HomeMy WebLinkAbout9-24-19 City Council Workshop Packet
NOTICE OF MEETING
City Council Special Workshop
3800 Laverne Avenue North
September 24, 2019
6:30 PM
AGENDA
I. Call to Order 6:30 PM
II. SAC Count Consideration for Private Residential Club Houses 6:30 PM
III. Adjourn 7:00 PM
Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public
Services in a Fiscally Responsible Manner
While Preserving the City’s Open Space
Character
STAFF REPORT
DATE: September 24, 2019
DISCUSSION
AGENDA ITEM: SAC Count Consideration for Private Residential Club Houses
SUBMITTED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator
BACKGROUND:
In July Gonyea submitted an application to the Met Council for a SAC (Sewer Availability Charge)
determination for their clubhouse at Legacy at Northstar. The city requires this for all non-single family
homes. We even required it for a business that is proposing only to connect to city water, not sewer,
because the city policy has been to charge the same number of REC (residential equivalent charges) for
city water and sewer access charges as determined by the Met Council. It makes it easier to administer if
there is one uniform way of determining the number of REC units.
The Met Council made a SAC determination on July 25, 2019. A copy of the determination is included in
your packet. It outlines how the number of SAC were determined. They received 3 SAC, one for each
shower, and 1.53 (or 2) SACs for the number of fixtures (sinks, toilets, drinking fountains, etc).
Craig Allen, Gonyea, called me after receiving the total permit fee information. He stated that in other
communities where they have done this clubhouse they only paid 1 SAC and were considered residential.
I went over the SAC determination letter with him and suggested if he thought it was wrong how they
calculated it he could contact Met Council or make adjustments to his plan. I asked him to provide me
with the list of other cities where they have built this and said I would follow up to see if we missed
something. Craig later provided the list of building costs from three other cities-Champlin, Plymouth
and Maple Grove. I reached out to all three and got a response from two cities. I asked them how they
charge their city WAC and SAC and if there was some exemption for clubhouses from the Met Council
that I was unaware of.
The building official in Plymouth said:
Plymouth City code states that it will charge the equal assessment of units for both SAC and WAC fees as
Met Council charges. All community club houses (commercial use) are assigned these fees. We typically
see Met Council assign 1 SAC charge for these buildings (small party room, office, 1 bathroom, pool side
deck and the pool).
Note: the clubhouse at Legacy is over 1300 square feet, includes 3 showers/bathrooms, indoor and
outdoor kitchens, dining area and great hall. Outside there will also be a pool.
The community development director in Maple Grove looked into the issue and found that they had
undercharged Gonyea. The correct SAC amount should have been 3 units.
I also checked with the Woodbury Building Official since they have similar developments. His response
was:
We use the Met Council determinations for all of our SAC determinations and collections. The number of
SAC is based on what the contractor submits to Metropolitan Council for the determination and we
collect this as a pass through fee for them. The number of SAC assessed purely depends on the building
size, pool and interior items being installed in the clubhouse /pool house projects. Each one is different
in each of our developments.
Our club houses are based on a Commercial permits and NOT under a single family residential permit.
Staff also checked with Stillwater since they have some similar developments. The City of Stillwater
does not charge city SAC fees. They do collect the same number of WACs ($1,000 per WAC) as Met
Council SACs on their determination letter.
Staff has reached out to the Met Council for a review as well. It appears that they may have been
undercharged in those other communities where they only had 1 SAC. Due to some Met Council staff
being out of the office they have not completed their review but I expect to have a more comprehensive
explanation in time to share with City Council on Tuesday.
ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL:
Should the City Council adopt a policy different for WAC and SAC charges that doesn’t correlate to the
Met Council determination?
PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS:
The Mayor and Council Member McGinn have asked for this issue to be discussed by the Council after
hearing concerns from the developer. The concern as I understand it is that there should not be this many,
if any, units charged to the clubhouse because the residents in the homes in Legacy at Northstar have already
paid their WAC and SAC with their building permits. It has also been stated that this in not like other
commercial properties because it is not open to the public and will only be in use a few months out of the
year.
SAC units are determined based upon the maximum potential daily wastewater flow. The Met Council
associates 247 gallons of maximum potential daily wastewater flow with one SAC unit.
As previously mentioned city policy, as stated in the fee schedule, is to charge City SAC, WAC and
connection charges on a per REC basis.
If Council wants to change the amount that Gonyea is being charged they should think in terms of a policy
change that could impact a group of users so as not to be arbitrary and capricious. According to the City
Attorney, the legal definition of arbitrary and capricious is a willful and unreasonable action without
consideration or in disregard of facts or law or without determining principle.
A judge may rule that decisions are “arbitrary and capricious” for several reasons including:
-there was a clear error in judgment
-there was an absence of a rational connection between the facts found and the choice made
- the action was not based upon consideration of relevant factors
-there was an abuse of discretion
-the action was not in accordance with the law, or taken without the required legal procedures
For example, Council may wish to charge only 50%, 75% or some other portion of the SAC units to new
commercial units as an economic development incentive to increase the tax base. However, it should be
noted that the clubhouse will likely be tax exempt once it is turned over to the HOA after the developer
leaves. This is the case for other clubhouses in residential areas in Washington County.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Met Council fee: 5x $2,485=$12,425
City SAC and connection fees: 5x $4,000=$20,000
City WAC and connection fees: 5x $4,000=$20,000
As noted in the 2018 Audit presentation, the water and sewer funds are not covering operating expenses
with user charges. Trunk fees such as WAC and SAC, are currently filing the shortfall. The long range
financial plan for the utilities last year estimated that there would be 70 commercial WAC/SAC added in
2019. To date there have only been 14. Once the finance director performs the annual update to the utility
pro forma, more information about the financial impact will be known.
OPTIONS:
1) Make no changes to policy
2) Provide direction to staff on how to amend the policy of charging WAC and SAC on a per REC
basis
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff would recommend no changes to our current policy. It appears consistent with what we’ve heard
from other communities.
ATTACHMENTS:
• Legacy Clubhouse SAC determination
MCES USE: Letter Reference: 190725C2 Address ID: 728069 Payment ID: 423551
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Date of Determination: 07/25/19 Determination Expiration: 07/25/21
Greetings!
Please see the determination below.
Project Name: Clubhouse
Project Address: 10901 39th Street North
Suite #/Campus: N/A
City Name: Lake Elmo
Applicant: Craig Allen, GWSA Land Development
Special Notes: None
Charge Calculation:
Showers: 3 showers @ 1 shower / SAC = 3.00
Fixture Units: 26.00 fixture units @ 17 fixture units / SAC = 1.53
Total Charge: 4.53 or 5.00
Credit Calculation:
N/A
Total Credit: 0
Net SAC: 5.00 = 5 SAC Due
The business information was provided to MCES by the applicant at this time. It is the City’s responsibility to substantiate the
business use and size at the time of the final inspection. If there is a change in use or size, a redetermination will need to be
made. If you have any questions email me at: toni.janzig@metc.state.mn.us.
Thank you,
Toni Janzig
SAC Technician
Please visit our SAC website by going to: http://www.metrocouncil.org/SACprogram