My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2002-048
LakeElmo
>
City Council
>
Resolutions (1970's to 2020)
>
2000's
>
2002
>
Resolution 2002-048
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/5/2025 2:41:20 PM
Creation date
2/5/2014 2:05:41 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
2
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
RESOLUTION NO 2002-048 <br />WHEREAS, at its April 8, 2002 meeting, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission <br />conducted a Public hearing regarding this Open Space Preservation Concept Plan <br />application from St.Croixland /Jed Wier to develop a combined site of 40 acres with 16 <br />single family detached building sites. <br />WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission recommended approval of the <br />OP Concept Plan of Sunfish Ponds; subject to design modifications as follows: <br />1. Those conditions recommended by the April 2, 2002 Planning Staff Report <br />(Wetland Evaluation) Minnesota Land Trust comments, and outlot redesign. <br />2. Relocation of some building lots to more northerly portions of the site — <br />at a minimum reversing Outlot B with Blocks 2 and 3. <br />3. Reduce the length of the cul -de -sac streets to increase the continuity of the <br />Preserved Open Space to the south periphery of the site. <br />WHEREAS, at its May 7, 2002 meeting, the Lake Elmo City Council conducted a <br />public hearing and reviewed this Open Space Preservation Concept Plan. <br />NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Lake Elmo City Council hereby <br />denies approval of the Sunfish Ponds OP Concept Plan for St.Croixland/Wier staff-dated <br />April 2, 2002; based on the following conditions: <br />1. The applicant's proposal to attain the required 40 acre parcel area <br />by addition of an illogical 6 -acre appendage is inconsistent with <br />the intent and purposes of the Open Space Preservation Ordinance <br />standards regarding minimum of 40 -acres parcel size. <br />2. The proposed Preserved Open Space is not aggregated in a manner that <br />will preserve rural character. The Preserved Open Space proposed by <br />the Concept Plan, while technically meeting ordinance prescribed <br />aggregation standards, does so in a disjointed manner. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.