Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
PZ Agenda packet; 8-26-19
THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North (651) 747-3900 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 www.lakeelmo.org NOTICE OF MEETING The City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission will conduct a meeting on Monday August 26, 2019 at 7:00 p.m. AGENDA 1. Pledge of Allegiance 2. Approve Agenda 3. Approve Minutes a. August 12,2019? 4. Public Hearings a. Variance Requests - 9447 Stillwater Blvd. 5. New Business a. Review April 2019 Revisions to Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual 6. Communications/Updates a. City Council Update 8-20-2019 Meeting Carmelites Chapel—Variance and CUP Four Corners Second Addition Final PUD and Final Plat b. Staff Updates c. Upcoming PC Meetings: 1. September 9,2019 2. September 23,20 7. Adjourn ***Note:Every effort will be made to accommodate person or persons that need special considerations to attend this meeting due to a health condition or disability.Please contact the Lake Elmo City Clerk if you are in need of special accommodations. TI It: CITY OF LAKE ELMO City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of August 12, 2019 Commissioner Weeks called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Cadenhead, Hartley, Holtz, Steil and Weeks COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Risner STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Roberts, Chief Malmquist Approve Agenda: M/S/P: Hartley/Holtz move to modify the agenda to allow Union Park to be reviewed before the Subdivision public hearing, Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Approve Minutes: M/S/P: Hartley/Steil, move to approve the July 22, 2019 minutes as presented, Vote: 5- 0, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearings Carmelite Hermitage (8249 Demontreville Trail) Roberts reported that Rev. John Burns of the Carmelite Hermitage has applied for a variance from the City Code requirement about direct access for a place of worship to add a chapel to the Carmelite's site located at 8249 Demontreville Trail. An applicant must establish and demonstrate compliance with the variance criteria set forth in Lake Elmo City Code Section 154.109 before the City may grant an exception or modification to city code requirements. 1) Practical Difficulties. A variance to the provision of this chapter may be granted by the Board of Adjustment upon the application by the owner of the affected property where the strict enforcement of this chapter would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual property under consideration and then only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter. Definition of practical difficulties - "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 variance, means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control. FINDINGS: The addition of a chapel to Carmelites site has been planned since at least 1991 when the City first approved a Master Plan for their site. The Carmelites have been using the easement to Demontreville Trail for access to the site since that time. Adding another driveway or access to the Carmelites property would be a practical difficulty as the only public street their property has frontage on is Hidden Bay Trail to south. A new driveway would be about 1,500 feet in length, would require extensive tree removal and grading and would be an access onto a local street— not a collector or arterial street as the City Code requires for places of worship. The use of the existing driveway for access to Demontreville Trail for the addition of a chapel to site is a reasonable use of the property and the existing access. 2) Unique Circumstances. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. FINDINGS: According to the applicant, the existing lot layout with the access easement to Demontreville Trail has been in place since 1904. This is a unique situation with circumstances not created by the landowner or the current land users—the Carmelite Monks. 3) Character of Locality. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the locality in which the property in question is located. FINDINGS: The proposed variance will allow the Carmelites to use the existing driveway (that currently provides access to their site) for access for the proposed chapel. By using the existing driveway that has been in place for many years, the Carmelites will not be altering the essential character of the locality (or area) in which their property is located. Conversely, adding another driveway to their site that would have access onto a local, neighborhood street would change the character of that locality and area of the City. 4) Adjacent Properties and Traffic. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to properties adjacent to the property in question or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. FINDINGS. The proposed variance to allow the use of the existing driveway and easement for access for the proposed chapel will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to properties adjacent to the subject property, increase congestion of public streets or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. Conversely, as I noted above, if the applicant added another driveway to access the streets to the south of their site that would increase the congestion on the local public streets near their property. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 John Burns discussed a few of the issues that exist between the two properties that share the driveway access onto Demontreville Trail. He mentioned that they have the support of approximately 50 percent of the neighboring properties and feels they have a good history with the neighbors and with Lake Elmo. He reiterated there will not be the establishment of a Catholic Parrish on the site, nor will it be developed with residences and that the chapel is not being created to increase traffic. Father Patrick McCorkle from the Jesuit Retreat stated that this is not merely a squabble between two property owners. He feels the increase traffic will ruin the atmosphere and purpose of the Retreat Hall as a quiet place away from the noise of everyday life. He also believes that the variance is at odds with the surrounding residential area. Bryan Huntington attorney for the Jesuits stated that the applicant could not prove that the circumstances were not created by the land owner. He also disputed which easement agreement between the property owners was the most accurate and valid. Garry VanCleavey attorney for Jesuit Retreat House stated that the Carmelite nuns fundraised for the chapel that will hold 44 people due to interest in having morning and evening mass services for the public. VanCleavey stated that multiple services in a day would be an expansion on the use of the property. He also stated that this is a use variance which is illegal in the State of Minnesota. Eric Lipman, 8249 Deer Pond Ct N stated that the driveway easement existed prior to the Jesuit Retreat House being present and it does have direct access through that easement. He also stated that the Jesuits suggested that 50 people a week attend the Retreat House, which is a more intense use of the road than the Carmelite's are proposing. Paul Gelbmann, 5034 Isle Avenue N asked if there is currently a mass that is open to the public at the convent, how often it meets, and how many people could the space hold? It was answered that there is a currently a daily mass open to the public that could hold up to 60 people in the space used. Terry Quinn, 9220 Jane Rd N, stated that his family donated the gate system as you enter the site. He stated that he is disappointed in the squabble between the properties and is opposite to the spirit the donation was made. He said that he lives in the area, has been to the site, and believes that the variance should be granted. Hartley said he was not convinced a variance is needed but understands that it is needed to provide clarity to allow the new chapel of the property. He also believes that the suggestion to move the driveway from the existing access point would be a less desirable outcome for everyone. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 Weeks agreed with Hartley and added that the request from the Jesuits for silence is not currently met by any of the adjacent parcels nor is it feasible to ask. Weeks added that it appears this property meets the requirements of a variance and added that the Jesuits with their 3000 visitors annually have a significant impact on their neighboring properties. Holtz said that the proposed chapel holding 44 people is more similar to a classroom than a church with a capacity of 900 people. He believes the need is not self-inflicted by the property owners; the access easement existed prior to the code changes. He explained how he believes the proposal meets the requirements. M/S/P: Steil /Hartley, move to approve the request from Rev. John Burns of the Carmelite Hermitage for a variance from the City's requirement for direct access to a major collector or arterial street for a place of worship for the property located at 8249 Demontreville Trail, Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. M/S/P: Hartley/Cadenhead, move to approve the conditional use permit for the Carmelite Hermitage including the proposed chapel for the property located at 8249 Demontreville Road with recommended findings and conditions of approval as drafted by Staff. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Recess from 8:14—8:20 pm Kwik Trip Fuel Station/Convenience Store (Inwood Avenue N. and 5th Street North) Roberts explained that RPS Legacy Desoto is proposing a minor subdivision of Outlot 0 of the Inwood Addition into three separate parcels. The proposed minor subdivision would allow for Kwik Trip to purchase the 2.27 acre property and construct a new fuel station/convenience store on the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue North and 5tn Street North. The applicant also is requesting that the City vacate the existing easements on and around Outlot 0 as part of this plat approval. City staff is recommending as a condition of approval that the plat or subdivision show a 10-foot- wide drainage and utility easement along the entire perimeter of the plat and property. RPS Legacy Desoto Properties and Kwik Trip, Inc. are requesting a conditional use permit (CUP) for the construction of a Kwik Trip convenience store/fuel station with a car wash. The City Code requires approval of a Conditional Use Permit for this request in the Commercial zoning district. Roberts mentioned that the applicant will need to pay the City a parkland dedication fee in the amount of$10,215, the design of the western driveway access onto 5t" Street must be revised to accommodate only right turns and the width of the eastern driveway may need to be modified to 40 feet in width to allow for one inbound lane and two outbound lanes. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 The Planning Commission had discussion regarding traffic movement, easement, setbacks, lot lines, and driveways. Dean George on behalf of Kwik Trip answered that the lot lines will be left to the developer. Alan Stocker, 8680 Upper 7t" St N, talked about the proposal for being open 24 hours, sound and light concerns, signage concerns, and a request for increased landscape buffering, such as evergreens. He mentioned the current traffic situation and concerns about additional vehicles. Larry Boyle 8699 Lower 81" PI N, reiterated the desire for an evergreen buffer and concerns about getting out on to 5t" St. Additional questions regarding traffic safety from the Planning Commission, including right turn lanes, traffic signals, Washington County's review, etc. Weeks mentioned that businesses pay higher taxes than residential properties and need to be seen to be able to thrive, so limiting signage and visibility can have negative effects. M/S/P: Holtz/Hartley, move to approve the Minor Subdivision request to split Outlot O of Inwood Addition into three lots, subject to the conditions of approval as listed in the staff report. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. M/S/P: Holtz/Hartley, move to approve the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Kwik Trip fuel station/convenience store and car wash to be located on the southeast corner of Inwood Avenue and 5t" Street North, subject to the conditions of approval as drafted by Staff and based on the findings of fact listed in the Staff Report. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. New Business Union Park First Addition Easement Vacations and Final Plat (5Lh Street N. and Julia Ave.) Pulte Homes of Minnesota is requesting approval of easement vacations and the Final Plat to create lots for 62 townhomes located on 7.92 acres. This proposed final plat is the first phase of a 240 townhouse residential development. Roberts reported that the project was previously called Bentley Village, it received prior approval in March for up to 240 townhomes on the site. They are now seeking Final Plat which is consistent with the approved preliminary plat. They were originally proposing a pool and now are proposing a dog park. The proposed final plat shows the division of the property into separate lots, one that will be sold for the Spring apartment development, and the others will be used for Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 different phases of this development and a ponding area, it also includes the street right-of-way for 5t" Street North and for future Julia Avenue. The applicant is requesting the City vacate two existing drainage and utility easements that were placed on the property when Savona was developed. The developer cannot record a new final plat with the existing easements in place. These easements are both just south of 5t" Street and will not be needed as the developer will be constructing new utilities and will be dedicating new easements with the final plat. Savona Park is located just over 500 feet from the northern edge of the proposed development and meets the Neighborhood Park search area requirement. The developer is proposing and staff recommends that fees in lieu of land be paid in order to satisfy the park dedication requirements. The developer will be required to 10% of the purchase price of the land as park dedication. Hartley asked about the dead end roads shown on the plan. Roberts explained that there will need to be temporary cul-de-sacs constructed. Paul Hoyer, Pulte Homes, 7500 Flying Cloud, Suite 670 Eden Prairie, MN 55344. He explained there will be a pond included in this phase and one included in the next phase. He explained the plan is one phase per year for development. He also explained Pulte issues a property disclosure statement to homeowners that include things like the watering ban so that they are informed at the time of purchasing. M/S/P: Hartley/Cadenhead, move to approve the vacation of the two drainage and utility easements on site of the Union Park final plat as shown on the drainage and utility easement vacation exhibits dated 1-03-2019 and 1-17-2019. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. M/S/P: Cadenhead/Steil, move to approve the Union Park First Addition Final Plat with recommended findings and conditions of approval. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearing Subdivision Ordinance Update Roberts explained the changes to the ordinance language. Hartley asked if the language should be changed about the Parks Commission reviewing the Final Plat. Discussion followed M/S/P: Hartley/Steil, move to approve the Subdivision Ordinance with the changes discussed, Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 City Council Updates—July 16, 2019 Roberts reported that the Accessory Building size and Parking and Screening ordinances had been approved by City Council. The Council approved the size ordinance and removed the language requiring a durable surface for trailers. Staff Updates 1. Upcoming Planning Commission Meetings a. September 9, 2019—Another senior housing facility is being proposed in the Eagle Point Office Park. The applicant believes there is not a market for offices in the current market and that proximity to services is a good fit for the 100 unit development. b. August 26, 2019—there are two potential variances. c. Met Council is still missing one item for the Comprehensive Plan review that the City has submitted twice, then the application is complete and review will begin. Meeting adjourned at 9:35 pm Respectfully submitted, Tanya Nuss Permit Technician Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 8-12-19 1 THE CITY OF STAFF REPORT LAKE ELMO DATE: 8/26/19 REGULAR ITEM#: 4—PUBLIC HEARING MOTION TO: Planning Commission FROM: Ben Prchal, City Planner AGENDA ITEM: Variance Requests-9447 Stillwater Blvd. REVIEWED BY: Ken Roberts, Planning Director BACKGROUND: The City has received variance requests from applicant Todd Alguire for the property located at 9447 Stillwater Blvd. The request of the applicant is for a variance from the City Code requirement of not allowing an accessory building closer to the front lot line than the principle building. Staff met with the resident and discussed with them the constraints of the site. The initially proposed location would have required two variances, one for the front lot line and the second for the setback to the OHWL of Freidrich pond. These conversations lead the applicant to shift the shed so that only a variance would be required from the front lot line. Beyond this the applicant is also seeking a variance for the height of the structure. ISSUE BEFORE COMMISSION: The Commission is being asked to hold a public hearing, review, and make a recommendation(s) on the requested variances. REVIEW/ANALYSIS: PID 15.029.21.34.0007 Existing Land Use/Zoning: Single-family zone as Rural Single Family. Surrounding Land Use/ Single family homes zoned as Rural Single Family. Zoning: History: There are not substantial records for the property in the City Files. Deadline for Action: Application Complete—7/27/2019 60 Day Deadline—9/25/2019 Extension Letter Mailed—N/A 120 Day Deadline—N/A Applicable Regulations: • Article V-Zoning Administration and Enforcement • Article XVIII—Shoreland Management Overlay District • Article XI—Rural Districts 2 PROPOSED VARIANCES Variance Requests. The applicant is requesting to build an accessory building closer to the front lot line than the principle structure. The City Code addresses accessory building and currently proposed design would also exceed the maximum allowed height of 22 ft. Accessory structures are limited to 22 ft. or the principle structure, whichever is more restrictive. The needed variances are outlined in the tables and an in-depth explanation is provided below the tables. Standard Required Proposed Setback from the Front Property Line. 30 ft. 342.1 ft. Or Closer to the Front lot The Principle Structure line than the home. Structure Height 22 ft. 25 ft. Standards Met. The following table outlines the standards that are met on the Pro pert . Standard Required Proposed Allowed Structure Size (6.6 Acres) 2,000 sqft. 1,600 sqft. Or Footprint of the Principle Structure Structure setback from OHWL of Recreational 150 feet (66.5 average) 150.5 feet Development(RD) Lake Drainfield setback from occupied structure 20 feet 25 feet Side yard setback 10 feet 42 feet Front yard setback 30 feet 342.1 feet Rear Yard setback 40 feet 61 feet Reason for Variance Requests The applicant is requesting the variance for the structure to be located closer to the front lot line because of the geographic features of the lot and location of the home leaves very limited space behind the home. Furthermore, the applicant is also requesting a variance from the structure height requirement. The applicant would like to build a two story shed and has met the requirement that the structure cannot be taller than the principle structure but the code places a second limiting factor, stating that accessory buildings also cannot be taller than 22 ft. The applicable sections of code will be outlined below. APPLICABLE CODE 154.40 Accessory Structures,Rural Districts: When reviewing the criteria for an accessory structure Staff will go to a few different sections of the City Code. However, the applicant is only needing a variance for two items, both listed in 154.406. Height: The important point here is that the applicant has designed the shed so that it would not exceed the height of the principle structure. With the home being 291/2 ft. in height the accessory structure was designed at 29 ft. in height. However, the code also reads that accessory buildings cannot exceed 22 ft. in height. The current design exceeds the maximum height allowance by 7 ft. Because of this, a variance is being sought for the proposed height of the accessory structure. 3 154.406 Accessory Structures, Rural Districts.) Structure Height, Rural Districts. No accessory building shall exceed twenty-two (22) feet in height or the height of the principal structure, with the exception of agricultural buildings, as defined in§154.213. Building projections or features on accessory structures that are not agricultural buildings, as defined in §154.213, such as chimneys, cupolas, and similar decorations that do not exceed twenty-five (25)feet in height are permitted in rural districts. 154.213 Accessory Buildings and Structures, Generally) B. Definitions. Agricultural Building.An accessory building means a structure that is on agricultural land as determined by the governing assessor of the City under section 273.13, subdivision 23 and meets all other requirements of State Statute 362B.103. A Minnesota Pollution Control Agency permit may be required. BUILDING HEIGHT. The vertical distance from the average of the highest and lowest point of grade for that portion of the lot covered by building to the highest point of the roof for flat roofs; to the roof deck line of mansard roofs; and to the mean height between eaves and highest ridge for gable, hip, and gambrel roofs. When reviewing accessory building TO.H. 5--4- requests Staff has uses the "Building mu.heigM Height" definition as the standard for determining the height of structures. The diagram to the right lists out the mean hei gw different measure points that are mofmid in1 listed out in the definition. If the height variance is denied for the ILX OR applicant, there would be the option to seek out Washington County and consult with them on having the 3 property reclassified as outlined in section 154.213. If that were to happen Staff does not necessarily see i 4'O.H. Z'-1 0"oPee why the applicant would be restricted .� to the 22 ft. height requirement. At this point Staff does not believe a ; _ the request to have a structure taller than what is allowed meets the L t --- a � criteria for variance approval. 5==y - However,the last sentence in section q ,__► e , 154.406 does allow structures to exceed the 22 ft. height requirement h--1 _ y with specifically listed items. If the 5==1 Commission believes that the upper 4'landing 17 T®10-15'-10" roof/window qualifies as a decorative attachment this could put the applicant in a more favorable position. If this is determined to be the case then the highest point would be measured at a lower position which would bring all the other measurements down. Then the projection would have to be reduced down to 25 ft. Staff does believe there would be grounds to make this determination as the applicant has added this window to match the design of the home, constituting a"similar decoration." 4 Setback: As previously noted accessory buildings cannot be located closer to the front property line than the principle structure. Geographic constraints coupled with the location of the home would make construction in the side or rear yard difficult. There is also a shared driveway for the property addressed as 9495 Stillwater Blvd. This driveway is on the east side of the home,placing a structure on the east side of the lot would drastically impede the function of the driveway. 154.406 Accessory Structures, Rural Districts.) Structure Location, Rural Districts. No detached garages or other accessory buildings shall be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on that lot. AGENCY REVIEW There have not been any comments submitted from other agencies or departments. RECOMMENDED FINDINGS An applicant must establish and demonstrate compliance with the variance criteria set forth in Lake Elmo City Code Section 154.017 before an exception or modification to city code requirements can be granted. These criteria are listed below, along with comments from Staff regarding applicability of these criteria to the applicant's request. 1) Practical Difficulties. A variance to the provision of this chapter may be granted by the Board of Adjustment upon the application by the owner of the affected property where the strict enforcement of this chapter would cause practical difficulties because of circumstances unique to the individual rp opertX under consideration and then only when it is demonstrated that such actions will be in keeping with the spirit and intent of this chapter. Definition of practical difficulties - "Practical difficulties" as used in connection with the granting of a variance,means that the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by an official control. 5 FINDINGS: • Variance for Height of Structure: The applicant has attempted to design the structure in a way that would I mimic the design of the home. Although the building exceeds the 22 foot height requirement the structure was designed to be visually pleasing by matching the principle structure. Because the resemblance is similar to the principle building the request does appear to be so sss so 9�a reasonable. ____ __ i • Variance for Accessory Building Setback: The request JEWAY--------- - R - 9----------+ does appear to be reasonable because any other location --------------------- meeting the code requirements would not be possible. The i PROPOSED APPR0XI 150 setback requirement from the lake would make SOX3: i- �\MOUND SHED ♦SVSiEM ✓-^ -:.. �+ FL0OR_920.0 placement behind the home on the west side impossible - and placing the structure on the east side of the home ��___19---;5 would interfere with the shared driveway to the home south of the property (9495 Stillwater Blvd.). The applicant , would be hard pressed to locate a building site that would not require a single variance. Because of this Staff believes this criteria is met. 2) Unique Circumstances. The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner. FINDINGS: • Variance for Height of Structure: Staff has had difficulty determining the unique circumstance that would warrant approval of the structures height. The property is not currently used for agricultural purposes, beyond personal enjoyment. Geographically the build site is relatively flat so there is not a conflict when measuring the height of the building. Staff does not believe this criteria is met. • Variance for Accessory Building Setback: The current structure was built prior to the current owner so there is no way the applicant would have been able to suggest a different building location for the principle structure to avoid the need for this variance. Beyond limited space in the rear of the home Friedrich Pond requires a 150 ft. buffer which is impossible to meet if the structure were to be placed in the rear yard. Furthermore, the structure would severely impede the function of the driveway if the shed were located on the east side of the home. Staff believes this criteria is met. 3) Character of Locality. The proposed variance will not alter the essential character of the locality in which the property in question is located. FINDINGS: • Variance for Height of Structure:Although the structure may be measurably taller than some of the neighboring homes, according to the survey the foundation would be about 4 feet lower than the neighboring homes foundation. Staff believes this criteria is met. • Variance for Accessory Building Setback: Although the structure would be located in front of the home, the proposed building location would not change the character of the local area. Staff believes this criteria is met. 6 f 02'32"E 6 9?� i6.90 7. 59 19. \ \\ I \ \ \ PROPOS D \\ \\ APPR 5OX32 1 \\ \ MOUI SHED \ \\ Y5T rn FLOOR=920.0 \\ \\ 4) Adjacent Properties and Traffic. The proposed variance will not impair an adequate supply of light and air to properties adjacent to the property in question or substantially increase the congestion of the public streets or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood. FINDINGS. • Variance for Height of Structure: The structure would not be of such a height that it would begin to shade neighboring properties or structures, nor would it impair airflow. Furthermore, the height would not cause an increase of traffic or congestion of traffic. • Variance for Accessory Building Setback: The location of the structure would not shade the neighboring properties or structures, nor would it impair airflow. Furthermore, the location would not cause an increase of traffic or congestion of traffic. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS 1. That the Applicant obtain all applicable permits including but not limited to a City building permit including a grading, erosion control, and storm water management plan approved by the City Engineer. 2. That the Applicant must reduce the height of the building to 22 ft.unless the property is reclassified to Agricultural. If reclassified, the applicant can increase the structures height to 25 ft. 3. If approved this variance approval is valid for 1 year and would expire on XXX. (date Set after council approval) 4. One of the other smaller accessory buildings noted on the survey must be removed prior to the issuance of a building permit of the new accessory structure. FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed variance is not expected to have fiscal impact to the City. OPTIONS: The Commission may: • Recommend approval of the proposed variances, subject to recommended findings and conditions of approval. • Amend the recommended findings and conditions and recommend approval of the variances, subject to the newly outlined findings and conditions of approval. • Move to recommend denial of all variances, citing findings for denial. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval with the following motion: "Move to recommend approval of the request from Todd Alguire for a variance from the following standards:structure setback from the front property line and the proposed location in front of the principle structure, subject to recommended conditions of approval," ATTACHMENTS: 1) Narrative 2) Survey and Building Plans 3) Additional Pictures ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction........................................................................................Planning Staff - Report by Staff...................................................................................Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission............................Chair& Commission Members - Open the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Close the Public Hearing..................................................................................Chair - Discussion by the Commission..............................Chair& Commission Members - Action by the Commission.....................................Chair& Commission Members July 25, 2019 Dear City of Lake Elmo, My name is Todd Alguire and I live at 9447 Stillwater Blvd N, I am applying for a permit to build a garage on my property. I am submitting a copy of the site plan/new Survey to you and prints. As you can see where my house is positioned on the 6.38 acres I have No room to build this garage behind my house, however I have plenty of land in the front towards the railroad tracks. Where I have it positioned on the lot it would be shielded by trees and wouldn't be Intrusive to any of the neighbors. I have provided a print of my Home and also the new Garage print. As you can see I designed it to look a lot like my home with the roof lines and style. The new garage roof will not exceed the Height of our home. Also it is down hill elevation of about 6ft and about 200ft from the house. The siding will match the homes LP 6" new siding and the windows will also match. Color match as well. The only Variance am asking for, Is the location of the new building which I explained above with no space behind my home. The layout of this project will be Beautiful and fit the land perfectly, I am a very meticulous person and I have done many improvements to the land and house to make this fit and function very well on the lot. If any other questions arise please call me prior to the Council meeting or I will be at the meeting and can be asked at that time. Im really looking forward to get going on this soon, I appreciate you're help on this for me and my family to enjoy this extra space. Than �r Todd Alguire 612-412-6498 9447 Stillwater Blvd N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 A.LGUIRE -- � POSS IBLE PR/VATE%� - I DRIVEWAY NO"DOCUMENTSOVD' 1 PERMISS �-*---�3 ,PSE UNDETERM/NED.ION OF \ RESIDENCE i _- PARGvEL�_ - _ SHAREDDRIVEWAY NO ___ __-�- m OWNED BY`�T��`. OCUMENTS PROVIDED. 're OTHERSvvv I I \ A \ S00° 2' " Q� s� 9aa o 0 sHED - ,- 65G.32E 90 m/ CONTACT: T — — — — FENCE � I I � - - -- -- -- - —_VERIFY - - --- FE N E GRAVEL DRIVEWAY _ 19 ALIGUIRE GRAVEL DRIVEWAY -- —� - -- � 9447 TODDSTILLWATER BLVD.N. -- �--�----- ry BITUMINOUS \ ------ a LAKE ELMO,MN 55042110 - s __ wm -------- ------- ----- J— ❑ war 612-412-6498 N 19. x 3 w I x � \ I zry \ \ I x\ PROPOS D `� APPROXIXI WALL MATE SOX32 MOUND SEPTIC SHFD SH I ——— M \a' FLOORED M 0 N 0.0 I \ ---____-- T �— t °, WELL COUNTY/CITY: g� I I - � m o °� _ o P I WASH 1 N GTO N I I I sF �� 3 --EAST LINE OF THE SEI 4 OF \ MANHOLE I as THE SWI 4 OF SEC. 15 �''"' tl Exlsrwc w p C 1 TY O F z x � II c / \DRAINFIELD AR�q - �. A t a o I I �, m �o• � �� � ��. o a � _� L.4 IG E ELM O s SHED o r _ 1 1 HwL J _ i APPROXIMAT _ FLOOD ELEVATION I I � � UI OYD C,2 wW W 1 ' , � N I z l d A w _ w D 920 I• = I — ---- ' e coo 1 w w/ APPROXIMATE W EDGE OF -� WETLAND PER / w AIR PHOTO o w 1,910 APPROXIMATE w — EDGE OF I• I -1 WETLAND PER o N REVISIONS: vJ /) I I AIR OTO Ilk'--ICE ELEVATION FRIEDRICH POND ', '�` -- 906 DATE REVISION 4-9-15=9ob.9 4-10-18 INITIAL ISSUE MN DNR DIV.OF WATERS PROTECTED WATERS \ 1 7-24-19 PROPOSED SHED I 82-108W. 100 YEAR FLOOD PER VALLEY 7-30-19 REVISED I BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT=913.1. NO KNOWN ORDINARY HIGH WATER ELEVATION B-1-19 SE LEGEND SET IRON PIPE ---5 - - MARKED RLS 25718 ) NnaxEo aLs�saao - SET I/2'IRON PIPE _ o MARKED RLS 25715 - WEST LINE OF THE EAST 430.2 FEET OF THE 0 Er,Eo RIN eIII ILE 5EI/4 OF THE SWI/4 OF SEC. 15 g y j "oLE O t f_ FENCEw 21083 GRAVEL - --W 425.17 Ev T-11CSILNA1 - GRAVEL w� 636.00 -- o E SFORMER 9®0 I Q o 8 N00"02'32"W X ° ` CONIFEROUS TREE �CERTIFICATION: c 9p I I I P 11 x O o' I.1 sTREE I hereby certify that this plan was prepared by Q I GRAVEL w r\ I ® ANN""tcrlo" me,or under my direct supervision,and that I am -33 yll y a duly Licensed Land Surveyor under the laws of ® the state of Minnesota. °m °LE®° ®oa"n l" aTa -) (IN SQUARE FEET) ®°f® 0 Dame L. hurmes Registration tuber:25718 LEGAL DESCRIPTION: \ EXISTING IMPROVEMENT AREAS: `°'I"°I`AT°""`VE Date:4_10_18___ (AS SHOWN ON CONTRACT FOR DEED DOC.NO.4042354) HOUSE=2,869 ouE PROJECT LOCATION: SHED BY GARAGE=245 The East Four Hundred Thirty and Two Tenths(430.2)feet of the Southeast FRONT DECK=220 Quarter of the Southwest Quarter(SE 1/4 of SW 1/4)of section Fifteen(15),in REAR DECK=394 9 4 4 - 33"WIDE \ Township Twenty-Nine(29)North,of Range Twenty-one west,Village of Lake NORTH SHED=251 EASEMENT AS Elmo,Washington County,Minnesota,lying south of the Southerly right-of-way LEAN-TO=146 STI LLWATER BLVD. N. SHOWN ON of the Chicago,St.Paul&Omaha Railway.excepting therefrom the South Four GRAVEL DRIVEWAY=3,983 wATERNAIN I VARIO AND MAPPING. Hundred Fifty-five and Four-Tenths(455.4)feet thereof.Containing 6.6 acres, BITUMINOUS DRIVEWAY=7,073 uRB TryPI-] I I NOTveRIFiED more or less. CONCRETE=1,333 Izao—coNrouRsmnnu°Anl PID#1502921340007 WALLS=514 AREA: LAKE WALLS&CONIC.=531 amtnwc UNE TOTAL EXISTING=17,559 —amf I E Suite III I TOTAL AREA AS SHOWN=278,103 SQ.FT./6.38 ACRES MORE OF LESS �coNc E suar.cE N ET � 6750 Stillwater Blvd.N. Stillwater,MN 55082' I I I Phone 651.275.8969 Fax 651.275.8976 I TITLE NOTES: CALL BEFORE YOU DIG' cssurve Y ® Gopher State One Call net NO TITLE WORK WAS PROVIDED TO US FOR THE PREPARATION OF THIS SURVEY. + -IN Cl-AREA:651-454-0002 EASEMENTS AND OR ENCUMBRANCES MAY EXIST THAT ARE NOT SHOWN. TOU_FREE: 1-800-252-1166 I I II I _33- I BENCHMARKS ELEVATIONS SHOWN ARE BASED ON GPS DERIVED VALUES FOR NAVD 88 © SET OFFSET HUB I 25. PROPOSED ELEVATION NORTH I SURVEY NOTES: -930-.- PROPOSED CONTOUR 0 40 80 CORNERSTONE + LAND SURVEYING, INC. a PROPOSED DRAINAGE 3�Sr S I I. BEARINGS ARE BASED ON COORDINATES SUPPLIED BY THE RAMSEY COUNTY SURVEYORS OFFICE. x 40s.o DENOTES EXISTING ELEV. T.I 2.THERE MAY SOME UNDERGROUND UTILITIES,GAS,ELECTRIC,ETC.NOT FILE NAME SURVZZ485 SHOWN OR LOCATED. sF DENOTES SILT FENCE PROJECT NO. ZZ18485 3. CONTOURS SHOWN PER DNR LIDAR DATA OBTAINED FROM THE MNTOPO q3D -- EXISTING CONTOURS - WEBSITE. NOT FIELD VERIFIED. CERTIFICATE OF - 4. PROPOSED SEPTIC FROM SKETCH PROVIDED BY THE OWNER. I� ENVIRONMENTAL DESIGN GROUP DATED MAY 2018. SURVEY o G 'C! Cr �N Q- � O O O\ Q7 C) CD W n � CD �, o .a o o aCD � CD C° P P CDC CD O� CD CD CD ¢ p, p CD CD G. �] CD C 56' 2'-6" 10' 13' 15'-6" 12'-6" 2'-6" x8 continuous ledger x x O (3)2x 2's w/ O O (2) x8's nCD (3)jaib studs LV header n LVL eader n (2)2 8's CD CD ¢ CD CD CD CD CD Z CD UQ moo. S � Uo � aa� I Ot Q CD _ I I ¢. ¢. O a I I .. o � CD CD CD CD I I I I I L--- - - ------- - J L- - ------ - - ------ - - ----- - - -- - rn CD CD sloped fl or _ CD 0 0 'TJ = 0 = 0 ° °c � CD �czz O N I O O O CD ° �' N A COLO 00 O —CD CD CD CD CD � � O I I 12G. CD D - CDC flus o Sn `-� CD p ^ I �. CD a1 O p N W 5 C k � �4 CD I I ° C>2 O I � O I I O CD I O O VOQ n c) ~' a CD v, a CADCD v, - - - - - - — — - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ems — - - - - - — L--------------------�---- -- ----------------------- -----------------------�— -- -- —J (2)2x 1 O's w/ (2)2x 1 O's w/ 14' (3)jamb studs 28 (3)janib studs 14' 56' • • • • . . . . • • • Oil 0 0 aaaao > > m aCD 0 � � b C CD �_ �. CD ri co dOQ O�' `C Ot CD �'. N�'. H �'. O� N v HCD A O CD UQ �y — G. A7 n A7 C) ?� v cr O O n r aQ � � 0 oa o CD 0 CD ?r � ICn CD -- Cy CD cD ..• 0 p' t, = C O ID cD = C O c�D d Uq '—'UQ O Uq t p. p 8, i CD P CD CD $�C FCDs P O CD CD CD 0 ' W CD O `� r* `C 0 '.s ^ �•UQnr N O .� 9 Cr CD 0 BCD A 'CD `s C CDCD p 0 CD CD CD UOG CD O 0' Cr — �• W' Cn - W W CD a 00 O� O W x CD CD O CD CD �. � O New Garage for Todd Alguire DESIGN 9447 Stillwater Blvd. N new and remodeled home Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042 design and drafting services Gene Klatt Date: 7-27-19 ph:(612)986-2262 e-mail:klattgrl@gmail.com 56' 14' 28' 14' (2)2 8's (2)2 8's CD CD CD CD CD CD N ~ w 6 p.. I >E R' CD `-A 9' 19' 19' 9 CD ---�--------------- ----- ----------- --------------------��______====�1------------------------------------------- --- === L---------------------------------- ------------ €______====�C------- ----------- O O O r 00 N CAD o CD ^^ N P. P. CD J O Con O p� CD O O T O '3 v O r O N CD 0 CD O �V�yC`r,�•,�f� �h Q CD CD y� N � r b z 01 R CD ( CD t-ACD CD D 01 CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD 14' (2)2 8's 28' (2)2�8's 14' 56' F O 'r Cl� L/1 H w CD D CD CD W rCD � CD 0 CD CD ¢ � �• o ¢ td co oaf y CD p CD CD CD CD •D o U U, -tCD V Cr uq CD CDo O C CD `•D -t ° C Cs CD 11.n 0 b G CCn CD AD P- zr CD �. p ID UA c* ^ •UPq (ND O CD CD CD �• N O Oq CD VCD CD 0 CD '•S �' CD . It � CD �, a o � � C. t CL O y C CD W CD � n P. O U s CD CD O v .y N�71 Iew Garage N CD for Todd Alguire DESIGN 9447 Stillwater Blvd. N new and remodeled home Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042 design and drafting services Gene Klatt Date: 7-27-19 ph:(612)986-2262 e-mail:klattgrl@gmail.com l I� I II II II II - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - II III II II ❑ I � II II WW II j W � I I II II FM II II II 0 II II M I � II ❑ II II II II- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - m II ❑ y II � II II II FM - - - - - - - - - - - - y II y II z II °z II FM_1 - - - - - - - - - - - - - II III - - - - - - - - - - - - - II II II II II II II 1HIMM II II - - - - - - - - - - - - II ' II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II . . . . . . W � WN IF1 I II II II II II II II II II II II II II z II o I I LE o I x I x II II II > II z II z II II II II II II II II II II II II � II II � II II = II II II New Garage �71 W ° for Todd Alguire DESIGN 9447 Stillwater Blvd. N Ynelwand remodeled home Lake Elmo, Mn. 55042 sg and drafting services Gene Klatt Date' 7-27-19 ph:(612)986-2262 e-mail:klattgrl@gmail.com o TO H 5'-4" Typical Roof Construction: -asphalt shingles -151b felt underlayment ~ mount upper windows -"ice shield" at all roof edges �T� 4� f8" above roof -%" roof sheathing I—�--i b rA Cd -roof trusses @ 24" O.C. use spray foam insulation at truss heels F--1 r flash side to roof -1" air chute each truss space o P 'Cd truss clips each truss,each side-typical 12 wall on roof to be -by truss supplier 41 approximately%of the 0 N way back from front wall run exterior sheathing up to air chutego T O.H. 0'-8" 21'-4" 2 O.H. for insulation block � N AAAetal drip edge u Typical stair construction: Typical CeilingConstruction: 7"pre finished metal fascia over 2x6 • l%"particle board treads-1"nosing -blown insul.to R-49 sub fascia • lx_pine risers(owner option to use -6 mil poly V.B. hardwood risers and treads) -(1)layer%" gyp.bd. ceiling pre finished vented metal soffit 14 flash side to roof • (4)2x12 stringers see wall types for wall construction41 Typical Second Floor Construction: owner to provide 36"high continuous , ' %4" T&G plywood sub floor provide 2x4 blocking between -24" floor trusses @ 16" O.C. -verify handrail at one side of stairs %' rafters to nail sheathing „ x 1 layer 5 " e "x" fire rated G.B. at 4'O.H. 12-10 open ,%� -O y /g type attach 2x4 rafters to sides of floor M garage ceiling trusses with(2)8d nails at top plate \ 12 == 'i iii R-21 spray foam insulation and vapor and at all vert. and cross members q - - N barrier continuous through floor space hang 2x4 ceiling joists from 2x8 -typical ledger-ledger attached to wall w/ ,%' _� stair framing and floor „ 2x6 blocking for O.H. door %'' _ trusses at stair hung from spray foam around all windows, doors (1)1/4 x6 lag screw @ 16 O.C. (to _ �__ -3 sides and penetrations -� flush beam-verify beam studs)and nail rafters and joists to h %�' � �-- ,� 2x6 sub fascia y ==y ,' height needed see plan for all header ii lower level walls are 10 studs with(1) beam sizes bottom and(2)top plates pre finished metal fascia and non h %'' A @a vented soffit 2x6 treated sill plate w/%2"round x 16" o anchor bolts @ 36" O.C. on curb block h 03 2x4 blocking hold grade min. 6"below top of �-j foundation wall al N 4'landing 17 T @ 10"=15'40" O 4" conc. floor slab (w/optional 8" C.M.U. foundation wall w/6"x8" curb 2" (R-10)rigid insulation from footing W.W.M.)w/6 mil.poly vapor retarder block at top-void curb at all doors to top of foundation wall on outside rr p W over 6" gravel base-garage side floor -flash top of insul.to wall under siding slopes 4"to front wall(dashed) 20"x8" footing with(2)#4 rerods 1' 8" continuous 1 GARAGE SECTION A4 %4"=1'-011 a1 sheetA4 N N Q 29'-3%" 25'-07/a" w io 23'-10%" w a�a � oc 20'-10%g' CD To 10'-4%2"plate height 3 8'-1% late height 7�4'heel 6 B.C.=4' g 2'-0/a" a°P g a 8'- /2" 8'O.H.door 1'-6" O O xi a \\ o \ f \ emu n 20 R @ 7.46"=12'-5%a" 3'H.R. k 'I 8'typ.wndw.hgt. T typ.wndw.hgt. O 6" x For "?r Ilk' ;010� X 't. w _ �� •� ;s .,. '�z�z �. '- _—_ _ _ ——._�,�.� SIB o t� . - �" i !'r<+ r T;'l1y-T PO Cl 'fir _�/ �. •, -. .1\ '!, „ �• ,, t\ _ ,/ i � .. ��- 1 , r- Ali /l Nif ------------ ------------- ,y.. r � Ben Prchal From: WAYNE Goiffon <GOIFFONW@msn.com> Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 4:07 PM To: Ben Prchal Subject: Response to Ben Prchal Caution: This email originated outside our organization;please use caution. Hello Ben, I received a notice of a public hearing for Monday, August 26, 2019 concerning a variance request on behalf of Todd Alguire at 9447 Stillwater Blvd. N. I will not be able to attend the public hearing but I want to let you know that I do not have issue with Todd's request. Kind regards, Wayne Goiffon 9495 Stillwater Blvd. N. i THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO STAFF REPORT PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 08/26/2019 ITEM#: AGENDA ITEM: Approve Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual— APRIL 2019 Revisions SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer REVIEWED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator Ken Roberts, Planning Director Marty Powers, Public Works Director Chad Isakson, Assistant City Engineer ISSUE BEFORE THE COMMISSION: Staff respectfully requests that the Planning Commission review and recommend approval of the APRIL 2019 revisions to the Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual. BACKGROUND: The City maintains engineering design standards, standard specifications,and standard details for public infrastructure within the City, including streets, sanitary sewer, watermain, storm water facilities, right-of-way management and boulevard layout. This information is compiled into an Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual for use by staff and the development community. The latest version of the Manual is dated March 2017. The standards have been established to set minimum requirements to be met for all public infrastructure projects in the City with the intent of constructing consistent and compatible infrastructure systems throughout the community; to clearly communicate with the development community these minimum expectations and requirements;and to expedite plan design,preparation and City plan review and approvals. The engineering design standards and guidelines have been established to address the most common project elements and are to be used in conjunction with the requirements set forth by applicable codes, laws and ordinances,recognized industry standards, good engineering practice and specific project needs. Omission of reference in these standards and guidelines does not relieve responsibility for compliance with these requirements. In addition,the provisions of these standards and guidelines are not intended to prohibit the use of alternative systems, methods or components. Professional engineering judgement and ingenuity is encouraged to adapt to specific project needs. However, varying from the standards and guidelines will only be permitted with the approval of the City, after performing due diligence to ensure the design is equivalent or superior to the prescribed elements of the guideline. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: The Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual is a living document that is reviewed and modified from time to time by City staff to adapt pro-actively to changing conditions so as to remain current, address best practices and extract additional economic value and performance as needed. Changes are often based on recommendations from Engineering, Planning, Public Works,the construction observation staff or other City staff,the development community,and other stakeholders. Changes made by the City Engineer over time are periodically brought forward as revisions to the Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual to formalize the City's approval. ENGINEERING DESIGN STANDARDS for CITY OF LAKE ELMO STREET DESIGN AND GEOMETRICS • Minimum Street Widths, Measured from Face of Curb to Face of Curb (F-F) -Standard Local Residential Street (with parking allowed on both sides)............................32-feet F-F -Standard Local Residential Street, one-way lanes with center median........................19-feet F-F -Standard High Density Local Residential Street (with parking allowed on both sides).....36-feet F-F -Collector and Neighborhood Collector...................................Varies as Street Determined by City -Local Residential Street with parking on one side (when allowed by City)......................28-feet F-F -Local Residential Street with no parking on either side (when allowed by City).............22-feet F-F • Geometric Design, Local Residential Street MiRarnum Street Width (Q Q rl, Rg beth sides................................................................... e e t -Piv�ivv,i ffl Street Width I 1 p iR11 .,Y,., .-�.J en al'ewe „ � y) 7 feet ���„�„�=���Ta�,-rR R�a�-ler,-s��Ta -a-rl Pwe d��-CTt ............................. 4�� -MiRffi ffl-Li n Street Width (B B)Ti ne�arkT5 C'°P' (when by ewed City) .....................................22 feet �C �^ Ta StreetFd+h, ene way IaRes with eenteF median................................................1feet -Center Crown....................................................................................................................................2.5% -Minimum Longitudinal Grade......................................................................................................0.5% -Maximum Longitudinal Grade...........................................................................................................8% -Maximum Intersection Approach Grade, First 50-feet from curb line.....................................2.5% -Minimum Vertical Curve Length, Crest (including stop conditions).........................................K=19 -Minimum Vertical Curve Length, Sag (including stop conditions)............................................K=37 -Minimum Horizontal Curve Radius..........................................................................................90-feet -Intersection Angles...............................................................................................................90 degrees -Tangent Length at Intersection from Curb Line, Local Streets..............................................50 feet -Tangent Length at Intersection from Curb Line, Higher Class Streets.............................100 feet Ta„geRt Minimum betweeTEurves..........................................................................................5ATeet -Minimum Intersecting Street Offset, from Centerlines................................................125459-feet -Curb Radius, Minimum Local to Local......................................................................................20-feet -Curb Radius, Minimum Local to Collector...............................................................................25-feet -Minimum Diameter of Cul-de-sac.............................................................................................90-feet -Minimum Grade around Cul-de-sac................................................................................1.0%97-5% -Maximum Cul-de-sac Street Length (lots less than 2.5 acres)...........................................600-feet -Maximum Cul-de-sac Street Length (lots equal or greater than 2.5 acres)...................1,320-feet -Temporary Cul-de-sac at plat line..........................................................................................Required • Geometric Design, Collector Street -Design Standards......................................................Meeting State-Aid for minimum design speed -WAMM.-M StFeet Width, hAr-k Af r—rh te baek ef curb................ ...VaFies (as determined by City) -Maximum Longitudinal Grade...........................................................................................................6% -Intersection Angles...............................................................................................................90 degrees -Tangent Length at Intersection from Curb Line..................................................................100 feet -Tangent Minimum between curves..........................................................................................50 feet CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 1 of 9 -Minimum Vertical Curve Length, Sag and Crest..................State-Aid for minimum design speed -Minimum Horizontal Curve Radius........................................State-Aid for minimum design speed -Minimum Intersecting Street Offset, if allowed, from Centerlines...................................250-feet -Street/Roadway Access......................................Per City Access Management Spacing Guidelines -Driveway Access, Residential...............................................................................................Prohibited -Driveway Access, Commercial...........................Per City Access Management Spacing Guidelines -Curb Radius..................................................................................................................................25-feet • Pavement Section Design (Pavement sections below are minimum allowed. Additional pavement section may be required based on Geotechnical Report of the subgrode soils). -Local Residential Street..................................................................................Minimum 7-Ton Design -Subbase, Select Granular Borrow (SPEC 3149.213)............................................Minimum 12-inches -Subsurface Drainage System...................................................................................................Required -Base, Aggregate Base, Cl. 6 100% Crushed Stone Aggregate (SPEC 3138)......Minimum 6-inches ■ Note: Class 6 Recycled Material Substitute by City Engineer Approval -Non-Wearing Course, MnDOT 2360 Type SP 12.5, Mixture 2B, Asphalt Grade C..........2-inches -Wearing Course, MnDOT 2360 Type SP 9.5, Mixture 2B, Asphalt Grade C....................1%-inches -Collector Street and Above..........................................................................Minimum 10-Ton Design -Subbase, Select Granular Borrow (SPEC 3149.213)......................................Minimum 243-2--inches -Subsurface Drainage System...................................................................................................Required -Base, Aggregate Base, Cl. 6 100% Crushed Stone Aggregate............................Minimum 8-inches ■ Note: Class 6 Recycled Material Substitute by City Engineer Approval -Non-Wearing Course, MnDOT 2360 Type SP 12.5, Mixture 3C..........................................2-inches -Wearing Course, MnDOT 2360 Type SP 9.5, Mixture 3C.....................................................2-inches • Draintile/Street Subsurface Drainage -Type..........................................................................................................Sch. 40 Rigid PVC Perforated -Size...................................................................................................................................................4-inch -Sock............................................................................................................................MnDOT SPEC 3733 -Location......All Low Points in both directions; at 350 foot intervals, and Project Specific Design -Length.................................Minimum 100-foot runs; 100 feet in both directions from low points -Clean Outs....................................................................................Every 150 feet and at all dead ends • Curb and Gutter -Material, All Purposes..............................................................................................................Concrete -Strength, Minimum Requirements............................................................................4,500 3—,900 PSI -Type: New Developments, Single Family Residential.................................................Surmountable -Type: Multifamily, Commercial, Collector Roads, Medians, Reconstruction..........................B618 • Utility Conduit -Type..............................................................................................................................PVC Schedule 40 -Location/Depth.................Perpendicular to Street and minimum 1-foot below Street Subgrade • Entrances/Driveways -Maximum Driveway Width at Right-of-way...............................................Varies by Zoning District -Bituminous Driveway Minimum Thickness, Section.....................................................Match Street -Residential Concrete Driveway Minimum Thickness............................................................6-inches -Commercial Concrete Driveway Minimum Thickness..........................................................8-inches CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 2 of 9 • Signing -Design Standards.....................................................................................................................MMUTCD -Sheathing Type.....................................................................................Type IX Diamond Grade (DG3) -Sign Posts.........................................................................................Pre-punched 14 ga. Square Tube RIGHT-OF-WAY AND BOULEVARD LAYOUT • Minimum Right-of-way Widths -Principal Arterial....................................................................................................150 feet to 300 feet -Intermediate Arterial............................................................................................100 feet to 300 feet -Minor Arterial........................................................................................................120 feet to 150 feet -Collector Street......................................................................................................100 feet to 150 feet -Commercial or Industrial Service Street...................................................................................80 feet -Standard High Density Local Residential Street (36 feet with parking on both sides)............70-feet -Standard Local Residential Street (32 feet with parking on both sides)...................................66-feet -Local Residential Street with parking on one side (when allowed by City).............................60-feet -Local Residential Street with no parking on either side (when allowed by City)...................60-feet -Marginal Access Street (with no trail or sidewalk)......................................................................50 feet -Cul-de-Sac................................................................................60 feet; turn-around radius of 60 feet • Right of Way Widths -I_eEaI Res+derat+-Pi,I Street M;Ri.M.II.M. In1;,1t.h................................................................................6- fee-t Eu, de sacs.......................................................................................................................6n-feA+ r.aP-1 Collector Street Mi \.Vid+h.....................................................Varies (a det�e,F lIned by City) • Boulevard, Local Residential Street -Width..........................................................................................15.5 4-6-feet (15-feet at cul-de-sacs) -Slope, Typical and Maximum..............................................................................................4% and 4:1 -Topsoil Minimum...........................................................................................................................6-inch -Turf Treatment.........................................................................................................................Lawn Sod -Tree Location without Sidewalk or Trail............................................................8-feet back of curb -Tree Location with Sidewalk or Trail.....................................................................5-feet back of curb -Street Light Location................................................................................................5-feet back of curb -Street Light Fixture......................................Traditional Colonial LED, Type B 4000 Lumens (Black) -Street Light Pole........................................................15-foot Washington Fluted Aluminum (Black) Street Light Type/„i .................................115, feet C-2i Acorn w/AIyFniRUFn Pole (All Blado -Hydrant Location......................................................................................................5-feet back of curb • Sidewalks -Collector Street................................................................................................Required on both sides -Local Residential Street......................................................................................Required on one side -Cul-de-sac Street....................................................................................Required for trail connection -Width...............................................................................................................................................6-feet -Sidewalk Maximum Longitudinal Grade...........................................................................................6 -Pavement Section................................................................5-inch Concrete; 4-inch Select Granular • Trails CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 3 of 9 -Locations.........................................................................................Per City trail plan and as directed -Width, Local Trail...........................................................................................................................8-feet -Pavement Section, Local Trail................................2.25-inch Bituminous; 8-inch minimum Class 5 -Maximum Longitudinal Grade...........................................................................................................8 • Berm Construction in Boulevard -Maximum Side Slope with Maintenance Requirements...............................................................3:1 -Maximum Side Slope with Natural Vegetation..........................................................................2:1 CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 4 of 9 SANITARY SEWER • Force Main -Material...............................................................................................................................PVC or HDPE -PVC, 2-inch-24-inch............................................................................................................. C900/C905 -HDPE Class, 1-inch..........................................................................................................................SDR 9 -HDPE Class, 2-inch-24-inch........................................................................................................SDR 11 -Minimum Cover..........................................................................................................................7.5-Feet -Location of main in Street............................................................................................Project Specific -Tracer Wire.......................................................................12 AWG solid, PRO-TRACE HDD-CCS PE45 -Air Relief Valve and Manhole Locations.......................................................................All High Points -Clean Outs.........................................................................................................................All Low Points • Gravity main -Material...............................................................................................................................................PVC -Minimum Diameter.......................................................................................................................8-inch -Class, up to 20-feet in depth.......................................................................................................SDR 35 -Class, 20-25 feet in depth............................................................................................................SDR 26 -Class and Material, over 25 feet in depth..................................................................Project Specific -Minimum cover over pipe.........................................................................................................5.5-feet -Maximum depth of pipe.............................................................................................................30-feet -Slope......................................................................................................................Ten States Standards -Tracer Wire...........................................................................12 AWG solid, PRO-TRACE HF-CCS PE45 -Location of main in Street.....................................................................................................Centerline • Sanitary Sewer Manholes -Type..............................................................................................................................Precast Concrete -Maximum inlet/outlet elevation difference..............................................................................2-feet -Minimum depth of Manhole........................................................................................................6-feet -Type of Casting..........................................................................................................................R-1642-B -Joints and Assembly......................................................................................................Per City Details -Location........................................................................................................................Street Centerline -Maximum Spacing.....................................................................................................................400-feet -Flow Line Match Required................................................................................................8/10ths Rule -Drop Across All Manholes Required.........................................................................................0.1-feet -Connections to Existing Manholes.......................................................................Core Drill with Boot -Outside drop minimum.................................................................................................................2-feet -Outside drop Material.........................................................................................................Ductile Iron • Service Pipe -Material and Class....................................................................................................PVC SCHEDULE 40 -Minimum Diameter.......................................................................................................................4-inch -Tracer Wire...........................................................................12 AWG solid, PRO-TRACE HF-CCS PE45 -Drive-In Magnesium Grounding Anode Rod.......................Copperhead Part#ANO-1005 (1.51b) • Easements -Sanitary sewer pipe and structures require minimum 30-foot easements centered over the pipe/structure if not located within the public right-of-way. Additional easement width may be required as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Easements must be dedicated to the City and be provided in the City's standard form of easement agreement. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 5 of 9 WATERMAIN • Water Service Pressures -Individual Booster Pumps required..................................................................development specific • Main Pipe -Material................................................................................................................................................DIP -Class.................................................................................................................................................CL. 52 -Minimum Diameter— Mainline...................................................................................................8-inch -Minimum Diameter—As allowed by City Engineer..................................................................6-inch -Minimum Diameter— Hydrant Lead...........................................................................................6-inch -Minimum Cover...........................................................................................................................7%-feet -Maximum Length of Dead Ends.........................................................................................1,000-feet -Air Release measures........................................................................................................MH, Hydrant -Tracer Wire...........................................................................12 AWG solid, PRO-TRACE HF-CCS PE45 -Location of main in Street..............................................................................................North or West • Hydrants -Type...................................................................................................................Waterous Pacer WB-67 -Depth of Bury...............................................................................................................................8%-feet -Maximum Coverage Radius, Residential................................................................................500-feet -Maximum Coverage Radius, Commercial..............................................................................300-feet -Gate valve on Hydrant leads.............................................................................................................Yes -Hydrant Nozzle....................................................................4-inch Storz with Pentagon Nut end cap -Temporary dead end lines....................................................Hydrant required (no air bleed valves) • Valves -Resilient Seat Gate Valve, for 12-inch pipe & smaller...........American Flow Control 2500 Series -Butterfly Valve, for pipe over 12-inch..................................................................Mueller Lineseal III -Valve Box.................................................................................................................Tyler G-Box6860 -Maximum area isolated by valving.....................................................................................20 services -Maximum distance between valves on Trunk Mains...........................................................800-feet • Service Pipe -Service Material...........................................................................................................Type „V copper -Corporation Stop..............................................................................................A.Y. McDonald 74701B -Curb Stop ............................................................................................................A.Y. McDonald 76104 -Curb Box ..............................................................................A.Y. McDonald 5614 w/rod & Mpls. top • Easements -Watermain lines and hydrants require minimum 30-foot easements centered over the pipe if not located within the public right-of-way. Additional easement width may be required as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Easements must be dedicated to the City and be provided in the City's standard form of easement agreement. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 6 of 9 STORM SEWER • Design -Design Frequency for Storm Sewer..........................................................................................10-year -Minimum storm sewer design velocity.........................................................................................3-fps -Maximum storm sewer design velocity......................................................................................15-fps -Maximum storm sewer outlet velocity.........................................................................................5-fps -Minimum Outfall Pipe Slope....................Verify positive grade at completion (no reverse grade) • Main Pipe -Storm Sewer Pipe Material..............................................................................................................RCP -Minimum Cover Depth..................................................................................................................3-feet -Minimum Pipe Diameter, Main.................................................................................................15-inch -Minimum Catch Basin Lead........................................................................................................12-inch -Location of main in Street................................................................................................South or East • Culvert pipe -Culvert Material, urban road or crossing public road..................................................................RCP -Culvert Material, rural road private driveway.............................................................................CMP -Minimum Culvert Size.................................................................................................................15-inch -Apron and Trash Guard Required....................................................................................................Yes • Manholes -Type..............................................................................................................................Precast Concrete -Sump Depth and Location...................................4-feet, located at street prior to discharge point -Minimum Structure Depth...........................................................................................................4-feet -Casting.......................................................................................................................................R-1642-B -Minimum Adjustment Rings.................................................................................................................2 -Maximum Adjustment Rings........................................................................................................1-foot • Catch Basins -Type..............................................................................................................................Precast Concrete -Minimum Structure Depth...........................................................................................................4-feet -Maximum run to Catch Basin...................................................................................................350-feet -Casting, Curb & Gutter, B Style Curb.......................................................................................R-3067V -Casting, Area Drain.......................................................................................................................R-4342 • Easements -Storm sewer pipe, structures and flared end sections require minimum 30-foot easements centered over the pipe/structure if not located within the public right-of-way. Additional easement width may be required as determined by the City Engineer and Public Works Director. Easements must be dedicated to the City and be provided in the City's standard form of easement agreement. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 7 of 9 STORMWATER MANAGEMENT AND STORMWATER BMPs Note: Storm water facilities shall be in accordance with the requirements listed herein; in accordance with the requirements of the applicable watershed district; and in accordance with the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency NPDES Construction Storm Water Permit. In addition, all "Recommended"and "Highly Recommended" provisions of the Minnesota Stormwater Manual should be considered requirements by the City of Lake Elmo unless specifically approved otherwise by the City Engineer. • Site Design -Facility locations............................................................................Located in Outlots deeded to City -Location and Size.................................................................................................above 100-year HWL -Building Lowest Floor above 100-year HWL...............................................................................2-feet -Building Lowest Opening above EOF...........................................................................................1-foot -Minimum access road width (located in Outlot).....................................................................20-feet -Maximum grade for maintenance access roads...........................................................................10% -Setback from building foundations...........................................................................................35-feet -Flood Protection......................Overland Emergency Overflows Required (No landlocked basins) • Stormwater Ponds (Detention Basins) -Design Frequency (DF)..................................2, 10, and 100-year, and 100-year 10-day snowmelt -Minimum Basin Depth to HWL.....................................................................................................3-feet -Maximum Pond Depth to HWL..................................................................................................10-feet -Average Permanent Pool Depth..............................................................................4-feet to 6-feet -Permanent Pool Length-to-Width Ratio.......................................................................3:1 or greater -Maintenance Bench Maximum side slope, first ten feet above Permanent Pool...................10:1 -Aquatic Bench Maximum side slope, first ten feet into Permanent Pool................................10:1 -Maximum side slope, beyond first ten feet....................................................................................3:1 -Pretreatment Sediment Forebay................................................................................10% Pond Area -Required freeboard..................................................................................................2-feet above HWL -Pond Liner....................................................................................Clay lined per VBWD specifications • Drainage Swales -Maximum side slopes on Swales (maximum slopes allowed only when necessary)................3:1 -Maximum side slopes on Right-of-Way Swales..............................................................................4:1 -Minimum longitudinal Swale grade.................................................................................................2% -Minimum Swale depth within Right-of-Way.......................................................................18-inches -Minimum Bottom Width...............................................................................................................4-feet • Infiltration Facilities (Bioretention Areas and Rain Gardens) -Inlet control from Streets................Use Neenah R-3067-V casting on Catch Basin (no curb cuts) -Maintenance Agreement for public right-of-way................................................................Required -Maintenance Access Easement..............................................................................................Required -Minimum distance from septic system or drainfield..............................................................35-feet -Minimum distance from public or private well.......................................................................50-feet -Maximum Site Slope...........................................................................................................................5% -Minimum depth to Bedrock.........................................................................................................5-feet -Minimum depth to Seasonally High Water Table.....................................................................5-feet -Located in "hotspot" drainage shed (i.e. gas stations).....................................................Prohibited -Located in Hydrologic Soil Group D Soils............................................................................Prohibited -Underdrain, Group C Soils (filtration)....................................................................................Required CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 8 of 9 -Soil infiltration rates.................................................................*By Field Testing at Facility Location -Maximum side slope..........................................................................................................................4:1 -Maximum drain dry time.........................................................................................................48 hours -Soil medium..........................................................................MnDOT 3877 E Rooting Topsoil Borrow -Seeding......................................................................MnDOT 3876 Specifications with Type 33-261 -Plantings.............................................Planted in conformance with City approved landscape plan * Soil borings are required to verify infiltration rates. Borings must be taken to a depth of 5 feet below proposed infiltration basin elevation. ■ Minimum 2 borings per facility up to 5,000 SF. of infiltration area. ■ Minimum 3 borings per facility up to 10,000 SF. of infiltration area. ■ Additional boring required for every additional Z500 SF. of infiltration area. • Other Stormwater BMPs: The City of Lake Elmo has adopted the following additional BMPs and Low Impact Development practices for the City and promotes their use in accordance with these Engineering Design Standards and the applicable City Code. ■ Open Space Developments in applicable Zoning Districts. ■ Narrow Streets through minimized street width standards. ■ Stormwater Reuse. ■ Infiltration/filtration Practices. ■ Vegetated Swales (Ribbon Curbs and Curbless Streets in applicable Zoning Districts). ■ Temporary Erosion and Sedimentation Control using Engineering Standards Manual. ■ Stormwater Site Design. -Conservation of open spaces to protect a site's natural areas. -Impervious lot coverage credits for Stormwater BMPs. -Use of Pervious Pavements. -Adoption of Minimal Impact Design Standards (MIDS) to mimic predevelopment hydrology. -Incorporation of Landscaping and use of Native Vegetation. DETAIL PLATE NUMBERS AND PLAN NOTES • Pipe Installation 101,103,105 • Watermain 200A,201,203,204,206,207A,207B,208,210,211 • Sanitary Sewer 300A,301,302,303,305,306,311,313,314,315 • Storm Sewer 400A,402,404,405,406,407,408,409,410,411, 412,416,417,419,420,421 Pavements, Curbs, Walks 500A,501,502,504,505,506,507A,507B,507C, 507D,507E,507F,508,509,510,511,512,513,44:4 • Erosion Control 600A,600B,600C,600D,601,603,604,605,606 • Typical Sections and Right-of-Way 801,804,805,806,807A,807B • Signing/Pavement Markings/Lighting 900A,901,902,903 NOTE: Minimum and maximum design parameters identify the end range of the acceptable design in the as- built condition and therefore must account for construction tolerances. Minimum and maximum design parameters are intended for use in the unique and extreme circumstance and therefore should have limited use in the base design. CITY OF LAKE ELMO,MN I DESIGN STANDARDS MANUAL REVISION DATE:APRIL 2019 PAGE 9 of 9 The Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual dated APRIL 2019 includes the following revisions and updates: 1. Revised minimum street widths as detailed in the attached Engineering Design Standard red lines. Street width revisions were made per Council direction following the June 11, 2019 workshop. 2. Reconciled minor street geometric parameters. o Removed tangent requirement between curves along local streets. o Reduced the minimum intersection offset distance from 150 feet to 125 feet. o Increased the minimum gutter grade in cul-de-sacs from 0.5%to 1.0%. 3. Revised the bituminous wear course mix to require a higher-grade oil in the mix (Asphalt Grade C) and eliminated the practice of"saw and seal"on local streets. 4. Increased the minimum pavement section for collector streets to require 24-inches of select granular borrow. 5. Revised the concrete strength requirements from 3,900 PSI to 4,500 PSI, consistent with the new MnDOT and industry standards. 6. Revised the minimum right-of-way widths and minimum boulevards to be consistent with the approved 2040 Comprehensive Plan,Transportation Chapter and to accommodate the wider streets. 7. Revised the City standard street light fixture and pole to reflect the City's recent change to LED lighting. 8. Added minimum utility easement width requirements for watermain, sanitary sewer and storm sewer to be consistent with existing practices. 9. Removed the requirement to have storm water facility Outlots dedicated to City ownership. The new practice will be to require drainage and utility easements over the entire Outlot. 10. Revised the Standard Detail Plates for pedestrian ramps to be consistent with the new MnDOT and ADA standards. 11. Updated the Specifications and Details to reflect MnDOT 2018 Specification updates (updated from MnDOT 2014). 12. Updated the specifications to require storm sewer televising, similar to sanitary sewer televising. 13. Reviewed and red lined the City Subdivision Ordinance, Open Space Ordinance,and Stormwater Management Ordinance design standards to be consistent with the Engineering Design Standards Manual. FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact at this time. Should the City council adopt wider street widths, the future infrastructure street and storm water construction,reconstruction and ongoing maintenance costs will increase accordingly. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the APRIL 2019 revisions to the Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual. The recommended motion for the action is as follows: "Move to recommend approval of the APRIL 2019 revisions to the Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual dated APRIL 2019. *The full Engineering Design and Construction Standards Manual, dated APRIL 2019 is available for review at City Hall. Sewered Development Development Status Sheet Final Plat Appro DA Agreement DA Agreement Plat Recorded Updated 8/19/19 Approved Signed Total# Total#of Total#of Building CO's Southern Developments Developer Builder Of Homes SF Homes Townhomes Permits Issued Issued Zoning Build-Out SAVONA-310 Total Savona 1st 2/18/2014 5/20/2014 6/18/2014 9/25/2014 Lennar Lennar 44 44 0 44 44 LDR 100% Savona 2nd 9/16/2014 9/16/2014 10/22/2014 4/14/2015 Lennar Lennar 67 45 22 62 61 LDR/MDR 91% Savona 3rd 9/15/2015 9/15/2016 9/16/2015 11/19/2015 Lennar Lennar 120 21 99 119 116 LDR/MDR 97% Savona 4th 3/15/2016 4/5/2016 6/27/2016 7/27/2016 Lennar Lennar 78 78 0 31 23 LDR 29% 309 188 121 256 244 79% BOULDER PONDS-162 Total Boulder Ponds 1st 4/21/2015 4/21/2015 5/16/2015 6/5/2015 OP 4 Boulder Ponds Creative Homes 47 47 0 43 39 PUD/LDR 83% Boulder Ponds 2nd 5/17/2016 5/17/2016 4/12/2017 5/8/2017 OP 4 Boulder Ponds Creative Homes 18 18 0 17 15 PUD/LDR 83% Boulder Ponds 3rd 6/19/2018 8/8/2018 8/31/2018 10/18/2018 OP 4 Boulder Ponds Creative Homes 33 33 0 12 2 6% 98 98 0 72 56 57% THE SPRINGS AT LAKE ELMO-300 Total The Spring at Lake Elmo 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 UNION STATION-240 Total Union Station 1st 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 HUNTER'S CROSSING-51 Total Hunter's Crossing 1st 7/1/2014 10/7/2014 10/15/2015 12/18/2014 Ryland/Cal Atlantic Cal Atlantic 22 22 0 22 22 LDR 100% Hunter's Crossing 2nd 5/5/2015 5/5/2015 5/29/2015 8/4/2015 Ryland/Cal Atlantic Cal Atlantic 29 29 0 29 29 LDR 100% 51 51 0 51 51 100% INWOOD-537 Total Inwood 1st 5/19/2015 5/19/2015 6/9/2015 8/3/2015 Hans Hagen/MI Homes MI Homes 40 40 0 39 39 PUD/LDR 98% Inwood 2nd 9/1/2015 N/A 11/19/2015 11/23/2015 Hans Hagen/MI Homes MI Homes 21 21 0 21 21 PUD/LDR 100% Inwood 3rd 4/19/2016 5/3/2016 5/16/2016 5/23/2016 Hans Hagen/MI Homes MI Homes 68 68 0 68 68 PUD/LDR 100% Inwood 4th 10/18/2016 2/7/2017 4/5/2017 3/27/2017 Hans Hagen/MI Homes MI Homes 38 38 0 30 26 PUD/LDR 68% Inwood 5th 4/4/2017 6/6/2017 6/15/2017 6/19/2017 Hans Hagen/MI Homes MI Homes 101 101 0 78 73 PUD/LDR 72% 268 268 0 236 227 85% HAMMES ESTATES(Lake Ridge Crossing-163 Total Hammes Estates 1st 10/7/2014 8/16/2016 8/16/2016 9/27/2016 Rachael Development Multiple 57 57 0 43 39 LDR 68% Hammes Estates 2nd 1/3/2017 2/7/2017 6/9/2017 6/30/2017 Rachael Development Multiple 37 37 0 13 11 LDR 30% Hammes Estates 3rd 2/20/2018 3/20/2018 3/21/2018 5/2/2018 Rachael Development Multiple 69 69 0 1 0 LDR 0% 163 163 0 57 50 31% ROYAL GOLF-292 Total Royal Golf-1st 9/5/2017 9/19/2017 9/19/2017 9/29/2017 HC Royal Golf Multiple 73 73 0 51 48 GCC 66% Royal Golf-2nd 6/19/2018 6/19/2018 6/19/2018 8/2/2018 HC Royal Golf Multiple 64 64 0 7 1 GCC 2% Royal Golf-3rd 12/4/2018 Extension granted to 2020 HC Royal Golf Multiple 67 67 0 0 0 GCC 0% 204 204 0 58 49 24% SOUTHWIND AT LAKE ELMO-46 Total Southwind 7/5/2017 7/5/2017 7/17/2017 8/21/2017 Southwind Builder Southwind Builders 46 46 0 18 11 MDR 24% 46 46 0 18 11 24% NORTHPORT-104 Total Northport 1st 9/5/2017 9/19/2017 11/15/2017 11/15/2017 Pulte Homes Pulte Homes 36 36 0 20 16 LDR 44% Northport 2nd 7/17/2018 7/17/2018 8/21/2018 8/14/2018 Pulte Homes Pulte Homes 29 29 0 3 0 0% 65 65 0 23 16 25% WYNDHAM VILLAGE-10 Total 12/4/2018 10 10 0 0 0 0% 10 10 0 0 0 0% Northern Developments EASTON VILLAGE-217 Total Easton Village 1st 3/3/2015 3/3/2015 7/23/2015 8/10/2015 Chase Development Multiple 71 71 0 68 66 LDR 93% Easton Village 2nd 5/2/2017 6/6/2017 6/6/2017 7/5/2017 Chase Development Multiple 19 19 0 18 13 LDR 68% Easton Village 3rd 7/18/2017 7/18/2017 7/6/2017 9/5/2017 Chase Development Multiple 28 28 0 19 16 LDR 57% Easton Village 4th 5/15/2018 5/15/2018 9/10/2018 9/19/2018 Chase Development Multiple 25 25 0 11 0 LDR 0% 143 143 0 116 95 66% LEGACY AT NORTH STAR-266 Total Legacy at North Star 1st 8/21/2018 8/21/2018 9/14/2018 9/14/2018 Gonyea Homes Multiple 59 59 0 27 7 VLDR 12% Pool/Pool House 59 59 0 27 7 12% VILLAGE PRESERVE-91 Total Village Preserve 1st 5/5/2015 6/2/2015 8/3/2015 8/25/2015 Gonyea Homes Multiple 46 46 0 44 44 LDR 96% Village Preserve 2nd 4/19/2016 8/16/2016 8/19/2016 9/9/2016 Gonyea Homes Multiple 45 45 0 43 38 LDR 84% 91 91 0 87 82 90% WILDFLOWER-145 Total Wildflower @ Lake Elmo 1st 7/21/2015 8/4/2015 8/27/2015 10/6/2015 Engstrom Companies Multiple 60 60 0 42 38 PUD/MDR 63% Wildflower @ Lake Elmo 2nd 12/6/2016 3/21/2017 6/20/2017 6/20/2017 Engstrom Companies Multiple 20 20 0 8 6 PUD/MDR 30% Wildflower @ Lake Elmo 3rd 3/20/2018 4/17/2018 7/26/2018 8/7/2018 Engstrom Companies Multiple 25 25 0 1 0 PUD/MDR 0% 105 105 0 51 44 42% Cummulative Totals 1612 1491 121 1052 932 58% Non-Sewered Development Development Status Sheet LEGENDS-40 Total Legends 0 0 0 0 0 0 HIDDEN MEADOWS-26 Total Hidden Meadows Creative Homes 0 0 0 0 1 0 Note: Building Permits are updated at the end of each month. CO's are updated as issued. Items in red are waiting on information from Planning