HomeMy WebLinkAbout#07 - Parks Master PlanSTAFF REPORT
DATE: 07/02/2024
CONSENT
TO: CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA ITEM: Parks Master Plan
FROM: Adam Swanepoel, Assistant Public Works Director
SUBMITTED BY: Marty Powers, Public Works Director
BACKGROUND:
At the October 2023 City Council meeting, the City selected Bolton and Menk to develop and
prepare a new Parks Master Plan. The purpose of an updated parks master plan would help guide
commissioners, council and staff over the next ten years but also provide insight on potential
changes, additions and an evaluation of the current park system.
Bolton and Menk spent the next eight months gathering data and preparing documents for the
next Master Plan. During this time an advisory committee was developed and included
commissioner Kasler from the Parks Commission. The advisory group meet four times during
the preparation of the document to assist in recommendations, suggestions an ideas for the future
plan. Community input was gathered from an online survey and two pop up events held during
Light up Lake Elmo and the Arbor Day tree give away event.
Bolton and Menk presented the Parks Master Plan to the Parks Commission on May 20, 2024.
Commissioners voted unanimously in favor and recommended the plan to council for approval.
The plan was brought in front for City Council at the June 11th workshop for discussion.
ISSUE BEFORE CITY COUNCIL:
Would City Council like to approve the Parks Master Plan?
PROPOSAL DETAILS/ANALYSIS:
Part of the development for a new Parks Master Plan, Bolton and Menk was asked to provide the following
items in the Master Plan:
- Goals, objectives, and policy statements with a clear vision and direction for the City
- An updated City Park inventory, evaluation of existing park use layout and its facilities
- An updated trail system and network plan, identify the gaps in the existing/planned trail
system
- Evaluation of existing park use, layout and facilities
- A summary of existing conditions and level of service analysis
- A major park infrastructure repair and replace schedule, considering potential changes in the
existing infrastructure
- Charts, graphs, maps, and other data as needed to support the plan
In addition, Bolton and Menk was asked to consider researching and including additional
information which would help map the future of Lake Elmo and the park system, they included;
- Demographic Trends
- Include compatibility with current ADA requirements
- Recommendations on removal of any obsolete facilities and inclusion on new types of
recreational facilities or amenities to engage the community.
- Prioritizing recommendations for improvement to current park facilities and identify
opportunities for undeveloped parks.
- Create a prioritization strategy to guide decision making and investments in the park
system.
- Phased implementation plan and 20 year CIP
- Identify ideal funding sources such as grants or recreational funding
Bolton and Menk provided a Parks Master Plan with all the requirements as well as the
additional considerations suggested by city staff.
FISCAL IMPACT:
There are no financial oblations to accepting the Parks Master Plan. Funding for the plan was
taken from the professional services budget.
RECOMMENDATION:
“Move to approve the Parks Master Plan as prepared by Bolton and Menk.”
ATTACHMENTS:
2024 Parks Master Plan
PARK SYSTEM PLANCITY OF LAKE ELMO
DR
A
F
T
07/02/2024
i
PREPARED FOR
City of Lake Elmo
3880 Laverne Ave N
Lake Elmo, MN 55042
CITY STAFF
Adam Swanepoel
»Assistant Public Works Director
Sophia Jensen
»City Planner
CITY COUNCIL
Charles Cadenhead
»Mayor
Jeff Holtz
Katrina Beckstrom
Matt Hirn
Nick Dragisich
»City Council Members
PREPARED BY
Bolton & Menk, Inc.
111 N Washington Ave, Unit 650
Minneapolis, MN 55401
PROJECT TEAM
Josh Shields
Principal Landscape Architect
Anna Springer
Senior Project Landscape Architect
Aus Perez
Landscape Designer
Rachel LeMire
Project Communications Specialist
ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Bob Horn Michael Schuster
Brad Adams Peter Kastler
Brad Kompelien Todd Bruchu
Greta Farley Tracy Petersen
Matthew Ras William Zins
Michael Bambenek
PARK COMMISSION
Ellen Esch
Hank Hoelscher
Michael Elam
Pat Barrett
Peter Kastler
Tammy Sturtz
Vittorio Bloyer
WITH SPECIAL THANKS TO
City council members, the park commission,
city staff, public works staff, the Advisory
Committee, and the community participants
who provided feedback to help assist in the
planning of this document
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
ii
01 | INTRODUCTION....................................................................................04
»Context
»Community Demographics
»The Process + Purpose
»Past Planning Efforts
»Using the Plan
02 | EXISTING CONDITIONS & NEEDS..................................................12
»Overview
»Inventory of the System
»Park Classifications
»Existing Amenities + Facilities
»Existing Programming
»NRPA Agency Benchmarks
»Service Area + Facility Guidelines
»Public Engagement Summary
»SWOT Analysis
»Pop-Up Events
»Community Survey Findings
05 | RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................................62
»Overview
»Park Recommendations
»Facility Recommendations
»Connectivity Recommendations
»Open Space + Preserve Recommendations
»Operations + Maintenance Recommendations
06 | IMPLEMENTATION.............................................................................84
»Setting Priorities
»Funding Resources
07 | APPENDIX...............................................................................................95
04 | TRENDS ANALYSIS..............................................................................50
»Overview of Trends
»Trends 1-8
03 | VISION & GUIDING PRINCIPLES...................................................46
»The Vision
»The Guiding Principles
CONTENT
06
07
09
10
11
64
65
68
78
81
82
52
53
48
49
86
92
14
15
18
21
23
24
26
38
39
40
42
4 Figure 1.1: Aerial view of Lake Jane
5
0101
INTRODUCTIONINTRODUCTION
Lake Elmo provides an expansive system of parks, trails, and open spaces for
its community members and visitors to enjoy. The city’s parks and trails are
clean and well-maintained, and community members feel safe when visiting
them. Residents frequent the park and trail system, with many making weekly
trips to local neighborhood playgrounds and recreational trails. While residents
value their park and recreational amenities, the city recognizes a need to keep
their park system current, continue to meet the needs of the community, and
continue to offer quality amenities to its residents.
The Lake Elmo Park System Plan does not seek to reinvent the park and trail
system or stray too far from the original intent of past planning efforts.
Instead, the plan advocates for thoughtful, community-driven improvements to
the city’s existing parks and trails that are rooted in an understanding of the
system’s history, ecology, and intended purpose.
This plan is intended to be a living document. It can be amended to adapt
to evolving community needs as conditions and circumstances change. The
application of local knowledge should be used to support plan changes to
ensure the plan continues to fit the needs and concerns of the community.
Implementing this plan will require collaboration and coordination between
a variety of stakeholders, including city staff, city council, the parks
commission, and the community.
WASHINGTON COUNTY CITY OF LAKE ELMO
6 | INTRODUCTION
CONTEXT
The City of Lake Elmo is located near the confluence
of the St. Croix and Mississippi Rivers, just west of
the Minnesota-Wisconsin border and east of St.
Paul. The population of Lake Elmo is currently 13,756
people, but the city is projected to grow to upwards
of 18,000 people by 2030, making it the fastest
growing city in the state of Minnesota. Despite Lake
Elmo’s booming growth, the city has maintained a
charming rural look and feel for many years, due its
many acres of agricultural and farm land. The city
encompasses approximately 24 square miles of land
(including woodland, meadow, lakes, and wetlands)
and borders many adjacent communities, including:
• Grant to the north
• Oak Park Heights, Baytown and West Lakeland
Townships to the east
• Woodbury to the south
• Oakdale to the west.
With an interesting mix of rural features, natural
scenery, and suburban comfort, Lake Elmo is
a desirable location due to its proximity to
Minneapolis and St. Paul, accessible and high-
quality neighborhoods, and many lakes and natural
areas. With its picturesque farms, rolling hills, and
extensive park and trail system, Lake Elmo offers a
peaceful retreat from the hustle and bustle of urban
life. With 18% of the city’s land acreage protected as
park or open space and an additional 11% of private
land areas protected with a conservation easement,
Lake Elmo is committed to preserving its existing
natural resources and open space framework so that
residents have sufficient opportunities to enjoy the
great outdoors for many years to come.
“OUR COMMUNITY, NEIGHBORHOODS AND HOMES
ARE OUR RETREAT. WE LIVE IN A PLACE WITH DIVERSE
NEIGHBORHOOD PATTERNS AND HOUSING OPTIONS -
BUT EVERY RESIDENT HAS ACCESS TO A GREAT PARK,
OPEN SPACE OR TRAIL... WE ARE A COLLECTION OF
NEIGHBORHOODS THAT TOGETHER SHARE A COMMITMENT
TO MAKING THE CITY AN EXCEPTIONAL PLACE TO LIVE,
WORK, AND RECREATE.”
- LAKE ELMO VISION FOR 2040
Moorhead
St. Cloud
Mankato
Minneapolis
St. Croix River
Lake Elmo
Mississippi River
St. Paul
Rochester
I-
6
9
4
HWY 10
HWY 14
I-94
HW
Y
1
5
HWY 36
7
COMMUNITY DEMOGRAPHICS
Taking a closer look at Lake Elmo’s demographic
makeup reveals a few key characteristics and
insights, including:
• The city has a predominantly white population,
along with smaller communities of Asian,
Hispanic, and African American residents
• The median household income in Lake Elmo
exceeds national averages, reflecting a relatively
affluent community with well-maintained
infrastructure, quality services, and thriving
businesses
• The city highly values education; in fact, nearly
two-thirds of the population has a bachelor’s
degree
• The unemployment rate in Lake Elmo is 3.5%,
reflecting a healthy job market and economy
• Only 3% of households in Lake Elmo are below
poverty level
Key Facts
Population by Age: 5-Year Increments
(2021)
2021 Population by Race,
Age 18+
13,756
2023 Total Population
337
2023 Total (SIC01-99)
Businesses
4,914
2023 Total Households
$163,359
2023 Median
Household Income
8%
7%
6%
5%
4%
3%
2%
1%
0%
Dots show comparison to Washington County
0-
4
10
-
1
4
20
-
2
4
30
-
3
4
50
-
5
4
40
-
4
4
60
-
6
4
70
-
7
4
80
-
8
4
2+ Races
Other Race
Pacific Islander
Asian
Native
American
Black
White
0%10 30 50 70204060 80
Education
No High
School Diploma
21%
Some College
15%
High School Graduate
2%
62%
Bachelor’s/Master’s/Prof
Degree
2017-2021 Transportation to Work
Age 16+
65%
Drove Alone
9%
Carpooled
0%
Bicycled
1%
Public
Transportation
0%
Walked
Employment (2023)Poverty Status (2017-2021)
Persons with a Disability
(2017-2021)
3%
Households Below the Poverty Level
17%
Households with 1+ Persons with a Disability
White Collar
Blue Collar
Services
Unemployment
Rate3.5%
8 | INTRODUCTION
81%
12%
8%
9
THE PROCESS + PURPOSE
STEP 01
INFORMATION
GATHERING
Inventory of existing park and trail amenities & assessment of current conditions and site features
Thorough review of existing conditions, concurrent planning studies, NRPA benchmarks and public input to identify preliminary improvement strategies
Develop recommendations for the park system, as well as budgetary cost estimates for capital improvement planning and implementation
Information developed during planning process is compiled into this report, reviewed by the city and Advisory Committee, refined and presented to city council for consideration and adoption
Online community survey and in-person engagement events
PUBLIC
OUTREACH
ANALYSIS
IMPROVEMENT
RECOMMENDATIONS
REVIEW, REFINEMENT
AND ADOPTION
STEP 05
STEP 04
STEP 03
STEP 02
This park system planning process was a nine-
month project that began with an inventory and
analysis of each city-owned park and open space
amenity. This analysis documented park amenities,
site furnishings, and notable site features, in
addition to the general condition of these items at
each location.
In order to provide a useful, user-friendly, and
sustainable planning document for Lake Elmo, the
planning team - made up of landscape architects,
parks planners/designers, and community
engagement specialists - had many discussions
with city staff and Advisory Committee members
to uncover issues affecting the city’s parks, trails,
and open spaces. Discussions with city staff and
the Advisory Committee were facilitated by the
consultant team, to better understand the history
of park and trail improvements and evaluate the
existing conditions of each park in the system.
The Advisory Committee provided valuable insight
into how community members and visitors use the
park system, as well as relevant information about
changes affecting the city’s resources over the
years.
Early in the planning process, the public was
engaged through an online survey. This survey was
conducted over an eight week period and resulted
in participation from over 500 community members.
Results from this survey helped inform the needs
analysis and plan recommendations.
10 | INTRODUCTION
PAST PLANNING EFFORTS
There are a handful of past planning efforts that
were considered during the creation of this report.
Key plans, reports and standards that helped inform
the development of this report include:
• Lake Elmo’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
• Washington County’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
• The Central Greenway Regional Trail Master Plan
• Lake Elmo’s 2009 Comprehensive Parks and
Recreation Plan
• Lake Elmo’s Design Guidelines and Standards
The planning team used these documents to obtain
background information on the city, to understand
what goals and strategies have been previously
developed for the city’s park and trail system, and
to inform the development of the recommendations
(and eventual implementation strategies) included
in this plan.
Some key takeaways from past planning documents
related to parks, trails and open spaces in Lake Elmo
include (but are not limited to):
KEY GOALS AND PRINCIPLES FROM PAST PLANNING DOCUMENTS
• Lake Elmo’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan
»Enhance existing natural resources, open space and trails to make a more complete system
»Strengthen the existing trail network in the City, increase public connections, and improve
accessibility (including pedestrian and bikeway connections)
»Endorse and maintain the protected public open space and natural areas throughout the City
»Protect and strengthen existing park facilities and program uses according to demands of
residents that use the facilities, and plan for appropriate programming and facilities in new
neighborhoods
»Explore opportunities to improve the quality of degraded, but important, natural resources in
the City (i.e., impaired lakes, streams, and wetlands)
• Lake Elmo’s 2009 Comprehensive Parks and Recreation Plan
»Showcase, preserve, and respect the city’s natural resources and let the location of natural
resources guide the placement and use of parks
»Locate parks so that all current and prospective neighborhoods have a local park (where
practical and appropriate)
»Connect city parks to each other and to prominent destination within and outside of the city
through a system of trails
»Locate a significant park at the heart of Lake Elmo that can serve as a community gathering
place and landmark
11
USING THE PLAN
01: INTRODUCTION
»The introduction provides an overview of the
planning process and purpose, as well as a
brief look at demographics and community
context
02: EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
»This section evaluates the Lake Elmo system
through various lenses and outlines future
needs
03: VISION + GUIDING PRINCIPLES
»This section helps set the stage for what
is desired by the community for the future
system and what overarching ideas should
help steer its future
04: TRENDS ANALYSIS
»Understanding social, demographic, and
recreational trends is an important of
maintaining a responsive park system.
This section highlights key trends that are
impacting today’s parks and recreation
systems and help inform the plan
05: RECOMMENDATIONS
»Recommended actions to help attain the
vision for the system provide the backbone
of the plan, building off the analysis and
vision
06: IMPLEMENTATION
»This section outlines steps to carry out the
proposed recommendations, and includes
priorities, capital improvements, and funding
ideas
07: APPENDIX
»Supporting documents including park
This park system plan document is organized into
seven sections, which include:
»01: Introduction
»02: Existing Conditions + Needs
»03: Visions + Guiding Principles
»04: Trends Analysis
»05: Recommendations
»06: Implementation
»07: Appendix
The contents of this park system plan report include
park inventory data, community input results,
analysis of all collected data, recommendations and
implementation strategies for Lake Elmo’s parks,
trails, and open spaces.
The report’s appendix includes park inventory maps
and the complete community survey results.
12 Figure 2.1: Expansive view over Lake Elmo
13
0202
EXISTING CONDITIONS EXISTING CONDITIONS
+ NEEDS+ NEEDS
Inventory and analysis is an essential component to the park system planning
process. In order to make informed and appropriate decisions to address the
diverse park and trail-related needs of the community, a deep understanding of
the current state of the city’s parks and trails is required.
This assessment looks at the quantity, distribution, quality, and current use
of the various elements of the systems. The data is collected and compared
to standards and benchmarks provided by the National Recreation and Parks
Association (NRPA), as well as park planning principles including level of
service. Local input from residents, volunteers, and city staff also provide
critical information about the system and its use.
14 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
OVERVIEW
APPROACH
The recreational opportunities that Lake Elmo’s
parks, trails, and open spaces provide are vital to
maintaining the quality of life that community
members in the city value. These public spaces are
integral parts of the city’s infrastructure and are
proactively managed.
As part of the park and trail system planning effort,
the planning team collaborated with city staff
and key stakeholders to develop near-term and
long-range improvements that will assist them in
directing decision making and allocating resources
toward a clearly defined vision for the community’s
park and trail system. Community input was
gathered using a comprehensive and engaging
outreach process that prioritized accessibility
for all park and trail users. This approach created
opportunities for the public to inform and educate
the planning team about the future park and trail
system they’d like to see.
The goal of this park system planning process is to
support the vision of a healthy, sustainable, and
maintainable park and trail system and to discover
creative, efficient, and long-term solutions to issues
affecting those systems. Lake Elmo needs a plan
they can use to guide decision making - a plan
they can reference when deciding to take topics
and considerations to the parks commission or city
council.
PROCESS PRINCIPLES
The planning process was guided by seven
overarching principles. These principles aim to
provide a plan that propels Lake Elmo’s parks and
trails system into the next 10 years and beyond.
The plan should reflect the
community’s shared concerns,
aspirations, and anticipated future
growth
The plan should be easy to read and
use, avoid technical terms when
possible, and emphasize visuals
(e.g., photos, infographics, etc.)
The plan should create opportunities
for all stakeholders to connect to
open space, greenways, trails, parks,
and conservation areas, thereby
building environmental stewardship
and strengthening relationships to
the outdoors and healthy lifestyles
The plan should be thoughtful
and pragmatic while challenging
conventional wisdom when needing
to achieve an outcome, as well
as recognize and incorporate the
economic benefits of a strong park
and recreation system
The plan should focus on
implementable tools with specific,
measurable outcomes while being
adaptable to future change
The plan should engage the
community throughout the process
to ensure outcomes are responsive
and authentic of Lake Elmo and
embraced by the community
The plan should intentionally
incorporate changing demographics,
disparate viewpoints, needs, and
accessibility with the intent of
hearing and acknowledging all voices
VISIONARY
ACCESSIBLE
CONNECTED
STRATEGIC
INCLUSIVE
COMMUNITYORIENTED
ACTIONORIENTED
15
INVENTORY OF THE SYSTEM
INVENTORY
With over 500 acres of city parkland and more
than 80 miles of trails, Lake Elmo has quite an
extensive park and trail system for residents and
visitors to enjoy and explore. In late 2023, the
planning team and city staff had an opportunity
to conduct an inventory of the city’s substantial
park and trail system to better understand each
park’s existing amenities and features, as well as
record the condition/state they’re currently in. With
an updated and in-depth inventory of Lake Elmo’s
many parks, trails, and open spaces, the city will
be able to better track the condition of their park
equipment and implement a plan and timeline for
their continued maintenance and replacement.
Currently, Lake Elmo’s park and trail system
supports a variety of recreational opportunities,
including organized sports, casual play, nature
appreciation, hiking, cross-country skiing, horseback
riding, picnicking, relaxing, and many other
outdoor activities. Each park in the system provides
quality recreation facilities and open spaces for
the community to use while still maintaining the
history, setting, character, and use that makes each
park unique.
To better understand how well Lake Elmo is meeting
the recreational needs of the community, each
park’s assets (e.g., natural resources, recreational
facilities, amenities, etc.) and issues (e.g.,
environmental limitations, infrastructure problems,
accessibility, etc.) were identified during the
park inventory process. Some key takeaways and
insights drawn from the park inventory process
include:
• Park acreage and distribution and trail mileage
in Lake Elmo are good; most of the gaps in park
and trail connectivity occur in the north-central
and southeastern portions of the city
• Lake Elmo has a nice variety of park types,
including mini parks, neighborhood parks,
community parks, and a Washington County
regional park, all of which serve the community
in important ways
• Lake Elmo’s park facilities and amenities
are generally in good, working condition;
however, some park features (e.g., playgrounds,
ballfields, shelters, etc.) are currently not
meeting the needs of the community or not
functioning to meet demand
• Park and trail connectivity is reduced by a lack
of wayfinding, infrastructure restraints, and
unsafe pedestrian crossings on busy streets
Figure 3.2: Planning team and city staff inventorying the park and trail system
16 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.3 | PARKS MAP
17
FIGURE 3.4 | EXISTING + PROPOSED TRAILS MAP
A NOTE ABOUT LAKE ELMO PARK RESERVE
Lake Elmo Park Reserve (LEPR) is a 2,165 acre park located in
the heart of Lake Elmo. It is owned and operated by Washington
County, and features archery, biking, camping, paddling, cross
country skiing, playgrounds, a swimming pond, and other
facilities. Admission is required for all vehicles entering the park.
While Lake Elmo residents have access to this regional amenity,
the city does not have direct input on the improvements,
operations, or maintenance of LEPR. As such, it is largely excluded
from amenity access considerations throughout the plan.
For example, the playgrounds at LEPR are not included in the
playround distribution analysis. LEPR is included, however, in the
park access map, as residents walking or biking into the regional
park are not required to pay an admission fee.
18 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
NRPA PARKCLASSIFICATION STANDARDS
Lake Elmo contains a variety of park types which
can be distinguished from one another based upon
their unique sizes, characteristics, and intended
uses. To help park and recreation professionals
more effectively manage their park systems
and resources, the NRPA developed a set of park
classifications, agency benchmarks, and service area
and facility guidelines (all described in further detail
in following pages) for agencies to utilize. Many
park and recreation agencies use these resources
to compare how their community’s amenities stack
up against other communities. Incorporating these
metrics into the park system planning process can
lead to more informed decisions, better resource
allocation, improved equity, and a higher likelihood
of successful implementation and long-term
sustainability.
According to Lake Elmo’s 2040 Comprehensive Plan,
the city contains the following park classifications:
• Regional Park
»Lake Elmo Park Reserve
• Community Park
»DeMontreville Wildlife Park
»Sunfish Lake Park
• Neighborhood Park
»Carriage Station Park
»DeMontreville Park
»Goose Lake Park
»Heights Park
»Heritage Park
»Ivywood Park
»Kleis Park
»Lake Jane Hills Park
»Lions Park
»Pebble Park
»Reid Park
»Ridge Park
PARK CLASSIFICATIONS
»Stonegate Park
»Tablyn Park
»Tana Ridge Park
»VFW Park
• Natural Resource Protection Area/Conservation
Easement
»Hammes Park
»Homestead Park
»
There were also a few parks in the system that were
not explicitly classified in the 2040 Comprehensive
Plan. They include:
• Unclassified
»Firefly Park
»Hidden Knoll Park
»Legion Ave N Park
»Pilot Park
»
The table on the next page provides additional
information about each NRPA park classification’s
size, service area, typical location, and purpose.
Classifying parks in this way ensures the
appropriate management and conservation
practices are applied based on each park’s specific
purpose and unique characteristics. Developing
and maintaining the system according to these
guidelines will positively impact the community and
its resources into the future.
19
TABLE 3.1 | NRPA PARK CLASSIFICATIONS
CLASSIFICATION SIZE
(TYP.)
SERVICE
AREA
ACCESSIBILITY/
LOCATION
PURPOSE LAKE ELMO
PARKS
COMMON PARK TYPES
Neighborhood
Park
1 to 25+
acres
A 1/4 to 1/2-
mile radius;
within a
walkable
distance to
surrounding
residents
without any
major barriers
Easily accessible
to nearby
neighborhood
residents in a safe
environment with
walking & biking
access
• Provides active recreation
& information gathering
spaces and addresses
day-to-day neighborhood
needs
• Offers fields sized for
practice/youth games”
• Carriage Station,
DeMontreville,
Goose Lake,
Heights,
Heritage,
Ivywood, Kleis,
Lake Jane Hills,
Lions, Pebble,
Reid, Ridge,
Stonegate,
Tablyn, Tana
Ridge, + VFW Park
Community
Park
10-50+
acres;
up to
several
hundred
acres
Community-
wide;
generally
placed in
strategic
locations
throughout
the city
Accessible to
the community
by foot, bike,
automobile &
public transit;
often takes
advantage of
natural amenities
• Serves the entire
community
• May provide access to
natural areas & other
active recreation areas
• Often serves regional
visitors (not primary
purpose, however)
• DeMontreville
Wildlife Park
• Sunfish Lake Park
Regional
Park
Up to
several
hundred
acres
Community-
wide &
regional
service
Varies; often
placed/centered
around natural
environments
• Uses vary; focused mainly
on outdoor & natural
resource-based recreation
and learning opportunities
• Lake Elmo
Park Reserve
(Washington
County)
ADDITIONAL PARK/FACILITY TYPES
Special Use
Varies Community-
wide &
regional
service
Site-specific • Serves a single-use
activity (e.g., golf, fitness,
ice skating, nature
education, etc.)
• N/A
Natural Resource
Protection Area/
Conservation
Easement
Varies Community-
wide &
regional
service
Often placed
around natural
resources &
amenities
• Provide opportunities
to interact with natural
environments &
participate in passive
recreation and ecological
education
• Hammes Park
• Homestead Park
Youth Athletic
Park
10 to 20
acres
Community-
wide;
generally
placed in a
few strategic
locations/sites
Generally
connected to
trails & sidewalks;
vehicle parking
provided
• Provides youth athletic
fields & their associated
facilities
• Can function similarly to a
neighborhood parks
• N/A
Community
Athletic
Park
10 to
25+
acres
Community-
wide;
generally
placed in a
few strategic
locations/sites
Generally
connected to
trails & sidewalks;
vehicle parking
provided
• Provides organized
athletic recreation with
regulation-sized fields &
their associated facilities
• Can function similarly to a
neighborhood park
• N/A
20 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.5 | 2040 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PARK CLASSIFICATIONS MAP
21
EXISTING AMENITIES/FACILITIES
Upon completion of the park system inventory, the
quantitative data collected was consolidated into
a comprehensive inventory chart to provide a more
thorough system-wide review of existing facilities
and amenities and to identify any missing asset
or issues in the system. This table also includes
proposed classifications for each park based on size,
amenities, and use.
TABLE 3.2 | EXISTING PARK AMENITIES + FACILITIES
CITY
PARKS
2040 PARK
CLASSIFICATION
PROPOSED
CLASSIFICATION
ACRES AMENITY
TYPE
Carriage Station Park Neighborhood Neighborhood 2.71
DeMontreville Park Neighborhood Neighborhood 6.33
DeMontreville
Wildlife Park Community Natural Area 23.48
Firefly Park *Neighborhood 0.55
Goose Lake Park Neighborhood Community 7.10
Hammes Park NRPA **Neighborhood 1.93
Heights Park Neighborhood Natural Area 6.60
Heritage Park Neighborhood Natural Area 13.65
Hidden Knoll Park *Neighborhood 6.37
Homestead Park NRPA **Natural Area 2.70
Ivywood Park Neighborhood Community 12.11
Kleis Park Neighborhood Neighborhood 6.94
Lake Jane Hill Park Neighborhood Natural Area 6.33
Lions Park Neighborhood Community 3.36
Legion Ave N Park *Natural Area 6.10
Pebble Park Neighborhood Community 19.20
Pilot Park *Neighborhood 1.36
Reid Park Neighborhood Community 61.57
Ridge Park Neighborhood Neighborhood 23.47
Stonegate Park Neighborhood Community 6.04
Sunfish Lake Park Community Special Use 278.26
Tablyn Park Neighborhood Community 8.62
Tana Ridge Park Neighborhood Neighborhood 9.18
VFW Park Neighborhood Community Athletic 3.23
Ba
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
(
R
e
c
r
e
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
)
Ba
l
l
f
i
e
l
d
s
(
C
o
m
p
e
t
i
t
i
v
e
)
Ba
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
(
F
u
l
l
-
C
o
u
r
t
)
Ba
s
k
e
t
b
a
l
l
(
H
a
l
f
-
C
o
u
r
t
)
Bi
k
e
R
a
c
k
s
/
R
e
p
a
i
r
S
t
a
t
i
o
n
Bi
k
i
n
g
/
W
a
l
k
i
n
g
T
r
a
i
l
s
Gr
i
l
l
Ga
g
a
B
a
l
l
Fi
s
h
i
n
g
P
i
e
r
Ic
e
S
k
a
t
i
n
g
/
H
o
c
k
e
y
R
i
n
k
Ki
o
s
k
(
I
n
t
e
r
p
r
e
t
i
v
e
/
E
d
u
c
a
t
i
o
n
a
l
)
On
-
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Mu
l
t
i
-
U
s
e
F
i
e
l
d
Sh
e
l
t
e
r
Pa
r
k
E
n
t
r
y
S
i
g
n
a
g
e
Pe
r
m
a
n
e
n
t
R
e
s
t
r
o
o
m
s
Pi
c
k
l
e
b
a
l
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
Pi
c
n
i
c
T
a
b
l
e
s
Pl
a
y
g
r
o
u
n
d
s
Po
r
t
a
b
l
e
T
o
i
l
e
t
s
Sl
e
d
d
i
n
g
H
i
l
l
Te
n
n
i
s
C
o
u
r
t
s
Vo
l
l
e
y
b
a
l
l
C
o
u
r
t
s
Wa
r
m
i
n
g
H
o
u
s
e
Totals
(# of parks w/ amenity/facility)517.2 8 2 2 3 2 22 1 1 4 1 1 11 16 20 2 3 14 13 15 5 3 2 1 1
* not explicitly classified/named in the 2040 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan
** Natural Resource Protection Area
22 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.6 | PROPOSED PARK CLASSIFICATIONS MAP
23
EXISTING PROGRAMMING
COMMUNITY PROGRAMMING + EDUCATION OPPORTUNITIES
Lake Elmo offers a variety of recreational facilities
and amenities in their park system, but the city has
limited staff and lacks a recreation programming
department to assist in facilitating programmed
events and opportunities. In the future, the city
should consider developing a programming
coordinator position to get the ball rolling on a
programming to help activate Lake Elmo parks.
The Stillwater Area Public Schools Community
Education organization offers Lake Elmo residents
of all ages, including infants, children, teens,
parents, adults, and seniors, opportunities to
recreate, socialize, and get involved locally. Some of
their offerings for this spring and summer include
(but are not limited to):
• 50 adult classes for activities like strength and
conditioning, golf skills, pickleball and tennis
lessons, kayaking lessons, bird watching, social
media use, etc.
• 129 youth classes and camps for activities like
golf, cheer, ninja/parkour, sports, architecture
and design, art, theater, etc.
• 23 early childhood family education classes
Washington County also offers a variety of programs
and events for folks in Lake Elmo to engage in.
Some of these events and programs include bird
hikes, dog days in the ravine, yoga in the park,
learning to bike, forest bathing, and more. Many of
these activities occur in Lake Elmo Park Reserve,
which is situated in the heart of the city and easy
for residents of Lake Elmo to access.
Figure 3.3: Early childhood family education activities are
offered through Stillwater Area Public School Community Ed
Figure 3.4: Community theater opportunities through the
SAPSCE organization are often sought after by the youth
Figure 3.5: Washington County hosts county-wide
events (like yoga in the park) at Lake Elmo Regional Park
throughout the summer
24 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
NRPA AGENCY BENCHMARKS
MILES OF TRAILS
LOCAL
49 mi.
WASHINGTON CO.
33 mi.
ACRES OF PARKLAND PER 1,000 RESIDENTS
OPERATING EXPENDITURES PER ACRE OF
PARK & RECREATION SPACE
OPERATING EXPENDITURES
PER RESIDENT
82
37.1
$833.27
$31.93
PARK AND RECREATION AGENCY BENCHMARKS
To support the wide range of needs, interests
and lifestyles of park and trail users in their
communities, park and recreation agencies
must offer a variety of facilities, amenities, and
programming opportunities. This requires the right
amount of staff to support the development and
continued maintenance of those facilities and
amenities.
In the 2024 NRPA Agency Performance Review
report, a number of top-line findings pertaining to
park facilities, programming, the responsibilities
of park and recreation agencies, staffing, budget,
agency funding, and policies are described. Some
highlights from those top-line findings are shown
to the right. The table on the next page provides a
brief overview of various NRPA agency benchmarks
and compares the typical U.S. park and recreation
agency to Lake Elmo. A few key takeaways from the
table include:
• In terms of the number of parks, park acreage,
trail mileage, and acres of parkland per 1,000
residents, Lake Elmo is well above the typical
park and recreation agency
• Lake Elmo has very limited park and recreation
agency staffing and therefore has fewer full-
time staff members per 10,000 residents than is
typical; more staff is needed to accommodate an
ever expanding city and park and trail system
• Lake Elmo spends much less in operating
expenditures than the typical park and
recreation agency; annual operating
expenditures are also much lower than the
typical agency
RESIDENTS PER PARK
573
25
TABLE 3.3 | PARK AND RECREATION AGENCY BENCHMARKS*
NRPA BENCHMARK ALL PARK AND
RECREATION AGENCIES
(MEDIAN)
PARK AND RECREATION
AGENCIES LESS THAN
20,000 (MEDIAN)
LAKE ELMO
PARK FACILITIES
Residents per park 2,386 residents 1,172 residents 573 residents
Acres of parkland per 1,000
residents
10.6 acres 12.6 acres 37.1 acres
Miles of trails 16 miles 4.5 miles 82 miles
STAFFING
Park and recreation full-
time employees per 10,000
residents
8.9 employees 13.7 employees 2 employees
BUDGET
Annual operating expenditures $6,453,357 $1,451,763 $431,038
Annual operating expenditures
per resident
$99.47 $135.53 $31.93
Operating expenditures per
acre of park and recreation
space
$8,260 $9,777 $833.27
Annual operating expenditures
per full-time employee
$110,912 $101,304 $215,519
Typical percentage of
operating expenditures for
staffing
54% N/A 30%
AGENCY FUNDING
Operating expenditures
derived from general fund tax
support
62%N/A 30%
Annual revenue generated
from each resident
$22.58 $47.71 $31.85
Five-year capital budget
spending
$12 million $1,814,000 $2 million ($400k a year)
Targets for capital
expenditures
88% for improvements
7% for acquisition
N/A 80% for renovation
20% for new development
POLICIES
Park and recreation agencies
that ban tobacco products at
their parks and facilities
4 in 5 (80%)N/A 0% (Lake Elmo
bans alcohol and
cannabanoids use in
parks)
Agencies with a commitment
to diversity, equity and
inclusion expressed in their
foundational documents (e.g.,
vision, mission and strategic
plan documents)
77%N/A 100%
* derived from the 2024 NRPA Agency Performance Review
26 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
RECREATION FACILITY SERVICE
STANDARDS
The recreation facility service standards in the
following pages identify a minimum level of service
needed for convenient access to recreation facilities
in Lake Elmo. The following standards also list the
minimum number of facilities recommended in the
community (per population), the recommended
service area of each of the facilities, the target
range/recommended quantity of each facility
type, the current facility numbers in Lake Elmo,
the excess or deficit of each facility based on
the target range, and any notes that provide
additional information. In general, Lake Elmo lacks
indoor recreation facilities (e.g., aquatic centers,
community centers, indoor ice rinks, senior centers,
FACILITY MIN. NUMBER
PER POPULATION
SERVICE
AREA
TARGET
RANGE
CURRENT
NUMBER
EXCESS/
DEFICIT
NOTES
INDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES
Aquatics
Centers
1 per 10,000 to
12,000 Entire city 1 aquatic
center 0 -1
• Stillwater Courage
Center, nearby
YMCAs, Foss Swim
School
Community
Centers 1 per 10,000 Entire city 1 community
center 0 -1
• City Hall provides
some room rental
space
Indoor Ice
Rinks 1 per 8,000 Entire city 1 indoor ice
rink 0 -1
• St. Croix Valley Rec
Center, Lily Lake in
Stillwater, St. Mary’s
Point
Nature
Centers 1 per 10,000 Entire city 1 nature
center 1 0
• Sally Manzara
Interpretive Nature
Center in Sunfish
Lake Park
Senior
Centers 1 per 14,000 Entire city 1 senior
center 0 -1
• Courage Center in
Stillwater offers
many senior
programs
SERVICE AREA +
FACILITY GUIDELINES
etc.), although a number of indoor recreation
facilities are located in nearby communities, like
Stillwater and Oak Park Heights. On the other hand,
there are a number of outdoor recreation facilities
in Lake Elmo for folks to utilize. The community
does lack specialized facilities such as a splash pad,
outdoor swimming pool, and skate park.
A NOTE ABOUT SCHOOL FACILITIES
Throughout this plan, school facilities such as
playgrounds, ballfields, soccer fields, etc., have
been excluded from service and distribution / gap
analysis (with the exception of tennis courts at Oak-
Land Middle School, as the city has a joint powers
agreement with Stillwater Area Public Schools for
shared use and maintenance). This is not to say
residents don’t use school facilities, but as the city
does not own them they have not been included as
assets in the plan.
TABLE 3.4 | RECREATION FACILITY SERVICE STANDARDS
27
TABLE 3.4 CONT. | RECREATION FACILITY SERVICE STANDARDS
FACILITY MIN. NUMBER
PER POPULATION
SERVICE
AREA
TARGET
RANGE
CURRENT
NUMBER
EXCESS/
DEFICIT
NOTES
OUTDOOR RECREATION FACILITIES
Alternative
Sports
Facilities
N/A Entire city N/A 0 0
• Bielenburg Sports
Center in Woodbury,
St. Croix Valley Rec
Center in Stillwater
Ballfields
Recreational
1 per city + 1 per
2,500 to 5,000
1-2 miles 6-7 fields 8 fields 1-2+
• Stonegate Park,
Pebble Park, Kleis
Park, DeMontreville
Park, Tana Ridge
Park, Reid Park,
Ridge Park, and
Tablyn Park
Youth Baseball
(ages 9-15)
1 per city + 1 per
2,500 to 5,000
10-15 min.4-6 fields 2 fields -2 to 4
• VFW Park and Lions
Park (includes
backstop, outfield,
fencing, turf infield,
and pitching mound)
Full-size Baseball
(ages 16+)
1 per city + 1 per
5,000 to 10,000
10-15 min.2-3 fields 0 -2 to 3
• Includes minimum
of 325’ from home
plate to outfield
fence, backstop,
outfield, fencing,
turf infield, and
pitching mound
Amateur/Townball
Baseball
N/A
Entire city 1 0 -1
• Town ballfields
typically have
concessions, lights
for evening play and
a minimum of 325’
from home plate to
outfield fence
Basketball
(Outdoor)
Full-court
1 per 5,000
Half-size
1 per 3,000
1/2 to 1
mile
Full-court
2-3 courts
Half-court
4-5 courts
Full-court
2 courts
Half-court
2 courts
Full-court
0
Half-court
-2
• Carriage Station Park
and DeMontreville
Park
Community
Gardens 1 per 7,000 to 9,000 Entire city 1-2 gardens 0 -1
• Valley Outreach in
Stillwater, Cimmaron
Mobile Home Park
(private), private
area kitty-corner
from City Hall (11343
39th St N), private
area near Sunfish
Lake Park
Golf Course
(18-hole)1 per 10,000 Entire city 1 18-hole golf
course 2 +1
• Cimarron and Royal
in Lake Elmo
• Oak Marsh in
Oakdale, Stone
Ridge in Stillwater,
Applewood Hills and
Indian Hills in Grant
28 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
Outdoor Ice
Rinks 1 per 5,000 to 10,000 10-15 min.2-3 rinks 1 -1
• Lions Park
• Brekke Park in
Oak Park Heights,
Croixwood in
Stillwater, St. Croix
Valley Rec Center in
Stillwater
Multi-Use
Fields 1 per 4,000 1-2 miles 3-4 fields 11 +7
• DeMontreville Park,
Tana Ridge Park,
Tablyn Park, Pebble
Park, Reid Park,
Ridge Park
• Fields intended for
soccer, football,
lacrosse, ultimate
frisbee, etc.
Off-leash dog
parks/exercise
areas
1 per 10,000 to
12,000 10-15 min.1 dog park/
exercise area 1 0
• Rice Creek in
Shoreview, Battle
Creek in Woodbury,
Andy’s Bark Park
in Woodbury, Bald
Eagle-Otter Park in
White Bear Lake,
Hudson
Pickleball 1 per 2,000 to 4,000 10-15 min.3-6 courts 13 +7
• Ivywood Park, Lions
Park, Pebble Park,
Tablyn Park
Playgrounds 1 per 2,000 10-15 min.5-7
playgrounds 13 +6
• 13 city-owned
playgrounds in park
system
Skate Park 1 per 10,000 to
12,000 Entire city 1 skate park 0 -1
• St. Croix Valley Rec
Center has a skate
park nearby
Sledding Hills N/A Entire city N/A 2 +2
• Tablyn Park, Green
Acres snow tubing,
informal sledding at
Carriage Station Park
Swimming
Pool (Outdoor)1 per 10,000 Entire city 1 swimming
pool 0 -1
• Lake Elmo Park
Reserve has a
swimming pond
Tennis 1 per 2,000 to 4,000 1 mile 3-6 courts 6 0
• Some to be replaced
with pickleball
courts
• The city has a joint
powers agreement
with Stillwater Area
Public Schools at
Oak-Land Middle
School where 6
courts are available
to the public
Volleyball 1 per 7,500 to 15,000 2 miles 1 court 1 0 • Lions Park
TABLE 3.4 CONT. | RECREATION FACILITY SERVICE STANDARDS
29
The following pages contain a
number of maps and engagement
summaries that the planning team
used to better understand the
distribution of park and recreation
elements in Lake Elmo. These
maps, along with community
input and stakeholder feedback,
helped to identify missing links
and community needs in the city’s
park and trail system. Additional
maps, as well as a complete set of
survey results, can be found in the
appendix of this document.
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! !
! !! ! !
! ! !! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !
Oakdale
In
w
o
o
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
N
o
r
t
h
10th Street North
5th Street North
Ea
g
l
e
P
o
i
n
t
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
LakeOlson
Lake Jane
LakeElmo
Su
n
f
i
s
h
L
a
k
e
Ea
g
l
e
Po
i
n
t
L
a
k
e
DownsLake
0 1800 3600 5400 7200 Ft ´
Future Land Use Map
2040 Future
Land Use
Map Date: Jan 2024 Planned Roadway (Parkway)MUSA Boundary
C
Closed Landfill
Institutional
ParkBP
LB
V-HDR
V-MU
PSP
ROW
AP
RAD
RSF
RSFS
GC
LDR
MDR
HDR
MU-BP
MU-C
V-LDR
V-MDR
Lake
DeMontreville
Lake Jane
Lake
Olson
Sunfish
Lake
Lake Elmo Downs
Lake
Horseshoe
Lake
Rose
LakeGoose
Lake
Eagle Point
Lake
30 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.6 | 2040 FUTURE LAND USE MAP
31
FIGURE 3.7 | PLATTED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT MAP
32 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.8 | NEIGHBORHOOD PARK GAP MAP
33
FIGURE 3.9 | COMMUNITY PARK GAP MAP
34 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.10 | REGIONAL PARK ACCESS MAP
35
FIGURE 3.11 | NATURAL RESOURCE PROTECTION AREA GAP MAP
36 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
FIGURE 3.12 | PLAYGROUND GAP MAP
37
FIGURE 3.13 | ALL PARK DISTRIBUTION AND GAP ANALYSIS MAP
38 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
COORDINATION WITH CITY STAFF AND
THE ADVISORY COMMITTEE
With an invigorated interest in completing a park
system plan to help guide the future of their parks,
trails and open spaces, the city decided to prioritize
the development of this report in 2023. Throughout
the planning process, the planning team has worked
closely with city staff and a number of Advisory
Committee members in the overall development of
the plan, as they have been able to provide local
expertise on the park and trail system, highlight
potential deficiencies, and guide outcomes of the
project (in conjunction with input collected through
public engagement). There were several meetings
with members of city staff during the development
of this plan and four meetings with the Advisory
Committee. These meetings focused on topics
ranging from existing conditions in the parks to
potential improvement recommendations for
improvement.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT EVENTS
During the development of this plan, the planning
team hosted two in-person engagement events:
Light Up Lake Elmo and the Arbor Day Tree
Giveaway. Light Up Lake Elmo is an annual event
and gathering downtown where community
members can engage in winter activities, meet
Mr. and Mrs. Claus, and take part in a tree lighting
ceremony. The Arbor Day Tree Giveaway event
also occurs annually. It provides residents with
an opportunity to pick up a tree sapling they can
take home and plant in appreciation of Arbor
Day. Both events were a success, with many
stopping by to provide feedback on the plan and its
recommendations. Key findings from those events
are included in the following two pages.
PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT SUMMARY
COMMUNITY SURVEY OVERVIEW
The planning team launched the community survey
to residents of Lake Elmo in December of 2023. The
survey was live for approximately four months and
was accessible online through a shareable web link.
While the survey was live, city staff, the Advisory
Committee, and the planning team spread the
word throughout Lake Elmo. In the end, over 500
participants provided input through the community
survey.
The following pages provide a summary of the
community input received from the community
survey and various in-person engagement events. A
full report of results from the survey can be found in
the appendix of this plan.
ENGAGEMENT AT A GLANCE
553
2
HUNDREDS
SURVEY RESPONSES
IN-PERSON POP-UP EVENTS
OF WRITTEN COMMENTS
39
Early in the planning process, the Advisory
Committee was asked to assist in developing a
visual SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities,
Threats) Analysis. The findings from that exercise
STRENGTHS
OPPORTUNITIES
WEAKNESSES
THREATS
»Excellent culture around parks and nature
»County and state partnerships
»Many park, facility and activity options, especially
for a smaller town
»Considerable acreage for well-used parks
»City is not entirely developed (there is open space
for further park + trail development)
»Sunfish Lake Park - a 280 acre natural park that
provides a great nature experience
»Lake Elmo Park Reserve (Washington County)
»Tranquil feel in neighborhood and community
parks
»Open acreage for additional parks and natural
spaces (if the city decides)
»Dedicated volunteers interested in preserving and
helping manage parks + trails
»Demographic changes (e.g., population, age, race)
in the community
»Park dedication
»City provides varying housing options that bring a
variety of new residents to town
»Partnerships for programming
»Aquatics Center
»Outdoor water fund
»Many open, flex fields in the community that
could become dedicated athletic fields
»Lack of conservation of natural open areas
»Many areas impacted by invasive species
»No indoor play facilities or water features
»Funding model is developer-driven
»Lack of trail connectivity in some areas; trail
connections can be confusing for newcomers
»Not all trails accessible throughout the year
»Lack of city resources dedicated to parks; no
dedicated parks department
»Existing youth athletic fields need expansion
improvements in order to address capacity issues
»City gathering space for events is missing
»No true sports complex
»Lack of recreational programming
»Lake Elmo Park Reserve
»Development
»Over-development - do developers have the best
interest of the residents in mind?
»Misperception of Lake Elmo Park Reserve as a city
asset
»Misperception that parks are superfluous or not
important
»Climate change, invasive species and natural
resource degradation
»Public park space being treated as privately-
owned open space
»Continued operation and maintenance of parks
for the next 15 to 20 years
»One time-funding vs. continued revenue needed
to run parks
SWOT ANALYSIS
are listed below. These findings were strongly
supported by community feedback both in the
survey and at engagement events. Key takeaways
from the exercise include:
40 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
POP-UP EVENTS
LIGHT UP LAKE ELMO
VISIONING BOARD EXERCISE
WHAT DO YOU ENVISION FOR THE FUTURE OF
LAKE ELMO PARK SYSTEM? (35 TOTAL COMMENTS)
ACTIVITIES, AMENITIES AND PRIORITIES
EXERCISE
WHAT ACTIVITIES AND AMENITIES DO YOU
MOST ENJOY ENGAGING IN AT LAKE ELMO
PARKS? WHAT PROGRAMMING SHOULD THE CITY
PRIORITIZE IN THE FUTURE? (304 TOTAL VOTES)
»Redesign/Repair the rusty fasteners at Pebble
Park
»Access to library and post office from north side
is treacherous at best. We need a safe way to
cross Stillwater Blvd
»Continue sidewalk on Stillwater Blvd from 39th
St to Laverne Ave N (or Lake Elmo Ave N)
»Need better/safer CR 14 and CR 17 pedestrian
crossings
»Need path from Goose Lake Park to Lake Elmo
Park Reserve
»Develop a snow removal plan to reduce
confusion in the community
»Year-round trail maintenance
»Greater interconnectivity of walking and multi-
use trails
»Playgrounds = 53 respondents
»Swimming = 52 respondents
»Walking/Running = 33 respondents
»Fishing = 31 respondents
»Informal Sports/Pick-Up Games = 28
»Organized Sports = 28
»Non-Motorized Water Activities = 20
»Dog Walking = 19
»Shelters = 15
»Relaxing = 14
»Picnic/Grilling = 11
Figure 3.6: Engagement with community members at the 2024 Light Up Lake Elmo pop-up event
41
ARBOR DAY TREE GIVEAWAY
KEY FINDINGS FROM ENGAGEMENT
»Developing Lions Park as Lake Elmo’s destination
community park should be a high priority for the
city
»There is some resistance to adding new
amenities and features to parks because of their
impact on natural resources/wild spaces
»Community members would like greater access
to water-based recreational activities
»Implementing a snow removal plan for trails
in the city would help reduce confusion among
community members during winter months
»The community is concerned about the proactive
management of invasive species in the
preserves and parks; determining efforts needed
for management, monitoring, funding, and
control are of high priority
»Addressing trail gaps and unsafe pedestrian
crossings is of the utmost importance, especially
around schools and other community centers
Figure 3.7: Interactive recommendation boards (Top); Engagement with community members at the 2024 Arbor Day Tree
Giveaway pop-up event (Bottom)
42 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
SURVEY RESPONDENTS
AT A GLANCE
AGE GROUPS PRESENT IN
RESPONDENT HOUSEHOLDS
0–2
3–6
7–12
13–18
19–24
35–43
44–50
25–34
51–65
66+
HOW LONG HAVEYOU BEEN A RESIDENT?
<1 year
1–5 years
6–10 years
10+ years
Of respondents believe parks, trails and open
spaces are VERY important to overall quality of
life.
86%
Of respondents are residents of Lake Elmo.
Respondents from other communities include
Afton, Bayport, Lakeland, Oakdale, Stillwater,
Woodbury and more!
88%
553!Total Responses
40%32%
6%
22%
PARKS VISITED MOST
OFTEN BY RESPONDENTS
1 2Sunfish
Lake Park
Lions
Park
COMMUNITY SURVEY FINDINGS
SEE APPENDIX FOR FULL SURVEY
43
0–2
3–6
51–65
3 Reid
Park 4 5Pebble
Park
Carriage
Station
Park
HOW OFTEN PEOPLE
VISIT CITY PARKS OR TRAILS Most participated in activities and
events at parks
Other common activities include:
1st
Using walking &
running trails
Informal sports
(pick-up games)
5th
49%
32%
18%
1%
At least once a week
Once a month
Daily
Never
2nd
Using park
playgrounds
3rd
Dog walking
4th
Organized sports
teams/leagues
• Bike riding
• Bird watching
• Relaxing
• Picnic/Grilling
81.7% (89 out of 109 respondents)
72.9% (54 out of 74 respondents)
Baseball/Softball
Pickleball
Top organized sports participation
Top informal sports participation
Proximity to work/home Sidewalks/Walkable access
to parks
Type of equipment/facilities
available
75%34%38%
Why are some parks visited more than others?
44 | EXISTING CONDITIONS + NEEDS
Other popular priorities:
TOP 5 PRIORITIES FOR THE CITY TO FOCUS ON IMPROVING
Additional
Seasonal Use
Facilities
Inclusive
Playground
Equipment
Additional/New
Walking
Trails
Creation of
Multi-use
Courts
Added Dog Park
Facilities
• Fitness/Health Stations
• Flat lawn/multi-use recreational spaces
• Baseball/Softball fields
• Wayfinding signage
USED VS IDEAL METHOD OF TRAVEL TO PARKS
Walk/Run Bike Drive Other
USED 7%39%
54%
<1%IDEAL 2%47%
24%
27%
TOP 3 COLD MONTH ACTIVITIES
Sledding Ice Skating Snowshoeing
45
This page has been left intentionally blank.
46 Figure 3.1: Natural vegetation in Sunfish Lake Park
47
0303
VISION & GUIDING VISION & GUIDING
PRINCIPLESPRINCIPLES
Although the community developed a city-wide vision statement in the 2040
Comprehensive Plan, it was not entirely specific to Lake Elmo’s park and trail
system. To ensure the long-term success of this park system plan, the planning
team engaged with a variety of stakeholders to develop an updated vision
statement - a statement that can be adapted over time to more accurately
reflect the community’s needs and aspirations for their park and trail system -
as well as several guiding principles and values.
The vision statement and guiding principles in this section of the report are
meant to serve as a guiding framework for the successful development and
management of Lake Elmo’s park and trail system. As the community’s needs
related to parks, trails, and open spaces evolve, the city should reflect on
this vision statement and set of guiding principles and make adjustments as
needed.
48 | VISION + GUIDING PRINCIPLES
VISION STATEMENT
It’s no secret that the urbanization of some
areas in Lake Elmo is happening and has
accelerated over the years. With a massive
boom in growth over the past decade,
preserving and improving Lake Elmo’s park
and trail system is of the utmost importance.
While the city has adequately maintained park
facilities and amenities thus far, they will need
to adapt their offerings and increase staff
support to satisfy the needs of residents in the
future.
In order to best plan for the future of Lake
Elmo’s park and trail system, the planning team
collaborated with a number of stakeholders,
including city staff, Advisory Committee
members, and the general public to develop a
unified community vision statement. It reads:
THE VISION
LAKE ELMO’S PARKS, TRAILS, AND
OPEN SPACES SHALL PROVIDE
CONVENIENT ACCESS TO A WIDE RANGE
OF OPPORTUNITIES FOR ALL RESIDENTS
TO RECREATE AND CONNECT.
49
GUIDING PRINCIPLES
Similarly, collaboration with city staff, the
Advisory Committee, and the community led to
the creation of four guiding principles specific
to Lake Elmo’s parks, trails, and open spaces.
These guiding principles provide an overarching
framework to help inform the development of
the goals, policies, and initiatives found in the
recommendations section of this report. During
the planning process, they helped define the
actions that should be taken to achieve the
vision for Lake Elmo’s park and trail system.
Guiding principles for this plan include:
THE GUIDING PRINCIPLES
1
2
3
4
CONNECT
This plan should connect the community to
parks, trails, open spaces, nature, reliable
information, and each other, as well as
strengthen relationships to the outdoors
and healthy lifestyles
GROW This plan should enhance and improve Lake
Elmo’s existing assets, as well as provide
room for future growth of the park and trail
system
This plan should provide guidance and
recommendations that are implementable,
maintainable, and sustainable.
This plan should assist the city in adapting
to ever-changing trends in park and
recreation, as well as Lake Elmo’s rapidly
growing population
MAINTAIN
ADAPT
Figure 4.2: Scenic field of native plants in Lake Elmo
50 Figure 4.1: Trail segment in DeMontreville Wildlife Park
51
With changes in demographics, technologies, and social and recreational
trends, Lake Elmo city staff and other decision makers will need to consider
how park and recreation facility and programming needs will be met as the
future unfolds. After all, park and recreation trends are ever-changing, can vary
by region or climate, and are often impacted by social influences. In order to
better adapt to future demands, city staff will need to be nimble and flexible in
response to the ever-changing needs and desires of the public.
This section of the report explores a handful of park and recreation-related
trends (listed in no particular order) and their potential implications for the
future of Lake Elmo’s parks and trail system.
0404
TRENDS ANALYSISTRENDS ANALYSIS
52 | TRENDS ANALYSIS
According to recent U.S. Census data, Lake Elmo
is one of the fastest-growing cities in the Twin
Cities metropolitan area. In fact, Lake Elmo has the
potential to double in population in less than six
years if it continues to grow at its current rate.
With this large and continuous influx of new
community members, the city has both a challenge
and an opportunity to adapt and grow with
its residents. Understanding emerging social,
recreational, and demographic trends is critical to
best support current and future residents.
OVERVIEW OF TRENDS
In the following pages, several trends are
highlighted. They include:
»The Impacts of Climate Change
»Shifts in the Workplace
»Technology in the Park System
»Dog Ownership
»Pickleball + Cricket
»A Rise in Non-Traditional Recreation
»Inclusivity + Accessibility
»Other Emerging Trends in Programming
»Increased Need for Partnerships with
Local Schools
Figure 2.2: Children’s nature play area at Pebble Park
53
STATISTICS
TREND 1
THE IMPACTS OF CLIMATE CHANGE
Unfortunately, climate change has already started
to have and impact on parks, trails, and other
recreational environments. Heatwaves, droughts,
floods, and other extreme weather events have
become more frequent in the last decade, impacting
not only the landscape but also the enjoyability
of parks, trails and open spaces. In coming years,
communities must develop strategies to adapt
and evolve to the changing conditions the world is
facing.
Implementing green infrastructure (e.g., rain
gardens, permeable pavements, bioswales, etc.),
preserving, protecting and expanding natural
resources, and integrating climate resilience into
park planning and management are just a few ways
to counteract the impacts climate change is having
on our health and well-being.
75%
40%
6 out of 10
of Americans believe that climate change will cause
significant environmental harm
of Americans believe that climate change will directly affect
their communities and outdoor spaces
Americans believe that rising sea levels will cause migration
away from coastal areas
Figure 2.3: Carbon dioxide contributes to
climate change
Source: “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation for 2024” -
National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.4: Wildfires have become an
increasing concern in wooded areas
Figure 2.5: The frequency of flood events
has significantly increased in recent years
54 | TRENDS ANALYSIS
TREND 2
SHIFTS IN THE WORKPLACE
Since the COVID-19 pandemic began in early 2020,
the workplace has shifted quite substantially. As
communities around the world went on lock-down,
a large portion of the workforce began working
from home. As a way to get outdoors and engage
in physical activity while still adhering to social
distancing guidelines, many community members
turned to their city’s parks, trails and open spaces to
recreate, and continue to do so post-pandemic.
Many workers have reallocated the time they
spent commuting to activities that enhance their
wellbeing and leisure time, including walking,
biking, and outdoor recreation.
STATISTICS
90%
65%
81%
of younger workers support flexible work options
of employees want to continue to work from home despite
the firm employer conviction to bring employees back to
the office
of the full-time workforce supports a four-day work week
Source: “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation for 2024” -
National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.6: Hybrid work environments allow
for some much-needed flexibility
Figure 2.7: Traffic congestion
Figure 2.8: Park users enjoying a day off
55
STATISTICS
TREND 3
TECHNOLOGY IN THE PARK SYSTEM
Technological innovation, including the use of
artificial intelligence, has already had a large
impact on the park and recreation industry in recent
years. For example, advancements to AI chatbots,
AI algorithms, and AI-assisted analytics have
allowed park and recreation staff to more quickly
respond to shifts in park usage and public demand
for informations, more efficiently process data to
make operations and maintenance decisions and
predictions, and more accurately monitor community
safety and security.
Location analytics companies such as StreetLight can
analyze geolocated devices without compromising
privacy, therefore providing park and recreation
agencies with more detailed information about their
community members’ interactions with the park
system.
$200,000,000,000
25
Current value of the market for data brokers collecting and
selling location-based and personal information
Amount of apps recording and tracking location on the
average smartphone
Source: https://time.com/6209991/apps-collecting-personal-
data/
Figure 2.9: Electronic and interactive
wayfinding kiosks provide helpful
information to park users
Figure 2.10: A park’s “social media appeal”
has become increasingly important to
young park users
56 | TRENDS ANALYSIS
TREND 4
DOG OWNERSHIP
During the COVID-19 pandemic, dog ownership in the
U.S. surged. Since then, love for dogs hasn’t changed
a bit; in fact, dog parks remain the fastest-growing
type of park, while off-leash dog parks are the
fastest-growing type of dog park.
In coming years, parks and recreation agencies
should consider adding dog-related facilities and
amenities in their communities.
45%
dog parks
85%
of all families currently own a dog
Fastest-growing type of park
of dog-owning families consider their dogs to be members
of the family
STATISTICS
Source: “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation for 2024” -
National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.11: Off-leash dogs in a park
Figure 2.12: A dog-owner on a walk
Figure 2.13: A dog enjoying a run
57
STATISTICS
TREND 5
PICKLEBALL
As the fastest-growing recreational sport in
the nation, pickleball can be found in many
communities across the country. Pickleball is
enjoyable for a variety of reasons: it’s inclusive to
people of all ages, provides a healthy and active way
to recreate socially, and boosts mood and mental
health.
However, there are concerns over the noise that
comes from pickleball courts. These concerns have
prompted many park and recreation agencies to
reconsider where to site new pickleball courts.
Demand for new courts may warrant the conversion
of underutilized tennis courts to pickleball courts.
pickleball
600 feet + under 40 dB
up to 50%
The fastest-growing recreational sport in the nation
Recommended distance pickleball courts should be placed
from a home + recommended level noise should be under
Amount of noise reduction to paddles and balls when using
sound-deadening equipment
Source: “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation for 2024” -
National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.15: Pickleball can be quite noisy
Figure 2.16: Tennis courts can be easily
converted to accommodate pickleball
Figure 2.14: Community members playing
pickleball
58 | TRENDS ANALYSIS
TREND 6
A RISE IN NON-TRADITIONAL RECREATION
Recreation trends generally shift based on societal
changes and preferences over time. In recent
years, there has been a rise in non-traditional and
informal recreation in parks, trails, and open spaces
across the country. Often times, non-traditional and
informal activities are more inclusive and appeal
to a wider range of people, which encourages
participation from folks of all backgrounds and age
groups.
As recreation in parks and trails continues to
become more informal, cities will need to reconsider
their recreational offerings and adjust accordingly.
A few examples of informal recreation include
mountain biking, hiking, horseback riding, disc golf,
dancing, geocaching, pickleball, skateboarding, and
seasonal/holiday-themed sports.
from 45% to 38%
Percentage by which the restriction imposed by the
pandemic reduced participation in youth sports (2018)
4 in 5
91%
Urban park and recreation agencies partner with local schools
to coordinate efforts that connect youth to nature (e.g.,
through coordinated after-school programs, nature-based
field trips, and formal and informal shared usage agreements
that transform schoolyards into publicly accessible spaces
where children can play outside of school hours)
of U.S. adults seek park-centered entertainment and social
events that allow them to mix and mingle with others
STATISTICS
Sources: “Parks and Recreation is Essential” - National Recreation
and Park Association (2023); “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation
for 2024” - National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.17: Mountain bikers navigating an
informal trail
Figure 2.18: Hiking has become an
increasingly popular activity
Figure 2.19: Teens playing ultimate frisbee
59
STATISTICS
TREND 7
INCLUSIVITY + ACCESSIBILITY
Adaptive and inclusive programming in parks and
open spaces is crucial for promoting a diverse
and cohesive community. Prioritizing inclusive
programming creates opportunities for social
interaction and physical activity by catering to
individuals of all abilities and backgrounds. Not only
does embracing diversity in recreational activities
encourage understanding and empathy among
people, it also helps create better-functioning and
healthier community dynamics.
To ensure people of all abilities can participate,
local park and recreation agencies must make
changes to current policies and practices to become
more accessible and inclusive.
90%
1 in 3
81%
of U.S. adults agree it is important that local park and
recreation agencies create and provide recreation
programming that is adaptive and inclusive so persons of
all abilities may participate
Park and recreation agencies offer adaptive/inclusive sports
activities
of U.S. adults want parks and recreation to ensure
inclusivity through policies and practices
Sources: “Parks and Recreation is Essential” - National Recreation
and Park Association (2023); “Top Trends in Parks and Recreation
for 2024” - National Recreation and Park Association (2024)
Figure 2.21: Inclusive and accessible
playground equipment
Figure 2.22: An accessible plaza area for a
person with visual impairments is crucial
Figure 2.20: ADA-accessible ramps help
those with physical impairments
60 | TRENDS ANALYSIS
TREND 8
OTHER EMERGING TRENDS IN PROGRAMMING
With demographics and interests constantly in flux,
programming trends are always shifting. According to
observations from park and recreation agencies around
the country, emerging programming trends include but
are not limited to:
»Family engagement nights
»Season festivals/new seasonal programming
»Outdoor fitness programming
»Programs for older adults
»Programs for teens and young adults
»Partnering with libraries for community events
»Using outdoor spaces for educational purposes
»Developing community gardens
»Incorporating adventure and nature play
44%
Percentage by which community gardens in parks have
increased since 2012 (2022 Trust for Public Land Survey)
ADDITIONAL TRENDS
According to a 2023 survey from recmanagement.com,
programs that saw an increase in participation from last
year included:
»Holidays and other special events (up 6.2%)
»Youth sports teams (up 4.1%)
»Fitness programs (up 3%)
»Educational programs (up 2.2%)
»Festivals and concerts (up 2.2%)
»Programs for active older adults (up 1.4%)
STATISTICS
Source: https://recmanagement.com/articles/153715/trends-
parks-recreation-2023
Figure 2.23: Movies in the Park
Figure 2.24: Trails for residents of all ages
Figure 2.25: Community garden plots
61
STATISTICS
TREND 9
INCREASED NEED FOR PARTNERSHIPS WITH LOCAL SCHOOLS
As budgets are increasingly tight for both
municipalities and school districts in the US, it is
not uncommon for both entities to reduce their
spending on programming, recreation facility
improvements, operations, and maintenance. Often
times, this results in reduced collaboration between
schools and local governments, as both may lack
the capacity and funds to run programs and operate
facilities. Simultaneously, community desire for
safe, accessible, and affordable options for play and
recreation is increasing as populations grow.
To create efficiencies and maximize economical use
of public resources, collaboration between school
districts and cities is important and should be
considered. Clear, formalized joint use agreements
can make resource sharing easier and more
agreeable for both parties.
$360 billion
$60 billion
Lost spending on US K-12 public school funding between
2016 and 2021 as 39 states devote a smaller share of their
economies to funding public schools
deferred maintenance backlog facing local parks in the US
Figure 2.27: Children interacting with school
playground amenities
Figure 2.28: Joint use agreements can lead
to better collaboration between school
districts and cities
Figure 2.26: School amenity use signage
Sources: “Opening School Grounds to the Community After Hours - a
toolkit for increasing physical activity through joint use agreements”
ChangeLab Solutions (www.changelabsolutions.org); American
Federation of Teachers; ASCE’s 2021 Infrastructure Report Card
62 Figure 5.1: Narrow-leaved purple coneflower
63
0505
RECOMMENDATIONSRECOMMENDATIONS
The following recommendations were informed by community input and
engagement, feedback from a variety of stakeholders and city staff, and
an in-depth inventory and analysis of the existing conditions, city context,
and amenities and facilities in Lake Elmo’s parks and trail system. The
following recommendations are meant to provide a comprehensive approach
to preserving, restoring, and enhancing Lake Elmo’s parks, trails and open
spaces. Depending on available funding and partnership opportunities in the
community, it is intended that the following improvements will be phased. The
information provided here is intended for planning and budgeting purposes,
and each project will require additional exploration and design to refine project
scope and cost expectations.
This section of the report dives into recommended improvements for five
aspects of the system: parks, facilities, connectivity, open space and preserves,
and operations and maintenance. Preliminary budgetary costs for specific
actions associated with select initiatives are identified in further detail in the
next section of this report.
64 | RECOMMENDATIONS
OVERVIEW
The following pages provide a set of goals, policies,
and initiatives that the city can follow to improve
their parks, facilities, connectivity, open spaces and
preserves, and operations and maintenance. The
recommendations in this section of the report are
organized in the following way:
Goal = broad statements that describe a
desired outcome and are often long-term
Policy = the general way in which programs
and activities are conducted to achieve
a goal, and reflect underlying values or
principle
Initiative = practices that support policy
statements and may identify the “who, what,
when, where, and how” of achieving a goal or
policy
1. Goal
1.1 Policy
1.1.1 Initiative
Figure 5.2: Playground equipment at Pilot Park
65
PARK RECOMMENDATIONS
1. Provide access to parks for all residents to foster
community connectedness, health, and wellbeing
• 1.1 - Ensure all residents have safe and convenient access to a
great park within a 10 to 15 minute walk from their home (1/2
mile to 3/4 mile radius)
»1.1.1 - Work to fill the park access gap in the southeast and
north central areas of the city when development occurs
»1.1.2 - Plan for future park integration by:
* Adding parks as the community grows
* Requiring the dedication of parkland in strategic locations
that aligns with the long term goals for park size, access
and amenities
* Locating parks with at least one side along a public road
* Planning for the inclusion of off-street parking areas
»1.1.3 - Connect parks to neighborhoods, destinations, and other
parks by adding trail and sidewalk connections that link to a
greater trail network
»1.1.4 - Collaborate with school districts on shared amenities
* Work with Stillwater Area Public Schools on the
partnership at Oak-Land Middle School (including the
tennis courts and the 3.7 acres at the NE corner of the
school property at the SW corner of the intersection of
Manning Ave N. and 10th St N.).
• 1.2 - Provide a distributed network of neighborhood parks that
meet resident’s current and future day-to-day needs
»1.2.1 - Ensure every neighborhood park has a playground or
play feature, a flex field for informal play and recreation, and a
special or distinctive feature to distinguish it from other parks
»1.2.2 - Ensure every neighborhood park has a seating option,
picnic table, bike rack, shade (trees or structure), trash and
recycling receptacles, and park identification sign.
»1.2.3 - Classify Hidden Knoll and Pilot Park as neighborhood
parks, and Reclassify Firefly and Hammes from a Natural
Resource Protection Area to a neighborhood park
• 1.3 - Provide a network of special use parks that provide
residents access to unique features and special places
»1.3.1 - Reclassify Goose Lake Park to special use, providing
visitors with access to Goose Lake
Figure 5.3: The mature oak trees and
forested backdrop at Kleis Park distinguish
it from other neighborhood parks
Figure 5.5: Off-street parking areas in city
parks provide easy and safe access to
park facilities and amenities
Figure 5.4: Public art can be a defining,
functional feature that sets a park apart
66 | RECOMMENDATIONS
»1.3.2 - Reclassify Sunfish Lake Park from community park to
special use
»1.3.3 - Look for opportunities to develop a special use or mini
park in the Old Village, and/or support the private development
of public space in the Old Village
• 1.4 - Provide a network of community parks that provide
residents and visitors a place to gather for special occasions or
use
»1.4.1 - Combine Ivywood and Stonegate Parks into one park,
reclassify the combined park as a community park, and rename
it with a hybrid of Ivywood and Stonegate:
* Develop a long-range plan for this new park, working
with the community to evaluate the addition of off-street
parking and recreational amenities
»1.4.2 - Reclassify Lions Park, Pebble Park, Tablyn Park, and Reid
Park from neighborhood to community park
»1.4.3 - Ensure every community park has a seating option, picnic
table, bike rack, shade (trees or structure), trash and recycling
receptacles, entry signage, informational kiosk, a drinking
fountain, and shelter
»1.4.4 - Develop Lions Park as Lake Elmo’s destination community
park:
* Develop a long-range plan for Lions Park that maximizes
its functionality as a community gathering place for larger
events and strengthens its connection to downtown
* Track opportunities to expand Lions Park
• 1.5 - Provide a network of athletic parks dedicated to meeting the
needs of recreational, league, and tournament play baseball and
softball
»1.5.1 - Reclassify VFW Park from neighborhood to athletic park
and support competitive play here
»1.5.2 - Develop a new athletic park to support baseball and
softball (competitive and town ball for ages 9+)
• 1.6 - Encourage residents to take an active role in the
development of their parks
»1.6.1 - Continue to engage residents and park users in the
planning and design process when updating existing or adding
new parks
»1.6.2 - Support volunteer efforts at parks for/after gatherings,
events, and clean-up days
»1.6.3 - If demand warrants, provide extra amenities at parks
such as portable restrooms and posting boards
Figure 5.6: Pocket parks provide gathering
opportunities in relatively small spaces,
often transforming underutilized areas
into community assets
Figure 5.7: Shelters at community parks
support everyday use and special events
Figure 5.8: Volunteers’ assistance is
essential to keeping the park system
healthy and well-maintained
67
FIGURE 5.9 | PROPOSED PARK CLASSIFICATIONS MAP
68 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FACILITY RECOMMENDATIONS
2. Provide a system of recreational facilities to meet the
active and passive needs of residents
• 2.1 - Provide a mix of recreational activities to meet a wide range
of needs
»2.1.1 - Look to add a special facility to meet the needs of
tweens, teens, and young adults; consider a challenge-course
facility, skate park, or disc golf course
»2.1.2 - Look to provide additional court facilities in the southeast
area of the city; engage with neighbors to determine type of
court (tennis, pickleball, basketball, volleyball, or other)
»2.1.3 - Look to provide additional field space in the southeast
area of the city; engage with neighbors, clubs, and
organizations to determine type and size of field (flex, lacrosse,
football, soccer, etc.)
• 2.2 - Provide places for larger group gatherings by providing
higher amenity shelters at select community parks
»2.2.1 - Look to develop a reservable shelter with potable water,
electrical, and permanent restrooms
• 2.3 - Distribute playgrounds or play features for children of
all ages and abilities throughout the community, taking into
consideration the needs and demographics of the surrounding
neighborhood
»2.3.1 - When replacing or adding new equipment, add play
features designed for the following age ranges:
* 6 to 24 months
* 2 to 5 years
* 5 to 12 years
* Ages 13+
»2.3.2 - When replacing or adding new equipment, incorporate
inclusive play features that are accessible to those using
mobility devices
Figure 5.10: A park challenge course is an
active, fun way to engage tweens, teens,
and young adults
Figure 5.12: Inclusive playgrounds will attract
visitors from the entire community
Figure 5.11: Outdoor volleyball courts are
only available at Lions Park
69
• 2.4 - Provide year-round opportunities for outdoor recreation
»2.4.1 - Look to add winter facilities and activities in the city (e.g.,
ice skating, cross country skiing, etc.)
»2.4.2 - Explore the opportunity to add fire pits into parks where
appropriate, beginning with a pilot site to test success
• 2.5 - Communicate regularly with local organizations,
associations, and clubs to understand their changing needs
• 2.6 - Increase access to water-based recreation opportunities
»2.6.1 - Support the addition of a fishing pier in Sunfish Lake Park
»2.6.2 - Look for opportunities to add boat launches, fishing piers,
and swimming beaches
»2.6.3 - Share and publicize the locations of fishing piers, boat
launches, swimming beaches, and nearby aquatic facilities in
online and paper maps
»2.6.4 - Explore the possibility of partnering with Washington
County to give Lake Elmo residents free access to Lake Elmo
Park Reserve, which has boat launches, a fishing pier, and a
swim pond
Figure 5.13: Cross country skiing
opportunities are currently lacking in the
southeast part of the city
Figure 5.15: Lake Elmo Park Reserve’s swim
pond is the only accessible swimming
beach in the community
Figure 5.14: Fishing piers provide park
visitors with increased access to water-
based recreation opportunities
70 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 5.16 | BALLFIELD DISTRIBUTION MAP
71
FIGURE 5.17 | FIELD DISTRIBUTION MAP
72 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 5.18 | COURT DISTRIBUTION MAP
73
FIGURE 5.19 | PARK AMENITY DISTRIBUTION MAP
74 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 5.20 | PLAYGROUND DISTRIBUTION AND SCHEDULED REPLACEMENT MAP
75
FIGURE 5.21 | WINTER ACTIVITY DISTRIBUTION MAP
76 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 5.22 | WATER ACCESS DISTRIBUTION MAP
This page has been left intentionally blank.
77
78 | RECOMMENDATIONS
CONNECTIVITY
RECOMMENDATIONS
3. Provide a system of trails and sidewalks that connect
neighborhoods, parks, schools, community destinations,
and neighboring communities safely throughout the city to
encourage active living and recreation
• 3.1 - Work to fill existing gaps in the trail system, prioritizing
safety, connectivity, and cost
»3.1.1 - Address gaps identified in the Connectivity
Recommendations + Search Corridors Map
»3.1.2 - Explore additional trail connections to and through the
southeastern and north-central portions of the city (through
easements or land purchases)
»3.1.3 - Prioritize trails that connect to schools, neighborhood
and community parks, and other community destinations to
improve safety for younger populations
• 3.2 - Integrate trail development into the planning and design
process for public improvements and land development
»3.2.1 - Preserve outlots and abandoned or vacated right-of-ways
for future trails
»3.2.2 - Include a parks and trails needs assessment process to
the concept plan review process for land development
• 3.3 - Improve crossing safety at busy roads and intersections near
parks, dense trail networks, and other open spaces
»3.3.1 - Address crossing issues identified in Gap Maps and the
Connectivity Recommendations + Search Corridors Map
»3.3.2 - Support the development and implementation of a
crosswalk marking policy
• 3.4 - Collaborate with partner agencies (e.g., MnDOT, Washington
County, neighboring communities, etc.) to implement new trail
connections, enhance active transportation facilities, and provide
trail opportunities that the city does not currently have
»3.4.1 - Collaborate with Washington County to establish regional
trail connections to existing city trail segments
Figure 5.25: Partnerships with Washington
County and others will further increase
trail connectivity
Figure 5.23: Trail connectivity to
community destinations is important
Figure 5.24: Enhanced pedestrian crossings
are essential at intersections near parks
79
4. Develop a system that is highly accessible and enjoyable
to a diversity of users
• 4.1 - Improve the trail user experience through improved
maintenance, wayfinding, signage, and amenities
»4.1.1 - Incorporate wayfinding signage in strategic locations to
assist users in better understanding locations, destinations,
and distances throughout the system
»4.1.2 - Identify and resolve any trail surfacing issues that make
trails difficult to use
»4.1.3 - Add seating opportunities along trails favored by younger
and older residents
»4.1.4 - Further expand opportunities to tie non-athletic outdoor
activities into the trail system, such as birdwatching and hiking
»4.1.5 - Look for opportunities to collaborate with artists to
implement public art along the trail
»4.1.6 - Add soft surface trails within open space preserves
• 4.2 - Reduce barriers to accessing and enjoying Lake Elmo’s trail
system
»4.2.1 - Implement a snow-removal plan for trails
»4.2.2 - Ensure there is safe, accessible, and nearby trail
access to senior citizen centers and multi-family housing
developments
»4.2.3 - Explore opportunities to pilot a mobility-device charging
station at a key trail connection location
»4.2.4 - Look for opportunities to develop trail loops of different
lengths throughout the community and in certain strategically
chosen parks
»4.2.5 - Increase awareness and understanding of the trail
system by developing and publicizing online and paper trail
maps
»4.2.6 - Explore opportunities to develop trailheads
• 4.3 - Integrate opportunities for gathering along/near trails to
promote social experiences for trail users
»4.3.1 - Create informal gathering spaces (with benches/seating
and litter receptacles) at major trail intersections where room
allows
Figure 5.26: Wayfinding signage kiosks
(like the one in DeMontreville Wildlife
Park) help orient park visitors to nearby
amenities
Figure 5.27: Lake Elmo does not currently
have a snow removal plan for trails,
confusing some community members
Figure 5.28: Developing trailheads with
amenities and/or accessible restrooms
increases trail use and safety
80 | RECOMMENDATIONS
FIGURE 5.29 | CONNECTIVITY RECOMMENDATIONS + SEARCH CORRIDORS MAP
81
OPEN SPACE + PRESERVE
RECOMMENDATIONS
5. Protect and preserve public open spaces to connect the
community to nature
• 5.1 - Provide a distributed network of open space preserves
»5.1.1 - Classify the following parks to be natural areas:
* DeMontreville Wildlife Park (from community park)
* Heights Park (from neighborhood park)
* Heritage Park (from neighborhood park)
* Homestead Park (from neighborhood park)
* Lake Jane Hills Park (from neighborhood park)
* Legion Ave N Park (not currently classified)
»5.1.2 - Preserve additional natural areas if opportunities arise,
designating them as open space preserves
• 5.2 - Look for opportunities to improve the quality of open space
preserves
»5.2.1 - Explore the development of a natural resource
management plan for the open space preserves
• 5.3 - Proactively manage invasive species in the preserves
»5.3.1 - Encourage volunteer efforts to seek and apply for grant
funding to invasive species removal
»5.3.2 - (Continue to) Provide/Match requirement funds for grants
obtained by volunteer groups for invasive species removal
»5.3.3 - Embrace existing and new technologies and approaches
for invasive species removal
»5.3.4 - Create an invasive species management plan for the
preserves
»5.3.5 - Inventory for existing and emerging invasive species
threats
• 5.4 - Expand awareness of the open space preserves
»5.4.1 - Expand awareness of the open space preserves with
mapping, wayfinding, and entry signage
»5.4.2 - Educate the public about the benefits of open space
preserves and the need to preserve them
Figure 5.30: Heights Park, with its open
fields and unprogrammed spaces, is
better suited as a natural area
Figure 5.31: Emerald ash borer and other
invasive pests can cause major damage to
trees in preserves and open spaces
82 | RECOMMENDATIONS
OPERATIONS + MAINTENANCE
RECOMMENDATIONS
6. Plan proactively to provide a high quality system
• 6.1 - Use long-range planning tools to guide ongoing and capital
investments
»6.1.1 - Continue to maintain and utilize an operations,
maintenance, and replacement schedule for park facilities and
amenities
»6.1.2 - Work with Engineering on a trail pavement management
program to make sure trails are high quality
»6.1.3 - Develop and implement a field management plan as the
need arises to ensure high quality fields for ballfields and turf
fields
»6.1.4 - Continue to collaborate with and support the Sally
Manzana Nature Center:
Streamline the process for approving events at the Nature
Center
7. Make sustainable improvements to operations
• 7.1 - Make recycling and composting the easy and clear choice
»7.1.1 - Offer recycling in all parks
»7.1.2 - Explore opportunities to implement a compost collection
system in parks
• 7.2 - Reduce the use of pesticides within parks
»7.2.1 - Pilot a pesticide free park, publicizing the effort and
seeking community feedback
»7.2.2 - Explore the use of integrated pest management
strategies
• 7.3 - Increase biodiversity and habitat with the use of native and
native-cultivar plants
»7.3.1 - Find opportunities to convert turf grass areas to more
naturalized conditions
• 7.4 - Incorporate stormwater best practices into parks
• 7.5 - Publicize the City’s efforts to make sustainable
improvements
Figure 5.32: Well-maintained parks
contribute to the health and well-being of
the community
Figure 5.34: Green infrastructure, like rain
gardens and permeable paving, help to
mitigate the effects of stormwater runoff
Figure 5.33: Composting contributes to
the structure and health of soil and can
be collected at parks
83
8. Expand the city’s capacity to maintain and grow the park
and trail system
• 8.1 - Explore partnerships to supplement the city’s capacity
for maintenance, programming, and improvements (work with
recreation clubs and associations, businesses, and other public
agencies)
»8.1.1 - Explore opportunities for revenue generation
»8.1.2 - Explore opportunities for the use of volunteers to support
maintenance or programs
»8.1.3 - Investigate the use of bonds or tax levies to support the
system
»8.1.4 - Work with private property owners who may be
interested in donating land or granting easements
• 8.2 - Explore staffing and departmental updates to respond to
increased demands on the system
»8.2.1 - Create dedicated Parks and Forestry departments
»8.2.2 - Create a program manager position to begin offering
programming in parks and preserves to activate parks, such as
yoga in the park or stargazing events
Figure 5.35: Dedicated parks and forestry
departments are vital to the longevity of
park and trail systems
Figure 5.36: “Yoga in the Park” allows
community members to enjoy nature,
exercise, and socialize
Figure 5.37: “Movies in the Park” improve
social connections and provide a respite
from the busyness of day to day life.
80 Figure 6.1: Natural path in Homestead Park
81
0606
IMPLEMENTATIONIMPLEMENTATION
This section will touch on the importance of establishing priorities for
recommendation improvements, explore potential funding mechanisms
and opportunities, and suggest a path to implementation moving forward.
Public partners and local community groups - including residents, the local
government, the school district, local businesses, developers, and other
partnering agencies - must work together to fully realize the vision for Lake
Elmo’s parks, trails, and open space system.
82 | IMPLEMENTATION
SETTING PRIORITIES
Over the years, Lake Elmo has worked to align
funding and mechanisms for land acquisition,
facility additions and improvements, trail
development, and operations and maintenance.
Without a formal parks and recreation department
in place, however, the city has been unable to
develop an efficient process for prioritizing
improvements and identifying potential funding
resources. The city is in need of an adaptable and
flexible framework to help guide the development,
improvement, and projected maintenance of future
park, trail, and open space assets.
The priorities in this plan are drawn from the
improvement recommendations identified in the
Chapter 5. They are organized into five key topic
areas, including:
• Parks
• Facilities
• Connectivity
• Open Space and Preserves
• Operations and Maintenance
Many factors informed the prioritization of
recommendations in this report, including
community and stakeholder input, the availability
of city resources (e.g., time, staff, funding, etc.),
and alignment with past planning documents,
among other factors. Depending on staff resources,
funding, and need, some initiatives will be easier
and faster to achieve, while others may warrant
a long-term commitment to implement. This plan
anticipates the cumulative improvements for the
park and trail system will be completed in phases as
funding is available and opportunities for public and
private partners arise.
In the future, as city staff prepares to implement
park and trail-related improvements, they should
continue to keep residents involved/updated
through social media outlets and the city website’s
“Park Notices” tab (Home > Departments > Parks >
Park Notices).
The following pages include an implementation
matrix which provides information about the
improvement recommendations’ priority levels
and planning-level budget estimates. The general
timelines for implementation for each priority level
are as follows:
• Low Priority Level = 1 - 3 years
• Medium Priority Level = 4 - 7 years
• High Priority Level = 8+ years
Following the matrix is a compilation of funding
resources for Lake Elmo to explore.
FIRST PRIORITY: PARKS DIRECTOR
As mentioned, Lake Elmo does not currently
have a parks director to assist in the
improvement and development of the city’s
park and trail system. Adding this position
is the most critical action the city can take
toward improving their park and trail system
as the future unfolds. Without a dedicated
parks director, the recommendations and
implementation strategies discussed in this
plan will be difficult to fulfill.
ACTIONS PRIORITY LEVEL COST RANGE NOTES
LOW MED HIGH
PARKS
INITIATIVE 1.1.1 Work to fill the park
access gap in the southeast and
north-central areas of the city when
development occurs
Accept the 5% land dedication in the
rural north-central district of the city
and develop a neighborhood park •$400,000 to $650,000
Accept the 10% land dedication in the
urban south eastern district of the
city and develop a neighborhood park
•$500,000 to $750,00
INITIATIVE 1.2.2 Ensure every
neighborhood park has a seating option,
picnic table, bike rack, shade trees or
structure, litter and recycling receptacle,
and park identification sign
Add seating to DeMontreville and
Ridge Parks •$1,500 to $2,500
Add picnic tables to Firefly, Kleis, and
Ridge Parks •$3,000 to $4,500
Add bike racks to DeMontreville,
Hammes Park, Hidden Knoll Park,
Firefly, Kleis, Pilot, Ridge, and Tana
Ridge Park
•$8,000 to $10,000
Add shade trees (or a shade structure)
to Ridge Park •$800 to $12,000
Add park entry sign to Ridge Park •$2,500 to $3,200
INITIATIVE 1.3.3 Explore the addition of
a special use park in the form of a mini
park in the Old Village
Engage the community in a planning
effort to study and identify potential
park sites and opportunities in the Old
Village
•$20,000 to $30,000
INITIATIVE 1.4.1 Combine Ivywood and
Stonegate Parks and reclassify the
combined park as a community park
Develop a long-range plan for
this new park, working with the
community to evaluate the addition
of off-street parking and additional
recreational amenities
•$20,000 to $35,000
83
TABLE 6.1 | PRIORITY INITIATIVES & COST ESTIMATES
ACTIONS PRIORITY LEVEL COST RANGE NOTES
LOW MED HIGH
INITIATIVE 1.4.3 Ensure every community
park has a seating option, picnic table,
bike rack, shade (trees or structure), trash
and recycling receptacles, entry signage,
informational kiosk, a drinking fountain,
off-street parking, and shelter
Add shelters to Reid and Tablyn Parks •$140,000 to $160,000
Improve parking lot at Tablyn Park •$70,000 to $80,000
Improve parking lot at Ridge Park •$70,000 to $80,000
INITIATIVE 1.4.4 Develop Lions Park as
Lake Elmo’s destination community
park
Develop a long-range plan for Lions
Park that maximizes its functionality
as a community gathering space
•$40,000 to $50,000
Renovate Lions Park - implement the
long-range plan •$650,000 to $950,000
INITIATIVE 1.5.1 Reclassify VFW Park from
neighborhood to athletic park
and support competitive and town ball
play here
Update parking lot (reorganize and
pave)•$80,000 to $90,000
Replace existing dugouts •$35,000 to $50,000
INITIATIVE 1.5.2 Develop a new community
athletic park to support baseball and
softball (competitive and town ball for
ages 9+)
Complete a feasibility study to
identify potential sites and high-level
configurations and costs
•$18,000 to $20,000
Develop a long-range plan for this
new park •$18,000 to $25,000
Implement a new community athletic
park •$2,000,000 to
$5,500,000
Costs vary with level
of development and
acquisition prices
84 | IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 6.1 CONT. | PRIORITY INITIATIVES
ACTIONS PRIORITY LEVEL COST RANGE NOTES
LOW MED HIGH
FACILITIES
INITIATIVE 2.1.1 Add special facilities to
meet the needs of tweens, teens, and
young adults (e.g., challenge-course facil-
ity, skate park, disc golf course, etc.)
Add a challenge course facility at Reid
or Pebble Park •$250,000 to $400,000
Add a skate park at Tablyn or Ridge
Park •$150,000 to $250,000
Add a disc golf course at Ridge or Reid
Park •$25,000 to $35,000
Develop an outdoor fitness park at a
community park •$60,000 to $70,000
INITIATIVE 2.1.2 Provide additional court
facilities in the SE area of the city
Add an additional sand volleyball
court, potentially in a future park •$25,000 to $35,000
INITIATIVE 2.1.3 Provide additional field
space in the SE area of the city
Look to provide additional field space;
engage with neighbors, clubs, and
organizations to determine type and
size of field (flex, lacrosse, football,
soccer)
•$45,000 to $60,000
Consider locating in
a new Community
Athletic Park
INITIATIVE 2.2.1 Provide a reservable
shelter with potable water, electrical, and
permanent restrooms
Add a large shelter to Lions Park as
part of future park renovation •$400,000 to $600,000
INITIATIVE 2.2.3 Replace existing play
features or add new features that are
designed for a variety of age ranges
Update playground at Pebble Park
(community park)•$120,000 to $130,000 2024
Update playground at Demontreville
Park (neighborhood park)•$90,000 to $100,000 2024
Update playground at Kleis Park
(neighborhood park)•$60,000 to $70,000 2025
Update playground at Lions Park
(destination community park)•$230,000 to $300,000 2026
85
TABLE 6.1 CONT. | PRIORITY INITIATIVES
ACTIONS PRIORITY LEVEL COST RANGE NOTES
LOW MED HIGH
Update playground at Tablyn Park
(community park)•$120,000 to $130,000 2026
Update playground at Ridge Park
(neighborhood park)•$90,000 to $100,000 2026
Update playground at Stonegate Park
(community park)•$125,000 to $135,000 2027
Update playground at Carriage Station
Park (neighborhood park)•$90,000 to $100,000 2028
Update playground at Tana Ridge Park
(neighborhood park)•$90,000 to $100,000 2030
Update playground at Hidden Knoll
Park (neighborhood park)•$90,000 to $100,000 2032
Update playground at Reid Park
(community park)•$125,000 to $135,000 2033
INITIATIVE 2.4.1 Add winter facilities and
activities
Add trail signage to support cross
country skiing at DeMontreville
Wildlife Park (natural area)
•$4,000 to $6,000
Add outdoor ice skating at a new park
in the southeast part of the city •$45,000 to $200,000 Costs vary with level
of development
INITIATIVE 2.6.1 Support the addition of a
fishing pier in Sunfish Lake Park •$150,000 to $250,000
CONNECTIVITY
INITIATIVE 3.1.1 Address gaps identified
in the Connectivity Recommendations +
Search Corridors Map
Central Greenway Regional Trail
Development •$500,000 to $600,000
Add trail along Manning, connecting
Oak Land Middle School to Stillwater
Blvd
•$1,000,000 to
$2,300,000
Add trail on east side of Keats Avenue
N •$420,000 to $600,000
Address trail gap on 5oth St N east of
Lily Ave N •$16,000 to $30,000
Add trail on south side of 43rd St N
west of Lake Elmo Avenue •$100,000 to $225,000
Add trail on south side of 50th Street
N and 47th St N, west of Keats to Lily
Ave N
•$625,000 to $1,300,000
86 | IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 6.1 CONT. | PRIORITY INITIATIVES
ACTIONS PRIORITY LEVEL COST RANGE NOTES
LOW MED HIGH
Add trail connection on south side of
Julep Ave N to Tapestry Rd •$150,000 to $325,000
Add trail on north side of 10th St. N
from Manning to Inwood •$1,200,000 to
$2,600,000
OPEN SPACE + PRESERVES
INITIATIVE 5.2.1 Develop a natural
resource management plan for the open
space preserves/natural areas •Work with
volunteers currently
engaged with this
effort
INITIATIVE 5.3.4 Create and implement
an invasive species management plan for
the open space preserves/natural areas
•
Add a program
manager to
coordinate with
volunteers currently
engaged with this
effort
INITIATIVE 5.4.1 Expand awareness of
the open space preserves with mapping,
wayfinding, and entry signage
•
Update and/or add entry signs to the
6 open space preserves/natural areas •$15,000 to $20,000
OPERATIONS + MAINTENANCE
INITIATIVE 7.3.1 Find opportunities to
convert turf grass areas to more
naturalized conditions
Expand forested areas and/or
establish micro forests •$300 to $500 / acre
INITIATIVE 8.2.1 Create a dedicated Parks
& Forestry department ** FIRST PRIORITY
Hire a full time parks director •$120,000 to $165,000 /
year
Estimate includes
total compensation
Hire a full or part time forester •$100,000 to $150,000 /
year
Estimate includes
total compensation
INITIATIVE 4.2.1 Implement a snow
removal plan for trails •$50,000 to $60,000 /
year
Estimate varies
based on approach
(additional hire or
contract service)
INITIATIVE 8.2.2 Add a program manager
position to begin offering unique
programming in parks and preserves
•$100,000 to $150,000 /
year
Estimate includes
total compensation
TOTALS •$2,719,000 to $4,890,000 (high priority)
(excludes operations and maintenance costs)•$6,040,000 to $11,950,000 (medium priority)
• $1,720,000 to $2,885,000 (low priority)
87
TABLE 6.1 CONT. | PRIORITY INITIATIVES
FUNDING
OPTION DESCRIPTION SOURCE
General Funds
A city’s general fund is the main
operating account that covers basic
operating costs such as planning,
police and fire services, and street
and park maintenance
Money collected by the city in taxes,
fines, fees, and revenues
Dedicated Tax Levy
City’s can hold a referendum to
levy a dedicated tax for a specific
purpose. In the case of parks
and recreation, the tax can fund
operations, maintenance, and capital
improvement projects
Property taxes
Bonding
Borrowing obligations that incur
interest and require repayment at
a specific date. These are typically
issued to pay for larger capital
projects
Annual appropriation bonds, tax
abatement bonds, and revenue bonds
Local Option Sales Tax
Minnesota Statute gives cities the
authority to levy a local sales tax
by an election process for specific
capital improvements
Sales tax addition
State Aid
Funds available to pedestrian and
bicycle improvements on state aid
roadways (key county highways),
most beneficial during construction
or reconstruction projects
State of Minnesota
Park and Trail Dedication
Land or cash in-lieu of land from new
subdivision developments that must
be used for new equipment or park
facilities
Developers
Partnerships
Partnerships with private and/
or other public entities can be in
many forms, including funding,
design, operations and maintenance
agreements, etc.
Public or private organizations, clubs,
agencies, governments, etc.
Donations
Gifts of cash, equipment, labor or
others from private individuals or
groups
Individuals, businesses, groups, etc..
88 | IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 6.3 | FUNDING RESOURCES
FUNDING RESOURCES
Securing additional funds to invest in Lake Elmo’s park and recreation system is critical to future
implementation and realizing Lake Elmo’s vision for 2040. The city should explore and consider the following
sources, mechanisms, and partners.
FUNDING
GRANT DESCRIPTION OF GRANT AGENCY
AARP Community Challenge Grant
Small grants to fund quick-action
projects that can help communities
become more livable for people of all
ages
AARP
America Walks Community Change
Grants
Awards stipends to communities for
projects related to creating healthy,
active, and engaged places to live,
work, and play
Foundation
American Trails Trail Fund
Assists the trails community with
funding to support maintenance,
research, and stewardship training
needs
Foundation
Bridge Investment Program
Provides funding for communities to
replace, rehabilitate, and preserve
bridge infrastructure
U.S. Department of Transportation
Invasive Species Eradication Funding
Opportunity
Provides funding for projects that
seek to eradicate invasive species
(part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure
Law)
U.S. Department of the Interior/U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service
Clean Water Funding
Provides hands-on environmental
stewardship and service-learning
opportunities to youth and young
adults while providing low-cost labor
to eligible applicants
Minnesota Board of Water and Soil
Resources (BWSR)
Community Facilities Direct Loan and
Grant
Provides affordable funding to
develop essential community
facilities in rural areas
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA)
Conservation Partners Legacy Grant
Program
Provides funding to restore, protect,
or enhance prairies, wetlands,
forests, or habitat for fish, game or
wildlife in Minnesota
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
Environment and Natural Resources
Trust Fund
Aims to protect, conserve, preserve,
and enhance Minnesota’s air, water,
land, fish, wildlife, and other natural
resources
Legislative-Citizen Commission on
Minnesota Resources (LCCMR)
Federal Recreation Trail Program
Provides funding to encourage the
maintenance and development
of motorized, non-motorized, and
diversified trails
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
Fields for Kids
Provides financial support to improve
baseball and/or softball facilities
for youth in the Upper Midwest and
Southwest Florida
Minnesota Twins Community Fund
Fishing Pier and Shore Fishing Area
Program
Joint Power Agreement with the
DNR for installation, operations an
maintenance
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
89
TABLE 6.3 CONT. | FUNDING RESOURCES
GRANT NAME DESCRIPTION OF GRANT AGENCY
Local Trail Connections Program
Provides funding to promote short
trail connections between where
people live and significant public
resources
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
Minnesota Festival Support Grant
Program
Provides arts experiences through
festivals celebrating arts, building
community, and exposure to diverse
art forms
Other - Minnesota
Natural and Scenic Area Grants
Provides funding to increase, protect,
and enhance natural and scenic
areas
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
No Child Left Inside
Aims to support and increase
efforts to expand programming that
connects youth to the outdoors
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
Our Town Grant Program
Supports projects that integrate arts,
culture, and design activities into
efforts that strengthen communities
by advancing local economic,
physical, and/or social outcomes
National Endowment for the Arts
Outdoor Recreation Grant Program
Provides funding to increase and
enhance outdoor recreation facilities
in local and community parks
throughout the state
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
Parks and Trail Legacy Grant Program
Provides funding for parks and trails
of regional significance outside of
the seven county metropolitan area
Minnesota Department of Natural
Resources (MNDNR)
PeopleForBikes Community Grant
Program
Provides funding that supports
bicycle infrastructure projects and
targeted advocacy initiatives that
make it easier and safer for people
of all ages and abilities to ride
Other - Minnesota
The Rapid Response Fund
Provides financial resources to
assess and support response actions
for quick containment or eradication
of newly detected species
National Park Service
Rivers, Trails, and Conservation
Assistance Program
Supports community-led natural
resource conservation and outdoor
recreation projects across the nation
National Park Service
Rural Initiative Grant Fund Program
Provides funding to encourage
collective and involved endeavors
among citizens in rural communities
Foundation
Safe Routes to School Infrastructure
Grants/Safe Routes to School
Planning Assistance Grants
Provides funding for the development
and implementation of infrastructure
projects which enable students to
walk and bicycle to and from schools
Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT)
State Park Road Account Program
Provides funding to assist local
governments in improving access to
public recreation facilities
Minnesota Department of
Transportation (MNDOT)
90 | IMPLEMENTATION
TABLE 6.3 CONT. | FUNDING RESOURCES
91
This page has been left intentionally blank.This page has been left intentionally blank.
92 Figure 7.1: Vegetation in Heritage Park
INVENTORY MAPS..............................................................................94 - 117
COMMUNITY SURVEY RESULTS...................................................117 - 197
POP-UP EVENT BOARDS................................................................198 - 204
93
0707
APPENDIXAPPENDIX
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105