Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout06-21-2011 CCMPCity of Lake Elmo City Council Workshop 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 June 21, 2011 .30 p.m. — 6:30 p.m. ( ?) Agenda Commercial Water Rates Trunk Highway 36 Corridor Discussion Adjourn * * A social gathering /77.01' or may not be held ar the Lake Elmo !nn following the meeting.** CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-044B AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE FENCE REQUIREMENTS OF SECTION 154.120 THROUGH SECTION 154.128 TO ALLOW SOLID FENCES IN CERTAIN SITUATIONS AND TO CLARIFY THE INTENT OF OTHER SECTIONS SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by amending the following language: § 154.120 FENCE HEIGHT AND..1„,(P;:,i,,,VrIQT. (A) Fence height in street setbacks. No fence shall be constructed exceeding 42 inches in height measured from grade within any front, side(0..!ini, or rear street setback. Fences constructed within the prescribed street setback areas shall be at least 50% open to air and light. (See Figure 154.120) Figure 154.120: Height of Fencing Uwe Line Prupert Lipe — 4 7,`' t2 Ir, Wei 76% Open Abeve 42 in STREET S1DE YARD 42 in. Maxnum,.5C.% Open to Pc.rd. Light ! 72' 72" 0 11 E 42 T E E T F R 1 0 N !42 A R (B) Fence height in interior yads. No fence shall be constructed exceeding 72 inches in height measured from grade in interior yards: and, any portion of such fence above 42 inches measured from grade shall be open to light and air over 75% of the surface area. (C) .Fetice,s()1 (ii)0: as; hits, (1) Lots with 4.1111Hgti:Ott'xt,(1 ,ItOtti improved public streets at both the rear yard and the front yard, or ajoiqkhoth die side ytifti an,k1 front \,artl. may apply the standards of division (8) above for fences paralleling the rear or side yards, \\Then the riT.Ntr oroyett \liri of throws:it l e)t- the stre,,:t-sitie prqperiv coritqlc„)!. dhtits public strek.J classified ,is eitIley princival orleridl, A minor 13rpinor,40crial itt the, (it's htansportation Plan, a ience p_anitIlel to that pFoverty 1111.0: h0001-11'4111Cted t.11) tO 111 116.411t, kit 1S It l)p!„:11, 10_11111/1t 1,111d •1-111. A comer lot niUSt O01 tilUO to Illt:et 1711,110 V requirements t.-)f 96,03 (13 ) I 9 reardinu the obstruction or \ iewoitraffie„ (D) Grade defined. The grade from which fence height measurements are calculated shall only be from either natural grade or grade modified responsive to a grading plan approved by the city; and, shall not include the height of beans or introduced increases in ground elevation that would raise the effective fence height over that which would be otherwise permitted by this subchapter, except that a combination of raised grade and fence that would exceed in sum the fence height permitted by this section may be specifically approved by the City Council as an element of a subdivision plat or commercial site plan approval establishing specific property grading and topography. ) LSC111 CI c' Ili C 1 I W 1.110\VC,Ci 1)V other di isions or the fence ordinanecLand.,,other (tpplicahle sections, a 1,Cpcenrayt•te constructcd_teto (me foot off a properunless an easement is present or it is determined a fence would obstruct a drail1tt2e Etisenicnttitcseachinent Aureementlonu with a fence permit, allows a fence to be constructed within a city easement ',diet' it has been reviewed and t,' cer_antfcity council and Ikeapr j fee has been 1-cc6x,,,AL (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) § 154.121 MATERIALS. (A) Permitted fence materials. Permitted fence materials shall he limited to brick, stone, wood planks, split rail, wrought iron, and as regulated by § 15-1,123, Vinyl or composite material fences shall also be pennitted. (B) Finished lace offence. That side of the fence considered to be the face (finished side as opposed to structural supports and frame) shall face abutting property and public streets. (C) Chain link or c1'cIo,lef'nces. Chain link. and wire mesh fences are permitted to a maximum height of 72 inches measured from grade. No chain link, cyclone or wire mesh fence shall be permitted in any front. side or or rear :rti,12. setback. (See Figure 154.121) Figure 154.121: Cyclone/Chain Link Fencing S1 fi.1.7.1 SW; YARD Ci LiAe ?ropetryLtr u E l'errntted .1—eap,Vagtip,e14111,4".”9”“1-14$44b1,...1"4......... r • OA Link rermitteg ChM Linx in ck Green Orly (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) R 0 N E T .§ 154.122 FENCES IN THE SHORELAND OVERLAY DISTRICT. No fence shall be permitted in the OHW setback of any parcel located in Shoreland, as defined by § HQ1, except where the principal structure is entirely located within the OHW setback. Where the principal structure is at least partially located within the OHW setback, fences complying with the standards of § 1 54,120(B) may be constructed within the side yard area of the principal structure, but not extending beyond the front and rear exterior walls of the principal structure. Decks, porches and landings of any type shall not be considered a part of the principal structure for the purpose of determining allowable fence. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) 154.123 TEMPO RY FENCES. (A) Defined. For the purposes of this subchapter temporary fences are those that are installed and removed on a seasonal basis, such as snow fences and garden fences. Temporary fences shall be open to light and air over not less than 40% of the fence surface area. (B) Duration and limitation. No snow fence shall or posts therefore shall he installed prior to November 1, and must be removed prior to April 15. (C) Height and location. Temporary fences shall comply with the fence and fence location standards of § except that snow fences shall be set back at least 50 feet from any south or east property line, or such additional distance as inay he required to prevent the accumulation of snow on public streets or adjoining property, as determined by the Building Official. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) § 154.124 AGRICULTURAL EXEMPTION. Fences constructed on parcels in excess of 5 acres for the keeping of horses; and fences constructed on parcels in excess of 10 acres for the keeping of other livestock, as defined by § )101, are specifically exempted from the provisions of this subchapter. Any such agricultural fencing shall be at least 75% open to air and light. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) 154.125 FENCES AS SCREENING AND SECURITY, AS REQUIRED. (A) Generally. The Lake Elmo City Code and this chapter include prescribed physical circumstances of a site where screening of uses, equipment, and outside storage is required. In those prescribed circumstances, fence not to exceed 72 inches in height measured from grade may be installed, subject to the following standards: (1) Required fences for screening and security purposes in Agricultural and Residential zoning districts shall be set back from all property lines equal to the required structure set hack of the zoning district in which they are located, except where residential zoned lots share a common property line with commercial uses, or commercial zoning districts and only on the common property line between the residential and commercial parcels. (Am. Ord. 97-169, passed 5-2-2006) (2) The provisions of § 1 54.120 regarding fence height measurement from grade shall apply. No combination of earthen berm and fence may exceed the 72-inch maximum height for screening. (3) Materials used for screening shall be limited to those specified by § 134 4 (4) No such screening shall be roofed or covered in any manner. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) (5) Solid fence not to exceed 72 inches in height measured fiom grade may be installed, subject to the following standards: (a) The total area of any parcel enclosed by solid fencing shall not exceed the maximum allowable area for an accessory structure in the zoning district in which the parcel is located, less the sum of the area of any accessory structures located on the same tax parcel. (b) The area enclosed by screen fencing shall maintain a ratio of width to length of no greater than 2:1. (See § A senthot is noi raav be allow4yrovided the total 1011t2.th said tciic doe: not eNceed the Perimeter ef the laige.st pct.-inn-led in thc zoning district in which the_purcel is located. ics,s ilk: sum of the area Oi pciiipocr.)f unv uccessory- st uetuies 10Caied Oil the,ornctax parcel, (B) Outdoor living area extensions. Solid fencing to a maximum height of 72 inches may be used to enclose outdoor extended living areas of a principal structure, subject to the following standards: (1) The area enclosed by outdoor extended living area fencing shall not exceed an enclosed area of 500 square feet. (2) Fence utilized to enclose an outdoor extended living area shall be extended to a point not more than 6 inches from the principal structure at 1 fence termination point. (3) Fence utilized to enclose an outdoor extended living area shall not extend into side yard of a lot beyond the existing building line of the existing principal structure, nor shall such fences be located in any side or front street yard. (See Figure 154.125) Figure 154.125: Fencing for Outdoor Living Area Curti linr Prnprrty time STREET SIDE YARD rice to endtd,..orfr hall not eAtell ifTWSUle yard o lieyand exiae-tc Nitlaine Ole. nor shat such fences be localtrd In any side front street Solid frrictiegIC, MILKiRIVrT1 height of indir Building Line Distance from pnncipal trochee rot tn eitoeitcl 6 inchn, L. H 0 u E The area endow' by chndoor e ienotnp shaft net exceed an enclosed are of 500 equate feet Fence utilized lo enclose an outdoor extended living area Snail be extended ft> a point nal indfo than El Inches from the principal tArucltee at one lonCe leonine tion poir.t (Am. Ord. 97- 155, passed 4-19-2005) '§ 154.126 PE' ITS REQUIRED. T F R 0 Y F1 (A) Except as noted herein, installation of all fences requires a fence permit issued by the City of Lake Elmo. This permit shall he applied for on such thrills, include such documentation, and include such fees to the city for processing as may be prescribed from time to time by the City Council. Fences exempt from requiring an installation permit are limited to the following: (l ) Fences of any type installed for the sole purpose of the keeping of domestic farm animals, as defined by § 11.(11, and regulated by § f54194(E) of this Code. All such fences shall be removed by the property owner within 6 months of the termination of the keeping of domestic farm animals, unless an extension is specifically authorized by City Council action: and (2) Fences of any type installed by municipal, county or state governments and public utilities for facility security or the delineation and/or protection of public rights -of - way. (B) Failure to obtain a city fence permit prior to the installation of any fence subject to this regulation shall result in an automatic double permit fee, in addition to any 6 corrective measures to bring the fence into compliance with the standards for fences prescribed by this chapter. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) '§ 154.127 FENCES AS NON-CONFORMING/HAZARDOUS STRUCTURES. Fences shall be considered to be structures for the purposes of applying the terms of the non- conforming structure provisions of this chapter, and the hazardous structures provisions of city code and state statute. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) 154.128 OTHER PROVISIONS; CONFLICTS. To the extent that provisions of this chapter may conflict with other provisions of the city code regarding the regulation of fences and screening, the provisions of this chapter only shall apply. (Ord. 97-137, passed 8-4-2004) SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 4. Adoption Date This Ordinance No. 08-044 was adopted on this 7'1' day of June 2011, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. ATTEST: Bruce Messelt City Administrator Mayor Dean A. Johnston 7 Ordinance 08-044d (Planning Commission Recomniendation) City Council; 6/7/1/ This Ordinance No 08-044 was published on the day of 2011 (F LE City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota June 21 2011 7:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C. ATTENDANCE: Johnston Emmons, Park Pearson Smith D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: (The approved agenda is the order in which the City Council will do its business.) E. ORDER OF BUSINESS: (This is the way that the City Council runs its rneetings so everyone attending the meeting or watching the meeting understands how the City Council does its public business.) F. GROUND RULES: (These are the rules of behavior that the City Council adopted for doing its public business.) G. ACCEPT MINUTES: 1. Accept June 7, 2011 City Council Minutes H. PUBLIC COMMENTS/INQUIRIES: In order to be sure that anyone wishing to speak to the City Council is treated the same way, meeting attendees wishing to address the City Council on any items NOT on the regular agenda may speak for up to three minutes, . CONSENT AGENDA: (Items are placed on the consent agenda by City staff and the Mayor because they are not anticipated to generate discussion, Items may be removed at City Council's request.) 2, Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 3, Letter of Support for Amendment to MN Rules for MPCA Landfill Siting Requirements 4. Resolution Affirming Participation in the Office of the State Auditor's Voluntary 2011 Performance Measurement Program; Res. No, 2011-022 5. Consider Amended 2011 Fee Schedule; Ordinance 08-045 6, PUD Amendment: Bremer Bank Parking Lot Expansion; Res. No. 2011-023 7. Downtown District Sidewalk Maintenance Project - Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Obtain Contractor Options REGULAR AGENDA: 8. Recruitment for/Appointment to Planning Commission: Ordinance Revision and Appointments; Ordinance No. 08-046 9, Southern Lake Elmo: Process, Goals and Vision. Review of Draft Policy Document Concerning the Vision and Goals for the 1-94 Planning Committee K. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS; (These are verbal updates and do not have to be formally added to the agenda.) • Mayor and City Council • Administrator: Update on Library, Springsted and Animal Control • City Engineer • City Attorney • Planning Director 10. Adjourn L. EXECUTIVE SESSION: To Discuss litigation strategies and direction relating to the City of Lake Elmo vs. 3M **A social gathering may or may not be held at the Lake Elmo Inn following the meeting,** DRAFT City of Lake Elmo City Council Meeting Minutes June 7, 2011 Mayor Johnston called the meeting to order at 7:00 p,m, PRESENT: Mayor Johnston and Council Members Emmons (7:04), Park, Pearson, and Smith Also Present: Administrator Messelt, Attorney Snyder, and City Engineers Griffin and Stempski, Planning Director Klatt, Finance Director Bouthilet and City Clerk Lumby, APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: Council Member Pearson moved to approve the June 7, 2011 City Council Agenda as amended. ADD: Agenda Item No 10: Summer Schedule for Workshops. Council Member Park seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-0-1 (Emmons abstained from voted as he just arrived at meeting.) ACCEPTED MINUTES: The May 17, 2011 City Council minutes, as amended, were accepted by consensus of the City Council, PUBLIC COMMENTS: Judy Mitchell, Lake Elmo VFW Auxiliary, presented a POW/MIA flag to the City Council, Dave Engstrom, Friends of Washington County, presented the proposed amendments to Minnesota Rules for MPCA Landfill Siting Requirements, The State Legislature adopted new statutory requirements and MPCA has promulgated proposed Amendments to the MN Rules Chapter 7001 and 7035 to implement the new statutory requirements, The City Council directed the City Administrator to draft a letter from the City in support of the proposed amendments, CONSENT AGENDA: MOTION: Council Member Smith moved to approve the Consent Agenda, as presented. Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll in the amount of $230,685.50 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2011 REGULAR AGENDA AGENDA: Draft Amendment to Fence Ordinance — Ordinance No. 08-044 & Resolution 2011-021 The City Council was requested to review the ordinance that was drafted to allow solid fences up to 72 inches in height through lots where the rear yard is adjacent to high traffic roadways under certain circumstances. Planner Klatt reported that on May 3, 2011 the City Council directed staff to draft an ordinance amending the fence code to allow solid fences to be constructed up to 72 inches in height for those lot lines abutting major roadways on through (double frontage) lots, Option A allows solid fences in the rear yards of through lots that abut roads classified as a principal arterial (such as Highway 36) and A minor arterial (such as Manning Avenue South of Highway 5) or a B minor arterial (Lake Elmo Avenue between Highway 5 and 101h Street). The Planning Commission reviewed the draft ordinance, held a public hearing and provided a recommendation that included amendments to the draft ordinance (Option B) allowing a solid fence to be constructed up to 72 inches in height along those same roadways previously identified, but also when it is a side or corner yard. The Commission found that if screening fences were allowed on through lots that abut major roadways, then it should also be acceptable to allow such fences along corner lots that are located adjacent to the fence ordinance. Planner Klatt also pointed out that a fence cannot be erected in the OHWM in the shoreland overlay district. A resident spoke in support of the ordinance, but stated that he would like to be able to extend a solid fence to all sides of his lot. He suggested reducing the variance fee for fence variances. Council Member Smith pointed out the fence would look very odd if the third leg of the fence is not the same size as the overall fence, MOTION: Council Member Smith moved to approve Ordinance No. 08-044A as recommended by the Planning Department except for (c) on page 5 until a diagram is received describing (c). Council Member Park seconded the motion, MOTION: Mayor Johnston moved to arnend the motion by reinserting (c) as proposed by staff. Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 4-1(Council Member Smith voting against.) MOTION. Council Member Smith moved to approve Ordinance No, 08-044A as recommend& by the Planning Department and Resolution No. 2011-021 for publication. Council Member Park seconded the motion, The motion passed 4-1. (Council Member Smith voted against). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2011 2 MOTION.. Council Member Park movedAgenda Item No. 9 Commercial Water Rate for discussion, Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. Commercial Water Rate - Discussion The City Council voted to table this issue from the May 17 Council meeting to the May 24 workshop for further discussion, but it was cancelled because of a lack of quorum. The City Council approved the water conservation rate in 2009 in order to comply with state requirements, but the new system has led to unintended spikes in water bills for business like hotels and restaurants that require large volumes of water for their operation. Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director, presented a number of alternative billing arrangements such as the seasonal rate system. The Staff recommends the City pass on the alternatives and instead modifies its current system, which breaks down businesses and residences into usage tiers with escalating charged per 1,000 gallons used. He said the challenge for the City is to find a way to satisfy state requirements, city revenue needs and commercial users with one system. Mo French, Wildwood Lodge, stated she appreciated the efforts of the Council and staff, but said the sooner changes are made the better. This agenda item will be discussed at the next City Council workshop, Kindred Court Drainage Corrections: Approve plan and order design The City Council was asked to consider approving the Kindred Court Drainage Corrections project in 2011 by authorizing design, directing staff to obtain contractor quotes, and retaining a contractor to complete the work for a not to exceed total project amount of $44,200. Due to a minimal street grade and localized settlement on the street in this area, the roadway has not drained properly over the past several years. The trapped water is a hazard and will continue to further deteriorate the roadway if left unrepaired. The captive water creates a pond in the roadway centered at the end of the driveway at 3720 Kindred Court. During freezing conditions, an ice patch forms in this area that covers over half the road. The Public Works Department has made multiple attempts to correct the issue. Corrective work for Kindred Court is not part of the City's Street Capital Improvement Plan, Funding for this project would need to come from the street maintenance funds, which, for the 2011 Budget, is already 100% dedicated. This is not an assessable project. The Finance Department identified two funding alternatives. MOTION: Mayor Johnston moved to approve the Kindred Court Drainage Corrections project to be constructed in 2011 andfunded through Bond proceeds for the 2011 Street LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2011 Improvement Bonds, for a not to exceed amount of $44,200, Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0, Public Medina: Annual Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Report for 2010 and accept MS4 Annual Report Ryan Stempski, Assistant City Engineer, reported the City Council is being asked to conduct the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) permit program Public Annual meeting and accept the 2010 MS4 Annual Report. Mayor Johnston opened the public meeting and there was no one to speak for or against the Report. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved to accept the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Annual Reportfor 2010, and authorize staff to submit this report to the MPCA by June 30, 2011, Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0. Roles. Responsibilities and Functions of Subcommittees Council Member Emmons asked the City Council if it was comfortable with Human Resource/Personnel Subcommittee working with Council -Staff relations. Consensus of the Council was that it was comfortable with the work of the HR/Personnel Subcommittee. Discussion ensued regarding the efficacy of continuing with topics specific Subcommittees or migrating to a "committee of a whole" approach to topics and issues currently addressed via the Subcommittees. Consensus of the Council was to leave the current Subcommittee structure in place as is and review at the end of the year. The Council extended an invitation to the Planning Commission to attend Council meetings on major issues. Yellow Ribbon Network; Resiwiation of Jennifer Pelletier Jennifer Pelletier has resigned her position as Chair of Beyond the Yellow Ribbon, The Council discussed the process of filling this position. Council Members Park and Smith will continue to contact interested residents, while Mayor Johnston indicated finding a Chair was not the role of the Council, but of the organization. . The Council recognized Jennifer Pelletier for her efforts and extended service on the Beyond the Yellow Ribbon. Lake Elmo Avenue Infrastructure Project from 1-94 to 30w Street The City Council was requested to consider approving a Resolution, Accepting Bids and Awarding the contract for the Lake Elmo Avenue Infrastructure Project, 1-94 to 30th LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2011 4 Street, Bids were received on April 19, 201, The City can retain the bids together with the bid securities for nor more than 60 days from the date of the bid opening (or until June 19, 2011), MOTION: Mayor Johnston moved to reject the bids received for the Lake Elmo Avenue Infrastructure Project from I-94 to 30th Street based on: • Absence of easements conveyed • Unfavorable bid results • Decline of housing market Council Member Pearson seconded the motion. The motion passed 5-0, City Council Reports: Council Member Smith asked for a supporting invoice from Springsted, Inc. for number of hours it has worked on the HR/Organizational Personnel Related matters for the last 21 days, MOTION: Council Member Smith moved to request Springsted, Inc, submit a running tally of time incurred to date of work done on the HR/Organizational Personnel Related matters. Council Member Park seconded the motion. The motion failed 1-4 (Mayor Johnston, Council Members Emmons, Park and Pearson voting against.) The City Council adjourned the meeting at 10:23 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MEETING JUNE 7, 2011 5 7 "AAKE ELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 06/21/2011 CONSENT ITEM #: 2 MOTION as part of Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the Amount of $ 169,227.27 SUBMITTED BY: Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director THROUGH: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: City Staff SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $169,227.27 No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operation. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # Amount Description ACH $ 7,844.50 Payroll Taxes to IRS 06/16/2011 ACH $ 1,327.43 Payroll Taxes to MN Dept. of Revenue 06/16/2011 ACH $ 3,993.77 Payroll Retirement to PERA 06/16/2011 DD3373 — DD3409 S 25,496.80 Payroll Dated 06/16/2011 (Direct Deposit) 37088 —37171 $ 4,934.00 Payroll Dated 06/16/2011 37172 —37219 $ 125,227.77 Accounts Payable Dated 06/21/2011 TOTAL 169,227.72 -- page 1 -- City Council Meeting proval of Disbursements June 21, 201 I Consent Agenda Item #2 STAFF REPORT: City staff has complied and reviewed the attached set of claims. All appears to be in order and consistent with City budgetary and fiscal policies and Council direction RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda proposed disbursements in the amount of 169,227.77 Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda or a particular claim from this item and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the June 21st, 2011, Disbursements as Presented [and modified] herein." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Accounts Payable Dated 06/21/2011 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS Questions from Council to Staff Call for Motion .... ..„.....,....„„.., Discussion ........... ,,,..,... Action on Motion, „....„.... ....... „. f removed from the Consent Agenda): .„. ........... ..... ............, ........... Mayor Facilitates ...„ ................... ......,...... Mayor & City Council ,..„ „ ...... .......... ....„.. Mayor & City Council ,..,...„................„.......... ....... . Mayor Facilitates — page 2 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: joan z Printed: 06/16/2011 - 12:32 PM Batch: 003-06-2011 Invoice it Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # ABRAHAMS Abrahamson Nurseries 23149 05/26/2011 187.47 0.00 06121/2011 Mulch City Sign on Keats 4 111-480-8000-45200 Buildings and Structures 23149 Total: 187.47 24516 06/02/2011 11.779.00 0.00 06/21/2011 MN Dot Gram Reirnb Landscaping 101-430-3100-44030 Repairs/Manit Imp Not Bldp HWY 5 24516 Total: 11,779.00 ABRAHAMS Total: 11.966.47 ADVENTUR Adventure Marine MFG 4008 06/0112011 310.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Replacement Prop Guard for Boat 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 4008 Total: 310.00 ADVENTUR Total: 110.00 ALEXAJR. Alex Air Apparatus. Inc 19934 06/03'2011 81.60 0-00 06/21/2011 Repair Coupling on hydraulic line El 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 19934 Total: 81.60 ALEXAIR Total: 81.60 ARAM Aramark, 629-7250833 05126/2011 47.91 0.00 06/21/2011 Uniforms 101-430-3100-441 70 Uniforms 629-7250833 Total: 47.91 629-7255576 06/02/2011 21.29 0.00 06/21/2011 Uniforms 101-430-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7255576 Total: 21,29 629-7257331 06/06/2011 115,38 0.00 06/21/2011 Linen City Hall 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg 629-7257331 Total: 115.38 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 1 Invoice # Inv Date 629-7260220 06/09/2011 101-430-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7260220 Total:. 629-7261972 06/13/2011 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs(Maint Bldg 629-7261972 Total: 629-7261973 06/13/2011 101-420-2220-44010 RepairsiMaint Bldg 629-7261973 Total: ARAM Total: Amount *Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 21.29 0.00 06/21/2011 Uniforms No 0000 21,29 75.99 0.00 06/21'2011 Monthly Rug service Station #2 No 0000 75.99 7531 0.00 06/21/2011 Monthly Rug set -vice Station #1 No 0000 75.31 357,17 BIFFS 130 s Inc. Multiple 06/01'2011 632 89 0.00 06/2112011 Portable Restrooms No 0000 101-450-5200 44120 Rentals - Buildings Multiple Total: 632.89 BIFFS Total: 632.89 BU FLOW Buelow Excavating 6556 04/01/2011 5,040.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Contract Snow Plowing No 0000 101-430-3125-43150 Conn -act Services 6556 Total: 5,040.00 BUELOW Total: 5,040.00 BURBBLAC Barber] Black Dirt, Inc. 13608 06103/2011 222_73 0.00 06/21/2011 131ack Dirt No 0000 101-430-3125-42250 Landscaping Materials 13608 06/03/2011 255.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Black Dirt City Sign Keats No 0000 410-480-8000-45200 Buildings and Structures 13608 Total: 477.73 BURBBLAC Total: 477.73 COMCAST COMCAST 05127/2011 05/27/2011 7.90 0.00 06/21/2011 Monthly Service No 0000 101-420-2220-44300 Miscellaneous 05/27/2011 Total: 7.90 COMCAST Total: 7,90 CTYBLOOM City of Bloomington May 2011 05/26/2011 40.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Lab Bacteria Tests No 0000 601-494-9400-42270 Utility System Maintenance May 2011 Total: 40.00 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Page 2 Invoice # Inv Date CTYBLOOM Total: CTYOAKDA City of Oakdale 10000460-01 06/30/2011 601-494-9400-43820 Water Utility 10000460-01 Total: 201105312757 05/31/2011 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 201105312757 Total: CTYOAKDA Total* CTYROSEV City of Roseville 0214716 06/16/2011 101-410-1450-43180 Information Technology!Web 0214716 Total' CTYROSEV Total: ECKBERG Ecl<berg Lamers Briggs Wolff 05-2011 05/31/2011 101-420-2150-43045 Attorney Criminal 05-2011 Total: 111918 05/31/2011 I 01-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 111918 05131/2011 203-490-9070-43040 Legal Services 111918 Total: ECKBERG Total: EMMONS A Emmons Alex 06/07:2011 06/07/2011 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 06/07/2011 Total: EMMONS A Total: ENVENTIS ENVENTIS 737500 06/01/2011 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 737500 Total: 738507 06/01/2011 101-410-1940-43210 Telephone 738507 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine 40.00 12.471.29 12.471 29 1.512.36 1,512.36 13.983.65 1,551.5l3 1,551.58 1,551,58 3,760.04 3,760.04 6,279.32 97.50 6,376.82 10.136,86 55.00 55.00 55.00 453.57 453.57 565,23 565.23 0.00 06/21/2011 Water Servic-e194 0.00 06/21/2011 Repairs to LI 0.00 06/21/2011 Monthly IT Services - June 2011 0.00 062112011 Legal Services Prosecution May 2011 0.00 06/21/2011 - Civil 0.00 06/21/2011 Legal Services- Development 0.00 06/21/2011 Cabled Mtg - CC Meeting 6/7/2011 0.00 06/21/201I TelephoneiData Service- PW May 2011 0.00 06/21/2011 Telephone/Data Service -CH June 2011 No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 3 invoice # inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference ENVENT1S Total: 1.018.80 Task Type FO # Close POLine # HARTMAN Hartman Homes Chk Req 06/08/2011 3,000.00 0.00 06(2112011 Escrow Return 9149 Lake Jane Trail No 0000 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07738 Chk Req Total: 3,000.00 HARTMAN Total- 3.000.00 JIBLLC JIB, LLC Chk Req 06/16/2011 300.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Refund Overpayment due to Keying No 0000 603-000-0000-37100 Surface Water Utility Sales error Clik Req Total: 300.00 J1BLI C Total: 300.00 JOHN SONK Johnson Kristine 06/08/2011 06/08/2011 37.14 0.00 06/21/2011 Reimbursement for MSFDA No 0000 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & Training 06/08/2011 Total: 37.14 JOHNSONK Total: 37.14 LEOIL Lake Elmo Oil, Inc. 05/31/2011 05/31/2011 394.66 0.00 06/21/2011 Fuel No 0000 101-420-2220-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 05/31/2011 Total: 394.66 11768 05123/2011 1,644_83 0.00 06/21/2011 Fuel No 0000 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel. Oil and Fluids 11768 Total: 1,644.83 LEOIL Total: 2,039.49 Lillie Newspapers Inc_ Lillie Suburban 05/31/2011 05/31/2011 217.51 0.00 06/21/2011 Public Notices No 0000 101A10-1450-435 30 Public Notices 05/31/2011 Total: 217.51 Lillie Total: 217.51 LINNER Linnet- Electric Company, Inc. 21609 06/13/2011 100.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Electric Work for New Entrance Sign No 0000 101-430-3100-44030 Repaits/Maint Imp Not Bidgs 21609 Total: 100.00 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Page 4 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Prnt Date Description Reference LINNER Total; 100.00 Task Type PO # Close POLine # LOFF Loftier Companies, Inc_ 1255775 06/02/2011 217.42 0.00 06171/2011 Copy Machines Overage & Base June No 0000 101-410-1940-44040 Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt 2011 1255775 Total: 217.42 LOFF Total: 217.42 MARONEYS Maroney's Sanitation. Inc 001398 06/06/2011 108.30 0.00 06/21/2011 Waste Removal - City Hall No 0000 101-410-1940-43840 Refuse 001398 06/06/2011 47.68 0.00 96/21/2011 Waste Removal - Fire No 0000 101-420-2220-43840 Refuse 001398 06/06/2011 207 82 0.00 06/21/2011 Waste Removal'- Public Works No 0000 101-430-3100-43840 Refuse 001398 06/06/2011 207.82 0.00 06/21/2011 Waste Removal - Parks No 0000 101-450-5200-43840 Refuse 001398 Total: 571.62 MARONEYS Total: 571.62 MBFTE MN Board of Firefighter Train 06/08/2011 06108/2011 101-420-2220-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 06/0812011 Total: MBFTE Total: 75.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Required Licensing for Chief Malmquist 75.00 75.00 MENARDSO Menards -Oakdale 06/07/2011 06/07/2011 37.91 0.00 06/21/2011 Station #1 items 101-420-2220-44010 Repairsilvlaint Bldg 06/07/2011 Total: 37.91 77204 06/02/2011 40.01 0.00 06/21/2011 Sign Finish Materials 101-450-5200-42250 Landscaping Materials 77204 Total: 40.01 79861 06/09/2011 45.47 0.00 06/21/2011 VFW New Fountain Parts 404-480-8000-45300 Improvements Other Than Bldgs 79861 Total: 45.47 82108 06/15/2011 16.00 0,00 06/21/2011 Shrink Wrap 101-430-3100-42150 Shop Materials 82108 Total: 16.00 MENARDSO Total: 139.39 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 5 Invoice # Div Date MENARDST Menards - Stillwater 89458 06/16/2011 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 89458 Total: MENARDST Total: METCOU Metropolitan Council 0000961815 06/02/2011 602-495-9450-43820 Sewer Utility - Met Council 0000961815 Total: METCOU Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task 13.97 0.00 06121/2011 Cleanning Supplies 13.97 13.97 1,282 98 0,00 06/21/2011 Monthly Wastewater Service.- July 2011 1,282.98 1,282.98 METRO MU METROPOLITAN MUNICIPALITIES ASSOC1 565 05120/2011 20.00 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 565 Total: METRO MU Total: METROF1R Metro Fire 41196 05/26/2011 101-420-2220 41040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 41196 Total: 41272 06i06n01 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 41272 Total: METROFIR Total: M1LLEREX Miller Excavating. Inc. 15482 05/26/2011 101-430-3120-43150 Contract Services 15482 Total: 15500 05/31/2011 410-480-8000-45200 Buildings and Structures 15500 Total: MILLEREX Total: MN NATIV Minnesota Native Landscapes 6767 07/08/2011 101-450-5200-44030 Repairs/Maint Imp Not lidgs 6767 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) 20.00 20.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Training Conference 63.12 0.00 06/21/2011 Repair/replace SCBA restaining on El 63.12 478.07 0.00 06/21/2011 Replace damaged fitting on E2 478.07 541.19 1,112.40 0.00 06/21/2011 Grading Gravel Roads 1,312.40 474.91 0.00 06/21/2011 Boulders for City Sign on Keats 474.91 1,587.31 1,150.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Prairie Restoration - Sunfish Lake Park - 1,150.00 Type PO # Close POLine # No No No 0000 0000 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 6 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference MN NATIV Total: 1,150.00 MTI MTI Distributing Inc. 789379-00 05'31/2011 286.69 0.00 06/21;2011 Mower Blades 101-450-5200-42210 Equipment Parts 789379-00 Total: 286.69 MTI Total: 286.69 NORTHL Northland Trust Services, inc. LKEL0913 05104/2011 6.731.25 0.00 06/21/2011 GO Improvement Bond Series 2009 B 316-470-7000-46110 Bond Interest int LKELO9B Total: 6,731.25 NORTH'', Total: 6,73125 PRESSA Anastasia Press 06/13/2011 06/1312011 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Op .r•ations 06/13/2011 Total: PRESSA Total: RIVRCOOP River Country Cooperative 05/31/201 I 05/3112011 101-420-2220-42120 Fuel. 011 and Fluids 05/31/2011 Total: RIVRCOOP Total: ROGERS Rogers Printing Services, Corp 17919 06/08/2011 101-430-3200 44300 Miscellaneous 17919 Total: ROGERS Total: Task Type PO # Close POLine # No 0000 Nc 0000 55.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Mtg Cabled Planning Commission No 0000 55.00 55.00 1.232.66 0.00 06/21/2011 Fuel 1,232.66 1,232.66 358.03 0.00 96/2 inot I Clean up Flyer 358.03 358.03 RT,JD Prince-Rud Diane 06/21/2011 06/21/2011 240.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Cleaning City Hall & Annex 101-410-1940 44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg 06/21/2011 06/21/2011 180.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Cleaning Fire Hall 101-420-2220 44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 06/21/2011 06/21/2011 5.42 0.00 06/21/2011 Supplies 101-410-1940-42110 Cleaning Supplies 06/21/2011 Total: 425.42 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 7 Invoice # by Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # RUD Total: 425.42 STEICHEN STEICHEN'S SPORTING GOODS 219980 06/0312011 101-450-5200-44030 Repairs/Maint Imp Not Bldgs 219980 Total: STEICHEN Total: 43.18 0.00 06/21/2011 Home Plates (3 each) 43.18 43.18 S1 LTNMAN Steinman Tom 06/08/2011 06/08/2011 54.17 0.00 06/21/2011 Reimbursement for MSFDA 101-420-2220 14370 Conferences & Training 06/08(2011 06/08/201i 25_01 0.00 06/21/2011 Fuel Reimibursement for MSFDA 101-420-2220-43310 Mileage 06/08/2011 Total: 79.18 STEINMAN Total: 79.18 STILLMED Stillwater Medical Group 1340 06/07/2011 334.42 0.00 06/21/2011 Annual Physicals, Winkels. Goodspeed - 101-420-2220-43050 Physicals 1340 Total: 334.42 ST1LLMED Total: 334.42 TASCH T.A Schifskv & Sons Inc 51334 06/01/2011 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 51334 Total: TASCH Total: 603.46 0.00 06/21/2011 Asphalt 603.46 603.46 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 TDS TDS METROCOM - LLC 651-779-8882 06/02/2011 166.08 0.00 06/21/2011 Analog Lines - Fire - No 0000 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 651-779-8882 06/02/2011 155.79 0.00 06/21/2011 _Analog Lines - Public Works No 0000 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 651-7/9-8882 06/02/2011 104.88 0.00 06/21/2011 Analog Lines - Lift Station Alarms - No 0000 602-495-9450-43210 Telephone 651-779-8882 06/02/2011 4228 0.00 06/21/2011 Alarrn - Well House #2 No 0000 601-494-9400-43210 Telephone 651-779-8882 Total: 469.03 TDS Total: 469.03 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Page 8 Invoice # lnv Date TESSMAN Tessman Company Corp S143 8885-IN 06/02/2011 601-494-9400-14030 Repairs \Maint Imp Not Bldgs S 1438885-IN Total: TESSMAN Total: TKDA TKDA, Inc. 00201 1001442 06/16/2011 413-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002011001442 Total: 002011001443 06/16/2011 417-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002011001443 Total: 002011001444 06/16/2011 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 00201 1001444 Total: 002011001445 06/16/2011 418-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 0020110014-45 Total: 002011001448 06/16/2011 101-420-2400-43030 Engineering 002011001448 06/16/2011 101-410-1910-43030 Engineering Services 002011001448 06/16/2011 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002011001448 06/16r2011 404-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002011001448 06/16/2011 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering Services 002011001448 06/16/2011 603-496-9500-43030 Engineering Services 002011001448 Total: 002011001449 06/16/2011 203-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 002011001449 Total: 002011001450 06/16/2011 203-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 002011001450 Total: 002011001451 06/16/2011 10I -43 0-3 1 00-43030 Engineering Services 002011001451 06/16/2011 101-410-1930-43030 Engineering Services 002011001451 06/16/2011 I 01-410-19 / 0-43030 Engineering Services AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference 40.08 0.00 06/21/2011 Erosion Blanket, water mai n break, retor 40.08 40.08 5.166.01 0.00 06/21/2011 194 to 30th Street - Village Sanitary 5,166_01 1,446.22 0.00 06/21/2011 Lake Elmo 2010 Street & Water Quality 1,446.22 389.37 0.00 06/21/2011 Lake Elmo Water Systems Strategies 389.37 8,287.44 0.00 06/2.11201 1 2011 Street Improvement/Water Quality 919.70 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering - VRA 3.054.20 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering - VRA 4,455,48 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering- VRA 1,636.50 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering - VRA 4,023 17 0,00 06/21/2011 General Engineering - VRA 2,91532 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering - VRA 8,287_44 17.004.37 261.32 0.00 06/21/2011 'Development- Whistling Valley III 261.32 647.58 0.00 06/21/2011 Development - Sanctuary 647.58 316_35 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering 3,534.65 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering 48.68 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering Task Type PO # Close POLine # No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 9 Invoice # Inv Date 002011001451 061612011 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering SeMces 002011001451 Total: 002011001453 06/16/2011 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 00201100 453 Total: TKDA Total: TRKUTI Truck Utilities 226920 06/102011 101-430-3100-42210 Equipment Parts 226920 Total: TRKUTI Total: VISA-SL VISA 06[2672011 06/26/201 101-410-1110-44300 Miscellaneous 06/26/2011 Total: VISA-SL Total: WAS-TRAN Washington County 20498 05/28/2011 101-450-5200-44030 RepairsiMaint lmp Not Bldgs 20498 Total: WAS-TRAN Total: WASHTAX Washington County 1821 06102:2011 603-496-9500 4,1300 Miscellaneous Expenses 1821 Total: 69382 07/01/2011 101-410-1320-43100 Assessing Services 69382 Total: 69389 07/01/2011 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 69389 Total: 69431 06/11/2011 101-410-1320-43100 Assessing Services 69431 Total: WASHTAX Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (06/16/11 - 12:32 PM) Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 2,175.29 0.00 06/21/2011 General Engineering No 0000 6,074.97 1,949.46 0.00 06/21;2011 2011 Seal Coat Project No 0000 1,949.46 41,226.74 42.93 0.00 06/21/2011 Hyd Hose Parts No 0000 42.93 42.93 129.54 0.00 06/21/2011 Food - Board of Review & ECFE/CC No 0000 Mtg 129.54 129.54 3,169.79 0.00 06/21[2011 Sunfish Lake Trail Grooming No 0000 3,169.79 3,169.79 138.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Document Copies for Rain Garden No 0000 138.00 4,509.84 0.00 06/21/2011 Manufactured Home Assessments No 0000 4,509.84 4,000.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Legal Property Tax Appeals No 0000 4,000.00 874.00 0.00 06/21/2011 Pay 2011 Special Assessment Billing No 0000 874.00 9,521.84 Page 10 „.. Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference XCEL Xoel Energy 51-4504807-7 06/16,201194.04 0.00 06/21/2011 Lights at Legion Park 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 06/16/2011 80.97 0_00 06/21/2011 Lift Station 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 06/16/2011 30.70 0_00 06/21/2011 Traffic Lights 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4504807-7 Total: 305.71 51-5275289-3 06/16/2011 9_95 0.00 06/21/2011 Pebble Park 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-5275289-3 Total: 9.95 51-5356323-8 06/16/2011 1,402.64 0.00 06/21f2011 Wells 1 & 2 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility 51-5356323-8 Total: 1.402.64 51-6736544-2 06/16/2011 1_874.99 0.00 06/2112011 Street Lights 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-6736544-2 Total: 1,874.99 51-6956201-4 06/16/2011 316.29 0.00 06121/2011 VFW Ballfield Lts 101-4.50-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-6956201-4 Total: 316.29 51-8126093-5 06/16/2011 19.28 0.00 06a1/2011 Water Tower 2 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility 51-8126093-5 Total: 19.28 XCEL TotaE 3,928.86 Report Total: 125,630.77 AP - To Be Paid Prof List (06/16/T 1 - 12:32 PM) Task Type PO # Close POLine # No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 11 4 LAKE ELMO AYOF? & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION 6/21/2011 Letter of Support for Amendment to Minnesota Rules for MPCA Landfill Siting Requirements Bruce Messelt, City Administrator Mayor and City Council Request Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Dave Snyder, City Attorney Jack Griffin, City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to authorize as part of tonight's Consent Agenda the execution of Letter of Support for proposed amendments to the Minnesota Rules, chapter 7001 and 7035 delineating additional siting requirements for MPCA approval of certain landfills. Authorization of the conveyance of the requested letter is required tonight in order to meet the June 24th, 2011 deadline. •BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City has been supportive of efforts by the Friends of Washington County and other organizations to address concerns regarding siting of landfills where groundwater contamination is more likely. The State Legislature adopted new statutory requirements and MPCA has promulgated proposed Amendments to the Minnesota Rules Chapters 7001 and 7035 to implement the new statutory requirements. STAFF REPORT: On June 7th, the Friends of Washington County presented the proposed Amendments to the Mayor and City Council. At that meeting, the City Council directed the City Administrator to draft a letter from the City in support of the proposed Amendments. The attached letter has been drafted and reviewed by the City Attorney, Engineer and Planner. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon previous Council direction, the above background information and staff report, it is recommended that the City Council approve the Letter of Support as part of tonight's Consent Agenda. -- page 1 -- City Council Meeting June 21st, 20 l I Letter of Support for MPCA Landfill Rules Consent Agenda Item # 3 Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda and further discuss, deliberate and, if appropriate, amend the recommended motion prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the proposed Letter of Support for proposed amendments to the Minnesota Rules, chapter 7001 and 7035 delineating additional siting requirements for MPCA approval of certain landfills, as presented [and modified/amended] at tonight's meeting." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Letter of Support 2. Draft Letter of Support from Friends of Washington County 3. MPCA Notice of Intent to Adopt Rules without a Public Hearing SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Aeenda): - Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion Mayor & City Council - Discussion Mayor Facilitates Action on ........ .. ...... ....... ............... .............. Mayor & City Council -- page 2 -- DF 41‘ LAKE ELMO DRAFT City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North 0 Lake Elmo, MN 55042 • www,lakeelmo.org Phone: (651) 777-5510 Fax: (651) 777-9615 June 22nd, 2011 Mr. Nathan Cooley Minnesota Pollution Control Agency - Municipal Division 520 Lafayette Road 2798 Jamley Ave N. St. Paul, MN 55155 Re: Comments Regarding Proposed Amendment to Minnesota Rules, Chapter 7001 and 7035 (New Part 7001.3111 Additional Siting Requirements for Certain Landfills that Have Not Received a Permit before January 1, 2011; and Revised Part 7035.2525 Solid Waste Management Facilities Governed) Dear Mr. Cooley; Thank you for the opportunity for the City of Lake Elmo, MN and other interested parties and individuals to submit written comments regarding the proposed rules. On behalf of the Lake Elmo City Council, the City suppports the proposed rules and finds these concise, well developed and consistent with the statutory requirements and intent of the underlying legislation. In addition, the proposed rules balance well the objectives of preservation of current and future groundwater resources, varied geographic, geologic and geomorphic conditions, and appropriate siting, construction and management of needed current and future landfills within the State of Minnesota. Such rules compromise neither needed environmental protection nor legitimate economic and regulatory consideration in the reasonable siting, construction and management of current and future landfills. Thank you again for soliciting written comments regarding the proposed rules. Sincerely; Bruce A. Messelt City Admininstrator Attachment(s): None CC: Honorable Mayor and City Council Members, City of Lake Elmo Mr. Jack Griffin, TKDA, City Engineer Official File page 1 RO. Box 2058 Stillwater, MN T 55082 651.491,1981 fitendsofWashco,org ROAltD OF DIRECTORS One Vug si rum AlIioe Dociun Chuck fins Hugo Maty.1.1duscl wdod Barry John,soil Woodbury Day du ohm- - Srillwarer Peg UMWTI LkIinJ ./(11111 Lei leo • May lowils hip Lea Price Wondhury Rogdr Len - Si dim ter HONORARY BOARD Min Fii2p4trick - Deoindri; David l Inn well Minneapolis Jae K1 eniz Ntiy Township Dick Stafford • Woodhull EKED. rf1vE DIRECiNI Marc top -Julio (44 ni Date: To: From: Re: DRAFT June 13, 2011 Nathan Cooley, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Friends of Washington County DRA1-1 COMMENTS FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL ' Proposed Amendment to Minnesota Rules, Chapters 7001 and 7035 (New Part 7001.3111 Additional Siting Requirements for Certain Landfills that Have Not Received a Permit before January 1, 2011; and Revised Part 7035.2525 Solid Waste Management Facilities Governed) Friends of Washington County (FWC) is submitting comments in support of the above referenced rule change. These comments reiterate many of the arguments we have made throughout the rulemaking process. Subp. 3(A). FWC supports the concept that landfills are inherently safer when they are sited in areas with slower groundwater flow velocities and a longer predicted minimum travel time. Faster velocities and sandier soils may allow for earlier detection of leaks and easier remediation, but the objective of landfill siting should be containment rather than cleanup of leaking contaminants. The proposed minimum travel time of 100 days is loosely based on requirements for compliance boundary setbacks and monitoring intervals. We feel it is a workable criterion, A predicted travel time of more than 100 days would not be sufficiently protective of human health and the environment. FWC would like to stress that predicted travel times should be based on field tests (testable and objective criteria) such as dye tracing rather than on modeling alone. Models have proven to be notoriously inaccurate at predicting groundwater contaminant flow, primarily due to the large number and complexity of variables affecting the underground environment. In areas where karst may be present, field tests and modeling should be conducted by a professional geologist who has training and experience in karst terrains. Subp. 3(C). FWC supports a waste area setback from karst features. The presence of karst features in the vicinity of a proposed landfill is a strong indicator that karst exists or may develop in the landfill footprint (out to the compliance boundary). However, we feel that 200 feet is a minimal setback distance. FWC previously proposed and still supports a setback of 1000 feet, but a setback of 200 ft is acceptable. A setback of less than 200 ft would not represent a reasonable interpretation of the scientific data, and would not be sufficiently protective of human health and the environment. (continued on page 2) AFT DRAFT Comments Landfill Siting Requirements June 13, 2011 Subp. 3(D). FWC strongly supports the concept that greater separation between the waste and the carbonate bedrock will reduce the potential for future karst development within the waste footprint (out to the compliance boundary). Since karst development can lead to structural instability and rapid groundwater movement, reducing the potential for karst development is protective of human health and the environment. The vertical separation distance of 50 feet is reasonable and is acceptable. Clearly a greater separation distance would be more protective, and smaller separation distance would be less protective. The 50 foot distance is supported by scientific evidence. Research conducted by Dr. Calvin Alexander at the University of Minnesota shows that more than 90 percent of karst features that can be identified at the identified at the surface are located in areas with 50 feet or less of unconsolidated material over bedrock. A separation distance of less than 50 feet in the regulations would be unreasonable and would not be sufficiently protective of human health and the environment. If future landfills must be sited in areas with less than 50 feet of undisturbed, unconsolidated material, the burden of proof should fall on the proposer to demonstrate why the location is inherently safe. The concept of undisturbed, unconsolidated overburden is a critical part of Subp. 3(D). Karst can develop whenever there is a change, either positive or negative, to the loading and groundwater recharge above carbonate bedrock. Clearly it is impossible not to affect those conditions when constructing a landfill. It is reasonable to expect that the conditions remain undisturbed before landfill construction, and that the disturbance be minimized in and around the landfill area during and after construction. Finally, FWC supports the concept that the intrinsic suitability of a proposed site for landfilling should be a separate and discrete step in landfill siting. -A site should be judged to be suitable for landfilling, or not, on its geologic and hydrological characteristics, and not on the ability of engineering to render a facility permissible. This rule -making effort was premised on the need for site geology and hydrology to minimize the impact of a failure of engineering. Once a site has been judged to be suitable for landfilling we expect the industry to bring all of its engineering resources to bear making the facility as safe as possible. But a safe site depends not only on engineering, but on the intrinsic character of the site itself. We hope that the proposed rule will be adopted with no weakening of any of its key components —which we see as including the 50 foot rule, the 200 foot setback and the 100 day time of travel, We note that both the 50 foot rule and the 200 foot setback provisions of the proposed rule provide variance procedures which, if utilized, clearly would require less than 50 feet and less than 200 feet of separation from carbonate bedrock and existing karst features, respectively. If there is ever a special circumstance which would render the 50 foot and/or 200 foot separations moot for a particular project— and we seriously doubt that such a case can be made, but if it were —the opportunity to apply a lesser standard already exists. Therefore, the proposed standards which make up the heart of this rule should not be reduced —that is, weakened —directly. Thank you for your consideration of these comments. Minnesota Pollution Control As�m�� - - Municipal Division, Notice of Intent to Adopt Rules without a Public Hearing Proposed Amendment to Minnesota Ru/es�������1 and 7�5 (N�����l.311I Additional Siting Requirements for Certain a ndfills that|Have Not Received a Permit before January I,20I1/and Revised, Part 703*525Z5,Sd.lidWaste, Management Facilities Governed) Introduction. The K8innesqtaPoUution-Contro|,Aaency(Agenn) intends to adopt rules without a public hearing following the procedures |nthe rules ofthe Office ofAdministrative Headn `Minnesota' Rules, parts 14OU.23OOto14OO.231O and the Administrative Procedure Act, Minnesota Statutes, sections 14.22to14.28.`ygynlAy s.qhmLit,writtenco[uo]Ontsonthepooposed, rules a.nd.nzayo\so-submitnrequest that a hea ring -be -hold owthre' ruilesuntil*30 p.,,m'.,:oh Friclay,-�Iune_24, 2Q11, - Agency Contact Person. You: hust-subnl|tcomments nrquest��nsonthe rules and xvrh1en requests for a public th -Cooleyporson, The Agency contact person is: Nathan atthoY�innzsotaPoUu n Control Agency,- ye�eR a-'SaintPau[K3 . 55155,phone ' , 651-797'2290 fax6S1-297-R676,,and e`[naUnathan�oo|ev@ntatamn.us.TTYuuersmaycaUtheA8enoy Subject ofRulesmnd Statutory AuthoritV.The proposed rules provide additional limits onwhere certain newly-permittL-d,landfillsi,ma,y be-sited.7he Agency.has general authority to adoptandamend existing solid waste rules under'MinnesotnStatute §1l6.O7,subd.2and subd.4(b).Additionally, |nMay 20ODand May 2Ol[lthe Legislature amend ed-mYk/nesotoStatute §l16.U7,subds.4(d,4(d) and 4h,to providespec|f|oavth9dty{oprphib)ts|tipg-.certaintypesofso|idvvaste|andd/sposa|faci|itiosthathave .notrece>vedapermo\tbefnreJanumry1,2Q11,basedbnunarem'soenoidvitytogroundvvoter contanninat|nnmnd where karstio1)ke} deve|op.Thestatute specifies that sensitivity tpgroundwater contamination isbased onthe predicted. minimum tinnp of travel ofgroundwater contaminants fromthe solid waste tnthe cunmp}iance'boohda'.The statute requires that the rules specify testable orotherwise objective thresholds for these criteria, FivaUy,.M/nvem Statute §.116.07,yuhd.4(d) provides moratorium on permitting specified types qfna\mlandfills until the,,Agency promulgates rules that address the legislative- d\redive.-MinnonotuStatute §`14JiZS,�aUow�o6enc/estuamend existing rules and requires agencies topropose ru|euyvithin 1A-mnonthsnfreceiving specific legislative authorization (by Novemnbar17,2Ol').Acopyofthe proposed rules, inpublished inthe StateRegister and attached tothis notice asmailed. Comments. You have until 4:30.p.m'mnFriday, June 24, 2011, to submit written comment in, support oforiUopposition [nany element ofthe proposed rules, Your comment must beinwriting and the Agency contact per son must receive it by the close of the comment period, The Agency encourages comment on any aspect of the rules. Your comment should identify the portion of the proposed rules addressed andthe reason for the comment. You are'encduragedto propose any chahge clesired*, Request for aHearing. /naddition tosubmitting comments, you may also request that the� Agency hold a public hearing on the rules. Your request must beln writing and the Agency contact person must receive it by the close of the comment period. Your written request for a public hearing must include your name and address. You must identify the portion of the proposed rules that you object to or state that you oppose the entire set of rules. Any requestthat does not comply with these � ^ requirements is not valid and the Agency cannot count it when determining whether it must hold'a public hearing. You are also encouraged to state the reason for the request and any changes you want made tothe proposed rules. Withdrawal of Requests. If 25 or more persons submit a valid written request for a hearing, the Agency will hold a public hearing unless a sufficient number withdraw their requests in writing. If enough requests for hearing are withdrawn to reduce the number below 26, the Agency must give written notice of this to all persons who requested a hearing, explain the actions the Agency took to affect the withdrawal, and ask for written comments on this action. If a public hearing is required, the Agency will follow the procedures in Minnesota Statutes, §§ 14,131 to 14,20. Alternative Format. Upcn request, this information can bernadc available in an alternative . , format, such as large print, braille, or audio. To make such a request, please contact the Agency contact person atthe address ortelephone' number listed above. Modifications. The Agency may modify the proposed rules as a result of public'comment. The rnodificndunrnnustbesupportmdbyconorhentsandiuformationsubmittedtotheAgencKandthe adopted rules may not be substantially different than these proposed rules, unless the Agency follows the procedure under Minnesota Rules, part 1400.2110. If the proposed rules affect you in any Way, the Agency encourages you toparticipateinthe ru|emnek|nQprocess. Statement ofNeed and Reasonableness. The Statement ofNeed and Reasonableness attempts to provide rationale for the proposed rules, It describes who will likely be affected and estimates the probable costs of the proposed rules. It is now available from the Agency contact person. You may review it or obtain copies -for the cost of reproduction by contacting the Agency contact person. Lobbyist Registration. Minnesota Statutes, chapter 10A,requires each lobbyist toregister with the State Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board. You should direct questions about this requirement tothe Campaign Finance and Public Disclosure Board at: Suite 19O,Centennial Building, GS8 Cedar Street, St. Paul, Minnesota551SS,telephone GS1,I96-S148prOOO-6S7-3gD9. _ Admmtonanrd Review 'mfRules. �nohearing isrequired, the Agency rnayadopt the rules after the end mfthe conmmentper|od.The Agency will then submit the rules and supporting documents tothe office of Administrative Hearings for review for legality. You may ask to be notified of the date the -- Agency suhnn}ts1hacu|ms.tp_,ftt}ff/oe'|fyou want tpbesonotified, or want to, receiveacopy ofthe adopted rules, nrwant toregister with the Agency toreceive notice nffuture rule proceedings, submit ----''--- your request tothe Agency contact person listed above. 04/19/11 REVISOR CKM/JK RD4008 1.1 Pollution Control Agency 1.2 Proposed Permanent Rules Relating to Landfill Siting 1.3 7001.3111 ADDITIONAL SITING REQUIREMENTS FOR CERTAIN 1 4 LANDFILLS THAT HAVE NOT RECEIVED A PERMIT BEFORE JANUARY 1, 1 5 2011. 1.6 Subpart 1. Applicability. In addition to the requirements of this chapter and chapter 1.7 7035, after January 1, 2011, an applicant for a solid waste land disposal facility permit 1.8 that is not a contiguous expansion of a permitted facility or a noncontiguous expansionwithin600 yards of -a -permitted facility must demonstrate-1(YMb. commissioner that the 1.10 facility meets the additional requirements Of this part, unless that facility will accept onlv 1.11 demolition and construction debris and incidental packaging or that facility will accept 1.12 only industrial waste that is limited to wood, concrete, porcelain fixtures, shingles, or 1.13 window glass resulting from the manufacture of building materials. 1.14 Subp. 2. Site evaluation. The applicant must comply with parts 7001.3175, 1.15 7001.3200, and 7001.3275. 1.16 Subp. .3. Siting standards. The applicant must demonstrate to the commissioner 1.17 using testable or otherwise objective data that the proposed landfill site meets the criteria in 1.18 item A or B and the criteria in items C and D. The applicant must provide a certification for 1.19 site and groundwater conditions from a professional geologist licensed in Minnesota and a 1.20 certification for structural conditions from a professional engineer,licen.sed in Minnesota, 1.21 A. The predicted minimum time of travel of groundwater contaminants from 1.22 the proposed landfill's base grade to an approvable proposed compliance boundary is at 1.23 least 100 days. 1.24 B. Groundwater flow is known in sufficient detail to allow monitoring for 1.25 potential contaminant releases, and site and groundwater conditions would allow the 1.26 owner/operator sufficient space and time to implement corrective actions to prevent 7001.3111 1 Approved by Revisor Ck--40 04/19/11 REVISOR 60. - • CKM/JK RD4008 2.1 contaminants released from the landfill from exceeding applicable standards at a 2.2 compliance boundary. 2.3 C. No karst exists within 200 feet laterally of the proposed waste fill area. 2.4 D. At sites where carbonate bedrock exists, either of the following conditions 2.5 are met within the area of the compliance boundary: 2.6 (1) more than 50 feet of undisturbed, unconsolidated overburden has been 2.7 maintained prior to construction of the landfill so that karst is not likely to develop; or 2.8 (2) based on the site evaluation in subpart 2, employing field technioues 2.9 approved by the commissioner, the commissioner finds that karst is not likely to develop, 2.10 and the site will support the.-oroposed landfill structure. 2.11 7035.2525 SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT FACILITIES GOVERNED. 2.12 Tor text of subp 1, see M.R.1 2,13 Subp. 2. Exceptions. Parts 7035.2525 to 7035.2915 do not'apply to the following 2.14 solid waste management facilities or persons, except as indicated: 2.15 [Fortext ofitems A to E, see M.R.1 2.16 F. industrial solid waste land disposal facilities., except that those receiving an. -2,17-- --initial-permit after -January 1, 2011,-must comply with part 7035.2555; . 2. i8 [For text of items G to K, see M.R.1 7035.2525 2 CM OF LAKE ELMO AYOR & COUNCIL C AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MWI UNICA TI ON DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION 6/21/2011 4 as part of the Consent Agenda Resolution No. 2011-022 Resolution Affirming Participation in the Office of the State Auditor's Voluntary 201. I Performance Measurement Program Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director Bruce A. Messelt, City AdministratoiR Ise Joe Rigdon, KDV, Finance Consultant SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider Resolution No. 2011-022, affirming the City's participation in the Office of the State Auditor' Voluntary 2011 Performance Measurement Program. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFIORMATION & STAFF REPORT: The 2010 State Legislature enacted legislation calling for the Council on Results and Innovation to establish a standard set of performance measures for cities that will "aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of . • . cities in providing services . . ," The Council has established these performance measurements (attached) and is soliciting, through the Office of the State Auditor, voluntary participation in the 2011 effort (also attached). In addition to the results generated from participation, benefits to participating cities include remuneration of $0,14 per capita and exemption from levy limits for the participating year. The program is anticipated to run (and be funded) on a voluntary basis for 2011 and 2012. City staff has discussed this program with the State Program Manager and determined that sufficient flexibility exists within the program to allow for Lake Elmo to participate on both a cost effective and activity -specific basis, It is anticipated that the approximately $1,200 in revenue from the State will fully cover the City's expense in formulating and executing the required survey and the gathering and publishing of the collected data and results. -- page 1 — City Council Meeting Participation in 2011 Performa Measurement Program June 21st, 2011 Consent Agenda Item # 4 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above Background Information and Staff Report, it is respectfully recommended that the City Council consider Resolution No. 2011-022, affirming the City's participation in the Office of the State Auditor' Voluntary 2011 Performance Measurement Program, No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action, While tabling this item is not recommended — the deadline for determining participation is July 1st, 2011 - the Council may elect to amend the recommended motion. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be; Move to approve Resolution No. 2011-022, affirming the City's participation in the Office of the State Auditor' -Voluntary 2011 PerformanceMeasurement. Program [as amended/modified at tonight's meeting]." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No, 2011-022 2. Letter from the Office of the State Auditor regarding the 2011 Performance Measurement Program 3 The Council on Local Results and Innovation 2011 Legislative Report SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Aeenda): Questions from Council to Staff „.„ ........ ...„. ........ . ........ ...„,.„ Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ...... ....... .„,„...„...,.„... .............. Mayor & City Council Discussion „.......,.............„„ ......... ......... Mayor Facilitates Action on Motion.... ...... .............. ........,., ........ Mayor & City Council -- page 2 — CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2011-022 A RESOLUTION AFFIRMING THE CITY 'S PARTICIPATION IN THE OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITORVOLUNTARY 2011 PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT PROGRAM WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, The 2010 State Legislature enacted legislation calling for the Council on Results and Innovation to establish a standard set of performance measures for cities; and WHEREAS, such performance measures will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of cities in providing services; and WHEREAS, the Council has established these performance measurements and is soliciting, through the Office of the State Auditor, voluntary participation in the 2011 effort; and WHEREAS, in addition to the results generated from participation, benefits to participating cities include remuneration of $0.14 per capita and exemption from levy limits for the participating year; and WHEREAS, sufficient flexibility exists within the program to allow for Lake Elmo to participate on both a cost effective and activity -specific basis. NOW, THEREFORE, be it resolved by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, that the City does hereby affirm its intention to participate in the Office of the State Auditor's Voluntary 2011 Performance Measurement Program. Passed and duly adopted this 21st day of June, 2011 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, Dean A. Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator ... uaxfuot REBECCA OTTO STATE AUDITOR June 1, 2011 STATE OF MINNES6.A OFFICE OF THE STATE AUDITOR SIAM 500 . 525 PARK STREET SAINT PAUL, MN 551034139 (651) 296-2551 (Voice) (651) 296-4755 (Fax) state.auditor@state,mo.us (E-mail) I-800-627-3529 (Relay Service) Dear City Cleric/Finance Officer/County Auditor: In 2010, the Legislature created the Council on Local Results and Innovation. In February 2011, the Council released a standard set of ten performance measures for counties and ten performance measures for cities that will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of counties and cities in providing services, and measure residents' opinions of those services. By February of 2012, the Council must create comprehensive performance measurement systems for cities and counties to implement in 2012. Cities and counties that choose to participate in the new standards measure program may be eligible for a reimbursement in LGA, and exemption from levy limits. Participation in the standard measures program by a city or a county is voluntary. Counties and cities that choose to participate in the standard measures program must officially adopt the corresponding 10 performance benchmarks developed by the Council, and implement them in 2011. They will be required to communicate the results of the measures to their residents the following calendar year. A county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program for 2011 is eligible for a reimbursement of $0.14 per capita in local government aid, not to exceed $25,000 and is also exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in 2012, if levy limits are in effect. In order to receive the per capita reimbursement in 2011, and levy limit exemption for calendar year 2012, counties and cities must: V File a report with the Office of the State Auditor by July 1, 2011. This report will consist of a declaration approved by the city council or county board stating that the city/county has adopted the corresponding 10 performance measures developed by the Council. Annual reporting will be required by the cities and counties that participate in the program. By July 1, 2012, cities and counties will be required to report to the OSA that they have adopted both the performance benchmarks, and the performance measure system released by the Council in February of 2012. A declaration will be required that the city/county has reported or will report the results for calendar 2011 of the 10 adopted measures to its residents before the end of calendar year 2012. To meet the reporting requirements for 2011, a copy of the declaration in a PDF format can be attached to an email and sent to gid@osa.state.mn.us. Beginning next year, the Office of the State Auditor will be using the State Auditor's Form Entry System (SAFES) for the local performance measurement and improvement program reporting. An Equal Opportunity Employer 6.91 LOCAL PERFORMANCE 1(-4 ,ASUREMENT AND REPORTING Subdivision 1.Reports of local performance measures. (a) A county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program must report its results to its citizens annually through publication, direct mailing, posting on the jurisdiction's Web site, or through a public hearing at which the budget and levy will be discussed and public input allowed. (b) Each year, jurisdictions participating in the local performance measurement and improvement program must file a report with the state auditor by July 1, in a form prescribed by the auditor. All reports must include a declaration that the jurisdiction has complied with, or will have complied with by the end of the year, the requirement in paragraph (a). For jurisdictions participating in the standard measures program, the report shall consist of the jurisdiction's results for the standard set of performance measures under section 6.90. subdivision 2. paragraph (a). In 2012, jurisdictions participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program must submit a resolution approved by its local governing body indicating that it either has implemented or is in the process of implementing a local performance measurement system that meets the minimum standards specified by the council under section 6.90, subdivision 2. paragraph (b). In 2013 and thereafter, jurisdictions participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program must submit a statement approved by its local governing body affirming that it has implemented a local performance measurement system that meets the minimum standards specified by the council under section 6.90, subdivision 2. paragraph (b). Subd. 2.Benefits of participation. (a) A county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program for 2011 is: (1) eligible for per capita reimbursement of $0.14 per capita, but not to exceed $25,000 for any government entity; and (2) exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in 2012, if levy limits are in effect. (b) Any county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program for 2012 is eligible for per capita reimbursement of $0.14 per capita, but not to exceed $25,000 for any government entity. Any jurisdiction participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program is exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in 2013 if levy limits are in effect. (c) Any county or city that elects to participate in the standard measures program for 2013 or any year thereafter is eligible for per capita reimbursement of $0.14 per capita, but not to exceed $25,000 for any government entity. Any jurisdiction participating in the comprehensive performance measurement program for 2013 or any year thereafter is exempt from levy limits under sections 275.70 to 275.74 for taxes payable in the following year, if levy limits are in effect. Subd. 3.Certification of participation. (a) The state auditor shall certify to the commissioner of revenue by August 1 of each year the counties and cities that are participating in the standard measures program and the comprehensive performance measurement program. (b) The commissioner of revenue shall make per capita aid payments under this section on the second payment date specified in section 477A.015. in the same year that the measurements were reported. (c) The commissioner of revenue shall notify each county and city that is entitled to exemption from levy limits by August 10 of each levy year. An Equal Opportunity Employer The Council on Local Results and Innovation 2011 Legislative Report February 14, 2011 February 14, 2011 To the Property and Local Sales Tax Division of the House of Representatives, Taxes Committee and the Taxes Division on Property Taxes of the Senate Tax Committee, Per the requirements of 2010 Minnesota Laws Chapter 389, Article 2, Sections 1 and 2, the Council on Local Results and Innovation is submitting its recommended "... standard set of approximately ten performance measures for counties and ten performance measures for cities that will aid residents, taxpayers, and state and local elected officials in determining the efficacy of counties and cities in providing services, and measure residents' opinion of those services." The recommended model performance measures are attached. Local government and public feedback was solicited on the proposed benchmarks. The members of the Council include: • Patricia Coldwell, Association of Minnesota Counties • John Gunyou, City of Minnetonka • Mark Hintermeyer, City of Moorhead • Jay Kiedrowski, Humphrey School, University of Minnesota • Katie Nerem, Blue Earth County • Rebecca Otto, Minnesota State Auditor • Jay Stroebel, City of Minneapolis • Matt Stemwedel, City of Woodbury • Wendy Underwood, City of St. Paul • Tim Walsh, Scott County • Ben Woessner, City of Pelican Rapids The Council received no funding to conduct their work. Meeting minutes were taken by volunteers, and the Office of the State Auditor posted all meeting materials and meeting dates on the Office of the State Auditor website. All meetings were open to the public. The Council sees value in having all counties and cities in Minnesota develop performance measures that they use to manage their jurisdictions and having results of those performance measures shared with citizens and property tax payers. Our recommended performance measures should be considered examples to assist counties and cities in developing their own performance measures. The Council was concerned about the misuse of these performance measures by the legislature or others in the appropriation of funds or for comparisons among counties and cities. The general performance measures recommended are simply inadequate for those purposes. The Council on Local Results and Innovation is proceeding to meet the additional requirements of the statute, which is to "develop recommended minimum standards for comprehensive performance measurement systems by February 15, 2012." We interpret "performance measurement system" to mean more broadly a performance management system that uses pert:), mance measures to manage counties and cities. Representatives of the Council would welcome the opportunity to discuss the Council's work, our recommended model performance measures, and our concerns about the use of these measures. Sincerely, Jay Kiedrowski, Chair Minnesota Council on Local Results and Innovation Cc: House Speaker, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority Leader, and Senate Minority Leader Attached: Model Performance Measures for Counties, Model Performance Measures for Cities Model Performance Measures for Counties The following axe the recommended model measures of performance outcomes for counties, with alternatives provided in some cases. Key output measures are also suggested for consideration by local county officials. Public Safety: Part I and II crime rates (Submit data as reported by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Part I crimes include murder, rape, aggravated assault, burglay, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Part II crimes include other assaults, forgery/counterfeiting, embezzlement, stolen property, vandalism, weapons, prostitution, other sex offenses, narcotics, gambling, family/children crime, D,U.I., liquor laws, disorderly conduct, and other offenses.) OR Citizen's rating of safety in their county. (Citizen Survey: very safe, somewhat safe, neither safe nor unsafe, somewhat safe, very unsafe) Output Measure: Deputy Response Time (Time it takes on top -priority calls from dispatch to the first officer on scene.) Probation/Corrections: 2. Percent of adult offenders with a new felony conviction within 3 years of discharge Public Works: 3 Hours to plow complete system during a snow event 4. Average county pavement condition rating OR Citizen's rating of the road conditions in their county. (Citizen Survey: good condition, mostly good condition, many bad spots) (Under legislation passed in 2009 (Minn. Stat. § 402A.15), counties are engaged with the Department of Human Services and community organizations in a three-year process to develop comprehensive performance measures across all areas of human services, for which all counties will be held accountable. The following measures here are intended to serve as 'place - holders', not to replace the more comprehensive measures scheduled to be completed by December 2012.) Public Health: 5. Life Expectancy generally and by sex and race OR Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance system rating (Citizen Survey: excellent, very good, good, fair, or poor) Social Services: 6. Workforce participation rate among MFIP and DWP recipients 7. Percentage of children where there is a recurrence of maltreatment within 12 months following an intervention Taxation: 8. Level of assessment ratio (if the median ratio falls between 90% and 105%, the level of assessment is determined to be acceptable.) Elections: 9. Accuracy of post -election audit (Percentage of ballots counted accurately.) Veterans' Services: Output Measure: Parks: Percent of veterans surveyed who said their questions were answered when seeking benefit information from their County Veterans' Office 10. Citizens' rating of the quality of county parks, recreational programs, and/or facilities. (Citizen survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Library: 11. Number of annual visits per 1,000 residents 4 Model Performance Measures for Cities, The following are the recommended model measures of performance outcomes for cities, with alternatives provided in some cases. Key output measures are also suggested for consideration by local city officials. General: 1. Rating of the overall quality of services provided by your city (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 2. Percent change in the taxable property market value 3 Citizens' rating of the overall appearance of the city (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Police Services: 4. Part I and II crime rates (Submit data as reported by the Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension. Part I crimes include murder, rape, aggravated assault, burglary, larceny, motor vehicle theft, and arson. Part II crimes include other assaults, ,forgery/counterfeiting, embezzlement, stolen property, vandalism, weapons, prostitution, other sex offenses, narcotics, gambling, family/children crime, D. U.I., liquor laws, disorderly conduct, and other offenses) OR Citizens' rating of safety in their community (Citizen Survey: very safe, somewhat safe, neither safe nor unsafe, somewhat unsafe, very unsafe) Output Measure: Police response time (Time it takes on top priority calls from dispatch to the first officer on scene.) Fire Services: 5. Insurance industry rating of fire services (The Insurance Service Office (ISO) issues ratings to Fire Departments throughout the country for The effectiveness of their fire protection services and equipment to protect their community. The ISO rating is a numerical grading system and is one of the primary elements used by the insurance industry to develop premium rates for residential and commercial businesses. ISO analyzes data using a Fire Suppression Rating Schedule (FSRS) and then assigns a .Public Protection Classification ,from 1 to 10. Class 1 generally represents superior property fire protection and Class 10 indicates that the area's fire suppression prograrn does not meet ISO's minimum criteria.) OR Streets: Citizens' rating of the quality of fire protection services (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Output Measure: Fire response time (Time it takes from dispatch to apparatus On scene ,for calls hat are dispatched as a possible fire). Emergency Medical Services (EMS) response time (if applicable) (Time it takes from dispatch to arrival of EMS) 6. Average city street pavement condition rating (Provide average rating and the rating system program/type. Example: 70 rating on the Pavement Condition Index (PCI)) Water: OR Citizens' rating of the road condition in their city (Citizen Survey: good condition, mostly good condition, many bad spots) 7. Citizens' rating the quality of snowplowing on city streets (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) 8, Citizens' rating of the dependability and quality of city water supply (centrally - provided system) (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Output Measure: Operating cost per 1,000,000 gallons of water pumped/produced (centrally -provided system) (Actual operating expense for water utilily / (total gallons pumped/1,000,000)) Sanitary Sewer: 9, Citizens' rating of the dependability and quality of city sanitary sewer service (centrally provided system) (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor) Output Measure: Number of sewer blockages on city system per 100 connections (centrally provided system) (Number of sewer blockages on city system reported by sewer utility / (population/100)) Parks and Recreation: 10. Citizens' rating of the quality of city recreational programs and facilities (parks, trails, park buildings) (Citizen Survey: excellent, good, fair, poor 5' CITY OF LAKE ELMO AYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: DATE: 6/21/2011 CONSENT ITEM 4: 5 MOTION Ordinance No. 08-045 Consider Amended 2011 Fee Schedule Torn Bouthilet, Finance Director Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief Bruce Messelt, City Administrator Sharon Lurnby, City Clerk SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Council is respectfully requested to consider adopting Ordinance No. 08-045, approving an Amended 2011 Fee schedule to include City support fees for private special events. The suggested motion to do so is: SUGGESTED "Move to adopt Ordinance No. 08-045 approving the Amended MOTION: 2011 Fee Schedule, as presented herein." BACKGROUND INFORMATION & STAFF REPORT: The City has received a request to provide on -site Public Safety personnel for an upcoming private special event, to be held on June 24th (Go Commando). This event is anticipated to generate crowds and participants in excess of 4000 persons. City staff has been in contact with the event's sponsors with respect to issues of traffic generation, public safety, medical services, and events activities. Traffic control will be provided by the event organizers, via shuttle services to nearby parking lots. Public security is being contracted for via Washington County and private/off duty security providers. Medical services and event activities are being provided for by event organizers. On site deployment of a Lake Elmo Fire Department Engine is being requested by event organizers. The City currently has no specific special event policies, requirements or regulations. Additionally, even though this is an unsolicited and optional request by the event organizers, the City has no policy or mechanism to determine and collect an appropriate fee for such services (save for perhaps acceptance of a post hoc voluntary contribution). -- page 1 -- City Council Meeting Consider An June 21st, 2011 ,ed 2011 Fee Schedule Consent Agenda Rem # 5 The City Council annually adopts an Ordinance approving the fee schedule. The fee schedule represents charges for services and is determined by the City's time and expenditures for providing designated services. Based upon the fee schedule adopted by the Washington County Chief s Association and the Capital City Regional Firefighter's Association for Reciprocal Fire Services and Mutual Aid, the following rates are suggested for private special events requesting specific support (with the addition of an hourly Public Worksrate, as well): Special Events Support Fire Department Equipment/ Personnel Public Safety Public Works Support (Traffic Control/Other) $250/HR (Engine) $350/11R (Ladder) - NA $100/HR Materials As Per Washington County Sheriff's Dept,Fee Schedule RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council consider adopting Ordinance No. 08-xxx approving an Amended 2011 fee schedule to include City support fees for private special events. The suggested motion to do so is as follows: "Move to adopt Ordinance No. 08-045 approving the Amended 2011 Fee Schedule, as presented herein," Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to table this item, to further discuss, deliberate and/or amend this proposed schedule, prior to taking action. If changes are made by the Council, the appropriate action following such changes would be: "Move to adopt Ordinance No. 08-045 approving the Amended 2011 Fee Schedule, as presented [and modified, herein." ATTACHMENTS: 1, Ordinance No. 08-045 2, Proposed Amended 2011 Fee Schedule 3, Washington County Chiefs Association and the Capital City Regional Firefighter's Association Fee Schedules for Reciprocal Fire Services and Mutual Aid SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Agenda): Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ..... ,,,,, ......... „, ........ ...... Mayor & City Council Discussion ___„.......... ....... ............... ..... ,..„.,.„,.........._ Mayor Facilitates Action on Motion__ .......... ,........... .......... ..... ............._ Mayor & City Council -- page 2 -- CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO, 08-045 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING MUNICIPAL FEES FOR CALENDAR YEAR 2011 The Lake Elmo City Council hereby adopts the following fee schedule for calendar year 2011, applicable as services outlined in Appendix A, and directs that it be added to the Lake Elmo Municipal Code as Appendix A. Appendix A —2011 Fee Schedule ADOPTION DATE: Passed by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 21st day of June, 2011. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: ATTEST Sharon Lumby City Clerk Dean A. Johnston Its: Mayor PUBLICATION DATE: Published on the day of , 2010, Appendix A City of Lake Eltno 2011 Fee Schedule 2011 Accessory Bldg Forward of Primary Structure $80,00 Administrative / Fines $0.00 Amateur Radio Antenna $875.00 Appeal (to Board of Adjustment and Appeals) $150.00 Assessment Search $25,00 Building Demolition First 1000 Square Feet $10.5.00 Each Additional 1000 so feet or portion thereof $11.00 Burning Permits Residential $45,00 Commercial $80.00 Illegal Burn 1 $100.00 Comprehensive Plan Amendment J $1,300.00 Conditional Use Permit (CUP) j New $1,050,00 <new or amended> Amended $500.00 CONTRACTOR LICENSE FEES Blacktopping $75.04 Excavator License $75.00 Heating and A/C $75.00 Sign Installer $50.00 Solid Waste Hauler $120.00 Tree Contract $70,00 COPY SERVICES Copies (B&W) $0.35 Copies (B&() 11 X 17 $1,00 Copies (Color) $0.50 Copies (Color) 11 X 17 $2.00 City Map - colored $3,15 City Street Maps 36 X 40 $20.00 GIS / Engineering Maps Existing Maps $5,00 Custom (Per Hour rate) j $70,00 Plan Size Maps Larger than 11 X 17 1 $20,00 Development Standards Specification & Details $55.00 Code Book $160.00 Sections 1, 2, 4, 6-12,14 $12.00 Section 3 $52.00 Section 5 and 13 $27.00 Comprehensive Plan $125,00 OP Ordinance $12,00 Parks Plan 1 $80.00 Culverts in Developments with Rural Section 1$160,00 Dog License $20.00 Service Dogs License (dogs with special training to assist $5,00 individual with disabilities) Unlicensed dog (first impound) $60.00 Licensed dog (first impound) $42.00 Cat Impound (first impound) $42.00 Subsequent dog/cat impound $85.00 Duplicate License or Tag $1.00 Driveway Residential $70.00 Commercial $160.00 Easement Encroachment $100.00 Electronic Fund Withdrawal / Bill Payment Excavating and Grading False Alarm 1 to 3 False alarms In excess of 3 up to and including 6 false alarms within alarms within a twelve (12) month period Residential Commercial 1 re & 'Fransaction Charge $125,00 acre, Escrow or Additional Charge Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Wireless Communication Facilities Escrow $6,000.00 Flood Plain Ordinance Escrow $500.00 Sign Reinspection Pee $25.00 IProyided electronically or paper 1Provided electronically or paper Renew on expiration of rabies vaccination Plus Boarding Pee-20.00/Day Plus Boarding Fec-20.00/Day Plus Boarding Pee-20.00/Day Plus Boarding Fee-20.00/Day Phis 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Staff & Recording Fee $110.00 $315,00 Erosion Control Bond, Escrow, or Letter of Credit: $1500.00 per Page 1 of 4 Appendix A Cityi_ake Elmo 2011 Fee Schedule In excess of six false alarms within a twelve (12) month period Residential Con-unercial Fire Daycare inspection Fcc Fric Alarm Systems Fire Sprinkler System (inspection Fee) Fire Sprinkler System otcimpcnion t'co Flood Plain District Delineation Fuel Tank Removal (Underground) Fuel Tank Install Heating New Residential Addition to Residential Commercial (New or Addition) Interim Use Permit (IUP) Interim Use Pernik (IUP)-Renewal Interim Use Permit (IUP) AG Sales & Entertainment Lawn Sprinklers Liquor Club On Sale intoxicating Off Sale Intoxicating Off -Sale Non -Intoxicating On -Sale Intoxicating On -Sale Intoxicating - 2nd Bldg On -Sale Investigation On -Sale Non -Intoxicating On -Sale Sunday Intoxicating Temporary Non -Intoxicating Wine Lot Line Adjustment Manufactured Home Parks New Move home out of City Move into City Minor Subdivision Moving House or Primary Structure into City Moving Accessory Structure into City New Construction Plan Review Park Dedication (up to 3 lots) Parking Lots New Commercial Existing Commercial Platting Concept (PUD or OP) Preliminary Plat (and Development Stage) Final Plat (and Final Plan) Plumbing New Residential Addition to Residential Commercial (New or Addition) Private Roads (permitted only in AG zone) Restrictive Soils and Wetland Restoration Protection and Preservation Permit 175 $150.00 $800.00 2011 $185.00 $520.00 $60,00 $60,00 2/0 of value of work $50.00 $500.00 $100,00 2% of value of work $150.00 $75,00 Minimum $175.00 or 1% of total job cost $1,050,00 $300.00 $250.00 $125.00 $100.00 per year $200,00 per year $150.00 per year $1500.00 per year $750.00 per year $350,00 $100.00 per year $200.00 per year $25.00 per event $300,00 per year $310.00 $1,000.00 $1,200,00 $100.00 $150.00 $500,00 $520.00 $305.00 Per 1997 UDC (65% of $3600,00 for each newly $175,00 Escrow or Additional Charge Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 1% of Value Minimum $100.00 Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Minimum $100,00 Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus minimum 5.00 Surcharge 2011 Only Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 2500.00 Escrow Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus bond with amount to be determined by City wirecommendation from Building Official Plan Remove to be determined by the City w/reeommendation from Building Official Four or more lots per Section 400 Formula Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) $100.00 Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) $1,250.00 $1,850.00 $1,250.00 Plus 2.5% Administrative Fee Development Agreement $150,00 Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) $75,00 Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus minimum 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) 1500.00 escrow Page 2 of 4 Appendix A City of ake Bimo 2011 Fee Schedule Right -of -Way Permits Annual Registration (1415.05 Subd.1) Excavation (1415.11 Subd. 1) Each Additional Excavation Trench Fee (boring or open cut) Overhead Installation Ice New Subdivisions (Alternate to per foot fee) Street Obstruction Fee (1415.11 (Sub 2.) Permit Extension Delay Penalty Sewage Disposal On -Site Septic Systems New Alterations or Repairs Sewer Availability Charge (SAC) Sewer Wetland Treatment Elookup to Existing System Alteration/Repair 201 Off -Site Maintenance Fee Signs Permanent Signs Temporary Signs 'Temporary Renewal Site Plan Review (Chapter 520) 4itafTitietttssSttppMC! 7,1 Ka44,4,i,6•Sit r MO 4- ContrpliOthel) 'Street Cleaning Erosion Control Escrow Re -inspection Processing Fee Surface Water Residential Non -Residential (con u-nercial, ag,, etc.) Tennis Courts Vacations (Streets or Easements) Easements Streets Variance Video Reproduction Water Residential - Quarterly Rate .Plus Rate Per 1000 Gallons -.0-15,000 Gallons .15,001 - 30,000 Gallons .30,001 - 50,000 Gallons 50,001 - 80,000 Gallons 80,001+Gallons Commercial - Quarterly Rate 0-15,000 Gallons 15,001 - 30,000 Gallons 30,001 - 50,000 Gallons 50,001 - 80,000 Gallons 80,001+Gallons All Connection Permits Meters, MID & Meter Installation Scts Delinquent Accounts Disconnect Service Reconnect Service Escrow or Additional Charge 2011 $100.00 $230.00 $40.00 .60 per foot .60 perfoot $100,00 $100,00 $100.00 25,00 per day $5,730.00 84.50 per 1,000 gallons $100.00 $75.00 75.00 per unit per quarter $180.00 $75.00 $25.00 $980.00 =*250/1110 ng *100.00 $5,000.00 $50.00 per hour $50,00 $50.00 Per 1997 UBC $515.00 $515.00 $750.00 $35.00 $25.00 Base $2.14 $2.86 $3.77 $5.00 $6.63 $25.00 Base $3.11 $3.26 $3.77 $5.00 $6.63 $140.00 $300,00 6% per quarter $80.00 $80.00 Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) per SAC unit -2230.00 to Mel Council; 3500 to City Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5.00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Plus 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) Portal to Portal from City Hall. Minimum; 1 hour 10% of Contractor's Invoice to City Utility Rate Factor per code Phis 5,00 Surcharge (State Mandated) $500,00 Escrow $500.00 Escrow Phis 25,00 or 0%, whichever is greater, if certified to County for collection with IVIC5 Page 3 of 4 Appendix A Ci Service Call Water Storage Violation Bulk Water from Hydrant Swimming Pool Fill Water Availability Charge (WAC) Existing Structures within Old Village New Development Wind Generator Wireless Communication Permit Zoning Amendment (Text or Map) ake Elmo 2011 Fee Schedule 2011 Escrow or Additional Charge $15.00 per day $61.20 for first 5,000 gallons Plus 3.26 per additional 1000 Gals $61.20 for first 5,000 gallons Plus 3.26 per 1000 Gals & $15.00 per labor hour $800,00 $3,900.00 $850,00 $500,00 $1,245.00 $2000.00 Escrow $2000,00 Escrow Page 4 of 4 CITY OF LAKE EL AYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 6/21/11 CONSENT ITEM #: 1-6 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Planned Unit Development Amendment: Bremer Bank Parking Lot Expansion SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director THROUGH: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator\' REVIEWED BY: Kelli Matzek, City Planner SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is respectfully being asked to consider a request from Bremer Financial Services to amend the Planned Unit Development for Eagle Point Business Park to revise its site plan to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard. The parking lot currently is comprised of 405 parldng stalls and the proposed amendment would expand this number to 560 stalls (an increase of 155). The expansion has been requested due to the increase in employment within the facility that has been experienced since its construction in 2002, The proposed PUD Amendment is necessary in order to reduce the parking setback along the northern property boundary of the business park from 80 feet down to 20 feet and to remove a landscaped berm that was planted under a powerline easement on the northern portion of the site. The recommended motion to act on this is as follows: "Move adopt Resolution Number 2011-023 approving a Planned Unit Development amendment for Bremer Financial Services at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard to allow the expansion of the parking lot on this site" BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The attached Staff report includes a detailed review of the application along with a Staff and Planning Commission recommendation. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission reviewed the Planned Unit Development amendment request at its May 23'1 and June 13th meetings and conducted a public hearing on these dates. No public comments concerning the request were received by the Planning Commission. The Commission reviewed the findings drafted by Staff and found page 1 -- City Council Meeting Bremer Fin Services PUD Amendment 6-21-11 Consent Agenda Item # 1-6 that the proposed amendment was consistent with the general development plans for the business park. The Planning Commission did express concern regarding buffering and screening that would be left on the northern portion of the site, and recommended that a condition of approval be included that addresses this issue. The Planning Commission wanted to see additional evergreen trees used to provide a year-round screen to the future residential area to the north. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the PUD amendment request with four conditions of approval. PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information, staff report and Planning Commission recommendation, it is recommended that the City Council approve the PUD amendment request from Bremer Financial Services to amend the Planned Unit Development for, Eagle Point Business Park to revise its site plan to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard by undertaking the following action: "Move adopt Resolution Number 2011-023 approving a Planned Unit Development amendment for Bremer Financial Services at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard to allow the expansion of the parking lot on this site with the four conditions of approval as recommended by the Planning Commission" Alternatively, the City Council may table taking action on the application and direct either staff or the applicant to provide additional information concerning the request. The Council may also consider denying the Planned Unit Development amendment and should develop findings of fact to support a motion for denial based on the evidence presented during the course of the City review. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No 2011-023 2. Staff Report 3. Application Form 4. Letter from Bremer Financial Services 5. Review Letter from TKDA — UPDATED 6. Review Letter from SWWD 7, Response Letter from Applicant's Engineer 8. Storm Water Runoff Summary 9, Proposed Site Plans — UPDATED -- page 2 -- � | � | City Council Meeting 6-27-// ( BremeFFinancial Services 00Amendment Consent Agenda Item 9 1-6 10, Eagle Point Planned Unit Development Preliminary Plans SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction ufItem ......................................................... ,^e/v^w^^°=^"°""^ ........................................................... Questions from Council to Staff ........ ... ........................ Public Input, if Appropriate............................................. Callfor Motion ............................. ................................. Discussion........................................................ ^—''—^^' CITY OF LAKE ELMO RESOLUTION NO. 2011-023 A RESOLUTION APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT FOR THE EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK TO ALLOW BREMER FINANCIAL SERVICES TO EXPAND ITS PARKING LOT WHEREAS, Larson Engineering, Inc on behalf of Bremer Financial Services, 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard ("Applicant") has submitted an application to the City of Lake Elmo ("City") to amend the Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Eagle Point Business Park, a copy of which is on file in the Lake Elmo Planning Department; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD Amendment is to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard and to allow said parking lot to extend across an existing landscape berm and to be setback 20 feet from the northern property line on the site; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on May 23, 2011 and continued this hearing until its June 13, 2011 meeting to consider the PUD Amendment; and WHEREAS, on June 13, 2011 the Lake Elmo Planning Commission adopted a motion to recommend that the City Council approve the PUD Amendment with conditions; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission submitted its report and recommendation to the City Council as part of a memorandum from the Planning Department dated June 21, 2010; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the recommendation of the Planning Commission and the PUD Amendment at its June 21, 2011 meeting. NOW, THEREFORE, based upon the testimony elicited and information received, the City Council makes the following: FINDINGS 1) That the procedure for obtaining approval of said PUD Amendment is found in the Lake Elmo City Code, Section 150.074. 2) That all the requirements of said City Code Section 154.074 related to the PUD Amendment have been met by the Applicant. 3) That the proposed PUD Amendment would allow and expansion of the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard. The parking lot currently is comprised of 405 parking stalls and the proposed amendment would expand this number to 560 stalls (an increase of 155). The expansion has been requested due to the increase in employment within the facility that has been experienced since its construction in 2002. The proposed PUD Amendment would reduce the parking setback along the northern property boundary of the business park from 80 feet down to 20 feet and would permit the removal of a landscaped berm that was planted under a power line easement on the northern portion of the site. 4) That the legal description of the property to which the PUD Amendment will apply is as follows: Lot 1, Block 1 of the Eagle Point Business Park 3rd Addition, according to the plat thereof filed of record in the office of the Register or Titles in and for Washington County, Minnesota (per Certificate of Title 58177), AND Outlot E, Eagle Point Business Park rd Addition, according to the plat thereof filed of record in the office of the Register or Titles in and for Washington County, Minnesota (per Certificate of Title 59457). 5) That the proposed PUD Amendment: a) Is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. b) Is consistent with the purpose of Section 154.058 et seq. of the City Code. c) Complies with the development standards of Section 154.058 et seq. of the City Code. 6) That the proposed PUD Amendment will allow a more flexible, creative, and efficient approach to the use of the land than if the applicant was required to conform to the standards of the existing zoning districts on this property. 7) That the uses proposed in the PUD Amendment will not have an adverse impact on the reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property and will not be detrimental to potential surrounding uses. 8) That the PUD Amendment is of sufficient size, composition, and arrangement that construction, marketing, and operation are feasible as a complete unit, and that provision and construction of dwelling units and open space are balanced and coordinated. 9) That the PUD Amendment will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets, and other public facilities and utilities, which serve or are proposed to serve the development. 10) That the PUD Amendment, when considered with the overall context of the Eagle Point Business Park, is designed in such a manner as to form a desirable and unified environment within its own boundaries. CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION Based on the foregoing, the Applicant's request for a PUD Amendment hereby approved, subject to the following: a. Easements shall be provided up to the 100-year high water level for all storm water facilities. These easements shall be shown on the utility and grading plans. b. The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City of Lake Elmo related to the construction (and/or expansion) of the storm water facilities on the site. The legal descriptions for all storm water facilities (including access) must be added to the maintenance agreement, and this agreement must be approved and executed by the City prior to the commencement of any work authorized as part of the PUD amendment. c. The applicant shall provide written approval from Xcel Energy to allow the expansion of the parking lot underneath an existing power line easement. d. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan depicting the landscaping materials to the salvaged during construction and replanted on other portions of the site. The plan shall provide for additional plantings along the northern property line to provide year- round screening from the property to the north. The updated landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the commencement of any work authorized as part of the PUD amendment. Passed and duly adopted this 21 day of June 2011 by the City Council of the City of Lake Ehno, Minnesota. ATTEST: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator Dean Johnston, Mayor City of Lake Elmo Planning Department Planned Unit Development Amendment Request To: City Council From: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Meeting Date: 6/21/11 Applicant: Larson Engineering, Inc. Owner: Bremer Financial Services, Inc. Location: 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard Zoning: BP — Business Park Introductory :Information Application The City of Lake Elmo has received a request from Bremer Financial Services to Summary: revise its site plan to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard. The parking lot currently is comprised of 405 parking stalls and the proposed amendment would expand this number to 560 stalls (an increase of 155). The expansion has been requested due to the increase in employment within the facility that has been experienced since its construction in 2002. Property Information: This report and attached information has been updated from the Planning Commission's May 2316 meeting based on the submission of revised plans from the applicant. The Bremer Bank building is located in the northeast comer of the Eagle Point Business Park, which was platted as part of a larger Planned Unit Development in 2001. The Bremer Bank facility received its site plan approval from the City in early 2002, at which point the plans indicated that the total parking stalls planned was 508, with some planned for construction with a future addition. The current conditions plan submitted by the applicant depicts 405 stalls on the site, along with the area that is set aside for a future addition. At this time, the applicant is not proposing any addition or alterations to the building. When the City granted approval for construction of a building on this site, the applicant was allowed to construct only the parking needed to comply with the minimum standards of the code. It was noted in the staff report for the project that the actual surface parking surface installation be limited to 402 stalls until a need for the additional spaces is clearly denionstrated (by employee data from the tenant). With the present application the applicant has submitted a letter indicating that the number of persons employed at the site has increased from 248 in 2002 to 450 today, with an PUT) Amendment Request: Bremer J2ank P 1m2 Lot Expansion Ciry Council Re..pori: 6/21/11 Applicable Codes: average number of monthly guests at 1,200, substantially more than when the building was first opened. As part of the Eagle Point Planned Unit Development, the applicant's property is regulated by not just the underlying BP — Business Park zoning district regulations, but also by the approval documents for the Planned Unit Development. The overall PUD plans were approved by the City in 1999, and contain a written description of the development standards for the park in addition to the illustrative graphics for various elements of the site. Staff has attached two of these documents for consideration by the Planning Commission, including a concept plan and prototypical elevation study depicting the northern border of the PUD area. Section 154.058 BP — Business Park Zoning District. Includes the list of permitted uses and specific zoning regulations for properties zoned BP, Section 154.070 Planned Unit Development. Contains the regulations for a PUD including the application requirements. Findings & General Site Overview Site Data: Lot Size: Approximately 13.5 acres (without small ponding ea Existing Use: Financial Services Existing Zoning: BP — Business Park Property Identification Numbers (PID): 33.029,21.41.0049 and 33.029.21,42.0007 Application Review: The proposed parking lot expansion does not represent a significant change from the plans previously approved by the City, but would result in the removal of some curb lines and landscaped areas with additional parking. The primary parking expansion area would be north of an existing lot, which would reduce the setback from the northern property line from 80 feet down to 20 feet. This area also happens to be located underneath a large power line that runs along the edge of this same property line. The other expansion areas are located fairly close to the existing facility and in close proximity to the future expansion area. In reviewing the PUD for the business park, the proposed expansion deviates from the preliminary plans because it moves the parking area closer to the northern property line than was previously depicted on these plans. The proposed site plan does comply with the other written standards for parking lots as stated in the PUD plans. The General Development Plan approval for the Eagle Point Business Park includes a document that describes the development standards that are to be applied within the PUD area. These standards typically mirror the BP — Business Park requirements, but in certain instances are more restrictive than the underlying zoning requirements. Review Requirements ce.-; 1) .4 inondmellitk,:?;) CC' Et Mtn1iai PI.Tfi Trp:?Rel 6-21-1 f.dor. PUD Amendment Reanest, !framer Baru: Parking Lin' apcinsion Chy Counoil Room (3/2 Pi I Since the parking lot addition only impacts a few of these standards, Staff will focus only on those requirements that apply to the current request. These PUD requirements include the following: • Parking spaces shall be 9' by 18' for all developments north of Hudson Boulevard. The proposed plans match the existing width of existing parking spaces which comply with this requirement. • Primary landscaping materials shall be shade trees, with shrubs, hedges, etc., used only to complement trees, not as the sole means of landscaping. A landscape berm is shown on the northern portion of the Bremer Bank site, and the standards note that id landscaping within the berm is disturbed, it needs to be replaced by NSP (the holder of a power line easement over the berm) or the property owner. The proposed PUD Amendment would amend this development standard since parking is proposed to extend into a portion of the landscaped area. • Minimum parking setbacks: 20' side and 10' rear. The proposed plans conform to these requirements. • Parking ratio: One space for each 250 square feet of office building area or one space per two employees, whichever is greater. The proposed plan well exceeds these minimum requirements, and the applicant has submitted documentation regarding the need for the additional spaces. • Storm Water Control. The City has adopted stricter storm water requirements since the PUD was approved, the new plan conforms to these requirements as per the most recent review by the City Engineer. • Lighting Height: 30'. The proposed plans conform to the height requirement and the light fvaures have been documented to comply with the City's lighting ordinance. In addition to these specific standards, the general development plans also depict a specific setback for the parking area on the Bremer Bank site at the current 80' from the northern property line. The PUD amendment would reduce this setback to 20' as noted earlier in this report. Although the 20' setback is consistent with the general written standards, it would not adhere to the general development plans; hence the need for a PUD amendment, PUD Review: Staff recommended that the Planning Commission continue its review of the PUD amendment to its June 13t1i meeting in order to give the City Engineer time to review revised storm water and erosion control plans for the site. This review has since been completed and the Engineer has found that the project will comply with the City's storm water and erosion control requirements, There are a few comments noted in the updated review from the City Engineer that can be addressed as conditions of approval, which are included in the Staff recommendation noted below. Because the parking lot expansion does not represent a significant expansion of the Land t.;.Nel.. UDs;BA,rner inanja,' PU2.fr .4nieudinervl!;?I' Boni. Pi wq.26' PLID Amendmeru Repast, 1311:9710Bank .)(4.-„ng Lot .E9atiSiOn (7iv Council Report: 6/2//!) use on the site, Staff will not review all PUD and BP District requirements for the purposes of this analysis. The plans that have been submitted conform to the application requirements, and the proposed parking lot will comply with all applicable development standards for the business park zoning district. The proposed project would alter certain elements of the general development plans for the Eagle Point Business Park Planned Development; however, and these changes can be approved through a PUD amendment. If approved, the most significant impact from the parking lot expansion will be the increased amount of storm water runoff from all of the new impervious area. The applicant has addressed the City Engineer's previous comments regarding the erosion control and storm water management plans for the site, and Staff is content that the project will conform to the City's recently updated storm water requirements. The plans call for the expansion of existing storm water retaining ponds, andmake use of existing infrastructure and previous grading that occurred on the site. The other significant impact associated with the parking lot expansion is the loss of existing green space and landscaping. The applicant proposes to minimize these impacts by salvaging as many of the existing trees and shrubs as possible and planting them elsewhere on the premises. An updated landscape plan has not been provided as part of the application materials; however, and Staff is recommending that a new plan be submitted that depicts how and where the reclaimed landscape materials will be distributed throughout the site. The northern property line of the applicant's site is currently occupied by a large power line and associated easement, under which a landscape berm has been planted. This berm and landscaping provides a buffer between the future residential area to the north and the business park, and this berm will be eliminated should the applicant be allowed to expand its parking area. Different alternatives to expanding northward with the parking were considered, but ultimately were found to have the potential for much greater effects on surrounding properties due to the topography of the site. For example, any expansion ofparking to the west of the existing building would have required the construction of a very large retaining wall to gain a modest amount of new parking (new residential development is planned in this direction as well). Based on the parking and employment information submitted by the applicant, there is a need for additional parking on this site. Staff has also observed that at certain times the existing parking is at capacity and employees are forced to parking along Eagle Point Boulevard adjacent to the site. The need for additional parking is further expected to remain a problem for this site once a future addition is built in accordance with the original site plan for the property. With the need for additional parking on the site established, the proposed plans seem reasonable given the lack of options that exist on this property. The loss of the landscape berm is mitigated somewhat by the fact that this area is not useable for much else other that parking because of the power lines. In addition, tall trees would not be an option under the power lines, which minimizes the screening effect of any landscaping that could be painted in this location. In order to compensate for moving the parking lot closer to the north and removing 1L;YA.PUL1.08ivrner Finrrib2e7,' Service:: Anwndincwr1Ren CC brelne;• I Leine Page 4 PUD Amendment Request: Premei Bah., l'arking .l,or aponsion Council Mvort: 6/21// / existing landscaping from this area, Staff is recommending that the applicant, as part of an updated landscape plan, provide as much additional vegetation along the northern property line as is feasible. Of primary concern is filling in any larger gaps in the existing landscape buffer, and addressing the loss of plant materials in the northeastern comer of the site due to the grading work that is planned for this location. The applicant has provided calculations that document the interior landscaping proposed will comply with the City's requirements. On this site, 17,300 square feet of landscaped area is required for the size of parking area proposed, and 19,402 square feet of interior landscaping areas are depicted on the plans. All comments from the City Engineer are referenced below as recommended conditions of approval Resident Staff has not received any feedback from neighboring property owners regarding the Concerns: proposed Planned Unit Development amendment. This action requires a public hearing to be conducted by the Planning Commission at which time members of the . public may address the Commission regarding this application. The public hearing that was opened at the last meeting was continued until June 13, 2011. Additional Information: Conclusion: Council Options: The South Washington Watershed District has reviewed the proposed site plans and found that the work meets their standards. Bremer Financial Services has asked to amend the Planned Unit Development for the Eagle Point Business Park to revise its site plan to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard. The parking lot currently is comprised of 405 parking stalls and the proposed amendment would expand this number to 560 stalls (an increase of 155). The expansion has been requested due to the increase in employment within the facility that has been experienced since its construction in 2002. The proposed PUD Amendment would reduce the parking setback along the northern property boundary of the business park from 80 feet down to 20 feet and -would permit the removal of a landscaped beim that was planted under a power line easement on the northern portion of the site. The City Council has the following options: A) Recommend approval of the Planned Unit Development amendment request; B) Recommend denial of the Planned Unit Development request. The 60-day review period for this application expires on June 25, 2011, but can he extended an additional 60 days if more time is needed. .1".1ivmer FinAnC/:i PI 17: A fm:vtdoWir arenw,- 1)1../D A tnendmetit Request,- Bremer Bank Pcl% • .ort; Lot EA774o7sitm CIty Councif .14port: 6/2 I Planning The Planning Commission is recommending approval of the request from Bremer Commission Financial Services to amend the Planned Unit Development for Eagle Point Business Rec: Park to revise its site plan to expand the parking lot that is accessory to the Bremer Bank Building at 8555 Eagle Point Boulevard, provided the following conditions are met: Easements shall be provided up to the 100-year high water level for all storm water facilities. These easements shall be shown on the utility and grading plans. 2. The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City of Lake Elmo related to the construction (and/or expansion) of the storm water facilities on the site. The legal descriptions for all storm water facilities (including access) must be added to the maintenance agreement, and this agreement •must be approved and executed by the City prior to the commencement of any work authorized as part of the PUD amendment. . The applicant shall provide written approval from Xcel Energy to allow the expansion of the parking lot underneath an existing power line easement. 4. The applicant shall submit a revised landscaping plan depicting the landscaping materials to the salvaged during construction and replanted on other portions of the site. The plan shall provide for additional plantings along the northern property line to provide year-round screening from the property to the north. The updated landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the commencement of any work authorized as part of the PUD amendment. Denial To deny the request, you may use the following motion as a guide: Motion Template: I move to recommend denial of the request by Bremer Financial Services to amend a the Planned Unit Development for Eagle Point Business Park...(please site reasons for the recommendation) Approval To approve the request, you may use the following motion as a guide: Motion Template: I move to recommend approval of the request by Bremer Financial Services to amend a the Planned Unit Development for Eagle Point Business Park based on the findings provided in the staff report... (or cite your own) ...with the conditions outlined in the staff report. cc: John Nemec, Larson Engineering 1. Land (.Liv:Pf..1).6.9 runtePF1i P LID cp CC BritBank P I ..efoc Pape 6 AF L 5 2011 City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM El Comprehensive Plan Amendment El Zoning District Amendment El Text Amendment 0 Flood Plain C.U.P. Conditional Use Permit 0 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) APPLICANT: TELEPHONES: LJ Variance * (See below) 0 Minor Subdivision n Lot Line Adjustment [1] Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan Ej Site & Building Plan Review John Nemec, Larson Engineering, (Name) (MallingAddmms) 651-481-9120 (Home) FEE OWNER: Kathy (Name) TELEPHONES: (Home) Tucci, Bremer Bank, 8555 Eagle Point (Mailing Address) Fee El Residential Subdivision Preliminary/Final Plat O 01 — 10 Lots O 11 — 20 Lots O 21 Lots or More E] Excavating & Grading Permit E Appeal PUD Inc. 3524 Lahore Rd., White Bear Lake, PiLN 55110 (Zip) 651-260-5159 651-481-9201 (Work) (Mobile) (Fax) Blvd, Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (Zip) 651-734-4744 651-247-9222 (Work) (Mobile) (Fax) PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): Lot 1, Block 1, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 3RD ADDITION, according to the plat thereof filed of reonrd in the office of the Registrpr of Titles in arid_ fnr wphiTagton County. Minnpzote (Per CeiLificate of Title No. 58177) AND OUTLOT E, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION, lh. plaL Lhc.cwE Lacd ul 1.c.-LJA. ILL Llic uffLuc uf Lhc uL 71L1oc, fuL Washington County, Minnesota. (Per Certificate of Title No. 59457) DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: Site plan review for parking lot additions, and stormwater management calculations. *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows: In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby agree to pap all statements received from the Citv pertaining to additional application expense. attire of Applicant 0/./ /Date Signature of Applicant Date 1/22/2004 City of Lake Elmo • 3600 Laverne Avenue North • Lake Elmo • 55042 • 651-777-5510 • Fax 651-777-9615 • Bremer Bank April 21, 2011 Bremer Financial Services, Inc. :8555 Eagle Point Blvd Lake Elmo MN 55042 RE Addition of•parking spaces To .whom it may concern at the City of Lake I am writinatayou today aevvelve engaged Larson Engineering tadeSign additional parking due tathe growth -we've enjoyed over the past 8 years at the address listed above. When we movedto our new building in December 2002, weemployed 248 staff:along with ourtanant haVing 40 employees, We currentlyhave 420 parking -spaces which includes handicap, guest and tenant parking, designated spaces for those coming in for training and regular staff. We, arein desperate need of -additional parking -spaces as streetparking is only consistently yiable.April thru October each year: Wehave grown to 450 employees with•the average number of monthly guests 1,200. Our tenant's staff has decreased to 12. It's a tight schedule to get this type -of -work done this year as we've had such a long winter. The work must be done prior to the firstenow, so.we ask you•to strongly consider this request. - If there is further information I can provide, please. let John Nemec of Larson Engineering know and I'll get it to him right away. Thanks so much for your consideration to our request. Respectfully, Kathy Tucci VP Facilities Bremer Financial Services Bremer Service Center Lake Elmo, MN TKDA illell1:4111kittliititt111;1111111.LIN R.)10141114 The right time. The right people, The right emagany MEMORANDUM To: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director 444 Cedar Street, Suite 1600 Saint Paul, MN 55101 (851) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www,Ikda,coTn Reference: Bremer Bank 2011 Parking Lot Copies To: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Addition Proj. No.: 14816.001 From: Ryan Stempski, P.E. Routing: Date: May 16, 2011 As requested, we have reviewed the Bremer Bank submittals for their 2011 Parking Lot Addition. These submittals were provided by Lake Elmo Planning Staff on May 3, 2011, for review and comment. Submittals: 1. Stormwater Calculations by Larson Engineering dated April 22, 2011, received April 25, 2011. 2. Memorandum to City of Lake Elmo by Bremer Bank dated April 21, 2011. 3. City of Lake Elmo Development Application Form, received April 25, 2011. 4. Proposed and Existing Drainage Maps by Larson Engineering. 5. HydroCAD Model of site, including Pre -settlement, Existing, and Proposed Conditions. 6. Report of Geotechnical Exploration by AET, dated March 9, 2011, 7. Construction SWPPP. 8. Full Size Plan Set, dated April 22, 2011 The following comments must be addressed prior to engineering approval on this item: Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control: 2 . The report and drainage calculations, as submitted, are considered incomplete. To simulate existing conditions as "meadow" the existing conditions model should be using "meadow" for the areas to be converted to impervious. As submitted, those areas are modeled using "Grass Cover, Good" which has a higher CN. Proposed discharge rates for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events cannot be reviewed until Item No. 3 has been addressed. Proposed discharge volumes for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events cannot he reviewed until Item No. 3 has been addressed, 4. Typical sections for all proposed infiltration areas must be updated to show soil correction as necessary per soil boring data, Calculation of drain dry times must be provided to ensure water does not pond for more than 48 hours. Seed mix design must be provided for all disturbed areas, An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equat Opportunity Memo Page 2 May 16, 2011 Bremer Bank 2011 Parking Lot • Expansion Review 6. Outlet detail for Infiltration Trench must be provided. 7. Easements must be provided up to the 100-Year HWL for all Storm Water Facilities. 8. A Maintenance Agreement must be provided for all Storm Water Facilities. 9. The location and typical section for a rock construction entrance must be provided on the Plan. 10. Any material to be removed off -site should be identified on the plan with a hauling route identified. General Comments: 1 The parking lot expansion is within an Xcel Power Line easement. Written approval from Xcel Energy to allow this expansion in their easement must be provided to the City of Lake Elmo. 2. A construction schedule must be provided for the project. 3 Parking and storage of construction materials must be done on Bremer Bank property only. Please contact me with any questions or additional comments to this review. TKDA 11:k1CIL'liIkwog The right time, The right people, The right oompang MEMORANDUM To: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Copies To: Jack Griffin, City Engineer From: Ryan Stempski, P.E. Date: June 9, 2011 444 Cedar Skeet, Suke 1500 Saint Paul, MN 55101 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.lkd exam Reference: Bremer Bank 2011 Parking Lot Addition Updated Review Proj. No.: 14816,001 Routing: We have reviewed the updated submittals for the Bremer Bank 2011 Parking Lot Addition. The updated submittals were provided by Larson on June 1, 2011, to address the comments from the TKDA memo dated May 16, 2011, Updated Submittals: 1. Stormwater Calculations and Summary of Stormwater Runoff dated May 23, 2011. 2. Plan Set, dated May 23, 2011. 3. Comment Response Letter dated May 26, 2011. 4, Storm Water Quality Treatment Facility Maintenance Agreement received June 1, 2011, The following comments must be addressed prior to engineering approval on this item: Storm Water Management and Erosion and Sediment Control: . Easements must be provided up to the 100-Year HWL for all Storm Water Facilities. The easements must be shown on the utility and grading plans. 2. The legal descriptions for all storm water facilities (including access) must be added to the Maintenance Agreement. The agreement must be approved by City Staff and executed by both parties. General Comments: 1. The parking lot expansion is within an Xcel Power Line easement. Written approval from Xcel Energy to allow this expansion in their easement must be provided to the City of Lake Elmo. Please contact me with any questions or additional comments to this review. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity May 17, 2011 John Nemec Larson Engineering, Inc 3524 Lahore Rd White Bear Lake, MN 55110 RE; Proposed Bremer Bank. Parking "Expansion Dear Mr. Nemec: SWWD has reviewed your revised submittal dated May 11, 2011 for the proposed Bremer Bank. parking lot expansion. The project as currently proposed meets SWWD standards. Thank you for working to address our Qom-lents and demonstrate compliance. If you have any questions or need additional information, please contact me at 651/714- 3714 or j own ,,trktts. Sincerely, South Was John Loomis Water Resource Specialist District Cc: Ryan Stempski/TKDA; Kyle latt/Lake Eimo LADcrclapcinent Reviewsthitiglictions\ Lake RImairenter Bank1SWWD_Response_05 1720 I I locx , earno.” wr[111.471,411.70,,,,,dda,1,11111411,4126T, A:- , etalanr.runsicm, ;N. 2302 Tower Dr Woodbury, IV1N rf3125 651-714-3729 Fax 651-714-3721 Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 5511D-5126 651.481.9120 Fax 651481.9201 wmciarsonengr.com Larson May 26, 2011 Mr. Klatt City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Ave,'N. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Re: City of Lake Elmo Site Plan Review Comments 2011 Parking Lot Addition Bremer Bank 8555 Eagle Point Blvd, Lake Elmo, MN LEMN Project No: 12106105.000 Dear Mr. Klatt, The following list is in response to the comments from your staff during the site plan review procedure for the Bremer Bank 2011 Parking Lot Addition. I have attached your conunents at the end of this letter for reference. 1. The drainage calculations for the existing grass areas where the new impervious surface is to be placed, was revised to have a curve number of 58, for meadow conditions. 2. The proposed discharge rates for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events were changed to meet the existing condition rates. 3. The proposed discharge volume for the 2, 10, and 100-year storm events were changed to meet the existing condition volume. 4. The details for the infiltration basin, infiltration trench, and permeable paver were revised to show possible soil corrections to provide free draining material at the bottom of the excavations. Storage volumes table for the storm water facilities is provided, to show the draM dry times of each facility. 5 Seed mix designations were added to the plan legend and notes. 6. The infiltration trench will use the existing curb as an overflow outlet; this was discussed with Ryan Stempski, who :mentioned a detail would not be required for this. 7. We are currently writing and obtaining easements for the storm water facilities and pipes. 8. We are currently writing and obtaining a storm water facilities maintenance agreement. Mr. Klatt 2011 Parking Lot Addition Bremer Bank May 26, 2011 9. A note was added to the plans indicating that only one construction entrance from Eagle Point Blvd is permitted, and shall have a rock construction entrance. 10. A note was added to the plan that a haul route will need to be submitted to the city by the contractor. General Comments: L We are currently working with Xcel Energy for written approval to construct the parking lot with in the transmission line easement. 2. A note was added to the plans that a proposed construction schedule will need to be submitted to the city by the contractor. A note was added to the plans indicating that the construction traffic roust abide by the parking regulations of the city and that no overnight parking of construction equipment on eagle Point Boulevard will be permitted. Sincerely, Larson Eng ineerin John A. Nemec III Design Engineer arson 2 of 2 12106105.000 arson 2011 Parking Lot Addition Bremer Bank Service Center Site Drainage SUMMARY OF STORMWATER RUNOFF Introduction: The following report is submitted to the South Washington Watershed District and City of Lake Elmo for the purpose of providing a detailed storm water runoff analysis of the construction for the 2011 Parking Lot Addition, in Lake Elmo, MN. The stormwater analysis includes detailed maps of the existing and proposed runoff conditions, with charts showing rate comparisons and detailing water quality requirements for the proposed stormwater runoff. This project will consist of the construction of multiple new parking lot additions, infiltration basin, infiltration trench, permeable pavers, existing NURP pond modifications and related utilities. Existing Conditions: The existing site is currently an office building with landscaping and bituminous parking. The proposed parking will be located in the existing grass areas. The site has two drainage areas with NURP ponds on the west and south of the site, as indicated on the Existing Drainage Map. Subcatchment area I drains to the existing onsite storm sewer piping and into the existing pond on the property located south of the site. The remaining subcatchment areas drain to an existing northwest pond. This pond has evidence of overtopping and when modeled, a 100yr event will overtop the berm. The new parking addition drainage areas were modeled to the presettlement conditions, this information was used to design the infiltration basin, infiltration trench, and permeable pavers and meet the flow rate and volume of the presettlement conditions for the new parking lot additions. Existing Soils Conditions: The soil borings conclude most of the soils located near the infiltration basin include sandy lean clay in the top 2 feet; below 2 feet consists mostly of gravelly silty sand and silty sand, moist and dense (SP and SM) soils. The soils borings are attached to the end of this report. Analysis: The proposed BMPs and existing NURP pond were analyzed using the HydroCAD Version 8.0 storm water modeling software. SCS TR-20 modeling method, along with the Type II 24- hour storm event were utilized in the modeling of the existing and proposed runoff conditions. The 2-year, 10-year, and 100-year rainfall events were used to model runoff conditions. Curve numbers used are as follows: 58 for meadows, 61 for green space, and 98 for impervious areas. arson Existing Conditions: The east parking area, north parking lot additions, and the parking additions along the drives were modeled separately to determine the change in flow rate and volume. The existing northeast pond was also modeled; this showed the berm to be overtopped during the 100yr rainfall event, with a high water level of 996.76 and an emergency overflow of 996.10 giving a runoff rate of 19.39 cfs. Proposed Conditions: An infiltration basin is proposed to collect the stormwater from the northernmost parking lots. The catch basins prior to the infiltration basin will be constructed with 3 foot sumps to collect sediment. A 4" PVC outlet pipe has been provided to insure the depth of water infiltrated is less than 2 feet, and larger events can be accommodated. The basin has a high water level of 1005.31 with an emergency overflow at 1007.00. As shown on the attached Proposed Drainage Map, the east parking lot will drain to a proposed infiltration trench, and overflow to the existing storm sewer system. The infiltration trench will infiltrate storm water to an elevation of 1012.20, where it will overflow the curb and flow into the existing catch basin. The parking lot expansion on the east will be constructed with permeable pavers, were the storm water will infiltrate during small rainfall events and a 4" perforated draintile, connected to the existing storm sewer pipe, will control larger rainfall events. The parking lot expansion directly north of the building will drain across the existing bituminous and curb and gutter and into the existing storm sewer pipe. With the parking directly north of the building and along the east drive draining to the northwest pond and since this pond has had overtopping problems in the past, we are proposing to extend the surrounding berm to 998.50, and increase the emergency overflow elevation to 997,50. These modifications decreased the runoff rate by 13.9 cfs to 5.49 cfs and decreased the runoffvolume by 11 cf during a 100 year rainfall event. Proposed Outlets: The northeast pond will use the existing outlet size and elevation, but will be removed and replaced to increase the berm elevation, The infiltration basin will have a 6" PVC outlet at an elevation of 1004.45 with a bottom elevation of 1002.50. Smaller rainfall events will fill the basin and infiltrate through the modified soils. The infiltration trench will have a drainage gravel trench with a depth of 4.5 feet to an elevation of 1007, The trench will infiltrate storm water from the 2 year rainfall event, and larger rainfall events will overtop the existing curb and flow into the existing storm sewer system. The permeable pavers will arson have a 4" draintile installed at an elevation of 1011, to provide infiltration in the bottom 0.48 feet of the drainage rock. As the inundation period is defined as the time the high water level in the facility is above the 0.2 feet from the bottom of the facility, the infiltration facilities drain down within 48 hours. The table located at the end of the proposed HydroCAD model illustrates this. Erosion Control & Water Treatment: All flared end outlets will be provided with rip -rap to slow the rate of discharge and provide further sediment removal. Silt fence shall line the grading extents of the project and erosion control fabric will be used on all slopes 4:1 or greater. The adjacent pavement will be swept daily to help control sediment removal from the site. Rate Comparison: The existing and proposed runoff rates and volumes leaving the drainage areas are listed in the tables below, along with high water levels. North Drainage Area 2 vear event Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume Outlet 1.65cfs 23,611cf 1.58cfs 22 ,846cf 10 year event Outlet 100 vear event Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume 3.65cfs 49,931cf 1 3.52cfs 47,645cf Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume Outlet 19.39cfs 98,391cf 5.49cfs 98,380cf South Drainage Area 2 vear event Outlet D year event Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume 0.06cfs 460cf 0.00cfs 0.00cf Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume Outlet 0.39cfs 1,534cf 0.02cfs 152cf 00 vear event Outlet Existing Existing Proposed Proposed Rate Volume Rate Volume 1.21cfs 3,942cf 1 1.24cfs 3,340cf arson High Water Levels Infiltration Infiltration Permeable Northeast Basin Trench Pavers Pond Existing HWL 0.00' 0.000.00 996.76' Elevation Proposed HWL 1005.271 1012.34' 1011.03' 997.21' Elevation Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances PLANNING COMMISSION § 32.025 ESTABLISHMENT. A Planning Commission is continued in the city. (1997 Code, § 210.01) § 32.026 PURPOSE. The Planning Commission is established to meet the requirements of state statute; to develop and enforce the Comprehensive Plan and amendments to the plan, subject to Council approval and the requirements of the Municipal Planning Act; and to review and make recommendations on subdivisions, zoning applications, planned unit developments, and site and building plans as provided by ordinance. No expenditures by the Commission shall be made unless and until authorized for the purpose by the Council. (1997 Code, § 210.02) § 32.027 COMPOSITION. (A) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consist of 9 voting members and 2 non -voting alternate members. The voting members shall be appointed for a 3-year term so that only 1/3 of the appointments will expire on December 31 of each year. Voting members may not serve more than 2 consecutive terms. Appointment to an additional term(s) will be considered with the available applicant pool. Alternate members shall be appointed to serve until there is a vacancy on the Planning Commission. The City Council shall appoint a first alternate and a second alternate who shall become voting members in the order of their appointment upon a vacancy on the Commission. (1997 Code, § 210.03) (Am. Ord. 97-96, passed 1-15-2002; Am. Ord. 97-147, passed 2-15-2005; Am. Ord. 97-200, passed 11-5-2007) (B) Special appointments. (1) At the discretion of the City Council, up to 5 additional appointments can be made to the Planning Coinmission, for each special project, including but not limited to American Legal Publishing Corp. Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances Environmental Management, Maintenance Advisory, and the Old Village, to assist with special projects currently in process, or directed by the City Council to be studied, drafted, and completed. (2) The term of the special appointments shall expire 2 years from the date of appointment, or upon completion of the special project, whichever is first. Any special appointee may request reappointment if the specific project is not completed in that time. (3) (a) Special project appointees shall have full voting privileges only on issues specifically related to the special project. (b) Full voting privileges for the regular Planning Commission shall remain consistent with this section. (Ord. 97-67, passed 1-2-2001; Am, Ord. 97-70, passed 1-16-2001) § 32.028 QUALIFICATIONS. Each member and alternate member shall be a resident of the city. Wherever possible, Commission members should represent all geographical areas of the city and a cross-section of the population of the city at the time of appointment, (1997 Code, § 210.04) § 32.029 REMOVAL. Any member or alternate member may be removed by a 4/5 vote of the Council, for cause, Cause shall include but not be limited to having more than 3 consecutive absences or being absent from more than 1/3 of the meetings in any 1 calendar year. The Council may consider exceptional circumstances when applying this rule. (1997 Code, § 210.05) § 32.030 OFFICERS. The Commission shall elect a Chairperson, a Vice Chairperson, and a Secretary from among its appointed members at the annual meeting each year, for a term of 1 year. The Chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission, if present, and shall perfolin all other duties and functions required by state statute or assigned by the Commission or the American Legal Publishing Corp. 2 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances Council. The Vice Chairperson shall perform these duties in the absence of the Chairperson. If a vacancy occurs in the Chairperson's office, the Vice Chairperson shall assume the Chairperson's duties for the remainder of the year, and a new Vice Chairperson shall be elected by the Commission at a special election to be held at the next regularly scheduled Commission meeting, after at least 2-days written notice to each Commission member. The Secretary shall perform those duties assigned by state statute only. A recording Secretary shall be appointed by the Council to take and keep the minutes and records of the Commission. (1997 Code, § 210.06) § 32.031 ANNUAL MEETINGS. (A) The Commission shall hold an annual meeting the second Monday in the month of January in each year. (B) The meeting shall be devoted to the election of officers and other business as shall be scheduled, (1997 Code, § 210.07) § 32.032 ANNUAL WORK PLAN. The Planning Commission shall meet with the Council at the Commission's first meeting in September each year to develop an annual work plan, including a list of projects, points of interaction on projects, programs, and goals for the following year. (1997 Code, § 210.08) § 32.033 REGULAR MEETINGS. Regular meetings shall be held in the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. No action shall be taken in the absence of a quorum except to adjourn the meeting to a subsequent date. A regular meeting may be canceled or rescheduled by the Commission at a prior meeting or if there are no scheduled agenda items on the Thursday prior to the meeting. All action taken by the Commission shall be by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present. (1997 Code, § 210.09) American Legal Publishing Corp, Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances § 32.034 SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the Commission shall be held in the City Hall at a time and place designated or at a public place at a time designated and shall be called by the Chairperson. Upon the written request of at least 4 members, the Chairperson shall be required to call a special meeting to be held within 7 days of the request. Written notice of the meeting shall be given to all members not less than 3 working days in advance of the meeting. (1997 Code, § 210.10) § 32.035 QUORUM. A quorum shall consist of 5 members. (1997 Code, § 210.11) (Am. Ord, 97-14, passed 9-2-1997) § 32.036 VOTING. Each member attending any meeting shall be entitled to cast 1 vote. Voting shall be by voice vote. If any member has a personal interest of any kind in the matter before the Commission, the member shall disclose the interest and be disqualified from voting upon the matter. The Secretary shall record in the minutes that no vote was cast by that member, Alternate members shall be entitled to cast 1 vote in the absence of any member. The second alternate shall be entitled to cast 1 vote in the absence of any 2 members. (1997 Code, § 210.12) § 32.037 PROCEEDINGS. At any regular meeting of the Commission, the following shall be the regular order of business: (A) Roll call; (B) Approval of agenda; (C) Minutes of the preceding meeting; American Legal Publishing Corp. 4 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances (D) Public hearings as scheduled on the agenda; (E) Old and new business as scheduled on the agenda; (F) Communications; (G) (H) Other; and Adjournment. (1997 Code, § 210.13) § 32.038 RULES OF PROCEDURE. All meetings of the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with the Revised Robert's Rules of Order. (1997 Code, § 210.14) § 32.039 AGENDA. The Chairperson shall cause all items to be considered at any meeting to be placed on a written agenda by the City Administrator or an appointed designee. The City Administrator, or appointed designee, shall advise the Chairperson of any matters the Commission must consider by Council directive, ordinance, or statute and shall have prepared and supply a written agenda of all meetings to all Commission members, the Council, and the public no less than 4 days before each meeting. (1997 Code, § 210.15) § 32.040 RECORDS. Each formal action of the Commission shall be embodied in full upon the minute book as formal motion or resolution. The minutes of each meeting shall be provided to each member, the Council, and the public no more than 7 days after the date of each meeting. The recommendations and findings of the Commission shall be presented to the Council at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. The records of meetings and actions and recommendations shall be transmitted to the City Administrator, or appointed designee, for keeping and distribution. American Legal Publishing Corp, 5 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances (1997 Code, § 210.16) § 32.041 TRAINING. Commission members shall be encouraged to avail themselves of training courses offered by the city, the state, and other government and public training agencies and the Council shall budget for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in training each year. (1997 Code, § 210.17) § 32.042 DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE COMMISSION; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (A) Plan. The Planning Commission shall have the powers and duties given city planning agencies generally by law. The Commission shall also exercise the duties conferred upon it by this code. It shall be the purpose of the Planning Commission to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan for the physical development of the city, including proposed public buildings, street arrangements and improvements, efficient design of major thoroughfares for moving of traffic, parking facilities, public utilities services, parks and playgrounds, a general land use plan, and other matters relating to the physical development of the city. The plan may be prepared in sections, each of which shall relate to the Comprehensive Plan program. After the Commission has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Plan, it shall periodically, but at least every 5 years, review the Comprehensive Plan and any ordinances or program implementing the plan. (B) Means of executing plan. Upon the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan or any section, it shall be the concern of the Planning Commission to recommend to the Council reasonable and practicable means for putting into effect the plan or section in order that the same will serve as a pattern and guide for the orderly physical development of the city and as a basis for judging the timely disbursements of funds to implement the objective. Means of effectuating the plan shall, among other things, consist of a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, capital improvement programming and technical review, and recommendations of 'natters referred to the Planning Commission by the Council. (C) Zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review all proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance, take part in public hearings, and make recommendations to the Council as may be prescribed by the zoning ordinance. (D) Conditional use permits. (1) The Planning Commission may make recommendations on all requests for American Legal Publishing Corp. 6 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances a conditional use permit under the terms of the zoning ordinance. (2) The Commission shall report its recommendations to the Council for action. (E) Subdivisions. The Planning Commission may make recommendations in relation to the subdividing of land as prescribed by the ordinance; the Commission shall report its recommendations to the Council for action. (F) Variances. The Planning Commission shall hear all variance requests from the literal provisions of this code, and shall follow the guidelines set forth in the zoning code. (G) Capital Improvement Program. (1) (a) The Planning Commission shall endeavor to obtain from city officers a descriptive list of proposed improvements for the ensuing 5-year period. (b) The Planning Commission shall also request from the local school district a similar list of its proposed public works. (2) (a) The Planning Commission shall list and classify all the proposed public works and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing year and for a projected 5-year period. (b) The program shall be recommended by the Planning Commission to the Council and to the other officers, departments, boards, or public bodies as have jurisdiction over the recommended planning or construction of the public works. (1997 Code, § 210.18) American Legal Publishing Corp. 7 PROJECT: 2011 PARKING LOT ADDITION VICINITY MAP er Bank Eagle Pohl. Blvd. Imo, MN 55042 anon' cfiS .tenpe..1t4 N Bremer Bank FRAUENSHUH INC. 380 ST. PETER STREET, SUITE 150 ST. PAUL, MN 55102 INDEX OF DRAWINGS T Title Sheet CO.0 Topographic Survey CO.1 Topographic Survey C1.0 Demolition Plan C2.0 Paving and Landscaping Plan C3.0 Grading and Erosion Control Plan C4,0 Utility Plan C5.0 Details E1.0 Electrical Plan E2,0 Photometric Plan PROJECT CONTACTS Project Contact: John A. Nemec III Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Tel: 651.481.9120 Fax: 651.481.9201 Electrical Engineer; Scott Rieger, P.E. Dunham Associates Inc 50 South 6th Street, Suite 1100 Minneapolis, MN 55402 Tel: 612.465.7550 Fax: 612.465.7551 Civil Engineer: Michael A. Murphy, P.E. Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 Tel: 651.481.9120 Fax: 651.481.9201 EiF500YOU 0101 Gopher State One Call TWIN CITY AREA: 061-461-0110 IOU FREE: 1400.267-1100 .0 .o CtS tiO„ (.5 to (9 Z z 0 E •ct Z Z a CO 0 c:C uj r4 a 0" Cl. I hereby certify Mel Ibis plan, eoecifieelMns or report was prepared by nue or under my dined supervision end that I arnn duly licensed Professional Brigham under the laws el itte stale of Minnesota. Michael A. Murphy, PE. Date: 05,03.11 Pen. No.: 420011 Rev, Delo Description Prefect IN 12106105 Drawn By: 0010 Checked By: JAN Issue Dale: 0523.11 Sheet Tree: TITLE SHEET T fritcrolectuNeviven-atenvicann-hreverescencriamerninantercleavitnnnuire0nreirenterNertiteTwer ALl.EXISMIfTEMS AND CORDITIONS titIOUR BE WPM::: RYTHE CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION Sheet: 1 of 10 04 40144 TELEPHOH lona cf0' IW=In02.4 •••• •'' 44 VICINITY MAP: 5 10IH Sr. N SITE VALLEY, CREEK RD CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: EX. SAN MH - RIMP1005 0 INW020.0 . .. Lot 1, Block 1, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 3RD ADDITION, according to the plat thereof flied of record In the office of the Registrar of Tltles in and for Was ningten county, Minnesota. (Per Certificate of Title No, 58177) AND OUTLOT E, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof Illed of rerun In the office of the Registrar of Titles In and for Washington County, Minnesota. (Per Certificate of Title No. 59457) AREAS: LOT I AREA 585,962 SEE FT./13,95 ACRES OUTLOT E AREA = 63,746 SQ. FT./ 1.46 ACRES NORTH 0 40 80 EX. SAN MN --- RIM•1051.1 INVh080.8 FLOOD INFORMATION: BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY 15 IN ZONE 'XOF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL 27163C0335E DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2010. ZONE XIS AN AREA DETERMINED TO BE OUTSIDE THE 0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN BENCHMARK: MnDOT GEODETIC DATABASE STATION #33426. VERTICAL CONTROL DISK STAMPED '8262 AD 1990' LOCATED IN TOP OF FLAILING OF SOUTHBOUND CO. RD. 13 (RADIO D1.) BRIDGE 82543 OVER INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 99. ELEVATION = 1006.33 PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AT SURVEY SITE. ROO X I 061.4 currEli 0.0 ,1414 1411 411g, 1013 6112 111. he *414.4 1011.9 /045 , 104 7 7, r-FiRST FLOOR raV,I()%19 ' .k- 1101(PiPat P010 I 00' %..".A v. lig.. MN EX. Co e RIMettIPPA .5 1INVe-068.60.1) IN0=1:00 q011 SURVEY NOTES: 6 9, 22 BITUMINOUS 4004b 4,21 1041 4. Oti't Lf_ FIELDWORK PERFORMED FEBRUARY 14 - 21, AND MARCH 25, 2011, TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE SHOT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABIUTIE.S. INVERTS WERE TAKEN AS CLOSE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE LARGE PILES OF SNOW WERE PRESENT ON THIS SITE ADDITIONAL UTILITIES AND/Oft PAVEMENT TRANSITIONS MAY OUST UNDER THE SNOW COVER OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE, SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR THE CURB LINES ARE AVAILABLE AS A POINT BLOCK IN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS DRAWING. SHOTS ARE TO THE GUTTER LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTE D. F'ROJECT COORDINATES IN ELECTRONIC FILE ARE BASED THE INASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM. 37 ,,,<‘ 1310.26 40, rtgi°,3% ) 100, N I r-FIRST FLOOR ELS1,101.1.S ,,-,,-.....*ELEOTRIO111A11611116610NLINS,..,,,-..,, e" t"- e , CASEMENT PER DOC. 210CX '1\ -1.4 '1.‘ .4110 j v.noAmto-kanEALatoscAPe A , \ 1160- r r EASEMENT PER DM t094C05) 21X, i N .e,CP e ,„.., 0, / / /024 .‘" f ,,,i,.. mt,gttwFAN.UJAPY.E6§gWaar-,M;P.,,-.---t-ieJ.qiA:1------- ..-2..... ---.2,1-40.W 7-- ----2•2•2-..---t----...--••••• --.2 -2..-2-.2.--,--- 4-10b+1,1,1 ..—_--- ...22-2:22 ---- ------.— _ \,-, • 1 t ' X Loa - " - ' . - ' - IA' Ka r k P1.2P3 20 8 l' - • • , • Trill.3 , \ ,e •L" p22.2 y 1610 ot0.1 4111 INV.1005.4 (SNOW PACX00) INV,1004.91 100.0 40444 Boa Horedlr-‘2, =1619 FT. IV - WO / mim4, cte4 - - -44141 `• 41. 01 io70 00!, $524.3 1 551 021.9 109 10220 1 vo. 4 Iv 1020.6 \ .,--ORAWAGE AND tAtIOny EASEMENT PER EARLE POINT 1 OUSINES9 PARK 3R0 A01511100 I I I 1023 PUT kkg riTIT 0171.0bNOUS DRIVE AND PARKING AREA 10 4000,C00002 EXISTING BUILDING FIRST 0045347 1 E11V=1014,0 11'2, .11 UHIMC.14100 .,AP Pa•-b .2 X X CON:FarE YAW ',01.,c, ' 404 , RE:17.0.110.0 RITLIMINOUB'PARKINOAREAE423-070-,.. Il l \ INVh1007.0 re' "It INVhCovERF.0 \ 5 ., ' „I'' '" - .. 4 hr et 1 .h. v.? attr txxl-A 4, ''. '4# , 0D $ 06' re6 - 6 0! ' 4.0 Its --- 4-.I EX. CO , RIMx1011.1 IN551000.0(SE) 111 INVP1D00.1101 01 010443 c-PROJ. BM f13 1242 , TNI1,1014.70 'e rat a 7°12P ‘,"C1b 44RN4710 40°50 EASEMENT NOTES: is TUMINOUS DRIVE AND 4tAfiRLNG AREA „ h r ,, in 4:02 hollr' ly 1114 'Am 53 ocrP tot? I k I1 SUBJECT TO ELECTRIC TRANSMISSION EASEMENT PER DOC. 21697 SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. 2) SUBJECT TO COVENANTS PER DOC. NO 1855503 AND AMMENDED BY DOC. NO. I I 18152. NOT SHOWN. 3) SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PER DOC. NO 1092 269 NOT SHOWN. 4) SUBJECT TO MONUMENT AND LANDSCAPING COVENANTS PER DOC. NO. I 094005, APPROXIMATE LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY. 5) SUBJECT TO STORMWATER. AGREEMENT PER DOC. 111 0374. NOT SHOWN. ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NOS. 58177 AND 59457. ht, MCC -rrrh RIM•1011.7 ,rr ho INVhSNOWPAOKEDI 8'02" t . 73 •i‘ 40135 • xX7R.5 FLOOTY \ ELEv= rtn 4.0 IP% UTILITY NOTES . I THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATEO FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION/ DUSTING DRAWINGS, THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTIUTIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HEEIOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATE° AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. MOST UTILITIES ARE SHOWN BASED ON MARKING LEFT ON THE GROUND IN RESPONS TO GOPHER ONE LOCATE 'TICKET #11042035E. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTIOTIES, ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. 0.1 A* VACS RCP EX CP 154*1012.5 INVhr1008.6 ",. -PLAN INVERT =1000.0 47 4,53 „e 040104 — — 401 4, • 05 # )1 30.110 RIMP1011.4 14 14,5!' INV•1007.7 -1 *"• PRO/ BM 2▪ t , Tblix1014.12 V h, 0 CEN ,b1‘a 01,1• -.444 tun • 4,0# CUT- 0,1; 14°' 5014 CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI TWIN COT AREA; 651-454-0002 TOLLFREE -00-25Z-1166 10141 , 0. 03724 it a rze 51 14 ,„ X 1030.10 r 1 41 L E 5 VR ...„Eq ,,,.. . 1 ..,,iP .00 \PPR k1.000016.61 .! [ ' ‘" s' 0,,' V.:4 row. Ix otait - r ..... . ..i...'''''' NO 45 ' LEGEND: O DENOTES MONUMENT SET o TELE/ELEC BOX AND MARKED BLS 2571/1 Ar. 51 411511114011 METER/CAS MUER • DENOTES FOUND 71 OAS VALVE MONUMENT As MARKED -.. ELECTRIC LINE WATER VALVES HYDRANT CATCH BASIN/STORM MH CULYERTIF.E.S. SANITARY MANHOLE CLEAN OUT SIGN UTILITY POLE LIGHT POLE TELEPHONE LINE -FIBER op-nc ONE WATER UNE O STORM SEWER LINE SANITARY SEWER LINE .—FENCE — CURB CONCRETE 1 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL BREMER SERVICE CENTER LAKE ELMO, NIINNIES CYTA CONTACT: JOHN NEMEC LARSON ENGINEERING 3524 Labore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110-5100 Phone: (651)481-9120 COUNTY: 'VVAS I -I I I\1 G-T-C:I NJ CD, 1-1 TY" SEAL: THE STATE OF MINNESOTA °Da NOT REQUIRE A SEAL REV)SIONS: DATE FIEVLSION 2,-23-11 INITIAL ISSUE 3-30-1 I ADDL TOM . 11 CERTIFICATION: 1 hereby attar/ that this plan wet prepared by bib, or under ory direct supervIsran, and that I am a duly Licensed Land Avnefor under the laws of the state of MIRNESOTA. carnet L. 0414000 Mien Not 25700 PROJECT LOCATION: 5 5 5 EAGLE POINT BLVDI PID #3302921410049 PID #3302921420007 Sulle 813100 East Chestri 111 Street SNINIBIer, MN 55082 Phone 851.275.0969 Fax 651.275.8876 danigtosstavey .net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVE'YINC, 11 FILE NAME PROJECT NO, SURVLE73 LE01(173 BOUNDARY/TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PAGE 1 OF 2 PAGES FLOOD INFORMATION: BY GRAPHIC PLOTTING ONLY, THIS PROPERTY IS IN ZONE "A' OF THE FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP, COMMUNITY PANEL 27163C0335E DATED FEBRUARY 3, 2010. ZONE XIS AN AREA DETERMINED TO RE OUTSIDE THE 0.256 ANNUAL CHANCE FLOODPLAIN BENCHMARK: • MnOOT GEODETIC DATABASE STATION #33426. VERTICAL CONTROL DISK STAMPED '8282 AD 1990' LOCATED IN TOP OF RAILING OF SOUTHROUND CO. RD, 1 3 (RADIO DR.) BRIDGE 82843 OVER INTERSTATE HIGHWAY 94. ELEVATION = 1001.33 PROJECT BENCHMARK SHOWN GRAPHICALLY AT SURVEY SITE, SURVEY NOTES: FIELDWORK PERFORMED FEBRUARY 14 -21, AND MARCH 2S, 2011, TOPOGRAPHIC FEATURES WERE SHOT TO THE BEST OF OUR ABILITIES. INVERTS WERE TAKEN AS CLOSE TO THE BOTTOM OF THE STRUCTURE AS POSSIBLE. LARGE PILES OF SNOW WERE PRESENT ON THIS SITE, ADDITIONAL UTILITIES AND)OR PAVEMENT TRANSITIONS MAY EXIST UNDER THE SNOW COVER OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE. SPOT ELEVATIONS FOR THE CURB LINES ARE AVAILABLE AS A POINT BLOCK IN THE ELECTRONIC VERSION OF THIS DRAWING, SHOTS ARE TO THE GUTTER LINE OF CURB UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. PROJECT' COORDINATES IN ELECTRONIC FILE ARE BASED THE WASHINGTON COUNTY COORDINATE SYSTEM, VICINITY MAP: CfTY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA. EASEMENT NOTES: SUBJECT TO ELECTRIC EASEMENT PER DOG. 21097 SHOWN GRAPHICALLY, 2) SUBJECT TO COVENANTS PER DOC. NO 106550B AND AMMENOED 8Y 00C. NO, 1 1181 52. NOT SHOWN. 3) SUBJECT TO DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS PER DOC. NO 1092260, NOT SHOWN. 4) SUBJECT TO MONUMENT AND LANDSCAPING COVENANTS PER DOC. NO, 1094005. APPROXIMATE LANDSCAPE EASEMENTS SHOWN GRAPHICALLY, 5) SUBJECT TO STOR MWATER AGREEMENT PER DOC. 11 10374. NOT SHOWN, DOC. REFERS TO PONOING EASEMENT TO THE CITY OVER ALL OF OUTLOT E, THOUGH A SPECIFIC DEDICATION OF SUCH WAS NOT NOTED, ADDITIONAL EASEMENTS OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. INFORMATION SHOWN HEREIN PER CERTIFICATE OF TITLE NOS. 58177 AND 59457. LEGAL DESCRIPTION: , Block 1 , EAGLE POINT -BUSINESS PARK 3RD ADDITION, according to dot thereof filed of record In the office of the Registrar of Titles In and 'ashington County, Minnesota. (Per Certificate of Title No, 58177) AND DUTLOT E, EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 2ND ADDITION, according to the plat thereof filed of recod In the office of the Registrar of TRles In and for Washing ton County, Minnesota. (Per Certificate of Title No. 59457) CAREAS: LOT 1 AREA = SR5,962 Sq. FT.113.45 ACRES OUTLOT E AREA 63,746 SQ. FT./ 1.46 ACRES UTILITY NOTES THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN HAVE BEEN LOCATED FROM FIELD SURVEY INFORMATION/ EXISTING DRAWINGS. THE SURVEYOR MAKES NO GUARANTEE THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN COMPROMISE ALL SUCH UTILITIES IN THE AREA, EITHER IN SERVICE OR ABANDONED. THE SURVEYOR FURTHER DOES NOT WARRANT THAT THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES SHOWN ARE IN THE EXACT LOCATION INDICATED ALTHOUGH HE DOES CERTIFY THAT THEY ARE LOCATED AS ACCURATELY AS POSSIBLE FROM THE INFORMATION AVAILABLE. MOST UTWTIES ARE SHOWN BASED ON MARKING LEFT ON THE GROUND IN RESPONS TO GOPHER ONE LOCATE TICKET #1 10420356. THIS SURVEY HAS NOT PHYSICALLY LOCATED THE UNDERGROUND UTILITIES. ADDITIONAL UTILITIES OF WHICH WE ARE UNAWARE MAY EXIST. CALL BEFORE YOU DIGI TWIN CITY AREA: 651-454-0002 TOLL FREE, 7-R60-252-1106 NORTH 0 40 80 simom LEGEND: 111 AI O DENOTES MONUMENT SET AND MARKED IDS 25718 • DENOTES FOUND MONUMENT AS MARKED +YA WATER VALVES 4 HYDRANT •O CATCH RA5IN15TORM MH p CILVERT/F.E.S. ® SANRARY MANHOLE a CLEAN OUT SIGN UOLr1Y POLE LIGHT POLE .os n A 3 TELE/ELEC ROX ELECTRIC METER/GAS METER GAS VALVE ELECTRIC UNE TELEPHONE LINE FIBER OPTIC LINE WATER LINE STORM SEWER UNE SANrTARY SEWER LINE FENCE - CURB CONCRETE 1 FOOT CONTOUR INTERVAL BREMER SERVICE CENTER LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA CONTACT: JOHN NEMEC LARSON ENGINEERING 3524 Lahore Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110-5100 Phone: (651) 481-9120 COUNTY: WAS H I N GT©IV CC) r J SEAL: THE STATE OF MINNESOTA DOES NOT REQUIRE A SEAL REVISIONS: DATE REVISION 2-23-11 INITIAL ISSUE 3-30-11 ADM TOPO CERTIFICATION: �i1 1 11 1 11 I A hereby certify that 161s plan was prepared by me, or under my direct supervlsien, and Mat I am a duly Licensed Land 5otveyer under the laws of the state of MINNESOTA. ' bo4Iel on No: 25718 pate, 02-23-1D PROJECT LOCATION: 3 5 5 5 EAGLE POINT BLVD. PID #3302921410049 PID #3302921420007 Sidle 41310D East Chestnut Sheol 511INyater, MN 56082 Phone 651.275.8869 Fax 651.275,13076 dorl@cs5urvey ,net CORNERSTONE LAND SURVEYING, INC FILE NAME PROJECT N0. SURYLE73 LE01073 BOUNDARY /TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY PAGE 2 OF 2 PAGES 4014.11,...9,a15101.411911M • d NO111101,113G BREAK LINE 1 ;‘, ____t____;: L ,.. Project Tekr. 2011 PARKING LOT ADDITION BREMER BANK 8555 EAGLE POINT BLVD. LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 BREAK L NE ,!: \ : r us no rn 0 g z r z FRAUENSHUH INC. 380 ST. PETER STREET SUITE 150 ST. PAUL, MN 55102 N3 0314V14 CINV a see ease 1-9 0 =i 0 m - -1 0 A 0 M -0 0 r < m m > m di. 0 NI.LSIX3 rn HS ONLLSIX3 40 ssodsla ENV, P A rrl '< z 0 = > m 2 X 0 40 3504310 Q NV '3A01438 anom AVd 3.1.310NOD 0 SAWCUT, REMOVE. AND DISPOSE OF EXI SIX340 3504310 I:NV.3/043H '1 Z 0 0 CO 0 o z co ?o' z Xt c Z 0 Z M 0 Z, 0 zco M rn Z M 100 —1 0 m-n 0) 5 p 0 z GN3031 108WAS Larson Engineering, Inc. 3524 Lebare Road White Bear Lake, MN 55110 651,481.9120 (0 551.481.9201 werw.lersonengr.com 02011 Larson Engincerhg, Inc. All rIghin Merck. 6. CLE EACKFILL WITH NEW FOOD DUALITY TOPSOIL AND SOD or, OE IELEP! BOX—. FEs .1111V.OE81J1J -100r.j.14 wOr.,..1002. J 7. IN U PAVEMENT ‘t' 3Lr 7,1„, 0 rill r71.111.7-41- "2-"' ; TO--- • EXISTING SUBORADE SOIL BULKHEAD CURB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE M4,4.14.Ss'S • 2,R3SSISU..SsrsorSrsh SSP asssoirs. US* sosle. Sestatxrdifru RorliSSISSC2.0ss GREGATE • ILL VOIDS wiry' 3/8" TRAPROCKJGRANITE CHIPS OU-AND GRAND PERMEABLE PAVER 2' FINI STONE " HIP REMOVE NON -FREE DRAINING SOILS AND REPLACE VV IT H SAND TO A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 5 FEET. o 18" BASE STONE (WASHED 1^ CLEAR) WOVEN SOIL. S EPA RATI ON FABRIC OVED SUBORADE SOIL 4^ PERFORATED PE DRAIN PIPE PERMEABLE PAVER CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE JJ , I ; J I : trWi.2 iht,-.1t181.S. (SNOW l'''SOSS'S) ITS J5V..1004,9) (1;:-•-• "1,S NOTES 1. Contractor must submit o construction schedule and haul route diagram to the shy of Lake Elmo prim to construction. 2, Cortstrvotlan vehicle perking on Engle Point Boulevard shall not emend overnight and shell abide hy local regulations. WHERE APPLICABLE, DIMENSIONS ARE FROM BACK OF CURB TO BACK OF CURB OR BACK OF CURB TO END OF STALL LINE, 1 I ; T-T-1"4-71,31 RCP I n""r 1 fl, I I !II I lex! f rtil4;;;;Itwo'.• tsv-io;)e.aIsr) fililf.111;;;;11 1,;1[1..!111 ;;. " Lnaoso.swo-`, ; / PT ril)T777777 1 0171777777 f oslossirsrs OCR 2 CURB ST. VS mu.. 1 OS1.0 it444.1rw.o . I J! t.f • 0;1 1 J 1 I j 1 I j If 11/4 I If tl . I Ex. Er( 3 I ! ! I I ! I :oar i • - I J• 611. Rrkiv I;: I t,i T,(woweeewety.v..-- jj SYMBOL LEGEND I I ."."... ".".` .^ NEW 2.5BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT OVER 7' AGGREGATE BASE SEE DETAIL 1/C5.0 PERMEABLE PAVERS OVER 2V DRAINAGE ROCK SEE DETAIL 2/C2.0 NEW 4' CONCRETE PAVEMENT OVER 5' AGGREGATE BASE SEE DETAIL 2/C5.0 SHORT NO MOW NATIVE SEED MIXTURE WITH WILD FLOWERS REPLANT SALVAGED TREES WITH TREE SPADE, SEED MIX328 5JJ14,.. Sji." 6/1 FLU H CURB U CU OE c • rr, 4,••• L:11 8S. . 06 20 40 All EXISTING OEMS AND CONSIRONS BMUS BE VERIFIED 10'MS CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCTION Sheet d L') Z W w Cr) Z , < cn LLI Z Z 0 > g x M LI) Z Lr) < Z Z co 5 [1. ' w w 0 _1 0 I hasoby codify Nall)* plan, tpaacationo or report was artisar56 by mo or under my &eel supordolon and NEI I am a duly licensed Frarasslonol Engineer titular Ow laws - of Via Male of iidnnesole. Micheal A. Marshy, P.E. Balm D5.23,11 Rag. No.: 42000 Rev. bare D000ripaon ProlocIN 1210E1105 Drawn By: KBK Chocked By: JAN lssuo Bata: 05_23.11 Shoal TItka PAVING AND LANDSCAPING PLAN C2•O 0 0 3 5 of 10 EROSION CONTROL N ZS 1. Owner and Contractor shall obtain MPCA-NPDES permit Contractor shell bo responsible for ail lees pertaining to this permit, The SWPPP shell be kept ensile plan dines. 2, Install temporary oroolon control measures (Inlet protection, sill fence, end rock canslrudlon entrances) prior 10 beginning any excavation or demolition work at the site. 3. Erosion control measures shown on the erosion control plan are the absolute minimum. The contractor shall Install temporary earth dikes, sediment turps or basins, additional siltation fencing, endfer disk the loll parallel to the contours ee deemed necessary to further central erosion. All changes shall be recorded In the SWPPP. 4. The toe of the slit fence shall he Trenched Ina minimum of 5'. The bench beckfrll shall be compacted with a vibratory plate compactor. 5. All grading operations shall be conducted Ina manner to minimize the potential for site erosion. Sediment control practices must be established on all down gradient perimeters before any up gradient land disdurbing actvitlas begin. ILT FENCE (TYPICAL) V"RIP RAT? 1007 999.60 G 6. All exposed soil areas must be stabilized as soon as possible to limit soli erosion but In no rase later then 7 days after the construction activity In Thal portion of the she has temporarily or permanently ceased. Temporary stockpiles without significant silt, clay or orgonio components (e.g„ dean aggregate stockpiles, demolition concrete stockpiles, sand stockpiles) and the constructed base components of roads, parking lots and similar au rfo see are exempt from Uds requlremenl. 7. Pipe outlets meal be provided with energy dissipation within 24 hours of connection to sudeca wa10L 8 All rlprap shall be Installed wflh a filler material ar soli separation fabric and comply with lire Minnesota Department of Torn spartaUon Standard SpedOcaUons. 9. All storm sewer catch basins not needed for site drainage during construction shall be covered to prevent runoff from entering the storm sewer system. Catch basins necessary for site dminuge during construction shall be provided with Inlet protection. 10. In areas where concentrated Bows occur (such as swales and areas In rmnt of storm catch basins and Intakes) the erosion control facilities shall be booked by stabilization structure to protect those (edibles from the concentrated flows, OOB.40-TC`- 007.90 GL` `;•' INFI LTRgTJON, Bi 10 007,54 IAA 10)1.24 t ,r=-z+l.. RIP RN (Dlttlll: Ln FRG.W AEOuv, PHOTO1 11. Inspect the construction site once every seven days during aegvo 'omWctlon and within 24 hours after a rainfall avant greater than 0.5 Inches In 24 hours, All Inspections shell be recorded In the SWPPP, 12. All slit fences must ha repaired, replaced, or supplemented when they became nonfunctional or the sediment reaches 113 of the height of the fence. These repolrs must he made within 2h hours of discovery, or as soon as field conditions allow access. All repairs shall be recorded in the SWPPP, 13. I f sedi m ant esra pas the construction silo, off -site accumulations of sediment must be removed In a manner and ale frequency sufficient to minimize 0fhslle Impacts. 14. All solls tracked onto pavement shall be removed daily. 15, All Infiltration areas must be Inspected to ensure Thal no sediment from ongoing construction activity le reaching the Infiltration area and These areas are protected from compaction due to construction equipment driving across the Infiltration area. 16. Collected sediment, asphalt and concrete millings, Boating debris, paper, plastic, fabric, eonshudlon and demolition debris end other wastes must be disposed of propody and must comply with MPCA disposal requirements. 77 GL"' ,s" >AxasaAt i7lTiir'17,n'77 HARD SURFACE/ PUBLIC ROAD -. 1 "-2" WASHED ROCK 6' MINIMUM 014,30 B" INLET PROTECT10703" -(TYPICAL) ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE GRADING NOTES 1. Tree protection consisling of snow hence or safely hence Installed al the ddp Ilho Shall be In place prior la beginning any grading or demolition work at the site, 2. All elevations with an as le de (') shall be no Id vedfled. If elevations vary significantly, notify the Engineer for lu rlher In st adore, 3. Grades shown In paved Drees represent finish elevation, 4, Restore all disturbed areas with 4' of good quality topsoil and hyd mimed, with MNDOT Seed Mixture 200. 5. Ail construction shall be performed In accordance with state and local standard Specifications for construction. O. Slopes 4:1 and greeter shell ho covered with erosion control fabric. 7. Only ono construction entrance off Eog1e Paint Boulevard Is acceptable and must Include a rock constructor ontranao. 17. Olf, gasoline, paint end any hazardous subsloncas must be properly stored, Including secondary containment, la prevent spills, leaks or other discharge. Reelected access to storage areas must be provided to prevent vandalism. Storage and disposal of hazardous waste must be In compliance with MPCA regulations, 10. External washing of trucks and other construction vehidee must be limited to a defined area of the site. Runoff must be contained end wealo properly disposed of. Na engine degreasing Is allowed ons0e. 19. All liquid and solid wastes eonemien by concrete washout operations must be contained In a look-preol containment facility or Impermeable liner. A compacted clay liner That donna' allow weshoul liquids to enter ground wafer Is considered an Impmmeable liner. The liquid and oolld wastes must not contact the ground, and Them must not be runoff from the concrete washout operations or areas. liquid and solid washes must be disposed of properly end In compliance with MPCA regulations. A sign must be installed adjacent to each washout facility to Inform concrete equipment operators to t alze the proper facilities. 20. Upon completion of the project and stabilization of all graded areas, all temporary erosion control facltlltos (silt fences, hay bales, ale,) shall be removed from the sale, 21. Contractor shall submit Notice of Termination for MPCA-NPOES pennll wlMn 30 days after Final Stabilization. 1 IEx.1 t01LI lrt9 n1V=10J0 C)SE) If IV., Icon,' kz) ILT FENCE (TVPIGAJ t1022 j-. `1020t1°21 .1015,62 15A2 013.60 GL 1 1019.2 1013.04 FUTURE BUILDING . 1012.64 0 12.70 G SPOT GRADES B = BITUMINOUS GL=GUI leRLtNE TC - TOP OF CURB BR = BOTTOM OF ROCK TR =TOP OF ROCK ' = FIELD VERIFY PITOA, 13id Zq.. - 1u 11PE=1014.il,./ _ 10 011.00 re s.1007.00 012,89 TC" n CONOR gh'S 411090tl BE f OWNED NORTH 40 TOR dRRohe CONSTR0DISON Sheet z rr V Z z© I- cc I hereby certify that this plan, \speoflcotons or report was prepared by me or under my direct supervision and Mel I am a duly licensed Prelesslonal engineer under the laws of the slala of Minnesota. Ildwel A. Murphy, P.E. Dale: 06.23.11 Reg, Nu,: 4250a Date Description Project 4: 12100105 Drawn By: NBK Chocked By: JAN Issue Bete: 05.23.11 Sheet Title: GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL PLAN C3.0 0 of 10 3' w z OE HAP CONSTRUCT TES: 1) THE INFILTRATION AREAS SHALL BE PROTECTED FROM CONSTRUCTION TRAFFIC, 2) ONLY LOW IMPACT EARTH MOVING EQUIPMENT SHALL BE ALLOWED IN THE INFILTRATION AREAS, 3) THE INFILTRATION AREAS ARE NOT TO SE EXCAVATED TO FINAL GRADE UNTIL THE CONTRIBUTING DRAINAGE AREAS HAVE BEEN CONSTRUCTED AND FULLY STABILIZED. 05 ;1, 0000 IELEPIION , 06 4: PER PLAN PLACE 2' OF COMPOST IIV ND DT GRADE 2) AND 1OF TOPSOIL THEN BLEND 6' DEEP INTO EXISTING SANDS. V NON-FRFE DRAINING D REPLACE WITH SAND TO A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 5 FEET. INFILTRATION BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE INFI LTRAFI CE 25 L —‘,MFfERGQIND MITERED END GRATE 2 INV:1004.40.„<RATE 1 I9.45 21 LF d'IPVC 01.. FEZ )1b! 0,25% 10 a • 1,4v-, loc '74: . riN,100r 12'1 ?' luv13024; aigi01). .1NY.-M0 \ :\ 51 kL15.50.+Airoloot ELIO1245+81F55. glamor au* Pkt+ Expito+5,1, LeksemolG.DoeIgn10,555++011+451681.5 TINO SOILS --- -1%1 OE lif+ • ll E:- 63 -INV,1003.90-L— 205 LF 121-10PE gp1.834S' II; ,,,.. -.:•.-- nr„ 111 M A 0, ,I / 1 il 1 L'e 1 CD 2 1 )"HOPE - R1M:1007.54 I f RIM:1011.31 .25 I6V:1034.04 BTM:1 31, —1 ' iINVI1007.81 DTM:1034,t /Loh! A.S 4..EP PA. RIP RAP- manalm MOM—. AERIAL 05101 — TL LL-LL:L4L 1 1 REMOVE NON -FREE DRAINING '-- SOILS AND REPLACE WITH SAND TO A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF 5 FEET. INFILTRATION TRENCH NOT TO SCALE '16- Ers; ..'-11•X' 1lO15+1011.2 INV.DOELF (VIVO PACKED) (NAL 1ici.-5000510) F PEA CFLAVEL ABOVE FABRIC VEL NON -WOVEN SOIL SEPARATION FABRIC• 'MIRAFI 1702'l OR MAL' .+5'••••- 07 - - — — UTILITY NOTES 1. It Is the responsibility of the conlrector lo perform or coordinate all necessary utility con necilons and relocations from existing utility locations to the proposed ensile mingle. these connections Include but are not limited to water,sonitary sewer, cable IV lelephone, gas, electric site %habit), etc. Z All service connections shall be performed In accordance wiM stale and local standard opetyliceilons lor constructIon. 3. The contractor sholl nollty all eppropriele engineering deperimento end LIIIIILy companies 72 hours prior to consirution. 411 necassery precautions shall be made to avoid damage to existing LGSMs. 4. The contractor shall verify the connection pipe elevagon priorto eny uillity work. If different Own shown notify Ose Engineer immedialely. 5. See Project Speclficllons for heeding requirements. 5I —332 LF 12'1FIDPE 51I 0.413YX re - - (Ik• .. .., .. .. LI Ili,' 111111111EXICO;--,ji N'10,-1011.1" illYbti 0151 Of ST) 145.100EI(E) CB.1 RIM:1012.91 1NV:1009.41 FITM1006A1* Iii,t +LI,1 1 1111 t II + I + I I 1 1 I I + I 00,0 'Ott '1•:,,••-•4-,-,:+; 63 1.17=7,11.1.111.11.11, 'g 00310014e011 11771Tilr1,f? 77771711771771 ,;./ , fit/ • ; 440,,,...IINWW.ilit Li Pi .+1022 .0"0 ,;F:f+.,+- LI '••\*,• OFF Aft,tEE ool..E t.ti1,111:11:1111.11:11,1C .,.., . EY. ST 638 E63.10111.0 OW.. 011.0 riOCoVEOEO o, wFV,1041.-bI 1t V ;ir mrTAC, 1 '' iiI.IIIIIIIiiiIII too..., i -,•,--,,,,,i-,,,,,,,,".,1.--..........-r-- bfb5,-4...; ,, -4, ..), : , i . i I I I I I - I I I i i I '0j I i I . 1 . 1 i I 1 t 1 . I I •- 1 I bl "1i 4ii, ...,..-.......-_, I I , III +II 1 g 1 Jm4"O„."'-'• ar,1(,-; .41/1405,' Pik3/4W OE 110 OE —4- — Cr.E. 00 1411,111,111, , 16104 .4141O \ -Pi. AN WART F4410%0 FUTURE BUILDING OE OE OE • Lit. 4" PERFORATED OA% NEW DRIVE OVER CAST1N v?„ 100011)11152 . 1 EN:,I7 •(Frti firN Lt" F.F+M -5 11108,4 6306- vly NFILTrkTI0N TRENCH 74" TOP1011.00 113714:10 ZOO 20 40 Sheet ALL EX$1110 Man AND CONorro$ aiicoULD I3E VERIFIED IN ?HE CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONSTRUCT/CM 5 I hereby certify Ihet this plan, epoc111 cubes or report Wee Prelbered by me or under my died super:Wake and Mai I am a duly licensed Professional Engineer under the bore of the mote of Minnesota. Micheal A. M.rphy, P.E. Dale: 05.23,11 Reg. No.: 42808 Rev. Dare Derolollerl Proleett 12100105 Drawn By: (OK Checked By; JAN Isom Dale: 0523.11 Share IJTILITY PLAN C40 7 02 10 BACKFILL WITH NEW GOOD QUALITY TOPSOIL AND SEED 111 BACKFILL WITH NEW poop DUALITY TOPSOIL AND SEED NW2b116TUMIN0US PAVEMENT (MVO) 7'81,00 A60G8EWTE TING SUBGRADE SOIL BITUMINOUS CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 4" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 12' NEW Brrumwous PAVEMENT BASE AGGREGATE EXISTING SUBGRADE SOIL B612 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER DETAIL NOT TO SCALE "PORTIANIT EMENT CONCRETE 1I1' NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT FLUSH CURB DETAIL NOT TO SCALE ASE AGGREGATE 12" NEW GRANULAR io BACKFILL ACCESSIBLE RAMP DETA WITH TRUNCATED DOME NOT TO SCALE MANHCLE FRAME & COVER: NEENAH R-2546, TYPE C GRATE MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 5 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH AND A 4" COLLAR ON THE OUTSIDE, NO SHIMS OF ANY MATERIAL ALLOWED. CATCH BASIN / MANHOLE FRAME DETAIL NOT TO SCALE a 1 1 PLAN SECTION MANHOLE FRAME & COVER: NEENAH R.2561, TYPE C GRATE NEENAH R.3067, TYPE L GRATE (HIGH FLOW) MINIMUM OF 2, MAXIMUM OF 6 CONCRETE ADJUSTMENT RINGS WITH FULL BED OF MORTAR BETWEEN EACH AND A 4" COLLAR CN THE OUTSIDE. NO SHIMS OF ANY MATERIAL ALLOWED. V PRECAST REINFORCED CONCRETE SLAB SEAL WITH 2 BEADS OF RAM -NE K. MANHOLE TO HAVE '0 RING RUBBER GASKETS PRECAST CONCRETE SECTION WATERTIGHT CONNECT ION (BOOT, TYPICAL) " MINIMUM SLAB THICKNESS, 6MINIMUM DIAMETER PRECAST CONCRETE SLAT, REINFORCED WITH 64 RESAR 0" E.W. CATCH BASIN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 63 RED DRAIN GRATE CR INFORMATION SEE WEB SITE ATIAWW.MITEREDDRAIN.COM (707) 620-0005 FLOW MITERED END GRATE DETAIL 20' PLAN NOT 'ro SCALE (ELEVATION -SEE PLAN) :3 EXTEND FABRIC 1 FOOT BEYOND LIMITS OF RIP RAP WITH MINIMUM 1 FOOT OF COVER (TM.) VARIES (E0E-SEE FLAN GEOTEXTILE FABRIC PLACE RIP RAP ON 6 INCHES OF 2 INCH ROCK BEDDING OVER GEOTEXTILE FABRIC —CL II RIP RAP EOTEXTILE FABRIC RIP RAP ON CIF 2. INCH K BEDDING OVER T ILE FABRIC — CL, II RIP RAP SECTION A -A MOUND LAST 2 FEET OF RIP RAP 1 FOOT DEEP (TOP OF RIP RAP SHALL BE LOWER THAN OVERFLOW ELEVATION) SECTION B-8 63 XTEND FABRIC 1 FOOT BEYOND Limits OF RIP RAP WITH MINIMUM 1 FOOT OF COVER (TYP.) TYPICAL RIP RAP WEIR OVERFLOW NOT TO SCALE 50 (10' MIN.) 4 4 PLAN SC) OW MIN.) SECTION A -A NOTE: FW360 MIRAFI FABRIC OR EQUAL BACKFILL WITH NEW GOOD QUALITY TOPSOIL AND SEED II i -IT11. .7.11t171‘1 '7171-11iEr '11:/r11, 17:1 2' WOVEN FILTER FABRIC — MN/DOT 011,03 III RIP -RAP MNIDOT CLASS III RIP -RAP RIP -RAP AT OUTLETS NOT TO SCALE FA 15" 6" PORTLAND CEMENT CONCRETE FLUSH CURB DETAIL TER -1-- NEW BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT BASE AGGREGATE 12" NEW GRANULAR BACKFILL 12' .1.1.1.1.6.4••••• VEHICLE PARSINe ONLY MAINTENANCE PARKING ONLY SIGN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE PLAN 400 MICRON FILTER BAG IN EACH BASKET 12' WOOED OP TO ON WE fOR ISKAICO 7 a CCESSIBILITY SIGN 2.5 LB/FT. FLANGED CHANNEL SIGN POST (MNDOT 3401) :?" FA KING VEHICLE 10 REQUIRED UP TO $200 F1NE FOR MIMI ON ACCESSIBLE PARKING SIGN DETAIL NOT TO SCALE !NITER AREA [WWI OW AREA !MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE IO 7' NEAP) !MAXIMUM OVERFLOW RATE ( tor 5" HEAP) ITAOKET WEIGHT IEMPro 'EMMET WEIGHT 1EULL.AfTROX.1 0.65 rr2 o.4 2 ET' 1.99 C e5 2.79 CI'S I LB 45 LES —2 BASKETS wrur 400 MICRON FILTER BAGS. TO BE CHECKED PERIODICALLY AND CLEANED OUT AFTER EACH RAIN EVENT FITS NEENAH 1642 AND 1733 FRAMES OR EQUAL PROFILE INFRASAFE INLET 14 (OR EQUAL) NOT TO SCALE WIRE MESH REINFORCEMENT (OPTIONAL) ENGINEERING FARRIC CFI I METAL, WOOD POST, OR STAKE. 01 MAX, SPACING, 2' INTO GROUND. \ DIRECTION OF F0-11"1°F NATIJRALSOIL ABRIC ANCHORAGE TRENCH, BACKFILL WITH TAMPED NATURAL SOIL 6: NOTE DEPENDING UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO WIRE MESH wrrH HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS WITH WIRES, OR WOOD POSTS WITH STAPLES, SILT FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE (.5 UJ C4 01) _r Z LLI Fir L2.1.1EngineerIng,IncAll right 1 hereby esellly teal %Is plan, speeDcallons Of roped wan prepared by me or Offer my direct aupervisIon end the( I am a duly Wormed Profeselonel Engineer under Iho laws the stale of lOnno0o1o. eel A. Murphy, P.E. 1314a: 0523,11 Rag. No.; 42006 Rsu. Dela Dasseplian Project 6: 12100106 Drown Ry: KOK Checked By: JAN Issue °etc 05.3.11 Sheet Dew DETAILS C5.0 tOPInselaWfWeaa • WOO11240O10O. Otto.. Bork fto txposoon, Woo OmOW. OfflogeDooffw P1166\10006 CO.Owo NOT TO SCALE ALLOUSYINOITEMSAsMeONortIONSOHOuLDOeVEsuFIED TeECONTRAoTOReeP0fiecONSTRI1OTION SIMat' 0 of 10 OE — OE DE --- F 7U1F 1 ETT'ER 3Y AA2 BB 25, 2,2 SINGLE HEAD LIGHTING POLE DUAL HEAD LIGHTING POLE IGH E HEM NG POLE VUI: f 480/ 277 I480/ 277 AA2 25,27,29 MOUNT:NG LAMPS 24' SQUARE STEEL POLE 1-400H PS 24' SQUARE—_......_.W....._. STEEL POLE 2-400HPS t 480/ 15' SQUARE 1277 STEEL POLE 1-150HPS .i OE I1 (# 27 25 29 ilr 1J LUMINAIRE ONI Il01. IAEOIA (1.171N0, L)I NEP,F..TC, TEMPERED N5 PE I1L O(STRIBUTIDN FLAT CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS LENS (1) TYPE III DISTRIBUTION (1) TYPE N DISTRIBUTION FLAT CLEAR TEMPERED GLASS LENS TYPE III DISTRIBUTION DSHERH_ NoTI':£. 1. SEE LIGHTING SPECIFICATION SECTION E0R ADDITIONAL LIGHT FIXTURE REQUIREMENTS. 2. ANY CONFLICTS BETWEEN THE MANUFACTURER'S CATALOG NUMBER AND THE DESCRIPTIONS, SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE ATTENTION OF THE ENGINEER. 3, ALL FLUORESCENT FIXTURES WILL BE SUPPLIED WITH PROGRAM START ELECTRONIC BALLAST UNLESS SPECIFICALLY NOTED OTHERWISE. 4. TO INSURE MATCHING COLOR AND APPEARANCE, ALL LAMPS SHALL 8E FROM THE SAME MANUFACTURER, LAMPS SHALL HAVE COLOR TEMPERATURE 6000R, WITH CR) OF B5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED. 5, LUMINARES WITH T5 OR SMALLER COMPACT FLUORESCENT LAMPS SHALL NAVE BALLASTS/LAMPS WITH ENO OF LIFE POWER UNIT, 1. UNLESS A SPECIFIC CATALOG NUMBER OR SERIES 15 NAMED, THE MANUFACTURERS NAMED AS ALTERNATES MUST SUBMIT CATALOG CUT SHEETS, IES FORMATTED PHOTOMETRIC REPROT ID THE ENGINEER FOR APPROVAL AT LEAST 10 DAYS PRIOR TO THE BID DATE. THE ENGINEER IAAY REQUEST SAMPLE OF FIXTURE TO BE SUPPLIED. SCHEDULE VANI.JEA!; E it; it;R'1D SERIFS, :41.iAi88ER2, CITATION #CTM SERIES ITATION #CTM SERIES McGRAW—EDISON #CS5 SERIES ES. AA2 25,77,29 I ,27,29 I! I! Hill hill? H ill/11) NOTES FOR THIS DRAWING 1"c.—(3)#B & (1)#BOND. 2 INTERCEPT EXISTING UNDERGROUND LIGHTING CIRCUIT AT EXISTING LIGHTING POLE, EXTEND CIRCUITRY TO NEW LIGHTING POLES AS SHOWN. I i0r4INAIRF UESCRT' E014 I BLACK FINISH FOR HEAD AND POLE. I MULTI —TAP BALLAST, SQUARE BASE COVER, BLACK FINISH FOR HEAD AND POLE. MULTI —TAP BALLAST. SQUARE BASE COVER, BLACK FINISH FOR HEAD AND POLE. EXTERNAL HOUSE —SIDE SHIELD. MULTI —TAP BALLAST. SQUARE BASE COVER, SEE DETAIL 1, THIS SHEET, FOR POLE BASE INFORMATION, / f 21,23 OE OE OE FUTURE BUILDING HP—E-1s ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN /32" = 1'-0„ OE OE ,2 OE DE OE 95 25,27,29 0E 0E DE 25,27,AAI 29 OE OE ECTRIC NORTH U z I hereby oerli y Ihet ails plan, epe1lfi0fi4na or roped woo pmpnmd by me or under my direct stlparv4We end that I am a duly licensed Pmfesaimmi Engineer under the Imes of Ma stela of Minnesota. Date: 05.12,11 Reg. No.: 45412 Rent nab) Description Pmloct A: 04-11155 Drawn By: GJR Checked By: 05.12,11 Item Dote: 05,12.11 Sheet TlOO: ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN E1.0 "-N NM,vi.R)u�x, C.s.1✓Css.ms7 t LCCA!14ho-ree ran, ku,. 041, M1E2i.,rdirrol10.W 89L E%184iN411E489 Mt CONDITIONS- SHOW) VE 504101ED 'NINE CONTRACTOR BEFORE CONOTRUOTKM at 1 0.0 010 'an 'OA 0.9 0.0 '0.1 '0.1 '9.1 'a i '0.0 0.1 0.11 01 '0.2 08 A4 'OP OA 'an 'ad '¢y .4 0.0 '0.a 'a1 '0,t $1 es '0.1 01 'O,1 '0.1 01 00 '0.0 '0.t '¢1 '0,i '0,1 'n.1 'at '¢1 'at '0.t 'lila-mP.1....01._.. 0.1-"94-=4 0.4-'8,1 '0A 1 0,'1 'a1 'a� 02 0.3 '04 0.9 98 '04 '89 'D2 '02 '8A '07 'a6 '12 '19 '22 1 '03 'e4 '9.7 'Li 04 i:t t28»=0.4 I 'Os 08 01 '1.6 '1.9 '27 1 '0,4 '80 '1.6 'x.0 '2A '89 1 '8.0 '12 '1.4.S'2A `3.7 '$4 Its 1 '1.1 1.7 '32 'a@ i88 4 '4.0 '26 1 '21 '3.9 0.4 r '2,0 'G4 04 04 '22 84 '1.9 '12 '0A 'a7 'a3 '04 '0.4 '02 0.2 02 '02 '0, ;0.9 0.11 1, 1A .4 '26 '2A '2.2 '22 '23 '23 '2.1 '21 '23 '2% '2 1 Ai '72 4 '4,9: '3.8 '3i '211 '3,T R2 tat 199 I'14 { I "„at. 115, G93 32 84 4.1 6.T 183 7158{'1'7.1_' 1� �i{6.0 'o10 12.8 '00 'S0.4 14.1 '17,21143 '}9.6 11421'ae 'aAl `3.& 2.5 '3 't.r `$A 04 1x.9 f18SJlaai 14R3 'idA 9.4 '7. 149 '11m 07 e'A '6A 03 39 'a7 'a8 'aF 'SP 'T.7 'tiA "139 '12:3"""4:4"- 6.9 0.0 '04 '0.1 '0A 1.4.7 'OA 'A..0 '42 '0.4 '34 'ea '4$ '30 "504 '953 '189 '400 '0,6 '0.7 '&0 '0A '8.5 '6,4 '$4 '44 24t 194031.-.0 r-+}7-714. '2A 04 8.7 `4 +10(81�-403l0. '1a6 'SA '443 '42i4. '2e 'IA 'I. '224 '2.7 `29 'aR 2P '4 .1 'BA '26 29 �1. A `2.6 ' "0.0 '1.1 0.9 '9b 04t, 7.1 4.2" 4.9 4, 2A '3.0 '2.0 '23 0.7\1A 19\'62 'a0 30 `26 '22 k.13'1A, '14A~34.2 3b '3s '49 '2.3 '29 2 *1 'N.8 `13.9 "6,0 M1.0 '2.7 '2.6 "4984,7 2.1 0.3 '01 30 -0,0 '0A '20 '0.1 'O.S '0.1 bS�-j02`=GBT-«AYCAgR4t%-8b.""'P`41d'�',`ax'�A+{aa-3; 9. 0.3 a9 t0.3 ` a3+ O3C p,6 -`a8 0d .d '4.5 .03 r0A '04 'a.T 'p.7 0.7 I'/.0 t1,41 1,6( 'id 't,j 0.9 ' 1 0.8 a.0 jab t0.7 `491 0.0 'D, 'a,7 'r,T `a9 to :0.9 t0.3 t + bi 1A^ik - '0.4 "0.3 a 07 '23 '2.0 '2.7 '3A '3.2 '8.1 '28 '3.1 '2.9 '28 '2 0I 180 `tdc �t _ '6,1 00 "se `1t: 0.1 '0.1 04 '04 01.9 '0.0 '0A 06 '0.1 'at 'ai 'at '0.1 01 'a1 '0.1 '0.0 '0.0 `64 '00 '00 '0.0 O'i`^a,'r 0.T "Titi- O.i 0.9 0.1 0.1 '0.2'"'02 411 P.i 0,1 '0.1 --'0.1 '4li 4'02 '04 '¢3 '2.B '09,,,04 02340.4.�:0.t '3 :64^4 ti QA i 0d 6:.e 4�• a23_ 4 i.T 'i.d 'lA '1.4 '1.2 '12 '2.2 '2,p '20 '28 '2,4 23, ).L....2.@_ '2.0 '94..,.''0,4 '24,,,,2.9-228_ era ea '01 4A � .D i2P 1'.12 _3.0 f '4.61 '124 '8 ' 1 '7.8 't2A.i't9 '15 'i3% '10.4 6'fE 38 d.T 42 I'9.7 '40, '664 '110 i.t �Y.i '12.0 '183; '1 b '189 'i 7 '14.7 1l,4 '�.b 3 @ '2A 2.8 '331 '42 5A 142 `64A 1 %`ta2+'t4% 62{ '+ % '4 `4 '4J1 " $2 02 :'142 '16}j 42 y8.1 '4,4 ''S29' 'i22 '12b 124 24 '4.e 4.6 S.T {'27 '2s a '4,01 'ad '4q 617 '{0.5 34.7 fl19 I`11,9(1D.8 '12{ 6.2 5,9 'S$ G.5 IA f7A '101 'ta0" -r.2 0.7 '04 '8,9 0.3 08 'aa 'a0 7.2 '52 '60 '09 '6.7 '4A '68 '0.7 '41 '6A '0.5 '7.1 '64 6.5 '4.8 '0,1 '0.9 '0.4 'e4 'aa '717,7 14A '4.3 '6,3 `6.1 '4.0 '39 '4.0 '4.1 '6.7 '82 12.6 '42.0 '126 ±2.1 'a4 '6A '4.8 '00 '3.6 '9.8 '4,3 '6.4 '0.1 7.7 '52,6 '14.4 '144 '14.6 '120 '7,1 .424'0 12A `7,43' .Gtl-'s4A 3.1 S5 44 tab '16A 103 167 `j,2� 'AA d.b 92 27 34-5;�41's 'ae Ja2 '1a7 2t,.�$ '10A '8.6 f20 `i1'4 `d.2 .5 u9 +'2,2 ;'29 1 4,t '4./ 66 09 14e 'ifi.3 162 1441'0.7 :'8.7' 47,1 '4,f 4.8 4 'TA 124 a^g044*3414.7 `11A '00 'SA 32 :'33 +'+.B I 42 '4A `p.6 1 'i,$ RS ,0A I 08 ' 4.4 i '0.11 '43 '2 b 3,0 2A 4.1 1'4,1 + aA 'a3 '�.8i11�' F,T '79 `aP '42 \'27 0.0 '60 'e0 '4.8 '42 0.1 '4,1 '44 '3.7 4.0 3.6 '3,7 '3A '36 3.0 '2A '42 '49 2.8 '/.3 '0.7 '4,@ '82 'at 'e2 'et '4.0 "4,1 '3A`'2 '4A 0.1 '0,1 '7A 'TA 07 '8.1 '4.0 '39 '3A '2.0 22 '22 '22 '2.2 25 '3.3 '40 '0,7 '04 7.6 02 '0.0 '9A '90 '82 '0.7 '30 a t '461 '5.81 '9 j 019 1.8 0.9 11,0 ).9raA 00 '24 'ib 111 1,0 112 'S4 'OF 9 '4R 72b, 2.41 19 ± 1 '2.3 25 '2.4 '24 '23 '2.9 04 '1.8 9.7 001 04 0.0 '09 0.2 '1A '2.1 01 '2.2 '22 2.1 :22 ',9 0.7 '1,8 '1.7 '1.8 '12 0.9 '04 04 '0A 1,1 '1,4 '14 0,7 '1.9 '1.0 0.1 '0.1 '00 '0.0 '0A '00 '00 '00 0.0 '8A '417 01.0 '9.e 1 .. 624 0.1F ' 1 'O.tl 'tlA e a 0.9 'OA 00 00 0.0 'PA `02 '4.8 '0.B '0.3 'a2 'ai `0.1 0.4 'OA '0.9 '0.2 '80 '49 '0.0 00 '0.0 '041 '0A '00 'OP '00 A '1,4 '1.2 04 'Ob '02 '0.2 '0,1 0.1 8o 'at la '0.a 84 leo 'a0 'et '89 '0.6 o '4A 'be '0.B ".'ao"`"a:4"`bn"' 04"8A""'0A""' .4 '03 'at '84 0A 4k '0.0 '04 `0A 'e% 'ex Q0 '60 '0.4 09 0.0 '0.a 'D.2 '0.1 '0.1 '01 'DA '00. '¢D '00 '09 0,4 '0.0 '0.0 '00 00 OA 'aS 0.1 81 '¢$ 09 00 '00 '9.D a.4814i ,0 'a0 '00 '0.0 '40 '2.e 't.7 its "12 'id a0 '42 '0.1 '01 '0.a 'a4 '0,O '0A 'DA "a0 „QO 7 en '8A 'an 2.1 '1,8 '18 '12 '1A 'PA 0,4 'e3 0.1 '0.1 '0,1 '0.0 '8.6 '00. '1,7 '1A es 'as 'a2 '0.1 0.1 0.1 VA '4.4 '29 'RA 1,5 '0.11 'O7 '82 'D.2 '0.1 '04 '0.1 ,1 'Sfi '4.6 '2A '19 '00 05 'PA '03 '¢5 01 ,9 '28 '12 /=u;urz!'- BUILDING } ELECTRICAL SITE PH = 1'-'o" '4.3 1 '45 '1A '0.P 'at ,. '03 '02 a '1.1 07 '9.4 '4.4 '0A '8A "ex o0 '62 '02 let '08 •°Qa0 '0.0 '47 '2.4 '1.2 112 '14 '1.6 A&7 '2.5 '14 A '&t '1.7 '14 `1.21b4 1.2 1.8 '14 2 'tA '1.4 152 "1.kA j'tA rid '1.6 CCTV ETRIC PLAN a.. 00 '0.2 0. 2 '0.1 0,1 'e4 64 4 'a2 'a NORTH I hereby nerdy reel lhis plan, specifications or report wee prepared by ere or ender my aired 4upervlslon Banned 1834 i dully licensed Pmfe28ioeel Engineer under ere laws of Ole dale 1N Mlnneaola. scan Placer, P,E: Date: 05,12.11 Reg, NO.: 46412 464v, U419 A0844i7I46. Pmlec410. 04-11135 Drawn By: SIR Checked By: 05,12,11 199110 Dad: 05.12.11 Shut lice: ELECTRICAL SITE PHOTMETRIC PLAN E2.0 0401'0458144.cs,224''04,'13'.tA74'00Nidw'±rt'.' 1*pintuaunsafrv)$I',q,4„ffi4i>*;2.t34f5 4i0Nr1l:ZUi,'.'. "0 ALLUMW 114648 0ND C414.1.41210964602U1.0110140194174196vs4ie(Ai4TACSOR MORE CLW247011 11214 shee14 20PARKING 60' BUILDING SETBACX SETBACK eenfiwk, qz,maa,s1Aheitaitte, 0' BUILDING SETBACK 2 ' BUILDING SETBACK 20' P. iy• B. UTURE t POND • P.4 CATION 75' N.S.P. EASEMEN , 1' PARKING SETBACK POSSIBLE 20' P. r 12.049 'AGR ES V..- 4100)A1,11i4r FUTURE POND LOCATION 10 PtRKIN8 SETBAC rr•017PINF01.107qt„ • jj • HATA GROSS AREA LESS STREETS ONLY (PAVING) 3.6 AC+/- (imperv(ous swine) 26.7 AC +/- 110384 AC. 3.6 AC. 105.784 AC. POPE ASSOCIATES I N .0 SO' BUILDING ET5AC) GREEN AREAS ESTABLISHED 15.02 AC. ! BOULEVARD IN STREETS +1.0 AC. .4 - 17.62 C. B9.164 AC. X 25% = 22.29 AC. 4,---- + 17.52 AC. 511' LANDSCAPE 30,91 AC. : BUFFER 105.784 DIVIDE 39.91 = 37.4% GREEN AREA i LLJ GREEN SPACE ONLY LE/L. 75' NSP EASEMENT ' 2.26 AC 60' HERM 1.06 AC TRIBUTARY GREENWAY (26' either Mel 1,95 AC. MISC. AREA DI +1.26 AC 7,33 AC. PFIOPOSED rONO AREAS AURAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT ING CAPE +0.49 AC. 15.62 AC, NORTH SCALE 1"-100'-0" UNITED PROPERTIES 4 LAKE ELMO MINNESOTA 3 EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK IIP,IhdPIIIIlPPPIV I Pomona I . 11411,ei I 0 I 110 10 I. OtLISI AZOCIA.15 IA WHOM II i II 11,11 CAt.rrubSon No 753774182n Drown , CANT chinkNiby GFE pato 05/20/95 m o I SHEET 11 ,0111illi 4. IIIIIIII011.1b11.1110.1 1 1 01 i VI 11 Zdrbev-I nkr-T, I:4;Z e„,or>A 34' PAre.0,1( net • FIV.4.0449 61044., r ; ,!;':'"4.4,;,' -44 N.S.P. 1-A WI" 44 t ;•, ; • „ 44 fk,tY ..... L 14 t. 5 PROTOTYPICAL SECTION FIVE cue EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK Oa '474'44.'"1":' "re 45,414,0,1 61•P4, • Wh'/X A•41.47a/Nd_tY"' • IF..r1-coi pima pzezaexel4 fPwe tAVAAA,AIA' ;FA-141A, ; f A j •r 6 EAGLE POINT BUSINESS PARK 0. PROTOTYPICAL SECTION SIX CITY OF LAKE I ELMO MAYOR COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 6/21/2011 REGULAR ITEM 4; 7 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Downtown District Sidewalk Maintenance Project —Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Obtain Contractor Quotes SUBMITTED BY: Ryan Stempski, Assistant City Engineer THROUGH: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator i;3)* REVIEWED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director Mike Bouthilet, Public Works Superintendent SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing TKDA to prepare plans and specifications and obtain contractor quotes for the Downtown Sidewalk Maintenance Project. This effort is intended to identify the necessary scope of work and estimated construction costs to complete sidewalk safety and maintenance improvements along both sides of Lake Elmo Avenue from approximately the Union Pacific (UP) Railroad tracks to Trunk Highway 5 (see attached Location Map). Washington County has agreed to participate in this project through a 50u/0 cost participation of all project costs, including engineering. SUGGESTED MOTION: "Move to authorize TKDA to prepare plans and specifications and obtain contractor quotes for the Downtown District Sidewalk Maintenance Project in an amount not to exceed $6,400 with a reimbursement of 50% ($3,200) from Washington County." BACKGROUND INFORMATION AND STAFF REPORT: The Downtown District sidewalks along Lake Elmo Avenue are in need of improvement to mitigate several safety hazards, drainage corrections, and pavement distresses. Several sidewalk panels are uneven, which creates an unsafe tripping hazard for pedestrians. A few panels contain distresses that will require complete replacement. The sidewalk in front of 3476 Lake Elmo Avenue has shifted and now directs water to the basement of the building. -- page 1 -- City Council Meeting June 21, 2011 Downtown Distil Sidewalk Maintenance Project Authorize Plans & Specs and Obtain Quotes Agenda Item # 7 To address this maintenance need, the City and Washington County are proposing to partner on this project with the City leading the improvement project and the City and County sharing evenly in the project costs, If authorized to proceed, TKDA would perform a sidewalk condition assessment survey and prepare plans and specifications to address the various corrective activities for each sidewalk panel, including panel replacement (in a few instances), sand jacking to level out the panels, and crack sealing. Once the plans and specifications are completed, contractor quotes will be obtained and brought to the City Council for consideration to proceed with the improvements. The existing sidewalk just south of the UP Railroad tracks on the west side of Lake Elmo Avenue is in disrepair (shown in red on the attached Location Map). Removal and replacement with topsoil and sod is recommended for this entire section, but will be completed as a separate maintenance activity led by Washington County Public Works and assisted by Lake Elmo Public Works. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information and staff report, it is recommended that the City Council consider authorizing TKDA to prepare plans and specifications and obtain contractor quotes by undertaking the following suggested action: "Move to authorize TKDA to prepare plans and specifications and obtain contractor quotes for the Downtown District Sidewalk Maintenance Project in an amount not to exceed $6,400 with a reimbursement of 50"/o ($3,200) from Washington County." Alternatively, the City Cotmcil does have the authority to table this item for future consideration, or further discuss, deliberate and/or, if appropriate, amend the recommended motion prior to taking action. If the latter is done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to authorize TKDA to prepare plans and specifications and obtain contractor quotes for the Downtown District Sidewalk Maintenance Project in an amount not to exceed $6,400 with a reimbursement of 50% ($3,200) from Washington County." [and as amended and/or modified at tonight's meetingt," ATTACHMENTS: (1) Location Map SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of Item ...... ...... ...,......„ ....... ..... City Administrator - Report/Presentation „.................,.............,.. ....... ..,.... ............. City Engineer page 2 -- City Council Meeting Downtown Duth4Sidewalk Maintenance Project Authorize Plans & Specs and Obtain Quotes Agenda Item #7 ~Questions from Council koStaff ...................................... Public Input, if Appropriate.--......—.—....—...... Discussion...... ...................................... ................. ......... ActiononMotion .................... ...................................... — page 3— IAYOR& cOUNCI.4, CPMIVPNICATIQN DATE: 6/21/2011 REGULAR ITEM #: 8 MOTION Ordinance No: 08-046 AGENDA I I LM: Recruitment for/Appointments to Planning Commission: Ordinance Revision and Appointments SUBMITTED BY: Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Kyle Klatt, Planning Director REVIEWED BY: Bruce A. Messelt, City Administrator SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED,: Pursuant to previous City Council discussion, the City Council is respectfully requested to either consider Ordinance No. 08-046, reducing the Planning Commission to seven (7) voting members and two (2) alternate members or appoint the current two alternate members to vacant positions and direct City staff to solicit potential new alternate members for future Council consideration. The motions to undertake one of these actions is: MEMBERSHIP # "Move to Approve Ordinance No. 08-046, reducing the Composition MOTION: of the Planning Commission to seven (7) voting Members and (2) Alternates." - or - APPOINTMENT "Move to Appoint the following individuals to the Planning Commission: MOTION: - Nadine Obermueller fromist Alternate to Voting Member to complete a Vacant 2-year Term - Kathy Haggard from 2nd Alternate to Voting Member for a 3 year Term BACKGROUND INFORMATION & STAFF REPORT: Past practice has been when a vacancy occurs, the First Alternate is appointed to voting member (to complete an open term or begin a new full term) and the Second Alternate is appointed to First Alternate. The City then advertizes to fill the vacancies on the Planning Commission. -- page 1 -- City Council Meeting June 21st, 2011 Planning Com ission Appointments/Composition Regular Agenda Item # 8 Council direction in January 2011 was to prepare revisions to the enabling Ordinance and appointment practice for the Parks Commission to reduce the number of members by two (2). At that time, the City Council expressed interest in a similar effort on behalf of the Planning Commission, once the opportunity arrived. There currently exists two vacancies on the Planning Commission, with the two appointed Alternatives available to be appointed, as per past practice. Additional members would then have to be recruited to fill the then -vacant Alternate positions; an effort most recently undertaken last winter with only limited success. Alternatively, the City Council could consider at this time reducing the Planning Commission from nine (9) to seven (7) voting members and two (2) alternate members. City staff has prepared this alternative for Council consideration by drafting the proposed Ordinance. If undertaken, the following would be the composition of the Planning Commission: Todd Williams (finishing Mike Pearson's term) Jennifer Pelletier (1st Term) Robert Van Zandt (3rd term abbreviated — approved by City Council) Joan Ziertman (1st Term) Thomas Bidon (1st Term) Greg Hall (2nd Term) Nadine Obermueller (lst Alt) Kathy Haggard (2nd Alt) 12/31/2011 12/31/2012 12/31/2012 12-31/2012 12/31/2013 12/31/2013 No, (reappointed to 2nd term in Jan 2009; could not serve again consecutively as FVM, unless approved so by Council) Yes, (could serve two additional full 3- year terms) Yes No, (could not serve again consecutively as a FVM, unless approved so by Council) Yes Yes No, (could not serve again consecutively as a FVM, unless approved so by Council) RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to past City Council discussion, the City Council is respectfully requested to either consider Ordinance No. 08-046, reducing the Planning Commission to seven (7) voting members and two (2) alternate members or appoint the current two alternate members to vacant positions and direct City staff to solicit potential new alternate members for future Council consideration, The motions to undertake one of these actions is: "Move to Approve Ordinance No. 08-046, reducing the Composition of the Planning Commission to seven (7) voting Members and (2) Alternates." - or - -- page 2 -- City Council Meeting June 21st, 2011 Planning Commission Appointments/Composition Regular Agenda Item # 8 Wove to Appoint the following individuals to the Planning Commission: - XX from lst Alternate to Voting Member to complete a Vacant 2-year Tenn - XXfrom 2nd Afternate to Voting Member for a 3-year Term Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to modify or change the recommended Ordinance changes and appointments. If any changes are undertaken, the proposed motion would be as follows: 'Move to Approve Ordinance No. 08-046 and Appoint Members to the Planning Commission, as discussed and agreed to at tonight's meeting." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Proposed Ordinance No. 08-046 2. Section 32.025 -32.042 of Existing Code SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item Report/Presentation .......... ...... . .. Questions from Council to Staff Public Input, if Appropriate Call for Motion ....... ........ „ .. Discussion ... ...... ...... .......... ... Action on Motion City Administrator .......... . ..... ,....„. ..... Planning Director ....... .......... ....... Mayor Facilitates ....... . ..... ......„....,............, ...... Mayor Facilitates .......... ..... .......... ..,.,..Mayor & City Council ................. ........ ........ Mayor Facilitates ................ ........ ..... ........Mayor & City Council -- page 3 -- Ordii7ance 06-046 City Council,. 6/21/11 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-046 AN ORDINANCE TO REDUCE THE SIZE OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION FROM 9 VOTING MEMBERS TO 7 VOTING MEMBERS SEC !ION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title III: Administration; Chapter 32: City Organizations, by amending the following language: § 32.027 COMPOSITION. (A) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consist of 9-seven (7) voting members and two (2) non -voting alternate members. The voting members shall be appointed for a 3-year term so that only 1/3 of the appointments will expire on December 31 of each year. Voting members may not serve more than 2 consecutive terms. Appointment to an additional term(s) will be considered with the available applicant pool. Alternate members shall be appointed to serve until there is a vacancy on the Planning Commission, The City Council shall appoint a first alternate and a second alternate who shall become voting members in the order of their appointment upon a vacancy on the Commission. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title HI: Administration; Chapter 32: City Organizations, by amending the following language: § 32.035 QUORUM. A quorum shall consist of 5-four (4) members. SECTION 3. Effective Date This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City ofLake Elmo. SECTION 4. Adoption Date This Ordinance No. 08-046 was adopted on this 21st day of June, 2011, by a vote of Ayes and Nays, Ordinance 08-046 City C01.117Cii; 6/21/11 Mayor Dean Johnston ATTEST: Bruce Messelt City Administrator This Ordinance No 08-046 was published on the day of 2011. Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances PLANNING COMMISSION § 32.025 ESTABLISHMENT. A Planning Commission is continued in the city. (1997 Code, § 210.01) § 32.026 PURPOSE. The Planning Commission is established to meet the requirements of state statute; to develop and enforce the Comprehensive Plan and amendments to the plan, subject to Council approval and the requirements of the Municipal Planning Act; and to review and make recommendations on subdivisions, zoning applications, planned unit developments, and site and building plans as provided by ordinance. No expenditures by the Commission shall be made unless and until authorized for the purpose by the Council. (1997 Code, § 210.02) § 32.027 COMPOSITION. (A) Generally. The Planning Commission shall consist of 9 voting members and 2 non -voting alternate members. The voting members shall be appointed for a 3-year term so that only 1/3 of the appointments will expire on December 31 of each year. Voting members may not serve more than 2 consecutive terms. Appointment to an additional term(s) will be considered with the available applicant pool. Alternate members shall be appointed to serve until there is a vacancy on the Planning Commission, The City Council shall appoint a first alternate and a second alternate who shall become voting members in the order of their appointment upon a vacancy on the Conunission. (1997 Code, § 210.03) (Am. Ord, 97-96, passed 1-15-2002; Ain. Ord. 97-147, passed 2-15-2005; Am. Ord. 97-200, passed 11-5-2007) (B) Special appointments. (1) At the discretion of the City Council, up to 5 additional appointments can be made to the Planning Commission, for each special project, including but not limited to American Legal Publishing Corp. Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances Environmental Management, Maintenance Advisory, and the Old Village, to assist with special projects currently in process, or directed by the City Council to be studied, drafted, and completed, (2) The term of the special appointments shall expire 2 years from the date of appointment, or upon completion of the special project, whichever is first. Any special appointee may request reappointment if the specific project is not completed in that time, (3) (a) Special project appointees shall have full voting privileges only on issues specifically related to the special project. (b) Full voting privileges for the regular Planning Commission shall remain consistent with this section. (Ord. 97-67, passed 1-2-2001; Am. Ord. 97-70, passed 1-16-2001) § 32.028 QUALIFICATIONS. Each member and alternate member shall be a resident of the city. Wherever possible, Commission members should represent all geographical areas of the city and a cross-section of the population of the city at the time of appointment. (1997 Code, § 210.04) § 32.029 REMOVAL. Any member or alternate member may be removed by a 4/5 vote of the Council, for cause. Cause shall include but not be limited to having more than 3 consecutive absences or being absent from more than 1/3 of the meetings in any 1 calendar year. The Council may consider exceptional circumstances when applying this rule. (1997 Code, § 210.05) § 32.030 OFFICERS. The Commission shall elect a Chairperson, a Vice Chairperson, and a Secretary from among its appointed members at the annual meeting each year, for a term of 1 year. The Chairperson shall preside at all meetings of the Commission, if present, and shall perform all other duties and functions required by state statute or assigned by the Commission or the American Legal Publishing Corp. 2 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances Council. The Vice Chairperson shall perform these duties in the absence of the Chairperson. If a vacancy occurs in the Chairperson's office, the Vice Chairperson shall assume the Chairperson's duties for the remainder of the year, and a new Vice Chairperson shall be elected by the Commission at a special election to be held at the next regularly scheduled Commission meeting, after at least 2-days written notice to each Commission member. The Secretary shall perform those duties assigned by state statute only. A recording Secretary shall be appointed by the Council to take and keep the minutes and records of the Commission. (1997 Code, § 210.06) § 32.031 ANNUAL MEETINGS. (A) The Commission shall hold an annual meeting the second Monday in the month of January in each year. (B) The meeting shall be devoted to the election of officers and other business as shall be scheduled. (1997 Code, § 210.07) § 32.032 ANNUAL WORK PLAN. The Planning Commission shall meet with the Council at the Commission's first meeting in September each year to develop an annual work plan, including a list of projects, points of interaction on projects, programs, and goals for the following year. (1997 Code, § 210.08) § 32.033 REGULAR MEETINGS. Regular meetings shall be held in the City Hall at 7:00 p.m. on the second and fourth Mondays of each month. No action shall be taken in the absence of a quorum except to adjourn the meeting to a subsequent date. A regular meeting may be canceled or rescheduled by the Commission at a prior meeting or if there are no scheduled agenda items on the Thursday prior to the meeting. All action taken by the Commission shall be by the affirmative vote of a majority of the members present. (1997 Code, § 210.09) American Legal Publishing Corp. Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances § 32.034 SPECIAL MEETINGS. Special meetings of the Commission shall be held in the City Hall at a time and place designated or at a public place at a time designated and shall be called by the Chairperson, Upon the written request of at least 4 members, the Chairperson shall be required to call a special meeting to be held within 7 days of the request. Written notice of the meeting shall be given to all members not less than 3 working days in advance of the meeting. (1997 Code, § 210.10) § 32.035 QUORUM. A quorum shall consist of 5 members. (1997 Code, § 210.11) (Am. Ord. 97-14, passed 9-2-1997) § 32.036 VOTING. Each member attending any meeting shall be entitled to cast 1 vote, Voting shall be by voice vote. If any member has a personal interest of any kind in the matter before the Commission, the member shall disclose the interest and be disqualified from voting upon the matter. The Secretary shall record in the minutes that no vote was cast by that member. Alternate members shall be entitled to cast 1 vote in the absence of any member, The second alternate shall be entitled to cast 1 vote in the absence of any 2 members. (1997 Code, § 210.12) § 32.037 PROCEEDINGS, At any regular meeting of the Commission, the following shall be the regular order of business: (A) Roll call; (B) Approval of agenda; (C) Minutes of the preceding meeting; American Legal Publishing Corp. 4 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances (D) Public hearings as scheduled on the agenda; (E) Old and new business as scheduled on the agenda; (F) Communications; (G) Other; and (H) Adjournment. (1997 Code, § 210.13) § 32.038 RULES OF PROCEDURE. All meetings of the Commission shall be conducted in accordance with the Revised Robert's Rules of Order. (1997 Code, § 210.14) § 32.039 AGENDA. The Chairperson shall cause all items to be considered at any meeting to be placed on a written agenda by the City Administrator or an appointed designee. The City Administrator, or appointed designee, shall advise the Chairperson of any matters the Commission must consider by Council directive, ordinance, or statute and shall have prepared and supply a written agenda of all meetings to all Commission members, the Council, and the public no less than 4 days before each meeting. (1997 Code, § 210.15) § 32.040 RECORDS. Each formal action of the Commission shall be embodied in full upon the minute book as formal motion or resolution. The minutes of each meeting shall be provided to each member, the Council, and the public no more than 7 days after the date of each meeting. The recommendations and findings of the Commission shall be presented to the Council at the next regularly scheduled Council meeting. The records of meetings and actions and recommendations shall be transmitted to the City Administrator, or appointed designee, for keeping and distribution. American Legal Publishing Corp. 5 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances (1997 Code, § 210.16) § 32.041 TRAINING. Commission members shall be encouraged to avail themselves of training courses offered by the city, the state, and other government and public training agencies and the Council shall budget for the reimbursement of expenses incurred in training each year. (1997 Code, § 210.17) § 32.042 DUTIES AND POWERS OF THE COMMISSION; COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. (A) Plan, The Planning Commission shall have the powers and duties given city planning agencies generally by law. The Commission shall also exercise the duties conferred upon it by this code. It shall be the purpose of the Planning Commission to prepare and adopt a Comprehensive Plan for the physical development of the city, including proposed public buildings, street arrangements and improvements, efficient design of major thoroughfares for moving of traffic, parking facilities, public utilities services, parks and playgrounds, a general land use plan, and other matters relating to the physical development of the city. The plan may be prepared in sections, each of which shall relate to the Comprehensive Plan program. After the Commission has prepared and adopted the Comprehensive Plan, it shall periodically, but at least every 5 years, review the Comprehensive Plan and any ordinances or program implementing the plan. (B) Means of executing plan. Upon the adoption of a Comprehensive Plan or any section, it shall be the concern of the Planning Commission to recommend to the Cotmcil reasonable and practicable means for putting into effect the plan or section in order that the same will serve as a pattern and guide for the orderly physical development of the city and as a basis for judging the timely disbursements of funds to implement the objective. Means of effectuating the plan shall, among other things, consist of a zoning ordinance, subdivision regulations, capital improvement programming and technical review, and recommendations of matters referred to the Planning Commission by the Council. (C) Zoning ordinance. The Planning Commission shall review all proposed amendments to the zoning ordinance, take part in public hearings, and make recommendations to the Council as may be prescribed by the zoning ordinance. (D) Conditional use permits. (1) The Planning Commission may make recommendations on all requests for American Legal Publishing Corp. 6 Lake Elmo, MN Code of Ordinances a conditional use permit under the terms of the zoning ordinance. (2) The Commission shall report its recommendations to the Council for action. (E) Subdivisions, The Planning Commission may make recommendations in relation to the subdividing of land as prescribed by the ordinance; the Commission shall report its recommendations to the Council for action. (F) Variances. The Planning Commission shall hear all variance requests from the literal provisions of this code, and shall follow the guidelines set forth in the zoning code. (G) Capital Improvement Program. (1) (a) The Planning Commission shall endeavor to obtain from city officers a descriptive list of proposed improvements for the ensuing 5-year period. (b) The Planning Commission shall also request from the local school district a similar list of its proposed public works. (2) (a) The Planning Commission shall list and classify all the proposed public works and shall prepare a coordinated program of proposed public works for the ensuing year and for a projected 5-year period. (b) The program shall be recommended by the Planning Commission to the Council and to the other officers, departments, boards, or public bodies as have jurisdiction over the recommended planning or construction of the public works. (1997 Code, § 210.18) American Legal Publishing Corp. 7 CITY OF LAKE ELMO AYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 6/21/11 REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Southern Lake Elmo — Process, Goals and Vision. Review of draft policy document concerning the vision and goals for the 1-94 planning committee SUBMITTED BY: Kelli Matzek, Planner THROUGH: Bruce Messelt, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is asked to review a drafted Vision Statement and Goals for the Southern Lake Elmo area. Moving forward, Staff expects to utilize the Vision Statement and accompanying goals in planning for this dynamic area. However, there is an expectation that the goals under the subheading "Land Use Goals" will need to be revisited as it is further discussed what type of land uses would be best suited in this area. Additionally, Staff will provide the City Council with a brief update on the meetings and progress held to -date. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: A majority of this area (south of 10th Street) of the City is guided for future sewered development — both residential and non-residential. The City Council has authorized Staff to move forward with a public process to revisit the future land uses in the area south of 10th Street and to ultimately update Lake Elmo's Comprehensive Plan. As a part of this process, a Vision Statement and set of Goals has been crafted for the City Council to review and comment on. V May 9, 2011 — Work Group Mtg. — Drafted Vision Statement and Goals ✓ May 18, 2011 — 2nd Stakeholder Group Mtg. — Reviewed/commented on Draft Vision Statement and Goals ✓ June 13, 2011 — Planning Commission Mtg. — Reviewed/commented on Draft Vision Statement and Goals ✓ June 20, 2011 — Park Commission Mtg. — Will review and comment on the Draft Vision Statement and Goals -- page I -- City Council Meeting Southern Lake Elmo; D ted Vision Statement and Goals 6-21-11 Regular Agenda Item # 6 The comments received have been recorded or, in the case of the Park Commission, will be verbally communicated during the City Council meeting, The suggested text changes by the Planning Commission have been incorporated. RECOMMENDATION: No formal motion is needed at this time. However, Staff is interested in having the City Council provide preliminary feedback on the Vision Statement and Goals. ATTACHMENTS: L Drafted Vision Statement and Goals 2. Comments and Questions Received SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ...................... ............ . ..... ..... ...........,.... City Administrator City Planner Mayor Facilitates Mayor Facilitates Report/Presentation Questions from Council to Staff Public Input, if Appropriate Discussion .......... .......... ............. ....... ....,..........„„ ...... Mayor & City Council -- page 2 -- DRAFT DRAFT VISION STATEMENT AND GOALS FOR SOUTH OF 10TH STREET AREA Transportation Goals: 1, Encourage safe, efficient and environmentally sound transportation including the extension of public transit to the area south of 10th Street. 2, Make it easy and convenient to travel in and around the area south of 10th Street. 3. Tie new development to the capacity of roadways and limit the impact of non residential traffic in neighborhoods when possible. 4. Develop a comprehensive sidewalk, trail and bikeway system that provides an integrated system of roads, bikeways and pedestrian paths. The transportation system should minimize the impact of through traffic. Housing Goals: 1. Provide a quality living environment for the residents of Lake Elmo. 2. Provide a balanced choice of housing types and densities suitable to a wide range of demographic groups, with a focus on life cycle housing. Where possible, distribute different housing types throughout the area south of 10th Street. 3. Meet the Metropolitan Counci1s requirements for residential RECs. Draft Vision Statement, Goals; Southern Lake Elmo DRAFT Environmental and Sustainability Goals,. 1. Create a natural resource open space system that preserves, protects, or restores environmental resources within the city. 2. Use the natural resource open space system to connect open spaces, parks, activity centers and neighborhoods. 3. Protect and enhance Lake Rose, Kramer Lake and Goose Lake as a natural open space system and passive recreation resource. 4. Encourage environmentally responsible building and operation practices. Land Use Goals: 1. Utilize the future land use map as the overall land use policy statement by designating residential, commercial, public facilities and parks and open space lands appropriately located with adequate access and buffering from adjacent uses. 2. Create new, interesting, quality -designed neighborhoods that relate to their natural settings and surrounding developed areas, that protect natural resources, and that provide central parks and open spaces that are interconnected by trails to neighborhood community destinations. 3. EncOura2e businesses and housing in the area south of 10th Street to be complementary to those of the Village Area's downtown. Draft Vision Statement, Goals; Southern Lake Elmo DRAFT Economic Development Goals: 1. Increase the tax base and provide opportunities for economic growth for Lake Elmo and Lake Elmo area residents. 2. Be cognizant that businesses in the area 3. Encourage new locations for job growth in close proximity to housing and with convenient access while maintaining reasonable buffers between residential and non-residential uses. 4. Meet the Metropolitan Council requirements for non-residential RECs. Recreation Goals: 1. Provide a variety of passive and active parks and other leisure, recreational and cultural opportunities that are conveniently located, accessible, affordable, safe, physically attractive and uncrowded for all Lake Elmo residents. 2. Connect city parks to each other and to prominent destinations within and outside of the city through a system of trails. 3. Look for creative opportunities for residents to utilize the lakes such as through non -motorized lakeshore trails. General Character Goals: 1. To integrate, where possible, unique characteristics of rural Lake Elmo such as a strong sense of community with an emphasis on access to active and passive open space, 2. To develop design guidelines which will provide creative rural style architecture consistent with Lake Elmo's rural heritage. Draft Vision Statement, Goals; Southern Lake Elmo DRAFT Vision Statement: The area south of 10th Street shall be known for safe, walkable and diverse neighborhoods with a variety of development patterns that include with convenient access to parks, trails and open space. Lake Elmo will encourage a thriving business community that is as much an integral part of the city as the residential neighborhoods. The communities created, both residential and non-residential, will demonstrate sustainability through preservation of natural resources and responsible environmental stewardship. This area of Lake Elmo will continue to build upon and Promote the character of Lake Elmo. Draft Vision Statement, Goals; Southern Lake Elmo Draft Vision Statement and Goals for Southern Lake Elmo (N of I-94, S of lOth Street) Vision Statement: The area south of loth Street shall be known for safe, walkable and diverse neighborhoods with convenient access to parks, trails and open space. Lake Elmo will encourage a thriving business community that is as much an integral part of the city as the residential neighborhoods. The communities created, both residential and non-residential, will demonstrate sustainability through preservation of natural resources and responsible environmental steward Conunen 4 mtg.), at does "diverse om Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 ea n? is io mention of transportation other than pede an (walking). of "ishe difference between "preservation of natural resoces" and "responsible environmental ardship" Suggested ending the sentence at o rces." iked ihethriving business" portion Suggested adding "recognizing market need"; one iked the verbage as is Transportation Goals: 1. Encourage safe, efficient and environmentally sound transportation including the extension of public transit to the area south of 10th Street. 2. Make it easy and convenient to travel in and around the area south of 10th Street. •••, 3. Tie new development to the capacity of roadways, and limit the impact of non residential traffic in neighborhoods when possible. 4. Develop a comprehensive sidewa a bikeway system that provides an rnthgrated system of roads, bikeways and pedestrian paths The. transportation system should rninlmize the impact o through traffic. Comments ReceiVed om Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 mtg): Will sidiibe required everywhere? The city does not currently haveniany sidewalks. - Is thd6,ctirrentlia"'Sid7alk plan? g,4. • 2 Housing Goals: Comments Reeeivedfrom Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 mtg.): 1. Provide a quality living environment for the residents - None. ..„. of Lake Elmo. 2. Provide a balanced choice of housing types and densities suitable to a wide range of demographic groups, with a focus on life cycle housing. Where possible, distribute different housing types throughout the area south of 10th Street. 3. Meet the Metropolitan Council's requirements fo residential RECs. • Environmental and Sustainabili Goals: I. Create a natural resource open space system that preserves, protects, or restores environmental resources within the city. 2. Use the natural resource open space system to connect open spaces, parks, activity centers and neighborhoods. Comments Received from Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 mtg): - Who will crgate a natural resource system inventory? - Suggestedz6ddin "while respecting the rights of property 3. Protect and enhance Lake Rose, Kramer Lake and Goose Lake as a natural open space system and passive :- recreation resource. 4. Encourage environmentally respon operation practices. 4 Land Use Goals: Comments Receivedfrom Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 mtg.): 1. Utilize the future land use map as the overall land use - None. policy statement by designating residential, commercial and parks and open space lands appropriately located with adequate access and buffering from adjacent uses. 2. Create new, interesting, quality -designed neighborhoods that relate to their natural settings and surrounding developed areas, that protect natural resources, and that provide central parks and open - spaces that are interconnected by trails to neighborhood community destinations. 5 Economic Development Goals: 1. Increase the tax base and provide opportunities for economic growth for Lake Elmo and Lake Elmo area residents. 2. Be cognizant that businesses in the area south of lOth Street are complementary to those of the Village Area's downtown. 3. Encourage new locations for job growth in close4.:., proximity to housing and with convenient access whi maintaining reasonable buffers between residential and non-residential uses. 4. Meet the Metropolitan Council' s require ents for non-residential RECs. Cominents Received from Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 Intg): - "Cognizant" jSn't a goal - Using the*oct"complimentary is confusing - The market will dictate what businesses should go where - Other markets, such as Woodbury already compete and Will,:compete with the fulire'rion-residential Busihsses are supposed to compete with each other. - Suggestediremoving the second goal. ::Suggested iiktri'"enhancing" instead of "cea'letinettAry in second goal. 6 Recreation Goals: Comments Received from Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 171 tg): 1. Provide a variety of passive and active parks and other leisure, recreational and cultural opportunities that are conveniently located, accessible, affordable, safe, physically attractive and uncrowded for all Lake Elmo residents. 2. Connect city parks to each other and to prominent destinations within and outside of the city through a system of trails. General Character Goals: omments Receivedfrom Stakeholder Group (5-18-11 thtg): 1. To integrate, where possible, unique c araete-riStics„,„ 5.Can we expect this area to feel like Lake Elmo? of rural Lake Elmo such as a string sense of tonmrnnity with an emphasis on access to active and,passi*ppeti space. * '''.•;:j:•:::.:-.., .... . . .:'.......:.'!:, .. ,... ., - Suggested using "promote" instead of "integrate" - Suggested "Where possible integrate" - Can see architectural design being rural in nature to an extent - Development needs to show a respect to the open space 7