The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutResolution 99-46RESOLUTION NO. 99 -46 i A 0 IN 01 OW-301141; WHEREAS, United Properties has made application to the City of Lake Elmo for a Planned Unit Development Stage Plan and preliminary plat pursuant to Section 300.08 and Chapter 400 of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code for the following described parcels of land; to wit: PARCEL L The West half of the Southeast Quarter (WI/2 of SE 1/4) of Section Thirty -three (33), Township Twenty - nine (29) North, Range Twenty -one (2 1) West, except that part lying north of the north. right -of -way line as shown on State Highway Right -of -way Plat No. 4 of 12, State Project 8282 (94 -392) 902, plus PARCEL 2: The East one -half of the Southeast Quarter (E1 /2 of SEI. /4) of Section Thirty-three (33), Township Twenty - nine (29) North, Range Twenty -one (2 1) West, containing according to the United States Survey thereof Eighty (80) acres. EXCEPTING, therefrom the West 175.0 feet of the East 568.52 feet of the South 373.37 feet of the East one -half of the Southeast Quarter (E 1 /2 of SE 1 /4) of Section Thirty -three (33), Township Twenty -nine (29) North, Range Twenty -one (21) West, Village of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota, containing 1.5 acres, more or less, subject to the right-of-way of Minnesota Highway 12. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom the East 200.0 feet of the South 435.6 feet of the East one -half of the Southeast quarter (E1 /2 of SEI /4) of Section 33, Township 29 North, Range 21 West. ALSO EXCEPTING therefrom that certain 11.54 acres, more or less, as is more specifically set forth in. a plat, dated February 19, 1972 and filed for record with the Washington County Registrar of Titles on March 1, 1972 as Document No. 33420, being Parcel 27 as shown on said plat, plus PARCEL 3: That part of the East one -half of the Southeast one - quarter (E1 /2 of SETA) of Section 33, Township 29, Range 21 West, Village of Lake Ehno, previously intended to be taken. by the State of Minnesota for right - of -way for Trunk Highway No. 94 as more specifically set forth in a plat dated February 19, 1972 and filed for record with the Washington County Registrar of Titles on March 1, 1972 as Document No.33420, containing 11.54 acres, more or less, being parcel 27 as shown on said plat. EXCEPTING from Parcels 1, 2, and 3 those portions taken for highway purposes. WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission considered the Planned Unit Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat request at its June 28, 1999 meeting, and recommended that the PUD Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat be approved based on the following findings.: 1. The Development Stage Plan conforms to the Comprehensive Plan. of the City. 2. The Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat satisfy the intent and purposes of the City's land use, zoning and subdivision regulations. 3. The Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat are consistent with the public health, safety and general welfare. 4. The Development Stage Plan is substantially responsive to the approved Concept Stage Plan., including those conditions attached thereto. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council does hereby approve and accept the Planned Unit Development Stage Plan and Preliminary Plat, the same are on file with the City Administrator subject to the following conditions: I . All site development shall be consistent with the Development Stage Application booklet dated May 29, 1999, as amended by United Properties submissions of June 23, 1999, as the June 23, 1999 submissions were amended by the Planning Commission and evidenced by dating and signature by the City Planner. 2. Compliance with the City Engineer's memo of June 11, 1999. 3. The public street extending southerly from Hudson Road shall be added to the Preliminary Plat. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council this 20'x` day of July, 1999. 4 Lee Hunt, Mayor ATTEST: Ma Kue � ter, City minist ator JUN -11 -1999 11 =80 651 292 0883 P.81/ 03 YOLTZ, KING, DUVALL. ANDERSON AND ASSOCI0.TES,INCORPORAYED ENGENEERS ® ARCHITECTS ® PLANNERS 1566 PIPER JAFFAAY PLAZA 444 CEDAR STREET SAINT PAUL, MINNESOTA $5101 -2140 PHONE,.W/292.4400 FAX :851292.0683 3une 11, 1999 Planning Commission Members Lake Elmo, Minnesota Re., Review of PUD Eagle Point Business Park Lake Elmo, Minnesota Commission No. 9150 -99A Dear Planning Commission .Members, I have reviewed the PUD dated May 28, 1999, and offer the following comments: Streets Last year the City Council placed the future street though this area on the City's Municipal State Aid System. This means that the new street will need to meet State Aid Rules for design. It also means that the City has the option of receiving State Aid funds to build the road_ In the past the City has built roads with State -Aid Funds, and also assessed the cost them_ The money received from abutting property owners through assessments is there used throughout the city for other street improvement and repair projects. The FEUD shows an undivided., four - lane, forty -foot wide street with concrete curb and gutter. A sixty -foot wide right- of-way is proposed. in order to meet State Aid Rules, a forty- four -foot wide street would be required. In the past we have required an eighty -foot wide right -of -way on State Aid Routes. I would recommend that a more appealing street section would be a divided two -lane road with a twelve to sixteen -foot wide landscaped median. Left and right turn lanes would be constructed at the driveways. This street design would require a minimum of a fifteen -foot wide lane, in each direction, however an eighteen -foot wide lane would be more appropriate. Trails The Developer is proposing a five -foot wide trail be constructed through the development. I would recommend that it be a minimum of eight -feet wide, with a 5% maximum grade. An Equaf Opportunity Employer JUN -11 -1999 11:01 Planning Commission 06/11/99 Page 2 Surface Water Runoff' 551 292 0083 P.02iO3 The developer Appears to be meeting the City and Watershed District rules for ponding and runoff. A thorough review of each property will be made as the Business Park develops. Sanitary Sewer The sanitary sewer plan appears to be adequate. Utility easements will be required over all pipes outside of the street right -of -way. Final routes will be determined as development occurs_ Capacity in the W_O.N.E. interceptor retrains an issue. The developer may need to limit the size and type of business uses until our allocation is increased. Watermain In our May 1995 Feasibility Report for this area, we recommended that a 1,000 gpm well, and a 340,000 gallon concrete ground storage reservoir with 2,500 gallon per minute pumps be constructed to meet fare suppression demand. This development is temporarily connected to the City of Oakdale water system. The City of Lake Elmo needs to make plans at this time for its own water system for this area. I recommend that we discuss with the developer the possibility of acquiring some property within this development for these facilities. The size requirements for these facilities are fairly small. The location for the well and tank are flexible. The city would need to drill a test well before acquiring a well site. We estimated the cost of a well and tank at $855,000.00 in 1995. The watermains will need to be twelve -inch to meet fire suppression needs. Eire loops around each building are also generally necessary. Traffic. Management It is anticipated that with growth in both lake Elmo and Oakdale, traffic signals and intersection improvements will be needed at the intersection of Hudson Road and Inwood Avenue. 'These improvements will cost the City of Lake Elmo between $50,000.000 and $75,0000.00, based on typical cost splits. JUN -11 -1999 11:01 Planning Commission 06/11199 Page 3 Financing 651 292 0083 P.03iO3 It is anticipated that the developer will pay for all sewer, watermain, ponding, streets, and trails within the development_ The City will need to review methods to pay for a new well and ground storage reservoir, and the traffic signal. The City may with to Iook at impact fees andlor direct assessments for these items. Sincerely; Thomas Prew, P.E. City .Engineer TOTAL P.03