HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 14 - CC Item 13 12 17 13 THE CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION
LAKE ELMO DATE: 12/09/13
AGENDA ITEM: 4A—PUBLIC HEARING
CASE#2013-29
ITEM: Boulder Ponds Planned Unit Development(PUD)—Concept Plan
SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner
REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director
Jack Griffin, City Engineer
Mike Bouthilet, Public Works Superintendent
Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief
Rick Chase, Building Official
Matt Moore, South Washington Watershed District
SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED:
The Planning Commission is being asked to hold a public hearing for a request from Amaris
Company LLC for a residential Planned Unit Development Concept Plan with 93 single family
residential homes and a 64-unit multifamily dwelling to be located on approximately 58 acres
immediately east of the Eagle Point Business Park and within the City's I-94 Corridor Planning Area.
Staff is recommending approval of the PUD Concept Plan with 11 conditions of approval as listed in
the Staff Report.
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant: Amaris Company, LLC, P.O. Box 10811, White Bear Lake, MN 55110
Property Owners: Louis Damiani Trust, c/o Security Bank&Trust Co., William C. Kuhlmann,
2202 1 Ph Street East, Glencoe,MN 55336
Tim Montgomery, 6211 Upper 5 Pt Street North, Oakdale,MN 55128
Location: Part of Section 34 in Lake Elmo,north of I-94 and Hudson Boulevard, south of
Stonegate residential subdivision, and east of Eagle Point Business Park. PINs:
34.029.21.33.0001; 34.029.21.32.0001; 34.029.21.33.0002.
Request: Application for Concept Plan approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD)
containing 93 single family homes and a 64-unit senior housing multi-family
residential building to be named Boulder Ponds of Lake Elmo.
Existing Land Use and Zoning: Agricultural land with one single family home (9120 Hudson
Blvd.N.). Current Zoning: RT—Rural Transitional Zoning
District; Proposed Zoning: LDR and MDR PUD
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Residential Estates subdivision(Stonegate)—RE zoning
and Park(Stonegate Park)—PF zoning;
West: Offices(Eagle Point Town Office Park)—BP zoning;
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
2
South: Retail Trade (Lampert Lumber)—C zoning and Sales
and Storage Lots (Cranky Ape)—C zoning; and
East: future proposed Lennar urban low density residential
subdivision(Savona)—current zoning: RT, future zoning: LDR.
Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential (2.5—4 units per acre), Urban
Medium Density Residential(4.5—7 units per acre), and
Commercial.
History: Applicants are participating in the Section 34 Utility Project under a Statute 429 area-
wide assessment. The utility project is expected to be completed in December of
2013.
Deadline for Action: Application Complete— 11/7/13
60 Day Deadline— 1/6/14
Extension Letter Mailed—No
120 Day Deadline—3/7/13
Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153 —Subdivision Regulations
Article 10—Urban Residential Districts (§154.450)
Article 16—Planned Unit Development(§154.800)
REQUEST DETAILS
The City of Lake Elmo has received an application from Amaris Company, LLC for a Planned Unit
Development(PUD) Concept Plan on approximately 58 acres of land located within the I-94
Corridor Planning Area. The Concept Plan includes 93 single family homes on the northern and
central portion of the site, as well as a proposed 64-unit senior housing multi-family residential
building. In addition, the Concept Plan includes vacant land along the Hudson Blvd that is planned
for future Commercial land uses per the City's Comprehensive Plan. It is the applicant's intention to
plat the Commercial areas as outlots until Commercial users are identified. The proposed PUD, to be
called Boulder Ponds of Lake Elmo, would be located on property currently owned by the Louis
Damiani Trust, currently managed by Security Bank&Trust Co., and Mr. Tim Montgomery.
The Concept Plan has been developed in response to the City's adopted Comprehensive Plan for the
1-94 Corridor, which guide the applicant's land as a mix of Urban Low Density Residential—LDR,
Urban Medium Density Residential—MDR and Commercial. The plan incorporates 93 single family
lots,most of which are designed with a width of approximately 65 feet. The majority(76) of the
single family lots are located north of the future minor collector road, 5th Street, whereas 17 single
family lots are located south of the minor collector. In addition,the 64-unit senior housing multi-
family building is also located south of the minor collector road adjacent to the areas that are guided
for future Commercial land uses.
As opposed to following the City's normal subdivision procedures,the applicants have determined
that a planned development approach offers the best method to achieve their development vision for
their property. The purpose of the City's PUD ordinance is to provide flexibility in development and
zoning standards for large parcels under unified control with the goal of achieving higher quality
development. More specifically,the General Concept Plan phase of the PUD procedure allows the
applicant to submit a general plan to the City demonstrating his or her basic intent of the
development, including general density ranges, location of residential and nonresidential land uses,
and location of streets,paths and open space. The purpose of approving the Concept Plan is to
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
3
provide the applicant with conceptual approval related to the requested flexibilities or variations from
the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances, or other City standards,before incurring substantial
costs related to submitting a full Preliminary Plat application. In terms of procedure,the planned
development path is similar to the normal subdivision process in that Preliminary and Final PUD
Plan approvals must follow parallel track to Preliminary and Final Plat. However, one critical
difference between the planned development process and standard subdivision process is that the
PUD Concept Plan phase requires a public hearing and the approval of the City Council.
Alternatively,the Sketch Plan review phase,the first step in the standard subdivision process, does
not require a public hearing and City approval. The reason that the PUD Concept Plan requires a
public hearing and City approval is due to the requested flexibility and variation from the City's
standard zoning and subdivision procedures. Regarding variation from the City's Zoning Ordinance
and Comprehensive Plan,the applicants have requested minor flexibility in a couple of areas, hence
justifying the planned development approach. The requested variances or flexibilities will be further
discussed and analyzed in the Planning and Zoning section of the Staff Report.
The Boulder Ponds Concept Plan also includes a significant portion of the proposed 5th Street minor
collector road as planned in the City's Transportation Plan. Once completed,the minor collector
road will serve as the primary access for the Boulder Ponds planned development. The segment of
the minor collector road included in the Concept Plan is part of the 1 st phase of the 5th Street collector
road, from Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13)to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19). Eventually,the 5th Street minor
collector road is planned to serve the entire 1-94 Corridor from west to east(Inwood Ave. to Manning
Ave.). As shown in the Concept Plan,the design of the minor collector road as part of the Boulder
Ponds development is consistent with the City's specifications for this roadway segment. The
applicant has provided for a 120-foot wide right-of-way,which will provide sufficient room for the
construction of a parkway with turning lanes, 10-foot bituminous trail, sidewalk,trees, lighting, and
other design elements as planned by the City. It should also be noted that the applicants and other
interested landowners in the area have recently met with City staff to discuss the possibility of
petitioning the City for a 429 area-wide assessment project to complete the 5th Street minor collector
road from Keats Ave. (CSAH 19)to the western boundary of the Boulder Pond project next year.
Finally,to achieve the desired vision of development for their project, as well as address difficult
grade issues on the site,the applicants are proposing to move the alignment of the minor collector
road to the south. The applicants are currently working with the adjacent property owners to the east,
US Homes Corp. (Lennar Homes) and DPS-Lake Elmo LLC (Dale Properties), to come to terms on
an agreed alignment of the 5th Street minor collector road. The proposed alignment of the minor
collector road will be further discussed in the Review and Analysis section of the Staff Report.
In terms of utilities,the applicants are currently participating in the Section 34 Utility Project,which
is extending sewer and water throughout Stage 1 of the 1-94 Corridor Planning Area. With the
improvements associated with the Section 34 project,the applicants will have access to both sewer
and water from the south(Hudson Blvd.) and west(Eagle Point Business Park). Currently, sewer and
water service are being provided by the City of Oakdale via a Joint Services Agreement. There is
currently enough capacity in the Oakdale system to provide sewer and water service to the Boulder
Ponds development. As the build-out of the Stage 1 Area of the 1-94 Corridor progresses, the City
will need to transition water services to the Lake Elmo municipal water system via the Inwood Ave
Trunk Watermain Extension Project, as well as transition sewer flows to the Met Council W.O.N.E
interceptor station along Hudson Blvd. The City will work with the applicants to plan for adequate
utility infrastructure with the submission of the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat.
Other major features of the proposed planned development include outlot areas that will provide for
open space, trails, and storm water management throughout the development area. The development
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
4
also incorporates a buffer/greenway area along the northern boundary of the plat adjacent to an
existing RE—Residential Estates subdivision as required in the City's Comprehensive Plan. All
outlots that are planned for park land or storm water use will be deeded to the City, while the future
home owner's association will retain ownership of the remaining outlots.
Regarding next steps,the applicant is proposing to bring forward a Preliminary Plan and Preliminary
Plat application upon approval of the Concept Plan. Per the PUD Ordinance,the final approval of the
proposed planned unit development will result in a zoning change to a specific PUD zoning district,
with specific requirements and standards that are specific to the development. If the application
moves forward,the change in the base zoning(LDR, MDR, C) of the property would occur at the
time of Preliminary Plan approval, and the final PUD zoning with approved flexibility that is specific
to the development would be established at Final Plan approval.
PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES
The Boulder Ponds site is guided for Urban Low Density Residential,Urban Medium Density
Residential and Commercial land uses in the City's Comprehensive Plan. The Density Analysis
sheet within the Boulder Ponds Concept Plan delineates the low density,medium density and
commercial areas respectively within the proposed planned development. The realignment of the 5th
Street minor collector road to the south allows the applicant to maximize the single family residential
area to the north, creating a larger distinct single family neighborhood as opposed to having the
parcels bisected in half by the collector road.
Regarding the design of the planned development,the single family residential area to the north of
the minor collector street is defined by one curvilinear residential through street that allows for ease
of travel through the neighborhood. The remaining portions of the single family neighborhood are
served by three cul-de-sacs,none exceeding 500 feet in length. Also, the applicants are proposing to
include several landscaped medians and islands within the proposed City streets, the highlights of
which are three medians in the middle of the single family neighborhood. In relation to the lots and
blocks,the arrangement follow a curvilinear pattern,which allows the vast majority of the lots to
back up to common open space of some form. The northern portion of the single family area north of
the minor collector street also contains the 100' greenbelt buffer between the new growth areas and
the Stonegate residential estates subdivision as guided by the City's Comprehensive Plan. The
greenbelt buffer contains a trail that connects to the trail provided by the Lennar urban low density
subdivision to the east and connects with the trail within the 5ch Street corridor to the west. This area
is also the location of a power line easement owned by Xcel Energy. On the southern half of the
minor collector road, a local street connects the medium density residential commercial areas from
5th Street to Hudson Boulevard. South of the collector road,the plan include one small area of 17
single family lots, as well as a 64-unit multi-family building intended for senior housing. Regarding
the commercial areas (approximately 9 acres)to the south of the medium density residential area, it is
the applicant's intention to plat these areas as outlots until prospective users are identified.
For pedestrian circulation and recreation, sidewalks and trails are planned throughout the Boulder
Ponds planned development. Consistent with City Design Standards,the applicants have included
sidewalks to be installed on at least one side of all streets. Also,the greenbelt buffer trail included on
the northern portion of the site is consistent with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan. In
addition to the internal trails and sidewalks that are proposed by the developer,the 5th Street Corridor
include a 10-foot bituminous trail on the north side of the road and a six-foot sidewalk on the south
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
5
side. The internal trails and sidewalks provide good circulation to the 5th Street trail, which is
intended to provide a regional transportation and recreation purpose.
Regarding the single family lots within the Boulder Ponds Concept Plan,the vast majority of the lots
meet the minimum size requirements for the City's Urban Low Density Residential—LDR zoning
district. The minimum lot size per the City's LDR zoning district is 8,000 square feet, and the
minimum lot width at building setback line is 60'. Of the 93 single family lots, all but five lots (Lot
59, 69, 72, 73 and 75)meet or exceed the minimum lot size of 8,000 square feet as required under
LDR zoning. Overall,the average single family lot size in the planned development is approximately
10,495 square feet. In addition,the vast majority of the single family lots meet or exceed the
minimum 60' lot width. The applicants have noted that allowing for minor flexibility in lot area and
width is one of the key reasons for proceeding with a planned development. Also pertaining to the
single family residential lots,the applicants are requesting that the City consider reduced side yard
and front yard setbacks to accommodate the unique design of the single family residential portion of
the planned development. Reduced setbacks allow for greater clustering,which promotes high levels
of open space. According to §154.802.E-F,planned developments may allow for reduced setbacks
and reductions in area and width of individual lots. It is Staff s understanding that the applicants are
seeking to allow 5' side yard setbacks on both sides of the principal structure. In addition,the
applicants may be seeking reduced front yard setbacks. Any reductions in front yard setback must be
approved with the understanding that adequate separation is provided between parking areas
(driveways) and sidewalks, so that any potential obstacles, such as parked vehicles or trailers, do not
encroach on residential sidewalks. Overall,reductions in all residential lot sizes and setbacks must be
clearly identified,reviewed and approved at time of PUD Preliminary Plan phase.
Also related to single family lots, the applicants have included five residential lots that are partially
or almost entirely on a small triangular piece of property owned by Dale Properties. The applicants
are proposing to acquire this land from Dale Properties in order to facilitate the platting of these five
additional lots and realign the minor collector road to the south. Dale Properties has submitted a
letter(Attachment#5) indicating that general agreement has been reached on the land acquisition.
For the purposes of the Concept Plan,the applicants have "ghost platted"the five lots, Lots 14-18 on
the PUD Lot Areas sheet,with the intention of acquiring the land prior to Preliminary Plat
submission. If these lots are to be included in the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat,the
applicants must submit evidence demonstrating control or consent of this area being included in the
plat. If this is not possible,plans must be revised accordingly.
Regarding the proposed multi-family residential building, the applicant has noted that it is likely
intended for a senior living facility. Given that the application is currently at Concept Plan phase, it
is not required that significant detail be provided. However, it should be noted that within the Urban
Medium Density Residential—MDR zoning district, multi-family dwellings are considered a
conditional use. At the time of Final Plat and PUD Final Plan approval for the phase that includes
the 64-unit multi-family dwelling, the applicant will be required to apply for a Conditional Use
Permit(CUP). Further review of the multi-family dwelling should occur at the time of review for the
required CUP.
On the topic of housing density,the applicants have submitted a density analysis worksheet to
present the gross densities associated with the low density and medium density areas. Due to the fact
that the minor collector road has been moved to the south, the proposed Boulder Ponds planned
development would include more single family residential development than is currently planned for
in the Comprehensive Plan. However, it is important to note that per the Comp Plan,the 5th Street
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
6
minor collector road serves as the boundary between low density and medium density areas in the
Stage 1 Area(Inwood Ave. to Keats Ave.) of the I-94 Corridor. The gross density of the single
family area to the north of the collector road,which is approximately 28.5 acres, is calculated to be
2.66 units per acre. The medium density area,which is approximately 10.1 acres, contains 81
residential units (17 single family, 64 multi-family), resulting in a gross density of 7.98 units per
acre. It should be noted that this density figure is slightly higher than what is guided by the
Comprehensive Plan. However, given that the proposed development is a PUD, and that the amount
of land guided for medium density residential development on these parcels by the Comprehensive
Plan is much greater, Staff has determined that the proposed Concept Plan meets the spirit and intent
of the Comprehensive Plan. To explain Staff s reasoning for this determination in another way, the
proposed Concept Plan decreases the amount of total land guided for medium density development
by over 20 acres by moving the collector road south. The slight increase in density above the allowed
range per the Comp Plan is balanced by the significant reduction in the amount of land guided
medium density. To put it in simple terms,by using the low end of gross density ranges in the Comp
Plan,these parcels were guided to have 195 total residential units (not accounting for road right-of-
way),whereas the proposed PUD Concept Plan includes 157 total units. Overall,the proposed PUD
Concept Plan is consistent with the intent of the land use and density requirements as guided by the
City's Comprehensive Plan.
In terms of parkland dedication requirements,the Subdivision Ordinance requires that 10% of the
land in urban residential districts to be dedicated for park purposes. Alternatively, fees may be
submitted to the City in lieu of land dedication at a rate equal to the market value of the land. It is at
the discretion of the City Council how parkland/fees are accepted to meet this requirement. The
Boulder Ponds site is approximately 58 acres in size. Therefore,under the approach of a pure land
dedication, the applicants would be required to dedicate approximately 5.8 acres of land for parkland
purposes. In the application narrative, the applicants note that within the proposed Plan Concept
Plan, 11.8 acres are devoted as park space. However, it must be noted that to be accepted as parkland
for dedication purposes, the land must be able to serve an active recreation purpose. In addition, if
linear land dedications are accepted, a trail that provides effective connectivity in the community
must be provided and constructed. Also, it should be noted that the City cannot accept land that is
subject to private easement for public parkland dedication. This consideration relates to the location
of the Xcel Energy power line easement in the greenbelt buffer area in the northern portion of the
site. It is the recommendation of Staff that further discussions be had with the applicants regarding
which areas are eligible for parkland dedication. Greater clarity regarding parkland dedication
requirements and eligibility should be reached in advance of Preliminary Plat.
Regarding available or future park facilities,the applicants are proposing to continue the
greenbelt/buffer trail along the northern portion of the property. This trail provides connections to
the 5th Street regional trail and Stonegate Park from the east. Given it proximity, it makes logical
sense that Stonegate Park, in addition to other City parks, will serve the future residents of the
Boulder Ponds planned development. It is recommended by Staff that the City works with the
applicants and property owners to the west of Stonegate Park,Azure Properties,to investigate
possible expansions or improvements to Stonegate Park. In addition Staff will work with the Park
Commission to evaluate if any additional facilities or programs should be offered at Stonegate Park.
Evaluating the facilities and programing of Stonegate Park should inform future planning or
expansion efforts.
REVIEW AND ANALYSIS
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
City Staff has reviewed the proposed Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan, which has gone through
multiple iterations in advance of the formal application being accepted as complete by the City.
During the course of these reviews, several of the issues and concerns that were previously raised by
Staff have been addressed by the applicant with updated submission documents. However, it is
important to note that there are other elements of the plan that still require additional attention in
advance of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat submittal. In general, the proposed plan
will meet all applicable City requirements for PUD Concept Plan approval, and any deficiencies or
additional work that is needed is noted for the purpose of inclusion in the review record. In addition
there are several things happening in and around the Boulder Ponds planned development that will
have an impact on the project, including the possible petition for a 429 area-wide assessment project
to construct the 5th Street minor collector road, as well as the final alignment of said road. Given that
some of these efforts are still underway, Staff recognizes that some minor modifications may be
necessary from PUD Concept Plan phase to PUD Preliminary Plan phase.
The City has received a detailed list of comments from the City Engineer, in addition to general
comments by the South Washington Watershed District, all of which are attached for consideration
by the Commission.
In addition to the general comments that have been provided in the preceding sections of this report,
Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider the issues and comments related to the
following discussion areas as well:
• Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Lake Elmo
Comprehensive Plan for this area and with the densities that were approved as part of this
plan. The gross densities for the development generally are consistent with the ranges
allowed for the urban low density and urban medium density land use categories. Other
aspects of the Comprehensive Plan relate to the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan as
follows:
o Transportation. The City's transportation plan calls for the construction of a minor
collector road that will connect the eastern and western portions of the 1-94 Corridor.
Staff views this road as a critical piece of the transportation infrastructure that is
needed to serve the densities that have been planned for this area. The applicant has
incorporated the right-of-way at the width necessary to construct the minor collector
as part of its PUD Concept Plan.
o Parks. The greenbelt trail provided on the northern portion of the site is consistent
with the City's Land Use Plan in the Comprehensive Plan. In addition,the City's
Park Plan in the Comprehensive Plan does not identify this area as a future location
of a neighborhood park due to its proximity to Stonegate Park.
o Water. Water will eventually be provided to this area via a future extension of the
municipal system along Inwood Avenue. The Boulder Ponds planned development
will be able to be served under the City's current agreement with the City of Oakdale
until the Inwood watermain extension is completed.
o Sanitary Sewer. The Boulder Ponds planned development will be required to
connect to the sewer main being constructed as part of the Section 34 area wide
assessment project. In this case, all of the property owners that are planned to be
served by sanitary sewer have petitioned the City to construct the required sewer and
water mains to serve the area.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
8
o Phasing. The Boulder Ponds planned development is located within the Stage 1
phasing area for the I-94 Corridor and therefore the proposed development is
consistent with the City's anticipated phasing of growth.
• Zoning. The proposed base zoning for the Boulder Ponds site will be split between the
Urban Low Density Residential—LDR, the Urban Medium Density Residential—MDR, and
Commercial—C zoning districts. However, approval of PUD Final Plan will result in a
zoning change to a specific PUD Zoning District, recording all of the permitted variations,
such as minimum lot size and setbacks, from the Zoning requirements of the base zoning
district.
• Subdivision Requirements. The City's Subdivision Ordinance includes a fairly lengthy list
of standards that must be met by all new subdivisions, and include requirements for blocks,
lots, easements, erosion and sediment control, drainage systems,monuments, sanitary sewer
and water facilities, streets, and other aspects of the plans. The City will work with the
applicant to ensure that all standards specified in the Subdivision Ordinance are met, or that
the appropriate variation is requested through the PUD Preliminary Plan.
• Concept Phasing. The applicants have also submitted a Concept Phasing Plan, indicating
how they intend to proceed with construction and build-out of the proposed planned
development. As proposed by the applicants,the Phasing Plan indicates that Phase I includes
construction of the access road to Hudson Blvd. and the southern portion of the northern
single family residential area. Phase II includes construction of the medium density
residential area. Finally, Phase III includes the construction of the remaining single family
area in the northern portion of the site, as well the 5tn Street minor collector road. Staff is
recommending that the Phasing Plan be revised so that all public infrastructure is constructed
adjacent to any areas being platted. More specifically,the minor collector road should be
constructed adjacent to any areas of residential homes that are being platted. It is critical that
the city ensures that all public improvements needed to serve development in the 1-94
Corridor are installed as growth occurs.
• Infrastructure. The developer will be required to construct all streets, sewer,water, storm
water ponds, and other infrastructure necessary to serve the development. Storm water
facilities should be platted as outlots and deeded to the city for maintenance purposes.
Adequate access to storm water facilities must be provided.
• Tree Preservation and Protection. Based upon the existing tree cover of the site, it is
possible that the applicant may not be required to complete a Tree Preservation Plan. If the
applicant can demonstrate that significant trees on the site will not be negatively impacted by
development activity,they would be allowed to submit a Woodland Evaluation Report in lieu
of a Tree Preservation Plan.
• Green Belt/Buffer. The Comprehensive Plan identifies an area north of the Boulder Ponds
planned development and south of the Stonegate subdivision as a green belt/buffer space with
a minimum width of 100 feet. In the case of the subject property,this area is also the location
for a significant power line easement held by Xcel Energy. As proposed in the PUD Concept
Plan,the applicant is utilizing this space for the continuation of trail corridor from the east.
Design of the greenbelt trail is consistent with City planning efforts to date. Staff believes
that that green belt/buffer requirements of the Comprehensive Plan have been met by the
applicant.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
9
• Streets and Transportation. The proposed street system has been designed to comply with
all applicable subdivision requirements and City engineering standards,with the exception of
the requested variance as noted in the City Engineer's report. Staff does have some concerns
related to the landscape medians and island in term of acceptable turning radii, emergency
vehicle access, snow removal, general maintenance, and safe turning movements. More
specifically,the central intersection of the northern single family area contains three large
medians/island that present difficult turning movements and safety concerns related to
limited turning radii,potential limited visibility due to plantings, and, in multiple instances,
direct driveway access that intersects with this unique central intersection. The applicant will
be directed to provide significant geometric detail of these areas and work with staff to
ensure that all islands and medians allows for safe travel movements and efficient
maintenance. Finally, further clarification must be provided regarding proposed plantings in
these medians/islands, as well as the responsible party for the maintenance of these plantings.
• 5t1i Street Alignment and Design. Staff has the following comments regarding the proposed
alignment of the 5th Street minor collector road and design:
o The applicants have proposed to relocate the alignment of the 5th Street minor
collector road to the south in order to maximize the potential for a single family
neighborhood to the north, as well as mitigate difficult grade issues that exist on the
site. From meeting with the applicants on multiple occasions regarding the proposed
alignment of the minor collector road, staff has found the existing grade challenges to
be accurate, and the alignment proposed in the Concept Plan to work in the context of
meeting Municipal State Aid(MSA)road design requirements. To make the
proposed alignment feasible,the applicants are working with the property owners to
the east, Lennar and Dale Properties, to negotiate realigning the road to the south. All
indications that the City has received indicate that general agreement has been
reached, and the realignment will move forward. Evidence of these negotiations is
documented in Attachment#5, a letter from Mr. Alan Dale of Dale Properties.
o In addition to the eastern alignment,the applicants have also been working with
Bremer Bank regarding the alignment of the minor collector road in the northwestern
portion of the site. As proposed,the 5th Street right-of-way would encroach on the
Bremer Bank property, and the road would encroach ever so slightly on the very
northeast corner of the Bremer property. It is the City's understanding that
discussion regarding the alignment of the collector in the northwest corner are
moving forward in a positive direction. As a condition of seeking PUD Preliminary
Plan and Preliminary Plat approval, Staff is recommending that both alignment areas,
the northwestern and eastern alignments, are resolved or agreed upon by all interested
parties in advance of future application submittals.
o Regarding the proposed alignment of the collector road, as well as the alignment of
the local access road connecting Hudson Blvd.,the properties to the south and east
(Cranky Ape and Lampert Lumber) of the subject property do not currently have
access provided. It is Staff s recommendation that right-of-way be platted to these
adjacent parcels in a location that is acceptable to the City Engineer.
o Finally, as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application
submission, Staff is requesting that the plans for 5th Street include all design elements
as requested by the City, including the street trees, landscaping, lighting,median
plantings, and other elements as proposed by the Damon Farber design work.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
10
• Sidewalks and Trails. As noted in the City Engineer's report, there are several instances
where sidewalks and trails are located within either private outlots or on individual
residential single family lots. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that all front property lines
include 10' drainage and utility easements. The placement of sidewalks within these
easements would impact the City's ability to use these easements for utility or maintenance
purposes. In addition,having the sidewalks located on private property hinders the City's
ability to maintain these public improvements. Also, it is important to maintain appropriate
clear zones for all sidewalks and trails. Staff is recommending that all sidewalks and trails be
located in City right-of-way.
• City Engineer Review. The City Engineer has provided the Planning Department with a
detailed comment letter dated November 20, 2013 as a summary of his PUD Concept Plan
review. Staff has incorporated the more significant issues identified by the Engineer as part
of the recommended conditions of approval, and has also included a general condition that all
issues identified by the City Engineer must be addressed by the applicant prior to approval of
a the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat. The Engineer does note that the proposed
Concept Plan complies with the City's standards, with one exception related to base material
of City streets.
• Watershed Districts. The project area lies within the South Washington Watershed District.
Comments have been provided(Attachment#4)by the SWWD Engineer, Matt Moore.
• Environmental Review. Based upon the proposed scope of the Concept Plan, the City does
not believe that the planned development will individually trigger further environmental
review.
Based on the above Staff Report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the Boulder Ponds
PUD Concept Plan with multiple conditions intended to address future considerations related to the
submission of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application. The recommended
conditions are as follows:
Recommended Conditions of Approval:
1) The applicant must obtain permission and consent from the adjoining property owner,
Bremer Bank,related to the right-of-way and alignment of the 5th Street minor collector road
in the northwest corner of the site. The final alignment must be determined prior to the
submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat applications.
2) The applicant must resolve the alignment of the 5th Street minor collector road in the
southeast portion of the site with adjoining property owners, specifically Lennar and Dale
Properties. The final alignment must be determined prior to the submittal of PUD Preliminary
Plan and Preliminary Plat applications.
3) Access must be provided to the adjacent parcels owned by Star River Holdings LLC (Cranky
Ape) and Lampert Yards Inc (Lampert Lumber)via either the 5th Street minor collector road
or the access road to Hudson Boulevard. The access location must meet the approval of the
City Engineer.
4) The applicant must acquire additional land in the eastern portion of the site to plat single
family residential Lots 14-18 as part of the Preliminary Plat application, or revise their plan
accordingly.
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
11
5) Request for flexibilities related to lot size,width, setbacks and all other requirements per the
City's Zoning Ordinance or Design Standards must be clarified and documented as part of
the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat submission.
6) The applicant must revise the Phasing Plan to accommodate the construction of all public
infrastructure adjacent to any proposed areas to be platted within said phase per the City
Engineer's report dated November 20, 2013.
7) All street and median geometrics must accommodate emergency vehicle access and
maintenance. Applicants must demonstrate acceptable turning radii for all uniquely shaped
landscape medians and cul-de-sacs.
8) All sidewalks must be located in dedicated public right-of-way. All trails must be located
within dedicated right-of-way, City parkland, or a 30-foot wide dedicated easement at a
minimum.
9) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland
Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed
district prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site.
10)Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the
developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision, and
the land is located outside of any restrictive easements.
11)The applicant shall observe all comments and recommendations from the City Engineer
documented on the Engineer's report dated November 20, 2013.
DRAFT FINDINGS
Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to
the proposed Boulder Ponds Concept Plan:
1) That the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive
Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area.
2) That the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan complies with the general intent of the City's
Urban Low Density Residential and Urban Medium Density Residential zoning districts.
3) That the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan complies with the City's Subdivision Ordinance.
4) That the Boulder Ponds PUD complies with the City's PUD Ordinance.
5) That the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the City's engineering
standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the
City dated November 20, 2013.
RECCOMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Boulder Ponds PUD
Concept Plan with the 11 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff Report. Suggested motion:
"Move to recommend approval of the Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan with the findings of fact
and conditions of approval as drafted in the Staff Report."
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
12
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Boulder Ponds PUD Concept Plan&Attached Materials
2. Location Map
3. City Engineer' Report
4. South Washington Watershed District Review Letter
5. 5th Street Alignment Letter, Dale Properties
ORDER OF BUSINESS:
- Introduction........................................................................................Planning Staff
- Report by Staff...................................................................................Planning Staff
- Questions from the Commission............................Chair&Commission Members
- Open the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair
- Close the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair
- Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair&Commission Members
- Action by the Commission.....................................Chair&Commission Members
PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM
® M A R 'I*lo
C O M IPA " Y
P.O. BOX 1 0695 I WHITE SEAR LAKE, MN 551 1❑
October 7, 2013
Kyle Klatt
City of Lake Elmo
Planning Director RECEIVED
3800 Laverne Avenue
Lake Elmo, MN 55042 OCT 1 2013
Nick Johnson
City Planner CITY OF LAKE ELMO
3800 Laverne Avenue
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Reference: Master Plan PUD
Boulder Ponds
Dear Kyle & Nick,
Please find the enclosed revised Master Plan PUD submission for Boulder Ponds. The
updated documents dated 10-04-2013 are enclosed and include:
1. Density Analysis
2. Color Master Plan PUD
3. Variances & Sections
4. PUD Lot Areas
5. Phasing Plan
if you have any question or need any further information to progress this application,
please call or email myself or Dean Robbins at 651-303-7208 and email
sonnyrobbins101ayahoo.com
Sincerely,
Raymond Pruban
Chief Manager
651-248-3631
rpruban@amariscompany.com
a 0
651 .426.0584 WWW.AMARISCOMPANY.CC]M 651 .426.0585
RECEIVED
A 101�
f
CITY OF LAKE ELMO
F= S
City of Lake Elmo —
DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM
o=rch—i•ie P1s Amendw— vat-,m '{SCC btiaW) [�liesidcvl.ttl SttbdivWox
PrchmivarvrTimrd Plat
❑ O 0 i-l0 Lets
❑TcZ A=rLament Line Acjus'mr_-m O 11 20 L0M
0 ;i Lots ar Mur;
Ll tlmd Pl--itt C E'.P. [l Residential SuWivWon ❑Fxcava=_"&Grading Pcrtnit
Coadmoaal Uss Pcnmis SltetchK o=cFn Yian -+ApPe-1 [�PUD
r'Condirional Usc Psi+(CU.P.) J Silc& Yl-Fcyiev t
APPLICANT: /}pi AQ1 S C,M P A.►i Y+ L l C JP, 0. a7t l Did I I W f T+ U(t(6-�-W SrI P
Msrx) (mbainp (7jp)
T&LE?YOON�: _. 4'-�l -Lfzt,-aStof 1-241Z 3V31 651 -42_b -aSgS_
(N�,raJ (rdorwj r►, iv}�aT�c��x (s aod i
ztt iv CA"4 LE
� < tF owNE �� S" 7 3
L t 1� S3 � �Gct�M•,nl
(camel (0.uhnp Adcrl*!t (Lpl 5�33'
Fe H My1T6aM46A)f (?I?- 7O1- 57-1 l�
TEL-EPHONES: WILLt� K...1`Ict,*A1) Z39-j- rf_2
(Htrrm¢;. (YMrk) (Mandel Wa4
PROPERTY LOCATION(Address and ComPletQ(Long)Legal Desarip}yon): a 12� ►i�" O-So r ��
DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: -_�_ILMSTIE7'� P 7W fjQ D ham_
'11AR1ANCE RtQUESTS: ,.s outtintZ in Sstinr '101.060 C of the L-ake lino Iwfw►icipai Code.Lhs, Thcm mtsst
danowtratt a hardship befom a varianx car be=mv:4• 11ne'sard3hip re?atfd to this apPE"6011 is as foiiows:
In signittf.this application,I kt by.•-mow(c5acc(hrt i hav:read and fully undrrstiand iix appli=hk.provisions of the
2cmitlg and SuSdivkim Ordix=*+=cs aad cirrcnt wirni i Lnolive pnxedttres. I furdmi aclmoadadua 6•1w cxnlanaeox ac-
'.the to
t^J11L' t'I Cr LYr t.b^"+•]F!U.'<�-.viiG A•YacL tics•Cali i3m ._rt:•;•i:•'•�7-!:10-yu 4�:-:'%-?SJS
3
That par. a•` the East Halt at the Northwest fouarter cj ;he 5o:rrh4+res. Quarter
and the West Hai` of the West Half zt the Southwest quarter of SeCzior 34,
TaKr�ship 2�, Rar,ye 21, ytasi�ir.ctor: �cunty, Minnesolu, I��r.c ror-h �' the north
Imo of WIINNESGT- 7E%MRTI�IEIJT~ OF -RAt6PORTATION RIA.Hf OF WAY PLAT
PUD Development Submission Requirements
PUD Planned Unit Development Stage
1 General Information
a The landowner's name and address and his/her interest in the subject property.
1/3rd Owner Tim Montgomery
6211 Upper 51st St N
Oakdale, MN 55128
Cell (612) 701-5616
ccnmont@vahoo.com
2/3rd Owner Louis Camani Trust
c/o Security Bank&Trust Co
Willam C Kuhlmann
Cell (952) 239-2297
bill @securitybanks-trust.com
2202 11th Street East
Glencoe, MN 55336
b The applicant's name and address if different from the landowner
Amaris Company, LLC
P O Box 10811
White Bear Lake, MN 55110
2593 Lake ave
White Bear Township, MN 55110
Raymond Pruban
rpruban@amariscompany.com
Office 651-426-0584
Office Fax 651-426-0585
Cell 651-248-3631
c The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the
development of the PUD plan being submitted, including but not limited to attorney,
land planner, engineering and surveyor
Rick Harrison
Site Planner
Rick Harrison Site Design
Office 763-595-0055
rharrison@performanceplanningsystem.com
Dean Robbins
Civil Engineer
Evolution Engineering
Cell 651-303-7208
sonnyrobbinsl01@vahoo.com
Paul Brandt
Soils Scientist&Wetlands Specialist
Soils Company
(651) 260-3783
Pibrandtl@vahoo.com
Jason Rud
land Surveyor
E.G. Rud and Sons Land Surveying
Work(651) 361-8200
jrud@egrud.com
Mitchel Cookas/John Hink
Hydrology&Storm Water Anatysis/Engineering
Solution Blue INc
Office (651)294-0038
jhink@solutionblue.com
mcookas@solutionblue.com
Charlie Devine
Real Estate Professional Advisor
Remax Specialsits
Cell 612-220-0140
devinec@icloud.com
2 Present Status
a The address and legal description of the property.
That part of the East Half of the Northwest Quarter of the Southwest Quarter
and the West Half of the West Half of the Southwest Quarter of Section 34.
Township 29. Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota. lying north of the north
line of MINNESOTA DEDARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION RIGHT OF WAY PLAT 82-43.
b The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands
within 350' of the subject property.
1)The existing zoning classification of the subject property is low density residential, medium density
residential and commerical. 2)The existing zoning classificaiton of the property to the northern boundary is
"Residential Estate". 3)The existing zoning classification of the property to the western boundary is
'Business Park". 4)The existing zoning classification of the property to the southern boundary is "N/A"
(Hudson Road with Intersate Hwy 94). 5)The existing zoning classification of the property to the east
boundary is low density, medium and commerical.
c A map depicting the existing development of the subject property and all land within See Survey
350' of the subject property and showing the location of existing streets, property
lines, easements, water mains, and storm and sanitary sewers,with invert elevations
on and within 100' of the subject property.
d Site conditions: Where deemed necessary by the City,graphic reproductions of the See Survey
existing site conditions at a scale of(1) inch equals one hundred (100)feet shall be
submitted and contain the following:
i Contours (min 5' intervals) See Survey
ii Location,type and extent of tree cover. Discuss
The site is primarily cleared.There are some trees on property lines that
have not yet been located by the survyor.
iii Slope analysis Discuss
In our understanding of steeps slopes,there are no steep slopes on the
site that would require a slope analysis.
iv Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands, streams and flood plains See Survey
within 300' of the subject property.
e A written statement generally describing the proposed PUD and showing its
relationship to the City Comprehensive Plan.
The Cities Comprehensive plan shows a mixture of Low density residential, medium
density residential and commercial.The initial comp plan shows a majority of the
property as being medium density housing demarcated by the 5th Street collector
road. Due to the grades of the site,the pipleine and the requirements of the MSA
collector road (5t Street), it became obvious from an engineering standpoint that 5th
Street needed to be moved to the south and west edges of the property.The PUD
Plan then integrates the low density single family lots (65'wide) into one
neighborhood north and east of 5th Street. The medium density area south of 5th
Street then integrates the (65'wide) lots with a senior housing development.The
PUD Plan is one that meets the intent of the ordiance for overall density,yet offers an
upscale feeling .
f Schematic drawing of the proposed development concept, including but not limited See PUD Plan
to the general location of major circulation elements, public and common open
space, residential and other land uses.
g Proposed design features related to proposed streets, showing right-of-way widths, See Sketches
typical cross-sections, and areas other than streets including but not limited to
pedestrian ways, utility easements and storm water facilities.
h Statement of the estimated total number of dwelling units proposed for the PUD and
a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres
and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include at least the following:
i Area devoted to residential use by building type.
Lot Type SQ FT Acres %
65' Single Family(N of 5th) 1,241,454 28.500 48.90%
65' Single Family(S of 5th) 311,048 7.141 12.25%
Senior Housing 130,960 3.006 5.16%
Commercial Propety 390,141 8.956 15.37%
ii Area devoted to common open space.
Description SQ FT Acres
Park Space 514,367 11.808 20.26%
Ponds Outside Commercial 66,993 1.538 2.64%
Wetlands 16,912 0.388 0.67%
5th Street ROW 178,873 4.106 7.05%
Internal ROW 187,844 4.312 7.40%
ROW South of Collector 124,453 2.857 4.90%
iii Area devoted to public open space and public amenities.
Description SQ FT Acres
Regional Ope/Park Space 402,737 9.246 15.86%
6'Wide Trails 22,292 0.512 Counted In Parks
5'Wide Meandering Walks 26,729 0.614 Counted In Parks
iv Approximate area devoted to, and number of, off-street parking and
loading spaces and related access.
Each dwelling unit offers a minimum of two car garges (and some three)
and a minimum of two cars to park outside in the driveways.The
residential streets are all 28' curb to curb allowing for on street parking
along the interior local roads.The commercial parking will provided as
part of the site plan submited when purchased and built by a commercial
developer. At tis time,the PUD Plan does not antcipate any variances with
regards to commercial parking requirements.
Lot Type Driveway Units Per Unit
Single Family Driveways 57,603 93 619.39
Senior Parking 26,329 64 411.39
v Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses.
The commerical area is being platted as outlots at this time.The total of
the outlots is 8.988 acres. When the outlots are eventually sold the
commercial developer will provide a site plan at that time for
consideration and appoval.
vi Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to industrial or office use.
None
i When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of time extending See Phasing Plan
beyond a single construction season, a preliminary schedule for the development of
such stages or units shall be submitted stating the approximate beginning and
completion date for each such stage and overall chronology of development to be
followed from stage to stage.
j The City may excuse an applicant from submitting any specific item of information or ??
document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration
of the specific proposal.
k The City may require the submission of any additional information or documentation ??
which it may find necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the proposed PUD.
O
k I m r m
� ro Tw � c � ti - .Ni • m N • n � i
fo g `c .. ,. ,. •� Q0
IL
e ` G
m N N N IP.. m • � N � Q Ql Cf
IIE
l � O� E k Y � � � r ° � •F-+
V\
CU
o
' __. _ s s>,.»• __e.. w�—_- .M�-. "It n• v - _-__ __-_ _ - �VV„ G_ �vr to
r .�•lam. ; t. M4 1 E r 2 fD � N c
4nCV
Al
jj jp j! 3
i'��', k � e^. ; .S T .I � �•, N n�.ma.S m .rwvr'm i � �a' :�� t 'X _ � � .w»a,� _ rA �
^,rife � �_"` ._.�-.• _�•.- �Jv�' � r � - I ip, � r� � e -
•.r
-
ae e. ; r.!!e•sa .sx ; ss 3 � m � � ,. r - V l�
aPe�M '• 8� �i V)e � \ i:.�� '\ ;�F. , IIII N i E a - v_ .T
tat�•o 'fY... f; }}
i M.x.n t°� ..t a •° �2;,„e �,s �/� � `s�\\`\� \ "�pr- -. - I f 1 Y v`• z' � s` d •Ne � � I _
/V'O
en
14
"•"'.OC .Y•s•T •'w ^' °o F J a /r r N
s" s
(( .(,vJ .. V '• 'y'ya..� ' 00 .` .` l ..+--_"- M,9Ei,r8 ^4
-/(!? a s �",. e '� -,ice �'. i „N M�i•� � Z
1
• � N f
j + i
T�i�
Density Analysis
o�
— •12n.txl
Ar&a Char)
__- - Eu.ye F4NV Orn.w.Ya
41,453.69 SQ •��.���� ��
i
ROW
2.007.85 SQ •, T"M Ara&:683.5n N'(15.sst8&cr&&I
8 Units i?er E1A
74L•YlM w,.tra1F ,,. >,,>.1<. q NI,.>..1
• � �+..r9 �..,<ullrin,e,qr�< t.. »,tl It• 10 qtl.a.r/
IdML
rarrrrr ,•rLr r..°.......ul u, ,..>u n w,o>�.«,
.� lawr.t n»<>.,lro In, >,,.tft o.L n• It St>L..rw,
L lr.l.,r.lY+.�Y... t>1.Jll.«a 1,• If LLItl Y.,..1
r 11W>.�/>rr.yaM
«,&ol
HUDSO.V BOULEVARD
of Lat6LUho,YAK
Total Number of lots 93
Average Lot Size 10,489 sq.ft.
Minimum lot Size 7,200 sq.ft.
Rick Harrison Site Design �entor
Sludto
U32 7-Aw North
Golden Va*V.MN S5422 Ir<M h ft(w wYloYrwble drsrgn
myv.<kt1Yn!ar!o.��
� _ Y
� • • ' � • • • • ' • 1
• IM • • . '
I s ' �� •�t;'?_,,, ,!.7b- il �'i ' w•� ^'�►' •„:ram , . • •
N 101ti St N icxh St I 10tn St N :• / • '• 1
J
fe
Ic.
:+
�M1.��- 'C•, may' • , 1 R "
3 s. ; �;s1 • ••/
,Oak Nlar;77 z t. •. - / 1 t_ _ _ �. I 1 I „�
Goff club r . — NA
sir- Ktamer Lvary
ake
z50 zs� - _ —=•
----`—- --- y,� _ 94 94
�!bYoodLury Lakny � +. a :+
Hudson Rd y
f ` g Oakbu�r�y` "17 I�_`J A ,� '^�t. I t' ,•'�
._ 1 c
j
i� "•�� � � •'� . ( 1 . Hudson Rd - s
�(ji
44
• • I `=Y""fy that this pion was Ktp,r*d by und.'nhy&ectsvp�;sfon �WIO-4"20'TE LIENT NAME SHEET
Amaris • • .Cny, LLC Title Sheet •
O
VARIANCES REQUESTS: LEGEND
- LOT SIZE VARIANCES w
PER EXHIBIT - PUD LOT AREAS BOUNDARY LINE y
SIDE YARD SETBACK 5' MIN. WITH 10' RIGHT-OF-WAY R/W
Cz
AVERAGE DUE TO LOT SHAPING AND COVING. BACK OF CURB �60'P.r uSA Slandardf tar U.bon Two-W Road•/GnHr Tum lmrt �'From Hudson to Sln SUsat
ll Others,
- 12" OF SELECT GRANULAR ONLY IN AREAS WHERE BITUMINOUS PATH 23-66' I lo' 76'Fran Hasson a 51h SL..1 VARIES O
CONCRETE WALK
IT IS NEEDED TO BRIDGE OVER UNSUITABLE MEDIAN (14*1°there' Cn
SUBGRADE FOR RESIDENTIAL STREETS. BUILDING PAD '—� �s o
SENIOR HOUSING
FUTURE LOTS — — — — — 25X 40% =� �= a
/ 6'TOPSOIL k SOD 6'TOPSOIL R SOD
5 - I 1111 1/2.1 _TJ
' SURMOUNTABLE CONCRETE
CURB&GLIT E CONCRFIE 1' CURB k GUTTER :S
� 7' CURB h GURFR O
I GATE C04ME FILTER AGGREGATE
EI (MN/DOCOARSET SPEC.3149
FILTER 2N) (NN/DGT SPED.3149 2H)
i��'•' '\ ^`� \�/ _j I� 6, 4'PVC PERFORATCD EDGE OR WRAF 6 a'PVC PERFORATED EDGE DRAIN WITH
HOLES AT 8 AND 4 O'CLOCK MOOT HOLES AT 8 AND 4 O'CLOCK I.NOOT
SPEC 3245. TYPE I CEOTEKTLE SPEC 3245. TYPE I GEOFMILE
�o I SOCK D N00T SPEC.PIPE. PLACED MOUND EDGE DRNN PIPE'
❑ •• \ I SOCK IAN00T SPEC.3733 PLACED
ARDUWO EDGE GRAIN PIPE.
' MIN'N Orr 2360
36 SEG110N: 1 S"- ,,PAVFMF0 TYPE
SP�
�'i` 5 +�) I 1WT Ou
AGGREGATE GATE SIZE TRAFFIC LEVEL.ASPHALT MADE B 15'-Nn00T 2J60 TYPE SP BIT.WEARING COURSE
MA%AGGREGATE SIZE A.TRAFFIC LEVEL 2,ASPHALT GRADE 8
❑ TACK COAT
TACK COAT
} T,FS - o I 2.0'-MrDOT 2360 TYPE SP 1Z.5 BR.NON-WEARING COURSE I.Y-1M00T 2360 TYPE BR.NON-WFARNIG COURSE
4A%AGGREGATE SIZE EL TRAFFIC LEVEL 2,ASPHALT GRADE B --AGGREGATE SIZE B.TRAMC LEVEL 2,ASPHALT GRADE B
% O I 8'AGGREGATE
BASE.CL S.t0D%CRUSHED STONE AGGREGATE(SPEC 3I38) 6'AGGREGATE BiSE,CL.5.100%CRVSKEO STONE AGGREGATE(SPEC 3138)
41 t2'SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(SPEC 3,49.20)
'f Ix"SELECT GRANULAR IKIRROW(SPEC]I49.x B)
❑+ 4
O ❑ O I SUBGRADE iE"1E0 AND APPROVED W ACCORDANCE WAIN CRY Sfµ TESTED ANO DARD SPECIFICATIONS
IN ACCORDANCE WTIH
R I CRY STANDNTD SPECIFICATIONS
o " L-.—• 1O1 TACK FACE OF GUTTER T'RK)R TO BOTH UF75 Of BITUMINOUS
O - I ACK FACE OF GUTTER PRIOR TO BOTH LIFTS OF
^ BRLALINOUS
,T ❑ 2. LOW
PVC PERFORATED EDGE DESIGN
N REQUIRED V ALL 2. 4'PVC PERFORATED EDGE ORNNES"PER IREDAPPROVAL
AT ALL
LOW POINTS.EDGE DRAM OESGN PER APPROVAL OF LOW ENGINEER
EDGE GRAIN OESKyt PER APRROJAL Of
I i CITY CNGINEER. CRY ENGINEER
❑ =
� TYPICAL STH STREET (MINOR COLLECTOR) SECTION TYPICAL LOCAL. RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION
O •O J (MINIMUM 9—TON DESIGN) (MINIMUM 7—TON DESIGN)
I O O
I o- � O ❑❑ i I
I O O ❑ o I
I ❑
I
I O o ❑❑❑ I
o Q W
I o O ❑- °� I
.O O
O O I O z
I on ❑ O _ Ll
O ❑ o
Z I
l ee ow -❑
R o O ❑
O I
o -
R O ❑ ❑
'I I
Io _
O . _ o
O o
:3t � ❑o o
I
—1
NOTE: �I '°° 2°°
2204 SCALE: 1' = 100•
] All single family lots are 65' at min. setback. 11K17 SCALE = z00'
Evolution ic
`'r DESIGNED DNR 1E0-DN GATE CLIENT NAME SHEET
I hereby certiry that this plan was prepared by me under my direct wperhs�an I ID-4-2D,3 e. - SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING and that I am a duly Licensed Prolessi..0 EngiIser under(he La.of In.Slate DRAWN' DMR 2.1T-7-2013 9 -
16790 2nd Street North of MmnefotP. i,- it'-
Lokelond Shores. FAN 55043 CHECKED:DMR 5,- 17.- Amaris Company, LLC Variances & Sections
Phone: 651-303-7208 5- 13.
E-mail: Bonn obbins101 hoo corn Name fteQ Number DAZE 7-26-13 7.- la-
2C13001-CON-VARIANCES-SECTIONS.dwg
0
Lot# Area(SF) Lot# Area(SF) Lot# Area(SF) Lot# Area(SF) Lot# Area(SF)
1 13,939 21 11,637 41 8,964 61 8,532 81 20,535 w
2 9,882 22 13,348 42 1Q649 62 9,199 82 16,322 w4
3 8,669 23 11,442 43 13,629 63 9,309 83 12,091 a
4 8,041 24 15,879 44 15,393 64 9,510 84 11,504
5 9,105 25 15,594 45 12,514 65 8,716 85 11,620 0
/J� 1 1 6 9,545 26 14,066 46 9,526 66 10,743 86 13,715 -d
" 20,22E SF �r
' 'f` 1 7 11,768 27 12,897 47 9,327 67 8,317 87 121406 }pr
27 26 ' �.' - 1B Q _' 8 13,393 28 11,735 48 9,190 68 8,105 88 10,569
12,897 SF 14,066 SF I it^4 O.p4,a A4\14 85'�F 13 S..F
D 2961 AC 0.3229 AClY).�D54 A 6,796 SF I 9 12,441 29 11,948 49 9,336 69 7,786 89 11,392
02019 AC
735 SF _ _I-,�� 10,0d9 SF V \ 10 9,804 30 11,576 SQ 9,636 70 8,142 90 9,426 '�
'i l J' 0.2307 AC
r-,
0.2694 AC
9,299192 SF
15,594 SF •�_. 0,2135 AC I 11 9,761 31 11,401 51 8,346 71 10,298 91 16,176
0.3580 AC 20
11,065 SF / .- 11 12 9,299 32 10,108 52 8,334 72 7,341 92 8,145
29
02540 AC / 9.761 Sr
11,948 SF 12,441 SF
0.274.3i9 2A AC 15.879 SF / 9 ,D 0.2241 AC 13 8,796 33 9,702 53 8,399 73 7,206 93 10,526
- 21 B 0.2856 AC
I 0.3645 AC 11,537 SF 13.393 SF 9.804 SIF p ��t
30 \- 0.2671 AC 03075 AC 0.2251 AC 14 20,228 34 8,064 54 $251 74 8,024
11.t2556 SAC 02827 SF 13,348 SF 1 �-.-,, 15 11,657 35 8,839 55 8,173 75 7,764
1 0.3064 AC 7
1 3, 11,768 SF 16 8,859 36 10,171 56 8,280 76 9,123
I 11,401 SF 0,2701 AC
1 0 2517 AC 17 10 532 37 9 960 57 l 55 � 8,225 77 14,020
32 8.173 SF 6
' , 08 6F 9,545 SF 18 11,248 38 9,552 58 10,046 78 10,290
23
I 0.2321 AC � 54 0.1 B7fi AC 56 0.2191 AC
I 33 8.251 SF 8,280 SF i
I 0.1694 AC 0.1901 AC 5 1 19 10,049 39 10,732 59 7,959 79 11,383
13.939 SF
9,702
2227 AC 53 8225 SF 0.2 90 A 9,lCr5 SF 8,669 5F 0.3200 AC I 20 11065 40 9,720 60 $480 80 14,267
I 8,399 SF O',BOB AC .1990 A 4,P ! ! !
0.1928 AC 4
5B t� 1841 SF ry,1,o, NOTE: Lots 14-18 are to be plotted at time of additional parcel acquisition. 1
8.064 SF 52 0.1846 AC
,],,..11 8.334 SF 10.046 SF
0.2306 AC
3 AC
35 �-�
\ _8,_839 SF 51 _ _ 59
02029 AC 8,346 5F 7,939 SF 71 ` 74
1 0.1916 AC 0.1827 AC t0,Z98 SF�`�+ P
36 50 0.2364 AC 460y ^�P401842 AC
t0.f 71 SF 9,636 SF 60 0 4 75
0.2335 AC 0.22tZ AC 8.480 SF 1Y ,764 SF taf
49 0.1947 AC 70 0.1782 A37 C
Elf
1 9,960 SF 9.391
36 SF 81 6,142 SF 9.123 SF 16.176 SF 03
0.2143 AC O.ta69 AC 77
0.2287 AC 8,532 SF 0.294 AC 0.3713 AC
01959 AC 0.3210 SF
38 48 7,786 SF 03218 AC `oF
9,552 SF 9.190 SF 62
_ 0,2193 AC 0-2110 AO 9,199 SF 0.1787 AC 13 9 0 PC 93 ,O
1 0.2112 AC 68 10,290 SF 96 1.2416 SF x
I 39 47 8,105 SF M2362 AC .216 SF 0.2416 AC
I 10,732 SF 9.327 SF 63 0 1861 AC I 0.2164 AC
0.2464 AC D.2141 AC 9.309 SF II,J83 SF 89
1 0.2137 AC \ 0,317 SF 0.2613 AC 11.392 5F
40
I SF I/ 46 ,510 \ , .2615 AC
9,720 9,526 SF 1432657 AF
0.2E31 AC 98SF 27 88
0, AC 107 �J
_
10,569 5F
I 41 0.2466 AC / 0.2426 AC
1 8.964 SF 12,514 SF 65
1 0.2058 AC 2D,535 SF
0.2873 AC 8,716 SF 87
0.2001 AC 0.4714 qC 12,406 SF
42 I 0
10,549 SF .2848 AC
0.2415 AC 44 15.393 SF 82
4J 16 22 SF
0.3534 AC ,3 -�
13,fi29 SF / 0.3747 AC I 86 l
0.3129 aC // 1 SF
1 / 83 0.3148 3I48 AC O I
12,091 SF!� 84
a 1 0.2776 C H5 1,J
11 1
11,50 1.620 SF
SF 0.2668 AC
0 Z641 AC I -
NOTE: 100 0 200
All single family lots are 65' at min. setback. 22x34 SCALE: 1" = 100
1tx17 SCALE: 1' = 200'
Evolution l-h ie att- OE9aNm MR 1.V0-4-DATE CLIENT NAME SHEET
hertha tenily Nal this plan was prepared n near under a ..1 he Stlslan 1.,0-d-2013 9 - SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING d that 1 am a duly Ucemed Proleeaiand Engineer under the Law of the Stota �,A,hT1, a,R 2.11-7-2013 9 -
16790 2nd Street North of M:nneaota. 3.- ,0.-
Lakeland Shares, MN 55043 CHECKED:0MR 4.-_ ,1.-_ Amaris Company, LLC PUD Lot Areas
Phone: 651-303-7208 5. 12.
E-mail: son0 obb VsO101 hoo.com Hame Reg Runner DAZE: 7-26-13 j:_ 14'- 3 10
2013001-CON-LOT-AREAS-dw9
LEGEND 0
PHASE BOUNDARY
PHASE I
E .1 PHASE 11
E: ]PHASE III
Ft
es
PLO
Y.
EF
0
PSI
is
W:
Uis
'U
qL — — —— — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —iti
is
k-
1 .
(Zi
.tip ti
is
rf
2t
PV
trt
a0
100 0 200
22jt34 SCALE: I" - 100'
1107 SCALE: 1*= 200'
DESIGNED-OUR REMION WE
Evolution c,.,-r.,,,y,t,Wy that this plan p,.p—d by o,under my oi—t-p-41. 1 10-4-2013 CLIENT NAME SHEET
ill-7-20f3 SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING and that t a duly Uce-0 Ptof,stu-1 Egn,w under 0.Le,,,of the Stall,
1679 2nd St,eel,North 3
0 4�- it Concept Phasing
Lakeland Shores, MN 55043 OMR Ainaris Company, LLC I
S.- :2 - 4 OF I
Ep� - - - 3:-
o�nqeil:6s5ci�n3yroo3�bi7i,2soloOlOyoh.o.com No.. Rog Number 14-
- 2013(101-CON-PHASING d.9
-- '_-' �� �\ 1 1 1 I .� � �'�' I I 1 -III r � � -•+
r I
-
\ .! + \ I I.- t 1 \ L- r
\\\ 1 I // r'/ i// / / 7{ a I1 1\ _ li i i \ �`� 1 rr \\. ' ».. - -'.wa 1I / �\ • t CCS
,�� � ��y , , / - •� I 1 I��-\ ``.\
'mot l00• 0 0411
C+-4
L.
II �\ 1 I\ s ' ! ,-- II `1`I a� \ 1 /\\ \/ ' 1 I }T \�\\ • jlf�Pt \I .a SCALE: t" `tQR' 1 U)
l�-`� 1 \ t � ` \ II // I• 1 -'? a r 1ti.� /, 1 / s �\ 1' \ i 11.17 SCALE: 1• = 200' - 7�
`Z_i� -. \` �\ \ ' I{ I \ I� I �" 1 \ \ 1 1 � \ \-ter I" �"}t 1 •. j /� \\ /+''�I � J
'110rlL;
�+>t-<`� =a /,tr; y�c ,�ri�fi * i-
1--
L�- \ .. \ \ 1 yt 1 \ I I\ \ \\. \\ y \ \ �\ \ \\ l �1 1II — — —i — '�
O
• I i I 1 \ �\ \\ 1 j I I 1 I as*rsa .a, �\ \ �\ \ \ �, \ I _G-_�.�-�C��� `�=t 1
• ,
�,t_
1 /^\ \ 1 1 \\ 1 III IV I � � �- ' _- - G r.•�' \ s4 \�. I "�'� °� \
III
Ej D//
I I+ I
III
I1
"• ° T I+
�� 4,�III \ 1 It \ -
11 Ii,hIII 1 - \ 1 ♦ ' \
El
I'1 ui��;Iqi I\ ,� I �r d /l � I \ I I \•..,I .� r -• � \I ` 1\`���\ �� ��/ � - \\O
\\ r
1 '\ \ 1
It
♦ y •1 lam
,1 �. � . �j11 � \ \ �� �\ \\� � \\ \ �.• J-J \ �\ L__\ II- \ �._ �+ 1 1 I \ r1^ `J/l 1 / \\ \ \\\��
r-ZX
�► _ r .. Ili. � � � - 11 \ \ ,���� \ A. \\ \ \ / ( ��_ 1 , I \ � \\
erbrearon: DESIGNED:DMR REVISION DATE C
Evolution Cherebyi cwtify that this plan was prepared by me or under my direct sup,
Nson 1.10-4-2013 9 _ CLIENT NAME SHEET SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING and that l=a duty Licensed Professional Enginew under the Lan or the State DRAWN: DMR 2.J T-7-2013 8. —
16790 2nd Street North of M'mneeam. 3.- to.- -
Lakeland Shores. MN 55043 CHECKED:DUR ..-_ 11.- Amaris Company LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
Ph one: 651-303-11M s. 12.
E-mail; sonn obbinsl01 hoo.eom Name Reg-Number DATE 7-26-13 7- �4._ c� 10
20130D1-CON-5TH STREET TO INW'OOD.dwg
e.
;,
\
SCALE! V)
I
A.
--- - \\\ i I 1/ \\\ I li i • ` �e SI' I `` - -\t ``a� /' a '. I; ;
----. \\ �_-�- // � \ � / /r / / .r�, t 1 •\ `\ ems_\ , � 1:
If
Ito
� / - ��� ♦\` '��/ /// \\ \\ 1 I I I I \t 4: I � 1i11 � ,� �•yea _
\\ � � 1 ___ I /! j 1 % { ! '' I• � � � 1 .I I 1 1 \ \`i � /� I 11 ` �4 - - - - � �---
/ / / / \ \ ! / / / / r_ r�•� _ �( `�-' i { __� \ ,4 / - -ice^,` \ "�\\ \
/ / / /' / / / _\ 1 I / / // / / !` � I _ I I 1 � y 1 ) i% •r r• 1 �{-'r 11 l \�\\ \
'rt ` � �t �`-\ II � z\ / I l 1 / 1 / ��:>` -•�itl'
If / +?_s �� -�\
�
Y
// \\ // I 1 / \\ tl � r•�"�,\' . .y-; III 1 I ,l � •f 1 'r � �_ L;-+•���1'::�� - !'�.• .y-8i � t.� 'Y'_r_Y����`-�' _Y °.-
1
//-�\,` \ // •ti, 1 I I 1 t\ \.y \ \\ I I � I\� 1 'r'�rm �.�+'� � � ` 1 --��--1 \\ \\
r-
111 i
A\-
AIR
it
Evolution `"°Q-- a DESIGNED!OUR REM ION DATE CLIENT NAME SHEET
1 nereby comfy that this pion.s p epQed by me or ender my direct wpw..sloe t 10-<-2013 e. SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING ood that 1 om a dwy ticeeeea Rrofeeslond Engnew ceder me La.of tee state IX1AWH1 DyR 2.n-7-2o13 e. -
�` Amaris Company LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
16790 2nd Street North a-- 11.-
p1EDKFA:DNR 6 10
Lakeland Shores, MN 55043 5.- 12.- �
Phone: 651-303-7208 -
E-mail: sonn obbins101 hoo.eom Nome Reg.Number DA"tE: 7-26-13 _ 14._
2013001-CON-5TH STREET TO INWOOD.dwg
,..- !t�\\ dr+r
m\ili$♦l`/ '��/ 141. 1 :�` J'' \ // { \ ---�/ \ 1 � \ \ \\ \ 1 / v3 -t F `'. � 1 1 I r•e
!l I _-
IIIII' ll \�w;r,
IIII 1 II I T \ / �'\ \`/' ♦'' �_' ` `� \ \� ' I 1 , y
Ildfl II11 1/ \ /l { .� \♦ � / \\ / \\ �� \ \ \\ �' / � 1 1 r \ ` I'` r '�
I l!j I I IIII I \\
�! nl \ / III ` / ,------'�\ ♦ \ 1
11/ / 1 I1111.` I �� \ 1 \ \ \` ♦ 1 I \\ \\ s: �. l \`
/ �/II 11 111 1 1 I \ \ I \ / / \ \ \ \� / I I \
O
II1111179,
111 �� - \ \\ �� ♦ ♦ �/ \ 22x34SC
cn
/III t /II {LI 1 I 1: / \ \ //� � ' \ \ \\ t � '^\ \ � ry
�__ / / i `\ �L \ i �� �i
♦ \ ------ / 1 �f t � \
Ip I \ ^O
`��ii`� 'h// 11111: 111 \�I / II \ \� ♦ / /� --'- -\ �w t 1 W
--- — __
� :1 \I I � Ill. I I I I \ l / i \ \ _/ ♦ �\ �
'%/�i ._i�..T�t /��,// \ - _�a__�_ .,_e1r___s_ - _�'_ ---•__-aL / // \1 \\ \-- ��__ �� \\ � �.i //~y*r 1�. 1 i� � F+�1
r=1 %�• � �eKc �._�- __.ra—--Yam--ee�_� _.-._._ a__ -� '^� // 1 \ `'�� \\ f �� �Ss I:, * l
E/r 11 1111 �\ ' '/ 1 / '\'a ' tea+ \ \ \ \ ♦\ ``�•��-.. �'�\ /' �_ ��.1 !/
1 I I I --.r ----I ♦\ ��\ ��\ �♦i/ �` � ''�� I
I11 -�\ \\ 1 1Jr
Imo- - �� I 1\!\•�, I[ 11 II I 1 \\ / / / /' \\ \ \\ �`^ -__ `" \� ` \\ \\ I +.-'- \��� \\\ I (/ ', "
II 'Fk is
I J471
i ice/ I \ I 11 I \\ I lltl-'/ /� �/ -�/ \ / // / / / ---- / --- .. \ \ \ \ �\ _` .�1 •.�
fill
�\
,y\` 1{ // 11 I 1 I I I / / \ \\ \ I l \\ \\ / /�� / / / ��� . \ \ ♦\ \\ \\ 1 1 +may }.G� -_ --_r ci.
//'"_ `���,' I 1 1 1 I I I�I '-�/ / r� \\ \\ \\ 1\ \�� \ / // / // '/ / `���� ♦\ \\ \ \ � 11 �'e�'.t RZe ,�'� +
ter/ s I 11 I It✓ ! \ \ \\ I l / \ / / ��� ��/ �� \\ �\
I I
C I III / / I 1 \\ \ \ \ \ ` �' '-`---_ ----'
\It
It
Or
`,
i
; I I I I
ATE
ati
VO u ion Chw'eby`Hairy that this plan.as prepared by me or under my direct supervision DESIGNED:UMR L10514N2013 8_ - CLIENT NAME SHEET
ENGINEERING and that i am o duty Lice need Prureesianal Engine.under the La.at the state DRA": DMR 2.1T-7-2013 9. - SHEET NO.
16790 2nd Street North of M�nae>ata 3.- 10.—
Lakeland Shores, MN 55043 CHECKED:DM
4.-_ ,,.-_ Amaris Company, LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
Phone: 651-303-720B 5. tz" 7
E-mail: sons Dbbin5101 hoo.0pm Name Reg. Number DATE: 7-26-t1 7- 14;_ ` 10
2013001-CON-5TH STREET TO INWOOD.dwg
Ton=.94.79 7
1 l 7.
` ygvl'1', t t,�
i f p •�= Alb 11 cd
_N I,FIt1 I 6 S' 100 . t o zuo 0
E L � � ' 2204 SCALE: I" "-tow' (n
r• L. 11.17 SCALE: 1' = 200'
Pc 22.s33.t,4
503 47'087
•
---- ------------ -L- A------- - n • '- '• M
`p 11 598.58' 1 _ _--
, t �� o 0 0 \ 11
6W-) Vo I, El
00. 'i ❑ j 1 ❑ D
1 �----
1\ r` rr
a k\.t\ 1 _. El D
Ili ao ❑ ❑
n � �
_ a
avt ❑EI
.r
00.63
PT= 16 = 75+74.77
❑ ; o o � , 1 ❑❑a
o \ \
L=100a.55 0 , \
6 \\ Tan-625.17 —
dv86'1T30'
mr
El
\
1
Evolution cd`'`"°tlm DESDNED Drag 1'110- N oats CLIENT NAME SHEET
hereby certify toot this piaa•as prepared by me m under my drect wp•nesion t.M ION D 3 e. - SHEET NO.
ENGINEERING d thal I an°duly Licensed Pr°Nosimal EngtI, °odor th•Law°r the Stote DRANT10 DyR 2.11-7-2013 9. —
16790 2nd Street North o1�X1OC'°t' 3.- TO,-
Lokeiand Shores. MN 55043 a+ECNED:DNR 5.- 12.— Amaris Company, LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
Phone: 651-303-7208 6.- 1Y- 8 0
E-mail: soon obbins101 hoo.eom Nome Reg.Number DAtE: 7-26-13 7— 14.—
2013001-CON-STH STREET TO INW000-dwg
IF71
\ S51'28'25"E �.�—f.!Z-4
22r34 SCALE: 1' a0:;' [1]
11.17$CdU: i" :C; y
TZ
.�+. per
s y
R.667.00
L=555.15
Ton-294.79
t M4T41'17• � _
.14•w t � 22+83 54
-C a I / t
~ I S03'47'08'E
"...s.. '�' " .y t t 71, 1. t
r --•
8 - ------- -- `
gip, S03'4T08"E --------------- - i-------
ono \
� \
1 3t t
El\ '
PT = 16 T s 15.74.71 D o❑ ❑
El
PLC 3
Evolutipn I hw a1on DE9CNED'DMR jr10—Del 013 CLIENT NAME
^�� a�tif that ~,a p1 •aa SHEET SHEET NO.
y y prepared by me a under my aired porNsion 1.7D-a-p013 B. CLIENT
and that I am a tluly Licenaatl Profeealond Enginaar antler the Lo=of the State DRAWN: DMR 2.I1-7-2013 9. —
16790 2nd Street North of Mtnnasota. 3.— 10.
S• -
Lakeland Shores, MN 55043 CHECKED:OMR 4.-_ ,,._- Amaris Company, LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
Phone: 651-303-7208 7z.
E-mail; Bonn obbin5101 hao.cM Name Reg.Number DATE; 7-26-13 j:_ 14__ W Q
2013001-CON-5TH STREET TO INWOOD-d.9
' �
.,. 22><341 SCAl,Er'i" - 100'=. V]
l �+ '_el i Ltx17 SCAt i 1' - 200" "'�
<@o3e.
O
+ea
+ R=667.00
•*`\` a L=448-50 • a Tan=233.10VW
T ZeL t
�• �e Myy�
N
• --rs - S90'00'00'E
70356 `*,I � �� b�>< t. re. +MUU�•„e .� ' tl
Nw
oil
� � I
O � �
H i \�\ •e 3 s sh (l r
ra
1 . _ ._ _ _ __ _ __ _ � -^r^'`r'-- _-.� • `�\ 551 2B'25'E �- ` c +y.•
1580.05'
\ +�
• 3 I
�v 4`
_ I
ti�ti� •w
a
• H 9 � • !K
- r v
H-56T.00
5)5.15
v
v V lu�,lOn `4 Q OATE
by•-tlty Ihnt thl,plen wm prapQed by ms or ands mr drect wper•rvicn pESICNEp��R iR 1;0$14N2013 � - CLIENT NAME SHEET
ENGINEERING and that I am a duly Lic.ne.d Prof..f.bl En9maer ends the Law or the Stala p��; pNR 2.11-7-2013 9. - _ SHEET NO.
16790 2nd Street North of t,.-,•ta. 3__ Amaris Company LLC 5th Street Alignment to Inwood
lokelond Shores, MN 55043 CHECKED:DfIR 5- 12.- i`� 10
Phone: 651-303-7205 6.- 13.-
E-moil: soon obbins101 hoo.com Name Reg.Number OATEo 7-26-iJ z- 14.-
2013001-CON-5TH STREET TO INWOOD.dwq
0 '
�I� 1111111
G
I
�lIS111111■
ource: Esri, Digi4alGlobe,GeoEye,i-cubed, U•DA, USGS,AE ,Getmappin.g,
- Aerggnd, IGN, I,G.P,swisstopo„and the GIS User CoMI,MI,unit
Location Map: Boulder Ponds PUD
THE CITY OF
LA K E ELM) 0 250 500 1,000 Feet
SOMIZI Boulder Ponds Site I i i i I i i i I
Data Scource: Washington County, MN 1"=500'
12-4-2013
FOCUSENGINEERING, inc.
MEMORANDUM
Cara Geheren, P.E. 651.300.4261
Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264
Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267
Date: November 20, 2013 Chad Isakson,P.E. 651.300.4285
To: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Re: Bolder Ponds
Cc: Nick Johnson, City Planner Concept Plat Review
From: Jack Griffin, P.E., City Engineer
We have reviewed the above referenced Concept Plan submittal that we received on November 18, 2013
consisting of the following documentation prepared by Evolution Engineering:
• Concept PUD Plans dated November 7, 2013.
• 5th Street Alignment Bremer Parking Impacts dated November 7, 2013.
STATUS/FINDINGS: No specific approvals are intended from this review. The comments below have been
provided for the purpose to facilitate direction and guidance for both City staff and the applicant; as well as
highlight potential issues and concerns as the applicant prepares for preliminary plat submittal.
VARIANCE REQUEST:
• The applicant is requesting a variance from the city street pavement section to ONLY require a 12-inch
select granular subbase in areas with unsuitable in-situ materials. It is strongly recommended that all new
city streets be constructed in strict accordance with the minimum engineering design standards manual to
ensure that the city streets provide the intended useful service life of the asset. The purpose of the
standard section requirements is to keep the asset from premature failure and avoid the cost burden that
would fall upon the general tax payer of Lake Elmo.
• Side yard setback of 5 feet. Any allowance to deviate from the side yard setback should be conditioned
upon proof of an acceptable drainage plan, with drainage NOT passing along that side of the structure.
• Front yard setback of 20 feet.Any allowance to deviate from the front yard setback should be conditioned
upon ensuring a minimum distance of 25 feet between the garage door and any sidewalk or trail along the
street to keep vehicles parked in the driveway from obstructing the pedestrian throughway.
STREET SECTIONS:
• The applicant is proposing a roadway configuration that is generally acceptable and in accordance with
city standard requirements.
• Primary and secondary access appears adequate for the site. The proposed access along Hudson
Boulevard will require further review to determine access spacing and sight lines.
• Detailed grades and sight lines will require further review to ensure the intersection design and
configuration of 5th Street North and the new "STREET A" meet acceptable MSA standards.
• Typical sections for each road will be reviewed in further detail as part of the preliminary plat. Issues for
staff to consider in greater detail include:
■ Sidewalk and trail placement and requirements. Sidewalks and trails must remain within the R/W.
PAGE 1 of 4
■ Street geometrics varying from the city standard will require significant geometric detail from the
applicant, as part of the preliminary plat, to verify acceptable use for maintenance and emergency
services.This includes intersection and cul-de-sac details.
CONCEPT PHASING:
• The concept phasing must be revised to accommodate the construction of all public infrastructures
adjacent to any proposed areas to be platted within said phase. For example,the northeast segment of 5th
Street connecting to the Lennar development must be constructed together with the lots platted adjacent
and to the north of this street. The segment of 5th Street along the southeast side of the Bremer bank
property should also be constructed at the same time that the lots adjacent to the segment are platted
(also Phase 1 according to this plan).
5TH STREET ALIGNMENT: 5th Street seeks to become the backbone of future development along the 194
corridor, essentially becoming the primary access in and out of the future neighborhoods. The street is
required for the sole purpose to support the growth and development within the corridor. The quality of the
street and its connections are critically important. The purpose of the proposed street standards are to 1)
improve the function and appearance of the street, 2) encourage pedestrian and bicycle use, and 3) reduce the
potential for speeding.
• The plan indicates a minimum 120 foot R/W as required.
• The proposed 2-lane collector parkway street (5th Street) design and geometrics must meet all Municipal
State Aid design standards for urban streets (8820.9936) for ADT > 10,000; 40 mph design speed; and
must be consistent with the detailed parkway cross section installed throughout the remaining corridor
segments.
• The proposed alignment appears to be consistent with this design intent. However, the proposed plan
indicates impacts to adjacent properties. Permission to impose these impacts will be required as needed.
• Access spacing to 5th Street is allowed at 1/8 mile intervals for non-continuous local streets, at % mile
intervals for continuous local streets and collector streets, and at % mile intervals for streets with higher
classification.
• Additional streetscape amenities are required along 5th Street consistent with the remaining corridor
segments and the preliminary design that was provided to the city by Damon Farber. 5th Street Amenities
include:
• North side off-road bituminous trail, minimum 10 foot width with 5 foot clear zone.
• South side concrete sidewalk, minimum 6 foot width with 2 foot clear zone.
Landscaping elements including: Center landscape median [combination perennial/shrub beds + sod
+ median trees]. Center median lined with 2 ft. wide concrete ribbon curb. Boulevard trees
[boulevard trees, deciduous trees at 2.5" caliper in. minimum + ornamental trees at 1.5" caliper in.
minimum.Tree spacing at 75 feet on both sides. Special concrete in median [pavers or color concrete
at end caps of median]. Landscape Berms, 3 to 5 feet in height, between residential property and
street R/W. Site Irrigation.
• Theming Elements including: Street Lights-25 ft. poles at 250 ft. spacing [Xcel Energy- 'Evans' Lamp].
Ornamental Street Lights— 15 ft. poles at intersections [Xcel Energy - 'Acorn' Lamp]. Banner Poles at
primary gateway intersections. White post& rail fencing along important arterial streets.
RESIDENTIAL STREETS
• The plan indicates all residential streets being constructed to a 28 foot width from back of curb to back of
curb. Surmountable concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in single family residential areas and B618
curb in commercial and multi-family areas.
• The plan indicates a minimum 60 foot R/W as required.
• Ten (10) utility easements are required on either side of the right-of-way.
• Five (5)foot sidewalks must be provided along all continuous residential streets and along other streets as
may be required for connectivity.
PAGE 2 of 4
• All street intersections must be at 90 degrees and maintain 100 feet of tangent with maximum slopes of
2%for first 100 feet.
• Residential maximum longitudinal grade is 8%with no sidewalks, 6%where there are sidewalks.
• The plan indicates minimum diameter cul-de-sac's at 90 feet with minimum 120 foot right-of-ways.
• Landscape median geometrics must accommodate maintenance and emergency vehicle access.
Applicants must demonstrate acceptable turning radii for all unique shaped center landscape medians at
cul-de-sacs.
MUNICIPAL WATER AND SANITARY SEWER SERVICE
• The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal water and sanitary sewer service into the
development site at developers cost. The city's practice has been to reimburse the developer for oversize
costs for pipe sizes over 8-inch diameter. Both municipal water supply and sanitary sewer service will be
available along Hudson Blvd.
• The subject property is a participant in the SECTION 34 Water and Sewer Utility Improvement project.
Water and sewer are being extended to the property through a city led project with the costs to be
assessed against the property. Water and sewer service will be available to the site in December 2013.
• A connecting trunk watermain is identified in the city comp plan along the northern part of the property,
extending from the Lennar development to the east, across the subject property and connecting to the
Eagle Point Business Park or Azur property. Details may be determined as part of the preliminary plat
submittal.
• WATERMAIN DETAILS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
• Watermain distribution lines will need to be looped wherever reasonably possible. Maximum
length of for a watermain dead end is 600 feet.
• Hydrant and valve placement will be made per city standards and as laid out by city staff.
• Curb stops to be placed to edge of right-of-way.
• Location of watermain in street [North or West side].
• SANITARY SEWER DETAILS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT
• Manhole and appurtenances shall be installed per city standards.
• Location of sewer main in street [Centerline].
STORMWATER MANAGEMENT
• The proposed development resides within the South Washington Watershed District (SWWD). City staff
recommends early planning/coordination meetings with the watershed district to clearly understand
development requirements, including rate and volume control.
• The design of the storm water management systems must be compliant with the requirements of the
applicable watershed district and the City of Lake Elmo. The City of Lake Elmo maintains engineering
design standards intended to ensure an efficient and cost effective stormwater management system for
both operation and maintenance purposes.
• The storm water facilities must be platted as Outlots and deeded to the city for maintenance purposes.
• Maintenance access roads must be provided for the storm water facilities including easements.
• Location of storm sewer main in street [South or East side].
EXISTING CONDITIONS DATA:
• Existing conditions of the proposed site was not fully provided as part of the submittal. Some information
is apparent from the aerial drawings and contour mapping, however, the applicant should be required to
identify all exiting utilities, utility owners, pipe material and sizes, pipe invert data, easements and right-
of-ways clearly identified, and identifying the normal and high water levels for existing low areas including
wetland and floodplain boundaries.
• The plans do not show the existence of a Lot within the proposed plat boundaries [PID 3402921330002].
Removal and remediation of this site will need to be addressed as a condition of preliminary plat.
PAGE 3 of 4
GENERAL PLAN AND SPECIFICATION PREPARATION COMMENTS:
• When preparing preliminary plat, final plat and construction plans, the applicant should reference the
engineering design standards manual and strictly follow the plan preparation and design requirements.
Plan sheets, plan scales, line types and legends, sections, details, profiles, existing conditions and
proposed improvements shall all be prepared consistent with these requirements. Line types cannot be
repeated.
• Plan details shall be inserted on the details page as provided by the city with no edits, unless specifically
allowed by the city engineer.
• Plan notes shall be placed on the appropriate plan sheet as provided by the city with no edits, unless
specifically allowed by the city engineer.
• City standard specifications shall be inserted within the specification manual unedited. Specification edits
shall be called out on separate specification sections as special provisions.
PAGE 4 of 4
From: Moore,
To: Nick Johnson
Cc: Loomis,John
Subject: RE: December Land Use Review
Date: Tuesday,December 03,2013 12:17:51 PM
Nick:
A quick comment,they will have to apply for a watershed district permit for stromwater design and they have
submitted a Wetland Conservation Act delineation,however the application was deemed incomplete and will need
to be re-submitted in the spring.
Let us know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Matt Moore
Administrator
South Washington Watershed District
2302 Tower Drive
Woodbury,MN 55125
Phone: 651-714-3729
Fax:651-714-3721
Cell:651-249-7096
mmoore@ci.woodbury.mn.us<BLOCKED::mai Ito•mmoore@ci woodbury mn us>
www.swwdmn.org<BLOCKED::hU-//www.swwdmn.org>
From:Nick Johnson[mailto•NJohnson&lakeeImo or_g]
Sent:Friday,November 29,2013 11:32 AM
To:Moore,Matt;'Jack Griffin';Mike Bouthilet;Greg Malmquist
Cc:Kyle Klatt;'Ann Pung-Terwedo';Dean Zuleger
Subject:December Land Use Review
Please find attached a Land Use Review for the December 9th Lake Elmo Planning Commission. Hard copies will
be mailed today. Let me know if you have any questions.
Fkl' Q � � Yb 6007 Culligan Way
' E k F+ Minnetonka MN 55345 s
phone 952.288.2200 j
fax 952.473.2206
A Development Company www.stonehenge-usaxom j
{
1
November 1, 2013
i
Nick Johnson i
City Planner
City of Lake Elmo
3800 Laverne Avenue North
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Reference: 5t" Street Road Alignment
Dale Properties, Lennar, Amaris
Dear Nick,
This letter is to inform the City of Lake Elmo that Dale Properties, Lennar and Amaris
Company are working collaboratively on the realignment of 5t" Street consistent with the
needs and requirements of Dale Properties, Lennar and Amaris. We have reached a
general understanding on the realignment and the Dale Properties sale of the raw land
remnant parcel moving north of 5t" street to Lennar and Amaris. j
i
We are working out the details, with our attorneys, for the land sale and road alignment
culminating in a purchase and sale agreement. When the agreement is finalized and all
parties are signatory, I will cooperate with signing the necessary applications that are
required by the City of Lake Elmo related to this matter.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
Sincerely
Alan Dale
I
i
i
i