The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About06-03-14 CCMPSource: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User CommunityLocation Map: 11991 30th Street North K010020050Feet Data Scource: Washington County, MN5-29-2014 1"=100' 11991 30th St. N. 3 0 t h S t . N. 456715 Manning Ave. N. § 154.405 ACCESSORY USES AND STRUCTURES. Accessory uses are listed in the Rural District Use Table as permitted or conditional accessory uses. Accessory uses and structures in the rural districts shall comply with the following standards and all other applicable regulations of this ordinance: A. Phasing. No accessory use or structure shall be constructed or established on any lot prior to the time of construction of the principal use to which it is accessory. B. Incidental to Principal Use. The accessory use or structure shall be incidental to and customarily associated with the principal use or structure served. C. Subordinate to Principal Use. The accessory use or structure shall be subordinate in area, extent, and purpose to the principal use or structure served. D. Function. The accessory use or structure shall contribute to the comfort, convenience, or necessity of the occupants of the principal use or structure served. E. Location. The accessory use or structure shall be located on the same zoning lot as the principal use or structure. (Ord. 2012-073, passed 3-19-2013) § 154.406 ACCESSORY STRUCTURES, RURAL DISTRICTS A. Size and Number. The maximum number and size of accessory buildings permitted in rural zoning districts are outlined in Table 9-3: Table 9-3: Accessory Buildings, Rural Zoning Districts Lot Size Maximum Structure Sizea (square feet) No. of Permitted Bldgs under 1 acre 1,200b 1 1 - 2 acres 1,200 1 2 – 5 acres 1,300 1 5 – 10 acres 2,000 2 10 – 15 acres 2,500 2 15 – 20 acres 3,000 2 20 – 40 acres 4,000 2 40+ acres Unregulatedc Unregulatedc Notes to Table 9-3 a. Maximum structure size accounts for the total maximum area allowed for all permitted accessory structures combined. IX - 8 b. The 1,200 square foot allowance is for the combined area of the attached and detached accessory structure or residential garage. c. To be allowed additional accessory buildings beyond two total buildings, the buildings must be agricultural buildings as defined in §154.213 or clearly serve an agricultural purpose in the judgment of the City. B. Additional Accessory Buildings. Allowances for additional accessory buildings in A and RR zones may be considered via a conditional use permit. C. Structure Height, Rural Districts. No accessory building shall exceed twenty-two (22) feet in height or the height of the principal structure, with the exception of buildings that are intended for a farming or other agricultural use in the judgment of the City. Building projections or features, such as chimneys, cupolas, and similar decorations that do not exceed twenty-five (25) feet in height are permitted in rural districts. D. Structure Location, Rural Districts. No detached garages or other accessory buildings shall be located nearer the front lot line than the principal building on that lot, unless, by Resolution of the City Council, an exception is made to permit a detached garage or accessory structure nearer the front lot line than the principal building. E. Exterior Design and Color. The exterior building materials, design and color of all accessory building or structures shall be similar to or compatible with the principal building, with the exception of the following accessory building or structures: 1. Detached domesticated farm animal buildings 2. Agricultural farm buildings 3. Pole buildings, as defined and regulated in §154.214. 4. Gazebos 5. Swimming pools 6. Other structures in which the required design is integral to the intended use, such as a greenhouse. F. Openings and Doors. Garage doors and other openings shall not exceed fourteen (14) feet in height for all accessory structures, with the exception of buildings that are intended for a farming or other agricultural use in the judgment of the City. G. Attached Garages, Size. Attached garages must not exceed the footprint size of the principal building. (Ord. 08-104, passed 3-18-2014) Penalty, see § 154.999 § 154.407 ACCESSORY USES. A. Exterior Storage in Residential Districts. All materials and equipment shall be stored within a building or be fully screened so as not to be visible from adjoining properties, except for the following: 1. Laundry drying IX - 9 From:Delise Conroy To:Nick Johnson Subject:Re: Accessory Building - 11991 30th St. N. Date:Wednesday, May 28, 2014 7:52:47 PM Hi Nick, Thanks for the the update. Unfortunately we aren't able to get the updated building plan to you by by tomorrow but will be happy to change the size of the proposed accessory building according to code. If we can proceed and make the adjustment at the time of the building permit, that would be great. In the meantime please let us know if there is anything else you need from us and thanks for all of your help!! Mike and Delise On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Nick Johnson <NJohnson@lakeelmo.org <mailto:NJohnson@lakeelmo.org> > wrote: Delise, I did receive your application. However, in reviewing the application, I noticed that the proposed building is 1500 square feet in size. The Code only allows 1,300 square feet for properties in rural zoning district between 2 and 5 acres in size. Please see the attached zoning code for clarification, I have highlighted the applicable section. In terms of how this impacts meeting the 6/3 Council Meeting, we can still proceed. However, if I can receive an updated building plan sometime tomorrow before the Council packet is completed, that would be helpful. If this is not possible, we can address this at the building permit. The important note is that the proposed building is too large per what is allowed under our Code. Let me know if you have any questions. Take care, Nick M. Johnson | City Planner City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota njohnson@lakeelmo.org <mailto:njohnson@lakeelmo.org> (w) 651-747-3912 <tel:651-747-3912> | (f) 651-747-3901 <tel:651-747-3901> www.lakeelmo.org <http://www.lakeelmo.org> -----Original Message----- From: Delise Conroy [mailto:dconroy1972@gmail.com <mailto:dconroy1972@gmail.com> ] Sent: Thursday, May 22, 2014 1:54 PM To: Nick Johnson Subject: Re: Accessory Building - 11991 30th St. N. Hi Nick, PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 4/14/14 AGENDA ITEM: 5C – BUSINESS ITEM CASE # 2014 - 20 ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment – Shoreland Ordinance Update SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is asked to review a draft Shoreland Ordinance intended to update the City’s shoreland provisions in advance of upcoming sewered growth in the community. The City will work with the DNR to review the draft ordinance in advance of a future public hearing. REQUEST DETAILS In an effort to update the City’s shoreland provisions in advance of future sewered growth, staff has produced a draft ordinance that would address all anticipated development activity in the future. The proposed ordinance is modeled after the City of Woodbury’s shoreland provisions. The reason that the City’s existing shoreland provisions must be updated is that they only address activities and performance standards for rural development types in shoreland areas. As the City moves towards more sewered growth, the shoreland provisions must be updated accordingly. For example, the City’s existing Shoreland Ordinance lists specific development standards by specific zoning district. Many of these zoning districts, such as R3, are longer in the City’s Zoning Code. Moving forward, staff would like to provide standards that relate to whether the lot is riparian or non-riparian, or whether or not the lot is sewered or unsewered. This approach is different from the existing provisions which list performance standards by zoning district. In addition, staff is proposing to bring the shoreland provisions into the Zoning Code (Chapter 154). TO update the Shoreland Ordinance to prepare for future sewered development, staff is proposing the following changes contained within the draft ordinance: • Permitted and conditional uses within shoreland areas has been updated to reflect the City’s updates list of use classifications and definitions (Article II – Definitions, §154.012). • The biggest change to the provisions relate to the shoreland standards, which include performance standards and lot size requirements for various forms of residential development. The shoreland standards have been updated with the following changes: o Maximum impervious surface requirements have been updated according to riparian vs. non-riparian lots and sewered vs. non-sewered lots. The only exception proposed is to maintain the 15% or 6,000 square-foot maximum BUSINESS ITEM 5C 2 standards for Rural Single Family (RS) lots. The reason for carrying this standard forward is that many RS lots are likely to get sewered within the City’s Sanitary Sewer Service Areas. o Lot size and width requirements have been updated according to riparian vs. non-riparian lots and sewered vs. unsewered lots. o Provision have been added to require riparian dedications of 150’ around both Goose and Kramer Lake, both of which are in the I-94 Corridor. Through the use of a riparian buffer, sewered development can proceed through the provisions of the base zoning district. Without this 150-foot riparian dedication, sewered developments would need to meet larger lot size requirements. These riparian dedications allow the City to take a more active role in ensuring surface water quality for public water bodies in and around developing areas. • Per a previous request by the DNR, staff is proposing to change the allowed height of water oriented accessory structures from 13 feet to 10 feet. This change would make the City’s ordinance consistent with the State model standard, as well as all other Metro communities researched by staff. The attached draft ordinance is the first attempt to update these provisions. The City still must review the proposed shoreland ordinance with the DNR. In addition, as staff is proposing to bring the shoreland provisions into the Zoning Code, a future public hearing will also be necessary. To help facilitate the review of the shoreland ordinance at the meeting and in the future, staff will create a shoreland map to show the location and extent of these areas. Staff intends to present this map at the Planning Commission meeting. RECCOMENDATION: No formal action is required at this time. The Planning Commission is asked to provide initial feedback regarding the draft shoreland ordinance. This feedback, along with DNR review, will inform a future draft, at which time staff intends to hold a public hearing. ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Shoreland Ordinance, dated 4/14/14 2. Existing Shoreland Ordinance (§150.250) ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction ........................................................................................ Planning Staff - Report by Staff ................................................................................... Planning Staff - Questions from the Commission ............................ Chair & Commission Members - Discussion by the Commission .............................. Chair & Commission Members BUSINESS ITEM 5C PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 5/28/14 AGENDA ITEM: 4A – PLANNING COMMISSION CASE # 2014 - 20 ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment – Shoreland Ordinance Update SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Community Development Director John Hanson, Valley Branch Watershed District SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is asked to hold a public hearing on a draft Shoreland Ordinance intended to update the City’s shoreland provisions in advance of upcoming sewered growth in the community. The Planning Commission reviewed the ordinance at the meeting on 4/28/14. Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval the draft shoreland ordinance. REQUEST DETAILS: The Planning Commission last reviewed the proposed shoreland ordinance on 4/28/14. At that meeting, staff explained the purpose of the ordinance update is to adopt shoreland standards for sewered properties in Lake Elmo. The existing Shoreland Ordinance does not address dimensional and bulk standards for properties that are sewered. Alternatively, the current ordinance contains standards for individual zoning districts as opposed to sewered vs. non- sewered properties. As the City is now planning for sewered growth in both the I-94 Corridor and Village Planning Areas, it is critical to update the City’s shoreland standards to account for these new types of land uses. In terms of the review of the draft shoreland ordinance that was presented to the Planning Commission, staff has updated the ordinance based upon the discussion and other refinements intended to improve the document. The proposed changes in the document can be identified in redlines. The proposed refinements to the ordinance include the following: • A definitions section was added to include key terminology that accompanies the shoreland standards. While the definitions of these terms are already included in the definition section of the City Code, staff thought it would be helpful to include these definitions in the ordinance itself. • Table 17-1 was updated to include the known Ordinary High Water Level (OHWL) of various lakes and surface waters in the community. While the OHWL for some water bodies is undetermined, staff thought it is helpful to include this information for known lakes in the ordinance as a reference, which the current ordinance also provides. • The list of public water bodies has been cross-referenced with the DNR’s listed public waters database. In addition, staff has provided an updated shoreland map (Attachment PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A – ACTION ITEM 2 #3) identifying the locations of the registered public waters and their associated shoreland districts. • The ordinance has been updated in the following areas in response to the review by the Valley Branch Watershed District: o Clarification was added to the title of Table 17-2 to identify what the abbreviation P (Permitted) and C (Conditional) refer to in terms of allowed land uses. o Table 17-3 was updated to reflect that the minimum low floor elevation allowed must be two feet above the 100-year flood elevation as opposed to Ordinary High Water Level. o Note c of Table 17-3 was updated to clarify that any exceptions to setback requirements must meet the rules and regulation of the applicable watershed district. o The section related to shoreland alterations was updated to reflect that all grading and filling activity must comply with the requirements of the Wetland Conservation Act. o Language was added to the section that relates to storm water management to clarify that wetlands and natural drainage ways should be used in a manner that is consistent with watershed district rules. • The section related to water-oriented accessory structures was amended to clarify that rooftop decks on top of accessory structures must not be enclosed with an additional roof. This clarification has been requested by the DNR in the past. These changes identified, most of which identified in redlines, summarize the refinements that have been completed by staff since the Planning Commission last reviewed the shoreland ordinance. In addition to some of these changes, the Planning Commission requested that staff review other public water bodies to see if any of them would benefit from required riparian buffering. In staff’s judgment, no other lakes in the community other than Goose and Kramer would benefit from these provisions, as these are the only two lakes that are directly adjacent to areas guided for urban development. In addition to the staff recommended changes, it should be noted that the Valley Branch Watershed District reviewed the proposed ordinance and submitted comments (Attachment #4). The draft ordinance was sent out to the DNR and the three watershed districts that are located in Lake Elmo (Valley Branch, Brown’s Creek and South Washington). At the time of drafting this staff report, staff has not received any comments from the DNR, Brown’s Creek Watershed District or the South Washington Watershed District. If any comments are submitted, staff will distribute the review comments electronically and address them at the Planning Commission meeting. RECCOMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the updated shoreland ordinance through the following motion: “Move to recommend approval of the updated Shoreland Ordinance (§154.800)” PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A – ACTION ITEM 3 ATTACHMENTS: 1. Draft Shoreland Ordinance (§154.800), dated 5/28/14 2. Existing Shoreland Standards (§150.250) (hard copies distributed previously) 3. Shoreland Map (Updated) 4. Valley Branch Watershed District Review Letter ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction ........................................................................................ Planning Staff - Report by Staff ................................................................................... Planning Staff - Open the Public Hearing .................................................................................. Chair - Close the Public Hearing .................................................................................. Chair - Questions from the Commission ............................ Chair & Commission Members - Discussion by the Commission .............................. Chair & Commission Members PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4A – ACTION ITEM LAKE ELMO LAKE JANE EAGLE POINT LAKE LAKE OLSON LAKE DEMONTREVILLE LONG LAKE SUNFISH LAKE HORSESHOE LAKE GOOSE LAKE DOWNS LAKE ROSE LAKE CLEAR LAKE KRAMER LAKE ARMSTRONG LAKE BROWN'S POND FRIEDRICH'S POND MARGARET LAKE Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, i-cubed, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping,Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, and the GIS User Community City of Lake Elmo5-22-2014Data Scource:Washington County, MN Shoreland Areas (Updated) - Lake Elmo, MN KShoreland District Lakes/Public Water Bodies Municipal Boundary