O O O v O C O O p O O � w Ix d O N C• O 4n n pp n ... cn� NO oP t- c W, N � v; ' � v'i 00 'ci, .: ® oo Cf" In!^, OM yr, Ol M M. M N ONO C4 N 00 00 M M t- n m NW) eh rn tF v� •ch r N -+ y 00 0C 00 Wn tr' `/ n DO < "I r`! 00 N N It tr • V} VJ (n f!1 C!a en ✓1 ca'ic�i a') W N O 00 N O\ N O y ••••• y N y W .� V vs VJ Vj UJ P Cn U: W &n V: coo f C. VJ G v U U? C/ v 0�0 0A 00 on W t*r 0�0 0O bl) OR I b13 w n CUJ r bon IM r bO n 0o CO C ❑ G O C a M_ s., Mc.. M_ �. M •7.a m m � M .� M •r=, M Cr •C M_ .� M �, mti. ems" miw M_ Mi.. ... N O C O O C O O °-�„ o P 0 ^? O O 8 P 0 c W G „�., P "•� O c 00 N N N N rl N CV .�- N - N ,C N ,"^• N .y N .CN N ,C N N N .� N ,C N ,C �, 61 OZ �1 Q 0-0 T a T O` b4 C`T O� 00'J_� W� 0!i p, bA o" b0 d` Oo - C O tly Op m ED.,f�. Oo C N rC N Oj fit rC N �C N N C N N N C r1 TI C` C`7 N N w% r r n rC n `''� i '' i LL) L4 '" n �' i f r O O O C. P Cl O O o v p C b G ClO c a C w C O O q CDO P a O C p c C O C) O C) ClC O ^ M M M rr) M M M M M M P a c o c o 0 o c c o a o c o P c o M M m M MItr M M m M M M M M m M M M M m o O O C O C O O O O O O C7 O O P G7 O 'Itc+ ,;, 0 o C, p c o 0 o q o oP o a O O O C C O O O O cr O y N m a� a� ao 07 00 00 x o0 00 00 oc 00 00 rs. oo W O O Cr. 4 k1 b C O Cl Pr C O 6 O 6 •w.r7. It O .J ;; N m c a a. 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ao 00 00 rn 00 nNt- 000 00C+ 00C. 00ci 00a. 00o 00v aM Oc coo o o0 o ocoPp coocoao0ocPPo o — N P - ^ -- o r- ry r � rt t�. O ^ O C O O C q a o o c o o cs c 4 a O u 0 a 6v c, M � V � � "a J �' •D G � C C cc lu V]t[a v ai O F G7 G yL. a c " tu A. r/a cf w U ri a K2 M +.o ^ ddd q O P N N N N N N d f mot, O O q O O C_ C C> CZ N rlO Ov-, ON � O OvO' Nv v1An nQ OCr p OC N NN ON �� n d'.T. — 00b � N N o0 00 a' .4 r C` © Ce 0 N � .. Gy ,n. O �O M ^ r, anyN � .^�ri � � M z M tn C/} � C! "` 00V) r% t-O (%J N to G ai n Ni r~ CU t` n bU r` h n as C N cn M 4. !'"� 'i. M '�. M 'a.. CG N •C C .p = C d ti N •C_ O N •' A '.A CT 00 O' er ON brf1 O+ 'J� ..4 Q., ou M O GU C+ Oq ..� N .. ` V•, ,�., v_ N O j 'z C o C p pC> _ J O M OM rrn M M O O M O M -� .� h `" c,>,J p •^J ;a It, zz e1' eF W wJ' O IT 'G •:. � a O O 00 a, Oi Cr+ G, G+ Gz Ocl -rnN 0C7M rnra cryM N m •= ^ O ^ O •-- O C �• O •-• O — O N N O f4 C •-• O Q n r~ N n N i c- � O a 3 (� z z z z z 2 z 7 z 7- C a� A r L4 r i i r r r r r r r « y � p y � QN a, pQ m x O 0. 0 C Cw � re ^' C c�VC N y u72 •"' M M M M M M f=1 M M M a p r- r OCr PG Oa O O C arm O C0 G o 0 C N N N C c cd iG co ca itl io Ca 'p to i-+O O' .p M0 00 O UDC •UO GO.J _N U � :l 'G' r C'I 00 r C-.e cd 7 C IF N N �D "� � ^� p p., i^' '� V; a fn y �� ° � '^�� � � �; 0 ^-^ � � � � r'' � `Q .y r; � •�rM U �rM � � ^M„ U "� M � d• o,Po U O Nr U q 1 � o � o " o „ a •w• o � v � •' c " o 0 o p IT N N p a off', o��. a rn� �rpi N N as C C QQ 0.O Z I— '^ p 'O^ cv p� T O tj crN� wCr o oe? o y � .sd $ 00 r OQ w ry G 00 M m \D N N �c N N C 0 4 00C h• d C7 ^�' G0 PO -+ 00 ., G 00 � m 'C� It O C P � O C) O O O G " •l. O w O O O O O � gkgk h J z z z z z z z z z z a x H ai a`i c� Z a, m m a o a L G '- U 7 v > 3 .c ❑ C. C. C. G. fi. GL C• rJ r�r N IliPJ N 'U CJ d ce � L U U p, G. C. C4 G. R in G. � v1 M M ,ry ... .... ... ..+ .. e+4 QN N O N N N C N M 0 to O � O p O r. O � C> O O O G J O O C> O e O O G O r w G vy ,� yr vi W� In kf i ,r; vi vi Q M C. en �� vi In �-• r rr rn rr rr rp O OO N NN �p ooao .. C 2 c�c c o O D O C O C G G •� .. ,�G, UfS ,�0... , .-. O V) 6 V) O Ln V7O V, V, C:) uN `aN ."i � � .. � M U d' M U C' M U "t M � ^3' K; U 'eF M U eY M U 7 � M ❑ � I-' � In _� N V^) M G pOp C O :cs O O R3 O a! c: ul N ON N N p N p 4.,y O N G z ON ICJ -4 o 0 C> o 0 o C7 C) o ou e> o o M C v w C C> O C7 O O v,r Inn Q C4 C'z CT Q\ CrIr a N O N SLR C' 0 "a r ao CON ON p N CT N N O PJ ,C, O �n �` T ¢¢��.. z V� hF _ ? '�a N tS" N '.G N N N C4 V N •~E.,` ••" N O �"' C C C GG h :i L � L � Y F 42 N N _ °.. V �C K3 n n 1� (N+• M Cl? N N © ,00 O O N Ci 00 00 pp 1-- 1- O an ,ar C a m m oc oo oo t>oke) a 6. a'• m U I od ou N � >•, m Cy N is nr,o •, � c �' a r� � rr F•- m o �`" .. � r io F` C[ d vw cOi pN c UM c Cr, V m `7 W Z,m 'sM C (-. _M O'`"O �F�� M_ lyye,, MVy: N o--�u r... M .W •^ '1" v d �•.. F tiJ A"�' :+-t G L'.=� — $4 r it d � d « .... N .00 U I� N O N ?= a YC`d 7 N , � W pN N .IZt0 . O 00 N a G z CID q- �•, M d 0. r a N M OOC 7 � 8 W d ;, N O v 00 cM OM G" CS o c o o 6{k �+ 6 y .p V v a�i ai ai x a - - a - - a a " � In cr GO r- ' r G G G O G G c o 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o ^ o 0 0 0 o g d 0 Cj OO 0 ell O N N Iry V: O `r CJ v' e} +f'i N N I'D O O T O C rr ..-..� N1 00 00 OD U y �� .. r F0 ts, •• �" y � o v LnCD M v 0 0 o M en ,� c �s a SC y M 0 0 o rt� Qcia r' O�• _iY.!3. O c� C M Z' U., 6 0 0 ,) C? y O y O y 0 CQ N 5 v C13 N N y ,,^., N :J N U `J U N 0 O N U f- N €� G i- � i ;•:.i " r= `'� i G r r n a3 .� �= '"' d � � G ", ° o13 0 o c c va o a u lon a o 0 0 0 o N � O M �•• O 4 C CG^ � � � N v `�' � of of U d• eF 'rY � �' 1 � � ``7 Q"' M G [-'• O let -t NO tit JO en OC Cti N f-. N N N N n N GL N C p u � O� '-' N N � 'cY N �• �y ON ON Q p � � >,� � c � � � � c. o a � G.. o R; � duo � r• � C. o.. �. -r CG •m •r ✓� c = c o _ o � •� :a^ c v5 0 •� o a C� Ca o ,r. D z z z z z z z 0 c� C t u M O a �: rr :A o0 � ^ G r 'tN d3 y M M M M M M M M O N � N N V'1 7rO � M �' M M y, in V1 a O kn ,�V.' `� !7 OvryO � t- r` N r oo a �� Fr, v: 'n N N C in N y U y � 00 m i iK cd d id iC m O DUO r- F- d v� o N Q 4 �" y �o ` o = y GC- o ff" u kn GM ,, � Q+ U m 05 a W M � = ,CM M O oo � c o �r o � �. `Zoe ^ c� cn CW N U N U =1 N nE .�". .++ U �� •to d a � M 3 � o `) � fN1 o G: vn c i ro d U � i P' = Ncn .� O � ..P V�J J n � .0 C O Can o.. G Fn ;��© �'-' •G d d v N 0Ui M M M 5 M Cd x N MO M.td O .a IT Vr �' iJ� O "� !- p CJ O w 'd .^a � O QrCi O f'-� d' d � kn Q 6+ O v z z z z z z° z z O a� c. ❑ ii C.i u a ..., =; Cd v cn rr U al 03 cn n M cc cad ,f„ y d G N u C� rA r-1 y M M M M M M M M M ® N N N N N N CV N O ^ O C5 10 M ,n oc er kn in G O ^ -•7 et Cn O O (� t- cj' {!11 00 oO 0o Oo V�; ) to CS CT M, I'lld C 00 w t- M 00 CAao v1 in ,n u. 00 W r- ON Cn 00 0�0 N N N ^.4 y y y Ri Cd 0 CH od LV 00 OJ Ew MSr, M ,7 0Ed q CN = N4 C) "" N v L4 N �, � '• p cq �` [d) ,UN 'c;v O •cd N � � J od O o_0 `�00 N p Gs .7'. }d N J` W d Qi� � o � UV a � a C s o n o d o 0 Cd � r , } oo o nTQ � c 00 s 000 q 'J�� VN1 „ CV L.] CM? O � O N M O ^ 00 N^ oco + o d � c � c � m 2 � c 9 \ » � � � . . » a \ / # 0 w � y : / $ . k e » � r \ / \ � \ \ % \ � . e « `\ \ s � . % # i � % f » y � � & � � ± & � � / r A� � � 6 Mr � � \ � � � y � � ® & / � � S � ,. � ` ` ; %» � ¢ U � / o <��� � � « � � �� � k w & & y \ » _ k � � ®� ¥� � — \ \ &� # o t4 Ln O r4 "a C.0 m CP O 00 00 00 GO CGS 00 fn 5 C-- e) C-4 ell 00 as 03 cli C-A 0 CA 0 — 0 C2 0 rM 00 i-A N y C O � C � C � G Q ti 7, N r r r OQ N C. w O � ... N G M 4. 4rr? w d M M � � NO C O Q G {? �j O C7 s.+ O :w+ C [C O C � tl N N N r y N N N c N M O M 00 ..ad.. w f3 O J1 et [� v M [N•- UCr �` Q J C) V1 O xl o j r, v cv a N W 00 GJ 46 tiG C" 'C THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO ". MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 08/06/2012 CONSENT ITEM#: 5 MOTION Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: Reschedule November 5,2013 Council Meeting SUBMITTED BY: Adam Bell,City Clerk THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger,City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Cathy Bendel,Finance Director Beckie Gumatz,Program Assistant SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS rifremoved from Consent): - Introduction of Item.......................................................................................City Administrator - Report/Presentation..............................................................................................Mayor Pearson - Questions from Council to Staff......................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input,if Appropriate.............................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion........................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion................................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion.............................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of the Consent Agenda, the City Council is respectfully requested to officially reschedule the November 5, 2013 City Council meeting in order to comply with state law. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to fizrther discuss this rescheduling, they caza remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the rescheduling by taking the following action or amending as necessary: "Move to amend the 2013 Lake Elmo Cate Council Meeting Calendar by rescheduling the November 5 meeting to November 6,2013." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per MN State Statutes, a city is not allowed to conduct a public meeting between the hours of 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM on the day of an election. A special election has been. called for ISD 834 (Stillwater), which includes Lake Elmo, and will take place on November 5, 2013. November 5 is also the date of a previously scheduled Lake Elmo City Council Meeting. In order to comply with Minn. Stat. § 204C.03, the City Council must either change the time of its meeting or change the date. Changing the meeting time is not a practical solution at this time. As with previous date conflicts,the Council has historically rescheduled the date of the meeting. Staff initially solicited input from the Council as to what dates would be the best option for rescheduling. At the July 16, 2013 meeting it was recommended that the 1115113 meeting be rescheduled to 11/06/13. Staff recommends that the November 5 meeting be rescheduled.to Wednesday,November 6 at 7:00 PM. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council officially reschedule the November 5, 2013 City Council meeting as proposed. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this rescheduling, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the rescheduling by taking the following action or amending as necessary: "Move to amend the 2013 Lake Elmo City Council Meeting Calendar by rescheduling the November S meeting to November 6, 2013. ATTACHMENTS: None AUTHORITY- 2012 Minnesota Statutes: §204C.03 PU13LIC MEETINGS PROHIBITED ON ELECTION DAY. Subdivision I.School districts; counties; municipalities; special taxing districts. No special taxing district governing body,school board,county board of commissioners,city council, or town board of supervisors shall conduct a meeting between 6:00 p.m.and 8:00 p.m.on the day that an election is held witivn the boundaries of the special taxing district,school.district,county,city,or town. As used in this subdivision,"special taxing district"has the meaning given in section 275.066. 'ITY OF TT IF C LAKE ELMO ". MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 CONSENT ITEM#: 6 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization for John Schiltz to dispense beer and wine coolers at the Lake Elmo Days event on.September 6 and 7,2013. SUBMITTED BY: Alyssa MacLeod,Taxpayer Relations &Communications Coordinator THROUGH: Dean Zuleger,City Administrator REVIENA,D BY: Adam.Bell,City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item...................................................................................................Staff - Report/Presentation....................................................................................................Staff - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input,if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of the Consent Agenda, the City Council is requested to consider authorization for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event on September 6 & 7, 2013. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion, is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this authorization, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn. a municipal retail on-sale liquor license bolder, to dispense beer and wine coolers gffpren ses and allow.for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Dogs event being held September b and 7, 2013." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Pursuant to MN State Statute 340A.404 Subd. 4(b), under Special provisions; sports, conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals,the governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off 1 premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 340A.409 to cover the event. The City of Lake Elmo, in conjunction with local businesses and the community, will hold the Lake Elmo Days event on September 6 and 7,2013. Authorization is necessary for the safe sale of alcohol at the event and to confirm the requirement of liability insurance for the municipal on-sale license holder. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial cost to the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize as part of the Consent Agenda for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and.allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event being held September 6 and 7, 2013. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal notion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this authorization,they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize.Iohn Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inca, a iunicipal retail oar-sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers oJ`f premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set,for the City's Lake Elino Days event being held,September 6 and 7,2013." AUTHORITY: 2012 Minnesota Statutes: §340A.404 INTOXICATING LIQUOR; ON-SALE LICENSES. Subd. 4.Special provisions; sports,conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals. (b) The governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 340A.409 to cover the event. 2 THE CIT'Y OF MAYOR. & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 CONSENT ITEM#: 7 i AGENDA ITEM: Library Board Appointment SUBMITTED BY: Mayor Mike Pearson THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator RENTIENVED BY: Dean Zuleger,City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if rem owd tront Consent 1 Introduction of item ...City Administrator j - Report/Presentation.................................................................................Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff..................... ....Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion...........................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion...................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Brett Emmons to the Lake Elmo Library Board as all alternate member for a two-year term." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per MN State Statutes, the mayor of a municipality has the authority and responsibility to appoint members of the local library board. The appointment must be affirmed by the members of the City Council. In 2011, the Mayor appointed five regular members and three alternates to the newly created Lake Elmo Library Board. Board members are appointed to staggered 1-Year, 2-Year, and 3-Year terms. Due to attrition, there is currently one alternate board position that needs to be filled. RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends that the City of Lake Elmo City Council as part of the Consent Agenda affirm the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Library Board by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Brett Emmons to the Lake Elmo Libraiy Board as an alternate ntember.ior a two-year term.s9 1 THEE CITY <.N' AKE . MAYOR COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 8 AGENDA ITEM: EDA Appointment SUBMITTED BY: Mayor Mike Pearson THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk SC GGEST'ED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed Pont ean.sent : - Introduction of Item..........................................................................City Administrator Report/Presentation.................................................................................Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff.........................................................Mayor Facilitates Public Input,if Appropriate................................................................Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion...........................................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion...................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion................................................................................ Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOCJESTED: The City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Economic Development Authority. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Council Member Nelson to the Lake Elmo Economic 1Y� Developni.ent Authorin,.99 BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2013, The City Council authorized the creation of a local Economic Development Authority (EDA). Per MN State Statutes, the mayor of a municipality has the authority and responsibility to appoint members of the local EDA. The appointment must be affirmed by the members of the City Council. In 2013,the Mayor appointed five regular members and one alternate to the newly created Lake Elmo EDA. In addition, two members of the Council are required to be appointed to the EDA. Mayor Pearson appointed himself and Council Member Park to the authority. Due to Council Member Park's resignation effective July 16, 2013, there is currently a vacancy on the EDA that needs to be filled by a Council Member. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None 'f RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends that the City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Economic Development Authority. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. if the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Council Member Nelson to the Lake Elmo Economic Development Autharity,. AUTHORITN". 2012 Minnesota Statutes: § 469.095 COMMISSIONERS; APPOINTMENT, 'PERMS, VACANCIES, PAY, REMOVAL. Subdivision. 2.Appointment, terms; vacancies (EXCERPTED). (c) Seven-member authority: the commissioners constituting a seven-member authority, two of whom must be members of the city council, shall be appointed by the mayor with the approval of the city council. Those initially appointed shall be appointed for terms of one, two,three, four, and five years respectively and two members for six years. Thereafter all commissioners shall be appointed for six-year terms. (fj A vacancy is created in the membership of an authority when a city council member of the authority ends council membership. A vacancy for this or another reason must be filled for the balance of the unexpired term, in the manner in which the original appointment was made. The city council may set the term of the commissioners who are members of the city council to coincide with their term of office as members of the city council. 2 THE CITY OF LAKE F—LN40 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE-- 8/6/13 REGULAR. ITEM#-. 9 RESOLUTION 2013-064 AGENDA ITEM: Savona Residential Subdivision(Lennar)Preliminary Plat SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt,Planning Director THROUGH: Dean A.Zuleger,City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson,City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer Planning Commission SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item...................................................................................................Staff - Report/Presentation.......................................................................... .........................Staff - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate.................. ................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion.................................. ............................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT The Planning Commission has previously reviewed a sketch plan for the Savona Subdivision. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the City Council review and approval a preliminary plat before an applicant may proceed with the preparation and recording of a final plat. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD — The City will require that the applicant enter into a developer's agreement with the City to specify the financial responsibilities for various aspects of the subdivision and related public improvements. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to consider a preliminary plat request from Lennar Corporation for a 3 1.0 unit residential development to be located on 112.6 acres west of Keats Avenue and within the City's 1-94 corridor planning area. The proposed plat would be located on property owned.by two different entities, including Dale Properties and the Frandsen Bank and Trust, and would be situated immediately cast of Keats Avenue and approximately 1/4mile north of 1-94. The preliminary plat has been prepared in response to the City's recently ad-opted Comprehensive Plan for the corridor, which guides this area for low and medium density urban residential development. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending that the City Council approve the preliminary plat with 28 conditions of approval as listed in the attached resolution and by taking the following action with the following motion: "Motion to adopt Resolution Nlo. 2013-064 approving the Savona preliminary,plat with 28 conditions of approval" f BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached is the original detailed Staff report that was provided to the Planning Commission regarding the applicant's request for a preliminary plat,which includes general information about the application, details concerning the request,a summary of the relevant planning and zoning issues, a thorough review and analysis of the preliminary plat(including a draft list of recommended conditions of approval),draft findings,and the Staff recommendation to the Planning Commission. Because the Planning Commission tabled taking action on the preliminary plat during its initial review meeting, Staff also prepared the attached"response matrix" document that was drafted to address specific questions and comments that were raised during the course of the public hearing. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat application at its July 22,2013 meeting and conducted a public hearing on the request at this time. The Commission closed the public hearing,but elected to table taking action on the application until its July 290'meeting with a request that a representative of the Parks Commission attend this meeting to discuss parkland issues. Because the Commission received comments from several individuals during the hearing,and also heard testimony from the Park Commission chair and additional individuals at the July 29th meeting, Staff has attached a copy of the Commission's approved June 22nd meeting minutes along with a copy of the draft minutes from the June 29"'meeting. These minutes also include a detailed description of the Planning Commission's discussion and action on the preliminary plat. During the course of the public hearing and subsequent meeting discussion,the primary issue that was debated focused on the amount of park land that the applicant was proposing to dedicate as part of the subdivision. The Park Commission chair did address the Planning Commission on this matter and noted that the amount of land being dedicated by the developer was deemed adequate by the Park Commission. The applicant also presented two rough concepts depicting how the park area could be used to accommodate various activities on the site(these drawings are attached for consideration by the Council). Additionally,the Planning Commission raised several questions about the density of the development, and in particular,why the City was using a range to determine the densities allowed in areas guided for low density urban residential. The"Staff Response Matrix"provides Staffs response to these questions, which includes the conclusion that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the densities included in the Comprehensive Plan for the site. The Planning Commission also received a request from Charlie Devine, speaking on behalf of the potential developer of land to the west of the Savona subdivision and representing the property owners of this land,that the 5"'Street minor collector road be realigned to enter their property further to the south. He asked that the Commission include a condition of approval that would require the applicant to resolve the road alignment to the satisfaction of both parties prior to proceeding with a final plat for the subdivision. Staff did not recommend that such a condition be added as part of the Planning Commission recommending,and noted that road as depicted in the preliminary plat is consistent with the general alignment identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff did make modifications to the recommended list of conditions that would allow the realignment to occur prior to submission of a final plat(but would not otherwise mandate the road being moved to a new location). The Commission did modify some of the conditions of approval as originally recommended by Staff,and. the final list of conditions as further refined the Planning Commission are included in Resolution No. 2013-064. The Commission recommended approval of the preliminary plat as submitted with 28 conditions of approval. Of the five commissioners present,three supported to motion to recommend approval of the plat while two commissioners voted against this motion. The members that did not support the recommendation indicated that they wanted to see additional land dedicated for public park purposes on the plat. i PLANNING COMMISSION RECCOMENDA,TION: I� 4 Based upon the above background information,Staff report and Planning Commission recommendation; p � it is recommended that the City Council approve the Savona preliminary plat with the 28 conditions of i approval as documented in the resolution of approval by taking the following action/with the following motion: "Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2013-064 approving the,Savona prelhuinarj,plat with 8 conditions of approval.. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No.2013-064 2. Detailed Staff Report to Planning Commission(7/22/13) 3. Staff Response to Meeting Comments 4. Preliminary Landscape Plan Review Comments 5. Application Form(3) 6. Property Owner Contact Information 7. Woodland Evaluation Report 8. Review Comments: a. City Engineer b. Washington County c. Building Official d. Valley Branch Watershed District. 9. 5th Street Concept Plans(Damon Farber Associates) 10. Planning Commission Minutes: a. July 22,2013 b. July 29,2013 11. Written Comments: a. Statement from Dale Properties b. Todd Williams c. Rolf Larson 12. Concept Sketches for Park Area 13. Updated Preliminary Site Plan 14. Preliminary Plat and Plans(23 sheets) i E f I� V 1 I t CIT1j7 OF LAKE EL MO 'ASHING TON COUNTY,TY, MINNESOTA SOLUTION NO. 2013-064 A .RESOL UTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SAVONA WHEREAS,the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS,U.S. Home Corporation(d/b/a Lennar), 16305 36 b Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth,MN acting on behalf of Dale Properties, LLC and Frandsen Bank and Trust (Applicant)has submitted an application to the City of Lake Elmo (City) for a Preliminary Plat for Savona, a copy of which is on file in the City of Lake Elmo Planning and Zoning Department; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held public hearing on July 22,2013 to consider the Preliminary Plat request and continued discussion on the Preliminary Plat at its July 29, 2013 meeting ; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and recommendation concerning the Preliminary Plat as part of a memorandum to the City Council from Director of Planning Kyle Klatt for the August 6, 2013 Council Meeting; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning:Commission adopted a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Plat at its meeting held on August 6, 20 i 3 and made the following findings of fact: 1) That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 2) That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential and Urban:Medium Density Residential zoning district standards. 3) That the Savona preliminary plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water,sediment and erosion control and other ordinances. 4) That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. 5) That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the City's engineering standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated July 9, 2013. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve the preliminary plat for Savona subject to the following conditions: 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall complete the following: a) the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney;b)the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat; c)the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the "Exception"parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight-foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room for drainage and utilities adjacent to"Street A". 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green belt/buffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. 4) The eight-foot bituminous trail located within Outlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to "Street A". 5) The trail within the green belt/buffer area must be located within the southern one-third or eastern one-third of the buffer and as close as possible to the lots within the Savona subdivision. 6) The sidewalk along"Street A"must continue along this street until its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. 7) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Keats Avenue. 8) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all. areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. 9) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of a final plat and final construction plans. 10)Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi-family housing portion of the subdivision. 11)The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue(CSAH 19)right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3, 2013. The required improvements shall include,but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten-foot bituminous trail through the median, turn lanes, and other improvements as required by the County. 12)The applicant shall observe all other County requirements as specified in the Washington County review letter dated July 3, 2013. 13)The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 14)The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically, the rearrangement of lots around the"Exception"parcel. 15)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. 16)The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision.Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted.for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 17)Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. 18)The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area (either public or private) within the multi-family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 19)No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat(1.55) may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south, Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) to the west, or back to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) through the property to the north of Savona. 20)A future realignment of 5'h Street along the western border of the plat may be considered by the City Council as part of the final plat submission for this are provided the realignment does not result in any significant modifications to the preliminary plat. 21)The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 22)The preliminary grading,drainage and erosion control.plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. 23)The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate all proposed improvements within the 53' Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Damon Farber and Associates. 24)All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9,2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a (final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas line,if necessary. b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas.Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water ponding. 25)The City will not accept an application for final plat approval until the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 has been ordered by the City Council. If the City Council does not order this project,the applicant must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 26)The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi-family area, including but not limited to a conditional use permit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street, at the time a final.plat is submitted for this area. 27)The applicant is encouraged.to preserve or re-use as many trees as possible that are currently located on the former golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. 28)The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. Passed and duly adopted this 6"' day of August 2013 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo,Minnesota. Mike Pearson,Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk TI ff" CITY. OF PLANNING COMMISSION K E EL MO DATE: 7/22/13 AGENDA ITEM: 4A—PUBLIC HEARING CASE#201.3-22 ITEM: Savona Residential Subdivision—Preliminary Plat SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt,Planning Director REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Preliminary Plat request from Lennar Corporation for a 310 unit residential development to be located on 112:6 acres west of Keats Avenue and within the City's 1-94 corridor planning area. Staff is recommending approval of the request subject to compliance with a series of conditions as noted in this report. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: U.S.Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar, 16305 36`"Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth,MN Property Owners: Dale Properties,LLC and Frandsen Bank and Trust Location: Part of Section 34 in Lake Elmo,north of 1-94,west of Keats Avenue, and south of Goose Lake. PID Numbers 34.029.21.34.0003; 34.029.21.34.0001; 34,029.21.31,0001; 34.029.21.42.0001; 34.023.21.41.0004 Request: Application for preliminary plat approval of a 310 unit residential subdivision to be named Savona. Existing Land. Use and Zoning: Agricultural land, closed and abandoned golf driving range and practice facility. Current Zoning: RT—Rural Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR and MDR Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North—active mining and gravel operation; west, south and east —agricultural land Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential (2.5—4 units per acre) and Urban Medium Density Residential(4.5 —7 units per acre) History: Sketch Plan review by Planning Commission on 1.2/10/12. EAW approved by the City Council on 7/2/1.3. Deadline f)r Action: Application Complete--7/14/1.3 60 Day Deadline--8/13/13 Extension Letter Mailed—No 120 Day Deadline— 1.0/12/1.3 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a— ACTION ITEM 2 Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153—Subdivision Regulations Article 10—Urban Residential Districts(LDR) §l 50.270 Storm Water,Erosion, and Sediment REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received a request from Lennar Corporation for a preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 113 acres of land located within the I-94 Corridor planning area into 310 single family and multi-family housing sites. The proposed plat would be located on property currently owned by two different entities,including Dale Properties and the Frandsen Bank and Trust, and would be located immediately west of Keats Avenue roughly 1/4 of a mile north of the 1- 94 right-of-way. The 40-acre parcel currently owned by the Frandsen Bank that is included in the preliminary plat was formerly used as a.golf driving range and practice facility. This facility ceased operation over five years ago and has sat vacant ever since. The remainder of the area to be platted is currently owned by Dale Properties and is currently used for agricultural purposes. The preliminary plat has been developed in response to the City's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan,which identifies the bulk of the applicant's property for urban low density residential development with a small portion that is guided for medium density residential development. The plat incorporates 188 single family lots,most of which are designed with a width of 65 or 75 feet, and 122 single family attached residential units that would be constructed in buildings with four to eight connected units. The multi-family area is located adjacent to Keats Avenue and would be located on the southern half of the Frandsen site while the single family lots would extend throughout the rest of the platted area. The preliminary plat also includes a major portion of the proposed 5ch Street Minor Collector road as planned in.the City's Transportation Plan. This minor collector road will serve as the primary access for the Savona Subdivision,and will also act as the dividing point between the planned low density residential and the medium density residential/commercial areas along the corridor. The plat incorporates all of 5t' Street adjacent to the Savona-subdivision,which represents the first segment of a major roadway that is planned to eventually connect Manning Avenue(CSAH 15) to Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13). Consistent with the City's specifications for this roadway segment,the applicant has provided for a 120-foot wide right-of-way,which will provide sufficient room for the construction of a parkway with turning lanes, 10-foot bituminous trail, sidewalk,trees, lighting, and. other design elements as planned by the City. This subdivision is the City's first subdivision that will receive public sanitary sewer service, and because it is the first subdivision to be platted after adoption of the revised Comprehensive Plan, there are several ongoing planning efforts that are happening concurrent with this request. Most importantly, the applicant and several other property owners within the immediate area have petitioned the City to extend sewer and water services to the area. The planned improvements include a new sewer Iift station to be sited on the property north of the proposed plat, the construction of a sewer main that will connect to the regional sewer interceptor within the Eagle Point Business Park, and the extension of water lines that will provide a connection to the Ciq,'s water system. At present,the City's water for this area is provided by the City of Oakdale;however, Lake Elmo's long-range water plans call for an eventual connection to the City's water system via a new line along Inwood Avenue. There is enough capacity in the Oakdale system to provide water to the Lennar development, and a significant portion of the area around the proposed plat,until Lake Elmo can make the needed connections to its system. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a —ACTION ITEM 3 One of the other major features of the proposed subdivision is a series of outlots that will provide for open space,trails, and storm water management throughout the development area. Based on an initial review of the proposed park system with the Lake Elmo Park Commission,the applicant is proposing one smaller neighborhood park near the center of the development with a series of trails providing connections in all directions outside of the platted area. The development also incorporates a bufferlgreenway area along the northern boundary of the plat adjacent to an existing RE—Residential Estates subdivision as required in the City's Comprehensive Plan. All outlots that are planned for park land or storm water use will be deeded to the City,while the future home owner's association will retain ownership of the remaining outlots. Please note that since the application for a preliminary plat was deemed complete by the City, the applicant has submitted a reviewed preliminary plat document in order to respond to review comments from the City related to the extreme western portion of the site. In particular,the plat as submitted did not properly provide for future trail connections around an exception parcel and the proposed road connections to the west did not line up with current concept plans for the adjacent property. Because the revised plat was submitted recently, the applicant has not gone back an updated the corresponding construction documents accordingly. Because the affected area is relatively small and does not result in any significant deviations from the construction plans, Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission.proceed with its review with the understanding that the construction plans will need to be updated in advance of any further City reviews. The number of proposed residential units did trigger a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)under State law, and the City has recently approved this study. The end result of the EAW was that there are no major environmental impacts that are anticipated with the proposed development. The City did receive several comments regarding the proposed development from the reviewing agencies and will continue to review these comments as the development progresses towards final plat approval. The applicant is proposing to bring forward a final plat for the Savona development in stages, starting with the single family portion of the site adjacent to Keats Avenue and then working westward on the site. At this time, the applicant anticipates that the multi-family area will be the last portion of the site to be constructed. In addition,the applicant has requested a rezoning of the site in order to remove the current transitional zoning that is in place and to zone the site in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending that the zoning action be delayed by the City until after the preliminary plat approval (and either before or in conjunction with any final platting of the subdivision) since the boundary between the LDR and MDR areas will.not be defined until 5"' Street is platted. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES The Savona site is guided for urban low density and urban medium density development in the City's . Comprehensive Plan,and the applicant has proposed to zone the corresponding portions of the site LDR.—Low Density Residential and MRD--Medium Density Residential respectively. The plans labeled as"site context" in the included packet of information depict the exact areas that will be zoned in this manner. The overall subdivision plan has therefore been prepared in order to comply with the district standards for the LDR and MDR districts in terms of lot size, lot widths,building setbacks,and other design criteria. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a— ACTION ITEM 4 The arrangement of lots and blocks follows a very loose grid pattern as one moves from east to west through the subdivision, but with a considerable amount of curving throughout the road network. A significant feature of the subdivision is a north/south trail connection that follows an old fence row dividing the site, with the streets and lots in this portion of the site looping around the trail. This allows for the placement of a smaller park area in the middle of plat that is able to take advantage of one of the few areas on the site with any significant trees. The subdivision has also been designed in a manner to provide for future connections to the properties to the north and to the west either through local streets or trough access to the 5"' Street Minor Collector road. All streets have been designed to comply with the City's current street standards, which exceed the minimum levels required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Sidewalks and trails are planned throughout the subdivision, and Staff is recommending that sidewalks be installed on at least one side of all streets in the single family portion of the plat. The proposed plans provide for sidewalks consistent with the Staff recommendation. Within the multi- family area Staff has asked that the developer provide sidewalk on both sides of the street, in which case the plans need to be updated in order to comply with this expectation. In.addition to the internal trails and sidewalks that are proposed by the developer,the City has asked that the 5a'Street Corridor include a I 0-foot bituminous trail on one side of the road and a six-foot sidewalk on the opposite side. The proposed plans conform to this request as well. A typical lot building plan(detail)is included as part of the attached subdivision packet,and each lot as depicted in the plans includes a description of the lot size, dimensions, and all required setbacks. There are two general lot sizes proposed for the single family area with average dimensions of 65 by 140 feet and 75 by 140 feet. All of the lots meet the City's minimum area requirement of 8,000 for single family lots in a LDR district,with the smallest lot proposed at 8,451 square feet. The site plans further illustrate that throughout the single family area the lots will average 11, 17.5 square feet, which exceeds the minimum requirements by a fairly wide margin. There is not as much detail provided for the multi-family area, which will be subject to additional reviews in order be developed as planned. In particular,the City's MDR zoning district standards specify that certain situations require a conditional use permit, including the construction of single family attached dwellings without frontage on a public street. Because the applicant is proposing to utilize private streets to serve the proposed multi-family buildings, a conditional use permit will need to be submitted along with the final plat request for this portion of the site. There are other standards associated with the MDR zoning district that will require the submission of more detailed plans for the buildings that are proposed in the multi-family portion of the plat. The following is a general summary of the subdivision design elements that have proposed as part of the Savona preliminary plat and plans: Zoning and Site Information: ® Existing Zoning: RT--Rural Transitional Proposed Zoning: LDR(92 acres) and MDR(21 acres) Total Site Area: 113 acres(not including Outlot M) Total Residential Units: 310 Proposed Density(Net): 3 units per acre— Single Family area. 6.7 units per acre—Multi-Family area ® RE,C Units from Comp Plan: 286 (covers less area than proposed plat) PUBLIC HEARENG ITEM 4a—ACTION ITEM 5 Proposed Lot Dimensional Standards: • Min. Lot Width: 65 ft. • Lot Depth: 128 ft. (140 ft.typical) • Lot Area: 8,000 sq. ft. (8,451 min.) Front Yard Setback: 25 ft. Side Yard Setback: 7.5 ft. (average) 0) Rear Yard Setback: 20 ft. Proposed Street Standards: • ROW Width—Local 60 ft. (per Subdivision Ordinance) • ROW Width—Minor Collector 120 feet • Street Widths—Local: 28 ft.(per City standard) • Street Width—Minor Collector Varies—parkway design proposed The standards listed above are all in compliance with the applicable requirements from the City's zoning and subdivision regulations. Based on Staffs review of the preliminary plat,the applicant has demonstrated compliance with all applicable code requirements at the level of detail that is required for a preliminary plat. As with any new subdivision the City Code requires that a portion of the plat be set aside for public park use. In this case,the applicant has indicated that certain outlot areas will be dedicated to the City for this purpose,including Outlots A and F and a portion of Outlot E. Since a large portion these areas represent green belt or trail corridors and are not suitable for other types of active recreation usage, it is Staffs recommendation that the City only accept the trail corridors as part of the park land dedication requirements if the developer constructs the planned trail over these areas in conjunction with other required infrastructure improvements. As a general policy, Staff is recommending that the City consider accepting smaller land dedications in exchange for a more robust and connected trail system that will provide access to the City's numerous parks(including the regional.park preserve). The Subdivision Ordinance requires 10% of the land in urban residential districts to be set aside as open space,which totals 11.3 acres. The areas to be dedicated for public use add up to 6.4 acres, which leaves the applicant 4.9 acres short of the required land dedication. If the City chooses to accept smaller amount of land dedication,the developer will be required to pay a fee equivalent to the fair market value of this 4.9 acres. This payment would be places in the City's park land fund, and could be used to acquire new park land or trail corridors or for the improvement of existing park areas. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS City Staff has reviewed the proposed preliminary plat, which has gone through several versions in advance of the formal application being accepted as complete by the City. During the course of these reviews,several of the issues and concerns that were pointed out by Staff have been addressed by the applicant with updated submission documents;however,there are other elements of the plat that must still be addressed or corrected by the applicant. In general,the proposed plat will meet all applicable City requirements for approval, and any deficiencies or additional work that is needed is noted as part of the review record. As the initial subdivision to be developed within one of the City's PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a-- ACTION ITEM 6 urban service areas,there are several things happening in and around the Savona subdivision that will have an impact on the project, including the larger assessment project that will bring water and sewer services into this area,the ongoing work to plan for a significant minor collector road to meet the transportation needs of this area, and the plans from adjacent property owners to develop their properties. Given the location of the subdivision in an area that will be seeing significant changes in the near future, Staff recognizes that this initial plat will have a number of issues that will need to be resolved in the future. The City has received a detailed list of comments from the City Engineer and the Washington County concerning the proposed subdivision, in addition to general comments from the Valley Branch Watershed District,Building Official, and the Fire Chief, all of which are attached for consideration by the Commission. In addition to the general comments that have been provided in the preceding sections of this report, Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider the issues and comments related to the following discussion areas as well: • Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan for this area and with the densities that were approved as part of this plan. The net densities for the development fall within the ranges allowed for the urban low density and urban medium density land use categories. Furthermore,the overall number of REC units planned matches the overall numbers that were used for projecting the unit counts in this area. Other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan relate to the Savona subdivision as follows: o Transportation. The City's transportation plan calls for the construction of a minor collector road that will connect the eastern and western portions of the 1-94 Corridor. Staff views this road as a critical piece of the transportation infrastructure that is needed to serve the densities that have been planned for this area. Lennar has incorporated the right-of-way at the width necessary to construct the minor collector as part of its preliminary plat. o Parks. The City's park plan identifies proposed locations for neighborhood parks based on the anticipated population that should be served by each park. In addition to the existing Stonegate Park,the plan calls for at least two additional parks in the vicinity of the Savona Plat, one in the middle of the proposed development area and one off the applicant's site closer to Goose Lake. As noted earlier by Staff,the Park Commission did review the Savona sketch plan and generally agreed with concept of having a smaller"pocket/neighborhood"park serve the subdivision along with a series of trails providing connections to the Stonegate Park.and other local and regional parks and trails. o Water. Water will eventually be provided to this area via a future extension of the system along Inwood Avenue. The Savona subdivision will be able to be served under the City's current agreement with the City of Oakdale until the Inwood extension is completed. o Sanitary Sewer. Lennar will be required to connect to the sewer main being constructed as part of the Section 34 area wide assessment project. In this case, alI of the property owners that are planned to be served by sanitary sewer have petitioned PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a—ACTION ITEM the City to construct the required sewer and water mains to serve the area. The utility plans for Savona are consistent with the proposed assessment project. o Phasing. The Savona subdivision is located within the Stage I phasing area for the 1- 94 Corridor and therefore the proposed development is acceptable as the first development within the planned urban residential areas. • Zoning. The proposed zoning for the Savona site will be split between the LDR—Low Density Residential and the MDR—Medium Density Residential zoning districts. The submitted development plans demonstrate compliance with the City's urban residential zoning requirements;however, additional details will need to be provided for the multi- family area.in order to fully review the plans for this area. Single family detached housing is a permitted use under the code, while certain aspects of the multi-family project may require a conditional use permit(CUP). If a CUP is required for the multi-family portion of the project, this request may be submitted in conjunction with a final plat for this part of the site. The applicant has indicated that the multi-family development will comply with the City's requirements for open space for such developments. • Subdivision Requirements. The City's Subdivision Ordinance includes a fairly lengthy list of standards that must be met by all new subdivisions, and include requirements for blocks, lots,easements, erosion and sediment control,drainage systems,monuments, sanitary sewer and water facilities, streets, and other aspects of the plans. For instance, the Ordinance includes limitations on the maximum length of a block.(1,800 feet),and based on the spacing of the proposed streets,the Savona plat complies with this requirement. The majority of these requirements have been addressed as part of the City Engineer's comments{which are summarized below)or have been reviewed as part of Staff s ongoing communications with the applicant regarding the project. • Infrastructure. The developer will be required to construct all streets, sewer,water, stonrn water ponds,and other infrastructure necessary to serve the development. Because the Savona subdivision is not adjacent to any existing utilities,the developer has joined a.petition with other property owners in the area to have the City undertake a project to build the required water and sewer mains(and required sewer lift station)and then assess the cost of this work back to the benefiting property owners. Because the installation of the infrastructure covered under the assessment project is critical.to providing services to Savona, Staff has included a condition on the approval of the preliminary plat what requires this project to be ordered before the applicant may proceed with a final plat. • Landscaping. The Planning Department has completed a detailed review of the City's landscaping requirements for the project, and due to the length of these particular comments, has attached this review as a.separate document. In general, the landscape plans does meet the City's requirements; however, Staff is recommending that this plan be reviewed by a landscape architect prior to approval of the final plat. • Tree Preservation and protection. The City recently adopted a tree preservation and. protection ordinance;however, this ordinance was not effective at the time the applicant submitted its plat. The applicant did prepare a woodland evaluation.report(attached)that indicates there are not a large number of significant trees on the site. Most of the remaining PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a— ACTION ITEM 8 trees are located along a fence row that will be preserved as part of a trail corridor through the middle of the project. Other trees are located in very small clusters on the western portion of the property or were planted as part of the golf facility over ten years ago. Staff is recommending that as a condition of approval the applicant be required to install fencing around all trees to be preserved prior to the commencement of any grading activity. Staff is also asking that the applicant move as many of the existing trees on the golf facility site as possible and incorporate these trees into the landscape plans for Savona. • Green Belt/Buffer. The Comprehensive Plan identifies an area north of the Savona Plat and south of the Stonegate subdivision as a green belt/buffer space with a minimum width of 100 feet. The Savona subdivision includes an area that has been design to comply with this aspect of the Comprehensive Plan; however,there are two areas where the green belt as shown does not appear to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. First,the green space near Lots 1 and 2 or Block 10 does not follow a consistent 100 feet from the Stonegate neighborhood and must be increased in width in order to comply The trail in this portion of the plat must also be pulled away from adjacent property lines and will need to continue into the property to the north. Secondly,the trail that would allow for public dedication of the green belt does not continue around the exception parcel in the extreme northwest portion of the plat. Staff is recommending that the applicant dedicate a minimum width of 30 feet around the exception parcel in order to provide enough room to construct a trail, and must also include the continuation of this trail as part of the plans for the project. With these revisions to the plat/plans, Staff believes that that green belt/buffer requirements of the Comprehensive Plan would be met by the applicant. • Exception Parcel. The depth of exception parcel in the northwest portion of the site is shown on the plat at 250 feet. Staff has received a survey from the applicant for the entire parcel that shows that this measurement should be 262 feet. The applicant will need to update the preliminary plat to reflect the correct measurements for this parcel. • Streets and Transportation. The proposed street system has been designed to comply with all applicable subdivision requirements and City engineering standards. As noted in the City Engineer's report, Staff is recommending that"Street A"and "Street E" be re-aligned in manner that provides a more direct connection between 51h Street and the eventual development that will take place to the north of Savona. The City Engineer has also requested that additional.right-of-way be secured at the intersection of 5th Street and the future street providing a connection to the property to be retained by Dale Properties to the south. Staff further is requesting that the plans for 5rh Street include all design elements as requested by the City, including the street trees, landscaping, lighting, signage, median plantings, and fencing proposed as part of the City's recent theming project with Damon and Farber Associates. A 51h Street concept that.has been prepared by the City's consultant has been provided to the applicant and is attached for review by the Planning Commission. o County Comments. Comments from Washington County, which focus on needed improvements to Keats Avenue(CSAH 19) to serve the development, are noted below. o Temporary Dead End Roads. Because the time table for construction of road improvements on the property to the north in unknown at this point in time,the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a—ACTION ITEM 9 applicant will need to plan for temporary turn-arounds on those streets that will eventually connect to the Hammes site. • ,Street Names. Staff is continuing to work on implementing a clear and consistent naming system for new streets in the community and has not yet had time to consider street names within the Savona subdivision. As a condition of approval, Staff is asking that the applicant continue to work with the City at developing street names for the project, and that these names be included with the final plat submission. • Adjacent Parcels. The proposed plat provides street and trail connections(with the one exception noted above)to adjacent parcels, and these connection are consistent with the latest plans that Staff has received from the adjoining property owners. Please note that the property owner to the west has requested that 5`� Street follow a more southerly alignment in the western portion of the Savona plat. Staff has noted that any re-alignment of this roadway may be considered as an amendment to the plat in the future. At this point in time, Staff is not aware that the property owner(Dale Properties)has consented to a change in this road alignment. • City Engineer Review. The City Engineer has provided the Planning Department with a detailed comment letter as a summary of his preliminary plat review. Staff has incorporated the more significant issues identified by the Engineer as part of the recommended conditions of approval, and has also included a general condition that all issues identified by the City Engineer must be addressed by the applicant prior to approval of a final plat for any portion of the Savona subdivision. The Engineer does note that the proposed plat complies with the City's standards with one exception related to sidewalk grades,but does recommend approval of this exception due to difficulties that are primarily related to current site conditions. • Fire Department Review. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plat and has requested that any cul-de-sacs(including those with islands)be designed to allow for the efficient turning movement of larger fire vehicles. He has also asked that the spacing of fire hydrants comply with the City's requirements. The City Engineer will be taking these comments into consideration during its review of future construction plans for this subdivision. • Washington County Review. County Staff has reviewed the Savona plat and provided specific comments to the City in a letter dated July 3, 2013. The most significant of the County's concerns is that the applicant will need to make improvements to the County road system in order to provide the necessary access to Savona. As a condition of approval, Staff has noted that the applicant will be responsible for including all improvements to TH.1.9 as required by the County as part of the construction plans for the development, and that the developer will be responsible for constructing these improvements, which will include the construction of a new median crossing within the THH19 right-of-way,the removal of the existing median crossing,construction of a trail trough this median, and the installation of turn lanes into the development. • Watershed Districts. The project area lies within two watershed districts,the Valley Branch Watershed District and the South Washington Watershed District. Both entities have previous provided comments to the City as part of the EAW for the project, and the PUBLIC HEARrNG ITEM 4a— ACTION ITEM 10 developer will need to secure permits from Loth watershed districts in order to proceed with the development as planned. w EA W Comments. The City of Lake Elmo received comments from eight agencies as part of the EAW review. The City Council provided a response to the comments and ultimately approved the EAW, These comments will be kept on record and will be used to help guide the City's review of the preliminary and final construction plans for the site. Based on the above Staff report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat with several conditions intended to address the outstanding issues noted above and to further clarify the City's expectations in order for the developer to move forward with a final plat. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval,the applicant shall complete the following: a) the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney; b)the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat; c)the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an.application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the"Exception"parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona.subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight-foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room.for drainage and utilities adjacent to "Street A". 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green belt/buffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots I and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. 4) The eight-foot bituminous trail located within Outlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to "Street A" 5) The sidewalk along"Street A"must continue along this street until its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. 6) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Keats Avenue. 7) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. 8) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of a final plat and final construction plans. 9) Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi- family housing portion of the subdivision. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a— ACTION ITEM 11 10)The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue(CSAH 19)right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3, 2013. The required improvements shall include, but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten-foot bituminous trail through the median,turn lanes, and other improvements as required by the County. 11) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 12)The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically,the rearrangement of lots around the "Exception"parcel. 13)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. 14)The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 15)Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. 16)The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area(either public or private)within the multi-family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 17)The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to realign "Street A"and "Street.E"as one continuous through street with a design that accommodates the anticipated traffic volume. The street should be continuous,but remain curvilinear to mitigate traffic speeds. 19)No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat(155)may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a.connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south or Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)to the west. 19) Any future realignment of 5`b Street must be approved by the City as an amendment to the preliminary plat. 20)The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City PUBLIC ]HEARING ITEM 4a.—ACTION ITEM 12 Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat,and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 21)The preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. 22)The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate ail proposed improvements within the 5`b Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Damon Farber and Associates. 23)All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9,2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to,the following: a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas line, if necessary. b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas.Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water ponding. 24)The preliminary plat and preliminary plans shall only be approved upon the ordering of the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 by the City Council. If the City Council does not order this project,the applicant must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 25)The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi-family area, including but not limited to a conditional use permit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street,at the time a final plat is submitted for this area. 26)The applicant is encouraged to preserve or re-use as many trees as possible that are currently located on.the former golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. 27)The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Savona preliminary plat: That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a—ACTION ITEM 13 • That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential and Urban Medium Density Residential zoning districts. • That the Savona preliminary plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water,sediment and erosion control and other ordinances. • That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. • That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the City's engineering standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated July 9, 2013. RECCOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Savona preliminary plat with the 27 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Savona preliminary plat with the 27 conditions n f approval as drafted by Staff ATTACHMENTS: 1. Preliminary Landscape Plan Review Comments 2. Application Form(3) 3. Property Owner Contact Information 4. Woodland Evaluation Report 5. Review Comments: a. City Engineer b. Washington County c. Building Official. d. Valley Branch Watershed District b. 5"' Street Concept Plans(Damon Farber Associates) 7. Updated Preliminary Site Plan S. Preliminary Plat and Plans (23 sheets) ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Inixoduction....................................................................................... Planning Staff. - Report by Staff.................................................................................. Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission............................Chair&Commission Members - Open the Public Hearing............................................................I.................... Chair - Close the Public Hearing................................................................................. Chair - Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair&Commission Members - Action by the Commission.....................................Chair& Commission Members PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a-- ACTION ITEM Response Matrix Savona Preliminary Plat Pubic(fearing questions Lake Elmo Planning Department—7129113 The following issues and comments were raised during the public hearing and subsequent Planning Commission discussion concerning the Savona preliminary plat. Staff has identified the significant comments that were stated at the meeting and offers the following responses: Issue/Comment Staff Response Density of the proposed The City's initial work to determine appropriate densities within development the future sewer service areas (both for 1-94 and the Village) used the gross acreages of current parcels to determine the overall I number of REC units that was planned for development area. This allowed the City to prepare a plan that demonstrated compliance with the minimum REC unit thresholds that are established in the MOU between the City and Met Council without needing to study the development potential of each and every potential development site. Please note that these numbers therefore do not take into account how much area within each parcel could or could not be developed due to issues unique to each site (wetlands, open water, steep slopes, poor soils, heavily forested areas streets, trails,etc.). j For purposes of determining an allowed density for the Comprehensive Plan, the City decided to use a net density calculation,which removes the areas devoted to streets, parks, wetlands, open space, and other similar activities outside of the actual areas that are developed. This results in a somewhat higher density calculation than would otherwise be achieved using gross acreages because you have less land in which to accommodate the same number of units. The benefit of using this system is that a developer only receives "credit" for land that can be developed, and put more bluntly, they do not receive any rights to develop land that otherwise cannot be developed. Focusing on the Savona development,the City's rough density calculations using 2.5 units per acre as the lowest permitted density projected that there would be 230 units built an the area guided for low density development on this property. The applicant is proposing to plat 188 residential lots,which is below I the gross density amount. When translated to a net density calculation the density number increases to closer to three units i per acre, but this is primarily due to the large amounts of road right-of-way, open space, and storm water management areas that have been planned as part of the development. 1 Most importantly,the 3 units per acres is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan for the urban low density residential planning areas, which are guided for 2.5 to 4 units per acre net density. Use of density ranges in the In order to plan for growth within sewered development areas, Comprehensive Plan the City has chosen to differentiate between different residential land uses using a range of density values(expressed in units allowed per acre). It is a universally accepted practice in the planning field to deal with residential land uses in this manner since no two sites or development projects are going to be able to meet a specific density or unit count exactly. The ranges are intended to set a boundary between different types of residential uses while still providing enough detail to facilitate planning for transportation, utilities, parks, and other components of a comprehensive plan. In Lake Elmo's case,the Comprehensive Plan identifies residential development below 4 units an acre as low density, between 4.5 I and 7.5 units per acre as medium density, and anything above 7.5 i units per acre as high density, in the past, the City has only needed to establish a maximum density count for development in rural areas because there was no other land use category that allowed residential development. In order to achieve the REC unit counts as required under the M®U with the Met Council,the City must allow for densities that exceed those classified as low density residential. The City of Lake Elmo was successful in negotiating a modest reduction to the densities that would have otherwise been required by the Met Council prior to submitting the land use plan that was ultimately approved by the Met Council. The Met 1 Council's policies require that Cities connecting to the regional sanitary sewer system adopt residential densities with a minimum 4 of 3.5 units per acre. The City of Lake Elmo received approval for densities down to 2.5 units per acre at the low and of the range. More park space may be needed to The Planning Department will be presenting a map showing the serve the proposed development City's existing parks in the areas surrounding the Savona 1 subdivision at the meeting. Staff has recommended that the City I accept the park land dedications that have been included on the preliminary plat with the understanding that: 1) the City has 17 existing parks in addition to the regional park reserve that current provide recreation space for residents, 2)these parks all have maintenance and operational needs that must be met, 3) additional parks will be dedicated to the City as future projects f are brought forward, and 4) construction of the planned trail improvements will provide a more significant benefit to the iresidents of the area than additional park space. 2 The applicant will also be presenting a conceptual layout of the larger park area within Savona for consideration by the Planning Commission in order to better illustrate how this area could be used for park and recreation purposes. Park commission response Shane Weiss, who is the chair of the Lake Elmo Park Commission, has been asked to attend the Planning Commission meeting on July 291h to discuss the Park Commission's review of the Savona Plat and to review related park issues with the Planning Commission. Location of trails and pathways Staff has revised one of the conditions of approval to require that the trails be located closer to the Savona lots and further away from the adjacent properties. Park design The design for any park areas will need to be addressed by the City in the future. The Park Commission is presently working on a ( resident survey to determine the types of facilities and amenities that the City's residents would like to see in park areas. This work will be used to help guide future decisions concerning park improvement projects. Lennar was asked to prepare a conceptual layout of the larger park area within Savona using some of its existing developments as an example. These concepts are attached for consideration by the Planning Commission. 3 Use of park fees in lieu of land The City's Park Plan, which is a component of the Comprehensive dedication Plan, calls for a series of neighborhood parks along the 1-94 corridor and a larger community park/sports complex that would be built in the Village planning area. Since land dedication requirements alone would not be enough to acquire the needed land for a community park, any fees in lieu of land dedication will ultimately help pay for this community-wide amenity. The City's Park Plan also plans for a fairly extensive trail system, which could be constructed using funds from the park fund. On-street parking The City has developed a standard for new streets that has been reviewed by Staff, including the City Engineer, Public Works i Department, Fire Department, and Planning Department. The F streets proposed by the applicant are consistent with this standard, which has been designed to allow for parking on street i while still allowing sufficient maneuvering room for cars and trucks on the street. All of the proposed streets are very low volume residential streets and will not see a large amount of traffic other than the trips generated by the residents within the neighborhood. I E In general, Staff does not anticipate that there will be significant j demand for on-street parking within the Savona subdivision. In cases where a very heavy demand might be expected, a wider road width might be warranted. F E As with most development issues, there is always going to be a 3 compromise between various design elements for a site. In this lcase,the proposed street width of 28 feet is a reasonable l compromise that will keep the street somewhat narrow (which wilt help reduce speeds and calm traffic), while still allowing on- street parking in a manner that will not interfere with the ability to access the homes in this subdivision. € Play areas and the use of streets by The Savona subdivision includes sidewalks and/or trails children throughout the development to help safely move pedestrians from one point to another. The proposed parks within Outlot F and Outlot K are intended to provide space for children to play. The use of the driving lanes within streets by pedestrians is generally discouraged for safety reasons,although the "complete streets" movement encourages streets to be designed for all users of a transportation system. By including sidewalks and trails and keeping the width of the roadways at a reasonable amount, the applicant has recognized that the streets will be moving more than just cars and trucks. Developer performance The developer will be required to enter into an agreement with the City that guarantees the completion of all required improvements, including streets,trails, sidewalks, utilities, and landscaping. This agreement will be included as part of any application for final plat. The City has adopted a revised developer's agreement that is intended to avoid some of the non- compliance issues that have been observed in some previous subdivisions. Street "A" and "E" realignment At the direction of the Planning Commission, Staff has removed Condition#17, which would have required the applicant to realign two of the streets within the subdivision. Landscape plan review for One of the conditions of approval requires that the landscape fappropriate trees plan be reviewed by a professional forester or landscape architect. One of the reasons for this review will be to ensure that the proper trees are being selected for the plan. Single family and townhouse design The City has decided not to require design review for single family homes, which compromise the majority of the Savona Plat. As f currently drafted,the multi-family area will be subject to the City's design standards. This review will be conducted at the time of final plat review. Financial impacts of proposed The developer will be required to construct all improvements development within the subdivision that are required to serve the Savona Subdivision, including sewer, water, roads, and other required infrastructure. The applicant has also agree to participate in a regional assessment project that will assess all property owners in this area for the trunk sewer and water main extensions ! necessary to provide these service to the Savona site and all ! surrounding properties. j Pedestrian crossings The proposed construction plans will include appropriate pedestrian crosswalks where sidewalks and trails cross 5tn Street 4 and Keats Avenue. Townhouse outlots The applicant has indicated that the townhouses will be developed as a common interest community. This means that a homeowner's association would own all of the common property around the site structures. All structures will need to comply with the City's zoning regulations for yard setbacks, access, impervious coverage limits, and other requirements whether or not each home is platted on separate lot. Written comments Staff is anticipating that the developer of the property to the west of Savona (Amaris Homes) will be submitting comments opposed to the alignment of 5tn Street as depicted on the preliminary plat. In particular,this developer would like to see the road moved further to the south order to provide a more optimal alignment through the property currently owned by the Louis Damiani Trust. At this point in time,the property owner(Dale Properties) has not come to any agreement with Lennar or the developer to the west concerning a realignment of the roadway. Dale properties has sent the City an email (attached)stating their willingness to continue discussions with both parties to make the requested adjustment before the final plat is recorded. As originally drafted, one of the conditions of approval noted that a realignment of 5th Street must be approved as an amendment to the final plat. Staff has suggested revising this condition to specify that the realignment may be completed prior to submission of a final plat for this area in order to provide the three impacted parties with additional time to negotiate on this matter. Revision to conditions of approval Based on discussion from the previous Planning Commission meeting, Staff has made revision to the recommended conditions of approval. in order to facilitate the Commission's review,the proposed changes are noted in the document. 5 THE UI'Y OF LAKE ELMO Savona Preliminary Plat Review—Preliminary Landscape Plan Prepared by Lake Elmo Planning Staff 7-17-13 o Preliminary Landscape Plan Review o Landscaping requirements related to development activity are currently addressed in the City's Subdivision Ordinance, more specifically at Preliminary Plat. The Subdivision Ordinance requires two types of tree plantings: general and boulevard plantings. o The City's Subdivision Ordinance (§153.07.F.8.b) requires the developer to install trees at a minimum of 6 trees (deciduous: 1 inch caliper, coniferous: 3' in height) per acre within the subdivision. The site is 112.6 acres, requiring 676 trees, or 676 caliper inches of tree planting to meet the general requirement. o Regarding boulevard plantings, the City's Subdivision Ordinance (§153.07.F.8.c) requires tree plantings at a rate of 2 per 100 lineal feet and a minimum of 1.5 inch caliper in size.The proposed subdivision includes 31,329 linear feet of street. This translates to 627 boulevard trees, or 940 caliper inches as required boulevard plantings. o Per the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the total required plantings translate to 1,303 total trees, or 1,616 total caliper inches of tree plantings. o Per the Savona Preliminary Landscape Plan, the applicant is proposing to plant 1,228 total trees, translating to 3,070 total caliper inches. The applicant has noted that the following plant materials are included in the Preliminary Landscape Plan: 690 Overstory Trees, minimum 2.5 inch caliper ® 153 Ornamental Trees,minimum 1.5 inch caliper 385 Evergreen Trees, minimum 6' height o Staff has reviewed the Preliminary Landscape Plan and determined that it meets the intent of the ordinance due to the fact that the size of the plant materials greatly exceeds the minimum requirements or thresholds. Despite the fact that the proposed number of trees included in the plan is less than the number technically required per the City's Subdivision Ordinance,the Preliminary Landscape Plan greatly exceeds the minimum amount of 1,616 caliper inches required. By utilizing larger and more mature plant materials and trees than the City's Ordinance requires, the proposed plan would install 3,070 total caliper inches of trees, nearly twice the amount of the minimum threshold. o Staff has reviewed the boulevard plantings and determined that the Preliminary Landscape Plan meets the City's requirements for boulevard trees. o Regarding the proposed collector road that is included in the Preliminary Plat application, Staff has reviewed the location and type of plantings adjacent to the collector and found that the design should provide an effective buffer to the residential lots proposed in the development. o Staff recommends that the Final Landscape Plan be reviewed by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of Final Plat and Final Construction Plans. Savona Preliminary Plot-Review—Preliminary Landscape Pion Fee $ City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM f7- Comprehensive Plan Amendment ❑ Var4ance* (See below) '0�esidential Subdivision ,,� onin.g District Aanendinent Minor Subdivision Preliminary/Final Plat 0 01.- 10 Lots Text Amendment Lot Line Adjustment 0 11 -20Lots -.'k<21 Lots or More Flood Plain C.U.P. M Residential Subdivision D Excavating&Grading Permit Conditional Use Permit Sketch/Concept Plan � Appeal ❑PUD F-1 Conditional Use Permit(C.U.P.) M Site& Building Plan Review APPLICANT: 4—Is 1L1q. I le PLA-4L.1- /4 30;- (Name) Naiflnq/Address) (Zip) TELEPHONES: alz Ls fff6m—e) (Work) (Mobile) T a 1� FEE OWN ER: 5e-::-=- (Name) (Mailing Address) (ZIP) TELEPHONES: (Home) (Work) (Mobiia) (Fax) PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): /D-ro DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: sUL4- ' r e-10 4_,j 4"J *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code,the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship before avariance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as f6flows: In signing this application,I hereby arlmowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the amlization orocedures and hereby agree to Day all statements received froth the-City pe 11ining to additional/arml i cation expense. Sign r 2-v I Applicant e ot�Appflcailt 45042-651-777-5.116-Fzx651-777-9615 City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM Comprehensive Plan Amendment Var'ianoe*(See below) residential Subdivision Preliminarginal Ptat Zoning District Amendment ❑Minor Subdivision 0 01.-10 Lots Tod Amondment Lot Line Adiustmwit 0 11-20 Lots 1<21 Lots or More 0 nood Plain CU.P, Residential Subdivision D-Excavating&Grading Permit Conditional Use Permit Sketoh/Coocept Plan Appeal n PUD El Conditional Use Permit(C.U.P) F1 Siti&Building Plan Review suik-Goo APPLICAM: #Iw- L4 t�r-0, (Name) (Mailing/Addnm) (zip) TELEPHONES: WM_eT (Work) (Moblla) FEE OWNER: 5F,5- A-11-71A, 1-4-1-14 (Name) (MaIMSjAddress) (ZIP) TELEPHOi4ES: (Home) (Work) (Mobile) (Fax) PROPERTY-LOCATION(Address and Complete(Long)Legal Description)-.: DEMLED REASON FOR REQUEST-. 1-7 /C7e-- Qt-1t4%,--?tt4 9 t1tC;C7_4A-- r 49,Dr4 ijg& *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C.of the Lake,Elmo M11nicipaj Code,the Applicant must dzrnonstrateahardship before a variative can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows: In signing this application,I hereby acknowledge that I have read:and..fully understand the applitabit provisions of thp Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknoMedge the fee explarmtior,as outlined in the goptiga�Qn Rrocedums and Liweby.Mee to pay all fttergents received from the-Cityptrtaining to additionaliazolication wmemt. re of Applicarh r 7 Date 7,2 41e, City of Lake Eimo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM Ej—Comprehensive Flan Amendment []Var'tj=66*(Seebalow) 'E0Ce;WonfW Subdivision. -final Plat Preliminaryf Zoaiug District Amendment Ll Knor Subdivift 01-101,crts Text Amiendindnt E]LotUnokdjustmml C I!-ZOLots 21 Lots or More Flood Plain C.U,?. Residevfial Subdivision E3 Excavating&Gradlj�gPermft Conditional Use pew- '* Sketch/Concept Plan E3 Appeal ?UD Q.Conditional Use Permit(C.U-X.) El Siti&-Baif ding PJan Review APPOCANT, IJS llf*& nk ay M/l/A Z40 A.4,, /lp'3,9 6 A J. /P% T'W my if TELEPHONES: k T4644; Y 612- 76 I've- �:EE OWNER. 5F-c- (Namey (MAffi�g Mdrem (Zp) TELEPHORM: (Haosel (Work) (Fax) PROPF-RTY LOCATION-(Address and Complete(Long):Legat DescripVon),. x. 4, DF-WLED REASON FOR REQUEST: r A r A Alm, 4— .' k *VARJANGEREQUESTS. As-outlined ingectiGii,2.01.060c,.bf-the Lake 81ino:Municipal Code,the Ap demonstrate abudshipb&fureavatianae can lie granted. TliahardiliT.prpiatedtathis application isaafollows: tnsL--,t=` g this applicaeionj hereby acknowledge thal have tead-u-nd fully understand-tbe;applicable provisions of t1m Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances mid currb&.adm1Disuffhve procedures. �it-lieracknowledotlig fee ea olwation as oufling,d in Lie aim[Leadorf procedures and.liereby asme to a. all statements modlifed froi i e-Ci . ruin to I !Y ggrw� g- -additiouakvni'leation exDense. Ant •33JLIcm'a hvemp'Nodh•i&,ABI. r2%651-77-771961-5 v Existing Property Owners: PID 4 3402921410004 Frandsm Bad & frust calo Dr, and Campa-qy, Inc, 5-4t8i St.. Croix Trail, sto... 200 N01-fil Brall ch, W 5 5)05 6 Attm Rm Eitz PID9's 3402921340003, 3402921.340001, 3462911-1310001, 3402921420001 Dale Propeilics LLC 6007 Cufligyan Way Mitmetonka, NfN ��-- 345 A-Un., Almi J. Dale 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952.937-5922 Westwood TOLL FREE 888-937-5150 www.westwoodps.com MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 2015 Re: Lake Elmo Property NN oodland Evaluation. Report File: 20121161.00 To: Lennar 16305 36th Ave. N., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 From: Kelly Kunst PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION At the request of Lennar, Westwood Professional Services (Westwood) completed a woodland evaluation of the Lake Elmo Property(Site)which is located in the S %2 of Section 34, T29N, R21 W, City of Lake Elmo, Washington county, Minnesota (Exhibit 1). The Site was comprised of approximately 112.5 acres of land located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 94 and Keats Avenue North(CSAH 19). The Site contains all or portions of parcel numbers 34.029.2I.41.0004, 34.029.21.42.0001, 34.029.21.34.0001, 34.029.21.34.0003, and 34.029.21.31.0001. The Site was primarily agricultural land which made up approximately 70 acres on the west part of the Site. The eastern 40 acres contains a former golf driving range. Within cropped areas are four uncropped pockets vegetated with mature trees. Approximately seven acres of open meadow is located in the south-central part of the Site. Other concentrations of trees included a wooded fencerow, landscape plantings and two mature white pine stands located on the driving range. The Site was assessed on March 6, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to provide sufficient information to assist in the prioritization of significant trees on the Site to be considered in development planning. Exhibit 2 provides an aerial photograph of existing conditions on the Site and the location of features discussed in this report. WOODLAND EVALUATION SUMMARY There are no high-quality, natural woodlands on the Lake Elmo Site. As indicated, the trees that are present consist of landscape plantings and two stands of mature white pine on the driving range portion of the property, and remnant trees on uncropped portions of the west part of the Site. Land and Energy DFVROPMENT CONSULTANTS Lake Elmo Property Woodland Evaluation Report March 8,2013 Page 2 The primary landscape trees on the east part of the Site consist of Norway spruce(Picea abies) Colorado spruce(Picea pungens) and white pine (Pinus strobus). These species make up all of the linear plantings that can be seen in the aerial photograph on the driving range. These trees generally range from 10 to 25 feet in height with a diameter breast height (dbh)between 4 to 8 inches. There are two areas in the north-central and southwest corner of the driving range where there are stands of mature white pine approximately 40 to 50-feet in height with dbh's between 12 to 20 inches. Scattered saplings of honey locust and box elder were also observed in this part of the Site. The main fencerow, oriented north to south through the center of the cropped part of the Site, was comprised primarily of mature red and bur oak (Quercus rubra and Q. macrocarpa) and included pockets of box elder(Acer negundo). The red and bur oaks were generally greater than 20 inches dbh. Red and bur oak trees that were large(> 14"dbh), structurally sound,had good form, and were relatively disease free were noted and surveyed in the field. The canopy of the uncropped areas in the agricultural field was made up entirely of box eider with the exception of the westernmost area which also contained some red and bur oak. Other observed tree species included scattered eastern red cedar(Juniperus virginiana) in the meadow areas in the west part of the Site, and some mature red pine in the southwest part of the driving range. SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT There are no natural, high-quality woodland areas on the Lake Elmo Site. Existing woodland consists of landscape plantings and small remnants of native oaks and pines. What exists on the site could be utilized as screens between different portions of the development, or as a structural basis for development of parks or other natural features in the development. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have with regard to the woodland evaluation. You may reach me by phone at (952) 906-7421 or by email at kelly.kunst@,%restwoodps.com.. Sincerely, 4P Kelly Kunst Environmental Scientist Attachments Exhibits II-:L, T., arse and Energy [>E�„-, ��r✓.n+T cot�:s:,;r��r�. rip F WIF V R ! 4"1 .• h.: t'F'+'r C1 >•r� "•'r�,',d ,. :' . 'J _ I („";�r�'t" •�:.r'- —■■ 17 N CII T' �jx.tiJ 1'' ,•+..!w-••!, '4+^•-^ia �- .IAffw -1r'k r � 161 I '. (g N egbr k10}/�E7 `S�4 ` 4�t� 1;. y 1 1 r r ! r ti''� .rr 14th�St:N _ ;T=--: '..,..- r , ! f �Nr --;1• ,. ,fS Ir CI 5�+� xS 1 r x ✓,' --'. -Ave w F- uc �� '� � LL '4Y-:- J r Eti '1 r''�'." r f.A.f.-.�{es�a� Pa•1s - t�:'�i� 9�„^r•ts „r..,�' ..4 '}_ � ,..._...�' �..t� �—,.., p,'��{ .7., --J �✓ N anb oua�3 a>�e'� I , . -- er#rrTr JpAeno r�eBk}}off Vic, 7;� Y yi 3yyt{ _ „� - � I qJ" er ,y✓.stir:� ' { 1 :r `3 Z 3r '..4. ,,yn [�ygg7 `9 ,� +EIS 1WA � Tr Jr + .,+,.-r�.•r�. C ~ �'rJ!'�1 !. _ ��SW."'� - ~"•a _ 4' " !3/ iy. _ 5 +...yam~1' 1 r }1�. [ .. ` 'w.; - �'?.:/„✓' .ti!r �!9 Strr Y Eh� n. '''�v p*;% �;.�3 Y'�'3ti r•-,'C-�'., l.• ,•-`•A #., ' 10titJStr (:t Nike .. .'���t+...'Y•f r.-.r .'. �. rti. M1I ka KlL�" (o. `� r E fir_f 7�. _� ,✓w yr �`s. •aul.�1.. s C r•._ -_f<M rT W ,q`' (� ��--�ytt J � 1te f 'rr�.•-,��:t ' Jr ,. .;y a 1}'-• „+. � � iLa' � r " 'Sz= ktit [tiY �I' '`(t� ( f� ri- "l5•; ljr' t '` �' I 1 Z., �I k q}. p.4.p-yr +' a �., �!� •�'�;.�r,s. 8 '' r 4a ','t•^ i' r` '.:P.tt y.y'di`c=g.� f '� .? ,� '0.� �,;�� •�-:-,�fj�Jy�' .' ��'�n��""•,.....„r t" �- CF r t m. ...t., -z • `5 j rr. J. a r_rF�-a" .-.e;�•� �+c•� Gier r- f� '- tip. �. � jam..•, .i T3 r N a^a s}eaz rhr, aQ tingpooM 1�fun41PIUO �a f f�j�`rP '•_ +'�"J"•�'.- '°r v'k�'�-� ��,��� �`.!� '�' y �d �M��>r 'r .:r' :l+-1�-ti,} � •'rti'+ I f�. `,: -r. ",-..., ,.F ✓ r�, �,{(1n1 - :) .... f [! ,.�,..� _..� ��F..;s;,�,x f>-.r- .� lcy�•ff _�s{Ir fr +�•�°n' "� �'�; ! � � f C U? ' I +'�.°' t __„_ �•-`• 9+�. �r'.�1►��.r�'.. 4. �;'� �J.:-. 3 t .•+„ /"'�I .''vf'j'1! �'•.ti...l"'.„�1'� �yt J � 5;�.. J, t, _ r+ �p�J r�t�,w t L+'�jr-F y�'r{:�1� .'1i f'j •'^ � '.g �s'J. �II++.ill' ...,-- {�r ��'�•.,,,ti, ` 1 UMO aAj x• ® v �.2l� r•( '� C'c' r•;'�•X7 tr !j eJ_ f,.r r--`, -, + •b 1l '-'' i= p "!"'^ ✓..�:'rr-y -721 's���'_�,— '7'2S ,��� r fib.. ' "a' Gtl`'�5 � I .✓• ��=-�'� � r� lt,r, �Gp_ •f }� tt-✓ - - . ,r I{k �9� �' i QQ y i'` t`c' •i c.✓� - -4r: {+.;.' r 'tr +1.=w. CD - ! - :/r1 .'qp �jfy tZ 'it 17S' •t ti. r t. { S ��1 0 jlrlcj ..,r I,R"'v.�r'%J �,'15.f' r'' 1.S fr3tr-.� 1 .-'• �� it a„y',r'�� �� ✓ ��.. r �r Q rkside,or f, .'°•r+n. -d r -7 ,�r::4t- ..}s � } -' 1 V'"rw � Ff f �- iti....+-•.". ,/ '- ., 7 h � i k ...{....._._.. k ,� ��.Jam•- \^• �"'_. t '-pA� A..�r '"� �.: ter° .+ _, � S�`;,, r; •. �. ;;rr_'y_r' rl �Fy. r �j^ �]., 4 Ca 7 ='? _ 'F ti r+ �„r { � �� ��• ; a, r n'_"'`" r i i f•-,"��`+'Lrr i l F '""K141�``y�1�. '^•{ '� �• rr ,r' �Y �-";`"-' -'� � t tgrlk J 1 tic9p fir" '4"a ,r.�jrz• �,r- -'� i'v.'' J r'��`';�: r�r,{• e i M �Ory 3i� 1� '`_ f"yf%` ( i r �d�+"811r Y�- i E 4' fdr'` ,Q� r��#+ '. �" �.,1Q•.&tlOU1J61i0�1 - £ N a7'`po&4nr4� C9 n; +�,'� cr w -•. 4 __ �. 4 "a !4 I d -f 4 �,F- .. �„ ,ram� a a� u"i W "'� ''Z sib. j j.. •x•-4, a{� ,... .�_........; k{��•( r 10� C°t�f EP a d f„,11' 1! � R;�s 3a ( ss,fi� J. .g r { m m�{ e � c' � 1.tiw-,•.. r-' -� � .r-� �` � � E rti!�f �'' � � ' J -�'� - v R q F ZI e$ � a 2 d 54�.5 � �- �[O�d w I (� r• � o $"°° i , .� .at9C'j•.. '�It'a4 r 4.f a .} ,�r�' B{IlCS{Pf� e � �-•Rr S d J'ii �. � �_�*}?+,"j e +, � `'� i� ?l( �f j._°O 31.1!�� iZ1 � F"j� ! h r �!k'3 Au'� • � `_r C N ' I 7 !•.`far {. ! ry`• ,' '�{,:. '?a W" m " L-a4-1-1 ��.,•� .r• ��,a'«-v?Sd =art--,S- Y:i'*- r�+" aC7i Y. 747 S it 41 '.�� sy �y�, L,'� • �a� m,�la k.. tw 9A 1 j- i i '�:,.Kw,-.1� :a�.;y�:s '_ _ agsnlS4F ?"�""� �t -5..'ix• �' i of�v.� },..,• v ` x All t f q, iz f t - si , r w o- �r MEMORANDUM ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Geheren, P.E. 651.300.4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264 Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267 Date: July 9, 2013 Chad Isakson,P.E. 651.300.4295 To: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Re: Savona Cc: Nick Johnson, City Planner Preliminary Plat Review Ryan Stemspksi, P.E.,Assistant City Engineer From: Jack Griffin, P.E., City Engineer An engineering review has been completed for the Savona development by Lennar Corporation. A Preliminary Plan submittal was received on June 26, 2013. The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc.: ® Preliminary Plans dated March 28, 2013;with revision date June 14, 2013. a Preliminary Storm Water Runoff Narrative, dated May 10, 2013. STATUS/FINDINGS: The fallowing comments summarize the proposed infrastructure plans, and identify specific design elements that must be addressed to facilitate approval of the preliminary plat. Additional engineering recommendations have also been provided to identify issues that must be addressed or amended as part of the final plat and/or final construction plans. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND COMMENTS I. The applicant has requested an exception to the city standards to allow for a 6.5% sidewalk grade along Streets E and F. The maximum allowable grade along residential streets is 8%. However, the maximum allowable street grade with a sidewalk is 6.0%. Engineering recommends approval of this exception. 2. No additional design exceptions have been noted and requested in writing by the applicant. Therefore all infrastructure systems will be reviewed and accepted by the city upon meeting city design standards. 3. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas, if necessary. 4. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water ponding. STREETS AND TRANSPORATION 1. Access: The primary access to the site is from CSAH 19 (Keats Avenue). The location of the access point is acceptable to the County (per letter dated July 3, 2013) and is consistent with the city's plans for a future Collector Road (5th Street). 2. The applicant's preliminary plat submittal should include a commitment by the applicant to provide the CSAH 19 improvements recommended by the County. These improvements should be part of the applicant's proposal. 3. Secondary access has not been addressed by the proposal. The applicant believes that secondary access will occur through the platting of surrounding developments (Hammes Estates to the north, Montgomery PAGE 1 of 4 properties to the west, or Dale Properties to the south). Because the platting of future developments is outside of the control of the applicant, a secondary access plan (contingency plan) should be included as part of this proposal. The development phasing should be limited to allow up to 170 homes (west to Street G) until secondary access is made available acceptable to the city. 4. Collector Road: The dedication of right-of-way (R/W) and the construction of a Collector Roadway (5th Street), as identified in the city's Comprehensive Plan, is a critical transportation element necessary to support this development. S. The proposal indicates the dedication of 120 feet of R/W as requested by the city to provide for a Parkway design meeting state aid street design requirements for lane widths, clear zones, and curb reaction distances. This dedication should remain a part of this development application. 6. Engineering is recommending that additional R/W be provided at 5th Street and the future street intersection to Hudson Boulevard (through Dale Properties) to accommodate a future roundabout intersection. 7. The design and construction of 5th Street will be needed to support this development and other development in the 194 Corridor.The city is requesting a Parkway design with center turn lanes, right turn lanes, and a center median, The proposal must be revised to incorporate the design elements outlined in the city's theming plan, including street lighting. 8. The design of 5th Street, and its adjacent sidewalks and trails, must meet Municipal State Aid design standards for urban streets (8820,9936) for ADT> 10,000 and over 45 mph. No state aid variances can be allowed. 9. Access spacing along 5th Street is allowed at 1/8 mile intervals for non-continuous local streets, at% mile intervals for continuous local streets and collector streets, and at % mile intervals for streets with higher classification. Access spacing proposed along 5th Street is acceptable to the city. 10. Internal Street network: The internal streets are shown consistent with city standards for right-of-way and width, including cul-de-sacs. 11. Two street extensions are provided for continuation to the north consistent with Hammes Estates concept plans. 12. The plat also indicates two street extensions to the west, which is not consistent with the concept plans for the westerly adjacent property. Agreement of future street extensions to the west must be achieved and the preliminary plat revised accordingly, if necessary. 13. Engineering anticipates a higher than normal residential traffic volume passing through the Savona development as residential properties in Hammes Estates seek to gain access to 5th Street and the commercial properties to be developed south of 5th Street. Engineering strongly recommends that Street A and Street E be aligned as one continuous through street with a design that accommodates this traffic volume.The street should be continuous, but remain curvilinear to mitigate traffic speeds. 14. Sidewalks and Trail:Sidewalks are shown along one side of each street serving the single family homes. A sidewalk is also shown along one side of Street i, serving the multi-family homes. Street I should require a sidewalk on each side of the street. 15. The applicant has provided a 6-foot wide sidewalk along the south side of 5th Street and an off-road 10- foot separated shared use trail along the north side of 5th Street. This is consistent with the city's desire to create a regional trail connection from Manning to 6nwood. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. The proposed development resides within both the Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD) and the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD), The stormwater management plan will therefore need to be compliant with the requirements of both watershed districts, as applicable, as well as the Lake Elmo storm water management ordinance. It is the applicant's responsibility to creatively plan for adequate storm water ponding and infiltration facilities. 2. The storm water facilities have been located in Outlots dedicated to the city for maintenance purposes. As the design progresses, all 100-year high water levels (HWL) and HWL overflows must remain within a city Outlot. PAGE 2 of 4 3. Maintenance access roads have been provided for the storm water facilities and included in Outlots. 4. All Rear lot drainage swales and catch basins must indicate 100-year HWL and be protected by drainage easements. 5. Engineering continues to have concerns regarding the proposed Storm Water Management Plan. It is anticipated that revisions will be required as part of the final plat and construction plan review process that may require the applicant to potentially alter lot lines, and/or alter easement and Outlot boundaries. It will be the applicant's responsibility to amend the storm water management system to meet the various agency approvals and to amend the plat as needed to accomplish these approvals. Engineering has previously requested the consolidation of ponding and infiltration facilities to address some of the following concerns: a. Infiltration basin 1 has a bottom elevation that is lower than the NWL of Pond 1. b. Infiltration basin and Pond 2 have a HWL that appears to saturate the road subbase of 5th Street. Greater horizontal and/or vertical separation may be required. c. Pond 3 is too small, of odd shape and receives only a 3.0 acre drainage shed. It is likely that this pond will not perform as intended. d. Pond 5 is too small and receives only a 5.3 acre drainage shed. It is likely that this pond will not perform as intended. e. Pond 6 has a HWL that may saturate the road subbase of 5th Street. Greater horizontal and/or vertical separation may be required. SITE UTILITIES 1. As part of the final plat process, staff will continue to review for adequate utility easements for all sanitary sewer, watermain and storm sewer piping. Easement widths must be labeled for each pipe and shown on the utility plans. Easement widths must be a minimum of 30 feet, Wider easements may be required for deep pipes to meet OSHA excavation requirements. 2. Additional utility corridor widths may be required within the multi-family private driveway areas to allow for OSAH complaint maintenance access by the city. Areas to be adjusted include SW corner of Block 29, south end of Block 32, north end of Block 33, and storm sewer/retaining wall separation along the east side of Block 28. Sanitary sewer: 1. Municipal sanitary sewer is available along Hudson Blvd, in the Eagle Point Business Park. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal sanitary sewer to the development site at developer's cost. 2. The applicant has initiated a 429 Public Improvement project to extend sanitary sewer from the Eagle Point Business Park to the intersection of CSAH 19 and 5th Street (including a lift station and forcemain). If this improvement is ordered by the City Council, this project will provide sewer service to the development consistent with the city comprehensive plan. The preliminary plat must be contingent upon the completion of this project. 3. The applicant must provide any necessary easements, at no cost to the city, to allow the 429 Public Improvement project to be constructed. 4. The applicant's proposal provides for an internal network of sanitary sewer piping that is consistent with city design standards and allows for phasing of the sewer system along with the phasing of the development. The detailed design of the sanitary sewer facilities may be addressed through the final plat process. Waterrnain: 1. Municipal water supply is available along Hudson Blvd. in the Eagle Point Business Park. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal water supply to the development site at developer's cost. 2. The applicant has initiated a 429 Public Improvement project to extend municipal water service from the Eagle Point Business Park to the intersection of CSAH 19 and 5th Street. If this improvement is ordered by PAGE 3 of 4 the City Council, this project will provide water service to the development consistent with the city comprehensive plan.The preliminary plat must be contingent upon the completion of this project. 3. The applicant must provide any necessary easements, at no cost to the city, to allow the 429 Public Improvement project to be constructed. 4. As the development is constructed, the city may request some portions of the watermain to be oversized to 12-inch diameter pipe. The city's practice has been to reimburse the developer for oversize costs for pipe sizes over 8-inch diameter. S. The applicant's proposal provides for an internal watermain network that is consistent with city design standards and allows for phasing of the watermain along with the phasing of the development. The detailed design of the watermain facilities may be addressed through the final plat process. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL 1. The retaining wall located along the west side of Block 28 should remain on Outlot K, remaining private property owned by the HOA. 2. A more defined swale should be considered along the west side of Block 20 to protect against flooding. 3. The grading plan should be revised to better define the swale termination at the southeast corner of Block 28.A significant swale appears to terminate at the retaining wall. 4. Temporary drainage and erosion control provisions must be provided to capture the channelized flow from Street A and Block 2 as they discharge off site to the westerly property. SPECIFIC ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS: The following issues should be addressed as part of the final plat process.These issues should be addressed in a point by point response letter to expedite city review. 1. Final Construction Plans and Specifications for improvements on the County Road system must be reviewed by Washington County. Comments received from the County shalt be incorporated into Final Construction Plans for review by the city. 2. A State Aid plan design set will be required to facilitate the design review of the construction plans. 3. A geometrics plan will be required for 5th Street. Annotations alone, as provided in the preliminary plat, are not sufficient. 4. Cross Sections will be required as part of the construction plans for any portions of street and trail improvements that abut existing conditions (along the development edges). This includes CSAH 19 turn lanes. S. Draintile will be required as part of the street design per the city standards. 6. Sanitary sewer up to 20-feet in depth can be SDR 35. A 0.10 foot drop is required across all sanitary sewer manholes. 7, A minimum 2%slope is required for all rear yard slopes. 8. Storm sewer design calculations must be provided as part of the final plat process. 9. Plan standard details shall retain the Lake Elmo title block. Any changes proposed in the standard details must be clearly identified in a "change request" letter by the developer's engineer. 10. The retaining wall west of Block 28 must be designed and certified by a Professional Engineer registered in the State of Minnesota.Certified plans must be submitted to the city as part of the final plat. 11. Landscape details must be the City of Lake Elmo standard details and plan notes. 12. The grading plan should be revised in the area of Outlot G where the drainage swale in Block 12 is directed to the back property of Lots 1 and 2, Block 14.Additional berm protection should be considered. 13. The grading plan should be revised in the area of Outlot A where the drainage swale in Block 1 is directed to the back property of Lots 1 and 2, Block 10. Additional berm protection should be considered. PAGE 4 of 4 Wa�Wngton Public Works Department Donald J.Theisen,P,E, Director Oomoftftwov uotmt VA/ I Wayne H. Sandberg,P.E. Deputy DirectortCounty Engineer July 3, 2013 Kyle Klatt Community Development Director City of Lake Elmo 3600 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE: Washington County comments on the preliminary plans and plat for the Savona Residential Development. City of Lake Elmo Dear Mr. Klatt: Thank you for providing the county with the preliminary plat and plans of the Savona Residential subdivision in Section 34, Township 27, Range 21, City of Lake Elmo The project will consist of 189 single family lots and 122 multi-family residential lots. Based on review of the plans, we offer the following comments and recommendations to consider as you process this subdivision application through the City of Lake Elmo: • The proposed access point on CSAH 19 is acceptable to the County. ® A right-of way permit will be required for any work in the CSAH 19 right-of way as it relates to the development, A State Aid plan set is required with the application and include any grading, installation of culverts, installation of water and sewer services, left and right turn lanes on CSAH 19, pedestrian crossings, parallel trail grading and development, if required, paving and striping, center median crossing removals, new center median crossings, signage and any landscaping and other improvements within county right-of-way. • Since the proposed project will generate additional traffic on CSAH 19/Keats Avenue, functionally classified as an "A" Minor Arterial Roadway, improvements to CSAH 19/Keats Avenue will need to be provided for access to the collector roadway. These improvements include left and right turn lanes on the southbound lane and a left turn lane on the northbound lane on CSAH 19. There should also be a new median crossing from the southbound lane to the northbound lane on CSAH 19 at the new collector street location. ® The proposed project will generate pedestrian/bicycle traffic on CSAH 19/Keats Avenue which is identified in the Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2030 as the Central Greenway Regional Trail. Pedestrians from the future development will need to access the existing off road trail on the east side of CSAH 19/Keats Avenue, therefore a crossing on the north side of the new intersection will need to be designed and constructed to provide this connection. 41 Although it is not in the City of Lake Elmo 2030 Comprehensive Trail Plan, an off road parallel trail on the west side of CSAH 19/Keats Avenue should be considered by the city as the development/subdivision proceeds through the city review process. This trail will link directly to the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve to the north and the City of Woodbury to the south. 11660 Myeron Road north, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 651-430-4300 . Fax. 651-430.4350 < 1TY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mn.us Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Savona Subdivision July 3, 2013 ® Removal of the existing medians on CSAH 19/Keats Avenue shall be included in the plans, • A signage plan for CSAH 19/Keats Avenue shall be prepared as it relates to the traffic improvements. • The developer or the city must submit the drainage report and calculations to our office for review of any downstream impacts to the county drainage system.Along with the drainage calculations,we wilt request written conclusions that the volume and rate of stormwater run-off into the county right-of way will not increase as part of the project. • Access control must be dedicated to Washington County along the CSAH 19fKeats Avenue frontage, except for the opening corresponding to the City's right of way for the collector roadway. • Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCKs Noise Area Classification (NAC)where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. County policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The deveioper should assess the noise situation and take any action outside of County right of way deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions or comments to the responses on the Savona EAW, please contact me at Ann.pung-terwedo&o.washington.mn.us. k Tw�& Tetwed ' Senior Planner C: Carol Hanson, Office Specialist RIPIal ReviowslUy of Lake ElmofSavona7-3-203 Nick Johnson From: Rick Chase Sena: Monday, July 08, 2013 8:03 AM To: Kyle Klatt Cc: Nick Johnson Subject: Lennart Preliminary Plans Good morning, Comments on the plan are: 1. Do we want to post a Construction entrance? 2. Do we need a concrete wash-out area? 3. Can curb boxes be placed outside of driveway areas? This is in case they are repaired in the future and need to be excavated; the cost will be easier to manage the repairs. 4. Do we want to include a city standard for the water service? (Template) . 5. Is there information on what type of multi unit dwellings will be built? 3ust some thoughts, let me know if there is anything I can assist with. Rick Chase, Building official City of Lake Elmo rchase(@lakeelmo.org (w) 651-747-3910 (f) 651-777-9615 1 Kyle Blatt From: John P. Hanson [JHanson@barr.com] Sent: Friday, July 05, 2013 10:47 AM To: Kyle Klatt Subject: Savona and Ryland Homes (Landucci Property) Hi Kyle, Thanks for forwarding the information regarding the proposed comp plan amendment for the Ryland Homes project and the preliminary plan for the Savona residential subdivision. Both project ultimately will require permits from the Valley Branch Watershed District. When complete permit applications are submitted, they'll be reviewed to ensure conformance to the VBWD rules and regulations. While the current request for the Ryland Homes project is for a zoning change, the concept drawing attached likely will not conform to the VBWD rules and regulations because it shows ponds. VBWD requires stormwater volume control, which is typically accomplished by bioretention basins(basins which drain dry within 48 hours). The developer should also be aware that the site drains to 1-94 and the nutrient-impaired St. Croix River. Therefore, in addition to the VBWD requirements, phosphorus load reductions could be required to conform to the TIVIDL(total maximum daily load). VBWD previously submitted comments on the Savona EAW. Thank you, John John P. Hanson, PE Valley Branch Watershed District Engineer Barr Engineering Company 1 4700 W. 77th St. I Edina, MN 55435 Phone: 952.832.2622 j Cell: 612.590.1785 ihanson@barr.com ( www.borr,corn I www.ybwd.orcq 1 z � Z J M LL Lc 7 Lu Z - . >... p w ' Ln i— z AR Lfl 14 ' . CL � z ` � I ' of w .. r �V) w uj Uj ... I ui uws ;-: w w O w o .:.:,. LL ��F t w c!, N w L r F k F. Lj ry LLI R w f�- LU Wes.: tAM LU o V w LJ.! WJ � Z m i* • t. at /„1 W k N¢o.' ' ran 1 r+`: urr..i pEf�f• ��s THE CITY OFF LA Y E ELMO City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 22, 2013 Chairman Williams called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:01 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Williams, Haggard, Larson, Morreale, Dodson and Kreimer; COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Reeves and Dorschner; and STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Klatt, City Planner Johnson and City Administrator Zuleger. Approve Agenda: The Planning Commission accepted the agenda as presented. Approve Minutes:June 24, 2013 M/S/P: Kreimer/Dodson, move to accept the minutes of June 24, 2013 as amended to include mention that the Hammes Estates Sketch Plan lacks a neighborhood park, Vote: 4-0, Motion Carried, with Haggard not voting. Public Hearing:Savona Preliminary Plat—Lennar Homes Klatt began the Staff presentation by explaining the Planning Commission's role in reviewing preliminary plat applications. He noted that plat applications are subject to the City's Subdivision Ordinance,wherein the rules of land subdivision are established. These ordinances include provisions related to grading, streets, utilities, storm water management and other considerations related to establishing new subdivisions or other development. Klatt moved on to present a general overview of the Preliminary Plat application submitted by US Homes Corporation (Lennar Homes). The subdivision is located on 112 acres and includes 310 residential units. He then provided a location map that highlighted all the parcels of land that are included in the application. He also described the existing land uses that surround the proposed subdivision. Regarding utilities, Klatt noted that the applicant and other landowners in the area have submitted a petition to extend sanitary sewer and water to the proposed development site west of Keats Avenue North (CSAH 19). This project would extend utilities throughout the Stage 1 development area identified in the Comprehensive Plan, making Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 2 connection to sanitary sewer and water possible for other parcels in the area. The project also includes a lift station. Klatt noted that the parcels included in the application are currently zoned Rural Development Transitional (RT). As far as the history is concerned, the Planning Commission reviewed a Sketch Plan on December 10, 2012. In addition, the City Council approved the Environmental Assessment Worksheet required for the project on July 2, 2013. Regarding the City's Comprehensive Plan, Klatt explained how the proposal relates to the City's Planned Land Use Map. The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use, density and expected number of residential units for the area. Klatt noted that the proposal shifts the minor collector road in the 1-94 Corridor to the south. This change enlarges the area guided for Low Density Residential, as the collector road serves as the boundary in the City's Comprehensive Plan. Moving on, Klatt described how the proposed subdivision compares to the City's zoning districts. He highlighted the basic details of the proposed residential lots that will be included in the subdivision. Getting to the plat application itself, Klatt presented the basics of the proposal. In addition, he gave an overview regarding the Staff Report. Regarding action, Klatt noted that Staff has identified 27 conditions of approval. The largest of these included the greenbelt buffer of 100 feet, there needs to be adequate room for a 30 foot trail set back to the exception lot, the developer is responsible to install new median and a trail connection across Keats to the East and the full 10% park dedication. There were also a number of Engineer conditions that including a secondary access and realignment of the street. These conditions would be required to be resolved in advance of Final Plat approval. Klatt noted that the developer has requested to modify conditions 17, 18, and 24. Staff recommends that language can be added to condition #18 to allow secondary access to the north. In addition, Staff is comfortable with the language proposed for condition #24 related to the 429 public improvement project. Klatt did note some base findings for the Planning Commission. In addition, Klatt noted that Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend the preliminary plat application for approval to the City Council with 27 conditions of approval. Morreale noted that he is confused regarding the density in the proposal. He felt that the proposal should adhere to the low end of the allowed density range, which is 2.5 units per net acre. Klatt explained that the comprehensive plan approved a range of density that was 2.5 to 4 and was not specific to numbers. Klatt also stated that it should be noted that this proposal is described in net density terms, which includes the park and open areas as well. Lake Eli-no Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 3 Haggard asked about the requirements of parkland dedication vs. open space. Klatt noted that the Comprehensive Plan does not require open space, but it is encouraged. The Subdivision Ordinance requires parkland dedication at time of subdivision (10% in this case). Haggard also asked what the fee in lieu of parkland dedication would be. Klatt noted that it would be the equal market value of 4.6 acres. He did not venture what that would equate to. Williams asked what the determination of the Park Commission was regarding the Savona concept for parkland. Klatt noted that Staff did locate the minutes for that meeting. There was no formal motion from the Park Commission regarding the Savona Concept. Williams also asked about acreage of Reid Park. Klatt stated that Reid Park is 2.6 acres with parking, 1.9 acres without. Larson asked about the park structures included in the tot lot. He would like to see seating and shade for people to watch their children. Morreale asked why the City would accept fee in lieu of land dedication when there is a need for more parkland. Klatt noted that the Parks Commission has expressed concern about the City's ability to maintain additional parkland when there is a need for maintenance for the City's existing facilities. Staff felt that this development was so close to the Park Preserve that people in this development would probably use those facilities in addition to City parkland. Kreimer asked if the applicant has to present the types of homes they intend to build, including information about pricing and architectural style. Klatt noted that this type of information is typically not reviewed in a plat. Dodson asked about the budgetary/financial implications of the new development proposal. Administrator Zuleger noted that sewer and water extensions costs come from enterprise funds, and the tax revenue from the new homes will pay for additional public safety considerations, such as sheriff deputies and fire protection. Haggard asked about the pedestrian crossings of 5th Street. Klatt noted that with any improvement there would be a crosswalk, but no controlled intersection. Administrator Zuleger also noted that there is a 10' bituminous trail on the north side of 51h Street and 6' sidewalk on the south side of 5th Street. These facilities will aid pedestrian circulation on 5th Street. Haggard asked about the architectural design of the townhome area. Klatt noted that the applicant has not submitted any additional information and that it is not required until the final plat. Williams noted that there is only so much level of detail that the City can evaluate the proposal on at Preliminary Plat, Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 4 Morreale asked if the City is allowed to make the developer lower the density of the proposal to 2.5 units per acre. Klatt noted that the Planning Commission would have to make findings that support why the request does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. Klatt noted that the proposed density currently does comply with the requirements of the Comprehensive Plan. If the City wanted to stick to the 2.5 units per acre density requirement, the Comprehensive Plan would need to be amended to reflect this requirement. Williams asked about Outlot K. Klatt noted that the area includes all the common areas of the townhome portion of the development. Johnson noted that Outlot K is private and would be part of the Homeowners Assoc. for the townhomes. This is consistent with a common interest community and the roads in Outlot K are private. The townhome area will also require a CUP for the current configuration. Williams asked about the wording of Condition#17, 18, and 24 per the applicant's request. Klatt shared the requested language of Condition#17 would be to work with the engineer to find the best solution for the road alignment, 18 would be that there be a secondary access to the north and 24 would be that there would be no final plat approval until the order of the 429 improvements. Joe Jablonski, Lennar Homes, spoke representing the applicant. Regarding the discussion of density, he noted that the gross density of the single family area is 2.04 units per acre. The net density is driven up to 3.0 units per acre due to the open space, storm water facilities, and roads that are included on the site. Regarding different elevations and architectural styles, Mr.Jablonski highlighted the variety that Lennar brings in an attempt to avoid redundancy. There are currently 6.1 acres in park land and that number could go up if the tot lot in the townhome area was included. In terms of open space and ponding, Jablonski noted that there is 26.6 acres. Regarding 5th Street, Mr. Jablonski noted that Lennar's vision for 51h Street is very similar to the City's vision. He noted that the design of the parkway makes a good pedestrian environment. Moving on, Jablonski spoke about the townhome portion of the plat, noting that there is sufficient parking to serve the site. He also spoke about Condition #17, pertaining to the alignment of Streets A and E. He noted that Lennar is opposed to the alignment because they are concerned that this alignment would encourage speeding. Dodson asked about the finances of the Common Interest Community. Jablonski noted that there would be financial reserves for the structures, landscaping, streets and other elements as dictated by the state of Minnesota. Morreale noted that it looks like the applicant is proposing a nice community. He wanted to know who is responsible to maintain a large portion of the landscaping. Jablonski noted that the open areas would be maintained by the HOA. Home owners would be responsible to maintain the trees in front of their property. Lame Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 S Public Hearing opened at 8:35pm. Wayne Prowse, 697 Julep Ave. N., noted that he would like to talk about density and parks. He noted that he does not think that it is appropriate for kids to play in the street. He also noted that he is concerned about the parking facilities in the subdivision. The second issue that he wanted to discuss was the density included in the proposed subdivision. He is concerned that the neighborhood will not be a quality environment. He feels that the neighborhood is too dense. Greg McGrath, 15th St. Ct., asked where the funding is coming from for the utilities. Zuleger noted that the extension is being assessed to the property owners. McGrath asked where the water utility is coming from.Zuleger noted that the temporary solution is from Oakdale, The system will be hooked up to the Lake Elmo City water system once water is extended down Inwood Ave. North. McGrath then inquired about the Landscape Plan of the proposal. He asked who is responsible to ensure performance. Zuleger noted that the City will not release the financial credit for the landscape plan until the plan has been fully executed. Williams asked Staff if there have been any written comments submitted. Klatt stated that there were no other written comments received. Nancy Andert, 697 Julep Ave. N., asked where sewer will be dug to serve the site. Klatt noted that the sewer will be extended from the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Blvd. to Keats Ave. north to a lift station to the north of the subject parcel. Public Hearing closed at 8:48pm Morreale began the discussion by talking about the City's park system. He noted that the Stonegate Park is not large enough to serve all of the homes that are prepared for this area, In addition, he noted that he is concerned about on-street parking. Finally, Morreale noted that he prefers that the trail follow closer to the Lennar subdivision as opposed to closer to the Stonegate neighborhood. Larson asked if the property to the north could collaborate with Lennar on a larger, more traditional park to serve the entire area. Zuleger noted that the Parks Commission made recommendations about adding parkland in the north central area of the Hammes property. Larson asked if the residents of the proposed development could walk to the park in the Hammes neighborhood. Staff confirmed that the park that ultimately serves the Hammes property would be accessible to the residents of the Lennar neighborhood. Dodson asked about transit facilities that may serve the site. Zuleger noted that 5th Street would be able to be served by local transit service. Johnson stated that transit planning is always being evaluated by Metro Transit when Comprehensive Plans are amended. fake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22.-13 6 Haggard addressed the comment made by Mr. Prowse, recommending that the City only allow parking on one side of the street. She said that this recommendation is based on consideration for public safety and children walking and biking in the neighborhood. Klatt noted that the City's base standard is a 28'wide street. The City also requires 2 off street parking spaces per home and additional parking for multi-family. Haggard noted that she prefers parking on one side of the street only and no overnight parking. Morreale and Dodson both noted that it is difficult to eliminate on-street parking completely. Currently the City parking ordinance allows a 48 hour maximum. Williams noted that he could not find any conditions related to the required permits for watershed district. Klatt stated that it is part of the engineers report and is covered under Condition#11. Kreimer noted that he did not agree with the realignment of Streets A and E. He suggested deleting Condition #17. Next, Kreimer noted that the Landscape Plan utilized Linden Trees, which tend to be negatively affected by Asian Beetles. Williams commented that species should be conditioned upon salt tolerance and other considerations. Moving on, Kreimer noted that 51h Street may be moved to the South. He noted that he has concern about moving the plat forward when this issue is not resolved. Klatt noted that if they have to revise their plat, it would require a public hearing before the Planning Commission. Kreimer also asked about the alignment of Street A with the proposed development to the North. Regarding the trail along Stonegate, Kreimer wanted to ensure that this is moved further south. Kreimer noted that he feels strongly that there should be more parkland in the neighborhood. He suggested having a joint park between the Lennar and Hammes. Haggard asked about parking considerations. Klatt noted that the conditions only address the items or requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Code, or Comprehensive Plan that are currently lacking. If the Planning Commission wishes to have a broader discussion about parking, Klatt recommended evaluating parking City wide as opposed to subdivision by subdivision. Zuleger suggested adding to Condition #3 & #4 that the trail in Outiot A be move to the south closer to the Savona neighborhood. This would meet the spirit of the greenbelt buffer agreement. Williams asked for a straw vote. First, he asked if there should be more parkland in the plat. Most of the Commissioners agreed that more parkland would be prudent. Klatt presented information about neighborhood parks vs. regional parks. He also mentioned that the City was looking for some park dedication money to help fund a future community sports complex in the Village Area that would serve the entire Lake Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 7 Elmo community. Klatt also stated that the park plan has a suggested ratio of parkland dedication based on national standards of 11 acres per 1000 residents. M/S/P: Williams/Morreale, move to postpone consideration of the Plat until the Planning Commission receives consultation regarding the parkland from a member of the Parks Commission, Vote: 5-1, Motion Carried, with Haggard voting no. Larson asked if consideration of the parkland will include collaboration with neighboring properties. Morreale noted that he is still concerned about the parking issue. Klatt noted that parking is not directly addressed in the Subdivision Ordinance. He recommended not making parking regulations subdivision by subdivision. Rather,the City should evaluate parking ordinances City wide, not neighborhood by neighborhood. The Planning Commission had consensus regarding the changes related to other Conditions of the Plat: delete #17 and revise #4. Business Item: Zoning Text Amendment—Landscape Requirements. Johnson presented a proposed amendment to the Zoning Ordinance to add a new section concerning landscaping that will replace three existing sections of the code that deal with landscaping requirements. Johnson reviewed the existing sections of the ordinance that address landscaping, including the Subdivision, Site Plan Review, and Open Space Preservation (OP) Ordinances. He stated that it is important to organize the landscape requirements into one location in the code. Johnson reviewed the general outline and requirements of the proposed landscape ordinance. Morreale asked if the ordinance requires a minimum caliper measurement of 2.5 inches versus 1 inch. Johnson replied that the new ordinance specifies minimum sizes of landscape materials, including trees, in Table 6-1. Kreimer asked about a maximum height requirement on the Code. Johnson replied that this standard is referencing a situation with a berm. He also asked who would be responsible to replace dead trees planted by the developer on private lots. Johnson noted that he would look into other options related to the timing of tree installation. Dodson expressed concern over the approval of landscaping plans and how a developer could be held responsible for this work once their project is completed. Dodson asked if the ordinance could address situations in which a developer prefers to keep more open space or to restore native prairie areas, and if the City can require developers to plant Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 8 trees that are native to Minnesota. Johnson explained that he would research this issue. Williams commented that the correct plant species for the correct area should be an important consideration of the ordinance. The Commission requested clarification on some of the specific aspects of the draft ordinance, and requested that Staff provide a red-lined version of the ordinance with any changes made by Staff prior to further discussion on this matter. Updates and Concerns There will be a special Planning Commission meeting on July 29t". The Lennar Development will be brought back and the staff will make an effort to have Parks Commission Chair Weiss and others there. Council update Council Update—The City Council adopted the Administrative and Enforcement Ordinance at the July 2nd meeting with some minor changes. They removed the design and demolition standards until the design standards manual is done. The City Council adopted the fence ordinance at the July 16th meeting with some minor changes regarding solid wall fences up to 6 feet on properties smaller than Y2 acre. The City Council approved plans and specifications for the section 34 utility project at the July 16th meeting. Meeting adjourned at 10:15pm Respectfully submitted, Nick Johnson Planner Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes, 7-22-1.3 THE MY OF City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 29, 2013 Vice Chairman Reeves called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Reeves, Dorschner, Dodson, Kreimer, Morreaie; COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Larson, Haggard and Williams STAFF PRESENT: City Planner Johnson, Planning Director Klatt Approve Agenda: The Planning Commission accepted the agenda as presented. Approve Minutes:July 22, 2013 M/S/P: Kreimer/Dodson, move to accept the minutes of July 22, 2013 as amended; Vote:5-0. Motion Carried, with Reeves and Dorschner not voting. Kreimer noted two corrections to the minutes, one regarding who is responsible to replace boulevard trees that die before lots are sold, and the other change pertaining to the ratio of the amount of parkland per resident recommended in the park plan. Both were amendments were accepted. Business Items: Preliminary Plat—Lennar Homes Klatt began his presentation by presenting a general outline of how the meeting is to proceed. He explained that the Mayor has requested to address the Planning Commission. In addition, per the request by the Planning Commission, the Chairman of the Park Commission, Shane Weis, will present the recommendation of the body, as well as answer any questions by the Planning Commission. Finally, Klatt noted that there will be a small amount of time allocated for public comment, as the Public Hearing has already been closed. Klatt moved forward to present the important highlights of the Staff Report. Regarding density, he noted that the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Klatt stated that the Comprehensive Plan utilizes an accepted practice of planning for growth using density ranges. This method is used due to the great variation from parcel to parcel due to roads, wetlands, slopes, soils and other reasons that make hitting an exact density figure on every parcel difficult. Klatt also presented an overview about Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 2 how the Comprehensive Plan was developed in terms of land uses and buffering as compared to the previous Comprehensive Plan. Moving forward, Klatt discussed the aspect of the Staff Report that pertains to parkland dedication. He noted that when staff makes a recommendation regarding parks, they rely heavily on the input of the Park Commission, Parks staff and the City Administrator. The feedback that Staff received is that it is not critical to install more parkland than is currently being presented in the proposed development. It was stressed that it is important that the City have the ability to maintain whatever parks are dedicated and that they work for the needs of the development. He also presented a map that highlighted all of the park facilities in the Western portion of the 1-94 Corridor. Included in these facilities are two existing City parks (Ridge and,Stonegate),the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve, existing trails and proposer>,"trails. He noted how these facilities relate to the City's overall park plan. Klatt wrapped up his presentation by highlighting other questions from the previous Planning Commission meeting. He discussed the parking issue that was previously raised, describing the amount of,property in between the structure and tl,e:front property line. He also described how the City arrived;at the 28' wide road standard, noting that this standard represents a balance betwee'Ahe needs of emergency vehicles, maintenance, parking and traffic calmjng and circulation. Related to streets, he noted that the Lenna'r proposal meets all of the`City standards. Klatt also spoke about the 5th Street realignment request,,-from the property ow.her to the West. He noted that Staff is not recommending that�ahy special conditions be imposed on the Lennar application pertaining to the realignment of the road. Alternatively, Staff is recommending that the.property owners continue working on a realignment, and the City will allowthe:realignrnentto happen uvithout;the applicant needing to come back through the plattingprocess. To wrap u,p the Staff presentation, Klatt highlighted the revised list of conditions. He also listed draft findings for the Planning Commission to utilize for a potential motion. Kreimer asked about Condition #19, noting that access was discussed to the north as well. Klatt noted that Kreimer is correct, and the condition should allow for access to the north. Morreale asked what the City requirements were pertaining to parkland. Klatt noted that the Subdivision Ordinance requires a 10% land dedication or fee in lieu of land dedication. He noted that fees are used to acquire additional parkland and install park facilities. Morreale asked what the pure land dedication for the Lennar proposal would be. Klatt noted that the land dedication without fees would be 11.8 acres. Morreale noted that Stonegate Park is not large enough to accommodate all the new residents that will eventually live in this area. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 3 Reeves asked if the 6.4 proposed acres of park include the other open space areas included in the proposed plat. Klatt noted that the other areas are not counted towards parkland. These areas also serve as storm water retention. As a follow up, Dodson asked which outlots are owned by the City vs. the HOA. Klatt highlighted a list within the plat that notes all of the ownership of the various outlots. Reeves asked if the HOA would own the outlots shown in the townhome area. Klatt confirmed that the areas around the townhomes are HOA owned. Dorschner asked if trails are included as parkland dedication. Klatt confirmed that linear parks will only be accepted if the developer builds the trails. Reeves asked if the City is creating a challenge of meetingthe MOU with the Metropolitan Council if the City continues to accept;developMent that is under the minimum thresholds. Klatt noted that the City has to continue to monitor the numbers guided by the MOU against platted lots. In addition, he noted thatthere are sometimes unique circumstances on sites that aren't always factored in such asbuffers, parks, storm water ponds, etc. Mike Pearson, 2805 Lisbon Ave N,, Mayor of Lake Ebro spoke about the history of the 1-94 Corridor planning effort. He rioted that the plan balanced protection of the existing neighborhoods, orderly growth of the community, reasonable use to develop the land, and meeting the requirements of the Met Council.. He commended the Planning Commission's efforts in'the"long range plan ning;process,.as well as the review of the plat. He indicated'that the planning for grouvth in the 1-94 Corridor has been a long and extensive process, and,,it is important to kee-p.--moving the process forward. Shane Weis,'8483 27fh St N., the Ch iirmi an of the.Park Commission, spoke to the Planning Commission._He noted that the ParkCommissiions view on new development would be to have one central open area, which Lennar does. This plan would be acceptable to the Park Coa�nmission.' Dorschner asked the Chairman if there are any studies done to indicate the current level of park use. Weis-noted that Lake Elmo's parkland to citizen ratio is very high, which also means that maintenance is very high. The Park Commission needs to strike a balance between maintenanceand quality of life with parkland. Dorschner noted that the maintenance of these parks must be considered. The City must ensure that we have the ability to maintain the parks well. This plan factors in both the needs of the future residents of the development and the cost of maintenance. The City needs to consider the resources required for park maintenance. Kreimer asked if any of the park funds would be used for a broader facility for the community. Weis noted that the funds would go into the general parkland dedication fund. The specific use for those funds would be determined at a future time. Johnson Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 4 stated that the Village land use plan does call for a community recreational facility which will guide the use of some of these funds. Morreale asked if the amount of parkland, particularly for the western portion of the neighborhood, is acceptable to the Park Commission. Weis stated that the Park Commission is comfortable with the current park as it is a central park and they factored in the maintenance. Morreale stated he feels that the proposed park is not large enough for this many people and they should be required to put in the full size. Johnson stated that the City has the flexibility to accept in lieu of funds when it seems appropriate and it has been common practice in this cityin.the OP developments and in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. Dodson asked how small children will access neighborhood parks; Klatt noted that the City standard requires a sidewalk on one side of the street for the�yery purpose of maintaining proper accessibility. In addrtion,; he notes that the recent results from the Park Survey reveal that more residents are concerned about the maintenance of the existing parks on the system. Specifically, Klatt noted that the City has to befprepared to maintain the trail system that isFconstructed in addition'to maintaining existing and new parks. Weis also noted that there is a central park planned for the Hammes Estates development, which was recently reviewed at the Sketch`-Plan level by the Planning Commission and Park Commission Reeves asked for more specific feedback from the Park survey. Weis stated that, at this time, they have not analyzed the-data, but will be doing so at their next meeting. r Dorschner`� ed:ifthe parksthat were°dedicated Were for use by the residents that livedinthe development, or`if,they are for'165e,of any resident of the City. Weis stated thatany dedicated Park-land is a City park and can be used by anyone. Reeves asked Weis if he felt the City parks were underutilized, properly utilized, or over utilized. Weis:noted that the Park Commission currently believes that the City parks are underutilized Weis asked Klatt about the tot lots. Klatt explained that there might be space available in the multi-family area for a tot lot. Joe Jablonski, Lennar Homes, noted that Lennar has built homes all over the Twin Cities and across the country. He shared his experiences pertaining to park land in the context of the neighborhoods Lennar has platted and built. He noted that small neighborhood parks have been very successful in addressing the needs of families with young children. He noted that more programmed parks with team sports require much greater amounts of parkland. Moving forward, Jablonski presented two concepts of the central park of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 5 the Savona plat. These concepts are intended to illustrate how the proposed park space can be utilized. Reeves opened the forum for brief public comment. He noted that there were written comments submitted by Commissioners Williams and Larson that the Commissioners reviewed. Susan Dunn, 11018 Upper 33rd St., asked the Planning Commission to consider the City's "Commitment to the Community". She also noted that many people have worked hard to preserve land in the City. Dunn noted that this is the first time that she has seen the Savona Plat proposal, noting she felt overwhelmed by the,intensity of the development. She stated that there should be additional parkland to serve the young families that will locate in the neighborhood. In addition, Dunn asked the Plahrting Commission to consider the EAW and surface water management plan of the development. Charlie Devine represents the owners of the>Louis Damiani Trust and Tim Montgomery parcel. Devine was complimentary of Lennar, stating that they have beengood to work with in the development process..„He noted that;the prE1.perty owners he represents, as well as the development grouph'e is.part of, wish to rea ign the 5th Street minor collector road further to the south. He-noted that the City has taken a hands off approach thus far. He is asking that the City facilitate bringing parties to the table to bring resolution to the alignment of the°minor collector road.<:He is asking on behalf of the property owners that-the,-resolution bf the.S" street alignment be an additional condition of platapproval. He'.stated that hesupports the°Lennar neighborhood, but needs to see realignment of the collector road. Wayne Prouvse; 697 Julep Aye N., noted that if the development is 112 acres, than the City should require the full parkland dedication. 'He also cited a Pioneer Press article thatstates that the Lake Elmo Park Reserve is overwhelmed with visitors. He stated that there is not enough parkland in'the Savona plat. He also noted that the density of the plat is above the expected amount. He asked that the Planning Commission look out for the quality of life in Lake Elmo. Reeves opened up discussion to the Planning Commission. Morreale stated that he feels that the Savona plat will set the bar for future severed development. He stated that if the Planning Commission allows this development to move forward,than all of the future developments will follow the precedent. Reeves asked Morreale if he thought any future developments are impacted by the parks around it. Morreale stated that he feels that parks are a key thing that should not be eliminated. Kreimer noted that it was stated that Lake Elmo already has an overabundance of parks. However, he stated that Lake Elmo has never had high density before. For this reason, Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 6 Kreimer noted that now is not the time to pull back on parkland. He stated that there should be more parks for the amount of residents. Dorschner noted that in an ideal world, everyone's property would back up to a park. He shared that he visited Stonegate Park last week. He noted that the park is not in great use. He notes that he would prefer to use the park system for trails that connect people to parkland and allow for alternative transportation. He stated that he respects other perspectives on parkland, but prefers additional trails. Dodson asked Staff about the comments by Mr. Devine pertaining to the alignment of 5th Street. in addition, he asked if there is any planned.improvement or bridge for crossing Keats Ave or 10th Street. Klatt noted that a grade separated trail would be problematic on Keats Ave. He noted that a grade separated trail would be ideal but costly. Related to 5th Street, Klatt explained the:Staff position that the City does not want to take a position between a matter of''negotiation between three active land owners. Reeves asked if it would be practical for the City to impose some type of time frame to move negotiations pertaining to the 4 gnment of the collector road forward. Klatt noted that the 5th Street realignment will be,'considered if it is brought forward, but we are dealing with a lot of'uncertainties. Dorschner stated that he feels it is the City's responsibilityto.encaurage resolution of the alignment of 5th Street. He stated that Lennar should hav,eto work to resolve the issue so it is not a vuinner take all result. '- Dodson stated that" he;is on the fence regardiing the parks issue. In addition, he does not share Dorschner's feeling that irn,posing a condition on the alignment of 5th Street is the fair way to ap"roach it. Morreale stated that'he is concerned about the amount of park space. He feels that the City has set the land requirement at 10%. In addition, if we accept less for this plat, it will happen for the plats moving forward. Reeves noted thathe shares the concern about allowing for enough places for families of kids to play. Nevertheless, he is sensitive to the recommendation and thoughts of the Park Commission. Johnson stated that the City needs to think in broader terms of the parks system vs. individual plans. Johnson stated the City has the statutory authority to take 10% park dedication in any combination of land and fee, depending on the circumstances and would not be setting any precedent from one plan to another. Morreale stated that he disagrees with the interpretation of Planner Johnson in terms of a bar being set for parkland for every park coming forward. Klatt noted that the park plan does not provide substantive guidance in how to program neighborhood parks. Also, there is not a significant push from the Parks Commission to Lake Flmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 7 recommend additional parkland for this plat. He encourages the Planning Commission to dialogue with the Park Commission on future plats. Dorschner stated that the Park Commission was represented, and it is not the place of the Planning Commission to questions their recommendation. M/S/P: Dodson/Dorschner, move to recommend approval of the Savona Preliminary Plat with the revised Condition ##19, Vote:3-2. Motion Carried, with Kreimer and Morreale voting no. Updates and Concerns Council update—None Staff update— Planning Commission meetings upcoming on;august 12 and 26. Commission Concerns-- Dorschner asked if the future reside If..be notified'pertaining to potential nuisances in the area, including the mining operation`arid gun range within close proximity. Klatt noted that he will do someresearch to-see how this=.will be addressed. .y Meeting adjourned'at.9:53pm Respectfully SUGAi tja;d., (Vick Johnson Planner Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 Kyle Klatt From: Alan Dale[adaie@daletileco.coml Sent: Friday, July 26, 2013 1:14 PM To: Kyle Kiatt; Nick Johnson; Dean Zuleger Cc: steve.ach@lennar.com Subject: RE: Sonoma per plat- 5th Street Kyle, We support Lennar in their desire to keep 5th Street as located on the Lennar Preliminary Plat. I have exchanged emails with the Amaris Group about moving 5th Street to the South. This move would relocate about 2 acres of valuable high density land to the Lennar parcel north of 5t6 Street. This additional acreage is of marginal value to Lennar and not necessary for Lennar. l have asked Amaris to reimburse us for this lost 2 acres if the road is moved south. My understanding from Amaris's last email is that they were not willing to pay for this acreage. We remain open to discussions with Amaris and Lennar and if something can be worked out we can make the correction before the final plat is recorded. Our interest is to be reasonably compensated for the lost acreage, Thanks, Alan Gale Stonehenge USA 6007 Culligan Way Minnetonka, MN 55345 O: 952.288.2201 C: 612.718.3793 adaleastonehenae-usa.com www.stonehenae-usa.com Apa 1bNElt LSD From: Steven Ach [mailto:Steve.Ach@! gnnar,com) Sent.:Tuesday, July 02, 2013 4:07 PM To: Kyle Klatt Cc: Alan Dale; Joe Jablonski Subject: Sonoma per plat - 5th Street Kyle it sounds like Alan Dale needs to work out some details with the buyers of the Montgomery property before he agrees to moving 5th Street to the south. Given the short amount of time we have before the Planning Commission meeting I think for your review of our preliminary plat lets assume 5th Street will not be moving. Lennar wants to proceed with the plat as submitted. If you want to discuss please call me Thanks Sent from my iPad Steve Ach Land Acquisition Manager Lennar 1 Members of the Planning Commission, I regret i am unable to attend tonight's meeting, but 1 am on a trip planned long before this special meeting was scheduled. However, i cannot stop thinking about the Lennar subdivision, since it is our first large, sewered subdivision, and our decisions about it may well influence our decisions about the future sewered subdivisions on the horizon. For comparison, we can look at similar subdivisions in nearby cities, such as Lennar's Millbrook near 96 and 15 in Stillwater.As we consider the developments in our City, we will probably make mistakes along the way, but that is the nature of the process of creating our unique City of Lake Elmo. The following are my own thoughts and opinions and are offered for your consideration. 1. Overall,the Lennar subdivision appears to be an acceptable one, based on our current regulations, with a couple of concerns. 2. The Lennar and Hammes subdivisions will have over 450 homes, which means well over 1000 people. 3. The Lennar plat is about% mile north/south and about 2/3 mile east/west. The Hammes plat is about% x% mile. Lake Elmo has a stated policy of having"pedestrian friendly" developments. In my mind this means a "destination" park(as opposed to a trail)within%mile of any home. i believe the Stonegate Park was located where it is in order to serve additional development to the west. 4. The Lennar plat has a nice trail system. It has one, nice shady park:great for a couple of picnic tables, a tot lot, maybe a half-court basketball area. But there is no open field for sports activities, like baseball, soccer,football, flying a kite, etc.These could be accommodated by a simple, relatively level, open field with minimal equipment, although it might be nice to have a backstop and a 1-2 table shade pavilion at some point in the future. Such a field would not be a big maintenance burden: for example, there would be no need for a manicured baseball infield, at least at the start. 5. For the Lennar subdivision,the City should require in addition the dedication of about 2 acres for an open park, imagining some future layout similar to the active area of Reid Park.The location should be within%mile of all homes.Certainly, a site straddling the border between the Lennar and Hammes subdivisions, and serving both, should be considered, 5. Our laws allow the City to require up to 10%of the land in a new subdivision to be dedicated for parks.Of course,the developer will object to this amount. But once the land is developed with homes, it is practically impossible to recover it for a park.Therefore,we should acquire the land when we can, even if it is not developed for a park immediately. The City can sell off parkland later, if desired, but it realistically cannot buy it back once developed,without expensive and messy condemnation proceedings. 7. 1 am also concerned with the County's comments about traffic impacts along Keats Ave,for both Lennar and Hammes plats. Is a berm unrealistic? Would a solid fence or wall be feasible? Is there some other mitigation possible? 8. 1 am also concerned about the total impervious surface coverage (over 50%?) and storm water runoff. Is the proposed storm water management system adequate for the expected runoff volume? I have asked the City Engineer for his comments. Respectfully submitted by Todd Williams Kyle Klatt From: Rolf Larson jhalver@mac.com) Sent: Monday, July 29, 2013 10:04 AM `Co: Nick Johnson; Kyle Klatt Cc: Rolf Larson Subject: Unable to attend 7/29 meeting with notes Greetings! My wife' s father died last Friday evening. Visitation is tonight @ Bradshaw. The funeral will be tomorrow morning in Stillwater. I also have a couple comments on this week's meeting notes: 1) As Lennar is getting to set "the bar" for future developments by being the first development in the 94 corridor, so are we are also setting "the bar" for development expectations. Adequate open area for child activities and parental supervision need to be clear expectations. 2) These new housing developments will have many children. They will tend to have large homes on smaller lots. Children need to have open ground for play. If we don't want them playing in the streets, they need to have play areas and open space for actives activity. 3) I really like the trails Lennar is offering in their plan. 4) Buffer existing developments such as Stonegate that were developed under different models (larger yards, more open space) . They have legitimate expectations that need to be protected by open space and appropriate buffering! I like both park models projected in this week's packet but feel that the first Outlot F model with; a) open space; b) play sets; and c)a shaded seating area for parents to be with their children as they play (shade, picnic tables (or gazebo) and a grill is most appropriate for this development because of the number of children who will be moving into these new homes. Sorry I will be missing tonight's meeting. I am so pleased with our decision to see to these important details in our future development. Rolf i OUNCEPT SKETCH PLAN IX 110' -4 x 50, w07-26-2013 SAVONA 20121161 LAKE ELMO, NIN ". �'Xrvm'.Tot" J L 1 ar F 0 2013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc. Call 48 Hours before dlggmg'. 1 / t 811 or cc11811.com 1 / I Common Ground Alliance Development Data: 1 / n pM_Areo lCaloulofed\ to LY of 5th Streerl:rros_ tB1,6 arc Srrgfe F mJy Residential 91.8t oc !/ 1 ____ ___ _____________ __ Mdtr Farnity Rswdentea' 208f- 4o eAipprr Cdleetor Read/Sth SIREET)ROW: 12.0« _ _ Stngle FomJy Partner 6.0t« rM ^-- -�., 1L_ Ji Multi F-ify Portion; 1.91 arc 6_ t __ I I __�I I tl +I __ I __ O.V0 M Patron_' 4.It ac- - pia Jso uI J3a J°o nu »o Jpo-r »u Pork OedleatLm: him -` L_ I J „°x✓ ra poc,r .:sa✓ ra sx✓ I rGSJo„ rase✓ 1 rasro✓ 1 ,-sw✓ roar r (Oufrofs A&F.and boa part'.,or E) e•ar 1wA4�°I PARK/GR£ENWAY 2 Othe-n,krct oosr So[.26.7r m EXCEPTION ° , 2 6 I I I (Inomdes Baffas.Fondng,&other P.Vaeo.) .sae„ I � ^ -'J �S-J L 7s- I -' rs.. J _. zs L ems-J J T>`3i Single FamaY Ly°o�«R' t6.73« II 11 II •p7 rr�lac_,n :--�"_--- -� � -_-- � L_ � __J - (wtrafse,c,oE,c,„) F- - Murn-Famay open SP.M. toot« 2 (oallofs L.t K.L not private streets&driveuon) enz.r nasr✓ ra // \ ,A.+, rLhY.r / f' r r- 1-7 r -i r - r-' r 's- - f Net Dewlmed Arse: 809« I / �Iw 2 I I� r-- -� r- r a rl: ✓I I 1 I $ „ J" 8! `Q zaw'+' I- K L- "°--J I I I I I I -Single Famay net area(net ROW,Pork&Q spore)6271 oc L 1 4--, I 8° 1 7 I 6 $ I 4 , I 3 I 2 I 1 -stwrl-Faoay net or°o(net Pondinq 065 ea&ROW)152:ac rao,r ra Sw,r ra.'V•r i JL ,� J 11 I ✓� I L-- -J f a•zs,l �i o.xa,r aJop✓ U.ov✓ .( ! Pr«o.ed soar Fm„rP mer tare roes v\ \ rio e.o p » ,_- 65'wme r l40'deep t)pk-&• 95 rots �,F\ rs L_ J y I 1 IL 1 I I 75'wide.r 140'deep t)pKOL• 93 tots s 1_ 4rT sro" IL JL--J�r u,k: v2L.-- - '" - a ROW To.Manes: 44 ho reA 12rrer ----7 I IIj j-121 rBack-Back T wnhomes.• 78 banesL - , _ , I I I ne•e+l ✓ \ / mr. _-") f0 I pia / o roll Proa If ep• My banes, '% � _ ' $ •aru. _I race°„ ,: fjl�j 14 OUTLOTG276 un« oE.rdlr,l -� iy� I Orera'i Oros..nenstt. / ( ) 9 ( \`r Cr -�il1._ti 1 -Single Fom°y Grose Density. 205✓n/« '.tlt6 i I I ' r$ \@7 � J l )4- J e T J -MwK F-dy Or-OMsifX 586 un/°c r�.____I_ \✓ `�! \ ,Err ,J \ I I e � �-.is I Oreralt Nef 0°nsl 3B2 un/x o,wdl L- =J - / \ \I ) �L �{� Ax♦s✓° ) -Se'9re FmnaY Cross Density ?.99 un/« J-a✓ _ 7r - `� rtrJa✓ /yht \ \\ ,`r L•-ai� 1 ` `' '�J �1 -MwU 1- Net OMrt)c 6.70 un/« f / \]C% J ----- r -,r 8 ^ rp a➢,r' \ \\ r�1 V,.__ /'� ; r Pmeesed skid.F ie oew_.,Standards: f- ra�ao✓ "moo+' 4 / ro \/� ��~ \�,1\ � sup / / Front Satbock. 25' 4'" Ar%,r I r ✓ Eez ✓ g yam/ '\< �� I ^ / 1 e,sez+l� \ L f/� Side Setbock•(see note belo.k 75'/75'(15 W.1) ° •aezo✓ •+ ! Sid.SIfDOck(Coma Lefe)' 15' r Rea Sefbdek 2D' / 17 f9 ! f �// a ✓ Mmknam Lof Aso 9,100:r a L •� \, , , ' �-- n sea✓ r-_ Araags Lot Area. 11.1752 of �"� � - ' r ,,✓ ,ri 1 � -J L j \.c. \\\/ \>< \ ? � r - I - ir sRe Area as u, ��: .,\\•. n /, ° /\ / `� ,aJJ< 1 •.1 e+r.� F Required Site Area per umf. 6000sradu y - 4 Provided Goss Slfe Area Pa u t 7.426 st _ 1 are d °C°idea.: 1 ,( ,I r• I I�i \_ { \ / L(. _ 2 1 '\ i r y , ~f Maximum ImPaN«s Coverage: 50x 1\ 6 7 B �I \ ,f. (_ t I r ,ztt✓ r I \ rJ > \ ` ,j I $ono+e�J I Proposed Imp-5 Coverage 4Jx V rs.'1 M]✓ rTJ✓ AJe6,J P.raj✓r 12J,6, \ \ \. _ �\ IM (���- )" a, 1 f • \ -Tl .. � � �Z/•�a � i_r I � � Ghen Seeep R ipmwrtp• / 1�' 1 • ` e 6 �� •Ps:✓ 7 " 2 l C K �-- _ aegarred OWn SPoca per ✓rrif. Soo sf Provided Open Space Per uroe A$70 st "e- _ J f L � es ✓ \ ( D t B a f` (arrors L a K.L/e=,pr;wre sheet°&or,,,/r22) 1 h � l �'• AJce� � \, ,\ �t o}_"` �] oa4 r , a� l - �,.( I �\\ 1 ` J rig 5 0, 1' �^�\�� 'p Prm°see semeeks/mnm msl 1 \ ` y f dlr 3 1 �(�'•('YY� l "j� 7 mtanul ROW 25' Keats Aar. 50'to sf ofvros I 1 OMOTD 1� 1 B -5 -J s err xwi• Adl St't op ear.' 4o'ro shuofwes _ < 4.Jm,I r ,aJJz } r z l L. 1+u✓ -J -Lo rc , sy \ \ �`. .> AdkcarfPrepatY Jo' tsrz,r L S \ 1 LP OUTLOT F C 8 ) v xm:+r P-teSepara 0, -8reetn9 d1 Buaang 25'Op vp _ r -, I}II r _ 161' 8 Pnwte Ori.e street W4dtn 24'tzp(60) t 46 ti. rr ' I i1 i- - - _ I er,tzJ err r• sJ5 f r° Pnrofe 0,,...y Lo,geh 21''mm•24'f)prcd 6 Mm.brg setboak toriva-'\ �PARX CL a } ra°r.• r >� a ,a.mz 1 private street(s,de) 10 min \ L I L d;` I ssz✓ All /J^ `(, _ f - I ON-street OLesl Po,kmg proNded 025 per unit Outlet TarNe• B Esmt/Cpm o TE 0.11o1 A Greenwaylpork w city 406 m OUILO CU /) 1' / r / � Nor en Space ROA 151 oar 1 0 .� \ \ \ 1 `l, azsa✓ v / o s __J z s,rw,. /Opa,Sp Y,$ � ! p.1bf C Omd me Cit 5.66« ll ll C1 J Po J• L a f> p}�. \ ♦ 'ao7sp✓ t .ela ' 7 n ,c tie I7 / Cuaof D Paid/Open Sp«e city 167« Ourmt£ Pand/Open SP«e City 4.95 m 1 1 R=100000 l k <\ ra,us,• 8 v/ '� °•° r / aaor F Park ally 11 200«.II L=27T.43 .zy / T=f37.07 ,' \ ax9r )/ \ /`� ra$.•ea Culbt C Open so NOA 213 are. 1 1 �AT �! L - / o / 11' Qraor N OPm Spocc NOA a77 m. 1 1 G;1271.33� \ �n •�' ^< k°4 / Outrof I Pmd/Open Sp«e C,ty 1..7°e I 1 0 > Wt1or J Open Spot° HOA 2.52 arc C8=N68 4T18"W �`-s'srwate \ .arse+, i ° Typical Lot Detail P)5TA=41+T7.29 1A1J a \ V �� �� e / ) err WAc,, 1; . a'swtte Outmf K Open space rroA 6B9« yP 1, \ I Outlet At FW.e Development Ot ra 6589 m 1^ Development Notes X 1 1 Js� t axe✓ E5 i5 - 1 1 \\ it p/ ra:ae✓ D j a (Hn are+) 1 ` V �/$ rozre✓ I I 'a Ma✓ 1 ,v 1 ALL COT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO WE NEAREST FOOL v 1 / a � �°& + , 1`• 2. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST SQUARE FOOT �* , UtailY fosanent Ill � I I s < � JI 4 3. STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY THE CITY Setback Line v yr 2F 1 4. DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PRO14DED AS REQUIRED` 1 . rI� �'� tr - • DRAINAGE AND U17LITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC m,e,sim Lot D rsme.,d Uwwvr-•=�v _r 2' UI7Lf IIES BLANKET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER THE EN77R£ 9.100 st �- Lot Number \ 1 I OUMOTU J2 ^ 23 OUTLOT TO BE PROVDED ON FINAL PLAT FOR ALL OF OUTLOT A THROUGH �- Lot Area \ 11 '10 sf I - � 1 I °9'pjO6i sttru+t C2 R=82D.00 5. STREET MOTHS 57i0WN ARE FROM OF BACK OF CURB TO BACK CURB LL-- - II I yH T=556.82 6 SIDE SETBACKS OF 75 &75'(15' TOTAL)REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE d 6B°2123� OF CODE REQUIRED 5'&10 (15' TOTAL) SETBACKS. 0• 100' 200 300' STREET ll s 1 r CB=SB4a50'17aw NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION I y I P/STA=29+04.16 10 1n 61Pppo1 ewo D. 03/28/13 Shoet 8 or 23 Ww«^,wd,w..ww s.W�ion se+b°.uy m w pd.•1�sr' a�°'mr 9..Ir.. Piepeml for. Savona w,pa.u=vd m.r r r•�m.,.a uHo swv�oe Eem P.,MN,HHeeaN We�"�'^d W.+�d asn+n]M,ia rw all aamrwrl• oan,ns e.+..4.err.e•,a+.e,+ Oebet Lennar Corporation Pre ary site PHOHs. sszav-spso +,ens wnu,dr•ne+_.,.,ea. ru ;sz•.sr's°a �""` 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 601) Plan muEses -lip-,eo �6 W. /14t,xis • a_0lewlx.b/a.k Westwood � n.r 06n�yq uer..•Ja. 29021 - - Plymouth, Minnnesote,55446 Take Elmo,Minnesota F o2013 Westwood Professional Services,Inc. Call 48 Hours before di in 99 9' 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance I �sore ----------------------------------------------------------___________________________-250 - OUMOT 8 am o r — L 1 \ H;T, i1 i,ara4 III 5 6 7 1 1 OU7i OTC l I I I I I I�I _JL_, JL o II I II J L JL J s >s >s > -as- 'ss- Iz-- o _ 4 0-0 ' •�*, t r 1 C� , 'E � �'o L=554.41 I r -1 r 73 r 1 -r r 1 — zer�., C "• I ,r, / - _ CH=54J'1 II ,\/ 5, 1 d=J8°44'1B" l I I P-11-1 • C8=S70°J751"W 7 6 f 5 I 3 I 2 1 ! \ ; �, / ` P1 STA= +22.441,a,:sfr 1 raxx>,naI,0.30a L J LJL ys ��- J L J �. 433r,r � o � , / \ ,� � Y � ►�—► --� 1 r__� - _ � ono .,.as3, v ! c' ll�e.r � ,,•'� sa,,r M� ► �- 1r I - ^I I '11 __ _� re 2r � \\ f � �I a�f, � /, ^�•6S°b` i', e� ,�?QII"CGI ♦ —___— �frr r � I ' I loosen� ,:. ,• 1,o.zez>. � � Q•\ w, / err-� l_ I I I J ryc zv n o ' //ze`�✓ n ` / ` 4° Aaaa,, \� � / /.� 5 toa.ra- - ~� �•4,° '7i —��- M1 �, e t-„tl..JJ Ll, �� � '� � ,o fu u o a � -\r_-° v '• 1� r �.ypl.[ar \' � � ` .tr_v, 1 ° rLsa3 '� �+ � oxa,e), ► r/' 'R. rij �/�✓ a.a. ^ new r 6 1 OfIILOTH ,ata•„ .,� aert+ J 7 _ �° -r 8 1 � r ) Typical Lot Detail g ' l� , \ to / <�. -T` , I J 1,5%75' - ,awe. j 's--- .� (r7� \ 3 i., 8- ,� / • I rr r „ -y (fe scoa ' 9 ,.1-II t na, , ; •aza:r•,C '\ `� 15 0 az,r '• -s` .4- ;f I to �` L U1,74Ygek f I \ U°Y1L £asemenf J c room. I Y L _ 1 -6 \� xroz✓ �, ti \ ,d I I I I L Sefbock Lme r 8 y IP !� _Qc - Lot Oknensim OUILOTK - J - 1 t I I IT 9.100 sf- �' Cot Number R=1000,00 OUTLOTL LOUILOT E zn i'� T=18J 7J L — _ a 8 ` J 'fa•° r �/\ 6=20 49*17" f' J 65 75' 9 C8=S61°04'14"W 4f ? r3 _211 - ASTA=18+22J4 a i7 F I STREET 1 / ` ♦ 5t 9J i OV7LOTM 6 4 41 .8 R-289.00 38 1'=146.21 ,4'9.l.aeR Lr,o1 CH+<287.88 ` • C9><S6i°22'17"W P/STA-11+75.44 I I I I o' 100' 200= 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION tat11101VVV�t ash D.e 03/28/13 shot 9 of 23 . W.nwooa P, —kw s.Mosr,Ina ,•ter�r m+'+"e'm s rid b m,a >" wwrw.. _ Prepared for. Savona °°M P.�•�°� �'°`�'�"�'�"1Bv-' �^°^°"""°-al,��� Lennar Corporation Preliminary Site a^„ra..w"o.ae,eonm.ne. O.♦,ft olrowr vs:-ears,oa m/IeM I.wl a�e.v�,..«I ra. Pa% a3raa,a.rr �.,� Plan rausrrff rase-sar.srso Cnfs YY.lta�y RI8 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 {111CSrWOOd - K�[m` Plymouth, Minnnesota,55446 Lake Elmo.Minnesota Vol. wwe+an,.o4.mm 06A4A3 Les.t1► 2M 02013 Westwood Professionol Services, Inc. Vicinity Map LAKE Eagle ELMO �"ws Poln Oj �\ Lake REGIONAL �' 16 PARK RECEIVED „e RESERVE Preliminar P1 ns JUN 14 ## =d o� G o Y L r d for SITE o s Plat, ♦Site Grad in Erosion Control �� ♦ ♦ ®� ® '= h'OODBURY Utilities and Langsicape ° (Not toScole) for Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota Sheet List Table Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 Cover 2 Site Context 3 Existing Conditions Prepared for: 4 ExistingConditions NO. DATE REVISION SHEETS Lennar Corporation 5 Existing Conditions 1 0 /1 /13 Review Per City Comments All 6 Preliminary Plat Plan 2 0 6/14/13 Review Per City Comments All 7 Preliminary Plat Plan 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 8 Preliminary Site Plan AL 9 Preliminary Site Plan Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 10 Preliminary Site Plan — Town Home Area 11 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan Contact: Steve Ach 12 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan Phone: 952-249-3033 13 Preliminary Utility Plan NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION • 14 Preliminary Utility Plan is Details 16 Details 17 Details 18 Preliminary Street Profiles Pre pared b 19 Preliminary Street Profiles Preliminary Plans P y- 20 Preliminary Street Profiles W Westwood ProfenlonatServiamlr- 21 Preliminary Street Profiles for 7699 Anagram Drive ECee Prairie,MN55344 22 Preliminary Landscape Plan Plat, Site, GradinyyQQI Erosion Control, PHONE 952-937-5150 23 Preliminary Landscape Plan Utilities and 1- 91cape FAX 952-9375822 TOLLFREE 1-888-937-5150 for WeStvvwd wwwv emw wp&c Savona Project number: 0000565.00 Lake mta.eta Contact.Ryon M Bluhm Date: 03/28/13 Sheet: 1 of 23 20121161CVPOI d, 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Coll 45 Hours before digging 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance / �Cv:fG A7$ 2 D 1 A.,[3. I I 11STONEGATE/ I I GUIDED { r SUBDW SION J� f R3/LDR i I -\�-- d --- - ...... 1 I > I I EXCEPTION I i t GUIDED — J PROPOSED R3/LDR — — — R3/LDR • ZONING / A -------- ------------------------ ^ x P I / I j GUIDED R4MUC .I RO 08 r GUIDED { � R4MUBC _ f I ! } I t t \ I • (� I t t GUIDED HC It L I \ l I ! a I <� \ i}, ♦ OVIDED HC I r ( � It 11 ------------R-60AY COMMERCIAL) I 1 I PROPOSED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY GUIDED I D R4 COMMERCIAL I $ ,IlIMERCIAL 00147 18 I i 11 t i� ✓� J ---------- ��--- -- _-- -.---- - -- ro :ac ="_'ter---� ---- =--- � -----------------------------� . _ 7AI.NC hK AY 94 I 0' 200' 400' 600' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 201211e1WP01 dwg D.w 03/28/13 sh•e 2 of 23 . w..t—.d nor.v—I s«.4a wtr. Pre?ared for. Savona 9w- ai e sv 0! wM Gtv Cwd: am Lennar Corporation Site ContextPHONE 96393'7 III D- HW raa 96]-99-s.az 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 routxE>= raess-1. Craig W.Morse,RIS a.md nm.i-M/du. westwWood D— 06/14/13 ru. .r xa ?�1 Plymouth.Minnnesota.55446 Lake Elmo.Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc o d LEGEND N paj N O O urjm�c J°pp'IXG ^ Qyy BUSH/SH RUB 0 N0.0 0e1 ~N + CONIFEROUS IRff II --- -_---- -------------------- ---- d M ¢W DECIDUOUS TREE Pi w Z WETLAND - O ® STEEL/WOOD POST c_,a o. I _ n a u I SIGN-7RAFFIC/OTHER vo- c S. A. SfGN-7RAFFfC/OTHER C. H. 19 ! ® MAIL BOX I lA+n,^ In+r.rnnl r<n„nlr.r er,. u+Av -nry+ r r,r- i Av ��+ r n+ v-1 v l rrn Jf7r+v 7lLJ+r L lJrv+ I FN vF7Yr�l i�f 7FTI vi rr + P L. + Iv r. L I C HANDICAPPED STAIL I v _ _ - _ _ — — — ___- G, P£RC TEST a•----------- _ q��— _�_ — u0miraRMG WELL © CABLE Tv BOX M GAS METER '! Z -- ------------- T STREET LITE GUY WIRE a \ STORM MANHOLE 1 yTCj z I: \ v+ ❑Q 1 TELEPHONE BOX 1 f F E9 I V S J h Z p u t2 \ «M \` TELEPHONE MANHOLE N TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX Z B HAND HOLE i G _ W \ m - Iep a S u O \\° \\ \ -�- TRAFFIC LIGHT .Z Ofr N� S Q ca rom 00 p W W \ \ 1 I J m77 K o 1>1 \\ i DG GATF VALVE m rn 45.00 HYDRANT <C� b aaOr~.� qq \� \\\ \� WA PER METER dm t. 0. OZ _ �� co q !4 \ \ a0 U I ..) IX - rl \ \ \ I © CURB STOP BOX o. 4 O 4 \\ \\ \ ® WATER MANHOLE I m W N i' \ _ \ \ I 0 WELL 00 0In ° -erp- CABLE 7v n ` \ N !^ \ a \\ \\ \\ GAS LINE r,-9 �' i v a \\ \\ \ ' -paw- POWER OWRHE40 I 56.86 c< \ �\ \ a POWER POLE G--------- 1 \ ® £LfC7AM BOx T----------- ------------ f f c e n N a v - - 5929 o z ELECTRIC METER E I \ \\ \\ ELECTRIC MANHOLE Lj N<+ I \\ \ \ -I ® ELECTRIC TOWER j PtN z a ® SANITARY MANHOLE m c o o m ` m e I \\ \\ \\ SEWER C[EANOUT O ` a 0 N BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN V o I CATCH BASIN I a \\ \�/ ° 4 FLARED END SECTION c o CONCRETE SURFACE I "�- "�► `o N b W i N \\ a -'aI p -qv-- POWER UNDERGROUND FFII M` pp O .,c 1; \\ ��� _�p� y N N s O -SAM- SANITARY SEWER vQ i o rn o M.a -sro- STORM SEWER '-� 7500 <" Z ]— TELEPHONE OVERHEAD ° TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND Um P\ Z6' C~ Or 000 - c na wa)= WAIERMALN I I- .5 u o o FENCE LINE Ld 111 111 _ '`' ;ynn l O W C o o W m I �i r o ""^ DECIDUOUS TREE LINE I I 1 M w t U n C 1 I Z 0.00 CONIFEROUS TREE LINE I`I Iq F o o a w°i°n \ + CURB k GUTTER W I ` In W3'�'t \ "','1 S BITUMINOUS SURFACE O - - _ -----� - 'l 50.00 N ! I mo 2527om ! I om 00 W i 10O' 200' I NOTES: Call 48 Hours bar°re digging: 81 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY&CONDITIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM Common on round=118 �.COR1 2D1211 afEKPa1 dwg AN ALTA SURVEY COMPLETED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL Common Ground Alliance SERVICES ON OCTOBER 29, 2012. �k 03/28/13 Sheet 3 OP 23 w.n."ooa profinerwl se+ylo.r,RKfteparW. Etlen 1'raine,MN Ssia6 ac..a_.W,p.Y.wwo ed rWa l9es.er r d...ab ee..a ulNO aveverce O0S6//1le]/IJ}RReees�ieee Pps.r G011yY CCmMnvmneenntlet - o�.JarB Tor. Savona Lennar Corporation Existing _ PHONE 95293)-5169 Cring w.Mont,R►s ..� �/ Conditions 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Westwood ReRw.r,RYEMoeap:mm °- 06/14/13 Lie Na 23021 1 Plymouth, Minnesota,55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota o2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc LEGEND a BUSH/SHROB Wt N CONIFEROUS TREE w 41III ! I - DECIDUOUS IRE£ i 4 p ! } - o N > VEnANO A� — —•—•——•— — ~_ -�--- � ���_ 0 STEEL/HOOD POST 50.00 a p ! 2527 L11 I v SIGN-TRAFFIC/0 RI£R Or 4i Ijl J. ,I ; ; z U _s 1 W m P o Z IIIri L'I` v Q y I a S a° -a� SIGN-7RAFFLC'/OTHER u M X� p G LJ [ I O ti u 7 ® MAIL BOX HANDICAPPED STALL a aEi i a O 4 I ) J a C PERC TEST _ «U 0 MONITORING N£LL I ZN ON � 16.AA _ _ u_ n o 4P I CABLE CAE TV BOX In 9 •�•� { 1 GAS METER Em SP I �M� .o a _ a E «1 r� I'' `!1 M 1 b rn-u •j STREET LITE «E ed 1/f a Z_ « ^ i{ ;wcg GUY WRE I o a e O� S m ` W s Lj y T ?1 O a u ® STORM MANHOLE C Ir I"`o ^o t C •` c O^$ I 'y I I p p T� TELEPHONE BO% P20 W G 7i V7 7FLEPHONE MANHOLE a ON I O O O ` V •. .•< t /r'�u L P tY�. 1 o >' p '` r:' is A TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX o .°�.'rn I c p ` a �- ;./// C h« �� 1 8 NANO HOLE TRAFFIC LIGHT r E W z1=2 I r1l I T$ CC GATE VALW C E 01i ®' HYDRANT WATER METER N '�� C7 LURE STOP BOX to ( y ,«_,.i Q J (•I V o O^ N ��i� � ©� Q 1 I �^l I L i m o ® WATER MANHOLE $ § t N j, ciz ` -•i1 _. �� $o c°1 —M— CABLE TV - LI j ` ®©' ��— -- sCI 2 OU o —vs— GAS LINE —PVF- POWER OVERHEAD - VI 9 o POIKR POLE `` e ^ � ��- 1 ❑[ FELECTRICBOX I N w ! N O y c n m ELECTRIC METER 1 ppW N V,U�Q E- r•) U.1 ELECTRIC MANHOLE f C ` O Lo 7 �I u N W'y F ® ELECTRIC TOWER 1 4 m , ` d t m I Y ®S SANITARY MANHOLE 53 a w ` o cg o o - EaC E °B SEH£R CLEANOu7 NOS Ga bN I I O a :E ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN I g xN Zug •o o ` a oz' c3 `o I Iv tZ/1 .. _O CATCH BASIN -� 1 -• 005L « o,�) o a FLARED END SEC770M Z 3� f I m z mc� + Z 7 r Z u CAv 'U LC y m LULL N CONCRETE SURFACE% C u POWER UNDERGROUND W o_. Oa30 ton 4O «po tt Uc I c w I v a o u I C 1p —P— SANITARY SEVER c u —s,r STORM SEVER 1 mob �dE a c z .. •o I 3 A — TELEPHONE OVERHEAD 1 Z o TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND 7 i c« I o� —mr— WATERMAIN __ DECIDUOUS TREE LINE Ir CONIFEROUS TREE LINE In I LIII •—• 1 O CURB&GUTTER '' [§S BITUMINOUS SURFACE O � 1 IN 1 n O our , 1 _n_sa ~ L O ! j m - ------�--------- 100' 200' 300' NOTES: Coll 48 Hours before digging' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION t. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY & CONDITIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM Common on round 1.COm zottn OFxPaza g AN ALTA SURVEY COMPLETED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL Common Ground Allionce SERVICES ON OCTOBER 29. 2012. D.le: U3/28/13 Sbeet: 4 OF 23 EPF)6AdH.9%Oa9 NwMPEo,oBBAn,PB.BBrm,oS5M 22/OH.AAn rs31rslrI)or 5-l6uAB1 l]5 SB3B rWAa Inc esm B>,..e..ge,s rH.l.,dIs wer A eB.rp..I.B.I..Me.o epd..yp u.e.sa grd rTA Ha.o m am v qaraa lO�teS•Y le�e )Umnw if � Pepfor. Savona � QJ Existing ,/I1 1�13 BBw..B r�GY � RIM Lennar Corporation Conditions nsQ— HW 16W5 36th Avenue North Suite 60 rou aso Craig W Mo ,RS a `�1�` Plymouth, Minnesota,554 Lake Elmo,MineBota W`estwodwWwooft— De 06/1" L,_ r 2021 02013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc. .. � . � I LEGEND i _ _ - �- - -�A�- --�- ��-- - ® ® �— " -—--—- ,—.- .—.�._..---�--'_r _ _ P __—__ iz BUSHIsHRUB 9b I I CaI —•—• o O a # CONFEROUS TREE m E DECIDUOUS TREE 8 c u`v n VI Vr ,o < o� +� W£TLANO m cJ g 2 i a 111 E a E I �w = f o c � z`U- Z oa ® srEEt/xoDD Posr $ 1 as ~a^ { xW , - 8 N O C Z O�_ `o u 1 W a LD a N t Pit! t o m � r^ m SIGN-TRAFFIC/01HER v~I cM Z. � r P I`\ ggfg� q u Ery I_Q SIGN-7RAFFIC OTHER 4 O lVrlr cmi E I I o 0 a I n ` ,�„"'m W a U j 10 R 1� i 0 o ® MAIL BOX 111 1 1 L`L O U� I d� n � o,N � HANDICAPPED STALL 11 o.�a I a oZ 1 mm D PERC TEST �•— -t•y 3 t ® MONf70RING N£LL t L O c m m- m Q E y 9 y t{ ' Co V11-Z g p CABLE 7V BOX 0 - 1 D Q 1 z im z w F I ' �m c r I U oO p GAS METER y L Q e I Z w F I 3 N V ' VI �. � I � '� STREET UTE L I ,in Building _ n Cur etRE O I I .2.N j m , A �l *® STORM MANHOLE f 1 NrOg m R a O TELEPHONE BOX TELEPHONE MANHOLE ry� I u Z TRAFFIC CONTROL BOX I Q a m HOLE HAND r)4 y Oa Grass Airp1je Land,na Strip TRAFFIC LIGHT \ - --- ------ - -------------- ono---r- I i—_____ _`> a 3— C m� j LJ l•� CG GAlE VALVE z o A _ � HYDRANT J ' Y¢ u W 7L t `u. y�fi WATER METER U Z Y06 CURB STOP BOX Z / N 5 4 a ' �Q 4grb r l` o G u Z OZ 43.1 >,� I I / ® WATER MANHOLE'ter ¢ti I 4 I Q yw v=� d °I m4 "'l _. 0 -" _ ..` O W O 1 O o fH I w a VOi m Y oD v I •E �o sso ! w I v co - �' -___ I —I — CABLE TV N p W I ' _ Q /,w / N —WS_ GAS LIFE p N Y I 1.80 N 'N•�J Lon 0' G.6 g � � J ! Y O 2 'I a A —oa+— PON£R OVERHEAD CNi x I c ai I m E ( ay "n' 'I I `v Z f I N w .O' POWER POLE N l3 u N h 1 1 .ki cw N ELECTRIC BOX .Q m o. © O 3 Y I I £ a '{E n v $ 4i, n '^'' I _ I ELECTRIC METER ` 0 ELECTRIC MANHOLE 1 I o[n on o CL V `[ --�— ® ELECTRIC TOWER N I f j SM m m 0 SANITARY MANHOLE U o"o ';�.. - "[" o $ 2 N OC a '• r•' M ® SEVER CLEANOUT �.aN Ce 1 a_uN W V / \�•� '� ''� p } `uf .•Go C 6 4' Va�i a 31 t G q N� o w I o 4 e ^'� I '�•'•� '" E N RI C C C � y� i ' �O1 ® BEEHIVE CATCH BASIN O CATCH BASIN c O m v' '� Q N c; L� I Q FLARED ENO SECTION �''"'' ZZ V m ; �, W W ,..�', CONCRETE SURFACE c o a AS , n �� I m - _ I � n I N -I- ,. —vur� POa£R UNOERCROUNO JI I '' SANITARY SEWER 67500 STORM SEefR r� TELEPHONE OVERHEAD —pIr TELEPHONE UNDERGROUND t i �• I•^ C, I z ^, C0 W —WT WATERMAIN 07 I o —•—•— FENCE LONE N o I i I ��,�/ �`�• _ ~p Q -Ili Q I w ,w-•+K- DECIDUOUS TREE LINE CONIFEROUS 1R£E LINE CURB @ lV1JCR 4 I `-7 h Q -f C L I me �f.,`�jn BIrUMIN0U5 SURFACE •�° _< O I h Q� O I c` 0 00 � o a 100' 200' 300' NOTES: Call 8114orOurs before cal1811.com1n9 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161EXP03dwg 1. EXISTING TOPOGRAPHY do CONDITIONS WERE OBTAINED FROM Common Ground Alliance AN ALTA SURVEY COMPLETED BY WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL Date 03/28/13 she.c 5 op 23 SERVICES ON OCTOBER 29, 2012, NA,awoW Rdadm.l&"M W_ It-m� Prepared for. Savona gEMP,2499 4n•9rrn arlY� dbrt NpePYM M+E r,a.y 8rri uNo MVRaI DPtll�ed: CLI`�. 04/1�/,3 Pyr.,r 9.Gly Cvnmml• Existing aW WY Lennar Corporation PHI r 952-937-4159 PA9 B52A3� p,,s ,,, Conditions 7aL r>:E� 1=_931_5- cis W.Morse,M 16305 36O Avenue North Suite bOD weS*UIOOd 9„9.a9�aw9dP9mm D_ 06/14/13 �9 2302I s°�°i�"i°`°f/406 Plymouth,Minnnesota,55496 Lake Elmo,Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging 99 9 ` I 811 or =11811.com � \ / Common Ground Alliance 1 (A.AY(Nr II II II 11 11 II II - r I II II II II II 11 II II L__'_°__J sll sll sll sll sll sll sll e 6 or rwa r_____- I 1 II 2 II 3 II 4 II 5 II II 7 II 8 II 9 2 I II II II II II II II II EXCEPTION L JL� JL-, JL' JL JL JL JL� -i -I r 11- -�lr-� n;�� ---,I1_se_,Vr-------/ — 1 / 3 I s 2 3 \ yl} 11 d / w I----__ � r�°--Ir_-s--17�Z-1 r- -11-�-1 f-�-_1 6 -I II II 11 5 / )^ 8 }} 9 I{ 1 1 I I IL -J L� J!1 �/ //' \ \\ }1 /i/ 8 r 4 10, 8 1 1 7 11 6 11 5 I I 4 I 3 I 2 I I 1 a�� L /.°i// �-a �av I� III sll sll SII 4II sll 359 I I' II II I -II II ! zo m9 ( 7 / \ rL-------- rL---------- r -1 r ] I � 12 p -I 10J IIr f< 1I 1I lrl -- /- DUTLOTG6 I8h1 12 4 9 2 3 4 5 II I 13 11 / I II II II ii L---r1 / /� /, <\ \\\ II �\ 1 I L�� --+zl Ilx `! �� J 14 L 1 I L__J L.—a JL__J �- r--�r---tr--�r-rs-Ir- 1r 1f \ � ✓ , � \ `\\ JL---�� I �� / r- 1 1 I I II I I II 2 11 11 \ 10 > 1 _ I Is I is s I 17 II 1I I I _1? ,r \ '\ __2I4 16 15 I 1 14 11 ,-_,-----1 14 11 1I -- JL J L s-JL z_J LemJ L -- i7 I I I �..\J / / ^ �-- \\STREET B 4 ) 1 _JL \\ �:;� 2L-- --ter -tr°S1r' -1 e1 \ I I I I I I I I I I } } 5 1 1 I I 2 I I 3 4 5 I 6 l \\ 7 1 r' - \ II II II I I `II \ `yam-t_�'��^ r�-�-�`/ � �rw l� I \�.i��•2 � \-'"'0 f� J 5_s__J h II II II II J`Q`��a - 6 � n _J L J L J L J� �-�'� r„3 . 'ad JAI 6 a e-e L-----J ao eer ' 1 OUTLOTO1 ---5 - >I :> r'''•o9 1 L-___-=_J 140 _J 4 1 OUTLOTF r--. -, \ 8 , 4 r- 10 > 6 / C OUTLOTE `v OUTLOTF , ^e � / 11 / 1 t• a --t� \ \ � v f I J r I OUTLOT M E r gp[M•l1 I 0' 100' 200' 30C NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161PSP01 dwg vace 03/28/13 shae 6 of 23 Wr,wocd I W11— bn.b,�a ar No--'4 4 4 ✓s w R Prepared for. Savona )69B Ana9,am orire mne•'9•'•1�me We I...eery"_ ,calla 6V8VHYQ DedoYd: _- Emn Pr•HI..MHaar•• �.�-.d�•�.d - m,lrh'3 e•we..o„C=;' Lennar Corporation Preliminary Plat 9e/1ah3 a•..e.w Cnr canmaH• CLec4.4 !alas aHOHE 86]Aa)-al6D 1. 96RA3r-6s3t HW" 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Pan raurPr£ ,aes9.r-e,ao Craig W.Morm RIS Remd om L-b fdeee Westwood , WMI.ronp..Wa, D� 06114A3 xo 23021 Plymouth,M nnnesota,55446 lake Elmo,Minnesota e2013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance I ,awxr � 1 •sR1d -----------------------_-----------------_--------------------------------------------------------------2583 OUILOT B w ,-0MP LASNENt u_ -zs_ a I I i1 I I 14- I I I I -z I I I -7z L - c - 1- - r- I r----- ----- -------I------- -- -------- ------- C---- -/7, \------------------------------------------------------ ------ 1 1 =I1II1I SII II sIlIl III II $IIII $IIII SIIII II II II I1- L � r \ I ---- -1---------- 811 Ell ! < + 7 3 8 2 11 3 II 4 5 6 7 8 I 9 II 10 11 6 II 11�r � II II 11 iJt 0 1 ? 4L II II -fL C�_JL / 9 17 3 10 8 1 I 7 11 6 11 5 11 4 11 3 11 2 11 1 1 2 _f0__J 8 1! \ R� •aRMR 9 I 1 11 j112 11 11 tta I L l 3 I � a / \$ ` \v \ i\\ : : L, JL— JLJ -------9 ----J 2 r-- r---1 r--1 r------7 / 2\\\ r \ I 1 ++ \>� 10 I I I1 II r OUTLOTO ^ ! \\ \. \� ;FNSTREET 12 aII 14 r /`�e ) \ �� L� \. \ > J L J -a ✓ (��;`b` � •a rr �^ � \ .\b ✓ ems" .�, � o �J � I l � �\6 rrr s// ! r -Z� \+ `\\ ` v R0" gib• 5. w I 13 2 12 14 , . b :.I Lr � ,r•r/ 1 /\�,� / ---.,-- ! � - bt 7,s "3'0 /2 � r_= 6 _, wU I 5 12 `—w' — —`1 L-----J b e 5 L ~ 01I7LOT K O�MOT L OUMOT E 2r `6�\�7 1 4�\ • '`- 8J 5e J,0 9 3 i7 _�! _ �ql� lg, _ _ J OU7LOT M \� 1254 � I I I � I - - — — — — — — — — — — — — — — -- I � I 0' 100' 200' 300' {I— NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121187P5P02 dwg Dace 03/28/13 sheet 7 oe 23 Prepared Savona d*'—D a mat R^V0'• for. ��. E—P-11.,,MR ssxa ee. �^'•°��'�'°� - 95/,1/,l R..v.P.r•11 C9mnm,• Preliminary Plat ��.�3°•�•••���'•��M.,,• � � Lennar Corporation �' PHONE 9-911— TMM 95°931.59Y1 �� �TM Pan ouE» a9o-9v-st59 iS W.M—,Ill 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 WH$ t1 ww9MWOO xb-dp i— m- 06/14/13 [rem.N, 23021 n®d�'�0`b/�` Plymouth, Minnnesota,55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota o2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 99� 9 811 or cal1811.com J \ / Common Ground Alliance Development Data: 7 1 J L7oxa Site Area/Calculated to Cl of 5th Street). 1&2.6 oc -----------------o--__----------_-__--------_-__---------_----_-_----------_------------------ Mulle Family Res:olenbWr 20.82 x. Ouf of M. - .4aw EASLLEwr CWlector Rood/5th STREET)ROW. 120 ac „ u i _ S:ngte Fomay Port:m 60Y a. --- ---- _ Mwt,Fom;ry Porfion. 1 93 ac 958 `I aas- I „ 1 T T - -- I I - 1 -- I I - I - I I - I - Ouflol M Pwhon 4.11 oc gyp >J.o 73a a >0 Tao >aa 73p Perlr Oed;dat— 6.1 ae L- ^'rp--J `J n.ew N 9 rases al. I rases N3 I,asoo rr41 1143oa N. ,asw N.1 rases erg l I rases Ng I I ras9>, (0ut.,i A&F and had port m of E) g',6ISB>u _ I 1 a 1 4 I 5 I 6 17 8 1 1 9 a•yr m rt-' PARKICRE£NWAY r- -1 1 2 Other de. Ooen Sande: 16.62 oc EXCEPTION 2 I I �s I ' (I �s I I �� I I S.91,F�Ijy ers Psp�g &otne open spaces) T6.6f oc raswN L -..3L JL JL JL JL JL JL JOpen (0utlais B,C,D.E.G N) h sr ���-� - `- Al -Fanoy OP.-Space, 10.a*oc N r r (Outats L J.K.L net arrrote streets&driveways) N I I 2 I 3 — A71a NM1 ,LIST al ri , rA,Ir 6 I r Liur - 7- - �-- - �- Nt Drme Ames• 8f.3\ 8 9Lrw J III -5ngfe Fomay net area(net ROW,Park.&O Spxe) 631I,I 6I 5 I Q .? I 2 1 -Mot;-Family net area(net parading 065 as&ROW)182Y ac -7 dv I "' �n,osm I L a rls.rP I ra>Mo g I,asao N g I asro N g rasao N@ I I rasoo arg n.us.++r Prmea.d mere F Iry t°tr. 789 bfs 35q 55'wide,140'deep tA-0f 96 ohs 1 frr• } —��� `� tares �}�T r>s 'a L rM-_J r .q , 1 I I I I I I I ! 75'wide>140'deep typ,aW 93 rots 4— " ' ��/ \ 1._ r ras9a NXl L� JL J -JL--� --u 'L J m r_ /\ 5 - - u - - -7- -f� Prmesed MWt/F sv Unrfa 712 names L 1O J (- '7 --) ROW Tawnhomes 44 homes 1 •� I 1 \ •`� e rs r -- r--1 ---- -7 Sock-Back Townhomes 7B names r °$ I I I I sat sao 7 !I / \�\ i\� tar rr' L --J .L AD 7sa >o I I I I / Overall Prmesed Xamssr Jit homes 1 I 2 I 3 Q 5 6 an.zla.r 113„ .l / \ iK� 1r 6 I �Lxns+l 18 ,o.aee,lg 12 811aaeaNRll 14 i/ OU7LOTG �n.as,N n.a i o �,Llls.r aeo,r "II oaeax pass Densiry s.•r �,r ao 9w•e° _ I per+' 1 l I / °u.eev N /K .\, <\ a N ra-- -Srngle PomNy Gross 0enstty 206 un/oe ��✓" J` / � J e-n� -Nest;Fom4y cross Density 566 an/oc 71 -,MWtId ms; / sI (arall)hemas Oty 2Tua/"„ n az N � Fa-ly Net De..;ty 670u/oc PF Family 0—loommt Standards: 25' 16 Side Setback.(sente oNow) 7$/73'(1$'total) See Setback Lafi)I J kd111 Revr Setback. 20' L -J Lo Area. 9'10sf 17 0 '1,250Y t Fnv D..«mm«,e Standard,- 2 n. s N r rm 1 /� \ /.O razs,.r 1 r Regarree Sife Area per umt: 4.000 sf A—valed Gross Site Area per unl 7.426 of II II II II 55 I 1 5 a � � � V raev � 9 1 I 2 3 I 4 Ira&a N Aft"..us Ce.erae...raa1 ee.r L 1,a1sa N I I rw,rg 1 rw.rg j 1.ere NS I I n I Asoa N ` Mo,lmum Impervwus Coverage: SOT r� J � L 1\rgao N / I �\V.n .`,•2 �� � .r�+ 1 L � S STr9 r�o �I I Proposed/mpernous Coverage 439 I I 9 pen Sp Re aped 0 ace Per unit 500 sl r \ „6 � L� r,o3 A>31,1� � r>5 r� � AI00 N I •( 9.>M,r � 1- Pronded Open SD°ce Per unit 1570 sl (Oullats 11 L J.K.L IeI..private streets&dnvrs/122) \ 1 P� `� 1•, 1 Au N e e 3 -7 \ L f „5r �� C J 7 \ \• maa RRowehadka x ams) 25 K..fa Ave 50'to structures o Aan al - Na a-tar rasa- r E qna N 1 r ,oa s ,eo 5th Sfreef Cdl.W 40'to structures 1 1 OUTLOT D „ a 1 1 L -- J =1 o F \ a Ad/Jcent Property 30' „ SV—(,on-8w0dn9 to 8u0dm9 25'typ P, to 0—Sheet weth 24'1)p(bb) `4s `� ti. I ,awe N r �a L -i ,ao , o asu N r a y Pi;wfe ONsroy Len9rn 22 min.24'typrcol W An dg setback to prrv°te street(s,de) 10'min \ r L 1 .esz N J C An5r rl V , J„ 1 / Off-street Cvest Pa409 ar°vded 025 per unit "_',tint r ble. _ ? � 1 Name Use Oenersh/p Si:e �\ OUTLOTE 0 Outof A Greenwoy/Pork City 3.75 a raaaa.o !'_ �\ bho 6 \ / / 1 Outlaf e £smt/Open Space HOA 153 ac Outat C Pond/Open Space City 5.66 oc Outlof E Pond/Open Space City 495 oc 1 \ O wa ;i / � ,aria / / t'C/ .oath ♦v ,aoss.r� 8 raaaerUi y � � � � 1 h R=lo00.00 / / \ )' \ / l 8 �V v \J / oufar F Pork Cdy 2.00 oa 1 1 L=27243 r .ry 1 9 \ /� ra1�, Oulbf G Open Space R0A 2.IJ tic 1 1 T=73Z07 C�/7ZOT o.mear JL� I r 1 / q1 outal tr Open Space HCA 0.77 Rc oataf i P-o/Open space Gty 147 oc 1 1 C8=N68°4T18"W y sNaw \ ' \ F�L , 0.to J Open Space NOA 252 or 689 Typical Lot Detail 11 IPI S7A-47+27— (rw) y� a \ 0.M° �/\ �< °° oar raga- 9 sT"') OCR Ourar K Oaen space ROA 062 ac c a 3 S ti r11R1 Outa!L Pone crry 06?ac 7e r aa' lame N / Data!M Futare DevNoprnerlt others 6SB9 65_/75. ac ia.a e2r, Development Notes X - 1 1 /i f3 1 f ti r— = �/ 'rb\ V T. ALL LOT DIMENSIONS ARE ROUNDED TO THE NEAREST FOOT I \ 1 fs L` I' 1 \\ 10 `,� Drainage d• ?. ALL AREAS ARE ROUNDED TO 7H£NEAREST SQUARE F007 Utddy£vsemenl \ 1 I U \ \ se\ h 3 STREET NAMES ARE SUBJECT TO APPROVAL BY 7H£CITY, �-Setback Lrne 1 y y� 7 � 4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL 8E PROVIDED AS REQUIRED. b 1 1 'L •tt DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS WILL BE PROVIDED OVER ALL PUBLIC -t - La,Ovnensmn 1 1 �'v°°,w7aa.°h„rnesT�=-�/ 4,4 27 U77LITIES. BLANKET DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER THE EN77RE 9,100 sf, 1 L Lot Nurnbe• 1 1 OUTLOT M ✓2 `'`tom OUTLOT TO BE PROVIDED ON FINAL PLAT FOR ALL OF OUTLOT A THROUGH 1 1 1i + h 29 26 OUTLOT L Lot Area 1 1 'I , — 11 11 s•srrou� i°srxeIVF C2 R=820.00 5 STREET IMDTHS SHOWARf FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB. L-978.30 1 1 >2�r 7=556.82 6 SIDE SETBACKS OF 75'& 75-(75- TOTAL)REPRESENTS THE AVERAGE L —65„ — J CH=921.30 OF CODE REQUIRED 5'& 10"(15' TOTAL) SETBACKS. ' 75' B 1 1 1 o� 6=6802123" 0' 100' 200' 300 STREET 11€� `� >n; y4E,. COS -29+04.1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 1` 1 Pl STA�29+04.16 20121161PPP01.dw9 Date 03/28/13 Sh-t 8 of 23 W Vi.*.,.d K em Of.nWre—'s.M in db.e,aPw,id,m awe 1®�aa®d IAMa$[1tV 14Y� aaeA,/, R eNr,Pr Cemm,nt+ },la�eatti TiMa ed fr. Savona e&n PrelrN,M 3 3 oaG> , Lennar Corporation Preliminary Site PHONE sszas7saso Plan F7a1 -Sala r°u Faa� 9S2-W7,am-wasaso are*W.Maree,RLS 16°A,5 36 , Mir innnNorth Suite(ice Westwood wwe wa—adp— ❑• 06/14/13 Lk—N. 23021 �°Csewlaa aft Plymouth, csota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota c,2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hours before digging. 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance I �nm �sna ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -----------------�1 OUTLOT B i ` Ts_ .1.L L 1L 1 -- L r>L uy i.°xP rwsnrcrr I - -- -- -- - -- L — - - F—_ — ———— r ---1-�------ ---- --—r -- -- ---- -- -- -- ----- -- I \ ------------ ----7 3 r 1 M 5 I / 1 l • w,r 9 I rosac a31 I raso9,r:_ msav a13 raso9.r.I I+osro a: I rasa°✓S I rasac,/41 I+as9)r17 I n.1eJ:r- I^��" l h L rro ( � � p 1 7 I 8 }/ \\ r I Q I I 3 14 5 16 1 7 1 1 8 I I .91 OUlLOT C J` 'O 9 \ ew'Jw sr �' 7 nss?a ! / IV °" �..--sue +e.ry,r .pp n zrur, C i' G 5 ?e.�` \ CS R=82000 I � / T=268.27 ` —1 r 1L r r 1L-1 ro».sa 0a CH=043.91 I I 6=38 44'18" 00°" II 6I 5 I 4 3 II 2 1 \ " CB=S70°3751'W I \ +asm,l aso 2 / \ P1 STA= +22.44 I 8 —J I�a+1s,r�l( BI Ir g asw,r 41 Irosm al4 Irasa°a91I n.roJa � ' \ " ) r• v /\ rLIrSa1 \� � �'� �/ 'Ba �� f rrsrsar 1Z o•mr I ,�,vsattauw aSCO aln I L•.--]S—r L J ——J L——��——� _ J L 1 Lee]al � 0. / C 6 � � � a i a'9+Ou[arM.` `— r eY OWr9a I rrP i 41 17 ---- I no I I I azae,l \ •� seas,l /\ 6 2 STREET'. ' OUTL?�T G — ra1 L I I I J I aee rr . /\ C s AJaa,l �\ 6 a,,, • �� rrw! O 3 . �v s f 3.paEa I 4 ' /� °� L o JJ L -_7,° � �\ rzaJo a I ♦ >sr 11 2 \ rues., ,( Y� .8 rrs) /� , \ of �W8 � �/ Aee:ar ♦ r_ L ! I� ;aa n n I r� ` r l A r Ill \\�i / / \ • 1 1~1 _ — /0` OV rLOT M L i 1. �r S \� OUMOT H 6 E •a1a�+fa r ,� _ _ C4 Typical Lot Detail tM i • I Ti a (uo 5cae) 1. E' ,� �. 9 �� •� I ' ,o inlay£°semem — Lot t)rmenslon m.cu r I I r'I Oj17LOT K 9.100 — Lot Number r J 1 ',9 \ zvxveo,r r I � rar y'0 1 / C3 R=1000.00 11 — ! Lat Areo rAaae r � 91 / 9, / -y.snaeccn L=363.40 _ 9. OkOT L IL X OInLOT E `.tl� lrwl T=1B3.73 Prr se x f �.,j - - !a,rJa ar arxlso,l CH=361.40 "� I — ,6=200 49'17' - - - r i7 �3 I 65' S' o ranee, / CB=S61604'14'W 4r,- 2 T fp Pi _ 7 1 PI STA=18+22.34 , 3 a r I 0i (7 2� STREET i 7 _�r I e d 8- 9_r OUTLOT M I B 41 ago 14 41 aAJ 14 4 I B _ — — — oG \ 110 i •'v.ieriW>__ ro �> iw9p14ER C4 R=820.00 1=289.38 T=146.27 I �j sae CH=28788 I 1{ • 6=20*13,10' C8=561°22YTW P!STA=11-F75.44 Ir ' -s'swarnoEn I � I . f 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION - 20127161PPP02 Erg Dart 03/28/13 Shoat 9 OF 23 >69"'"9�E"°Ord—w5 k"h. ra..bl�,�,�.�,�,.�..�_s�.., Savona m.o-.9p..�a=a a,.+...eory um.a wm svAvaraA w"�` n.Ea*aa Prepared for. "• EWn Pralrle,Yr653H W Lennar Corporation Preliminary Site PHorE 9aa-9�r-„aa Plan FM 9a--Seal �� aur,r� raeavar.s,ea Cnig W.Mmse,RLS 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Westwood rrrrverw.....dhuoar 13� 06/14/13 ,.., 23021 RAM"earaae, Plymouth,Minmesota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging. \ v 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance r \ n A `\ 6 5TH STREET ` JJJ I \. / 16 /' \\ \\ \\\\ /// 0�1 A6�55 .. Pronased MWh-Fam!/v Dew.4oamenf Sfandnrds I / ----- 5 --ACT 40'i SBx Rapuved Ate Areo pn unrt 4.000 sf Provided Gross Site A—per unit 7,426 st Imnervfows Coseroae. 14 Maximum I.PN_.Cveroge SOX Proposed fmpe v; Cornage. 43X Remrkaa,ents. Reps,,d Open Spoce Per unit 500 sf 50 Prarided Open Space Per untl. 3.570 s/ __- SBK (Oufbfs I&J less pr7ro(e streets k W,✓es/777) r l l \ , \/ , \ fsrooased selAack:i k,tmumsl: 75' Keatsft A.eROW 50'fo structures l 1 } I� \\ \ - \ \� // N / / `r \ ```i•'' ,", ` 51h St COKactor 40'to structures Adjocent Property JO' G�V SepwaGon-Building fo Buddnq 75'ttp tn 24'to ��/ -O� / \ \ •t+t'' N 1 PAwfe Dr v Y LengfA 22'- (s 24 Itprcal \\ / / (\\ IIIIQ' Min hldg seth"k to pn ote street(side) 70'mM Off-street Cuest Porkmg Provided 075 per uNf f \ \ NX — 1'--------� I OUTL OT H / -- \ . 6 I Typical Multi-Family Lot Details ,4 4.-' PAT1O, -PATIO., 1 9 2 r n 4' 3-' h / t; �OUTLOT l �w �- ' 2 e ``¢"� P'' ?'�°' \ I Rn cF A r ti e 7 a s '"�f°�' '1 fat• -- k10 3 3 CLWCRETF SIDEWALK I 8 / TRL ET-! ' --20'RADWS N I 1 (T1P) OUTLOT L J n 2f , ! n I 3 - ---1 -- 7 2 6 I 1 1 - - 7 ;4 I } r 2;, I r 4� 2� r+2 2 r�2 - - I _3_Z Z M 31 31 �; ,g 3' I6 Jr -- -- n - - - - 6 14 4 - -- 6g - - 14 + 4 , ' a -- - -- ---- - -- - -- -- - ---°r —ExTR £A � ur TOo BE VACATEDA7ED I 0' 50' 100' 150' 3a BLoO sex(rvP) •nee 201211615PPOt tlwg NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Dt� 03/28/13 shore 10 op 23 WnMgad SnNoR Inc PI'ep i ared Savona Lennar Corporation T689 Anspram Orn� 4MG wrpwAim wd MY I��dil,14ad i'P�+AI. � � Or. ��. Eeen PrevN,MN SI.Ye Iwrut�mAr 1b Inn d tY ar.al Ym.m c5n>n�rte...Pn rn,canmm,e Preliminary Site Plan - PHONE 95Y9e T•Se60 „w own Home Area TouP1Rt wee-sm-stw Fyn M.Bhlhm R pgd ar 1M Wfd. 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 �, p� 06/14/13 Tt�po 41257 Elmo, nn Plymouth.Minnnesote,55446 lake Elmo, Miesota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging 1 811 or ca11811.com / r I Common Ground Alliance _.---__------------------------__----------- GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: r x* ^� a>, "a"�•—'0N .��,.,r ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/GUTTER A w x» a ALL STIORM CATCH�ASINS T e s -+0 a 6 _ --- Ra, GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. SILT FENCE INCLUDE INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) --�� o __ \_ -- r�- - 1oz 'ol 'r ' - • REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT — —————— - / s,— „�„�• j r 3 ) HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT. r 7 L J 1040--- 0 Bn x iR Rn o' o • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING 1 W 107✓ U71UTIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE OWNERS AND FIELD-VERIFY 1 � r . 2 1 ro--^�' PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE _ I, �•� I -� +� a/ lol ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN. -------1 i------�--- ---1 r -; — P6p--� r-_+ --` - - t o _ ��1' I /J\ t t` �1 I l o -I o+ . - }- • ALL RCP FOR STORM SEWER SHALL BE CLASS III UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED / '� 1 v • ALL CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET, RC�1 et $ /� ' �> `i 8 r� i _ I- 1 -�r+o eln�6 I RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLANS REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. n\ ..x 1. B a• ' ° B, MR I a,mis u� a� 1 a T a^ a I Rn Rn x/t en• ua �LOf� 0 • ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES- , y��rs---=�.s4'��'�•es- ` , t ° " \\\ a± y �- - �I Na 1 n loos • POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES LEE J ( EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 1 _ ab'?- _r—�•' r -r -g- ~ w o • ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN-PLACE & ��0•a i I 'o°ss�O ..�. I ae 0e0 ms 1 I j06 °/ ` �'�f 1\ � � /' ' Q '_b� �3 0 - r PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL ® I I • L JS . rJrxi° l�atlh l 1'"_X R I 1�•.• `c VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED. EXISTING SILT FENCE 1 _ 1 — �,y 1 - i roe w0® i + I L--r - ° R R aa1 Eon ` ON SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED w•rr + ,. aaa mae ' ros ' x \ I /, ` / ��^ d` J�10 J L_'1ong 4 INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE ' 4 If AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS WITH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL. E a� ON 4 '- ---- _t 1\yam ewB \p6O i o ' 1 TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES. HAYBALES. ETC., REOUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE t,a. _ �.-- 7�_-_•' ___ �' ✓ \ \ / \` 1 /! ` ° f os INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. I I I °"° 110'>• f �` \ \ � x d - 4 „ r � � �, • ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END I I -,ea, e / \ \ r i "�// a,,, / ,•r - r a / ' r / I r� OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED '�$$.� loco yuuu2—.ffy�f,� j Jib• ! /o,�s / t '�''« Y v 1 a c /1 I+ r 1 �° I_ "g « :.., ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS- {� R1aew'4 I� R�i PW� ]0�I E� 3 •�• ±��\ / \ ° !� '1 /^ w� /0 a�+ / \ r--- — • � a so, •m1e , ea i / , 9 1« �' r�-- r-��rr"'I �.ti� t'w o+ �\o \ r � � ���� \ /. 'o yb r t, � � t• 1� 1 ' \ L • il` I ow3°,I anra ,m,�al am,s•z t • to5� �� r� 1r t �\ "`'F' _ \ . -b 1 I M 3 I �1 i B \ ,,,e ' / Q8� / ' / �i / � b a 1 \f"� b_ f•+y 8S i e g g i r t g � =z; \ t � DENOTES SOIL BORING O(MOTF - - i oz6 g 5 g DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE ------ ss - - `_t ; � � �_ I � $o � � •� �- � 1 ; •� moo\ robi. - "a s_ y/ \ - - DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS r\ �I Ca J gr gp r n $ ry a . _^r f ° r980�► DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER -------------- 1 It ap �. �'� o - I ' xt a \ t\ ^\\ I / r s- r t .� FB►—♦♦ DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE q a DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE \ t o J(�Jlti T J ° \\ � ] , 1• / [ o^r / /� /WYYY� REMOVAL LIMITS 856 3 DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION POND i tt POND 1 H \ I•'_/ \� • v�. m® \\ S t. ,, 1 - OND J \ w dl'e / MAINTENANCE ss�w DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION t NWL=926.0 c t o ! a�$ ,/ / cPei MAIN CE /' `��o / +O°'�' I 'a• �) � ACCESS DENOTES BIO-ROLL EROSION CHECKS ACCESSI tt HWL=929.0 T\• n \ ^w� Y c °jr-•J - I M1 J J / /'O/ ral ��t; DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW It �'\\. o .;y \•, „ �,rre �^ y ! � / �. ��\ / / NWL=999.0 Eor ELEVATION I 1 t s'- �\' � r •� a `/ �� % for °3 HWL=1001.B tt INFILTRATION BASIN 1s \\ \ ��•° �`'��� f ro a \ // // * / INFILTRATION BASIN 3 OUTLET EL=925.0 `a �' ' °3ae r/ -� r- By / �tal / to\ �p 1m l OUTLET EL=998.0 t HWL-929.0 '� \ \ Q,y\ / 10i'•o l '<'0"0 81 HWL=1001.6 \$ t \ /"4�°r+� t pl � Qo or BOTTOM=997-0 BOTTOM=924.0 r01 POND NWL=915.5 �� o J�F/ e \ter•` +� OPE TABILIZATION 3 MAINTENANCE HWL=919 5 �` .� \ �j �.4 _ EROSION CONTROL E ACCESS `:ate J ��. .B ro2�� - tol / •s BLANKET(TYP.) INFILTRATI N BASIN 2, •� .+�� OUTLET EL=915.0 r \ ' ALL STORM CATCH BASINS TO HWLgq919.5 _ 'tt t BOTTOMr=914.0 ~�_- - _1I 41 ' h INCLUDE INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) t OUMOT M 29 ttl t 11 1 fi02 102 1 t , 3:1 SLOPE -SILT FENCE (TYP.) STABILIZATION '1 ' tt t; EROSION CONTROL t 100' 200' 300' tt 1 It I BLANKET(TYP-) t. II i NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161GDP01 D,r 03/28/13 sheet 11 OF 23 W )699 Ma0rm IXlvw ffiwi BBP�vWm oN d1r,I u.del,:bnr,rAOFEgP`1AI. > wed CLI f Savona ding remnaryra r EWn Pra,lla.MN 6filae aa�1JM Owe a(bt 5•eu N Y•aaren �/,)/,l RemNte Lennar Corporation Drainage & Erosion m/1w/,3 xWw B°Cdr Cemm.,ls mskad R2g PHONE B62-Bar-fi150 iAl( B6TB3>-66Y2 Dream I[w c0 , ,ae 0-files Ryan hL Wuhw 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Control Plan y ww•a r yks b—IF.— one 06/14/13 tie xa 41257 s.med o,e..re:In/aa� Plymouth, Mir=esota, 55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota 1 . 11 WMAWWA ;�, PO D MAINTENANCE �rd Ol ME MEMO �av-1 U' � (��/9" �"• �, if �' ' � � �--� ���`��'►' �t! K 1 •• � .�'"�i� .�. - 7�� � ✓ '� .yam •.� \� IRMA �,•� •• � � � Ills F'�� %r,� �i �s••�� ' :•. . . ..� . IMI Immilli. �i,�: u Ilii �. _ �u�I�z - unC7 .. � � � �� ■15 -A Is J _ �j r li��€� �jlail�! �■Hii�? iit�ayil� 'ii�Gl',� ln��� rll®�Iln ����.II iiff��.M _ .. Savona •�/ a - � it n �r'J � i �u�.;>,u� F ii ry n� ii. �i '��w�l ��_� � ' ,.:. r tJ� .. 1 Elmo, o 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc ' Call 45 Hours before digging: 1 , ) 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance 8" DIP PLUG GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: ACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION • THE CONTRACTOR ,o, b, ,•, ,,, ,,,�,,, „„ ,o,-� ,.�---•a •a "°' '"' "°' ,of"' AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. ra '0' • UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST. TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL ---------`- --------- ---------- --------- --------- ------------------- ------ CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE "STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER 28' H 11 MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER B-B E=1037. INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE 1 t =1025.4 "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION"MINN. DEFT. OF TRANS., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 AUGUST 31,2005 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE 1 2 ROW REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY '----- .___. r • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NECESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE f j---_---- t OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS. 1 �MH 1 I 13 • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOC. k ELEV- PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION. IRE=1048.2 2 3 YD. (TYP. H 1E=1037.2 Q R =1065.5 MH 5 6 8 9 10 =1053.5 • THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED WITH A MIN OF 7.5 FT. OF COVER THE "• 1 RE=1 64.5 MH MH cai 7 6 5 4 3 2 CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS-BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK N IE=i 33.6 RE=106 6 RE=1 4.0 1I I 4 1O . = 8 LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. IE=103 2 IE=105 • ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED - B" DIP LUG y��r 0 CP 9 1Z & . ' �49 B',DIP wM 7 v. B 5 • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT"GOPHER STATE ONE CALL' FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR TO UTILITY INSTALLATION. 7 /• ROP M f2 J 2 3 4 $ 6 6 RROP E=105 .3 I 6 H m 12 14 OUTL T G RE=1039.4 <v I o 3' 1 -- -- - ------R -1061.E -- -- - - -- =�.T---- -- 1 8" G.V, m Zip RE=102 .0� RE=102 MH - s IE=1023.0 a: tE=10T7. IE RE=1057. IE 1034.3 f 4'0� 15 13 I (T�' IE=1035. � � 14 E RCP STM I ROP H d S ++`+' RE=10 1.7 1 r 1 AIH Z MH DROP E-1039.7 1 MH MH J \} E=10035.47 RE=104 .9 �� `vim e 1 =1 N 7 RE-1039.9 I =1 IE=1030. `� `0 RE 1047. IE=1022.4 IE=1008.4 IE 1031.E MH 15 5 1 i 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 2 16 RE=to 1 M 14 MH H 2 14 L d MH IE=1032. ' RE=10 3.2 =1 5 I R 10" IE=10 22 H1 IE=1006.6 EXISTING 8" DIP PLUG S 3 IE--10 .0 • 17 I 10 18 RE=1015. 6 Sanitary Sewer a- (TYP.) r ► r IE=10 -I- 2 m1 3Hyd Water w\Volve -I 1 e- t` H ,• H 4U' I ` 8 MH r Z 4 13 7 Storm Sewer -a�- =1047.6 5 E=105 8"PVC SAN tt R +V J On a 3 4 5 I =1030.2 =1031. . MH 12 E=999.3 Tn PROPOSED 6 2 1 RE= -L pti tia0 1 021.2 H 1 3 r^ 5 8 I Sanitary Sewer -�- ,+1 • 0'6p I RE-1047 1 2 •4 + \ Water -I- 6 S 3 2 Hyd w\Valve -I--"+ 1 + 7 H RE=10 8.2 6 9 Storm Sewer - + ( POND 1 a . I 4 IE=10043.5 IE-1017.2 MH5 -+ Sanitary Force Main-FM- + 1 NWL=926.0 .� N• Jl v t + HWL=929.0 8 4 RE=1-7 1 7 / '�� H 8 9 9 IE=997 8 G FUTURE +1 ++ \ OUTLOTD / \ 3 MH - 6 ( ) Sanitary Sewer �tE=1038.9 5 t RE=1023.3 -• 1027.9 H4 01I7ZOTF I -------- water ( r RE=1037 9 - + � 9 to IE=10 ' = O P0�0 3 \ Hyd. w\Valve \\ �` Storm Sewer -ate =999.0 ------- \ I 4 5 RE 1 s� - 016 RE- 1 ------ + _ \ + �. l O =1024.1 �Qt C7 7 ,r ----- --- --_-. , � � R -1y 033.3 _- • 6 MH 6 'S)iC/OUTLOTF RE= . + + RE 1033. IE=101 102.4 t + 8 7 IE 1009.4 H r MH 6 1 H t + E=102 6 7 RE=1022 0 i RE=1006.2 POND 2 RE=1034. 8 1011.0 • IE=995 2 +, It1FlLTRATION BASIN r � NWL=915.5 IE=1023. 11=1�9. 1 + O+UTLET EL=925.0 1 l HWL=929.0 1 =91 9 1 5 es Otis OUTLOT M +1 BOTTOM=924.0 Q. ' 07 Lam^ I 1 r MN • 4cP MH / \ MH 1� 4 RE=1014.4 ` +` r• IE=993.9 RE-1028.8 R 1035.5 1023.0 • S� Aq , 1! y m RE=1018.5 `l INFILTRATION BASIN 3 + + FCC , 2 '( OUTLET EL-998.0 + 19 S\\ 12N m o 0 8 IE=993.0 'aA X 1+ < DROP M �7 BOTTOM-997.0 g � R RE=1 .4 DRO MH I RE=103 5 =1023.0 s I CaS ' =1008. RE=024.8 DROP IE 1022, IE=992.2 ?. INFILTRATION 915.ASIry 2 IE=1O069 IE=1009. g OUTLET 919,5 .b IE= HYO. (TYP. HWL=919.5 I " 4 BOTTOM=914.0 d I r�r OUTLOTMH M v + + I RE=1019,9 1++ + ++1 I IE=1008. t MH + ++ RE-1025.3 CONNECT TO EXISTING L__ IE=991.5 +� 1, WATER MAIN (BY OTHERS 100' 200' 300' + , + CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (BY OTHERS) NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION STUB IE=990.4 20121181UTP01 dwg D.K 03/28/13 shrc 13 Or 23 Vru wood 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 iol.urBnNSRnkV �� i699 Rnepr"m D.Ive m.Rn Rq...w=."n ror r.m.o-.,q u®.a e¢oe®on•c p"W0" Oedg� C.1 Prepared for. Savona EQYn Pr rl,MH SSW {�=bt dr Vn d rM Sus d Ymmd� y/1)/IS RMe"ra ary CanmalP 06/1./13 RMf"Pb GfY CeinneiM Lennar Corporation Preliminary Utility Plan PHONE Bs)•-1. I" 86]AJT3B)? � !1{Y raum>£ 1-096-B3TS1fi0 Ryan M Bluhm Westwood -gym„r wk 06/14/13 +�=N. 41257 s.ma o=`r'R b'r�r` Plymouth. Minnnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota c 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging7: 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 1 1 INFILTRATION BASIN 4 OUTLET EL=952.0 I HWL=956-0 1 B" DIP PLUG BOTTOM-951.0 ------------ -- ----------------- --- -- ------------ -----------------------••------------------- -------- ---------------------- ---__-_---------- ------------ --------------- -------------------------- ---- n H 37.1 CONNECT TO R 1 RE 7ltf •? 5 r \ EXISTING SANITARY 1 IE=10 5.1 - H M 7 8 I SEWER(BY OTHERS) 1 2 a 4 5 6 7 8 9 V 977.2 6 E 523.4 OUTLOT C I STUB IE-940.2 H'_ IE=96 2 I -1 Ol 0 IEE 9876g n 2 y RE 979.5 j 18 MH 9 \ POND 6 DIR E=964.4 i7 5 RE= 4.4 NWL=948 0 ► ► 1 =9 ..2 17e l H-965.7=95 RE= 2.1 \ HWL=952.0 3 3 IE- 7 1 951 1 J0 H / 1 POND 4 / 4 H \ RE=953.8 rMH CID0o I o u NW1=953.0 R 61.0 IE-942.8 RE=955.9 4 10 8 7 awl 5 4 3 2 1 '\ m� 2 =956. =sso.o M� I IE=941.7 f \: D �83 9 r MH_69.5 8 RH RE=955.0 112 IE=943 9 MH OP IE=971 l 958. ys° RE=986.1 1 1 = 3.5 M 2 ► ► 1 I 5 9 �& 2 E=975.1 H 1 RE 72.3 B2B 7 . " ►spN >Y 1 10 E=9772� IE= 1.3 A6 8 G.V. ECT TO 6 12 14 T G 6p�B \. I =96 E=974.7 Rp�' ) 1� $TH STREET NORTH EXISflNG WATER MAIN RE 9392.2 3 E=962 2 5 RCP STW (BY OTHERS) IE=981.2 . H 4 is 2 • a p 5 4 95 .9 1/9 9679 Lid �� H 96Z3 7 1 4 IE=988� 1 H 1 2 3 MH 9 0 ,E=956.3 = ! s .q -959. 14 � 2 14 5 O � f �'{ 1 MH 6 5 (X/7L01 L W e M ="r'• 7;,5 �, P j �` V 3 RE=997.5 OUTLOT H 969.5 ,2 IE=986 6 h .� -958. 51 r RE-960.0 i 4 i3 7 �� r :< • 4: j IE=949.0 I LECMW 12 3 m 8 7 ��4 5� HY y 3, FI 6 ' a f f I I EXISTING 2 5 MH ~ P '�, - '2 k =961.8 >! Sanitary Sewer -d RE-10 E=948.2 I I Water - - I 3 11 9. MH / �,q; 6 '"`�' d' H RE=964.0 I Hyd. w\Valve 6 - 85.2 :4, J E=96 1, IE=947.8 I -ao- HYD. TYP. / '6% Storm Sewer 5 ( IE=974.2 OUTLOTI \ . IE=94 4 r 9 9 7 asp NFILTRATION BASIN 5- /�' i .9, _ E_g t3 \ I OUTLET EL=942to 16 EX POND PROPOSED OUTLET EL=964.0 \ \ .3 . -7'. .6, EX HWL=946.9I Sanitary Sewer -q- ____ PROP. HWL=9 3.4 HWL=968.2 POND 5�r /\ ' 7 (g 3� � I ) Water -I 6 - BOTTOM=963.0 T 5 _ 8 MH HWL=966.2 �H i.0 RE=969.5 ? P 3; Hyd. w\Valve -I---«} O--�--- \ ' RE-989.8 RE=974.7 _ IE=947, a• 48"FES OCP fE=978. STREET 1 � I -956' -• r Storm Sewer �. OT K s E-942.0q Sanitary Force Main-FM- •• \\ a� ► ► Qvc RE=971.2 R -969.3 h 800 7 i f'-- ♦MH H - _ _ 956.8 j RE=9 .61 6 �( i -Or,� pr RE=98411 RE-981-1 R =97 ___ ,__ _ �OTL IE 1 FUTURE Y =9 .6 y '9 Sanitary Sewer a- ►� z� 1-I 13 _4; '_e_ ?I '6 -� ,a- I I I Water -I- 2 sl / H I I Hyd. \ -I- ¢ 4. l r2 --j - g1 ;7 3; RE=968.9 54" S RCP w Valve IE=957.9 e> ff[�EE Storm Sewer -� :8 q :d yqt ,a r 1E=935.00 Awr 5 i OUTLOT M :e 41 ;q _4) 4 41 is 4 1 - 0 HYD. IE 9 B48 EE 964.9 EE 63 5 E-962.278" EE 948a3 la I PVC PLUG IE=94B.6 �f I � I I 1 0' 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161UTP02 4-9 D b`- 03/28/13 Sheet 14 or 23 Vh*. ed"9� StaNau.hK. ��u�h n= q� p..,� a, Prepared for. Lennar Corporation Savona preliminary Utility Plan aNGII,'BII mee ft k-a ta.s9r a am.w. as/t7/t3 RrA..Pw GtY oo--a a9/t•/13 R>.4.D•Gt>Canm.ni. @e}e� alm PHONE 854.9ST-w i41t 81,24S16eTP. 0 w HW TOLL" --in. Ryan M.Bhthm Maaad��brdEt 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 VVesty ood wwnweaweoapuam I- 06/14/13 t,, 41M Plymouth,Minnnesota,55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota e 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc ➢n•z 2 ALL YATt N AND.0MIUB"S MUST BE CONSTRUCMD W ALCOAn1NCt 1/1N 4 Rrt 11_�II TJL'CJTY or LAM FLYO S}ANDUN$iW111GTlONS AXD DLTAIls _ EE�,_wI YANIPULITSON Ol tl/STMC YKYLS SXAIl%PLNORYLD ONLY HY GfY PLRJONNLL MYPAGIL➢bCMf WLL ODi!' ., 1AT[PJWN SHALL Bf 4- 'IT IRON PIPor"I.CLASS-bY III, .JIITA OD I .ALL FLTTLNCJ SHAlI zrx Fd rN urNr SPFC 2S1/YJ.1 KL NrmoCS SNAIL 8£ �- DULTJLE IRON PJPE rod POLYETH A,FNGS[YdNT ALL CONNCCnONS SHALL Be [,L i ONBiSNRBED ASri Dt]tl LAANVGR - ^ - IN51ALIdD OTILZINC COA BWL NUTS f BOLTS Sn STANDARn PA"No COnR,/Y NOTi s 1 BELOI/FARO SU%ACLS rt.S IN [OYIfl IITTMLS IITtl PGSn !Y%DYN/T YATIRGL p D COMPACTED ) S USI G}t YALVd3/pR ALL APPWAT/OHS OP TNROVOx 1t 1NCXLS TV"ARdAJ �RN41 fp PoVRINC a (YRDDT SPEC A. ✓ _ T /P b Y'3'- 'L+• turt4 Atl 1+ a GTl YKVLS SXAU%%S1LtNT BIT"AYLNCW r CONTROL SLRid3%00 M i < / APPAOVdD LOOK GTL'AW YUsT COMPLY EITN CLAY SPFC tuf 4,Ct CD11D ELEVATION `, •," _; O.D�(A"Y1R) �^ LLLBB&ll-f T USE BOTT[NLY VKYdS FOR ALL APPLGTIONS FWT[R THAN 12 INCHES !•/1 6• U AHED •ASfY At]EI Dot Y.1 B.HOfTWLY YKYIS SNAIL 8f YU[LLLA Z#LSLK 1N OR APPROVED IDUK BO`T7r`1 "4rc IWI' *•'' 1:1LYa5 9XAIL COMPLY AfX CdAY SPdC 46r1 Y.C9 TilAc! uTlcuuv COVdR G!l ULVt 80# GRANULAR MATE BEDDING aYBtDYrNr arLAue- i:��.0 T-T'.� w Y9n sPiar (ro Bt Vat➢INd%.M rar OPINION or THE LNIJ=X U%TABLE (YMOf BPlC],AB Er)��= � 9 80W3 WD NUJ4 ON A/L Y.ELVLS ANO MDIIINTS SHALL Hd 3TilN1dSS STLLL IITN HOL INSTALL VKYL HOR AMPTLA(slt DtTAJt EPI) 2 YITdAYI PREVENTS US[Or IHE"LATH rOUNbnOX"DL}AILI .•� r• .•.���'� O%1/t.MINI ^'v(rm AlTaRa�/ GTL YKYl ••,, i J r0 ALL HSBRANTS SHALL BE.STALLED 5 a 1[a!BACd OF CUAB rtmwn CO�PrLTID 11 to1rA mw �ID rATd s 3 /4 oow ROCd All +•-A.... 1l 0.D. iE' A/PY tNStALLATION IN !/T1 S/NLBBE Sd1"OV 1dd STAM AND PAIx %D.APPAOYdD d91fAL • Yi1NlS IVIN I XM /S CY RroRfYNCd nl AJTY D A3tl,TAHLF S (Y!N CY W IYPLAV)OUS 3025) 1 Y1 NYD.4NTS SYAIt aVl TIO ODTLLT N011£IS MA t-,/Y(!D)1.3E CONNLC!/OXs USd"XdG LUO'RRV1D YlCNANIGL n •EY 1xWEN!WTLAI SNLL CONFORM TO ASTY DZ.1.TABLE I AND ONL A'3M%NOFLLF • m,��n R JNNr TNRUST A.TNNIR LJ.IXAT AT IJ IIII[VRH$TIP E.A.t A$%Y BHAIL FAYt A YMJYUL,-PT ADNSTYWT a AU JO1NT4 SUPPLSYtNT"Q WDS PIER T BANLa AND SHAG ETTWD J INCHES.0.FfNSMdD LAADa RULLY[SnNDlO iu r AFn uJa. •r //� rITX 2J/1•STAMLFS3 S}IdL UO PS/COA'C%JL mr� p�W Tld AODS A3 DfR[Cl[D BY LNGNtIA zB DAY srF£NCTH TA TXL CdvMA[YMR SHLLi.BL%SPONSfBLl JOR MOYIDML GTIR ro NOY[S AND trr • .r ey LONG%Ja aNNOL! YXOP}3l31 TYPE J - nLSINlS3I3 IHOSa LTdR SUPPLY 15 n/SAU➢f1RINC TIf[COURSt or>M OffO•NOTES . Ovornv Atsmc 1rwND rrtuAT arm m Aoi`I AIC •!r �/ PAOJaCT aft RAa tuv y nACN.1OP Or BOXxtr _ t LLu ml!uB i AeVa ar�w:�rrr nT]E iYlrta sYv•u a ns vut a lti•�1�. NOTES I It3RI i iU u S N/fYI A Yi emu•'" UPPLY Mrs BE 11'GTE IoU.AW➢n PAW=AS DIXICT[D BY THE LNOfMeH TErm sN....BE D"=MEB TD rxa Lin_Cf EARTH FOUNDATION SECTION dXC PT SA ..,. . . (FOA PVC SANITARY SPIFR PIPE) "' )IATERMAIN PLANS (VALVE IN BOULEVARD) _ (POR BENDS) NEINAN G fNC R-1l BW Rx (!YIN s -sHAPpD YLTK TYPE'B'SOLD LVVYR 11A.Y W j f£NCf PoST uTH CONCRLAD P/CW PAfNTLO H ,ALL SANITARY SEIEA AND A0 SSON[S MUST Ba COXSTAAND D 1N ACCORGNCF y Lsr RE DETCAM LENGTH TO I/TX TYS GTY or IAKL LLYD STANDARD SPICIF/GTIONS AND DFTA115 -lM1-oxIF DTIurY useyrxr LWr BE DIVANCENLD U.' •..r oR[QIIK ACCORPANCL SOC D 1 P i NL SAXfTAFY s11£R PNC OM SeWi BE rNS11I3E0 ACKNONO TD O1V STANDARD RESEARCH ASSOC STANAAADS DRASANG,03"CPY,uWt YNIOOAL BEDDNO YEMDO O'd1 PVC SNATNiT 4MEA g/2'YOAJ (A$ H➢LC lIdD) PROPEAn LNl Ie'.BRI•AICfD ppL) If1dW AMCS ST' LSdY POLYSTYRENE Gs1LVo Y AND pD f M CU%BOY JUtLY.dlLATlO INSULATION J UNL NOTED ox.-Inz ALL SMOOTH tar•+O SAN1'AAY SLRR PYC PJPd AND IlANNOLI/W/W 9 YJNP.CLJO PIPE AND F/nMLS ABOVE IM/dtlLD ORAOL Ib'Y J BEND f11T/N0.4<v i BL SDR SS I/TH LG.mml G `Eo JOINTS SYoorx Ox THE � Tom U3LD/OA DROP zd ox /)NSxlD CARD! (TYPICAL) -,or AND Wf3! rIa DROP o'smoN P/Dl silt TO BE rt^r ♦ALL s.11Mv gKR STANCES SMALL sC 4-JNM PVC.SCN 40 OR SN 18 i`iK W MORTAR ON EEO dou Umr ro MLK PIP.Nu MSIDa f]rivux BYurn TfL� S£IPR S SYDOIN IALLdD PRC PIPd AND NTTINCS Sao IbNIORY IITH fB[%OV!%YEN}S W IX�yu Vnt uuu>-T U.fl V[--t--/J]/ OF I-D-..FOR TILE B.Z.STANDARD DIYWSION BAT10(-A).AND STRWGtN Pam, �Al.;7 AEWJREYFNTS INDI4TdD➢x TXE PLANS.9PlCllfUTRUA.AND S,o PAOYLS)ONs - 77._."B_,7 D/P PfPI ro BGA r1TN0UT RISER AAXFOACd➢COMC%T[P/Pd AMD lITTMOS SXIl1[ONIOAY YJIN TflL Af0U1AfYP'NTSOf YMOr SP1C J4Je(RL1xFOADdD CONC%Tt PIPd)N#JNL TY1E.Sltd.JND �RS �. WrlL6 SLd OdfMl - i a �i� 1.11.Or MANNOLE.SEA SECTIONS SHILL Ba nwo-t AAT LA00r[EJM ; UY YCDOb1D 9A901B RUBBER"O"NNO.1XT3 PROYDx9 ON ALL SAXT Al sdlNl YWHOLIS. 2 PlP r R APAOYED IOVK i` aR�' 1 O.D PLU a SAX/TARY SE1IR WELT AND OUTfAS"PIS W2 111W M J01ATD 1 EK suAoft RN 3rAMLt GSMTSD.IL D BAN.IA To TAT CONXICTION ro IftOs DifJ[%NJGL SFITLEYLNT 8"SSU CH PlA LOO E.p' Or 11/d PI➢d AND YINNOI.F ro!AM PGLS A'•'ti1� ` S�ll / ff8 AwRortn CNYPlD SXUT PLLYfB1[ LLWISfRUCT/OM JOf ii rN mrR 9 A '-0'ro 1'-4"YAxXOu BILLION rm r%1METALI.O UNDIF THL['ONd I A# •" SEEM !/N[CLSSARY SJ ION ro ILD1/OIL N.fCXf ADJUSTY[Nf rNWtVW POSSNrr• SECTION A-A FLEXIBLE WATERTICXT MNC%R YN ewGX N01£- fITTTXCS SHALL BE RCSTRAINED ,O AL"Awes LNl STom N-1 NAa A d'xf'HA _D Y4e1QR uTN CONNECTION [VMC#ET HOPSE3N0[S r1 N%s 1ATLRYAIx ITITN THE USE OF APPROVED YECXANfCAL oRTK Dora r•R Aarprmc am t wsv Lams evu I w/TlRT.N} uNrl Y YCDONAID ldR yyEEAN SP111 AUNNWG lAOY TN[IND OF Pl➢d TO/fNI3H.D_E LL. TioX S _ d1b Nfil YINNf1/tlL5 $IEEE BE ONE CONrIA'UOUS P/FC£OF JOINT RES77AfN1NO GLANDS T I UPoN YAANO A CONNECT..To Ax Lt-Ac LNITARY sJ1YR STUB OR MANHOLE vA+voY Iuu•tert.u X]]141m.'+Tp+4 CONGt - lYrtuu(mlTicrtal IUP M APPAOYlO nP!'Y COPPdR III.NO UNNWY NAT WD OdBN3 3xAll BL P%ioer IRO.I""zo THL Ld/'IA'0 SCILA HY u arv+ Ta�ru IS.4rtc to ' dAUK BtnILN roP S10P WD CV%STOP _ IYYl➢LTdLY lXSTALUNO ITWNOHT➢WG4IS NilDLD IN TNY FYfSXNE YINXOIA w i TYPIGL.AlaA SLAms 1'TD 2 I/4'COPPdA _ IpryrtA�' n y u - it •..•.,rxTpv w..,u Drtry,...uxau 78 tart mrnDr S10P1 VA '•'MiffA�^I"•%� ' _ _ YIL mm:umt . RMc uxr sD 1NAr rnPu LOOP sou.Nor AorrAR amr Ara meAr Aw.ru nraue 4I mar wn.cr Al sxalx °'2 i>;'1`::.:+•': MITX Rl5£R n .1,.:a.,,,',`�t4 rtw]Y4°nR.IN +y�'..:�t..f:, LYTWD AB..ltlM YUMLN>3'Y)NIYVY COYLR TOR AL S.AVJCL LNL3 - SANITARY SEVER PUNS (PIPES EV" OR LESS) - - NLWAN ai=me A-sw-Y AW o!Z YM I" B.LYsa G1CN a- /P'MORTAR HLT1t YAX F NNCS BtLOY OVnLA 'IxAl1-sNE10'SLL NdENAH.-No A-1.19 IN IN //1 Y1X.1 O RINDS USTfNC. ANO YORTARI /�P YMTM BdTl1! MAIL LMt Rp TYPE a 30fJD COYdR 1 ALL SroRY SdKR AND ACCI3SONlS YU3}a COX3TRULTdO iN ACCORDANCd Nf£NAN GSIINO R-AJ YAT O/AIM- AND TOP SLAB 1f1NFS.GSlfNO Y GTL IlIT/CONC•.r«n PKWaA3 •IXIf-SHIELD'3LAL bNN rM/SN SYO°M RWG4(P YfM.10' /4'YOR1M BETIELN ND YOATAAJ. IWISN SMOOTH ON Ofl NUK. OM lMIN AND OUls1DL HAd O/AWOS• RUACS.CASfJ1/C! IITH JN.CJTY Or GAT dW0 STANDARD SPLGINAT10N3 AND Mlanc THL fNS)DI yp9fM1 YANXOL[./INS. P_N N_L at zr.P/Pl AND 1-m.SL/L NXrMY IITA THa FPVUfR.YtNTs �� A ilA PALL S!TY➢L 11 LtlVIR SL1B INfl-SH/dLp"SEAL SMOOTH ow MS1Dt or YMOT 3PdC 3SS!(RLW/OR[dD aw"T!PIPIT/OR TM TYPE S/2E.AND �O I/E'YOAfM BdTRLN CU .L_ OR LOVK SlRfNClA WSS SPEC/ILLD H£BL/N RINGS.G3'TIXO• RB/NILt IRINC M'D •••f-,tY "IN/I-SHIELD"D'IIDL _ P%GSr COITR 1i V .00 YfX. /NJl-SHIELD'SPA aNHO/A nNISX N RH BOY NIINx ¢� Lr LY}�RNIL-I1G➢, ]P%CAS}L'ONC%TE LLNHOfL AND CATCN b 1N BECKONS SN•rr COX."ro TM o OR£DDA \ SYOp]x ON 1NNDd OR dOG1. tI• (TYPE R/ %OL/fAFYLNTS Or ASTY C-IM 2t' WD OVfSMER_➢! L ���'•y MORTAR A 1'-0'ro I'-1•YANxOIl sfCnON SKUL BE INSlILL[D UNDFA 1NE COME y, C/•'•,.e loW S1IC••.. Be"GAL SrA. a i 3dCflON ro ALLO//OA Ya/CHr ALWSTYENT 1NENLV[A PoSNBLE II = + W 1 9INPS 9RL u no , Z Y L sdu.oN STAB Jaxrs 3 Jaxrs N YANNOu RfSaA SdCl70NS SHul M TONGUE WD EROOVS 11TN a ' Y13i "1 A I I NNo J _PR➢_ON ALL 31'OHY 3t►aR YANNOLdS n PLAN s NP-AAP sfi=as END-➢GCED OuR GOTL1Tl/l fABNC AND CONTORY To Lu/LM /�CIYEN}YU#TAR r ly YRDOI SPEC]tOf.CIA.N,OR As sPtCVII.HEREIN YORTAA %GIBS GTCN atf _r Of0 HATAII LUTRR T I=DLDTLI'PILf IABNC-UNDER RIP-RAP Sa anWD]n UNDER 1HL' L OAAOF LN[ •-»• (,•_ - J`• !,Y YM)i LLYWt MORTAR q55 SECTION /7 /Y'YOALIIP N}rdaN q I APAOX ---- _ / ADN4TYtN)NN RMOS G3SIxC a �uL P%G3l bSd - B fU%ISM a A'STItt TIPA]H a/AAD.4 ON.Vl/G%D IND SLCT10N5 _ r L lYW OI P ON OM (�£UNJ YX •�-c A-A YAX Ol RINGS D Alt SILT SRAM BI CWx.D OUT lROM Ml RIP-FAP AT TXL IXD Or rM PRaI[LT 'WD YOR}ARJ' - I DL. fHICRNIs - Y� 1 P%GST aS[ - i AND OUTBID[ I - Yx SGB _ C.YLNI' Gil uu III+++ �1+T!- II+ DY1G TNC.MIs L XOATAA s"P%$SST I A �/Nrl-SNIaIL'S fOxC E dI. b C 1 I'r 1 PRFGST A,-0, DRLN Tffd LtlNN[RI fL _J asl SLAB frpMp'dRyT LOGTdD ABOYa dATdND pO/,U(L/T pIPL. Aar av+i taut u vVA7l r aw ia fN rJ INCR.s IN1U J•a rtv YVuJlrte euAwo.eoLrn °AfTaC;OIvuTYUTN GVY rH ptl4 G/CM a3/N 1nmf.'N9 vpY.+Rut u O.ua Y NATMrO ar!uOA vraeu r9IYl A w�RA Snrinairprrr AR OKT P%GST lip ` u K*Y Pam.' bt O 4uTrn'Pu JN•u u • 1r» °FUTM IfR • u asf my cur war ufv s. TAMr•hm hnn.LT rnvTRAmna. Opm.. SECTION A-A wArmrAyre•9ers r0aumuusr..'••rory r,u Pawasat An ;R�___ _.ra mx ^�•"rR.0 rr u�nTtn b rxitiT4wi iwRs�' mA.•n*ArwlarrtA DYNAr1r RANvouu� m x TUAra�ir duNwr.m,.�.'r mR o-Rwo rrun.urrsiu..vr aarr rrw oL.wm Lm .PAma•'•r mA a,a r m.arnd r..AaAArpm s1m w• rtrwr amra..,,.9e>oosTn]NPo11. .�`8i1wY•`Aiu rxrGsr RNxroRcrD LDXLurd G1nf asM A bsr sun nRi,�Y^a+"'+'rt"141ra•' •�••� mR o uc r++om. �: L e+Ar.•+TR.0 u wsaurn D.�4�4 wa PLA ASTY£ATe uu,nit slrrr vwrAA Tm CrursT vaRr a1.mi yr .m�'R`•aAAa-A. rRmf1. STORM SERER PLANS . I (PIPES 27"Toil LESS) Call 48 Hours before digging: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or col1811.com 20121161DTPO1 Gwg Common Ground Alliance DDTe 03/28/13 SheAt 15 OF 23 ��. x/.LwRRdholrolDmffwlAlafnc 1e..eTAaWTW.tWaP1a9..A4'bbT..=r..} Re1Wws prepared for. Savona IW9 ABRBr•w oM.. .. .�p.abem.•e IeY 1...a.y Bmad rRoemsEOLut �tSL L«°PrPr1..YN 1H>.A Lennar Corporation Details PHONE m/ra__ ]R.w•0a Cnr CarnmA.,ta 964�93T•6150 TAA 96293TbB22 D.-aU., do.31-616D Ra I'L BYRlvhm 9mA4-�� 16305 Avenue North Suite 600 VIICStwOOd YANYcvw9LYaoepce9Rl O� 06/14/13 L Na- 41257 Plymouth,Minnnesota,SSW Lake Elmo, Minnesota o2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc ss €€ •�•f YrY aJK fµ afa r%•nf our �C�oY x:lll�GsnNc R-eI>pTrPf R s uD Mrxul cAsnNo R-1Nt rOPd Y aew a t3!g 777575557 E tr, � 7:':r, 1 /In+ .1-� CORK IN NNC� cAHDLIS D NNC9(2 YIN. o'YtX CORF IITR NNCRLIBD Ntn/ / I, N RMLS YOA IA). •f#I-SXA[ID'H kj✓[ 757�.:.w �• �} i1✓, l f/LT F l C IAW SHALL M LR ,/A•f Yr r 1A1 '1NJ/-8N/LLD'3 n'YOATM BLRKN fOUY' u 3 DLT[AYINLD HY dNWNLLR u.l rMaNrRu RR t �/f LOFTAF dLTILLX NXLS.GSTIND! �n X r oA sa RlNCS.u3NxD R YANHOLL IIMSN ►�� +755737'w` r�� # r rAeNc oRAUP ---- ��ri '°`• eMrrdxnlr Toe,Y-� YAxHou mDMI sYoorx ox lXsfu t D s. 5 ntrsA r/eNe rFAP f srRWs sYoorx ox MSIDd ANn DUNmI. rYN//ppppr srlL JrJT rrPr a Lnusr ncKR AccMura NrOYISIJt rLu, AND WTSTDI �+ 77�+� INIr➢dx1IL TO P/PL 0YIAr SPdC Jf 4B YN) - (NO 7�7555�BP _ _ roNSTRUn/ CIDCNILL TO PJR vvrxY N SCREEN nu oXv HrrruX ox sua J PFeGrr rnvu sue r. r w.ww IcoNSKurnoN 1 - CONNECTIO wPr AxD rrnurNu rALt Its=.SYOON PALGST CORF o L�� 77777 ii � ww. y 1 1 !I i�Yn(TIPI PJ 15Y yyy`� r N. RrrX tIY[M YORIAR ITYPa it •, fY � Z �S• � ` .• "INn-sxu •ixn-sNr +•'vAR �� �� 55777775`e •�• .7.7Y, YixfYUY a'PIC e•rovson ORIFICE Y>ID[ ] � B'>Ipd dd PLRIOINTLD UNOLR-DNAIN PLATE Y J" MALRNAI. i - ]] I=-- � •'�wNl_J:ddB � [ P�Pr i t PfPl%f11TYR S NIl ,,//_ OFR IOVAL i i OR lDWI.•• !YN/DOf SPLC JtNI YAFln V A YMJ W fu,r TmIV ti �° _ Ltd..PD:LRRtr �E aPaa:a ➢wr` :STIIlPS Bl1VYA3nC •: $ 7 S r BeNCH[S SLL OX)LAB i i/L'PLA ROOT JO NTJ NO GIYdNT P#GST RASd ,/Y• �k SY`•"'u.uwuua �^� ] .. YN S 4YLNT YORTIF PRtGJT Bt AAg • jy I B• revu DU. NfCXM lIN SIAD r-.,.�"i:7• �� L a C'za Im rm ELEVATION rA Dn r#uN[ - _ L L J j SECTIONAL VIPK• • '""r'/`-101 �sroFY srrF YANXou r0 !P - : ' {� � tf• �SIV.RII SI>rR AG/INoll f/s-C.vmTY rAu fNDY fur��l a � DarNr Y=As DxiT N�ra.DA1Tmrc nrnac:mD,r m.ro mTTic F •/� sxul ea xoN-aaRrouKD \ uYrDAva T,Amr .LDru Aa fu rffmHlnuJ `E F-I•$ 1 P/Pl i; m Jnuov vu}°1°•u� whin' a<'�m5 ta</Irw u J u a :�` P,am< 1i 1 g al !f IR.c.n ffwfDPa N.a s,.I rrn<.1r i Nrfr.Y fur �g PNurl Ar,er➢w➢ra.uurr Nafvu ar<Tpaa R fuf T+aa f[R am nn �� t` � Oltr➢1TH CtYINI'YOATM PLAN MALXDN.P � ..mou mm�+S mn o-Rac uran. Qasr x tE 5�4 q sLIPX M STAUClU%IAU- STRU TUBE TABLE K a D,u f✓ ou f�.�• ,.a aK a.m o-Rn fR� �r k �#S� PLAN NEM Z Zip PLAN VIEW Ar rnxxmnoX ro MClAOL PK eda or rNAarDOXN, aelarr rvx.n nuv Ywcu LTNr L.amr nwua....,u lwwfa n Ywru ,J O® D O sraFirii R STAURL SMFY SaIIR 3fA1MrUu JAYd J/Pl AND TYPL Dsmr 11nuAR Gaut u fDDSM eYm,a AS DRUNPlPI-INaD[NTAL TO CONSP.WCIfOx • (PIPES 30' & CIT LARGER) USED BY DIRECTION OF Y ENGINEER ONL ~ o � (YAx vuuds) r.WANsfON Jolts txP/xslox JNl s-are �• ...s. � R-o.s* �A.lo• stOPl J/.•PLR 1T A�7 YAlD1l r0 ixc sAr cur rDCa' PLOT W'f B. m, I NNYINOUS TF AND SjMVA=MUST M WArMUCT60 N 1 SAX Por?/YL I (I/Y lXP l Nr!l CONCKTL) C..�`�• �� U-. 10 A>Ar/AOY TNr PATMAn YNROuDXOUT TM LNTL#ILNCTN ya D- LTIOOT B@J 2 I� M .-Pb1 �L n SOI J/T NOR T$6 TNAN 1fT AMY DIYWSIOX P4K Yf INIX 1Y O I .r[aDLr- JOINT IILLSR AT SO K(YASLrt1Y1 IMIRVALS LXCBID 1C1 r r ' ' a L Mrff PLWSFR R M YD3f B!CONSRUCILD AT ALL Its A-TJONS 1 I PLAN VR>S F.O.a� �AdO' SLOPL s/A'PLR R I /-• ' -- �r FLn.WOUlAR PIIKs RIDUL PUTdd A.J o' f/• )WnDOT B616 NRH IW>LJM CONCAIYL CURB AND Guf1LR ��r, _ r fR'as NINTH J ['oNt CI1F8J sdtrmN A�I ,l-rrr o (TYr) AL_AN !CUIITR 1-1 J. T JNTYRSKTION >/N YNMAEIl CUFB f CUl1dR N r 1 TIrIONr➢TO B-s,p • r I/Y!XP CURB RfIVIW PT rllVlnON TR NwdD pOYd JOIM R n}.) bOrfm fern! m 1 u}Ar CArN t fILmND rta N+ � NOTIS m�r,� Rnr' I v RaN' y„ t e I r/• sunmouNTABLE _ -�--- " THvru roxarlr[cuRB AND nu _- -7 rm i u' ro Lf.v n.v rYr 0 1 •, SECTION A-A i �1 O r��.�..r...�M�A�w "�.' �" p�wrR��✓.... ➢uu r� I.nNarrr a fray �� � _��� �__ram_ "` a �� _ pO m r�rr rnvYDmi w<u Aryaab<ww.er SOFYOUM <• - r s �rre r��rurr� ^ .sr�G� �r�� >uU N..➢vra�<,.a lXPAN510N J01 4 _ �r� - - SIDEWALKS AND TRAILS - - - - z�NNAmlw/s 6'aINYfIIOO , Its[OFTIYCIOII dNLL CONOUCf Drwneu lvD I✓NrYrM YnwrsMi DRYA"C!DIT[AlS XDAIa>RSfD PfAWRlA OIINT TL,P➢.V1fI M rZAR PoLWIfON(VNI1roL AVTMCT(Yq"))lrst#,YCIYtM PRICIICtT(e 1 ro P<RrObbV u s T#T DRYNS>AlK aRv✓AYT JCRrI➢N u r# fDxrROt Sln sIIUTION A#MWSiON INN DRr/1FALI>AR TM ro#NCNB N Mrf f/RR}RDV a,>�s/rr YVtf K ST.rtlULln Sc••,IOYPLY nN}LL CONMION3 AXD Lvvsur,➢N brr9 NufM ro/LL Nv UNLL KIT IIIOY llld PAOP f➢Cd, Its NIMW DlSCxAAcd lXtO PfFNIS 1DfU[D lUR IYl>DAr ro R[Caxrt,[K➢. XC�YAT 1VICr R}tu LI1JfAflON O!lbl YJT 1➢0 LW[LL l�r YusT u<v✓AlTYD -- ISSW}stop Iuf OADtA rOR Ut DMIOIYLNf DOIU AND fHwDlYC >JTxd r.Ywr#/)KA CMwrMWC A}sOv�v NrtA ON N f# sa m#nl➢maN fW XDNLDYru.xv vlrx rNr#YNs✓us urYn k roRrIDNa or.xr rnonRagr aq rfgY}xeNr DlxxeT oR rrus Yosr u SUPIA SLUT AJ r f[YVdtlNC ALL Tlu flMt AN➢➢rAu oasts!!C'ONliev[YfaTUR[S....•.u MYPCSK aI1MX,A bR AKN CQNNMNNC ro}SVNIK Inq u'➢CaNSIFDCr/OII IILE�` NND NKN/ll A- SUPPUL00 DY d5T BROTHERS. SRVCSISN WD sin M MR }OAF OR WOb}.+D LVnR CyM}IyYGVl JRny Mr.P1 r-r Dts/G'fD M<Y➢DVI CILQS�eNS R➢!Jd 5]LT T YANHOLt AANS1># Ort APPA RD dOUAL ro All MAS ILW ATASUSdID H,D.1rrA0rr➢BT rx[fNaw[fa yyQg1f/frn r0 BTANUPLA NrSr}ANS YIAY RL STIelLIlfD IRNW .NC>1TA l'A)5t'.0 YT• CONTACT SURIICIS Ol GSr- IlffR NO AT LONCLR BMNC USID AS}Sa➢IYIM t9xTYxYfnT TIB1fY APPRORD dOnU. CGIAN ANO IDRYT MNTACT S-�TM��J N9 W IttORO4'6>N r�ufY f YL�Y TtlL�r IlNCOfN SLAIILi1KRL5lNI'At L /Atr •. Nlr(IN}AIW R6 ATYU .....u �D,m,WJBA �LT�ri�tY JPIJ X S FLCOYYZNNSIONS If I11NVl#D AJ MR[CffD BY ryl If/DDfrrR JON UI[lr YWT u SrlMtwt➢As SDaX At ' �r Mssm�ro 1JYR 901t uOSNNLH,r w Nn<.ee LYG r R AlflR Its LaNSJII YroN IClfnll IN TNr PoAnoY u rM Sm NT�rt✓,AOIY Vtr W, _ �`�_.�'... '•f • r11YANYNfLT LGStD. I r YllydD rmm ..srorAPll[s Au sroemu AAftT sxul NR Jrzr Kxu aA smM#rRArrwc f 1! srnfrJ Pl.eea Ylov✓D Nr Amu rrRwmR ✓A+NrfN.Ncr}ND utTPrrnoY.uavox rnxnml✓euvR+T exu er YAmnuD BITUMINOUS HEAR COURSE ADJACENT DETAIL - --- r ,[riw�ucvoTWrmm�s rDrn➢N}#IdrR snv}Ltner KrteLlsN✓rNr ar •.'t•-••` NOT ro JCrr• 0.W DTr�o%ru tbMrRA<]OR THAI!INRYl lXllr rllOrrCnaN OM}U s�}Rm)s uTADYA R4 fNTNW.WD TrpOrrMAnu CO✓rADL 4. --- Alfrs W ACC➢RD,NCI nnI ru Cm Sr4wu➢r1fnT R IXIRRILT YVST u u]NSIfLYrn rrrCY}✓D qRW of rgOrfLTIaMrS u�a usn uvIDrD DN AU InOMtrD TXMY Sr RR fr xe�RS a f#J1R NCIMxc a.J drJus 0I wN uPAIRf YUST u YIDr GV rM ddlXf1rS}r f//Lt Y/LLI DUSTS lYYIObTlLY rOl49"NfSKVQIax u SHf URlT.WL[r MO,rCnON✓USJ eL R roU➢>WD by W TM MSPMYH%UNJITIrlIINAT C ON4 NOr S'mr DR6wILAR RIM BINYA'OUS OLPTN IFOPArdD WSlAUCD W A✓tYNdA rYAt/ILL NOT IYlbUNd ILIA NA t rrAwut vl NArD OR GULYYD W I?HW N-HOYAt Of NOnfIG rIM SYUL AKULl fN}srOp PAVLY BJNYINWB rW u W A AUA•NIR TN>PAIJIMJ A/YLAD ro rtN/COulr OR PfOfsllWM RUTM ADYA}N➢%I LID RAV sNUi YY LOY 1RRD}T LtlM}fUCMRJ RPINsf SUBCNDa(IPPAOYID HY CITY) GSnND T/IAll Bl NIrNAN R/DNY ARYLNT A dY TMYINf�JDIS T1H[tl✓IIULTOq SNut JXLWwORIK IfYrVRNT 9lDnur ,] IIDrAL TM C➢xrN[TCJ,e...r.RtLDR/ND➢IJPWf V ILL nYPoNl,Y TYPI"B•SOLD COVIN MR CONCSALtO NNSKO[nDN Tm f0 GP�l R�f�SIOr ru fLa• Cn#AO[YWURtS NP)S NO /.(1• a ('W STq BITUI NOVSIdWHC OURSI 1GptL frYur#nMiD c x IrxT R>tr H.f0Nri>s.N,.}u N f rCPM rSF r1P mourxT A/ufYOr Aw utc➢POsLCNnf•rLwT NNamCrtl fNrouC u✓0IrD D SaurixLnT i}NtsD D iL t mT"ON"ND Nmr. AYNYNt YCtN,,utrosRr YOA yraA arsTrY meJ}V r IUrNC:/O FrnnfYJrc rcxfA xNrsrDrf m}mDAX[G nuo.fC f s3r#vDD.N iro}Tg KR JKRT DU y #gMAwM 1'BITUMINOUS /YfTNUqbDI R K'CIerOuK3.o mSm rN TeNn }N MrmxDfw -`b W-RELATIVE CURB STOP LOCATION u5AJ x AL UcRm 0r rlwnNux¢UnD AND nllArS SX/U u K nvrD a s2nlfrn LBO✓TINS I RINIL IIS THROUGH.mr CONTI4CNR SHIu ALmR TRAY SIKF,MfI SI B� R AND Yf/IICIf UNDfIIGRRUDI PIVM ro LInNa rM sm ROlfnp%YNSORfT}Nn 1BORdlCJILY IIIIJA M sLOgY uRA sysrfY ti CRnd ADNSTfND NNDS- NOTIS R SIRfR JKIrwC IU. Wtn 1a A-ro rxt Srar/#NUL ROVllJ S�AID!nKY/s 914U.N roYPIdIQT uYORD M'D UlANW Jf Md WLfrf. �� '/xN-SNdlLO.3 YlN 1 RMDs,Y}Y Ol W!D!OR COYSYPIMlfON 1pmrYJ.NT AND WY>Alu surrUYS d...r.of CINNID AND m>NSrR[IY OI NCN WTIlY.APAIP AND fJ.OIIT/IrNY 0R dQOAI 1Pllr0.T INCLUDMD aROVl SIf AP)LY BINYINN3 TALK Ca1T. RtDD1u luPueraOXl/S➢wtCnD rn Tl9X tNGMfIA N NfIIN _ Y� NCN NN0 AlID WSTIND/N O NOTLJ ATM fY➢Ol NCY aORAAO by flit CM OR fNCl✓l!A 14l pA➢A IDNJI➢NAL N. BlD Of NOX-3NNNX DROOP YADOT SPLC YJtT NqH YAxRt'AF ARf A1:UfABIl JROY CITY YLALL m A➢dPoSLT S tPp6 N T#3K[fR A.T OrfYID ArDVlRu AT nfKIaIJR%,aRA<'rM farHsl 0 II mrv.&UT P W zL # 1D D/RH CIiICX lMuOLL e/ANIIT 3RTrH1.NOAOLL AND a1 tTT SISRLIS TNALL Br -'-','-'-•+�''-S • IUU.DLPM ro rtTABLSN} 1.NRB YARRNW-Ba PorI D M TM TAQ Of HL CDRB. AOTXTrOY r LOM'NCIfOA s,U[t,L✓bW ro5!!M er }S tNfi.'N CA[CrT aN1Y W TIIWJ[D LOunus IS APKOvrO s1 NNT LNd fAOY INCX ro 111 lNd CONCRfK!T M A PIA-STArr.PLRP1-WZ0N N frlF P/NAIN c[INADVGIOUf r#LTr I)Yt nYf9 WI POINK YnMM}MD ALONO rqr Cjrr yr<j- 9lOFM3T IA[AroT TO N UHIJPfD T MNJ.YIRr TL By NOR � - � dXTLND fHf MR>ORY LDfinON 0I LURD STOPS �IR IAl lOAJSALY MOAIDYLD 1Iw LOMTNLTOR s1Yµ u 1LfsPoMlnr. .WD C➢NJMVn1O✓TIeVIIC nLCUR I MarILXS SHALL#VL CONatdld PfD RAMPS AT ALL STRAIT - TuIIVNRY DHYHfS.PwwC W DKK IMAMT ro NMCMAn fPOPIR 11A11NIL[ fNrLSICnoNs • S Illr#BekT CURB R uS[D.P CI CURB YANAIM OY PCr Of CURB DUAwC CONSIR➢CIIOX A DAOfM/Ar19➢VPLI CRIDID AA44 fAa✓nuMON,rOpD Y PADmnr a--start ro fuurrAM roMrrve DAax.DL AIr fro✓ BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ADJACENT DETAIL .LNDsYr KsrixrPL�<f[D Rw Rexrrur➢rrrr aR w.Ne�� I➢[NALK NROUCNOUT LINC}N Ol IALr NOT M SCAM r.R➢rlCf TNf LYrwtnYD DRADf AND YWaUb JItJ IN nH RW/n!I (FOR CURB STOPS) GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL PLANS - Gall 48 "ours before digging: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or aall811 Com 20121161OTP06 dwg Common Ground Alliance oetc 03/28/13 street 16 oP 23 w Wuaoad Pr,""7I SwlAwt Inc I e-.eT al1LT W+MY pbe rPTAItl q..or�.M Savona Tetlnar." ar,.e aYe P•P�rl+m••a W.1 r.m.ADh n. .nae®wuL Dar�l� Osfp.k C LI Ptellared for. PrYria,uN- IIi44»1K mda!W 4w d tlr Sub d YUorva p5JI PNL /, xJw ennar Corporation Details PAX 951-931-582f Plrr¢ ITW TOu r1rEP ,>aB.931.11. Ryan M Btuhm Re-d Dr b,brld- 16305 36tmo Avenue North Suite 6t10 Westwood �„�p— wm 06/14/13 ly N 41257 Plymouth,MiTmnesote,55446 Lake Elmo.Mirmeeo[a o2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. !_ IDTInON JR,'[,utYN'/LOJAnOx SILT CURruX s rY UIILILD IXIr COxsTRIInION S r-Sw-YFTAL£CNC£POST NOT, YA/NTA/N AND aI oVr DRTCCS AS N£CfS 1 �nIRTIfJ OCt9R D/A[Cnt ADLC4'T A L+IG:s_ OR IFTLI,xs p�0♦u�rA (NFLR YL SI /LVNSTNUCl/ON TA_C) A ACNILV£PROPCR IIOY O!STORY IAT£R WJII STOFY SYST[Y xtlR JM LIUS M IORtlNC A/L,.9 rM usTLL4 nJN I %SIG%.ILL WJW%ID A M.G W[NLS 0I ipP50/L MNNRYINC A OR Y•+L•IppO PoSt JUT[UMIlMJ 16t Y aY¢WRAO DJNnaD RT THY Cfn 1'NGP'ffA yytpl.,� r lILTFR ISSYYBL OTW OOxCRtTi,undlY OM19T u LMD I.vD 50I1D r.ms caxlLTYD Jr cwQfTt yArIYBy PoLYL m SLSIIL A Ir,R-PRroI cvxT,+MYLxT T,CNTr t P".1 ALC M"SLIL'A 1X£ 23 SPLC/liro Nr%!N AND AuNFIN UNnt +OR tlIPl1WtULr LMA,caYVlnYa C4 YNG LILT DOas xOT A/ADY YASbaUf STAIrr MSTAI/Cr10N is MYPIdTID pF9p LxWOs A tHRR CRaaxD Y ml IJ fOMSRVRYD AM fYPLAYLIBL LWIR.TM IJ9Wa IIN�"�t IHD JOLO I/sT s LUST NOT LONTAn T/u GOVNA.,ND TXW YIISr NOT aT aUxOlr _ ,A, �y TROY TYf MMrlffl uyYOOT aPaRlnays OR A....L¢um um ALa t,ms YUtT J YA1ALL s a Pl AXD%PAIR OR%rLCt AS N,dDFO OA%OUl%D A N PAOPIRLT IND.CDYPULAFCY q!/I YPT!RtceuTtONs•SICX AR)sl llxfn ll MN XIS ddN fSlABLISNID. IaLW'T A fACN [/LTT A WIO.tY Nx[ALfr LpA/P+IINT YRLlt iHf PAMTA!oLms. I.%SARAnON 10%SNILi BICIX YRXIN>MYS Ol lIN6 GRADING O VN J A YIN=.N t A—Ol SOD SNILL BI PU AD£ACINT A THt BACX Ol 12-.I ppiNr•A'YVST BE \\ MRBS AIDNC ALL BOUIdYARDs Sitar r2XCa SHILL 8[PIA DI%CTW %HWD III(SOA 1N ACMRDANCr YIJTI T%Clm STANDARD DtTIILs ` III yo1 EYB[D SrNa4 IN CAWMO NSNCR 1+1,II RdNi'B' I HOULdtiUID AND OIIL'H%SAluf/ON lXCLODLS 11mr GRADING.YNICH WCLUDLS THL III �[Iplt Or I �•YW 10_ IL•YW 6 DRI/NACU RaAS.D(BAIS WA SOLI CNUNNS.IN)1.r YA)NTLNfND PoSITAt COlfPlfmD II dA� ILSSLYBLYM i SBYD R A`OMLL\ I W/XCO AD-23 OR APPROVED EQUAL II D(lLtCIOR rota eroTrnlGr rIa I OIl -CrNTu M UNDrRNL rH Aar 'AM-As.aYALr TLDR OYI%V-rOP or NOT:s Mm.". r I $ CURB— 0 YAXIYUY IIDTH Or CONrmUtllON Immef 15 N Pm Ovt w TXAOUGH Sb - T-,2'RooD STAKE N.RLTIR ASSfYHLY 0 A Yxmr ms mPt v onrtrtnt PA c S1Lit m usa UNDIR rxt T1tL'v`N ylA III a o °°nE,ir B°" cuAB Aorx ro P%vsXr ncwnax al mr uxnrunXe som rxro rxr SANE t UI m MSYRUMVenM"a STA%T 9xnU=r Is�STArILTI•W.NIl NOYr N07S -JILT P(XCa WSTALGfION SHALL MIm A � 1, 0 CDNSTRUCTION lX1R.INCL SXALI,BL JIAINTII.v[0 A P%LINT TR.I CIT/NG YHDofYr>r.J.Tr➢I Cl/Cr A YINICfI/MNJTRUtTtW(1RArrit. Ol YVA OXTO ROAarAYS THIT INOW T%PFOlafl' MIS— TYPl CI AT ALL OTHfF LOr TIONS %ow%➢MONC AP ON£SSfNO Fm ADDITIONIL ADCX M%LOYAL -WttFLIS SHALL MNrORY A YNDOt 9Ba6. M-M Rff.H-1LOI AND"XSZUA,1ON or Wt—LNTRM'cr IJ'OP V mI Y Ol Er-,-_��r ®RrYOYI YUD AHD Dr.TROY TI%S AND VaBICLI UNDCPTiARLca tN1VI1(iXIT SlIIR Dpts XOT PUSS DOIA fLOr lABR1C rNON m LLAWM T%M. T%TmrR ROIL TROY lTs ruL."Mr' WINCO CC-23 HIGH-FLOW OR APPROVED EQUAL GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL PLANS SITE RESTORATION PLANS Ca1W'DF CONSfRUCTH)N rrNCI S4 UND IAmA SfUr-Olt AND SrAnm YARMRS.NILD IN Po$ffiDN ~ y I S2Ne J [N I f Bt J T-SMIPrO Ylflt rFNCf PosfS k$EiE_ aa"1••� IBap_• F I 13I/ID SUR%CL UTILTY"SIYINr LWL ___ M !! e 4 IN IFD e E as` g E Jill � + _—M R N— ----------- ` IYN/„)srroALues)R 5gg b \I� 1•DIP DRAWntC MRPORAJION sT0 I 1� .H,7 �i. � 1 YN r �_ Trc PYRrmu+o,oOT Dup mB e a@ r+• k�� ... .. �wOmmT 1M m,l Pun, �� r£R srancr. k ovy PPn DDIx V MP'E 6I U ov -C a Le. rT IR,T E PADYlItm WAS SA YI r£RYu a E~ LNl '0 YAr ft nona - C� yaC MI.Y I of Pre s scX net e• 3a rArr rAer re BDuuvAAD { r Amle.rr.w.c,....,e.�,..,„..,.a.,,A,n r,r,e,.w 1u9ru o'JAL: Sa" 5�• r/R!d$OB zr- + ,,.,v,,.JO..r.r„A L• anl m o�rrniu'xFe31'AIR�c-reDTHr an aLKY.R,armal+n,a sAMrARr srre apq +a e•or mRna1 S(PARAnox Bmaan M sAN111 1 Z��C +•�'^'��rr "'�zA�m z�Non etRvofr�Xo' DnoirirA�s�AAias" a'1hArNr xID Y suOrARr srrrR sartr - _ € a en aNuarnl 1OC""""•°Pa•O,:m,a.IVNT,+xr DInN a»-..PDI.T.,R.0 I Call 48 Hours before digging: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or ca11811.com 2DI2116TOTP07 dr+g Common Ground Alliance oeta: 03/28/13 Sheek 17 op 23 ��. w.Q,aDdPeolWmtl s.wac n E Y^K7.ary R,r Prepared for. Savona rp99 NAaDrr-D^.. dA.a�..r mr�,m.Jdr Yusd PROPYSAONAL a„1a+,k QL Lennar Corporation Details O6/II/I]R,pw pb Ofr COTn,lnl, CLs}ed A\Ce fiW PHONE 9629JT-5,60 rsR 95;-9aT-5R21 �� tau mae ,aeR.aaT.s,so Ryan K Blubm tl 4 D—L.1r/d.+. 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Westwood YANww.--dp.— D" 06/14/119 nod.w 41257 I I Plymouth,Mb=esota,55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professtonal Services. Inc NN y}p �O a+M ta0 r�r�'1 Cpai tl OOO ON hO�D �N to a]' AD00' S)O a�0 vj n". u'iF[OY W•^". nq DO m--NNoaO o•-O ... mow), t�.'0. - i[J_a0 •O:N. n..: O - ND'd - s mod i f 1 0) 0 O 07 Oy} Doo o -...- zoo ocx o o ri0 0 O � mrn rn0P oP P 1035 PN 9F.MrOt00 M p[v�00?Yl 0. 9111 030 ,>om 025 ------------- 0 0 2�, 1015 k� F$ es 010 -------- - a ,-_--- --- 105 r` _ j'SU��•�NW 000 M nlv'�P�90 - •Mm'W 95 90 8 a 85 v yid 980 F ON II[v��Pp�lW S V. 75 70 ess 65 60 g� 1 --------- 55 ---- ------- I 50 5 0 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 5IH STREET NORTH 1075 pp pp oo �O U'7 ON n� O Nh NN r.0 DQppI NO TN MO rfa WW W <O r.0 �< �1` ON �O Nu0'1 •n0 107 Nn MM NM N ) PnIM MM CO" N)7 NN NN NN �N rP mN NN NN Y N NN t N NN tNl fOV N'a 0 0 00 O 0 0 0 0 00 DO 00 00 O O 00 00 00 00 00 O O 22 00 00 00 00 O O 106 PN Sfl..•J+09W M A. 1.OEi� 106 Boa K� 105 105 104 8 104 103 10Q0 I Q25 -__---___ � ' Call 48 Hours before digging: 101 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance 101 47 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 0 100' 200' 300' 57H STREET NORTH NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20721161pTP02 awg o.ec 03/28/13 slimb 18 OF 23 S.A."1.ir atllr 9w NY pL.w PY N9 9r wF a mdr n Prepared tar. Savona aJ Lennar Corporation Preliminary r999�nN••o m.s Pgw.ww.r d,r c...a.H use Hama+a odst E09n PryIrN,MN 557NF IIfaa/���9w MA d Ne 99m d WudN 95/1)/•J R.wFw Ps alY r.MTw�ti 9p/�F/�]RMe.M OIY Cmxnrt\ � R]al PHONE 95�-9d)-S1&1 FM 9.t-9J)-5.f1 oti9� xw Street Profiles TOLL �a 37-61w Ryan M Htvhm 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Vkshviood vw+K paaan D� 06/14/13 uawP xe 41257 °md wa•tu 6PidPle Plymouth,Mimmesota,55446 Lake Elmo.Minnesota o2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Call 48 Hours before digging 99 9 811 or call811.com Common Ground Alliance 1100 � 1100 ,n 0000 a.o 18 ao goo u3o mo no 00 oW r3o mo no 1 nn a. '� ''i pp 'n 8p 0 0 .-ar3 i(yN O+N fo0 �W aD0 NV' �O n WtA r7.: Q bIA WO 0P-n M`LO a ON O) CJ+G MN Nm 64 NN N� O 001 +DO ADO u30 NK3 --� 095 10900 00 00 00 00 00 _oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ^o 00 00 00 00 0^ o0 1090^ f f P�_Me„p f 090 10 — .xaea m r;ism 1085 IpDa K .]pm 80 108 --- lP E+Y:"-,—. 1 7 --- -- 075 �:»m - �B H'-- 107 m.K K e, $ 070 1 O6 a em a xr_H m°i"1e :e sJA_x up0.m KP .N�pp"p 065 y ++000'K aD� m OM�v:1pjppmp `� M ILv 6vle� AO..-Amx 1 QE K w 060 1058 055 105' � -LL7x7 050 104 --r ------- $ e IQ45 104940 1 Q35 035 1030 030 1025 --_ 025 102 — 0 0 10 5 — 015 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 STREET A 109 1095 ,. P, m0 M1V) o� Nr a+? °'°' N6J Na, 1090 1 00 1100 109 ° cr wm rna� a no v<i NK3 mad as <a iF3a u3m 12 o o +nin w-- 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 -ita ----- NN +nY NI A"i W.W .. .. 108^^ 1085 109 o0 L 00 0o 00 1095 1080 080 109 1090 107 "'�=" °° `._ 075 1085Ao"' 1085 PY b1.Nmm 107 °'°° LL _. _ 070 10 0 1080 10651065 107 �___.,_1075 1060 , 60 107 _ yx a j 1070 8 L 5 t 1055 x§ __ 8_ - _ __.—LQ55 1 6 -_ c 065 1050 -- ---" �___ 050 106 0 0 1045 - --- 045 1055 -------1055 1040 __—_ 040 105 ---- 050 1035 1035 104 —-____1045 1030 n 030 1040 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STREET B STREET B �Zo--Q0• NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 201211610TP03 d.q nam 03/28/13 shoat 19 of 23 Prepared Savona Preliminary W-***d 11 t —1$.M."ins. 3 he.q.eery Wr u`plo,../+eF.r b••_®e•� Ba�falaosa for. 16BB•na0•vP Drive dhex.Pev1�a asd dW I m.day arced PlaPa�efiAL Dede+ek OJ Eden PlRlne.AW GSW4 > Ode de leR d dY aetl d IEm.m OS/t J/i3 fte,:v.Pe GtY Cpnmml+ O6/+'/3 Rewen ps G'v G>mm.n' >� Lennar Corporation PHONE 962-93T4'S0 5a2x Street Profiles IM 90-031. tau mEE 'aaaa31a1m Ryan M.Bluhm - 76305 mo Avenue North Suite 600 Westwood , D— 06/14/13 u�Np 41257 Plymouth. Minnnesota.55446 Lake Elmo,MinnesotaWkistwvod c 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call ours before digging 811 or call811.com 1080 1O80Common Ground Alliance N r, n Co h r, p 0a�0 M00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00t 00 0! ,pO n I, 0 1' 11 N r 10 a. 1 0Q 107 art '^ � N 76 n N nN N �NNN' INCN N conAz NM rMn n NM N i" 0 N NN 075 00 00 00 00 00 107 rNJ n a n T 7 ^^« N[ _____.... 075 1070 �%°*`•°= 1070 00 00 00 00 00 0o 1 7� .P�•-a m 070 106 b..K 065 vx acv.,a,al _,axm o. sow 1065 ,.K 1065 10 n;:�;;� 060 �—-�> °�„'9;° 1 60 S 1060 105 g $ 0 5 1 Q55 a -----------1055 105 I.TI s#— 050 ''i:nm " ` "• ri,sri:it eim m�< �i� - - - 1050 104 105 045 104 $s --- - 45 1 4 ' $ 040 104 , -------- 40 1 3 _- 1\ ea ! 035 a - g 035 1 3 y g� 1 03 1030 103 f ------.1030 1 -- - _ 1025 102 025 1 2 `'Z� 1020 1020 0 0 101 -----_--_ -- - 1015 1015 015 101 1010 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 STREET C STREET D 1070 aaII 070 ODn NN N^ M4a Nm NIA 'in1030 _ 1030 106 roi nn rrA of rri oci o_0 o .1' og 065 o 0 0 o o pp pp m m _A n O_O DO o 00 as 00 ao O OS o4o O MO •'IO O MO ns ,^'O Mm _m Om Nm 102 � �n n� 4g utipp o� 0 moi oo mai -- 0 5 1 60^ mpt�� mK5 mpp ma mq1 mm oo mpf - < 060 m mm mm m� mm mm m0 mm Mg mm mm 1020 LQ20 ,NarW MpLLY-�W 101 "•:gin _ IM5 1 Q50 050 -w ` 1010 _. 0 0 1045 1045 $ 1005 ' s 005 i 10 ° 040 1040 1040 K 1000 1000 1035 035 103 N d am 1035 - 0 00 as 1030 030 103 1030 99 $-__-- e$-- - --- ' ' _ _ '__ 95 Imar< SNY: , 9 ' f 9 1025 °�, s 0 5 10 0 5 g 102 020 10 1020 98 8 98 1015 - s; $ 015 101 ----- - 015 1 10 `� t § 010 101 ---- _ 010 97 75 ---------- - €a 7 __970 1005 - 005 1 QQ5 005 1 2 3 4 96 965 1000 1000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 STREET E STREET E STREET G 0, 100' 200' 300' NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161OTP04 Awq D w 03/28/13 sheer: 20 os 23 y Prepared for. Savona Lennar Corporation Preliminary ` Eswss a,.crm om. ae.a wP...w.ma mr I.m.my Ise naee®ow.c o.dw� aL Pt• <,IIe 6631s ��w4r lb<Im d Mt 9m PI�� OS/i)/i]eM«Pr GIY Lanmsil< P. RICO PRONE 95Z&t)6,60 „� BSA3� D.— „w Street Profiles Tau-Ply Id 3?41M RYea M.Hluhm Ref Dn,.lsw Wd— 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Westwood www.weru<o.ka�mm — 06/14/13 r>�r xo 41257 Plymouth,Minnesota,55446 Lake Elmo,Minneeota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 4. nN ^r m N a ,n Co �o vN Call ours before digging 10 uyN N nn N On mr -p No, 811 or cal1811.com00� a E 65 M 0M Pi7 NN O� 00 oD0 IN g W^W d 1P < 00 0m o' mm m n Q 0 � N Common Ground Alliance m me, ON CIO om 0,N , . Ta, elm Tm 01N MC, 0101 0,O a, 1060^ k,s;r.,MA 0 1 Q55 1050 1050 10453 105 1040 1040 1035 1035 1030 1030 1 25 1025 102 10 -- - 1015 *w s.•swdm w�uer_9RY1 — 1010 ` 1005 1005 td .1 wm 1000 000 - f s n „ n 95 x _ 995 990 - 990 985 i G __—- —985 s 980 _ y� x` 98 97 97 970 ------------_97 96 s� 96 / - ., { — ----96 955 955 950 1950 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 STREET F 101 1010 ^� oc�v a e a a a m m m �n nr .$ ^n f.ty �� N� ,O— mN Nor NM Mo' 100 Oa �avps n�35 Rn �r �. �e o0 'o� 0, s� Ln _ .. 005 m Oct) gig, gi th atn mrn rnw mm mm corn rnrn m rnrn mO rna 1010 1010 100 000 M,,SpUy Nar.90 1 kN 005 9900 gin b' ._.-_.._. m .__ morn y 1000 000 99 $ yg _ � w Nr sa.,wsm , • � .n E1tr.9]da M fM_]•,Am .,�- �/ �' � � e � �'�._- LP F.1_Mt1W r:DE"�nisRa -Y . E Pwn+->.nm 99 R_, .m 95 98 rM E%-A- YJ ,R...mR mar K ................. 990 _ 90 98 t 8 98 t g 85 97 g a __..-._.._ 75 :,,. 980 80 97 � ._._______--979 s7 -- 75 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION ---- 970 _-, 70 96 t a 60 9 5 65 95 - -------- _ 55 1 2 3 4 5 0, 100' 200' 300 STREET H 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 _ 1750 2012116iD7P05 dwg STREET art 03/28/13 SLRR[ 21 OF 23 �`. wEPr>qtln.9e vOm9 nN M PEo.iaaopidr rlPa•v,.m dM 2DNdn 5dr5aw.L5W•8]S2 -A Nr �> ]��o,�de�16e 4Wwal,d dura sBIWe xdo Y.IosLL nO0S6//.tl,m]•//1,.1J RR,Mvrtr.PCss cDdIyY DDePmnmmum,tla, mrmdatR�o,R,.mR sia.� IO® Savona II ddyvr ® Lennar Corporation Preliminary 95]9 � Street Profiles es ]ou + e9-]9,-] s,m Ryiui M Bluhm 1605 36 Avenue North Suite 600 YfeStWOOd --. 06/74/I3 4� PrepIor. Plymouth,Mlnnnesota,55446 Ialce Elmo,Minnesota 68 a d';, it,• ° ar Da I►`I►fie Oa �'� +►f► �j 4 V�> 7►` •� �/6. 1 Ir ill � � � �� � � � ♦1 �� '-lI - O V► VAR: 1 . : 1 11�� -t as �������mi�r:��.v������s��rl��L '<Y 1► �'• riv�a��,`ry��wa����warawl� _tip :►� IS !���� � d�„ - � /1\:1 i�O � t � .f►f "'� I•;• �v, ,� � ♦ �l�:,ice'4� P�♦ �;� �'�. _,� .: �� � ��1f �►�� � ,� /Ire 'ri• qi :• �:�� �� �• di'w.:. � /' a> ����i S � � � O � -f��!P• �! +[►`�o�i .► i v � � � yp��twi. �1�. 'f► a�i� i/R ����� - ► It :� :V �. s' :�f�•4 ��� �,.` �•.. •1► �Q,��� 4 `.�1i f► •n� ���°�o0i>�►+�;yi'B Lyry=91• ..i-...i-...i..�=..._ILA . � � •ar .►� a IL• � i►. •.' /N /�• i11e1 _ �. �. "_ __ � _ ����� O♦`' �, .i` � 4{. P� �♦ ;per, � � 1� � ��' ���� :► 1�:1 �! �wo�:!�wit=L�����'�� -s �� �.`6i ••, .r' �.. � ��/� � .► •�. `` 4N 1► �i,• � 1►��1i! ....... .. .. .. ri Ina _ - �� 11\ � al:•► � '-�Oj O� �j7�� �•��, ,� +� I� Ih � 'V/0• 1�• iL: :' '1� �, r��. /��� fir`-1.�ri ".��:��:.:� ,�� `� :r►� � f►/►�1 � ,j1. `► 'jig ee 11� `�" \�. � ill• •7: .'►• �� �w Iri-114.G NO PRO milli Savona �. ,� •♦ �1 b� �;t`` 4� 11t� � mac' ����"""" ,. a�.11.; loaf d`:, . ..••�''�o� - `1► _ ', Ali � `�O _ =� ,*ws 1►ri �! 1 . '�►� 1 - !ii�� �► �/ i r°.�`•': �' •,. •,; ' . 1►. I�a ,t♦ 1.� - - `, '•- a •,� �► :,oaf �� �`s, L� Ile '� •,�`' 4�,,/ Ir- �i �. .`,` �►�� ' i�'�i e..,_?.moo,.• +►.L_ ���:�`=' ���. � 1 •11 !. Lake Elmo, 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 46 Hours before digging 811 or call8ll.com Preliminary Plant Schedule Common Ground Alliance PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED SYMBOL OTY COMMON/BOTANICAL NAME SIZE BRANCHES PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER - I OVER$TORY 690 Sugar Maple/Acer socthorum 2 5"Be -- I GUYING AND STAKING AS REQUIRED. Autumn Doze Maple/Acer x freemanii'Jeffers Red' 2.5"Be - FOR ONE V)YEAR ON ALL DECIDUOUS AND CONIFEROUS TREES: Northwood Maple /Acer eubrum 'Northwood' 25"Be _____ __ _2� _.._ _ TOP STAKES 5'ABOVE GROUN❑ Skyline Honeylvmst /Gledilsio triaconlhos inermis'Skycole 2.5"Be - (MAk.)OR 70 FIRST BRANCH Northern Pin Oak/Ouercus ellipsoidolis 2.5"Be w - rN, a•"-�- _ y}�.- ..._.r. ,a ra .a. BOTTOM OF STAKE 3-(MIN) ' ! ; - _ - -•='L _ --•` �� - BELOW GROUND STAKING Red Oak /OuerCus rubro 2.5"Be 'd p, 'pep, 9 ,e - �yM1• :�I .M P,— 6:' TS TO BE 2"%2"STAINED Swamp While Ook /Ouercus bicolor 2.5"BB •- _ '' i` _ - -_ _Yr WOOD OR PAINTED L Bur Oak/Quercus maCrocarpo 2.5"BB _ __ ._. -.__.-,- ^.y._..._"_...u_.e. ___-__- INEATOR POSTS. PLACE 3 _ _ _ DEL 356- _ c ]• - � __..- � \ Mockberry/CeIUs ocadenlolig 2.5"BB 11• -1 9$e - �� L g�; �,.-�.9�42 4 I N, i' POSTS EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL Boutevortl Linden/Lbo americans'Boulevard' 2.5"Be • ° - —� D.-( .-• ,p. \ a _ SECURE TREE TO POSTS WITH Greenspire Linden /Title cordala IGreensp re 2.5'Be r � 16"PO LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR DIscov ry Elm /Ulmus d"dicna var japonica 'Discovery 2.5"Be 966 'W W/WTC ' I � 1, POLYETHYLENE,40 MIL.I$" ••w° �� WIDE STRAP Princeton Elm /WE americans 'Princeton 2.5"Be z �:Wj _�' \ {q,• �� ., PLACE MULCH.DEPTH AS L •• / r, I SPECIFIED OVER PLANT PITS- ORNAMENTAL 153 River Birch /Betuto nigro 6'HT.,Be CLUMP l m ' r s ; \ i I I •�" DO NOT PILE AGAINST TRUNK Thornless Cocks ur Hawlhorn Crola p / egus crusgalh'Inermis 1 5"Be FORM 3'DEEP WATERING BASIN (.THY,p JCDOnese Tree L4aC /Syringo rel,Nlola 6'HT.,Be CLUMP f- id' a % >�p \\ j•.� BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH �� 11 Allegheny Serviceberry/Ameloncher loevis 6'HT,Be CLUMP SPECIFIED BACKFILL SOIL Whil"pire Birch /Belulo popuhfollo 'Whitesp,re' 1 5 BB _ 240-- SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF Proirlefae Crab /Molus'Praeiehre' 1 5"BE / _ r- l/, a ,, •' - ;_ 944 •- `I I _ - HOLE Pfusi 'Profusion' FOR NUR 1 5"66 7'.p + + daM1 0 ` ` - •�a A,--• ---•—y46 , I y REFER NURSERY STOCK FOR ow G now'Profusion Crab /MoWs AMERICAN STANDARD Spring Snob /Malus'Spring S 15"BB MINIMUMO BE PLANTEO AT OR OR EVERGREEN 385 Block Hills Spruce/Plceo glouco denseto 6'HT.,68 'Id ' - 1 NEAR FINISHED GROUNDLINE _ Colorado Green Spruce /Piceo pungens 6'HT.,68 1 W. yA--- I SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED Austrian Pine /Pinus nigro 6'HT,68 1g 3 _ SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL 0 MOUND MATCHING TREES NATURAL Norway Fine /Pinus re5naso 6'HT,88 J_ - - - -4+4-- GROUNOLME W1 FINISHED WITH SITE SCOIth Pme/Pinus sytveslris 6'HT.,Be A,�u 976-" nM1 e - ftHemxr /' GRADE N.T.S. EVERGREEN TREE RENSaJPineWhite Pe /Pinus stroDuS 6'HT,Be tAST - PLANTING LA29 NOTE: QUANTITIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE LIST QUANTITIES IN THE EVENT OF A DISCREPANCY \ w _ 97 as• PRUNE OUT MISDIRECTED BRANCHES PROVIDE ONE CENTRAL LEADER F GUYING AND STAKING, AS REQUIRED. FOR ONE OECIDUOUSt nN0EAR CONIFEROUS TREES ON ALL Planting Notes TOP STARES 5'ABOVE GROUND f ' _ (MAX)OR TO FIRST BRANCH 60TTOM OF STAKE 3'(MIN.) 1 CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER"ONE CALL"(651-454-0002 or 800-252-1166)TO VERIFY LOCATIONS OF ALL BELOW GROUND STAKING POSTS V TO BE 2'XZ'STAINED WUUU OR UNDERGROUND UTILITIES PRIOR 70 INSTALLATION OF ANY PLANTS OR LANDSCAPE MATERIAL PAINTED STEEL DELINEATOR r 2_ ACTUAL LOCATION OF PLANT MATERIAL IS SUBJECT TO FIELD AND SITE CONDITIONS J _ e fa Q . POSTS J 4 •1 y POSTS PLACE 3 EQUIDISTANT AROUND AND OUTSIDE ROOT BALL SECURE 3. NO PLANTING WILL BE INSTALLED UNTIL ALL GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION HAS BEEN COMPLETED IN THE IMMEDIATE AREA a `•�•' ' I r_ TREE TO POSTS WITH 16"LONG POLYPROPYLENE OR 4 CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE TWO YEAR GUARANTEE OF ALL PLANT MATERIALS. THE GUARANTEE BEGINS ON THE DATE POLYETHYLENE.40 MIL.15' OF THE LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT'S OR OWNER'S WRITTEN ACCEPTANCE OF THE INITIAL PLANTING REPLACEMENT PLANT WIDE STRAP MATERIAL SHALL HAVE A ONE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING UPON PLANTING TREE WRAP MATERIAL FROM l a�} - •) GROUNDLINE UPWARD TO FIRST 5 PLANTS TO MEET AMERICAN STANDARD FOR NURSERY STOCK(ANSI Z601-2004 OR MOST CURRENT VERSION) BRANCHES,AS REQUIRED REQUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIFIED PLACE MULCH.DEPTH AS SPECIFIED. OVER PLANT PITS-DO NOT PILE 8 PLANTS TO BE INSTALLED AS PER MNLA&ANSI STANDARD PLANTING PRACTICES. \ P� r,,•( AP p ETER AGAINST TRUNK FORM 3'DEEP WATERING BASIN. 9 PLANTS SHALL BE IMMEDIATELY PLANTED UPON ARRIVAL AT SITE. PROPERLY HEEL-IN MATERIALS IF NECESSARY; BACKFILL PLANT PIT WITH SPECIFIED TEMPORARY ONLY y91 %• '''` - �' r1: I BACKFILL SOIL SCARIFY SIDES AND BOTTOM OF HOLE 10.OPEN TOP OF BURLAP ON BB MATERIALS. REMOVE POT ON POTTED PLANTS, SPLIT AND BREAK APART PEAT POTS I _ - REFER TO AMERICAN STANDARD FOR 11 PRUNE PLANTS AS NECESSARY- PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO CORRECT POOR BRANCHING OF EXISTING NURSERY STOCK FOR MINIMUM BALL AND PROPOSED TREES f• SIZE ROOT FLARE TO BE PLANTED EXISTING '' - / ] F e • AT OR NEAR FINISHED GROUNDUNE +2 ,a- T�.• 12 STAKING OF TREES AS REQUIRED: REPOSITION,PLUMB AND STAKE IF NOT PLUMB AFTER ONE YEAR a TREES TO ��( `L. J SET ROOT BALL ON UNDISTURBED R�`M %. SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOUND 13. THE NEED FOR SOIL AMENDMENTS SHALL BE DETERMINED UPON SITE SOIL CONDITIONS PRIOR TO PLANTING LANDSCAPE MATCHING TREES NATURAL _ r CONTRACTOR SHALL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR THE NEED OF ANY SOIL AMENDMENTS GROUNDUNE WITH FINISHED SITE GRADE. N.T.S 14 BACKFILL SOIL AND TOPSOIL TO ADHERE TO MN/DOT STANDARD SPECIFICATION 3877(SELECT TOPSOIL BORROW)AND TO WOMO •T ' DECIDUOUS TREE �Au o5 . BE EXISTING TOP SOIL FROM SITE FREE OF ROOTS,ROCKS LARGER THAN ONE INCH,SUBSOIL DEBRIS, AND LARGE WEEDS PLANTING LA28 UNLESS SPECIFIED OTHERWISE MINIMUM 4"DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR ALL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12'DEPTH TOPSOIL FOR TREE, SHRUBS, AND PERENNIALS '� J •;" I, •yA Y� 15.MULCH TO BE AT ALL TREE.SHRUB,PERENNIAL. AND MAINTENANCE AREAS TREE AND SHRUB PLANTING BEDS SHALL HAVE 4" DEPTH OF SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH. SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH TO BE USED AROUND ALL PLANTS Landscape Requirement Calculations WITHIN TURF AREAS PERENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS BEDS SHALL HAVE 2"DEPTH SHREDDED HARDWOOD MULCH &� •r ,� r,, } •; PF - 'µ •• _` �• 7 MULCH TO BE FREE OF DELETERIOUS MATERIAL I •� a A, ti •- •,1 u LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: 16 EDGING TO BE SPADED EDGE,UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. SPADED EDGE TO PROVIDE V-SHAPED DEPTH AND WIDTH _ TO CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN MULCH AND GRASS. INDIVIDUAL TREE,SHRUB. OR RAIN-GARDEN BEDS TO 6E SPADED I• (� - - I SIX TREES PER ACRE X SITE AREA(112 6) = 676 TREES REQUIRED EDGE,UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE _ 6 CALIPER INCH 974-_ - -T2 _ _ 968 _ 6-1 _ "CALIPER R/3 HEIGHT MINIMUM) ( ) 1 AL DISTURBED BE O L OTHERWISE N SOD TO B STANDARDINNESOTA GROWN - -- -- - is�= -� - 9� STREET ETREE REQUIREMENTS: 67 ES 7 AND HARDY BLUEGRASS MIX.FREE OFLAWN EWEEDS.UNALL$TOPSOIL AREAS NOTED BE RAKED 0 REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE - 264: �?_ _ sve Sea 1~ - TREES PER 100 LINEAL FEET STREET(31,329 LF) - 627 TREES REQUIRED DRAINAGE SLOPES OF 3.1 OR GREATER SHALL BE STAKED. SEED AS SPECIFIED AND PER MNDOT SPECIFICATIONS I - � S 1002-- --..—' 2 I (1-1/1*CALIPER MINIMlIM1 (940 CALIPER INCHES) 18 PROVIDE IRRIGATION TO ALL STREET TREE AND BUFFER LANDSCAPING ON SITE REAR YARD AND OPEN SPACE PLANTINGS WILL NOT BE¢ I DSCAPE TOTAL TREE REQUIREMENTS, - 1303 TREES REQUIRED CONTRACTOR IRRIGATED DE(SHOP DRAWINGS G$TO SYSTEM TLANDSCAPE O BE ARCHITEUIUD CT FOR DAPPR APPSCAPE ROVAL PRIOR CONTRACTOR INSTALLATION OF (1,616 CALIPER INCHES) IRRIGATION SYSTEM CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE OPERATION MANUALS.AS-BUILT PLANS. AND NORMAL PROGRAMMING I_ SYSTEM SHALL BE WINTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTUP DURING FIRST YEAR OF OPERATION. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE TOTAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDED: = 1228 TREES PROVIDED ONE-YEAR WARRANTY ON ALL PARTS AND LABOR. ALL INFORMATION ABOUT INSTALLATION AND SCHEDULING CAN BE �g I (INCIIDE ALPLANTINGS ON-5 1 (3,070 CALIPER INCHES) OBTAINED FROM THE GENERAL CONTRACTOR I 19. CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE NECESSARY WATERING OF PLANT MATERIALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS FULLY ESTABLISHED OR IRRIGATION SYSTEM IS OPERATIONAL OWNER WALL NOT PROVIDE WATER FOR CONTRACTOR Ifififirrr I :*NOTES: 20.REPAIR,REPLACE, OR PROVIDE SOD/SEED AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROADWAY BOULEVARD AREAS ADJACENT TO THE SITE • • STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON DISTURBED DURING CONSTRUCTION { i CONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS 21 REPAIR ALL DAMAGE TO PROPERTY FROM PLANTING OPERATIONS AT NO COST 70 OWNER. ——_———_ —— _———— I I NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 20121161PLP02 dwy 0' 100' 200' 300' rlRr_ 03/28/13 slr.e 23 OF 23 . W.dw9adfs•hd9rws.9loAlnc .. w. u y �PaT prepared for. Lennar Corporation Savona Preliminary Landscape d- MN�` ]699 Mapram Oelw AIIOSIRT mdr ih Yn d Ib SaY d]BwoLL 0!/�]n]Re•".ve Giv C•m,emta os/ra/+]R•w•ow Gty C��t• CEadNi PHONE 95TA]7.6 Plan FAY! 95f-03T-SeT3 DAPS rou FReE ILe&93].6150 Cory Meyu 16305 36th Avenue North Suite (]00 YYestllwod o• 06/14/13 t No 26971 �� `I'/ Plymouth,Minnnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo,Minnesota THE CITY OF I SAKE ELMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/20 I 3 REGULAR ITEM#: 10 AGENDA ITEM: Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30" Street—Accept Bids and Award Contract 1 SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin,City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator I REVIEWED BY: Adana Bell,City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Ryan Stempski, Assistant City Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.....................................................................................City Engineer - Report/I'resentation .....................................................................................City Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council 1 - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council Action on Motion ..................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider accepting contractor bids as presented and awarding a contract for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30°i Street. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-59,Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of$3,463,201.60,'for the Lake Elmo Avenue Server I►zfr�ar�tructure Improvements:1--94 to 30`h Street." STAFF REPORT: Bids were received, publicly opened, and read aloud on July 23, 2013. The city engineer has prepared and attached the Tabulation of Bids and a Letter of Recommendation for the award of the contract. The City received four (4) bids for this project, with Minger Construction, Inc. providing the lowest base bid in the amount of $3,463,201.60. The Engineer's post-design construction cost estimate for the project was $3.3 million, excluding a 10%contingency. The project remains within the budget amounts established with the project authorization. Minger Construction, Inc. is a known contractor having successfully completed similar projects in the Metro Area. The city engineer is therefore recommending that the Council award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Minger Construction, Inc., as outlined in the attached letter. Minger Construction is coordinating material lead times and is planning to put 2 to 3 crews on the project to meet the substantial completion date 1 of December 20, 2013. The Contractor has communicated a Balanced bid and is prepared to deliver the project per the plans and specifications. The City Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1.-94 to 30"' Street, on May 21, 2013, and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids. The Project was advertised on QuestCDN.com, Finance and Commerce, and in the Oakdale-Lake Elmo Review in accordance with the Minnesota Competitive Bidding requirements.The improvements include: I . The Village lift station located just north of 30th Street and east of Reid Park, consisting of a 12-foot diameter concrete wet well, two 1,200 gallon per minute submersible pumps, electrical/SCADA control panel, chemical feed odor control system, standby generator, and lift station site work. • Directional drilling {trenchless installation} of 16,250 feet of 16-inch forcemain along 30th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue to a location just south of Cimarron. • Open trench installation of 4,140 feet of 24-inch diameter trunk sewer pipe from the southern edge f of Cimarron to Hudson Boulevard. The project is the first phase of a multi-phase plan to bring municipal sewer service to the Village area by constructing a lift station,forcemain and trunk gravity sewer line.The improvements are necessary to convey wastewater from the Village area, along Lake Elmo Avenue to the MCES meter station located on Hudson Boulevard. Trunk gravity sewer pipe will be installed in the area south of 10th Street to make sewer service available to future development in the 194 east corridor area. The project need is documented in the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan and has been programmed in the 2013 Capital Improvement Program. The total "post-design"engineer's estimate of project cost is$4.5 million vs. a CiP project budget amount of I $4.9 million. FUNDING: The project will be partially funded from the $1.0 million DEED Sewer Grant. The state's obligation to fund ! f the DEED Grant shall terminate if the entire Grant has not been disbursed by December 31, 2014. The ! remaining project costs will be funded through the issuance of bonds with the debt retirement to be funded through the collection of Sewer Availability and Sewer Connection charges established by the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve Resolution No. 2013-59, thereby accepting the bids and awarding a Contract to Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of $3,463,201.60, for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30`" Street. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-59,Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to Minger Construction,Inc., in the amount of$3,463,201.60,for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer lgfrastructure Improvements.1--94 to 3e Street." ATTACHMENT(S): ! L Resolution No. 2013-59 2. Engineer's Letter of Recommendation and Tabulation of Bids 3. Project Schedule 4. Project Location Map E 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNT"XV STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-59 A IZ SOI.UTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDINf'1 A CONTRACT FOR THE III. LAKE ELMO AVENUE SEW E'R INFRASTRIlICT URE IMPROVEMENTS: 1-94 TO 30r11 STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the I.,ake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and bids were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, bids were tabulated, checked and summarized to verify that all requirements of the submittals were met; and WHEREAS, the project engineer reviewed the bids and has provided a letter recommending the award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of$3,463,201.60. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract in the accordance with the above ordered Project, in the amount of the Contractor's lowest responsible bid, and according to the plans and specifications thereof approved by the City Council. 2. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST,2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: - - ......... Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-59 1 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Sant Pout,MN 55101 651.292.4400 tkdo.com TKDA July 25, 2013 Mr. Ryan Stempski, P.E. City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Re: Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30"Street City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota City Project No.2013.123 TKDA Project No. 15204.001 Dear Mr, Stempski: A tabulation of the Bids received by the City for the above mentioned project on July 23, 2013 has been completed with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information. Contractor Base Bid Alternate No. 1 Alternate No, 2 Minger Construction, Inc. $3,463,201.60 ($15,000.00) ($0.00) Northwest Asphalt, Inc. $3,686,192.81 ($15,000.00) ($9,500.00) Northdale Construction Company, Inc. $3,755,466.94 ($0.00) ($7,000,00) Eureka Construction, Inc. $3,957,585.34 ($0.00) ($10,000.00) Engineer's Estimate $3,297,620.00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Minger Construction, Inc. for their Base Bid,excluding Alternate Nos. 1 and 2, of$3,463,201.60. Please do not hesitate to call me with any questions or comments you may have. Sincerely, Ronald S. Quanbeck, P.E. Project Engineer RSQ/etas Enclosure An employee owned company promoting affirmative action and equal opportunity g O G N O $Om1 O!�O i N O O pl fN'�<,Q a0 O M1 O rn`f D pppp O pp llllllpppppp O�p O m 00 OQ 1 O O O m ai yu�f N H Q.NV% Q n R H O T Q N r N 0 0 0 /1 r Q in V V,N O �r•t _ $n{.,m N C �N 1�T N N S= M N 33 g m m W ri ry Y1 Y, m ILLi m .+�T KI Vu�� o y1�ry w �mp Of 6} S O'� � N VI N••) Q N „r-N St R� N A M .+H 10[�n N IHY N .Oi�N.-1 T r•T(1 nT n F C m f'� 4 W y W W N VI y y W N W W W y VF y y W.W N W N W W y W W W W N W N W y W y Vi N--y W W W W W W W—y W W W N W d p p p(� Q p Y1 Q Q �>q• �y p y� 'r//�Q�� � J$m fJ O{N�•O O,N �.•�LI NY N O O C�H q$^!�ppS ��1D aq N hR IlM1�O!� m W CO o0 U m m 9.f ITV P N Q lQrf•�M IOr�INY^I rY h IY in V n a in N W W V}N y W y N y✓�N y W W N W W W N y N N N W W N N y y N N W N W W W 4i W W W N W N y y W W W N W W y y $po $ogomBS$ t'ih�1nn8p88t388pp888888$$ V O e'1 O N $od$a88$88pp88QQ''o•e}} a $pp$p8pnogqVjpo8p8opp$$pp88,$mm P,G IO/1 '.Oil W O Q �� S 1p COl VGi U,/O� 8 ? �{OV11 N N d ID VOI N tU p~1 N O OO 'Q S S b N O O 00 w O b M 6 N nl r� O n O'O t� O N O N!�• W NI rH Mq V�'?O m O P vOQf T O O q,Oep VV 'Q WMm.O�W W M .)Dw'•-N r{07 b v7 T ••) l0 ni oG T V)~�N V)rV•Q r!N.i ti O .m-1�1M1 O N n •{vl M T�N N N M V�'. W VF W W W N V•W N V)V!W y W W y Vi y-W W N N N W W-W Np—>Np W W W N N y W N W W W u)OpF W W W W V)W N V)W N W � O tlyy�1 pp p O NO 00 $$ $ $$8000$ OO OO$OOG O 8$8 $ 8$Sf0'>•$g08.�$EO,O g �occ vWooN.im:riNNBo onmpgnRopo v'^iaZiv`"imrn✓'q.a.,a."ruioutioa�Qp "1p800mmo8•r•" 25 qpj Of N ITV N� �+1 � Q,N V) O t�pO �O w V cl � ti N.�r�.•r H v+riin -1 A n a7• o V}H cl M O y16 O T t.l P .� Y T n M Om1 "r .y r^4• Y1 tU W W W ui N W N y VI N N W y N N N N N W.n vV W W N N N W W y N N W W N N y W W N W W y y UM V)W W N y y W W N y U.n0 ert) N N N W�N w y�V��.•VULF1 cZ 1�9 N C[OD L1 i0 O mpp�jj O O N il0f O O O W FI�➢U Yn0�"i W N 00 N H O.1 1�a0 M b YI M N.N•.m C b wI t•I C^H.1 R W•f WWNyNW WN Wyy Wyy'VF �hNWVYWW WNWK WNW WyU)WWV)y VYWy W1hWWNyy Wyv)y WNNW 8p8J88p§pp$$8$ oa$88$ B Q$Qpp8�$pr $$oo8�$ 8$$ppSonS $$p88}}o��$o8S88888p$pp88$Sp� C OO T N V rf ��W ry O fQ] in N T N vl T rV Vp)VFW W 1ppII y N y p y W pW Wp Wop W pp W h y W N N y p N p W N W W pW y W p y N�y>N W p N W W V4 W p W(W>>p W W N W y W W W W NQ W $ o8Q8$rv9� FSm88 ?gGge 9n9U88o� f o Y.wn� o.84$Pdmom888.PM!8Yo9$�'Sd c oumo.Iv n a"T N o000 W n .1Ro h.+w u{-i n M«L N mcio E ui vu Y>` a ry r vi ni wN n u <53 n o m M W m ."".'•+ a m m�N E W N N W W W W W W N W W W W--W W V1 W y—U------- Is � oo Goo c�ppo 0 000o g$$uc�c 888 $ $�!)• B$000088S$ $8 0 $ $no`c3,$$$$$8rr�j•voi, •L M1 t Up�p> N G D VI o0o 0 0 O N N Vi 1�O� N n f�� �C>O g�� M S a�W�tl YOI O H eN•)•-4•N-1'��N+1�`I O H N O S V� ��q N N O S p ti Q N 000 JP N O pp pp pp Yt ul III H T ✓1 T L.> 10 L W Vi W Vi V)+/i,yW11 W Ui W W y W W'/i N W N o y y IA W V)N W VF y yV�4 yN�N—N W N N1 N-y W N W W W y—W W N N N W y W W 2 .-, N<T H�,.1 Q♦+'N N g �b c�N .y W H w H vi c4•rt<•t C,M e��i^�N N G 1�m ID N��n N Q��N Q M H�N W W m z h'�'�` •��SQw`.�c�inV"+�'i1� u'5��.". '�J�';� � _+ui"�3=i".t���� .�.�1'�swig. w>?vai�"S1"3u.,�VL C ° R f w a c s v xa St`S �I¢ WSz z. g�iwaz Z2 i_o'cz a - o?i NA1, Q ccaa ZeQa <- c ¢a LI f�Yi in m W Z rHOi!] k I��G 6 ¢Q i lJ l) N >i~'^ , �i V ti V,N N rOi K W J w J V' 6✓¢I V ✓1 ' Y O Y1 2 C 4 y W N .1 zr Z d e ° G .e s 3 u o a z$ �° a FF ii ii W W O z o �u z ;z� �g�Q.r ia� ¢ ¢a�a u�ur_sz aaaa .yEudd �x �a K �¢� 0 z° N N fla uu ti ° iDz z >?`h�zl.�izya� nun :%; v: v� ✓ vl s es�•avc ua4'a]cs}��yJJ 2$ O N Q E�@.¢W�3 .O•i �n !- 0! Y�W �+,/1 US li Q X 0 8 w o .v ry m v N m r•m N ,, .. ,y •r ry m v'y vI w N w '1 .-I i`.`� .•I av n N n N N.v n N m T m .n m 1— gu'tl� w to � gFgR mwnhcm h �qoo ooa q.y n+c$Np�;ctWo•m o�i, 3¢, � a� P n 3�as CO 9•1 V N� m w�.{.n.y a F�N^i ry O YNI N V!-- -—-N N --------------- le x � N N y S�8U!Kl 18 /F v8t N CN Vs+n+n of Vf N N vI 0Vt NO VloF.hq N N N Vt N p QN V 368� $`3rvmg',5V'�m owom^�P'�wNonrti���Na`�4. �. c m N C.D a�✓i M N N W �{ O $iq c c qq n ° ✓i v QN n.J °��°.... v N a v ° o. vi .:4 Nj C V!Vt N N V!-- -»---N--V!N-Vi V!V)VF VI U} `d "�$$v� SoggB 'a'i•A88�ooggySo $$$ 85'•ooS � Yryuciao 3 'gN'�aw^m o�nm°� t`t8�u�i,n N,,vg�C�v$u°Di y n N m ta•1 N N M N � .O.1 N�ry eWi •y a p N ♦- N Vt m "t N N U!N N Vpt Vppt'VQQt N N VT VF VF Vt Ut vp!V!aa N VF N U4 UY V!N 6 N L N N N dw✓i O U O Vt c0 S ry M!•'i t m��G VO N iA A ti •C ry � V: Q.i.Yf a � N N N N N N V 1 V!H V 7 V!V!H N N i n N N N N V Y U!N✓+ M. 588o8$ vB� oSgrS88 p881 pS$p000pgS� p$ C p� Op. tpO n�G N fV pp�8 U 1N9 O O N b iV N O O o n p O� IV 6655 o Ci O• N.»N i!!fE ♦ W VI M O N W r n N h^h N 1O fff---111 W EN m ~V N N N N N N V t N N V f N N V!N V!N N w t N N N N U f N V)N V Y ✓aimN o ✓i✓i gNrv✓i S7.m...enM nnc � c t 1S S �a o M .gym c � w V!✓!Vt -N-ut -V!V•N N-Vt N VF N N N V!VY UI VY N O p 1N� {Qy a ✓f d a v a tµLL{ A s � o � m a a f N o.. X R C 2 7 n C z a a rcm A Li LL� a O ad¢ o u ate✓x t't< '3 j6 z S c o Q Na.'i c° �rv�O°� a�z¢aa $G✓ ?$N`amp� �" �s a.fOwa+ Pvaasi Pdeat�o d°u1 0� �iy.o1&5�d°ef�mGw�3Uk >vi m v 6a�SL F � a u�i aw z�nC'.O e4�'�� UO ?OOOI-nC w��7i✓a�i V m�0 o✓,L � �y`z � oarm 37 igf� i � � �� � v sc"a o o- 0 S F' 3��� g� �p mvo ..Nmv NNm•O N•arW won.rv,„`�a ri n 0 o S o 6 P O n 4,n P LJ 8 8 S TNe, O O g P O _ em nm u°��iwn n 8�Na�.+ a+ igm�vm c,� q�igwam�au�n�`��Y�m ma�n�N'in� �mm qry mm M O N YI 6� y 1p h A m ry M N N N N N ti .d. .Qi N 1�OD M�i M1 ti M h m w 6 N u i" r1 Q NNN NN HNNNNNN-VINViN NofNNNNYI—Vi-Y4NNNNNNNN NN NNNNNN NNNNNNNNN+/FN 3 "§'$»opa,Q�oa�g'j�i,�qo p0 0 off.�y4i�,�i,c�Si 8u o0o m eN.mq may:���aW<�o�M;•�i,��$ Stu, W R"t g Zv —N N N m N-N N—V F N N N N N-N C i a C r r C 4 iN m D{ r n o a � Y U w >i�a �ooaIIII u o 0 y7 p Y 4 ° � a "� t• a <r.� O �� .+�'i,���°Ki _ _ _ m mm� 3 LL $o ��°`e u4 Wna°aan"9 .Jul 3� °m c ui {p�-[ � :r.: yF. 11 Fa- Fzu fyf��3w� rno�n�m�+ 000C '^ V Q L a- � a _Y.-¢ ��� II y C G Y Y C 6� U I�d U F 2 ••• Z J 4 K J qF a aJ g _.�,� ��kQo:S..�"3L`¢zuQ �Q QoxQCtoaza Q _a �" t. �� H a z t 5 a E �"a[ E 7 xa Z z z w I.. �I,, hh h ym a z r s 3 o g r z z Qz Q `�$ N N "2 N Z Z ✓i N�ry N m¢ N VWV11�y nn S Q j LL h}ZL' N N N Y tl i q /U� �S_Z i Li ° u U m N N n`' Q r 2 G W U U t 3 D w W K K r� C K �" >. �.y }a. l? > Z Cl G e -61oj P8 hc° �w ,a000��°»� rcmNo�¢ ° c as " a c w° f zZ io Sui� B .aq z x �a FFFr w�s� %. t rt t` t.: cu k'A 4 v m 2 u w 7 Z V U l Q L7 1�9�Q Q Q V 22 CJ yUUy Z `L a t T T a V y d 4 W LL H C K O O V' N a n v v i'Ci. W 5 5 C ume y a w55 a a o>z i z u_S z �a mm_ `� c o g°v a 6 S ¢ Z~ h 2 F N 0pC F 2 N ((]] O H vQi 4. �m-I vi emit ry N N N N ry ry i0 iD T N 1^ tO ti IaV ��-I uxi �W W 1'-LS �Nn N m _�S 17 Cj 00 W Ol• n m Or m F 3 U u F o0 t=2 q�i,o O axr7 u�i.aa0 a�3a90 o as ass s o' m t�rv��m eoec`� rrmem 'oN�$`a'R-ipnp�r`�gnoNa�ip�.� a iI5 P O R N m m Q Q ey 0 n OD ry v�ry�W m M Q a0 .A Y F� ttCC1f� '1 M N tYt N N NN M1 N Vt NN N N N N N+/�NNNNNNtryNNN N N 000 $nab', a�aahn $a8aaaasaa8 .+n oa mug nti mo .n.rv�J m.Qvm�n ry ryw y NNN NMen an NhuINNN N NhNhh NN N N vl ~ M Iel Q Z � < ey�N .-s m n D.-�µ r b n �h✓t n ne n a Y O ~ hK o a � F- K Z O Q Q i• w 2 'j z Q z. V q Ur u Al2 O 4z °L 9ro8' OflO� t z p. OuO zPP DWG � " > 6'ot; 4w ` :- yes o � o Kaax� 3 ?� �E�n 'srzto co x -� FOCUS PROJECT SCHEDULE ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Geheren,P.E. 651.300,4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264 Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267 DATE: March 12, 2013 Chad isakson,P.E. 651.300.4283 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Project No. 2013.123 Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30th Street March 19, 2013 Council Workshop—Address Scope of Improvements/Project Schedule March 19, 2013 Council orders preparation of Plans and Specifications/approves Engineering Contract March 26, 2013 Project kick-off meeting [8 Weeks for Design] June 18, 2013 City Engineer presents Plans and Specifications for Council approval June 21, 2013 Placement of Ad for Bids July 23, 2013 Receive Contractor Bids August 6, 2013 City Council accepts bids and awards Contract September 9, 2013 Issue Notice to Proceed. Contractor begins Work December 20, 2013 Substantial Completion [includes all pipe installation, Lift Station start-up, paving] 15 Weeks [8-12 week pump & control panel lead time] June 1, 2014 Final Completion [includes restoration, and punch list items] •, rsLr6 Ynr�_ t ��kN a� 1 s :,_.. . '`�s� �.�'� SrN Proposed Lift Station ' N t� wtrf; n S Locatio j AVe N tt :1:1L Z u QUX ltt.N' sYi �� La Cc and, 5� 4 r: r cLGrg� °t''z ? LNGlftN. EG!'Jf. 7 �—wZ�G�T7(-TN Z NAN.44 Ping, MSIR r fy fForcemain Alignmen!11 A jr 2*5 27 VALLEY.Y Aj s rw ..7,Tw^7N 5� „aim . ihri e F3 >' %,.., a � F pppp t JLFP QT N A+ 34 35... �? K.6.. . 3 ,_ s+nPTri er Gravity Sewer A11 nt e e.ar{'F Op"DiA / �„ -.rtl,fbO7Z 6f .+ 7fAM Bl,kb e i. r t it..v of lE*Fwdbut'u MCEStifeter Station � ,. dam.. ,�,.,...,„..,......« Connection LADE ELMO AVENUE SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS:194 TO 30TH STREET LOCATION MAP t /A{'t'1 Sli L:.I'iY OF1���fy� CityIiaA Parcels IOL KE O h Publk Works Su1ldFng - Subdivislons W E Legend - City Parks Legend mFine m`&Eations R _ Golf Course S I HGehM Lake Elmo Regional . M Park Reserve �' •"= Proposed Forcemain � taep Dale:Jt"e 2013 i senoras asp",o,®>sa iProposed Gravity Sewer Lakes EN6I11E1RIN6,inc. THE- t HMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/201.3 REGULAR ITEM#: 11 AGENDA ITEM: Well No. 4 Connecting Watennain—Authorize the Preparation of a Feasibility Report SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin,City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Chad Isakson,Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item.....................................................................................City Engineer Report/Presentation......................................................................................Ci.ty Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates Public Input,if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested. to consider authorizing FOCUS Engineering to prepare a Feasibility Report for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain project in the estimated amount of$3,900. The report will satisfy Chapter 429 requirements to specially assess benefitting properties. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-60, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements. STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2013-2014 Capital Improvement Plan, watermain will need to be extended along 50s' Street and Lake Elmo Avenue, from 5& Street to 43d Street, to connect Well No. 4 to the City's existing distribution system. Individual home service stubs and fire hydrants will be installed as a part of the project as the trunk watermain is extended past existing residential properties.The improvements will benefit the property owners by providing them the opportunity to connect to the municipal water system and will provide increased fire protection for the property.The feasibility report is necessary to satisfy the state required process to assess the benefiting property owners if the City wishes to levy assessments as part of the project. 1 Similar to the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, this project is being installed as part of the overall water system capital improvement plan, and not as a project to specifically deliver municipal water to the adjacent properties.Therefore the adjacent properties are not required to pay 100% of the infrastructure extension costs as is seen in other utility extension projects, but the properties will receive benefit. The feasibility report and subsequent public hearings will be completed at the same time as the design of the watermain extension. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize FOCUS Engineering,Inc.to prepare the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Feasibility Report in. the estimated amount of $3,900. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve resolution No. 2013--60, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report ,for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements. ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No. 2013-60 2. Location Map 2 CITE' OF LAKE ELO ASI-IENGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLLiTION NO. 2013-60 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE WELL NO. 4 CONNECTING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENT'S WHEREAS, it is proposed to extend trunk watermain facilities along 50`h Street and Lake Elmo Avenue, from M4 Street to 43rd Street in order to connect Well No. 4 to the water distribution system;and WHEREAS, it is proposed to provide connection service stubs to properties located adjacent to the watermain improvements;and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to the City's Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 429. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, 1. FOCUS Engineering is instructed to complete a feasibility report in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the proposed improvements, and to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO C1IFY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAB'OF AUGUST,2013. CITE'OF LAKE EL,MO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-60 1 .. s TX_ f�IBi rt5 v �,,;4' � c6elt,� •� � r a rn t $ O ,r pp d E» la- Ma r> ® o fi C m. A v C uj CL 0 Jv sn ,�T1L n �"" ~ 1 THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 REGULAR ITEM#: 12 AGENDA ITEM: Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements—Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Approve Engineering Design and Construction Support Services Contract SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel,Finance Director Chad Isakson,Project Engineer i SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.....................................................................................City Engineer - Report/Presentation......................................................................................City Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input,if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing the preparation. of Plans and Specifications and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract for the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-61, Ordering,preparation of the Plaits and Specifications for the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements, and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract as recommended by the Cite Engineer. STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2013-2014 Capital I nprovement Plan, the City is pursing the addition of a.new water supply well, Well No. 4, to support the current and future growth and development water supply needs for the City. The project is being completed under three separate contracts to align with the various required contractor specialties; namely well driller; building, electrical, controls, and HVAC contractor; and utility contractor. Well. No. 4 is currently in construction with an estimated completion date of November 8,2013. All three contracts,together with the Keats Trunk Watermain Improvements,are part of the city's water system DEED grant, whereby the city must expend $1.0 million in local matching 1 funds to receive the$1.0 million state bond grant. Per the Grant Agreement, all grant funds must be.fully expended by December 31,2014. To continue the implementation of this project, staff is requesting authorization to begin the preparation of plans and specifications for the Well Pumhouse and the necessary watermain to connect the well to the existing distribution system. The connecting watermain includes roughly 3,500 feet extended along 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue to the intersection of Lake Elmo Avenue and 43`d Street. As identified above, the plans and specifications will be prepared as two separate contracts in order to retain two separate prime contractors to construct the work. To complete the engineering design, the City Engineer prepared and sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Engineering Support Services that includes a full topographic survey, the preparation of plans and specifications; plan printing, distribution and bidding services; construction administration support to the City Engineer, and construction staking. FOCUS Engineering will provide resident and council communication,conduct public meetings,project management,coordinate the project perniitting,and will provide construction administration services for the project. FOCUS will also oversee the project design and quality control review, and provide City design standards and documents to be incorporated with the project plans. Construction observation services will be retained at a later date once the project has been bid and awarded for construction. The RFP was sent to three firms from the City's Engineering Consultant Pool,including AE2S,Bolton& Menk, and SEH. The proposals will be received on August 2, 2013 and will be reviewed and ranked on the basis of: • Project Team Qualifications with a focus on a Project Manager capable of leading and delivering a multi-discipline building project; • Demonstrated understanding and experience with the project; and understanding of the critical success factors; • Understanding the scope of work and roles and responsibilities of the Consultant; • Collaboration skills and responsiveness demonstrated during the RFP submittal process; and. • Engineering Fee. The City Engineer will provide a recommendation at the council meeting to award the Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract based on the above criteria. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council authorize the preparation of Plans and Specifications and awarding a Professional Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract for the Pumphouse No.4 and Connecting Watennain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: ".Move to approve Resolution No. 20I3-6I, Ordering preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Waterinain Improvements., and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract as recommended by the City Engineer.'° ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No.2013-61 2 CITE' OF LADE ELMO WAS INGT'ON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLu'T10N NO. 2013-61 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PRLPARATION OF PUNS AND SPECIFICATIONS-, AND APPRO'%jNG ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE P JI PIIOUSE NO. 4 AND CONNECTING ATE MAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to the current 2013-2014 Capital Improvement Plan the City is constructing municipal water supply Well No.4;and WHEREAS, in order for proper operation and use of the well the City needs to design and construct a pumphouse with trunk connecting watermain; NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, 1. The City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall. oversee the preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the making of such improvement. 2. The City Engineer shall retain the services of a consulting engineering firm, to assist, where needed,to prepare Plans and Specifications for the making of such improvement and to assist the City Engineer during the construction phase of the improvement as requested. 3. The Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract is hereby approved as recommended by the City Engineer. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST,2013. CITY OF LADE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution.No. 2013-61 1 :...:......... .....:....... _.__ A KELMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 REGULAR ITEM#: 13 AGENDA ITEM: Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements—Authorize the Preparation of a Feasibility Report SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin., City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel,Finance Director Chad Isakson,Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER.OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item.....................................................................................City Engineer Report/Presentation................................................................................... ..City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council Discussion.................. ...................................................................Mayor&City Council Actionon.Motion...............................I....I...............................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing FOCUS Engineering to prepare a h y p y �. Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements in the estimated amount of $6,700. The report will satisfy Chapter 429 requirements to specially assess benefitting properties. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-62, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements." STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2014 Capital Improvement flan, trunk watermain wiII need to be extended along Inwood Avenue N., from 26t` Street N. to the approximate location of Well No. 3, to provide municipal water service to the developing properties in the 194 corridor. A water booster station has been identified as part of this improvement to increase water pressures in the southern part of the city due .to higher topography.These improvements are consistent with the 2030 Water System Comprehensive Plan. The proposed watermain route is shown on the attached location. map. As indicated on the map, alternative aliments may need to be considered for the watermain being installed south of 10", Street to correspond with the sequencing of the various potential development projects (Azar properties, 1 Montgomery properties, etc.).This includes the possibility that the final alignment may not be determined at the conclusion of this feasibility report, pending ongoing development alternatives. In. the end, however, the goal of this project is to provide water service to properties planning to develop south of loth Street and to develop the route and sequence of its construction in collaboration with various developments moving forward. A Preliminary Study was completed for this corridor to prepare high level cost estimates for extending municipal water service to the nearby neighborhood areas including Torre Pines, Parkview Estates, Cardinal Ridge and Cardinal View.From this evaluation it was determined that extending watermain into these neighborhoods could be better accomplished as independent projects with the exception of Parkview Estates. It is therefore recommended that the trunk watermain be routed.to include the Parkview Estates neighborhood as part of this project,to avoid redundant water system pipe and associated costs in the future. Individual home service stubs and fire hydrants will be installed as a part of the project as the trunk watermain is extended past residential properties. The improvements will benefit the property owners by providing them the opportunity to connect to the municipal water system and will provide increased fire protection for the property. The feasibility report is necessary to satisfy the state required process to assess the benefiting property owners if the City wishes to levy assessments as part of the project. Similar to the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, this project is being installed as part of the overall water system capital improvement plan, and not as a project to specifically deliver municipal water to the adjacent properties.Therefore the adjacent properties are not required to pay 100% of the infrastructure extension costs as is seen in other utility extension projects, but the properties will receive benefit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council authorizes FOCUS Engineering, Inc. to prepare the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements Feasibility Report in the estimated amount of $6,700. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-62, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain.Improvements." ATTACLAMENT(Sl: 1. Resolution No. 2013-62 2. Project Schedule 3. Location Map 2 CITY OF LADE ELMO ASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOI�L 'I SON NO. 20I3-62 SOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY PORT FOR THE IN),'OOD BOOSTER STATION AND TRUNK XNATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the 2014 water system capital improvement plan. identifies a new water booster station together with the extension of trunks watermain along Inwood Avenue North, from 26t" Street N.to the approximate site of Well No. 3,to provide municipal water service to the developing properties in the I94 corridor; acid WHEREAS, it is proposed to route this trunk watermain through the Parkview Estates neighborhood along Ivory Avenue N. and 1.5`h Street N. in order to more cost effectively construct the water distribution system; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to provide connection service stubs to properties located ac(jacent to the trunk watermain improvements;and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to the City's Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes,Chapter 429. NOW,THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED, L FOCUS Engineering is instructed to complete a feasibility report in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the proposed improvements, and. to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITE' COUNCIL ON THE `I]X -1 BAD'OF AUGUST,2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-62 1 ��/� | ��� ���W�{�H| � FOCUSENGINEE-RING, 'nC_ PROJECT� SCHEDULE � CaraG*heren P.E. 651.300.4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.380.4284 Ryan Stempski, P.E. 651.308.4267 Project Title: Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Chad |saksnn,P.E. 651.300.4283 VVaterrnain ExtenSipn —Feasibi|ity Report Client: City 0f Lake Elmo Project No.: 3013.Ixx Date: July I6, 2O13 August Ei3Ol3 Council orders preparation Vf8 Feasibility Report. August 8, 2Ol3 Team kickoff meeting. Schedule resident meeting and send out NOTICES. TBD, 2OI3 Resident meeting to present the project. September 3, 2023 Presentation of Feasibility Report to [Oundi Council passes resolution receiving report and calling for ahearing on improvements tobe held October 1, 2OI5. September 4, 2O13 Send notice of public hearing to residents and post innewspaper. October 1, 2U1g Public Improvement Hearing. Council passes resolution ordering Improvement and preparation of Plans. February 4, ZUI4 Approve Plans and Specifications and authorize advertisement for bids. March 6, 2014 Accept Contractor Bids March 18, 20I4 Award Contract. March Z1' 2Ql4 Process and send out Contract Documents. April 1l, 2014 Receipt of Contractor's Bonds / Legal Review, April I5, ZQl4 Conduct Pre-construction Meeting& Issue Notice tOProceed. September, 2014 Substantial completion. October, 2814 Final Completion Date. Record As-bui>ts; Testing Results; and Final Recommendation Letter to City Engineer. n I � P LU L m F�WFF ri s V/ A "2 N N lil y 41 }T C 2 E � d Y Co T. f0 aj U o c i ui 5 fA x � F If1 co � Y k v p. ;9 t iS t Yf mm 1"HE (111Y OF m�, LA K E El MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/6/2013 REGULAR ITEM#: 14 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Financing Plan of G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A;Approval of the issuance of G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A i SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director THROUGH: Paul Donna, Senior Vice President,Northland Securities ICI'�71ENVED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item............................................................................City Staff - Report/Presentation.................................City Staff,Northland Securities - Questions from Council to Staff...................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate........................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion....................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: At the July 2, 2013 City Council meeting, the approved the issuance and sale of C .O. Bonds to fund the 2013 CIP projects. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In order to fund various infrastructure projects in 2013 (Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, Production Well #4 and connecting Watermain, Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements and the Section 34 Water and Sewer Utility Extension), G.O. Bond funding will be necessary. The City of Lake Elmo retains the services of Northland Securities as Bond Counsel who has prepared a Financing Plan for consideration. The Finance Department has been working closely Northland to be sure the proposed Financing Plan complies with the City Debt Management Policy which was approved by Council in April 2013 STAFF REPORT: Paul Donna, Senior Vice President with Northland Securities will present the report and respond to inquiries. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council. approve Resolution 2013-63 authorizing the issuance and sale of$5,725.000 in General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A. "Move to Approve Resolution 2013-63 authorizing the issuance q f G.®. Bonds, Series 2013A in the amount of 55,725,000" ATTACHMENT'S: 1) Northland Securities Finance Plan Summary for G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A 2) Resolution 2013-63 3) Certification for Resolution 2013-63 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL, OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A ISSUER: City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota BODY: City Council KIND, DATE,TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING: A regular meeting held on Tuesday, August 6, 2013, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the City Offices MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Documents Attached: Extract of Minutes of said meeting. RESOLUTION 2013-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A 1, the undersigned,being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such recording officer on August 6a', 2013. City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO, STATE OF MINNESOTA HELD: Tuesday,August 6,2013 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular;meeting of the City Council of the Citv of Lake Elmo, State of Minnesota, was duly held on Tuesday, August 6, 2013 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2013-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS; SERIES 2013A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, State of Minnesota (herein,the"City"), as follows: 1. The City Council hereby finds and declares that it is necessary and expedient for the District to sell and issue its fully registered general obligation bonds in the total aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $5,725,000 (herein, the"Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used, together with any additional funds of the City which might be required, to provide funding for public infrastructure within the City and to fund the costs of issuing the Bonds. 2. The City Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation to Nortb and Securities, Inc. (herein, "NSI"). 3. The Finance Director and City Administrator are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $5,725,000 and to execute a bond purchase agreement for the purchase of the Bonds with NSI, provided the True Interest Cost("TIC")does not exceed 4.50%. 4. Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Finance Director and City Administrator, the City Council will take action at its next regularly scheduled meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 5. NSI is authorized to prepare and distribute an official statement related to the sale of the Bonds. 6. If the Finance Director and the City Administrator have not approved the sale of the bonds to NSI and executed the related bond purchase agreement by December 31, 2013 this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member ,and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. RY M - FOR CITY OF LADE ELMO, MINNESOTA $5f725fOOO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS/ SERIES 2A NORTHLAND { ' SEC URI IES 45 South 7",Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis,MN 55402 612-851-5900 800-851-2920 August 6,2013 Q. 555,72.SrOOU General 05, 11 tio s, Spin-fps 201IA FINANCING OVERVIEW This Finance Plan Summary describes the recommended terms and process for the public issuance of $5,725,000 of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A through a negotiated sale process. PURPOSE Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to fund a portion of the City's 2013 infrastructure projects including: • Keats Avenue street and watermai.n project • Well.#4&pump house#4 project • Lake Elmo Avenue sewer improvements • Lennar Area water&sewer improvements The estimated financing required for project costs is $5,600,000 allocated. to include $1.OM of water system costs, $3.OM of sewer system costs and $1.6M of special assessment costs. The total borrowing required including financing costs is$5,725,000 and is detailed below. Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 10f0112013 1 Delivered 10/01/2013 GO Improvement GO Water GO Sewer Issue (Assessment) Revenue Revenue SuLgmary Sources Of Funds Par Amount ofl3onds � $1,635,000.00 $I,025 000.00 $3,065,000.00 $5.725,000.00 Total Sources S1,635,000.00 S1,025,000.00 $3,065,000.00 S5,725,000.00 Uses Of Funds ;Total Costs_ofIssuance 34,379.99 2I,553.20 64.449.32 120,382.50 Deposit_ to Project Construction Fund 1,600,()00.00 I,000 a�o.00 3,000,000.00 5,600,000.00 jRundingAmount 620.02 3,446.80_ 550.68 4,617.50 Total Cases S1,635,000.00 $1,025,000.00 $3,065,000.00 S5,725,000.00 Page 2 NC31t`I"l:i.I_A.: L) w r11_CUItITIES STATUTORY AUTHORITY The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 475, 429 and 444. The City's bond attorney from Dorsey & Whitney is assuring compliance with Minnesota and Federal laws. DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE The total repayment generally reflects a level annual requirement over a term of fifteen years with an. assumed average interest rate of 2.92% and an all inclusive cost of 3.1.3%. Individual. repayment schedules for the improvement or assessment portion, water system portion and sewer system portion have been reviewed with City staff regarding projected.revenues to repay the debt service and compliance with the City's Debt Management Policies. The total estimated debt service is illustrated below. A complete illustration of the debt service schedules for each of the portions is included as Appendix A. Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Co„_�n Itrt T .,otal P+l + u erest 07/15/2014 220,004.00 0.300% 105,969.47 325,969.47 07/15/2015 305,000.00 0.550% 133,667.50 438,667.50 07/15/2016 310,000.00 0.800% 131,990.00 441,990,00 07/15/2017 310,000.00 1,100% 129,510.00 439,510.00 07/15/2018 320,000.00 1._.400% 126.100.00 44G,1(10.00 07/15/2019 320,000.00 1 650%s 121,620.00 441,620.00 07/15/2020 325,000.00 1.900% 116,340,00 441,340,00 07/15/2021 325,000.00 2.150% 110,165.00 435,165.00 07/15/2022 335,000.00 2,400% 103,177.50 438,177,50 07/15/2023 300,000.00 2.600% 95,137.50 _ 395,137.50 07/15/2024 315,000.00 2,750% 87,337.50 402,337.50 07/15/2025 315,000.00 2.900% 78,675.00 393,675.00 07/15/2026 320,000.00 3.050% 69,540.00 389,540.00 07/15/2027 325,000.00 3.200% 59,780.00 384,780,00 07/15/2028 325,000.00 3_350% 49,380.00 374,380.00 07/15/2029 200,000.00 3.500% 38,492.50 238,492.50 07/1.5/2030 205,000.00 3.600% 31,492.50 236,492.50 07/15/2031 205,000.00 3.700% 24,112.50 229,112.50 07/1.5/2032 220,000.00 3.575% 16,527.50 236,527.50 07/15/2033 225,_000.04 3.850% 8,662.50 233.662.50 Total S5,725,000.00 - 51,637,676 97 $7 362 67G 97 Page 3 NOR-1.11L NDgPSE`UR!'I'LES SECURITY &SOURCE OF REPAYMENT The Bonds will be a general obligation of the City of Lake Elmo. In addition, the City will pledge special assessments of approximately $1,635,000 (100% of the Improvement Project) to the repayment of the debt service on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds. The assessment revenue assumes first collection in 201.4 over a term of 15 years and an interest rate of 4.50%. We have assumed the water and sewer debt service portions of the bond issue will be supported 1001/6 from the respective enterprise funds and have therefore pledged those sources accordingly. An illustration of the projected debt service fund cash flow is below. Revenue vs D/S Less: Less: Equals: less: Annual Scheduled Water Sewer Improvement Assessment Cash Date P+l Revenues Portion Portion 105%Levy Revenues* Balance 07/15/2014 325,969,47 59,795.19 193,646.00 72,529.29 76,154.70 77,795.37 1,640.67 07/15/2015 438,667.50 74,972,50 223,935.00 139,760.00 14.6,748.00 1.55,589.73 8,841.73 07/15/2016 441,990.00 74,697.50 228,110,00 139,182.50 146,141+63 1.55,590.68 9,449.05 07/15/2017 439,510.00 74,297.50 226.870.00 138,342.50 145,259.63 1.55,589.85 1.0,330,23 07/15/2018 446.100.00 78,747.50 _230,165.00 J37,187.50 144,0046.88 155 590.34 11,543.47 07/15/201.9 441,620.00 77,977.50 -227,925.00 135,717.50 142,503.38 155,589.83 13,086.46 07/15/2020 44I,340.00 77,070.00 225,285.00 138,985.00 145,934.25 155,590.60 9,656.35 07/15/2021 435,165.00 76,025.00 222,245.00 136,895.00 143,739.75 155,590.56 11,850.81 07/15/2022 438,177.50 79,942.50 218,805.00 139,530.00 146,506.50 155,591.22 9,084.72 07/1.5/2023 395137.50 63 402.50 194,965,00 _136,770,00 1_43,608,50 155,589.64 11.981..14 07/15/2024 402,337.50 67,232.50 196,325.00 138,780.00 145,719.00 155,590.49 9,871.49 07/15/2025 393,675.00 65,857.50 192,337.50 135,480.00 142,254.00 155,590.84 1.3,336.84 07/15/2026 389,540.00 64,407.50 188,132.50 137,000.00 143,850.00 155,590.35 11,740.35 07/15/2027 384,780.00 62,882.50 188,710.00 133,187.50 139.846,88 155,590.20 15,743.33 07/15/2028 374.380.00 61,282.50 183,91.0.00 129:187.50 135_646.88 155,590.06 19,943.19 07/15/2029 238,492.50 59,607.50 1.78,885.00 �- 07/1512030 236,492.50 57,857.50 178,635.00 - - 07/15/2031 229,l 12.50 56,057.50 173,055.00 - 07/15/2032 236,527.50 59,207.50 177,320.00 - - 07/15/2033 233,662.50 57,117.5)0 Total $7,362,676.97 $1,348,337.69 $4,025,806.00 $1.,988,533.28 $2,087,959.95 $2,256,059.76 - x � MM Page 4 ' E)wrl-ILAND O'SSECURITIE RELATED CONSIDERATIONS • Bank Qualification - We understand the City (in combination with. any subordinate taxing jurisdictions or debt issued in the City's name by 501c3 corporations) anticipates issuing $10.OM or less in tax-exempt debt during this calendar year. Therefore the bonds will be designated.as "bank qualified" obligations pursuant to Federal Tax Law. • Arbitrage and Rebate - Because the City will. have issued more than $5.OM in tax- exempt bonds in calendar year 2013 the City will elect the Two Year Expenditure Exemption in order to exempt the Series 2013A proceeds from rebate. This.exemption from rebate does not eliminate the need to comply with other arbitrage regulations governing the investment of bond. proceeds and debt service funds. In particular, the City should become familiar with the requirements for maintaining a "bona. fide" debt service fund. These requirements will be explained in the bond transcript following closing. • Continuing Disclosure - Because this issue is greater than $1,000,000, and the City's outstanding debt exceeds $1.0.0M, it is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission's continuing disclosure requirements. Northland Securities is prepared to assist the City in this capacity. Page 5 SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED TERMS 1. Type of Bond Sale Public Offering-Negotiated Sale with Northland 2. Bond Pricing Wednesday,September 11, 2013. 3. Council Consideration Tuesday, September 17,2013 @ 7:00 P.M 4. Statutory Authority The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 475, 429 and 444. 5. Repayment Term The Bonds will mature annually each July 15, 2014 - 2033. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on July 15, 2014 and semiannually thereafter on each January 15 and July 15. 6. Security General Obligation of the City. In addition, the City will pledge special assessment revenues collected from benefitted properties to the Improvement Portion and water and sewer revenues to the respective Water and Sewer Portions of the Bonds. 7. Prepayment Option The Bonds maturing July 15, 2022 - 2033 will be subject to prepayment on July 15, 2021 at a price of par plus accrued interest. S. Tax Status Dorsey and Whitney, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota, 9. Credit Enhancement We believe a credit rating will be cost beneficial. The City's general obligation debt is currently rated Aa2 by Moody's Investors Service. Page 6 NORTHLAND SE C U R ITH S i S5,72.5,000.00 city of Lake Elmo,Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 I I Table ® Contents �.............. — i Report I1 ISSUE SUMMARY 'Total Issue Sources And Uses ...... .....—_._......._ ...— ... _.._.w Debt Service Schedule Revenue vs D/S ....... ................ ......................__................................. ......... ........ 4. i GO IMPROVEMENT j Debt Service Schedule ` GO WATER REVENUE Debt Service Schedt;l 6 GCS SEWER REVENUE Debt Service Schedule 7 I I I I I I ! i I t t GO 2013A Rev 4 f Issue Summary 7/26/2013 11:25 AM Noftland s $5J25,000.00 Cite of lake Elm Minnesota . --eso--- General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 j 1 l Total Issue Sources And Uses -- ........ _......----._.._ — 1 Dated 1,010112013 i Delivered 10/01/2013 GO Improvement GO Water GO Seaver Issue (Assessment) Revenue Revenue Summary Sources Of Funds j Par Amount of Bonds $1,635,000,00 $1,025:000.00 $3,065,000.00 $5,725,000A0..... ... ......... - - - -... Total Sources 51,635,000.00 $1,025,000.00 $3,065,000 E10 —$5,72S,OOU.00 ... ...... --_........ Uses Of Funds Total Costs of Issuance 34,379.98 21,553.20 64,449.32 120,382.50 ...... — - - .... ..... ...- Deposit to 1'ro�ect Construction Fund 1 600 000.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 5,600,000.00 Rounding Amount 620.02 3,446.80 550.68 4;fi17.5fl ..... ...... ..... _-...- —-- -.. __...-- ........................- - Total Uses $l 63 -._.....-..._....._........._..--.--._._.__..--+.....__5,(i00.00 $1,025,000.00-....—...-,_..__..---............._... b3,065,000.00 $5,725,000.00 I { i i I I ! i I i 1 i 1 1 I, i I i G0 2013A Rev 4 i 4ssue Summary l 71MY2013 j 1125 AM ® • S5,725,000.00 Cityof Lake Elmo Minnesota General Obligation Bonds,, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 1 jDebt Service Schedule Part, of 2 f Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l Fiscal Total � 10/01/2013 _ 07/15/2014 220,000.00 0.300% 105,969.47 325,969.47 01/15/2015 - - 66,833.75 66;833.75 02/01/2015 - - - - 392,803+22 07/15/2015 305,000.00 0,550% 66,833.75 371,833.75 - i01./15/2016 - - 65,995.00 65,995.00 - t 02J01/2016 - - - - 437,828.75 07/15/2016 310,000,00 0.800% 65;995.00 375,995.00 I` 01/15/2017 64,755.00 64,755.00 02/01/2017 - 440,750.00 07/15/2017 310,000.00 1.1,00% 64,755.00 374,755.00 01/15/2018 - 63,050.00 63,050.00 02/01/2018 - - - 437.805.00 I 1 07/15/2018 320,000,00 1.400% 63.050.00 383,050.00 ' 01/15/201.9 - - 60,810.00 60,81.0.00 02/01./2019 - - - 443,960.00 07/15/2019 320..000.00 1.650% 60,81.0.00 380,810.00 j 01/15/2020 - - 58,170.00 58,170.00 - 02/01/2020 - - - 438,980.00 07/15/2020 325,000.00 1.900% 58,170.00 383,1.70.00 - 01/15/2021 - - 55,082.50 55,082.50 - 02/01/2021 - - - 438,252.50 07/15/2021 325,000.00 2.150% 55,082.50 380,082.50 - 01/15/2022 - 51,588.75 51,588.75 - 02/01/2022 - - 431,671.25 07/15/2022 335,000.00 2.400% 51;588.75 386,588.75 - 01/15/2023 - 47,568.75 47,568.75 - 02/01/2023 - - - - 434,157.50 07/15/2023 300,000.00 2.600% 47,568.75 347,568.75 - 01/15/2024 43,668.75 43,668.75 - 02/01/2024 - - - 391,237.50 f 07/15/2024 315,000.00 2.750% 43,668.75 358,6%75 I 01/15/2025 - 39,337.50 39,337.50 - 02/01/2025 - _ _ 39$,U06.2S 07/15/2025 315.000.00 2.900% 39,337.50 354,33750 01/15/2026 - - 34,770.00 34,770.00 - 02/01/2026 - - 389,107.50 07/15/2026 320,000.00 3.050% 34,770.00 354,770.00 - 1 01./15/2027 29,890.00 29,890.00 - - - f 02/01/2027 384,660.00 07/15/2027 325,000.00 3.200% 29,890.00 354,890.00 - 01./15/2028 24,690.00 24,690.00 - 02/01/2028 379,580.00 i I GO 2013A Rev 4 1 Issue Summary 17r412013 1 11:25 AM i b 6 =e $5,725,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, ,dlilarlesota I _................-.._. General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 i 1 i Debt Service Seb ed le Part 2 of 2 i i Date Principal Coupon Interest _ Total P+I Fiscal Total 07/15/2028 325,000.00 3.350% 24,690.00 349,690.00 01/1512029 - - 19,24f>.25 19,246.25 - i 02/01/2029 - - - - 368,936.25 07/15/2029 200,000.00 3.500% 19 246.25 219,246.25 - 01/1.5/2030 - 15,746.25 15,746.25 - 02/01./2030 - - - 234,992,50 07/15/2030 205,000.00 3.60051° 15,746.25 220,746.25 01./15/2031 - - 12,056.25 12,056.25 - t 02101.12031 - - - 232,802.50 07/1.5/2031 205,000.00 3.700% 12,056,25 217,056.25 01/15/2032 - - 8,263.75 8,263.75 - 02/0112032 - - 225,320.00 { 07/15/2032 220,000.00 3.575% 8,263.75 228,263.75 - s E 01/15/2(133 4,331..25 4,331..25 - 02/01/2033 - - 232.595.00 li 07/15/2033 225,000.00 3.850% 4,331.25 229,331.25 1 02/01/2034 - - 229,331.25 f I Total $5,725,000.00 - 51,637,676.97 $7,362,676.97 - f! Date And Term Structure I i Dated 10/01/2013 i ................._.............................. DelivervDate ]0/01/2013 s __ ....................--- -.. r First Coupon Date 7/15/2014 - __. _. ..... ... First available call date 7/15/2020 __ _ ___. Call Price _ - — 00%.. ... _. .... 100. Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars — $56,086.39 Average Life 9.797 Years...... .... —._.—.�_. 1 ...... - _... ... Averag -+—+++-eCoupon..... _......._.......----.._... _.. ...... _...._. _..._2.9199187°/n Net Interest Cost(N1C) - 3.0475121% _..... —.............._............................................................... - ...... ..__...._._....-- —._..............__. True Interest Cost(T1C)..__.... ......- -.....- -................._. --........ --...3.020,W5%o _...__................................................. All Inclusive Cost.(AiC) 3.1255989% _.......---1....... .............................._- Form 8038 Net Interest Cost _—...................._.................. 2.91.99187% Weighted Average Maturity _ 9.797 Years .......... _..... .. _....— . i Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes --_. _....____ _-- —.. --__-- — 2.8686704%0 -...................---._........ --..... -- I I G 201"b.4 Rev 4 1 Issue Summary 1 7/26/2013 1 11:25 AM � Q 6 I $5,725-,0.._0._.0.00 Cit __. . -e Elmo. � ui- nesotaYLai ....... ........... General -- Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 � I i Revenue vs D/S Less: Less: Equals: Less: Annual Scheduled Water Sewer improvement Assessment i Date P+I Revenues Portion Portion 105%Levy Revenues" Cash Balance 07/15/2014 325,969.47 59,795.19 193,646.00 72,528.28 76,154.70 77,795.37 1,640.67 , 07l15/2015 438,667.50 74,972.50 223.935.00 139,760.00 146,748.00 155.589.73 8,841.73 07/15l2016 441,990.00 74,697.50 228,110.00 139,182.50 146,141-63 155,590.68 9,449.05 f i 07/15/2017 439,510-00 74,297.50 226,870,00 138,342.50 145,259.63 155,589.85 10,330 23 j 07/15/2018 446,100.0U 78,747.50 230,165,00 137,187.50 144,046.88 155,590.34 11,543,47 ......... ......... ._ —_...- _..._...... — — — 07/15/2019 441,620.00 77,977.50 227,925.00 135,717.a0 142,503.38 155,589,83 13,086.46 07/15/2020 441,340.00 77,070,00 225.285.00 138,985.00 145,93425 155,590,60 9,656.35 07/15/2021 435,165.00 76,025.00 222,245.00 136,895.00 143,739.75 155,590.56 11,850.81 07/15/2022 438,177.50 79,842.50 218,805.00 139,530.00 146,506,50 155,591.22 9,084,72 07/15/2023 395,137,50 63,402.50 194,965,00 136,770.00 143,608.50 155,589.64 11,981.14 j 07/15/2024 402,337.50 67,232.50 196,325.00 138,780,00 145,719.00 155,590.49 9,871.49 07/15/2025 393,675.00 65,857,50 192,337.50 135,480,00 142254.00 155,590.84 13,336.84 07/15/2026 389,540.00 (A,407.50 198,132,50 137,000.00 143,850.00 155,590.35 11,740.35 { 07/15/2027 384,780.00 62,892.50 198,710.00 133,187.50 139,846,88 155,590.20 15,743-33 07/15/2028 374,380.00— 61,282.50 183,910,00 129,187.50 135,646,88 155,590,06 19,943,19 - ......... ... .----....-..-- .. ....... —.......__-----........ 07/15/2029 238,492.50 59,607,50 178,885.00 07/15/2030 236,492.50 57,857.50 178,635.00 07/15/2031 229,112.50 56,057,50 173,055.00 - - ? 07/15/2032 236,527.50 59,207.50 177,320,00 - 07/15/2033 233,662.50 57,117.50 176,545;00 —......_.--..........................................................................................................._.... .. ... ..................................... ........................__ i E Total $7,362,676.97 $1,348,337.69 $4,025,806.00 a1,988,533.28 $2,087,959 95 $2,256,059.76 I 1 I 'Assumes 900%of project is assessed at a rate of 4.50% for a term of 95 years. i 1 I 1 I I I i I GO 2013A Rev 4 I Issue Summary i 7126M13 1 11:25 AM ® m ® 6 i $1,635,000 00 City of Lake Elmo,Minnesota Genera!Obligation Bonds Series 2013A i I! Improvement Portion 1 ' Debt Service Schedule - -- _....._.—_.._...._ ..................-------- ...... - _...__.............. .._............... � Data Principal Coupon Interest Total P+! Fiscal Total I 10/01/2013 - 07/15/2014 45,000.00 0.300%' 27,528.28 72,528.29 72.529.28 ' 01/15/2015 17,380.00 17,380.00 07/15/2015 105,000.00 0.550% 17,380.00 122,380,00 139,760.00 01/15/2016 - 17.091.25 I7 091..25 - 1 - - ...._..__............._...................._....................._._._.....__................................-- .......................... ..--......- 07/15/2016 105,000.00 0.800% 17,091.25 122,091.25 139,182,50 01/15/2017 16,671,25 16,671,25 07/15/2017 105,000.00 1.1000/. 16,671.25 121,671..25 138,342.50 01./15/2018 16,093.75 1.6,093.75 ....07/15/2U1$ 105,000.00 1.400%........................................... 16,093.75„- 121,093.75 137,187,50 -................_._. 01/15/2019 1.5,359,75 15,358.75 i 07/15/2019 105,()00.00 1.650% 15,358.75 120,358.75 135,717.50 01/15/2020 - - 14,492.50 14,4.92.50 - i 1 07/15/2020 110,000.00 1,900% 14,492.50 124,492.50 138,985.00 01115/2021 - - 13,447.50 13,447.50 i 07/15/2021 110,000.00 2.150% 13,447.50 123,4.47.50 1.36,895,00 01/15/2022 12,265.00 12,265.00 07/15/2022 115,000.00 2.4000/. 12,265.00 127,265.00 139,530.00 i ! 01/15/2U23 - 10,995.00 10,885.00 07/15/2023 115,000.00 2,600% 10,885.00 125,885.00 136,770.00 ............................................................---...............,............................................. --......................._......_...._............_..........— - ......._...............................__. -- ...............................,..........................0......... 01/IS/2024 - - 9.390.00 9,390.00 07/15/2024 120,000.00 2.750% 9,390.00 129,390.00 138,780.00 01/15/2025 - 7,740,00 7,740.00 - 07/15/2025 120,000.00 2.9000/. 7,740.00 127,740.00 1.35,480.00 O9/15/2026 - - 6,000.00 6,000.00 - j...........-............__....................................................................................................................._.....--............................................................_.....—........ -........_.........._........... .....................................-.._...._.................... 07/15/2026 125,000.00 3.050% 6,000,00 131,000.00 137,000.00 01/15/2027 4,093.75 4,093.75 07/15/2027 125,000.00 3.200% 4,093.75 129,093.75 133,187.50 01/15/2028 - - 2,093,75 2,093-75 - I 07/15/2028 125,000.00 3.350% 2;093.75 127,093.75 129,187.50 Total $1,635,000.00 _ $353„33.28 $1,988,533.28 - Date And Tenn Structure Da" I0101/2013 i llei: zr Date ]0/01/2fl13 ..... ..._._._..-----.. ..._.. - ... -- ....... ......--- __.-- _._._. First Caapon Date 7/15/2014 First available call date Call Price _ ...... ....... ... ........_ Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars _....-----.......... $13,644 83.--. ...._ _ ._...-.. ...._... Average Life 8.345 Years Average Coupon ............. 2,5909681% Net Interest Cost(N1C) 2.7407501 Trite Interest Cost{TTC) .. 2.7306632% ----- ! All Inclusive Cost(AIG) ---........ 2.84897UU% ..................................................................................... IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost ......... ....................................— - ......... ....._........................................2.5909681% t Weighted Average Maturity . ... ...... 5.345 Years Bond Yield for Arbitrage PLfl polies 2.8686704°/a........ - ---_..-..... G02013ARev4 I j u.eii—t I7126r 9 8 $1,025,000.00 City of Labe Elmo Minnesota .. .__._.__.>_ ._._ ........ __ ............._....... General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Water Revenue Portion i Debt Service Schedule - — - - _.. ... ......... __— ... i ®ate Principal Coupon interest Total P+i Fiscal Total 10/01/2013 - - - 07/15/2014 40,000.00 0.300% 19,795.19 59,795.19 59,795.19 01/15/2015 - - 12.486.25 12,486.25 I 07/15/2015 50,000.00 0,550% 12,486.25 62,486.25 74,972.50 01/15/2016 - - 12,348.75 12,348.75 J 07/15/2016 50,000.00 0.800% 12,348.75 62,348.75 74,697.50 01/15/2017 - - 12,148.75 12,148.75 - 07/1.5/2017 %000.00 1.100% 12,148.75 62,148.75 74,297.50 01/15/2018 - - 11,873.75 11,873.75 07/15/2018 55,000.00 1.400% 11,873.75 66,873.75 78.747.50 01/15/2019 - - 11,498.75 11,488.75 - J 07/15/2019 55,000.00 1.650% 11,488.75 66,488.75 77,97T50 01/15/2020 - - 11,035.00 11,035.00 - i 07/15/2020 55,000.00 1.900% 11.,035.00 66,035.00 77,070,00 01/15/2021 - - 10,512.50 10.512.50 - 07/15/2021 55,000.00 2.150% 1.0,532.50 65,512.50 76,025.00 I 41l15/2022 - 9,921.25 9,921.25 - 07/15/2022 60,000.00 2.400% 9,921.25 69,921.25 79,842.50 01/15/2023 - - 9,201..25 9,201.25 07/15/2023 45,000.00 2.600% 9,201.25 54,201.25 63,402.50 01/15/2024 - - 8,616.25 9.616.25 - 07/15/2024 50,000M 2.7506/o 9,616.25 58,61.6.25 67,232.50 01/15/2025 7,928.75 7,928.75 07/15/2025 50,000.00 2.900% 7,929.75 57,928.75 65,857.50 01/15/2026 7,203.75 7,203.75 j 07/15/2026 50,000.00 3.050% 7,203.75 57,203.75 64;407.50 Ol/15/2027 - - 6,441.25 6,441.25 I 07/15/2027 50,000.00 3.200% 6,441.25 56,441.25 62,882.50 i 01/15/2028 - - 5,(Al.25 5,641.25 - I 07/15/2028 50,000.00 3.350% 5,641.25 55,641.25 61,282,50 f 01/15/2029 - - 4,803,75 4,803.75 - 07/1.5/2029 50,000.00 3.500% 4,803.75 54,803.75 59,607.50 j 01/15/2030 - - 3,928.75 3,928.75 - I 07/15/2030 50,000.00 3.600% 3,928.75 53,928.75 57,857.50 01/15/2031 - - 3,028.75 3.028.75 07/15/2031 50,000.00 3.700% 3,028.75 53'028.75 56,057.50 0111.5/2032 - - 2,103.75 2,103.75 - 07/15/2032 55,000.00 3.800% 2,103.75 57,103.75 59,207.50 01/15/2033 - 1,058.75 1,058.75 07/15/2033 55,000.00 3.850% 1,058.75 56,058.75 57,117.50 j Total S1,025,000.011 $323,337.69 $1,348,337.69 i J J GO 2013A Rev 4 GO Waw Revenue 1 7/2612013 1 11:25.AM iSWWities. [now, S3,065,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, N innesoia � --- _ r. -- General Obligation BODdS, Series 2013A i Sewer Portion I ! j Debt Service Schedule _..._.. __- __.....- I Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+l Fiscal Total 10/01/2013 - - -®- 07/15/2014 135,000.00 0.300% 58,646.00 193,646.00 193,646.00 01/151201.5 - - 36,967.50 36,967.50 07/15/2015 150,000.00 0.550% 36,967.50 186;967.50 223,935.00 01/1.512016 - - 36,555.00 36,555.00 - 07/15/2016 155,000.00 0.800% 36,555.00 191,555.00 228,11.0.00 01/15/2017 - - 35,935.00 35,935.00 - 07/15/2017 155,000.00 1.100% 35,935.00 1.90,935.00 226.870.00 01/15/2018 - - 35,082.50 35,082.50 07/15/2018 160,000.00 1.400% 35,082.50 195,082.50 230,165.00 01/15/2019 - - 33,962.50 33,962.50 07/15/2019 160,000.00 1.650% 33,962.50 193,962,50 227,925.00 01/15/2020 - - 32,642.50 32,642.50 07/15/2020 160,000.00 1.900% 32,642.50 192,642.50 225,285.00 01/15/2021 - - 31,122.50 31.122.50 I 07/15/2021 160,000.00 2,150% 31,122.50 191,1.22.50 222,245.00 01/15/2022 - - 29,402.50 29,402.50 - 07/15/2022 160,000.00 2.400% 29,402.50 189,402.50 218,805.00 j 01/15/2023 - - 27,482.50 27,482.50 - I 07/15/2023 140,000.00 2,600% 27,482.50 167,482.50 194,965.00 01/15/2024 - - 25.662.50 25,662.50 07/1.5/2024 145,000.00 2.750% 25,662.50 170,662.50 196,325.00 } 01/1.5/2025 - - 23,668.75 23,668.75 07/15/2025 145,000.00 2.900"% 23,668.75 168,668.75 192,337.50 I 01/15/2026 - - 21.566.25 21.,566.25 f 07/15/2026 145,000.00 3.050% 21,566.25 166,566.25 1.88,132.50 01/15/2027 19,355.00 19,355.00 07/15/2027 150.000.00 3.200% 19,355.00 169„355.00 1.88,710,00 01/15/2028 - - 16,955.00 16,955.00 07/15/2028 150,000.00 3.350% 16,955.00 166,955.00 183,910.00 01/15/2029 - - 14.442.50 14,442.50 - 07/15/2029 150,000,00 3.500% 14,442.50 164,442.50 1.78,885.00 i 01/15/2030 - - 1.1.,81.7.50 11,817.50 - 07/15/2030 155,000.00 3.600% 11,817.50 166,817.50 178,635,00 01/15/2031 9,027.50 9,027.50 07/15/2031 155,000.00 3.700% 9,027.50 164,027.50 1.73,055.00 01.!1.5/2032 - 6;160.00 6,.160.00 i 07/15/2032 165,000.00 3.500% 6,160.00 171,160,00 177,320.00 01./15/2033 - - 3-272.50 3.272.50 - 07/15/2033 170,000.00 3.850% 3,272.50 173,272.50 176,545,00 I 'total 53,065,000.00 - $960,806.00 S4.025,806.00 - i r GO 2013A Rev 4 J G';Sewer Revenue 1 7/26/2013 1 11:25 AM Onha,nd 10000 7. ...... THF� C11"Y OF LAKE _ L MO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 REGULAR ITEM#: 15 AGENDA ITEM: Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension—Discussion and Consideration of Project Alternatives SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin,City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVJEV Ti D BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Chad Isakson,Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.....................................................................................City Engineer - Report/Presentation......................................................................................Ciity Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input,if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to review the options for moving forward.regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project, and provide direction to staff. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to direct staff to take to following actions regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Server Extension project. 1. Award the Contract to the lowest responsible bidder and absorb additional costs.pilded through the Sewer Enterprise Fund. 2. Rebid the project as an "add alternate"to the Section 34 Water and Sewer Project. 3. Reject all bids and wait to complete Phase I and Phase 2 together when the County resurfaces Olson.Lake Trail(in 2015 or 2016). 4. Rehear the project and consider raising the assessment amount levied against the benefitting property owners to cover the additional construction costs. BACKGROUND: The Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project was initiated by a petition for municipal sewer service from two properties located in the City of Oakdale. Upon receipt of the petition, Oakdale contacted the City of Lake Elmo to inquire interest by Lake Elmo properties to be served by the Oakdale sewer system and thereby share in the project costs. 1 Following several meetings with the Lake Elmo property owners and the City of Oakdale, the City of Lake Elmo authorized the preparation of a joint Feasibility Report to investigate feasibility and costs for the project. The Feasibility Report was presented and approved at the February 19,2013 council meeting, and amended to include one additional property on March 19,2013. The key recommendations outlined in.the Feasibility Report are as follows: • Design and construct an initial project in 2013 to respond to immediate sewer needs of the Oakdale properties and at least one Lake Elmo property. This project would extend sewer north approximately 580 feet and would be constructed in the boulevard of CSAH 13 without disturbing the roadway surface.The Project would serve 5 Lake Elmo properties and 2 Oakdale properties. • Coordinate Phase 2 sewer extension to 50`'Street N.to be constructed together with a future County Resurfacing Project (anticipated in the County CIP for 2014-201.6). Phase 2 would serve an additional 11 Lake Elmo properties and 7 Oakdale properties. • Treat TOTAL project as one for assessment purposes. All properties, in Oakdale and Lake Elmo, in Phase 1 and Phase 2, would be assessed equally in the amount of$18,500. Assessments would be levied over 15 years. • The unit assessment would be increased for inflation by $500 each year. • The Feasibility Report estimated project cost was $1.41,000 ($109,000 construction), with Lake Elmo's share of the project costs being$100,715 (5/7ths). • Lake Elmo intended to assess $92,500 ($18,500 unit assessment against 5 properties),the remaining amount to be carried by the city until after Phase 2 was completed. STAFF REPORT: BID RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Contractor bids were received on June 27 for the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project. Six bids were received ranging from $158,300 to $285,256. The Engineer's post-design construction cost estimate as competed by SEH,Inc. was$109,000. Staff has completed a thorough review of the bids and has determined that the main factor in this high bid was the small size of the project. Staff has also reviewed the project with the apparent low bid contractor and no additional savings is evident through a redesign. Therefore, one of the potential options that staff does not recommend is rebidding this Phase 1 project by itself. After factoring in all the project costs the project is running$54,700 over budget. Because the first phase includes 5 Lake Ehuo properties and 2 Oakdale properties, the Lake Elmo share of the overage would be (5/7 of the cost) $39,100 if the project was awarded to go forward. OPTIONS MOVING FORWARD: Because this is a joint project with the City of Oakdale, the options moving forward need to be mutually agreed to by both cities. Staff has continued conversations with Oakdale staff to identify and. vet through the pros and cons of various options. Staff will present the options outlined,below more thoroughly at the council meeting. 1. Award contractor bid to get the Phase 1 sewer installed as planned. Each city must absorb the additional costs from the sanitary sewer enterprise fund. Lake Elmo share would be $37,900 as described above. PRO: keeps the project moving forward and the residents happy who need sewer. Costs are known. CON: City sewer fund is not flush. Is the investment worth getting the project done? 2 2. Reject the bid and rebid the project together with the Section.34 Water and Sewer project(Lennar Utility project). This is a high risk/high reward alternative. PRO: Potential to receive lower bids by attaching the project to a much larger, more attractive project. Could move project ahead and save money (say up to $30,000). CON: Will cost additional. money to rebid (est. $4,000). Contract documents must be converted from City of Oakdale to City of Lake Elmo and project agreement must be redone to identify Lake Elmo as lead entity. There is no guarantee of getting better bids,may sink additional costs with no benefit. 3. Cancel the Project and wait to complete Phase 1 and Phase 2 together when the county reconstructs Olson Lake Trail. PRO. We rebid project as a larger one time project and can.rebid it during the off peak bid times. CON.The County continues to indicate that the road project will not occur until 2016. Lake Elmo residents continue to struggle with failing septic systems, with some potentially needing replacements. 4. Rehear the project (call new Assessment Hearing) with the intention of awarding the project but increasing the unit assessment amount so that no city costs are incurred due to the overage. Assessments would increase from $18,500 to $25,600 if spread across only the 5 properties for Phase 1. PRO: keeps the project moving forward and the residents happy who need sewer. Cost .increases are born by the benefiting properties. Assessment hearing gives property owners opportunity to weigh in. CON: Increased costs to property owners are steep. Rehearing the project is expensive and complex;Project is delayed to allow Report to be amended to reflect new costs, and assessment hearing to be held to levy new assessments. Unlikely to please all property owners. ADDRESSING AFFECTED RESIDENTS: Staff has already contacted the 5 affected properties to notify them of the delay in the project award. Three properties have expressed a willingness to wait, one has expressed a need to connect,and one has not called back.Properties in Phase 2 have not yet been notified. They are not expecting a project for several years. Once staff has developed a direction for the project, all property owners will be notified by letter and a resident meeting will be scheduled. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is respectfully requested to review the options for moving forward regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project, and provide direction to staff. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to direct staff to take to following actions regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project.- 1. Award the Contract to the lowest responsible bidder and ahsorb additional costs funded through the Sewer Enterprise Fund. 2. Rebid the prq}ect as an "add alternate"to the Section 34 Water and Sewer project. 3. Reject all bids and wait to complete phase 1 and Phase 2 together when file Counts, resurfaces Olson Lake Trail(in 2015 or 2016). .1. Rehear the project and consider raising the assessment amount levied against the benefitting proper(y owners to cover the additional construction costs. A.TTACHM NT(S}: 1. Project Location Map 3 7S k P« .4 w . f� Lam^ GEND pl2oPOSED GRAVITY SEWER MAIN 2oa 0 a z IN SERVICE STUB 100 Feet PROPOSED FOR, ITY SERVICE STUB a — —' PROPOSED GRA > PROPOSED GRINDER STATION(LOCATION TBD) ASSESSABLE PROPERTY FIGL7REN ARY 0.2 _X)tXX i No.2012.1? ��'®��SEDR�VETv1EN'TS SION SEWER I.1!'� >FO ; LAVE E EI Mo,WNNESOTA MINNSOTA OL,SON LAKE TRAIL SA ID REPORT ARY ER E?(I E • oAXDALE, X E I EERI MARCiL.2013 .:� FHE CITY of �� .....:.:...... r...y;,., AKEELMom!gyp MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/06/2013 CONSENT ITEM#: 16 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Consider Planning Commission Appointment SUBMITTED BY: Adam Bell,City Clerk THROUGH: Dean A.Zuleger,City Administrator REVIENN,T,I)BY: Beckie Gumatz,Program Assistant S. GGES"I'ED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - 1zltroduction of Item...................................................................................................Staff - Report/Presentation....................................................................................................Staff - Questions from Council to Staff............................................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input,if Appropriate...................................................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion..............................................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion......................................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion...................................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider making an appointment to the Planning Commission. The options before the Council are as follows: a) If the Council desires to approve the appointment,it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as I"Alternate oil the Lake Elmo Planning Commission, effective immediately." b) If the Council desires to deny the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to deny the appointment of Jill Lundgren of 8282 Glidden Bay Court North as P Alternate oil the Lake Elmo Planning Commission, effective immediately." c) If the Council desires to further deliberate the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to postpone making any appoinonent until a later Ch)7 Council Meeting" BACKGROUND INFORMATION: With the recent departures from the Planning Commission, including Mike Reeves appointment to the City Council, there are currently two positions open on that commission. It is recommended that the Council makes an appointment without too much delay so that the Planning Conunission can be fully staffed and operational. Applicant Jill Lundgren recently applied for Nicole Park's vacant Council seat. She was interviewed for that position but not selected for the Council appointment. All of the council applicants were encouraged to continue their pursuits of service to Lake Elmo. Staff received an application from Ms. Lundgren for the open Planning Commission seat and Council interviewed. Ms. Lundgren immediately prior to this meeting.The question of her appointment is not before the Council. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the City Council consider making an appointment to the Lake Elmo Planning Commission by choosing one of the following options. a) If the Council desires to approve the appointment,it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Jill Lundgren of 8.282 Hidden Bay Court North as 1"Alternate oil the Lake Elmo Planning Commission,effective immediately." b) If the Council desires to deny the appointment,it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to deny the appointment of Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as 1"Alterrtcate on the Lake Elmo Planning Commission, effective immediately." c) If the Council desires to further deliberate the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to postpone making any appointment until a later ON Council Meeting. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Planning Commission Application City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 651.777.5510 Fax 777.9615 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Date:'-f Name 1�I, AC4(1e--0 Address. ,�2) \--k- J1,i Phone Number W) H) CQ.S- k - > 1. What do you prisidez to be the major planning and developin t ues confronting the City of 1� % c 71j-ko Lake Ehno?-A &C\V\;'A"6L C-co 4, N-I<A X/ 2 X V r ylk& "Cr'. o4w 2. What you see a ;>s the role and function of the Planning Commission -Y'"-C-�k�4 Lk�, i-(N-, k;�)kk4-�k A-� ,. cA 7T experience and qualifications do you have that you feel will contribute to the Plan. g Cot rnission's-work and which will,enable You to provide a set in ��is regar "o-Z o 0 C 4. How much time do you have, or are you willing to devote to Planning Corxitnissio�ctivitrA?' C' 5. What property or development interest, either director indirect, do you have within Lake Elmo" Akr\ A, ` (91 Vvld�-11 2-1—c-A-l"D 0-el �A �A- Please complete and return to the City Office