HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ Minutes; 6-8-20
City of Lake Elmo
Planning Commission Meeting
Minutes of Monday June 8, 2020
Commissioner Cadenhead called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning
Commission at 7:00 p.m.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Cadenhead, Graen, Holtz, Mueller, Steil, and Weeks
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Risner
STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Roberts
Approve Agenda:
M/S/P: Steil/Weeks moved to approve the agenda, Vote: 6-0, motion carried
unanimously.
Public Hearing
Concept PUD Review – Schiltgen Farm property (10880 Stillwater Boulevard North)
Director Roberts presented the staff report explaining the proposed Concept PUD plan
for a 318-unit residential development on the site of the Schiltgen Farm property
located at 10880 Stillwater Boulevard.
Roberts noted that the proposed residential development will be located on the southern
portion of the Schiltgen Farm at the intersection of CSAH 14 (Stillwater Boulevard) and
CSAH 17 (Lake Elmo Avenue) and that the proposed development would have a mix of
single-family homes, villas style homes and attached single-family homes (townhouses)
with overall average density of 3 units per acre. The subdivision is proposed as a PUD
because the developer is requesting flexibility from the strict zoning regulations of the
Shoreland Ordinance and the VMX zoning regulations.
Director Roberts explained that the proposed concept PUD has a total of 318 housing units –
200 single family home sites and 118 townhouse or row home units on 105.3 acres (net)
with a density of about 3.0 dwelling units per acre (D.U.A). A western portion of the
development site is within the Shoreland Management Area of Sunfish Lake.
Roberts also noted that the Planning Commission needs to consider an amendment to the
City’s Comprehensive Plan. The current land use designation for the site of proposed
development is V-LDR (village low-density residential). This designation is intended for only
single-family residential uses. He explained that to have the mix of housing types as proposed
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-8-20
within this development, the City would need to approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment
to change the land use designation of the development site or the designation of the proposed
townhouse area south of Stillwater Boulevard to V-MDR (village medium density residential).
The City intends this land use designation for a variety of residential land uses including
detached single-family homes and attached single-family homes (town houses).
Director Roberts showed on the plans how the developer is proposing two primary types of
housing within this development – 200 single-family detached homes and 118 townhouse
or row homes that would have buildings with 4-6 units connected together. Based on this
mix of proposed housing, the City would need to approve an amendment to the land use
plan map for at least the townhouse portion of this site to V-MDR (Village Medium Density
Residential) for this project to move forward.
Roberts also clarified that the City intends the V-MDR land use designation for areas in the
Village Planning Area guided for single-family detached, duplexes and townhomes/villa
housing types. This land use designation has residential density ranges between 3.01 and 8
dwelling units per acre. As noted the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, “this land use allows for a
greater variety in housing stock and brings more people closer to living within easy access
of Village destinations and amenities.” As shown, the 19.92 acre area south of Stillwater
Boulevard is proposed to have 118 townhouses – an average of 5.92 units per acre.
Director Roberts noted that City staff sent the proposed concept plan to Washington County
for their review and comments and that County staff sent the City a response letter dated June
3, 2020. Roberts summarized several important issues and design elements noted by
Washington County that the developer will need to resolve as they move the project forward.
These include:
1. The County has prepared two preliminary concept designs for the redesign of the
intersection of County Road 17 and County Road 14. These two designs are
significantly different than the intersection plan shown by the developer. City
staff is recommending the developer coordinate and account for these
intersection designs in their designs for the preliminary plat/PUD plans.
2. As part of the platting process, the City and County will be requiring the developer
to dedicate additional right-of-way along County Road 17 (Lake Elmo Avenue)
and along realigned County Road 14 (Stillwater Boulevard) to meet County
standards. The CSAH 17 right-of-way requirement is 75 feet from the centerline
and the right-of-way requirement for County Road 14 is 180 feet total – 90 feet
from centerline. The County also will be requiring the developer to provide turn
lanes according to County requirements
3. The developer will need to clearly show the existing and proposed right-of-way
for the County Roads (and all City streets) on the proposed preliminary plat.
4. The County is recommending that access for the townhouse site on the south side
of County Road 14 be connected to the updated intersection at County Road 17.
The proposed access is now shown to the west of the existing intersection.
5. Revising the access point along County Road 14 as it less than the county’s ¼ mile
access guideline from County Road 17. The County suggests the developer use
Klondike Avenue as their access point as it is just over ¼ mile from the
intersection with County Road 17. This issue will require further analysis as the
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-8-20
existing location of Klondike Avenue could not provide access to the north side of
Stillwater Boulevard as it is west of the west property line of the project site.
6. The Washington County 2040 Comprehensive Plan identifies the Central
Greenway Regional Trail corridor along this section of Stillwater Boulevard. The
County will work with the City on the trail efforts and the trails should connect to
the subdivisions to the north, to the Old Village Center and Lake Elmo Elementary
School.
7. The Concept Plans do not reflect the regional pond as planned during the
Downtown Lake Elmo/CSAH 17/Lake Elmo Avenue improvement project. Staff
note: The project plans show locations for possible storm water ponding on the
site.
Roberts explained that because the requirements of Washington County will require
significant design changes to the parts of the development site adjacent to County Road 14, it
is staff’s opinion that it would be best for the developer to make changes to their concept
plans and resubmit them to the City. These changes would be to address the conditions as
outlined by Washington County before proceeding further with the City review of the Concept
PUD.
Director Roberts summarized the City Engineer comments as outlined in the letter dated
June 3, 2020. The City Engineer has recommended the developer revise the concept plan
before any formal City review and comment as this would be the opportunity to address
several key design elements that will likely result in significant plan layout. The City
Engineer provided comments about stormwater management, sanitary sewer and water
availability and the timing of those possible improvements.
Roberts noted that the City Engineer’s memorandum provides a review of municipal sewer
and water considerations. One issue of importance is the need to get sanitary sewer to this
development site. The tentative plan is to extend sanitary sewer to the site from the south
nd
form the Village area after the City extends sanitary along 32 Street. The timing of this
improvement project has not yet been finalized by the City. Director Roberts explained that
the City Engineer recommended that the City should not accept an application for
preliminary plat/PUD approval for this site until after the City has awarded a construction
contract for the sanitary sewer improvements to the south to ensure the final design and
timing of those improvements are known to the City and to the developer. The City
Engineer suggests that the preliminary plat and preliminary PUD Plans submittal include a
detailed proposal showing the sanitary sewer connection.
Director Roberts noted that staff is recommending that the Planning Commission
recommend approval of the PUD Concept Plan for the Schiltgen Farm property located 10880
Stillwater Boulevard subject to the conditions listed in the staff report. He then answered
questions from the Planning Commission.
Mr. Ben Schmidt of the Excelsior Group, representing the developer, gave a short
presentation about the proposed concept plan and answered questions from the Planning
Commission.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-8-20
Cadenhead opened the public hearing at 7:47 pm
Mr. Jose Chavez, 3505 Kelvin Avenue North, provided information about his land-locked
parcel of land that is to the west of the proposed development. He indicated that he
was pleased to see the concept plan showing an access to his property and that he has
documentation showing his property could be buildable once it has access to a public
street.
Adam Johnson, 10550 Stillwater Blvd. North, commented that he is concerned about
the density of the proposed development and the affects it could have on Sunfish Lake.
Stephanie Olson, 3308 Kraft Circle North, spoke about the proposed development
would bring many changes to the area, asked why people want to live in Lake Elmo (the
nature, rural character and small town feel), that changes should benefit the whole
community and that the area proposed for townhouses could be a City commons, public
park or gathering place.
Colton Mollerud, 3308 Kraft Circle North, expressed concerns about how the design of
the development would change the drive into the City from the west along County Road
14, the project density and how the proposed development would change the character
and feel of Lake Elmo.
Mary Supina, trustee for the property located at 3360 Klondike Avenue North,
questioned the proposed density of the development and how it would be inconsistent
with the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, especially the area south of Stillwater
Boulevard, and that having townhouses in that area would be inconsistent with the
character of the area.
Steven Olson at 3503 Kelvin Avenue North, expressed concerns about maintaining the
undeveloped areas near the lake in perpetuity, the design of the storm water
management and ponding system to protect the lake from negative impacts and how
the intersection of County Road 14 and County Road 17 would be impacted by the
increase in traffic.
Todd Bruchu, 3150 Klondike Avenue, noted concerns about the proposed project
density and the need for new ball fields and City parks with the growth of the City’s
population.
rd
Ms. Susan Dunn, 11018 Upper 33 Street North, commented that she did not support
having townhouses or row housing in the development and that storm water ponding
and safe drinking water are concerns that the City should take into consideration.
Cadenhead closed the public hearing at 8:10 pm.
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-8-20
The Commission discussed the proposed concept plan and the changes that will be
necessary to the plans based on the comments from Washington County and from the
City Engineer.
M/S/P: Steil/Holtz move to recommend approval of the Concept PUD Plans as proposed
by the Excelsior Group for Schiltgen Farm property with the recommended findings and
conditions of approval, Vote: 5-1 (Weeks no), motion carried.
M/S/P: Steil/Holtz move to approve proposed land use plan change from V-LDR to V-
MDR for site of the Concept PUD Plan as proposed by the Excelsior Group for Schiltgen
Farm property. Vote: 2-4 (Steil and Weeks ayes), motion failed.
New Business
None
Staff and Commission Updates
Roberts reported that at the June 2, 2020 City Council meeting, the Council considered
the proposed zoning text amendment for farm or rural schools and decided to have staff
do further research and bring it back to them in July. They also considered the
proposed front yard setback zoning text amendment which failed on a 2-3 vote. The
Council also considered the proposed Comprehensive Plan Amendments for the City-
owned property located at County Road 14 and Ideal Avenue. After some discussion,
they tabled action on those changes to allow the City Engineer to prepare a very
preliminary, high-level sanitary sewer study for the area.
Roberts reminded the Commission of the upcoming PC Meetings on June 22, 2020 and
July 13, 2020.
Meeting adjourned at 9:00 pm
Respectfully submitted,
Ken Roberts – Lake Elmo Planning Director
Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 6-8-20