HomeMy WebLinkAbout#20 - Pavement Condition Evaluation STAFF REPORT
DATE: June 15, 2021
CONSENT
AGENDA ITEM: Approve Contract with GoodPointe Technology for Pavement Condition
Evaluation Services
SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer and Marty Powers, Public Works Director REVIEWED BY: Kristina Handt, City Administrator Chad Isakson, Assistant City Engineer
ISSUE BEFORE COUNCIL: Should the City Council approve a contract with GoodPointe Technology for Pavement Condition Evaluation Services? BACKGROUND: Developing and implementing a systematic pavement management program enables a
community to more effectively plan and program maintenance and rehabilitation strategies for the public street and pavement assets. A good pavement management program will help to provide more accurate and accessible information on the pavement network, will better track pavement performance, will help to better
predict funding needs and will make more efficient use of available resources. In addition, the data driven process will improve communications between staff and the city council for the purpose of establishing and supporting the proper funding and budget levels.
A good Pavement Management Program will consist of the following elements: 1. A current and accurate street and pavement inventory. 2. Condition Assessment for each street segment, updated every 3 years. 3. Repair/maintenance strategies with cost estimates. 4. Prioritization methodology. 5. Process for creating and evaluating maintenance/rehabilitation budgets. The key to strategic maintenance planning is in knowing the current condition of the various elements of your infrastructure network and understanding how it is changing with time and in response to the ongoing maintenance, repair, and rehabilitation efforts. PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: In 2016 the city retained GoodPointe Technology to conduct a city-wide street inventory and pavement condition assessment using the PCI rating system. The pavement
management information was uploaded to ICON, an Infrastructure CONsultant relational database management program that is used to manage and track the condition of the city’s physical pavements, signs, and any other miscellaneous infrastructure assets located in the public right of way. Proposals were then
obtained in 2018 to begin re-rating parts of the city street pavements on a bi-annual basis in a manner to maintain current condition assessments for accurate reporting and evaluation. However, due to staff and council turnover, the 2018 condition assessments were not supported by the budget.
To better ensure that the city is investing its maintenance and reconstruction dollars more strategically for extending the serviceable life of the city pavements, staff is recommending that the pavement condition assessment and inventory be updated in 2021. The proposal also includes consulting services to be provided by GoodPointe Technology to assist the city with setup and training on the ICON database system so that
the system can be maintained over time. The updated rating/inventory will provide the city with a current
and accurate street inventory and condition assessment that will be accessible to Public Works and Engineering for ongoing updates, capital improvement planning and annual street maintenance programming.
FISCAL IMPACT: $20,900 to be paid from the Street Maintenance Fund. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve a contract with GoodPointe Technology for Pavement Condition Evaluation Services. The recommended motion for the action is as follows: “Move to approve a contract with GoodPointe Technology for Pavement Condition Evaluation Services in a not to exceed amount of $20,900”. ATTACHMENTS:
1. GoodPointe Technology Professional Services Proposal dated June 7, 2021.
Network Level
Pavement Condition Evaluation for the
City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Version A.2 Submitted June 7, 2021
GoodPointe Technology
287 E. 6th Street, Suite 200
St. Paul, MN 55101
www.goodpointe.com
June 7, 2021
Mr. Marty Powers
Public Works Director
3880 Laverne Ave N
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
Dear Marty:
Re: A.2 Proposal for Pavement Evaluation Consulting Services
for the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
We are pleased to present the following scope of work and related cost proposal to
perform the above-referenced project for roadway pavements under the jurisdiction of
the City of Lake Elmo. This revised version A.2 reflects the input of City engineer Jack
Griffin from Friday June 4, 2021.
All official correspondence during this project may be directed to:
Tony Kadlec President
Phone: (651) 726-2555
Fax: (651) 726-2545
E-mail: tkadlec@goodpointe.com
We appreciate the opportunity to work with you on this project, and we look forward to
providing high quality pavement and infrastructure management consulting services!
Sincerely,
GoodPointe Technology
Anthony J. Kadlec
President
Attachments:
Technical Scope of Work
Proposed Cost Estimate
\proposal\Lake Elmo\GoodPointe Technology_PCI Rating_A.2_06072021.pdf
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 1
1. Firm Information
We are pleased to submit the following information on our company and the services
we can provide for this project:
WHY SELECT GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY FOR THIS PROJECT?
Simply put, the collection of high-quality pavement condition data and the
implementation of pavement and related infrastructure asset management systems is
what we do for a living, day in and day out. We take pride in building and
maintaining long-term client relationships and supporting our clients with their use of
their pavement management software and through the delivery of high- quality
pavement condition data.
Our project team includes staff with vast experience to deliver exceptional value
above and beyond the data that is collected and delivered in this project.
OUR FIRM
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. (GoodPointe) appreciates this opportunity to serve the
City of Lake Elmo and to present the qualifications of our firm.
GoodPointe has the extensive knowledge in necessary to perform this work efficiently
and effectively. Our firm provides a wealth of experience that has already served the
needs of a variety of local governmental clients throughout the state of Minnesota,
across North America, and around the world.
Our clients include cities, counties, state DOTs,
telecommunication companies, utility companies,
and transportation agencies. To date, we have
processed more than 500,000 miles of digital right
of way data collection, mapping, road geometry
and asset inventory on roads and rails throughout North America and Asia since 1999.
INTRODUCING GOODPOINTE TECHNOLOGY
GoodPointe Technology (GoodPointe) is one of the leading infrastructure
management systems- engineering and software-consulting firms in North America.
The core mission of GoodPointe is to develop and provide high-quality roadway
maintenance management software and system consulting services to clients in the
government and private sector.
We help the authorities of public and private infrastructure/facilities to more
effectively meet their management and maintenance needs by providing powerful,
flexible, and easy to use management system software and implementation services.
Our management system implementation services include:
x Strategic capital improvement project planning and needs analysis for your
local conditions;
x Data transfer and design of infrastructure condition data collection services;
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 2
x Digital Right of Way imaging data collection and integration services;
x Infrastructure system performance analysis;
x Software Development and Implementation Services;
x GIS Consulting, Crystal Reports Development, and System Training Services;
x Generating budget investment and deferred maintenance analysis scenarios;
and,
x The development of short-term and long-term infrastructure maintenance,
repair, and rehabilitation plans.
To summarize: we design, develop, market, implement, and maintain maintenance
management software systems used by businesses, government agencies and other
organizations. The use of these systems enables responsible officials to more cost-
effectively manage assets. These assets include highways, county roads, city streets,
sidewalks, curb and gutter, signs and signals, lighting systems, bridges, parking lots,
wastewater and storm drainage systems, water pipelines, park features and other
miscellaneous assets.
OUR PHILOSOPHY
We realize that understanding and effectively resolving today's increasingly complex
infrastructure problems requires an experienced, interdisciplinary team of
professionals. Pavement and related infrastructure management systems no longer
present single-issue solutions but interdependent ones that cross technical,
departmental, regulatory, and provincial boundaries. That is why we take an
integrated, interdisciplinary approach to help our clients meet these challenges.
We take great pride in delivering high-quality infrastructure management software
and system data to our clients, and we encourage you to contact our references to
verify our claim as you perform your due diligence in consideration of this project.
Since we work on "both sides of this equation", we realize it is not good enough to
implement our industry leading software (or any other third party software program)
with average quality data. Nor will it suffice to have the world’s best data reside
within a software program that is difficult to use, maintain, and cannot model the
local dynamics that challenge your infrastructure system.
OUR PEOPLE
Our personnel have been developing successful pavement management
consultation relationships with local, national, and international government agencies
since the 1980’s. Our team for this project includes staff whose work has advanced
the technology of infrastructure management science in North America and the rest
of the world. We believe our experience in the field of pavement management
science, management system implementations, and our experience in knowing how
to work well with governmental agencies across the world, demonstrates our strong
commitment to serving clients like you.
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 3
Role in this Project: GoodPointe will serve as the sole contractor and will perform the
visual surface rating survey specified for this project.
GoodPointe Technology is headquartered in St. Paul, Minnesota, and has offices
located regionally across North America, Europe, and Asia.
2. Project Outline
The project deliverables shall include the following:
Task A. Pavement Condition Survey
Perform a detailed pavement surface condition evaluation that identifies pavement
distress type, quantity, severity, and extent expressed as a percent. The roadway
pavements to be evaluated in this project will be identified in an ESRI ArcGIS
shapefile, to total approximately 70 centerline miles. NOTE: the approximately 20 miles
of roadways constructed since 2016 will NOT be field surveyed under this task, but will
be assigned a ‘No-Distress’ survey with a 2021 survey date.
General Survey Methodology
The PCI is a numerical expression of a pavement condition rating system which was
initially developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The PCI methodology is used
nationwide and is endorsed by the American Public Works Association (APWA), the
Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), the U.S. Military, and has been standardized by
the American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM).
The surface condition assessment for this project will be based upon the standard
survey condition methodology as defined in the ASTM 6433-11, by the American
Society for Testing and Materials. The assessment will provide a Pavement Condition
Index (PCI) for each pavement section defined in this project.
GoodPointe Technology uses the PCI methodology as the basis for the majority of our
pavement management system implementations because it provides a reliable and
repeatable methodology, which follows nationally established definitions, procedures,
and provides the greatest utility for pavement rehabilitation analysis.
Survey Methodology Proposed for This Project
GoodPointe Technology will use the most current set of available data to perform the
field survey of physical pavement features. Using a relational database of inventory
sections, which will be prepared for this project, GoodPointe Technology will generate
data collection forms to be used for executing the survey.
If there are historical records of pavement construction/maintenance projects that
have most recently been performed, then please include the construction, and/or
maintenance project (type of maintenance and date of project) for the relevant
inventory record(s) for the pavement sections to be evaluated in the project.
The proposed survey will cover the surface of the specified roadway pavement
section(s) using the PCI/Street Saver survey procedure in conjunction with the
sampling procedures specified for this project. Data entry will be performed
concurrently with the pavement surface condition data collection process.
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 4
For the bituminous pavements within the selected area of evaluation, the following
pavement surface condition distresses and their related quantities will be recorded:
x Alligator Cracking x Depression x Patching x Shoving
x Bleeding x Edge Cracking x Polished Aggregate x Slippage Cracking
x Block Cracking x Joint Reflection Cracking x Potholes x Swell
x Bumps and Sags x Lane/Shoulder Drop Off x Railroad Crossing x Weathering/ Raveling
x Corrugation x Long. & Trans. Cracking x Rutting
Other Right of Way Data to be Verified/Updated in this Project
In addition to collecting the PCI data in this project, we will field verify/update the
following data, which was initially collected in our previous 2016 survey:
1. Roadway Pavement Width (e.g. pavement edge to pavement edge,
measured to the nearest tenth of a foot, rounded to the nearest foot);
2. Curb & Gutter Inventory (e.g. yes/no/partial extent of the primary curb type
present on the roadway section). The list of curb attributes to be extracted will
be developed with, confirmed/finalized by the City.
3. Shoulder Width (e.g. if a shoulder is present, the material type (gravel, AC) and
total width will be measured; if no shoulder is present, a rating of ‘none’ will be
recorded).
Task 1. Deliverable
o Data entered into City’s ICON system, deliver digital MS Excel
spreadsheet of tabulated survey results for each pavement inventory
section (street block) to City.
Task B. ICON Premium Consulting Agreement
Under this task GoodPointe will provide value-added consulting effort under this task
based on the specific needs of the City. This work may include a combination of the
following task/deliverables:
x Holding a conference call with the City to confirm the City’s needs for this
project.
x Assisting the City with the establishment of the approximately twenty (20)
centerline miles of City asset inventory (e.g. attributing the inventory (from/to)
termini for the City roadway network) added since the 2016 survey.
x Transferring and/or update the pre-existing geocode link/asset data from the
City’s legacy and/or third-party database system(s).
x Providing onsite or online ICON system training for City staff designated to work
with the system.
x Entering/importing the paving projects completed in recent years, registering
the improved condition into the ICON database.
x Receiving and entering the City's Proposed Capital Improvement Projects (CIP
List) and proposed project costs into the Predetermined Plan of ICON.
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 5
x Updating the ICON program to reflect the City's current asset management
policies, paving strategies, application parameters, unit costs, etc.
x Reviewing/Updating the pavement performance curves to be loaded in ICON
based on actual City pavement performance data.
x Assisting the City with using the ICON Budget Analysis Module to run multiple,
multi-year projections (1 to 75 years into the future) to document the projected
average network condition and deferred maintenance backlog results, based
on the data supplied in above items.
x Documenting the Trends in Pavement Condition, queried out of the historical
database tables of ICON.
x Including the scenario results run in an executive summary report.
x Generating GIS mapping data and/or PowerPoint presentation materials for
elected officials.
Note:
The above items are offered as a preliminary suggestion of work objectives for the City
under this project. GoodPointe will work with your staff to define/refine the set of
deliverables under this task. GoodPointe will provide an ongoing report of the
consulting effort provided under this task throughout the duration of the project. Out
of pocket expenses (e.g. billable project mileage ($0.75/mile) will be billed separately.
3. Time Schedule
At the writing of this proposal, the preliminary schedule for this project, assuming
written notice to proceed on or before June 30th is to deliver proposed services on or
before October 31, 2021.
Please note: a delay in the notice to proceed date may require an adjustment in the
estimated date of completion for this project.
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 6
4. Compensation
Task A. Pavement Condition Survey: 70 centerline miles @$240/centerline mile,
$16,800
Task B. ICON Premium Consulting Agreement: Forty (40) Hour package,
$100/hour, $4,000.00
Estimated Out of Pocket Expenses: billable mileage for onsite meetings will be
billed at $0.75/mile, not to exceed $100.00
Proposed not-to-exceed cost: $20,900.00
This cost estimate is based on providing the services described under the version A.2
Scope of Services, and Proposed Cost Schedule dated June 7, 2021. The cost
estimate will not be exceeded without additional authorization from your
organization.
Out of pocket expenses such as billable project mileage for onsite meetings will be
billed at $0.75/mile.
The hourly or unit cost presented in this contract is based on the scope of services
described and the assumption that the project will be completed within one year
from the signature date. If the project cannot be completed within the proposed
schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, revising the unit costs may be
required for completion of the remaining tasks.
GoodPointe Technology Proposal A.2 June 7, 2021
City of Lake Elmo, MN
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com Page 7
Signature Page: please sign, scan and email to tkadlec@goodpointe.com
Attention: Tony Kadlec, GoodPointe Technology
Re: City of Lake Elmo
Pavement Evaluation Project
RE: INFRASTRUCTURE MANAGMENT SYSTEM PROFESSIONAL SERVICES The agreement is based on providing the services described under Exhibit A.2 Scope of Work for the City of Lake Elmo, dated June 7, 2021. The project budget will not be exceeded without the additional authorization from the client. The hourly or unit cost presented in this contract is based on the scope of services described and the assumption that the project will be completed within one year from the signature date. If the project cannot be completed within the proposed schedule due to circumstances beyond our control, revising the unit costs may be required for completion of the remaining tasks. Invoices will be submitted on a monthly basis in accordance with the progress achieved in this project. Terms on payment for services are due immediately upon receipt. GoodPointe Technology appreciates the opportunity to present this contract to you. Please sign this page and return a scanned copy to GoodPointe Technology via email to tkadlec@goodpointe.com. Receipt of the signed agreement will serve as our written authorization to proceed with the proposed scope of work.
Authorization to Proceed: Please proceed according to the described scope of services denoted in Exhibit A.2
Total Authorized Budget: $20,900.00
Date
Client City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota
Authorized Signature
Name
Title
Date June 7, 2021
Authorized Signature
Name Anthony J. Kadlec
Title President
Appendix A. GoodPointe Technology Experience June 7, 2021
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com
GOODPOINTE PROJECT EXPERIENCE
In the last five years, GoodPointe has served as the preferred pavement
management/data collection consultant for the following agencies:
Total Centerline
Miles Agency Coordinate Survey Crews Tabulation of Data Quality Control Review Services Database Management Data Collection Services Point of Contact Department
425 Anoka County, MN x x x x x Mr. Andy Witter Highway Department
422 Arlington County, VA x x x x x Mr. Hung Tran Public Works Department
713 Beltrami County, MN x x x Mr. Bruce Hasbargen Highway Department
366 Chisago County, MN x x x Mr. Joe Triplett Highway Department
28 City of Arden Hills, MN x x x x x Ms. Sally Ricard Engineering Department
399 City of Bloomington, MN x x x x x Mr. Charlie Wild Public Works Department
211 City of Burnsville, MN x x x x x Mr. Jeff Radick Engineering Department
101 City of Champlin, MN x x x x x Ms. Sue Knight Public Works Department
161 City of Chanhassen, MN x x x x x Ms. Alyson Fauske Public Works Department
170 City of Cottage Grove, MN x x x x x Ms. Jennifer Levitt Public Works Department
516 City of Dothan, MN x x x x x Mr. Charles Metzger Engineering Department
444 City of Duluth, MN x x x x x Mr. Chauncey Bangs Engineering Department
228 City of Eagan, MN x x x x x Ms. Sara Pluta Public Works - Streets Department
224 City of Eden Prairie, MN x x x x x Mr. Rod Rue Engineering Department
193 City of Eden Prairie Parks, MN x x x x x Mr. Bill Olmschenk Parks and Recreation
200 City of Edina, MN x x x x x Mr. Carter Schulze Engineering Department
146 City of Elk River, MN x x x Mr. John Anderson Public Works/Engineering
14 City of Falcon Heights, MN x x x x x Ms. Sally Ricard Engineering Department
452 City of Fargo, ND x x x x x Mr. Tom Knakmuhs Engineering Department
111 City of Fergus Falls, MN x x x x x Mr. Brian Yavarow Engineering Department
98 City of Hastings, MN x X x x x Mr. John Caven Engineering Department
57 City of Hopkins, MN x x x x x Mr. Rich Hill Engineering Department
76 City of Hutchinson, MN x x x x x Mr. John Olson Public Works Department
151 City of Inver Grove Heights, MN x x x x x Mr. Scott Thureen Engineering Department
217 City of Maple Grove, MN x x x Mr. Marc Culver Engineering Department
132 City of Maplewood, MN x x x x x Mr. Michael Thompson Public Works Department
1,338 City of Minneapolis, MN x x Mr. Joe Casey Public Works Department
39 City of Mounds View, MN x x Mr. Jim Hess Department of Public Works
63 City of New Hope, MN x x x x x Mr. Guy Johnson Public Works Department
320 City of Newark, NJ x x x Mr. Jason Hahn Michael Baker Jr.
224 City of Norfolk, NE x x x x x Mr. Mark Dolechek Engineering Department
100 City of Northfield, MN x x x x x Mr. David Bennett Public Works Department
286 City of Plymouth, MN x x Mr. Jim Renneberg Engineering Department
131 City of Richfield, MN x x x Mr. Derick Anderson Department of Public Works
53 City of Robbinsdale, MN x x x x x Mr. Richard McCoy Public Works Department
422 City of Rochester, MN x x x x x Mr. Russ Kelm Department of Public Works
120 City of Roseville, MN x x x x x Mr. Pat Dolan Department of Public Works
3800 City of San Antonio, TX x x x x x Mr. Rocky Aranda, Jr. Streets Division, Public Works
108 City of Savage, MN x x x x x Ms. Jeannie Briol Engineering Department
88 City of Shoreview, MN x x x x x Mr. Tom Wesolowski Department of Public Works
83 City of St. Louis Park, MN x x x x x Mr. Scott Merkley Public Works Department
71 City of West St. Paul, MN x x x x x Mr. Ross Beckwith Engineering Department
243 City of Woodbury, MN x x x x x Mr. Tony Kutzke Public Works Department
745 Clay County, MN x x x Mr. Dave Overbo Highway Department
951 Columbus Consolidated Government, GA x x x x x Mr. Farhad AliFarhani Department of Engineering
603 Crow Wing County, MN x x x Mr. Steve Stroschein Highway Department
428 Dakota County, MN x x x Ms. Jodi Ulrich Highway Department
331 Dodge County, MN x x x Ms. Jessica Brennan Highway Department
412 Fillmore County, MN x x x Mr. John Grindeland Highway Department
623 Freeborn County, MN x x x Mr. Dan Kenison Highway Department
401 Goodhue County, MN x x x Mr. Greg Isakson Highway Department
321 Grand Forks East Grand Forks MPO, ND x x x x x Ms. Teri Kouba Planning Department
561 Hennepin County, MN x x x Ms. Jamie Hendrickson Transportation Division
420 Kanabec County, MN x x x Mr. Greg Nikodym Public Works
399 McLeod County, MN x x x x x Mr. John Brunkhorst Highway Department
402 Mille Lacs County, MN x x x Mr. Bruce Cochran Highway Department
1200 Monterrey County, CA x x x x x Mr. Javad Tanbakuchi AAE Project Manager
2226 Montgomery County, TX x x x Ms. Rhonda Hovater Communication Information Services
381 Olmsted County, MN x x x Mr. Zach Demmer Department of Public Works
1058 Ottertail County, MN x x x Mr. Chuck Grotte Highway Department
1469 City of Tulsa, OK Residential Network x x x Mr. Jim Hemphill Poe & Associates, Inc.
531 City of Tulsa, OK Arterial Network x x x Mr. Jim Hemphill Poe & Associates, Inc.
967 Polk County, MN x x x Mr. Rich Sanders Highway Department
450 Rice County, MN x x x Mr. Jim Kollar Highway Department
2650 San Bernardino County, CA x x x Mr. Medhat Matta Pavement Mgmt. Department
340 Scott County, MN x x x Ms. Jeannie Briol Highway Department
3004 St. Louis County, MN x x x Mr. Brian Boder Highway Department
274 Wadena County, MN x x x Mr. Jeff Adolphson Highway Department
281 Washington County, MN x x x x x Mr. Don Theisen Transportation Department
380 Winona County, MN x x x Mr. Dave Kramer Highway Department
Appendix A. GoodPointe Technology Experience June 7, 2021
GoodPointe Technology, Inc. info@goodpointe.com
516 Wright County, MN x x x Mr. Kevin Johnson Highway Department
36,068 Total in last 5 Years
Past Infrastructure Management Projects Done by GoodPointe Staff
x Arlington County, VA x City of Norfolk, NE x Grand Forks-East Grand Forks MPO x Beltrami County, MN x City of Newark, NJ o City of Grand Forks, ND
x Cook County, MN x City of New Ulm, MN o City of East Grand Forks, MN
x CAI Recon Optical, Barrington IL x City of Oakdale, MN
x Carlton County, MN x City of Ottumwa, IA x Hidalgo County MPO
x Chisago County, MN x City of Plymouth, MN o City of Alamo, TX x City of Apple Valley, MN x City of Richfield, MN o City of Edinburg, TX
x City of Arden Hills, MN x City of Robbinsdale, MN o City of McAllen, TX
x City of Bloomington, MN x City of Rochester, MN o City of Mercedes, TX
x City of Brooklyn Center, MN x City of Rosemount, MN o City of Pharr, TX
x City of Brooklyn Park, MN x City of Roseville, MN o City of San Juan, TX
x City of Burnsville, MN x City of San Antonio, TX o City of Weslaco, TX
x City of Cedar Falls, IA x City of San Francisco, CA x Hunter Army Air Field x City of Champlin, MN x City of Sausalito, CA x Kanabec County, MN
x City of Chanhassen, MN x City of Shawnee, OK x Marine Corps Recruit Depot, SC
x City of Coon Rapids, MN x City of Shijiazhuang, PRC x McClellan Air Force Base, CA
x City of Cottage Grove, MN x City of Sioux Falls, SD x McLeod County, MN
x City of Denver, CO x City of Shoreview, MN x Metropolitan Airports Commission (MAC)
x City of Donna, TX x City of South Pasadena, CA x Mille Lacs County, MN
x City of Dothan, AL x City of St. Paul, MN x Minneapolis Park and Rec Board, MN x City of Duluth, MN x City of Tallahassee, FL x Monterrey County, CA
x City of Eagan, MN x City of Tulsa, OK x Montgomery County, TX
x City of Eden Prairie, MN x City of West Des Moines, IA x NHAI Natl. Highways Authority of India
x City of Edina, MN x City of West St. Paul, MN x Naval Air Station, Cecil Field, FL
x City of Elk Grove, IL x City of Woodbury, MN x Naval Air Station, Ingelside, TX x City of Evanston, IL x Bombay Municipal Corporation (BMC) x Olmsted County, MN
x City of Farmington, MN x Clay County, MN x Ohio Dept. of Transportation (ODOT)
x City of Fairmont, MN x Coco Solo Hospital, Panama x Peterson Air Force Base, CO
x City of Fargo, ND x Columbus Consolidated Gov., GA x Polk County, MN
x City of Fort Wayne, IN x Crow Wing County, MN x San Bernardino County, CA
x City of Grand Rapids, MN x Dakota County, MN x Scott County, MN
x City of Guangzhou, PRC x Dodge County, MN x Sherburne County, MN x City of Hopkins, MN x Douglas County, NE x Stanford University, CA
x City of Hutchinson, MN x El Paso County, Texas x Steele County, MN
x City of International Falls, MN x Fairfax County, VA x St. Cloud APO
x City of Inver Grove Heights, MN x Fillmore County, MN x St. Louis County, MN
x City of Lake Elmo, MN x Fort Buchanan, San Juan, Puerto Rico x Tulsa District Corps of Eng., OK
x City of Lakeville, MN x Fort Clayton, Republic of Panama x University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN
x City of Mankato, MN x Fort Devens, Ayer, MA x Virginia Dept. of Transp. (VDOT) x City of Maplewood, MN x Fort Drum, Watertown, NY x USMCA, Baumholder, Germany
x City of Medicine Lake, MN x Fort Gillem, Georgia x USMCA, Fulda, Germany
x City of Mendota Heights, MN x Fort McCoy, Sparta, WI x USMCA, Goppingen, Germany
x City of Menlo Park, CA x Fort McPherson, GA x USMCA, Hanau, Germany
x City of Miami/Dade County, FL x Fort Meade. Baltimore MD x Ventura County, CA x City of Minneapolis x Fort Sam Houston, San Antonio, TX x Village of Highland Park, IL
x City of Monticello, MN x Fort Stewart, GA x Village of Inverness, IL
x City of Moorhead, MN x Fort Story, Virginia Beach, VA x Village of St. Anthony, MN
x City of Mounds View, MN x Freeborn County, MN x Wadena County, MN
x City of Mumbai, India x Goodhue County, MN x Washington County, MN
x City of New Hope, MN x Winona County, MN