Laserfiche WebLink
STAFF REPORT <br />DATE: March 11, 2025 <br /> Workshop Discussion <br /> <br /> <br />TO: Mayor and Council <br />FROM: Clarissa Hadler, Finance Director <br />Nina Kraemer, Finance Coordinator <br />AGENDA ITEM: Utility Financial Management Plan Updates <br /> <br />CORE STRATEGIES: <br /> <br />☐ Vibrant, inclusive, connected community ☐ Efficient, reliable, innovative services <br />☐ Responsive, transparent, adaptive governance ☒ Balanced Finances now and future <br />☐ Managed Growth ☒ Resilient Infrastructure <br /> <br />BACKGROUND: <br />First in 2016, again in 2020, and most recently in 2023 the city contracted with Northland Securities, Inc <br />to complete a long-range financial management plan for the water, sewer and storm water funds. This past <br />year, with the addition of a Finance Coordinator, we were able to bring that analysis in-house, with the <br />assistance of the Northland model. <br /> <br />ISSUE BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL: <br /> 1) What should the utility rate increase be for 2025? <br /> <br />DISCUSSION: <br />The financial management plan is an important tool used to set rates and plan for future operations and <br />investments in the utility funds. The plan incorporates the capital improvement projects from the 10-year <br />CIP, an assumption on growth in customers and operations, financing strategies, and fund balance policy <br />to arrive at the rates needed to support each utility fund. <br /> <br />The assumptions utilized to draft this plan changed in a few ways since last year. We had to rework our <br />development prediction model as the prior City Administrator had been the one to draft that in the past. <br />Community Development Director Stopa and City Planner Jensen aided in the development of the current <br />model, which is significantly more detailed than in years past. We believe our predictions in near-most- <br />years are fairly accurate, as these are easier to gauge. Far-years are more difficult, and we’ve taken a <br />more conservative approach in estimating those. <br /> <br />Another assumption that needed to change was the number of new MPCA-funded connections. The <br />MPCA has halted funding on water extensions paid via the 3M settlement funds, in favor of funding more <br />treatment plants. This change significantly decreased revenues including connection fees and ongoing <br />service charges, in both the water and sewer fund. <br /> <br />The results of these changing assumptions are indicative of how highly subsidized our utility operations <br />are by development. Projected revenues in all funds dropped significantly from the prior model when we <br />remove the new connections from the MPCA-funded projects. <br /> <br />The final assumption that has an immense impact on the water fund will be the operations and