HomeMy WebLinkAboutResolution 2016-092CITY OF LAKE ELMOai
A
111 1% !1 iiiii, li
ii 1 1 1
11011 Will 1
ACC'E5Wf?Y SJRUUJ'UAEP#W IHEPI?01"L4'RI'YLVCAIEDAI'56YY KEAISA VENUE
�NORTH
WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing
under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and
WHEREAS, Rod and Diane Sessing, 5699 Keats Avenue North, Lake Elmo, MN 55042,
(the "Applicatif") has submitted an application to the C* of Lake Elmo (the "City") for a
Conditional Use Pennit to allow an additional accessory structure at the property located at 5699
Keats Avenue North (the 'Troperty"). and
WHEREAS, notice has been published, mailed and posted pursuant to the Lake Elmo
Zoning Ordinance, Section 154.102; and
WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held a public hearing on said matter
on October 10, 2016; and
WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and
recommendation to the City Council as part of a Staff Memorandum dated October 18, 2016,
2016; and
WHEREAS, the City Council considered said matter at its October 18, 2016 meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, based on the testimony elicited and information received, the City
Council makes the following:
1) That the procedures for obtaining said Conditional Use Permit are found in the Lake
Elmo Zoning Ordinance, Section 154.106,
2) That all the submission requirements of said Section 154.106 have been met by the
Applicant.
3) That Subd. B of Section 154.406- Accessory Structures, Rural Districts, provides that
additional accessory buildings may be considered in Agricultural and Rural Residenti
zones via a conditional use permit, I
Resolution 2016-092
4) That the proposed Conditional Use Perinit is to allow an additional accessory structure in
a Rural Residential zoning district, at the property located at 5699 Keats Avenue North.
5) That the Conditional Use Permit amendment is granted for the property legally described
as follows and commonly known as 5699 Keats Avenue North:
11th I UP I• ec i owns ip an
0102921.23.0003
6) The proposed use will not be detrimental to or endanger the public health, safety, comfort,
convenience or general welfare of the neighborhood or the city.
The proposed use would not make a major impact on the property. The proposed accessory
structure would be located in an area that is of lower grade than the rest of the property
and is mostly screened from view front the street and adjacent properties.
7) The use or development conforms to the City of Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan.
The proposal is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in that the property is guided or
Rural Area Development. The Comprehensive Plait proclaims that "existing operating
agricultural uses and qualifying alternative uses that preserve the open space within the
community shall be supported. These uses shall be encouraged to continue operations and
to retain large land holdings that contribute to operating efficiency... the City shall
affirmatively establish and pursue specific strategies and seek resources to assist existing
agricultural uses in remaining a viable alternative to urbanization for landowners,
consistent with the concept cif "a right to. arm. ""
8) The use or development is compatible with the existing neighborhood.
The use is compatible with the existing neighborhood, as similar accessory structures exist
on some surrounding properties: The additional accessary structure is not expected to
make a significant impact on the property.
9) The proposed use meets all specific development standards for such use listed in Article 7 of
this Chapter.
There are no specific development standard for additional accessory structures listed in
Article 7 of this Chapter. However, Article 5, Section 154.213 sets forth standards for
Accessoty Buildings and Structures, Generally. Provided conditions are met, the porposed
accessory structure meets these standards.
10) If the proposed use is in a flood plain management or sboreland area, the proposed use meets
all the specific standards for such use listed in Chapter 150, § 150.250 through 150,257
(Shoreland Regulations) and Chapter 152 (Flood Plain Management),
The property is located in an area of minintalflood hazard.
11) The proposed use will be designed, constructed, operated and maintained so as to be
compatible in appearance with the existing or intended character of the general vicinity and
will not change the essential character of that area,
Resolution 2016-092 2
The use of an additional accessiny structure is not expected to change the essential
character of the area, as the area surrounding the Applicant's property has historically
been used for activejorining, and the proposed building will be located in such to manner
that it will not be directly visible frown surrounding properties. Addition ally forinerfarin
sites with multiple accessory buildings are not uncommon in this area.
12) The proposed use will -not be hazardous or create a nuisance as defined under this Chapter to
existing or future neighboring structures.
The proposed parking lot expansion will not be hazardous or create a nuisance, as the
parking lot will accommodate an increase in attendance that the existing parking lot does
not.
13) The proposed use will be served adequately by essential public facilities and services,
including streets, police and fire protection, drainage structures, refuse disposal, water and
sewer systems and schools or will be served adequately by such facilities and services
provided by the persons or agencies responsible for the establishment of the proposed use.
The proposed accessory structure is claimed to be needed to store equipment, produce, and
animals. If used as proposed, the additional accessory structure would reduce exterior
storage, of equipment on the property, possibly reducing as perceived nuisance.
14) The proposed use will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public
facilities and services and will not be detrimental to the economic welfare of the community.
The proposed use is expected to be served adequately by the aforementioned.
15) The proposed use will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials, equipment and
conditions of operation that will be detrimental to any persons, Property or the general
welfare because of excessive production of traffic, noise, smoke, fumes, glare or odors.
The proposed use is not expected to create additional requirements at public cost or be
detrimental to economic welfare.
16) Vehicular approaches to the property, where present, will not create traffic congestion or
interfere with traffic on surrounding public thoroughfares.
The proposed use will likely create not create traffic congestion or interfere with traffic on
surrounding public thoroughfares, provided conditions are met.
17) The proposed use will not result in the destruction, loss or damage of a natural or scenic
feature of major importance, NIA
IMIM-101
Based on the foregoing, the Applicant's application for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an
additional 2400 square -foot accessory structure on the property located at 5699 Keats Avenue
North is granted, subject to the following conditions:
1) The accessory structure must obtain all applicable permits, including a Valley Branch
Watershed District permit if applicable, building permit, and grading permit if moving more
than 50 cubic yards of material per acre.
Resolution 2016-092 3
2) The proposed structure shall not adversely affect drainage or cause excessive stminwater
runoff to neighboring properties.
3) The accessory structure must comply with all other building, zoning and City requirements
before a building permit is issued.
4) The accessory structure must not be used for storage of hazardous materials.
5) If applicable, the property must be in compliance with all Minnesota Pollution Control
Agency requirements.
6) Agricultural Sales Business operations are not permitted on the property unless an Interim
Use Permit is obtained for such a use.
7) The property must comply with all standards of Chapter 95: Animals and Chapter 96:
Nuisances, of the Zoning Code.
8) The property must maintain existing screening provided by trees on the west and south sides
of the property.
9) All farm equipment must be stored inside after use. Exterior storage shall be kept at a
minimum. Exterior storage or inoperable equipment is not allowed,
10) The use of the proposed additional accessory structure shall be restricted to agricultural
activities only,
11) The Conditional Use Permit shall become invalid if the property subdivides or is rezoned to a
higher -density zoning classification.
Passed and duly adopted this 18"' day of October, 2016 by the City Council of the City of Lake
Elmo, Minnesota.
7
tlichael Pearson, Mayor
Resolution 2016-092 4