Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout04-05-2005 CCMPMayor: Dean Johnston Council members: Rita Conlin Steve DeLapp Liz Johnson Anne Smith Please read: 3800 Laverne Avenue No. Lake Elmo, MN 55042 777-5510 777-9615 (fax) Since the City Council does not have time to discuss every point presented, it may appear that decisions are preconceived. However, staff provides background information to the City Council on each agenda item in advance; and decisions are based on this information and experience. In addition, some items may have been discussed at previous council meetings. If you are aware of information that has not been discussed, please fill out a "Request to Appear Before the City Council form; or, if you came late, raise your hand to be recoanized. Comments that are pertinent are appreciated. Items may be continued to a future meeting if additional time is needed before a decision can be made. City Counci Agenda eeting Convenes Pledge of Allegiance 1. Agenda 2. Minutes: 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFO ATIONAL: A. PUBLIC HQ * ES: B. PUBLIC INFO* TIONAL: (1) Arbor Day Proclamation (2) Planning Commission Appointment (3) Announce Board of Review 4. CONSENT AGENDA A. Resolution No. 2005-034:Approving Claims 5. FINANCE A. 6. NEW BUSINESS 7. 1VIAINTENANCE/P IRE/BUILDING: A. Update on Fire Department Activities:Fire Chief 7:00 P March 15, 2005 Public Inquiries/Informational is an opportunity for citizens to bring the Council's attention any items not currently on the agenda. In addressing the Council, please state your name and address for the record, and a brief summary of the specific item being addressed to the Council. To allow adequate time for each person wishing to address the Council, we ask that individuals limit their comments to three (3) minutes. Written documents may be distributed to the Council prior to the meeting or as bench copies, to allow a more timely presentation. Those items listed under the Consent Calendar are considered to be routine by the City Council and will be enacted by one motion under a Consent Calendar format. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Council member so requests, in which event, the item will be removed from the general order of business and considered separately in its normal sequence on the agenda. 4 Lake Elmo City Council Agenda April 5, 2005 Page 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Water Tower Storage Tank, CUP B. PW/Parks Facility, CUP and Variance C. Resolution No. 2005- : Award Bid for Phase I Water System Interconnect 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Preliminary Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Conditional Use Permit and OP Concept Plan -Deer Glen (continuation) B. OP Concept Plan - Farms of Lake Elmo C. Minor Subdivision:Olinger, , 9057 Lake Jaue Trail D. Section 520 Site Plan — 11051 Stillwater Blvd. E. Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment - Home Occupation in Rural Residential Zoning F. CDBG — Award Contract for Cimarron Gas Service Replacements G. Update on Comprehensive Plan (verbal) 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. 11. CITY IMINIST A. TOR'S REPORT: 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: A. Mayor Johnston B. Council Member Conlin C. Council Member DeLapp D. Council Member Johnson E. Council Member Smith TREE SEMINARS: Buckthorn: April 7, 7 p.m. Oak Wilt/Dutch Elm Disease: April 21, 7 p.m. Tom Prey,' C. Dillerud BOARD OF REVIEW: May 4, 4-6 o.m. CLEAN UP DAY: May 21st, 8-Noon LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: MARCH 1, 2005 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. St. Croix Valley Community Family Center:Select representative to guidance committee and authorize $2,000 donation:Resolution No. 2005- 024 B. Appointment to Community Improvement Commission 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-021:Approving Claims B. Authorization for Professional Services:GIS Mapping of the Surface Water System and Sanitary Sewer System C. Authorization for Professional Services: Construction Details and Engineering Design Standard Update D. Next Genesis Contract (1) Website Redesign (2) DSL Service (3) Monthly Maintenance Service E. Resolution No. 2005-022:Worker's Compensation F. Ordinance 97-150:Relating, to Waiving Water Surface Use Regulations 5. FINANCE: A. Monthly Operating Report 6. NEW BUSINESS: A. Ordinance No. 97-151:Relating to Dogs (Adoption postponed) B. Appointments to Regional Park Comprehensive Planning Committee 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING: A. Update on Building Department Activities: Jim McNamara CITY ENGNIEER'S REPORT A. Ordinance No. 97-152:Installation of Stop Sign at the Intersection of Highlands Trail and Hilltop Avenue 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Preliminary Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment Rezoning, Conditional Use permit and OP Concept Plan — Deer Glen:Resolution No. 2005-027 through Resolution No. 2005-032 B. Minor Subdivision/Site Plan and Zoning Variance, Amendment to the Development Moratorium, Public Hearing:Vacation of drainage easements — Lynsky (Brookman 3rd Addition),Resolution No. 2005-025, Resolution No. 2005-026,Ordinance No. 97-153 C. Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Section 520 Site plan — City of Lake Elmo D. Fields of St. Croix II/Little Blue Stem — Developer Improvements E. Resolution No. 2005-023:Capital Improvements Program Amendment — Street Improvements LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. Sunfish Lake Park Legal 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor Johnston called the Council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers: PRESENT: Johnston, Conlin, Smith, Johnson, DeLapp, City Engineer Prew, Planner Dillerud, Building Official Jim McNamara, City Attorney Filla, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet and Administrator Rafferty 1. AGENDA M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to approve the March 15, 2005 City Council agenda, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). 2. MINUTES: MARCH 1, 2005 M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve the March 1, 2005 City Council minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). . PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. St. Croix Valley Community Family center:Select representative to g uidance committee and authorize $2.000 donation:Resolution No. 2005- 024 The Partners of the St. Croix Valley Area Community Family Center are requesting the support of a one-time financial contribution for the Project Coordinator position and would like to have a volunteer to serve on the guiding team. Mayor Johnston said he would volunteer to serve on the team and bring information back to the city in a timely manner. M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-024, A Resolution by the Partners of the St. Croix Valley Area Community Family Center Supporting a one-time Financial Contribution of $2,000 for the Position of a Project Coordinator and name Mayor Johnston to serve on the guiding team. (Motion passed 4-1:DeLapp:The city has a past record of dealing with such requests by placing donation requests on the website. Money is not in our budget.) B. Appointment to Community Improvement Commission The Community Improvement Commission consists of seven members. If Deborah Lyzengas's resigns because of her appointment to the Planning Commission, this will create two vacancies on the Community Improvement Commission. The City has received an application form Gloria Knoblauch. M/S/P Smith/Conlin - to appoint Gloria Knoblauch to the Community Improvement Commission. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 2 4, CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-021:Approving, Claims M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-021, approving claim numbers 245, 246, 247, DD363 through DD372, 26999 through 27005, which were used for staff payroll dated March 3, 2005,claims 27006 through 27059, in the total amount of S68,659.52. (Motion passed 5-0). B. Authorization for Professional Services:GIS Mapping of the Surface Water Svstem and Sanitary Sewer System, M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to approve the authorization for Professional Services from TKDA for the GIS Mapping of the Surface Water System and Sanitary Sewer System in the amount of $32,000. (Motion passed 5-0). C. Authorization for Professional Services: Construction Details and Engineering, Design Standard Update M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to approve authorization for Professional Services from TKDA for the Construction Details and Engineering Design Standard Update in the amount of $5,000. (Motion passed 5-0). D. Next Genesis Contract (1) Website Redesign The Finance Director reported that the city's current website was designed as a start-up program for the purpose of disseminating information to the residents. Next Genesis has provided a proposal in the amount of $12,380.63 that entails the complete redesign and requires little time from staff The primary goal is to make the site more "user friendly" and to improve the overall appearance. The Council Finance Conunittee reviewed this proposal and recommended approval of the web -site redesign. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to approve the Next Genesis proposal for web -site redesign in the amount of $12,380.63 per the recommendation of the Council Finance Committee. (Motion passed 5-0). (2) DSL Service The Finance Director reported the city receives its existing internet service through Comcast Cable Company at no charge, but the city is continually interrupted in accessing the internet due to Comcast frequent changes to the Internet Protocol (IP) address. Next Genesis has submitted a proposal to provide DSL service at a $253.88 start-up cost and $90 per month thereafter. The Council Finance Committee reviewed this proposal and recommended approval of this service. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to approve the Next Genesis proposal for DSL service in the amount of a $253.88 start-up cost and $90 per month thereafter per the recommendation of the Council Finance Committee. (Motion passed 5-0) (3) Monthly Maintenance Service The Finance Director reported in 2004 the cost for Management Information Systems (MIS) support services cost the city approximately $1080.00/month. Next Genesis has submitted a proposal for monthly support services for $900/month which will enable the city to lock into a constant rate for at least a year and will assist in calculating expenses in future budgets. The Council Finance Committee has reviewed this proposal and has recommended approval. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to approve the Next Genesis Proposal for Monthly Maintenance Services in the amount of $900.00/month per the recommendation of the Council Finance Committee. (Motion passed 5-0). E. Resolution No. 2005-022:Worker's Compensation The Finance Director reported that Minnesota Statute 176.011 subd 9, (5) provides that "municipal officers elected or appointed for a regular term of office" are considered to be "employees" for workers' compensation purposes only if the city has passed a resolution to that effect. This would provide coverage for elected officials injured while performing his or her duties. The total premium for all elected officials in 2005 will be $71.00. MIS/P Johnson/DeLapp - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-022 regarding workers' compensation coverage for all elected officials at a cost of $71.00 for all elected officials in 2005. (Motion passed 5-0). F. Ordinance 97-150:Relating to Waiving Water Surface Use Regulations At the March 1 s' meeting. Joe Kiesling, Tri lakes Association, requested Council approval of a Water Surface Use Permit for the Annual Water Ski Show on Lake Jane. Mr. Kiesling also requested a waiver from the Water Surface Use Regulations for this event. Attorney Filla advised that the municipal code would have to be amended in order for the City to permit a temporary suspension of the rules. A draft Ordinance waiving the Water Surface Use regulations by authorizing a special permit was submitted for Council approval. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to adopt Ordinance No. 97-150, An Ordinance Relating to Water Surface Use Regulations of the Municipal Code. (Motion passed 5-0). 5. FINANCE: A. Monthly Operating Report INFORMATIONAL The Finance Director reported the City is on -track with all of our expenditures. 6. NEW BUSINESS: LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 4 A. Ordinance No. 97-151:Relatint.f. to Does At the Public Health and Safety Council Committee, the committee recommended the modifications to the animal control ordinance prepared by the Community Improvement Commission. This issue has been studied by the CIC for a number of months, has gone to Council for action and referred back to the PH&S Committee for final review. In the proposed ordinance; if any owner is not at home a dog may not be secured by an invisible fence. Lake Elmo resident Jeanette Behr pointed out that the consequences for dogs that are found loose are already established in the ordinance. If you leave home with your dog in the invisible fence, you have already violated the proposed ordinance. Ms. Behr noted that the ordinance needs to be fine tuned because it does not give enough definition of owner at home and places the animal control officer in an uncomfortable and difficult situation. She suggested that "invisible fencing" be changed to "underground pet containment system" because invisible fencing is a trademark. Ms. Behr volunteered to assist in amending the ordinance. Lake Elmo resident Linda Wagner said she has had an invisible fence since 1994 so will these fences be grandfathered in. She asked if this was a city-wide issue. If the dog is at large, cite the dog as at large and use the 3 strike rule. Mayor Johnston responded that the Council discussed the 3-strike system and it became too complicated to work with. Council member Johnson didn't think the amendment was warranted based on the ACO report that only four dogs wearing the collars picked up both in 2003 and 2004. Johnson said if a dog is at large, it's at large and we have a system in place to handle that. Both Johnson and Lake Elmo resident Bret Emmons indicated the ordinance was penalizing individuals using an underground system and who have done good work in following through with training. Council member Smith said the Animal Control Officer lives 25 miles away and doesn't always get here in time to see the dog out. Council member Johnson responded that if the problem is response time may be we should look at who we are using for animal control. Attorney Filla agreed that the amendment lacked clear language as to the definition of owner at home and as to enforcement. M/S/P Smith/Johnston - to table Ordinance No. 97-151, An Ordinance Relating to Confinement of Dogs for clarification by staff for the definition of owner at home, enforcement if an animal is not properly confined and change the name of invisible fencing to underground pet containment system and bring this ordinance back to the council committee for review. (Motion passed 5-0). Council member DeLapp suggested, once the ordinance has been adopted, request the Animal Control Officer report back in a year on how effective this ordinance. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 B. Appointments to Regional Park Comprehensive Planning Committee Jim Lugar, Director for the Regional Park, met with the city administrator to discuss the need to develop a new comprehensive plan for the park. He asked that the City appoint two committee representatives so the City's interest would be represented. Three individuals agreed to participate should the Council decide to select them for this purpose, Sue Dunn, Margaret Carlson and Bob Schumacher. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to appoint Margaret Carlson and Bob Schumacher, with Susan Dunn as backup as committee representatives to the Regional Park Comprehensive Planning Committee. (Motion passed 5-0). 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUILDING: A. Update on Building Department Activities: Ji McNamara The Building Official reported there were no residential:c °commercl`building permits issued in the month of February. He will be attending radon seminar 00ented by the State of MN next week. 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT A. Ordinance No. 97-152:Installation:of Stop Sign at the Intersection of Highlands Trail and Hilltop Menf><»`>:;__> The City Engineer and Public Wor's>_Supervisrreviewed the request for a stop sign on west bound Highland Trail at Hilltop Avenue. They recommended a stop sign be installed due to the limited sight distaee`due to surrounding landscaping and the topography. At the March 8th oiinczl" Committee workshop, the Council asked staff to invite surrounding property owners for their input. Mike Moss said <lewas not opposed to the stop sign, but caution neighbors it could be creating more of a` hazard because it is a false sense of safety for children. He has seen drivers, who are residents, drivdown the hill very fast. Maybe it should be a 3-way stop and install speed bumps: <` Dave Bendel said he petitioned for the stop sign for safety reasons. He has three children and worries about their safety because he himself has been close to getting hit at least six times. Council member Johnson raised her concern on accountability and enforceability of a stop sign. M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to adopt Ordinance No. 97-152, Approving Installation of a Stop Sign at the Intersection of Highlands Trail and Hilltop Avenue. (Motion passed 5-0) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 6 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Preliminary Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezoning, Conditional Use permit and OP Concept Plan — Deer Glen:Resolution No. 2005-027 — Resolution No. 2005-033 (Adoption of Resolutions Postponed) The City Planner reported the Planning Commission adopted a recommendation to deny all of the subject multiple applications for the platting of 108 acres, an Op Concept Plan covering 40+ acres; a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (from RAD to PF) for 20 acres; and rezoning (from RR to PF) for 20 acres, and a Conditional use Permit for a 52,000 sq.ft. church facility on the 20 acre site. No action was taken regarding the church Section 520 Site Plan pending Council action on the precedent applications. Chuck Palmer, Lakewood Evangelical Free Church, stated this plan''fits in the future direction of Lake Elmo. The church traffic will have a minimalipact except for weekends when church is in session. He would like to work t th e:::;city and MnDOT to resolve any problems. Jim Arkell stated he is a Lake Elmo resident who attends this :church and had served on the Planning Commission when they worked on the=t9:90eomp plan. Then the Commission realized it didn't have an ordinance that woad deal with churches. This is a perfect transition buffer moving south from`>ajor highway._ Paul Danielson, Consulting Engineer, Kimleior_ & Aaociates, reported this is the best site for the church in this 108acre;;site whzs in the middle on higher ground with buffers from other potential devlopmets. The ave modified the plan for a buffer on the west side, wetlands on north side a' amall :wetland throughout the site. There is no wetland litigation proposed. H sai : e spent<time with the VBWD in how to deal with water quality and storm water management plan and have obtained a permit from the VBWD. The roadway"avoidstn he wetlds and follows contours as much as possible to minimize tree impact. There are areas that don't drain out and have flood storage issues. Outlot B is=§lightly less than 10 acres and will be adjusted to ensure that the proposed Outlot B is`a:_Minimum of 10 acres in the Preliminary Plat. Craig Peterson, BWBR, said the building would be rising from the landscape without screaming for attention and nestled into the landscape with building materials of natural colors. It will be welcoming and inviting reflecting the personality of the church. Mayor Johnston asked the council should to deal with all development applications separately. Preliminary Plat: The City received a letter stating the applicant would be willing to correct Outlot B that is substandard. Attorney Filla noted the Council is addressing the preliminary plat illustrated on preplat drawing, prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc, dated February 7, 2005 which would create Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A, B, C and Deer Glen. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 7 If the Council should approve the preliminary plat, it should be subject to: 1) Outlot B is a minimum of ten acres, 2) Lot lines adjusted to ensure that Outlot D is a minimum of 10 acres or combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 1, and 3) If the open space development concept for proposed Outlot A is approved, it's use shall be restricted so that it can only be used in conjunction with the proposed open space project on Outlot A. Peter Beck, attorney for the applicant, explained Outlot D is a dedicated open space development concept plan. It is not intended to be a buildable parcel because it is dedicated open space. There will be a condition in Preliminary Plat approval that places this in dedicated open space. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to direct the City Attorney to draft a resolution approving the preliminary plat subject to the conditions stated by Attorney Filla. (Motion passed 5- 0:DeLapp stated the applicant has exempted the road, ask for the:satrme rights the others have been given.) Open Space Preservation Plan The City Planner explained the Planning Commission indicated the concept plan is inconsistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan Envird.mental Protection policies regarding residential developments conforming to tT `< mitations presented by natural features including natural drainage systems, by proposing significant modifications of natural grades and existing floodplain on thesite=__::„ The City Planner stated it is a subjective call regardingmuch floodplain can be filled or moved around. The Planning Commission thought it was significant enough to deny. The engineer for the church responded`there is noimpact on the jurisdictional wetlands. The soils are not conducive <ta_create wetlands.. The open space development: plan`roposes significant modifications to natural grade and to existing floodpla ris on the'a plicant's property and is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Environmental Protection policy. The plan is inconsistent with the purpose of the citylg Open Space: Preservation Ordinance because it proposes to significantly alter the natural drainage feature of the site. Comprehensive Plan Change for the 20 acres for the Church Mayor Johnston said he did not see the justification to change the City's Comprehensive Plan from RAD to PF. The Council reviewed the current comprehensive plan land use designation for this property and decided the current land use designations continue to reflect the Council's vision plan for development of land in this section of the city. The current comp plan land use designations will not require modifications as a result of the settlement between the City and the Met Council. Attorney Filla indicated the Council should implement the Comprehensive Plan changes required as a result of its settlement with the Metropolitan Council before it re-evaluates comp plan designations for specific areas of the City which should known by May. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 8 The Council indicated it was not willing to change the comprehensive plan. Rezoning from and RR Designation to a PF Designation Mayor Johnston noted that the hardship does not exist for a rezoning and there is a reasonable use of land under the current zoning. Attorney Filia pointed out that the rezoning would not be consistent with the City's 1990 Comp Plan, the City approved 2000 Comp Plan and with any changes to the City approved 2000 Comp Plan as a result of the agreement between the city and the Met Council. Conditional Use Permit The City Planner explained based on the traffic study the traffic generated by the proposed development would create traffic congestion at the intersection of Keats Avenue and Highway 36. Mr. Danielson reported that Mn/DOT said that this development would not create any unsatisfactory problem on Hwy36, but does present delays on Keats approaching Hwy 36. There would be a minima impact on the intersection except on weekends. Danielson said MnDOT would` s:the 3-corner intersection could be in now. The church is willing to sped $150,000 to improve this intersection. The requested Conditional Use Permit for proposed `LPt_,1 F lock 1 would allow development that is not consistent with the current zon g:for the applicant's property and because of the traffic generated by the pops_ed development would create serious traffic congestion at Keats Avenue and Hwy',6: Attorney Filla will draft a resolutin:iborpora'g Council direction. The council recommended denial of the comprehensive plan amendment and the rezoning from RR to a PF designation so the use will be denied because' it is not consistent with the zoning. M/S/P Conlin/Johnson.,- ; table thedevelopment applications for the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church untilhe April 5th Council meeting where resolutions will be provided for couch approval. (Motion passed 5-0.) B. Minor S bdivisicn/Site Plan and Zoning Variance. Amendment to the Develoortent Moratorium. Public Hearina:Vacation of drainage easements Lvnskv (Brookman 3rd Addition),Resolution No. 2005-025, Resolution No. 2005-026, Ordinance No. 97-153 Planner Dillerud reported the Planning Commission adopted a recommendation for denial of the applications for Minor Subdivision and Section 520 Site Plan that are proposed by the applicant to allow construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. office building on 39th Street North. Prior to the Commission's vote on the motion, the Chair offered the applicant's representative an opportunity to waive the 60 day city review window to allow time to process the variance issue, but that offer was declined. Dillerud noted that subsequent to February 14 one of the partners of the project formally requested the 60 day review waiver, and a variance application will be heard by the Planning Commission on March LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 9 14, 2005. Staff committed to the applicant to bring the applications to the Council on March 15, along with the Planning Commissionrecommendation on the variance. The Planner asked Council action on 1.) Moratorium; 2.) Site Plan; 3.) Variance; 4.) Minor Subdivision, and 5.) Hearing and Easement Vacation. A Resolution denying the Site Plan and Minor Subdivision, Ordinance regarding the Moratorium and a Resolution for the easement vacation is provided for Council review. Tracy Galowitz, applicant, explained it would be a prairie style building, similar to the professional buildings in Carriage Station. They simply want to keep their business in town. They need the moratorium lifted, a minor subdivision and are asking for a variance for asphalt shingles. DeLapp/No Second - to deny the moratorium because the City is still waiting for a master plan to see how this building fits into the plan. M/S/P Johnson/Johnston — to approve Ordinance 97-153:An Ordinance: removing property from the restrictions of the Village Area Development Moratorium. (Motion passed 4-1:DeLapp) M/S/P Johnson/Johnston - to approve Resolution No. 2(5-025 , approving the Section 520 Site Plan and Minor subdivision applicatos::::of Mike<fynsky/Lake Elmo Business Park Co. (Motion passed 4-1:DeLapp - They shouldin aliOlding tank as proposed, take 5 credits of sewer. It is a waste of their money ..::.:..:..:....... M/S/P DeLapp/Smith — to approve the sphalt roofing material as the same approved asphalt shingles used on thePrairie Ri e`fice Park and in the County, City Credit Union used based on the Findugs by the City (Motion passed 5-0). Mayor Johnston opened the PublicHearing at 11:29 p.m.. There was no one o speak for o-iagainst vacating the drainage easement. Mayor Johnston closed the Public. Hearing at 11:30 p.m. M/S/P Conlin/DeLapp `t approve Resolution No. 2005-026, A Resolution Vacating Existing Platted Drainage and Utility Easements in Brookman 3rd Addition. (Motion passed 5-0). C. Conditional Use Permit, Variance and Section 520 Site Man — City of Lake Elmo The City Planner reported the City has made application to construct an 11,000 sq.ft. Public Works/Park Maintenance building and a 500,000 gallon water storage tank on a 20 acre site adjacent Sunfish Park. The Conditional Use Permit is to locate a Public Facility on a PF zoned site. The variance is to the standards of the PF zone to allow standing seam metal exterior surfacing to retain the rural image of the proposed structure. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 10 Merle Olson said Lehart Friedrich sold 150 acres at $2,000 an acre, which at that time was much less than the going price. The City, Parks Commission voted and passed this so a covenant was made for this land to be used only for park purposes. Olson had talked to the Stillwater cross country ski coach who has 120 students using Sunfish Park trails and with maintenance facility built next to the park would be opening the City up to liability issues. Olson said his family intends to purchase this land back if not used for park purposes. Dave Morgan,said this park is everybody's neighborhood. You don't make water towers look like silos. The City Administrator was wrong when he said the City was free to use the land any way they wanted because it was not stated for park purposes only in the deeds and was trying to sell the facility by stating the building would hold 85% for park purposes. The bond issue was for park land and it was park land forTerpetuity. He said he was surprised that the Planning Commission members and some, of the Parks Commission members didn't even know we had so many parks.........:.. Jim Blackford said this is the wrong place for a tower and building to e placed. The Council should honor the wishes of all the people thateame before us.`' There was a retired Supreme Court Justice, who is a Lake Elmo resident, asked the Council to honor its commitments. He asked the Council to consider your legacy to the city. The proposed project is inconsistent to what the City stand'or. Dick Hedquist reminded the Council it is losing `a'p arkand`will not get it back. He g p ::...: you thought the water tower should be located where the people are using Oakdale water. Sue Dunn said she saw the entire presentation before the Planning Commission. She said there is condemn land by the Lake Jane Landfill& City could look into for locating a maintenance facility. She asked that_the City'proceed through the process which includes the commissions and mal the Council Committee meetings formal meetings that can be cancelled. In his letter dated March 3, 2005` Attorney Filla provided his review of all the documents which were recorded``relating tl :Sunfish park property. Based on the information that he reviewed, it was his opinan__hat the City owns fee title to the Sunfish Park property. The city is not legally restricted in its use of the Sunfish Park property provided that it is used for a public purpose. Administrator Rafferty stated there was an additional piece of property of 110 acres known as the West Sunfish acquisition. Some of the documents sated the land went to. Washington County and the City acquired it for $75,000. Mayor Johnston recommended sending this item back to staff to look into other locations for a water tower. Also, ask the Parks Commission if they want to place the City parks in a land trust. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 11 M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to turn back to staff to determine other possible locations for the water storage tower. (Motion passed 5-0). Ed Nielsen said he had no problem with the landfill area for a maintenance garage. There is also acreage owned by Ramsey County that could be explored. Jim Blackford said this is not a commercial corridor. M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to send this agenda item back to staff to look into locations in Sunfish Park as discussed for location of the mtnce garage. (Motion passed 5-0). D. Fields of St. Croix II/Little Blue Stem — Developer Improvements The City Planner reported staff requested direction from the Council regarding incomplete developer improvements within the Fields of St. Croix II plat, and the pending expiration of the Letter of Credit guaranteeing completion>of those improvements. The three primary areas of incomplete work arinterior street island landscaping, the Public Park located between Fields II and:a`lge; and buffer screen forestation along the plat west property line. The Counc ;.directedstaff to secure an extension of the Letter of Credit ($77,500), and advisthe developer (Robert Engstrom Companies) to, within 30 days provided the City Council with:=his plans and schedule to complete the work. Robert Engstrom has requested an amendmei t to_.the landscape island planting plan to substitute for the prairie grass plan that was__ pproved for those areas 5 years ago. The Planner noted it appears that the HOA has concurred in this plan, and staff also concurs that this is a better approach than;praie grass; chile no mention is made of the ball field/soccer field improvements _`work`had already commenced late last year. Park Superintendent Bouthilet directed worlos ended pendingresolution of the property ended P p Y location of the ball field andocceeld per e` plan approved by the Park Commission. CindySilk worth worth sat.. ere `°> arture from what the plan as presented in number g pp of trees and landscaping that is< one.Dillerud pointed out the landscape plan in the packet is the officplan. Engstrom said the plan is very schematic. Mayor Johnston said the City can take<e mone>and complete the plan and then bill Mr. Engstrom for the difference. Engstroae thought he had an agreement with the HOA Board of Directors. The Council asked that the staff schedule a meeting to discuss the landscape plan with Bob Engstrom, Planner Dillerud, Cindy Silkworth, President of the FoSC HOA when Planner Dillerud comes back from vacation E. Resolution No. 2005-023:Capital Improvements Program Amendment — Street Improvements M/S/PJohnson/DeLapp — to adopt Resolution 2005-023, Amending the 2005-2009 Capital Improvements Program regarding staging of street overlay projects in 2005-2006. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 12 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: A. Sunfish Lake Park Legal — See Agenda Item 9C. 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: The Council adjourn the meeting at 12:13 p.m. Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Resolution No. 2005-021 Approve Claims Resolution No. 2005-022 Worker's Compensation Resolution No. 2005-023 CIP Amendment for Street Im ogements Resolution No. 2005-024 St. Croix Valley Communitypinitcepter Resolution No. 2005-025 Section 520 Site Plan/Minci,Subdiviskikapplications of Mike Lynsky/Lake Elmo Business Park Co. Resolution No. 2005-026 Vacating Drainage Easements Resolution No. 2005-027-Resolution No. 2005-033,,,Lakewood Evangelical Church LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 13 MINUTES APPROVED: March 15, 2005 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 5:30 P.M. Interviews for Planning Commission Vacancies 1. AGENDA 2. MINUTES: February 15, 2005 3. PUBLIC INQUIRIES/INFORMATIONAL: A. Public Inquirers B. Public Informational: (1) Water Ski Show:Joe Kiesling (2) St. Croix Valley Family Center:Doris Karls (3) Planning Commission Appointments 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-019:Approving Claims 5. FINANCE: 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. MAINTENANCE/PARK/FIRE/BUIDLING: 8. CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT: A. Water Tower Storage Tank Design B. Resolution No. 2005-020:Approve Plans and Authorize Advertisement for Bids.' Water System Interconnect — Phase II - POSTPONED 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Septic and Shoreland Setback Variance, 8784 Lake Jane Trail:Gibson B. Comprehensive Plan Modifications (From February 28th Planning Commission Meeting) 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: A. Report of meeting with Jim Lugar, Washington County Park 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Mayor Johnston called the council meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. in the council chambers. PRESENT: Johnston, Conlin. DeLapp, Johnson, Smith, City Engineer Prew, City Planner Dillerud, Finance Director Tom Bouthilet and Administrator Rafferty. 1. AGENDA ADD: 11A. Regional Park Comprehensive Plan, 12. Council Reports: Discuss how public gets involved and how council talks to developers --.procedures need to be developed. M/S/P Johnson/Smith - to approve the March 1, 2005 City Council agenda, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 2. MINUTES: February 15, 2005 M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to approve the February 15, 2005 City Council minutes, as amended. (Motion passed 5-0). 3. PUBLIC INQUI ES/INFORMATIONAL:. A. Public Inquires Wyn John. Friends of the Library, reported that at the February 28th meeting of the Library Board, a motion to enter negotiations with the owner of the premises for leasing space at 3479 Lake Elmo Avenue was unanimously approved. The aim is to complete these negotiations by the next Library Board meeting on March 28. Library and County staff are gathering data on facility costs to convert the space to a suitable library location. When the upgrade costs are known, the Library Board Director is proposing to approach the City Council with a cost sharing request. As Secretary of the Friends of Lake Elmo Library, Wyn John asked that this request be treated sympathetically by the Council. Paul Ryberg, Friends of the Library, reported they will host a book drive at 3585 Laverne Avenue N., from 6 to 8 p.m. until March 19th. Items that can be used by the library will be given to the library. A book sale will be held March 19, and leftover paperbacks will be sent to military troops on active duty around the world. A silent auction may be held. Mr. Ryberg asked if the Friends of the Library meetings can be televised. B. Public Informational: (1)Water Ski Show:Joe Kiesling Joe Kiesling, Tri Lakes Association, requested Council approval of a Water Surface Use Permit for the Annual Water Ski Show on Lake Jane, August 13, 2005. Mr. Kiesling also requested a waiver for this event from the Water Surface Use Regulations, namely Section 1380.03, Subd. 2 Hours of Operation and Subd 5. Operation. The Tri-Lakes Association has secured the appropriate insurance coverage and the Sheriff's Department will sign off on the permit pending Council approval. The Fire Department will provide an emergency permit. Attorney Filla advised that the Water Surface Use regulations of the municipal code would have to be amended in order for the City to grant a special permit to waive these regulations. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson — to approve the permit request of Joe Kiesling, on behalf of the Tri-Lakes Association, to hold a Water Ski Show on Lake Jane, August 13, 2005, from 1- 5 p.m. based on the submittal of the appropriate information and on past favorable requests. (Motion passed 5-0.) M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson — to direct staff to amend the city code to grant a temporary suspension of the rules for an event such as this Water Ski Show and to approve a "No Parking" permit to park on Lake Jane Trail from Jarnaca Avenue to Jane Road North for this event based on past favorable requests. (Motion passed 5-0). LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 2 (2) St. Croix Valley Area Community Family Center:Doris Karls Doris Karls and other representatives presented a proposal for a St.Croix Valley Area Community Family Center Concept Plan which would meet the educational, recreational and wellness needs of families and individuals in the Greater Stillwater Area — serving the whole child, whole family, and whole community. Ms. Karls encouraged the city to have a person on the guidance team and would be requesting a small contribution for the project coordinator position. (3) Planning Commission Appointments The Council interviewed seven applicants for the Planning Commission starting at 5:30 p.m. At the February 15th meeting, the City Council appointed Todd Ptacek and Rod Sessing to the Planning Commission for 60 days. The city currently has two vacancies, First Alternate and Second Alternate. M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to reappoint Todd Ptacek to a third term on the Planning Commission. He is vital as a representative south of 10th street and important to have a good planning representative that is active in the process of working on the Met Council's Memo of Understanding. (Motion passed 5-0.) M/S/P Johnson/DeLapp - to appoint Deb Lyzenga, 21 Cimarron, as the First Alternate to the Planning Commission. (Motion passed 5-0.) MIS/P Smith/Conlin — to appoint Julie Fliflet, 4577 Lily Avenue, as the Second Alternate to the Planning Commission. (Motion passed 4-1:Johnston). 4. CONSENT AGENDA: A. Resolution No. 2005-019:Annroving Claims M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson - to adopt Resolution No. 2005-019, approving claim numbers 243, 244, DD350 through DD362. 26923 through 26954 which were used for staff payroll dated February 17th, 2005 and claims 26955 through 26998 in the total amount of $337,401.25. (Motion passed 5-0). 5. FINANCE: 6. NEW BUSINESS: 7. MAINTENANCE/PA FIRE/BUILDING: 8. CITY ENGINEER'S • PORT: A. Water Tower Storage Tank Design The City Engineer reported that at the February 15th meeting, the Council requested him to review the tank location west from the public works site. The location would be approximately 800 feet west of the public works building. This location is as far west as it can be moved without placing it in the woods. Property owners, within a one-half mile radius of the location of the water tower, were invited to offer their input on the water tower design. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 Ed Nielsen, a former Lake Elmo Parks commissioner, presented documentation from 1974 from three families who sold land to the city for park purposes only. He said that this is the only reason that these property owners signed the contracts. Other former Parks Commission members, Dave Morgan and Susan Dunn, agreed with Mr. Nielsen, in that placing a water tower near Sunfish Park would be a degradation of one of the city's most popular parks. Jim and Judy Blackford, who live near the land designated for a water tower, said he could not think of another regional example where a city water tower was placed in a public park in recent years. They emphasized there was a commitment made to the landowners to use this land for parks. it was a covenant all for parks. Mr. Blackford suggested Ideal Avenue which is high ground to build a tower. Administrator Rafferty explained this tower is a vital component to a comprehensive water system expansion that the City will be implementing over the next two years. The Council approved the early stages of the plan, which included the construction of a new 16-inch watermain that would supply the Tapestry subdivision with water. He said that the land at the entrance to the park is the specific property the city intended for the public works facility and the water tower. He added that land has been leased out by the city for commercial farming for a number of years and is not actually part of Sunfish Park. Sue Dunn suggested that the city investigate whether it could partner with Washington County and place a maintenance building near the county's parks maintenance building in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Council member Smith noted the council has heard citizens saying you can't put a water tower in a park, but a suggestion was made to place it in the Regional Park. Everybody wants the water, but nobody wants the tower in their backyard. In response to the suggestion of placing the public works facility on the Lake Jane Landfill property, the City Engineer responded using any property near the landfill would run the risk of methane gas contamination. Mayor Johnston explained designs of the public works building and water tower were taken to the Public Works Council Committee. Commitments have been made because we are along in the process. Johnston said the city wasn't legally required to have a public hearing on this item. The Council invited property owners to this meeting for their input on water tower design. The staff needs to look at the issues raised and determine if there are any legitimate legal issues. John Lalonde, his backyard backs up to Sunfish Lake Park, said he moved here six months ago, and he didn't understand why the city would think of placing a water tower and a maintenance building in a park. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to table the water tower agenda item and direct the city attorney to investigate the information presented at the Council meeting for possible legal ramifications. (Motion passed 5-0) LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 4 B. Resolution No. 2005-.020:Approve_Plans and Authorize Advertisement for Bids. Water System Interconnect — Phase II - POSTPONED M/S/P DeLapp/Johnson — to postpone this agenda item per the request of the City Engineer. (Motion passed 5-0). 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Septic and Shoreland Setback Variance, 8784 Lake Jane Trail:Gibson The City Planner reported that Bob Gibson, 8784 Lake Jane Trail, is requesting a variance to construct a new septic drainfield that encroached a total of 75 square feet into the OHW setback from Lake Jane. Since there are no other on -site options, the encroachment is minimal, and both the City Engineer and DNR recommend approval. The Planner advised at its February 28th meeting, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and recommended approval of the septic and shoreland setback variance. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin - to direct staff to draft a resolution for approval of a septic and shoreland setback variance for Bob Gibson at 8784 Lake Jane Trail per the recommendation of the Planning Commission, City Engineer and the DNR. (Motion passed 5-0.) B. Comprehensive Plan Modifications (From February 28th Planning Commission Meeting) The City Planner reported the Planning Commission will be completing their initial work on the Planning Policy modifications to the Comprehensive Plan that are responsive to the Met Council Memo of Understanding at its February 28th meeting, The Planner provided the latest draft, along with his cover memo to the Commission explaining the changes from the February 23rd draft. The Commission will address any additional guidance the Council may provide at the Corrunission's March 7th workshop, and then begin work on the Land Use Plan modifications responsive to the Policy. Mayor Johnston provided his comments in written form and is made part of these minutes. Council member DeLapp explained we have a Memo of Understanding with the Met Council and we can choose to do this. If we don't, with all the government changeovers, we would not have to put in 24,000 people. The City Planner responded this is a discussion for the land use section. Mayor Johnston noted it was naive to say we would be better if we delay the project. Council member DeLapp asked what about the schools. Mayor Johnston said he talked to the 834 school district. Council member Conlin asked to have the planner's draft in a soft copy form so the Council members could make changes/additions and then the planner could merge all the suggestions. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 5 The Planner said he will jflt Councils' comments and note who said what and \\here in his draft. 10. CITY ATTORNEY'S REPORT: 11. CITY ADMINISTRATOR'S REPORT: The Administrator reported he met with Jim Lugar, Washington County Park, and found that the County has not updated its comprehensive plan in 25 years. The County is amenable to connect with our proposed trails. The County has requested two representatives to sit on this committee to work on the new comprehensive plan. Sue Dunn has expressed an interest to sit on this committee. Council member Conlin said she would be interested and thought that Margaret Carlson would also have an interest. Administrator Rafferty will contact the Park Chair to find out if he or a parks member may be interested. Mayor Johnston suggested waiting until we find out who may be interested to serve on this committee and asked that this item be placed on the March 8th Council Committee meeting. 12. CITY COUNCIL REPORTS: Council member DeLapp indicated he was contacted by a representative of the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church, who worked for 3M, to see if he could get him to vote for approval of the church proposed for Lake Elmo. He expressed his concern that this type of communication is happening more and more between Council members and potential developers since the Met Council's agreement. Administrator Rafferty responded that he and Planner Dillerud have met with 3 or 4 developers and never had three council members because of the local meeting law. He said the proper contact is to hold meetings at City Hall. Attorney Filla advised that the council could adopt a code of ethics to address these specific concerns of the Council. Attorney Filla will provide a sample of a code of ethics adopted by another city to be presented at the March 8th Council committee meeting. Council member Liz Johnson reported her and Council member Smith received training on liability and management issues that dealt with the fire department. This will assist them in working with fire dept in the future. Council member Smith thanked the Planning Commission applicants and congratulated the new appointees, Deb Lyzenga and Julie Fliflet. Mayor Johnston volunteered to fill that role on the St. Croix community family center guidance team. This item and request for financial support will be added to the Public Health and Safety Council Committee meeting. Term. Council adjourned the meeting at 10:13 p.m. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 6 Respectfully submitted by Sharon Lumby, City Clerk Resolution No. 2005-019 Approve Claims Resolution No. 2005-020 Approve septic and shoreland setback variance. Gibson. 8784 Lake Jane Trail LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 1, 2005 7 Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL Agenda Item: Arbor Day Proclamation Background information for April 5, 2005: No. 3B(1.I Kathy Widin, Forestry Consultant and Lake Elmo Parks Commission recommend that the Council support the Arbor Day Proclamation for 2005 and an application for Tree City USA award Action Items: Proclaim the Month of May, 2005 to be ARBOR MONTH in the City and make out an application for the Tere City USA Award Attachments: Arbor Day Proclamation Letter from Kathy Widin, Forestry Consultant - 1-05 Parks Commission Minutes CITY OF LAKE ELMO ARBOR DAY PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: Minnesota is home to many of our nation's natural resources, foremost among them are our beautiful and abundant forests; and EREAS: Trees are an increasingly vital resource in Minnesota today, enriching our lives by purifying the air, conserving soil, water and energy, creating jobs through a large forest products industry, serving as recreational settirtgs, providing habitat for wildlife of all kinds, and creating beautiful landscapes to make our communities more livable; and WHEREAS: Human activities such as construction damage, pollution and neglect, as well as climatic extremes, disease and insects threaten our trees, creating the need for concerted action to ensure the future of community and rural forests in our state and throughout the country; and WHEREAS: Each individual can act locally to improve the environment by planting trees and ensuring that these trees are protected and receive proper maintenance in the years ahead; and WHEREAS: Each year on the last Friday in the month of April and throughout the month of May, the people of Minnesota pay special tribute to the vital natural resource that our trees represent and dedicate themselves to the continued vitality of our state's community and rural forests; NOW, THEREFORE, I, Dean JohnstcT)-,Mayor of the City of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim April:29, 2005 to be BOR DAY and the month of May, 2005 to be ARBOR MO Signed this 5t1 day of April, 2005 e Elmo, Minnesota. Dean Johnston, Mayor Tree City U.S.A. Katharine D. Widin, Ph.D. !Iat ealt Associates, 13457 6th St. Sf water, nesota S512 (651)436-8811 email: kdwidin@comcast.net 3/16/05 To: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator Parks Commission City Council City of Lake Elmo From: Kathy Widin, Forestry Consultant Re: Tree City USA Award Attached is a description of the Tree City USA Award which is administered by the National Arbor Day Foundation in Nebraska. The purpose of this award is to recognize communities that effectively manage their public tree resources. The Standards which cities must meet for this award are listed. Among these standards is the issuance of an Arbor Day Proclamation each year during the month of April. Since we can't always plant trees at the end of April in Minnesota, our state also recognizes May as Arbor Month. I ask that the Parks Commission act as the Tree Board for the City of Lake Elmo and that they recommend that the Council support the attached Arbor Day Proclamation for 2005 and an application for the Tree City USA award. I would also ask that the Council issue the Arbor Day proclamation in April. Mike Bouthilet and I are planning a tree planting ceremony with schoolchildren sometime during the month of May for this year's Arbor Day observance. I would like to thank the City of Lake Elmo for having the foresight to recognize that trees are important to the community and that they need continued care. As a TREE C community w ... additions to your awards denoting the year ... a Tee City USA flag ... special anniversary mate >.. along with the joy of stewardship and the gratitude of future gene USA, your receive... ANT The National Arbor Day Foundation, in cooperation with the U.B. E.prest Service and the National Association of State Foresters, recognizes towns and cities across America that meet the standards of the TREE CITY USA program At least half of the trees in a typical city are on public property...along streets, in parks, and around public buildings. The TREE CITY USA program is designed to recognize those The TREE CFW USA appl ttion for recertification must be completed by an appropriate city official (mayor, city forester, chairman of the tree board, etc.). Mail the completed . coznnaunitiee that effectively manage their pulxlie sersut1rceet, and to encourage the implementation of community tree management based on four TREE cry' USA Standards. These four standards provide structure for a community forestry program, require that program to demonstrate success based on the judgment of the state forester's office, and provide far an awareness and appreciation of trees among the Application Procedures application to your state forester along with all requeeted supporting material no later than December 31. Your state forester will evaluate application and forward it to The National Arbor Day Tr STANDARD 1: A Tree Board or Department A tree board le a group of concerned dozens, usually whtnteer, charged by admaroce fo devals? and admhlster a canpreherstre community tee maregernant program fa the Care or trees on public properly, Tree boards mealy function with the aid of professional foresters, In communities eith a population of more then t©,fx10, oily forestry departments with salaried employees ere often feasbte. These departments may or may not be supposed by advisory boards a administrative cztrrurrtaslons. STANDARD 2: A Community Tex Ordinance The cctmnuntty tee ordnance needs to designate the tree bard a deparfrnere and gave them tore resoortstAity kr Wing and tnplementfn9 the amusl ear antrdfy forestry wok plan. The adman a should determine public he care po6ates for planting, mairdsnance and removals. ideally, the dty tree Antra will make provisions fa establishing and updating a list of recommended street tree species to be planted Nom spacing arid location requirements. A sample tree ordnance may be obirthed by wrldng The National Arbor Day Foundation. STANDARD 3: A Community Forestry Program with en Annual budget of et least $2 pe capes merry communities bef jn the►' program by taking a irrvortary a the trees Towing c City USA Standards on public property. The species, location, and condleon of moil Zee ere noted (l.e, nearly, needs pruning, should be removed, etc.) and the inventory dera le summarized In a written report tar presentation and approval by the city carnal. The repel should be an objective analysis or the present state of the urban forest oath recommendations for future management The essential, ongoing eclvlty tar the we of vans along Meta, In parka, and on other pia* pincer b the mnnnutMy burgh program. The annual wok plan should adieu planning, watering and terdazfng, dead and hazardous tee removal, safety and One pruning, and heed and disease contra To be named as a TREE CITY USA, a town a city must swat, ati fw ass spent la tree bare bbudget for skeet doper rt or beard. park department's tree ergrendlaree, dead Vee removal, eta STANDARD 4: An Arbor Day obeervapot and Proclamation M Arbor Day observance can be stride and lodes a en atday err all -week oinbirVanee. A prodemetbr► Issued by the roam must eccorrtpeny Mrs etsserve ,tee and declare the observance of Arbor Day In your community. You can obtah a fee'Cetsbrate Art** Deyr parker by vatting The National Arbor Day Foundation. Along with Ideas for celebraWr9 the holiday, the padre contain a sample proclarnation. 0 TREE CT;''X USA Arbor Day dation ons your community for recertification Ongoing TREE CITY tJ recognition can make a strong contribution to your community's pride, and ft w11 keep you in touch with other comrnunities and resources which can help you improve your program. and d apply FbundaYou will be advised whether your community qualifies for TREE CITY USA recertification. The Parks Commission was called to order on 3-21-05 by Chairman Bob Schumacher. Also present were Commissioners Wagner. Nalipinski, Steele, Watters, Larson and Bouthilet. Administrator Rafferty was present from staff to assist in recoding the business of the Commission. Also present was Glen Von Wormer of SEH to discuss the final Trail Plan developed by the Parks Commission. A motion by Chuck Naplinski was seconded by Watters approving the Agenda. The Motion passed with no opposition. A motion by Chuck Naplinski was seconded by Waters approving the minutes of January 19, 2005, The Motion passed with no opposition. A motion by Wagner was seconded by Watters approving the minutes of February 2205. The Motion passed with no opposition. Glen Van Wormer of SHE presented a map of a revised trail plan incorporating the comments received from the public and during the open house. He also provided written documentation in summary form of all the comments received from the public. He also explained that the final plan was being completed and would be forwarded to the Parks Commission for their final review so it could be approved by the Commission and forwarded to the Planning Commission. After reviewinL, the Trail Plan. the Planning Commission would forward the plan to City Council for final approval. The Commission thanked Glen for his excellent work on the trail plan. Glen provided summarized comments in written for from the public. A new OP development plan "Farms of Lake Elmo was presented showing a plan with the proposed trail system as being designed for private use only. The Commission reviewed the plan and found the proposed plan is consistent with the newly developed "Trails Plan". The developer will be making a financial contribution may potentially provide public easements for pathway dedication consistent with the new trail plan. Dr. Kathy Widin, the Lake Elmo Tree Doctor, requested the Commission recommend to the City Council to approve the Arbor Day Proclamation as a step toward gaining a Tree City USA designation. A motion by Watters was seconded by Chuck Naplinski recommending the Arbor Day Proclamation to the City Council. The Motion passed with no opposition. The Parks Commission asked the City Administrator to as Dr. Widin to come to the April Commission meeting to review the services she is and will be providing the city in 2005. Meeting adjourned at 8:30. Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL No. 3B(2). Agenda Item: Planning Commission Appointment Background Information for April 5,2005: At its February 15, 2005 meeting, the City Council appointed Rod Sessing o the Planning Commission for sixty days. The 60-day appointment will be expiring so staff is asking for Council direction. Action Items: Request Council direction Attachments: Person responsible: S.Lumby Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: PUBLIC INFORMATIONAL No. 3B(1), Agenda Item: ANNOUNCE 2005 BOA 0 . PPEAL AND EQUALIZATION MEETING Background Information for April 5 2005: The Lake Ehno Board of Review will meet at City Hall on Wednesday. May 4, 2005, between the hours of 4:00 and 6:00 for the purpose of reviews and correcting the assessment of said Real Estate for the year 2005, The Citv has received the 2005 Assessment Report. Action Items: Announce May 4, 2005 as the date of the 2005 Board of Review Attachments: 2005 Assessment Report Person responsible: S.Lumby CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-034 RESOLUTION APPROVING CLAIMS BE IT RESOLVED THAT Claim Numbers 248, 249, DD373 through DD385, 27060 through 27086, were used for Staff Payroll dated March 17th, 2005; 250, 252, DD386 through DD395, 27088 through 27099, were used for Staff Payroll dated March 31st, 2005; claims 251, 27100 through 27151, in the total amount of S147,793.85 are hereby approved. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5'1' day of April, 2005. Dean A. Johnston Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty City Administrator Accounts Payable Computer Check Proof List User: administrator Printed: 03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM invoice No Vendor: ALEXA IR 8270 Vendor:A LLSAFE 64677 64737 Vendor:ARAM 629-5674908 629-5684599 Vendor:ASPENMI 59726 VendorATTWE 023-2750230 Vendor: AVAYA 2720793512 Vcndor:BATTYPL 32-97057 32-97739 Description Alex Air Apparatus, Inc Handle - Fire Dept Check Total: All Safe Fire & Security Fire Extinguishers Tcsts & Certification Fire Extinguishers Tests & Certification Check Total: A ramark Linen - City Hall Linen - City Hall Check Total: Aspen Mills, Inc. Changing over from light to dark blue Check Total: CINGULAR WIRELESS Floater phones Fire Dept Check Total: AVAYA Inc. Monthly Telephone Maint, Check Total: Batteries Plus Woodbury Battery Tester Cienerator - Parks AP - Computer Check Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 48.38 04/05/2005 48.38 322.45 04/05/2005 98.93 04/05/2005 421.38 50.84 04/05/2005 50.84 04/05/2005 101.68 1,890.73 04/05/2005 1,890.73 20.49 04/05/2005 20.49 150.36 04/05/2005 150.36 46.23 04/05/2005 28.22 04/05/2005 Check Sequence: 1 101-420-2220-44040 Check Sequence: 2 101-420-2220-44040 101-420-2220-44040 Check Sequence: 3 101-410-1940-44010 101-410-1940-44010 Check Sequence: 4 101-420-2220-44170 Check Sequence: 5 101-420-2220-43210 Check Sequence: 6 101-410-1940-44040 Check Sequence: 7 101-430-3100-42400 101-450-5200-42210 Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACM Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 1 Invoice No Vendor: BIFFS W249688 Vendor:CAREERTR 7722502 Vendor:CARQUEST 26878 D3729I5 U372931 D374869 D374873 Vendor:COLLYA Emp. Claim Vendor: DA 1-11_,G 25682 Vendor: EARLANDE 0064733-IN Vendor: EMSUSA 295368 Vendor: F. I.R.E. 04184 04374 Description Check Total: Biffs Inc* Sunfish Lake Park Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number CareerTrack Dealing w/difficult people Conference DJ Check Total: Car Quest Credit Halogen Beam - Fire Dept, Socket Lamp, Disc pads, mirror glass - Public W Metric Ilex Set, Bits Check Total: Bonn teCol lyard EMT Refresher Reimbursement Check Total: Dahlgren Shardlow and Uban Fire Services Analysis Check Total: Earl F. Andersen, Inc, Street Signs Check Total: Emergency Medical Supply, Inc. EMSupplies - Fire Dept Chcck Total: Fire Instruction &Rescue Education Inc Classes - Fire Dept: Car Fire, Gas Emer. Classes - Fire Dept: RIT Training AP - Computer Check Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) 74.45 94.26 04/05/2005 94.26 149.00 04/05/2005 149.00 -21.94 5.94 2.67 115.72 46.74 149.13 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 175.00 04/05/2005 175.00 Check Sequence: 8 101-450-5200-44120 Check Sequence: 9 101-410-1110-44370 Check Sequence: 10 101-430-3100-42210 101-420-2220-42210 101-420-2220-42210 101-430-3100-42210 101-430-3100-42400 Check Sequence: 11 101-420-2220-44370 Check Sequence: 12 8,825.56 04/05/2005 101-420-2220-44300 8,825.56 266.61 04/05/2005 266.61 43,20 04/05/2005 43.20 600,00 04/05/2005 450.00 04/05/2005 Check Sequence: 13 101-430-3100-42260 Check Sequence: 14 101-420-2220-42080 Check Sequence: 15 101-420-2220-44370 101-420-2220-44370 Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No AI Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACM Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 2 Invoice No Description Check Total: Vendor:FIREEQUI Firc Equipment Specialties 4004 Name Patch - Kevlar - Fire Dept. Check Total: Vendor:FOUR Four Seasons Service 23-039153 City Hall Supplies Check Total: Vendor: FREDS Fred's Tire 419900 Tire Repair - Fire Dept 3183 Check Total: Vendor:FXL FXL, Inc* April 2005 Assessing Services April 2005 Check Total: Amount Payment Date Acct Number 1,050.00 40.38 04/05/2005 40.38 58.85 04/05/2005 58.85 67.90 04/05/2005 67.90 1,700.00 04/05/2005 1,700,00 Check Sequence: 16 101-420-2220-44170 Cheek Sequence: 17 101-410-1940-44300 Check Sequence: 18 101-420-2220-44040 Check Sequence: 19 101-410-1550-43100 Vendor:GENESIS Next Genesis Productions Check Sequence: 20 IVC00431 Software issues 112.50 04/05/2005 101-410-1520-43180 1VC00451 Spam filter, Internet down 337.50 04/05/2005 101-410-1520-43180 IVCMonthly Monthly Software Support 900.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1520-43180 Check Total: 1,350.00 Vendor:HACH HACII Company 4203998 Fluoride Testing Vials Check Total: 174.66 04/05/2005 174.66 Check Sequence: 21 601-494-9400-42270 Vendor: Hotsy Hursy EQUIPMENT OF MINNESOTA Check Sequence: 22 23453 Nozzle, pipes, hoses - Public Works 70.98 04/05/2005 603-496-9500-42400 Check Total: 70.98 Vendor:IAFCREG IAFC FRI 2005 Reg. fees - Greg Malmquist Check Total: Vendor; LEAGMN LMCIT 2005 Safe League of MN Cities Safety and Loss Control Workshop AP - Computer Check Proof'st (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) 695.00 04/05/2005 695.00 40.00 04/05/2005 Check Sequence: 23 101 -420-2220-44370 Check Sequence: 24 101-410-1520-44370 Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 3 Invoice No Vendor: LEAGUE 1-00002054 I Vendor: MALMQ Claim Description Check Total: League ofMinnesota Cities 2005 Fire - Liz Johnson Check Total: GregMalmquist DVD Player - Training Check Total: VendorMENARDSO Menards - Oakdale 91444 Used railroad ties - Fire Dept Check Total: Vendor: METROCA 02161642 Metrocall Inc. Pagers - Fire Dept Check Total: Vendor: MNFI RESC MN State Fire Rescue School ERTC/212 Class - Bonnie Collyard Check Total: Vcndor:NEXTEL 761950227-024 761950227-024 761950227-024 761950227-024 Vendor:ONECALL 5020506 Vendor:PETERSO 1! 135M 11140M 11 1 45M 11150M 11161M Nextel Communications Cellular Phone Service - Admin Cellular Phone Service - Bldg Dept. Cellular Phone Service - Public Works Cellular Phone Service - Parks Check Total: Gopher State One-CallOne Call Concepts, Inc Line locates - February 2005 Check Total: Peterson Frain & Bergman Administration Criminal Pros Public Improv. Projects Community Dev. Auto Forfeiture AP - Computer Cheek Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number 40.00 20.00 04/05/2005 20,00 58.40 04/05/2005 58.40 14,89 04/05/2005 14.89 86.21 04/05/2005 86.21 105.00 04/05/2005 105.00 76,00 04/05/2005 32.64 04/05/2005 48.96 04/05/2005 I 7.87 04/05/2005 175.47 33.75 04/05/2005 33,75 2,439.99 04/05/2005 2,868.68 04/05/2005 544.36 04/05/2005 198.00 04/05/2005 94.50 04/05/2005 Check Sequence: 25 101-410-1110-44370 Check Sequence: 26 101-420-2220-42000 Check Sequence: 27 101-420-2220-42400 Check Sequence: 28 101-420-2220-43210 Check Sequence: 29 101-420-2220-44370 Check Sequence: 30 101-410-1940-43210 101-420-2400-43210 101-430-3100-43210 101-450-5200-43210 Check Sequence: 31 101-430-3100-44300 Check Sequence: 32 101-410-1610-43040 101-410-1610-43045 409-480-8000-43040 803-490-9070-43040 101-410-1610-43045 Reference ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 4 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference Check Total: 6,145.53 Vendor:PINKY Pinky's Sewer Service, Inc. Check Sequence: 33 ACH Enabled: No 39848 Pumping - 8012 50th St 200.00 04/05/2005 602-495-9450-44030 41356 Pumping - 7990 50th St 150.00 04/05/2005 602-495-9450-44030 Check Total: 350.00 Vendor:PITNEY Pitney Bowes Check Sequence: 34 ACH Enabled: No 2817997-MR05 Postage Machine Rental 693.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1940-44010 Check Total: 693.00 Vendor:POSTOFFI POSTMAS 1'LR Check Sequence: 35 ACH Enabled: No Newsletter Newsletter April 378.30 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43220 Check Total: 378.30 Vendor:PRESS StevenPress Check Sequence: 36 ACH Enabled: No 3/14-3/30 Cable Operator - Council Meetings 81.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43620 3/14-3/30 Cable Operator - Planning Com. 222.75 04/05/2005 101-410-1910-43620 Check Total: 303.75 Vendor:QWEST Qwest Check Sequence: 37 ACH Enabled: No 651714-2209 456 Final - Hudson Lift Station 5.27 04/05/2005 602-495-9450-43210 Check Total: 5.27 Vendor:REED Reed Business Information Check Sequence: 38 ACH Enabled: No 2846087 Legal Ad - Watermain Project 133.32 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43510 2850240 Legal Ad - Watermain Project 133.32 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43510 Check Total: 266.64 Vendor:Reserve Pitney BowesReserve Account Check Sequence: 39 ACH Enabled: No 20313037 Postage 500.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43220 Check Total: 500.00 Vendor:ROGERS Rogers Printing Services Check Sequence: 40 ACH Enabled: No 12389 Envelopes 122.48 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-42000 12389 Business Cards - Dean Johnston 30.88 04/05/2005 101-410-1110-44300 12412 3200 Newsletters 983.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-43090 AP - Computer Check Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) Page 5 Invoice No Vendor:RUD 3/14-3/30 3/15-3/31 9332 Vendor: S&T 01JU8519 01JU8519 Vendor:Sherm Emp. Claim Emp. Claim Vendor: SPRINT 0526076028-3 Vendor: STCROIXF Donation Vendor: STJOSEPH SF02579 SR13668 Vendor: TKDA 000200501056 000200501061 000200501062 000200501063 000200501063 000200501063 000200501063 Description Check Total: DianePrince-Rud Cleaning City Hall 3/14-3/30 Cleaning Fire Hall 3/15-3/31 Cleaning Supplies Check Total: S&T Office Products, Inc. Binders, paper Paper Check Total: RobertSherman Milage - B. Sherman - pager repairs Training Videos - Shipping Check Total: Sprint Connection Card - Fire Dept. Check Total: St. Croix Valley Comm. Center Donation Check Total: St Joseph Equipment, Inc. 5 Gal Trans. Fluid Rental Check Total: TKDA, Inc. 2004 NPDES Phase II Permit Water Sys Interconnection Water Tank MSA Reporting 2005 Street Project Review Public Works Building Water Tower AP - Computer Check Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 1,136.36 360.00 04/05/2005 360.00 04/05/2005 21.60 04/05/2005 741.60 333.72 04/05/2005 43.45 04/05/2005 377.17 25.13 04/05/2005 77.60 04/05/2005 102.73 Check Sequence: 41 101-410-1940-44010 101-420-2220-44010 101-410-1940-42110 Check Sequence: 42 101-410-1320-42000 101-410-1910-42000 Check Sequence: 43 101-420-2220-43310 101-420-2220-44370 Check Sequence: 44 40.15 04/05/2005 101-420-2220-43210 40.15 2,000.00 04/05/2005 2,000.00 42.37 04/05/2005 213.00 04/05/2005 255.37 98.52 04/05/2005 18,068.06 04/05/2005 785.92 04/05/2005 261.39 04/05/2005 380.03 04/05/2005 7,334.11 04/05/2005 215.82 04/05/2005 Check Sequence: 45 101-410-1110-44300 Check Sequence: 46 101-430-3100-42120 101-430-3100-43150 Check Sequence: 47 603-496-9500-43030 601-494-9400-43030 601-494-9400-43030 402-480-8000-43030 409-480-8000-43030 410-480-8000-46200 601-494-9400-43030 ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 6 Invoice No Description Amount Payment Date Acct Number Reference 000200501063 000200501063 000200501063 000200501063 000200501064 000200501075 000200501144 Deer Glen - Septic Review 2004 NPDES Report Staff Meetings Whispering Valley, Tapestry Council Meetings 2/1, 2/15 Public Works @ Sunfish Lake Design Water Leak Location - 13 & EPB1vd Check Total: Vendor:UMCONTED U of M Continuing Education MN Clerks I MN Mun Clerks Program - C. Freeman Check Total: Vendor: WAS -AG Lease/Deposit Vendor:WASHWFC East Metro Econ East Metro Econ Washington Cty Ag Society Lease and Deposit - Wash. Cty Fair Check Total: Washington County Conference - Dean Johnston Conference - Liz Johnson Check Total: Vendor: WINKBRAD BradWinkels Emp. Claim EMT Refresher - Reimbursement Check Total: Vendor:XCEL 19125036 19125036 19125036 19135023 19143055 19324774 21367342 Xcel Energy Traffic Lights I94& Inwood Softball Field Hudson Lift Station 3585 Laveme Ave N City Lights 3303 Langly Ct, 11975 55th St Wells 3880 Laverne Check Total: Total for Check Run: Total Number of Checks: AP - Computer Check Proof List (03/31/2005 - 1:59 PM) 1,097.83 365.94 2,596.39 641.51 200.00 8,428.86 216.20 40,690.58 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 04/05/2005 602-495-9450-43030 603-496-9500-43030 101-410-1930-43030 803-490-9070-43030 101-410-1930-43030 410-480-8000-46200 601-494-9400-43030 Check Sequence: 48 160.00 04/05/2005 101-410-1320-44380 160.00 Check Sequence: 49 153.00 04/05/2005 101-430-3100-44380 153.00 10.00 04/05/2005 10.00 04/05/2005 20.00 Check Sequence: 50 101-410-1110-44370 101-410-1110-44370 Check Sequence: 51 175.00 04/05/2005 101-420-2220-44370 175.00 21.52 04/05/2005 72.21 04/05/2005 39.52 04/05/2005 143.80 04/05/2005 1,562.45 04/05/2005 887.91 04/05/2005 23.00 04/05/2005 2,750.41 75,396.58 52 Check Sequence: 52 101-430-3160-43810 101-450-5200-43810 602-495-9450-43810 101-410-1940-43810 101-430-3160-43810 601-494-9400-43810 101-430-3160-43810 ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No ACH Enabled: No Page 7 MONTH Jan March April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Totals 1 11135 Administration $4,443.11 $6,883.10 11140 Criminal Pros $3,456.17 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 2005 BILLING SUMMARY 11145 Public Imp. Proj $66.00 11150 Community Dev $673.71 $6,324.85 $610.36 $871.71 11155 Civil Litigation $210.00 $210.00 11161 Auto Forfeiture $464.00 $558.50 TOTAL $9,312.99 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $15,458.52 3/15/2005 Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 PERSON FRAMCiBERG1VIAN 11135-040002 2004 RECODIFICATION 11135-920001 Administration ACCOUNT NO: (651)291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 02/28/2005 11135M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 132.00 0.00 0.00 $132.00 2,297.50 10.49 0.00 $2,307.99 2,429.50 10.49 0.00 $2,439.99 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTIMILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo MN 55042 P TERSQN FRAM BERGMAN ACCOUNT NO: (651) 291-8955 (651) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 02/28/2005 11140M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11140-030001 Misc Prosecutions 2,560.00 28.68 0.00 $2,588.68 11140-030066 Brama, Angela Ann 3rd degree DUI, 3rd degree .10 50.00 0.00 0.00 $50.00 11140-050015 Pavlak, Jamie Elizabeth assault 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050016 Brama, Angela 2nd degree DUI 0.00 0.00 0.00 $0.00 11140-050020 Bradley, Terry DAC, no proof of insurance 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 11140-050031 Young, Roger Alan GM -fail to report injury accident 10.00 0.00 0.00 $10.00 11140-050033 Aumer, Daniel Ryan No DL, no insurance, no proof of insurance 5.00 0.00 11140-050036 Martenson, Linda Kay park/drive where prohibited 5.00 0.00 0.00 $5.00 0.00 $5.00 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St, Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO r PETERSON. � ''BERGMAN C51�I. � +�01>InylYi� et�v� ACCOUNT NO: FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES 11140-050037 Walters, Diane Elaine GM -intent to escape MV tax 10.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050038 Smith, Kandis Lorraine failure to yield 5.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050039 Schmotter, Nicholas domestic assault 5.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050042 Lynch, Dennis Jr. no insurance, no proof of ins. 10.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050043 Van Allen, Kenneth J. domstic assault 5.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050044 Johnson, Mary Jo DOC 5.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050045 Patterson, Desiree Candelario 3rd degree DUI 77.50 0.00 0.00 11140-050047 Thorsen, Michael J. domestic assault 5.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050048 Foley, Rose Marie 2nd debgree DUI, test refusal 10.00 0.00 0.00 11140-050049 Spaulding, Melissa Anne no proof of insurance 10.00 0.00 0.00 (651) 291-8955 (6511 228-1753 Facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 2 02/28/2005 11140M BALANCE $10.00 $5.00 $5.00 $10.00 $5.00 $5.00 $77.50 $5.00 $10.00 $10.00 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WITH PAYMENT. 11 Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 2 :112, av CITY OF LAKE ELMO FEES EXPENSES 11140-030050 Van, Ana GM -school bus arm violation 10.00 0.00 11140-050051 Braun, Christopher Francis domestic assault, 911 intereference 47.50 0.00 2,840.00 ACCOUNT NO: ADVANCES 0.00 0.00 28.68 0.00 (651) 291-8955 16511 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 3 02/28/2005 11140M BALANCE $10.00 $47.50 $2,868.68 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAY LE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATE ENT T PAY ENT. Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 ACCOUNT NO: (6511 291-8955 16511 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 4/11-0991098 Page: 1 02/28/2003 11145M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11145-040003 WATER SYSTEMS CONNECTION 303.00 0.75 30.00 $333.75 11145-050001 PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING 209.00 1.61 0.00 $210.61 512.00 2.36 30.00 $544.36 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE END OF THE MONTE!. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONTH WILL 1E CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTHS STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATE ENT WITH PAYMENT. Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St. Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 _ PETERSON, 'BERG 11.41‘lr ACCOUNT NO: (651) 291-8955 (65)) 228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID #41-0991098 Page: 1 02/28/2005 11150M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE 11150-040005 LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH - REZONING - SUP 132.00 0.00 0.00 $132.00 11150-050002 LE PROFESSIONAL CENTER C/O J. MCDONALD VARIANCE 66.00 0.00 0.00 . $66.00 198.00 0.00 0.00 $198.00 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AN PAY LE TO THE END OF THE MONTH. PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAV OF THE MONTH WILL RE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE C*PY SF ST TEMENT WTH P YMENT. Suite 300 50 East Fifth Street St, Paul, MN 55101-1197 CITY OF LAKE ELMO 3800 LAVERNE AVENUE NORTH LAKE ELMO MN 55042 11161-050001 Brama, Angela vehicle forfeiture-2005 ACCOUNT NO: 16511 291-8955 (6511228-1753 facsimile Federal Tax ID 441-0991098 Page: 1 02/28/2005 11161M FEES EXPENSES ADVANCES BALANCE scalade 94.50 0.00 94.50 0.00 0.00 $94.50 0.00 $94.50 THIS STATEMENT IS DUE AND PAYABLE TO THE ENO OF THE MONTH PAYMENTS RECEIVED AFTER THE LAST DAY OF THE MONT11 WILL BE CREDITED TO THE NEXT MONTH'S STATEMENT. PLEASE RETURN ONE COPY OF STATEMENT WIT PAY ENT. Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ENGINEER'S/ADMINISTRATOR'S No. 8 A. City Council REPORT April 5, 2005 Agenda Item: Public Works/Parks Facility and Water Tower Location B. Over the last several years the city has retained the services of professional consulting • -is and community study groups to evaluate and recommend needed community facilities. In 2004 the City Council held a public informational meeting on proposed new city facilities planned for construction in 2005. The city received input from the residents on combined and separate facility site locations for City Hall, Public Works and potential Fire Station(s). Since that meeting, in the fall of 2004, city staff has continued to identify and evaluate alternative sites to relocate the Public Works/Parks operation, presently adjacent to the old landfill site, with specific Council and Council Committee directives to plan for the current Sunfish location. The current design (barn like) of the structure reflects the City Council's deliberate efforts to appropriately incorporate design features that reflect the surrounding land characteristics and foster "rural character" of the community. The Fire Department operations and facility needs would continue to be evaluated and identified through a new study now completed in a final draft form. The City Hall has three active locations presently under review. At the last City Council meeting staff was asked to review additional sites for the Public Works/Parks operations and the proposed Water Tower. City staff and the city engineer have worked to finalize facility locations for the Water Tower and Public Works/parks operation. As requested, staff has looked at alternate sites for both the public works building and the water tower. Below is a summary of our findings: 1. City Owned Property within the Closed Landfill Site The City owns all l 10 acres of the closed landfill site. This is where our current Public Works site is located. We met with representatives of the MPCA Closed Landfill unit to discuss possible land use alternatives for this site. They are very concerned about methane migration around the landfill site. They did not have problem with a water tower near our existing pole barn as long as it was a legged tank. They strongly recommend that no new buildings be built on this site. This site was originally selected in the Feasibility Report. Ground elevation is about 950. 2. Washington and Ramsey County Owned Property south of the Closed Landfill site. Washington and Ramsey County own 30 acres directly south of the closed landfill site. The property has a land use easement to the MPCA. The MPCA is checking their records on this site, as they assumed they owned the site. The MPCA would allow a fluted column or a composite tank on the southwest corner of the parcel, near Jamaca Avenue only. The remainder of the site may be needed in the future for water or gas treatment. No other facilities would be allowed on this site. An additional 2,000 feet of 16-inch water -main would need to be extended to the site along Jamaca Avenue at an additional cost of $160,000.00. Ground elevation is about 955. 3. Cif!, owned propertv in "Sunfish West". The City owned property east of the landfill permit area contains a high hill which would be suitable for the tank. The site is heavily wooded and would need tree clearing, an access road built, along with a significant water -main extension to the site. Additional cost would be about $200,000.00. Ground elevation is 980. Because of the elevation and dense woods, this site would not be suitable for the Public Works site. 4. 3M Property It would be feasible to construct a water tower on the 3M property, west of Wildflower Shores. Depending on the location, there might be as much as 4,000 additional feet of watennain plus over sizing of other watermains, at an estimated cost of $460,000.00. Property acquisition costs are not known at this time. Ground elevation could be as high as 1010. Advantages to a site here would be the increased water service area due to the higher elevation of the tank, and distance from residential properties. Disadvantages would be increased pump size at our wells to pump up to the higher elevation. There may be no easy way to loop the watermains for the foreseeable future. Also, the site is not zoned Public Facilities, any property acquired would need a rezoning. Acquiring a site large enough for the Public Works Building from 3M is not being considered. 5. Common Ground Church Property The Common Ground church owns the property between TH 5 and Stillwater Boulevard. They have agreed to meet to discuss selling about an acre worth of property; with no commitment to sell, for a water tower site. They indicated they would like to keep the remainder for future expansion. The site would be south and east of the entrance to Sunfish Park. Ground elevation is 950. The site is already zoned Public Facility. The advantage to the site is its close proximity to the planned watennain route. However a disadvantage is that the houses on the north side of Stillwater Boulevard would have the water tower directly in front of their houses. Discussion on this site would be for the water tower only. as previously proposed. The staff recommends we continue to study the water tower sitting. Summary These sites were ones brought up at the CUP hearing or identified by staff. There may be other sites throughout the City for the public works building; however the staff has been searching for many years for a suitable site. Sites for the water tower are limited due to the constraints of our service area. Because of its central location within the City, its distance from residential properties, and the ability to expand, it is the best site in the City to place this facility. The staff recommends the Public Works Building be located at Sunfish Park as proposed. The staff recommends we continue to study the water tower sitting. Action Items: Pertaining to PW/Parks Facility A motion directing staff finalize plans, specifications and bid the Public Works/Parks facility in the Sunfish location. Approve the pending CUP for that purpose and grant the variance request for the exterior material usage as proposed. Pertaining to the Water Tower A motion directing staff to hold a public meeting for all currently proposed Water Tower locations that remain as a viable possibility. Person responsible:, Martin Rafferty, City Administrator Tom Prew, City Engineer Attachments: Engineer Report Resolutions ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS March 24, 2005 Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Public Works and Water Tower Alternate Sites Consideration City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 13186.000 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Dear Mayor and City Council: As requested, we have looked at alternate sites for both the public works building and the water tower. Below is a summary of our findings: 1. City Owned Property within the Closed Landfill Site The City owns all 110 acres of the closed landfill site. This is where our current Public Works site is located. We met with representatives of the MPCA Closed Landfill unit to discuss possible land use alternatives for this site. They are very concerned about methane migration around the landfill site. They did not have problem with a water tower near our existing pole barn as long as it was a legged tank. They strongly recommend that no new buildings be built on this site. This site was originally selected in the Feasibility Report. Ground elevation is about 950. 2. Washington and Ramsey County Owned Property south of the Closed Landfill site. Washington and Ramsey County own 30 acres directly south of the closed landfill site. The property has a land use easement to the MPCA. The MPCA is checking their records on this site, as they assumed they owned the site. The MPCA would allow a fluted column or a composite tank on the southwest corner of the parcel, near Jamaca Avenue only. The remainder of the site may be needed in the future for water or gas treatment. No other facilities would be allowed on this site. An additional 2,000 feet of 16-inch watermain would need to be extended to the site along Jamaca Avenue at an additional cost of $160,000.00. Ground elevation is about 955. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity Water Tower and Public Works Site Reviews City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota March 24, 2005 Page 2 3. City owned property in "Sunfish West" The City owned property east of the landfill permit area contains a high hill which would be suitable for the tank. The site is heavily wooded and would need tree clearing and an access road built, along with a significant watermain extension to the site. Additional cost would be about $200,000.00. Ground elevation is 980. Because of the elevation and dense woods, this site would not be suitable for the Public Works site. 4. 3M Property It would be feasible to construct a water tower on the 3M property, west of Wildflower Shores. Depending on the location, there might be as much as 4,000 additional feet of watermain plus over sizing of other watermains, at an estimated cost of $460,000.00. Property acquisition costs are not known at this time. Ground elevation could be as high as 1,010. Advantages to a site here would be the increased water service area due to the higher elevation of the tank, and distance from residential properties. Disadvantages would be increased pump size at our wells to pump up to the higher elevation. There may be no easy way to loop the watermains for the foreseeable future. Also, the site is not zoned Public Facilities, therefore any property acquired would need a rezoning. Acquiring a site large enough for the Public Works Building from 3M is not being considered. 5. Common Ground Church Property The Common Ground Church owns the property between TH 5 and Stillwater Boulevard. They have agreed to meet to discuss selling about an acre's worth of property, with no commitment to sell, for a water tower site. They indicated they would like to keep the remainder for future expansion. The site would be south and east of the entrance to Sunfish Park. Ground elevation is 950. The site is already zoned Public Facility. The advantage to the site is its close proximity to the planned watermain route. However, a disadvantage is that the houses on the north side of Stillwater Boulevard would have the water tower directly in front of their houses. Discussion on this site would be for the water tower only. Water Tower and Public Works Site Reviews City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota March 24, 2005 Page 3 Summary These sites were ones brought up at the CUP hearing or identified by staff. There may be other sites throughout the City for the public works building; however the staff has been searching for many years for a suitable site. Sites for the water tower are limited due to the constraints of our service area. Because of its central location within the City, its distance from residential properties, and the ability to expand, it is the best site in the City to place this facility. The staff recommends the Public Works Building be located at Sunfish Park as previously proposed. The staff recommends we continue to study the water tower sitting. Thomas D. Prew, P. E. City Engineer TDP:tlb WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT AND EXPANSION POSSIBLE WATER TOWER LOCATIONS REVISED MARCH 24, 2005 0 600 1,200 mmoczmumi Feet Limitation of Liability This document is not a legally recorded map or survey and is not intended to be used as one. This map is a compilation of records and information from various state, county, and city offices, and other sources. ElM- 110 I. lin 161 Legend u1 City Limits Proposed Water Tower * Ex. City WeII/Tank 44"., � Future Watermain ! Proposed Watermain Phase I - Spring 2005 Phase II - Summer 2005 Phase III - When Needed Watermain Size 4" 6" 8" 12" 16" For Further Information Contact City of Lake Elmo at (651) 777-5510 Map Date: March 24, 2005 Create by: TKDA ENGINEERS• ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT, SITE PLAN AND VARIANCE FOR A PUBLIC WORKS/PARK MAINTENANCE BUILDING WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has made application for a Conditional Use Permit for a Public Works/Park Maintenance Building in the Public Facility Zoning District, located 10,000 Stillwater Lane, Lake Elmo, Minnesota. The property is generally described as Sunfish Lake Park, 10,000 Stillwater Lane PID 15-029-21-11-0001 WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has made application for a variance to Section 300.07 Subd. 4.M.5.a.1. to allow standing seam metal as a primary exterior surfacing material where other materials are required. WHEREAS, the application was reviewed and recommended for approval by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on March 14, 2005. WHEREAS, the application for a Conditional Use Permit, Site Plan and Variance for a Public Works/Park Maintenance Building, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the recommendations of the Staff were reviewed. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council makes the following findings in regard to the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the standards for Conditional Use Permits specified by Section 300.07 Sub 4.M, Sub 2. C. of the City Code. and is consistent with the findings required by Section 300.06, Subd 4A. NOW, FURTHERMORE, the City Council finds with regard to the requested variance that said variance meets the findings required in Section 300.06 Subd 4A. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION APPROVING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND SITE PLAN FOR A WATER STORAGE TANK WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has made application for a Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan for a water storage tank in the Public Facility Zoning District, located 10,000 Stillwater Lane, Lake Elmo, Minnesota. The property is generally described as Sunfish Lake Park, 10,000 Stillwater Lane PID 15-029-21-11-0001 WHEREAS, the application was reviewed and recommended denial by the Planning Commission at a public hearing on March 14, 2005. WHEREAS, the application for a Conditional Use Permit and site plan for a 500,000 gallon water storage tank, the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and the recommendations of the Staff were reviewed. NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council makes the following findings in regard to the Conditional Use Permit: 1. The Conditional Use Permit is consistent with the standards for Conditional Use Permits specified by Section 300.07, Subd. 4.M.,Sub.2.C. of the City Code, and is consistent with the findings required by Section 200.06, Subd. 4A. NOW, FURTHERMORE, the City Council approves the conditional use permit and site plan for a 500,000 water storage tank in the Public Facility Zoning District located in Sunfish lake Park. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Date: March 10, 2005 for the Meeting of March 14, 2005 Applicant: City of Lake Elmo Location: 10000 Stillwater Blvd. Requested Action: Site Plan, Zoning Variance and Conditional Use Permit Land Use Plan Guiding: PF (Public/Semi Public Facilities) Existing Zoning: PF (Public/Semi Public Facilities Site History and Existing Conditions: The 19.8 acres site was acquired by the City along in the mid 1970's as a part of the land acquisition package for Sunfish Park. While 200+ wooded acres of Sunfish Park have been slowly developed as a passive recreation resource since the acquisition, this portion of the acquisition has been farmed by third parties. Initially this area was farmed for cash crops by the seller without compensation, in accordance with the sales agreement with the City. When the terms of the agreement for rent-free farming expired, the seller declined to continue, and a third party has rented the site for cash crop farming since that time. The site has not been used for park purposes at any time since its acquisition by the City. The site is generally rolling open field, with about 20 vertical feet of topographic relief — with no specific direction of rise/fall. Approximately 6/10 acre of the extreme north periphery of the site is wooded. Discussion and Analysis: The City proposes to construct an XX,XXX square foot Public Works/Park Maintenance facility and a 500,000 water storage tank on the site. As with any applicant on lands zoned PF, the City will require a Conditional Use Permit as a "Facility for Local, County, or State Government". As with all PF uses there are specific conditions included. For this type of the facility those conditions are as follow: 1. Direct access is provided to a Public street classified by the Comprehensive Plan as Maior Collector or Arterial. Via the Park Access Road (not a Public Street), the site has direct access to State Highway 5 — an Arterial. 2. The use and location is consistent with the Community Facilities Element of the Comprehensive Plan. The specific location of public facilities is not addressed by the Community Facilities Element of the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. The Community Facilities Element of the 2000-2020 Plan does very specifically address the need for additional elevated water storage at some location (but not adjacent to any of the wells). The Community Facilities and Staffmg Report - adopted by the City Council in 2002 — addresses the immediate need for new and expanded Public Works/Park Maintenance Facilities for the City — again not specifying any particular site for the new facilities. rl 3. No use may exceed a ratio of 3.0 SAC units per 3.5 acres or 235 gallons per day per net acre of land based on the design capacity of all facilities, whichever is more restrictive. Based on the 300 square feet of office space within the proposed structure, a total of 1 SAC units would be chargeable, based on Metropolitan Council standards. Using a total of maximum of 10 employees that may some day be located at the site, the wastewater generation will not exceed 38 gallons per day per net acre of the site. In both cases the wastewater generation of the site as proposed (or even if some day expanded by several factors) will be well below the maximum thresholds. The Site Plan has been reviewed by Staff, both during its design, andagain as finalized for this application. The Site plan meets or exceeds all Section 520 site plan and PF zoning district standards. In addition thee site plan meets ort exceeds applicable standards of other related City codes. Note that "utility transmission services" are exempt from any zoning ordinance height restrictions. Production and transmission of public water is a utility, and water towers an integral component of the service. The variance requested is from provisions of the PF district standards regarding the exterior surfacing of the Public Works/Park Maintenance building. The City proposes use of standing seam metal exterior surfacing for 85% of the exterior of the structure; and stone surfacing for the balance. The City argues that the Public Interest of preserving Rural Character is best enhanced by use of these materials in a barn motif. The hardship is unique to this site (or any other site in the community) by way of introducing a structure of sizable scale to a neighborhood without imposing a "commercial" appearance. Findings and Recommendations: Staff finds that the applications generally comply with the requirements of the PF district, and other applicable City Codes. The suggested Finding\g regarding ht variance request are unusual, reflecting the unique and non -reoccurring nature of this Public project. Planning Commission Actions Requested: Motions regarding a recommendation regarding the Section 520 Site Plan. PF Conditional Use Permit, and Zoning Variance. Charles E. Dillerud, City Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicants Graphics Location Map R22W R2IW R2OW Vicinity Map 0 2400 Scale in Feet Thb &mingle Ma bm6ota owP6eeon and reproduction of land woofs u May spoof In various WashbBwn Roo*oft" The dostigehaddbewadfo wbnnot only,popovas Wasltrigt. Cy tybnot resportqblo for any Room(W Washington County Surveyors Oboo. PhoIWng661) 4304876 Parool data based atA64WInlotmaeon TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS MEMORANDUM 1500 Piper Jaffrey Piaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com To: Chuck Dillerud Reference: Conditional Use Permit Site Plan Copies To: Public Works/ Water Tower City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota -- --� Comm. No. 13335.000 From: Thomas Prew, P. E . Routing: Date: March 9, 2005 We have prepared a site plan for the planned Public Works Building and Water Tower and have the following comments:' Roads The site lies west of the access drivewayto the parking lot at Sunfish Lake Park. This is not a public street. The driveway is currently, topped with gravel. The Public Works Foreman would like to pave this driveway in the future, but recommends waiting to see how it performs under the loads from larger trucks. A driveway from the public works site to the water tower will be necessary. Septic System A new septic system is planned to serve the building. The set aside area is large enough for both an initial system and a backup system. The soils atlas shows sandy loam soils at this site, which are acceptable for a drain field. An actual site evaluation will be done by the building contractor. All septic system work will be done according to City code. .Drinking Water The site will draw drinking water from the watermain that serves the proposed water tower. Surface Water All surface water from the impervious surfaces at the Public Works site will be infiltrated to reduce the impact to Sunfish Lake Park. The infiltration basins have sufficient volume to contain a 100-year event prior to overtopping. • Soils under the infiltration basins are sandy loam and have a good infiltration capacity. Deep rooted native plantings will be used to help promote infiltration within the basins. RECEIVED An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity March 11, 2005 Mr. Chuck Dillerud City of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 Re: 11051 Stillwater Boulevard Addition Dear Mr. Dillerud: Thank you for submitting the information regarding the proposed addition at 11051 Stillwater Boulevard. On behalf of the Valley Branch Watershed District (VBWD), I have reviewed the information and this letter provides my preliminary comments. Because the project will require a VBWD permit, I will review the project more thoroughly once a VBWD permit application is submitted. Background The project site Iies within the Downs Lake watershed. Downs Lake is relatively small, with a surface area of approximately 35 acres compared to its large tributary watershed of about 2,400 acres. Before ultimately draining to Downs Lake, the site drains to a channel that conveys runoff through the village to a low area around Lion's Park. Water Quality Downs Lake is shallow and has poor water quality. The lake's average summertime Secchi disc transparencies are usually less than 3 feet, and the average summertime total phosphorus and chlorophyll a concentrations are typically quite high. Water Quantity Downs Lake has a high overflow, and there are two homes within the 100-year floodplain of Downs Lake. Over the winter of 2002-2003, the VBWD constructed a project that will draw floodwaters down faster after a flood, but the project will not prevent flooding. As development in the Downs Lake watershed continues, more impervious area will be created, which will cause the volume of stormwater runoff to increase unless infiltration techniques are incorporated into the development. Increases in the stormwater runoff volumes reaching Downs Lake will likely increase the "normal" water level of Downs Lake and the chances of flooding. Proposed Project The proposed project involves adding about 4,000 square feet to the existing building and reconstructing the parking lot. More than 6,000 square feet of new impervious surfaces are proposed, and therefore, a VBWD permit is required. Low Impact Development Techniques Reducing impervious surfaces and encouraging infiltration practices will protect Downs Lake (and all water bodies) from negative water quantity and quality impacts. The VBWD does not currently require that low impact techniques be incorporated into developments, but DAVID BUCHECK LINCOLN FETCHER DONALD SCHEEL DALE BORASH DUANE JOHNSON VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT www.vbwd.org P.O. BOX 838 LAKE ELMO, ,MINNESOTA 55042-0538 Mr. Chuck Dillerud March 11, 2005 Page 2 because the site drains to, the existing floodprone area within the Old Village and eventually to Downs Lake, incorporating low impact development techniques into the site design is strongly encouraged. Some low impact development techniques are being incorporated into the site. It appears that the amount of proposed imperviousness has been limited by only proposing the minimum number of parking stalls required by the City, by constructing each parking stall at a 90- degree angle to the driving isle, by limiting stall dimensions to 9 feet by 18 feet, and by minimizing the width of the accesses to the parking lot to 18 feet. An infiltration basin is being proposed. Additional practices that would encourage more infiltration on this site include: • Constructing the site so that compaction in pervious areas is prevented • Requiring loosing of soils to a depth of 24 inches to a maximum compaction of 85% standard proctor density and tilling the upper 10 inches of soils prior to planting • Directing roof drains to pervious areas • Using pervious areas for snow storage • Planting trees that at maturity will canopy over at least 50% of the impervious surfaces • Planting deep-rooted trees, shrubs, wildflowers, and grasses in at least 25% of the project's green space Peak Discharge Rates Hydrologic modeling information was submitted, but more details and supporting documentation needs to be submitted. The applicant appears to be depending on infiltration to control the discharge rates leaving the site. The infiltration rate assumed is 1 inch per hour, which is high. A slower infiltration rate should be used and/or supporting documentation that justifies that this rate will be sustainable needs to be submitted. Water Quality Treatment The standard stormwater management pond is not being proposed. If the infiltration basin functions as assumed, it will provide runoff treatment. The VBWD requires skimming devices from parking lot runoff. Pretreatment of runoff prior to it entering the infiltration basin would greatly increase the time between needed maintenance. Minimum Floor Elevations The proposed minimum floor elevations appear to be at least two feet above the 100-year flood level of the infiltration pond. The City has recently completed modeling of the channel adjacent to this site. The 100-year flood level of the channel should be compared to the proposed floor elevations. Erosion A temporary rock construction entrance and silt fence are shown on the plans. The stability of the riprap parking lot overflow needs to be reviewed. The outlet of the proposed infiltration basin should be stabilized. If the flow velocities are small and if the flows can be spread out, the erosion potential could be reduced. Wetland Issues The applicant will need to submit a wetland delineation report or proof that no wetlands exist on the site. The VBWD is the Local Government Unit responsible for administrating the Wetland Mr. Chuck Dillerud March 11, 2005 Page 3 Conservation Act. The developer will need to follow all of the rules and regulations of the Wetland Conservation Act, and submit all of the necessary documentation. The VBWD will then review the information, forward the information to the appropriate agencies for comments, and ensure the proposal conforms to the Wetland Conservation Act and other VBWD wetland rules and regulations. Permit Requirements The proposed project will require a permit from the VBWD. The landowner should submit a complete permit application packet to me. Permit application material can be obtained from the VBWD's website, www.vbwd.org, or from me. Once a complete VBWD permit application is submitted, I will review the project for conformance to the VBWD's rules and regulations, including: • Stormwater rates • Water quality treatment • Flood levels and minimum floor elevations • Wetland delineations and protection • Erosion controls • Potential downstream impacts If you have any questions, please contact me at 952-832-2622. Sincerely, Jo lYn P. Hanson, P.E. BARR ENGINEERING COMPANY Engineers for the District c: David Bucheck, VBWD President (via e-mail) Michael Murphy, Larson Engineering of Minnesota, 3524 Labore Road, White Bear Lake, MN 55110 (via mail) Tom Prew, TKDA, City Engineer (via e-mail) • I IWATER TOWER tI • • •1308.80±• • • DRAINFIELD • • =1308.80± • • ✓ ,...•i\n' .....i..••....h..n^✓\._r`.../'�...i�..r`... _r •_• ...h.., ....,.,-..l•....I`^'/�"r _- ""'1....+r /1 GRAVEL it'p rw1� AREA INFILTRATION POND art LAKE LINO CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 BLIC WORKS FACILITY NO. DATE DESIGN DEVELOPMENT ISSUE RECORD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS pKAN. SPECIFICATION. OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED ARCHRECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAM. LID. NO.: DATE zr,----330' TO TKDA E 1/4 COR ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS -PLANNERS • SEC 15 rzint.•�an m..,. lima Marl.rmtswFiw m 4.111'= T29N w R21W DESIGNED RLOIDRAWN CHECKED DMMI RLC CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AREA L2.0 13335-01 r1 8 DRAINFIELD 200.00. 22.00' STORAGE • • :T(2);12'„ OWING, • .". CHAIN UNK FENCE 09.00. 1.::, .•'. :. ".:, ' ''.,„' . !. ,,,, '• '4 I..., ..„131'130C •44, *•:.• „ „ - • • • • ';'g„ • „ -;‘; 0,4 • — • • 4 • „Fliss• '5;tsc. ' • . ";,„, ,*' • 1": LILL—ABM GROUND 4 FUELING STATION. N 4" BY OWNER 7-1 CONC. STOOP, SEE ARCH., TYP. CONC. APRON, SEE ARCH., TIP. " , „, :•`; BOZO' 308.50. n 20.00' CJ'S TYP. CONC. WALK 4" STRIPING OD 50 S6) „ . „ „ „ •-• , I a, I r. • 1... e 1.1, '• I • -r I 73.65' I > I g POY LAKE ELMO Alumememowimplo! CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO, MN 65042 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RECEIV E .5210 DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NO. DATE ISSUE RECORD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: f PRINTED NAme R10HARI3 L. -0130,1; NO.: 16346 DATE: TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS '"`"""" 6n2.Mwe,mnao DESIGNED I DRAWN Dim I CHECKED RLs RLO I SITE PLAN L2.1 0 15 DO .1.11•••••. BO 13335-01 Mom .r•`rr/ f / 'J //i 954 --95a rr/ // // /ram` \. r/r /rr \ \- rrr /rr 9r 9f 230LF-18" RCP 01.0% DRAINFIEL 67.864 r 69.65 72;52 71.90 �2.54t , ./ 88.9. / /%9,54 Nl 68 t88O8 FR()SION AND RFINMFNT (ONTROI NOTFC. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL SEQUENCE THEIR WORK AS FOLLOWS: 1. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND PERIMETER OF ENTIRE SITE PRIOR TO GP/JING OPERATIONS, MAINTAIN THROUGHOUT CONSTRUCTION. 2. INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES. 3. CONSTRUCT TEMPORARY SEDIMENATION BASINS UPSTREAM OF PERMANENT INFILTRATION BASINS AND SEED/MULCH W/ TEMPORARY EROSION CONTROL SEEDING. 4. CONSTRUCT PERM NNENT INFILTRATION IASINS SEO AND SECURE TANi EROSION CONTROL BLANKET. INSTALL SILT FENCE AROUND INFILTRATION BASINS AND AT STORM SEWER INLETS/OUTLETS TO PROTECT INFILTRATION BASINS FROM SILTATION DARING CONSTRUCTION. 5. PERFORM GRADING OPERATIONS. PROVIDE TEMPORARY EROSION AND REMAIN( CONTROL FOR STOCKPILE AREAS DURING CONSTRUCTION. 6. PROVIDE TEMPORARY COVER SEEDING ON ANY AREAS NOT WORKED FOR 21 DAYS ON HATTER THAN 10:1 SLOPES, 14 DAYS ON 10:1 TO 3:1 SLOPES, AND 7 DAIS ON STEEPER THAN 3:1 SLOPES. 7. COMPLETE GRADING OPERATIONS. 8. GRADE TEMPORARY SEDIMENTATION BASIN AREAS TO FINAL GRADE. I. INSTALL PERMANENT EROSION CONTROL (SODDING. SEEDING, MULCHNG, EROSION CONBIOL BLANKET, ETC.) ON ALL AREAS NOT ALREADY COMPLETED WBFI EDAM ALIRF ES7ABUSHMENT. 10, REMOVE SILT FENCE AND ROTC CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCES AFTER TURF IS ESTABUSHED. IC 81 RIM 966,00 INV 981.00 STORAIWATER INFILTRATION BASIN N/ i r- r. r/ N `\ i \ tA ♦ \\ \ \ ! ¶ L \ \\ \ \\ .50\. \111,I71.9'4„ \ \ ` \(. \\\ t� 9661I.•00 (.., \\ \ -- \, \\ \` 4 /f 71. 71.9 T 91.90 T 71. l � 1 70.26 70.2670 20 170.20 ±68 8 971 rf 93E " 9,; [6r H51. 98" 969 970 70.26 7020 969m 967 372 97 70. C`- f / 36 1 1 \ +62 0 15 30 ram. 60 an LAKE ELMO AbubsioramoorloOk CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK TAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RECEIVED DESIGN DEVELOPMENT .1 NO. DATE ISSUE RECORD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNES.TA SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: RI.CF4ARD L LTC. NO.: 18346 AV DATE TKDA ENGINEERS ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS 152.1.3t nn. • 444ue.1n4 ew,wmWI4Ub xm+.ro DESIGNED DRAWN CHECKED RLG DMM RLC GRADING & UTILITY PLAN L2.2 13335-01 1 .00 b®Et! ,.6poomo MIS/1FI 1 ANF011 FLOOR BOX HAND HOLE JUNCTION BOX NOTE, REFERRAL NOTE, REVISION PARTITION POWER WALL BOX POWER POLE PULL BOX CLOCK RECEPTACLE-HUBBELL HBL5235, MOUNT 90" AFF SECURITY/ACCESS CONIR01 ® AUTOMATIC DOOR OPERATOR F[Y BUZZER ▪ CARD READER CHIME CLOSED CIRCUIT CAMERA OO DOOR CONTACTS © ELECTRIC STRIKE • HANDICAP DOOR PUSH-BUTTON ® KEY PAD ® MOTION DETECTOR F "E l SECURITY SIREN • ABBREVIATIONS /3c SYMBOLS ABBREVIATIONS AFF ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR AFG ABOVE FINISHED GRADE BFG BELOW FINISHED GRADE EM EMERGENCY GFI GROUND FAULT INTERRUPTING MT EMPTY TT TELEPHONE TERMINAL BOARD WP WEATHERPROOF X INDICATES EXISTING DEVICE, FIXTURE OR WIRING TO REMAIN UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE COMMUNICATION 4 JACK, DATA ' JACK, DATA/VOICE 1 JACK, TELEPHONE (VOICE) Fe JACK, TELEVISION DFVICFR, FOy CONTROL DEVICE (PL- PILOT UGHT, SS - SELECTOR SWITCH, PB - PUSHBUTTON, ETC, ) NEMA 5-20R, DOUBLE DUPLEX Pa NEMA 5-20R, DUPLEX NEMA 5-20R, CEIUNO MOUNTED l' WIRED 5-20R, DUPLEX, SPLIT Fe NEMA 5-20R SINGLE I4 RECEPTACLE, SPECIAL, NEMA TYPE AS NOTED FO II, IPMENI' O' DISCONNECT SWITCH EQUIPMENT MOTOR MOTOR STARTER, COMBINAION MOTOR STARTER, MAGNETIC MOTOR STARTER, MANUAL PANELBOARD FIRE AI ABM QI AUTOMATIC DETECTOR (S-SMOKE/HEAT, B-BEAM, D-DUCT, F-FIXED TEMP, RR -RATE OF RISE) ® INDIVIDUAL ADDRESSABLE MODULE I'Qp MAGNETIO DOOR HOLDER H:1 MANUAL PULL STATION l'iD1 SPEAKER 041 SPEAKER/STROBE i l STROBE FDA SWITCH, FLOW ©• SWITCH, TAMPER NOTES 1, NUMBERS AT RECEPTACLES AND LUMINAIRES CORRESPOND DIRECTLY WITH PAND.BOARD CIRCUIT NUMBERS AS SCHEDULED. BRANCH CIRCUIT WIRING AND HOMERUNS ARE NOT SHOWN FOR CLARIY. ACCURATE AS -BUILT (WIRED) INFORMATION IS TO BE PROVIDED AT THE PROJECT COMPLENON, TYPICAL THROUGHOUT. MATERIALSRTEANDINSTALLONS ATION REQUIREMENTS, 2, CIRCUITS SUPPLYING NON -LINEAR LOADS, PAIRED WITH VOICE/DATA OUTLETS, SHALL HAVE DEDICATED NEUTRALS, 3. RACEWAYS SHALL CONTAIN A GROUNDING CONDUCTOR. 4, 20 AMP CIRCUIT CONDUCTOR SHALL ) FNOTH FOAWOOWS: 755' 12 '-116' 10 116'-160' 8 >150' 6 5, SWITCHES SHALL BE MOUNTED PER ADA REQUIREMENTS. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, RECEPTACLES AND TELECOMMUNICATION OUTLETS IN UNFINISHED AREAS SHALL BE MOUNTED 2'-0" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR. UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, RECEPTACLES AND TELECOMMUNICATION OUTLETS IN FINISHED AREAS SHALL BE MOUNTED 1'-6" ABOVE FINISHED FLOOR, 6, SEE REIATED PLUMBING AND HVAC DRAWINGS FOR LOCATION OF PLUMBING AND HVAC EQUIPMENT REQUIRING ELECTRICAL CONNECTIONS, COORDINATE INTERCONNECTION REQUIREMENTS WITH EQUIPMENT SHOP DRAWINGS. 7, ALL CONDUIT AND WIRE BETWEEN FIXTURES, SWITCHES AND/OR RECEPTACLES SHALL BE a, EXPOSED IN UNFINISHED AREAS. b, CONCEALED ABOVE SUSPENDED CEILINGS, IN WALLS IN FINISHED AREAS, AND EXTERIOR WALLS, 8. SITE IJGHINC TO INCLUDE DARK SKY CUTOFF OPTICS, FIXTURE SCHEDULE; A AREA UGHINO UNIT WITH TES DISTRIBUTION TYPE AS NOTED, 40OW HPS, LAMP AND S►I1ART AND 40' (ABOVE GRADE) DIRECT BURIAL CONCRETE POLE; GE DIMENSION DMY AND SKY CAST TYPE XXX STANDARD. S WALKWAY LIGHTING BOLLARD WITH DOWN AND OUT CUTOFF DISTRIBUTION, 70W HPS LAMP AND MI AsT AND 42" (ABOVE GRADE) DIRECT BURIAL CONCRETE STANDARD; SKY CAST TYPE XXX, LIGHTING EMERGENCY UGHT EXIT LIGHT, CE1UN0 LUMINAIRE, CEILING LUMINAIRE, EM (1/2 SHADING) LUMINAIRE, FLUORESCENT LUMINAIRE, FLUORESCENT -DIRECTIONAL AS INDICATED BY ARROW LUMINAIRE, WALL MOUNT LUMINAIRE, WALL WASH LUMINAIRE TYPE AND CIRCUIT / OCCUPANCY SENSOR-MYTECH OMNI DT200 OR EQUAL, SENSOR TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH RELAY PANELS. PHOTOCELL SWITCH, DIMMER SWITCH, SINGLE GANG ONE POLE (2-2 POLE, 3-3WAY, 4-4WAY MC -MOMENTARY CONTACT, K-KEY, OS-OCCUPANCT SENSOR, P-PILOT) 0 15 30 60 1 "r30' CRT of LAKE *ELMO CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RECEIVED DESIGN DEVELOPMENT t .1 NO. DATE !ISSUE RECORD 1 HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: .1€ Bucks LTC, NO.: - 8E43 DATE: TKDA ENGINEERS •ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS , I 1 w, a of I.. ,I,. II, I III .Liu, I., Ju nLL DESIGNED DRAWN I CHECKED JEB I JEB I JFD ELECTRICAL SITE PLAN EO.2 13335-01 M V' 0 oR LLV 4 q 1g2 0 (5) TAMARACK 13 01Y CANNON NANF 5 RED MAPLE 1 OHIO BUCKEYE 8 RIVER BIRCH 5 TAMARACK 11 SWAMP WHITE OAK 3 BUR OAK 2 RED OAK 6 SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY 8 THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORN 3 RED SPLENDOR CRAB 3 SPRING SNOW CRAB of 18 ANNABELLE HYDRANGEA 18 PIERLTTE PAVEMENT ROSE n 12 RED TWIGGED DOGWOOD 0 pE 9 NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM 12 SMOOTH SUMAC 11 STAGHORN SUMAC 11 WHIT PINE 20 RED PINE •j 9 18 WHITE SPRUCE 'A g 4y INFILTRATION BASIN (3) VP �yrrr, (9) WHITE SPRUCE (7) WHRE SPRUCE DRAINFIELD (2) RED OAK PLANT SCHEDULE SSIORIF10 NAME ACER RUBRUM AESCULUS GLABRACELTIS OCCIDENTAUS BETULA NIGRA L RIX LAMINA QUERCUS BICOLOR QUERCUS MACROCARPA QUERCUS RUBRA AMEUNCHIER CANADENSIS CRATAEOUS CRUS-GALL VAR. INERMIS MALUS 'RED SPLENDOR' MAI.US 'SPRING SNOW' HYDRANGEA ARBORESCENS 'ANABELLE' ROSA 'PIERETTE PAVEMENT' CORNUS SERICEA UREA' VIBURNUM LENTA00 RHOS GLABRA RHUS TYPHINA PIOUS S,ROBUS PIOUS RESIN05A PICEA GIAUCA SIZE B&B 21S" B&B 2X" B&B 2" B&B 6' B&8 2 1i" B&B 2 X" B&B 21¢" B&B 6' B&B 2' B&B 2" B&B 2' POT 18' POT 18" POT 24' POT 24' POT 24" POT 24" B&B 8' B&B 8' 8&B 6' C_ 41. 00 OThomb murulipw rim 10, I// % O (9) NANNYBERRY VIBURNUM PLACE MIN. 3' STRIP SOD NEXT TO ALL GRAVEL/PAVED AREAS. TYP. ®I (19) RED PINE (12) RED TWIGGED DOCWDO0r (3) RED SPLENDOR CRAB (3) SPRING SNOW CRAB 50D (1) OHIO BUCKEYE (3) WH11E PINE ,B) MNABB.LE HYDRANGEA (3) SHADBLOW SEROCEBERRY (3) SHADBLOW SERVICEBERRY (8) RED PINE 2 11MES DIAMETER OF ROOT BALL. (12) SMOOTH SUMAC (1) BUR OAK DO NOT PRUNE MAIN LEADER PRUNE DEAD OR DAMAGED FOLIAGE SET TREE GRADE AT SAME GRADE AS IN NURSERY 8' SHREDDED BARK MULCH. (4' MIN. DIA. CIRCLE) RECESS MULCH AT TRUNK. SOIL SAUCER: 3' MIN. SCARIFY EDGES OF HOLE. CUT STRINGS AND FOLD BACK TOP 1/3 OF BURLAP SACK. REMOVE TOP 1/3 OF WIRE BASKET AFlER SETTING TREE IN DESIRED LOCATION. WELL AERATED TOPSOIL BACKF)LL MIX AS SPECIFIED. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL ROOTFIRMLY L. 0055S NOT SINK 0R SHIFT. NOTE: 1. D0 NOT ALLOW AIR POCKET TO FORM WHEN BACK FIWNG, 2, DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE THE TREE AT PLSNHNO. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. / 1 TYPICAL DECIDUOUS TREE DETAIL L23 (5) THORNLESS COCKSPUR HAWTHORNE INFILTRATION BASIN (11) STAGHORN SUMAC D SOD 0 NI INFILTRATION BAST `�•I E, (5) RNER BIRCH ONC. W,' <, -4 ( NO 2) RED MAPLE . L Oak 1111, Rommusei J (18) PIERERE PAVEMENT ROSE, (1 BUR OAK (11) SWAMP WHITE 04K MOW UNE, TYP. 4 0 ' 1 er:^406100 (1) BUR OAK D0 NOT CUT MAIN LEADER SET TREE PLUMB: STAKING PRUNE DAMAGED FOLIAGE ONLY..----.,�� AND GUYING OPTIONAL (7) RED PINE GROUND UNE TO BE THE SAME AS AT NURSERY. 5' SHREDDED BARK MULCH, (3' MINIMUM DIAMETER CIRCLE.) RECESS MULCH BY TRUNK CUT STRINGS do FOLD BURLAP BACK. FERTIUZE AS NECESSARY. SUBGRADE 12' MIN, PLANTING SOIL• SCARIFY PLANTING PIT WALLS AND BOTTOM. TYPICAL CONIFEROUS m�L TREE DETAIL (3) WHITE PINE (5) RED PINE (5) WNRE PINE Itr, 1 —J 10 0 15 30 1 "R30 60 NOTES: 1. PLACE 6' TOPSOIL ON ALL DISTURBED AREAS EXCEPT IN INFILTRATION BASINS, 2. PLACE SOD WHERE SHOWN ON PLANS AND IN 3' WIDE MINIMUM STRIP AROUND ALL GRAVEL & PAVED AREAS. 3. SEED INFILTRATION BASINS WITH MNDOT SPEC 3878, MIXTURE 25B, SECURE WITH ,MNDOT SPEC 3885, EROSION CONTROL BLANKET, CATEGORY 2, STRAW1S. 4. SEED ALL OTHER AREAS WITH MNDOT SPEC 3576, MIXTURE 30B-WF. PRUNE DEAD OR -DAMAGED FOUAGE; .. MAINTAIN NATURAL FORM OF PLVIT. SET TREE GRADE AT SAME GRADE AS IN NURSER(. 4" SHREDDED BARK MULCH THROUGHOUT ENTIRE PLANTING BED. DO N01 ALLOW MULCH TO COME I WITFI TRUNK. SCARIFY ROOT BALL TO PREVENT BINDING. WELL AERATED TOPSOIL BACKFTLL MIX AS SPECIFIED. TAMP SOIL AROUND ROOT BALL BASE FIRMLY WRH FOOT SO ROOT BALL DOES NOT SINK OR SHIFT. - NOTE: 1. D0 NOT ALLOW AIR POCKETS TO FORM WHEN BACK FILLING, 2. DO NOT HEAVILY PRUNE AT PLANTING. SEE SPECIFICATIONS. TYPICAL SHRUB DETAIL 1 5000 - LAKE ELMO CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO, MN 65042 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY DESIGN DEVELOPMENT .I .I, ,I NO. DATE ISSUE RECORD HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PLAN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY LICENSED LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNE50TA PRWTEDNAME: RICHARD L. GRAY // . LTC. NO.: 18346 DATE: %/' /G) " SIGNATURE: TKDA ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS_ 05 �:r e— N1EM.e61N, APM, NNw1Y4tM0 nn..S5I ]0E'1 a�"e.m _- - Iw9�oim6li. u l .I ii V I6� I n. DESIGNED 'DRAWN CHECKED RLGI OMM RLG LANDSCAPE PLAN L2.3 13335-01 a. Ia g 6 L ADD ALTERNATE 12 VEHICLE STORAGE FUTURE P-Ott23-0 COM, STOOP SEE STRUCT. CONC. SEE Ma, 140-0* • 2r-tr ------- -TTT 4-1:1 ------------ ADD &TERM 3 V9410LE SAME CONC, STOOP SEE STRUM 115-0 t; A "—TRENCH DRAINI—N FLOOR PLAN A2.1 0 4 B 16 2.1.4 7E4 N -V CONC. v I ink e-4* 1 r 1 a 1 —CONC, STOOP SEE STRUCT APRON SEE STRUM. — --CONC. FILLED STEEI. BOLLARD PAINTED SAFTEP yam Tit SEE STRUCT, LAKE ELMO Anwomois.sompf CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH lAn PARK LADE ELMO, MN 55092 PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY RECEIVED DESIGN DEVELOPMENT NO. DATE ISSUE RECORD I HUSBY CERTIFY THAT MIS MAK SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME OR UNDER W DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT 1 AM A DULY UCEHSED ARCHRECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME: .1tintrA Ift, OLSEN VC. NO. .4E7E3 PATE: TKDA. ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS FLOOR PLAN A2.1 13335-01 It IMMO NISI RIMS it MOM ' 110.11:4111111111.0.511%.101.111-1101,11111.11.103.1.111,111111.M.4 .nr1211 Min ossnmoortnwatator DEDUCT ALTERNATE 1_ CLERESTDRY w/ WINDOWS D — WIL: WALL PANEL-- L. (BURCANDAY) (71 EAST ELEVATION D 4 B ip 11 1111111111111111111IIIIIIIIIIII 1111111 .1 .1 I I II I I I I I I I I I 1 I I II 111111111 Ili ID It Vag II 1111 .1110.01,411110. 411.110.1 .•VIS go, NORTH ELEVATION 0 4 Li SEANDIcfmr WEL CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO, Mt155042 FCC CE1 V E. DESIGN DEVELOPMENT I HERENY CERTWY ThAT 1fHS PUN, SPECIFICATION, DR REPORT WAS PEEPN1ED BY HE ON UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISIONSUPEBVISIGN M40 THAT 1 AM A DULY LENSED ARCHITECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: pfunrmo home THERPA U. OLSEN LIC. NO4 40793 ENGINEERS -ARCHFTECTS• PLANNERS ""`"" DESIGNED DRAWN TAO CHECKED BASE BID EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 13335-01 LAKE ELM 0 I I i I I I I I I I I I I I i' cts\g—m VokeElmo \ 13335_000\a WEST ELEVATION 0 4 8 1,6 1 /8".1 -0" IIIIIIIIi SOUTH ELEVATION I I I I I I I I I I I I I CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH LAKE PAW LAKE ELMO, M090042 RECEIVEC DESIGN DEVELOPMENT DATE ISSUE RECORD I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS PUN, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED DT ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I MI A DULY LICENSED ARCHRECT UNDER THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF MINNESOTA SIGNATURE: PRINTED NAME T'iERESA M. °ISM LID. ND: 40793 "ATE: • ENGINEERS•ARCHITECTS•PLANNERS - DESIGNED DRAWN •ICHECKED I BASE BID i T110 ' EXTERIOR ELEVATIONS 13335-01 BUILDING SECTION D 48 16 1/6"—i'—o" II 1 I I I I 1 1 1 I I 1 I 1 I I 1,1 I 1 I I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ' I I 1 I I I I I 1 IIIIII ' 1 1 1 II I 1 1 5 g g I I 1 I 1 I I I I I I I I 1 ill " I MAINTENANCE VEHICLE ST & LUC 1LJLJLJLJ BUILDING SECT ON 1 Of CITY OF LAKE ELMO SUNFISH WE PARR ME ELMO. MR 56042 PU C K DATE FACIL RECEIVED DESIGN DEVELOPMENT UE RECORD I HEREBY CER11FY THAT THIS KATT, SPECIFICATION, OR REPORT WAS PREPARED BY ME CR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY UCENSED ARCHITECT UNDER 1HE LAW s DF 7HE STATE OF MINNESOTA SzGRANAE: PRINTED 1,1,WE: niEBPA OLSEN LIG NO: 40793 "ATE: ENGINEERS •ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS Itrratv— .1.11 Law ItamiR 65 GEED TARO DRAWN BUILDING SECTIONS 13335-01 Lake Elmo Agenda Section: CITY ENGINEER'S REPORT No 8C. City Council April 5, 2005 flpda Item: Resolution Awarding Bid for Phase I of the Water System Interconnect Project Background Information for April 5, 2005: In his letter dated March 24, 2005, the City Engineer reported bids were opened on February 18., 2005 for this project. The City Engineer recommends awarding the contract to the lowest bidder. Chris Riley Utilities, Inc, for their bid of $348,626.18. Action Items: Motion: . Second , to adopt Resolution No. 2005- ., A Resolution Awarding the bid for the Phase I of the Water System Interconnect Project to Chris Riley Utilities in the amount of $348,626.18. Attachments: Letter from Tom Prew dated March 24, 2005 Resolution 2005 Award Bid Person responsible: T.Prew CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION AWARDING THE BID FOR PHASE I OF THE WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT PROJECT WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Phase I Water Systems Interconnect Project, bids were received, opened and tabulated according to law, and the attached bids were received complying with the advertisement: Low Bidder Chris Riley Utilities, Inc Total Amount of Alternate Bid $348,626.18 AND WHEREAS, Chris Riley Utilities, Inc. is the lowest responsible bidder. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA: The Mayor and Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a contract with Chris Riley Utilities in the name of the City of Lake Elmo for Phase I of the Water System Interconnect Project, according to the plans and specifications therefore approved by the City Council and on file in the office of the City Clerk. 2. The City Clerk is herby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next lowest bidder shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council this 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator RFCELVE March 24, 2005 ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS Honorable Mayor and City Council City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re: Award Bid Water Systems Interconnect Phase I City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota TKDA Commission No. 13186.000.002 Dear Mayor and City Council: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Bids were opened on February 18, 2005 for Phase I of the Water System Interconnect Project. There was a base bid and an alternate bid was received. The base bid was to install standard ductile iron pipe (DIP) with open cut methods. The alternate bid was to install high density polyethylene pipe (HDPE) by directional drilling it into place. Directional drilling allows us to install the pipe with very little surface disturbance. Both methods are acceptable for this portion of the project. We bid this project two ways in order for the City to receive the best price for the work. The low bidder, Chris Riley Utilities has supplied references, which have been checked. They would install the HDPE pipe by directional drilling. Their bid is well under our estimate for this phase of the project. The single easement we need has been acquired. City Council Action Requested Approve the enclosed Resolution awarding the bid to Chris Riley Utilities in the amount of $348,626.18.00 Thomas Prew, P. E. City Engineer TDP:arw Enclosure An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity TABULATION OF BIDS - BY LOWEST PRICE WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT - PHASE I CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.000 BIDS OPENED: FEBRUARY 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT CHRIS RILEY UTILITIES UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT RICHARD KNUTSON UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS- PLANNERS ELLINGSON DRAINAGE UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 3 CLEAR TREE AND GRUB STUMP 7 EA $ 500.00 $ 3,500.00 - $ _ 4_ REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 572 SY $ 3.50 $ 2,002.00 $ - $ 5 SAW CUT BIT, PAVEMENT 370 LF $ 3.00 $ 1,110.00 $ $ 6 PATCH BIT ROADWAY 4" THICK 572 SY $ 25.00 $ 14,300.00 $ - $ 7 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 175 LF $ 20.00 $ 3,500.00 - $ - $ 8 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP FES 4 LF $ 200.00 $ 800,00 $ - $ 9 SEEDING, INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 16,500 SY $ 3,00 $ 49,500.00 $ - $ 10 SODDING TYPE LAWN 11 CI..-5 FOR DRIVEWAY 6" DEPTH 12 BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 13CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 14 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 15 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 16 16" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 17 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX -- 18 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 19 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 20 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 21 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS TOTAL BASE BID - 1,633 SY $ 4.00 $ 6,532.00 $ - 493 TN $ 11.00 $ 5,423.00 $ _ .. 154 TN $ 35.00 $ 5,390,00 $ - 1 EA $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ - 42 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 15 LF $ 30.00 $ 450.00 _ 6,649 LF $ 40.00 $ 265,960.00 $ 6 EA $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 1 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 4 EA $ 2,000,00 $ 8,000.00 $ 6 EA $ 2,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 4,109 LB $ 4.00 $ 16,436.00 $ ..,.. , ... 9,300,00 $ 9,300.00 $ 2,000,00 $ 2,000.00 $ 500.00 $ 3,500,00 $ 2.50 $ 1,430.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 20,60 $ 11,783.20 $ 24.25 $ 4,243.75 $ 375,00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1.20 $ 19,805:00 $ . _ $ 2.75 $ 4C490.75 $ _. $ 12.75 $ 6,285.75 $ $ 42.50 $ 6,545.00 $ $ 1,500,00 $ 1,500.00 $ $ 32.50 $ 1,365.00 $ $ 41.50 $ 622.50 $ $ 38.10 $ 253,326.90 - _ _ $ $ 628.00 $ 3,768.00 $ $ 861.00 $ 861.00 $ $ 1,991,00 $ 7,964.00 $ $ 2,016.00 $ 12,096.00 4.00 $ 16,436.00 $ 428,053.00 $ 370,667.85 $ ALTERNATE BID _ I .__. 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 20,000.00 $ 20,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 14,800.00 $ 14,800.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 2 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT ...... 210 SY $ 3.50 $ 735.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 2.50 $ 525.00 $ 2.38 $ _ 499.80 3 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 75 LF $ 3.00 $ 225.00 $ 1.00 $ 75.00 $ 5,00 $ 375.00 $ 3.00 $ 225.00 4 PATCH BIT. PAVEMENT 4" THICK 210 SY $ 25.00 $ 5,250,00 $ 18,00 $ 3,780.00 $ 8.00 $ 1,680.00 $ 7,00 $ 1,470.00 5 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 70 LF $ 20.00 $ 1,400,00 $ 12.00 $ 840.00 $ 24.25 $ 1,697.50 $ 5.00 $ 350.00 6 SEEDING, INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 900 SY $ 3.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 1.50 $ 1,350,00 $ 5,95 $ 5,355.00 $ 2,35 $ 2,115,00 7 .SODDI-NG TYPE LAWN 8 ,CL-5 9 'BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 10 CONNECT TO EXIST, WATERMAIN 11 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 12 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN --_ 13 DIR. DRILL 16" (DIPIHDPE DR 17 14 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX _15 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 16 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 17 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 18 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 19 TYPE LV-3 BIT. NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE 20 TYPE LV-4 BIT. WEAR COURSE MIX 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 22 TOPSOIL BORROW 23 SODDING TOTAL ALTERNATE BID 200 SY $ 4.00 $ 800.00 $ 2.50 $ 500,00 $ 11.28 $ 2,256.00 $ 4.00 $ 800.00 30 TN $ 11.00 $ 330.00 $ 9.00 $ 270.00 $ 18.75 $ 562.50 $ 25.00 $ 750.00 154 TN $ 35.00 $ 5,390.00 $ 50.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 42.50 $ 6,545,00 $ 50.00 $ 7,700.00 1 EA $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,2()0.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 _42 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,050.00 $ 33.82 $ 1,420.44 $ 32.50 $ 1,365.00 $ 28.00 $ 1,176.00 15 LF $ 30.00 $ 450.00 $ 45.86 $ 687.90 $ 41.50 $ 622.50 $ 29.50 $ 442.50 6,649 LF $ 55,00 $ 365,695.00 $ 40.48 $ 269,151.52 $ 67.00 $ 445,483.00 $ 44.25 $ 294 218 25 6 EA $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 - $ 888.42 $ 5,330.52 $ 2,078,00 $ 12,468.00 $ 750.00 $ 4,500,00 1 EA $ 900.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,179,32 $ 1,179.32 $ 2,286.00 $ 2,286.00 $ 960.00 $ 960.00 4 EA $ 2,000,00 $ 8,000.00 $ 2,610.91 $ 10,443.64 _ $ 3,341.00 $ 13,364.00 $ 6,150.00 $ 24,600.00 6__ _EA $_ ?floo.po $ 12,000.00 $ 2,720.14 $ 16,320.84 $ 3,266.00 $ 19,596.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 18,000.00 4,109_ LB $ 4.00 $ 16,436.00 $ 3.00 $ 12,327.00 $ 4,00 $ 16,436.00 $ 3.75 $ 15,408.75 0 TN $ - $ $ - $ $ - $ - . 0 TN $ - $ _ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 50.00 $ 6 GA $ - $ - $ $ - $ $ 3.00 $ _ _ . 0 CY $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ 25.00 $ 0 SY $ - $ $ - $ $ 3.50 $ $ 447,561.00 $ 3,18,626.18 $ 546,916.50 ' $ 384,415.30 Page 1 TABULATION OF BIDS - BY LOWEST PRICE WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT - PHASE I CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.000 BIDS OPENED: FEBRUARY 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BURCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION FRONTIER PIPELINE FRIEDGES CONTRACTING CO. NORTHDALE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ $ 12,665.63 $ 12,665.63 $ 18,617.50 $ 18,617.50 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL LS $ 2,500.00 $ 2,500.00 $ $ 2,272,14 $ 2,272.14 $ 13,110,00 $ 13,110.00 3 CLEAR TREE AND GRUB STUMP 7 EA $ 300.00 $ 2,100.00 $ $ 125.71_ $ 879.97 $ 375.00 $ 2,625.00 4 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 572 SY $ 5.00 $ 2,860.60 $ $ 3,10 $ 1,773.20 $ 10.50 $ 6,006.00 5 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 370 LF $ 5.00 $ 1,850.00 $ - $ 5,16 $ 1,909.20 $ 5.50 $ 2,035.00 6 PATCH BIT ROADWAY 4" THICK 572 SY $ 38.00 $ 21,736.00 $ $ 36.15 $ 20,677.80 $ 34.85 $ 19,934.20 7 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 175 LF $ 20.00 $ 3,500.00 $ $ 18.76 $ 3,29837:0080 $$ 7283:0500 $ 300.00$ 4,112.50 B REMOVE & REPLACE CMP FES 4 LF $ 100.00 $ 400.00 $ $ 24.27 $ 9 SEEDING, INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 16,500 SY $ 1.30 $ 21,450.00 $ . $ 1.19 $ 19,635.00 $ 1.29 $ 21,285.00 SY $ 10 SODDING TYPE LAWN 1,6332.25 $ 3,674.25 $ - $ 2.48 $ 4,049.84 $ 3.10 $ 5.062.30 11 CL-5 FOR DRIVEWAY 6" DEPTH 493 TN $ 15.00 $ 7 395.00 $ - $ 16.78 $ 8,272.54 $ 16.55 $ 8,159.15 , 12 BIT, PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 154 TN $ 52.00 $ 8,008.00 $ . $ 44,41 $ 6,839.14 $ 45.69 $ 7036.26 1,800.00' 13 CONNECT TO EXIST, WATERMAIN 1 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 1,500.00 $ -667.19 $ 1,800.00 $ 879.06 $ _ 26.95 $ 1,131.90 14 5" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 42 LF $ 25.00 $ 1,050.00 - 15 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 15 LF $ 27.00 $ 405.00 $ _ $ 667.192- 29783 $$$ $ 371.70 $ 28.44 $ 426.60 6,649 16 16" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN LF $ 40.00 $ 265,960.00 $ - $ 42.15 $ 280,255.35 " $ 41.62 $ 276,731.38 17 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE& BOX 6 EA $ 700.00 $ 4,200.00 $ - $ 671.36 $ 4,028.16 $ 687.15 $ 4,122.90 18 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX _ 1 EA $ 800.00 $ 800.00 $ - $ 875.82 $ 875.82 $ 885.11 $ 885.11 19 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 4 EA $ 1,600.00 $ 6,400.00 $ _ $ 1,687.88 $ 6,751,52 $ 1,865.16 $ 7,460.64 20 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 6 EA $ 1,800.00 $ 10,800.00 $ $ 2,148.37 $ 12,890.22 ' $ 2,165.05 $ 12,990.30 21 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ 3.50 $ 14,381.50 $ - $ 4.04 $ 16,600.36 $ 4.84 $ 19,887.56 TOTAL BASE F310 ,ALTERNATE BID $ 384,469.75 405,673.92 $ 433,719.30 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 10,000.00 $ 10,000,00 $ 30,000.00 $ 30,000.00 2 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 210 SY $ 5.00800$$ 1,050.00 $ 1.00 $ 210.00 8,262.33 $ 8,262.33 $ 5.16 $ 1,078743:6708 $ 3 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 75 LF $ 375.00 $ 1.00 $ 75.00 $ __ 4 PATCH BIT. PAVEMENT 4" THICK 210 SY $ 420.00 $ 10,33 $ $ 85.00 $ 17,850.00 $ 2.00 $ 77.46 $ 16,266.60 $ 5 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 70 LF $ 40.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 18.76 $ 1,313.20 - $ _ 6 SEEDING INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 7 SODDING TYPE LAWN 900 SY $ 1.50 $ 1,350.00 $ 2.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 2.45 $ 2,205.00 " $ 200 SY $ 3.00 600.00 8 CL-5 30 TN $ 1200 $ . . , . $ 40.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 360.00 $ 37$ ___ 9 BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 154 TN $ 65.00 $ 10,010.00 $ 54.00 $ 8,316.00 $ 51.64'96$ 1 $7:691532,9586$ 10 .... CONNECT TO EXIST, WATERMAIN 667.19 6,649 EA $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 $ 667.19 $ LF $ 200.00 $ 8,400.00 $ LF $ 250.00 $ 3,750.00 $ 42.00 $ 1,764.00 $ 42.00 $ 630.00 $ 20.93 $ 24,78 $ 879.06 $ $ $ 12 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 42 1 1:1' .... DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 15 fe 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 6 4 1 EA $ 1,800.00 $ 1,800.00 $ 500.00 $ EA $ 1,700.00 $ 10,200.00 $ 500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 711.28 $ 4,26 7.68 LF $ 70.00 $ 465,430.00 $ 47.00 $ 312,503.00 $ 500.00 $ 915.73 $ _..... 70.62 $ 469,552.38 371.70 915.73 L 13 'DIR. DRILL 16" DIP) HOPE DR 17 EA $ 2,600.00 $ 10,400.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 3,200.52 $ 12,802.08 $ $ $ 14 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 15 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 17 6" HYDRANT (7.-6BURY) _ 6 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 19,200.00 $ 1,785.00 $ 10,710.00 $ 2,213.23 $ 13,279,38 $ 18 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ 3.75 $ 15,408.75 $ 2.25 $ 9,245.25 $ 9,91 $ 40,720.19 - ---- $ 19 TYPE LV-3 BIT. NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE 0 TN $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ , $ 20 TYPE LV-4 BIT, WEAR COURSE MIX 0 TN $ - $ - $ - $ ____. . ._ . $ - $ . $ 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT - $ $ - $ - $ _ 22 TOPSOIL BORROVV 0 CY $ - $ $ - $ $ _ $ $ _ _ 23 SODDING 0 SY $ - $ $ - $ _ $ - $ $ TOTAL ALTERNATE BID _ . 584,823.75 - $ 388,933.25 $ 585,628.23 " Page 2 TABULATION OF BIDS - BY LOWEST PRICE WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT - PHASE I CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.000 BIDS OPENED: FEBRUARY 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION GM CONTRACTING UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS 3 CLEAR TREE AND GRUB STUMP 7 EA 4 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 572 SY 5 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 370 LF 6 PATCH BIT ROADWAY 4" THICK 572 SY 7 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 8 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP FES 9 SEEDING, INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER,BLANKET 10 SODDING TYPE LAWN 11 CL-5 FOR DRIVEWAY 6" DEPTH 12 BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 13 CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 14 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 15 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 16 16" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 6,649 LF 6 EA 175 LF 4 LF 16,500 SY 1,633 SY 493 TN 154 TN 1 EA 42 LF 15 LF 17 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 18 8" RES, SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 19 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 20 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 21 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS TOTAL BASE BID .ALTERNATE BID 1 !MOBILIZATION 2 'REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT, PAVEMEN 3 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 4 PATCH BIT. PAVEMENT 4" THICK 5 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 6 SEEDING, INCL, SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 7 SODDING TYPE LAWN 8 !CL-5 9 'BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH EA EA 4,109 LB 10 CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 11 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 12 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 13 DIR. DRILL 16" (DIP) HDPE DR 17 14 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX I 15 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 16 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 17 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 18 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 19 TYPE LV-3 BIT. NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE 20 TYPE LV-4 BIT, WEAR COURSE MIX 21 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 22 _ TOPSOIL BORROW 23 SODDING 210 SY 75 LF 210 SY 70 LF $ 22.15 $ 1,550.50 900 SY $ 1.24 $ 1,116.00 200 SY $ 2,06 $ 412.00 30 TN $ 17.32 $ 519.60 154 TN $ 66.95 $ 10,310.30 1 EA $ 3,656.23 $ 3,656.23 42 LF $ 80.39 $ 3,376.38 15 LF $ 85.88 $ 1,288.20 6,649 LF $ 48.55 $ 322,808.95 6 EA $ 1,474.03 $ 8,844.18 1 EA $ 1,694.11 $ 1,694.11 4 EA $ 4,634.00 $ 18,536.00 6 EA $ 3,944,34 $ 23,666.04 $ 4,109 LB $ 3.00 $ 12,327.00 $ 0 TN $ 150,00 $ - TN $ 150.00 $ GA $ 5.00 $ CY $ 30.00 $ SY., .._..... 10.U0 ,$. THREE RIVERS CONSTRUCTION PARK CONSTRUCTION CO. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 515.00 $ 515.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 231.75 $ 1,622.25 2.13 $ 1,218.36 3.00 $ 1,110.00 29.41 $ 16,822.52 27.75 $ 4,856.25 239.38 $ 957.52 2.09 $ 34,485.00 3.36 $ 5,486.88 16.68 $ 8,223.24 43.78 $ 6,742.12 744.38 $ 744.38 40.45 $ 1,698.90 44.39 $ 665.85 46.05 $ 306,186.45 $ 693.82 $ 4,162.92 $ 952.94 $ 952.94 $ 1,876.99 $ 7,507.96 2,264.68 $ 13,588.08 4.53 $ 18,613.77 441,160.39 ENGINEERS , ARCHITECTS - PLANNERS FF JEDLICKI UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 21,850.00 $ 21,850.00 $ 19,000.00 $ 19,000.00 750,00 $ 750.00 $ 2,900.00 $ 2,900.00 250.00 $ 1,750.00 $ 485.00 $ 3,395.00 1.75 $ 1,001.00 $ 4.00 $ 2,288.00 2.84 $ 1,050.80 $ 5.00 $ 1,850.00 21.23 $ 12,143.56 $ 22.00 $ 12,584.00 14.55 $ 2,546.25 $ 31.00 $ 5,425.00 284.57 $ 1,138,28 $ 390.00 $ 1,560,00 1.80 $ 29,700.00 $ 1.50 $ 24,750.00 3.35 $ 5,470.55 $ 2.50 $ 4,082.50 7.09 $ 3,495.37 $ 20.00 $ 9,860.00 42,50 $ 6,545.00 $ 83.00 $ 12,782.00 1,290.04 $ 1,290.04 $ 8,250.00 $ 8,250.00 48.61 $ 2,041.62 $ 29.00 $ 1,218.00 47.34 $ 710.10 $ 33.00 $ 495.00 43.11 $ 286,638.39 $ 61.00 $ 405,589.00 904.73 $ 5,428.38 $ 850.00 $ 5,100.00 1,160.73 $ 1,160.73 $ 1,050.00 $ 1,050.00 2,814.69 $ 11,258.76 $ 2,400.00 $ 9,600,00 3,331.04 $ 19,986.24 $ 1,950.00 $ 11,700.00 6,31 $ 25,927.79 $ 6.00 $ 24,654.00 441,882.86 22,000.00 $ 22,000.00 $ 2,811.90 $ 2,811.90 $ 22,300.00 $ 22,300.00 4.02 $ 844.20 $ 2.08 $ 436.80 $ 1.39 $ 291.90 5.00 $ 375.00 $ 3.00 $ 225.00 $ 2.39 $ 179.25 28.33 $ 5,949,30 $ 14.18 $ 2,977.80 $ 7.85 $ 1,648.50 23.25 $ 1,627.50 $ 13.05 $ 913.50 1.74 $ 1,566.00 $ 2.15 $ 1,935.00 3.87 $ 774.00 $ 3.00 $ 600.00 16.68 $ 500.40 $ 8.05 $ 241.50 43,78 $ 6,742,12 $ 45.70 $ 7,037.80 721.88 $ 721.88 $ 972.54 $ 972.54 44.39 $ 1,864.38 $ 41.40 $ 1,738.80 54.19 $ 812.85 $ 40.81 $ 612.15 81.34 $ 540,829.66 __$ 54,40 $ 361,705.60 693.82 $ 4,162.92 $ 722.59 $ 4,335.54 952.94 $ 952,94 $ 905.35 $ 905.35 3,217.85 $ 12,871.40_ $ 1,844.33 $ 7,377.32 13,588.08 $ 2,766.73 $ 16,600.38 25,229.26 $ 4.90 $ 20,134.10 - $ - $ - 568,132.50 9,000.00 $ 19,000.00 4.00 $ 840.00 5.00 $ 375.00 30.00 $ 6,300.00 31.00 $ 2,170.00 1.50 $ 1,350.00 2.50 $ 500.00 28.00 $ 840.00 83.00 $ 12,782.00 18,250.00 $ 18,250.00 29.00 $ 1,218.00 33.00 $ 495.00 50.00 $ 332,450.00 1,050.00 $ 6,300.00 1,400.00 $ 1,400.00 3,300.00 $ 13,200.00 1,950.00 $ 11,700,00 4.00 $ 16,436.00 - $ - $ $ 2,264.68 $ 6.14 $ - $ $. TOTAL ALTERNATE HID 4 2.73.99 $ 618,694.89 449,529.23 $ 445,606.00 Page 3 TABULATION OF BIDS - BY LOWEST PRICE WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT - PHASE I CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.000 ENGINEERS -ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BIDS OPENED: FEBRUARY 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ARCON CONSTRUCTION CO. CARL BOLANDER & SONS HOLST EXCAVATING ITEM UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT I _ BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 10,000.00 $ 10,000.00 $ 36,700.00 $ 36,700.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 6,500.00 $ 25,000.00 $ 25,000,00 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1 LS $ 2,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 4,500.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 -3 CLEAR TREE AND GRUB STUMP 7 EA $ 400.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 800.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 600.00 $ 4,200.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 7,000,00 4 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 572 SY $ 3.60 $ 2,059.20 $ 9.00 $ 5,148.00 $ 3.00 $ 1,716.00 $ 7.00 $ 4,004.00 5 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 370 LF $ 5.00 $ 1,850.00 $ 5.70 $ 2,109.00 $ 5.00 $ 1,850,00 $ 4.00 $ 1,480.00 6 _ PATCH BIT ROADWAY 4" THICK 572 SY $ 43.00 $ 24,596.00 $ 20.00 $ 11,440.00 $ 19.00 $ 10,868.00 $ 25.00 $ 14,300.00 7 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 175 LF $ 30.00 $ 5,250.00 $ 25.75 $ 4,506.25 $ 15.00 $ 2,625.00 $ 20.00 $ 3,500.00 _ 8 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP FES 4 LF $ 120.00 $ 480.00 $ 274.00 $ 1,096.00 $ 200.00 $ 800.00 $ 500.00 $ 2,000,00 9 SEEDING, iNCESEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 16,500 SY $ 2.65 $ 43,725.00 $ 1.25 $ 20,625.00 $ 2.75 $ 45,375.00 $ 3.00 $ 49,500.00 __. 10 SODDING TYPE LAWN 1,633 SY $ , 5.65 $ 9,226.45 $ 3.00 $ 4,899.00 $ 4.00 $ 6,532.00 $ 6.00 $ 9,798.00 , 11 CL-5 FOR DRIVEWAY 6" DEPTH 493 TN $ 19.25 $ 9,490,25 $ 18.50 $ 9,120.50 $ 11.00 $ 5,423,00 $ 30.00 $ 14,790,00 12 BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 154 TN $ 60.00 $ 9,240.00 $ 50.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 44.00 $ 6,776.00 $ 90.00 $ 13,860.00 13 CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 1 EA $ 700.00 $ 700.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000,00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 14 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 42 LF $ 45.90 $ 1,927.80 $ 75.00 $ 3,150.00 $ 21.00 $ 882.00 $ 70.00 $ 2,940.00 15 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 15 LF $ 47.35 $ 710.25 $ 100.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 25.00 $ 375.00 $ 70.00 $ 1,050.00 16 16" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 6,649 LF $ 41.99 $ 279,191.51 $ 56.00 $ 372,344.00 $ 52.00 $ 345,748.00 $ 80.00 $ 531,920.00 17 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 6 EA $ 685.00 $ 4,110.00 $ 1,120.00 $ 6,720,00 $ 1,000.00 $ 6,000.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 9,000.00 18 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 1 EA $ 1,045.00 $ 1,045.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 1,440.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 19 16" BUTTERFLY V VALE & BOX 4 EA $ 2,125.00 $ 8,500.00 $ 3,400.00 $ 13,600.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 8,000.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 16,000.00 _ _ 20 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 6 EA $ 2,070.00 $ 12,420.00_ $ 2,270.00 $ 13,620.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 12,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 30,000.00 21 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ 5.90 $ 24,243.10 $ 2.38 $ 9,779.42 $ 4.90 $ 20,134.10 $ 4.00 $ 16,436.00 TOTAL BASE BID $ 453,564.56 $ 538,597.17 $ 492,504.10 EBI DRILLING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT ... $ 761,578.00 ALTERNATE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ - $ 40,700.00 $ 40,700.00 &$ 25,008%00 0$s 251:060800,0000 2 REMOVEDISPOSE OF BIT: PAVEMENT 210 SY $ . $ 8.00 $ 1,680.00 $ $ 3 SAW CUT BIT, PAVEMENT 75 LF $ - $ 5.50 $ 412.50 $ $ 8.00 $ 600.00 4 PATCH BIT. PAVEMENT 4" THICK 210 SY $ - $ 6.50 $ 1,365.00 $ _ $ 30,00 $ _ 6,300.00 5 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 70 LF $ - $ 15.80 $ 1,106.00 $ - $ 20.00 $ 1,400.00 6 SEEDING, INCL, SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 900 SY $ - $ 3.50 $ 3,150.00 - $ $ 4.00 $ 3,600.00 7 SODDING TYPE LAWN 200 SY - 9.00 $ 1,800,00 $ _ $ 10.00 $ 2,000.00 8 C15 30 TN $ - $ 105.00 $ 3,150.00 $ _ __$ _ _ 60.00_ $ 1,5od.66 - 9 BIT, PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 2" DEPTH 154 TN $ - $ 50.00 $ 7,700.00 $ _ $ 90.00 $ 13,860.00 10 CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 1 EA $ - $ 5,100,00 $ 5,100.00 $ _ $ 4,000.00 $ 4,000.00 11 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 42 LF $ - $ 135.00 $ 5,670.00 $ _ $ 80,00 $ 3,360.00 12 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN __ 15 LF $ - $ 192.00 $ 2,880.00 $ - $ 100.00 $ 1,500.00 13 DIR. DRILL 16" (DIR))-1DPE DR 17 6,649 LF $ _ $ 54.00 $ 359,046.00 $ 62.00 $ 412,238.00 14 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 6 EA - $ - $ 1,200.00 $ 7,200.00 $ . $ 1,500.00 $ 9,000,00 15 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 1 _ EA $ - $ 1,650.00 $ ' 1,650.00 $ 3,000.00 $ 3,000.00 16 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 4 EA $ - $ 3,600.00 $ 14,400,00 $ 4,500.00 $ 18,000.00 17 6" HYDRANT (7-6" BURY) 6 EA $ $ 2,500.00 $ 15,000.00 $ $ 5,500.00 $ 33,000.00 18 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ - $ 3.50 $ 14,381.50 $ - $ 0.01 $ 41.09 19 TYPE LV-3 BIT. NON-VVEAR COURSE MIXTURE 0 TN $ $ - $ _ $ - $ 90.00 $ --- _ 20 TYPE LV-4 BIT, WEAR COURSE MIX 0 TN $ $ - $ - _ $ $ 90.00 $ 21 BITUMINOUS MATEIIAL FOR TACK -COAT 0 GA $ - $ - $ _ _ $ _ $ 4,00 $ 22 TOPSOIL BORR_ - OW 0 CY $ $ - $ _ _____. _. __ $ 30.00 $ 23 SODDING 0 SY -- $ - $ - $ $ 10.00 $ TOTAL ALTERNA1 E BID 486,391.00 $ 540,079.09 Page 4 TABULATION OF BIDS - BY LOWEST PRICE 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 WATER SYSTEM INTERCONNECT - PHASE I CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 13186.000 BIDS OPENED: FEBRUARY 18, 2005, AT 10:00 AM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ENGINE • ARCHITECTS • PLANNERS BILL MILLER-MINNCOMM PUSH, INC. UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT BASE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ $ _ $ 2 TRAFFIC CONTROL. 1 LS $ _ $ _ $ 3 CLEAR TREE AND GRUB STUMP 7 EA $ - $ $ _ 4 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF BIT. PAVEMENT 572 SY $ - $ 5 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 370 LF $ - $ _ $ 6 PATCH BIT ROADWAY 4" THICK 572 SY $ _ $ - $ 7 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 175 LF $ _ $ _ $ 8 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP FES 4 LF $ - $ _ $ _ 9 SEEDING, INCL. SEED, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 16,500 SY $ 10 SODDING *1-YPE.- LAWN 1,633 SY $ _ $ _ $ _ CL-5 FOR DRIVEWAY 6" DEPTH 493 TN $ _ $ _ $ BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY 27 DEPTH 154 TN $ - $ , $ _ CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 1 EA $ _ $ _ $ _ 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 42 LF $ _ $ 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN 15 LF $ - $ 16" DIP OL-50 VVATERMAIN 6,649 LF $ - $ , $ 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 6 EA $ - $ _ $ 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 1 EA $ - $ _ $ 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 4 EA $ - $ _ $ 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 6 EA $ $ _ $ MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ - $ $ TOTAL BASE BID L ALTERNATE BID 1 MOBILIZATION 1 LS $ 16,625.00 $ 16,625.00 _$ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ - 2 REMOVE & DISPOSE bF BIT. PAVEMENT 210 SY $ 12.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 4.80 $ 1,008.00 $ - „_ ... _ - 3 SAW CUT BIT. PAVEMENT 75 LF $ 3.00 $ 225.00 $ 4.05 $ 303.75 $ - 4 PATCH BIT. PAVEMENT 4" THICK 210 SY $ 45.00 $ 9,450.00 $ 12.00 $ 2,520.00 $ 5 REMOVE & REPLACE CMP CULVERT 70 LF $ 50.00 $ 3,500.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,400.00 $ - 6 SEEDING, wa.§LTD, FERTILIZER & WOOD FIBER BLANKET 900 SY $ 3,00 $ 2,700.00 $ 4,20 $ 3,780.00 $ - 7 SODDING TYPE LAWN 200 SY $ 6.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 5.30 $ 1,060.00 $ - 1 ._. .. CL-5 30 TN $ 20.00 $ 600.00 $ _ .. .. . ..__ .. _ 11.50 $ 315.00.__ _ _ $ , $ , 9 BIT. PAVEMENT FOR DRIVEWAY?'. DEPTH 154 TN $ 50.00 $ 7,700.00 $ 183.50 $ 28,259.00 $ - $ _ 10 CONNECT TO EXIST. WATERMAIN 1 EA $ 1,700.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 1,350.00 $ - $ _ 11 6" DIP CL-52 WATERMAIN 42 LF $ 65.00 $ 2,730.00 $ 27.50 $ 1,155.00 $ $ _ ...... , _ _..... 12 8" DIP CL-50 WATERMAIN -- 15 LF $ 85.00 $ 1,275.00 $ 29.85 $ 447,75 $ $ _ 13 DIR. DRILL 16" (DIP) HDPE DR 17 6,649 LF $ 72,50 $ 482,052,50 $ 74.15 $ 493,023.35 $ _ $_ 14 6" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 6 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 996.25 $ 5,977.50 $ $ 15 8" RES. SEAT GATE VALVE & BOX 1 EA $ 1,200.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 1,290.00 $ 1,290.00 $ $ 16 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE & BOX 4 EA $ 2,900.00 $ 11,600.00 $ 2,350.00 $ 9,400.00 $ _ 17 6" HYDRANT (7'-6" BURY) 6 EA $ 2,200.00 $ 13,200.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 24,000.00 . $ 18 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4,109 LB $ 3.25 $ 13,354,25 " $ 3.75 $ 15,408.75 $ _ 19 TYPE LV-3 BIT. NON -WEAR COURSE MIXTURE 0 TN $ 55.00 $ - $ - $ - $ 20 TYPE LV-4 BIT. WEAR COURSE MIX 0 TN $ 55.00 $ . $ - $ _ 21 IBITUMINQUSMATERIAL FOR TACK COAT _ 0 GA $ 1.50 $ , $$, 22 TOPSOIL BORROW , 0 CY $ 15.00 $ - $ - $ $ _ 23 SODDING 0 SY $ 6,00 $ _ $ - $ $ TOTAL. Al.TERNATE BID $ 578,831.75 $ 598,228.10 Page 5 IF Water System Interconnect - Phase I City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Project No, 13186.000 Bidder 'American Cast Iron Pipe Company Arcon Construction Company, Inc. Barbarossa and Sons, Inc. Bill Miller-MinnComm Burschville Construction, Inc. Cad Bolander & Sons, Inc. Chris Riley Utilities, Inc. , 1 Davies Water Equipment Company EBI Drilling, Inc. Ellingson Drainage Enerson, Inc. Forrer Supply Company, Inc. Friedges Contracting Company Frontier Pipeline G.F. Jedlicki, Inc. G.M. Contracting, Inc. Hoist Excavating, Inc. Hydrocon, Inc. Inland Utility construction, Inc. Kober Excavating, Inc. Minnesota Pipe & Equipment National Waterworks Northdale Construction Park Construction Company Push, Inc. Richard Knutson, Inc. S.J. Louis Construction, Inc. S.R. Weidema, Inc. 'Three Rivers Construction Engineer's Estimate Bid Bond — — Addenda Ret'd Total Amount of Acknow. P & S Base Bid t$ 4, 5-6 Bids Due: 10:00 a.m. Date: February 18, 2005 Total Amount of Alternate Bid 57? TR 4, g 5er7 , 11 '4(42 iteciantams 0,.3 428,053.00 - 5 Li -19 og 414415„..3p 43 43 02_13,19 44q,s,p,cr 513, 543 13s.5o t" wiL(-4zer , 447,561.00 Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9A Agenda Item: Preliminary Plat/Comp Plan Amend/Rezoning/CUP/OP Concept — Deer Glen Background Information for April S, 2005: As directed by the Council on March 15 we have attached draft resolutions regarding each of the actions applied for in this matter, as prepared by the City Attorney. The Resolution regarding the Preliminary Plat is for approval, with conditions. Two Resolutions are presented for the OP Concept Plan: Denial and Approval. All other Resolutions (Comp Plan Amend, Rezone, and Conditional Use Permit) are for denial. Action items: Motion(s) regarding the attached Resolutions Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution #2005 — 2. Draft Resolution #2005 3. Draft Resolution #2005 — 4. Draft Resolution #2005 — 5. Draft Resolution #2005 - 6. Draft Resolution #2005 — Approving Preliminary Plat — Approving OP Concept Plan Denying OP Concept Plan Denying Comp Plan Amend Denying Rezoning Denying Conditional Use Permit Time Allocated: CITY OF LA E MO WAS NGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-027 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE P', LIMINARY PLAT OF DEER GLEN W REAS, on the 7" day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve a preliminary plat called DEER GLEN; and WHEREAS, on the 28" day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Development Application; and WHE ' AS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, T FO BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Approves the preliminary plat as illustrated on Pre Plat Drawing, prepared by Kimley- Horn & Associates, Inc., dated February 7, 2005, which would create Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A, B, C and D, DEER GLEN, subject to the following conditions: a. In regard to proposed Outlot B, lot lines shall be adjusted as necessary to ensure that proposed Outlot B is a minimum of ten (10) acres. b. In regard to proposed Outlot D: (i) Lot lines shall be adjusted as necessary to ensure that proposed Outlot D is a minimum of ten (10) acres; or It shall be combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 1; or In the event that the City Council approves the open space development - concept for proposed Outlot A, its use shall be restricted so that it can only be used in conjunction with the proposed open space project on proposed Outlot A. ADO D, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5' day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-028 A RESOLUTION DENYING A COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT FROM RAD TO PF REQUESTED BY LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH WHEREAS, on the 7111 day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed comprehensive plan amendment application requesting the City of Lake Ehno approve a Comprehensive Plan Amendment from RAD to PF, and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Comprehensive Plan Amendment; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Comprehensive Plan Amendment, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOVLED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Denies the Comprehensive Plan Amendment from RAD to PF to construct a church on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Deer Glen based on the following findings: The City Council has reviewed the current comprehensive plan land use designations for applicant's property and for surrounding parcels, and has concluded that at the present time, in its judgment, the current land use designations continue to reflect the City Council's vision plan for development of land in this portion of the City. 2. The current Comprehensive Plan land use designations do not appear to be the result of any prior errors. 3. The current Comprehensive Plan land use designations will not require modifications as a result of the settlement between the City and the Metropolitan Council. 4. The City Council wants to implement the overall Comprehensive Plan changes required as a result of its settlement with the Metropolitan Council before it re- evaluates Comprehensive Plan designations for specific areas of the City. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator (LEChurch Comp Plan) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-029 A SOLUTION ENYING T E APPROVAL IF T E POPOSE REZONING FO LOT 1, BLOCK 1, IEER GLEN WHEREAS, on the 7t1 day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application request that the City of Lake Elmo approve a rezoning from a Rural Residential (RR) designation to a Public Facility (PF) designation for proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Deer Glen. WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the rezoning application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the conunents of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the rezoning; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the rezoning application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby" Denies the Rezoning for Lot 1, Block 1, Deer Glen based on the following finding: . The rezoning would not be consistent with the City's 1990 Comprehensive Plan the City approved 2000 Comprehensive Plan and with any changes to the City approved 2000 Comprehensive Plan anticipated as a result of the settlement between the City's and the Metropolitan Council. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator (LEChurch Rezoning) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-030 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PE BY LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH FOR PROPOSED LOT 1, BLOCK 1, DEER GLEN WHEREAS, on the 7th day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requests that the City of Lake Elmo approve a Conditional Use Permit to construct a church on 20 acres. and T WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Conditional Use Permit application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Conditional Use Permit; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Conditional Use Permit application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendation and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Denies the Conditional Use Permit for a church on proposed Lot 1, Block 1, Deer Glen based on the following finding: The conditional use permit would allow development that is not consistent with the current zoning for the applicant's property and because the traffic generated by the proposed development would create serious traffic congestion at the intersection of Keats Avenue and Highway 36, as indicated in the traffic study dated the 15th day of December, 2004 prepared by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-031 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE SITE PLAN OF LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH. WHEREAS, on the 7th day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve a Section 520 Site Plan for Lot 1, Block 1, of the proposed plat of DEER GLEN; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Development Application; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Denies the approval of the proposed site plan for Lot 1, Block 1 of the proposed plat because the site plan is for a development that would not be consistent with the current RR zoning for applicant's property. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor PEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator CFTY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-032 A RESOLUTION DENYING THE OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT OF LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH. WHEREAS, on the 7th day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve an Open Space Preservation Development Concept Plan; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Development Application; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Denies the open space development -concept plan for Outlots A and D, DEER GLEN, as illustrated on a portion of the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church Concept Plan prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc. dated September 24, 2004 for the following reasons: a. The open space development -concept plan proposes significant modifications to natural grades and to existing floodplains on Applicant's property and is therefore inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Environmental Protection policies which require residential developments to conform to the limitations presented by natural features of the land and natural drainage systems. The proposed development would require the grading and redistribution of approximately 70,000 cubic yards of soil and fill; will require grading and scraping which will disturb approximately ten (10) acres of a forty-eight (48) acre site and such significant modifications to natural grades will be required in order to develop approximately one-half of the proposed lots in a manner that is consistent with the requirements of the Valley Branch Watershed District. b. The open space development -concept plan is inconsistent with the purpose of the City's Open Space Preservation Ordinance because it proposes to significantly alter the natural drainage features of the site. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005-032 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE OPEN SPACE PRESERVATION DEVELOPMENT OF LAKEWOOD EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH. WHEREAS, on the 7th day of February, 2005, the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve an Open Space Preservation Development Concept Plan; and WHEREAS, on the 28th day of February 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended denial of the Development Application; and WHEREAS, on the 15th day of March, 2005, the Lake Elmo City Council reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the Planning Commission recommendations and the comments of the Applicant and its representatives. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Approves the open space concept for Outlots A and D Deer Glen as illustrated on a portion of the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church Concept Plan prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc., dated September 24, 2004 and noting that the open space project does not include the development of Lot 1, Block 1, DEER GLEN even though that development is also illustrated on the preliminary plat. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator 9. PLANNING, LAND USE & ZONING: A. Preliminary Plat, Comprehensive Plan Amendment, Rezonirw, Conditional Use permit and OP Concept Plan — Deer Glen:Resolution No., 2005-027 — Resolution No. 2005-033 (Adoption of Resolutions Postponed) The City Planner reported the Planning Commission adopted a recommendation to deny all of the subject multiple applications for the platting of 108 acres, an Op Concept Plan covering 40+ acres; a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (from RAD to PF) for 20 acres; and rezoning (from RR to PF) for 20 acres, and a Conditional use Permit for a 52,000 sq.ft. church facility on the 20 acre site. No action was taken regarding the church Section 520 Site Plan pending Council action on the precedent applications. Chuck Palmer, Lakewood Evangelical Free Church, stated this plan fits in the future direction of Lake Elmo. The church traffic will have a minimal impact except for weekends when church is in session. He would like to work with the city and MnDOT to resolve any problems. Jim Arkell stated he is a Lake Elmo resident who attends this church and had served on the Plaiming Commission when they worked on the 1990 comp plan. Then the Commission realized it didn't have an ordinance that would deal with churches. This is a perfect transition buffer moving south from a major highway. Paul Danielson, Consulting Engineer, Kimley-Horn & Associates, reported this is the best site for the church in this 108 acre site which is in the middle on higher ground with buffers from other potential developments. They have modified the plan for a buffer on the west side, wetlands on north side and a small wetland throughout the site. There is no wetland litigation proposed. He said he spent time with the VBWD in how to deal with water quality and storm water management plan and have obtained a permit from the VBWD. The roadway avoids the wetlands and follows contours as much as possible to minimize tree impact. There are various areas that don't drain out and have flood storage issues. Outlot B is slightly less than 10 acres and will be adjusted to ensure that the proposed Outlot B is a minimum of 10 acres in the Preliminary Plat. Craig Peterson, BWBR, said the building would be rising from the landscape without screaming for attention and nestled into the landscape with building materials of natural colors. It will be welcoming and inviting reflecting the personality of the church. Mayor Johnston asked the council should to deal with all development applications separately. Preliminary Plat: The City received a letter stating the applicant would be willing to correct Outlot B that is substandard. Attorney Filla noted the Council is addressing the preliminary plat illustrated on preplat drawing, prepared by Kimley-Horn & Associates, Inc, dated February 7, 2005 which would create Lot 1, Block 1 and Outlots A, B, C and Deer Glen. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 7 If the Council should approve the preliminary plat, it should be subject to: 1) Outlot B is a minimum of ten acres, 2) Lot lines adjusted to ensure that Outlet D is a minimum of 10 acres or combined with proposed Lot 1, Block 1, and 3) If the open space development concept for proposed Outlot A is approved, it's use shall be restricted so that it can only be used in conjunction with the proposed open space project on Outlot A. Peter Beck, attorney for the applicant, explained Outlot D is a dedicated open space development concept plan. It is not intended to be a buildable parcel because it is dedicated open space. There will be a condition in Preliminary Plat approval that places this in dedicated open space. M/S/P Johnson/Conlin — to direct the City Attorney to draft a resolution approving the preliminary plat subject to the conditions stated by Attorney Filla. (Motion passed 5- 0:DeLapp stated the applicant has exempted the road, ask for the same rights the others have been given.) Open Space Preservation Plan The City Planner explained the Planning Commission indicated the concept plan is inconsistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan Envirornnental Protection policies regarding residential developments conforming to the limitations presented by natural features including natural drainage systems, by proposing significant modifications of natural grades and existing floodplain on the site. The City Planner stated it is a subjective call regarding how much floodplain can be filled or moved around. The Planning Commission thought it was significant enough to deny. The engineer for the church responded there is no impact on the jurisdictional wetlands. The soils are not conducive to create wetlands. The open space development plan proposes significant modifications to natural grade and to existing floodplains on the applicant's property and is inconsistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan Environmental Protection policy. The plan is inconsistent with the purpose of the City's Open Space Preservation Ordinance because it proposes to significantly alter the natural drainage feature of the site. Comprehensive Plan Change for the 20 acres for the Church Mayor Johnston said he did not see the justification to change the City's Comprehensive Plan from RAD to PF. The Council reviewed the current comprehensive plan land use designation for this property and decided the current land use designations continue to reflect the Council's vision plan for development of land in this section of the city. The current comp plan land use designations will not require modifications as a result of the settlement between the City and the Met Council. Attorney Filla indicated the Council should implement the Comprehensive Plan changes required as a result of its settlement with the Metropolitan Council before it re-evaluates comp plan designations for specific areas of the City which should known by May. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 8 The Council indicated it was not willing to change the comprehensive plan. Rezoning from and RR Designationto a PF Designation Mayor Johnston noted that the hardship does not exist for a rezoning and there is a reasonable use of land under the current zoning. Attorney Filla pointed out that the rezoning would not be consistent with the City's 1990 Comp Plan, the City approved 2000 Comp Plan and with any changes to the City approved 2000 Comp Plan as a result of the agreement between the city and the Met Council. Conditional Use Permit The City Planner explained based on the traffic study the traffic generated by the proposed development would create traffic congestion at the intersection of Keats Avenue and Highway 36. Mr. Danielson reported that Mn/DOT said that this development would not create any unsatisfactory problem on Hwy 36, but does present delays on Keats approaching Hwy 36. There would be a minimal impact on the intersection except on weekends. Danielson said MnDOT would say the 3-corner intersection could be in now. The church is willing to spend $150,000 to improve this intersection. The requested Conditional Use Permit for proposed Lot 1, Block 1 would allow development that is not consistent with the current zoning for the applicant's property and because of the traffic generated by the proposed development would create serious traffic congestion at Keats Avenue and Hwy 36. Attorney Filla will draft a resolution incorporating Council direction. The council recommended denial of the comprehensive plan amendment and the rezoning from RR to a PF designation so the use will be denied because it is not consistent with the zoning. M/S/P Conlin/Johnson - to table the development applications for the Lakewood Evangelical Free Church until the April 5th Council meeting where resolutions will be provided for council approval. (Motion passed 5-0.) B. Minor Subdivision/Site Plan and Zoning Variance. Amendment to the Development Moratorium, Public Hearing:Vacation of drainage easements — Lynsky (Brookman 3rd Addition),Resolution No. 2005-025, Resolution No. 2005-026, Ordinance No. 97-153 Planner Dillerud reported the Plannine, Commission adopted a recommendation for denial of the applications for Minor Subdivision and Section 520 Site Plan that are proposed by the applicant to allow construction of a 10,000 sq.ft. office building on 39th Street North. Prior to the Commission's vote on the motion, the Chair offered the applicant's representative an opportunity to waive the 60 day city review window to allow time to process the variance issue, but that offer was declined. Dillerud noted that subsequent to February 14 one of the partners of the project formally requested the 60 day review waiver, and a variance application will be heard by the Planning Commission on March LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES MARCH 15, 2005 9 Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9B genda Item: OP Concept Plan — Farms of Lake Elmo Background Information for April 4, 2005: At its its meeting March 28, 2005 the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and adopted (8-1 Sedro opposed) a recommendation to approve this OP Concept Plan for 30 single family building lots on a site of 84 acres. The recommendation deletes the Staff condition (#1) requiring the developer to install a full 200 foot OP buffer between the house pads of the westerly 3 lots and the west project property line. By implication, a 100 foot buffer with appropriate landscaping would be the expectation for the Development Stage Plan, but a 4/5 City Council waiver will be necessary to adopt that design strategy. Corrunissioner Sedro's "nay" vote related to this element of the recommendation — not the OP Concept generally. Action items: Motion to adopt Resolution #2205 - , approving the OP Concept Plan of Farms of Lake Elmo per the plans staff dated March 18, 2005, and subject to conditions #2 - #4 of the Staff Report of March 18, 2005 and a 4th condition that the nameplate letters be removed from the rock wall at the entrance. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution # 2005 — Approving Concept Plan 2. Draft Planning Commission Minutes of March 28, 2005 3. Planning Staff Report of March 18, 2005 4. Please Bring the Project Booklets that Were Sent with the March 28 Planning Commission Packets Time Allocated: A ESOLUTI CITY OF LA ELMO WAS NGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA ES LUTI N N a 2005- N APPROVING THE OPEN PAC P VATI EV L P ENT F FA S F LAKE ELM HEREAS, on the 9th day of March, 2005, the M & K Development, LLC, ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve an Open Space Preservation Development Concept Plan; and HEREAS, on the 28th day of March, 2005, at a public hearing, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended approval of the Development Application; and NOW, THEREF RE, E IT ESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Approves the Open Space Concept Plan for FARMS OF LAKE ELMO as illustrated on a M& K Development, LLC Concept Plan prepared by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc., staff dated March 18, 2005 with the following conditions: 1. Compliance with 4/5 waiver to buffering setback standards to the west and south, and the use of additional screening; 2. Compliance with recommendations of city engineer; 3. Compliance with city trail system plan; 4. Compliance with VBWD that the city engineer finds to be practical. 5. Removal of lettering from the entrance wall. AD PTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator (Unedited Excerpt from The Planning Commission Meeting of 3/28/05) PUBLIC HEARING: FA' S OF LA. ELMO The Planner introduced the Concept Plan applied for the Earl Friedrich Fan-n for an 83.8 acre OP Residential Subdivision. Approval of this stage permits the applicant to come forth with a second stage plan. He said that three lots at the southwestern edge of the site may not meet buffer requirements but an adjoining parcel is eligible for OP development. He said the applicant proposed alternative buffering such as berming. A waiver of 4/5 would be required by City Council. There are also a couple of other lots at the south end that might have difficulty meeting the buffering requirement. The adjoining parcel will never be developed because it is the LEPR, and he said it is the intent of the ordinance is to keep homes farther apart. The Planner said this parcel might be within the Shoreland district. A public trail is depicted in the concept plan that runs through this parcel. The city would want easements dedicated to give the trail to the public. Findings: The Concept Plan of FARMS OF LAKE ELMO sufficiently complies with OP Standards. Conditions: Compliance with OP Buffer or 4/5 waiver, Compliance with city engineer, Compliance with city trail system plan, Compliance with VBWD that engineer finds practical. The Chairman of the Parks Commission said the commission opted for fee in lieu of park in this development. Tim Freeman, Surveyor and Land Planner with FFE and Steven Masty, Landscape Architect Mr. Freeman said they conducted a neighborhood meeting last Wednesday for neighbors to get a sneak preview of their plan. Mr. Masty introduced key features and amenities on the plan. Mr. Freeman explained that encroaching neighbors will be granted open space easements so they may continue to use the property. He said this plan is minimizing water into existing wetlands. The stormwater system will send water north into the pond and into infiltration areas. There is very little pipe and no catch basin and the developer is very proud of that. He explained the design of the community wastewater treatment system. He said the applicant is open to creating easements or to use park dedication funds to construct it. He said the City Attorney might want to look at the liability issues for the public portions of the trail. The developer wants to reserve the right to ask people to stop if they are doing something wrong on the trail. He explained the reason for dedicating the Conservation Easements to the city. It is because fragmented open spaces are undesirable to the land trust and the types of uses do not fit their plans. He said the intent of the OP ordinance buffering standards is for when little lots are created next to existing larger lots. He said these lot sizes match or exceed neighboring properties, and only a few houses are anywhere close. Their plan would have the existing berm cut in with houses and planted above with additional buffering and screening. He said the intent of the ordinance is met with 100 feet of buffer. He said they worked hard to keep each lot not having a neighbor across or behind them. Commissioner Deziel asked why it was necessary to loop the road around the common area because a single lane would be narrower. Mr. Freeman said they wanted to separate that area and create a gathering space. A 46 inch oak is shown as a centerpiece. Part of the split accommodates that oak tree. He said they created that many more rainwater gardens to accommodate the runoff. Mr. Masty said when kids are playing in the center, it is safer with a single lane, one way road, and providing better visibility for automobiles. CHAIRMAN HELWIG OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:48 P.M. Richard Song lives on other side of the pond and asked where the drainfields will be. Mr. Freeman it is located at the top of the hill. He said homes are located on the outskirts of the site. Gloria Knoblauch is an adjoining neighbor. She said it is a beautiful, aesthetically pleasing plan with historic building preservation. She asked if additional ponds will raise groundwater, will drainfields contaminate wells on 31st Street, and can fire trucks get through. She wished the road could be named for Friedrich but said apparently regulations make it out of question. Bob Schumacher said he lives on the south side of the site on mud road known as 20th Street. His home will be within the 200 feet buffer of Lot 21. THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 7:52 P.M. Mr. Freeman said with their plan, there is a decrease of water ending up in the ponds. He said that everything they have done cannot alleviate all concerns completely due to groundwater issues. He said he believes there will be a substantial decrease in water once hydrological engineering is completed. Mr. Freeman said a community wastewater treatment system requires PCA approval and permits. It would not be allowed to contaminate drinking water of neighbors. He said the plan has not been formally presented to the Fire Chief. Roads at the size required by the ordinance do not function as well in the winter time. These are slightly larger. Street naming and numbering in the city is prescribed by the uniform system. The Planner street said the prevailing street design scenario is to insist on narrowest street possible due to impervious surface. He said the Fire Chief and Public Works may disagree. Mr. Freeman said there is a natural hill in front of Mr. Schumacher's home that is 30 feet high. He thought that would be enough of a buffer. They could possibly increase plantings in that area. Commissioner Schneider asked if there is a concern for water running off that hill. Mr. Freeman said no, there will actually be less water going down that hill than what there is today will be less. He said the City Engineer recommended a driveway dug out between the ponds but the DNR will never let that happen. M/S/P, Sedro/Sessing, to approve the Concept Plan of FARMS OF LAKE ELMO with staff conditions plus removing letters from the entrance wall. AMENDED, Helwig/Deziel, to amend the motion to remove condition number one except to keep the additional screening. Discussion: Lots proposed are larger than most neighbors. Intent is for developmental reasons for neighbors whose lots and uses are unalike. This development is less dense and 100 feet buffer on the western edge is doable without hardship to neighbors. VOTE: 8:1, Nay - Commissioner Sedro said she has heard good arguments for bending OP rules and regretted them later. Chairman Helwig said go back to 100 feet buffer on the western side only because of the ridge there. He said he recommends 4/5 waiver for that. arr te' Location Map 4 L'A 2 a i 3 : 21 St • • a 22 2 2 2 2 grs '-=141t44 esfygog, Or 're !4;., 'z--4vrie„ 0 T52N T311* T3ON T29N T2RN lItt 1126W RI 9W T32N T31N T3ON R22W R2IW R20 Vicinity Map T29N _cc 1700 Scale in Feet Tner drawing is tee revere a oromplaeon and reproducer* or Pod records ss Ines appear* various Washington County offices. The drawing should t* used tor reference purposes ohly. Wash:Von Corey is not responsible for any gnaccuracros. Source: Wastungton County Senores Off*, prp. MI) 430-6075 PdrCe data based en AS400 informatIon ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PORT Date: March 18, 2005 for the meeting of March 28, 2005 Applicant: M&K Development/Friedrich Estate Location: Southeast Quadrant of Janero Avenue and 31 SL Street North — North of the Park Reserve Requested Action: Open Space Development Concept Plan Land Use Plan Guiding: AG Existing Zoning: AG Site History and Existing Conditions: Other than a 1971 Building Permit for construction of a "pole shed" City records reveal no plarming/zoning/building actions by the City involving this parcel. The existing site of 83.8 acres has been a working farm for over 100 years. While approximately 10 acres of the site is open water, the balance of the site (less farmstead) is open farm field, with a scattering of trees adjacent to the farmstead and water areas. The site features rolling terrain, with approximately 35 feet of topography from high point to low point. A farmstead that included a house and 6 outbuildings (as of the 2000 air photos) is located in the center of the parcel. Discussion and Analysis: The applicants propose an OP Concept for the site that would result in 30 home sites. Wastewater would be treated by a common facility and water supply would be City. The Preserved Open Space is proposed to be held by City (as opposed to Minnesota Land Trust Easement). The applicants also propose renovation of two of the existing farm structures to serve as HOA owned features of the neighborhood. A single lot credit is proposed in return for the farm structure renovation (as permitted by the OP Ordinance). Staffreview of the Concept Plan design leads to the following observations: 1. Proposed lot areas meet or exceed OP lot area standards. 2. Lot count and proposed Preserved Open Space appears to be in compliance with OP standards — based on buildable area (totaling 71 acres). It appears that the applicants have properly deducted the water areas from both the buildable area, and from the claimed Preserved Open Space. 3 While no actual building pads are depicted by the Concept Plan , the applicants report that the 200 foot OP buffer standard that is applicable along the west line of the Concept would not be complied with. The application requests substitution of the 100 foot buffer with elevation differential (approximately 20 foot fall from the proposed homes to adjacent homes) and landscaping, as allowed by Section 301.06 Subd. 2E. Staffs observes that the alternative OP Buffer standard is not available to the applicants since the adjacent land is not itself eligible for OP development. The only avenue available to the applicant for the proposed 100 foot buffer substitution will be a 4/5 OP standards waiver by the City Council — Section 306.06. 4. It appears that several of the proposed lots along the east and south peripheries of the Concept would also fail to meet the 200 foot buffer requirement once house pads are identified. In both cases the lots will back onto the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve. In a recent similar situation lots of the Tapestry OP backed onto the City's Sunfish Park. In that case staff found that the Intents and Purposes of the OP ordinance would be complied with without a buffer to a major natural park environment. 5. The applicant proposes City water service to the neighborhood via a connection at Jamey Avenue. While the City has indicated an interest in serving this site with public water supply the timing and point of water service has not as yet been determined. The applicants should understand that service may not be available as quickly as they may desire, and service may be from 31st Street North rather than Jamley — at the City's option. 6. The applicant has not specified the type of "community" wastewater treatment proposed. 7. The City Engineer has made several design recommendations by his Memo of March 11 — some of which repeat those noted above. In addition, comments have been received from both the Valley Branch Watershed District, DNR and Washington County — all attached. Note that staff had a discussion with DNR regarding our Shoreland Ordinance as applied to OP projects in the past. The City Shoreland Ordinance does specifically refer to OP lot area minimums — Y2 acre (left over from the Old OP standards). We fail to see the DNR issue in this regard. 8. The City Trail System Plan is before the Park Commission in its Final Draft Form. The Commission will soon be transmitting the Plan to the Planning Commission for review. The current draft depicts a public trail running east/west through this site with a west extension across Jamley to Tablyn Park. Compliance with the adopted (or draft) City Trails System Plan should be reflected by the Development Stage Plan for this site — including removal of direct trail access to the Regional Park. Findings and Recommendations: Staff finds that the OP Concept Plan generally complies with the standards of the OP District — as such standards are applicable at the Concept Stage. We find, however, that the proposed lots along the west border of the Concept fail to comply with OP buffer standards, and do not qualify for a reduced buffer alternative. Those lots must provide a 200 foot buffer unless a City Council 4/5 OP waive is approved. Staff suggests that a Planning Commission recommendation by for approval of the OP Concept Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1 Compliance with the 200 foot OP buffer requirement for all lots abutting existing platted lots. 2. Compliance the recommendations of the City Engineer. 3. Compliance with the recommendations of the Valley Branch Watershed District, as found applicable and practical by the City Engineer. 4. Compliance with the City Trail System Plan, with construction and dedication of Public trail within the neighborhood in accordance with that Plan — whether draft or adopted. Planning Commission Actions Requested: Motion to recommend approval of the Farms of Lake Elmo OP Concept Plan subject to the following conditions: 1 Compliance with the 200 foot OP buffer requirement for all lots abutting existing platted lots. 2. Compliance the recommendations of the City Engineer. 3. Compliance with the recommendations of the Valley Branch Watershed District, as found applicable and practical by the City Engineer. 4. Compliance with the City Trail System Plan, with construction and dedication of Public trail within the neighborhood in accordance with that Plan — whether draft or adopted. Charles E. Dil e ud, City Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. City Engineer's Memo 3. Valley Branch Memo 4. Washington County Letter 5. DNR Letter 6. Applicant's Documentation & Graphics Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Aenda I Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9C or Subdivision — 9057 Lake .Tane Trail Background Information for April 5, 2005: At its meeting March 14, 2005 the Planning Commission unanimously adopted a recommendation to approve this application to divide an existing 16 acres parcel into parcels of 2.04 acres, .75 acres, and 13.3 acres. This application is responsive to Comp Plan amendment actions and a rezoning that was approved by the City Council in 2004. A condition of the approval recommendation in that the .75 parcel be either combined with the parcel to the south (across Lake Jane Trail), or that a "No Build" covenant be placed on the title. Action items: Motion to approve Resolution #2005 - , approving the Minor Subdivision for Olinger at 9057 Lake Jane Trail per plans staff dated March 8, 2005, and subject to the conditions of the March 8, 2005 Staff Report. Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution #2005 — Approval of Minor Subdivision 2. Planning Commission Minutes of March 14, 2005 3. Location Map 4. Staff Report of March 8, 2005 5. Applicant's Graphics onsible: Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE MINOR SUBDIVISION REQUEST OF DANIEL AND JEAN OLINGER. WHEREAS, on the lst day of March, 2005, Daniel and Jean Olinger, ("Applicant") submitted a completed application requesting that the City of Lake Elmo approve a minor subdivision of a parcel located at 9057 Lake Jane Trail and legally described as: That part of the Government Lot 5 of Section 10, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota , lying northerly of the south 40 acres thereof and lying south of the following described line: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Government Lot 5; thence northerly along the east line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 1694.00 feet to the southeast corner of the tract described in Book 274 of Deeds, page 366, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota and the point of beginning of said described line; thence westerly deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the south line of said tract a distance of 330.00 feet to the southwest corner of said tract; thence northerly deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the westerly line of said tract to a line distant 249.00 feet southerly of the southerly line of Lake Jane Trail and the southeast corner of the tract described in Document No. 362324 on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said line and along the south line of said tract to the west line of said tract and the west line of the East 505.00 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence southerly along said west line of the East 505.00 feet of Government Lot 5 a distance of 9.27 to a point on the North line of the South 1711.82 feet of said Government Lot No. 5; thence Westerly along the North line of the South 1711.82 feet of said Government Lot No. 5 for 803.07 feet to the West line of said Government Lot No. 5, and said described line there terminating. AND That part of the Government Lot 5 of Section 10, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota , described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Government Lot 5; thence northerly along the east line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 1694.00 feet to the southeast corner of the tract described in Book 274 of Deeds, page 366, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota; thence westerly deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the south line of said tract a distance of 330.00 feet to the southwest corner of said tract; thence northerly deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the westerly line of said tract to a line distant 249.00 feet southerly of the southerly line of Lake Jane Trail and the southeast corner of the tract described in Document No. 362324 on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said line and along the south line of said tract to the west line of said tract and the west line of the East 505.00 feet of said Government Lot 5 and the point of beginning; thence northerly along the west line of said tract and along said west line of the East 505.00 feet of Government Lot 5 to said south line of Lake Jane Trail; thence easterly along said south line of Lake Jane Trail to said west line of the tract described in Book 274 of Deeds, page 366; thence northerly along said west line to the shore line of Lake Jane; thence westerly along said shore line to the east line of the West 591.00 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence southerly along said east line to the north line of the South 1711.82 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence easterly along said north line to the west line of the East 505.00 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence northerly along said west line of the East 505.00 feet of Government Lot 5 a distance of 9.27 feet to the southeast corner of the tract described in Document No. 362324 on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder to the point of beginning. Subject to a drainage easement in favor of the Valley Branch Watershed District as described in Document No. 397877, on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder. Also, subject to existing Lake Jane Trail running east -west through the above described property ALSO: That part of the Government Lot 5 of Section 10, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, Washington County, Minnesota , described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Government Lot 5; thence northerly along the east line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 1694.00 feet to the southeast corner of the tract described in Book 274 of Deeds, page 366, on file and of record in the office of the County Recorder, Washington County, Minnesota; thence westerly deflecting to the left 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the south line of said tract a distance of 330.00 feet to the southwest corner of said tract; thence northerly deflecting to the right 90 degrees 00 minutes 00 seconds along the westerly line of said tract to a line distant 249.00 feet southerly of the southerly line of Lake Jane Trail and the southeast corner of the tract described in Document No. 362324 on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder; thence westerly along said line and along the south line of said tract to the west line of said tract and the west line of the East 505.00 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence southerly a distance of 9.27 feet along said west line of the east 505.00 feet to the north line of the South 1711.82 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence westerly along said north line to the east line of the West 405.00 feet and the southeast corner of the tract described in Document No. 676524, on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder and the point of beginning, thence northerly along said east line and the east line of said tract to said shore line of Lake Jane; thence westerly along said shore line to the east line of the West 219.00 feet of said Government Lot 5 and the east line of the tract described in document No. 340685, on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder; thence southerly along said east line to said south line of Lake Jane Trail and the southeast corner of said tract; thence westerly along said south line and the south line of said tract to the west line of said Government Lot 5; thence southerly along said west line to the north line of the South 1711.82 feet of said Government Lot 5; thence easterly along said north line to the east line of the West 405.00 feet of said Government Lot 5 to the point of beginning. EXCEPT a 66.00 foot wide parcel of land over that part of the East 186.00 feet of the West 405.00 feet of said Government Lot 5 lying 33.00 feet each side of the following described center line: Commencing at the southwest corner of said Government Lot 5; thence North 01 degree 42 minutes 37 seconds West, bearing oriented to the Washington County Coordinate System, South Zone, along the west line of said Government Lot 5 a distance of 1943.00 feet to the center line of Lake Jane Trail as presently traveled and the point of beginning of the center line to be described; thence North 82 degrees 06 minutes 53 seconds East along said center line 218.31 feet; thence easterly along said center line and a tangential curve, concave to the south, having a radius of 2 3926.21 feet and a central angle of 02 degrees 45 minutes 10 seconds, a distance of 188.64 feet to said east line of the West 405.00 feet of said Government Lot 5 and said center line there terminate. Also, subject to a utility easement in favor of the City of Lake Elmo as described in Document No. 774780, on file and of record in said office of the County Recorder. WHEREAS, on the 14th day of March, 2005, at a public meeting, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed the Development Application, the City Planner's reports and comments, the comments of the Applicant and the Applicant's representatives; and recommended approval of the Development Application; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby: Approves the Minor Subdivision for the property located at 9057 Lake Jane Trail as illustrated on a plans prepared by Folz, Freeman, Erickson, Inc., staff dated March 8, 2005 legally described as: Parcels A, B, and C with descriptions to be attached with the following condition: 1. The City Attorney must approve covenant language for the title of Parcel C prohibiting the construction of a structure on that lot. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005 Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator DRAFT Minor Subdivision: 9057 Lake Jane Trail - Olinger The Planner explained that this request for a minor subdivision follows a rezoning and comprehensive plan amendment from 2004. The applicant proposes to divide a parcel for their daughter and a second parcel for a neighbor to have water access. In the event the neighbor does not purchase that parcel, it will be reserved for recreational use for the future development on the larger parent parcel, and covenants will be drafted to prevent the parcel from ever becoming buildable. Commissioner Sedro noted that in the staff report a typo indicates a no -build covenant for Parcel C not B. Tim Freeman He said the minor subdivision is consistent with what was presented in 2004. He said the application meets code and DNR requirements in every respect. M/S/P, Ptacek/Sessing, to recommend approval of a minor subdivision of property at 9057 Lake Jane Trail subject to the condition that the city attorney approve covenant language on the title of Parcel C prohibiting the construction of a structure on that lot, VOTE: 9:0. City Council Update The Planner updated the commission about the previous Council meeting. Comprehensive Plan Modifications Policy The Planner distributed copies of his latest edits and drafts and a table for staging to the commission. The Planner announced that he has changed the Public Hearing date to April 4. The Planner said staging is important in an urbanizing situation with introduction of sewer, since the City must provide staffing, infrastructure, and services. Most communities that have urbanization in the future have a staging plan. The Planner explained the tables for staging options. Scenario No. 1 heavily back loads the growth at the minimum pace prescribed by the MOU. Scenario No. 2 also backloads, but to a lesser degree than #1 Scenario No. 3 attempts to distribute the growth relatively evenly over the 30 year period. Scenario No. 4 front loads to accommodate the fiscal aspects of City infrastructure costs — particularly water. The Planner said staging can be done by building permits per year, an infrastructure control ordinance, limiting lots platted or permits issued to slow installation of infrastructure. Administrator Rafferty said the number of units south and north of 10th Street is dividing the allocation annually as well. We have serious concerns making sure we are not in financial jeopardy. He said that needs to be considered for a front load scenario. Administrator Rafferty said the entire water system south and north must be constructed from water connection fees and revenues in the enterprise fund, or the General Fund becomes obligated. He said if we want development in the Old Village and to make it a commercial center, it gets harder if not recognized as a center early on. The Planner said he hoped to present some very detailed Land Use Mapping, but we just don't have the time to do it. He said the rush is to get something in to Met Council that meets desires, if not the detail we prefer at this time. Commissioner Lyzenga asked for a recap on funding options for municipal services. She would like a review of bonding, tax levies, etc., because we are getting to the point of conflicting fiscal and LAKE JANE LAKE JANE I t ; FARE JANE HILLS PARK 51 51 51 ... rn I j, 51 I 51 0 et e Location Map 51 51 LAKE JANE 51 51 LAKE JANE 51 51 1 e 51 51 51 51 line, lent' ROW 1 i 1 •D2N I 1 1 TeNe DIN I 1 'DON 1.I.T.Tese 11051 12951 12051 128N 12751 17.714 essi. 5e251 021W 92051 Vicinity Map 715 Scale in Feet Than drawing is the rennt of a compltation and reproduction of WTI meads as they appear in venous Washington Cc.* 01(555 The thawing cheutd 55 used for reference Incpcses 0S9y Wachtngran 5100051(5501 responsitne far arty Inaccuracies. Source: Wastungron Camay Surverats Once, Phone 051)430-n875 Parcel data based on ASAIO infer -matron ! LAKE ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF REPORT Date: March 8, 2005 Applicant: Dan & Jean Olinger Location: 9057 Lake Jane Trail Requested Action: Minor Subdivision Land Use Plan Guiding: SRD Existing Zoning: R-1 Site History and Existing Conditions: On July 6, 2004 the City Council adopted a Resolution amending the Comprehensive Plan to reclassify this site fro RAD to SRD; and, to rezone this site from RR to R-1. The Comprehensive Plan amendment and the rezoning were both subject to concurrence by the Metropolitan Council, which the City received on October 1, 2004. Discussion and Analysis: The applicant now proposed Minor Subdivision of the site of the previous Comp Plan/rezoning actions to create three separate tax parcels: 1. Parcel B — Approximately 2.04 acres (net of Lake Jane Trail ROW) located north and south of Lake Jane Trail, which will become an SFD building lot. 2. Parcel C - Approximately .75 acres (net of Lake Jane Trail ROW) north of Lake Jane Trail that will become an unbuildable remnant. 3. Parcel A — Approximately 13.3 acres (net of Lake Jane Trail and Jamaca Avenue ROW) located north and south of Lake Jane Trail that contains the existing Olinger house and accessory structures. The southerly portion of this proposed parcel (approximately 11 acres) remains land use guided RAD, and zoned RR. Subject to a "No Build" covenant that the applicant has proposed for Parcel B, all proposed parcels meet or exceed the dimensional standards of the zoning district in which they are located. Findings and Recommendations: Staff finds the proposed Minor Subdivision to be in compliance with the standards and process prescribed by Chapter 400 (Subdivision) for Minor Subdivision, and the resulting parcels to be in compliance with the applicable R-1 and RR zoning standards of Chapter 300 (Zoning). Planning Commission Actions Requested: Motion to recommend approval of a Minor Subdivision at 9057 Lake Jane Trail per plans staff -dated March 8, 2005, subject to a condition that a covenant, approved by the City Attorney as to form, be recorded on the title of el rohibi its use as the location of a residence structure. Charles E. Dillerud, City Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Documentation 117 Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9D Agenda Item: Section 520 Site Plan — 11051 Stillwater Blvd. Background Information for April 5, 2005: On March 2005 the Planning Commission unanimously (9-0) adopted a recommendation to approve this application to modify the site and make building additions that nearly doubles the size of this existing 2,057 square foot structure. Since the additions will not double the size of the structure, the GB Architectural Standards do not apply. The two issues that form conditions to approval are proper placement of the pylon sign and the City Engineer's recommendation that a septic site be identified on the site . Person res Action items: Motion to adopt Resolution #2005 - approving a Section 520 Site Ci Plan for site modifications and a 2,046 square foot addition to 11051 Stillwater Blvd. per plans Staff dated March 9, 2005, and subject to the conditions of the Staff Report. Attachments: 1. Resolution #2005 - , Approving Site Plan 2. Planning Commission Minutes of March 14, 2005 3. Planning Staff Report of March 9, 2005 4. Applicant's Graphics *b e: :Time Allocated: CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2005- A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SECTION 520 SITE PLAN FOR 11051 STILLWATER BOULEVARD WHEREAS, Bahr Management, has submitted a Section 520 Site Plan for site modifications and a 2,046 square foot addition to 11051 Stillwater Blvd., and WHEREAS, at its March 28, 2005 meeting, the Planning Commission reviewed and recommended approval of this site plan per plans staff dated March 9, 2005 as same on file with the City Administrator, subject to the following conditions: Relocation of the proposed monument sign to a point not less than 15 feet from the south edge of the MnDOT highway easement; or, elimination of the sign from the Site Plan. 2. Confirmation from the applicant that the installed height of the parking lot lighting fixtures be no more than 20 feet above grade — regardless of pole height. 3. Compliance with the requirements of the City Attorney, City Engineer, Valley Branch Watershed District (as found applicable by the City Engineer) and MnDOT. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council for the City of Lake Elmo does hereby approve the Section 520 Site Plan based upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin Rafferty, City Administrator (Unedited Draft Excerpt of the 3/28/05 Planning Commission Minutes) Section 520 Site Plan — 11051 Stillwater Boulevard The Planner explained that this application is for an addition to and remodeling of an existing commercial site. He said the new monument sign is unfortunately located within the Highway 5 right of way easement. Mn/DOT has not provided commentary yet. The Planner said he recommends approval subject to compliance with city engineer, VBWD, and finish height of lights being exactly 20 feet above grade or less, and the monument sign relocated 15 feet within the right of way line. Rodney Bahr, Applicant and Owner of Bahr Construction Mr. Bahr said he has an option to purchase the subject building contingent on city approval. He distributed some photos of the type of exterior he plans for the structure. He is still in discussions with Mn/DOT about relocating the sign. M/S/P, Sessing/Schneider, to recommend approval with three conditions in the staff report. Mr. Bahr said he would prefer the sign be separated from the motion until he has worked it out with Mn/DOT. VOTE: 9:0. .) Kim Kimberly Schaffel City of Lake Elmo ELMO PLANNING COMMISSION STAFF PORT Date: March 9, 2005 for the Meeting of March 14, 2005 Applicant: Bahr Management Location: 11051 Stillwater Blvd. Requested Action: Section 520 Site Plan — Remodel/Addition Land Use Plan Guiding: "C" (Commercial) Existing Zoning: GB (General Business) Site History and Existing Conditions: The site is 1.1 acres with an existing 2,057 square foot (foot print) structure that was converted from a residence to an office building in 1980 following rezoning by the City from R-1 to GB. City records reveal no other actions of significance on the site except a modification of the sign face message for the occupant insurance agency in 2004. Discussion and Analysis: The applicant proposes remodeling, site modifications and additions to the existing office structure. The additions would be to the south and west, totaling 2,046 square feet (foot print) as additional office space. The remodeling would be primarily internal, but also include a new exterior surfacing. Occupancy would continue to include the present insurance agency, but now also include a building contractor (the applicant). The site modifications primarily involve new off-street parking to comply with zoning ordinance minimums for GB office uses. Staff review of the proposed site plan for compliance with GB and other related standards reveals the following regarding the proposed plans: 1. All parking, GB setback standards, and GB site coverage standards (for site of less than 4 acres) are complied with. 2. The Section 520 landscaping value minimum is complied with, and the parking landscape island standard is not applicable due to the size of the off street parking area. 3 The additions to the existing structure (by foot print) total 99.4% of the existing structure. Since the additions total (just) less than a 100% enlargement of the existing structure, the site plan is exempt from GB exterior surfacing standards. (Ordinance 97-108, amending Section 300.07, Subd. 4H4). 4. The proposed exterior lighting generally complies with code standards if the overall fixture height does not exceed 20 feet from arade. Any pedestal height added to the specified 20 foot light pole will result in non-compliance. 5. Proposed wall signage is compliant with Sign Ordinance standards. 6. The proposed street monument sign appears to comply with sign area standards, but the applicant proposes to locate this sign in the same location as the present pylon sign — within the MnDOT roadway easement. Staff has discussed this with the applicant in the past, and has advised the applicant that, while the present pylon sign (with any new copy the applicant requires) could remain (subject to MnDOT) as legally non -conforming as to set back, any new sign must meet a set back standard of 15 feet from the highway ROW — south edge of the MnDOT easement. 7. The applicant proposes to upgrade the present holding tank wastewater system. Findings and Recommendations: Except with respect to the proposed monument sign location, staff finds the Site Plan to generally comply with applicable City Code and Zoning Ordinance standards for a project as described. A recommendation of approval is suggested. Planning Commission Actions Requested: Motion to recommend approval of a Section 520 Site plan at 11051 Stillwater Blvd. per plans staff -dated March 9, 2005, subject to the following conditions: . Relocation of the proposed monument sign to a point not less than 15 feet from the south edge of the MnDOT highway easement; or, elimination of the sign from the Site Plan. . Confirmation from the applicant that the installed height of the parking lot lighting fixtures be no more than 20 feet above arade — regardless of pole height. Compliance with the requirements of the City Attorney, City Engineer, Valley Branch Watershed District (as found applicable by the City Engineer), and MnDOT. Charles E. Dillerud, City Planner Attachments: 1. Location Map 2. Applicant's Graphics AZ;.e.,?,?;IT:e 4222,2 2.252.2 0 w 22 300 0! -41 an 34 uJ HWY PASPMEHT per Book 258 Heed, Prep 2. Location Map 1E2 2 00 3003 ,21.2022.300030 3 .0001 111.. 0949' 4non 090001 A n3 ,..4322 3, • ICAO 00 5 0 2 ;a 000 00 241 t2 19 a E 22.89 4,3 .4-0----- 2' t40 tt.-- ;',. 302-- ‘441'11 2 As, _4- --- ' stt, ------ 22 g. 20 Itt ,343, C , t 3 3 3,` . .0013_3-423 173.1 .^12222-2,22.22.24 8 .42 2 17 2 Z 12 ) 92 21 g < 00 //- tea, 4-.- 16 14 33,33 40 -3 .041a 15 t 03,4 13 "tt 12 COUNT‘AUDITOWS % 4", s \ 5 s;0 42222, 10 tel, 2° 5 0,43 4 .... , 3305 tirto ,, A,,, , A 5 '3 ft.V°7 tt 0 00 ------;0 t - ttS .... ,= s 0, .0,, ... 05 30 e9191 `OW 3 48. ,12 8 25 - 34 t 1 8 ea, t 2 0 so tt, T!NO 8 00 00 , I 3000 1 " R2103 02003 81403 T3'11:1 T3 TI1n TRiN 12924 —2:At 35905 1'ht 128N 81 1200 12714en / 12.721 12121 922.W 02103 R20W Vicinity Map 03t2:1, to--09.92422 12.1.4.4.4- 0 190 Scale n Feet Thus drawing is tea result of e compilation anemia/octant/on of land records as tney appear in venous Washington County °Rees The dramang should be used for reference putposes only. Washington County ss not responsible kr any inaeourames Sotoce, WashInglon County Stmayoes SW. Phone 1651) 483E475 Parcel cant eased an AS409 intormation ENGINEERS • ARCHITECTS• PLANNERS U To: Chuck Dillerud Copies To: 1500 Piper Jaffray Plaza 444 Cedar Street Saint Paul, MN 55101-2140 (651) 292-4400 (651) 292-0083 Fax www.tkda.com Reference: Site Plan Review 11051 Stillwater Boulevard City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota Proj. No. 13186.000 From: Thomas Prew, P. E. Routing: Date: March 18, 2005 I have reviewed the site plan dated March 3, 2005, and have the following comments: Access The current driveway entrance is not changing in size or location. Septic System It is proposed to install two holding tanks until such time as municipal sanitary sewer service is available. There is not a time table yet for City sewer to be extended to this site. The following conditions should apply if the holding tanks are allowed. First, a drainfield area should be identified so a conforming septic system could be built if necessary. Second, the Owner shall agree to connect to City sewer within 6 months of it being available to them. The septic tanks shall be abandoned or removed at that time. Any existing septic tanks shall be abandoned as part of these site improvements. Drinking Water The plan shows connecting to City water. The existing well shall be abandoned in accordance with State Health Department Code. Surface Water Two small ponds with a grass channel between them are proposed. The design encourages some infiltration. Final outlet is to the channel south of the property where the water currently runs. Other A bond for the site improvement work and a second bond for the landscaping should be required prior to issuance of a building permit. An Employee Owned Company Promoting Affirmative Action and Equal Opportunity : a. TOP OP PLATS TOP OP FLOM TOP OP RATE 10P OF FLOOR El LI ommn EXISTING BACK ELEVATION Sok Ur. re EXISTING RIGHT ELEVATION Sal. lir -1,0. EXISTING LEFT ELEVATION Begge r pa• 101. OP 'KATI TOP OF MATE NEW BACK ELEVATION NEW FRONT ELEVATION ...-- _.... ---------,-------- ---- , _ L I I H 11 ITM TOP Of RAH 4 TOP OP 1.10011 EXISTING FRONT ELEVATION Sala IT.1‘0. • 4 iSlaCenArgjal Wortolins BM, VMS MI NaSten - - NEW RIGHT ELEVATION Ikalc 1/0- nit III I I NEW LEFT ELEVATION - ARAL WOMB COMMACTIR TO VeAWY 147I01.1817,10 MOP SIDPEI TOP Or PLKIE Pa. 700 Of PLOOlt TOP OP RATE TO? OPIUM' _ TOP OF NATO 4 17 701.0P TIMM 4 2 5! sa 6 a v) PRAWN 'iqr Mathew MeAonala VLEVATTONs Slifer NwAseix. jal?.NRMBER. B. 0 0 re. , , „" f;,,,,, / //,G,'/", tn, FABRIC SILT FENCE 29.80 ,`rrrrrruru� �rT�1r�.rsar• t. , �_ i ° `/ / \\ ' `1 °�- \s 8 \ \ 1 1 1 • / - ,•- /, rr r/ //% /I /y /r / , 'if�- /� _ / �P�S i i I 1 _`\ 1 1 �i m,, 1 I I� • I I I"1N N'r GRADING & EROSION CONTROL 0 5 10 20 40 EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN 1.) ALL GRASS AREAS TO BE STABNIEO WITHIN 14 DAYS OF ROUGH GRADNG COMPLETION. 2.) INSTALL SILT FENCE PRIOR TO ANY OTHER CONSTRUCTION, SILT FENCE MAY BE REMOVED UPON COMPLETION OF Alt SITE RESTORATION. 3.) INSTALL ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE AT BEGINNING OF INITIAL SITE GRADING. REMOVE %HEN PAVING OF SITE BEGINS 4,) STORMWATFR DISCHARGE FROM SITE I5 NA SOLES INTO INFILTRATION BASIN. 5.) CONTRACTOR SHALL MAINTAIN ALL EROSION AND SEDIMENT CONTROL FRAMES UNRL COMPLETION OF ALL SITE RESTORATION. ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE NOT TO SCALE 5%RE MESH REINFORCEMENT-- (OPTIONAL) L) ENGINEERING FABRIC METAL, W000 POST, OR STAKE. 8' MAX. SPACING, 2' INTO GROUND. FABRIC ANCHORAGE 1RENCN. OACV111 NITN TAMPED NATURAL 5011, DIRECHON 0T RUNOFF.. NATURAL 50L NOTE DEPLNONIG UPON CONFIGURATION, ATTACH FABRIC TO %IRE MESH VAIN HOG RINGS, STEEL POSTS VAIN MIRES, 0R BOW POSTS WITH STAPLES SILTATION FENCE INSTALLATION DETAIL NOT TO SCALE 2' MN/DOT GLASS W RIP -RAP is 1:00irlli i d :ice\VV•v1v- /�\ is wt. SECTION A -A NOTE: 5008 MIRAFI FABRIC 0R ECUAL 2' l-%UYEN FILTER FABRIC IP-RAP AT PAVEMENT EDGE NOT TO SCALE sp fig lilt J $ 0 it etl W? arCD g ZJ g aU 18 a0 to E 0MI-- E°y OwZ z ZQ2 9-I' mio 0 ALL OO MORENB AND CONDITIONS MOULD BE VERFI®BY THE CONTRICIOR BUMP CDN9IRIICIIOIL O 5 g 4 12050035 SHEET C1 4411M' 243M 6-11' 6 k ts 44`•1,111n• IAWN3i=)2W 1T439P 741M 104134• !-13M• 13'43/4' 3'a1M' 1 10414. nir IC.0374 =PM ZieS4 SW/ a 101 TA614 — 44M-saw 44'-3U54' II:1e56 IG11767 466841,11 a 13616Q.Pf. 1619' 1- 3 34 44, 4115W 4,1 - S 1SWAWwm2W 'mama my se g 4•1*•4.15n• y3F WANOST L •lot?4�S I i61n 40••2,I1SM 49.-141 M00129313W IAWN39=] 64IM' t/:' '///J�),11f''•RI15M 44'-1'-il3n' /�!///IIAWIamo=W _ IAWm3331W 119 1o1M 39'-4IM ..__. .._._. ._._ 3.1411M• _ 1x11M 31V N1.M• 611m 3,101M• 9 a 5426p8r. 4'-1'..(34' 4.1••4,15W rano91. IGP493ST 4,1 IM 49• 0.11M S.P FV 5.13M' 3-0' _ Sa' _ 40112. 3V3MM f•16• 4,16• 64' 3147• 13' 31'a• NEW FLOOR PLAN Sala1W l'9' IV-3114' kk h 419'. 41 SW 40• • 6-113/y lAWNAU14 16W3II4 T9� 49,54Sr ICAP.GD Cl --O 264• i 0z 44•-1•1156• A-3 uWN14313W 661 7O.Pr. 404• 1 I m86• I 74. 1 441M I 74' I 441M I 5,5311' VW-Il-I1 L! 4Y• 1•115:' 44•-1413V 4V.141SW 1A91439D23' _ 16144294 W _ I1W142921211/ 1A0.16733331/ 44•-5,3 SM 4.9'- H616' 4A^-S-3LS 44••Sa sT 1CAP3160 IC/SS10 ICA8. 4 IG11.63 1241' 6161M' _ S# 4-9' 74' 26,21W 24'a1M 33-101/4 37414, IIf-I6IM EXISTING FLOOR PLAN Sa111M-DO• Y-11 1Y4 2,71/2. 461M as 9 O 6'IIASDY4IL0I111U 081r.DS0EA7D8N0 =1681006616.0C D13UlATION ?DI.YV/. 1n•OYP.Doa.. ®IMOIT.DO0 - 5X651DD4616'O,C IM0YP.196D 7�9 — © In• 14.0 314 6PW ]3M1141 16.OJC� rn•a4r.e6D 1 * CONTRACTOR TODA0 kOM1 NW ALL W wy� _ W061 LLIMAe4&.13W09. Ices 4 5 ].I6IM A 4 FLOOR.PLftN SHEET NI4M13.ER. _JO8 NLI IBER / / /// / // ,// / 6 / 6 / 7 / / / / / /• t. ,. O E$ .I 2414-+—I8 r— ' ✓ r Ps t5 ,4 t9ds17O a .,b.S . wJo A;f er Y w', J<='vim 0.6 E otM''- 0p tXTa. 96 EV,tn4X� a7w PDX a�z acs �20266 44 / /1 (-.1-- NW CORNER OF TRACT ,�f•••J 1OF LAW PER BOOK 76 / 4 DEEPS, PACE148 / i !, / 7-7 i / -9V CORNER OF TRACT CO LAND PER 6006 76 OF DEEPS. PACE HB l ti </EXISTING LEGAL DESCRIPTION: (NOTE: LEGAL DESCRIPTION PROVIDED by Bahr Construction) All that part of Lot 1, County Auditor's Plat No.B, Washington County, Mi*86006 , described as follows: Beginning at the quarter -section comer on the west side of Section 13, Township 29 North, Range 21 West, thence north along the west Ilne of said Section 13, 329.64 feet to a stone monument on the southerly side of the St: Paul and Stillwater Road; thence North S5 degrees 16 minutes 30 seconds East along the said southerly line 0f sold Road 464.63 fat to the northwest comer of a tract of land COOVOYed by James 5. Cotiopy and wile to Wiliam Albredlt by Warranty Deed dated and acknouled1edJune It, 1910, and recorded in the office of the County Recorder In and far sald Washington County In Book 76 of Deeds, page 148, to the place of beginning; thence south along the west line of said land 261,60 fat to the southwest Comer of said land; thence South 72 degrees 48 minutes West 225.00 feet to a point; thence north along a One parallel to the sald west Tine of saki Section 13 0o a point In the saki southerly Ilse Of saki St. Paul and 5tiUWateri Road; thenceNorth 55 degrees 16E mimrtes 30 secorrds East along the sold southerly line 0f said road to the place of beginning. EXCEPV the easterly 15.00 feetthertof, EASEMENTir .INFO: N0 TITLE WORK WAS PROVIDED BY BAHR CONSTRUCTION, INC 0R THE SELLER OF THE PROPERTY. RIGHT OF WAY INFORMATION SHOWN BASED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY HALF SECTION MAPPING. ADJOINING PLATS AND MAPS WERE USED TO ESTAEUSH THE CENTERLINE OF STATE HIGHWAY NO. 5. OTHER EASEMENTS MAY DOSTTHAT ARE NOT SHOWN ON THIS SURVEY. THE CONVEYANCE OF THE WESTERLY 15.0D FEET OF THE PARCEL IN THE RECORDERS OFFICE COULD NOT BE FOUND BY CORNERSTONE IT IS BELIEVED THATTHIS PROPERTY WAS DEEDED TO THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO FOR THE TRAIL THE UNDERLYING DESCRIPTION FOR THE ADJOINING PARCEL TO THE EAST WAS USED TO ESTABLISH THE SOUTHERLY LINE OFTHI5 PARCEL THE BEARINGS M THE DEED CALLS WERE IDENTICAL AND THE CALL OF THE CENTERLINE EXTENDED WESTERLY WAS HELD. `/`DEVELOPMENT DATA: TOTAL AREA a 44,916 SQ. FT. / 1.03 ACRES, RIGHT OF WAY a 10,316 50. FT. / 0.24 ACRES NET AREA a 34,600 S0. FT. / 0.79 ACRES PROPOSED IMPERVIOUS AREA a 14,305 SQ.FT. 41.3% TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING 1 STALL FOR EVERY 200 SOFT. OF INTERIOR SPACE TOTALINTERIOR SPACE- 3,97950.FT. / 200 a 20 STALLS G SURVEY NOTES: 1 • BEARINGS ARE BASED ON WASHINGTON COUNTY SECTION INFORMATION NAD 1983 2. UNDERGROUND UT1111135 NOT LOCATED. • 3, ELEVATIONS BASED BENCH MARKS PROVIDED BY MNDOT. 4. UNDERGROUND UTILITIES,CAS, ELECTRIC, ETC. NOT SHOWN OR LOCATED. 5- SEPTIC AREA NOT LOCATED OR SHOWN. SYMBOLS: 0 43 ME ER FENCE CONCRETE • DENOTES FOUND I /Y IRON PIPE DENOTES SET 1/2' IRON PIPE MAIOLED RIS 25718 TO BE SET u11MWra1UUDlra CATCH BA51A WATER HYDRANT UTIUTY POLE • LIGHT POLE TELE/EEC BOX GU VALVE WIRES WELL Gopher State One Cal TO � I�-4W1"At--1t66 0 20 40 MILE= SCALE 1 INCH = 20 FEET NORTH PROPOSED OFF"/CE ADDITION C' CONTACT: CONTACT: RODNEYBAHR • BAHR CONSTRUCTION 11550 STILLWATER BLVD. LAKE ELMO, MN 55042 PHONE 651-351-1890 FAX 651-439-0484 GCOUPT•Y/CM: WASI-IINcrrc r 4I=1. ILJ NI TY" 4.= II -TY G3 IP LAKE 1=LMl=P ,SEAL: s THE STATE OP MINN0 ilkil IES NOT REQUIRE ASEAI. SFr,,• CERTIFICATI I hereby certify that Ms plan was prepared - byme, 0runder mydirect supervl3o14 that 1 am a duly Licensed Laod043ii under the l , state of MINNES6TA. ml r I LThues Re9lst Ion Nat 25716 Oye•2-24-05 — f REVISIONS: ".` _: : DATE RLVWON 2-24-OS SITE RAN 3-3-05 REVISESItE RAN PROJECT LOCATION: 1 1 0 51 STILLWATER BLVD. N. P.I.D.#1302 921230067 FILE NAME PROJECT NO. R8050113 Sin/SURVEY DEMQLI IOy LAN SURVRe1R • D CKED: DATE: 3:01.05 0 -11z C 0 2 11 NO0'09' 24”PT 184.30 BUILDING ADDITIONS 11051 STILLWATER BOULEVARD LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA 55042 PE14810,11 LANDSCAPING/ UTILITY PLAN CATE Demo: 265.27 NO072' 24" 265.27 N0012. 24 "If Larson Engineering of Minnesota 3624 Labo. Roed WNW Boar LEAL MN 66110 1P) 061.461.01E0 (F) 651.401.953/1 I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THL9 PLATA SPECIFICATION OR REPORT WAS PREPARED RY ME OR UNDER MY DIRECT SUPERVISION AND THAT I AM A DULY IJCENSED PROFESSIONAL ENGINEER UNDER THE LAWS OF THE ATE OF MINNESOTA. Morn., DATE 3.01.05 FAaoito,n, SILT *0.0 N00°09' 24"I TYPE 'E' 'o.o '0.0 'op 'pa '0.0 'pm 4 0, *o.o -0.0 '0.0 0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 + '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 VIr .° '0.0 *0.0 '0.0 '4.4 '0.0 .1 '0.0 "0. '0.0 '0.0 0,0 0 '0.0 * '0.0 .0.0 • '0.0 'op '0.0 '0. 8,4 o.o 'op *0.0 +0.0 .o 0.0 0,0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 o.o ▪ '0.0 'op '0.0 *o.o ' '0.0 'op 'oh\ -"0,0 "pa `op '0.0 *o.o '0.0 0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 ' O4194NCZ + .0 *0.0 *0.0 '0.0 'OA 0.0 '0.0 *0.0 0.0 .0 A '0.1 '0 0.1 '0.1 *0.8 +0.6 '25 1 '2. 3'3.5 '2.7 *27 0.7 0.60 1.0 0,5 +0.3 '0.6 *0.8 '0.8 '0.7 .4 '0. '0.3 '0.6 '0.7 "0.7 '0.6 0.4 '0 1.3 * .4 '0.8 *0.8 *0.6 * ARIZ SIT • '0.0 '0.0 '2.3 '3.6 '3.3--- .0 *0.3 '0.4 .9 '0.5 0 A 0.5 t 1,17 273 TYPE 'B' 0 0,5.. 42' '0.0 .0 0. 1 *o.o '0.0 '0.0 "o/ 6.0.44 * 0.0 +op "op 'op s't,: 0.0 +0.0 '0.0 +0.0 -0.0 "0.0 '3.0 .0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 +0.0 '0.0 '0.0 0.0 p.o "a. '2.0 '0.0 •?'3.00 • '0.0 +o.o '0.0 '0.0 .o +o.o *0.1 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 -0.0 . . '0.0 '0.0 '1 0 '02 '0.' '0,1 '0.0 *0014q**0.tr * *0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '10 '•';' +02 *0.11'0.1 '0,0 *0.0 *0.0 '0.0 10 8, '71, • + *O. *0.1 *0.0 '0.0 '0.0 '0.0 -0.0 'O. •• -.: • •• ci.- "0.0 * e fo ^-'!„,..: . .0 '0.0 EXTERIOR PHOTOMETRIC PLAN tt.tozok I- 777 D 10 2C 40 LUMINAIRE SCHEDULE 03183 Lthst 83 03013; 1032388 108383 c)0 2 1082232901499 AREA1224510051148 CUTOFF REFISC702. FLAY (1484.981.2252. 70001831421120 OVE CAST 81.1804134 2 18012 fLOCOUGHTWITti WARM 1102.1291031 war =MUM% 830241819 MASS, W FLAT 04.4011LE101. 48*40 Lamm Llf Weft 010 360.0554101010 80.24112£134.5241280 122232910AL 903)0032 33414821CLEART3 10120.190)90 180522811121.908. 33000 9.72 237 2449 arz 521.7 STATISTICS ID•4912988 120043 M'3 102 404, 0.125039 3208102 Cat Zeno 0215 3.712 0,00, NI A N /A LUMINAIRE LOCATIONS 1501328 03 139.56 X 7 2 1422 93442309 TA X 433 8 4 4323810 1923200 20.0 289 00 00 4973310 130604 00 2 4873300 122945.0 20.0 208 000 OD 437335.4 102000 0.0 3 49741340 1930380 92 09 53.1 1200 44514212 1039100 3.0 4 430301 1930720 02 0.0 204,1 IOU 4874220 1330200 3.0 ALL 0931190 REM 50911940M0)13 IMMO 0212.00123 0112124X24008002 SUM 9.9)420108053.1. F.4 z 0 3302 co r1 Z 021 Oc'000 Z 0, 04 STORAGE I \ \ .I \ ,I \ I \ \ NIST C-P IAWtt+=32W uWx \ 9Q PChA6RI9T \ C$ 11'4. EXISTING FOUNDATION PLAN 6atc tT • LIP \\ NEW FOUNDATION PLAN 9uk )1XISTENOLIMOSPACE UIPLGIEI BAPALLNEWV41, WATBRMAMAI NEPJ-0Bt PM SWIERMLEO MALDMO PING ROOT SYSTEM MA(Th4CTit TO STINSIPSA YGTRIM MEE }magi L WIHEWKATEk iRlH5 VEP.t.#!M= EMS IMOOFFICE ,N 0 CROSS SECTION Sa1c IIr FASCIA: OOMPRACIYAt TOMMY.. MATOP EXt1lRRP PLATE a rRLS9 HERF.eziw:w WlNBWE ATR* TRllss NFPLNFflm Tar O£FIAOR OXItaiEXTSTNR W1, MATCH IIR WW1, ROW SEFBZ ROOFVIM'S AS ROOF. AOPRPALTS111NOLES ROOF VENPDASfIRSRFFD IPUELTPAFPI SIMAT wmal1iQTN3 DiSOLATNM DAPPLE f ILE WATBIMIELD ALIVAL MISS NHFHOfRATION BYfTIIISS WXURACTllatia ASPNALTSSWGE.ES RWP VFNTS A6 MARRED ISRAELTPAPER Wtft{INO WI912229$ tlretrt AOON SAME IIARDYFASCTA .10E a WATER ANR_LO ASDFPET IYSMOI R-IS BATF INSULATION j'OLY Ve. VI' SIG PASOA: SO?TT: HARM PASCK RDEPET SYSMA NEW OFFICE BPACS TMFOG CROSS SECTION CROSS SECTION FOUHDATUNL J4Oa. NICIdno DAMFPROMFRia SCRS 1remu CMS 6'CMO F f CANCAVEMOIINO 0.T. GRAVES, AP: M AOFNALP TEASStIMOMSMUM, ROOF VENTS AS R M, IS#PPLT PAM. SHEATHING WIESLE9 INSUTATPON DAF}LE M. us k WAPEMIIm n EXMOOR WALL y IMMIX S@IFg MUM WRAF PIRATEINO SND WALLA 160L R[6D xJBLETW RATE MSULATION POLY VS, )n'QYF FLOOR: 3MSUDP1001, 91M' FLOOR IR TRUST to 16^ DL FOONOATTOR nDL0.ANCHOIMKTA Tee DAM? PROOFING CRS 17'Q0/ 9DOTRN hr x 1r CIFILRETE FOOTING DRAWPAI FOIANBATfiON PLAN SUCTIONS SKEET NI.{MBER A Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9E Agenda Item: Zoning Ordinance Text Amendment — Home Occupations in the RR Zone Background Information for April 5, 2005: At its meeting March 14, 2005 the Planning Commission conducted a Public Hearing and unanimously (8- 0, Commissioner Sessing did not remain at the table for discussion and vote) adopted a recommendation to approve an amendment to the text of the RR zoning district to permit Home Occupation as an Accessory Use. The Commission considered the reports of the City Attorney and City Planner on the matter, and concluded that the amendment amounts to a code housekeeping item. Person r o sible: Action items:, Motion to adopt Ordinance #97- , Amending Chapter 300 of the C. City Code to add "Home Occupation" as an Accessory Use in the RR zoning district. Attachments: Time Allocated: 1. Draft Ordinance #97 - , Amending Zoning Text 2. Planning Commission Minutes of March 14, 2005 3. Planning Staff Report CITY OF LA E MO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA 0 NANCE NO. 97- AN ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 300.07, SUBD. 4.B.2. LATING TO HOME OCCUPATIONS IN THE RURAL • SIDENTIAL ZONING DIST CT Section 1. Amendment: Section 300.07 4.B.2 Accessory Uses and Structures is hereby added to the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, to wit: Section 300.07, Subd, 4.,B.2.b. b. Horne Occupations Section 2. Effective Date: This ordinance shall become effective upon its passage and publication according to law. ADOPTED by the Lake Elmo City Council this 5th day of April, 2005. Dean Johnston, Mayor ATTEST: Martin J. Rafferty, City Administrator DRAFT meet the code. If the law is the law for all we should obey our own laws. Commissioner Schneider said bonds have been sold for the maintenance facility . He asked if now it will cost additional funds for land purchase should the Sunfish site not be used. Does relocation add a large cost to the project? The Planner said relocation adds large cost to the project. M/S, Ptacek, to recommend no action on the conditional use permit to construct a public works facility and a water storage facility on city -owned land in Sunfish Lake Park. FAILED FOR LACK OF A SECOND. Chairman Armstrong said he firmly believes there are no legal restrictions to using this City -owned land for public works/parks and a water storage facility, and while he is firmly convinced the city has a moral obligation to uphold, Staff has done the best they could. The City desperately needs a public works/parks facility and a water storage facility. M/S/P, Armstrong/Schneider, to recommend denial of the application for a conditional use permit to construct a public works facility and a water storage facility on City -owned land adjacent to Sunfish Lake Park, or in the alternative, to recommend that the City Council withdraw the applications based upon the Findings that park land should not be utilized for more intense uses. Commissioner Armstrong said residents are strongly opposed to allowing parks facilities to be used for a water tower and a garage. He said it was unfortunate that the agreements did not survive into the deeds. He recommended that the Facilities Committee be reinstated because they made progress finding sites for a new city hall. Commissioner Deziel said he thought the motion was appropriate. The commission does not know enough and might need more education. He said we need more public input at an earlier point in the process. He said the Parks commission knew of this application late in the process. Commissioner Fliflet said the problem seems to be more with the site than with a variance or conditional use permit. Commissioner Lyzenga said the city can expect this type of conflict to become more common as we move into the future. We will look at this more often - balancing the concerns of long-term residents with new residents. The City has to build a water tower and put out fires. She said that the cheapest solution may not be the best solution, and we may have to dig into our pockets to hang onto our values. VOTE: 8:0:1 Abstain: Helwig - for reasons of potential conflict of interest. THE CHAIRMAN RECESSED AT 8:49 P.M. THE CHAIR RECONVENED AT 9:04 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING: Zoning Text Amendment — To allow Home Occupations in RR COMMISSIONER SESSING RECUSED HIMSELF AND STEPPED DOWN FROM THE TABLE. The Planner explained that Home Occupations are allowed in all residential districts but are not mentioned in the RR Zone. He reported that the City Attorney researched the zoning ordinance into the 1970's, and found that Home Occupations were never included in the RR Zone. He also reported that the Planner researched any amendments and found none whether recommending removal of Home Occupations from RR or inclusion of it. The Planner provided code language for the inclusion of Home Occupations in the RR portion of the zoning code. THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARNG AT 9:08 P.M. DRAFT AT 9:09 P.M., THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AFTER HEARING NO COMMENTS. M/S/P, Ptacek/Sedro, to recommend approval of a zoning text amendment for Section 300.07 4.b.2, to allow Home Occupations in the RR Zoning District. Commissioner Ptacek said the matter was simple housekeeping. VOTE: 9:0. COMMISSIONER SESSING RETURNED TO THE TABLE. PUBLIC HEARING: CIP 2005-2009 AMENDMENT The Planner introduced the City's application to amend the CIP 2005-09. He advised that an amendment to the CIP is an amendment to the Comprehensive Plan. He said the section proposed for is the street construction/reconstruction section is the Infrastructure Reserve Fund. He reported that the City Engineer has sampled the Hilltop sub grade, and has determined it was not as bad as presumed. Instead of total reconstruction of Hilltop the City Engineer now recommends a less costly mill and resurface project. The Planner said that finding will free some street funds in 2006 to undertake deferred overlay projects in 2006 Commissioner Fliflet said it appears the cost has gone up for those overlays about $18,000. The Planner said that cost has gone up THE CHAIRMAN OPENED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:16 P.M. NO SPEAKER CAME FORWARD, AND THE CHAIRMAN CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 9:17 P.M. M/S/P, Ptacek/Sessing, to recommend approval of an amendment to the Capital Improvement Program 2005-09, Infrastructure Reserve Fund to add 2007 street overlays to the 2006 program, and amend the Hilltop project from reconstruction to overlay. VOTE: 9:0. PUBLIC HEARING: Variance — Visible Roofing Materials — Village North Office Park The Planner reminded the Commission of the application by Mike Lynskey for a site plan and minor subdivision for an office building. The Planning Commission had previously recommended denial. He advised the Commission that the applicant has waived the 60 day review period, and has requested going forward with the variance to allow asphalt roofing. Commissioner Deziel said the proposed roofing materials are a reasonable use of the property. Tracy Gallows She said the partnership is excited to have an office building in the Old \Tillage. They tailored their architecture after the bank and the Carriage Station dental office. She said it looks professional, and it may eventually become part of a PUD application. She said that asphalt shingles will tie in with what is already in the city. She said all the commercial buildings in the area have asphalt shingle except for Leslie's. She said the metal seam roof will not look like what they are trying to achieve. She requested the commission reconsider the entire application package together with the roofing variance., Mike Diem, Architectural Network Mr. Diem said Arch Net has their office in the Carriage Station Professional Park. He said they listened carefully to what Lake Elmo wants. They designed all four of those buildings in Carriage Station.; He displayed a photo of one of those office buildings. He said the Carriage Station buildings were designed with asphalt shingle before the code was changed. They could do it with standing seam but it would be a challenge, and asphalt shingle will be a smoother transition with the residential community planned north MO ovember 18, 2004 for the Meeting of November 22, 2004) To: Lake Elmo Planning Commission From: Chuck Dillerud Subject: Home Occupations On November 16 the City Council heard a decided an appeal from a resident to a City Notice of Violation regarding the conduct of a Home Occupation. The Council affirmed the Staff Violation notice, but also noted possible issues within the City Code text regarding Home Occupations that are in need of review and recommendation by the Commission. The most obvious issue identified by the Council relates to the exclusion of Home Occupations as an allowable Accessory Use in the RR zoning district even though that Accessory Use is specifically included in the AG, RE, R-1, and R-2 zoning districts. The City Attorney has reviewed all prior Zoning Ordinances for the City — dating back to the mid 1970's — and notes that same RR exclusion (versus inclusion in the other residential/AG districts) in all prior Zoning Ordinances. That confirms that there has not been any directed amendment to the RR district standards regarding Home Occupation for at least 30 years. So, should the Zoning Ordinance now be amended to include Home Occupation as an allowable Accessory Use in the RR District? Should the Commission be of the opinion that such an amendment needs to be considered, direction to staff to publish the required Public Hearing Notice is appropriate and necessary. No action can be taken by the Commission (since this is a zoning matter) without the Notice and Hearing. The Council also has directed the Commission to review the current definition of "Home Occupation" as appearing in Section 150 of the City Code. A specific concern has been raised by residents regarding the prohibition on the keeping of stock -in -trade that is now a part of the definition. It has been suggested that many of the "typical" home occupations (such as cosmetics sales and other door-to-door or "party sales" home businesses) require some measure of home kept stock -in -trade. As the definition now reads, the keeping of one container of cosmetics that is intended for sale to others would be a violation. It has been suggested that some threshold of stock -in -trade (be it cubic or square footage, or some other quantitative threshold) be considered in the definition. The definition can be modified without Public Notice or Public Hearing since it is not a par of the Zoning Ordinance. Does the Commission wish to address this matter in detail? If so, we can include the issue on the same future Commission agenda as the Public Hearing on the other issue — if that be the direction of the Commission. Lake Elmo City Council April 5, 2005 Agenda Section: Planning, Land Use & Zoning No. 9F Agenda Item: CDBG — Award Contract for Cimarron Gas Service Replacements Background Information for April 5, 2005: Staff solicited proposals for Cimarron gas service line replacements from 10 plumbing firms. The single bid that was received is being reviewed by the Building Official, and staff will have a report and recommendation for Council consideration On April 5. Action items: Motion regarding gas service replacement vendor, as appropriate. Attachments: 1. Gas Service Replacement RFP Perso onsible: Time Allocated: Request for Proposal REPLACEMENT OFNATRUALGAS SERVICE LINES Cimarron Manufactured Housing Neighborhood Lake Elmo, Minnesota Overview This document solicits proposals from qualified natural gas service installation contractors to undertake o City -funded project to replace deteriorating natural gas services from meter to appliances on up to 100 manufactured housing units located in the Cimarron Manufactured Housing Neighborhood in Lake Elmo. All work shall becompleted byJune 3O. 2005. This project is funded from Federal CDBG Grant funds. Then*foro, Davis Bacon Wage Scales must be paid. The City will undertake all other Federal fiscal and reporting requirements. Backaround In 2003 the City contracted o visual inspection of the natural gas service connections of the 200 oldest manufactured housing unite in bheCimanon—monyofvvhinh are neady4O years old. The outcomes of that inspection project revealed circumstances of improper inotoUetion, improper alterations to the services and physical deterioration of service piping, unions and valves. The City has determined that the gas service problems observed may constitute a potential threat to public aofety, and replacement of those appurtenances is therefore in the Public interest. The City has also determined that many ofthe Cimarron manufactured housing owners with observed gas service line concerns do not have the personal financial resources available to expediently replace the natural gas services within their homes. Responding to these two determinations by the City. 2004'2005 City Community Block Grant funds have been reserved to provide City financial assistance to qualifying Cimarron homeowners for the purpose of the necessary natural gas service line replacement, Those funds will be available to pay for the contractor's replacement services/materials where the property owner can not doso. OesoriationofTawks. In development of the proposal, the contractor should assume that the following tasks will be performed for up two 100 manufactured housing units in Cimarron, as assigned by the City Preparation by the contractor of a complete Work Order for each manufactured housing unit which details the replacement tasks/materials deemed to be requinad, and the contractor's |obor/mohahm|o quote and schedule to complete the required replacements. The contractor shall secure City permits for each unit on which gas service replacement work will be conducted. The City will waive all permit fees, but permits must be secured before work commences. Completion by the contractor ofall work specified by the Work Order sm approved in advance bythe City. CcUmtrac - tor ��wa|UDcation AUcon�ocboreresponding tothis solicitation shall belicensed bvthe State aoPlumber/Gas Fitter. Evidence of licensure must be attached to all proposals submitted responsive to this certification. Pmonoma|Cwntent The contractor shall provide proposed flat rate charges for the work to be performed on up to 100 units. It is anticipated that multiple rates will be required to address varying per unit gas service line lengths to be replaced, and varying per unit numbers of appliances served with natural gas unit -by -unit. The contractor should provide a proposed schedule for completion of gas service work to at least 1DOmanufactured housing units; the man hours estimated tocomplete the project; onU.Ule number ofcontractor's licensed personnel that will beassigned tothis project. Contractor Selection One or more contractors will be selected by the City to complete the project. Selection of the contractor(s) will be based upon the sum of the following criteria: 1. Contractor's understanding nfthe tasks proposed above as reflected in the contractor's written proposal, 2. Contractor's experience with similar work, particularly with manufactured housing. 3. Contractor's proposed charges per unit hocomplete the required work. 4. Contractor's schedule for completion ofthe work. We would sincerely appreciate your indication of interest in this contract by advising the City of your interest by Email otJirn.88cNmmnare@LwkeE|mnm.org. or by FAX at851'777-551O by March 15.2OO5.The schedule for this RFPprocess is: 1. Request for Proposal will be mailed by the City of Lake Elmo to prospective consultants bvFebruary 25.2OO5; 2. Contractors submit written proposals by — March 25.2OO5 3. Lake Elmo Building Inspector will Certify Qualified Contractors by — April 8, 2005 4. Notice ofSelection and Contract Offer(m)—April 15.2OO5 Thank you for your interest in providing contract services to the City of Lake Elmo on this important project. Please direct any questions you may have regarding this solicitation to Jim McNamara, Lake Elmo Building Official mtGS1-77T-5510. ChadeoE. Oi|kanud