HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 99-39CITY OF LAKE ELMO
WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA
RESOLUTION NO. 99-39
A RESOLUTION REQUESTING EXTENSION OF THE DECEMBER 31, 1998 DUE DATE
FOR REVIEW OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
FOR CONSISTENCY
WITH AMENDED METROPOLITAN COUNCIL POLICY PLANS
WHEREAS, state statutes (Minn. Stat. 473.1.75- 473.871 (1996) requires that cities review and
revise their comprehensive plans for consistency with Metropolitan Council policy plans; and
WHEREAS, the Metropolitan Council has amended its policy plans; and has provided system
statements outlining Council policy relative to the City; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is required to review its comprehensive plan for consistency
with the amended policy plans and to prepare a revised comprehensive plan for submission to the
Metropolitan Council by December 31, 1998; and
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo has scheduled and budgeted to complete a major review and
update of its comprehensive plan by December 31, 1999; which date was extended to .Tune 30, 1999 by the
Metropolitan Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the City of Lake Elmo requests that the
Metropolitan Council grant the City of Lake Elmo a 6 -month extension to the deadline to complete its
comprehensive plan; circulate the revised document to the adjacent governmental units and affected school
districts for review and comment; and, following approval by the planning commission and after
consideration by the City Council, submit the plan to the Metropolitan Council for review.
The motion for adoption of the foregoing resolution was introduced by Dunn, seconded by Armstrong, and
upon a vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: Dunn, Armstrong, Siedow, Hunt,
DeLapp, and the following voted against the same: None.
WHEREUPON said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted by the Lake Elmo City
Council on the 6th day of July, 1999. --
ATTEST:
Lul
Mary Kuef r, Ci.t A trator
Resolution No. 99- 5 4
STATE OF MINNESOTA )
) SS
COUNTY OF WASHINGTON )
Lee Hunt, Mayor
I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified City Administrator of the City of Lake Elmo, County of
Washington, State of Minnesota, do hereby certify that I have carefully compared the attached and
foregoing extract of minutes of a regular meeting said City Council held on 6th day of July, 1999, with the
original thereof on file in Lake Elmo City Hall.
Mary Kueffner, City Administrator
CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA
REQUEST FOR EXThoiSION OF PLANNING PERIOD TO DECEMBER 31, 1999
Completed request form and accompanying Resolution must be received at the
Metropolitan Council offices by June 30, 1999, or as soon thereafter as is practicable.
Community Name -? , 6 Date of Extension Application Cd 7
Name of Local Contact Person UC _ fie Phone A ` —5� ","�
Fax g Internet Address e e a � 04
` - -
Your responses to the following questions will provide the Metropolitan Council with information
needed to help ensure plan completion by December 31, 1999.
PLANNING PROCESS TIMELINE: Working backwards from 12/31/99, please provide the
target dates for each step of the planning process identified below.
No later than 12/31/99 - Date of plan submission to Metropolitan Council
-City Council /Township Board/County Board action
/Y ( �Y
- Public hearing date
No later than 10/31/99 - Initiation of 60 -day review /comment period by
adjacent jurisdictions and school districts
- Completion of draft plan text and mapping
1lrNI G I SUE": 1 lease Place a aleck yarn (%/') next to the issues Identified below that are
contributing to the need for the requested extension.
Staff workload
❑ Contract planner delays
Issues affecting adjacent communities
❑ Data/mapping/GIS
❑ MUSA expansion issues
0 Area development or redevelopment plan(s).
in process
❑ Planning Commission/City Council /Board
❑ Population, household, employment
forecast issues
❑ Sewer flow forecast issues
❑ Growth staging plan
❑ Public participation process
❑ Worksheet "A"
❑ ;Worksheet "B"
)"Metropolitan Council density policy issues
BE
❑ Development of plan components:
_ Existing land use
_ Future land use
_ Housing
Surface Water Mgmt.
Solar Access Protection
_ Transportation
Sewer Plan
Park/Open Space Plan
_ Water Supply Plan
Aviation/Airport Plan
Historic Preservation Plan
_ Solar Access Protection
Implementation
_ Critical Areas /MNRRA
Other
FORECASTS: Please provide the information requested below to the best of your ability at this
point in your planning process. (Circle one)
Yes No Have community household forecasts changed from the previous extension request?
If "Yes," to what extent?
Yes No Have community population forecasts changed from the previous exteusion request?
If "Yes," to what extent?
Yes No Have community employment forecasts changed from the previous extension
request? If "Yes," to what extent?
Yes rNo Have community wastewater flow forecasts changed from the previous extension
t request? If "Yes," to what extent?
Yes No Have community estimates of vacant, developable land within the MUSA changed
` from the previous extension request? If "Yes," to what extent?
Yes f No Have community estimates of the amount of land needed to be added to the MfUSA
t changed from the previous extension request? If "Yes," to what extent?
OTHER COMMENTS: Please provide any additional comments here. Include a realistic
appraisal of your community's ability to submit your updated plan for review by the 12/31/99
deadline. (Use additional sheets as necessary.)
V:\ LIBRARY \COly MUNDV\Peters\Ext ExecSum.doc
IM