Laserfiche WebLink
<br />The mission of the City of Lake Elmo is to provide planned, quality public services consistent with the City’s <br />character in a fiscally responsible manner in partnership with our community. <br />The City of Lake Elmo | 3880 Laverne Ave N | Lake Elmo | MN 55042 <br />1. 2012: Lawsuit Filed. In November 2012, the White Bear Lake Restoration <br />Association and the White Bear Lake Homeowners Association filed a suit in Ramsey <br />County District Court alleging the permitted too much groundwater use near White Bear <br />Lake, causing the lake water levels to drop unacceptably. <br />2. 2014: Plaintiffs and DNR Reach Settlement Agreement. In December of 2014, the <br />DNR and the plaintiffs in the lawsuit reached a settlement, contingent on achieving several <br />requirements. The settlement agreement required: <br />• Work on water conservation and efficiency strategies with 13 area public water <br />suppliers. <br />• Establish a protective elevation for White Bear Lake. <br />• Support legislative funding for a feasibility and design study to shift the source water <br />for six communities in the White Bear Lake area to surface water. <br />• Achieve funding for the alternative water supply by the end of the 2016 Minnesota <br />legislative session. <br />• Inform the plaintiffs of groundwater use permit applications and permit changes in <br />the area, and provide them an opportunity to comment on those applications and <br />proposed permit changes. <br />• Invite the plaintiffs to participate as members on the North and East Metro <br />Groundwater Management Area project advisory team. <br />3. 2016: No Legislative Funding for Shift to Surface Water Use. The DNR and the <br />plaintiffs in the lawsuit met with legislators to discuss the prospects of passing legislation <br />in the 2016 session to address the “Phase 1” alternative water supply Northeast Metro <br />Project opens in a new browser tab outlined in the settlement agreement. In April of that <br />year, a bill was introduced to provide some funding to assess the feasibility of the “Phase I” <br />project, but the measure was not enacted. Because the proposed bill was not enacted, the <br />stay on the litigation was lifted per the terms of the settlement agreement and the lawsuit <br />went to trial. The “Phase I” project as defined in the settlement agreement would have <br />connected six municipalities to either raw or treated water purchased from St. Paul <br />Regional Water Services. <br />4. 2017-2018: Ramsey County District Court Order and Resulting Permit <br />Modifications. Following failure to obtain feasibility funding for the “Phase I” project before