Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout#07 - Financial Management Plan for Utility FundsSTAFF REPORT DATE: October 3, 2017 REGULAR ITEM #7 NO ACTION REQUIRED TO: City Council FROM: Brian A. Swanson – Finance Director AGENDA ITEM: Draft Financial Management Plan for Utility Funds REVIEWED BY: Kristina Handt – City Administrator BACKGROUND: The City retained the services of Northland Securities, Inc. to prepare an updated draft Financial Management Plan for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water Funds. The last iteration was presented to the City Council on October 18, 2016, which included operational costs developed by TKDA that Northland Securities Inc. incorporated into the Financial Management Plan, presented by Ms. Tammy Omdal. The update presented to the City Council this evening builds upon those premises, and incorporates updated information from the City’s utility billing system, 2016 Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR), 2017 Budget, proposed 2018-2022 Capital Improvement Plan, and updated utility connection estimates. On September 21, 2017, Ms. Omdal of Northland Securities, Inc. presented the draft report to the Finance Committee, with both she and City staff available to answer any questions. Based on that meeting, an updated draft Financial Management Plan for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water Funds is being presented by Ms. Omdal to the City Council this evening for review and comment. QUESTIONS BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL: 1) Does the City Council have any questions regarding the process and information?2) Would the City Council like to have any adjustments made to the report? DISCUSSION: Ms. Omdal will present information contained in the report, with both she and staff will be available to answer questions from the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: Timely and accurate information pertaining the Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Sewer Funds will allow the City Council to make informed decisions regarding utility rates, and the long-term sustainability impacts of those rate adjustments. RECOMMENDATION: None this evening, as this report is an information sharing for both the City Council and community. ATTACHMENTS: 1)Draft Financial Management Plan for Water, Sanitary Sewer and Storm Water Funds Northland Securities, Inc.45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000Minneapolis, MN 55402(800) 851-2920Member NASD and SIPC Letter ofTransmittal Executive Summary 1 Organization of the Report....................................................................................................................1 Study Approach..........................................................................................................................................1 Conclusions and Recommendations..................................................................................................2 Table A - Growth in Residential Equivalent Units.....................................................................3 Table B - Annual Estimated Rate Increases.................................................................................3 Table B-1 - Utility Rates......................................................................................................................3 Table C-1 -Water Fund Operating Expenses and Unrestricted Cash................................4 Table C-2 - Sanitary Sewer Fund Operating Expenses and Unrestricted Cash..............5 Chart 1 -Year-end Cash Balances ..................................................................................................6 Background 7 Water..............................................................................................................................................................7 Sanitary Sewer............................................................................................................................................7 Storm Sewer.................................................................................................................................................7 Capital Improvement Plan 8 Capital Projects...........................................................................................................................................8 Source of Funding for Capital Projects...............................................................................................8 Debt Service.................................................................................................................................................8 Table D-1 - Capital Improvement PlanWater.................................................................................10 Table D-2 - Capital Improvement Plan Sanitary Sewer ..............................................................11 Table D-3 - Capital Improvement Plan StormWater...................................................................12 Chart 2 - Estimated Debt Outstanding atYear End.....................................................................13 Chart 3 - Estimated Annual Debt Service........................................................................................14 Utility Rates 15 Key Factors.................................................................................................................................................15 Annual Operating Expenditures.........................................................................................................15 Metropolitan Council Environmental Services..............................................................................15 Annual Capital Expenditures...............................................................................................................16 Debt Service...............................................................................................................................................16 Growth in Customers..............................................................................................................................16 Available Other Revenue Sources......................................................................................................16 Historical Utility Rates............................................................................................................................17 Future Utility Rates..................................................................................................................................17 EstimatedVolumes ofWater Sold and Sanitary Sewer Billed..................................................17 Table E - Growth Projections................................................................................................................18 Chart 4 - Sanitary Sewer REU Platted and Connected byYear ................................................19 Chart 5 -Water REU Planned and Connected byYear................................................................19 Table F -Water Fund - Fees and Charges and Customer Data.................................................20 Table G - Sanitary Sewer Fund - Fees and Charges and Customer Data..............................21 Table H - StormWater Fund - Fees and Charges and Customer Data...................................22 Chart 6 - EstimatedVolumes ofWater and Sanitary Sewer......................................................23 Financial Plans 24 Key Assumptions......................................................................................................................................24 Water Fund.................................................................................................................................................25 Table I-1 - Pro Forma.......................................................................................................................26 Table I-2 - Cash Balance.................................................................................................................27 Table I-3 - Operating and Other Expenses.............................................................................28 Chart 7 -Year End Cash Balances...............................................................................................29 Chart 8 - Source and Use of Funds............................................................................................29 Sanitary Sewer Fund..............................................................................................................................30 Table J-1 - Pro Forma......................................................................................................................31 Table J-2 - Cash Balance................................................................................................................32 Table J-3 - Operating and Other Expenses.............................................................................33 Chart 9 -Year End Cash Balances...............................................................................................34 Chart 10 - Source and Use of Funds..........................................................................................34 StormWater Fund....................................................................................................................................35 Table K-1 - Pro Forma.....................................................................................................................36 Table K-2 - Cash Balance...............................................................................................................37 Table K-3 - Operating and Other Expenses............................................................................38 Chart 11 -Year End Cash Balances............................................................................................39 Chart 12 - Source and Use of Funds..........................................................................................39 Appendix 40 Appendix A - Example Quarterly Utility Fees Payable by PropertyTypes...........................40 Appendix B - Chart 13 - Combined Utility Funds Restricted Cash and Debt......................41 This report was prepared by Northland Public Finance, a division of Northland Securities, Inc., for the purpose of SFWJFXJOHUIFmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODFPGUIF$JUZPG-BLF&M mo’s enterprise funds, including theWater Fund, the Sani- tary Sewer Fund, and the StormWater Fund to determine the appropriate fees and charges to fund the systems. The process involved the projection of revenues and ex- pendituresandincorporationoftheCity’splansforcapital JNQSPWFNFOUT BOEQMBOTGPSmOBODJOH JOUPUIFmOBODJBM projections along with estimated growth in customers. Recommendationsincludedinthereportarebasedonin- GPSNBUJPOQSPWJEFEUP/PSUIMBOEGSPN$JUZTUBõBOEPUIFS City consultants and certain assumptions as prepared by Northland and detailed in the report. To the extent the assumptions in the report change in the months and years ahead, which they will, the City will OFFEUPBEKVTUJUTmOBODJBMQMBOTBDDPSEJOHMZ #FGPSFPõFSJOHDPODMVTJPOTBOESFDPNNFOEBUJPOTGSPN thestudy,anexplanationoftheorganizationofthereport BOEUIFTUVEZBQQSPBDIJTPõFSFE Organization of Report This report is organized into six sections: 1. Executive Summary provides information on the or- ganization of the report, study approach, and conclu- sions and recommendations. 2. Background discusses the historical context, includ- ing growth and development of the community, and performance of the utilities. 3. Capital Improvement Plan provides information on the plans for infrastructure improvements for the utilities. This includes estimates on project costs and sources of funds to pay for the improvements. Infor- mation on debt service is also included. 4. Utility Rates provides current, and future estimated utility rates that will be necessary to maintain a posi- UJWFmOBODJBMDPOEJUJPOGPSUIFVUJMJUZGVOET*OGPSNB tion is provided in the Appendix for impact of rates changes on customers. 5. Financial Plans are provided for the Water Fund, Sani- UBSZ4FXFS'VOE BOE4UPSN8BUFS'VOE5IFmOBO cial plans provide both historical, current, and future sources and uses of funds and balance sheet infor- mation. Financial plans take into account capital im- provement plans, debt service, and proposed rates. 6. Appendix provides supplemental information to the report. Study Approach The following steps were taken as part of the study: • City provided information on the following: -historical spending and revenues, and future capi- tal improvement plans; -estimated growth in customer units from residen- tial and commercial development; and QSFMJNJOBSZmOBODJBMEBUBBOEUIF$JUZT Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports as of De- cember 31, 2016. • Information provided by the City was organized, ana- MZ[FE BOEVTFEUPTVQQPSUUIFEFWFMPQNFOUPGmOBO DJBMQMBOT0ODFUIFQSFMJNJOBSZmOBODJBMQMBOTXFSF EFWFMPQFEUIFOEJõFSFOUTDFOBSJPTXFSFDPOTJEFSFE BOEBOBMZ[FEXJUI$JUZTUBõUPEFUFSNJOFJNQBDUPO utility rates. •$JUZTUBõPõFSFEJOQVUBOEGFFECBDLPOUIFBTTVNQ tions and desired outcomes. • A draft of the report was prepared. *UJTJNQPSUBOUUPOPUFBTQFDUTPGmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODF not reviewed as part of this study: •5IFWBMJEJUZPGUIFBTTVNQUJPOTBOEmHVSFTQSPWJEFE by the City on future estimated growth was not re- viewed. • Analysis of the basis for the City’s determination of current utility fees and charges was not reviewed. •5IFmOBODJBMJNQBDUPGQPUFOUJBMDIBOHFTUPUIFFYJTU ing tier structure for charging for water and sanitary sewer services was not reviewed. • NorthlanddidnotreviewanyCitypreparedproforma as part of the study and we are not aware of how this report may compare to any prior or current City pro forma. • The scope of the study did not include a review and comparison of the City’s utility fees and charges to other cities. • TheCityisnotabletoprovidevolumedatabytier. Be- cause historical volume data is not available, the re- port makes certain assumptions for future volume of water and sanitary sewer volume billed by tier and in total. Changes to the assumption for average volume QFSDVTUPNFSXJMMJNQBDUUIFmOBODJBMSFTVMUTJODMVEFE in the report. Conclusions and Recommendations The following conclusions and recommendations are of- fered as a result of the study: To meet service demands from growth in customers, the City is planning for capital improvement projects. It needs to be emphasized that the scope, timing, and cost of the capital improvement projects included in this report are preliminary estimates. The City provid- ed a projection of improvement projects with gross estimatesforprojectcoststoprovideareasonableba- sis for the pro forma analysis included in the report. TheCitywillneedtocontinuetoreviewandrevisethe capital improvement plans. Timing for capital projects will be driven by develop- ment. The planned improvements that are currently included in the capital improvement plan are antici- patedtobepaidthroughacombinationofissuanceof debt, special assessments, grants, and cash. Inadditiontotheimpactoffuturegrowthonthecapi- tal improvement plan, the actual timing for the build out of already approved housing development and DPNNFSDJBMBSFBTXJMMIBWFBTJHOJmDBOUJNQBDUPOUIF estimates for future revenues. TableA on page 3 provides a summary of the total esti- mated growth for residential equivalent units (platted and connected).The growth estimates were prepared CZ$JUZTUBõTableEonpage18providesthedetailedin- formation on the total estimated growth summarized in Table A. The estimates for growth in customers has an impact on the establishment of future utility rates and the resulting revenue and year-end cash projec- tions for the utility funds. The City should continue to carefully monitor its estimates for future growth in customers against actual development. /PUFUP5BCMF"5IFSFJTBEJõFSFODFCFUXFFO4FXFSBOE8BUFSVOJUT showninTableAbecausesomecustomerswillconnecttoeithermunic- ipal water or sanitary sewer, but not both.The sanitary sewer improve- NFOUTDPNJOHUPUIF0ME7JMMBHFBMTPBDDPVOUTGPSUIFEJõFSFODF The report assumes annual increases in the fees and chargesforutilityservicesbeginninginyear2018.The increasesareneededtoensuretheCityisabletomain- UBJOTVöDJFOUDBTIJOUIFGVOETPWFSUIFMPOHUFSN There is no change estimated in the fees charged for development (connectionandavailably charges) only to the base and usage fees for service.TableB provides information on the annual estimated rate increases. Table B-1 provides a summary of the utility rates as included in the report for the next ten years. Actual mOBODJBMSFTVMUTBOEHSPXUIJODVTUPNFSTXJMMJNQBDU Note toTable B-1: Table B-1 does not include all of the tier rates. SeeTables F-H for more information. year-end unrestricted cash balance and operating ex- penses (not including depreciation) and unrestricted cash as a percentage of operating expenses for the Water Fund.TableC-2 on page 5 provides the same in- formationfor the Sanitary Sewer Fund.Chart1 on page 6, providesa summary of thetotalestimated year end cash balances by fund. It is estimated that in future years the funds will begin to draw on overall cash bal- ances to cover capital and debt service. The City may need to consider rate increases beyond what is pres- FOUMZJODMVEFEJOUIJTSFQPSU"DUVBMmOBODJBMSFTVMUT will need to be monitored to determine what may be necessary in the future years. the actual utility rate increases that may be needed. TheCityshouldestablishannualuserratesconcurrent with the development of the following year’s budget. It is important to maintain a long term, forward look- ing view for the ongoing management of the utility funds to avoid potential adjustments to utility rates CBTFEPOQSJPSZFBSmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODFBMPOFXJUI PVUUBLJOHJOUPBDDPVOUGVUVSFmOBODJBMQSPKFDUJPOT BOEQPUFOUJBMDIBMMFOHFT'VUVSFmOBODJBMDIBMMFOHFT NBZDPNFGSPNUIFEJõFSFODFCFUXFFOFTUJNBUFE andactualgrowthincustomers,unanticipatedcapital funding pressures, and other unanticipated expense or revenue shortfalls. There are no changes recommended at this time to the City’s rate structure (i.e., volume tiers). As the City gains more experience operating the expanded utili- UJFTBOENPSFmOBODJBMIJTUPSZCFDPNFTBWBJMBCMF UIF City should evaluate whether the current rate struc- ture is continuing to meet the City’s objectives. Theutilityratesincludedinthisreport,combinedwith the estimated volumes for water and sanitary sewer plus the estimated revenue to be collected from de- velopment charges, will provide cash needed to op- erate the utilities, maintain capital assets, and to pay debt service. The Financial Plan Section of this report provides a break-down of cash balances for each of the utility funds based on the following: 1) restricted cash for planned capital; 2) restricted cash for debt service/calling of bonds; and 3) unrestricted cash available equivalent to 35-50% of anticipated operat- ing expenses. TableC-1 provides a summary of the estimated annual Note to Table C-11: Amounts shown are estimates based on the assumptions and information includedin the report. Note to Table C-2: Amounts shown are estimates based on the assumptions and information includedin the report. Chart1 shows that cash bal- ances in the utility funds are estimated to remain stable, with growth, over the next several years. The cash balances will begin to decline as planned, as revenue collected from development (trunk line availability and con- nections charges) is used to pay down debt outstanding. The increase in cash from 2016 actual to 2017 is due to the col- lection of the approximate $3.4 million receivable from other governments (state funding) in 2017 for capital improvements made in 2016. The City of Lake Elmo is located on the eastern edge of the Twin Cities metropolitan area. The City’s 2030 Com- prehensive Plan forecasts and provides for approximately eighttimesthegrowthinhouseholdsandpopulationdur- ing the 2000-2030 planning period than was experienced during the 1980-2000 period. The City reports an estimated 2010 population of 8,069 and 2,774 households (2010 Census). Population is esti- mated to increase to 10,500 by 2020 and households to 3,800 ( ). The land area for the City en- compasses approximately 15,250 acres. The City’s 2030 Comprehensive Plan provides guidance on the City’s plans for managing future demand for utility infrastructure. The City is preparing to update to its Com- prehensivePlan, theupdatedPlan willlikely haveimplica- tions for the assumptions included in this report. Water Utility Lake Elmo owns, operates and maintains a municipal wa- ter supply and distribution system. The City has a goal to serve existing population desiring public water supply while preparing the system to allow people to connect as development occurs or existing areas request service. This policy guides the City’s capital improvement plan- OJOHBOEUIFOFFEUPNBJOUBJOBnFYJCMFBOESFTQPOTJWF water system. Capital planning includes projects to cor- SFDUFYJTUJOHEFmDJFODJFTBOEUPFYQBOEUIFTZTUFN The City uses an enterprise fund to account for its water operations. The net position in the Water Fund totaled $13,394,649 and cash balance $135,048 as of December 31, 2016. SanitarySewer Utility PropertyownersintheCityareservedbyindividualsewer systems or in limited areas by municipal sewer. Capital planswillprovideforanincreaseinthenumberofproper- ties to be served by municipal sewer and connection to the RegionalSewerSystem. The Metropolitan Council En- vironmentalServices (MCES)has extendedregionalsewer service to serve a greater area of the City. The City uses an enterprise fund to account for its sewer operations. The net position in the Sewer Fund totaled $5,570,928 and cash balance $2,606,515 as of December 31, 2016. StormWater Utility TheCityoperatesastormwaterutility. Thesystemofcon- veyancesisownedandoperatedbytheCityanddesigned for collecting or conveying storm water.The City collects anannualfeefrompropertyownersthat isusedtopayfor the cost of constructing and maintaining the system. The City uses an enterprise fund to account for its storm water operations. The net position in the Storm Water Fund totaled $1,414,436 and cash balance $1,945,366 as of December 31, 2016. Thisreportincludesacapitalimprovementplan(the“CIP”) thatincludescapitalprojectsfundedfromutilityrevenues and accounted for the in the utility funds.TablesD-1through D-3 beginningonpage10,providedetailsonplannedcap- ital spending for each of the utilities. It is important to emphasize that the CIP included in this SFQPSUTIPVMECFDPOTJEFSFEBXPSLJOHESBGU5IFTQFDJmD costestimatesincludedforeachoftheprojectsprovidesa reasonablebasisfortheproformaanalysisincludedinthis SFQPSU#VUJUJTJNQPSUBOUUPSFDPHOJ[FUIBUUIFTQFDJmD projectsthatmayactuallybeauthorizedinthefuture,and the actual costs, may vary greatly fromwhat is included in this report. Capital Projects The projects included in the CIP include projects to ex- QBOEUIFDBQBDJUZBOEDPSSFDUEFmDJFODJFTPGUIFXBUFS and sanitary sewer systems.The City is a developing com- munity with utility expansion needs. Planned projects in- clude expansion of the City’s water supply capacity and distribution system. Sanitary sewer services have been expandedthroughtheconstructionofconnections tothe Regional Sewer System. As a developing community, the City’s capital improve- ment plans focus on expansion and does not presently include any material capital spending for maintenance of existingsystems.Thiswillneedfutureconsiderationbythe City as the community develops and infrastructure ages and requires major maintenance and/or replacement. StormWaterProjects For the storm water system, it should be noted that the CIPincludesprojects for Phases2 and3 forregionaldrain- BHFJNQSPWFNFOUT5IF$JUZ&OHJOFFSIBTJEFOUJmFEUIF following issues for the storm water utility that are antici- QBUFEUPCFBEESFTTFEJOUIFOFYUmWFUPUFOZFBST • Phase 2 Downtown Regional Drainage project consisting of land acquisition (Shiltgen property west of Lake Elmo Avenue and north of CSAH 14), a storm water pond, and storm water diversion QJQJOHUP4VOmTI-BLF • Phase 3 Downtown Regional Drainage project consisting of storm sewer piping south of CSAH 14nearHagbergs.Thepondingmaybedeveloper paid, but for the purposes of this report it is as- sumed to be paid from utility revenue. • KraemerLakeFloodplainstudywillbeneededbe- foredevelopmentcanoccurinI-94corridor,Phase 3 area (between Keats-Lake Elmo Avenue). The City anticipates grant funds to pay for the study. Source of Funding for Capital Projects The source of funding for the planned capital projects includes one of the following sources or a combination thereof: fund balance (cash); bond proceeds; special as- sessments; and/or grants. Debt Service Planned funding for utility infrastructure projects antici- pates the issuance of debt to undertake certain planned improvements and to manage annual fee increases. TheprojectionsassumethattheCitywillissuegeneralob- ligation bonds secured by revenues from the utility funds to pay principal and interest. This approach provides the lowest cost of debt. These bonds will not count against the City’s debt limit. Debt management is an important factor in ongoing capital improvements planning. The estimates for debt service are based on bonds to be paid over 15 years and level annual debt service. For bonds supported by special assessments, the special as- sessments are estimated to be payable over 20 years. Theestimatedinterestrates usedto calculateannualdebt service are generally based on today’s current rate envi- SPONFOU5IFBDUVBMJOUFSFTUSBUFTXJMMEFQFOEPOmOBM structure and market conditions at time of issuance. Charts2 and 3 on pages 13 and 14, provide information on the City’s existing and estimated future debt obligations supportedbytheutilityfunds.Chart2 includesinformation on estimated debt (bonds) outstanding as of year-end for thecombinedutilityfunds.Chart3 includesinformationon estimatedannualdebtservice(principalandinterest)pay- ments for the combined utility funds. The annual debt outstanding as of year-end shown in Chart 2 includes general obliga- tion revenue bonds secured by water, sanitary sewer, and storm water revenues. The chart includes both existing debt outstanding (as of Oc- tober 2, 2017) and estimated debt anticipated to be issued in the future and paid from utility revenues. Future bond issuance estimates are based on the City’s capital improve- ment plan. Chart2 includes debt support- edbyutilityrevenueonlyand does not include existing or future estimated debt that is paid from property tax levy. Theannualdebtservice(prin- cipal and interest) shown in Chart 3 includes general ob- ligation revenue bonds se- cured by water, sanitary sew- er, and storm water revenues. The annual amounts include bothexistingdebtservice(on outstanding bonds) and esti- mated debt service on bonds anticipated to be issued in the future and paid from util- ity revenues. Future bond is- suance estimates are based on the City’s capital improve- ment plan (seeTable D). Chart3 includes debt support- edbyutilityrevenueonlyand does not include existing or future estimated debt that is paid from property tax levy. Key Factors 1SPKFDUJOHUIFVUJMJUZSBUFTOFDFTTBSZUPNBJOUBJOUIFm nancialstabilityoftheCity’sutilityoperationsrequiresde- velopment and analysis of the following key factors: • Estimates for future annual operating expenditures, including personnel, materials and supplies, cost of electricity, and other operating expenses. The City contracted with TKDA Engineering Firm in 2016 to perform a review of the City’s operations. The results of the TKDA review serve as the basis for the future annualoperatingexpendituresincludedinthisreport. • Metropolitan Council Environmental Service (MCES) sewer fee charged to the City by the Metropolitan Councilforregionalcollectionandtreatmentofwaste water. This is an operating expense that the City does not have control over. Future charges payable to the MCES are calculated based on total estimated annual sanitary sewer volume and the MCES current rate (as PG JOnBUFECZBOOVBMMZ • Annual capital expenditure to maintain and improve the utility systems. • Annual debt servicePOCPOETJTTVFEUPmOBODFDBQJ tal improvements. • Growth in customers using and paying for the sys- tems.Growthincustomerswillprovideadditionalrev- enue to the systems at time of platting, connection, and on-going usage, but will also create additional demand for services. • Available other revenue sources other than fees and charges paid by customers of the utility systems. Annual Operating Expenditures Costs incurred in operating the utility systems, which are used up in the period in which acquired, are recorded as operating expenditures. Annual growth in operating expenditures, not including the MCES charge, has been modest. It is anticipated that growth in future years will beapproximately2.0%annually,withsomelimitedexcep- tions. The operating expense projections included in this report are informed by the report prepared by TKDA, consultant to the City. Depreciation is reported as an operating ex- penditures and is the process of allocating the costs of an asset over its useful life in a systematic and rational manner. Depreciation is estimated to change with capital spending anddepreciationofbothexistingandfutureac- quired assets. MetropolitanCouncil Environmental Services TheMCESchargetocitiesforregionalcollectionandtreat- ment has been volatile in recent years. MCES experienced SFWFOVFMPTTFTGSPNUIFTJHOJmDBOUESPQJOSFHJPOBMEFWFM opment during the recession which has caused a corre- sponding decline in revenue collected by the Council for Sewer Availability Charges (a one time fee for new con- nections).Forprojectionpurposes,thestudyassumesthat future charges paid to MCES for collection and treatment will increase by 5.5% annually. This is part of the annual operating expense to the City’s Sewer Fund. The City accounts for the collection and payment of the MCES “Sewer Availability Charge” (SAC) through an ac- counts payable account. The operating expense report for the Sanitary Sewer Fund (see TablesJ-1andJ-3 on pages 31 and 33 do not include a separate revenue andexpense line item for the MCES SAC. Annual Capital Expenditures TheCIP anticipates paying for futurecapitalimprovement project costs with a combination of revenue sources. The City anticipates future development will provide revenue totheCityforpayingforutilityexpansionthroughthecol- lection of development fees (an availability and a connec- tion charge). Paying for annual planned capital improvement projects with cash may be a sound strategy depending on the de- tails of the project. It avoids incurring annual interest ex- pense. However, this strategy requires advance planning and implementation of utility fees and charges that pro- WJEFBEFRVBUFDBTInPX For large (non-routine) capital expenditures or unantici- pated capital expenditures, the use of bonding to fund capital minimizes annual rate increases that otherwise would be necessary. It also allows the City to charge fu- ture customers the cost of infrastructure with a longer useful life, versus putting the entire burden on today’s customers.The CIP anticipates bonding.The resulting an- OVBMEFCUTFSWJDFPOUIFCPOETJTJODMVEFEJOUIFmOBODJBM plans for the funds. Debt Service Debt service in the funds is paid from revenue collected from utility fees, availability and connection charges, and special assessments. The CIP anticipates debt issuance to be supported by the revenues within the utility funds. All DVSSFOUBOEGVUVSFEFCUJTBDDPVOUFEGPSJOUIFmOBODJBM plans that are included in this report. The estimated debt service on future bonds is based on 15 years and bonds payable at current market interest rates. Future estimated VUJMJUZGFFTBOEDIBSHFTSFnFDUUIFDPTUPGUIFFTUJNBUFE increase for debt service. Growth in Customers Growth in customers from development is the most im- portant factor in determining the projections for future utilityrates.Buildoutofapproveddevelopmentswillbring anincreaseinrevenuetotheutilityfundsthroughthecol- lection of availability and connection charges and fees collectedforserviceandusage ofthe systems. Availability chargesandconnectionchargesareonetimechargescol- lected at the time of development and connection to the system. Estimating the increase in future customers is the NPTUWPMBUJMFGBDUPSJOEFWFMPQJOHmOBODJBMQSPKFDUJPOT for the utility funds.TableE on page 18 and Charts4and5on page 19 include information on the estimated growth in customers or residential equivalent units (“REU”) from de- velopment. The estimated growth in REU’s was prepared CZ$JUZTUBõBOEQSPWJEFEUP/PSUIMBOEGPSUIJTSFQPSU The pace of growth in customers from development will increase or decrease estimated revenues shown in this report and impact future utility rates. For this reason it is DSJUJDBMUIBUUIF$JUZVQEBUFJUTmOBODJBMQMBOTCBTFEPOBD tual growth. Available Other Revenues There is limited other revenue. The majority of the cost to operate and maintain the system is paid from charges collected from those using the system. Other revenue in- cludes interest income, special assessments, and grants. Historical Utility Rates Information on historical rates is provided in Tables F-H beginning on page 20 for each of the utility funds. Rates shown are billed quarterly, with the exception of the stormwaterfeewhichisbilledto customersreceivingthis charge on an annual basis. Prior to 2017, the City charged a basic service fee for water only. Future Utility Rates Information on estimated utility rates for years 2018 to 2026 is included in Tables G-H for each utility fund. The fu- UVSFSBUFTSFnFDUUIFSBUFTOFDFTTBSZUPNBJOUBJOBEFRVBUF cash balance in the utility funds. These rates applied against estimated customers and usage is used to calcu- late the annual estimated charges for services fees shown JOUIFmOBODJBMQMBOT QSPGPSNB GPSFBDIVUJMJUZGVOE The report assumes a 3.0% annual increase in water rates anda1.0%annualincreaseinandsewerratesbeginningin 2018.Theannualrateincreaseisassumedonthequarterly basefeeandusagefees only.Theannualfeeforstormwa- ter is assumed to increase by $5.00 per year beginning in 2017 and then by $10.00 per year beginning in 2021.The increases are needed to ensure the City is able to main- UBJOTVöDJFOUDBTIJOUIFVUJMJUZGVOETPWFSUIFMPOHUFSN There is no estimated change to the rates charged for de- velopment, the connection and availably charges. The tier structure the City uses for charging customers for water, based on volume of water sold, was not reviewed aspartofthisstudy.Thecurrentadoptedtierstructureap- pears to be reasonable. The City changed the basis for charging sanitary sewer customers in 2017. Residential customers are charged a CBTFGFFGPSUIFmSTU HBMMPOTPGTFXFSWPMVNFCJMMFE per quarter andthen charged on a per 1,000 gallons basis for volume billed above this usage. EstimatedVolumesofWater Sold and Sanitary Sewer Billed Annual estimated volume of water sold by tier and esti- mated sanitary sewer billed by year is included in Table F andTableG beginning on page 20.The estimated gallons of watersoldandsanitarysewerbilledissummarizedin Chart 6 on page 23. The City was not able to provide information on histori- calvolumesoldpertiersoassumptionsweremadeonthe volumessoldpertierinordertopreparethisreportandto project future revenues frombilling of water usage. The report assumes average annual volume of just under 96,000 gallons per residential customer (or approximately 8,000 gallons per month).This volume is pro-rated across theCity’stierstructureusingestimatedhistoricaldata(ac- tual volume data is not available from the City). For com- mercial customers, annual volume is calculated based on prior year estimated volumes adjusted by the percentage increase in commercial and school customers. The report assumesannualsewervolumebillerpercustomerforboth residentialandcommercialof48,000gallons(or4,000gal- lons per month). The MCES reported total sewer volume for the City of nearly 18 million gallons for year 2016. The estimates for residential and commercial customers volume usage for both water and sanitary sewer needs to be revisited and reviewed as better information becomes available from the City’s utility billing system. The estimates for future growth from development, shown in residential equiva- lent units in Chart4andChart5, XBTQSFQBSFECZ$JUZTUBõ The data was provided to Northland as an input for the study and this report. Theestimatesforgrowth,and annual units platted and con- nected, is an important input forestimatingfuturerevenue. Revenue from increased residential equivalent units comes from a one time pay- ment of the City’s availabil- ity charge and connection charge and then from on- going payment for use of the systems. The availabil- ity charge is paid at time of platting and the connection charge at time of connection. The estimated annual gallons of volume will increase as more customers connect to the water and sanitary sewer systems. This report assumes that the average annual usage per customer for residential and commercial remains fairly constant. #BTFEPOIJTUPSJDBMmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODF FTUJNBUFEVUJM JUZSBUFT BOEGVUVSFDBQJUBMQSPKFDUT mOBODJBMQMBOT QSP forma) have been prepared for each the utility funds. KeyAssumptions 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOTGPSFBDIVUJMJUZGVOETXBTEFWFMPQFE based on several key assumptions which are as follows: • Operating expenditures, including personnel costs and materials supplies and all other operating ex- pense will increase by approximately 2.0% annually along with other adjustments as prepared by TKDA, consultant to the City. The City contracted with TKDA to perform a review of the City’s operations for the utility systems and to provide input into future esti- mated capital improvement projects. • Nochangeinexistingtierstructureforfeesandcharg- es. • Depreciation is estimated based on estimated capital improvements with new assets assumed to be depre- ciated over a 40 year term. Information on calculation of net capital assets, including depreciation is includ- ed in the Appendix. • Current capital improvement plan will be implement- ed at estimated project costs and estimated sources of funding as included in this report. This includes an increase in future debt service for payment on bonds to be issued. • Utility fees for use of the system are assumed to in- crease for water and sanitary sewer services, begin- ning inyear 2018, see TableBon page 3 forannualper- centageincreasesforwaterandsewerfeesandthefee adjustment for storm water. The annual rate increase is assumed on the quarterly base fee and usage fees only.The annual fee for storm water is assumed to in- crease by $5.00 per year, beginning in year 2018. • Connection and availability charges are assumed to remain constant for years 2017-2026. Revenue from these charges is used to pay for the system, including the planned capital projects and related debt service. • Theestimatedutilityfeesandchargesareshowntobe at a level that is adequate to maintain cash balances JOUIFGVOETTVöDJFOUUPDPWFSUIFGPMMPXJOHPWFSUIF OFYUmWFZFBST SFTUSJDUFEDBTIGPSQMBOOFEDBQJUBM 2) restricted cash for debt service/calling of bonds; and 3) unrestricted cash available equivalent to 35- 50% of anticipated operating expenses. Fund Description The Water Fund is used to account for the operating and capital improvement costs of the water utility system. Background 5IF8BUFS'VOEJTJOTPVOEmOBODJBMDPOEJUJPO'VUVSF mOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODFXJMMCFJNQBDUFECZUIFUJNJOHPG development of land in the City and the timing of receipt of development fees that will support debt service on the infrastructure and receipt of charges for service for usage of the system. Source of Funds There are two major source of funds: 1) collection of charges for service fees (base fee and volume usage fees) and 2) development fees collected at time of platting and time of connection to the system. Revenue from charges for service fees will increase as the number of customers increases and the volume of water sold increases. 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOBTTVNFTOPDIBOHFJOUIF$JUZTFYJTUJOH rate structure and assumes annual rates increase of 3.0% beginning in year 2018. The City adopted reductions to the2017feeschedule,comparedtoprioryear,resultingin a need to plan for higher increase in the future. Beginning in2017, the City is no longer depositing there- ceipt of revenue from a rental fee for access to the City’s water tower by communication companies to the Water Fund, this represented about a $50,000 reduction in an- nual revenue to theWater Fund. Interest income earned on cash balance is recorded as revenue. The investment earnings rate is estimated to be 0.5% for future years. Special assessments levied for water infrastructure im- provements is recorded as revenue in theWater Fund. Use of Funds The use of funds is to pay for the operation of the water TZTUFN JOUFSFTUBOEmTDBMFYQFOTFPOEFCU EFQSFDJBUJPO  and authorized transfers to other funds that may occur from time to time. Principal payments on bonds sup- ported by the Water Fund result in a reduction of liability for the Fund. Operating expense line item details can be found in TableI-3 on page 28. Transfers 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOEPFTOPUBOUJDJQBUFBOZGVUVSFUSBOTGFST in or out of funds fromtheWater Fund to other city funds. Presently the City does not charge the utility funds for General Fund overhead but does directly charge the fund GPSBENJOJTUSBUJWFTUBõUJNF Balance SheetItems 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOJODMVEFTFTUJNBUFEBTTFUTBOEMJBCJMJUJFT  this includes estimated annual year-end cash balance. Table I-2 on page 27 provides a detailed summary on esti- mated change in cash year by year.The City reported $3.4 million as receivable from other governments (the State of Minnesota) at the end of 2016.This receivable was col- lected in 2017 resulting an increase in cash balance. Estimated year end cash bal- ances are estimated to in- DSFBTFPWFSUIFOFYUmWFZFBST and then will be spent down on debt service and capital projects. The source and use of funds includes depreciation and capital contributions. The dif- ference between the annual source and use of funds is the change in net assets of the GVOE5IFEJõFSFODFDPNFT from the collection of devel- opmentfees(sourceoffunds) for payment of debt service on outstanding bonds (liabil- ity of the fund) and collection of revenue for build-out of the system. Fund Description TheSanitarySewerFundisusedtoaccountfortheoperat- ing and capital improvement costs of the sanitary sewer utility system. Background 5IF4BOJUBSZ4FXFS'VOEJTJOTPVOEmOBODJBMDPOEJUJPO 'VUVSFmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODFXJMMCFJNQBDUFECZUIFUJN ing of future development of land and the timing of re- ceipt of development fees (trunk line availability charges and connection charges) that will support infrastructure costs and receipt of charges for service for usage of the system. Source of Funds There are two major source of funds: 1) collection of charges for service fees (base fee and volume usage fees) and 2) development fees collected at time of platting and time of connection to the system. Revenue from charges for service fees will increase as the number of customers increases and the volume of water sold increases. Future development of land through platting will result in in- creased revenue from water availability and connection charges. 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOBTTVNFTOPDIBOHFJOUIF$JUZTFYJTUJOH rate structure and assumes a rate increase of 1.0% annu- allybeginninginyear2018andthen2.0%annuallybegin- ning in 2024. Interest income is earned on cash balance is recorded as revenue. The investment earnings rate is estimated to be 0.5% for future years. Special assessments levied for sanitary sewer infrastruc- ture improvements is recorded as revenue in the Sanitary Sewer Fund. Use of Funds The use of funds is to pay for the operation of the sanitary TFXFSTZTUFN JOUFSFTUBOEmTDBMFYQFOTFPOEFCU EFQSF ciation, and authorized transfers to other funds that may occur from time to time. Principal payments on bonds supported by the Water Fund result in a reduction of li- ability for the Fund. Operating expense line item details can be found in TableJ-3 on page 33. Transfers 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOEPFTOPUBOUJDJQBUFBOZGVUVSFUSBOTGFST in or out of funds from the Sanitary Sewer Fund to other city funds. Presently the City does not charge the utility funds forGeneralFund overheadbut does directlycharge UIFGVOEGPSBENJOJTUSBUJWFTUBõUJNF Balance SheetItems 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOJODMVEFTFTUJNBUFEBTTFUTBOEMJBCJMJUJFT for, this includes estimated annual year-end cash balance. TableJ-2 on page 32 provides a detailed summary on esti- mated change in cash year by year. Estimated year end cash bal- ance is estimated to increase betweenyears2016and2020 due to development. The actual year-end cash balance will be impacted by changes in planned capital spending. As projects are im- plemented, beyond what is included in the CIP, cash bal- ance may be lower than what is estimated in this report. The source and use of funds includes depreciation and capital contributions. The dif- ference between the annual source and use of funds is the change in net assets. The EJõFSFODFDPNFTGSPNUIF collection of development fees (source of funds) for pay- ment of debt service on out- standing bonds (liability of the fund) and collection of revenue for build-out of the system. Fund Description TheStormWaterFundisusedtoaccountfortheoperating and capital improvement costs of the storm water utility system. Background 5IF4UPSN8BUFS'VOEJTJOTPVOEmOBODJBMDPOEJUJPO'V UVSFmOBODJBMQFSGPSNBODFXJMMCFJNQBDUFECZUIFUJNJOH of future development oflandinthe City. Future develop- ment will increasethe demands onthestormwaterutility infrastructure and provide opportunity for increased rev- enue to support the infrastructure and operation of the system. Source of Funds 5IFSFJTPOFNBKPSTPVSDFPGGVOE UIFDPMMFDUJPOPGBmYFE annual charge for service fee. The City does not charge an availability fee for the storm water utility system. Build out ofthe systemhas been paid as part of the developer’s project costs. Theannualfee,presentlyat$50.00,isassumedtoincrease by $5.00 per year beginning in 2018 and then by $10.00 peryearbeginningin2021.An increaseisneededinorder to maintain cash balance. Beginning in 2017, the City will begin paying debt service on bonds issued in 2016. Some cities choose to manage storm water utility fees UISPVHImOBODJOHDFSUBJODBQJUBMJNQSPWFNFOUTXJUIUBY levy, the City will have the ability in the future to consid- er what costs, if any, of the storm water utility should be spread over the cities entire tax base. Interest incomeis earnedonthecashbalanceandrecord- ed as revenue. The investment earnings rate is estimated to be 0.5% for future years. Special assessments levied and recorded as revenue to the StormWater Fund relate to unpaid utility bills and are not related to project costs. Use of Funds The use of funds is to pay for the operation of the storm XBUFSTZTUFN JOUFSFTUBOEmTDBMFYQFOTFPOEFCU EFQSF ciation, and authorized transfers to other funds that may occur from time to time. Principal payments on bonds supported by the Storm Water Fund result in a reduction of liability for the Fund. Operating expense line item de- tails can be found in TableK-3 on page 38. Transfers 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOEPFTOPUBOUJDJQBUFBOZGVUVSFUSBOTGFST in or out of funds fromthe StormWater Fund to other city funds. Presently the City does not charge the utility funds for General Fund overhead but does directly charge the GVOEGPSBENJOJTUSBUJWFTUBõUJNF Balance SheetItems 5IFmOBODJBMQMBOJODMVEFTFTUJNBUFEBTTFUTBOEMJBCJMJUJFT for, this includes estimated annual year-end cash balance. TableK-2 on page 37 provides a detailed summary on esti- mated change in cash year by year. Estimated year end cash bal- ance is estimated to decline due to the increase in debt service expense. Cash bal- ancesareexpectedtorecover dueto theestimatedincrease intheannualstormwaterfee. The actual year-end cash balance will be impacted by changes in planned capital spending. As projects are implemented, beyond what is included in the CIP, cash balances may be lower than what is estimated in this re- port. The source and use of funds includes depreciation. The EJõFSFODFCFUXFFOUIFBO nual source and use of funds is the change in net assets. 5IFEJõFSFODFDPNFTGSPN the collection of charges and payment of debt service on outstanding bonds (liability of the fund). The increase in cash is due to thecollectionofchargesfrom development to pay for debt JTTVFEUPmOBODFDBQJUBMJN provement projects. The CIP anticipates the is- suance of additional debt in the future to pay for capi- tal improvements. Chart 13 includes both existing and anticipated issuance of new debt. The estimated future re- stricted cash balance for debt service as a percent of year- end debt outstanding will in- crease as cash increases from the collection of develop- mentfees. Thecashcollected will be used to pay future debt service. Northland Securities, Inc.45 South 7th Street, Suite 2000Minneapolis, MN 55402(800) 851-2920Member NASD and SIPC