Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#14 Single Fire StationMAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 3/2/2016 REGULAR ITEM #: 14 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Reconsider Vote on Single Fire Station Concept SUBMITTED BY: Mayor Pearson THROUGH: City Clerk REVIEWED BY: City Clerk POLICY RECOMENDER: Fire Department/Public Safety Committee FISCAL IMPACT: None SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: Reconsider vote taken at the December 15th, 2015 Council Meeting regarding the Single Fire Station. LEGISLATIVE HISTORY: At the December 15, 2015 Council Meeting, the City Council considered a proposal to begin the process of transitioning to a single fire station operation for the City. The following excerpt from the Meeting Minutes reflects the motions made on that item: Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Bloyer, moved TO DIRECT THE LAKE ELMO FIRE DEPARTMENT TO MAKE PREPARATIONS AND DESIGNS TO MOVE TO ONE CENTRALIZED FIRE STATION, IDENTIFY AND SECURE AN APPROPRIATE SITE FOR A FUTURE FIRE STATION/PUBLIC SAFETY BUILDING. SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - - - - - - Introduction of Item .............................................................. City Administrator Report/Presentation…………………………………………… Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff ............................................. Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ............................................................... Mayor & City Council Discussion ....................................................................... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion.................................................................... Mayor Facilitates Councilmember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO AMEND THE PRIMARY MOTION BY STRIKING THE MOTION AND INSERTING “MAKE PREPARATIONS TO MOVE TO A SINGLE FIRE STATION AND IDENTIFY AN APPROPRIATE SITE. Motion failed 2 – 2 – 1 (Pearson, Bloyer – nay. Smith – abstain). Councilmember Smith, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO AMEND THE PRIMARY MOTION TO REMOVE THE LANGUAGE AFTER “STATION”. Motion failed 2 – 3 (Pearson, Bloyer, Lundgren – nay). Primary motion failed 2 – 3 (Fliflet, Lundgren, Smith – nay). BACKGROUND INFORMATION (SWOT): Strengths Ensure long range cost savings, prepare to meet future response needs of community. Weaknesses Increasing land costs. Delaying action until FD reaches critical staffing point and delivery of service is impacted. Opportunities Identify site while land is still available. Learn from other communities. Possibly partner with Washington County Sheriff’s Department and Lakeview EMS in combined Public Safety Facility. Threats Inability to staff by committing to failing Paid on Call system. RECOMMENDATION: “Motion to reconsider the December 15, 2015 City Council Meeting vote concerning the Single Fire Station concept”