Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutItem 13 - Savona Final Plat Attachments T1 11 C;I`6'1 OF PLANNING COMMISSION LAKE I�L_ DATE:2/10/13 I AGENDA ITEM: 5A-BuSINESS ITEM CASE#2014-04 ITEM: Savona Residential Subdivision—Final Plat(Phase 1) SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt,Planning Director REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Final Plat request from Lennar Corporation for the first please of a planned 310 unit residential development to be located on 1.12.6 acres west of Keats Avenue and within the City's I-94 corridor planning area. The final plat will include 44 single-family lots, all of which will be accessed via an initial extension of the 5"' Street Parkway off of Keats Avenue. Staff is recommending approval of the request subject to compliance with a series of conditions as listed in this report. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar, 16305 36t"Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth,MN Property Owners: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar, 16305 361h Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth,MN Location: Part of Section 34 in Lake Elmo,north of I-94, west of Keats Avenue, and south of Goose Lake. PID Numbers 34.029.21.42.0002; 34.029.21.41,0004 Request: Application for final plat approval of a 44 unit residential subdivision to be named Savona. Existing Land Use and Zoning. Agricultural land,closed and abandoned golf driving range and practice facility. Current Zoning: RT—Rural Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR and MDR Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North—active mining and gravel operation; west, south and east —agricultural land Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential(2.5 —4 units per acre)and Urban Medium Density Residential (4.5—7 units per acre) History: Sketch Plan review by Planning Commission on 12/10/12. EAW approved by the City Council on 7/2/13. Preliminary Plat approved on 8/6/13 Deadline.forAction: Application Complete— 1/21/14 60 Day Deadline—3/21/14 Extension Letter Mailed—No PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a— BUSINESS ITEM 7 120 Day Deadline—5/21/14 Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153—Subdivision Regulations Article 10—Urban Residential Districts(LDR) §150.270 Storm Water,Erosion, and Sediment Control REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received a request from Lennar Corporation for final plat approval of the first phase of the Savona residential development. The final plat includes 44 single family residential lots and the infrastructure necessary to support the future homes on these lots. The City Council approved the Savona Preliminary Plat on August 6,2013,which covered 113 acres of land within the 1-94 Corridor planning area. There are 310 single family and multi-family residential units planned within the entire subdivision,and the final plat covers only a portion of the overall total of units that will eventually he platted. Lennar has finalized its purchase of the land included in the final plat area, and is acting as the sole applicant for this request. The final plat area represents the initial project phase of the overall Savona development, and will include the construction of the first phase of the 5'Street minor collector road. The developer intends to build homes in the subdivision moving generally from the east to the west, extending infrastructure to serve each phase with future projects. Likewise,the developer will be grading the site in phases as well,with all of the phase one grading occurring within the limits of the final plat. This grading will be necessary to establish the overall storm water management system on the site, but the plan will be revised when the individual lots are created as part of a future development phase. The applicant has submitted detailed construction plans for related to sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer,grading, drainage, erosion control, landscaping, and other details that have been reviewed by the City Engineer. The City's subdivision ordinance establishes the procedure for obtaining final subdivision approval, in which case a final plat may only be reviewed after the City takes action on a preliminary plat. As long as the final plat is consistent with the preliminary approval, it must be approved by the City. Please note that the City's approval of the Savona Preliminary Plat did include a series of conditions that must be met by the applicant,which are addressed in the "Review and Analysis"section below. There are no public hearing requirements for a final plat. Because the City has not yet established zoning for any of the properties along the 1-94 Corridor outside of the RT—Rural Transitional Zone, Staff has prepared a zoning snap amendment for the Savona area that will be considered by the Planning Commission at its February 10`h meeting. With the proposed final plat area, all of the property north of 5`h Street will be LDR(Urban Low Density Residential)and the larger outiot south of 51h Street will be MDR(Urban Medium Density Residential). Staff has reviewed the final plat and found that it is consistent with the preliminary plat that was approved by the City. The developer has recently updated the preliminary plan submissions to comply with the conditions of approval, and the final plat application incorporates these updates as well. Please note that the final plat now includes proposed street names,while the construction plans have not yet been updated to reflect this information. The City Engineer has reviewed the final plat, and his comments are attached to this report. Although there are some additional revisions to the final construction plans that will need to be addressed by the applicant, the majority of these revisions can be made before the City releases the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 3 final plat for recording. The Engineer does denote four issues that could impact the final plat; and Staff is recommending a condition of approval for each of these(which means that they must be addressed in order for any final approvals to be granted. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS The preliminary plat for Savona was approved with several conditions,which are indicated below along with Staff's comments on the status of each. For those items and issues that are not directly addressed below, Staff has provided additional comments following the preliminary plat conditions list. Staff is recommending approval of the final plat,but with additional conditions intended to address the outstanding issues that will require additional review and/or documentation. Please also note that the applicant has also provided a response to the preliminary plat conditions and their response is included as an attachment to this report. Preliminary Plat Conditions—With Staff Update Comments(updated information in bold italics). 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval,the applicant shall complete the following: a)the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney;b)the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat; c) the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. Comments:a)all title work will need to be submitted and reviewed by the City Attorney before an City officials sign the final plat;b)the applicant has submitted an escrow payment related to the preliminary plat application that is being used to cover Staff and consultant expenses related to the City's review,c) revised preliminary plat and plans have been received by the City and were found to address all previous comments. No grading has occurred on the site to date, and the City is proceeding with a review of the ,final plat 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the"Exception"parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight-foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room for drainage and utilities adjacent to"Street A". Comments: The preliminary plat and plans have been revised to address this condition. Although the applicant is proposing to use a portion of the street right-of-way for the trail, there is a 30-foot area around all portions of*the exception parcel for the trail. This proposed configuration is a reasonable compromise to still provide access to the exception parcel. 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green belt/buffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. Comments: The applicant is proposing to acquire an easement from the adjacent property owner in order to account for the buffer requirement. Staff has found this alternative to be an acceptable approach since it cannot be accomplished without the implicit approval of the effected property owner in Stonegate. ff no agreement can be reached between the applicant and neighboring property owner, the final plat for this area will need to account for the b"ffer. Because the current.final plat does not impact this portion of the site, this condition may be addressed as part c f aficture final plaf PUBLIC HEARING ITEM Sa— BUSINESS ITEM 4 4) The eight-foot bituminous trail located within Outlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to"Street A". Comments: The preliminary plans have been updated to address this requirement. 5) The trail within the green belt/buffer area is encouraged to be located within the southern one- third or eastern one-third of the buffer and as close as possible to the lots within the Savona subdivision. Comments: The preliminary plans have been updated to address this requirement. The applicant further notes that the "design and plans have been revised to shift the trail to the southern portion oj�tl:e bt{ffer outlot,except as otherwise required due to grading,drainage, and topography challenges. The trail meanders to provide for a pleasant user experience, avoids the existing wetland, and minimizes impacts on property owners on either side". b) The sidewalk along"Street A"must continue along this street until its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. Comments: The preliminary plans have been updated accordingly, but it outside the scope public improvements planned for phase 1. 7) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Keats Avenue. Comments: The applicant notes that they have identified a preferred alignment for a trail along Keats Avenue,but this alignment is not depicted in the final construction plans Staff as recommending that this trail be included as part of the final plans. 8) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. Comments: Tree preservation fencing has been added to the final plans. 9) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of a final plat and final construction plans. Comments: Staff has previously reviewed the tree preservation and protection plan and found the plan to be in compliance with the City Code. The proposed boulevard plantings conform to the City'.�V planting requirements for streets. Staff is still seeking an independent review o f the landscape plans that will need to be completed prior to the City's acceptance of final construction documents. 10)Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi-family housing portion of the subdivision. Comments. The preliminary plans have been updated 11)The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue(CSAH 19)right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3,2013. The required improvements shall include,but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten-foot bituminous trail through the median,tum lanes,and other improvements as required by the County. Comments: The final construction plans have been modified to include all requirement improvements as requested by Washington County. The Citi,will need to verify that these plans have received final approval by the Count', PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 5 12)The applicant shall observe all other County requirements as specified in the Washington County review letter dated July 3, 2013. Comments: The,fnal construction plans have been revised in response to these comments. 13)The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. Comments: The applicant has received a permit from the Valley Branch Watershed District(attached)for the grading work proposed in the final plans. This permit includes conditions that must be In et prior to the commencement of any grading work on the site. 14)The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically, the rearrangement of lots around the "Exception" parcel. Comments: The revised lot configuration has been included its the updated preliminary plans. 15)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. Comments: The applicant has indicated that there will be a homeowner's association created for this development,however, the City has not yet received documentation that this association has been established. A maintenance agreement and evidence that the HCA has been established should be retained as a condition of approval for the final plat: 16)The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair inarket value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. Comments: Staff still needs to review the updated preliminary plat with the applicant to determine the final park land dedication calculations. Staff is recommending that any payment of fees in lieu of land dedication (if required)be pro- rated based on the percentage of the final plat area compared to the entire Savona development. 17)Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. Comments: The dedication of land associated with trails will be reviewed in accordance with the preceding condition 18)The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area(either public or private) within the multi-family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Comments: The revised preliminary plans include a small play area within the multi-fatesily area. The details concerning this play area will need to be submitted with a final plat.for the townhouse area. 19)No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat(155)may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south, Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)to the west, or back to Keats PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 6 Avenue (CSAH 19)through the property to the north of Savona. Comments: The proposed final plat includes 44 units, which means the applicant may plat an additional III units before this condition needs to be met. 20)A future realignment of Stb Street along the western border of the plat may be considered by the City Council as part of the final plat submission for this are provided the realignment does not result in any significant modifications to the preliminary plat. Comments: (riven the other pending developments in this area and the need to establish a final alignment for 5'Street sooner than later, Staff has requested that the applicant provide a signed affidavit from all impacted property owners in this area agreeing to the necessary land transactions needed to perform the road re-alignment Staff is not recommending that the City Council take action on the final plat application until this document is submitted to the City. Since this re- alignment falls outside the scope of the proposed improvements, Staff is does not believe this issue should prevent the Commission from makings its recommendation to the City Council. 21)The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. Comments: The applicant is intending to commence grading shortly after the City approval of the final plat, therefore, this condition will not pertain to those portions of the preliminary plat that have already received final approval,from the City. 22)The preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. Comments: The applicant has provided additional documentation to the City Engineer regarding the storm water management ponds in conjunction with the revised preliminary plans. As noted above, these plans have been approved by the Valley Branch Watershed District subject to conditions of approval. 23)The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate all proposed improvements within the 5`h Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Dainon Farber and Associates. Comments: Since the approval of the Savona Preliminary Plat, the City has complete final design specifications for 5"Street and has forwarded these plans to the applicant The final construction plans as submitted are very close to the City's final design, but may need small revisions to fully comply with the City's standards. 24) All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9, 2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas line, if necessary. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 7 b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities,and storm water ponding. Comments:the final construction plans include work within the power line easement, and the applicant has not yet submitted any written documentation to the City that this work will be authorized by the easement holder: The applicant's response to the conditions of approval notes that they have been in contact with this easement holder, and that there do not appear to be any issues with obtaining this formal permission. Staff is recommending that this condition be carried forward as part of the City's final plat approval, nhich means that the final plat would need to be revised if the applicant is not able to secure the necessary consent. 25)The City will not accept an application for final plat approval until the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 has been ordered by the City Council.If the City Council does not order this project,the applicant must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. Comments: The Section 34 public improvement project has been ordered by the City and the project is substantially complete as of today's date. 26)The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi-family area,including but not limited to a conditional use pen-nit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street,at the time a final plat is submitted for this area. Comments: The final plat will not create any multi family lots, which will be platted as part of a future development phase. 27)The applicant is encouraged to preserve or re-use as many trees as possible that are currently located on the former golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. Comments: The applicant has stated their intent to preserve these trees if possible, however, based on observed site conditions, it does not appear that maiq of these trees will be salvageable due to the sandy soil conditions 28)The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. Comments: The applicant has agreed to the street names as proposed by Staff. The proposed name's have been designed to comply with the Coumn y's uniform addressing system. Staff is recommending that the conditions noted above that pertain to the final plat and that have not yet been addressed by the applicant should be adopted with the final plat. The City Engineer's review letter does identify several issues that need to be addressed by the developer in order for the City to deem the final plans complete; however,nearly all of these concerns are related to the construction plans and should not have any bearing on the final plat. Staff is recommending that City Officials not sign the final plat mylars until the City's construction plan review is finalized and all necessary easements are documented on the final plat. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 8 Based on the above Staff report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the final plat with several conditions intended to address the outstanding issues noted above and to further clarify the City's expectations in order for the developer to proceed with the recording of the final plat. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions of Approval. 1) Final grading,drainage, and erosion control plans,utility plans, sanitary and storm water management plans, and street and utility construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer prior to the recording of the Final Plat. All changes and modifications to the plans requested by the City Engineer shall be incorporated into these documents before they are approved. 2) The developer shall provide evidence in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney that warrants it has fee interest in area included in the Savona Final Plat. 3) Prior to the execution of the Final Plat by City officials, the Developer shall enter into a Developer's Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney and approved by the City Council that delineates who is responsible for the design,construction, and payment of the required improvements with financial guarantees therefore. 4) All easements as requested by the City Engineer and Public Works Department shall be documented on the Final Plat prior to the execution of the final plat by City Officials. 5) A Common Interest Agreement concerning management of the common areas of Savona and establishing a homeowner's association shall be submitted in final form to the Community Development Director before a building permit may be issued for any structure within this subdivision. The applicant shall also enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat 6) The applicant shall work with the City to determine the required park land dedication for the entire Savona subdivision prior to the recording of the final plat. Any payments in lieu of land dedication for the entire subdivision will be pro-rated based on the percentage of the overall subdivision included in the final plat. 7) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect prior to the City's final approval of the construction plans. 8) The applicant shall provide evidence that all conditions attached the Valley Branch Watershed District permit for the final plat and associated grading work have been met prior to the commencement of any grading activity. 9) The applicant must provide written authorization to perform the proposed.work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas prior to the release of the final plat for recording. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe,grading activities, and storm water ponding. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a--BUSINESS ITEM 9 10)The applicant shall provide evidence that Washington County has approved final construction plans for all required work within the Keats Avenue right-of-way as described in a letter from the County dated July 3,2013. 11)The final construction plans related to the 5" Street Minor Collector road shall be revised to be consistent with the City's design specifications for this road. These revisions shall be reviewed in conjunction with the other changes requested by the City Engineer. 12)The final construction plans shall be revised to incorporate a multi-purpose trail within the western portion of the Keats Avenue right-of-way and north of 5"'Street consistent with Washington County design specifications. 13)The final construction plans shall be revised to include the additional storm sewer elements and street construction as specified in a review letter from the City Engineer dated February 7, 2014. These revisions shall be reviewed in conjunction with the other changes requested by the City Engineer. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Savona preliminary plat: • That the Savona Final Plat is consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Plans as approved by the City of Lake Elmo on August 8,2013 and revised on November 25,2013. • That the Savona Final Plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. • That the Savona.Final Plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential zoning district. • That the Savona Final Plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water, sediment and erosion control and other ordinances. • That the Savona Final Plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. • That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the City's engineering standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated February 7, 2014. RECCOMENDATI®N: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Final Plat for Savona with the 13 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval®f the Savona Final Plat with the 13 conditions of'approvarl(is draftcDd kt,Staff PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM 10 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Form 2. Preliminary Plat Response(Westwood Engineering) 3. City Engineer Review Letter 4. Valley Branch Watershed District Permit 5. Construction Plans:Grading,Drainage,and Erosion Control G. Construction Plans: Sanitary Sewer,Water Main, Storm Sewer and Streets 7. Phase 1 Landscape Plans 8. Post-Development Drainage Area Plan ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction.......................................................................................Planning Staff - Report by Staff..................................................................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission............................Chair&Commission Members Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair&Commission Members - Action by the Commission.....................................Chair&Commission Members PUBLIC NEARING ITEM 5a—BUSINESS ITEM Fee $ City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM El Comprehensive Plan Amendment El Variance * (See below) Reside" I on -11, t t '10 S' D Zoning District:Amendment ❑Minor Subdivision Prelirninar)cAi�'nall�NaL - 01-10 0 0 .1.0 0� El Text.Amendment El Lot Line Adjustment 0 .11—20 Lots /V 21 Lots or More f-1 Flood Plain C.U.P. ❑Residential Subdivision E)Excavating&Grading Permit Conditional.Use.Permit Sketch/Concept Plan El Appeal F]PuD ❑Conditional Use Permit(C.U.P,) n Site&Building Plan Review APPLICANT i V q. (Iftffing Address) (ZIP) TELEPHONES, le .J (Home) (Wank) (Mobite). (Fax) FE15 OWNER tA.., (Mailing Address) (zip) TELEPH ONES. (Home) (Work) (Mobile) (Fax) PROPERTY LOCATION(Address and Complete(Long)Legal Description): -SE C- A-fl Az,�LJ jv DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST:---f e -I— f;PW qW A- S-C A- 5vvwV74 � *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in: Seaton 301.060 C of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code,the Applicant must demonstrate ahardship before avariance,can be granted. The hardship related to this-application is as fatlows: In signing this application,thereby-acknowledge that I have read and futly understand the appli cable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures., J further-acknowledge the fee=lartation.as outlined in the Uplication uog�c-td--ures and hereby agree to pay,all statements rg�-eived Rom the City pertaining to additional ARplication gKpgnse, Sign�tufelof Applicant i We SIgnature of Applioant Date 1/2212001 City of Lake Flmo•3800 Laverne Avenue North•Lake Orno-55042-651-777-5511)•Fax 65071-9615 Westwood Profsssional Services November 26, 2013 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie,MN 55344 MAm 952-937.5150 Fax 952-93M822 TOLL FREE 1-888-937-5150 b M A I L wpsQwestwoodps.com Kyle Klatt www.westwoodp.wm Planning Director W City of Lake Elmo Westwood 3800 Laverne Ave North Lake Elmo,MN 55042 Re: Savona Preliminary Plat Conditions of Approval File 0000.5 6 5.00 Dear Kyle: As part of the Preliminary Plat approval for Savona, a number of conditions were incorporated into the resolution that needed to be met or addressed prior to the City's acceptance of a Final Plat application. We have revised the preliminary plan sets to address these conditions in advance of our Final Plat application. Revised preliminary plans are included for your review. The following is a point by point response to each of the conditions of approval and outlines how we have addressed each item. NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve the preliminary plat for Savona subject to the following conditions: 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall complete the following: a)the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney; b)the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat, c)the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval.All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for,final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. la: To be submitted,with final plat. Ib: It Lennar's understanding that all fees relating to the preliminary plat are current. If there are any fees outstanding,please submit an invoice directly to Lennar. lc: Plans are attached. 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the "Exception"parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight-foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room for drainage and utilities adjacent to "Street A". r S TA 8 t I S P.I.1i 1 N 1 9 7 2 TWIN CITIES/METRO ST.CLOUD BFIAINEFtD November 25, 2013 Page 2 Design and plans have been revised to accommodate a minimum of 30' land area around the NW exception parcel, as measured from property line to back of curb. Westwood 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green behlbuffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots I and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. Design and plans provide for a 100' green belt/buffer adjacent to Stonegate properties. While this buffer distance is reduced on our property to 50' wide in the vicinity of Lots 1 & 2, we have been in discussions with the adjacent property owner in regards to the acquisition of a trail/greenway easement to meet the required 100' buffer width. This proposed easement area is noted on the plans, and falls entirely within the existing overhead powerline easement so as to not further encumber this property. 4) The eight foot bituminous trail located within ®utlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to "Street A". Plans have been revised accordingly. S) The trail within the green behlbuffer area must be located within the southern one-third or eastern one-third of the buffer and as close as possible to the lots within the Savona subdivision. Design and plans have been revised to shift the trail to the southern portion of the buffer outlot, except as otherwise required due to grading, drainage, and topography challenges. The trail meanders to provide for a pleasant user experience, avoids the existing wetland, and minimizes impacts on property owners on either side. 6) The sidewalk along "Street A" must continue along this street until its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. Plans have been revised accordingly. 7) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of- way line of Keats Avenue. Sufficient space for a future trail corridor appears to exist within the current county RCS . In our review of the existing site conditions and topography, November 25, 2013 Page 3 we have identified the preferred alignment and,lowest impact route to fall within the ROW when considering the existing berms,ponding slopes, and W landscaping areas that will serve as an adequate buffer for future housing. Westwood 8) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. Plans have been revised accordingly. 9) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of afnal plat and final construction plans. Acknowledged. 10)Sidewalks.shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi family housing portion of the subdivision. Plans have been revised accordingly. 11)The applicant shall be responsible,for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19)right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3, 2013. The required improvements shall include, but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten foot bituminous trail through the median, turn lanes, and other improvements as required by the County. Acknowledged. Final plans will include said improvements. 12)The applicant shall observe all other County requirements as specified in the Washington County review letter dated July 3, 2013. Acknowledged. 13)The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. Acknowledged. r F,6:.I s 1.1 E a i N. 19 7 2 planning>engineering>Surveying November 25, 2013 Page 4 14)The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically, the rearrangement of lots around the "Exception"parcel. Westwood Plans have been revised accordingly. 15)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. Acknowledged. Land dedicated to the City of Lake Elmo for public uses should be maintained by the City of Lake Elmo. A homeowners association will be established to maintain areas that do not fall within a private lot or public land. Homeowners association documents will.be provided with the final plat. 16)The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment int lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the,final plat for recording. Acknowledged. Lennar would like to begin working; with. the City of Lake Elmo on the determination of fair market value. 17)Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. Acknowledged. 18)The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area(either public or private)within the multi family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. Design and plans have been revised to illustrate the proposed elements of the active recreation area within the townhome portion of the project. Additional details will be provided to City staff regarding specifications of proposed furnishings at final design. 19)No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat (155)may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south, ESTABLISHED !IN 1 9 7 2- planning>engineerffiq>suFveying November 25, 2013 Page 5 Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)to the west, or back to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) through the property to the north of Savona. Acknowledged. Westwood 20)A future realignment of Yh Street along the western border of the plat may be considered by the City Council as part of the final plat submission for this are provided the realignment does not result in any significant modifications to the preliminary plat. Acknowledged. 21)The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. Lennar requests the City provide a copy of the grading agreement if only in draft form. If weather permits, Lennar would like to start grading as soon as possible. 22)The preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. We have prepared final stormwater calculations and drawing revisions to address the city and watershed review comments. These are attached for your review. 23)The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate all proposed improvements within the 5rh Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Damon Farber and Associates. Plans have been revised to incorporate improvements (lighting, landscaping) that are generally consistent with the 5"' Street concept prepared by Damon Farber. 24)All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9, 2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: November 25, 2013 Page b a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes W installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of VV-%-twood the High Pressure Gas line, if necessary. b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water ponding. We have been in contact with both BP and Xcel regarding the proposed work to be completed within the easement areas. As final plans are completed, we will continue to coordinate with these utility companies to gain their final approvals.We do not anticipate a formal letter of approval. until the plans are final. The work proposed within the Electrical Transmission easement is apart of the initial phase, so we hope to gain their approval within the next few months.Work within the BP easement would not take place until future phases, so we do not anticipate final plans for this area until. 201.5 or beyond. 25)The City will not accept an application formal plat approval until the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 has been ordered by the City Council. ,the City Council does not order this project, the applicant must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subiect to review and approval by the City Council. The 429 project has been approved. 26)The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi family area, including but not limited to a conditional use permit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street, at the time a final plat is submitted for this area. Acknowledged. 27)The applicant is encouraged to preserve or re-use as many trees as possible that are currently located on the former golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. Acknowleged. 28)The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. Acknowledged. E 5 T A g L I c M =0 1 ! 1 9 7 planning>e°n 9nPe&ER➢q;s6.&rveVin November 25, 2013 Page 7 w Please contact us if you have any questions. Weshvwod Sincerely, WESTWOOD PROFESSIONAL SERVICES W--- %Elt- Cory Meyer & Ryan Blum Sr. Project Managers CC: Joe Jablonski, Lennar Corporation ESTABLISHIUD :N 1972 planning >engineering>surveying FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. MEMORANDUM Cara Geheren,P.E. 651.300.4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264 Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267 Date: February 7, 2014 Chad Isakson,P.E. 651.300.4285 To: Kyle Matt, Planning Director Re: Savona Cc: (Vick Johnson,City Planner Final Plat Review Ryan Stemspksi, P.E.,Assistant City Engineer From: Jack Griffin, P.E.,City Engineer An engineering review has been completed for the Savona development by Lennar Corporation, A Final Plat submittal and Construction Plans were received on January 28, 2014. The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc.: ® Construction Plans for Phase 1 Sanitary Sewer,Watermain, Storm Sewer, and Streets,dated 01,16,2014. ® Construction Plans for Grading, Drainage and Erosion Control, dated 01.16.2014. • Landscape Plan, Phase 1, dated 01.20.2014. ® Stormwater Management Narrative, dated 01.21,2014. o Figure for Stormwater Management Narrative, not dated. STATUS/FINDINGS: The Construction Plans as submitted remain incomplete and are not ready for construction. In addition, several design elements fail to meet city specified requirements and engineering design standards. Many of the comments below represent repeat requests from the previous city review comments. The following comments summarize the major issues that may impact Final Plat documentation and/or easements. 1. The design as proposed relies heavily on the use of the electrical transmission easement areas for Stormwater management and storm sewer piping systems. To date the city has not been provided any documentation indicating permission for this infrastructure to be placed within these areas.The proposed infrastructure will be owned and maintained by the city, therefore the city requires unrestricted ability to own, operate and maintain this infrastructure in perpetuity. No construction activity should be allowed until this issue is fully resolved. 2. The design of Sth Street must be revised to reflect the city standard section, including boulevard layout and dimensions, grading and drainage facilities, appropriate vertical curve profiles, and pavement section details. 3. The plans do not provide sufficient easements for the ongoing operation and maintenance of the proposed infrastructure. Easement widths must be labeled for each pipe and shown on the utility plans. Easement widths must be a minimum of 30 feet for utilities not located on Outiots or within city R/W. Wider easements may be required for deep pipes to meet OSHA excavation requirements. It is the applicant's responsibility to carefully review the plans to ensure all easements as required above have been provided as part of the Final Plat. Plan revisions and/or additional easements must be addressed for at least the following areas: PAGE 1 of 4 ➢ Storm sewer run from CB 159 to STMH 156 (north of Street G). This run is also located in the Electrical Transmission easement area, which requires written permission from the owner. ➢ Storm sewer run from CBMH 106 to STMH 71 encroaches onto Block 5, Lot 11. ➢ Storm sewer run from CBMH 74 to STMH 52 encroaches onto future Townhome locations. ➢ Additional easement is needed around CB 119 and CB 122. 4. The storm sewer system in the rear yards of Block 2 and the extension of Street F and related utilities between Block 1 and Block 2 should be added to Phase 1 construction plans if Block 2 is to be considered part of the Phase 1 Final Plat. The following comments summarize the issues that must be addressed to facilitate additional construction plan review. The city will resume review of construction plans upon receipt of updated plans with a point by point response letter. GENERAL PLAN REQUIREMENTS AND COMMENTS 1. Specifications must be submitted in accordance with the requirements of the city engineering design standards manual. 2. City standard plan notes must be placed on the plan sheets, incorporating the notes as an integral part of the construction plan set. Applicant's plan notes must not contradict city plan notes and/or details. City standard plan notes must be removed from the detail sheets. 3. Remove comment from all plan sheets "Bituminous pavement and concrete sections to be in accordance with the recommendations of the Geotechnical Engineer". 4. The applicant has requested an exception to the city standards to allow for a 6.5% sidewalk grade along Streets E and F. The maximum allowable grade along residential streets is 8%. However, the maximum allowable street grade with a sidewalk is 6.0%. Engineering recommends approval of this exception. 5. No additional design exceptions have been noted and requested in writing by the applicant. Therefore all infrastructure systems will be reviewed and accepted by the city upon meeting city design standards. STREETS AND TRANSPORATION 1. 5th STREET NORTH. ➢ The typical section must be updated to meet the city required cross section previously sent to the applicant. Detailed dimensions must be consistent with the city standard including measurements from face and back of curb, clear zones, reaction zones, and boulevard areas. ➢ The applicant continues to show a 5-foot sidewalk along 5t" Street. All previous communications by the city have requested the sidewalk width to be changed to six feet. ➢ The pavement section must meet a 10 ton design standard. The applicant must call out the design section with the necessary design criteria supporting the specified section. In no instance shall the pavement sections be less than the city standard pavement section. ➢ Plan, profiles and grading plans must be updated to reflect the cross section changes including sidewalk,trail and amenity locations. ➢ Profile alignments must be updated to meet state aid design standards. Vertical sag curves at station 1 and between station 5 and 6 must be increased to a minimum K-value of 64 for 40 mph design. ➢ Revise the stripping and signing plan to be consistent with Phase 1 improvements. ➢ Revise the stripping and signing plan to be consistent with the updated cross section. 2. RESIDENTIAL STREETS ➢ A residential typical section has been added that is not consistent with the city standard. This section must be revised to meet the city standard. Boulevard trees shall be set 5 feet back of curb with or without sidewalks. ➢ Remove proposed yellow centerline pavement markings from Street F. 3. CSAH 17 (Keats Avenue). ➢ Washington County written approval must be submitted for all improvements proposed within the Washington County R/W. PAGE 2 of 4 The divided median cross section should match and align with the cross section for 5th Street to allow for a continuous intersection design. �= Cross section plan sheets must be prepared and incorporated into the plan sets for Keats Avenue improvements and to identify the future trail corridor. LANDSCAPE PLAN 1. The Landscape plans must be amended in accordance with the revised cross sections requested for Sch Street and the typical residential street. 2. City standard plan notes must be added to each landscape plan sheet with the plan notes eliminated from the detail pages. 3. As previously indicated a design-build irrigation system will not be allowed. The landscape irrigation system design must be submitted to the city for review and approval prior to the start of work. SANITARY SEWER, WATER MAIN,STORM SEWER,AND STREETS 1. City standard plan notes for sanitary sewer, water main, storm sewer, and sidewalk and trail must be placed on the plan sheets to be prominently presented to the contractor. Delete notes from detail sheets. 2. Line type remains unclear to identify the improvements associated with Phase 1. Please remove or shade out ALL line types for other Phases not to be constructed with these Plans. Sanitary sewer: 1. Provisions to adjustment the existing sanitary sewer manholes along Sch Street must be provided on Plans. 2. Please identify the need to lower the sewer line from Drop MH 11 to MH 13 on Street G. Also,the profile showing storm sewer crossing at STA 5+00 is not consistent with plan view. Please confirm. Watermain: 1. Street F has more than 20 services isolated between valves. An additional gate valve should be added near STA 16+00, 2. Watermain and appurtenances must be upsized to 12 inches in diameter on Street G from Street F to the north end. Stub to Future Street F must be upsized to 12 inches in diameter. Storm Sewer: 1. Storm sewer design calculations must be submitted to facilitate the city plan review. Provide a complete storm sewer schedule to include pipe capacity and cleansing velocities. 2. Calculations to support sufficient catch basin placement must be provided. 3. Provide written documentation to indicate Washington County approval for proposed modifications and use of OCS—205. 4. Minimum easement widths must be provided as previously identified in this letter. S. Plans must include RIM and inverts for all existing storm sewer infrastructure (see County R/W). 6. The minimum city standard pipe size for storm sewer is 15-inches. Please revise storm sewer from CBMH 166to CBMH 169 accordingly. 7. Culvert from FES 200 to FES 201 must be increased to a minimum size of 15 inches. Additionally, a profile of this culvert must be shown on the Construction Plans. 8. Minimum outfaii pipe slope is 1%.Storm sewer from STMH 51 to FES 50 must be revised accordingly. 9. Storm Sewer from CB 119 to CBMH 118 must cross perpendicular to 5th Street. 10. CBMH 131—include stub extension for future connection. 11. Revise catch basin casting note to sump 0.10 feet at curb line (to be consistent with City Standard Detail). 12. Drain tile stubs should be a minimum of 100 feet in length. PAGE 3 of 4 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL 1. The grading plan should be revised in the area of Outlot G where the drainage Swale in Block 12 is directed to the back property of Lots 1 and 2, Block 2. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT 1. The Stormwater Management Plan narrative and exhibit must be updated to properly identify all ponds and infiltration basins to support the narrative. 2. Written documentation must be provided indicating VBWD permit approval for the Stormwater Management Plan for the entire VBWD drainage area. VBWD documentation must indicate that the conditions of approval have been met. 3. Details must be added to the plans to address the specific restoration and finishes for all infiltration basins and storm water facilities. 4. The storm water facilities have been located in Outlots dedicated to the city for maintenance purposes. All 100-year high water levels (HWL)and HWL overflows must remain within a city Outlot. PAGE 4 of 4 4 January 15, 2014 Joe Jablonski Lennar 16305 36"'Ave North, Suite 600 Plymouth, NIN 55446 Res Savona---Lake Elmo,Minnesota VBVVD Permit#2013-20 Dear Mr.Jablonski: Enclosed is the Valley Branch Watershed District(VBWD)permit for your project. Please note the following conditions imposed by the Managers,which are also listed on.the back of the permit. 1. This permit is for Lots 14-15 of Block 8 and Blocks 9-19, the southeast portion of Outlot A, most of Outlot E,part of Outlot 1, and all of Outlots B, C, G, and H, and the associated roads and storm sewer, as shown on the Sheets 3-6 of the Grading,Drainage&Erosion Control Plan dated 11/25/2013 and as owned by US Home Corporation.Another permit(s) will be required for all other work, including but not limited to the proposed multifamily units. 2. Manholes immediately upstream from treatment basins (e.g., Lots 10/11 of Block 8; Lot 5 of Block 17; Outlot C; CB in Street I upstream.of Outlot I) shall have sumps greater than 3 feet and be equipped with porous baffles(e.g., SAPL baffles)to provide pretreatment and reduce washout/resuspension of sediment. 3. The bioretention basins shall be no deeper than 1.5 feet. The grading plans shall be revised and approved by the VBWD Engineer prior to construction. 4. Prior to construction, details of the proposed outlets from the treatment basins shall be provided and approved by the VBWD Engineer. 5. The low openings of Lots 4-7, Block 8 shall be no lower than El. 996.9. The low openings of Lots 1-2, Block 8 shall be no lower than El. 992.2. Drain tile shall be installed around the perimeter of the foundations of the homes on these lots. 6. This permit is not valid until. a maintenance agreement in the general format of Appendix B of the VBWD Rules is submitted to and approved by the VBWD Attorney. 7. Prior to construction, the required surety shall be submitted to the VBWD. B_DAV'0 11"C"17- K 0 LINCfJLN FETCHER o DALE BORASH ® "LL LUCAS a EDINARD MARCH" N VALLEY BRANCH VVATERSHED DISTRICT R,O.BOX 838 LAKE ELPVIO.f,INNESt7TA 55042-0538 VAg%I.ybAld.org Joe Jablonski,Lennar VBWD Permit 42013-20: Savona—lake Elmo,MN Page 2 8. The VBWD Engineer and Inspector shall be notified at least 3 days prior to commencement of work. 9. Erosion controls shall be installed prior to the commencement of grading operations and must be maintained throughout the construction period until turf is established.Additional erosion controls may be required, as directed by the VBWD Inspector or VBWD Engineer. 10. All disturbed areas shall be vegetated within 14 days of final grading. 11. This permit is not transferable. 12. The required drainage easements and access easements shall be recorded with the Washington County Recorder's Office. 13. This permit is subject to obtaining all other permits required by governmental agencies having jurisdiction (including a NPDES permit). 14. The applicant is responsible for removal of all temporary erosion-control measures, including silt fence,upon establishment of permanent vegetation at the project site as determined by the VBWD Engineer and/or Inspector. 15. The following additional erosion controls shall be implemented on the site: a. All proposed slopes 3 feet horizontal to 1 foot vertical(3H:IV) should be covered with erosion-control blanket. b. Silt fence should follow existing contours as closely as feasible to limit the potential for gully erosion along the edges. c. Additional silt fence may be needed during construction. d. Street sweeping shall be performed if sediment collects on streets. e. A construction sequencing plan shall be submitted, approved, and followed. f. If erosion occurs at the outlets of the storm sewer pipes, the applicant will be responsible for correcting the problem to the satisfaction of the VBWD. g. Any sediment that collects in storm sewers, ponds, or other water management features shall be removed. 16. To prevent soil compaction, the proposed infiltration areas shall be staked off and marked during construction to prevent heavy equipment and traffic from traveling over it. If infiltration facilities are in place during construction activities, sediment and runoff shall be kept away from the facility, using practices such as diversion berms and vegetation around the facility's perimeter. Infiltration facilities shall not be excavated to final grade until the contributing drainage area has been constructed and fully stabilized. The final phase of excavation shall remove all accumulated sediment and be done by light tracked equipment to avoid compaction of the basin floor. To Joe Jablonski,Lennar VBWD Permit#2013-20: Savona—Lake Elmo,MN Page 3 provide a well-aerated, highly porous surface,the soils of the basin floor shall be loosened to a depth of at least 24 inches to a maximum compaction of 85% standard proctor density prior to planting. 17. The Valley Branch Watershed District shall be granted drainage easements, which cover land adjacent to stormwater management facilities, wetlands, and lowlands up to their 1.00-year-flood elevations and which cover all ditches, storm sewers, and.maintenance access to the stormwater management facilities. 1.8. The minimum floor elevations for all buildable lots in the development shall be recorded in a Declaration.of Covenants and Restrictions or on the final plat. 19. Return or allowed expiration of any remaining surety and permit closeout is dependent on the permit holder providing proof that all required documents have been recorded(including but not limited to easements) and providing as-built drawings that show that the project was constructed as approved by the Managers and in conformance with the VBWD rules and regulations. Thank you for your cooperation with the District's permit program. Sincerely, David J.B check,President Valley Branch Watershed District DJB/ymh Enclosure c. Ray Marshall,VBWD Attorney Ray Roemmich,VBWD Inspector Molly Shodeen,MDNR Kyle Klatt,City Planning Director--City of Lake Elmo Jack Griffin, City Engineer,FOCUS Engineering—City of Lake Elmo Building Inspector—City of Lake Elmo Ryan Bluhm,P.E.,Westwood Professional Services—Authorized Agent Nathan Campbell,Corps of Engineers Brad Johnson,MDNR Jed Chesnut,Washington Conservation District Melissa Doperalski,MDNR Dennis Rodaeker,Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources Karen WoId, Barr Engineering Company Yvonne Huffman,Barr Engineering Company P:\Mpls'r23 MN\8212382020\ MovedfromMpls_P\2013\Permit2013W20—Savona\PermitLtr_2013-20_Jan2014.docx VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED€WRECT TQ BE COMPLEMD BY VBWD: 'PERMIT APPLICATION PERMIT NUMBER _�( PERMIT FEE RECEIVED BATE RECEIVED Return application to John Hanson { Barr Engineering Company � Engineers for the Valley Branch Watershed District 4700 West 77�h Street r Edina,MN 55436 4803 I' A permit fee shall accompany this permit;unless waived by the Board of Managers, (Governmental Bodies are not required to pay a fee) Name of Pro ect: 5AtdoV6. Name: Purpose of Project (,4- ,) �, Address: Project Location(street address,if known;otherwise, SA Cg {� major intersection): JLaA / S City,State,zip: City or Township: ! /J Legal Description(proof of ownership required): Phone: 171-2 31D PID: Section: Township: Range: Few, ' Project Tlmaline: Start Date: `) ( 61 Email: 6e Completion Bate: Gd ' Name: &-d i Name: Busine N m :_ a.- Address: Address: t � - Ci€y,State,lip: City,State,Zip: Phon@: - tm 3"� Phone: Eat Fax: Email: a � r Email: Once a Valley Branch ft rshed Via rice permit has been approved,the permit conditions vuill attached to the back of this form, By signing this permit application,the permit applicant,his/her agent,and owner(hereinafter°Permitttee') shalt abide by all the conditions set'by the Valley Branch Watershed District(VBWD). All work whin violates the terms of the permit by reason of-presentlog a serious threat of soli erosion,sedimentation,or an adverse effect upon water quality or quantity,or violating any rule of the VBWD may result In the VBWD Issuing a Stop Work Order which shall Immediately cause the work on the project related to the permh to cease and desist,All work on the project shall cease until the permit conditions are met and approved by the VBWD representatives. In the event Permitte@ contests tM Stop Work Order issued by the VBWD, Perrrlittse shalt attend a VBWD Board of Managers meeting and discuss the project. Any attorney fees, costs,or other expenses Incurred on behalf of the VBWD in enforcing the terms of the permit shall be the sole expense of the pe�rmd applicant. Costs shall be payable from the permit applicant's penttif fee. If said Fees exceed the permit amount,the Permittee shall have ten(10)days from the date of receipt of the invoice from the VBWD to pay for the cost incurred in enforcing the permk by which to gray the VSWD for said costs. If costs are not paid within the ten(10)days,the VBWD will drag on the permit applicant's surety. The Permf tee agrees to be bound by the terms of the final permit and conditions required by the VI3WD for approval of the permit. The permit applicant further acknowledges that he/she has the authority to bind th® owner of the proire rty and/or any entity performing the work on the property pursuant to the tarots of the VSWD permit,and shall be responsible for complying with the terms of the VBWD pe it. Big atures(Required): .✓ Omer Oer tit of`c-rant that Appllcamt)[N n a�f&t�&oP3Re+�Ag4�rt/ ate �. Lt 00 flf FeTCMER c bA1!tg UCN� GIPPSRt.I?.8CNE@4 PAtEaCrdASN 6tAAYL[FCiCaENt3saa slAtLEY@R4te+Cl@VUATEfaStil l)019TRiC7 e r?f),I30;t638 LWElflr4.&Alb3lJE60TA55042tb53& 3� 'aE � _ a <Y a a= t c$ m oFg m 2E Ali m A m 0 Y C a C at ° � �s �_. E;.,•jape a,* Ya•s V8 LE w t" k s � a$s�t$p �$ao�=��' x� o a`•�e 8= €saga it vull � $ 8 ��g^ FyLg •g�5�a :� FqY s 3 � a aF-�g F aBESUL saga;„a $= g€ c � al- � • 3 L� �yE Yk; l SS 8 ��`j a` RRw •-01 4 8 $ Ygc d p gta,tys����3d�$$So�Y �g�`>`t v= �}� bbv q� I Ira bb $ tL 23%WA� uw '14 N ro irgi 2.'r,go.MN all I 1p liz L4 k 0, TV 3t A JW=13W A _ ICA , � . #- � � � � | al �!! d » § j .\ B §r /\, � gill-§�§ 7 | 2 _..-/- SASS }} � < 1�4 }�� - •«-!!!l=� ! � . � e� � it 0 2 � � � 5 � |!| !•| @ 5 �! �! \ g \ S % \ \{ • s a 4�4 ® k § _ o it Z 7 u / `� }/ } � [ _I! ail l INNY, HIM is, \� \ �� !Us. 11ili� 1�1!!I!Fat W NMI. L'!Wsk I 6!�:!� � Lyf..�,: ..nii�����,'i�,[1�l'�\��i�iiill i1i►. ACTIN mm wal ORR it 0 nil oil I� ���1 MIN � ��- .•.. ., � \�I as Mom as OA ae Ld 11 oY'7 ,r t1 ail 28 1 Vj ` ys aql dot ,1J1 uv/u� tro �8 /'wma, aT N < QW G o 1 �1 $ {y 3 g C ; } yl $ OF •4 � 1 � , ,� �.� °t n 1 � �"('� K M 8VIM a[aml lloi 1 - 0100, \� 1 maw. YaQz !! I � J e'.eol I It rot � J 1 gd QgkIl 1 (sue rro 1 A - ' (1 ` `19 , �-_--`I+r __ "•t:_�eo 1�.._____�L_____J�.______J n,, e'TO 1(�% �`�` Q� gg g��g�, i� $ , I t Kt�Oi -� •'ter_ im 1 ��_,_?tuoti _\`+ ///�^ '� I o a •,/ t SEW,a c w, o xrrolrra�ery�0 1 , °i°e �```� / err • •. }1� ssro W. ®(z)a os9104W I aim (i)a '�:lt(x)y cr.ul ` _ r-e-�:'--__ _ �' _'"._"r`.Ji"—.••L:.Y'�h,}��. ♦-fir. ,rFF r" }t amp H �y$t a y�� 5 z, b mpx PRE Om �����o��� a€ ` Wc. f1 �1 ,• t �=W i' L U� Rb � 1 t � � t� m \ t$ < o, I I aces a I osea a t t \�• 8; �i i� 1 f I to I ° t iL etl 1 I J Li i -A 1 Y a wuo ,00e IL a o g t`, to�• , ,orgo ,� \� �� 1 ��• ';�� 'A', ,ern � ' ?+ ` ,�' a� s � � �� t if to , Q c - ..... i ` t • �i y r ` I \# 4• ���� L--� 1 q4 Y Apf G qq 1 1� O oz 01 '• IEs I' 1 a 1 ita� i� t - o q fN ` ,•P �/ � '•1 ,Y ��\\ a •• � �2 I O•F � y t •jam d � `,� •:— °�g, /- ,'� `:.�.� �� 4 It { d°U Igo e ; HERE l Oh ! .e \1 '� l yse op ,r`6 � � cz g - ~�i.sa•T•� !f� � � t at %11 • y gag§ 7I � � g � y__ 8 R d ao wo bB 1HIIIIIIe�ke'gge EN En to Ch yr 1 P. Y y �a / 1 / \\ / •W ����f`. 1,� ..I ■ z 888 1 I t r � ,` ♦ ar c i � 4 1i 1t 1,a r ♦ r I � q$p{ 3 ->� 4^O♦r P�>� � ir��1 I� �I a qqz.) � 1 � I� I 8 N d e — • r� '�L�e °aae a •te6 a� �eee a i� e�00e9 oeoo a a°� ,` ` ` v g K� Jt •..- pr <, t L)j rro0c Y I' iNe n urea n r °sce'tl , `• 8 j 3 '�! Y es h i c i 00 'al I A"RIM- I14W Vill i.51! T; 1. co 5 fill It, t ju ov it ell-a 411r, ell I R + Ski? t --- - 13�- -- { t }, Y: Ili w._......:...,.�...v... Y iFi S'� —71 -;-t F eat I o� Y Wo >A a � : ��� � �b • �� � 6 ju, gg ¢ a ui t - 1 a^ 88 ale d g 5g D• ykD::D'e r p� O• I§j¢i¢ 1E eeC ¢ pp _ g i D � 1 ,r ui a '` 1 s S i �f� Oat c • s B R f, 1 1 tl 1 1 I rr x / iyf 1 _ / I l 1 } i � 1 I r - fYl 1 rr^^ 1 V •/ I II gilt 1} 7A t 1 i 4 �0� - 1!iAf�oa;7 • % � �1�4 sne a, .:gym•MAN / '`�'��fjjl::.,. t , � w t R 1(h�iy1/ N E, i • I I Af I'll Will 1_g ga Wig L WWW � ayiLl 1 W sI r .411 5^ '; / v o i Y -_ SY gg r tea= a mvamyo N sss i $ fifi666� fifi �assa ss fib3� 5fifit s2f2 ss t t r u,5 8 8�cS� 'S tttfi� fi5665 sE .111 N N N N Y Y O V � vs wadr. Y a NON 41 o cz 4 r^ d v 4 i 6 e ,I-r 'g 8 S is� F +�s' y _ � '3� i• b i�, r g 5 ® ' Ai r' 1 i gel it a 13` a 6. g i p � 3 f 1S #� ;,868a_-- -"-_•_R�F;„_ a! iR� YRg ---�5�.9.5 _ ..� -^�� "' � 3 � 8 C r---------------------------_ _• AEI 1113 7A tt 177M� �� , "�J iL it Zt e li p - �• Zt k �• �'� h dI is � �� h •� �� Al tt Jib � �.�. �� in � ,r•' i it � � •�' ,��`.� 8 _ � i7 8l i 11 ' •' �" tr it i� 11 ` '' I+ a S b sr bw 4. 113 o , I _ � 1 I r ' „ ; 1 r ao t ffd 33 { i4! �i!far s f ' in v� s v gg sqq g$b $ lay € �� �e @ X, R-E g Vi G ^ ■■ �i brim At g• of US � [� S uu __ / _�•r �O bR �iNYWW rye `� � ' \\ � � r • N m a Es 00 to 21 � r 3«add Ss p IS 013 31 Q4 J Y 7 �MW ,riT- � 22 t ! •• I� ^fig g,' �.� I AN, 59 �1 •o`\` `v'i CFO i i / mvS&a •:F' /% r1 h r ad 11 � d• R•- � by �,' , 10 g N Ni. iB" a•qq =9 ,� a 7E v o & $ $ a s Val $ a u o gyp_ �=rs O ���-; - �'-•- jtN > �j sseio6 i�� le '� � O �� �� ��- r A.�� �pR a 1 a,— ` i IN e� `I------_—_-_ II _'_ r mSW.oi g I I I WSW Xt e , op wwww g 1 ei{r � ••` - t �� �3�Fc lyse. All ��''''�� MA Y / tl, Ax ``t `'1'�O�' ^` bad � '`� •�N�b i� Ca A h;;, P-3: o � I k NINE 11 mg M N �� � `� k � g OD DD.0 VIS I'd " u§� ptpp lam" 1 ,"nE°cWW r. y W 6i y mcgo xsdpy �� `.a3v :l.d 6 K zj•�� as $$88 ,r— rye 35 r � AEL !'� • e 1 " 1� `° � � �� F '�`"~" ^ Ham` ~ p / v t nose E�ttr .40e 113 nvwww 10.$-Yid ..an s m SQ�i• �`� � � � R �•7• yxf Sg oo ez.°..va � tlFId�Y ,' L 11,1 � - ' I! oas 1 v v ao u° flp lie d 1 e `,I 1t tL s >t Lti_y_ ' SS��lY 3d 49 '8�r� a Sti f_..__---__ r J it IT '+ate Im. ae 1 '=ems "��• � � •9: ti t lb t9 r Wun3 R&�• xd s= Oa sas �s9 a� P — O I m m gx e OM g gQ � N^ a o ppt 21 iql 9 ba g�3 �7t I t5 -6 R +d 9s46e -aU Ad 8 0. W-8 yd a uewzc rit we / „ 511119 wsw My" N O' ,^\`♦\ w y� I`i • I sr"S�a^Y, Rd r Y� _..& w Fl 11 � ec+sY 4 3 slit ebt gxv cry; f edge„9dx$ G � ♦ ♦,� 0, /o R\i\\'\ ���'p,p\ Y �Vd rerse �� i 1 �F�s^ N Al Y - m VII- o ate+ sa d �Ra En , '�♦ �%��%'�\\\\\ SC LL6 q�t / /' `♦V n �4 C/'3,�a� � � - /J Low. \♦ bye , ' `J�\ �C. cz'Le Y j aawww- 28' eceee $d `---- 1 z g3 ----':� DI ^X8 Ot g b 3w �e a &L� A Y \♦♦,ti` a C 6rYtN " _ 11 It ♦ /' D 1 I S$ �7f� l A �`♦ �`♦� '�' I 1 79d � � ' /�'N ,w �m e1�'o � dTd i75 Wca Y L C oova W'00+1-Yl5 Nd 1+ � i'aa =kR 1 / A%_ Shy x 1 1 �_-_-_- -- 'r•• 1 1 N � O] eF qgp K RV v wBGB � la;WW 1 & n C._ -20. I yy ! a r—_ oowe i R� + • J It � !+ �` "` Sam Fb• �� LInE'WW b `��C Dj 6C�ild;w to DoM .89 1! woi.a-sle � YeVWW sC l_ y 1 (j I+ as ee lee ; tl o -h Ir' F IN. aW 'fin i 1 jll Is mot + a cee -n313 na 1 � � y :A 1 pin� n, H ul fl 0 0 \\ IA w w wile (� W «b, �+ Ncn itCv�e 1 n _ Y8&s seas-•70 'yl 09-$��y rosc.z-ind c,We is A3V c, aroc:;+1-rrs Md kp �E �1 1 � s F R �xo � F R zZpg y Tg?j K p S� �r Jaef 8 1 @ a ((IQ) `�ldC"= $d U am i -44 • �,1� QB�g n•— J''r��, ax od a i 6 lah i Iml I: ;' � ' RPlsiaq ♦ � _v I I N �� �mG 1 t Ifye� 'd I� ��Yu IL :� fJ JJJ— i;6 IE R D!e Y i 11 ii� a e R S ? � be 8 d 14 Rgi - amo py i,M mq «:Y O gSStR h J > � C NR W STH SSREET pkno < ' ^ G 3 V:e � � «d y t�d e= ply� a q ` Y � � �4� d ------------ -------------- - _ - I m r Roy„ SYWJ-" 'I f I� t g SiN Y G k g5g c: She � 2N �e oe o ---4----- cl tan 13 L r �..o e r Ctie 66 I � tl f� r gig j Ohl 's ,I 89 Klz 11 ' • c 1 ll IF a T ; yd ua,a vs o 1 H1N0N 1338iS H1S + I rj + �� � oe SS" ]• �x!,Fa# ♦]l+ Ll as nS 99 all s f Ic 10 ID,4 j IR !is rT7 o g , I ;j.! 0 j tiRliI I,'P i jnEl J�e—1 Im Ila ;Mi- OR gag WIN1 u 10� ------------ "I Z. 0 T7 L -i s-A list Li 1q; oo ,i is 1111 ll1. ii ii a eli! i:�iE;4R a k i SS 2 cr it i 7 iq r ;f a i r °t ga ; f _ 8 +• �y IL ',sei Ir pen,.,ft G it 1 S� a '°r '1��.¢ �!u e `ii�i #f 7}rh k k Ef ft' i, 5 €10�i fl�dE S�er e �i ?1!i`.�Y Cd ! ", � i� �try. obt, H;lI rli�,�yr ;, Cn it it 5 Lit �•!% � �I •S! si� s yq� ! �C rfk l :r i �k ii�� - L-- §s Mj lit 2 s 5 1 1 Y ..c=-`:�..' .; �, �p�I �, I S'�,� '•, � $g ` 1 r� 4�yy I i iSj= d 1, 1 •' � 0 � Y. t i � •� �b � s h i b u tlD o RC air 14 L- J gi ESE U I vi IL W L R 9F,.& p5d ply I Hgni i - a r w 1 I I ' jig ti, I ISO I I Iy ep I it e��i 11 — I i 1 ^❑ tt � � Pal 1 ;1:41 U j A Y a}akA o E���e' � ' gaffe � X21ea �! - �l•y 1►?��� it ��`S7 `►�y�� .1a" f\+� Fly �� �. y, �li*r-i�• •. �,{ter• `f dies. !�►2 . :e5 - J e� - ��:. 6 ��. �� 4 - a ��' ' °�g'Q`� `�o p�p�� �I 1.�r�1 � �I �v�iL_eau. i an, ��� h1�I(j�C �41Sr �ll� �1R�G i' �RI� • �iLvr I "inA ri`� �� _ ���� � ,, � - ne�I rrf; r► .. i' � •� 'Q'• _ � t r � W j ���R:�`I� � 4 '��n�^ a� - `�,`. ,� 6 r i � 0 C111U�\!r.j:i1p0 a��'�ioey;. �;�•� LL j\ �t� �. ��7<A �\�� r uU'�i ���r�1r���fy_ �/� r� 4 � eJo .Op>�.. lei �Q��.v: �� i.0,0'�%!, `14�! y, ��„�roe�' �,�`r�doo. dq� u��o �l�w.aq� �'� �VN�Q� �1�'���'�`���h�� do r i z - - a -71- rr z Cd 419 lega O r------------------ v 1 r------------ i ; a 31 \\ •J .�i Ji _ L / w,</ \ \ u \ �� �`4•`�\ m `� � is l— ah a a _ ar sst r a: s Qe ��s , a• IN! a M. sa$ a $s sa Q Y U"J fill 1 a i 14 NX r ` 3 A1.11 $€ #p�� S0n,�IY i a R i � ab o � S � � fi Y 1 y 11i d y$g 11� ♦I► � i i o� J (�pp Y t 8 . — j!!14, l I i s F y s� i °' t�, ,g � a o j � 8•� d a.t5 cis rf -_! �w..F,. . _=y �•�' i:'3;{:s 1 �:� r.�Via' f•'i�:.it1: IRV-, ipIt 1..r I 104 tit I 'Ciro �^."i'�.-'i l,1'-' �i'.: � � 1 i r ,•,i J �+'u/Zell %��'rf,li�ix(,•'!//, '' ill' rt�� _ � y.+c-'J t�' 1 i x YXW Li i / f :i 1 / f t �• A. ., ,.P., �_•�� , e ;/, --�%: fir...-�"', :- �' ;j:=��(_.'�.xr�?+i ' ' ,-• � 3l� R