Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
05-02-17 CCMP
1111 LI I 1 ( Our Missioll is 1)rovirie PuNic Sorices in a .1'isca/y .R esponfible nillner 1)reseivillg Oren Space Chaizicier NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, May 2, 2017 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo I 3800 Laverne Avenue North AGENDA A. Call to Order/Pledge ofAllegiance nce B. Approval of Agenda C. Approval of Minutes 1, April 4, 2017; April 11, 2017; April 18, 2017 D. Public Comments/Inquires E. Presentations F. Consent Agenda 2. Approve Payments of Disbursements and Payroll 3. Approve 2018 Budget Schedule G. Regular Agenda 4. CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) — Public improvement and Final Assessment Hearing — Resolution 20 1 7-0xx 5. 1-94 Lift Station and Sanitary Sewer Improvements — Accept Bids and Award Contract 6. Royal Golf Preliminary Plat Discussion 7. Royal Golf Grading Permit s. Noise Ordinance 9. Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat to. VMX Rezoning (Zoning Map Amendment) 1. V-LDR/VMX Zoning Text Amendment H. Council Reports 1. Staff Reports and Announcements J. Adjourn oit" 'n)'v` City of Lake Elmo Public comment sheet If you wish to address the City Council, a Commission, or Committee, please fill out the form and give it to the City Clerk orCity Administrator. The Mayor / Chair will call upon you when it is time for you to speak during the time designated for public comments oneach agenda item. If your topic is not a numbered item on the agenda, it will be heard during the Public Comments and Inquiries portion ofthe meeting. *** Decorum Policies *** (1) Conduct oneself with respect and civility towards others and otherwise abide byCouncil, Commissions, and Committee policy, Please refrain from conversations with others during the meeting, and shouting from the audience will not be allowed. Being quiet during the meeting is appreciated so that the business of the governing body can beconducted with full attention tothe matter athand; (Z) The governing body will provide (2) opportunities for public comment during the meeting. Rot, an opportunity will be given at the onset of the meeting for general comment; Second, opportunity will be given to speak on an agenda item at the time the governing body addresses the item; (3) Citizens wishing tospeak mustsigminandpmvidetheireque$tnthe[oundl,Commbdon,or[ommittee Clerk for distribution to the Mayor / Chair. Upon being recognized, you should proceed to the lectern and state your name, address and topic tubudiscussed. You will begiven (5)minutes tuspeak. The Mayor/Chair may interrupt o, terminate a citizen's statement when it is too lengthy, personal, insulting, abusive, obscene, or slanderous. Any person acting in an unruly manner may be asked to leave the meeting. (4) No person shall display signs or placards, applaud participants in debate or engage in conversation or other behavior which may disrupt the proceedings of the Council. (S) When o group of persons wishes to address the Council on the same subject matter, they may choose a spokesperson to address the governing body. No action will be taken in response to a petition delivered at a Council meeting, Petitions will be placed an file and referred to the appropriate staff for consideration and recommendation ofappropriate action, Name (please phnA: Address: Itenn#/Topic: ' r- CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 4, 2017 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pin. PRESENT: Mayor Mike Pearson and Councilmembers Justin Bloyer, Julie Fliflet, Jill Lundgren and Christine Nelson Staff present: Administrator Handt, City Attorney Sonsalla, City Engineer Griffin, City Planner Becker, Public Works Director Weldon, and City Clerk Johnson. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item 3, "Approve Met Council SAC Deferral Agreements" and Item 9, "Approve Pebble Park Free Library" were moved to the Regular Agenda. Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilinember Fliflet, moved TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. Motion passed 5 — O. ACCEPT MINUTES Minutes of the March 7, 2017 Regular Meeting were accepted as presented. (Lundgren — abstain PUBLIC commENTs/iNoulmEs None PRESENTATIONS None CONSENT AGENDA 2. Approve Payment of Disbursements 4. Approve Special Assessment Abatement for 3459 Lake Elmo Avenue 5. MSAS System Revisions — Resolution Approving Designation of 5th Street North as MSAS Route 6. Old Village Phase 3 Street & Utility Improvements — Approve Plans & Specs; Authorize Ad for Bids 7. 2017 Street Improvements — Approve Plans & Specs; Authorize Ad for Bids 8. Approve Rain Garden Maintenance Agreement 10. Approve Purchase of Two % Ton Pickup Trucks 11. Approve Comp Plan Amendment to City's Wastewater Facilities and Land Use Plans 12. Approve Selection of Firm for Space Needs Study LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 4, 2017 Councilmember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Motion passed 5 - O. ITEM 13: Prosecuting Attorney Councilmember Bloyer, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, moved TO APPOINT JOHNSON TURNER AS CITY ATTORNEY FOR PROSECUTION SERVICES EFFECTIVE MAY I, 2017. Motion passed 3 — 2. (Fliflet, Lundgren — nay) Councilmember Fliflet stated she did not support the motion because Johnson Turner Attorney Dave Snyder is Mayor Pearson's first cousin. ITEM 14: Inwood 5'1' Addition Final Plat and PUD Plans City Planner Becker presented the request for approval of the 511' and final phase of the Inwood development. Becker reviewed 1011' Street right of way and trail issues, and plat changes recommended by the City Engineer. Planning Commission and staff recommendations were also reviewed. John Rask, M/I Homes, spoke on behalf of the developer regarding removing the berm, loss of landscaping and impacts to the neighborhood. Rask also pointed out discrepancies in the staff report and requested changes to conditions 9 and 11. Councilmember Nelson, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2017-029 (b) APPROVING THE INWOOD 57-11 ADDITION FINAL PLAT AND FINAL PUD PLANS AS RECOMMENDED BY STAFF. Motion passed 4 — 0 — 1. (Bloyer — present/not voting) ITEM 15: Savona Neighborhood Park City Planner Becker presented the recommendations of the Park Commission for development of Savona Park Phase 1. Councilmember Bloyer, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO APPROVE FUNDING FOR PHASE 1 OF SA VONA PARK FOR THE INSTALLATION OF RECOMMENDED PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT, HALF BASKETBALL COURT, BASKETBALL HOOP, WOOD MULCH SURFACING, AS WELL AS SITE GRADING, NOT TO EXCEED $150,000. Motion passed 5— O. ITEM 16: CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) — Approve Feasibility Report and Call Public Improvement and Final Assessment Hearing Page 2 of 5 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 4, 2017 City Engineer Griffin presented the feasibility report for proposed improvements to CSAH 13, reviewed the phasing plan, construction plans, estimated costs, and proposed assessments. Griffin also presented changes in estimated costs for the project resulting in lower costs than originally anticipated. Councilmember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2017-34 RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE CSAH 13 (IDEAL A VENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2017 WITH DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REVISE THE ASSESSMENTS USING UPDATED COST ESTIMATES. Motion passed 5 — O. Councilmember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2017-035 DECLARING COST TO BE ASSESSED AND CALLING HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT FOR THE CSAH 13 (IDEAL A VENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS TO BE HELD ON MAY 2, 2017 WITH DIRECTION TO STAFF TO REVISE THE ASSESSMENTS USING UPDATED COST ESTIMATES. Motion passed 5 — O. ITEM 17: Appointments to Comp Plan Advisory Committee City Administrator Handt reviewed prior action and list of applicants for the Cominittee. Councilmember Bloyer, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, moved TO APPOINT KATHY WEEKS, BARBARA BIRSCHBACH, MADISON BERGMANN AND BROOKE KNOLL TO THE COMP PLAN ADVISIORY COMMITTEE. Councilmember Lundgren, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO AMEND THE MOTION TO ADD SUSAN DUNN, GEORGE JOHNSON AND NEIL KRUEGER TO THE APPOINTMENTS. Motion on the amendment failed 2 — 3. (Pearson, Bloyer, Nelson — nay). Primary motion passed 3 — 2. (Fliflet, Lundgren —nay) ITEM 3: Approve Met Council SAC Deferral Agreements Councilmember Lundgren asked if the City Attorney has reviewed the Agreements. City Attorney Sonsalla stated she had discussed the Agreements with City Administrator Handt. Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Bloyer, moved TO APPROVE THE MET COUNCIL SAC DEFERRAL AGREEMENTS FOR BUSINESS AND RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES. Motion passed 5 — O. Page 3 of 5 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 4, 2017 ITEM 9: Approve Pebble Park Free Library Councilmember Fliflet asked who is donating the Pebble Park Free Library and thanked them for their efforts. Councilmember Lundgren, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO APPROVE A RESIDENT ERECTING A FREE LIBRARY WITHIN PEBBLE PARK SUBJECT TO THE RESIDENT SUBMITTING TO THE CITY A SIGNED DONATION FORM FREEING THE CITY OF LIABILITY AND MAINTENANCE RESPONSIBILITY. Motion passed 5 — O. COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pearson: Thanked resident Virginia Pleban for bringing flowerpots to City Hall. Councilmember Nelson: Attended construction open house held by Washington County. Councilmember Lundgren: Reported on work with the Farmers Market group. Councilmember Bloyer: Corrunented on Council communications with developers. Councilmember Fliflet: Thanked staff for work on the Savona Park project. STAFF REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Administrator Handt: Reported on Environmental Committee, Arbor Day Tree Giveaway, Clean-up Day, Library negotiations introduced Sergeant Osterman. City Clerk Johnson: Reported on upcoming HR Corrunittee Meeting. City Attorney Sonsalla: Currently working on hazardous property abatement, Library negotiations, and will be speaking at the LMC conference. City Engineer Griffin: Working on various plan reviews. Councilmember Fliflet, seconded by Mayor Pearson, moved TO ADJOURN TO CLOSED SESSION AT 8:20 P.M. PURSUANT TO MN STAT. 13D.03, TO CONSIDER STRATEGIES FOR LABOR NEGOTIATIONS, INCLUDING NEGOTIATION STRATEGIES OR DEVELOPMENT OR DISCUSSION OF LABOR -NEGOTIATION PROPOSALS. Motion passed 5 — O. Closed session held. Page 4 of 5 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 4, 2017 Councilnzember Bloyer, seconded by Councilmentber Lundgren, moved TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION. Motion passed 5 — O. Mayor Pearson stated that the Council met in closed session and discussed labor negotiations. Meeting adjourned at 9:05 pm. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk Mike Pearson, Mayor Page 5 of 5 C TY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING MINUTES APRIL 11, 2017 CALL TO ORDER Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 5:30 p.m. PRESENT: Mayor Mike Pearson and Councihnembers Justin Bloyer, Julie Fliflet, Jill Lundgren and Christine Nelson. ABSENT: None. Staff present: Administrator Handt, Engineer Griffin and Attorney Jim Thomson Councihnember Lundgren, seconded by Councihnember Fliflet, moved TO ENTER CLOSED SESSION. Motion passed 5 — O. Closed session held to discuss the City's pending lawsuit in federal court againt 3M. Councihnember Moyer, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO RETURN TO OPEN SESSION. Motion passed 5 — O. Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Bloyer, moved TO ADJOURN THE MEETING. Motion passed 5 — O. Meeting adjourned at 6:25 p.m. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ATTEST: Mike Pearson, Mayor Julie Johnson, City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2017 CALL TO ORDER/PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:00 pm. PRESENT: Mayor Mike Pearson and Councilmembers Justin Bloyer, Julie Fliflet, Jill Lundgren and Christine Nelson ((It -rived at 7.-03) Staff present: Administrator Handt, City Attorney Sonsalla, City Engineer Griffin, Planning Director Wensman, Public Works Director Weldon, Finance Director Swanson, Sergeant Osterman and City Clerk Johnson. APPROVAL OF AGENDA Item 18, "Sally Manzara Nature Center" was moved to the end of the Regular Agenda. Item 10, "Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual" was moved to the end of the Regular Agenda and Item 13, "Approve Finance Committee Appointments" was moved to the beginning of the Regular Agenda. C01111Citillember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO APPROVE THE AGENDA AS AMENDED. Motion passed 4 — O. (Nelson — absent) ACCEPT MINUTES Minutes of the April 4, 2017 Regular Meeting were tabled to the next meeting. PUBLIC CONIMENTS/INOUIRIES None PRESENTATIONS None CONSENT AGENDA 2. Approve Payment of Disbursements 3. Accept March 2017 Assessor's Report 4. Accept March 2017 Building Department Report 5. Accept March 2017 Fire Department Report 6. Accept March 2017 Public Works Department Report 7. Approve Hiring Lead Worker S. Appoint Representative to Fire Relief Association 9, 2017 Crack Seal Project — Accept Quotes and Award Contract 11. CSAH 14 County Signal Maintenance Agreements — Approve Revised MnDOT Agreements 12. Authorize Advertising for Public Works Operator 14. Approve Agreement for Monitoring of Outdoor Warning Siren Equipment 15. Approve Bremer Bank Service Center Easement Vacations — 8555 Eagle Point Blvd. N. 16. Approve Professional Services Agreement with BKV Group for Space Needs Assessment Councilmember Lundgren, seconded by Councilmember Fliflet, moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Motion passed 5-0. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2017 ITEM 13: Approve Finance Committee Appointments Councilmen:her Fliflet, seconded by Councihnember Lundgren, moved TO APPOINT TERRY FORREST AND ANNE COHEN TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. Motion passed 3 — 2. (Bloyer, Nelson — nay) Anne Smith, 12153 Marquess Lane N., spoke against the appointment of Wally Nelson to the Finance Committee. Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Bloyer, moved TO APPOINT WALLY NELSON TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE. Motion passed 3 — 2. (Fliflet, Lundgren — nay) ITEM 17: 2017A Bondin Tammy Omdahl, Northland Securities, provided an overview of the Finance Plan for Issuance of $9,880,000 General Obligation Bonds. Councilmember Lundgren, seconded by Councihnember Fliflet, moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION 2017-037: A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING ISSUANCE AND SALE OF 89,880,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2017A. Motion passed 5 — 0. ITEM 19: Planning Commission Ordinance City Administrator Handt stated that the proposed Ordinance changes were prepared following Council discussions at the March 14, 2017 workshop. Councihnember Bloyer, seconded by Councihnember Nelson, moved TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 08-172 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE CITY'S PROVISIONS RELATED TO THE PLANNING COMMISSION. Councihnember Fliflet, seconded by Councilmember Lundgren, moved TO AMEND THE PRIMARY MOTION TO ADD THAT THE 4/5THS LANGUAGE REMAIN IN THE ORDINANCE. Motion failed 2 — 3. (Pearson, Bloyer, Nelson — nay) Primary motion passed 3 — 2. (Fliflet, Lundgren — nay) ITEM 20: Library Negotiations Update Administrator Handt provided an update summarizing a draft Resolution provided to the City Council. Handt added that the Library Board will hold a special meeting on May 3, 2017, 6:30 p.m. to discuss the future of the Library and it is anticipated a recommendation will be forwarded to the City Council for consideration at the May 16, 2017 Council meeting. ITEM 18: Sally Manzara Nature Center Pa 2 of 4 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2017 City Administrator Handt reported on updates made to the proposed agreement, including an update to Exhibit B and removal of the camera policy that was tabled by the Parks Cornmission. Tony Manzara and Connie Kirk spoke on behalf of the Friends of Lake Elmo's Sunfish Lake Park regarding features and benefits of the project and community support for the nature center. Councilmember Lundgren, seconded by Councilntember Bloyer, moved TO APPROVE THE SALLY MANZARA NATURE CENTER DEVELOPMENT, LEASE, LICENSE AND OPERATING AGREEMENT. Motion passed 5 — O. ITEM 10: Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual City Administrator Handt explained that the proposed revisions have been reviewed by the Planning Commission. City Engineer Griffin added that the standards in the manual are to be used in addition to the City's ordinances. Mayor Pearson, seconded by Councilmember Nelson, MOVED TO APPROVE THE MARCH 2017 REVISIONS TO THE ENGINEERING DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL AND THE NEW LANDSCAPE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION STANDARDS MANUAL. Motion passed 4 — 0 — 1. (Lundgren — present/not voting) COUNCIL REPORTS Mayor Pearson: Met with the Tartan Park developer, met with Lennar representatives regarding Savona Park. Councilmember Nelson: Met with Public Works Director Weldon and toured the Public Works facilities. Councilmember Lundgren: Working on preparations for the farmers market. Councilmember Bloyer: No report Councilmember Fliflet: Working on Library Issues. STAFF REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Administrator Handt: Attended Washington County Economic Development meeting; working on scheduling an EDA meeting for May 11'11; Environmental Committee meeting April 24'1'; attended transit summit at Washington County, working on Verizon cell tower and data for space needs study. City Clerk Johnson: No report City Attorney Sonsalla: Reviewed space needs study; working on a hazardous building matter and plat review Planning Director Wensman: Working on development review, comp plan update committee, and Savona Park punch list items. City Engineer Griffin: Bid opening Thursday, April 20'11 for the 1-94 Lift Station contract. Page 3 of 4 Meeting adjourned at 8:15 pm. ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES APRIL 18, 2017 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor Page 4 of 4 THE' ur. L\KE ELMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: / ITh )7; P DATE: May 2 CONSENT ITEM #2 MOTION Approve Disbursements in the amount of $262,908.52 Brian Swanson, Finance Director Kristina Handt, City Administrator Kristina Handt, City Administrator FISCAL IMPACT: $262,908.52 017 SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $262,908.52. No specific motion is needed as this is recommended to be part of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION/STAFF REPORT: The City of Lake Elmo has the fiduciary responsibility to conduct normal business operations. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # ACH ACH ACH DD 7782-DD7829 45781-45817 TOTAL Amount $ 14,152.87 $ 7,676.16 $ 1,000.00 $ 33,516.83 $ 206,562.66 Description Payroll Taxes to IRS & MN Dept of Revenue 04/27/17 Payroll Retirement to PERA 04/27/17 Payroll Retirement to MDCP 04/27/17 Payroll (Direct Deposits) 04/27/17 Accounts Payable 05/02/17 -- pave 1 -- City Council Meeting March 21. 2017 [Consent Agenda Item 2] RECOMMENDATION: Based on the aforementioned, the staff recommends the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda the aforementioned disbursements in the amount of $262,908.52. ATTACHMENTS: . Accounts Payable — check register Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: Amy Printed: 04/27/2017 - 2:30 PM Batch: 002-05-2017 Invoice # Inv Date ADVAUTO Advanced Aulo Parts 2055-406627 04/17/2017 I 01-430-3100-42210 Equipment Parts 2055-406627 Total: 2055-406750 04/18/2017 101-450-5200-42210 Equipment Parts 2(155-406750 04/18/2017 I (11-430-3100-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 2055-406750 Total: ADVAUTO Total: AM ERICAN American Eng and Testing, Inc. 96078 04/12/20 I 7 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 96078 Total: AMERICAN Total: ANItv1ALHU Animal Humane Society 12224 04/21/2017 101-420-2700-43 I 50 Contract Services 12224 Total: AN I MALHU Total: BAYPRIN Bayport Printing House 1327-17 04/710017 206-450-5300-42500 Library Collection Maintenance 1327-17 Total: BAYPRIN Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference 63.06 0.00 05/02/2017 Water Pump 63.06 9.30 0.00 05/02/2017 V-Belt (Cushman) 44.08 0.00 05/02/2017 Motor Oil 53.38 116.44 6,845.93 0 0(1 05/02/2017 2016.133 OV PH3 Geotechnical Inv 6,845.93 6,845.93 75.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Animal Impound Fees 010117-033117 75.00 75.00 1,483.00 1,483.00 1,433.00 0.00 05/02/2017 NYT Subscription Task Type P() # Close POLine # No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 1 Invoice Inv Date BOLTONME Bolton & Menk, Inc 0201950 04/12/2017 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering Services 0201950 Total: 0201952 04/12/2017 803-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 0201952 Total: BOLTONME Total: BOYER Boyer Trucks 1128405X1 04/26/2017 101-430-3120-42210 Equipment Parts 1128405X1 Total: BOYER Total: Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task "Fype PO # Close POLine # 7,361.73 0.00 05/02/2017 1-94 Lift Station Design Phase No 0000 7,361.73 656,50 0.00 05/02/2017 Royal Golf Design Svs 2016.125 No 0000 656.50 8,018.23 44.10 0,00 05/02/2017 Switch 1986 Plow Truck 44.10 44,10 No 0000 CAPRA Capra's Utilities Inc. 4439 04/19/2017 2,800.00 0,00 05/02/2017 SW CONN Library No 0000 206-450-5300-44030 Repairs/is/I aint Imp Not Bldgs 4439 Total: 2,800.00 CAPRA Total: 2,800.00 CENCOLLE Century College 642902 (14/12/2(117 868.00 0,00 05/02/2017 Basic Auto Ex x 4 No 0000 101-420-222(1-44371) Conferences & Training 642902 Total: S68.00 CENCOLLE Total: 868,00 CENTURYL CenturyLink 20170419 04/19/2017 187.53 0,00 05/02/2017 Phone 0419-0518 No 0000 206-450-5300-43210 Telephone 2(1170419 04/19/2017 50.64 0.00 05/02/2017 Internet 0419-05 I 8 No 0000 206-450-5300-43250 Internet 20170419 Total: 238.17 CENTURYL Total: 238.17 CINTAS Cintas Corporation #754 754715749 04/12/2017 101-430-3 I 0(1-44170 Uniforms 754715749 Total: 754718385 04/19/2017 101-430-3100-44170 Uniforms AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:3)) PM) 131.10 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 Uniforms No 0000 131.10 130,63 0.00 05/02/2017 Uniforms No 0000 Page 2 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity hut Date Description Reference Task Type l'O tt Close POLine # 754718385 Total: 130,63 7547206102 04/25/2017 I 06.68 0,00 05/02/2017 Cleaning & Taint Supplies No ONO 101-410-1940-44010 RepairFJM aint Contractual Bldg 7547206102 Total: 106.68 CINTAS Total: 368.41 COLEM ER Colemer Jamie 20170426 04/26/2017 45.00 0.00 05/02/2017 SW Cert - J Colemer No 0000 602-495-9450-44370 Conferences & Training 20170426 Total: 45.00 COLEM ER Total: 45.00 CTYOAKDA City of Oakdale 201704185634 04/18/2017 I 01-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 201704135634 Total: CTYOAKDA Total: 2,41 1.26 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 E2 Repair Battery Comp & 2,41 1,26 2,41 1.26 CUSH Cuslunan Motor Co., Inc. 170446 04/19/2017 19.96 0.00 05/02/2017 Cushman parts 101-450-5200-42210 Equipment Parts I 70446 Total: 19.96 CUSH Total: 19.96 DEGREE DeGree Tom 201 70426 04/26/2017 2(16-450-5300-42000 Office Supplies 20170426 Total: DEGREE Total; DELTA Delta Dental Of Minnesota 39530213 04/15/20 I 7 I 01-000-0000-21706 Medical insurance 39530213 Total: DELTA Total: I , 1 60.03 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 Postage I , I 60.03 1,160.03 1,844.80 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 May 2017 Premium 1 ,844.80 1,844.80 DPCINDUS DPC Industries, Inc. 0E82000029-1 7 03/3 1/2017 20.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Chlorine 60 I -494-9400-42 160 Chemicals DE82000029- I 7 Total: 20.00 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 AP - To (3e Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 pm) Page 3 Invoice # Inv Dale Amount Quantity DPCINDUS Total: 20.00 ate Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine E.G.RUD E.G, R tic! & Sons, Inc. 34581 04/12/2017 3,792.50 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 Land Survey (SaIns/Thompson Prop 101-420-2400-44300 Miscellaneous Disp) 34581 Total: 3,792.50 E.G.RUD Total: 3,792.50 GREATAM Great America Financial 20510116 04/17/2017 I 01-410-1940-44040 Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt 20510 I 16 Total: GREATAM Total: GUSTAF Gustafson Richard 20170424 04/27/2017 601-494-9400-44370 Conferences & Training 20170424 04/27/2017 602-495-9450-414370 Conferences & Training 20170424 Total: GUSTAF Total: 664.29 0,00 05/02/2017 Copier Maintenance 664.29 664.29 23.00 0,00 05/02/2017 WA Cert - R Gustafson 45,00 0.00 05/02/2017 SW Cert - R Gustafson 68.00 68.00 HANDT Handt Kristina 20 I 7(/427 04/27/20)7 109.27 0.00 05/02/2017 M ileage & Parking 101-410-1320-43310 Mileage 2017(1427 04/27/2017 23,56 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 Mileage 206-450-5300-433 I 0 Mileage 20170427 Total: 132.83 HANDT Total: 132.83 I IP Fir Inc. 58398934 04/19/201 7 151.00 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 New Monitor - Finance Director 101-410-1520-42000 Office Supplies 58398934 Total: 151.00 HP Total: 151.00 HYDRO Hydrometliods 201609504 04/06/20 I 7 720.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Bremer Bank Svs Center Expansion 803-490-9070-43040 Legal Services 201609504 Total: 720,00 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) No 000(1 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No (11100 No 000(1 No 0000 No 11000 Page 4 Invoice Inv Date HYDRO Total: 1NNOV AT Innovative Office Solutions 1N1573768 04/11/2017 101-420-2400-42000 Office Supplies 1N1573768 Total: 1NNOVAT Total; kathfuel Kalil Fuel Oil Service Co 586921 04/14/2017 101-430-3100-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 586921 Total: 587172 04/13/2017 101-430-3100-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 587172 Total: 587174 (14/13/2017 101-430-3100-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 587174 Total: 587192 04/27/2017 101-430-3100-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 587192 Total: ath fuel Total: Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 720.00 38.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Buisness Cards - M. Bent No 0000 38.00 38.00 840.73 0.00 05/02/2017 Fuel No 0000 840.73 613.12 0.00 05/02/2f/I 7 Fuel No 0000 613,12 574.38 0.00 05/02/2017 Fuel No 0000 574.38 883.36 0.00 05/02/2017 Fuel No 0000 883.36 2,911.59 KENG RAVE Kennedy & Graven. Chartered 136891 04/25/20 17 3,392.85 0.00 05/02/2017 Civil matters No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 930.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Library No ONO 206-450-5300-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 16,582.94 0.00 05/02/2017 3M Litigaiton No 0000 101-4 I 0-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 92.50 0.00 05/02/2017 Haz Bldg - 9240 31st St No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 (14/25/2017 193.75 0.00 05/02/2017 Nature Center No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/201 7 418.50 0,00 05/02/2017 Union Contract Negotiations No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 53.75 0.00 05/02/2017 Boulder Ponds 2 No 0000 803-000-0000-22910 Developer Payments 136891 04/25/2017 934.71 0.00 05/02/2017 Condemnation of Danielson Ppty No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 1,503.88 0.00 05102/2017 Royal Golf No 0000 803-000-0000-22910 Developer Payments Al' - To I3e Paid Proof List (04/27/(7 - 2:30 PM) Page 5 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine 136891 04/25/2017 62,00 0.00 05/02/2017 Personnel Matters No 0000 101-41(1-132(1-43(14(1 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 92,50 0.00 05/02/2017 Zuleger VS City of LE No 0000 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 136891 04/25/2017 53.75 0.00 05/02/2017 Inwood 4th No 0000 803-000-0000-22910 Developer Payments 136891 04/25/2017 4,7(11.54 0.00 05/02/2017 Inwood 5th No 0000 803-000-0000-229 I 0 Developer Payments 13689) Total: 29,012.67 KENGRAVE Total: 29,012.67 KINGK King Kassidy 20170426KK 0406/2(1)7 1() 1 -4 I 0-1450-43620 Cable Operations 20170426KK 04/26/2017 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 20170426K.K. 04/26/201 7 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 20 I 70426KK 04/26/201 7 101-4 I 0-1450-43620 Cable Operations 20170426KK Total: KINGK Total: 55.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper Park Comm 041717 No 0000 55.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper Plan Ccmun 04/24/17 No 0000 25.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper Bonus 04/24/17 hours No Of MO 55.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper En vim Comm 04/24/17 No 0000 I 90.00 I 90.00 LEAGMN League of' M N Cities 753200 04/26/20 I 7 150,00 0.00 05/02/2017 LMC Annual Conf- C. Nelson No 0000 101-410-1 I 10-44370 Conferences & Training 253200 04/26/20 I 7 400.00 0.00 05/02/20 17 LMC Annual Conf- K. Handt No 0000 101-410-1320-44370 Conferences (Psc Training 253200 Total: 550.00 LEAGMN Total: 550.00 LEASSOC Lake Elmo Associates, LLP May-17 05/01/2017 2,666.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Rent - May 20 I 7 No 0000 I 01-410-1940-44120 Rentals - Building May-17 Total: 2,666.00 LEASSOC Total: 2,666.00 Lillie Newspapers Inc. Lillie Suburban 2(170331 03/31/2017 36.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Legal Publications No 0000 101-410-1910-43510 Legal Publishing 2070331 Total: 36.00 AP - To Be Paid Proor List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) Page 6 Invoice # lnv Date Lillie Total: LMCIT League oF MN Cities Ins. Trust 10003136-2017 03/29/2017 101-410-1320-43610 Insurance 10003136-20 I 7 03/29/2017 101-420-2220-43630 Vehicle Insurance I 0003136-201 7 03/29/20 I 7 101-420-2400-43630 Insurance I 0003136-2017 03/29/20 I 7 I 01-430-3100-43630 Insurance 10003 [36-2017 (13/29/2017 101-450-5200-43630 Insurance I 0003136-2017 (13/29/2017 21)6-450-531)0-43630 hisui ance 10(103136-2017 03/29/2017 601 -494-9400-436 I 0 Insurance 10003136-20 I 7 03/29/2017 607-495-9450-43610 Insurance 10003136-2017 Total: LMCIT Total: ARONEYS Maroney's Sanitation, Inc 0000673310 04/11/2017 101-410-1940-43340 Refuse 0000673310 04/11/2017 101-420-2220-43840 Retbse 0000673310 04/11/2017 101-430-3100-43840 Refuse 0000673310 04/11/2() I 7 101-420-2220-43840 Rellise 0000673310 04/11/2017 206-450-5300-43840 Re6use 0(100673310 Total: i\IARONEYS Total: ENARDSO Menards - Oakdale 28095 04/17/2017 601-494-9400-43820 Water Utility 28095 Total: MENARDSO Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 36.00 27,129.50 7,571.45 184.87 15,688.20 3,197,87 1,700.20 9.321,51 603,40 65,397,00 65,397,00 121.72 50,77 221,17 231.04 50.88 675.58 675,58 40.21 40.21 40.21 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 Ins - Admin 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 0.00 05/02/2017 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 Ins - Fire Ins - Bldg Ins - PW 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 lns - Parks 0.00 05/02/2017 Ins - Lib 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 Iris' - Water 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 Ins - Sewer 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 05/02/2017 05/02)2017 05/02/2017 05/02/2017 Trash Pick Up - City Hall Trash Pick Up - Fire Trash Pick Up - PW Trash Pick Up - Fire Trash Pick Up - Library 0,00 05/02/2017 Well # 1 Repairs for chlorine sys No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Pape 7 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO if Close POLine # MERCURY Mercury Electric 7814 02/06/2017 I (II-450-5200-44030 Repair/Min) Imp Not Bldgs 7814 Total: M ERCURY Total: M I NG ERCO Minger Construction Inc 414 04/24/2017 602-495-9450-44030 Repairs \ Maint Imp Not Bldgs 414 Total: M INGERCO Total: MNHEALTH MN Dcpartement of Health 20170426 04/26/2017 601-494-9400-44300 Miscellaneous 20170426 Total: MNI'IEALTH Total: MPCA MN Pollution Control Agency 201 70426 04/26/20 17 602-495-9450-44300 Miscellaneous Expenses 20170426 Total: MPCA Total: P ERA P ERA 110061 04/1 0/2017 101-410-1520-44300 Miscellaneous 110061 Total: P E RA Total: SACHSJIM James Sachs 2017(1424 04/24/20 )7 601-494-9400-44370 Conferences & 'Training 20170424 Total: SACHSJIM Total: SCH LON,' I( A Schlontka Services LLC 19683 03/02/2017 101-430-3100-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 19683 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27(17 - 2:30 PM) 767.78 0.00 05/)12/201 7 %Wield Light Repair (7/16) 767.78 767.78 29,584.03 0.00 05/02/2017 Lake Elmo Ave SW Forcemain Repair 29,584.03 29,584,03 150.00 0.00 05/02/2017 OV Phase 3 WA Main Replacement Pennit Fc 150.00 150.00 310.00 0.00 05/02/2017 OV Phase 3 SW Extension Permit Fee 310.00 310.00 10.00 0,00 05/02/2017 P ERA Fee 10.00 10,00 23.00 0.00 05/02/2017 WA Ccrt J Sachs 23.00 23.00 250.00 0,00 05/02/2017 Septic plumping @ PW 250.00 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No MOO No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 8 invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # SCHLOMKA Total: 250.00 SELECTAC Select Account 11804539 04/04/201 7 I 2,66 0.00 05/02/2017 Participant Fee 040117-043017 No 0000 101-410-1520-43150 Contract Services 11894539 Total: I 2.66 SELECTAC Total: I 2.66 SHORTELL Short Elliot Flenderickson, Inc 330310 04/06/20 I 7 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 330310 Total: 330443 U4/10/2017 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 330443 Total: SHORTELL Total: SPRINT Sprint 761950227-169 04/18/20 17 101-410-1940-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 04/18/201 7 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 04/18/2017 101-420-2400-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 04/18/20 I 7 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 04/18/2017 I 01-450-5200-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 04/18/2017 1(11-410-1910-43210 Telephone 761950227-169 Total: SPRINT Total: STILLMED Stillwater Medical Group 686131 04/11/2017 101-420-2220-43050 Physicals 686131 Total: STILLMED Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:3)) I'M) 32,881.14 0.00 05/02/2017 OV Phase 3 2016.133 Plans & Specs No ONO 32,831.14 357.50 0.00 05/02/2017 2015.130 Inwood WA Twr - Cons( Sys No 0000 357.50 33,233.64 69.38 0.00 05/02/2(117 Cell Phones - Adniin No 0000 253.35 0.00 05/02/2017 Cell Phones - Fire No 0000 206.95 0,00 05/02/2017 Cell Phones - Bldg No 0000 136.72 0.00 05/02/2017 Cell Phones - PW No 0000 119.34 0.00 05/02/2017 Cell Phones - Parks - No 0000 17.45 0.00 05/02/2017 Cell Phones - Planning No 0000 803,19 803.19 192,00 0.00 05/02/2017 Annual Physical - Witter No 0000 192.00 192.00 Page 9 Invoice # 111V Date Amount Quantity Pint Dote Description Reference Task Type I'O # Close POLine # TDS TDS Melrocorn - LLC 6517142209 04/25/2014 92.05 0.00 05/02/2017 Analog Lines - Fire No 0000 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 6517142209 04/25/2014 221.86 0.00 05/02/2017 Analog Lines - PW No 0000 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 651 7142209 04/25/2014 85.10 0.00 05/02/2017 Analog Lines - Life Station No 0000 602-495-9450-43210 Telephone 6517142209 04/25/2014 44.55 0.00 05/02/2017 Analog Lines - Well 1-louse No 0000 601-494-9400-43210 Teleplione 6517142209 Total: 443.56 TDS Total: 443.56 TMOBILE T Mobile 947226(195 04/11/2017 10,68 0.00 05/02/2017 SCADA Line No 0000 601-494-9400-43210 Telephone 947226095 04/11/2017 10,69 0.00 05/02/2017 SCADA Line No 001)1) 607-495-9450-43210 Telephone 947226095 Total: 21.37 TMOB I LE Total: 21.37 VERIZON Verizon Wireless 9783756630 04/10/2017 35.01 0.00 05/02/2017 Air Card for Tablet 0311-04 I 0 No 0000 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 9783756630 Total; 35.01 V ER1ZON Tom': 35.01 WAS -PH Washington County 18581-01 02/16/2017 25.00 0.00 05/02/2017 I laz Waste Gen License No 0000 601-494-9400-44300 Miscellaneous 18581-01 Total: 75.00 18581-02 02/16/2017 50.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Haz Waste Gen License No 0000 601-494-9400-44300 Miscellaneous 18581-02 Total: 50.00 WAS -PH Total: 75.00 WA SHCONS Washington Conservation Dist, 3780 03/31/2017 625.00 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 I st Q 2017 Shared Educator No 0000 603-496-9500-44370 Conferences & Training 3780 Total: 625.00 WAS FICONS Total: 625.00 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) Page I 0 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # WASHTAX Washington County 116412 04/11/2017 10 I -410-1320-43100 Assessing Services 116412 Total: WASHTAX Total; WENSMAN Wensman Stephen 20170430 04/30/2017 803-490-9070-44300 Miscellaneous Expenses 20170430 Total: WENSMAN Total: 1,735.00 0.00 05/02/2017 2017 SPASMT Billing 1,735.00 1,735.00 43.44 0.00 05/02/2017 Mileage - Wensman 43.44 43.44 Whiteani White Anita 20170426 04/26/2017 55,00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper Council Wksp 041117 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 20170426 ((4/26/2017 55.00 0.00 05/02/2017 Cable Oper Council Mtg 041817 101-410-145043620 Cable Operations 20170426 Total; 1 10.00 Whiteimi Total: I 10.00 WOODC1TY City of Woodbury 17-0248 04/20/2017 101-420-2500-43150 Contract Services 17-0248 Total: WOODCITY Total: XCEL Xeel Energy 543331468 04/20/201 7 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility 543331463 Total: 543390059 04/20/2017 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 543390059 Total: 543396425 0400/70 I 7 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 543396425 Total: 543397985 04/20/2017 101-450-5700-43810 Electric Utility 543397935 Total: 5434(14935 04/20/2017 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 543404935 Total: AI' - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/)7 - 2:30 PM) 900.00 0.00 05/02/2017 2017 Warning Siren Monitoring Fee 900.00 900,00 222.18 0.00 05/02/2017 New Lill Station 222.18 11.75 0.00 05/02/2017 Tennis Court 11,75 144.75 0.00 05/02/2017 Parks Bldg 144.75 2 I .9? 0.00 05/02/2017 Pebble Park 21.92 110,95 0.00 05/02/2017 Arts Center I 10.95 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 01100 No 0000 No 0000 Page 11 Invoice # 543412164 101-430-3160-438 54341 3513 602-495-9450-438 543418117 101-420-2220-438 543418868 602-495-9450-438 543420894 101-450-5200-438 543421991 101-430-3160-438 543432807 601-494-9400-43S 543441017 101-430-3160-438 543452612 601-494-9400-438 543455272 601-494-9400-438 543470200 101-420-2220-4381 543472579 101-450-5200-4381 543482(174 10)-430-3160-4381 543505256 206-450-5300-4381 543547816 101-420-2220-4381 Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 04/20/2017 10 Street Lighting 543412164 Total: (14/2(1/2017 10 Electric Utility 543413513 'fatal: 04/20/201 7 10 Electric Utility 543418117 Total: 04/20/2017 10 Electric Utility 543418868 Total: 04/20/2017 10 Electric Utility 54342(1894 Total: 04/20/201 7 10 Street Lighting 543421991 Total: 04/20/2017 10 Electric Utility 543432807 Total: 04/20/2017 10 Street Lighting 543441017 Total: 04/20/2017 10 Electric Utility 543452612 Total: 04/20/2017 ID Electric Utility 543455272 Total; 04/20/20 I 7 0 Electric Utility 543470200 Total: 04/20/20 I 7 0 Electric Utility 543472579 Total: 04/20/20 I 7 (1 Street Lighting 543482(174 Total: 04/21/20 17 0 Electric Utility 543505256 Total: (14/21/2017 0 Electric Utility 543547816 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/27/17 - 2:30 PM) 41.06 0.00 05/02/2017 Traffic Lights 41.06 20.46 0.00 05/02/2017 Lift Station 20.46 371.63 0,00 05/02/2017 Fire Station 1 371.63 18.08 0.00 05/02/2017 Lill Station 18.08 769.72 0.00 05/02/2017 Legion Park 269.72 29.24 0,00 05/02/20 I 7 Traffic Lgt Manning & Stillwater 29,24 111.89 0,00 05/02/2017 Water Tower 2 111.89 12,87 0.00 05/02/20 I 7 Speed Sign Hwy 5 12.87 136.48 0,00 05/02/2017 Pumphouse 136,48 1,373.62 0,00 05/02/2017 Pumphouse 1,373,62 36.49 0.00 05/02/2017 Traffic Lights 36.49 14.16 0.00 05/02/2017 Sunfish Park Gates 14.16 45.96 0,00 05/02/2017 Ironic Lights 45.96 388.20 0.00 05/02/201 7 Library 388.20 447.57 0.00 05/02/2017 Fire Station 2 447.57 No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No (MOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 MOO 0000 0000 0(100 0000 Page 12 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO ft Close POLine # XCEL Total: 3,828.98 Report Total: 206,562.66 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04727/17 - 2:30 PM) Page 13 TI IF:, CITY ()I, LAKE El MO STAFF REPORT DATE: May 2, 2017 CONSENT ITEM #: AGENDA ITEM: 2018 Budget Schedule SUBMITTED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Brian Swanson, Finance Director BACKGROUND: Similar to last year, the City Council is asked to accept the proposed 2018 budget key dates for planning purposes. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: What should the schedule be for developing the 2018 budget? PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Included in your packet is a proposed schedule. Staff has already begun working on the CIP. The CIP will be brought to committees/commission first then followed by the operating budgets. The finance committee and council will hold a joint session in August. Then Council will have another work session to review the proposed budget prior to certifying the maximum levy in September. Last year the council used the November work session to discuss further changes to the proposed budget so staff is including that as an optional meeting again this year. The final budget would be adopted and certitied to the County in December. FISCAL IMPACT: NA OPTIONS: 1) Approve the proposed schedule 2) Amend and then approve a schedule RECOMMENDATION: If removed from the consent agenda: Motion to approve the 2018 Budget Schedule ATTACHMENTS: • 2018 Budget Schedule CITY OF LAKE ELMO 2018 Proposed Budget Calendar As of 4/26/2017 4/19/2017 Draft CIP Package Distributed to Denartmen(c 5/12/2017 Proposed CIF listings to Administrator and Finance Director 5/22/2017 Proposed Parks CIP to Parks Commission 5/23/2017 Proposed CIP from MAC and Public Safety 6/8/2017 Proposed 5 year C1P presented to Finance Committee 6/12/2017 Revenue and expense budget detail to Dept heads (actuals through May) for use to project balance of 2017 and 2018 budget 6/19/20 7 Detailed 2017/2018 budget worksheets due back to Finance 6/26-6/30 Budget review with Dept. Heads, Administrator & Finance Department 7/6/2017 Departmental changes completed by Finance 7/7/2017 Proposed Budget to Dept. Supervisors for Final Comments 7/13/2017 Proposed 2018 budgets to FC 8/10/2017 -Finance and Council Workshop — Proposed Budget 8/22/2017 Council Workshop — Proposed Budget 9/19/2017 Proposed Budget to City Council For Adoption by Resolution & Property Tax Levy 9/29/2017 Proposed Budget (adopted by Resolution) & Proposed Property Tax Levy Certified to the County. Certify Hearing(s) Dates. 11/14/2017 Council Workshop — Proposed Budget (optional) 12/5/2017 Final Budget & Levy determination Public Hearing 7:OOPM City Hall 12/19/2017 Final Budget & Levy Determination(if necessary) 7:00PM Cii.V Hall - 12/28/2017 Final Levy certified to the County & Adopt Final Budget CRITICAL DATES TI IF CITY ( LAKE ELMO STAFF REPORT DATE: May 2, 2017 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #: 4 AGENDA ITEM: CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Street, Drainage, Trail and Sanitary Sewer Improvements — Public Improvement Hearing, Ordering the lmprovetnents and Final Assessment Hearing SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Kristina Handt, City Administrator Brian Swanson, Finance Director Sarah Sonsalla, City Attorney Rob Weldon, Public Works Director Chad Isakson, Project Engineer ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: Should the City Council Order the Improvements and adopt the Final Assessment Role for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Street, Drainage, Trail and Sanitary Sewer Improvements? BACKGROUND: On April 4, 2017, the Lake Elmo City Council accepted the feasibility report and called for a public improvement hearing and final assessment hearing for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Street, Drainage, Trail and Sanitary Sewer Improvements. The project includes the Phase 2 extension of sanitary sewer for the Olson Lake Trail municipal urban service area. The Phase 1 sanitary sewer extension project was constructed in 2013 with Phase 2 intended to be constructed in coordination with Washington County's street reconstruction along CSAH 13. Washington County has programmed the CSAH 13 street improvements to be constructed in 2017 and initiated the planning and preliminary design work accordingly. The Lake Elmo City Council provided municipal consent for the CSAH 13 Phase 1 Improvements as presented by Washington County on July 19, 2016. The proposed improvements are located on Olson Lake Trail (CSAH 13) from 44'h Street North to 50th Street North. The street is owned and operated by Washington County and the City Boundary between Oakdale and Lake Elmo is along the center of the street. The main objective of this project is to extend municipal sanitary sewer service along Olson Lake Trail to an area served by septic systems adjacent to Olson Lake. The project has been coordinated to be cost effectively implemented with the Washington County street improvements. Washington County is improving the condition of the streets, providing drainage improvements and installing an off-street trail for pedestrians and bicyclists. A public informational meeting was held on December 15. 2016 at Oakdale City Hall to present approximate assessment information and answer questions from the public. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: The City Council is respectfully requested to hold the Public Improvement Hearing for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements; and following the hearing, consider adopting Resolution 2017-042 Ordering the hnprovement. Please note that because this project was initiated by the City Council, and not by a resident petition, Ordering the Improvement may be adopted only by vote of four -fifths of all members of the council. After the public hearing is closed, and if council adopts Resolution 2017-042 Ordering the Improvement, the Council is further asked to hold the final assessment hearing for the project. The final assessment hearing is being held prior to construction since the sanitary sewer assessment amount was set by the Phase 1 feasibility report completed in 2013 and because the street, drainage and trail assessment will be set by the City cost share for the Washington County led project. Pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429 the Council must declare the amount to be assessed against the benefiting properties and the hearing on the proposed assessment for those improvements must be conducted. Staff has enclosed a proposed Final Assessment Roll as recommended in the feasibility report. After the hearing is closed the City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Resolution 2017-042 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll. The attached notices were published in the official newspaper and individual notifications were sent to each address that potentially will be impacted by these improvements. A Feasibility Report has been completed and adopted by the City Council defining the scope of the proposed improvements together with the estimated project costs. The following summarizes the report findings, revised street assessments per Council direction, and recommendations: Sanitary Sewer: • The project will be implemented as a joint effort between Washington County, the City of Lake Elmo, and the City of Oakdale, coordinated through Cooperative and Joint Powers Agreements. Washington County is the lead agency. The project will provide municipal sanitary sewer service to an additional 13 Lake Elmo properties and 7 Oakdale Properties through the extension of the existing Oakdale sanitary sewer system. The estimated one-time unit assessment for sanitary sewer will be levied over 20 years. The base assessment value is $20,500. This unit assessment has been reduced by $3,000 for those properties that will incur additional installation costs for an individual pumping station. The pumping station purchase is included in the unit assessment and the $3,000 assessment deduction provides a set allowance for the pumping station installation. Additional costs in the estimated combined amount of $3,500 would be collected from property owners by the City of Oakdale at the time of connection to sewer. This amount is comprised of various permitting and connection fees previously established by the Oakdale utility and includes the Met Council SAC fee. • Properties will also be directly responsible to pay a private plumbing contractor to make the service connection for their property, from the right-of-way to their home. This cost is property specific and includes the installation of the pumping station if required. Lake Elmo ordinance requires properties to connect to sanitary sewer service within 2 years. Once connected, the City of Oakdale will bill on a quarterly basis for ongoing sewer use charges. Under cuiTent practice, Oakdale uses the winter quarter water use of the property, as metered from the private well, to determine and bill for annual sewer flows. Street, Drainage, and Trail Improvements: • CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) is a County State Aid Highway, Improvements made along CSAH 13 must meet minimum County state aid design standards. The CSAH 13 improvements have been developed and recommended by Washington County after receiving public input. Preliminary plans were approved by both Oakdale and Lake Elmo. Washington County requires City cost participation based on County policy, including permanent and temporary right-of-way acquisition, pedestrian trail improvements, curb and gutter, retaining walls, and storm water pond construction costs. Residential properties will be assessed on a per unit basis at 30% of the total city cost share for those improvements. The street, drainage, and trail assessment for each parcel on this project is $5,600 for 23 residential properties. The assessment will be levied over a 15-years. FISCAL IMPACT: The estimated total project cost is $5,500,000 with the City cost share estimated to be $640,000. The City share of the street, drainage, and trail improvements is estimated at $425,000 and City share of the sanitary sewer improvements estimated at $214,800. The improvements are proposed to be assessed against the benefitting properties consistent with the City's Special Assessment Policy including proposed assessments in the amount of $128,800 for the street, drainage and trail improvements and $230,500 for the sanitary sewer improvements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve Resolution 2017-042 Ordering the Improvements. Staff is also recommending that the City Council approve Resolution 2017- 043 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll. The suggested motions to approve these actions are as follows: "Move to adopt Resolution No. 2017-042 Order the Improvements for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements." and "Move to adopt Resolution No. 2017-043 Adopting the Final Assessment Roll for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2017-042 Ordering the improvements for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements. 7. Notice of Hearing on Improvement. 3. Resolution No. 2017-043 Adopting the final assessment roll for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements. 4. Notice of Hearing on Proposed Assessment. 5. Location Map, 6. Assessment Roll. CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-042 A RESOLUTION ORDERING THE IMPROVEMENT FOR CSAH 13 (IDEAL AVENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to city council authorization, adopted on April 4, 2017, the council ordered a hearing on improvement for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements; and WHEREAS, ten days mailed notice and two weeks published notice of the hearing was given, and the healing was held thereon on the 2" day of May, 2017, at which all persons desiring to be heard were given the opportunity to be heard thereon; and WHEREAS, the feasibility report prepared by SEH, Inc., and dated April, 2017 states that the project is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. Such improvement is deemed necessary, cost-effective, and feasible as detailed in the Feasibility Report dated April 2017. 2. Such improvement is hereby ordered as proposed in the council resolution adopted this ?"d day of May, 2017. 3 The city council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON TILE SECOND DAY OF MAY, 2017. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO NOTICE OF HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT CSAH 13 (IDEAL AVENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Lake Elmo will meet in the council chambers of the city hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 2, 2017, to consider the making of the following improvements, pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Sections 429.011 to 429.111: The improvements consist of the extension or sanitary sewer along CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) between 44'1' Street North and 50`1' Street North including the reconstruction of the existing streets with concrete curb and gutter, installation of storm sewer, and construction of an off -road bituminous trail. Sanitary sewer assessments are proposed for those properties that abut the improvements and receive a service stub as part of the project including 4473, 4497, 4565, 4719, 4751, 4769, 4823, 4849, 4863, 4891, 4911, and 4941 Olson Lake Trail and 7803 50'1' Street North. The area proposed to be assessed for the street, drainage, and trail improvements include the properties directly abutting and accessing the proposed streets along CSAH 13 between 44`h Street North and 50'1' Street North. The estimated total cost for the project is $5,500,000 with the street, drainage, and trail improvements estimated at $5,160,000 and the sanitary sewer improvements estimated at $340,000. A reasonable estimate of the impact of the assessment will be available at the hearing. Such persons as desiring to be heard with reference to the proposed improvements will be heard at this meeting. DATED: April 4, 2017 BY ORDER OF THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor (Published in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review on April 12 and 19, 2017) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-043 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL FOR THE CSAH 13 (IDEAL AVENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to proper notice duly given as required by law, the Council has met and heard and passed upon all objections to the proposed assessment for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements including street, drainage, trail, and sanitary sewer improvements along CSAH 13 from 44" Street North to 50Street North. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. Such proposed assessment, a copy of which is attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby accepted and shall constitute the special assessment against the lands named therein, and each tract of land therein included is hereby found to be benefited by the proposed improvement in the amount of the assessment levied against it. Such assessment shall be payable in equal annual installments extending over 15 years for street, drainage and trail improvements and 20 years for sanitary sewer, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January, 2018, and shall bear interest at the rate of 4.0% percent per annum from October 31, 2017. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from October 31, 2017 until December 31, 2017. To each subsequent installment, when due, shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. 3. The owner of any property so assessed may, at any time prior to the certification of the assessment to the county auditor, pay the whole of the assessment on such property, with the interest accrued from October 31, 2017 to the date of payment, to the City Clerk, except that no interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid prior to October 31, 2017; and he/she may, at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 31 or interest will be charged through December 31 of the next succeeding year. 4, The City Clerk shall forthwith transmit a certified duplicate of this assessment to the County Auditor to be extended on the property tax lists of the county. Such assessments shall be collected and paid over in the same manner as other municipal taxes. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SECOND DAY OF MAY, 2017. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO NOTICE OF HEARING ON PROPOSED ASSESSMENT CSAH 13 (IDEAL AVENUE/OLSON LAKE TRAIL) IMPROVEMENTS Notice is hereby given that the City Council of Lake Elmo will meet in the Council Chambers of the City Hall at or approximately after 7:00 P.M. on Tuesday, May 2, 2017, to consider, and possibly adopt, the proposed assessment against abutting property for the CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) Improvements. Adoption by the Council of the proposed assessment may occur at the hearing. The following describes the area proposed to be assessed: Street, drainage, and trail improvements along CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) from 44th Street North to 50'1' Street North. Sanitary sewer improvements along CSAH 13 (Ideal Avenue/Olson Lake Trail) from 44'1' Street North to 50th Street North. Properties include 4473, 4497, 4565, 4719, 4751, 4769, 4823, 4849, 4863, 4891, 4911, and 4941 Olson Lake Trail and 7803 50th Street North. You may at any time prior to certification of the assessment to the county auditor on October 31, 2017, pay the entire assessment on such property to the City Clerk with interest accrued to the date of payment. No interest shall be charged if the entire assessment is paid to the City Clerk prior to October 31, 2017. You may at any time thereafter, pay to the City Clerk the entire amount of the assessment remaining unpaid, with interest accrued to December 31 of the year in which such payment is made. Such payment must be made before October 31 (date assessment certified to County Auditor) or interest will be charged through December 3 I of the succeeding year. If you decide not to prepay the assessment before the date given above the rate of interest that will apply is 4.00 percent per year. Once assessments are certified to the County, the assessments are payable in equal annual installments extending over a period of 15 years for street, drainage and trail improvements and 20 years for sanitary sewer improvements, the first of the installments to be payable on or before the first Monday in January 2018, and will bear interest at the rate of 4.00 percent per annum from the date of adoption of the assessment resolution. To the first installment shall be added interest on the entire assessment from the date of the assessment resolution until December 31, 2017. To each subsequent installment when due shall be added interest for one year on all unpaid installments. The proposed assessment roll is on file for public inspection at the City Clerk's office. The total amount of the proposed street improvement assessment is S128,800. The total amount of the proposed sanitary sewer improvement assessment is $230,500. Written or oral objections will be considered at the meeting. No appeal may be taken as to the amount of an assessment unless a written objection signed by the affected property owner is filed with the municipal clerk prior to the assessment hearing or presented to the presiding officer at the hearing. The Council may upon such notice consider any objection to the amount of a proposed individual assessment at an adjourned meeting upon such further notice to the affected property owners as it deems advisable. An owner may appeal an assessment to district court pursuant to Minnesota Statutes, Section 429.081 by serving notice of the appeal upon the Mayor or Clerk within 30 days after the adoption of the assessment and filing such notice with the district court within ten days after service upon the Mayor or Clerk. The City Council is authorized in its discretion to defer the payment of an assessment for any homestead property owned by a person for whom it would be a hardship to make payment if the owner is 65 years of age or older and/or the owner is a person retired by virtue of a permanent and total disability or by a person who is a member of the Minnesota National Guard or other military reserves who is ordered into active military service, as defined in section 190.05 subdivision 5b or 5c, as stated in the person's military orders, for whom it would be a hardship to make the payments. The owner must request a deferment of the assessment at or before the public hearing at which the assessment is adopted and make application on forms prescribed by the City Clerk within 30 days after the adoption. Notwithstanding the standards and guidelines established by the City for determining a hardship, a deferment of an assessment may be obtained pursuant to Minnesota Statutes Section 435.193. DATED: April 4, 2017 BY ORDER OF THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor (1'ithiished in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review on April 12. 2017) --- , / 1 72,,, / - \ ' LILL TS I.1f911-99 \ 99,,„ \ \ ! \ ' 19" \ / / \ ----- I,- r.„, -- 1 / ,,-,r :.„.\-- . ' I • 1 I I I ' ' T- ,---; -1 , \ i / I _..L1 . i 40TH _$1tikET N ITH 99 ;111: SI:\ 9,99991 999911 L1935. 19ATLIPTS HITT\ 1..19 ST. PAHL 9,51 H 9, 99,e. HI NO, 139299 DATE: 03/14/17 9 VII 0, LOCATION MAP OLSON LAKE TRAIL IMPROVEMENTS OAKDALE, MINNESOTA L.% EXHIBIT NO. 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MN. APRIL 2017 GSAN 13: STREET, DRAINAGE, AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS FINAL ASSESSMENT ROLL PAGE 1 of 1 30. NAME ADDRESS MAILING ADDRESS PID TOTAL ASSESSMENT STREET ASSMT SAN SEWER ASMT 1 DAVID SOVEREIGN LIVING TRS 4415 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4415 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE E ELMO MN 55042 0902921320030 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 2 SOVEREIGN JEFFERY C 4405 OLSON LAKE TRL N 8 EVERGREEN DR LANDFALL MN 55128 0902921320022 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 3 HILLEREN ANNA-MARIE 5 & MICHAEL 1 4455 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4455 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0902921320021 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 4 FLANAGAN PATRICK I & ANNE H 4473 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4473 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0902921320001 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 5 HOLM BARBARA E 4497 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4497 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140059 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 6 ANDERSON JEANNE M & ANTHONY P NELSON 4535 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4535 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140006 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 7 LEAKE JEFFERY R & ELIZABETH A 4545 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4545 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140061 $ 5,600.00 S 5,600.00 8 SCHWALBACH JAMES & BEVERLY TRS 4555 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4555 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140052 $ 5,600.00 $ 5.600.00 9 SCHULTZ CAROLYN A 4565 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4565 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140066 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600,00 $ 17,500.00 10 HAIDER ANTHONY 1 & DIANE M 4575 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4575 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140067 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 11 PATRICIA GRAHAM FAMILY TR5 4635 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4635 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140005 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 12 HEINS SCOTT & KRISTINE 4655 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4655 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140072 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600.00 13 TAYLOR REBECCA M 4671 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4671 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140071 $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600,00 14 STOBER THOMAS 4709 0150N LAKE TRL N 4709 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 080292114007C $ 5,600.00 $ 5,600,00 15 BRINK MARY F & THOMAS W 4719 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4719 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140069 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 16 FIELDS FAMILY TR5 4751 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4751 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921140065 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600,00 $ 17,500.00 17 PEPIN ANNALIESE M & BRYAN G MILLER 4769 OLSON LANE TRL N 4769 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110011 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 18 GERGEN ELIZABETH 1 4823 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4823 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110012 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600,00 $ 17,500,00 19 SEIFERT THOMAS V & DARYL P 4849 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4849 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110001 $ 23,100,00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 20 KETZNER BRUCE M & BETH A 4863 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4863 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110019 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600,00 $ 17,500,00 21 KOSTUCH GREGORY D & PATRICIA M 4891 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4891 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110005 $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 12 JANET L SCHNEIDER TR5 4911 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4911 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 080292111000E $ 23,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 17,500.00 23 FORSHIER CLAUDE & BARBARA 4941 OLSON LAKE TRL N 4941 OLSON LAKE TRL N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0802921110004 $ 26,100.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 20,500.00 24 REVOIR HAR0LD1 &JANE L 7803 50TH 5T N 7803 50TH ST N LAKE ELMO MN 55042 0892921110008 $ 17,500.00 $ - $ 17,500.00 TOTAL $ 359,300.00 5 128,800.60 $ 230,500.00 IF CITY OF LAKE ELMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: STAFF REPORT DATE: May 2, 2017 REGULAR ITEM #: 5 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvements — Accept Bids and Award Contract Jack Griffin, City Engineer Kristina Handt, City Administrator Rob Weldon, Public Works Director Chad Isakson, Project Engineer BACKGROUND: The 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) is located along Hudson Boulevard approximately 1,600 feet east of Inwood Avenue. The lift station was constructed as part of the Eagle Point Business Park with the capacity to serve only the 160 acre business park area. In 2013 the City expanded the sanitary sewer and water service area beyond the Eagle Point Business Park to include the area south of 10th Street between Inwood Avenue and Keats Avenue, consisting of 4.5 times the service area. With this expanded service area it was identified that Lift Station No. 1 would need to be replaced as the new service area was built - out and the replacement was programmed in the City's Capital Improvement Plan for 2017. The CIP listed this improvement as the Hudson Boulevard Lift Station. In 2016, staff reviewed the condition and capacity of Lift Station No. 1 and verified that replacement should occur as planned. On October 4, 2016 the council authorized the preparation of plans and specifications for the improvements for construction in 2017. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: Should the City Council accept bids and award a contract for the 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvements? PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Bids were received, publicly opened, and read aloud on Thursday, April 20. The City's design consultant has prepared and attached a Tabulation of Bids and a letter of recommendation for the award of the contract. The City received 10 bids for this project, with R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. providing the lowest bid in the amount of 5809,129.70. Contractor references for R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. were reviewed and verified. The City Engineer and his consultant are therefore recommending that the Council award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc. as outlined in the attached letter. The City Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvements on March 21, 2017 and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids. The Project was advertised on QuestCDN.com and in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review in accordance with the Minnesota Competitive Bidding requirements. The improvements include the replacement of Lift Station No. 1 including a three-purnp lift station sized for the initial pumps (2.02 MGD) to handle today's lower flow conditions and also be able to accommodate the service area up to 85% of full build -out. Once at capacity the pumps will be able to be pulled and replaced with minimal changes to the other lift station components to meet the full demand at build -out (2.40 MGD). The lift station improvements include an on -site generator for back-up power, electrical control panel, SCADA controls, and site improvements. The sanitary sewer improvements include approximately 1,700 feet of 15-inch diameter trunk gravity sewer along Hudson Boulevard from the existing lift station site to Jade Trail North, the new street to the Boulder Ponds subdivision. The new sewer is replacing existing 12-inch and 10-inch sewer that is too small to meet the growing demands. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this resolution commits the council to enter into a construction contract for the project with a construction contract amount of $809,129.70. The total Post -Bid estimated project cost is $1,007,000 to be paid from the Sanitary Sewer Enterprise fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2017-044, thereby accepting bids and awarding a contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $809,129.70, for the 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvetnents. The recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2017-044, accepting bids and awarding a contract to R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc., in the amount of $809,129.70 for the I-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer hnprovements." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2017-044 Accepting Bids and Awarding a Contract. 2. Engineer's Letter of Award Recommendation and Tabulation of Bids. 3. Project Schedule. CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-044 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING A CONT CT FOR THE I-94 LIFT STATION (NO. 1) AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and bids were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, bids were tabulated, checked and summarized to verify that all requirements of the submittal were met; and WHEREAS, the project engineer reviewed the bids and has provided a letter recommending the award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, R.L. Larson Excavating, Inc., for the amount of $809,129.70. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk and hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract in the accordance with the above ordered Project, in the amount of the Contractor's lowest responsible Base Bid, and according to the plans and specifications thereof approved by the City Council. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SECOND DAY OF MAY 2017. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Julie Johnson City Clerk Real People. Real Solutions. April 24, 2017 Jack Griffin City Engineer City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue N. Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 RE: 1-94 Lift Station (No. 1) and Sanitary Sewer Improvements City of Lake Elmo, MN Project No. 2016.134 BMI Project No. N15.112590 Dear Mr. Griffin, 2035 County Road D East Maplewood, MN 55109-5314 Ph: (651) 704-9970 Fax (651) 704-9971 Bo [to n-M en k. co rn Attached is the bid abstract for the project referenced above. Bids were received at City Hall at 3:00 p.m. on Thursday, April 20, 2017. Bidder Base Bid RL Larson Excavating Inc. $809,129.70 A-1 Excavating Inc. $828,372.00 Kuechle Underground Inc. $943,806.00 Pember Companies, Inc. $950,491.20 Burschville Construction Inc. $959,914.00 Geislinger & Sons $1,042,181.00 S R Weidema, Incorporated $1,044,973.30 Lametti & Sons, Inc. $1,047,300.00 Northdale Construction Company $1,069,645.64 LaTour Construction, Inc. $1,092,776.70 Engineer's Estimate $930,000 We recommend awarding this bid to RL Larson Excavating Inc. in the amount of $809,129.70. Sincerely, Bolton & Menk, Inc. Michael R. Warner, P.E. Project Engineer Enclosure 4metronedltillkelmnin1511259016_ plans -specs\ b_bid tabulalion111Z590 atm:tract. Icr.docx ealter & Meek s 31 equal uppor.unity ernolc±,er. 0051140700110133 301544404 40 0 1140.43.1.753 Ey 11 15103001/3444413 Ct. 030.41 stn. 0.3114.1044 owe, 440.... 3 Rt 1001041 3 43410.41.1 1117 .1 EXCAVASING IF. 00EO30.3 1141111.40031411134C E7E.F3 C04,0P4(11 5 IF. 744054,443 LE u4 413113.3407314. IAPPRO5 Own /OW Mil TM. 1714443 MT. LEOT 04000 003 TOT. ahl'o',‘ ITEM .41 031410045 PM. PRIDE POKE PRI. ?RICE 041103 01410E POICE EIKE PRICE 314110I 43080434404335300 I 040311150106 53 S 14.54u of/ 5.000 Do 310 044.. 4341.744.4' 545... 00 04 0440710 574.74774. 5097.4.4 4 Is...qv S15 aos ce 7 41E34.E03411. 35 51540100 sr 30004 5710040 5.0000 5E000E1 Ss DM. 03.5430. 31.50001 51.040Oa 57.1.034 3 P6141134 E.. Er I E 31 4530 631.043 1S 331044000 5310,7 00 SAT We. 440 0.00 ?IS EX.. 515E1.. 51.14.00 51050410 51.0000 427.0750 4 111E00.330.13 IA 5115 E. EL.'S 00 505607 543 .0. V70 0 515E1 uo 5575 DO 52.573 El 51.513 151 SEE 445 co 5 OW./ .43734054 04 E... 3111.43.37540145414.3 50 1350 54 Du 53 OW DO 51 1. 33 E.. 5.6.3 0.0DO SA 00 5500400 510. A .4.105. ?op 043.3. nt 1513111. 4 otorREIF 414E534E1 SY 70 31000 S30000 E. Oa 1,15000 51700 5.44 ao 33.144 504441 313 El 53157. 7 004440444 ?ED .11.E Ei 140.1045 1O. MEE COD 4..3 411 11 34 . 10405 .50 043 SE 00 4344. 3300 510000 53 043 3010 1. 51057 3330041 A ROME. 4.01.440. OF 51011406014400,111 tt leo 51010 SLAW. 55 00 500000 51E1 5140043 SI ES 5031E00 SEDc. 5100000 4 10541Ovi 413411.311.3 373.1340.3.4.54543.111.43 LF 1 770 51 r. 31 030.1 54 07 570.00 30. 5159300 55 55 31151150 A500 SA 1511141 10 401404113011.343030E7E4E10. 5101.433350011. Ef I. 51000 01114100 51500 51.633 00 34410 51.373 070 513 70 5.31150 12000 5130000 11 3.40YE?1,017.4013 OF .35311.3.10ARESC35405.40141. EA 5500 00 53.50000 5443 00 52.117500 5340140 SY 1.1141 3310VI 53415710 55. A. 515.100 12 4104431. ?NE OOP°. OF N.. 30431 0.014 IF . 110 DO 510040 55. 51E1 00 AEI 52000 id SO $150 EU 510 .4 511. OE 11 341,1411010104054054 OF 141100 3.0 to 045 DO 351 DO 57500 535 GO 53000 550E0 53150 557 50 3750 043 5730Oa I. 55704457MED 1.41151441 741410. EA 5330E1 310000 3204300 5100 Oa 512574 5125. 5130.0 WOW 540 047 530004 13 504075040011410570115400 LA 54017. SEW .1 117410 51.100 54.. 5E3000 5110E1 5.000 330000 51.00E1 14 44351345 ela .3441441010?07MEW I. Om 5450 51.740 00 12E0 53.350 00 38E1 51 770000 5400 5300000 SA El 55 2.. 17 501. M. AO Won.. FE .11110. 435071704 FA 51 E.. 58 ?DO. 11 1303043 S.... 555E00 313 04341. 51 543 4. 53.040 57 SEW 31500 4. 40 00044.1114.41E4164010.. ?.5.430004EF E7 7050*00 57 spoon 511030 33.154300 1.3 02 SI 45111. 5475 00 57 us a, 50051000E0 1/ E001.. E511. 70344.3480100011 00 51.6114.00 4000000 0150000 3310180 5 t3ea00 0a0. 5075 43o 5754070 1 500041 51.50000 07 151114. SOU 35 54.041. 5.1011 14513.1? 10 DEE? .3 S.. 110 025t. SAS ou SED 015 . s. ot, 94100400 563,17 511.5,50 30347 S. 0.00 311 ES" 1.7 34.33 3.104.454.1.1.15.4 15' WV. 31 OYU 304,41? 343114 50 549000 344.03460 11. F. S... 00 s'n Su 5574.700 0 3115 OE _. 5103.70 01 7/ IS" P.A. 510015 5471flayy SEM? 4005, 1. 4 743 51f 0 1, 55 511700 45.415 E. SEEM . 31000 ilAr 00 5753500 AI. 00 30.195 El 113304 3E2 175 041 111 1.15.759005410101.51.40114..4 70' pEEE . 350 553 RD 514514 CO 505 Ea 5E3.11100 5114 4143 5411 1541. 53100 500335110 511000 51010004 71 W.? 03 10 3.4414....15 PEE, 0" ID KEE IF 110 50117 510E100 577E3 51.11. 5113. SA 5.4. 54450 3 I 11.1. 512547 31.300 4. 74 94304011004 SIE.0437540.1 Mop E. 53 lam 5331.30 314004. 3340000 11010 e, 35 11.3. 54 E. rn 54.0000 54 EWE, 440710 75 1.1557'654004. FA it Oa,. 33.500 50000 33701000 APSU C. 517E000 5900ott 14 50000 549017, 33 430E1 74 43 ...FE 514.34. 51.8 731.04313 FA ?EU.. E.... 510000 519 0E000 34300 00 .,..,_ 533 10000 53.0 Da 573 144180 EV 5 IOW 5E4E10 Go 73 .10334131....55 53.1403E 104174 4 or 44 117000 11.1047 5705 00 314E400 S30000 52410000 5 /... 57100430 313000 51 400740 33 555140074 ON. . 51.011 00 54.200 05 3E50000 550110 00 30200000 541 2004. 51E00087 540EV PO 4150014 SA SOO. 34 10 13044.3 435 51(ET7. 4 311.41.11.344...1 A v 54 3744. 514.0E3 SIS AO 4... 574 00 51 14.4131 5E000 351530 04 5.707 53.1014 13 .503510.115710/4110.1165 11 SO 55000 32.54040 3,14.40 5216/300 540 440 5/£0,000 44, . 57,2So. 330054 50..110 . 111.13001 LE 1153 31 33 5244 13 1? 31E. 33 MOD S1S. 5.458 Du il a, 51115. SY Do 33 SU DO 33 34.3.51014 11 5.000000 5350 11.../ 5111305744 53433 OW 151 331070400 5303.00710 5.35410E0 543000000 33,500E0 51E1.000 0 ,IAlit,a, GF tg 4.81011 13 4545110 Oa 53.00008 747 0410 00 ESY 07000 3061310. 5334054 Do 457.0.00 551070401 55250.00 557 300. 444 504045E1411111(0 t3 5 044 70 S21004 Co 5S .41. 55 MUM 77 E.. 521114154 30500001 1114E1010 3200.1 5.E1EA 44 5010.411E8'5040044314 FA AY. 1 477tttt0 5550 E? 51.0 DO 5470' 0 St. Do 34E400 51.0E1 5150 4. .45 34 547570341 400441. 5141.53.17.151.7114/L 11, 0 545 51.0 N 54 741040 1046000 Es W. 150E1. 03 41 1.04 EA. .145.4K47I K,F NW, .14,41 4533300E tfa eons 34*3130 13433000<10 31 AA0500f88Fr4Ei5EP 30.3300E3311.35 t11'0000 008.0 1050 013 r OF 144E ELMO 0045I0310 30'i Cu000, 333033 5t3i4 GE15214033&43tNt 1f,'L SRVtE€pFMd.I3d4. 11lA0•E1&5£3N5.£0C 34001473a3 c._0tl51014033 od ('f€t 4*0840 EniJUR C6943114 t'fitSry t911 I ITN4P.4.0 03300330N(l 090 0dlt 0 00 01343 t4TAi UNO 0TA UNLT 010 I1SN1 UNLT 00AN313Y PRICE PR£($ PA. CA3C5 PRFtt A.. Pa3C£ *0101 Pit3Ci FART Y 3 5360314Rr5EWE33 3 '/O2113007 41 45 0 53100100 S38000.00 516.100 540043005 5550033333 MAX,. Oro 331£✓3 57933300 517344*0 57740001 1 1140000 7100t 43 3 53030.00 5003400 St 50010 51,50010 51510,e,0 135.000oo 4397001 57.370.00 Solar GO 56,30000 1 1AE0.03 309rr33E 31550 84413E05 SS 1 5151301310 52550000 523+3100 5339.00 515000_.4, 53333.00004 517,580,40 5Y1,58400 57`..00000 515.000 4 13E3 1{3.1C ,54 EA a 550000 11,104,5 554000 53.75000 5100000 55 WO Co 00*500 51.6$13043 532000 04.53-313 5 *35330'4E04b 04SS053 Of 0402014, 50o0513401500V4110701 sr 1310 5400 55..0 CO 5309 54,50000 44044 1504000 5635 510,40940 5400 5555000 0 3717004At14('41 055Of,.. 3401133301 134. I MP. 51 10 5100 500540 5C 00 523000 535 CO 5340 Oa 51150 5814M1 54500 5350001 i PE5100E414131/533 E Or 5.1030 C033513151 CORA 500030.9 1t 00 51000 430400 5300 03,1000 53000 5e0800 01050 083010 55.00 5640 00 3 84A 13.33.N(151SPGSE Of E3354410 a 33433€31.4 35 if 1310 51100 52,15000 533130 52.33090 53000 5180040 51350 53150(0 all 00 4)99001 Y REMOVE 3.UCi3p0SE03 E051003 44141S0v 5E4v10AWE (k 010 5109 5351000 513a44 5,301000 55,00 5.334010 5535 311.04150 5310 55.63003 10 A€33015EAna 1P..05F 03 10r51.. 5t030.3 5E0039 0a0E LF 135 510013 54,250033 51804 53.350 Co 55033 5di5C8t 513_50 52.I5750 51100 St 32509 11 0€7•101E,5',004533301000153330 0301230 5130 K3.14044E 17 J 540000 0080000 500000 5030000 51,*0000 St.t#IOW V. 30 S5,35000 555001 53,11030 12 30040795130001004 at I4303,0 E 1.0*E071331 4F 311 51000 503000 55 CO 5 300 00 SS 00 510800 SA50 513000 SS 25 510400 11 AE1.1334110100634335E OF E5151114G 0041 IA 1 55880 55000 550044 55000 510500 5100 CO 53500 53K00 550031 1531. 11 51404.E 43441745514315440341 EA 3 5,5001 S25000 550000 51004 510000 41540 541540 55375 Oa 52W00 §750030 15 93040E030844131414541 E4 1 535000 Stwo 00 505000 53 Omou 510000 Saco Iv 43080) 11232.40 516080 554040 18 541,03500071300415 04140101 if I1,3 54031 55.15100 52uu 51500.09 5200 51,E04 0 55 75 57,410444 53.35 331 014,00 37 3.00E 133.33400NE511. 30445 03MS4101008E EA S 51,50000 515.0039.08 5203000 54400.00 420000 53.101 5434004 311404411 S-1NO 1 55,500 on 18 Ellll,Ti0Fknfa1. 557113R15(V.4RSE031.( EA 5 5450051 5; t5000 5LSO 00 51.000a 55080 52500 iv) S53415 51.7J.513 531000 51.1000 19 3,1313-843€5301195 749110 at 001144407k1 34 2 5'..51.00 110000n 5135500 3, 10300 51,00000 0.10005 51.35040 51,50295 500100 12.301100 _0 151t0750035103,31433 t 5E'.0E A 0'4)E, 4- 30005 L£ 34S 53030 531350.00 50650 514101350 550Co 591.25000 400 tJ 5441 la AS '41 SO 134333,50 21 1i'0V1, 50141554940317040'.330353331,10- 15'Ct€P 40 974 533.9) 556?00.00 53550 530,3.00 555 Ca 540,60004 45917 191<0040 58500 51414000 54 34•707 SOH 155A00M1RYSE0VE is Mut_ 15'-13,1- 0 333 4. 55 53000 5343t000 51400 44,2333-50 5100033 1550061 539 IF 05454345 5911? 55,00403 31 100C.00005473043, 5E6, 3015E. 0, 30' 4r3E3 44 355 59600 3..616 L04 S5500 530.03300 510)01 535.60000 3113.51 431440..4 09100 7-1 15"350.1.1.3.,174047 1E41103750'- 1o"74942 4F .0 59S CO 53000 Oa 5115 03 53140 TO 411500 53393111 511554 53.33900 510400 53,14003 25 10 540100 S04104 t041130000u3 Eh 1 5155,+3Ott 51230300 0S5 5.033 555740' 55 844.00 5500003 54 514 35 5101S45 58900 PO $431.161 _b 15'116' 1.E 8141C13 FA 5 $$56A0 _ 53,350 tb 33535U 053TS500 5750.k1 S315008 5519,35 $a,148< 's8400c 91.303r PO 04 5154E0015 1115 5E0.A41403-30.0 FA 0 53.530 CM 511300 CO 5333200 04540404 51504001 552400 CO 530536t 513.44415 43.351-00 574.70400 73 4'0054 381.133 30.001U:E£it No 03 12 013080 50E0 Oa 514500 51,93000 91u100 51.000 00 0151.13 51.933631 51319 033 04 5.409 IA 3.333333 t£I33E5 EA 4 01.310404 45.0000,3 34,6150,3 44.3500 1500410 550fM440 550,23I 55,021 32 1404. 61 538000 33 A134+334030141330ag3E FUu0VA1h'N 1,30 303A' 4Y 90 51006 51:. 05 520 Mt 5100004 51000 SStUM 50000 54356330 5;303 51 JSRA. 31 000Ei.13303473C91440000' Cl 44 S+S,t30 12,350033 SEO 0+3 51,030. 535141 51.t5n40 53300 521513. 449440 45,35001 33 0100011s I4 13.. 4350 53a8001 5200 53,54400 51+0 42 SRnm 5`_ 98 011005r, 5143 55,31573 33 4 1103001C011 L$ 1 04 3.00400 547 k 35060 4(39,0 00 5339,00000 5450,903(0 445050i pe 533531305 514535300 544001000 S.r.960Gtth2 01 S1}144110.7111.09 15 564100011 .5,05000 55945000 558,35030 5531 1A1400 514011. 550,90300 551,0300 555,090030 5554)400 3t .44.53P11A10141 IS 1 4253+,}13R. 5:5LSIp 00 .04 ft.., Sfr66a.14 SS0,4x*10p 551.cloo ao in,. h0 0. '50M IS/3300 00 S. 0.335 36 5,l00u143-10 FE0410131P0330 EA + 51,300 CO 53.{q1] 0<000u 32$4433 445101 560 00 4.5.1 470125411 51100.5 . 13.0 00 33 5535n,33 A0t10€i,STALLSY•SRea51Y.EA 4100t1 UPE 1n 3 51070W 33117.1a1 51180 M* 4. (33 }i+,510 51750a 519503*1 53v3,30 3 CO., c•03„3,S033na 33135 A001304103 O. 00003 w 4 w 33 r 333 33 3 u PROJECT SCHEDULE CITY OF LAKE E|M[l |'94L|FTSTATION (No.l) AND SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS PROJECT NO. 2016.134 ENGINEERING, inc. CamGeheren P.E. Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan StempskiP.s. Chad |saksun,P.E. O[TO8ER4,2D16 Council orders preparation ofPlans and Specifications and Awards Engineering Design and Construction Support Services Task Order. MARCH Zl,2Ol7 Council approves Plans and Specifications; orders adfor bids. APR|LI[\ 2017 Receive contractor bids. MAY 2,2O17 Council accepts bids and awards contract. MAY 1S,I0l7 Conduct Pre -construction meeting and issue Notice toProceed. OCTO8ER6,ZOI7 Substantial Completion; lift station online and operational. NOVEMBER3,IOl7 Final Completion; punch list and final paperwork. 11 1 NC1TY OF LAKE ELMO STAFF REPORT DATE: 5/2/17 REGULAR ITEM #: 6 TO: City Council FROM: Stephen Wensrnan, Planning Director AGENDA ITEM: Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Preliminary Plat/PUD REVIEWED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator Sarah Sonsalla, City Attorney Emily Becker, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief Mike Bent, Building Official BACKGROUND: HC Golf Course Development made application for preliminary plat and preliminary planned unit development (PUD) plans on 2/10/2017. The Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 13, 2017 and recommended approval on March 27, 2017. The City has 120 days to complete its review of the preliminary plat, therefore the City Council is required to make a determination by June 10, 2017. The City Council should not approve the preliminary plat until the Metropolitan Council has reviewed the comprehensive plan amendment that will allow the development to proceed. The Metropolitan Council's Community Development Committee meets on May 15'1' and the Metropolitan Council will meet on May 24'1'. Staff is not recommending any action on this agenda item tonight. The purpose of the meeting is to allow the Council to review the application and to provide feedback to the developer if warranted. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: The issue is to review the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and PUD plans, but not to approve or deny them. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Since the Planning Commission review, City Staff requested the developer update his preliminary plat and PUD plans to address some of the comments and issues raised prior to and during the Planning Commission meeting. Although it is not customary to request changes prior to City Council review, there were a number of issues that Staff felt were potentially critical to the preliminary plat layout. Many of the issues related to the Valley Branch Watershed District review as it pertains to the floodplain replacement and the stonnwater modelling in the northeast portion of the development and the lift station site designs. The developer submitted revised plans to the VBWD for their review and to the City on April 10, 2017, in conjunction with the phase 1 grading permit application. As of the writing of this report, the VBWD has not completed its review of the resubmitted preliminary plans. Until the VBWD review is substantially complete and the VBWD key issues are addressed, the City cannot complete its review. In addition, the City will be retaining BMI to design the 3 lift stations proposed to serve this development. Therefore the City has retained BMI to review the proposed lift station site plans to verify whether the developer's City Council Meeting April 2, 2017 Regular Agenda item # proposed outlots are of adequate size and configuration. At the time of the writing of this report, BM1's review was not complete. The updated plans received on April 10, 2017 addressed several of the conditions of preliminary plat recommended by the Planning Commission: Condition #2: Lots 1, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 1 were combined into a single lot - combining the area for future "cottages" with the clubhouse lot. Condition #3: Providing frontage for Lot 1, Block 1 onto 20' Street N — giving the clubhouse street frontage without having to pass into a park property, Condition #15: An 8 ft. concrete public trail was provided in the right-of-way in front of Lots I -11, Block 13. Condition #18: Sidewalks were provided along one side of all streets except for Street C (Annie Avenue). Additionally, the revised plans show revisions to the proposed lots on Annie Avenue discussed during the 3/27 Planning Commission meeting. FISCAL IMPACT: The fiscal impact will be determined with the developer agreement after final plat approval. OPTIONS: None, the City Council should review the preliminary plat/preliminary PUD plans and take no action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending no action be taken at tonight's meeting, however, the City Council can ask questions of the developer or staff and can provide feedback to the developer if it is warranted. ATTACHMENTS: • Planning Commission report for 3/13/17 • Planning Commission report for 3/27/17 • Planning Commission minutes 3/13/17 • Planning Commission minutes 3/27/16 • RGC at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and plans submitted 4.10.17 Page 2 STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 03/13/2017 AGENDA ITEM: 4c & 4D— PUBLIC HEARING CASE # 2017-07 TO: Planning Commission FROM: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Map Amendment to Golf Course Community, and the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans REVIEWED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director Emily Becker, City Planner Mike Bent, Building Official Jack Griffin, City Engineer Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief Kristina Handt, City Administrator Sarah Sonsalla, City Attorney BACKGROUND: HC Golf Course Development is requesting approval of: 1. A zoning map amendment rezoning from PF — Public Facilities to GCC — Golf Course Community; and 2. Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo golf course/residential development. The Royal Golf Course Planned Unit Development is being proposed for the former 3M Tartan Park properties in Lake Elmo. The former 3M Tartan Park property was purchased from 3M in March, 2016. The Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo received Concept PUD Plan approval on September 6, 2016. A Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved on January 9, 2017 by the City Council contingent on Metropolitan Council approval and Preliminary Plat approval. An Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) was prepared and the City Council gave a negative declaration for an Enviromnental Impact Statement (EIS) on January 17, 2017. The applicant applied for a zoning text amendment creating the GCC zoning district which was approved on February 7, 2017. The GCC zoning district is the district that corresponds to the new comprehensive land use guidance for the properties. The former Tartan Park properties are currently zoned PF-Public Facilities and to develop the property into a golf course/residential development, the applicant is requesting a rezoning to the new GCC — Golf Course Community Zoning District to be consistent with the new comprehensive plan designation. If the rezoning is approved, the GCC regulations will be base zoning district which will be used to evaluate the PUD development and to evaluate any proposed deviations from the base zoning regulations. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 2 The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development is being proposing to redevelopment of the 27-hole golf course and recreational facility into and 8-hole golf course with 292 single family residential lots and corresponding open space. The City can review the preliminary plat, but it cannot be approved until the Metropolitan Council approves the Comprehensive Plan. ISSUE BEFORE THE COMMISSION: The issue before the Commission is review and make recommendations to the City Council on: 1) A zoning map amendment, rezoning the fonner Tartan Park from PF to GCC; and 2) The Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo. GENERAL INFORMATION: Applicant: Property Owner: Location: Request: HC Golf Course Development, LLC HC Golf Course Development, LLC, 11074 Radisson Road NE, Blaine, MN 55449 Former 3M Tartan Park, PIDs: 25-029-21-12-0001, 25-029-21-13-0001, 25- 029-21-14-0001, 25-029-21-21-0001, 25-029-21-31-0001, 25-029-21-42- 0001, 25-029-21-43-0001, 25-029-21-43-0002, and 25-029-21-44-0002 Zoning Map Amendment to GCC Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans approval Development Site Area: +/-428.06 acres Land Use Guidance: Current Zoning: Proposed Zoning: Surrounding Zoning: History: Public/Park PF-Public Facility GCC/PUD-Golf Course Comrnunity/Planned Unit Development OP and Rural Single Family to the southwest, Rural Single Family and Rural Residential to the North, Rural Single Family, Rural Residential and West Lake Land Township to the east. Tartan Park was purchased by HC Golf Course Development, LLC in March of 2016. A Concept PUD Plan was approved on September 6, 2016. Comprehensive Plan Amendment was approved on January 11, 2017 by the City Council contingent on Metropolitan Council approval and Preliminary Plat Approval, EAW negative declaration by the Council was on January 17, 2017, Zoning Text Amendment creating the GCC Zoning was approved on February 7, 2017. PUBLICHEARING ITEM 4c & 4d DeadlineDeadlinefor Action• Applicable Code: Application Complete — 2/10/17 60 Day Deadline — 4/11/17 Extension Letter Mailed — No 120 Day Deadline — 6/10/17 Article XII — Urban Residential Districts Article XVIII — Planned Unit Development Regulations Chapter 153 — Subdivision Regulations §150.270 Storm Water, Erosion, and Sediment Control PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: The Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo is a unique development designed to incorporate a the renovation of the former 27- hole 3M Tartan Park into an 18-hole golf course and 292 single family residential development on roughly 428 acres. The proposed development is within the Shorelands of Lake Elmo, Rose, Downs and Horseshoe Lakes, requiring the development to be compliant with the City's shoreland ordinance and developed as a Planned Unit Development. The area recently received approval from the City Council for a comprehensive plan amendment guiding the property from Public/Park to Golf Course Community and the inclusion of the land area into the City's (MUSA) Municipal Urban Service Area, subject to Metropolitan Council approval and contingent on the approval of the Preliminary Plat. The Royal Golf Club Concept PUD Plans were approved on September 9, 2017 with recorrunendations for changes. Since the Concept PUD Plans, the developer has incorporated many of the recommendations into this preliminary plat submittal. The most notable changes include: • A provision for access to the south connecting the residential development to 10'1' Street. • A provision for a public trail connection from 10111 Street to 20th Street. • Elimination of cul-de-sacs exceeding City ordinance. • Additional access from 20'1' Street to the east neighborhood • Elimination of 11 lots in the area east of Homestead and north of Tartan Meadows. • Connection of the NW neighborhood to the west -central neighborhood while leaving a 100' green corridor. • Removal of 19 lots (cul-de-sac) in the Lake Elmo shoreland in the NW portion of the site. Zoning Map Amendment The Tartan Park property is currently zoned PF — Public Facilities, Based on the recently approved comprehensive plan amendment, the property is now guided as Golf Course Community. The corresponding zoning district is the recently approved GCC — Golf Course Community district. In order for the development to proceed, the property needs to be rezoned to GCC to be consistent with the comprehensive plan. The GCC will be the based zoning district to which the development will be reviewed against. Subsequent to the rezoning, and with the preliminary plat, the applicant is applying for Preliminary PUD Plan approval. The PUD is an overlay zoning. With the PUD Plans, the developer is requesting some deviations, or flexibility from the GCC regulations as part of the preliminary plat and PUD submittal, which if approved will be the overlay regulations that apply to specifically to this development or PUD. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 4 Preliminary Plat/PUD Plans Site Data. The Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo consists of an 18-hole golf club and a residential development of 292 single family homes over 428.06 acres. The residential portion of the development is over 231.25 acres. The lots average size is 13,499 sq. ft. with the largest lot being 38,814 sq. ft. and the smallest, 6,600 sq. ft. in size. The minimum lots size allowed in the GCC zoning district is 9,000 sq. ft. Total Site Area Residential Site Area Outlot Area Right -of -Way Wetlands Residential Lot Area Golf Course Lot Area Gross Density Net Density 428.06 acres 231.25 acres 288.78 acres 37.61 acres 19.71 acres 90.49 acres 11.18 acres .068 du/acre 1.56 du/acre The calculation of net density is as follows: Development Area 10'1' Street Right -of -Way Lake Elmo Avenue Right -of -Way Wetlands Wetland Buffers Open Water (area of easement) Park Trail Easement Bluff Floodway Net Residential Area Total Number of Lots Net Density 231.25 acres 2.88 acres 2.82 acres 19.71 acres 9.81 acres 1.61acres 6.66 acres 0.85 acres 186.92 acres 292 units 1.56 du/acre Planned Unit Development Overlay. The Royal Golf development is required by the shoreland regulations to develop as a Planned Unit Development. The intent of the shoreland PUD is to allow flexibility from strict zoning provisions by allowing residential density to transfer away from the shoreland in tiers, allowing density transfer away from the DNR designated water body. The PUD allows the flexibility for this transfer of density such as allowing smaller lot sizes. PUDs can also provide flexibility from other zoning district regulations such as, setbacks, impervious surfaces, etc. The PUD zoning regulations are a negotiation intended to provide more creativity and higher quality design in exchange for the flexibility. According to the Royal Golf application narrative the developer is requesting PUD flexibility from the underlying zoning regulations: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 5 1. To allow a single driveway entrance to the clubhouse on the golf course. "). To allow smaller lot sizes for some villa lots, less than the 9,000 required by zoning. 3. To allow impervious surfaces on some lots greater than the 30% maximum allowed by zoning. 4. To allow 20 foot front yard setbacks for villa lots (the underlying zoning district requires 25'). 5. To allow the "trail" in the front yards to be 6 feet wide rather than 8 feet. 6. To allow R/W to be 50 feet wide for Street C for a villa enclave, rather than the 60' standard width. 7. To allow 4 subdivision signs rather than the 2 allowed by ordinance. The developer would also like to have up to 6 neighborhood identification to identify the villa enclaves. 8 To allow streets without sidewalks in two areas in the development, whereas the street standards require sidewalks on one side of the street. 9. To allow garages greater than 1,000 sq. ft. as a perniitted use. The developer is accepting of other restrictions on garages, such as limiting the amount of garage facing a public street. In addition to the items identified by the developer, Staff is suggesting the PUD flexibility be used to address other issues within the Preliminary Plat/Preliminary PUD Plans: 1. To allow an alternative to tree replacement required by the Tree Preservation Plan. 2. To waive some of the landscape requirements in exchange for enhanced forest management and landscape screening as needed. Each of these is discussed further in the Staff report below. Any special overlay regulations approved by the Council will be codified within the City Council's Resolution of approval. Shoreland Evaluation. As stated above, the Royal Golf Course development is within the shorelands of Lake Elmo, Rose, Downs and Horseshoe Lakes, requiring the development to be compliant with the City's shoreland ordinance and developed as a Planned Unit Development. The Royal Golf residential development proposes 100 units within the shorelands with 59.9% of the shoreland to be left as open space, protected by a conservation easement. The development protects steep slopes and shoreland impact zones of Lake Elmo and Downs Lake and the shoreland impact zones of Lake Rose and Horseshoe Lake will be at least 70% open space. The shorelands were evaluated according to the DNR's rules. The developer divided the shoreland into tiers based on the DNR's tier dimensions. Suitable areas were calculated by subtracting regulated wetlands and bluffs from shoreland areas. Suitable areas were divided by required lot sizes to calculate the allowable density for each tier. Proposed densities were tallied from the number of lots on the Site Plan (See Table 1). Open space was calculated by subtracting areas of street right-of-ways, residential lots, and the entry monument lot from total shoreland areas (See Table 2.) PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 6 Table 1. Overall Shoreland Density Evaluation Total Area Regulated Net Suitable Required Allowable Bluffs Proposed Shoreland Wetlands Lot Size Base Sq. Ft. Acres (sq.ft.) (sq.11.) Sq. Ft. Acres (sq. ft.) Density Density Lake 1,240,208 28.47 2,057 39,287 1,198,864 27.52 15,000 79.9 21 Downs Lake 338,333 7.77 27,364 0 310,969 7.141 20,000 15.5 3 Lake Rose 1,799,640 41.31 16,443 0 1,783,197 40.941 20,000 89.2 41 Horseshoe 886,313 20.35 12,032 0 874,281 20.0 20,000 43.7 35 Total 4,264,494 97.90 57,896 39,287 4,167,311 95.67j 228,3 100 Table 2. Overall Shoreland Open Space Calculation Not Open Space ShorelandNet Total Street Open % Open Area Lots Right -of- Space Space (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Way (sq.ft.) (sq.ft.) Lake Elmo 1,240,208 317,994 179,618 742,596 59.9 Downs Lake 338,333 27,048 78,225 233,060 68.9 Lake Rose 1,799,640 506,747 377,169 915,724 50.9 Horseshoe Lake 886,313 507,334 117,552 261,427 29.5 Total 4,264,494 1,359,123 752,564 2,152,807 50.5 Since the Concept phase, the developer has (see Figure 1): • reduced the overall shoreland density from 111 to 100 single-family lots, resulting in a PUD that has only 44% of the allowed residential density; • Removing 10 residential lots and the related street from the Lake Elmo shoreland to increase protection of steep slopes, open space, and natural communities; • Increased the open space proportion of the Lake Elmo shoreland from 49.8 to 59.9%; • Improved street connectivity and community connectivity in the Lake Elmo and Downs Lake shorelands; • Decreased the residential density of the Downs Lake shoreland from 7 to 3 residential lots and increasing the open space proportion of the Downs Lake shoreland from 52.3% to 68.9%; • Refined the residential design of the Lake Rose shoreland to reduce the depth of selected lots and increase the open space; and • Removed the narrow ribbon of open space previously proposed along the shoreline of Horseshoe Lake on the golf course portion of the development from the calculation, yet still exceeded the minimum requirements. The DNR allows the required open space to preserved across the entire shoreland area and not specific to any single shoreland within the development. The development barely meets the minimum shoreland openspace requirement, however, the developer has exceeded the required open space in the most pristine shoreland of Lake Elmo, protecting the trees, slopes and desireable wildlife corridor. The development exceeds the minimum 50% open space PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d requirement in all but the Horseshoe Lake shoreland which brings the average down. The Horseshoe Lake, Downs Lake and Rose Lake shorelands all have very degraded woodlands and much of which is existing golf course. Figure 1 — Shoreland Tieri pacts 7 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d Lot Sizes. The lots within the development will have a range of widths and lengths with the villa lots being the smallest, and the custom-built golf course lots being the largest. Typically, the villa lots will have two different sized lots, 55 ft. wide and 65 ft. wide. The average lot size is 13,499 sq. ft. with the largest lot being 38,814 sq. ft. and the smallest, 6,600 sq. ft. in size. The minimum lots size allowed in the GCC zoning distict is 9,000 sq. ft. Although some of the villa lots are less than 9,000 sq. ft. in size, it is the intent of the shoreland PUD to allow density to tier away from the shoreland transferring this density. Therefore, the smaller lots are consistent with the intent of the shoreland ordinance and the purpose of the shoreland PUD. On average the residential lots within the development exceed the minimum requirements of the GCC Zoning District. GCC District Setbacks. The GCC zoning district establishes setbacks as: Front — 25 feet House side — 10 feet Garage side — 5 feet Corner side-15 feet Rear — 20 feet Consistent with the other urban districts, the City allows the side yard setbacks to be averaged such that each side has a minimum 7.5 feet in lieu of the 5 ft. / 10 ft. side yard setbacks provided there are no encroachments into drainage and utility easements. The 7.5 ft. setback have proven to be problematic for builders planning for egress windows in basements in some instances. The developer/builder will need to be aware of the "no encroachment" policy. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility to allow the front setbacks for proposed homes with some villa lots to be 20 feet from the front property line in instances when the garages are side -loaded and not facing the public street. Staff is comfortable with the request, because with a side loaded garage, there should be adequate space in the driveway to allow a car to be parked without encroachment into the public right-of-way, provided the garages are adorned with windows or other architectural features are part of the architecture for sides of garages facing the public R/W. The proposed Royal Golf Club PUD proposes the following setbacks for their development: Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Planned Setbacks 100 Ft. Wide Lots 80-90 Ft. Wide Lots Front 30 ft. 30 ft. Side 15 ft. 10 ft. Corner Side 15 ft. Rear 30 ft. 55-65 Ft. Wide Lots 20 ft. for side loaded garages, or 25' 7.5 ft. 15 ft. 15 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. For the most part, the Royal Golf Club's planned setbacks exceed the setbacks in the GCC zoning district. As is typical, some encroachments into the side setback will be allowed for bump -outs, egress windows, and eaves, as defined by the Code, but in no case will the encroachment be allowed in the drainage and utility easements. The developer and builders will need to plan accordingly. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 9 Impervious Surfaces. The allowed impervious surfaces within the GCC district is 30% of the lot area. This is consistent with the impervious surfaces allowed per lot within the shoreland. The developer is unsure as the actual impervious surface amount that will be needed, but they anticipate it will need to be greater on the smaller villa lots. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility for an increase in the impervious surface maximums for the villa products, up to 40% impervious, consistent with the LDR zoning. Staff supports this request and recommends approval of a 40% impervious for the smaller villa lots within the development. Sidewalks. The City's standard street detail requires a 6 ft wide public sidewalk be constructed on one side of any public street and to accommodate a sidewalk, the standard right-of-way width is 60 feet wide. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility and has identified several areas where they wish to forgo the public sidewalk requirement. The areas are: • Along Street C -The developer has proposed a 50 foot right-of-way for this street which limits the ability to construct a public sidewalk. According to the developer, the right-of- way was narrowed from 60 feet to 50 feet to increase the buffer along the east edge of the development and to preserve trees. This request would impact 18 lots that front on the Street. • Along Street K cul-de-sac. The cul-de-sac is short and the request would impact 9 lots. The right-of-way is 60 feet wide and is adequate right-of-way to install a sidewalk. • Along the cul-de-sac end of Street A. This request would impact 10 lots. There is adequate right-of-way proposed to accommodate a public sidewalk. • Along Street H — This request would impact 17 lots. There is adequate right-of-way to accommodate a public sidewalk. The street is very curvilinear which also makes for poor site -lines and a perceived nan-owing of the street. In general, staff is not supportive of the elimination of the public sidewalk requirement on any of the above streets; except for Street C; the developer has provided a narrower right-of-way in order to maximize lot creation in an area squeezed between the planned golf course and the property boundary. Staff is willing to compromise by allowing Street C to be constructed without a sidewalk. Garages. The GCC district allows a 1,000 sq. ft. maximum for an attached garage and larger with a conditional use permit. The developer is seeking PUD flexibility from this requirement as they anticipate many homes will have 4-stall garages. The developer feels the additional garage area is necessary as many of the homes will have golf carts to shelter in addition to cars. This increase will not increase the amount of garage face to house face allowed. The developer intends to comply with the requirement that the garage door will not exceed 60% of the principal building facade fronting the primary street. Staff is agreeable to this request provided that the lot coverage requirements are complied with and that an upper limit be established. Staff recommends an upper limit of 1,300 sq. ft. Buffers. The GCC district regulations require a minimum 100 ft. buffer from external residential lots within the City of Lake Elmo residential properties. The proposed development exceeds this requirement. The locations where the development is closest to adjacent residential lots are as follows: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 10 Lot 6, Block 9 is 310 ft. to the nearest Tartan Meadows lot Lots 4-7, Block 10 are 100 ft. to the nearest Tartan Meadows lot Lots 6-14, Block 14 are 150 ft. to the nearest Homestead lot Lot 13, Block 17 and Lot 1, Block 18 are 100 ft. to the nearest Schwartz Martinco Addition lots. Lot 1, Block 2 is 190 ft. from the Eden Park 2' Addition Lots Parks and Trails. The City's park dedication ordinance, Section 153.14 requires parkland dedication, up to 10% of the development area, or a park dedication fee in lieu of park land. The golf course portion of the development is essentially unchanged from a land use perspective; it remains a golf course, so it is being excluded from the park dedication requirements. The Parks Commission reviewed the Royal Golf development and recognizes the golf course provides a significant recreational amenity that will serve this future development. In previous meetings discussing the development, the Commission discussed the need for a playground in the development, but that the need could be fulfilled by an HOA facility. The developer is considering an HOA tot lot for Outlot R, although no specific equipment or design for Outlot R has been provided. The Parks Commission endorsed the north -south trail corridor through the development including the short segment that will be within the front yards of Lots 4-12, Block 16 (9 lots). The Commission was asked whether the trail segment should be 6 ft. or 8 ft. wide and the consensus was that it should be 8 ft. wide, or that the trail segment might be located on -street (the developer is requesting 6 ft. wide trail per PUD flexibility). This trail segment has been located on the right- of-way because of severe topography and the desire to save trees. Except for in the right-of-way in front of these 9 lots and in the Street D right-of-way south of Outlot T, the developer is proposing dedicating 6.65 acres of park land within Outlots B and T. Typically, the city requires a 30 ft. wide park area centered on the trail. The proposed trail dedication area is not centered on the trail in some areas and it includes areas of wetland buffer. A six foot mow strip should be maintained along all public trails. Staff recommends that the parkland dedication be given for only a 30 ft. wide con-idor centered on the trail, but not including any area that is wetland or wetland buffer. The developer will also be constructing the trail with each corresponding phase of the development. The phasing of trail construction needs to be clarified. The trail corridor park land dedication and the cost of constructing the public trails will be deducted from any fees in lieu of park land dedication. As allowed by ordinance, the City will be hiring an appraiser to determine the market value of the development land for the purposes of deten-nining the park dedication fee. The cost of the appraisal shall be paid by the developer as per City Ordinance. The City/County Comprehensive Trails Plans show the need for trails along 10th, 20th and Lake Elmo Avenue. The trails within the development are intended to provide the access along 20th and Lake Elmo Avenue as it is unclear whether trails could be provided along these collector roadways without significant impact to existing trees and without significant grading and stormwater impacts. Washington County is not requesting any dedication for trails, nor requiring any trails. The developer will also be widening the 20th Street shoulder to accommodate the need for bike and pedestrian access to the roadway. In addition to the public trails on the site, there are roughly 2 miles of HOA owned nature and exercise trails in the northwest corner of the site, Outlot DD, that remain from the former Tartan Park, PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 11 Open Space. The shoreland ordinance requires shoreland PUDs to set aside a minimum of 50% of the shoreland area as protected open space. The Royal Golf development proposes to set aside 2,152,807 sq. ft., or 49.42 acres (50.5%) of the shoreland within the residential portion of the site as protected open space. In addition to the shoreland open space the plat will include 182 acres of golf course area (Outlots C and D) and outlots containing wetlands, wetland buffers, easements and landscape outlots. The total combined open space on the site is 288.60, which represents 67% of the plat area. Restrictive Covenants. The development will be encumbered by a number of restrictive covenants for the benefit of the residents including architectural guidelines, use restrictions, exterior storage requirements, vehicle parking (RV, etc). In addition, the open space within the shoreland is required to be protected with a conservation easement. The developer is proposing to develop the HOA documents incorporating any concerns that might arise during the development review process and submitting them prior to final plat for approval. Subdivision Signs. Section 154.212 allows a maximum of 2 subdivisions signs per residential development with a maximum sign area of 24 sq. ft. per sign. The developer is requesting PUD flexibility from this regulation in order to allow four subdivision signs. In addition to the subdivision signs, the developer would like to install up to 6 neighborhood markers to identify the villa enclaves within the development. These neighborhood markers will consist of 2 ft x 2 ft pillars with the Royal Golf Course Logo and the name of the neighborhood. The development is unique due to its size and the number of access points onto adjacent collector roadway, therefore, Staff believes the request for flexibility has merit. The subdivision signs would be located at the intersection of Street a and 20th Street, at the Clubhouse entrance, at Lake Elmo Ave, and another about 600 feet north of the south entrance on Street D. Streets. The Royal Golf development is proposing new streets A -I. The streets are all proposed to have the standard 60 ft. right-of-way width with the exception of Street C on the east side in the villa area, and near entrances to accommodate landscaped islands, and turnlanes. The City's Engineering Standards show a standard street right-of-way to be 60 feet wide to accommodate a six foot sidewalk on one side, a 28 ft wide back-to-back paved surface, and street trees, all with proper setbacks from each other for safety and maintenance considerations. The developer is requesting 50 ft. wide rights -of -way for Street C without a sidewalk on one side. The need for right-of-way width is determined by the improvements being installed in the right-of-way. If no sidewalk is required, then a 50 foot right-of-way is sufficient. The City Engineer has identified issues related to street width to accommodate landscaped medians, trails and turnlanes near the development entrances. The developer will also need to update the Typical Street Sections in the preliminary plat submittal to accurately depict the proposed street right-of-ways in the development. Street Parking. All streets within the development are proposed to be 28 feet wide, back to back, except where lanes are separated by a median. Other than where there are medians, the 28 foot wide streets will accommodate parking on both sides of the street. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d Street Names. The developer is proposing a unique theme for street naming within the development as allowed in the most recent update to the City's street naming ordinance. Staff has reviewed the proposed street names and finds them to be consistent with the ordinance. Architecture. The Royal Golf Course residential development contemplates a range of single family homes providing a range of lifestyle choices and price points, from HOA maintained villa products to high -end custom homes. The villas are in 5 different neighborhood areas, 3 on the west side of the golf course and 2 on the east. The villa homes are anticipated to have 1,800-2,000 sq. ft. of floor area on the main level and full basements. The neighborhood toward the south of the development is intended to have a new housing type for "new families on the go" that will be two stories, but HOA maintained. The developer has suggested that there will be an architectural review committee that will approve all house plans in accordance with a prescribed set of architectural guidelines including 4-sided architecture, minimum roof pitches and materials, wrapped windows and doors, Hardie -board siding and Anderson Windows. The developer anticipates up to 7 custom builders for the traditional homes and 2-3 for the villas. Tree Preservation. The developer has submitted a tree preservation plan as required. The tree replacement plan is based on individual surveyed trees and areas where tree density and type are determined by random tree plots. Staff reviewed the tree plots and has determined the methodology to be consistent with City Code. Staff has also reviewed the grading for the site to deten-nine whether grading the site differently, for instance, creating lookout lots rather than walkout lots to save trees. The developer has already done a relatively decent job determining the types of homes for each lot to minimize grading and tree removal. All the lots will be custom graded with the hope of minimizing tree loss during the building permit stage of the project. The Developer is interpreting the development as a "mixed -use" development in order to use the tree replacement for required landscaping. Staff has interpreted the City code such that the development is not a mixed use development (commercial/residential), but rather it's essentially an open space/recreation/residential development. The commercial aspect of the clubhouse is accessory to the golf course. This interpretation is consistent with the City Attorney's interpretation (see attached email). Furthermore, the due to the quantity of forest on the site, it is has been difficult for the developer to develop the site without significant tree removal. The tree replacement has become an issue because it is difficult to find suitable placement for all the required trees. Staff is recommending PUB flexibility from the tree preservation ordinance such that the developer receives some credit for forest management and establishment of pollinator friendly native seeding. In the northwest portion of the development, there exists a mature oak forest, however, the understory has been increasingly choked out by invasive specifies. By managing the understory, removing buckthorn and other species, and introducing native grasses, the forest will likely be able to regenerate and result in a more sustainable landscape than simply requiring tree replacement trees. Landscaping. The developer has submitted preliminary landscape plans as required; however, until the tree preservation requirements are established, it is difficult to determine the overall landscape requirements. Landscape Walls. Throughout the development, the developer has proposed landscape walls to control grades. These walls cross residential property lines and HOA property and some are shown PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d I 3 within public rights -of -ways and City outlots. Staff recommends that any walls that cross residential property lines or residential property lines and HOA property be owned and maintained by the HOA. Staff also recommends that the walls shown within City Outlets and Rights -of -way be moved to HOA owned outlots, or maintained by the HOA. Golf Cart Friendly Neighborhood. Central to the developer's golf course community concept is to have all of the development accessible by golf cart. According to the developer, they would like to have golf carts be allowed on internal public streets and the off-street trails that connect the neighborhood to the club house, some of which are to be public trails. No golf cart access is proposed for sidewalks, or trails that do not connect to the clubhouse. The city's current ordinances do not allow for the use of golf carts on public streets or trails. The developer is interested in pursuing an ordinance that would permit such use on public streets and trails, often referred to as a "slow moving vehicle ordinance" Emerson Property and 10th Street Access. The access to 10th Street was achieved through negotiation with Terry Emerson, the property owner to the south-east. The negotiated agreement will result in a land swap with Outlot P being transferred to Mr. Emerson in exchange for the Street D access onto 10th Street and Outlot N. Mr. Emerson has granted permission to have this portion of his property to be included in the preliminary plat with his signature on the preliminaiy plat application. Access to 10' Street should be a condition of preliminary plat. Development Phasing/Grading Phasing. The developer is planning to begin the first phase of the development on the east side along with a small portion in the south-west corner of the development. Al! of the first phase utilities will be contained in Phase 1 except for a sewer force main along 10'1' Street and its intersection with Lake Elmo Ave and a watermain along the south side of 20'1' Street to its intersection with Lake Elmo Ave. The grading phasing is being driven by the need to provide public sere and water to the clubhouse within 2 years of its opening, which is expected to be the summer of 2017. The pace of the phasing will be determined by market demand, but future phases are expected to proceed from the from the south-west corner to 20th Street. Further discussions related to phasing are needed with such a large development as it pertains to public infrastructure such as streets, utilities and trails. The approximate timing of phasing is: Phase 1, 2017 Phase 2, 2019 Phase 3, 2021 Phase 4 — 2023 Grading, Stormwater Management and Storm Sewer System Improvements. The City Engineer provided comment on the grading, stormwater management and storm sewer system improvements and raised a number of issues that may require changes to the preliminary plat (See Engineer's report dates March 8, 2017) including: Pond 60 on Outlet V Pond 60 on Outlet V proposes stem water pending over the existing dual gas pipeline and easement area, It is the City's understanding that this improvement will not be allowed as proposed and if allowed would pose undue maintenance and ownership burden on the City. The plans should be revised to remove this encroachment or the applicant must provide written correspondence to the City from the gas main utility owner stating that the proposed improvements are acceptable as proposed including no ongoing maintenance restrictions to the City. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d I 4 • Revisions to the Preliminary Plat may be required for the plat to obtain VBWD and State stormwater permit approvals. Sewer Utility Lift Stations. Outlots M, N and EE do not appear to be adequate for City owned/maintained lift stations. Preliminary Plat approval should be contingent upon expanding Outlots M, N, and EE, or otherwise revising the Preliminary Plat/Plans to the City's satisfaction such that the proposed sanitary lift station sites are acceptable to the City's lift station consulting engineer and Public Works staff. Outlots. • Outlots E, H. M, N, V, W, AA, EE, GG and HH contain stormwater ponds, infiltration basins, sanitary lift stations and utility easement and should be dedicated to the City with the plat. • Outlots B ancl T contain public trails and should be dedicated to the City for parkland with the plat (see parkland dedication). Transportation Improvements. The City Engineer's report dated March 8, 2017 includes the following review comments related to required right-of-way dedication and improvements for transportation: • 40 feet of R/W is being dedicated along the entire length of 20th Street. • 50-55 ft. of R/W is being dedicated along Manning Trail North within the city limits. • An additional 17' of right-of-way is required along 10th Street north. • Turnlane improvements are required at Street D and Street E at intersections with County roads meeting Washington County standards and paid for solely by the developer. • The City requires right turnlanes meeting City State Aid design standards along 20th Street North at Streets E, J, A, the golf course entrance and Manning Trail to be paid for soley by the developer. No turnlanes are required at the Manning Trail/Street B intersection. HOA Fitness Center. Near the golf course clubhouse, on the west side of the parking lot on Lot 2, Block 1, the developer has proposed a private fitness center and swimming pool that will be HOA owned and maintained. The fitness center is a conditional use, so prior to any construction; a conditional use permit will be required. Access to the lot will utilize the clubhouse entrance drive and parking lot. A cross access easement will be needed between the clubhouse and HOA to ensure access to the property which will be under different ownership than the golf club. Golf Course Amenities. • Cottages. The developer and owner of the golf club has suggested that there may be up to four "cottages" to be located to the east of the golf club parking lot on what is labeled as Lot 3, Block 1. Based on images provided of cottages found on other golf courses outside the city, the cottages will be more or less entertainment homes for the private use of the golf club owners and guests. The use in the GCC zoning district will be regulated as Semi - Transient Accommodations, which are an accessory conditional use. Because they use is allowed only as an accessory to the club house, the clubhouse and the cottages need to be on the same platted lot. The preliminary plat will need to be revised such that Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 1 are combined. Staff believes this is important so that once constructed the cottages remain under ownership of the golf club and cannot be sold off separately. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 15 Clubhouse and Access. The former 3M Tartan Park clubhouse is presently being renovated. The renovation began prior to the platting process. The renovated club house uses will remain essentially the same and will include a restaurant and pro -shop. An intensification of the site or use will require a conditional use permit. Access to the clubhouse is via a single driveway; the secondary entrance was displaced by residential development. The City code requires two entrances. The developer has modified the single entrance by introducing an island which divides the drivelanes. The Building Official and Fire Chief Staff have no objections to a single entrance as the clubhouse will be have fire suppression sprinklers installed. Staff is therefore recommending flexibility to the requirements to allow a single entrance to the clubhouse. Golf Course. The fonner 3M Tartan Park golf course was a 27-hole facility that is being transformed into an public 18-hole facility with a driving range. The developer has suggested that there will also be a small par 3 youth course. During the concept phase, the developer indicated that this course would be open to the public for no charge. The excess land being developed into the residential development. Maintenance Building. The fonner 3M Tartan Park golf course maintenance building will remain in its current location and purpose and is shown to be located on Lot 1, Block 1. Parking. The parking for the clubhouse will serve the clubhouse restaurant, proshop, golf course, HOA fitness center and cottages. At present, no additional parking has been provided or planned for other than what existed with the fonner 3M Tartan Park clubhouse. With any expansion to the clubhouse, cottages, or fitness center, a conditional use pennit will be required and the need for parking will be evaluated among other items. A cross access easement will be required between the HOA and the club house owners to ensure access to both over the clubhouse entrance drive and parking lot. HOA/Clubhouse Trails. There are trails owned by the golf course and trails owned by the HOA. A cross access easement is needed between the HOA and the golf course to allow the HOA to access the clubhouse over the trails. PRELIMINARY PLAT RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL Staff recommends the Planning Commission reconunend approval of the preliminary plat and preliminary KID plan approval with the following suggested conditions: 1. That cross access easements be recorded between the owner of the golf course/golf club and the HOA to permit HOA and resident access to the future fitness center, clubhouse and other amenities by the HOA residents over the clubhouse entrance drive and parking lot and trails. That the preliminary plat be revised such that the Lot 1, Block 1 and Lot 3, Block 1 are combined into a single lot. That the preliminary plat be revised such that Lot 1, Block 1 has frontage onto 20`1' Street without crossing through the public park on Outlot B. 4. Any expansion to the Royal Golf Club clubhouse or intensification of its use shall require a conditional use permit. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 16 5. That there shall be no encroachments to drainage and utility easements on residential lots other than those reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and upon execution of an easement encroachment agreement. 6. That the developer prepare an exhibit that clearly identifies the proposed setbacks for specific lots within the development. 7. That the PUD overlay zoning allow for the following: a. Setbacks: Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Setbacks 100 Ft. Wide Lots 80-90 Ft. Wide Lots 55-65 Ft. Wide Lots Front 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. for side loaded garages, or 25' Side 15 ft. 10 ft. 7.5 ft. Corner 15 ft. 15 ft. 15 Side Rear 30 ft. 30 ft. 20 ft. b. Maximum Impervious Coverage: The maximum impervious coverage for 55-65' wide lots shall be 40%. All other lots shall have a maximum impervious coverage of 30%. c. Lot Sizes: The minimum lot size for Villa lots (55-65' wide) in the development shall he 6,600 sq. ft. d. Attached Garages: That attached garages shall not exceed 1,300 sq. ft. in area at the ground floor level except by conditional use permit. The width of the visible garage door area when closed shall not exceed 60% of the principal building facade (including garage) fronting on the primary street. e. Subdivision Identification Signs: the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo residential subdivision shall be allowed up to a maximum of 4 subdivison identification signs, including the identification sign for the golf course entrance, not to exceed 24 sq. feet in sign area each, located no closer than 10 feet to any public right-of-way. In addition neighborhood identification markers (pillars) shall be permitted to be no larger than 2 ft. x 2 ft. to identify the development logo and the name of the neighborhood. 8. Prior to the execution of a Final Plat for any phase of the development by City officials, the Developer shall enter into a Developer's Agreement for that phase acceptable to the City Attorney and approved by the City Council that delineates who is responsible for the design, construction, and payment of the required improvements with financial guarantees therefore. 9. Each phase of the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo shall be incorporated into the Common Interest Agreement concerning management of the common areas and establish a homeowner's association which shall be submitted in final form to the Planning Director PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 17 before any building permit may be issued for any structure in any phase of the development. Said agreement shall comply with Minnesota Statues 515B-103, and specifically the provisions concerning the transfer of control to the future property owners. The HOA documents shall include required maintenance of wetland buffers. 10. That the HOA documents include architectural requirements that require 4-sided architecture and garages facing the public right-of-ways to have windows and/or other architectural features. 11. The applicant shall enter into a landscape license and maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space for each platted phase of the development. 12. That the HOA be responsible for the maintenance of all landscape walls that cross residential property lines or publicly owned Outlots or rights -of -ways, and that the walls be contained within a landscape easement. 13. The developer shall provide for an 1-IOA owned and maintained children's play structure or other similar improvement on Outlot R as discussed by the developer during the PUD concept review. 14. That a fee in lieu of park land dedication be paid to the City based upon an appraisal by an appraiser to be chosen by the City and paid for by the developer. Also that a 30 ft. wide trail corridor be dedicated to the City centered on public trails in the development and that the value of the dedicated land be credited toward any fees in lieu of parkland dedication. The park land dedication shall not include wetlands, wetland buffer area, and no credit will be given for land beyond the 30 ft. centered on public trails. And lastly, that the cost of constructing any public trails within the dedicated park land be credited towards any fees in lieu of park dedication. a. Outlots B, and T shall be dedicated to the City as parkland for trails. 15. That the PUD Plans provide an 8 ft. public trail (concrete or bituminous) in the right-of-way in front of Lots 4-12, Block 16. 16. That a trail phasing plan be submitted by the developer to be approved by City Staff and that the public trails be constnicted within each phase prior to building permits being issued for that phase of development. 17. That a 10' wide trail segment be provided from Street D to the east edge of the plat within the County Right -of -Way. 18. That a sidewalk be provided on one side of every street in the development with the exception of Street C. 19. That the Tree Preservation Plans and Preliminary Landscape Plans be updated to comply with the City's tree preservation requirements and the City's landscape requirements for review and approval by the City prior to recording the final plat. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 1 8 20. The developer shall provide woodland management and pollinator friendly native seeding in lieu of some required tree preservation replacement tree requirements as recommended by the City's Landscape Architect. 21. All changes and modifications to the plans requested by the City Engineer in the Engineer's report dated, March 8, 2017 shall be incorporated into the preliminary plat and PUD plans. 22. The Preliminary Plat approval is conditioned upon the applicant meeting all City standards and design requirements unless specifically addressed otherwise in this resolution. 23. The developer shall comply with all comments identified within the Washington County letter dated March 6, 2017, including providing an additional 17 feet of right-of-way along 10th Street N. and constructing turn lane improvements meeting Washington County standards at the developer's sole expense. 24. The applicant shall provide evidence that all conditions attached the Valley Branch Watershed District pennit for the final plat and associated grading work have been met prior to the commencement of any grading activity. 25. That all openspace within the shorelands be protected with a conservation easement and that conservation easements be provided for review by the City Attorney and to be executed prior to final plat approval. 26. That golf carts shall be prohibited on city streets and city trails unless specifically allowed by City Ordinance. 27. Prior to the issuance of building permits all wetland buffers shall be delineated and identified via staking or signage that is acceptable to the City. 28. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the gas pipeline easement within the development area as a condition of preliminary plat approval. 29. Prior to the construction of any subdivision identification signs or neighborhood markers within the development, the developer shall submit sign plans for review and obtain a sign permit from the Planning Department. 30. That the preliminary plat be updated to include street names that are consistent with the City's street naming ordinance and approved by the City Council. 31. The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed pen -nits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 32. The developer shall enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and PUD plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 33. The developer shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. 34. That approval of the preliminary plat be contingent on Street D access to le Street. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 19 RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR REZONING: 1) That the rezoning is consistent with the comprehensive plan RECOMMENDED FINDINGS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY PUD: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and PUD plans: That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo PUD General Concept Plan was approved by the City on September 6, 2016 and the submitted Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plan is consistent with the approved PUD General Concept Plan. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan are consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan generally comply with the City's GCC - Golf Course Community zoning districts as modified by the PUD regulations. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with the City's subdivision ordinance. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with the City's Planned Unit Development Regulations. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with City's Engineering Standards, except where noted in the review memorandum from the City Engineer dated March 8, 2017 and modified by the PUD regulations. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan comply with other City zoning ordinances, such as landscaping, tree preservation, shoreland, and erosion and sediment control, except as noted in this staff report review memorandum from the City Engineer dated March 8, 2017. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary PUD plan achieve multiple identified objectives for planned developments within Lake Elmo. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 1) Rezoning of the former 3M Tartan Park properties from PF — Public Facilities to GCC — Golf Course Community with the following motion: PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d 20 "Move to reconnneiul approval of the rezoning of the Royal Golf Course Development propertiesfrom PF-Public Facilities to GCC-GW Course Community based on the findings identified in the Staff report." Staff recommends the Planning Corrunission recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary PUD Plans for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo with the following motion (this item cannot be approved by the Council until the Metropolitan Council approves the comprehensive plan amendment): "Move to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo with 33 conditions based on the findings identified in the Staff report." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Narrative 7. Preliminary Plat 3. Tree Preservation Plans 4. Preliminary Landscape Plan 5. Phasing Plan 6. Shoreland Evaluation 7. City Engineer's Report, dated March 8, 2017 8. Washington County's Report, dated March 6,2017 9. Street Names Exhibit 10. Concept Plan Staff Report PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4c & 4d A/x.i/`., ���l�| �K} �.^.._ City mfLake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of March 13, 2017 Chairman Kreinnercalled hrorder the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Kre/rner,Dodson, Dorschner,Emerson, Larson, Williams, Lundquist and Hartley COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Fields STAFF PRESENT: Planning DirectorVVensnnan and City Administrator Handt Approve Agenda: M/S/p:Dodson/VVUianns,move toapprove the agenda aspresented, Vote: 7-0,n/otion carried, unanimously. Approve Minutes: January 23,ZOl7 M/S/P: Dodson/Larson, move to approve the January 23, 2017 minutes as presented, Vote: 7-D^motion carried unanimously. Approve Minutes: February 27, 2017 M/S/P: Williams/Lundquist, move to approve the February 27, 2017 minutes as amended, Vote; 4-D,motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing —PW0Concept Plan — Lakewood Crossing 2nd Wensman started his presentation regarding the Lakewood Crossing 2 nd Addition PUD Concept Plan. This will bea3lot subdivision nnI82acres. The proposal isfor afull service restaurant, chiropractic and other retail activities. This property is currently vacant but isguided for commercial. This PUDConcept Plan isintended tobeintended toprovide the applicant guidance sothat they can adjust the proposal ifnecessary. The PUD will give flexibility to maximize the use of the property when straight zoning does not work. There iserequirement that 2UY6ofthe project area beopen space. There are noopen space calculations which must beprovided. Lot dimensions and Bulk requirements are largely met, but flexibility is being requested for the following 1) minimum lot width Z\ Impervious surface 3) Parking setbacks. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 2 There are some deviations from the commercial design standards. Some Vfthe standards do not apply to this site and the unique shape of the lot make some of them a challenge. There isnot much landscaping proposed, especially along the exterior streets. Most of the review comments come from engineering and have to do with traffic and access management. Hudson Blvd isamain collector and there isspacing limitations to66Ufeet spacing for full access intersections. That would put the West access in the Ebertz property. The City issuggesting working with the Ebertztodevelop together. There are 18 recommended conditions of approval including meeting all engineering comments, a comprehensive sign plan, open space calculations, amended landscape plan to meet city standards, financial security, obtain necessary permits, etc. Kreimer asked if this could be done with one entrance or if there would need to be two for safety. VVensrnan stated that to his knowledge there vvnu|d not need to he two, but should berun bythe fire chief and city engineer, Williams asked why there would be no deed restriction on the shared parking as part of this as it states it is at the time of sale, VVcnsnoan stated that there should be a cross access agreement with the plat, not attime ofsale. Hartley asked ifthe city engineer reviewed this for drainage. VVensnnanstated that at the concept plan, they are looking at the bigger picture and the issue is the access management. Kreimer asked why this property would need to provide the sewer and water. |sitnot inHudson Road? VVensrnanstated that the sewer access does not extend all the way down tnEbertzproperty. Bruce Miller, CM Properties, they are building an speculation and hope that the businesses will come. They are asking for some flexibility from the code sVthat they can bring amuch more quality development forward. The drive through component ioa CUP inthe Commercial code through the PUDprocess and they would like to get those approvals now so that they can market to those types of businesses with confidence. He feels that the allowed signage is limiting and signs would be difficult to see. They have been working on some signage proposals for a comprehensive sign plan. K4U|er stated that rather than the 2O96open space required with a PU[\ he is proposing upgraded architectural features. Heisconfident that there will beenough parking. It is to there benefit to make sure there is adequate parking to meet the needs of their tenants. Hartley asked about ashared driveway Vnthe West side with the EbeMz. Miller stated that the first phase would not need the second access point unless the fire chief Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 requires it. Hestated that hedoes not control the Ebertzproperty, but heiswilling to give them aneasement for access. Public Hearing opened at7:S2prn Noone spoke and there were nowritten comments Public Hearing closed at7:5Zprn Williams feels that this isagood development and good for this spot. Hedoes have concerns about the access spacing, traffic flow for all the drive thruand parking needs tobemore detailed, The offsets toopen space heiswilling todiscuss, but needs tobe convinced with more details oflandscaping and architectural design. Dodson agrees with Williams and would like to see an agreement worked out with the property owner tothe West. There was discussion regarding concern with the traffic flow of the drive thru. Kreimer would like to see a couple of islands in the center of parking lot to break it up a little bit. He is also concerned about the turn radius for the multiple d,ive'thru and isconcerned about the access spacing. Lundquist thinks this will be a great addition to the community and she is not concerned about the d'ive'thruradius. Hartley i5uncomfortable permitting some ofthese activities without knowing what the actual use orscale will be. Hewould like tosee them asConditional Use Permits asthe use comes in. Kreirnerwould like toadd condition #19 that the applicant shall be limited to 4 drive thru accesses and 2 of these must below intensity uses. Miller stated that the approval ordenial for adrive thru would impact how you lay out the site and construct the building. Dodson iswondering if the design of the buildings limits what types of businesses would go in there. Miller stated that the design would dictate what types of businesses would go in there. Williams iswondering ifwith the next phase the developer could give them information regarding the drive thru traffic. Hartley stated that the drive thnu traffic could be part of the parking space analysis. M/S/P: Dodson/Williams, move to add condition of approval #19 that an analysis be done on the drive thru traffic volume, including any impact on the parking areas as well as the secondary access and overall development, Vote: J-0,motion carried Doochnerfeels that this would beself-managing a»businesses will pick alocation that will accommodate their needs. Hedoesn't see the concern with the parking asthis development doesn't seem any more dense than inother communities. Lundquist agrees. She sees the traffic going around with aflow. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 4 M/S/P: Dorschner/Lundquist, move to recommend approval of the Lakewood Crossing 2 d addition PUD Concept Plan with the 19 conditions of approval as drafted by staff and amended bythe Planning Commission, based onthe findings offact listed inthe staff report, Vote: 7'0,motion carried unanimously. VVi||iannsm/ou|d|ikeafriend|yannendnoenttn#l4thatthevvord"fnr"beinse/teda1the beginning ofthe sentence. This friendly amendment was accepted. VVensrnan suggested that for condition #17, the first part of sentence should be struck and it should read ''adeed restriction that guarantees access tothe parking for all uses must be submitted." This friendly amendment was accepted. Public Hearing — Final Plat and PUD Plans — Inwood 51h Addition VVcnsnnan started his presentation regarding Inwood 5 thAddition final plat and PUD Plans. This isthe last addition nfthe residential portion ofthe development. This isa rep|attingofOut(ots/,8,Fand GofInwood ]mAddition. They are proposing 101Single family lots. In 2014,VVashington County conducted a Preliminary Plat review and requested an additional 3IftofROW from future 1011Street improvements. This condition was acondition Vfapproval documented inseveral locations. |t|sinthe 2O14 Preliminary Plat report, the resolution approving Preliminary Plat and the signed developer's agreement. Atone point the Developer was talking with the County about ROW tothe north. That never transpired and plans were never updated. The County has control over the proposed Island Trail and lO1» street intersection and they want the 3Zftofdedicated ROW with this plat. Anothercondidonofpna|irninaryp|etapprpva|isthatthedeve|operinstaUannuhi- purpusetnai|a|ong1Omstreothetmeen|s|andTrai|and|nvvoP6Ave. Staff was supportive of removal of this trail, but the Commission and Council's resolution of approval required this trail. Preliminary Plat was never updated and itisnot included in Inwood txPlat submittal. There are some Landscaping and engineering revisions that are required, such as removal of certain trees and berms and required water main easements. Kreimer asked if there is room to build the homes if they do the 32 foot ROW dedication. VVpnsrnan stated that those any deep lots, but the back yards will have part ofthe berms and itwill tighten things up. Williams iswondering why the application is not deemed incomplete without that RUVV dedication. VVensrnan stated that it was originally deemed incomplete. The Developer provided more information and upon the City Attornay'sadvice, it can bedealt with through conditions. There was discussion about the advantage nfthe trail ROW tmthe North vs. the South. The trail mxzu|d be located within the 326eet of ROW being requircd. VVensrnan stated that from a Planning perspective, the trail is desirable to move people to the future commercial properties to the West. Dodson asked if the segment of trail along 1Om street would he aCity trail. VVensnnanstated that hethinks itisHOAowned and maintained, but heis not sure. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 Williams stated that condition #4 should be South Washington instead of Valley Branch watershed district. Hartley is wondering if this was reviewed by the Fire Chief, specifically if the Circles that dead end are wide enough. VVensrnanstated that itwas aconcern ofthe City Engineer and he would like the pavement widened there so that they function better. John Rask, K4| Homes, stated that the cu/'de-sacsare standard radius for cu|-de-sacsso they would accommodate afire truck. Hedoes not necessary disagree with the conditions of approval of Preliminary Plat, but what is missing is that there were subsequent approvals granted for final plats and grading that didn't have this trail. They had discussions with the County and they agreed to take the ROW and trail to the North. Rask feels that with the staff turnover, some things have fallen through the cracks. Rask stated that these discussions were held after the Preliminary Plat was approved. Hefeels that the County has changed the requirements. When Inwood was approved, itwas known and stated that both Inwood and 1[yh Street would someday be 4lane roads with trails onone side. Roskstated that ifthey grant the ROW, they will need to take out the berm and the trail was never once shown onany nftheir plans. The berm was installed at expense to the developer to make the development look better. They graded the berm with agrading permit and noone ever mentioned that the trail wasn't nnthe plan. Roskfeels they are consistent with the Ok/strail plan and added trails otthe [it/srequest. Raskismaking the following request that 1>the Planning Commission find that the trail along loth street isinconsistent with the Citv^s Comprehensive Plan 2) Strike the conditions requiring additional ROW and a trail along 1OmStneet3\KeconfinnthatthetnsUandadditiona|RovvshVu|dbconthcnorthsideof lCp» Street 4) allow the existing berm to remain as approved in the Development contract approved bythe City Council, Dodson asked what would happen to the berm if the additional 32 feet of ROW is given. Raskstated that they would need totake out the berm. Williams asked why itcouldn't be/novedtothesouth. Raskstated that the whole row oflots would belost asit couldn't remain inthe ROW. Williams asked when the developer was made aware mf the staff'sanalysis ofthe ROW issue. Raskstated that bwas probably inDecember. What happened is they went to County for an access permit to construct the road and then they were told about the trail and additional ROW. Ra:kdoesn't believe that the County has that authority, Williams doesn't see that the City should bcinvolved inthis other than dealing with what is in written record which is the condition of approval. Wensman stated that the trail and the ROW were conditions of approval that are in multiple locations and were carried over from Preliminary Mat. It is typical for the County to require these things with access and typical for the City to require that as part ofthe plat. Public Hearing opened at9:OOpnn Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 6 No one spoke and there were no written comments Public Hearing closed at9:ODpnn Williams thinks that the trail and ROW issue is more complicated than they can deal with tonight, Hewould suggest that under condition #9that atthe end add "unless the County submits written permission for less ROVV". Hefeels that the written record shows that the ROW should bededicated, but /tisuptothe County. VVensnnanstated that the County has reaffirmed their letter from November 17, 2014, that they would still need that ROW. Handt stated that ifthe City does not get that ROW at the time of plat, when the County does need toacquire the land, they will come back and charge the City for the acquisition ofthe ROW. Raskdisagrees with that statement, M/S/P: Will iarns/DodsVn,move tVadd finding #Othat the legal issues surrounding the additional 32 feet of ROW and the trail from Island to Inwood along loth Street are beyond the scope of the Planning Commission, Vote: 6-1,motion carried, with Lundquist opposed. Lundmuistfeels that they hove an obligation to remain consistent with what the County is asking for. K4/S/P: Kreimer/Dodson, move to add finding #9 that the Planning Commission finds signihcantva|uetotheexistin8bernnthatthedeve|operbui|ta|ong10'»5treetandthe County should be requested to retain the berm regardless of the ROW issue' Vote: 6-1, motion carried, with Lundquist opposed. Wensman stated that the County is fine with the berm staying as long as there is a wall once itgets tothe ROW. They don't want tohave tomove orrestore the berm if improvements need tobemade. Lundquist stated that loth street isamajor thorough fare with plans toBotoa4lane and they need the space. K4/S/P: Dodson/VViIlia nns,move tnrecommend removing condition number ll requiringannu|ti-purposetrai|a|nng1OmStreeYbetvveen|s|andTiai|and|nxvoodAvebe removed, Vote: Jc0,motion carried unanimously. Kreinnerremembers the discussion about the trails and heremembers giving upthe requirement for a trail on Inwood, but that they decided that they wanted the trail along lQth Street. Larson stated that there is already a trail through the development to the commercial snitisnot like there isnntrail atall. Dorschnerremembers the developer stating that they could get easements onthe North side ofloth for the trail. He feels it makes sense to make the connection. Rask stated that to give more RDVV and build the trail, hewould have toremove the berm, Raskstated that when they sat down with the County, he felt that there was no cornprnrn/se. He feels that the County wants everything and iswilling togive nothing. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3'13'17 7 M/S/P: Kreirner/VViUianns,move toadd acondition requiring that the section 0ftrail from Island trail tothe eastern buffer isbuilt, Vote: 7-(lmotion carried unanimously. M/5/p: Dodson/Williams, move toadd a finding #1Othat the City consider any trail required to be implemented by the development from island Trail to Inwood be credited towards parkland dedication, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. M/S/P: Williams/Dorschner, move to recommend approval of Inwood 51h Addition Final Plat and Final PUD plans with 11 conditions of approval based on the findings as amended in the staff report, Vote: 7-8, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing — Zoning Map Amendment and Preliminary Plat and PUD Plans - Royal Golf Wensman started his presentation regarding the rezoning from PF to GCC — Golf Course Community and the Preliminary Plat and PUDPlans, VVensnnanwent through the issues from the Concept plan that were addressed with the Preliminary plan. With the PUD Overlay, the developer has requested flexibility. They would like single access tothe clubhouse, lot sizes smaller than 9000 for villa lots, 40% impervious and 20 ft front yard setbacks on villa lots, 50 ft ROW on Street C, add'I subdivision and neighborhood signs, and garages greater than l000sqfttobepermitted rather than aCUP. With the Shone|andevaluation, there are lU0lots within the shore|ond area, the development is preserving 50.5% or the shoreland, where 50% is required, less than allowed base density within each shoreland, shoreland impact zones and steep slopes preserved in Lake Elmo and Downs Lake, 70% of shoreland impact preserved for Rose and Horseshoe, S3.9Y6ofLake Elmo shone|andpreserved, and preserved a wildlife/drainage corridor from NVVtoSE. The developer needs tomaintain a1UUft Natural Corridor outside oflot areas. They have O9feet, sVstaff has made the 1OOfoot corridor acondition ofapproval. The G[Cminimum lot size is9000sqfeet. The PUD flexibility sought isG,6OUsq0Lonsome lots. The average lot size isl3,499sqfeet because ofsome ofthe larger lots. There isalso arequest for PUDflexibility for 20' front setback and 7.S'setbacks. The 7.5'setback averaging isalready allowed bypolicy. Staff is requesting there be an exhibit which clearly shows specific lots and setbacks, no encroachments into D & U easements and lots with 20' setbacks -should have garages adorned with windows or other architectural features for sides of garages facing the public ROW. The G[Cmaximum impervious per lot is30%,the request for PUD flexibility is for 40Y6. Staff feels this is ok as it matches LDR zoning and will be limited to the villa lots. The developer isasking toforego the sidewalk requirement onanumber of streets. Staff is only supportive ufstreet C having no sidewalk because of site limitations. Dodson would like the exhibit showing the setbacks to also show which lots can have the larger garage. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 GCC allows 1000 sq ft maximum garage and the developer is asking for a deviation for a larger garage tostore golf carts, Staff issupportive ofthe request, provided that the garage doors will not exceed 60% of the principal building fagacle fronting a public road, impervious surface limits are not exceeded, and that the upper limit ofpermitted Williams The subdivision code allows for two 24 square foot subdivision signs per development. Developer is requesting flexibility to have up to 4 subdivision signs (including one at clubhouse entrance) and up to 6 neighborhood markers to identify the villa enclaves within the development. Staff issupportive Vfthe flexibility due tothe unique layout and size nfthe development and the multiple entrances. Asign permit isrequired prior to construction. The developer isproposing unique street names that have agolf theme. Wensman stated that it does not meet the County street naming conventions, but does meet the City'sstreet naming ordinance, The allowed architecture would be addressed inthe HOAdocuments. For tree preservation and tree replacement, the developer is interpreting the site as mixed -use which would allow replacement trees to be used as landscape required bees. The City attorney and staff interpretation is that it isnot omixed use. The landscape plan cannot beevaluated until tree replacement is determined. Landscape walls crossing residential property lines shall beowned and maintained bythe HOAand within the maintenance easements. Williams asked ifthere was adefinition of"forest management and natural seeding° Hefeels that i1needs to beclearly defined. The developer's vision is to have all the development accessible by golf cart, The public RUVV and trails would need to allow golf carts. This would require a special City ordinance asitiscurrently prohibited. Anagreement has been reached with the Emerson property toprovide access tnloth Street. VVensnnantalked about phasing of the development. itisanticipated bobedone in4phases from 2Ol7'2OZ3. Phase one Lake Eli -no Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 9 isnbig phase asthe infrastructure must beput inand the golf club isrequired tobe xevveredwithin Zyears. There are some engineering issues that will need tobe addressed such as infiltration ponds located in gas line easement, lift stations on outlots that donot appear large enough 10accommodate them, out|otsneed tobededicated and others onthe engineers report. There are some transportation requirements including dedicating ROW and supplying turn lanes. The Golf Course isplanning toput inclubhouse cottages. The location iscurrently shown as a separate lot. Staff is recommending that the lot be combined with the clubhouse lot asthese cottages are accessory to the clubhouse and will require a CUP. Hartley asked ifthis property |sthen considered commercial. Larson feels that the zoning isconfusing when the golf course istaken out ofit. There are alot ofdifferent things going on with this development and he is wondering why it would not be mixed use. VVensnnanstated that the City Attorney does not feel itisemixed use. VVensnnanwent through the 34conditions of approval and findings offact. Staff is recommending rezoning from Public Facilities to GCC based on the findings identified in the staff report. Staff isalso recommending approval nfthe Preliminary Plat and PUD plans with the 34 conditions with the understanding that the City Council cannot approve this until the Met Council approves the comprehensive Plan amendment. Wensman stated that the jurisdictional review period ends on March 24t'. Once that ends, the Comprehensive Plan Amendment can be submitted to the Met Council. The Met Council has 6Odays toreview itand get back tothe City. Dodson isasking about impervious surface and drainage around the villas. VVensrnan stated that the engineering plans were not included but the water has been addressed through the engineering plans, Donschnerasked about reductions ofgolf fees and six figures for replacing ball fields. Heiswondering ifitisnot acondition, where would that becaptured for the City. Schroeder, HCGolf, stated that itwould beinthe developer's agreement. Kneinnerasked ifthe Park Commission weighed inabout the Tot lot location. |tseems in a location that would not serve many people. VVensnnan stated that the Park Commission did not really talk about it. The developer isactually talking about moving itwhere the more millennial product islocated. Dodson isconcerned about the drive into the clubhouse. ]fthere isabig tournament, people might try tn park along that driveway. |sthere away tomitigate that? VVensnnanstated that itcould bcsigned noparking. Rick Packer 8'Clark Schroeder, Royal Golf, are not infavor ofthe sidewalk/trail and prefer 6 ft. He does not like the look of sidewalks in a cul-de-sac and they do not help with connectivity because they would dead end. Sidewalks are not typically put inacu|' de -sac. There is discuss/on regarding the tree preservation. This i5clearly a cOnlnn2rCia| use and should betreated asamixed use. They are not opposed tothe forest management. The golf cart access isvery important tothem asagolf course community. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 lO Lundquist stated that at one time there was talk about putting an 8 foot shoulder on the south side ofl0mstreet tomake itsafer. She iswondering ifthey still plan todothat. Schroeder stated that they will be dedicating ROW, but what that is used for, they are not sure. Packer stated that they will be building right turn lanes at locations. There will bewidening atthe turn lanes. Packer stated that the speed limit is45mph onthe road. If there is a concern about safety, maybe the speed limit should be reduced to 30 mph. Williams stated that a trail in the NVVcorner from ZCth Street to Lake Elmo Ave would be very useful. Packer stated that they could look at that and it would take tree removal. Larson would like todiscuss the zoning for the golf course aspublic facility vs. golf course community, Packer stated that was the route the City Council chose toQo with. Hefeels that ithelps preserve the golf course and the open space. K[einnerasked about the tot lot location. Would itwork bvstreet "F". Packer stated that it might work there or in the Southern area, but they are trying to be sensitive to the Homestead neighborhood. Packer stated that maybe it could go up with the pool and fitness center onHOAmaintained property. Public Hearing opened atl1:lOprn Michael 8iebLl2OZOlOmStreet N,representing people onthe East side ofthe development, he feels some of the things that the City is asking for, such as increased sidewalks, decreases the buffers. The City has norequirements toprovide buffers to anyone outside ofthe City. The tightest units are the one that border West Lakeland and there are nobuffers. Even though there have been traffic studies, he is concerned that development traffic and wedding venue traffic will be too much for this road. Would like tosee a good give and take with the developer tomake this agood plan. Michael Zwiefe|,2US5Manning Trail, the common theme ofthis development is flexibility. He would like to point out that this property was purchased with the only use allowed agolf course. Heheard atthe very first presentation that awell-run golf course is sustainable on its own, so everything else being mentioned is not necessary, He feels with all of the uses on the site, close to 300 homes, restaurant, fitness center, wedding venue, etc,the traffic count will increase lU,ZOoreven 3O96. The events held atthis location will bevery hard onthe community surrounding it. There are alot ofVilla lots and itseems that there is an exception being asked for with almost all of them. Lot sizes are being asked to be smaller, setbacks reduced, larger garages and less impervious surface. All ofthese things seem tobncounterproductive for what the City should be looking for. Hefeels that tomeet City requirements, they should reduce the density and they could easily meet the standards. Jim VneU�m �11]141Z Street N,itishard tostay ontop ofthis development asit continues to change. Hedoes not like the trail that goes tothe northern nfthe existing neighborhoods. Hedoes not see the benefit ofitwith people running along their Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 11 backyards. The City has agreed tosewer and doall ofthese extra things. When )sthe City going tosay notosomething? Hefeels the answer tothe cottages should bono. He feels that this development is totally inconsistent with the neighborhood. It seems that the City is too willing to give the developer everything that they want. Hefeels that if the golf course would not have been a part of this, the development would have been done asonopen space development asl8units per 4Oacres. Even ifthe golf course property was included as an open space development, there would have been 200 houses v»3OOhouses. VoeUerfeels that the neighbors are not being listened toas there was a petition signed by 160 neighbors that were not in favor of the density here. Ellen Johnson, 21050 141h Street, board member for Homestead community. Her neighborhood feels that having the trail so close to their neighborhood infringes on their privacy. Their neighborhood /scurrently innegotiations with the developer to provide acustom shielding. They have anagreement inspirit, but would like itin writing soitisclear. They are wondering ifthe neighbors will have access toRoyal Golf ifthe shielding isn't adequate and they want tVadd tuit. Dana Smith, 2121 Legion Lane N, he likes the forest management and the fact that about GO96ofthe trees are being preserved. Helikes the idea ofreducing the speed limit on 2Om Street to 30 mph because the safety ufbikers and walkers is a big concern. All ufthe deviations stem from the number pfunits being put in. Hefeels that ifthe number ofunits are reduced, the deviations would befewer. Heisnot sure why the density discussion has been abandoned. Hefeels that the safety nfZO1» street isvery important and hefeels that the developer saying that they have done the best that they can isnot good enough. Heisconcerned about the light pollution from the lights. He is wondering ifthere are regulations surrounding lighting. Mary Leslie, II5462OmStreet, her husband negotiated the original purchaseagnaernent with the original property owner when 3Mpurchased the property. She isvery concerned with how steep the banks are on2O`nStreet and the fog that isonthe road from Lake Elmo Lake. She feels with the intensity ofthe things going in at Tartan Park, the speed limit should bereduced. She is concerned about the water and the ponding. Public Hearing closed atll:53prn 0nrchnerisstill not clear why the golf course needs tuberezoned. VVensnnanstated that itiscurrently public facilities. |fhstays that way, there would benVdevelopment and the comprehensive plan approved by the City Council guides it for a golf course community zoning. Dorachnerstated that when they approved the golf course community zoning he did not understand that to be adding all of the commercial type uses such as the clubhouse, rental units, restaurant and the fitness center. Williams stated that as much as he is opposed to this development, the City Council has decided onthe direction and this proposal meets the GC[zoning. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 12 K8/S/P: Lundquist/Larson, move to recommend approval of the rezoning of the Royal Golf Course Development properties from PF-Public Facilities to G[['Go|fCourse Community based onthe findings identified inthe staff report, and changing the finding on page 19 to say "that the rezoning is consistent with the Comprehensive plan approved bythe Citv", Vote: 7-C\motion carried unanimously. K4/S/P: Williams/Dodson, move to add condition #35 that a sidewalk be constructed along the south side ofI[y^ Street from what is labeled street E, West to Lake Elmo Ave, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. Lundquist was going tomake aproposal orfinding offact that wxedoalittle more work onZ[P»Street asitdoesn't have any shoulders oneither side, |nall the public hearings, people talk about the safety on ICYo Street with current traffic, let alone adding more to it. Dodson feels that the sidewalk isneeded toget tothe Park Preserve. KA/S/P: Lundquist/Lacson,move 10add finding offact #8that there has been a significant amount of testimony that 20th Street is already dangerous because it has no shoulders and poor line of site without any additional traffic and the City and developer need to explore ways to make the road safer, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. M/5/P: Dodson/Williams, move that the Royal Golf Development will not have any street lighting, except atstreet intersections and that there beaphotometric analysis to ensure that any current lights in the parking lot meet the dark sky ordinance, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. Williams asked about the photometric analysis of the parking lot near the clubhouse. VVensrnanstated that they are not making any changes. The position ofthe City isthat any intensification would require aCUP amendment. VVen5rnanstated the current City code does not require lighting, but there are standards for when they are placed. This might be o topic that the Planning Commission looks at in the future. Packer stated that they donot have astrong feeling one way orthe other inregards to street lights. They would like tosee the street lights atintersections for safety however. M/S/P: Dorsch ner/Lu nd quist, move to add condition #36 that the developer work with all adjacent properties to get an agreement for shielding in place for screening and that it be incorporated into the final landscape plan, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. Williams stated that there was testimony from a West Lakeland resident that there was not adequate screening and itisnot shown onthe plan for the Eastern border. Packer stated that there is an email agreement with the resident for a septic and landscaping agreement. Schroeder stated that the person that spoke regarding not having adequate screening, actually lives across Manning Trail and is not actually an adjacent property owner. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 13 Dodson wanted tndiscuss the forest management proposal. VVensnnanstated that one of the builders for the development is proposing different lot lines for the eastern portion ofthe development. VVensnnanstated that staff would like toreview this and bring itback tnthe Planning Commission inthe future. The developer isrequesting that this be tabled to the next meeting to give staff time to review the changes with revised plans. The forest management discussion can also be brought forward at that meeting. There was some discussion regarding the irregular shaped lots. Williams wanted to comment on the number of units for the development and the fact that the time has passed tVtry tolower the number. Dodson iswondering iythe trail inoudot"T"can bere-routed toDoalong the new homes ofthe development. Packer stated that there are wetland buffers that donot allow trails and there isaretention basin. There isnoway toget atrail closer tothose homes. KA/S/P: Williams/Larson, move to postpone consideration of the preliminary plat and PUDplans until the next meeting, Vote. 7-0,motion carried unanimously. VVensnnanasked about the forest management plan, Williams stated that buckthorn isa big concern of his. Hartley stated that it should be continuing effort and not one shot deal and there should be some assurance that the woodlands is preserved. Williams reminded everyone to bring all of the data for Royal Golf to the next meeting for Royal Golf so that the City doesn't have to reproduce it. City Council Updates — March 7, 2017&8eetng i) Hammes Estates 3"oAddition Final Plat Extension —Passed ii\ ApproveSH[CVnnpP|anUpdateAureernent—Passed iii\ Shnre|andManagement Overlay District Ordinance Amendment —Passed iv) Planning Commission Appointment —Terry Emerson Z»d Alternate Staff Updates l. Upcoming Meetings a. March Z7,ZO17 i Comp Plan Amendment hearing for Tr)-LahesK4USA ii VK4Xrezoning hearing i|i Possibly Hidden Meadows Final Plat b. April IC\2O17 2. MAC CEP Report Commission Concerns Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 14 Dodson is concerned that the commercial code was not adequate for the commercial development that was brought forward tonight. Heisconcerned with the number of PUD'sthat keep coming forward. VVensrnanstated that once the PUDordinance isin place it will be easier and is a tool that is used to make development better. Dodson mentioned that another thing that was not talked about with Royal Golf was the use of golf carts. Hmisinfavor ofthe use ofgolf carts inthis development. VVensnnan stated that itwould beanordinance amendment. Lundquist iswondering ifthe City Engineer works with ahydrologist. VVensnnanstated that they work with Valley Branch which isprobably ahydrologist. Goose Lake isfilling upand probably can't take much more. Meeting adjourned atlZ:47pnn Respectfully submitted, ]oanZi2rtrnan Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-13-17 City ofLake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes mfMarch 27,2017 Chairman Williams called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at COyNK8|SS|[)PdE&S PRESENT: Larson, Doochner,Emerson, Williams, Lundquist and Hartley COMMISSIONERS ABSENT. Fie|ds, Kneinmerand Dodson STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director VVensrnanand City Administrator Handt Approve Agenda: The agenda was accepted as presented. Approve Minutes: March 13, 2017 M/S/P: Lundquist/Dorschner, move to approve the March 13, 2017 minutes as amended, Vote: 6-0, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing — Zoning Map Amendment — General Business to Village Mixed Use Wensman started his presentation regarding the rezoning of properties from GB to VK4X. Since 2O13,there have only been 3properties rezoned toVMXbased on applications received by the City. In 2016,the Planning Commission discussed rezoning all of the properties to VMX, but tabled itfor the following reasons l\ densities within this area are guided too high 2)VK8Xstandards are less restrictive 3\ form based code should be created 4) updated population and development projections for area needed. The rational for the rezoning is to bring the subject perperties' land use consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. Without the rezoning atthis timnn,many improvements to these properties would require owners to rezone toVK4X and obtain variances. Wensman went through the differences between GB and VMX such as lot width, lot area and impervious surface maximum. There are D3parcels currently zoned general business. There are some parcels that are guided R5 that are guided forVK4X and there are a number of parcels zoned RS being used for business, not single family homes. The residential properties being used for business were not noticed, but should be included inthis rezoning, Re -publication nfthe public hearing toinclude these properties would be needed. The properties that are guided for VMX,but currently used assingle family Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 Z residences, staff is not recommending rezoning atthis time. Staff feels that single family residences should beanallowed use inthe VK4X. |fthat iuthe case, those existing single family homes could be rezoned to VMX as it would have no impact on them. New and existing homes should betreated the same. Hartley is wondering why there is long list of condition uses as part of the VMX district. Wensman stated it is the choice of the City Council to decide what is permitted and conditional. Some uses are conditional to allow greater scrutiny of those uses. In the Village, the lots and structures are very close to each other, so there could be uses that should have greater scrutiny with conditions put in place to mitigate unforeseen situations. Hartley thinks the veterinary services should bemore specific tosmall animals, not large animal services. VVensnoanstated that ifthere are specific changes tnthe code, that code bediscussed through the public hearing for the zoning. Williams iswondering ifthe City Council responded tothe June Planning Commission request for updated population projections for the Village area. VVensnnanstated that they did not specifically respond. They have now launched into the Comprehensive Plan process and it will be addressed through the process. Williams is asking if there were Z houses fairly far apart on existing lots, could they then subdivide and build another house. VV9nsrnan thinks there are greater requirements for single family homes, but hewill look atit. Williams asked about the status ofthe form based code. VVensnnanstated that with the Comprehensive Plan update, the priority for form based code was lowered. Emerson asked how many single family homes would beaffected ifthey change them toVMX. VVensnoanthought maybe around 3Oproperties. Williams asked what the downside would beofthose properties being legal non-confornning. VVensnnanstated ifthe home burned down, they could only rebuild onthe footprint and would not beable toexpand without avariance. Williams is wondering about making single family homes conditional uses. VVeosrnen stated that might beagood solution. Public Hearing opened at7:]Ipnn Sue Dunn, 1lO18Upper 33 rd Street, she would like the Commission toreally think about what things should beconditional uses. She isconcerned about surface water and impervious surface. She thinks the VK4Xcould possibly add anadditional lO,OOOpeople inthe Village Area. She isconcerned about the existing businesses. She thinks single family homes are important tothe Village Area. She thinks itisimportant toknow what the projections areforZU4Oandhowdosevvearetonneetingthoseprojections. There is also a huge section to the East that is considered part of the Village area. There were no written comments M/S/P: Dorsch ner/Wil lia ms, move to continue the public hearing for the Zoning Map Amendment Discussion to rezone properties to VN4X—Village Mixed Use to the next Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 possible meeting in order to properly notice the public hearing to include the additional properties inthe Zoning Map Amendment, Vote: 6-0,motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing — Comprehensive Plan Amendment to add 2 properties to RSF Sewered Wensman started his presentation regarding adding 2 properties to the Olson Lake Trail sewer area and re -guiding them to Rural Single Family sevvered. This would add 4497 &k 447]Olson Lake Trail tothe MU5A. The feedback from the Met Council isthat itwould just be an administrative review and would be similar to what was done in the Village to add additional properties. This does not require any jurisdictional review asvvehave a joint powers agreement with Oakdale. VVehave not received any comments from the public notice sent out and advertised. Dorschner asked what the Oakdale capacity would be for hooking up the rest of the properties around Olson Lake onthat road. VVcnsnoanstated that they are not in the MUSAsothere has been nntalk about Oakdale picking them up. VVensnnanstated that they do not know, because there is no plan for it and the property owners are not requesting it. Handt stated that the Engineers did reach out toneighboring properties to see if they wanted to be included, and these were the only 2 properties interested in being included. Williams iswondering ifthere isaZoning Text that isactually rural single family sevvened. VVensnnanstated that the City does not have that specific zoning, but his probably something that could be created. VVensrnan stated that there really is no problem leaving them asRural Single Family zoning, but the change tothe land use designation was something the City Council was interested in to distinguish those properties within the K4USA. Met Council was only concerned with land use designation inthe Comprehensive Plan allowing for sewer connection. Emerson is wondering if they would move the MUSA line without the property owners asking for it. VVensnnan stated that the City has not required properties to be sexvered unless the property owner has petitioned for itand signed awaiver. Public Hearing opened at7:44pnn Noone spoke and there were nowritten comments Public Hearing closed at7:4Sprn M/S/P: Dorschner/Lundquist, move to recommend approval of the amendment to the Otv'sWastewater Facilities Plan byadding P|D#'sO9029213ZUO1&OOUZ92l4OO59to the Olson Lake Trail K4USA' Vote: 6-0, motion carried unanimously. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 4 Hartley stated that they are adding these properties because they specifically requested it. Looking at the map, there are potentially 4-5 properties that would seem tofit the same characteristics of the other properties and why they requested it. Why isthe City not adding those properties? Williams stated K is because they did not request hand according toHandt,they actively declined bynot responding. VVensrnanstated that there was one additional parcel that was thinking about it, but after further discussion with the Engineer, they declined. Dorschneriswondering ifwvehave the means through the K4U5Atorequire connection. VVcnsnnanstated that with the joint powers with Oakdale, vvehave the means toconnect these properties. Dorschnerisconcerned that properties along the lake are still on old septic systems and what that means for the future. Hartley stated that he is concerned because the City does not have a very good mechanism to catch when drainfield fail and so we end up with even one house affecting the Lake. Handt stated that most septic problems are caught when the properties are sold or building permit is issued. Williams stated that the same logic for the additional properties could beapplied tothe whole Tri-Lakesarea. If the MUSAvvas opened up to the whole Tri-Lakes area, there would be numerous people speaking against it. VVensnnanstated that there are anumber of2O1septic systems \nthis area that have been created to deal with some of the failing septic systems. M/S/P: Lundquist/Dorschner, move to recommend approval of a Comprehensive Plan Amendment re -guiding P0#'sO9O29Zl32OO18O8O29Z14O859toRural Single Family Sevvered on the City's Land Use Plan, Vote: 8-0, motion carried unanimously. Dorschner wanted to confirm that there was no Rural Single Family Sewered zoning. Handt stated that there was not, but this is just guiding it as such in the Comprehensive Plan. Hartley wanted toreinforce his concern from the standpoint ofthe Comprehensive Plan, they do not have the potential pollution issues under control for all of these properties that have individual septic systems and the inspection of them comes well after the fact that they have failed. Williams doesn't disagree, but doesn't feel that it will change anytime soon as he has heard the same discussion for 40 years, Business Item —Preliminary Plat and PUD Plans - Royal Golf Wensman started his presentation by stating that the Planning Commission approved the rezoning toG[Con3/l3/l7and tabled the approval for the Preliminary Plan and Preliminary PUDPlans. Atthe last meeting, the developer was proposing some changes tothe NVVneighborhood, They have withdrawn those changes atthis time, The Planning Commission requested addition information on forest management, but the developer isnolonger interested indoing that. The developer has indicated hewill comply with the tree replacement requirements, but there is still dispute as to whether the project isannixeduse. Since 3/l3,the VB\NOhas raised concerns regarding some of the infiltration basins. The developer isworking through those issues and isconfident there are adequate solutions that will not impact the plat. Staff has slightly modified Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 5 the condition pertaining toVB\NDapproval. Staff added amissing condition that the green corridor in the NW neighborhood be a minimum of 100' wide outside of the lot area. Right now there isone area that isshown at8zywith one ufthe lot lines. Staff is recommending the same conditions with some corrections and additions. A correction to#l5,correcting the Lots and Block itpertained to. Condition #ZOpertains tnthe woodland management. |tdoesn't hurt tokeep that condition ifthe developer changes his mind, but itisuptothe Planning Commission how tohandle that. Condition #Z4was reworded tomake itclearer, #3Swas added tocapture the 1UU'green corridor. #36,#]7&are the 3conditions added bythe Planning Commission regarding the sidewalk along the South side of 201h street and that there would beno street lights except at street intersections to meet the dark sky ordinance and to work with adjacent property owners to come up with screening that gets incorporated into the landscape plans. The recommended findings are the same with the addition of#9 that a significant amount of public testimony regarding that 2 Oth street is already dangerous without the additional traffic and the developer needs to explore ways to make the road safer. Staff isrecommending approval with 38conditions ofapproval and the 9findings identified. Dnr5chnerasked what the dispute baround mixed use. VVensnnanstated that the tree preservation plan has a provision that requires mitigation as well as landscape requirements for residential development. For commercial and mixed use developments there is an exception that all trees with the exception of ornamental trees may becounted towards tree replacement requirements, The developer issaying that this site ismixed use with the golf course being the commercial piece. They are arguing that it the case so that all of the replacement trees will count towards their landscaping requirements. Staff issaying that the golf course isthe principle use; open space. It was a public facility in the past and it had an accessory commercial use, which isnot the primary use. They will becreating pseparate parcel for the more commercial site, and possibly that could heexempted, but exempting the whole golf course isnot consistent with past practice and the City attorney does not support the mixed use interpretation. VV2nsmnan stated the difference would be large cost tothe developer in tree replacement or a significant loss of trees for the City. Staffs solution for this was the idea offorest management tobetter serve the development. The developer likes the tree preservation better because it is more quantifiable vs the forest management which iskind ofagray area. Hick Packer, Royal Golf, stated that the attorneys were discussing the mixed use concept and they had hoped that they could come toacompromise. They did not feel that the forest management was a compromise, but an exchange for the tree preservation requirement. The Royal Golf attorney opinion isthat this development ismixed use. There is economic incentive that the City has provided to commercial development. There iscurrently nodefinition ofmixed use inthe City code. |nthe absence ofa definition, those terms are supposed to be given their plan and ordinary meaning, The Lal(e Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 6 Royal Golf Community has 4different types ofuses onthe property. There is residential, business services, food service and outdoor recreation. They feel that the golf course is clearly commercial use. This is a wooded site vs a cornfield, so the number isreally large, There are 850Qtrees onthis site, with about 300Otrees being removed. They are allowed to remove roughly Z5ODtrees or3O%. They are removing about 3596or4l8trees more than what isallowed, Based onthe City code without the mixed use exemption, they would need to plant 3OI4trees or 10trees per lot. Packer states it would cost them $1.5 million dollars for trees alone. They had proposed 900 trees or3trees per lot. Packer stated that staff rejectedthat asthere was nuway for them toinspect them. They are planting Il4trees that are ornamental which donot count either. They feel that they legally qualify for a mixed use and should get the exemption. They were looking for some compromise that they did not get. Royal Golf is proposing to construct a wide shoulder between Street E and Lake Elmo Ave vsatrail on2[y*Street that has noshoulders. There isasignificant grade change where the trail would need to goand aloss nftrees. They would argue that i1would be better served with adding a shoulder to the road that is wide enough to walk and bike on. Packer talked about the alternate Villa design and would like that to move forward tnthe City Council, There \sone driveway that isinthe sanitary sewer easement which isaconcern tothe city engineer. They can enter something into documents recorded against the property. Packer stated that this plan has one less unit than proposed with plat, but isessentially the same grading plan. Lundquist asked why the proposed sidewalk nnZ0monly goes just past the clubhouse. Packer stated that there are places that are very steep and would be very disruptive to that area. Williams asked why the City would not accept the sidewalk within the ROW. VVensnnanstated that K4SAstandards would require the sidewalk to be located on the outer edge ofthe ROW. Larson asked what the status ofthe tree replacement is. VVensnoanstated that there i3 the landscape requirement and the street tree requirement, The City isgoing the more lenient interpretation, requiring landscaping based onthe disturbed area calculation. Street trees will Aoinwith the road when the improvement goes in, |nterms ofthe development trees with 4trees going inwith the home, aslong as the City has escrow toensure the trees goin, the timing isn't asimportant. There isadifference between the developer and the City ofapproximately l00Otrees. That difference hinges onthe Mixed Use issue as the City and developer have failed to come to a compromise. Williams asked if they are opposed to any forest management in exchange for relief of the tree replacement. Packer stated that there isnucompromise ifitisdollar for dollar exchange they would not be interested. Williams stated that he is willing to relax the tree replacement provisions from 1000tm 500in return for a program of buckthorn removal for 3years after construction has started. Hartley thinks that itisproblematic asi1isnot just the individual home owners. Do,schnerstated that buckthorn isvery difficult tomanage and isgood screening. Hartley feels that the City isbetter off having Lal<e Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 7 new trees vs a management plan based on the possible tree diseases. Emerson feels that the uses out there are mixed use and that is what they need to decide. Williams feels that they need to go with the City Attorney's opinion on that issue, but also feels that there should be some relaxation of the number of trees with buckthorn removal. M/S/P: Williams/Lundquist, move to add an additional condition that the tree replacement requirement based on residential use be relaxed by 50% in return for the developer controlling buckthorn by cutting stems and treating the remaining stumps by either physical pulling or by herbicide application for a period of three years beyond the date for which construction begins for the adjacent phase, Vote: 4-2, motion carried with Hartley and Dorschner voting no. Wensman stated that this motion would replace condition #20 in the packet. Dorschner asked how many trees this would leave them to replace. Half would be around 500. Dorschner feels there would be more value in trees vs. the forest management. He feels the real issue is the mixed use interpretation vs. residential, but feels they need to go with the attorney's opinion. Jim Felton talked about what they did for the wildlife corridor and what was required by the VBWD. His estimate of cost for what they have done is about 50K. Dorschner inquired about developer talking to property owners on the East side regarding screening. Williams doesn't believe there are any West Lakeland properties that they need to be concerned about in regards to screening. Packer stated that they have an agreement with the Homestead development. Williams feels that the City should allow the golf carts on the streets for the GCC. Wensman stated that a separate ordinance would be required that is not part of the zoning code. They could recommend that staff bring one forward. Hartley stated that personally he is not in favor of the golf carts because they are often driven irresponsibly and rules are not followed. Emerson doesn't have a problem with golf carts and maybe an age limit could be put on it. Dorschner was in Arizona and many of the communities there have them. Larson stated that the golf carts would have destinations such as the clubhouse, restaurant, etc. Schroeder stated that they have looked at many ordinances in different cities and they address such things as age, speed, hours of operation, lights, etc. M/S/P: Williams/Dorschner, move to propose an additional finding #10 that the Planning Commission determines that it would be desirable to allow golf carts on the public streets within a golf course community, Vote: 5-1, motion carried, with Hartley voting no. Williams asked if the Fire Chief commented on the street names. Wensman stated that the Fire Chief does not like the new street naming policy, and is going to be taking the Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 8 whole street naming policy back tothe public safety committee. This street naming complies with the current ordinance. In regards to the street lights, the City Engineer stated that there is no requirement to have street lights inadevelopment. Packer iswondering ifthey have addressed the Villa area. Hondtstated that osof Friday, the developer was pulling that section, but tonight included itinthe presentation. VVensnnanstated that one clear problem based ontheir limited review is the driveway with astorm pipe underneath itwhich will need tochange. IVI/S/P: Williams/Dorschner, move to recommend condition #39 that staff reviews and approves the new plans presented tonight regarding the Villas and that the developer complies with all of the staff recommendations, Vote: 6-0, motion carried unanimously. K4/S/P: Lundquist/Larson, move to recommend approval of the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo with the 39 conditions based on the 10 findings identified in the staff report and amended by the Planning Commission, Vote: 6-0, motion carried unanimously. Business Item — Zoning Text Amendment — Village Low Density Residential Zoning Wensman started his presentation regarding the Village Low Density Residential Zoning. Since the last meeting, there were density ranges added, the impervious calculation was added to 35%, struck the maximum setback standard, allows free standing multi -family dwellings as a CUP to match the comprehensive plan, and clarified the setbacks for other residential uses. There was adesire atthe last meeting tohave abuild tVline incorporated into the VIVIX and the staff thinks that they have addressed that by the prevailing setback Vfthe street tohave consistency. |fitisanew street, hcan be decided atthat time, VVensrnanwent through some ofthe other standards. Williams asked about the garage standards and why that need tobecalled out specifically. VVensnnanthinks that itfor existing homes that might want tobuild an additional garage. There was some information regarding tiny houses and ifthe City wants toalter its minimum home size. VVensnnanthinks more research needs tnbe done regarding this for the next meeting. Another consideration iswould vvewant to have different standards for the urban vsrural areas. There was discussion ifthe Planning Commission thinks the VIVIDR zoning should just use the standards for LDR and have that reference made inthe Comprehensive Plan. Hartley is wondering how the City determines in the VIVIX what is a permitted use and what requires acondition use permit. VVensrnanstated that there isnot astraight Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 9 criteria that determines if it ispermitted vs a[UP. Typically the City makes uses conditional if it is perceived that the type of use could potentially create issues so the city wants tn put conditions on the use. Williams stated that if there were recommendations of uses that should be permitted, the Commission could take up that discussion |nthe future. Business Item — Zoning Text Amendment — Solar Ordinance VVensnnan started his presentation regarding the solar ordinance. Some of the reasons for a solar ordinance are to protect neighbors from glare, that it meets imperious surface, area and size requirements and that there is a decommissioning plan. There is also asolar farm definition, which isnot currently outlined inthe Zoning Code @s allowed permitted orcondition primary use. VVhcreshou/dthey beallowed aso primary use ifanywhere? Some nfthe standards are that itmust comply with accessory structure setback, height, lot coverage, etc. Should solar energy systems heexempt from certain standards incertain areas? Hartley iswondering ifthe City wants toadd to the ordinance that on HOAcan't prohibit the use ofsolar panels, W/ensrnan stated that would be unusual, but the City could put that restriction on. Currently solar farms are not allowed asthe primary use anywhere, should they be? Staff islooking for any other additional standards that the Commission would like toinclude. Hartley thinks a large commercial installation is very different than a residential one. He also feels that in residential, if it is limited to the rooftop, that is different issue than |fit takes upawhole back yard. Williams suggested aslightly different definition ofsolar farm from "wholesale sa|es"to "offsite customers". Williams wants "Off -grid systems" defined in the interconnection agreement section. Williams would like to eliminate "usinQaref|ectnrtnenhanceso|arproduc1ion"fronn1heref|ectonsection. Hartley stated that the commercial operations are probably the only ones to use reflectors. Williams balso confused about "screening tothe North side ofthe so|aranay" He thinks they need to look atthat. Hartley suggested just striking the word north. Williams thinks that it needs to be stated that solar panels are considered impervious for calculations. Emerson doesn't feel that the whole thing should be considered impervious. Williams feels that especially incommercial operations, you have compaction ofthe soils and itisnolonger like avacant field. There are also access roads and maintenance toconsider. VVensnnanstated that iti»creating aconcentrated flow and runoff. Williams feels that it is easier for the City to manage and not inconsistent with the codes Vfother Cities |f|tisconsidered impervious. Hartley stated that maybe the total area could becalculated and 5OY6isconsidered impervious. Williams would like toadd aprovision that HOA(sand [/C^sare not allowed toprohibit solar systems. Heiswondering ifthey should add solar systems as anincentive inthe PUD bonus table. Williams asked i[these systems would require city building permit. VVensnoanstated that they would because ofthe footings. Hartley stated that screening Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 IO and such would need tobereviewed bvthe City. VVensrnanstated that itmight not bea building permit, but a zoning compliance reviexv. Williams stated that there is a reference to building code in the code requirements section and it should say all rooftop or building integrated systems. Williams would like to add the words "and/or screened" toitem #7Visibility tobeconsistent with other rooftop structures, For storm water rnanagennent,VVi||iannsvvou|d|iketoadd"VVatershedDistrictsrequirennents" City Council Updates — March 21,3O17Meeting i\ Wildflower Z»*Developer Agreement passed ii\ Lakewood Crossing 2"«Addition Concept Plan PUD'passed iii\ Noise Ordinance —on hold Staff Updates 1. Upcoming Meetings a. April 1U,ZO17 b. Aph|24,IOl7 2. MAC CEP Report Commission Concerns Hartley would like to reinforce the idea that the meetings not be too long and that the Commission get out atareasonable hour. |fthe meeting gets too long, they are not at their best. Dorschnerwants to finalize the rural single fanni|vsovvered. \Nensnnan stated that the ordinance states that the rural single family should be predominately individual septic, but does not require ittobeso, If they are designated inthe comprehensive plan bythe K4USA,itisallowed, DorsChnerfeels there should bndifferent standard for when you are sevveredand when you anen't. VVensnnanwill look atitmore detail and report back. Williams is concerned that there has been nothing done as a City regarding form based code. He recognizes that it takes a long time, but it just keeps being pushed down the road. Wensman stated that through the Comp Plan amendment process, the vision will be reaffirmed. Meeting adjourned atlO:45prn Respectfully submitted, Joan 2iertrnan Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 3-27-17 qn 7-McCain Course Development, t.LC. 774 Ra63suan Rd NE, Binge, +:N 55444 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE EL I akc Elmo, SHEET INDEX: 1. Cover 2-7. Existing Conditions 8, Preliminary Plat Index 9.27 Preliminary Plat 26. Site Index 29-45. Preliminary Site anJ Utility Plan 46 Grading Index 47-59. Preliminary Grading and Erosion Control Plan 66-62. Detalis 63-65, Relandng Wall Profiles LI•L9. Landscape Plans TI-T25. Tree Preservation Plan P 1 •P3. Phasing Plan FRI -Nt'11111 RFi. COVER r • L 4,43, 1 Rast41'4DE / t it =41 4,444 41,44540- i • •• \kki Fia4°3'.":4`11‘-tz., A 544.4 St .41....444 Nott - t tttit? a- 1 • k•?::`• _ • A.A. a 4444,4444 — lIttliAr_5110514414 --°,,r,•=”- ....r1.4 4. AAA, AA 41.0 f444 PAO 2444 • I.44.444 oi 14A. 1,4441,ta 14 41*4.41 LEGAL DESCRIPTION 04,44,454,441 M0*t*/'40'44.4*4fll**44*4$*8*4.0**4*144448*1141 M Ari al 544.4 4A. 4444044 214 at *es, •44,.., 14ve1e,r444 1.444 4. 4e441 414 1*4.0. 44*44444, A4,44114 A4444 A, .4 4.4444141A44444. gs4roso •Aan• OA, S... 14,44-141 AM 444 1/A, Asst. 144. 44.444 14 Ow, 4.4 At *41*4*4148*444*44 ‘444.. EAS a? Sac. 23, .444 19 Nor, AA. 44044484444,14, .r.a.021 .44444. 844'144 AAA., V4 4, At /44 A.An £44414,44 1444,44. 4,4,,,t 0444 54,44:44:44 44:444kt Laf;t4 r xxo A. .1044 •40 SuatAl. 144,4. (V44 At 444.., ,44 L'IVAL'r...;,."' •1.!•••.1"•:-.7.1? ° "^" s'—`" .4 .1 at ,A4MA 4414 24 14444404, AvA,14. t, 44431. a, 6414. =II_ 444444t.¢414440454 otk. 4,444448t ott 9.• .4448*4 444, 44.4 tel 0.4.4 .11 MA 047.44 4F... Nt.04' a* IN WIN *E 44,4 A44..144 tzt 4, a 4111.n. 4412 61 NO prAA 4.4•444. 44 Ant 404 MCA asat .44 1.4.0,444144 14. akr4A-44 V,* Nu. e 444444. *4 ,,, 490 0,4 .4 44A. *4 At 75 ttrge.,4 4,Tiat:44,4 444444., sw,A, of MOO 4444 t.alf 54.40, 04.40 4444 »}."1V-AvA,T4rien5=1:=4V:,,S4,4=41,2 V*1741,7.An'tat tar VICINITY MAP stiAtt44-414 9 4 41 Et 0440*?-41444=40141 11 RR/Wm U.. 0,40,414 D't4tr'..44 Tr.; itgr- Olf Course Development, 11074 rtadssEttirt 04 t4E 844008 MIE 55449 NOTES v s• ftre 4,44 4.41414.0 14444444.4 . 44414 2) 444 4..4 ON 444411. p.r. 444 3. (4.4444A4A .4.4 4.444 14444444 - .48 4. 41.4, 'tar... D. tat 4444 44*.444 FM .44. • 244* Orargry 0•44,4 44.4,A4 WA 4.878.0 .4V4 OTAA M1,400 144 ,444. rot meeng gam, w 404,44 4,44*44 41) If S• , 64.4,140 NA 14414A IN se,A4, 44 144 .4. 44 .4, .4. SLUE DATA TIRTAL VTR AREA 44.24.06 AC, COMO now 9/4E 1115.11104 wittit.m.tr OVERLAY DISTRICT 511011E2300 LEGEND • - 0A.14 V.,. • - Fee. .1,An. - nv. 4., 40444.• 29. •44g. It. 4444 4 oto.nat ROW, R. THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Loki: Elmo, Minne5ota EXISTING CONDITIONS INDEX 2 / 41 / 65 :A L.::: :23* ,•8 s A Alf g-g 544 Itr4I, I if 7 • LEGEND , • • - 1....11.4* sr rx-x Ma ityt. - Syl Wt. F. Hr.* $ - * - - 2 - 1... 2.2. 2122 8 - Prer. Ikar 6 - - Or r 2 2 2-2 .12 2 2, 2-2.. -11. 2-2 — — • *222 22.2, 2,22 .262, - 2.2 Vyy. 22.2. 104.06. — _ — _ — — • Nor. 2.122 not. 2.22. = 2 *222 ..72222,2 2,2,2 • - E.. 2 • EAU, irran a* b.. AVA h 122.2 24. 22 21. A 021221. Ea* 4 SEC TION I 1' 2212.2 r.222222 122 - YWYV -I ,...---.-". ).•1 ' IC ' ' ' / 4 F- st - Fi -t _ Vs' NSHIP 2 ..-N- 'j_; -1":-- - SHEET 7 OF 6S SH „.. KC. Golf Course Development, 11074 Radisson RO NE Mate, MN N5449 4. .21 A P.'.-C; THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO INKe Elmo, Minnesota ; / EXISTING CONDITIONS r., sziisFr-wa..-14 \ V — \ Carlson - ,, '..S-: --- 0 McCain - 5' E:or at !" C 1I E — ;1 aroaialsri.alairo aaa 44404, .4 4 , 444. 24 4,1 r f`LIIL,TIN4'/4.= Oa, .4:44, 7 aNa ex I t - iotalatarlloroo. oaRioir; Radar '"Fitrarar C-Ltrolrola. orio sk " ttort'?: VeA .444,4 4 4 aa .74.=4" '4447' F 1. t twrrn,t4,,, - \ ; - - 4,4 o Ns ,rooi _7E4 .eor.tee: 0 W N 5 -Pi P 2 9. - : mi Imo., air am 3 10 , 1 LI I \ EE SHEET 5 OF 55 511E:ETS ,K444 44 -4444,44* 20, 1444.1449 44 War Mr. H.C. Golf Course Development, 11071 Rarlisson Rd NE Blaine, MN 5544O "—a R N E 21 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 411I0 Eirno, Minnesota 44004.44/420=41.0144 44 444,4 ,„..ONESGME 4.444 444444.p LANE 4412.1 — / 12 EXISTING CONDITIONS 4 of / 65 -/n S E0 T 1 C ///,' 2 5. SEE SHEET 7 OF EIS SHEETS rA Corlscp r McCain r " utr. I - ; t r 7 r r I £ 4 £ " I r \ \77,7,77-7ni 4%4'1 II r t • t £0. 17.41.,::-`7;Z.77,7771'7:'.717, .7 7,7 rod, \ 7.7 SEE 511 1 T dmde "mdd 7de ts, I 41 Ai thihieh heniii£££ N V' 11 SEE SKEE11 OF 65 SHEE.TS KC, Golf Course Development, 11074 Radisdnd Rd 71E Blaine, 11655449 110W-Li71-10E LAKE 0A ,"/,' 2 7 tn."‘ N, N ,.,...., THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmu. Mont -seta EXISTING CONDITIONS Kr ,'25"Z 771-17: -SECT/ON 2 5, - SW4r4S, 1 I I = „ ; ; ; 7-- \‹: I IV t I ' 1 • t _ ; I / , t i f f , , ,..,, .13 1/ ' t / CI \ , ,. ; fr 1/:,,,,,,:•-• " 4.4Ciir X lt '4e‘ 4- /411Z4W4, t.k -1 --- , = . `/7741"7,':Ir SEESHEET 5 OF 95 SHEETS \ / I / ; I I W 1-/ I P 2 — — — — 1/1: -616 K I / I gcp/ • ' I 6.„ ""\ :!( - / LA ROSE I Orl, 4,•••=--= __1+92.44(''ar• 44,,, 444, -444..4. .30/3.3341 ;i1;sr - ''',/,\ .4 / 11 \ ! j i:11'" •• 4 = I ' 4 ;) ' . ( 3 t5'..- 2 7 t ,"\\I n6 \ WC* Goff Course Development, LLC 11074 Raciisson 00 NE Maine, EI4455449 66. I-1 ORS ES 11 0 E LAKE \\\ THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota 14.444, so, 444.4 me 4axal 142 0.4--rimft / r' „ - r - r EXISTING CONDITIONS 0,7 65 3/3,633-. RI . 1 k;IIq! I I I #### I;###' ####I ; " 44 " I 4:4.i 1 t ; itt Ndj, NJ x:' 77 7 .,..r.„ f ; 1 6g, ... 'i 44 0. . , .„- ..., II . ) I ; '). J ) #?F .. 134.V, 7°'`Ire:rs:r.:71.r:::77.0'77' , . . ,t t . -7r. za, 7., ,7444).;7 ii , ' ., • -i i , c) )A 1 . • )) , ,..-. / ' '44„ — jr/ 25 54444 SHEET 5 OF 65 S44EET5 445 ICI Xjj:75X,4 /44 (x). 5) 59 .1000 P109,6trE Tr ;7. '41 .172. a — 141 7.7 E -t•r1 I ;,R71 ' rd' '=w,, • , 1 j L:41 „.14 • 16, i 7 I I 2 u \ 1 I LF _1 • I \ I 1 I1 _ . 22 I i r L.__ _ arison ccain 151 — r r 7.-77-77.44.84e•Mr' Loa, oa, Mir IrTior. *44 t 441)4*44*41 Eu0 PV, 501. 23. to0rt 555051 V. 51. otk at A vs frAt. *412 nit - e 001 ...D.. 79) 7,7 '5, 75 "e..0,-54322515% 025.057 woe) 9t;rtet'lrai=kt:17',0 rottnre=r4=4,tr'l taa. 19. 900 El LEGAL DESCRIPTION toi 1 50453 1200• N09, B1,470 P., 0.000 Cat, .111,00,0 00,0 CM t/0 *P0 000 0 100. 0g ,» .0,00 0,0,K al v. 40,00 4000 Pit , SW 1,, 0. 0 P., 8444*240*5*4244*5*411449*5144 5. 3 0 Soo.= 10000 tr.L.,'"Zr `L'""""'L ```" Cry 4004714:,,,r 5.11,45 0 CI 2480411ve0 00VIM ea cm 0,000 moo e 50,00 4.1443, 240. 00 .00 0 00 PP' *""r1.‘0 Sa=111r 16.6.61. 555445*248*24*53422*448,4 2=k14e= =1; 4,P=ZUPP70 747,47,;a7,,:ii,ES17:3F, s„.,,',:s71,27:,ACL:rilitty0t ,L1,0 . r00 P, 00, 0 1:40'4 h,o, 6.65.5 16.5. L" LA MISrttet rit4, 0001,000a, 6.566.5. 651151.11 C.000, 0 itte 501000. 00,0 0 sold .000, 561. Cante,00.1 6.-01 11156 611 ,P 0, 0 cent •04 "14t4FiT 66.55.566 211 55 40 aor ow .1. ea 2.1olo raoy, 0m• pt NOTES . V. 00, vm toetystsd 00.0., 0 0,00 om, 156.15 455 600., en 0, ,v0 C00,0,0 3, 4 00,0 . • 544000 adwats 1,4050. 000 ,,, Wri r/%74,677::.iPTI:fir71,i7=5'5117:45' ==717511= ..1166 5.565. 60.. 66.1611516.1........ 0 S90 O 11, Yew 00.,, .0000 ko 00,11, r01. .10 se WS, Oro • alovora oro .0,0 V•2 M.22 t.112., A Ul22. 1* 0 0 ,S,E00,0 Cago00t 10,3 0 0,0, 0 Cm 0.0 615.5 1.5456 SETBACK INFORMATION OM rt. MX LOIS) FROoT 5L-MAcl, 55 Fr. soE SE,VAP, 15 FT, REAR 1330ok44 (00-05 rf, 0015, WM) r08*27 srromN 30 rr. WE WOAD,— no Fl. 2533 sETOMIC 30247, (55-05 rt., otoe Lars) MGM SETBACK ZO rt. (a FT SETELAC, 10 MOM( r ROM 104*1) ME SUB.. REM SCTOMK- 7. LEGEND • 00,00 .00 0,11i• 0001y 10.0.1 • 0.1.• re... .00,04 0 - 00a4{0 R.. .0 ; - 08000 SITE DATA vreNrry MAP TOTAL VIE AMA *420400 Ac, OU11.07 (OONEROM) (MADJTMANCV) AKA TOTAL OW AM, *5/.81 I. 0.07 I (PM Mar 2.SEA40 ... mu. ounoT AREA 204*4.1 AC, 2474,01 1 ((40A) IC,CP) . C0411.01 (OMIERSIOP) ORAIMENAKE) AREA 10-.53 m OMOT A {008) O00Ai044) o Of 4. (tiOk.n. 723.3 . e31101 . .”) {.(aAna.) 155.5 4 (HO,L) ..10 4. D.. WV OWE.) (...r MM.) il/... PC 13.A) 1011 4. CO. 0 00. MUM} OW C.C,...O *4*2*0 4 } 0253 4. Wk. E OW) (..,.M ... (44.A070 *L. AC, 0011.01 * ((i.) (..) 00.07 AC S240A1 ../b AG. Oirii.OT t (080) (4.) *LAC PP 040A/0411 02.20 AC. 000MTO OI 0 AC. (1.0.r0 at., (4 3.113 4- filta+) .15, A44 asnan ti col 241201 I if.) {Mc .... 4 00-0 (W.) tala AC 0,100N (0AWS) (8020K.5) .15 AC 2411.0,' t (4SA) mom tO V AC .1,1,.. .") 007I.,10a .oes AC 040104 if (C10 (C,,,) 40-23 AC. 4*4*01 C ,CA) 0.) *17.11 AC 08(001$" (E4(0520) (00£1158*) 00-11 AC Mot. 4 . tiLla . 014(001a NOR) 11.A) *1.084 4*41.07 3 HPAC (tair osaME,OoM 7045 At 0.1.0t 1 CliT) (*1112204) ... At %MO CI 14(67) (1.1)0 z4.C.9 4 1111101 V WO I7401/.177 11175 AG 201.01V+ WV) (WV V.C.O.1. 0.1$ 4 Know whal* below. Call bolero you dig, H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 RatOlOen Re tif 0(400* 000 50440 axatttil 2 (004) 0*1.01 AA (0415 COM. *0 (KS. 11141661 CO C049 maitor 1,1} P,OM 03w02 Et tCrOC OUTUrt NM) {WTI 0unat f(4,0 Oarrtan a 04 'TOTAL COW MORSE COT AMA t70.20 024 TOTAL MOLE rAtAILY LOT AMA LOON, AO Okt,C,EIT 1.0-r 04r1 5*4444.1137 ,5.890 Stirl O.1.3.13 '41* 20 10,05 COMM. use LOTSMO, =MUD wain.= AMLAOLE HOP 0 P. .CCARCall W.,* P.C.,. PROPOSED ...NCHNIAR ' Azor ow, tam 013,123 (101., 'no:10-.1417.'•.'(ZNArC 0 00001.0 00. 03.01 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota /DIM MUREFE Or LOT!: N/44E LOT CUAC, 0415 CURSE SG. ORM DENSit; NET VENSTY EAMING ZOMPP PeCIMMD Mom DRAINAGE AND UTILITY = EASEMENTS ARE SUM N THUS: t Nan t Sea(e) *10*3*3*20*40*4*4*0 41,0 nertot .rtat.00,2=0 PRELIMINARY PLAT INDEX LL. 0 N [ Cs4 11) I.: 4..5.4418 W.. 4 E.S.RIC,, SaVsVf.TsE 2283.33 20TH TRErr NORTH 2gt 'TR} .vvi,T11 _ _ _ _ _ OUTLOT HH P. OUTLOT B 101 0-11 - S 00.0 1.00000 900/004 ooS OUTLOT C SEE SHEET 20 OF 65 SHEETS 1 / 10100) 011 •.1 0 UTLOT D 0000-11, 000 Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Nadisson R1 NE Mak*, MN 55449 v t. .1; 0000 to oeo. 000 [CVO, 00 OUTLOT F- OUTLOT E .v0,4 2. L4_ v - p000tot 0100000 .00o 400001 - 00.0 0000 0000001 0 - 0000 SSI 000 000. Vors0 010 010 SEE SHEET 11 OF 65 SHEETS THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT / 65 OUTLOT ➢ u_ 0 (f C©rIsgn r McCain OUTLOT F---`+ i20 fesmiiftIooaw tst 0SW. sMsSC Nq+ 21. t Noe, 000; Emt - GmHp 00002fm CAMS #onmo+t - OrWp rwe #wmoYf o - QUMN Se Vert 000 #aefp sips Pea 103St 0000.Se ea M# son nrE 2O1, ',n7'ki ttLt-1-1' t'[k:TFt +tom .90 a.>ress # its4, rs.r.e {p..a0wee:SI SEE SHEET 11 OF 65 SHEETS H.C. Golf Course Development 1 1074 ROd155U0 Rd NE Moine. MN 55400 OU'TLOT H ata+.rm .t.a 1. r ".°mot+ wt THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, M+nnrsota PRELIMINARY PLAT SEE SHEET 10 OF 65 SHEETS 9 SEE SHEET 12 OF 65 SHEETS` H.C. Golf Course Develop F opmen 11074 I{adisson RP NE Blaine, PIN 55449 Pun ttot 4 ,�RKi 4ti THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota 18 alt. earl. PRELIMINARY PLAT HORSESHOE LAKE / / , / 5 H SEE SHEET 13 OF 65 SHEET SHEETS 2 5 WAX •01. 011 01000 09, OUTLDT D •01.....• 0,(10,1 ra0i. . 00000XXS 00 X 0Z- 040004%10%xr" .00"'"001002' *hr Ete {RULE X rir0 ..,00 N.C. Golf Course Development 11074 Radisson Rd NE [Maine, MN SS44q 5 ,r, \ 01009 WY 10 { 6 e 00,04.0, 7 \ • - Ont. 0.00.00. CFy •00^0.0 • - glat.• Xxxl 100•0001 0 - Oxon= Sal Xx PS• Xxx.0 ..0.101 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota r- 19 *TAX *XL 6 18 ses. 11 .04024 "Pk PRELIMINARY PLAT F 65 SHEETS OUTLOT D attfikwi. N 5 14 1 F" 2 HORSESHOE LAKE SEE SHE 11 rt 4444> • — 0.00 19,000440* Ottaty *mot * — Newt* 0.0to 30000. 0 — tknotst Stt 00 00* **0.1' ofth tt3 4014 one dm* to ins 10a0ttti RoinV 1**0**1 *** 000, AtrIT tat 14 OF 65 SHEETS 1. 1 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11079 lisUisson Rd NE Blaine, MN 55449 OUTLOT V R THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT Carlson McCain SEE SHEET 13 OF 65 SHEETS HORSESHOE LAKE fe. non ea tare rni en. 7P) 0041.1,11 We. to* ae vo;kh fto.or. nertn ocettelr neura — SEE SHEET 15 OF 65 SHEETS Oa. See non.. liert. OM KZ ja,„,,,tedee, wax .C. Golf Course Oevelopment, LLC 11074 litazfeson 00 NE Blaine, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUES AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT SEE SHEET 14 OF 65 SHEETS - wnxa ww,mea r. it - o.ww raaaa ua«e O - tlmrnts SN kt ✓bv. IA* - 105 .01 H.C. Golf Course Development, 1074 nadi$sen R# NE Blaine, MN S5449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT 15 / of r 65 ; 0 r • V31:2E SEE SHEET 17 OF 65 SHEETS ,,,,,_ / -----:;, i , IN, t. ....... w / I 1 4 1 - .. . \ - - .., ---„/ M1 ; OUTLOT 4 t kI: ' . ... .. A l „;,,,,,,........ f...... . . .- ... :;222'anftronto 95 cadson ------- ;'E-n:F,E,'-,--- McCain ''''"=' 4 ET" . I QUTLOT r 1,12711,71...2 ,f2 • r \ i .., --. , - r - 0t1110,.„...1 0 LAKE ROSE 13,7,1,74,1rT,r 9, T.? '‹ ,/' ; f.. ',Zoo / +4, r t J LAKE ROSE G :// a f2fn wActii,":c;ToN cc4„zn•- 11g3;474'4 RI;;1-17 OF WA' PLAT rr`,51 EEETEI EEE'ElEIE1.1 ErEE. \ EE:E'N'E'L EME 111S,0 TOTH STREET (co;;;n, STATE A.0 M14)44)4)Y Ter. X.1) C. ol Course Developmen 11074 Radfssor, Rd NE S$449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake arm Mi,nowta Mono. W. haws, Wo towa Woof in of nor.. tol Soca. 2-2, row.. n Ana orat.. 47 bat.. WW1,. to4 Dow **lava C.., tamommt • - asood. 41,g,,met o - fi,al .1 RA 4004 tnti',4t PREUMINARY PLAT 6 SEE SHEET 18 OF 65 SHEETS 1,0 SEE SHEET 16 OF 65 SHEETS Course Development, LLCTHE ROYAL GOLF CLUB LUB AT LAKE ELMO MS 41%1 11079 Ra tli55on Rd NE Lake Elmu, Minnesota Blaine, MN 55997 0 UTLOT D nww, E,= PRELIMINARY PLAT 17 o65 "SEE SHEET 27 OF 65 SHEETS IJ1 1— LLI LIJ Ln 0 1 w uJ f) ( CariS°n 1) McCain 4 I t ijft - ;0000 10000.000 0010,40.001.011 - 0001. 0001 041001001 0 0 000000 501 **& 000 11.00.0 101.01 tre'Vor=1701","tortIP 100000 000pe It.. 00011040 0 060 Hann 1040101 Oat 2 9' L. SEE SHEET 9 OF 65 SHEETS 1 0 ..." 0000E0 00. \ U- 0, 0 ,111 uJ LLJ Ln Lto 0 $ :--I ‘1., I 0 1-$ $ \ 0,, '1. ‘ 0 / 0 \ I— ' 1, 00 ?'', '11. ' '0 1.1.$ 1 r \ ‘"<*r \ LO , ; / ,...,: / I I SEE SHEET 19 OF 65 SHEETS 1 ., w ..... 0 OUTLOT D 11,13.4.0•9 ".4 N.C. Golf Course Deveiournent, 11014 izadms,ori 0690 fgaine, PIN .69449 `,........„ 7. '-"----Z4.1-^4,,_,.,, >I • 7 • I '1\ 1 N i ‘N, , $1 -a \ I \ \ ' 0 i me ROYAL�LECWBATLAKE ELMO 20 / PRELIMINARY PLAT 0$ Lake Elmr, Rimnewka / 65 D UTI.OT D • - c..,— b✓0,00 OUH, Ya..n.9 aa.a.t o- ow,F rr nb1 S* ..Rf aa]0, SEE SHEET 22 OF 65 SHEETS H.C. Golf Course Development, 11074 Radisson Ra NE Blaine, MN 55949 lc THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT "D 2 0. —avapv,1— Nurit;rt s "JOY "1.0 NM, Ns Et7-2121.4, 0 2 5" tss OUTLOT D OIITLOT AA iS,Lre 9' 24 ,t4aN.N. tt.N11 z:2/ 24 23 SEE SHEET 21 OF 65 SHEETS 10 JJL 4,11 NveNE .1 a. tgr ter., 0,210 A,* iNart, — SNt ,5 403'61 —N NSS. s ts...Nst ,SS-SNIS.NNSSNSS.:StS.SS j I I t t t t 28 0 FN't 31 7 ; ; 0 20 -; 19 04.43: ./.......... . ............ -, ,, ..... . SEE SHEET 23 OF 65 SHEETS .. ,.... . .,. .. . ,, . ,.,... ,........... . .„,. ,....,... . , ) r- .. .„„ H.C. Golf Course Development, LI-C THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 11074 Raisson Rd NE 014ine, MN 55449 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 1"7"17 ass 4.. PRELIMINARY PLAT 14) tit LU 1 111 10 10 11.; 0 CZ NS ui 10 (1) 111 114 14.9 J LO 0 CO LU 144 22 7 of 6 OUTWT z C) OUTTAT Y .ea.I o..ow .harht.. r..,n3r °o uemnt Om. rose ....ma a . ev.muw Sam w», aoR.a .am as wss sty nn+ nvt,.r1 e tvr v r M©cCain Io al,A.a <n Ao,va.aR EE SHEET 22 OF 65 SHE 14 9 MAIS 4 vn f Course Development, 1074 Etatl105o0 Rd NE Blaine, MN 554.9 C 38 401.11.01 2 ai3,ia5 qR 34 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 4 to Elmo, Mlnnesuta O SWOT U PRELIMINARY PLAT Tx 20 16 cren von cc 24 OUTLOT BB 'SEE SHEET 25 OF 65 SHEETS ourse Developm 074 Rdd45on Rd NE Maine, MN S5449 Wc ww Cwct., Sa, •,m Pwwwww Itaced wkww 61 WOW 19 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake. Elmo, Minnesota OUTLOT D PRELIMINARY PLAT I 50 Iv 1 8 OUTLOT DD OUTLOT EE z06;40 R. SEE SHEET 26 SHEETS f Course Development, LLC 11079 Ra0lsson Rd NE Blaine. MN 55940 OUTLOT GC OUTLOT ff THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LANE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY PLAT OUTLOT D LU W of 65 I ARTz- r`t,f T I Aim: 11 kis I v L 411.1 1.0 r fitte IF aaaa trqtraettIttr':_i 4 7 "Art A ttt ta, 2077-1 SMEET ACR;7I 171="alr ASA6A11477 fly" LAM •TIZ.V.L1 LBUI-11 E... *XI 11.00 eft omwr .at 4v, 4+1 Coaarrv,. tot 4, 4.1. Tootrekt V, Ran. 21, Ur ommotl .1nwe Eatt 'P toa c.. aaj Oorktitsx Pmod Ike.amot -on tse Th�oo. iftrast lete-t AS .01 1;1 13 1.7tt 12 14. SILVSA.A. far 10 OUTLOT DD ,SEE SHEET 2 10 Alamo ssn. 26 :tom no. r 2 OF 65 SHEETS M.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radirion PO NE Blaine, MN 554,9 11 HON 2077) M;RTH S111--ET Not-M-B 12 21 P. Mk. ma. 15 •4/./111. tttttt, Mt. awn, 0.04 - M- g I IR,* g r• --,___-„,-,..titztrt-t:::= -------- -1 *1111.110 ob, OUTLOT GO •Kr47 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota ..„ OUTL I 1 I / 15 : 16 .et I 1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 51) 26 of 65 1.1.1 111 2C ()) OUTLOT PT' a! a+iale 12 Cctrisql / McCain 0r — — — — — — — — — . 2cm s ;REET 2 5' e 261571 20 leClae aalY OUTLOT 11 .aieta79 ta” . ... - - . . . SEE SHEET 21 OF 65 SHEETS 23 taaCsa nag 011113 31 '0:0014 -ea 01, 2 , 0 UTLOT A , SEE SHEET 20 OF 6 H,C, Golf Course Development, LLC 1074 R7ilisson110 NE Blaine, MN 55449 0 UTLOT C 2 Rae:ea-as eaten naae,a era teat e ,Ta We, 1-at t, Garfiatraaat eat a, abela-ae 25 00 .0 00 .000: 0. 000 0 »000, 0 000 000 01-04-1 • - Saateees ae,eaexeasai SHEETSDe.alte See ara Faae. feeeetc reta iaaa ae,a1 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO PRELIMINARY PLAT Lake en', Mirineanta 652276 SEE SHEET 9 OF 65 G Course Development, LLC 11074 Radissnn Rd NE Brine, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO L4ke Etmo, Minnesota _art N AN LEGENR.. 0.11. PROPOSER P«scgn tt sc�aw tatt irsninams j OA% VALVE. nac»ewPax utmost NU ITUNS. aw SITE INDEX 10TH STREET N (CSAH 1j7) H.C. Goff Course Oevekopmen t t074 Radlssan Oa NE Blame, MN 5E449 -H THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mmncsata PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 10TH STREET N (CSAH 10) McCn H.G. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 R45i1son Ra NE N554C, MN 55449 WL-1 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LLAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mlnne$oto PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 65 OU TOT 0 ' \\A vTilp.:/strusliirroom EEE LAKE RRSF WL-1 100 YR HWL = 853,4 kIN 0NR# 82011200 „d „—, 0„. Deo,. , .1,11t1 Z17., 1211/110.1(111 UK — 10TH STREET N (CSAH 10) 12'11~111 UNE ta 1 1- H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 1107.1 Ralik -son Rd NE Biaine, MN 55449 THE ROYAL Goa CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake ERno, Minpeakta BENCHMARKS 0 WAR 1.4.14,1. 11.1.104 (111111E01 WOW) tt ta, 00.A. 0104 tawtkot ta" $41.5.4 C/11,0 60 27 WOW L. U.* WW1 (101,131.11 W.) - ref Otanuoi 11.1.11n.atcn 111.4 (NOP .3. PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 'SEE SHEET 391 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11E74 Radissiln Rd NE Wale , MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 65 RETAINI `OUTLOT AA WL-6 \ (INCIDENTAL POND OUTLOT - l 1 . , f I , , f , (corium .„.„,_, -,,-•,-7,-:7;1,::,,,,,,,:::,..-,,,.,,,,,. p McCain OUTLOT AA POND HC off Course Development, lte34 Rectisson Rd NE Blaine, Mel R5449 THE OYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO BEN KS Slat. 04.1 PRELIMINARY SITE & Lake Elmo, Mineola UTILITY PLAN OUTLOT 0 ROYAL POO_ OUTLOT 7' MccCain }(INGS LANE N 10 OUTLOT BB If Course Development, 11074 Radlsson Rd NE Blame, MN 55,47 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO :ake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 65 OUR OT DD RETAINING WA c % 3 1 2 _ ROYAL B04.111_ ,EyAk0 N L RETAINING WALL DEt 35) tSEE SHEET ay' H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Rion Rd NE Otairm, MN 55449 OUTLOT II WL— 7 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lk o Eirrio, Minnesota rfIttlanffierale 0,4 , PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN OUTLOT OD tue roe i KC. Got f Course Development, 11074 Radlssan itd NE Biome, M4,1 55449 UTIOT/G THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 37 / of 765 23 OUTL©TIGC ET -NORTH OUTLOT FF OUTLOT II C. Golf Course Developmen+ I 1074 Rad}ss0n 00 NE 89ainn. MN 00449 C THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, hlinneeola ay HH OUTLOT A OUTLOT a C LARKS PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN G 65- Go€f Course Devoe 3t074 Reetsson Rd Blaine, MN 554 9 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN el / 65 H.C. Golf Course Devetopment. LLC 11074 dtaaisson Rd NE eteine< MN 5544E THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mmncrola PRELIMINARY SITE B. UTILITY PLAN 'SEE SHEET 401 / / ; . rt; H.C. Go ir otirse v" eto"1;nienC1,1 11074 Radi,Son /7050 Blaine, 745 55449 WL —16 POND OUTLOT M 5 ren,01 OU TLOT BF., , WA>. tbt‘twi StAtt POItitt Wel) top et itert.; t.titt,t SW.. Ott. ttt 23 Mtittn S.. ;Oka; tOtrtottEtt Mitt) - too ett tort. 0*7 Ektmt....... NW* 015 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, MinnQsala ISLE SHEET 411 PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN , 13 41 /: / 65 OUTLOT A OyThOT HH 2OTH - STREET- NORTH REYANiINC WA EXISTING PARKING LOT ENCH19ARK H.C. Go U Course Developmen 11074 Rakisson RO 71E 133ne, RSN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMD Lake EIm°, 1?Innl:501d PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN ISEESHEET 4:01 / WL-22 HOR5DSHQF LAKE - (NGVD 29) MN DNR #82-0074P OHW - 876.8 100 YR HWL 877.4 INAVD 88 e (NGVD 29)+0.10) WL-15 '-lINCIDENTAL) N.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radisdon Rd Ne Biome, RRI 55440 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lako HMO, MnneSaLa PRELIMINARY SITE Bk UTILITY PLAN 43 / / 65 OUTLOT D Golf Course Development, I»LC 11 74 Eadissnn Rd NE Warne. MN 55449 0 OUTLOT I OUTLOT J THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO L.ikc Elmo, Mlnnesolo PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN 44 / or 65 OUTLOT F OU STREET NORTH OUTLOT G WL-17 -, REPAtHIHC. WX OUTLOT H 15 I � ete seeds, t ! ISEE 51tEY4q C. C,off Course Development, LLC 11074 Ralisson Rd NE Elaine. MN 55449 OUTLOT I THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO t aae Elmu, Minnesota PRELIMINARY SITE & UTILITY PLAN o• Know what's below. Call before you dig. „aa Icgtfer" 4$ A %P , - - , ---,,, -- , , a -,.„ — -=-- ---.,...-,-- rf'-`'5 N.C. Golf Course Deuetopfnent, LLC 11074 Rabisson Rd NE @Maine, MN 55449 ------- _____ „ THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota ran.,[o[aa o•DuatoK afArEit s[ves BA. Duns, snovosom ts11:5.7 VA,C Ian.. WA SCrt VT-0,3d LRGERD 445499 PROPOSED 1[9.MR fT. nrig. SPO, r[rost. 0..0o 6•.[1.C. ...o14** [114£ s s fIsLE *sups.- sen, oterec [041[[50 86/A5[Os • [s.s. s[o. 4448 4, Fel (9, KT,. W. S. SINT[IAIVS, sclu. [885 858482105 1 4845 SY TOM bar,. WSW: [5.11[4 [[Sts[41[0.0i,[41" (3[E[fr, •K, PO[Ss." [••[ iss ow., [Mal..., 4[0[1109459r[tttli,P1 0141 St r-SAARY fs.",4 eit.sus,•• els attS, Mann, ri.:Fla .3 [Sin SOLOtli ,L9007 4f5 SLIOtt•litikS Ao•orro„,,,,[e.rr.. (mamma moo ro BENCI.IMAI-OsS [Wart * " 7 =95 1 !XVI} Pre Oat, E[saf4s ••• •:[.[C1-.6 AM INDEX 46 of / 65 20TH STRLI NORTH SVTR WETLAND 17 nr / T D OUTLOT G RETMN73 WALL P7 WL-17 100 )77 NM. A. <FROM DOWNS LAKE) RETMG WALL r3 tle /WV* Mh/t/o/ t/{614 rsrt Sircti rel HC Goff Course Development, LLC 11074 Nadmsory Rd NE Blame, MN S5444 \ ' , \ .,‘',1r=r4. , \ \ \ A NUR INUATA.'" \: \, :, \\11\ \ N s NIAL VINO „,, : \ , \No THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO lake EINNN Ilinnesoca BENCIIIVIARKS PRELIMINARY GRADING EROSION CONTROL PLAN 47 of / 65 son r McC. n 15EE 8HEET49J H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 1107a R2tlisson Rd IJE Maize, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO La,,e Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4 nl 65 WL-92 91011,59SROR tAKCHORSERtiOE LAW - MORD 201 ONR 82-7411 ORR 9 876.8 100 YR 141111 8774 1 - 555555,55,55, 1191 t1,5191,11,11.11,99., '1'49'2' AA-34- 91'19 -1'19-99 OUTLOT D H.C.Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Rae87011 ntt NE Blaine, 149 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 49 / cl 6 NW-BI OUTLOT A " rR hVrL -alai OUTLOT C �"'7u$ANG PARKING LOT ISEE SHEET 511 C. Golf Course Devetopmen 1107d Redman Rd NE Diane, MN 55449 OUTLOT 0 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, fdmnesola PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 65= RETAINING *&u WFTLAND NW-65 MN DNR 62-417W 100 YR HYL - 077.3 (NGYD 29) j}{*MI — (NGw 29)1 0.101 Course Development, LLC 9 tO74 Rad on Rd NE £iiatna, MN 55,49 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO PRELIMINARY GRADING Lake Elmo, tamnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OUTLOT DO mit MEET 94 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radddon Rd NE Warne, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN SW—B1 \ MO YR HIVE w WNW\ —,---, 9)Cariscr 1 OUTLOT DO RETARGNG W RETAINING W RETAJMNG WALL 00 _ . sky ,..7.41r. wNWNW, ky're, , k No* SS, OT , $ .74114! two, .roo k SWIer, WM, / . r w % N.7.'•,,,, T1,10-. p‘1,1,',,,,e„ , , ....,„. • . , ----,--,2:- i 1 ' • ...., • " ' ""° ..;,,, A., H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 11071 RadlIsson Rd NE Lake Elmo, Minnesota Maine, MN 55449 . - 40 4.41,L9,4 \ PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN / 65 , 0UTLOT BB Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 11074 Fatlh$sgn Rtl NE Lake EUno, Minnesota dla�ne. I/O 55449 OUTLOT 0 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN OUTLOT BB POND 100 YRH H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO I107a Ra Ji55on Rd NE lake Elmo. Mmocsota Blame, MN 55,19 PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN :Ci3Atw pm) —A n PEILAND 5 NKL s 888.5 100 YR M.. 588,5 OUTLOT Z Orie OUTLOT T D.C. Gaff Course Development 11074 RadfSzon Rd NE 9tame, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO ( PRELIMINARY GRADING Lake Elmo, Minnesota & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 57 / or 65 .C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radisson Rd NE Btakle, r4t4 55449 THE ROVAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota / 7/ /27 / 4 •R, .// PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN .1 y, 11y 11 1 / 65 }15115055NE LA155510110'0005 I 400 UN OW 62-740 4010 875.8 100 YR HAL 077.4 (NAVD (N (hCOriSqr, I I 7- McCain i oi6k, kr, . * Golf Course Development, LLC 11071 Rathsson Re NE 0iain55 MN 55449 / / /.// // /` • / / ,/ / / / • / / / / // THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lak0E10:5 5Itnnes0ta V Its so Ettt'31110Reft."."""1 OR MI AI de5 , 4 / PRELIMINARY GRADING & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 9 / of 6 SINGLE FAMILY HOLDDOWNS FOR NO-100' LOTS LOOKOUT RAMBLER MODIFIED RAMBLER ri SINGLE FAMILY HQl DROWNS FOR 55' — 65 LOTS MODIFIED WALKOUT LOOKOUT MODIFIED LOOKOUT MODIFIED RAMBLER SINGLE FAMILY HOLDDOWNS FOR 65; L OTS WALKOUT M00IFIF,Q WALKOUT LOOKOUT TURF ESTARI ISHMFNT now Ez .0 mtat.r s.w. rcwA as S.. fs WV n w cnu awste, K'tuu4 G' V Ci WV, tut wt. wortExfxa»,>%w w„was.,cam Httvv,r MEV V.I. ftar re IEa .r rw . rcewAt NOE Amn p ix TVE i At s 1Of4 MT Awt (Dg' Mry ,s ,.Ett rraewm. me r w-ro--ro A+ PLO inn Vt. .ws. Course 1107k Raft Warne, M SINGI E FAMILY HOLDQOWNS FOR 55' — 65'I DTS (PRATT), LOOKOUT he St. fiaf MO FIE') LOOKOUT MODIFIED RAMBLER LOT BENCHING DETAIL LC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesula ,SINGLE FAMILY I{OLD00WNS FOR 60',I (YTS,(GORHAM) MODIFIED WALKOUT GRADING PLAN LOT KEy_ DETAILS 60/ or 65 TIP/CAL PONO SECTION CITY OF LAKE ELMO c c 18 g td.10481.P.V.M.k 4t6 Lassamo 3 MSS. ist.tre — ss. SOUSSE. ,,,Auee so. ESSO1 STASSE ookr,REEEmt sows. 1.46SE thlYS 111.. USEEESE ESESS ESsE ESTS8.10. SESESS E SEKEASS MO ESCROD. MEM. SST FISES ES. f'r—Y-Y-0 Sas tql. PMENE Leant 808888884 VON VEAVIffi ,EX 4888 SEE INFILTRATION BASINS TEMPORARY SEDIMENT BASIN W/PERFORATED RISER PIPE TYPICAL STREET SECTION mixt D eo' 28' ,r+ sEcr.. TYPICAL STREET SECTION sm..; r (STA LUSO is SSESO) 70' R/el - 40' B/B *AVM, Ver. rt.,* tAilEy* TYPICAL STREET SECTION . smEe14 6.18SF.01.A88 60' R/ri 28' EVIE IENDIT4 • ED - ---- Y--, ;;;--•-- -- -' l'-`7g1,,- ' -; - F-1-.7.1:" Lk' TYPICAL STREET SECTION sruxT (sTA. 45426 Is 60450) 65' (1/0 - 28 We '64I TYPICAL STREET SECTION sum p (sp...ao 74 4842.5) CO' R/A - 28' B/D • gig rt osErt . TYPICAL STREET SECTION sosu 8 (so, sow o IOW) 80' 0/01 - 28' Ei/ 8 ., • ,•„ i-E '66,0111 EsEt. SSISSE Asaaf 0* MO VV{ Ma/ Vg assEt H.C. Golf Course Devetopment, LLC 11074 Radisson Rd NE BlaiRe, MN 55449 • E505161. LOD( RESIDENT./ STREET SECTION (1.61.1.1 SESS. Cll'Y OF LAKE ELMO1 TYPICAL STREET SECTION sAKET 0 (SMER MR. so. 314430 IT 52ET5) 95` - 50' BRE. TYPICAL STREET SECTION SWEET 0 (STA So-(90 NOM) — 442" 13/0 TYPICAL STREET SECTION imital A (WO( ERANO 518,8488 to 1E262 4/12 - EVB 10' DIRMINOUS ACCESS ROAD THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LANE ELMO Lake Elmo, INinnesols DETAILS 912 910 908 908 904 120 1,0 902 20 MODU 918 914 912 MODULAR RETAINING (890 SF) 60 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #3 922 (00A.SF) 920 91 916 914 912 910 914 912 100 120 1,0 TAINING WALL #5 31 SF) cr mu/ 120 140 100 160 200 i10 900 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #2 (2080 SF) - - 20 40 50 80 100 120 140 908 904 902 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Rad,ss0n Rd NE 01a100. MN 5$449 160 190 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #4 (1100 SF) 200 80 100 120 140 180 180 2D MODULAR RETAINING WALL #6 (625 SF) 20 40 $0 B0 100 1w0 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Eno, ,Minnesota 260 RETAINING WALL PROFILES 210 6 908 904 902 900 Carlson McCain MODULAR RETAINING WALL #7 (3100 SF) .4.11. sx# or *ma 100 120 140 160 leg 200 220 240 260 260 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #9 (1065 SF) IV. OF .41 918 918 914 912 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #11', (920 SF) 20 120 140 360 160 200 270 884 882 320 340 20 1398 894 892 890 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #8 (1125 SF) 20 40 00 80 100 320 140 160 ILO MODULAR RETAINING WALL #10 (1598 SF) 100 120 140 140 160 200 220 240 260 280 .C. Golf Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 110)9 Rani.. Rd NE Lake Elmo, Minnesota Blaine, MN 55949 RETAINING WALL PROFILES 64 / of 65 890 888 886 884 882 8 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #12 (1950 SF) 930 20 40 SO 00 100 120 140 850 160 200 220 240 280 240 902 900 896 894 892 690 888 686 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #13 (2950 SF) friP Of AWL. 120 140 1612 140 200 220 44 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 360 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 41074 Radi4son Rd NE Blame. 901 55449 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #I4 (1530 SF) L 924 100 120 140 ISO 160 ZZD 240 260 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #15 (893 SF) THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake E,f710 Minnesota RETAINING WALL PROFILES C/461.11111,irellX100 — ---- /Call before you dig, LSSAC OVLAC /AREA 1t§,Amc ALS, iLCOA10 Alv, AREA SIOACIVALS tit 4 AREA 11 .44AC /13 fLOOAC 4 AREA Z ALB 1.05AC 7 , ti01t 1111L11611r.1„. 110. 1,0tr AltEx.,1= VICINITY MAP KEY 00 MYR 11111111.0,1011,1,14111:11 0401411.0458051430405411110400 owt./.131(11. 74400 020 CON:Egra TT. 94TEN T2-191. TREE PRE4911991004 ELM TI99-110 TREE was 5 /1/11 223 0020 i 5 7.41 9,94 2.00 7 03 1 10 EDO 4 7,104 ,2 0E4 0E0 0-04 TOMES 2E73 9 14 35.23 105 0.91 8.44 111 011 0.00 :3 990 1E0 004 0,10 445 0,00 101015 5990 2912 H.C. Golf Course Peyelopment, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 1 1974 Radtsoon Rd NE L/99 HMO, MinnoSota Blame. MN 559 49 RFNCHNLARKS_ ';+;/007sta.. p.m 1/1,141,1 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Ti of / 25 20TH STREET NORTH AREA AREA 13&93AC REMOVALS 14,08AC NEE SHEET T9J Course Oeveiapment, LLC" u074 Rad:ssan Rd NE Blame, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, thnnesota CHT,IARKS / TREE PRESERVATION PLAN I T o 25 _ REMOVALS 1;.08AC C. Go f Course DeveEnpment, to74 RadtSSmn Rd NE Cilain4, Mkk S4' i44 AREA 2 AREA 1,B5AC REMOVALS O.88AC - - RKS a fk* THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake elmo, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN H.C. Golf Course Development, 11074 Paa,sson PO NE Blame, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Pnnnesota We ANY 44 Rem 4 TO Vat 44 IPA VINO TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T4 / /�t25 1,4901114 1i UP WO H.C. Golf Course Developments LLC 11074 aadisson Rd NE eialne. MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Ellno, Minnesota -zz TREE PRESERVATION PLAN of T5 / / 25 nat 44444 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Pinnesora '6 or 25 AREA i AREA 2136AC OVALS DAVAO AA Art; [SEE S){EET T41 AVO WAS • H.C. Golf Course Development, 41074 Ra diSson Rd NE 6€aane, MN 55049 C PHASE THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota •AB VAX TREE PRESERVATION PLAN or /25 .C. Golf Course Development, LLC i3O74 Radtsson Rd NE 0 ame, MN S5449 BENCIIMARKS THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mlnnc$nta TREE PRESERVATION PLAN [SEE SHEET T21 AREA 14 _AREA S.45AC REMOVALS O.00AC 1.90AC` EM4VALS _ O.B4AC C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radissun Rd NE 0lalnc. MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo. Maineyata BF..NCHILARK.S TREE PRESERVATION PLAN KING51 ANE AREA 14--:-- s' AREA 1.45AC REMOVALS O.00AC Course Ceve9opment, LLC 11074 Rad,ssan Rd NE S;mne, MN 55449 Wit THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lal a [De10, Minnesota e IOW TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 25 o VD ON Course Developme 13074 43ad=s000 Rd NE Sta:ne, 001 55449 o THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO LaAe Elmo, Minnesota Vex MR TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T 25 Iowa n ..tea...».. Msrjaki .1010 Vg * WORM PHASE I 0 WY MC FSEf SHECrn41 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Raq.Ssan Rd NE Ermine, MN SS44 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Flinn, I-Ihnneso[a TREE PRESERVATION PLAN TI2/ of 25 AREA \AREA RE.IQVALS e Development, L 74 R4d8509 44 NE , MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lal.e Elmo, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 111,0+04 .1118.114 PHASE', !SEE SHEET 112 Course pevelopment, LLC 1 ?ON Rd&sson Rtt NE Waffle, MN 55a49 .2'4AC QAC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Htno, .Anne1ota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN SEE SHE Course 11074 IX B0 ne, THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota Agt V6 Val TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 25 AREA $ AREA 1.76AC REMOVALS cLO©AC STREET NI BENCHMARKS Course Development, t f 074 RatsRd NE 6.aine, ME 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mlnnesoca TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ISSE SHEET T141 Course Development, 11074 Eadmson Rd NE Blame, MN 554E9 AREA 11 REA B.24ACV EA4OVALS O.O©AC_- THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN or25 Course Development, 11074 Raddnon Rd NE Woo., MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Minnesora TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T18 / 2 2 1 2 11' 1 1 11 3 — ; , .......... ....1___3„,: 1 .... gi ggii J----1----,---- , .:,.., ,,, ill ' P• 1 1 "I',!1.1 II MI 14111-134 4.; 51311! 1 igA 1 - - ---- a 3i24m,--414,,,,,,,I;,...c.,,,,,,,,,:,,_:.R3.,„___,, 4 .ii , 0 35iffillidliW34F' ;Iiir1"— , • lil .14111111-ki •33:1103;i33i Lf1 '• ,14 . - -3 -. ': ''''- r't " '' 21-"iffifil ol .11.ffigiiiiplifo ----1110zill ,,,.. - 1114111411111.1111W18 1 f;11I1f-Wl.g1R111.311111 g.'.5qa:lpg,gliagiig ugHigvizOq ‹fr, 3 LJ,2' u.; ...rkTJ 1 1 . - ih— ---- 111.......i11. 4,........................5f ,34.1,,.......1.....u,,..t. 1 - W 11/11131511Hf11.11:1111111111111111,111511111311131.111111;11111111:111.1111.11:111;1f ;11111.1111111111115_ Li 8 1 WWI '' iMMdilliall3M;1;11LUTIUMIM i i;::4H ' qtifHi- , ' 1 illillt 2 1111111111111r81111111"1111"111111111111 22;1 1 '''g 1 I2 w iii..t..1,1=2:47,1R;13,....,ASIS2,R;;;;9;;;4,442,7.7.;::;2R.4.3n“:1:,•;-,Xiii.19..3.C....,,,Cm2,3,...“,,,--.42,;.73,14.:.74 0 gq-E. li;3114001°11IIIMOi ' ci;;100ii3,&10-4111,11!;44;10ijiijiljil""; '; Willifillil_V;i , 1 1 -.Mli,IMIWIliftllyiyOtttiild,„,i.trafli 1 0 j 1111=11- -31111341.C118'18 41111141”114'15115.1pif111.111138%1101 i,mai,Aw4ag-Li 11 i EE PRESERVATION PLA j t .;.:.;.2.1.;;;;.... if . . ; 1111//1/1 1 05111111111111111?1/11111111111E511111114118111111111E111111E111111111111111.1,1111511111 .11 111111iltli11111 ‘if.1351!illr010411,110!!!!"111' 31111111,11111 1.10 A8 .f -1* 11`Ll'0101Pii;111;011 4. "31410,;J41;,;;01/31;111;;S:: ts-xsifigig ii§!§ ;fff1.,,ff;f1J131141-1111falfl111.1fyI 1111111111C111111,1111551511111BEE1i11 11148A W .10 ! ! 1 1 1 ! xxxxX x x.e.xXxwwx orx a -;- 2- ,ff -1.11ff— . f;111151111111t5f111111-11;1111111111.1.1:1111811f111f1111Piff1/1 .1 MOMP1 ! ;;41 fffftEfg Et8/8i11,886888888,8g tIg&A ; ;;;P:' A'0,11,3 111 1"1"'''iniifilffliffl1111i111 l'1111111"33g Pi I , 44.4444[ Mill1711-4.1.1044111,i11107...ARatg4M4AMoilitit,41,12Ma4.434444.7A.n4gA4.‘.4;.;;;4;,,,UQ.11. 111111 it I111111 f - pit -f - I ' II "'""z .11€111 i3111t0t1;1!tY111 Ilill;f1181881E1011i13333;ItiMili1131;13,11 11111/1113 1113111j61111(41;11111411111111i44:1"111,4,0. 4;,1:42,;,1A,k4t4Amg;;ZIFV;;114,;v51;1&%9151212ZIMS$1;r: IPMKSV;22 11 11 “SiS,$,Wi$1,05'47Viii“,5 iiflhiHIHiflHJ f , i z ..„. % .Tg.t.tx.ts..,.......,......21.,t4, Pithffithininni9M!,IdtMOH114//1111411111110.0 ' 1111ffithffil eiaAALIAAitiAigiatA ,t I'--------i--- -- — -----------------.-1-----..----I--.i—'41---- #!OIY,Sr!.4prgilt'a";s,aoqCaTllsgT;1'nTTgi'5:,15Fi't;15FA!T,T2TOS4Ail;ti!7!YST4iSftlg 'ag,1:i!,;St,:;; iiii10,4104111iiiiiIJIHMILI MI tifil,t!!!PAI ; ;111;litlitifiiiiiiiiiliffii, 1 kkuiiiii410i4ii01.;;„;s14IMI Allf1i11111011„. ;I:tilfiliiiilimxilll : ta 1lIMPA511.1.filin HIMI HIM H in IHHHIME455MMAHMMHIMMMIHIHnitilii: rti I ta e 3t- w.MMM,%......W.MNAMMUN4M I i 1 i W.R.WMMXX f 1..1-: 1 , 1 . .1 t 555555555515551 W];WiliVi],,:!“-i]WiiiI,W0,1,i1X]llis.i.W.i!WW.U.ES•55.“.],',W“,“;“MU,WE,]$i iii i31ii31' :g5LilklIIIPIiIiIliIiIWIii 1- a ITUT i ,r lilkAillSi]flffiijSiilMitilltIjSntOS:i ,4) 111,1 • 5E1%1111. 'HM1111111111 33,6 If 11].],21],1 ].,351111111S06 laa 4 .41 j&t2;t:Idn4INYIWAI 2,7111AM44t1WiggIAMNOTIMIANIUNIR I +444 W"'"OW""t] , - 1“i75611*MW;p2M.si:]]irninlv,“:11$,0p.sgipsilE14.5]'i$,Z,],iii;SE;ii;i14LWOW,FiiViiiiii,F1S1-11' , : 0 4 !ill .-i; iiiiil- ' 111111"'' li 6,AAjli 'qlLiiiiiiiiiinlillif, R iiii MiWatelMiTii 1 t i'llsallilliittm , -- , *s,Assm f : „ 4 4p !Th!Al"1 I 1111144flaWiliiiiiii114IPT ;1114041, -*; A$]Efsfi]5ELtiliFirn]ThIMWMESSVi41.2SEff.]5.1fS5],21 1 1 WI/VMMIpli]t:11]J3 fii]al IMASIS8nnan,§1],11,§ tb,si4 AgA g 5! AXA 4SXRZni'll“iMul;44;tt4Att°R.,,.StrIt.t.t2MAC,414RMXAQA.02.,S.ge.1.,...214.5..1.2,.ZSM,,,W,;.1143, .. ! NINIIffillliging11111111114,11111111411' !IlaililittO 111111,11111] . , l'ik4]..“-ARS,A,IiH ilf.MIVOIEWAgailglatIER'ERgUilq.UHM*M„>,n11MIIIM -r- , --I- , • 1 . ,, „ t7-ingt.g,4 SHOTS CONT'D aeMaE r m , TaT (Mai Gatmtua "I ie. I iOTRT IcTnt 11731 CCM ta15< CMS 101. MCST MCC { TOTAL INDIVIDUAL TREE SNOT ASSESMFNT LPHASE 1) r,.a wwsr4wnas.IrcmkS•i0ud Mau finue G TOTAL TREE PLOT ASSESNT AREAS (PHASE 1). C. Go Course Oevetopment, LLC 4 Raa=sson Rd NE N 55449 SUMMARY (PHASE I) ill9Eraahte.aw,,.v aw .el�,r M,t. {ngmipiemmwm-__ tmemcrvflx bwemYLad'paeyyims Mumfhx xw uM b+a.+a4 Nawp0oxexssf 0&44SOwMuu3 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Eiino, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 3HH331L Ids rig " . 1 1 322,222Wi:i?2HI'ErigErng'rniiqrn4lEFiiiWilWrfr'261W:21W1215A=“=$0:2W5WW51 1 ! Uniii11§ i ! 1 111111111M1111111111tHilfl n., 11)111011111111flialliittilllifilltiliolomplill ii433AYM 1 I !.W0t*.0100111/00 1"!011 5;3;.MLn “:"?'fl..110.1 1!!86,-, Z11111CIAftg 4.91 HfMnII:iy.MAHMgipISMAHRVORppg5AEIO VItIVAInAHIM11,115.2 s iliM1111111,1111111til.11111 „ .11111111111111111iiiiin "" --".i " HIM' J111,1 1111.1.011:v imlilinmiiiiiiminuniiimpliDffiiiliviiiiiii.o.miii/A Ao?/ E,a•A. "i;i1-13ild 111111M1M111111filininiP3MintliMitillifilitill I . I 1 „ lisin 4' '1' AlINAIS402KiSkik2222i' i2Akii 1422i2322WA2E3222223 A: 1s2a a as as ai 2ii g #iitid'IgRgEm;R;gr.:;PIE:2.,414:Ed.:2=Arg'gsg,"d'ijdF..2.,,,,,7,F, JltlAt allA111A x13-01I*114,f„141111111fa gv,t4Atf,Ift13Aggl2Mglig-,1,ANt.1,1gtglliflt , . 242SE4EriESEES@i$EIEBE EilEISEIEF a g ddl 611111;111:114131ifi/111/ IMCIM11111;1 3;3143:3133:103:33 t3.1. t I EiElE1F-1EiiEW TIR ',111312Faip AW;a2Zr:.4,4,11.triPRA 'Iliil rilli4-1331141 Cr. 11W "td-'5 1 3'di;i11M10;1qViliI '12W2HI7010;IMVdil2dW 11111114;111d1111 "4 "111114M111111111111h1"" SALM - 11 1;i11111ftlj1041g4g01334AllnIAl't1114-4414"."1g 11113114140:1Wel, 1 I 1- 9 5 999 91999195t 3 !I- dd:d d d ,“dd”,dddFd..i 2 I odd d d".:gl'UlUW-E/WilWIES5EF$Ed,H1'5EPP,EE1.,,rFSUFESEE“EdW.WEEUEi5FFi40:4EU:WEdW,Wdlid,ddIE$51 Irtrrtrd.--" j.PL2 gd 411Ellii11,101" 'g d6 &Ag 3 i IFFId , Iii,lit7:;;,.:114:ZA".=A4tAZ;101“.gCL:%:!tgl.......irT,SigrgIgZE.".4G4gV4%rIttIR,r74;",;4Arltg,t]2*, h4! -Uni11411242244fflianiipahltiffl 11411'3311'15 ';j1111'fiiIIIE1,1111w4wimi zoz...14,34- 24EZEURIE2E2AElEplEEEE6:EEEditE MEE,FdWEIEkIlE/f.,EU 1111"g1""1.Efl3igliliil 61,6 ,;•;“,4.4;;;;;3;r-4;;;:w;;;;311,w-i=s,5“ ww=s;:4;:;;,m;,;,:m•z;;;,•tiiw“,-m-r. it!!3 1111111111,11 It / !II 4111111111111111111141111'1110.111111111.dilflilli!,i 222.122222ii-iffi- 2, 21222224224422122. 21 224 -.2 24 ,2222 22 e. 1111111111111 'I MI 1111111111111MIMPAPP*11401110111L1 IWtHlity-mn-wm.mnininlyummn“.1-w,“-m,““ti,p;in, 1 fli;e.f,E$41,M5.”5.f.WILT.;.411—f.411,5W.Wi$ Hu 0011141MM li1;;;A:Fmni;,2 ilg 11 w 1!3.0!li111/3.313; a . -s ---11111111,01,1110 11.01001,1111111114 VI A: ' ;;;*'!;;;;;;;11;Z;;;;;t;;I;;:;;;;;;;;;;; 0 4g; E VI I 1 - z Inn z .. ;;;;;;;11,13,.m;;;;Ittimlim 1, it- ill: ii i i nm; tilipti , 1 41,151511g3gg.:1';;11115'P'1":ri"...qgnz':3-i3"31;1' XHW.rc%0 11 ii0;;UR3 1 , 1illtii011111,,-.5-.5:iWillii4f4 _ • 'et kar.exca,..,,rest.uw.wxMarqxxsax.,xn...n I x,"clt..xx. J r Ilif 0111111111,0 1 i m iii;;;4;';;;;1;;;;;i;;;i;;;;;;;;;ON.i.;;i;;;;;;;;;2i;;;;;;;;;;WAlii.i;;;;;I;ii;;;;;';;1:;;1 - 1 . 1 •gryjmnvgix4-oviw•On gIllifillIllgjIWIliffif • 10101?,4311littlAittf1ll4 111n;yia5I1 1111 1 11111111 A '11 ;•;.5 5 A ^ ! L r -111 1. 11111111t1111111101111111 1111111111i0)h 1111114414;1114 aaa 1 i 115515 15 AAiAalsaaa,t,0alza a aetl a 11;7".• ;saa;aa.s.;:;;;;;;aa;R;;;,;=.2;=;•saa;17:;57,.;;i1s;gala;"Maaaaaa;;;;aal. 55MiN3iii32-2.iiI6333/1PliiiirninffiliniliNWHIMHOMPII 11 811.111AgIliTIg-4 fliglif311SW,1411331211111111111111113 11111:0' 51; 151 1111i55 51.q,;" 551i15i1 .1! 41 • similssmssussAsms 111111F/iiiii; *MS 1131f11W11 , 1 2 • .....„ tlk 4 4 +tl 4 4 4 ++4 4 4 tlr 4 +3 414 ...AA 41 A .r .17 awamaaaaaaaaawa,ar 4 4 ,+++,* +4 a Aviv.. +File rp 4 If 4 414 4 lit1n=111:711T1:1-1-12,,:4:11117.411115.11:11.11,1.44111.14.11e1,11,1Nii11T11M111111mt11111 unnnn `.141 11. j/1211:1111/Riiii111411iii1;131“311;11111I!111114.121$11: X f ,11-.14ifIEEMEErikgtf444,:::EEEEEOit/tiftittffi44.ti! - lcoacoto.,aga,A 11 WILM1111:911gglhAIA,1§11,glwillimmillmmdvit§111Ria 1 ,W51,1,1“flUi.',W,$55U;i5f,Will,fill$i!EWM115“,i-U,5“,;E$S57,“1.11.!i417$4,51,54,5,51;iEflR,11,1,11,1:.;1 -H 1 1 1 11 111IcAmism -Hs.! 4'W,..1,1..v1,1g3.'11.11,11:111TIE1MIU:11117,1411s4, ittt Pim1111 5 1,1 1lM1111114,11I11A11111.1 -11111111/111111 nADOOM:013 1.1.1i14:i1,14..ti471411T1z111,15 1111011 11 11111115 HU. fliflfl d :DOM 011E volt11111 .1111allT!! 1 MEI N11i4"" 11111.1iliMp1M"'!“"N=,541,'r-111141! ! 3.01i Itliq 11111i10)1111110011110101 V' Will g T"AXA Ai fig111141'1101qr% 1311E11 1,1h 35130 A 22212:295.7.'3,9- 5 511.1 • ! ! - ffilraiiillffitAtilligl‘c0;333 - ''' gira-iitsolil 1'111'1 01 !"ti litli: '11:' IP t.1,4" 1: „ , 11MEOPU 151,5z , 1.!!--1 •,! 11! 11 .111111f111iliplillillilliritmililllil.fimill !11111 illq CI Q J"W13'1''/IIAM4i ihniniliiilijii_JMitiiill_ill qiiiIMiiii3011111:11;h1iliffiltbr 1 jilfliiiiilnillaillijiliilliiiiiiiiliiiininilliiilliMplijil3AWillnliliNItliThAin3 - '-'"17.,"';'-;:.3137:4!!7:4,:f!'.=!'",';'"•?.':;:;”47.;g.=-;,5`A;.1,15.1'" '',!'-'-'q7-7.11'.12M-11 , I , ,'i'l/i111;e551110ii242LITflifl21311133,11ellqPIJ7ITAIWPM1!1101,7;U1tifill - '/3"!. -0M1,1341141i13t31131TIllnillg111,111g .1,11g1114w.l.'.Ager,1,,I.,,,.v.--,i' .1g.-!/!„!,, ;E!EHJ-1,111051inS,W44:11:WPW4HPNWMifft,W5Ftgiffit U6.45-iMiloi.1AF,Iii1E111 FUTURE PHASES INDT171121IAL SHOTS CONTJ ,,„'..73 Itawmo _ _km,t, em lib. 1,1 al Sante. err,. tl• cep 1'1'11 Del ten Orl rep 15. 1.1 Od1, . 13,71 KM., ff,A, ,irn 1:1 Mir L.4 77,77 77,07 ,20557 .1 . 117. 1.55 Suo .7. 0.1 1.75* „ 1..7 15. -70.1- ' 0.774 I. JOOS7 OA ma ot-4 AU, rerl 774 MN 10504 0..1 7.41 1.5 Atm ma a I 1.1 Oak too 1 Odd, 071 od 2;,, I Meer Wt. Sibertre ?E._ Coo... 7.7.7 „IOU} ....Pre ti: terifeeng. WK... tomt ...mom 93 .077777 MO 7. .707. 1 C.177777 Po. ruirese , 3.141 &rite...a :am Amoroso ! ir.1 efreeror peer re, Mir i legr 3 ik,„ Argimar II re 7,7777.77117777 Tn 7 707.41 17171S J717717.71 Apt , 07717e417, „ Yes tie.r: 1., Tap r re.. treble' eetear. tete 1....2131420r4 Or en.. etre,. Er031,5.11134e,rder 7777. 077,07777779.117177 5.7.07 Hord torereart .„. Crerete.m. Tr. entrierari re, ern .4rieters.,9 Yes „ea ..1.1.ret reed.. Vert ,tiserrore T777 I 77,77717777777,777747717. 177 070.7010.7. 777 0.1.7 Vo 0,77-14777777-771777.7.71 4,rtirecrlet rarreebeel COM.. T17777 re. Deriarr.u. Nreirgb. re. C..ektrer. rr dere. 1777 7.7.7 V.7 re. Yet Ve. Vet Vt. bre re, Ye. Yee Vgi Ye. enCarlson 7- McCain NOTE: TREE IDENTIFICATION AND TREE AREA CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDED BY KJOLHAUG ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. re, Et, • TOTAL INDIVIDUAL TREE SHOT ASSESMENT .(ENTIRE SITE) rkoomaamoto matt ma,,,Jotamt Utmost ear... tor IleireerelOrtmterrber Berk... **A tatrar,exhit, 11..11....PreiNcres rain tAtirstrIvert errarr Prate. AO 057.D. Comemn.tree krtegre....alloreflecrr. 1X1 tottmoottomPoommmummoMm 5571 1 TOTAL TREE PLOT ASSESMENT AREAS (ENTIRE SITE1 Om.. Cato TOW.. 17777.7 trtOida 05447 *kw Re..m,n4 717.7771 SWOON 5.40 .1. 70 7.57 Imam stmoommommimamatoom km. im oat too m attima am tam ratom *al Labs 1 7.11 21.5 1 A MOW WO.* Mono ilega *to Mt .00 471711 .11 2441.70 1011 51 13733 005 *CO WO 3400 .401 SUM COO 701440 0(0 tOO oto kottmatO mamma I ' mom Co171 Xi tOO **111 CO) 040 .5 404 4174 OM 51 11. 0-411 1510 007 049 *CO 111.22 1111911. 11711443 177771.1.1.177.7.7117.7 1007086 15551 07.71.77....... 404949 07.1.5.....15711.7 0.7 VS. SUMMARY (ENTIRE SITE) 4044401140011104004114101 1.1..1.5770571 7.77.511711.1.4. 31(47011004401004040011171014 004400443141433440401744704941414 am. amooktommkoom .Ittleirtetnrettrikortrareittrat. 47.77.517.017154171 Oman 7.11.77.71 0417014011041411001l 41..i77114d 14.51915 446414 110.19 10(070 or - motommosmotodoomoot MOM - 6077 4 14490070771TOM. MOO a 0,5 1177000077700407.77001'70147 074043 oode. UMW. efgrIA.11101t eretilV N.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11079 Racksoon Rd NE Maine, MN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake EOLm,MinneSMa TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 25/ of 25 alCarlsan 7' McCain LA V KE ELMO, MINNESOTA \ \\<„. \ • \ „ .7.2=Ssosios ,00 ISSOt000Soor.s.---4-o.- ° sits wr o w- \ OVo le/ el H.C. Goff Course Development, LLC t 1074 Rad_Mri Rd Ng Wone. MN 55.49 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, ronno5ora RKS $1 luara)- v. a cm mmoo Niok- eek Tka'af 1:0.4% {IWO HO. KR.E.00041 Nnow what's below. Call before you dig. EXHIBIT F PHASING PLAN- DEVELOPMENT .„ , „.....„. „ XHIBIT NG °;,kee.S...4V-gka-keese,Ye-tpeetkest ek-Weege ese.eseets, e°°°, „Sees- TI NNESOTA ient-MennoMes KG, Golf Course Deveopment LLC 11074 tiarl,sson fl Staine, MN 5544g \ THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Eono, Minnesota to°1° Mee. kn.... it. Wee MO. Mee Ittken pet. On/eV:Moe MO Know ....hark below. Call ['Wore you dig, EXHIBIT F PHASING PLAN -UTILITY t74 KE ELMO, MINNESOTA H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 11074 Rachsson RO NE Lai, Elmo, Knne5nta one, MN 50149 flENCHMARK MIL-27.1:ZSl OZ w wn.r. below, Call below you dig. EXHIBIT G PHASING PLAN - GRADING P3 - 0? / 3 � ,�� �~� ��� � �_����U K �u THE77������*���,U ��*�UU����KU o�_~ m��� ��_r�� "��~�� Pn2liOlin8p/ PUD/Pl8t February 1[\2O17 Background Tartan Pod, 3M's private I7'ho|e golf course and recreational facility was purchased by H.C. Golf Course Development, LL[inMarch VfZUI6. Since that time, the golf course reconstruction and proposed clubhouse renovation have begun with an expected opening Summer of20l7. HI.Golf applied for aComprehensive Plan Amendment nnSeptember l2, 2016. This application was approved, conditioned on Metropolitan Council approval, January 9, 2017. The EAW for the Royal Golf Club was approved by the City Council on January 17, 2017 and the Zoning Text Amendment for the new Golf Course Community designation was approved nnFebruary 7m,2817. The applicant has prepared a5hore|andPUD/C|uster evaluation that isinthe final stages ofreview bythe City ofLake Elmo. QnSeptember 0,2U16, H.C. Golf requested that the City undertake a Water Supply study based on the City Engineer's recommendation during the Concept Plan review. The study iscomplete, the recommended changes toRGC'swater looping system have been made. RG[has obtained its required Wetland Alteration Permits and received approval ofthe Wetland Replacement Plan. This narrative accompanies the Development Stage Planned Unit Development and Preliminary Plat, RGC and City Staff have been working on the details of the preliminary plat over the last 3 months. During this effort, the concerns raised during the concept review, the EAW, the GCC Zoning Text Amendment, and public comments have been addressed and incorporated into this submission. 11455 701h Street North Lake E|01O, Minnesota 55047 | || }� VVVV\�.FOVa.C]0-[-'Uu��nI{)01 , � Substantive Changes Since Sketch Plan Review There have been many changes since the Planning Commission saw the original sketch plan. The substantive changes area: l. Provision ufanaccess tothe south connecting the neighborhood to1O* Street. : 2. Provision of public trail connecting 1Om Street to Z(Y Street. 3. Elimination of any cul-de-sacs longer than City Ordinance. 4. Addition of an access from2O`o Street to the east part of the site 5. Elimination of 11 lots in the area east of Homestead and north of Tartan Meadows. 6. Connection ofthe NVVneighborhood tothe west -central neighborhood. 7. Removal of the 19 lots that had been planned on a wooded ridge along Lake Elmo Ave. RG[isrequesting various types of flexibility based nnits PUDdesignation. These requests are listed below and detailed ineach category throughout the narrative. These requests are: l. The golf course iurequired 6wordinance tohave two entrances. When submitting the grading permit for the course, this was unknown toRG[. Asaresult, the area where the Zu » access once existed was used asthe rennediationarea where the mercury contaminated soils inthe golf course greens was placed. Tnaddress the access concern, RCG is proposing to modify the main entrance drive to include a drive with a median at the intersection of2{Yh Street. Z. Minimum Lot Size. The minimum lot size in the G[[is9,OOOsquare feet. Many ofthe proposed Villa lots are below this requirement. Typically, an Association maintained unit would bemore aLDRorMDR housing style; the smaller lot size would be compensated bycommon open space. VVnbelieve vvehave done this with our proposal and should beapproved. |fnot allowed, the only way Lomeet the minimum density vvou|6 be to make all the lots closer tnthe minimum. We believe this would be detrimental tothe neighborhood and itexclusivity. 3. Impervious Surface Area (Per lot). While w/earen't exactly sure atthis point because we haven't picked our builders, we suspect that on some of the 55' villa lots we might exceed the ]0%impervious coverage requirement, Like #2above, the villa would typically beaLDR/K4DR product with a40%coverage requirement. VVebelieve itisreasonable toask this ofour villa product aswell. VVewill adhere tothe Shm,e|andOrdnance inthe areas covered bythe Shoreland District. We are not requesting this flexibility for the Traditional Single Family. 4. Villa Setbacks. RG[isrequesting aIQ'front yard setback when aside-loaded garage is used. In this case, there should be no issue with parking cars in the driveway that will overhang the sidewalk orROW. This isnot anuncommon allowance when utilizing a side'|oadgaraQe. Additionally, vvcare requesting 7.5'/7.S'sidpyardsetback (garage or living area) for the villas. With the ordinance requirement Vfl0'/S'therewill be instances where wvewill have garages with 1O'ofeach other. VVebelieve this creates an ugly street view. S. We vxmu|d like "trails" in front yards to be 6/ wide. This argument is made in the Trails section. 6. ROW width. In the 55'vvidevi||a area on the east side we are proposing a SO/ ROW without sidewalks. This is described in the streets section. 7' Number of"Entrance Monunnents°. City ordinance allows for only Zentrance monuments per development. VVeare requesting 4entrance features — one atthe intersection ofStreet Aand 20m Street, one atthe clubhouse entrance, one ntthe entrance on Lake Elmo Ave. and another approximately 600' north of our entrance on 101h Street. |naddition, xvewould like tohave upto6additional "neighborhood identifiers" used toidentify the villa enclaves. There would likely benothing more than aZ'X2'pillar with the RG[Logo and the name ofthe neighborhood. 8, Sidewalks. We are proposing two snna|| areas where we think sidewalk is not warranted. This is explained inthe Sidewalk section. 9. Garages. The ordinance states that there isalUO0square foot maximum for an attached garage without aconditional use permit. |twill not baa1all uncommon for many ofthese homes tohave 4'cargarages, especially ifthey have golf carts. We would like the flexibility to have a larger garage with a much more expedient review than a [UP, or have e PUD condition that states that there can only be the equivalent of single stall garage doors facing the street. VVeare still bound bythe percentage of garage face tohouse face requirement. Proposed Land Uses and Densities Land Uses. The development contemplates detached, single family homes encompassing abroad range oflifestyles choices and price points. Anticipated homes will range from Association maintained villa products to high -end custom homes. The "viUa"product has 5different "nei#hhorhoods"-3onthe west side nfthe golf course and Zonthe east. |tislikely that the neighborhood inthe Southwest corner ofthe site may contain a product for "new families on the go" that will be a two-story product but still Association maintained. This isanemerging buyer segment asMi|iennia|sstart to form families and switch to owning their own home. Lot Sizes. Traditional single family lots—These|otswiUenge from 07-100'inwidth with minimum depths between l30/to1S[Y. The varied lots are intermixed throughout the development depending on proximity to the golf course and orientation to existing natural features. Front setbacks for traditional single family homes will be 30' as well as the street'nidesetback for acorner lot. The rear setback is3O' Golf course lots will beaminimum of1Q8'wide. The rear setback will be3O'and side setbacks atproposed tobc15'each side (3[ybetween hnnnes). Internally, RG[may grant variances Lothe sideyardsetback tnallow for bunnp'Vuts, egress windows, wide eaves and the like. These would begranted only onacase bycase basis toallow for unusual architectural elements. In nocase, will the setback beless than 10' No encroachments into utility easements will be allowed. There are 79 Golf Course lots; the average lot area l7,DOOsquare feet, Off -course lots with 8O-9K] widths will have the same front and rear setbacks but have 10' sideyard setbacks. Typical City -allowed encroachments into setbacks will be allowed but in no instance will encroachments into utility easements be allowed. There are 88 off -course lots. The 90'+lots have anaverage size ofl5,6UOsquare feet; the average area for aQO'+lots is13,7l]square feet. Association Maintained Villa Lots —Therc are essentially two different villa lots —SS' wide and GS'wide. These will belocated nnpublic streets in5different enclaves or pods. As negotiations are completed with the two or three custom builders for these homes, plans will bebrought forward for City review. Generally, the homes will he l800—IO00square feet nnthe main level. All units will have full basements. The front setback is proposed to be 20' for side -load garage units and 25' for front loaded garages. The proposed side setbacks are 7.5'from each side /l5'between honned. The lot areas for the 55' lot range from 6900 square feet to 14,700 square feet, averaging approximately O,7OOsquare feet. The lots areas for the 6S'lots range from 7,8OOtol3,lOOsquare feet. The average square footage is9,QOOsquare feet. The various setback/ROW/Sidewalk relationships that are formed as part of the request are shown on Exhibits A, B, C, and D. 0ensitV' The current plan indicates atotal ofZ92units onZ3l.2Sgross residential acres, UsingtheCity'snnethodsofnetdnOVutrights'of-way,b|uMs,vvedandsandthe like e net residential area of 186.92 acres is arrived at. This creates e net density of 1.56 units per acre. This iswithin the density range prescribed bythe Golf Course Development Area 231.2449 lCthStreet I.88 Lake Elmo Avenue 2.82 Wetlands 19J1 Wetland Buffers 9,81 Open Water (area ofEasement) 1.61 Open Space Trail Easement (Oudots B and Out|mtT) 6.66 Bluff 0.85 F|oodway 0.00 Net Residential Area 186.92 ToCa|Lots 292 Net Density 1.56 Streets/Sidewalks. Streets are generally designed tobe28'feet (back ofcurb toback of curb) within a 60/ right-of-way. All streets have sidewalks on one side except for the SS'villa product onthe east side ofthe neighborhood and the 6O'6S'villa product inthe 5\Ncorner. Both "pods"orenclaves contain fewer than 2Olots, and are situated in locations that won't experience through traffic. Both enclaves have avery short walk to a street with a sidewalk or trail. Some lots have access to a trail in their backyard. In only one east neighborhood (55' lots), due to the east/west dimension from the golf course to the east property line, the ROW had to be reduced to 50' to help increase the buffer and preserve trees on the property edge, Parks, Trails and Open Spaces. Trails. In response to the Comprehensive Park Plan fora trail along 2011 Street from the clubhouse access to Lake Emo Ave,, we have proposed an off-street trail from the easterly most proposed street (Street A)toStreet ], where the trail moves away from the street and proceeds through the golf course, neighborhood and other planned open spaces eventually connecting to lOth Street. This is proposed to be credited against the pr 'ect's park dedication fee. No other public parkland dedication is proposed. Due to severe topography and trees, it was not possible to construct an off-street trail from the proposed trail intersection with Street Etowhere it leaves Street Dat the NVVcorner Vfthe Homestead neighborhood. Because Kisnot preferable t0 construct asphalt trails along the fronts of lots, an 8' sidewalk was discussed. RG[ would prefer to see any sidewalk in a front yard no greater than 6'. While a tree should still be able togrow ina7'green space /bou|evard\between the curb and the edge of an 8' sidewalk, an 8' wide piece of concrete looks out of scale with the other elements inthe front yard. RGC(srequesting that the "troi|°inthe area described be limited to 6'. Private Amenities. A private park is proposed in the SW corner ofthe site as a snnoU neighborhood amenity. There i»also oprivate HUAmaintained fitness center and swimming pool proposed in the golf clubhouse area on the west side of parking lot. The exact location and design have yet to be determined but will be proposed during the CUP process. Use Vfthe fitness center and pool will bepaid for through HUA dues. There are also nearly 2 miles of HOA owned nature/exercise trails that exist in the northwest corner ofthe site (Out|otDD). These are not designed for bicycles or other like asthere are numerous bridges, stairways and steep slopes. They are intended to provide a means to experience the hilly woodland and get a more energetic experience than anormal sidewalk nrtrail. Private Open Spaces. All HOAowned/maintained open spaces will beencumbered by some form of conservation easement to satisfy both DNR and City Ordinance requirements. The specifics ofthese easements are being worked onwith Staff. There are 35 different out|otswithin the proposed plat; the ownership and maintenance responsibilities of the outlots are shown on Page 8 of the plan set. Golf Cart Friendly Neighborhood. It isvery important toRG[that the neighborhood begolf cart friendly. 8vthis, xvemean that golf carts would bepermitted onthe internal public streets and the off-street trails that connect the neighborhood to the clubhouse. Golf carts would not beallowed onsidewalks, streets surrounding the property, or trails that did not link directly to the clubhouse. Ordinances to this affect are common (slow moving vehicle) and essentially center around the driver (must benflegal driving age with insurance, etc.)and the cart itself. |fthe ordinance isadawn tndusk ordinance certain accessories must bemnthe cart; if it includes dusk todawn operation additional accessories are required. RGCwould like to explore this concept with Lake Elmo Public Safety officials to arrive at an ordinance that satisfies all. Restrictive Covenants. The development will be encumbered by a variety of Restrictive Covenants put in place for the benefit of the residents (Architectural Guidelines, use restrictions, exterior storage requirements, vehicle parking, RVs, etc.} as well as Restrictive Covenants placed on open spaces at the direction of the City as part of the Ordinance and Shoreland requirements. As part of the review process, we expect that the agency required covenants will be developed and that concerns of the Planning Commission will bevoiced and incorporated into the HOADocuments. Finalization of these documents will bedone prior toFinal Plat submittal Transportation. All the access points tosurrounding streets and County Roads have been approved by the appropriate agencies subject to the final design being presented. During the EA\N approval process, a traffic study was performed. All the recommendations of the study have been implemented in the plans, the most significant of which are turn lanes at allthe project intersections with 201h 5tnaeL The access to 10th Street has been obtained through negotiation the property owner to the east ofthe access point, Terry Emerson. The negotiation involves land swaps and other considerations xvewish tnremain outside the public domain. The discussions are proceeding nicely and vveare inthe process ofreviewing final documents. The land swaps will be accomplished prior to final plat approval so that everything will be memorialized inthe plat. The specifics nrthe land swaps will bepresented atthe Planning Commission meeting. Tree Preservation Trees were inventoried using two methods. Many trees were individually identified and located. Some trees were inventoried using aforesters sampling method. The individual tree locations as well as the forester's areas are shown on the submitted tree preservation plan. Individual trees were identified by 0o|haug Environmental Services and Tree Biz. The foresters sample areas were done byK]o|haugEnvironmental Services. Carlson McCain surveyed the individual tree locations. The detailed calculations can befound onthe submitted tree preservation plan. There is mitigation requirement nf4,Z88 caliper inches. This mitigation requirement isfulfilled onthe submitted landscape plans. It should be noted that our calculations are made utilizing the "mixed use" provisions in the City Ordinance. |nour opinion, the public nature ofthe golf course, restaurant, banquet and event facilities, driving range, and teaching center all indicate a use that is commercial in nature and that any financial link between the residential uses and the golf course does not invalidate this provision. VVeare confident that the combination ofsaving over 60%oftrees onsite eswell asall the proposed landscaping and amenity features, The Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo will become abeautiful new addition tothe City that everyone can b2proud of. Phasing The first phase of development will be the development of the east side of the project along with asmall portion inthe 5VVcorner. This isshown VnExhibit Eofthis narrative. All the first phase utilities will be contained in Phase 1 Development except for a sewer force main along 1010 Street and its intersection with Lake Elmo Ave. and avvatennain along the south side ofZOpn Street to its intersection with Lake Elmo Blvd (Exhibit FL The Grading Phasing isshown onExhibit G. The primary driver ofthis phasing isthe need to provide public sewer and water to the clubhouse within 2 years of it's opening, which isexpected tobethe summer of2Ol7. The ultimate pace ofthe phasing will be determined by market demand but future phases are generally expected to proceed from the SVVcorner north to2O*Street. Phasing ofcritical public infrastructure and trail improvements will be discussed and approved with Staff as we proceed with approvals. The approximate dates of the 4 development phases are: Phase 1-2O17 Phase 2-2Ol9 Phase S-2O31 Phase 4-2015 Builders. While we have spoken with many custom builders in the area, out of respect for the City approval process vvehave not selected any. With preliminary plat approval, we will announce these builders and, if needed, make a presentation of their work to the City. VVeare confident that the City will be pleased with the custom builders we will chose. Presently vveare considering apool of7custom builders for the traditional homes and I'3custom home builders for the villas, There will be an architectural review committee (ARC) that will approve all house plans in accordance with a prescribed set ofarchitectural guidelines that will cover minimum roof pitches and materials, 4-sided architecture, wrapped windows and doors, Hardie siding and Andersen Windows. Asvvecontinue toput together the builder pool, vvewill be happy to review the architectural guidelines and speak with the builders themselves. Summary The Royal Golf Club is a unique solution to the natural and regulatory challenges that this site presents. Its proximity to transportation and the rest of the metro area, the surrounding open space and recreational areas, quality schools and a broad buyer profile offer a unique locational advantage. Combined with the golf course, there has not been aproject ofthisca|ibcrinthe Twin Cities in two decades; there likely will not be another one in the foreseeable future, We believe that this plan is a solid framework with which to proceed to final plat and the other regulatory steps tobring the neighborhood tnreality. VVecontinue tndiscuss the project vv)th policy makers, refine the plan as we gain more information on the potential market, evolving advancing the proposal and addressing more details of the design as we prepare for final PUD and plat approvals. Respectfully submitted, H.C.Golf Course Development, LLC Rick Packer President (IN FEET) TlieKo a If Club at La 0 Tke Ko,yal Coif Club at 10 20 40 (IN FEET) 0 a EXHIBIT B (.4 C Golf Coarse c-tvlopment, ThyK.09a1 Golf Club at L 110 6 736-6. - 0 v") N i l i- o o -i 6 6 .-II- , (-4 EXHIBIT C LIC 6011COUrse eveiorment, LLC Tke KoaI GolfClub 0 10 20 40 _ - - _r,z= EXHIBIT D — 40.0 0 C GoU- CourseCour5e 1Iveoprnent, L ASI T AKE ELMO, MINNESOTA H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Nadtsson ed NE &Moe, 140 55440 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, elmeekota `.° EXHIBIT E Kn. whip. below, - Call before yoe P1/ EXHIBIT F HAS NG LAN TIL NNESOTA 7919.91177199,t.n.„71.9.7.99999-79n7,499 nr • :ono— 90' 10,5097E- 7,7 WC, Gof Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 11079 Flannoson Ed FM cake Elmo, nlmnasom Blaine, 054 55449 ................ „ !"—BENCHMARKS ., ..., . " re& "Vn51 514 nr.no449905"‘ to.. - no m (onm am 10 Wan coo on. noom rnrr".79:tra;171::::r" Kn. OW. below. Call Wore you 0 OfdiacElsz ooe • - - votevoor le,..144. t-v., • XHIBIT N 0, MINN H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radisson Rd ME Met 54449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Eirnid Minnesota riENC 'ARKS orom ado Ta a Oat. Ca. gtaglia 0.4.64 temo g 10,1%0 CUD SW. Waft CAL Na.011,4001 EXHIBIT G Kt., vibes below. Call Ware you 4:0, P3 / al / 3 3/8/2017 FOCUS Engineering, Inc. Mail - Royal Golf Club Preliminary Plat/Plans 6- Royal Golf Club Preliminary Plat/Plans 1 message Jack Griffin <jack.griffin@focusengineeringinc.com> To: Stephen Wensman <SVVensman@lakeelmo.org> Cc: Chad Isakson <Chad.lsakson@focusengineeringinc.com> Jack Griffin lack.griffin@focusengineeringinc.com> Wed, Mar 8, 2017 at 2:16 PM Stephen, Please see the attached engineering review comments for the Royal Golf Club Preliminary Plat/Plans. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks —Jack John (Jack) W. Griffin, RE. Principal / Sr. Municipal Engineer F CUS ENGINEERING, INC, 651.300.4264 jack.griffin@focusengineeringinc.com 2017-03-08 RGC-Preliminary Plan Review.pdf 1505K https://mail,google.com/mail/u/0/?ui=28,ik=885060bd59&yiew=pt&search=sent&th=15aat9Oec913eabd&sim1=15aaf9Oec913eabd 1/1 H�������8�F�Uo� '°'^-'"'~�^���'"^^^^'"/ Date: March 8, 2017 To: Stephen VVensman,Planning Director [c: Emily Becker, City Planner From: Jack Griffin, P.E,City Engineer ENGINEERING, inc. CamGeheren, P.E. Jack Griffin, P.E. nyanStempski, P.E. Chad |sak,on.P.E. Re: Royal Golf Club atLake Elmo PUD Preliminary Plan Engineering Review An engineering review has been completed for the Preliminary Plan submittal for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo PUD. The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by Carlson -McCain: * Royal Golf Club atLake Elmo PUDPreliminary Plan Set, Sheets 1'65`dated February Z8,201l ° Preliminary Phasing Plans, Sheets PI'Pldated February ZO,2OI7. ° Lift Station Site Plans, dated February 28,ZU17. w Stu/musterManagement Plan dated February ZO,ZOl7. * Storm sewer design calculations dated February 28,2Ol7. * Landscape and Tree Preservation Plans were not reviewed byEngineering. STATUS/FINDINGS: Engineering has prepared the following review comments: All public improvements constructed to support the development must be designed and constructed in accordance with the City Engineering Design Standards Manual available onthe [bvwebsite. PRELIMINARY PLAT ° Outlots B and T include City trails and should be dedicated to the City as part of the Plat. City ownership has been correctly identified onthe Preliminary Plat Index Sheet. * Oudots E, H, M, N'\(VV'AA, EE, GG, and HHinclude storm water ponds, infiltration basins' sanitary lift stations and utility corridors that must be dedicated to the City as part of the Plat. City ownership has been correctly identified onthe Preliminary Plat Index Sheet. � Drainage and Utility easements must be granted over all of Outlots G, 0, Q, Z, and 11, and portions of Outlot FF as part of the [it/s Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System to protect the various wetlands, *mdmnd buffers and drainage systems. These 0uUotswill be HUAovvned and maintained, These easements have been correctly identified on the Preliminary Plat. � Outlots M, N and EE do not appear to be adequate for City owned/maintained lift stations. Preliminary Plat approval should be contingent upon expanding Outlots M, N, and EE, or otherwise revising the Preliminary P|at/P|anstn the Ot/s satisfaction such that the proposed sanitary lift station sites are acceptable to the [ityslift station consulting engineer and Public Works staff. |tisrecommended that the Cityslift station consultant should complete preliminary site designs for each lift station for the applicant to incorporate into the Preliminary P|at/P|ans.The lift station sites require improved on*itegrades' better access and PAGE 1 of 5 turnaround areas for daily maintenance routines, betteron'she screening and greater separation from other utilities. * All emergency overflow elevations must be fully protected bydrainage easement. * Drainage and utility easements are required over all storm sewer, sanitarysewerand watermainnot located on OtyOudots and right-of-way, minimum 30-feet in width, 15 feet from centerline on each side of pipe. Easements must be shown on the Preliminary Plat, Utility Plans and Grading Plans. Easements have generally been provided as required. Revisions may be necessary has the plans are finalized or additional width may be required to adjust for greater pipe depths. • VVrh1pn landowner permission must be submitted as part of the development applications for any storm water discharges to adjacent properties to avoid negative impacts to downstream properties. TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENTS * ZCY"5treetNurthdedica1edhght'of-way.Asrequined,thePne|iminaryP|atde6icateu4Ofeetofh8ht-nf~way to the City of Lake Elmo along the entire length ufJ8th Street North to provide a minimum R/VVfrom the existing roadway centerline. p Manning Trail North dedicated right-of-way. As required, the Preliminary Plat dedicates 5U'55feet ofright' of-woytothe[ityofLakeBmoo|ong the length ofManning Trail North within the City limits ofLake Elmo toprovide aminimum R/VVfrom the existing roadway centerline. 0 Washington [ountvded|cated right'of-waY.The Plat must dedicate sufficient right'of-wayalong [SAH 17 (Lake Elmo Avenue) and CSAH 10 (10th Street North) as may be required by Washington County. Preliminary Plat approval must be contingent upon the proposed right-of-way along CSAH 17 (Lake Elmo Avenue) and [SAH 10(1UthStreet North) being reviewed and approved byWashington County. 0 Access Management Access to the development is proposed in seven locations accessing [SAH 17 (Lake Elmo Avenue), CSAH 10 (10th Street North), 20th Street North (MSA collector street) in four locations, and Manning Trail North. Preliminary Plat approval must be contingent upon the City receiving written correspondence from Washington County approving the proposed access locations at CSAH 17 and CSAH 10, Street [ access to ZOth Street North (PWSACollector Street). Access is 550feet east of Lake Elmo Avenue vs. the required spacing ofG6Ofeet, Proposed access location aligns with the existing intersection for 20th Street Court N. and should cause no operational concerns. � Street] access to 20th Street North (K8SACollector Stneet). Proposed access is located 365feet offset from the existing intersection of Legion Avenue. The preferred access point would align with the existing intersection for Legion Avenue, however the applicant has indicated site conditions at the golf course prohibiting this connection. The offset has been reviewed by the Oty's transportation consultant and no concerns were identified with this location. Golf Course Entrance. The existing entrance to the golf course from ZOth Street North will be maintained as part of the development. No secondary access to the Gn|f[ouoe/Ouh House has been proposed. � Street A access to 20th Street North (MSA Collector Street). Access is 650 feet west of Manning Trail North. The location has been reviewed in the field and is an acceptable access location to 20th Street North. Street 8 access to Manning Trail North. Access is 550feet south ofZ0th Street North. The location has been reviewed in the field and is an acceptable access location to Manning Trail North. m Washington [ountv|otenection Improvements. Preliminary Plat approval must be contingent upon the developer constructing as part of the development project and at its sole cost all intersection improvements recommended by Washington County. The preliminary plans show right and left turn lanes in each of these intersections. 0 [itvStneet Intersection Improvements. The [itv'x transportation consultant, SKF Consulting, reviewed the transportation studies completed bythe developer's consultant, includingthe Traffic Impact Study and Turn Lane Evaluation Report, and has identified the need for right turn lanes ateach ofthe access locations along 20th Street North, including the Golf Course entrance and including at the intersection ofManning Trail North. No turn lanes are required at the Manning Trail intersection with Street B. Preliminary Plat approval must therefore be contingent upon the developer constructing as part of the project and at its sole cost right turn lanes meeting City state mid design standards at Streets E, ], /\ the Golf Course entrance, and Manning Trail. The preliminary plans show right turn lanes ineach mfthese locations asrequired. RESIDENTIAL STREETS ° The Preliminary Plat/Plans have addressed staff concerns regarding secondary access and street interconnections. • All streets are proposed to be pub|icaUyowned and maintained. Public streets must bedesigned to meet the [ity's Engineering Design Standards including R/VVwidth (60'fe*t)' street width (28-feed and cu|'de' smcradii(G0foctnadiusR/VV/4Sfootmdiuspavement),exceptasnctedhene|n. • Surmountable concrete curb and gutter shall be installed in single family residential areas with future driveways and B618 curb installed along entrance roadways and roadway stretches with no lots/driveways. ° Minimum street width for one-way divided streets is 19feeC * Street intersections must be at 90 degrees and maintain 50 feet of tangent with maximum slopes ofZ.5Y6. * The City standard minimum horizontal curve radius is90. ° Maximum longitudinal grade is 8% with no sidewalks, 6Y6where there are sidewalks. * Six (6) foot sidewalks must he provided along all residential streets and as may be required by the [by for connectivity. Sidewalks are not shown along the cul-de-sac of Street A, or along Streets H and K. ° Ten (10) foot utility easements are required on either side of all right-of-ways. ° Exceptions toCity standards being proposed are as follows: � Street [:The applicant is proposing no sidewalk along Street C. With no sidewalk the right-of-way width can be narrowed to SOfeet Street D:The applicant is proposing rural section road with ribbon curb along the southern segment with no lots/driveways. Staff is acceptable to this exception if the revisions outlined below can be accommodated. m Typical Street Sections must be revised on the Preliminary Plans as follows: � All typical sections must show boulevard trees onboth sides ofthe street. Boulevard trees shall be set back feet from bock ofcurb with trai!/sidewa|kand set back feet from back ofcurb without trail/sidewalk, unless otherwise noted below. � When applicable the typical sections should show boulevard trees in the center median areas. � Street C: Boulevard trees shall be set back 8 feet from the back of curb, shown on both sides. � Street U (STA44+SUto l[th Street): Typical sections shall be revised as follows and right-of-way widths adjusted asneeded tocomply with city standards. • The boulevard without trail/sidewalk shall extend Qfeet at496max. grade then transition to4:l)ns|ope.The boulevard tree shall beplaced Sfeet from back nfcurb. • A minimum Z toot shoulder at max. grade of296 most be placed on the outside of the trail/sidewalk prior tothe 4:1 ins|upe. GRADING PLAN, ST0RMWATRMANAGEMENT AND STORM SEWER SYSTEM w The site plan is subject to a storm water management plan meeting State, VBVVD and City rules and regulations. Storm water and storm sewer facilities proposed as part of the site plan to meet State and VBVVD permitting requirements must be constructed in accordance with the [by Engineering Design Standards Manual available onthe City webahe. � Preliminary Plan revisions may benecessary tocomply. • Infiltration basin design must be based on actual soil borings and investigations to determine acceptable design infiltration rates and basin locations. All infiltration basins shall be given a name corresponding to the storm water model and that distinguishes the basin from a wet pond. The 100-year HWL must be shown onthe preliminary plans. � Preliminary Plan revisions may be required to provide adequate infiltration. PAGE 3 of 5 � Label the Outlot M infiltration basin and provide the 100-year HWL on the plans. � Label the Outlot EE and HH infiltration basins and provide the 100-year HWL an the plans. ' All storm water facilities, including infiltration basins, wetlands and wetland buffers, must be placed in Out|ots deeded to the City for maintenance purposes. The Stn/mwa\er Facility [}udots must fully incorporate the 100-year HWL, 10 foot maintenance bench and all maintenance access roads. ' All lots must have the minimum floor elevation at least Zfeet above any adjacent 1OU^yearHVVLand the 100-year HWL shall not encroach onto any lot. When the 100-year, 10-day snow melt condition produces a higher flood elevation than the 100'yearstorm event' the higher flood condition shall be the flood level placed on the plans and used for preliminary plan preparation including building low floor elevations and lot encroachments. �+ The Downs Lake 100-year HWL of 893.8 encroaches Lot 1, Block 3. The low floor elevations for Lots 1-6, Block 3 must be raised to be a minimum of 2 feet higher than the 100-year HWL. � The Downs Lake 100'yearHVVLof893.8 encroaches Lot 1'5. Block 4.The low floor elevations for Lots 2-5, Block 4 must be raised to be a minimum of 2 feet higher than the 100-year HWL. The Wetland-20 100-year HWL of 909.2 continues to encroach Lots 19-20, Block 18. " Pond 6Oon0udotVproposes storm water pond|ngover the existing dual gas pipeline and easement area. It is the City's understanding that this improvement will not be allowed as proposed and if allowed would pose undue maintenance and ownership burden on the City. The plans should he revised to remove this encroachment or the applicant must provide written correspondence to the City from the gas main utility owner stating that the proposed improvements are acceptable as proposed including no ongoing maintenance restrictions tothe City. ° Stormwate,Ponds must be constructed meeting City standards. StormwaterVVet Ponds are required to have a minimum of 3 feet in depth to the NWL, constructed with 3:1 side slopes and both a 10:1 aquatic bench and a 10:1 maintenance bench. Designated maintenance access roads, 20feet in width, must be provided for all storm water facilities with dope no greater than 10Y6. Both the NVVL and lOO'yeor HVVL must beshown onthe plans. The Typical Pond Section shown nnsheet 6lmust bereplaced with the C\ty's Standard Typical Pond Section detail. �- Pond Maintenance access has not been provided toInfiltration Basin ZO. � Pond SO does not appear to be graded to City standards including the 10:1 aquatic bench and a 1O:lmaintenance bench. �^ Pond GO does not appear to begraded to City standards including the 10:1 aquatic bench and n 10:1 maintenance bench. Pond 60 maintenance access must be improved accordingly. � The 100-year HWL must be calculated and placed on the plans for all rear yard catch basin areas. Drainage and utility easements must be revised on the Preliminary Plans to fully protect the localized 100-year HWL. w Overland emergency overflows or outlets will be required as part of the site plan. All emergency overflow elevations must befully protected bydrainage easement. * The drainage swa|ealong the rear yards of Lots 26'38, Block 19 is not protected by easement. The svva|e should be regraded to run closerto the rear lot lines, rather than within 10 feet of the building pads pf Lots Z7and J8. ° The maximum curb run prior to a catch basin is 350 feet. Additional catch basins may be required. ° The storm sewer system shall be designed to maintain the City standard minimum pipe cover of 3 feet. ° Drain tile isrequired as part ofthe City standard street section atall localized low points )nthe street. Drain tile considerations may impact the storm sewer design and depth requirements at low points. MUNICIPAL WATER SUPPLY ~ The Royal Golf Club development area (Tartan Park) was excluded from the 2030Compnehenske Water System Plan, being identified as an area to not be served by municipal water. However, municipal water infrastructure exists immediately adjacent to Tartan Park (16-inch trunk vvatermain line has been constructed along Lake Elmo Avenve). Atthe developer's request, the Otyswater system modeling consultant (AE2S)completed the Tartan Park Water System Study to review and identify the expansion capabilities ofthe water system to service this subdivision including a detailed analysis of the operating pressures, vvatermain pipe sizing and looping requirements. The water system study verified that once the 16'\nch trunkvvatermain connection is installed as part of the Downtown Phase Z Improvements between 3(yh Street and Upper 33mStreet, the water system can be extended to serve the proposed development within Tartan Park without the need for additional infrastructure such as pressure reduction valves or booster stations. Depending on the final development design/layout, localized private booster pumps or pressure reduction valves may be needed for individual structures orcommercial uses. The watermain distribution network and pipe sizing for this development should be constructed as shown in Figure 1 of the AE25 water system study. This watermain network including pipe sizes and looping connections, has been correctly shown in the Preliminary Plans dated February 28, 2017. The developer is responsible to provide the water system infrastructure to support the proposed development. All water system infrastructure must be designed to meet City standards and constructed at the developer's cost. Prior to connection permits being issued any non-residential water users need to be better defined for the City toconfirm service capabilities. MUNICIPAL SANITARY SEWER • At the developer's request, the City recently amended the Comprehensive Plan to include the Royal Golf Club development within the [ity's designated Municipal Urban Service Area (kAU5A). * The developer is responsible to provide wastewater infrastructure tosupport the proposed development. All sewer infrastructure must be designed to meet City standards and constructed at the developer's cost. * The Preliminary Plat/Plans extend sewer service to the subdivision by constructing three new sanitary lift stations to address the varied topography with the last lift station located on the south end of the Plat at the new street access to 10th Street North. A 6-inch HPDEforcemain is then extended from the lift station along 10th Street to connect to the existing 16-inch HPDE Lake Elmo Avenue sanitary forcemain. • The sanitary sewer system layout as proposed is generally acceptable, No pipe oversizing is required. The sewer system has been designed with a gravity sewer stub extended to the south end of the Plat. w The lift station site plans submitted by the applicant indicate that the proposed lift station sites are too small as proposed and will likely need to be enlarged to properly accommodate the proposed facilities without added ownership and maintenance burden. � The lift station sites require improved on -site grades, better access and turnaround areas for daily maintenance routines, better on -site screening and greater separation from other utilities. It is recommended that the [ity's lift station consultant complete preliminary site designs for each lift station for the applicant to incorporate into the Preliminary Plat/Plans. The Preliminary Plat should be contingent upon revised Ou;otareas toaccommodate each o/the proposed sanitary lift station facilities. w Prior to connection permits being issued any non-residential sewer users need to be better defined for the City toconfirm service capabilities. GENERAL PLAN COMMENTS ° The proposed trails should be centered within the 30 foot wide dedicated Outlots. A minimum 6 foot mow strip must bereserved onboth sides ofthe trail. � The grading plan indicates significant use of retaining walls, Retaining walls should be placed within private lots and Outlots tothe extent possible tobeowned and maintained bythe H0A. � Landscape Plans should be reviewed and revised to avoid planting conflicts. Tree plantings most remain outside nfutility easements, including the small utility corridor, and clear from all storm water maintenance benches and access roads. Tree plantings must be offset a minimum oflOfeet from wa\ermains, sanitary sewer mains' and storm sewers, and offset a minimum of 5feet from water/sewe/servioes. PAGE 5 of 5 at at Existing Pipe!i 12" Now Developments 8" New Developinen15 take Elmo ft' Park 12" 19.8811! Piik Tower M3 Piptng Iownr 12" New Developments ti" New Developinenl LLNK12, Li,L.N1() Easton Village Village Park Preserve te9,, 9..9,9;k 9 rie.l.i.9r.1 9,0 * 9,4 0,00 too* Nam is se es 0 * raw 0 assieree. reiterig Tartan Park Hunters Crossing 1:vx,ere Ocxtxte;tme,, t:'eNt.:.,xtvee.t„)::, let "e> , 4,449194,1,9444, 494.41 1094, 19949_ 4,94,9,9,494 91,90 414, :19,9.,t Figure 1 City of Lake Elmo New Development Low Pressure Zone 2k2' FIF S Ervpi444,44449,4 Enaironertentai 5494,444, Inc Public Works Department Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director Wayne Sandberg, P.E. Deputy Director/County Engineer SteohenN/ensrnan Community Development Director City mfLake Elmo 3GOOLaverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Mn 55042 Re: Washington County comments omthe Preliminary Plat Royal Golf Club atLake Elmo, in the City of Lake Elmo Dear Mr. Wensmon, We have reviewed the Preliminary Plat of the Royal Golf Club Residential Development at Lake Elmo dated q/71/2U16.The Project io|ocatednorthofCVuntyStateAidHighxvay([SAH)1O /loth Street, south of 20t' Street North, west of Manning Trail North and east of CSAH 17/Lake Elmo Avenue. The project vviUconvertapproxinnate}yl47.9acrespf golf course, woodland, ball fields, grassland, and wetland to approximately 292single-family residential lots. The project will involve grading, installation of public and private infrastructure, open space preservation, tree clearing, and stornovvaterponding.The project will include approximately 9O.8acres of private open space consisting of woodland, stormwater ponds, wetlands, grassland, and turf areas. Based nnthe plans submitted, vveoffer the following comments: The plat needs to reflect future ridht'ofvvay along nnm5tre 10 and Lake 8nnn Avenue/CSAH 17 as identified in the Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2030, Transportation Plan, Minimum Righ\-of-WayWidths for County Roads: o The future right-of-way width a|ongCSAH 10 is 184feet [92 feet from the centerline of the roadway. The current preliminary plat, dated 9/21/2016, identifies 75 feet from the centerline of CSAH 10. The preliminary and final plat plan should beupdated toreflect anadditional I7feet ofright'of'vvay. o The future hgh width along [SAH17/LakeElmo Avenue is15Ofeet. Some of the pages on the preliminary play identify the right-of-way as 75 feet from the centerline of CSAH 17. The applicant should verify the 75 foot right -of way on all the pages of preliminary plat, and provide this information to the county and the city before the preliminary plat ioapproved. Road North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-9573 Phone: 051-4304300 ^ Fox: 0514304350 ^ //`t 851-430-6240 uhi Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Page 2 March 620l7 Preliminary Plat Royal Golf Club Residential Development The access points at CSAH 17/Lake Elmo Avenue and CSAH 10/10th Street are acceptable to the county. The developer has submitted turn -lane improvement plans for the intersections at [5AH I0/101h Street at Street U and C5AH 17/Lake Elmo at Street E that meet county requirernents. These plans doreflect comments from the county onthese turn lane improvements aspart ofthe development. Currently, the timing ofthese improvements should be coordinated with the CSAH 17 improvements planned in 2018-2019. The County will coordinate the plans and cost participation with the City of Lake Elmo on these improvements. Any work in the county right-of-way as it relates to the development will require a [ight- permit, including: grading for the installation ofculverts, installation ofwater and sewer services, turn lane modifications, road improvements, trails, Americans with Disability Act (ADA) ramp improvements. A County Trail is shown on the Future Trail System map in the Washington County 2030 Comprehensive Plan. This is a long range plan to be implemented as development occurs, or if a larger roadway project isp]anned,8asedonthecurrentnJadvvayaUgnnnentwithLakeRnse adjacent to the CSAH 10 roadway, a trail could not be constructed without impacting the Lake. Any trail should beplanned aspart ofalarger project andvvi|)6geva|uatedatthattirne; however, asmall section could beconstructed along CSAH1Oeast of Sk,eetD. Although the county has not reviewed a storn0vvaterplan todate, the developer, city Or watershed district, must submit the drainage report and calculations for review ofany downstream impacts to the county drainage system. Along with the drainage calculations, there must bcwritten conclusions that the volume and rate Of3tDrnlvvaterrun-off into any county right-of-way will not increase as part of the project. Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from adjacent highways could exceed noise standards established bythe Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MP[A),the Q.S.Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7O3O.OD]Dstates that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the IVIPCA's Noise Area Classification (NAC) where the establishment ofthe land use would result iOviolations cfestablished noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. 060 Myeron Road North, Stillwater, MinnmsotaS5882-9573 Phone: (351-430'4300 ^ Fax: 051'480'4350 ^ TTY: 651430-6246 wowv.cm.*mahinAton.mnua Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Page 3 March 6,2017 Preliminary Plat Royal Golf Club Rcsdeotix]Dsvelnpnzeot County policy regarding development adjacent toexisting highways prohibits the expenditure ofhighway funds for noise mitigation measures insuch areas. The developer should assess the noise situation and take any action outside ofCounty rightof+waydeemed necessary to minimize the impact ofany highway noise. if you have any questions or comments to the responses on the Royal Golf Club Residential Development Preliminary Plat please contact me at Ann.pung-terwedo@co.washington.mn.us. Sincere Ann Pung'Te,w6do,Senior Planner Cc: Joe Gustafson, Traffic Engineer 11660MyoronRoad North, Stillwater, Minneuuta55OO2-9573 Phone: 651-43V-4300 ` Fax: 651'430'4350 ` lTY: 051-430-6248 www.co,washington.mn,us STAFF REPORT DATE: 5/2/17 AGENDA 1TEM: 7 CAsE# 2017-15 TO: City Council ITEM: Royal Go1f Club at Lake Elmo Grading Permit SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director REVIEWED BY: Emily Becker, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer BACKGROUND: HC Royal Golf Course Development has made application for preliminary plat, but final decision of the preliminary plat by the City Council is on hold until the Metropolitan Council approves HC Royal Golf Course Development's comprehensive plan amendment. Because the preliminary plat is essentially on hold, the developer is requesting a grading permit ahead of preliminary plat approval in order to make use of good weather and to speed up the physical development of the project. Development grading typically occurs after preliminary plat approval and the grading is then performed according to approved preliminary grading plans. In this case, the preliminary plat may change by either Metropolitan Council or City Council review, therefore, the City's review of the plans are primarily focused on meeting the City's grading and erosion control and other applicable codes and standards. Grading is also subject to meeting City standards for erosion control, Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD) approval and an NPDES permit. The grading will be conducted at the developer's sole risk. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: The Council is being asked to approve a grading permit to excavate over 400 cubic yards per acre of site area, the phase 1 grading of the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo development. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: The developer proposes to excavate over 400 cubic yards per acre of site area, triggering the need for a public hearing which was held on April 24, 2017 at the Planning Commission. The grading area is 73 acres in size and encompasses the northeastern and southwestern portions of the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo development area. Typically preliminary grading is conducted after preliminary plat approval and in association with approved preliminary grading plans. The developer is requesting a grading permit outside of the preliminary plat process in order to facilitate early grading in the event the preliminary plat approval is delayed. In either case, the grading will be conducted according to grading plans which will substantially conform to the preliminary PUD plans that have been prepared and reviewed to date and are anticipated for approval with some inodifications. Grading is also subject to meeting City standards for erosion control, Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD) approval and an NPDES permit. Grading prior to plat approval does not guarantee approval of the preliininary plat and is conducted at the developer's own risk. In approving this grading activity the developer will be asked to acknowledge as part of the grading City Council meeting Agenda Item #7 5/2/2017 agreement that grading rework will likely be required as necessary to conform to the final approved Plat and construction plans. Access to the site will occur at 1011' Street North and 20th Street North for the grading and locations will need to be identified on the grading plans to be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. There will be no trucking of materials on or off the site. There will be no utility work conducted with the grading. Utility work will be conducted after preliminary plat approval and under a Site Work Agreement which will establish appropriate securities for such work. As outlined in the Planning Commission report, the developer will remove 35.4% of the phase 1 trees resulting in the need for tree replacement associated with the phase 1 grading. An escrow for tree replacement will be required as part of the Grading Agreement to be executed between the developer and the city FISCAL IMPACT: There should be no fiscal impact to the City. A grading agreement will be executed prior to any grading activities that establishes a security for required tree replacement, erosion control and site restoration in the even the developer is unable to complete the site restoration. OPTIONS: The City Council has the following options: 1. Approve Resolution 2017- approving the grading permit with 7 conditions based on findings. 2. Amend Resolution 2017-_ and then approve it. 3. Deny the grading request, and provide findings for denial to be brought back at a future meetinc,r. PUBLIC HEARING/PLANNING COMMISSION REVIEW: The Planning Commission held a public hearing and reviewed the grading permit on 4/24/17. Three residents spoke at the public hearing and two residents sent emails of support for the grading. The residents that spoke were primarily concerned with: • Hours of operation • Protection of an adjacent drainfield Flood and watershed protection • Safety on 2011' Street N. The Planning Commission recommended approval (7-0) with an amendment to one of the conditions of approval and an additional finding for approval. Todd Williams made a statement regarding impacts to adjacent residential properties as a result of the excavation for ponding in the northeast corner. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Corrunission respectfully request the City Council approve HC Golf Course Development's request for a grading permit with the following motion: "Motion to approve Resolution HC Royal Golf Course Development's grading permit to grade the phase 1 Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo residential development area with 7 conditions and findings for approval." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Narrative Page 2 City Council meeting Agenda Item #7 j/2/20|7 Z Royal Golf Club at Lake Elino Grading, Development and Erosion Control Plans dated 4/7/17 I Tree Preservation Plan 4. Planning Coomoiouioupacket 4/24/l7 THE�7���� ROYAL GOLF CLUB m^��n��� ������ «��w�n� Grading Permit Background Tartan Park, 3M's private 27-hole golf course and recreational facility was purchased by H.C, Golf Course Development, LLC in March nfZO16. Since that time, the golf course reconstruction and proposed clubhouse renovation have begun with an expected opening Summer of2O17. HI.Golf applied for aComprehensive Plan Amendment onSeptember II, 2016. This application was approved, conditioned on Metropolitan Council approval, January 9, 2017. The EAW for the Royal Golf Club was approved by the City Council on January 17, 2017 and the Zoning Text Amendment for the new Golf Course Community designation was approved onFebruary 7w,2817. The applicant has prepared a5hore|andPUD/[|uster evaluation that isinthe final stages ofreview bythe City ofLake Elmo. OnSeptember 8,ZO16, H.C.Golf requested that the City undertake aWater Supply study based onthe City Engineer's recommendation during the Concept Plan review. The study bcomplete, the recommended changes toRGC'swater looping system have been made. RGC has obtained its required Wetland Alteration Permits and received approval ofthe Wetland Replacement Plan. The Planning Commission isexpected togive approval the preliminary plat March 27, 2017. Due tothe need tofinish afirst phase ofdevelopment bvthe end uf2UI7 the surrounding cities taking their full 60 days to comment on the CPA, and with the same time of review expected bythe Met Council, itisnecessary to apply for agrading permit prior tothe preliminary plat process finishing in its entirety. Pmm'ect Phasing �� Development Phasing The first phase of development(installation ofstreets and utilities directly serving platted lots) will be the northeast side of the site. This comprises 84 lots, both villa and traditional single family) and the streets tnserve them. The sewer toserve these lots comes from the intersection of Lake Elmo Ave. and D]th Street soa 1.5 mile forcenmain will need to be installed across the golf course and down 10' to serve this phase, The first phase is served by water from the intersection of m Street and Lake Elmo Ave. This arrangement is unusual in that developers generally try to develop nearest the infrastructure source tominimize front end costs. |nthis case, due tothe County requirement that the clubhouse be hooked up to sewer and water with 24 months of sewer being available tothe site. This requirement economically makes development of the east side the most efficient. Utilitv Phasing Asmentioned above, extensive utility work isneeded toserve the first phase and clubhouse. Assuch, RG[will berequesting a"Site Development Agreement" toextend certain utilities once preliminary plat approval is obtained but prior to receiving final plat approval. There two segments ofthe utilities that this agreement will apply to. One segment isthe wate,nnainalong 2 o* Street toPhase l. This m/oterma{nwill not be "'hooked up" to anything in Phase 1; it will simply be "brought" to Phase 1. Additionally, tofacilitate restoration ofthe golf course so that grass can grow back in this summer, the Site Development Agreement will allow for the construction of the forcennain, waternnain, sanitary sewer, and storm sewer within the omlfcourse limits. The sewer and water lines will not be energized — they are put in solely to shrink the construction schedule and allow the course toheal over the summer. The storm sewer will connect Pond 1OtoHorseshoe Lake. This pipe (and pond) will likely bedry until the subdivision storm sewer system is installed. The hJrcennain and the vvaternoain will not be hooked up to anything until after final plat and final utility plan approvals. Because these are not as"elevation sensitive" like infrastructure inthe subdivision, they can be put in first and any needed adjustments can be made when they are hooked up to the lift stations and subdivision watermains. The sanitary sewer serve line will serve the clubhouse, fitness center and maintenance building; there is sufficient enough grade in the sewer line serving these buildings that we are not concerned with grade. Again, this pipe will not beenergized; this isexpected inZOl9. The remaining utilities (subdivision utilities to serve lots) will all be put in under the normal process — final plat with Developers Agreement, final approval of construction plans, securities, plat recordation. Grading Phasing The Phase I grading encompasses the NE area of the site in addition to the SW corner. Because a second phase of development will likely occur early in 2018 (in the SW corner of the site), it is preferable to grade this portion in late 2017 in advance of utility construction in Spring ofZO18. Additionally, there is a certain amount of grading in this area that will be necessary to bring sewer down to the |iML station located on 10* street. Grading Specifics During the Phase 1 grading, approximately 73 acres will be disturbed, creating a common excavation quantity of 224,000 cubic yards, not including subgrade corrections and trench borrow, A large excavation willbe created in the corner ofZ0m Street and Manning Trail to replace the floodp|ainthat was filled toprovide for anentrance tVZO1hStreet, There will also be the necessary storrnvvatertreatnoent and infiltration basins required byCity ordinance and VBVVDru|es. All disturbed areas will be restored with seeding and fiber blankets per rule and ordinance. There are several retaining walls shown as part of the grading plans. At this time, it is expected that walls 5' tall or less will be constructed of large limestone blocks and that walls in excess of 5' will he of poured concrete with a limestone -like pattern. As more information regarding costs are obtained, it may be decided that all walls will be made with large limestone blocks. All walls will be maintained by the Homeowners Association. Tree Preservation Tree preservation plans for Phase lgrading are included. Aspreadsheet isalso included showing all the trees inPhase 1along with the expected removal, Asshown, the tree removal with Phase 1isl2Y6therefore not triggering any replacement. Regardless, the landscaping for the Phase l plat (84 lots) will contain landscaping that will be counted toward future tree replacement when those phases occur. Wetland Impacts Wetland l6onthe attached plans will beexcavated with this phase. This alteration has been permitted through the required agencies; the replacement will be by way of purchasing wetland credits. /\nK4nP[Apermit has been applied for and acquired. Rick Packer President � , HI.Golf Land, LLC ' - „.„ „ •••— • —'" EXISTING PARKING z.01 HMMK '•"" H.C. Golf Coorso Dovolopmeot, LEG MU ti0/4 OUTLOT (3 A \ THE ROYAL GOLI CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 1.4,n• PRELIMINARY SITE & WITITTY PLAN 0 Course Oc�+Etopment. LLC 2 Ti) OVAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO PRELIMINARY SITE & +^- •° +t'° ^"'�+ i UTILITY PLAID 2.1 VcS91 .„, 'Golf Course, Dtr44tprrlertt, LLC :11144.4 4,1 149 II -OE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO -- PRELIMINARY SIT E & UTILITY PLAN 1 $ f-iif Sij 0 • '0 t` t TJTUirr- =-- Goff Cnurse Deveiopment, LLC Ito 0 d01,,,, t0 14* 1,00, IIIMIg.........11•111111111111111.• TIIE ROYAL GOLF CLUFI AT LAKE ELMO 4RELIP4INARY 5ITE & UTILITY PLAN 11' GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLANS BLAINE, MINNESOTA • , a 'V..' t .Z.-:....,4 ,3,.*., '''..., ... . • • , V`a SHEET INDEX CevER 2 W2AONG NOrk 2ttaDo40 Ottadiata. & toaSaaN CCatt.201 PLANS 6-8 orra..s ma -Lis 0 t,1 ' • VICINITY MAP IrTENCIINIARKS :444.4 4 lAz $4 (kit. t. ICC. Gott Course Development LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUE AT LAKE EURO 1101A RattEsotto Ro 50 Lake COI% Minnesota Noirat. 210 55440 Know whaobelow, Call olore tot. dig. COVER of / 21 .4 4 --neo—r • '••••,, ,- • . . „, , ,, , , . 811 '. . 4 ' Cariseln r McCain if.i.mrarsbelow. Cali before yOo FEFF 0 M.C. Golf Course Development, LLC in kulisron P.r1NC• Blaine. FIN 55449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLOD AT LAKE ELMO 1.4ke [Imo, 1.1Inne5ola ,Af.4111.,‘ PCS 3.-Vr ftriAtgo ,(4.2 '1 Y.Me JIMA. ,L+,rrs r v.., ZT ,1,747HF.A.sr P1.00fIFIAlf.1 =QLH f fooDovob otofoot fLoob 'fo EfW.O.Off, b, RIONCHibfARKS o . INDEX 2 / 01 20TH STREET NOR .T C) SKEET4 H.C. Golf Course Developments THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Late C4nO, Mlnnefnia an GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN H.C. Golf Course Development, UC 11074 rtatlicsoo 0.0 tiE DIEne, t4N 554/9 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUE1 AT LAKE ELMO uhe Elr,% r4iInErsoln GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 4 / / 2 1 EL-22 NORREE7818 /61711761764667,8aire — Reeve, 78). MN DER 82-761 88. 5786 IDE 61 WAL 877.4 an, 0 1 , 1L, Lermie. DL1TLOT D /7 I LJONCRIENTAL) H.C. Golf Course Development, t1.074 R4diasooRt1 NE 18666, 14659449 YAL GQLP CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, ELenearrIa GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN s/ / 21 IIM-Ba OU TLOT A 'oo rR H.t 2 OUTLOT C 411HG PAIMNG {AX N.C. Golf Course Develo ! 1Q'ra RadESsan Ptf ME EUe%Pc, MN 55=49 RETNKIN THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO GRADING, DEVELOPMENT wcc Elmo, riinne,or & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 6 / of H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC LIO?4 Namswn Nd NE OWN., MN 51449 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO laka Elmo, MlnnesON GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 2G OUTLOT BB RETAltooN pp , i l ---,' , so . OUTICT D 'TT m,o4, N.C. Galt Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO L1074 RadIssEn PO NE Lake Elmo, Knnegoo Diane, MN 554449 BENCRM , at T TETE , GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 12 / ur / 21 "ThmeNsk^ r -1; ouii6 -4BENCHMARKS " 1 I mccoin :tr,:.:,-,-. ;,:,.;11,,,Ezt•F:: Golf Course Development, U.0 11074 Nalktsen kiN NE Bialre, MN NSkIkIN „ .. .. kNN• • mm kkk THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Mkromukta r U , N :1: NEE 5.E`ET 41.1 GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 2 cCain H.C, Golf Course Development, LLC Hort gdt.I..x., Rd NE fita4le, MP: 55449 T E ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lok, Elmo, flInfmsola fitNCHMARKS a.1 aelt GRADING, DEVELOPMENT F. EROSION CONTROL PLAN 14 / / 21 OtiR 22-70 i ve.a H2L S724. C*iayci, di* *. (r*G,*0 2 **** li 4 A A ' .... / ..." ...:.- ...„.../'*,.. ' \ / / ..'-' \ / ig MO / ' / ' / -':// / r i .. // ,./ r// / /*/ ./.„, N.C. Golf Course Development, L 11014 Raddson Hd He tHaoe, MN 55.19 ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Ono, Knee., AECHMARKS 'LT " GRADING, DEVELOPMENT & EROSION CONTROL PLAN 2 2 IBCRADE COR TYPICAL POND SECTION V1,131111A.:113 IL4-272 CITY OF LAKE ELMO ild11,141 / LLL 47 3 INFI!.TRAT103# BASINS TFMPQRARY SEDIMENT BASIN IV/PERFORATED RISER PIPE /Carlsan McCain TT'PICAL STREET SECTOR sow, o (STA 4.13 Im. 50 65 1<Jw - za Tin TYPICAL STREET SECTION %t0000 o (SYA 34r0o Im 501ta0) 8'? 41w - TEE BM H.C. Golf Course DeveFopmenk, LLC ilo74 ,,aEltssno Rd NE Blaine, MN 55449 3u;v'r1k4>;la I90ICAM. 4WC.u. FEESIDENTOT. SEEM SECTx1N (ssaevef T-mu omom TYPICAL STREET SECTION SMELT A (RNT0R .swa 45TEA. 8Q+na fa tioo} IT BITUMINOUS ACCESS ROAD THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lake Elmo, Rinnesol4 DETAILS 21 MODULAR RETAINING WA (690 SF) MODULAR RETAININ 922 (600-SE) 920 910 9I6 914 912 910 ALL P3 40 40 40 50 100 120 MODULAR RETAINING WALL y5 (1001 SF) 910 906 904 902 900 MODULAR RETAINING WA2 {2060 SF) 900 H.C. Golf Course De le 11014 0440400 00 40 1000M, MN 55449 LLC 00 400 F60 100 200 220 240 260 NM MODULAR RETAINING WALL #4 (uo0 sF) w 00 00 500 120 MODULAR RETAINING WALL P6 (025 SF) 160 20 .0 60 90 100 020 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO RETAINING WALL PROFILES 1 Ake FIn,p, 00000500 150 240 902 900 898 896 694 692 906 904 902 900 898 896 20 918 918 914 912 910 (r)Carlson McCain MODULAR RETAINING WALL 6,7 (3100 SF) 100 1. 3340 too 3380 200 220 240 2330 2043 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #9 (1055 SF) .MODULAR RETAINING WALL #11 (920 SF) 20 00 60 BO too 120 100 150 O. 2033 2 0 BB. 894 892 890 688 886 864 320 SO 896 894 892 890 888 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #8 (1125 SF) 20 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #10 (15911 SF) tOo 120 1411 1330 I'. 20 4333 00 3433 00 120 140 160 100 3300 220 240 2013 200 2330 Goll Course Devetoputent, LL 331074 R.... NE Maine, BIN 55449 OVAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO lake ElmaMinnesota RETAINING WALL PROFILES / 21 140 160 100 220 240 240 20 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #13 (2950 SF) 892 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #(2 (1850 OF) 890 888 886 884 882 680 20 40 60 00 t00 902 900 898 894 892 890 888 886 220 040 MO➢ULAR RETAINING WALL #14 (1530 OF) 20 40 00 00 160 120 140 160 ICU 206 220 240 240 020 fP Course Deeslopmen LLC 11074 124220000 00 hE 01201e, 002 00449 924 MODULAR RETAINING WALL #15 (693 SF) 20 40 60 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO take Flmo, 1000.scla 100 120 140 1 A ETAINING WALL PROFIL 2 AREA aaeAC tEKNALS 1,O5AC A P.M.. RAP.. 077707ig4iu 242414 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Redi4son Rd NE Otelne, MN 55449 it£ 2.32 Q VICINITY MAP 0E_CCIEBb75 t1H[C PNC5O127II0.1 PI,1n Ma 11H.C5 IpP,tts 71'13 114 otol f4A3 ,,, °4.4e 9 a. 7.9, e40M 0000 n017 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO leh' Elnw, Mlnne.4olt1 KEY YRMILI Aaaarr 14 At IA. NITZSZA TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T1 / or /25 kx rtFp F.NC HMARKS H.C. Golf Coors 11074 tllein THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Leka Elnna, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T4 �c 25 H.C. Golf Course Deve 11074 Fadisson Hd Blaine, MN 5544 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUS AT LAKE ELMO Lake Limo Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN H.C. half C' 11074 Rad 8iaine, art; LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO lake EI,i3O, M,.1,ItSOfd TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T6 / /�25 N.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Radlsson Rd NC Bloire, MN 55119 PHASE BFNCH34Sk2 KS - THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO lake Elmo, MInnesol• TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T7 / of 2 AREA .11 A 8,24Af OVALS__ 0,00At ISEE SNEET Tld H.C, Golf Course Development, LLC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 41074 Rad,son Rd NF. Ia4e Elmn, IIinhiosuI O'aine, 411.155449 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN T12/ al 2S M.C. Golf Course De 11079 Rodmon 04 ra PIMne, MO 5 15 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO 1 ake rn:n, Momesota 13� TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ar 25 H.C. Golf Course Development, LLC 11074 Rn0155an RO NE Blaine, MN 55449 .24AC AC THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO Lase Elmo, Minnescl0 / TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 74or 25 eA 7McCain M.C. Golf- Course Oav 12074 Rmlimon psi nF Bfalne, MN 55449 ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO LaKO em0, Minnesota TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Ti5 of ' inCC sHfCr Tt h McCain Goff Course Oevelopme 11074 dadlssot Rd NE Blaine, MN 55149 ,AREA -11 SEA H.24AGi, ELIOVALS O,COAC: '\, THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE EL I IT TREE PRESERVATION PLAN Lake Elmo, Hlnnesoto 25 Golf Course Dev 11474 f 4lG5t4n EPatne, t4PY 55 VAI. GOLF CLUB AT LA Lake Elsa, Minnescla TREE PRESERVATION PLAN ---' z z z " t JattAgAtAtAggittAgAAAtAt " "VilYtiii.1.140nliPm1.421.111 1111411111.1017,1a,Miol,4a, •4:$.'g•M;1135 tf4524g;4144),45't • • • 44225S44414441581S1)451,11F144644414,514422444.44F45414414,444-44441EAgiRP6ka • • At AA At , 1 - 5445FI5254555F555 $F4545$445564555555445445;54414:141•0413F 41e • • i A: 55 fjoi-Ott1111 AlillgitA.21A1A °.t ,., • • Iiiii; W•114P4i,MilN 1 • rfff4Si '''113Unll 1 a . . 3E33444344:144134344•44 ail A A A ala laa,A ipAAA. 4,72444'4,M4F'444 • g PittlAAA.Op 011 I" liVt.11A 1 A F;N“Fir.:1F s 353.1331 A agAgtgaaaa. ;4F4S4,35544F4W444114•555EFF5F AaaaaisAAAA WI!!! lip,tg44',AA444,36:;;3A44,L,;4444744-;:4444,44;TT414.4-444.144144.,.4-444,4 42/11.1111!!:!I ' Ililiaq F f4-14 ; r 313— 3333334 ;33,3 ta... tArilat,A _ AAA ,AltighAl HAP ! ,, , •f- ...•-- . • fo435NN554444,17,1144.4341%$ Xi:A':' .445F,44-4f15114 AAllmAttgaAHHAApn "4; H t. 34345FF44,3443F4433 --I iiif . p445445I5F54F4F4444444'114415FiE5 5 55 5 54544.41EFF444,5iF55454 a laiE22! A 5 • 3 3 33r1:::33.3*'W33' • gagitgaga AlgatAilA 'PatIA!AAtAAtalAg altfALTAA3 Fe,AAtt ; I jAvagrAgazgAAAA AlAlAAttAAAAAthAtAIAAAA.iggAIAAAA AA,IAAAAtglAo "t" MF,14F4 4;F 414 4 F. Ali 4 5•4i 114 1, 444." A; A;A, 2!"4 4 4 F a ar a a- ag a t4,titt .3tt,- .t.t4,4,13AttAttettAttxtt4ttt,t3133t3tt,ty;tttAtttt443344FiF.43, i 35555 311 3331i31.q1,01M3 *gig rA 313,13 MA A At 'f...,..,.., ,.,...,. 4 .....3. —.— — .1 "•1; , 3 At„ 1 , P 4 iftiil A AAA ta.a.sa ..a t i ,t,,, 5 "Alioil 511tAAAAAIAAAIAA.A5i51-05AAAAAiiiili5,5WAA.A,AWIA4A 111,1111PAifilillEADaillfitilAml!filAITY SAWA • I • 14/ '; 41 ; lAgAaggag[gagagaggaita!gagaggaglaaagaAagagagggagaggAggalgagA.AggagagaggagAgg il _ • I, i i .1 . . .„.- t. i 0.3illiilillr ' r l'' - il INfijillk 49;1 3111111J 3: t aaaaaa,aaa f 'AShailMia ,,,,,a,! ' z , . . 13/333,`3333.3.-33raga.33313333-33:33.133;;33333'33E-E.E337,31.”.333ETE33:133333.33231'333-3E333.3333.3:3'3.3E3333'.3'3341'3331.333E';333;3333-333:3.1'r.E3tEE3ET't33:!3—t E 3 ............ 1 i33333.3.333,3133$33 triliffititH 1 idEfa3a2a3.:a333132:31-333-..°4a--EuffihEE 313313-31a3311433Ilitliiili: '"'"n43'"!Iljtiiti133a3q113alasaa mas33,3EEYE,333331.3! „ 33aE03.33."33,”-33?-31aftEflfRt 373333t5 31 --.333a.a 5 - aaE$E533,allaaaa3E3aaaaaa3afiaiaaiaE3aaaaaaaaalgiaaa4aiiaia4 ,, 1 fiii31313111331310 3113113,1111,3 1 i 334-11, ;Ig 333 3'33 13313)3133133W3 IA!! 1-0133m3 .;'3i14,t'ttlttIalffaialkHEEEkkagallai, ! -1.-- ;12112;1i;i3C.IZTi!=T;252,2:.4;147,.:=22ti"'445.1-,,=.q il11#4 A]lltr,.:z =-.14Ile M5iTIMfM3ag.g03gggiikffliilliPiliiiligiiP $ 3310.33h”,333331iii-t4 333313133'14fInf.11333353"1;3 3331-34,143L:33333 ISI]ada333'333 1 ... tia444=-3244gEaa-4244a44----a33444331444------0a2ta33a4231413.4.33,4i144d341-43433a4Et4E:EE4E-3tE34-313.34EGa . _ I., ;Huipli,;Lialliillii.qq13. tr,,tti 4!,0441i1t413.010;iiiiiii4Iiiiiiii, Si 1V1)'n12A1=P*" OngiOMPLIW11.;W;:Efil,14. a 1 17 f 1E_1 2,14,,,T,:n 1 f f 1- 1 - . 4 ='“$,F,P,:5•,;':15,.C,.€455;:ii,,,C=.,tiH.;“ai.h;.,,c.1.,,:::fl,,,i="::.“.1,,,'ii.4.,€:=1,1,,,F,',4,:ii,:=4516.9,ii.:EiFi.753.5.=i,,,,...,..,11,..5=i,:irW.,f;;:i.:fS 0 g ili I i , °I "A!ifil 01= sai 4 : : I .... . J t 2 'iiIiii!!4tic;14WiffilltAlliPglIgL:46: ' 1,313-333'3533'tit'303312313333331,-.3,3-331 ,343311:3,3334ff3L-333,34.3333,331=3x.333 3'1Y"1343 3 3.3333 - 3 3.33 3 3 3 3,3 a .13 ha. .1 zl,'iz. ,i,r,,C1-41.a 13341§M133!E313331M4g1933NMMIW31.131334A133.333Wa-M33,!3M!! ,!?.-33g3314i32g3333g34, 1 1 t ...... --- 2 ' -----, X 322 '.-5,fltOtt SAVittlit“Tit'fltitlAtcAtAt'ititAWA'n,741.7 %5. 411- 4 5 229257223 5.12:3;WI'4MAIP“Wif.;1 32 tzit; 11111111/1HPHHIffinill 'PO tAAJAAAA'AdIAAAj'A-6:tAtAztzliAta.,A 833 tt 5 Q. UJ .28 ott 0 0282 to= 82 2723322 ittt,4WEAI“E'.6,C1,fli Af• UAtit,t1,P 11fiA441,A-1...7A.A,,,ZA,,,ArTJAttlt.A:."tt.„.AlAti,AfAlltAAAAIAAttAttttl'ttttA'AAAAA,-!'AtIAAtAAArA.AAtt'A,,Atzt,',AtktzAtz't,;;A:ttA;--,Atk-tt-A3-tttAA;A,AAIAAAA,!AttAAA,JAA-A,At ; ; 3,33,3 33. 3 3.3D11.1 ii:940;113”. l; &•OzAt..44g;41. lt;tM2, A,,-At,,,z,ktz AA Atko , A ;tPAnitl-fltAttttW]3100g.t-t.A, I t 3! r A IkAA A VI. 3.- a At,I=, "74:i- f 1 . , 0. i J. t 4 Y A r Y. 70 . A 1-4 4f444141..4.4.,,44 Y WM1.41 . 4[ 4:..... he 0 42, ML4e 4. 41 N14404 i4 R Mil, 44 l. X Vie- .. 4 .. 4 - -.4 . ,zzyz, - Ito ,,,....AAA.A.A.A.A_A—t—z,,,,,;,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,.,,,,,,,,,,,zzz,,,,,,,Azz,,,H,..,,.;;;;;;.,;,,;.gzz2z E-t "' 1 ; nitiMiliUtOligPMMAIMPIOqirAIMMOMinillinnBidl" AA1 !DISiSit§IEWAVD:ilAJIM-3,8 744111141,13,TEL9',A;,1ilti6,,,A.AA,,AHAtAti_ Eg is A A 1 Ak A 1 A . , 219 +,- t A g __AA -,,A„,,AAAAltatAAAArAtAtAtAAA,At,tsAAAAAA,AA,AA,,,t.AtttjlA,,,A,4',4.A1''tg w„ nit4Thli,ilitUA'illilSALIA!rl79 f V5IMMN'IfliZIN)igii!qiI!!!!!! Ht;I:1 ititli"W“tqlitAttl gAqsA . AAAtk,At,AAtAIA-p,A,Algtotu ApA,A,AAAA ; '!".11 :111 ;15:1 p.V 11;HP yrt ;; u; ttliAEtfilfttl.'4,?1."E-A*ItliZ'4figglgitlit21 j pj3,335353:5555;3315535t5;33335,525z2Z3153351221 5555W 33,33135f,5132535,et5555555515,55,33333'15353353455 —5553535, 3j333 5 11 I 33333331.331333133333133,333333133333333333,33333,331133g333433 3333MMIM3111t3ft11W313113/ 1313 "1 rmiii i:- 2imp,IsslItqL,4AL-0., ifip44, ,-. 33333,7,3, t,73444334:444144i4;44ntst;4-.444.445444,n44SSX341.434444444, 4,5.2.t:45,447,24X;:4Z4:44X4i4S.144,44 35355 i53:51634t5 5I,51355*2 I ," t 5 '3i, 3 3,55p55$353555,555555$0,7 331 z 3z Alz 4 3 333M3" 331331:11y.,11 1 ' 4.4 IS44I4 ' 444 i 33 t 0 i . a 5,555,3555535535555115e3533535555531335' ..J.,,.... 1-, 3 'I iii.;±3333R3133133:3331,,4z13:13.3,,,k;1=z;31t43,,Gz3iI3-,3:33=;,r2.3,-;.3.,3.2.--3,1,31S,48-z 1 1 W.11MilliOrii-114413N134, 311631334AA3331 ATAWilgW-gg41 ii,(0g:;1111c1"“41gg:1,40,0g:.allaiinItgg,"gg3!gt UMIF.4.:LIZ. 553t5,55m35tt 55515,6550A 3:53'1555555441335:3313135335313315353,325355.11'4554531Milia* 35 7r lissitst4lIt«t4IIi4441m:/'ii:24:44:E:44141S:.44i4t.ti.1.44tm44t=,t4,444,,,,,tut4444:z.13,4g44,4244,4;2:';44;t 335535553.5353 1.i i 11 1.1 t I It ! !, 3-55'5,115- I5-03 55555553555555513 1H1V111 331555.I5L505 -00 5335533455i u:37 L1,3'3gitgZ5-.13. 55555333553535535,5333i3531 ' 533 " 7 flhiiliUfltfl 3Z 4444 I3A31121331z ,i,-11,fg1X71th1,11441f4ggi.igln,1-,1141'11WA:f4,14allaglAz,ktriglA,Al'ATY,,iglIgizggglA,'Agug',4‘Ug 4 554:5444313544:34544;55:43.4:154, tilill:glIt4t,,,4;44.4q4: ,' 4nE4t:4444,,,,:i444V:/4t;4441,41t4W4,11.“,, ;: : a 41 1 SE -t$ I /4!4 g2: I.4 11 J.-i i [ ,3 11 I i ,Z1bAtt«::4 i :I 51 ; il7 1 ;1T3 1"11911 W17IiIWil-V 0-5'55' 7 30 q-- . 1 I 31! , 3 5-1 5 1",3F11355'.15,35,I450:35. X 1 ii$55533335t1551,535,554335,35555,535555334$ 1 i5135'43:14:I51;4154551.53453,15.555334:53:343i44.43.41,1444.14,44:142,544,44:35:31S,;p1:;4245,1,3,44p1,1434SSt5 ILIJUHLINIMiI . ,I1:0113"31P344101illiiiii i 3'3,1f!ii3333:i533; fi t ,,,,,,y3isag,3.3.3PaM.A3A., il F11.'11 - '11: 4.144ttte 1 'EErplo.:4,42,,tp,2zsl,iT,,t,I,11,i,ptm q,lp11,4nly. 55'3555EU51513,535 3 I ! I a, 1 ! . ! ' [ [ 1404%.4W.WAOVW,Ol.,(A”..“WigAMitl,4“K.M,012WMAKI.SHOMAYAX.,,4...H.,..H 1111,1 !V 1I11111 11111111t1111Wiilliillinililf11111M3 ' sd • ''';'11.37131A.;11.1411,"13.33;3t134i5iii4i13;1"""W E-1- , , 12 ,111.31 fA. Wlijiii"P111;11iffil"ilfillialliiiiiri 1 .,[ A[0.14L;Ird,AWIli[4111111111/1Aiimgils4.isJsik[iS „i gl" r 11a1J14As. XA ; - — :51:5111,4531,15 131 :11,31 3'15 31135 51537, 313,1 '1.1 11..1.33311,,,,155, ts /t;bt,t .31. a 5 5 61, 5 q 3- a, 55-355,:.5555 , 31111a .133 z ../^,3m!..5.1zay-4,1,11.[5111."5.4141.,53.:111.515,1541:11.355.1.14L1511 111.'4; I e ! tT1211111:1-5111111111;110111t11;111tTYITA1,11311 !t2Alla,4,40iAtt11,1111SIA;ligtj111,1M1181a130A-, "4/T4,3444!IlifgaltTOlv !i.,4,4,,,,444442,44J74,14,4444g,,,i41441.44.1.44-44,47-- ,1„ .51pRE3111140E§110P-AW5g1,31§11174Tilii.13A-Wii 11 - ' : 33....,33.4333.5,3,1513333,1333.3 1 i513.4,i1111$14511$,111,ir 11 'iiiSFSStaa'[.[IIT.441pEi".0[a.p[o.-alal.a.0[La,041 FUTURE PH ii11,41ii,-,11:51,11,315,51.151.1“5.1315P515641113,?1,115315,1.1,1*H: 1,1,3 KilOig 7 SEFIVATION PLAN 13.1 A A! A A A A V E E 4'13?rn0411211t/1117.11HIT5TAIII1n1111:11M/kfp, aalbaa4 [[iltiiIttcwqg 111111111114)1:1111 r [[[, : alz ; ;:iLt: f313 U§ V513,13. H.M1::34.1E-34. Pj, HJW51,P, 74 3 ,i;:a 1,13 13,1:7; if114353,1,11FIYMIiiiHigriit, '2 1 ,11111,5*•,;•1'411.1,5.3,53„3.11,1.1;3115111;i115,1331,11,;311W en'EilalOillWHi4444riSL9 Mi4; 1111Ifli1!1U111'111iii11H11111 P -3: s. 111. Jt .0j. I 51,5514,31;,5153,3531,153,11,11.,14i15115,111i,Li11511455171Y11•W ;15, 41 illiir 1 i 1 V3-4 ! I 1. 4 53i0',511.11!111r,[131[[1,5,1mAl T.:' I110.11.§,!J qiniiiji 4 iii,=311,Zng141p,„;f241A-U3;133;3;12,g1111323,1n1PA4!,94,,40,10141112M,2244312.,;TAn11141,,,,,,1. ,5! '1411:21"41flliinillUil;:ai 1'1111 3 . , 4? ili;41,551 ;IiATI3p03R,M§4M;M3;;.;33,11,1WIJM53M3641e1 53 111 '11-111-111i , 51,3:51331-51-15":111151511'14;$5,71zi1111111511i53.14S11311551113i11111115111115,13q1,1.1,335131311$511.551 tuci 111TtIWYLrT I 4tiVEMp*1113 1 iA "i5.5 1t 3.5.3313 31313 ii11:113 • A- A A • 1151171e '27] I ! 3 r . 4i5 1L;ir 0;'4S 31,1,W1123,1:,15511:111i510:1 11;251'1111'1...1;151.; '111,70g1“11,11,1,Ji, eA,4,1gIni,Ig1.411,,,w144L1g51v, 1A,121,1E/li1;111111141141110.0.1111.011 1111i1151,5111171:N§41511111121111 3 &&&&&&•&&&333.33.33333333333333A3A333333333'.33-3,334:33.3333.13333;AAti3,35,3333331,3303335.3333333133333:331333 ' 31131 A353 A ;3343-, g 333 f A 4 ,1 A133,3:331,131 & MAP 37,,A11.23 1 A33& -11333,3„333 '1' 1, - 3- • ; , . , , . . ; 1; - - - H- - ';',- - - - -3-- - - --11----3-11--+-3-3-3----H-I;3 *--------.1&'&&.--r&----1---&-&---3•- - 1 4 I ,, ,,,, 1 r 1 mliggggtii1i.g0,,1 11i1t001,111,i1A7,111,111111.1111gtgaii' R 1 iffil)isimi,iiipiiiislIMIJim,11p.„1.1,0g.1,-,),S,pgz411. g,1:',1,),24,f,ggkgg),,Igigeggiggig'jg,g3-,i w , , p.-1,- g. 4g, g: ,,g0g, ; 11C,,:,i,, •;&13,,..gl3&:::!!.3,,,3:,,,,q3„33313,,E3534114111-111.11.114Milililliiill,lliliElliiTililli;giiiiiiiill,ill ;: i Mil ilil - Si ta.1g. A Al 1 1 . ,I.,,,U1.1,1:11.11,55W,P.E1,1;S$11,5“11,557,1,31,1W1E13,41fig1gig17ii11.1iii!!1$1,11i1iS111,1$1,1Siii$gi4W.i.111112 , -I- A lomw.Mwggm,[2,-14,t,illill ; Llgallim ill- 12&121itili !.2.1' 1. hAiliiifiHnirilljniff . &,,,..v.3,3,„31 Ill laIlli Isiiiitill;Ill, 1 I i 3,C.V.......,,,,-, ..... 1 .-..- ' r , 1 • -, ' - I 1,,i4110;AiiiitZMItAll'11.1"44 1 ",„,-5 "Fe'",,g131- IMM!!'„!!!!MIMUMIZIW;111111-T5 I illillyI395111MilillilllititilipMAilMll illillikiWO :iMpAiMlill§.- Mt. 'il 13 11 ) '3 113.51112=i3g1=AA=A113=33===i=1.333431,1)114AAAAAAAA ;1,15:114.1., 1 „vi,s A1iA-i uij VIAL ,vgaggig A At g A ; 1/Y1111114'H, I-------------: ' ' : 1"i131,13:114T711"11;1,141D-110Z3. ag .,grjH,1` 11-1111,11.41- '1;,,t,“4.41,"1" 3g.kS,1, 11=1==I, igg 3313333331333.,33.&33&&•3&'3,3333,3,33,333333rA:33&•3E 1.-3gA'Aj.W-3,P:'"&&&rgiiraA33.M, g ..13,33333113&33,3„,15,3,3,33,&333i3.33,333,31,33,3,3&_ „.33,3:3333.33,3 3;1 ;- 4 AIM & I'v=4 3133-;333.; cv 0: lIHHfl:11 1111:;;;11111,1;,1.11;1.1.1g1,11,11S.111;11W,%g:111-i1,.;11H,11g1111i1,1141,11.11'g1,111g355';11.1i3.111,111g.iii.,115.“,..5111A11,11i..11gZ;,11111;111111111111:1111',11g21111.,“cf.1,111,111 11.-11t11—.11!I:11A ; Ft1=1 1111n31111"' ,gt8 4-li-AMMT333l33-3m3Mp-MMT,M3-33-23& I"051.1&. 3 ,3,11 11,g)1,211,,gggEwgzeRg-i,;1,1'§A'Viig. .1,..)gggwgig,gvgfggwi.,1E1g,g),,ig5Aggr, .g1,1.1,111.tY11,1,1111;g1',;,1141.14,1; V5'.1" al,!12111,111i,W111““1/g1111,(1“1411p11 /g.gatlf12',111.211111tlagg Tm,21):14-02,122,11).-MmtmmiliMq m4A1,1/),mim,111,mlgtimmml, 111 FUTURE PHASES INDIVIDUAL SHOTS CONT'D 1. 1. _plat P. ad 115i lata 44.4 tala are jaat jaat art... a PO- 1.0 Pax Pap. 1.4 aa A11,101. ' I 44. a P.M. ...PP Pree Tap.. ataaa Pori NOTE: TREE IDENTIFICATION AND TREE AREA CALCULATIONS WERE PROVIDEO RY KJOWAUC ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES. ,4-4,444.4 4-4`:4;E:7-42:E42.47A:44E.V" .444 _tor, 4.44 ara. TOTAL INDIVIDUAL TREE S[JQT ASSESMENT (ENTIRE SITE aaaran ,,-.1.04,.11.1,,,,g9h. 3: ,PprEpq ........arareap.... .1 .. P...............1..... .P. I ' r,,,,,, i .09 .............. LI a. 'w : ..... ate.......sp Pit .............. Pal TOTAL TREE PLOT ASSESMENT AREAS (ENTIRE SITE) taabat P.apraf P C.a.., ta.... aPaP,P. .. ..... ! aa. - , aeral aaaa pea. La. .....P PaPapaP PaPpapit ' PParaatt ..taaP halp, _t_, Ma a.. bar/. P.P. 1411Paa UMW PaP Pa aapp 39. 4.41 .rren aaa IP reP.1 PP. POP -, Pat a. • famf , 3 PP . NOM 1 aiaa O. i 0 Pa POP ' PaP . '..../ -4' PPP PPP Paata .. 0 litAt 7: Pappla 1 Lai r Pat 1 OW APP OW : 101 .1 ta. artz. . j 402 i. 14.11.1 Lila. PM i acp 4 o.4_,4„41 arak al . LAS I tat ' OW PM . 1.. , a OP Pia 1 Pa. I 1 ,,,.. = PlIal . ASP : Padat la .1019,1 ; aaa. 1... alppaa j It...p.a... a. ....pap tar PaParaa Vora 1.4.4 4,444, SUMMARY (ENTIRE SITE) ate =1...apaawtaiin Pk Pa PP la apa arra. Ma> Paa reta Q... !;-:•;;+ De,11 X.041flan -Tar?;.P7 11,C, Gall Course Development, LLC 110741 qadissv, NF Blaine, MN 554149 THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO LAI. Hata Min T25 TREE PRESERVATION PLAN 25 I11 ;\ IN FL STAFF REPORT DATE: 4/24/17 AGENDA ITEM: 4B— PUBLIC HEARING CASE # 2017-15 TO: Planning Commission ITEM: Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Grading Permit SUBMITTED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planninf_,Y Director REVIEWED BY: Emily Becker, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a grading permit request from HC Golf Course Development LLC to grade the first phase of the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo development. The developer proposes to excavate over 400 cubic yards per acre of site area, triggering the need for a public hearing, Planning Commission review and Council approval. Typically preliminary grading is conducted after preliminary plat approval and in association with approved preliminary grading plans. The developer is requesting a grading permit outside of the preliminary plat process in order to facilitate early grading in the event the preliminary plat approval is delayed. In either case, the grading will be conducted according to grading plans which will substantially conform to the preliminary PUD plans that have been prepared and reviewed to date and are anticipated for approval with some modifications. Grading is also subject to meeting City standards for erosion control, Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD) approval and an NPDES permit, Grading prior to plat approval does not guarantee approval of the preliminary plat and is conducted at the developer's own risk. In approving this grading activity the developer will be asked to acknowledge as part of the grading agreement that grading rework will likely be required as necessary to conform to the final approved Plat and construction plans. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: HC Golf Course Development, LLC Property Owner: HC Golf Course Development, LLC, 11074 Radisson Road NE, Blaine, MN 55449 Location: Former 3M Tartan Park, PIDs: 25-029-21-12-0001, 25-029-21-13-0001, 25- 029-21-14-0001, 25-029-21-21-0001, 25-029-21-31-0001, 25-029-21-42- 0001, 25-029-21-43-0001, 25-029-21-43-0002, and 25-029-21-44-0002 Request: Grading Permit Approval Grading Site Area: 73 acres Deadline for Action: Applicable Code: Application Complete — 3/28/17 60 Day Deadline — Extension Letter Mailed — No 120 Day Deadline — Article V Zoning Administration and Enforcement §150.270 Stonn Water, Erosion, and Sediment Control Article III — Environmental Performance Standards REQUEST DETAILS 1-IC Golf Course Development is requesting a grading permit prior to preliminary plat approval. Because of the proposed grading exceeds 400 cu. yds. per site area, the request requires a public hearing, Commission review and Council approval. The developer is requesting a permit to move 224,000 cubic yards of material, not including subgrade corrections and trench borrow, on 73 acres and to remove existing trees to begin grading the planned phase 1 Royal Golf Club at Lake Elino planned subdivision. The Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD Plans on March 28, 2017, and the preliminary plat and PUD plans will likely be reviewed by the City Council at the May 16, 2017 City Council meeting. The comprehensive plan amendment to allow the development to proceed was submitted to the Metropolitan Council on 3/27/17 and is presently under review. The Metropolitan Council has 60 days to review the amendment. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES Tree Preservation Plans. An approved Tree Preservation Plan is required prior to issuance of a grading pernnt. The developer prepared a Tree Preservation Plan for the phase 1 grading that also shows tree preservation for all phases of the Royal with the preliminary plat application which has not been approved, however, the planned removal within phase 1 grading area is below the threshold for required tree replacement if considering the entire plat area. However, if the grading is viewed as a stand along project and future phases and future tree replacement do not occur, then the developer is 5.4% over the allowed 30% tree removal. Staff recommends that an escrow be established for the 5.4% of the caliper inches removed to cover tree replacement. The escrow can be released once tree replacement occurs for future phases. VBWD Permit. A Valley Branch Watershed District permit will be required prior to any grading work being done. The grading permit will be conditioned on VBWD approval. The VBWD has previously identified issues with the planned infiltration basins and other issues that the developer is working through. At this time, the developer does not believe the issues will impact to the proposed preliminary plat. At the time this report was written, the VBWD had not completed their review. Shoreland. A portion of the grading is within the shorelands of Downs and Horseshoe Lakes. The proposed grading is consistent with the Article 17 — Shoreland Management Overlay District regulations. An EAW was prepared for the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo development and the proposed grading is consistent with the environmental review and the City made a negative declaration for an EIS. Construction Access. Construction access was not identified on the grading plans as required. The developer had indicated that desired construction access would be off of Manning Trail and 10th PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4b — ACTION ITEM Street. The grading plans will be required to be updated to identify construction access for the project prior to the start of construction. Future Utility Work. As discussed in the applicant's narrative, there will be utility work associated with the development project, but this work will occur subsequent to the site grading. The applicant has proposed to install some utilities under a Site Work Agreement prior to final plat approval. If approved by the City a Site Work Agreement will be required to provide the needed protections, securities and escrows for the public utility improvements. Engineering Review. The engineering review for the Phase 1 Grading and Erosion Control Plans is ongoing as additional plan changes are being made to address VBWD pennit requirements and City engineering design standards. The Phase 1 Grading and Erosion Control Plans will need to be approved for construction by the City Engineer prior to any grading permit being issued. DRAFT CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Staff is recommending approval of the grading permit for HC Golf Course Development to conduct the Phase 1 grading activities on the properties with the following draft conditions: 1. That no utility work shall occur under the Grading Agreement. 2. That site access to the property be limited to 20th Street and 10th Street South and that the locations be identified on the grading plans. 3 That tree protection fencing be completed prior to grading and that the locations be staked and field inspected prior to installation. 4. That a tree replacement escrow be established in the Grading Agreement to cover 5.4% tree replacement of the 16,643.68 caliper inches being removed. 5. That the Developer enter into a Grading Agreement with the City acceptable to the City Attorney that delineates that the developer is responsible for the design, construction, and payment of the required improvements with financial guarantees therefore. 6. That no grading commence on the site until the Phase 1 grading and erosion control plans are approved by the City Engineer, the Grading Agreement is executed, the financial securities are in place, and a preconstruction meeting has been conducted with City staff. 7. That a Valley Branch Watershed District Permit and MPCA NPDES Permit are obtained and that all conditions of the permits are complied with. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed grading: 1. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat has not been approved by the City Council. 2. That the proposed Phase 1 grading will be allowed under the terms and conditions of a grading agreement approved by the City Attorney prior to preliminary or final plat approval at the developer's sole risk and does not provide any development entitlement. 3. That a Tree Preservation Plan was submitted with the grading plan that clearly articulates the impacts to the woodlands on the site and addresses tree protection and replacement responsibilities. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4b — ACTION ITEM 4 4. That grading will be conducted on site with no off site impacts beyond normal development activities. 5. That the Phase 1 grading and erosion control plans have been reviewed and approved for mass grading operations on the site with conditions complying with the City's Storm Water, Erosion, and Sediment Control, and Tree Preservation ordinances and design standards. RECOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the grading permit with the conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approved of the grading permit to grade the first phase of the proposed Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo plat area with 7 conditions based on the !dings in the staff report." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Narrative 2. Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo Grading, Development arid Erosion Control Plans dated 4/7/17 3. Tree Preservation Plan PUBLIC HEARING TEM 4b — ACTION ITEM CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-045 A RESOLUTION APPROvING THE PHASE 1 GRADING FOR THE ROYAL GOLF CLUB AT LAKE ELMO WHEREAS, HC Golf Course Development, LLC ("Applicant") has submitted an application to the City for preliminary plat and preliminary planned unit development which is under review by the City but has not been approved; and WHEREAS, HC Golf Course Development, LLC ("Applicant") has subsequently submitted an application for phase 1 grading for the preliminary plat prior to preliminary plat approval; WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 24, 2017 to consider the request for a grading permit outside of preliminary plat approval; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission recommended approval of the grading permit with conditions; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Planning Commission and public comments regarding the proposed grading permit on May 2, 2017; and NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED based upon the testimony elicited and infonnation received, the City Council makes the following: FINDINGS 1. That the Royal Golf Club at Lake Elmo preliminary plat and preliminary plans have not been approved by the City Council. 2. That the proposed Phase 1 grading will be allowed under the terms and conditions of a grading agreement approved by the City Attorney prior to preliminary or final plat approval at the developer's sole risk and does not provide any development entitlement. 3 That a Tree Preservation Plan was submitted with the grading plan that clearly articulates the impacts to the woodlands on the site and addresses tree protection and replacement responsibilities. 4. That the phase 1 grading is a standalone project as it pertains to the Tree Preservation Plan. 5. That grading will be conducted on site with no off site impacts beyond normal development activities. 6. That the phase 1 grading and erosion control plans have been reviewed and approved for mass grading operations on the site with conditions complying with the City's Storm Water, Erosion, and Sediment Control, and Tree Preservation ordinances and design standards. City Council Resolution 2017--045 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that based on the foregoing, the Lake Eltno City Council hereby approves the Applicants request for a grading permit with the following conditions: 1. That no utility work shall occur under the Grading Agreement. 2 That site access to the property be limited to 20th Street and 10th Street South and that the locations be identified on the grading plans. 3. That tree protection fencing be completed prior to grading and that the locations be staked and field inspected prior to installation. 4. That a tree replacement escrow be established in the Grading Agreement to cover 5.4% tree replacement of the 16,643.68 caliper inches being removed. 5. That the Developer enter into a Grading Agreement with the City acceptable to the City Attorney that delineates that the developer is responsible for the design, construction, and payment of the required improvements with financial guarantees therefore. 6. That no grading commence on the site until the Phase 1 grading and erosion control plans are approved by the City Engineer, the Grading Agreement is executed, the financial securities are in place, and a preconstruction meeting has been conducted with City staff. 7. That a Valley Branch Watershed District Permit and MPCA NPDES Permit are obtained and that all conditions of the permits are complied with prior to any grading activity. Passed and duly adopted this 2 day of May, 2017, by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: City Council Resolution 2017-045 FI 117. crry [AKE ELMO TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEM: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT City Council Emily Becker, City Planner Noise Control Ordinance Stephen Wensman, Planning Director Kristina Handt, City Administrator Councilmember Bloyer DATE: 5/2/2017 REGULAR ITEM #: 8 Reason for Ordinance Amendment. Staff had previously proposed to the Council an amendment to the City's Noise Control Ordinance on December 20, 2016. This ordinance amendment was requested for the following, reasons: • To Allow for Competitive Pricing and Timely Completion ofCity Projects, The City Engineer suggested that extending working hours similarly to other cities may allow for more competitive pricing on City projects and allow more timely completion of projects to minimize disruption to Lake Ehno properties. • Multiple Permits Issued. The City Administrator is often asked for permission to allow construction on Saturdays 8:00am or 9:00 am to 3:30pm or extended hours until 7:OOpm on weekdays. These requests are almost always granted, and so Staff feels that this standard should be given another thought. Only one complaint has been received by Staff from an Oakdale resident by granting permission for these extended hours. Additionally, amending the ordinance will save Staff time by not having to write approval letters each time a request is made. Feedback Received on Previously Proposed Ordinance Amendment. Prior to bringing the Noise Control Ordinance amendment to Council, a public hearing was held at a Planning Commission meeting. The following comments arose from this public hearing: • From the Planning Commission, The Planning Commission was only comfortable with the following revisions to the City's current ordinance: O Some Extended Hours. Extending the hours of construction operation from 6pm to 7pm on weekdays. o Exemptions,from Prohibition of Consiruction Activio.,. Adding exemptions from the prohibition of construction activity, including snow removal activity, parking lot maintenance or sweeping, and work on public infrastructure projects. o Clarifying that the City Administrator is able to grant certain exemptions for activity that is of urgent necessity and in the interest of public health and safety. o Removing language that allows a special permit to be granted for economic loss and replacing this with a provision that allows the City Administrator to grant permission to allow construction during outlined nines, There was also a change that restricts construction occurring during specially -allowed hours to at least 1000 feet away from any dwelling (previously 600 feet). • From the Builders Association of the Twin Cities (BATC). BATC provided feedback on the ordinance after the public hearing was held on the ordinance amendment, expressing concern about arbitrarily restricting private construction projects and exempting public projects; there being lack of evidence of a problem; and noise thresholds. City Council Decision on Proposed Noise Ordinance. The Council did not ultimately approve the proposed Noise Control Ordinance Amendment. The ordinance amendment was not approved by a vote of 2-2-1. Amendment Still Needed. Council discussed the noise ordinance at their March work session. Feedback after the meeting indicated that an amendment to the ordinance is still needed, as the ordinance is rather strict and only exempts construction activity and outdoor implements. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: What changes should be made to the City's Noise Control Ordinance? PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Staff has provided the Council with the City's Noise Control Ordinance along with other City Noise Ordinance examples. Staff has proposed the following amendments to the City's Noise Ordinance: Measurement of Noise. Staff is proposing replacing the table in Section 130.46: Measurement of Noise with the following table, which outlines standards set forth by Minn. Administrative Rules Ch. 7030 Noise Area Classification 1 (Residential housing, religious activities, camping and picknicking areas, health services, hotels, educational services.) 2 (Retail, business and government services, recreational activities, transit passenger terminals.) 3 (Manufacturing, fairgrounds and amusement parks, agricultural and forestry activities.) 60 65 50 55 65 70 65 70 75 80 75 80 Nighttime is defined as the hours between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. and Daytime is defined as the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The "L" measurements in the table signify the time during a one -hour period of monitoring that decibel level can occur; L10-10% of that time (6 minutes) and L50=50% of that time (30 minutes). * There is a land use classification 4: Undeveloped and unused land, water areas, under construction. These land use activities are not regulated in the table above. " Noise Emission Reference Levels and Usage Factors is attached, giving examples of noise producers at various decibel levels. Analysis. These standards are set forth by Minn. Administrative Rules. These standards are not much different than the standards that are currently within the ordinance, but replacing the current standards with these standards will obtain consistency with Minn. Administrative Rules. Construction Equipment. The current City Noise Control Ordinance exempts certain construction activity from the noise level standards outlined in the table of Section 130.46. Limited Hours. This exempted construction activity is limited to weekday hours of 7:00am to 6:00pin. o Proposed Amendment. Other cities generally allow much more extended hours of construction activity during the weekdays (all other cities researched allow construction activity to take place from 7:00am to 7:00pm, 9:00pm or 10:00pm). Extending these hours from 7:00am to 7:00pm would allow a 12 hour workday for construction activity, which Staff finds reasonable, Additionally, many cities allow Saturday construction, whereas the City of Lake Elmo does not. Staff proposes that the City allow construction activity on Saturdays from the hours of 8:00aw to 6:00pm. Many cities allow much more extended hours on Saturdays than this (6:00am, 7:00am, 8:00am, or 9:00am to 5:00pm, 6:OOpm, 7:00pm, 9:00pm, or 10:00pm). Staff believes this is reasonable and will allow projects to be completed in a timelier manner, thus shortening the amount of time a project creates construction noise. Emergency Situation. The current ordinance allows special pennits to be granted in the event of an emergency situation. Such permits may be granted during any hour of any clay, not to exceed 3 days, and may be renewed while the emergency continues. o Analysis. Emergency situation is not defined, nor does the ordinance outline who determines what is considered an emergency situation. This was amended to allow exemptions for activities which are of urgent necessity arid in the interest of public health and safety to be granted written permission from the City Administrator to take place. Substantial Economic Loss. Currently, the ordinance allows a special permit to be granted for the operation of equipment which extends the allowed construction hours to 9:30pin on weekdays and permits construction on weekends from 1:00pm to 5:00pm, provided the construction equipment is operated 600 feet or more from any dwellings. Any hour of any day is allowed for construction equipment operated 1200 feet or more from any dwellings. o Analysis. Substantial economic loss is not defined, nor should it be a valid reason for granting such a pen -nit. The proposed amendment removes this provision and allows construction activity taking place at least 1200 feet away from any dwelling provided it does not exceed 95 decibels. Sounds of this decibel level are expected to dissipate after a distance of 1200 feet. The amendment also includes the provision that ambient noise levels must be maintained at the property line. Outdoor Implements. Implements designed for outdoor use (power lawn mower, snowblower, power hedge clipper, power saw, etc), if exceeding maximum allowable sound levels, can be operated between the hours of 7:30am to 9:00pm on weekdays and 9:00am to 9:30pm every other day. If such implements do not exceed maximum allowable sound levels, they may be operated at any time. Ancilysis. Outdoor implements, like construction equipment, will almost certainly exceed the maximum allowable sound levels. This exemption should be listed in this ordinance. Staff received the request that such implements be allowed to be operated at any time. Staff has amended the ordinance to reflect this. Other Exemption Added — Special Event. Et was clarified in the proposed amendment that special events issued a special event permit may exceed the maximum decibel levels. This was done in case the Noise Ordinance was referenced when a special event exceeds these levels. In these instances, the City Council would review the special event permit application and make a decision about modifying the noise requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: Allowing extended working hours may allow for more competitive pricing on City projects and allow more timely completion of projects to minimize disruption to Lake Ehno properties. Additionally, it will reduce Staff time drafting exemption letters for construction to take place during extended hours. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recoinmends that Council adopt Ord. 08-174 approving amendments to the City's Noise Ordinance. "Move to adopt Ord. 08-1 74 approving amendments to the City's Noise Control Ordinance." Additionally, Staff recommends that the Council adopt Resolution 2017-039 authorizing summary publication of Ord. 08-174. "Move to adopt Resolution 201 7-039 authorizing summary publication of Ord. 08-1 74." ATTACHMENTS:, • Ord. 08-174 (redlined version) • Ord. 08-174 (non-redlined version) • Summary Publication Resolution 2017-039 • Comparison table CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-174 SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Chapter 130: General Offenses; Section 47: Construction Equipment of the Lake Elmo Code of Ordinances to read the following: NOISE CONTROL § 130.45 NOISE PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful to make, continue, or cause to be made or continued, any noise in excess of the noise levels set forth unless noise is reasonably necessary to preserve life, health, safety, or property. (1997 Code, 5 1370.01) Penalty, see 5 10.99 § 130.46 MEASUREMENT OF NOISE. (A) Any activity not expressly exempted by this section which creates or produces sound regardless of frequency exceeding the ambient noise levels of the property line of any property (or if a condominium or apartment house within any adjoining apartment) by more than 6 decibels above the ambient noise levels as designated -in fC;4)14- t.oi----the. -(5°54r-R,t.incp «:!0 R-01- 44-1 1,011; Ch, or....cora3gj Commented IEB1,1; Does nut include the table sot told) in Admin. Rules but rather refer; to ten,. If these updated horn time to (III1C!, an ordinance amendment will not be necei5atv. 1 ) '.,t0,„4C+t115". 44-exfiess-at-,the4Le-&i,detvt-i4t-(iti-g,r1-€4-t4n444.44m1;--;'0",411E!aF,Ur,err.i,--ii;--a hE.),,,,44-1,Foorrii,4441 t)Ett4 for- EW (1997 Code, 5 1370.02) Penalty. see 5 10.99 § 130.47 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. puroosE,,, /hr.:. city understands that. exceodinct docibrAs above the D,Int)142rit is tic:cc:Ai:try from time to ricric in ordei to ricffoi tri f;plistiruction, and meooessary illinroyonichts within the (it_. Thci foilowinv..xoinptions from ambient levol souttines sof,cific cittrirw which such ,:ictivity rtNi-v take trlitace,', ionstor Rio IX.);;t7 uf aji$ Sec:trot- t„ shall inoon cottiiLii: tor i:,/ colter, criltios doffs, ituttip t ruck % excrty,,,iituirt, o dfs, g oiler, trhilminors.„ irmOtr?:, payerneiii„t1oaker, oo dri-v(tf s, portabki trruntiors, tiactors„, treiniiti, o rtivitr oicices oi erwiurnent tosimitar tiiivet!:, of noise, .!'()Pot Med" hUtoctudo er4Qirl :; tT,t,.:PP eizpu,teprnorit t„ht exceeds ainbiont noise tevols, (A) g;''---'et-'17:s-s-tr,34:Qtr‘t-r-ftc-4--Ptle-q-c-,,',,ir, ftdarnl edirtynottr oocra Led the purpose ot cot) uct1n4->iceedirGi, iti-nbiftra noise tiriy0st-nas Oo0orat,i2d_botwocin tho lion' s of /:00 ti,rn. to 7:00 0,nt„ on weekdays and on 5;ititrdays 'Hum 8:00 a.in, to 6i00 imn. No hoayv equipment excicierlino, ambient. noise the orooertv tine may be operated on Sundays or state ainci federat hot,i(-1,nt,,,L No equipment shall be operated at any time if the sound level from the operation exceeds 100 decibels measured along any property line.-'7Ii(oNever-7-if der4bei m0:4.100irn tel 11 ;.)t ,,t 'a I td- i')ets otk? ¥0 4,171e- 411 Yri.4 axim,;(.4 ciVf0-6 I.e. ..41,,)-lie-d-C11.414 tt:I.-t-,440--,,14-.1,-tPii,e-I.T11-01-4404 11,741'inr,-.31-1(f,d-,Ays,---Wrien,44-riy--ot-ii6,-above--r-iiiuti,-4.1f,?quipmerA-iS-44:1Fred,4 or a-14i,rpuipase ottL1er,--tihar1,-Gon-FA-Riotton-,,41te--airibt n C4).011eG4,4c,41-.WI41-C.47.41.A.C4it,.0041.0c-d€441041-911-0cititoriE-.44,-,shati,--,5e-,operat_ed-,.-at,,,aiw--tcrne t-f{-Y4:0-41-444";-4:4?, 4-f r-o4-44--a44y 471G1,17.€--ed. (d) 4riy-fiorsori-iitill-ess-attowed,a,drittnal--tiotifs-ot-eot4pmeri-t tOCI Of---4.11E-4,74.)i)rtic-tiof1 l+plsn *id 01,,S 64 36y which 1i1:/10illinis1zi)t0 Cod are or' tl inletSt 15 AbtiC t'e:;ath a10 n.;:rerr.',,,,./ may be granted by 501100, ..ezz Commented 1E8211 Nu longerrelevant since above table hs been removed. Should refer to Minn. Admin. Rules Commented LEB3I: Clarifies that construction activity may exceed noise levels set forth by Minn. Admin, Rules, Commented [UM]: Adds definitiore, for clarification. Commented [EB511: Amends the time wrist, WC non activity is allowed hoot only 7ane6prit on weekdays to 7ane7pin on weekdays and tiarre6pni on Saturday:, / Commented (UM]: This ,.eillence is confusing and / outdated, as the previous ordinance was adopted in 1.99 and so Ittew rides no longer imply. If the Council wishes to den ease the maximum decibels allowed to reva'aire along the properly line, it may amend the num1.10r front 100 to a different itumbitiFor refoience, this 0. the sound id a handheld Mill being opeiated. .- Commented 1E87]; This sentence is redundant.. It all isitf says above that no equipment shall be operated at any time if the sound level from operation exceurt, 100 decibels measured along any property inc Commented [EBB): 1111.5 Section does not define what an emergency situation is or what substantial economic lov, 15 It would he mire clear to define that the City Adminearator may determine if a situation is of urgent neceNsity and in the in1111011 of public health and safely for the operation during any hour of any day for a period not to exceed 3 days or less while the emergency continues. d.Otto Ildoolo:oori may be renewed for periods of 3 days or less while the emergency continues. ..c,P..)--(2.21 fi.l4e ef.fitifitirltifit.ffitriirtf.out,tsto,Fit tOtt eiii),t(thiceitii)) .3- tat)tait. tit9i(it; Vf)1Y fi,t+ A 1.4 /4;4,10 ttaititeirilefiyitetteiti it).-)Atet)...((t.teleiet1 f ettile.tiiteatitlitiattiefati())ettitritrif fa fj4.0 atatratfittaiiiiiitittrei“ t): )"..tre o.t;t:t4rt4;;40... 4:r e:o.q.bstiri:i,irq irtrtttor.,,roto.r;t. ,itto i t.? roi.tto,o tt.t.t1s3t tit,ito t:ttp.o.ittottooto Orfet.tritr4 rorttrotrttol io,rto toot-t cq.:,;ortt"..t.ttios.o :Itr:tor;i.o.on ‘AttiOttttr, t'o,toktt,ttior114:...)t. it!): toritjt,rttttry. of t.itl P.0 14200, feet in any direction from any_clweltingf,14-pe,4)4it may fhe :0 granted bv for operation during any hour of any day. A rnbit,;:nt. noise S 130.48 OUTDOOR IMPLEMENT. (A) (7,...x:ceol -Fy,:,..g;4..treQ-, a pt tr.c1c.,,of trr41,:t" Any power lawn mower, snowblower, power hedge clipper, power saw Teo, ty• 447,4441,',/ 7))„.1,, 13.2 (i)).0)1 wee,11-,t44? toCIO4I-Orttterit- ao,19 SPECIAL. EVENT ti"ief? fit)(1 'tip:rift) ftili ()it( 5)vie,,,1 C111d H)t tc.,csti or cteatt,.. ntosLmc E..: Or dittott,' barh o to 1 lot otoortt: 'ookl.idottquiltiLti of t oftittono, SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-174 was adopted on this day of , 2017, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Commented [E.B9]: Substantial economic loss is difficult to determine and could be argued by many, Commented [03101: PilliSC Ot a level of tri decibels IN expected In dissipate 'Ater a distance of 1200 feet, Commented [EB11J: CIatifies that such activity needs written pet rnivaon inorn the City Administirdtoi in order to be approved. Commented 1E8121: it was rennected that outdoor implements be allowed to be operated at any time, --a' Commented 1E8131: fli n language used (loin the Special Neat; Permit ordinaace It was added to powl 01/1 within the Noise Ordinance that special events may inneed 1110.11MM-11 clecahilti in case the Iloiwf iliaancei h., referenced when a spatial etatia 5 eitkfteiliait Illatlmum decibel level Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-174 was published on the day of . 2017. CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-174 SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Chapter 130: General Offenses; Sections 130.45-130.48 of the Lake Elmo Code of Ordinances to read the following: NOISE CONTROL 5 130.45 NOISE PROHIBITED. It shall be unlawful to make, continue, or cause to be made or continued, any noise in excess of the noise levels set forth unless noise is reasonably necessary to preserve life, health, safety, or property. (1997 Code, § 1370.01) Penalty, see § 10.99 § 130.46 MEASUREMENT OF NOISE. (A) Any activity not expressly exempted by this section which creates or produces sound regardless of frequency exceeding the ambient noise levels of the property line of any property (or if a condominium or apartment house within any adjoining apartment) by more than 6 decibels above the ambient noise levels as designated by Minn. Rules Ch. 7030. (1997 Code, 5 1370.02) Penalty, see 5 10.99 5 130.47 CONSTRUCTION EQUIPMENT. Purpose. The City understands that exceeding decibels above the ambient noise level is necessary from time to time in order to perform construction and make necessary improvements within the City. The following exemptions from ambient noise levels outlines specific times during which such activity may take place. Definitions, for the Purpose of this Section. "Heavy equipment" shall mean compactors/rollers, cranes, dozers, dump trucks, excavators, forklifts, graders, jackhammers, loaders, pavement breakers, pile drivers, portable crushers, tractors, trenchers, or other pieces of equipment that generate similar levels of noise. "Operated" shall include engine start-up or warm-up, or any activity involving heavy equipment that exceeds ambient noise levels. (A) Heavy equipment operated the purpose of construction exceeding ambient noise levels may be operated between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. on weekdays and on Saturdays from 8:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. No heavy equipment exceeding ambient noise levels at the property line may be operated on Sundays or state and federal holidays. No equipment shall be operated at any time if the sound Level from the operation exceeds 100 decibels measured along any property line. (B) An exemption for activities which the City Administrator find are of urgent necessity and in the interest of public health and safety may be granted by written permission for the operation during any hour of any day for a period not to exceed 3 days or less while the emergency continues. Written permission may be renewed for periods of 3 days or less while the emergency continues. (C) Construction activity involving operation of equipment producing a sound level of up to 95 decibels that takes place no less than 1,200 feet in any direction from any dwelling may be allowed, through written permission granted by the City Administrator, for operation during any hour of any day. Ambient noise levels must be maintained at the property line. § 130.48 OUTDOOR IMPLEMENT. (A) Outdoor implements designed primarily for outdoor use, including but not limited to any power lawn mower, snowblower, power hedge clipper, power saw may be operated at any time. § 130.49 SPECIAL EVENT (A) Activities which are issued a special event permit may exceed the maximum - allowed decibel level provided sound is not unreasonably loud or creates a nuisance or disturbance to the peace and tranquility of the citizens. SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-174 was adopted on this day of , 2017, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor Al I EST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-174 was published on the day of , 2017. CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-039 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 08-174 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-174, an ordinance to amend the City's Noise Ordinance; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is lengthy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes. section 412.191, subd. 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. 08-174 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-174, which amends Chapter 130: General Offenses, Sections 130.45-130.48: Noise Control. The revised ordinance amends the standards as follows: Adopts Noise Area Classification Table set forth in Minn. Administrative Rules Ch. 7030. • Allows the operation of heavy equipment for the purpose of construction on Saturdays from 8:00am — 6:00pm and weekdays from 7:00am to 7:00pin (not including state and federal holidays). • A special permit may no longer be granted in the event of a determination of substantial economic loss. • Exemptions may be granted to allow construction activity that is determined by the City Administrator to be of urgent necessity and in the interest of public health and safety. • Outdoor implements may be operated at any time. The full text of Ordinance No. 08-174 is available for inspection at Lake Elmo city hall during regular business hours. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo that the City Administrator keep a copy of the ordinance at City Hall for public inspection and that a full Resolution 2017-039 Page 1 of 2 copy of the ordinance be placed in a public location within the City. Dated: May 2, 2017 ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor Mike Pearson The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution 2017-039 Page 2 of 2 Construction/Outdoor Equipment Noise Regulations 12/11/14 Construction Construction Domestic Outdoor Domestic Outdoor Refuse City Weekdays Weekends/Holidays Equip -Weekdays Equip - Ends/Holida Hauling Lake Elmo 7 am - 6 pm Woodbury 6 am - 10 pm Oakdale 7 am • 7 pm Shoreview 7 am - 9 pm Plymouth 7 am - 10 pm Richfield 7 am • 10 pm Rosemount 7 am - 10 prn Crystal 7 am - 10 pm Minnetonka 7 am - 10 pm Coon Rapids 7 am - 10 pm Maple Grove 7 am - 9 prn Blaine 7 arn - 10 pm Minnetrista 7 am - 7 prn Cottage Grove 7 am - 7 pm Lino Lakes 7 am - 7 pm Champlain 7 am - 9 pm Apple Valley 6 am - 10 pm Chanhassen 7 am - 9 pm None 6 am - 10 pm 9 am - 5 prn Sat only 8 am - 9 pm am - 9 prn 8 am - 10 pm Sat 7a-7p Sat 9e-5p Sun 9 am - 9 pm 7 am - 10 pm 7 am - 10 pm Sat 8 am • 9 pm 7 am - 10 pm 8 am - 6 prn Sat 9 am -7 pm Sat only 9 am - 5 pm Sat only 7 am - 9 pm 6 am - 10 pm 9 am - 9 pm Sat only 730 am - 9 pm 6 am - 10 pm Not addressed 8 am - 10 pm all 7 am- 10 pm 7 am - 10 pm Not addressed Same as Const 7 am - 10 pm Not addressed Same as Const Same as Const Not addressed 7 am - 10 pm Resident Exempt Not addressed 6 am - 10 pm 7 am - 9 pm 9 arn - 9 pm 6 am - 10 pm Not addressed 8 am - 10 pm all 8 am 9 pm 8 am - 10 pm Not addressed same as const 7 am - 10 pm Not addressed sarne as const same as const Not addressed 8 am- 9 pm Resident Exempt Not addressed 6 am- 10 pm 8 am - 7 pm Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed 6 am -6 pm M-Sat Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed 6 am - 6 pm all Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Not Addressed Exceptions Yes - via special permit City or State Authorized for safety (snow removal) None Snow removal exempt None Snowblowers 6a-10p any; 7a-l0p daily if under 85dBA Ernergencies where the City has granted approval Emergencies, snow and storms None By special permit None City or State Authorized for safety (snow removal) None None None Urgent Necessity the City may grant except on Emergency Work, snow removal and street sweeping Snow Removal, Excavation & Grading, outdoor recreation and emergencies. Bug Zappers - 9am - 9pm all days ( :rim: or, LAKE ELMO STAFF REPORT DATE: 5/2/20 I 7 REGULAR ITEM #: 9 MOTION TO: City Council FROM: Emily Becker, City Planner AGENDA ITEM: Easton Village rd Addition Final Plat REVIEWED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director BACKGROUND: The City has received a Final Plat application from Chase Development for the rd Addition of Easton Village, a 217 unit residential subdivision. The 2'd Addition includes 19 single family lots that are located within 5.2 acres on the eastern portion of the subdivision and extended above the northern boundary of the 1 Addition. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending approval of the request subject to conditions listed in this report. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: The Council should determine if the proposed Final Plat is generally consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat and either approve or deny the Final Plat application. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS; Consistency with Preliminary Plat. The proposed Final P1at is generally consistent with the approved Preliminary Plat with the following exceptions: Missing Trail Connection. The Preliminary Plat was approved with a number of conditions, one of which was that the Applicant provide a trail connection connecting the cul-de-sac bulb to the trail along Village Parkway. The Applicant has proposed removing this trail because of desire for wider lots to accommodate a variety of housing styles and because generally customers who purchase homes on cul-de-sacs do so because of added security and privacy they provide for fami lies. No Parkland. Because of the missing trail connection outlined above, the 2ld Addition proposes no dedicated parkland, and the Applicant will be required to pay a fee in lieu of parkland dedication, The overall development 9.84 acres of parkland, and the Is' Addition dedicated 3.99 acres. The Developers Agreement will determine the required parkland dedication fee for the 2n6 Addition, Increased Number of Lots. The approved Preliminary Plat designated 18 units in this addition, and the Applicant has proposed to increase this number to 19 units. o Revised Preliminary Plat. The Applicant has submitted a revised Preliminary Plat that shows that the total number of lots throughout the entire Easton Village development will remain 217 units, leaving the overall density unchanged. It is a recommended condition of approval that the Applicant submit the revised Preliminaiy Plat and Plans for Staff approval prior to accepting applications for future phases of the development for Final Plat. City Council Meeting 5/2/2017 Regular Agenda item #9 • Landscape Plans. The Applicant's Landscape Plans are not consistent with the approved Preliminary Landscape Plans and will need to be updated and approved by City Staff before the Final Plat may be recorded. • Construction Plans and Permits. The Applicant will need to update all construction plans according to the City Engineer Review Memo dated April 17, 2017 and obtain approval prior to recording of Final Plat as well as obtain all necessary City and jurisdictional permits. Planning Commission Review. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Easton Village 2' Addition Final Plat at its April 24, 2017 meeting. The Planning Commission recommended approval of the proposed Final Plat with an affirmative vote of 6-1. Comments in the affirmative were as follows: • The removal of the trail is insignificant, as the trail location on the side yards of the two lots reduces privacy, and the trai] does not provide connection for a large number of lots. Dissenting comments were as follows: • The trail should not be removed, as it provides connectivity and it does not decrease privacy, as the smaller lots and large houses in and of themselves provide little privacy. Revised Recommended Findings of Fact and Recommended Conditions, • Finding of Fact Amended. Upon its review, Planning Commission making the following amendment to the Findings of Fact outlined in the Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated April 24, 2017: o 2) That the proposed Final Plat for Easton Village consists of the creation of 19 single- family detached residential structures: and the elimination of the trail from the cul-de-sac Lo Village Parkway. • Condition Added. Additionally, Staff recommended that the following condition be added to the conditions outlined in the Staff Report dated April 24, 2017: o 10) That the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plans be revised and a r ved y_the City ce nga 'cations for future phases of the development for Final Plat. FISCAL IMPACT: The Developer Agreement associated with this Addition will further delineate financial impact. OPTIONS: The Council may: • Approve the Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat with the recommended conditions of approval. • Approve the Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat with amended conditions of approval. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the Council approve the Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat with the recommended conditions of approval with the following motion: "Move to adopt Resolution 2017-040 approving the Easton Village 2"4 Addition Final Plat with the 10 recommended conditions of approval." ATTACHMENTS: Page 2 City Council Meeting 5/2/2017 Regular Agenda item #S ^ Easton Village 2wAddition Final Plat kunofthe 4/24/20l7Planning Commission Meeting Packet ° 4/24/2O|7Planning Commission Meeting Minutes pertaining toEaston Village 2ndAddition Final 9|ut Resolution 2014-040 Page I ( I t TO: FROM: Emily Becker, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director Jack Griffin, City Engineer STAFF REPORT DATE: 4/24/2017 BUSINESS ITEM ITEM #: 5A CASE # 2017-01 MOTION Easton Village 2" Addition Final P1at BACKGROUND: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Final Plat request from Chase Development for the 2" Addition of Easton Village, a planned 217 unit residential development. The 2" Addition includes 19 single family lots that are located within 5.2 acres on the eastern portion of the subdivision and extended above the northern boundary of the 1Addition. Staff is recommending approval of the request subject to conditions listed in this report. ISSUE BEFORE COMMISSION: The Commission is being asked to recommend approval or denial of the Final Plat request for the 2" Addition of Easton Village based on its consistency with the approved Preliminary Plat. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: General Information. Applicant: Chase Development, 2140 West County Road 42, Burnsville, MN Property Oirners: Easton Village, LLC (Tom Wolter) 2140 West County Road 42, Burnsville, MN Location: Section 12 & 13, Township 29 North, Range 21 West in Lake Elmo, north of 30th Street, west of Manning Avenue, and south of the Union Pacific railroad right-of-way. Part of Outlot F, Easton Village, Washington County, Minnesota. PID Number 13.029.21.42.0025. Request: Application for final plat approval of a 19 unit residential subdivision to be named Easton Village. Zoning: LDR — Limited Density Residential Surrounding: North — vacant/agricultural land (RT — Rural Transitional); West — single family home, City park, natural vegetation (PF — Public and Quasi Public Open Space; South — vacant land (LDR — Limited Density Residential); East — Lake Elmo Airport (Baytown Township). COM ). Pion Village Urban Low Density Residential (1.5 - 2.49 units per acre) BUS INESS ITEM 5a History: Property was included in Village Planning Area boundary and municipal sewer service area as defined in the 2013 Village Land Use Plan. Site has historically been used for faming activities, including the growing of agricultural crops. Sketch Plan review by Planning Commission on 1/27/14 with Preliminary Plat approval on July 15, 2014. An AUAR for the Village Plarming area was approved by the City in May of 2009. Action Deadline: Application Complete — 3/22/2017 60 Day Deadline — 5/21/2017 Extension Letter Mailed — N/A 120 Day Deadline — N/A Regulations: Chapter 153 — Subdivision Regulations Article XII — Urban Residential Districts (LDR) §150.270 Storni Water, Erosion, and Sediment Control Consistency with Preliminary Plat. Previously Revised Preliminary Plat. Prior to the 1 Addition Final Plat approval, the approved Preliminary Plat was revised in December of 2014 to address the following: • The need to reconfigure the temporary access into the subdivision. • Revisions to the grading plan. • Adjustments to the properly boundaries adjacent to the gas line that bisects the site. • The provision of a slightly larger buffer from the railroad tracks. • Revisions to the storni water management plan. The 2' Addition Final Plat application was compared against h e revised Preliminary Plans (December, 2014). Increased Number of Lots. The revised Preliminary Plat did not significantly change the lot configuration or density of the 2" Addition. However, the number of lots as proposed in the 2" Addition Final Plat was increased by 1. • # of lots in area proposed as 2" Addition in approved and revised Preliminary Plat: 18 • # of lots in proposed 2" Addition Final Plat: 19 Preliminary Plat Revision #2. Staff has requested that the applicant submit another revised preliminary plat that will show how future phases will offset the density increase proposed for the 2" and 3" Additions. Application for Easton Village 3' Addition was submitted with the 2" Addition final plat, but was deemed incomplete. The 3" Addition proposes two additional lots than proposed in the December 2014 preliminary plat. The revised preliminary plat is attached. Decreased Lot Sizes. The table below shows the lot sizes in the area proposed as 2" Addition in the December 2014 Preliminary- Plat as compared to the proposed 2" Addition Final Plat: Lot Block Revised Preliminary Plat Final Plat 1 1 3 10,043 9,817 8,450 9,091 8,450 9,750 BUSINESS ITEM 5a 4 1 10,187 9,267 5 1 11,923 8,673 6 1 10,736 7 1 10,905 8,310 8 1 9,458 10,292 9 1 11,638 9,592 10 1 8,925 8,145 11 1 8,354 8,917 12 11 8,450 9,116 13 1 8,450 8,455 14 1 10,468 11,089 1 2 9,750 8,890 2 2 8,266 8,658 3 2 8,688 8,020 4 2 8,687 9,942 5 2 8,907 10,463 Area of PVetlands and Bt(ffers: None proposed. Final Area of Dedicated of (Non -Arterial) Right -of: Way: 1.136 Outlots. There are no outlots as part of this plat. Engineering Comments. Attached is the City Engineer review letter dated April 12, 2017. Summarily, the construction plans will need to be updated according to these comments, and construction may not begin until the Applicant has obtained approval for the Final Construction Plans. Easements. rd Addition plats a portion of Outlot F of Easton Village 15` Addition. This Outlot has three easements recorded against it, a permanent easement for drainage and utility purposes, and a temporary access easement which terminates upon replatting of Outlot F and a temporary construction easement which terminates after a one year warranty period after completion of installing the public and utility and drainageway. Temporary Cul-de-Sac. The Applicant is proposing a temporary cul-de-sac off of Linden Avenue North. It is a recommended condition of approval that the Applicant provide a temporary road easement over this cul-de-sac. Parkland. Missing Trail. The Preliminary Plat was approved on the condition that a trail be constructed between Lots 13 and 14 of Block 3 as shown on the December 2014 Preliminary Plat as presented to the Planning Commission on January 16, 2015. This was a Staff recommended condition based on Sketch Plan review at the City Council. The Sketch Plan included this trail connection. Council had BUSINESS ITEM 5a 4 expressed concerned about the walkability of the neighborhood as a result of the many cul-de-sacs within the neighborhood. According to meeting minutes, the Parks Commission did not make reconunendation to add this specific condition but rather was concerned about the walkability of the neighborhood. In the 2" Addition application narrative and during meetings with Staff, the applicant has stated that the trail connection shown on the Preliminary Plat has been eliminated because they have found that customers who purchase cul-de-sac lots generally do so because of the added security and privacy they provide for families. Additionally, the Applicant has stated that the elimination of the cul-de-sac would help facilitate the design of wider lots and a mixture of lots to create more variety and options for builders. The Parks Commission reviewed the 2" Addition Final Plat at its April 17, 2017 meeting, and they did not see it necessary for this connection to be kept, as it does not provide overall connectivity from the development to the Village or other areas of the City. The Commission should consider whether or not the trail and outlot can be reinoved as proposed. Parkland Dedication. No parks or open space are proposed with the 2' Addition, however, 3.99 acres of parkland was dedicated with the 1 Addition. As mentioned above, the revised Preliminary Plat showed a 0.07 acre trail outlot for which the developer would have received dedication credit for in this phase of the development. The approved Developer Agreement of the 1st Addition states that the developer shall be required to dedicate 9.84 acres of land for public park purposes for the entire subdivision, and the 1' Addition provided 3.99 acres of land. The future project phases were to either dedicate the remaining 5.85 acres of park land or cash payment in lieu of dedication. If the removed trail connection is approved, no parkland dedication credit will be given towards this phase, and the developer should be required to pay a parkland dedication fee for the value of 0.52 acres of land for this phase (10% of the acreage of the Final Plat area of 5.2 acres). An assessment has not been done on the value of this land, and this will need to done prior to approval of the Developer Agreement. The Developer Agreement will outline the determined amount the developer is to pay. Updated Preliminary Plans. The Applicant has updated Preliminary Plans in order to show how changes made to both 2" and 3rd Additions since the previously approved Preliminary Plans submitted December of 2014 will work. These Preliminary Plans have been reviewed and approved by the City Engineer. Village Parkway Extended. The Applicant has shown Village Parkway extended all the way adjacent to 2"(1 Addition. While access to 2nd Addition will not be provided by Village Parkway, it is city policy that all public improvements that are adjacent to any proposed lots be included in the Plat and constructed as part of the Plat improvements. The main reasoning behind this is so that potential buyers of homes on these lots are aware that a road will be constructed adjacent to their lots. Landscape Plans. The applicant is proposing 19 trees within the 2' Addition, which is not consistent with updated Preliminary Landscape Plans. • The Applicant submitted updated Preliminary Landscape Plans along with application for 1st Addition Final Plat, dated 12/17/2014 in response to comments provided by the City's Landscape Architect in a review letter dated 12/3/2014. • The Applicant has not shown in the Landscape Plans landscaping along the extension of Village Parkway. The Landscape Plans will need to be updated to include these plantings. BUSINESS ITEM 5a 5 • The Applicant is proposing Scarlet Jewel Maples and Redmond Linden where some Autumn Blaze Maples were proposed on the Preliminary Plan, and tree placement is a bit different than provided in the Preliminary Plan, as shown below for comparison. • The Landscape Plan does not include utility locations. The Plans will need to be updated to include this. • The Preliminary Landscape Plan Review letter dated December 2, 2014 required that landscape irrigation plans be provided for all commonly held HOA & City Outlots/ROW areas. While there are no commonly held HOA or City Oulots within the 2"1 Addition, the irrigation plans will need to be provided for the ROW area along Village Parkway when this is included in the updated Landscape Plans. • A Landscape Maintenance Agreement will need to be provided for all City ROW areas. Street Naming. The proposed street names are consistent with Lake Elmo's Street Naming Policy. While there is a Linden Avenue North in the Sanctuary Development, Easton Village 151 Addition Final Plat was approved with the name of Linden Avenue North, and the Linden Avenue in 2nd Addition is a direct extension of the Linden Avenue of 151 Addition. Village Parkway. Staff is considering/exploring some changes to the Village Parkway design to allow tree planting between the trail/sidewalk and the street, to eliminate the irrigation requirement, changing the turfgrass sod to salt tolerant sod or no -mow, and potentially modifying the soil requirements to support plant establishment without irrigation. Final Plat Approval Process. The City's subdivision ordinance establishes the procedure for obtaining final subdivision approval, in which case a final plat may only be reviewed atler the City takes action on a preliminary plat. As long as the final plat is consistent with the preliminary approval, it must be approved by the City. Please note that the City's approval of the Easton Village Preliminary Plat did include a series of conditions that must be met by the applicant, which are addressed in the "Review and Analysis" section below. There are no public hearing requirements for a final plat. In order to provide the Planning Commission with an update concerning the conditions associated with the preliminary plat for Easton Village, Staff has prepared the following: Preliminary Plat Conditions — With Staff Update Comments (updated information in bold italics): 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall complete the following: a) the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney; and b) the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat. The above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. Comments: a) all title work will need to be submitted and reviewed by the City Attorney before City officials sign the final plat; b) the applicant has submitted an escrow payment with Final Plat application that is being used to cover Staffand consultant expenses related to the City's review. 2) The grading plan shall be updated to include the protective tree fencing necessary to preserve all vegetative areas identified for protection around the 5.15 acre residential parcel to the west of the subdivision. Continents: The grading plan has been updated accordingly. All disturbed areas BUSINESS ITEM 5a 6 are shown on the plan, and the applicant will need to replace disturbed tress in accordance with the City's tree replacement schedule. 3) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Manning Avenue. Comments: The proposed Manning Avenue right-of-way is consistent with County requirements, as the planned roadway segment includes room for trails on one or both sides of the right-of-way. The Cou,,ti' 'sfufiire plans for Manning Avenue include a trail along the western side of this road. 4) The applicant shall submit a landscape plan prepared by landscape architect for review and approval by the City. The landscape plan submittal will include a tree protection and replacement plan consistent with City ordinances. Comments: The applicant submitted updated Preliminary Landscape Plans dated 12/17/2014 with the application for IAddition Final Plat. The 2"d Addition landscape plans are incomplete and will need to be revised for City review and approval. 5) The final plat will incorporate all review comments from the City's landscape architect, including the selection and mix of plantings within storm water basins and infiltration areas. Contments: Please see above condition. 6) The landscape plan shall include additional plantings around the Northern Natural Gas utility site. Comments: This condition is not relevant to the 2"d Addition Final Plat as there is no gas easement in this portion of the development. 7) The proposed access to Manning Avenue will be permitted as a temporary access until such time that the Village Parkway is connected to 30th Street. The construction plans will be updated to reflect the temporary nature of this street. Comments: The applicant asked during the Pr Addition Final Plat that this provision be updated to state that the temporary access will be allowed for a minimum offive years. Staff was supportive of this revision and has updated the proposed conditions the P' Addition Final Plat approval to reflect the change. This condition is not relevant to the 2" Addition Final Plat. 8) The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated June 24, 2014. The final construction plans for the I" Addition were updated to incorporate the required improvements to Manning Avenue. This condition is not relevant to the 2" Addition final plat. 9) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed pen -nits from the appropriate watershed districts for the storm water management system prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. Comments: Because the Valley Branch Watershed District has not yet completed its review of the revised storm water plans, this condition will need to be addressed before the City will grant final approval of the construction plans. This has been added as a condition of approval of Final Plat. 10) The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public BUSINESS ITEM 5a 7 park and open space on the final plat. Comment: A Landscape License Agreement was executed for the I" Addition and another one will be executed after the approval of 2"d Addition. 11) The developer shall provide an updated accounting of the land to be dedicated for park purposes prior to submission of a final plat. If required, the developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall he paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. Comments: The park dedication requirements for the entire Easton Village development is 9.84 acres of land, representing 10% of the development area. During the 1" Addition Final Plat, the applicant provided an accounting of the land to be dedicated for park purposes, stating that the entire development will provide 7.29 acres of public park land. Staff had reviewed these numbers with the P' Addition Final Plat application and found them to be accurate. However, this number )vill be amended if Council approves the elimination of the trail/outlot within the 2"d Addition Final Plat. The final agreement with the City concerning either a cash payment for the park land shortfall or future land dedication should be addressed in the developer's agreement for Easton Village 2" Addition. 12) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. Comments: The Applicant has not proposed any trails in this Addition. If it is determined that the trail connection between what is now being proposed as Lot 7 and 8 of Block 1 (referred to in the Preliminary, Plat conditions as Lot 13 and 14 of Block 3), this condition will apply. 13) All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated June 26, 2014 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Comments. The preliminary plat and plans have been updated to address the City Engineer's review comments. The Engineer has submitted an updated report specific to the final plat, and this review is attached for consideration by the Planning Commission. Most of the comments pertain to final information or revisions necessaty to approve the construction plans for the proposed improvements. 14) The City and developer will determine the appropriate distribution of future costs associated with the Village Parkway railroad crossing improvements as part of a developer's agreement for any portion of Easton Village. Comntents: Staff will be drafting a developer's agreement for consideration by the Council that will incorporate a section dealing with this provision. 15) The developer shall address any comments from Metropolitan Airport Commission as part of a final plat submission for any portion of Easton Village. MAC will be asked to comment on the landscape plan, and the plan shall be revised to address any specific comments concerning the appropriate vegetation to be planted within storm water facilities. Comments: MAC has provided a review of the updated plans and provided comments to the developer in a letter dated December 8, 2015. This letter contains recommended mitigation strategies to reduce the attractiveness of the storm water retention and infiltration areas ,aterfowl. Other recommendations from MAC have been incorporated into the applicant ' • landscape plans. Mac's comments are not relevant to the 2" Addition Final Plat. BUSINESS ITEM 5a 16) The landscape plan shall be revised to eliminate all trees planted within the Lake Ehno Airport Regulatory Protection Zone, Comments. The Preliminary and Addition landscape plans have been updated accordingly. MAC's comments are not relevant to the 2"' Addition Final Plat. 17) The final plat shall include a paved trail connection between Lots 13 and 14 of Block 3. Comments: The Applicant is proposing eliminating this trail connections, for reasons cited herein. 18) The applicant shall submit written acknowledgement from the property owner of the parcel immediately to the south of Easton Village concerning the storm water being outlet running into their property. Comments: Since the approval of the preliminary plat, the applicant has met with the watershed district, county, and Gonyea Homes to discuss the proposed storm water management system along II/fanning Avenue. This condition is not relevant to the 2" Addition Final Plat. 19) The applicant is encouraged to incorporate elements from the Lake Elmo Therning Study into the open space areas within the subdivision. Comments: This was Staff recommendation at the tune of Preliminag Plat to encourage the applicant to utilize a white "horse fence" with landscaping in order to address the comments rom MAC to provide a barrier around the storm water ponds. This fence was not erected, but instead additional landscaping was installed to provide screening. The applicant's landscape plan for the V' Addition incorporated elements from the (heming study, including the proposed entrance monument sign. 20) The developer shall obtain all required permits from Northern Natural Gas to perform construction work over the gas line that runs from north to south across this site. Comments. Northern Natural Gas provided review comments to the developer in August of 2014, and these comments have been incorporated into the updated plans. The developer will need to submit the final construction plans to the gas company for review, and will need to abide by any conditions imposed by Northern Natural Gas. This has been added as a condition of approval. There are no impacts to this easement in the 2m! Addition. 21) The developer shall be required to extend sewer to the northernmost boundary of the site. Comments. The Easton Village Trunk Sewer Line project has been completed and has extended sanitary sewer service to the northern boundary of the plat, connecting to the sewer line recently installed by the City of Lake Elmo under the railroad tracks that continues fiirther north (and connects to the 39111 Street line also recently installed by the City). Staff is recommendingrecornmending certain conditions that been specifically identified as part of the final plat review, and that have not otherwise been addressed by the applicant, be addressed as part of the Planning Cominission's recommendation to the City Council. The City Engineer's review letter does identify several issues that need to be addressed by the developer in order for the City to deem the final plans complete. Staff is recommending that City Officials not sign the final plat mylars until the City's construction plan review is finalized and all necessary easements are documented on the final plat. Based on the above Staff report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the final plat with several conditions intended to address the outstanding issues noted above and to further clarify the City's expectations in order for the developer to proceed with the recording of the final plat. BUSINESS ITEM 5a 9 The recommended conditions are as follows: Recomniended Conditions of Approval: 1) Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, sanitary and storm water management plans, landscape plans, and street and utility construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and applicable Staff prior to the recording of the Final Plat. All changes and modifications to the plans requested by the City Engineer in the memorandums addressing Easton Village 2' Addition Final Plat and Easton Village 2nd Addition Construction Plan Review dated April 12, 2017 in the memo shall be incorporated into these documents before they are approved. 2) Prior to the execution of the Final Plat by City officials, the Developer shall enter into a Developer's Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney and approved by the City Council that delineates who is responsible for the design, construction, and payment of the required improvements for the Easton Village 2' Addition Final Plat with financial guarantees therefore. 3) All easements as requested by the City Engineer and Public Works Department shall be documented on the Final Plat prior to its execution by City Officials. 4) The Applicant shall submit an updated Landscape Plan that is consistent with Preliminary Landscape Plans; shows utility locations; shows irrigation plans; and includes the right-of- way area along Village Parkway. The updated plans will need to be approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Landscape Maintenance Agreement will need to be provided for all City right-of-way areas. 5) Temporary easements for the temporary cul-de-sacs shall be executed and recorded on the City standard easement agreement form. 6) The applicant shall provide a disclosure statement to all first homeowners in the development advising of the airport and associated over -flights. 7) All builders shall be encouraged to incorporate interior noise reduction measures into single family residential structures within the subdivision based on the Metropolitan Council's Builder Guide. 8) The proposed access to Manning Avenue will be permitted as a temporary access until such time that the Village Parkway is connected to 30th Street or 5 years has passed from the date of final plat approval of the 1 Addition (March 23, 2020), whichever is longer. The developer's agreement for Easton Village shall include appropriate financial securities concerning the future cost for removal of the temporary access. 9) Approval by the Valley Branch Watershed District is needed for revised stonnwatcr plans. DRAFT FINDINGS BUSINESS ITEM 5a 10 Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat: 1) That all the requirements of City Code Section 153.07 related to the Final Plan and Final Plat have been met by the Applicant. 2) That the proposed Final Plat for Easton Village consists of the creation of 19 single-family detached residential structures. 3) That the Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat is generally consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Plans as approved by the City of Lake Elmo on July 15, 2014 and as amended to comply with conditions of preliminary plat approval with the exceptions of issues identified in the April 24, 2017 Staff report to the Planning Commission. 4) That the Easton Village 2" Addition Final Plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 5) That the Easton Village .2"d Addition Final Plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential zoning district regulations. 6) That the Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm 1vater, sediment and erosion control and other ordinances with the exception of issues identified in the April 24, 2017 Staff report to the Planning Commission. 7) That the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. 8) That the Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat is generally consistent with the City's engineering standards with the exception of necessary plan revisions outlined by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated April 12, 2017. RECCONIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the 2"d Addition Final Plat for Easton Village with the 9 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Easton Village 2"d Addition .Final Plat with the 9 conditions of approval as drafted by Staff" ATTACHMENTS: 1. Application Form 2. City Engineer Review Letters 3. Updated Preliminary Plans dated 12/17/2014 4. Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat and Plans 5. Revised Preliminary Plans BUSINESS ITEM 5a 11 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction............ ........ ..... ....................... ..... ...............Planning Staff - Report by Staff.... ........ ........... ..... ....... ...............................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission ...... ....Chair & Commission Members Open the Public Hearing ...... ..... .......... ....... ...... ..... ...... ........ .......Chair Closethe Public Hearing............ ............. ..................... .......... . .......... ...... ...Chair - Discussion by the Commission ....... ........ . Chair & Commission Members - Action by the Con-unission.............................. ........ Chair & Commission Members BUSINESS ITEM 5a Date Received: Received By. LU File #: THE (-Try ol, LAKE ELMO 651-747-3900 3800 Laveme Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 FINAL PLAT APPLICATION Applicant: C ko,5e_ De_c/K lo Address: d, I 4 West C,•: R.,,J Phone #: 004/ Email Address: i;r, bor CceST ( C0,1/1 Fee Owner: 4.0-Th V:114, Address: ap-10 4), Phone #: c15,2, Email Address: i; 6cc CrcSt ‹,"y,y 1. ( 0 rki Property Location (Address): Complete (long) Legal Description: 00i- b 1 Ls+cr, 0,115,f PID#: i3 (5;-6) General information of proposed subdivision: In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning Ordinance and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to additional application expense. -------- Signature of applicant: 7e- • Fee Owner Signature Date: Date: /*'? i—A) /6 Revised 7120/2016 11:20 AM EASTON VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION FINAL PLAT WRITTEN STATEMENTS January 14, 2017 A) PROJECT CONTACTS: OWNER: Tom Wolter Easton Village, LLC 2140 County Road 42 West Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: 952-292-0046 timbercrest@yrnail.com AUTHORIZED AGENT: Project Contact/Engineer: Todd A. Erickson, PE EricksonCivil 333 North Main Street, Suite 201 Stillwater, MN 55082 Phone: 612-309-3804 todd@tericksonllc.com Surveyor: Paul A. Johnson, LS, EricksonCivil Landscape Architect: David Chmielewski, LA, EricksonCivil DEVELOPER: Tom Wolter Chase Development 2140 County Road 42 West Burnsville, MN 55337 Phone: 952-292-0046 timbercrest@ymail.com EASTON VILLAGE 2"" ADDITION FTNALPLATWRITTEN STATEMENTS Page %m{4 B) SITE DATA: Address: No current address. 32zclinden Lane North. Current Zoning:lDf{ Parcel Size: 520Acces. 226.528 3q. Ft. Pl[}No.: 13.029.I1.42.0025 Current Legal: Part of(}uHot F. Easton Village, VVuxhi",00u County, Minnesota. See also Final Plat Dedication Page lof2. O FINAL SUBDIVISION AND LOT INFORMATION: Narne of Final Plat: Easton Village " Addition Table of Proposed Lots: Lot Block Area (Sq. RjArea (Acre) Lot Width (1) Lot Depth (2) l 1 9'817 0.225 79 130 2 1 9'091 0209 70 130 3 1 9'750 0.2241 75 130 -' 4 I 9'267 0]13 75 120 S l 8,673 0.I991 75 110 6 1 10J36 0,246 65 lZO 7 l 8'310/ 0.191 65 115 8 l 10,292 0236 65 115 ' 9 1 10,254 0235 65 llS 10 1 7/03 0.172 70 115 11 l 8,9I7 0.205 70 I25 12 1 9,116 0,209 70 130 l] 1 8/455 0194 65 13O —'— ' '- -- l4 l 11,089 0.255 70 1�U ' — — I Z 8,701 (lZUO 65 120 Z 2 8,658 0i199 70 120 ] 2 7,772 0178 65 lZO | | 4 2 10,190| O�234 70 | 120 |120 | ROAD RIGHT OFWAY TOTAL AREA DEVELOPED | / | / 49,4|94 / 1.136 226,520 | 5,200 | / (gLot width atsetback shown onplan (2)Average approximate lot length, some lots are irregular i"shape (see plan for exact dimensions) _ EASTON VILLAGE 2"d ADDITION FINAL PLAT WRITTEN STATEMENTS Page 3 of 4 Area of Parks and Trails: Area of Wetlands and Buffers: Final Area of Dedicated Right of Way: Legal Description of All Lots: Easements to be Vacated: None proposed. None on this proposed addition. 1.136 Acres See Final Plat Graphics, Sheet 2 of 2. Temporary Roadway Easement (Easton Village) D. EXPLANATION OF ISSUES SINCE PRELIMINARY PLAT: The lot layout has been revised to adjust to market conditions, allowing for wider lots and a mixture of lots to create more variety and options for builders. This adjustment of lots will not alter the overall density and is not a request to increase or decrease the overall density of the preliminary plat, only a request to adjust lot lines to accommodate some more variety for the overall subdivision. E. FINAL DENSITY: Same as presented for Preliminary Plat Documents. Below is a summary of the density calculation of the preliminary plat of Easton Village: INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVMENTS: The proposed storm sewer will be connected to the existing pond constructed with Easton Village. The water main and sanitary sewer will be extended from the constructed water and EASTON VILLAGE 2ADDITION FINAL PLAT WRITTEN STATEMENTS Page 4 of 4 sewer of Easton Village. All utilities will be constructed per city standards. The storm water ponding for this addition has been planned for and will he accommodated by the existing constructed pond of Easton Village. Stubs for water and sewer will be installed for future phases of the overall project. G. CONCERNS OF NEIGHBORING PROPERTIES: No known issues. H. CONFLICTS WITH NEARBY LAND USES: No known issues. JUSTIFICATION RELATING TO BURDEN ON EXISTING INFRASTRUCTURE: This project is a part of an overall larger project, which density has been planned for with the installation of a trunk sewer and watermain and highway right turn and bypass lane for access, therefore this project will not create any undue burden on the existing infrastructure of the City or surrounding area. In addition to the water and sewer charges the City will get from this project, it will add approximately S14,000 a year in tax payments to the City of Lake Elmo, with additional tax payments going to the County, School District and Met Council to offset any burden created by this project. PROPOSED LAKESHORE ACCESS: None Proposed. PROPOSED PARKS AND OPEN SPACE: None Proposed. Easton Village currently contains a park and open space, dedicated with the first addition of the project. The trail connection originally shown on the preliminary plat has been eliminated on this final plan. For this neighborhood to connect to the trail system, the access is by sidewalk one block south at the Easton Village Park. We have found that customers purchase cul de sacs lots because of the added security and privacy they provide for families, with the feature of one entrance for both pedestrian and vehicular traffic. CONSTRUCTION SCHEDULE: Construction would be expected to begin as soon as possible in the spring of 2017. Substantial completion of the project would occur in the fall of 2017. ���K����8PJF�U�� '~'�'°'^^'"'`'"`^^^'"' Date: April lZ,2Ul7 ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Gehene�P.[. Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan Sterripski,pE. Chad |saksvn,P.[. 651300.4261 651.300/4264 651.300.4267 651300.4283 To: Todd Erickson, P.E,Erickson Civil Site Re: Easton Village 2ndAddition [c: Tom Wolter, Chase Development Construction Plan Review Jack Griffin, P.E,City Engineer Stephen VVensman,City Planner From- Chad |sakson,P.E,Municipal Engineer An engineering review has been completed for the Easton Village 2 d Addition Construction Plans consisting of the following documentation prepared byErickson Civil Site: * Easton Village Preliminary Plat Revisions dated March l7,2017. ~ Easton Village Preliminary Plat Stormwater Management Revisions dated March 17, 2017. * Easton Village ZndAddition Final Plat, not dated. * Easton Village ZndFinal Plat Narrative dated February l4,IOl7. * Easton Village ZndAddition Construction Plans dated March 17,ZU17. STATUS/FINDINGS: The following comments have been provided in addition to the Final Plat comment memo to direct plan corrections necessary for final construction plan approval. When submitting revised plans, please provide a point by point response letter that details all changes made to the plans. FINAL PLAT, GENERAL PLANS & SPECIFICATION REQUIREMENTS: * Final Construction Plans and Specifications must be prepared in accordance with the City Engineering Design Standards Manual using City details, plan notes and specifications and meeting City Engineering Design Guidelines, � Specifications for the Easton Village 2nd Addition must be prepared and submitted for the improvements. GRADING PLAN AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS & STORM WATER MANAGEMENT: • [I:Label exiting utility type, pipe size and pipe material. w [2:Label existing street and ROW widths. • [Z: Provide existing inverts of all structures. Some inverts have been provided on the plans, many others have not. ° [3:The first Erosion Control Plan Sheet must have the City Standard Plan Notes for Grading and Erosion Control. Move these plan notes from Sheet [5. ° C3: Keyed notes are 'incomplete and in some instances are not correct. Please review and revise as needed. ° []: Add protection around existing storm sewer FE5 in 0ut|ot E. ° C3/C4:Revise grading note #l8toreference the correct plan sheets. * C4: Remove proposed 3rcl Addition Improvements from the 2"o Addition plans. w [6: Drainage path from rear yard of Lot 5to Out|ot E contains a critical EOF point between Lots 7'& The entire drainage path must be emphasized in its design \oestablish a permanent flow path (established PAGE 1 of 2 oma|e) that cannot be graded in the future. The EOF must be located in the center of the 15 foot easement with gentle grades within the easement area. The grade within Village Parkway must maintain the 496 maximum slope, How does the grade from the right-of-way connect back to the EOF grade? • [G: A redesign of the grading/storm sewer layout along rear yards of Lots 3'6' Block l is required. The storm sewer pipe |stoo shallow, does not meet the City minimum pipe cover, and the HVVLshou|d not be allowed to pond over the pipe as proposed. A beehive structure must be used when located in the open rear yard area. m [6�The grading plans must be revised to include frequent spot elevations along Lots 2-13, Block I as a quality control measure to guide the grading contractor to contain the HVVL contours within the easement areas. These spot elevations must be shot and provided as part of the as -built grading plans prior to the release of building permits, Provide minimum of spot elevations per lot. • C6:Rov)sethe|owfloore|evadonfurLots9'l4andLotsl'G,B|nck1to918£Thedownstreamas'bui|tEOF otthe south end uf0wt|otEis817.Sl * [6:Label the storm water Pond and provide the HVVLcontours, ° C6: The grading plans must include the driveway locations and grades and building setbacks. * C6: The grading plans are incomplete along Village Parkway and the west side of Village Parkway. All areas must be graded to provide positive drainage throughout the site, including the temporary grading conditions. ° [6:Add atemporary cu|'de-sacper City standard detail at the north end ofVillage Parkway. ° [6/[7: Revise grading note #7 to reference the correct plan sheets. ° [7:Remove proposed 3'uAddition Improvements from the ZdAddition plans. * [O:Add lot setbacks, street names and temporary cul-de-sac at north end of Village Parkway, w [S-[l1:Utility conduit crossing locations must beshown onall plans. ° C9: Revise cu|'de'sacQeomet/ics to meet City minimum standards; pavement radius nf45 feet and R/VV radius of60feet. • [11: Revise typical section plan note as follows: "See City standard plate DOl for placement of pavement section including drain h|e". • [ll: Add plan notes for completion of Village Parkway storm sevver. Show existing storm sewer as existing on the plans. Ad plan notes to adjust catch basins, placement ofcastings, etc. ° C11: Label low points and high points on plan view. * [I1:Remove proposed ] m Addition Improvements h"u om�heI Addition plans. * C11: remove Keyed Notes #1, #3, and #5. They are not applicable to the 2 n d Addition plans. = [lZ:Change sewer pipe minimum grade to03%whenever possible. ° [12: Revise water/sewerservice stubs to Lots 1 and 14, Block l to connect from Linden Court. * C14:Revise [8'Otomeet minimum 3feet ofpipe cover. ° C14: Redesign storm sewer from FES-5 to east of CB-4 to provide minimum 3 feet of pipe cover. ° [l4:Add plan note to protect/restore existing DT and clean outs with utility rework at Lots 4 and 5 Block 2. ° [14: Extend UTu minimum of 100feet in both directions with dean out at all ends from [B'7, [B'O, [U'Z and[8'], ~ C16'C21: Update details as follows: Replace details 201, 208, and 505 with March 2017 version. Add 313, 3lS,SO78'E,S14,8O7B,9OOA,90],9Q2and 90]. ° LI: Revise Note to require field locating all trees, not just trees on City p rope rty/right-of -way. ° i1: Show utilities on landscape plans to help maintain tree/uti|ityoffse\. * Add landscape plan for Village Parkway. * PLAT:ConsiderexpansionhortheeasementatrearyandofLots7'8,8|ockltobetkerprotecLc/kica|EOF. ~ Storm sewer design calculations must be submhted. The design calculations must demonstrate that all pipe velocities remain at or below 15fps and all nutfaU pipe velocities remain at or below 5yps. PAGE 2 of 2 h����/����F�U�� ��'�'�'~�'`'`'°��~�'°' Date: April lZ'2Ol7 To: Stephen VVensman,City Planner [c: Chad bokson'P.E,Municipal Engineer From: Jack Griffin, P.E,City Engineer ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Gehere�P.E. Jack Griffin, P.s. Ryan StempskiP.E. Chad |,akson'P.E. Re: Easton Village 2*Addition — Final Plat Engineering Review Comments An engineering review has been completed for Easton Village ZndAddition. Final P|at/Rno|[onstnvcdon Plans were received on March 22, 2017. The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by Erickson Civil, or as noted: * Easton Village Preliminary Plat Revisions dated March 17.ZUl7. ° Easton Village Preliminary Plat Stormwater Management Revisions dated March 17, 2017. * Easton Village ZndAddition Final Plat, not dated. * Easton Village 2ndFinal Plat Narrative dated February l4,Z0l7. * Easton Village lndAddition Construction Plans dated March l7,IOI7. STATUS/FINDINGS: Engineering review comments have been provided in two separate memos; one for Final Plat approval, and one to assist with the completion of the final Construction Plans. Please see the following review comments relating tothe Final Plat application. FINAL PLAT: EASTON VILLAGE Zn»ADDITION * Noconstruction for Easton 0DageZnd Addition may begin until the applicant has received City Engineer approval for the Final Construction Plans; the applicant has obtained and submitted to the City all applicable permits, easements and permissions needed for the project; and a preconstruction meeting has been held bythe Oty/sengineering department. • The Final Plat shall not berecorded until final construction plan approval is granted. • Final Construction Mans and Specifications must be revised in accordance with the Construction Man engineering review memorandum dated April 12, 20I7 and approved by the City Engineer. In particular, the grading, storm water management including critical emergency over -flow locations, and storm sewer must berevised tomeet the City engineering design standards. • Final Construction Plans and Specifications must be prepared in accordance with the City Engineering Design Standards Manual using City details, plan notes and specifications and meeting City Engineering Design Guidelines. • All easements as requested by the City Engineer and Public Works department shall be documented on the Final Plat prior tothe release ofthe Final Plat for recording. ° There are no Outlots as part of this Plat to be dedicated to the City. * Final Nat should be contingent upon the City receiving copies of fully executed temporary easements for the temporary cu|'de'saousing the City standard easement agreement form. PAGE I of 1 LAKEliil,r4I(, IINN-,()TA RELIIVIIIVA Y LAT DFICE1I113E11 1. , 2014 4 UNIT Sism.F. trAmmy REs,DENTh,l, St111,0-1,10s 200 0 200 EPS, SUCP 1400 PLAN SHEET INDEX MEET NM SHEET I0 SS 3 00041110ii ex arr.....". a ECUP01000.9P.S 3 10.1.0.000 Cs MU.. 601.0.4.0.004 g PPSIS.P.I.P. 111001594.1.11400I00—..— : PPISI.XPIASSUSP. MX.. 00 P. 014 SAM_Mateb 40 $01044410100s CAI 3101441610.104 CU 010.00004444*44 44 150010(00060.P02l trs.0.1 04 0100402 rs pm-ft...VA 442 11000101001410 0434002011*44 940.10SCPPEANS s S.IPASS00..sCsts _ ss. I 0S000CE01. I U..... 1 Eirtri,:f.-4),:c OWIT, 4041e, 10110014444 00, 0 _1 I— ul3Ei Z 320 o 8§ <0 uJ 111011 fs, iss.us ..ssusssas'Assga001 lus.uss_m U.W. 1 TITLE SHEET 44424434 1 LAUF, ELM(>, MINNESOTA ND DDITION INAL LAN LNG, EROSIONCONTROL, STREET, STORM SEWER, UTILITY, LANDSCAPE AND PLAT AtzeMu 17, 2017 \, 2 No Au' pviluN \ I: INvr SIN(;1,m noilLy Esmy„'NTIAT, St-BDIvIszloN PLAN SHEET INDEX BK-ET NO. SWEET111 DOCUP101 El mEstar They e2S hr : % SA EVI.- a i'.. i triSESTOW 0, I 6 Ca. a wocr.taawys,\Krts I'm ra: 44 003 T CO t Mt ri.4.411,:ftE _...,,..f,q,.. lorgo......Y. X 11(41E .1 1 ftrxv . ....,.ipyta_..111.1101,1 L---i1V; WAS WAS , 171,, r .1:. !---11+21 eld 4 I t Li OFS 1 a fV3 I 30.4 1.2431CiPEPUNAMTAX PSZALLYAVWX1.444,4..04) TOMMANOLdi NEM.* 1.11,130 ERII 'MS CI VI L 1,131.4Acietv.0.54 504 %,..* 0010000 697C F i . i......., { EASTON VILLAGE 7.ND ADDITION FINAL PLAN LAKE El„MO, MINNESOTA CHASE DEVELOPMENT zi 10 C'ClINITY ROAD 12 WEST 131:RIJSVI LAE, :%;1,1 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES: 11 VOT13.004AFSIALGUIRLWAMSZIMOON101.4.0.6celt. ORAW,A707.1.9.001.1014100.11EME.O. 4 Ittinii...02...W.ASOMEORgang4.24.0,1 DOW9XESAMI.10.144.106a15.10.07,00.E.10.108.444,4100wEaft. 00.4.1.0,6.0.0,01a1*20,01.01.14Pf.4.4145.0044V100, 1311,MOIIMMDEgr,.....1f.n.0.4.1.AMPRXETIMMONCOsAt 0015,30....gatiMIMKONOMONNUVOKOfatr9041.,14.11,...0 1.15,,T011,04FAMENCOPTOLS AXI,141.114.4130.5..5031VIIWWWW.V.N1-111h..A...540,NWEA 4 Pg041*,..0.01.. 1,..1E8g3M-1.1,1.51."#.1114titIMPS IVAN. A.101.M010.0* .0644.1,1Talotr. O +3.304,0.2,k01,116EDAVeSIVEYMMIKAINA1,10?-4,204,3-$1,04,15..11+,00101.45 g al....1.4geMSevrti.a.11..M.01,SSERMAXV 44acce0003.rataVi0000e...20044411100t 00004000*11*000041401 C41,,..WrIftalail.4,,,SCVAisgm.E001100 KEYED NOTES lenx151.1104 14104.0clapernunualrt4.2 (3, rall..040rPr< • BO. CT 1180010001010104 0004104 commucr CIXIECIEN ROAD TO575.77115 .~_.�^_-~�_� 14,(10.4,4970.1111.4...14,14.0.141104VOLVATUFTSt114.,30 11 1100103403004004404054*M04nit At,....109 KEW. WAMICUI11,1.4 6=00. tiattig.C.FU400t;44Mieganii...310101VOL443904040.00 Oa.% .i.i.CSMS4118,141.SCIIMPVI/X47pieff.t.).-06,0.100,111Mttelt.MCCUtt fiEBOAMY.IMNIOUUSCOMPRELIE,,MEM. 40 ittaRMI..4.1.1..ZOWSOMASK.....,.£1.0440,411510.35fX1.1I 00004144.4.3.VVYWASWP01iO4aSet, 04 $.1,140#411.100Mc.1104WMINMSI.AMME,00411E04VOMARMEZ1(1e6, 1.1”..101,4444FEWralt..W#410.0.4.16EKItaixttlArlialflUttMtiMittildft 10 AHMIEMMAHALf.91../tInMEgiuttIEFICUPPNWXYVVIC.1,04110041g4v. 04*I.10FP0.11101NPUIE4044S.000CORM., (41fita000,/1310441..0,411,04,“0g1 1004ef£01/0nvt,e4Vire*004)1* 14,4f,A.07gaft...MICON.VVOrMarrtiE04- 10 AkttirflaremOggriSAIMAllatpalli.ACIW,Vill.Neilkj MiSitafT0404IS101 0 ItOtg.11..01C1.13,1.011.C...1.61.6E4 0 NELIMMINLIA.01.1.1.0.0.511,11.0). ga0.004.t.00k 3130.....01.00,3347.4.. • . „ N 'SO 41.0 LEGEND 0414040104014*0*0 Pla.02410,P.MAINAL ggg 0411.43.1411011,040011. 4VOKEEIS.1,11EMAIRSOMMIIMA.4.1 at. 0.11.2 .1. • of A ttEENNE1117161,71,477147.1,61,70111 tagerkIMIXTMERMWE 9.1,0KMAtalfiNWKAti,MISMOICA,tgb0.8.3.0) 004044 LA,EN ToMIL k,fe,,N3 0.aah. 1.1t.:X/SZPDVALSOF.D.W.f.4 at1.1014,07.414.60,1#0.1iNKOMEIto.arro£1 SWPPP SEQUENCING 4 0...,....K.A.140MATIA.VSTA1MWINEE0.1.4XTerid. 41 1,19,717.1041777101111ONNZ,19474471,777171., 111.11.1,11WIAMEEM.OVIMM4SACHNOC..raKfte.11V.C. 04 460001400430,014415.00,*00IOAVIUT00000004E 0000140.1TWA000141A004000ERA00AWP1*if0000*OK41465. itilt+MAI.OttrA.4.45.61,411MOTKATOOTC4.4 Yi SIT,C#K.EMPSOR.0.0,44.KAVERASMCSIV503.00.0..1-1,MACI 440100e..310t011.101104.1....434004)0111. gt6gt0000.404011040004 1410004400440004400KVA41100,04000..4001 1410141.10016,11041MWAS.C.M.MOKEIMagRalt 1410.10$1,4*.V10,001,00.1264.M.Cflat1104.1.01x. Ignal.patevt.SEM. 14.....•0144314.01.8.10MMIEVAIVON-04401,1ER, itroAtTRA AMMO MCMPICstrg01010..SYSIXAS.1114akg.tii0.419.....1.0,MOVVII. gffONA,..11WKAIMUYEWXLMAWAVIVAila.1.iglaMO..t.;1;401.7131 ea0,M.M.L1021.4,0,91114,1.0i,50.11.1artaiMIMOMMAS Affiemorrowaraat CITY STANDARD PLAN NOTES I. 0E3100E 741. MATO 717,A7 W714 6 tNCHES Or kftvgat. 440041004080 ,$) 040007 )0410 4. MINN ALL 511K. SOFIA 01000S0E004441> OMR 10,0,Dig 04140 evalm..noN CeaPtEleD. 0.00001.044444.000004000440 ROAR CO 401400E. 00 a'AVD 40 tfihifel Win, Mt P. KIN ESTASUSTEE, 4. RESENVONT NON Ea.!, EEEN 7M774 04 0005 40 NYC OVEN 1. A KENNY 0. Z ROVE OE SOO %NI BE RACED )7710.4N7 7a DIE AN,, 4, MEM AlANG exuArmos. 1,01 FEPICe Sithl. 004740400 EtkEETEV SEI0100 11404 50 ACCORCMCE 17. NE WA 5114400 GEMS. 44 80E00004O NO lint} RESTMOON ',WES fiRADPIO. 4ATIVO01 0400 00.044 Of ROM. t.1.01fil Mit Set MILE 444470000 PW7Et 00141*04. EltICICSON C1111, NEEL-1574ESNE 5.711 EENEE,NENnor 04041110104 SYS ;00.000114,01140 4418 07.117/2577 H 7 z r 1-a 0 EN. 16-175 Ott 00.041041101, PLit, 1010040 C3 GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL NOTES: tl .VTIMADIVO..E.SSOSEAKAVGWEIII£S,r..,..,,.".,,,,g. thailk.M.11110.3.01.)41.1.31 ..4.1-1044,MvOINERFINIXottFOMEUMISNVMMOTIA ..A.X.9(.114=401*KOPIDIAUAANR,Wr A10301.M.43VMMOKIrt. %,,,km,,,1314115EMAILEMITEnsavalf..11,10,11.0.1..0).+ORROTAREA. 4 844484114O161.44044p1444441.14.11541744441(4414.441995 4804E07.7114 54 144480444LAMIXOF9541145888a4.80444448000455..0460,.1...10950410 Saf4.00001..b.iiESTAZIMMOVV.KET ....,==.00.31LFZIrtr,,,,884444140414404 KEYED NOTES (27 Kr.11. SUMO (:)44141 WC( C.) P4101t188050 rE.O. 04.41.104P55184104 95411144558A844514101445448043 554004148 op Pz 0.11.1Vittar0.7411801.40.08045.11.10a0040C.E5W.1/00500880 0440.0k,FAX1000.41.(MATOVILMVISYMEAWDYM110-001%..YRP- 86004.C1SERMI.2,150405140684R444119.550te44444010,00445O .ftitteMVSZIAMCCPCMIAOrtilWapaaVIVIATRUIENMIEMSCAMMI.L.K 4641V4i0.M144.301415.6M147int laDittSM.V.*4914.34.703.0.[E20,.../.4.11ME.Mialaw /0^,rniklrad.....$940490,20.16) RAMOCCONAMM40,10180.119COMMECAW.M.OVIAMINCKSMITIVIt91 1060.11.014i,01,rtrraMIS.W4003.0.410£04iLiatfINt.AsitECOUTP6Mank 444 knefdiAeinkl.K.11;a04111ESMSSAUSe.M.SIOXIMIV.C.A.Mta.094. 40 Op 0P/43£60/111.14841184BE40:MCIFNPA4980444 ei-STEMCS11110.41349,111I54448491IE5 11411im48484480.,04180*1101114041 4490404*415 J49455841144484*4954411=4454148440048454E5449. 44»8ff11044,0401114309044.f8404094444kEr44.14'10 ctao4o1P4-...O.4.44t LEGEND 20P+0010485XMART 0.1.11.0.1.WPERWC 959 ..1131=MCCHICS4.12.1. 311:1.107111AIZAVIMOINWEI.A.VEn .T ova +ow ar.r 4448105* .1.0treti.004501734440rt,k340g) fiG4448408100491/*004 Efa.01081ACIA.ert.0E0041raln(.4t 44484480 3).Y3 ,OPla s.. )94495448004449440411201451486440 .41,..*14,1.470414,(7.40)11140.01111.E1 I 110.{.M.C6111.0.10.4,4 SWPPP SEQUENCING 55 0.1W,...4.0.41tWIP..02.410.91.-ECUMIOXIMS 4 MIA.LECARIMVONENIUKEASSInVitiOtral 44 Mrfat.l.itftEMOTECIOIAMarkbatail.RIMMIRKIMOONOMMUI, NstediS016.1.340.4101ROPOIRIPAVe801.1464.E. 0114504481/441=0.9440:0144IIE44424449092IIOM0548480400* 55 ..VitrYRktigaVOC..3WEIVIC4......51/FORRIR 1045..4106.4,17.0.084010704.11041,6e44 54 454M4*/1.0.#0110.41.10160(0a7V1,01K-4.4.0 4 410141104740414ponittettAIXOBS444444V4 4 tOP444144+4441344.51144 qtafirlOWN4.101,11,11,.U.3.10000.50 1110.9111.01/010011U.C.416.40.411410t 10.1.1..80.9004.0....MKREIMADROS:60,14,050.... 44004130LLS040I884 .01,4±,a0C.MOMMYOG.001108tARTALOOKSIREEI 804£4148001415 1.1*014,0.94.001ANMSOOP10,40,...n.60,405.1tari4MTCH. liftWie...01111163MALAMINVIIMIVAMIV8600.0..W.EAVIA OW, .00190400E904494541144044044$1,11E15)07)44905*144424110550o0444 VifeASIVIKEONCER CITY STANDARD PLAN NOTES 444104(480.808004448030844 95540 S WKS 44 MOW. E843804440 550 1014/ 387/. 40 ,,namt.r ALL STOW SLIMS *00(1840404.045050 5404504 AMC WOO. ti111-. 4448444,4441 PS 4044,480 1 04*4508144. 510t .1}Kt 45404541 RCPAACE 50440441041 844441D 1304 ?UV kAS 58404 MTVLS.ED. 44 405100441.1 WA% Svia. WAN YON 7 GAYS Cr Nit WOK, 59WI. Of 2 ROI Of SOO MALE OE Rh= M34.4.04110 ttfe 4414480004180 SIOCIEVARDS 90.1550445 t+Al. tit ,VetaS 6Agant SW.* ,K 00824440444848044 MIR 'Mt an SNORE!, PEWS. 44 NV11.10 4414 PI56/9 14545885409 0.240E5 Mit %NW% 9400 WLMES 4.4 MOW, fitXxS...5 8400044 CHIMS, 414LE 04454144 4441144 4444440. E141(AZSON (.11111, 4400 74,411.911444 09944*0003440005418 414a:4', 40450 0)4170-411 1044 • w 0,1 E— C. 2 7..47 84 .c 0 ZZ 44444 18-1 TS 12111M crw} t; C4 ti, ENN MENI 5:ENS IE.:, N,E tr,Et,2A 12,2,2i,E,?Stg, 2-'2 STANDARD PLAN NOTES 09-5,c)r4 CE11011EN FLCIKUARY CITY OF LAKE ELMO ,gg NW., 5,f1 vev4f1d0 IgA-z4 V, O. stin V:42, tE 13,:24221337E.3+ ,NE,NE ENNi StAtE. ;;;174,Znit.i: 3 33 3;VEEN 47:"A‘..tktar V4.40,311 XS STANDARD PLAN NOTES GR,co-ic FND Aw; FEBRUARY 71115 (0,/, ! CITY OF LAKE ELMO {OW ay, ,,,,,,ISC/V0 ,<S1fra fr,t ,uta,r,rot , 14; AO. Stp , K. ,i1,4 e. 1341 3',tom ,P,1 44,(5,t,ft Flutx tied, 4 „Zi +AR 14 SEE, NE grEEN. AEN, , +01,11., 6,4 at itr,trra. ,45,,,,,,,ItattO CO,Cleg or.EF 0,6,-,.11 STANDARD PLAN NOTES 73333+0 Asi) 3130303, ONI01. PLA,Jr, FElltWARY 73713 oiRERCi CITY OF LAKE ELMO sR. 33310 t WNW I t O3A3313I0,113333. 41.44,81,flk t112+, t6-176 34 ogroggas GRAVING STANDARD PLAN worrs C5 r t - - - EASTON VILLAGE 2ND ADDITION FINAL PLAN KE ELMO, MINNESOTA r- 01.2.0.813 CHASE DEVELOPMENT 2110 COUNTY 11CA 97. WES- URNSVILIX. MN 55117 LEGEND 1010 -- 15Ci 1717 MV411.903.140 07,11M1)1,111,101,01AffIRAL !157810111.11.16erSTEXE1 wVAt1.150,111111.1104EVAIN ,4,1.1111)1ST.10,,11110POWC.11.1.10510514,;.1.1 1111,11011filifteD01021137,11. .9010,13,1111.111.31011 P.11/1016111..1,1,11.1f#1£10,10M1'11C11. 1,10.4464/11,1841.1131Atini.TIF.4 0,4.1a111:10111,9411 1M11011114,11. GRADING NOTES: 1, 1,11/111$4101011,1111,34111111110 UEVA1101101.22.6111117111111110.1%. ft£11g0=1110111,11101004//1,4,,,ME11.110,11,14. 1011314ME1tirf.1.1018.1110001,1111,14110160,11,M 4 WO V111.1111114t1.11#1111141.1410111011,11.11.11t$A11010.11.1011113. pk,/,=',,w/$1,talkhRetS1111,110,,a11V1IVAMMitt.1.6V1tiotAIIMMtil 4 0,1110100 Z01110.1101110.011+011010,000110.1000411"0001100:003.101100000111.10.1 1A1.31.41A1,111,1MinliKfbff 1183.1.111erat1.1,40110.11£11111.01.411111£1101,1110 .1110121,,:0.11111103/1116.1111114, zo/0,0,0000.00,000,000ssnisres0003/0100111/rt..001.001.110/1110010000.100.110000/100 101001-011...)0011001.011.111/.0101011 101 /01.111151.00,4010=00110.10/0031011111111311,0100100111/%1 ENGINEEREDISTRUCTURALFILL REQUIREMENTS 0 roc-477a 991•9:T;i94. r cocoa W.. 1) 10111400001110011.0K11100151130.1110101V111.811.0104110011000.0110.07301.011151114 00151010,11111=1101010,0111. 1) t110001011311.0311,000.001010.001111,1111.11F0.1)44000000000.41/0000,0000040.000 1.0.010000160110119,0001040010, 4 114.0014.010010701110111101110111100111100211.11111001104110.1,100.04 0'1117031010400100011011/010101.00110,0/0111,1101.1.014111,01.10.011115114101 13011111110810101110.0010111001.11/1101171)0176611.10011 IM101151E0401510001/11,111111.11.11,111.1.419010.1111,0010440.131.1110.1001 001111111.10511001111111StRIMM111.030,0141000.0111 11 00,000100/01000.01.1011.01.9110,10101110.44000,001.1101,010,01010.01011sit0m. 01.100.1110101..1 DOWNTAaL 1001.01X1010,FOROW1401 10:160 114,011-1 11.5.11111.5 EIZWKNON CIVIL 101.44141,,,,,13..$11 901,,,,,t0dastema mkg, fi...000/1101010 wyntesiehowiette.a. NI MC, Gig4.1, 46-175 11,111rit GRADING IRAN , ! 1 1 , , . "," , s 1 o„ o "' l'-',;;;--- - - - 1 ;;Nanit1116161:24- TP,0-0.43111‘ ISM lam t T.. i .....,_ .., ." ,,, 6 ''''''';,,,„,6. 1;1 1 4 / Sot9';'48, .$$*;,. 1 $ $ $ $ V ..- .46...- . -4 5. ... ,i-.. ....1 71. FRONT OF LOT L r 57-It 2 I Fa REAR OF MT EASEMENT DETAIL 50 YU Legend Vat it511,514 i1f4t tififitii1tt74.11M15641141 JtattstattatS43. :tl - - lAINSOIVAX 4111700550311955740( Development Standards row VillVitiVi100140051 401.5093£5014. 110454011104 ntroktoTatttot. 1411751,515.05 117 510i7OPEASSEN14 41500,4541VAE555154$415 404105134119150.0,050.514,11V17.: tiiiiiiiii&ViVEVIRS4P44311,59400 1771t 17144.15,401411)01TEVIViiii$10.1414.215.411,140100410414.4 CITY STANDARD PLAN NOTES • 1777177 son,. Sitstt & Stsisiln, sYS slts SrssasAsS 5 sst, WV Or 07177 ,s Ut.4r17745 S.(51 071 sus7 t sLs SV‘S ISIST 5075 7.510. 1 171.1705 DO*. 544 SE Vitt V Wilt* Vita (WV. 4. VCR VOSS 7770000070 077775 0077757 Ottauf Km, TO LESAT S. SUMS Mt POStS 10 et 41 tuistUR Post 7541 SOW ski Ws.% 1 40016 03,17/21317 b. DESSIestti PS SUMS ASS 745770I. MSS 51.410707 07400010000. X. Mt SPOSSISS SAVattoft 4411,44. StISLL 01 USES StS 0.4. Sksttltrr MOSS& S. VMS ReSS 0150701414 ittei 74.100 5041 PA4E34£444 4.444151505 SHAU. Val ViE 0(100014403 of tcfm/ ViCOSSANS PDS StsSitaRICS. 0011 UMW Dall EASEMENT I CO OR STORM EA Sal it- LOT VEDTII AT REAR OF LOT ?It 16175 mar.. loS0UN0EE0T srni LAY01 IT, I, ITINC AND SIC/NINO PLAN OT AT RIGHT OF WAY 0057)0 TYPICAL LOT DETAIL C8 OURT NORTH PLAN VIEW - LINDEN • c, \ t' '1 '. PROFILE VIEW - LINDEN COURT NORTH RN 4,06 140 149 \ 2 4 5 5 ,CEr VERTICRI. G_Rt'krtHI_C. Legend [IT N attlittauNt.attptlatteltt AVFIXEDSfibitiMPATANIa Layout Notes (0411,1111.10 AL6401.04310PEUMOPM*10$0110.0.24... Keyed Notes 0 1...1.1.07411,...01.ftrStita...,11.. 0 ...10.01101.4*...&4311MaretiMr.),}#,V. 04.41.COVVE.00.1,..,...11.51 0 MAYMMEUMer....0 0 011%..Etbal[COMIZAPPAIRCITV.AktiPtAtitt OW. 0 Wedt,.....41c9VIR.V.,01tail)(11413,MRSE04 at.riotwoogowatet. 0 awermervulacrovroweoloxime,00tommorac, rtenTOVOUTOPCAL Ev.irn8ox It III gad Wit ST, SkrEl gam., Qacl rt_uJ/.,3511 4008 03,17+7(117 letin 'mom; rRE.F.T PLAN tSt. PRORLE 9 11# PLAN VIEW - LINDEN AVENUE NORTH PROFILE VIEW - LINDEN AVENUE NORTH 1040,ft UMGINTELE.6,424 GOMM itTA*1.2711i PASIA.3.4, art.tom 04141 Vit. CES14 34{1' USW MOW €90,424,71 HICAPOPOSTA.1.24.Th rn$14.24a 00021,02 X.62.4 g roa 1W0' .15 094 VERPCAL 190 199) 1101 Legend Var. IgrogontaMmailit Layout Notes 9 9.99999309999 94199951999709990M91999939999999999. Keyed Notes 0 10919019999999999.9929199999,99991, O 9991.99999992999,99999.09999999991.9999999,999 0 99,49999£1799.99999994,99999.9516 • 9999999941999109 0 eir..marouxtemamotrivrfflonmrtwagatos O 999997999949999,49119-99X999999,9099099. 999.99919/9099,9999099 0 /91991999999999.89,999.4999999949.9,999, 9999.992,9969999.9,0,49999.9999999 EU It "IiliON CIVIL 999999999999991 999999.999a 999941999291 lnert.aidopacier Amu 9999999 19999 I 1 99999,999 99, 404 tfi 0311712417 399 61, •51- :110SET PLAN & PROFILE war. C 0 PLAN VIEW - VILLAGE PARKWAY - t 3rd Addition PROFILE VIEW - VILLAGE PARKWAY it " OR) ; . . . , . _ . il ir; i ; - Pti, 4.,. PSI 1;0 It.. VILLAGE PARKWAY COLLECTOR, tOltdeGlYntrf.APFLgtVf. IltalefrVE.Wt.104,0001C6,1300 CUM 130.1,4tVe 11,040.0 1).V0V154.20 RAVelarite Pf.06.3..tygoVIRI4lij Cr.69.510EVSE *art. 4,044....061 trVANWRIME COLLECTOR ROAO SECTION Legend PM& PhSelett.tertElE.V.I44, Layout Notes suvorroakuto.rt fi ...40SEK.110.0ZSOFCLFC*12.1f.MOVERIAIE. Keyed Notes NVMS,A1.1fult.00.4.440Ding.trrtgiiimaptsrida 0 fen$4.0.AVESIMAAPOMITSPOI.F.1,0110. • /awmonootgaufr CI) • *4780..,...yinvorr.1",{Pdri.410..Rett.P.....114 • tfil.....Mtvlia.RIMO/Laiitentf 0 enttuteit.41,39*. 0 0.4111472,10.0g,r0.011,4,1. 40418 01/17i20.17 z r 8 7 tr, Z — 10475 I 2.1,N STREET PLAN ,SL IPALWR.E. C 1 1 PLAN VIEW - SANITARY SEWER (LINDEN COURT) PROFILE VIEW - SANITARY SEWER (LINDEN COURT) 58*400 AAA 5 r Er 4444454... 54 4 444414 4,144,1,.5 Keyed Notes 0 W... 41.4121.1.44.........1.4. 0 140.34.41.6.004.61.4.74441.44A.5.444. Notes gAt cr. ..11.41.1.1441044.443.01.40..... 4 4.30.441,444144.014.1.5/.......40500140544 City Standard Plan Notes AMERMAN AAA Anvari...1464 ..A. 444.1.44 64.5 Awn.. 44 06644. A.* 6196.. OVA Ire At f4.44 644 Q.. A 4444.6 AVAr At 4.64 Ref.. A .4 (144 AA 40.63. A WA VAI. SA. AM 49.04 A.. SM. AN ta.A. WC von w. OW A... 444 644,4 4.6 WA AVM. 44 044.14. 6 AMARA VA. Alt MAIM WAWA MAW. A.A MAMMA 4.41.4.41 0. 414. v. OA.. . AAA Ako .... 1.4 MI At waa 4044.6 4.1 ..4 4.4 AM.. v.. Emu 1.111 Au. nOt NOM AVA gra.. 5.4.6 A.411.4.1 .1-44 0.0054 NV 5144. 4.31, 51460750024114.4 O. .4 AAA* Aki 44805104 ar.c. 444. 0444 4 A.. 4. AA.... 1.44111 s 4.4 065.44.4 4441, fai 440.... TA 4.6 Ave .4444.43 .54 64. A.. A54800*4.08055445015*05. Legend ; • 74064004.*8*450 .444e44.44444421.40*44044555 50 41402346460455*4004 14040.440.4445244.440. A43.0014.44.1 44.1.1.4 404.4.4.2.44.44.1 45144.4.14.446.1.161.41.41 41.• 50.4.444.447.444..088 400.4124840010544444.444 461,444.444)0520* • 800442* 4.4.70,4 4.44 484644 4444444. SWEAT( SEWER A. 4.6 cA8A84500 44.44.v xrg CM .044 Me st.A AA .44 AM 4444.4. to WA 4.4640 Mom ....AAA 46.4t 4.44. WA. 444 4.44 A Mal WM 01431.,....4 .14 IMAM 3.14 *0*40 AS AA .1 0.4.4. 44.41.1.41. A AAA.. 44.6 SARK. 914. IA 44.1 AVA. SAM ... 211 VAC 000044.1.0 461 AAR 04.74 144.1443.14 41.44441 TIA sfeatauta, 5*414.11655560L1. PVC 444 .644 144 440800591A VA MAW WA Ma (.4.03, 202*20*1.2*852*40 MOWN ok. .m41) A AV.. 1446.4 AVRA .4444 1.0.4 ...A 44 4444 M.o. +4, .91V.V ..7[11. %WM 14644... Mire 119. 4441 AA Awn 444.4 A 44144.4 ael.n. Ak.f 14714444. Atzr..7 A 4 1.4 3,44 MAIM .44.4 DA V. SM. A... AA.. M.. 41 At A.M. sa..41 k • 4444.6 4444 4004 .41 rak APATO 44.44 WI CAW. 4494 .41A 0444.0( AM 1.614 W.' .60 Me 14.4.4. A. MU Valls 2444 At 44.440 444464. DA. vs. 4464444 6.14.6 vArkan. 444.4 Ku. 1. 4.44. ElarlitiON ell II. 4554*494*055080*2 Mae p248055* 44.44.4444.1.461 *0.555 REEELM14 SANITARY SEWER 45 kVA1 MAAR,. 51 & raor0 E smrnfl C12 PLAN VIEW - SANITARY SEWER (LINDEN AVENUE) Keyed Notes 0 147/61.RCIAIRIMIRRIARTSPREIR*10.7171.11170, 0 *V.. Iff0016117/1.7.1.7.667011.7.*III 0 *AMU. Iff 0 6.66.6.1.61.1.7..... Notes WEW176.666106571116.665.606651.671.177.6.5.6 17 If1.41166.19RIIIII*67419,117011.6.46677*-4.1PRIVIA1174 * IMERISIMI*111110070710410.641*M0 V516021 PROFILE VIEW - SANITARY SEWER (LINDEN AVENUE) City Standard Platt Notes *fp ;5754615 57.546 Legend WATERMAN .850154.6.1417107044*1011 If RIRRI.XX RIR . .772 11.01 5146607.1 . *MEI 14.54.4101 ft BMW *MS 6141. IF PM.. RAY WV 514 MOM. RIVION or /6676.5 76/6 676. 5.66-51. 566666 6661.56017 766 1674 1765 **UM. SW. BC RIME RIR *RI, Pl*M0(047 4*40*41114*444410 un01. CRI-KAR fxrl. 6 Mt 6. IRAS I. 64 !MOW* sf MAW. 14 .411, COY WWI Sr MUM KIRI COI. SR. MO *1 76.4,3 ROI 1R.17 WO SKR RUIZ 52. 0 YU .71106, IRAS #1,11...0 40.11* .1 lb .13 7/1771.11 Ix. fltaall Ro4137. CR OR/016 IRA. .11015 II .1 CUR 1.* 21114 9. RIM *R1111 Re WM. Ralf If W.= SIM 10. SI MRAIRS ISINI/607 6. ask 1061,1.15 Ufa It *WORMS 46..116.1 4.41 PI WIC. IV. Iffi SMIS REX V. If.71 /RR 11 ROY. ARIA ff* MI COW I.. I MR 1. 71* CORRICIRRII Mk SOW .114 t VC AM SW SWALE ISRORAV SRRI R. A WAN f 47 RIA611440 MCI OM. e FIRI3 ACM Mt. GROR R/I17 600011 14 RR WW1. R., If II7PIR*117 ft1R f fa. 6715 TO RA.. RaN1570 fInst. 16161 514114 WORM Shf. ,14., f+I 9f040. VERIR1S1 I1Rwas,61_55g,16.6 t 711.170110.14E0? 6575.6515.66.155666667186. rlia65,3.9714196675 IROIRIFURGVIORXWARIIRIR 41144844*4191444941 PRIP7717 VARAIVIERBIRMIIVIRIRRAIE 4541070661231666764469441016ER solv.65157.57566..11516 5000404141243406664441356.040100144.7 77711.56444766.77566.65574** 60641*176444611.61100*555.6 017610115111414400 0430IR04*400411,1. 4841*414RICR*1474* 1441*44404111*04 E447404114Atil. fri.ff SANORY SEWER 7 Au. UITIRY SLIVI AND 141.#1. WV IX MM.= wtti SS Rua 51.. 5.47.41. ItT41. Ra. WNW SOO RA fit Sift4 114.4,441.. 1p 51.1. 00440'0A*444444*144?41*4*104*44211044*4544*444411400 484 1 ORM ONPRaff. Sna/P1 .167 %MR RI* RVI Rffl* *Rif IC WI II 41,61640c4 0472170 *84 4.14. SIAIR112.. 10014 PC I 467R 3614 61 Al S61 II INK, 4 SW. Min PK . 1.45 IR*6 CROON VW FI164,0001 fe 6.47. Sat V.. OKRA* Aft MR. fRO Stes56, 44 KOARI*1301 IOU. 111 KM* SM... No 1.6*. WI.. *NORM err . et#17.1. *IR RE 1411.6.1115 ./07 .11.1.44TIORMI RPRPRIE PRO Rif NI Tref sIff 7 A. If 61007 MEd ICRIX. *Rd 431054414 WWI ft414 IRMO Of fai lefet ff. fl . PAO MS WWI Eit .141, 165 EIVIRI, WM. :0 1.40. crolfeext 3071046, . W.. RI lift ARM 1 114f V.411/.. SMIRK P. IX *MID 110.1,t CPC 93:911...OW . NIARRIOR rohlf. 11*17409 6f411 6tak *MAW 6614 16173. VIC AI/. MU RR RR Of API TO NORD .10( 1.1 .18/ b eaRe471. 70 Al MR. SRVARy II*01 Wiffat ORRIS if raff MR.. V.R. **4404134401144434001407 711,35 08760.444. 11'166:61N CIVIL 117:6fi liff*Ret*IRM 177001*40417117 710071*//43* 0“ 44410 67.11712517 0* 16.475 34404140 5757166434715617441 & WATERMAN PLAN 56 151611175 17-75766- - g C13 PLAN VIEW - STORM SEWER Cahitt • _ `, RE: 05.00 -, :0. 040_ift ,07„ 07777,- aB77,--77777- \ -7- ,, \ 8 10 'L 0: COMH 1 RE 00300s 0 411.57 PROFILE VIEW - STORM SEWER (1 - 5) - 4- ,LSO liSPOSPEs CP SPEEP 1. 404 004 ESE, Sp PlIEE0.4f , . Sa..P )1' SPE E Et . 0 ,Ost 5 1.922_111 1 ot.s e• ol.E. tat,* 4”511 I I -- I PROFILE VIEW - STORM SEWER (2 - 8) spumystra - a .1-xottoam 3.3.7 04 .,r4RcAk CLISESILIBLLELL 55 404 EPE Legend Notes flOVAITMfahlY 100�440#%341000040444*040?40044 04430000004000000 g1130£41 PA....4.10%., gar. HOWEVALA dlitnt9.011%se_AMOWEineWe P-14,01COM,Mga.kelfge WINYE.PIVK VM€YERI,M10648}1.) PfirE033.1104040000001100000 144451004a4300430444I:4443444040 PODOCAVOL.53,03#0,01{ ozrowritorwoonan. - „72- - POPS Mat SEE,P - SPSIEN EEEPTEEtasEP A+. Re4 48 W17/2017 Z 0 -a-LL ;r7 PPSEENS Sat Ts‘v SESPEPH Es, ....R.D.IMTIIXAV‘VVIVIINSAWMPOIIIRP.41.4%.i.. 14 O4iW0041110100.1151000111,5018.5111117.41.0055C,C0400e Citv Standard Plan Notes 041 friaa,11.51443.1/0/0EW1 WEI tE psennECres KESS.. PETE., MSC( LEA FLO MP.% SPELEPPA10:1PCE1P141 /PS 00NOWEI11.1411#4,AMA CON.F191,111£1.4,603an OF IMMIVKZ169067CAVDMOIErEPPEIRRITht MC4,114-)00 00110043430004300004 1{RECAMMEArrt tAlnintfeoUtitt100.01.1.02. ra flit pZ0S0001904Sli0417, t f.fifi.-00,441-£1,004$P4#11t.likkgiVar,-0111.6.E 9401,41,0411,410kKaaritV,Aari.,*•1501AP)...E ,Z,RtUf £0,241n1.010,dt SIMOAA,VViatlftTAIN Otero. Otif$Mvsectim.c 815015EVAlwrialZ 410404*111444434444000041144040414143044140043404 .015F43.4.4345401,.$1.104.80, tIKUVEMEMACMIttOVIPORMSKLEXV1101,110tAllif wersi 44000041401,40140110044410144040440401404000 41...T.,,,IIXO-RWIJAITft0C.E.-WAT Mint Tif MKT STORM SEWER DESIGN TABLE a. EL.. 1 P4w /patios t E _ '-r ' .`a, . 1 sa Sp, aLa Yt.'ff1555 SjuI t,- am EP EEP J‘N 53 Sl iSSE SAE 45 55101 Ss Ss 710 , 777717 1115 15 5 3 IS Es 4304 10-170 MaTP11.1 WNW MAW MAN 4. monui WM, C14 --"„" 300,00,..4 04.0.000.7 it- Map GWAriAr.400000 - 04.0.0.146001 ..7000.004 SINGLE FAMILY WALK OUT (WO) 01.1.15.A1.00.0T 0.0.071.0.4 203.10.0.0.1 Zr MM.= SINGLE FAMILY LOOK OUT (LO) NO .11 0.00.09.10000 3.10.010..00 010. SINGLE FAMILY RAMBLER (R) KAU PAC 00.0 - 000 ODA 04444444444444(4.) 4.0.1.01 14-11:14`1(SON CI VI I, .0.1110. 40418 03d7t2014 z C15 CITY OF LAKE ELMO STANDARD DETAIL INDEX ital Spat: - aa, rFaeol, oarr,a, Avr.S. Fa: et: Asta. :ears ,,A1 , sters, A', tan rva 'Ara. ArateS- stATEAVAst ASK: (sae,. Asa, AA, Atsass Atattant Ast. A=, teAstAs. AAA rah ttastA AAA as. sA At'St :AU Assa Aar-s, st: pa ass staaAsta, AAsavAA A,Arts: A.., SSA volcAA' - Saltratie :eat, 56,165, 5..5 5116 A16,1666 At, 155 S6,61,- 5 A RAAE+6,1 465460 AA. Stat., - SPAR AA" 6.6 TO 610 4pi A Pr ,SA ASA& A...a ase A-S: TAA, :rata stAaate trs ;rata A 61565,560 566,651 ,6; 666 011<3351,055,A0 6,,56 AA0 0,10.1.0 6, 06.6 566,,A5 5"4560 55,451 655,55. 5,16.0a 0,6 1,6 LA6, 65,, FEBRUARY RR, I CITY OF LAKE ELMO '5 55051 6566 ,a(a. eat KY'. ‘16660,6"1/66,6.1.4 616.12446i a666v GRANULAR MATERIAL BEDDING METHOD 1,,AAA: 5,0 FRARRART 110 CITY OF LAKE ELMO IRS CITY OF LAKE ELMO STANDARD DETAIL INDEX A.- - earrtaetsla, :ARM. so Are, (as., 6"tr. :51,06,6 66, 6166 665a. .01 tata:ettr ...a a e.t.a AAA t", 60.Ef 15. 6,66, "6661 ". 5,66 S .516, 3,5.6,561 63 6,606,,,,, ,re tam AN 5,6 66, 1016 6, 5555 6,66 166.3 ,1,0 .66 5165 66666 $65Q5 AA, ,arstass Care Sat. SittASANA Aar., Asa., - satta, A, 65550E, .1.6, A-, rattra, :AAA. AA, .3 SCRES - WORN COMA.. AA, ets. toss (A.., .50,51.6,65; 6,6 .5.150665 .6. Ars. (rAARAA 6,6A 66,660, sA,A.2 asseAss Ass ...AA OW, Aartte 0.555 ,AR, TRAAAak.aa s. 0.35, est, (rArt, ASAIS ASA SADA., tsars, azares: VOA, AistrA ,tts ASAS amaao, EA,Aart ARRa` UP ES - RRCRA }RAMP:a 516555,64 a.,,,,,arva•Aaaava• A.RAtaiaAatraaral a,o,` iAae, i'WAAnat grAS`" 05111,5 4CR SLR ES - RePRAL ERR faRai 415 RIGA+1,50 0(00 10, AAA556, 5A6.1 5,66. £56 AT,066 65-6, Aasseins strat. (Aste, WA, 005 6,AA, (mat taste Asc., FRORUARY ZOO I oor,i'sv, CITY OF LAKE, ELMO F030RUARYIR15 Ar6.56,00,00.55, (54056000 A60,66,5 1/77, ".5 SPECIAL FOUNDATION FOR STABILIZING OF TRENCH 0,rarr so rar0r4) !trA,1:14!il CITY OF LAKE ELMO A.656,066,6,0666 5055 LW.1 VA,A, CITY OF LAKE ELMO STANDARD DETAIL INDEX 540 saPIES saaet:SAA.tte: A61 516,65.0 61,77, 00.4 aarsase,.. Assaq, AS,A A.Areta. Fr: ..../Asaser.= A.. A StAsAaa las Ate-rtars. (Art SA. St SA ASS A.A.: Ata, ASA AAA PAW., (SFS - tatetrearatataaats so, a. aco, 3,56 0565 ,6066,515. 15EL 5 5110, 511 0375 ...IP at. =sage.. -AAA .1( At=s, - trisern ststs.(u Ass at. stats, , A,traAt ta, Au( ..Ase ASA tatt ,A0(071SA 5.605,5611. 60,6 AA 55,Pit. FERRRARY 54045 FIRR4':"' I CITY OF LAKE ELMO IL,IVKEN=CL ' CT_ , - 1,1R-Rjra,;--R5AARee,:fat- Ati 6,6 166 RCIIRRARY AAOLS A16.626,56,6066,5 A1411,I5, t.",14,AA Tr - 6,5o,6,51665 'TA TYPICAL HYDRANT LAYOUT 0.4AAVE tAaili.CaaRAA.1 305045,111111 CITY OF LAKE, ELMO AARA.A.ARA,,,,, 20? 61.66.6. ASAPASAtt, - aVu RR, .300,105 Ate., Artattra ars (6' ,6, RRAtit,LAR RATERRL REDDIRR 00 IR Rata Rat Aa LaRRAR: ALAN., CR/NO.1100I Ittatt, PIPE FOUNDATION DETAILS PIRRAIJARY URI I CITY OF LAKE ELMO i.. ..”1",Aaa At; 65,655 055, , vr,5661.05,06,66,56 04115 ' 66.2 0,6 At ,<Alaa: AS (=At rats, 10,10 Ass, AA, As 80,01 SAVA:- AAA, .A1 ,0055 454 0007. GATE VALVE INSTALLATION FLEINMAR 54541 11,10,540, CITY OE LAKE ELMO WA( a.as Sr ,Astarrt IRS EIZI.VHDIX 4vc, AAA. 11,655,3016,1 404 at{ Olaaaatar/ la, VISO, ,D ill RR:UR STANDAIAD OUTAIL PLAT NA C16 ,r;;" • _ "-- 744451, CONCRETE REACTION BACKING lf(A FFUOI 42113 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 447,444, rAtAtAUON 11A ',LAN WATERMAIN OFFROAD STRUCTURE MARKER !T. [,o7LCIO I); AB ABA) CURL; ARY 32115 CITY OF LAKE ELMO NV ,,VAPP Zt {4,0 ;,22 u ;AARE, 24 VAtAlt, 74/Ai .• I V 5%1,6 {}4MTt ,S,411,1 nrr PAA'ita ifV-Ig. (3, tr,At452,.4 WAIR'ImtiLrA,IR "",;•t'att,'L R"ViR,T5,-.`P;;4",;1-:'..1Wra WATER SERVICE ON DIP MAIN FEBRUARY BOO 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO !EP M1,41. kv, • tia .4Mo ARRs ;2 BA . ;RZ 4440 "--- - I ; 7,i17A • .2 SEC.), 0-, LEX SCE WERT..t. COM4ECT-Us tttl;t2tZttt=j;;;`441`;:t3t7:1:4'.-.174;g;;"'"" SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 301 (R,L r," 4, I FEBRUARY BrUS I CITY OF LAKE ELMO 1.1SE-104, L'AtRA' 224447 22.22.222._ 1:41.61.2Y. Str74 C.ii3 404 010,44444440 IRRIGATION SERVICE FEBRUARY ?Ails CITY OF; LAKE ELMO ELTVR;ICIL 108 Ak SANITARY SEWER OFFROAD STRUCTURE PARKER ;222 uptclf.p Y; EAR KEEP/ FEBRUARY 2015 tot, CITY OF LAKE ELMO 311 45' tt fi t;; t 6- an 751,D RA; 4,1Thr, NOW r1,,,05 SAA22 BE aytti-€ uSE FsE,”ato to, WATERMAIN OFFSET FEBRUARY /00 CITY OF LAKE ELM 11.7 ra.4 j 1. :TINA J2AB,; 112! ,.•;:eict I ttuttAltattu-,2, 't 2,t-';i22.24•&41,?2tI22.2; "- 2-,2-21 rEHROARY 14143 AI,/ MEER • 5i.: Elth`httiON 11=10.11, I MAY., r1.1- 4 0(1LEA j • ttt,"?.7,`,71,t•P"'"` 40498 0170012011 2.22 111115 SANITARY SEWER SERVICE CIT1' STANDAR D DETAIL PLATES 1 LR,t1_] CITY OF LAKE ELMO 31A C 17 Mei/ 111. FERRVIRY ;143 FEBRVARY RR, CITY OF LAKE ELIO° " 44444 44444 STORM SEWER MANHOLE, TYPE 4C7 FEBRUARY 4Pli C!TY OF LAKE ELMO uh CITY OF LAKE ELMO RIPRAP AT RCP OUTLETS 4441 ';2E;;1‘2" CITY OF LAKE ELMO 411 . tat tit, FEBRUARY 1441,4 FFRRIIARY 1,449 CITY OF LAKE ELMO TYPICAL POND SECTION t4140RUARY 2015 [ CITY OF LAKE ELMO t6 CITY OF LAKE ELMO RRBRUARY24415 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 414 t.tttr UM. EIZICktiON ?0, II. tif 3,aa, 4444 444444444404mot 40418 Dit092017 attiffirta. cm' STAN DAR r, DETAIL rlATEN 144;44; C18 011 0, —11 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT '71 --\7! (Prepq BETAftit Etratit4r441Epf: 1,11 1 1 1* XS,* RAN 14.04 70 ,Atkv,S: .0,, t0 DRAIN TILE CONNECTIONS 7015 FEBRUAtty 4t11.5 CflY OF LAKE ELMO 41. kt,"1.11.5.1 I --- 4:1,1x) a I " 44r04..4 0-4 CONCRETE VALLEY CUTTER I LJJ CITY OF LikKE ELMO 4its ; CITY OF LAKE ELMO 0,4 4ttit Isi I' p // / ' —1 .4 1 — 1‘ WIWI IR I - CATCH BASIN PLACEMENT AND CURB & CUTTER TRANSITION AT INTERSECTIONS trlint:Akty 20E5 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 51/15 ,0,11a-nA,1 , 3le 1.4.04:34 1.612 14.(41)1 1,4618 CONCRETE CURB R CUTTER itEohLuARy :art J MY OF LAKE ELMO ,501 :AEA 1 t.4, ,r, f, Si, S.,, ,...0 L.., 7--- i .00.11 ai — 12=0,41. "- 4/.442240022:20-_, - SECNOtt 4k-A RESIDENTIAL DRIVEWAY FPURIIARY 2111S 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 0E5 ett0tr„:„.704.10`,17-40°,4:4,°- ..e.Wistov,04W KA4 f,ttlitettARY 21)$$ preaurE.4 401,4 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 507A F/ 444:44444...."111'010414140.1.17.0.:4°." DE I „INF iRtiPiff:P.rED DOMES CITY OF LAKE ELMO ,1"43 ENI 01.4`440N (Intl ...etttitanctiltitastot t tA 41,1,47--- 4114.1 (11,0512111? Eipi4 j) 7,1 , Et 18076 444 4.4 CITY srAsmRD DUTAili PLATES 0000 C19 —ti - ttcttrtt 2tr .22t-tt ).0,22t. »422'22 '" BICYCLE —PEDESTRIAN PATH FEBRUARY telt , t* CITY OF LAKE ELMO at!ITJirCtZElt2;f"--t4;t2'2422CE LOtt43102 tttti trtet, tr4 CONCRETE CURB MARKING TANI t:t,,tt FEBRUARY 100 Ittitt'itt-tttt,tt CITY OF LAKE ELMO Lrrr '711.;-tt tttstt t I tlt.5 Sftf,3 E.tSt. ty 5 407£ t 2.--ott,22 2,2. 242, 27.2.4,4221 Mt » tt, 22.22,2 Ntttt-t2/2-22, 22222,22-2-,2, tt2-.222,2: 222.2,1» ,ArPz CONCRETE SIDEWALK FEBRUARY 21/13 7. t4.stt, CITY OF LAKE ELMO 313 Dt DAN I , CITY OF LAKE ELMO ; ttrtt 0-22,222:,22.2nt»22,2,, ot 22222 ttg222, 44 SILT FENCE EIF - " 131NANYNNAT WEAF C03113Ft ED...CRAB' DEBAR Ett223-A,...33.9,1•1_ tli_fttt - BlIDEBNIONA BBSE COURSE ADJACENT DETAIL MANHOLE CASTING ADJUSTMENT MBA NARY J1113 / ki CITY OF LAKE ELMO CATCH TEE,Nctt RDEFI FIDEL SECEIND DtTCH CHECK (FIBER ROLL) FEBRUARY 3fli8 FEBRUARY TOIS 22t12 ottt-Ht,t: t CITY OF LAKE ELMO C.Aet.t,het 94. 704 "-tt, .222t-t22-,V2ta ,tott,2225 2t.:22t2s ',22tN't (t‘ qt8'gribt't'it'AV2'-1:1' MILLED LAP JOINT FEBRUARY 101.5 tpttt,'t%.. 1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO F.t.ttt,V,1 -.212( 72r4 44 tar.th tt,o 22,2,4t2 MP, if ,tt 17 470- 5)2 etr4t ' '33 44440. 1413 - OR Ri.,ftit't€t) EDDA, Dttlf,,,rt ,ALVE.,, • WtMCO IFFAINFt CP ABBR.:Bra EDNA. SEDIMENT CONTROL AROUND STORM SEWER INLET FEBRUARY 3.015 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 6E4 JyyJAD -tt131rt..;stistt- '3" I tte".1 reAt2222»211100 llo- 40418 443145121431 18-175 ANI CITY STANDARD DREAD_ Et ARES C20 24,4, 4,4 4.55 M .2,222; 2,22, „s ,s,s2rs ; st :222 ; t;sr,t sr, ,2s ,ssrxsts .2sissx -02, 55 ;550, 5,55 t55 Frta 55t5a, .5,4..5a 510t tRatiNta .005552t 2542.22 5^2N 2, sr, 22.2s r.ss,s2-;ou stst: NE' 5 5,550 5.255.55,1425 t22555a52,55 55'5,25 su,r.22, ato 5,15,55,2,55, altan ,at .5.. TP5 •, ..022-22.2 422, 24 22,22, ..m2srm,224 2r',HE 252. -52 2- OW, 5,52 242,22 mm, Mr, vrm, 540.5555, 55.52 ROCK CONSTRUCI1CN ENTRANCE FEIIRLIAKY 200 Ls4,vc.,1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO tat, ; ;_ , -74- 4T-2442412224,2Z-22- f -!' e 2.2 5.55.5TO tt. 525.555 V' t cittitt555 PA, „Ts st, Ts TYPICAL LOCAL RESIDENTIAL STREET SECTION (Nimuum 7- roti DESIGN) 1-E10111AKY 7.01, ovi2iPT, CITY OF LAKE ELMO 5..525.5,55.2555 55550550 FEUROARY 24115 +.4 tata55,202 rAtEt;a5 PaA. 24222-1 r 1, s 6s2 st, ass. st.tet- ;s j:222_ ta tetaN 6-2t 5.21 C ' t 3 = en' s• :55 5 I 5 - -tita 5.25R 5525 5ift, 221 E311r. 21 F. t.t,E0 25,12,4 - t2 No 'a k 52555.5 or 502..5 cf- 2.5 azrtyltiac, Mo., .5 t5.55 5'2 7.155 5'5,5 - 555L5. , 'tt N5 2.5N 2 N5'52.1 2551:5 Man 5ogarfa t 42,55,4 tC5 20.5255151 F.TNEE2 5552. 51! 52.5' - 5225 5.25,5 12 25 5,55,0 5,72, Pr, 22225 A50.2+ ttNt at4.5 - 1,NA, 55-555 wat, NOrr,22-5 2-5225rtit, po.t _ ttat 15.5.51 "ex 525. STREET SIGNS CITY OF LAKE ELMO 101 I r, • :45 • t I IS !!!a,5-55 ta.5552 t:tt Ow. eau. „ - • : .i }ti.1 taa 5N, 55.5s: Nst.5., Nt545, t - .2.55. ats5 t5:5,N.055.0f {55, t" titigl 55..55 5..5. a5.55 tot. t, tat 54 555,5tat 5. TYPICAL LOCAL RESIDENTIAL RURAL STREET SECTION (MINIMUM 7-;TON DESIGN) V 2nIT 1,2,1°E'`fj CITY OF LAKE ELMO 110 tr27. s!s;22 st;22, q.C. 21(47222SS2 5,5255.5552222t522.2- Z2.4,g2t;',!2:2'Z'422!2C SANITARY. WATER de DRAIN TILE SERVICE INSTALLATION KUHUARY 2015 ! CITY OF LAKE ELMO 6 . 42 4- 2123%2 _Ji TYPICAL RICHT OF WAY LAYOUT KURUAKY 7.015 i CITY OF LAKE ELMO 212 805 t 12.55,25 2-55.5ttta2t T4t!!:',1 :friar T4rtifr5.1.1,112. N52'55 [5,554,' tat ,i..... ',I:1 -1.--..!,'; 1 I. 3.--li, ,,, tr.M.!..24-F-Ifrrra . • .,...,_,..—.--,..-- :';'i ,.., • II! t0555,55r, 54t55, 554,2 1 22 252.! (Iii 2°,2 S.. TA, 11 (0 22.0222, TYPICAL SERVICE PROTECTION FEKCARY 2015 ; CITY OE LAKE ELMO 10 I i 00 n;;,:tst ;52,2;malt URBAN STREET VDU IY FE2PI1LARY 2011 L;12!L CITY OF ELMO LOCATION 213 $46 tv,k4t, 1114'unc ° Es: N°81, 5,412 tettettit'50.01 02498 DIPOW201, CITY STANDAM, DETAIL HAMS C21 PLANTING SCHEDULE OVELEsSI DELI 144EE t Jowel rorle. A.A9313 L1196.0 Ii394 13C WhtO rOL i999,1993n4 Loldon Latta 163043 AL, t 36396 CLE.40136 Je94I A'4C.e treamoto Jef 09,699661' 066960.369 L93.6434 ILA 690633.633 ILA 6963/6.6 SLze ;64:19%6D. 2-1/2" Type ET-13 64.5 B +ET 13+5 -49 _66 - -s- eee tto OTT FEET Legend NOTE: SLIAPIOS. 3.961,6 EF41004414,ZE,041.14,341b0o4O4h, OtIttatttlitt.IOPOL.444t.t£LOtts,40.4'.0 094130660399966649463roo1064699444636693999319066:663991996/ 109666663460696636660/646163119.49630666669666666099966,66096 stah9964066.6944,469139619999166ttats04669496664943649.6964 sor9.366466trart666941969,3666643946.4. DONUO04141,4140441.11ttrAT.4.1 PkOkatratOSSOMOOMOXXXOYST COOOttOte.4.040DOWOM1OfttOtit 0.13.011TAAM SWAMI. $.4010.40•14t FRO*IttowIttekrOotnt 04030E OiNtokSINO ait1440. =EC. 960669 titAtIttaUmetvo, trostmtoot, tricafiCitOri OTA1V356 O onO,014,141.6141,474.4014 544140..4144474104,01trttatt MOM/ Atitt,thOtti =Or 41-eltEtti 44. tatataittletOttentACETOOOE WilitAtI4Ottrt,4104EVORCOun 0140,1,404.rtattittO4HIO OntOCOttl.010.401401tt 04,444,304.4 t ttt VOOtttYnt etOlOttiaatOi AtOWO,VW0E1741OtttOti 0.404,144 .14.041.11441t£B44447£4 POotIM ttmootlut art - tixttOLA..441:104tOtOtaartrio. OlattafttektAttnt. otaitirebtOitettOttE091.11rOOT abe ittattflA.tOttEttAtItCTOP 6,10 tow TREtt.ltit-Ole O., M.O. VOW*. OtteUtOt CAlIMI4e tir MEROOT 5.4444441,04. Ott... aolf7tH Sto334 Lit466466$4966133.41•49t39363 ttf Ott1OttM14,410,44F0,011tlitttlettO00.141 etirnA00711,7441000CAVOJOICAPECIAtt Ing4tottoOtiIROONAt 1541,01.0,4440004 — RtOIMRESO11µ114ttOtALONA.Ottort DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING DETAIL - SECTION 91T to 33AT ER I D16.43 0 DI' IC,114.11, 1466.144t944634961 tOhlttsorixtoto taloa 6.64601430.446 49669993646406mort. 40639 0067/2013 13. 16375 1 6 C. k 6 1 _ A ots511 NV AGE 2 INSET A ^1.• t '-•4',.: ',1,‘ - ••0 •„i; _,„.,. * '','IT ,1 1 •, 0 • - -s•,, , — , 01-. , ' ,' ,,, ixan ' „,,,-; 01'4 •,‘,,, \ 06.74,74F ITI `hON 311 tionh Ws Sant; Saha 291 Salaam, Masao. 55anal Mot nna)3944 amv.tticksontiwilsktxam I Masa *Er "EMSEPASAErTaY. LEGEND NOTES v "Tanana, Gi tidait M.. 645. Ost, EASEMENT OETAII, troun E.-001,11, AMI SII(1141.1TIV, 13 a "1,`4,1"Z‘Vg=_RIT.AVVAM'''' a-anna Vfl 1,sny asTstanwana ainnin ?via a EAST VIIILAGE 2 INSET B 613k76 A.18016`38"' C8='1\109*3554W I N. 630-0.33 ,l,t1031 ViYhO818.43, ITI L=306,24 A=18°16.39" CB=N09°35'54"W C=304.95 NO01r3419 205.83 i„ I", v v I : El.!ICKSON CIVIL 333 Nosh MAD SADA SAD 241 SAbDirr. USDA. DAD DAD 012)3P-36,14 www.criaaanciAlsite.com z t EWA .0 AEI WPW4StALE WPM' LEGEND rs's'"..4M47, ustv DA, sAsiv. NOTES ,„ , • „ ,....... „ t:MTOM,11,4(3 AnDtTliN SRir.F.T gorSULL,5 LEGEND P,:orC11,:now:Dvt: 1,Z72,7e.„1=,,W"m" DEVELOPMENT stANDOS 444.1$1:f it.1-314AWAPOW1151 t.,Mt KIM EYK,A01: Wm:Lin-1.TX gtt fianKINN M14,4#EMEAStisiN: .14,0"140. M.:EICISCE MurtataValINFIV:41.01.01 : ‘:0£ NOTES ktiF.R.11et:=SSrszy ArkAr:404,74.M.E1101..* VV.:MA.3 awe., ,s1 r.r.altftwnlm:1:4-twxr.a. EII.ICRSON CIVIL OMG.41E, P£ 40418 01(1712017 13-114 s-ki I Tin: PRELIMINARY PLA SITE PLAN REVISION P 1 SCHILTEEN REID PARK MINER & LAMPERT N28221412 44(4.04 OUTLOT J EASTON VSLACE, LLC FUTURE 0E2E408104T - 12 12 4277:A77 ,..... —, 's . , k...A .27 ,C1 1ilss t=is EllAD142„.4,2442, LEGEND IsfitPERTY/0.14//11 watz="UMIWO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS sYlin,13 /s/s/Atailtl/s. r, Fillerts/StrAlat Iliststintlars/itr ittft/./.41stist tir...ltstiMrststossItt ti/E. tst/11t1 A.AZEStrtlet 6.1.1,, istat1/14./l/111/1120194,1,/.1“.... •tta/415tOntrts.M....arPtstitio1 tetsatitg.tollitsEAS/Salit.rtsift/......1 tristist.,1,11.1 NOTES qr../10.4488StftliCtssiliksrt..../NOrstlitellill/0/4./../o1l44.1.$0/1 trsrlertt tuot/../St../tstiritttlfrsts/...0.11.1itilt.titir4f/sZesis,./.1.10/11{..../.1.1.0 1....%)../XS/4.1.t.l.ttrst.friltrtsrt rav,n PrOtgalls/Atts..1‘..../is./.04/CorrOlg. El2143088,7 /it..., rlo, mil Iss.vordass8228.844 lltrAssittte /Wiles IC/KR/0.M rilortt /WE, rottr,pranivenen I 2. 13-114 PRELIMINARY PLAT SITE PLAN REVISION PR2 ggaP•s: i $; N ERILPEIELEITRE 0%Kid:c• :.•s,,:rnR,rexirus a+e: e= e m ,s s.<r. vaesxtw p.s sm EnVE3e,M+zxnn,r t, NEEEENIEn SE, Elm En1 rcxru.,taniilarr. 13.114 PRET, IMINARY PLAT UTILITY REVISION P 3 NOO°OO'S8"E 424.41 EASTON VILLAGE EASTON VILLAGE, LLC - PRELIMINARY PLAT REV 2140 COONI Y ROAD 42 WEST LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA BURNSVILLE. MN 55337 6 44 et 33 1 3h r'#t� t.t44�3s} 14 64 14 t 14 EASTON VILLAGE PRELIMINARY PLAT REV. LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA EASTON VILLAGE, LLC 2140 COUNTY ROAO 42 WEST 6URNSVILLE, MN 55347 71-e roma* 'immomp4maavomommumeanwR " womelanomomomomm mwormasowa* mom* momoomimu mommio mwoommematwomswwwwwomm momma,,n.***ftw000x sola A tvezimi EASTON VILLAGE PRELIMINARY PLAT KE ELMO. MINNESOTA I A±ArtAlfALOIE EASTON VILLAGE, LLC 2140 COUNTY ROAD 42 NEST RuPoisvILLE., MN 55337 LL' 441 .44 4.1v — 4,4 4444 $.44iI4‘ PRELIMINARY PLAT 2140 COUNTY ROAD 42 WEST LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA euRNsvILLE. nam 53337 ' ,perem.,s4n, EASTON VILLAGE EASTON VILLAGE, LLC EASTON VILLAGE PRELIMINARY PLAT 7 LAKE ELMO MINNESOTA 25 25 05 EASTON VILLAGE, LLC zmo COUNTY ROAD 42 WEST BURNSVILLE. MN 55337 4E6 73 90 rn — Xg• rri 7gi S00005YW 3 2.7 or# 1. 001 01 0 10 44 4 " ,00 004, :33,..33 tipt" 100 40 01 40 ° ria rgg, 'LI 400 4740 ,!1 WM 1 0 1 1014 041" 044 44/ 1114 10100 11.44 4441 ;F1 PRELIMINARY PLAT 2140 COUNTY RUM) 42 WEST LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA BURNSVILLE MN 5537 NOO°00'58"E 489.90 0.001440041410 1044 1.4114 S00°0058"W 330.00 NOO°00'58"E tr 100 WI 0. . 1014 Sgg Vtg. 040 0 0 19..\ gk.gg EASTON VILLAGE EASTON VILLAGE, LLC 424.41 t tttt „:„ NSA .12.2 2222, .17.2,25 MT, tt:013 434 3324 74,14 :34 1,1 484 4,1 320 12233310 ,2" .22 813 !!' t it :45 t ttt 15tti 22 - :tt -• ttt 4,1 0,421 roNO o Nov. 3233 Ora lad 2332324 33232140 .4.. A 1322 MEM/a C 2.133 q282223113, < .34 --- ttt t 1 • 24 EASTON VILLAGE PRELIMINARY PLAT LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA 43884348 ko. 83324.228 2.4 4,1 .„, 8.1222,4 .r„ A Oa 4.0 EVA ..a 8$83743J VAN 13 Lni t — „ 3308.3t 323241341,21')" ttt 443 13 tt; „ -i--1:11- tt" 22-X , 13 ft EASTON VILLAGE, LLC 2140 COUNTY ROAD 42 WEST BURNSVILLE, MN 5533? bin 5.4 541, 1 51 08. 3131434 tt; # # ft. 4,1, A sr 5 t 13082 t 2,422 1.1. 82'...1E,4g ; WE VIII 5 g5t55.4 5 5,5-55 ., .. 74, Ig.Em 4413 - 038 N a No "SHPN000 kg-W-1/ 5 5 832.33032 ?„' £ P.15,521,4 ALIGNMENT 7 (LOCAL ROAD) 1131 5; 114 0 a Iffi W30.16,3 911 .14MAI1A.,11 FV514.5„5 440'4034G'6 31 31 31 31 31 .14 31 3 1 311 31 , 1 3 1 31, 111 '4.45007111111 0+3.1111. 1.1111114 111 2 nItt,11a1 eLs - 1 -- a a e5 a a 353 4. 1o3 ERICICSON 011' Si. 44.703755*3173 aNal, ei1.6113w 04311111113030E 36111,46,11? f1,0,5M1EVM OAP., ca,,,marr so 111312115 „ 13,114 PRELIMINARY PLAT ROAD PROFILE REVISION PR1 1 0 QusinessItenn—EastonViUage 2Final Plat Becker started her presentation for Easton Village IFinal Plat. This addition isfor l9 single tannUy lots /n the 217 unit development. Prior to approval of Final Plat, Preliminary Plans were updated to meet conditions of Preliminary Plat approval, Revisions to these plans were required in order to address the following: l) reconfigure temp access 2) grading plan revisions 3) Adjustments to property Boundaries 4) Slightly larger buffer from railroad tracks 5) revisions to stVrnnw/ater nngnnt. plan. The applicant has increased the number of lots for the Zn»Addition Final Plat application from 18, as proposed inPreliminary Plat, 1o19and there isadecrease inlot size. The developer has also removed atrail and out{ot. There is9.84acres ofrequired parkland dedication. 3.99 acres were dedicated with V addition which leaves a remaining 5.85 acres of cash payment /nlieu o[land. The developer was required toagain update the preliminary plans prior to reviewing the 2 nd Addition Final Plat to reflect the lot size and number chan8es. The issues with the landscape plans are asfollows l)there isn0landscaping shown on Village Parkway 2\there are no utility locations 3\ irrigation plans needed for ROW area 4) landscape maintenance agreement needed for ROW areas 5) condition of approval landscape plans updated and approved by City Landscape Architect. Staff is reviewing the Village Parkway Plan and the landscaping plans may be modified based on that review, The final plat is generally compliant with preliminary plat with the following exceptions 1) plan revision and proper permits required 2) parkland dedication is required and needs to be re-evaluated with trail and outlot being eliminated 3) #14 distribution of future costs associated with Village Parkway railroad crossing improvements tobe determined as part of developer's agreement 4) #17 applicant is proposing eliminating trail connection, Dodson isconcerned with the elimination of the trail connection. They pushed at preliminary plat kzhave that and doesn't know why itwas removed, Becker stated that the trail connection was discussed at the Park Commission and they didn't see a problem with it. Dodson asked about condition #7 encouraging builders to incorporate interior noise reduction measures. Dodson iswondering ifthat had been done inphase i VVensnoan stated that heisnot aware ofifthat ishappening ornot. Kreinne/asked ifthere was anet increase ofthe development with the extra lot for pAaseU. Becker stated that the overall development would still be2l7units. Kreirner asked about the Village Parkway and why /tdid not get built completely to2»daddition asrequired with the first phase, Tnnn Wolter, Easton Village Developer, they are eliminating the trail, however, there is still sidewalks in the cul-de-sac that connects to the other sidewalks in development. By Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4-24-17 7 eliminating the trail, they have a variety of lot widths and can accommodate different home types. People also like the privacy ofnot having atrail atthe end ofthe cu|de' sac. Dodson asked ifthere was away toput the trail between 2other lots. Wolter stated that this segment of trail really doesn't connect to anything. Dodson asked about the sound abatement. Wolter stated that would goback tothe building department, Dodson asked ifthe builders are being encouraged tudoany sound abatement, Wolter stated that there islanguage inthe HOAagreement regarding the airport. There isnoagreement between the developer and the builders. Dodson isconcerned about the trail being removed os the discussion aLpreliminary plat was for connectivity. Williams doesn't think the trail should be removed. He thinks it does provide connectivity between the sidewalk and the cul-de-sac and Village Parkway. Hedoesn't buy the argument for privacy because the houses are so big and s0close together that there isn't privacy anyway. Dorschner feels that because the houses are so close, the trail should be removed because there really isn't aneed with sidewalks onboth sides. Hefeels the trail is intrusive into the yards of those 2 lots and the lots would be hard to sell with the easement. Larson is looking atthis more as aiu/isdichona| issue. The Park Commission has seen this and reviewed this and they said that itcould betaken out. Larson feels it is more the decision of the Park Commission. Williams recalls that the Park Commission isn't infavor oftrails et the end ofany [u|'de-5acand hedoesn't agree with their position. Williams stated that there are many sidewalks and trails that go along the side of houses. Fields does not like to see an amenity that was approved at preliminary plat removed when itcomes tofinal plat. However, hedoes not see agreat functionality of that piece oftrail. Hehas mixed feelings about it. Kreinnerisinfavor oftrails atthe end of cul-de-sacs, but he is in favor of getting a better variety of lots in this development. Williams stated that there is an easy way to get more variety and that would be to put smaller homes onsome ofthese lots. Williams made friendly amendment to add tofinding #Ithe elimination ofthe trail at the cu|'de'sactothe parkway, accepted byDorschner. K4/S/P: Dorsch ner/Lu ndq u ist, move to recommend approval of the Easton Village 2'd Addition Final Plat with the 10 conditions of approval as drafted by staff and amended: Vote: 6-1, motion carried. Williams asked ifany ofthe conditions mentioned that trail. Becker stated that the trail was acondition ofapproval for preliminary plat approval. Williams asked ifany ofthe findings for this approval address taking out that trail. VVensnoanstated that afinding might bebeneficial. Dodson feels itiscovered asfinding #3states issues identified in staff report. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4-24-17 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2017-040 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A FINAL PLAT FOR EASTON VILLAGE 2") ADDITION WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, Chase Development, 2140 West County Road 42, Burnsville, MN has submitted an application to the City of Lake Ehno ("City") for a Final Plat for Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat, a copy of which is on file in the City of Lake Elmo Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the Easton Village Sketch Plan was reviewed by the Planning Commission on January 7, 2014 and approved by City Council on February 5, 2014; and WHEREAS, the City approved the Easton Village Preliminary Plat subject to 21 conditions; and WHEREAS, the proposed Easton Village rd Addition includes 19 single family residential lots within the Easton Village 217 unit residential development; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Easton Village 2n1 Addition Final plat at its April 24, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending approval of the Final Plat subject to 11 conditions of approval; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and recommendation concerning the Final Plat as part of a memorandum to the City Council for its May 2, 2017 meeting; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Easton Village 2' Addition Final Plat at its meeting held on May 2, 2017 and made the following findings: 1) That all the requirements of City Code Section 153.07 related to the Final Plan and Final Plat have been met by the Applicant. That the proposed Final Plat for Easton Village consists of the creation of 19 single-family detached residential structures and the elimination of the trail from the cul-de-sac to Village Parkway. Resolution 2017-040 3) That the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat is generally consistent with the Preliminary Plat and Plans as approved by the City of Lake Elmo on July 15, 2014 and as amended to comply with conditions of preliminary plat approval with the exceptions of issues identified in the April 24, 2017 Staff report to the Planning Commission, 4) That the Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. 5) That the Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential zoning district regulations. 6) That the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water, sediment and erosion control and other ordinances with the exception of issues identified in the April 24, 2017 Staff report to the Planning Commission. 7) That the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. 8) That the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat is generally consistent with the City's engineering standards with the exception of necessary plan revisions outlined by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated April 12, 2017. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve the Easton Village 2nd Addition Final Plat subject to the following conditions: 1) Final grading, drainage, and erosion control plans, sanitary and storm water management plans, landscape plans, and street and utility construction plans shall be reviewed and approved by the City Engineer and applicable Staff prior to the recording of the Final Plat. All changes and modifications to the plans requested by the City Engineer in the memorandums addressing Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat and Easton Village 2"d Addition Construction Plan Review dated April 12, 2017 in the memo shall be incorporated into these documents before they are approved. 2) Prior to the execution of the Final Plat by City officials, the Developer shall enter into a Developer's Agreement acceptable to the City Attorney and approved by the City Council that delineates who is responsible for the design, construction, and payment of the required improvements for the Easton Village 2"d Addition Final Plat with financial guarantees therefore. 3) All easements as requested by the City Engineer and Public Works Department shall be documented on the Final Plat prior to its execution by City Officials. 4) The Applicant shall submit an updated Landscape Plan that is consistent with Preliminary Landscape Plans; shows utility locations; shows irrigation plans; and includes the right -a- way area along Village Parkway. The updated plans will need to be approved by the City's Landscape Architect. A Landscape Maintenance Agreement will need to be provided for all City right-of-way areas. Resolution 2017-040 5) Temporary easements for the temporary cul-de-sacs shall be executed and recorded on the City standard easement agreement form. 6) The applicant shall provide a disclosure statement to all first homeowners in the development advising of the airport and associated over -flights. 7) All builders shall be encouraged to incorporate interior noise reduction measures into single family residential structures within the subdivision based on the Metropolitan Council's Builder Guide. 8) The proposed access to Manning Avenue will be permitted as a temporary access until such time that the Village Parkway is connected to 30th Street or 5 years has passed from the date of final plat approval of the lst Addition (March 23, 2020), whichever is longer. The developer's agreement for Easton Village shall include appropriate financial securities concerning the future cost for removal of the temporary access. 9) Approval by the Valley Branch Watershed District is needed for revised stormwater plans. 10) That the Preliminary Plat and Preliminary Plans be revised and approved by the City prior to accepting applications for future phases of the development for Final Plat. Passed and duly adopted this 2' day of May, 2017 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk Resolution 2017-040 IA IN CITY OF LAKE ELMO TO: FROM: AGENDA ITEM: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: STAFF REPORT DATE: 5/2/2017 REGULAR ITEM #: 10 MOTION City Council Emily Becker, City Planner Zoning Map Amendment Rezoning Select Parcels within Village to VMX — Village Mixed Use Stephen Wensinan, Planning Director City Staff has received a number of request from property owners within areas currently zoned GB — General Business and guided for VMX — Village Mixed Use to further develop or make improvements to their properties. A number of these requests have or would require rezoning to VMX, as the proposals did not meet the requirements of the GB — General Business District but did meet the requirements of the VMX — Village Mixed Use District, a more flexible zoning district. Many infrastructure improvements have been made to the Old Village including availability of city sewer and additional stommater management. Rezoning to VMX is also a priority on the 2017 Planning Commission Work Plan. For these reasons, Staff and the Planning Commission are requesting that the Council consider a Zoning Map Amendment rezoning select parcels within the Village to VMX — Village Mixed Use. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: The Council should review and consider adoption of an ordinance approving a Zoning Iap Amendment rezoning select parcels within the Old Village to VMX — Village Mixed Use. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYS1S: Properties Proposed to be Rezoned. The attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 24, 2017 further details the properties being proposed to be rezoned. At this time, no properties guided for VMX and zoned Rural Single Family will be rezoned to VMX. Planning Commission and Public Hearing. The Planning Commission held two public hearings regarding the proposed rezoning. The initial public hearing was held on March 27, 2017 and proposed only properties currently zoned GB — General Business District that were guided for Village Mixed Use in the Comprehensive Plan. Upon receiving feedback from this public hearing notice, Staff learned that there were a number of Zoning Map errors which designated commercial properties as either right-of-way or Rural Single Family zoning, and thus these properties were not published in the original public hearing notice. Staff then published an additional public hearing notice and held an additional public hearing on April 24, 2017 to capture these missing properties. Continents from the public hearing included concern over the density designated for the Village Mixed Use land use category and the desire to preserve existing single- City Council Meeting 5/2/2017 Regular Agenda item #10 family homes within the Village. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of Ord. 08-176 with an affirmative vote of 7-0. FISCAL IMPACT: RezoningRezoriing the recommended parcels to Village Mixed Use zoning will allow property owners to redevelop or make improvements to their property in accordance with VMX standards, thereby allowing greater flexibility. Not having to go through the process or pay the application fee for a Zoning Map Amendment may further incent property owners to make improvements that otherwise may not be allowed under current standards. OPTIONS: The Council may: • Adopt Ord. 08-176 as proposed. • Amend Ord. 08-176 and adopt as amended. • Deny adoption of Ord. 08-176. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the Council adopt Ord. 08-176, approving a Zoning Map Amendment rezoning select parcels to VMX - Village Mixed Use: "Move to adopt Ord. 08-176, approving a Zoning Map Amendment rezoning select parcels to VMX - Village Mixed Use." ATTACHMENTS: • Ord. 08-176 • Planning Commission 4.24.2017 Meeting Packet — Item 4a. • Planning Commission 4.24.2017 Meeting Minutes pertaining to ZMA VMX • Current and Proposed Zoning Page 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-176 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby ordains the following properties to be rezoned from GB - General Business to VMX - Village Mixed Use: PIDs: 1302921230055 1302921320001 1302921320052 1302921210010 1302921120013 1302921230057 1302921230038 1302921320026 1302921320012 1302921120010 1302921230058 1302921230037 1302921230007 1302921240022 1302921120016 1302921320021 1302921320019 1302921320046 1302921220007 1302921120012 1302921230068 1302921210013 1302921230059 1302921220023 1302921120009 1302921320025 1302921210014 1302921310017 1302921220018 1302921120011 1302921230070 1302921210011 1302921210016 1302921220016 1302921120015 1302921320049 1302921210012 1302921310016 1302921220017 1302921120014 1302921320051 1302921210015 1302921230046 1302921220019 1302921220008 1302921320048 1302921320041 1302921230065 1302921220022 1302921220010 1302921320047 1302921320042 1302921230053 1302921220021 1302921240016 1302921240020 1302921320083 1302921240024 1302921220020 1302921220012 1302921310003 1302921230054 1302921240019 1302921240021 1302921230071 1302921230056 1302921210001 1302921240017 1302921210006 1302921210007 1302921320032 1302921320005 1302921230067 1302921220002 1302921220013 1302921320027 1302921230025 1302921240025 1302921220011 1302921220014 1302921230063 1302921230036 1302921210009 1302921230004 1302921210002 1302921320022 1302921230062 1302921230064 1302921320086 1302921320007 1302921320009 1302921320008 1302921320010 1302921320085 1302921320096 1302921320094 1302921230077 1302921230027 1302921230018 1302921230026 1302921230010 SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo also hereby ordains that the Zoning Administrator shall make the applicable changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 4. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-176 was adopted on this 2nd day of May, 2017, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-176 was published on the day of , 2017. 2 "VHF C:ITY Or LAKE ELM() STAFF REPORT DATE: 03/27/2017 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM #: 4a TO: Planning Commission FROM: Emily Becker, Planner AGENDA ITEM: Rezoning Old Village GB — General Business District to VMX — Village Mixed Use District REVIEWED BY: Stephen Wensrnan, Planning Director BACKGROUND: Creation of VMX District. In November of 2013, creation of the Village Mixed Use District was approved in support of the 2030 Comprehensive Plan update for the Village Planning Area, The Village Mixed Use District was created to replace the existing intermingling of conimercial, residential, and public zoning classifications within the central portion of the Village area. While the creation of the District was approved, the majority of the area for which it was meant has not yet been rezoned. Currently, the majority of the parcels that are planned for VMX - Village Mixed Use zoning are still zoned GB — General Business. Only three parcels within the City have been rezoned to VMX thus far. Former Planning Commission Review of Rezoning GB Parcels to VMX. The Planning Commission discussed rezoning all parcels zoned GB — General Business District within the Old Village to VMX — Village Mixed Use in June of 2016. The meeting minutes of this meeting are attached for reference. Summarily, the Commission was not in favor at that time of this mass rezoning for concern of the following: • That the densities within this area are guided too high. • That VMX district standards are less restrictive (higher maximum impervious surface, additional permitted uses, smaller minimum building setbacks, etc.) than the GB district standards. • That Form Based Code should be created for the Village. Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #4a That updated population and development projections for the areas guided for VMX in the Old Village are needed. Reconsideration Requested. At its February 27, 2017 meeting, the Commission again discussed rezoning parcels within the Old Village from GB to VMX. This discussion was prompted by a number of requests from residents to further develop or make improvements on their properties located within the GB — General Business zoning district. Staff has found that a number of these requests required rezoning to VMX, as the proposals did not meet the minimum requirements of the GB — General Business District but did meet the requirements of the VMX — Village Mixed Use District. Many infrastructure improvements have been made to the Old Village including availability of city sewer and additional stormwater management. For these reasons, and because updating the Zoning Map to change Village parcels to VMX consistent with the Comprehensive Plan is an item on the 2017 Planning Department Work Plan, Staff would like the Planning Commission to re -review rezoning GB parcels within the Old Village to VMX. ISSUE BEFORE PLANNING COMMISSION: The Planning Comrnission should consider rezoning the parcels currently zoned GB - General Business District to VMX - Village Mixed Use. It should also consider removal of 154.034: GB — General Business from the Zoning Code, along with all other references within the Code to the GB — General Business zoning district, as this district will no longer exist on the Zoning Map. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Reason for Requesting Zoning Map Amendment Now vs. at Time of Development Application. in order to ensure that the property is being developed according the Comprehensive Plan, rezoning will typically occur at the time of a development application if a parcel is not zoned in accordance with the Comprehensive Plan. However, as previously mentioned, there are many non -conforming parcels within the GB — General Business zoning district which cannot further develop or, in some cases, make simple improvements, as a non- conformity may not be expanded. Rezoning these parcels will allow for owners to further develop and/or make improvements without having to submit application and go through a public hearing and approval process. Number of Parcels Currently in the GB — General Business District. According to data provided in the City's Zoning Map, there are currently 83 parcels that are zoned GB — General Business District. It should be noted that only those properties currently zoned GB are proposed to be rezoned to VMX. There are some RS - Rural Single Family -zoned parcels that are guided for VMX, however, these are not proposed to be rezoned. Page 2 Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #4a Comparison Tables of Two Ordinances. In general, the proposed rezoning will allow a higher degree of flexibility for site improvements and land development in the Village than is presently permitted under the current ordinance. The following outlines differences in lot dimensions, setback requirements, and permitted uses in the two districts. Staff has also provided a complete draft the GB and VMX District regulations for review. Permitted and Conditional Use Comparison. The following shows that there are a number of uses that the VMX district either permits or allows with a conditional use permit that the GB district does not. In some cases, the VMX is actually more restrictive, in that it requires a conditional use permit for some uses that the GB district permits. It should be noted that cun-ent properties that currently employ any of these land uses would not he required to obtain a conditional use pennit for such uses unless an expansion of the use was proposed or if the use was discontinued for more than a year. The VMX district permits the following uses that the GB district does not allow: • Single Family Detached • Single Family Attached • Two Family • Live Work Unit • Wayside Stand • Temporary Sales as Accessory Use • Parking Facility as Accessory Use • Solar Equipment as Accessory Use The VMX districts allows the following conditional uses that the GB district does not allow: • Multi Family • Secondary Dwelling • Congregate Housing • Semi -Transient Accommodations • Schools • Funeral Horne • Lodging • Trade Shop • Farmer's Market • Gas Station • Parking Facility • Outdoor Recreation Facility • Parks and Open Areas • Indoor Athletic Facility • Broadcasting or Communication Facility Page 3 Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 2017 Public Heaving Item #4a The VMX district requires a Conditional Use Permit for the following uses that the GB district permits (does not require a Conditional Use Permit): • Group Residential Facility/Nursing and Personal Care (the GB district permits a Boarding Care Facility with 15 residents max) • Public Assembly • Religious Institutions • Medical Facility • Membership Organization • Repair and Maintenance Shop • Veterinary Services • Restaurant with Drive Thru • Garden Center • Shopping Center • Automobile Maintenance Service • Sales and Storage Lots • Indoor Recreation (the GB district allows Family Entertainment Centers (no definition provided)) • Bed and Breakfast as Accessory Use • Group Family Day Care as Accessory Use Lot Dimension and Setback Requirements Comparison. The table below compares the minimum lot size requirements of the GB General Business District to those of the VMX District and provides analysis on the differences. Standard V1B Millin111171 • 1.5 acres Lot Area VMX • Non -Residential Use: None • Single Family Detached Dwelling: 5,000 sf • Two -Family Dwelling (per unit): 3,000 sf • Single -Family Attached (per unit): 2,500 sf • Multi -Family Dwelling (per unit): 1,800 sf • Live -Work Unit: 3,000 sf The minimum lot size requirement of 1.5 acre most likely assumed that properties within the GB district would not be sewered. The entire Village Area is now within the MUSA, and lots of this size are no longer necessary to provide wastewater treatment. It should also be noted that properties that further subdivide would be required to rezone to VMX and would need to adhere to the standards or the VMX district. Paue 4 Planning C0111111iSSiOn Meeting MCIXin111111 Lot Area • None Minimum • 150 ft Lot Width Setbacks • Front: 0 ft. for Old • Interior Side: 0 ft. for Old Village • Side (Corner): 50 ft. • Rear: 50 ft. Maximum • 35 ft Building Height MaXi11111111 Impervious Col'erage • Up to 4 acres: 40% • >4-8 acres: 35% • 8 acres: 25 % March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #4a • Other Structures: 3,500 sf • Residential Structures: None • Other Structures: 5 acres • Single Family Detached Dwelling: 50 ft • Two -Family Dwelling (per unit): 30 ft. • Single -Family Attached (per unit): 25 ft. • Multi -Family Dwelling (per building): 75 ft. • Live -Work Unit: 25 ft. • Front: 0-20 ft. (25 ft for single family homes) • Interior Side: 10 ft. (for properties abutting residential uses) • Side (Corner): 0 ft. (or maintain front setback of adjacent property adjoining street) • Rear: 10 ft. 35 ft/3 stories Residential Structures: 75 % • Other Structures: No Limit There are 50 parcels within the GB district that do not meet its minimum lot size requirement. This would also only be applicable when a property further subdivided, which would already necessitate a rezoning from GB to VMX. The VMX minimum lot width requirements are smaller than those of the GB district, as the minimum lot size requirements of the VMX district are much smaller. There are approximately 20 parcels within the GB district that do not meet the minimum lot width requirement. This item has been discussed at previous Planning Commission meetings, The VMX ordinance is undergoing revisions, and the Planning Commission has suggested that because of the street design of some areas within the Village, there should be certain defined areas of the VMX that have a build -to setback. Standard does not change. Many lots within the GB district do not meet the maximum impervious surface requirement. The Village has increased stonnwater management efforts, and storrnwater management plans will be evaluated upon the receipt of land use applications. Page 5 Planning Commission Meeti Lot Config- uration Septic Drainage Regulation • Maximum • None depth to width ratio no more than 3:1 • 20,000 sf • None dedicated for septic March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #zla It is difficult to know without having exact impervious surface calculations, but one can see by looking from an aerial that a vast majority of parcels within the GB district do not meet the maximum impervious surface requirement. All GB parcels within the Village would be required to be sewered eventually, as they are in the MUSA. This standard is no longer applicable. Density. The Comprehensive Plan guides the Village Mixed Use area for a density of 5-10 residential equivalency units per acre. Maximum lot size and no minimum lot size requirement for the VMX district help to accomplish this higher density. Form Based Code. Staff is also cognizant of the fact that the Planning Commission is in support of implementing a Form Based Zoning for the VMX District, as is supported in the Comprehensive Plan. Creation of a draft of a form -based code for the VMX zoning district is currently on the 2017 Planning Department Workplan. The Commission should consider if it is necessary for Form Based Code to be adopted before rezoning Village parcels to VMX. It should be noted that the City can do nothing, short of enacting a moratoria, to prevent further development within the area guided for VMX until a Form Based Code is adopted. The goal of rezoning these parcels is to make non-confol ming parcels conforming. General Business District References No Longer Required in the Zoning Code. Currently, the only parcels zoned GB — General Business are located in the Old Village. Rezoning these parcels to VMX — Village Mixed Use will leave the GB — General Business District non-existent on the Zoning Map. Therefore, Staff is recommending that Section 034, GB — General Business be removed along with all other references to this zoning district. Public Hearing Notices — Additional Consideration Requested. A public hearing notice was published in the official City newspaper, and public hearing notices were sent out to property owners within 350 feet of all properties zoned GB — General Business District. Staff received a number of inquiries about the rezonings, asking for clarification. One resident was not in support Page 6 Planning Commission Meeting March 27, 2017 Public ten 4a the rezonings, citing concerns of increased density and the ability for homeowners not being able to keep a single family home. As previously mentioned in this report, GB -zoned parcels are still guided for VMX, which means that a rezoning would need to occur when the property develops, and any development may occur at the density which the Comprehensive Plan dictates. Additionally, existing single family detached homes are a permitted use in the VM.X. Another comment that was received was that there are still a number of parcels that are guided for VMX that were not zoned GB — Genera] Business District (currently either zoned RS — Rural Single Family, RT — Rural Development Transitional, or had no zoning classification on the City's Zoning Map), even though the land use of some of these parcels is not a single family home. Staff has looked further in to this and have found that the following parcels are zoned RS but are guided for VMX, yet are not used as single family homes. Please note that this list does not include land that is guided for VMX yet is still used as single family homes. If the Commission wishes to recommend rezoning all parcels that are guided for VMX to VMX, a motion can be made to do so. PID# Address Description 1302921230010 None Small strip of land south of and owned by same owner as 3699 Laverne Avenue North (vacant) 1302921230026 None Small strip of land north of and owned by same owner as 3520 Laverne Avenue North (vacant) 1302921230027 3520 Laverne Ave N Industrial Use per Washington County Use Description 1302921230077 11127 Stillwater Blvd N Lake Elmo Oil 1302921320007 None Small strip of land near 33rd St N (vacant) 1302921320010 None Paved area for Lake Elmo Inn 1302921240003 11179 Stillwater Blvd N Lake Elmo Repair Shop Building 1302921230064 None Small strip of land west of 11799 Stillwater Blvd N 1302921230062 None Small strip of land east of and owned by same owner as 11179 Stillwater Blvd N 1302921320009 None Small strip of land north of 33rd St N 1302921320022 3504 Lake Elmo Ave N Owned by Lake Elmo Inn Page 7 Planning C0171111iSSi011 Meeting 1302921320008 1302921230020 March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #4a None Small strip of land north of 33rd St N None Small strip of land used for parking, owned by Christ Lutheran Church 1302921320096 11123 Upper 33d St N Owned by Grain on Main LLC 1 02921230063 None Parking area for 11179 Stillwater Blvd N 1302921230018 None Parcel south of parking area for 111 79 Stillwater Blvd N 1302921240028 None Schiltgen Property (31.78 acre parcel) 1302921320086 None Small strip of land north of 33 St N 1302921320085 None Small piece of land west of and owned by same owner as 11123 Upper 33'd St N 1302921320094 11320 Upper 33rd St N Storage building with parking (parking shared with Lake Elmo Inn) The Commission should consider if the above -mentioned parcels should also be rezoned to VMX. If the Commission recommends this, an additional public hearing notice would need to be published, and it is recommended this item be tabled until the next meeting after which an appropriate public hearing notice has been given for this Zoning Map Amendment to rezone these parcels. FISCAL IMPACT: Rezoning the subject area to Village Mixed Use zoning will allow property owners to redevelop or make improvements to their property in accordance with VMX standards, thereby allowing greater flexibility. Not having to go through the process or pay the application fee for a Zoning Map Amendment may further incent a property owner within the current GB district to make improvements that otherwise may not be allowed under the GB district standards. OPTIONS: The Planning Commission may recommend any of the following: 1) Rezone all of the parcels located in the GB — General Business District to VMX — Village Mixed Use and omit references to the GB district from the City Code, Page 8 Planning C0171111i.S'Si011 Meeting March 27, 2017 Public Hearing Item #4a 2) Rezone some of the parcels located in the GB — General Business District to VMX — Village Mixed Use and not omit references to the GB district from the City Code. 3) Table discussion so that an additional public hearing notice may be published to include the above -mentioned parcels in the Zoning Map Amendment rezoning propel -ties to VMX — Village Mixed Use. 4) Table discussion so that an additional public hearing notice may be published to include all properties guided for VMX — Village Mixed Use in the Zoning Map Amendment rezoning properties to VMX — Village Mixed Use. 5) Not rezone any parcels to VMX — Village Mixed Use at this time and leave references to the GB district from the City Code for the tine being. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recotrunends that the Planning Commission table tonight's discussion so that an additional public hearing notice may be published to include the above-mcntioned parcels in the Zoning Map Amendment rezoning properties to VMX — Village Mixed Use. "Move to table this Zoning Map Amendment Discussion to rezone properties to I/MX — Village Mixed Use until an appropriate public hearing notice may be published to include the above -mentioned properties in the Zoning Map Amendment." ATTACHMENTS: • GB District Regulations • VMX District Regulations • Ord. 08- rezoning GB parcels to VMX and omitting references to GB district from City Code. • Current and Proposed Zoning Maps • PC Meeting Minutes from 6.13.2016. Page 9 Maximum Width of Primary Dwelling Footings the first drainfield is prohibited. All dwelling units must be at least 20 feet wide through the main living area of the structure. The primary structure must have continuous frost footings. Continuous frost footings are not required for porches. decks, and other appendages so long as proper post type footings per existing Building Codes are constructed. Maximum Impervious Surface Coverage Maximum. Width of See § 93.26 Driveways Signage See §§ 154.212 (1997 Code, § 300.07 Subd. 4.D) (Am. Ord. 97-192, passed 6-19-2007) § 154.034 GB —GENERAL BUSINESS. A. Permitted uses and structures. 1. The followingervice/office uses: General Business — Service/Office Accounting Advertising (Sign fabrication not permitted use) Alterations Apparel Cleaninv, Pick-up Stations Apparel Repair and Alterations Architectural Art Gallery Auditing Bakeries (With production of bakery goods limited to retail sales) Barber Services Beauty Shops Bookkeeping Business and Management Consultant Offices 111-3 Business Associations Cafes and Restaurants - Drive -up window Cafes and Restaurants Charitable Chiropractic Civic, Social and Fraternal Association Offices and Halls Collection and Adjustment Services General Business— Service/Office Credit Reporting (Consumer and Mercantile) Dental Detective and Protective Agencies Duplication Educational Employment Agencies Engineering Finance Galleries Governmental Offices Insurance Investment Labor Unions Legal Libraries Mailing, .Medical Medical Services (Menu boards and intercom systems prohibited; Adequate vehicle stacking must be - provided) (Limited to full table service operations) (The compounding, dispensing or retail sale of drugs, prescription items, patient or proprietary medicine. sick room supplies, prosthetic devices or items relating to any of the foregoing when conducted in the building occupied primarily by medical, dental, osteopathic, chiropractic or III-4 Optometric Osteopathic Photo Gallery Professional Membership Organizations Real Estate Religious Scientific Research Shoe Repair General Business — Service/Office Stenographic Service Therapeutic Massage Welfare Offices optometric offices) (Excluding laboratory facilities) (See licensing requirements in § 114.01) (Am. Ord. 97-170, passed 5-2-2006; Am. Ord. 2012-064, passed 12-4-2012) 2. The following retail uses: General Business - Retail Antiques and Secondhand Merchandise Apparel and Related Accessories Automobile Repair and Services Automobiles and Automobile Accessories Bicycles Books Building Supplies Cameras and Photographic Supplies Cigars and Cigarettes Drugs and Proprietary Items Electrical Supplies Rowers and Floral Accessories Food and Grocery Products Furniture III-5 Gifts. Novelties and Souvenirs Glass Heating Equipment Home Furnishings and Related Equipment Jewelry Liquors Marine Craft and Accessories Newspapers and Magazines Nursery and Garden Supplies General Business — Retail Optical Goods Paint Pets Plumbing, Equipment Sporting Goods Stationery Wallpaper 3. The following repair/service uses: General Business — Repair/Serpiee Clock Repair Electrical Repair and Supplies Equipment —Rental and Leasing Food Catering Furniture Repair Heating Household Appliances Jewelry Repair Landscaping Radio 111-6 Reupholstery Television Watch Repair 4. The following office uses (excluding equipment storage General Business - Office Air Conditioning Contractor Building Construction Contractor Carpentry- Contractor General Business - Office Decorating Contractor Heating Contractor Masonry Contractor Painting Contractor Plastering Contractor Plumbing Contractor Roofing Contractor Sheet Metal Contractor Stone Work Contractor Tile Setting Contractor Wallpaper Contractor 'Water Well Drilling Contractor Wood Flooring Contractor 5. Uses permitted by conditional use permit. General Business - Conditional Use Bed and Breakfast Facility 15 Beds Maximum Boarding Care Facility 15 Residents Maximum Day Care Centers 40 Children Maximum Family Entertainment Centers Fitness Studio Maximum floor area not to exceed 5.000 square feet ill-7 Kennels Nursing Care Facility 15 Residents Maximum Open Sales Lots Manufacturing Any industrial manufacturing operation in existence within the city at the effective date of this chapter, including manufacture of wood products and plastic products, may continue the use as a conforming use without a conditional use pertnit. Nothing in this provision shall. otherwise be construed to require the city to authorize any manufacturing use in the General Business Zone after the effective date of this chapter. General Business - Conditional Use Veterinary Clinics (Am. Ord. 97-20, passed 10-21-1997; Am. Ord. 97-86, passed 10-2-2001; Am. Ord, 97-88, passed 10-2-2001; Am. Ord. 97-138, passed 9-7-2004; Am. Ord. 2012-064, passed 12-4-2012) 6. General requirements. a. All storage, services, repair or processing shall be conducted wholly within an enclosed building or behind opaque fence or wall not less than 6 feet high, except the outdoor display of merchandise; b. Incineration of waste matter shall be conducted in approved equipment located within the building wherein the permitted use is conducted; c. Where a proposed GB development abuts on RR, R-1, R-2, R-3. R-4, or RE district other than at a public street line, buffer provision shall be established. There shall be provided a protective strip of not less than 35 feet in N,vidth. The protective strip shall not be used for parking, off- street loading or storage and shall he landscaped. The protective strip must be approved by the Council as being in harmony with the residential neighborhood and providing sufficient screening of the commercial area; d. All lots must have at least 1 acre of land suitable for septic drainfields and area sufficient for 2 separate and distinct draintield sites, Placement of the second required draintield between the trenches of the first draintield is prohibited; and e. Must meet all requiretnents of §, 5.1.002 through 51.008. B. Accessory uses, Uses which are clearly incidental and subordinate to the allowed uses. (Am. Ord. 97-38, passed 11-17-1998) C. Minimum district requirements. III-8 The Old Village District shall be defined as the Old Village Sign District described in § 151.117(S)(1)(a), General Business Lot Size 1-1/2 acres except as required by 'Interstate Corridor Overlay District, § 150.230 - 150.238) Lot Width 150 Feet Minimum Building Setback from property lines: (Also see § 154.082) Front: 10 Feet Minimum No setback required for properties located in the Old Village District and south of Minnesota State Highway 5 Side (Interior): 20 Feet Minimum Side (Corner): Rear: Building Height (Also see § 154.083) Maximum area to be covered by buildings, parking lots, driveways and other hard surfaces: Up to 4 acres 40% of lot size Larger than 4 acres to 8 35% of lot size acres Larger than 8 acres 25% of lot size Lot Configuration Maximum lot depth to width dimension ratio shall be no more 3:1 Lot Size Lot Configuration Maximum Width of Driveways Signage No setback required for properties located in the Old Village District and south of Minnesota State Highway 5 50 Feet Minimum 50 Feet Minimum 35 Feet Maximum Covered Area Sec § 93.26 See §§ 154.212 Septic Drainage Regulation All newly subdivided lots shall have a minimum of 20,000 square (Also see §§ 51.002 feet of land dedicated for septic system use and suitable for that through 51.008) use. This land may comprise up to 2 separate areas, each of which III-9 is contiguous to the 1.25-acre building site or contained within it, and each of which contains at least 10,000 contiguous square feet. Placement of the second required clrainfield between the trenches of the first drainfield is prohibited. (1997 Code, § 300.07 Subc1. 4.H) (Am. Ord. -030, passed 10-5-20)0) D. Performance standards. I. Purpose and intent. a. It is the purpose and intent of the city, by the adoption of the performance standards of this division, to ensure commercial buildings constructed within the city are of a high quality of exterior appearance, consistent with the terms of Non -Residential Development Policy #5 of the 2000-2020 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. It is the finding of the city that a limited selection of primary exterior surfacing materials meets this standard of quality. b. It is the further finding of the city that several specific exterior surfacing materials are appropriate, and of sufficient quality, to be utilized only as accent materials in varying percentages. The variations of percentage of specific accent materials relates to a finding by the city as to the relative quality and rural character of those respective accent materials. Architectural and site plan submittals. New building proposals shall include architectural and site plans prepared by registered architect and shall show the following as a minimum: a. b. c. d. e. Elevations of all sides of the buildings; Type and color of exterior building materials; Typical general floor plans: Dimensions of all structures: and Location of trash containers, heating, cooling and ventilation equipment and systems, 3. Applicability — structure additions and renovation. a. Additions to existing structures resulting in an increase of gross floor area of the structure of loss than 100%; and/or installation of replacement exterior surfacing of any portion of an existing structure shall be exempt from the standards of this division where it is found that the new or replacement exterior surfacing proposed is identical to that of the existing structure. b. Where additions to an existing structure result in an increase in the gross floor area of the existing structure of 100% or greater, the entire structure (existing_ structure and structure addition) shall he subject to the standards of this division. 111-10 4. Performance standards — primary exterior surfacing. a. The primary exterior surfacing of structures shall be limited to natural brick, stone, or glass. Artificial or thin veneer brick or stone less than nominal 4 inches thick shall not qualify as complying with this perforinance standard. b. Primary exterior surface shall be defined as not less than 70% of the sum of the area of all exterior walls of a structure nominally perpendicular to the ground. All parapet or mansard surfaces extending above the ceiling height of the structure shall be considered exterior surface for the purposes of this division. Windows and glass doors shall be considered a primary surface, but the sum area of this glass shall be deducted from the wall area for purposes of the 70% primary/30% accent formulas of this chapter. Doors of any type of material, except glass, shall not be considered a primary exterior surface. c. Each wall of the structure shall be calculated separately and, individually comply with the 70/30 formula. 5. Perfon-nance standard — exterior surfacing accents. Not more than 30% of the exterior wall surfacing, as defined by division (D)(4) above, may be of the following listed accent materials, but no single accent material, except natural wood, may comprise more than 20% of the total of all accent materials; and, no combustible materials shall be used: a. Cedar, redwood, wood siding; b. Cement fiber board; c. Standing seam metal; d. Architectural metal; e. Stucco; f. Poured in place concrete (excluding "tilt -up" panels); g. Architectural metal panels: and (Am. Ord. 97-175, passed 6-20-2006) h. Porcelain or ceramic tile. 6. Pell brinance Standard — Acccssori' Structures. All accessory structures shall comply with the exterior surfacing requirements specified by this division (D). 7. Peg 677///tirce Standard —1-11/AC Units and Exterior rlpputlenances. All exterior equipment, HVAC and trash/recycling and dock areas shall be screened from view of the public with the primary exterior materials used on the principal structure. PerfOrmattec Standard — Roofing Materials. Any roofing materials that are visible from ground level shall be standing seam metal, fire -treated cedar shakes, ceramic tile, clay tile. concrete or slate. 9. Applicahilitr — NeuCo/is/maim!. The standards of this division shall he applicable to all structures and buildings constructed in the city, on and after the ARTICLE XIII. VILLAGE MIXED USE DISTRICT § 154.500 PURPOSE AND DISTRICT DESCRIPTION. The purpose of the VMX district is to provide an area for compact, mixed use development made mutually compatible through a combination of careful planning and urban design and coordinated public and private investment. This district is intended to continue the traditional mixed use development that has occurred in the Village area by allowing retail, service, office, civic and public uses as well as residential units. The mixture of land uses within the district is essential to establishing the level of the level of vitality and intensity needed to support retail and service uses. The placement of building edges and treatment of building. parking, landscaping, and pedestrian spaces is essential to creating the pedestrian friendly environment envisioned for the VMX district. The standards in this chapter are intended to implement and effectuate the principles and relationships established in the Village Master Plan, which will be carried out through specific standards related to site planning, signage, architecture, building materials, and landscaping. Renovation and infill of traditional storefront -type buildings is encouraged, and parking standards may be waived to recognize the availability of on -street and shared parking facilities. (Ord. 08-091, passed 11 -13- §154.501 PERMITTED AND CONDITIONAL USES. Table 11 -1 lists all permitted and conditional uses allowed in the urban residential districts. "P'. indicates a permitted use, "C" a conditional use. Uses not so indicated shall be considered prohibited. Cross-references listed in the table under "Standards" indicate the location within this Ordinance of specific development standards that apply to the listed use. A. Combinations (?)`' Uses. The following use types may be combined on a single parcel: 1. Principal and accessory uses may he combined on a single pared, A principal and secondary dwelling unit may be combined according to the standards of Section 154.454 (A) and 154.505 (D). 3. Single-family attached or multi -family complexes designed for rental or condominium occupancy, since these typically include multiple units and buildings on a single parcel. 4. Other permitted or conditional uses allowed within the district may be combined on a single parcel. provided that a unified and integrated site plan is approved. The entire development must be approved as a conditional use. 5. A mixed -use building that combines permitted or conditionally permitted residential, service, retail and civic uses :may be developed meeting the form standards of this Article. Office or studio uses on upper stories are encouraged. XIII-1 Table 11-1: Permitted and Conditional Uses, VMX Districts VN1X Standard Residential Uscs Household Living Single-family detached &vanng Two-family dwelling Single-family attached dwelling Multifamily dwelling Secondary dwelling Live -work unit Group Living Group Horne Group Residential Facility Cong-regate Housing Semi -Transient Accommodations Public and Civic Uses 13* c c c * Sec Restrictions in 155.504 (A) * See Restrictions in 155.504 (A) 154.505 (B) 154.505 (C) 154.505 (D), 154.454 (C) 154.505 (.1) 154.012 (B) (1) (b). 154.301 (A) 154.012 (B) (1) (b), 154.301 (B) 154.012 (B) (1) (b), 154.301 (C) 154.012 (B) (1) (b), 154.301 (D) Community Services Day Care Center Public Assembly Religious Institutions Schools, Public and Private Services Business Services Business Center Offices Communications Services Education Services Financial Institution Funeral Home Lodging Medical Facility Membership Organization Nursing and Personal Care Personal Services Repair and Maintenance Shop Trade Shop YOetinar,v 5ervi,Ps. Food ScrOCCS Standard Restaurant Restaurant with Drive -through Drinking, and Entertainment Saks of Merchandise P P c P P P P P P c c c P c c XIII-2 154.012 (B) (2) 154.012 (B) (2) 154.012 (B) (2) 154.012 (B) (2), 154.303 (N) 154.012 (B) (2), 154.303 (A) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.303 (A) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.302 (D) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.303 (B) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.303 (C) 154.012 (B) (3) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.505 (E) 154.012 (B) (3), 154.505 (F) 1,54,01,2 (13) (31, 1.54.505 Standard 154.012 (B) (4), 154.505 (L) 154.012 (B) (4), 154,505 (L), 154.304 (A) 154.012 (B) (4), 154.505 (L). 154.304 (B) Retail Trade Farmer's Market Garden Center Neighborhood Convenience Store Shopping Center Wayside Stand Automotive/Vehicular 1:Tses Automobile Maintenance Service Automobile Pans/Supply Gasoline Station Parkins!, Facility Sales and Storage Lots Outdoor Recreation P c c I C Ip c c Outdoor Recreation Facility Parks and Open Areas indoor Recreation/Entertainment Indoor Athletic Facility Indoor Recreation Transportation and Communications 154.01.2 (B) (5) 154.012 (B) (5), 154.505 1-1) H 154.012 (B) (5) 154.012 (B) (5) 154.505 (I) 154.505 (I) 154.305 (B) 154.505 (K) 154.305 (C) 154.306 (C) 154.012 (B) (7) Broadcasting or Communications Facility 1 C hccessory Uses Horne Occupation Bed and Breakfast A Domestic Pets Family Day Care Group Family Day Care Temporary Sales Parking Facility Solar Equipment Swimming Pools, Hot Tubs, Etc. Other Structures Typically Incidental and Clearly Subordinate to Permitted Uses Note: Standards listed in Table 11-1 are listed by Article, Section and Subsection. 1, Retail Trade in the VMX District includes all uses and activities defined as Retail Trade in §154.012 (B) (5) with the exception of building supplies sales and warehouse club sales. 154.012 (B) (7), 154.307 (A) 154.012 (B) (7), 154.307 (A) 154.012 (B) (11), 154.083 P 154.012 (B) ( 2) C 154.012 (B) (12) P 154.012 (B) (12) P 154.012 t131 (12) C 154.012 (B) (12) P 154,012 (B) (12) P 154.505 (K) P 154.012 (B) (12), 154,310 (C) P 154.012 (B) (12) (Ord. 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) § 154.502 LOT DIMENSIONS AND BUILDING BULK REQUIREMENTS. Lot area and setback requirements shall be as specified in Table 11-2, Lot Dimension and Setback Requirements. Xli1-3 Table 11-2: Lot Dimension and Setback Requirements, VMX District Area (sq. ft.) Non -Residential Use Single Family Detached Dwelling Two -Family Dwelling (per unit) Single -Family Attached (per unit) Multi -Family Dwelling (per unit) Secondary Dwelling Live -Work Unit Congregate Housing Other Structures Maximum Lot Area (acres) Residential Structures Other Structures Minimum Lot Width (feet) Single Family Detached Dwelling Two -Family Dwelling (per unit) Single -Family Attached (per unit)' Multi -Family Dwelling (per building) Live -Work Unit Maximum Height (feet/stories) None 5,000 3,000 2,500 1,800 See 154.454(C) 3,000 See 154_301 (C) 3,500 N/A 5 50 30 25 75 25 35/3 VIVIX Maximum Impervious Coverage Residential Structures 75"/o Other Structures No Limit Minimum Building Setbacks (feet) Front Yard See 154,506 Interior Side Yard 10 Corner Side Yard g 0 Rear Yard 10 Notes to VMX District Table a, No development may exceed the residential density range as specified in the Comprehensive Plan for the Village Mixed Use land use category XIII-4 b. Two-family units may he side -by -side with a party wall between them ("twin") or located on separate floors in a building on a single lot ("duplex"). The per -unit measurements in this table apply to "twin" units, whether on a single lot or separate lots. The standards for single-family detached dwelling shall apply to a "duplex" containing two vertically - separated units on a single lot. c. In the case of single-family attached dwellings that are not situated on individual lots, minimum lot size shall be applied to each unit as a measure of density; i.e. I unit per 2,500 square feet. This standard is also used for multifamily dwellings. d. Buildings up to 45 feet in height may be permitted as part of a PUD. e. The front yard setback for single family homes shall be 25 feet. f. Side yard setbacks in the VMX District apply only along lot lines abutting residentially zoned parcels or those parcels with residential uses as the sole use. Corner properties: the side yard facade of a corner building adjoining a public street shall maintain the front setback of the adjacent property fronting upon the same public street, or the required front yard setback, whichever is less. If no structure exists on the adjacent property, the setback shall be shown in the table. (Ord. 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) g- § 154.503 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS AND PRESERVATION OF OPEN SPACE. A. Averaging of Lot Area. When lots are clustered within a development to provide common open space, the open space may be used to calculate an average density per lot to determine compliance with the individual lot are requirements. B. Lot Dimension Reductions. Other reductions in dimensional standards may be considered as part or a Planned Unit Development if these reductions provide for common open space within a development. (Ord. 0S-091, passed 11-13-2013) § 154.504 GENERAL SITE DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS — VMX DISTRICT. Development of land within the VMX District shall follow established standards for traffic cireulation, landscape design, and other considerations as specified in Article 7, 8 and 9. (Ord. 08-152, passed 10-01-2016) A. Circiticition. New access points to State Highway 5 may be refused or restricted to right - in right -out movement if alternatives exist. Internal connections shall be provided between parking areas on adjacent properties wherever feasible. 1. The number and width of curb -cuts shall be minimized. To promote pedestrian circulation. existing continuous curb -cuts shall be reduced to widths necessary for vehicular traffic, and unnecessary or abandoned curb cuts shall be removed as parcels are developed. XIII-5 B. Fencing and Screening. Feneing and sereening walls visible from the public right-of-way shall be constructed of materials compatible with the principle structure. C. Lighting Design. Lighting shall be integrated into the exterior design of new or renovated structures to create a greater sense of activity, security, and interest to the pedestrian. and shall comply with §150.035-150,038 Lighting, Glare Control, and Exterior Lighting Standards. D. Exterior Storage. Exterior materials storage must be screened from view from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential properties, by a wing of the principal structure or a screen wall constructed of the same materials as the principal structure. Height of the structure or screen wall must he sufficient to completely conceal the stored materials from view at eye level (measured at six feet above ground level) on the adjacent street or property. E. Screening of Existing Residential Structures. When a new development is proposed adjacent to an existing single family residential structure, screening shall be provided in accordance with §154.258,F. The City may require buffering or screening above and beyond this section in cases where the required screening will not provide an adequate separation between incompatible uses. (Ord. 08-091, passed 1 1-13-2013) § 154.505 DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC USES. Development of land within the VMX district shall follow established standards for traffic circulation, landscape design, parking, signs and other considerations as specified in Articles 7, 8 and 9. The following standards apply to specific uses; other standards related to design and building type may be found at §154.506. (Ord. 08-152, passed 10-01-2016) A. Single -Family and Two -Family Dwellings Single -Family Dwellings are limited to those existing at the time of adoption of this Ordinance. Existing single-family dwellings shall be considered permitted uses, rather than nonconformingnoncoiiforinjng uses. 2. Unless otherwise specified in this Article, Single and Two .Family Dwellings in the VMX district shall adhere to the MDR district setbacks as specified in §154.452. B. Single -Family Attached Dwellings 1. A maximum of eight (8) units shall be permitted within a single building. 2, Townhouse dwellings shall be located on lots in such a way that each individual unit has a minimum of twenty-five (25) feet of public street frontage. No parking shall he located in the front yard or between the front facade and the street. 3. The primary entrance to each unit shall be located on the facade fronting a public street; an additional entrance may be provided on the rear or side facade. XIII-6 4. Common open space for use by all residents or private open space adjacent to each unit shall be provided. Such open space shall compromise a minimum of three hundred (300) square feet per unit. C. Dwelling Units. Dwelling units (both condominium and rental) are restricted to the upper floors or rear or side ground floors of a mixed use building. I. No parking shall be located in the front yard or between the front facade and the street. D. Secondaty Dwellings. Restricted to lots occupied by single-family dwellings, and must meet the standards for secondary dwellings in residential districts, *154.454 (C). E. Repair and Maintenance Shop. No outdoor storage is permitted unless fully screened from public view. F. Trade Shop. Exterior materials storage must be totally screened from view from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential properties by a wall of the principal structure or a screen wall constructed of the same materials as the principal structure. G. Veterinaty Services. All activities must be conducted within an enclosed building. H. Garden Center, 1. The storage or display of any materials or products shall meet all setback requirements of a structure, and shall be maintained in an orderly manner. Screening along the boundaries of adjacent residential properties may be required, meeting the standards of Section 154.258 (F), 2. All loading and parking shall be provided off-street. 3. The storage of any soil, fertilizer or other loose, unpackaged materials shall be contained so as to prevent any effects on adjacent uses. 1. Automobile Maintenance Service and Automobile Parts/Supplv. 1. All vehicle repairs shall be conducted in a completely enclosed building 2. The storage or display of inoperable or unlicensed vehicles or other equipment shall meet all setback requirements of a structure, and shall be totally screened from view from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential properties. .1. Live -Work Unit. The purpose of a live -work unit is to provide a transitional use type between a home occupation and a larger commercial enterprise, and to provide neighborhood -oriented commercial services, while maintaining a generally residential character in which the work space is subordinate to the residential use. 1. The work space component shall be located on the first floor or basement of the building. 2 The dwelling unit component shall inaintain a separate entrance located on the front or side facade and accessible from the primary abutting public street. 3 The work space component of the unit shall not exceed thirty (30) percent of the total gross floor area of the unit. XIII-7 4. A total of two (2) off-street parking spaces shall be provided for a live -work unit, located to the rear of the unit, or underground/enclosed, 5. The size and nature of the work space shall be limited so that the building type may be governed by residential building. codes. An increase in size or intensity beyond the specified limit on floor area would require the building to be classified as a mixed -use building. 6. The business component of the building may include offices, small service establishments, home crafts which are typically considered accessory to a dwelling unit, or limited retailing (hy appointment only) associated with fine arts. crafts, or personal services. It may not include a wholesale business, a commercial food service requiring a license, a limousine business or auto service or repair for any vehicles other than those registered to residents of the property. 7. The business of the live -work unit must be conducted by a person who resides on the same lot. The business shall not employ more than two (2) workers on -site at any one time who live outside of the live -work unit. K. Parking Facility, Structured parking is permitted as a ground floor use within a mixed - use building, provided that it is located on side or rear facades, not facing the primary abutting street. The primary street -facing facade shall be designed for retail, office or residential use. The primary street facade may include an entrance into the parking facility. L. Outdoo; Diiiing Aceessoly to Food Services. Outdoor dining is allowed as an accessory use in the commercial districts, provided that tables do not block the sidewalk. A minimum of five (5) feet of sidewalk must remain open. (Ord 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) § 154.506 VMX DISTRICT DESIGN AND DEMOLITION REVIEW. A. Review al Design. For certain development activity as specified in the Lake Elmo Design Standards Manual, design review is required as part of the approval process for a permit or certificate under this Ordinance. All projects subject to design review shall be reviewed for conformance with the Lake Elmo Design Standards Manual. A separate process for design review is not established. I. Review Authority (11141 PrOCCSS. Design review shall be the responsibility of the individual or body authorizing the permit or certificate and shall be incorporated in the established review of the applicable permit or certificate. For those applications under this Ordinance that require review by the Planning, Commission, the Plaruiing Commission shali consider the standards in the Lake Elmo Design Standards Manual as part of its recommendation to the City Council, Revicw f-i• Pre essional. The authorizing body may request review by a design professional of the proposed design or demolition, The cost of review by such design professional shall be charged by the applicant, and shall not exceed $1,000 unless otherwise agreed to by the applicant. XIII-8 3 aye/op/nen/ Activity Dcfincd, Development Activity consists of new construction and redevelopment activities, including remodeling that expands the footprint of a structure, altering, or repairing a structure in a manner that will change the exterior appearance of said structure. Development activity also includes the construction of a new parking lots and installation of signage. a. Exempt Jctivities. The following activities shall be exempt from under review of this Section: i. Ordinary repairs and maintenance that will not change the exterior appearance of a structure; ii. Removal of existing signage without replacement unless said signs are an integral part of the building; iii. Emergency repairs ordered by the Director of Planning in order to protect public health and safety; iv. Exterior alteration, addition, or repair of a structure used as a single- family residence, duplex, or two-family residence. v. Temporary signage, installed in accordance with §154.212 of this Ordnance, or during which time an application for permanent signage is pending under this Ordinance; vi. Maintenance of existing signage advertising an on -site business; vii. Alterations only to the interior of a structure. (Ord 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) § 154.507 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. .Accessory uses are listed in the VMX District Use Table as permitted or conditional accessory uses. Accessory uses and structures in the VMX District shall comply with the following standards and all other applicable regulations of this ordinance: A. Phasing. No accessory use or structure shall be constructed or established on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal use to which it is accessory. B. inch/ciao/ to Principal Us-e. The accessory use or structure shall be incidental to and customarily associated with the principal use or structure served. C. Subordinate to Principal U5c. The accessory use or structure shall be subordinate in the area, extent, and purpose to the principal use or structure served. D. Function, The accessory use or structure shall contribute to the comtlirt, convenience, or necessity of the occupants of the principal use or structure served. E. Location, The accessory use or structure shall be located on the same zoning lot as the principal use or structure. (Ord 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) XIII-9 §154.508 RESIDENTIAL ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, VILLAGE MIXED -USE DISTRICT. A. Attached Structures, Village Mixed -Use District, An accessory structure shall be considered attached, and an integral part of, the principal structure when it is connected by an enclosed passageway. All attached accessory structures shall be subject to the following requirements: I. The structure shall meet the required yard setbacks for a principal structure, as established for the zoning district in which it is located. 2. The structure shall not exceed the height f the principal building to which it is attached. B. ,-Itruchecl Garages, Mived-Use District 1. Attached garages are encouraged to be side or rear loaded. If facing the primary street, garages shall be designed using one of the following techniques, unless specific physical conditions on the lot in question require a different approach: a. The front of the garage is recessed at least- four (4) feet behind the plane of the primary facade; or b. The front of the garage is recessed at least four (4) feet behind a porch if the garage is even with the primary facade. The width of the attached garage shall not exceed 409/0 of the width of the entire principal building facade (including garage) fronting the primary street. 3. Attached garages shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet in area at the ground floor level except by conditional use permit. 4. Garage doors or openings shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height. C. Detached Structures, Village Mixed -Use District. Detached accessory structures that are accessory to permitted residential structures in the VMX District shall adhere to the following requirements: 1. Detached accessory structures shall be located to the side or rear of the principal building. and are not permitted within the required front yard or within a side yard abutting a street. Detached garages shall not exceed one thousand (1,000) square feet at ground floor level and shall not exceed a height of twenty-two (22) feet or the height of the principal structure. The maximum size and height may be increased upon approval of a conditional use permit, provided that lot coverage requirements are satisfied. 7 3. Pole barns, as defined herein, shall be prohibited. 4. No more than thirty (30) percent of the rear yard area may be covered by accessory structures. 5. Garage doors or openings shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height. XIII-10 D. Exterior Design and Color, All ACCCSSOly Structures. The exterior building materials, design and color of all accessory building or structures shall be similar to or compatible with the principal building. with the exception of the following accessory building or structures: 1. Gazebos 2. Swimming pools 3. Tennis and sport courts 4. Other structures in which the required design is integral to the intended use. such as a greenhouse. (Ord. 08-104, passed 3-18-2014) Penalty, see § 154,999 § 154.509 ACCESSORY USES. A. Exterior Storage on Residential Parcels. All materials and equipment shall be stored within a building or be fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties. except for the following: 1. Laundry drying 2 Construction and landscaping materials and equipment currently being used on the premises. Materials kept on the premises for a period exceeding six (6) months shall be screened or stored out of view of the primary street on which the house fronts. 3. Agricultural equipment and materials, if these are used or intended for use on the premises. 4. Off-street parking and storage of vehicles and accessory equipment. as regulated in Sections 154.404 and 154.210. 5. Storage of firewood shall be kept at least ten (10) feet from any habitable structure and screened from view oladjacent properties. 6. Outdoor parking B. Tempo/y:1T Sales. Temporary sales, also known as yard or garage sales, are permitted in all residential districts, limited to two (2) per calendar year per residence, not to exceed tour (4) days in length for each event, (Ord 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) § 154.510 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES NOT LISTED. Standards for accessory uses and structures that are permitted in all districts, or in all residential buildings in any district, are listed in Article 9. Specific Development Standards. These include uses such as family and group family day care, bed and breakfast facilities, and home occupations, and structures such as swimming pools and solar equipment. (Ord 08-091, passed 11-13-2013) (Ord. 08-152. passed 10-01-2016) XIII-11 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08- AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO AND AMENDING THE ZONING CODE BY OMITTING SECTION 034: GB - GENERAL BUSINESS SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby ordains the following properties to be rezoned from GB - General Business to VMX - Village Mixed Use: PIDs: 1302921230055 1302921320001 1302921320052 1302921210010 1302921120013 1302921230057 1302921230038 1302921320026 1302921320012 1302921120010 1302921230058 1302921230037 1302921230007 1302921240022 1302921120016 1302921320021 1302921320019 1302921320046 1302921220007 1302921120012 1302921230068 1302921210013 1302921230059 1302921220023 1302921120009 1302921320025 1302921210014 1302921310017 1302921220018 1302921120011 1302921230070 1302921210011 1302921210016 1302921220016 1302921120015 1302921320049 1302921210012 1302921310016 1302921220017 1302921120014 1302921320051 1302921210015 1302921230046 1302921220019 1302921220008 1302921320048 1302921320041 1302921230065 1302921220022 1302921220010 1302921320047 1302921320042 1302921230053 1302921220021 1302921240016 1302921240020 1302921320083 1302921240024 1302921220020 1302921220012 1302921310003 1302921230054 1302921240019 1302921240021 1302921230071 1302921230056 1302921210001 1302921240017 1302921210006 1302921210007 1302921320032 1302921320005 1302921230067 1302921220002 1302921220013 1302921320027 1302921230025 1302921240025 1302921220011 1302921220014 1302921210009 1302921230004 1302921210002 SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo also hereby ordains that the Zoning Administrator shall make the applicable changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby strikes Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; by repealing Section 154.034: GB - General Business in its entirety. SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby strikes reference to 154.034: GB - General Business District from the Table of Contents of Chapter 154: Zoning Code of Title XV: Land Usage. 1 SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 030: Classifications by eliminating the following: § 154.030 CLASSIFICATIONS. For the purpose of this chapter, all land in the city is divided into zoning districts. The zoning districts shall be identified by the following classifications, including those districts identified in § 154.350: (A) R-2 One- and Two -Family Residential OP Open Space Preservation District OZD Overlay Zoning Use District SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 212: Sign Regulations; Table 5-3 to read the following: Ground Signs Zoning Districts Aa, LDR, OP, RE, RS, RRa, RTa No. of Speed Max Height/ Total Limit Area (Sq. Ft.) Traffic (MPH) Lanes 1-3 0-34 4-5 35-44 45+ 0-34 35-44 45+ MDR, HDR BP, C, CC, LC, VMX Max Height/ Max Height/ A Area (Sq. Ft.)rea (Sq. Ft.) 6'/32 10'/32 6'/32 6/32 6'/32 6'/32 6'/32 10'/50 10'/72 10' /40 10'/64 12'/80 SECTION 7. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 150.116: [Wireless Communications] Zoning Requirements to read the following: 2 1 150.116 ZONING REQUIREMENTS. (A) Wireless conununications facilities that require a conditional use permit, including the installation of a new tower, shall be permitted in the following districts and subject to the following height restrictions provided they meet all other requirements of this subchapter. Zoning District A- Agriculture RR - Rural Residential Zoning Rosidential OP - Open Space RE - Residential Estates LB, CB, - Business BP - Business Park PF - Public Facility Maximum Height (in feet) Minimilin Parcel Area 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 125 SECTION 8. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 153.14: Park Land Dedication Requirements to read the following: 10 5 2.5 2.5 2,5 5 5 None Zoning Districts Minhnum Required Land Dedication C, CC, LC, VMX, RR and AG with OP Conditional Use Permit RR and AG with OP -A Conditional Use Permit Fee as set by Council resolution 7/0 10% SECTION 9. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 10. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08- was adopted on this day of , 2016, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL 3 Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Julie Johnson, City Clerk This Ordinance 08- was published on the day of 2017. Lake Elmo Zoning Map A 1&. El:Mt re_ Current Zoning Lake Elmo Zoning Map .e.—eete " W,1 Proposed Zoning (Only includes parcels included in the Public Hearing Notice — see next page for parcels added in Staff report) Proposed Zoning (includes parcels that were included in tonight's Staff report but were not advertised in public hearing) _54-t-J0 38 The aqua -outlined VMX-zoned parcels are those that were added in the Staff Report that were not zoned GB 5 Public hearing opened otD:34pnn Noone spoke and there was nowritten comments received. Public hearing closed at8:35prn Dunn would like tOsee the option ofsewer nrprivate septic. She doesn't think that they should beforced toconnect tosewer. VVensnnanstated that the comprehensive Plan is not in compliance with the projects that we are doing. if we don't do this amendment, the land use designation would need tobechanged. M/S/P:Fie|ds/Dodsnn,Move torecommend the City Council approve the comprehensive plan text amendment to amend the planned land use category in the Comprehensive Land Use Plan toread aswritten, Vote: 5'1,motion carried. Dunn voted nobecause shafee/s/tis important that people have onoption regarding connect/on' Business Item — Zoning Text Amendment to discuss the VMX Zoning Text. Wensman began his presentation by showing the areas that are zoned as general business, but guided asVK8Xinthe Comprehensive Plan. To bring the zoning into compliance with the Comprehensive Plan, Wensman would like to see these properties rezoned. VVensnnanbelieves byrezoning, itwould actually eliminate some non conformities. The area that would change the most, would beinthe Northern area hy 39m Street. VVennnoan stated that this was intended to bring the district more in conformance than it is now and should be done as a district vs. one at a time. if there are things about the district that the Commission does not like, then changes should he made tothe district. Dunn feels that the premise is based on the Village Master Plan, Where is the master plan? Wensman stated that the plan was based on transfer of density and he is not sure what happened tothat plan. Dunn did arough calculation onwhat could bedone ifthe nnaxjnnunn densities were used. With her calculation, there is potential for upwards of 3000peop|e. She feels itisquite intense and not appropriate for this target area. She would like to see more work done on the reductions for the comprehensive plan and possibly look atform based code. Dunn would like tosee the Comprehensive Plan revisited assoon aspossible for population reductions. She thinks vveshould take our time and dothis right. Dunn pointed out some ofthe differences between G8and VMX. She feels one ofthe biggest differences is the impervious surface coverage maximum goes from 40% based onacreage inGBto7596inVK4X. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-13-1.6 6 Fields is confused because if the comprehensive plan is guided the way we want it, the rezoning should happen. |fm/eare considering ifthe guiding iscorrect, then itshould not herezoned, but should bediscussed what the guiding should be. Larson thinks that what brings the guiding for VMX into question is that the density of this area isintransition. La/son understands the feeling of discomfort asthis zone is less restrictive. There are still alot o[questions that make ituncomfortable for people tobuy into this zone. Williams thinks itwould begood tnask the City Council ifpast projections ofpopu|ation in this area are still valid. Dodson iswondering how big aproject form based code is. VVensrnanstated that itis something that takes some technical skill to do and it would need to be contracted out. Williams thinks it would help facilitate the vision, but would not be necessary to do the rezone. K4/:Dunn/Move torecommend not rezoning the parcels tnVMXuntil the City Council can review the target numbers and there is a form based code, motion dies for lack of second' M/5/P: Williams/Dunn, Move to ask the City Council togive the Planning Commission guidance onupdated population and development projections fortheareas guided for VMXinthe Old Village, Vote/6-0, motion carried unanimously. Fields would like toknow what the driving force was for the VK4X. |fhwas tobring more people to the downtown to make it more vibrant, or if it was to meet the Met Council mandates for housing population. Williams recollection was that itwas for both of those reasons in addition to form based code to make it a more picturesque downtown and to incorporate business and residential in the same building, which general business does not do. M/S/P: Williams/Dodson, Move to ask the City Council to approve funds for a consultant towork onaform based code for the downtown Old Village, Vote: G'C\motion carried Fields would like any information that he could get nnform based code. Williams believes that the City has coup|e ofvideos on this topic. Staff Updates 1. Upcoming Meetings a. June Z7,ZOlG h� July 11,2016 Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-13-1.6 7 Commission Concerns Dunn asked about the AUAR. VVensnoanstated that the City isoverdue for the update and it is in the City Engineers hands right now. Meeting adjourned at9:28pno Respectfully submitted, ]oanZiertnnan Planning Program Assistant Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-13-16 City ofLake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes ofApril 24`2Q17 Chairman Kreimer called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Dorschncr, Fields, Larson' Kneinner, Dodson, Emerson, Williams, Lundquist and Hartley COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director VVensnoanand City Planner Becker Approve Agenda: Accept the agenda as presented. Approve Minutes: April 10, 2017 K4/S/p: Williams/Dodson, move toapprove the April 10, 2017 minutes as presented, Vote: 7-0, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing — Zoning Map Amendment — Rezone Properties to VMX Becker started her presentation by reviewing what was discussed at the March 27, 2017 meeting, After advertising the public hearing notice for that meeting, staff learned that there were a number of Zoning Map errors with incorrect zoning classifications resulting in properties that should have been included in the public notification for rezoning. There are 2properties that are zoned GB, that are guided for RAD. Staff does not recommend rezoning these at this time, The guidance ofthe properties should first be reconsidered with the 2U4OComp Plan update process. Asaresult, GBstandards will need tVremain inthe code. The 5chi|tgenparcel, which isalarger parcel, was added to the PH notice, however, staff is not recommending that it be rezoned at this time. It is typical for the developers to rezone during Preliminary Plat process. Dmrschnerasked why wvewould keep the general business standards. VVcnsnnanstated that 2parcels are zoned GB, but are guided for RAD. VVensrnanstated that until the guidance is changed, if they continue to remain GB, there needs to be standards. Dorschner stated that he thought this whole exercise was to get everything in line now because mfnew development coming in. VVensnnanstated that ifitisthe desire o[the Commission to get rid of the GB standards, those 2 properties could be rezoned to RAD. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4-24-17 Z These properties are currently not used for business, even though that is how they are zoned. Becker stated that the reason they are rezoning alot ofthese properties is because a lot of the properties do not meet the standards and are legal non -conforming, The rezone to VMX will give them better standards to work with for their properties and make them more conforming. The VMXstandards give them greater flexibility. Williams asked if they had heard anything from the property owners of the 2 parcels. He is wondering if they might have thought they were going to be rezoned to VMX. Becker stated that it is possible, but after reviewing the map, it was determined that they are guided for RAID. Williams asked about the impervious surface allowance in the table. Becker stated that the numbers intable are reversed. Williams asked |fthe list o[ properties indudedanyresidentia/propert/es. Becker stated that ifthey were not already zoned asGB, they were not included. There were acouple ofproperties that were zoned osresidential that are used for business, Those are being rezoned toVK8X. Public Hearing opened et7:14pnn Susan Dunn, I1O18Upper 3],dStreet, she bconcerned asshe lives inosingle family home inthe Village. Dunn iswondering ifall single family homes will bereguided10 VK4X. Becker stated that no, not all would bBrezoned. Only those currently zoned GU or used for commercial purposes and had a zoning map error and guided for VMX will be rezoned. Becker estimated that approximately 78acres would be rezoned. There are approximately 1300 acres in the Village, with approximately 164 acres guided for VMX. Dunn asked how many units per acre are inVK4X. Becker stated that there are 6' lOunitsperacna. Dunn isnot infavor ofthat large ofanarea being VMX. There were no written comments Public Hearing closed at7:I8pno Larson asked about the single family homes and how they would be handled. Becker stated that itdepends how the ZTAfor Village Urban Districts 1sdecided. She stated that right now, it states that single family homes are permitted. VVensnnan stated that the single family homes are not being rezoned atthis time, VVensnnanstated that the next step istodecide with the ZTAhow tohandle them, Should they berezoned, neguided,orleft that same. M/S/P: Williams/Lundquist, move to recommend a Zoning Map Amendment rezoning properties outlined in Ord. 08- to VMX —Village Mixed Use, Vote: 7-0, motion carried Public Hearing — Grading Permit in Excess of 400 cubic yards of material Becker started her presentation Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4-24-17 Public Hearing opened at:prn There were nowritten comments and noone spoke Public Hearing closed at :pnn M/S/P: / move to recommend, Vote: -, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing — Zoning Text Amendment — Solar Energy Becker started her presentation Public Hearing opened at:prn 0oone spoke and there were nowritten comments Public Hearing closed at:pnn W1/SJP: / move to, Vote: -, motion carried unanimously. Business |tern — Easton Village 2 Final Plat Becker started her presentation K4/S/p: / move torecommend approval : Vote: -, motion carried unanimously. Business Item — Zoning Text Amendment — Village Urban Districts Becker started her presentation M/S/P: /, move to, Vote: -, motion carried unanimously. City Council Updates —April 1Q,2O17Meeting i) Engineering & Landscape Design & Construction Standards —Passed ii) Bremer Bank Service Center Easement Vacations— Passed Staff Updates l. Upcoming Meetings a. May 8,ZO17 b. May Z2,ZOl7 Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4'24'17 4 2. MAC CEP Report Commission Concerns Meeting adjourned at:pnn Respectfully submitted, ]nanZiertnnan Planning Program Assistant Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 4-24-17 Current Zoning )UlJ 3664 z 650 3645 3646 3625 - 3631 3624 < Proposed Zoning W. CITY ( )1: LAKE ELMO STAFF REPORT DATE: 5/2/2017 REGULAR ITEM #: 11 MOTION TO: City Council FROM: Emily Becker, City Planner AGENDA ITEM: V-LDR/VMX Zoning Text Amendment REVIEWED BY: Stephen Wensman, Planning Director BACKGROUND: During the Planning Commission meeting on November 14, 2016, there was discussion regarding the need for a Village Urban Low Density (V-LDR) zoning district for areas guided for Village Urban Low Density on the Comprehensive Plan's Land Use Map, as no zoning districts currently allow the density designated for this Land Use (1.5-2.49 units per acre). Staff drafted an ordinance which created the V-LDR zoning district, setting forth standards. The zoning district was drafted to be included in Article Xlli — Village Mixed Use District of the Zoning Code. Staff and the Planning Commission also took the opportunity to make amendments to standards of the Village Mixed Use (VMX) zoning district. The Planning Commission reviewed the draft ordinance at its January 23, February 13, February 27, March 27, April 10 (public hearing), 2017 meetings, and made recommendation on the proposed ordinance amendment at its April 24, 2017 meeting. ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL:. The Council should review and consider adoption of an ordinance amendment to Article XIII — Village Mixed Use of the Zoning Code, creating a V-LDR zoning district and making amendments to the VMX zoning district. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS:, The following describes a summary of the V-LDR zoning district as well as amendments to the VMX zoning district standards. Because the ordinance amendment was discussed over a number of meetings, only the latest Planning Commission Staff Report, attachinents, and meeting minutes are included in the attachments to this report. V-LDR Zoning District. • Purpose and District Description is added, defining density as 1.5-2.49 units per acre. • Lot Dimensions and Setback Requirements. o The minimum lot size of the V-I.DR. zoning district is proposed as 9,000 square feet in size, as this is slightly increased from the minimum lot size of the Urban Low Density Residential zoning district (8,000 square feet) due to a slightly lower density. This is also City Council Meeting 5/2/2017 Regular Agenda item #11 the minimum lot size in the Golf Course Community zoning district. The minimum lot width (70 feet) is also slightly longer than and inaximum impervious surface (35%) is slightly less than the Urban Low Density zoning district (60 feet and 40%, respectively) due to larger lots. Accessory structure setbacks from the Urban Residential zoning districts were added, as well as the provision that garages may not exceed more than 60`)/0 of the entire principal facade. • Setbacks fi-om County Roads. 30 foot setbacks are proposed for residential homes within the V- LDR for reasons outlined in the April 24, 2017 Planning Commission Staff Report. • Village Open Space Overlay District, A provision was added to protect lots from encroaching the buffer areas within the Village Open Space Overlay District but also allowing an alternative to this requirement if berming or screening is provided and protected by landscape easement. • Sidewalks and/or Trails to Connect Cul-de-Sac Bulbs to roads or trails. • Lake Elmo Theming Study Elements to be incorporated where applicable. • Minimum House Size is added. This is a requirement that is within all residential zoning districts of the Zoning Code. MX Zoning District. • Density. Defines that development shall occur at a density of 6-10 units per acre and adds language from the Comprehensive Plan which allows density to increase to 16 units per acre for senior congregate care facilities with a conditional use permit. • Single-family detached and two-family dwellings are conditional uses. o Previous language indicated that existing single-fatnily detached and two-family dwellings are pennitted within the VMX. Upon rezoning, either a use needs to be permitted, conditional or interim, or it becomes legal non -conforming (and therefore subject to the City's Non -Conforming Uses and Structures Ordinance). Therefore, better language was needed to both recognize existing single-family detached and two-family homes within the VMX district as well as allow for additional single-family homes provided the use is compatible with the existing neighborhood. o Staff and the Planning Commission believe the best way to accomplish this is to make them a conditional use within the VMX. A conditional use pennit would require that the Planning Commission and City Council make the required findings for a conditional use pennit that the proposed single-family detached or two-family dwelling meet the provisions outlined in Section 154.106: Conditional Use Permits, attached to the attached Planning Commission Staff Report dated April 24, 2017. o This would result in existing single-family detached and two-family dwellings not needing a conditional use permit unless they were to expand. New single-family detached and two- family dwellings would require a conditional use permit. • Other Residential Uses are changed from permitted to conditional uses. o The Commission recommended that all other residential uses, including live -work units and group homes be conditional, rather than pennitted uses. The City Attorney was consulted regarding amending group homes to be conditional uses and has stated that group homes as defined by Minn. Statute are required to be permitted in cities. • .Automobile Parts/Supply are changed from permitted to conditional uses. o The Planning Commission recommended this, as all other Automotive/Vehicular Uses are conditional uses. • Setbacks. Setbacks standards are proposed to meet the prevailing front yard setback of a block or maximum setback of 20 feet, whichever is less. This is to reflect the Lake Elmo Design Standards and Guidelines Manual. • Veterinary Services Standards. The Commission requested that standards be added to veterinary services in order to help prevent large animals from being treated in the Village area. Page 2 City Council Meeting 5/2/2017 Regular Agenda item #11 Planning Commission and Public Hearing. The proposed ordinance includes changes recommended by the Planning Commission. Comments from the public hearing included concern over the density associated with the VMX zoning district. The Planning Commission made the following findings of fact in regards to the proposed ordinance: 1. That certain areas of the Old Village are guided for Urban Low Density Residential in the Land Use Plan of the Comprehensive Plan, which designates a density of 1.5-2.49 units per acre. 2 That there currently does not exist a Village Low Density Residential zoning district which has a density of 1.5-2.49 units per acre within the Zoning Code. 3. That the Village Low Density Residential zoning district is being proposed due to the imminence of the Gonyea West Development, which is expected to be proposed to be located within the Old Village in an area guided for Village Low Density Residential. 4. That the Planning Commission would be interested in exploring increased densities within the Old Village as an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. The Planning Commission recommended adoption of Ord. 03-175 with an affirmative vote of 7-0. FISCAL IMPACT: None. OPTIONS: The Council may: • Adopt Ord. 08-175 as proposed. • Amend Ord. 08-175 and adopt as amended. • Deny adoption of Ord. 08-175. RECOMMENDATION: Staff and the Planning Commission recommend that the Council adopt Ord. 08-175, approving an amendment to Article XIII: Village Mixed Use Districts, creating a Village Low Density Residential Zoning District and amending standards for the Village Mixed Use zoning district: "Move to adopt Ord. 08-1 75, approving an amendment to Article XIII: Village Mixed Use Districts, creating a Village Low Density Residential Zoning District and amending standards fir the Village Mixed Use zoning district." If Council adopts the above ordinance amendment, Staff also recommends that the Council adopt Resolution 2017-041 approving summary publication of Ord. 08-175. "Move to adopt Resolution 2017-041 approving summary publication of Ord. 08-1 75." ATTACHMENTS: • Ord. 08-175 • Summary Publication Resolution 2017-041 • V-LDR/VMX Item from Planning Commission Meeting Packet dated 4/24/2017 • Planning Commission Meeting Minutes 4/24/2017 pertaining to V-LDR/VMX Page 3 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-176 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby ordains the following properties to be rezoned from GB - General Business to VMX - Village Mixed Use: PIDs: 1302921230055 1302921320001 1302921320052 1302921210010 1302921120013 1302921230057 1302921230038 1302921320026 1302921320012 1302921120010 1302921230058 1302921230037 1302921230007 1302921240022 1302921120016 1302921320021 1302921320019 1302921320046 1302921220007 1302921120012 1302921230068 1302921210013 1302921230059 1302921220023 1302921120009 1302921320025 1302921210014 1302921310017 1302921220018 1302921120011 1302921230070 1302921210011 1302921210016 1302921220016 1302921120015 1302921320049 1302921210012 1302921310016 1302921220017 1302921120014 1302921320051 1302921210015 1302921230046 1302921220019 1302921220008 1302921320048 1302921320041 1302921230065 1302921220022 1302921220010 1302921320047 1302921320042 1302921230053 1302921220021 1302921240016 1302921240020 1302921320083 1302921240024 1302921220020 1302921220012 1302921310003 1302921230054 1302921240019 1302921240021 1302921230071 1302921230056 1302921210001 1302921240017 1302921210006 1302921210007 1302921320032 1302921320005 1302921230067 1302921220002 1302921220013 1302921320027 1302921230025 1302921240025 1302921220011 1302921220014 1302921230063 1302921230036 1302921210009 1302921230004 1302921210002 1302921320022 1302921230062 1302921230064 1302921320086 1302921320007 1302921320009 1302921320008 1302921320010 1302921320085 1302921320096 1302921320094 1302921230077 1302921230027 1302921230018 1302921230026 1302921230010 SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo also hereby ordains that the Zoning Administrator shall make the applicable changes to the official Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo.