Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCCP 09-16-14 Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services in a Fiscally Rnsponsibi 'I'1 IF CITY OF Manner While Preserving the City,Open Space Characte 1 AKE ELMO NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, September 16,2014 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo 1 3800 Laverne Avenue North AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call D. Order of Business E. Approval of Agenda F. Accept Minutes 1. Accept September 2,2014 City Council Meeting Minutes G. Council Reports • Mayor • Council H. Presentations/Public Comments/Inquiries • 36d'&371'Street Improvements I. Proclamation 2. Constitution Week 3. Volksmarch J. Finance Consent Agenda 4. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 5. Accept Financial Report dated August 31,2014 6. Accept Building Report dated August 31,2014 7. Accept City Assessor Report dated August 31,2014 8. Pumphouse No.4 Improvements—Pay Request No.4 9. Lake Elmo Avenue Watermain Improvements—Pay Request No.2 10.2014 Street Improvements—Pay Request No.2 11. Well No.4 Connecting Watermain Improvements—Call for Final Assessment Hearing;Resolution No.2014-68 12.Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements—Call for Final Assessment Hearing;Resolution No.2014-69 13.Special Assessment Abatement Request—MN DNR Land;Resolution No.2014-70 K. Other Consent Agenda 14.Authorize John Schiltz to dispense Beer and Wine Coolers at the Volksmarch Event on October 11,2014 L. Regular Agenda 15. Gateway Corridor LPA Resolution;Resolution No.2014-71 16.Inwood PUD Concept Plan;Resolution No.2014-72 17.Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan; Resolution No.2014-73 18.Village Park Preserve Preliminary Plat;Resolution No.2014-74 19.Hunters Crossing Final Plat;Resolution No.2014-75 20.Savona 2nd Addition Final Plat; Resolution No.2014-76 21.Savona 2°d Addition Developers Agreement;Resolution No.2014-77 22.Wildflower at Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan Amendment; Resolution No.2014-46 23.39d'Street North:Street and Sanitary Sewer Improvements—Change Order No. 1 24.Discover Crossing Repairs—TA Schifsky quote—21.9K M. Staff Reports and Announcements • City Administrator • City Attorney • Planning Director • City Engineer • Finance Director • City Clerk N. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19,2014 CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES SEPTEMBER 2,2014 Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7.•00 pm. PRESENT: Mayor Mike Pearson and Council Members Wally Nelson, Justin Bloyer, and Mike Reeves Absent: Council Member Anne Smith Staff present: City Administrator Zuleger, City Attorney Snyder, Community Development Director Klatt, Finance Director Bendel,and City Clerk Bell. PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item 10 was postponed. MOTION. Council Member Reeves moved TO APPROVE THE AUGUST 19, 2014 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-a ITEM 1:ACCEPT MINUTES THE AUGUST 19, 2014 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY CONSENSUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor Pearson: attended Human Resources Committee Meeting,EDA Meeting Council Member Bloyer: attended library board meeting Council Member Reeves: attended Human .Resources Committee Meeting. The group worked on performance reviews and salary pool. Council Member Nelson: no report PUBLIC COMMENTS/INQUIRIES Paul Ryberg introduced Nate Deprey the new library director. Mr. Deprey expressed he is looking forward to working with the Council and the City. STATUS OF 100%DEVELOPER INFRASTRUCTURE INVESTMENT POLICY City Administrator Zuleger provided status presentation of the developer paid infrastructure. The policy of "growth pays for growth"was implemented in 2013.This has resulted in two positive bond ratings,including an increase from S&P. Council Member Reeves asked what the reaction has been from the developers. National and regional builders have understood the policy. Many have appreciated the discipline. There have been some who are not willing to come to Lake Elmo. Mayor Pearson recognized that the policy and staffs efforts are doing as much as possible to minimize the risk to the City. ITEM 2: PROCLAMATION COMMUNITY MEDIA WEEK Mayor Pearson read the proclamation recognizing the week of September 15th 2014 as Community Media Week. FINANCE CONSENT AGENDA 3. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 4. Approving the TNT Public Hearing Date for the 2015 Budget and Tax Levy;Resolution No.2014-69 MOTION. Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE THE FINANCE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED.Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTIONPASSED 4-0. OTHER CONSENT AGENDA Council Member Bloyer pulled Item 8 for discussion. Page 1 of 4 i LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19, 2014 5. Encroachment Agreement—1668 Ivy Ave N 6. Encroachment Agreement—1650 Ivy Ave N 7. Encroachment Agreement—10938 57d,Street N 8. MOTION. Council Member Reeves moved TO APPROVE THE OTHER CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 8: LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT—MARGO SIELENI It was explained that Mayor Pearson appointed Ms. Sieleni during his report last meeting, but Clerk Bell prefers to have a formal vote with background documentation included for record purposes. Council Member Bloyer thanked Ms. Sieleni for volunteering to serve. MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPOINT MARGO SIELENI TO THE LAKE ELMO LIBRARYBOARD. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 9: SAVONA SUBDIVISION CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT;RES. NO.2014-66 Community Development Director Klatt provided summary explaining the reason for the CUP application. Townhome units on a private street require a CUP, which the part of the next phase of Savona will include. The requirement is to make sure that the City's needs are met in regards to the private street. The area that is involved was explained. MOTION: Council Member Reeves moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2014-66, APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF SINGLE FAMIL Y A TTA CHED DWELLINGS WITHIN THE SAVONA SUBDIVISION THAT DO NOT HAVE FRONTAGE ON A PUBLIC STREET. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 11: APPROVE PROPOSED GENERAL LEVY AND PROPOSED 2015 BUDGET; RES. NO.2014-67 Finance Director Bendel presented the proposed 2015 budget. Council Member Bloyer left at 7.•30 pm. The general fund budget was explained. It was noted that the street maintenance expenses were now a permanent line item in budget. Ms. Bendel explained that the tax levy is staying level and the rate is actually decreasing. Ms. Bendel summarized the library fund. The end year cash reserves were explained. Council Member Bloyer returned at 7.•34 pm. Council Member Reeves asked about part-time staffing at library for 2014. There was none in 2014, but it is budgeted in 2015. Mayor Pearson asked about Sanctuary neighborhood road. City Administrator Zuleger explained the steps that the City has taken. The road needs to be approved by MnDOT. It is believed that the developer funds are available to pay for some of it. Ms. Bendel read letter from Roger Johnson requesting city contribution of minimum of $20k for invasive species management on Olson/Demontreville Lakes. Council Member Bloyer noted that the previous June Page 2 of 4 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19, 2014 request was only $25K. He would be in favor of city contributing 1/3 if all the lakes were evenly supported. He would like to have place holder in budget. Mr. Bloyer noted that recent letter from DNR found no natural erosion occur this past spring. Mr. Reeves believes the City should be engaged in treating the lakes, but he supports addressing all the lakes. He also wants to know more info about the VBWD study.The outflow of the water was discussed. It was noted that O/D levels are anticipated to increase. VBWD does not believe that increasing the outflow can be achieved. Mr. Zuleger explained the VBV D study. The consensus is to have a placeholder, but wait to hear study findings. Mr. Zuleger suggested that the Council commit funds from the storm water fund as the lake is a repository for storm water. Mr. Nelson wants to know if the watershed cities causing impact can be approached for contribution. Mr. Zuleger said the City can ask the DNR. Mr. Reeves asked if signage was sufficient. Mr. Zuleger said it was. It was noted that too much signage can cause confusion. It was explained that the City has not participated in the past. The Council discussed what the appropriate funding level and appropriate parties to pay. Council direction is that the lake property owners need to propose a plan where the City can collaborate. The consequences of using storm water funds were discussed. Future storm water expenses and needs are ahead for the Village drainage.The Council wants to make sure that the expenses are effective and the results are measurable. Ms. Bendel summarized the proposed debt service fund levy. MOTION. Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE GENERAL FUND LEVY OF $2,421,588.00. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. The council acknowledged the tight budget that staff developed and the introduction of zero-based budgeting. MOTION PASSED 4-0. MOTION.•Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE DEBT SERVICE LEVY OF$484,814.00. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. MOTIONPASSED 4-0. The Council discussed how the library has done a good job of being frugal. Even with the 10% statutory reduction, the library levy is still more than the requested budget. A 10% percent reduction results in a $231,261.00. This is actually a 20%increase over the 2014 budget. MOTION. Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE LIBRARY FUND BUDGET AND LEVY AT AMOUNT OF$231,261.00. Council MemberNelson seconded the motion. MOTIONPASSED 4-0. Mr. Zuleger clarified the resulting levy components — General Fund Levy: $2,421,588.00; G.O. Debt Levy: $484,814.00;Library Levy: $231,261.00; total levy: $3,137,663.00. MOTION. Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2014-67 ADOPTING THE PRELIMINARY 2015 GENERAL FUND AND LIBRARY FUND ANNUAL BUDGET'S AND LEVIES. Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 12: DISCUSSION ITEM: COUNCIUSTAFF INTERACTIONS Mayor Pearson explained the reason for this item. Concerns about interactions with Council Member Smith have been brought to the Council's attention. Mayor Pearson noted that conversations were had and commitments to improve were made, but the incidents complained about allegedly have continued. The immediate concerns are exposing the City to potential legal liability and the non-recognition of staff chain of command. The Mayor asked Council for their suggestions. Page 3 of 4 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES AUGUST 19, 2014 It was noted that the discussion needs to be in an open meeting despite the desire to have it in private. The council wants there to be improvement. There have been demands for correction in the past, but there needs to be more improvement. There is concern about potential liability to the City. The Council also wants staff to have a healthy, productive, and safe work environment. The recent adoption of the civility initiative needs to be carried out, especially by council members.The Council wants things to be better. MOTION. Mayor Pearson moved "WHEN COUNCIL MEMBER SMITH WISHES TO CONTACT A CITY STAFF MEMBER, SHE IS TO ARRANGE FOR ANOTHER COUNCIL MEMBER TO BE IN ATTENDANCE. STAFF IS DIRECTED TO CONFORM TO THIS PARAMETER AS WELL."Council Member Reeves seconded the motion. The Mayor hopes that this action improves the situation as everyone desires and they would not have to address this any further. The Council discussed the logistics and the effectiveness of proposed motion. The consensus was the City has an obligation to do something. Whether to include phone calls and adding a timeframe on the restriction were considered,but the original motion was not modified. MOTIONPASSED 4-0. STAFF REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS City Administrator Zuleger: Staff is working on completing several final plats; Planning Commission will be touring a Hans Hagen development in Blaine;working on 2015 CIP budget. Goal is to have workshop in late September;meeting with Washington County Sheriff Hutton next week;Working with Gateway Corridor group involving a Bus Rapid Transit route through Lake Elmo; EDA will be submitting the Planning Commission a resolution for an EDA zoning area. City Attorney Snyder: handling routine matters with staff, reviewed lease for new city administrative space at 3880 Laverne. Community Development Director Klatt: Planning Commission is busy reviewing development applications. City Clerk Bell: reported that Lake Elmo Precinct 1 was randomly selected by the County Canvass Board for review. The precinct passed with no issues. Clerk Bell also announced that additional election judges are being sought for the general election. Finance Director Bendel:working on August financials,certification of levy,and storm water assessments. Mayor Pearson adjourned meeting at 8.34 pm. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Mike Pearson,Mayor Adam R.Bell,City Clerk Page 4 of 4 September 9, 2014 Mayor Mike Pearson & City Council Members City of Lake Elmo 3600 Laverne Avenue Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Dear Mayor Pearson and City Council Members, As the date nears for the completion and vote by the city council on the Feasibility Report for the 361h/37`h Street Project, we would like to reiterate our position and ask that this letter be filed with our Petition dated July 1, 2014. We respectfully request that the city council vote against any type of road for our neighborhood. We do not feel at this time that we need new roads. We live in the rural section of town. It is not necessary structurally or financially to upgrade our roads to the level proposed to the residents on May 15, 2014. There have been discussions at the financial committee meetings about possibly putting the project off until 2017, due in part to the large amount of development coming to Lake Elmo. If a date of 2017 is chosen, at that time we would like to again be notified before any decisions are made, so that we may be a part of the discussion. In 2017, if all parties agree the streets need improvement, at that time we would request: There be NO: * 4"water mains upgraded to 8" * curbs and gutters * a pavement subdrain system * roads widened to 12' We oppose paying additional funds for unnecessary items at the cost of the residents and city, regardless of what year the roads are done. The two roads we have been using have provided us sufficient service for 45 years. A similar road would provide the same service, whenever the city makes the decision to redo the roads. In the meantime, we do request that the city patch and/or repair the west end of 361h Street and as needed in the future to both streets,just as any other road in the city would be repaired. Thank you very much for your consideration. Sincerely, Residents 361h & 37`h Street Lake Elmo, MN 55042 CITY OF LAKE ELMO CONSTITUTION WEEK PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: our Founding Fathers, in order to secure the blessings of liberty for themselves and their posterity, did ordain and establish a Constitution for the United States; and, WHEREAS: it is important that all citizens fully understand the provisions and principles contained in the Constitution in order to effectively support, preserve, and defend against all enemies; and, WHEREAS: September 17, 2014, marks the two hundred twenty-seventh anniversary of the drafting of the Constitution of the United States of America by the Constitutional Convention; and, WHEREAS: it is fitting and proper to accord official recognition of this magnificent document and its memorable anniversary; and, WHEREAS: the independence guaranteed to American citizens, whether by birth or naturalization, should be celebrated during Constitution Week, September 17 through 23, 2014, as designated by proclamation of the President of the United States of America in accordance with Public Law 915; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mike Pearson, Mayor of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim Wednesday, September 17`h through Tuesday, September 23`d, 2014 as Constitution Week. SIGNED THIS SIXTEENTH DAY OFSEPTEMBER, TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN. BY: Mike Pearson Mayor CITY OF LAKE ELMO VOLKSMARCH PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The City recognizes the value and benefits to a healthy park system and recreational opportunities in our community WHEREAS: The City wishes to express appreciation for the commitment and dedication to the local service organizations, volunteers, and businesses who have contributed time and resources to make the City of Lake Elmo a better place to live and work, WHEREAS: The City also celebrates"Community" by bringing families, friends, and neighbors together to enjoy many festivities, NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that I, Mike Pearson, Mayor of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim Saturday, October 11, 2014 the first annual Lake Elmo Volksmarch to distinguish Lake Elmo from surrounding cities, and to uphold the City's commitment to community and observance of open space. SIGNED THIS SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN BY: Mike Pearson Mayor THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM# 4 AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the amount of$1,314,950.07 SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director THROUGH: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.............................................................. City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ............................................................... Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Finance FISCAL IMPACT: $1,314,950.07 SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of$1,314,950.07. No specific motion is needed as this is recommended to be part of the Consent Agenda. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: NA --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 4] September 16,2014 BACKGROUND INFORMATION/STAFF REPORT: The City of Lake Elmo has the fiduciary responsibility to conduct normal business operations. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # Amount Description ACH $ 10,824.99 Payroll Taxes to IRS & MN Dept of Revenue 9/4/14 ACH $ 5,636.87 Payroll Retirement to PERA 9/4/14 DD5758-DD5787 $ 28,199.00 Payroll Dated (Direct Deposits) 9/4/14 41796 $ 623.36 Payroll (Check) 9/4/14 41797-41873 $ 1,269,161.44 Accounts Payable 9/16/14 2478-2485 $ 480.00 Library Card Reimbursement 9/16/14 TOTAL $ 1,314,950.07 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda the aforementioned disbursements in the amount of $1,314,950.07. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Accounts Payable—check registers --page 2-- y Nallo a oa a m - a, a -- - a `" � '9C y ti ao, Rao. � � on°Oir" w �- o� o � — awn °7 p -3 LALA 4 -4 o ff = 4h. � a6 =00 �j N N � n 00 in in z o < �o a N N o W �" O d O N N 9 O O w c o z o y o x o 0 00 CD a A ? a Y o N 0 0 0 0 N c w o � 0 0 o c� m .a a 0 1-d 0 0 o a o < o co 0 o n oT o oco > o � y oo cryd � 00 ^ oa � � QCD to 00 owo 'ph� n �n x co :r C7 N Cl N a p G N ^ N f9 ^O Q• co N N a N a r..i o� < 000 oa y o � o w - _oy' orn o' oo � l o Sa o' x m m o w w, w CD v Q1 W CD LA m m U c o as _ o 00 D _� a CD CD � ro U U LLA W "D U OO ti O O O O O O O ! b 0 r r. N N N O O_ _O O �_ 00 O v 00 07 m F G ^ 0 O po O n O.. W Q w N `CD o a 'rQ- a. 0 s ^ o v f fJ C O O O O O O n O v7 A "d C r J •+ ryCD O O P O 0 O O a, IQ ONN ON ON .A � a NON NONNO\ .... O O ` 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O W d N O N O C O O C C i a _ rn A a a A e wM wI. AN � A px o .o om U LA cn S. cn AON o •a o 0 0 0 th 00 00 00 o A D O o -4 ap Lh 00 LA 00 A 00 o 00 %0 o A o o n o - o � A CO �O 'z Q\ �O �O �O =- oo \O oo in iA iA oo O A O a W W — W "" LA W W W' W T: W W W N N IJ ..d ..- ... — _ O O WO O O O O WO O N U U U U O O O d O O d *O O O Cl lD O O O r m00 � � r � r � 'e .y. ' 'i7 W N N O O O 000 On m O ^ N O W 0 A, oc 00 oo• aaro' OW O0 -' N = a CD O�\�c^Ctt ONo�C OoN�6 O o foo Ny o acoR � T :3 ,. A =. Afl — tA AnAnA ON W N N N CD in Z W 0q IQ M N W 7... 00 O O O cD U o 00 0' 00 F' 9' o' cr n v, CD 5En rn ' O r. ... -. �o ? 0° g m cD CD cD co w ? w o 0 0 W O• C O u, (n m m O O. G �. O O. o p Oy J7 00 H �. ?=CD d, Dn CD y � m y d m m 03 m to CD CD co A � y (.n ao 00 O0 LA O c v r U" W �D ON O O O O 00 00 � � N N J v ' C N ON ON 91 N N W O W A \0 00 90 W W O U 00 d U J Q, J W j tJ N W W 0000 CD 00 T `-' O CoO 0 0 LA N U 00 �D O O A U U ? ,A N ON ON C AD C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ON 0� C% N IJ N N N N N N N N N N d IQ A •P A A A A A A A •P A � � W 7 7 3 CD co c w w W w En N (Dn. Kam+ i Iv N `O Cn y O fD (D VL fD ^' 0 rr 0 T c _ °o O• O N N (CD uj a a a a ac o 00 00 000 7 �' co N R° O_ O_ O_ O_ 'A A CCD N ? A •P A T � Oq -e y GA A O z z z z z z z z z z z z n O O O O O O O O O O O O G y PD r O O C O O O O O O O O O O O C O C C O O O O O C 0 O O O O O O O O � i 0 — 0 — 0 — o� O 51 '� O O� O O O O � .. ... 7 �O O\ �D Q\ O to ON? .ja A � � N � N � NN •� N � N p 00 O O O p n O O O O O O O V, 0 0 �j O O0 O 00 .0. V\ fn w N toC17 N N N CA �O 00 00 a0 r N N -1 -! -4 N A O O Cl .A A N N O O O ^6 O (") O V, O O O O u, O O CC O O O 07 O O O O O O O O .P C7 ? A .� o• A ? A A ? A CD w .w. 7 N CD O ClO O O CD J �, p• p� a, ch 9 titW w w w w w w o CD@ CD 0 0 ° o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 n o o CND N � a °� � og O � 03 C [^ ` m Q tn °O Crl °�—°—° m °�° rn °° m °�-°—° m °�-° C17 °�—°—° C N'b N .O-, n 0�'0 TJ CO o O ►j 00 �° UQ Qq. �O 04 OQ tiq OQ d cn • O N O N �' N D w a' N d Q p' N = N O N �' N p' N O_ ^� O_ m O_ n O_ N O_ N O_ n O 0 O_ cp O_ �p O_ �p O .� m fD o a T ❑ [^ z o m o co co -- o co co o co o co -- ro .per a •r1 Ar. — O. A — �. A �. — �. +� 7. A — a. •p — .. A coo ° to \0ao pogo w %0a°o o°o moo �w W°q ,q C+ cn w cn cov� r� CDto o En° a` o w co p co to 00 co co Wm •• ° �• ° n ° f�D CAD ° N fOD ° CD ° cct cc w 01 y^ m �' m m y v. m y CA rn D .. CA 7 U V, �^ �o O\ N �O °° 3 LA O W W W � 00 0000 W W � o O obi N N 0, �o p o� W 0 0 O O O °s Vl CD N N �o v O -1 00 0o v Vt p ut 0 0 O O O O O O O O p 0 4 oN O O O � ut � O p- O LA 0 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O\ C7, as _O r f9 p 0 d 04 OQ w A A .A w W � T� 7�' (] �• N m fD C K 7 C C O r'p W W CD G Cn N O \O O o ^a o D' G G Y G C7 ? � m m O. Uq CA ro oo CD � 0 o � c _ w o+ � •P O y � f�D " n C d c � I y ro b O z z z z z z z z z z z z z n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p h ro b O w O O O O C O O O O O O O O UQ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a c o 0 0 0 0 0 o c 0 0 0 w o 0 0 0 0 0 c o 0 0 0 0 0 i if ? A A A A AA JL A A 4�, A A A A A A W W W W IO -- -• 1.l1 N l!i N N N N N N rj O N O N C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD Q w W �O W w•O m - VI N - t.) N IJ N N N N CD - - V1 W A W W W A W IJ N N N N 'N N O O N O N N N N N N O O �..� O O O O O O CD O O O O O O O 'O O G 'L A 0) - A AL •P L A A A L •P A JL A ,9 N N N _ " OO A W N A A W A ? A OAA wJA A N W ww O w w -� w w O OIn O OO OW O O a O CD O O O CD O O WJ O O O O O O O O O O O O O O CD O O CD O O O .�. O� O\ ^-3 00 DD Oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0o eo 00 00 00 m U m N a a 0 3 N 7a N d N N N IJ N N N d N N 3 N N N N N N W p W C 07 y' N �' N N y' N a t y' N N �' N y' N N N y' N IV.p N N N N N � N � N O N X' N <1 N'iy N � 1, N � N Q N � N y N � r.) N O N y O O 9 _O .- _O Oa. o - O - OSO O O Od O_ �O lh 3 '9 R° O - R° R R0 m ` fD - fD Ip -\- ci> > A � A � a A � A � A � A A A � AO A � A � A � ? � AAA A � An 41 A R c O s b o C CD o c w w W W c c e w c CA O y (a o WO N. C• C• m O. tau- W d 00 04 00 N N _ _ LA 00 W 00 N N t) O to O w ON N J OW OW O O+ Vl ✓ m A t/i W 0` O W O O N th O w V ul N tJ -• A ON 00 ,•„ to O, Cn O In %O O O O A O O �r C m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O K O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O �C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O b ON (71 ON O\ ON ON 01 cr� ON ON Q\ m ON 0, O\ T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O_ _O _O O_ A da A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A A ~n w < C7 C < a r o x ay oo < CD °= m nra R @En CD CD CD co d A n A r3 Gn fD b yy ^co O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0z e9 "0 r O O O O O O O C' O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 O O O 0 O 0 O O N O n � Ooo,°Om —} b %0 �oN � A � A � ;-o a O �. O C tD .-. � ,�. � NN° _'. N° :r N° V� 4D �p00 .r N m IAAIAA � �p A A ._ W .� A — M ,p 0 A — O �D N OW LA O N O N O N O N C O — a O A 3 C O r G W N W N w N W N w N n W N w A w W '03 `J N N _N N Oo N O --d O O R LA o o 000000000 n 00 (� oo p�'p f� o 00 0 (� 0000r- n C Cho po cc � � ��No CD Df °° S. Ai\i z ° ^i � y� N C 7 N - > O OO C O paq 07O O RS IO m B 8 4 -3 o eCr�7 —_ CD CD N (D � N O N C [" N CD 4� O CD O A y ai p O occ _ o' O Y d m > � — CD �. 0 o � 00 Y IJ J J v .7 W W W J lA � LAU W W W N N _� V�i LAON C t�A LA A O Oo A A O O O LA a, LnO `D A LA ^. A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 C O C C C C O Cl O O C. •r O O O O O O O O O O O `C O O O O O O O O O O O ICJ O, ON N N N N N N N N N N N d O O O O_ O O_ O O _O O _O _ A A A A A A A A A A A � cn r s C 0 -8 o o o o w C c a o 0 It N < CD •�� T fD fD 0- r] ,y Q En CD CD W fD 7 O a G En • 'O ]co NJ En cm O G (�D Q4 W P CD C T `e CD cn cn 0 z z z z z z z z z z z n O O O O O O O O O O O p H f9 0 r Ra O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O v O O 0 O O O O O O O O .'�U. O � X C O C Wp �. C �] O IQ J VAi NW A Oq AONto m � pAp � AQ% •P J1� vA .J O 0 o LA m o c o c) �Oa a, o� d o z o 0 o m 07 Enm N Y �o - �oA oo In c Wie O O � O -9 A O N to Ln C OO '� �OON tNJn 'No O NOIJ W � O l�^D C) p) n w O W N W N W uj Oj N m O _ "ti N t) O N O O V] O c O O O O C ^wt O O O O O O O C d 0 0 C) O O O Opo 7 -� 00 000 x 000 00 w rn \O N b �D y Q N (�• -�• O y N y N m N n Oo S N N Ef. D O �O N O 0 O O < � aCD OOQ'• P� Q' � 6 � 'p 'C � .� N N � fP vOi 7 le - � � O � N BCD LA � c ? .3 � � � � y " og don' Qa � o z o off. � R° o 00 0o p LA A0 = A � A Cwm A ^ � Aw Ay A n O_ � � AN C " coo An AC A pO CD rr 00 C� P7 N� 07 C1 N N Q W W _ W oAo4:6 O O U Q W W U.) A ? N 0 0 po co t� C w w IAto o to •- --t C C p d\ 41 O cNJ= J� •P O O O O W W 'J —' v` 7 C O W W O W oc oo 00 6 0 O O 0 0 O W W to cA C •. L� O O O O O O O O O O y C C O O O O O O O C '* O O O O O O O O O C `C ON ON D\ N N N N N N N N N IQd Cl _O O O_ T ? A A �• A ? A A A co O n 0 _ c p c cu o W, o y CDq• c to s z CD cc K CD CIOb R o o fo N• O •�' `�' "3 CD 1 ,y C.D ,a •o ^3 w h fD Z Z Z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o y b p O O O ^ O O .: r _ A O O O 0 O O C Y A — A ~ 0, -- a a, — _ _ _ — — - - o _ -n rn — rn — a — o w o w O w o w o w o uj o w o w o w o w o w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o m o a 'O Sao Oao W J NJ �1 — -1 — �1 — �1 — a �l J — to -- A — A 4 � to Q• G, I a1 A A A n W O O O oo O A A A I I A T .P. A I � A I I C � _ 4C,44. � A p, 00 00 ,p — t0 ,O ^' w _ _ nD W — — — O+ ,O 10 O O C\ W W A W O W O W O Wcn CDW_ w_ U 'A 'S7 O O O LA O O O O W C CD tAh O tlAi O to Z N y O O O O O O O O O O O rn O O 00 O 00 O 00 n Q� b w w w w w w w w w w w w A A O O O O O O O a Oq tJl o o O o c W W W W W w W w w W LO W W W W m O O O O O O O Q Q O O a O O O O O O CD Cl Cl CD O ClO O CD `n O O O O O k O 00 OD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 m r mom — mom mom mom m m � m 'o 7� � - 7y °O7� °�° 7o °° .-. O W O W O W O w_ O W O W O W = W 3 W O W 0 W CD o co \0 CD O •� C t as ~oo _ as ~w ao oo ~o_v ao Oc or, �Oo, - G) -v v v p' N O' NO NO' N N ,_ =' NO NO N C ?� iz ?0 iZ3 W, �. NO7 my N y CD 00 Owco C) OCp CCp O_ co oiD Owco CCp QCD O � Cn � Ctp � O � _o " o_ Y v� ocno � O m m co co co co co co rn a O _ �j _ 7. A A A .:.t. A 2. A A A A A Z O y A O A A A a a W A O a .I... .ter 00 00 W OQ OQ 00 00 OQ O0 W O4 00 OQ .0.. A Cn En J to w coo (n CA J En En (n O 00 O w I I fD CD tp O N CD CD 0 Vi Co co „a � O, — n � �• O co co co tD ct tD co co co co z z Z Z rn pr y w rn rn m py to rn mW O O O O ON � bo tz to co a a a a (IQ w 00 00 04 O 1 J CD ,0 -4 0000 O N w ,NO W N O, O, U ,NO to 4 A O 0o - go J D -4 w O N N N ^-� t0 O, 0o in \0 O in to C C O O cn U ,O i,a �O �O W P �O J O p O p O A oA0 00 O O O O O O O ON p `O ,D _ WON 00 0 0 Q ^ d O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O O O O C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Q O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O� O� O, CS O, O, O\ a, O, O, O\ O, O, C+ O, N N N N N N N N N nS N N N N N Ntv A A A A A A A A A A A A A - A A A A O O C Y1D C 'O `b (�D `Z' ni `x 'S CD CAD n. aCD a QQ oho yCD eo CD ' < < r co nco w w eo CD ft A i 1 I I I I I I I 1 1 I I I I I V7 A b O Z L L Z Z z L Z Z Z Z L Z Z Z Z O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C m b 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 Q O O O Q O O Cl O C A O C C O Q O O O Q O O O O O Cl O Cl O i O, — A O W O W C W C W O w O W O W C W O w O W O W O w O w O W C W O W 00 N oo N 00 — Oo —• C lD 00 lD 00 00 — Oo Oo 00 �O 00 �O 00 �O DD .� O Op ' J 1 v D\ LA A A ' w N 0 O O O --] �O �o �O �O '•o �O �O 00 00 w �c 00 00 00 00 00 In I.r A ? O O ? Alp rD %O %O 00 00 00 00 00 00 O A A A A A A A O O A A O O O O O .b O O O In t O O O O O O O O O O O y O o 0 0 0 O o 0 0 o O o 0 0 o O w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 LP W W w W W W W w W W W W W w O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 aD 00 DD DD 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r m m m � m � m m � m � m m m m � m � rn m mom e ^ O W W W 3 7 W W w w 3 w 7 uj 7 w 7 5 w 7 w OO �, UQ 0Q 00 (1^ 0Q OG fiq OQ 0�0 QO Oq. 00 CKi 04 OQ s' N �' N �' N N 3' N O' N p' N �' N N �' N ' N O' N �' N �• N O' N ffi O CD O CO O (p O �p O CD d_ Cp d CO O CD O ((pp O_ aO CD d CD d ry O_ co O_ CD O_ T �. CD — CD CD N fi CD CD (D N co CD (D CD CD CD C, � A 7. A •. A �. A �. •A �. A �. A ^. A �. A 't A �. A =. A :. A �. A U0 7 00 OQ 00 UO OQ OQ 00 '""•— OQ OQ UQ 0Q OQ OQ �y W W 00 W W W 00 W W En W tn 00 W 00 W N � N � O 00 �{ -4 CoC (I�D � (•t�D Lh Cu 00 C 00 Nt ryN w (D N fD 00 (-D{ O N (0 N to O ro O OCD O Ocp (D O 0 O (nD ° co CD ° BCD fad ° N ° co CDN GO W N d y = 'Ap� /n y N w w wpi rn y N (n y^ y .. z N tQ — A V:p N °� N N J fix J NJ ? cNil O 3 N O . 00 O W rl )O O oo O �l O O .A D1 A J 6 00 O �A O j" C is w � N C O � VI U J m C O p O � — 00 C O � tJl � O w O in VI p w w 0 p 0 p 0 p 0 p C O p p p 0 t11 O O O O C C •A O c O n CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O C O C O CO C C C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O� O� ON A A A A ? AA A A A A A A A A A N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N C O _O O O_ O_ _O _O eD W w w N N N N N N N N N N — .n w C:N cn w \0 �O 00 (o O 00 �t (n o rn (xD o o a o fD eb CD ° a: °' co A ? Y w y o " CD y 9 cn �'' n N �. ..3 cn L 7 7 il2 CD 7r ^O z N w co CD COD (n ,�I (gyp ct CD E 9 A•I A % N 0q' �'` n T d N 4 V IA V O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O r rcV o 0 0 0 o c c 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cr O O O 0 0 O O O O O O O O 0 0 a 00 00 -- 00 00 000 00 -: 00 00 A A — A �- A — O, �' A w A d d A d d A d A d d a o d w CDw d w o w d o w W O w 0 w 0 w 0 W O W O w 0 W �o �c 140 �O �O 10 N %0 �o %0 1O !� i OO - 6 -4 601 O '-A 64 O W O O — A O 1, 00 ' — I. A W A "a p CD O O O O O oo Oo 00 00 Oo O O C) A �O O cp R) O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 00 16 00 0o O O O O O O O O O O O O O A O O V CDO O O CD CDO CD O O In O O y O O O O O O O O O1 CDO O d O O p; N N N N N N N N A A A A .4 A A. N N N N N N N N w W w w w w w C O �D O O O O O O CD O CD O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ^n O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 00 00 0o ao 00 0o ao 0o ao 00 00 00 0` 00 p pw pw p � pw puj p rn rnw m rn � rn � m rn � T I w CD � �,,> a w � �,� CD w 0 w � w � W w � w � w 'O — < � ,z << < :z < < ` < — Oq 12 CE oo O N CON CD N �? N n N c? N c? N CDN N :3 N p• N 7• Uq as Cn N �' t.� '• N O' "" N yr 0 O O cD _O CD O cD CD 0 cD O '. �- T1 'LD '4 TS 'O TS cD cD cD cD cD — A cp A cD A "COD A cD A cp A CID A cD A �. A _. A a, A O. A �. A A �, A oc —oo --ac -'oo —as --00 y 4l<< Aw Ay Ay Ay AO Apt i 00 C C�3 U� A� WN16 00 a9 J a CD 00 CD v (D A fD W cD N Q W 0 0 O O O O O ' O ' O O O 0 0 O co. O �• O CD• O O �• O O (nD C7 P1 y d P7 �' 01 y y y W w P� cn pt y y w y w d H m N 00 w NN A � oo Jv rl � BE 00 N oo � 0'10 CD W — a\ UukON rn o O cn 4 0 O bo - � -J � In A A O O � to d O pp 00 N N O O ON O� O O O O A .p O 000 00 A .p O O L, In O O C O O C M O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O "' O O O O O O O O O O O ►� ON O (71 ON ON ON N N N IJ N N N N N N N N d A A A F A A C A A A A A A A A t9 N �J N N IJ N N N N N N N N N N N A b A A A W W W N :P n W N N N w N N W W W W W N W W rti N �l ON LA 00 O J D\ In — -4 lli A v� to G) r x D Y O c m < c m c b co � o a < v, ct d a y N j BCD G = a "o � <' CFO < N m � CD v' R N CD o n CD t^^9 co n O =. y O i �. N R M O /7 CD o " CD CDn C 2 O CD x gE ddM n `G Z Z Z Z Z z Z Z 'z Z Z z z Z z n O O O O y A b 0 _ r (in 0 0 0 0 0 O O O rnNy Abx oo C) o% "o 0 — c — � — cc — = NO •G Y w O O� o .p ioA op. o o 0 on' o — o0 6 ° o c`Oi, tAC) o ° O S A� Z oA -i S S S S o � ONE c a AN .3 �:, o 0 0 0 LA O. O G O O IQ O O O O w LA Cl ClO O C 0 N N N N a• W R W d N N W N ~ N N N N N 9 2 NO �O ° O � C] O° p � po o0 Of -a o p Cl � v pWO CD O O v wmN •� 0 Wi vo < co co � �. No o v ° o m W. o z CD 000 o o O o 0 o O o o `O 9 co Y -� w CD n ? oa a Z oa o 3 CDaoLA cc ti V ti 9 ti A O CA w m O .fl N w w w w o w i N O N (D .• Q' y N Co A .•4 Cb CD CD W co O n• O Q00 O O O y O O 7� 'C, ^w W d m w w w w w nl. tj "\0 N _ — -a A A to Lit O` 10 \O �O�O A In rl rl "-,t� t N U W 3 N �N SS � N CF 00 91 C O O O y W v �] J J O O O O In L, LA ClOO O JO OO O O OO O ^' C O O O O O O O O O T O O O S S O O S O �! CD 0 4= b ro ON ON N N N N d _O O O M N p En m p — O cn w w CDCD ? A A A O w W W W W cn w co O oo P w � N ° [" y m G) C ( m m Cl. F < as ° N > Ell 0 c`CD N ry n. m ^a W o GQ c<t C y m n n7 <D N coW ° A w O lD CD W .O+ LA c v A "C A "b O z z z z z z z z z n 0 o c o 0 0 0 o p rD ro O ra [" .. CD — p S S S S S S O � O S S ClS S S 0 O . 00 W 00 W 00 W DD W 00 W W W c. 00 '- .--• ja {a OJOJOJOJOJOJOJO O _ � O 9 OO� OO� Z W ?7 .r o0N 1010 17 ! , Q o p Do � o � P .o � •nz ? o o moo p ool O , O , O , D P � 00 _ ? � � O r O00 O O O O O O O CDw v O N N N N N N C � o 0 0 0 0 S p0C7ol 0p0yo [" o Z %ho 0 00� ^nF NoN3 C Z w 0 0o ro00 0 cD cc o0 00� 00 � D m b �, Z o0 0 � oQ C7 U) -1 NN N �? N � N �? N � N � N � ^ Z �. N � En77 O N � ON On Nn N � � N Owo 00 00 00 00 O4 0 � 0 � zoy o � > =. o0 bo oco co 0 � on Oo A J -0 .fl .' `O C M. � � R. 9] r Oro? yn O 00 W "0V_Oi• y 000 m 3 3 �' w cj 0a o d w a y' w CD UJ � VJ VJ fp Vl 4] y � S7 fl7 .. A 7 C w G OQ LA Lo, _Y Ln O O LAtw/, O O a: � O O O O O C O O O 66 O O ul LA m 0\ ? N n/ m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 'b O� ON ON as qN N N N N N N O_ O _O O_ O O _O A A -9�. A -P ? A Ariq co ? A cn v) 5' & 0 ro 0 co (IQ ,y a 'fl co CD 2 En �o _ e CD coc 0 CDy P) CD CD .y n 00 00 (21 < n J fb A a• y -s O O 00 fD 00 to 00 y ,r. 4 V �r V O z z z z z z z z z z z n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W fD 0 07 O O O O O O O O O O O `+ CP O 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O O O O 0 Cl 0 O O O 00 ...j 00 00 .j 00 ..j 00 ...j 00 .-] r A w r ^ � A — A X, m m m .-� .� O Om O W Om O o m C O C �] ovw .^. W N W N W N W N W N W N A 00 '.Dy — .p-1 — < 1 00 00 g0 00C) 0000 � n o -+ m o o = a o 1 �+ 1 n. 1 �+ 1 n. 1 d 1 C 1 a"Cs OO ' m w tip , CD o cc o cD o cD o cD o cD o cD /� o "' 0a' CD 0 � � o N N N N N Kj N A r 0 0 CL ON o O O O O O O O to R uj O rl O O _ r m 0 � a PD °�° K, Oc n ° � ? 'p "n � 'n � c�D e 0'n d A Q A d z aKi 9 w a 0 � rn rn rn ..1 n y co N Obi a N Obi N N 0 co N m (o N Obi (G N [D � ?t N p 'a 0 o Coo oxo ono ono C = � o m o j � p _oOOfD .30�cD A0 ft ApA AO� AO�co AO�CD CD C� � � 0 70 A o -3Oo Am a' o T , m w 00 w O O O = o O OOQ C co co 00rT (A fA fn td N fA mh.. 'z N m W C. UQ W W 1V ^ Lit Ili IQ O IQ O VI 00 00 l,h L'i N N 00 00 00 00 A LA th U W W 00 00 Oa 00 00 O 00 AA A" 0� 01 A O C O 00 a0 00 00 00 O 00 O 0000 00 LA (A C m O O O O O O O O O O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o < 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 C O O_ En C x QT m C w co C C OZ A G C N < (7CD N N y C CD 5 D N O r CD '9 w b 1 ~ 0en CD m C ;a 'a 0 pD(10 m cc < < CD CDC CDC < �' (D O. C fD < co V7 < vCD � f n V V O y A b � r CD00 � — — — V oo — O A. pC s+�pp0M n a 0NDL10 C) OCO � CD m C Z a O aoe'i CD CD Z N N O 4t cD O A awAAAAA ti N 7c O — A A LA3 O 00 (A 00 O 00 CD coO O O coO O z N A n W W W N VI A T W W 3 to v1 ` o lh w 0 — VJ °, o o — yco �i -� Yo 0 0.� CD CD NG N � Nr O ° c � o Y 6 Co z y oNy N ^ C7 Yy O _Q' _� � N C- Ot (D � G) .a Ny N (7 n N Nf�D NO. N• cz to `-, oO7 c .�� „opo oc, o �n ] Oo n oR° o �o " c) ern eD •�— °J A °c 0 A d O Q. f+ OZ A G A a• O _ yam z i,,D ,_,,, � (n O O ja, ° A ct <^o o = of m o CDCcm co N c cn m R' oo ON = m A m coo --3 as =_ 3 ^ -1 n C" w 0 ° cn Oo w• 7 y^ y m CT7 fD fD a4 r � y N �1 .1 � pN� ••r _ — a V% _ N N 'D%C O O 0 0 G AA W �O N mo o W W W 'J U LAN W CD CD O CD O O O O O 00 O �-' O O N O0LA o N N N O .C.r C O O O O O O O O O O O O O C C O C C O C •+ O CN CN G1 N N N N N N N N N N d O O O_ _O w A A A A -P A A A A A -d z -O -a `n a 9 p d C. G. O 7 Oci 00 "C U0 >.. C w CD N 7 O w C) O O 00 oo c c CD a N A � O O n a N CD /�• NtA W N N Chi n'CrQ N W N CD A v \ w n in A 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o` FA A to O r 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v, LA -- V1 u, — v, — AK N � N LA LA LA — In Ln 3 00 oAOA O_ A Qw Ooo O OwOwOwOwOw O 0o kA -- vi W -4 — m C=1 A Y ON 00 -- 00 00 -- 00 00 w ut ' ' 00 ' 00 00 ' 00 00 ' O wLn u, � O VAiw (LA A ---] toOt1a 0N � � � O O n O C O O O O O o 0 O O O O O z O (p 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 tb vl W VI V1 U IV w N O O A A O O O O N O N A O m O O O O O O O O O O O O O O %•' A .P A ? A E: A fv A A A N A N N N N N A Do 00 0o Oo 00 -� �O W u, w w c) ut A A A A A O O O o o O O O O O O O O O O O ^ _ �o 00 00 00 00 00 --] �O �D �O �O �O �O o0 Ode Cow v� c� � � o n � � � � � 70 z � A �' Yo G < N C N y N N O O p; (p O (p O (p a (p O (p O Uj co N a \ 0 `, m oo co °�° a °= o % O 2, w El w � w 21 W 2, ` m z m p N "L7 NG. N O- N N NT, .:s N N (n Ntn t) Nfn N7 C O N O O O5• O �• a O n• O d R O z (p to O (p O0 O (p' O �• 'Tf o go-`-• to 4A, ry A� Ato� Aut00 A A •mn � O C � w A00 tA (p A (p w (n ao O 00 m 00 cc tA Cl (A y .z- O y' w �l a� O ON n O O" W O O C C C C ,�, G .. y A� O "ToCD 00 m m a m"a a, ° m m > .- � N• . �, -A c �. as w to LIJ ON N N �l al• — — to � 00 00 v' IJ N N vt vi A O O o0 00 00 O O 00 0 0 O O NN N ( m 0 C O 0 CO 00 0 O O as ONW O 0 ON w00 0 0 ID + C O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O C O O O O 6 O O C '. O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O `C Q O O O Cl O O O O O O O O ON Oti ON O� O� ON ON .. � t � � N N N N N N N Nr N N N N N _O O O O T A A A A A A •P A A A A A A 0 w C n trnCD p m O .. N fC O fmn fmn wcolmn poj y �• CD CD m 'o a r 0 =r 0 0 0 0 0 w y 7 r- m w < co y m rQ CD 1 1 1 1 1 N c � T ? o o SD 4CD ? 7� m w � R N W (D � A m (D p y GCpSNy I F 1 �r V O z z z z z z z z z z z z z n 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 y O v o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .. Co a o a o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C o 0 o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -43 a` -- P� - .F. D.. -c z � w wo � o0c npiwtn � o ou 00 00 m T� Op Z o coi o ,n o W p W 5 W O Np c p d w ct � V Ln L E. LA LA � w , w o w o m o CD c o o w o o oco00 o ti z Nn 3o c OO � m Noo � O � O 0 Y a � LA o °; � c? ' ? 2- ? - N � o oo yQpoO .. Afo - m s o o cn T -4 (.A o �.Cl) ° °' to0 At o W O° ' °_ tJ0 7 A � G bQ en h 00 00 00 00 00 — lA th l.A v W 01 Ui 4�. cA In J ^ U kA W 00 -1 �1 W W W .p A A A � Vi Qo 00 00 pO O O 0\ O, °� W W N 91 00 C O O O � � 'O 0000 00 O %O 00 v 00 00 "T C m p O O O O O O O `C O 'b Ch O\ T p O O O .p 4�6 A A w _O CDy O 2O co p o `< to to to S M O A 7 LA kA LA 0 0 N o ar 12. �a t1 n i�' r,' cu co a g as fD CD CD � b � m cc co G O •- J p � n (D v7 r fD z z z z z z z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 v C ^o — c i rn O oa �0 o wZN� -lu,o �� "o �O 2 w o o -o 0 0 �j Ila a Cp N O N ^G 0 `r co o o CD .y O 0 Z c) co wo o -o a fi N O tr o O .p N Z `o co ^ a °° -j n IJ Co rn 2 m m _° P * "3 nOOv Qoo �� o Na =o Z � A � rr' � wy O En O 0 p CT7 p cn 'P�+ ^'1 d ct oa x D 7 _ °w tto w a o ON lJ w lh to �O `D N O G O o 0 ,•� A N 0000 00 O O V-A LAtA O NN O 00 N to Ln p ^. O p O O C O O O .j O A fjQ O. O tlQ n R °} Lo t�D m _ A N .rj V 1 V O z n z o 0 Z o ro o � p O O O o O d O p CD p O O w A — V] AJCn N — W N � ANC Awl Q. •A � a OpC — p — Ra o cNn 00 o c �° � o0W0 �j NJCAIoA � � o � En � ON Lh W m y O p X C W �. C, P1 d � O V] p � O � W � Cp O �• N O C. N LA Ap CD N A 3 N N N O 0 CN CDC d O u7 O O O O O O m � � fD n 3 C � m � N rod0 3No' �° p °�° «� °�° � °�° � C = C n � NO Q N (D � ��• N C — � � fn � to � N toaw ^_ tJd �a x O �. � w \ ON � N� C � .. .00•-• O O� OCD OC OCD ul On O °' CD 00 CD LA uj CD Oi tp O O_ v .. .n•. 0 b CD N O QO O •�-, O O m 5 7 tp CL OQ y CL y = a n h ct N IJ W W W N N 00 NN N AA oQ Qo W J v U NJt- .. C O O W W O O O O O ttA VUi U OWo Owo 00 00 v JLh O �] CDO •- O O O O O O O O O tD tOD O d O O O O O d O A A A A A A A A r O O O ft O' :"Z- .O•. OOQ C y -�•t V] O 7AC Cn In fn T. 'O 2 � C O n CD Z � � 1 n d W fD C �• O �' VC QQ n n v' is o 0 0 o z z z 0 0eb 0 — eb OO 00 O CD C- i o A .o o r p O w � C 4 � A z > � J LAoo"oLLA o� oo ;pip o oN j oo � � wo °° o400 � T . 0 o z uj o ? o 60 w m N o < ca W C N C A O w O C n O (n NJp N --• W ° O O p +' p C A O U � ^� � � � � j � R° ^� o � -3 po po p o`� Ul — o z -o m O O 00 0 �o n oo C n O � CD Oo -� (5 En ten, a cR° C�C (n = O � 'fl• N m• !j 3 r �N �. N N C N7 1.��.) � G ° w -�-J m O A ^ p •�-, A �7 O J �, A A (7 m`C -�• 'p O c�i •p ._ m A ^ A '"3 r_ w < W En n C A s w o ?' Ln o w coz oa w a, 5 c -J tin CD cn w CD 0 m• iy ° O Oq CZ G NCD p m E LA tA � w t" _ .- O U V 1 po IJ tA U �o tA N W W O J J l.n V1 oo Oo 00 ON 01 91 O N 0 N _ p O O O cn 0 0 to " N Oo Oo 00 p 0 0 J J 0 0 0 0 O W W W O CD O '+ a O O O C O O O O v O O O O °� ? _ W m _O Cn N ',y to Cn 00 00 n s CL n C Ci m z _ Cn m OG ? •� C �• OQ y N y CD r z � a' o CD 1p A �. Cy c� 0 o o z z z z owo = ° c o o o o o .. o 0 0 0 ^. o � Y "•1 w W tAi, Cm' ? A O O w o 0 C. %A o X o 0 0 o o a o -o o ego p w w ;o b, 0 o O c w y It CDQ. — VAi O —P, z :A: C O z c i 7 .� •A A N �• N C A Ci C w w w w w w w O N O C7 w y 00 00 Co 0 N N N O w y rnNv� mmn, -• o m od od o x � o � Yo c9i `ram o 0o r o e \ n -4CCoi ` 0 c� oo Cif —,a T � on ❑ `oC� t- RL p Co N N N n N .9 _ s'oo' AC PCA c A� �� A z -0acm A p vo 000 o p ca ? w OT =t O oo w w P 0o ao ^o A W w 0 0 0 0 � vwi POCNii t�'i� N N N tow 00 A •.1 O O N N N 0 0 O W W h.� a O O O O O O O O O C C O C C C O O O + O O O O O O O CD O, O, O, NJ _O O O O O_ A A A A A A A A A A m m m m o coMIx em CDu^+' oo co co v cCDi n m C cr �' n 4 a ; cn c9 co = w w w' to v� - - o CD co 0 co co 00 w o CD vo Cc, o o_ N N w o N 00 V] n eD 2 m N r O ft r. b t y �a `e 0 4t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C1 0 H A O -V r OQ it N ^O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O i O O O A O O O O O O �o t A O O C O O O O r^p CD C W — N A A IQw N A N N O ON Cl In O a\ N O O O O A y O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O W W W w W W W W W W W W W L4 W W W W W W w W 00 00 00 00 W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 Oo 00 00 00 Oo 00 00 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O Cl O O O O O O O O O O O C �• r 00 00 DD 00 00 00 00 w w w w w = w w 00 DO 00 00 00 00 00 C,i9 ' V] ' [r ' mR! mZ'- m2 (www � �77 � [iJ � (17 � Crj � wizim � Ci1 � Ci1 � m Ci9 � [i7 � V] � 9 N N N N N N N N m N N n A ` T ` N J f9 J N J co J N J CD ` J N J cD �l F. J N J co rl fD J J CD J fo J p NO T NO N N N _ N ,O„ N „� N N ,� N N N „�„ N N N .:� N ,� N N N ,�„ .o _ _ o =. o =. o -• o _o o �. o _ 0 . 03. 0 0 �. 03. 0 -• 0 _. 0 �• o . oro3. on. 0 r O c — �- �- 2 (D — n n �- a cD n o e Sa' CAC 'PCAC 'Aoo Aoo' A _Ca' C 'AC � CA� A _C � C •P _C � CAC_ ACAAJb � A o°o e oao o°a as _ a'o � Ic �o 00 w w Z O\ N _ m W W A v N N �O W w W O — — w A O w W A N w w 00 J 91 O J �O W W 91 !A N �O O --• tr �..• N N (n 00 A 00 w �O co N W w 110 C G7 C O O O O O C O O O O O O C O O O C O O C O .t O O O O O O O O O O CD O CDO O O O C O CDO 0 `C O O C. O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O b O\ C1i O, ON ON ON D\ 01 ON 01 ON ON 01 ON Os 'T N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N G O_ O_ O_ O_ O_ _O O_ O w A A A A A A Ja A A .A A A A A A A A A A A A A m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m p io io (o (c co (o cc co iD co (o (o iD (o (o co cc to co (o 0 3. 3. 3. 3. o' n o' 0 0 o' o' 0 o o 0 0' w m m m m En cn (n W W En rn rA W w w cn (n En In C/i W U) w U) c CD co CD CD (D (D (D cD (D fD CD (D co (D (o (D CD (D (o N co (D o' o' �' �' 0 o' 0 o' o' 0' o' 0' o' 0ro fCDA (WA Vim] rA w N y w w W f(A w ww W (CD CD M CD cA w m m en m N A R fD n (o m Gn x b O z z z n O O O 0 O O O O O O 0 O O O O O O O O O G y (D b 'O O 00 - o 0 0 0 0 o c o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 co x CD0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a N = o _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a o 0 0 0 0 o A 0 0 0 CD 0 0 0 0 0 _ o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 a 0 :V;- � ow cy o � C C N C W C m _�O �D �• C' pti pto O (A p W A lr ro n `'' n -- � •A N O � O � .A A m W W -p w O O O co e0 00 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 co00 00 00 X o 0 r r � N f�9 N � N � Ny m0 CD C?1N < �•r .`I [17 in J'�3 \ a CD � O N Pt. N d N N (• N N y L o vo ao Li co D � ao N N00 W W 00uj D` C •A O O �' �o 00 C a O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O °+ x co w " ° w CD CD CD ,e �t .. n cn C a 5 � :3 C w co 03 a m c°o coo ego coo A x eeD to CD 0 U 2 O z z z z z z n 0 0 0 0 0 0 m eo `d O w c°Oo 0 0 0 0 0 0 N O O O O O O TI IC CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM #5 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: August 2014 Financial Reporting SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director THROUGH: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Finance Committee SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item..............................................................City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Finance FISCAL IMPACT: NA SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to accept the August 2014 Financial Reporting Packet. No specific motion is needed as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operations and report the financial (unaudited) statement to the City Council. City guidelines suggest the Council be updated on a regular basis. STAFF REPORT: Attached please find the comparative financial statements for the month of August 2014 reflecting the monthly and year to date detail, comparing the actual results to the 2014 Budget. --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item S] September 16,2014 The most significant budget to actual variances are highlighted below: Revenues: • Building Permit revenue for the month was 3% below budget and the year to date results are 9% better than budget. There was one new home started in August bringing the year to date new home starts to 17 compared to 23 in 2013 and 20 in 2012. Although fewer homes, the valuation amount to date is very close to 2013 due to the average home values being greater than the values used to estimate revenues in the 2014 budget. In addition, a new commercial building permit was issued in August which was valued at $1.4M. • Zoning and subdivision fees are well above budget for the month due to the budget assuming there would be very few zoning exceptions requested. This has not been the case, resulting in $6.7k in revenue for the month and $14.4k on a year to date basis. • Plan check fees for the month are 24% better than budget and the year to date results are 30% better than budget. As mentioned previously, the valuations are higher than projected resulting in the revenue also being higher than budgeted. • Miscellaneous permits for August includes a special fuel tank permit for $7.5k. Due to the unusual nature of this permit, it has been broken out. Expenses: Most departments were at or below budget for the month due to diligently managing expenditures to the bottom line. A few items to note: • Administration — In August a temporary employee was utilized to cover the front desk in the absence of the full-time employee. This expense shows up in contract services expense. • Elections — In August the election judge expenses were paid out and are reflected under part-time salaries. The expense was split between August and September in the budget resulting in the variance being a timing issue. It is anticipated that the full year expense will come in below budget. • Police — As mentioned in July, the cost for policing services is billed each year in two installments. The amounts were budgeted in June and December. The bill for the first half of the year was billed and paid 8/19/14 resulting in the timing related variance. • Public Works—The part time salaries are $3k higher than budget for the month due to all salaries being budgeted in the full time salary line item. On a year to date basis, the sum of the two salary expense lines are above budget due to the extra costs for snow removal as well as the summer focus on street repairs. • Streets — Due to the summer focus on street repairs, the street maintenance expenses are higher than budgeted for the month but within the full year budgeted amount. New signs were purchased and installed throughout the City resulting in the majority of the expense. Contract services for August included the cost of $4.5k to rent the spray- patcher for street repairs for a second month due to the good results in July. --page 2 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item S] September 16,2014 • Tree Program — In August the City Right of Way's were trimmed. This was budgeted to be done earlier in the summer. On a year to date basis the expense is 7% more than budgeted. • Parks & Recreation — As mentioned with Public Works, all salary costs were budgeted under full-time salaries. In total, the salaries are $1.8k more than budget for the month and $4k below budget on a year to date basis. Landscaping materials for the month were $1.4k higher than budget due to having the resources available to focus on the parks initiative. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends the City Council accept the attached August Financial Report. ATTACHMENT: 1. August Financial Reports --page 3 -- z f e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e Iri i In c ^ ro o � c � � � N M a m � r c e•, N tV r n Q Q 0 NI M 1'1 N eV �O O VI �G vi C ^ N N O N R 4 Y1 4 N �i 7 Q F 7" V N R IO R W W M P O .0 W O IO J P M W P R Q M W P P n n O O M N l C O tb � M1 �D D r, 1 rri V O 41 1�1 4 1'1 1- ;� r-•i ri O � C IO _ a0 1(1 O M O OO .O P .O Iry h N 1 C P j o YI C rl O N O Q W C G O O q Q N In G .� IT ro R .-. p� O ^ O P O �I �0 O In G 1(1 O O tK C "' P A O 1'1 CI ram. ac ri ri o O r I� o G n of Z F=-> 7- 0 C O v000 O� a t�1 R 1 P O (1 N O O O a I OG O C O O OG Q C .M. O O I, o 4 CI O O n O R N Q O N: O G P O N O C N .0 OO 1%1 N V1 of O Oa O M W C In G O r G O W U In O O W P M m r Q C O O N C E In a E o E a E (7 C `w 14 � w 2 s w U W C c ° o C Ci Z N z u 00 G G F F F F F F F F \ § IS e � (( ( / / 7 ) \ k \ )$ \ \ \ / � § > {! G f ? f \k } \ k \ r \ \ GE / \ } 6 � 7 m 4 ; / 7 « ■ ! § m ( _ � / ■ K \ § 2 w g - 2 ) ( \ / } 7 a} 0 § / / \ C } ! m 2 e e J a § » ; u I 0 G y 3 •O Tr• � O J✓i Y W C _ C 3 d 0 T 79 o C o G o $ o w a— z a QUQv d o ep• o e e e�yy a mpp e epp e e e o op e e o e at ggam,,e e e e e It e e e e e e e e e e e e e O V�r �/1SDrN0(N`1Gr0/IOO QP o Spcpb��Soc�'3 o;c+�v�o op�c�000•r.' O A. C j O r:O S Pv gado l-,Z?;E; ovo•S oo•o $�'o•cg000ggo naoo•ago�lagN�,, go 1Y M ayyC M rddf in O N 0 0 P O rl N� J�o O O C O O S C O j O O O 1 r�. 1 C C O O O I� rn�?,1^,d rV Sj-PPP P C-O�I•v01?Ov�m O T Cl a�oa d VJ rN- �NI••nDJ�a$o vMi �n •- 7 Q F- r o h o r; Sr, '/1 g Oi O a M c0 O 1 O O O f� N N N n N •D V1 x r• C M^w r e •G^ h 0•O r O_ a� o;V1 r M O •D O�d u y, F�vi P - nl r r_V O rl < - r o S c o o S S 9 S 8 S F5 o o ED o S R O 8 o T S S O O O P C O P �G O lJJ S c p p S O O In - .'� O =Ql}^ nioo�ri r� e o or- ell e e a e e e e e at a e e o e e e e e g am. o a e o o e e e e e o e e e e C ' r oog�SS�000mc Qoo°h°�C; ggoO000Sri•SSoco�� Sco ' °1 oocc000000rlg0 w 66 oo6C;C56ci ggoovddddridN.ddd� 'C ra � pp p pp pp p p pp pp pp pp pp d ..-. SOO SO SO SO S d Oh Q ram.SapoS$d �0000000PP0000 h Sr S S OO 2`� C p rl V G J^C O O P at• S O r�N� 1 v01 Yri� W F> z og coor3$ vopop0ospo 0ovGgScC�oS as oSo0odSi aoo Q'y Cf O O C O O C N C D o n C O o O P C by O C O C O$ O G P^P C O P C n O G OC C � N O-P d - - V�O 1�� �N 1� •FO SU rJ-- v �t •d vo Q n � a O pp p pp p p pp po p GOQOO?�OOOO S SP C OS O�SOOOS O SPO SJS V ZC S yJ SSC OG Sa•J C OO.'�OOO C 00OS G g p O00C�0 jOG Ci0 6 g Og.^�' ig C OOOO C1 N m M O O O d O O C V OC 0 0 V1 d O C 0 0 0 0 0 0 d w w P r V n1 N O O M O O N O n)N C F M b O O O O O O O O O O w Or w O.�G N O O GCj O w Vr r Yl r` j O rn O O�G_ �+C •L r C G O O 0 0 0 O VI r`O oe G N Oi O`� 0 0 nl d N l� F O M In r0^W w .• . M O h O= P.�..00 Nr N F M�D �R O V1 O P O O O O O O O O O O O O O RR O O O O O O O C C O O O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 N U R O O O O W O O b r0l1 C d a O 1� O rIi r N OC N O N N O O e•O O N ^Q, rcv Irioad Ci vi r%1 L o �a ern w�rS �.= i•.:ri �J•i.-m N .:o rl M O It L m y a w a IV o c p _] W~EE o c �° :a�=1 U. 30 o V v Z 0-me q Yl Yl 5 3 3 0 'pJ• a a a.,•5� ` G c a CS m a c a s �' m E y ? a `c V a m q}-..r d v a g U r c F M '� g L C v i. C C c t v. v > 4 c oo Fi U ti.`I�Jn m P.-� u o Q o'ia EE o v o S o 'C apv. o E c m c Q Fix hod:J eUU Ca:.l�L wv wad.. a 8y�..�rU E JO '° `-C° _ ate' di•�Y v v•a:c E b.9 'E FF! Q u q u u h v I U o c v E .I :: v c"� m E > E m }j ban -a I•o- to 5 9-'3 '3 8? G'2 mw �° 'd- YA - ��mW_n c uA �ir.a �3 �xmmmxa na�m wx� naux�u �av auu: � �5Q -II � Z? U o 1 $ g F u y F E > 2 V ad r a � V 0a 3 a u 5i U.00p �. eu U.�5 m= 3 z "e e e v e s e o e e e e s o o o a v o e e e e e e s o 0 o e e s o o a o e e e 0000SvPo PrgMM o'o.�ro ,00• o 0a ,Inv-crlo o m o00o v,Iooy vOR ri rir ooPo- ov,o�'oln lr�ri-lno-r�SnSo a,SSSSOSvo � OcooSSm�S;' vrid�r .co�od�Sv$oS,�ria'r'o1=�,�rnMSgo�4 �1SS000S�m In � pp p p p pp v1 p 1 y O O O p?In 0 0 0 rPi vi O O C S .�O O 11: rP+,O IO S O m Q fY((��O a N rl S n O O S O O C pQQ .�-. 1�ern 0 0 O°c o.00 in M n .O M/N'1 C A N•�+T rAn h O n n y n O W P n Irc,O^In n P N V N In V -ri In- O aG .-N �C T r�In rl P M h V u � > F } Q r C Q O O ID In P O r Q C P rl o pp r n h O n A A N o N 0 0 0 C O O C d Svi O O�D M S M M OOrrI IOS t�l IO MO .00 v,^vl rl rpOy.--NrJOA InOOC OOOT Q K.O O h 1� O rl rl?O P h 0 0 A OG rl-N r11!�W M O A N O rl•"•ri In O IO 0 In g O O O O O V P ac 1 I P In In A h .D M N N O In h C N r r 0 0 A P e L� oC h h r•1 P O 7 O A O lr y'}.N..• Ml r O_!� rC CI 'P A..r V...IN .-. p ry _ A va p pp pp pp pp pp N O pp pp o S M rI S?0 0 0 V O W O n c O O O O O O S o 0 0 0 c O S O S O 0 0 S O O P p p S S S S S S vi.ri.op of 61C ma O�ri ao0 ppo�CG C tJOloopC p O ppCC Iri CJl1 $O C�n�p W IR P A O rl S-O M r O�b 0 0 0 O VO,� h.Op Cy O O�p A O C F A n M O h h �. 7 b Io 'IN N P M M r 0 0 0 0 C C S O IO S�O IO W O S 8 f c h i N oBooSoo; > p p p p p O C OOOO S?O In.ODD S�Q COOO,S��S S?? O?IrAi 'R?OO cO S C IrcjOOOSSS�a z 0 1 000000 SS0000SSo voga^o l$SSa Soi'So�S�S4u n cooSSSSa`d III oSSSSSva 4soco Ino oPvcoor aov.=ooro� ce.rood000vi �000000NN C M O h h tom! rP M-O O O oo In N C�OII 4 J>0 qJ -^J h In n N O S O O?COS O O.AO O r�h O S C O B S O O O S O O O C JOGS 0 0 0 0 g S S S S 0 0 0 0 C Iry A M O IG IO O C O O pG C.'7 O C O tr C O O O C O OO C O O O Iri G O C o O j Iry 0 CO h " h T m P r n C S rMrt n1 r In n r+l N m -• N N r, L e a e o e v a e o o a o o e e e e e e e e e o 0 o e e g e e o p e a a o e at o o e o 0 0 0 e O 0 0 0 6 6 , V O In C C OO O Q N O O{ I M O ' 0 0 ^M'r OO p 0 �r C:0 0 ^ .+p' II Op O Iri O N A OO O In h � M M IO IO IG IO .p .p O V O A 0 0 O p ^n ^A O� h M m M --Cm O O e 0 e O p 0 0�F.., orlree000e.i ocpao;0000ec000gSi�ococccoeoolo ooc000cop W C N rV G 0' O V OO P V A O rry P J Ci 0 0�0 0 0 0 C O py 0 0 0 N C O C)O J/j C W O G C O C C O C O } C7 P b M M A O VI O N rAr1 VOA V P O O C IOn O C b C O b A IM!! O V/u, T a m ID T LL m N INVI O r1 n f{ C N T O C V rl In r4 ID M M P C O aw U adn $ Ca o a o a o E- _ y '" c ❑ o E m a c o o E �I°d o e aaa o- &� u Z u ' o C E•e e :• 6 o a >. 5E o �' `� 'd .Y1'�,a o 0 i6 c U Uyy $ o pp� ❑ C'E V o a rn a i p a o u o u 3 a.110 � a o t�iJ Q .s u G a.� o Q V o u$ y'u, a W t cu en o. O 3 �i Q'C aui u a E C o S Q V U uJ u c o u u o m [3 Q w q o o �i�1 LE �41 a 3 S o u F �v s 3 0 a z <€u° `F�° _5=U o'ca V v a o $u F mi 0 U e A V L C c U U >^U L O u P IE O � � m u 0 ❑� y c „ 0 �Oa w e_e e e e e e e e e e e eppta e e g g g e e e e e e e e e e e e e O�� YY Y Y Cho N S m V N C O H f`I V1 P P M O JO N C r rl V 1�O P O ar n} > p yy v P O S.No S S h m$PO S 7 v v o v Vet o S r p S Oho 00. P h h f1 T O'On PP R e0_M<.�a00.00 S O t 1 'IN Q ao ' S rl V rMn O�D fP`I x�O'1 tom- et n M CI M c�Y1 v r1 n ,n o0 y ymj t'tl F r O V,fn N M..p. O 1��•eo PJ IO O O e Q d'M n ONO r O .O h r0�1 aD O O• a' vpi M h'?S r h�M+t J .MO r ryO O rl v 6 1n Q oSe SOSoSSca. ochc In 1-CSSSSS�SSSSSovej vh,ncroio oS �p`�,.oiSSvoiSty� a �rolmnp S6in oSS,.piS�op%�1 ODn .Oh- -.oN$`ci, o�rrlrlrZ v.-,nwe crl c ,n.-w P m o eeeee eeee � '�e e ee e e a'e�e e eo ee e e e e e e e e u,CO P h h T j O O rNOQ n'JOSry 14 �vPi, uPi 7 S 0 SSS S SYOIS S OOP — 1O 7 c O h r l CI`O•'M O O O N O O h N vpi M ro h r,PO O N O O`g O f`I G O O OO F � z O pp pp �J NpTr OOSOh OO 00 SS a Of�e�r..°OO P.nOO C S S Ovoi,SSSStMn OG ai M .O vi O m w O y M 0 0 0 0•./Oi C r•C G O C O CO R P N rlO O v�i P O tN R C rl p U ri vi .a rl - It Q F O.O ago O.S S S S S 0 0 0 0 C S v O o S S S O O S S S S S O S N s C d' N+t G O G p O O O O C C ri C O O:ao O O vi O O G O O j G.7 O OO m U O O o 0 o D o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o v a Y o e o O D o e 0 0 0 0 e ,y r,r•0 0 T O O M M OO O N 1n O h P Q Cp n< O M.D O O R P M O 0^OO .O n n oc m r P�O 1D Yr t�O�O N O l7 W O T D\w O G W]YI O P O.O.O f�i t�i P ^et�r, N 1n O tp G C a0 M N OG ao T O rI C G p O�ro G rl O C N O G O 4 0 0 4 4 0 0 0 0 N F on.+..'RC!CR R R19 or;InryaoeocGocoGcoo.. cooa000a0000000a o ..oov�oo d c o o od d o d o vi vi Ewa o1rMPN 000.o Goolnry xn nM oo covlov o noo T u? r�a m., .-e.�eln N.o oo ae r1� NP ,eM 41n.- n o hry (L 5 ry N1 f`7 00 Q.� Q M ^ ��D 1f1.••P N T � m C u?O 04 u C C u ,0 O G u 0 p O O ' a s.3,a' �'^m B E .n 1-E- w uf ° `u � 5 &S u -dd e 6 A o p E^. Yu! a `� o c YJ U a F U�UU P � yes yZp� U LZ Uv ne. m A ua<. o f ko^ vNc v p �n ���3zoSt` �4 VUCC � au 2 0c QV °nF� 0u r U 0 C � s F- ro 'r C p L G 4 v e v e o 0 0 g .�v�a -°.��rmon�oo,e W T O P 1 • �m O N M O O h N O r$6 0 P �� O�vi�N� n 0 '�•G q•O pp I N O W 0 0' O L O O O p �l N pp r g q N m '_Vl P U A O N v�vl oD m M 0 0 r rl 0 Oi�S 0 4 sY O N�O�Q C��O O .N• � N Q r M P P O o0 m O N N1 m 0 0 p O m m^ O co;r•D •»rl ry ryln •oa a a�Qq'Nw$tl^pt-Z-I000ri�10 oo 0000n �� o,o,^ro$iv�vo•Oo 000 ,o•rq^ x It VZ 4 ^ $qo,a n o C$o o o o o$$$$�'C Nv $0 0 0 o c m 0 0 0 pppp 0 p O O C O p O m 0 0 0 00 .`ten r m=bOO VO �p�OOOOS 000 N `eSO N C OpS�C OO P a Yf•n q Yl r m r1$S m- r1 N V� O O -•b m P Q a N O a o e e e e a ep a epp a�yO o e eeC D o v e o a ep e e-eq e e a o •>: r;aPo•O O Vt O 1I C J IfS O O$O Ov^ M C S C O F O O OO O O G Iri O p G A O P•-�arc N q �C O a nv nccv oNc$roo$$$$a r n oo nr oow� n m o•-••nP oomo•oo N oo n v,ln oc •ov voo:bo r E7 '- z 0 aor'"ico�$nog�oo$$$$•: .rc O-N-o ff g O G C C 0 eJ C G C O oD O O.ao 7 C rl e; r $�ov�i000000$$$$$Qc$a $$ $ 25$$ rjoo$- O N N C O$N h N T m u e e e e eQQ o e s e e a o o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a e e e e eQQ e e .Q r: O 1mD Vi P GPG r O O S O O O r C P?00 V IA O tOY VI GC b + r VI.-• 'O C •� O p a O O m •G•C O •-•!n < G Vl^ •G E o obbb . In v ., o - r h v n eomv v vb 3 b o r P n o e e o e o o c o 0 0 0 0 o e o o a a o .e o e o•o z o m.. oGooGG000� ocoonl Go �!~i1 vdrimd000000$oodddoa oc vlcooa0000 ' ��N lajl,•±P r1 � tf �O •.. N n V q rl•N-.'..:r-N N W LL co N .E '1 E ? o f 3 s`, a F�den C e S1 o o _ 'o c b v o a oo u c Q a u c 'oc ou'ac y Pi" o • A o c F U .5 n o q m yy 9 � .� c G v z c 5G o In wtoU 8 $ 3 $ m �° o riaii� x30awUl--a � OmU -w V mr �axaF" F 0 d N � C U G c c € E o .$ DL F !II .D e e e e e e e e e e e e te e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e In O O O ri m R N1 O h rl O M h h V; Vr R P O N C O rl N M1 h O r-O�P m ri 0 1 m M h r N} R eC M P$ It V r n N r1 n 0 Im+��0 0 0 VN1 O ff$G Q r C �M C O O r N hOD,IMn O O Vmj,M b O C N D�G 7 t0 rl N P O O R C r h O r r•O V1 P r0 O M m m P •G O C cF ^1 o R.-c u-rry !c vy - rier ..� vrn o ICd vl N Q F.. h l .f p a M p O C R, O M O P vmj f l G .G ano O S P h r!v M S O Vm1 rmn N S C ...1 I N M rl r- 7 M m Vj�7'P R crr011 O N R P !�GO OO y r1C S�C O�M o0 rl P O Q 0 0 In.p O M1 O f 1` l m dr INi.R of Vj V O O 0 0 T F YI h O S G S O O C O O C S vNi 0 0 0 7 C S O O C C S S OI S O W poo 00 .on m.oP $coccop o oJ"i.+�$w$ccooln r V o o v 0 R •-a.D n C M v O _�,�� RR �^ nr=o a Mri o�v+i rf as Vi V mtiri ri -i � CO N N r! C � � W � � I pp V01 M m Iil O C$CpO r$ N g r O C$t-m Voi rw�t aco S O P O n O S U C O O M1 n �h N rml.N.W C O yOj O N OI O m 0� O h O VOl rf'O1 P�OM r 0 h Il O N •'�O '� VI - - - yi `• In fS-'7 z pp p p p '•� 0 0 h m m m P w IO O O O O S S CI O rl S rl O O O m rn VOj m r eNo^Oj O C O N S O N O O C G C�D C rV1 O M O C D O` O n P M.C O rl O .M.•i 66 le 14 U R d!Vry' vl CM N rr�i Nip lO 4 ev.P•�, oS$$�'$,�S�,ocSScoS`Bo a So W 5od poo wPYi 000d000- 'duo - oor:000006 0 od V F N Vl o a v e O N M M M t` 6^n'N�f C V Vl I+!O M nj O n N ri Vl L O t�j R' f�j G fN C C Inv! �o�o �o IOM1 Mao rn c roMMonrn aRM -•�eM inno �o o o 0 o c o -o o N o 0 oe o0 oa ..v ooG oocc0000..ccc o0000cog m In In �w o� oo rS Inn d00000=ccc69 �jor clv0000000e5 u r In IO Q O O O O O G C O O I!1 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 V! N N nM.o o. olnaoev;P Iy.fYM1�` �D�n000a No Io er2M 7 N O In O Vl w r O ti ti N .�.r P R M S N b R �D VI N ff 0 ri ID n IL m -n In - •-• '� M w E e, u U o o u 3 c c oO I.m gBF�+ � d.� � Fna� uEo3YSo�a! Fv z, mt+� � Y 43'd N o b o `U Io, !v. u ✓Z o c U S U n a o'd o U ° •-�� o c v In c �, V u ram. b u u Vl b r"u 1tl r o �+. '� ed fG+ 4. V 4 W o 3 0 o r+v N tu u a o n 8 .f O %€ v g_ 6 2 n a•` �_ 13 ttQQ F F N 1..F-W v c 0 o .c=L W o u u c g o o `L S 3 O cn b l-fX !Ow C C a Q m()U N'tL �1 0 W 0 e Y a w c C co c o n u .o o c o c A a 4 uEi m' e e e e e e e e e e e, e e � n nTaoPo Smtvo c a C�a gn viONc��S h w� �� OPC r •• U[�r-r fV N t`C C d'O r`O C C a0 O O •G r•-m-O o O O � - C N �WCWC pp ryr1 ?N O Q O S m 0 b 6 P O S a S P N b C D C 6 . � v r O V'1�G r 1 rry h i Qvl! p �v� v lm�ry NN Qvl Nn U P h M h.-• W--^1� M v_ . N yl — �N Q Q M Vl^ry.. V 7 } Wrl MIClp ^or•lo obor Wpmm ro — b Wm c b O^rl vl O G O Q O —S Vl-�O N r•O N O�M O r h b O O S S S O Vl }�Q M �fi' rl.Q-• M M M M < 00 .pSp rP'1 M O O O aWO C�O p�O G vOi O O N O O O r+?O O IQI O N O O O S O eM�1 ((W 1�h aP0 O•m0 O rPi Q N r O^00 R M W Q O vPf 0b0 OOD O CO a CF M � b r+d• O Vl Y1 M Q C QI b e e e e o e ay� \ o D opp o g e e a ea{{c o 0 0 e a U C`� 'V lV N C C C fV 0 OO O OO Q 0000600 ,j N � p p p C Gr-!S SS n O'o 1?00 S r1ho00o O O S o 0 O S OOSO r Y•� V i C rn I V 0 0 O -O O o 0 r - 0 0 0 Q 0 C G O O C O C C P M vl.-W ap Vf N O v v b N o Q d N a W Fx- � z 0 �--! ai�gcBgSaSSi�SSooSS�r.'�,SSSSSSc': SS $SaS a C P T O P Q O O 0 0 o d 0 C C!0 0 0 0 J O Q r-: O C .- 4 p pp p N O O �O O O p 0 N W'1S�' h r r C 0000 -0000 C�n OOC 06C 6O rC OOO Q�•.�pO o.M^bD Yob^)eMIVfl COeQVSI ooMPQP-O.eOO=e Oa o ey1`Il b0e0 o 0O 0O o Qe yc!o a a penm eO e ePr• v^e.-. OoO aO0ON m g m QM OOOO q m O Oi Q O O OS4 0 C O Q VI ISI'S ' b O Q n r•O rl O pry+Q b V1 W O W N N O ry O W O C m Q b 0 0 0 0 0 N O 0 0 0 0 0 Q pp N O O O W O m Vl Q �O !fl O O!fj O C O.O O O O O O N O P O O O C C O m Q r r-b V,C G C C r;O C C O O C op C.+ C cs N O N M T P P a O lP�f R Q V 000 m m pp O Q O O O P O O 4 Q W b ^O O e•�{� r f`1.-. N b M M Vl M b b w m m Q N ^t m C C O O � 2 C O O j y y N cN_ F y '� O u� CO O• y c �a E�c o•� � # k Yi t W 'c ~ c i � aci rJ u E U w E e t-. �r E med a a, in x Y! o s VU o m V o a R ° OG A UUoW� a yu, c pu� � �! G Y Y � �v� uC1 � W a•taoo� � Q � vu_i '6u k �f', o, v �° ro Yl'�C p S o O L o 9 O _ rQv �ari � x530a Q rUj ~ F _I 0 s 5 c � - c c u � .O �'• 3 'O f0! O 0) o e C' U x E �q w V]F o a o 0 0 o v e v e s o o e e o 0 0 a a> e o a e 'oT ncMm-'o v,mT� ox�co.• rvQ`oc -^ v) cPPamo Nw .a.o•o.00c - .^.c mvi ri.n v,a �n .•� - Ov.o �n� ooc - -� to}Ncy�r i ri.6o aor-:oPo ro�..o.'go..S 000�iQ� olP+1�c�MP?' cr^ vim o."og S:�P n' r 7 p qq pp y1 O b CMD.OD O S Q •O N M1 n O N C O O vOj N a N O� N m I�S S O h S r Q Q r O = a M; —V' o.+i vi oOM .p r:Q-� C)o Vi ri.c j.fi r 1^i Vi.G.Co viOvi o Geri oh oD uqN ary �ao mMVI„)OPOO .O Ism oo.m .oMQ vlor- •-cr.� m .OQ rar r1P •-M;acrl 1: •- .- oN.�-`rv• .rin .on vrn.nN p .p h Q .O•-. .r.,l v Q N `�CI ` ry V m^i._..4 J a� .OaC SSvPI � .D rQiP voi�Or�a00./OI rIONQO.tT�aQo 1�dGO�IPrI 1-rMi dO•P rio .O M�G M M�OO .O�ri W I+j M h T - W P O 1/t 1 O O��r•�h O O V)O T ri o rat O'vl a0 CO �J� n m'af n _ a^ T •D—•�.O T rl rl O'Q Q .O y�O •• r!.p �n Q x 1!1 Q � • N M S S m an0 P Q O C G O C C O S C Q S O S S h O Q S O S S S C S O S�O O S S O O C w q.c o ri m o o S S S S Ss o c o"S o:o c o o c a'S o�'S S o $g o S S S U ti T ri_ruo SNTN�o m - oo.o mQT mQ N�noo P .o.�. O� d oon _rrr; ao - d ri- o d-'i ri ui e m e o o c e a e e e e e o e o e e n a a o o e e e e e e e Q 4J N O T N O O O Q O O Vl O O M O O M„1 p 4` O O m e o o ap e�at O a V•C m C �D.OJ O O n O O N M O O O q T M ��`J$4Y `� �do4u_�o�nn�o�000no�woo• �dSo�oo_000'^ ���SSn '^ �nv'iriyoSCS.-nq�cnMo�SSS Leo.ngS S�.'O'.SSSS S vi u'�^on�rP,�%woorlr cIonwc�000°,��IS�9iov'Oivi`ci `oaQ� "'InnooSOM M I r v — Ix- z rr11 pp.. oq O N CO O O.•+ r,N O.P O U O O o v 0 0 et O C�O.'^ j P G O O O C O O L C y B OO Q C cM•1 O O;O P m N m e0 CI T �C rl U C7 cMcaln�c0000�r`�voinc„o,00�0000Sovoioo S�ovoicco SScaS _ CI N L �e�y e a a 0 0 0 0 o O e e e e s�o •� �o O a e e e e ovvvv o s e o o a e a p O o 0 m O Q CI N O .++••a Op P 00 O .+M O A 1!)N M P P O r O b O R N e��l 0 0 m N n nO�D�M o n ryncoocnoP MO . JJ o acn r; Qo via x acor d.eria.ev g C,0 4 o � ^ s o•q'm �1�laoo m - .O O�O.O�O VI R N In N T P C 1/1 m n�O VI•D N O O P 06 V f•1 P O e•1 0 o ao o v o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.e o o c o Q o c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o n o a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 aoc.c.-:aoo oo oo 0000.-:oo0oe�i000000p00000: 000000 c .D O C 0 0 0 �•Q Q Vi P O Ifi O M�D M Q O N �O 1I� O O Q O N�O .O N.O M Iry O N N O li Q'A 00 m M N x y� a U uu!! Co C ua O pp,,O O ..] O, O `l W a i0 C 2 L G p• U 3 �.aPmE Qo~ ucE m � o Ta c 6 U o c E' m � c = S G.G c• w y 'c u a• E i c n In c a F a Q U u a�Y�[u c F• E yp Fp s° w a,O c E p pd _ vl E u vl 0. O V)Vl ly/Q 1 u n'O—.0 G C �1..3 8 .q•W .d= V•b'O V ❑ a� o F w U $ c o s E F o c-u = v u u E 'c c ° C I��a. a�Fxg30wm'v1wU F0.'.'L w`xu.aoeo:tw uU ;;,a lninUxi" d 0 a 0 0 g 7 Ed u eeeae eeeeSi ee e G�c�'_rycj°O Nry 4og� rr: W v 0000,�nn oo �ooP S8 M 1 �V^� h �O C e'• M y C C f?-•' R'`I O W Q I F ,J q -�n rnN So opSo �o c Q O_-4 rl rri S Ocp pSpSo as Sp�p�pS '$o � O C O C C S O O 0 0 S O o N O R O Q O O Q [Q M e O O Opp O O�S p il e s e C� O C..�o o R Q C C O o S G T W .- > O O O O G �.$o corn? �m ooco Sa a F>. z o p , O O O OO O O Wo a O C C F O O O O O S O S S S O 0 0 P O O O m M "W O Z GC N N O O O P C C O •p O R Q N r• N N 41 O D N<.O Vl 1/1 Q �O O O r• e O O O O O 0 0 O O O pp O O C O O C O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 R o o c o d 9 S 0 0 0 0 0 o a Q eee 0 oe oo .o iV- o00o ax v oe oo � w W O C O u Y OL ..�. •umu m _ v�13 N a e a �-• --F Cam. r� ��nUOL M V1 a Z � MU F ml Y O N a u .1y J V C 7 N A OL C E c �c. 0 U � � o c C v c 1 q c u e e e o e a e o o e e e e e e epp e e-g./ e e,4�,a ee e e e e o ep a o N 6 P�n vMi ry S Vl r S h S h on! O Q,r•Oi,,O�D °S Y�P p, O G O O O p aOC ONO 1`O M S P rNn rl O A?�rl p O qM 0 O O W I rl N n O O O O of M Yi V r,O P •O p h I O a f!Vi O O p C, U o W^ M O W ^ r '-N Vl P —O• r Vl P s H c Fear V R— o rn Ell 7 .. O F ?' .o�n r.O�oonApr oK RPrv,nroo,n•o R!-,ov•n o, o p p o p N M C^ •O Ci•D N^_ R O ni C �i r�i r oo ss<yy TQ,D O C C C O P Q Q ry r M ern r�•I rNn, n 1�'!ri♦T ao c�0 O .r. ro R OI V� D O P v!N UQ p pp p o O O °R �0 0 p 0 0�/?S SV,O� O O fy O o0 S 8 G •D S O S O O N b }T b N�rY R �- •- r!.• rri,G ri � Oro rM-! a e e e p e e e a o y t r S O O,n S CP P i r4 0 O O C O O O^! �!,O N O P q O S S O� �• O G `- O IA/i r WC 1O G Gam.' �. e! 7 po p v N N m Yi C ORO,S O y O m S oG O Q O Q ry O ry M O S S!P+! O O O O S la al o _ ..rrff pp -� �N r°•n vrvi fj �0 0 R G A O OMO,P rn O O M O O,°G 0 4 •O O C O S O � N � G N V�O GO P O O=O$O tAn m r O O n 0 0 C O O � C O O O O O• N F� O^. �W- N R r �. O• N Vj U 2m,rl A y M 4 p p a{ pp o F O OrSrSSSS00 G C OO~O,OOoS C�i rl rl C LuSooMM.o•oddodoocacdcPd,cr.^. o M d o d 0C oc o On m r N P f-0 N S�- rf r M m e e e o e a e u e o s e e e e o c e e e e e a e e a e o e e e m Vi O N N O h•T O O O M 0 0 0 O P V: VI O 00•1 Vl O O O O G .O Q O Op P P 0 0 N O HS O O T 00 O ^ ,O N h O O O O P C O P1 !A O h O•D .• N nl O^ f,V 00 N M N 0 .O+ ,n b � e pp pp N S O O, O C C O S loll 0 0 iIl S S DNO O r rPr1.S O O•D O ci O O G r•�,r O•O rl `O 0 0 0 O M.j j 0O •D O O "Q A O r 0C r O N O OD N S O C A V� N N 0 u w Z a � v U U b y 4' S v •A � Z p O O U U e O G. r°-s U u a.9 o G w m ra v a � �Uc°i me ouc 9iim _°. , F e 2'v ° E u w C U3Z2Uwm.2w1! �wr[adn:x� THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM 6 AGENDA ITEM: New Single Family Home Permit Report SUBMITTED BY: Rick Chase, Building Official THROUGH: Rick Chase, Building Official REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.............................................................. City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator - Questions from Council to Staff..............................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion............................................................... Mayor& City Council - Discussion....................................................................... Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.....................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to accept the monthly new single family home permit report for through August, 2014. No specific motion is needed as this is recommended as part of the Consent Agenda. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/BACKGROUND INFORMATION: 2014 2013 2012 New Homes 17 23 20 Total valuation $10,018,471 $10,553,454 $9,351,112 Average home value 589,321 458,845 467,000 RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends the City Council accept the August, 2014 monthly building permit report. --page 1 -- THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM# 7 AGENDA ITEM: Monthly Assessor Report SUBMITTED BY: Dan Raboin, City Assessor THROUGH: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Finance Committee SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.............................................................. City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator - Questions from Council to Staff..............................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion............................................................... Mayor& City Council - Discussion....................................................................... Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.....................................................................Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to accept the monthly assessor report for through August 2014 outlining work performed on behalf of the City of Lake Elmo. No specific motion is needed as this is recommended as part of the Consent Agenda. LEGISLATIVE HISTORYIBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Property splits/plats—0 Sales collected and viewed— 16 Taxpayer inquiries—3 Miscellaneous inquiries - 7 Inspections — Residential — 0; Commercial — 16 (No residential inspections in August as they were completed early for 2015 quintile reviews) Building permit reviews—62 Pictures taken—21 Other work performed included: • Completed 2015 residential quintile --page 1 -- i City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 7] September 16,2014 • Monthly meeting with County residential and commercial supervisors • Input of all inspection and permit work • Perform sales verifications and land value analysis using MLS and other resources • Field telephone inquiries RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends the City Council accept the August 2014 monthly assessor report. --page 2-- TI It:CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM # 8 AGENDA ITEM: Pumphouse No. 4— Pay Request No. 4 SUBMITTED BY: Chad Isakson, Project Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Cathy Bendel, Finance Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Agenda): - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate........................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Engineering FISCAL IMPACT: None. Partial payment is proposed in accordance with the Contract for the project. Payment remains within the authorized scope and budget. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Pay Request No. 4 for the Pumphouse No. 4 project. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 4 to Total Mechanical Services, Inc. in the amount of $57,028.50 for Pumphouse No. 4". --page I -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 8] September 16,2014 LEGISLATIVE HISTORYBACKGROUND INFORMATION: Total Mechanical Services Inc., the Contractor for the project, has submitted Partial Pay Estimate No. 4 in the amount of$57,028.50. The request has been reviewed and payment is recommended in the amount requested. In accordance with the contract documents, the City has retained 5% of the total work completed. The amount retained is $12,573.30. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council consider approving, as part of the Consent Agenda, Pay Request No. 4 for the Pumphouse No. 4 project. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 4 to Total Mechanical Services,Inc. in the amount of $57,028.50,for Pumphouse No. 4". ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Partial Pay Estimate No. 4 -- page 2 -- PROJECT PAY FORM c PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 4 FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. PUMPHOUSE NO. 4 PERIOD OF ESTIMATE PROJECT NO,2013.132 FROM 8/1/2014 TO 8/31/2014 PROJECT OWNER: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF LAKE ELMO TOTAL MECHANICAL SERVICES, INC. 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH 420 BROADWAY AVE LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 ST.PAUL, MN 55071 ATTN:JACK GRIFFIN, P,E,,CITY ENGINEER ATTN: MARK DIESSNER CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY PAY ESTIMATE SUMMARY No. Approval Amount 1.Original Contract Amount $748,640.00 Date Additions Deductions 2.Net Change Order Sum $0.00 3.Revised Contract(1+2) $748,640.00 4. *Work Completed $251,466.00 5. *Stored Materials $0.00 6.Subtotal (4+5) $251,466.00 7.Retainage` 5.0% $12,573.30 8.Previous Payments $181,864.20 TOTALS $0.00 $0.00 9.Amount Due(6-7-8) $57,028,50 NET CHANGE $0 00 *Detailed Breakdown Attached CONTRACT TI M E START DATE: 5/19/2014 ORIGINAL DAYS 186 ON SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: 10/17/2014 REVISED DAYS 0 YES FINAL COMPLETION: 11/21/2014 REMAINING 82 NO ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: FOCUS Engineering,inc. The undersigned certifies that the work has been reviewed and to the W best of their knowledge and belief,the quantities shown in this estimate are correct and the work has been performed in accordance ENGINEER with the contract documents. q / rZO t J DATE r _l CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: CONTRACTOR The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of their knowledge, information and belief the work covered by this paymentrq '10/1 estimate has been completed in accordance with the contract By documents,that all amounts have been paid by the contractor for work for which previous payment estimates was issued and payments — 1 received from the owner,and that current payment shown herein is DATE now due. APPROVED BY OWNER: CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MINNESOTA BY BY DATE DATE FOCUS Engineering,inc. PROJECT PAYMENT FORM PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO, 4 PUMPHOUSE NO.4 FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.2013.132 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF PAY ITEM UNIT CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 1 DIV 1-GENERAL CONDITIONS LS 1 $60,000.00 560,000.00 0.17 $10,200.00 0.68 $40,800.00 2 DIV 1-MOBILIZATION LS 1 $10.000.00 $10,000.00 - $0.00 1.00 $1D,000.00 3 DIV 2-SITE WORK LS 1 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 - $0.00 0,96 $43,200.00 4 DIV 3-CONCRETE LS 1 $30,000.00 $30,000.00 0.25 $7,500.00 0.92 $27,600.00 5 DIV 4-MASONRY LS 1 $59,000.00 $59,000.00 0.25 $14,750.00 1.00 $59,00D.00 6 DIV 5-METALS LS 1 $3,000.00 $3,000.00 - $o.op 0.17 5510.00 7 DIV 6-CARPENTRY LS 1 $19,000.00 $19,000.00 - $D.00 0.80 $15,200.00 8 DIV 7-THERMAL PROTECTION LS 1 513,000.00 $13,000.00 - $0.00 0.23 $2,990.00 9 DIV 8-DOORS AND WINDOWS LS 1 $12,000.00 $12,000.00 - $0.00 0.34 54,080.00 10 DIV 9-FINISHES LS 1 $10,000.00 $10,000.00 $0.00 - $0.00 11 DIV 10-SAFETY AND SIGNS LS 1 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 - $0.00 - $0.00 12 DIV 11-PROCESS EQUIPMENT LS 1 $60,000.00 $60,000.00 - -$0.00 $0.00 13 DIV 15-MECHANICAL LS 1 $137,900.00 $137,900.00 0.20 $27,580.00 0.34 $46,886.00 14 DIV 16-ELECTRICAL LS 1 - $243,000.00 $243,000.00 $0.00 - $0.00 15 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CY 350 $11.00 $3,850.00 - $0.00 $0.00 16 TYPE SP.12.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 12,B) TN 130 $108.00 $14,040.00 - $0.00 - 50.00 17 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 35 $6.00 $210.00 - $0.00 - $0.00 18 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5,100%CRUSHED TN 190 520.00 53,800.00 $0.00 - $0.00 19 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(MODIFIED) TN 380 513.50 $5,130.00 - $0.00 - $0.00 20 S"CONCRETE SIDEWALK SF 235 $5.00 $1,175.00 - $0.00 $0.00 21 TRUNCATED DOME PANELS SF 8 $40.00 $320.00 - $0.00 - $D.DD 22 TOPSOIL BORROW(CV) CY 15 $65.00 $975.00 - $0.00 50.130 23 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE EA 1 $1,000.00 $1,000.00 - $0.00 $0.00 24 SILT FENCE,MACHINE SLICED LF 400 $3.00 $1,200.00 - $0.00 400.0 $1,200.00 25 STREET SWEEPER HR 4 $110.00 $440.00 $0.00 - $0.00 26 SOD SY 2,400 $4.00 $9,600.00 - -$0.00 $0.00 TOTALS-BASE CONTRACT $748,640.00 $60,030.00 $251,466.00 THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM # 9 AGENDA ITEM: Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements—Pay Request No. 2 SUBMITTED BY: Chad Isakson, Project Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Cathy Bendel, Finance Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS if removed from the Consent Agenda): Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate........................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council Action on Motion....................................................................Mayor Facilitates I POLICY RECOMMENDER: Engineering FISCAL IMPACT: None. Partial payment is proposed in accordance with the Contract for the project. Payment remains within the authorized scope and budget. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Pay Request No. 2 for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements project. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 2 to GM Contracting Inc in the amount of$395,509.31,for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements Project" --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 9] September 16,20.14 LEGISLATIVE HISTORYBACKGROUND INFORMATION: GM Contracting Inc., the Contractor for the project, has submitted Partial Pay Estimate No. 2 in the amount of$395,509.31. The request has been reviewed and payment is recommended in the amount requested. In accordance with the contract documents, the City has retained 5% of the total work completed. The amount retained is $61,494.05. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council consider approving, as part of the Consent Agenda, Pay Request No. 2 for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements project. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 2 to GM Contracting Inc. in the amount of$395,509.31, for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements Project" ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Partial Pay Estimate No. 2 --page 2-- PROJECT PAY FORM PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS PERIOD OF ESTIMATE PROJECT NO,2013.133 FROM 8/1/2014 TO 8/31/2014 PROJECT OWNER: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF LAKE ELMO GM CONTRACTING INC. 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH 19810 515TH AVE LAKE ELMO,MN 55042 LAKE CRYSTAL, MN 56055 ATTN:JACK GRIFFIN,CITY ENGINEER ATTN:MIKE URBAN,PROJECT MANAGER CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER SUMMARY PAY ESTIMATE SUMMARY No. Approval Amount 1.Original Contract Amount $2,015,687.39 Date Additions Deductions 2. Net Change Order Sum $0.00 3. Revised Contract(1+2) $2,015,687.39 4. *Work Completed $1,165,235.51 S. 'Stored Materials $64,645.50 6.Subtotal (4+5) $1,229,881,01 7. Retainage" S.i $61,494.05 8. Previous Payments $772,877.65 TOTALS $0.00 $0.00 9.Amount Due(6-7-8) $395,509.31 NET CHANGE $0.00 '._y_;":" i; 'Detailed Breakdown Attached CONTRACT TIME START DATE: 6/26/2014 ORIGINAL DAYS 141 ON SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: 10/17/2014 REVISED DAYS 0 YES FINAL COMPLETION: 11/14/2014 REMAINING 75 NO a ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: FOCUS Engineering,inc. The undersigned certifies that the work has been reviewed and to the best of their knowledge and belief,the quantities shown in this estimate are correct and the work has been performed in accordance ENGINEER with the contract documents. 9/2/2014 DATE CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: CONTRACTOR The undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of their knowledge,information and belief the work covered by this payment ' /� estimate has been completed in accordance with the contract BY documents,that all amounts have been paid by the contractor for work for which previous payment estimates was issued and payments DATE received from the owner,and that current payment shown herein is now due. APPROVED BY OWNER: CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA BY BY DATE DATE FOCUS Engineering,inc. PROJECT PAYMENT FORM PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 �4rgB, I LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS FOCUS ENGINEERING, Inc. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.2013.133 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF PAY ITEM UNIT CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT DIVISION 1-GENERAL 1 MOBILIZATION L5 1 $85,000.DO $85,000.00 0.25 $21,250.00 0.75 $63,750.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $53,952.69 $53,951.69 0.25 $13,487.92 0.75 $40,463.77 3 SILT FENCE LF 462 $2.S0 $1,152.50 0.00 $0.00 D $0.00 4 TREE REMOVAL EA 20 $400.00 $8,000.00 6.00 $2,400.00 6 $2,400.00 5 INLET PROTECTION EA 3 $152.53 $457.74 3.00 S457.74 3 $457.74 6 6"TOPSOIL AND SOD SY 267 $6.30 $1,682.10 0.00 $O.OD D $0.00 7 TEMPORARY WATER SERVICE LS 1 S4,500DO $4,500-00 0.75 $3.375.OD 1 $3.37SD0 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 1 $154.744.03 $40,970.66 $110,446.51 DIVISION 2-WATERMAIN I REMOVE EXISTING WATERMAIN-ALL SIZES AND TYPES LF 416 $2.85 $1.185.50 0 $0.00 0 SO.OD 2 ABANDON EXISTING WATERMAIN IN PLACE-ALL SIZES AND TYPES LF 970 $2.85 $2,764.50 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 3 SALVAGE EXISTING HYDRANT,LEAD.AND VALVE EA 2 $350.DO $700.00 0 $0.o0 0 $0.00 4 REMOVE/ABANDON EXISTING WATER SERVICE-ALL SIZES AND TYPES EA 15 $150.00 $2,2S0.D0 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN EA 1 $1.449.16 $1.448.16 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 6 6"GATE VALVE&BOX EA 27 $2,036.85 $54.994.95 1 $2.036.85 1 $2,036.85 7 8"GATE VALVE&BOX EA 4 52,530.54 $10.222.16 D 50.00 D $0.00 8 12"GATE VALVE&BOX EA 1 $3,508.66 $3,508.66 0 $0.00 0 MIX) 9 16"BUTTERFLY VALVE&BOX EA 17 $3,489.56 $59,322.52 0 $O.DD D So,00 SO HYDRANT-8'-6"BURY EA 27 $4,182.48 $112,926.96 1 $4,182.48 1 $4,182.48 11 1"CORPORATION STOP EA 6 $425.90 $2,555.40 0 $D.DO 0 $0.00 12 1.5"CORPORATION STOP EA 38 $550.20 $20,907.60 0 $0.00 0 SO.00 13 2"CORPORATION STOP EA 2 $647,35 51,294.70 0 $OAO 0 SO.OD 14 V CURB STOP AND BOX EA 6 $463.53 $2,781.49 0 S0.00 0 $0.00 15 1.5"CURB STOP AND BOX EA 38 $600.53 $22.820.14 0 $0.00 0 $O.OB 16 I"CURB STOP AND BOX EA 2 $746.85 $1.493.70 D MOO 0 50.OD 17 1"TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE LF 204 $28.59 $5.832.36 0 $0.00 0 SDAO 18 1.5"TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE LF 1.586 532.06 $50,947.16 0 $O.OD 0 $0.00 19 2"TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE LF 52 $37.35 $1,942.20 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 20 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER SERVCIE-ALL SIZES AND TYPES EA 15 $5DO.00 $7,500.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 21 6"DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LF 379 $29.50 $11,180.50 39 $1,150.50 39 $1,150.50 22 16"DIP CL 52 WATERMAIN LF 307 $74.63 $28,892.31 0 $0.00 0 $DOO 23 B"HOPE DR 11 WATERMAIN LP 174 $70.93 $12,341.82 45 $3,191.85 45 $3,192.85 24 12"HOPE DR 11 WATERMAIN LF 74 $81.80 $6,053.20 74 56,053.20 74 $6,053.20 25 16"HOPE DR 11 WATERMAIN LF 12.152 $89.00 $992,529.00 6,124 $545,036.00 10,452 $930,228.00 26 16"HOPE DRII WATERMAIN,EXTRA DEPTH JP) LF 2,200 $89.00 $195,800.00 550 $48,950.00 1,125 $100,125.00 27 6"X45"BEND MI DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 32 $362.03 $11,594.95 0 $O.OD D $0.00 28 IWX11-1/4-BEND MI DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 1 $1,325.00 $1,325.00 0 50.OD 0 50.00 29 16"X45'BEND Ml DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 2 $1,337.00 $2,674.00 0 $0.00 D $0.00 30 8"X6"TEE Ml DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FIRING EA 3 $543.52 $1.630.56 1 $543.52 1 $543.52 31 16"X6"TEE MI DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 73 $1,498,00 $34,454.00 0 50.00 0 SODO 32 16"XB"TEE MU DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 4 51,520.00 $6,080.00 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 33 16"X12"TEE Ml DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 1 $1,589.00 $1,589.00 0 S0.00 0 $0.00 34 16"X12"CROSS NO DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 2 S3,657.77 $3.315.54 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 35 12"X6"REDUCER Ml DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 3 $588.30 $588.10 0 $0.00 0 $0.00 36 16"X8"REDUCER MI DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 1 $762.51 5762.51 0 $0.00 O $0.00 37 8"PLUG Ml DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 4 $268.40 $1,073.60 1 $268.4D 1 5268AD 38 12"PLUG MI DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FIRING EA 4 $322.24 $1.298.96 0 SO.DD 0 $0.00 39 16"PLUG M7 DUCTILE IRON COMPACT FITTING EA 1 $506.18 $506.18 0 $O.OD 0 $000 40 HORIZONTAL DIRECTIONAL DRILLING BORE PITS LS 1 $70.092.00 $70,092.00 0 $7.009.20 0 $7,009.20 41 WATER SERVICE CONNECTION PITS LS 1 $55,577.00 $55,577,00 D $0.00 u $0.00 42 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER EA 27 S57.70 $1,SST90 0 50.00 0 $0.00 43 4"POLYSTYRENE INSULATION SF 96 $7.37 $70T52 0 $0.00 0 S0.00 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 2 $1,808.790.41 $618,422.00 $1,054,789.00 DIVISION 3-STREETS I SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 11020 $3-92 $3.998.40 O SO.D0 0 S0.00 2 REMOVE&DISPOSE OF EXIST.BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT,ALL TYPES SY 1,125 $5.67 $6,379.75 0 50.DO 0 $0.00 3 CL S AGGREGATE BASE TN 410 $29.93 $12,271.30 0 $0.00 0 50.00 4 DRIVEWAY RESTORATION SY 62 539.21 52.431.02 D $O.00 0 So.oO 5 SPNW02300 BITUMINOUS NON-WEAR COURSE,STREETS TN 134 $128.96 $17,280.64 0 $0.00 0 SOAD 6 SPWEA2408 BITUMINOUS WEAR COURSE,STREETS TN 67 $144.44 $9,677.48 0 50.00 0 MOO 7 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GA 56 $2.06 $115.36 D $0.00 0 $0.00 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 3 $52.252.95 $0.00 $0.00 TOTALS $2,015,697.39 $659,392.66 $1,165,235.51 THE CITY of LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: Scptember 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM # 10 AGENDA ITEM: 2014 Street Improvements—Pay Request No. 2 SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Stempski, Project Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Cathy Bendel, Finance Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Agenda): - Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate........................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Engineering FISCAL IMPACT: None. Partial payment is proposed in accordance with the Contract for the project. Payment remains within the authorized scope and budget. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Pay Request No. 2 for the 2014 Street Improvements project. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 2 to Hardrives, Inc. in the amount of$427,922.74,for the 2014 Street Improvements". --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 101 September 16,2014 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Hardrives, Inc., the Contractor for the project, has submitted Partial Pay Estimate No. 2 in the amount of $427,922.74. The request has been reviewed and payment is recommended in the amount requested. In accordance with the contract documents, the City has retained 5% of the total work completed. The amount retained is $28,680.09. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council consider approving, as part of the Consent Agenda, Pay Request No. 2 for the 2014 Street Improvements. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Pay Request No. 2 to Hardrives, Inc. in the amount of$427,922.74,for the 2014 Street Improvements' ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Partial Pay Estimate No. 2 --page 2-- PROJECT PAY FORM PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO, 2 FOCUS ENGINEERING, Inc. 2014 STREET IMPROVEMENTS PERIOD OF ESTIMATE PROJECT NO.2013.135 FROM 8/1/2014 TO 8/31/2014 PROJECT OWNER: CONTRACTOR: CITY OF LAKE ELMO HARDRiVES,INC. 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH 14478 QUIRAM DRIVE LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 ROGERS,MN 55374 ATTN:JACK GRIFFIN,CITY ENGINEER ATTN:DAN LOBELLO,PROJECT MANAGER CONTRA&CHAN_.6_E.ORDER SUMMARY PAY ESTIMATE SUMMARY - No. Approval Amount 1.Original Contract Amount $1,469,015.70 Date Additions Deductions 2.Net Change Order Sum $7,988.30 1 7/1/2014 $7,988.30 3.Revised Contract(1+2) $1,477,004.00 4. *Work Completed $573,601.80 5.*Stored Materials $0.00 6.Subtotal(4+5) $573,601.80 7.Retainage* 5.0% $28,680.09 8.Previous Payments $116,998.97 TOTALS $7,988.30 $0.00 9.Amount Due(6-7-8) $427,922.74 NETCHANGE $7,988.30 `Detailed Breakdown Attached CONTRACTIVE,——. START DATE: 7/2/2014 ORIGINAL DAYS 142 ON SCHEDULE SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION: 10/10/2014 REVISED DAYS 0 YES 7X FINAL COMPLETION: 11/21/2014 REMAINING 82 NO F7 ENGINEER'S CERTIFICATION: FOCUS Engineering,inc. The undersigned certifies that the work has been reviewed and to the _ best of their knowledge and belief,the quantities shown in this estimate are correct and the work has been performed in accordance ENGINEER with the contract documents, a DATE 1 CONTRACTOR'S CERTIFICATION: aC�TORThe undersigned Contractor certifies that to the best of their knowledge,information and belief the work covered by this payment estimate has been completed in accordance with the contract documents,that all amounts have been paid by the contractor for work for which previous payment estimates was issued and payments received from the owner,and that current payment shown herein is DATE now due. APPROVED BY OWNER: CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MINNESOTA BY BY DATE DATE FOCUS Engineering,inc. PROJECT PAYMENT FORM PARTIAL PAY ESTIMATE NO. 2 2014 STREET IMPROVEMENTS FOCUS ENGINEERING, Inc. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MINNESOTA PROJECT NO.2013.135 ITEM DESCRIPTION OF PAY ITEM UNIT REVISED CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT DIVISION 1-PACKARD PARK AREA 1 MOBILIZATION L5 1 $34,750.00 $34,750.00 0.50 $17,375.00 1 $34,750.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,162.47 $2,162.47 0.40 $864.99 0.50 $1,081.24 3 SILT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LS 3,188 $2.03 $6,471.64 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 4 INLET PROTECTION EA 14 $74.93 $1,049.02 14.00 $1,049.02 34.00 51,049.02 5 SIOROLL DITCH CHECK EA 14 $80.28 $1,123.92 0,00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 6 STREET SWEEPING FIR 35 $151.26 $5.294.10 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 7 TREE TRIMMING LS 1 $5.352.13 $5,352.13 0.00 $0.00 0.00 ,$0.00 8 SALVAGE MAILBOX EA 24 $32.44 $779.56 0.00 $0.p0 22.00 $713.68 9 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX EA 24 $37.84 $908.16 0.00 S0.00 0.00 $0.00 10 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 720 $2.12 $2,526.40 261.00 $553.32 261.00 $553.32 Il SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF 130 $3.13 $406.90 130,00 5406.90 130.00 $406.90 12 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IDRIVEWAYS) SY 410 $5.35 $2,193.50 230.00 $1,230.50 230.00 51,230.50 13 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT(DRIVEWAYS) SY 150 $8.56 $1,284.00 85.00 $727.60 85.00 5727.60 14 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT SY 10 $32.11 $321.10 0.00 $0.00 DAO $0.00 15 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 230 $10.91 $2,486.30 73.DO $789.13 230.00 $2,48630 16 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION-RECLAIM AREAS(N) CY 1,000 $9.10 $9,100.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 17 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(CV) CY 250 $14.13 $3,532.50 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 18 RECLAIM EXISTING BITUMINOUS AND BASE MATERIALS,B"DEPTH SY 21,500 $0.91 $19,565.00 21,500.00 $19,565.00 21,500.00 $19,565.00 19 HAUL EXCESS RECLAIMED MATERIAL OFF SITE(LV) CY 300 $8.62 $2,586.00 O,DO $0.00 0.00 $0.00 20 SUBGRADE PREPARATION OF RECLAIMED SURFACE RS 61 $324.76 $19,690.20 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 21 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)ISPNWA2308) TN 1,905 $60.76 $115,747.80 1,667.00 $101,286.92 1,667.00 $101,286.92 22 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)ISPWEA2408) TN 1,905 $62.64 $119,329.20 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 23 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 1,350 $1.96 $2,646.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 24 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 410 $20.11 $8,245.10 294.00 $5,912.34 294.00 $5,912.34 25 PATCH CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 150 $46.03 $6,904.50 113.00 $5,201.39 113.00 $5,201.39 26 SAW&SEAL STREET(40'INTERVALS) LF 2,900 $2.63 $7,569.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 27 B418 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER LF 7,660 $9.63 $73,765.80 7,642.00 $73,592.46 7,642,00 $73,592.46 28 CONCRETE RIBBON CURB LF 530 $14.50 $7,68S.00 485.00 $7,032.50 485.00 $7,032.50 29 6"CONCRETE FLUME SF 500 $6.74 $3,370.00 370.00 $2,493.80 370.00 $2,493.80 30 REMOVE CB CASTING EA 12 $83.68 $1,004.16 12.OD $1,004.16 13.00 $1,087.84 31 R-32SO-2 CASTING EA 12 $779.82 $9,357.84 11.00 $8,578.02 11.00 $8,578.02 32 2'X T CATCH BASIN WITH CASTING PER DETAIL 404 EA 1 $1,938.10 $1,838.10 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 33 4'DIA CBMH WITH SUMP AND CASTING PER DETAIL 405 EA 1 $2,811.21 $2,911.21 1.00 $2.811.21 2.00 $5,622.42 34 4'DIA MH WITHCASTING PER DETAIL 407 EA 2 $1,946.23 $3,892.46 0,00 50.00 2.00 $3,892.46 35 15"RCP STORM SEWER,CLASS 5 LF 208 $44-33 $9,220.64 58.00 $2,571.14 209.00 $9,264.97 36 15"RCP FLARED END SECTION INCL TRASH GUARD EA 4 $1,243.42 $4,973.68 2.00 $2,486.84 3.00 $3,730.26 37 CLASS RIP RAP WITH FABRIC CY 8 $162.19 $1,297.52 5.00 $810.95 5.00 $810.95 38 DITCH GRADING LF ISO $10.70 $1,926.00 0.00 $0,00 0.00 $0.00 39 POND EXCAVATION IN) CY 70 $21.41 $1,499.70 0.00 SO.DO 0,00 $0.00 40 JET AND CLEAN STORM SEWER LF 135 $15.14 $2,043.90 0.00 $0.00 0,00 $0.00 41 IMPORT AND PLACE TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) LY goo $15.00 $12,ODMOO 182.00 $2,730.00 182,00 $2,730.00 42 SEEDING,FERTILIZER,AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 1,500 $2.94 $4,410.00 0.OD $0.00 0.00 $0.00 43 SODDING SY 8,800 $4.28 $37,664.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 44 SALVAGE SIGN EA 10 $27.03 $270.30 0.00 $0.00 1.00 $27.03 45 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN EA 10 $124.34 $1,243.40 0.00 $0.00 0.00 SUBTOTAL-DIVISIONI $561,296.21 $259,073.19 $293,826.92 DIVISION 2-20TH STREET NORTH 46 MOBILIZATION LS 0 $15,172.98 $0.00 0.00 SO.OD 0 $0.00 47 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 0 $5,000.00 $0.00 0.00 SO.DD 0 $O.OD 48 JOINT REPAIR SY 0 $20.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 49 PATCH BITUMINOUS STREET(PARTIAL DEPTH) SY 0 $20.00 SO.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 50 PATCH BITUMINOUS STREET(FULL DEPTH) SY 0 $38.64 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 O $0.00 51 REMOVE PAVEMENT MARKINGS-4"LINES LF 0 $0.65 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 O WOO 52 3/4"OVERLAY TN 0 $68.06 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0 SO.DO 53 3/8"MICROSURFACE 5Y 0 $3.21 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0 SO.DO 54 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING-100%CRUSHED LIMEROCK TN 0 $21.39 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 55 4"DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE-LATEX LF 0 $0.22 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 O $0.00 56 4"SOLID WHITE LINE-LATEX LF 0 50.11 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.D0 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 2 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 I ITEM DESCRIPTION OF PAY ITEM UNIT REVISED CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT DIVISION 3-DEER POND TRAIL&COURT 57 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $21,000.00 $21,000.00 0.25 55,250.00 1 $15,750.00 58 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $1,623.85 $1,621.85 0.40 564&74 1 $1,054.20 S9 SILT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LF 2,150 $2.03 $4,364.50 0.00 $O.Do 22S $456.75 60 INLET PROTECTION EA 12 $74.93 $899.16 0.00 $0.00 p $0.00 61 STREET SWEEPING HR 10 $151.26 $1,512.60 1.00 $151.26 1 $151.26 62 RIOROLL DITCH CHECK EA 5 $80.28 $401.40 p.Dp $D.Do 0 $0.00 63 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE EA 6 S588.73 $3,532.38 0.00 $0.00 7 $4,121.11 64 GRUB EXISTING STUMP EA 5 S214.09 $1,070.45 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 65 SALVAGE MAILBOX EA 22 $32.44 $713.68 0.00 $0.00 22 $713.68 66 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX EA 22 $37.84 $832.48 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 67 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 375 $2.17 $813.75 269.00 $583.73 269 $583.73 68 SAWCUT CONCRETE PAVEMENT LF 100 $4.07 $407.00 89.00 $362.23 89 $362.23 69 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 6,680 $2.91 $19,438.80 4,180.00 $12,163.80 6,680 $19,438.80 70 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT(DRIVEWAYS) SY 250 SS.35 $1,337.50 166.00 $888.10 266 $1,423A0 71 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING CONCRETE PAVEMENT(DRIVEWAYS) SY 110 $8.56 $941.60 37.00 $316.72 37 $316.72 72 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 190 $10.81 $2,053.90 0.00 $0.00 190 $2,053.90 73 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER STRUCTURE EA 2 $432.50 $865.00 0.00 $0.00 2 $965.00 74 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CY 3,575 $8.56 $30,602.00 3,575.00 $30,602.00 3,575 $30,602.00 75 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION-RECONSTRUCT AREAS(CV) CY 325 $8.56 $2,782.00 76.00 56SO.S6 76 $650.56 76 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW ICV) CY 2,390 S11.31 $29,420.90 2.227.00 $27,414.37 2227 $27,414.37 77 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS 5 TN 2,6DO $10.17 $26,442.00 2,GDo.00 $26,442.00 2,600 $26,442.00 78 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS NON WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)(SPNWA230B) TN 690 $62.38 $43,042.20 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 79 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)ISPWEA24081 IN 520 $63.49 $33,014.80 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 80 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 405 $1.96 S793.80 0.00 50.00 0 $0.00 81 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 250 $20.55 55,137.S0 0.00 $0.00 0 50.00 82 PATCH CONCRETE DRIVEWAY SY 110 $46.03 $5,063.30 60.00 $2,761.80 60 $2,761.80 83 PATCH GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TN 20 $27.54 $550,80 0.00 $0.00 D $0.00 84 SAW&SEAL STREET(40'INTERVALS) LF 1,300 $2.61 $3,393.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 85 ADJUST EXISTING MANHOLE CASTING EA 7 $584.98 $1,169.96 0.00 $D.ao p $0.00 86 0612 CONCRETE CURB&GUTTER LF 4,500 $9.10 $40,950.D0 0.00 $D.00 p $D.OD 87 6"CONCRETE FLUME 5F 2 $42.82 $85.64 0.00 $0.00 p $0.00 88 4"PVC PERF EDGE DRAIN W/BACKFILL&WRAP LF 1,155 $9.10 $10,510.50 11155.00 $10,510.50 1,155 $10,S10.5D 89 CONNECT DRAIN TILE TO STRUCTURE EA 12 $160.56 $1,926.72 200 $321.12 12 $1,926.72 90 CONNECT TO EXISTING STORM SEWER MH EA 2 $540.62 $1,081.24 0.00 $0.00 2 $1,081.24 91 2'X 3'CATCH BASIN WITH CASTING PER DETAIL 404 EA 2 $1,831L10 S3,676.20 1.00 $1.838.10 2 $3,676.20 92 4'DIA CBMH WITH CASTING PER DETAIL 402 EA 1 $1,838,10 $1,838.10 0.00 $0.00 1 $1,838.10 93 4'DIA CBMH WITH CASTING PER DETAIL 406 EA 6 $2,108.41 $12,6SO.46 0.00 $0.00 6 $12,650.46 94 4'DIA CBMH WITH SUMP AND CASTING PER DETAIL 405 EA 3 $2,91934 $8,758.02 0.00 $0.00 3 58,758.D2 95 15"RCP STORM SEWER,CLASS 5 LF 382 $42.17 $16,108.94 0.00 $0.00 382 516,108.94 96 18"RCP STORM SEWER,CLASS S LF 23S $45.41 $10,671.35 0.00 $0.00 240 $10,898.40 97 15"RCP FLARED END SECTION INCL TRASH GUARD EA 2 $1,243.42 $2.486.84 0.00 $O.DO 2 $2,486.84 98 18"RCP FLARED END SECTION INCL TRASH GUARD EA 1 $1,297.48 $1,297.48 0.00 $0.00 1 $1,297.48 99 CLASS 3 RIP RAP WITH FABRIC CY 15 $162.19 $2,432.85 0.00 $0.00 11 $1,848,97 100 DITCH GRADING LF 100 $10.70 $1,070.00 0.00 $0.00 p $D.00 101 IMPORT AND PLACE TOPSOIL BORROW(LVI CY 300 $15.00 $4,500.00 000 $0.00 0 $D.00 102 SODDING SY 5,000 $4.28 $21,400.00 0.00 $0.00 p $0.00 103 SEEDING,FERTILIZER,AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 400 $2,94 $1,176.00 0.00 $0.00 0 $0.00 104 4"DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE-EPDXY LF 1,440 $0.79 $1,137.60 0.00 SD.00 p $0.00 105 REMOVE SIGN EA 1 $27.03 $27.03 0.00 $0.00 1 $27.03 106 SIGN PANEL,TYPE C SF 9 $54.06 $486.54 0.00 50.00 p $0.00 107 SALVAGE SIGN EA 6 $27.03 $162.18 0.00 $0.00 S $135.15 108 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN EA 6 $124.34 $746.04 0.00 $0.00 o Sa.00 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 3 $388,398.04 5120,905.03 $208,405.26 DIVISION 4-MANNING TRAIL NORTH 109 MOBILIZATION LS 1 $3,500.00 $3,500.00 0.50 $1,750.00 0.50 $1,750.00 110 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1 $2,324.66 $2,324.66 0.20 $464.93 0.20 $464.93 111 SILT FENCE,TYPE MACHINE SLICED LF 6,600 $2.03 $13,398,00 1,620.00 $3,288.60 1,620.00 S3,288.60 112 STREET SWEEPING HR 25 5151.26 $3,781.50 0.00 so.00 p_Op $0.00 113 BIOROLL DITCH CHECK EA 20 $80.28 $1,605.60 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 114 CLEAR AND GRUB TREE EA 15 $588.73 $8,830.95 0.00 So.00 0.00 $0.00 115 SALVAGE MAILBOX EA 12 532.44 $389.28 0.00 $0.00 12.00 $389.28 116 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX EA 12 $37.84 $454.08 0.00 $0.00 0,00 $0.00 117 SAWCUT BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT LF 375 $2.17 $813.75 0.00 50,00 0.00 $0.00 118 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT SY 9,970 $2.71 $24,308.70 4,500.00 $12,195.00 4,500.00 $12,195.DD 119 RE MOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT IDRIVEWAYS) SY 130 $5.35 $69S.S0 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 REVISED CONTRACT THIS PERIOD TOTAL TO DATE ITEM DESCRIPTION OF PAY ITEM UNIT QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT QUANTITY AMOUNT 120 REMOVE AND DISPOSE OF EXISTING STORM SEWER PIPE LF 53 $10.81 $572.93 53,O0 $572.93 53,OO $572.93 121 COMMON EXCAVATION(P) CY 5,205 $8.56 $44,554.80 1,381.00 $11,821.36 1,381.00 $11,821.36 122 SUBGRADE EXCAVATION-RECONSTRUCT AREAS ICVI CY SOD $8.56 $4,280.00 0.00 SO.DO O,Op $0.00 123 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW ICV) CY 3,290 $12.31 $40.499.90 1,231.00 $15,153.61 1,231.00 $15,153,61 124 AGGREGATE BASE CLASS S TN 4,920 $10.17 $49,019.40 1,g49.00 $18,804,33 1849.00 $18,804.33 125 TYPE SP 12.5 BITUMINOUS NON-WEARING COURSE MIXTURE 12,8)ISPNWO23081 TN 1,360 $55.64 $75,670.40 0.00 $0,00 0,00 $0.00 126 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)ISPWEA240BI TN 820 $61.67 $50,569.40 0.00 SO.OD 0.00 $O.OD 127 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 640 $1.96 $1,254.40 Op0 50.00 000 $0.00 128 PATCH BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY SY 130 $20.27 52,63530 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $O.DO 129 PATCH GRAVEL DRIVEWAY TN 30 $27.02 $810.60 0.00 $0,00 0.00 $0.00 130 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING-100%CRUSHED LIMEROCK TN 34S $20.94 $7,189.80 0.00 $000 0.00 $0.00 131 4'PVC PERF EDGE DRAIN W16ACKFILL 8 WRAP LF 3,000 $11.77 $35,310.00 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 132 PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL(DRAIN TILE) EA 8 $535.21 $4,281.68 0.00 $0.00 0.00 $0.00 133 18"RCP STORM SEWER,CLASS S LF 48 $62.71 $3,010.08 48.00 $3,010.08 48.00 53,010.08 134 18"RCP FLARED END SECTION INCL TRASH GUARD EA 2 $1,297.49 $Z,594.98 LOG $2,594.98 2,00 $2,594,98 135 CLASS 3 RIP RAP WITH FABRIC CY 5 $162.19 $810.95 5.00 $810.95 5.00 $810.95 136 IMPORT AND PLACE TOPSOIL BORROW(LV) CY 500 $15.00 $7,500.00 0.00 $0.00 COD $0.00 137 SEEDING,FERTILIZER,AND EROSION CONTROL BLANKET SY 7.850 $2.94 523,079.DD 0.00 $0.00 0.00 SOMD 138 4"DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE-EPDXY LF 3,300 50.79 $2.607.00 ODD $0.00 0,00 $0.00 139 4"SOLID WHITE LINE-EPDXY LF 6.600 $0.48 $3,168A0 0.00 $0.00 O.OD $0.00 140 REMOVE SIGN EA 5 $27.03 $135.15 0.00 50.DO 5.00 $135.15 141 SIGN PANEL,TYPE C SF 21 $54.06 $1,1G8.23 0.00 $0.00 O.DD $0.00 142 SALVAGE SIGN EA 14 $27.03 $378.42 0.00 $0-DO 14.00 $378.42 143 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN EA 14 $124.34 51,740.76 0.00 $0.00 O,OO $0.00 SUBTOTAL-DIVISION 4 $422.893.00 $70,466.77 $71,369.67 TOTALS-BASE CONTRACT $1,372,577.25 $450,444.99 $573,601.80 CHANGE ORDER NO.1 COI-1 MOBILIZATION LS 1.0 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.0 $0.00 COI-2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS 1.0 $5,000.00 $5,000.00 0.0 $0.00 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,811SPWEA24081-LEVELING TN 300.0 $68.06 $20,419.00 0.0 $0.00 COI-3 COURSE C01-4 TYPE SP 9.5 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE MIXTURE(2,B)LSPW EA240BI TN 1,06510 $60.67 $64,613.55 0.0 $0.00 COLS BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT GAL 865.0 $1.96 $1.695.40 0.0 50.00 COl-6 CLASS 2 AGGREGATE SHOULDERING-100%CRUSHED LIMEROCK TN 260.0 $21.39 $5,561.40 0.0 $0.00 COI-7 4"DOUBLE SOLID YELLOW LINE-LATEX LF 4,860.0 $0.22 51,069.20 0.0 $0.00 COl-8 4"SOLID WHITE LINE-LATEX LF 9,72010 $0.11 $1,069.20 OD $0.00 TOTALS-CHANGE ORDER NO.1 $104,426.75 $0,00 $0.00 TOTALS-REVISED CONTRACT $1,477,004.00 $450,444.99 $573,601.80 THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM# 11 AGENDA ITEM: Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements—Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessments, and Calling for Hearing on Proposed Assessment SUBMITTED BY: Chad Isakson, Project Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Dave Snyder, City Attorney SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS if removed from the Consent Agenda): - Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate................................. ........ Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Engineering FISCAL IMPACT: None. i Calling a final assessment hearing follows state statute for assessing benefitting properties for the improvements constructed in 2014 following the City's Special Assessment Policy. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider declaring costs to be assessed and calling for the final assessment hearing for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2014-68,A Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements." --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 11] September 16,2014 LEGISLATIVE HISTORYBACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvement Project is near completion and the final project costs remain within the authorized project budget. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 the council must declare the amount to be assessed against the benefiting properties and Call the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for these improvements. The Assessment Hearing is proposed for October 21, 2014. The Final Assessment Roll must be certified to the County Auditor by November 30, 2014. Special assessments for this project were established as fixed amounts for a Trunk Watermain. Therefore the unit assessments remain unchanged with the final project costs. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve, as part of the Consent Agenda, Resolution No. 2014-68, thereby declaring the costs to be assessed to be $29,000; ordering the preparation of the proposed assessments with the unit assessments to be $2,900 for each benefitting property; and Calling for the Hearing on the proposed Assessments for October 21, 2014 at or around 7:00 PM. The recommended motion is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2014-68;A Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements." ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No. 2014-68; Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for Hearing on Proposed Assessment 2. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment 3. Final Assessment Roll --page 2 -- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014-68 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE WELL NO 4 CONNECTING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements including trunk watermain improvements along 50'h Street between the Well 4 site and Lake Elmo Avenue and along Lake Elmo Avenue from 500' Street to 43rd Street;and WHEREAS,the total cost of the water improvements will be $550,000; and WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have prepared the proposed assessment roll and will maintain said assessment roll on file in the City offices for public inspection. NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, 1. The portion of the cost of such water improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $521,000, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $29,000. 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvements against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land to be benefited by the improvements,and the Clerk has filed a copy of such proposed assessment in the City offices for public inspection. 3. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2015, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.61 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 4. A public hearing shall be held on the 21" day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M. to pass upon such proposed assessment. All persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 6. The owner of any property so assessed may,at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property,with interest accrued to the date of payment,to the City Clerk.No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. A property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to Resolution No. 2014-68 1 the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 21 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2014-68 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT WELL NO. 4 CONNECTING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Lake Elmo will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment against abutting property for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements. Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following describes the area proposed to be assessed: • The amount to be specially assessed against each particular lot, piece, or parcel of land receiving an individual service stub located along 50111 Street, from the Well 4 site to Lake Elmo Avenue, and along Lake Elmo Avenue, from 501h Street to 43ra Street, is $2,900. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor on November 21, 2014, pay the entire assessment on such property to the City Clerk with interest accrued to the date of payment. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid to the City Clerk 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 (date assessment certified to County Auditor) or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 4.61 percent per year. Once assessments are certified to the County,the assessments are payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2015,and will bear interest at the rate of 4.61 percent per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2014. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed watermain improvement assessment is $29,000. The City contribution for the watermain improvement project is $521,000. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection' signed by the affected property owner is filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, • Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. The City Council is authorized in its discretion to defer the payment of an assessment for any homestead property owned by a person for whom it would be a hardship to make payment if the owner is 65 years of age or older and/or the owner is a person retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability or by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in section 190.05 subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person's military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The owner must request a deferment of the assessment at or before the public hearing at which the assessment is adopted and make application on forms prescribed by the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption. Notwithstanding the standards and guidelines established by the City for determining a hardship, a deferment of an assessment may be obtained pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193. DATED: September 16, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson,Mayor (Published in the Oakdale-Lake Ehno Review on September 24, 2014) II o r o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 mma�mmmmmmmo N NN NN N tnANNN H a a zZ .ti .. .. '+ '+ am 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o o o o o 0 o 0 0 p N M N rl rl rl rl N M a ri 'i cl ri �-i 'i rl rl N O d N N N N N N N N N N mmmmmmmmmmi- 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 0 o 0 N O rl ti rl rl rl N .N-1 rl ' N M N N N N N N N n Q Q Q a Q Q Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1l1 U1 M M M VI M N VI V1 O w 0 0 0c 0 0 0 0 0 W Y o Y Y beY Y Y Y Y 05 °� 55555555 p a z a z z z z z z z z � Z W W W W W W W co F- z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w w W J J w W W W W W W W � a555gSg5g a �J � mm � mrvmuoi r"'.i u�i ZO .-� .. QaQQQQaQ a� � g F- w Z W W a U)cn Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z z a ¢ a a a a a a a o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z zcr W W W W W W W W Z LL p S S W W W W W W W W Q a � � 35535555 O o v m n m N m n N n rvvvvv � J � ~ W H a 3 z a r f- z z U =O — u S > ca w z Z a u hwu d! a ¢ Z �m J � � QotiN � � 0 X o~c w z O a a ] H O a O We in0 pm pv� ZFc Y2 ¢ � `ZO gm m � � > ZZJLL = m 0 w ° � mo � � m Ow a W Z oo m � U to THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM# 12 AGENDA ITEM: Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements—Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessments, and Calling for Hearing on Proposed Assessment SUBMITTED BY: Chad Isakson, Project Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Dave Snyder, City Attorney SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS if removed fi-oin the Consent Agenda): - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Public Input, if Appropriate................................. ........ Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Engineering FISCAL IMPACT: None. Calling a final assessment hearing follows state statute for assessing benefitting properties for the improvements constructed in 2014 following the City's Special Assessment Policy. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider declaring costs to be assessed and calling for the final assessment hearing for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements. If removed from the consent agenda, the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2014-69;A Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements." --page 1 -- I City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 121 September 16,2014 LEGISLATIVE HISTORYBACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Improvement Project is currently under construction and the final project costs remain within the authorized project budget. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 the council must declare the amount to be assessed against the benefiting properties and Call the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for these improvements. The Assessment Hearing is proposed for October 21, 2014. The Final Assessment Roll must be certified to the County Auditor by November 30, 2014. Special assessments for this project were established as fixed amounts for a Trunk Watermain. Therefore the unit assessments remain unchanged with the final project costs. There are additional properties along the project corridor that have requested to connect to City water and have therefore been provided a service stub as part of the project. These properties are not included on the final assessment roll because they will be assessed separately from the public improvement process. These properties are being required to sign an agreement to waive the right to appeal the assessment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve, as part of the Consent Agenda, Resolution No. 2014-69, thereby declaring the costs to be assessed to be $92,800; ordering the preparation of the proposed assessments with the unit assessments to be $2,900 for each benefitting property; and Calling for the Hearing on the proposed Assessments for October 21, 2014 at or around 7:00 PM. The recommended motion is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2014-69;A Resolution Declaring Costs to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for the Hearing on the Proposed Assessment for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements." ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No. 2014-69; Resolution Declaring Cost to be Assessed, Ordering Preparation of Proposed Assessment, and Calling for Hearing on Proposed Assessment. 2. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment. 3. Final Assessment Roll. --page 2-- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014-69 A RESOLUTION DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED, ORDERING PREPARATION OF PROPOSED ASSESSMENT, AND CALLING FOR HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, a contract has been let for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements including trunk watermain improvements along Lake Elmo Avenue from 301h Street south to future 5`h Street; and WHEREAS,the total cost of the water improvements will be$2,498,800 and WHEREAS, the City Clerk and City Engineer have prepared the proposed assessment roll and will maintain said assessment roll on file in the City offices for public inspection. NOW,THEREFORE,IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, 1. The portion of the cost of such water improvement to be paid by the City is hereby declared to be $2,406,000, and the portion of the cost to be assessed against benefited property owners is declared to be $92,800. 2. The City Clerk, with the assistance of the City Engineer, has calculated the proper amount to be specially assessed for such improvements against every assessable lot, piece or parcel of land to be benefited by the improvements, and the Clerk has filed a copy of such proposed assessment in the City offices for public inspection. 3. Assessments shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2015, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.61 percent per annum from the date of the adoption of the assessment resolution. 4. A public hearing shall be held on the 2151 day of October, 2014, in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M.to pass upon such proposed assessment. All persons owning property affected by such improvement will be given an opportunity to be heard with reference to such assessment. 5. The City Clerk is hereby directed to cause a notice of the hearing on the proposed assessment to be published once in the official newspaper at least two weeks prior to the hearing, and he shall state in the notice the total cost of the improvement. He shall also cause mailed notice to be given to the owner of each parcel described in the assessment roll not less than two weeks prior to the hearings. 6. The owner of any property so assessed may,at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the entire assessment on such property, with interest accrued to the date of payment,to the City Clerk. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid within 30 days from the adoption of the assessment. A property owner may at any time thereafter, pay to Resolution No. 2014-69 1 the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 21 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk I Resolution No. 2014-69 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT LAKE ELMO AVENUE TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Lake Elmo will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, October 21, 2014, to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment against abutting property for the Lake Elmo Avenue Trunk Watermain Improvements. Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following describes the area proposed to be assessed: • The amount to be specially assessed against each particular lot, piece, or parcel of land receiving a new individual service stub located along Lake Elmo Avenue North from 301h Street to future 5`h Street is $2,900. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor on November 21, 2014, pay the entire assessment on such property to the City Clerk with interest accrued to the date of payment. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid to the City Clerk 30 days from the adoption of this assessment. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before November 15 (date assessment certified to County Auditor) or interest will be charged through December 31 of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 4.61 percent per year. Once assessments are certified to the County, the assessments are payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2015, and will bear interest at the rate of 4.61 percent per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2014. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed watermain improvement assessment is $92,800. The City contribution for the watermain improvement project is $2,406,000. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting.No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. The City Council is authorized in its discretion to defer the payment of an assessment for any homestead property owned by a person for whom it would be a hardship to make payment if the owner is 65 years of age or older and/or the owner is a person retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability or by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in section 190.05 subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person's military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The owner must request a deferment of the assessment at or before the public hearing at which the assessment is adopted and make application on forms prescribed by the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption. Notwithstanding the standards and guidelines established by the City for determining a hardship, a deferment of an assessment may be obtained pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193. DATED: September 16, 2014 BY ORDER OF THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson,Mayor (Published in the Oakdale-Lake Elmo Review on September 24, 2014) I 0 LU 0 0 0 0 p0 0 0 0p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O 0 0 () F O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O 0 0 0 2 a j m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m °° a, N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N to N VT V/to aA V!V!N VI iA to N H Z .ti .-1 r-i e-i - - - - - '-I r-i '-1 H rl rl N r1 'i r-1 �-1 N rl r1 ti '4 r4 rl N M Q m O V N 0 M 0 N M M M l0 a M N 0 l0 V f o N N M M Q M o M V o 0 0 0 O O O O O O N O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o 0 o o o o o 0 0 o o o 0 o o o o 0 0 0 o 0 o 0 o o O o 0 N M M .-1 p N N N N N N N N M M M M M M M M M M M M �-1 �-1 a V e-1 c-I �-I .� •-1 N N rl Q '-I rl r-I rl rl rl N ri �-1 rl rl ti N rl rl rl rl rl rl rl rl N N '-1 e-I r-I c-1 c-1 r-1 '-1 N H 6 N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N O m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m m r N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a v v v v v v a v v v v o v C v V O e N c0 N N N M Mf M1 M1 M1 M M1 M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N MMMMMMMM N N N N N N N N N N N N N M N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N a00000000000o000a � o � � g ,n M M1 n O M M M , M M , , m M MI M1 Mf M V1 M M1 M M M M 0 M 0 M M M1 1A M1 M1 M M1 M o V1 V1 Vl Vl Ml m Ml Vl V1 Ml MI M M1 M M M M M M M M1 Ml M M N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z g Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y W Y Y ~ Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y F- gg3g353gg5 55 � ggg555g5g3S5gg5353 z z zzz zzzzz zz zzzzzz zzzzzzzzzzz W W W W W W W W W ) W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W w � a a a a a a a a F- a a ¢ a a a a a ¢ a a a a a a a a a a a 0 o 0 0 0 - W o o o o woo o o o o o o o N o O O O o 0 0 0 0 0 0 _Y - 0 -- d J J J X J J J X J J J J J J J X J J J J J J J W W W W O O W W W W O �j W W W W W W W W O W W W W W W W W W W W Z W W W m Z W W W W m K W W Y W W W W W W (D W W W W W W W W W W W J J ]C Y Y O ]e Y ]L Y W Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y Y ]L ]G Y ]e ]e Y ]C ]G ]C Y zJ a5ggaxg55gao3ga333g5g ° gg3333555g5 MnM oomo .-+ ooMmn .+ n .+ mm .+ wwwwwN r0 no F M M - N n V N m M rl W .-i .-1 m W •-1 b pa M QQ N W W N N N N N N N Ln N N N N N N N N N .ni .-I .M-I m m w w n O tD Ml 2 Y w y Z z z z z z z z z z z Z z Z z z z z z Z z z z z z z z z z z z z z W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W F-¢ aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaF J a a a z o000000000000OO000oo000000000000Z) „0 �Z LL J J J J J J J J J J J J ) J J J J J J J J W Q W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W - - - w W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W o ¢ g5ggS55g5555355ggggg5g55ggg3s5gg J �nn �nin .+ viMM .-� Mnvimn + n .� mm .+ �D �D �D �DF, NNao0 �Do M M ti 00 V n � N m O M r1 lD N rl m M .ti lD o m V1 V N n N O rl N Y N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N .n-1 N H m m a0 DD n n 1D Mf g m n o c Z cW J L V~_I U Q J z ¢ F o Z x U ¢ N m Z V7 W y� J cc .0 Z_ ¢ Q o: cc it In o U O W N mw f- 0xw � � w ¢ 0 Z cc C) m z vt = z cb N Q J NS OC W F- W d N! ~ C 0 Z � ut Z Z � ab Q a U � l7 °a O W v Y 1u K C x W ¢ w Y W x N r 3 z n: Z J U d w _ ¢ c Z z Z F O Q W x W Z m Y Q L O Z W U Z Vf a ¢ z F U u' l¢/1 C a z r a Z o = > u Z Z a a z Q Y O WO xoLD Qcv�i � Ov�i W z0 "'' w vZiOaaQZmp ¢ ] � rac ¢ W y W N Z �J J LL Y a C Z O W D'- Z 0 I-- ,�„ a x z U' O N V O O M p� 0= g W LL J > w z a 'a Q z x O u Z ¢ O o: O ¢ Ci O cc w O p J J C LL ca 0 � 1�- YZJXx3 LL ( uzm ,°`- 33xw3mxx > a o ¢ m OW }d Z rl N M O V1 wn wm ,'may eN-I 'M-I N N N N N N N N N N N N N N (Orl M M _W 0 CO THE CITY OE LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM #13 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Request for approval to abate interest on two street assessments levied in 2014 (Interest only) SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director THROUGH: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item..............................................................City Administrator - Report/Presentation.................................................City Administrator Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: Washington County/Finance FISCAL IMPACT: $270 SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of the Consent Agenda, the City Council is respectfully requested to consider approval to remove the interest assessed to parcels 05.029.21.41.0005 and 05.029.21.41.0006 from the 2014 assessment roll with Washington County. BACKGROUND INFORMATION/STAFF REPORT: Washington County recently notified the Finance Director that the State of Minnesota does not pay penalties, interest or costs unless specifically provided for by law. The mentioned parcels are owned by the Minnesota DNR. Since the Finance Director was unaware of this exception for state of Minnesota parcels, the assessments were filed with interest to be calculated by the County, as for all other assessments. As a result, an abatement form needs to be filed with the County in order to remove the interest --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 13] September 16,2014 from their account. This will also update their file going forward so that no interest is calculated on the remaining installments due on this assessment. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the fact that the State of Minnesota does not pay interest on assessments, it is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 2014-70 so that an abatement of the assessments can be filed with Washington County. ATTACHMENTS: 1. DNR Letter to Washington County requesting an abatement 2. Email from Washington County requesting an abatement form 3. Resolution 2014-70 4. WA Cty abatement form for 05.029.21.41.0005 5. WA Cty abatement form for 05.029.21.41.0006 --page 2-- { Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minnesota 500 Lafayette Road St.Paul,MN 55155-40c� I June 23, 2014 DEPARTMENTOF NATURAL RESOURCES i Washington County Dept. of Property Records and Taxpayer Services 14949 62"d Street North P.O. Box 200 i Stillwater, MN 55082-0200 Re: Parcel I D#: 05-029-21-41-0005, 05-029-21-41-0006 Dear Taxpayer Services: The 2014 property tax statement for the above-described parcels indicates that the following amount is due: Principal $ 300.00, Principal $ 300.00- + Interest $ 135.00 + Interest 135.00 Current Total $ 435.00A Current Total $ 435.00� �'t B a payment processed through the state s financials stem Washington Count will Y Y p g Y g y receive $600.00 as payment in full of the 2014 taxes assessed for street improvement. The statement indicates there was interest due on this parcel. It continues to be the position of the State of Minnesota, with review by the Attorney General, s office, that the State does not pay penalties, interests or costs unless specifically provided for by law. (See Minnesota Statutes, sec. 645.27). Generally, the counties either submit tax statements that only reflect the base tax, or the counties abate any penalties, interests or costs that appeared on the original statement. For your county, we would appreciate it if you would abate the interest that appeared on the 2014 property tax statements. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (651) 259-5393 or belem.escobedo-ibarra@state.mn.us. Sincerely, Belem Escobedo-Ibarra, Real Estate Technician DNR- Division of Lands & Mineral Enclosure wwwAni.state.mn.us AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER s0 PRI14TED ON RECYCLED PAPER CONTAINING A MINIMUM Of 10%POST-CONSUMER WASTE Cathy Bendel From: Kristi Haan [Kristi.Haan@co.washington.mn.us] Sent: Tuesday, August 26, 2014 9:57 AM To: Cathy Bendel Subject: Abatement of SA Interest for MN parcels Attachments: Letter from State of MN to abate int.pdf Hi Cathy- See attached letter from the State of MN. They have paid the principal portion of the SA but will not pay the interest portion. Can you please fill submit an abatement form to write-off this interest? This is typical and other cities have had to do the same thing. Please contact me with any questions. Thanks, 70-�WLv M. havc Principal Specialist- Taxation Division Washington County Property Records& Taxpayer Services 651-430-6191 651-430-6178(fax) 1 WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT- GENERAL FORM CLASSIFICATION/DISASTER CREDIT/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Received: Assessment Year: 2013 orksheet# Payable Year: 2014 APPLICANT Owner's Name (please print or type) Soc.Sec.i Fed ID Phom,� Cell State of MN-DNR Owners Name Soc.Sec./Fed ID Phone Cell Owner's Name Soc.Sec./Fed ID Phone Cell Owners Mailing Address Property Address(if different Boni mailing address) 500 Lafayette Road City State Zip City State Zip St.Paul MN 55155 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property ID Number Linked Group Number 05.029.21.41.0005 Legal Description of Property City or Township School Distract k TAG Lake Elmo 834 ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Original: Land EMV Improvement EMV Total Class 0 Revised: Land EMV Improvement EMV Total Class 0 Applicant's Statement of Facts: The City of Lake Elmo assessed this parcel for the 2012 street project assessment. This account was to be charged interest. The State of MN does not pay interest so the interest component needs to be abated. Applicant's Request: Abate the special assessment interest for Pay 2014 in the amount of$135.00. Applicant's Signature: Date: NOTE: M.S.§609.41,"Whoever, in making any statement,oral or written,which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of imposing,reducing,or abating any tax or assessment,intentionally makes any statement(as to any material matter whi Note: Must include city/Township Resolution for reductions on assessments Note: Must include Fire report for Local Option Disaster Credit 1 Rev 5/12 WASHINGTON COUNTY ASSESSMENT DIVISION APPLICATION FOR ABATEMENT-GENERAL FORM CLASSIFICATION/DISASTER CREDIT/SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS Received: Assessment Year: 2013 orksheet# Payable Year: 2014 APPLICANT Owner's Name (please print or type) Soc.Sec./Fed ID Phone Cell State of NIN - DNR Owners Name Soc.Sec./Fed ID Phone Cell Owner's Name Soc.Sec./Fed ID Phone Cell Owner's Mailing Address Property Address(if different from mailing address) 500 Lafayette Road City State Zip City State Zip St.Paul MN 55155 DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Property ID Number Linked Group Number 05.029.21.41.0006 Legal Description of Property City or Township 71School District fl TAG Lake Elmo 834 1 ASSESSOR'S ESTIMATED MARKET VALUE Original: Land EMV Improvement EMV Total Class 0 Revised: Land EMV Improvement EMV Total Class 0 Applicant's Statement of Facts: The City of Lake Elmo assessed this parcel for the 2012 street project assessment. This account was to be charged interest. The State of MN does not pay interest so the interest component needs to be abated. Applicant's Request: Abate the special assessment interest for Pay 2014 in the amount of$135.00. Applicant's Signature: Date: NOTE: M.S.§609.41,"Whoever, in making any statement,oral or written,which is required or authorized by law to be made as a basis of imposing,reducing,or abating any tax or assessment,intentionally makes any statement(as to any material matter whi Note: Must include city/Township Resolution for reductions on assessments Note: Must include Fire report for Local Option Disaster Credit 1 Rev 5/12 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014-70 A RESOLUTION RELATED TO 2014 ASSESSMENTS TO WASHINGTON COUNTY BE IT RESOLVED,by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, that the 2014 interest certified to PID #05.029.21.41.0005 and PID #05.029.21.41.0006 may be removed from the 2014 assessment roll due per the attached Washington County abatement forms. APPROVED by the Lake Elmo City Council on this 16t' day of September, 2014. By: Mike Pearson Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 CONSENT ITEM # 14 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization for John Schiltz to dispense beer and wine coolers at the Lake Elmo Volksmarch event on October 11, 2014 SUBMITTED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Deputy Clerk THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item..............................................................City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator - Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates ( - Call for Motion...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECOMMENDER: City Staff FISCAL IMPACT: NA SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is requested to consider authorization for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Volksmarch event on October 11, 2014. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If Council wishes to further discuss this authorization, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Volksmarch event being held October 11, 2014." --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Consent Agenda Item 14] September 16,2014 LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: Pursuant to MN State Statute 340A.404 Subd. 4(b), under Special provisions; sports, conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals, the governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by Section 340A.409 to cover the event. The City of Lake Elmo, in conjunction with local businesses and the community,will hold the Lake Elmo Volksmarch event on October 11, 2014. Authorization is necessary for the safe sale of alcohol at the event and to confirm that requirement of liability insurance for the municipal on-sale license holder. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize, as part of its Consent Agenda, for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Volksmarch event being held October 11, 2014. As part of the consent agenda, no formal motion is required. If Council wishes to further discuss the authorization, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on-sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Volksmarch event being held October 11, 2014." AUTHORITY: 2013 Minnesota Statutes: §340A.404 INTOXICATING LIQUOR; ON-SALE LICENSES. Subd. 4. Special provisions; sports, conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals. (b) The governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on-sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 340A.409 to cover the event. --page 2-- THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 REGULAR ITEM#: 15 MOTION $$ AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of Resolution to Affirm the Local Preferred Alternative (LPA) For the Bus Rapid Transit Route of the Gateway Corridor SUBMITTED BY: Dean Zuleger/Nick Johnson THROUGH: Mayor Mike Pearson,Council Member Mike Reeves, REVIEWED BY: Washington County Public Works, Lake Elmo EDA, Met Council SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item..............................................................City Administrator - Report/Presentation................................................City Administrator strator Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion...............................................................Mayor&City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor&City Council - Action on Motion....................................................................Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECCOMENDER: Mayor Mike Pearson & Council Member Mike Reeves, Members of the Policy Advisory Committee of the Gateway Commission FISCAL IMPACT: Up to $40,000 in planning support for Transportation Oriented Development from Washington County and $30,000-$50,000 in economic development analysis for the Bus Rapid Transit route along Hudson Boulevard. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City of Lake Elmo Council is asked to adopt Resolution No. 2014-71 recommending the evaluation of a bus rapid transit corridor that may be located in the right of way of Hudson Boulevard from Inwood Avenue to possibly as far as Manning Avenue. This alignment is known as the (A-B-C-D2 (Lake Elmo) — E2) cordior that runs from St.Paul to Lake Elmo/Woodbury. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: For 5+ plus years the Gateway Commission has explored mass transit strategies meant to create better efficiencies in moving commuter back and forth from St. Paul to the east end of Washington County. For the most part, the study has concentrated on a --page 1 -- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 15] September 16,2014 east-west transit line through the City of Woodbury (D1) with Lake Elmo resident access to the system being the Guardian Angels Church Park N Ride. Earlier this year, due to traffic management difficulties and ingress-egress conflicts, the Woodbury corridor was deferred to the Lake Elmo side of I-94 due to the green field nature of the community, less congestion, and a better opportunity to work with landowners on ingress-egress issues. So Lake Elmo went from an interested bystander in the Gateway process to a catalyst in the ability to extend the transit route past Oakdale. Earlier this year, the Gateway Commission chose bus rapid transit over light rail as the mode of transportation for costs savings, construction efficiency, and practicality. In the process of reviewing the impact of bus rapid transit in Lake Elmo, the City conducted meetings with landowners, its economic development authority, County/Met Council/ state officials, and other communities as part of its due diligence. On September 9, 2104 the City conducted a workshop with members of the Washington County Board to determine items of concern or need to approve the local Preferred Alternative needed to advance the project to the next level. Each City must adopt an LPA resolution prior to October 7, 2014 for the gateway project to be included in the Met Council's Transportation Project Plan. Adoption in to this plan will allow for the access of federal planning dollars to continue the analysis. 3 E In this due diligence, the City has come to the conclusion that (5) major items need to be addressed between the approval of the LPA resolution and the City's final approval — called municipal consent — that would be the final binding approval before transit route construction can take place. These items are: 4 1. That the County assumed jurisdictional control of Hudson Boulevard from Inwood Avenue to Manning Avenue which would could save Lake Elmo $10 million to $15 million over a 20 year period. 2. That Lake Elmo and the County agree to an access plan for Hudson Boulevard that would maintain current ingress-egress access for landowners to avoid business disruption. 3. The Gateway Commission consider an easterly station in the proximity of the NW corner of Manning Avenue and I-94 to support economic development. 4. That due to infrastructure constraints, an interchange is never built at the crossroads of 1-94 and Lake Elmo Avenue. 5. That a safety and security plan be developed for the Gateway Corridor that insures Lake Elmo residents will not be adversely affect by the BRT. These concerns were incorporated into the attached resolution and have been communicated to both the Gateway Commission and Washington County technical staff. Failure to pass this LPA would force the Gateway Commission into a 180 day proving process for the need of the BRT with the Met Council and eliminate federal funding for future analysis. F --page 2 -- City Council Meeting [Regular-Agenda Item 1 SJ September 16,2014 E BACKGROUND INFORMATION (SWOT): Strengths Passage of the LPA will allow the City to access planning dollars and support PLUS an independent economic development study (funded by East Metro Strong) to help in the commercial development of Lake Elmo. The value of this service is $70,000- $90,000 of program revenue. Lake Elmo can still veto the process at municipal consent. Weaknesses Lake Elmo has not had the sufficient time to fully analyze the ramifications of Gateway and the E2 terminus without regard to a station on Manning Ave. could hamstring development efforts. Opportunities A complete economic development analysis would help in the recruitment of business and proper planning of the 194 corridor. Threats BRT could cause traffic congestion, increased density and other safety issues that could affect the community's character. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends and appropriate guiding motion. "Adoption of Resolution 2014-71 Transmitting the City of Lake Elmo's support of the locally preferred alternative (LPA) to the Ramsey County Regional Railroad Authority, Washington County Regional Railroad Authority, and the Metropolitan Council." h Y {G Fk E4[ 4 j b --page 3 -- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2014-71 A RESOLUTION TRANSMITTING THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO'S SUPPORT OF THE LOCALLY PREFERRED ALTERNATIVE(LPA)TO THE RCRRA,WCRRA,and METROPOLITAN COUNCIL WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor is a proposed project that will provide for transit infrastructure improvements in the eastern portion of the Twin Cities,and; WHEREAS,the purpose of the project is to provide transit service to meet the existing and long-term regional mobility and local accessibility needs for businesses and the traveling public within the project area by providing all day bi-directional station-to-station service that compliments existing and planned express bus service in the corridor,and; WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor is located in Ramsey and Washington Counties,Minnesota,extending approximately 12 miles,and connecting downtown Saint Paul with its East Side neighborhoods and the suburbs of Maplewood,Landfall,Oakdale,Lake Elmo,and Woodbury,and; WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor Commission(GCC),in partnership with the Metropolitan Council and other project stakeholders,completed the Gateway Corridor Alternatives Analysis(AA) Study that in addition to the No- Build alternative recommended one bus rapid transit(BRT)and one light trail transit(LRT)alternative be advanced for farther study in the federal and state environmental review process,and; WHEREAS,the Federal Transit Administration(FTA);the Washington County Regional Railroad Authority (WCRRA),serving on behalf of the GCC;and the Metropolitan Council have initiated the environmental review process for the Gateway Corridor project,with FTA designated as the lead federal agency for this project,and; WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor project recently received the important Presidential designation as a Federal Infrastructure Permitting Dashboard Project,and; WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor project recently completed the Scoping phase of the environmental process, which resulted with the Policy Advisory Committee(PAC)and the GCC recommending further study of the No- Build alternative,four BRT alternatives operating within a dedicated Guideway (A-B-C-D1-El,A-B-C-D2-El,A- B-C-D2-E2,A-B-C-D2-E3)and a managed lane alternative in the Draft Environmental Impact Statement(EIS)at the request of the FTA and Federal Highway Administration(FHWA),and; WHEREAS,the BRT alignments that advance into the Draft EIS will be further defined and evaluated to minimise impacts to surrounding properties and the I-94 corridor which may include operating in existing lanes with mixed traffic at pinch points where right-of-way is constrained,enhance economic development potential,and reduce capital costs while providing required operating efficiency,with attention to mobility options for environmental justice populations,and; i WHEREAS,through the Scoping process,the PAC and the GCC recommended that the LRT alternative be eliminated from further study due to its higher costs while generating a similar ridership,and; WHEREAS,the identification of a Locally Preferred Alternative(LPA)is a critical first step in pursuing federal funding for the Gateway Corridor project,and; WHEREAS,the adoption of the LPA into the Metropolitan Council's Transportation Policy Plan will conclude the FTA Alternatives Analysis process,and; WHEREAS,the LPA will be one of the Build alternatives identified and studied in the Draft EIS,and; WHEREAS,the LPA includes the definition of the Gateway Corridor mode and a conceptual alignment which can be refined through further engineering efforts,and; WHEREAS,the LPA selection process does not replace or override the requirement to fully examine alternatives and determine the adverse impacts that must be avoided or mitigated under the federal and state environmental review process,and; WHEREAS,the comments submitted by agencies,the business sector,and the public during the Scoping phase,as well as the additional comments received from adjacent communities since the Scoping phase,will be addressed accordingly through the Draft EIS process,and; WHEREAS,the PAC and GCC each passed resolutions on July 24,2014 recommending BRT Alternative A-B-C- D2-E2(see attached figure)as the proposed LPA for review at the August 7 PAC sponsored LPA public hearing and inclusion in the Metropolitan Council's Draft 2040 Transportation Policy Plan,and; WHEREAS,the Gateway Corridor PAC/GCC held a public hearing on August 7,2014 as part of the LPA decision making process.A total of 35 comments were received through the proposed LPA review process,and; WHEREAS,the Cities will be working collaboratively and with support from the GCC to complete a market analysis and station area plans for the areas around the BRT Guideway stations as a part of the Draft EIS process, and; NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo supports the LPA recommendation of the PAC and GCC and identifies the dedicated BRT altemative generally on the Hudson Road—Hudson Boulevard alignment that crosses to the south side of 1-94 between approximately Lake Elmo Avenue and Manning Avenue is the Locally Preferred Alternative for the Gateway Corridor project(see attached figure). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo commits to undertaking and developing station area plans with the support of the GCC for the proposed BRT guideway station areas within its jurisdiction based on the results of a market analysis,community input,and Metropolitan Council guidelines and expectations for development density,level of activity,and design. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that through the Draft EIS process the PAC and the GCC will continue to evaluate and focus on transit service connections to the dedicated BRT system(A-B-C-D2-E2),including an efficient feeder bus network,as well as the number and location of stations throughout the Gateway Corridor to maximize service, accessibility,and surrounding economic development opportunities,while minimizing impacts. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo commits to working with the Washington County Regional Railroad Authority,on behalf of the Gateway Corridor Commission,and the Metropolitan Council to address the comments submitted by agencies,adjacent communities,the business sector,and the public during the Scoping phase,as well as additional comments received during the development of the LPA,through the Draft EIS process,and the following areas of particular importance to the City of Lake Elmo. 1. The ownership and maintenance responsibilities of Hudson Boulevard were recently turned back to the City of Lake Elmo from MnDOT. If Hudson Boulevard is expanded to accommodate a BRT guideway or additional travel lanes for the exclusive use of buses it may increase the demands on the City to properly maintain the roadway. The City of Lake Elmo requests analysis of appropriate jurisdictional control over Hudson Boulevard and robust consideration of a possible turn back to Washington County. 2. Maintaining access for current land owners along Hudson Boulevard and planning for access for future development needs to be part of a functional ingress—egress policy.The City of Lake Elmo requests the development of an access management plan for Hudson Blvd.that is supported by property owners,the City of Lake Elmo and Washington County. 3. The City of Lake Elmo supports an easterly station in the proximity of the NW comer of Manning Avenue and I-94 to support economic development,including job creation,tax value,and traffic efficiency i associated with the creation of a business park as guided by the City's Comprehensive Plan.Incorporating a Gateway station in Lake Elmo will require station area planning resources to ensure that Lake Elmo is maximizing economic development potential and ridership.The City Lake Elmo requests thorough analysis of economic development potential to assist in guiding the placement of Gateway stations in the corridor segment from Keats Avenue to Manning Avenue as well as planning resources from the Gateway Corridor Commission and Washington County to assist with transit oriented development/station area planning. 4. Lake Elmo Avenue serves as an important access point to downtown Lake Elmo. Due to the proximity of the road to both the Lake and developed neighborhoods,future expansion is constrained through the downtown area and the roadway cannot functionally handle additional growth in the regional movement of traffic beyond what is currently forecasted.The City of Lake Elmo recognizes that while the Gateway Corridor project will likely not preclude an interchange in this location,it would like to take this opportunity to state to Washington County,the Minnesota Department of Transportation and the Federal Highways Administration that an interchange is NOT desired in this location. 5. Safety and security at BRT stations for transit patrons and surrounding businesses and neighborhoods is very important to Lake Elmo. BRT Stations should be designed to be safe and secure environments that incorporate design elements to deter crime such as good lighting,visibility,security monitoring. The City of Lake Elmo requests a safety and security plan to ensure that adequate resources are provided at a regional and local level to effectively address safety and security concerns at Gateway Corridor facilities. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this resolution adopted by the City of Lake Elmo be forwarded to the Metropolitan Council for their consideration. Recommended Locally Preferred Alternative—BRT Alternative A-B-C-D2-E2(Conceptual) ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2014. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk THE CITY of LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION i DATE: 9/16/14 REGULAR ITEM#16 RESOLUTION 2014-072 AGENDA ITEM: Inwood Planned Unit Development—General Concept Plan SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director Nick M. Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Jack Griffin, City Engineer Mike Bouthilet, Public Works Superintendent Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.....................................Community Development Director - Report/Presentation..............................Community Development Director Questions from Council to Staff.............................................Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion....................................................................Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECCOMENDER: The Planning Commission unanimously recommends approval of a Planned Unit Development (PUD) General Concept Plan for a mixed-used planned development to be named Inwood, located in Stage 1 of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. In recommending approval of the PUD Concept Plan, the Planning Commission made several findings of fact and recommended 25 conditions of approval. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD — All costs incurred to the City through the review of the application are reimbursed by land use application fees and a development escrow. The project covers 157 acres of land, and will include the extension of public services (water and sewer) into the site. The developer will be required to prepare a developer's agreement for all phases of the project, at which point all public and private improvements will be identified. The developer is proposing to construct 5`h Street as privately as part of the overall improvements. --page I -- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 16] September 16,2014 SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to consider a request from Hans Hagen Homes and Inwood 10, LLC for a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Concept Plan for a new mixed-use development on 157 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 1 Oth Street in Lake Elmo. The concept plan as submitted includes 273 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses. The Planning Commission held a public hearing and considered the PUD at its August 25t' meeting, and postponed taking action on the concept plan until its September 8a' meeting. After further discussion at is September 8`" meeting, the Commission is recommending approval of the PUD General Concept Plan with 25 conditions of approval, some of which will require modifications to the plans as presented. The suggested motion to adopt the Planning Commission recommendation is as follows: "Move to adopt Resolution 2014-072,approving the Inwood PUD General Concept Plan." LEGISLATIVE HISTORY/PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission considered the PUD plans at its August 25 1hmeeting and conducted a public hearing on the request at this time. There were several comments received from the public at this meeting, and in addition to these statements, Staff also received written communication from the Department of Natural Resources and from a neighboring property owner. Rather than summarizing the public comments in this memorandum, Staff has attached an excerpt of the minutes from the Commission's meeting concerning the PUD for review by the Council. The letter from the DNR and neighboring property owner is likewise attached. After discussing various aspects of the project suggesting several modifications to the conditions of approval, the Commission ultimately postponed taking action on the PUD. As part of its ongoing review of the proposed project, the Commission conducted a site visit to a similar development that the applicant is building in Blaine, Minnesota on September 3, 2014. In addition, as a follow-up to the public hearing, the developer submitted a revised site plan in order to address the initial comments and recommendations of the Planning Commission. Staff has included the revised site plan with this report. The Commission continued its discussion on the PUD Concept Plan (and reviewed the updated concept plan) at its September 8, 2014 meeting, and received additional testimony from members of the public at this time. The City Council has been provided with the draft minutes from this meeting as part of its meeting agenda packet, which includes a summary of the comments that were received. As part of its discussion, the Commission recommending the inclusion of eight additional conditions of approval beyond those drafted by Staff, which included the requirements/conditions as follows: 1) All multi-family housing is to be located south of 5`h Street. 2) Sidewalks will be provided on one side of every street with cul-de-sacs except 9`h Street. 3) The trail along the Stonegate boundary will be located as far west as possible. --page 2-- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 16] September 16,2014 4) The lots at the end of cul-de-sacs in neighborhoods E, F, and H will be designed as designer(larger) lots. 5) The developer will consider adding a small park to the northwest portion of the site subject to review by the Park Commission. 6) The high density housing area will be limited to a maximum of 15 units per acre. 7) The design for the commercial and multi-family areas will be consistent with the single- family housing and throughout the development. 8) All cul-de-sac will meet the City's maximum length requirements. Since the Planning Commission meeting, Staff has received comments from the Chair expressing concern that the issues associated with the lot sizes within the development did not receive much discussion at the meeting. As noted in the development plans, the developer is proposing a mix of different lot sizes within the "lifestyle housing" portion of the development, and these lots would be allocated as follows: • 20% 38 foot wide lots • 60% 50 foot wide lots • 20% 58 foot wide lots It is Staff's expectation, that should the project be approved, that the final development plans will need to follow this general allocation of lots throughout the project. While there was no specific motion at the Planning Commission meeting to regulate the number of each type of lot permitted, at least two Commissioners have indicated that they would prefer a higher percentage of larger lots within the development. At this time, Staff is asking that the Council review this aspect of the project plans as it considers the Planning Commission's recommendation, and would need to request changes to the development plans if it fmds the allocation of lot sizes to be unacceptable to the City. Staff is on record as supporting the proposed lot size mix as proposed by the developer. In order to provide the City Council with a complete description of the information considered by the Planning Commission, Staff has attached the detailed reports submitted for both the meetings at which the Planning Commission considered the PUD. These reports include detailed information concerning the concept plan in addition to the staff review and analysis of the request. As noted earlier, any updated plans that were submitted by the applicant in between Commission meetings have been integrated into the plans attached to this report. After a lengthy discussion concerning the PUD Concept Plan and the recommended conditions of approval,the Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend approval of the Inwood PUD General Concept Plan with conditions of approval. The complete list of recommended conditions may be found in Resolution 2014-072 (Attachment#1). The motion passed with a vote of 5 ayes and 2 nays. The dissenting Commissioners did not agree that that the PUD plans were consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan, and noted that these plans did not meet the minimum standards of the LDR zoning district. BACKGROUND INFORMATION (SWOT): --page 3-- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 16] September 16,2014 Strengths • Approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan allows the applicants to move forward with the preparation of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application. • The Planning Commission and Staff both determined that the proposed Concept Plan is consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. • The proposed planned development offers unique design that is consistent with the City's desire to promote walkable single family neighborhoods with common open space. Weaknesses • The project includes several conditions of approval that will need to be met by the applicant. Opportunities • The PUD will add users to the City's public water and sanitary sewer system(with connection fees). • The project includes a major piece of the planned 5a' Street minor collector road. Threats • The City of Oakdale has raised concerns about transportation access issues along Inwood Avenue. Washington County has agreed to assist in the development of an access spacing plan for Inwood Avenue in the near future. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the above report, background information, and related attachments, the Planning Commission and Staff are recommending that the City Council approve the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with 25 conditions of approval. The suggested motion to adopt the Planning Commission recommendation is as follows: "Move to adopt Resolution 2014-072, approving the Inwood PUD General Concept Plan." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2014-072 2. Planning Commission Staff Report—9/8/14 3. Planning Commission Staff Report—8/25/14 4. Location Map 5. Application Form 6. Project Narrative(Revised/Supplement) 7. Project Narrative(Original) 8. Inwood PUD Concept Plan w/Details(Revised) 9. Inwood PUD Concept Planning&Design Booklet(Color Copies) 10. City Engineer's Review Memorandum, dated 8/13/14 11. Fire Chief s Review Memorandum,dated 8/19/14 12. Washington County Review Memorandum, dated 8/20/14 13. Minnesota DNR Review Comments 8/25/14 14. City of Oakdale Review Comments 8/29/14 --page 4-- City Council Meeting [Regulaa•Agenda Iten! 16] September 16,2014 15. City of Oakdale Email Comments 9/8/14 16. Tom FitzGerald, Email Comments 8/25/14 17. Stonegate Neighborhood Petition 9/8/14 18. Planning Commission Meeting Minutes (Excerpt) 8/25/14 --page 5 -- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2014-072 A RESOL UTION APPROVING THE INWOOD PUD GENERAL CONCEPT PLAN WHEREAS,Hans Hagen Homes, 941 NE Hillwind Road, Suite 300, Fridley,MN and Inwood 10, LCC, 95 South Owasso Boulevard West, St. Paul,MN ("Applicants")have submitted an application to the City of Lake Elmo("City")for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Plan for a proposed planned development to be called Inwood, copies of which are on file in the City Planning Department; and WHEREAS,the proposed Concept Plan is for a mixed-use Planned Unit Development development on 157 acres of land located at the southeast comer of Inwood Avenue and 10lb Street in Lake Elmo and that the Concept Plan includes 273 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on August 25, 2014 to consider the request and continued its discussion concerning the request at its September 8, 2014 meeting; and WHEREAS,on September 8,2014 the Lake Elmo Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the Inwood PUD Concept Plan; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and recommendation concerning the Inwood PUD Concept Plan to the City Council as part of a memorandum from the Planning Department dated September 16, 2014; and WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the proposed Inwood PUD Concept Plan at a meeting on September 16,2014. NOW,THEREFORE,based upon the testimony elicited and information received,the City Council makes the following: FINDINGS 1) That the procedure for obtaining approval of said PUD Concept Plan is found in the Lake Elmo City Code, Section 154.800. Resolution 2014-072 2 2) That all the requirements of said City Code Section 154.800 related to the PUD Concept Plan have been met by the Applicant. 3) That the proposed PUD Concept Plan is for a mixed-use Planned Unit Development on 157 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 10`h Street in Lake Elmo and that the Concept Plan includes 273 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses. 4) That the PUD Concept Plan will be located on property legally described on the attached Exhibit"A". 5) That the proposed PUD Concept Plan includes exceptions to the City's underlying Zoning District requirements that will be more fully described as part of the Applicant's Preliminary PUD Development Plans. 6) That the proposed General Concept Plan for a PUD is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan and that the uses proposed are consistent with the LDR—Urban Low Density Residential,C—Commercial, and HDR—High Density Residential land use designations shown for the area on the official Comprehensive Land Use Plan. 7) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the general intent of the City's Urban Low Density Residential,Urban High Density Residential and Commercial zoning districts with the exception of the issues identified in the Staff Reports. 8) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 9) That the Inwood PUD complies with the City's PUD Ordinance,and specifically the identified objectives for the consideration of a Planned Development. 10)That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the City's engineering standards with exceptions as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated August 13,2014. 11)That the master-planning technique utilized in the Inwood PUD Concept Plan provides thoughtful integration of multiple land uses, a variety of housing types and an effective and connected transportation system, allowing for different modes of travel throughout the site. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Based on the foregoing,the Applicants' application for a PUD Concept Plan is granted, provided the following conditions are met: 1) The applicant must obtain permission and consent from the adjoining property owner, Bremer Bank, related to the right-of-way and alignment of the 5`b Street minor collector road in the southeast corner of the site. The final alignment must be determined prior to the Resolution 2014-072 3 submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat applications. 2) Request for flexibility related to lot size, width, setbacks and all other requirements per the City's Zoning Ordinance or Design Standards must be clarified and documented as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat submission. 3) The application for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan approval will include an overall PUD planning document that addresses the flexibility requests noted in the preceding condition and that also specifies the specific design considerations to be used throughout the project area. 4) The Preliminary PUD plans will include a phasing plan for all portions of the development. 5) The Preliminary Development Plans shall include a water tower within the project development area in a location that is deemed acceptable by the City Engineer. As an alternative, the developer may identify an alternate location off-site for the water tower in a location deemed acceptable by the City Engineer provided the ownership of the site is transferred to the City and all required utility connections are constructed in conjunction with the platting of the Inwood PUD. 6) The Preliminary PUD plans shall be updated to include additional park land in the southeastern portion of the site. A larger park area of 5 to 10 acres adjacent to the existing Stonegate Park and with access to 5`h Street is the preferred location. The location and size of this park will be subject to review by the Lake Elmo Park Commission. 7) All street and median geometrics must accommodate emergency vehicle access and maintenance. Applicants must demonstrate acceptable turning radii for all uniquely shaped landscape medians and cul-de-sacs. 8) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed district prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 9) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision, and the land is located outside of any restrictive easements. 10)The applicant shall observe all comments and recommendations from the City Engineer documented on the Engineer's report dated August 13, 2014. 11)The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans will address review comments and issues that are identified within the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Inwood planned development site. 12)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City clarifying responsibility for all median landscaping and stormwater facilities internal to the single family residential streets. 13)The applicants must work with the City to determine fair and equitable cost share for City costs related to the future signalization of the intersection at 56' Street and Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). 14)The applicant must work with Washington County to address all review comments documented in the attached report dated 8/20/14 pertaining to access and intersection design Resolution 2014-072 4 for Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13) and 10" Street(CSAH 10). 15)The applicant must provide sidewalks on both sides of Street B to better serve the single family residential area. 16)Additional trail segments along the east side of Inwood Avenue from 5`b Street to 10a' Street and along 10`h Street from Inwood Avenue to the Greenbelt Buffer Trail must be incorporated into the plans. 17)The applicant must work with the City to ensure compliance with the City's shoreland provisions and the standards of the SWWD and MN DNR related to shoreland areas of designated public waters. 18)The development plans must be updated so that all multi-family housing is located south of 5th Street. No multi-family residential development will be allowed north of 56' Street. 19)Sidewalks shall be provided on one side of every street, including all cul-de-sacs and loop roads within the development with the exception of 9th Street. 20)The trail within the eastern buffer area near the property boundary with the Stonegate subdivision shall be located as far west as possible on the site. 2 1)The lots at the far eastern cul-de-sacs in neighborhoods E, F, and H shall be platted as designer(larger) lots in accordance with the lot so designated on the PUD Concept Plan. 22)The developer shall consider adding a small park to the northwest portion of the site subject to review and comment by the Park Commission. 23)The high density housing area shall be limited to a maximum of 15 units per acre. 24)The design for structures within the commercial and multi-family areas shall be consistent with the overall design throughout the development, including the single-family neighborhoods. 25)All cul-de-sac streets shall meet the City's maximum length requirements as specified in the City's Subdivision Ordinance. Passed and duly adopted this 16`''day of September 2014 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Mike Pearson,Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk Resolution 2014-072 THE CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION LAKE ELMO DATE: 9/8/14 AGENDA ITEM: 5B—BUSINESS ITEM CASE#2014-42 ITEM: Inwood Planned Unit Development(PUD)—General Concept Plan SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Greg Malmquist,Fire Chief Ann Pung-Terwedo,Washington County Matt Moore, South Washington Watershed District Molly Shodeen, MN DNR Emily Shively, City of Oakdale SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a request from Hans Hagen Homes and Inwood 10,LLC for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Plan for a new mixed-use development on 157 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 10th Street in Lake Elmo. The concept plan includes 273 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses. Staff is recommending approval of the PUD Concept Plan with 17 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on at their meeting on 8/25/14 and postponed consideration of the planned development. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Hans Hagen Homes (John Rask), 941 NE Hillwind Rd. Suite 300, Fridley, MN 55432 and Inwood 10(Tom Scheutte),LLC, 95 S Owasso Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55117-7830 Property Owners: Inwood 10, LLC (Tom Scheutte), 95 S Owasso Blvd. W., St. Paul, MN 55117-7830 Location: Part of Section 33 in Lake Elmo, immediately south of IOt" Street(CSAH 10), immediately north of Eagle Point Business Park, immediately east of Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13) and immediately west of Stonegate residential subdivision. PIDs: 33.029.21.12.0001, 33.029.21.12.0003, 33.029.21.11.0002 and 33.029.21.11.0001. BUSINESS ITEM 5B 2 Request: Application for Concept Plan approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD) containing 281 single family lots, 144 townhome units, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior living townhome units and multiple sites intended for commercial uses to be named Inwood of Lake Elmo. Existing Land Use and Zoning: Vacant land used for agricultural purposes. Current Zoning: RT—Rural Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR—Low Density Residential, HDR—High Density Residential and C—Commercial (all with PUD overlay) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant agricultural land and two residential homes— RR and PF zoning; West: Oak Marsh Golf Course, urban single family subdivision, commercial—City of Oakdale jurisdiction; South: Offices in Eagle Point Business Park(including Bremer Bank facility)—BP zoning; East: Stonegate residential estates subdivision—RE zoning. Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential (2.5—4 units per acre), Urban High Density Residential/Mixed Use(7.5 — 15 units per acre) and Commercial. History: The site has historically been used for agricultural purposes. The applicants have submitted a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW) for publication to the Environmental Quality Board(EQB)on September 15th, commencing the 30-day comment period. Deadline for Action: Application Complete—8/12/14 60 Day Deadline— 10/10/14 Extension Letter Mailed—No 120 Day Deadline— 12/9/14 Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153 —Subdivision Regulations Article 10—Urban Residential Districts(§154.450) Article 12—Commercial Districts(§154.550) Article 16—Planned Unit Development(§154.800) Article 17—Shoreland Management Overlay District REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received an application from Hans Hagen Homes and Inwood 10, LLC for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Plan for a mixed-use project that will be located on 157 acres of land located south of 10'b Street(CSAH 10)and east of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) in Lake Elmo. The proposed project will include 273 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses,in addition to storm water facilities,trails, and park areas as depicted on the attached site development plan. While the planned uses for the site generally match those shown on the City's future land use map for the property,the applicant is proposing a slightly different configuration of the various land uses. Most notably, the developer is asking BUSINESS ITEM 5B 3 that the commercial area be moved further south along Inwood Avenue to the intersection of 51 Street and that a small area of multi-family development be allowed at the intersection of Inwood Avenue and 10'h Street. The Planning Commission reviewed the request and held a public hearing on 8/25/14. At the public hearing,testimony was received from Nancy Andert(697 Julep Ave. N.),Mike Lancette (832 Jasmine Ave.N.)and Curt Montieth(331 Julep Ave.N.). In addition,the City received letters from MN DNR and Tom Fitzgerald(877 Jasmine Ave.N.),both of which were entered into the public record. For further detail on the content of the testimony during the public hearing,please refer to the draft minutes for the 8/25/14 Planning Commission meeting, which is attached to the 9/8/14 Planning Commission Agenda Packet. In addition to holding the public hearing, the Planning Commission discussed many different elements of the proposed planned development. Over the course of discussion, the Planning Commission made several motions related to review of the Concept Plan. The summary of the Planning Commission review on 8/25/14 can be found in the Planning Commission Review,Analysis and Recommendations Section. After significant discussion of the proposed planned development, the Planning Commission postponed consideration of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan until the next meeting to allow the Planning Commissioners to visit a similar Hans Hagen development containing Lifestyle Homes, The Lakes in Blaine,MN. The site visit was useful in becoming familiar with the requested residential product(Lifestyle Homes) and the requested setbacks. hi response to many of the questions and discussion items at the Planning Commission meeting on 8/25/14,the applicant has submitted an updated Concept Plan and cover letter(Attachment #2)to address many of the questions/discussion. The updated Concept Plan is generally consistent with the original version submitted to the Planning Commission with a couple modifications. The modifications are noted in the Planning and Zoning Issues Section. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES Staff provided a complete analysis of the proposed planned development from a planning and zoning perspective in a Staff Report dated 8/25/14. The previous Staff Report is attached electronically to this report for reference. In the original Staff Report, staff recommended 18 conditions of approval related to the Inwood PUD Concept Plan. For the purposes of the Planning Commission's second review of the proposed development, it should be noted that staff still supports the originally recommended conditions of approval with one exception. Original Condition# 12 required the applicant to remove two residential lots that encroached on the required 100-foot greenbelt buffer. With the submittal of an updated Concept Plan, no residential lots encroach on the required buffer area. Therefore, Original Condition#12 has been removed as a recommended condition of approval,leaving 17 recommended conditions, all of which are referenced in this Staff Report. To address some of the questions and discussion topics from the 1 S`review of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan, the applicants have submitted an updated Concept Plan, an Open Space Plan and a response letter detailing some of the changes and responding to some of the discussion topics. These materials can be found in Attachment#2. Many of the changes or discussion items are identified in the response or cover letter provided with the updated plans. The changes in the updated Concept Plan include the following: BUSINESS ITEM 5B 4 • The updated Concept Plan includes increased park area in the area adjacent to Stonegate Park. The applicants acknowledge that the plan must be reviewed by the Park Commission in advance of solidifying an acceptable design and location of the park areas. • The single family lot count has been reduced from 281 to 273 to account for additional park space and protection of existing man-made wetlands on the site. • The updated net density calculation is 3.14 units/acre, as opposed to 3.22 units/acre in the previous plan. As noted in the cover letter, this density calculation does not include any of the larger ponding areas associated with the development. These areas would typically be included according to the City's net density definition, as has been the case in other single family subdivisions. Staff is extremely confident that the single family area proposed in the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is well within the acceptable range required under the City's Comprehensive Plan. • The applicant provided three notes with regards to lot area, lot width and setbacks that relate to the allowed variations or flexibilities from the Zoning Code that can be achieved through the PUD Ordinance. After reviewing the comments pertaining to the lot area, lot width and setbacks, staff finds that the applicant's analysis of the City's PUD Ordinance is accurate. Therefore, applicants are permitted to request such variations from the Zoning Code as long as they are meeting one or more of the identified objectives for planned developments per the ordinance. • The applicants have provided an Open Space Plan to demonstrate that they are meeting the 20%open space requirement for PUDs. The Open Space Plan is included in Attachment#2. • The length of Cul-De-Sac L has been reduced to provide more park area adjacent to Stonegate Park. Staff still has some concern that it may exceed 600 feet in length, the maximum allowed length of cul-de-sac for an urban subdivision. Staff will continue to work with the applicant to ensure conformance to the rules of the City's Subdivision Ordinance. • The original Concept Plan included two residential lots that encroached on the required 100-foot greenbelt buffer. The updated Concept Plan has corrected this issue, maintaining, and in many cases far exceeding,the 100-foot buffer requirement. As a result, staff would recommend removing the condition related to removing Lots 27 and 28, Block 7 from the greenbelt buffer area(Condition#12 on the 8/25/14 Staff Report). It should be noted that although the applicant is providing an updated Concept Plan,the recommended conditions of approval in the original Staff Report still apply(with the exception of Original Condition#12). The applicant is providing the updated Concept Plan to be responsive to questions and discussion items posed by the Planning Commission. In addition, the updated plan includes a concept of increased park area adjacent to Stonegate Park. Staff is still recommending that the applicant present these plans to the Park Commission on September 15`h. Overall,the updated plan is consistent with the previous plan with the exceptions noted. Given the limited scope of the changes in the updated plan,the previous Staff Report, dated 8/25/14, and conditions(with exception of Condition#12) still apply. BUSINESS ITEM 5B 5 In addition to the planning and zoning issues that were outlined in the previous Staff Report, it should be noted that the City of Oakdale submitted a comment letter noting opposition to potential future restrictions of access at Oak Marsh Drive and 9a' Street North. As indicate in the letter, staff is meeting with both the City of Oakdale and Washington County on September 12' to continue to work through access related concerns on Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13). As Inwood Avenue is a Washington County facility,the County will continue to take the lead on working with the applicant and both communities on proper access spacing and design. As a condition of approval (Condition#14), staff is recommending that the applicants work with Washington County to address all issues pertaining to street and intersection design for the County roads (CSAH 13 and CSAH 10). In addition, City staff will continue to work with the applicant, Washington County and the City of Oakdale related to access considerations on Inwood Avenue. PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW,ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATIONS In addition to holding a public hearing on the proposed Inwood PUD Concept Plan, the Planning Commission discussed the planned development at great length,making multiple motions to add or amend conditions of approval for the development. As these additional or amended conditions were never included in a broader recommendation to the City Council, staff is asking the Planning Commission to reaffirm the following motions: 1. M/S/P: Williams/Kreimer,move to include Condition#19 to require a 5-foot sideyard setback for all of the single family detached housing,Vote: 4-2,motion carried,with Larson and Dodson voting no. The applicants have noted that the requested 4-foot sideyard setbacks are important to making the Lifestyle Home single family product work. Staff is confident that the reduced setback will work from a land use perspective, as long as the site is carefully engineered to properly account for storm water management. 2. M/S/P: Williams/Dodson,move to add to Condition #6"the location, size and design of the park will be subject to review by the Park Commission. It is recommended that the Park Commission consider the inclusion of a small park area or gathering space in the northwest portion of the development",Vote: 6-0,motion carried unanimously. If affirmed,planning staff will present the Planning Commission's recommendation to the Park Commission at the 9/15/14 meeting. 3. M/S/P: Dodson/Lundgren, move to include Condition#20 that the applicant must work with the City to submit their residential design standards to the City as part of the Preliminary PUD Plan application for the City's use in reviewing building permits, Vote: 6-0,motion carried unanimously. Staff would note that Hans Hagen has identified themselves and the sole builder of the Lifestyle Homes,which is the product that raised greater concern over garage- dominated front elevations. 4. M/S/P: Kreimer/Lundgren(with friendly amendment from Haggard), move to include Condition#20 to change the proposed land use of the area in the northwest comer to Commercial or multi-family with a maximum net density of 15 units per acre,Vote: 5-1, motion carried,with Dodson voting no. BUSINESS ITEM 5B 6 In addition to the above approved motions,there was discussion and/or failed motions pertaining to requiring typical single family lots on the east side of the development and incorporating theming elements into the development. There was also discussion about requiring the greenbelt buffer trail to be located within the western portion of the buffer. However,no formal motion was made related to the trail location. Finally,there was general discussion about the proposed findings listed in the 8/25/14 Staff Report. As no formal motions were made, staff has included the same draft findings that were listed in the previous report. However, staff did include recommended language proposed by Chairman Williams to note that the Concept Plan complies with the general intent of the applicable zoning districts "with the exception of the issues identified in the Staff Report." Based on the above Staff Report and analysis, as well as the analysis completed on 8/25/14, Staff is recommending approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with 17 conditions intended to address future considerations related to the submission of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1) The applicant must obtain permission and consent from the adjoining property owner, Bremer Bank,related to the right-of-way and alignment of the 5t' Street minor collector road in the southeast corner of the site. The final alignment must be determined prior to the submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat applications. 2) Request for flexibility related to lot size, width, setbacks and all other requirements per the City's Zoning Ordinance or Design Standards must be clarified and documented as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat submission. 3) The application for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan approval will include an overall PUD planning document that addresses the flexibility requests noted in the preceding condition and that also specifies the specific design considerations to be used throughout the project area. 4) The Preliminary PUD plans will include a phasing plan for all portions of the development. 5) The Preliminary Development Plans shall include a water tower within the project development area in a location that is deemed acceptable by the City Engineer. As an alternative,the developer may identify an alternate location off-site for the water tower in a location deemed acceptable by the City Engineer provided the ownership of the site is transferred to the City and all required utility connections are constructed in conjunction with the platting of the Inwood PUD. 6) The Preliminary PUD plans shall be updated to include additional park land in the southeastern portion of the site. A larger park area of 5 to 10 acres adjacent to the existing Stonegate Park and with access to 5'Street is the preferred location. The location and size of this park will be subject to review by the Lake Elmo Park Commission. 7) All street and median geometrics must accommodate emergency vehicle access and maintenance. Applicants must demonstrate acceptable turning radii for all uniquely shaped landscape medians and cul-de-sacs. BUSINESS ITEM 5B 7 8) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed district prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 9) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision, and the land is located outside of any restrictive easements. 10)The applicant shall observe all comments and recommendations from the City Engineer documented on the Engineer's report dated August 13,2014. 11)The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans will address review comments and issues that are identified within the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Inwood planned development site. 12)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City clarifying responsibility for all median landscaping and stormwater facilities internal to the single family residential streets. 13)The applicants must work with the City to determine fair and equitable cost share for City costs related to the future signalization of the intersection at 5' Street and Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13). 14)The applicant must work with Washington County to address all review comments documented in the attached report dated 8/20/14 pertaining to access and intersection design for Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13) and 10a' Street(CSAH 10). 15)The applicant must provide sidewalks on both sides of Street B to better serve the single family residential area. 16)Additional trail segments along the east side of Inwood Avenue from 51' Street to 101' Street and along 10a' Street from Inwood Avenue to the Greenbelt Buffer Trail must be incorporated into the plans. 17)The applicant must work with the City to ensure compliance with the City's shoreland provisions and the standards of the SWWD and MN DNR related to shoreland areas of designated public waters. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Inwood PUD Concept Plan: 1) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the intent of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 2) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the general intent of the City's Urban Low Density Residential,Urban High Density Residential and Commercial zoning districts with the exception of the issues identified in the Staff Reports. 3) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. BUSINESS ITEM 5B 8 4) That the Inwood PUD complies with the City's PUD Ordinance, and specifically the identified objectives for the consideration of a Planned Development. 5) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the City's engineering standards with exceptions as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated August 13, 2014. 6) That the master-planning technique utilized in the Inwood PUD Concept Plan provides thoughtful integration of multiple land uses, a variety of housing types and an effective and connected transportation system, allowing for different modes of travel throughout the site. RECCOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with the 17 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff Report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with the findings of fact and 17 conditions of approval as drafted in the Staff Report." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Staff Report, dated 8/25/14(hard copy not included) 2. Updated Inwood PUD Concept Plan, Open Space Plan and Cover Letter 3. City of Oakdale Review memorandum ATTACHMENTS FOUND IN 8/25/14 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA PACKET: 1. Location Map 2. Application Form and Project Narrative 3. Inwood Concept Planning &Design Booklet 4. City Engineer's Review Memorandum,dated 8/13/14 5. Washington County Review Memorandum ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction...................................................................................Planning Staff - Report by Staff..............................................................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission.......................Chair&Commission Members - Discussion by the Commission.........................Chair&Commission Members - Action by the Commission................................Chair&Commission Members BUSINESS ITEM 5B THE CITY OF PLANNING COMMISSION LAKE ELMO DATE: 8/25/14 AGENDA ITEM: 4B—PUBLIC HEARING CASE#2014-42 ITEM: Inwood Planned Unit Development(PUD)—General Concept Plan SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Matt, Community Development Director Nick Johnson, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin,City Engineer Greg Malmquist,Fire Chief Ann Pung-Terwedo,Washington County Matt Moore, South Washington Watershed District Molly Shodeen,MN DNR SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to hold a public hearing for a request from Hans Hagen Homes and Inwood 10, LLC for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Plan for a new mixed- use development on 157 acres of land located at the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 1 Oth Street in Lake Elmo. The concept plan includes 281 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses. Staff is recommending approval of the PUD Concept Plan with 18 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Hans Hagen Homes(John Rask), 941 NE Hillwind Rd. Suite 300,Fridley,MN 55432 and Inwood 10 (Tom Scheutte),LLC,95 S Owasso Blvd. W., St.Paul, MN 55117-7830 Property Owners: Inwood 10, LLC (Tom Scheutte), 95 S Owasso Blvd. W., St.Paul,MN 55117- 7830 Location: Part of Section 33 in Lake Elmo, immediately south of 1 Oth Street(CSAH 10), immediately north of Eagle Point Business Park, immediately east of Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)and immediately west of Stonegate residential subdivision. PIDs: 33.029.21.12.0001, 33.029.21.12.0003, 33.029.21.11.0002 and 33.029.21.11.0001. Request: Application for Concept Plan approval of a Planned Unit Development(PUD) containing 281 single family lots, 144 townhome units, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior living townhome units and multiple sites intended for commercial uses to be named Inwood of Lake Elmo. Existing Land Use and Zoning: Vacant land used for agricultural purposes. Current Zoning: RT —Rural Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR— PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 2 Low Density Residential,HDR—High Density Residential and C—Commercial(all with PUD overlay) Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North: Vacant agricultural land and two residential homes—RR and PF zoning; West: Oak Marsh Golf Course,urban single family subdivision, commercial—City of Oakdale jurisdiction; South: Offices in Eagle Point Business Park(including Bremer Bank facility)—BP zoning;East: Stonegate residential estates subdivision—RE zoning. Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential(2.5—4 units per acre),Urban High Density Residential/Mixed Use(7.5— 15 units per acre) and Commercial. History: The site has historically been used for agricultural purposes.The applicants have submitted a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW)for publication to the Environmental Quality Board(EQB) on September 2nd,commencing the 30- day comment period. Deadline for-Action: Application Complete—8/12/14 60 Day Deadline— 10/10/14 Extension Letter Mailed—No 120 Day Deadline— 12/9/14 Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153—Subdivision Regulations Article 10—Urban Residential Districts(§154.450) Article 12—Commercial Districts(§154.550) Article 16—Planned Unit Development(§154.800) Article 17—Shoreland Management Overlay District REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received an application from Hans Hagen Homes and Inwood 10,LLC for a Planned Unit Development(PUD)Concept Plan for a mixed-use project that will be located on 157 acres of land located on south of 101h Street and east of Inwood Avenue in Lake Elmo. The proposed project will include 281 single-family residential lots, 144 townhouses, 150 multi-family units, 120 senior townhouse units, and approximately 68,814 square feet of commercial/office uses, in addition to storm water facilities,trails,and park areas as depicted on the attached site development plan. While the planned uses for the site generally match those shown on the City's future land use map for the property,the applicant is proposing a slightly different configuration of the various land uses. Most notably,the developer is asking that the commercial area be moved further south along Inwood Avenue to the intersection of 5`h Street and that a small area of multi- family development be allowed at the intersection of Inwood Avenue and 10`h Street. The overall project can be divided up into three distinct areas on the plans, which includes a multi- family area south of 5`h Street,a single-family"lifestyle housing"neighborhood north of 5"' Street, and commercial areas with frontage along Inwood Avenue. Within the residential areas,the developer plans a mix of different housing options, including single-family detached housing, townhouses, senior townhomes, senior multi-family, and standard multi-family housing. The planned single-family areas differ from typical residential neighborhoods in that the lots are smaller than otherwise allowed in the LDR zoning district,with reduced setbacks from the LDR standards as PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 413 3 well. The homes to be built in these areas are intended to appeal to a different market then a typical neighborhood by incorporating common open areas,association-maintained lawns and driveways, and other services, and with amenities that are more typical in a townhouse type of development. As indicated in the application narrative,the developer does not have detailed plans for any of the multi-family portions of the site,and the plans as submitted depict a general development concept for these areas. These structures planned for much of these areas are intended to serve seniors, including a proposed 120-unit senior building that would be located in the southern portion of the site. All of the planned commercial areas are located along Inwood Avenue, and would be separated from the residential development by the internal road system or storm water ponds. At this time,the plans do not call for any vertical mixing of uses; however,the proposed multi-family buildings would be located adjacent to commercial activities, allowing for easy access to goods and services. As opposed to following the City's normal subdivision procedures,the applicants have determined that a planned development approach offers the best method to achieve their development vision for their property. The purpose of the City's PUD ordinance is to provide flexibility in development and zoning standards for large parcels under unified control with the goal of achieving higher quality development. More specifically,the General Concept Plan phase of the PUD procedure allows the applicant to submit a general plan to the City demonstrating his or her basic intent of the development, including general density ranges,location of residential and nonresidential land uses, and location of streets,paths and open space. The purpose of approving the Concept Plan is to provide the applicant with conceptual approval related to the requested flexibilities or variations from the City Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances,or other City standards,before incurring substantial costs related to submitting a full Preliminary Plat application. In terms of procedure,the planned development path is similar to the normal subdivision process in that Preliminary and Final PUD Plan approvals must follow parallel track to Preliminary and Final Plat. However,one critical difference between the planned development process and standard subdivision process is that the PUD Concept Plan phase requires a public hearing and the approval of the City Council. The applicant is proposing to develop the site as a large Planned Unit Development,and is requesting flexibility from the underlying zoning in a number of areas including the following: • The lot sizes and setbacks for the"lifestyle housing"that is planned for most of the single- family detached houses. • The construction of multi-family buildings on a portion of the site that is presently guided for commercial development. It should be noted that the zoning ordinance does allow multi- family buildings in commercial zoning districts as a conditional use. • Moving certain land uses and densities across the entire site. The overall densities that are planned,and the overall size of the commercial,multi-family, and single family areas follow closely to the amount indicated in the Comprehensive Plan; however,the applicant is proposing to move the specific locations of these uses in accordance with the submitted plans. For instance,the City's future land use plan depicts approximately 13 acres of commercial land uses at the intersection of Inwood and 10lb Street.The developer is proposing to keep the overall size of the commercial area the same but extending it further south along Inwood Avenue as opposed to locating single family residential directly adjacent to the County arterial roadway. • Allocating the allowed densities across the entire site instead of reviewing densities on a project-by-project basis. This allows the developer to plan for storm water management, parks, and roadways in the appropriate locations,even though a smaller project within the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 4 planning area may exceed underlying zoning. The density projections for the site are reviewed in greater detail in the latter sections of this report. The flexibility that being requested by the developer is allowed under the City's PUD Ordinance, and the developer has provided a response to the PUD objectives as listed in the Zoning Ordinance as part of the project narrative. The appendix of the submitted Concept Planning&Design Booklet (Attachment#5)also addresses how the proposed planned development is meeting the objectives of the City's PUD Ordinance. Because the project is located at the intersection of two major roadways in Lake Elmo and includes the proposed construction of another,access issues will play a major role in how the site is able to develop. Internal to the site,the developer intends to connect to the planned extension of the 5`h Street minor collector road that will extend through the Boulder Ponds development in the southeastern portion of the site. This road will then turn quickly to the west and eventually intersect Inwood Avenue about 500 feet north of the Eagle Point Business Park. While most of the internal traffic will be accessed via 5fl' Street,there are multiple planned connections along both Inwood Avenue and 10'b Street,which includes a new north/south connection road that will provide a connection between Eagle Point Boulevard and 10' Street. While all of the roads have been designed to comply with City and County requirements,they will be subject to further review and analysis as more detailed plans are prepared for the site. One of the other major features of the project includes the preservation of the wooded area along the eastern project boundary. This area is guided for a green belt/buffer area between the Stonegate neighborhood and denser urban development on the applicant's site. The developer is also proposing a series of trails within the project, including a trail in the eastern green belt/buffer running north and south along a linear park, an east-west trail running across the entire segment of the development connecting the residential area to the commercial areas, as well as the City's planned regional trail section along 5`h Street. In addition to the multiple trail systems, smaller park areas are shown in the southeastern part of the site near the existing Stonegate Park,which are proposed as a logical extension of the existing park area. The other open space areas within the development are predominately being used for storm water management purposes,with larger ponds being located south and east of the commercial area near the intersection of 51h Street and Inwood Avenue. Regarding next steps,the applicant is proposing to bring forward a Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application upon approval of the Concept Plan.Per the PUD Ordinance,the final approval of the proposed planned unit development will result in a zoning change to a specific PUD zoning district, with specific requirements and standards that are specific to the development. If the application moves forward, the change in the base zoning(LDR,HDR, C)of the property would occur at the time of Preliminary Plan approval, and the final PUD zoning with approved flexibility that is specific to the development would be established at Final Plan approval. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES The Inwood site is guided for Urban Low Density Residential,Urban High Density Residential and Commercial land uses in the City's Comprehensive Plan. As noted above,the developer is planning to keep the same general mix of uses on the property,but will be moving the specific location of certain elements to better suit the unique circumstances of this property. The most important consideration in this regard is the location of the commercial area,which is shown in the extreme northwest portion of the site in the City's Comprehensive Plan. While the location of this commercial area at the intersection of two major roadways makes sense from a planning perspective, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 5 in reality access to this area is limited due to spacing requirements along and adjacent to a County road. The developer's plans create a new commercial intersection at Inwood and 5`h Street, which allows these areas to be accessed via a back road system while avoiding any driveways with direct access to either Inwood or I O'h Street. The subsequent arrangement of uses makes logical sense given the access restrictions in place. In addition,it may be problematic to locate single family residential land uses directly adjacent to Inwood Ave. (CSAH 13)as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. Inwood Ave is a County arterial roadway that is anticipated to serve a substantial volume of traffic in the future. From a land use compatibility and noise mitigation standpoint,it makes sense to narrow and extend the commercial uses along Inwood Avenue. The other major break from the underlying Comprehensive Plan is the siting of two multi-family structures at the intersection of 1 Wh Street and Inwood Avenue. Essentially,the developer is proposing to swap a portion of the high density/mixed use area north of Eagle Point Business Park with commercial development at this intersection. The overall balance of uses is therefore not being changed from the Comprehensive Plan, and the proposed reconfiguration appears to work well given the other site constraints,including storm water retention and infiltration requirements,that need to be addressed on the site. In addition,it should be noted that multi-family housing is allowed in the Commercial zoning district as a conditional use.The applicant is proposing to site the multi-family use in this location through the planned development process as opposed to the Conditional Use Permit process. Staff has reviewed the requested variations from the Comprehensive Plan and found that the master-planning of the 157-acre parcel as proposed in the Inwood PUD represents thoughtful planning and siting of the various uses proposed.After evaluating the master-planned development, Staff fords that the development is meeting the overall intent of the land use guidance of the Comprehensive Plan when considering the overall land use goals for the parcel. Regarding the density calculations of the Inwood planned development,the developer has provided density calculations at the request of Staff for the entire site using the City's recently adopted net density definition. These calculations are summarized as follows: Use Area (in acres) Units Net Density(units per acre) Single Family Detached 87.17 281 3.22 Multi-family(south of 23.2 264 11.38 51h Street) Multi-family(corner of 5.16 150 29.1 10`h and Inwood The overall net density for all of the residential areas is 6 units per acre,while on a gross basis this number is 4.9 units per acre. However, all of these numbers are misleading because most of the ponding for the development is located on the outlots adjacent to the commercial parcels,which would add additional open space to the residential calculations. The developer has noted that by utilizing the density ranges permitted under the Comprehensive Plan,the maximum number of residential units that could be built on the site would be 812 units,compared to the planned number of 695 included in the Inwood development. On an overall site development basis,the proposed Inwood PUD would be consistent with the overall range of planned growth according to the Comprehensive Plan. In addition to the requested variation related to the Comprehensive Plan,the other flexibilities requested by the applicant include reduced setback requirements for the single family"lifestyle" housing product offered in the residential neighborhood of the development. The standards for the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 6 LDR zoning district and the requested flexibilities for the Inwood PUD single family lots are as follows: Setback LDR Zoning District Inwood PUD Front Yard 25 Feet 18 Feet to Principal Structure/20 Feet to Garage Interior Side Yard 10 Feet Principal Structure 4 Feet Side/5 Feet Garage Side Rear Yard 20 Feet 20 Feet In addition to setback requirements,the applicants will be requesting flexibility from minimum lot size requirements and lot width requirements,particularly for the Village/Carriage residential product. The Inwood Concept Plan noted that 20%of these homes are slightly under 40 feet in width,while 60%are 50 feet in width and the final 20%are 58 feet in width. The LDR zoning district requires a minimum lot width of 60 feet. By pursuing the PUD process,the applicants are requesting reduced lot sizes,which is allowed under the ordinance. They have noted that the unique housing type,which is completely maintenance free(HOA maintained),requires different design considerations and setbacks.The lot width of the designer product(46 lots in the southeastern potion of the development)are 65 to 85 feet in width,meeting the minimum standards of the LDR district. As an area tabulation of individual lots is not required at Concept Plan level review for a planned development,the applicant has not submitted an area calculation. However,given the size of some of the proposed lots, it is anticipated that many of the lots will be under the LDR zoning district standard of 8,000 square feet. As part of any preliminary PUD plan submittal, staff would require the applicant to submit a complete area tabulation of all the lots proposed in the planned development.Once again,the applicants have noted that in order to achieve a completely HOA maintained neighborhood with a single level product type,flexibility from standard lot width, size and setback requirements are necessary. Based on the residential product presented in the planned development, Staff would offer that the residential product proposed offers a residential product or type that is not currently represented in the Lake Elmo housing market. With regards to the proposed uses in the Inwood PUD, it should be noted that the master-planned development proposes to integrate low density residential,high density residential and commercial uses all within one development effort. Master-planning the entire development as part of a broad, single effort allows for much greater integration of street and pedestrian networks,providing greater connectivity within the development. In addition,planning the entire site allows for improved planning and utilization of storm water facilities for the area. In reviewing the proposed commercial uses included in the Concept Plan, it should be noted that all are allowed in the Commercial zoning district. However, it is anticipated that these uses may change according to market conditions and demand. It would be Staffs expectation that the uses proposed in the Commercial areas of the development would be allowed under the Commercial zoning district. Finally, as the Inwood development is utilizing the PUD process, it is the burden of the applicant to explain how the proposed development meets one or more of the City's identified objectives (§154.801)related to planned developments. In order to address this question,the applicant has provided a thorough explanation of which objectives are met within the back section of the Project Narrative(Attachment#3—Also found in PUD Design Planning&Concepts Booklet). In the judgment of Staff,the proposed development meets the criteria for the following identified PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 7 objectives: A)Innovation in land techniques,B)Promotion of integrated land uses,D) Accommodation of housing of all types with convenient access to employment and/or commercial facilities and H)Creation of more efficient provision of public utilities and services, lessened demand on transportation,etc. Arguments could be made for additional objectives being achieved. Staff was most confident in the aforementioned objectives being met. Per the City's Subdivision Ordinance,the applicant is required to provide parkland dedication in an amount equal to 10%of land developed residentially, fees equal to the market value of 10%of the land, or some combination thereof. The acceptable parkland solution is at the discretion of the City. Based on the submitted area calculations on the Inwood PUD Concept Plan,there is 78.1 acres of single family residential area and 29.5 acres of multi-family residential area,totaling 107.6 acres. Therefore,the required land dedication for the residential areas would be 10.7 acres. The applicants have noted that 12.2 acres of public parkland is provided, going above the required dedication amount. However,the outlots containing area labeled park also contain storm water facilities and one smaller wetland. In advance of preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan, it is recommended that the applicant work with Staff to clarify the correct amount of parkland provided given the City's criteria for eligible parkland. In addition to the land dedication requirements for the residential areas of the Inwood planned development,the applicant would be required to submit a fee of$4,500 per acre of land developed for commercial purposes. Based on the area calculations,there is currently 27.7 acres of land being developed commercially,which would result in a parkland fee of$124,650. In developing more detailed plans for the Inwood development in the future,staff will work with the applicant to determine the correct parkland dedication amounts. In terms of the parkland provided in the Inwood planned development,the majority of the park areas are found in the southeast comer of the site adjacent to existing Stonegate Park and on the east side of the development with the linear greenbelt park. It should be noted that there is park proposed on both sides of the 5"' Street minor collector road. The smaller park area on the southern side of the collector is intended to serve the townhome area immediately to the west. The park area north of the collector,along with the linear greenbelt park,could easily serve the single family residential portion of the development. While at this time it appears that the total required parkland dedication amount has been met by the applicant, Staff would recommend enlarging the park area north of 5 h Street adjacent to existing Stonegate Park to an overall size of 5-10 acres. Increased park area in this location would give the City the ability to design more usable recreation space where organized recreation activities,such as baseball or soccer,could be held. Given the number of residential units proposed in the development, Staff believes that a larger park area is appropriate in this case. In addition,it is likely that the park should be served by an access off of 5�h Street with a small parking area to serve the overall park. If the applicants have indeed met their land dedication requirements, Staff would recommend that the applicants be given credit or compensated for any parkland provided above the dedication amount. Credit and compensation could be achieved by reducing the parkland dedication fees due related to commercial development on the site by the equal market value of the land the City receives above the dedication amount. In order to get further direction regarding the appropriate park area for the development, Staff is recommending that the applicant present their plans to the Park Commission at their next regularly scheduled meeting,which is on September 15`h, 2014. It should also be noted that two portions of the site are subject to shoreland rules. The northwest comer of the site is located within the shoreland district of Armstrong Lake,which is located in the jurisdictions of both Oakdale and Lake Elmo. In addition,an unnamed stream or tributary exists in the southwest corner of the site running towards Eagle Point Business Park.To review the proposed PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 8 development in and around these areas, Staff completed a review of the Concept Plan against the City's Shoreland Management Overlay District(Article 17 of Zoning Code). Regarding the northwest potion of the site,the proposed structures are not in close proximity to the Ordinary High Water Level(OHWL)of Armstrong Lake. In terms of impervious surface, sewered lots without riparian dedication are subject to a maximum amount of impervious surface of 30%of lot area.This standard would apply to the commercial and multi-family residential uses proposed in the northwest and western portion of the site,as the shoreland district boundary is depicted on the Concept Plan with a bold dashed black line. In addition, Staff does have some concern about the amount of impervious coverage in Lots 7-14,Block 11. These lots may need to be revised to comply with the City's shoreland standards. In addition to Armstrong Lake,the unnamed tributary flowing through the southeastern portion of the site,which travels to Wilmes Lake in Woodbury,is considered a protected water under DNR classification. The applicants have provided a significant buffer around the unnamed tributary. The City's shoreland provisions require a structure setback of 75 feet from tributaries for sewered lots with no riparian buffering requirement.However,the MN DNR and South Washington Watershed District may provide additional review on this area. There may be a concern about the proximity of the commercial use labeled"pharmacy". Regarding all the shoreland issues, Staff would recommend that the applicant work with the City to ensure compliance with the City's shoreland provisions and the standards of the SWWD and MN DNR as a condition of approval(Condition#18). REVIEW AND ANALYSIS City Staff has reviewed the proposed Inwood PUD Concept Plan,which has gone through multiple iterations in advance of the formal application being made to the City. In general,the proposed plan will meet all applicable City requirements for PUD Concept Plan approval,and any deficiencies or additional work that is needed is noted for the purpose of inclusion in the review record. In addition there are several things happening in and around the Inwood planned development that will have an impact on the project, including the construction of 5`b Street with appropriate access spacing and alignment,as well as the potential siting of a future water tower on the site. Given that some of these efforts are still underway, Staff recognizes that some modifications will be necessary from PUD Concept Plan phase to PUD Preliminary Plan phase. The City has received a detailed list of comments from the City Engineer and Fire Chief,in addition to comments by the Washington County Public Works,all of which are attached for consideration by the Commission. In addition to the general comments that have been provided in the preceding sections of this report, Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider the issues and comments related to the following discussion areas as well: • Comprehensive Plan. In the judgment of Staff,the proposed planned development is consistent with the land use categories guided for this site as planned in the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. The proposed amount of residential growth is consistent with the range of residential development as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. In addition,the land uses as proposed are generally consistent with the Urban Low Density Residential-LDR and Urban High Density Residential-HDR zoning districts. Finally,the total area intended for commercial uses on the site matches the amount planned under the Comprehensive Plan,with the locational changes noted as an acceptable variation through the PUD process. Other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan relate to the Inwood PUD Concept Plan as follows: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 413 9 o Transportation. The City's transportation plan calls for the construction of a minor collector road(5`h Street)that will connect the eastern and western portions of the I- 94 Corridor. Staff views this road as a critical piece of the transportation infrastructure that is needed to serve the densities that have been planned for this area. The applicant has incorporated the right-of-way at the width necessary to construct the minor collector as part of its PUD Concept Plan. As proposed,the provided segment of 5`' Street will connect from Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)to the Boulder Ponds development southeast of the site,eventually leading through the Savona subdivision to Keats Avenue(CSAH 19). Completion of this segment of the minor collector road will provide the infrastructure needed to properly distribute automobile traffic throughout Stage 1 of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. cl Parks. The City's Park Plan identifies the subject property as a needed location for a neighborhood park. Given the amount of residential growth proposed for the site,it makes sense to provide enough parkland to adequately serve this portion of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area.In addition to a neighborhood park as guided by the Comprehensive Plan,it should also be noted that the eastern portion of the site is guided for a 100-foot linear park known as the greenbelt buffer.The greenbelt trail provided on the eastern portion of the development is consistent with the guidance of the Comprehensive Plan. o Water. Water will eventually be provided to this area via a future extension of the municipal system along Inwood Avenue. The Inwood planned development will be able to be served under the City's current agreement with the City of Oakdale until the Inwood watermain extension is completed in 2015. It also must be noted that the subject property is identified as a future location for one of the two water towers needed to serve the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. As a condition of approval (Condition#5), Staff recommends that the applicant provide a location that meets the approval of the City Engineer within the development to site the necessary water tower. As an alternative,the applicant can provide the City with an alternative site, as long as the location works from a hydrological standpoint and meets the approval of the City Engineer. o Sanitary Sewer. The Inwood planned development will be able to connect into the existing sanitary sewer system within the Eagle Point Business Park. While this area is presently served via an interconnected system with the City of Oakdale, all of Section 34 will eventually be connected to the regional interceptor located immediately south of the business park. As noted in the City Engineer's memo,the proposed sanitary sewer connection will need to be evaluated for capacity and overall system design. o Phasing. The Inwood planned development is located within the Stage I phasing area of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area.Therefore,the proposed development is consistent with the City's anticipated phasing of growth. Zoning. The proposed base zoning for the Inwood site will be split between the Urban Low Density Residential—LDR,the Urban High Density Residential—HDR,and Commercial— C zoning districts. However, approval of PUD Final Plan will result in a zoning change to a specific PUD Zoning District, recording all of the permitted variations, such as minimum lot size and setbacks, from the Zoning requirements of the base zoning district. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 413 10 • Subdivision Requirements. The City's Subdivision Ordinance includes a fairly lengthy list of standards that must be met by all new subdivisions, and include requirements for blocks, lots,easements, erosion and sediment control,drainage systems,monuments, sanitary sewer and water facilities, streets, and other aspects of the plans. The City will work with the applicant to ensure that all standards specified in the Subdivision Ordinance are met,or that the appropriate variation is requested through the PUD Preliminary Plan. • Concept Phasing.The developer has indicated that the first phases of the project will be the single-family areas,with the multi-family and commercial areas proceeding based on market conditions. The narrative notes that Hans Hagen Homes will be the exclusive builder of the single family area,while Inwood 10,LLC will develop the commercial and multi-family areas as the market permits.In addition, Staff is requesting that the developer will be asked to provide a more specific phasing plan with the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD submissions(Condition#4). • Infrastructure. The developer will be required to construct all streets, sewer,water,storm water ponds, and other infrastructure necessary to serve the development. Storm water facilities should be platted as outlots and deeded to the city for maintenance purposes. Adequate access to public storm water facilities must be provided. • Tree Preservation and Protection. Based upon the limited tree cover of the site, it is possible that the applicant may not be required to complete a Tree Preservation Plan.If the applicant can demonstrate that significant trees on the site will not be negatively impacted by development activity,they would be allowed to submit a Woodland Evaluation Report in lieu of a Tree Preservation Plan. In addition to the trees along the eastern boundary,there are only two relatively small stands of trees on the site,located in the southwest and southeast corners of the site respectively.The Inwood PUD Concept Plan does not show development activity over these areas. However,potential impacts to existing trees will be better understood at the preliminary plat level with the submission of a grading plan for the development. Overall,the details at the preliminary plat stage will require a greater level of detail concerning trees on the site. • Green BeldBuffer. The Comprehensive Plan identifies the area on the east side of the Inwood planned development adjacent to the Stonegate residential subdivision as a green belYbuffer space with a minimum width of 100 feet.As proposed in the Inwood PUD Concept Plan,the applicant is utilizing this space for the continuation of trail corridor from the Boulder Ponds planned development in the south. As proposed,the design of the greenbelt trail is consistent with City planning efforts to date. In addition, it should be noted that the applicants are proposing to maintain a significant amount of existing trees along the eastern boundary of the site,adding to the value and aesthetic of the proposed linear park area. The existing trees include a significant amount of evergreen species,which should provide ample year round screening to many portions of the development. It should be noted that the distance maintained between private lots and the Stonegate neighborhood exceeds 100 feet in many areas,where separation distances of 140 to over 200 feet are common. However, it should be noted that Lots 27 and 28, Block 7 do encroach on the minimum 100- foot buffer area. As a condition of approval(Condition#12), Staff would recommend that the two lots noted be revised to maintain the 100-foot buffer requirement. With the exception of the two lots noted, Staff believes that that green belt/buffer requirements of the Comprehensive Plan have been met,and often exceeded,by the applicant. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 413 11 • Streets and Transportation. The Inwood PUD Concept Plan includes a substantial portion of the 5`h Street minor collector road,as well as an extensive internal street network proposed to serve the mixed-use development. From a conceptual level review of the street system,it appears that the proposed internal public streets meet the City's baseline subdivision requirements and City engineering standards.The right-of-way of local streets are 60 feet in width and local roads are 28 feet in width from curb to curb. In addition to the local road provided,the Inwood planned development includes a series of private streets and driveways to serve multi-family and commercial properties.The private streets and driveways as proposed are primarily accessed off 5`h Street and Street D. Significant information regarding the proposed transportation network can be found in the City Engineer's memo(Attachment #6). In addition to the Engineer's review comments, staff offers the following additional comments related to streets: o 5"Street. The City Engineer presents a significant amount of design requirements related to the 5`h Street minor collector road in his review memorandum. In addition to his comments, Staff would highlight the following: ■ Alignment. The proposed alignment should meet Washington County's specifications for the touchdown on Inwood Ave. (CSAH 13). However,the alignment at the Boulder Ponds development includes slight additional impact to the Bremer Bank property,necessitating an additional 2,967 square feet of right-of-way from the Bremer site.In order to proceed with the alignment as shown,the applicant will need written permission from Bremer Bank (Condition#1). ■ Yh Street and Inwood Avenue Signalization. Washington County will require signalization for the 5`'Street and Inwood Ave.intersection at some point in the future. Given the anticipated traffic volumes generated by the Inwood planned development, Staff would recommend that the City require the applicant to participate financially in the City's share of the traffic signal costs. As a condition of approval(Condition#14), Staff is recommending that the applicant work with the City to determine a fair and reasonable cost share for the City's portion of the costs to signalize the 5`h Street and Inwood intersection. o Residential Streets. For the single family neighborhood,the applicant is proposing unique street designs. The streets of the single family areas include Low Impact Development(LID)techniques of utilizing center islands and medians to incorporate infiltration and storm water management facilities allowing for enhanced and innovative storm water management within close proximity to streets and residential lots.The center medians will also allow for additional landscaping and pedestrian spaces, as demonstrated in the Concept Planning and Design Booklet(Attachment #5).It should also be noted that the islands would include a one way street design, requiring vehicle traffic to move in circular direction around the island. Due to the unique design of these streets,the City will require additional geometric details and exhibits demonstrating successful turning movements throughout the neighborhood streets. As a condition of approval(Condition#7), Staff is recommending that these details be submitted as part of the Preliminary PUD Plan.Additional details needed for review must address the review comments from the City Engineer documented in the review memorandum dated 8/13/14(Attachment#6).Finally, it should be noted that Street C and Cul-De-Sac L exceed the maximum length of cul-de-sac for PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 12 sewered developments(600 feet)per the City's Subdivision Ordinance.The Engineer has recommended that this road section be revised to connect interior to the development. This could most likely be accomplished by connecting Street C to Neighborhood Street E. • Sidewalks and Trails. The proposed Inwood planned development offers a substantial amount and variety of pedestrian and bicycle facilities in the form of sidewalks and trails, offering alternative modes of transport throughout the development. Staff has the following comments pertaining to sidewalks and trails: o Sidewalks. All of the major streets serving the single family residential area have sidewalks on at least one side of the streets, and in some case both sides. In addition, the applicant is planning unique street design with center medians. The Concept Planning and Design Booklet note that these median areas include additional pedestrian facilities to access residential homes. However,this level of detail is not currently provided for all the individual islands and medians at the Concept Plan stage. Staff would recommend that this detail be provided to better understand how these residential areas are being served. In addition,one recommendation(Condition #16)that Staff would make is to include sidewalks on both sides of Street B,as this street is serving as a neighborhood collector for the single family residential neighborhood. Finally,the mutli-family and commercial areas often have direct sidewalk access to the streets. Staff would recommend that the applicant provide pedestrian access to the best extent possible to both mutli-family and commercial uses, as one of the benefits of a master-planned development is to ensure broad connectivity in between the various land uses included in the plan. o Trails. The applicants are proposing an effective system of trails to serve the planned development. In addition to the greenbelt linear park trail on the east side of the development,the applicant is planning a central east-west trail contained mostly in open space areas across the entire development.This should allow the development to achieve residential neighborhoods with easy access to employment and commercial services,resulting in an integrated development with a mix of uses.In order to augment the proposed trails provided in the Concept Plat,staff recommends that additional trail segments be provided within the Inwood Avenue and 101h Street right-of-ways(Condition#17). Staff recommends that the Inwood Avenue trail segment on the east side of the road extend from 501 Street to 10'h Street(CSAH 10). In addition,the I Oh Street(CSAH 10)trail segment should connect from Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)to the Greenbelt Buffer Trail at the northeast corner of the development.These trail segments would ensure proper connection of the proposed trails and offer increased connectivity and access. • City Engineer Review. The City Engineer has provided the Planning Department with a detailed comment letter(Attachment#6)dated August 13, 2014 as a summary of his review of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan. Staff has incorporated the more significant issues identified by the Engineer as part of the recommended conditions of approval, and has also included a general condition(Condition#10)that all issues identified by the City Engineer must be addressed by the applicant prior to approval of a the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat. • Washington County Public Works Review. Ann Pung-Terwedo of Washington County Public Works has submitted a review memorandum that focuses on the proposed street PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 13 connections of the Inwood PUD to the surrounding arterial street network. Given that both Inwood avenue(CSAH 13)and 10`h Street(CSAH 10) are County arterial roadways that will directly serve the development,there are many considerations related to access management and intersection design that the applicants must consider in planning out the internal street system. The review memorandum from Washington County is found in Attachment#8. Staff is recommending that the applicants work with Washington County to address all review comments in the memo as a condition of approval(Condition#15).Finally, it should be noted that the Inwood planned development site is within proximity to one of the planned stations for the planned Gateway Corridor transit facility. In the judgment of Staff,the development as proposed would be compatible with elements or characteristics of transit- oriented development(TOD), offering further support for the Inwood Concept Plan. • Fire Chief Review The Lake Elmo Fire Chief,Greg Malmquist, submitted a review letter for the proposed planned development. In the letter,he highlights the importance of an effective street naming system that follows the County system and has been utilized by the City. In addition,there are comments submitted on the proper location of fire hydrants and proper street design to allow for effective turning movements for fire apparatus and other emergency vehicles. Finally,he notes that many of the structures included in the plan may be subject to fire sprinkling requirements per State Building and Fire Codes. • Watershed Districts. The project area lies within the South Washington Watershed District. The applicants have started working with Matt Moore,the SWWD engineer,on preparing a stormwater management plan that will meet the treatment,rate and volume requirements for the proposed development. As a condition of approval(Condition#8), all specific development projects will need to comply with applicable watershed district requirements. As proposed,the project will impact man-made constructed wetlands on the site that were created related to agricultural activity.The applicant is currently working through the mitigation requirements for these impacts with the watershed district(which is the responsible government unit for wetland issues). • Environmental Review. Based upon the proposed scope of the Concept Plan,the project will meet the threshold for a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet(EAW), as the proposed development will exceed the threshold of 300 residential units. The developer has prepared a draft EAW that will be distributed for public comment starting on September 2, 2014. No subdivision of land can occur until this review is complete;however,the developer may proceed with simultaneous reviews at its own risk. • Design Review. Based on the proposed uses within the PUD Concept Plan,multiple structures within the Inwood Development will be subject to design and architectural review, including all multi-family residential(apartments, condos, senior living)and commercial buildings.Design and architectural review will be performed at Preliminary and Final PUD Plan stage for all applicable structures. • Theming. Staff has distributed the Branding and Theming Study completed by Damon Farber and Associates to the applicants previously. In completing a preliminary landscape plan for the site, staff would recommend that the applicants consider the inclusion of various theming elements and amenities identified in the plan for various locations within the development.For example, the 5`h Street and Inwood Avenue Intersection presents a gateway opportunity for the City. Utilizing some of the elements described in the theming study would help the development and City achieve unique design that is consistent with the theme that the City is attempting to augment and achieve as private development moves forward. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 14 Based on the above Staff Report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with multiple conditions intended to address future considerations related to the submission of a PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat application. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions ofApprova[: 1) The applicant must obtain permission and consent from the adjoining property owner, Bremer Bank,related to the right-of-way and alignment of the 5`h Street minor collector road in the southeast comer of the site. The final alignment must be determined prior to the submittal of PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat applications. 2) Request for flexibility related to lot size, width, setbacks and all other requirements per the City's Zoning Ordinance or Design Standards must be clarified and documented as part of the PUD Preliminary Plan and Preliminary Plat submission. 3) The application for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan approval will include an overall PUD planning document that addresses the flexibility requests noted in the preceding condition and that also specifies the specific design considerations to be used throughout the project area. 4) The Preliminary PUD plans will include a phasing plan for all portions of the development. 5) The Preliminary Development Plans shall include a water tower within the project development area in a location that is deemed acceptable by the City Engineer. As an alternative,the developer may identify an alternate location off-site for the water tower in a location deemed acceptable by the City Engineer provided the ownership of the site is transferred to the City and all required utility connections are constructed in conjunction with the platting of the Inwood PUD. 6) The Preliminary PUD plans shall be updated to include additional park land in the southeastern portion of the site. A larger park area of 5 to 10 acres adjacent to the existing Stonegate Park and with access to 5`h Street is the preferred location. The location and size of this park will be subject to review by the Lake Elmo Park Commission. 7) All street and median geometrics must accommodate emergency vehicle access and maintenance. Applicants must demonstrate acceptable turning radii for all uniquely shaped landscape medians and cul-de-sacs. 8) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed district prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 9) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision, and the land is located outside of any restrictive easements. 10)The applicant shall observe all comments and recommendations from the City Engineer documented on the Engineer's report dated August 13,2014. 11)The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans will address review comments and issues that are identified within the Environmental Assessment Worksheet for the Inwood planned development site. 12)Lots 27 and 28,Block 7 must be revised to maintain the minimum 100-foot greenbelt buffer requirement along the eastern portion of the planned development. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 15 13)The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City clarifying responsibility for all median landscaping and stormwater facilities internal to the single family residential streets. 14)The applicants must work with the City to determine fair and equitable cost share for City costs related to the future signalization of the intersection at 5"' Street and Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). 15)The applicant must work with Washington County to address all review comments documented in the attached report dated 8/20/14 pertaining to access and intersection designs for Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)and 10`h Street(CSAH 10). 16)The applicant must provide sidewalks on both sides of Street B to better serve the single family residential area. 17)Additional trail segments along the east side of Inwood Avenue from 5th Street to 10'h Street and along 10`h Street from Inwood Avenue to the Greenbelt Buffer Trail must be incorporated into the plans. 18)The applicant must work with the City to ensure compliance with the City's shoreland provisions and the standards of the SWWD and MN DNR related to shoreland areas of designated public waters. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Inwood PUD Concept Plan: 1) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the intent of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 2) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the general intent of the City's Urban Low Density Residential,Urban High Density Residential and Commercial zoning districts. 3) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan complies with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 4) That the Inwood PUD complies with the City's PUD Ordinance,and specifically the identified objectives for the consideration of a Planned Development. 5) That the Inwood PUD Concept Plan is consistent with the City's engineering standards with exceptions as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated August 13, 2014. 6) That the master-planning technique utilized in the Inwood PUD Concept Plan provides thoughtful integration of multiple land uses, a variety of housing types and an effective and connected transportation system, allowing for different modes of travel throughout the site. RECCOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with the 18 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff Report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan with the findings of fact and conditions of approval as drafted in the Staff Report." PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B 16 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Application Form 3. Project Narrative 4. Inwood PUD Concept Plan w/Details 5. Inwood PUD Concept Planning&Design Booklet 6. City Engineer's Review Memorandum, dated 8/13/14 7. Fire Chiefs Review Memorandum, dated 8/19/14 8. Washington County Review Memorandum,dated 8/20/14 ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction........................................................................................Planning Staff - Report by Staff...................................................................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission............................Chair&Commission Members - Open the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Close the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair& Commission Members - Action by the Commission.....................................Chair& Commission Members PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4B _N4 e' er ro _ Jf y- A � Oak Marsh Golf Course • I I ' II Y 7 j •e: -s .®gila 6 obe.Geo-ye. - e•. SUSS €y .Get app� g, _ � � _ � _ •�• _ Ae •r . IG 6'�s ss po. and the G15 U e C•mm ni Location Map: Inwood 10 PUD THE CITY OF jJA K E ELMO o 250 500 1,000 Feet Inwood 10 PUD I i i I i I Data Scource: Washington County, MN 1"=500' 8-15-2014 Dale Received: rl 11: CITY c W 651-747-3900 Received By: LAKE ELMO 3800 m Avenue North Permit: ,�� Lakea E Ellmo,,MN 55042 LAND USE APPLICATION ❑ Comprehensive Plan ❑ Zoning District Amend ❑ Zoning Text Amend ❑ Variance'(see below) ❑ Zoning Appeal ❑ Conditional Use Permit(C.U.P.) ❑ Flood Plain C.U.P. ❑ Interim Use Permit(I.U.P.) ❑ Excavating/Grading ❑ Lot Line Adjustment ❑ Minor Subdivision ❑ Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan P PUD Concept Plan ❑ PUD Preliminary Plan ❑ PUD Final Plan Applicant: Q .ct _ rh.� 1` ��'►woo� lD LLB Address: AJE , �, U -�� 3 JJ �ri� h'1 A/ SS�y3 7 Phone# Email Address: k a +L Fee Owner: e12 / LL Address: qS C2 Q/A 1-/ S'� a ��✓ SS^/f 7 Phone# — L-1 4K Email Address:-SSe ✓ -E4t z►'fr2nCZ -t c� •ca^- Property Location(Address and Complete(long)Legal Description: NIC yy Detailed Reason for Request: Se- A41clz •Variance Requests: As outlined in Section 301.060 C.of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code,the applicant must demonstrate practical difficu 'es before a variance can be granted. The practical difficulties related to this application are as follows: In signing this application,I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning ordinance and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional application expense. Signature of applicant: Dale: _1/V Signature of fee owner: Date: %ren September 4,2014 Ornc Kyle Matt City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue Ni,rth Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE: In Wood—Response to I'Ivining Commission Comments Dear Mr. Klatt, In follow up to the Planning Commission meeting on August 25,2014, we would like to respond to comments regarding density, lot size, and setbacks. The following table summarizes our response: Issue Response Single Family Lots The lot count has been reduced from 281 to 273 to preserve wetlands and provide more parkland. j Single Family Gross Density is 2.58 units per acre. Net density is 3.14 units per acre excluding Density onds and City parkland. Including parkland,the density is 2.7 units per acre. Comprehensive Plan The City's Plan allows a density of 2.5 to 3.99 units per acre. The midpoint of Density the density range is 3.25 Wa. Inwood is on the lower end of the density range. PUD Lot Size Section 154.802 F.of the PUD Ordinance states that the Council may reduce the Standards lot area and width of individual lots from the base zoning district,provided an equal amount of open s ace or amenities is provided elsewhere. Lot Size Average lot size in 1nWood is 11,677 square feet when you include all the open space areas (excluding public parks and right-of-way). Standard zoning minimum lot size is 7,500 square feet. Setbacks Section 154.802 E.of the PUD Ordinance states that the PUD may provide for a reduction or elimination tion of required setbacks. Open Space PUD Ordinance Requires 20 percent open space. Inwood provides 31%open s ace. As outlined in our application and the informadun provided above, the InWood neighborhood meets the criteria necessary for the City to approve a PUD. The project is consistent with the City's Land Use Guide Plan and the PUD zoning ordinance, If you have any questions on our project,please feel free to contact me at (763)586-7202. or at ircisk@hanliagnhonies.com. hanhagnhomes.corn. Sincerely, -166 Rask Vice President of Land Development i in 10011)a oshagenhomes.cotn 941 1-1111 mind Road NE, Suite 300 • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • Phove 763/586-72o0 Fax 763/572-94 17 I I ne H 'M We august It, 2014 Homes Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE: Inwood Creek Mixed Use Neighborhood Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council, Inwood 10 LLC and Hans Hagen Homes are proposing a mixed use development on approximately 157 acres located at the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 10`h Street. The project will be known as Inwood Creek and will consist of a mix of single family homes, townhomes,multi-family, and commercial. Inwood Creek blends different housing styles and commercial uses in a coordinated approach. The neighborhood design provides the convenience of retail goods, services, and jobs in a walkable community. The sustainable community design includes efficient utilization of public infrastructure,Low Impact Development (LID)techniques, including the reuse of storm water,and open spaces consisting of linear parks and trail system. Land Use Guide Plan The City's Land Use Guide Plan identities a mix of Commercial, Urban Low Density, and Urban High Density land uses on the subject property. The City of Lake Elmo's 1-94 Corridor Development Staging Plan map(July 2012)places the subject property in the first phase of development. Inwood Creek will include approximately: 1)281 single family lots(Lifestyle Homes), 2) 144 townhomes, 3) 150 multi-family units, and 4) 120 senior townhome units. The commercial uses will consist of approximately 63,814 square feet of commercial/office uses. Commercial Neighborhood The commercial portion of the neighborhood is a key component in creating the neighborhood identity, as well as providing residents with convenient access to goods and services. Residents of the Inwood Creek neighborhood will be able to walk to shopping, restaurants, and other retail establishments. Conceptual buildings and site designs are included on the concept plan to provide an illustration of how the commercial district could be developed. Final building plans for the commercial property will be customized to meet the needs of each occupant. A final PUD plan will be submitted to the City prior to construction of any of the commercial uses. info@hanshagenhomes.com 941 Hillwind Road NE, Suite 300 • Fridley, Minnesota 55432 • Phone 763/586-7200 Fax 763/572-9417 Multi-Family Neighborhood The multi-family areas of the neighborhood will consist of a mix of townhomes, apartments, and senior housing. These housing options are located in areas designated for higher density in the City's Land Use Plan. The Inwood Creek neighborhood is ideally located for multi- family housing because of its proximity to nearby jobs,transportation,and convenient neighborhood shopping. There are no specific plans for the multi-family portion of the neighborhood at this time. Conceptual buildings and site designs are illustrated on the concept plan to give an idea of how the multi-family neighborhoods could be developed. A final PUD plan would be submitted to the City prior to construction of any of the multi-family land. Single Family Neighborhood The single family neighborhood includes"Lifestyle Homes"that meet the increasing demand for one-level living with association maintenance. The Lifestyle Homes provide the benefits of a single family home, with all the conveniences of a townhome. The association maintenance of lawn areas and snow removal provides the homeowner with the freedom to travel, own a winter or summer home,or more time for recreation. Inwood Creek homeowners may select"ale-carte"services through the homeowner association,such as gutter cleaning,spring and fall clean-up, and other services to assist in the upkeep and maintenance of the outdoor spaces. Hans Hagen Homes will be the exclusive builder of the single family neighborhood,and will assist each buyer in selecting and designing a home that fits their particular need. Individual homeowners have the ability to choose from a wide variety of plans, exterior materials, including extensive use of brick and stone,architectural features, and landscape designs. This process creates variety and interest in the architecture of the neighborhood. The Lifestyle Homes feature private outdoor patio spaces,a private yard for gardening, plentiful landscaping,and a homeowners association to take care of the exterior spaces. While the yard areas are maintained by the association,these homes sit on individual lots. This type of home with association maintenance requires flexibility from standard single family zoning requirements. The setbacks for these homes are: l)20-foot front yard,2)4- foot side yard,and 3)20-foot rear yard. A minimum separation of 22 feet will be provided between the garage door and any sidewalk to accommodate the parking of vehicles without interfering with the use of the sidewalk. The association is responsible to maintain the yards, and has easements over the adjacent lots for access and maintenance of homes. PUD Zoning The Inwood Creek neighborhood will be processed as a PUD. The PUD provides flexibility necessary for the construction of the Lifestyle Homes. The PUD will also permit the mixing of the commercial and multi-family uses. Currently, the northwest corner of the property is guided for Commercial. Because of access limitations onto Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13) and I O'h Street,the commercial is being moved to the south adjacent to 51" Street. PUD Zoning Objectives Section 154.801 of the Zoning Ordinance states that the City should consider whether one or more of the objectives listed below is being achieved when approving a Planned Unit Development(the applicant's response is provided after each objective in italics). A. Innovation in land development techniques that may be more suitable for a given parcel than conventional approaches. The City's Land Use Guide Plan calls for a mix of uses on the Inwood Creek property. Inwood Creek arranges commercial, multi-family and single family uses in a manner that provides for appropriate vehicle access,pedestrian connections, and transitions between uses. Berms, water features,public parks, opens spaces, and landscaping will establish transitions between different land uses. The PUD also incorporates Low Impact Development(LID)street designs that provide for enhanced storm water management. B. Promotion of integrated land uses,allowing for a mixture of residential, commercial,and public facilities. Lifestyle Homes on single family lots are located north of proposed 5'h Street on the eastern side oj'the neighborhood. A public park lies between the Lifestyle Homes and existing single family homes in Stonegate. The west side of the property adjacent to Inwood Avenue is designed for multifamily and commercial uses. Significant water features, berms, and landscaping lie between the Lifestyle Homes and the multifamily and commercial uses. Townhomes and a senior residential facility are planned between 5th Street and the Eagle Point Office Park with the property adjacent to Inwood planed for commercial uses. The requested PUD provides for the integration of these compatible land uses. C. Provision of more adequate, usable, and suitably located open space,recreational amenities and other public facilities than would otherwise be provided under conventional land development techniques. The Inwood Creek neighborhood incorporates a variety of open space and recreational amenities. The linear park on the east side of Inwood Creek provides open space between the Stonegate single family neighborhood and Inwood Creek, as well as a trail connection to existing Stonegate public park. The linear park and trail system extends through the neighborhood to the commercial district of Inwood Creek. Trails and sidewalks are also provided along 5'h Street with connections to the linear park. D. Accommodation of housing of all types with convenient access to employment opportunities and/or commercial facilities;and especially to create additional opportunities for senior and affordable housing. The Inwood Creek neighborhood provides convenient access to existing employment opportunities located in the adjacent Eagle Point Office Park, as well as nearby locations in Oakdale, Woodbury, and Lake Elmo. As discussed earlier, the neighborhood will provide townhouses, multifamily, senior, and single family homes. E. Preservation and enhancement of important environmental features through careful and sensitive placement of buildings and facilities. The property consists almost entirely of tilled agricultural fields and contains no significant environmental features. The trees along the east property line will be saved and incorporated into a buffer/park area. F. Preservation of historic buildings, structures or landscape features. There are no historic buildings or significant landscape features found on the property. G. Coordination of architectural styles and building forms to achieve greater compatibility within the development and surrounding land uses. As discussed above, the purpose of the PUD is to provide for the appropriate mixing and intergration of land uses. The architecture of the Lifestyle Homes will be controlled through standards imposed by Hans Hagen Homes. The opportunity for the buyer to choose from a verity of architectural styles,.features, colors, and materials will create visual interest and establish the unique neighborhood character of Inwood Creek. Final building plans for the commercial or multi family properties will be completed as occupants of Inwood Creek are designated. Future buildings on these parcels would conform to applicable City standards. H. Creation of more efficient provision of public utilities and services, lessened demand on transportation,and the promotion of energy resource conservation. Master planning this neighborhood provides for the efficient layout and design ofpublic utilities and services. The neighborhood will provide important connections to Eagle Point Boulevard, Inwood Avenue, and 10'h Street. It will also provide the connection of 5'h Street through the project site. I. Allowing the development to operate in concert with a redevelopment plan in certain areas of the City and to ensure the redevelopment goals and objectives will be achieved. The project does not include any redevelopment. I Higher standards of site and building design than would otherwise be provided under conventional land development technique. As discussed above, the neighborhood provides for the efficient layout and extension of public infrastructure and the integration of land uses. Low Impact Development (LID)street designs also provide an attractive streetscape while minimizing storm water runoff. PUD flexibility is needed to establish housing choices that are not currently available in Lake Elmo. Conclusions The Inwood Creek neighborhood meets the criteria necessary for the City to approve a PUD for the project. The project is consistent with the City's Land Use Guide Plan and the objectives of the PUD zoning ordinance. If you have any questions on our project,please feel free to contact nie at (76 3) 586- 7202,or at jrask@l_lanhagenhomes.com. Sincerely, -51 John Rask Vice President of Land Development 1 I � III a� r 'BMW try J Jrn�rrfi. �ic+�Q �wt�i�Pr,M�� ��r1 ;1; ;k1��7 ..�• '` ♦ •.r � �� w yi.it■ii iiiY rupi■ ■ •rui iYtuuuvj�� - Y(. % /�� A J l_'I 1Il■"I��r7S ■�1 I ___--• _____�y'�Z� li - � "°��� ���� v'/�%•'��1����—�Y��==�4��■ I ■ri!!■Irlu ilt..ra! `��l Ay■"' `� ^I`��/`��,nrniiiYnlii��if��Yit_Eo,�l� � I��'ll��@R"��r:� � �I - •( -����•�I�j�*�II � ` r��� 11'll/ - I ii`i l�n�G. iir�f�.�� - �J� �/i��•�, �:��t ' � �.nnlr iir!■ fir, '`-`"-`"� �I�y!`� 1 ♦ -. ■ri 1,110A1 i�♦iti OZ. !agl ow _ .Clt- ��L�JI r�, �I��� ��J�1II 1`■■Ir.�riiii Yiii y���y ffrr�.■■���Y+��w�'■■W.■�■I� MjeEll r !■n ll�ri+iiF■�ui.o �I ffi IT 07; a MONISM" ■i III I! ������ .e?I r I ■ ��� `t� •yam'" ��_ `� I v y - o®gip � o®mv urr.00 HIM T. L - ■.- .�li RUMWE IL Aill , 1`_-I! IT-�� 7 �1�1 �'�I ��"'�! � r�.�•�1 .I• �F�f71 �r ���� Io 1' Q'=�! a� ■ I fit ♦b ,��/ !!a�� �. i_rr. ��� i { � � r /•+x]( �►'' ,Llil ; ,(Ilyl jam' ( `y +Ft _•�` . Jw MW ��,�`�� ICE• ■■ , N�f I ��! \•••r` �l��/ , ■.' �2�31 , is It� •'y/ •' � - ,A�\'��� ri�...:'o•�• , "�1/ Imo, [ r-- ,t.� !�. �/fir��i�•1i��\P� r v ®�6' - , J r1 _ 656Z-60-19Z!Xel 006t-690-M D--yd Pi oss Nw'.,4.1-1,'ool Ims',o�nj.dv av& A-LIJ3dO'dd OW-la DIVI EEPSGNj A.I,.j vot-Ims-'Pb ou;.Ill"g V I.<, bspo:)053WOH N39VH SNVHNOI133S SSO'd:) 0 h if / �i dpS K a ——————————— OUR SUN��� LOT STANDARDS: MINST'ND RDOLOTT WIDTH CORNER LOT=65' MINIMUM LOT SIZE 6,000 SF A Single Family development by HANS HAGEN HOMES r tµ\Ao l )V73 u31 S 16 SURMOf/NTAB . `'"R 0 y a 3 31 f a r � r F r -•r— oo •r2`d'�a `R�r i fz Sg TO ROHT� � �5 FO S/0£K'A�k OF 5.0 i d0,6 72 5±::a jf�. GqR rf p 0 Sg r N73�3 G 5.0' +S js 6�0:r f o )O, 0 I r r o ,/youS L) � q 0. it � y,STA r'w�,A e —A w zo c0ucrf r7, lslAe oND£) W o HopoS£o 4.0.. /GRA CgRgGe / 0 AtLA r VSE PATrp n (StAe ON C?A0F) j c pHOpOS r� OVS fE0 ,ory !� l-"87` SF / �i PA (SLAB ON T� ;�ryc f2o � ryO ADf) r ! q.p_� ` r �' 400 t), 6C j rno � .& l Jh�vO A", 2Q`T24i �Ql "r OF,,CATt-��dTf l myer i 6,25f; Sr O4:02 Q 0 4 Vj Lyy PTy 5 N7,o 000T r f d J:Sp„w r MINIMUM SETBACKS: /sf)00 FRONT YARD HOME: 18' FRONT YARD GARAGE DOOR. 20' N�3°3I, FRONT YARD MIN. BET'AEEN SIDEWALK & GAR DOOR. 24' S()"Lv FRONT YARD SIDE STREET CORNER LOT: 20' REAR YARD: 20' SIDE YARD: 4' DISTANCE BETWEEN HOMES: 8' Sale 1"= 20' a Denotes Iron Monument I Bearing Datum: Assumed Job No. 13400 Drw B DWO I hereby certify that this plan, survey or report was prepared by me 7. or under my direct supervision and that I am a duly Licensed Land ouo SONS,InSurveyor under the laws of the State of Minn es o. PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYORS BY G(� 6776 LAKE DRIVE NE,SURE 110 LINO LAKES,MINNESOTA 55014 Doted this 29 h do of July 2013. Minnesota License No. 25341 FAX(51)361.820 1 _� Y FAX egruo 361-8701 www.egruo.com •.i,.�.1 ,'I r,.., 5...,,r li e. ,_.1:A.„,.. J O W W LLJ W � Q T > L W } W W �i. W LL. LL j z n O W N F A M Q U= p 0.. � W - V 661 +� •� v > z � > W W Z) W Z 0 W 0Mc 00000 0202020 0 C z z z z z r u•�...xitnw ' a '' Y Y � � N r— M 1.0 00 r- e— bA bQ bA bA Cep Cab 0�0 Q Q Q. Q. Q Q Q Z W Z O b.0 0 0 � � l U cn {Y W o >•°}-' U m U O cL E O Q Q co U W w co � L E >' a. o E a� cca = n.C4 o °� c cn cn v C7 N a; � -B -6 cu o °o o Q � � ci� �" U2 Q y •Q y .TL SG a C'3.D chi�L u � .n�• �.ap -' 91 v E `ro u U• cotn � •E a � y c ro •ia .i •- E c 2 P�.a s r.c v v�� ou t �$ c id L O L V n.0 — N O.•O C O ZOX o 'n 2 .q F es•i� C ti G p .�..L .0 F - > V 0 . LU O v A r bC a cc E Fs n-, 3r. c o �.� um -••33 � .� u � w �'o m e'73 — �.� c s •c n c a oo� v c �' ��.n•_ �.�� M1 i c S a c rn c 3 P oCL > Y u n•c x °° Sr c w::, •'� v t o c Fi C,_:o c ms� '-•a � a 'tea ;�� �� Eu': 45 5 va v u mvu v4: �G� a y _ C e e; >, Rt E � - 3 •a• LL: a ^� J a e G c z •>, •gyp ,�^ci C F c �'y�y• o h ° y z Y s` a °�;. � _^ i'� j�. : '�/ .,tr iIt•tlrt���` 76 rf t' - apt l , t`- r• '� ir -%1_441 LU ? 1k to { i (.LJ f 1 ♦��.' ! f +rT a LLI W dis L LCL W rF'+ fir{ _ 1 �•�{it;+k:S Wes^. �� .. i I+,F ti f' - r' � �+ ` t ;{i\ � �r 1• r 1 q << ter• L �t 9! /�i' r3 F 3 ' ! } ir1 ?v � t:YR •� e y• t �y yy may, r,.'••`h�,t �4(`�4 t—..,�� ti4y 4' ``M' 1 z moo it CL CL r'V,l+�\ — � + . Z t �- .0 o z �a? I,Y + i f .a -'1' '` • -4 + � 1`' " �y�r+ [` 4 I tad •• �1' � .. Ow F 1 �2 ---------------- 411 Z' 1 r yy, 1 - 'j�.. •�,��a .�� i V i� ♦�.`t _ ♦r �r y <a T -- s { ,'a'•t �• it :1 t N'W T fp� tzt4 ` � ��.-..�... •it n t um f �iC �Li� • MINIM 41 �aft _ a at L .aa�a�J� � � P`•; 'a ■ i j . �n v .:� � t.a'1■ M�7Lt zql t3 a 1, '+i te W •mot - I 1. C'tE " 1p y� W � L.CJ y„ •s LU = ; All w !� Y CC AAA—-- F �/•,\ ' O .. 0.62 Cd z f a� A -a.I� U - t LLJ LL.I i I � •! K Y. '{. z Z 7 < I l � ' m t)` L.LJ U < Z X A ` zLLJ N W G 0 0 C - I f _ •f 114 E .. O12 V J � ��• _.. �_ o aa`r v q � c4 a W " T o 3a IE � cc °n 3 V 71 -{r o LIMV.G n 2 ~ �06 Z N f 3 �}° m / ,= a„ ZZ P = e " Z 7 =- ��- aCL q m N a V O - y.' :��Y. •ti ice-.L Lu C < P - N•d O X m N uj � 3 w o . _ ° gbE N R W w 4 W/ E g _i y.La o m w ti re Z .e LU •� _ y w 51. IT t S s fe — F < C C a Um Z? jr0 J •'! J Qp '��' Yr'U m��x m��x Z fU I�-y2 CWJ� W'Z"JO ( ? tJdY "'�Z Zy VZa 2 W U a —< NZa =OWz =O-Z Z> S � zo< vZWi72m"u-' W�xmLL O mm8 boo <J?u�< 3 <Eju, W OWN �<F• oza c�6Z<� j a�<z LLJ z � Z �,I• i 1 �.� _� q N X }1J « � r l v. y G O po LLI 8 0 5 ' a c W96 O z_ m9 G z 5, D. o Ahk 'I+ C cC A i' •y, t O 2 J < is u 5' Z ` N s� z Z a W � J U 4i%FLz �c TF`c C C ,w Z zS Ji iy _i g 06 """ Eye ' j' = UM ZN > �Z M �u 9 LLJ E O LW LLJ LU Q ~N us Q �^ � C l LLB e E ¢ � III ! SF= C=.3 f'� � e:S�f�v` _ um °S r LW LU I, Li �Rli E Wob :9 i gyJ y CL c > i W w ar4 t rl L ,• i a+. f . . 1'••7-MMMOWAN JJJIII l Y.aw: LW61!Ll�ly�lf , F. Al Q W Ai .r J t 1 y1. a 6 y r LW `fX t � t W 1j IA LW r� ; 1 ll t W � � -- M�■1 6 1 S: > � � t s 411 W _ spa"✓�y.�'i.'� � :f� ��. { �y� �)}- e r. Agnes Z 3 - - Of ce W - �illl 7 { n C ! W ._ _! W rt�1�u Ko _ at >:0 iv any : W }` Y� E 1 W '�! Z � - Q — WF is .o — i "i ;7; W i `'9 • - W `•:� •.tee.,: It — W - / � sm _ �2�4 ff�= . �r�� �•��R J)• 1 � �fFF( 'F • •� s sv t Jf%• __ J � X 6c Z 11� Q c K G u N C L c> � p'y Z I T •'� G• .. E�.E� F4u �= c ''-�' n"^ o�=� � c�_ °cpt�'� � u 2•EY= d-c E '� cKi c a u E = S c A •� ^''�'> w•z u�c L E. C ~?^ Q m• Al O O U 7 :s Ro.ti u £ U C n'p -'y U Ldl j�L•n ry G O E {< �Ji p L d' >. O C G .'` N N N N•aY..-. M p. 3 v+ c•� a.c x�"a.�' E^ vcC ^iC C j w G V G: L ."�' 4) d j•y •4 9 1.O n D ¢,` J r. 2 .0 ¢- U t ` '� 0. m y O P L v V A._•G w C U�" 6 � G� C �'`q � •F.;C s � aft "y.l: �e«Y. = v. �.'3 � _ �� G G F• L O t1 C JJ{ L G 7 0 a G '� C.E 'S i j .Y.. LaN..C p Q.'c = E EN K O C aa+ L �z �•E- 3 •G=� 0 4 '«C)t O .' `° 9 ,_, 3 m �,.F � Y m Y V= O F^.7 T _ ,:-7 ; C F u �• ; = a Y W w .Y F U �• N'O rsJ ^ ac p' c D= u ,.�^J- n •G O r _G E K-o L G c R SJ 3 - .�• T.n N L?`O ao U J C 'J x TJ^ � t.y V � s.r = mac- «'� c •z x c-� ,-� E �rJ -- A>, i �'x.5'u' Iry G� a-' r e A z 2 3 ' ��, 7 V� y�"•�C � 1) q 3 rs ? y ci 'E.a G �1 a-y E ' v a f�.•_ � � =6� n N E' ¢cra c G, x L� a1 � N fl -� fl h Q .4 y i� E t`•1 � � ti � � aJ V :i 2 E v O A e1 4 O c �y "' G)y n G O u•�'•c E g E•a '� V u u ^ ; o ,�. o w u ^- y ,, r c - 4 E fO ,.f ='-cV �.� M ��.=) ? e � eu� o� tei ` ' e c ��� �°a y•� u 1 3 '= ,Gc.E.ca IL-Vs .=. FW`c = `-�' ? 'mo - a.°c�',C � 43�'��r� � - - '�^.•05'oc D` 00 a L V C C E = 9 p I O• N E r Q O 4• R� n N o �C a p CL LO O v L y' to VI-11 e'J 'GJ 50 �=•.4c. ax ^ °''c� )� � ... p.c p � a d ; .. - vi a •` E G r= b�'•o - tu'.uy d E�a _r ' L E= u °i�•s�J " ' = •^1 d G E V N q ? W O N R 7 'j��U G a. 'c o O T U W R C•O E p N X CI 'G' C Y C L 4 i Ct :.i 2,.i � r •� a o � v y c n Q ,,,�a, R� n � y >,=p U � u �-� - r.E 4.Z 7_. rt n Y+= .p u j .� u v; - `r` a 45 F } � Y z Ju•SE •a'dca `� Er-'3 a '�v �a a"^ " o u E o 3 Ep U= a c. - •V C x �` .- p U c �� C• V L... a b i E 4A ' •C € •3 � i u � a c e y y �_ •L'� � o C _�� � '� Q •E v ` E .c "g u c ,,5 r z 3 ,• y .c •c - _� -r r N _ � _ c v w s _ ..� v '1 i 5 .;�� �? c a m � •a o a m N y c� �� �'a G Ca .. i.0 CZ Ti c, y •�,C a t d C_� .r N _q= 3.� - ,�' - C. �:` d t, _ L C _tc 'C c e �' L R 0. r C't .'^-• U _ 6 S R V y ti gg C'•_ L' U C a:eti C U V �' S� J p[ ',: � y V .� •�'-'� ice•. C�Y �r � V N C S C.. a� � � �' '` ,7, i � it> .� u ' c m .� •b m c c c s o > a�-, Sc'�U c � c, e a `' ? e V •$ o £ c 4 ?� ,y, t b 5 Lam' a c-•' c't y £ a :�t c 4 � ��•C r L F•- y .. O. CJ i� T•� `. V .� i :. � V •.� S.'.�: Q t� ..- u �a y n .. O it N a `� J W 3' o i�i "0 pN p •}' ' C C , C a y ' « aV.. 44 S y^ r V p v .c � = 4� � = �•is L 1 �S � y 3 O'C- �` C u:° .�{� � C v >. S•` C ti y x j''y c ti•� ` X o._e e 1'� = c •.� y .V E O` tYtt�'�•.`C y S t y.4 p L V� � y J 1C 1 C O � y-�•,�, L'� +��? S•` �%V CO � � N•' � V N t(4 zH 3 'et, c m 3 u x k =.} 'c°C•V 'C "'b C _ O �"" - ci y '3CC L'O "'!t - .0 c. j•_ "] 0 4p S y = ' F e 6 n. C n 3 a) a U_ V ::'h` u r y1.g ?•1 a 's C, .�i f� Cy p G ,6 4 S n R z N_. v A y cC, b ? c - "C( :� a c^,'. .o t ` . r,`-, w p o C lz x ,. •.j L � •A �= +1 "V Q 0. � e° O� C � C %C N�C �• :C� - V � tCi ti G•% � 9.- q y C: yy.,.i- C R `�� [ O ^ A S V �ti i .^ ;� C a+v .. u.F, u a N ni =•� C Al C +1 cy, u r`+ ca, O, o u o:- u A, < o =L cn �O Q CI CG C : $ t% \ 02 #/ 9 - \ \ ( ! \% \ ft7 \ \ \ƒ\ \ \ } �& 7 � g= Z W Z Z O v GzW go H WdU � V Z L V Z" ��� OP W V a< • aOd7 o�e<� Y V z M 0�� Z Z O of m r 4 g¢�aoe a V z z z N F Or— V � W N� .. h um Z =Z V O WZ a o s wo ce C a O ce 0 Z V Q Z � 0 Q V Z O V F y Z y � W W W � O � W O Z O m H /ua cd _cd O• Z Z �Z f g O� V- FOCUSENGINEERING, inc. MEMORANDUM Cara Geheren,P.E. 651.300.4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264 Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267 Date: August 13, 2014 Chad Isakson,P.E. 651.300.4283 To: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Re: Inwood—PUD Concept Plan Review Cc: Nick Johnson, City Planner From: Jack Griffin, P.E., City Engineer An engineering review has been completed for the Hans Hagen Homes Inwood PUD Concept Plan. A PUD Concept Plan was received on August 12, 2014. The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by E.G. Rud &Sons, Inc.: • Inwood PUD Concept Plan dated August 11, 2014. • Graphic Illustration, not dated. We have the following review comments: MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY • Municipal water service is readily available for the Inwood development proposal. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal water to the development site at developer's cost and to extend future connection stubs to all adjacent properties as directed by the City. • The Comprehensive Water System Plan, dated April 2009 requires the placement of Water Tower No. 4 within the area planned as Inwood PUD. The specific site for Water Tower No. 4 must be addressed as part of this development proposal, either reserving the appropriate property dedicated for the Water Tower or the City must verify that an alternative site has been acquired prior to excluding the Water Tower from this development plan. • Multiple watermain connection points and stubs must be incorporated as part of the development. At least two connections will be required along the south edge of the development; either two connections to the Eagle Point Business Park water system or one connection to Eagle Point Business Park and one connection to Boulder Ponds at 5th Street. • A trunk watermain stub shall be installed to the northeast corner of the development for potential future extension along 10th Street. • The City will be constructing trunk watermain along Inwood Avenue in 2015, from 10th Street to Eagle Point Blvd. This main could be incorporated interior to this development if the development application has progressed sufficiently to accommodate the Inwood Trunk Watermain project schedule. The design of the Inwood Trunk Watermain Improvements is already complete. Project bidding for the final alignment will occur no later than January 2015. • Watermain stubs to adjacent property and pipe oversizing will continue to be reviewed by City staff as the development progresses forward and oversizing routes may need to be changed as part of the final construction plans, in particular to oversize pipe to and from the Water Tower site. Watermain oversizing is paid by the City as a reimbursement addressed within the development agreement. PAGE 1 of 4 MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER • Municipal sanitary sewer service is readily available for the Inwood development proposal. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal sanitary sewer to the development site at developers cost. • The applicant must provide a total estimated number of residential equivalent units to be located within the plat so that staff may review the downstream sewer capacity limits. The Inwood development may need to connect at multiple sewer service locations to divide the flow to separate downstream sewer mains.The City is in the process of evaluating the downstream sewer capacity limitations. • Sanitary sewer pipe stubs to adjacent property and pipe oversizing will continue to be reviewed by City staff as the development progresses forward. Revisions may need to be incorporated as part of the final construction plans.Sewer main oversizing is paid by the City as a reimbursement addressed within the development agreement. • No lift station has been planned for this area. It appears that the area can be served without a lift station. STORMWATER MANAGEMENT • The site plan is dependent upon and subject to a storm water management plan meeting State, SWWD and City rules and regulations. Storm water facilities proposed as part of the site plan to meet SWWD Permitting requirements must be constructed in accordance with the City Engineering Design Standards Manual available on the City website. • The general drainage system should mimic the natural topography of the site in order to ensure a drainage system that provides positive storm water drainage across the development. Overland emergency overflows or outlets will need to be incorporated as part of the site plan. • The ultimate discharge rate and location will be an important consideration to avoid negative impacts to downstream properties. The storm water management plan will need to address changes to the downstream drainage system to the extent alterations are proposed. To the extent adjacent properties are impacted, written permission from those properties must be submitted as part of the development applications. • Per City requirements, all storm water facilities, including infiltration basins, must be placed in Outlots deeded to the City for maintenance purposes. The Stormwater Facility Outlots must fully incorporate the 100-year HWL and maintenance access roads. It is unclear from the concept plan submitted if all the proposed ponding and infiltration is on Outlots that will be dedicated to the City. • The storm sewer system shall be designed to maintain the City standard minimum pipe cover of 3.5 feet. Drain tile is required as part of the City standard street section at all localized low points in the street. Drain tile considerations may impact the storm sewer design and depth requirements at low points. • Per City requirements all storm sewer pipe easements must be a minimum 30-feet in width. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS • Access along Inwood Avenue and loth Street must be reviewed and approved by Washington County.This approval should be pursued prior to preliminary plat submittal to avoid significant rework. It appears that the proposed access is consistent with Washington County guidelines with the exception of the additional access proposed south of 51h Street. This access should ne eliminated. • Improvements required by Washington County at the intersections along Inwood Avenue and loth Street should be the responsibility of the applicant and should be incorporated as part of the preliminary plat submittal documents. 5TH STREET NORTH: 5th Street North seeks to become the backbone of future development along the 194 corridor, essentially becoming the primary access in and out of the future neighborhoods. The street is required for the sole purpose to support the growth and development within the corridor. The quality of the street and its connections are critically important. The purpose of the proposed street standards are to 1) PAGE 2 of 4 improve the function and appearance of the street, 2) encourage pedestrian and bicycle use, and 3) reduce the potential for speeding. • The plan indicates a minimum 100 foot R/W as required. • The proposed 2-lane collector parkway street (5th Street) design and geometrics must meet all Municipal State Aid design standards for urban streets (8820.9936) for ADT > 10,000; 40 mph design speed; and must be consistent with the detailed parkway cross section installed throughout the remaining corridor segments and as outlined in the 5th Street Collector Design Guidelines as prepared by City staff. • The proposed alignment appears to be consistent with this design intent. However, the proposed plan indicates additional impacts to the adjacent Bremer Financial Services property as noted on the Concept Plan.The proposed alignment requires permission and R/W acquisition from Bremer Financial Services. • Access spacing to 5th Street is allowed at 1/8 mile intervals for non-continuous local streets, at % mile intervals for continuous local streets and collector streets, and at %2 mile intervals for streets with higher classification. ➢ The intersection with Street B/D (a minor collector) is currently shown at 575 feet from the westerly commercial driveway access.This intersection should be moved approximately 85 feet to the east. ➢ Street D accesses 5th Street as a RI/RO only with a commercial property access located just 300 feet to the east. Street D should be realigned to meet the full access guidelines of 660 feet to avoid cut through traffic through the commercial property. ➢ The private RI/RO driveway along the south of 5th Street should be moved further east to maintain a minimum 330 feet from Inwood Avenue. • Right and left turn lanes must be incorporated along 5th Street North per the City design standards to maintain mobility along the Parkway since there is only one travel lane in each direction. • Additional streetscape amenities are required along 5th Street consistent with the remaining corridor segments and the preliminary design that was provided to the City by Damon Farber. 5th Street Amenities include a north side off-road bituminous trail, minimum 10 foot width with 5 foot clear zone; a south side concrete sidewalk, minimum 6 foot width with 2 foot clear zone; landscaping elements including a center landscape median; and theming elements including street and ornamental lighting, banner poles at primary gateway intersections,and white post& rail fencing. RESIDENTIAL STREETS • Turn lanes must be added on all interior development streets at the intersections with 101h Street, Inwood Avenue,and 5th Street. • Street C is a proposed cul-de-sac extending over 1100 feet in length with an additional street cul-de-sac extension of another 560 feet.This exceeds the maximum allowable cul-de-sac length.This street must be revised to connect interior to the development. • 9th Street and Neighborhood Street E should align to create a full intersection rather than offset intersections along a minor collector road. As proposed, the intersections do not meet the minimum 330 foot access spacing for a minor neighborhood collector road. • Staff has preliminarily reviewed the unique street layout for the "Neighborhood" street segments proposed in this concept plan and believes the general concept is a workable design. However, there are several design details that must be addressed as the development progresses through the process. Some revisions should be expected. • All R/W widths, pavement widths and turning radii need to be further detailed to allow staff to review the proposed street geometrics. The turning radii shown in Neighborhood C and A do not appear to meet acceptable standards. • The R/W Boulevard along the "Neighborhood" street segments appears insufficient including a proposed reduced house setback. It is unclear where the private utilities will be installed. • Ten (10)foot utility easements are required on either side of all right-of-ways. PAGE 3 of 4 • Six (6)foot sidewalks must be provided along all continuous residential streets and along other streets as may be required for connectivity. Sidewalk and Trail locations should be jointly addressed with the applicant since the proposed sidewalk layouts vary from the City standard requirements. • All streets must be designed to meet the City's Engineering Design Standards including R/W width, street width and cul-de-sac radii. Surmountable concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in single family residential areas and B618 curb in commercial and multi-family areas. All street intersections must be at 90 degrees and maintain 100 feet of tangent with maximum slopes of 2% for first 100 feet. Residential maximum longitudinal grade is 8%with no sidewalks,6%where there are sidewalks. • For any street and R/W design variance from the City Standard residential street section, additional detail must be submitted for staff review and consideration. This review should be completed prior to preliminary plat submission to avoid significant rework. COMMERCIAL AND MULTI-FAMILY AREA STREETS/DRIVEWAYS • Turn lanes must be added on all interior development streets at the intersections with loth Street, Inwood Avenue, and 51h Street. • The commercial and multi-family area access roads and driveways require more detail to facilitate staff review including all R/W widths, pavement widths and turning radii. Additional clarification is requested to delineate public street R/W from proposed commercial or multi-family private driveway access. If private streets are proposed, staff should review to determine where private streets will and will not be allowed. PAGE 4 of 4 Station #1 Station #2 3510 Laverne Ave.No. 4259 Jamaca Ave.No . Lake Elmo, MN 55042r• Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 651-770-5006 651-779-8882 LAKE ELMO FIRE DEPARTMENT August 19, 2014 INWOOD PUD CONCEPT PLAN I have no immediate concerns with this proposed project. However moving forward, we will need to address the following: • Proper naming of streets and address numbering to follow City standards. • Proper road width to allow access of fire apparatus. This shall include addressing the multiple"islands" shown on concept drawings. • Proper placement and adequate number of fire hydrants in both the residential and commercial areas. • Fire Sprinklers as required per code. • Any additional Fire Safety items as we move through the process. Greg Malmquist,Fire Chief "Proudly Serving Neighbors & Friends" Wva shin ton Public Works Department g Donald J.Theisen,P.E.5.�=5-Count Director y Wayne H.Sandberg,P.E. Deputy Director/County Engineer August 20, 2014 Kyle Klatt Community Development Director City of Lake Elmo 3600 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 RE:Washington County comments on the concept plan for Inwood Creek PUD concept plan, City of Lake Elmo Dear Kyle: Thank you for submitting the Inwood Creek PUD concept plan located southeast of the CSAH 10/CSAH 13 intersection in Section 33, Township 29, Range 21 in the City of Lake Elmo. From the project narrative, the proposed site is planned to have a mix of residential and commercial/office land uses. The residential uses proposed are 272 single family homes, 12 townhome units, 176 rental townhome units, 120 senior housing units in one building and two, 75 unit apartment buildings. The commercial uses include 6,000 square feet of office, a 12,000 square foot pharmacy, a 2,000 square foot coffee/food shop, a 3,000 square foot gas station, a 5,000 square foot daycare, two 12,500 square foot retail buildings and a 20,000 square foot office showroom. In total, the proposal includes 730 residential units and 73,000 square feet of commercial/office uses. Based on initial review of the site plan and the proposed uses, the following access points and general intersection layouts should be provided: • The proposed CSAH 13/5th Street intersection should be designed as a full access intersection with an exclusive southbound left turn lane, a northbound right turn lane, a westbound left turn lane and a westbound right turn lane. Traffic Signals may be necessary at this location in the future, so the intersection should be designed to accommodate a future signal. • The proposed site access at CSAH 13/9th Street be designed with a 3/ intersection with vehicles exiting only able to make right turns. • The proposed first access on CSAH 10/101h Street past CSAH 13 should be designed for right in - right out only. • The Eastern Site Access on CSAH 10/10rh Street should be designed as a full access intersection with a westbound left turn lane, an eastbound right turn lane, a northbound left turn lane and a northbound right turn lane. The intersection should be designed to accommodate a possible future traffic signal. Other comments and recommendations include the following: • The right-of-way requirements for both CSAH 10/101h Street and CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue is 184 feet(92 feet from the centerline of the roadway. The formal PUD application for this development should include the necessary right-of-way dedication. 11660 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 651-430-4300 - Fax: 651-430-4350 • TTY: 651-430-6246 www.co.washington.mmus Equal Employment Opportunity/Affirmative Action Inwood Creek PUD Concept Plan 2 Page • The Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2030, Planned Trail System, does not identify a trail corridor along CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue but does identify a Planned County Trail along CSAH 10/100'Street. Even though CSAH 13 is not identified as a trail,there is currently a trail along the west side of CSAH 13 extending from Woodbury to Oakdale. It is important to consider the development of trails on both sides of this CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue since it is an"A" Minor Arterial Roadway in an urban area.We recommend that the city require trails along CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue and CSAH 10/10th Street as part of this development. The city is also encouraged to develop their local trails in the area to connect with the county and regional trail system. . • The access spacing on the 5t"Street from CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue to the new local Street D may be too close. 5th Street will be an important local, collector roadway that will provide local connections for all the future residents and employees along this corridor. Other factors include Washington County's access spacing guidelines, future traffic volumes on 51h Street and CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue, future land uses on this property and properties to the east, and the intersection of CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue may be a candidate for future signalization.This close access spacing may cause traffic to back into the intersection and constrain the ability to construct necessary turn lanes. Also queues from any future traffic signal may sometimes extend into the intersection of 51h Street and Street D. It is recommended that the Street D at 5`h Street be realigned to the east. Right and left turn lanes on 5`h Street should also be incorporated into the plan. • The proposed access drive from 5rh Street to the Pharmacy/Gas station does not meet County access spacing gquidelines. This should be eliminated and access provided at the new intersection of 51 Street with Street D. • No direct access to CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue is allowed from the Pharmacy/Gas Station site and the median break on CSAH 13 should be removed. • Similar to the 5`h Street/Street D roadway spacing from CSAH 13/1nwood Avenue, the access spacing of the Street B extension from CSAH 10/10 Street to Street A is too close. This is based on factors including Washington County's access spacing guidelines, future traffic volumes on CSAH 10110 Street, future residential land uses on this property and properties to the south,the intersection of CSAH 110/1 dh Street and Street B may be a candidate for future signalization. This close access spacing may cause traffic to back into the intersection and constrain the ability to construct necessary turn lanes. Also, queues from any future traffic signal may sometimes extend into the intersection of Street B with Street A. The access spacing of Street A to CSAH 10/10th Street should be a minimum of 300 feet. • The developer or the city must submit the drainage report and calculations to our office for review of any downstream impacts to the county drainage system.Along with the drainage calculations, we will request written conclusions that the volume and rate of stormwater run-off into the county right-of way will not increase as part of the project. • Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency(MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCA's Noise Area Classification(NAC)where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a Inwood Creek PUD Concept Plan 311' �ikit, exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. County policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The developer should assess the noise situation and take any action outside of County right of way deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. • All roadway improvements and any grading within County right-of-way will require a Washington County Right of Way Permit. • A Washington County Access permit will be required for all new access points on CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue and CSAH 10/101'Street. • All utility connections for the development require Washington County Right of Way permits. Typically, these are the responsibility of the utility companies. • Washington County, as a part of the Gateway Corridor Commission, is preparing a Draft Environmental Statement(DEIS)for a proposed transitway through the 1-94"Gateway Corridor" from St Paul to the take Elmo/Woodbury area. One of the potential stops would be in the general vicinity of this project area near CSAH 13/Inwood Avenue. The transit alternative may have impacts to adjacent roadways which will be dependent on a number of factors that have yet to be determined. The distance of this site from the station location chosen, the location of bicycle and pedestrian connections and the presence of transit supportive uses within the area may compliment this development. Thank you for the opportunity to comment on this PUD concept plan. If you have any questions, please contact me at 651-430-4362 or ann.pung-terwedoCaD-co.washington.mn.us. For permit applications, please contact Carol Hanson at Carol.hansonaco.washington.mn.us. Regards, rr r Ann Pung-Terwedo Senior Planner C: Carol Hanson, Office Specialist R/Plat Reviews/City of lake Elmo/Inwood PUD Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Ecological and Water Resources Division Central Region Headquarters 1200 Warner Road, Saint Paul MN 55106 Telephone: (651) 259-5845 MNDNR Fax: (651) 772-7977 August 25. 2014 Nick Johnson City Planner City,of Lake Elmo 3900 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Re: Comments on Inwood PUD Concept Plan Dear Nick, The MNDNR has three comments regarding the Inwood PUD Concept Plan: I. The City of Elmo's shoreland ordinance does not comply with the State's shoreland rules that limit the level of impervious surface to 25 percent (MR 6120.3300 Subp. 11). The MNDNR has not approved the City's recent shoreland ordinance (adopted June 1], 2014). We have several concerns with the current ordinance, including that the impervious surface limit of 30 percent. and how the language regarding water- oriented accessory structures and the 150-foot riparian dedication requirement in the ordinance are being applied by the City. 2. Integrate greater natural vegetative cover in the open space area to achieve the intent of the open space design criteria of the PUD provisions (MR 6120.3800 Subp 6. B.). 3. Retain and enhance the existing vegetative buffer along, the stream to maintain natural drainage hydrology. DNR has the authority to approve PUDs until a local government has adopted shoreland ordinance provisons consistent with the state shoreland rules (MR6120.3800 Subp 1). We would prefer to not have this approval authority and would instead encourage the city to adopt shoreland rules that comply with the statewide shoreland rules. We would like to meet at your earliest convenience to discuss the concerns we have with the shoreland ordinance and to continue the process ofordinance approval by MNDNR. Sincerely. �C) S�VaJA-Q-" Molly Sho een Area Hydrologist mndnr.gov An Equal Opportunity Employer DNR Information:651-296-6157 1-808-646-6367 651-296-5484 1-80"57-3929 Community Development Department 1584 Hadley Avenue North *A!Okalid.a- le Oakdale,MN 55128 August 29, 2014 Nick M.Johnson City Planner City of Lake Elmo,MN 3 800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Ann Pung-Terwedo Senior Planner Washington County 11660 Mycron Road North Stillwater, MN 55082-9573 RE: Inwood PUD General Concept Plan Dear Mr. Johnson and Ms. Pung-Terwedo: Thank you for providing the Inwood PUD general concept plan for the City of Oakdale's review. We have not had sufficient time to review the plan,however we would like to share our initial reaction to the concept plan. We do not support the restricted accesses proposed along Inwood Avenue at both Oak Marsh Drive and 9"' Street North. However, we look forward to discussing this proposal on September 12 at our access management meeting. Sincerely, C / EmilyLely City Planner City of Oakdale (651)73 0-2720 emily@ci.oakdale.mn.us Kyle Matt From: Dean Zuleger Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 12:19 PM To: Kyle Klatt Subject FW. Lake Elmo-Hans Hagen Homes Please read into the record of the Planning Commission tonight per the Mayor of Oakdale's request. From: Bob Streetar Sent: Monday, September 08, 2014 12:19 PM To: Dean Zuleger Cc: Carmen Sarrack; Stan Karwoski; Paul Reinke; Lori Pulkrabek; Kent Dotas; ted.bearth@co.washington.mn.us Subject: Lake Elmo-Hans Hagen Homes To Honorable Lake Elmo Mayor and City Council,and Planning Commission Members: I am writing on behalf of the Mayor and City Council of Oakdale to convey our very serious concern with the potential reduced access to 9tn Street north,and Oak Marsh Drive that is being considered as a result of the Han Hagen Home development.At this time we do not agree with reducing access at either location. However, we are very willing to work with your staff and the County staff towards a mutually agreeable solution. Please include this email in the official Planning Commission meeting record on September 8 and the City Council meeting record on September 16.Thank you for your consideration. Bob Streetar Community Development Director City of Oakdale 651-730-2806(o) 612-834-3056(c) Bob.streetar(a ci.oakdale.mn.us 1 Nick Johnson From: Tom FitzGerald <tfitzgerald@carbonair.com> Sent: Monday, August 25, 2014 6:24 PM To: Nick Johnson Subject: Fwd: Hans Hagen Homes proposed PUD on 157 acres of land on the SE Corner of Inwood and loth Street Attachments: image001 jpg Please see below Thanks Tom Fitzgerald Sent from my Wad Begin forwarded message: From:Tom FitzGerald <tfitzgerald@carbonair.com<mailto:tfitzgerald@carbonair.com>> Date:August 25, 2014 at 5:07:59 PM CDT To: "'kklatt@lakeelmo.org<mai Ito:kklatt@la keel mo.org>"'<kklatt@lakeelmo.org <mailto:kklatt@lakeelmo.org>> Subject: Hans Hagen Homes proposed PUD on 157 acres of land on the SE Corner of Inwood and 10th Street Mr Klatt, I am going to try to make the planning commission meeting this evening but may not be able to attend. I am a resident of Stone Gate. I live at 877 Jasmine Ave Place North, Lake Elmo, MN 55042. 1 am opposed to this planned development based on the density being requested,the types of dwellings proposed (town homes and apartments) and the requested reduced set backs. I think we all realize that this land will be developed and we have accepted that. However, I don't feel that we should accept any developments that are more dense than the density specified in the memorandum of understanding with the Met Council. The homes in Stone Gate are mid to upper level homes with large lots and a development of any kind adjacent to it with lower valued properties will negatively effect the property values in Stone Gate. A development with apartments,which I assume will be rentals, will have a particularly negative effect on our homes'values. I also don't feel a development of this type is consistent with Lake Elmo's traditional rural feel. 1 Those of us that live in Stone Gate have accepted that the bulk of the new development required by the Met Council was going to happen on land directly adjacent to our development. We are in effect bearing the burden of all this new development for all the residents of the city. I do not think that it is unreasonable to ensure that these developments are no more dense than they have to be and that the planning commission only approve those developments that will not negatively effect the values of already existing homes in Stone Gate. I hope to see you at the meeting this evening. If I can't make it, I wanted you to know my thoughts. Thanks Thomas M. FitzGerald President and CEO Carbonair Environmental Systems, Inc. 1480 County Road C West Roseville, MN 55113 (651)202-2953 Direct (612)599-3752 Mobile tfitzgerald@carbonair.com<mailto:tfitzgerald@carbonair.com> z Lj �- f September 8, 2014 To the Lake Elmo Planning Commission and City Council: As the most personally impacted residents of Lake Elmo,we strongly oppose the Hans Hagen development proposed for 157 acres West of our homes for the following reasons: 1) The Metropolitan Council dropped the number of expected residents of Lake Elmo from 24,000 by 2030 to 20,500 by 2040; a 14.5%decline,which should result in a 14.5%decline in the amount of housing units. 2) The residents of Stonegate do not want any more housing allowed in our city than is mandated by the Metropolitan Council. 3) The Future Land Use Map submitted with our last Comprehensive Plan update showed 464 REC Units for the residential portion of the 157 acres.The Hans Hagen proposal reflects 695 REC Units for the residential portion, an increase of 50%.With the elimination of the Memorandum of Understanding, there is no reason to increase the density of housing South of 10'h Street from the Future Land Use Map. 4) The Future Land Use Map was put in place less than 2 years ago.This is a recent document that had many hours of resident, staff,elected official and developer input.There is no reason to increase numbers from the Plan, rather the numbers should decrease by at least 14.5%due to the decreased residential forecast. 5) The Future Land Use Plan called for medium and high density development to be located South of 5lh Street in order to keep excess traffic off of 101h Street.This road is already extremely busy, and creates safety hazards today for Stonegate residents exiting the neighborhood. .We respectfully ask that the Planning Commission recommend denial,and the City Council confirm denial of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan as it is inconsistent with the intent of the Lake Elmo Comprehens n aind Future Land Use Map for this area. Signed,The following residents of Stonegate: �) Name' Am �0 . Signature' Address:_/") Jmr 4Aj be Al i 1 &—ZL-1m Name: �4^y4 p�-f< Signature: Address: :S 1 Name:l // (� �� � Signature: �� Address:�� JGISk4fl1�Pl/� Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 CI Name: Y Signature: Address: J tiS Men Name: 6—cl t, Signatu J. Address: U I V �j Name: / L .,-Signature: Address: IL, X60 c Name: ��O c ..p trure: s � Address: Name: -10 J'-A( Signature: Address: �VQ . N . o �� /,'i'✓y SS2r 2� C Name: A L�,, Signature: Address: Name: )4f—a— Signature: Address: ,33 J v It Lake— Elm n k//Q 5504- - Name: D Signature: Address: �--IJ le Ave. , ,4 )" YVIA. S .� ( Z Name: gcx �1�� Signature: Address: S, �(7— Name: • Signature: Address: A41h y Name: 1 �S'tc�e�l� Gl� Signature: Address: C Ale— , " M� re-5 5 : September 8, 2014 To the Lake Elmo Planning Commission and City Council: As the most personally impacted residents of Lake Elmo,we strongly oppose the Hans Hagen development proposed for 157 acres West of our homes for the following reasons: 1) The Metropolitan Council dropped the number of expected residents of Lake Elmo from 24,000 by 2030 to 20,500 by 2040; a 14.5%decline, which should result in a 14.5%decline in the amount of housing units. 2) The residents of Stonegate do not want any more housing allowed in our city than is mandated by the Metropolitan Council. 3) The Future Land Use Map submitted with our last Comprehensive Plan update showed 464 REC Units for the residential portion of the 157 acres.The Hans Hagen proposal reflects 695 REC Units for the residential portion, an increase of 50%.With the elimination of the Memorandum of Understanding, there is no reason to increase the density of housing South of 10'h Street from the Future Land Use Map. 4) The Future Land Use Map was put in place less than 2 years ago.This is a recent document that had many hours of resident,staff,elected official and developer input.There is no reason to increase numbers from the Plan, rather the numbers should decrease by at least 14.5%due to the decreased residential forecast. 5) The Future Land Use Plan called for medium and high density development to be located South of 51h Street in order to keep excess traffic off of 10'h Street.This road is already extremely busy, and creates safety hazards today for Stonegate residents exiting the neighborhood. We respectfully ask that the Planning Commission recommend denial,and the City Council confirm denial of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan as it is inconsistent with the intent of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for this area. Signed,The following residents of Stonegate: n 'Name: tM � E �121 Signature: �LAki �jiL Address: AL,�e Name:—M a r, ridl Signature: (Lau Address: l /V �Il' 1I)T *f, N.� l[—� lei /���� M�l' �J✓�K� Name: �,� Signature': t ' Address: �1� 1 and ll i'� "t, r J - "L"�- ' l ' /" Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Name:�o , �' 1 __J 1'� /� , Signature: Address: �"( ��lil�I l l j I- IL .' l yt ` , 1, U/ ' 6' 0 ! V) �VC9- Name: A�,1 Signature: , Address: 57-S/G),F' // A- /a vv Name: Jckrl C .P_�I_`L Signature: �-Q�� �e�_��t ., Address: � C� C L , Name: 1 1 c✓ �t G� Signatur • - \ Address:s0 1/ O v Name: ��J/��j� `� W.4Z4 (� Signature: _ lLir�✓ ���r< y/ Address: R Name:��I^(��ll i' Signature: Address: �S�lo Shl��d'�' �IV�L 0C,I<({. � 5 'a1Xg Name: V 1c.1tn �it�4J -Signature: V. Address: .. 2` N ��` l�� ��.�w� VA K 1 Name: f 22; L'/1 r' ,��/-1-, Signature: Address: Name: � Ce_Q_ Signature: Address: L f:::�� Name: o f� �, Signature: M), ps k - _v f Address: 20 Name: ���5 -NUCR" Signature: Address: Sze JyL &V *IT LA/ 1_6 rho, �1 Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Zq Name: l�/wn �� l�=1-11 C��� Signature: 1 LIzI - Address: m D ai Name: �� C Signature: VO Address: /L— i 3 Name: G. (� �( Signature: Address: .3`2 Q } ��' �/ Z-A�z �✓►tc 1����- 2'- Name: ; `�o f Signature: A Address: 39 / S d- N . (Lek F/fm M Name: U-1-u o V m - * Signature: Address: 3 to �' 1 3� Name: (' .7r LA N l t I � SlA'�' Signature: /b� Address: d`� 3 S kA Lr,�ke (- mo (�1�1 SD1(L. -35 Name: t: z" //6 /)1 Gtti Signature: /4—-"/ Address: 'S /�' ' h �? Lc� �= , a /y Name: 1 - I 1 L 1�� 1 � P� ( � 1 Y Sit �� Address: �` C52-�� � T�� L<�.�C� ` j.iyQ 1--( 2 37 Name: G �'l l Signatur Address: ( � �� ok<pr ,'rl 14--Pe-Nl Gt c- L--i1,r:�e Name: Signature: Address: 2 4L, v — S a: ^' Name: ( LUe6fl\ f� jL Signature: Address: 9 �I i/ Gl O> S1 �/ C G }� C`- � '1/ SS-D 42 Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Lf 0 Name: Kc v-� S �'� �S Signature: Address: 6 3 �t� S� /�/I Lrx ke— L—:( Vnb IName: rw L{ �`( rJ G I��.t Signature: Address: d % 9 (. 4 /z� t' 1,41A d L14 Iy 111 U Li 2- Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Name: `,l/Tt IC— f P-XA,C Signature: Address: (n T /Lj 13 Name: A.2DECE Signature:--4 i Address: L S77 '11 T — �� _ Name: Signature: Address: E 1 Name: %�� �� ���7��Signature: Address: Name: 1/ �-f V— �e Signature: �� Address: +� Name: rar C,�. Signature; Address: 1 ll� Name: Trm i 1"6 oil Signature. Address: T76 —x[L"?�T��� cUL �-.Gl (}V1lL � ,S�j�� Z Name: �? U t 1L f Ci7. y Signature: Address: K 1 rn a iA t,4 2 G�d Name: C�.� �� ►i�.i�56 •z Signature: Address: I � i I Name:( Signature:'�� ~ Address: (0�� �11i w�7`/4 y z C:e Name: V ^'! �C ` Signature: Address: 2 Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 > Name:U 6P�� Signature: Address: V:{ Ltd CI Al LLk- 5yName: Signature: I Address: J- 'n ) 5J Name: (�t�f �r� Signature( Address: �� �.ke /�l�✓ Name: _ //��y /'��'T�C'. Signature: Address: 1� rj Name: r� Signature: , ^ PM2L,M Address: >°,, YV 5Y Name: ��1-'�/-n� Signature: alt�e Address: wti ate- P I-r,.- Name- %c�l0 2 '1 ''signature: Address: 6 s-S- -T-e� e A,,:�, YY\A-1 e: I�c � /-� f e'S��'t Signature: 1r �'�. r L�� C �-� Nam Address: C( SS J L� t_ /�-U ��f i_A AJ Name:.,—�&U-C4 Signature: ! Address: Iv1 Name: �� �c d - Signature: Address: 3 Name: <� T Signature: -�/ Address: (�i/1/4.t �G ✓� 1 �7/t` S J/��" Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Name: \,►)o R %"lY AST Signature: Address: v i Name: / f Signature: Address: 2—��ll Name: T YYi'!� skti p Signature: Address: J� !I/ L 4,�� ��L��O /✓�!� Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: September 8,2014 To the Lake Elmo Planning Commission and City Council: As the most personally impacted residents of Lake Elmo,we strongly oppose the Hans Hagen development proposed for 157 acres West of our homes for the following reasons: 1) The Metropolitan Council dropped the number of expected residents of Lake Elmo from 24,000 by 2030 to 20,500 by 2040; a 14.5%decline,which should result in a 14.5% decline in the amount of housing units. 2) The residents of Stonegate do not want any more housing allowed in our city than is mandated by the Metropolitan Council. 3) The Future Land Use Map submitted with our last Comprehensive Plan update showed 464 REC Units for the residential portion of the 157 acres.The Hans Hagen proposal reflects 695 REC Units for the residential portion,an increase of 50%.With the elimination of the Memorandum of Understanding,there is no reason to increase the density of housing South of 10`h Street from the Future Land Use Map. 4) The Future Land Use Map was put in place less than 2 years ago.This is a recent document that had many hours of resident,staff,elected official and developer input.There is no reason to increase numbers from the Plan, rather the numbers should decrease by at least 14.5%due to the decreased residential forecast. 5) The Future Lard Usa Plan called for r•ieuiUi-n and high c.ersity developroert to i.e located South of 5th Street in order to keep excess traffic off of 10th Street.This road is already extremely busy, and creates safety hazards today for Stonegate residents exiting the neighborhood. We respectfully ask that the Planning Commission recommend denial,and the City Council confirm denial of the Inwood PUD Concept Plan as it Is inconsistent with the Intent of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for this area. Signed,The following residents of Stonegate: Name: 5 - C Signature: Address: v /V LLc � � l C� J �JC= Name::?::2 t i& n Signature: r � Address: { �I `" l v 111 ry Name: � ( Signa/ture: /nn .1 !( Address: 9Q2� � � I /- . (� �� 0 , !'�'l /) Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 Name: Signature: n Address: -71 Name: Yv1 Q-/Atl Signature: Address: li �✓ i✓j ti Ol� Name: J a-� Zfgatn,. Signature: Address: Gr h { G Ih v, Z �j Name: Signature: (/G� Address: cosi n Name: L A� & Lat50r� Signature: r f- Address: 'E AS rrm; 191/V Z"-14 g3 Name: S�t� r Se ✓` Signature: Name: '��L�(1�G1., �D \1e Signature: L Address:���SQ 1 V�L 1��2 Q )Y'AQ M N 55DyZ e:Name. 1'�U11 Signatur G-� 75 Address: O-I r-�) la cs m i KL J IYY\c) N y-Z i q(p Name: �d'�'ir j � re,4 c 1 Signature�- j Address: tti1'E AVE FL—okil, LA- te 6;Lw,-a qe7 Name: C Signature: Address: k�in,- LAP Name: C/�A Signature: Address: ? ?i11 0/h( 'Opf // /" 0 NA, Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 1311 Name: �� Cyr 1 Signature: Address: ggl J� 1 O Name: 1LGu�-v er a cl Signature: Address: 77 a, l �'lA IName: TR)� Signature: r Address: O HL �.� Name: _ Signature: Address: D L ' � Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature- Address:- Name: Signature: Address: Signature Page for Stonegate Petition dated 9/8/2014 ,?q Name: 1J� CJ Cyr 1 Signature; f T rM pfaceAddress:_ �gI cC101 SVti(_( 1 Y �, 1/v Name: y k-zG er a k Signature: ) Address: 7 7Asrvee A .xf- f l /vb. &4c l tgiA) I Name: �'(�{n t� � 1 Signature: Address: Q L+ �•Z Name: IfZU\LSignature: f f(Lu--f ck Address: 0 (p' c) Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: Name: Signature: Address: THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: September 16, 2014 REGULAR ITEM# 17 AGENDA ITEM: Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan SUBMITTED BY: Nick M. Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director Jack Griffin, City Engineer Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief South Washington Watershed District Stephen Mastey, Landscape Consultant SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item.....................................Community Development Director - Report/Presentation..............................Community Development Director - Questions from Council to Staff............................................. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...............................................................Mayor& City Council - Discussion.......................................................................Mayor& City Council - Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates POLICY RECCOMENDER: The Planning Commission and Staff are recommending that the City Council approve a request by Boulder Ponds OP3, LLC for a Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) Plan for a planned residential development with 98 single family lots. The proposed residential development is part of a broader PUD on approximately 58 acres of land that includes outlots planned for a 64-unit senior living multi- family building and commercial uses. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD — The City will require that the applicant enter into a developer's agreement with the City to specify the financial responsibilities for various aspects of the subdivision and related public improvements. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: Boulder Ponds OP3, LLC has submitted an application for a Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for a proposed 98-unit single family residential subdivision in Stage I of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. The proposed planned --page I -- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 171 September 16,2014 development includes outlots planned for a future 64-unit multi-family residential building and commercial uses. The proposed Boulder Ponds development is located on 58.3 acres of land immediately east of Eagle Point Business Park,immediately north of Hudson Boulevard North and immediately south of the Stonegate residential estates residential subdivision. Approval of the request would allow the applicant to proceed with preparation of a final plat and final PUD plan. The Planning Commission and Staff and are recommending that the City Council approve the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan with 12 conditions of approval through the following motion: "Move to adopt Resolution No. 2014-73, approving the Boulder Ponds Preliminmy Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan subject to 12 conditions of approval" BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached is the original detailed Staff Report that was provided to the Planning Commission on 7/28/14 regarding the applicant's request for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for 98 single family lots in the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. The Staff Report includes general information about the application,a summary of the relevant planning and zoning issues, a thorough review of the proposed plat and public improvements,draft findings, and the staff recommendation to the Planning Commission. It should be noted that the City approved the Boulder Ponds General Concept Plan in December of 2013 (Resolution 2013-109). Approval of the concept plan allows the applicant to prepare a preliminary PUD plan and preliminary plat. Finally,it should be noted that the Boulder Pounds Preliminary Plat would have been presented to the City Council at an earlier date(early August),but the applicant requested additional time to address some of the discussion items that arose at the Planning Commission meeting. To address these discussion items,which are identified in the Planning Commission Report section, the applicant has submitted updated materials(Attachment#4)to respond to the Planning Commission's questions/requests. More specifically,the updated materials address the following discussion items: • Flag Lots. Flag lots were eliminated by making some adjustments to the Preliminary Plat. The PUD will still include lots that do not meet the width requirement of the LDR district,but this type of dimensional flexibility is permitted under the City's PUD Ordinance. The modifications to the Preliminary Plat give staff more confidence that the narrower lots will work from a utility and access standpoint. • Lot Areas.The modifications to the plat also allowed for all of the lots to meet the area requirement(8,000 sq. ft.)with the exception of 2 lots. With the previous plat, 8 lots did not meet the minimum threshold. • Community Gathering Space. In response to the Planning Commission's desire for increased community gathering space in the development, the applicants have submitted exhibits showing plans for community gathering locations, Outlot H most notable among them. --page 2-- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 17] September 16,2014 h • Trail Connection.The applicants have added a sidewalk connection to the 5 tStreet Trail from the western cul-de-sac in the single family area. This will provide greater connectivity to the neighborhood. • Theming.The applicants have noted that they intend to incorporate elements of the City's Branding and Theming Study into the signage/monuments for the Boulder Ponds development. From Staff s perspective, the updated plans and Preliminary Plat(Attachment#4)provided by the applicants demonstrates responsiveness to the Planning Commission discussion items. The modifications and additions address many of the concerns that were discussed, and should make the site function better with regards to access and utilities. In reviewing the broader application for the Boulder Ponds residential planned development, staff focused their review on the proposed design elements that are unique to the proposed subdivision and relate to the applicant's request to follow the planned unit development(PUD) process as opposed to the standards subdivision process. In requesting a PUD, the applicants are requesting flexibility in some areas with regard to minimum lot and building standards as determined by the City's urban residential zoning districts. For example,the applicants are proposing that 2 of the 98 total lots be allowed under the City's minimum size threshold(8,000 square feet) for urban low density residential(LDR). In addition,they are requesting a reduced side-yard structure setback of 5 feet to allow for Rick Harrison's coving design principal. Coving is a design technique utilizing curvilinear patterns in streets, setbacks and building pad orientation in order to provide greater visual interest and variation between residential homes. In reviewing the PUD, staff has identified all of the areas that require minor flexibility for the Boulder Ponds planned development to proceed as proposed. In addition,the Planning Commission also identified the inclusion of reduced lot widths during their, sometimes resulting in what is known as flag lots,particularly located in the cul-de-sac in the eastern portion. However,the widths of the proposed"flag lots"have been increased to address the concern over public and private utilities. It is important to note that by applying for a planned unit development,the applicant is presenting a plan that includes requested flexibility in the identified areas. By approving the Preliminary PUD Plan,the City would be granting approval of the requested flexibilities. As part of the Boulder Ponds residential development, the applicants are proposing two product types: traditional single family homes and"Villas". Villas are detached residential product, typically one-story ramblers with walkout, lookout or full basements that are marketed towards the empty-nester demographic. As opposed to the traditional single family homes,the Villa properties would be maintained by the Home Owners Association(HOA). PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission reviewed the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan request at its July 28, 2014 meeting and conducted a public hearing at this time. Before the public hearing was opened, several members of the Boulder Ponds OP3 development team made presentations and answered questions. The members of the Boulder Ponds team included Deb Ridgeway of the Excelsior Group, Steve Sletner of SEH and Rick Harrison of Rick Harrison Site --page 3 -- i City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 17] September 16,2014 Design. The team provided additional background information regarding the intent and function of the coving design. After the applicants spoke and answered questions, the public hearing was opened. During the public hearing, the City received the following testimony: • Curt Montieth, 331 Julep Ave.N.,noted that he lives adjacent to the proposed Boulder Ponds development. He asked what park facilities could be incorporated into Stonegate Park as part of the adjacent land proposed for parkland dedication. In addition,he noted that he will likely contact the Park Commission to get involved in any future changes or additions to Stonegate Park. Mr. Montieth also suggested adding additional plantings north of the proposed buffer greenbelt trail,noting that the Stonegate residents would appreciate it. He stated that he supported the design of the proposed subdivision. In addition to the public testimony received, the City did receive two letters regarding the Boulder Ponds development: • Lampert Lumber submitted a letter(Attachment#14a)to inquire about the proposed grades of the 5tb Street minor collector road adjacent to their property. The Planning Commission asked the City Engineer how the City could address their concern regarding access to 5th Street. The City Engineer noted that due to access spacing guidelines,it would be difficult to access the Lampert Lumber site from 5th Street. In addition,the site slopes downward in that area, and it would be difficult to set 5th Street in a way that was perfectly at grade at the Lampert site. • John Jaros, 429 Julep Ave. N., submitted a letter(Attachment#14b)requesting that the eastern segment of the northern greenbelt buffer trail be moved to the south. The applicants noted that it is difficult to move the entirety of the trail south due to a retaining wall and infiltration basin. However, they noted that it would be possible to move the trail segment further to the south in the northeast corner. The Planning Commission added a condition of approval that they move the trail south to the best extent possible. The Planning Commission then closed the public hearing. In discussing the proposed Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan, the Planning Commission identified some concerns or issues needing clarification. These issues included the following: • Theming: The Planning Commission noted that the proposed subdivision did not include any design elements from the Theming Study completed by Damon Farber and Associates. It should be noted that developers are not required to incorporate theming elements into their projects. Nevertheless, some members of the Planning Commission noted that the theming elements would be a nice addition. • Reduced Side-Yard Setbacks: The Planning Commission noted some reservation regarding the request to allow reduced side-yard setbacks. The applicants responded to note that the not all homes would be reduced to the minimum 5 feet. In addition, due to the coving design that turns building pads,there are many instances where one corner of the home is setback 5 feet to the property line, and the other corner is setback 15 to 20 feet. In other words,utilizing the reduced setback allows for the increased dimension of openness in other areas of the subdivision. --page 4 -- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 17] September 16,2014 • Flag Lots: The Planning Commission noted that the instances of flag lots are concerning. Staff noted that flag lots are typically discouraged due to the difficulty of providing sewer and water service in between tight spaces for driveway access. Staff requested that the applicant submit additional detail regarding the flag lots to ensure they function properly. In response to this request,the applicant amended the Preliminary Plat to eliminate the occurrence of flag lots,providing greater confidence that narrower lots will work from a sewer,water and private utility standpoint in addition to the required driveways. • Ensuring that the Development is Constructed as Proposed: Many members of the Planning Commission expressed support for many design elements of the proposed subdivision. However, there was some concern that if the builder of the project was not informed as to the proper location for each home,many of the benefits of the Rick Harrison design would could be lost by building homes in not ideal locations. The applicants responded to this point by explaining that they complete a development lot book that shows the proper location for each home on all the lots in the subdivision. In addition,the grading plan is completed in such a way that there are fewer options of where to locate the home. To ensure that the development is constructed as proposed,the Planning Commission recommended that the City be party to the development lot book, and can therefore use it as a reference in approving building permits (Condition#12). • Identified Objectives for PUDs: There was a discussion about the required objectives for planned development per the City's PUD Ordinance. Per §154.801,there are objectives that must be met for the City to consider a planned development. In reviewing the application, staff determined the multiple objectives had been met, warranting consideration. However, there was a discussion whether or not the proposed development met one or more of the identified objectives according to the Planning Commission. After discussion,the majority of the Planning Commission determined that the proposed development includes the promotion of integrated land uses, allowing for a mixture of residential, commercial, and public facilities(Objective B). After discussing the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan,the Planning Commission recommended approval subject to 12 conditions (Vote 5-2). Commissioners Lundgren and Haggard voted against the motion to recommend approval of the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan. STRENGTHS,WEAKNESSES, OPPORTUNITIES,THREATS: Strengths: Approval of the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan will allow for the applicants to proceed to Final Plat and Final PUD Plan. Approval of the Boulder Ponds subdivision will provide for a residential subdivision that incorporates unique design elements, including varied setbacks, meandering sidewalks, no double frontage lots, and other features. In addition, construction of the proposed neighborhood would allow for the construction of the 5t' Street minor collector road, a critical piece of infrastructure needed to serve the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. Also, inclusion of the recommended conditions of approval will better ensure that the subdivision is constructed per the vision of the Boulder Ponds development. Finally, it should be noted that the --page 5-- City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 17] September 16,2014 applicants have obtained their watershed district permit (Attachment #13). Having received conditional approval from the watershed greatly supports staff confidence of the constructability of the plan. f f Weaknesses: The Boulder Ponds development does include alternative designs that are different than the City's typical sections and right-of-way. This may present challenges from a maintenance standpoint. At the same time, the proposed design does provide a subdivision with different design features than some of the other recent subdivisions, offering variety in subdivision design and product type(Villa homes). Opportunities: Approval of the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan allows for the extension of infrastructure needed to serve Stage 1 of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area. In addition to the 5a` Street minor collector road, the applicants are proposing to construct a north-south local road that could distribute traffic to the proposed future commercial areas, as well as any future redevelopment on the Cranky Ape and Lampert Lumber sites. In addition, the northern greenbelt trail will be completed from the proposed Savona single family subdivision to Stonegate Park, adding to the overall network of trails. Threats: Should the lots be sold to builders that are unfamiliar with the Rick Harrison design or vision for Boulder Ponds, it is possible that the homes will not be constructed in the intended locations per the PUD Plan. However, the Planning Commission recommended a condition to alleviate this concern, requiring a development lot book at time of Final PUD Plan. The City would be able to utilize this document to give builders direction on the ideal locations for proposed homes. The applicants noted that the Architectural Control Committee of the HOA will enforce the same standards, but giving the City the opportunity provides greater assurance that the vision for the planned development will be followed. RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the Planning Commission and Staff and are recommending that the City Council approve the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan with 12 conditions of approval through the following motion: "Move to adopt Resolution No. 2014-73, approving the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and C Preliminary PUD Plan subject to 12 conditions of approval" ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution 2014-73 2. Staff Report to the Planning Commission, 7/28/14 3. Location Map --page 6-- t City Council Meeting [Regular Agenda Item 17] September 16,2014 4. Updated Boulder Ponds Materials w/Cover Letter (Includes Updated Preliminary Plat) 5. Updated Lot Summary 6. Application Forms and Project Narrative 7. Site Survey 8. Preliminary Plans (49 sheets) 9. Turning Radius Exhibits 10. City Engineer Review Memorandum, dated 7/24/14 11. Fire Chief Review Memorandum, dated 7/23/14 12. Landscape Consultant Review Memorandum, dated 7/23/14 13. South Washington Watershed District Permit, dated 7/8/14 14. Letters Submitted to the City a. Lampert Lumber, 7/22/14 b. John Jaros, 429 Julep Ave. N., 7/28/14 15. Not Included in Packet—Available Upon Request a. Street Cross Section Details b. Plan Details i E --page 7-- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO.2014-73 A RESOLUTIONAPPROVING THE BOULDER PONDS PRELIMINARY PLAT AND PRELIMWARYPLANNED UNITDEVELOPMENT(PUD)PLAN WHEREAS,the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS,Boulder Ponds OP3, LLC, 11455 Viking Drive, Suite 350, Eden Prairie, MN has submitted an application to the City of Lake Elmo ("City") for a Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan for Boulder Ponds, a copy of which is on file in the City of Lake Elmo Community Development Department; and WHEREAS,the City approved the Boulder Ponds PUD General Concept Plan on December 17, 2013; and WHEREAS,the proposed Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan include 98 single family residential lots within a planned development on three parcels of land (PIDs: 34.029.21.33.0001, 34.029.21.32.0001 and 34.029.21.33.0002) totaling approximately 58 acres in Stage 1 of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held public hearing on July 28, 2014 to consider the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan request; and WHEREAS,the Lake Elmo Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat subject to 12 conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and recommendation concerning the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan as part of a memorandum to the City Council from City Planner Nick Johnson for the September 16,2014 Council Meeting; and WHEREAS,the City Council reviewed the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan at its meeting held on September 16,2014 and made the following findings of fact: 1) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan are consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 2) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan generally comply with the City's LDR-Urban Low Density Residential and MDR—Urban Medium Density Residential zoning districts. 1 Resolution 2014-73 3) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan comply with the City's Subdivision Ordinance. 4) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan comply with the City's Planned Unit Development Regulations. 5) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan comply with the City's Engineering Standards, except where noted in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated 7/24/14. 6) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan comply with other City zoning ordinances, such as landscaping,tree preservation,and erosion and sediment control. 7) That the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan includes the promotion of integrated land uses,allowing for a mixture of residential,commercial, and public facilities. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan subject to the following conditions: Pending Review and Approvals 1) The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 2) The developer shall be required to submit an updated parkland dedication calculation in advance of Final Plat. Upon submission of the calculation,the applicant must work with the City to achieve the required parkland dedication amount per the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the Final Plat for recording. 3) The developer shall follow all the rules and regulations of the Wetland Conservation Act and adhere to the conditions of approval for the South Washington Watershed District Permit. 4) The applicant will work with the Planning Staff to name all streets in the subdivision in a manner acceptable to the City prior to the submission of Final Plat. Modifications to the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans 5) The applicant will work with staff to address the comments in the City Engineer's review memo dated 7/24/14 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer as part of the Final Plat and Final PUD Plan. 2 Resolution 2014-73 I 6) In addition to standard easements required by the Subdivision Ordinance, additional drainage and utility easements must be provided extending 10 feet from meandering sidewalks, as well as all of the portion of private lots between meandering sidewalks and the public right-of- way. 7) The landscape plan shall be updated to locate all boulevard trees in between the public street and sidewalk to not interfere with private utilities. 8) All islands and medians internal to the Boulder Ponds development shall be platted as part of the right-of-way and shall be maintained by the Home Owners Association. The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the Final Plat. 9) The design of the northern buffer trail shall be modified to a width of 8 feet as opposed to the regional trail standard of 10 feet. 10)The eastern segment of the northern buffer trail shall be moved to the south to the greatest extent possible with plantings to screen the trail on the north side. Plat Restrictions 11)Prior to recording the Final Plat for any portion of the area shown in the Preliminary Plat, the Developer shall enter into a Developers Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney that delineates who is responsible for the design, construction,and payment of public improvements. 12)The Final PUD Plan will include a development lot book to clarify proper building placement for use in granting building permits for the development. Passed and duly adopted this 1601 day of September, 2014 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Mike Pearson,Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk 3 Resolution 2014-73 TIlF UITN CN; PLANNING COMMISSION �A K E 1�LN-10 DATE: 7/28/14 AGENDA ITEM: 4A—PUBLIC HEARING ~� CASE#2014-30 ITEM: Boulder Ponds—Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer South Washington Watershed District Greg Malmquist,Fire Chief Stephen Mastey, Landscape Architecture, Inc. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan application from OP3 Boulder Ponds,LLC for a 162-unit planned residential development to be located on 58.3 acres of land within Stage 1 of the City's I-94 Corridor Planning Area. The proposed residential project is located immediately north of Hudson Blvd.N., immediately east of the Eagle Point Business Park and immediately south of the Stonegate residential estates(RE)subdivision. Staff is recommending approval of the request subject to compliance with 11 conditions as noted in this report. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: OP3 Boulder Ponds,LLC(Deb Ridgeway), 11455 Viking Drive, Suite 350, Eden Prairie, MN 55344. Property Owners: Timothy Montgomery, 6211 Upper 5 1"St.N.,Oakdale, MN; Louis J.Damian Revocable Trust()killiam Kuhlmann—Security Bank and Trust Co),2202 111h St. E., Glencoe,MN;DPS—Lake Elmo, LLC(Alan Dale),6007 Culligan Way, Minnetonka,MN; Lennar Corporation(Steve Ach), 16305 36th Ave.N., Suite 600, Plymouth,MN; and Bremer Bank(Kathleen Tucci)8555 Eagle Point Blvd., PO Box 1000,Lake Elmo. Location: Part of Section 34 in Lake Elmo, immediately north of Hudson Boulevard North, immediately east of the Eagle Point Business Park,and immediately south of the Stonegate subdivision. PID Numbers 34.029.21.32.0001,34.029.21.33.0001, and 34.029.21.33.0002. Request: Application for preliminary plat and preliminary planned unit development (PUD)plan approval of a 162-unit residential planned development to be named Boulder Ponds. Existing Land Use and Zoning: Agricultural land. Current Zoning: RT—Rural Development Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR(PUD)- PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM Urban Low Density Residential, MDR(PUD)—Medium Density Residential and C—Commercial. Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North—Stonegate Residential Estates(RE)subdivision;west— Eagle Point Business Park(Bremer Bank, Eagle Point Town Office Condos,High Pointe Medical Campus,vacant land)BP; east—Lennar Savona Urban Low Density Residential(LDR) subdivision; south—vacant land guided for Commercial and Interstate Highway 94. Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential(2.5—3.99 units per acre), Urban Medium Density Residential(4.0—7.49 units per acre) and Commercial History: Boulder Ponds General Concept Plan review by Planning Commission on 12/9/13 and approved by the City Council on 12/17/13. Deadline for Action: Application Complete—6/19/2014 60 Day Deadline—8/17/14 Extension Letter Mailed—No 120 Day Deadline— 10/16/14 Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153—Subdivision Regulations Article 10—Urban Residential Districts(LDR and MDR) Article 16—Planned Unit Development Regulations §150.270 Storm Water,Erosion, and Sediment REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received a request from OP3 Boulder Ponds, LLC for a Preliminary Plat j and Preliminary PUD Plan to subdivide approximately 58 acres of land located within Stage I of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area into 98 detached residential lots. The proposed plat would be located on property primarily owned by the Louis Damiani Revocable Trust(represented by William Kuhlmann)and Timothy Montgomery, and would be located immediately north of Hudson Boulevard, immediately east of Eagle Point Business Park, and immediately south of the Stonegate subdivision. The 78 acre parcel has historically been used for agricultural purposes. The preliminary plat has been developed in response to the City's Comprehensive Plan,which identifies the applicant's property for urban low density residential, urban medium density residential and commercial. The proposed planned development includes 98 detached residential lots, located both north and south of the City's planned 5th Street minor collector road. In addition to the proposed detached residential lots,the plat includes an outlot(Outlot K)planned for a 64-unit senior housing facility or apartment. While approval is not being sought at this time, it is worth noting that the proposed senior housing is consistent with the approved General PUD Concept Plan approved by the City in December of 2013. In terms of access,the preliminary plat and PUD plan shows a north-south connection to Hudson Boulevard in the southern portion of the plat. In addition to the Hudson Blvd. connection,the proposed plat includes a significant portion of the 51h Street minor collector road. As part of the total public improvements of the Boulder Ponds planned development,the 5th Street minor collector road will be constructed from the Savona(Lennar)urban low density subdivision in the east to the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM i 3 approximately 160-acre parcel owned by Azure Properties to the northwest. Along with the connection to Hudson Blvd.,the 5`h Street minor collector road will ultimately serve as the primary access to the Boulder Ponds development. The Boulder Ponds planned development is the City's third proposed subdivision in Stage I of the I- 94 Corridor Planning Area that will receive public sanitary sewer service,which has been made available to the site via the completed Section 34 Public Utility Project. At present,the water for this area is provided by the City of Oakdale. However,the City plans to execute a trunk watermain extension down Inwood Avenue(CSAH 13)in the next year or two to connect existing facilities in the western I-94 Corridor to the City water system.At present,there is enough capacity in the Oakdale system to provide water to a significant portion of Stage 1 of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area until Lake Elmo makes the needed connections to its system. Sewer and water for the Boulder Ponds site is accessible along Hudson Blvd. as a result of the Section 34 Utility Project. The applicants are proposing to extend sewer and water throughout their site from the facilities located in Hudson Boulevard. One of the other major features of the proposed subdivision is a continuation of the northern buffer greenbelt along the northern boundary of the site adjacent to the Stonegate subdivision. The greenbelt is required under the guidance of the City's Comprehensive Plan.As proposed,the greenbelt includes a trail segment from the proposed Savona single family development in the east across the northern boundary of the site to Stonegate Park in the west. In addition to connection to Stonegate Park,the northern buffer trail as proposed also provides connection to the City's planned minor collector road, 51h Street. It should also be noted that a significant portion of the greenbelt buffer area includes a Northern States Power(Xcel Energy)easement for overhead utilities. As currently proposed,the single family or detached residential portion of the Boulder Ponds development will be constructed in two phases. The initial phase of the project includes construction of the access road to Hudson Blvd.,as well as the eastern portion of the P Street minor collector road. In addition,Phase I as proposed includes 47 residential lots, both of the traditional single family and "Villa"type. The second phase of the residential development includes the construction of the remaining residential lots and local roads, as well as the western portion of the 5th Street minor collector road. Finally, it should be noted that the Boulder Ponds development is proceeding through the Planned Unit Development(PUD)process.By proceeding through the PUD process,the City may allow for flexibility in the use of land or the base standards of the zoning code with the intent of achieving higher quality development. The City's PUD process has three phases: 1)General Concept Plan,2) Preliminary Plan, and 3)Final Plan. It should be noted that the City reviewed the Boulder Ponds General Concept Plan(12/9/13 -Planning Commission, 12/17/13—City Council),which was approved by the City Council(Resolution#2013-109). Approval of the General Concept Plan allows the applicant to proceed with preparation of preliminary plans,which the applicant has now submitted. Staff has reviewed the approved General Concept Plan and all the conditions associated with the approval. The most critical conditions, relating to the alignment of the 5th Street minor collector road,have been resolved by the applicant. In addition to the issues related to the alignment of 5th Street,the submitted preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plans have generally addressed the other conditions of approval related to the review of the General Concept Plan.It should also be noted that the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan does contain 5 additional residential lots than the General Concept Plan. The additional lots created in the subdivision directly relate to a change in product type, as the applicants are proposing"Villa"homes, a detached townhome on HOA maintained land. Staff reviewed the proposed increase and units and found it to be consistent with the general intent of the approved General Concept Plan. The minimal number of PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 4 increased lots are being accommodated within the same street and utility network, not leading to significant changes to the proposed public improvements. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES The Boulder Ponds site is guided for urban low density,urban medium density and commercial development in the City's Comprehensive Plan,and the applicant will be required to zone the site to the appropriate zoning designation as part of Final PUD Plan approval. The overall subdivision plan has therefore been prepared in order to generally comply with the district standards for the LDR and MDR zoning districts. However, as part of the request for a planned development,the applicant is permitted to request reductions in lot size, building setbacks, and other requirements of the base zoning district. Therefore, it should be noted that four of the proposed lots(Lots 4, 7, 8 and 10,Block 3,2°d Addition)are slightly under the minimum requirements for lot size. In addition,the applicants are requesting reduced side-yard and front-yard setbacks. These requests were established at the General Concept Plan phase of the PUD process and were supported through the approval of the General Concept Plan. In terms of the general design of the subdivision,the northern and southern portions are split between the City's planned minor collector road, 5th Street. The southern portion is accessed off the north- south access road,called Cobblestone Plaza,connecting to Hudson Blvd. and contains 20 proposed "Villa"units,which is a detached single family product with HOA maintained grounds. In addition, according to the General Concept Plan,the southern portion of the planned development will also include a 64-unit senior living multi-family building to be located on Outlot K at some point in the future. The proposed senior living building is not currently included in the present application.The design of the northern portion of the subdivision primarily follows one through street,Boulder Ponds Parkway,which connects to the planned 5th Street in both the central and northwestern areas of the plat. In addition to the main through street,three cul-de-sacs are proposed off of Boulder Ponds Pkwy. The northern portion of the proposed subdivision is comprised of all single family residential land uses,with 60 traditional single family homes and 18 Villa units. The proposed design of the subdivision does allow for a significant amount of open space, allowing all the residential lots to back up to some form of open space as opposed to additional lots. In addition,the overall design (streets, sidewalks, building pads, etc.)is intended to provide a curvilinear aesthetic and pattern. Along with varied setbacks and meandering sidewalks,the applicant has noted that creating visual interest within the development is a critical component to the overall vision. Sidewalks and trails are planned throughout the subdivision. The proposed plans provide for sidewalks on one side of all streets,which is consistent with the Staff recommendation for sewered single family residential subdivisions. In terms of proposed trails,all are designed to be ten feet in width and constructed of bituminous asphalt,which is consistent with the City standard for a regional trail. In addition to the buffer/greenway trail,the proposed subdivision includes a linking trail segment to the northeastern cul-de-sac, Pebblestone Ridge Cove.Finally,the proposed minor collector road 5th Street includes a regional trail on the north side of the road,which is consistent with the City's typical section. The Boulder Ponds subdivision includes two general types of residential lots: traditional single family and Villa. As proposed, there are 60 traditional single family lots. The average size of the traditional single family lots is 9,735 square feet. In addition, the largest traditional lot(Lot 1, Block 2, l'Addition) is 15,832 sq. ft.,while the smallest proposed traditional lot(Lot 8, Block 3, 1" PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A —ACTION ITEM 5 Addition)is 7,206 sq. ft. in size.Regarding the Villa lots,this lot type is intended to serve a different residential product than the traditional single family lots, allowing for a detached townhome type product. According to the applicant narrative,the Villa lots are intended to serve an empty-nester demographic, and the grounds of the Villa lots would be HOA maintained. As proposed,the Boulder Ponds subdivision includes 38 Villa lots,which are located within Block 1, 1'Addition and Block 1, 2°a Addition. The average size of the Villa lots is 10,116 square feet. The largest Villa lot is 18,906 sq. ft.,while the smallest Villa lot is 7,347 sq. ft. in size. It should be noted that the lot sizes of the traditional single family and Villa homes are comparable in size. The main differences between the lot types are the product type(single family home vs. detached townhome)and maintenance(owner maintained vs. HOA maintained). In order facilitate the review of the proposed lots and lot types,the applicants have submitted an updated lot summary that identifies the lot type(single family vs. Villa). The updated lot summary is found in Attachment#3. The following is a general summary of the subdivision design elements that have proposed as part of the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and plans: Zoning and Site Information: • Existing Zoning: RT—Rural Development Transitional District • Proposed Zoning: LDR,MDR and C • Total Site Area: 58.3 acres • Total Residential Units: 98 • Proposed Density(Net): Northern- 2.69 units/acre,Southern—8.05 units/acre* (*Note: includes future planned 64-unit senior living multi family building) Proposed Lot Dimensional Standards through Planned Unit Development Process: • Lot Area: 9,882 sq. ft. average (7,206 sq. ft. min.) • Front Yard Setback: 20 ft. (25 feet for garage) • Side Yard Setback: 5 ft. • Rear Yard Setback: 25 ft. Proposed Street Standards: • ROW Width—Local 60 ft. (per Subdivision Ordinance) • Street Widths—Local: 28 ft.(per City standard) The standards listed above are all either in compliance with the applicable requirements from the City's zoning and subdivision regulations, or are consistent with requested modifications through the proposed planned unit development(PUD). Based on Staff s review of the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan,the applicant has generally demonstrated compliance with the majority of the applicable codes, and the requested modifications or flexibilities as allowed under the City's PUD Ordinance represent a reasonable request given the various design goals the applicant it trying to achieve. The applicant is requesting some additional flexibility through the PUD process to receive advance approval for an alternate design for certain portions of the development. The proposed alternative designs are detailed in the attached document titled"Boulder Ponds—Alternative Site Plan" (Attachment 48)and detailed on the site plans labeled Exhibit"A,B and C"—Alternative Single Family Detached Townhouses. As specified in these plans,the applicant has asked for flexibility to build houses consistent with the proposed preliminary plat,or to change the housing type for certain PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 6 portions of the development to a single-family detached townhouse-type building, or Villa,on smaller lots. There are three specific portions of the development that are identified for this alternative layout, and in total,the proposed flexibility would add nine additional lots to the plat beyond the base conditions. The addition of these lots would not increase the net density for any portion of the project so that it exceeds the underlying density in the Comprehensive Plan. Because the requested alternative plans would not alter the layout of any proposed streets or significantly alter the grading and utility plans for the site, Staff is recommending that the preliminary PUD plans be structured in a way that allows the applicant to move forward with either option. Please note that should the developer move forward with one of these alternatives,the preliminary plans will need to be updated in their entirety to reflect the updated plans. Under such a scenario,the developer would be able to submit revised preliminary plan simultaneously with a final PUD and final plat. The comments from Staff included in the latter portions of this report address the plat as submitted; any future plans that incorporate the alternative plans would be subject to a complete plan review. As with any new subdivision,the City Code requires that a portion of the plat be set aside for public park use. In this case,the applicant has indicated that the northern outlot area, labeled Park,will be dedicated to the City for this purpose. The City's Subdivision Ordinance requires 10%of the land in urban residential districts to be set aside as parkland,which according to the applicant's calculation would represent 4.09 acres of land. On the submitted narrative for the Boulder Ponds project(Item D),the applicant has noted that 3.85 acres of land within or adjacent to the greenbelt/buffer have been dedicated as park. However,City staff is unclear if this calculation includes the area within the Xcel Energy easement,which would not be eligible to be counted towards the required parkland amount. Related to this requirement,the Subdivision Ordinance states the following: (C) Land acceptability. The city must approve the location and configuration of any park land which is proposed for dedication and shall take into consideration the suitability of the land and for its intended purpose; the future needs of the city for parks,playgrounds, trails, or open space; and the recommendations of the city's Parks Commission. The following properties shall not be accepted for park land dedications: (1) Land dedicated or obtained as easements for streets, sewer, electrical, gas, storm water drainage and retention areas, or other similar utilities and improvements; Given that a significant portion(approximately 75 feet x 1300 feet)of the land proposed to be dedicated is subject to a Xcel Energy overhead utility easement,the portion of the parkland within the easement would not be eligible for parkland dedication credit. In addition to the eligibility the land provided, it should also be noted that the applicant has removed the area of the 51h Street right-of-way and the area of the required northern greenbelt buffer from the land calculation for parkland. While staff agrees that the right-of-way for the 5`h St.minor collector road should not be included in this calculation,the northern greenbelt is considered part of the gross area being subdivided for development. For this reason,the greenbelt area,2.83 acres according to the applicant's narrative,should be included in the gross land calculation in determining the amount of required parkland dedication. Inclusion of the greenbelt area in the total land calculation for parkland dedication would be consistent with other subdivisions(Savona and Hammes Estates)that have incorporated portions of the greenbelt buffer around the Stonegate subdivision. In order to address the issues related to the correct level of parkland dedication, Staff would recommend that as a condition of approval(Condition#2)the applicant submit an updated parkland dedication calculation in advance of Final Plat. Upon review of the updated calculation, if any gap PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 7 exists between the eligible land dedication provided and the required land dedication amount,the applicant will be required to submit a fee in lieu of land dedication to satisfy the total land dedication requirement(10%)per the Subdivision Ordinance. It should also be noted that in the submitted narrative,the applicant has requested that the City consider some parkland credit for the construction of park related improvements that do not receive credit for land dedication. Staff would support that some credit be considered,as a significant stretch of trail is proposed over land that is not eligible for parkland dedication credit due to the overhead utility easement. Staff will continue to work with the applicant on how to properly achieve the required parkland dedication amount,whether it be through land, improvements, or fees in lieu of land dedication. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS City Staff has reviewed the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan. In general, the proposed plat will meet all applicable City requirements for conditional approval, and any deficiencies or additional modifications that are needed are noted as part of the review record. In addition,the City has received a detailed list of comments from the City Engineer,the Fire Chief and the City's Landscape Consultant, Stephen Mastey,all of which are attached for consideration by the Commission. In addition to the general comments that have been provided in the preceding sections of this report, Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider the following review comments as well: • Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and Future Land Use Map for this area. The net densities for the development generally comply with the range allowed for the Urban Low Density and Urban Medium Density land use categories. In addition, other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan that relate to the Boulder Ponds subdivision are as follows: o Density Calculation. The subject property is guided Urban Low Density Residential, Urban Medium Density Residential and Commercial in the Comprehensive Plan. In order to demonstrate compliance with the City's Comprehensive Plan with regards to proposed density,the applicant has submitted two density exhibits in the project narrative. The exhibits demonstrate that the overall number of proposed residential units fall well within the amount of planned growth under the Comprehensive Plan. While the net density calculation of the medium density area, 8.05 units/acre, is technically higher that the allowed range for MDR(4.0-7.49 units/acre),the overall planned growth for the area was greatly reduced by the realignment of the 5' Street minor collector road to the south, increasing the amount of land planned for Urban Low Density Residential. In addition,the density of the proposed project was reviewed along with the General Concept Plan. In reviewing the General Concept Plan,the City found that the proposed subdivision was consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. With the addition of 5 residential lots since the approval of the General Concept Plan,the proposed subdivision remains in conformance with the planned growth as guided by the Comprehensive Plan. o Parks. The City's park plan identifies proposed location for neighborhood parks based on the anticipated population that should be served by each park. The Park Plan does not call for additional parks in the vicinity of the Boulder Ponds subdivision, as it is located immediately adjacent to Stonegate Park.However, as part of the required greenbelt buffer, the land dedicated to the City as parkland will PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM it 8 include areas adjacent to Stonegate Park. This should allow opportunities to integrate trail and other facilities into Stonegate Park. However,any improvements will need to conform to the conditions of the Xcel Energy power line easement. o Water. Water will be provided to this area via existing watermain along Hudson Boulevard. The Boulder Ponds subdivision will be able to be served under the City's current agreement with the City of Oakdale until the Inwood Ave.watermain extension project is completed. Staff anticipate that this project will be completed next year(2015). o Sanitary Sewer. The Boulder Ponds subdivision will be served by sanitary sewer that will connect to trunk gravity sewer in the Hudson Boulevard right-of-way.All of the wastewater will flow to the W.O.N.E.MCES regional wastewater interceptor. o Phasing. The Boulder Ponds subdivision is located within Stage I of the I-94 Corridor Planning Area.The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City's Staging Plan, as the proposed development has access to both public sanitary sewer and water. • Zoning. The applicant has submitted an application for a Planned Unit Development, and has previously received approval of the General Concept Plan for Boulder Ponds. Consistent with the City's PUD Ordinance,preliminary PUD plans have been submitted along with the preliminary plat. The final step in this process is submission of final PUD plans with a final plat. The underlying zoning for the PUD still needs to be established,and staff is recommending that the zoning be addressed at the final plan stage. In this case,the Comprehensive Plan guides the applicant's site for several different land use categories, including low density residential,medium density residential,and commercial. Staff will be recommending that the zoning for the subdivision be established to match the Comprehensive Plan in the following manner: o LDR-All portions of the subdivision north(and east)of 51h Street. o NMR—All lots on Cobblestone Path and Outlots N and K. o C—Outlots J,.M,and L At the time a final development plan is submitted,the official zoning map will be updated to reflect both the underlying zoning as noted above and will include a special designation marking the project area as a Planned Unit Development. • Planned Unit Development. The applicant has applied for a PUD,and therefore is seeking to take advantage of the flexibility allowed with this type of application. The specific aspects of the project that will be permitted through the PUD ordinance include the following: o Exceptions to the City's minimum lot size requirements for LDR zoning to allow certain lots to be platted with less than the minimum of 8,000 square feet of area required in this zoning district. o Exceptions to the City's setback requirements in LDR and MDR zoning districts to establish a minimum front yard setback of 20 feet(25 feet for garage)and side yard setback of 5 feet for all residential lots in the subdivision. o Exceptions to the City's development standards for garages in urban residential zoning districts. The applicant has stated that a small number of the standard residential lots and a larger number of the proposed"Villa"homes will not be able to PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 9 meet the City's 60%requirement concerning the width of garages on these site. Given the unique aspects of the "coving"subdivision design concept, Staff is recommending that the PUD plans be structured to eliminate this requirement in its entirety. o The ability to mix different types of uses as part of a larger development proposal that is connected as one development. The project will include single family detached homes,multi-family units, and commercial buildings,and has been designed to function as one unified development. o The applicant is proposing to meander sidewalks throughout the development both inside and outside of the street right-of-way. The City's right-of-way standards depict sidewalks within a specific portion of the right-of-way. o Certain connecting trails are depicted within 20-foot easements; Staff has been asking that trails be dedicated to the City on Outlots of no less than 30 feet in width. o The proposed roads include several medians and landscape islands that are not otherwise included in the City's street specifications. • Subdivision Requirements. The City's Subdivision Ordinance includes a fairly lengthy list of standards that must be met by all new subdivisions,and include requirements for blocks, lots, easements, erosion and sediment control, drainage systems,monuments, sanitary sewer and water facilities, streets, and other aspects of the plans. Many of these requirements have been addressed as part of the City Engineer's review memo(which is summarized below). After reviewing the proposed plat and PUD plan, Staff has not found any aspect of the plat that conflict with these requirements. • Infrastructure. The developer will be required to construct all streets, sewer,water, stone water ponds,and other infrastructure necessary to serve the development, including all portions of 5th Street that cut through the development.Also, Staff has reviewed the proposed phasing of construction for the public improvements and finds it to be acceptable. • Wetlands. The applicants have prepared a wetland delineation for the site,which identifies an existing wetland on Outlot O. The applicant is proposing to incorporate this wetland as part of the storm water management plan for the site,and will therefore need to comply with all applicable requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act for this work. The South Washington Watershed District is the responsible government unit for determining such compliance issues. • Trails. The developer is proposing to build a series of trails as part of the development, including a 10-foot bituminous trail along the northern portion of the subdivision through the required 100-foot open space buffer and a similar trail within the 5th Street right-of-way. The applicant is seeking park land dedication credit for all of the land within the open space buffer area and other adjacent portions of the site that are used for general open space or storm water facilities. Given the circumstances associated with the northern portion of the site, Staff is not recommending that the City accept all of the land shown as park along the northern boundary of the plat for the following reasons: 1)this portion of the site lies under a 75-foot power line easement and nearly all portions of the trail are located within this easement,2)the area shown as park includes storm water ponding area, and 3)the Subdivision ordinance specifically prohibits using areas under a power line easement and within a storm water pond for park dedication requirements. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 10 Because the trail does serve a public purpose,and because the City has previously allowed the buffer area to be used for park dedication purposes with the construction of a trail, Staff is recommending that the developer received credit for park land dedication as follows: o The equivalent land dedication equal to a 30-foot trail segment under all portions of the power line easement. o Land that is deeded to the City surrounding trails and located outside of the power line easement and storm water facilities. o Land within the 100-foot buffer in the northern portion of the site that is located outside of the power line easement and outside of storm water facilities. As noted earlier in this report,the exact calculations for park land dedications should be completed as part of the final plat submissions(Condition#2). Finally,although the northern greenbelt buffer trail is depicted as a 10-foot trail, Staff is recommending that the design of this trail segment be reduced to eight-feet in width to be consistent with the trail design approved in the adjacent subdivisions to the east(Condition #9). • Meandering Sidewalks. The proposed development plans include a series of sidewalks that meander into and out of the street right-of-way for the subdivision. Because this was a design element that was approved as part of the General Concept Plan review, Staff is recommending that the preliminary plans be approved with this design feature. Please note, however,that the City Engineer is not recommending the construction of any sidewalks outside of the right-of-way,and that additional requirements should be included as part of the City's review in order to address the City Engineer's concerns. Specifically, Staff is recommending that the developer provide a 10-foot drainage and utility easement over all private lots adjacent to sidewalks outside of the public right-of-way, and that any land located between the sidewalk and the street right-of-way be covered under a similar easement as well (Condition#6). • Landscaping and Tree Preservation. The landscape and tree preservation plans have been reviewed by the City's consulting landscape architect, Stephen Mastey. The review memorandum submitted by the Landscape Consultant is found in Attachment#11. In the review memo,Mastey notes that the submitted Landscape Plan(L1-L6)and Tree Inventory and Preservation Plan comply with the City's ordinances related to landscaping and tree preservation/replacement.It should be noted that the Landscape Plan as proposed includes street tree plantings on the outside of the sidewalk,as opposed to in between the street and sidewalk. As this location is typically reserved for private utilities, staff would recommend that the Landscape Plan be revised to locate all boulevard trees in between the street and the sidewalk(Condition#7). The requested modifications pertaining to plant location, as well as the identification of plant species, can be incorporated into the Final Landscape Plan. • Green Belt/Buffer. The Comprehensive Plan identifies an area north of the Boulder Ponds plat as a greenway/buffer space with a minimum width of 100 feet. Throughout the Boulder Ponds subdivision,the provided greenbelt complies with, and in many locations exceeds,the 100-foot greenbelt requirement. Consistent with City planning efforts,the applicant has included a trail improvement within the greenbelt to act as a linear park amenity. In addition, trail connections through this area will provide access to the Savona subdivision and beyond to the east and Stonegate Park in the west. It should also be noted that a large portion of the provided greenbelt is subject to a Northern States Power(Xcel Energy)easement. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 11 • Streets. The proposed street system has been designed to comply with all applicable subdivision requirements and City engineering standards. The general street system of the Boulder Ponds development is designed to have a curvilinear aesthetic. As part of the subdivision,three cul-de-sacs are proposed. All of the proposed cul-de-sacs comply with the maximum length(600 feet)for cul-de-sacs in sewered residential subdivisions per the City's Subdivision Ordinance.In addition, it should be noted that the applicants are proposing tear- drop or enlarged cul-de-sac with inner islands to provide additional visual interest and improved sightlines. In reviewing the design of the proposed cul-de-sacs,the Fire Chief and public works staff have voiced concern over the function and maintenance of the proposed design. However,the applicants have submitted turning radius exhibits(Attachment#7) demonstrating that emergency service vehicles are able to navigate the proposed islands.It should also be noted that the designs of the cul-de-sacs were discussed as part of the approval of the General Concept Plan. At that time,the Planning Commission and City Council supported the design of the proposed cul-de-sacs. Other comments from Staff concerning streets are as follows: o Secondary Access. The proposed development includes a new access to Hudson Boulevard that will be constructed as part of the first project phase,and will include the construction of a portion of 5th Street as well. Because there have been no approvals to date for any additional extensions of 5th Street,there is no set timeline for the creation of a secondary access point to the site. Because 5th Street will be built with adjacent subdivisions, Staff is not recommending any restrictions concerning the timing of project phases within Boulder Ponds. 0 31"Street. The development plans have been prepared to comply with the City's approved design for 5th Street with the exceptions listed in the City Engineer's memorandum. The developer will be responsible to construct this minor collector road as part of the initial development plans, and in accordance with the phasing depicted in the attached plans. The final construction plans will need to include all lighting, landscaping,and other details as required by the City. The Comprehensive Plan calls for the future extension of 5th Street further to the west of the applicant's property;however, in order to make this connection the owner of the property immediately to the west of the site(Bremer Financial Services)will need to give its consent to the proposed layout for 5th Street since it crosses through the extreme northeastern portion of its property in the Eagle Point Business Park. The attached application materials have been signed by Bremer Bank,which satisfactorily addresses this concern. • Street Names. Along with the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan,the applicants have submitted proposed street names that relate to the proposed name of the subdivision, Boulder Ponds. In developing the street names for the newly platted or developing areas of Lake Elmo, Staff has been utilizing the Washington County street naming system. The purpose of utilizing the County system is to provide emergency services and public works personnel knowledge of the general location of a property in cases of emergency or general public projects. While staff is sensitive to the applicant's wish or desire to provide street names that reflect the theme of the proposed development, staff is recommending that the proposed subdivision adhere to the County street naming system to the best extent possible. As a condition of approval(Condition#4), Staff is asking that the applicant continue to work with the City at developing street names for the project,and that these names be included with the final plat submission. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 12 • City Engineer Review. The City Engineer has submitted a detailed list of comments concerning the preliminary plat and plans as part of a memorandum to the City dated July 24, 2014, which includes a separate review of the 5th Street plans conducted by a transportation engineer from TKDA. While the report itself is quite lengthy,many of the comments pertain to relatively minor plan revisions or construction details that should not result in any significant changes to the preliminary plat document. For example, some of the comments concerning grading may impact the ability to build a home with a walkout basement(as opposed to a lookout basement),but would not otherwise alter the lots as proposed. Rather than restating all issues and concerns as identified by the City Engineer, Staff is recommending a condition of approval (Condition#5)that will require the applicant to address all comment from the City Engineer in subsequent plan reviews. • Fire Department Review. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plat and has submitted a review memorandum (Attachment#10)dated 7/23/14. Included in the Fire Chief s comments is concern over the design of the enlarged"teardrop"cul-de-sacs. It should be noted that the applicants have submitted a turning radius exhibit to demonstrate that a ladder truck can effectively navigate the proposed cul-de-sacs. In addition to the concern over the cul-de-sacs, the Fire Chief has noted that the proposed street names for the subdivision do not comply with the Washington County street naming system, which the City has been utilizing for recently approved plats. Staff would recommend that the applicants work with City to determine appropriate street names for the subdivision in advance of Final Plat approval (Condition#4). • Watershed Districts. The project area lies within the South Washington Watershed District (SW)VVD). The Boulder Ponds project has already submitted a watershed district permit, and the permit has been conditionally approved. The conditions related to the watershed district approval include compliance with NPDES permitting requirement and verification of soil conditions rough on-site testing. Staff is recommending that adherence to the SWWD permit requirement be included as a condition of approval(Condition#3). Based on the above Staff report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan with I 1 conditions intended to address the outstanding issues noted above and to further clarify the City's expectations in order for the developer to move forward with a final plat and final PUD plan. The recommended conditions are divided into two categories to better communicate the purpose and intent of the conditions. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions of Approval: Pending Review and Approvals 1) The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 2) The developer shall be required to submit an updated parkland dedication calculation in advance of Final Plat. Upon submission of the calculation,the applicant must work with the City to achieve the required parkland dedication amount per the City's Subdivision Ordinance. The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 13 for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 3) The developer must follow all the rules and regulations of the Wetland Conservation Act,and adhere to the conditions of approval for the South Washington Watershed District Permit. 4) The applicant shall work with the Planning Staff to name all streets in the subdivision in a manner acceptable to the City prior to the submission of final plat. Modifications to the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans 5) The Final Plat and Plans must include the requested modifications outlined in the City Engineer's review memorandum dated 7/24/14. 6) In addition to standard easements require by the Subdivision Ordinance, additional drainage and utility easements must be provided extending 10 feet from meandering sidewalks,as well as all of the portion of private lots between meandering sidewalks and the public right-of- way. 7) The landscape plan shall be updated to locate all boulevards trees in between the public street and sidewalk to not interfere with private utilities. 8) All islands and medians shall be platted as part of the right-of-way and shall be maintained by the Home Owners Association.The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. 9) The design of the northern buffer trail shall be modified to a width of 8 feet as opposed to the regional trail standard of 10 feet. 10)The plan and profile for the eastern limits of 5 h Street shall match the preliminary development plans for the Savona Subdivision or will otherwise be revised in a manner to meet the requirements of the City Engineer. Plat Restrictions 11)Prior to recording the Final Plat for any portion of the area shown in the Preliminary Plat,the Developer shall enter into a Developers Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney that delineates who is responsible for the design, construction,and payment of public improvements. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan: • That the Boulder Ponds PUD General Concept Plan was approved by the City on December 17,2013, and the submitted Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan is consistent with the approved General Concept Plan. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM I 14 • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan are consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan generally comply with the City's LDR-Urban Low Density Residential and MDR—Urban Medium Density Residential zoning districts. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with the City's subdivision ordinance. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with the City's Planned Unit Development Regulations. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with City's Engineering Standards,except where noted in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated 7/24/14. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with other City zoning ordinances, such as landscaping,tree preservation,and erosion and sediment control. • That the Boulder Ponds preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan achieve multiple identified objectives for planned developments within Lake Elmo. RECCOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan with the 11 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Boulder Ponds Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan with the II conditions of approval as drafted by Staff based on the findings of fact listed in the Staff Report." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Location Map 2. Application Forms and Project Narrative 3. Updated Lot Summary 4. Site Survey 5. Preliminary Plat(4 sheets) 6. Preliminary Plans(49 sheets) 7. Turning Radius Exhibits 8. Alternative Site Plans w/Narrative 9. City Engineer Review Memorandum, dated 7/24/14 10. Fire Chief Review Memorandum,dated 7/24/14 11. Landscape Consultant Review Memorandum, dated 7/23/14 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM 15 12. South Washington Watershed District Permit, dated 7/8/14 13. Not Included in Packet—Available Upon Request: a. Street Cross Section Details b. Plan Details ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction........................................................................................Planning Staff - Report by Staff...................................................................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission............................Chair& Commission Members - Open the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Close the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair&Commission Members - Action by the Commission.....................................Chair&Commission Members PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A—ACTION ITEM = e Y mA- •sue 'a _ -- �tL--'� F J IF7. •--err� So rce-Esri. DigitalGlobe.GeoEye:i=cubed. USDA,USGS.AEX.Getmapping, Aerogra•. IGN. IGP.sv/sstopo a,di thelGES�� r�omm ni. Location Map: Boulder Ponds PU© i I!F CITY OE_ n LAKE ELM 1 0 250 500 1,000 Feet Boulder Ponds Site Data Scource: Washington County, MN 1"=500' 12-4-2013 EtxC )" r, S 1 0R .*,The 1:;rrdhiw-Gnmely 14 Nick juhn.on City of Lakc lAllitp 3800 Laverm-Avc. N Lake Elmo, MN li:•, hotlld,:[, Purnis I'rclimillarp 1'I:Ir Dear NKI: ON limilder fortis, LI i; is pleased to suhnut (hc-3Ct'ollIpaIlying nevi-wd plans (preliminary plat, tvnth 'tA Sit I)I,tn ;loci C0111111Llllity sl3ace phIIs)to lie cmIsidcrcd;t( (I It-Sgmvildwr 1611'(:'sly C:ottnc•iI Ilico ilk g, III rvxplilluc tU rlie cxunnu•nts and C011CCr11s Of(Ile Phiniling CmilI lixxioll, wc•offt:r tat:following revisions: 1, Hag Lots• Wv elimin:urcl 111r"fi;Ig lots'• Ihralll,hout [Ile tiCYClohnlerlt by adjus(it�l;div lot width ar the street to invet Ille(:;(y'ti ercgtlirc•tl nlinitllnm Of',30 fCCt. I hiS ad)tlStl1ICll( ;111ows tltilitit•s ra lit: h1•0nll.;llt illto the lo(ontsicic'Of the'dri•'cw:ty. 1. I:t,t arras—We have been able(0 brilih all,lull 2 lots ill cnlytl)li,tnr c I'VIA I to nlinirrltnn lot arc;ts, WC at•c.rt-cltICSTilig flexihlllly firr Lor 17, Block I :inch Lail 8, lilorlc 3,WIIiJI arc Irss thall rile 8,000 stlrl:u•r fiat ntininulm. Comm Lill ity(:;Ithrrinl;!ilmc.c . 1,11 .Platillinl;Commission voiced concern over(]It-.I:rc.k of coillinullity gathering%paq s for (Ili.% lWil hl:orhonci. We tlesil.IjCd:1 few areas(II;It nl:dcc St•nsc:flit, cunuuunfty gatheringspaces, mom importanlly in Outlor 11. This ccaln•ally(mated arc;t ahr)Tl}; (tic parkway will include a ga ebalsheltcr, grillm MId Ncatil:v,, Givt:n div 1Iorili.-so Ith sellaration that is c:rc•:llc:cl wlrh 5"'Strt:er, 1110 sourhwCsr cnl-de•sac will also veim:dtt ;1 sulallc r gr;lle shrlrcr and(-eating, 1'hr nortlu:ttil cill-dc:-sat:will:llsrr conr:tin searing,which c'reatrs;art u3c;d llutt,ition (iclm rl1C: iwighhnrluu,tl to rat- rt-;ional trail sysreim. 4, frail (aullllec'(ion, •'I'ht-addilion of Ile:ronttuunily Spaces allows Iur a rrlorc lltli(l vide walk anti tr:lll systenl,elimirlatilig(lit'drtd Ulld 11MIM;11141 I)rovidiLlr. aillIUCClvity 10 the tel;icyllal t1:1i1. 5. '1'heming- While we fed t'Itc''I'lleminl;and lir;lilding Srudy cortclucred by the C;lly Iunstly rc Ialr a to the LIOWIlrOWII area, Iit)tlldVI'fonds Ila";the;thility to civale irs own ueighborlmod therlllog, Neighborhoml moninumts locarecl a( bath (he%guilt:tucl tiorih oturances (I ludson Blvd and Th Street) will c ruate idenrhy. Addiliorially, the landscapilIg cn:cl-itt:fiu•ni,llilll.;s will lye cc>nsiSCellt Ibrout;luttlt, A honlrownc:rs asstwiaritln will CnsurC that the nc'iglilmi-Imod:w%ilic:rics are maintained, I1n•I KVIII-Jra!:mill, I I(: 1 14!:!r Vilmill IJ;;vv.I'smir: 'q'i(i, I-t11•fi('Lieu'.MN Yi Md 017 :i'.,:i 'i'Im :. FStt:I:.�nYl 1.(:.rn•t; a Ini;!m xi ni,acnI I CxurII We.II)Prcci;ttr (ltc UP119u•out1iry u-) respond m thr cuminvias as piescined by the 111anniul;Commission and Inok G-Imird to a hvoralhlc responsc by dic City Council. If y( a have questions, hluxv t::tll Inc nr 612.353.3307 )1 ctn:iil at&L.,ri�y��w. i u:x rlxic�,r(�c,t ti►. 'I"Irutil. }c,u. Sincercly, hula Ridgeway �1 Asset Manager �r W zn p°Q lk .l Z ° O g 9 - " 5 a P y6l� �Z r� O ID 0. n $ 8 os sa L $ Lg o r a T~ i o�i°`- G � s� sgoo o sW$ e s e ;�f$'s aG NS Nina °� "� aL� �� °� � ?�o1 SEB DAL 0 4 d Q Z W a a Fj� 3333: A I 1 $ yN qyqyK •.---Y -- 11 I [ Y II , ILJ J b I � 1 °'.9, •: 1 I ( Ste: _"tic � ' ly i �n �•� I 1 I ,gym 1 i 2 ..u,cau I 1 - N mee-ma.'e.e-----co_:aawo'u'--=—ay�a-y-- --------- - .I I coo CD Mod I 1 E Y M = Em xu C�' oC'S<tl e L I III IIIII W � Oo ALu0 - jay"" E ju W aC_ °^ _•b° '& Sre° els 8 i .o - •O �fla � �5a c° 6' � age• o Sg � 5 8s =e�aF �>Z��°. Cc bi I NYYa iL es t f Q O Z _ tv / / e —ems. fU +�\ K. I ggg\y\1S z. E! pig ^ p1 11 11 1 y'�',1'��il E-1 j i 14'�i''' i i �`�=k ;0 3�•S c`� p_c E sq YY��°,A.a .� ! 1!'� e ' 9-• .�o W.Vm KoW 00000e �� ii"r• ,L"��itr•••� aQ �',a, tlo..o orie0000 I ra s \ a III}}I 1RII n r+. 7 I y A } __— - r F t / Oe��ao aq i•�bidr� �.,� �rK� n � � �@� It e~__� vh�l i, i// d%'.5�y �r I °�Q,°tis y`% •�'i?uuah°k`dSe.'Ir=?r�_ �'b „ I !. r' ) u[Iw ( , ��,,..r ;71 '• �.--Y11 — I 1 �4pe 51 J 17 M � k q 17 'I nt1 b `� • 'S C Y pp of IIX CA �4'u ✓`j'• , 8 _ ��—- �04'i'_1, ' Ue \\ \\ n„�"s rej // ��1e11 F��\\\\^• `e` + � \• O^ — coITV B/is S e¢� S e \• ^gr \\ �� o R ZhN^. 6_J Imo_'\ `/L__ $111` \\ i' °' •O — r N ` WE w E z d e — '� c ii I I Z Of V I f' \\ Qpt 1 1. Y t / PP\ 1 r.'�+�•.,r" i �S' 9@1\a t 9\\ dd I l �.a \\�` a 1': i t `�\ \ p I i �• \\ a'/?y p3 9 1 M � n,F � F�� \ � IY i `t`�•"•q:A`\t\ y r n I I J ys ♦ i �t �Y t n n nit. f,. I I r `� qt r t \ t , ���\.`ic.�, pI `•so�°�i � E3� __ +� J,st yhr\ �P 1/!!R /:'' ^t i 1 e' .•t 1Ai 1 j',:".$$aa I \ mt ,`/\ `,Sawn I �? I I- .� .°�i e•� <4.+ I8�- ____Y6..-uou fit p\F i r�` ^+ •u I`^ t�\\'� rvt $J i t �' •�k�r:� d�':' � i i ��e / �-�'' •fir^ `\y ^�j \\\, �i ^� �-'': x ,�\.'�'''� t � °h i° t¢$� i _w_i-___9L. `_ '.S �'J "`4.r A ;' ��• i t of le £�!'X it i ^i '�o.° -�� 1�__'n*_``_y, � ga ,\ '�d�=sy ,y`��\.• Fa f � i I I des"a b AY_t F: II p :j° _ • to .. 111111 / Icn .�m�le� .:a.• � r±°9g; -`. � /E` L__-_o.u�___� �.y°° - a G'—'+�—+ — 4 Y I—..— tT —I.I•<CfiJq._I yJI 'E".Z ., e `' _- i - Z e7 epy I r" - c ,Y ,,, ,.r ���."6'ry`\ la +.comas •�^ . 1 �": I I YI s.F` ok��� ._, id r Ir I \\ �� ' '� W. p� \ 4 I.-lo sdd°�'_ `�t•________;\. fJ ���Q�i>�86..� t�k x ' ree om ee=ooeeeoo \I 11 it ' `` ^� ^a4e a 'L.•`ord II7 i= � _rl rvr A. 1 ..^ y �� a r[s. I ' gg All II�.�J, 1S` - •I.1 I I L--_-------- 3dj1 ^t•i i 1J � � �i `,•'rc: r i 2 1 "°�u.�r i wmm�---�. •,+ �j: �g€,> �dl 1 ,..+"y8' ��nrl•,• '� :?; rvr ' - ni ^� �, �� �gs�s'= 6 1 / ('^< iq�'��•e�, � 'J'e � � `1 tl i 4y o n B 5 ---------- 1� a •i kiine it t f' .` �;.�� ;� \ l ^'� �a' a tit b.• „.•><�; ��_"� Irl.l \\------------d° $ �-- e ca C-" Fa! E 426AO r. Z. 0 le a C 'q - Z w 5 d [ S Regional Trail Upland Connection P 10'BiW mv Tra il \� Plantings Adjacent • t_� _.- ---- - ----_- - s•s=-----I Property Improvements it� � . . - _ �� I Conifer Tree Wo 1 _-�` -- --- ^ �11 Canopy Tree - ••�� \,'V� - �i'/~ 'f - = ) Ornamental Tree 10'Bituminous Trail Special Features �' '"� 1 Regional Trail . at Entry:Plantings. - - - - Connection =. j r ' - t Stone Decorative Fencing Stormwater / Management: -y 4'� •' �t i��j��.:��•,- t Pond&Infiltration Stormwater - ,-_ r_>"� =� �/ /ry' /Jw Infiltration Area with { __ .v�'•., I tential Community Mesic Prairie Plantings .- � --� rd �. i Gathering Space r»Y �-�• t-" r '° i � esic Prairie New Collector Street (' ram: � _ �� S{ Plantings with Median Plantings I Ornamental Trees _ Plantings for &Perennial Plantings - " - - - �, Screening - Walkway&Trail - •i �,'� '�i t - Connection Cul-de-Sac Island r" Plantings& 25'Street Light �✓o r I ` 1 landscape Treatment 'Evans'Lamp - � t o! ��} � Neighborhood Ribbon Curb at Both '� '� ,%��- l •V ;_. �; - - Concrete Walkway Sides of Median 4 P- �f � 1�.••� Jai `I Native Shrub 6'Concrete Walkway t `-` - i = - •- i I•I �� •y Plantings j� Landscape Op Boulder Groupings Special Concrete/ - Pavers at Median Ends Cul-de-Sac Island - - -� �, t, i Special F®tures at Entry: Wet Prairie Plantings Plantings& _ - '- Plantings.Stone Signage,& at Edge of Ponds Landscape Treatment --'\ i "I- Decorative Fencing --I Neighborhood Stormwater I Concrete Walkway Management: Pond&Infiltration _ tv 15OalLight t••? - J 'Acorn'n'Lamp Lamp - Landscape Boulder Groupings I AIN Stormwater s- - Upland Prairie�-, - --- - Plantings /yyo' Management: P - Pond Infiltration - __- ih &Mesic Prairie HUDSON13LVD y N _ I-94 100' 200' 300' _ 0 SEPTEMBER 2014 EXCELSIOR BOULDER PONDS +Tbehtri,;,,,'C-,wp SEH an-riltMinn OF LAKE ELM0, MN DESIGN CONCEPT: CENTRAL COMMUNITY GATHERING SPACE Y N OVERALL SITE PLAN O CENTRAL COMMUNITY GATHERING SPACE 15' 30' 45' ^- LOCATION o POTENTIAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS `, •GAZEBO OR PICNIC SHELTER �'�— •PICNIC TABLES —; •GRILLS •BENCH SEATING •WALKWAYS/TRAIL CONNECTIONS •TREES&PLANTINGS EXCELSIOR BOULDER PONDS r'':Lud,;" `: "t S E H volution OF LAKE E L M O, MN DESIGN CONCEPT: NORTHEAST ISLAND COMMUNITY SPACE N 0 15' 30' 45' 0 OVERALL SITE PLAN POTENTIAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS •BENCH SEATING NORTHEAST ISLAND •WALKWAY/TRAIL CONNECTIONS COMMUNITYSPACE LOCATION •TREES&PLANTINGS EXCELSIOR BOULDER PONDS le"''``"`'`'`"' °"'' S EH OF LAKE E L M O, MN DESIGN CONCEPT: SOUTHWEST ISLAND COMMUNITY SPACE \ a` CA `' � ]ter'• 1 _ 41 y IT� t N O OVERALL SITE PLAN 15' 30' 45' - p POTENTIAL PROGRAM ELEMENTS •PERGOLA OR SMALL GAZEBO SOUTHWEST ISLAND s COMMUNITY SPACE •BENCH SEATING 1 _ LOCATION fi . . . •WALKWAY/TRAIL CONNECTIONS ` •TREES&PLANTINGS tj EXCELSIOR BOULDER PONDS SEH !ron OF LAKE ELMO, MN BOULDER PONDS, Lake Elmo Preliminary Plat Lot Summary 9I8l2014 Min Required Meets Underlying Lot Size(SF) Zoning Lot Block Sq.Ft. Acres Use Zoning per Zoning Requirements? 1ST PHASE AREA 1 1 17,447 0.40 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 2 1 11,604 0.27 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 3 1 12,822 0.29 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 4 1 10,190 0.23 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 5 1 11,353 0.26 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 6 1 8,584 0.20 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 7 1 8,587 0.20 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 8 1 8,112 0.19 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 9 1 8,410 0.19 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 10 1 8,400 0.19 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 11 1 10,631 0.24 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 12 1 8,909 0.20 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 13 1 8,180 0.19 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 14 1 9,736 0.22 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 15 1 10,982 0.25 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 16 1 8,042 0.18 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 17 1 7,625 0.18 Villa LDR 8,000 No 18 1 10,443 0.24 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 19 1 9,005 0.21 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 20 1 8,717 0.20 Villa LDR 8,000 Yes 1 2 15,836 0.36 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 2 9,873 0.23 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 3 2 8,620 0.20 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 4 2 8,005 0.18 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 5 2 9,105 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 6 2 11,483 0.26 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 1 3 11,788 0.27 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 3 8,428 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 3 3 8,338 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 4 3 8,078 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 5 3 8,159 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 6 3 9,788 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 7 3 8,004 0.18 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 8 3 7,450 0.17 Single Family LDR 8,000 No 9 3 8,229 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 10 3 8,112 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 11 3 9,100 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 1 4 8,716 0.20 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 4 9,510 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 3 4 9,309 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 4 4 9,199 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 5 4 8,532 0.20 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 6 4 8,480 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 7 4 8,172 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 8 4 10,194 0.23 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 9 4 8,255 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 10 4 8,280 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 1 BOULDER PONDS, Lake Elmo Preliminary Plat Lot Summary 9/8/2014 Min Required Meets Underlying Lot Size(SF) Zoning Lot Block Sq.Ft. Acres Use Zoning per Zoning Re uirements? 2ND PHASE AREA 1 1 9,057 0.21 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 2 1 8,001 0.18 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 3 1 8,012 0.18 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 4 1 9,582 0.22 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 5 1 9,959 0.23 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 6 1 8,783 0.20 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 7 1 8,455 0.19 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 8 1 9,080 0.21 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 9 1 12,793 0.29 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 10 1 21,111 0.48 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 11 1 10,190 0.23 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 12 1 9,331 0.21 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 13 1 8,270 0.19 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 14 1 8,973 0.21 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 15 1 8,644 0.20 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 16 1 10,923 0.25 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 17 1 10,413 0.24 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 18 1 9,677 0.22 Villa MDR 7,000 Yes 1 2 17,402 0.40 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 2 12,514 0.29 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 3 2 9,526 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 4 2 9,327 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 5 2 9,190 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 6 2 9,336 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 7 2 9,636 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 8 2 8,346 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 9 2 8,334 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 10 2 8,399 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 11 2 8,251 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 12 2 8,173 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 1 3 12,072 0.28 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 3 12,282 0.28 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 3 3 10,377 0.24 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 4 3 12,142 0.28 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 5 3 10,547 0.24 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 6 3 11,689 0.27 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 7 3 11,463 0.26 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 8 3 9,598 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 9 3 9,748 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 10 3 8,443 0.19 Single Family LDR 9,000 Yes 11 3 8,019 0.18 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 12 3 8,064 0.19 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 13 3 8,839 0.20 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 14 3 10,171 0.23 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 15 3 9,960 0.23 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 16 3 9,552 0.22 Single Family LDR 8.000 Yes 17 3 10,732 0.25 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 18 3 9,720 0.22 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 19 3 8,964 0.21 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 20 3 10,649 0.24 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 21 3 15,226 0.35 Single Family LDR 8,000 Yes 2 BOULDER PONDS, Lake Elmo Preliminary Plat Lot Summary 9/8/2014 Min Required Meets Underlying Lot Size(SF) Zoning Lot Block Sq.Ft. Acres Use Zoning per Zoning Requirements? Outlot A 152,517 3.50 Comercial Outlot B 107,367 2.46 Senior Housing-64 Units Outlot C 109,350 2.51 Ponding Outlot D 64,584 1.48 Ponding Outlot E 183,233 4.21 Commercial Outlot F 104,051 2.39 Ponding Outlot G 44,646 1.02 Ponding Outlot H 69,606 1.60 Pond&Wetland PARK 168,635 3.87 Park 45.15 TOTAL SITE ACREAGE(net of ROW) Total Total Single Family Lots Villa Lots # 60 38 Acreage 13,40 8.70 DUA 4.5 4.4 Total Units 162 Total Site Acreage 45.15 Units/Acre 3.6 3 EXCELSIOR The Excelsior Group r lunc'?, 7014 Mt..t� Nick Jolut.sctn City of Lake Elmo 38001.tvcrnc Ave N Lake Elam.Al N 55047. Re:Boulder Ponds Prelttnituny PUD and Plat Applica.ions Dear&it-.Johnson! 01"i Brildder Ponds, LLC ispicascd ro submit rbe enclosrd applications for Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PLED. The follm ing irons accompany rhis submirral, 1_ I'rcliminan•Plat Application z. Preliminary 1'UD Plan Applimtion 3. Check in the amoum of'$9,350 4. Drafr of;Luster HOA.document's Evolution Engineering will submit rbc,plan scrs ca su111A:lilt:[it the altitliCatiouti as well av provide a link to an FYP site for electronic version of the plans. Please now rhat the Affirtuation of Sufficient Interest from DPS_I.ake Elton. LLC Wan Dalci is strut inciud.-d with the applications and is expected This week. ennar,as coo-racy purchaser,approves to DI'S's signing Ltf the document per included ernail from Steve Acb. If you havL qucsriotts related to rhis application, please contact ntc at 612.353.330", or Drh.Ric?grtiv::� ff.lvacrlsiorl_I.C.r�:nt:. Thank you. Sincerely, c� I D:b Pjdgcwai Asset klamagCr 1uclosures T' _ L..;:_.. ,n7ut�.�!C: 4 l i=t�r.Ytk�n��1+6•ac. Su;te". F.-,-. r.,.,,:. ;r; :_.. I - _--:i'j+_4 a ezr.ClS�GtLL:.co+�� � In7Cyi�E,,� .•.�-, ._t . :n DateReceNed: THE: CITY OF 65'1-747-3900 Rmejvz.d3y _- LAhE ELMO 3800LmemeAAena�NaA ul rile ,�� talc-Eln;G. MN.,a042 PRFLIMINAR Y PLA T A PPL ICA TION Applicant' UP- Boulder Pnnds,I I :(contact: Deb Ridgeway) Address: 1 1d5.5 Viking Drive, Suite 350,rdeil Prairie. MN 55344 Phone#: 612,353.330 Email Address: Teel Ricllj ewgyp)Rxce3sigrJ.tE.c0w gee flViner ?13t11tit�lc tie-nttaclhcrcl Sectiar� A a Prelim Plat at �lRsatr n Vriittcu,Statetnet7�s Address: Phone ii: Email Address: Property Location(Address and Complete(long)Legal Description: -multiple-see attached tiechon l;of PrOhninary Plat applicatiol,11'rtiten S metits -- General,information of proposed subdivision: OP3 Boulder Ponds,LLC requests Preliminary Plat approval to subujivide the subject property into 60 single faiinily lots.38 Villa lots,64 seniur units and 2 coiiimercial oudots. please refer to the plan seta and attachments to this application for detailed infOrination on the proposed ncighborhood. Conducted pre-application meeting with Staff? �' Yes Q No in signing this application,I I:ereoy arknaveedge that I have read and fully understand the ap,;icable previsions of the Zoning Ordinance and current administrative procedures. t further acknovnedege the fee ax%anaticn as outlined in the app'ication pr--erlums and hereby agree to pay s received frc)m lire City pertaining to additional applintion expense. signature ofappfrm-lt:_ Qate: „l2/ta Signature of Fee Owner-we attache Date: S:IFORM,5\9anningrje,^.tForT.=•rerWts-Faarl,s, Gurreaffrelimiiiary Plat Appheation only- 10,7.1 i.doe1 Reveet 316` O14 2:31 PV it ls- CITY OF Lake Elmo City Hall 651-747.390D 3890 L creme Avenue Uclt Lake Elmo, MN 55042 AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT IKTEREST 1 herebv affirm tha, l am the fee title owner of the below described property or 'ha: I have wrtten authorization from the owner to pursue the described action. O P;Boulder Ponds for The Louis J.Damiani Revocabic Trust o October 6,2011 Name of acplicant and Timothy E. 'iontgornery (Please Pint) Street addressr1egai description of subject property 91�C Huron Blvd Beginning at a point 75 feet North of the Southwest corner of Section 34,T'oµmship 29,Mange 21;thence rtuming North alonf-the West line of sand scc6on 254.'-feet;thence rtnning Basterly on a line parallel to the South line of said section,a distance of 464 feet;thence running Southerly on a line parallel to the West line of said section,a distance of 284 feet more or less to the Northerly right of way line of Highway-No. 12;thence nLRning Westcrly alang said Northerly right of way d1 nc,a distance of 460 feet more or less tea il:c point of beginning:except Highway Parcel 29B MNDOT Right of Way Plat 82-43. The Louis J.Darniani Revocable Trust of October e,2011 Signature Date Timothy E. Montgomery � Signature date If you are not the fee owner, attach another copy of this form which has been completed try the fee owner ©r a copy of your authorization to pursue this action. If a corporation is fee title holder, attach a copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing this action. If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner,attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture or parttremhip. Rc,4.3 31117 U 9:12 ALI U 006%0212014 VON 13: 32 FAX E511 2E5 4r,99 St Paul R:verCentre 0001/001 0oc1 Post-It'Fax Note 7671 Data met. 1 f VV KJ From Li CoMem.l ca » _ Phone a Phone n "fh1L CITY OF- IT ~"' Z_ �.� Fax TAKE ELMO � - F,Yr: Lake Elmo City Hell 65t-747-3900 3800 Laveme Memo Nod Lake Elmo,BAN 55042 AFFIRMATION OF SUFFICIENT INTER ES T 1 hereby affirm that I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have Writtsn authorization from the owner to pursue the desaitled acton. OP3 Boulder Ponds for The I.ouis J.Dam;ani Revocable Trust of October 6,2011 Name of applicant and Timothy E.Montgomery (Please Print) Street address/legal description of subject pmpeq ±32;0 Huror,Blvd heginning at a point 75 feet North of the Southwest corner of Section 34,Township 2Y,Range 2 E;ihenct running North long the lti est line or said acction 284.1 feet;thence running Easterly on a hue par a lei to the South!Frye,of amid aeetion,a distance of 460 feet thence running Sauthcriy on a hnc paraUcl io the'1+trest livid or said section,a distance of 284 fcct more or Ins to the Northeriy right of way line of Hi+■ wayro.12;thence rmminp Nnrth,-rly righr nfway line.m&V.,nrr of Ri,rl frr+.mnrr its u¢c tac,Arrinin,of beginning,except Pighwzy Parce129B MINTMTRight of Way Plut 872-4.1. "'Fie Louis 1.Damian!Revocabi Trust or October 6,2011 le 7A -2-dr�� Signature ,,, eA Date Timothy P,.Montgomery Signature Date If you are not the fee owner,attach another copy of this form which has been completed by the fee owner or a copy of your authorization to pursue this action. if a corporation is fee title holder, attach a copy of the resolution of the Board of Direaors authorizing this 8Ctin7 If a joint venture or partnership is the fee owner,aitacli ii copy of aVreetfiei i authowtnq thrractui u„ behalf of the jolW,venture or partnersh,,p. Agrosed3r1=JA e:12AN T]II_ LNKT ELll40 Lake Elmo City HaV 651-747-3900 3800 L3.Wena A.enue t.0% Lake tlnra, MIN 551,1112 AFFIRUA 7ION OF SUFFICIENT Ill+TEREST I h=raby affirm that I am the fee trifle owner of the bJglc ., described property or that I have written authorization from the owner to pursue the des.rib---d action. Name of applisant QP Boulder Ponds [or Brerner Financial Services, Tnr. 'Please f;int;i Street addressAegat description o'subJeci property see attached description sketch ` Signature Date If you are not:the fee owner, attach anottrer copy of th;s form which has been completed by the fee owner Of a cop}+ci your authorization to pursue This astiorn. If a corporation is fee title holder, attach a copy of the resolution of the,Board of Directors authorizing this action. If a joint venture or partnershlp is the fee owner,attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behal`of the joint venture or p3rtne-ship. Re'm,d 3:1312C1:9J2'w� MUCH NO UESCRNOOK -of-PROPOSED PARCEL TO BE ACQUIRED - BREMER BANK -for- LAKEVIEW INVESTMENTS, LLC n ` NOP-TH CAS ,N Tom,a.71 wArw s+S or Lei t hoer.,. S h99'38'p2`VS' I.s-Sc r q I.c Le+hw x LW 1.ELoac 1. LAG(&r EUS iSS ray UU-01114 u-. E43r rarr.Pi U,ril r U-10 Am4rV.5 DESCMPTION OF MENIE i B19111 FAf3CH 1, ��. -,r C!Pori of tel. 1,fvn- 1.€. E "r D,•-T BaSniESS PARK JFJ «DIY.TIL'h,Y�oshirsp:x+ (,piety.U�n4gata cmcnaed cg (ocrwr I 61197e.ning of Ind eorlheosl corner a' gait Lot 1,Book t: }a- thence Sa�eh SP te7eee 39 Inisata.I32 ge_•or ds Waal, aawned 6dcrrls,along Lne ea-lh ti,or toic Lot t a �.� Cislanp0 e'28,06 toot; trldnce b_Jtn 03 decrees 47 m'net-i C6 sewn ds Ettl c 6ximbe,of 426.43 lee: to Lbe east line of Id LPL 1; In-roe North CB 40VOes LC' tmwtea 44) Oet-nos west Ncrlc sa:d east L71e o'01 t a ` dlstanca C'425.74 lecl rG 1he P"t oi begLining. Il e frarce'Area e 5 976 %a ft b ` L L4. ems- 1'jS -\ L1- 3rS� `v L IL J SS 1 l4 r 1 I •I E l+ereby ce.11ly that ILLS 7L-rnry Alan ' or report Mos repared by-r a'lAdf. ----+� •� my dy R0 tttelvd Lo and that!aT. e Cvy I�egklued La+tc Sune}u undr •`y Lat 1c.rg a! Iha Slat*of Uidaesote II I Gat^ 3/S7/t< Lcs,_a :r 41t,3 .1 Pfof [till# l Land SurONS, 91yors F firofcsslonal Lartd Surveyors 6776 Leike Drive NE,Sulie 110 Lino Lakes,MN 55014 IrLfL311741-IW3 fatmli71r.477i 'rHE.CITY OF j.,A K E ELMO , Lake Elmo City Hall 65;-747-3900 380D Ua erme Awnue N* Lakeam,MN 55042 AFFIRM14 T ON OF SUrFLIENT INTEREST i hereby affirm itia! I am the fee title owner of the below described property or that I have written, authorization from the ovxter tc pursue the described action. Name of applicant_ _QE3BatildeT P n s for EPS. Lake Lnke Fimn. I 1 - (Please Print) ."street address/legal description of subject property see attached description sketch The above noted property is subject to a Purch Agree betxvecn DPS-Lake Mrno&Lcnnar/U5I lames See attachcd email consent from I.ennAr/US Hotnes. S€gnature Ga;e If you are not the fee owner,attach another copy of this form which has been completed by the fee owner or a copy of your authorization to pursue this action. If a corporation is fee title holder,attach a copy of the resolution of the Board of Directors authorizing this action. If a joint venture or partnership Is the fee owner,attach a copy of agreement authorizing this action on behalf of the joint venture or partnership. Renod 30312G14 912 Alt Deb Ridgeway From: Tim Browr Sent: Friday, May 30.2014 3:53 PM To: Deb Ridgeway;Jessica Lytle Subject: FW: Lake Elmo- Boulder Cave Tim Brown Senior Mice President THE EXCELSIOR GROUP 11455 Vlking[rive, Suite 350, Eden Prairie, MN 55344 P. 612-353-3305 I C 512-802-6948 1 E:Tim.Brawn@E=efscorLt.C.com From:Steven Ach [mailto:Steve.Ach@Lennar.comj Sent: Friday, May 30,2014 3:49 PM To:Tim Brown; Alan Dale Subject: Lake Elmo- Boulder Cove Tim and Aran - As contract purchaser of a portion of the property include-di on the pretirninary plat st,bmittad by Oa3 Boulder Ponds. LLC for DPS-Lake—Elmo, LLC (as the fee owner), Lernar consents to the application submittal and DPS- Lake Elmo LLC signature on the application. Steve Ach Land Acquisitfor. Manager Lennar stove.ach!dlegnar.com wwvr.lennar.com Office: 952-249-3033 Cell: 612-600-1278 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 600 Plvmouth, MN 55446-4270 1 Lake Elmo City Hal! LAKE1ii1��c:i7�'11c ll e51-747-3900 LAKE ELN/10 3800 Lawne Avanuetvv:ln LakeEIrri,, U&I 55042 ACKNOWLEOGEMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY This is to certify that I arty making application for the described action by the City and that I am responsible for complying with ail City requirements with regard to this request, This application should be processed in my name and I ant tine party whom the City should contact regarding any matter pertaining to this application. I have read and understand the instructions supplied for processing this application. The documents andfor information I have submitted are true and correct to the best of my knowledge. I wilt keep myself informed of the deadlines for submission of material and of the progress of this application. I understand that this application may be reviewed by City staff and consultants. i further understand that additional information, including, but not limited to, traffic analysis and expert testimony may be required for review of this application. l agree to pay to the City upon demand, expenses, determined by the City, that the City incurs in reviewing this application and shall provide an escrow deposit to the City in an amount tc be determined by the City. Said expenses shall include, but are not limited to, staff time, engineering. legal expenses and other consultant expennseY_ I agree to allow access by City personnel to the property for purposes of review of my application. (?ri ylioLtcler Signature of applicants �� -- Date 60r14 7i[11t1}' Name of applicant I..Sfmior Vicc President Phone 612.353 y3i ,; '(Please Print) game and address of Contact(if other than applicant) Del)Ridgeway 0113 Boulder Pond-, LLC _ clo The Excelsior Group,LLC �l 145 5 VikinL'Drive,Sui1u 330 I.den Prairie,MN 55344 BOULDER PONDS Preliminary Plat Application Written Statements PUD Planned Unit Development Stage A. A listing cif contact information inclfrdirrq narrze(s), address(s)arrd phone rrurr2lrer(.c)of the otivrrer of record, authorized agents or representatives,engineer,surveyor and anj,other relevant associates. 1/3rd Owner Timothy E. Montgomery 6213 Upper 51st Street N Oakdale,MN 55128 C (612) 701-5616 ccri IllontRyahoo.corn 2/:3rd Owner The Louis J.Damiani Revocable Trust or October 6, 2011 c/o Security Bank& Trust Co Willam C.Kuhlmann 2202 11th Street East Glencoe,MN 55336 C(952) 239-2297 kill @securi:�3>banlcs-traist.can i Triangle (East) DPS - Lake Elmo, LLC Alan Dale 6007 Culligan Wiry Minnetonka,MN 55345 0 (952) 288-2201 C (612) 716-3793 adale(tdaletileco.com l.ennar Corporation Steve Ach 1G305 36thAvenue N,Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 0(952) 249-3033 C(612) 600-1278 steve.achOQ lennar.corn Triangle (West] Bremer Bank Kathleen Tucci 8555 Eagle Point Blvd PO Box 1000 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 0 (651) 434-4744 knitucci(@uhrenler.cnnl Page.1 of 1' PUI-C178sCr' OP3 Boulder Ponds,LLC Timothy 1. Brown- Senior VP C/o The Excelsior Group, I.LC 11455 Viking Drive,Suite 350 Eden Prairie, MN 55344 0(612) 353-3305 C(612) 802-6948 'rim.lirownCeD xcelsioi•[.LC.com Asset Manager Deb Ridgeway OP3 Boulder Ponds,LLC c/o The Excelsior Group, I.LC 114-55 Vilcing Drive,Suite 350 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 O(612) 353-3307 C (612) 590-9978 Deb.Ridgeway of xcelsinrLLC.com Associate Jessica Lytle OP3 Boulder Ponds, LIZ c/o The Excelsior Group,LLC 11455 Viking Drive,Suite 350 Eden Prairie,MN 55344 0 (612) 353-3316 ]essica.[.vdeCw,Excel:siorLLC.com Project Mgr Raymond Pruban Aniaris Homes,LLC PO Box 251276 Woodbury,MN 55125 O(651) 426-OS84 C(651) 24 8-363 1 rprubaiz(3,rmar•iscustorrilioit'!es.com Site Planning; Rick Harrison Rick Harrison Site Design O (763) 595-0055 i•harrison(perfornianceLilanninisystem.cam Site Engineering Dean Robbins,PE Evolution Engineering C (6S1) 303-7208 evo)utionengineeriizyn,n@gniail.com Pa-F'?12 Of 11 Engineering Oversight(incl Wetlands,Turn Radius, Sit,Street Sections) Dave Wommel, PE Short, Elliott,Hendrickson (SLH) 1.200 2Sth Avenue South PO Box 1717 St.Cloud,MN 56302-1717 0 (320) 229-4349 C (320) 293-5464 dhinmmelOsehinc.com Landscape Plans Karyn Luger Short,Elliott,Hendrickson (SEll) 10901 Red Circle Drive,Suite 300 Minnetonka, Mho 5534-3 0(972)91.2-2608 klugerCa�sehinc.com Surveyor Jason Rud lard Surveyor- E.G. Rud and Sots D(651) 361-8200 Marketing Charlie Devine Real Estate l?rof'essionai Advisor Edina C (6-12) 220-0 140 devinecfa�iclaud.com Page i i Of ii R. A listing of the following site data: address,current zoning,parcel size in acres and square feet, property identification numbers(PID)and current legal description(s). MAIN PARCEL TRIANGLE(EAST') TRIANGLE(WEST`) AI1i1RESS . 91201ludson Blvd n a _ n/a CURRENT ' RT LDR BP ZONING PARCEL SIZE Acres 58.87 0,62 0,14 5 .Ft 1 2,564,377.2 26,943 6,098,4 PlDs 34-029-Z1-32-0001 n a n a 34-029-21-33-0001 34-029-21-33-0002 LEGAL DESCR That part of the East Half That part of the East Half of the That part of Lot 1, Block 1, Eagle of the Northwest Quartet- Southwest Quarter of Section 34, Point Business Park 301 Addition, of the Southwest Quarter ; Township 29, Range 21, Washington County, Minnesota and the West Half of the ' Washington County, Minnesota 1 described as beginning .at the West Half of the as described as commencing at northeast corner of said Lot 1,Block Southwest Quarter in the northwest corner of said East L thence South 89 degrees 38 P Section 34, Township 29, Half of the Southwest Quarter, minutes 02 seconds West, assumed Range 21, Washington thence South 00 degrees 02 bearing,along the north line of said County, Minnesota, lying minutes 55 seconds West, Lot 1 a distance of 28.08 feet;thence North of the Borth line of assumed bearing,along the ~vest South 03 degrees 47 minutes 08 Minnesota department of ; line of said East Half distance of' seconds Fast a distance of J126.49 Transportation Right of 756.99 feet to the point of feet to the east line of said Lot 1; Way flat No. 82-43 filed beginning of the parcel to be thence North 00 degrees 00 minutes March 22, 1982, as described; thence South 16 40 seconds West along said east line fDoatment No.429592. degrees 08 minutes 55 seconds of Lot 1 a distance of 425.74 feet to East, atom, the centerline of the the point of beginning. pipeline .Easement described in Document No. 3172091, a i distance of 437.96 feet thence South 89 degrees 55 minutes 22 j seconds 'Jest a distance of 122.1.7 feet it) said west line of said Cast Half; thence North 00 degrees 02 minutes 55 seconds East along said west line a distance of 420.85 feet to the point-of beginning. i I Page 11 of 11 C. A listing afgeneral information including the proposed name ofthesubdivision, the numberof proposed rats, acreage dedicated for(;pen space or public use,acreage dedicated within rights of wcry. Acreage Boulder Ponds Main Parcel 58.87 Triangle(East) 0.62 TOTAL.Gross Area 59.4.9 Residential 5F Lots(60) 13.41 Villa Lots(381, 8.82 64-hail Senior 2.4£ TOTAL 24.69 Commercial Outlot M 4.21 Outlot) 3.50 TOTAL 7.71 ROW 51"Street(MSA Rd) 5.46 Cobblestone Pla?a 1.92 internal Res'l Streets 5.45 TOTAL 12.83 Park Linear park 3.85 Open Space (Wails,sidewalks) Trails 0.88 Sidewalks 1.10 TOTAL 1.98 Open Space (medians,islands,cul de Outlots sac) A Cul de Sac 0.14 a Cul de Sac 0:08 C Cut de Sac O.I1 P Cul de Sac 0.10 F Island 0.01 F Island 0.09 Island 0.01 1I Median 0.06 Median 0.07 R Median 0.16 TOTAL 0.84 Open Space (ponding,wetlands) Outiots L Pond 1.48 (commercial) N Pond (511,St) 2.51 G Infiltration Pond 2.41 P Pond(residential) 1.03 Q Pond/Wetland 1.69 (residential) TOTAL 9.12 Pape Ii of 11 D. An explanation of how issues have been addressed since sketch plat phrase of the development. • Northwest Alignment of road adjacent to Bremer Bank property ON Boulder Ponds, LLC has entered into a Purchase Agreement with Bremer Financial Services, Inc, to purchase a 0.14 acre parcel,which-will be additional Sth Street right-of-way (Mko. As agreed by staff,the cost of this purchase will be shown as a fee credit in the Development Agreement. • Eastern Alignment connecting to Dale Properties and Lennar Savona Subdivision OP3 Boulder Ponds, LLC has an agreement with Lennar Corporation to purchase 0.62 acres to facilitate the realignment of 51h Street • Access to adjacent parcels(Lamperts&Star liver Holdings) Starting immediately across from Cobblestone Path traveling along both Cranky Ape and Lamperts Lumber property boundaries to the eastern edge of the property adjoining the Lennar/Alan Dale parcels,the developer has agreed to extend the ROW to those boundaries, understanding that if a 429 process for Sth Street does occur,it would then be appropriate for those parcels to participate in the cost sharing of these improvements. • Ghost Platted Lots 5-9 Since the triangle piece is under Purchase Agreement with Lennar it is no longer shown as a ghost plat_ • Flexibility from Zoning Ordinance must be documented at time of PUD/Prelinninary Plat Boulder Ponds creates an opportunity to use the City's PUD ordinance to enhance the uniqueness of this development. The PUD is a tool that provides flexibility from the standard zoning ordinance to create a better overall design with a mix of land uses. Even with the site limitations(i.e. wetland,Sth Street alignment,gas& power line easements),we feel that Boulder ponds achieves and exceeds the City's PUD goals. rage 21 of 11 I Deviation from Underlying Code for Bouider fonds Planned Unit Development 10 PrQvosed MDR Proposed Min LOL 81000 7.206 7,000 7,347 Average 8,000 9,735 7,000 10,114 Max Lot 8,000 17,402 7.000 18,906 Min Front 25 2ir/25 25 20/27 Min lntSide 10 5/10 10 5/10 N otes: • There are only four lots tinder 8,000 SF (e.g. 7,206, 7,341, 7,93S, and 7,951).See attached to bulaLion of lot sizes for farther detail. • Staff required 60' ROW versus proposed 50' ROW. To accommodate this requirement, front yard setbacks were reduced to 20' minimum to house and 25' minimum to garage;however,the overall distances remains the same. • Due to irregular shape of lots, the majority of house pads do not run parallel to the side yard lot lines. Therefore, a minimum S' setback is the proposed, but average 10'. Related to engineering comments, please see attached response to Focus Engineering comments dated March 31,2014, Recent discussions were initiated by staff related to house front elevations in that no more than 60 percent of Errant elevation be garage. Mille this requirement could not be found in the City's zoning ordinance, Boulder Ponds requests flexibility from the 60 percent standard. It is important to allow for 3-car garages within a suburban development like Boulder Ponds. With the proposed.side yard setbacks,the larger 60 foot lots allow for a 50 foot pad_ Assuming a 34 foot wide 3- car garage,the front elevation is 68 percent garage. For the smaller Villa lots,a 2- cat-garage means the front elevation will be 60 percent garage and 72 percent with a 3-car garage. The Villas lots wgll contain a mix of 2-and 3-car garages,likely a 2 to 1 ratio. • Phasing Plan In order to best balance the site, Boulder Ponds will be graded at one time in its entirety,including 51t, Street and oversized ponding to accommodate St Street. The Preliminary Plat illustrates construction-phasing. The 15'-Phase includes all improvements to serve 27 Single Family lots,20 Villa lots and stubbed services for the commercial and senior lots. If SO Street does not become a IT29 project,it will be constructed from the eastern property boundary to approximately 300 feet west of the Cobblestone Plaza intersection as part of the I,;,phase. 'The 2ne Phase develops 33 Single Family lots and 18 Villa lots. t'age 11 of 11 • Street Geornetrics SEH prepared a turtling radius plan as submitted with preliminary plat documents. We feel that the large ladder fire truck is the most reasonable test vehicle for the development,which allows for adequate turning movements within the development. There will be rare occasions that a 65 foot semi-truck will access the neighborhood and might drive over the curbs of the internal curvy streets. However,the homeowners association will be responsible for landscape repair that occurs as a result of these instances. • Meandering Walks&Trails The developer has worked with staff to ensure the sidewalks and trails through the 5th Street corridor are within the ROW. Any sidewalks outside of the ROW internal to the development will have easements 2 feet behind the sidewalks. • Wetland Conservation Act SF.H prepared a wetland delineation report that has been submitted to South Washington Watershed District. A TEP meeting is Eyeing scheduled for early June and approval is anticipated prior to the Planning Commission and CiLy Council meetings. in addition,the MPCA permit application was submitted on Ml ay 23,201h. The goal is to begin grading concurrent with Preliminary;Plat approval. Park Land Dedication Stall`has concluded the park dedication is net of 10U' buffer and external ROW. lased on these assumptions,we calculate park dedication as follows: Total Site Acreage 59.56 Commercial (9.12) External ROW (7.52) Buffer L183 Total subject to Park Dedication* 40.09 *Note:It is not clear if wetlands are subject to park dedication.. Excluding wetlands,land area would be 39.66 acres. Boulder Ponds proposes a 3.€35-acre linear park on northern border of site adjacent to Stone Gate Park. This is proposed for two reasons: • This is the area where the"Y" trail connection at 5th Street is proposed. This will provide.an aesthetically=pleasing connection to the park. • The wider trail area increases the buffer to Stone Gate Estates,which softens the impact between the neighborhoods. For the commercial parcels,the developer is proposes to make all trail improvements as an offset to any remaining park dedication fees. Page 13 or 11 E. A norrath,,e explaining the intent of the project and/ot-flour origitral ar revised vision for the finished project. The intent for the Boulder Ponds Project has remained consistent with the Concept PUU approval. Minor changes include eliminating some of the standard single family lots in favor of smaller Villa s`eyle lots that offer an association maintained lifestyle to meet market demand. The overall neighborhood design goals include: • A curvilinear development designed around the existing topography of the site,as opposed to a more common grid layout (Note:The attached aerials illustrate this concept) • A single family development where duality,local home builders can build custom homes providing an alternative to production Built homes. • To limit double fronted lots,specifically related to 5th Street. • To design premium lots with maximum open space. • To create oversized cul-de-sacs to enhance site lines. • Varying house setbacks v0th meandering sidewalks to create a duality neighborhood offering visual interest. F, 5tatementshowitkq the proposed denshyy of the project with the method cif colculating said densityshown. According to the Comprehensive Plan,the site has a combined zoning of LDR. MDR and Commercial as illustrated in-attached Apparent Density Map. Based on anticipated 501 Street location,the Comprehensive Plan contemplated 146-262 units for this site. Due to site constraints(grading, Sth Street MSA requirements, pipeline easement and wetland), Sth Street was moved south. Boulder Ponds proposes a mix of housing styles:60 Single Family lots,38 Villa lots and 64 Senior units with potential for expansion. The site area net of the ROW,ponds,wetlands and commercial is calculated at 24.7 acres. This creates an overall average density of 6.56 units per acre. As noted by staff in the approved Concept PUD,the density of Boulder Ponds meets the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. G. Discuss the proposed infrastructure rmprovemenrs and phasing rherenf'(Le.proposed roadways,sewersystems,water systems,sidewalks/trails,parking: etrJnecessary to serve the subdivisions See attached phasing,plan enclosed for more information. 19,PHASE (beginning August 2014) • Due to site balance issues,the entire site will be mass graded. • Cobblestone Plaza to be fully constructed • Cobblestone Path to be fully constructed • Pebbles-tone Place to be fully constructed • Boulder Fonds Parkway to be fully constructed north of Sth Street to the phasing line on the north boundary of Lot 10,Block 4, • Sth Street will be fully constructed from the eastern property boundary to approximately 300'west of Cobblestone Plaza. rage 21 of 11 2.1 PHASE(be inning May 20151 • Pebblestone Terrace to be fully constructed • Pebblestone Ridge Cove to be#filly • Completion of Boulder fonds Parh-ti4,,ay north&west of phasing tine • Completion of Sth Street *Dote:"Fully constructed" refers to completion of sewer&water systen-.s, roadways,trails, sidewalks &landscaping) H, A narrative addressing concerns/issues raised bj,neighboring properties. The only concern was raised at the public hearing by a Stone Gate Estates neighbor. It was requested that the trail be located as farsouth as possible. This has been achieved as much as the grades will alloti�. 1. A description of haw conflicts with nearby land uses(livability, value,potential hrture development,etc)crud/or disturbances to wetlands or natural areas are being avoided or mitigated. • The increased buffer between Stone Gate Estates to the north softens the impact of the lotsizes between the two neighborhoods. • The senior housing provides a.transition between the commercial and residential uses. • 5th Street provides a separation of the residential neighborhood from the surrounding commercial uses. • The southern portion of the Boulder Ponds along Hudson Blvd is proposed to be commercial which supplements the existing commercial uses. The existing wetland is being preserved. J. Provide justification that the proposal will not place an excessive burden on roads(traffic), sewage, water supply,parks,schools,fire,police,or other public services(including traffic flows)in the area. Roads/Traffic • The developer is participating in the construction of Sth Street,a regional MSA road that runs east/west. The City of Lake Elmo has studied.#tie area and determined the new MSA road will be sufficientto serve the new developments in the area. In addition to participation with the construction of 5th Street,the developer is proposing the construction of a north/south road connecting Hudson Blvd to Sth Street • Future turn lanes are shown on Hudson Blvd,which arc planned for installation when Hudson Blvd is expanded. Sewer • The site has gravity seweraccess along Hudson Blvd thatis served by the regional sewer system. This additional capacity has been accounted for in the City of baize Elmo's Comprehensive Plan. Page 11 of 11 Water Supply • Water will be served by Oakdale's water supply until such time the City of Lake Arno can run its own trunk lines to the wider regional development area.Staff has indicated there is sufficient water to serve the development. Parks • The developer is proposing a 3.85 acre linear park that will connect to the regional system.Staff has indicated that the trail construction or other related improvement casts maybe used as an offsetto park dedication fees. It is understood that the City is not requiring additional parkland. Fire /Police The streets were designed to accommodate.a ladder fire truck. Boulder Ponds is primarily residential,which tends to have less calls per capita than other property t.yp Other • NIA K. if oppiicable.provide u description of propusYd lakeshore access. N/A I._ A description of parks rind/or open space.Please include a briefsratement on the proposed ownership sf soid areas. Parks i See Section D,'Parkland Dedication'for Park details. • The park area will be dedicated to the City of Lake Elmo upon final plat. Open Space • Outlots A through 1 and OUtlot R are cul-de-sacs,islands and median open spaces.These areas will be dedicatee:and maintained by the homeowners association. The Willa sub-association will be responsible for grounds maintenance(landscaping and snow rernovall for the Villa lots, Ponding and wetland Outlots L,N,0,P,and Q will be dedicated and maintained by City of Lake Elmo. • Sth Street ROW will be dedicated and maintained by the City of Lake Elmo. M, A proposed development sch Jule indict tinter approximate date when construction of the pForecr or- stages of the satire can be expecting to begin and be completed(jncluding the proposed phasing of construction of public improvements and recreational and comlrron space areas). Aug 2014-Commence grading immediately following preliminary plat approval and issuance of grading and watershed permits • Sept/Oct 201,-- installation of utilities upon final plat approval and execution of development agreement. Page 11 of 11 • Nov 2 014- 1st lift of asphalt • May 2015- Ist phase sidewalks and landscaping • )ulv-Oct 2015 - 2nd phase construction • May 2016- 2nd phase sidewalks and landscaping • Regional trails to be built concurrent with adjacent phasing Page 11 of 11 SKETO ID DES 0REPTION —of— PROPOSED PARCEL TO BE ACQUIRED —BREMER BANK -for—LAKEVIEW INVESTMENTS,LLC 1 1`O 111�Ti� .Fs:CLAD=00"m y^a _ In sic s..Tm" —`CAST wD•WOWJA r' 515�1"yR W+,t)�.. JA=t;E*F C*%4"Or tat W.4 4 SLOW.J r [11L OW7/.A1'Y.PON!AD AWrrot+ lAr NT IWwFSF.PY /RN it DESCRIPTION OF BREMER BANK PARCEL TO BE ACQUIRED That pV1 o Lot t. Bloc.. 1. EAaS PON, 649tESS PARK]FL ADDI71!x., Mcs.Ftgtnr County,M!4uxbto deemhre as fd.nwr i� bCQwrt.ra rl thr nWtht l corns. of Gaid tel I Bled. r 1 !nurse Soutr 88 degr�% 3E..Autos 07 seceres Mess. Cwjrn*d bearing,sees the north Nfe o!sad at t a +�` mltrtce of 7&C? froL- lnru Swtr 03 dtWwa* A7 Tr tRutro 05 S=Wds Enat n&state*of 426.49 tool to;h* ' .loot fau 0 e C t 3 t; Thehee Nora- as row Of o m�nfta 4:lrecmds wcst �(71i saki swt fira of Lb; t r, e Ye C"slcrtee of 425.7A feet is the poet of r";rri q. Faoet Arec*- 5.476 sa. ft. =' $ tA Ti „ r . to r LSJ •.f�r-A e F L'•i_.\pall:._....4 _" �j'.. rYy it V..J 1 La_ Lt� \YI s 1 1 • { ;. 1 -1 L 1 J rY1 c -YE -l //////jjjJJ) L_ l I I 1 herd cerlify 0.o1 Ws wry an 7 Y, b _a repae am preaarM by me o-undo- ' tyos r_� I.` my&net sJpervlson and that t orn j a duly Re-aped Lend 540wsfa Ir1641" !•i the M�-of the Slot. of Nin-arts �9 _- csrr Ka 41575 E_G ROD a SUNS. tN ._ P" Professional land Surveyafs LlnoBlakes.pMN 65Ui41te tic W.hfP) 1'5;w 1411611i¢t SKETCH AND DESCRIPTION -of-PROPOSED PARCEL TO BE ACQUIRED -for-OP3 SOL11DER PONDS,LLC iw W.1i sic M.1.74.tt]- 11tJ>/c i�i k It It i l t i DESCHIMON Of PARCEL ` TO BE ACQUIRED t ii Ins!Imn o: 1--1e Ecat Nclf of Inn scwtnwest.rv�ter ct 34, 7ownahy 29. ltc,4u 21.lsoshitptor Covnty, Uensaatc asaera"bt m4ba= t t cbMwnaaaag al [a+e rart'wW,erns or sad�rI ffal of The Sevtnwesl rfoftc U.aMe Sautry Lb de8fees O2 rwwics 4•�`anda Wn:-aswmea o[fam„ eo[t� llm rest 1'cm of"c Cast Hall a distance of 758.ffdi feet la the poi•,t of i ttg-^A;z- el tee paces to be dcsenbet. iMnce Swtr. 16 aegreas Oe Ma tes 5t i aacwnd Eoe4 vlong Ute mterlhr of tee Pgetuw Eaaareet deetlaed to t Cwxann:No. 3t7209', c cftLwcs of +448.37 tell. tne[,ee Smttf Ire Cages- sfnutn 2? +aeertds daast a&stance of 125.07 feat to say&west .t =f so.,: i East Hm't thctcr North w degota m r.:w:ss 30 aecnds£ost, ilang abA 'V � .cst 1+te c aktance of 4-A85 feet to the Camf a'brgf^N17 1 1 V r 1 tit � It 1 ti 1, t t ;. Mr I he-eov ceruly toad I"sL+vay. Cron be Teperl wm f "cred by fr2 ar wbft— t S r + i__ y my aiack WperrfaJp+sd its: 1 orr _ t a d.:y RspJstsrd land Su[veyr under ST' ii I t tht tawt cf Ine Slots of lttn=M t tt ��tit rh•. E 7 Lott srr7n0:4 l,x:aaew 1'.a, 412.76 _ t t V i V t `1 1I t _Eo- R 1 R S NC IN . Professional land Surveyors 4776 Loke Drive NE,Suite 110 Una Cokes,MN SS014 1[L ltitl li l.a:Y! faKf6tly la7.Fitr I NORTH App arrenl Density For Current Zoning 146 minimurn(262 maximum 100'Buffer - - 131,691.60 SO FT Approx 3.02 Acres Low Density Residential 518,255.42 SQ FT Approx 11.89 Acres -� (11.89 x 2.0 min = 23.78 Units) (11.89 x 4.0 max = 47.56 Units) 1 2 S L a Medium Density Residential 1,336,637,47 SQ FT Aprox 30.68 Acres (30_68 x 4 min = 122.72 units) (30.68 x 7 max = 214.76 units) 7 _ _ I Commercial 549,774.28 SQ FT Approx 12.62 Acres ' -i GC' Suer 123.1 1 4 83 SO PT Low Density Residential 1 ,261 ,089.81 SQ FT 28.95 Acres 60 Single Family Units 18 Villa Units 78 Units Total = 2.69 Unit Per Acre '&!N IILIM Lie,I.-Il •ResiderN rl 4-54.566.3e SO 1— External ROW 'C)43 fi Amer, 51h St m-5.391 U U111ri 01111; Cobblestone Path =2134 64 snit Senico 1-lo.,_iri.4 External ROW=7.525 Acres 8t 70m, unit{ 8.11r Onus Per A:r_ Commerical 9.187 Acres Boulder Yoncts - Density Analysis Under f%---JUrrentLoning Commercial 247,661.18 SCE F1 Min Required !nits 1.46 -Mia Allowed Units, 262 'Gflmrnercral 55?.523,73 SCE F1 Pr-oposed 162- Units r: Lot Block F.adln -Sc F:L Reauired Zmma 1 2 1st 15.836 81000 LDR 2 2 1st 9,873 6.000 LDR 3 2 1st 8620 8.000 LDR 4 2 1st 8005 8,000 LDR 5 2 1st 9105 8.000 LDR 6 2 1s1 11483 8.00E LDR 1 1 2nd 6192 7000 MDR 2 1 2no 7347 7000 MDR 3 1 2nd 8040 7000 MDR 4 1 2nd 89Lj 7000 MDR 5 1 2nd 9934 7000 M17R 6 1 2na 9814 7000 MDR 7 1 2nd 10214 7000 MDR 8 1 2nd 13582 7000 MDR 9 1 2nd 18906 7000 MDR 10 1 2nd 11049 7000 MDR 11 1 2nd 8680 7000 MDR 12 1 2nd 2975 700D MDR 13 1 2nd 8194 7000 MDR 14 1 2nd 8994 7000 MDR 15 1 2nd 8614 7000 MDR 16 1 2na 10965 7C00 MDR 17 1 2nd 10413 7000 MDR 18 1 2nd 96T 7000 MDR 1 3 Is, 1178E 8000 LDR 2 3 1sl 8428 8000 :SYR 3 3 1st 83D5 8000 LOR 4 3 1st 7935 B,DDD WR Below Undarlyirtg Zoning 5 3 1st B174 3,0m LDR 6 3 1st 10298 8,0D0 '-OR 7 3 1st 7341 8,0DG LDR Below Undetiyi,19 Zoning 8 3 1st 7206 8,003 LDR Below LlnaMyi.ng Zoning 9 3 1st 8128 8.000 LDR 1.3 ,i 1sl 7951 8,00 LDR Beim 1.lnaertying 2aning 11 3 1st 92E1 8.000 LDR 1 4 1sl 8716 8,000 LDR 2 4 tst 9510 8,000 LDR 3 4 1st 0309 8.000 LDR 4 4 1st 9199 8.000 LDR 5 4 ist 8532 8.000 LDR 6 A 151 84BG 8.00D LDR 7 A is; 7959 8.000 LDR 8 4 1st 10046 8.000 LOR 9 4 1s1 8255 8,000 LDR 1G 4 1st 82BO 8,000 LJR 1 2 2rd 17402 8,000 LDR 2 2 2nd 12514 8.000 LDR 3 2 2nd 9526 8.000 LDR 4 2 2nd 9327 8,ft00 LDR 5 2 2nd 9190 8.(W. LDR, 6 2 2nd 9336 8,01M LDR 7 2 grid 9•a36 8,0% LDR BouldeF Ponds La:517eZ,.Xl5 ?age 1 at 2 P1inf?d &SW2014 5.47 Pim 1.Ow. !3loclt .4dCln Sa;l. Rpninred Zoning 8 2 2nd 6346 8.000 LDR 9 2 2nd E334 8.000 I DR 10 ? 2nd 8399 6,000 LDR 11 2 2nd 8251 8,000 LDR 12 2 2nd 8173 8,OCv LDR 1 3 2nd 12072 8,00In LDR 2 3 2nd 12282 alwo LDR 3 3 2nd 1(1757 8,000 LDR 4 3 2nd 12142 6,000 LDR 5 3 2nd 106% 8.000 LDR 6 3 2nd 14503 8.000 LDR 7 3 2no 955E 8.000 LDR 8 3 2na 0590 6,000 Lt)R fi 3 2rd 9748 5.000 LDR 10 3 2rd R443 8.000 LDR 11 3 2" 8019 8,000 LDR 12 3 2nd 80%Id 81000 !.7R 13 3 2nd 8539 6,000 LDR 14 3 2nd 10171 8.000 LDR 15 S 2nd 9060 8,000 -DR 16 3 2nd 9552 81000 LOR 17 3 2nd 10732 8.000 LDR 18 3 2nd 8720 3,000 L.12R 18 3 2nd 8964 8,Ow9 LDR 20 3 2nd 10649 8.000 LDR 21 3 2nd 15226 8000 LDR 19 1 151 8993 7000 LDR 20 1 1st W91 7000 LDR 1 1st 17447 7000 LDR 2 1 1s! 11570 7DD0 LDR 3 1 1st 13465 70DO LDR 4 1 1s1 1079D 7000 LDR 5 1 1st 11535 7000 LDR 6 1 1st 008 7000 LDR i 7 1 1st 8907 74400 LOR 8 1 1st 8438 7D00 LDR 9 1 1st 8724 7000 LDR 10 1 1st 8725 7000 LDR 11 1 1st 10999 7000 t.DR 12 1 1Sl 933S 7000 LDR 13 1 1st 8562 7000 LDR 14 1 121 1t1419 7000 LDR 15 _ 1 161 11154 7000 LDR 16 1 1st 7729 7000 LDR 17 1 151 7549 7000 LDR 18 1 1st 10519 7000 LDR EADR MDR LDR Min L.ol Size-Retl 7000 7DOO 8000 Pronosed hu 1 D,083 10.146 9.735 Nroposed 1,4en 7,347 7549 7.206 Proposed Max 18,906 17,447 17,407 Boulder Ponds Lot Szcs.x s Page 2 of 2 Primed 5,W/2014 5 47 PM 11rA11 ����ttt jn ss . t+ i• f4! i� ��101{i �1 Lli _- �a (j)Jl� - i 1 � _ ' ,,`t. �. fit,, ,�t-r-f�`�� {'• �: f ;.I - ��, .T�!`. . A ' K' Dn Received. 11 tt: C11,Y ()I: 651-747-390C Received 9y.. LN K E ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue WO pew Lakeelme tr1N 55042 ,.w LAND USE APPLICATION ❑ ✓anip:etxencive Pia:i ❑Zonirry Distrc?Amend ❑ Zcning Text Amend ❑ Vanance'(see bello )❑ Zoning Appeal ❑ Conditional Use Permit(C_U P.) ❑ Ffflod?.air.C t;P ❑ interim Use Permit(i.U.P.) ❑ Excavating/Grading ❑ Lot trine Adjustment ❑ Knor Subaiivisson ❑ Residentiai Subdsvis:on Sketch/Conc,_0 Plan ❑ PUD Connep!Plan ❑ PUD Preliminary Plan ❑PUD Final Plan Applicant; L�P,�I3csulti�r Pc>t�d ,,I,t,C,��ontact! Deh Ridgeway'. Address: 114,;5 filing Dri-ve,Suite 350,Palen Prairie,MN 55344 Pita-ne; 61 ,5313f12 Email Address: Deb.Rid gewayt_f1)Exce1,jor],Lc.com Fee d,:mer: . hin1UP relirniriil •Plat at,j4 nert Stated n c Address: Phoned Email Address-, Properly Localbons(Address and Complete(long)Lego Descr',pliom Multiple -we attached Section A of Preliminary Plat application Written Statements rDaiailed Reason for Request' Preliminary PUD and Plat approval to stibdivide tlic suhiect.t�rnpertty- and create a mixed use niekhbornUod including;CO sir is family scats,38 Villa lots,64 selliat�units and 2._comniercial outints. Please refer to the plan sets and WritteD StAlemeatti fcrr detailed_ nformatinii an this IM-piinsat. *Variance Requests: As outlined in Secf6on 301,060 C,of the take ElmD Municipal Code,file applicant must demonstrate waclk;aj difficulties before a Variance can be granted. The practical difficulties related to this application t:.a as fotlovws Pie gr t� rn c y`I"!)tEil �Lei11c11t5for delaifs ofreptu-st to signing this application,I hereby acknowledge lhat I have read an,"fuliy understisnd the applicable provisions of[lie Zoninq ordinance and current administrative arocedures. I further acknovAedae the tee explanation as outlined in the application procedums and ltereoy ag-0-#"--all ss Tweivad fromm 1ht,City pertaining to additional application expe9se. Signature of applicant: Date: 6f2114 Signature of fee owrnerYlea;e see.Aliirination n(Strtftcit-l! irttel•es.Ua'e: BOULDER PONDS Preliminary Plat Application Written Statements Preliminary Plat and information bby¢153.07. Please see Preliminary Plat Application submitted concurrently with this PUD application. General Information The landowner's name and address and his1her interest in tide subject proper•Eir OP3 Boulder Ponds, LLC is under purchase agreement to purchase the development site from Tim Montgomery and Louis J. Camani Trust, Bremer Bank and US Home Corporation conditional upon plat approval. Please see Preliminary Plat Application for addresses of all interested parties. 2_ The applicants name and address if different from the landowner, Please see previous point. I The names and addresses of all professional consultants who have contributed to the development of the PUD pion being submitted,including but not limited to attorney, land planne, engineer and surveyor; Please see section 2A of the Preliminary Plat Application. 4 Evidence that the applicant has sufficient control over the subject property to effectuate the proposed PUD, including a statement of all legal, beneficial, tenancy and contractual interests held in or affecting the subject property and including an up to date certified abstract of title or registered propero,report, and such other evidence as the City Attorney may require to show the status of title or control of the subject pr'ope1 tj' There is an executed PA on the property which will close upon Plat Approval. Multiple owners have signed the accompanying Affirmation of Sufficient Interest documents.We will work with the City to provide any additional rewired documentation. Present Status 1- The address and legal description of the property% Please see section 213 of the Preliminary Plat Application. 2. The existing zoning classification and present use of the subject property and all lands within 350 feet of the subject propertjt a. Subject Site is currently zoned RT- Rural Development Transitional.District. The site is mostly vacant farmland with a dilapidated single-family home and numerous shed buildings on the far south side near Hudson Road. All existing buildings are planned to be demolished prior to development. b. 420M220 Hudson Boulevard zoned C- Commercial. Owners are Crank_vApe.com who specializes in RV and Boat auctions and Lamperts lumber. c. Everything bordering the west side of the property is zoned as BP- Business Park/Light Manufacturing. Uses include the Nigh Pointe Health Campus (Class A medical building),an Orthodontics office,Bremer Bank and other similar uses. d. Everything bordering the north side of the property is RE-single-family residential estate.We are proposing all single family bordering that northern harder. e. Property on the northeastern side of the property is bordering UPS-Lake Mmo, LLC property currently zoned LIAR-- low density residential. 3 A map depicting the existing development of the subject property and all land within 330 f'eetof the subject property and showing the location of existing streets,property lines, easements, water mains,and storm and sanitary sewer:5, u►�ith invert elevations on and within 100 feet of the subject property. PI-ease see attached. 4, A written statement generally describhW the proposed PUD and the market which it is intended to serve and its demand showing its relationship to the City's Comprehensive Plan and how the proposed PUD is designed, arranged and operated in order to permit the development and rise of neighboring property in accordance with the applicable regulations of the City. Please refer to section 2E and 21'of the Preliminary Plat Application. 5. A statement of the proposed frnancinci of the PUD, The project will be funded by the ON Boulder Ponds, LLC via cash or bank financing if applicable. i a". Site conditions. Graphic reproductions of the existing site conditions at a scale of I inch equals 100 feet.All the graphics should be at the same scale as the final plan to allow easy cross-re_jerence. The use of overlays is recommended for arse of analysis. L Contours; minimum 2 foot:intervals; Please see Preliminary Plat Engineering Documents. ii. Location, type and extent of tree cover; Please see Preliminary Plat Engineering Documents. rri. Slope analirsis,• Please see Preliminary flat Engineering Documents. ill. Location and extent of water bodies, wetlands,strooms, and flood plams within 300 feet of the.subjecr propern;- Please see Preliminary Plat Engineering Documents. V. Significant rock outcroppings; NOT APPLICABLE vi, lxistinq drainage patterns; Please see Preliminary Plat Engineering Documents. vii. Vistas and significant views; NOT APPLICABLE viii. Soil conditions as they affect development Please see Preliminary Plat Engineering Documents. 7. Schernatic drawinn of the proposed.development concept, including but nor limited to the general location of major circulation ciewents,public and common open space, residential and other-land uses. Please see Preliminary Plat Application. S. Statement of the estimated total number of'dwelling units proposed for the PUD and a tabulation of the proposed approximate allocations of land use expressed in acres and as a percent of the total project area, which shall include tit least the following: i. Area devoted to residential use by building type; 60 single family lots at 13.41 acres and 38 villa lots at 8.82 acres. 64 Senior housing units are proposed on 2.46 acre Otttlat K. but will potentially he expanded to include an additional 2 acres from Outlot J for a total of 4.46 acres. ii. Area devoted to common open space; Cul-de-sacs and medians Outlots A-i iii. urea devoted to public open space and public amenities, NOT APPLICABLE iv. Approximate area devoted to, and number oj, off-street parking card loading spaces and related Access, Not.required for single family development and commercial outlots have not yet been platted. V. Approximate area, and floor area, devoted to commercial uses, OLtt1ULS j and M vi. Approximate area, und_jloor area, devoted to industrial or ogee use. Outlots j and M 9. Llrhen the proposed PUD includes increases in density of residential development alcove the base zoning district, a statement describing the site amenities L:o he included within the PUD, and demonstrating that the proposed site amenities sufficiently achieve the desired density bonus.Applicant is required to demonstrate that all site tmeni y standards have been met in order to be awarded increased density for residential development. This is not applicable as we are not proposing to increase density can the site. i0. When the PUD is to be constructed in stages during a period of tine extending beyond a single construction season, o schedulefor the development Qf such stRges or units shall be submiCCedsCating the approximate beginning and completion date for each such stage or unit and the proportion of the total PUD public or common open space and dwelling units to be provided or constructed during each such state anti overall chronology of development to be followed from stage to stage. Please refer to section 2G of the Preliminary Plat Application. ��. l then the proposed PUD includes provisions for public or common open space or service facilities, a statement describing the provision that is to be made for the cure and maintenance ofsuch open spoce or,set-vice facilities. There will be multiple items which will he tinder the care of a Homeowners Association. The structure will be: Boulder Ponds Master Association with 2 sub associations: one for the villas (Boulder Ponds Villa Association) and one for the single family (Boulder Ponds Single Family Association).Counsel has drafted the master document which is included here. Additional documents will be made available at more substantial completion. 12. filmy restrictive covenants that are to be recorded with respect to properhi included in the proposed PUD. Master Declaration and Sub Association Declarations will be recorded which will include rules&regulations and architectural guidelines. 13. Schematic utilities plans indicating placement of water,sanitary and storm sewers. Please refer to the Preliminary Plat Application. '14. The City may excuse on applicant from submittitT any specific item of information or- document required in this stage which it finds to be unnecessary to the consideration of the specific proposnL Noted, I& The Cio,may require the submission of arty additional information or documentation which it may firth necessary or appropriate to full consideration of the pr)posed PUD. Applicant is willing to cooperate with the City to provide any additional required items. DERV IFOITE 01-7 SURVEY ZRAPHIC SCALE -for-OP3 BOULDER PONDS,LLC -of- BOULDER PONDS Z: -0 6'. ------------ bb-- 6 3 z. 10 4-- rnz.. .-J 0% z i. ----------- 7" 4f 1M 7 4- M! 1mr-E 0 --- *Aw_ LEGEND 0.5 jpm 10__ A, xS im 1, L..(61—M? —It. L-7 MNOM­E I JUTI E1�j -D LL_ TREE DETAIL PROPERTY DESCRIPTION. ME ZE'",VIP— UIVI.,VWI� N�-�E SONS, IN(:. Professional land Surveyors 6 776 Lake Drive NE,Suite 110 Lino Lakes,MN 55014 Tcl.(651)361.8MD Fox(651)3614701 NORTH spuod .,apinog TO-— L ZtoE �tfL N 2 I a� LU LU to E O N C J fp ,.6 0 � m a)Co y m C'W O VJ N � m cJE NO 05 N R N C'a w a ��(AtA�W TI X =� [L WFJomN r��x o I 1 CAI.-Nc� r� U' W FJ�X(AF-20 W v \ j 11J 1 L j _ _ o G 12 CL O � v OIti�I.',; :; ; _ mil• --q - . - L.1,1 'i Ti is - � �pN, II i I �� 1 1 \i�41,�Lya.%p �.'%Y�+/ � • O G� _ ` N co m m w nn {f F U7 r a �1 ---��- ------ ---�'4�-� -------- - --- M _ J�mC � ..____~ all��- • -.-1, - ti _ , \ -OG e vO o a•c'z fn \ 1=S'ssC t1v V.`ccfn spuod .,apinog ? N z u } w n ui N O F O 2 a° « w �� C� W ! — 5 uUc '� Lu Ql z a — L w A 5 8 ti UN �}I W' J M o N i m 1 I I• — o aD p lu � N I L N � CA 1 ry n I I _ J J 4 O tl.l 1 Y x X I •� t I W 3 � 1 d � � I i I -• _ � &L �' m iul t-- L 73 Z O N N ! �- W rD ae Y .1 K u! o� Ci G L L [ 2 C a a � O) C h 4 G (` ; p u' _ = rr O � a (✓ 9 lv, 4 ,!) J: g � 11 a[ a a � �` C •" g C. 1 I o Ld lij cD OZ ..'J w �.: �.-G �. t r11 c N a' F ., J. , a L •p r1t ' �U., y ls; w e, r. w i y sjii �Iw=_ 1 Gr7Llp� J2p�(IO� .N _O,___ O__-.. O rn: m co.CD, m .n O n nl In m Z N w w p ZC'9LE=Afi' _ L -S9 O i m ,� F J U LLU U U1 r (D (ll'BB6-.3tl) e. LLI LU rj) Lu \ J 10 IL %c IL N w I Q .n • - W - J _ � U � I In- o. Ini al ai rn w co n n w to rn- rnl m m' rn rn m m - '42 � a ors m � eois Fez LLJ yy 3 S sLZi 1a �o� SLLJ y ��e xwx E r c D-� Wwa w�q# =a� 4 g< �Q� Z =o 6` r c 4 0 'P (COy o fi a z 7 o`ZS$ ¢ InQ m GF�= 8%, N€V =N< Ow> a2Q s yII-i1M1���u6� hf. U Fig} jail<l: T"j��R,- ">cw �m °'�dEN...IRIW Vd Y ui LLJ Pt$a<,<yaylW�� W - a gg YaP!% sk��aa gaQ'� 3=1 s i L wx��a=��Jgm 3�3 as gIs-g d�a m�olna s6, �g bx m`Y..Eu°i Oi<Noo�`w °�w�d BF �i ize c Sw, �o°waa'am � �k8 } �Wmo'31 � fmao%ffi' i s i 6 I%ob!Lbio u$ Na< � F ati� un< >g5^3�m� gt=k �wZ s� >� Tze cQffi 0`Stir U=aip�N�>mm4'>r�zi �g6> � s�swo <3 ag �'• r'z iofmk'•_ii'J! ��re' �jJY" alnx g`YWaAZ�" Bt I�a.<i . <WS�a i�i3<a��u�'G�mj ry n ♦n m n .o m _ spuo j .ippinog • f - o' - n0 'ZBYL6�AH w p�ena! 8 CI'9L6�AN W uosp�N z6i1t6-nw R C .tom- ' � � � asw F o�:• � Z ry J F• 1 0cW• 1( �m�1 is� 1 = 9 ,•t tl} V 111 o L"ii 1 W 3 P ' LU , a ° 113 e 3� N Nti j J d- 6e oam J 6Z-986-ANI O O O 0m 0 J T b 6C"996-ANI C. pl a u> o� 3AO8tl 33S F, In 6B'996ANI VZ - b46SLW1�Nl o L 1 � m 6B'BB6�NI \ _m 8L'O66nANl \\1 C) Z901�3N A Q M0138 33S If"£66=ANI I n A c p m » f ,3� IfJ O 1�1 O NlS'{66=ANI rv°1,5 mIC azW -ea Q.1^mo -�, / pp Dm nvZi � PC'9fifi=A lil �0�c -S VIbM�S v � � B;p6�l=ANI p 0v o `a.N & G� ¢- M 5$ 89'f66�AN1 ry 6 } 1 t Ei J" m s.is C"G66�Nl m 3 iv S _ -1 I I i I j '1 1 Y1'S66CC 1 ANI •. LU OD 1 I,• �! w 91'988=AI (� GUp�93 i 00'oo0l=ANNI m° 9 19900 �' W 8 E 9B'986=nNl A'0 }B ul Np 331 �I sb bm ' •I b3 U n Z r p �Y 19'965=ANI ' t9'966=ANI a ze 3pp HE ti.: ...... ._— - - _ $4as w3�pp..u7i LLI 1L'La01.AN1 pT to fn OZ'L86-ANI ui w ..0. In o .n, o' c ,� o. nI 0), QI. .D t L A3HS 33S - - -- � ' 'n 0 6133HS 33S Lwu cm / I` �� `C _ ui P, - ee m ui FF. SSC tu IN 01,165"Ni wVL'LOO' M w DZ'155-ANI rr'610i 4. U) .0 m u LU w LU U) w iS LU SG'ZW-ANI SO M6RANI z (wn Ln t'9"-ANI g g.966MNI M C, ED (L LIU OTOW, :AN, U). O 5 9 666ANI wtz*I I ui T) —- ,--a CID y z LU C) A' if A cl� 041DOI-ANI OV1001-ANI ZO'910.-� w w LU LU U) r goo-Ittil r A� gi ll I/ I R-6 Ot 133HS 33S C, C, spuod jappog e y c10 a0C. 0co N w R 2 6133HS 33S fang_ o9'Lro1-AM •k} ND LLJ LU 2 - «a N 2RMCO1 AM }6 95-N01-AM mod!✓>S -' v '6Y --- - ~ Irv• N ; N :n im_a16 �a Jt' ^off pp io 9j / ' '�I _ /tl,. 9Erof01-ANI m iSL A 4}9Zrof0I-ANI M ZI CL CD - ---, „ � __ - °� gym•. «�� 'oa m mlit m o ^'I •1^ lC'4Z01-ANI tP O lYLZ01-AM N T spy'py 'i '', •',y' , a ja 1 [ y ul Zrr o-Ia5}-LET t J �VX// 6 ��u�•d lir,-elolT r, yii 3Y e�e u o N- gg \. _V a✓. w s ` IL e tx. 'Ui �.�' _ •�` "1101-ANI 6Z01- - lip ♦6f..ZiT t � C F i 1 a 9 M a%-umn J 3 Z u w jR %N Z1'0101-AN1 t m ZZ'0101-ANI: Iw,�-pp1 I �i vls y1,• v i �— �: J dad b E! j I ,: assmwT ti . `.. "1 I •i •• CIT001 RANI A. u) LLJ LU s y i w LU t w 5th 9ueet _..�-Ib w '�b I _ 'n O iQ,wr 0- 0 c;puo,j ippinog 11133HS 33S �_o 0 o m 0 -0 Ln LL, o. F- C\j w u) 3: w u) LU F7 o1186-AN1 1t'4001-A I OZ'LBG�Nt -n LQt-U LLI Lu LU LU ~~mowLu co In ZrIDOI-ANI vie ZVBMI-ANI Ail R *Z'1101-ANI _j lag *V'1101-AM W u) sal l 4x D_ _Hft 331 QH 102 CML *Vrto1 rAml v4 L Hf 3 u LLsMI"ANI ) I. ou Ppd LU A Go A'� QO'IZOL-ANI ;D SI'IZOI-ANI L Irtzol�ml w AM ul u)7" Id .If 512 A list.. I OV9MI-ANI ­W OD CD a Ij WLCOI-ANI > w w y j u) 1w uj C u) c LwLj LLP r all D, In In C,cqi r1l c, 0 -- �_N spun, .,ppinog o N e N N o 0 0 0 0 o F N w ui +o S9'CZ01-ANI = M .+ cC%*DWm In `N Y !q M5-( mm { CS'CZDI-AN z \ C 1f9'LZDI'�N z _= m o a°N� .ma of ��:, i ;' • �d 3i< off' o m tip NIX 40 ��� add 0O m i V ` gdd B9'9ZOt-ANI _ (� dd , ` / _ o O i r 10 Q) "',ZOI-ANI LU adt _ S]yy fi'BZ01=ANI PS V W / add ..,.♦' - 'q � _ �d: 'm � �g u '4 N; - o.r-Pwit m J N = i.'t l\YQ.J �,�% bdd- ¢m �I �.'-:.,...-.•n �4 CL o� Ponds O —W a �o n n N C) m day. II- S%� Ot,; L•L ;tY;(�'} y r0 Or Or .O O O m L133HS 33S w o v o n c n a uj 0 0 0 0 0 0 o z L 133HS 33S r CS'CI0I"N' W (� w C 10t-AwY9 U edd `1r�,. OAH 9 n zi W 09'Cl01Mw r m 31 ♦ t 1 it _ Japin(� = OOY101-Aw I U) ...... ^1- 4 0tl; Wuj wee _gym i r W c� d `_O ! LYf tOI-ANI �p�f�F ZS;C l01-ANI o ; 1.52 NN m}j 0 1.,2-tFc Cds v�i i`+o ° a 8 w I -- -♦'t 1, C „ z; .I..I W� o.ts-ta•r .mm -s ♦ 1 L ,+ adi i I INX ¢nto wadd -" •, ` .. —"" elm �s� j :: otl W eC 99z10 in f 1=Aw BZ m m ^N SCz101-ANI 3 0.04-PogR it H ti add v' H cn ab 11 IL � L. cumv C W - "` jp Immo �5'� .,- SS'iae-ANI eo g r�` cFq=i .n 59.56 ANI /i,. . OV•' -fC` I 59:656i=w . ^� 171w l S 133HS 33S cpuod Jorpog 0 N: !+ G F > > O e w 2 _ � L - 4 •�r •,a i N 9� �} vnu « tau QJ 77 4k7 9133HS 33S �— w (!� x9 j I � � M N O N O N O in O O O 4 N N N O p o n J O O O O O O Co 0 L C � L O m L bo J < bd i ;a = z o p w i N uj ��Q v _ �u"pj99o� - rn DOUOOI.ANI WD w r as 1 od rnF to to 17.6 dd r i E� u 6 om OL'ODDI-ANI in ,+Fi-U j -,iO I \ r U / :-___.-- tl ��. OB'OODI.ANI 55 I a,�y y LB m { 6tl • �•.�J � w ■ �i V N•m � MTI-RYH i Lflj � � n ,.TIX I�r Pn isC.. sSA "` if I• BL'1ODI.AN1 { ".i/ j..�]�r.�� �•w - C__ �w>! BB'too 1�NI 2aP-MGw �a l_ a6i x I�� !: , , • 1 0 ••• aaw�Hr � �'Fyps bl i m Ez CIZDOI-AN, Oi 9 n 8aY' • e m N O' to :f. N N -._- p: p o 0 o. o Co sp{.Ic� •lap�nog 4:0 Z o N s u G ) 'T W N _ \ w (I� gyp ' i 8133HS 93S 8133HS 33S E; IL n u 'r2Lo 0 0 0 0 m i M Z �L. 0. CD ROM ---_.'• �:.� ��,' ry _ ��• I M w O in U w r ! w J/ w _ 40 ui U c o � =_ems:• i_ N vwi- IL B 133HS 33S Lu Um �sx— a limtui1 j }7.' s may Aenq�ed }eGuod m kf —cW£L[ S { ! 1 OCC•nA{ ` u a> rOj'; N cOv O I spuod .,apinog 6 G N e ��cL 0o amo:o f a+ 0+ m m z "x m w �� 3$ Lu _ MN„YZ- t ^ - M.1Z-/LBL6-AN M.12-„� 6YBL6`AN1 z� Ni s O'686- H L- C. � ti --I-LI SC6-ANI ^o • l > S.IL_ZD'�=NI -o'p 1•- 1-10'LC 6_w W eZeld 9 A,.BI-LL'CB6-ALU NI �B_ V l S _ saw aJ W .....,. _ 'a ^ En : z. m e Lit m n- W ((� co 3.P 1-01 t FBANI P� 8 00"BL6-ANI 0 OOMY 00'YL8-AM LU n�g$�n ngo e�� +/.5 c:-00'16_Aw pQ o^ o 3y� _ z... . a.....I T, a� W x o5ooco mm000mo � C, . , m. e• . . . m rn rn. U J ^moo$ _Inog uospnLl .. i 1 8 R 'o mi$ i s g 7 2 HH", -mmmmm l O ZUVUUZ fuUUUUu I _. N.BC- ' 1 I --- o _ 1 & N.CZ-L1'LL6-ANI S.K-B0-M-ANI --�.• n Y� 414� • 3g d n PJ"nog uogpnp XP w 1 -��-- S.LZ-6h'OB6-AN! } r m y ak J m N.1Z-YC'OB6-Awco 68 LU Y., 0 Q LU LL 133HS 33S S.YL-Y6 ! p N.YZ-16ZS6=AN- II o g 05'C66- u Si g 1A 6. a :g rn s:; uf' C) W) n t 3 s I fo ? s 5 u ¢ ¢ oS.+Z-t4'SB6-ANi F� QoN.YZ-CY'gB6_ANI AS 9 c CD ^ i tO Z Y< ���� o if 3S.BI-It' -ANI 1.� y �� LLJ X�'� 1 e MN.BI-1C186 AN, so> 78 -Y N N.61-BL'IB6-ANI -'�,�„ �•` ' 'tiS.Y2-SC'LB6-AM M.91-SZ'186=ANI e - _�m mm m O �-{�N.1Z-SCL86-ANI 1 �•_ �_6` > W`s00 F <:� 1L-B4'BB6-ANI gasN.IZ--LL•Be6-ANI c J m �Z Ul.. S.BI-tC'OQ6-Aw u IG, a t'S 2S` ��W c �o ..w• 6'M6- - mBsC, o 41�XI ap,ill S,Il-S6'886-ANt, ..� C$ is�t�• I�u, og�sN n' o- o, Im 6o� m o N G -� +I r 9L 133HS 339 ' "� ^mm ° �, Ch m m m m m rn; spuoj japinog R O 117 0 b Ate" d'� ' ' d pO o o rn rn aG ^RRRR��RR��SiR��R I� o S rn rn rn rn rn' F N 9 ^rc¢I I i l l 11 1 1 1 _ ^' s lcrcrc¢¢li¢rctt¢alc¢¢ `Y p5 �c RR qq t>) In o ooT6x ooa_'�jo o`Faa oox -y O co oa ol o+ s.tZ-Y9'986-ANI 3.12-C9 L95-ANI M,9I-YS'986=ANI M,IZ-"6'. 6-AN' 6K6,218F YLIZ-YB'9B6-ANI =o MN,6C- 1 1 xx xxxx xrxxxr L- C "W 2 I f 13 3] I ' =BB8688 �888232M e8 � 8 3S.6f-SI9L6-ANI n G 3-S1-599@6-ANI a N.81-O6'YB6-AM O.n P, M,YT-OY'BL6-ANI J� 133HS 33S cf� ..W^�`'- ^ I •I 7 3S,6C-Sl'BL6-AMI > Zi NLBI-O6YB8-ANI ' 1;•1 2 F M,1Z-Gi'6L8-ANI n C' 1 N W Y66- 1 •W_y_ -1 Q ,,.,., _ 3,i2-66'095-ANI N m = L ^a C¢N.IT-YT'IB6-ANI `J i in 6 M O, ly_ tL W a - m` !I ga S,IZZ--Y9Y9''989lNi-6-AN: ANI _ S,IZ-G6'9B6-ANI 3„I M_61-OY'696-ANI , M,SI-Z-agon-AYS'BB8-nNIW - �Tt. IJ�I ry N.BI-SI'6B6-ANI Y .-a.• „i0L-H F� 1 J p J > N 71 L. 0 6 ud r � tee= n s.lt-06'BBWANI -MIL91.sl-SI'68G=-OI•'BBB-AAANI G O 82'66- rn r� sAl-DL'166-AW O OL'166-ANI - MN_SI-YL•L66-ANI m 3N.S I-5Y'Y66-ANI Y'1 1= W 2 �nJ > W g G —I w> /per Y MS.Si-l8'666=ANI MN.SI-L8'666-NC 1- D O o o m g o 0 o rn m jj S.B1-0L'166=AH1 M5.51-II'fD01-ANI O 39.91-OL'168-ANI •1 MN_S1-96'CGDI-AW / _ 31yS{-Sti Y86=AW > yl 1 3N,91-W+ODI-AM --- 1=- \91 N - 1 3SGI-58'L66-ANI O ' t MN$l-5E'L66-ANI K u 1'10,3a \ 4 5 S ' It MS.9I-CZ-9D3I-AN: _ ri F3 _ > L l v I 3N.91-O'S001-AW 35.S1-i'G k L K E „ MS.SI-19i666-ANI II a MN.SI-18:866wW1 _ 0 3N.S1-IB'866-AMI 1- - g 39_St-1L10 M1 > T plmg col e n„.. n 9pL- Zp �p MS-SI-C GOI=ANI - n cdi ji N.S I-CSGDOI-_ANI �iF 11 K MS,SI-11'C1911-ANI j f. I MNSI-96'ClHll-ANI y99 in a_�N,St-ll'f001-ANI SS I-99'LIOI-ANI 35.91- M_. LOY001=nNl qq SI-BB21014,Nl > L L- � q i II Sh �� £L 133HS 33S 2B 3,s1-wzlat=AW = -— -Rb_6._ __---- - Si o 8 �5 jai ° ° �r,' = N �r 3ys� It Ocp'N N 0 0 0 0 ol ply. ,3i o, 1 0 o c o o o. ro Co spuog jopnog .A n 0, Inn' ,9 0 0 0 0l N g j S.SI-LO'SI i-ANI = m O �l SL-hRZ01-ANI / N,SI-hZ'LZoIMN •I' -�C¢ L gl N_SL-IZ'ZZ01-Aw MAI-CS'6LOl-ANI J I •rt..Y14L01 > 5.5 t-C6'1Z01-ANI _ _ •^�SZOh K 3.51-QL;610i-ANI N.SI-ZVUOI-ANI3 c EI - ZITM-ANI Z I t' OI. rC• a u L _ 'I N.SI-00'LZOL_nNI MN.IZ-LhB101-ANI �• �+ S.SI-ro'=t-AM 3.QI-WWOL-AN' S91-C6AM ..I-AN F ,�� 3.5 t-9L'6101MN � W O N O N N G W O O O O a W R. �•U e ys�' f`•' 1 \ i 3S.IZ-OO'91 1-w o R O O O li) O In O IM In J `ad - In N N O O O O O 17 N N I L EI S.SI-h0'L1DI-ANI o --•. u ll BJ ♦•� 999LO.-ANI ^I > CD s.Sl-99'9101`ANl CS W `.I '� y -I N.SI-BC'9101-nNl B O In I W - - S � w_?uod W _ - ` Z Lo = O c ��s_ H,Lp-�1jp�� ww(•'.•+ti."W 3.1-SI'910-AM - O' _'•' W M.51-S1,910L-Aw W - Le �i AI N.IZ-6-Z- TIOI-ANI a l - -AN 3.51-66 . TtTW10-3H „ 3.1Z-9L'ZLOI-ANI IT 9L'ZIDI-ANI m/ OB'QIOI-36 S.hZ-ICTI01-ANI / N.SI-9Z'CIOIMNI I»6 ./ a MN.1Z-192IM-ANI sal I � ' � .,.., a-I �•. � � u � ,i :I � S.SI-[t'C IOI-ANI 1 & w o 3�Lz-Iszlol-nw i R $ g f N.QI-QZTIOI-ANIt t I, _ M.LZ-1SZ101-AW- •o t. `� R p fn 1' 35.hL-OOMIO1-ANI 35.hZ-LZ't LOI-ANI ^ �I 0rc 3N.hL-0Ft IOt-AM MS.SL-LSCIOI-AN:: W l'101-�' MN.hZ-L'I IOL-ANI --- --i--- �` W ......�., I .••_ _ 101- rl +i MS.hZ•56'OLOI-AW MN.+Z-56'O101-M' u- il »» > » »»» »> 3N.DC-SWOL01-Aw r l nr ^t t I^^ I 1 rrr 3S.hZ-59010II- n g�goon no��g�1O$mgr8$nmmm M.00-LZ'1101-AN' - oo �lnnnnn�nHn S.SI-LZ'CtOI-AW K-I I ii ¢Ie I¢I Ip I¢I I I I 31Z-LZ'IIOI"m n4 pu 4e m m Cm CK lC .. CK¢ 9:K¢¢ _ 1=� MSAC-,• 101=NI o� �} \ N.91�OVTIDI-ANI I " n 0^ ry [I i <a O «tea a a• • aa• d> • r '9YI'9�I.`�Ics o600'S'I ZSnos oZionn at I" 3S«�«Y« mmmmrm«emree��«� C. o O g1 RnHM �� Y xii:lo mlii I lip �WzPH I xx^ Z�m�uuuu zuuu°iu11, °;Imuuuuau°i°; o In .n o In . n N rv 0 �. 0 0 _ 0 0 GPUOJ Jz)pjnog 0 ol In o _;rj_ -o C4 0 w ul 3: oo,90 M IZ-ZG*WO I-ANI Ia 3.S I > p e d 3kft-90W01-Ahl ci MStl GOVOUS-AM 3N_tZ:ZOZ MO:800:"A"l IZ 'Ri (n 951 .-ANI So NI Lu 5.91-SfiTGOL-ANI u N.%­OZ700I-ANI X U) NLS.*Z-_zoof4m, 25.Iz-"_40o..11 —- �t .- > 3N.9l-6L,LGo,;*N' co QCLODI-AM LLI SL'400I-AN] 3N.91-SZ'6DOl-ANI w _j w MS.1:O'lOW-ANI I Md A.G: &9:5M:-AMI LL 3.S Eg 500_Nr Ul LrT O'Goot-AM K> 73 nd PJ k5F F1 I (Y) —r 5.91 96TM--AN' 0 i51-SOZ4W:-AW '01DI-ANt 61W-AN, tlO c-zo,otoi-A. ci < r MN*H-LO'DtOL-ANl Ni.91:IC -AM 9=-_-3.10 o. 3S IC'LW.WAM z P I- z d C91:WLE-ANI ANI 3., WOO ZWK.0 O L NUI-MLODI-AN' LGt-LG LM-nN, 311.11-El"Llot-Am mST -otol M.91-041001-AW -gr -AN� 3.51-G4'LDOk-A LV9101 ct, C931DI-AMI w M.9 t-96'L001-ANI w I 3M,957001-Am V) 3.91-98*1101-ANI d 5 ......._00*LOI- Nd N.Gl-C9 1101-AN' 0. MS.gt-W010t-AM a OQI-AI41 0, 3.9 91.1001-A 3N.91-0600I-AM 3.S +S_Zto,-A > N.Gj_*S_Zto.-A I U) d US lo'IWI:AN 9T90D A co GI01-ANI dLi M OU-3AIRRi 2 3. 69'+10[-AM tn 6 101- .ce .e. 3N.G k LLV D mAM N 0 99'ato­m I Z-6V9101-Atil .i.l. > r I ­N.G:-­W fl, OI-�-=A'3N�I .Tll ,"d 3.9-1-o-NI d . ..M..........%.... C M.SI-97101-AW - m 35.s119 1 1 ,Aia C.TZ Do E E E E!E E INS:-Lg.,zz t N ao l�ANI 4-,, .211 rl d 6 6 -T.. .... .J..., ,654. 4 Fs 16 d GRR a) 0 t2 -2 o 0 spuod iopinog BL A3HS 33S - ----__ O F o, o, o o W NOZ-YZVEPI-AM w 9td n N.1Z-OTI01-AM 91q t l �2 3.51-86r WI-AM Nod [/; - -4y c 1 LLl W 0 S.IZ-LIPTIDI-AM p•-" In NAZ-L9r101-AM' " W69,61ol-914 S In s.[z-ifirlol-n�6 Y o w $-91-191101-ANI N.9 BY 101-ANI \ (A Y I Yt L MS.BI-6t'9101-AM 6' 1"Y�d 3Nsl-11*9101-nN1 W Y0'9101-AM xi.4 d Igo L 5.91-61'9lDV-ANI r•A1 III2 N.S1-9f'BID-t-ANI ! , I_ c MN.91-W9to NI O Ln '' '9101-ANI'. m O W la S.9I-Y6'6101-ANI _ N.91-96'6101-ANI =I MN.91-f8:6101-ANI > ---_- _ 1 t • `I�• D��w.N~'•1 1 I '3N.9 1-Y6'6101-ANI 1 S.s '6tONI MN.s I-f6-56:6lO1-Al-ANI I®1i ;I - 1 nd J MS.S11--6YZzoI-AN Il V n ,.14-•,. ;O 3N.S Q Z i01 M ---to OCpau r W M. 1-I0'90I-ANI O W MN.91-10'SLD1-ANI M III O I = 9'87AI=3 - _ W108 _ 3S.s1-69'901-ANl-- CL1��: X - 3N.91-59'SLOt-ANI V UWIn i i Igd icy M591-SA'9LD III `-M •� W p O O O U O o 0 In o In G In o Yp •� '�v m4� � a�� I - `�'�I� ti In 0 O V M M O O O O U O 0 "Ad. I� I V O I + MS.SI-15'ZSDI-AM ..:•� R g�.".. N.SI-fS'LiDI-AM " in r'I.fl - 1 \� J�- _ 3N.51-f9'Lf01=ANI a m fin', z a 1 II [O,yy MN.91- l NI N 35.a1-BLZf01-ANl M5.91-YSZL'01-ANt N.5 I-f9Zs01-ANI 9 -.....__._-Hnw _ S.SI-[93TOI-AM MH O„ Wks $ r: SS 1-91VEOI-ANI W 1 MN..S I-2COM1-ANI ' 0 000 -8- 6Rees S«mYry e3�r�„��7� 35.91'r.691COI=ANI pp VWt!'l nann 19i_fnnilmrlNne � [.. Sn22n 2h2+.2!.Z 22n �a:. - Zo22 1 I In O N O In Q I �AA /1 m 2 O OI ., spuod japinog O N O co N ' --- O O O O� Z :I n l Inn 1 1 1p^ 1^ O O O O' O O O' O) (31 H N A.........rc .w N MU; H H oasss as slaLi i`s 11193HS 33S eS�59S7«��15&� ODO-9-S31ooa Y M- 3N.IL-3 AANI • 3N.S1-T.1366 QANI i �nb� U ANSI-K BO01 MM b V� 3S.S1_06'6001-ANI > �' N.YL- I -i�- -- �osw3e tf= ns a 6.YZ-Yf'968wANl J I .K. N.YZ-iC'968wnNl �b¢ J v I 0 -N s.YL-♦0'L66w m k - 3N.91-00'YB6�AN'' - 1..,-� M.SI-CZZZOI�nNi Sl 133HS 33SLLJ O \ r. Q Z N.SI—ZI.AM MSSt-ZOIDMObLOiMM Z spu ri - o,W OI�ANI ♦ 1 ° - � NS.S I-ZO'OZ001.`AM v-.W MN.SI-20'OZOI A i 111 fi0'SZ01� 35_S I-tl'OLOI`�NI o� •'+1 _ I �'\J 3N.9I-YZ'BLOMNI - ¢ LB'YIOI-ANI N.61-LB'8101"Ni 3i51-a7ZLOI-AN1 1 ,L t t , `h. o O Q w.sH n 5 0 _ L' 1 391- , t.�'. Z MS.SI—LB'Y101-AN1 ^ it 5.51-56'B101-AW y 1-. Ir. Y vlvva 1"' •\\ N1-LC'LI$ OI"M d od, o D! CD1 -7 n MS.SI-S41001.+AW � 3N.51-SC'8001�AN1 - •.M d n // •\\ . i W w... I. .I• N O N ill Ms.SI-;*CWDt.AN! a o #� /i•"lW 3N.91 YC'6001-AN. to `y MS.BI-OL•LOOI-AN) `{l'^� 314.51-5L6L1�0�01�=_ANI !. - _ 3NAl-K'ZODI RANI I 3S.IL-"'LODI�ANI N O e l 'I i h\.;..._' el"L001=AM gLg'COD�I�=RANI 3N.YZ-OD I-AN[ CS „ - 4 In -JJ � ysi rM M N NIn C..: O —O rn m t �- : o spuoi jopinog pmA21nog 00, In—. .o-.-_o.-__ o F. _._-.. 00 00- m W W —� I rn - 1 N.IZ-CtYK-NI o � L u 1 6d rr F W � C W O = I � 1 S.1Z-L9'SB6AN yy N.B.-60' : 6B6�ANI u) o N f - p I � 1=131BA08V 33S � U S.BI-6S'9001 1 J N.9I-69'9001"MN1 J amw IKSU la i M 4 O D— L 1 r b 1 � I I n O 1 O I 1 I U O S 6.91-I+0'96li�Nl W 60'9.,NI elool-a o" 2 I- _ 2 w J a U S_BI66' ANl ¢ 1B1--66'-101 WI-RANI OZ01= 1 RR KK¢GCKN � �•... 1 . C (fill ���WW�k _ •o� r(' r n _ « "+6555... 7777 17 I5,81-fiS'9001 RANI N,B M.B I-B9 B:'9lOt-AM d 1LB1-6S'9001�N1 I-BBIOI1 i 3 1H018 M0138 33S ' �G ; co if 0 In o In o - ii it F • O O O $.Bt-DDBI I-ANI 3N.S1-OD'�I IQANI `2 1- I c0 flr W _ Ef ~ � = m i - w 'Ia5 _LU C s , c LU N - 4l 133HS 33S - -- - --- _ ...... ...— \ spuod .dapinog N O In Oi In; O n Z COn m N •_+" _ J2 � O O O O a rn G DI O W j I a9B6++ 2 0. a'a9s cn — Z9'WB EV Om� Z9166 R Q) kW 2 aZ flizdg 0'996+ Z rn �w ��K G u ZI'L86 0 oR' 'I ..^•, 1.1 JrT m�e F E 'L'LB6 N Y J•p � t.'!��' S �R� min Al' � Z9Z88 9'696H Q) G /" N,i•w �� ZIT66 YD' t'I68 opa3� �a m L9 TB6 � `t CI�' � N x I DZ U B6N < Z I'Y66 Q zz�$ovi b W m o F j OZ66 't Y �t�'i � Nei Z9'YB6 r k•. �" 'm ay F3�m oNyCuy�a 9'Z664 Lai VFiw �`w ZI'S66 n bi \ \. L. jw aiL i 79S% tT66p U' _ •` m wm _ ?w 0•f664 F- L a \ �8ZB �$ Rz���"u LI'966 ¢ rcc Z pp2 S 2d�� L9.966LJ g w F 6Sm�Cmuiio�uS FPs'' OY66� c �i ow mO y \. _ ZLL66 C m6 Zyy�('S4 ~ � .t H h ♦ G 9 t66 Z9'166 U 99 ST66 J ZIE66 J J jm zk' . JC 9T86 P "` $m O Z U Fzmamb g� 9/'666 Y086 Yww � a�iu - } LB'666 0�,� - 9i IL to Byes 9@'ODD[ Sa<x CS66 b3 ��2� S�� I z9wol 29I001�n 9,966 ([.r rf ~o Q e '1 29ZOOl (n �mai Oai6 gq �`�' .00 O ZSTO01 Z9T001 aT3 Y986 m Nri+mlri n t 5 N 05M-ame'9B6 IL I N L9'f001 g n n Y O S'C66 W t OL'9001 ✓n o Q LI �. S !A'9001=73 z W In�„Ifi-;- Y• yy L9'9001 a _ � 2 09+L-lAd fags g W OS'LOOL n i aY" 9666. C' 2t1100[ 1 000t U SL'90o1 U m I `�'Ti'r• r 9'00010 1'1001 m+ W w _ LD'OI01 9•IODI Molot 1 00 C to ._�_IT y erg IS'1101 8 m a x IY001 ! 09+6=-d W O'h1 L +m )� 'hoDlo --- oI ie n�m�ii 1} I) _ 1 I Y'90010 5 ! a CB'h 101 " e ti 0@S10, DBBIDI>'p n 3 n 09+01;:=OAd I "' t'LODI+p @f'L I01 n 1 g W o F>1 L 9rolol_ o a xt •': �;'w'er5 2Ja1921q--N I s t x ezw, L9.9t01 L9'9101=13 05+11=1Ad 1'SIOI =�3 0 A \I„1.` LY 11•�' ry 6'9lOto - ' `� L9.6191 Z9'6101=l3 ti 00+ZI=JAd 1 eo^, S9101n _ I WNW NoryVozol u -�m1t.�u•n`um 6 6'IZDIN t'YZOI f 5 .4 f j M'tLAI q BY'IZOt=l3 n a DZZOIo ` o ZLotn �F m uow�.e, 1 nm 07"01 i l u _ -•+c N hB'IZOI o a m OTZOIn OG H'1Z0, 9ZZD1 S •u 7 ✓' aaaAS qa5 scams 2 Li1'izol sD'IZoI�'o I Csi W c j`F is7 00++1-lAd mS <x OZZOI$ 0onkt+� .•i'�W '9SUZOt Tian oZL01 �'ddfS i 1 LO-0L01 1 o Ga= In a IfY a CZZO, o o O m m m 5Z 133HS 33S OZ 133HS 33S N _O o S _ spuod .lapinog M In -t N N Z i" 'e c> 33 s{etol 8 w C 9'YLOI c = Y, 9c'61oI to llzol a N r I Bl'OL01 O'1L01 4-1 99 ozol +a u o i Q n ' e I D'YZ01 Q��.'a ak'��nm m d�•'` `5 i�° - - Y 2 a � 86'OLOI t S o O'YZ01 + I pmn om:.o 9{tLOI A CtZ01 9L'1L01 p<amuc w�ux_, r $Le' _ 9tZL01 L'1Z01 + L �azpn c�H..»3 hL'LLOI��; a'YlAI � CS'zZol R I oa+1 IL 66 193HS 33S [otzol o g rwol « N 1l �.�------ r e e-n o M o•hzol R Q orzol +. ..-�- ' � so•rzol n s "-xf(' L9'fZol 6 was :S oo+z and � ortol h w ci F� 1�; W BI•SZ01 LU D .J�° - W 4 — I'hL01 fn Q mill ' 1 - - WSLOI LU I r _ S o{'9Z01 O{'9601-13 Zn W> a T JF BB'9L01 o Y SL+f-0Ad B'YLOI S W- 32 o_ g g z-Szol fA e - ^V€ Isezol e e 0 S'sL01 LI'M W ° O r• - / 'Y - t:i d x OI 8'sLol j J SL"-lAd S•9Z01 l'LL01 {f'OCOI = SIM IL l lx�h ec` S'BZOI big t lS'Z£oi FS p a s qIn 6'6ZAI m Q £Z2{Ol WG ED B'OCOI f 96£c01 p m Izro1 •_�� l _ L 6'{FOI IL G5[01 e / -�lui •I £1'9COl Q MEW .9 wQ 1'e{01 + W P��{pne w � es'Lrot U 2 L cmol m y 1[arol g -.:W ro•a£al Cl) Z,11001 H--0--` / ° -, ---- 9Carol o•tfol W—' „al ° ar01,01LLI cwn i olvol W talsaWLlad ri 6'Of01 ° m 18'1f01 W Cool Z� W r 4•e Q 99'LY01 99MI-13 ! t m z S' `�\`bi OS+L=OAtl 9'010i y 4 • IC'CYOI O �'••- l I1"•3 O'Hol o 1'' f1wol 4� 1,11,01 = ^ M"ol R `a p 8'OY01 <' � Mld_ la Kfrol b a e I s g k rival "4,• �>�y.1^ . enrol �y 962r01 '�6r`n lnpy - zmot act E e,srol + t3 SbZrot +� /;. �s a r.•arol E` Z'BCOI ZUVI W LZ•aol Lz•OYOI—3 Os+LI-Ind CO Wfirol Mot r C/) 6•[[Ol i sy0Bzro1 i 0 4Z 133HS 33S "Wot F L lro1 ± ` ...OL9OC,6 ..OBUSI..L.4kf. fBiZ"'B9f81i IS-/b fCO'lGfZ3? I fSa'ao 6il Ou Z2C01 lt,'12 w6 O'Oolg Qi -j;i=;L GfZro i r.�, _ 2133HS 33S SS'Ci1 9Z'C9 O_20: 19'6z: p u1 w?- SIx'[.9z SC'ro' I 6C'CS VOW 1 OUGH3 1N3`JNVl.Sninvw I W,9M 11 3A.Yno n o In o. 0 o In 3 OVi 3ANn3 c o 0 0 0 In 0 cv 0. �i, Gpuo,l jopinog "b­ 0— 6- 0 o 0: 0 OD Z C\j w w OZ 133HS BgS 2: — cn (\j olzol solvol S swok A IFZ 193HS 33S VIM O'"Ol W4 I'ml .4 C-4 69"Mi rTml w t*spot w C 1,9co, co GUM ui HIM r--w V) Mool L_ MIMI 1*14-ol Lu To'B[ol w E,t+ol m 9L,aco :310: Witol 8 Witot lvtol gg-z*ol GRIM-13 D9+6--OAd 9*D*Dl Wiwi Cmul o M oo C) Ecttol In w M gr"DI 6 atol iq Mot :t C() ol mctol 3! 9'smi -L4 Go-4tol zwol 0 U) IntoL 8 w M revol r- kC'I+OL 0 z Lcot z (L IM"I LZ 0*01-13 8 z-9col z OG+!i-iAd w L'Ml zo,Kol 6-mol + selcol 87co, E Wovol om t .. ........ Gr7rol D-ozol LZIVOL-'13 ItIrol 2-g W os--f.-JAd— CUM + 91TEDI + Bo'saol olzol f'szol ",ozo: *O'LZOI-13 09-St-IM wtzot LU so 9zol w vlzoi LU, Lo gzal LLI o"+zot 5—tt,Street LU Go�M U) LU ZIEDL Go U) &0 cza. Eol, swot + oizzol gWol ZI'LZDI VIEW_m d Vvzot + tz atol Vtzol O'stol s g olzol Welot Vrzo. OG+Rl-�Ad 9tslul 5=L telto, 0 aqltot mm WIWI Ix Z_ tn 0 Co lo o a o ll� It V r) tq M N o spuod .jopino(@ Y _ 64133HS 33S nI o� n —__ ---o---- - a F o 0 0 e o ZLL t`i . W z ozzot Pad` W st'ozot 6 $ 0 = a= ` \•J.• -,' ----�W oo*mt - B9'ozol-� ><c 9'zzot OL+O-JAd � OZZ01 3 "MI Cy i '� nS 9S'OLOt `w 5 c Y I VIM tr) N li q a 5� 9•otot f6 ��"i s ' N t CI'Ozol :s a _ LZUZ01='f3 w ap g g to DL+l-iAd rizol O a 9 iX9°iq� \ —_---� ♦Z'6wl lTzol L O _ ♦ _ N rvzol to �'t91+♦ f' 4 4 W Q Q —_ — --j wU m m WNW Nam . ���*': f —� W SDVMl 05to1 o w U w L W ;ice• ' IJ O 0 h'SLOt m W W �s 6zEMc cezol `, r 701 o1 tzol g - " r � oB'Iwl oe'tzot raxol i t� U r 9i O'9Z01 + J a r a f j B1zzo1 W J G 6'•- - SYLUI ,+•, BOTzol i Y ff •N 11 19Tx01 n i ' Z9'C7AI-13 IL IA d r-- �' fec I zo-nol;Px O'YLOt - ti z SB'1Lo1 N o'Yzol + m wszol s/zoi VOW + <y. Co w 5f'LLoI I^6<Y S Z ['rzol ± W j Gi'.:'w�.,lP' '^ , �. -_._- - I— r• Grozol a n I 6VZ01=l Ad egtpne W [a _ a COW o U p 91.6LolMEJ ru) S 19'BLO i i/ ,r •J '_._-�• '� _cam �?X"' t'4Lol woi 66 Taw Lu NIL \, r' °/I - _, BC 0001 N`i- o N w—w, aal F. i 3 Ls•lrol a>1 I re't[o1-Tf We W alro�sal992d - °� •> BB'L[01 +n a Sh+L-3Ad Wl "------ �l r e�i r� 9'lrol �I , O/ a zsrcol , ,H? 8 = > _. j JI i O rrlrol a Y s ... �r �^ � � a s o9'h[ol u tzrol _ y[N m 6L'6[ol ce srol OZ 133HS 133S� O L'9rD1 LL g lZ 133HS 33S sf�col owol ; oo•9rot m 7 � z•firol - r Co 3 }' } � 8l'hLOI os � ^J � !. rr____ Q) S♦� Z'1Z111 a+ #F 01 rr a° rzTZ0l �_ ;fie rhzol 3 { } N c lrzzol W g g o" Twol is o s Le mot a,J N p) 6z,oLol-72 BTLDI O _ I `\`, � C 6L•9L9t _ ' e J w GI oo+l=-d zvcok _ .v IS W a6wl R �-----� � i ; uJ 3 69•Bwl � N I '�tx _ __ - J W I- 91-BI01 CGS y Y. cc w �f w Co 1B tw1 a lezwl-ta S C LL w�---• f --' - =II w+L i/id L'LLDI H O v w_ , B'tzol t W �01 spuod ,apinog o o, -- to e t - 3 /* N fl 1 ,C J L C'BCOI n ai l9'1hOl � VOW � 1 •' ur a`* `l�-_ - BY ZY01 EL N = - L9ZY01 ,fly, c U {C' C Ru L5 Z Z'6Col n C CLCOI 4 c a 6hTY01 $ � 2 \ _ z V I J-1-1 01 a+9 lAd 'o D 7IS :4'CL01 {1 pp = ZL'H01 *9"01-l3 z Z u n - 9'4rol n OtrS-'Ad 6'9[01 1 61'ri0t AN Z-scot fi Ct OBF10l 6'Brol U 0-ttol 1 ` fCCtOt IL'C101-17 IZYOI 're,--W._�6y/yh. .\ ------ i O ro'F101 o .o 51+4-LAd I $ z arkwaXi nv~4I� O O O o 59'L401 �>° , I., O VIM = Blarol nut 1 /lYnp •o t ��co W [93H0I 61•1401 W 1401-131 W Lrorol 'o BB'DIOt ,1- +SI+[-yld SI+C-.LAd $ Ef) L'LZOI I 98C01 133133S uezol �$24'. y m srot9l Cf'6L01-AM NO ; _ O'CL01 I 1 I n c 9-Lrol c9'w+0- vis Na Warm ° x g + m [6'9L01-AM Nd 0L•9L01 � 5 < ['Lt9l n � L979+0- VIS Ad 6'9L01 S6'Lt01 >n z4'L[01+T3 O $ 9'9C01 4Z9Z01 $ 59wol m u 91+Z-m1d 8 W l'LZ01 + O'9rot N BL'LL01 MGM ±g $ `y' rtzol 1 , n O•�1 Z 1HJ18 33S rcLzol WK01 >". 8 $ z S•LZol S t y O.9C01 ± IL `� .`� • 98'9LOl SL•YL01 1 n _I ll'4ro1 z•scol ,fir a� o ..\ . O j 9zzo1 -'Ci U `•\� 6C'OZ01-13 $ t6'CS01 51+I-OAd twol g 99'C[OI -4STC01 CB'Szol o D ts•[col IQj 9'9Z01 n L6'0001-A35—Ad", iqm g N w 5 x£B'SL01 61"Cro1 vis Nd ^Cr}• cc S'9LOl LU }u a 10'9zot 10'BL01-l3 $ SOYC01 $ W SZ.OZOI00+C-.LAd L•9L01 n S'0001 +e __ y O'9LOl v` .Y M] ,^�`�<•.�; In � M 95'9L01 09'9L01-T{ $ G O O O W o" 0'9LO1 o n 9L'9ZOl OSK-'JAd j i 1 qr III.+Y�mn �1 Y'Sz01 i kle I ; 6 1 1 , 1 1 I n 6L'9z010 $ .. a o:s < I I'tzol ¢ Q z O: n 9C9L01 1 �CIM-'n o �'���m`�`.�"x• '�_-- 5 � � e 09+ -.LAd 9'FLOt Y W'l. 8 S a 19•SLOI $ 9'LZOt O i \ _ CL'SL01 Iizol »w gild n 1 n•N (' 9BYZ01 9B'4201-73 _ U--- °'. t •y �j i$ OS+S-OAd 0 Fri1W1 O L ILQI $ I I F Z alrin R1.H a w } 9t.tzol I Z 6,5101 6WK01 I fi9'4z01 $"`n`n D OS+9-JAd c'BtOI.bmlllt�u io 98'IL01 W c- a u 11RCC ZOZ01, C ucs=eNw °a' �i't� - •'\ U LZ'SZ01 � � �x n _' _ 95szol Wal71 o°pi.1 6 F - H ; C'i i�. '� � 4 i a l•L'L6l 4 a (.:O�._to I -1 o�- _ W °✓lr u '[zol � Jim vuol $ v f�� Crozol i v I ylJ -l!6R 9LL01 ++ D byx o N C. spuod .lap�nog In N a Z dl. ^ zcltol r�� -�------- IL6c'Ool 1'nDl a^" 6'ri01 •q►U MGM l _ 4 w3 9.9101 {L J 9L'OSDI ,z6,1-T3 $ _ OS Z6+i=lAd ?? 6'LYOI O N O OS L'9f01 R .1.1 Izzsol 1() p W N ms+ern 60 ocwl +' �J r E oczsol 8 WNW It It n� T6+o1 U W YL 99ZSOl L7 N N O Y aW Q� u4a�a L•�1 7 (n O 9l'LSOI =x n F tl l5'OSo1-8 WoRol [n r_ z os'Lo+c*md D•0901 I+„ 999iD1 LZ133HS 33S 0) Wool =' 1 09+1-LAd 9.9fo1 el R/01 .11 - g s'ri01 ± J : trriol a 2<y J I x n a i ve" a a t - 91'1101 _i 91+401=l3 <�o O YCI01�. L9'tY01 os+D end � O I�V �I h i �x� - 9rsw1 '•. 8 � cml to OLn N O pis-�ih si, I- _ « - m CS E�a a i_aiP m ly O 11 o O O O O L9'OZOI o 0 I G•. -~< -- 00'OZDI L•Oz01 Z O oi_:1 - - - -- V61o1+ w jLlu;� 9S'610, J L'LIOI V Z1'61DI p SIZ_L33HS 336 Rs Rlo, C•9lol t sc'R101 i L'9I01 N�. 1 i Fw r 7 tc'uol rclD1 W:•.flu i ,co-b1 m we YLI01 8 b es[oIle P a I- t9.91o1 Cl) l�Su �•�>, --_ 9s_i `•,'.'o asz r-.^=--ot _-fir _ W 6'1lDl W W OS'9101 W ,� '['p11110 .•Ye< c-� _ - S'IIOI+, pt/ 'wr - r _.. ..�'+ 90'9101 - 9D'9101-13 - �!1� �' W y W 99•slDl irm IX J y n En m tie8 B tc'slot 1 ,�g solul a �79vD1 m 91+C-!Ad 9Z101 < 8 '2'�r'.'i• O� r O 9 12101 9'hlol ,+. A L'OIOI co tvwl+ IC'1101 `Ji, ♦!` >y 1` �• - 951101-'p swat I,+I [� O _- oz'tlol OI+S DAd Gtoot Os1lo1 o i+e._ DVm t9'1101 Ci 59001* 9Z's101 OS+a+9=W 99001+ D., VL. zz No 'n3 i I (o'p1 O'1101 M1 `O mpi's E�118i Qj/wc�i� 8 C-4, O' Gpuoj jorinog 0 cli C4, pi UJI LU T 9-9901 1 G"Zct 66 1ZOk Vtzol rVot N -ra- zZol y ZvZol LLJ a) II W t6,gzoi pkl L W mol W. Lu VDCOI (1) DV 9ZOI Ln rem 96 SZO. I'VZO, CS 0, W CZ qzo. LU pp 3: d 5,9ZOI In Gs Vtzot CLEW QZ'*ZOL Tizat .6 TZ01 0 CZOL O.Lzol 9C,Ezot Q'WOI V6 LZOL jVQZO L V Mot C gzzzol CTWI L'I'Zol C14 r'O :3 LTZDI + uj tZ'LZOI WLEM=13 CD W • ISWO. ' -modto_ ; I 09 +S- S-Lzol S, I I I WO'ZZOI 10 *Vozu,.0) Wozol 0,92:0 1 z JAYn 16,6101 I z �uj 6CBICI"P WSZO, W .13 ora+L-iAd ITZ01 LU OTED, 02 4 LU It owl U) Vzzol SEIM 7Vzo,AY Fszol 0 CUM LIM 6,$,Zcl I K-VLOL-13 L'*ZO. ........ LEVID1 LO'Blot 99 *TEO[ 01 DTZOI LTZ01 + LLU tO*4101 5! OIL9401 ZTZOI OD 04*91OL Chi ST,91OL CD r LU TOM 0 ui go"91131 WWI Lu.. WSW LLJ U) vil'tiot 9,giol Is*$-101 PH U—i 07., iz-- '9101 so-clot 0 9LOj 99vot 11'rio.-13 0,9101 + ?j QW, 4. Lni 0 In0) L spuod .japinog VZ133HS 33S O n o In! o o 0 0 of o o' o; ..I m srswl ^I. ^' I8 wIn � € j % I I O\Vltl ^ O e C6awl ' 1 C'G'L01 'l 9LBwl m L'9Z01 ' Q 09BIOt N HBIOI - OSZf+6--OA d 96'nYZOott 6[Bt01_13 L'YZDI ( W LDBILr) LLaOI W L' 01 gg++ Q) 99'1 to 1 p P H a 1u (A rQ'.• ._"\ w>Y P 't Y:,.ee.,. .oAs:`u ne.,Do' .a.i W _� . ll'Lwl•_T3 LZZ01 c •1-0 to-LIOI - OS'L9+D1 lAd ZZmL OL"9101 e \ 9'OZot N 909wgt�wl \ U 9'9wt wilot ry taal t� z ? rL'9Lo1 F Z'LIDI Isrwl J 0.9101 �'a Fary'I •sn 4 v -7 r OZ-i l0t $ l(1 0.9w1 fj nk W WTIOl_M I O'9101 L 0. os•tL+c1-ytd 0'910I � ZO'C I01 W � ^a /`f `, 1 m .A O'9wi t W I I f - 69210t .4 (n +`4 r•i n 11 I I 96Z101 Oi u'i v'�aY I � c 5 09w1 6l'[I01 J J $ W 1 O y 1'9101 1 L 9YT101 OG'[I01_13' - Q - l o �a -'.d - - Z - �- [9'[tDt DGBZ+51-LAd-lA t'9LDI p �._' Ir r-� ilk 9'9101 LI _ z O< J .Ln 99tot U t1 0Z 9'9w1 m In 96'Y101 69101 Wgtol i 195101<b 6'L101 i i I LD•9101 O9Z9+81_DAt W - W 7sa/yl uelpa -'4 4', rc'91D1 Y Y 'n b •. *04101 W �Ce '.}�,.� '93A'7.LL70, 1• 1 5 1. Z9Z01 W�-�r- d svc'r.s:.` Z['CLOI as $ ...... i 6{�IY° - 1 D9'G101_V• Swat m Mn 99•Gt01 - - z " 09'LI+9I_Ud O'Lzot ^ $$ C9'4tOL x ! s 3 t 90.9101 91BIDt_�3 m Y r _ •I - ozzol ' [[9lOt 0929+91 K)Ad 1OZmI + E, I ��'� w91oI SR ^ o'� IZZOL CO CO 9 i r^y i 1 C I I Z89101 I y Y ry o ug 1. QI a> rzmt Yi 4 I F st'ewl g w 1 x I MCI w ;: a9'ZZ01 o•not \ - scosD I � grim re'/sot Epp. / z o[ 3j L 0$�ttj QJ W el �k M 1) N N spuod jopinog ---1n Z u1 ai a 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o� n N ; r Lu 133193S s � N s. CL CL w�------j - 3�. - - r 7 zW l!l /// �1 r xq — °! - _ _, t rotzolLij rolzol-roS W f ... ` I a.55 4 0 `/ Go Izol g R CS'SZoI ��s�d Y O \•� CC; 9r'9Zo1 a li n s I 31001W 33S - w+I-ind 8 w N i Ln J ;;ec rv. I1 Li n I'I J ~ 8Z 193HS 33S md�w g o;s�.: �L is Lxol g N wim cI ^Ip Rio ` ol'[x01 U�cI' n.�•�ia!> -{ t � 1 O O6'8Z01 o + eo•axol i m ••;-;' - }�C a• �ik ^G 14'9x01 G<Y o F g �1 S O oml� " z� I;5 `n xoi+�l:lAd K. c II1 �- _ ersaot _ (D j � wf'p'�^ �t hl 0. j Br'SZOI'3 SZ+I-]Ad W E fI 1 L. IC'rx01 N n°'s Ri,n U ulu u u u!�lul�vl �ueu u 1 tK'SLOt I I B I - yy = OYSZ01 rn s�'i Y I g W {{i!+ ) S8•Szot J a Go.�73 2 , 7 au O SZ+Z lAd (1 be ep- 8Z 133HS 33S LL J LCZC01 91ZC01=T3 �� 1 5th Street � 1/rocol I o + L6-8z01 h iy a o - G ZB'9zo1 .5 rl vzot RZ 133HS 33S > = i g LzolCozol e Yf L t - Lo-ozol /f� en erszol - Kwol ortzol I .C•t FY H:g 11 i ��i 6 4 L 'I F,> I pp VIE Golzol 0 f:-���s7�•/� \ lolxol �-"a io,lzol--u +x-JAnd g ` !? m ea os+z Moto R+0 S I -ed W (n <{ "•ems 16 inuo1 w �cY o ! '.• '�.�1.. � ',�I - )• � ID'tZ01 10'K01-13 + Z•� to•ozol 0 0 o I g �L'•t A ti\V s ��o / . ✓a „ 0971pt d" 8 i o 7e�i M 8o'8to16'p O5zi �S• `J 9 ac %Z.D d wG;1t •,��\ $} � .•off'; ;;/ as•uo' - o d o Ol In o vI 0 N O: w `�� / {/• / 1,; �a` �_..� o' moo' o 0 0 0." spun j .12pinog O IN O d) Ol u)i O In z O Ln O O O W o✓L+01 N 9Z'L+DI MMI-13 + L 9Z'G+DI , 6f 6f+91-IAd 9 is WOW � '++Wstol 8 j 45 �4x e6'OSot I •ass< + y •B6'IS01.T3 J d n + dl i_ J R fY'fSOt +CI-7Ad - ILI ` SYYSoI-13 zolcol St+LI-!Ad �� L L9'LSOI ` zo'6901 W69ol .-n I u tlp �,.---.--..._..-•—�r�..."--iy- __._:-/,!•� ` WNW $1491 =�tl R f O �Fy n Imo+ 1 Lu l \ 11 "-- `_1sL:32-Ri / zvoaDl z+•osol-l38 00+St-3Ad I A C 9l'6501-13 ,\ \• J 09+fl-oAd J i9'99ot Ql e 1. zt'Lsol=T3 n_` nO a 06'9Sol (� i F tr O,\ •`` •� LZ�ml O _ 1 ✓ TI Lu ILI a6loot. g < E . -In z Ooz'+Cot 5 d x z y + W ro'fsol ` - v Ln s9zsot $ + 99+01-DAd — (I w lsot JL [aE- _ I I a r BI'D501 Of+OI-3Ad erwm 6s•tfol GG i Iy € r^ 09•++01 s is <' 21, f9'Ztol � N' oo+z-w g o + a, _� l 0 :i F �� •I ECEM F N R f lo po L9'9rol i 1)gyli ! z o'1'0 ! 1 [s'9eo1 g , -__-- I �1 MGM R s + -•I it it o Gig!. p t r o R�R iq Cf'Zrol 9CZf01 LZ 133HS 33S t3 N a o�` o -' uL+S ny d $ C e s +f•lrol 6.D vI�oI+ ts'6zol zW , n d �IjW iT��i 118LO` LZ 133HS 33S � ' S �! �sas O 1 O O' O O spuod .lapinog 0 � s a 0 is Za0' jO ° W., FD ^: - W �� 4gezdaiaTti'�'�o`zo' SN F 3Ra = - $ FW- `gz 1zk �o3q dw 6i i alus o� LEA Z, s oW ��< -age- m ya € _ ha " (5`Co'�owgq g� 3 IS- 3 �mBlb�a�2 `•��ebi�° � ab $uu� 8$w�muFl haz�z.�- � iox F� {—Wa $,�ozm (� LFS ;i' F ;a o 7R„'$,�m (n R��.s.p— W �s o�� i$ azdi osW k•ma� �+ gg"F stII-"m� �B! LI E aw# kzpi55t5z ootl<<t+lZo�"Z �dz`oc a-{{$ ^z$m 'am azazS�$ G y� 22QI_ �w R O i %4 <�F� yOz �mm ¢YSG �� ZV Gg�AO o3<�ii 2222ty$ �o sgo��m<z` � bs le'InIaz¢<Hul o tl-80133HS 33S t 'rrf ! I I I J M B s ea RHO It o $ � R'g � Eiz$ � oz'o°3<.�&aorc .` II 1 i'I fL 6 o gmg=aa�a o � ego°s \ t M I I = ; I M ' g�es=o�e; a It r I iy ° ii'Wml,.bkg�><zquai $k'ulz.I - 1 r I 11 ozin$ �_•'ny�m $a� Ewa I.�"ti u t ouzo �� s3FF'�zog�o,F�q�r3�8bQ� g I ` � 1 1 i � ��asozzzWm��a�T�d3iilz.,i�swcFiac�<�ya�'ytze t i i�'n �,I 1 i ' j 'I II I I F$vaw k' �`qo< a �c'oo7�•°u€6NE,o �z•`••15 1'� ` .I.m }I 1 I43i I - LU MET, � $a m$gFim ego 4 NCyu igy d `""' b12zwgtz= 9;1 z�oz zdzym zd a'J' ��" oo-eBE W 7E Sao<��a .ar wee: a wcii�zg���zgs Su�F' �S`s��i$Wo$�mW m\Qg °Sos'g C i Fs$s `Ir` U°#N3g � #^� �b<' b" �''t!'i'-<uc�n:6Yua �.•I �, 1 I I ru .. l "a�z�o�6k'�`r'#�ii��<�$<n��'�cR""� jf MRSW's o'wd k3�3'g €�ffuF+n s.`n a'�uGzi u;,`<u°i �' °I °�$p�•se8FR d SR �o� §,7$� \ I F m I k. I I I I I t 13 y�i�l�' �0'oz� j'..�i\ M �1 I t3wond ��k^zZ #uo-P-D I{ � I:• ( I I I 1 �..."ti;_ e to t t � .. f¢¢Jy^> 2OR¢O k29- s�b�2PIyR =pz� $ \ � 'yam � !} 11 1 I � � z Ul azp8'JF'zw<rc�$ o�ot><E lz�� � �+i��a ;`~.,', I �I �m I _, •1`'.� � � ' I �� �i wzzcm�o<zwp{z<mE��ow ¢nd oEzd t li Ipo 1 t•1 1 •. l t - z� ggmty� ppm�bu o {Ew �d k'L".o K' - $3z Gfi 2rk Uo ��"' _ Go om wwm �z ��suaioo <a zm � ¢ $psj45 hoScuy�n��11`_�z,o a Imo- I I I I 'i \ Obi c� tl� w �25�0 2 L'•< PI KF �`mm $ oi11 S"✓'ii��ZYYii��224 I n b BF tF Nz �g`^N�g a� Z�sYzWPLao�9�J3a$o ' �k���`sk'?mbiL��.i,i��Q�<g�l<,�a bad Q<Uiw O�j<N�W Za04a ZOIZ<�� Z�� ` I _?4: I ` ~�• -;� -,� `�� ~Z$saM �ioiioPu2Pi � Wao� b3'NI" y�_ ___rNni` - I t - ✓CG. ,`�` i I LLJ aui� g gazes<�°zw� `�� �"d z^#aw9gogE ` Fv: LLJZ �$ W ow�Wz zb �$ " ZSWLs m bm� c ❑aam<'T�` 5 t C o��_� a Fay_=Wa @g bW n i o Ubw" b %.1i , Fa 7F' r Ue 2�d;<OwN 4 DmiFtw Z gia�$, wpm rs��1qquz ZZu Lie < Swas'> <?rrLLO gg O� � #�„�wi"uiuO �amaa°Szz�E"ago o �� L¢ a-bab���IN�LL�<z� air �boo �w� iBoS`sogb$aaiBR �a�`zBm��aF Y_ OL--- — - `� spuod iapinog _-- __= --_- -=-- - -- _ ---- ---- _ - PJcAalnop uospnN C - U /1' i��,��.y �. - I`�r —•._.r V \ � J' Il��Il B ! t 1 C I � I e I W t—I G, - _ o°°I � J IL I 4 i � 1 •i�' — !I is ` �; r /`- - t' - - I�; F � � 5 �S t 1' a i� 1 1 i. i I�. -''_O'•4 ° l � S'Z Mf I �- ——slot- i ml^� '1-• N -�1!+ -� - 6 I co. _ i ��-. � 1 —� 1 1 s' -I,�Y1 ;!�.� ��z( �' • it :l7 �' 7f �t _ e,n,�._- ,'1 I _ �t_ _1- �.�-xi*e.=�2v- --. -�` - I =� ,�• „' . .�� 11 '1 i I J � '� v� •4f' otf f �47ed'Qfi,�a-•zr�Qa1K- _ ! �"`��`.4: •-'�I" -`�... `.--�'li�� s �\ 01 Ii t�IfIII I; �� I Ey � ♦ chi' �- -_�, �aa;� 1 •�� t JJ 5,.,` SL��+ aim€! £-aJ 133HS 33S ' spuod jorpog _ y > V P I oA1 /. 1 1 l l r , s'- -�1 a�.°�� 1E✓,- /r pr;�j 3 a �1 t � �L — act O i 3 v a. (Rs - yr•.L a> $B m Lu 39 — ��_� /`t � / � r rf9 - t r - tax � ,�> ,.� I l{�1�• , C7 0 W w If D 1E0 j 4 ) _ 3 h 3 �1ap A W -r Y •L x0. i�__ T O''- 1016 Ad' ui - '� LWLJ CD � �t t �.•,- �k1aY � r � /' to 1 -- / ' Ja CD �, e� n. ,.a ^` �. ,�/- Vim • aYl �_ - 3 A 1 - p �\ m� RE�1014.0 S •✓/I .v /`#m It o v— •+. 'a• •L � � � � Cx{ 1t114 . 0 ta awx x _— tsoll .� - _-=d6,' _ •.�- .too}-- ��'^>+x:. n,- -__ nCr 4 �——l1�'-t.�ie ^� .�'8•.3""r-�.;-i 4L. spuod jorInog i _-�',\ I tea, _ �"•' �. . ��- '.,fib � +,,� u • ;,, ,, ul Via. LU tu cn I of t / l� 1 / i ;L I•- -$�f i ' �'_j.Y r W CAL W LLI Ys ZZ7AY,��r U It .s •f Ir g r �3 lr.e �I i tl .n' 1��Ia.1 CT If 1 11 _ _ IIWnn 1 i , 1 ylir I r 1 e S- J��/ , 16 %i �' 1 S ` 1 ''ti,,�,�'• F `�'",y�+ € a 3 r 1 S iA pi I OD 28 f - ,• �.� �� �! 'I ','I '''' I/�\� - 1 ,,01e K-' '�t Ali Rf- lolglv ou /ffF r aw. __ P Rix_ X ' l-8J 133HS 33S ` A �; spued .�ap�nog _ g a Z 0 w Lu to 7c _-----`-..--.— - -- 1n u, 0 z Q s�z z b' CS$ -.+`t-� ��'� - \�,�1\t t��R-z-,• ?Jell wg uosvnu O x _ wi LU Fo 6 :: fir 1J t $ ci-'yr _._:'.'_-'ir�Ts J:.. . 5 <e ` t C azag gnu gg<g t t- 1 C 0 Q. En cn wa 0O•� ` oHm ARP LL IL HMV + \ \C - o �� F1 Al mmmW eN1�� 1Q1�� '.:yO ii�/// _ `�� / ` ✓! Y" { `�l�[H\ ��� �1 I �� '� a a � czwi v=?5012s °- �r _�---�; vie� st�jiZ,' ►i `_,j,r t' i \ t ��pp. xwa`�axo ovwi A' , s '� �gd �s�,�_�-a-•�--�=„a_ : .fl � � 21 ��r Of .7 :• tea J �+' /t .. .�;u��t•,. �\..�. � \\ l ttt' �:-:'B1-a.�� � .. �� ��yrr l 11/�.,. i _ t.. �J p.i i t �d� "�o- 3mj � = pea 4 Z-03133HS 33S ,b ,� spuod .lapjnog F W 2 . . .::' LU ILEL = U7 V. uj LU LU --`2r}- T I{ 4' �::1"�-���1i' '• '. ;� �i.�� .� ."-�-�.1 t•• $1 / -�_ U IL' r ..f - W Aii Cw 2 IL IN lu w Viz. - .^ate_ W spuod .jopinog d , z J w [ w ir. (rp �} LLJ ke i�• � v� `� .�\\\ In �•�` En 74 IL N LU ui CO Lu �? N' � .x '� z I� ui - ..� •.� ;, I -I ��t=.• la vie i - - - ig i _ i{ ! I � - �'ti'��c: Lim /' 1 -� -% l--,..-• it 5th Street v ` b-03133HS 39S -� ♦� spuod .iapinog £-03133HS 33S o a \\ 1 1 p ? \ \ \ � . \ N. .• : \ :✓ y i NN \ CL 'l t \ \� 'N. AN M.� Lo x N, . t M IL IN = A NAi w / y ! \� z W r z Lu Al tj �I- OZ ! r�\ T \''� Z IN \ �' '� \ +t t� •:�. .. :.- i• via l f t• t \ - \ L •\ r' tl _ a ! Y (n of k � '• l�,r'-, -. ti W xi LL a O Q kk O e`e W cn w e Y z LU o ' rY�s3 � 'ag o N o m � o l9i - a o z ,— • V T. t V n _ • x v-•�V n �•�-,f � �-1F�y ES c 5 ,� - � .m-.�.� � b ;�"s•"s�sH 1r�£s6u�� _ C'4. ^—. _N �v•7.. �YY YSYiY iki Pwwopp XV Bp:tl♦l0i/eI/9 W'11[Y IBLI%3\•w.un(\6no\.^�\�Mr�-a�\•b��+`.�a-Is\uas.e-s\srlaz�\���o\T3.\�a c9 W cn < Oz U U [ F� ZZ JZi X J WO_1 Lj _ z Ewaa�F O aoa¢ in z Qm 0 w Z Q w a ws¢ _ — --__. U z Z y ZjU O U J- N Wir m.Ui O La W C w CN to � f I M 3 W M w z f S I w ° `5 x a Q I I W z w w a � I �•� I a z W c w N w W w ¢ _' N z 3 w CL o a m w a a o = (if U O U cn a o o A ❑ - y �e L OID o € ` Lj Nl :� • - _ �O� �J I c� C o a CD ny �Z vwi 1 e I Ncn z __ Jo 0 IL I a � t �A V o �aa O PO O z a Cll _ o � - N • s; J O (� ) w CO �3 LLI z w m / - < z -�8 ;^} - 1 W LL i gtl J 1 rig C _O D Gr C 10 / a i i �J 0 i fr �mo�m < F V_ u '< Nc-J ..�' u� s ` 8 IL a ® z z 5 �. a Y' o 11, ImT-5 ILL � W LU ---� z _ o a w C) _ a . W z< �09 z I a � a r• se Z W n� mz e d W � El _<c�a'y y"z 5'a6 z. i� a E�l77 t� W J a �. z F o w Q 5 w W �0 0a WW Y WZ J c R_ ya w ' U LLi 8 zFill a� N wswaa o gt m�W = Q i 883�. o\ � o - 0 ,. o e 0 _ - S G _ L �u I J 1 o ytp zm p os wm� a s POP 9 p� ZZ 'do wmN Sa ;'lam so ' _ - _ � 1 = _. Mr- vie _ _ - Q im a x� j C(7 I°� o °� ap �� rI I wa wan�i o 7__r- .. w`TU�g �U t aN�am ao NwW=��sa i J =�oFp�o w CO H izz zmi�� I.'I- W Z i l - O .. F N €ne'mi Ll LLI ow Ua _ _ 71 17 arc C j _ AD 1-' ��/ �✓ -� -�-- 'r�_�_ -fie - li L Y. 1c � I wuI8. w F yz z uxia Wow Qzo O z �W3 >a� v°i ��o a: Oa � UH _22> RZ �WP,= OUw O¢0 3 x a `-r_2 2� �� 0�8 O O m�R WW FgO OZF U ¢ °'w m¢5 os o�oo o N n wz4ww ua rcrcx� � 0 3 aw < m�j w i°- m� Won Z og G pa�tnn ❑ m �m�owN ZVo m 6MOT t Q oo o z LL! gw N owwa xz¢ gsoG �o 'uai ���G' '^ a?fi ��Q`• o wN 000n Su w� ° -w a 0 - O s u mo w 89 RE mn o 1 5 7❑m Itz WJvi x OFF a ;3 �i z¢� n Zzn mo JQ -�+ S x4 r..¢ ow z a,n Op VQ ~ ro�u nN .wvawi go o -„� a z zr. �S zz o�oaa�go zaorwnw 3� x� mops +� >ww r3zcai� 5�m NQ a Z o�oSdoe wmw ¢aonQ=�m?'Gw . wpzmrc �n¢fi?uw osa� 3�upox �oom� az�u.�o w�F�zagG N�p'nrc'GNx S$a W. aNz or'�'.¢a��� a¢sx�m vsin Gm� a`r•'ci a i Smwa ��� 'us3._. u� aJ ov<w $ -T moo�o wF f o�rc�3mz` °=MMo¢w�G — — -- Y Woa.wmoow<o �I"����<�m: s w O w' CO wZ o � = I J W. WaOM - 0Z�¢O 3¢"oi�� �ooa¢do» NIN N O �22 RUU w OG �2 U ggo�i za-c - o , S3 o� �O --I, W z.au 4 zpdw H o oa - g o o g �aazm gza �Gu�N N >Gw o o 'x 0 nN 'w sw � o _ .: 51 xgo _ wW pQ ; W< t z z �a8za =1wTI �i i'�! f J. �I °••1 !� Ic r.h F,�r� rc�e•IF fI6: 16.::C I^I .�.1 .Ic. t 1 .�._.. 1 - � �:I; �i �+ i uj - i 1 > _ ❑ ' [ i6 ell J Zz V tYi l- N a S w g a w Q Z 0 O� w W Z Y Z J � LU: �eade 2 �\N Qc O B� s� PARKWAY a R 0 o a z3 u z�iwv+.htl 91-�>:02/OC/6 bwo'nC>IBZ IX3\xluvuid\6wp\pp:\�u'Jbl\sfiu�.n.C-IS\,ub rcaC�6\[6�6E i\�lJx3\3\>d\_ ; ! E , ) �■ e Me LU / b/ j ca / \ � § ) ! e "§ § �� LU \\ §) � � ` \ ƒ \ $ §■ . m ) 0 § § | ■ ,E §3 | , .�. §§ ( _ n � � ) k � 2 2 § , b< \§ � \k I/. z I`� \ \ kv- k\ $ � isrim zf W \ ! J�X LO \\ - wil- \/�, ` 7p _ r» \ §) + ■I ) �� � )m■ >\ ��; I | ) | I , /) [ J R 0 m ro m 1 o In W rn rn rn rn rn rn m "H q ....... _ lC'986^y A+I COM CON CE BL'9B6^ 0 I B'pP6 d ' I g I I I I tl 91'LB6 W z'L96 Z trigG YF i"LPG P. MIPS W I O O ¢ 2 CLPfi Y ^ V W6 G. - �� Fs o W F z `z owe s z i W W Z w o � m m _._. --1--_ ._ 1s•tBe Q _Z N w i s'ce6 J i e IPb PN m o ISM 0� n tt g 3P1M. 11® n 1 U ti 1 L'LPG G Z. c n_ xm Ai I 02986 a iN j - - - Z"PP6 b u_ 2 I p ; 0,�W f'996 � I gg W SZ'BB6 g I C'PB6^o tl 6 J ' I O - 84'BB6 I M I M 1 I I o t r U1 r BP6 eo_ r� -^ ys a� 0 oL 2 I _ WON ._ I LbBfi� I I I 9L'BBe I I B'BP4 I I w O 69P6 I p 1 ow f6'B86 I I i 0 0 -96 I rc I _ pn 90'696 � I I'6B6 1 a 1 R I ♦ 1__- 4L'B86 S I I Z+ PP6 I 1 99'486 IT 1 9'LP6 0 1 1 Zfi'9B6 I 1 fi'pP6 I I i = of I S < 0 G O T 01 N OD 7 cn rn 00 rn OD n O m m Ln �W.x na zrl.,Oz/9f/s 6*P'wle..=om\�K��a\fi.P\p==\I+o-91\ da-is\�I<�e-s\rnez l\D3ACR\D\ \a 4 � _ § N � (� c �! ; SO § |§ � - f) LU § \LLJ � ; u j } LU / LA � � § §z ~ §| , $�I )� O� Ef § o - * 0 - \ k-zi \o 0 k . - | � �§k )k § §( \\ E 020w „ 2■| §!g §! - �4� 2 ^ k § )2 kji §§� §§! $ ,. o b k\ \ B \� kk( |2 . k }S §� o, !�� §r� - ■� \ � �( @ ® <; m;j . §�■ *�- K2§ § % is § :2 %a . 6i, B§ | $ E£ £§■; wE, =»� � #E , kea eee e S S 83 I ■ �§ ! ; t =4®®_m_ __�. Y R z� O LO N o o o 10 to 10 a I'] 0 N O O O O O O O O w610+81 IIYM ON3 CIO N • 1 \ 6Z'Hfot r6 Yc+81 ------_-..--lN_---- MOL o k«�1 60 _,—_-- -�\-- osWol�o v �- a No w w — oN�� a Z c Ja a 4� pVpmD o d Q ooW I 3 " ` " � F �� �g'o 00 liol S J 0 00+; U< 8t T1tlM lilY1S a-tsar m W o to O N o to O W x4w tD N to <F M h N W Z „allooio 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o Q Z i�4a n R <Ca� n n if) N O O O O O O O O O O O e ----.._ sS+91'1'1VM QN3 a'uol e W � HHiUI V1 I I J I of J ' CC I O'9lel n m6 efi2e+pl e0+91 =O tl I « - 9 V n I c�a 3 9 I Z p I N _' --.__..___l..- e- 'v r _n \ I om o9101 €s a W r,+s1 ntlM laves acg N o 1n o In o In o - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1a3kus H15 0 o m rn LO coo m I o 0 0 m rn rn rn o, � - OI+ZI T1YM ON3 5 I O6'Z66 6 I I T ' I J I J `, uezee Q ` 1 \ 1 \ Q ` a � 'R V O� I ' SP6V6 S No 1 I `rcr3 z Q W C aO 0 rB6 t 1 � oZ+ol llvm I.. c n o Ln o LD o Ll O a a o m a co co n n 0 o rn rn rn rn rn m o +6w.wq XY tt Hll r10Z/0U5 bruzIWMC416L1%3\rlucul�6wp\ooa\e�!�bt\r6u!�m0-IS\�6!�0-5\fYIB[I\O3JlC�\3\3Y\d / �� � i:. ��:�``• / L-4'r� may,��� �✓ �V� 1��=-- a7 II I / �/�` r'J � �='' ��,,, •�� try,`"' WEJ 50 ' IR �I�t FILE NO. TURNING MOVEMENTS �',ONE 320.229.<30G EXCEG128143 EXHIBITI ,zec zs- a.T e >o -F.o eo BOULDER PONDS a 117 DATE: NO.1 SEH N.sesm 05/30/2011 LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA � 4 e f ) �� �. ,\ j \lam%��• �`�.,.,�_ �r FIRENPm. i = �o i lit -✓-\i1 t r \✓ �! i I � i / FILE No 281 TURNING MOVEMENTS l/ 3 n-S EXCE0128143 BOULDER PONDS EXHIBIT y u� C'1 :7 50� S�fE nca 17 DATE: ouo.Mn se o- 05/30/2014 LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA NO. 2 FOCUSENGINEERING1 inc. MEMORANDUM Cara Geheren,P.E. 651.300.4261 Jack Griffin,P.E. 651.300.4264 Ryan Stempski,P.E. 651.300.4267 Date: July 24, 2014 Chad Isakson,P.E. 651.300.4285 To: Nick Johnson, City Planner Re: Bolder Ponds Cc: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Preliminary Plat Review From: Jack Griffin, P.E., City Engineer An engineering review has been completed for the Bolder Ponds development. A Preliminary Plan submittal was received consisting of the following documentation prepared by Evolution Engineering and Design or as noted: • Preliminary Site and Construction Plans dated June 2, 2014. • Project Manual for Grading, Roadway and Utility Improvements dated June 2, 2014. • Preliminary Plat dated June 2, 2014 prepared by E.G.Rud and Sons, Inc. • Hydrology Report, no date. • Wetland Delineation Report dated May 29, 2014 prepared by SEH, Inc. • Turning Templates dated May 30, 2014 prepared by SEH, Inc. • Xcel Energy Transmission Easement Agreement dated July 21, 2014. STATUS/FINDINGS: Engineering review comments have been limited for the purpose of Preliminary Plat issues. Additional Final Construction Plan review and comments will be provided once Preliminary Plat approval is granted for the development. Engineering review comments are as outlined below. PRELIMINARY PLAT • The construction of 5th Street North is required as part of the Bolder Ponds development.The construction plans include 5th Street North as part of the Plan set.The Preliminary Plat must be revised to include the full R/W area to accommodate the construction of 51h Street North, including the added R/W required from the Bremer Financial Services property.This added area needs to be Platted as R/W. • The street median Outlots should be Platted as public R/W. The City should use maintenance agreements with the HOA to facilitate the landscape maintenance of the median areas. The Preliminary Plat should be revised accordingly. • Additional R/W must be obtained along the east side of Cobblestone Plaza such that the R/W extends an additional 80 feet, well past the Cobblestone Path intersection. • Additional easement is required to provide a minimum 30-foot utility easement for the storm sewer pipe run from CS-600 to FES-600C. Part of this easement must be acquired from the adjacent Eagle Point Town Office property. • Additional easement is required to provide a minimum 30-foot utility easement for the storm sewer pipe run from CBMH 806 to CBMH 801. PAGE 1 of 6 WATERMAIN AND SANITARY SEWER PLANS • Sanitary sewer and watermain stubs to adjacent property and pipe oversizing will continue to be reviewed by City staff as the development progresses forward and oversizing routes may need to be changed as part of the final construction plans. Sewer and watermain oversizing is paid by the City as a reimbursement addressed within the development agreement. Sewer oversizing may be required from Hudson Boulevard to the Azur property or an 8-inch sewer may need to be stubbed north on 5th Street to the Azur property. i The 12-inch watermain oversize is appropriate as shown on the proposed plans. Additional oversizing may need to be extended to the site of Well No. 3, pending further staff review. i% The 12-inch watermain stub location at Outlot Q must be coordinated with Lennar to verify that the stub is placed in the appropriate location. i Sewer and water stubs may be needed to the north edge of the Lampert Lumber and or Cranky Ape properties. y Sewer and water stubs may be needed from 5th Street to Outlot N for service to the property south of Bremer Financial Services. • Sanitary sewer and watermain stubs have been proposed along Cobblestone Plaza to serve future commercial developments at Outlots K,J and M.The size and location of these stubs require further review with the applicant. • Detailed Sanitary Sewer and Watermain construction plans were submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat application. A detailed construction plan review will be completed upon Preliminary Plat approval. However,comments below have been provided for the applicant's use and information: ➢ Hydrant and system valve placement will be made per City standards and as laid out by City staff. Applicant shall submit an overall watermain plan for staff redlines. Y Utility alignments will be necessary to better maintain the sewer and water within the street section, in particular in areas where the street meanders or divides. Sanitary sewer MH's must be moved to centerline or center of drive lanes (i.e. MH 10, MH 23 and MH 36). Utility alignments will be necessary to eliminate or minimize the use of watermain insulation. Watermain insulation will only be allowed when alignment alternatives are not available. Watermain shall be placed to maintain appropriate storm sewer pipe separation. Sanitary sewer along Boulder Ponds Parkway may terminate after the service stub to Lot 11, Block 4, eliminating roughly 60 feet of sewer pipe. Sanitary sewer along Pebblestone Place may terminate after the service stub to Lot 8, Block 4, eliminating roughly 70 feet of sewer pipe. Y Sewer and water service stubs should be revised to eliminate bends and shall be perpendicular to the street whenever feasible. Stationing must be added to all profiles. y Profile elevation labels must be corrected for accuracy. The existing watermain must be shown in plan and profile along Hudson Boulevard. Y Correct "Existing Ground" and "Proposed Grade" call-outs on Sheet 9, Pebblestone Ridge Cove — 12" Watermain Loop Profile. Add hydrant at 12" plug on 5th Street(at approximate STA 21+90)for flushing purposes. Add vertical bends to accommodate severe grade changes at the Pebblestone Place watermain loop. GRADING,STORM WATER MANGEMENT AND EROSION CONTROL AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM • Preliminary Plat approval should be contingent upon additional plan revisions needed to provide a grading plan, storm water management plan and storm sewer system that complies with the requirements of the City of Lake Elmo Engineering Design Standards Manual. PAGE 2 of 6 • Grading plans must be resubmitted to include existing and proposed contours for a distance of 150 feet from all edges of the proposed Plat. Staff review can continue upon receipt. • Relocate Outlot L retaining wall to Outlot M. This should be owned privately, not by the City. • Outlot M retaining wall requires greater separation from the proposed storm sewer pipe. • Permission to grade and install storm sewer pipe is required from the adjacent Eagle Point Town Office Park for infrastructure behind Lots 9 and 10, Block 1, First Addition and potentially for the storm sewer run from this location to Hudson Blvd. • There are three new proposed storm water discharge points to Hudson Boulevard: Two new discharges to the south side of Hudson Blvd requires MnDOT permission.This permission is required before plan approval can be provided and any grading work can begin. One discharge point is along the north side of Hudson Blvd. owned by the City. Additional detail is needed before the City can determine acceptance of this new storm water discharge. • Lot 1, Block 1,Second Addition does not conform to City requirements for flood protection from Infiltration Basin 3C.The lot building type or grading for this lot and adjacent Outlot must be revised accordingly. • Storm sewer pipe alignments must be revised to better maintain the storm sewer within the street footprint. Areas include: y Bolder Ponds Parkway, between Outlot F and 5th Street. :- Pebblestone Place,from Bolder Ponds Parkway to cul-de-sac. y Pebblestone Terrace, near the cul-de-sac. Y Storm sewer must be a minimum of 15 feet from proposed retaining walls (near MH 1004). ➢ Storm sewer catch basins should be relocated from corners per the City standard details. All proposed pipe crossings must be perpendicular to street alignment (i.e. CB 516A and CB 515A). • Infiltration basin 2A Retaining Wall should be eliminated or relocated onto the adjacent private property. It appears that the wall can be eliminated if the adjacent lot is not a walk out. It is not recommended that the City take on ownership of this retaining wall. • The double retaining walls located in the Xcel Transmission easement area should be eliminated or relocated onto the adjacent private property. It appears that the walls can be eliminated if the adjacent lots are not walk out lots. It is not recommended that the City take on ownership of these retaining walls. • The HWL must be provided for Infiltration Basin 1B. • The storm sewer system or grading plans must be revised to provide the City standard minimum pipe cover of 3.5 feet. Changes must be made as part of the final construction plans. Several structures or pipe runs do not meet this minimum, but it appears these changes can be made without impact to the Plat. • Drain tile is required as part of the City standard street section at all localized low points in the street. Drain tile considerations may impact the storm sewer design and depth requirements at low points. • Storm sewer castings must comply with City of Lake Elmo Design Standards(i.e. proposed beehive castings). • The watershed has indicated that additional testing is required to verify the assumed infiltration rates at each basin. The City standard is to require multiple tests at each location and not allowing tests taken in the vicinity. Plan revisions may be required if rates do not support the design assumptions. • The plan must be updated to indicate wetland buffers for staff review. STREET, SIDEWALK AND TRAIL PLANS 5TH STREET NORTH: • 5th Street seeks to become the backbone of future development along the 194 corridor, essentially becoming the primary access in and out of the future neighborhoods. The street is required for the sole purpose to provide mobility to support the growth and development within the corridor.The quality of the street and its connections are critically important. The purpose of the proposed street standards are to 1) improve the function, mobility and appearance of the street, 2)encourage pedestrian and bicycle use, and 3) reduce the potential for speeding. PAGE 3 of 6 • The plan indicates a minimum 100 foot R/W as required,except for the additional R/W to be acquired from Bremer Financial Services. This area must be Platted as public R/W. • The proposed 2-lane collector Parkway street (5th Street) design and geometrics must meet all Municipal State Aid design standards for urban streets(8820.9936)for ADT> 10,000;40 mph design speed; and must be consistent with the detailed Parkway cross section installed throughout the remaining corridor segments. • The plans must include the City standard typical cross sections for 5th Street to ensure construction details are followed accordingly, including turn lane configurations. • The proposed alignment is consistent with the State Aid design intent. However, the proposed plan indicates impacts to adjacent properties. The applicant must coordinate the design of 5th Street with each adjacent property and must show the proposed plan and profile for a distance of 150 feet beyond the Plat for both Azur properties/Bremer and Lennar/Alan Dale. The matching profiles must be agreed to by all impacted properties. • Access spacing to 5th Street meets the guidelines for the Cities Transportation Plan.A full access is proposed at Boulder Ponds Parkway near the middle of the Plat and a partial access with Boulder Ponds Parkway at the north end. Additional access to 5th Street is not recommended throughout the remaining corridor. It is recommended that potential future access by Lampert Lumber and/or Cranky Ape properties be through Boulder Ponds Parkway or a future street to the east,then to 5th Street as part of a full access. • The signing and striping plan for 5th Street,Sheet SS1, must be updated to meet state aid standards and the 5th Street typical section detail for turn lanes. Signage and pavement markings for cross walks should meet the City standard for cross walk markings. • It is recommended that the 5th Street trail and sidewalks maintain the consistent boulevard alignment and layout per the City approved 5th Street typical section. Y The trail and sidewalk intersection crossings should occur within the R/W at the corners (see attached TKDA Traffic Engineering review memo). 51h Street does not have a stop condition and therefore the safer pedestrian crossing locations will be at the intersection corners. Y The sidewalk along the south of 5th Street should connect the median walk to the west boulevard walk. The second crosswalk should be provided along the east side of the 5th Street/Boulder Ponds Parkway and the signing and striping plan updated accordingly. Y Pavement marking crosswalks should also be added for east-west crossings. y A second 5th Street pedestrian crossing location should be considered near the north end of the Plat at the Xcel Transmission easement area before 5"Street begins the next horizontal curve into Azur properties. • Per the TKDA Traffic engineering review memo, the 5th Street and cross street medians must be adjusted so that they do not extend into the intersection. Medians should terminate at the cross street curb line. The proposed medians interfere with left turn movements and plowing operations. • Revise the 5th Street vertical sag curve to K=64 at STA 14+50. Minimum sag curve for 40 mph road is 64. • Corner curb radius must be 25 feet at 5th Street and must be shown on the plans. • Additional streetscape amenities are required along 5th Street consistent with the remaining corridor segments and the City design standard for 5th Street. L A detailed review of these plans are completed by the City's Landscape Architect. The plans must be detailed and dimensioned to indicate the specific locations for all trees, light poles, signs and utilities. This R/W corridor is very tight and specific spacing between amenities is critical to a successful design. A 2-foot clear zone must be maintained on each side of the trail and sidewalk at all locations to meet state aid design standards. HUDSON BOULEVARD TURN LANE: • Dedicated turn lanes are being provided along Hudson Boulevard to access the development at Cobblestone Plaza. The signing and striping plan for Hudson Blvd,Sheet TL1, must be updated to meet the current posted 50 mph design speed. PAGE 4 of 6 RESIDENTIAL STREETS • The applicant is proposing a roadway configuration that is generally acceptable and in accordance with City standard requirements. Primary and secondary access appears adequate for the site. • The plan indicates that residential streets are being proposed to a 28 foot width from back of curb to back of curb. Surmountable concrete curb and gutter are proposed in single family residential areas and B618 curb is proposed in commercial and multi-family areas. • The plan indicates a minimum 60 foot R/W as required. • The residential streets propose several medians that spilt the traffic into 2-one way drive lanes. It is recommended that plans be revised such that each lane is a minimum of 20 feet from face of curb to face of curb to meet minimum fire lane requirements. • The intersection of Pebblestone Terrace and Pebblestone Place create a very unique and unfamiliar intersection. Turning templates must be submitted to verify appropriate curb radius at all median curb corners and curb radius lengthened when required (Le T-S and H-1). 1 The sidewalk crossing(s) at this intersection must be reviewed and relocated to provide safe crossing(s) with snow storage considerations. The proposed crossing at Outlot F is not recommended. • The intersection of Cobblestone Path should be moved south as far as possible to provide added separation from the median at Outlot I. This becomes more important if a full access is contemplated in the future to serve the Cranky Ape and Lampert Lumber properties. Y Consideration should be given to shortening the Outlot I median. The R/W along the east side of Boulder Ponds Parkway, across from Cobblestone Path, should be extended further south at least 80 feet to facilitate a potential future road connection. • Corner curb radius must be indicated on the plans. For local streets a 20-foot radius must be used. • Minimum K-value for sag curves is 37. Revise sag curves along Pebblestone Place, Pebblestone Terrace,and Pebblestone Ridge Cove. Grades between 1+00 and 3+50 along Pebblestone Terrace should be revised to create a smoother transition and lesson the 5.45% grade, in particular since this road grade is a result of the area being filled. • Minimum K-value for crest curves is 19. Revise crest curve along Pebblestone Ridge Cove.Grades along this road should be somewhat reduced, in particular since the area is being filled. • The Pebbelstone Ridge Cove Plan View on sheet 24 must be revised to plan scale to facilitate plan review. • Cul-de-sac geometry must be revised as follows: Y The pavement width must be a minimum of 20 feet from face of curb to face of curb around cul- de-sacs to accommodate emergency vehicle access. With a 20 foot minimum pavement width,all cul-de-sacs must be signed as"No Parking Any Time". i The proposed cul-de-sac medians show a tear drop design at the cul-de-sac entrance.The tear drop must be revised to create a more rounded median to better facilitate snow plowing and emergency access. BOULEVARD LAYOUT ALONG RESIDENTIAL STREETS • Applicant is proposing a non-standard boulevard layout which is not consistent with several City design standards. It should be the applicant's responsibility to submit proposed alternative design details as part of the plan set that replaces the City standard design details that are not being met.This is required to detail the proposed design both for City review and for construction purposes. Multiple details will be required for the various boulevard layouts. • Construction plans must also be completely detailed for each varying condition because it cannot be left to the various contractors to field locate all the different infrastructure components that must be closely coordinated within the R/W corridor.Additional plan details must be submitted for staff review. • Meandering sidewalks and trails are proposed throughout the development. Sidewalks and trails outside of the R/W create on-going operation and maintenance difficulties.The following is strongly recommended if the sidewalks are allowed to meander outside of the R/W: PAGE 5 of 6 1 Sidewalk and trail easements shall be in a form created by the City. The easements shall extend from the R/W to the sidewalk/trail and extend an additional 10 feet past the sidewalk/trail to accommodate the utility corridor. A plan must be submitted showing the sidewalk/trail setback from each garage front demonstrating a minimum of 25 feet clearance to accommodate driveway parking without obstructing the walkway. ➢ Sidewalks along cul-de-sacs should extend around the outside of the cul-de-sac paved areas as shown along Pebblestone Terrace to keep the sidewalk available for snow removal. Sidewalks should not pass across the cul-de-sac island. This area must be preserved for significant snow storage. Y The plans must provide a detailed small utility corridor plan for City review and consideration which addresses small utility installation when crossing/interfering with sidewalks. • On Sheet 28 the trail must be revised to maintain a maximum trail grade at 6%. Location to edge of Plat must be coordinated with the Lennar development. PROJECT MANUAL/SPECIFICATIONS AND STANDARD DETAILS • A detailed Project Manual / Specifications were submitted as part of the Preliminary Plat application. A detailed review will be completed upon Preliminary Plat approval. However, comments below have been provided for the applicant's use and information: ➢ The governing specifications shall be the City Standard Specifications.These specifications, currently placed in the back of the project manual in Section 8, shall be placed near the front of the manual. ➢ The general requirements shall state the following: "The City Standard Specifications shall apply to the work performed under this contract.Any supplemental specifications are intended to supplement the City Standard Specifications;however they do NOT supersede the City Standard Specifications, Details, Design Standards, or ordinances unless specific written approval has been provided by the City." r- Any additional specifications for the project shall be clearly identified as"Supplemental Provisions" not"Special Provisions". • Geotechnical Report.The report must be resubmitted so that exhibits are legible.A plan must be submitted showing the soil boring locations with respect to the proposed improvements. Once received, additional borings may be requested to support the proposed pavement designs (i.e. along Sth Street or other local roadways). • Retaining Walls must be designed by a Professional Registered Engineer licensed in Minnesota.The design engineer of record will be required to certify that the walls were constructed in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. • Standard Details: Water Services to be extended to edge of utility easement, at least 10 feet beyond property line. Applicant's standard detail must be corrected. i= Sign details to be per City standards.Add City standard sign details and plan notes. PAGE 6 of 6 444 Cedar Street,Suite 1500 Saint Pout.MN 55101 651.292.4400 tkda.com TKDA Memorandum To: Ryan Stempski Reference: Boulder Ponds Development Copies To: Traffic Review City of Lake Elmo From: Bryant Ficek Project No.: 15545.000 Date: June 27, 2014 Routing: Geometric plans and cross sections for the proposed 5th Street corridor of the Boulder Ponds development were sent for our review on June 18. In addition to the plans, the City's desired typical sections and design guidelines were provided. Per your request, this information was reviewed in terms of conformance to State Aid standards. The design of the medians at intersections and the locations of crosswalks were additional issues raised for our review. The provided information is attached to this memorandum for reference. The proposed development is located on the north side of 1-94 and the Hudson Boulevard frontage road, between Inwood Avenue and Keats Avenue. As identified in the City's Transportation Plan of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan, a future collector roadway is expected to be located about halfway between 10th Street N and Hudson Boulevard. This new road is expected to provide for east-west travel between Inwood Avenue and Keats Avenue and beyond. The projected daily volume for this new roadway is 5,000 vehicles. The proposed development's 5th Street is anticipated to become part of that new collector roadway. State Aid Standards The MnDOT State Aid office provides design guidance in terms of lane widths and other roadway design details. Satisfaction of these guidelines means that a roadway is eligible to become a State Aid route, which then makes the road eligible for future maintenance and improvement funding. Based upon the information provided, the design of 5th Street meets the City's desired standards, which also satisfy the State Aid standards. The provided right-of-way, lane widths, and median widths meet or exceed the State Aid minimums, assuming a posted speed limit of 40 mph or less. Horizontal and vertical curves also meet the minimum standards for a 40 mph roadway. Pavement sections were not provided to check against the State Aid standard of a 9-ton roadway. However, the City's desired standards call for a 10-ton roadway. Assuming that 5th Street continues to match the City's desired standards, this detail would also satisfy the State Aid standards. An employee owned compony promoting affirmative action and equal opportunity Memo Page 2 June 27, 2014 Boulder Ponds Development Traffic Review City of Lake Elmo Pedestrian Movements The design shows a 10-foot trail on one side of 5th Street and a 6-foot sidewalk on the other. A wide boulevard separates the trail and sidewalk from the road except where right-turn lanes are introduced. Based on our review of the layout of the trail and sidewalk, our comments are: • The trail moves away from 5th Street at intersections, providing approximately 30 feet between the pedestrian crossing area and the vehicle stopping point. This is similar to pedestrian crossing treatments at roundabouts, allowing vehicles to focus on pedestrian movements first, followed by a focus on other vehicle movements. At stop controlled intersections, this approach is acceptable. Appropriate signing and striping should be used to notify drivers of the pedestrian crossing area. • Only one crossing of 5th Street is shown, on the west side of the Boulder Ponds Parkway intersection. Assuming that this intersection is under side-street stop control, with 5th Street traffic not stopping, the crossing should be located at the intersection rather than set back approximately 30 feet as shown. When traffic will not stop or slow at the intersection, setting the pedestrian crossing back in this manner does not offer benefits to the driver or the pedestrian. • Additional crossings of 5th Street should be considered, including mid-block crossings. Connections to and from development outlots not at intersections could also be considered. For instance, a sidewalk/trail connection linking outlot C to the trail on the north side of 5th Street with a mid-block crossing to the sidewalk on the south side of 5th Street may provide additional benefits for those residents. Proper signing and striping should be used for all crossings to improve safety. • At all crossings, the ramp to and from the roadway should be properly designed using the latest ADA standards. The provided plans do not uniformly identify pedestrian ramps at each crossing point, nor do they provide information regarding the pedestrian ramp design for those that are identified. • The south crossing of Boulder Ponds Parkway is not continuous across the intersection. Pedestrian routes should be reviewed to ensure that the routes are continuous and do not strand a pedestrian in a potentially dangerous situation, such as the middle of an intersection. Medians As mentioned, the raised median on 5th Street meets the City's desired standards in addition to the minimum State Aid standards. At the intersections, the minimum 4-foot width (face-of-curb to face-of-curb) is sufficient for those standards. However, a minimum width of 6 feet is desired if the median is to be used as a pedestrian refuge at crossing locations. A minimum width of 6 feet is also better in terms of space for sign mounting. The minimum 6-foot width could be achieved by reducing the left-turn lane and through lane to 11-foot widths at the intersections. This change in lane width would still satisfy State Aid standards. 1 Memo Page 3 June 27, 2014 Boulder Ponds Development Traffic Review City of Lake Elmo Vehicle turning movements should be considered at the intersections in regard to the median design as well. As currently shown in the plans, the median on 5th Street extends too far into the intersection and would interfere with left turn and through movements from the side streets. If you have any questions or comments regarding the information presented in this memorandum, please contact me at 651.726.7944 or bryant.f"icek(a-)tkda.com. 1 Station#1 F1 Station #2 3510 Laverne Ave.',o. 4259 Jamaca Ati.-e. No, Lake Elmo, M. N 55042 Lake Elmo, MN. 55042 b51-770-SOOC EM��-r' 65 1-779-9882 LAKE ELMO FIRE DEPARTMENT Julv 23, 2014 Nick Johnson The following are my comments as they relate to the preliminar,• plat approval for Boulder Ponds. O Hydrants need to be placed as close to roadways as is possible. • Hydrants"caps-" must meet our current requirement of Storz with center hex nut. • Hydrant]ocatingr/markin_"flags"must meet the current requirements, specifications of the water dept, • 1 have concerns writh the current street names shown on the drawing, I don't believe they are consistent with our naminginutnbering system. Q I would like to visit the matter of hydrant locations. We try to gei them on comers whenever possible to serve Both cross streets while still maintaining proper spacing. Hydrants in cul-de-sacs should h4 located centered at the end. 0 1 also have concerns with the "islands" in cul-de-sacs. This plan shows "tear drop" islands which make it veT,difficult to position and maneuver fire apparatus and greatly limits our ability to get all the necessary apparatus where needed when responding to an emergency. This problem is magnified in the winter when there are snow banks and roadways typically become narrower. 1 f y Greg Malmquist,Fire Chief "Proudl), Serving Nefghbai-s & Friends BOULDER PONDS - DESIGN REVIEW REPORT LAKE ELMO, MN LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN REVIEW DNIED JM.Y 2"") 014 REVIEWED PLAN SFT DATE-D .TUNE .2'"". 2014 Required Action [terns by Boulder Ponds Project Team I, F-Ilease 10C.(-.1to boulevard hoes between the sidewalk and back of curb, See 1yI--)ic.al Right of Woy Layout - City of i-ake Elmo Drawing No. 806 (311LIChed lo this docur-Tieril for ccmeci boulevaidiree loyoul location-S. 2. Generally plan is it) con,pliance. will' lhe landscape, requirerrienis. Since Ihis p(olin-linary plan doesn't call out eo%---h plani per localion on plan We L-11-c: exciied to look all tho next gent.--tation of than developroc-all sof which will have, lhal lcwal al specification tor our roview SINCERELY, LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE, INC. JSTEPI-ILN MASTEY, ASLA, CLARB, LLLD Al--' bf),4-C DIRECTOR OF DESIGN b A Y I FSS P I.A CF - S1 VA V 1 MN 5:-) 1 1 rJ1-1C)N[-: 651 .646. 1020 - FMAII : < A, r'-3 11 L _j S i^ I LL_j W 4.1 re L71 LY C.ly ul In at0: C14 LL b" (-I tti Lj its U) 0 m w LLJ n) 10 D Q In co 0) w DL EL C-I it r6 CA "1 -401 0 ul FF Yt uJ CL Uj v) CV W_ A.- if) C) U. Y cl 6 A., in OuL0 A, T cr) V1 W LIJ t; 0 0 n, 71 rJ U) t-2 ILI wit [if t.I Lil t. .......... IYPICAL RIGHT OF WAY LAYOUT F'E'BRUARY2013 S'l ANHARD DRAWING No. [ I nu III ti IN Cjrry A r_- PLMO OF L-Al,"�'L-E ELMC) 805 I-Ahl.FUN40 South Washington Watershed District 2102'Fo,we.t Ot Wc.Inclhury, MN 551-5 6,51-714-3714 Expires on 1-2/31 /2 015 Pursuml to the itl.tles JaT ilic Smith Washington W7tcrshe(f I)ISti-icl .Incl tlav: faistvic.Cs Sarand arels mid pollc-ics: and based upon sttatcr-raents and irlltsa'u"RA6011, c;Onte 41W in the.parmit i1ppliumivar, letters, malls. and Plans subnliltc d by Ow alvlic11111 alld collier"'Llpla(lraing dat;t,all ol'which are. made a part hurcol'lay relcre;nce, permission i;, hvre:hy gnmtv-d tc, the permitlee named below to conduct thr_activiry d"."crilled bclov", 11'an extcrastim to the hermit is nc:Mcd, Ilrc• permiltce shoUld Rarlalalit a written ruluest w Ow N(swic.t tat Imast N week:.;prior to the expiration elate, Boulder Ponds I j Yet. Jh•,trt,ltslN/q PUT) mixed use re side:ntialfcomme:rci i on �}+.i•!_1icl. :1-ce:l - - _ . ...,.� o. 1-Project j•arntrr,,r tdaerrrjtrllrrr �' Lake Elmo ' J11.�(} Hudson l;ivs,l N i 1'e) tier. rurrr ++ctlt�illurC:rrngwun Dub Hicll=,c_wta;l ()1'3 Botli lta' I'c1r_1c1s.LLC' 1'errrrtfftn�.drjrire.r.+ •------ _—.— . — 11 ISti Vrlcltr) !)r,Suite 35t), ! t1e:n P,uiric, MIN 55344 1'r rr„ltrrr.1,10fe + ft jrf rrrxus tdr j;rrrrr(hn J,ut!! — r 7 � 171:}7,l�lel� ctt'dV�l1)1;}icc18iol-I I 4 (1111 f t+l 2t 5 1.1() 1(,;rrc,wlTlrrnm,11'1t1JNfC jdren rr:rrncrJat rbp•Jlf.+rir'I rix(rlrrh•rrrcon�rrf}: -Junc 16, 2014 Awhorized Signature: "hate of i:srcurarlm: }llc lr;ly old, SNNI J -) 111-Csiclu-11 special stipulJatiolls Ala gas-iaulli mirvey of all gtol•niwlatel BN41''; (lxnu}:" Fain fatdcnt;, trenc}Ics, swales, etc.) is Io he suhrnit:ted u) Ow 1)istric.l Inr verification oi•r;t mplialluv will: The approved plall". ?, l'rnposrcl li}vrll' inllllrtJlltaJl I;ltt:1 will he verifleAci tllrrnal+,l1 cml-site:jesting, Should 13NIPf; reilleirt• IVViSiun�; to accommodate reduced infiltrtitiml rates. re:vision,;must be submitted to SWWI) inr a1)l)r v: l Grtisiun and Sediment Control Siipubition.; I, Perinitic'c' mic;.1 provide cloeumuntalion that tn} NI'DF-'. 1)UN11it ll i% 1=11 apprcivccl hy' tire: Minnc:scilli I'nllolion Conlrol Agency. ?, ire lion control nll:nsures stall hc' in plaue prior to grading,ae ivilics,ynd V%Ainttiiried tltraut;h prniCct coinplction, 3. All exposed Sails Nhull lie shihili ed m ithin 14 drxy's it nc}► hOng Mclivcly workcd Mid after the uninplelion of priding, SlopGti sicupL'r than 3:1 sliall be stabilized within 7 drays. A. The District inspecinr illay require: ildililinna) r;nwicrn ctrn ivil Icature.s. dependent upon situ cowlitinn. .5. Ruli;r to flu: M11CA "Protecting Water Quality in I Irban Areas- nvintlal at iutji;;!�y yti_�i_j)�,,I�;tirt�rilaid, +cntrr '��t�t�sr��-I�litl�in:li►t},Il.htnil ii}r l-IM11s. G. Contact the District inspec'lor tit 65 P714-3714 if you have ;my clucstiuns or W,discuss sate: stabilization prac;liecs, I,}tmerul Provisions I. Thu lv ject shall be in accordonuc Willi the platy} 1 lost recently submitled and approved by the District ti. liarl of the.tcc:arcl cil'this I,rnjcct.. 2. This permit is not us;ignable hey till' Perinittcc: cxetpt With the written consent of the SWWD, 3. The Pcnllititc shall grant access: to the silent till reirsc}n}rhle t.imus dudij and arla ccrostrtic:tiur} ttr tautlMrinit:l 1`Ll)1-VS;1t1ativcs of the SVVMR) liar inspection of the %vork authoriZUd livretinder, 4. in all cases wheic. the Permitic c. by I)erli}riving.the work authorized by this lionnit, sl}all involve llic iaking_ using„ or d.maWng of wj, 1vollcay rights or interests of-tiny otlivi•liensmi or persons. or cif any publicly! owned Imicls cn' improvements thereon or interests thercin, the Periniticc, before procccdilig shall obtain the wril n ismuent of all ptrsMn5 ta}Lt:OCieS, Of aui.haeitics concerned, and shrill ac-quirt. all properly, rights and interests needed for Llu� wVork. 5. 'Phis pennh is permissive only. No liability-shall 1)e• imposed on the W)X'.t7 or my of its officus, apcnts, or mriphgecs c}l-i'idully or personally. cin account.of tlir granting lwrecii'oi- on account many damage to any lic'I'ti n to lirnper'ty resuhWg Dunl any net or ►rriiission Uf the l'crmitice or any of its agents. cQuyeus. or cnntracic}rs. Ills punvil shrill not be vonsvued as ustnpping or limiting,any luzal claims air ril-ht. ofaclion Ill any Person i}g artist the Purinittec. its ttyvrits. employees or mintractorsi, lc}1' any dun}aj;c or in;jurs' resulling A-mn any sudi act or cinlissiun,or an uslcil}pirttt or Himking any lcptil chirn or right ur tuition or iliL s w-f-) against tilt.l}ct•niit(4c, its employ yes,of eontr•actonti for violation ofor iah"m lu cnulply with lire Penwi trrFlmdica wtv 111-ovis;iolis of law. lrclurirlg the Work conditions ary virGtImilered indieuling.that xoil or groundwater conit niintints may be present. work ti7um c:c:,ase ontil the SMM) has been inlui'n`iud, 'ri}c SVV%9_i ilmy require additional information and may require:that sdorinwatcr in:inagenicni plant he ameMud in c}.r'dtr tit l)mpuly il5iil}ape situ ttaormwater in the pres,enev of eantaininants. 6, Any sturniwatcr mmiagvincill facilities approved as parr of this liernlil shall he properly mainwinod ii_i perpetuity, it, tiscsure (hat they uonlinuc to kint;iiori as; originally desi; ncd. 7. Failury it) comply with the provision`;oFtbis liernlil is a violation ol'the law and dirty result in issuance of it sloli Work circler by the Dis(ric:l, From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject: Nick, In follow-up to our phone conversation earlier today, I would like to reiterate a concern that Lamperts would like to have considered as the Boulder Ponds Development plan is under review. As indicated on the Preliminary Plat the north end of Lamperts' property abuts the future 5th Street. It is our belief that sometime in the future part of our property will be best suited for residential development. We would like the possibility of future residential development of that property taken into consideration as the elevations for 5th street are being established. It would be beneficial if the elevation of 5th Street was such that minimal elevation change on our property will be necessary to develop a residential area that would be accessed from 5th Street in the future. Thanks for your consideration. We look forward to a response addressing the concerns expressed in this email. Bob Egan President&COO (651) 695-3671 1 From: Kyle Klatt Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:24 PM To: Nick Johnson Subject: FW: Planning Commission Agenda Packet for 12-9-13 From:jjjaros@mmm.com [mailto:jjjaros@mmm.com] Sent: Monday, December 09, 2013 2:20 PM To: Kyle Klatt Subject: Fw: Planning Commission Agenda Packet for 12-9-13 Hi Kyle, I had a chance to look at the materials for Boulder Ponds. Thanks for posting this on the web site. I understand the need to develop the property south of 10th street. From the public hearing on the Lennar site proposals, I understood that the greenway walk way path was going to be put on the southern 1/3 of the greenway buffer. The Boulder Ponds plans show the greeway buffer path it to be directly adjacent to the stonegate property and right next to my land. If we have a 100' buffer, don't put the path directly adjacent to my property. Is there a reason it can't be put on the south 1/3 of the greenway buffer like the Lennar properties agreement? If not in the south 1/3 of the greenway,why not down the middle of the buffer? Because of the power line easement, I can't put a fence on the property line so I would like to see the path away from my property. I was not vocal at the Lennar hearing on the pathway because I was OK with the placement in the southern 1/3rd of the greenway. I will be much more vocal with the placement of the Boulder Ponds path placement. On the Lennar proposal, I didn't like the lack of park area, but I am not an expert in the management of parks. Stonegate park will need to be larger with other amenities to support the population in these new developments if they don't have a park in their area. Thanks, John Jaros ----- Forwarded by John J Jaros/EG-Engrg/3M/US on 12/09/2013 01:55 PM ----- From: Tom Kreimer<tkreimer@comcast.net<mailto:tkreimer@comcast.net>> To: John Jaros<jjjaros@mmm.com <mailto:jjjaros@mmm.com>> Date: 12/07/2013 07:45 PM Subject: Fwd: Planning Commission Agenda Packet for 12-9-13 1 Hi John- Your email address wouldn't allow the attachment, so I am just sending the email.You can obtain the information from the Lake Elmo website under planning commission agendas. Tom Kreimer From: "Tom Kreimer"<tkreimer@comcast.net<mailto:tkreimer@comcast.net>> To: "Curt Monteith" <cmonteith@comcast.net<mailto:cmonteith@comcast.net>>, "Amy Betz" <ambetz@mmm.com <mailto:ambetz@mmm.com>>, "Family Betz" <betzfamily5@comcast.net<mailto:betzfamily5@comcast.net>>, "John Jaros"<jjjaros@mmm.com <mailto:jjjaros@mmm.com>>, "Craig Rossow" <craig@comfortbus.net <mailto:craig@comfortbus.net>> Cc: "Jay Morreale" <jay.morreale@sprint.com<mailto:jay.morreale@sprint.com>> Sent: Saturday, December 7, 2013 1:33:32 PM Subject: Planning Commission Agenda Packet for 12-9-13 Hi Neighbors- I just wanted to make sure you were aware of a Public Hearing at the Planning Commission meeting Monday night regarding the land behind your home (Boulder Ponds).You may want to review the attached materials. If you have any issues with anything, I suggest you attend the meeting- Monday night at 7pm. If you can't attend,you can always send written comments to Kyle Klatt (kklatt@lal<eelmo.org<mailto:l<klatt@lakeelmo.org>). Also, you can let me know your thoughts as well - but that isn't as good as attending or sending your comments in. Based on what we're forced to have,the plan looks pretty good. Personally, I would like to see a bit larger lots against our neighborhood, but I don't think we'll get that. My biggest problem with the plan is that they are showing the new trail directly adjacent to Stonegate. In prior meetings, it was agreed that the trail would be adjacent to the new neighborhoods.The council did not follow this on the Lennar development, so we need to be a bit more vocal about this aspect if it is something you care about. Craig, it looks like they are completely ignoring a buffer around your new land. Please consider attending the meeting if you have concerns.The further these things go,the harder they are to change. Now is the time to act if you care. Thank you! Tom Kreimer From: "Kyle Klatt"<KKlatt@lakeelmo.org<mai Ito:KKlatt@la keelmo.org>> To: "Sara Yocum (yocumrealestategroup@edinarealty.com <mailto:yocumrealestategroup@edinarealty.com>)" <yocumrealestategroup@edinarealty.com<mailto:yocumrealestategroup@edinarealty.com>>, daledorschner@comcast.net<mailto:daledorschner@comcast.net>, "Dean dodson"<Dean.dodson@gmail.com <mailto:Dean.dodson@gmail.com>>, "Jay Morreale (jay.morreale@sprint.com <mailto:jay.morreale@sprint.com> )" <jay.morreale@sprint.com <mailto:jay.morreale@sprint.com>>, "Jill Lundgren (pottingshedpottery@gmail.com 2 <mailto:pottingshedpottery@gmail.com>)" <pottingshedpottery@gmail.com <mailto:pottingshedpottery@gmail.com> >, "Kathy Haggard (haggardfive@hotmail.com <mailto:haggardfive@hotmail.com> )" <haggardfive@hotmail.com <mailto:haggardfive@hotmail.com>>, "Rolf Larson (halver@mac.com <mailto:halver@mac.com>)"<halver@mac.com <mailto:halver@mac.com>>,toddwilli@comcast.net<mailto:toddwilIi@comcast.net>, "Tom Kreimer (tkreimer@comcast.net<mailto:tl<reimer@comcast.net> )" <tkreimer@comcast.net<mailto:tkreimer@comcast.net>> Cc: "Dean Zuleger" <DZuleger@lakeelmo.org<mailto:DZuleger@lakeelmo.org>>, "Nick Johnson" <NJohnson@lakeelmo.org<mailto:NJohnson@lakeelmo.org>>, "Alyssa MacLeod" <AMacLeod@lakeelmo.org <mailto:AMacLeod@lakeelmo.org>>, "Adam Bell" <ABell@lakeelmo.org<mailto:ABell@lakeelmo.org>>, "Beckie Gumatz" <BGumatz@lakeelmo.org<mailto:BGumatz@lakeelmo.org>> Sent: Friday, December 6, 2013 4:48:05 PM Subject: Planning Commission Agenda Packet for 12-9-13 Members of the Planning Commission: Please find attached a copy of the Agenda and Packet for the Planning Commission's December 9, 2013 meeting. Staff will be bringing materials to the meeting concerning agenda item 5b (the 2014 work plan). If you need to reference the Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance in regards to item 4a,these materials can be accessed on the City's website. Stay warm and have a great weekend! Kyle Klatt Planning Director City of Lake Elmo (651) 747-3911 3