Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutPZ MINUTES 06-13-221 City of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting City Council Chambers – 3800 Laverne Avenue North Minutes of Regular Meeting of June 13, 2022 CALL TO ORDER: Commission Chair Risner called to order the meeting of the Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Mueller STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director Just, City Planner Ben Hetzel Approve Agenda: M/S/P: Risner / Steil made a motion to approve the agenda with amendments. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Approve Minutes: M/S/P: Steil / Rehkamp made a motion to approve the 5-9-22, 5-23-22. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. Public Hearings: a. VARIANCE- 1567 Ivory Avenue N side yard setback for an accessory structure. Al Woolhouse (Applicant) on behalf of Brenda LeCuyer (Property Owner) recently submitted an application for a side yard setback variance for the property located at 1567 Ivory Avenue N located in the subdivision of Parkview Estates Open Space PUD– Parcel 28.029.21.13.0015 (Subject Property). The property owner is proposing to construct a detached garage to the southeast of the existing home and southwest of an existing in-ground pool and patio. To do this, the applicants are requesting to encroach within the 15 foot side yard setback as required by the Open Space PUD zoning district. The proposed garage would be placed at the end of an existing driveway and abut a 5-foot drainage and utility easement located along the south property line. The applicant is requesting the maximum relief from the setback while not placing the structure within the drainage and utility easement. City Planner Hetzel Just gave presentation and answered questions on the proposed variance. In advance of the public hearing staff received 4 public comments from neighbors, three in support and one against the proposed variance. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend denial of the request from Al Woolhouse on behalf of Brenda LeCuyer for a variance to reduce the side yard setback to 5 feet where a minimum of 15 feet is required at 1567 Ivory Avenue N. Applicant Al LeCuyer and Brenda LeCuyer (1567 Ivory Avenue North) spoke regarding the need for this variance. And answered questions. Public hearing opened at 7:21 PM. 2 No comments from the public. Public hearing closed at 7:22 PM. FINDINGS OF FACT: The applicant states that meeting the required setback near the desired building location would involve the removal and replacement of a portion of professional landscaping and create a visible obstruction of an immovable playset. In addition, meeting the 15 foot setback would result in an obstruction in front of the proposed garage door due to the existing well location. The applicant is aware of the possibility to connect to city water, but also understands that it may not be required. The applicant claims that the garage cannot be built on the north side of the home due to HOA rules and septic system components. The City does not enforce HOA rules and only requires accessory structure placement to be in the side or rear yard. City code would define the front yard to the west and side yard to the north. The City has documentation indicating that the referred to septic system is located on outlot E on the other side of Ivory Ave N allowing for buildable area to the north. The applicant has not proven that unique circumstances that justify the need for a variance were not created by the property owners. While the existing well location may not have been determined by the current property owners, there is no clarification whether the property owners are responsible for the professional landscape placement or playset location. The applicant has the opportunity to connect to city water and abandon the well, which would allow the proposed garage to meet the 15 foot side yard setback. The property owner would be establishing a self-created hardship by deciding not to connect to city water. The proposed garage location would not alter the essential character of the surrounding area. The garage would be located in the rear yard. The structure would be screened from the neighboring homes to the northeast and southeast by existing trees. The other neighboring home to the southwest would be approximately 113 feet from the proposed garage. The proposed variance does not impair adjacent properties. The proposed addition will not face a public street and is screened from 2 out of 3 adjacent properties by existing vegetation. The building location would also be screened from Ivory Ave due to existing trees at the driveway entrance and the existing home location. Approval of the variance would not result in increased public street congestion or diminished property values. M/S/P: Graen/Vrieze moved to recommend approval of the request from Al Woolhouse on behalf of the property owner Brenda LeCuyer for a variance to reduce the side yard setbacks to 5 feet where a minimum of 15 feet is required at 1567 Ivory Avenue North with the recommended conditions. Vote: 3-2 (Steil & Rehkamp – Nay) Motion carried (Risner, Graen, & Vrieze are in support of the location of the garage and this variance. Steil feels this should not be approved as it doesn’t fit city guidelines. Rehkamp does not believe they meet the qualifications of the variance. Mueller was absent.) b. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT- Animal Inn Training LLC is requesting an amendment to Table 12-1 of Section 105.12.920 to allow Commercial Kennel as a conditional use in the Limited Commercial zoning district. Katie and Corwin Cheng, owners of Animal Inn Training LLC, recently submitted an application for a Zoning Text Amendment to amend Table 12-1 of LEC 105.12.920. Animal Inn Training is an existing legal non-conforming commercial kennel that offers pet boarding, training, and grooming services. The current zoning of the property is Limited Commercial, which does not allow for Commercial Kennels as a permitted use or conditional use. Nonconforming uses may be continued through repair, replacement, restoration, maintenance, or improvement. However, continuation of a nonconforming use does not include expansion. The applicants wish to expand in the future. In order to expand, the applicant must receive approval of a Zoning Text Amendment and a conditional use permit (CUP) amendment. City Planner Hetzel Just gave presentation and answered questions on the proposed text amendment. 3 Applicant Katie Cheng, 8611 34th St N, spoke regarding the reason for the text amendment change request. Public hearing opened at 7:45 PM. No comments from the public. Public hearing closed at 7:45 PM. FINDINGS OF FACT: The proposed amendment would only affect the Animal Inn property, the Prairie Ridge Office Park directly east, and the surrounding properties. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan has Animal Inn and the Prairie Ridge Office Park guided for Limited Business (LB) according to the Future Land Use Map. Once again, these are the only properties designated for the LB district. The land directly to the west is guided for Business Park (BP), which is has similar allowed uses and serves a similar purpose. There would be minimal impact on the other surrounding properties as the land to the north and south is guided for residential development, but separated by Stillwater Boulevard and railroad property. The proposed amendment would not impact the subdivision code. The amendment does meet the purpose of the Limited Commercial district by offering a basic convenience type service to the neighborhoods in the area that are not planned for public sanitary sewer services. In addition, there are uses that provide similar uses allowed in the Limited Commercial district. For example, a day care center is allowed as a conditional use and Veterinary Services is listed as a permitted use as per Table 12-1. By allowing commercial kennels as a conditional use, any new or expansions of commercial kennels would have to be reviewed by city staff and be in conformance with the Lake Elmo Design Guidelines and Standards Manual as stated by LEC 105.12.960. Meeting these design guidelines and standards follow the intent of the Limited Commercial district. M/S/P: Steil/Graen moved to recommend approval of a of the request from Animal Inn Training LLC to amend Table 12-1 of LEC 105.12.920 to allow a Commercial Kennel as a Conditional Use in the Limited Commercial district. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. (Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) c. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT- City initiated amendment to add a minimum 40 foot setback for buildings along 5th Street North, Hudson Boulevard, Inwood Avenue, Keats Avenue, Lake Elmo Avenue, and Manning Avenue. Amended sections to include Section 105.12.930; Section 105.12.720; Section 105.12.880. The City Council has directed the Planning Department to pursue amendments to the Medium Density Residential (MDR) and High Density Residential (HDR) zoning districts. As development has been proposed and occurred along the new 5th Street in the South Planning Area, some buildings have been located closer to the public way than others. With the varying land use densities and intensities planned for 5th Street this is an opportunity to guide building placement along this new local street. Director Just gave presentation and answered questions on the proposed zoning text amendments. Public hearing opened at 8:17 PM. No comments from the public. Public hearing closed at 8:17 PM. M/S/P: Risner/Steil moved to recommend adoption of the zoning text amendments to incorporate an increased building set back from the named streets in Section 105.12.720 Urban Residential Districts of Lot Dimensions and Buildings and Bulk Requirements. Vote: 4-1 (Graen – Nay) Motion carried. (Graen thinks that it is the private 4 property owner’s rights to develop their land with the current setbacks. Risner, Steil, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) M/S/P: Steil/Risner moved to recommend adoption of the zoning text amendments to incorporate an increased building setback for residential uses from the named streets in Section 105.12.930 Commercial Districts of Lot Dimensions and Buildings and Bulk Requirements. Vote: 4-1 (Graen – Nay) Motion carried. (Graen thinks that it is the private property owner’s rights to develop their land with the current setbacks. Risner, Steil, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) M/S/P: Vrieze/Rehkamp moved to recommend adoption of the zoning text amendments to incorporate an increased building set back from the named streets in Section 105.12.880 Mixed-Use Commercial and Mixed-Use Business Park Districts of Lot Dimensions and Buildings and Bulk Requirements. Vote: 4-1 (Graen– Nay) Motion carried. (Graen thinks that it is the private property owner’s rights to develop their land with the current setbacks. Risner, Steil, Rehkamp, were all in favor. Mueller was absent) d. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT- City initiated text amendment to require a minimum mix of uses in the Mixed-Use Commercial and Mixed-Use Business Park Districts. Amended sections to include Section 105.12.850; Section 105.12.860; Section 105.12.870. The City Council has directed the Planning Department to pursue amendments to the Mixed Use Commercial (MU- C) and Mixed Use Business Park (MU-BP) zoning districts. The purpose of the MU-C district is to promote mixed use development that supports a mix of retail, commercial and residential uses that benefit from their proximity to each other. Similarly, MU-BP promotes development in the city that will have a mix of general business, business park and residential uses which allows for better integration of uses and more flexibility to respond to market demands. Director Just gave presentation and answered questions on the proposed zoning text amendments. Public hearing opened at 8:34 PM. No comments from the public. Public hearing closed at 8:34 PM. M/S/P: Rehkamp/Steil moved to recommend adoption of the zoning test amendments to require a minimum mix of uses in the Mixed Use Commercial and Mixed Use Business Park zoning districts. Vote: 2-3 (Graen & Risner, Vrieze – Nay) Motion failed (Graen doesn’t think there is a need for this as there is no demand for Mixed use, he doesn’t think that the city should be legislating that there needs to be, as this would affect the existing owners and could force an in-cohesive mixed uses development. Vrieze agreed with Graen. Risner was not in favor of forcing a Mixed Use. Rehkamp and Steil agree that this will provide a variety of options to a developer. Mueller was absent) e. ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT- City initiated text amendment to Article XIII Village Mixed-Use District. Incorporate Village Medium Density Residential (V-MDR) and Village High Density Residential (V-HDR) into City Code. Amended sections to include Section 105.12.770; Section 105.12.780; Section 105.12.790; Section 105.12.820 The City of Lake Elmo Planning Department has initiated a zoning text amendment of Article XIII Village Mixed Use District to incorporate the Village Medium Density Residential (V-MDR) and Village High Density Residential (V-HDR) zoning districts into the City Code. The incorporation of these districts is in implementation of the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. The 2040 Comprehensive Plan recommends creation of strong and vibrant districts in the Village Planning Area so that it becomes a destination for all residents of the community. 5 Director Just gave presentation and answered questions on the proposed zoning text amendments. Public hearing opened at 9:01 PM. No comments from the public. Public hearing closed at 9:01 PM. M/S/P: Rehkamp/Graen move to recommend approval of the proposed text amendments to Article XIII Village Mixed Use District to incorporate the V-MDR and V-HDR zoning districts into the City Code. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. (Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) New/Unfinished Business: a. PRELIMINARY PLAT & PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, ZONING MAP AMENDMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT - 9450 Hudson Boulevard. Dominik Jenson, representing SRD 2.0, LLC, is requesting approval of a zoning map amendment (rezoning), preliminary planned unit development (PUD) and preliminary plat for the property located on the north side of Hudson Boulevard, west of Julia Avenue (9450 Hudson Boulevard). The plat depicts two parcels and the PUD depicts a 190-unit apartment building on one parcel and a daycare center, known as the Goddard School, on the other parcel. Brad Coats of the Goldridge Companies is requesting approval of a conditional use permit for the daycare center on the rezoned property. Daycare centers are allowed by conditional use permit in the Mixed-Use Commercial District. The daycare center would be licensed by the Washington County for up to 188 children and would be limited to providing daycare and preschool between the hours of 6:30 am and 6:30 pm Monday through Friday. Director Just gave presentation and answered questions. FINDINGS OF FACT FOR REZONING: That the proposed rezoning will be consistent with the land use designation of the site which is MU-C (mixed use commercial) as depicted in the 2040 Comprehensive Plan. M/S/P: Rehkamp/Graen Move to recommend approval of the rezoning of the site of the proposed multifamily building and daycare center at 9450 Hudson Boulevard from RT (rural transitional) to MU-C (mixed use commercial) based on the findings listed in the staff report. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. (Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) FINDINGS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: 1. The proposed use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort, convenience, or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city. 2. The use or development conforms to the city comprehensive plan. 3. The use or development is compatible with the existing neighborhood. 4. The proposed use meets all specific development standards. 5. If the proposed use is in a floodplain management or shore land area, the proposed use meets all the standards. 6 6. The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated, and maintained so it will not change the essential character of that area. 7. The proposed use will not be hazardous or create a nuisance to existing or future neighboring structures. 8. The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services, including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and sewer systems and schools or will be served adequately by such facilities and services provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use. 9. The proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community. 10. The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment, and conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, property or the general welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare, or odors. 11. Vehicular approaches to the property will not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares. 12. The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss, or damage of a natural or scenic features of major importance. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. The daycare center shall remain licensed at all times and for no more than 188 children 2. The daycare center and preschool hours of operation shall occur between 6:30 am and 6:30 pm Monday through Friday. 3. Prior to opening the daycare center and preschool the applicant shall provide evidence of licensure. 4. No City permits for work related to the daycare center/preschool shall be issued until the public improvements for the approved plat and PUD have been found complete and are accepted by the City. M/S/P: Steil/Vrieze move to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit for the proposed Goddard School daycare center for 188 children at 9450 Hudson Boulevard based on the findings and conditions listed in the staff report. This approval will be subject to the City approving the proposed zoning map amendment from RT (rural transitional) to MU-C (mixed use commercial). Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. (Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) FINDINGS FOR PRELIMINARY PLAT/PRELIMINARY PUD: 1. That the preliminary PUD Plan would be consistent with the intent of the 2040 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the 2040 Land Use Map for this area. 2. That the preliminary PUD Plan complies with the general intent of the Mixed Use Commercial zoning district with PUD modifications. 3. That the preliminary PUD Plan generally complies with the City’s Zoning Code except for parking setbacks from a residential zone, parking placement for the daycare center, and the maximum allowed density. 7 4. That the preliminary PUD Plan generally complies with the Lake Elmo Design Guidelines and Standards Manual. 5. That the preliminary plat generally complies with the City’s Subdivision regulations. 6. That the preliminary plat generally complies with the City’s design standards. 7. That the preliminary plat generally complies with the City’s Zoning Code. 8. That the preliminary PUD Plan must be revised to be consistent with the City’s engineering standards and as noted in the City Engineer’s memorandum. 9. That the preliminary PUD Plan must be revised to be consistent with the City’s landscape plan and tree replacement standards pursuant to the Landscape Architects memo. 10. That the preliminary PUD Plan must be revised to be consistent with the City’s fire department memo. 11. That the preliminary PUD Plan meets the minimum requirements for a PUD including minimum lot area, open space and street layout. 12. That the preliminary PUD Plan meets one or more of the required PUD objectives identified in Article 18 including providing: Planned unit developments should not be allowed simply for the purpose of increasing overall density or allowing development that otherwise could not be approved. a. Innovation in land development techniques that may be more suitable for a given parcel than conventional approaches. b. Promotion of integrated land uses, allowing for a mixture of residential, commercial, and public facilities. c. Provision of more adequate, usable, and suitably located open space, recreational amenities, natural resource protection and other public facilities than would otherwise be provided under conventional land development techniques. d. Accommodation of housing of all types with convenient access to employment opportunities and/or commercial facilities; and especially to create additional opportunities for senior and affordable housing. e. Preservation and enhancement of important environmental features through careful and sensitive placement of buildings and facilities. f. Preservation of historic buildings, structures or landscape features. g. Coordination of architectural styles and building forms to achieve greater compatibility within the development and surrounding land uses. h. Creation of more efficient provision of public utilities and services, lessened demand on transportation, and the promotion of energy resource conservation. i. Allowing the development to operate in concert with a redevelopment plan in certain areas of the City and to ensure the redevelopment goals and objectives will be achieved. j. Higher standards of site and building design than would otherwise be provided under conventional land development technique. 8 13. That the preliminary PUD Plan includes amenities that may be worthy of amenity points to increase the overall housing density in the development from a max of 15 units per acre to 15.57 units per acre. The qualifying amenity is the provision of underground parking to reduce the amount of impervious surface. Per code requirements, the proposed underground parking reduces the amount of surface parking stalls located outside of the footprint of the principal structure by a minimum of 25 percent. For every additional five percent of surface parking stalls reduced above 25 percent the applicant may be awarded one additional amenity point, up to a max of 10 amenity points or a 10% increase in density. See Article 18, Table 16-2. RECOMMENDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: 1. That the City approves a Zoning Map Amendment to rezone the site from rural area development (RAD) to MU-C (mixed use commercial). 2. That the future final plat and final PUD plans would be for the parcel with the PID 34.029.21.34.0012. 3. That the application for final plat and final PUD Plans identify all requests for flexibility from the City Code. 4. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete, before approval of the subject Conditional Use permit, and before approval of the subject rezoning, the developers of the subject property and the subject buildings and prospective owners of each parcel shall submit in writing an agreement outlining responsibility for construction of on and off-site improvements and a formal recognition of the implications of delays or default by either party. 5. That the final plat and PUD plan depict a shared parking and access easement across the plat and that prior to release of the final plat the applicant shall provide to the City a recorded shared parking, access and maintenance agreement for all parcels on the plat. 6. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete the applicant shall address all comments in the City Engineer’s memo dated June 8, 2022 to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 7. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete the applicant shall resubmit the storm water management plan and it shall be found complete to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 8. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete the applicant shall revise the landscape plan to meet Article VIII Environmental Performance Standards in accordance with the City Landscape Architect’s memo dated June 9, 2022 to the satisfaction of the City Landscape Architect. 9. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete the applicant shall resolve the following to the satisfaction of the Fire Chief. A. From their April 28, 2022 memo - All roads and drive lanes shall meet the Lake Elmo Fire Department requirements for widths and turning radiuses. The turning radius plan overlay has been provided. Following review of the submitted turning radius overlay, several areas exist where the turning radius overlay extends past the curb line and shall be addressed. i. Comments to my concerns about the turning radius overlay extending past the curb line have not been addressed or discussed. Additional information shall be provided to the fire department regarding curb type and drivability in these areas. B. Final approval of fire hydrant locations shall be made in coordination with engineering and public works. 9 C. Currently the water supply is proposed as a combined fire/domestic water main. Additional information and discussion shall be provided regarding the combined services prior to any system approvals. The fire department prefers the domestic water supply and the fire suppression water supply be two separate mains. I recommend that the fire department meet with the developer and the fire suppression engineer to review. 10. That prior to the City finding any application for final plat and PUD plan complete the applicant shall demonstrate that the plans reflect compliance with South Washington Watershed District (SWWD) preliminary review comments and that the applicant provide the City evidence that all conditions attached to a SWWD permit will be met before the starting any grading activity on the site. 11. That the applicant shall obtain all necessary permits including but not limited to all applicable City permits (building, grading, sign, etc.), NPDES/SWPPP permits and South Washington Watershed District approval before starting any grading or construction activities. 12. The applicant/developer is responsible, at their own expense, for installing all required improvements in and adjacent to Julia Avenue and Hudson Boulevard. 13. The Final Plat/Final PUD shall include all necessary and additional public right-of-way and easements for Hudson Boulevard and Julia Avenue. 14. All storm water facilities internal to the site shall be privately owned and maintained. A storm water maintenance and easement agreement in a form acceptable to the City shall be executed and recorded with the final plat. 15. The Preliminary Plat/Preliminary PUD approval is conditioned upon the applicant meeting all City standards and design requirements unless specifically addressed otherwise in these conditions. 16. That the PUD overlay zoning allow for the following: A. A 20 foot parking setback from a residential zone (on the northern property line); B. Parking located between the daycare building and the street (Julia Avenue); C. Residential density at 15.57 units per acre. D. The maximum building height shall be 50 feet. 17. If necessary, the applicant shall provide the City with a copy of written permission for any off-site grading work and storm sewer discharges to adjacent properties before starting any site work, grading and as part of any final plat or final PUD application. 18. Prior to finding an application for final plat and PUD plan complete that the applicant or developer shall submit a photometric plan for the development for staff review and approval. All lighting must meet the requirements of the City Code. 19. Before the installation or construction of any subdivision identification signs or neighborhood markers within the development, the developer shall submit sign plans to the City for review and obtain a sign permit from the City. 20. Before the execution and recording of a final plat for the development, the developer or applicant shall enter into a Developer’s Agreement or a Site Work Agreement with the City. Such an Agreement must be approved by the City Attorney and by the City Council. The Agreement shall delineate who is responsible 10 for the design, construction and payment for the required improvements with financial guarantees therefore. The Agreement shall outline any approved phasing plan. 21. The applicant or developer shall enter into a separate grading agreement with the City before starting any grading activity in advance of final plat of PUD approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat or final PUD, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 22. That the City does not allow any parking or construction staging, including the loading and unloading of materials and equipment at any time on Hudson Boulevard or Julia Avenue during the construction of the site improvements and building. 23. That the applicant shall submit revised preliminary plat and project plans meeting all conditions of approval for City review and approval. The revised applicant/developer project plans and other materials shall meet all of the above conditions before the City will find complete any final plat or final PUD application for the development and before the start of any clearing or grading activity on the site. 24. That the City’s preliminary plat/preliminary PUD approval is good for one year from the date of City Council action, unless the applicant requests and the City Council approves a time extension. M/S/P: Vrieze/Steil Move to recommend approval of the preliminary PUD plan and preliminary plat as requested by Dominek Jensen (of SRD2.0 LLC) for PID:34.029.21.34.0012 for a plat with two parcels and to include two buildings at 9450 Hudson Boulevard based on the findings of fact and 24 recommend conditions of approval listed in the staff report. Vote: 5-0, motion carried unanimously. (Risner, Steil, Graen, Rehkamp, Vrieze were all in favor. Mueller was absent) Communications/Updates June 7, 2022 City Council Approved: a. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A POOL AND FITNESS CENTER - 11441 20th St. N b. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS – Addition to the MUSA and change in land use designation for Approximately 110 acres of City property at the northeast corner of 34th Street and Ideal Avenue. (both the MUSA expansion and land use changes) c. ZONING AMENDMENTS - Zoning Code, §400 Fencing Regulations (with amendments for clarity). Building Regulations Code, §160 Swimming Pools (as-is). General Provisions, §040 Required Screening (as-is). d. Kyle and Morgan Traynor, 4622 Lilac Lane N – Variance. Upcoming Meetings a. June 23rd, 2022 b. July 11th, 2022 Meeting adjourned at 9:30 PM. Respectfully submitted, Diane Wendt Permit Technician