HomeMy WebLinkAbout#05 - Plans for 180 acres on Ideal AveSTAFF REPORT
DATE: July 9, 2019
DISCUSSION
AGENDA ITEM: 180 acres of City Property on Ideal Ave
SUBMITTED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator
BACKGROUND:
The City recently acquired about 180 acres along Ideal Ave around the public works facility and south of
CSAH 14 in its settlement with 3M. The land is currently being farmed under a lease that expires in
December. The current zoning on the property is Rural Residential. In the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, the
8 acre parcel (northwest corner) is guided for Rural Single Family and the remaining 172 acres is guided
for Rural Area Development. Water would be available to the property but the property is outside of the
city’s municipal sewer service area.
ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL:
What would the Council like to see happen with the 180 acres?
PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS:
Staff had initially approached 3M asking for 30 acres for some ballfields and a dog park. Now that the city
has received much more land other uses could be considered. The new city hall could be relocated to the
site. This would allow for the Brookfield building to be sold or developed where there are more options
due to the availability of sewer. The fire station could be relocated to city hall as was reviewed in the BKV
study, in order to keep a centralized location. This also eliminates the need for staff to find temporary office
locations while a new facility is being built/remodeled.
Alternatively, the City could look to sell the 180 acres or continue to lease it out for agricultural uses. By
leasing the land out, it remains on the tax roll. The current lease does not cover all of the taxes.
Furthermore, there is a one year lag in taxing from use. So even if the land was not leased out in 2020, the
city would still have to pay taxes for the year since the taxability was determined as of the use the previous
January 2nd.
The council may wish to discuss whether or not a planning consultant should be engaged to help the city
walk through options and evaluate the best use of the land.
FISCAL IMPACT:
2019 taxes are $24,564. The annual lease is for $20,020.
ATTACHMENT:
• Map
• Phase 1 Report
4300 MarketPointe Drive, Suite 200
Minneapolis, MN 55435
952.832.2600
www.barr.com
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PIN #1602921240002
Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Prepared for
3M
May 2019
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page i
\\barr.com\projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase
Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\PHIESA_Report_1602921240002_v2.docx
Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
PIN #1602921240002
Lake Elmo, Minnesota
May 2019
Contents
1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.1 Purpose ............................................................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Scope of Services ............................................................................................................................................................ 1
1.3 Significant Assumptions ............................................................................................................................................... 2
1.4 Limitations, Exceptions, and Data Gaps ................................................................................................................. 2
1.5 Special Terms and Conditions ................................................................................................................................... 3
1.6 User Reliance .................................................................................................................................................................... 3
2.0 Site Description .................................................................................................................................................................... 4
2.1 Location and Legal Description ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.2 Property Setting and Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 4
2.3 User-Provided Information ......................................................................................................................................... 4
3.0 Findings and Opinions ....................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.1 Definitions .......................................................................................................................................................................... 5
3.2 Findings and Opinions .................................................................................................................................................. 6
4.0 Conclusions ............................................................................................................................................................................ 8
4.1 Deviations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.0 References .............................................................................................................................................................................. 9
6.0 Signature and Qualifications of Environmental Professional ...........................................................................11
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page ii
List of Tables
Table 1 Property and Adjoining Property Regulatory Status
Table 2 Surrounding Area Regulatory Status
List of Figures
Figure 1 Property Location Map
Figure 2 Property Layout Map
List of Appendices
Appendix A Phase I Documentation
Appendix B Property Inspection Photographs
Appendix C Historical Documentation
Appendix D Regulatory Records Documentation
Appendix E Previous Investigations of Property
Appendix F Interview Documentation
Appendix G Qualifications
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 1
1.0 Introduction
Barr Engineering Co. (Barr) was retained by 3M to complete a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
(Assessment) of a property owned by 3M and used for agriculture. The property is located in the W ½,
Section 16, T29N, R21W, near Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota (Property). The Property consists
of PIN #1602921240002. The Property location is shown on Figure 1.
This report summarizes the findings, opinions, and conclusions of the Assessment. Detailed descriptions
of the Property setting, utility information, land-use history, regulatory history, and current Property
conditions and features are presented in the Phase I documentation in Appendix A. Informational
resources are described in Section 5 of this report and are assigned unique reference numbers, which are
used throughout the report and Appendix A.
Barr has performed this Assessment in conformance with ASTM, International (ASTM) Practice E 1527-13
(Practice). No intentional deviations from the Practice were made in performing this Assessment except as
described in Section 1.4. In following the Practice, this Assessment also complies with the U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency 40 CFR Part 312 Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries;
Final Rule.
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of the Assessment is to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection
with the Property as defined by the Practice and discussed in the findings and opinions section of the
report, and to assess the property for 3M Real Estate.
1.2 Scope of Services
The Assessment involved completion of the following five components described in Section 7 of the
Practice: records review, site reconnaissance, interviews, reporting, and file reviews. The following tasks
were completed during the Assessment. The details of each task are described below and in Appendix A.
Records Review
• A Regulatory Database Report was obtained and federal, state, and readily available tribal records
databases were reviewed.
• USGS topographic maps were reviewed and used to determine physical setting information.
• Land title information provided by the User was reviewed.
• Discretionary physical setting sources including Minnesota Department of Health well and boring
records for wells in the Property vicinity and published geological reports were reviewed and used
to determine physical setting information.
• Historical aerial photographs; historical topographic maps; reverse city directories; and zoning
and tax assessor’s records were reviewed for the Property and surrounding land.
• A fire insurance map search was conducted and no fire insurance maps were available for the
Property.
• One previous Phase I ESA relevant to a portion of the Property was reviewed.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 2
• The Minnesota Pollution Control Agency’s (MPCA) What’s in My Neighborhood (WIMN) and
Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) Cleanups in My Community were reviewed to
supplement regulatory data.
Site Reconnaissance
• A visual inspection was conducted of the building interiors and exterior features on the Property.
Current conditions with respect to land use; chemical and waste storage, use, and disposal; facility
operations and equipment; utilities; and evidence of potential releases of petroleum products or
hazardous substances were documented, if observed. Evidence of historical uses or conditions, if
encountered, was also documented. Current land-use and occupants of neighboring properties
were documented during the site visit.
Interviews
• Interviews were conducted with the Property representative and the City of Lake Elmo public
works department.
Evaluation and Report Preparation
• This report was prepared to document the resources used during completion of the Assessment
and to describe the findings, opinions, and conclusions of the Assessment.
File Review
• The Property was not identified on any of the standard environmental record sources, so a file
review for the Property was not conducted.
• Adjoining properties were identified on multiple standard environmental record sources. A file
review for one adjoining property was conducted.
1.3 Significant Assumptions
No significant assumptions were made to complete the Assessment.
1.4 Limitations, Exceptions, and Data Gaps
The following limitations and exceptions are associated with this Assessment:
• Gaps of greater than five years in historical documentation are present, and are summarized in
the following table.
Date Range Property Changes
Prior to 1936 Historical documentation was not readily ascertainable; therefore, changes in general Property land-uses are unknown.
1936-1946, 1953-1964, 1966-1974, 1978-1984, 1997-2006
Gaps greater than five years in historical documentation are present; however, general Property land-uses did not change during the time periods.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 3
• Representative portions of the Property were observed by driving and by foot during the site visit,
and some portions of the property were not directly visited beyond viewing from a distance due
to the large parcel size.
• The above limitations are not considered significant data gaps that affect the ability of the EP to
identify RECs on the Property.
1.5 Special Terms and Conditions
The Assessment was conducted in accordance with an Agreement between Barr and 3M.
The scope of the Assessment did not involve the collection and analysis of any type of sample. The
Assessment did not involve completion of any surveys or the offering of any opinions or advice with
respect to structural engineering matters, asbestos-containing materials, radon, lead-based paint, lead in
drinking water, wetlands, compliance with environmental regulations, cultural and historic resources,
industrial hygiene, health and safety, ecological resources, endangered species, indoor air quality ,
biological agents, mold, or other conditions that are beyond the scope of the Practice.
Barr has performed its work in a manner consistent with the care and skill ordinarily exercised by
members of the environmental profession under similar budget and time constraints. Within this context,
Barr assumes responsibility for its own observations, along with its interpretation of the information
gathered. No other warranty is made or intended.
Because Barr was not retained to verify information, Barr assumes no responsibility for the accuracy of
information that it obtained from other sources including, without limitation, regulatory and government
agencies, persons interviewed about the Property, and vendors of public data. Performance of the Practice
is intended to reduce, but will not eliminate uncertainty regarding the presence of recognized
environmental conditions on the Property. To the extent that Barr does not identify recognized
environmental conditions on the Property, Barr's opinions in the report are not representations that the
Property is free of such conditions. Under no circumstances can Barr represent or warrant that releases of
hazardous substances or petroleum products do not exist on the Property.
1.6 User Reliance
The Assessment has been prepared for the exclusive use of 3M, herein referred to as the “User”. No others
may rely on the Assessment without obtaining a formal authorization in the form of a reliance letter from
Barr. Barr will provide reliance letters for additional parties only if authorized by the User.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 4
2.0 Site Description
2.1 Location and Legal Description
The property is located in the W ½, Section 16, T29, R21, near Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota
(Property). The Property consists of PIN #1602921240002. The Property is approximately 3,500 feet by
2,600 feet and 172.61 acres in size. The Property boundaries are shown on Figure 2.
2.2 Property Setting and Land Use
Topography of the Property is hilly north of 34th Street and slopes downward to a drainage ditch running
west to east through the Property. South of 34th Street the Property slopes downwards to the southeast
(Ref. 5b). Shallow groundwater flow direction at the Property is reportedly to be to the south/southeast
based on the Washington County Geologic Atlas (Ref. 2a), although the flow direction of the shallow
groundwater is believed to be influenced by local discharge/recharge points, the presence of confining
layers, and groundwater withdrawals and land use in nearby areas (Ref. 5f). Regional groundwater flow in
the St. Peter sandstone and the Prairie du Chien group, is generally to the southwest (Ref. 5f).
The Property is currently used for agriculture and is zoned Rural Residential (Ref. 5e). No buildings are
located on the Property (Refs. 1a, 5b). The Property is not connected to water or sewer (Ref. 4c).
Historically the Property has been used for agricultural activities (Ref. 1a). No historical buildings were
identified on the Property (Ref. 1a).
The current use of adjoining properties includes residential, agricultural, and commercial (Ref. 5b). The
past use of adjoining properties includes agricultural and residential (Ref. 1a).
Additional descriptions of the Property setting and land-use are presented in Appendix A.
2.3 User-Provided Information
As detailed in Section 6 of the Practice, the User has responsibilities associated with identifying possible
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property. Barr provided a User Questionnaire
to facilitate gathering information required by the Practice. The completed User Questionnaire is included
in Appendix F.
The User has no knowledge of any environmental liens or activity and use limitations against the Property,
nor any specialized knowledge or experience that is material to identifying recognized environmental
conditions in connection with the Property. Since no sale is pending or imminent, no information was
provided to the environmental professional regarding the relationship between a potential purchase price
and fair market value. Property valuation is not part of the scope of this Assessment. The User did not
report conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases, any obvious indicators that point to the
presence or likely presence of contamination at the Property, or specialized knowledge about the
Property related to the items listed in Section 6 of the Practice (Ref. 4b, Appendix F).
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 5
3.0 Findings and Opinions
This section summarizes observations regarding the presence of hazardous substances or petroleum
products on the Property (findings) and discusses the basis for concluding if a finding is or is not a
recognized environmental condition.
3.1 Definitions
Finding – For the purpose of this Assessment, a finding is an observation regarding the presence of
hazardous substances or petroleum products on the Property which may be considered a recognized
environmental condition, a historical recognized environmental condition, or de minimis condition.
Recognized environmental condition (REC) - A REC is defined by the Practice as “the presence or likely
presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to
the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions
that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. De minims conditions are not
recognized environmental conditions.”
Historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) - An HREC is defined by the Practice as “a past
release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the
property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting
unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any
required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls,
or engineering controls). Before calling the past release a historical recognized environmental condition,
the environmental professional must determine whether the past release is a recognized environmental
condition at the time the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is conducted (for example, if there has
been a change in the regulatory criteria). If the EP considers the past release to be a recognized
environmental condition at the time the Phase I ESA is conducted, the condition shall be included in the
conclusions section of the report as a recognized environmental condition.”
Controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) – A CREC is defined by the Practice as “a recognized
environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products
that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as
evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria
established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain
in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity
and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). A condition considered by the
environmental professional to be a controlled recognized environmental condition shall be listed in the
findings section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report, and as a recognized environmental
condition in the conclusions section of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment report.”
De minimis conditions – As defined by the Practice, conditions determined to be “de minimis” generally do
not present a threat to human health or the environment and generally would not be subject of an
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 6
enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. De minimis
conditions are not considered RECs.
3.2 Findings and Opinions
Barr has identified the following findings and developed the following opinions regarding these findings,
as summarized in the following table.
Finding ID # Description of Finding Opinion with Respect to Finding (REC, CREC, HREC, de minimis)
Finding #1 Groundwater PFAS Impacts in the East Metro Area: Nearby Superfund sites have been identified by the state as contributing sources of widespread PFAS contamination in groundwater, including the Washington County Landfill, located approximately 3,000 feet northeast of the Property, and the Oakdale Dump site, located 3,600 feet west of the
Property. Both sites are estimated to be side-gradient of the
Property for shallow groundwater, and the Washington
County Landfill site may be upgradient of the Property for groundwater in bedrock. Drinking water advisories have been issued for private wells southeast of the Property. No wells are currently present on the Property. The Minnesota Department of Health has designated a Special Well Construction Area in this part of Lake Elmo that includes the
Property, which restricts well construction in some cases and
requires PFAS sampling of new wells in other cases in order
to prevent exposure to PFAS. City water is available near the Property. Additionally, the state is currently implementing area-wide investigations and remedial efforts to address PFAS in the East Metro Area.
The PFAS in groundwater is a regional concern and institutional controls are in place to address PFAS in Lake Elmo groundwater, therefore this finding is not considered a REC.
Finding #2 Miscellaneous Debris: Occasional areas of miscellaneous,
inert debris were observed dispersed across the site.
Observed materials included wood, metal fragments, plastic and glass shards, a small ash pile, and a stack of cinder blocks.
Based on the quantity and nature of
the debris, this finding is considered
a de minimis condition and is not a REC.
Finding #3 Past Agricultural Use: The Property has been used for
agriculture since at least 1936 and there is potential for agricultural chemicals to have been used at the Property.
Because it is assumed that
agricultural chemicals were applied
using industry standard application
rates, and no evidence of inappropriate agricultural chemical applications was identified, this finding is not a REC.
Finding #4 Adjoining LUST Site: One closed LUST site was reported at
an east-adjoining, down-gradient parcel. Soil and
groundwater contamination was reported and delineated in the regulatory records.
Based on the downgradient location of the LUST site, this finding is not a REC.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 7
Finding ID # Description of Finding Opinion with Respect to Finding (REC, CREC, HREC, de minimis)
Finding
#5
Pipelines: Two pipelines were documented on the Property.
One natural gas pipeline was identified running east to west
along the railroad. A petroleum pipeline was identified crossing the Property from northwest to southeast.
There are no regulatory listings
indicating a release from these
pipelines, and there was no staining,
stressed vegetation, or other
indications of a release observed during the site visit. Therefore, this finding is not a REC.
Finding #6 Railroad: The Property includes two parcels that are
separated by an active railroad that is present on an adjoining
property (see Figure 2). The railroad tracks, ballast bedding,
and adjoining ground appeared in good condition and no staining or evidence of a release was observed. There are no regulatory reports of a release related to this railroad property
Railroads can be sources of impacts to
shallow soils; however, based on the
lack of staining or other evidence of
releases, this finding is not considered a REC.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 8
4.0 Conclusions
We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Practice E 1527-13 of PIN #1602921240002, the Property. Any exceptions to, or
deletions from, this Practice are described in Section 1.4 of this report. This assessment has revealed no
evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the Property.
4.1 Deviations
There were no deletions, deviations from, or additions to the Practice associated with the Assessment
other than the limitations and exceptions listed in Section 1.4.
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 9
5.0 References
The following resources are numbered for use as references.
Ref # Resource Years Covered or Item Date
Standard Historical Resources
1a Aerial Photographs 2017, 2013, 2010, 2006, 1997, 1991, 1987, 1984, 1978, 1974, 1966, 1964, 1953, 1947, 1936
3 Fire Insurance Maps Not Available
1c Property Tax Files Not Reviewed
1d Recorded Land Title Records ALTA Commitment for Title
Insurance, First American Title
Insurance Company
File No: NCS-957660-MPLS
Certificate of Title No. 61999
1e USGS Topographic Maps 2013, 1993, 1980, 1972, 1967, 1950, 1949, 1946
1f Local Street Directories 2014, 2010, 2005, 2000, 1995, 1992, 1987, 1982, 1977 Building \ Department Records Not Reviewed
1g Zoning/Land Use Records Not Reviewed Other Historical Sources Not Reviewed Prior Assessments Not Reviewed
Discretionary and Non-Standard Physical Setting Sources
2a Berg, J.A., 2019, Groundwater Atlas of Washington
County, Minnesota: Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources, County Atlas Series C-39, Part B, Report and
Plates 7–9.
2019
2b Soil Survey Staff, Natural Resources Conservation Service,
United States Department of Agriculture. Web Soil
Survey. Available online at
http://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/
Accessed April 29, 2019
2c Published Geologic Report – Bedrock Geology
Julia Steenberg and Andrew Retzler. 2016. Geologic Atlas
of Washington County, Minnesota (Atlas C-39 Part A,
Plate 2). University of Minnesota, Minnesota Geological
Survey.
https://conservancy.umn.edu/handle/11299/178852
Accessed April 29, 2019
Standard Environmental Record Sources
3a EDR Report (Appendix D) April 24, 2019
3b What’s in My Neighborhood? 4/24/2019. Minnesota
Pollution Control Agency. 4/24/2019.
<http://www.pca.state.mn.us/index.php/data/wimn-
whats-in-my-neighborhood/whats-in-my-
neighborhood.html>
April 24, 2019
3c Cleanups in My Community. 4/24/2019. Environmental
Protection Agency. 4/24/2019
April 24, 2019
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 10
Ref # Resource Years Covered or Item Date
https://www.epa.gov/cleanups/cleanups-my-
community
Interviews
4a Property Owner/Key Site Manager:
Jim Kotsmith, Manager, Corporate Environmental
Programs, 651-737-3635
April 29, 2019
4b User Representative:
Jim Kotsmith, Manager, Corporate Environmental
Programs, 651-737-3635
April 29, 2019
4c Public Works/City Engineering:
Kristina Handt, City Administrator, City of Lake Elmo, 651-747-3905
April 29, 2019
Supplemental Resources
5a Minnesota Department of Health
County Well Index
April 26, 2019
5b Site Visit
Emily Cook, Environmental Engineer, 952-832-2648
April 29, 2019
5c Previous Investigation:
Natural Resource Group, Inc., 2008. Phase I Site Assessment, Lake Elmo, MN.
June 8, 2005
5d File Review:
Oakwood Animal Hospital Leak Site #19750
May 1, 2019
5e Lake Elmo Zoning Map. Available online at
http://www.lakeelmo.org/wp-
content/uploads/2019/04/NewZoning3.25.2019.pdf
Accessed May 1, 2019
5f Minnesota Department of Health Notice of Designation
of Special Well Construction Area, Lake Elmo-Oakdale,
Washington County, Minnesota. Available online at
https://www.health.state.mn.us/communities/environmen
t/water/docs/wells/swbca/lakeelmomemo.pdf
March 8, 2017
5g Minnesota 3M PFC Settlement, East Metro Study Area.
Available online at https://3msettlement.state.mn.us/
Accessed April 30, 2019
BARR ENGINEERING CO. Page 11
6.0 Signature and Qualifications of
Environmental Professional
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR 312. I have the specific qualifications based on education,
training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. I
have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and
practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
Barr performed this Assessment in conformance with the ASTM, International (ASTM) Practice E 1527-13.
Special terms, conditions, limitations, and exceptions that apply to the Assessment are described
throughout this Report and in the Appendices.
May 8, 2019
Jennifer Brekken, Environmental Professional (Date)
Qualifications of the Environmental Professional are summarized in Appendix G.
Figures
Id
e
a
l
A
v
e
N
Stillwater Blvd N
Hen
s
l
o
w
Av
e
N
31stStN
Hilo
A
v
e
N
42nd StN
27th St N
Hel
m
o
Ave
N
In
w
o
o
d
A
v
e
N
Im
p
e
r
i
a
l
Ave N
Lake
J
a
n
e
TrN
34th St N
32ndStN
34thSt
26th St N
39thStN
38thStN
40th St N
456713
45676
456714 5
OAKDALE
LAKE ELMO
Beutel's
Pond Lake
Crombie
Pond Lake
PROPERTY LOCATION MAP
Parcel ID 1602921240002
Lake Elmo, MN
FIGURE 1Bar
r
f
o
o
t
e
r
:
4
/
3
0
/
2
0
1
9
1
2
:
0
5
P
M
4
/
3
0
/
2
0
1
9
1
2
:
0
9
P
M
F
i
l
e
:
I
:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
2
3
\
8
2
\
1
2
1
9
\
M
a
p
s
\
R
e
p
o
r
t
s
\
P
h
a
s
e
I
E
S
A
\
P
h
a
s
e
I
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
1
6
0
2
9
2
1
2
4
0
0
0
2
.
a
p
r
x
L
a
y
o
u
t
:
F
i
g
u
r
e
1
-
P
r
o
p
e
r
t
y
L
o
c
a
t
i
o
n
U
s
e
r
:
k
a
c
2
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
1Property Boundary (Approximate)
Municipal Boundary
ProSert\
LoFation
,maJer\ 6ourFe 0n*eo :06 7Zin Cities
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Pond
Storm Sewer Inlet
General Utilities Location
Culvert
Electrical Transmission Tower
Hydrant
PondAbove Ground
Equipment for
Gas Pipeline
Electrical Equipment and
Utilities in Railroad Property
Finding #5 - Pipeline
Finding #4 -
Adjoining
LUST Site
Finding #6 - Railroad
Finding #5 - Pipeline
Gas Pipeline Marker
Gas Pipeline Marker
WK6W1
6WLOOZDWHU%OYG1
24514
24513
2456
5
3523(57</$<2870$3
3DUFHO,'16 14
/DNH(OPR01
),*85(
%DUUIRRWHU
5
1
1
3
5
3
0
5
1
1
4
3
0
)
L
O
H
,
?
3
U
R
M
H
F
W
V
?
3
?
?
1
1
?
0
D
S
V
?
5
H
S
R
U
W
V
?
3
K
D
V
H
,
(
6
$
?
3
K
D
V
H
,
5
H
S
R
U
W
1
6
1
4
D
S
U
[
/
D
\
R
X
W
)
L
J
X
U
H
3
U
R
S
H
U
W
\
/
D
\
R
X
W
8
V
H
U
N
D
F
5 5
)HHW
!;N
3URSHUW\%RXQGDU\ $SSUR[LPDWH
1DWXUDO*DV3LSHOLQH $SSUR[LPDWH
3HWUROHXP3LSHOLQH $SSUR[LPDWH
! !2YHUKHDG(OHFWULFDO/LQH
'UDLQDJH'LWFK
'HEULV
5DLOURDG
Imagery Source: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
)LQGLQJ1*URXQGZDWHU3)$6,PSDFWV
LQWKH(DVW0HWUR$UHD
)LQGLQJ0LVFHOODQHRXV'HEULV
)LQGLQJ33DVW$JULFXOWXUDO8VH
Appendices
Appendix A
Phase I Documentation
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-1
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Appendix A Phase I Environmental Site Asses sment Documentation PIN #1602921240002 Lake Elmo, Minnesota May 2019 I. General Property Information
Property location map is shown on Figure 1. Property layout with existing and former features is
shown on Figure 2 .
Property name: PIN #1602921240002
County: Washington
Township : 29N Range: 21W Section: W 1/2
Property size : 172.61 acres
Current Property owner and year of purchase: 3M has owned the Property since 1966.
Current Occupant(s): None
Current Property use : Agriculture
II. Physical Setting
Surface elevation : Approximately 985 feet above mean sea level (MSL; Ref. 1e).
Topographic conditions of Property : The Property is hilly north of 34 th Street and slopes downward
to a drainage ditch running west to east through the Property. South of 34 th Street the Property
slopes downwards to the southeast (Ref. 5b).
Stratigraphy (soils and upper bedrock units): Soils at the Property consist mainly of well -drained
Santiago silt loam with six to 15 percent slopes, well -drained Antigo silt loam with two to six percent
slopes, and well-drained Antigo silt loam with six to 15 percent slopes (Ref. 2b ). A log from a water
supply well that was sealed on a nearby Property in 2007 indicates alluvial deposits overlying
Platteville Limestone, located 25 feet below ground surface (bgs). The well extended into the
underlying St. Peter Sandstone (Ref. 5a).
Nearest surface water body (name and distance): A pond is located on the east side of the
Property south of 34th Street North (Ref. 1a, 5a). Several other nearby surface water features are
present in various directions.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-2
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Anticipated groundwater depth/flow direction: The anticipated groundwater depth/flow direction
is based on the log for the sealed well (Ref. 5a), Washington County Geologic Atlas (Ref. 2a), and
information from MDH’s 2007 Memo outlining a designation special well construction area (Ref. 5 f).
Shallow groundwater at the Property likely occurs in the alluvium present from 0 to 25 feet bgs, and
the groundwater in the St. Peter Sandstone is approximately 60 feet bgs. The shallow groundwater
reportedly flows to the south /southeast (Ref. 2a), although the flow direction of the shallow
groundwater is believed to be influenced by local discharge/recharge points, the presence of
confining layers, and groundwater withdrawals and land use in nearby areas . Groundwater levels and
flow directions are also influenced by recharge from losing streams and by natural discharge to local
lakes and streams.
Regional groundwater flow in the St. Peter sandstone and the Prairie du Chien group, is generally to
the southwest.
III. Municipal Information & Utility Service to Property
The locations of Property utilities (wells, septic systems, sewer lines ) are shown on Figure 2.
Water Supply
Municipal water supply and intake location(s): The City of Lake Elmo’s water supply comes from
the Prairie du Chein and Jordan aquifers (Ref. 4c).
Property potable/process water suppl y: The Property is not connected to municipal water (Ref. 4c).
Have other potable water supplies serviced the Property? If yes, describe : No. (Ref. 4a)
Sanitary Service
Type of sanitary service for the Property : The Property is not connected to sanitary service (Ref.
4c).
Have other methods of sanitary service been used at the Property? No. (Ref. 4a)
Evidence of current onsite septic systems or drain fields: No evidence of septic systems or drain
fields were observed (Ref. 5b).
Stormwater Management
Is the Property serviced by storm water drains, storm sewers, ponds or drainage ditches? No.
(Ref. 4a). A storm sewer intake and manhole were observed on the access road to the Public Works
facility. Culverts and ditches were also observed in the field on the Property (Ref. 5a).
Do any neighboring properties discharge to the Property? Stormwater discharges to the Property
from a culvert located on the west site of the Property near the access road to the Public Works
facility. The origin of the stormwater is unknown (Ref. 5b).
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-3
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Property Zoning
The Property is zoned Rural Residential (Ref. 5e).
IV. Current Property Use
Current Property Waste Management
Waste is not currently generated at the Property (Ref. 5 b).
V. Property, Adjoining, and Surrounding Area Regulatory Status
Regulatory database summary and supporting information is in EDR Report located in Appendix D.
Only information generated through searches of databases required by ASTM 1527-13 and within the
appropriate minimum search distances were reviewed.
Property and Adjoining Property Regulatory Status
Table 1
ASTM List Address
Listing
Status
Potential or
Documented Release
to Environment
Was a Regulatory
File Review
Completed?
RCRA NONGEN/NLR,
FINDS, ECHO
Hilpisch Chiropractic
Clinic, 8603 34th Street
N (East Adjoining)
Active Downgradient. No
evidence of release to
the environment.
No, site is
downgradient of
Property.
WIMN, LUST, RCRA-
CESQG, SRS, VAPOR
Oakwood Animal
Hospital, 8611 N 34th
St (East Adjoining)
Closed Downgradient. Closed
LUST site, with noted
groundwater
contamination.
Yes
RCRA-CESQG, WIMN,
TIER 2, UST, NPDES
Lake Elmo Public
Works, 3445 Ideal Ave
N (West Adjoining)
Active Tier 2 facility listing,
small quantity
hazardous waste
generator
No, there is no listing
associated with a
release to the
environment.
RCRA-CESQG CVS Pharmacy 17218,
7900 32nd St N (West
Adjoining)
Active RCRA Generator. No
evidence of release to
environment.
No, there is no listing
associated with a
release to the
environment.
RCRA-LQG, WIMN,
MANIFEST, TIER 2
Target Store T2135,
7900 32nd St N (West
Adjoining)
Active RCRA Generator. No
evidence of release to
environment.
No, there is no listing
associated with a
release to the
environment.
WIMN, MANIFEST,
FINDS, RCRA
NONGEN/NLR, ECHO,
RCRA-CESQG
Myron’s Service
Center/Central
Sweeping, 3240 Ideal
Ave N (West Adjoining)
Active Auto shop and RCRA
Generator. No
evidence of release to
environment.
No, there is no listing
associated with a
release to the
environment.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-4
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Abbreviations:
RCRA NonGEn/NLR – RCRA Non-Generator
FINDS – Facility Index System/Facility Registry System
ECHO – Enforcement & Compliance History Information
WIMN – What’s in my Neighborhood?
LUST – Leak Sites
RCRA-CESQG – RCRA Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator
SRS – Site Remediation Section Database
VAPOR – Vapor Intrusion
TIER 2 – Tier 2 Facility Listing
UST – Underground Storage Tanks
NPDES – Wastewater Permits Listing
RCRA-LQG – RCRA Large Quantity Generators
MANIFEST – Hazardous Waste Manifest Data
File review results are summarized in Section VI. Justification for not completing a file review, if
applicable, is provided above.
Surrounding Area Regulatory Status
The following table provides a summary of those database listing that the environmental professional
has identified as potentially upgradient. Downgradient and/or side gradient listing are also included
if the environmental professional has determined that the nature of the listing (e.g., Superfund site,
chlorinated solvent release, landfill, etc.) should be evaluated for their potential to impact the
Property.
Table 2
Name Address ASTM Listing(s)
Distance &
Direction
From Property Comments
Do issues related
to the listing
indicate the
potential for
impacts to soil,
groundwater or
vapor at the
Property?
Washington
County
Sanitary
Landfill
4029
Jamaca
Ave N
WIMN, SRS,
SWF/LF, INST
CONTROL, SHWS,
LCP, NPDES, ROD,
US ENG
CONTROLS,
DELISTED NPL, CDC
HAZDAT, SEMS,
MN LS, MN DEL
PLP, FINANCIAL
ASSURANNCE
Approximately
0.5 mi. NW,
Upgradient
Potential
contributor to the
East Metro PFAS
impacts.
Yes, potential for
contributing PFAS
impacts to area
groundwater (Ref.
5f).
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-5
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Name Address ASTM Listing(s)
Distance &
Direction
From Property Comments
Do issues related
to the listing
indicate the
potential for
impacts to soil,
groundwater or
vapor at the
Property?
Oakdale
Dump
N Hadley
Ave & N
Granada
Ave,
Oakdale,
MN
NPL, SEMS, US ENG
CONTROLS, ROD,
PRP, ICIS
0.69 mi. W,
Sidegradient
Potential
contributor to the
East Metro PFAS
impacts.
Yes, potential for
contributing PFAS
impacts to area
groundwater (Ref.
5f).
3M Company
Residence
7990 40th
St. N,
Oakdale,
MN
WIMN 0.307 mi. NW,
Upgradient
Inactive hazardous
waste permit.
No, no evidence
of potential for
impacts to the
Property.
McDonald’s
Oakdale
Unknown WIMN 0.182 mi.
WSW,
Sidegradient
Inactive
Construction
stormwater permit
No, no evidence
of a release or
potential impacts
to the Property.
Carlson
Residence
8251 Deer
Pond Ct.
N, Lake
Elmo, MN
LUST, SRS, VAPOR,
WIMN
0.44 mi. N,
Upgradient
LUST, SRS, and
VAPOR listing
related to a fuel oil
release. No
groundwater
contamination
reported, and the
LUST was closed in
March 2018
No, no
groundwater
contamination
reported from the
LUST site. Release
is located greater
than 250 feet
from Property.
Slumberland
Inc.
1
Imitation
Place,
Oakdale,
MN
MANIFEST, WIMN 0.45 mi. W,
Sidegradient
Hazardous waste
generator and
industrial
stormwater permit.
No, no evidence
of potential for
impacts to the
Property.
Tribal Sites
As part of the EDR Report, locations of Native American reservations equal to or greater than 640
acres in size within the search area are reported. No reservations meeting this size criterion were
identified within 1 mile of the Property (Ref. 3a) The local government official was not aware of any
Native American reservations within one mile of the Property (Ref. 4c).
Orphan Site Summary
None identified (Ref. 3a).
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-6
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
VI. Report and File Review Summary
Previous Environmental Investigations/Remedial Actions of the Property
Relevant portions of previous investigation reports completed for the Property are reproduced in
Appendix E. The following table gives a general summary of the each known previous investigation’s
scope, conclusions, and recommendat ions. Each investiga tion is described according to its specific
reference number, as denoted in the Information Resources section of the Assessment report.
Ref. # Investigation Summary Findings
5c A Draft Phase I ESA was completed in 2008 by Natural
Resources Group, Inc. for a portion of the Property. No
figures were included to confirm the portion of the
Property included in the ESA.
No RECs identified. Possible historical
use of agricultural chemicals at the
Site constitutes a de minimis
condition.
Property File Review Summary
The Property was not identified in a standard database; no file review was completed.
Property Historical Releases
No chemical or petroleum releases were reported for the Property. No remedial actions or
environmental violations have occurred on the Property (Ref. 4b).
Environmental Liens
No environmental liens were identified for the Property (Ref . 4b).
Activity Use Limitations
No institutional or engineering controls were identified for the Property (Ref . 4b). MDH has outlined a
special well construction area to reduce exposure risk for PFAS in groundwater (Ref. 5f).
Proceedings Involving the Property
No pending, threatened, or p ast litigation, a dministrative proceedings, or government notices
relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products were identified (Ref. 4b).
Adjoining Property File Review Summary
Relevant portions of the regulatory file reviewed for the adjoining properties are reproduced in
Appendix E. The following table gives a general summary from each regulatory file reviewed .
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-7
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Ref.
#
Adjoining
Property Name
and Direction
ASTM
Listing File Review Summary
5d Oakdale Animal
Hospital, East
Adjoining,
Downgradient
LUST
Site
#19750
Two steel fuel oil tanks were identified on the P roperty. A Limited
Phase II Investigation was conducted to identify groundwater, soil,
and vapor impact extents. Soil impacts were delineated , primarily
isolated to the area around the south tank, extending 8 -21 feet
below ground surface. Perched groundwat er DRO impacts were
observed in the vicinity of the south tank ; permanent groundwater,
located approximately 20 feet below the soil impacts, was not
sampled. The soil vapor sample concentrations did not exceeded
the 10X Intrusion Screening Level s. Soil and groundwater
contamination was delineated and confined to the property. The
leak site was closed in December 2015.
VII. Property and Nearby Property Land -Use History
Property Land-use History
Original Property development (year/use): Records show that the Property was developed for
agriculture since at least 1936 (Ref. 1a).
Chronology of Past Property use/ownership : The Property has been owned by 3M since 19 66.
Historical Property Structures
There were no historic structures identified on the Property (Ref. 1a).
Demolition Debris: Not applicable.
Current Property Structures , Renovations , and Additions
No structures are present on the Property (Refs. 1a, 5b).
Renovation Debris: Not applicable.
Building Additions : Not applicable.
Nearby Property Land -Use History
North Historical Use: Agricultural (Ref. 1a)
Current Use: Residential (Ref. 5b)
South Historical Use: Agricultural (Ref. 1a)
Current Use: Residential, vacant parcel (Ref. 5b)
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-8
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
East Historical Use: Agricultural (Ref. 1a)
Current Use: Residential, commercial (Advanced Auto Transport, Inc., Animal Inn pet Resort
& Spa, Integrated Life Counseling Center; Ref. 5b)
West Historical Use: Idea Avenue N, agricultural (Ref. 1a)
Current Use: Ideal Avenue N, r esidential, commercial, agricultural (Ref. 5b)
General type of current or past uses in the surrounding areas : The surrounding area has been
used for agricultural purposes since at least 1936. Residences were developed to the north of the
Property in the early 1950s, to the west and southeast in the early 1960s, and to the south in the late
1990s (Ref. 1a).
Historical releases associated with adjacent properties or communit ies: Nearby Superfund sites
are being assessed as potential contributing factors to the area wide PFAS contamination, including
the Washington County Landfill, located northeast of the Property, and the Oakdale Dump site,
located west of the Property. The state has on-going investigations and remedial actions to address
the groundwater impacts in the East Metro Area (Ref. 5g). MDH has outlined a special well
construction area to reduce exposure risk for PFAS in groundwater (Ref. 5f).
VIII. Site Reconnaissance
The objective of the site reconnaissance i s to obtain information indicating the likelihood of
identifying recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property (ASTM 1527 -13
Sec 9.1). Existing Property features are shown in the Property layout on Figure 2. Photographs
obtained during the Property inspection are in Appendix B.
Date of inspection : April 29, 2019
Name of individual conducting site visit : Emily Cook, Barr Engineering Co.
Weather information : 45 degrees Fahrenheit, cloudy
Interior Observations
No structures present on the Property.
Features of Current Property Structure(s)
No structures present on the Property .
Unoccupied occupant spaces : No unoccupied occupant spaces on the Property.
Exterior Observations
Methodology used to observe the Property : The Property was observed on foot. Due to the large
area of the Property, representative areas of the Property were observed.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-9
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Access to the Property (vehicular access and restrictions to public access ): Access to the Property
was from public roads.
Periphery of the Property (roads, streets , and parking facilities, etc.): The Property is bordered to
the north by residential properties, to the east by residential and commercial properties, to the south
by a railroad and a vacant property, and to the east by Ideal Avenu e and residential, commercial , and
agricultural use.
Ground surface cover (paved, gravel, grass): The ground surface cover at the Property is primarily
agricultural fields with residual crop coverage. There are wooded and grassy areas along the
perimeter of the fields.
Visible evidence of filling, excavation, or burned areas: A small berm was observed at the
drainage ditch in the northern portion of the Property. Small piles of burned debris were observed in
the wooded area in the NE corner of the Proper ty.
Visible evidence of vegetative stress: None observed.
Pits, ponds, lagoons, and standing surface water : A pond is located on the east edge of the
Property, immediately north of the railroad. Standing water was observed behind the berm and in the
drainage ditch in the northern portion of the Property. A stormwater pond is located at the entrance
of the Public Works access road.
Stained soil or pavement : None observed.
Wastewater, stormwater, and other visible liquid discharge points into a pipe, pond, ditch,
stream adjoining property or the Property: Stormwater discharge was observed from the culvert
located at the west edge of the Property near the Public Works access road into the drainage ditch.
Indications of past uses of the Property likely to involve the use, treatment, storage, disposal
or generation of hazardous substances or petroleum product s: None observed.
Nonpotable/process wells : None observed.
Pipelines across or into Property : A gas pipeline runs through the Property along Ideal Avenue at
the west Property boundary. Markers, pipeline access points, and above ground pipeline features
were observed. A petroleum pipeline runs through the Property from the NE corner to the SE corner
of the Property. Pipeline markers were observed at multiple locations on the Property.
Rail lines: A rail line runs east -west through the Property
Transformers: A transformer tower was observed in the northern portion of the Property.
Outdoor Chemical Storage Areas /Drums: None observed.
BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Page A-10
\\barr.com \projects\Mpls\23 MN\82\23821219 3M Lake Elmo Phase Is\WorkFiles\1602921240002\Appendix
A\PHIESA_Appendix A_1602921240002.docx
Underground Utility Locations : Underground utilities, including gas, fiber optic and electric, are
generally located on the west edge of the parcel, along Ideal Ave. Water utilities and a hydrant are
located on the south side of 34 th St, across from Public Works.
Odors: None observed.
Evidence of Use, Production or Disposal of Controlled Substances (as defined by 21 CFR Part
802): None observed.
VIII. Interior and Exterior USTs and ASTs
None observed.
IX. Interviews
The objective of interviews is to obtain information indicating recognized environmental condition in
connection with the property (ASTM 1527 -13 Sec 10.1). Especially relevant information from the
interviews (Refs. 4a, 4b, 4c) is included and documented throughout the Assessment report and
Appendix A.
Appendix B
Property Inspection Photographs
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Petroleum pipeline markers tothe north of property on residential street
Map 1 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: NE edge of property, woodedarea, debris, small piles of burned material
Map 2 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: NE corner of property, woodedarea, cinder block pile, wood debris
Map 3 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: DebrisMap 4 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Transmission tower, overheadlines run to the south and to the east,debris at base (planting pots, empty paintcan, fry cooker)
Map 5 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Culvert, drainage ditch flowingeast
Map 6 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Low spot/ swamp, surroundedby berm
Map 7 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(
!(
!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Culvert, drainage ditchMap 8 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(
!(!P456713
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Utilities along Ideal Ave andpublic works roadway (gas pipeline flags,fiber optics marker, electrical, sanitarysewer)
Map 9 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P 5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Petroleum pipeline markersnear property boundary, north of 34th
Map 10 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P 5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P456714
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Petroleum pipeline markersnear property boundary, south of 34th
Map 11 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Wood and debris pile on eastproperty edge
Map 12 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Petroleum pipeline markerMap 13 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Low spot, ponded water,petroleum pipeline continues to railroadto the south
Map 14 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P 5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Water utility, hydrant and gatevalve markers near property boundaryalong 34th
Map 15 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P456713
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Property at corner of Ideal Aveand 34th, views south and east, typicalagricultural use on property
Map 16 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(
!(
!P456713
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Gas pipeline above groundequipment
Map 17 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(
!(!P456713
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Railroad and above groundequipment between south and middlesections of property
Map 18 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Railroad tracks throughproperty, tracks run east-west
Map 19 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Watering tankMap 20 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Hunting blind and feeders infield
Map 21 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet
!(!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(
!(!(!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!(
!P
5
45676
456713
456713
456714
Barr Footer: ArcGIS 10.6, 2019-04-30 12:55 File: I:\Projects\23\82\1219\Maps\Reports\Phase I ESA\Photo_Log\Property Inspection Photographs - 1602921240002.mxd User: jjl2
!(!P456713
Date: 4/29/2019Comment: Gas pipeline accessMap 22 of 22PROPERTY INSPECTIONPHOTOGRAPHSParcel ID 1602921240002Lake Elmo, MN
Imagery: NearMap (April 19, 2019)
;N
!P Photo Indicator
!(Photo Location
Site Boundary
0 25 50
Feet
0 1,000 2,000
Feet