My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 95-37
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
1990's
>
1995
>
Resolution 95-37
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:43:24 PM
Creation date
1/13/2014 1:42:15 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO. 95-37 <br />CITY OF LAKE ELMO <br />WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA <br />A RESOLUTION APPROV|NGTHE FINAL PLAT (}F <br />LAKE ELMO HEIGHTS 3RD ADDITION <br />WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has previously considered and approved the <br />preliminary plat nf Lake Elmo Heights 3rd Addition; and <br />WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission reviewed a final plat for Lake Elmo Heights 3rd <br />Addition o1 its April 24. 1905' meeting, and <br />WHEREAS, the final plat of Lake Elmo Heights 3rd Addition presented to the City Council conforms to <br />the City's subdivision ordinance. <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo does hereby <br />approve and accept the final plat of Lake Elmo Heights 3rd Addition as the same as on file with the City <br />Administrator, subject tu the following conditions: <br />1. The applicant meets conditions set forth by the Valley Branch Watershed District in its letter of <br />February 24,18&5. <br />2. The applicant meets the conditions set forth by the City Engineer in his letters dated February 23, <br />1Q95 and April 20.1A05. <br />3. The applicant meets the conditions set forth by the City Planner in his letter dated February 22.1S95. <br />4. The applicant provides a revised landscape plan, with the final plat that is consistent with City <br />landscape regulations, with the discretion of the placement on the landscaping requirements of the <br />individual lots should compliment what the individual property owner wants as along as it is in compliance <br />with the City regulations. Responsibility to comply with the ordinance rests with the developer. <br />5. The park land dedication, as shown on the preliminary plat, and cash combination to meet the (� <br />�denquinem��be by the Ci�aa�ommendedbv the Parks Commh��n. ' <br />O. 27\h Street North shall not be used for construction and b*uo signed indicating that it shall not be <br />used for construction traffic including |nnadale Avenue and a temporary barricade installed atthe end of <br />7. Future road extension signs aha|beolauodnnoul-de-sacaand streets which may ba extended inthe <br />8. An erosion control plan shall be submitted to the City Engineer along with the construction plans for <br />road improvements. No easement will bg provided in the NN/ corner nf Lot S and west side of Lot Y0 to <br />tie in with Ideal Avenue North. Easement for road right-of-way is deleted from plat, <br />9. The developer enters into a Development Agreement with the City subject to approval bv the City <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.