HomeMy WebLinkAbout#09 - Water Supply Plan STAFF REPORT
DATE: 5/7/2020
CONSENT
ITEM #
TO: City Council
FROM: Marty Powers, Public Works Director
AGENDA ITEM: Approval of the Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan Update to be submitted to
MET Council and MN DNR
REVIEWED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator
Jack Griffin, Focus Engineering
BACKGROUND:
The Council is being asked to formally adopt the Lake Elmo Water Supply plan dated March 13,
2020.
ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL:
Should the Council formally adopt the Lake Elmo Water Supply plan and submit the certification
of adoption to the MN DNR, and submit the final approved copy to the MET Council?
PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS:
As part of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan, Public Works and Focus Engineering has been working
with the MN DNR and MET Council over the past several years to update the Lake Elmo Water
Supply Plan. The city recently received approval of the plan contingent upon formal adoption by the
Lake Elmo City Council. There have been numerous communications and modifications which lead
to the MN DNR’s approval.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Fiscal impact is unknown at this time. The plan contains certain requirements to be met by the
City, including water conservation measures, as part of operating a public water supply system.
City Council Meeting Page 2 Regular Item #13
6/5/2018
OPTIONS:
The Council has the following options:
1) Adopt the Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan dated March 13, 2020.
2) Do not adopt Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan and provide direction to staff to make certain
revisions for resubmittal.
3) Table the submittal
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff and Engineering is recommending that Council adopt the Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan
dated March 13, 2020 and submit the Certification of Adoption to MN DNR and submit a final
copy MET Council.
“Move to adopt the Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan dated March 13, 2020 and submit the
Certification of Adoption to MN DNR and submit a final copy MET Council.”
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan dated March 13, 2020.
2. Certificate of adoption
3. Lake Elmo Approval Letter
1
Local Water Supply Plan Template Third Generation for 2016-2018
Revised June 30, 2017
Revised March 13, 2020 - DNR and Metropolitan Council Review Comments
Formerly called Water Emergency & Water Conservation Plan
2
Cover photo by Molly Shodeen
For more information on this Water Supply Plan Template, please contact the DNR Division of Ecological
and Water Resources at (651) 259-5034 or (651) 259-5100.
Copyright 2015 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources
This information is available in an alternative format upon request.
Equal opportunity to participate in and benefit from programs of the Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources is available to all individuals regardless of race, color, creed, religion, national origin, sex,
marital status, public assistance status, age, sexual orientation, disability or activity on behalf of a local
human rights commission. Discrimination inquiries should be sent to Minnesota DNR, 500 Lafayette
Road, St. Paul, MN 55155-4049; or the Equal Opportunity Office, Department of the Interior,
Washington, DC 20240.
3
Table of contents
INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP) ............................................................... 6
Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan ........................................................................... 6
Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA) .............................................................................. 6
Benefits of completing a WSP ................................................................................................... 6
WSP Approval Process ............................................................................................................. 7
PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION.................................. 9
A. Analysis of Water Demand ................................................................................................. 9
B. Treatment and Storage Capacity ..................................................................................... 11
Treatment and storage capacity versus demand ........................................................................... 12
C. Water Sources ................................................................................................................. 12
Limits on Emergency Interconnections .......................................................................................... 13
D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark .............................. 13
Water Use Trends ........................................................................................................................... 13
Projection Method .......................................................................................................................... 14
E. Resource Sustainability .................................................................................................... 14
Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark ................................................................................................. 14
Water Level Data ............................................................................................................................ 14
Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council
Benchmark ...................................................................................................................................... 15
Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans ....................................... 22
F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) ...................................................................................... 22
Adequacy of Water Supply System ................................................................................................. 22
Proposed Future Water Sources ..................................................................................................... 24
Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark .............................................. 24
PART 2. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROCEDURES ..................................................... 25
A. Emergency Response Plan .............................................................................................. 25
B. Operational Contingency Plan ......................................................................................... 26
C. Emergency Response Procedures .................................................................................. 26
4
Emergency Telephone List .............................................................................................................. 26
Current Water Sources and Service Area ....................................................................................... 26
Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies .................................................................................... 27
Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures .............................................................................. 27
Notification Procedures .................................................................................................................. 30
Enforcement ................................................................................................................................... 31
PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN ................................................................................ 32
Progress since 2006 ................................................................................................................ 32
A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions ................................................... 33
B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR ............................... 34
Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10% .......................... 34
Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD) ...................... 36
Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use ...... 37
Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand .......................................... 38
Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day to the Average Day Demand to Less Than 2.6 ......... 38
Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures ................................................................. 39
Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection
Planning .......................................................................................................................................... 41
Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten
years? .............................................................................................................................................. 41
C. Regulation ........................................................................................................................ 42
D. Retrofitting Programs ....................................................................................................... 43
Retrofitting Programs ..................................................................................................................... 43
E. Education and Information Programs ............................................................................... 44
Proposed Education Programs ....................................................................................................... 44
PART 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES ............................................... 47
A. Water Demand Projections through 2040 ........................................................................ 47
B. Potential Water Supply Issues ......................................................................................... 47
5
C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand Projections........... 47
D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional) ................................................... 48
Source Water Protection Strategies ............................................................................................... 48
Technical assistance ........................................................................................................................ 48
GLOSSARY ................................................................................................................................ 49
Acronyms and Initialisms ......................................................................................................... 51
APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER............................................. 51
Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries ........................................................ 51
Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan ................................................................................ 51
Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well .................................................... 51
Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan ................................................................................... 51
Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List ................................................................................. 51
Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services ............................................ 51
Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance ................................................... 51
Appendix 8: Graph of Ten Years of Annual Per Capita Water Demand for Each Customer
Category .................................................................................................................................. 51
Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure .......................................................................................... 51
Appendix 10: Ordinances or Regulations Related to Water Use ............................................ 51
Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist ................................................................................. 51
Appendix 12: Sources of Information for Table 10 ................................................................. 51
6
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES – DIVISION OF ECOLOGICAL AND WATER RESOURCES AND METROPOLITAN COUNCIL
INTRODUCTION TO WATER SUPPLY PLANS (WSP)
Who needs to complete a Water Supply Plan
Public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people, large private water suppliers in designated
Groundwater Management Areas, and all water suppliers in the Twin Cities metropolitan area are
required to prepare and submit a water supply plan.
The goal of the WSP is to help water suppliers: 1) implement long term water sustainability and
conservation measures; and 2) develop critical emergency preparedness measures. Your community
needs to know what measures will be implemented in case of a water crisis. A lot of emergencies can be
avoided or mitigated if long term sustainability measures are implemented.
Groundwater Management Areas (GWMA)
The DNR has designated three areas of the state as Groundwater Management Areas (GWMAs) to focus
groundwater management efforts in specific geographies where there is an added risk of overuse or
water quality degradation. A plan directing the DNRs actions within each GWMA has been prepared.
Although there are no specific additional requirements with respect to the water supply planning for
communities within designated GWMAs, communities should be aware of the issues and actions
planned if they are within the boundary of one of the GWMAs. The three GWMAs are the North and
East Metro GWMA (Twin Cities Metro), the Bonanza Valley GWMA and the Straight River GWMA (near
Park Rapids). Additional information and maps are included in the DNR Groundwater Management
Areas webpage.
Benefits of completing a WSP
Completing a WSP using this template, fulfills a water supplier’s statutory obligations under M.S.
M.S.103G.291 to complete a water supply plan. For water suppliers in the metropolitan area, the WSP
will help local governmental units to fulfill their requirements under M.S. 473.859 to complete a local
comprehensive plan. Additional benefits of completing WSP template:
• The standardized format allows for quicker and easier review and approval
• Help water suppliers prepare for droughts and water emergencies.
• Create eligibility for funding requests to the Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) for the
Drinking Water Revolving Fund.
• Allow water suppliers to submit requests for new wells or expanded capacity of existing wells.
• Simplify the development of county comprehensive water plans and watershed plans.
• Fulfill the contingency plan provisions required in the MDH wellhead protection and surface
water protection plans.
• Fulfill the demand reduction requirements of Minnesota Statutes, section 103G.291 subd 3
and 4.
7
• Upon implementation, contribute to maintaining aquifer levels, reducing potential well
interference and water use conflicts, and reducing the need to drill new wells or expand
system capacity.
• Enable DNR to compile and analyze water use and conservation data to help guide decisions.
• Conserve Minnesota’s water resources
If your community needs assistance completing the Water Supply Plan, assistance is available from your
area hydrologist or groundwater specialist, the MN Rural Waters Association circuit rider program, or in
the metropolitan area from Metropolitan Council staff. Many private consultants are also available.
WSP Approval Process
10 Basic Steps for completing a 10-Year Water Supply Plan
1. Download the DNR/Metropolitan Council Water Supply Plan Template from the DNR Water
Supply Plan webpage.
2. Save the document with a file name with this naming convention:
WSP_cityname_permitnumber_date.doc.
3. The template is a form that should be completed electronically.
4. Compile the required water use data (Part 1) and emergency procedures information (Part 2)
5. The Water Conservation section (Part 3) may need discussion with the water department,
council, or planning commission, if your community does not already have an active water
conservation program.
6. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area should complete all the
information discussed in Part 4. The Metropolitan Council has additional guidance information
on their Water Supply webpage. All out-state water suppliers do not need to complete the
content addressed in Part 4.
7. Use the Plan instructions and Checklist document from the DNR Water Supply Plan webpage to
insure all data is complete and attachments are included. This will allow for a quicker approval
process.
8. Plans should be submitted electronically using the MPARS website – no paper documents are
required.
9. DNR hydrologist will review plans (in cooperation with Metropolitan Council in Metro area) and
approve the plan or make recommendations.
10. Once approved, communities should complete a Certification of Adoption form, and send a copy
to the DNR.
8
Complete Table 1 with information about the public water supply system covered by this WSP.
Table 1. General information regarding this WSP
Requested Information Description
DNR Water Appropriation Permit Number(s) 611031
Ownership ☒ Public or ☐ Private
Metropolitan Council Area ☒ Yes or ☐ No (and county name) Washington
Street Address 3880 Laverne Ave. N, Suite 100
City, State, Zip Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Contact Person Name Marty Powers
Title Public Works Director
Phone Number 651-747-3941
MDH Supplier Classification Municipal, Non-municipal transient, non-municipal
non-transient, etc.
9
PART 1. WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND EVALUATION
The first step in any water supply analysis is to assess the current status of demand and availability.
Information summarized in Part 1 can be used to develop Emergency Preparedness Procedures (Part 2)
and the Water Conservation Plan (Part 3). This data is also needed to track progress for water efficiency
measures.
A. Analysis of Water Demand
Complete Table 2 showing the past 10 years of water demand data.
• Some of this information may be in your Wellhead Protection Plan.
• If you do not have this information, do your best, call your engineer for assistance or if
necessary leave blank.
If your customer categories are different than the ones listed in Table 2, please describe the differences
below:
10
Table 2. Historic water demand (see definitions in the glossary after Part 4 of this template)
Year Pop.
Served
Total
Connections
Residential
Water
Delivered
(MG)
C/I/I
Water
Delivered
(MG)
Water
used for
Non-
essential
Wholesale
Deliveries
(MG)
Total Water
Delivered
(MG)
Total Water
Pumped (MG)
Water
Supplier
Services
Percent Unmetered/
Unaccounted
Average Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Max. Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Date of Max.
Demand
Residential
Per Capita
Demand
(GPCD)
Total per
capita
Demand
(GPCD)
2005 2077 495 46 6 .106 52 56 1 .142 .660 7/17 60 68
2006 2919 651 70 6 .139 76 82 1 .208 .813 7/13 66 71
2007 2980 671 108 9 .756 117 142 1 .321 1 7/26 99 108
2008 3400 868 109 8 .120 117 129 1 .321 1 7/3 89 94
2009 2551 905 103 8 3 114 130 1 .312 .970 7/17 110 122
2010 3153 911 81 7 5 94 103 1 .256 .736 8/29 70 82
2011 3212 932 93 7 3 103 112 1 .282 .876 6/30 79 88
2012 165
2013 3200 1050 94 31 4 125 129 1 .342 1 8/25 80 107
2014 3200 1069 89 22 .635 111 112 1 .304 76 95
2015 3600 1152 84 22 .759 106 110 1 .290 .831 8/3 64 81
Avg.
2010-
2015
3273 1029 88 18 2.68 108 122 1 .295 .861 74 91
MG – Million Gallons MGD – Million Gallons per Day GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day
See Glossary for definitions. A list of Acronyms and Initialisms can be found after the Glossary.
11
Complete Table 3 by listing the top 10 water users by volume, from largest to smallest. For each user,
include information about the category of use (residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, or
wholesale), the amount of water used in gallons per year, the percent of total water delivered, and the
status of water conservation measures.
Table 3. Large volume users
Customer Use Category
(Residential, Industrial,
Commercial,
Institutional,
Wholesale)
Amount Used
(Gallons per
Year)
Percent of Total
Annual Water
Delivered
Implementing Water
Conservation
Measures?
(Yes/No/Unknown)
1. HOLIDAY INN COMMERCIAL 3,124,000 2.45 UNKNOWN
2. MACHINE SHED COMMERCIAL 1,681,600 1.32 UNKNOWN
3. HIGH POINTE COMMERCIAL 1,193,000 0.94 UNKNOWN
4. LAKE ELMO INN COMMERCIAL 999,998 0.79 UNKNOWN
5. BREMER BANK COMMERCIAL 992,000 0.78 UNKNOWN
6. ROCKPOINT COMMERCIAL 588,000 0.46 UNKNOWN
7. MI HOMES RESIDENTIAL 527,000 0.41 UNKNOWN
8. BARTHELEMY RESIDENTIAL 477,000 0.37 UNKNOWN
9. LAKE ELMO ELEM COMMERCIAL 467,000 0.37 UNKNOWN
10. ELMO INN ENT COMMERCIAL 450,000 0.35 UNKNOWN
B. Treatment and Storage Capacity
Complete Table 4 with a description of where water is treated, the year treatment facilities were
constructed, water treatment capacity, the treatment methods (i.e. chemical addition, reverse osmosis,
coagulation, sedimentation, etc.) and treatment types used (i.e. fluoridation, softening, chlorination,
Fe/MN removal, coagulation, etc.). Also describe the annual amount and method of disposal of
treatment residuals. Add rows to the table as needed.
Table 4. Water treatment capacity and treatment processes
Treatment
Site ID
(Plant
Name or
Well ID)
Year
Constructed
Treatment
Capacity
(GPD)
Treatment
Method
Treatment
Type
Annual
Volume of
Residuals
Disposal
Process
for
Residuals
Do You
Reclaim
Filter
Backwash
Water?
Insert
Facility ID
here
Add rows
as needed
Total NA NA NA NA
Complete Table 5 with information about storage structures. Describe the type (i.e. elevated, ground,
etc.), the storage capacity of each type of structure, the year each structure was constructed, and the
primary material for each structure. Add rows to the table as needed.
12
Table 5. Storage capacity, as of the end of the last calendar year
Structure Name Type of Storage
Structure
Year Constructed Primary Material Storage Capacity
(Gallons)
Water Tower #1 Elevated storage 1962 Steel 75,000
Water Tower #2 Elevated storage 2006 Composite 750,000
Water Tower #4 Elevated Storage 2018 Composite 1,000,000
Add rows as needed Other -
Total NA NA NA 1,825,000
Treatment and storage capacity versus demand
It is recommended that total storage equal or exceed the average daily demand.
Discuss the difference between current storage and treatment capacity versus the water supplier’s
projected average water demand over the next 10 years (see Table 7 for projected water demand):
C. Water Sources
Complete Table 6 by listing all types of water sources that supply water to the system, including
groundwater, surface water, interconnections with other water suppliers, or others. Provide the name
of each source (aquifer name, river or lake name, name of interconnecting water supplier) and the
Minnesota unique well number or intake ID, as appropriate. Report the year the source was installed or
established and the current capacity. Provide information about the depth of all wells. Describe the
status of the source (active, inactive, emergency only, retail/wholesale interconnection) and if the
source facilities have a dedicated emergency power source. Add rows to the table as needed for each
installation.
Include copies of well records and maintenance summary for each well that has occurred since your last
approved plan in Appendix 1.
Table 6. Water sources and status
Resource Type
(Groundwater,
Surface water,
Interconnection)
Resource Name MN Unique
Well # or
Intake ID
Year
Installed
Capacity
(Gallons
per
Minute)
Well
Depth
(Feet)
Status of Normal
and Emergency
Operations (active,
inactive,
emergency only,
retail/wholesale
interconnection))
Does this Source
have a Dedicated
Emergency Power
Source? (Yes or
No)
Ground Water Well #1 208448 1962 500 808 Emergency only
due to PFAS
No
Ground Water Well #2 603085 2001 1000 285 Active No
Ground Water Well #3 655910 1000 Inactive N/A
Ground Water Well #4 767874 2015 1250 290 Active Yes
Interconnect City of Oakdale Hudson Blvd. 1996 607 Inactive/Emergency
only
N/A
Interconnect City of Oakdale Ideal Ave. 1400 Inactive/Emergency
only
N/A
13
Limits on Emergency Interconnections
Discuss any limitations on the use of the water sources (e.g. not to be operated simultaneously,
limitations due to blending, aquifer recovery issues etc.) and the use of interconnections, including
capacity limits or timing constraints (i.e. only 200 gallons per minute are available from the City of Prior
Lake, and it is estimated to take 6 hours to establish the emergency connection). If there are no
limitations, list none.
Interconnects with City of Oakdale
Hudson Blvd = 12” (capable of serving high pressure zone only at this time)
Ideal Ave = 6” (capable of serving 600 gpm)
D. Future Demand Projections – Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark
Water Use Trends
Use the data in Table 2 to describe trends in 1) population served; 2) total per capita water demand; 3)
average daily demand; 4) maximum daily demand. Then explain the causes for upward or downward
trends. For example, over the ten years has the average daily demand trended up or down? Why is this
occurring?
Demand and population have increased and will continue to increase due to growth and development.
Use the water use trend information discussed above to complete Table 7 with projected annual
demand for the next ten years. Communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area must
also include projections for 2030 and 2040 as part of their local comprehensive planning.
Projected demand should be consistent with trends evident in the historical data in Table 2, as discussed
above. Projected demand should also reflect state demographer population projections and/or other
planning projections.
Table 7. Projected annual water demand
Year Projected
Total
Population
Projected
Population
Served
Projected Total Per
Capita Water Demand
(GPCD)
Projected
Average Daily
Demand
(MGD)
Projected Maximum
Daily Demand (MGD)
2016 8,122 3,960 84 .333 1.0
2017 8,872 4,830 74 .359 1.0
2018 9,622 5,580 74 .414 1.2
2019 10,372 6,330 74 .469 1.4
2020 11,020 7,302 105 .767 2.3
2021 12,184 8,653 105 .909 2.7
2022 13,348 10,004 105 1.050 3.2
2023 14,513 11,355 105 1.192 3.6
2024 15,677 12,708 105 1.334 4.0
2025 16,841 14,056 105 1.476 4.4
2030 18,005 15,407 100 1.541 4.6
2040 22,304 21,165 96 2.032 6.1
GPCD – Gallons per Capita per Day MGD – Million Gallons per Day
14
Projection Method
Describe the method used to project water demand, including assumptions for population and business
growth and how water conservation and efficiency programs affect projected water demand:
Population and peak day water use.
E. Resource Sustainability
Monitoring – Key DNR Benchmark
Complete Table 8 by inserting information about source water quality and quantity monitoring efforts.
The list should include all production wells, observation wells, and source water intakes or reservoirs.
Groundwater level data for DNR’s statewide network of observation wells are available online through
the DNR’s Cooperative Groundwater Monitoring (CGM) webpage.
Table 8. Information about source water quality and quantity monitoring
MN Unique Well #
or Surface Water ID
Type of monitoring
point
Monitoring program Frequency of
monitoring
Monitoring Method
Well #1
208448
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☐ routine MDH
sampling
☒ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☐ continuous
☐ hourly
☒ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☐ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☒ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well #2
603085
☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☐ routine MDH
sampling
☒ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☐ continuous
☐ hourly
☒ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Well #4 ☒ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☐ routine MDH
sampling
☒ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☐ continuous
☐ hourly
☒ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☒ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Add rows to the
table as needed
☐ production well
☐ observation well
☐ source water
intake
☐ source water
reservoir
☐ routine MDH
sampling
☐ routine water
utility sampling
☐ other
☐ continuous
☐ hourly
☐ daily
☐ monthly
☐ quarterly
☐ annually
☐ SCADA
☐ grab sampling
☐ steel tape
☐ stream gauge
Water Level Data
A water level monitoring plan that includes monitoring locations and a schedule for water level readings
must be submitted as Appendix 2. If one does not already exist, it needs to be prepared and submitted
with the WSP. Ideally, all production and observation wells are monitored at least monthly.
15
Complete Table 9 to summarize water level data for each well being monitored. Provide the name of the
aquifer and a brief description of how much water levels vary over the season (the difference between
the highest and lowest water levels measured during the year) and the long-term trends for each well. If
water levels are not measured and recorded on a routine basis, then provide the static water level when
each well was constructed and the most recent water level measured during the same season the well
was constructed. Also include all water level data taken during any well and pump maintenance. Add
rows to the table as needed.
Groundwater hydrographs illustrate the historical record of aquifer water levels measured within a well
and can indicate water level trends over time. For each well in your system, provide a hydrograph for
the life of the well, or for as many years as water levels have been measured. Include the hydrographs in
Appendix 3. An example of a hydrograph can be found on the DNR’s Groundwater Hydrograph
webpage. Hydrographs for DNR Observation wells can be found in the CGM discussed above.
Table 9. Water level data
Unique Well
Number or Well ID
Aquifer Name Seasonal Variation
(Feet)
Long-term Trend in
water level data
Water level
measured during
well/pumping
maintenance
Well #1 208448 Jordan Sandstone
Mt. Simon
☐ Falling
☐ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well #2 603085 Prairie du Chien
Jordan
☐ Falling
☐ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Well #4 767874 Prairie du Chien
Jordan
☐ Falling
☐ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
☐ Falling
☐ Stable
☐ Rising
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
MM/DD/YY:____
Potential Water Supply Issues & Natural Resource Impacts – Key DNR & Metropolitan Council
Benchmark
Complete Table 10 by listing the types of natural resources that are or could potentially be impacted by
permitted water withdrawals in the future. You do not need to identify every single water resource in
your entire community. The goal is to help you triage the most important water resources and/or the
water resources that may be impacted by your water supply system – perhaps during a drought or when
the population has grown significantly in ten years. This is emerging science, so do the best you can with
available data. For identified resources, provide the name of specific resources that may be impacted.
Identify what the greatest risks to the resource are and how the risks are being assessed. Identify any
resource protection thresholds – formal or informal – that have been established to identify when
actions should be taken to mitigate impacts. Provide information about the potential mitigation actions
that may be taken, if a resource protection threshold is crossed. Add additional rows to the table as
needed. See the glossary at the end of the template for definitions.
16
Some of this baseline data should have been in your earlier water supply plans or county comprehensive
water plans. When filling out this table, think of what are the water supply risks, identify the resources,
determine the threshold and then determine what your community will do to mitigate the impacts.
Your DNR area hydrologist is available to assist with this table.
For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, the Master Water Supply Plan
Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles), provides information about potential water supply issues and
natural resource impacts for your community.
Steps for completing Table 10
1. Identify the potential for natural resource impacts/issues within the community
First, review available information to identify resources that may be impacted by the operation
of your water supply system (such as pumping).
Potential Sources of Information:
• County Geologic Atlas
• Local studies
• Metropolitan Council System Statement (for metro communities)
• Metropolitan Council Master Water Supply Plan (for metro communities)
ACTION: Check the resource type(s) that may be impacted in the column “Resource Type”
2. Identify where your water supply system is most likely to impact those resources (and
vice versa).
Potential Sources of Information:
• Drinking Water Supply Management Areas
• Geologic Atlas - Sensitivity
• If no WHPA or other information exists, consider rivers, lakes, wetlands and significant
within 1.5 miles of wells; and calcareous fens and trout streams within 5 miles of wells
ACTION: Focus the rest of your work in these areas.
3. Within focus areas, identify specific features of value to the community
You know your community best. What resources are important to pay attention to? It may be
useful to check in with your community’s planning and zoning staff and others.
Potential Sources of Information:
• Park plans
• Local studies
• Natural resource inventories
• Tourist attractions/recreational areas/valued community resource
ACTION: Identify specific features that the community prioritizes in the “Resource Name”
column (for example: North Lake, Long River, Brook Trout Stream, or Green Fen). If, based on a
review of available information, no features are likely to be at risk, note “None”.
4. Identify what impact(s) the resource is at risk for
17
Potential Sources of Information:
• Wellhead Protection Plan
• Water Appropriation Permit
• County Geologic Atlas
• MDH or PCA reports of the area
• Metropolitan Council System Statement (for metro communities)
• Metropolitan Council Master Water Supply Plan (for metro communities)
ACTION: Check the risk type in the column “Risk”. If, based on a review of available information,
no risk is identified, note “None anticipated”.
5. Describe how the risk was assessed
Potential Sources of Information:
• Local studies
• Monitoring data (community, WMO, DNR, etc.)
• Aquifer testing
• County Geologic Atlas or other hydrogeologic studies
• Regional or state studies, such as DNR’s report ‘Definitions and Thresholds for Negative
Impacts to Surface Waters’
• Well boring logs
ACTION: Identify the method(s) used to identify the risk to the resource in the “Risk Assessed
Through” column
6. Describe protection threshold/goals
What is the goal, if any, for protecting these resources? For example, is there a lower limit on
acceptable flow in a river or stream? Water quality outside of an accepted range? A lower limit
on acceptable aquifer level decline at one or more monitoring wells? Withdrawals that exceed
some percent of the total amount available from a source? Or a lower limit on acceptable
changes to a protected habitat?
Potential Sources of Information:
• County Comprehensive Water Plans
• Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan
• Groundwater or Aquifer Plans
• Metropolitan Master Plans
• DNR Thresholds study
• Community parks, open space, and natural resource plans
ACTION: Describe resource protection goals in the “Describe Resource Protection Threshold”
column or reference an existing plan/document/webpage
7. If a goal/threshold should trigger action, describe the plan that will be implemented.
Identify specific action, mitigation measures or management plan that the water supplier will
implement, or refer to a partner’s plan that includes actions to be taken.
Potential Sources of Information:
• County Comprehensive Water Plans
18
• Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan
• Groundwater or Aquifer Plans
• Metropolitan Master Plans
• Studies such as DNR Thresholds study
ACTION: Describe the mitigation measure or management plan in the “Mitigation Measure or
Management Plan” column.
8. Describe work to evaluate these risks going forward.
For example, what is the plan to regularly check in to stay current on plans or new data?
Identify specific action that the water supplier will take to identify the creation of or change to
goals/thresholds, or refer to a partner’s plan that includes actions to be taken.
Potential Sources of Information:
• County Comprehensive Water Plans
• Watershed Plans or One Watershed/One Plan
• Groundwater or Aquifer Plans
• Metropolitan Master Plans
• Studies such as DNR Thresholds study
ACTION: Describe what will be done to evaluate risks going forward, including any changes to
goals or protection thresholds in the “Describe how Changes to Goals are monitored” column.
19
Table 10. Natural resource impacts (*List specific resources in Appendix 12)
Resource
Type
Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through *
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold or
Goal *
Mitigation
Measures or
Management
Plan
Describe How
Thresholds or
Goals are
Monitored
☐ River or
stream
☒ None
anticipated
☐
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☐ Modeling
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
report
☐Proximity
(<1.5
miles)
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ No data
available
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☐ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☐ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
___________
_
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Calcareous
fen
☒ None
anticipated
☐
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☐ Modeling
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
Report
☐Proximity
(<5 miles)
☐ Other:
_________
☐ Other: ___
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☐ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☐ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
20
Resource
Type
Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through *
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold or
Goal *
Mitigation
Measures or
Management
Plan
Describe How
Thresholds or
Goals are
Monitored
☒ Lake
White Bear
Lake
☐ None
anticipated
☒
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☒ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☒ Modeling
☐ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
report
☐Proximity
(<1.5
miles)
☐ Other:
_________
☐ Other: ___
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☐ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☒ Lake
Lake Elmo
Lake
Demontreville
Olson Lake
Lake Jane
Sunfish Lake
☐ None
anticipated
☒
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☐ Modeling
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
report
☐Proximity
(<1.5
miles)
☐ Other:
_________
☐ Other: ___
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☒ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
Valley Branch
Watershed
District
☐ Other:
___________
21
Resource
Type
Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through *
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold or
Goal *
Mitigation
Measures or
Management
Plan
Describe How
Thresholds or
Goals are
Monitored
☒ Wetlands
Clear Lake
subwatershed
wetlands
Goetchel
Pond
subwatershed
wetlands
Lake Jane
subwatershed
wetlands
☐ None
anticipated
☒
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☐ Modeling
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
report
☐Proximity
(<1.5
miles)
☐ Other:
_________
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☒ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
Valley Branch
Watershed
District
☐ Other:
___________
☒ Trout
stream
Brown’s Creek ☐ None
anticipated
☒
Flow/water
level decline
☐ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☐ Modeling
☒ Monitoring
☐ Aquifer
testing
☐WRAPS or
other
watershed
report
☐Proximity
(< 5 miles)
☒ Other:
Monitor water
levels from Lake
Elmo wells
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☒ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☐ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
22
Resource
Type
Resource
Name
Risk Risk Assessed
Through *
Describe
Resource
Protection
Threshold or
Goal *
Mitigation
Measures or
Management
Plan
Describe How
Thresholds or
Goals are
Monitored
☒ Aquifer
Jordan
Aquifer
3M Plume
☐ None
anticipated
☒
Flow/water
level decline
☒ Degrading
water quality
trends
☐ Impacts on
endangered,
threatened,
or special
concern
species
habitat
☐ Other:
___________
☐ Geologic
atlas or other
mapping
☒ Modeling
☒ Monitoring
☒ Aquifer
testing
☐Proximity
(obwell < 5
miles)
☒ Other:
Monitor water
levels from new
observation
well to be
constructed
with Well #6
☐ Not
applicable
☐ Additional
data is
needed to
establish
☐ See report:
___________
☐ Other:
___________
☐Not
applicable
☐ Change
groundwater
pumping
☐ Increase
conservation
☒ Other:
New water level
observation
well to be
constructed
with Well #6
☐Not
applicable
☒ Newly
collected data
will be
analyzed
☒ Regular
check-in with
these
partners:
MPCA; MDH,
and DNR
☐ Other:
___________
Wellhead Protection (WHP) and Source Water Protection (SWP) Plans
Complete Table 11 to provide status information about WHP and SWP plans.
The emergency procedures in this plan are intended to comply with the contingency plan provisions
required in the Minnesota Department of Health’s (MDH) Wellhead Protection (WHP) Plan and Surface
Water Protection (SWP) Plan.
Table 11. Status of Wellhead Protection and Source Water Protection Plans
Plan Type Status Date Adopted Date for Update
WHP ☒ In Process
☐ Completed
☐ Not Applicable
SWP ☐ In Process
☐ Completed
☒ Not Applicable
WHP – Wellhead Protection Plan SWP – Source Water Protection Plan
F. Capital Improvement Plan (CIP)
Please note that any wells that received approval under a ten-year permit, but that were not built, are
now expired and must submit a water appropriations permit.
Adequacy of Water Supply System
Complete Table 12 with information about the adequacy of wells and/or intakes, storage facilities,
treatment facilities, and distribution systems to sustain current and projected demands. List planned
23
capital improvements for any system components, in chronological order. Communities in the seven-
county Twin Cities metropolitan area should also include information about plans through 2040.
The assessment can be the general status by category; it is not necessary to identify every single well,
storage facility, treatment facility, lift station, and mile of pipe.
Please attach your latest Capital Improvement Plan as Appendix 4.
Table 12. Adequacy of Water Supply System
System Component Planned action Anticipated
Construction
Year
Notes
Wells/Intakes
Have 4 wells (2 active)
3 additional wells are in CIP
☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
Well #5: 2020
Well #6: 2023
Well #7: 2030
Jordan Aquifer
monitoring well
construction: 2023
Water Storage Facilities
Have 3
1 additional are in CIP
☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
WT#3: 2021
Inactivate Water
Tower #1 with
WT#3 in 2021
Water Treatment Facilities
☒ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☐ Expansion/addition
Treatment for
PFAS may be
required at future
date
Distribution Systems
(Pipes, valves, etc.)
☐ No action planned - adequate
☒ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
*Old Village
Water and Sewer
replacement in
2021, 2022, and
2023
*New lateral
watermains will
be extended to
20 existing
neighborhoods
with PFAS
between 2020-
2025.
New trunk mains
will be constructed
with each new
well and for new
developments
Pressure Zones
Interconnect south intermediate pressure zone
to low pressure zone
☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☒ Expansion/addition
2020 and
2021
Other: ☐ No action planned - adequate
☐ Repair/replacement
☐ Expansion/addition
24
Proposed Future Water Sources
Complete Table 13 to identify new water source installation planned over the next ten years. Add rows
to the table as needed.
Table 13. Proposed future installations/sources
Source Installation
Location
(approximate)
Resource
Name
Proposed
Pumping
Capacity (gpm)
Planned
Installation Year
Planned
Partnerships
Groundwater Well #5 (Tana
Ridge Park 50th
Street and Lily
Avenue)
Jordan
Aquifer
1250 gpm 2020
Groundwater Well #6 +
monitoring well
(Keats Avenue and
59th Street)
Jordan
Aquifer
1000 gpm 2023
Groundwater Well #7
(Keats Avenue and
59th Street)
Jordan
Aquifer
1000 gpm 2030
Surface Water
Interconnection
to another
supplier
No new
interconnects are
anticipated
NOTE: The above listed future planned wells are consistent with Lake Elmo’s comprehensive water system planning efforts to
address safe drinking water for Lake Elmo users through 2040 in the most cost-effective manner (without treatment). However,
the City of Lake Elmo understands there are potential challenges to this plan due to PFAS plumes in the area and potential
impacts to White Bear Lake. Lake Elmo is therefore actively working with the MDH, MPCA, DNR and East Metro 3M Settlement
Workgroups to define a safe and sustainable drinking water supply through 2040. The studies are ongoing and include
reviewing options for community interconnects with Oakdale and Woodbury, regional water supply systems using groundwater
and/or surface water, Lake Elmo groundwater wells with PFAS treatment, and other potential combination of options.
Water Source Alternatives - Key Metropolitan Council Benchmark
Do you anticipate the need for alternative water sources in the next 10 years? (see Note in Table 13)
Yes ☐ No ☒
For metro communities, will you need alternative water sources by the year 2040? (see Note in Table 13)
Yes ☐ No ☒
If you answered yes for either question, then complete table 14. If no, insert NA.
Complete Table 14 by checking the box next to alternative approaches that your community is
considering, including approximate locations (if known), the estimated amount of future demand that
could be met through the approach, the estimated timeframe to implement the approach, potential
partnerships, and the major benefits and challenges of the approach. Add rows to the table as needed.
For communities in the seven-county Twin Cities metropolitan area, these alternatives should include
approaches the community is considering to meet projected 2040 water demand.
25
Table 14. Alternative water sources
Alternative Source
Considered
Source and/or
Installation
Location
(approximate)
Estimated
Amount of
Future
Demand (%)
Timeframe
to
Implement
(YYYY)
Potential
Partners
Benefits Challenges
☐ Groundwater
☐ Surface Water
☐ Reclaimed stormwater
☐ Reclaimed wastewater
☐ Interconnection to
another supplier
NOTE: Lake Elmo is actively working with the MDH, MPCA, DNR and East Metro 3M Settlement Workgroups to define a safe
and sustainable drinking water supply through 2040. The studies are ongoing and include reviewing options for community
interconnects with Oakdale and Woodbury, regional water supply systems using groundwater and/or surface water, Lake Elmo
groundwater wells with PFAS treatment, and other potential combination of options. The study timeframe is being driven by
the State of Minnesota but is expected to be completed in 2020 or 2021.
PART 2. EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS PROCEDURES
The emergency preparedness procedures outlined in this plan are intended to comply with the
contingency plan provisions required by MDH in the WHP and SWP. Water emergencies can occur as a
result of vandalism, sabotage, accidental contamination, mechanical problems, power failings, drought,
flooding, and other natural disasters. The purpose of emergency planning is to develop emergency
response procedures and to identify actions needed to improve emergency preparedness. In the case of
a municipality, these procedures should be in support of, and part of, an all-hazard emergency
operations plan. Municipalities that already have written procedures dealing with water emergencies
should review the following information and update existing procedures to address these water supply
protection measures.
A. Emergency Response Plan
Section 1433(b) of the Safe Drinking Water Act, (Public Law 107-188, Title IV- Drinking Water Security
and Safety) requires community water suppliers serving over 3,300 people to prepare an Emergency
Response Plan. MDH recommends that Emergency Response Plans are updated annually.
Do you have an Emergency Response Plan? Yes ☐ No ☒
Have you updated the Emergency Response Plan in the last year? Yes ☐ No ☒
When did you last update your Emergency Response Plan? ____________________
Complete Table 15 by inserting the noted information regarding your completed Emergency Response
Plan.
Table 15. Emergency Response Plan contact information
Emergency Response Plan Role Contact Person Contact Phone Number Contact Email
Emergency Response Lead
26
Emergency Response Plan Role Contact Person Contact Phone Number Contact Email
Alternate Emergency Response
Lead
B. Operational Contingency Plan
All utilities should have a written operational contingency plan that describes measures to be taken for
water supply mainline breaks and other common system failures as well as routine maintenance.
Do you have a written operational contingency plan? Yes ☐ No ☒
At a minimum, a water supplier should prepare and maintain an emergency contact list of contractors
and suppliers.
C. Emergency Response Procedures
Water suppliers must meet the requirements of MN Rules 4720.5280. Accordingly, the Minnesota
Department of Natural Resources (DNR) requires public water suppliers serving more than 1,000 people
to submit Emergency and Conservation Plans. Water emergency and conservation plans that have been
approved by the DNR, under provisions of Minnesota Statute 186 and Minnesota Rules, part 6115.0770,
will be considered equivalent to an approved WHP contingency plan.
Emergency Telephone List
Prepare and attach a list of emergency contacts, including the MN Duty Officer (1-800-422-0798), as
Appendix 5. An Emergency Contact List template is available at the MnDNR Water Supply Plans
webpage.
The list should include key utility and community personnel, contacts in adjacent water suppliers, and
appropriate local, state and federal emergency contacts. Please be sure to verify and update the
contacts on the emergency telephone list and date it. Thereafter, update on a regular basis (once a year
is recommended). In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification
and warning standard operating procedure maintained by the Emergency Manager for that community.
Responsibilities and services for each contact should be defined.
Current Water Sources and Service Area
Quick access to concise and detailed information on water sources, water treatment, and the
distribution system may be needed in an emergency. System operation and maintenance records should
be maintained in secured central and back-up locations so that the records are accessible for emergency
purposes. A detailed map of the system showing the treatment plants, water sources, storage facilities,
supply lines, interconnections, and other information that would be useful in an emergency should also
be readily available. It is critical that public water supplier representatives and emergency response
personnel communicate about the response procedures and be able to easily obtain this kind of
information both in electronic and hard copy formats (in case of a power outage).
Do records and maps exist? Yes ☒ No ☐
Can staff access records and maps from a central secured location in the event of an emergency?
27
Yes ☒ No ☐
Does the appropriate staff know where the materials are located?
Yes ☒ No ☐
Procedure for Augmenting Water Supplies
Complete Tables 16 – 17 by listing all available sources of water that can be used to augment or replace
existing sources in an emergency. Add rows to the tables as needed.
In the case of a municipality, this information should be contained in a notification and warning
standard operating procedure maintained by the warning point for that community. Municipalities are
encouraged to execute cooperative agreements for potential emergency water services and copies
should be included in Appendix 6. Outstate Communities may consider using nearby high capacity wells
(industry, golf course) as emergency water sources.
WSP should include information on any physical or chemical problems that may limit interconnections
to other sources of water. Approvals from the MDH are required for interconnections or the reuse of
water.
Table 16. Interconnections with other water supply systems to supply water in an emergency
Other Water
Supply System
Owner
Capacity (GPM
& MGD)
Note Any Limitations On
Use
List of services, equipment, supplies
available to respond
City of Oakdale (Hudson
Blvd) 1400 GPM ONLY PROVIDES WATER TO
LAKE ELMO’S HIGH SERVICE
PRESSURE ZONE
City of Oakdale (Ideal
Ave.) 607 GPM
GPM – Gallons per minute MGD – million gallons per day
Table 17. Utilizing surface water as an alternative source
Surface Water
Source Name
Capacity
(GPM)
Capacity
(MGD)
Treatment Needs Note Any Limitations
On Use
Insert name of
surface water
source here
Add rows as
needed
If not covered above, describe additional emergency measures for providing water (obtaining bottled
water, or steps to obtain National Guard services, etc.)
In the event of an emergency the city may choose to distribute bottled water to effected residents of utilize services
offered by the National Guard.
Allocation and Demand Reduction Procedures
28
Complete Table 18 by adding information about how decisions will be made to allocate water and
reduce demand during an emergency. Provide information for each customer category, including its
priority ranking, average day demand, and demand reduction potential for each customer category.
Modify the customer categories as needed, and add additional lines if necessary.
Water use categories should be prioritized in a way that is consistent with Minnesota Statutes 103G.261
(#1 is highest priority) as follows:
1. Water use for human needs such as cooking, cleaning, drinking, washing and waste disposal; use
for on-farm livestock watering; and use for power production that meets contingency
requirements.
2. Water use involving consumption of less than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private wells
or surface water intakes)
3. Water use for agricultural irrigation and processing of agricultural products involving
consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day (usually from private high-capacity wells or
surface water intakes)
4. Water use for power production above the use provided for in the contingency plan.
5. All other water use involving consumption of more than 10,000 gallons per day.
6. Nonessential uses – car washes, golf courses, etc.
Water used for human needs at hospitals, nursing homes and similar types of facilities should be
designated as a high priority to be maintained in an emergency. Lower priority uses will need to address
water used for human needs at other types of facilities such as hotels, office buildings, and
manufacturing plants. The volume of water and other types of water uses at these facilities must be
carefully considered. After reviewing the data, common sense should dictate local allocation priorities to
protect domestic requirements over certain types of economic needs. Water use for lawn sprinkling,
vehicle washing, golf courses, and recreation are legislatively considered non-essential.
Table 18. Water use priorities
Customer Category Allocation Priority
Average Daily Demand
(GDP)
Short-Term Emergency
Demand Reduction
Potential (GPD)
Residential 1 217,968
Institutional 2 1,279
Commercial 3 161,640
Industrial N/A 0
Irrigation 4 32,074 32,074
Wholesale 5 0
Non-Essential 6 0
TOTAL NA NA
GPD – Gallons per Day
Tip: Calculating Emergency Demand Reduction Potential
The emergency demand reduction potential for all uses will typically equal the difference between
maximum use (summer demand) and base use (winter demand). In extreme emergency situations,
lower priority water uses must be restricted or eliminated to protect priority domestic water
29
requirements. Emergency demand reduction potential should be based on average day demands for
customer categories within each priority class. Use the tables in Part 3 on water conservation to help
you determine strategies.
Complete Table 19 by selecting the triggers and actions during water supply disruption conditions.
30
Table 19. Emergency demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions (Select all that may apply and describe)
Emergency Triggers Short-term Actions Long-term Actions
☒ Contamination
☒ Loss of production
☒ Infrastructure failure
☐ Executive order by
Governor
☐ Other: _____________
☒ Supply augmentation through
distribution valve configuration
or City of Oakdale.
☒ Adopt (if not already) and
enforce a critical water
deficiency ordinance to penalize
lawn watering, vehicle washing,
golf course and park irrigation &
other nonessential uses.
☐ Water allocation through____
☒ Meet with large water users to
discuss their contingency plan.
☒ Supply augmentation through
distribution valve configuration
or City of Oakdale.
☒ Adopt (if not already) and
enforce a critical water
deficiency ordinance to penalize
lawn watering, vehicle washing,
golf course and park irrigation &
other nonessential uses.
☐ Water allocation through____
☒ Meet with large water users to
discuss their contingency plan.
Notification Procedures
Complete Table 20 by selecting trigger for informing customers regarding conservation requests, water
use restrictions, and suspensions; notification frequencies; and partners that may assist in the
notification process. Add rows to the table as needed.
Table 20. Plan to inform customers regarding conservation requests, water use restrictions, and suspensions
Notification
Trigger(s)
Methods (select all that apply) Update
Frequency
Partners
☒ Short-term
demand reduction
declared (< 1
year)
☒ Website
☐ Email list serve
☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☒ Direct customer mailing,
☒ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☐ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
☒ Daily
☐ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Annually
☒ Long-term
Ongoing demand
reduction
declared
☒ Website
☐ Email list serve
☒ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☒ Direct customer mailing,
☒ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☐ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
☐ Daily
☐ Weekly
☒ Monthly
☐ Annually
☐ Governor’s critical
water deficiency
declared
☐ Website
☐ Email list serve
☐ Social media (e.g. Twitter,
Facebook)
☐ Direct customer mailing,
☐ Daily
☐ Weekly
☐ Monthly
☐ Annually
31
Notification
Trigger(s)
Methods (select all that apply) Update
Frequency
Partners
☐ Press release (TV, radio,
newspaper),
☐ Meeting with large water users
(> 10% of total city use)
☐ Other: ________
Enforcement
Prior to a water emergency, municipal water suppliers must adopt regulations that restrict water use
and outline the enforcement response plan. The enforcement response plan must outline how
conditions will be monitored to know when enforcement actions are triggered, what enforcement tools
will be used, who will be responsible for enforcement, and what timelines for corrective actions will be
expected.
Affected operations, communications, and enforcement staff must then be trained to rapidly implement
those provisions during emergency conditions.
Important Note:
Disregard of critical water deficiency orders, even though total appropriation remains less than
permitted, is adequate grounds for immediate modification of a public water supply authority’s water
use permit (2013 MN Statutes 103G.291)
Does the city have a critical water deficiency restriction/official control in place that includes
provisions to restrict water use and enforce the restrictions? (This restriction may be an ordinance,
rule, regulation, policy under a council directive, or other official control) Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, attach the official control document to this WSP as Appendix 7.
If no, the municipality must adopt such an official control within 6 months of submitting this WSP and
submit it to the DNR as an amendment to this WSP.
Irrespective of whether a critical water deficiency control is in place, does the public water supply
utility, city manager, mayor, or emergency manager have standing authority to implement water
restrictions? Yes ☒ No ☐
If yes, cite the regulatory authority reference: __City Council or Mayor______________________.
If no, who has authority to implement water use restrictions in an emergency?
32
PART 3. WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
Minnesotans have historically benefited from the
state’s abundant water supplies, reducing the need
for conservation. There are however, limits to the
available supplies of water and increasing threats to
the quality of our drinking water. Causes of water
supply limitation may include: population increases,
economic trends, uneven statewide availability of
groundwater, climatic changes, and degraded water
quality. Examples of threats to drinking water quality
include: the presence of contaminant plumes from
past land use activities, exceedances of water quality
standards from natural and human sources,
contaminants of emerging concern, and increasing
pollutant trends from nonpoint sources.
There are many incentives for conserving water; conservation:
• reduces the potential for pumping-induced transfer of contaminants into the deeper aquifers,
which can add treatment costs
• reduces the need for capital projects to expand system capacity
• reduces the likelihood of water use conflicts, like well interference, aquatic habitat loss, and
declining lake levels
• conserves energy, because less energy is needed to extract, treat and distribute water (and less
energy production also conserves water since water is used to produce energy)
• maintains water supplies that can then be available during times of drought
It is therefore imperative that water suppliers implement water conservation plans. The first step in
water conservation is identifying opportunities for behavioral or engineering changes that could be
made to reduce water use by conducting a thorough analysis of:
• Water use by customer
• Extraction, treatment, distribution and irrigation system efficiencies
• Industrial processing system efficiencies
• Regulatory and barriers to conservation
• Cultural barriers to conservation
• Water reuse opportunities
Once accurate data is compiled, water suppliers can set achievable goals for reducing water use. A
successful water conservation plan follows a logical sequence of events. The plan should address both
conservation on the supply side (leak detection and repairs, metering), as well as on the demand side
(reductions in usage). Implementation should be conducted in phases, starting with the most obvious
and lowest-cost options. In some cases, one of the early steps will be reviewing regulatory constraints to
water conservation, such as lawn irrigation requirements. Outside funding and grants may be available
for implementation of projects. Engage water system operators and maintenance staff and customers
in brainstorming opportunities to reduce water use. Ask the question: “How can I help save water?”
Progress since 2006
Is this your community’s first Water Supply Plan? Yes ☒ No ☐
Priority 1:
Significant
water
reduction; low
cost
Priority 2: Slight
water
reduction, low
costs (low
hanging fruit)
Priority 2:
Significant
water
reduction;
significant costs
Priority 3: Slight
water
reduction,
significant costs
(do only if
necessary)
33
If yes, describe conservation practices that you are already implementing, such as: pricing, system
improvements, education, regulation, appliance retrofitting, enforcement, etc.
Tiered billing.
If no, complete Table 21 to summarize conservation actions taken since the adoption of the 2006 water
supply plan.
Table 21. Implementation of previous ten-year Conservation Plan
2006 Plan Commitments Action Taken?
Change water rates structure to provide conservation pricing ☒ Yes
☐ No
Water supply system improvements (e.g. leak repairs, valve replacements, etc.) ☒ Yes
☐ No
Educational efforts ☐ Yes
☒ No
New water conservation ordinances ☒ Yes
☐ No
Rebate or retrofitting Program (e.g. for toilet, faucets, appliances, showerheads, dish
washers, washing machines, irrigation systems, rain barrels, water softeners, etc.
☐ Yes
☒ No
Enforcement
☐ Yes
☐ No
Describe other ☐ Yes
☐ No
What are the results you have seen from the actions in Table 21 and how were results measured?
Results are unobtainable due to increased growth of city and expansion of the water system.
A. Triggers for Allocation and Demand Reduction Actions
Complete table 22 by checking each trigger below, as appropriate, and the actions to be taken at various
levels or stages of severity. Add in additional rows to the table as needed.
Table 22. Short and long-term demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions
Objective Triggers Actions
Protect surface water flows ☐ Low stream flow conditions ☐ Increase promotion of conservation
measures
34
Objective Triggers Actions
☐ Reports of declining
wetland and lake levels
☐ Other: ______________
☐ Other: ____________
Short-term demand reduction
(less than 1 year
☐ Extremely high seasonal
water demand (more than
double winter demand)
☐ Loss of treatment capacity
☐ Lack of water in storage
☐ State drought plan
☐ Well interference
☐ Other:
___________________
☐ Adopt (if not already) and enforce the
critical water deficiency ordinance to
restrict or prohibit lawn watering,
vehicle washing, golf course and park
irrigation & other nonessential uses.
☐ Supply augmentation through ____
☐ Water allocation through____
☐ Meet with large water users to discuss
user’s contingency plan.
Long-term demand reduction
(>1 year)
☐ Per capita demand
increasing
☐ Total demand increase
(higher population or more
industry). Water level in
well(s) below elevation of
_____
☐ Other: _____________
☐ Develop a critical water deficiency
ordinance that is or can be quickly
adopted to penalize lawn watering,
vehicle washing, golf course and park
irrigation & other nonessential uses.
☐ Enact a water waste ordinance that
targets overwatering (causing water to
flow off the landscape into streets,
parking lots, or similar), watering
impervious surfaces (streets, driveways
or other hardscape areas), and
negligence of known leaks, breaks, or
malfunctions.
☐ Meet with large water users to discuss
user’s contingency plan.
☐ Enhanced monitoring and reporting:
audits, meters, billing, etc.
Governor’s “Critical Water
Deficiency Order” declared
☐ Describe ☐ Describe
B. Conservation Objectives and Strategies – Key benchmark for DNR
This section establishes water conservation objectives and strategies for eight major areas of water use.
Objective 1: Reduce Unaccounted (Non-Revenue) Water loss to Less than 10%
The Minnesota Rural Water Association, the Metropolitan Council and the Department of Natural
Resources recommend that all water uses be metered. Metering can help identify high use locations
and times, along with leaks within buildings that have multiple meters.
It is difficult to quantify specific unmetered water use such as that associated with firefighting and
system flushing or system leaks. Typically, water suppliers subtract metered water use from total water
pumped to calculate unaccounted or non-revenue water loss.
Is your five-year average (2005-2014) unaccounted Water Use in Table 2 higher than 10%?
Yes ☐ No ☒
What is your leak detection monitoring schedule? (e.g. Monitor 1/3rd of the city lines per year)
35
Do leak detection on areas of the city that are scheduled for street reconstruction 2 years prior to
construction beginning. Create a plan to ¼ of the city every year.
Water Audits - are designed to help quantify and track water losses associated with water distribution
systems and identify areas for improved efficiency and cost recovery. The American Water Works
Association (AWWA) has a recommended water audit methodology which is presented in AWWA’s M36
Manual of Water Supply Practices: Water Audits and Loss Control Programs. AWWA also provides a free
spreadsheet-based water audit tool that water suppliers can use to conduct their own water audits. This
free water audit tool can be found on AWWA’s Water Loss Control webpage. Another resource for
water audit and water loss control information is Minnesota Rural Water Association.
What is the date of your most recent water audit? N/A
Frequency of water audits: ☐ yearly ☐ other (specify frequency) ________
Leak detection and survey: ☒ every year ☐ every other year ☐ periodic as needed
Year last leak detection survey completed: 2017
If Table 2 shows annual water losses over 10% or an increasing trend over time, describe what actions
will be taken to reach the <10% loss objective and within what timeframe
Metering -AWWA recommends that every water supplier install meters to account for all water taken
into its system, along with all water distributed from its system at each customer’s point of service. An
effective metering program relies upon periodic performance testing, repair, maintenance or
replacement of all meters. Drinking Water Revolving Loan Funds are available for purchase of new
meters when new plants are built. AWWA also recommends that water suppliers conduct regular water
audits to account for unmetered unbilled consumption, metered unbilled consumption and source
water and customer metering inaccuracies. Some cities install separate meters for interior and exterior
water use, but some research suggests that this may not result in water conservation.
Complete Table 23 by adding the requested information regarding the number, types, testing and
maintenance of customer meters.
Table 23. Information about customer meters
Customer
Category
Number of
Customers
Number of
Metered
Connections
Number of
Automated
Meter
Readers
Meter testing
intervals
(years)
Average
age/meter
replacement
schedule (years
Residential 1610 1610 1610 When needed 20 years
Irrigation meters 24 24 24 When needed 20 years
Institutional 1 1 1 When needed 20 years
Commercial 112 112 112 When needed 20 years
36
Customer
Category
Number of
Customers
Number of
Metered
Connections
Number of
Automated
Meter
Readers
Meter testing
intervals
(years)
Average
age/meter
replacement
schedule (years
Industrial 0 0 0 NA 0
Public facilities 7 0 0 When needed 20 years
Other 0 0 0 NA 0
TOTALS 1754 1754 1754 NA NA
For unmetered systems, describe any plans to install meters or replace current meters with advanced
technology meters. Provide an estimate of the cost to implement the plan and the projected water
savings from implementing the plan.
Table 24. Water source meters
Number of
Meters
Meter testing
schedule
(years)
Number of Automated
Meter Readers
Average age/meter
replacement schedule (years
Wells 3 10 years 3 ___ / ___
Interconnects 2 unknown 2 ___ / ___
Objective 2: Achieve Less than 75 Residential Gallons per Capita Demand (GPCD)
The 2002 average residential per capita demand in the Twin Cities Metropolitan area was 75 gallons per
capita per day.
Is your average 2010-2015 residential per capita water demand in Table 2 more than 75? Yes ☐ No ☒
What was your 2010 – 2015 five-year average residential per capita water demand? 74 g/person/day
Describe the water use trend over that timeframe:
Varies, no consistent trend.
Complete Table 25 by checking which strategies you will use to continue reducing residential per capita
demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (Select all that apply and
add rows for additional strategies):
Table 25. Strategies and timeframe to reduce residential per capita demand
Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work
☒ Revise city ordinances/codes to encourage or require water
efficient landscaping.
Continuous, No water credit will be given for
new sod starting in 2018
☐ Revise city ordinance/codes to permit water reuse options,
especially for non-potable purposes like irrigation,
37
Strategy to reduce residential per capita demand Timeframe for completing work
groundwater recharge, and industrial use. Check with
plumbing authority to see if internal buildings reuse is
permitted
☒ Revise ordinances to limit irrigation. Describe the restricted
irrigation plan:
Reviewed annually
☐ Revise outdoor irrigation installations codes to require high
efficiency systems (e.g. those with soil moisture sensors or
programmable watering areas) in new installations or system
replacements.
☒ Make water system infrastructure improvements continuous
☐ Offer free or reduced cost water use audits) for residential
customers.
☐ Implement a notification system to inform customers when
water availability conditions change.
☐ Provide rebates or incentives for installing water efficient
appliances and/or fixtures indoors (e.g., low flow toilets, high
efficiency dish washers and washing machines, showerhead
and faucet aerators, water softeners, etc.)
☐ Provide rebates or incentives to reduce outdoor water use
(e.g., turf replacement/reduction, rain gardens, rain barrels,
smart irrigation, outdoor water use meters, etc.)
☐ Identify supplemental Water Resources
☐ Conduct audience-appropriate water conservation education
and outreach.
☐ Describe other plans
Objective 3: Achieve at least 1.5% annual reduction in non-residential per capita water use
(For each of the next ten years, or a 15% total reduction over ten years.) This includes commercial,
institutional, industrial and agricultural water users.
Complete Table 26 by checking which strategies you will used to continue reducing non-residential
customer use demand and project a likely timeframe for completing each checked strategy (add rows
for additional strategies).
Where possible, substitute recycled water used in one process for reuse in another. (For example, spent
rinse water can often be reused in a cooling tower.) Keep in mind the true cost of water is the amount
on the water bill PLUS the expenses to heat, cool, treat, pump, and dispose of/discharge the water.
Don’t just calculate the initial investment. Many conservation retrofits that appear to be prohibitively
expensive are actually very cost-effective when amortized over the life of the equipment. Often
reducing water use also saves electrical and other utility costs. Note: as of 2015, water reuse, and is not
allowed by the state plumbing code, M.R. 4715 (a variance is needed). However, several state agencies
are addressing this issue.
Table 26. Strategies and timeframe to reduce institutional, commercial industrial, and agricultural and non-revenue use
demand
Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work
☐ Conduct a facility water use audit for both indoor and outdoor
use, including system components
38
Strategy to reduce total business, industry, agricultural demand Timeframe for completing work
☒ Install enhanced meters capable of automated readings to
detect spikes in consumption
In process, completion expected in 5 years
☐ Compare facility water use to related industry benchmarks, if
available (e.g., meat processing, dairy, fruit and vegetable,
beverage, textiles, paper/pulp, metals, technology, petroleum
refining etc.)
☐ Install water conservation fixtures and appliances or change
processes to conserve water
☒ Repair leaking system components (e.g., pipes, valves) continuous
☐ Investigate the reuse of reclaimed water (e.g., stormwater,
wastewater effluent, process wastewater, etc.)
☒ Reduce outdoor water use (e.g., turf replacement/reduction,
rain gardens, rain barrels, smart irrigation, outdoor water use
meters, etc.)
continuous
☒ Train employees how to conserve water continuous
☒ Implement a notification system to inform non-residential
customers when water availability conditions change.
CodeRed call system
☐ Nonpotable rainwater catchment systems intended to supply
uses such as water closets, urinals, trap primers for floor
drains and floor sinks, industrial processes, water features,
vehicle washing facilities, cooling tower makeup, and similar
uses shall be approved by the commissioner. Plumbing code
4714.1702, Published October 31, 2016
☐ Describe other plans:
Objective 4: Achieve a Decreasing Trend in Total Per Capita Demand
Include as Appendix 8 one graph showing total per capita water demand for each customer category
(i.e., residential, institutional, commercial, industrial) from 2005-2014 and add the calculated/estimated
linear trend for the next 10 years.
Describe the trend for each customer category; explain the reason(s) for the trends, and where trends
are increasing.
Objective 5: Reduce Ratio of Maximum day (peak day) to the Average Day Demand to Less
Than 2.6
Is the ratio of average 2005-2014 maximum day demand to average 2005-2014 average day demand
reported in Table 2 more than 2.6? Yes ☐ No ☒
Calculate a ten-year average (2005 – 2014) of the ratio of maximum day demand to average day
demand: 3:1
39
The position of the DNR has been that a peak day/average day ratio that is above 2.6 for in summer
indicates that the water being used for irrigation by the residents in a community is too large and that
efforts should be made to reduce the peak day use by the community.
It should be noted that by reducing the peak day use, communities can also reduce the amount of
infrastructure that is required to meet the peak day use. This infrastructure includes new wells, new
water towers which can be costly items.
Objective 6: Implement Demand Reduction Measures
Water Conservation Program
Municipal water suppliers serving over 1,000 people are required to adopt demand reduction measures
that include a conservation rate structure, or a uniform rate structure with a conservation program that
achieves demand reduction. These measures must achieve demand reduction in ways that reduce
water demand, water losses, peak water demands, and nonessential water uses. These measures must
be approved before a community may request well construction approval from the Department of
Health or before requesting an increase in water appropriations permit volume (Minnesota Statutes,
section 103G.291, subd. 3 and 4). Rates should be adjusted on a regular basis to ensure that revenue of
the system is adequate under reduced demand scenarios. If a municipal water supplier intends to use a
Uniform Rate Structure, a community-wide Water Conservation Program that will achieve demand
reduction must be provided.
Current Water Rates
Include a copy of the actual rate structure in Appendix 9 or list current water rates including
base/service fees and volume charges below.
Volume included in base rate or service charge: __0___ gallons or ____ cubic feet ___ other
Frequency of billing: ☐ Monthly ☐ Bimonthly ☒ Quarterly ☐ Other: _________________
Water Rate Evaluation Frequency: ☒ every year ☐ every ___ years ☐ no schedule
Date of last rate change: 4/1/17
Table 27. Rate structures for each customer category (Select all that apply and add additional rows as needed)
Customer
Category
Conservation Billing Strategies
in Use *
Conservation Neutral
Billing Strategies in Use **
Non-Conserving Billing
Strategies in Use ***
Residential ☐ Monthly billing
☒ Increasing block rates
(volume tiered rates)
☐ Seasonal rates
☐ Time of use rates
☒ Water bills reported in
gallons
☐ Individualized goal rates
☐ Excess use rates
☐ Uniform
☒ Odd/even day watering
☐ Service charge based on water
volume
☐ Declining block
☐ Flat
☐ Other (describe)
40
Customer
Category
Conservation Billing Strategies
in Use *
Conservation Neutral
Billing Strategies in Use **
Non-Conserving Billing
Strategies in Use ***
☐ Drought surcharge
☐ Use water bill to provide
comparisons
☒ Service charge not based on
water volume
☐ Other (describe)
Commercial/
Industrial/
Institutional
☐ Monthly billing
☒ Increasing block rates
(volume tiered rates)
☐ Seasonal rates
☐ Time of use rates
☒ Water bills reported in
gallons
☐ Individualized goal rates
☐ Excess use rates
☐ Drought surcharge
☐ Use water bill to provide
comparisons
☒ Service charge not based on
water volume
☐ Other (describe)
☐ Uniform ☐ Service charge based on water
volume
☐ Declining block
☐ Flat
☐ Other (describe)
☐ Other
* Rate Structures components that may promote water conservation:
• Monthly billing: is encouraged to help people see their water usage so they can consider changing
behavior.
• Increasing block rates (also known as a tiered residential rate structure): Typically, these have at least
three tiers: should have at least three tiers.
o The first tier is for the winter average water use.
o The second tier is the year-round average use, which is lower than typical summer use. This rate
should be set to cover the full cost of service.
o The third tier should be above the average annual use and should be priced high enough to
encourage conservation, as should any higher tiers. For this to be effective, the difference in
block rates should be significant.
• Seasonal rate: higher rates in summer to reduce peak demands
• Time of Use rates: lower rates for off peak water use
• Bill water use in gallons: this allows customers to compare their use to average rates
• Individualized goal rates: typically used for industry, business or other large water users to promote
water conservation if they keep within agreed upon goals. Excess Use rates: if water use goes above an
agreed upon amount this higher rate is charged
• Drought surcharge: an extra fee is charged for guaranteed water use during drought
• Use water bill to provide comparisons: simple graphics comparing individual use over time or compare
individual use to others.
• Service charge or base fee that does not include a water volume – a base charge or fee to cover universal
city expenses that are not customer dependent and/or to provide minimal water at a lower rate (e.g., an
amount less than the average residential per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years)
• Emergency rates -A community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when
the community or governor declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city
budgets during times of significantly less water usage.
41
**Conservation Neutral**
• Uniform rate: rate per unit used is the same regardless of the volume used
• Odd/even day watering –This approach reduces peak demand on a daily basis for system operation, but
it does not reduce overall water use.
*** Non-Conserving ***
• Service charge or base fee with water volume: an amount of water larger than the average residential
per capita demand for the water supplier for the last 5 years
• Declining block rate: the rate per unit used decreases as water use increases.
• Flat rate: one fee regardless of how much water is used (usually unmetered).
Provide justification for any conservation neutral or non-conserving rate structures. If intending to adopt
a conservation rate structure, include the timeframe to do so:
Objective 7: Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use and Support Wellhead Protection
Planning
Development and redevelopment projects can provide additional water conservation opportunities,
such as the actions listed below. If a Uniform Rate Structure is in place, the water supplier must provide
a Water Conservation Program that includes at least two of the actions listed below. Check those actions
that you intent to implement within the next 10 years.
Table 28. Additional strategies to Reduce Water Use & Support Wellhead Protection
☒ Participate in the GreenStep Cities Program, including implementation of at least one of the 20
“Best Practices” for water
☒ Prepare a master plan for smart growth (compact urban growth that avoids sprawl)
☒ Prepare a comprehensive open space plan (areas for parks, green spaces, natural areas)
☒ Adopt a water use restriction ordinance (lawn irrigation, car washing, pools, etc.)
☒ Adopt an outdoor lawn irrigation ordinance
☐ Adopt a private well ordinance (private wells in a city must comply with water restrictions)
☒ Implement a stormwater management program
☐ Adopt non-zoning wetlands ordinance (can further protect wetlands beyond state/federal laws-
for vernal pools, buffer areas, restrictions on filling or alterations)
☐ Adopt a water offset program (primarily for new development or expansion)
☐ Implement a water conservation outreach program
☐ Hire a water conservation coordinator (part-time)
☐ Implement a rebate program for water efficient appliances, fixtures, or outdoor water
management
☐ Other
Objective 8: Tracking Success: How will you track or measure success through the next ten
years?
Documentation. This will be difficult to achieve due to planned growth of the city and infrastructure.
42
Tip: The process to monitor demand reduction and/or a rate structure includes:
a) The DNR Hydrologist will call or visit the community the first 1-3 years after the water supply plan is
completed.
b) They will discuss what activities the community is doing to conserve water and if they feel their
actions are successful. The Water Supply Plan, Part 3 tables and responses will guide the discussion.
For example, they will discuss efforts to reduce unaccounted for water loss if that is a problem, or go
through Tables 33, 34 and 35 to discuss new initiatives.
c) The city representative and the hydrologist will discuss total per capita water use, residential per
capita water use, and business/industry use. They will note trends.
d) They will also discuss options for improvement and/or collect case studies of success stories to share
with other communities. One option may be to change the rate structure, but there are many other
paths to successful water conservation.
e) If appropriate, they will cooperatively develop a simple work plan for the next few years, targeting a
couple areas where the city might focus efforts.
C. Regulation
Complete Table 29 by selecting which regulations are used to reduce demand and improve water
efficiencies. Add additional rows as needed.
Copies of adopted regulations or proposed restrictions or should be included in Appendix 10 (a list with
hyperlinks is acceptable).
Table 29. Regulations for short-term reductions in demand and long-term improvements in water efficiencies
Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)?
☒ Rainfall sensors required on landscape irrigation systems ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☒ Water efficient plumbing fixtures required ☒ New development
☐ Replacement
☐ Rebate Programs
☐ Critical/Emergency Water Deficiency ordinance ☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☒ Watering restriction requirements (time of day, allowable days, etc.) ☒ Odd/even
☐ 2 days/week
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☐ Water waste prohibited (for example, having a fine for irrigators
spraying on the street)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☒ Limitations on turf areas (requiring lots to have 10% - 25% of the
space in natural areas)
☒ New development
☒ Shoreland/zoning
☐ Other
☐ Soil preparation requirement s (after construction, requiring topsoil
to be applied to promote good root growth)
☐ New Development
☐ Construction Projects
☐ Other
☒ Tree ratios (requiring a certain number of trees per square foot of
lawn)
☒ New development
☒ Shoreland/zoning
☐ Other
43
Regulations Utilized When is it applied (in effect)?
☐ Permit to fill swimming pool and/or requiring pools to be covered (to
prevent evaporation)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during declared Emergencies
☐ Ordinances that permit stormwater irrigation, reuse of water, or
other alternative water use (Note: be sure to check current plumbing
codes for updates)
☐ Describe
D. Retrofitting Programs
Education and incentive programs aimed at replacing inefficient plumbing fixtures and appliances can
help reduce per capita water use, as well as energy costs. It is recommended that municipal water
suppliers develop a long-term plan to retrofit public buildings with water efficient plumbing fixtures and
appliances. Some water suppliers have developed partnerships with organizations having similar
conservation goals, such as electric or gas suppliers, to develop cooperative rebate and retrofit
programs.
A study by the AWWA Research Foundation (Residential End Uses of Water, 1999) found that the
average indoor water use for a non-conserving home is 69.3 gallons per capita per day (gpcd). The
average indoor water use in a conserving home is 45.2 gpcd and most of the decrease in water use is
related to water efficient plumbing fixtures and appliances that can reduce water, sewer and energy
costs. In Minnesota, certain electric and gas providers are required (Minnesota Statute 216B.241) to
fund programs that will conserve energy resources and some utilities have distributed water efficient
showerheads to customers to help reduce energy demands required to supply hot water.
Retrofitting Programs
Complete Table 30 by checking which water uses are targeted, the outreach methods used, the
measures used to identify success, and any participating partners.
Table 30. Retrofitting programs (Select all that apply)
Water Use Targets Outreach Methods Partners
☐ Low flush toilets,
☐ Toilet leak tablets,
☐ Low flow showerheads,
☐ Faucet aerators;
☐ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☐ Watershed organization
☐ Water conserving washing machines,
☐ Dish washers,
☐ Water softeners;
☐ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☐ Watershed organization
☒ Rain gardens,
☒ Rain barrels,
☒ Native/drought tolerant landscaping, etc.
☒ Education about
☐ Free distribution of
☐ Rebate for
☐ Other
☐ Gas company
☐ Electric company
☒ Watershed organization
Briefly discuss measures of success from the above table (e.g. number of items distributed, dollar value
of rebates, gallons of water conserved, etc.):
44
E. Education and Information Programs
Customer education should take place in three different circumstances. First, customers should be
provided information on how to conserve water and improve water use efficiencies. Second,
information should be provided at appropriate times to address peak demands. Third, emergency
notices and educational materials about how to reduce water use should be available for quick
distribution during an emergency.
Proposed Education Programs
Complete Table 31 by selecting which methods are used to provide water conservation and information,
including the frequency of program components. Select all that apply and add additional lines as
needed.
Table 31. Current and Proposed Education Programs
Education Methods General summary of
topics
#/Year Frequency
Billing inserts or tips printed on the actual bill ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Consumer Confidence Reports 1 ☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Press releases to traditional local news
outlets (e.g., newspapers, radio and TV)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Social media distribution (e.g., emails,
Facebook, Twitter)
Facebook is used to help
spread time sensitive
materials that have not
reached the emergency
level.
☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Paid advertisements (e.g., billboards, print
media, TV, radio, web sites, etc.)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Presentations to community groups ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Staff training MN Dept of Health
Operator Certification
Program for PW Staff
☒ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
45
Education Methods General summary of
topics
#/Year Frequency
Facility tours ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Displays and exhibits ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Marketing rebate programs (e.g., indoor
fixtures & appliances and outdoor practices)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Community news letters Article related to water
conservation will be
included in bi-annual
newsletters
2 ☐ Ongoing
☒ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Direct mailings (water audit/retrofit kits,
showerheads, brochures)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Information kiosk at utility and public
buildings
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Public service announcements ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Cable TV Programs ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Demonstration projects (landscaping or
plumbing)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
K-12 education programs (Project Wet,
Drinking Water Institute, presentations)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Community events (children’s water festivals,
environmental fairs)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
46
Education Methods General summary of
topics
#/Year Frequency
Community education classes ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Water week promotions ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Website (include address: ) ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Targeted efforts (large volume users, users
with large increases)
☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Notices of ordinances ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Emergency conservation notices ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Other: ☐ Ongoing
☐ Seasonal
☐ Only during
declared emergencies
Briefly discuss what future education and information activities your community is considering in the
future:
Utilize new created Social Media pages, Weekly e-mail updates and Quarterly Newsletter
47
PART 4. ITEMS FOR METROPOLITAN AREA COMMUNITIES
Minnesota Statute 473.859 requires WSPs to be completed for all local units of
government in the seven-county Metropolitan Area as part of the local
comprehensive planning process.
Much of the information in Parts 1-3 addresses water demand for the next 10
years. However, additional information is needed to address water demand
through 2040, which will make the WSP consistent with the Metropolitan Land Use Planning Act, upon
which the local comprehensive plans are based.
This Part 4 provides guidance to complete the WSP in a way that addresses plans for water supply
through 2040.
A. Water Demand Projections through 2040
Complete Table 7 in Part 1D by filling in information about long-term water demand projections through
2040. Total Community Population projections should be consistent with the community’s system
statement, which can be found on the Metropolitan Council’s website and which was sent to the
community in September 2015.
Projected Average Day, Maximum Day, and Annual Water Demands may either be calculated using the
method outlined in Appendix 2 of the 2015 Master Water Supply Plan or by a method developed by the
individual water supplier.
B. Potential Water Supply Issues
Complete Table 10 in Part 1E by providing information about the potential water supply issues in your
community, including those that might occur due to 2040 projected water use.
The Master Water Supply Plan provides information about potential issues for your community in
Appendix 1 (Water Supply Profiles). This resource may be useful in completing Table 10.
You may document results of local work done to evaluate impact of planned uses by attaching a
feasibility assessment or providing a citation and link to where the plan is available electronically.
C. Proposed Alternative Approaches to Meet Extended Water Demand
Projections
Complete Table 12 in Part 1F with information about potential water supply infrastructure impacts (such
as replacements, expansions or additions to wells/intakes, water storage and treatment capacity,
distribution systems, and emergency interconnections) of extended plans for development and
redevelopment, in 10-year increments through 2040. It may be useful to refer to information in the
community’s local Land Use Plan, if available.
Complete Table 14 in Part 1F by checking each approach your community is considering to meet future
demand. For each approach your community is considering, provide information about the amount of
48
future water demand to be met using that approach, the timeframe to implement the approach,
potential partners, and current understanding of the key benefits and challenges of the approach.
As challenges are being discussed, consider the need for: evaluation of geologic conditions (mapping,
aquifer tests, modeling), identification of areas where domestic wells could be impacted, measurement
and analysis of water levels & pumping rates, triggers & associated actions to protect water levels, etc.
D. Value-Added Water Supply Planning Efforts (Optional)
The following information is not required to be completed as part of the local water supply plan, but
completing this can help strengthen source water protection throughout the region and help
Metropolitan Council and partners in the region to better support local efforts.
Source Water Protection Strategies
Does a Drinking Water Supply Management Area for a neighboring public water supplier overlap your
community? Yes ☒ No ☐
If you answered no, skip this section. If you answered yes, please complete Table 32 with information
about new water demand or land use planning-related local controls that are being considered to
provide additional protection in this area.
Table 32. Local controls and schedule to protect Drinking Water Supply Management Areas
Local Control Schedule to
Implement
Potential Partners
☐ None at this time
☐ Comprehensive planning that guides development in
vulnerable drinking water supply management areas
☐ Zoning overlay
☒ Other: 2018 Well Head Protection Plan 2018 Mn Rural Water
Technical assistance
From your community’s perspective, what are the most important topics for the Metropolitan Council to
address, guided by the region’s Metropolitan Area Water Supply Advisory Committee and Technical
Advisory Committee, as part of its ongoing water supply planning role?
☒ Coordination of state, regional and local water supply planning roles
☒ Regional water use goals
☐ Water use reporting standards
☐ Regional and sub-regional partnership opportunities
☐ Identifying and prioritizing data gaps and input for regional and sub-regional analyses
☐ Others: ___________________________________________________________________
49
GLOSSARY
Agricultural/Irrigation Water Use - Water used for crop and non-crop irrigation, livestock watering, chemigation,
golf course irrigation, landscape and athletic field irrigation.
Average Daily Demand - The total water pumped during the year divided by 365 days.
Calcareous Fen - Calcareous fens are rare and distinctive wetlands dependent on a constant supply of cold
groundwater. Because they are dependent on groundwater and are one of the rarest natural communities in the
United States, they are a protected resource in MN. Approximately 200 have been located in Minnesota. They may
not be filled, drained or otherwise degraded.
Commercial/Institutional Water Use - Water used by motels, hotels, restaurants, office buildings, commercial
facilities and institutions (both civilian and military). Consider maintaining separate institutional water use records
for emergency planning and allocation purposes. Water used by multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings,
senior housing complexes, and mobile home parks should be reported as Residential Water Use.
Commercial/Institutional/Industrial (C/I/I) Water Sold - The sum of water delivered for commercial/institutional
or industrial purposes.
Conservation Rate Structure - A rate structure that encourages conservation and may include increasing block
rates, seasonal rates, time of use rates, individualized goal rates, or excess use rates. If a conservation rate is
applied to multifamily dwellings, the rate structure must consider each residential unit as an individual user. A
community may have a separate conservation rate that only goes into effect when the community or governor
declares a drought emergency. These higher rates can help to protect the city budgets during times of significantly
less water usage.
Date of Maximum Daily Demand - The date of the maximum (highest) water demand. Typically this is a day in July
or August.
Declining Rate Structure - Under a declining block rate structure, a consumer pays less per additional unit of water
as usage increases. This rate structure does not promote water conservation.
Distribution System - Water distribution systems consist of an interconnected series of pipes, valves, storage
facilities (water tanks, water towers, reservoirs), water purification facilities, pumping stations, flushing hydrants,
and components that convey drinking water and meeting fire protection needs for cities, homes, schools,
hospitals, businesses, industries and other facilities.
Flat Rate Structure - Flat fee rates do not vary by customer characteristics or water usage. This rate structure does
not promote water conservation.
Industrial Water Use - Water used for thermonuclear power (electric utility generation) and other industrial use
such as steel, chemical and allied products, paper and allied products, mining, and petroleum refining.
Low Flow Fixtures/Appliances - Plumbing fixtures and appliances that significantly reduce the amount of water
released per use are labeled “low flow”. These fixtures and appliances use just enough water to be effective,
saving excess, clean drinking water that usually goes down the drain.
Maximum Daily Demand - The maximum (highest) amount of water used in one day.
Metered Residential Connections - The number of residential connections to the water system that have meters.
For multifamily dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user.
Percent Unmetered/Unaccounted For - Unaccounted for water use is the volume of water withdrawn from all
sources minus the volume of water delivered. This value represents water “lost” by miscalculated water use due to
inaccurate meters, water lost through leaks, or water that is used but unmetered or otherwise undocumented.
Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, and public swimming pools should be
reported under the category “Water Supplier Services”.
50
Population Served - The number of people who are served by the community’s public water supply system. This
includes the number of people in the community who are connected to the public water supply system, as well as
people in neighboring communities who use water supplied by the community’s public water supply system. It
should not include residents in the community who have private wells or get their water from neighboring water
supply.
Residential Connections - The total number of residential connections to the water system. For multifamily
dwellings, report each residential unit as an individual user.
Residential Per Capita Demand - The total residential water delivered during the year divided by the population
served divided by 365 days.
Residential Water Use - Water used for normal household purposes such as drinking, food preparation, bathing,
washing clothes and dishes, flushing toilets, and watering lawns and gardens. Should include all water delivered to
single family private residences, multi-family dwellings, apartment buildings, senior housing complexes, mobile
home parks, etc.
Smart Meter - Smart meters can be used by municipalities or by individual homeowners. Smart metering generally
indicates the presence of one or more of the following:
• Smart irrigation water meters are controllers that look at factors such as weather, soil, slope, etc. and
adjust watering time up or down based on data. Smart controllers in a typical summer will reduce water
use by 30%-50%. Just changing the spray nozzle to new efficient models can reduce water use by 40%.
• Smart Meters on customer premises that measure consumption during specific time periods and
communicate it to the utility, often on a daily basis.
• A communication channel that permits the utility, at a minimum, to obtain meter reads on demand, to
ascertain whether water has recently been flowing through the meter and onto the premises, and to issue
commands to the meter to perform specific tasks such as disconnecting or restricting water flow.
Total Connections - The number of connections to the public water supply system.
Total Per Capita Demand - The total amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year
divided by the population served divided by 365 days.
Total Water Pumped - The cumulative amount of water withdrawn from all water supply sources during the year.
Total Water Delivered - The sum of residential, commercial, industrial, institutional, water supplier services,
wholesale and other water delivered.
Ultimate (Full Build-Out) - Time period representing the community’s estimated total amount and location of
potential development, or when the community is fully built out at the final planned density.
Unaccounted (Non-revenue) Loss - See definitions for “percent unmetered/unaccounted for loss”.
Uniform Rate Structure - A uniform rate structure charges the same price-per-unit for water usage beyond the
fixed customer charge, which covers some fixed costs. The rate sends a price signal to the customer because the
water bill will vary by usage. Uniform rates by class charge the same price-per-unit for all customers within a
customer class (e.g. residential or non-residential). This price structure is generally considered less effective in
encouraging water conservation.
Water Supplier Services - Water used for public services such as hydrant flushing, ice skating rinks, public
swimming pools, city park irrigation, back-flushing at water treatment facilities, and/or other uses.
Water Used for Nonessential Purposes - Water used for lawn irrigation, golf course and park irrigation, car
washes, ornamental fountains, and other non-essential uses.
Wholesale Deliveries - The amount of water delivered in bulk to other public water suppliers.
51
Acronyms and Initialisms
AWWA – American Water Works Association
C/I/I – Commercial/Institutional/Industrial
CIP – Capital Improvement Plan
GIS – Geographic Information System
GPCD – Gallons per capita per day
GWMA – Groundwater Management Area – North
and East Metro, Straight River, Bonanza,
MDH – Minnesota Department of Health
MGD – Million gallons per day
MG – Million gallons
MGL – Maximum Contaminant Level
MnTAP – Minnesota Technical Assistance Program
(University of Minnesota)
MPARS – MN/DNR Permitting and Reporting System
(new electronic permitting system)
MRWA – Minnesota Rural Waters Association
SWP – Source Water Protection
WHP – Wellhead Protection
APPENDICES TO BE SUBMITTED BY THE WATER SUPPLIER
Appendix 1: Well records and maintenance summaries
Go to Part 1C for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 2: Water level monitoring plan
Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 3: Water level graphs for each water supply well
Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 4: Capital Improvement Plan
Go to Part 1E for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 5: Emergency Telephone List
Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 6: Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services
Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 7: Municipal Critical Water Deficiency Ordinance
Go to Part 2C for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 8: Graph of Ten Years of Annual Per Capita Water Demand for Each
Customer Category
Go to Objective 4 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 9: Water Rate Structure
Go to Objective 6 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 10: Ordinances or Regulations Related to Water Use
Go to Objective 7 in Part 3B for information on what to include in appendix
Appendix 11: Implementation Checklist
Provide a table that summarizes all the actions that the public water supplier is doing, or proposes to do,
with estimated implementation dates.
Appendix 12: Sources of Information for Table 10
Provide links or references to the information used to complete Table 10. If the file size is reasonable,
provide source information as attachments to the plan.
Appendix 2 – Water Level Monitoring Plan
There are currently no set parameters for monitoring water level readings at any city well location. In
2018 the City of Lake Elmo implemented monthly water level readings at all city wells.
The City of Lake Elmo will construct a new observation well in the Jordan Aquifer at the time that the
City constructs Well No. 6, anticipated for 2023 construction per the projected growth and water
demands. The City acknowledges that the DNR will not amend the DNR Water Appropriation Permit
1961‐1031 to authorize the use of Well No. 6 until the observation well has been constructed and a
transducer and data logger installed in the observation well. The observation well will be located
strategically to approximate the middle area of the Lake Elmo current and future well field.
The City of Lake Elmo will obtain hourly water level readings from the observation well using a data
logger and transducer. The water level information that is collected from the observation well will be
submitted to the DNR on an annual basis. The water level data shall be submitted using the DNR water
level reporting spreadsheet template, including hand readings.
Appendix 3
Current data is scattered and difficult to retrieve from SCADA. In 2018 the SCADA computer will be
modified to make the information more accessible and easier to read. Also monthly water level readings
will be documented.
City of Lake Elmo
Capital Improvement Program
2018 – 2022
DRAFT 10-12-17 Finance Committee
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction
What is a CIP? .................................................................................................................1
Scope of the Draft CIP .....................................................................................................1
Funding Sources...............................................................................................................2
Project Priorities ...............................................................................................................2
2018-2022 CIP Overview
Street Projects ..................................................................................................................3
Project Highlights by Department ...................................................................................4
CIP Reports (Appendix)
Projects Listings………………………………………………………………………....8
Projects by Year & Priority ..…………………………………………………………..11
Funding Source Summary……………………………………………………………...15
Projects by Funding Source…………………………………………………………….16
Projects & Funding Sources by Department…………………………………………...19
Project Detail……………………………….…………………………………………..23
INTRODUCTION
What is a CIP?
A Capital Improvement Program, or CIP, is a multi-year (typically 5 years) capital expenditure
plan for a City’s infrastructure (such as streets, parks and utility systems), vehicles, equipment
and public buildings. It identifies the major projects needed and desired by the community, their
potential costs and how they would be financed. Including a project in a CIP does not commit
the city to that project. The City Council must specifically authorize each one, and the
associated funding, before any project may proceed. When the CIP is reviewed (ideally annually,
in conjunction with the budgeting process) projects may go forward as planned, advance ahead
of schedule, be removed entirely, or new projects may be added, depending upon changes in
circumstances and priorities.
The Minnesota Land Planning Act requires that the implementation plan portion of the
Comprehensive Plan include a CIP for major infrastructure needs (transportation, wastewater,
water supply, parks and open space) for a five-year time period. Cities often expand the scope of
their CIPs to include other capital needs (major equipment replacements, for example) and
sometimes look beyond the five-year time period, up to 20 years in the future for some projects.
Such projects represent more of a “wish-list” that can be evaluated each time the plan is updated.
As a part of the Comprehensive Plan, the CIP has some legal standing. Minnesota Statutes
Chapter 473.865 provides that “a local governmental unit shall not adopt any official control or
fiscal device which is in conflict with its comprehensive plan.” A fiscal device includes a budget
or bond issue; so it is important that the plan and CIP be kept up to date and in synch with city
budgets.
The primary benefit of a CIP is as a financial planning tool, to help the city plan for the impact of
capital needs on future budgets and property taxes, and to help forecast the need for borrowing to
undertake major projects. The information developed as part of the capital planning process can
help document the need for various projects and help the City Council sort out competing
priorities.
Scope of the CIP
Lake Elmo’s CIP includes all capital projects that cost at least $25,000 and have a useful life
span of five years or longer. Projects include all capital needs including major repairs to
buildings and equipment purchases and replacements. Any projects not meeting these
parameters would be reviewed as part of the annual operating budget, but would not be included
in the CIP.
Funding Sources
The CIP identifies a possible funding source(s) for each project listed. The various funding
sources are as follows:
Debt Service Fund Projects financed by borrowing, later to be repaid with
property taxes, and potentially special assessments
depending upon the characteristics of the project.
General Fund Annual operating budget, primarily funded by property
tax revenues.
Park Improvement Fund
Existing City fund, receipts from cash-in-lieu of land park
dedication fees paid by developers and others who
subdivide their land.
Stormwater Fund Funds come from fees paid by users of the system
Wastewater Fund Funds come from fees paid by users on the Wastewater
System
Water Fund
Municipal State Aid (MSA)
Funds come from fees paid by users on the Water System
State aid funds allocated to the City each year; annual
allocation grows as the City grows.
In addition to these sources, it is possible that future projects could be funded from donations,
grants, user fees or other sources not listed. The City also has a City Facility Fund that was
created during the building of the public works barn. There is no plan to continue contributing to
the fund however there is $272,000 currently and that is projected to be $258,500 by the end of
the year. Approximately $77,000 has been reserved for paving the library parking lot in 2018.
The remaining funds could be transferred to the General Fund or used for some of the projects in
the CIP, i.e the new facilities planned. The Finance Committee recommends they be transferred
to the General Fund.
Project Priorities
Capital improvement projects should be prioritized in some way so that limited funding can be
allocated to those which are most important. This is difficult because the varying nature of the
projects and their benefits and objectives are so disparate as to be essentially not comparable. Some
public agencies have developed elaborate rating and ranking systems to try to set priorities.
Complicated scoring systems may have some disadvantages because they may give a false sense of
objectivity or precision to the priority setting process. Others use simpler systems, or simply do not
try to compare projects that are like “apples and oranges.” There is no accepted system or “industry
standard” for prioritizing projects.
The following system has been utilized by staff:
1 Critical or urgent, high-priority projects that should be done if at all
possible; a special effort should be made to find sufficient funding for all
of the projects in this group.
2 Very important, high-priority projects that should be done as funding
becomes available.
3 Important and worthwhile projects to be considered if funding is
available; may be deferred to a subsequent year.
4 Less important, low-priority projects; desirable but not essential.
5 Future Consideration
2018-2022 CIP OVERVIEW
For 2018 through 2022, the draft CIP includes 82 separate projects (active, pending and new
recommendations) with a total estimated cost of $49,043,666. All cost estimates are preliminary
and based on current dollars. No assumptions have been made about inflation. It will be
important to refine and update costs when the plan is reviewed, especially for projects in the first
year or two of the plan.
Some projects beyond the five-year planning period are also included in the CIP. Most of these
projects are replacements for equipment and vehicles (such as fire trucks) which may have a life
span of 10, 15 to 20 years or even more. The plan may include “pending” projects for which
timelines (and in most cases, cost estimates) have not yet been identified. As more information
is developed about the need for, cost, and possible funding sources for these projects, they will
be included in future CIP updates.
Street Projects
The update includes the following street projects in the CIP:
• PW-010, Lake Elmo Ave turn lanes at 5th St for $50,000 in 2018.
• PW-011, South Tri Lakes roads and Phase Four of the downtown area are planned for
reconstruction in 2018 for a revised estimated cost of $1,760,000
• PW-013, 36th, 37th, 38th, 39th, Irwin and Innsdale streets are planned for reconstruction in
2019 at a revised estimated cost of $1,390,000.
• PW-026, Reclaim roads in Heritage Farms, Stonegate 2nd at a cost of $1,050,000 in 2020
• PW-027, Reconstruction of roads in Fields of St Croix, Tamarack Farms, and Hamlet on
Sunfish Lake and Old Village Phase 5 for $3,109,000 in 2021.
• PW-029, CSAH 19/Hudson Blvd Signal and Turn Lanes for an estimated $500,000 has
been moved up to 2018 from 2019.
• PW-030, CSAH 15/30th St Signal (Manning) for $100,000 in 2020
• PW-031, CSAH 6/Inwood Signal for $100,000 in 2022
• PW-034, 15th St N (MSA Street) for $950,000 in 2020
• PW-035, UP RR Crossing-Village Parkway for $500,000 moved to 2019 from 2018
• PW-036, UP RR Crossing-Private Drive Closure for $100,000 moved to 2019 from 2018
• PW-037, UP RR Crossing-Klondike Ave for $250,000 moved to 2019 from 2018
• PW-038, 2022 Street Improvements and Old Village Phase 6 streets, $1,300,000 (new)
• PW-051, CSAH 14/CSAH 15 realignment payment in 2019 (new)
Project Highlights by Department
Administration/Finance:
AF-001, New City Hall, Fire Station and Public Works Improvements, is the only request
in this department. The scope of the space needs study was expanded to include a new
fire station and improvements to the main public works facility as well. The Finance
Committee recommendation was to break these projects out over multiple years. A new
fire station would built in 2019/2020 with borrowing split amongst the two year ($3.5
million each year). The improvements to the public works facility was split amongst
three years with a new salt shed planned for 2018 at $250,000; an office addition for
$500,000 in 2019, and improvements to the yard (paving) for $250,000 in 2020. A new
city hall it programmed for 2021/2022 with borrowing of $3.5 million each year.
Fire:
F-001, Rescue Engine E2 replacement at a revised estimated cost of $625,000 in 2018
F-004, Replace Tender 1 for revised estimated cost of $400,000 in 2019
F-005, Replacement of the parking lot at Station 2 for $87,560 in 2018. This item was
recommended to move to pending by the Finance Committee.
F-006, Replacement of U2 Truck for $75,000 in 2019 could be removed if combined with
E2 engine
F-007, Self-Contained Breathing Apparatus (SCBA) replacements for $207,000 in 2019
F-010, Replace B1 for $70,000 in 2021.
F-011, Engine E1 replacement for $500,000 in 2022
F-017, Turnout Gear Replacements for $60,000 in 2022 (new)
Parks and Recreation:
PR-003, Demontreville Park Improvements for $75,000 in 2018. The Park Commission
is again requesting this funding for a new field, regrading the existing field, and a new
backstop.
PR-004, Lions Park Improvements, Phase 2 in 2018. This includes a new pavilion and
picnic tables but would only occur of the items are donated.(new)
PR-005, Pebble Park Improvements for $72,000 in 2019 (paving parking area and two
volleyball courts, lighting and security features).
PR-006, Reid Park Improvements for $50,000 in 2018 (this would be a grant or in-kind
donation for mountain bike trails) and $25,000 for widening the walking trails. In 2019
(tot lot, outdoor gym stations, bleachers), extending fencing, and elimination of
basketball court (Phase II) for $34,250
PR-007, Sunfish Lake Park Improvements for $90,000 in 2021 includes paving trails to
meet ADA standards.
PR-008, Tablyn Park Improvements includes additional lighting at the top of the hill and
better use of the parking lot space to address safety concerns for $55,000 in 2018. The
2019 improvements would be $45,000 related to setting up a skating rink at the park.
PR-009, Lake Elmo Regional Trail for $827,316 in 2021 and $765,600 in 2022. This
project would be 75% grant funded and is dependent upon County participation. The
City share is estimated at $398k.
PR-012, Service Truck for $200,000 in 2019 with costs split equally amongst water,
sewer, streets and parks (new)
PR-013, Trac Hoe for $60,000 in 2020 with costs split equally amongst water,
stormwater, streets and parks (new)
PR-014, Tri Deck Mower for $70,000 in 2020 (new)
PR-015, One Ton Truck for $130,000 in 2022 (new)
PR-016, Cushman replacement for $25,000 in 2018 (new)
PR-017, New Ballfields for $1 million in 2022. (new)
PR-018, New Park Development for $150,000 in 2020 (new)
Public Works:
Street Projects were mentioned above
PW-004. Loader, for $185,000 in 2019 was moved to 2023
PW-006, Tractor, for $80,000 in 2018 was moved to 2020
PW-019, Pickup Replacement, for $30,000 in 2020 was moved to 2022
PW-020, Pickup Replacement, for $30,000 in 2021 was moved to 2024
PW-021. 1 Ton Replacement, for $70,000 in 2019 was moved up to 2018
PW-022, Dump Truck with Plow Wing and Sander, for revised estimated cost of
$240,000 in 2019 was moved up to 2018
PW-023, Vac Trailer, for $45,000 in 2018
PW-043, Service Truck for $200,000 in 2019 with costs split equally amongst water,
sewer, streets and parks (new)
PW-044, Trac Hoe for $60,000 in 2020 with costs split equally amongst water,
stormwater, streets and parks (new)
PW-045, Tandem Plow Truck for $265,000 in 2019 (new)
PW-046, Asphalt Roller for $30,000 in 2018 (new)
PW-047, Dump Truck with Plow for $240,000 in 2020 (new)
PW-048, Mini Loader for $120,000 in 2020 (new)
PW-049, Asphalt Hot Box for $60,000 in 2021 (new)
PW-050, Dump Truck with Plow for $245,000 in 2022 (new)
Sewer System:
S-003, Sunfish Lake Sewer (Includes Hamlet), for $240,000 in 2018. This is per an
agreement with MPCA
S-004, Old Village Sewer Extension Phase Four, for revised estimated cost of $585,000
in 2018
S-005, Old Village Sewer Extension Phase Five, for revised estimated cost of $1,100,000
in 2021
S-007, Utility Vehicle, cost split between water and sewer funds in 2018. Sewer portion
is $32,500
S-012, Section 36 Trunk Sewer for $1,500,000 in 2021
S-013, Sewer Oversizing for $52,500 in 2018
S-014, Service Truck for $200,000 in 2019 with costs split equally amongst water, sewer,
streets and parks (new)
S-015, Utility Truck for $70,000 in 2021 with costs split equally amongst water and
sewer (new).
S-016, Old Village Sewer Extension Phase Six for $510,000 in 2022
S-017, Old Village Sewer Extension Phase Seven for $475,000 in 2023
Storm Water System:
SW-001, Phase 2 Regional Drainage Improvements for $1,200,000 in 2019 and $800,000
in 2020
SW-002, Phase 3 Regional Drainage Improvements for $500,000 in 2020
SW-003, Kramer Lake Floodplain Study for $60,000 in 2022 assumes a grant from the
watershed district
SW-004, Surface Water Management Plan (Comp Plan) update for $40,000 in 2018
SW-006, Trac Hoe for $60,000 in 2020 with costs split equally amongst water,
stormwater, streets and parks (new)
Water System:
W-001, 36th, 37th , 38th, 39th, Innsdale and Irwin water main for $900,000 in 2019
W-003, Old Village water extension Phase Four, for $350,000 in 2018
W-004, Pressure reduction Station-Hammes Bypass for $120,000 in 2020
W-005, Old Village water main Phase Five, for revised estimated cost of $885,000 in
2021
W-006, Elevated Storage Tank #3, for $200,000 in 2019 and 2,800,000 in 2020
W-008, Village East Trunk Water main, for $120,000 in 2019
W-009, Utility Vehicle, shared with sewer fund. Water fund portion is $32,500
W-013, Water main Oversizing for $105,000 in 2018, $42,000 in 2019 and $119,000 in
2022.
W-014, Well & Pumphouse #5 for $2,100,000 in 2021
W-017, Water Main replacement consistent with 2020 Street Replacement for $50,000 in
2020
W-018, Water Main replacement consistent with 2021 Street Replacement for $50,000 in
2021.
W-019, SCADA System Upgrade for $30,000 in 2022
W-020, Service Truck for $200,000 in 2019 with costs split equally amongst water,
sewer, streets and parks (new)
W-021, Trac Hoe for $60,000 in 2020 with costs split equally amongst water,
stormwater, streets and parks (new)
W-022, Utility Truck for $70,000 in 2021 with costs split equally amongst water and
sewer (new).
W-023, Water Meter Change out for $47,000 each year in 2018-2022 (new)
W-024, Automated Radio Read System for $300,000 in 2022 (new)
W-025, Old Village water extension Phase Six for $200,000 in 2022
W-026, Old Village water extension Phase Seven for $230,000 in 2023
W-027, Pressure Reduction Station-Connection to WT #3 for $120,000 in 2022
City of Lake Elmo
Capital Improvement Program
2018-2022
Appendix
Attachment 5
City of Lake Elmo
Emergency Telephone List
Emergency Response Team Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Emergency Response Lead
Rob Weldon 651-747-3941 715-222-5557
Alternate Emergency
Response Lead
Jamie Colemer 651-747-3945 651-248-1688
Water Operator Jim Sachs 651-747-3942 651-248-8468
Alternate Water Operator Mike Coleman 651-491-8561
Public Communications Kristina Handt 651-747-3905
State and Local Emergency
Response Contacts
Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
State Incident Duty Officer Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
County Emergency Director 651-430-7938 651-439-9381
National Guard Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
Mayor/Board Chair Mike Pearson 651-748-9955 651-775-3724
Fire Chief Greg Malmquist 651-770-5006 651-775-1137
Sheriff 911 651-439-9381
Police Chief 911
Ambulance
Hospital
Doctor or Medical Facility
State and Local Agencies Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
MDH District Engineer Lucas Martin 651-201-4144
MDH Drinking Water Protection 651-201-4700
State Testing Laboratory Minnesota Duty Officer 800/422-0798 Out State 651-649-5451 Metro
MPCA 651-296-6300
DNR Area Hydrologist John Freitag 651-201-4669
County Water Planner
Utilities Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Electric Company Xcel Energy 1-800-895-1999
Gas Company Xcel Energy 1-800-895-1999
Telephone Company
Gopher State One Call Utility Locations 800-252-1166 651-454-0002
Highway Department Washington County PW 651-430-4300 651-439-9381
Mutual Aid Agreements Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Neighboring Water System City of Oakdale 651-730-2740 651-755-4422
Emergency Water Connection City of Oakdale 651-730-2740 651-755-4422
Materials
Technical/Contracted
Services/Supplies
Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
MRWA Technical Services MN Rural Water Association 800-367-6792
Well Driller/Repair McCarthy Well 952-854-5333
Pump Repair McCarthy Well 952-854-5333
Electrician Mercury Electric 651-464-1660
Plumber Miller Excavating 651-439-1637 651-269-8176
Backhoe Miller Excavating 651-439-1637 651-269-8176
Chemical Feed Hawkins Chemical 651-730-1115 612-804-5427
Meter Repair Core & Main 715-386-6010
Generator Kodiak Power Systems
Valves Core & Main 715-386-6010
Pipe & Fittings Core & Main 715-386-6010
Water Storage
Laboratory Tri-City Lab 952-563-8777
Engineering firm FOCUS Engineering 651-300-4264
Communications Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
News Paper Stillwater Gazette 651-439-3130
Radio Station
School Superintendent School District of Stillwater 651-351-8340
Property & Casualty Insurance League of Minnesota Cities 651-281-1200
Critical Water Users Name Work Telephone Alternate Telephone
Hospital
Critical Use:
Nursing Home
Critical Use:
Public Shelter
Critical Use:
Appendix 6
A Cooperative Agreement for Emergency Services does not currently exist for the City of lake Elmo
Public Works/Water Supply System.
Appendix 7
§ 50.40 WATER USE RESTRICTIONS.
(A) Emergency authority. To protect the health and safety of the consumers, as well as the
general welfare, the Mayor or City Council may impose emergency regulations pertaining to city
water use. Whenever the city shall determine that a critical water deficiency prevails, it may limit
the times and hours during which water may be used from the city water system for lawn and
garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing, air conditioning, and other nonessential uses. It is
unlawful for any water consumer to cause or permit water to be used in violation of such
determination after public announcement thereof has been made through publication or by
posting in the City Hall and city website specifically indicating the restrictions thereof.
(1) The Mayor or City Council may declare a critical water deficiency to prevail within the
city whenever it finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements of water
consumers cannot be satisfied without depleting the water supply of the city to the extent that
there would be insufficient water for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection.
(2) The Mayor or City Council shall thereupon enact such regulations and restrictions on the
delivery of water and the consumption within the city to conserve the water supply for the
greatest public benefit with particular regard to domestic use, sanitation, and fire protection.
(3) When the Governor of the State of Minnesota declares a critical water deficiency, the
Mayor or City Council will enact and enforce water conservation restrictions in accordance with
M.S. § 103G.291.
(4) Water use regulations and restrictions may include the right to deny applications for new
or additional service connections, and provisions for their enforcement by discontinuing service
to customers willfully violating the regulations and restrictions.
(B) Permanent water use restrictions. To encourage water conservation and allow flexibility
in the city’s water system in meeting peak demands, and to reduce the required water supply and
storage capacity requirements allowing for a lower cost water system, certain limitations must be
placed on the city’s water supply.
(1) Odd/even sprinkling ban. Property owners having even numbered postal addresses may
water, sprinkle, or irrigate their lawns only on even numbered days, and property owners having
odd numbered postal addresses may water, sprinkle, or irrigate their lawns only on odd
numbered days.
(2) Time of day sprinkling ban. All property owners are prohibited from watering,
sprinkling, or irrigating their lawns between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. daily.
(3) Exceptions. The permanent water use restrictions do not apply in the following
situations.
(a) Private wells.
(b) Recently established lawns if permission is granted through a watering restriction
waiver form, allowing daily watering for up to 30 days after installation. Watering must still
adhere to the restricted hours for the time of day sprinkling ban. New sod or seeded lawns or
other landscaping requiring watering, sprinkling, or irrigation, shall not be installed during a
water shortage emergency.
(c) Attended hand watering of plants, shrubs, trees, and gardens.
(C) Lawn watering, sprinkling, and irrigation. All lawn sprinkler systems and irrigation
systems connected to the municipal water system, whether such systems are aboveground or
underground, shall require a permit for connection and shall be installed in accordance with the
Minnesota State Plumbing Code. To conserve water, all lawn sprinkler systems and irrigation
systems which are automatic or are equipped to operate automatically and which are connected
to the municipal water system, shall be equipped with a rain-detection device such to prevent the
system from operating when it rains (per M.S. § 103G.298). All lawn sprinkler systems and
irrigation systems connected to the municipal water system shall be constructed and operated to
prevent water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation by prohibiting runoff, low
head drainage, over spray, or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent property,
non-irrigated areas, walks, roadways, or structures.
(D) Enforcement. Failure to comply with restrictions or prohibitions imposed under this
section shall result in a surcharge for water service for each violation in an amount determined
by resolution of the City Council, which shall be added to the water bill for the property on
which such violation occurs. Each day of violation shall be deemed a separate violation.
Continued violation shall be cause for discontinuing water service.
(Ord. 08-018, passed 11-4-2009)
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024Total Per Capita (GPCD)Year
City of Lake Elmo Total Per Capita Demand
Residential C/I/I Wholesale
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Amateur Radio Antenna $875.00 Planning
Appeal (to Board of Adjustment and Appeals)$250.00 Administration
Bee Keeping Permit $25.00 Valid for 2 years from issuance Administration
Building Regulations * State Sur Charge Collected per MN Statute 326B.148 on all
permits Building
Building Permit Fee Schedule
Total Valuation
$1.00 to $500.00 $29.50 Building
$501.00 to $2,000.00 $28.00 for the first $500.00 plus $3.70 for each additional $100.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $2,000.00.
$2,001.00 to $25,000.00 $83.50 for the first $2,000.00 + $16.55 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $25,000.00.
$25,001.00 to $50,000.00 $464.15 for the first $25,000.00 + $12.00 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $50,000.00.
$50,001.00 to $100,000.00 $764.15 for the first $50,000.00 + $8.45 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $100,000.00.
$100,001.00 to $500,000.00 $1,186.65 for the first $100,000.00 + $6.75 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00.
$500,001.00 to $1,000,000.00 $3,886.65 for the first $500,000.00 + $5.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof, to and including $1,000,000.00.
$1,000,001.00 and up $6,636.65 for the first $1,000,000.00 + $4.50 for each additional $1,000.00, or fraction thereof.Building
Planning and Zoning Compliance Review and Verification $100.00 Building
Plan Review Fee 65% of building permit fee Building
Plan review for similar plans 25% of normal building permit fee (MN Rules 1300.0160 subp. 5)Building
Single Family Decks Fee based on Valuation Building
Single Family Residential Basement Finish Fee Based on Valuation Building
Swimming Pool In-Ground $150.00 Building
Swimming Pool Above-Ground $75.00 Building
Reinspection Fee $75.00 Building
Inspection outside normal business hours $120.00 per hour - 2 hour minimum Building
Investigation fee - work started without required permit Equal to permit fee amount Building
Replace Inspection Record Card $25.00 Building
Additional Plan Review required by changes, addendum or
revisions to plans $75.00 per hour, one hour minimum Building
Building Demolition - Residential $200.00 Building
Building Demolition - Commercial $300.00 Building
Fuel Tank Removal (Underground)$250.00 Building
Fuel Tank Installation 2% Value of the work Building
Roofing - Residential Fee Based on Valuation Building
Roofing - Commercial Fee Based on Valuation Building
Siding - Residential Fee Based on Valuation Building
1
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Siding - Commercial Fee Based on Valuation Building
Retaining Walls over 4'Fee Based on Valuation Building
Commercial Plumbing $60.00 per unit, Up to 3 Units or 1.5% Value of work, whichever is greater Building
Residential Plumbing $60.00 per Unit, max fee $180.00 Building
Sewer Service Installation Inspection $60.00 Building
Water Service Installation Inspection $60.00 Building
Sewer & Water Service Installation Inspection when completed
together $60.00 Building
Investigation fee - Plumbing work started without required permit Equal to permit fee amount Building
Commercial HVAC $60.00 per unit, Up to 3 Units or 1.5% Value of work, whichever is greater Building
Residential HVAC $60.00 per Unit, max fee $180.00 Building
Fireplace Installation $60 per unit Building
Investigation fee - HVAC work started without required permit Equal to permit fee amount Building
Manufactured Home Move In $200.00 Building
Manufactured Home Move Out $200.00 Building
Moving House or Primary Structure into the City 2% Value of the Work plus security amount determined by the Building Official Building
Moving Accessory Structure into the City 2% Value of the Work plus security amount determined by the Building Official Building
Automatic Fire Extinguishing Systems 2% Value, $100.00 minimum Building
Investigation fee - Fire Suppression work started without required
permit Equal to permit fee amount Building
Fire Alarm Systems 2% Value, $100.00 minimum Building
Investigation fee - Fire Alarm work started without required
permit Equal to permit fee amount Building
Annual Retail Consumer Fireworks (retailers only selling fireworks)$350.00 Building
Annual Retail Consumer Fireworks (all other retailers)$100.00 Building
Outdoor Public Fireworks Display $150.00 Building
Residential Day Care Inspections $50.00 Building
Residential Adult Care/Foster Care/Adoption Inspections $50.00 Building
Escrow Administration Fee $100.00 Building
New Single Family Dwelling Construction Escrow $2,000.00 Building
Two or more dwelling units per building Construction Escrow $1,000.00 per unit Building
Commercial/Industrial and Other structures $5,000.00 or amount detrmined by the Building Official Building
2
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Burning Permit Fire
Residential $45.00 Fire
Commercial $80.00 Fire
Illegal Burn see notes →Additional fees may be incurred based on Wash. Cty. Chief's fee
schedule and # of responding units Fire
Chicken Keeping Permit $25.00 Initial permit expires on 12/31 of 2nd year.Administration
Comprehensive Plan Amendment $1,300.00 Land Use Escrow $2500 Planning
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) Planning
New $1,050.00 Planning
Amended $500.00 Planning
Contractor License Fees Licensing
Driveway $50.00 Licensing
Solid Waste Hauler $120.00 Licensing
Copy Services (Paper/Electronic)Administration
Copies (B&W)$0.25 per page 100 pages or more are charged at actual cost of production Administration
Copies (Color)$0.50 per page 100 pages or more are charged at actual cost of production Administration
Copies (B&W) 11x17 $1.00 per page 100 pages or more are charged at actual cost of production Administration
Copies (Color) 11x17 $2.00 per page 100 pages or more are charged at actual cost of production Administration
Data DVD Fee $15.00 Administration
GIS Scaled Aerial $25.00 Administration
Existing Maps $5.00 Administration
Custom (Per Hour Rate)$70.00 Administration
Plan Size Maps (Larger than 11x17)$15.00 Administration
Development Standards Specs/Details $55.00 Administration
Video reproduction $10.00 Administration
Culverts in Developments with Rural Section $160.00 Administration
Dog License- altered $20.00 Licensing
Dog License- unaltered $25.00 Licensing
Dog License- late fee $2.50 per month Maximum $10 Licensing
Service Dog License No Charge Licensing
Duplicate License or Tag $1.00 Licensing
First Impound- Unlicensed Dog $60.00 Licensing
First Impound- Licensed Dog $42.00 Licensing
First Impound- Cat $42.00 Licensing
Wireless Communication Facilities Fee Escrow $6,000.00. Flood
Plain Ordinance Fee Escrow $500.00 Land Use Escrow $2500
All Impound Fees plus $20/day Boarding Fee
3
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Subsequent dog/ cat impound $85.00 Licensing
Driveway Planning
Residential $70.00 Planning
Commercial $160.00 Planning
Easement Encroachment $100.00 Staff & Recording Fee Planning
Electronic Fund Withdrawl/Bill Payment Fee + Trans. Charge Administration
Environmental Review (EAW/EIS)$1,500.00 $2,500 Land Use escrow
Village Area AUAR Fee $230.00
Per REC Unit. To be charged to development applications that
increase the number of REC units above existing conditions
within the Village AUAR Area. The fee will be based on the
difference between the proposed and existing REC units. Fee to
be paid as part of a developer’s agreement for larger projects or
at the time a building permit is issued for smaller projects. Once
paid, the same land will not be charged again.Planning
Erosion Control Building
Re-inspection Fee (portal to portal from City Hall: 1 Hr. min)$50.00 per hour $5,000.00 Security Building
Excavating & Grading ≥ 50 cubic yards, up to 400 cubic yds $125.00 Security $500.00 Building
Excavating & Grading ≥ 400 cubic yards/acre of site area $500.00 $500.00 fee escrow. Plus Security as Determined by the Planning
Department Engineering
False Alarms (12 Month Period)* (*1-3 no charge)Fire
Residential Fire
4-6 False Alarms $110.00 Fire
In Excess of 6 False Alarms $185.00 Fire
Commercial Fire
4-6 False Alarms $315.00 Fire
In Excess of 6 False Alarms $520.00 Fire
Flood Plain District Delineation $500.00 Planning
Interim Use Permit (IUP)
Fee $1,050.00 $2,500.00 Escrow Planning
Renewal $300.00 Planning
Liquor License Licensing
Club On-Sale Intoxicating $100.00 Licensing
4
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
On-Sale Intoxicating $1,500.00 Licensing
Off-Sale Intoxicating $200.00 Licensing
Off-Sale Non-Intoxicating $150.00 Licensing
On-Sale Intoxicating- 2nd Building $750.00 Licensing
On-Sale Non-Intoxicating $100.00 Licensing
Investigation $350.00 Licensing
On-Sale Sunday Intoxicating $200.00 Licensing
Temporary Intoxicating $25.00 Licensing
Wine $300.00 Licensing
Lot Line Adjustment $325.00 None Planning
Massage Therapy Premises License Licensing
Application Fee $100.00 Fee includes one Therapist Licensing
Investigation Fee $100.00 Licensing
Massage Therapy Practitioner License Licensing
Application Fee $50.00 Licensing
Investigation Fee $25.00 Licensing
Massage Therapy Premises License Renewal $50.00 Fee includes one Therapist Licensing
Massage Therapy Practitioner License Renewal $25.00 Licensing
Massage Therapy License Amendment $25.00 Licensing
Minor Subdivision $525.00 $1,000.00 escrow Planning
Park Dedication Planning
Residential - Up to three lots $3,600.00 per lot Four or more lots per §153.14 Planning
Commercial $4,500.00 per acre Planning
Parking Lots Planning
Commercial $200.00 $500 Fee Escrow. Plus Security as Determined by the Planning
Department Planning
Platting
Sketch Plan Review (Subdivision)$500.00 $3,500.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Preliminary Plat (Subdivision)$1,850.00 $10,000.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Final Plat (Subdivision)$1,250.00 $8,000.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Planned Unit Development
General Concept Plan $1,250.00 $7,500 Fee Escrow (Waive Subdivision Escrow)Planning
Development Stage Plan $1,850.00 $10,000 Fee Escrow (Waive Subdivision Escrow)Planning
5
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Final Plan $1,250.00 $8,000 Fee Escrow (Waive Subdivision Escrow)Planning
(City will retain escrows to reimburse review costs for each stage
plan of development)
Private Roads (Permitted only in AG zone)$150.00 Planning
Restrictive Soils and Wetland Restoration Protection and
Preservation Permit $800.00 Planning
Returned Check (NSF)$25.00 Administration
Right-of-way Permit
annual Registration $200.00 $5,000 Security Engineering
Excavation Permit $275.00 + $.60/foot Engineering
Joint Trench Permit (per lot per utility)$275.00 + $.60/foot Engineering
Obstruction Permit $275.00 Engineering
Small Wireless Permit Fee $275.00 Engineering
Permit Extension $100.00 Engineering
Delay Penalty (per calendar day)$25.00 Engineering
SAC Charge (City) (Sewer Availability Charge)$3,000.00
Per REC Unit: collected at time of plat for new lot. This fee may
be deferred through special assessment for parcels with existing
structures.Engineering
SAC Charge (Met Council) (Sewer Availability Charge)$2,485.00 Per REC Unit: $2,485.00 to Met Council at time of connection.Engineering
Sewer Connection Charge $1,000.00
Per REC Unit collected at time of plat for new lot. This fee may
be deferred through special assessment for parcels with existing
structures.Engineering
Sewer Lateral Benefit Charge $11,000.00 Per REC Unit connecting to a Trunk Sewer Main and that has
never been assessed Engineering
Sewer Rate $4.50/1,000 Gal Administration
201 Off-Site Maintenance Fee $75.00/unit/quarter Administration
Real Estate Searches $15.00/Search For special assessment or utility search Administration
Signs - Permanent $180.00 Planning
Signs - Temporary $75.00 Planning
Temporary Renewal $25.00 Planning
Re-inspection Fee $25.00 Planning
Special Event Permit $75.00 City must be listed as additional insured Planning
Surface Water Administration
Residential $50.00 Administration
Non-Residential (Commercial etc.)$50.00 Utility rate factor per code Administration
Review Fee $125.00 $75 Review/$50 Storm Water Fund Administration
6
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Vacations (Streets or Easements)Planning
Easements $515.00 $500.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Streets $515.00 $500.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Variance $750.00 $500.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Shoreland Variance $1,500.00 $500.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Water Availability Charge (WAC)$3,000.00
Per REC Unit; collected at time of plat for new lot. This fee may
be deferred through special assessment for parcels with existing
structures. Engineering
Water Connection Charge $1,000.00
Per REC Unit, collected at time of plat for new lot. This fee may
be deferred through special assessment for parcels with existing
structures. Administration
Water Equipment/Set up Administration
Meter (3/4" or less)$350.00 Administration
Driveway Curb Stop Lid $100.00 Administration
Disconnect Service $80.00 Administration
Reconnect Service $80.00 Administration
Water Lateral Benefit Charge $5,800.00
Per REC Unit connecting to a Trunk Water Main and that has
never been assessed Engineering
Water Usage Administration
Residential - Quarterly Rate $20.00 Base Administration
Residential - Plus Rate per 1,000 Gallons Administration
Plus Rate for 0-15,000 Gallons $2.00 Administration
Plus Rate for 15,001-30,000 Gallons $2.40 Administration
Plus Rate for 30,001-50,000 Gallons $2.88 Administration
Plus Rate for 50,001-80,000 Gallons $3.46 Administration
Plus Rate for 80,001 + Gallons $4.15 Administration
Water Usage Administration
Commercial - Quarterly Rate $25.00 Base Administration
Commercial - Plus Rate Per 1,000 Gallons Administration
Plus Rate for 0 - 15,000 Gallons $3.11 Administration
Plus Rate for 15,001 - 30,000 Gallons $3.26 Administration
Plus Rate for 30,001 - 50,000 Gallon $3.77 Administration
Additional fees apply to larger sized meters
7
City of Lake Elmo Fee Schedule 2017
APPLICATION/FEE/PERMIT TYPE 2017 FEE ESCROW OR ADDITIONAL CHARGE DEPARTMENT
Plus Rate for 50,001 - 80,000 Gallons $5.00 Administration
Plus Rate for 80,001 + Gallons $6.63 Administration
Water Usage For metered non-irrigation (domestic) consumption Administration
Hotel / Motel - Quarterly Rate $25.00 Base Administration
Hotel / Motel - Plus Rate Per 1,000 Gallons Administration
Plus Rate for 0 -30,000 Gallons $3.11 Administration
Plus Rate for 30,001 - 50,000 Gallons $3.26 Administration
Plus Rate for 50,001 + Gallons $4.00 Administration
Water Usage Delinquent Accounts Administration
Regular 6% per quarter Plus $25.00 or 8%, whichever is greater, if certified to County for
collection with taxes Administration
Storm Water 10% per year Plus $25.00 or 8%, whichever is greater, if certified to County for
collection with taxes Administration
Bulk Water Purchase Administration
Water from Hydrant $100.00 minumum Plus $3.26/additional 1,000 gallons Administration
Sod Installation (New Construction)
$100.00 minumum
Plus $3.26 per 1,000 gallons. Good for up to 45 days from sod
install. Residents must contact the City in advance.Administration
Swimming Pool Fill $100.00 minumum Plus $3.26 per 1,000 gallons. Good for up to 45 days from sod install. Residents must contact the City in advance.Administration
Wind Generator $850.00 $2,000.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Wireless Communication Permit $500.00 $6,000.00 Fee Escrow Planning
Zoning Amendment (Text or Map)$1,245.00 $2,500.00 Escrow Planning
Zoning Certification Letter $25.00 Planning
Zoning Permit - Certificate of Zoning Compliance Planning
Accessory Structures < 200 SF $75.00 Planning
Fence (less than 6')$75.00 Planning
Other $75.00
Definition of Terms
Approved by CC 7.18.17; effective 7.19.17
**Security: City will retain a security escrow to ensure completion of work as directed by the approved permit/application and compliance with the State Building Code and the City of Lake Elmo
Municipal Code.
*Fee Escrow: City will maintain a fee escrow to cover all City review costs. Application fees include all professional fees and expenses incurred by the City.
8
Appendix 10
§ 50.40 WATER USE RESTRICTIONS.
(A) Emergency authority. To protect the health and safety of the consumers, as well as the
general welfare, the Mayor or City Council may impose emergency regulations pertaining to city
water use. Whenever the city shall determine that a critical water deficiency prevails, it may limit
the times and hours during which water may be used from the city water system for lawn and
garden sprinkling, irrigation, car washing, air conditioning, and other nonessential uses. It is
unlawful for any water consumer to cause or permit water to be used in violation of such
determination after public announcement thereof has been made through publication or by
posting in the City Hall and city website specifically indicating the restrictions thereof.
(1) The Mayor or City Council may declare a critical water deficiency to prevail within the
city whenever it finds and determines that the ordinary demands and requirements of water
consumers cannot be satisfied without depleting the water supply of the city to the extent that
there would be insufficient water for human consumption, sanitation, and fire protection.
(2) The Mayor or City Council shall thereupon enact such regulations and restrictions on the
delivery of water and the consumption within the city to conserve the water supply for the
greatest public benefit with particular regard to domestic use, sanitation, and fire protection.
(3) When the Governor of the State of Minnesota declares a critical water deficiency, the
Mayor or City Council will enact and enforce water conservation restrictions in accordance with
M.S. § 103G.291.
(4) Water use regulations and restrictions may include the right to deny applications for new
or additional service connections, and provisions for their enforcement by discontinuing service
to customers willfully violating the regulations and restrictions.
(B) Permanent water use restrictions. To encourage water conservation and allow flexibility
in the city’s water system in meeting peak demands, and to reduce the required water supply and
storage capacity requirements allowing for a lower cost water system, certain limitations must be
placed on the city’s water supply.
(1) Odd/even sprinkling ban. Property owners having even numbered postal addresses may
water, sprinkle, or irrigate their lawns only on even numbered days, and property owners having
odd numbered postal addresses may water, sprinkle, or irrigate their lawns only on odd
numbered days.
(2) Time of day sprinkling ban. All property owners are prohibited from watering,
sprinkling, or irrigating their lawns between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. daily.
(3) Exceptions. The permanent water use restrictions do not apply in the following
situations.
(a) Private wells.
(b) Recently established lawns if permission is granted through a watering restriction
waiver form, allowing daily watering for up to 30 days after installation. Watering must still
adhere to the restricted hours for the time of day sprinkling ban. New sod or seeded lawns or
other landscaping requiring watering, sprinkling, or irrigation, shall not be installed during a
water shortage emergency.
(c) Attended hand watering of plants, shrubs, trees, and gardens.
(C) Lawn watering, sprinkling, and irrigation. All lawn sprinkler systems and irrigation
systems connected to the municipal water system, whether such systems are aboveground or
underground, shall require a permit for connection and shall be installed in accordance with the
Minnesota State Plumbing Code. To conserve water, all lawn sprinkler systems and irrigation
systems which are automatic or are equipped to operate automatically and which are connected
to the municipal water system, shall be equipped with a rain-detection device such to prevent the
system from operating when it rains (per M.S. § 103G.298). All lawn sprinkler systems and
irrigation systems connected to the municipal water system shall be constructed and operated to
prevent water waste resulting from inefficient landscape irrigation by prohibiting runoff, low
head drainage, over spray, or other similar conditions where water flows onto adjacent property,
non-irrigated areas, walks, roadways, or structures.
(D) Enforcement. Failure to comply with restrictions or prohibitions imposed under this
section shall result in a surcharge for water service for each violation in an amount determined
by resolution of the City Council, which shall be added to the water bill for the property on
which such violation occurs. Each day of violation shall be deemed a separate violation.
Continued violation shall be cause for discontinuing water service.
(Ord. 08-018, passed 11-4-2009)
A. Landscaping Standards
1. A landscape plan for the entire site is required and shall consist of at least 10 trees per
building site; and trees shall not be not less than 1.5 inch in caliper measured at 54
inches above grade level.
2. Boulevard landscaping is required along all streets to consist of at least 1 tree per every
30 feet or placed in clusters at the same ratio.
B. Impervious Surface Standards
The maximum impervious surface allowable within an open space planned unit
development shall be 20% of the land area not dedicated as preserved open space subject to
the following:
1. Impervious surfaces created by roads, trails, and other planned impervious
improvements shall count against the maximum allowed impervious coverage.
2. Remaining allowed impervious surface acreage may be distributed between the planned
building sites, and maximums for each lot shall be clearly documented within the
overlay district ordinance governing the development.
3. On individual lots, areas covered by pervious pavers or comparable systems may
receive a 25% credit against the lot’s hardcover if the system is installed consistent with
the City of Lake Elmo Engineering Standards Manual, and adequate storm water
mitigation measures (as may be necessary) are installed to mitigate potential runoff
created by the additional coverage above the allowed impervious surface threshold. All
such credits shall be at the discretion of the City Engineer.
Tree Requirements-
A. Landscaping of Setback Areas. All required setbacks not occupied by buildings, parking,
paths or plazas shall be landscaped with turf grass, native grass, trees, shrubs, vines,
perennial flowering plants, and surrounding pervious ground cover.
1. A minimum of one (1) tree shall be planted for every fifty (50) feet of street
frontage, lake shore or stream frontage, or fraction thereof.
a. Trees adjacent to streets shall be planted within the front yard and may be
arranged in a cluster or placed at regular intervals to best complement existing
landscape design patterns in the area.
b. Salt tolerance and root structure should be considered when selecting tree
species adjacent to streets, sidewalks and parking areas.
c. Where property abuts a lake or stream, trees shall be planted at intervals of no
more than fifty (50) feet along the shoreline, except where natural vegetation
is sufficient to meet this requirement.
2. In addition to the requirements of C.1 above, a minimum of five (5) trees shall be
planted for every one (1) acre of land that is developed or disturbed by
development activity. Such trees may be used for parking lot landscaping or
screening as specified in subsections D and E below.
Impervious Surface -
Rural Districts RT A RR RS RE
Maximum Impervious Coverage - - - 25% 15%
Urban Residential GCC LDR MDR HDR
Maximum Impervious Coverage 30% 40% 50% 75%
Village mixed use V-LDR VMX
Maximum Impervious Coverage
Residential Lots 35% 75%
Other - No Limit
Public Facility
Maximum Parcel Area Buffer Width (Feet) Maximum Impervious Site
Coverage
0 to 5 acres 50 39.5%
5.1 to 10 acres 100 38%
10.1 to 20 acres 150 35%
Appendix 11
Establish a Water level monitoring plan – February 2018
Update Capital Improvement Plan – June 2018
Explore Cooperative Agreements for Emergency Services – March 2018
Revisit Water Rate Structure – annually
Update Ordinances and Regulations – as needed
Appendix 12
City of Lake Elmo Website
http://www.lakeelmo.org/
9/6/17
CERTIFICATE OF ADOPTION
WATER SUPPLY PLAN
City or Water System Name:
Name of Person Authorized to Sign
Certificate on Behalf of the System:
Title:
Address:
Telephone:
E-mail:
I certify that the Water Supply Plan approved by the Department of Natural Resources has been
adopted by the city council or utility board that has authority over water supply services.
Signed: Date:
Submit Certificate of Adoption through MPARS
Or mail this certificate to: DNR Waters
Water Permit Program Supervisor
500 Lafayette Road
St. Paul, MN 55155-4032
Ecological and Water Resources
1200 Warner Road
St. Paul, MN 55106
April 21, 2020
Marty Powers
Public Works Director
City of Lake Elmo
3800 Laverne Ave N, Suite 100
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
RE: Water Supply Plan Approval, City of Lake Elmo, Appropriation Permit No. 1961-1031
Dear Mr. Powers,
In accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Section 103G.291, Subdivision 3, and on behalf of the
Commissioner of the DNR, I hereby approve your Water Supply Plan submitted March 12, 2020.
Please complete the following action items to finalize the water supply planning process:
Certificate of Adoption
We encourage the City to complete the attached "Certification of Adoption" form. Please
upload the form to MPARS as an attachment as soon as the City officially adopts the Plan.
Check if you need to send an updated version of this water supply plan to Metropolitan Council
If the version of the plan submitted to us on March 12, 2020 differs from the one submitted
with your Comprehensive Plan, please send a copy of that version to your Metropolitan Council
contact. They will attach this final version of the water supply plan to your Comprehensive plan
as an appendix.
DNR and Metropolitan Council Comments
Attached to this letter is a copy of a Water Supply Plan Review checklist containing comments
from both the DNR and the Metropolitan Council. These comments should be used to improve
the management of the City of Lake Elmo water supply system and improve the next City of
Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan. We particularly would like the City of Lake Elmo to consider
short- and long-term demand reduction conditions, triggers and actions (Table 22 was
incomplete), make changes necessary to begin to track the actual unaccounted-for water
volumes (instead of estimating them at 1%), and expand efforts to reduce the peaking factor
and conserve water during the summer.
The Metropolitan Council has requested that the following comments be sent to the City of
Lake Elmo:
“Within 30 days following the adoption of the City of Lake Elmo Water Comprehensive Plan, of
which the Water Supply Plan is a part, please adopt and submit copies of the local controls
identified in the Water Supply Plan to the Metropolitan Council, as required by Minnesota
Statutes 473.865. If changes are made to the Water Supply Plan during the full comprehensive
plan update, Lake Elmo will need to submit the updated information to the DNR and
Metropolitan Council.”
Future Well Activity and Installation(s)
The approval of the City of Lake Elmo Water Supply Plan is not a pre-approval of either
proposed future volumes or proposed wells that are indicated in Table 7. According to Table 7,
the City of Lake Elmo will exceed the authorized volume of 260 million gallons per year for DNR
Water Appropriation Permit 1961-1021 this year. An amendment request must be submitted to
the DNR for increasing the authorized volume of the permit, as well as adding the new well to
the permit before it is used.
Monitoring
The DNR is pleased to see that the City of Lake Elmo is measuring water elevations in the
production wells. We ask that these data continue be submitted to the DNR Region 3
Groundwater Data Coordinator at region3s_waterdata.dnr@state.mn.us (new email address) in
the Ground Water Level Monitoring Spreadsheet on an quarterly basis.
Thank you for your efforts in planning for the future of the City of Lake Elmo water supply and for
conserving the water resources of the State of Minnesota. If you have any questions or need additional
assistance with the City's water appropriation permit, please contact me at (651) 259 - 5877.
Sincerely,
Joe Richter
District Appropriations Hydrologist
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
joe.richter@state.mn.us
CC: Sara Mielke, DNR Groundwater Hydrologist
Jack Griffin, Focus Engineering
Raya Esmaeili, Metropolitan Council Reviews Coordinator
Brian Davis, Metropolitan Council
Carmelita Nelson, DNR Water Supply Plan Coordinator
Jack Gleason, EWR South District Hydrologist Manager
Jason Spiegel; EWR Area Hydrologist
Equal Opportunity Employer