The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-21-23 Full PCMP1 NOTICE OF MEETING City of Lake Elmo Parks Commission 3880 Laverne Avenue North August 21st 2023 6:30 p.m. AGENDA 1. Call to Order 2. Pledge of Allegiance 3. Approve Agenda 4. Approve Minutes a) June 21st 2023 5. Public Comment 6. Invasive Species Management 7. Neighborhood Trail Connections 8. Communication 9. Adjourn ***Note: Every effort will be made to accommodate person or persons that need special considerations to attend this meeting due to a health condition or disability. Please contact the Lake Elmo City Clerk if you are in need of special accommodations. Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services in a Fiscally Responsible Manner in Partnership with our Community. City of Lake Elmo Parks Commission Minutes June 21, 2023 Members Present: Commissioners Kastler, Rivera-Reyes, Hoelscher, Elam, and Esch Absent: Commissioners Barrett and Bloyer Staff Present: Assistant Public Works Director Swanepoel The meeting was called to order by Kastler at 6:30 PM. Approval of Agenda Esch motioned to approve the agenda as presented, Hoelscher provided a second; no discussion. Unanimously approved 5-0. Approval of Minutes Rivera-Reyes motioned to approve the May 15, 2023 Parks Commission Minutes, Kastler provided a second; no comments. Motion passed unanimously 5-0. Public Comments Susan Dunn at 11018 Upper 33rd St N, a previous parks commission member, commented about positive activity at Lions Park and addressed some safety concerns. Sunfish Buckthorn update Assistant Public Works Director Swanepoel introduced George Johnson, 3070 Lake Elmo Ave., who presented a portion of the buckthorn update. Mr. Johnson commented on all of the work involved with buckthorn removal, granting, and the vision for the park. Larissa Mottl M.S., ecologist with Stantec, presented next in relation to the goal for natural resources in the park. The commission had follow up questions. Public comments were provided by Tony Manzara, 5050 Kirkwood Ave. N, in regards to the restoration project. Kastler motioned to recommend that Council direct the continuance of removal of buckthorn and native species and nonnative species using the high intensity method, work with Stantec to identify appropriate native species identified in the Forest Management Plan as climate change resilient and spare those trees in areas of the park where feasible and appropriate, use medium intensity methods, adjust trail signs and/or layout in areas at trail intersections where there identified safety concerns, but do not keep invasive species as trail barriers, Hoelscher provided a second; discussion held. Motion passed unanimously 5-0. Communications a) 4th of July Parade b) Council tabled baseball to the workshop meeting. Kastler adjourned the meeting at 7:51 PM Respectfully Submitted Rebecca McGuire, Deputy Clerk STAFF REPORT DATE: 08/21/2023 Discussion TO: Parks Commission AGENDA ITEM: Invasive Species Management FROM: Adam Swanepoel, Assistant Public Works Director REVIEWED BY: Marty Powers, Public Works Director Kristina Handt City Administrator BACKGROUND: Part of the Parks Commission work plan is to manage invasive species and protect biodiversity within our city parks. Invasive species are an organism that causes ecological or economic harm to the environment where it is not native. The best way to control invasive plants is to eliminate their populations before the spread and multiply. One of the most common types of invasive species within the city is buckthorn; however, Canada thistle, wild parsnip, poison ivy, musk thistle and emerald ash bore are also several other invasive species seen throughout the city. One could find these within the community in city parks, ditches, agriculture fields and storm water retention areas. Currently the city has no policy in controlling or removing any invasive species. The city is working the Friends of Sunfish Lake Park to help manage invasive species in Sunfish Lake Park. The Friends group along with Stantec have received a grant to remove buckthorn and other invasive species from the park. Other parks within the city are managed by city staff and the public works department. Each year the public works department mows undeveloped parks and ditches to reduce the spread of invasive species. Storm water retention ponds are mowed approximately every four years. ISSUE BEFORE THE COMMISSION: How would the parks commission like to see invasive species managed within our parks system? PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Currently the city does not have a policy for managing invasive species throughout its park system. Due to the current work load and staff numbers, the city would struggle to manage the spread of certain types of invasive species within our community. For example: Emerald Ash Borer was discovered in Minnesota in 2009, it has now been identified in over 40 different counties throughout the state. Once infected, trees quickly die and are often cut down and disposed of. Ash trees can be treated with an insecticide to prevent emerald ash borer infestation. To be effective, treatment needs to occur prior to infestation and must be repeated every two to three years for the entire life of the tree. It is less effective on trees over 50 inches in diameter. Buckthorn can be identified in many of the cities dense forest areas including, Pebble Park, Reid Park, Ridge Park, Demontreville Park and Sunfish Lake. Removal of buckthorn is done by cutting or pulling of the tree or plant and treating the remaining stump. Since seeds from these plants can remain viable up to five years, these areas should be monitored for new emerging plants during this time. These sites would benefit from replanting of new species of trees to aide in preventing the return of any species of buckthorn. FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of managing certain invasive species within our community would be unattainable with the current parks budget. The overall cost to manage either of these is unknown at this time. ATTACHMENTS: • MN DNR Noxious Weed List 1 Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants by Scientific Name (Compiled by the Minnesota DNR’s Invasive Species Program 02-06-2023) Key: • FN – Federal noxious weed (USDA–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) – all aquatic plants listed as federal noxious weeds (except Ipomoea aquatica) are also listed as prohibited invasive species by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • SN – State noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • RN – Restricted noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • PI – Prohibited invasive species (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) • PS – State prohibited weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • RS – State restricted weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • (See explanations of these classifications below the lists of species) Table 1. Aquatic plants in alphabetical order by scientific name. Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Azolla pinnata R. Brown mosquito fern, water velvet FN Butomus umbellatus L. flowering rush PI Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh Mediterranean strain (killer algae) FN Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne Australian stonecrop PI Eichomia azurea (Swartz) Kunth anchored water hyacinth, rooted water hyacinth FN Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle hydrilla FN, PI Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L. European frog-bit PI Hygrophila polysperma (Roxburgh) T. Anders Indian swampweed, Miramar weed FN, PI Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal water-spinach, swamp morning-glory FN Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss ex Wagner African oxygen weed FN, PI Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl) Blume ambulia FN Lythrum salicaria L., Lythrum virgatum L., (or any variety, hybrid or cultivar thereof) purple loosestrife PI, SN Melaleuca quenquinervia (Cav.) Blake broadleaf paper bank tree FN Monochoria hastata (L.) Solms-Laubach arrowleaf false pickerelweed FN Monochoria vaginalis (Burman f.) C. Presl heart-shaped false pickerelweed FN Myriophyllum spicatum L. Eurasian watermifoil PI Najas minor All. brittle naiad PI Nitellopsis obtusa L. starry stonewort PI Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. Ducklettuce FN Potamogeton crispus L. curly-leaf pondweed PI Sagittaria sagittifolia L. arrowhead FN Salvinia auriculata Aublet giant salvinia FN Salvinia biloba Raddi giant salvinia FN Salvinia herzogii de la Sota giant salvinia FN Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell aquarium watermoss, giant salvinia FN, PI Solanum tampicense Dunal wetland nightshade FN Sparganium erectum L. exotic bur-reed FN Stratiotes aloides L. water aloe or water soldiers PI Trapa natans L. water chestnut PI 2 Table 2. Parasitic weeds in alphabetical order by scientific name. Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Aeginetia spp. FN Alectra spp. FN Cuscuta spp. (dodders), other than following species: Dodder FN Cuscuta americana L. Cuscuta applanata Engelmann Cuscuta approximata Babington Cuscuta attenuata Waterfall Cuscuta boldinghii Urban Cuscuta brachycalyx (Yuncker) Yuncker Cuscuta californica Hooker & Arnott Cuscuta campestris Yuncker Cuscuta cassytoides Nees ex Engelmann Cuscuta ceanothii Behr Cuscuta cephalanthii Engelmann Cuscuta compacta Jussieu Cuscuta corylii Engelmann Cuscuta cuspidata Engelmann Cuscuta decipiens Yuncker Cuscuta dentatasquamata Yuncker Cuscuta denticulata Engelmann Cuscuta epilinum Weihe Cuscuta epithymum (L.) L. Cuscuta erosa Yuncker Cuscuta europaea L. Cuscuta exaltata Engelmann Cuscuta fasciculata Yuncker Cuscuta glabrior (Engelmann) Yuncker Cuscuta globulosa Bentham Cuscuta glomerata Choisy Cuscuta gronovil Willdenow Cuscuta harperi Small Cuscuta howelliana Rubtzoff Cuscuta indecora Choisy Cuscuta leptantha Engelmann Cuscuta mitriiformis Engelmann Cuscuta obtusiflora Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth Cuscuta odontolepis Engelmann Cuscuta pentagona Engelmann Cuscuta planiflora Tenore Cuscuta plattensis A. Nelson Cuscuta polygonorum Engelmann Cuscuta rostrata Shuttleworth ex Engelmann Cuscuta runyonii Yuncker Cuscuta salina Engelmann Cuscuta sandwichiana Choisy 3 Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Cuscuta squamata Engelmann Cuscuta suaveolens Seringe Cuscuta suksdorfii Yuncker Cuscuta tuberculata Brandegee Cuscuta umbellata Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth Cuscuta umbrosa Beyrich ex Hooker Cuscuta veatchii Brandegee Cuscuta warneri Yuncker Orobanche spp. (broomrapes), other than the following species: Broomrapes FN Orobanche californica Schlechtendal & Chamisso Orobanche cooperi (Gray) Heller Orobanche corymbosa (Rydberg) Ferris Orobanche dugesii (S. Watson) Munz Orobanche fasciculata Nuttail Orobanche ludoviciana Nuttail Orobanche multicaulis Brandegee Orobanche parishii (Jepson) Heckard Orobanche pinorum Geyer ex Hooker Orobanche uniflora L. Orobanche valida Jepson Orobanche vallicola (Jepson) Heckard Striga spp. witchweeds FN Table 3. Terrestrial weeds in alphabetical order by scientific name. Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Acacia nilotica (L.) Wildenow ex Delile gum Arabic tree, thorny acacia FN Acer platanoides L. Norway maple SN – specially regulated Acer tataricum L. Tatarian maple SN – specially regulated Ageratina adenophora (Sprengel) King &Robinson crofton weed FN Ageratina riparia (Regel) R.M. King and H. Robinson creeping croftonweed FN Agropyron repens L. quackgrass RS Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle tree of heaven SN Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande garlic mustard RN Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. European alder RN Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Brown ex de Candolle sessile joyweed FN Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson Palmer amaranth SN, PS Ampelopsis brevipedunculata (Maxim.) Trautv. porcelain berry RN Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns cape weed FN Asphodelus fistulosus L. onionweed FN Avena sterilis L., (including Avena ludoviciana Durieu) animated oat, wild oat FN Berberis thunbergii DC, specific cultivars listed on MDA noxious weed list Japanese barberry, specific cultivars RN Berberis vulgaris L. common barberry SN Berteroa incana D.C. hoary alyssum RS 4 Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Brassica arvensis L. wild mustard RS Cannabis sativa L. hemp PS Caragana arborescens Lam. (exemption for Green Spires® Caragana - Caragana 'Jefarb') Siberian peashrub RN Cardamine impatiens L. narrowleaf bittercress SN Carduus acanthoides plumeless thistle SN, PS Carduus nutans musk thistle PS Carthamus oxyacantha M. Bieberstein wild safflower FN Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. round leaf bittersweet SN Centaurea diffusa Lam. diffuse knapweed SN Centaurea jacea L. brown knapweed SN Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek spotted knapweed SN Centaurea repens L. Russian knapweed PS Centaurea solstitialis L. yellow starthistle SN Centaurea x moncktonii C.E. Britton meadow knapweed SN Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop Canada thistle SN, PS Cirsium vulgare (Savi) Ten. bull thistle PS Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retzius) Trinius pillpiliula FN Commelina benghalensis L. Benghal dayflower FN Conium maculatum L. poison hemlock SN Convolvulus arvensis L. field bindweed PS Crupina vulgaris Cassini common crupina FN Cuscuta spp. dodder RS Cynanchum louiseae Kartesz & Gandhi black swallow-wort SN Cynanchum rossicum Kleopow pale swallow-wort SN Daucus carota L. Queen Anne’s Lace RN Digitalis lanata Ehrh. Grecian foxglove SN Digitaria velutina (Forsskal) Palisot de Beauvois velvet fingergrass, annual conchgrass FN Dipsacus fullonum (L.) common teasel SN Dipsacus laciniatus L. cut-leaved teasel SN Drymaria arenarioides Humboldt & Bonpland ex Roemer & Schultes lightning weed FN Emex australis Steinhell three-cornered jack FN Emex spinosa (L.) Campdera devil’s thorn FN Euonymus alatus Thunb. winged burning bush SN – specially regulated Euphorbia esula L. leafy spurge SN, PS Euphorbia terracina L. false caper FN Ficaria verna L. lesser celandine RN Fragula alnus Mill. (columnaris, tallcole, asplenifolia and all other cultivars) glossy buckthorn, including all cultivars RN Galega officinalis L. goatsrue FN Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier giant hogweed FN, SN Humulus japonicus Siebold & Zucc. Japanese hops SN Imperata brasiliensis Trinius Brazilian satintail FN Inperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel cogongrass FN Inula britannica L. British elecampane, British yellowhead FN Ischaemum rugosum Salisbury murainograss FN Lepidium draba L. perennial peppergrass PS Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees Asian sprangletop FN Lonicera japonica Thunb. Japanese honeysuckle SN Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. Dalmatian toadflax SN Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder Amur honeysuckle RN Lonicera morrowii (A. Gray) Morrow’s honeysuckle RN 5 Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Lonicera tartarica L. Tatarian honeysuckle RN Lonicera x. bella Zabel Bell’s honeysuckle RN Lycium ferocissimum Miers African boxthorn FN Lygodium flexuosum (L.) Sw. maidenhair creeper FN Lygodium microphyllum (Cav.) R. Br. old world climbing fern FN Lythrum salicaria, virgatum, or any combination purple loosestrife SN Melastoma malabathricum L. Malabar melostome FN Mikania cordata (Burman f.) B. L. Robinson mile-a-minute FN Mikania micrantha Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth bittervine FN Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright giant sensitive plant FN Mimosa pigra L. var. pigra catclaw mimosa FN Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Franch. Amur silvergrass RN Moraea collina Thunberg apricot Cape-tulip FN Moraea faccida (Sweet) Steudel one-leaf Cape-tulip FN Moraea miniata Andrews two-leaf Cape-tulip FN Moraea ochroleuca (Salisbury) Drapiez red Cape-tulip FN Moraea pallida (Baker) Goldblatt yellow Cape-tulip FN Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Hackel ex Arechavaleta serrated tussock FN Onopordum acaulon L. stemless thistle FN Onopordum illyricum L. Illyrian thistle FN Opuntia aurantiaca Lindley jointed prickly pear FN Oryza longistaminata A. Chevalier & Roehrich red rice FN Oryza punctata Kotschy ex Steudel red rice FN Oryza rufipogon Griffith red rice FN Paspalum scrobiculatum L. Kodo-millet FN Pastinaca sativa L. wild parsnip SN Pennisetum clandestinum Hochstetter ex Chiovenda kikuyugrass FN Pennisetum macrourum Trinius African feathergrass FN Pennisetum pedicellatum Trinius kyasumagrass FN Pennisetum polystachion (L.) Schultes missiongrass, thin napiergrass FN Phellodendron amurense Rupr. Amur corktree SN – specially regulated Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud subsp. australis common reed – non-native subspecies RN Plantago lanceolata L. buckhorn plantain RS Polygonum x bohemicum (J. Chrtek & Chrtkova) Zika & Jacobson Bohemian knotweed SN Polygonum cuspidatum Seib. & Zucc. Japanese knotweed SN Polygonum sachalinense F. Schmidt ex Maxim giant knotweed SN Prosopis alpataco R. A. Phillippi FN Prosopis argentina Burkart FN Prosopis articulata S. Watson FN Prosopis burkartii Munoz FN Prosopis caldenia Burkart FN Prosopis calingastana Burkart FN Prosopis campestris Griseback FN Prosopis castellanosii Burkart FN Prosopis denudans Bentham FN Prosopis elata (Burkart) Burkart FN Prosopis farcta (Solander ex Russell) Macbride Syrian mesquite FN Prosopis ferox Griesebach FN Prosopis fiebrigii Harms FN Prosopis hassleri Harms FN 6 Scientific Name Common Name Regulatory Classification Prosopis humillis Gilles ex Hooker & Arnott FN Prosopis kuntzei Harms FN Prosopis pallida (Humb. & Bonpl. Ex Willd.) Kunth FN Prosopis palmeri S. Watson FN Prosopis reptans Bentham var. reptans FN Prosopis rojasiana Burkart FN Prosopis ruizlealii Burkart FN Prosopis ruscifolia Grisebach FN Prosopis sericantha Gillies ex Hooker & Arnott FN Prosopis strombulifera (Lamarck) Bentham FN Prosopis torquata (Cavanilles ex Lagasca y Segura) de Candolle FN Pyrus calleryana Decne. Callery pear SN – specially regulated Raphanus raphanistrum L. wild radish RS Rhamnus cathartica L. common or European buckthorn RN Robinia pseudoacacia L. black locust RN Rosa multiflora Thunb. multiflora rose RN Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W. Clayton itchgrass FN Rubus fruticosus L. (complex) wild blackberry FN Rubus moluccanus L. wild raspberry FN Saccharum spontaneum L. wild sugarcane FN Salsola vermiculata L. wormleaf salsola FN Securigera varia (L.) Lassen crown vetch RN Senecio inaequidens DC South African ragwort FN Senecio madagascariensis Poir Madagascar ragwort FN Setaria faberii Herrm. giant foxtail RS Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. subsp. pallidefusca (Schumach.) B.K. Simon cattail grass FN Solanum carolinense L. horse nettle RS Solanum ptycanthum Dun Eastern black nightshade RS Solanum torvum Swartz turkeyberry FN Solanum viarum Dunal tropical soda apple FN Sonchus arvensis L. perennial sowthistle PS Sorghum halepense L. Johnsongrass SN Spermacoce alata Aublet winged false buttonweed FN Tamarix ramoissima Ledeb. saltcedar RN Tanacetum vulgare L. tansy SN Thladiantha dubia Bunge red hailstone SN Thlaspi arvense L. Frenchweed RS Toxicodendron radicans* (L.) Kuntze poison ivy (formerly Rhus radicans) SN – specially regulated Tridex procumbens L. coat buttons FN Urochloa panicoides Beauvois liverseed grass FN *Native species to Minnesota Definitions FEDERAL NOXIOUS WEED LIST (FN) Federal Noxious Weeds are listed in the Code of Federal Regulations, title 7, section 360.200. According to the Federal Noxious Weed Act, Title 7, Chapter 61, section 2803, federal noxious weeds may not be imported into or through the United States, unless in accordance with conditions allowed by the 7 sale, purchase, exchange, or receipt of federal noxious weeds is illegal. For more information contact: Erin Stiers, USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), at 952-814-1071 or Erin.N.Stiers@aphis.usda.gov. STATE PROHIBITED NOXIOUS WEEDS (SN) The Minnesota Noxious Weed Law (MN Statutes 18.75-18.91) defines a noxious weed as an annual, biennial, or perennial plant that the Commissioner of Agriculture designates to be injurious to public health, the environment, public roads, crops, livestock or other property. Prohibited noxious weeds must be controlled or eradicated as required in Minnesota Statutes, section 18.78. See Noxious Weed List website for description of categories including prohibited eradicate noxious weed, prohibited control noxious weed, and specially regulated plant. For more information contact: Anthony Cortilet, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651- 201-6538 or Anthony.Cortilet@state.mn.us. **Note that Minnesota counties may also list species as noxious weeds within their county. See MDA county noxious weed website for most current lists. RESTRICTED NOXIOUS WEEDS (RN) Species are designated restricted noxious weeds to prevent their spread by prohibiting the importation, sale, and transportation of their propagating parts in the state except as allowed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.82. For more information contact: Anthony Cortilet, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6538 or Anthony.Cortilet@state.mn.us. PROHIBITED INVASIVE SPECIES (PI) These species and any hybrids, cultivars, or varieties of the species are designated by the Department of Natural Resources in M.R. 6216.0250 as prohibited invasive species. It is illegal to possess, import, purchase, sell, propagate, transport, or introduce prohibited invasive species, except as allowed by statute. The statutes and rules that apply to these species are M.S. 84D05, 84D.08, 84D.10, 84D.11, 84D.13, M.R. 6216.0265, and M.R. 6216.0280. For more information contact: Kelly Pennington, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources at 651-259-5131 or Kelly.Pennington@state.mn.us, or visit the DNR invasive species laws website. PROHIBITED WEED SEEDS (PS) Prohibited weed seeds are prohibited from being present in agricultural, vegetable, flower, tree, and shrub seeds sold in Minnesota in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 21.86, subdivision 1, paragraph (d). The plants listed in M.R. 1510.0271 are prohibited weed seeds. For more information contact: Denise Thiede, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6531or Denise.Thiede@state.mn.us. RESTRICTED WEED SEEDS (RS) Minnesota’s restricted weed seeds are those weed seeds which, if present in agricultural, vegetable, flower, tree, and shrub seed, must be named on the label together with the number per ounce or pound of seed specified and which may not exceed the legal limit. They are seeds of weeds which are objectionable in fields, lawns, and gardens of this state and which can be controlled by good cultural practice and use of herbicides. Restricted weed seeds are listed in M.R. 1510.0320. For more information contact: Denise Thiede, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6531 or Denise.Thiede@state.mn.us. 8 Minnesota and Federal Prohibited and Noxious Plants by Common Name (Compiled by the Minnesota DNR’s Invasive Species Program 10-12-2020) Key: • FN – Federal noxious weed (USDA–Animal Plant Health Inspection Service) – all aquatic plants listed as federal noxious weeds (except Ipomoea aquatica) are also listed as prohibited invasive species by the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources • SN – State noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • RN – Restricted noxious weed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • PI – Prohibited invasive species (Minnesota Department of Natural Resources) • PS – State prohibited weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • RS – State restricted weed seed (Minnesota Department of Agriculture) • (See explanations of these classifications below the lists of species) Table 4. Aquatic plants in alphabetical order by common name. Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification African oxygen weed Lagarosiphon major (Ridley) Moss ex Wagner FN, PI ambulia Limnophila sessiliflora (Vahl) Blume) FN anchored or rooted water hyacinth Eichornia azurea (Swartz) Kunth FN aquarium watermoss, giant salvinia Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell FN, PI arrowhead Sagittaria sagittifolia L. FN arrowleaf false pickerelweed Monochoria hastata (L.) Solms-Laubach FN Australian stonecrop Crassula helmsii (Kirk) Cockayne PI brittle naiad Najas minor All. PI broadleaf paper bark tree Melaleuca quenquinervia (Cav.) Blake FN curly-leaf pondweed Potamogeton crispus L. PI ducklettuce Ottelia alismoides (L.) Pers. FN European frog-bit Hydrocharis morsus-ranae L. PI Eurasian watermilfoil Myriophyllum spicatum L. PI exotic bur-reed Sparganium erectum L. FN flowering rush Butomus umbellatus L. PI giant salvinia Salvinia auriculata Aublet FN giant salvinia Salvinia biloba Raddi FN giant salvinia Salvinia herzogii de la Sota FN heart-shaped false pickerelweed Monochoria vaginalis (Burman f.) C. Presl FN hydrilla Hydrilla verticillata (L. f.) Royle FN, PI Indian swampweed, Miramar weed Hygrophila polysperma (Roxburgh) T. Anders FN, PI Mediterranean strain (killer algae) Caulerpa taxifolia (Vahl) C. Agardh FN mosquito fern, water velvet Azolla pinnata R. Brown FN purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria, Lythrum virgatum, or any variety, hybrid, or cultivar thereof) L. PI, SN starry stonewort Nitellopsis obtusa L. PI water aloe or water soldiers Stratioles aloides L. PI water chestnut Trapa natans L. PI water-spinach, swamp morning-glory Ipomoea aquatica Forsskal FN wetland nightshade Solanum tampicense Dunal FN 9 Table 5. Parasitic weeds in alphabetical order by common name. Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification None Aeginetia spp. FN None Alectra spp. FN Broomrapes Orobanche spp. other than the following species: FN Orobanche bulbosa (Gray) G. Beck Orobanche californica Schechtendal & Chamisso Orobanche cooperi (Gray) Heller Orobanche corymbosa (Rydberg) Ferris Orobanche dugesii (S. Watson) Munz Orobanche fasciculata Nuttall Orobanche ludoviciana Nuttall Orobanche multicaulis Brandegee Orobanche parishii (Jepson) Heckard Orobanche pinorum Geyer ex Heckard Orobanche uniflora L. Orobanche valida Jepson Orobanche vallicola (Jepson) Heckard Dodders Cuscuta spp. (dodders), other than following species: FN Cuscuta americana L. Cuscuta applanata Engelmann Cuscuta approximata Babington Cuscuta attenuata Waterfall Cuscuta boldinghii Urban Cuscuta brachycalyx (Yuncker) Yuncker Cuscuta californica Hooker & Arnott Cuscuta campestris Yuncker Cuscuta cassytoides Nees ex Engelmann Cuscuta ceanothii Behr Cuscuta cephalanthii Engelmann Cuscuta compacta Jussieu Cuscuta corylii Engelmann Cuscuta cuspidata Engelmann Cuscuta decipiens Yuncker Cuscuta dentatasquamata Yuncker Cuscuta denticulata Engelmann Cuscuta epilinum Weihe Cuscuta epithymum (L.) L. Cuscuta erosa Yuncker Cuscuta europaea L. Cuscuta exaltata Engelmann Cuscuta fasciculata Yuncker Cuscuta glabrior (Engelmann) Yuncker Cuscuta globulosa Bentham Cuscuta glomerata Choisy Cuscuta gronovil Willdenow Cuscuta harperi Small Cuscuta howelliana Rubtzoff Cuscuta indecora Choisy Cuscuta leptantha Engelmann Cuscuta mitriiformis Engelmann Cuscuta obtusiflora Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth 10 Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification Cuscuta odontolepis Engelmann Cuscuta pentagona Engelmann Cuscuta planiflora Tenore Cuscuta plattensis A. Nelson Cuscuta polygonorum Engelmann Cuscuta rostrata Shuttleworth ex Engelmann Cuscuta runyonii Yuncker Cuscuta salina Engelmann Cuscuta sandwichiana Choisy Cuscuta squamata Engelmann Cuscuta suaveolens Seringe Cuscuta suksdorfii Yuncker Cuscuta tuberculata Brandegee Cuscuta umbellata Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth Cuscuta umbrosa Beyrich ex Hooker Cuscuta veatchii Brandegee Cuscuta warneri Yuncker Witchweeds Striga spp. FN Table 6. Terrestrial weeds in alphabetical order by common name. Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification Prosopis alpataco R. A. Phillippi FN Prosopis articulata S. Watson FN Prosopis burkartii Munoz FN Prosopis caldenia Burkart FN Prosopis calingastana Burkart FN Prosopis campestris Griseback FN Prosopis castellanosii Burkart FN Prosopis denudans Bentham FN Prosopis elata (Burkart) Burkart FN Prosopis ferox Grisebach FN Prosopis fiebrigii Harms FN Prosopis hassleri Harms FN Prosopis humillis Gillies ex Hooker & Arnott FN Prosopis kuntzei Harms FN Prosopis pallida (Humboldt & Bonpland ex Willdenow) Humboldt, Bonpland & Kunth FN Prosopis palmeri S. Watson FN Prosopis reptans Bentham var. reptans FN Prosopis rojasiana Burkart FN Prosopis ruizlealii Burkart FN Prosopis ruscifolia Grisebach FN Prosopis sericantha Gillies ex Hooker & Arnott FN Prosopis strombulifera (Lamarck) Bentham FN Prosopis torquata (Cavanilles ex Lagasca y Segura) de Candolle FN African feathergrass Pennisetum macrourum Trinius FN African boxthorn Lycium ferocissimum Miers FN Amur corktree Phellodendron amurense Rupr. SN – specially regulated Amur honeysuckle Lonicera maackii (Rupr.) Herder RN Amur silvergrass Miscanthus sacchariflorus (Maxim.) Franch. RN 11 Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification animated oat, wild oat Avena sterilis L. (including Avena ludoviciana Durieu) FN Asian sprangletop Leptochloa chinensis (L.) Nees FN Bell’s honeysuckle Lonicera x bella Zabel RN Benghal dayflower Commelina benghalensis L. FN bittervine Mikania micrantha Humboldt, Bonpland, & Kunth FN black locust Robinia pseudoacacia (L.) RN black swallow-wort Cynanchum louiseae Kartesz & Gandhi SN Bohemian knotweed Polygonum x bohemicum (J. Chrtek & Chrtkova) Zika & Jacobson SN Brazilian satintail Imperata brasiliensis Trinius FN British elecampane, British yellowhead Inula britannica L. FN brown knapweed Centaurea jacea L. SN buckhorn plantain Plantago lanceolata L. RS bull thistle Cirsium vulgare L. PS Callery pear Pyrus calleryana Decne. SN – specially regulated Canada thistle Cirsium arvense (L.) Scop. SN, PS Cape-tulip, apricot Moraea collina Thunberg FN Cape-tulip, one-leaf Moraea faccida (Sweet) Steudel FN Cape-tulip red Moraea ochroleuca (Salisbury) Drapiez FN Cape-tulip, two-leaf Moraea miniata Andrews FN Cape-tulip, yellow Moraea pallida (Baker) Goldblatt FN Cape weed Arctotheca calendula (L.) Levyns FN catclaw mimosa Mimosa pigra L. var. pigra FN cattail grass Setaria pumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. subsp. pallidefusca (Schumach.) B.K. Simon FN coat buttons Tridax procumbens L. FN cogongrass Imperata cylindrica (L.) Raeuschel FN common barberry Berberis vulgaris (L.) SN common crupina Crupina vulgarisi Cassini FN common or European buckthorn Rhamnus cathartica L. RN common reed – non-native subspecies Phragmites australis (Cav.) Trin. Ex Steud subsp. australis RN common teasel Dipsacus fullonum L. SN creeping crofton weed Ageratina riparia (Regel) R.M. King and H. Robinson FN crofton weed Ageratina adenophroa (Sprengel) King & Robinson FN crown vetch Securigera varia (L.) Lassen RN Cut-leaved teasel Dipsacus laciniatus L. SN Dalmatian toadflax Linaria dalmatica (L.) Mill. SN devil’s thorn Emex spinosa (L.) Campdera FN diffuse knapweed Centaurea diffusa (Lam.) SN dodder Cuscuta spp. RS Eastern black nightshade Solanum plycanthum Dun RS European alder Alnus glutinosa (L.) Gaertn. RN false caper Euphorbia terracina L. FN field bindweed Convolvulus arvensis L. PS Frenchweed Thlaspi arvense L. RS garlic mustard Alliaria petiolata (M. Bieb.) Cavara & Grande RN giant foxtail Setaria faberii Herrm. RS giant hogweed Heracleum mantegazzianum Sommier & Levier FN, SN giant knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Seib. & Zucc. SN – specially regulated giant sensitive plant Mimosa diplotricha C. Wright FN glossy buckthorn, including all cultivars Frangula alnus Mill. columnaris, tallcole, asplenifolia RN 12 Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification and all cultivars goatsrue Galega officinialis L. FN Grecian foxglove Digitalis lanata Ehrh. SP gum Arabic tree, thorny acacia Acacia nilotica (L.) Wildenow ex Delile FN hemp Cannabis sativa L. PS hoary alyssum Berteroa incana D.C. RS horse nettle Solanum carolinense L. RS Illyrian thistle Onopordum illyricum L. FN itchgrass Rottboellia cochinchinensis (Lour.) W. Clayton FN Japanese barberry Berberis thunbergi DC RN Japanese honeysuckle Lonicera japonica Thunb. SN Japanese hops Humulus japnicus Siebold & Zucc. SN Japanese knotweed Polygonum cuspidatum Seib. & Zucc. SN – specially regulated Johnsongrass Sorghum halepense L. SN jointed prickly pear Opuntia aurantiaca Lindley FN kikuyugrass Pennisetum clandestinum Hochsletter ex Chiovenda FN kodo-millet Paspalum scrobiculatum L. FN kyasumagrass Pennisetum pedicellatum Trinius FN leafy spurge Euphorbia esula L. SN, PS lesser celandine Ficaria verna L. RN lightning weed Drymaria arenariodes Humboldt & Bonpland Ex Roerner & Schultes FN liverseed grass Urochloa panicoides L. FN Madagascar ragwort Senecio madagascariensis Poir FN Malabar melostome Melastoma malabathricum L. FN maidenhair creeper Lygodium flexuosum (L.) Sw. FN meadow knapweed Centaurea x moncktonii C.E. Britton SN mile-a-minute Mikania cordata (Burman f.) B. L. Robinson FN missiongrass, thin napiergrass Pennisetum polystachion (L.) Schultes FN Morrow’s honeysuckle Lonicera morrowii A. Gray RN multiflora rose Rosa multiflora Thunb. RN murainograss Ischaemum rugosum Salisbury FN musk thistle Carduus nutans L. PS narrowleaf bittercress Cardamine impatiens L. SN Norway maple Acer platanoides L. SN – specially regulated old world climbing fern Lygodium microphyllum (Cav.) R. Br. FN onionweed Asphodelus fistulosus L. FN pale swallow-wort Cynanchum rossicum Kleopow SN Palmer amaranth Amaranthus palmeri S. Watson SN, PS perennial sowthistle Sonchus arvensis L. PS perennial peppergrass Lepidium draba L. PS pilipiliula Chrysopogon aciculatus (Retzius) Trinius FN plumeless thistle Carduus acanthoides L. SN, PS poison hemlock Conium maculatum L. SN poison ivy* Toxicodendron radicans* (L.) Kuntze (formerly Rhus radicans) SN – specially regulated porcelain berry Ampelopsis brevipendunculata (Maxim.) Trautv. RN purple loosestrife Lythrum salicaria, virgatum, or any combination SN quackgrass Agropyron repens L. RS Queen Anne’s lace Daucus carota L. RN red hailstone Thladiantha dubia Bunge SN red rice Oryza punctata Kotschy ex Steudel FN 13 Common Name Scientific Name Regulatory Classification red rice Oryza longistaminata A. Chevalier & Roehrich FN red rice Oryza rufipogon Griffith FN round leaf bittersweet Celastrus orbiculatus Thunb. SN Russian knapweed Centaurea repens L. PS saltcedar Tamarix ramoissima Ledeb. RN serrated tussock Nassella trichotoma (Nees) Hackel ex Arechavaleta FN sessile joyweed Alternanthera sessilis (L.) R. Brown ex de Candolle FN Siberian peashrub Caragana arborescens Lam. (exemption for Green Spires® Caragana - Caragana 'Jefarb') RN South African ragwort Senecio inaequidens DC FN spotted knapweed Centaurea stoebe L. ssp. micranthos (Gugler) Hayek SN stemless thistle Onopordum acaulon L. FN Syrian mesquite Prosopis farcta (Solander ex Russell) Macbride FN tansy Tanacetum vulgare L. SN Tatarian honeysuckle Lonicera tartarica L. RN Tatarian maple Acer tataricum L. SN – specially regulated three-cornered jack Emex australis Steinhell FN tree of heaven Ailanthus altissima (Mill.) Swingle SN tropical soda apple Solarum viarum Dunal FN turkeyberry Solanum torvum Swartz FN velvet fingergrass, annual conchgrass Digitaria velutina (Forsskal) Palisot de Beauvois FN wild blackberry Rubus fruticosus L. (complex) FN wild mustard Brassica kaber L. RS wild parsnip Pastinaca sativa L. SN wild radish Raphanus raphanistrum L. RS wild raspberry Rubus moluccanus L. FN wild safflower Carthamus oxyacantha M. Bieberstein FN wild sugarcane Saccharum spontaneum L. FN winged burning bush Euonymus alatus Thunb. SN – specially regulated winged false buttonweed Spermacoce alata Aublet FN wormleaf salsola Salsola vermiculata L. FN yellow starthistle Centaurea solstitialis L. SN *Native species to Minnesota Definitions FEDERAL NOXIOUS WEED LIST (FN) Federal Noxious Weeds are listed in the Code of Federal Regulations, title 7, section 360.200. According to the Federal Noxious Weed Act, Title 7, Chapter 61, section 2803, federal noxious weeds may not be imported into or through the United States, unless in accordance with conditions allowed by the USDA-APHIS. The sale, purchase, exchange, or receipt of federal noxious weeds is illegal. For more information contact: Erin Stiers, USDA, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), at 952-814-1071 or Erin.N.Stiers@aphis.usda.gov. STATE PROHIBITED NOXIOUS WEEDS (SN) The Minnesota Noxious Weed Law (MN Statutes 18.75-18.91) defines a noxious weed as an annual, biennial, or perennial plant that the Commissioner of Agriculture designates to be injurious to public health, the environment, public roads, crops, livestock or other property. Prohibited noxious weeds must be controlled or eradicated as required in Minnesota Statutes, section 18.78. See Noxious Weed List website for description of categories including prohibited eradicate noxious weed, prohibited control noxious weed, and specially 14 regulated plant. For more information contact: Anthony Cortilet, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6538 or Anthony.Cortilet@state.mn.us, **Note that Minnesota counties may also list species as noxious weeds within their county. See MDA county noxious weed website for most current lists. RESTRICTED NOXIOUS WEEDS (RN) Species are designated restricted noxious weeds to prevent their spread by prohibiting the importation, sale, and transportation of their propagating parts in the state except as allowed by Minnesota Statutes, Section 18.82. For more information contact: Anthony Cortilet, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6538 or Anthony.Cortilet@state.mn.us. PROHIBITED INVASIVE SPECIES (PI) These species and any hybrids, cultivars, or varieties of the species are designated by the Department of Natural Resources in M.R. 6216.0250 as prohibited invasive species. It is illegal to possess, import, purchase, sell, propagate, transport, or introduce prohibited invasive species, except as allowed by statute. The statutes and rules that apply to these species are M.S. 84D05, 84D.08, 84D.10, 84D.11, 84D.13, M.R. 6216.0265, and M.R. 6216.0280. For more information contact: Kelly Pennington, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources at 651-259-5131 or Kelly.Pennington@state.mn.us, or visit the DNR invasive species laws website. PROHIBITED WEED SEEDS (PS) Prohibited weed seeds are prohibited from being present in agricultural, vegetable, flower, tree, and shrub seeds sold in Minnesota in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, section 21.86, subdivision 1, paragraph (d). The plants listed in M.R. 1510.0271 are prohibited weed seeds. For more information contact: Denise Thiede, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6531or Denise.Thiede@state.mn.us. RESTRICTED WEED SEEDS (RS) Minnesota’s restricted weed seeds are those weed seeds which, if present in agricultural, vegetable, flower, tree, and shrub seed, must be named on the label together with the number per ounce or pound of seed specified and which may not exceed the legal limit. They are seeds of weeds which are objectionable in fields, lawns, and gardens of this state and which can be controlled by good cultural practice and use of herbicides. Restricted weed seeds are listed in M.R. 1510.0320. For more information contact: Denise Thiede, Minnesota Department of Agriculture, at 651-201-6531 or Denise.Thiede@state.mn.us. STAFF REPORT DATE: 08/21/2023 DISCUSSION TO: Parks Commission AGENDA ITEM: Neighborhood Trail Connections FROM: Adam Swanepoel, Assistant Public Works Director SUBMITTED BY: Marty Powers, Public Works Director Kristina Handt, City Administrator BACKGROUND: Staff has continued to search for potential trail connections between residential communities in the city. The purpose is to improve the cities trail system as well as getting trail users to get from one part of the city to the next. This year two new trail segment are being built; the first between Tapestry and Hamlet on Sunfish Lake communities and the second between Stonegate and Inwood communities. Washington County is still considering a Central Greenway Regional Trail that will connect the Lake Elmo Park Reserve to downtown Lake Elmo and extend to HWY 36 along HWY 15. Although this trail was not included in Washington County’s most recent CIP there is still potential this would be considered in 2028-29 if road improvements in those areas occur. ISSUE BEFORE THE COMMISSION: Are there any additional trail connections the city should consider in the next ten years? PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS: Staff has reviewed several areas for potential trail improvements within the city. 1. 43rd St. N to Lake Elmo Ave. An additional trail connection between Sunfish Ponds and Lake Elmo Ave. would allow for users from the Tapestry and Hamlet communities to gain access to the Lake Elmo Ave. trail as well as connections with the Wildflower and Village Preserve areas. 2. Keats Ave. N Adding a trail connection from Tapestry to 59th St. N. This 1.5 mile trail would allow users from the areas of Hidden Meadows, Prairie Hamlet, Rolling Hills Est., Lake Elmo Hills, Arabian Hills, and Meyers Pineridge all a trial access along Keats Ave. FISCAL IMPACT: The current cost of these projects are TBD. At this point these areas are only being considered. ATTACHMENT: • Central Greenway Master Plan • Keats Ave. Map • 43rd St. Map CENTRAL GREENWAY REGIONAL TRAIL MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT LAKE ELMO SEGMENT: I-94 TO MN 36 June 2019 Page Intentionally Blank II Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 PREPARED BY: PREPARED FOR: ADOPTED BY THE METROPOLITAN COUNCIL ON JUNE 12, 2019 CENTRAL GREENWAY REGIONAL TRAIL LAKE ELMO SEGMENT: INTERSTATE 94 TO MINNESOTA HIGHWAY 36 MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT IIICentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 IV Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank VCentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . IX Trail Location IX Natural Resource Description IX Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Metro Regional Park System 1 Washington County Parks Overview 2 Relationship to Other Plans 2 Involved Public Agencies 2 Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 Location and Contextual Relationship 5 Natural Resources 6 Acquisition Status 8 Boundaries & Acquisition Costs 8 Section II: Demand Forecast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Demographic Overview 13 Statewide and Regional Trends 13 Methodology 13 Aging Population 15 Minority Populations 15 Other Trends Affecting Recreation 15 Active Living By Design – A Complementary Vision 16 Physical Activity/Preventing Obesity 16 Connectivity and Accessibility 17 Mental Health 17 Statewide Health Improvement Program (SHIP) 17 Existing Washington County Use Data 17 Section III: Development Concept . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Development Plan 18 Primary Trail Design Elements 20 Supporting Trail Elements 20 Route Assessment 23 VI Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Implementation 35 Estimated Costs 35 Section IV: Conflicts and Coordination with Adjacent Public Services . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .37 Section V: Operations and Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 Proposed Maintenance Activities 39 Public Safety 40 Sources of Revenue 40 Ordinances 40 Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .41 Overview 41 Regional Trail Planning 41 Central Greenway Regional Trail Technical Advisory Committee 41 Washington County Park Commission 42 One-on-one Listening Sessions 42 Public Open Houses 43 Pop-up Meetings 44 Summary of Public Engagement Comments 45 Section VII: Public Awareness . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 Section VIII: Accessibility . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Affordability 53 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 55 Appendix A: Resolutions of Support . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 Appendix B: Trail Plans . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .61 Appendix C: Detailed Cost Estimate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Estimate Notes 73 Appendix D: Rare Species List . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75 Species: 75 Appendix E: WikiMap Results . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 Appendix F: Park and Trail Visitation data . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79 VIICentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 FIGURES Figure 1: Regional Trail Search Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Figure 2: RBTN Corridors . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 Figure 3: Central Greenway Regional Trail Location . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5 Figure 4: MLCCS Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7 Figure 5: Habitat Areas . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .9 Figure 6: Land Acquisition Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Figure 7: Land Acquisition and Acreage Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Figure 8: Segment Parcels for Acquisition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10 Figure 9: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 14 West of Lake Elmo Avenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 10: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 14 East of Lake Elmo Avenue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .11 Figure 11: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 15 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Figure 12: Primary Service Area Population Forecast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Figure 13: Regional Population Forecast . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13 Figure 14: Trail Primary Service Area Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Figure 17: Primary Service Area Age Distribution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .15 Figure 16: Primary Service Area Household Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure 15: Primary Service Area Race . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15 Figure 19: Existing Eight-Foot Wide Trail Segments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 Figure 18: Typical Trail Cross-Section . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .18 Figure 20: Wayfinding Signage Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20 Figure 21: Trailhead and Rest Stop Locations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Figure 22: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Alignment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 Figure 23: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Figure 24: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25 Figure 25: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Figure 26: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Figure 27: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R3 and R3A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Figure 28: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Figure 29: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R4 and B1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 Figure 30: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 and B2 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 Figure 31: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32 Figure 32: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 Figure 33: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Figure 34: Summary of public comments and responses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46 VIII Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment has been a team effort led by a dedicated group consisting of Washington County staff, along with local city and agency staff. PROJECT TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE »Connor Schaefer, Washington County »Abbi Wittman, City of Stillwater »Eric Johnson, City of Oak Park Heights »John Hanson, Valley Branch Watershed Organization »Mark Prchal, Washington County »Ben Prchal, City of Lake Elmo »Kevin Peterson, Washington County »Michael Peterka, Metropolitan Council »Dan MacSwain, Washington County »Jan Lucke, Washington County Public Works »Tracey Kinney, Metropolitan Council »Karen Kill, Brown’s Creek Watershed District PROJECT COMMUNITY ADVISORY COMMITTEE »Connor Schaefer, Washington County »John Mayek, Lake Elmo Parks & resident »Ben Prchal, Lake Elmo City Planner »Nathan Pulscher, Lakeview Hospital »Aaron Drevlow, SAHS A.P & community member »Tony Willger, Manager of Operations for ISD #384 »Calvin Jones, SASCA & Stillwater High School Bike Team »Stephen Ebner, West Lakeland Township »Sarah Hietpas, Metropolitan Council Park and Open Space Commission »Jyneen Thatcher, Washington County Park and Open Space Commission CONSULTING TEAM »SRF Consulting Group, Inc. »Stewart Crosby »Jonathan Fillmore Figure I: Central Greenway Regional Trail Location Executive Summary IXCentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Central Greenway Regional Trail will enhance the region’s multi-modal transportation and recreation system by providing a safe and accessible trail connection between three of the region’s premier regional park facilities, Big Marine Park Reserve, Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail will provide direct connections for people living in the suburban communities of Lake Elmo, Baytown Township, and Oak Park Heights to vital employment, retail, and recreational sites in the east metropolitan area – providing safety, economic development, mobility, and environmental benefits. TRAIL LOCATION This trail master plan amendment will cover segments of existing and proposed trail between Keats Avenue/County Road 19 and I-94 and Manning Avenue/County Road 15 and MN 36. The approximately 2.9 mile long trail segment starting at I-94 and extending along Keats Avenue/County Road 19 the majority of the way through Lake Elmo Park Reserve is developed. In addition, 0.2 miles of existing trail segments are located near the County Road 15 and County Road 14 intersection. There is also a 0.05 mile long existing trail segment near Stillwater High School along 58th Street. This plan includes designating these segments as a regional trail. In addition to the existing trail segments being designated to regional trail, this plan also proposes developing 5.25 miles of unbuilt trail along Stillwater Boulevard and a short unbuilt segment along Keats Avenue near the Lake Elmo Park Reserve pay station. When complete, the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail will connect to the existing South Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail, Lake Elmo Park Reserve, Downtown Lake Elmo, and Stillwater High School. NATURAL RESOURCE DESCRIPTION The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail corridor is located in the suburban community of Lake Elmo. The corridor makes a direct connection to Lake Elmo Park Reserve and extends adjacent to Sunfish Lake Park. Outside the park reserve, the topography of the corridor is mostly flat and is dominated by farmland and residential development. Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park Lake Elmo Park Reserve Big Marine Park ReserveCentral Greenway Regional Trail South Segment Existing Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail South Segment Proposed Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Existing Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail North Segment Search Corridor Parks Sunfish Lake Park Figure II: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Alignment Executive Summary X Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 The Central Greenway Regional Trail provides access to high quality natural resources in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The park includes oak forest, oak savanna, and prairie. The trail corridor also extends through a Rusty Patch Bumble Bee Habitat and Outdoor Heritage Fund Work Area. The Minnesota Land Cover Classification System (MLCCS) identifies the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail as three main land cover types. Between I-94 and County Road 10, the landscape is primarily classified as agricultural land. An agricultural land classification is also assigned for the majority of the landscape from downtown Lake Elmo to the MN 36. Through Lake Elmo Park Reserve, a mixture of forest and prairie land cover types are assigned. As one would expect, the majority of the area in downtown Lake Elmo is classified as impervious. DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT A fully developed Central Greenway Regional Trail will be a linking regional trail. The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail is an important link in the Washington County’s trail network. When fully developed, the Central Greenway Regional Trail will provide residents of Washington County with direct access to a regional trail that connects three premier regional park facilities: Big Marine Park Reserve, Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. In addition, the regional trail will provide a separated, off-road facility for recreation and transportation purposes that will connect with adjacent local trails and other destinations, such as Lake Elmo Park Reserve, downtown Lake Elmo, and Stillwater High School. Trail Segments The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail covered in this master plan amendment has been divided into six segments that are composed of developed and undeveloped trail (Figure III). The trail segments generally follow County Road 19/Keats Avenue alignment through Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Stillwater Boulevard (County Road 14 and County Road 15) to MN 36. The preferred trail alignment has one trail alternate. The alternate alignment identified is located in Lake Elmo Park Reserve where the trail crosses the Union Pacific Railroad. The preferred trail alignment shown utilizes the existing at-grade crossing or implementing a new grade separated crossing. The alternate trail Segment R3A crosses the railroad using a proposed underpass to avoid conflicts with the railroad traffic. Washington County will determine which alignment is best suited for trail development during trail design and implementation. In addition to the alternate trail alignment, two interim trail alignments are proposed. The first interim alignment, Segment B1, acts as a bypass to the proposed trail segment through downtown Lake Elmo. The existing right-of-way and current road width would make fitting a trail through downtown Lake Elmo using County Road 14 challenging. It is unlikely that the Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segments Segment From To Along Length R1 I-94 County Road 10 County Road 19/Keats Avenue 1.1 Miles R2 County Road 10 Park Maintenance Area Access Road Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 2.2 Miles R3 Park Maintenance Area Access Road Stillwater Lane North Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 1.0 Miles R3A Park Maintenance Area Access Road Stillwater Lane North Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 0.5 Miles R4 Stillwater Lane North County Road 15/Manning Avenue County Road 14/Stillwater Boulevard 1.7 Miles R5 County Road 15/Manning Avenue 58th Street North County Road 15/Stillwater Boulevard 1.9 Miles R6 58th Street North MN 36 58th Street North and future road 0.7 Miles B1 County Road 14 & County Road 17 39th Street N & County Road 14 County Road 17 and 39th Street N 0.8 Miles B2 County Road 14 & Stillwater Way Stillwater Way & County Road 15 Stillwater Way 0.7 Miles Figure III: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Map. LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE SUNFISH LAKE PARK GiWX GlWX ?ÇA@ !"b$ GnWX GsWX ?öA@ GoWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GoWX GlWX %&h( GoWX GoWX GkWX GnWX G¡WX GeWX Sf GoWX N00.25 0.50.125 Miles ?¸A@ CITY OF GRANT CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY OF PINE SPRINGS CITY OF MAHTOMEDI CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY OF BAYTOWN WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP CITY OF AFTON CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF OAKDALE Horseshoe Lake Jane Lake Lake Elmo Eagle Point Lake WhiteBearLake Lake Bielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack Rd RadioDrValley Creek RdWoodburyDrWeirDr75thStN 50th St N InterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson Ave Woodlane Dr HudsonRd Saint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvd Stillwater Rd 4th St N Cour tl y Rd Ma n n i n g Ave NLakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N 34th St N GreenwayAve7th St N 15th St N County Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N 50th St N 80th St N OlsonLake Tr N20th St NKeatsAveN Commerce Dr W ild w oodR dMckusickRdN IdealAveN39thSt N ManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN 40th StNJamacaAveN ManningTrNNealAveSStillwater Blvd N StillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrB2 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 B1 R3A Executive Summary XICentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Trail Sub Segments Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Executive Summary XII Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 trail through downtown Lake Elmo will be constructed until the County widens County Road 14. County Road 14 is currently not included in the County’s 5-year capital improvement plan (CIP). Therefore, an interim alignment that utilizes existing trail on 39th Street is proposed. Likewise, the second interim alignment, Segment B2, was proposed because the unbuilt regional trail segment extending along County Road 14 between Stillwater Way and County Road 15 was recently constructed. Therefore, an opportunity to construct this trail segment with roadway reconstruction project synergy is unlikely in the near future. Implementation It is anticipated that the regional trail will be implemented in stages, with the construction of various stages driven by available funding and local factors, such as timing of adjacent roadway improvements, and public desire to expand the regional trail system. Until the corridor is fully developed, gaps in the regional trail will exist. However, the ultimate trail geometry will consist of a 10-foot-wide (minimum) paved surface where possible, separate from any adjacent roadway, so that trail users will not share the roadway with motorized vehicles. Development Costs Regional trail development includes the cost to prepare the site; reconfigure roadways as required; modify drainage patterns where necessary; pave the trail; and install signage, striping, and landscaping. In total, the estimated development cost for the Central Greenway Regional Trail is $6,873,359. The cost includes rest stops, signage, grade-separated crossings, pedestrian crossing upgrades, and contingencies. The total cost for acquisitions within the proposed corridor is $1,417,000. Introduction 1Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 INTRODUCTION The Central Greenway Regional Trail will enhance the region’s multi-modal transportation and recreation system by providing a safe and accessible trail connection between three of the region’s premier regional park facilities, Big Marine Park Reserve, Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. The Central Greenway Regional Trail will provide direct connections for people living in central Washington County to vital employment, retail, and recreational sites in the east metropolitan area – providing safety, economic development, mobility, and environmental benefits. When completed, the trail route will measure approximately 25 miles from Big Marine Park Reserve at the north end of the corridor to Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park at the south end of the corridor. The Lake Elmo Segment covered in this master plan amendment measures approximately 8.6 miles. Opportunities for local trail connections will exist along the proposed trail route, and there will be connections to other local attractions including community parks. METRO REGIONAL PARK SYSTEM A system of Regional Trail Search Corridors was developed by the Metropolitan Council as part of the 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. The Metropolitan Council identified the Central Greenway Regional trail as one of several Regional Trail Search Corridors in Washington County (Figure 1). 57 2040 REGIONAL PARKS POLICY PLAN THREE: System Plan Figure 12: Regional Trail Search Corridors 1 2 3 4 567 3 789 9 1011 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 22 23 2425 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 353637 38 38 3940 41 42 43 44 45 45 46 Three RiversPark District Dakota County Anoka County Scott County Carver County Ramsey County Washington CountySt. PaulMinneapolisPark & Rec Board Bloomington Figure 3-9: Regional Trail Search Corridors 0 5 10 15 202.5 Miles City and Township Boundaries County Boundaries Lakes and Rivers Regional Parks, Park Reserves, Special Recreation Features Existing Regional Trails Planned Regional Trails Regional Trail Search Corridors Numbers correspond to the regional trail search corridors listed in Table 3-9 Figure 1: Regional Trail Search Corridors Source: Metropolitan Council Regional Trail Search Corridors - 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan Introduction 2 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 REGIONAL BICYCLE TRANSPORTATION NETWORK Washington County trails and the local trail network are further supported and enhanced by the Regional Bicycle Transportation Network (RBTN), which is identified as part of the 2040 Transportation Policy Plan (TPP). The RBTN helps define the region’s on-street bikeways and off-street trail connections, and how they work together to serve regional transportation trips by bicycle. The RBTN is also used to identify corridors and alignments for future trail development and infrastructure investments. These corridors and alignments provide transportation connectivity to outlying regional destinations within and beyond the urban/suburban areas and serve to connect priority regional bicycle transportation corridors/ alignments. County Road 19/Keats Avenue from County Road 14 to the Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park entrance is recognized as a Tier 2 Corridor and assigned the second tier priority for regional transportation funding. County Road 15 and County Road 14 is also recognized as a Tier 2 Corridor. (Figure 2). Thus, the proposed alignment for the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail should be considered for inclusion as a Tier 2 alignment in the TPP update (2018), making it a priority for federal funds distributed via Metropolitan Council’s Regional Solicitation. WASHINGTON COUNTY PARKS OVERVIEW Washington County Parks Division is responsible for planning, building, and maintaining over 4,400 acres of regional and county park land. Furthermore, the County provides over 75 miles of turf and paved trails that offer recreational opportunities and non-motorized transportation options. The Parks Division also programs activities and events throughout the year. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANS The Central Greenway Regional Trail’s proposed route through Lake Elmo does not conflict with the Lake Elmo Park Reserve master plan, as the route utilizes an existing trail. The Central Greenway Regional Trail proposed route is also compliant with Washington County’s Comprehensive Plan and the comprehensive plans of the local cities. INVOLVED PUBLIC AGENCIES Washington County engaged multiple public agencies as part of the master planning process. These agencies participated as part of the Technical Advisory Committee (refer to the Public Engagement chapter for more information). Furthermore, the County met with these agencies one-on-one as needed throughout the process. Introduction 3Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 2: RBTN Corridors Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Regional Trails Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) RBTN Tier 1 Corridors RBTN Tier 2 Corridors RBTN Tier 2 Alignments 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Introduction 4 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 5Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION I: BOUNDARIES & ACQUISITIONS LOCATION AND CONTEXTUAL RELATIONSHIP The Central Greenway Regional Trail will extend from Big Marine Park Reserve in May Township south to Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park in the City of Cottage Grove. The trail will be a Regional Linking Trail, as defined by the Metropolitan Council. Linking trails are intended to provide connections between regional parks or park reserves. The Central Greenway Regional Trail will provide a connection between Big Marine Park Reserve and Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park, generally along the County Road 19/Keats Avenue corridor south of Lake Elmo Park Reserve and generally along County Road 14 and County Road 15 north of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. This trail master plan amendment will cover the segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail that extends from I-94 to MN 36. In this plan, this portion of the corridor will be referred to as the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail. The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail consists of 5.25 miles of unbuilt trail primarily along Stillwater Boulevard with small unbuilt segments inside Lake Elmo Park Reserve and 3.35 miles of existing trail primarily between Lake Elmo Park Reserve and I-94. Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park Lake Elmo Park Reserve Big Marine Park ReserveCentral Greenway Regional Trail South Segment Existing Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail South Segment Proposed Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Existing Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Trail Central Greenway Regional Trail North Segment Search Corridor Parks Sunfish Lake Park Figure 3: Central Greenway Regional Trail Location Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 6 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 NATURAL RESOURCES The Central Greenway Regional Trail corridor is located in a suburban edge area with connections to local and regional trails and parks in both the City of Woodbury and the City of Cottage Grove. The trail corridor is mostly flat. The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail corridor is located primarily in the suburban community of Lake Elmo. The corridor makes a direct connection to Lake Elmo Park Reserve and extends near Sunfish Lake Park. Both of these parks contain native plant communities which harbor rare and unique wildlife. The topography of the corridor is mostly flat and winds through residential development, a park reserve, and agricultural areas. The Central Greenway Regional Trail provides direct access to high quality natural resources in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. A few of the land cover classifications found within Lake Elmo Park Reserve are Oak savanna, prairie, aspen glade, and mixed deciduous forest (Figure 5). These native plant communities provide great habitat for species such as the Rusty Patch Bumblebee which has been found close to the trail corridor and is illustrated in Figure 5. During design and construction of the trail, extra measures will be taken to ensure high quality habitat or grant work areas are not impacted. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) has documented several rare species and high-quality plant communities near the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail corridor. A one-mile buffer surrounding the project limits was evaluated for the presence of rare plants, animals, native plant communities, and other rare features using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in conjunction with the MnDNR’s Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) (Copyright 2016 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources). The Natural Heritage data is provided by the Division of Ecological Resources, Minnesota DNR, and was current as of February 2016 (license agreement 625). These data are not based on an exhaustive inventory of the state. The lack of data for any geographic area shall not be construed to mean that no significant features are present. All documented observances are not directly adjacent to the regional trail and are not anticipated to be impacted by the regional trail. There were seven species identified within one- mile of the Central Greenway Regional Trail. A complete list of species is provided in ”Appendix D: Rare Species List” on page 75. No specialized maintenance or construction is proposed for the regional trail corridor to manage any wildlife adapted to urbanized conditions. Native Plantings & Pollinator Habitats Washington County is committed to providing healthy habitat for wildlife. This includes pollinators, such as bees, birds, bats, and other insects, who play a crucial role in flowering plant reproduction and in the production of most fruits and vegetables. Providing habitat for pollinators has a number of benefits: »Native flowers and the wildlife they attract will add visual interest to the corridor. »Habitat corridors provide the connectivity of habitats that are important for species migration, dispersal, and mixing. »Prairie plants help infiltrate water, one acre of established prairie can absorb 9” of rainfall per hour before runoff occurs - capturing stormwater pollutants and increasing groundwater recharge. »Cost savings from a reduction in mowing area and frequency. »Reduced noise for trail users adjacent to the roadway. »Reduce heat from adjacent roadway, and reduce exposure to car emissions. »Increases food production for neighborhood gardens and farms. »Habitat offers opportunities for people to connect to the land via education, volunteering and community involvement. In the development of the Central Greenway Regional Trail, the County will consider planting pollinator-friendly vegetation along the trail buffer, outside a 2-foot mowed shoulder. The Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 7Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 4: MLCCS Map 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Parks Central Greenway Lake Elmo Segment (on new trail) Central Greenway Lake Elmo Segment (on existing trail) Existing Central Greenway Lake South Segment Existing Paved Trails Existing County Soft Surface Trail Gateway State Trail MLCCS Impervious Agricultural Land Dry Tall Grasses Forest Maintained Tall Grass Mud Flat Tree Plantation Rock Outcrop Short Grasses Shrubland Tall Grassland Wetland Emergent Veg. Wetland Forest Wetland Shrubs Wetland Open Water Open Water Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 8 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 vegetation will be planted where appropriate, as to match the aesthetic of the adjacent landscape. Specific locations will be determined during the design and development phase. In particular, the portion of the trail through Lake Elmo Park Reserve will be considered because it is surrounded by and inside a high quality natural resource. A diverse native seed mixes designed by the Minnesota Board of Water and Soil Resources which are comprised of native grasses and flowers would likely be used. Where pollinator-friendly vegetation is planted, Washington County will coordinate the necessary maintenance. This will include annual mowing during the first one to two years of establishment to provide sunlight and to decrease competition for seedlings. Once established, the following maintenance activities will be used; controlled burns, haying and mowing, and noxious weed control on an as-needed basis, based on yearly staff assessments. Site Suitability The preferred corridor is well suited for a regional trail. The topography is gentle and little wetland impacts are anticipated. Special Assessments None anticipated. Contamination No contamination in the proposed corridor is known at this time. Other Conditions that Affect Boundaries None anticipated. ACQUISITION STATUS The Central Greenway Regional Trail consists of developed and undeveloped segments in the corridor between Interstate 94 and MN 36. Existing local trails used throughout the preferred regional trail alignment will be identified as segments of the regional trail. No land acquisitions are needed for these segments of trail. The Central Greenway Regional Trail north of Lake Elmo Park Reserve is mostly undeveloped. As a general guideline, Washington County Parks will attempt to work within the established right-of-way along County Roads. Washington County will coordinate with the local municipalities and other potentially affected agencies, including MnDOT, as needed if additional right-of-way is necessary for trail development. The proposed trail alignments along Stillwater Boulevard have been identified with the understanding that future roadway improvements, such as widening the road to four lanes, would require additional right-of-way. If, in the future, the County expands the roadway and additional land is acquired, it is assumed that the proposed roadway plans will include trails in the design. As such, additional right-of-way acquisitions, if needed for incorporating the regional trail adjacent to a future county road widening project, was not studied as part the this master plan amendment. In the event Washington County does not expand Stillwater Boulevard or trail development precedes roadway improvements, additional right-of-way will be required to develop the proposed trail. The amount of right-of-way required depends on the existing conditions. There are nine locations identified in this master plan amendment where additional right-of-way may be required to develop or improve the proposed regional trail. These segments and the right-of-way needed are identified in more detail below and in Figure 6. BOUNDARIES & ACQUISITION COSTS The Central Greenway Regional Trail corridor is planned for development within the public right-of-way. Several segments of the proposed regional trail exist and need little or no improvement. Nine locations may need additional right-of- way for development (Figure 6). The first eight parcels that potentially require acquisition are located along County Road 14 between Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Downtown Lake Elmo. It is anticipated that parcel 1 will require 75 feet of additional right-of-way for a total width of 225 feet. Parcel 2 will require an additional 50 feet of additional right-of-way for a total of 116 feet (Figure 9). Parcels 3 through eight will require an additional 20 feet of right-of-way for a total of 110 feet (Figure 10). The ninth parcel requiring additional right-of-way acquisition is located Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 9Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 5: Habitat Areas Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Regional Trails Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) Rusty Patch Bumble Bee Habitat Outdoor Heritage Fund Work Area 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 10 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 along County Road 15. It is anticipated that an additional 20 feet of right-of-way is required to construct the regional trail at this location to widen the road right-of-way to 150 feet (Figure 11). The anticipated cost to acquire the necessary right-of-way for these segments is approximately $1,417,000, as shown in Figure 7. Willing Seller Policy The regional trail acquisition process is typically a “willing- seller” approach. This means parcel acquisition typically occurs when a property owner is willing and ready to sell, and several acquisition alternatives are often evaluated to best meet the needs of the property owner and the implementing agency. In addition, it is also common for an implementing agency to closely coordinate with local and regional agencies to partner on other opportunities that may assist in securing the required trail right-of-way. At this time, it is difficult to determine when an acquisition will occur and when the trail construction will begin. Acquisition alternatives may include the following: »Route the regional trail to use portions of the property with marginal development potential. This could include land adjacent to wetland or flood fringes. »Acquire regional trail easements for the trail route through owner/developer negotiations that may include redevelopment incentives. »Work with the city and owner/developer to secure park dedication lands for the regional trail in advance of the actual development as applicable. »Coordinate with city initiatives that may result in the acquisition of the entire property/parcel, with the intent to resell the property subject to easements for the regional trail. »Acquire the development rights to the property. Development areas would then be negotiated with the developer. »Accept donations for portions of the property for the regional trail corridor. »Acquire a portion of the property through purchase. Figure 6: Land Acquisition Map Segment Acres Total Cost* Segment R4 Subtotal 3.40 $1,102,000 Segment R5 Subtotal 0.31 $315,000 Total 3.71 $1,417,000 Segment Parcel ID R4 14.029.21.42.0003 R4 14.029.21.41.0002 R4 13.029.21.23.0071 R4 13.029.21.23.0067 R4 13.029.21.23.0``042 R4 13.029.21.23.0043 R4 13.029.21.23.0044 R4 13.029.21.23.0077 R5 06.029.20.34.0009 Figure 7: Land Acquisition and Acreage Summary Figure 8: Segment Parcels for Acquisition *Estimated costs reflect 2019 tax assessed values only for the portion of parcel needed. GATEWAY STATE TRAIL LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE SUNFISH LAKE PARK GiWX GlWX ?ÇA@ !"b$ GnWX GsWX ?öA@ GoWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GoWX GlWX %&h( GoWX GoWX GkWX GnWX G¡WX GeWX Sf GoWX N00.25 0.50.125 Miles ?¸A@ CITY OF GRANT CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY OF PINE SPRINGS CITY OF MAHTOMEDI CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY OF BAYTOWN WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP CITY OF AFTON CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF OAKDALE Horseshoe Lake Jane Lake Lake Elmo Sunfish Lake Eagle Point Lake WhiteBearLake Lake Bielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack Rd RadioDrValley Creek RdWoodburyDrWeirDr75thStN 50th St N InterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson Ave Woodlane D r H u d sonRd Saint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudson Blvd Stillwater Rd 4th St N CourtlyRd Manni n g Av eNLakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N 34th St N GreenwayAve7th St N 15th St N County Rd 71BoutwellRd N43rd St N 50th St N 80th St N Ol sonLakeTr N20th St NKeatsAveN Commerce Dr WildwoodRd Mckusick RdN IdealAveN39th St N ManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN 40th St NJamacaAveN ManningTrNNealAveSStillwaterBlvdN StillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrAcquisition Area Segment R 4 Segment R50 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 11Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SUNFISH LAKE PROPOSED GROUND LINE EXISTING GROUND LINE Figure 9: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 14 West of Lake Elmo Avenue Figure 10: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 14 East of Lake Elmo Avenue Figure 11: Typical Section for the Proposed Trail along CR 15 Section I: Boundaries & Acquisitions 12 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank Section II: Demand Forecast 13Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION II: DEMAND FORECAST DEMOGRAPHIC OVERVIEW In general, recreation use trends are affected by demographic trends. By analyzing statewide and regional data, Washington County can begin to assess how the Central Greenway Regional Trail will function within the larger trail network. STATEWIDE AND REGIONAL TRENDS The 2014-2018 State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan (SCORP), published by the Minnesota DNR, gives outdoor recreation decision-makers and managers a focused set of priorities and suggested actions to guide them as they make decisions about outdoor recreation. The SCORP outlines outdoor recreation trends, challenges, and issues, including protecting existing natural resources, sustaining existing facilities, promoting healthy lifestyles, connecting people with nature, and an increasing demand for a diverse range of recreation opportunities based upon population changes. The Metropolitan Council’s 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan notes that, according to SCORP, several studies show that involvement in nature-based outdoor recreation among young adults and their children had decreased since the 1990s. SCORP also notes that location plays an important role because many users of the regional trail system live within three miles of the park or trail that they utilize. Regional trails play an important role because they provide healthful forms of exercise for people of all age groups that can be carried out by families, groups, or individuals. According to SCORP, Minnesota’s growth rate has increased since 2000, but at a slower rate than in the 1990s. Although population growth in the state has slowed, the geographic pattern of growth remained largely the same with the high growth areas centered on the Twin Cities metropolitan area. This new growth will fuel demands for near-home recreation opportunities in these areas. The Metropolitan Council’s Thrive 2040 MSP forecasted growth rate for the Central Greenway Trail’s primary service area is anticipated to increase by close to 30,000 people from 2020 to 2040 (Figure 12). Outside factors such as gas prices, trail infrastructure improvements, and increased local sidewalk and trail network connectivity, may also promote increased use as trail users look for more recreation opportunities closer to home and use of the regional trail system as part of their transportation network. Within fully developed areas where population levels are expected to remain relatively stable, trail visitation levels and type of use will also reflect shifting demographics of those areas. METHODOLOGY To analyze demographics specific to the Central Greenway Regional Trail, Washington County used a quantitative measuring methodology that identifies a primary service area that is three miles on all sides of the proposed trail corridor (Figure 14). This methodology provides detail specific to the primary service area for the proposed trail corridor, which is defined as users within three miles of the trail corridor. The demographic data on the following pages is based on the primary service area. Figure 12: Primary Service Area Population Forecast Source: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 MSP Forecast As of January 1, 2018 132,746 150,120 164,380 177,880 ‐ 20,000 40,000 60,000 80,000 100,000 120,000 140,000 160,000 180,000 200,000 2010 2020 2030 2040 Primary Service Area Population Forecast Figure 13: Regional Population Forecast Source: Metropolitan Council Thrive 2040 MSP Forecast As of January 1, 2018 0 200,000 400,000 600,000 800,000 1,000,000 1,200,000 1,400,000 1,600,000 Anoka County Carver County Dakota County Hennepin County Ramsey County Scott County Washington County Regional Population Forecast 2020 2030 2040 Section II: Demand Forecast 14 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 14: Trail Primary Service Area Map 0 1 20.5 Miles CITY OF LAKE ELMO LAKE ELMOPARK RESERVE White Bear Lake Lake Elmo St. Croix RiverCITY OF GRANT CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF MAHTOMEDI CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS BAYTOWNTOWNSHIP WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP 3 MILES CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF AFTON CITY OF OAKDALE BROWNS CREEK STATE TRA I L GATEWAY STATE TRAILGiWX ?ÇA@ !"b$ GnWX GsWX GsWX ?öA@ ?öA@ ?A@ GqWX GqWX GlWX GlWX %&h(GoWX GoWX GkWX GnWX GeWX ?¸A@ 96 GoWX Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Service Area Regional Parks City Parks Existing Regional Trail Regional Trail Search Corridor Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Existing Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Trail 0 0.5 1 miNORTH AGING POPULATION While the trend of young adults and their children shows a reduction in their involvement in nature-based recreation, SCORP notes that older adults have maintained a more stable involvement in outdoor recreation. Older adult recreation habits are well established and demand for their preferred activities will continue to be strong. However, as this group ages, physical limitations will require some park and trail visitors to change their recreational activities from higher intensity activities such as running, in-line skating, and biking to lower-impact recreational activities such as walking, nature observation, and educational opportunities. Many of these activities are accommodated by the regional trail system. The Central Greenway Regional Trail provides a recreational opportunity for older residents. A continuous, wide, and separated trail with limited elevation changes will serve this population well. Figure 17 shows that approximately 24 percent of the residents in the primary service area are currently between the ages of 40 and 54. MINORITY POPULATIONS Metropolitan Council demographers anticipate that by 2040, 40 percent of the region’s population will be people of color, compared with 24 percent in 2010. Within the region, there are three prevalent immigrant groups: Asians, Hispanic/Latino, and Black or African Americans. Within the primary service area, 11 percent of the population are non-white (Figure 15). Washington County will look to provide trail amenities to accommodate trail users of all backgrounds. One strategy that will be explored is providing multi-lingual signage. OTHER TRENDS AFFECTING RECREATION A 2017 study by the Minnesota Department of Health found that statewide 28.4 percent of adults were obese and 36.5 percent were overweight. Obesity is a key predictor for many future health problems, including diabetes. Lack of adequate exercise – partially resulting from inadequate outdoor recreation facilities or opportunities – is often cited as a contributor to obesity. Many young people are not getting enough exercise and face future health risks as a result. The economic health of the state relies on continued use and enjoyment of our outdoor recreation resources. Availability of a wide range of outdoor recreation opportunities is one of the factors most often cited as contributing to the state’s perceived high quality of life. Participation in outdoor recreation may correspond to a greater Section II: Demand Forecast 15Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 17: Primary Service Area Age Distribution Source: American Community Survey, 2016 0% 2% 4% 6% 8% 10% 12% Age Distribution Figure 15: Primary Service Area Race Source: American Community Survey, 2016 White89% Black or African American 2% Asian4% Hispanic or Latino3%Two or more races2% Figure 16: Primary Service Area Household Description Source: American Community Survey, 2016 es Unmarried families with children6% Families without children 43% Married families with children26% Lived alone21% Non-family households4% Section II: Demand Forecast 16 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 interest in and support for measures to protect land, facilities, and resources necessary to ensure those same activities are available for future generations. Population growth in the region and the primary service area will lead to an increase in the demand for recreational opportunities within Washington County. New trails, such as the Central Greenway Regional Trail, will be needed to accommodate the increase in demand. ACTIVE LIVING BY DESIGN – A COMPLEMENTARY VISION The “active living by design” movement gaining momentum across the country complements the vision for the regional trail. As stated by one of the initiators of the movement, active living by design “is a way of life that integrates physical activity into daily routines.” Key principles of this movement as it pertains to this plan include: »Physical activity is a behavior that can favorably improve health and quality of life. »Everyone, regardless of age, gender, language, ethnicity, economic status or ability, should have safe, convenient and affordable choices for physical activity. »Parks and trails, should be safe, accessible and part of a transportation network that connects destinations of interest, such as other parks, housing, schools, work sites, transit, community services and businesses. »Municipalities and other governing bodies should plan for ongoing interdisciplinary collaboration, promotion of facilities, behavioral supports, policies that support the vision of active living, and routine maintenance that ensures continued safety, quality and attractiveness of the physical infrastructure and the natural environment. The following provides an overview of pertinent findings from research that supports the active living movement and development of this regional trail. PHYSICAL ACTIVITY/PREVENTING OBESITY Physical inactivity causes numerous physical and mental health problems, is responsible for an estimated 200,000 deaths per year in the United States, and contributes to the obesity epidemic. The design of communities and the presence or absence of parks, trails, and other quality public recreational facilities affects people’s ability to reach the recommended 30 minutes each day of moderately intense physical activity. A growing number of studies show that people in activity-friendly environments are more likely to be physically active in their leisure time. For example, research findings clearly indicate that better access to facilities, pleasant surroundings, safe places, walkable neighborhoods, and activity-friendly environments all encourage higher levels of active recreation. Proximity, connectivity, and design quality of trails can be added to this list to encourage more active lifestyles. This is especially the case with children, where better access to healthy choices is vital to reducing the rate of obesity. Since the 1970s the percentage of obese children 6 to 11 years old has tripled. Obesity has doubled among preschool children and Section II: Demand Forecast 17Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 adolescents. Turning these statistics around means increasing children’s physical activity and improving what they eat. CONNECTIVITY AND ACCESSIBILITY Being able to reach or access a variety of destinations (e.g., parks, retail areas, tourist site, workplaces, health services, grocery stores) via trails is critical to many dimensions of a healthy community and healthy personal lifestyle. Ensuring that trails meet ADA standards is important to accommodate the broadest cross-section of user groups. MENTAL HEALTH A number of studies have demonstrated how being outdoors and in direct contact with nature leads to improved mental health and psychological development. Recent data show that mental health disorders will account for some of the world’s largest health problems in upcoming decades. People do not have to actively use nature to benefit from it; rather, visual exposure is enough. The outdoor experience offered along the Central Greenway Regional Trail will, at some level, contribute positively to the collective well-being of the communities along the trail corridor. STATEWIDE HEALTH IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (SHIP) Washington County, through the SHIP program, has developed the Living Healthy in Washington County initiative in order to implement policies and practices that create active communities by increasing opportunities for non-motorized transportation and access to community resources and recreation facilities. EXISTING WASHINGTON COUNTY USE DATA Washington County and the Metropolitan Council collect data and produce reports on who visits regional parks and trails, and how they are being used. These reports allow Washington County to track visitation and usage data overtime, and assess performance. Determining the types of users and their needs is an important step when evaluating future park and trail needs. Ultimately, this information helps Washington County make informed decisions for planning, building, and maintaining the parks and trails system. Park and trail visitation data developed in the Washington County 2040 comprehensive plan can be found in “Appendix F: Park and Trail Visitation data” on page 79. Section III: Development Concept 18 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION III: DEVELOPMENT CONCEPT When fully developed, the Central Greenway Regional Trail will provide residents of Washington County with direct access to a regional trail that connects three premier regional park facilities: Big Marine Park Reserve, Lake Elmo Park Reserve and Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park. In addition, the regional trail will provide a separated, off-road facility for recreation and transportation purposes that will connect with adjacent local trails and other amenities, such as Stillwater High School and Downtown Lake Elmo. DEVELOPMENT PLAN Permitted Regional Trail Uses The regional trail will be open to the general public. Its intended uses include walking, jogging, in-line skating, bicycling, and other uses mandated by state law including, but not limited to, non-motor electric personal assisted devices. Motorized vehicle and equestrian uses will be prohibited, except for motorized vehicles used by the Washington County and partner cities for maintenance or law enforcement activities or otherwise permitted for ADA access. Adjacent Uses Along the west side of County Road 15, north of 43rd Street, the Star Trail Snowmobile Association maintains a snowmobile trail. During implementation, Washington County will work with the snowmobile community to accommodate snowmobile use parallel to the paved trail, where possible, or to identify alternative routes that would meet their needs. Washington has demonstrated successful coordination of snowmobile use adjacent to regional trails with Hardwood Creek Regional Trail. Regional Trail Design Guidelines The trail design for the Central Greenway Regional Trail is a 10-foot-wide paved surface separated from vehicular traffic (Figure 18). There may be instances that require the trail to be temporarily reduced in width for short segments until funding is available to improve sections that do not meet typical regional trail design guidelines (Figure 19). A bituminous trail surface is preferred because it is cost-effective, less prone to erosion than aggregate surfaces, provides for a more desirable trail user experience. Figure 18: Typical Trail Cross-Section Shoulder/Clear Zone2’-0” Min. 3’-0”Clear to Edge of Sign Paved Trail10’-0” Vertical Clear Zone10’-0” CL Typical 10-foot regional trail. From To Along Length Interstate 94 Boat launch Access Road Keats Avenue/ CR 19 2.9 Miles County Road 17*County Road 14*39th Street 0.5 Miles* 39th Street Stillwater Way County Road 14 0.2 Miles County Road 14*County Road 15*Stillwater Way 0.5 Miles* County Road 15 Minnesota Avenue 58th Street 0.05 Miles *Interim alignment Figure 19: Existing Eight-Foot Wide Trail Segments Section III: Development Concept 19Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 A number of factors will be taken into consideration as final designs for unconstructed segments are implemented, such as: »Right-of-way width »Topography and drainage impacts »Existing vegetation »Curb cuts and driveway crossings »Overhead and subsurface utilities »Intersection crossings »Proximity to adjacent structures and properties In circumstances with limited right-of-way, trails will still be located off-road, but with less boulevard between the trail edge and back of curb. In these locations, the trail will be separated from the road by a minimum paved two-foot-wide clear zone. This paved clear zone between the back of curb and trail edge provides a buffer between the trail users and motorists and will be striped to delineate the edge of the trail. Curb ramps will be used at all roadways. Regional trails should have a maximum of five percent grade and a cross slope of two percent for drainage. In addition, where right-of-way allows, final trail design will attempt to maximize the boulevard width to account for sign placement and snow storage. A regional trail may be wider than 10 feet if forecasted user volumes warrant an increased width and space is available for the trail. For example, the potential for bike and pedestrian conflicts was mentioned during the community engagement process. This master plan addresses this concern in several ways. The plan proposed widening the trail to 12 feet, where possible, allowing more space for trail users. The plan also states that the appropriate type of trail crossing treatments for each crossing location will be designed in accordance with industry best practices, in order to minimize conflicts between trail users and roadway traffic. Also, the regional trail segment extending through Lake Elmo Park Reserve may include additional limestone and/or bituminous shoulders to accommodate the higher pedestrian and cyclist usage. Finally, Washington County will consider stripping and signage to help minimize trail user conflicts. Regional trail segments will be designed in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local codes. In addition, the following sources will be referred and adhered to when preparing the design and construction plans as appropriate: »Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities, prepared by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO), 2012 »MnDOT Bikeway Facility Design Manual, Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT), March 2007 10-foot regional trail with limestone shoulder. 16-foot regional trail with bicycle and pedestrian zone. Section III: Development Concept 20 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 »State Aid Rule 8820.9995 Minimum Bicycle Path Standards, State Aid for Local Transportation »Trail Planning, Design, and Development Guidelines, Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MnDNR) »Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), MnDOT, 2014 »Public Right-of-Way Access Guidelines (PROWAG) »Best Practices for Traffic Control at Regional Trail Crossings, A collaborative effort of Twin Cities road and trail managing agencies, July 2011 »Selecting Roadway Design Treatments to Accommodate Bicycles, Federal Highway Administration, January 1994 »Bicycle and Pedestrian Wayfinding, Metropolitan Council, October 2011 PRIMARY TRAIL DESIGN ELEMENTS Trail Crossings The suburban setting for the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail requires that it coexist with higher volume roadways. There are numerous locations where the regional trail crosses such roadways, including: »County Road 10 »County Road 14 »50th Street »58th Street The types of trail crossing treatments appropriate for each crossing location will be designed in accordance with industry best practices, in order to minimize conflicts between trail users and roadway traffic. In all cases, existing roadway configuration, infrastructure elements, vegetation, and other potential visual obstructions will be evaluated so sight lines can be maintained. Special provisions, such as mirrors, may be added to improve trail visibility from driveways if deemed appropriate. As vehicular traffic fluctuates, there may be a need for additional traffic signals or modifications to existing signalized intersections. These type of design considerations and trail enhancements will be addressed during the trail design development phase. Trail Underpasses/Overpasses It may be appropriate to install a grade-separated trail underpass or overpass in some situations where the regional trail crosses higher volume roadways or railroads. The benefit of a trail underpass/overpass is that it provides safe access to the other side of a high-volume roadway or the Union Pacific Railroad without interaction with vehicular or train traffic. Several factors need to be considered when planning the location for underpasses/overpasses. Groundwater levels, existing grades and sufficient right-of-way are all important considerations to assess when locating underpasses. These types of design considerations and trail enhancements will be addressed during the trail design development phase. SUPPORTING TRAIL ELEMENTS Trail wayfinding signage, traffic signage and devices, rest stops, and drainage are important elements of regional trails. Their Figure 20: Wayfinding Signage Locations Trailheads Eagle Point Trailhead Lake Elmo Elementary School/Lake Elmo City Hall Stillwater High School Rest Stops Keats Avenue/County Road 19 and 5th Street Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road and Boat Launch Access Road 50th Street and Stillwater Boulevard Directional Signs Keats Avenue/County Road 19 and County Road 10 Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road and Swim Pond Access Road Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road and Boat Launch Access Road Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road and County Road 14 County Road 14 and County Road 17 County Road 14 and Laverne Avenue County Road 14 and Stillwater Way County Road 14 and County Road 15 County Road 15 and 50th Street County Road 15 and 58th Street Section III: Development Concept 21Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 21: Trailhead and Rest Stop Locations G A T EW AY STATE TR AILLAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE SUNFISH LAKE PARK GiWX GlWX ?ÇA@ !"b$ GnWX GsWX ?öA@ GoWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GoWX GlWX %&h( GoWX GoWX GkWX GnWX G¡WX GeWX Sf GoWX N00.25 0.50.125 Miles ?¸A@ CITY OF GRANT CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY OF PINE SPRINGS CITY OF MAHTOMEDI CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY OF BAYTOWN WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP CITY OF AFTON CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF OAKDALE Horseshoe Lake Jane Lake Lake Elmo SunfishLake Eagle Point Lake WhiteBearLake Lake Bielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack Rd RadioDrValley Creek RdWoodburyDrWeirDr75thStN 50th St N InterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson Ave Woodlane Dr HudsonRd Saint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvd Stillwater Rd 4th St N Cour tl y Rd Ma n n i n g Ave NLakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N 34th St N GreenwayAve7th St N 15th St N County Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N 50th St N 80th St N OlsonLake Tr N20th St NKeatsAveN Commerce Dr W ild w oodR dMckusickRdN IdealAveN39thSt N ManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN 40th StNJamacaAveN ManningTrNNealAveSStillwater Blvd N StillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrR R R TH TH TH D D D D D D D D D D Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Regional Trails Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) Regional Trail Rest Stop Regional Trail Trailhead Regional Trail Directional Sign 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH R TH D Trailhead at Stillwater High School Eagle Point Trailhead Trailhead at Lake Elmo Elementary School/Lake Elmo City Hall Section III: Development Concept 22 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 proper design and placement add both aesthetic and functional value to the trail. Wayfinding Signage Regional trail wayfinding signage provides trail users with orientation and location information for amenities and services. Wayfinding signage may provide: »An overview map of the regional trail network in Washington County, and the specific regional trail. »Directions and distances to major destinations and points of interest along the regional trail. »Directions for long-term detours or interim routes when there are gaps within the regional trail. »Location information for nearby amenities such as local parks and local trails. »Location information for nearby services, such as drinking water, public restrooms, and public parking. »Visual identification of the regional trail network through physical kiosk/signage structures. The suburban nature of the Central Greenway Regional Trail requires wayfinding signage at strategic delineated points (Figure 20 & Figure 21). These typically include major roadway intersections with other trails, trailheads, parks or other adjacent public facilities. The exact location and content of wayfinding signage will be determined in conjunction with local community input and is often dictated by available public right-of-way. Washington County Parks uses kiosks in their parks as wayfinding signage to identify trail routes and system amenities. Developing directional signage for the Central Greenway Regional Trail that includes visual indication of direction and location of points of interest along the trail will benefit trail users along the trail route. The design of the directional sign can include arrow blades and/ or text to identify features. Descriptions of each are as follows: Kiosks: A free-standing structure that provides trail users with a map of the park or trail system, the park or trail rules, and general information about the park or trail. Directional Signage: A post structure depicting the direction, the name, and the distance to major destinations and points of interest on the trail. Rest Stops Rest stops are located at key locations and provide places for trail users to stop and rest along the trail and an area for amenities such as benches, and bicycle racks. These simple but important amenities can serve to reinforce the identity of the regional trail route. Comments received from the public during the open house at Stillwater High School informed which amenities were included at rest stops. Locations for rest stops are shown in Figure 20. All rest stops will be further evaluated and incorporated into Central Greenway Regional Trail as appropriate during design and implementation. The cost per rest stop is approximately $7,000 each (2018 dollars). 11/21/2014 2Hardwood Creek Trail Branding Bridge Inspired Example of kiosk concept and signage for Washington County trails. (Artwork provided by Washington County) Hardwood Creek kiosk and rest stop. (Photo provided by Washington County) Section III: Development Concept 23Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Trailheads Trailheads are located at key locations along the trail and provide a place for trail users to access the trail using their car. The proposed trailhead locations utilize existing parking lots. Besides parking, other amenities such as drinking fountains, portable toilets, bike repair stations, and wayfinding kiosks are also included at trailheads. These amenities were selected based off of public comments received during the open house at Stillwater High School. Traffic Signage and Devices In addition to wayfinding signage, the regional trail will incorporate traffic control signs and devices, such as trail stop signs and trail crossing signage. These signs and devices will reflect the physical characteristics and usability of individual trail segments and the system as a whole. Therefore, as trail segments are developed (or reconstructed), trail signs and devices may require modification. The cost to add traffic control signs and devices, to a regional trail is approximately $1.50 per linear foot. Drainage In many locations, the drainage of the regional trail is similar to that of a typical sidewalk. Stormwater sheet flows over the trail pavement and onto the adjacent roadway, where it is collected and conveyed by the roadway stormwater drainage system. In areas where the regional trail is on an independent route, such as through parks or other green spaces, alternative stormwater best management practices, such as rain gardens and infiltration swales, may be explored during the design phase of the regional trail. Stormwater must shed rapidly from the surface of the trail to prevent hazardous situations for the users, such as water pooling on the trail surface. ROUTE ASSESSMENT The section of the Central Greenway Regional Trail covered in this master plan amendment has been divided into six segments that are composed of developed and undeveloped trail (Figure 22 & Figure 23). To preserve and protect the longevity of the trail and rights and responsibilities associated with owning, operating, and maintaining a regional trail, public trail easements are recommended for the entire corridor, regardless of the compliance of existing segments with the design standards of the governing agency. Securing easements to bring non- compliant trail segments into compliance is important, but it is less important than securing easements for trail sections that currently do not exist. The trail segments are described on the following page. Figure 22: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Proposed Alignment Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segments Segment From To Along Length R1 I-94 County Road 10 County Road 19/Keats Avenue 1.1 Miles R2 County Road 10 Park Maintenance Area Access Road Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 2.2 Miles R3 Park Maintenance Area Access Road Stillwater Lane North Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 1.0 Miles R3A Park Maintenance Area Access Road Stillwater Lane North Lake Elmo Park Reserve Access Road 0.5 Miles R4 Stillwater Lane North County Road 15/Manning Avenue County Road 14/Stillwater Boulevard 1.7 Miles R5 County Road 15/Manning Avenue 58th Street North County Road 15/Stillwater Boulevard 1.9 Miles R6 58th Street North MN 36 58th Street North and future road 0.7 Miles B1 County Road 14 & County Road 17 39th Street N & County Road 14 County Road 17 and 39th Street N 0.8 Miles B2 County Road 14 & Stillwater Way Stillwater Way & County Road 15 Stillwater Way 0.7 Miles Typical trail stop sign at road intersection. Figure 23: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Map. Section III: Development Concept 24 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE SUNFISH LAKE PARK GiWX GlWX ?ÇA@ !"b$ GnWX GsWX ?öA@ GoWX GqWX GqWX GqWX GoWX GlWX %&h( GoWX GoWX GkWX GnWX G¡WX GeWX Sf GoWX N00.25 0.50.125 Miles ?¸A@ CITY OF GRANT CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY OF PINE SPRINGS CITY OF MAHTOMEDI CITY OF STILLWATER CITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTS CITY OF BAYTOWN WEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIP CITY OF AFTON CITY OF WOODBURY CITY OF OAKDALE Horseshoe Lake Jane Lake Lake Elmo Eagle Point Lake WhiteBearLake Lake Bielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack Rd RadioDrValley Creek RdWoodburyDrWeirDr75thStN 50th St N InterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson Ave Woodlane Dr HudsonRd Saint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvd Stillwater Rd 4th St N Cour tl y Rd Ma n n i n g Ave NLakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N 34th St N GreenwayAve7th St N 15th St N County Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N 50th St N 80th St N OlsonLake Tr N20th St NKeatsAveN Commerce Dr W ild w oodR dMckusickRdN IdealAveN39thSt N ManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN 40th StNJamacaAveN ManningTrNNealAveSStillwater Blvd N StillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrB2 R1 R2 R3 R4 R5 R6 B1 R3A Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Trail Sub Segments Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH Figure 24: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R1 Section III: Development Concept 25Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Segment R1 Segment R1 measures approximately 1.1 miles long and extends from I-94 to County Road 10. This trail segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail will utilize the existing trail along the east side of County Road 19/Keats Avenue. This existing trail also connects to the existing south segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail located south of I-94. Trail Segment R1 extends through the signalized intersection at the I-94 off ramp at County Road 19/Keats Avenue. The existing trail then extends across I-94 on an eight foot wide trail. It is anticipated that the trail will be upgraded to10-feet wide at the time the I-94 bridge is reconstructed in the future. After crossing I-94, the existing trail continues through another signalized intersection at the I-94 off ramp at County Road 19/Keats Avenue. Both pedestrian walks extending through the two I-94 off ramps includes Americans with Disabilities (ADA) compliant pedestrian ramps with raised truncated domes and trail crossing push buttons. From this point north, the trail will continue on the east side of County Road 19/Keats Avenue to County Road 10 on the existing eight foot trail. The existing eight foot trail will be widened to 10 feet at a future date in conjunction with roadway improvements. 0 400 800 ftNORTH Signalized intersection Existing 8’ trail over I-94 Regional trail Segment R1 on existing local trail Regional trail Segment R2 on existing county trail Existing local trail Regional Trail Rest Stop Existing 4-way stop Lake Elmo Park Reserve Existing Central Greenway Regional Trail Existing road right-of-way Existing trail across I-94. Section III: Development Concept 26 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Segment R2 Segment R2 measures approximately 2.2 miles long and extends from County Road 10 to Lake Elmo Park Reserve Maintenance Area Access Road. The majority of Segment R2 utilizes an existing eight foot paved trail that extends through Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The existing eight foot trail will eventually be widened to at least 10 feet at a future date. The existing trail extending through the park may be widened to 12 feet to accommodate additional paved and/or gravel shoulders for pedestrians. Trail Segment R2 starts at the existing four-way stop intersection at County Road 19/Keats Avenue and continues north on the existing trail on the east side of Keats Avenue. The pedestrian ramps extending through County Road 10 includes ADA compliant pedestrian ramps with raised truncated domes. Trail Segment R2 continues on the east side of Keats Avenue until it crosses Keats Avenue to an approximately 0.25 mile long unbuilt trail segment on the west side of Keats Avenue south of the Lake Elmo Park Reserve entrance pay station. The proposed regional trail alignment crosses Keats Avenue south of the pay station rather than following the existing trail to the pay station in effort to reduce trail user conflicts with vehicles paying to enter the park. During busy days, vehicles often get backed up at the pay station and pullover/parking area on the east side of the road. The backed up vehicles create potential for trail users running into car doors as they swing open. The unbuilt trail segment on the west side of Keats Avenue south of the pay station connects to the existing trail on the west side of Keats Avenue at the pay station. Keats Avenue becomes a park access road as it moves north into Lake Elmo Park Reserve. From the pay station, the trail continues north on the existing paved trail along the Park Access Road on the west side of the road until reaching the Boat Launch Access Road. From the Boat Launch Access Road, Segment R2 will extend north, along the existing Park Maintenance Area Access Road. This part of Segment R2 will require a new paved trail. Key destinations this trail segment passes are the Eagle Point Trailhead and the Lake Elmo Nordic Center. Existing trail on east side of Keats Avenue in Lake Elmo Park Reserve.Eagle Point Trailhead parking lot. Trail crossing of Keats Avenue at Lake Elmo Park Reserve Existing trail on west side of Park Access Road in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Section III: Development Concept 27Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 25: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R2 Figure 26: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R2 Regional trail Segment R2 on existing county trail Regional trail Segment R2 on existing county trail Regional trail Segment R2 on existing soft surface trail Park Maintenance Area Access Road Regional trail Segment R3A on new paved trail Regional trail Segment R3- unbuilt Existing soft surface trails Railroad right-of-way Existing Emergency Access Road Potential trail crossing across railroad Existing road right-of-way Existing paved county trails Lake Elmo Park Reserve pay station Eagle Point Trailhead Existing soft surface trails/nordic ski trails Lake Elmo Nordic Center Regional trail Segment R1 on existing local trail Existing 4-way stop 0 0400 400800 ft 800 ftNORTHNORTH Regional trail Segment R4 - unbuilt Existing paved county trails Regional Trail Rest Stop Section III: Development Concept 28 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 27: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R3 and R3A Segment R3 Segment R3 measures approximately 1.0 miles long. The trail extends along Lake Elmo Park Reserve Emergency Access Road from the Lake Elmo Park Reserve Maintenance Area Access Road to County Road 14/Stillwater Boulevard. Trail Segment R3 continues east along the south side of Stillwater Boulevard to Stillwater Lane. Trail Segment R3 begins by extending along the west side of the Emergency Access Road until it crosses the Emergency Access Road to the east side of the road at the existing farm driveway. From the farm driveway, the trail will continue on the east side of the Emergency Access Road across the existing railroad crossing. A trail overpass could be constructed at a natural highpoint just west of the existing at-grade railroad crossing. Washington County will determine how to cross the railroad at a later date. Once across the railroad, the trail will continues east on the south side of Stillwater Boulevard in the public right-of- way. Segment R3A Segment R3A measures approximately 0.5 miles long. The trail extends along the existing soft surface trail that extends north south from the Lake Elmo Park Reserve Maintenance Area Access Road to the Union Pacific Railroad right-of-way. Near the Union Pacific Railroad and park boundary, the trail alignment extends east through the sparsely distributed coniferous trees. The trail then crosses the railroad using a trail underpass at an existing low point. The three options for crossing the railroad (at grade, overpass, or underpass) will be further evaluated during design development. Regional trail Segment R3 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R4 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R3A on existing soft surface trail Railroad right-of-way Existing Emergency Access Road Potential trail crossing across railroad Existing road right-of-way Potential trail underpass under railroad Park Maintenance Area Access Road Trail located around park maintenance facilities and nursery 0 400 800 ftNORTH Regional Trail Rest StopRegional trail Segment R2 on existing soft surface trail Existing at-grade railroad crossing in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Section III: Development Concept 29Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 28: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R4 Segment R4 Segment R4 measures approximately 1.7 miles long and extends along Stillwater Boulevard/County Road 14 from Stillwater Lane to County Road 15/Manning Avenue. Segment R4 begins by extending along the south side of Stillwater Boulevard/County Road 14 from Stillwater Lane to Lake Elmo Avenue. The trail extends through the signalized intersection at County Road 17 on the south side of Stillwater Boulevard Segment R4 will require additional design to develop a trail given the narrow right-of-way located near the farm building along County Road 14 through downtown Lake Elmo. Given the narrow right-of-way, one design option may be to locate the trail directly adjacent to the roadway with a physical separation from the travel lane, such as a curb or jersey barrier. The Lake Elmo Library should be identified with signage from the trail to alert trail users to its location, two blocks south of Stillwater Boulevard. Regional trail Segment R3 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R3A - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R4 - unbuilt Interim regional trail Segment B1 - unbuilt Regional Trailhead at Lake Elmo Elementary School/Lake Elmo City Hall Narrow right-of-way Railroad right-of-way Signalized intersection Lake Elmo Library 0 400 800 ftNORTH Signalized intersection at County Road 14 and County Road 17. Narrow right-of-way along County Road 14 near existing farm building. Section III: Development Concept 30 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 29: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R4 and B1 Segment R4 Trail Segment R4 continues east along the south side of Stillwater Boulevard from County Road 17. Trail Segment R4 crosses Stillwater Boulevard to the north side at the signalized intersection at Lake Elmo Avenue. The existing pedestrian facilities at Lake Elmo Avenue have push button signals and truncated domes. From Lake Elmo Avenue, trail Segment R4 continues along the north side of Stillwater Boulevard/ County Road 14 through downtown Lake Elmo to the recently constructed trail along the north/east side of Stillwater Boulevard extending from 39th Street to Stillwater Way. From Stillwater Way, trail Segment R4 continues east on the unbuilt trail segment along the recently realigned County Road 14 to the signalized intersection at County Road 15. Segment B1 Building a trail through downtown Lake Elmo will require adjusting the road geometry and potential acquisition of additional right-of-way. Construction of a trail though downtown Lake Elmo will likely not occur until Stillwater Regional trail Segment R4 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R4 on existing local trail Interim regional trail Segment B1 - unbuilt Lake Elmo Elementary Signalized intersection Lake Elmo City Hall Existing local trail Interim regional trail Segment B1 on existing local trail Interim regional trail Segment B2 on existing local trail Narrow right-of-way Railroad right-of-way Lake Elmo Park Lake Elmo VFW Baseball Field 0 400 800 ftNORTH Regional Trailhead at Lake Elmo Elementary School/Lake Elmo City Hall Existing interim trail alignment along 39th Street. Narrow right-of-way through downtown Lake Elmo. Section III: Development Concept 31Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 30: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 and B2 Boulevard/County Road 14 is widened by the County. Given the unknown timeframe before a trail through downtown Lake Elmo can be built, an interim trail alignment is proposed that wraps around downtown Lake Elmo. Segment B1, the interim alignment around downtown Lake Elmo, measures approximately 0.8 miles long. The interim trail segment extends north south along Lake Elmo Avenue / County Road 17 from Stillwater Boulevard to the existing trail along 39th Street. The interim trail alignment continues by extending along the existing 39th Street trail to the recently constructed trail along Stillwater Boulevard. The unbuilt trail segment along County Road 17 will likely be constructed when the adjacent farmland is developed. Segment B2 Trail Segment B2 extends approximately 0.7 miles along the existing trail on the north side of Stillwater Way from County Road 14 to County Road 15. Trail Segment B2 serves as an interim trail alignment for the unbuilt trail segment of Segment R4 extending along County Road 14 between Stillwater Way and County Road 15. This unbuilt trail segment of Segment R4 extends along the recently constructed roadway and thus may not be reconstructed for some time. Segment R5 Segment R5 measures approximately 1.9 miles long and extends along the west side of County Road 15/Stillwater Boulevard from County Road 14 to 58th Street. Segment R5 extends along the eight foot wide trail recently constructed in conjunction with the roadway realignment project of County Road 15 and 14. The existing trail segment extends along County Road 15 between the signalized intersection located at County Road 14 and the signalized intersection at Stillwater Way. The trail will eventually be widened to preferred regional trail width of 10 feet wide. The remaining unbuilt portion of trail Segment R5 continues on the east side County Road 15/Stillwater Boulevard to 58th Street. Regional trail Segment R4 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R5 on existing local trail Washington County Fairgrounds Regional trail Segment R5 - unbuilt Signalized intersection Existing local trail Interim regional trail Segment B2 on existing local trail 0 400 800 ftNORTH Section III: Development Concept 32 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 31: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 Segment R5 continues along the west side of County Road 15/Stillwater Boulevard. Few obstacles exist to construct the unbuilt portion of Segment R5. The trail segment along County Road 15 has adequate right-of-way to construct the trail without additional acquisition. Furthermore, the majority of the overhead utilities are located on the east side of County Road 15 reducing the likelihood of costs associated with relocating utilities. There are two signalized intersections along Segment R5. The first signalized intersection is located at 50th Street. This signalized intersection is furnished with truncated domes and pedestrian push buttons. The second signalized intersection is located at 58th Street. This intersection lacks truncated domes and has outdated pedestrian push buttons. In addition to updating pedestrian ramps and signals to meet current ADA design standards, a trail overpass is proposed at 58th Street to provide a safe crossing from the regional trail to Stillwater High School. Segment R5 also features a proposed rest stop near an existing bus stop located at Linden Trail. This trail rest stop was selected to provide trail users who chose to use the trail to access the MetroTransit bus stop a space to park their bicycle. Several other bus stops are located throughout Segment R5 including near the proposed trailhead at Stillwater High School. Signalized intersection Existing local trail Regional Trail Rest Stop Regional trail Segment R5 - unbuilt Existing road right-of-way Interim regional trail Segment B2 on existing local trail Washington County Fairgrounds 0 400 800 ftNORTH Section III: Development Concept 33Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 32: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 Signalized intersection Potential grade separated crossing to high school Regional Trailhead at Stillwater High School Existing local trail Regional trail Segment R5 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R6 - unbuilt Existing road right-of-way Stillwater High School 0 400 800 ftNORTH Signalized intersection at County Road 15 and 50th Street. Typical road section of County Road 15 looking south.Signalized intersection at County Road 15 and 58th Street. Section III: Development Concept 34 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Figure 33: Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment R5 Segment R6 Segment R6 measures approximately 0.7 miles long and extends from County Road 15 to County Road 15 and MN 36. Trail Segment R6 may extend along 58th Street and the proposed frontage road alignment developed as part of the Manning and 36 Interchange Study currently being conducted by Washington County. A small existing trail segment exists along 58th Street along the gas station property near County Road 15 and 58th Street. However, this small existing segment may not be incorporated into the regional trail system if the Manning and MN 36 Interchange Study designates the trail on the other side of the road or along a different alignment. This study will help determine the road and trail network alternations that will be needed as part of any interchange project. Washington County Engineering Division is coordinating with the Parks Division to ensure the trail connection will be up to the regional standard. Existing local trail Regional trail Segment R5 - unbuilt Regional trail Segment R6 - unbuiltManning and MN 36 interchange frontage road. Location TBD Existing road right-of-way Stillwater High School 0 400 800 ftNORTH Existing Manning and MN 36 intersection. Existing Trail along 58th Street near gas station. Section III: Development Concept 35Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 IMPLEMENTATION It is anticipated that the regional trail will be implemented in stages, with the construction of various stages driven by available funding and local factors, such as timing of adjacent roadway improvements, and public desire to expand the regional trail system. Until the corridor is fully developed, gaps in the regional trail will exist. However, the ultimate trail geometry will consist of a 10-foot-wide (minimum) paved surface, separate from any adjacent roadway, so that trail users will not share the roadway with motorized vehicles. The development and implementation of unconstructed trail segments and upgrading of certain trail segments to regional trail standards will require additional activities beyond the master plan amendment phase. These activities typically include the preparation of final construction documents, additional property and natural resource analysis, final cost estimates, city staff review, trail-way cooperative agreements, and public approval meetings (such as City Council and Park Commission and County Board meetings). ESTIMATED COSTS Regional trail implementation has both initial costs (acquisition and development) and on-going costs (operations and maintenance). Trail development will occur as opportunities to coordinate with other agencies/projects occur, funding becomes available, and at the discretion of the Washington County Board of Commissioners. Individual development projects may move ahead of schedule to coincide with development adjacent to the trail corridor that can result in cost savings. Development Costs Regional trail development includes the cost to prepare the site; reconfigure roadways as required; modify drainage patterns where necessary; pave the trail; and install signage, striping, and landscaping. In total, the estimated development cost for the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail is $6,873,359. See Appendix A. Detailed Cost Estimate for further information. Section IV: Conflicts and Coordination with Adjacent Public Services 36 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank Section IV: Conflicts and Coordination with Adjacent Public Services 37Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION IV: CONFLICTS AND COORDINATION WITH ADJACENT PUBLIC SERVICES The Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail is proposed to be developed within public right-of-way. Additional right-of-way may be needed to develop some segments of the trail along County Road 14. Final determination of right-of-way needs will be identified when trails are proposed, which may coincide with road widening projects or adjacent property development. The total estimated cost of additional right-of-way is $1,417,000 in 2018 dollars. There are buried utilities, including gas and sanitary sewer in the right-of-way along portions of the regional trail. High- voltage overhead power are located near the location of the new frontage road being designed as part of the Manning and MN 36 interchange project. Coordination with utilities will be required during design development to ensure that the trail is constructed without imposing on utility easements or otherwise impacting the utility corridors. Existing High-voltage overhead power lines near proposed frontage road of Manning and MN 36. Section V: Operations and Maintenance 38 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank Section V: Operations and Maintenance 39Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION V: OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE Washington County manages and operates its park and trail system with internal staff including seasonal and full-time employees. The Parks Division has an annual operations and maintenance budget of approximately $4,000,000 to operate and maintain the County’s park and trail system. The Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment will be overseen by professional public safety, operations and maintenance staff operating out of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. This trail will add new mileage to the Washington County’s regional trail system and operations and maintenance costs will increase because of the expansion of the system. Additional staff time and equipment will be needed to maintain the new trail segments. No new equipment will be needed as the County will utilize existing trucks and mowers to maintain the trail. It is anticipated that the annual cost to maintain the trail upon full build out will be $5,500, including additional staff and time and resources. An additional $10,000 annually will be needed for the five years prairie maintenance plan to establish the prairie and pollinator plantings along the trail, as proposed in the natural resources section of the master plan amendment. PROPOSED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES Washington County, through joint powers agreements with the City of Lake Elmo and relevant public jurisdictions, will provide maintenance services for the regional trail. Maintenance operations will include seasonal condition assessments and periodic inspections, followed by necessary maintenance actions. Inspections will address possible safety issues, vandalism, and non-routine maintenance concerns. Washington County will also respond to maintenance issues identified by the public, on a timely basis, as funding permits. Extraordinary maintenance may be required to respond to storm damage, vandalism and other unplanned circumstances. The Central Greenway Regional Trail will receive scheduled seal coating and reconstruction in accordance with Washington County standards, and as funding permits. Mowing turf trail shoulders.Regular trail maintenance including pavement repair will be scheduled by Washington County to keep the trail functional and operational. Section V: Operations and Maintenance 40 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Washington County will provide routine maintenance as identified below. »Sign inventory and replacement, spring cleanup, trail sweeping, trash pickup, erosion repair, fence repair, bituminous patching, and striping replacement, as needed. »Mowing adjacent to the trails will be coordinated by Washington County. »Washington County will coordinate snow removal maintenance with the city of Lake Elmo. PUBLIC SAFETY Washington County Sheriff’s Office will provide public safety services on Central Greenway Regional Trail. SOURCES OF REVENUE Washington County budgets annually for operating the park and trail system. The budget includes maintenance of recreation facilities and management of natural resources within the parks. Revenue for these expenditures originates from three primary sources: »Vehicle passes and campground reservations at County parks »County levy »Operations and maintenance grants consisting of State general funds and lottery in-lieu sales tax funds that are disbursed through the Metropolitan Council »State and Metropolitan Council Bonding »Parks and Trails Legacy Fund Grants Washington County does not charge for trail use. ORDINANCES Washington County has adopted Ordinance No. 174 which establishes rules and regulations for park and trail use and management under its jurisdiction. The ordinance incorporates Minnesota statutes that address regulations for: »Public Use »General Conduct »General Parkland Operation »Protection of Property, Structures and Natural Resources »Recreational Activities »Motorized Vehicles, Traffic and Parking A copy of the ordinance is available for review through Washington County. Rules and regulations are posted, as needed, throughout Washington County park properties and facilities. Posted information includes park hours, permitted and prohibited activities, fees, map of the parks and trails, and who to contact in case of an emergency. Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 41Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION VI: PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT AND PARTICIPATION OVERVIEW Washington County strives to provide an inclusive public engagement process for its trail planning efforts. To reach a diverse cross-section of the community and to engage people of diverse races, ethnicities, classes, ages, abilities and national origin, Washington County staff developed a plan to provide information to the public in multiple ways with an emphasis on trying to make it easy and accessible for all interested citizens to participate in the planning process. The public engagement process included the following meeting types. »Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) »Community Advisory Committee (CAC) »Pop-up Events »Public Open Houses »One-on-one listening sessions »Wikimapping website »Updates to the Washington County Parks Commission on the plan development progress »Presentation to County Board, Lake Elmo Parks Commission, and Lake Elmo City Council The general public, including park and trail users and Washington County residents are important stakeholders in the master planning process and their input is highly valued. Comments received have been addressed in revisions to the master plan amendment. REGIONAL TRAIL PLANNING Planning for the Central Greenway Regional Trail is in response to expressed demand for recreational and non-motorized transportation options in suburban edge communities. The Central Greenway Regional Trail is identified as a Regional Trail Search Corridor in the Metropolitan Council 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan. As such, the Central Greenway Regional Trail needs an approved master plan amendment to become eligible for Metropolitan Council regional parks system funding for development. CENTRAL GREENWAY REGIONAL TRAIL TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE A Central Greenway Regional Trail Technical Advisory Committee (TAC) and Community Advisory Committee (CAC) were established to guide the trail master plan amendment and coordinated planning efforts within the local communities and greater region. Members of the TAC included public agency staff from the following stakeholders: City of Lake Elmo, Lake Elmo Park Reserve, City of Stillwater, Valley Branch Watershed Organization, Metropolitan Council, Brown’s Creek Watershed. Members of the CAC included community stakeholders from the City of Lake Elmo, City of West Lakeland Township, Lakeview Hospital, Stillwater High School Bike Team, ISD #384, Parks and Open Space Commission, Washington County, and community advocates. The responsibilities of the TAC and CAC included: »Coordinating with respective groups and governing bodies, such as City Councils, Planning Commissions, Park Commissions and other staff/departments within the respective city/agency. »Assisting in implementing public participation opportunities. »Providing information and support necessary to identify feasible trail routes and review/complete the trail master plan amendment that meets city and applicable agency goals. »Assisting Washington County in local municipality/agency approval processes. Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 42 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 The TAC met three times: »February 13, 2018 »June 16, 2018 »October 1, 2018 The CAC also met three times: »March 8, 2018 »June 21, 2018 »October 4, 2018 Throughout the master planning process, Washington County staff met with TAC and CAC members to identify opportunities and address and resolve their issues and concerns. These meetings often involved other individuals, groups, and organizations as detailed route information was exchanged. WASHINGTON COUNTY PARK COMMISSION The Washington County Park Commission reviewed planning updates and the final draft master plan amendment two times throughout the planning process, including: »July 12, 2018 »November 15, 2018 ONE-ON-ONE LISTENING SESSIONS Washington County staff presented updates on the master plan amendment process to local city planners and Lake Elmo Park Reserve staff several times throughout the master plan amendment process to keep local authorities updated and to solicit additional input about the master plan amendment. Meetings were held on the following dates: »Lake Elmo Park Reserve staff meeting - May 2, 2018 »City of Lake Elmo staff - May 23, 2018 Washington County staff also met with local businesses and community groups in Lake Elmo. For example, Washington County reached out to STAR Snowmobile Club, FamilyMeans, Lake Elmo Inn, and Common Ground Church on several occasions to share project information and to invite them (and their partners/members) to the master plan public engagement events. It was identified early in the planning process that contacting these groups directly would be an effective way to engage with them. Comments from these groups were captured in engagement event comment/question tables. PUBLIC COMMUNICATIONS/ SOCIAL MEDIA Online and social media tools were identified as alternative ways to get information and updates to the public. The Washington County website was the primary on-line portal for meeting information and for posting draft plans for public review. All open houses and pop-up meetings were listed on the County’s website. The County utilized its Facebook and Twitter accounts to promote the pop-up events. In addition, fliers were printed and posted at County facilities, libraries, coffee shops, post Open house 2 flier CENTRAL GREENWAY REGIONAL TRAIL LAKE ELMO SEGMENT MASTER PLAN OPEN HOUSE 10.30.18 5 - 7PM AT STILLWATER AREA HIGH SCHOOL CAFETERIA Come review the preferred multi-use trail route and provide feedback on the design and facilities. Refreshments will be provided and attendees can come and go as they please. More information can be found by searching “Central Greenway” at: www.co.washington.mn.us Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 43Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 offices, parks, city halls, and schools to promote the pop-up events and open houses. A WikiMap site was developed for the master plan amendment to provide the public an opportunity to provide input on the regional trail alignment without attending a public engagement meeting in person. A total of 6 comments were received. These comments are included in “Appendix E: WikiMap Results” on page 77 PUBLIC OPEN HOUSES Washington County, with the support and assistance of select Technical Advisory Committee members presented the Central Greenway Regional Trail planning efforts and held two public open house engagement events where the public had an opportunity to review the status of planning efforts and provide comments. In an effort to reach out to a variety of Washington County residents, Washington County held meetings at public buildings accessible to the public. Washington County also sent out press releases to advertise each open house, and stories were posted in local newspapers. Public open house meetings were held on the following dates: »August 28, 2018 Open House at Lake Elmo Christ Lutheran Church »October 30, 2018 Open House at the Stillwater High School cafeteria Open House #1 Approach & Findings The first public open house was held on August 28, 2018 at Lake Elmo Christ Lutheran Church. Lake Elmo Lutheran Church is located near the proposed trail corridor in downtown Lake Open house 1 at Lake Elmo Christ Lutheran Church. Central Greenway Regional Trail WikiMap Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 44 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Elmo. The church is easily accessible to the public with ample parking. Attendance at the open house included 32 members of the public and representatives from Washington County. Several proposed alternate trail alignments with detailed analysis for each alternate alignment were presented at the meeting. Feedback from the first open house was positive with interest in developing a linking regional trail along through downtown Lake Elmo with connections to Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Specific comments from the open house are listed in Figure 34. Open House #2 Approach & Findings A second open house was held on October 30, 2018 at the Stillwater High School cafeteria. Attendance at the open house included 25 members of the public and representatives from Washington County. The preferred trail alignment developed based on comments received from previous public engagement was presented at the second open house. Those in attendance provided valuable input on the proposed preferred alignment. Overall, positive feedback was given about the proposed regional trail. A complete list of comments from the public meetings is included in Figure 34. POP-UP MEETINGS Washington County also initiated two public pop-up events to seek more public input about the master plan amendment update. The 2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan requires that the public engagement process seek to mitigate existing racial, ethnic, cultural, or linguistic barriers and include people of diverse races, ethnicities, classes, ages, abilities and national origin. In order to reach out to populations that may not feel comfortable attending open houses or public meetings, the County set up two pop-up events designed to “meet people where they are already located.” Staff set up tables at strategic locations and times that are frequented by Washington County residents of all backgrounds. Pop-up style tabling allowed for more in-depth, one-on-one conversations. The County received positive feedback on conducting this type of engagement, as several members of the public mentioned they would not typically attend an open house, but were happy they were given the opportunity to provide feedback in this setting. The pop-up meetings were held on the following dates: »February 26, 2018 Lake Elmo Nordic Center »August 8, 2018 Washington County Fair Pop-Up Event #1 Approach & Findings In an effort to obtain more input from the public about the Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment, Washington County held two pop-up meetings. The first pop- up event was held at the Lake Elmo Nordic Center on February 26, 2018. 28 people provided input during the pop-up event. This pop-up event was strategically located here because this is a popular destination for many community members who actively invest in active living and would be potential trail users. The Lake Elmo Nordic Center is also located adjacent to the trail corridor. Positive feedback was received with many desiring the trail to connect to downtown Lake Elmo while not disrupting the cross country ski trails located in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Open house 2 at Stillwater High School cafeteria. Pop-up meeting at Lake Elmo Nordic Center. Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 45Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 A complete list of comments from this pop-up meeting is included in Figure 34. Pop-up Event #2 Approach & Findings The second pop-up event was held at the Washington County Fair Grounds on August 8, 2018. The event was held in the Washington County booth during the afternoon to provide an alternative to evening meeting times. In addition, the fairgrounds is located adjacent to the preferred trail corridor. Forty people stopped by the pop-up event to provide comments and/or ask questions about the trail master plan amendment. A board with site issues and opportunities as well as a board of the different trail alternates was presented at the open house. Many people who stopped by were excited to see more trails in Lake Elmo and Washington County. A complete list of comments from the public meetings is included in Figure 34. COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT RESULTS The various meetings and public outreach events that were conducted as part of the Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment process provided the project team with beneficial input about what the public wants for the Lake Elmo Segment of the Central Greenway Regional Trail. The comments received in the community engagement process supported the County’s sentiment to expand the regional trail system and develop the trail in a safe and thoughtful way. Several themes and ideas came out during the public process. These included: »The regional trail should connect to Lake Elmo Park Reserve, downtown Lake Elmo, and Stillwater High School. »Avoid impacts to other existing recreation uses. In particular, the ones found in Lake Elmo Park Reserve. »Additional local trail connections should be a priority. »Provide safe route with least amount of driveway crossings, utility poles, etc. »Minimize adjacent property impacts. »Provide preferred trail route that is politically palatable. SUMMARY OF PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT COMMENTS The following table summarizes the comments that were received at the open houses and pop-up meetings throughout the master planning process. Several of the comments were repeated at multiple events but are listed only once for clarity. Open House Meeting #1 Public Comment/Question Response The blue segment located on the existing soft surface trail through Lake Elmo Park Reserve is a popular mountain biking trail.The preferred route did not interfere with mountain bike trails. I have a concern with a parking lot near the future west side Lake Elmo Park Reserve entrance. The high speeds at this location along Inwood Ave is a concern if traffic will be turning into the proposed west park parking lot. Lower speed or keep park access in its present location (cur- rent unofficial entrance closer to 26 Street N.) The Lake Elmo Park Reserve west entrance design is outside the scope of this master plan amendment. Like red route through Lake Elmo Park Reserve but I am concerned because it is a highly-used trail for walkers. The plan addressed this comment by proposing a wider trail through the park that will include additional space for walkers. Add winter maintenance to provide bike/pedestrian access through Lake Elmo Park Reserve. Winter maintenance will be covered in the master plan amend- ment. I like the red and orange options because they are most direct.The plan addresses this comment. Klondike Avenue is an unsafe trail route. The road is gravel with tight curves and steep grades. There is also a 30 foot drop to a pond. The plan addresses this comment. Trails in the Kindred development are private.The plan addresses this comment. A safer crossing is needed at County Roads 14 at Lake Elmo Avenue.The plan addresses this comment. The Lake Elmo Elementary school needs a parking lot and their play- ground restored to accommodate more students. Roadway speeds on Lake Elmo Ave should be reduced for safety. Improvements to Lake Elmo Elementary school are outside the scope of this master plan amendment. I like the Lake Elmo Ave/CR17 to 50th street because it has less traffic and more scenic than following Lake Elmo Ave to MN 36.The plan addresses this comment. Lake Elmo Avenue/CR 17 and MN 36 is a dangerous intersection.Intersection improvements to CR17 and MN 36 are outside the scope of this master plan amendment. Comment received along Stillwater Blvd at Linden Trail: Concerned that this is turning into a very high traffic noisy route. What will be a safe crossing? The plan addresses this comment. Figure 34: Summary of public comments and responses Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 46 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 47Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Open House Meeting #2 Public Comment/Question Response The trail alignment proposed is the best option.The plan addresses this comment. I like the idea of a trail underpass of the railroad tracks north of Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The method used to cross the railroad will be determined during design development. The local trail northwest of the new CR 14 and CR 15 intersection should be made the regional trail because people will cut through on the shorter route. The plan addresses this comment. The preferred regional trail route will allow direct access to the Washing- ton County Fair.The plan addresses this comment. Add trailheads in downtown Lake Elmo and Lake Elmo Park Reserve.The plan addresses this comment. Can a connection be made to Sunfish Lake Park? A connection to Sunfish Lake Park would likely require a grade separated crossing across CR 14 and is outside the scope of this master plan amendment because the regional trail cannot go on the north side of CR 14 without lake impacts to Sunfish Lake given the proximity CR 14. Liked the idea of an grade separated crossing of CR 15 at Lake Elmo High School.The plan addresses this comment. Lake Elmo Park Reserve has intense use. Overuse will degrade the park experience. The alignment should be on county roads, not through the middle of the park reserve. The trail through the park primarily utilizes existing paved trails. Any development of new trail or upgrades to existing trails will utilize sustainable design practices. Trails in the park reserve should follow existing roads and not be devel- oped on soft-surface trails.The plan addresses this comment. There was support for the trail extending through downtown Lake Elmo along CR 14.The plan addresses this comment. Provide park access in the southeast corner along Lake Elmo Avenue.The preferred trail alignment did no provide access in the southeast corner along Lake Elmo Avenue. More local trails will be needed to connect to the proposed regional trail. Especially along Lake Elmo Avenue. Development of local trails is outside the scope of this master plan amendment. Concern was expressed for the amount of separation between high- speed traffic on CR 14 and the adjacent proposed trail.The plan addresses this comment. Plant materials that are planted next to roadways need to be salt toler- ant. Most grasses will not survive.Specific plant species will be selected during design development. Create a “greenway” experience.The plan addresses this comment. User fees and enforcement were suggested.Washington County currently does not charge for regional trail use. Create a safe crossing to the Lake Elmo Elementary School.The plan addresses this comment. There will be a future fire department constructed along 39th Street east of Lake Elmo Avenue.The plan addresses this comment. Add snowmobile crossing signs where the Star Trail will cross the pro- posed trail.The plan addresses this comment. Install a box culvert under Highway 36 at Manning.A interchange study is currently being conducted by the county. Will snowmobiles be able to use the trail crossing of Highway 36?A interchange study is currently being conducted by the county. Develop a trailhead similar to Pine Point Regional Park.The plan addresses this comment. The cost of construction and maintenance are always a concern.The plan addresses this comment. “Figure 34: Summary of public comments and responses” Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 48 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 “Figure 34: Summary of public comments and responses” (From Open House #2) Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 49Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Pop-up Meeting #1 Public Comment/Question Response A comment was made that the user wanted the trail to connect to the park because they trailer camp in the park and would like the opportuni- ty to bike to downtown Lake Elmo. The plan addresses this comment. The trail should connect or pass through downtown Lake Elmo.The plan addresses this comment. The trail should connect with the Gateway State Trail.This is out of the scope of this project and will be addressed in a future phase of trail planning Cross-country ski trails should not be changed or impacted by adding a paved trail through the park.The plan addresses this comment. Add a west entrance to the park for pedestrians and bikes.Lake Elmo Park Reserve has plans to develop a west entrance Provide a safe crossing of CR-14 and the railroad.The plan addresses this comment. Establish better access to recreation areas of Lake Elmo Park Reserve.The plan addresses this comment. Connect with the trails in Sunfish Lake Park, but not to cut through the park.The regional trail will not connect to Sunfish Lake Park. Connect to Baytown Township.The plan addresses this comment. Avoid CR-17 south of CR-14.The plan addresses this comment. Several comments indicated a preference for a north entrance at Lake Elmo Park Reserve to provide bike and pedestrian access.The plan addresses this comment. Connect with single track mountain bike trails within Lake Elmo Park Reserve.The plan addresses this comment. Pop-up Meeting #2 Public Comment/Question Response More trails in Lake Elmo will be nice. Many people commented on how they like and support the trail.The plan addresses this comment. Trail loops are preferred over out and back trails. The regional trail will be a linear corridor but several existing local trails that connect to the Central Greenway will provide opportuni- ties for looped routes. Find ways to connect the regional trail to restaurant and bars so trail users have a destination to travel to.The plan addresses this comment. Extend the trail straight through the Lake Elmo Park Reserve on the existing paved trail to reduce the conflicts fast moving cyclist might have with other park uses. The plan addresses this comment. Leave unpaved trails in Lake Elmo Park Reserve as is.The plan addresses this comment. People love biking in Lake Elmo Park Reserve.The plan addresses this comment. The dark blue (far west) route through Lake Elmo Park Reserve is better because it offers a longer trail through the scenic park.This route was not selected as the preferred route. The orange route (far east) route through Lake Elmo Park Reserve is best because it would be very scenic by the lake and hillier for roller ski train- ing. More people would use a trail that is near water. This route was not selected as the preferred route. No strong opinion on any of the options. They all look good.The plan addresses this comment. “Figure 34: Summary of public comments and responses” Page Intentionally Blank Section VI: Public Engagement and Participation 50 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Section VII: Public Awareness 51Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION VII: PUBLIC AWARENESS Washington County uses public relations, marketing, and media relations tools, such as a website, event planning, press releases, and promotional materials to promote their parks and trails. Washington County also collaborates with a wide array of community, business, and government organizations to promote their facilities, programs, and services and to educate the public about the available resources. Washington County Parks engages the public through several on-line and social media tools. The County website has a page dedicated to parks and trails that provides information on the parks and trails across the county, lists information about programs and events, explains how individuals can support the park system by donating or volunteering, and provides information and a link for reservations and permits. Washington County actively posts information on Twitter and Facebook to share news and information about the park system. Opportunities for expanding social media and on-line resources for public awareness will likely expand in the future as new media tools and new platforms become available. Younger park users frequently access public service information on-line and will continue to seek additional ways to engage with the County about the park system through social media. Washington County Parks Twitter page. Washington County Parks Facebook page. Page Intentionally Blank Section VII: Public Awareness 52 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 SECTION VIII: ACCESSIBILITY Washington County is committed to providing access and recreational opportunities to all people, including persons with disabilities, minorities, and other special-population groups. Washington County meets this commitment through appropriate facility design and programming considerations and by actively addressing potential barriers to participation. All regional trail facilities described in the master plan amendment will be developed in accordance with Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) standards and guidelines. More specifically, the Central Greenway Regional Trail will adhere to the Minnesota Bikeway Facility Design Manual (MnDOT 2007); Trail Planning, Design and Development Guidelines (MnDNR 2007); Designing Sidewalks and Trails for Access, Part I and II: Best Practices Design Guide (FHWA); ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Outdoor Developed Areas (United States Access Board); and ADA Accessibility Guidelines for Buildings and Facilities (U.S. Access Board) unless more current guidelines and standards exist at the time of development. All unconstructed segments and those associated with regional trail reconstruction, associated trailheads and trail amenities, such as rest stops, parking, rest rooms and water access, will be designed to accommodate individuals with disabilities. In addition, the paved trail will safely accommodate two-way directional non-motor vehicle traffic and incorporate periodic rest stops to provide users an opportunity to rest, overlook the natural environment, and comfortably interact with other trail users. Compliance with ADA standards is an important goal of trail design. Routing the trail within existing street right-of-way makes it a challenge to fully comply with ADA standards in certain areas. Washington County and local municipalities have made every attempt to identify a trail route that minimizes these occurrences. Parking is available at existing local parks, shopping centers, and regional parks on and along the trail. Regional and community parks function as trailheads for the proposed trail in addition to other identified key orientation points along the trail. Crossing major roadways is necessary because the trail passes through fully developed urban areas. Washington County will investigate opportunities to coordinate grade-separated pedestrian crossings with appropriate agencies, modify, or add traffic signal timing, crosswalks and signage to ensure the trail meets all relevant design guidelines. The trail has also been planned to provide access to important local community destinations such as parks, commercial areas, community facilities, and transit facilities. The regional trail passes through a variety of neighborhoods with varying demographics, providing access to people with a wide range of social and cultural backgrounds. On a broader scale, the Central Greenway Regional Trail provides direct access to the metropolitan regional trail system for an area currently under served by regional trails. Communities adjacent to the trail will not only have access to the Central Greenway Regional Trail, but also gain direct access to three existing regional parks/park reserves. Local trail connections are anticipated at regular intervals along the trail to further increase access to neighboring communities. AFFORDABILITY Trails are free to use in Washington County, providing a recreational opportunity to residents of all income levels. The Central Greenway Regional Trail will also provide access to the Lake Elmo Park Reserve without purchase of a parking pass. Park access fees are not charged for patrons who walk or bicycle into parks. Trail users who access Washington County parks will have access to free programming for park users including campfire talks, fitness hikes, bird walks and other programs coordinated with free Tuesdays. The Washington County Parks Division and Community Services is working to provide free park permits to individuals who receive financial assistance from the County. Section VII: Public Awareness 53Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank Section VII: Public Awareness 54 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 55Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 REFERENCES »Metropolitan Council, “2017 Regional Parks System Annual Use Estimate,” Metropolitan Council, July 2018. »Metropolitan Council, “2040 Regional Parks Policy Plan,” Metropolitan Council, February 11, 2015. »Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, “Minnesota’s State Comprehensive Outdoor Recreation Plan 2014- 2018”. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Street. Paul, MN 2014. »Health and obesity data retrieved from Minnesota Department of Health website: https://apps.health.state. mn.us/mndata/obesity_basic#byage. Page Intentionally Blank 56 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX A: RESOLUTIONS OF SUPPORT 57Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 58 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 59Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Updated: April 2018 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2019-016 DATE February 19, 2019 DEPARTMENT Public Works MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Kriesel SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER Miron CENTRAL GREENWAY REGIONAL TRAIL - LAKE ELMO SEGMENT MASTER PLAN AMENDMENT WHEREAS, a regional trail master plan is required to address the criteria set forth in the Metropolitan Council's 2040 Regional Park Policy Plan for regional linking trails and to become eligible for Metropolitan Council regional system designation and funding; and WHEREAS, the proposed Central Greenway Regional Trail will eventually connect Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park, Lake Elmo Park Reserve, and Big Marine Park Reserve; the Lake Elmo Segment of which goes between Interstate 94 and Trunk Highway (TH) 36; and WHEREAS, the Washington County Board of Commissioners provided a resolution of support for the Central Greenway Regional Trail – south segment master plan on June 26, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council provided a resolution of support for the Central Greenway Regional Trail – south segment master plan on September 27, 2017; and WHEREAS, the master planning process for the Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment included public engagement events and meetings that provided the opportunity for input from partner agencies and public stakeholders; and WHEREAS, the draft Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment master plan amendment was reviewed by the Washington County Park and Open Space Commission (POSC) on December 14, 2018; and WHEREAS, the draft Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment master plan amendment was reviewed by the Lake Elmo City Council on January 8, 2019; and WHEREAS, the Washington County Board of Commissioners heard a staff presentation on the Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment master plan amendment on February 12, 2019. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Washington County Board of Commissioners supports the Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment master plan amendment. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Central Greenway Regional Trail – Lake Elmo segment master plan amendment be submitted to the Metropolitan Council for review and approval without further action by the County Board. ATTEST: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR COUNTY BOARD CHAIR MIRON KARWOSKI KRIESEL JOHNSON WEIK YES X___ X X X X NO ____ Page Intentionally Blank 60 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX B: TRAIL PLANS 61Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank 62 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 63Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVESUNFISH LAKE PARKDOWNTOWN LAKE ELMOLAKE ELMO PUBLIC LIBRARYGiWXGlWX?ÇA@!"b$GnWXGsWX?öA@GoWXGqWXGqWXGqWXGoWXGlWX%&h(GoWXGoWXGkWXGnWXG¡WXGeWXSfN00.250.50.125Miles?¸A@CITY OF GRANTCITY OF LAKE ELMOCITY OF PINE SPRINGSCITY OF MAHTOMEDICITY OF STILLWATERCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTSBAYTOWN TOWNSHIPWEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIPCITY OF AFTONCITY OF WOODBURYCITY OF OAKDALEHorseshoe LakeJane LakeLake ElmoWhiteBearLakeLakeBielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrRadioDrValley Creek RdWoodbury D r WeirDr75thStN50th St N62nd St NInterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson AveWoodlan e D rHudsonRdSaint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvdStillwater Rd4th St NCourtlyRdM a n n in g A v e N LakeElmoAveNMahtomediAveHiltonTr30th St N34th St NGreenwayAve7th St N15th St NCounty Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N80th St NOls o n L a keTrN 20th St NKeatsAveNCommerceDrWildwoodRdMckusickRdNIdealAveN39thStNManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN40thStNJamacaAveNManningTrNNealAveSStillwaterBlvdNTamarack Rd50th St NSnowmobile TrailsExisting Public Trails (6-10’ wide)Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide )Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide)Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide)Gateway State Trail (10’ wide)Outdoor Heritage Fund Work AreaRusty Patch Bumble Bee HabitatCounty ParksCity ParksPublic DestinationsSchoolFormer Railroad CrossingAt-Grade Railroad Crossing Grade Separated Railroad Crossing Future County Road ProjectsFuture County Road Intersection ProjectsEnd of Central Greenway Regional Trail Phase 1. Start of Phase 2: Lake Elmo SegmentProposed signal at CR 19 & Hudson BlvdNew pedestrian bridge planned for 2019 constructionNarrow sidewalk crossing 94 to remainCSAH 15 & CSAH 14 IntersectionLake Elmo Park Reserve west side accessPark entranceNarrow R.O.W.Potential R.O.W. impactsNarrow R.O.W.CSAH 15 & TH 36 Interchange (2021)2020 road widening project (4 to 6 lanes) NORTH00.250.5 miCentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan: Lake Elmo SegmentOctober 30, 2018ISSUES AND OPPORTUNITIES Page Intentionally Blank 64 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 65Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 DOWNTOWN LAKE ELMOLAKE ELMO PUBLIC LIBRARYLAKE ELMO PARK RESERVESUNFISH LAKE PARKGiWXGlWX?ÇA@!"b$GnWXGsWX?öA@GoWXGqWXGqWXGqWXGoWXGlWX%&h(GoWXGoWXGkWXGnWXG¡WXGeWXSfN00.250.50.125Miles?¸A@CITY OF GRANTCITY OF LAKE ELMOCITY OF PINE SPRINGSCITY OF MAHTOMEDICITY OF STILLWATERCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTSCITY OF BAYTOWNWEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIPCITY OF AFTONCITY OF WOODBURYCITY OF OAKDALEHorseshoe LakeJane LakeLake ElmoWhiteBearLakeLakeBielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack RdRadioDrValley Creek RdWoodbury D r WeirDr75thStN50th St N62nd St NInterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson AveWoodlan e D rHudsonRdSaint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvdStillwater Rd4th St NCourtlyRdM a n n in g A v e N LakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N34th St NGreenwayAve7th St N15th St NCounty Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N50th St N80th St NOls o n L a keTrN 20th St NKeatsAveNCommerceDrWildwoodRdMckusickRdNIdealAveN39thStNManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN40thStNJamacaAveNManningTrNNealAveSStillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrCentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan: Lake Elmo SegmentAugust 28, 2018POTENTIAL REGIONAL TRAIL ALIGNMENTSProposed Railroad CrossingsImprovements needed to existing underpassExisting Public Trails (6-10’ wide)Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide )Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide)Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide)Gateway State Trail (10’ wide)County ParksCity ParksPublic DestinationsSchoolProposed Underpass/OverpassPotential Regional Trail SegmentsBlueLight BlueRedDark RedOrangeViolet00.250.5 miNORTH Page Intentionally Blank 66 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 67Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 DOWNTOWN LAKE ELMOLAKE ELMO PUBLIC LIBRARYLAKE ELMO PARK RESERVESUNFISH LAKE PARKGiWXGlWX?ÇA@!"b$GnWXGsWX?öA@GoWXGqWXGqWXGqWXGoWXGlWX%&h(GoWXGoWXGkWXGnWXG¡WXGeWXSfN00.250.50.125Miles?¸A@CITY OF GRANTCITY OF LAKE ELMOCITY OF PINE SPRINGSCITY OF MAHTOMEDICITY OF STILLWATERCITY OF OAK PARK HEIGHTSBAYTOWN TOWNSHIPWEST LAKELAND TOWNSHIPCITY OF AFTONCITY OF WOODBURYCITY OF OAKDALEHorseshoe LakeJane LakeLake ElmoWhiteBearLakeLakeBielenberg DrSettlers Ridge PkwyTower DrTamarack RdRadioDrValley Creek RdWoodbury D r WeirDr75thStN50th St N62nd St NInterlachenPkwyHadleyAveNHudson AveWoodlan e D rHudsonRdSaint Johns DrHelmoAveNHudsonBlvdStillwater Rd4th St NCourtlyRdM a n n in g A v e N LakeElmoAveNMahtomediAve30th St N34th St NGreenwayAve7th St N15th St NCounty Rd 71BoutwellRdN 43rd St N50th St N80th St NOls o n L a keTrN 20th St NKeatsAveNCommerceDrWildwoodRdMckusickRdNIdealAveN39thStNManningAveS47th St NDemontrevilleTrN40thStNJamacaAveNManningTrNNealAveSStillwaterBlvdNHiltonTrStillwater WayPotential Trail Crossing Across RailroadPotential Trail Underpass Under RailroadPotential Trailhead Location at School/Lake Elmo City HallPotential Trailhead Location at High SchoolPotential Trailhead Location in ParkPotential Rest StopPotential Rest StopPotential Rest StopConnect to Proposed Bridge Over MN 36Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide)Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide )Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide)Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide)Gateway State Trail (10’ wide)County ParksCity ParksPublic DestinationsSchoolRailroad CrossingRegional Trail (on new trail)Regional Trail (on existing trail)Regional Trail Railroad Crossing AlternateInterim Regional Trail (on existing local trail)Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail)Intersection TypeFour-Way StopSignalized00.250.5 miNORTHPotential Grade Separated Crossing to High SchoolCentral Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan: Lake Elmo SegmentOctober 30, 2018PREFERRED REGIONAL TRAIL ALIGNMENT Page Intentionally Blank 68 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 69Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019N0400800200Feet 950920940 930 970 960 970 950920 940930 9 5 0 93 0 930930 9 2 0910900 920 900 890920 9 1 0 9 5 0 9 4 0 960950 920900 900 890 950 940 950940930920 940930 9 3 0 9 20920910 910 900 90088 0 970 960 940 930940 930 9409309 3 0 9 2 0 910 900 9109 00900890900 890 9008909 4 0920940 930 930 9 1 0960950 930 920930 9 1 0 8909709 6 0 9 6 0 9509509 5 0 940 950 93 0 940940940940940940940 940940940 940 930 9209209 2 0 930930930 930930930 930 9 3 0 9 3 0 930 920 910900 910910910 900900 890890 8909 0 0 890 890940 940 940 940 940 930 930 930 920 9 2 0 920 910 900 GnWX GqWX GqWX Stillwat er Bl v d N Lake Elmo Ave NLake Elmo Ave NLaverne Ave NLayton Ave N39th St N 36th St N Upper 33rd S t N 33rd St N 32nd St N Lampert Ave NKlondike Ave NKlondike Ave NLake Elmo Sunsh Lake LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE SUNFISH LAKE PARK LAKE ELMO PUBLIC LIBRARY LAKE ELMO PARK LAKE ELMO VFW BASEBALL FIELD POTENTIAL TRAILHEAD ATLAKE ELMO ELEMENTRYSCHOOL/LAKE ELMO CITY HALL EXISTING RIGHT-OF-WAY EXTENTS, TYP NARROW RIGHT-OF-WAY NARROW RIGHT-OF-WAY NARROW RIGHT-OF-WAY NARROW RIGHT-OF-WAY EXISTING SOFT SURFACE TRAIL POTENTIALTRAIL UNDERPASSUNDER RAILROAD POTENTIAL REST STOP TRAIL TO BE LOCATED AROUND PARK MAINTENANCE FACILITIES AND NURSERY POTENTIAL TRAIL CROSSING ACROSSRAILROAD EXISTINGEMERGENCYACCESS ROAD LAKE ELMO CITY HALL FUTURE INTERIM LOCAL TRAIL EXISTING INTERIM LOCAL TRAIL Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Parks Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) 0 200 400 ftNORTH Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan: Lake Elmo Segment October 30, 2018 PREFERRED REGIONAL TRAIL ALIGNMENT - LAKE ELMO ENLARGEMENT Page Intentionally Blank 70 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX C: DETAILED COST ESTIMATE 71Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Washington County Central Greenway Regional Trail Lake Elmo Segment Preliminary Engineering Estimate Draft 1/8/19 Estimated Project Construction Cost Estimated Quantity Unit of Measurement Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Total Cost Notes Segment R1 (I-94 to County Road 10) Existing 8' Trail Removal 5,871 Lin Ft $17 $99,807 5 10' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 5,871 Lin Ft $75 $440,325 6 Pedestrian Ramps 11 Each $2,600 $28,600 7 Wayfinding Directional Signage 1 Each $4,200 $4,200 Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)192 Sq Ft $80 $15,360 9 Segment R1 Total $594,792 Segment R2 (County Road 10 to Park Maintenance Access Road, Through Lake Elmo Park Reserve) Existing 8' Trail Removal 9,236 Lin Ft $17 $157,012 5 12' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 9,236 Lin Ft $85 $785,060 6 12' Trail Construction 2,289 Lin Ft $110 $251,790 6 Pedestrian Ramps 15 Each $2,600 $39,000 7 Wayfinding Directional Signage 2 Each $4,200 $8,400 Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8 Wayfinding Kiosk at Eagle Lake Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)160 Sq Ft $80 $12,800 9 Segment R2 Total $1,285,562 Segment R3 (Park Maintenance Access Road to Stillwater Lane North) 10' Trail Construction 5,380 Lin Ft $95 $511,100 6 Pedestrian Ramps 2 Each $2,600 $5,200 7 At-grade Railroad Crossing Improvements 1 Each $50,000 $50,000 11 Wayfinding Directional Signage 1 Each $4,200 $4,200 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)32 Sq Ft $80 $2,560 9 Segment R3 Total $573,060 Segment R4 (Stillwater Lane North to County Road 15/Manning Avenue) Existing 8' Trail Removal 1,116 Lin Ft $17 $18,972 5 10' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 1,116 Lin Ft $75 $83,700 6 10' Trail Construction 7,957 Lin Ft $95 $755,915 6 Pedestrian Ramps 24 Each $2,600 $62,400 7 Wayfinding Directional Signage 4 Each $4,200 $16,800 Wayfinding Kiosk at Downtown Lake Elmo Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)256 $80 $20,480 9 Wetland Mitigation 12,000 $2 $24,000 10 Segment R4 Total $1,007,267 Segment R5 (County Road 15/Manning Avenue to 58th Street North) 10' Trail Construction 10,175 Lin Ft $95 $966,625 6 Pedestrian Ramps 18 Each $2,600 $46,800 7 Wayfinding Directional Signage 2 Each $4,200 $8,400 Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8 Wayfinding Kiosk at Stillwater Highschool Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)192 $80 $15,360 9 Segment R5 Total $1,068,685 Segment R6 (58th Street North to MN 36) Existing 8' Trail Removal 238 Lin Ft $17 $4,046 5 10' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 238 Lin Ft $75 $17,850 6 10' Trail Construction 3,608 Lin Ft $95 $342,760 6 Pedestrian Ramps 4 Each $2,600 $10,400 7 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)64 $80 $5,120 9 Segment R6 Total $380,176 Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate $4,909,542 20% Construction Contingency1 $981,908 Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate with Construction Contingency $5,891,450 20% Design and Engineering Contingency $981,908 Total Estimated Construction Cost $6,873,359 Estimated Trail Overpass and Underpass Alternates Construction Cost Estimated Quantity Unit of Measurement Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Total Cost Notes Segment R3A (Park Maintenance Access Road to Stillwater Lane North) Trail Underpass 1 LS $1,500,000 $1,500,000 13 10' Trail Construction 2,789 Lin Ft $95 $264,955 6 Modular Block Gravity Wall 4,000 SF $70 $280,000 12 Segment R3A Total $2,044,955Pedestrian Bridge Across County Road 5 from Regional Trail to Stillwater High School Trail Overpass 1 Each $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Overpass Total $2,000,000 Estimated Annual Operations & Maintenance Costs Estimated Cost Notes Annual trail maintenance $5,500 Five year prairie establishment maintenance $10,000 Total Estimated Annual Operations & Maintenance Costs $15,500 Cost Estimate Notes: 3. Cost participation between regional park implementing agencies and other agencies on improvements beyond construction of the actual trail, such as any roadway reconstruction to accommodate the regional trail, shall be reviewed as 6. Trail construction assumes 10' or 12' bituminous trail, turf establishment, and signage. Estimate does not include any retaining walls or streetscaping such as 7. Includes items such as removing and reinstalling curb and gutter, driveway aprons and storm sewer catch basins. 8. Includes concrete pad, bench, trash receptacle, and bike rack. 9. Assumes 32 Sq Ft per road or significant driveway intersection. 10. Assumes 20 foot wide swath of wetland impacts. 11. Railroad crossing improvements include paved crossing surface and stop arms 12. Modular block wall for both sides of trail approach into underpass. 13. Trail underpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes 10'x14' concrete box culvert structu 14. Trail overpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes prefabricated steel structure on concr 4. Estimate does not include any utility relocation costs. 1. Construction cost estimate includes a 20% design and administration fee and an additional 20% construction contingency factor for unforeseen costs. 2. Estimates are based on 2018 bid prices. 5. Existing trail removal assumes 8' wide bituminous trail. Actual dimensions may vary. 72 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Washington CountyCentral Greenway Regional TrailLake Elmo Segment Preliminary Engineering Estimate Draft 1/8/19Estimated Project Construction Cost Estimated Quantity Unit of Measurement Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Total Cost NotesSegment R1 (I-94 to County Road 10)Existing 8' Trail Removal 5,871 Lin Ft $17 $99,807 510' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 5,871 Lin Ft $75 $440,325 6Pedestrian Ramps 11 Each $2,600 $28,600 7Wayfinding Directional Signage 1 Each $4,200 $4,200Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)192 Sq Ft $80 $15,360 9Segment R1 Total $594,792Segment R2 (County Road 10 to Park Maintenance Access Road, Through Lake Elmo Park Reserve)Existing 8' Trail Removal 9,236 Lin Ft $17 $157,012 512' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 9,236 Lin Ft $85 $785,060 612' Trail Construction 2,289 Lin Ft $110 $251,790 6Pedestrian Ramps 15 Each $2,600 $39,000 7Wayfinding Directional Signage 2 Each $4,200 $8,400Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8Wayfinding Kiosk at Eagle Lake Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)160 Sq Ft $80 $12,800 9Segment R2 Total $1,285,562Segment R3 (Park Maintenance Access Road to Stillwater Lane North)10' Trail Construction 5,380 Lin Ft $95 $511,100 6Pedestrian Ramps 2 Each $2,600 $5,200 7At-grade Railroad Crossing Improvements 1 Each $50,000 $50,000 11Wayfinding Directional Signage 1 Each $4,200 $4,200Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)32 Sq Ft $80 $2,560 9Segment R3 Total $573,060Segment R4 (Stillwater Lane North to County Road 15/Manning Avenue)Existing 8' Trail Removal 1,116 Lin Ft $17 $18,972 510' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 1,116 Lin Ft $75 $83,700 610' Trail Construction 7,957 Lin Ft $95 $755,915 6Pedestrian Ramps 24 Each $2,600 $62,400 7Wayfinding Directional Signage 4 Each $4,200 $16,800Wayfinding Kiosk at Downtown Lake Elmo Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)256 $80 $20,480 9Wetland Mitigation 12,000 $2 $24,000 10Segment R4 Total $1,007,267Segment R5 (County Road 15/Manning Avenue to 58th Street North)10' Trail Construction 10,175 Lin Ft $95 $966,625 6Pedestrian Ramps 18 Each $2,600 $46,800 7Wayfinding Directional Signage 2 Each $4,200 $8,400Rest Stops 1 Each $6,500 $6,500 8Wayfinding Kiosk at Stillwater Highschool Trailhead 1 Each $25,000 $25,000Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)192 $80 $15,360 9Segment R5 Total $1,068,685 Segment R6 (58th Street North to MN 36) Existing 8' Trail Removal 238 Lin Ft $17 $4,046 5 10' Trail Construction on Existing Trail 238 Lin Ft $75 $17,850 6 10' Trail Construction 3,608 Lin Ft $95 $342,760 6 Pedestrian Ramps 4 Each $2,600 $10,400 7 Traffic Control Signs and Devices (includes MUTCD signage)64 $80 $5,120 9 Segment R6 Total $380,176 Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate $4,909,54220% Construction Contingency1 $981,908 Subtotal Construction Cost Estimate with Construction Contingency $5,891,450 20% Design and Engineering Contingency $981,908 Total Estimated Construction Cost $6,873,359 Estimated Trail Overpass and Underpass Alternates Construction Cost Estimated Quantity Unit of Measurement Estimated Unit Cost Estimated Total Cost Notes Segment R3A (Park Maintenance Access Road to Stillwater Lane North) Trail Underpass 1 LS $1,500,000 $1,500,000 13 10' Trail Construction 2,789 Lin Ft $95 $264,955 6 Modular Block Gravity Wall 4,000 SF $70 $280,000 12 Segment R3A Total $2,044,955 Pedestrian Bridge Across County Road 5 from Regional Trail to Stillwater High School Trail Overpass 1 Each $2,000,000 $2,000,000 14 Overpass Total $2,000,000 Estimated Annual Operations & Maintenance Costs Estimated Cost Notes Annual trail maintenance $5,500 Five year prairie establishment maintenance $10,000 Total Estimated Annual Operations & Maintenance Costs $15,500 Cost Estimate Notes: 3. Cost participation between regional park implementing agencies and other agencies on improvements beyond construction of the actual trail, such as any roadway reconstruction to accommodate the regional trail, shall be reviewed as 6. Trail construction assumes 10' or 12' bituminous trail, turf establishment, and signage. Estimate does not include any retaining walls or streetscaping such as 7. Includes items such as removing and reinstalling curb and gutter, driveway aprons and storm sewer catch basins. 8. Includes concrete pad, bench, trash receptacle, and bike rack. 9. Assumes 32 Sq Ft per road or significant driveway intersection. 10. Assumes 20 foot wide swath of wetland impacts. 11. Railroad crossing improvements include paved crossing surface and stop arms 12. Modular block wall for both sides of trail approach into underpass. 13. Trail underpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes 10'x14' concrete box culvert structu 14. Trail overpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes prefabricated steel structure on concr 4. Estimate does not include any utility relocation costs. 1. Construction cost estimate includes a 20% design and administration fee and an additional 20% construction contingency factor for unforeseen costs. 2. Estimates are based on 2018 bid prices. 5. Existing trail removal assumes 8' wide bituminous trail. Actual dimensions may vary. Segment Acres Cost* Segment R4 Subtotal 3.40 $1,102,000 Segment R5 Subtotal 0.31 $315,000 Total 3.71 $1,417,000 *Estimated costs reflect 2019 tax assessed values only for the portion of parcel needed. Future Property Acquisitions (2019 tax assessed values) ESTIMATE NOTES 1. Construction cost estimate includes a 20% design and administration fee and an additional 20% construction contingency factor for unforeseen costs. 2. Estimates are based on 2018 bid prices. 3. Cost participation between regional park implementing agencies and other agencies on improvements beyond construction of the actual trail, such as any roadway reconstruction to accommodate the regional trail, shall be reviewed as implementation is considered. 4. Estimate does not include any utility relocation costs. 5. Existing trail removal assumes 8’ wide bituminous trail. Actual dimensions may vary. 6. Trail construction assumes 10’ or 12’ bituminous trail, turf establishment, and signage. Estimate does not include any retaining walls or streetscaping such as boulevard trees and decorative lighting. 7. Includes items such as removing and reinstalling curb and gutter, driveway aprons and storm sewer catch basins. 8. Includes concrete pad, bench, trash receptacle, and bike rack. 9. Assumes 32 Sq Ft of signage per roadway intersection. Also assumes crosswalk striping is included in signal improvements (by others). 10. Assumes 20 foot wide swath of wetland impacts. 11. Railroad crossing improvements include paved crossing surface and stop arms 12. Modular block wall for both sides of trail approach into underpass. 13. Trail underpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes 10’x14’ concrete box culvert structure. 14. Trail overpass price includes contingency costs for utility relocation, traffic control, construction and contractor safety. Assumes prefabricated steel structure on concrete abutments. 73Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank 74 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX D: RARE SPECIES LIST This appendix includes a complete list of rare species found within one mile of the Central Greenway Regional Trail. A one-mile buffer surrounding the project limits was evaluated for the presence of rare plants, animals, native plant communities, and other rare features using Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in conjunction with the MnDNR’s Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS)1. The Natural Heritage data is provided by the MnDNR’s Division of Ecological Resources and Water Resources, and was current as of February 2016 (License Agreement 625). These data are not based on an exhaustive inventory of the state. The lack of data for any geographic area shall not be construed to mean that no significant features are present. SPECIES: »A Jumping Spider »Bald Eagle »Blanding’s Turtle »Lake Bed »Least Darter »Oak - (Red Maple) Woodland »Pugnose Shiner »Sand Beach (Inland Lake) »Rusty Patch Bumble Bee 1 Copyright 2016 State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources. 75Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank 76 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX E: WIKIMAP RESULTS Wikimap Comments 0 0.25 0.5 miNORTH The red line makes the most sense to me, because it 1) makes the most direct connections through Lake Elmo for through bikers, 2) allows utilization of existing park infrastructure like the Nordic Center, and 3) minimizes potential conflict with existing I may have misunderstood what would be allowed on these trails. If there are no motorized vehicles, only provisions for hiking & biking, I am mistaken. Please, please do not add a trail right down the middle of LE Park Preserve! Noisy ATMs and motorcycles will ruin the peace and quiet needed for both humans and wildlife in the park. Poor visibility - poor line of sight for vehicles vs. pedestrians. I like the red route. It accesses Stillwater Area High School, which has ~2,500 students. Providing them a safe route for walking, biking, and running is of tremendous value. Poor visibility intersection - poor line of sight for vehicles vs. pedestrians. No shoulders exist - no shoulders planned. Extremely poor line of sight to the South at this intersection. Lake Elmo Ave has a steep grade/sharp hill on approach toward 33rd St. Very difficult to cross Lake Elmo Ave. at 4pm - 5:30pm. Strongly recommend against directing pedestrian/ bicycle traffic Existing Public Trails (6-10’ wide) Existing Private Trails (6-10’ wide ) Existing County Soft Surface Trials (6’ wide) Existing County/Regional Trails (8-10’ wide) Gateway State Trail (10’ wide) County Parks City Parks Regional Trails Regional Trail (on new trail) Regional Trail (on existing trail) Regional Trail Railroad Crossing Alternate Interim Regional Trail (on existing local trail) Interim Regional Trail (on future local trail) Wikimap Comment Location 77Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Page Intentionally Blank 78 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 APPENDIX F: PARK AND TRAIL VISITATION DATA PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7-5 Park and Trail Visitation Washington County and the Metropolitan Council collect data and produce reports on who visits regional parks and trails, and how they are being used. These reports allow Washington County to track visitation and usage data overtime, and assess performance. Determining the types of users and their needs is an important step when evaluating future park and trail needs. Ultimately, this information helps Washington County make informed decisions for planning, building, and maintaining the parks and trails system. In this section, the following reports that evaluate Washington County park and trail visitation will be described:  Annual Use Estimate of the Regional Parks System  Regional Parks System Visitor Study  Washington County Park Visitor Study  Regional Park Use Among Select Communities of Color Annual Use Estimate of the Regional Parks System (2016) The Metropolitan Council annually produces the Annual Use Estimate of the Regional Parks System. This report collects visitation data within each unit and extrapolates it to produce an annual estimate for every regional park and trail in the seven-county area. Key findings from the 2016 report included:  Washington County parks received approximately 1.35 million visits in 2016, which accounts for 2.9 percent of visits in all regional parks and trails. The table below breaks down Washington County park and trail visitation by unit.  An estimated 56.1 percent of park visitors were from Washington County, while the other 43.9 percent came from outside Washington County to visit. Table 3: Total Park Visits in 2016 Park Unit Total Visits (2016) Big Marine Park Reserve 240,700 Cottage Grove Ravine Regional Park 70,800 Hardwood Creek Regional Trail 208,300 Lake Elmo Park Reserve 519,900 Pine Point Regional Park 95,500 Square Lake Special Recreation Feature 95,900 St. Croix Bluffs Regional Park 116,900 Totals 1,348,000 79Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7-6 Regional Parks System Visitor Study (2016) The Metropolitan Council also commissioned the Regional Parks System Visitor Study (2016) to provide benchmark data of park and trail visitor experiences at regional parks and trails. Key findings from the report included:  When compared with other implementation agencies, Washington County park and trail users were more likely to:  Rate the quality of facilities, services, and recreation opportunities as very good (73 percent)  Visit a park closer to home (average of 9.5 miles to travel to park)  Arrive in an automobile (81 percent)  Look for information prior to visiting (18 percent)  Bring kids under age 10 (30 percent)  Report a larger average group size (average group size of 2.84)  Visit longer periods of time (average time spent of 3.01 hours)  Say that lack of free time is the primary barrier to visiting more often (83 percent)  Disparities in Washington County park and trail visitation included:  Age of Washington County park and trail users (see Figure 4)  Household income of Washington County park and trail users (see Figure 5)  Educational attainment of Washington County park and trail users (see Figure 6)  Physical or mental ability of Washington County park and trail users (see Figure 7)  Race and ethnicity of Washington County park and trail users (see Figure 8) 2016 Age Cohorts of Park and Trail Users 6.70% 9.80% 17.70% 21.60% 17.80% 16.20% 10.40% 0.50% 9.50% 17.50% 16.30% 22.90% 23.90% 9.50% 0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00% 75-older 65-74 55-64 45-54 35-44 25-34 18-24 Washington County Park/Trail Visitors Washington County Residents 80 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7-7 2016 Household Income of Park and Trail Users 2016 Educational Attainment of Park and Trail Users 9.5% 8.9% 21.6% 25.8% 7.3% 6.5% 6.9% 5.3% 8.4% 4.4% 10.9% 15.7% 47.1% 10.2% 5.7% 2.7% 1.5% 1.9% 0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0% $200,00 or more $150,000-$199,999 $100,000-$149,999 $60,000-$99,999 $50,000-$59,999 $40,000-$49,999 $30,000-$39,999 $20,000-$29,999 Less than $20,000 Washington County Park/Trail Visitors Washington County Residents 0.0% 14.1% 0.0% 27.3% 11.1% 21.2% 22.2% 4.0% 0.7% 23.7% 4.5% 42.7% 9.5% 11.5% 7.5% 0.2% 0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0% Prefer not to say Completed graduate degree(Master's or PhD) Some graduate work College bachelor's degree Associate degree or vocationaldegree Some college but no degree Completed high school Did not finish high school Washington County Park/Trail Visitors Washington County Residents 81Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7-8 2016 Physical and Mental Ability of Park and Trail Users1: 2016 Race and Ethnicity of Park and Trail Users 1 Responses reflect answers to the following question: “Does anyone in your group have a physical or mental condition that makes it difficult to access or participate in [Park/Trail] activities or services?” 91.6% 98.0% 8.4% 2.0% Washington County Residents Washington County Park/Trail Visitors Yes No 87.0% 87.2% 13.0% 12.8% Washington County Residents Washington County Park/Trail Visitors White, Non-Latino Person of Color 82 Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 PARKS, TRAILS AND OPEN SPACE WASHINGTON COUNTY 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 7-2 Washington County Park Visitor Study (2016) Washington County Parks conducts an independent Visitor Use Survey annually. These responses serve as another tool to measure visitation and park use. Furthermore, it gives Washington County flexibility in asking questions unique to the County (as opposed to the region as a whole). Key findings from the report included:  Survey respondents primarily engaged in the following activities:  Nature walks/trails  Swimming  Boating/Fishing  Camping  Biking (paved trails  Programs visitors provided responses on activities they would like to see offered (or offered more frequently) in Washington County Parks:  Canoeing/kayaking lessons  Outdoor recreation for women  Moonlight hike/ski  Tree & plant identification  Cross country ski lessons/rental Regional Park Use Among Select Communities of Color (2014) In 2014, the Metropolitan Council staff produced the Regional Park Use Among Select Communities of Color report to better understand and address disproportionate or inequitable park use and identify barriers to regional park visitation among communities of color. Metropolitan Council staff partnered with several local community-based organizations and public agencies to collect demographic data and organize focus groups throughout the metropolitan region. Key findings from the report included:  The most prominent perceived barriers to regional park system visitation among focus group participants were:  Lack of awareness  Time available  Fear/safety concerns  Lack of transportation options  Language barrier  The most prominent suggestions from focus group participants to enhance regional park system visits were:  Increase awareness  Address safety  Enhance capacity of gathering spaces  Create ambassador program  Increase and diversify programming 83Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan Amendment: Lake Elmo Segment \\ June 12, 2019 Keats Ave. N. - Tapestry 43Rd St.— Sunfish Ponds 1600– Ft.