The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About08-06-13 CCMPTHE CITY Or tz,z\.KE ELI\ 0 ,rt,g4t, Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services in a Fiscally Responsible Manner While Preserving the City's Open Space Character NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, August 06, 2013 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo I 3800 Laverne Avenue North 5:30 PM Engineering/Council Study Session 6:45 PM Planning Commission Interview - Jill Lundgren AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call D. Order of Business E. Swearing in of Council Member Reeves F. Approval of Agenda G. Accept Minutes 1. Accept July 16, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes H. Public Comments/Inquiries I. Speak Your Peace - Council Member Smith J. Proclamation 2. Lake Elmo Days Proclamation K. Presentations 3. Recognition of Washington County Commissioner Gary Kriesel, Mike Polehna, and Wayne Sandberg for help with Storm Damage Consent Agenda 4. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 5. Approve rescheduling of November 5, 2013 Council Meeting 6. Authorization for John Schiltz to Dispense Beer and Wine Coolers at Lake Elmo Days Community Event on September 6 and 7, 2013 7. Appointment of Brett Emmons to the Library Board 8. Appointment of Council Member Nelson to the Economic Development Authority M. Regular Agenda 9. Consider Preliminary Plat -Lennar Homes/Savona; Resolution 2013-64 10. Lake Elmo Ave Infrastructure Improvements: I-94 to 30th St. - Accept Bids and Award Contract; Resolution 2013-59 11. Well 4 Connecting Watermain - Authorize Feasibility Report; Resolution 2013-60 12, Pumphouse No. 4 Improvements and Connecting Watermain - Authorize Plans and Specifications. Award Engineering Contract; Resolution 2013-61 13. Inwood Trunk Watermain & Booster Station - 2014 CIP Scope of Improvements. Authorize Feasibility Report; Resolution 2013-62 14. Presentation of Financing Plan for G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A; Approval of the issuance of the G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A; Resolution 2013-63 15. Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension - Discussion and Consideration of Project Alternatives 16. Consider Planning Commission Appointment 17. Consider Hiring Representation from a Lobbying Firm for the $2.6M state bonding request N. Summary Reports and Announcements Mayor • Council • City Administrator • City Attorney Planning Director • City Engineer • Finance Director • City Clerk O. Executive Session 18. Adjourn to Closed Session per MN State Statute 13D.05, Subd. 3(b) Attorney - Client Privilege regarding 3M litigation P. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:15 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Pearson, Council Members Bloyer, Nelson, and Smith. Also Present: City Administrator Zuleger, City Attorney Snyder, Planning Director Klatt, City Engineer Griffin, Finance Director Bendel, and City Clerk Bell. PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA Council Member Smith requested that Item H be moved to August 60. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO POSTPONE ITEM H TO THE AUGUST 6111 MEETING. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. In the spirit of Speak Your Peace, Mayor Pearson apologized for taking a shot at previous councils. He said he regrets it. Speak Your Peace is about taking responsibility, so he wants to do that. Mayor Pearson pulled Items 7 and 10 from the Consent Agenda for discussion. City Administrator Zuleger asked that a discussion with the City Attorney Snyder regarding the detachment appeal be added to executive session. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO APPROVE THE JULY 16, 2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA AS AMENDED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 1: ACCEPT MINUTES THE JULY 02, 2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WERE APPROVED AS AMENDED BY CONSENSUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC COMMENTS: Library Board President Steve DeLapp introduced the new Lake Elmo Library Director Linda Orsted. Ms. Orsted is originally from International Falls, MN and has a Masters in Library Science. She previously was the director of library near Pittsburgh, PA, and was in Marinette, WI before that. Ms. Orsted said she is excited to join the City and looks forward to helping the library be a part of the community. SPEAK YOUR PEACE: Tabled to 8/6. PRESENTATIONS None CONSENT AGENDA Page 1 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 2. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll in the amount of $499,391.22. 3. Accept Financial Report dated June 30, 2013 4. Accept Building Permit Report dated June 30, 2013 5. Approve Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements - Change Order No. 2. 6. Approve Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements - Pay Request No. 2. 7. Approve MnDOT Maintenance Agreoment (No. 01109) TH 5 Pedestrian Crossing; 8. Approve Encroachment Agreement - 12521 Marquess Way 9. Approve Encroachment Agreement - 11619 58th Street North 10. MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS AMENDED. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 7: APPROVE MNDOT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENLINO. 04109) - TH 5 PEDESTRIAN CROSSING; RES. 2013-54 City Engineer Griffin gave a summary of the project. Stated there will be a public open house on 8/21/2013. The project will include installing a crosswalk with a raised median. The City will be responsible for maintenance. This measure is expected to have a calming effect on the road. Mayor Pearson thanked staff and MnDOT for the hard work in getting this done. Council Member Nelson asked about cost savings if the flashing signal was included at this time, City Administrator Zuleger said that he has asked the Lake Elmo Elementary School PTA about cost sharing, but has not heard back yet. Council Member Smith asked about refuge for crossing guards. Mr. Griffin said that it is still a work in progress. Mr. Zuleger thanked MnDOT as well. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE ITEM 7 ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: RESOLUTION NO. 2013-54, APPROVING MNDOT MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT NO. 04109. Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0, ITEM 10: APPROVE MASTER ESCROW AGREEMENI City Administrator Zuleger explained the purpose and intent for the agreement. Going forward developers will deposit funds when submitting a development application. This will protect the City and staff for resources expended while reviewing applications. Council Member Nelson thanked staff for bringing forward. He stated that this is risk protection for the tax payer as well, MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE ITEM 10 THE MASTER ESCROW ON THE CONSENT AGENDA: THE 2013 CITY OF LAKE ELMO MASTER ESCROW AGREEMENT FOR MUNICIPAL SERVICES COMPLETE WITH EXHIBITS AND SUBJECT TO THE 2013 FEE SCHEDULE WHERE APPLICABLE. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0, REGULAR AGENDA ITEM 11: ACCEPT RESIGNATION OF COUNCIL MEMBER PARK AND DECLARING A VACANCYI RES, 2013-55 Page 2 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 City Clerk Bell provided the background and legal process defined by the Minnesota Statutes for accepting a resignation and declaring a vacancy. Council had no questions. Council Member Bloyer stated he was saddened to see Council Member Park go. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION NO. 2013-55, A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING RESIGNATION AND DECLARING A VACANCY. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 12: APPOINTMENT TO FILL COUNCIL MEMBER VACANCY: RES. 2013-56 City Clerk Bell summarized the background and explained the legal process defined by the Minnesota Statutes for city councils to fill vacancies. Council Member Bloyer noted that aside from a few specific issues, he and the candidates were generally in agreement. He stated that many of his preconceptions were eliminated during the conversations with the candidates. Council Member Smith noted her disappointment with not having more time to discuss. Council Member Nelson stated that all 4 candidates are qualified and that it is a tough decision. Mr. Bloyer read one of the questions that were asked to all the candidates during the interview. He Mr. Reeves responded with a tangible answer. Mr. Reeves wants to lead and had stated some of the achievements that we would like to accomplish during his tenure. Ms. Smith expressed her desire for more privacy in order to have more candid discuss. She stated she likes Ms. Fliflet for her ability to disagree with policy questions. Ms Smith also believes that Ms. Fliflet has the ability to "agree to disagree." In addition, Ms. Fliflet has the benefit of history and her experience. Mr. Bloyer took issue with the assertion of Ms. Fliflet's ability to agree to disagree. City Attorney Snyder suggested that the Council discuss what is liked or disliked about the responses and not the individual merits of each candidate. Mr. Nelson liked the representative republic question and stated that Mike Reeves offered the best answer in his opinion. Mr. Nelson also believed Mr. Reeves was collaborative and practical. Mayor Pearson stated that he likes Mr. Reeves. The Mayor also said he appreciates Ms. Fliflet's work and contributions in the past, but does not place as much value on history. He believes it can also be a negative at times. He thinks Mr. Reeves brings something beneficial to council, and the Council would do well to have Mike Reeves on. Ms. Smith reiterated Fliflet's experience. She noted that she wants to have a unanimous vote, but thinks that Ms. Fliflet would have been better choice. She likes Mike Reeves, but would prefer Julie Fliflet. Mayor Pearson stated that he does not believe a unanimous vote is needed. Not everyone can get over it, but he believes Mr. Reeves will. Mr. Pearson urged Ms. Smith to vote the way she wishes. Page 3 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 MOTION: Council Member Bloyer moved TO APPOINT MIKE REEVES TO THE COUNCIL FOR THE REMAINDER OF THE TERM PREVIOUSLY HELD BY COUNCIL MEMBER NICOLE PARK, AND HIS APPOINTMENT SHALL EXPIRE ON JANUARY 5, 2015. Mayor Pearson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 3-1 (SMITH NAY). Council Member Smith explained that she voted no because she would have chosen ex -Planning Commissioner Fliflet for her experience and knowledge. ITEM 13: SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS - APPROVE. REPORT AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY AND APPROVE PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS: RES. 2013-57. RES.2013-58 City Engineer Griffin gave an overview of the Section 34 project. The project includes 16 parcels owned by 9 property owners. Current proposals shown to staff are by Amaris, Savona (Lennar), and Hammes Estates (Ryland). Grading has been an issue due to timing and coordination. As a result, sewer will mostly hug the 194 corridor. The City will be extending sewer and water to this area. The sewering will consist of a gravity sewer and forcemain. The forcemain costs are only being shared by a portion of the Lennar development. The gravity sewer costs will be shared by all. Mr. Griffin explained the sewer improvement costs. Total is $1,706,000. Parcel 1 b withdrew from the service area. The possibility of that parcel later corning back on board was discussed. Parcel la theoretical costs were capped. It was explained that it was not receiving benefit. Mr. Griffin explained the water improvement costs. Total is $1,706,000. Grand total for both sewer and water is $2,378,200. Sewer and water are enterprise funds and are self operating with 100% assessed to developments. Mr. Griffin explained that easements are still needed. So far the owners have offered no cost agreements. It was also explained that the waivers should be obtained now. Council Member Smith asked about the 1,092 REC units in Section 34 when the entire south of 1001 street is only planned for 3,200. Planning Director Klatt explained that the number also includes commercial. 1,300 commercial REC units are included in the total 3,200. City Administrator Zuleger said that most of the MOU relief will come in residential RECs due to market conditions. Ms. Smith is concerned that the south of 10th density could get too high. She stated she does not want 5,000- 6,000 housing units in along 194. It was explained that the current proposal is actually lower than the MOU with only about 2.75 RECS per acre. The MOU is 3.2 RECs per acre. Council Member Nelson asked for the commercial versus residential REC numbers for the area. Staff said that it would be provided to him. Council Member Bloyer asked if the REC units ever did get higher, would it be a comp plan amendment. Mr. Zuleger responded that it would. Mr. Griffin recommended that all the easements be obtained at no cost to city. The assessments would be at a 15 yr at 2% over city bond rate. It was then explained that if the City received 100% waiver rate, a public hearing is not needed. If not 100% waived, a hearing is required. On September 3rd, staff will present bids and council will be asked to award project. Page 4 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 Mr. Nelson asked about a possible outlier and how it would work. What exposure would city have financially? City Attorney Snyder stated that Council would have to decide whether to do project or not. Mr. Snyder explained legal process. It is both the attorney and engineer's belief that an outlier is unlikely. Recovering those costs at a later date was discussed. Mr. Nelson asked about costs changing and how it is split. Griffin explained that once hearing takes place, the City can decrease the costs but not increase. Mr. Bloyer noted an email from a resident who had concerns about their sewer. Some residents may feel forgotten if left out of these projects. Mr. Bloyer stated that this Council is very cognizant of the issues, and that roads and sewers are being approved and getting built. Mr. Nelson reported that he also received the same email. Mr. Zuleger reiterated that these projects are enterprise funds and will not affect tax rate. MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2013-57, RECEIVING THE FEASIBILITY REPORT AND CALLING HEARING ON IMPROVEMENT FOR THE SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO ADOPT RESOLUTION 2013-58, APPROVING THE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING THE ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR THE SECTION 34 WATER AND SEWER UTILITY EXTENSION IMPROVEMENTS. Council Smith seconded the ?notion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Council Member Bloyer left chambers at 8:30PM. ITEM 14: 2012 FINAL AUDIT REPORT REVIEW. Finance Director Bendel explained the background of changing audit firms. Jason Miller, from city auditors Smith, Schafer & Associates, presented the audit report. He thanked Dean, Cathy, and staff. Smith, Schafer & Associates has issued an unqualified opinion. This is the highest opinion. It was explained that the auditors also tested for MN legal compliance. Mr. Miller explained the types of funds the city has. These basically consist of General Funds and Enterprise Funds. Council Member Bloyer returned to chambers at 8:37PM. Mr. Miller explained the City revenues. Property taxes are the main source of revenue. He then explained expenditures. He spoke about the unassigned general fund balance. 2012 is at 88%. 2013 is at 900/0. It was explained why it is desirable. The total outstanding bonds and certificates were at $16,905,000 on 12/31/12. Mr. Miller went over the management letters, which included the following conclusions: No difficulties were encountered. No corrected or uncorrected misstatements. No disagreements with management. No management consultation with other accountants (potentially opinion shopping). The Internal Control Management Letter noted the following significant deficiencies: limitations due to city size on duty segregation; reconciliation of investment accounts to general ledger; and utility billing software. Council Member Nelson asked about the utility billing software. City Administrator Zuleger explained that staff does want to have a discussion about converting and costs and timing. Within Page 5 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 the next few years new package is needed. Conversion is the greatest challenge. It is inefficient to have two software programs that do not talk. Most likely, this upgrade will be a 2015 budget requ est. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO ACCEPT THE 2012 YEAR-END ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT AND MANAGEMENT LETTERS. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Mayor Pearson called for a point of privilege at 8:54PM. Meeting reconvened at 8:58PM ITEM 15: COUNCIL RETREAT AGENDA UPDATE City Administrator Zuleger provided an update of the retreat agenda. Modifications were pre and post meeting sessions scheduled for the Council. Mr. Zuleger presented the overview of the final agenda. There was no Council discussion or formal action. ITEM 16: ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT - FENCE ORDINANCE: ORD. 08-086 Council Member Nelson asked if an immediate motion was appropriate as Council has already discussed this subject for two months. Council Member Smith noted that the word "wall" should be removed from Section E.2 as it is redundant and this correction was previously noted. MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE ORDINANCE 08-086, ESTABLISHING NEW FENCING REGULATIONS IN THE LAKE ELMO ZONING CODE. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0 MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO DIRECT STAFF TO REPORT TO COUNCIL THE NUMBER OF FENCES APPLIED FOR AND WHAT TYPE IN ORDER TO HAVE A QUARTERLY ORDINANCE REVIEW PROCESS, Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion, MOTION PASSED 4-0 SUMMARY REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member Nelson - reported attending Valley Cartage ribbon cutting. Though it is a great building and business. Council Member Smith - no report. Mayor Pearson - reported attending Valley Cartage ribbon cutting as well; EDA had a great meeting and seems to be a great group; attended library board meeting; at the next council meeting he wants to appoint Brett Emmons to the library board; thanked council applicants. Encouraged applicants to continue pursuing the path of service to Lake Elmo. Council Member Bloyer - reported meeting with residents regarding brush clean up; learned about the weir. City Administrator Zuleger - reported working on master escrow agreement; code enforcement is progressing and also increasing as expected. Hardy property is turned over to the county due to tax forfeiture issues; regarding the lake issue - MNDNR said no EAW needed; Staff continues to meet with developers. Three active projects in the Old Village being proposed; Public Works is still actively cleaning brush. Still planning to have round table to discuss action; Council Member Smith recommended that residents bring brush to Public Works facility at this point. It was noted that Washington County has been very helpful in accommodating the cleanup Page 6 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES July 16, 2013 efforts. Council Member Bloyer asked about the City's exit -strategy. Ms. Smith said it should be done now and the remaining brush should be brought to the Public Works facility. City Attorney Snyder - no update. Planning Director Klatt - reported submitted Village Comp Plan to Met Council. Been dealing with MAC on safety zones; reviewing Savona preliminary plat. Planning commission will hold public hearing on the plat on 7/29; reported that the Gateway Corridor Commission needs another alternate. Who will serve was discussed. Council Member Smith volunteered to serve on it. City Engineer Griffin - reported on TH 5 effort. Working to get turn lane put back in. Hilton trail interchange project. Hilton Trail will be closed starting this week and through September. HWY 36 will remain open. Rain gardens were discussed. It was agreed that the program would be looked at and reevaluated. There is an issue of some gardens failing and both the Washington County Conservation District and Valley Branch Watershed District are pushing back on funding. Council Member Nelson asked for an update on the Olson Lake Trail sewer project. Mr. Griffin said that there has not been much progress. The City is still waiting to hear back. There is also a shortage of contractors for the volume of work out there. Finance Director Bendel - reported working on bonding documentation; budget. 8/13 workshop scheduled; Water bilis will be going out soon. Public Works not been able to do the meter reads due to the storm clean up and equipment issues; There will be a couple City Clerk Bell - Notified the council about a pending insurance claim related to an injury at the library. The League of MN Cities will be paying the medial claim, but nothing else. The city has not other liability anticipated. There was a discussion of when to reschedule the November 5, 2013 meeting. It was agreed to reschedule to Wednesday, November 6, 2013. MOTION: Mayor Pearson moved TO CLOSE MEETING AND ENTER EXECUTIVE SESSION PER MINNESOTA STATUTE 13D.0.5, SURD. 3(B) ATTORNEY CLIENT PRIVILEGE REGARDING CITY OF LAKE ELMO V. 3M CORPORATION AND THE DETACHMENT APPEAL. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Meeting adjourned to executive session at 9:30 P.M. ATTEST: Adam R. Bell, City Clerk LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor Page 7 of 7 CITY OF LAKE ELMO LAKE ELMO DAYS PROCLAMATION WHEREAS: The City has many volunteers who serve countless hours to make the City of Lake Elmo a better place to live and work, WHEREAS: The City acknowledges their commitment and dedication, WHEREAS: The City wishes to express appreciation for their efforts, WHEREAS: The City also celebrates "Community" by bringing families, friends, and neighbors together to enjoy many festivities, NOW, THEREFORE, I. Mike Pearson, Mayor of Lake Elmo, do hereby proclaim Friday, September 6th and Saturday, September 7th, 2013. as the second annual Lake Elmo Days to distinguish Lake Elmo from all the other surrounding Cities. SIGNED THIS SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST Two THOUSAND AND THIRTEEN. BY: Mike Pearson Mayor 11-11,1 CITY OF K E E LMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the Amount of $456,662.14 SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator 8/06/2013 4 SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED; As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $456,662.14. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operation. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # Amount Description ACH $ 10,015.38 Payroll Taxes to IRS & MN Dept of Revenue 7/25/13 ACH $ 5,420.48 Payroll Retirement to PERA 7/25/13 DD4788— D481 1 $ 28,276.81 Payroll Dated (Direct Deposits) 7/25/13 40137 40135-40136 $ 150.00 Accounts Payable 7/17/13 40138-40144 $ 25,026.73 Accounts Payable 7/30/13 40145-40204 $ 386,572.74 Accounts Payable 8/06/13 2043-2062 $ 1,200.00 Library Card Reimbursement 8/06/13 TOTAL $ 456662.14 STAFF REPORT: City staff has complied and reviewed the attached set of claims. All appears to be in order and consistent with City budgetary and fiscal policies and Council direction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda proposed disbursements in the amount of $456,662.14 Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda or a particular claim from this item and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the August 06, 2013, Disbursements as Presented [and mor4fiedi herein." ATTACHMENTS: . Accounts Payable Check Registers SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (ifremoved from the.._cop.spo Agqzdq): - Questions from Council to Staff .......... ............................ ....... Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion Mayor & City Council - Discussion Mayor & City Council - Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates 2 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: denise Printed: 07/1 7/2013 - 2:27 PM Bate!): 010-07-2013 invoice # Inv Date OLSENDAN Olsen Dal-tette July 17 2013 07/17/2013 206-450-5300-43150 Contract Services July 172013 Total: OLSENDAN Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 150.00 0.00 07/17/2013 Speaker for Library - July 17 2013 150.00 150.00 Report Total: 150.00 AP - To Bc Paid Proof List 107/17/13 - 2:27 PM) No 0000 Page 1 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: denise Printed: 07/30/2013 - 1:42 PM Batch: 012-07-2013 Invoice # Inv Date LEO[L Lake Elmo Oil, Inc. 12325 (>7/16/21)13 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 12325 Total: 12326 07/16/2013 101-430-3 120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 12326 Total: 12327 07/16/2013 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 12327 Total: 12328 07/16/2013 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 12328 Total: LEOIL Total: NLXTEL Nextel C'ornmunications 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-410-1940-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-420-2400-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-450-5200-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 101-410-1450-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 07/18/2013 I01-410-1910-43210 Telephone 761950227-124 Total: NEXTEL Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (07/30/13 - 1:42 PM) Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference 1,490.25 1,490.25 2,771.86 2,771.86 2,801.25 2,801.25 369.58 369.58 7,432.94 0.00 07/30/2013 Fuel 0.00 07/30/2013 Fuel 0.00 07/30/2013 Fuel 0.00 07/30/2013 Fuel 112.48 0.00 07/30/2013 Cell Phone Service - Administration 222.91 0.00 07/3(1/2013 Cell Phone Service - Fire Dept 44.62 0.00 07/30/2013 Cell Phone Service - Building Dept 31.29 0.00 07/30/2013 Cell Phone Service - Public Works Dept 90.80 0.00 07/30/2013 Cell Phone Service - Parks Dept 57.56 0.00 07/30/2013 Cell Phone Service - Taxpayer Services 15.65 0.00 07/30(2013 Cell Phone Service - Planning Dept 575.31 575.31 Task Type PO # Close POLine # No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 1 Invoice # I 11V Date RIVRCOOP River Country Cooperative 06302013 06/30/21)13 101-420-222(1-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 06302013 Total: RIVRCOOP Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 525.90 0.00 07/30/2013 Fuel - Fire Department No 0000 525.90 525.90 ins TDS kletrocom - LLC' 651-779=8882 07/13/2013 139.42 0.00 07/30/2013 Analog Lines - Fire Dept No 0000 101-420-2220-43210 Telephone 651-779=8882 07/13/2013 224.99 0.00 07/30/2013 Analog Lines - Public Works Dept No 0000 101-430-3100-43210 Telephone 651-779=8882 07/13/2013 129.27 0.00 07/30/2013 Analog Lines - Lift Station Alarms No 0000 602-405-9450-43210 Telephone 651-779=8882 07/13/2013 45.30 0.00 07/30/2013 Analog Lines- Well House #2 No 0000 601-494-9400-43210 Telephone 651-779=8882 Total: 538.98 TDS Total: 538.98 TKDA IKDA, Inc. 002013000971 05/12/2013 6,713.46 0.00 07/30/2013 LE lnfr Imp Plans & Specifications No 0000 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 03.30 002013000971 Total: 6,713,46 TKDA Total: 6,713,46 VOLF1RE Volunteer Firefigliter's Assn 07192013 07/19/2013 302.00 0.00 07/30/2013 Renewals - Fire Dept No 0000 101-420-2220-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 07192013 Total: 302.00 VOLFIRE Total: 302.00 WA SIITAX Washington County 76453 05/13/2013 4,638.14 0.00 07/30/2013 Manufactured Ilomes 2013 No 0000 101-41(1-1320-4310(1 Assessing Services Assessments 76453 05/13/2013 4,300.00 0.00 07/30/2013 Legal Property Tax Appeals 2013 No 0000 101-410-1320-43100 Assessing Services 76453 Total: 8,938.14 WASHTAX Total: 8,938.14 Report Total: 25,026.73 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (07/30/13 - 1:42 PM) Page 2 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: den ise Printed; 08/01/2013 - 11:08 AM Batch: 013-07-2013 Invoice # NY Date Amount Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # AGEFRAFF ACT Traffic Solutions Inc 6130 04/30/2013 1,640.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Road Counters No 0000 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 6130 'Fotal: 1,640.00 ACTTRAFT Total: 1,640.00 ADVAD1SP Advanced Disposal Services G50002996698 06/30/2013 4,481.33 0.00 07/31/2013 Clean Up Day 6/8/2013 No 0(100 101-430-310U-41380 Clean-up Days G50002996698 Total: 4,481.33 ADVADISP Total: 4.181.33 BIFFS BifTs W496361-496370- 06/26/2013 801.29 0.00 07/31/20 13 Portable Restroows No 01)(10 101-450-5200-44120 Rentals - Buildings W496361-496370- Total: 801.29 BUTS Total: 8UI .29 13OUTIR),11 Bouthilet Michael 05282013 1)5/28/2013 41.90 0.00 07131/2013 Amazon 10 ea Basketball Goal Nets 101-450-5200-44030 Repairs/Main( Imp Not Bldgs 05287013 O5/28/2013 92.32 0.00 07/31/2(113 Amazon 4 ea Webbed Basketball Goal 101-450-5200-44030 Repairs/IVIaint Imp Not Bldgs Nets 05282013 Total: 134.22 BOUTI {MI Total: 134.22 BRAUN Braun I ntertec Corporation 6(12634 07/18/2013 1,783.81 409-480-8000-13030 Engineering Services 602634 07/18/2013 1,345.69 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services AP - To Be Paid Proof List 08/0 Ul 3 11:08 AM) 0.00 07/31/2(113 Keats M SA Street 0.00 07/31/2013 keats Trunk Watermain No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 1 Invoice # Inv Date 602634 Total: BRAUN Total: CAPRA Capra's Utilities Inc. 3015 07/23/2013 602-495-9450-44030 Repairs\ Maint Imp Not 131dgs 3045 lotal: CAPRA Total: CARDMEN111 Cardinernber Service 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44'300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-41(1-1320-4430(1 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/7013 07/19/2013 101-450-5200-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44370 Conferences & Training 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1910-44300 Miscellaneous 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 07/19/2013 07/19/2013 101-410-1450-44370 Conferences & Training 07/19/2013 Total: CARDMEM13 Total: CARPEN Carpenter's Small Engine 21677 0702/2013 101-420-2220-42400 Small Tools & Equipment 21677 07/22/2013 101-420-2220-42400 Small Tools & Equipment 21677 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 3.129.50 3,1.29.50 3.775.0(1 0.00 07/31/201.3 Sewer Service Repair 109097 32nd Street 3,775.00 3,775.00 26.06 0.00 07/31/2013 Misc.' Meal 6/21 D Zuleger 5.00 0,00 07/31/2013 Misc Meal 6/23 1) Zuleger 10.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Parking Receipt - 6/2(1I) Zuleger 10.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Parking Receipt - 6/20 D Zuleger 110,07 0.00 07/31/2013 FedEx Off- Outdoor Banner No Wake Zul 196.83 0.00 07/31/2013 Horsager leadership Trusl Edg Wk- Zuleg 10,00 0.00 07/31/2013 Parking Receipt - 6/20/13 - A Bell 16.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Parking Receipt - 7/10/13 - A Bell 33.94 0.00 07/31/2013 FedEx Office - K Klatt 25.99 0.00 07/31/2(113 0.1 Wall St Journal dated 7/10/13 - Bende 249.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Alliance for Innovation Maeleod-C Bendel 692.89 692.89 363.87 156.38 520.25 0.00 07/31/2(113 21677-1sharpen/Inew chain for Venn -mister 0.00 07/31/2013 #22468-2 new chains for chainsaw No 0000 No 0000 No ONO No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No U000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No No 0000 0000 Page 2 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # CARPEN Total: 520.25 CARQIIEST Car Quest Auto Parts 7(155-2941125 (17/12/2(113 101-450-5200-422 I() Equipment Parts 2055-2941125 Totah 2055-295533 07/29/2013 601-494-9400-44030 Repairs Main( Imp Not Bldgs 2055-295533 Total: CARQUFST Total: coupwaL Coldwell Banker Commercial 36871 06/19/2013 206-450-5300-44030 Repairs/Maint Imp Not Bldgs 36871 Total: COLDWELL Total: COMCA ST Cornetist 20130724 07/24/2013 101-410-1940-43210 Telephone 20130724 Total: CCMCAST Total: COTTAPAR Coltnewood Partners 07162013 07/16/2013 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07162013 Total: COTTAPAR Total: CTVOAKDA City of Oakdale 2(113(17093735 07/09/2013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 201307093735 Total: CIA/OAK DA Total: 110.01 0.00 07/31/2013 91 Dodge Repair Parts 110.01 87.77 0.00 07/31/2013 Battery 07-1 87.77 197.78 112.50 0.00 07/31/2013 I I VAC Repair 112.50 112.50 No 0000 No 0010 No 0000 13.93 0.00 07/31/2013 Updating City Hall Cable No 0000 13.93 13.93 1,000.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Refund Escrow 10024 Tapestry Rd No 0000 1.000.01) 1,000.00 1,081,35 0.00 07/31/2013 CV -I. Exhaust. Sway Bar, Battery System 1,081.35 1081.35 DEMC( Done° 5021394 07/15/2013 141.77 0.00 07/31/2013 5-Box Non Glare Label Pro & Paper 206-450-5300-42500 Library Collection Maintenance Spine 5021394 Total: 141.77 AP - To Be Paid Proof Lisl 108/0113 - 11:08 AM) No 0(100 No 0000 Page 3 Invoice # lily Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 51)28977 07/23/2013 206-450-5300-45800 Other Equipment 5028977 Total-. DEMCO Total: DIVINEHO Divine Homes 07/23/2013 07/23/2013 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07/23/2013 Total: DIV [NEW Total: E.G.RIJD E.O. Rud & Sons. Inc. 27637 07/02/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 27637 Total: E.G.RUD Total: EMERGAUT Emergency Automotive Tech, Inc AW061113-13 07/24/2013 101-420-2220-44040 R epairs/Maint Eqpt AW(161 1 13-13 Total: MS062113-2 07/24/2013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt MS062113-2 Total: MS072413-9 07/24/2013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Mainl Eqpt MS072413-9 Total: EMERGAUT Total: FIORILLO Fiorillo Megan Cable Operator 07/16/2013 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations Cable Operator Total: FIORILLO Total: FOCUS Focus Engineering. Inc. 705 & 706 07/29/2013 101-410-1930-43030 Engineering Services 705 & 706 07/29/2013 101-410-1910-43030 Engineering Services 705 & 706 Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) 246.57 0,00 07/31/2013 Bookends including shipping & tax 246.57 388.34 4,000,00 0.00 07/31/2013 Refund Escrow #8422 11619 58th Si 4,000.00 4 ,000.00 195.50 0,00 07/31/2013 Welt No 4-Stake Well Location Co I &actor 195.50 195.50 156.75 0.00 07/31/2013 Parts for Light on El 75.42 0.00 07/31/2013 Parts for Light on El 41.86 0.00 07/31/2013 Parts for Light on El 156.75 75.42 41.86 274.03 55.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Cable Operations 7/16/13 CC Meeting 4brs 55.00 55.00 1,841.16 192.50 7.033.66 0.00 07/31/2013 General Engineering 0.00 07/31/2013 General Engineering - Planning No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 4 Invoice t Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLin e # 707 07/29/2013 I 01-420-2400-43030 Engineering 707 07/29/2013 101-4E0-1910-43030 Engineering Services 707 07/29/2013 101-430-3100-43030 Engineering Services 707 07/79/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 707 07/29/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering. Services 707 07/29/2013 603-496-9500-43030 Engineering Services 707 Total: 708 07/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 07/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 (17/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 07./29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 (17/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 07/79/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 0709/7013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 708 Total: 709 07/29/2013 413-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 709 Total: 710 07/29/2013 420-4 . 0 Engineering Services 710 -rota': 711 07/29/2013 419-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 711 Total: 712 07/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 712 Total: 713 07/29/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 713 07/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 713 Total: AP - to Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 11:08 ANi) 573.00 2.079,46 7,756.51 4,835.97 8,139.6'7 1,282,50 544.12 457.00 1.530.50 467.15 1,576.00 0.00 07%31/2013 General Engineering-VILA-Building 0.00 07/31/2013 General Engineering-VRA-Plannin 0.00 07/3 I /2013 General Engineering-VRA-PW 0.00 07/31/2013 General Engineering-VRA-Water 0.00 0731/2013 General Engineering-VRA-Sewer 0.00 07/31/2013 General Engineering-VRA-Surface Water 5,857.27 495.12 0.00 07/31/2013 Transportation & Traffic System 4,734.79 0.00 07/31/2013 Street Maintenance 232.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Municipal Aid System 88.50 0.00 07/31/2013 Capital Improvement Planning 2,131.26 0.00 07/31/2013 29.50 0.00 07/31/2013 2013 seal Coat Project MNDot Hilton Trail Interchange 428.50 0.00 07/31/2013 State Ilwy5 Traffic Mgmt & Safety Improv 29.50 0.00 07/31/2013 Lake Elmo Area Village Eng Support 29.50 885.62 0.00 07/31/2013 10th Street Infrastructure Planning 885.62 831.40 831.40 (1.00 07/31/2013 Demontrevil le Highlands Area Street Impr 573.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Olson Lake Trail Sewer Extension Feasih 0,00 07/31/2013 Keats Ave Watermain 43% 0.00 07/31/2013 Keats Avenue Street 57% No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 5 Invoice # Env Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type P() # Close POLine # 714 07/29/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 714 Total: 715 07/29/2013 409-480-S000-43030 Engineering Services 715 Total: 716 07/29/2013 661-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 716 Total: 717 07/29/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 717 0709/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering, Services 717 Total: 718 (17/29/21)13 203-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 718 Total: 719 07/29/2013 607-495-9450-43030 Engineering Services 719 Total: 770 07/29/7013 203.490-9070-13030 Engineering Services 720 Total: 721 07/29/2013 203-490-9(170-43030 Engineering Services 721 Total: 722 07/29/2013 203-490-9070-431)30 Engineering Services 722 Total: FOcHS Total: HEEKE.STR IleIke's Tree Service 111041 07/22/2013 101-430-3250-43 150 Contract Services 111041 'Total: IIELKESTR 'Total: HOLIDAYC Holiday Credit Office 07152013 07/15/2013 101-420-2220-42120 Luel, Oil and Fluids 07152013 Total: HOLIDAYC Total: Al' - To 13e Paid Proof List (,08/01/13 1:08 AM) 3,223,24 3.223.74 196.00 196.00 627.50 627.50 1,194.60 1,791.90 2,986.50 1,586.0(1 1,586,00 442.50 442.5(1 308.56 308.56 119.50 119.50 574.06 574.06 33,749.95 10,950.00 10,950.00 10,950.00 361.24 361.24 361.24 0.00 07/31/2013 LE Ave Infrastructure 1-94 to 30t1i Stree 0.00 07/31/2013 Water System Funding Activities (DEEDS) 0.00 07/31/2013 Production Well Number 4 0.00 07/31/2013 Section 34 Water 40% 0.00 07/31/2013 Section 34 Sewer Extension 60% 0.00 07/31/2013 Lenriar 1-94 West Corridor 0.00 07/31/2013 CSAH 15(Manning AvelCorridor Mgwt & Safe 0.00 07/31/2013 Amaris Homes (Montgomery Property) - 0.00 07/31/2013 Hammes Estate 0.00 07/31/2013 Landucci Properly (Ryland) 0.00 07/31/2013 Clam Truck -Storm debris removal 0.00 07/31/2013 Fuel - Fire Department No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 6 Invoice # Inv Date INTERSTA Interstate All Battery Ctr 55087 07/22/2013 101420-222(1-424(40 Small Tools & Fritdimwit 55087 07/22/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Mai nt Bldg 55087 Total: INTERSTA Total: JOHNS() Johnson Kevin Cable Operator 07/29/2(113 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations Cable Operator Total: JOILNSO Total: Kt. NIENG KLM Engineering; Inc. 4883 06/27/2013 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 4883 Total: KLMENG Total: LANDMARK Landmark. Inc. 07-16-2013 (17/16/2(113 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07-16-2013 Total: LANDMARK 'Foal: LANDTITL, Land Title Inc 406406 07/21/2013 61)2-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406406 Total: 406410 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406410 "Fotal: 406412 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406412 Total: 406413 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406413 Total: 406414 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406414 Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference 19.30 0,00 07/31/2(113 Replacement l3attery for Flashlight 10,67 0.00 07/31/20E3 Replacement Battery emergency lite Stal 55.00 0.00 07/3112013 Cahle Operations-7/29/13 Plaint Comm thrs 29.97 29.97 55.00 55.00 2,0(10.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Construction Review AT & T Anteimallpgrad 2.000.00 2,000.00 4.950,00 0.00 07/31/2013 Refund Escrow #8457 11797-56th St 4,950,00 4,950.00 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for DantianAlontgomery 75.00 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Star River Holdings 75.00 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Lampert Yards 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Gatsby Investors 0,00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Dale Properties 75.00 75,00 75,00 75.00 Al' - To I3e Paid Proof List t08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) Task Type PO # Close POLine # No No No No No 0000 01)00 0000 0000 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 7 Invoice ft Inv Date AmountQuantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 406419 07/24/2(113 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406419 Total: 4064 )0 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406420 Total: 4(16421 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406421 Total: 406423 07/74/2013 602-495-945043150 Contract Services 406423 iota]: 406424 07/24/2013 602-495-94.50-43150 Contract Services 406424 Total: 406425 07/241201.3 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406425 Total: 4106427 07/24/2013 602-495-9450-43150 Contract Services 406427 Eotal: LANDT114. rota!: MALMQ Malmquist Greg 07/18/2013 07/18/2013 101-420-2220-44370 Conlgrences &. Training 07/18/2013 Total: MALMQ Total: MENARDSO Menards - Oakdale 22155 07/12/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Rcpairs/Maint Bldg 22155 "lotali MENARDSO Total: 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Dale Properties 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Walter Ebertz 75.00 0.00 07131/2013 Property Reports for Walter Ebertz 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for CM Properties 75.0(1 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for MFC Properties 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.00 75.0(1 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Frandsen 13k & Trust 75,00 75.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Property Reports for Wm Itannnes 75.00 900,00 103.74 0.00 07/31/2013 Mileage/Mcals Reitnb All Hazzard 7/15- 18 103.74 103.74 MES Municipal Emergency Svs, Inc. 00429580-SNV 07/09/2013 101-420-2220-42400 Small Tools & Equipment 00429580-SNV lotal: MES Al' - To 13Q. Paid Proof' List (08/01/13 - 1:08 AM) 25.18 0.00 07/31/2013 Station 42 Supplies Fire Dept 25.18 25.18 186.09 186.09 186.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Barricade Tape - Fire Department No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 (WOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 8 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # MINNCI-IFM Minnesota Chemical Company. 419716 07/15/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 419716 lora': MINNCHEM Total: MNDOT Commissioner of Transportation P00001936 07/73/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services p00001936 Total: NINDO1' Total: fv1NUNEMPL. MN Dept Economic Security 8706494-106-002 07/09/2013 101-410-1320-41420 Unemployment Benefits 8706194-106-002 1 otal: MNUN EWE Total: 159.62 0,00 07/31/2013 Service Call Washer at Sta 42-Fire Dept 159.62 159.62 142.71 0.00 07/31/2013 Keats MS A Street 142.71 142.71 963.32 0.00 07/31/2013 Unemployment Benefits Quarter 2 -2013 963.32 963.32 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 1v1URRYR.EN Murray Renee July 10 2(113 07/1(0013 331.20 0.00 07/31/2013 Reimbursement Books for Collection No 0000 206-450-5300-42500 Library Collection Maintenance July 10 2013 Total: 331.2() MURRYREN lotal 331.20 (*STEM] Orsted Linda 07/24/2013 07/24/2013 80.00 0.00 07/31/2013 MNLihrary Assn Annual Dues - Or • ed No 0000 206-450-5300-44330 Ducs & Subscriptions 07/24/2013 Total: 80,00 ORS FEW Total: 80.00 OVERHEAD Overhead Door Company 793663 07/15/2013 101-430-3100-44010 Repairs/Main! Bldg 793663 Total: OVERHEAD Total; 1,187.25 0.00 07/31/2013 Garage Door Repair No 0000 1,187.25 1,187.25 P1ONEERP Pioneer Press 613520397 ((7/10/2013 590.80 0.00 07/31/2013 City Notices/Public Hearings 6/1/13- 101-410-1450-43510 Public Notices 6/30 613520397 'Fatal: 590.80 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) No 0000 Page 9 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close I'OLine P1ONEERP Total: 590.80 poSTOF H. Postmaster July 30 2013 07/30/2013 404-480-8000-43050 Other Park Ded Prof Services July 30 2013 'Total: POSTOFF1 Total: [02.50 0.00 07/31/2013 Surveys - Park 102.50 102.50 RENEFFNDT Ref-111111cl Terry 4 07/16/2013 405.00 0.00 07131/2013 Building Inspector Services 7/12 & 101-420-2400-43150 Inspector Contract Services 7/15 4 07/16/2(113 35.03 0.00 07/31/2013 Building Inspector Mileage 7/12 & 101-420-2400-4331() Mileage 7/15 4 Total: 440,03 RENLUNDT 'Fotalt 440.03 S&'F S& T Office Products, Inc. 01PW4175 07/16/2013 14.70 0.00 07/31/2013 Office Supplies -Building 101-420-2400-42000 Office Supplies 01PW4175 07/16/2013 0.3 l 0.00 0713112013 Office Supplies -Fire Department 101-420-2220-42000 Office Supplies 01 PW4175 Total: 15.01 0 1[3W/9024 07/22/2013 264.70 0.00 07/31/2013 Office Supplies -Administration 101-410-I320-42000 Office Supplies 01PW9024 07/22/2013 35.12 0,00 07/31/2013 Office Supplies -Building 101-420-2400-42000 Office Supplies 01PW9024 Total: 299.82 UIPX0011 ((7/24/2013 2.14 0.00 07/31/2013 Office Supplies -Administration 101-110-1320-42000 Office Supplies 01 PX0011 Total: 2.14 S&T Total: 316.97 SACFISJIM Jaws Sachs 07312013 07/14/2013 101-430-3100-44170 Uniforms (17312013 Total: SACFISJIM Total: SAMSCLUB Sant's Club 07102013 07/10/2013 101-420-2220-42000 Office Supplies AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - I 1:08 AM) 81,60 0.00 07/31/2013 Iteimb Uniforms - Jiro Sachs 81.60 81.60 256.65 OW 07/31/2013 Office Chairs. Station #2 - Fire Dept No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 10 invoice # lnv Date Amon! Quantity Prnt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine 07102013 Total: 256.65 07112013 07/11/2013 478.80 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Mahn Bldg (17112(113 Total: 478.80 SAMSCLUB Total: 735.45 SCHAV,AA.13 Schwaah. Inc. DI6154 07/31/2013 39.74 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies D16154 Total: 39.74 SCHWAAB Total: 39.74 SELECTAC' SelectAccount 946161 07/07/2013 5,49 101-410-1520-43150 Contract Services 946161 Total: 5.49 sa,ccrAc Total: 5.49 SMITHSCH Smith Schafer & Associates.I.TD 10001 07/22/2013 7.850,00 101-410-1520-43010 Audit Services 10001 07/22/2013 5,000.00 101-410-1520-43150 Contract Services 10001 Total: 12.850,00 SMITI-ISCH Total: 12,850.00 STIFTMED Stillwater Medical Group 148528 07/09/2013 549.77 101-420-2220-43050 Physicals 148528 Total: 549,77 STILUMED Total: 549.77 Ti SCH T.A. Schifsky & Sons Inc 55075 07/09/2013 568.52 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 55075 Total: 568.52 55127 07/16/2013 1,276,47 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 55127 Total: 1,276.47 AP - To Be Paid Proof 1.ist 08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) 0.00 07/31/2013 A/C Unit Station 41 - Fire Dept 0.00 07/31/2013 1 Self-luking Notary Stamp 0,00 07/31/2013 Participant Fee 07/1/2013 - 07/31/2013 - 0.00 0.00 07/31/2013 Final Audit City's Financials YrEnd 2012 07/31/2(113 Prep & Review City Financial YrEnd 2012 0.00 07/31/2013 Aimual Physicals Mating 6- Goodsp- Witter 0.00 07/31/2013 Asphalt - June 10, 11 & 13th 2013 0.00 07/31/2013 Asphalt - June 18 thru June 20 2013 No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 00(1(1 Page 11 Invoice # Inv Date TASCI1 Total: TKDA TKDA, Inc. 002013001786 07/08/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002013001786 Total: 002013001787 07/08/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 002013001787 07/08/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 002013001787 Total: IKDA Total: VALLEYTR Valley Trophy Inc. 44395 07/09/2013 204-450-5200-44300 Miscellaneous 44395 Total: VALLEYTR VANGADOR Vang Adora Cable Operator (17/22/2(113 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations Cable Operator Total: VANG.ADOR 'fol al: WAS-SHER Washington County 76216 07/16/2013 101-420-2100-43150 Law Enforcement Contract 76216 Total: WAS-SHER Total: YALI/MEC'H Yak. Mechanical 137940 07/17/2013 101-430-3100-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 137940 Total: 137942 07/17/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/ivlain' Bldg 137942 Total: 137943-138001 07/17/2013 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg 137943-138001 Total; AP - to Be Paid Proof List (.08/01/13 - 11;08 AM) Antount Quantity Putt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # I.844.99 12,370.06 12,370.06 1,589.43 1,199.05 2,788.48 15,158.54 8.55 8.55 8.55 55.00 55.00 55.00 245,089,04 245.089.04 245,089,04 573.89 57.3.89 190.50 190.50 588.47 588.47 0.00 07/31/2013 LE Ave Sewer Infra Plans & Specif 06.29. 0.00 07/31/2013 Keats MSA Street period ending 06.29.13 0.00 07/31/2013 Keats Trunk Watennain period ending 06.2 0.00 07/31/2013 Engraving 2 Plates Trophy Lake Elmo Day 0.00 07/31/2013 Cable Op ations-7/22/13 Plann Comm 4hr 0.00 07/31/2(313 January - June 2013 Police Services 0.00 07/31/2013 Spring Contract Maint Service -Public Wks 0.00 07/31/2013 Spring Contract N1aittt Service -Fire Sta//1 0.00 07/31/2013 Spring ContrMaint Ser-City Hall & Annex No No No No No No No . No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 12 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 141418 07/17/2013 101-410-1940-44010 Repair.s/Main1 Contractual Bldg 141418 'Iota!: YALENIECH "fotal: Report Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 11:08 AM) ?.1.5 542,25 1,895.11 357,93 L76 0.00 07/31/2013 Repairs Leaks Air Colid-City No 0000 Page 13 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: denisc Printed: 08/01/2013 - 12:14 PM Batch: 001-08-2013 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # -y y ALEPOOLS All Poolside Services, Inc 07312013 07/31/2013 500.00 0.00 08/06/2013 Refund Escrow 10325 Tapestry Rd No 0000 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07312013 Total: 500.00 ALI TOOLS Total: 500.00 DELTA Delta Dental Of Minnesota 51993641 07/150013 1.365.90 0.00 08/06/2013 August 2013 Dental Coverage No 0000 101-000-0000-21706 Medical Insurance 51993641 Total: 1.365.90 DEL TA Total: 1,365.90 FA IRMA RK Fair Market Elonies 073 12013 07/31/2013 3,000.00 0.00 08/06/2013 Refund Escrow 10011 Tapestry Rd No 0000 803-000-0000-22900 Deposits Payable 07312013 Total: 3.000.00 EAIKMARK Total: 3,000.00 FINANCE Finance and Commerce 741053187 07/30/2013 101-410-1450-43510 Public Notices 741053187 Total: E[NANCE Total: FXL FXL, Inc. August-13 07/25/2013 101-410-1320-43100 Assessing Services August-13 Total: FXL Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/13 - 12;14 PM) 231.08 0.00 08/06/2013 Advertisement for Water/Sewer Bid No 0000 231.08 231.08 2,000.00 0.00 08/06/2013 Assessment Services - August 2013 2,000.00 2,000.00 No 0000 Page 1 Invoiee # Inv Date NCPERS 566200-NCPERS Minnesota 5662813 07/15/2013 101-000-0000-21708 Other Benefits 5662813 'Fowl: NCPERS Iota!: SAWYERCH Sawyer Cheryl August 14 2013 08/1,1/2013 206-450-5300-43150 Contract Services August 14 2013 Total: SAWN:I:141 1 Total: SW/WC SW/WC Service Cooperatives 07292013 07/29/2013 10 I -000-0000-2 I 706 Medical Insurance 0729201.3 Total: SW/WC 'Fotal: Report Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List (08/01/I3 - 12:14 PM) Amount Quantity Putt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 176,00 0.00 08/06/2013 August 2013 Deductions 176.00 176.00 200.00 0.00 08/06/2013 Speaker for Library -Storyteller 8/14/13 - 200.00 200.00 2 1,168.00 0.00 08/06/2013 September 2013 Insurance Premiums 21,168.00 21,168.00 28,640.98 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 2 THE. CITY LAKE FLMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Reschedule November 5, 2013 Council Adam Bell, City Clerk Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION Meeting 08/06/2012 5 Consent Agenda SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from Consent; Introduction of Item City Administrator Report/Presentation Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION 'REQUESTED: As part of the Consent Agenda, the City Council is respectfully requested to officially reschedule the November 5, 2013 City Council meeting in order to comply with state law. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this rescheduling, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the rescheduling by taking the following action or amending as necessary: "Move to amend the 2013 Lake Elmo City Council Meeting Calendar by rescheduling the November 5 meeting to November 6, 2013." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per MN State Statutes, a city is not allowed to conduct a public meeting between the hours of 6:00 PM and 8:00 PM on the day of an election. A special election has been called for ISD 834 (Stillwater), which includes Lake Elmo, and will take place on November 5, 2013. November 5 is also the date of a previously scheduled Lake Elmo City Council Meeting. In order to comply with Minn. Stat. § 204C.03, the City Council must either change the time of its meeting or change the date. Changing the meeting time is not a practical solution at this time. As with previous date conflicts, the Council has historically rescheduled the date of the meeting. Staff initially solicited input from the Council as to what dates would be the best option for rescheduling. At the July 16, 2013 meeting it was recommended that the 11/5/13 meeting be rescheduled to 11/06/13. Staff recommends that the November 5 meeting be rescheduled to Wednesday. November 6 at 7:00 PM. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends the City Council officially reschedule the November 5, 2013 City Council meeting as proposed. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this rescheduling, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the rescheduling by taking the following action or amending as necessary: "Move to amend the 2013 Lake Elm© City Council Meeting Calendar by rescheduling the November 5 meeting to November 6, 2013." ATTACHMENTS: None AUTHORITY: 2012 Minnesota Statutes: § 204C.03 PUBLIC MEETINGS PROHIBITED ON ELECTION DAY. Subdivision 1.School districts; counties; municipalities; special taxing districts. No special taxing district governing body, school hoard, county board of commissioners, city council, or town board of supervisors shall conduct a meeting between 6:00 pm. and 8:00 p.m. on the day that an election is held within the boundaries of the special taxing iilistrict, school district, county, city, or town. As used in this subdivision, "special taxing district" has the meaning given in section 275.066. CT' OF LAKE ELMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: 8/06/2013 6 Authorization for John Schiltz to dispense beer and wine coolers at the Lake Elmo Days event on September 6 and 7, 2013. Alyssa MacLeod, Taxpayer Relations & Communications Coordinator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item Staff Report/Presentation Staff Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of the Consent Agenda, the City Council is requested to consider authorization for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on -sale liquor license holder to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event on September 6 & 7, 2013. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this authorization, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize John Schatz, owner and operator of Lake Elm© lnn, a municipal retail on -sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers of f premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event being held September 6 and 7, 2013." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Pursuant to MN State Statute 340A.404 Subd. 4(b), under Special provisions; sports, conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals, the governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 340A.409 to cover the event. The City of Lake Elmo, in conjunction with local businesses and the corrununity, will hold the Lake Elmo Days event on September 6 and 7, 2013. Authorization is necessary for the safe sale of alcohol at the event and to confirm the requirement of liability insurance for the municipal on -sale license holder. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There is no financial cost to the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council authorize as part of the Consent Agenda for John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elmo Inn, a municipal retail on -sale liquor license holder to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event being held September 6 and 7, 2013. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this authorization, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the authorization by taking the following action: "Move to authorize John Schiltz, owner and operator of Lake Elnto Inn, a municipal retail on -sale liquor license holder, to dispense beer and wine coolers off premises and allow for consumption within the parameters set for the City's Lake Elmo Days event being held September 6 and 7, 2013." AUTHORITY: 2012 Minnesota Statutes: § 340A.404 INTOXICATING LIQUOR; ON -SALE LICENSES. Subd. 4.Special provisions; sports, conventions, or cultural facilities; community festivals. (b) The governing body of a municipality may authorize a holder of a retail on -sale intoxicating liquor license issued by the municipality to dispense intoxicating liquor off premises at a community festival held within the municipality. The authorization shall specify the area in which the intoxicating liquor must be dispensed and consumed, and shall not be issued unless the licensee demonstrates that it has liability insurance as prescribed by section 340A.409 to cover the event. 2 THE CITY OF LA K E F L M 0 ma. AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Library Board Appointment Mayor Mike Pearson Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: 8/06/2013 7 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from Consent).. Introduction of Item City Administrator Report/Presentation Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Brett Emmons to the Lake Elmo Library Board as an alternate member for a two-year term." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Per MN State Statutes, the mayor of a municipality has the authority and responsibility to appoint members of the local library board. The appointment must be affirmed by the members of the City Council. In 201 1, the Mayor appointed five regular members and three alternates to the newly created Lake Elmo Library Board. Board members are appointed to staggered I -Year, 2-Year, and 3-Year terms. Due to attrition, there is currently one alternate board position that needs to be filled. RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends that the City of Lake Elmo City Council as part of the Consent Agenda affuni the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Library Board by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Brett Emmons to the Lake Elmo Library Board as an alternate member for a two-year term." THE CITY OF ELMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION EDA Appointment Mayor Mike Pearson Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: 8/06/2013 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from consent): Introduction of Item City Administrator Report/Presentation Mayor Pearson Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Economic Development Authority. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Council Member Nelson to the Lake Elmo Economic Development Author ,." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: In 2013, The City Council authorized the creation of a local Economic Development Authority (EDA). Per MN State Statutes, the mayor of a municipality has the authority and responsibility to appoint members of the local EDA. The appointment must be affirmed by the members of the City Council. In 2013, the Mayor appointed five regular members and one alternate to the newly created Lake Elmo EDA. In addition, two members of the Council are required to be appointed to the EDA. Mayor Pearson appointed himself and Council Member Park to the authority. Due to Council Member Park's resignation effective July 16, 2013, there is currently a vacancy on the EDA that needs to be filled by a Council Member. FINANCIAL IMPACT: None RECOMMENDATION: The Mayor recommends that the City of Lake Elmo City Council is respectfully requested as part of the Consent Agenda to affirm the following appointment to the City of Lake Elmo Economic Development Authority. As part of the Consent Agenda, no formal motion is required. If the Council wishes to further discuss this appointment, they can remove this item from the Consent Agenda and approve the appointment by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Council Member Nelson to the Lake Elmo Economic Development Authority." AUTHORITY: 2012 Minnesota Statutes: § 469.095 COMMISSIONERS; APPOINTMENT, TERMS, VACANCIES, PAY, REMOVAL. Subdivision. 2.Appointment, terms; vacancies (EXCERPTED). (c) Seven -member authority: the commissioners constituting a seven -member authority, two of whom must be members of the city council, shall be appointed by the mayor with the approval of the city council. Those initially appointed shall he appointed for terms of one, two, three, four, and five years respectively and two members for six years. Thereafter all commissioners shall be appointed for six -year terms. (f) A vacancy is created in the membership of an authority when a city council member of the authority ends council membership. A vacancy for this or another reason must be filled for the balance of the unexpired tent', in the manner in which the original appointment was made. The city council may set the term of the commissioners who are members of the city council to coincide with their term of office as members of the city council. 2 THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/6/13 REGULAR ITEM #: 9 RESOLUTION 2013-064 Savona Residential Subdivision (Lennar) Preliminary Plat Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Jack Griffin, City Engineer Planning Commission SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ................... ........ ....... ..... ....... ..... ......... ..... .„Staff Report/Presentation Staff Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT The Planning Commission has previously reviewed a sketch plan for the Savona Subdivision. The Subdivision Ordinance requires that the City Council review and approval a preliminary plat before an applicant may proceed with the preparation and recording of a final plat. FISCAL IMPACT: TBD — The City will require that the applicant enter into a developer's agreement with the City to specify the financial responsibilities for various aspects of the subdivision and related public improvements. SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to consider a preliminary plat request from Lennar Corporation for a 310 unit residential development to be located on 112.6 acres west of Keats Avenue and within the City's 1-94 corridor planning area, The proposed plat would be located on property owned by two different entities, including Dale Properties and the Frandsen Bank and Trust, and would be situated immediately east of Keats Avenue and approximately 1/4 mile north of 1-94. The preliminary plat has been prepared in response to the City's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan for the corridor, which guides this area for low and medium density urban residential development. Staff and the Planning Commission are recommending that the City Council approve the preliminary plal with 2S conditions of approval as listed in the attached resolution and by taking the following action / with the following motion: "Nlotion to adopt Resolution No. 2013-064 approving the Savona preliminary plat with 28 conditions of approval" BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Attached is the original detailed Staff report that was provided to the Planning Commission regarding the applicant's request for a preliminary plat, which includes general information about the application, details concerning the request, a summary of the relevant planning and zoning issues, a thorough review and analysis of the preliminay plat (including a draft list of recommended conditions of approval), draft findings, and the Staff recommendation to the Planning Commission. Because the Planning Conunission tabled taking action on the preliminary plat during its initial review meeting. Staff also prepared the attached "response matrix" document that was drafted to address specific questions and comments that were raised during the course of the public hearing, PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission reviewed the preliminary plat application at its July 22, 2013 meeting and conducted a public hearing on the request at this time. The Commission closed the public hearing, but elected to table taking action on the application until its July 29th meeting with a request that a representative of the Parks Commission attend this meeting to discuss parkland issues. Because the Commission received comments from several individuals during the hearing, and also heard testimony from the Park Commission chair and additional individuals at the July 29th meeting, Staff has attached a copy of the Commission's approved June 22nd meeting minutes along with a copy of the draft minutes from the June 29th meeting. These minutes also include a detailed description of the Planning Commission's discussion and action on the preliminary plat. During the course of the public hearing and subsequent meeting discussion, the primary issue that was debated focused on the amount of park land that the applicant was proposing to dedicate as part of the subdivision. The Park Commission chair did address the Planning Commission on this matter and noted that the amount of land being dedicated by the developer was deemed adequate by the Park Commission. The applicant also presented two rough concepts depicting how the park area could be used to accommodate various activities on the site (these drawings are attached for consideration by the Council). Additionally, the Planning Commission raised several questions about the density of the development, and in particular, why the City was using a range to determine the densities allowed in areas guided for low density urban residential. The "Staff Response Matrix" provides Staff s response to these questions, which includes the conclusion that the proposed subdivision is consistent with the densities included in the Comprehensive Plan for the site. The Planning Commission also received a request from Charlie Devine, speaking on behalf of the potential developer of land to the west of the Savona subdivision and representing the property ownersof this land, that the 5th Street minor collector road be realigned to enter their property further to the south. He asked that the Commission include a condition of approval that would require the applicant to resolve the road alignment to the satisfaction of both parties prior to proceeding with a final plat for the subdivision. Staff did not recommend that such a condition be added as part of the Planning Commission recommending, and noted that road as depicted in the preliminary plat is consistent with the general alignment identified in the Comprehensive Plan. Staff did make modifications to the recommended list of conditions that would allow the realignment to occur prior to submission of a final plat (but would not otherwise mandate the road being moved to a new location). The Commission did modify some of the conditions of approval as originally recommended by Staff, and the final list of conditions as further refined the Planning Commission are included in Resolution No. 2013-064. The Conunission recommended approval of the preliminary plat as submitted with 28 conditions of approval. Of the five commissioners present, three supported to motion to recommend approval of the plat while two commissioners voted against this motion. The members that did not support the recommendation indicated that they wanted to see additional land dedicated for public park purposes on the plat. PLANNING COMMISSION RECCOMENDATION: Based upon the above background information, Staff report and Planning Commission recommendation, it is recommended that the City Council approve the Savona preliminary plat with the 28 conditions of approval as documented in the resolution of approval by taking the following action / with the following motion: "Motion to adopt Resolution No. 2013-064 approving the Savona preliminary plat with 28 conditions of approval" ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 2013-064 2. Detailed Staff Report to Planning Commission (7/22/13) 3. Staff Response to Meeting Comments 4. Preliminary Landscape Plan Review Comments 5. Application Form (3) 6. Property Owner Contact Information 7. Woodland Evaluation Report 8. Review Comments: a. City Engineer b. Washington County c. Building Official d. Valley Branch Watershed District 9. 5th Street Concept Plans (Damon Farber Associates) 10. Planning Commission Minutes: a. July 22, 2013 b. July 29, 2013 11. Written Comments: a. Statement from Dale Properties b. Todd Williams c. Rolf Larson 12. Concept Sketches for Park Area 13. Updated Preliminary Site Plan 14. Preliminary Plat and Plans (23 sheets) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-064 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A PRELIMINARY PLAT FOR SA VONA WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo is a municipal corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Minnesota; and WHEREAS, U.S. Home Corporation (d/b/a Lennar), 16305 361h Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth, MN acting on behalf of Dale Properties, LLC and Frandsen Bank and Trust (Applicant) has submitted an application to the City of Lake Elmo (City) for a Preliminary Plat for Savona, a copy of which is on file in the City of Lake Elmo Planning and Zoning Department; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission held public hearing on July 22, 2013 to consider the Preliminary Plat request and continued discussion on the Preliminary Plat at its July 29, 2013 meeting ; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission has submitted its report and recommendation concerning the Preliminary Plat as part of a memorandum to the City Council from Director of Planning Kyle Klatt for the August 6, 2013 Council Meeting; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo Planning Commission adopted a motion recommending approval of the Preliminary Plat; and WHEREAS, the City Council reviewed the Preliminary Plat at its meeting held on August 6, 2013 and made the following findings of fact: 1) That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. ) That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential and Urban Medium Density Residential zoning district standards. That the Savona preliminary plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water, sediment and erosion control and other ordinances. 4) That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. 5) That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the City's engineering standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated July 9, 2013. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council does hereby approve the preliminary plat for Savona subject to the following conditions: 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall complete the following: a) the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney; b) the applicant shall pay al] fees associated with the preliminary plat; c) the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the "Exception" parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight -foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room for drainage and utilities adjacent to "Street A". 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green belt/buffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. 4) The eight -foot bituminous trail located within Outlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to "Street A". 5) The trail within the green belt/buffer area must be located within the southern one-third or eastern one-third of the buffer and as close as possible to the lots within the Savona subdivision. 6) The sidewalk along "Street A" must continue along this street til its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. 7) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Keats Avenue. 8) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. 9) The landscape plan shall be reviewed and approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of a final plat and final construction plans. 10) Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi -family housing portion of the subdivision. 11 ) The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3, 2013. The required improvements shall include, but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten -foot bituminous trail through the median, turn lanes, and other improvements as required by the County. 12) The applicant shall observe all other County requirements as specified in the Washington County review letter dated July 3, 2013. 13) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 14) The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically, the rearrangement of lots around the "Exception" parcel. 15) The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. 16) The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 17) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision, 18) The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area (either public or private) within the multi -family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 19) No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat (155) may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south, Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) to the west, or back to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) through the property to the north of Savona. 20) A future realignment of 5 Street along the western border of the plat may be considered by the City Council as part of the final plat submission for this are provided the realignment does not result in any significant modifications to the preliminary plat. 21) The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval. The City Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat. and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 2) The preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. 23) The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate all proposed improvements within the 5th Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Damon Farber and Associates. 24) All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9, 2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to. the following: a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas line, if necessary. b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water ponding. 25) The City will not accept an application for final plat approval until the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 has been ordered by the City Council. If the City Council does not order this project, the applicant -must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 26) The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi -family area, including but not limited to a eonditional use permit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street, at the time a final plat is submitted for this area. 27) The applicant is encouraged to preserve or re -use as many trees as possible that are currently located on the former golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. 28) The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. Passed and duly adopted this 61) day of August 2013 by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk II CITY or NKE ELMO ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: PLANNING COMMISSION DATE: 7/22/13 AGENDA ITEM: 4A — PUBLIC HEARING CASE # 2013-22 Savona Residential Subdivision — Preliminary Plat Kyle Klatt, Planning Director Nick Johnson, City Planner JackGriffin, City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Planning Commission is being asked to consider a Preliminary Plat request from Lennar Corporation for a 310 unit residential development to be located on 112.6 acres west of Keats Avenue and within the City's 1-94 corridor planning area. Staff is recommending approval of the request subject to compliance with a series of conditions as noted in this report. GENERAL INFORMATION Applicant: Property Owners: Location: Request: U.S. Home Corporation, D/B/A Lennar, 16305 36th Avenue North, Suite 600, Plymouth, MN Dale Properties, LLC and Frandsen Bank and Trust Part of Section 34 in Lake Elmo, north of 1-94, west of Keats Avenue, and south of Goose Lake. PID Numbers 34.029.21.34.0003; 34.029.21.34.0001; 34,029.21.31,0001; 34.029.21.42.0001; 34.023.21.41.0004 Application for preliminary plat approval of a 310 unit residential subdivision to be named Savona. Existing Land Use and Zoning: Agricultural land, closed and abandoned golf driving range and practice facil.ity. Cun-ent Zoning: RT — Rural Transitional Zoning District; Proposed Zoning: LDR and MDR Surrounding Land Use and Zoning: North — active minim and gravel operation; west, south and east — agricultural land Comprehensive Plan: Urban Low Density Residential (2.5 — 4 units per acre) and Urban Medium Density Residential (4.5 — 7 units per acre) History: Sketch Plan review by Planning Commission on 12/10/12. EAW approved by the City Council on 7/2/13. Deadline ,Rtr Action: Application Complete — 7/14/13 60 Day Deadline 8/13113 Extension Letter Mailed — No 120 Day Deadline — 10/12/13 PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM Applicable Regulations: Chapter 153 — Subdivision Regulations Article 10 — Urban Residential Districts (LDR) §150.270 Storm Water, Erosion, and Sediment REQUEST DETAILS The City of Lake Elmo has received a request from Lennar Corporation for a preliminary plat to subdivide approximately 113 acres of land located within the 1-94 Corridor planning area into 310 single family and multi -family housing sites. The proposed plat would be located on property currently owned by two different entities, including Dale Properties and the Frandsen Bank and Trust, and would be located immediately west of Keats Avenue roughly 1/4 of a mile north of the 1- 94 right-of-way. The 40-acre parcel currently owned by the Frandsen Bank that is included in the preliminary plat was formerly used as a golf driving range and practice facility. This facility ceased operation over five years ago and has sat vacant ever since. The remainder of the area to be platted is currently owned by Dale Properties and is currently used for agricultural purposes. The preliminary plat has been developed in response to the City's recently adopted Comprehensive Plan, which identifies the bulk of the applicant's property for urban low density residential development with a small portion that is guided for medium density residential development. The plat incorporates 188 single family lots, most of which are designed with a width of 65 or 75 feet, and 122 single family attached residential units that would be constructed in buildings with four to eight connected units. The multi -family area is located adjacent to Keats Avenue and would be located on the southern half of the Frandsen site while the single family lots would extend throughout the rest of the platted area. The preliminary plat also includes a major portion of the proposed 5th Street Minor Collector road as planned in the City's Transportation Plan. This minor collector road will serve as the primary access for the Savona Subdivision, and will also act as the dividing point between the planned low density residential and the medium density residential/commercial areas along the corridor. The plat incorporates all of 5th Street adjacent to the Savona subdivision, which represents the first segment of a major roadway that is planned to eventually connect Manning Avenue (CSAH 15) to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). Consistent with the City's specifications for this roadway segment. the applicant has provided for a 120-foot wide right-of-way, which will provide sufficient room for the construction of a parkway with turning lanes, 10-foot bituminous trail, sidewalk, trees, lighting, and other design elements as planned by the City. This subdivision is the City's first subdivision that will receive public sanitary sewer service. and because it is the first subdivision to be platted after adoption of the revised Comprehensive Plan, there are several ongoing planning efforts that are happening concuuent with this request. Most importantly, the applicant and several other property owners within the immediate area have petitioned the City to extend sewer and water services to the area. The planned improvements include a new sewer lift station to be sited on the property north of the proposed plat, the construction of a sewer main that will connect to the regional sewer interceptor within the Eagle Point Business Park, and the extension of water lines that will provide a connection to the City's water system. At present, the City's water for this area is provided by the City of Oakdale; however, Lake Elmo's long-range water plans call for an eventual connection to the City's water system via a new line along Inwood Avenue. There is enough capacity in the Oakdale system to provide water to the Lennar development, and a significant portion of the area around the proposed plat, until Lake Elmo can make the needed connections to its system. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM One of the other major features of the proposed subdivision is a series of outlots that will provide for open space, trails, and storm water management throughout the development area. Based on an initial review of the proposed park system with the Lake Elmo Park Commission, the applicant is proposing one smaller neighborhood park near the center of the development with a series of trails providing connections in all directions outside of the platted area. The development also incorporates a buffer/greenway area along the northern boundary of the plat adjacent to an existing RE — Residential Estates subdivision as required in the City's Comprehensive Plan. All outlots that are planned for park land or storm water use will be deeded to the City, while the future home owner's association will retain ownership of the remaining outlots. Please note that since the application for a preliminary plat was deemed complete by the City, the applicant has submitted a reviewed preliminary plat document in order to respond to review comments from the City related to the extreme western portion of the site. In particular, the plat as submitted did not properly provide for future trail connections around an exception parcel and the proposed road connections to the west did not line up with current concept plans for the adjacent property. Because the revised plat was submitted recently, the applicant has not gone back an updated the coiresponding construction documents accordingly. Because the affected area is relatively small and does not result in any significant deviations from the construction plans, Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission proceed with its review with the understanding that the construction plans will need to be updated in advance of any further City reviews. The number of proposed residential units did trigger a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) under State law, and the City has recently approved this study. The end result of the EAW was that there are no major environmental impacts that are anticipated with the proposed development. The City did receive several comments regarding the proposed development from the reviewing agencies and will continue to review these comments as the development progresses towards final plat approval. The applicant is proposing to bring forward a final plat for the Savona development in stages, starting with the single family portion of the site adjacent to Keats Avenue and then working westward on the site. At this time, the applicant anticipates that the multi -family area will be the last portion of the site to be constructed. In addition, the applicant has requested a rezoning of the site in order to remove the current transitional zoning that is in place and to zone the site in a manner consistent with the City's Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending that the zoning action be delayed by the City until after the preliminary plat approval (and either before or in conjunction with any final platting of the subdivision) since the boundary between the LDR and MDR areas will not be defined until 5'1' Street is platted. PLANNING AND ZONING ISSUES The Savona site is guided for urban low density and urban medium density development in the City's Comprehensive Plan, and the applicant has proposed to zone the corresponding portions of the site LDR. — Low Density Residential and MRD — Medium Density Residential respectively. The plans labeled as "site context'. in the included packet of information depict the exact areas that will be zoned in this manner. The overall subdivision plan has therefore been prepared in order to comply with the district standards for the LDR and MDR districts in terms of lot size, lot widths, building setbacks, and other design criteria. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM 4 The arrangement of lots and blocks follows a very loose grid pattern as one moves from east to west through the subdivision, but with a considerable amount of curving throughout the road network. A significant feature of the subdivision is a north/south trail connection that follows an old fence row dividing the site, with the streets and lots in this portion of the site looping around the trail. This allows for the placement of a smaller park area in the middle of plat that is able to take advantage of one of the few areas on the site with any significant trees. The subdivision has also been designed in a manner to provide for future connections to the properties to the north and to the west either through local streets or trough access to the 5th Street Minor Collector road. All streets have been designed to comply with the City's current street standards, which exceed the minimum levels required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Sidewalks and trails are planned throughout the subdivision, and Staff is recommending that sidewalks be installed on at least one side of all streets in the single family portion of the plat. The proposed plans provide for sidewalks consistent with the Staff recorrunendation. Within the multi- family area Staff has asked that the developer provide sidewalk on both sides of the street, in which case the plans need to be updated in order to comply with this expectation. In addition to the internal trails and sidewalks that are proposed by the developer, the City has asked that the 5' Street Corridor include a 10-foot bituminous trail on one side of the road and a six-foot sidewalk on the opposite side. The proposed plans conform to this request as well. A typical lot building plan (detail) is included as part of the attached subdivision packet, and each lot as depicted in the plans includes a description of the lot size. dimensions, and all required setbacks. There are two general lot sizes proposed for the single family area with average dimensions of 65 by 140 feet and 75 by 140 feet. All of the lots meet the City's minimum area requirement of 8,000 for single family lots in a LDR district, with the smallest lot proposed at 8,451 square feet. The site plans further illustrate that throughout the single family area the lots will average 11, 175 square feet, which exceeds the minimum requirements by a fairly wide margin. There is not as much detail provided for the multi -family area, which will be subject to additional reviews in order be developed as planned. In particular, the City's MDR zoning district standards specify that certain situations require a conditional use permit, including the construction of single family attached dwellings without frontage on a public street. Because the applicant is proposing to utilize private streets to serve the proposed multi -family buildings, a conditional use permit will need to be submitted along with the final plat request for this portion of the site. There are other standards associated with the MDR zoning district that will require the submission of more detailed plans for the buildings that are proposed in the multi -family portion of the plat. The following is a general summary of the subdivision design elements that have proposed as part of the Savona preliminary plat and plans: Zoning and Site Information: • Existing Zoning: • Proposed Zoning: • Total Site Area: • Total Residential Units: • Proposed Density (Net): REC Units from Comp Plan: RT — Rural Transitional LDR (92 acres) and MDR (21 acres) 113 acres (not including Outlot M) 3]0 3 units per acre — Single Family area 6.7 units per acre — Multi -Family area 286 (covers less area than proposed plat) PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM 5 Proposed Lot Dimensional Standards: • Min. Lot Width: • Lot Depth: • Lot Area: • Front Yard Setback: • Side Yard Setback: • Rear Yard Setback: Proposed Street Standards: • ROW Width Local • ROW Width — Minor Collector • Street Widths — Local: • Street Width — Minor Collector 65 ft. 128 ft. (140 ft. typical) 8,000 sq. ft. (8,451 min.) 25 ft. 7,5 ft. (average) 20 ft. 60 ft. (per Subdivision Ordinance) 120 feet 28 ft.(per City standard) Varies — parkway design proposed The standards listed above are all in compliance with the applicable requirements from the City's zoning and subdivision regulations. Based on Staff s review of the preliminary plat, the applicant has demonstrated compliance with all applicable code requirements at the level of detail that is required for a preliminary plat. As with any new subdivision the City Code requires that a portion of the plat be set aside for public park use. In this case, the applicant has indicated that certain outlot areas will be dedicated to the City for this purpose, including Outlots A and F and a portion of Outlot E. Since a large portion these areas represent green belt or trail corridors and are not suitable for other types of active recreation usage, it is Staffs recommendation that the City only accept the trail corridors as part of the park land dedication requirements if the developer constructs the planned trail over these areas in conjunction with other required infrastructure improvements. As a general policy, Staff is recommending that the City consider accepting smaller land dedications in exchange for a more robust and connected trail system that will provide access to the City's numerous parks (including the regional park preserve). The Subdivision Ordinance requires 10% of the land in urban residential districts to be set aside as open space, which totals 11.3 acres. The areas to be dedicated for public use add up to 6,4 acres, which leaves the applicant 4.9 acres short of the required land dedication. lf the City chooses to accept smaller amount of land dedication. the developer will be required to pay a fee equivalent to the fair market value of this 4.9 acres. This payment would be places in the City's park land fund, and could be used to acquire new park land or trail corridors or for the improvement of existing park areas. REVIEW AND ANALYSIS City Staff has reviewed the proposed preliminary plat, which has gone through several versions in advance of the formal application being accepted as complete by the City. During the course of these reviews, several of the issues and concerns that were pointed out by Staff have been addressed by the applicant with updated submission documents; however, there are other elements of the plat that must still be addressed or corrected by the applicant. In general, the proposed plat will meet all applicable City requirements for approval, and any deficiencies or additional work that is needed is noted as part of the review record. As the initial subdivision to he developed within one of the City's PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a ACTION ITEM 6 urban service areas, there are several things happening in and around the Savona subdivision that will have an impact on the project, including the larger assessment project that will bring water and sewer services into this area, the ongoing work to plan for a significant minor collector road to meet the transportation needs of this area, and the plans from adjacent property owners to develop their properties, Given the location of the subdivision in an area that will be seeing significant changes in the near future, Staff recognizes that this initial plat will have a number of issues that will need to be resolved in the future. The City has received a detailed list of comments from the City Engineer and the Washington County concerning the proposed subdivision, in addition to general comments from the Valley Branch Watershed District, Building Official, and the Fire Chief, all of which are attached for consideration by the Commission. In addition to the general comments that have been provided in the preceding sections of this report, Staff would like the Planning Commission to consider the issues and comments related to the following discussion areas as well; Comprehensive Plan. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan for this area and with the densities that were approved as part of this plan. The net densities for the development fall within the ranges allowed for the urban low density and urban medium density land use categories. Furthermore, the overall number of REC units planned matches the overall numbers that were used for projecting the unit counts in this area. Other aspects of the Comprehensive Plan relate to the Savona subdivision as follows: o Transportation. The City's transportation plan calls for the construction of a minor collector road that will connect the eastern and western portions of the 1-94 Con-idor. Staff views this road as a critical piece of the transportation infrastructure that is needed to serve the densities that have been planned for this area. Lennar has incorporated the right-of-way at the width necessary to construct the minor collector as part of its preliminary plat. o Parks. The City's park plan identifies proposed locations for neighborhood parks based on the anticipated population that should be served by each park. In addition to the existing Stonegate Park, the plan calls for at least two additional parks in the vicinity of the Savona Plat, one in the middle of the proposed development area and one off the applicant's site closer to Goose Lake. As noted earlier by Staff, the Park Commission did review the Savona sketch plan and generally agreed with concept of having a smaller "pocket/neighborhood" park serve the subdivision along with a series of trails providing connections to the Stonegate Park and other local and regional parks and trails. o Water. Water will eventually be provided to this area via a future extension of the system along Inwood Avenue. The Savona subdivision will be able to be served under the City's current agreement with the City of Oakdale until the Inwood extension is completed. o Sanitary Sewer. Lennar will be required to connect to the sewer main being constructed as part of the Section 34 area wide assessment project. In this case, all of the property owners that are planned to be served by sanitary sewer have petitioned PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM 7 the City to construct the required sewer and water mains to serve the area. The utility plans for Savona are consistent with the proposed assessment project. o Phasing. The Savona subdivision is located within the Stage 1 phasing area for the I- 94 Corridor and therefore the proposed development is acceptable as the first development within the planned urban residential areas. Zoning. The proposed zoning for the Savona site will be split between the LDR — Low Density Residential and the MDR — Medium Density Residential zoning districts. The submitted development plans demonstrate compliance with the City's urban residential zoning requirements; however, additional details will need to be provided for the multi- family area in order to fully review the plans for this area. Single family detached housing is a permitted use under the code, while certain aspects of the multi -family project may require a. conditional use permit (CUP). If a CUP is required for the multi -family portion of the project, this request may be submitted in conjunction with a final plat for this part of the site. The applicant has indicated that the multi -family development will comply with the City's requirements for open space for such developments. Subdivision Requirements. The City's Subdivision Ordinance includes a fairly lengthy list of standards that must be met by all new subdivisions, and include requirements for blocks, lots, easements, erosion and sediment control, drainage systems, monuments, sanitary sewer and water facilities, streets, and other aspects of the plans. For instance, the Ordinance includes limitations on the maximum length of a block (1,800 feet), and based on the spacing of the proposed streets, the Savona plat complies with this requirement. The majority of these requirements have been addressed as part of the City Engineer's comments (which are summarized below) or have been reviewed as part of Staff s ongoing rnmunications with the applicant regarding the project. Infrastructure. The developer will be required to construct all streets, sewer, water, storm water ponds, and other infrastructure necessary to serve the development. Because the Savona subdivision is not adjacent to any existing utilities, the developer has joined a petition with other property owners in the area to have the City undertake a project to build the required water and sewer mains (and required sewer lift station) and then assess the cost of this work back to the benefiting property owners. Because the installation of the infrastructure covered under the assessment project is critical to providing services to Savona, Staff has included a condition on the approval of the preliminary plat what requires this project to be ordered before the applicant may proceed with a final plat. Landscaping. The Planning Department has completed a detailed review of the City's landscaping requirements for the project, and due to the length of these particular comments, has attached this review as a separate document. In general, the landscape plans does meet the City's requirements; however. Staff is recommending that this plan be reviewed by a landscape architect prior to approval of the final plat. Tree Preservation and Protection. The City recently adopted a tree preservation and protection ordinance; however, this ordinance was not effective at the time the applicant submitted its plat. The applicant did prepare a woodland evaluation report (attached) that indicates there are not a large number of significant trees on the site. Most of the remaining PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM trees are located along a fence row that will be preserved as part of a trail corridor through the middle of the project. Other trees are located in very small clusters on the western portion of the property or were planted as part of the golf facility over ten years ago. Staff is recommending that as a condition of approval the applicant be required to install fencing around all trees to be preserved prior to the commencement of any grading activity. Staff is also asking that the applicant move as many of the existing trees on the golf facility site as possible and incorporate these trees into the landscape plans for Savona. Green Belt/Buffer. The Comprehensive Plan identifies an area north of the Savona Plat and south of the Stonegate subdivision as a green belt/buffer space with a minimum width of 100 feet. The Savona subdivision includes an area that has been design to comply with this aspect of the Comprehensive Plan; however, there are two areas where the green belt as shown does not appear to meet the intent of the Comprehensive Plan. First, the green space near Lots 1 and 2 or Block 10 does not follow a consistent 100 feet from the Stonegate neighborhood and must be increased in width in order to comply The trail in this portion of the plat must also be pulled away from adjacent property lines and will need to continue into the property to the north. Secondly, the trail that would allow for public dedication of the green belt does not continue around the exception parcel in the extreme northwest portion of the plat. Staff is recommending that the applicant dedicate a minimum width of 30 feet around the exception parcel in order to provide enough room to construct a trail, and must also include the continuation of this trail as part of the plans for the project. With these revisions to the plat/plans, Staff believes that that green belt/buffer requirements of the Comprehensive Plan would be met by the applicant. Exception Parcel. The depth of exception parcel in the northwest portion of the site is shown on the plat at 250 feet. Staff has received a survey from the applicant for the entire parcel that shows that this measurement should be 262 feet. The applicant will need to update the preliminary plat to reflect the correct measurements for this parcel. Streets and Transportation. The proposed street system has been designed to comply with all applicable subdivision requirements and City engineering standards. As noted in the City Engineer's report, Staff is recommending that "Street A" and "Street E" be re -aligned in manner that provides a more direct connection between 5th Street and the eventual development that will take place to the north of Savona. The City Engineer has also requested that additional right-of-way be secured at the intersection of 5th Street and the future street providing a connection to the property to be retained by Dale Properties to the south. Staff further is requesting that the plans for 5111Street include all design elements as requested by the City, including the street trees, landscaping, lighting, signage, median plantings, and fencing proposed as part of the City's recent theming project with Damon and Farber Associates, A 5th Street concept that has been prepared by the City's consultant has been provided to the applicant and is attached for review by the Planning Commission. o County Comments. Continents from Washington County, which focus on needed improvements to Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to serve the development. are noted below. o Temporary Dead End Roads. Because the time table for construction of road improvements on the property to the north in unknown at this point in time, the PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM applicant will need to plan for temporary turn-arounds on those streets that will eventually connect to the Hammes site. Street Names. Staff is continuing to work on implementing a clear and consistent naming system for new streets in the community and has not yet had time to consider street names within the Savona subdivision. As a condition of approval, Staff is asking that the applicant continue to work with the City at developing street names for the project, and that these names be included with the final plat submission. Adjacent Parcels. The proposed plat provides street and trail connections (with the one exception noted above) to adjacent parcels, and these connection are consistent with the latest plans that Staff has received from the adjoining property owners. Please note that the property owner to the west has requested that 5th Street follow a more southerly alignment in the western portion of the Savona plat. Staff has noted that any re -alignment of this roadway may be considered as an amendment to the plat in the future. At this point in time, Staff is not aware that the property owner (Dale Properties) has consented to a change in this road alignment. City Engineer RaVieW. The City Engineer has provided the Planning Department with a detailed comment letter as a summary of his preliminary plat review. Staff has incorporated the more significant issues identified by the Engineer as part of the recommended conditions of approval, and has also included a general condition that all issues identified by the City Engineer must be addressed by the applicant prior to approval of a final plat for any portion of the Savona subdivision, The Engineer does note that the proposed plat complies with the City' 5 standards with one exception related to sidewalk grades, but does recommend approval of this exception due to difficulties that are primarily related to current site conditions. Fire Department Review. The Fire Chief has reviewed the plat and has requested that any cul-de-sacs (including those with islands) he designed to allow for the efficient turning movement of larger fire vehicles. He has also asked that the spacing of fire hydrants comply with the City's requirements, The City Engineer will be taking these comments into consideration during its review of future construction plans for this subdivision. Washington County Review, County Staff has reviewed the Savona plat and provided specific comments to the City in a letter dated July 3, 2013. The most significant of the County's concerns is that the applicant will need to make improvements to the County road system in order to provide the necessary access to Savona. As a condition of approval. Staff has noted that the applicant will be responsible for including all improvements to TH19 as required by the County as part of the construction plans for the development, and that the developer will be responsible for constructing these improvements, which will include the construction of a new median crossing within the TH19 right-of-way, the removal of the existing median crossing, construction of a trail trough this median. and the installation of turn lanes into the development. Watershed Districts. The project area lies within two watershed districts. the Valley Branch Watershed District and the South Washington Watershed District. Both entities have previous provided comments to the City as part of the EAW for the. project, and the PUBLIC REARM ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM 10 developer will need to secure permits from both watershed districts in order to proceed with the development as planned. EAW Comments, The City of Lake Elmo received comments from eight agencies as part of the EAW review. The City Council provided a response to the comments and ultimately approved the EAW. These comments will be kept on record and will be used to help guide the City's review of the preliminary and final construction plans for the site. Based on the above Staff report and analysis, Staff is recommending approval of the preliminary plat with several conditions intended to address the outstanding issues noted above and to further clarify the City's expectations in order for the developer to move forward with a final plat. The recommended conditions are as follows: Recommended Conditions of Approval: 1) Within six months of preliminary plat approval, the applicant shall complete the following: a) the applicant shall provide adequate title evidence satisfactory to the City Attorney; b) the applicant shall pay all fees associated with the preliminary plat; c) the applicant shall submit a revised preliminary plat and plans meeting all conditions of approval. All of the above conditions shall be met prior to the City accepting an application for final plat and prior to the commencement of any grading activity on the site. 2) The applicant shall dedicate a minimum of 30 feet of land around the "Exception" parcel in the northwest portion of the Savona subdivision to allow for the construction of an eight -foot bituminous trail to the western edge of the subdivision and to allow for sufficient room for drainage and utilities adjacent to "Street A", 3) The applicant shall provide for a minimum green belt/buffer of 100 feet around all of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision, and must revise the preliminary plat in the vicinity of Lots 1 and 2 of Block 10 to properly account for this buffer. 4) The eight -foot bituminous trail located within Outlot A shall be moved off of the property line of the adjacent Stonegate subdivision and shall be designed to continue into the property to the north and to provide a connection to "Street A" 5) The sidewalk along "Street A" must continue along this street until its termination point at the northern boundary of the subdivision. 6) The applicant shall work with the City and Washington County to identify and reserve sufficient space for a future trail corridor along the western right-of-way line of Keats Avenue. 7) The landscape plan shall be updated to include tree protection fencing in all areas where grading will be near trees intended for preservation. 8) The landscape plan shall be reviewed arid approved by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of a final plat and final construction plans. 9) Sidewalks shall be required on both sides of the public street providing access to the multi- family housing portion of the subdivision. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM I 1 10) The applicant shall be responsible for the construction of all improvements within the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) right-of-way as required by Washington County and further described in the review letter received from the County dated July 3, 2013. The required improvements shall include, but not be limited to: construction of a new median crossing, closure and restoration of the existing median crossing in this area, continuation of the planned ten -foot bituminous trail through the median, turn lanes, and other improvements as required by the County. 11 ) The developer shall follow all of the rules and regulations spelled out in the Wetland Conservation Act, and shall acquire the needed permits from the appropriate watershed districts prior to the commencement of any grading or development activity on the site. 12) The applicant shall submit revised preliminary plans that incorporate the changes made to the western portion of the preliminary plat, and specifically, the rearrangement of lots around the "Exception" parcel. 13) The applicant shall enter into a maintenance agreement with the City that clarifies the individuals or entities responsible for any landscaping installed in areas outside of land dedicated as public park and open space on the final plat. 14) The developer shall be required to pay a fee in lieu of park land dedication equivalent to the fair market value for the amount of land that is required to be dedicated for such purposes in the City's Subdivision Ordinance less the amount of land that is accepted for park purposes by the City. Any cash payment in lieu of land dedication shall be paid by the applicant prior to the release of the final plat for recording. 15) Any land under which public trails are located will be accepted as park land provided the developer constructs said trails as part of the public improvements for the subdivision. 16) The applicant shall provide for an active recreation area (either public or private) within the multi -family portion of the subdivision. This area shall be sufficient for a small play structure or other similar improvement subject to review and approval by the Planning Director. 17) The applicant shall work with the City Engineer to realign "Street A" and "Street E" as one continuous through street with a design that accommodates the anticipated traffic volume. The street should be continuous, but remain curvilinear to mitigate traffic speeds. 18) No more than half of the residential units depicted on the preliminary plat (155) may be approved as part of a final plat until a second access is provided to the subdivision, either via a connection to Hudson Boulevard to the south or Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) to the west. 19) Any future realignment of 5'1 Street must be approved by the City as an amendment to the preliminary plat. 20) The applicant must enter into a separate grading agreement with the City prior to the commencement of any grading activity in advance of final plat and plan approval, The City PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a. — ACTION ITEM 12 Engineer shall review any grading plan that is submitted in advance of a final plat, and said plan shall document extent of any proposed grading on the site. 21) The preliminary grading, drainage and erosion control plan must be revised to address the comments from the City Engineer in his review letter dated July 9, 2013 regarding the size of specific ponds in relation to the drainage areas that are served by these ponds. 22) The preliminary plans must be revised to incorporate all proposed improvements within the 5th Street right-of-way. All improvements as requested by the City shall be included in these plans and the design shall be consistent with City specifications and with the concept plan prepared for the City by Damon Farber and Associates. 23) All required modifications to the plans as requested by the City Engineer in a review letter dated July 9, 2013 shall be incorporated into the plans prior to consideration of a final plat. Specific requirements include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the BP Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas line, if necessary. b. The applicant must provide the city a letter of approval to perform the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and storm water pondixig. 24) The preliminary plat and preliminary plans shall only be approved upon the ordering of the 429 public improvement project for Section 34 by the City Council. If the City Council does not order this project, the applicant must revise the preliminary plans to provide adequate utilities to serve the subdivision. Any such plan revisions will be subject to review and approval by the City Council. 25) The applicant shall secure any necessary permits for the multi -family area, including but not limited to a conditional use permit to allow for single family detached residences that do not have frontage on a public street, at the time a final plat is submitted for this area. 26) The applicant is encouraged to preserve or re -use as many trees as possible that are currently located on the foiiner golf facility property and to incorporate these trees as part of the landscape plan for the Savona subdivision. 27) The applicant shall work with the Planning Director to name all streets in the subdivision prior to submission of a final plat. DRAFT FINDINGS Staff is recommending that the Planning Commission consider the following findings with regards to the proposed Savona preliminary plat: 4. That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan and the Future Land Use Map for this area. PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM 13 That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's Urban Low Density Residential and Urban Medium Density Residential zoning districts. That the Savona preliminary plat complies with all other applicable zoning requirements, including the City's landscaping, storm water, sediment and erosion control and other ordinances. That the Savona preliminary plat complies with the City's subdivision ordinance. That the Savona preliminary plat is consistent with the City's engineering standards with one exception as noted by the City Engineer in his review comments to the City dated July 9, 2013. RECCOMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission recommend approval of the Savona preliminary plat with the 27 conditions of approval as listed in the Staff report. Suggested motion: "Move to recommend approval of the Savona preliminary plat with the 27 conditions of approval as drafted by Staff" ATTACHMENTS: I. Preliminary Landscape Plan Review Comments 2. Application Form (3) 3. Property Owner Contact Information 4. Woodland Evaluation Report 5. Review Comments: a. City Engineer b, Washington County c. Building Official d. Valley Branch Watershed District 6. 5th Street Concept Plans (Damon Farber Associates) 7, Updated Preliminary Site Plan 8. Preliminary Plat and Plans (23 sheets) ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction ........ , ...... ........... ........ . ........ . .......... Planning Staff Report by Staff Planning Staff Questions from the Commission ...... ..... Chair & Commission Members Open the Public Hearing Chair Close the Public Hearing ........ ...... ............ ..... ...... ............ Chair Discussion by the Commission Chair & Commission Members Action by the Commission Chair & Commission Members PUBLIC HEARING ITEM 4a — ACTION ITEM Response Matrix Savona Plat Pubic Hearing Questions Lake Elmo Planning Department — 7129113 The following issues and comments were raised during the public hearing and subsequent Planning Commission discussion concerning the Savona preliminary plat. Staff has identified the significant comments that were stated at the meeting and offers the following responses: Issue/Comment Density ofthe proposed development Staff Response The Cit/sinitial work todetermine appropriate densities within the future sewer service areas (both for |'94and the Village) used the gross acreages ofcurrent parcels 0zdetermine the overall number ofRECunits that was planned for development area. This allowed the City tn prepare a plan that demonstrated compliance with the minimum REC unit thresholds that are established inthe k4OUbetween the City and Met Council without needing tostudy the development potential nfeach and every potential development site. Please note that these numbers therefore do not take into account how much area within each parcel could or could not be developed due to issues unique tn each site /wetlands,open water, steep slopes, poor soils, heavily forested areas streets, trails, etc.\. For purposes ofdetermining anallowed density for the Comprehensive Plan, the City decided touse anet density calculation, which removes the areas devoted tostreets, parks, wetlands, open space, and other similar activities outside ofthe actual areas that are developed. This results inasomewhat higher density calculation than would otherwise beachieved using gross acreages because you have less land inwhich to accommodate the same number ofunits, The benefit of using this system is that a developer only receives "credit" for land that can bedeveloped, and put more bluntly, they donot receive any rights todevelop land that otherwise cannot bedeveloped. Focusing onthe Savona development, the Otysrough density calculations usinQ2.S units per acre as the lowest permitted density projected that there would be23Ounits built onthe area guided for low density development onthis property. The applicant is proposing to plat 188 residential lots, which is below the gross density amount. When translated toanet density calculation the density number increases to closer tothree units per acre, but this isprimarily due tothe large amounts ofroad right-of-way, open space, and storm water management areas that have been planned aspart pf�the development. Use cfdensity ranges inthe Comprehensive Plan More park space may beneeded to serve the proposed development Most importantly, the 3units per acres |sconsistent with the Ch»'sComprehensive Plan for the urban low density residential planning areas, which are guided for I.6to4units per acre net density. |norder tnplan for growth within sewereddevelopment areas, the City has chosen todifferentiate between different residential land uses using arange ofdensity values (expressed \nunits allowed per ucre). h\sauniversally accepted practice inthe planning field to deal with residential land uses in this manner since notwo sites ordevelopment projects are going {obeable to meet aspecific density orunit count exactly. The ranges are intended toset aboundary between different types ofresidential uses while still providing enough detail tofacilitate planning for transportation, utilities, parks, and other components of a comprehensive plan. In Lake E/mo's case, the Comprehensive Plan identifies residential development below 4units anacre aslow density, between 4.S and 7.Sunits per acre asmedium density, and anything above 7.5 units per acre as high density. In the past, the [|1y has only needed toestablish amaximum density count for development in rural areas because there was noother land use category that allowed residential development, /norder \oachieve the REC unit counts asrequired under the K4OUwith the Met Council, the City must allow for densities that exceed those classified aslow density residential. The City ofLake Elmo was successful innegotiating amodest reduction tothe densities that would have otherwise been required hythe Met Council prior tosubmitting the land use plan that was ultimately approved bythe Met Council. The Met Counci|'spolicies require that Cities connecting tothe regional sanitary sewer system adopt residential densities with a minimum pf3.S units per acre. The City of Lake Elmo received approval for densities down to 2.5 units per acre at the |ouv and of the range. The Planning Department will bepresenting amap showing the [ity'sexisting parks )nthe areas surrounding the Savona subdivision at the meeting. Staff has recommended that the City accept the park land dedications that have been included onthe � preliminary plat with the understanding that: 1) the City has 17 | existing parks in addition to the regional park reserve that current provide recreation space for residents, 2\these parks all have maintenance and operational needs that must be met, 3\ additiona\ parks wK\be dedicated to the City as future projects / are brought forward, and 4) construction ufthe planned trail improvements will provide a more significant benefit tothe residents ofthe area than additional park space. 2 Park commission response Location of trails and pathways Park design Use ofpark feexinlieu ofland dedication On'streetpark)ng The applicant will also bepresenting aconceptual layout ofthe larger park area within Savona for consideration bvthe Planning Commission in order to better illustrate how this area could be used for park and recreation purposes. � Shane Weiss, who isthe chair ofthe Lake Elmo Park Commission, has been asked tnattend the Planning Commission meeting on July I9'htodiscuss the Park Commission's review ofthe Savona Plat and tnreview related park issues with the Planning Commission. iStaff has revised one ofthe conditions ofapproval torequire that �the trails belocated closer tothe Savona lots and further away !from the adjacent properties, � The design for any park areas will need to be addressed by the ' City inthe future. The Park Commission is presently working ona ' resident survey todetermine the types offacilities and amenities that the City's residents would like to see in park areas. This work � will beused tohelp guide future decisions concerning park � improvement projects, Lennarwas asked toprepare aconceptual ' layout ofthe larger park area within Savona using some ofits existing developments aoanexample. These concepts are attached for consideration bythe Planning Commission. � TheOty's Park Plan, which is component ofthe Comprehensive . Plan, calls for aseries ofneighborhood parks along the |'94 .corridor and alarger community park/sports complex that would � bebuilt inthe Village planning area, Since land dedication requirements alone would not beenough toacquire theneeded ! land for acommunity park, any fees inlieu ofland dedication will ultimately help pay for this community -wide amenity. The [ity's Park Plan also plans for afairly extensive trail system, which could . beconstructed using funds from the park fund. !The City has developed astandard for new streets that has been i reviewed bvStaff, including the City Engineer, Public Works Department, Fire Department, and Planning Department. The streets proposed bythe applicant are consistent with this standard, which has been designed toallow for parking onstreet while still allowing sufficient maneuvering room for cars and trucks onthe street. All of the proposed streets are very low volume residential streets and will not see a large amount of traffic other than the trips generated bythe residents within the neighborhood, |ngeneral, Staff does not anticipate that there will besignificant demand foron'street parking within the Savona subdivision, In cases where every heavy demand might beexpected, a wider As with most development issues, there is always going to be a compromise between various design elements for asite. \nthis � case, the proposed street width of28feet isareasonable compromise that will keep the street somewhat narrow (which will help reduce speeds and calm trafDc),while still allowing on - street parNng\namannarthatvvUlnot\nterfenevxiththeabiUty toaccess the homes \nthis subdivision. Play areas and the use ofstreets by The Savona subdivision includes sidewalks and/or trails children throughout the development tohelp safely move pedestrians from one point to another. The proposed parks within Out|ntF and Out|otKare intended toprovide space for children toplay, The use ofthe driving lanes within streets bypedestrians is generally discouraged for safety reasons, although the "complete streets" movement encourages streets tobedesigned for all users of transportation systemn. By including sidewalks and trails and keeping the width ofthe roadways atareasonable amount, the applicant has recognized that the streets will bemoving more than just cars and trucks. Developer performance The developer will berequired toenter into anagreement with the City that guarantees the completion ofall required improvements, including streets, trails, sidewalks, utilities, and landscaping. This agreement will beincluded aspart ofany application for final plat, The City has adopted a revised developer's agreement that is intended to avoid some of the non- compliance issues that have been observed in some previous subdivisions, Street ^A" and "E" realignment At the direction of the Planning Commission, Staff has removed Condition #I7,which would have required the applicant turealign two of the streets within the subdivision. Landscape plan review for One ofthe conditions ofapproval requires that the landscape appropriate trees plan be reviewed by professional forester or landscape architect. One ofthe reasons for this review will betnensure that the proper trees are being selected for the p(an. Single family and townhouse design The City has decided not to require design review for single family homes, which compromise the majority ofthe Savona Plat. As currently drafted, the multi -family area will besubject \othe Cby'sdesign standards. This review will beconducted atthe time of final plat rev(evv. Financial impacts of proposed The developer will be required to construct all improvements development within the subdivision that are required toserve the Savona Subdivision, including sewer, water, roads, and other required infrastructure. The applicant has also agree toparticipate ina regional assessment project that will assess all property owners in this area for the trunk sewer and water main extensions necessary to provide these service to the Savona site and all surrounding properties, Pedestrian crossings The proposed construction plans will include appropriate pedestrian crosswalks where sidewalks and traibcross 5`1Street Townhouse outlots Written comments Revision to conditions of approval and Keats Avenue, The applicant has indicated that the townhouses will be developed asacommon interest community, This means that a homeowner's association would own all ofthe common property around the site structures. All structures will need tocomply with the [it/szoning regulations for yard setbacks, access, impervious coverage limits, and other requirements whether or not each home isplatted onseparate lot. Staff |xanticipating that the developer ofthe properly tothe west ofSavona (4nmarisHomes) will besubmitting comments opposed to the alignment ofSmStreet ao depicted on the preliminary plat. |n particular, this developer would like to see the road moved further tothe south order toprovide amore optimal alignment through the property currently owned by the Louis Damiani Trust. Atthis point intime, the property owner (Dale Properties) has not come toany agreement with Lennarorthe developer tothe west concerning arealignment ofthe roadway, Dale properties has sent the City an email (attached) stating their willingness to continue discussions with both parties to make the requested adjustment before the final plat isrecorded, Axoriginally drafted, one ofthe conditions ofapproval noted that arealignment ofS,'Street must beapproved asanamendment tothe final plat. Staff has suggested revising this condition to specify that the realignment may becompleted prior to submission ofafinal plat for this area inorder toprovide the three impacted parties with additional time tonegotiate onthis matter. Based on discussion from the previous Planning Commission meeting, Staff has made revision tothe recommended conditions of approval. inorder tofacilitate the Commission's review, the proposed changes are noted inthe document. THEOTf()F L�A �� K�}� �� LMO ~ Savona Preliminary Plat Review — Preliminary Landscape Plan Prepared by Lake Elmo Planning Staff 7'17'1@ o Preliminary Landscape Plan Review o Landscaping requirements related todevelopment activity are currently addressed <nthe Cit/s Subdivision Ordinance, more specifically atPreliminary Plat. The Subdivision Ordinance requires two types nftree plantings: general and boulevard plantings, o The [ih/o Subdivision Ordinance /§153.07.F.8.b\ requires the developer to install trees ata minimum of6trees (deciduous: I inch caliper, coniferous: 3' in height) per acre within the subdivision. The site is1l2.6acres, requiring 676trees, or676caliper inches oftree planting to meet the general requirement, o Regarding boulevard plantings, the [it/sSub6ivision Ordinance /§I53.07.F.8.c\ requires tree plantings atarate of2per 1OOlineal feet and aminimum of1.Sinch caliper insize. The proposed subdivision includes 31,3Z9linear feet ofstreet. This translates to6J7boulevard trees, orQ4Ucaliper inches asrequired boulevard plantings, o Per the [hx'n Subdivision Ordinance, the total required plantings translate to 1,303total trees, ur1,61Gtotal caliper inches oftree plantings. u Per the Savona Preliminary Landscape Plan, the applicant is proposing to plant 1,228 total trees, translating to3,07Dtotal ca|ipe,inches. The applicant has noted that the following plant materials are included in the Preliminary Landscape Plan: N 690DverstoryTrees, minimum 2.Sinch caliper � 153Ornamental Trees, minimum 1.5 inch caliper � ]8SEvergreen Trees, minimum 6'height o Staff has reviewed the Preliminary Landscape Plan and determined that it meets the intent of the ordinance due tothe fact that the size ofthe plant materials greatly exceeds the minimum requirements or thresholds, Despite the fact that the proposed number of trees included in the plan is less than the number technically required per the City's Subdivision Ordinance, the Preliminary Landscape Plan greatly exceeds the minimum amount of 1,616 caliper inches required. 8yutilizing larger and more mature plant materials and trees than the [ity's Ordinance requires, the proposed plan would install 3,O70total caliper inches oftrees, nearly twice the amount ofthe minimum threshold, o Staff has reviewed the boulevard plantings and determined that the Preliminary Landscape Plan meets the [it/srequirements for boulevard trees. o Regarding the proposed collector road that is included inthe Preliminary Plat application, Staff has reviewed the location and type of plantings adjacent to the collector and found that the design should provide an effective buffer to the residential lots proposed in the development. o Staff recommends that the Final Landscape Plan be reviewed by an independent forester or landscape architect in advance of the approval of Final Plat and Final Construction Plans, Savona Preliminary Plot Review — Preliminary Landscape Plan Fee City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM E Comprehensive Plan Amendment F- Z01) ing District Amendment ji Text Amendment Flood Plain C.1.1,P, Conditional Use Permit Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) APPLICANT: TELEPHONES FEE OWNER: TELEPHONES: PROPERTY LO Varian • (See below) D Minor Subdivision Lot Line Adjustment Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan 7 Site & B uilding Plan Review / z)//s/4 (Name) 1 (fvaiiing/Address) siciential Subdivision irninary/Finat Plat 0 01. - 10 Lots 0 11 - 20 Lots 21 Lots or More D Excavating & Grading Permit E Appeal S'oifc 60o kt- 3or rttr-n—eT (Work) (Mobile) . (Name) (MalUng Address) (Home) (Work) (Mobile) ATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): (Fax) A-1-0 et Pio 2. 92-43 Aye,00?j Pz. 97/s yoctnv, 4/02. 2.,/ / 000f, -7 tie 2 f / 41/02011, DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: Sc)/ ,‘ati'vf'Sice4— 4PD s Ge4? P/tr47 /0 /1 fe;-; p 1.1.‘ Aj 6744- ( PUB S-C'Y'f (Zip) Le,K (Zip) .?4(42-12-/ te 2-Coot Ctcep7 *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows: In signing this application,' hereby acknowledge that 1 have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and Subdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. 1 further acknowlecive the fee explanation as outlined in the application procedures and hereby azree to nay all statements eceived from the'City pertaining- to additional ,nplication expense,. C.) L4,7 d1,41.1'.". ).071/2003 City of Lake Elmo • 3 ate A oilcan mc Ave,nue North •1..,akc aitho• 55042 • 651-777-5510 ° Fax 65 {-777-9615 rr Date City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM D Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning District Amendment 0 Text Amendment 0 Flood Plain C.U.P, Conditional Use Permit 0 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) APPLICANT: (.7.00P0(4 (Name) TELEPHONES: Efi'S VI;;C Ttk; rtir—Lef FEE NER; A - (Name) TELEPHONES: (Home) LJ variance(See below) ED Minor Subdivision 0 Lot Line Adjustment Li Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan Pee �Reidntia1 Subdivision Preliminary/Final Ptat 0 01 - 10 Lots 0 11 - 20 Lots $( 21 Lots or More Excavating & Grading Permit D Appeal D PUD 1: Site & Building Plan Review utfi;fr. GOO 4/(3/4 ^e• E"-A-, (3 3°C 363."'/Ivt. P40.,•wri4, AtAi Address) (all?) (Work) -2-y?-gpiy 6/z - 4e94 P?k, (Mobile) (FaY/ Address) (Mobile) PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) LegaI Description): 134102.9.--13‘e000; 3qyz-9-z/.3 '-el4eptY/ c-10 Ge4 A- / DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: i Pir 4 ' [...A- I ‘otit, 16 7t-'ne-"-zZit 9 vt< /Z6v;e4—, (Fax) ‘ce46/04,.(-4,1' evar . Co (Zip) 410 2-'72-i tezestzve *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows; tt signingapplication, I hereby ariowledgo that 1 have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and bdivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. J further ack.nowleke the fee explanation as outlined in the annlication procedures and herein, Dame o oav all statements received from theCitv pertainins to additional nofication exnense. 4.te C • 9 0.."‹. I-071/2093 City sfLe ;no • 3S0LAvcole Avoluc North • Lake. Milo • 55042 •• 651-777-5510 • Fax 651-777-9515 1 Applicant LJ Comprehensive Plan Amendment Zoning District Amendment Text Amendment 0 Flood Plain C,U,P, Conditional Use Per,Mit 0 Conditional Use Parra (CUP. City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM , Residontial.Subdivision. Preliminary/Final Plat 0 01— 10 Lots O l —20 Lots _< 21 Lots or More 0-Excavating & GradirigPermit Appeal 0 PUD coit 401:) ti• 00Z/P,144.(0....-444,4r•e0'44-- (,17.1Oblia)- (aY) Var.*Ianee 'I" (See below) 0 Minor Suhclivisien LotLine Adjustment El Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan siti.&-Bitilding Plan Review A PK. I CANT: 41164, (1.), ,/)/(3/4 t41-.- ng/Addres0 TELEP HONES: 7-417v4e.4;S2-xYF-P/ OWNER: 5r47L164- TELEPHONES: (Name) (1-1eMa) cWqrk) (Mai Addressl (Work 430s-- Fee ,(pApbita), PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and CoMplete (Long)Legal Description): 4):1-- 0 0 5 1q62. 92-4.4y,e,003) z f / 40,,e,00,t/ . S" DEE:TAILED REASON FOR R5QUEST: S()ta•teiGe r'S 47 en.- qee.,...ctit1/4, krh,i4A-t. (Fax) '(Z1p) *VARIANCE REQUESTS As outlined in Section 3:01,060 C..of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicantruust demonstrate a hardship 'before a. variaricc; can be granted, Tice hardship related to this application i_s follows tu sguing thiz apprnatioti, L hereby acknowledge that [ have a!and fully understand the applicable provisions ofthe Zoning and Subdiviskn Ordinances and current administrative procedures. 1 ftirther acismo,,viedae the fee emilmation as out -lined in 'application procedures and-. hereby area to Inv al statements received from the -City pertainipa.to additioua) 'cation expense, Applicant P7v4-ev CityChy1f Luke Elmo 3 MILavente hyena: Nora EA( 't.) •55042 677 Fa 65-777-%i$ Date PropertyOwners: PID # 3402921410004 Frandsen Bank & Trust cio DF and Company, Ine, 5481 St. Croix Trail, Ste. 200 North Branch, MN 55056 Attn: Jim Ertz PIThrs 3402921340003, 3402921340001, 3402921310001, 3402921420001 Dale Properties LLC 6007 Culligan Way Minnetonka, MN 5_ 45 Attn: Alan J. Dale Westwood MEMORANDUM Date: March 8, 2013 Re: Lake Elmo Property Woodland Evaluation Report File: 20121161.00 To: Lennar 6305 36th Ave. N., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 From: Kelly Kunst 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952-937-5150 FAX 952-937-5822 TOLL FREE 888-937-5150 www.vvestwoodps.com PROJECT PURPOSE AND DESCRIPTION At the request of Lennar, Westwood Professional Services (Westwood) completed a woodland evaluation of the Lake Elmo Property (Site) which is located in the S 1/2 of Section 34, T29N, R21W, City of Lake Elmo, Washington county, Minnesota (Exhibit 1). The Site was comprised of approximately 112.5 acres of land located in the northwest quadrant of the intersection of Interstate 94 and Keats Avenue North (CSAH 19). The Site contains all or portions of parcel numbers 34.029.21.41.0004, 34.029,21,42.0001, 34.029.21.34.0001, 34.029.21.34.0003, and 34.029.21.31.0001. The Site was primarily agricultural land which made up approximately 70 acres on the west part of the Site. The eastern 40 acres contains a former golf driving range. Within cropped areas are four uncropped pockets vegetated with mature trees. Approximately seven acres of open meadow is located in the south-central part of the Site. Other concentrations of trees included a wooded fencerow, landscape plantings and two mature white pine stands located on the driving range. The Site was assessed on March 6, 2013. The purpose of this evaluation is to provide sufficient information to assist in the prioritization of significant trees on the Site to be considered in development planning. Exhibit 2 provides an aerial photograph of existing conditions on the Site and the location of features discussed in this report. WOODLAND EVALUATION SUMMARY There are no high -quality, natural woodlands on the Lake Elmo Site, As indicated. the trees that are present consist of landscape plantings and two stands of mature white pine on the driving range portion of the property, and remnant trees on uncropped portions of the west part of the Site. Land and Energy DFVELOPME Ni CONSUL E E Lff f E; Lake Elmo Property Woodland Evaluation Report March 8, 2013 Page 2 The primary landscape trees on the east part of the Site consist of Norway spruce (Picea abies) Colorado spruce (Picea pungens) and white pine (Pinus strobus). These species make up all of the linear plantings that can be seen in the aerial photograph on the driving range, These trees generally range from 10 to 25 feet in height with a diameter breast height (dbh) between 4 to 8 inches. There are two areas in the north -central and southwest corner of the driving range where there are stands of mature white pine approximately 40 to 50-feet in height with dbh's between 12 to 20 inches. Scattered saplings of honey locust and box elder were also observed in this part of the Site. The main fencerow, oriented north to south through the center of the cropped part of the Site, was comprised primarily of mature red and bur oak (Quercus rubra and Q. macrocarpa) and included pockets of box elder (Acer negundo). The red and bur oaks were generally greater than 20 inches dbh. Red and bur oak trees that were large (> 14" dbh), structurally sound, had good fool', and were relatively disease free were noted and surveyed in the field. The canopy of the uncropped areas in the agricultural field was made up entirely of box elder with the exception of the westernmost area which also contained some red and bur oak. Other observed tree species included scattered eastern red cedar (Juniperus virginiana) in the meadow areas in the west part of the Site, and some mature red pine in the southwest part of the driving range. SUITABILITY FOR DEVELOPMENT There are no natural, high -quality woodland areas on the Lake Elmo Site. Existing woodland consists of landscape plantings and small rernnants of native oaks and pines. What exists on the site could be utilized as screens between different portions of the development, or as a structural basis for development of parks or other natural features in the development. Please feel free to contact me with any questions you may have with regard to the woodland evaluation. You may reach me by phone at (952) 906-7421 or by email at kelly.kunst@westwoodps.com. Sincerely, Kelly Kunst Environmental Scientist Attachments Exhibits Land arc: Energy Map Oncoment: PA2012t • ee gExtrod .3/8/2013 1;0643 PM (K) 2013 P-EftO-NEEN ErmAcNE, ,ro.„ 0 ONN SEN,41,!: EN,,EENE,1 q,EvEy Ce1e1 4 2:012 LIEGE ORO (EOM 20 1 ,) Wort -woad ProflonI Senkes, Inc. 7039AhrojrarnOrfvE Eder; Prairie. MN 5E344 PHONE 952-937-5152 PEE ES.1-437,582 TOO,PREE 1-e50-53515110 Awk•Amstietrodps.con, 41.) '7 3 , 4 k k e ir t7. lkek'ke f -t• 9th,StAt - I Feet 2,000 Legend Site Boundary tvt ";( a ; ,-; 1 ITH_94_,..... Sirtii9411-;--- , / &la; .4..t.,!; -. r ., ' 17,D 1-> r-• --..-''' ) '1 ,i', - 11: 1 iteIge Rd . r-'016' Lake Elmo Property Lake Elmo, Minnesota Site Location & USGS Topography _XHIBIT 1 \ 20121 '31 4nEfrnoite3s_Ex2 rnx,1 '1,3,3313 -1:10:3APM Westwood P sooM Seri. D,,tA rf 51:1,3y 13,1311.1/12:", Sti9F'.510 83°, "f ('.1341 113,3S rm,-; E P,TA3-33p, A rItAR 2,/ 1?) 11V Profeqq1nrea/ c,krvirrs.q. I'M.. 764S 11,4g,431 n,vn Ed ert Prairie, 511155344 F'14051E 352-937-5150 fA 2-q57.5a22 TOIL MEE 1,a68.9:17.51f:Ck Www,m351torlortmentr Feet 400 Legend Surveyed Red and Bur Oaks Site Boundary 6 Wooded Pockets Mature White Pine Lake Elmo Property Lake Elmo, Minnesota Existing Conditions EXHIBIT 2 MEMORANDUM Date: July 9,ZD13 To: Kyle KlattPlanning Director [c: Nick Johnson, City Planner Ryan 3temspksi'9.E,Assistant City Engineer From: Jack Griffin, P.E,City Engineer ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Gehmren,P.[ Jack Griffin, P.E, Ryan StennpskiP'E. Chad |sukuun P.E. Re; Savona Preliminary Plat Review 651.300.4261 651.380.4264 651'300.4267 651.300.4285 An engineering review has been completed for the Savona development by LennarCorporadon. A Preliminary Plan submittal was received on June 26, 201I The submittal consisted of the following documentation prepared by Westwood Professional Services, Inc.: w Preliminary Plans dated March I8 2O13;with revision date June 14 20I3. Preliminary Storm Water Runoff Narrative, dated May 10, 2013. STATUS/FINDINGS- The following comments summarize the proposed infrastructure plans, and identify specific design elements that must be addressed to facilitate approval of the preliminary plat. Additional engineering recommendations have also been provided tmidentify issues that must beaddressed wramended aopart pfthe final plat and/or final construction plans. GENERAL REQUIREMENTS AND COMMENTS 1. The applicant has requested on exception to the city standards to allow for a 6.5Y6 sidewalk grade along Streets Eand F.The maximum allowable grade along residential streets is&%. However, the maximum allowable street grade with a sidewalk is 6.0%. Engineering recommends approval of this exception, 1 No additional design exceptions have been noted and requested in writing by the applicant. Therefore all infrastructure systems will be reviewed and accepted by the city upon meeting city design standards. 3. The applicant must provide the city letter ofapproval to perform the proposed work inthe 8P Pipeline easement. Work includes installation of storm sewer pipe, grading activities, and relocation of the High Pressure Gas, iynecessary. 4. The applicant must provide the city a letter ofapproval to per -form the proposed work in the Electrical Transmission easement areas. Work includes installation of storm sevve, pipe, grading activities, and storm water pnndinQ. STREETS AND TRANSPORATION 1, Access: The primary access tothe site is from CSAH 19 (Keats Avenue), The location of the access point is acceptable to the County (per letter dated July ], 2013) and is consistent with the dt/s plans for afuture Collector Road (5m3treet). Z The applicant's preliminary plat submittal should include o commitment by the applicant to provide the CSAH 19 improvements recommended by the County. These improvements should be part of the applicant's proposal. 3. Secondary access has not been addressed by the proposo|. The applicant believes that secondary access will occur through the platting ofsurrounding developments (Hammes Estates to the north, Montgomery PAGE 1 of 4 properties to the west, or Dale Properties to the south). Because the platting of future developments is outside of the control of the applicant, a secondary access plan (contingency plan) should be included as part of this proposa|. The development phasing should be limited to allow up to 170 homes (west to Street G) until secondary access is made available acceptable tothe city. 4. Collector Rood: The dedication of right-of-way (R/VV) and the construction of a Collector Roadway (51h Street), as identified in the c)ty'xComprehensive Plan, is critical transportation element necessary to support this development, 5. The proposal indicates the dedication of 1]8feet ofR/VV as requested by the city to provide for u Parkway design meeting state aid street design requirements for lane widths, dear zones' and curb reaction distances. This dedication should remain a part ofthis development application. 6, Engineering is recommending that additional R/VV be provided at Sth Street and the future street intersection to Hudson Boulevard (through Dale Properties) to accommodate a future roundabout intersection. 7. The design and construction of 5th Street will be needed to support this development and other development in the 194 Corridor. The city is requesting a Parkway design with center turn lanes, right turn lanes, and a center median, The proposal must be revised to incorporate the design elements outlined in the c/ty'sthominQ plan, including street lighting. Q. The design of 5th Street, and its adjacent sidewalks and trails, must meet Municipal State Aid design standards for urban streets (8820.9935) for ADT> I0,000 and over45 mph. No state aid variances can be allowed. 9. Access spacing a|onO5th Street is allowed at 1/8 noUe intervals for non -continuous local streets' st% mile intervals for continuous local streets and collector streets, and at B mile intervals for streets with higher classification. Access spacing proposed along SthStreet bacceptable tothe city. 10. Internal street network: The internal streets are shown consistent with city standards for right-of-way and width, including cul-de-sacs. 11. Two street extensions are provided for continuation to the north consistent with Hammes Estates concept plans. 12. The plat also indicates two street extensions to the west, which is not consistent with the concept plans for the westerly adjacent property. Agreement of future street extensions to the west must be achieved and the preliminary plat revised accordingly, ifnecessary. 13. Engineering anticipates a higher than normal residential traffic volume passing through the Savona development as residential properties in Hammes Estates seek to gain access to 5th Street and the commercial properties tnbedeveloped south of5thStreet. Engineering strongly recommends that Street A and Street E be aligned as one continuous through street with a design that accommodates this traffic volume. The street should be continuous, but remain curvilinear to mitigate traffic speeds. 14. Sidewalks and Tro8:Sidewalks are shown along one side of each street serving the single family homes. A sidewalk is also shown along one side ofStreet L serving the multi -family homes. Street | should require a sidewalk on each side of the street. lS. The applicant has provided a 6'600tvvide sidewalk along the south side of Sth Street and an off -road 10- foot separated shared use trail along the north side ofSth Street. This is consistent with the dty's desire to create a regional trail connection from Manning to Inwood. STORK4VVATERK8ANAGEK8ENT I. The proposed development resides within both the Valley Branch Watershed D\st,ict(V8VVD) and the South Washington Watershed District (SVVVVD).The stormvvatermanagennent plan will therefore need to be compliant with the requirements of both watershed districts, as applicable, as well as the Lake Elmo storm water management ordinance. |tisthe applicant's responsibility tocreatively plan for adequate storm water pondinBand infiltration facilities. 2. The storm water facilities have been located in Dut|ots dedicated to the city for maintenance purposes. As the design progresses, all 100'year high water levels (HVVL) and HVVLove,flovvs must remain within a city Dudot PAGE 2 of 4 3. Maintenance access roads have been provided for the storm water facilities and included in Outlots, 4. All Rear lot drainage rwa>esand catch basins must indicate 1U0iearHVVLand be protected by drainage casements. S. Engineering continues to have concerns regarding the proposed Storm Water Management Plan. It is anticipated that revisions will be required as part of the final plat and construction plan review process that may require the applicant to potentially alter lot lines, and/or alter easement and Qut|ot boundaries. It will be the applicant's responsibility to amend the storm water management system to meet the various agency approvals and to amend the plat as needed to accomplish these approva|x. Engineering has previously requested the consolidation of pondin0 and infiltration facilities to address some of the following concerns: a. Infiltration basin 1 has a bottom elevation that is lower than the NVVL of Pond 1. b. Infiltration basin and Pond Z have a HVVLthat appears to saturate the road subbase of 5th Street. Greater horizontal and/or vertical separation may berequired. c Pond 3 is too small, of odd shape and receives only a 3.0 acre drainage shed. It is likely that this pond will not perform asintended. d. Pond S is too small and receives only a 5.3 acre drainage shed. It is likely that this pond will not perform asintended. e. Pond O has a HVVLthat may saturate the road subbase of 5th Street. Greater horizontal and/or vertical separation may berequired. SITE UTILITIES L As part of the final plat process, staff will continue to review for adequate utility easements for all sanitary sewer,vvatermain and storm sewer piping. Easement widths must be labeled for each pipe and shown on the utility plans, Easement widths must be a minimum of3Ofeet, Wider easements may be required for deep pipes tomeet OSHA excavation requirements. I Additional utility corridor widths may be required within the multi -family private driveway areas to allow for OSAH complaint maintenance access by the city. Areas to be adjusted include SW corner of Block 29, south end of Block 32, north end of Block 33, and storm sewer/retaining vvaU separation along the east side ofBlock 28. Sanitary sewer: l. Municipal sanitary sewer isavailable along Hudson Blmd, in the Eagle Point Business Park. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal sanitary sewer to the development site at developer's cost. 2. The applicant has initiated a4Z9 Public Improvement project to extend sanitary sewer from the Eagle Point Business Park tothe intersection uf[SAH 19 and 5th Street (indudinga lift station and furcemain). If this improvement is ordered by the City Council, this project will provide sewer service to the development consistent with the city comprehensive plan. The preliminary plat must be contingent upon the completion ofthis project. 3. The applicant must provide any necessary easements, at no cost to the city, to allow the 429 Public Improvement project tobcconstructed, 4. The applicant's proposal provides for an internal network of sanitary sewer piping that is consistent with city design standards and allows for phasing of the sewer system along with the phasing of the development. The detailed design of the sanitary sewer facilities may be addressed through the final plat process, N/otennu/n: I. Municipal water supply is available along Hudson Blvd. in the Eagle Point Business Park. The applicant is responsible to extend the municipal water supply to the development site atdeveloper's cost, 2. The applicant has initiated a 429 Public Improvement project to extend municipal water service from the Eagle Point Business Park to the intersection of [SAH 19 and 5th Street. If this improvement is ordered by the City Council, this project will provide water service to the development consistent with the city comprehensive plan. The preliminary plat must be contingent upon the completion of this project. 3. The applicant must provide any necessary easements, at no cost to the city, to allow the 429 Public Improvement project to be constructed, 4. As the development is constructed, the city may request some portions of the xvaterma)n to be oversized to 12'inch diameter pipe. The dty'spract|ce has been to reimburse the developer for oversize costs for pipe sizes over 8-inchdiameter, S. The applicant's proposal provides for an internal vvaterma(n network that is consistent with city design standards and allows for phasing of the xvaternoa\n along with the phasing of the development, The detailed design ofthe waterma(nfacilities may be addressed through the final plat process. GRADING AND EROSION CONTROL 1. The retaining wall located along the west side of Block 28 should remain on Outlot K, remaining private property owned bythe HOA. 2. A more defined swale should be considered along the west side of Block 20 to protect against flooding, 3. The grading plan should be revised to better define the swale termination at the southeast corner of Block 38. A significant sua|e appears to terminate at the retaining wall, 4. Temporary drainage and erosion control provisions must be provided to capture the channeUoedflow from Street A and Block 2 as they discharge off site to the westerly property. SPECIFIC ENGINEERING REQUIREMENTS: The following issues should be addressed as part ofthe final plat process, These issues should be addressed in a point by point response letter to expedite city review. I. Final Construction Plans and Specifications for improvements on the County Road system must be reviewed byWashington County, Comments received from the County shall buincorporated into Final Construction Plans for review by the city. Z. 4State Aid plan design set will berequired tofacilitate the design review ofthe construction plans. 3. Ageometdcs plan will be required for6th Street. Annotations alone, as provided in the preliminary plat, are not sufficient. 4. Cross Sections will be required as part of the construction plans for any portions of street and trail improvements that abut existing conditions (along the development edQes). This includes [3AH IQ turn lanes, 5. DraintUewiU be required as part ofthe street design per the city standards, 6. Sanitary sewer up tuZD-feetin depth can be 5DR 35. A0.IO foot drop is required across all sanitary sewer manholes. 7. 4min\mum 2Y6slope is required for all rear yard slopes, & Storm sewer design calculations must be provided as part nfthe final plat process 9. Plan standard details shall retain the Lake Elmo title block, Any changes proposed inthe standard details must be clearly identified in a "change request" letter by the developer's engineer. 10. The retaining wall west of Block 28 must be designed and certified by a Professional Engineer registered in the State ofMinnesota. Certified plans must be submitted to the city as part ofthe final plat. 11. Landscape details must bethe City of Lake E\nnm standard details and plan notes, 12. The grading plan should be revised in the area of Dut>nt G where the drainage svvale in Block 12 is directed to the back property ofLots 1 and I, Block 14. Additional berm protection should be considered. 13. The grading plan should be revised in the area of Out\otAwhere the drainage swa|e in Block I is directed to the back property of Lots 1 and 2, Block 10, Additional berm protection should be considered. PAGE 4 of 4 Public Works Department Donald J. Theisen, P.E. Director Wayne H, Sandberg, P.E. Deputy o`fectoclGoumyEngOee( July 3.2013 Kde0att Community Development Director City of Lake Elmo 3GO0Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, MN55O42 RE: Washington County comments mnthe preliminary plans and plat for the Savona Residential Development. City oYLake Elmo Dear Mr. KiaUt Thank you for providing the county with the preliminary plat andplans ofthe Savona Residential subdivision in Section34 Township 27.Range 21 City ofLake Elmo The project wiUnonsist of189single family lots and 122multi-family residential lots. Based onreview ofthe plans, vve offer the following comments and recommendations to consider as you process this subdivision application through the City of Lake Elmo: The proposed access pointonCSAH 18is acceptable Vothe County, A right -of way permit wilright-of ht-of wayos|t relates tothe development. AState Aid plan set iarequired with the application and include any grading, installation of culverts, installation of water and sewer services, left and right turn lanes on C8AH 18, pedestrian cpoeoinQo, parallel trail grading and deve|opment, if required, paving and athping, center median crossing namova\o, new center median crossings, signage and any landscaping and other improvements within county right-of-way. Since the proposed project wi|| generateadditional traffic pnCSAH1B/&eataAvenue, functionally classified a| an''A" Minor Arterial Floadvvoy` improvements tnCSAH 18/KemtoAvenue will need to be provided for access tn the collector roadway. These improvements include left and right turn lanes onthe oouthboundlane and aleft turn lane onthe northbound lane on C3AH 19. There should also be a new median crossing from the southbound lane to the northbound lane on CSAH 19 at the new collector street � The proposed project vvigenerategone�e pedestrian/ bicycle traffic(� on SAH 1QVNeatsAvenue which ioidentified inthe Washington County Comprehensive Plan 2O30osthe Central GreenwayRegional Trail. Pedestrians from the future development will need hmaccess the existing off road trail on the east side of CSAH 10RmotsAvonue. therefore o crossing onthe north side 0fthe new intersection will need k>bedesigned and constructed hoprovide this connection, * Although it is not in the City of Lake Bnno2030 Comprehensive Trail P|an, an off road parallel trail onthe west side nf CGAH 19/KemtsAvenue should bmconsidered bythe city as the development/subdivision proceeds through the city review process, This trail will link directly to the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve to the north and the City of Woodbury h/the south. 1160OMyomnRoad North, Stillwater, Minnesota 55082-X573 Phone� 651-430'4300 ' Fax: 851-430-4350 ^ TTY: 651~430-6246 www.00/woah\ngton.nm.un Equal Employment Opportunity / Affirmative Action Savona Subdivision July 3, 2013 Removal of the existing medians on CSAH 19/Keats Avenue shall be included in the plans, A signage plan for CSAH 19/Keats Avenue shall be prepared as it relates to the traffic improvements. • The developer or the city must submit the drainage report and calculations to our office for review of any downstream impacts to the county drainage system. Along with the drainage calculations, we will request written conclusions that the volume and rate of stormwater run-off into the county right -of way will not increase as part of the project. • Access control must be dedicated to Washington County along the CSAH 19/Keats Avenue frontage, except for the opening corresponding to the City's right of way for the collector roadway. Washington County's policy is to assist local governments in promoting compatibility between land use and highways. Residential uses located adjacent to highways often result in complaints about traffic noise. Traffic noise from this highway could exceed noise standards established by the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA), the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the U.S. Department of Transportation. Minnesota Rule 7030.0030 states that municipalities are responsible for taking all reasonable measures to prevent land use activities listed in the MPCKs Noise Area Classification (MAC) where the establishment of the land use would result in violations of established noise standards. Minnesota Statute 116.07, Subpart 2a exempts County Roads and County State Aid Highways from noise thresholds. County policy regarding development adjacent to existing highways prohibits the expenditure of highway funds for noise mitigation measures in such areas. The developer should assess the noise situation and take any action outside of County right of way deemed necessary to minimize the impact of any highway noise. If you have any questions or comments to the responses on the Savona EAW, please contact me at Ann.pung-terwedo@co.washington.mn.us. ely, Pung-Terwedo Senior Planner C: Carol Hanson, Office Specialist RJPIM Reviews/City of Lake ElmoiSavona7-3-2013 Nick Johnson From: Sent: To: Cc: Subject Good morning, Rick Chase Monday, July O8.2O138:Q3AM KWoK]att Nick Johnson Lennor/Preliminary Plans Comments on the plan are: l. Do we want to post a construction entrance? 1. Do we need a concrete wash -out area? 3- Can curb boxes be placed outside of driveway areas? This is in case they are repaired in the future and need to be excavated; the cost will be easier to manage the repairs. 4' Do we want to include a city standard for the water service? (Template). 5. Is there information on what type of multi unit dwellings will be built? Just some thoughts, let me know if there is anything I can assist with. Kick Chase, Building Official City of Lake Elmo rchase(@lakeelnm'nrg (w) 651-747-3910 (f) 651'777-9615 JohnF! Hanson DHanmon@zor .conl Friday, July 0520131047AM Kyle Klatt Savona and Ryland Homes (Landucci Property) Hi Kyle, Thanks for forwarding the information regarding the proposed comp plan amendment for the Ryland Homes project and the preliminary plan for the Savona residential subdivision, Both project ultimate|yvviUrequirepennksfromtheVaUey8ranchVVatemhedDistrict When complete permit applications are submitted, they'll be reviewed to ensure conformance to the VBWD rules and regulations. While the current request for the Ryland Homes project isfor ozoning change, the concept drawing attached likely will not conform tothe VBVVDrules and regulations because it shows ponds. V8VVDrequires stonnwmtervolume control, which istypically accomplished by bioretention basins (basins which drain dry within 48 hours), The developer should also he aware that the site drains to 1-94 and the nutrient -impaired St. Croix River. Therefore, /naddition tothe VBVVD requirements, phosphorus load reductions could be required to conform tothe TK4DL(total maximum daily load). VBWD previously submitted comments on the Savona EAW. Thank you, John John P.Hanson, PE Valley Branch Watershed District Engineer Barr Engineering Company 1 470DVY.77mSt. I EcUno' MN 55435 ihonsonCo,'bmn,conp I www,.boo.com qttt, STREET TREES 25' STREET LIGHTS I R RIG AT 10 NJ LAKE ELMO - 5TLI STREET CONCEPT )5' HISTORIC LIGHTS INTERSECTIONS et PERENNIALS SHRUBS BA N1\1E R POLES FENCE DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES DUNE 27, 2,)i3 S REE1 LIGHT tr, LAKE ELMO - 5TH STREET CONCEPT Lf-L t."171F7 HISTORIC LIGHTS @) INTERSECT IONS POLES LE 6,- 1 . . EENCE DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES NNE 27, 2014 TURF LAKE ELMO - 5TH STREET CONCEPT (.1‘. SPECIAL CONCRETE PERENNIALS SHRUBS ruRE DAMONFARBERASSOCIATES luNE 27, 2013 THE GITY01- City mfLake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 22, 2013 Chairman Williams called to order the meeting Dfthe Lake Elmo Planning Commission at COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Williams, Haggard, Larson, N1orrea\e, Dodson and Kre\mer; COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Reeves and Dorschner;and STAFF PRESENT: Planning Director K|att, City Planner Johnson and City Administrator Zulege,. Approve Agenda: The Planning Commission accepted the agenda aspresented. Approve Minutes: June 24, 2013 &4/S/P: Kreimer/Dodson, move to accept the minutes of June 24, 2013 as amended to include mention that the Hammes Estates Sketch Plan lacks a neighborhood park, Vote. 4-0, Motion Carried, with Haggard not voting. Public Hearing: Savona Preliminary Plot — Lennor Homes K|@tt began the Staff presentation by explaining the Planning Commission's o3(e in reviewing preliminary plat applications. He noted that plat applications are subject tO theOty's Subdivision Ordinance, wherein the rules of land subdivision are established. These ordinances include provisions related tugrading, streets, utilities, storm water management and other considerations related to establishing new subdivisions or other development. Klatt moved on to present a general overview of the Preliminary Plat application submitted bVUSHomes Corporation (LennarHo[nes). The subdivision islocated on11Z acres and includes 31Oresidential units. Hethen provided a location map that highlighted all the parcels nfland that are included iOthe application. Healso described the existing land uses that surround the proposed subdivision. Regarding utilities, Klatt noted that the applicant and other landowners in the area have submitted a petition to extend -sanitary sewer and water to the proposed development site west ofKeats Avenue North ([5AH 19). This project would extend utilities throughout the Stage 1 development area identified in the Comprehensive Plan, making Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 connection to sanitary sewer and water possible for other parcels in the area. The project also includes a lift station. k]attnoted that the parcels included inthe application are currently zoned Rural Development Transitional (RT). Asfar asthe history is concerned, the Planning Commission reviewed a Sketch Plan onDecember 1[L2O12. |naddition, the City Council approved the Environmental Assessment VVorksheetrequired for the project on]uk/I, 2013. Regarding the [itvs Comprehensive Plan, 0attexplained how the proposal relates bJ the Cit«sPlanned Land Use Map. The proposal isconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan in terms of land use, density and expected nunmbg, of residential units for the area. K|att noted that the proposal shifts the minor collector road in the 1-94 Corridor to the south. This change enlarges the area guided for Low Density Residential, asthe collector road serves asthe boundary inthe City'oComprehensive Plan. Moving on, Klatt described how the proposed subdivision compares to the City's zoning districts. He highlighted the basic details of the proposed residential lots that will be included inthe subdivision, Getting to the plat application itself, Klatt presented the basics of the proposal. In addition, he gave an overview/ regarding the Staff Report, Regarding action, 0att noted that Staff has identified 37 conditions of approval. The largest of these included the greenbelt buffer ofl8Ofeet, there needs to be adequate room fora 3Ofoot trail set back to the exception lot, the developer is responsible to install new median and a trail connection across Keats tothe East and the full 1096 park dedication. There were also a number of Engineer conditions that including a secondary access and realignment of the st,eet. These conditions would be required to be resolved in advance of Final Plat approval. K1att noted that the developer has requested to modify conditions 17, 18, and 24. Staff recommends that language can be added to condition #I8to aUovvsecondary access to the north. In addition, Staff iscomfortable with the language proposed for condition #24related tothe 429public improvement project. K|att did note some base findings for the Planning Commission, In addition, Klatt noted that Staff isrecommending that the Planning Commission recommend the preliminary plat application for approval to the City Council with 27 conditions of approval. K8o[rea}gnoted that hei3confused regarding the density inthe proposal. Hefelt that the proposal should adhere tothe |ovv end ofthe allowed density range, which is 2.5 units per net acre. K|attexplained that the comprehensive plan approved arange Vf density that was 2.5 to 4and was not specific to numbers, K|att also stated that it should be noted that this proposal is described in net density terms, which includes the park and open areas aswell, Lake Eli -no Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 Haggard asked about the requirements of parkland dedication vs. open space. K|a1t noted that the Comprehensive Plan does not require open space, but it is encouraged. The Subdivision Ordinance requires park/anddedication attime ofsubdivision (IO96in this case). Haggard also asked what the fee in lieu of parkland dedication xvVu\d be. K)attnoted that itwould bethe equal market value of4.8acres. Hgdid not venture what that would equate to. Williams asked what the determination of the Park Commission was regarding the Savona concept for parkland. Natt noted that Staff did locate the minutes for that nnaeting. There was nVformal motion from the Park Commission regarding the Savona [oncept. Williams also asked about acreage nfReid Park. 0attstated that Reid Park )s 2.6 acres with parking, 1.9 acres without. Larson asked about the park structures included in the tot lot. He would like to see seating and shade for people towatch their children. M0rPea}e asked why the City would accept fee in lieu of land dedication when there is a need for more parkland. K|ottnoted that the Parks Commission has expressed concern about the [ity'sability tomaintain additional parkland when there |s aneed for maintenance for the [it«'sexisting facilities. Staff felt that this development was so close to the Park Preserve that people in this development would probably use those facilities inaddition tnCity parkland. Kreirner asked if the applicant has to present the types of homes they intend to build, including information about pricing and architectural sty|e. Klatt noted that this type of information is typically not reviewed in a plat. Dodson asked about the budgetary/financial implications of the new development proposal. Administrator Zuleger noted that sewer and water extensions costs come from enterprise funds, and the tax revenue from the new homes will pay for additional public safety considerations, such as sheriff deputies and fire protectiVn. Haggard asked about the pedestrian crossings of 5 mStr2et. K(3ttnoted that with any improvement there would be a crosswalk, but no controlled intersection. Administrator Zu|egera|nn noted that there is a lO' bituminous trail on the north side of5"' Street and 6' sidewalk on the south side Vf5th Street. These facilities will aid pedestrian circulation on 5 mStreet. Haggard asked about the architectural design of the toxvOhorne area. Klatt noted that the applicant has not submitted any additional information and that it is not required until the final plat, Williams noted that there bonly somuch level wfdetail that the City can evaluate the proposal on at Preliminary Plat, Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes, 7-22-13 4 Morreale asked if the City is allowed to make the developer lower the density of the proposal tn2.5units per acre. K|attnoted that the Planning Commission would have to make findings that support why the request does not comply with the Comprehensive Plan. K>a1tnoted that the proposed density currently does comply with the requirements ofthe Comprehensive Plan, |fthe City wanted tostick tothe 2.5units per acre density requirement, the Comprehensive Plan would need to be amended to reflect this requirement. Williams asked about Out\ot K. K\att noted that the area includes all the common areas ofthe tovxnhonne portion of the development. Johnson noted that Out|ot Kis private and would bepart ofthe Homeowners Assoc. for the tnxvnhornes. This is consistent with a common interest community and the roads in Outlot K are private, The tovvnhnrnearea will also require aCUP for the current configuration, Williams asked about the wording of Condition #17, 18, and 24 per the applicant's request. Klatt shared the requested language of Condition #17 would be to work with the engineer to find the best solution for the road alignment, 18 would be that there be a secondary access to the north and I4xvou|d bethat there would be no final plat approval until the order ofthe 429improvements, Joe Jablonski, Lennar Homes, spoke representing the applicant. Regarding the discussion of density, he noted that the gross density of the single family area is I.04 units per acre. The net density isdriven upto3.Ounits per acre due tothe open space, storm water facilities, and roads that are included onthe site. Regarding different elevations and architectural styles,Mr. Jablonski highlighted the variety that Lgnnar brings in an attempt toavoid redundancy. There are currently 6.1acres in park land and that number could go up if the tot lot in the tovvnhorne area was included. In terms ofopen space and ponding,Jablonski noted that there is26.6acres, Regarding5m Street, Mr. Jablonski noted that Lgnnar',ns vision ��r5 Street is very similar tothe [it»'s vision. He noted that the design of the parkway makes a good pedestrian environment. Moving on, Jablonski spoke about the tom/nhqrne portion of the plat, noting that there is sufficient parking to serve the site. He also spoke about Condition #I7, pertaining to the alignment of Streets A and E. He noted that Lennor is opposed to the alignment because they are concerned that this alignment would encourage speeding. Dodson asked about the finances ofthe Common interest Community, Jablonski noted that there would be financial reserves for the structures, landscaping, streets and other elements asdictated by the state of Minnesota. Morreale noted that it looks like the applicant is proposing a nice community, He wanted to know who is responsible to maintain a large portion of the landscaping. Jablonski noted that the open areas would be maintained by the HOA. Horne owners would be responsible tomaintain the trees infront oftheir property. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 Public Hearing opened at 8:35pm. Wayne Prowse, 697 Julep Ave. N., noted that he would like to talk about density and parks. He noted that he does not think that it is appropriate for kids to play in the street. He also noted that he is concerned about the parking facilities in the subdivision. The second issue that he wanted to discuss was the density included in the proposed subdivision. He is concerned that the neighborhood will not be a quality environment. He feels that the neighborhood is too dense. Greg McGrath, 15 St. Ct., asked where the funding is coming from for the utilities. Zuleger noted that the extension is being assessed to the property owners. McGrath asked where the water utility is coming from. Zuleger noted that the temporary solution is from Oakdale. The system will be hooked up to the Lake Elmo City water system once water is extended down Inwood Ave. North. McGrath then inquired about the Landscape Plan of the proposal. He asked who is responsible to ensure performance. Zuleger noted that the City will not release the financial credit for the landscape plan until the plan has been fully executed. Williams asked Staff if there have been any written comments submitted. Klatt stated that there were no other written comments received. Nancy Andert, 697 Julep Ave. N., asked where sewer will be dug to serve the site. Klatt noted that the sewer will be extended from the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Blvd. to Keats Ave. north to a lift station to the north of the subject parcel. Public Hearing closed at 8:48pm Morreale began the discussion by talking about the City's park system. He noted that the Stonegate Park is not large enough to serve all of the homes that are prepared for this area. In addition, he noted that he is concerned about on -street parking. Finally, Morreale noted that he prefers that the trail follow closer to the Lennar subdivision as opposed to closer to the Stonegate neighborhood. Larson asked if the property to the north could collaborate with Lennar on a larger, more traditional park to serve the entire area. Zuleger noted that the Parks Commission made recommendations about adding parkland in the north central area of the Hammes property. Larson asked if the residents of the proposed development could walk to the park in the Hammes neighborhood. Staff confirmed that the park that ultimately serves the Hammes property would be accessible to the residents of the Lennar neighborhood. Dodson asked about transit facilities that may serve the site. Zuleger noted that 5'n Street would be able to be served by local transit service. Johnson stated that transit planning is always being evaluated by Metro Transit when Comprehensive Plans are amended. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 h Haggard addressed the comment made by Mr. Prowae, recommending that the City only allow parking onone side ofthe street. She said that this recommendation isbased on consideration for public safety and children vv8|kinQ and biking inthe neighborhood. K|att noted that the [hx's houe standard is a ZG'vvide street. The City also requires 2 off street parking spaces per home and additional parking for multi -family. Haggard noted that she prefers parking on one side of the street only and no overnight parking. KAorrea|p and Dodson both noted that it is difficult to eliminate on -street parking completely, Currently the City parking ordinance allows a 48 hour maximum. Williams noted that hecould not find any conditions related tothe required permits for watershed district, K|attstated that itispart ofthe engineers report and iscovered under Condition #11. Kreinner noted that he did not agree with the realignment of Streets A and E. He suggested deleting Condition #17. Next, Kreirnernoted that the Landscape Plan utilized Linden Trees, which tend to be negatively affected by Asian Beet|es. Williams commented that species should beconditioned upon sa|tto|eranceandqther considerations. Moving on, Kreirnernoted that 5thStreet may bemoved tothe South. He noted that he has concern about moving the plat forward when this issue is not resolved. K|attnoted that ifthey have torevise their plat, itwould require apublic hearing before the Planning Cornnnbsion. Kre|nneralso asked about the alignment of Street A with the proposed development to the North. Regarding the trail along 5tonegate,Kreinnerwanted toensure that this ismoved further south. Kre|nnernoted that he feels strongly that there should be more parkland in the neighborhood. He suggested having joint park between the Lennar and Hammes, Haggard asked about parking considerations, K|attnoted that the conditions only address the items or requirements of the Subdivision Ordinance, Zoning Code, or Comprehensive Plan that are currently lacking. If the Planning Commission wishes to have a broader discussion about parking, K(attrecornnmended evaluating parking City wide as opposed to subdivision bysubdivision. Zuleger suggested adding to Condition #3 & #4 that the trail in Outlot A be move to the south closer tnthe Savona neighborhood. This vvou/dmeet the spirit ofthe greenbelt buffer agreement. Williams asked fora straw vote. First, he asked if there should be more parkland in the plat. Most of the Commissioners agreed that more parkland would be prudent. 0attpresented information about neighborhood parks vs. regional parkI. He also mentioned that the City was looking for some park dedication money to help fund a future community sports complex in the Village Area that would serve the entire Lake Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 7 8nno community. K\att also stated that the park plan has @ suggested ratio of parkland dedication based onnational standards of1Iacres per lOODresidents. K8/S/P: VV/Uia[ns/Morrea|e, move to postpone consideration of the Plat until the Planning [ornFn\snimn receives consultation regarding the parkland from a member of the Parks Commission, Vote: 5-1, Motion Carried, with Haggard voting no. Larson asked if consideration of the parkland will include collaboration with neighboring properties. Mor,ea|enoted that heisstill concerned about the parking issue. 0attnoted that parking isnot directly addressed \nthe Subdivision Ordinance. Herecommended not making parking regulations subdivision by subdivision. Rather, the City should evaluate parking ordinances City wide, not neighborhood by neighborhood. The Planning Commission had consensus regarding the changes related toother Conditions ofthe Plat: delete #l7and revise #4. Business Item: Zoning Text Amendment — Landscape Requirements. Johnson presented a proposed amendment 10the Zoning Ordinance to add o new section concerning landscaping that will replace three existing sections ofthe code that deal with landscaping requirements. Johnson reviewed the existing sections ofthe ordinance that address landscaping, including the Subdivision, Site Plan Review, and Open Space Preservation (OP)Ordinances. He stated that hisimportant toorganize the landscape requirements into one location in the code, Johnson reviewed the general outline and requirements of the proposed landscape ordinance. K0orrea\e asked if the ordinance requires a rnininnunl caliper measurement of 2.5 inches versus linch. Johnson replied that the new ordinance specifies minimum sizes Vf landscape materials, including trees, in Table 6'1. KReirnerasked about amaximum height requirement onthe Code. Johnson replied that this standard is referencing situation with a berm. He also asked who would be responsible to rep/ace dead trees planted by the developer on private lots, Johnson noted that he would look into other options related to the timing of tree installation. Dodson expressed concern over the approval oflandscaping plans and how adeveloper could be held responsible for this work once their project is completed. Dodson asked if the ordinance could address situations in which a developer prefers to keep more open Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-22-13 trees that are native to Minnesota. Johnson explained that hewould research this issue. Williams commented that the correct plant species for the correct area should be an important consideration of the ordinance. The Commission requested clarification on some of the specific aspects of the draft ordinance, and requested that Staff provide a red -lined version nfthe ordinance with any changes made by Staff prior to further discussion on this matter, Updates and Concerns There will beaspecial Planning Commission meeting onJuly 2nm. The Lennar Development will bebrought back and the staff will make aneffort tPhave Parks Commission Chair Weiss and others there. Council update Council Update —The City Council adopted the Administrative and Enforcement Ordinance atthe July 2ndmeeting with some minor changes. They removed the design and demolition standards until the design standards manual indone. The City Council adopted the fence ordinance at the July 16th meeting with some minor changes regarding solid wall fences up to 6 feet on properties smaller than Y2 acre. The City Council approved plans and specifications for the section 34 utility projectBt the July 16thmeeting, Meeting adjourned at 10:15pm Respectfully submitted, Nick Johnson Planner Lake Elmo Planning ConurninsinD Minutes; 7'22'I3 THE CITY OF -A KE ELMO City mfLake Elmo Planning Commission Meeting Minutes of July 29, 2013 Vice Chairman Reeves called toorder the meeting ofthe Lake Elmo Planning Commission at 7:00 p.m. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT- Reeves, Onrschne,,Dodson, Kre\rner,K8orrea(e; COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Larson, Haggard and Williams STAFF PRESENT: City Planner Johnson, Planning Director K|att Approve Agenda: The Planning Commission accepted the agenda aSpresented. Approve Minutes: July 22, 2013 M/S/P: Kreimer/Doclson, move to accept the minutes of July 22, 2013 as amended; Vote: 5-0. Motion Carried, with Reeves and Dorschner not voting. Kreimer noted two corrections to the minutes, one regarding who is responsible to replace boulevard trees that die before lots are sold, and the other change pertaining to the ratio of the amount of parkland per resident recommended in the park plan. Both were amendments were accepted. Business Item: Preliminary Plot — Lennor Homes K]attbegan his presentation bvpresenting a general outline gfhow the meeting \s to proceed. Heexplained that the Mayor has requested to address the Planning Commission. In addition, per the request by the Planning Commission, the Chairman of the Park Commission, Shane Weis, will present the recommendation of the body, as well as answer any questions by the Planning Commission. Finally, K|att noted that there will be a small amount of time allocated for public comment, as the Public Hearing has already been closed. K|att moved forward tO present the important highlights ofthe Staff Report, Regarding density, he noted that the proposed project is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan. K/att Stated that the Comprehensive Plan utilizes an accepted practice of planning for growth using density ranges. This method is Used due tothe great variation from parcel toparcel due toroads, wetlands, slopes, soils and other reasons that make hitting an exact density figure on every parcel difficu|t. K\att also presented an overview about Lake Elmo Plannina Commission Minutes; 7-29-1.3 2 how the Comprehensive Plan was developed in terms of land uses and buffering as compared to the previous Comprehensive Plan. Moving forward, K|att discussed the aspect of the Staff Report that pertains to parkland dedication. Henoted that when staff makes arecommendation regarding parks, they rely heavily onthe input ofthe Park Commission, Parks staff and the City Administrator, The feedback that Staff received is that it is not critical to install more parkland than is currently being presented in the proposed development, It was stressed that it is important that the City have the ability to maintain whatever parks are dedicated and that they work for the needs ofthe development, Healso presented amap that highlighted all ofthe park facilities inthe Western portion ufthe |'94Corridor. Included inthese facilities are two existing City parks (Ridge and'Stt \ the Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve, existing trails and proposedtrai|s. —�e�;notedhow these facilities relate tothe [it«5 overall park plan. ��. ' `� 0�wra pped otherquest|ons'eo °`'theprevoun Planning Cmrnnn\ss\mn meeting. He discussed theparkinQ issue that vvas' vi |y - �^ raised, describing the amount of property in b ,` ruc±ure and �hront property line. He also describedhow the City arriv- d�tthe 28~ wide road standard, ' + noting that this standard repmesents~ a balance bet ni:.the needsf emergency vehicles, maintenance, parking and traffic t'a'iming and cir'c'u'lation. Related to streets he noted that the Leln,par..proposal meets all e�Uty standards, Klatt also spoke noted that Staff is not recommending that:any special cond it ions be imposed on the Lennar application pe rt - aining to the realignment of the road, Alternatively, Staff is recommending that the=rt"wners continue working on a realignment, and the City will a Ilo r w t,he rea fig to hap en,without,the applicant needing to come back through the plattini:,pMcess:-.1 To wrap the Staff pr0s6n.tation','Klatt highlighted the revised list of conditions. He also liste&dra.ft findings for.the Planning Commission to utilizefor a potential motion. Kreirnerasked about #l9,noting that access was discussed tothe north as well, 0att noted thatKreinler is correct, and the condition should allow for access to the north, K4orrea!e asked what the City requirements were pertaining to parkland. K|att noted that the Subdivision Ordinance requires a1O%land dedication orfee inlieu ofland dedication, He noted that fees are used to acquire additional parkland and install park faci|ities. K0Vrrea|e asked what the pure land dedication for the Lennar proposal would be. K}at1 noted that the land dedication without fees xvoV|d be I1.8 acres. Mor,ea|e noted that 5tonegate Park is not large enough to accommodate all the new residents that will eventually live inthis area. Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 Reeves asked ifthe 6.4proposed acres ofpark include the other open space areas included in the proposed plat. Kbtt noted that the other areas are not counted towards paddand. These areas also serve as storm water retention. As afollow up, Dodson asked which out|ots are owned by the City vs. the HOA. K!ott highlighted a list within the plat that notes all ofthe ownership ofthe various owt|ots. Reeves asked ifthe HDA would own the oUt|ots shown in the tovvnhorne area. Klatt confirmed that the areas around the tovvnhonnesare HOAowned, DuFsrhnerasked if trails are included asparkland dedication. Klatt confirmed that linear parks will only beaccepted ifthe developer builds the trails. Reeves asked ifthe City iscreating achallenge ofmeebngtheKAOUwith the Metropolitan Council ifthe City continues toaccg �deve)opnlentthatisunderthe minimum thresholds. K|attnoted that the Cli ' tyhastocont)nuetomonitor the nurnb9rs guided bvthe M{}Uagainst platted lots, |n`ddh thaithere are 5ornebnoes unique circumstances onsites that aren't 'always factored insuch as'-- -rs,porks, storm water ponds, etc. � 'El ��|kePearson, 28OSUshpnAve��.��&OayurofLake ' n»",�pokeaboutthehisturyofth� /'94Corridor planning effort. He niot6dthat the plan balanced protection Ofthe existing neighborhoods, orderly growth of the,,comni unity, reasonable use to develop the land, and meeting the requirements of the Met Countil..'He commended the Planning Commission's efforts.in the',Iong range planning,,process, as well as the review of the plat. He indicated'fhat the planning for grow—th 4n the 1-94 Corridor has been a long and extensive process,'aacl,it is important to kee�p.:rnoving the process forward. 7thSt.N.;,the Chairman of the'Park Commission, spoke to the Shane Weis., S4831,2 Planning Commission, _Hen that the Park Connnn\ssionsview Vnnew development would be tohave onetentra{open area, which Lennardoes. This plan would be acceptab\etothe Park Commission' Dorschne[ asked the Chairman if there are any studies done to indicate the current level of park use. VV l notedthatn|ake Brno's parkland to citizen ratio )svery high, which also means that maintenance /s,veryhigh. The Park Commission needs tostrike aba|ance between nnaintenance an'quality of life with parkland. Dorschner noted that the maintenance ofthese parks must beconsidered. The City must ensure that vvehave the ability tomaintain the parks well. This plan factors inboth the needs ofthe future residents Vfthe development and the cost Ofmaintenance. The City needs to consider the resources required for park maintenance. Krgirn2rosked ifany ofthe park funds would b2used for abroader facility for the cornrnunity. Weis noted that the funds would gointo the general parkland dedication fund. The specific use for those funds would bedetermined atafuture time. Johnson Lake FImo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 4 stated that the Village land use plan does call for a community recreational facility which will guide the use ofsome 0fthese funds. K4ornea|easked ifthe amount ofparkland, particularly for the western portion ofthe neighborhood, isacceptable bJthe Park Commission. Weis stated that the Park Commission is comfortable with the current park as it is a central park and they factored inthe maintenance. K8orrea|estated hefeels that the proposed park \snot large enough for this many people and they should be required to put in the full size. Johnson stated that the City has the flexibility to accept in lieu of funds when it seems appropriate and it has been common practice inthis city )A [he OP developments and in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area, Dodsonk City standard requires a sidewalk on one sid:e of the street for the'",yery purpose of maintaining proper accessibility. In aclditi6on,, he notes that the recent, results from the Park Survey reveal that more residents are concerned about the maintenance of the existing parks on the system, Specifically, Klatt noted that -the City has to 66',,ipreparecl to maintain the trail system that islconstructed in additionAo maintaining existing and new parks. Weis also noted that there becentral parkplanned for the Hammes Estates development, which was recently rev�ume~ /��heSketc`" aO|eve|bvtheP|anning , ^ Commission and Park -Commission. Reeves asked fotm 'ore ificfr'om�ike ' Park survey. Weis stated that, atthis time, they have not,:ana|yzedthedata,but will bedoing so attheir next meeting. ' Dorsch suedL]ftk edwere for use bvthe residents that |{ the Uev | or�t�heyare f6r1u�e of any resident ofthe City, Weis stated that�nyded|catedPa��|and|s a.City park an 'dcan bEused byanyone. ' ` Reeves ask � Weis if he felt the City parks were underutilized, properly utilized, or over utilized. VV6bnoted that the. .Park Commission currently believes that the City parks are underutilized, Weis asked K|attabout 1hetVtlots. Klatt explained that there might be space available in the multi -family area for a tot lot. Joe Jablonski, LennorHomes, noted that Lennarhas built homes all over the Twin Cities and across the country. He shared his experiences pertaining to park land in the context ofthe neighborhoods Lennorhas platted and built. Henoted that small neighborhood parks have been very successful in addressing the needs of families with young children. He noted that more programmed parks with team sports require much greater amounts of park|and. Moving forward, Jablonski presented two concepts of the central park of Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 5 the Savona plat. These concepts are intended hzillustrate how the proposed park space can beutilized. Reeves opened the forum for brief public comment. Henoted that there were written comments submitted by Commissioners Williams and Larson that the Commissioners reviewed. Susan Dunn, 11018 Upper 33"' St., asked the Planning Commission to consider the City's "Commitment tothe [brnmunity". She also noted that many people have worked hard to preserve land in the City. Dunn noted that this is the f1rztinne that she has seen the Savona |proposal, h felt overwhelmed b of development. She stated that there should be additional parkiandt6-§erive the young families that will locate inthe neighborhood. |naddition, Dunn as'd`heP'nnin8[onlnnissionto consider the EAW and surface water managernOpt plan of thee\nprnent. ChadieDevngrepreoentstheovvnersofthe`LouisDarn<aniTrustandTinnMontgonnery parcel. Devine was complimentary ofLenn .',sta1\n8thattheyhavebeemgood towork with in the development r c He noted that -'he property owners he,e) resents as well as the development group he is part of, wish t6realign the 5 Streetminor collector road furthertothe south, He6'otecl that the*Cit,y has It -.@ken a hands off approach thus far. He is asking that the Ci-tylacilitate bringing parties to the table to bring resolution to the,ali er gnment of th 7minor co-ROctor road. -,He is asking on behalf of the property ownersthat,th.e:resolution'.df the.:5,,.s'tree,a.1ignm6nt be an additional condition of pfat.A� p.proval. He� ' stated thai'4ihe. supports the'Lennar neighborhood, but needs to see realignment of the'collector road. VVayn �O97j |gp�4u�JNnoted that ifthedevelopment is11Zwcres than theCity should require the full parkland dedication. He also cited a Pioneer Press article Reeves opened up discussi-on'to the Planning Commission. K4orreale stated that he feels that the Savona plat will set the bar for future sew/2red development. Hestated that ifthe Planning Commission allows this development tV move forward, than all ofthe future developments will follow the precedent. Reeves asked K4orrea|e ifhethought any future developments are impacted by the parks around it. K4orreo|e stated that hefeels that parks are a key thing that should not be Kreirnernoted that it was stated that Lake Elmo already has an overabundance ofparks. However, hestated that Lake Elmo has never had high density before, For this reason, Lake Elmo Planning Commission K4ioutes;7'29'l3 6 Kreinoernoted that now isnot the time topull back onparkland, He stated that there should bemore parks for the amount Ofresidents. Dorschnernoted that in an ideal world, everyone's property would back Vpto a park, Heshared that hevisited StoneOatePark last week. Henoted that the park isnot \n great use. He notes that he would prefer to use the park system for trails that connect people toparkland and allow for alternative transportation. He stated that he respects other perspectives on parkland, but prefers additional t[ailS. Dodson asked Staff about the comments bvMr. Devine pertaining tothe alignment of m ' 5 Street. |naddition, heasked ifthere \sany planned j. ro«ernentorbridDefpr crossing Keats Ave ur loth Street. 0attnoted that agradeseparatedtrail would be problematic on Keats Ave. He noted that a grade / '/ratedtcaUvvou|dbeid8a(but costly,Related m S Street, Klattexplained the -Staff positionthat the City does not want to take a position between a matter ofnegotiation betweenAhree active land owners. Reeves asked if it would be practical, for the City to impose some type of time frame to move negotiations pertaining to the -a"1ignment,of the collector�road forward. Klatt noted that the 5th Street realignment will beconsjd ere'd if it is brought'forward, but we are dealing with a lot of 6.6tertainties. ` . ' Oorschne, stated that he feels it is the City^s.responsibilityto encourage resolution of the alignment of 5 th Street. He stated that Lenharr should have:to work to resolve the issue so it is not a Win'n-er take.all result, Dodson stated that he is on thef2nce regandin8the parks issVe, In addition, he does not ' share Dum�fee ling that^ osin0acnnditalig nment m Street isthe fair way�o,, roach it, K8ornea|estated that heisconcerned abouttheannountofparkspace. Hefeels that the City has set the land requirement at1O96. In addition, if we accept less for this plat, it will h a ppen for the plats moving forward, Reeves noted thatheshares ' ecn|cernabouta|lovvingforenoushp|ocesfo,tornUies of kids to play. Nevecthe\e ` he is sensitive to the recommendation and thoughts of the Park Commission, ]ohosonstated that the City needs tothink inbroader terms ofthe parks system Vs. individual plans. Johnson stated the City has the statutory authority to take 1096 park dedication in any combination of land and fee, depending on the circumstances and would not besetting any precedent from one plan to another. Mor,ealestated that he disagrees with the interpretation of Planner Johnson in terms of a bar being set for parkland for every park coming forward, Klatt noted that the park plan does not provide substantive guidance in how to program neighborhood parks. Also, there is not significant push from the Parks Commission to Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 7 recommend addition& parkland for this plat. He encourages the Planning Commission to dialogue with the Park Commission on future plats. Dorschner stated that the Park Commission was represented, and it is not the place of the Planning Commission to questions their recommendation. M/S/P: Dodson/Dorschner, move to recommend approval of the Savona Preliminary Plat with the revised Condition #19, Vote: 3-2. Motion Carried, with Kreimer and Morreale voting no. Updates and Concerns Council update — None Staff update — Planning Commission meetings upcoming on August 12 and 26. Commission Concerns — Dorschner asked if the future residents will be notified pertaining to potential nuisances in the area, including the mining operation and gun range within close proximity. Klatt noted that he will do some research to see how this will be addressed. Meeting adjourned at 9:53pm Respectfully submitted, Nick Johnson Planner Lake Elmo Planning Commission Minutes; 7-29-13 Alan Dale [ad letilec .cpm] Friday, July 20.2O131:14PM Kyle K|att;Nick Johnson; Dean Zu|eger s0eve.aoh@|enna,.00m RE: Sonoma per plat - 5th Sheet Kyle, Vyesupport Lennar intheir desire tokeep S" Street aslocated onthe Lennar Preliminary Plat, | have exchanged emai|s with the AmahsGroup about moving 5m Street to the South. This move vvoo|d relocate about J acres of valuable high density land to the Lennar parcel north ofS" Street. This additional acreage is ofmarginal value to Lennar and not necessary for Lennar. I have asked Amaris to reimburse us for this lost 2 acres if the road is moved south. My understanding from Amaris's last email is that they were not willing to pay for this acreage. We remain open to discussions with Amahs and Lennar and if something can be worked out we can make the correction before the final plat is recorded, Our interest is to be reasonably compensated for the lost acreage, Alan Dale Stonehenge USA S0O7Culligan Way Minnetonka, N\N55345 0:952.288.2201 C�812.71B.3783 ede|eCcDnVznehenge-usa.com vwxxw.a$nnehenoe'una.com From: Steven Ach Fnln)Ko:Steve^4ch6c0Lennar.con1 Sent; Tuesday, ]u|vOZ, 20134:07PM To: Kyle K|att Cc: Alan Dale; Joe Jablonski Subject: Sonoma per plat - 5th Street Kyle itsounds like Alain Dale needs to work out some details with the buyers of the Montgomery property before heagrees tomoving 5th Street to the south. Given the short amount oftime wchave before the Planning Commission meeting I think for your review of our preliminary plat lets assume 5d)Strnetxri/l not be moving, Lennar wants to proceed with the plat as submitted. If you want to discuss please call me Tbmoka Sent fronocuydPad Steve Aob [and Acquisition Manager Members ofthe Planning Commission, | regret |amunable 10 attend tonight's meeting, but |omunatrip planned long before this special meedngwasscheduhed.However,\cannmtstupth|nNngabuuAtheLennaruubdivisionn,sinxeit is our first large, sewered subdivision, and our decisions about it may well influence our decisions about the future sewered subdivisions onthe horizon. For comparison, we can look atsimilar subdivisions innearby cities, such asLennar's K8iUbrooknear 96and 151nStillwater. As we consider the developments in our City, we will probably make mistakes along the way, but that is the nature nfthe process ofcreating our unique City ofLake Elmo. The following are my own thoughts and opinions and are offered for your consideration. l. Overall, the Lennar subdivision appears to be an acceptable one, based on our current regulations, with a couple of concerns, Z. The Lennar and Hammes subdivisions will have over 450 homes, which means well over 1000 people. 3. The Lennar plat is about Xmile north/south and about 2/3 mile east/west, The Hammes plat is about Y4xXmi|e. Lake Elmo has a stated policy of having "pedestrian friendly" developments. In mymind this means a "destination" park (as opposed to a trail) within 1/z mile of any home. I believe the Stonegate Park was located where itisinorder toserve additional development tnthe west. 4. The Lennar plat has a nice trail system. It has one, nice shady park: great for a couple of picnic tables, atot lot, maybe a half -court basketball area. But there is no open field for sports activities, like baseball, soccer, football, flying kite, etc, These could be accommodated by a simple, relatively level, open field with minimal equipment, although it might be nice to have a backstop and a 1-2 table shade pavilion at some point in the future. Such a field would not be a big maintenance burden: for example, there would be no need for a manicured baseball infield, atleast atthe start. S. For the Lennar subdivision, the City should require in addition the dedication of about 2 acres for an open park, imagining some future layout similar to the active area of Reid Park. The location should be within % m\ka of all homes. Certainly, a site straddling the border between the Lennar and Hammes subdivisions, and serving both, should beconsidered. 6. Our laws allow the City to require up to 18%ofthe )and in a new subdivision to be dedicated for perks. Of course, the developer will object to this amount. But once the land is developed with homes, it is practically impossible to recover it for a park. Therefore, we should acquire the land when we can, even if it is not developed for a park immediately, The City can sell off parkland later, if desired, but it realistically cannot buy it back once developed, without expensive and messy condemnation proceedings. 7. 1 am also concerned with the County's comments about traffic impacts along Keats Ave, for both Lennar and Hammes plats. Is a berm unrealistic? Would a solid fence or wall be feasible? Is there some other mitigation possible? Q. 1 am also concerned about the total impervious surface coverage (over 50% ?) and storm water runoff. Is the proposed storm water management system adequate for the expected runoff volume? I have asked the City Engineer for his comments. Respectfully submitted by Todd Williams Rolf Larson Monday, July 2A,2O131O:04AM Nick Johnaon�Kyle K|att Rolf Larson Unable 0oattend 7CZQmeeting with notes My wife's father died last Friday evening. Visitation is tonight @ Bradshaw' The funeral will be tomorrow morning in Stillwater. I also have a couple comments on this week's meeting notes: 1\ As Lennar is getting to set "the bar" for future developments by being the first development in the 94 corridor, so are we are also setting "the bar" for development expectations. Adequate open area for child activities and parental supervision need to be clear expectations. Z) These new housing developments will have many children. They will tend to have large homes on smaller lots. Children need to have open ground for play. If we don't want them playing in the streets' they need to have play areas and open space for actives activity. 3) I really like the trails Lennar is offering in their plan. 4) Buffer existing developments such as Stonegate that were developed under different models (larger yards, more open space). They have legitimate expectations that need to be protected by open space and appropriate buffering! I like both park models projected in this week's packet but feel that the first Outlot F model with; a) open space; b) play sets; and c\a shaded seating area for parents to be with their children as they play (shade, picnic tables (or gazebo) and a grill is most appropriate for this development because of the number of children who will be moving into these new homes. Sorry I will be missing tonight's meeting. I am so pleased with our decision to see to these CONCEPT SKETcH PLAN. 07-26-2013 20121161 SAVONA LAKE ELMO, MN CONCEPT SKETCH PLAN ,v 'AO 07-26-2013 20121161 IV 411,011/11.. SAVONA LAKE ELMO, MN n 2013Westwood l'irofessiccal Service.% loc. Typical Lot Detail 1 111 4011 1,1171711;9'ostrrent I Selbatl, 1 69 97-799son 9' - 1otot L77,979ser --- A fi£, STREET 0704150755*5601111, '1151*05119. 195617,1,007458544 0007477 152-...0 1 f EXCEPTION OUTLOT D 94104017 R= r000 00 L=272.4J r, '3707 CH=271.59 ' CBPN68°47'18"Vi 'PI 5TA=41+27,29 tor • otost tty 777 ...ay 11 ...dr timmed LAND scerineterr Craig W. Mane, ALS 06/14/13 LicenaNO 23021 / __,[1r_. --II[ 1 4„:078,7,11["4:11)["' OUTLOT Arf Rieriticaa iliffrof C,fty 074174/f11 ..ff 0*4 Off, C.f.,. 0,/`4,13 7 8 PARRAREENWA 9 [ XI [ [1, - Iltototate (dodo& Mime goeidi Onddrig..iiitZdtria 5 ZL I kt! i r 5 41' t '11798 a Development Data: gqicokito 5111 alr04111- 59591t Coady 9e9995170 Mao Far769- Resripatpt 500000 44 8907Car 4a905tor 190473 (OM .6115511 ROW - ..97591e Forn/y Polio, "5 17 57" Ill ""5 5 5"- 517,55517,59 7 7 5" mat. Camay Potato I I I 1 I 111 , Oottot It itL .1 Path DrAialtisso " -;;','n.; 74' ;,5'oc 111- "Ti- (0,881r A *5 6. pasaro 6) I 2 I 4 5 6 [ "8-1 '9[ vow PrOta 0450-Sitar& 1 ' I (99.106't 8,159. Pa505a, ataer woo OCC,S) _J L „!, i L 5 [',1' 4 3 2 [ 1 ! o off.1 4 r - - —9 -I - 5,4 Ir_ rr_ - - ; I ff.f ff 5 J Tr 51! 9 4 R=820,00 (,=978,J0 T=555,82 CH= 921. 30 .0=55°21'2J" C8,4584°50 .7'W Pi 57A=29+04.15 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Miruanesota, 55446 OT E -4" 41 75 14 OUTLOT r 5 r_ ' 3 5 -5' 0947717.9 (1o) velopnient Notes 5:Oottt Family ClOott Sperir v71a74 6, a, s' 5 11) 44911-055s7y Op, Spoo (Outlaw- 1, .4 0/ 0. ott proate 970517 & raswetys) 60L0euee0oLe0e; 60 r4'17/550 (010110 (net ROW, Tv% & 0 Spot; 61 71- at 979,77-1',5977 ae7 aaea (050 0019i01 085 at R7W)1872 Coll 48 Hours before digging 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Allioncn 1816 as 9151 cr. 10 at at. 700101 - 120 oc 5,01 va 191 or 411 0' ofvf 140 deep tpoltaii 75' wee / 140' lop 16p5a9 Pratasati randr 179975" ROW Toseasott. Back -Rat* 7aer901770,, 6 4 at 2579- at, 16.71 css 10.01 a, 188 1059 Da lots 1.6 1017 122 horel 44 Stoles 78 aorta armee Praoaseri Hoopes 577 91671e0 Ovenal arose °merit, -Sago 80er17 Crass Deoorp sisaW Food, Gross Droop Overeet Net Drasit, 55,49/0 Family Croat, Dersoty 4127 Fasory 447 Soma), 2, 76 95/ac (averad) 2 05 us/at 585 1J n/, 582 un8110 (averoa) 299 u5/777 5. 70 a 5/. Front Seib -oak 25" .51-tre Setbacks (see nate &Rom) 75i/75i 00i 1,90 Safe 5oebr.k (Corm Laid) 15" 000 Sertacr 271 Warman tot Area: 9,997 of kproto area 9,1751 Proaased 95.111-Fart6y Qa-rmgarnessi 5t5644ree 51117 ar. der Unit Rrparad 500 are, Po 9519 4,000 sr PraWd791 Cosa 69e area pa- 0511 7,425 lautarviaaa Cart00a8 5699979n MsperVour Ces,ron,r 50X Proptc,e, onaerroas Corrapa 418 °two Spate 795659956,111718 9940r0110 00011 SOare 500 st Proidad Op, Satre Per 6a9. 1570 11 (Naos 7 ,7 6, 1 ft.. p.a. stoats& rows / r22) Pr000sAtt Setborhs 05147'50251s1. Otarisal Rs;.v. 25 K40rs Wo, 50' to Opourea aft, Street Cotoot, 40 to 57757,59es atiatent Property: 401 Setaratoa &Warm to 89 ant 25try ArNste Reop Street Width 24 107 (00) 77' MO, 24 17991aa 149, Otto setback tt aromas sate (.70 2007," arioopoe1 area, Woking posore, a 25 per a5A ad)9r Nem, Use 05,9ersh5 0a11,71 A Coorway/aork aro Catlat 5 Esint/Opeo apata OSA Outiat C P.driapos Spate ato CuBot 0 Pood/Dasso Space air (93007 E Pana/Opea Saco, C,,Y Soffat 7" Park CM, Ostlal G COO/ Spate ROA asalat Oata Spate- Mad artlat 1 Pcaa/Oper Spo‘An C.tv nunnr F CP. 40. HOW 877199 0 Open Spool' 904 0911,71 9975P(777 0rt19/ M Folare Derelapotet Others 1 ALL LOT 044EN510N5 ARE ROUNDED ro 50E NEAREST 2 ALL A56E45 ARE ROL;NDEO TO THE NEAREST 50UARE F005 STREET NAVES ARE SUBJEC T TO APPROVAL BY THE cArr 4 DRAINAGE AND UTILITY EASEMENTS SHALL BE PROWDED 45 RECLAREC DRAINACE ANO 0111.17-5 EASEMENTS 01114 BE P.ROVIDED OVER .ALL PUBLIC U171117E8 BLANKE r 0RA1NA0E AND UTILITY EASEMENTS OVER THE EN71RE- 05T10r TO BE PROVIDED ON FoNAL PL4 T FOR ALL CR OUTLOT A THROUGH OUTLOT L SIRES/ WICINS SNOWY ARE l'iROM BACK 0- CURB TO BA(K Os C.URB 6 5,0E SETBACKS OF 75' & (15i TOTAL) REPRESENTS THE A'vERAOE OF COOE REOULREO 15' (7S' TOTAL) SETBACKS NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona Tue. Elmo, Minnesota Sire 416 at 1 5,3 at. 555 as 557 oO 4 95 as' 199 a: 2.51 oc. 0.77 an 1..7 tt 252 ac. 581 ass 1152 at 1 407' Date 03/28/13 Sheet 8 OP 23 Preliminary Site Plan 72013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc, Coll 48 Hours before digging' 811 or calt811.com Common Ground Alliance OtM.OT B I 55:.'55__711: 5-'27 751,77 _ „„ i1=5J, ,„ • ',II T;J:55 Top 554 r 5 , 5, 2 !' 3 r 4 1. 5 6 7 r 8 9 5 --'- . Er r 1 :i 1 8 ' 7 7!d 6 .'', ' 5 1; 4 3 ;, 2 'r I . L I , 4, t, ,tt 3.. .., 2 ,,,,,, .1 t,. 0,5, ..r 4-',' ,5 ,t, 5 11 .1 , 1 9 LI r , ,, ,.i I ,...a.',.ti ..,--- -. - .555.11,55 0811 WnitinailtititinnitinittilliSinnitint, Eden, Prninn.frinl 962-1,W-51. VAX 1,62-937-5.2.2 bonny en./ e6•I Mir F. —4-5404 ann., sirtarAirlon a the I nag • nnly titter an 5miii 00 blitmooten. 0.14 W. Mom, wiww‘wereeocRip.oien Dan 06 /14/13 Liam. SIch. 23621 R=1000,00 1.,383.40 T=183 7J CI-1,361, 40 4=20°4977- Ca. 561004'14W PI 5 rA = e+ 2Z 34 OUTLOTM int Rerybkess - ciiVio:5155,54 0,0/.14/11 94e500 nee tity Croinnanti, 01/141/1-1 osorgh4 .5.ro trintnnit / Mit OUTLOT H 4 {',550,4 1 1 \OUTLOT I n1747%). R-820.00 L'289J8 F-146,21 CH5,287.88 d= 20°1310" C8= 561°2217'W P1 ST4=11.1-7544 0 Cbeckeek DM/7x _C',??0.1[ hr/44,4 Prepared for 3 41- OUTLOT C 0 R=820.00 L=554.41 r=28827 CH=543.97 LI-38°44'18" C8=570°3751W P1 .51.45- 1-22.44 ITLOT K Yr- Lennar Corporation 1630 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mirummota, 55446 OT L itintt 5,05,0413,5e+P'S 8/ ,655Rl (Si 0 85504011 Typical Lot Detail 2 55 75' Oto'rooggt litOtty Ec4e51554 toe 100 5,T2 - tot 0,erroto5 T • Lot 1,5enbot t ot Afro F 65 /75' STREET NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona lake Elino, Minnesota ow= 03/28/13 Sheet 9 of 23 Preliminary Site Plan 02013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc. Preliminary Plans 0 Pia Uti 0 Site, Grading, Erosion Control ies and Landscape Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota Prepared for: Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Contact: Steve Ach Phone: 952-249-3033 Prepared by: Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Ana g p.m Drive Edon Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 952 937-5-15i) FAX 952 937-5822 TOLLPREE 1-888 937-6150 Westwood Project number: 0000565.00 Cantact Ryan (..4 I-301T1 Sheet Number Sheet Title 1 Cover 2 Site Context 3 Existing Conditions 4 Existing Conditions 5 Existing Conditions 6 Preliminary Plat Plan 7 Preliminary Plat Plan 8 Preliminary Site Plan 9 Preliminary Site Plan 10 Preliminary Site Plan 11 Preliminary Grading, Drainage 12 Preliminary Grading, Drainage 13 Preliminary Utility Pion 14 Preliminory 'Utility Plan 15 Details 16 Detoils 17 Details 18 Preliminory Street Profiles 19 Preliminary Street Profiles 20 Preliminary Street Profiles 21 Preliminary Street Profiles 22 Preliminary Landscape Plan 23 Preliminary Landscape Plon Sheet List Table Town Home Areo & Erosion Control Plan & Erosion Control Plon JUk 14 Vicinity Map (Not lc Scoie) NO, DATE REVISION 1 05/17/13 Review Per City Comments 2 06/14/13 Review Per City Comments NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Preliminary Plans for Plat, Site, Grading, Erosion Control, Utilities and Landscape for Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota ELME REGIONAL PARK RESERL,G SHEETS I All All Date03/28/13 Sheet 1 of 23 EDII2,1ACNN'0 KKA c 2013 Weslwood Prof essfonol 5erreces, Inc Coll 45 Hours before digging- 811 or co11811.com Cornrnon Ground Alliance GUIDED Fi4MUBC GUIDED COMMERCIAL Waweasti Profeasionst 44rovlas, 7644 kentton htt Ed. hthoc tted i 1 1 / 1 / tBTONEGATE / t \ SUBDMS1ON k r 1 \ / 1 \ / GUIDED R3/LDR .•' jJ i / / / / to, 7-1 , / "..\, / '',...\ / / L_S / / / / / ,, / ,/ ,/' / 171 1-4JOSON 81-VID MAK NOWAY 94 - I hooter oath, thoh ht. hr. hrehetad 1. at hotter to, - &no hed that I am a thtly keno. LAND SUIthIrthh =hex the law* t the Stew at Whew. - 05/17/t3 ,evet, ra, t, Oallif13 Na-05C47,14,i5 Desbaseti Cluseirme, RUB p4104,nz 4114 ttemni taxwtax Wave __, Prepared for. A z GUIDED R4MUC GUIDED NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 260400 Cpc; 21021161000C, dr,q per 03/28/13 Sheet 2 OF 23 PHONE 462-03,6,50 rAtt 352 7a3-Sen fhttI. 140310355172 twehrwsinthxdphohnn Credg W. Mar,., RLS 00/14/13 23021 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mirumeseta, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota Site Context L if 44 22 52 19 017 z or co n 3 - 3 4. go 01 1 o g 3101 0 rr) 0 z 7c1 ; 0 741) 3402921130001 Owner' inAA04 WiLIJ4A.f (AL 001 8" Concrete lE=.984.01 3.3,4 7<"r000rra per Boon 277 a,33ended rly 120 end 70,, NC 3 12' Concrete lE=943 86 12" Concrete 1E3-.943 88 Storm Sewer C01,1.-6414, tSS,On Et) 0,4,40. EP,ndS, $4 ago, 55.3- 254, 44c4 7 5799 5752 Golf 11no Ron9e Fence/Nel - S 2 ---- Wept 44, of the 1lortheo$1 Quolt r of ht: Souleeuet Duortor of Sec 34r-wo, 29, P.ge. 21 EXISTIN irrigotton Box B-14 trr.pat.or Por -4\ Pond 874 Swth Ire ol the 44.)41heoz,,t Cuorter of the S1outheo51 Orr orler cf Sec 34, Twr, 29, Rge 21 .! PIC 340292 I 4400'05 °Anon CE3f TER 7 PIO 34029214 4 4 Owner ERER 144 ‘4414 :EP EaSt loe of the Wes! 14o!f of the Southec4I Coortec of See. 34, Two, " Concrete lE=983,27 Alshno Bodd,ng g I I North line or 4A:on,4so1e Uerartrav,t I i af 1,,,,7ortokan Pight of 4,!! Way Ptnl No 62-4.3 North tine of the 4439ht o, Way of Trunk H,ghwoy 12 Der lino' Certificate 0 Book 222 of 0,,,cs, Fog- 11 Sooll, Il,, f thc: Southeast Quortc., of Sec 34, To,p 29, Rye 21 4-- 90114 oP Inc Righl of Way <31 14l9hrf0y 12. Per Dc,d7. recc”ded Book 102 or Dee04, pcge 526 nod Book 0 of Deeoe, Page 206 29, Rge 21 S -9 ' Pond N3., 1011 (--- - Exrsting Shea i4.43-er 24 Sept. Systen, ond !Do/1/id Ea3e19erri por 0o, No 322.8914 / 224 3):JdOS 3136.74VO / 2, 10 EXISTING TREE Pond MS. t Inoof Womngton Covnty Highway Right of Way Plot No 48-19B 7' EXISTING EVE GREEN TING -10 LA DSCAPE BERM- 10 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY BIT TR,AIL. - ,r,a.41ton Box / BIT. PAVEMENT / , --41.3'ounci! 41cit - 651 419 46894 // / Ponding ,no; Droinoge Eoserrwol per Dog ,Jo. 3248915 0/0 .3402921440009 (41,1,4, 07.4 PROPES TIES 94 LAUD P AP 4445P 11t3 of the Soulhe-ast Quart, of Sec, 34, Two 234 Rae 21 !!'.3 - / / 1 / 7 0 (P) Qt. M rf:.,-2 0 1,1 ?z ''?., '',,, (S) SS 12 1- e Y .-c,- IS N :,..-, [3 .--.:i: ) <1 a Ts CD i 1 L!/: '--", s;„ r , /. i § 's FA S S ;-r S c2,-" t- i,°: r-,:2 '0"?,:r -`'..:-; r-'2 ' & X ,, T, '''7,1'' s $. '.-, -A ---; if-- I 1-,'3 .,: .',71 '-,' ., s , , s, ,-;-:, i '4' r.,-'' , iir 1 :' ',, SI 29 ?/ ''.' - Found W0011,441041 County kio,urnent, E431 13o9rle, Corner of Sec 3wo 29, Rye 21 520 09'J 1 ?,1 - jEX POND !OUTLET EL,942.0 ;H1ht.946 9 FES RCP(concrelre) IE=942 00 RE--948.00 IEr-935 61 54- FES RCP(concrete IE-,935 00 roJod Vol-, Pipe ..v.th 3 tn171,Aluminun- Cap 1,-7 D 7 .r2 27 01 27 23 S =I' 41 01 10 1/1 18 z 0 NISNOD Nal ION z "4 1 2 PO 3402921240076 Own,' G04E dENNIFER 13 3, I 1 I I I i I I I I 011 I I 1 HUDSON BL VD ..... „ , • —EXISTING WOODED FENCE LINE - We,1 fine of the Wes! half of the SeutheaM Quarter of S'c 34, Twp 29. fIgo 21 -Wethoe of Porrei 2 of North Amer,con Innof Once Compooy Con‘milment Numner .1101352- 12 -1136,3M1 rt V EXISTING OAK TREES —PROPOSED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 'South Hoe of Porno' 2 of North Amer.00n 334le Insuronne Company Corornitolent Number 40852 -12-11361%11 -19 „- North une of Parcel 213 1.1331,,,,ot0 Deportment /1 of TronsporIallon Right of 'rkay Plot No EvsOng ence Properly hoe -,- Norfh One of ihn SOefteost Quarter cl Ser.' 34, fv,p, 29, Roe 21 n, 1 LOCATIONS PARCEL 2 / / / / / / 60 OU foot in.cle ff,ght of ingress nod EgreL-F, f;ef Finol 1:eft:I/cote in Book 220 of Deeds, Page 11 36' WIDE BITUMINOUS 5 - 8 01'2 /I -A I I 2` MOE GRAVEL .."411EE "E,„ A.47`,00 1r. "IT OF 443T 2 — ,I4023210001 Owner HAWES 1I7uL/2144 7 Frit, ..... ...... ----- North no of Pared 2 of North Aronocon ftfle Insturon;e Company Comnrottrent Number 40802-12-1136314 Ennt line of the 133e51 tiolf of the lhe(19, Quarter of Set, 34, Twn 29. Rge 7, EfrA line of Pareol 2 of North Amencan 110 in,U,T0e (...0,14p04?. Cororn,tment Nornber 40W-12-11383V' 13' 3/ zz--EXISTING CONTOURS Exuntrno Concrete Foundation \ \ 3434 \ 3434 \ \ Exist og Concroto Foundallor \ Exfshog 820'1010 0' Burdotno, northwest corner ,' 1644 feet norloeny of property One F',1und WoshIngton Cconty Cost Iron kfon,iroent, South 0,0,114 Corner of Sec. 34, Top 29, Rge 21 M4 r :3 28 3 E E A A ? 3 34 OV3K,LIAG tt 3140o North line of he RIght of Way of Trunk FUghwor 12 500 1' no Cert1k.dte lo Book 220 ol Deeds, Poor 11 &') E 53 53 X - " 2 A 1:11 58-20 E/wAing Fence I5F6 16" Metal 1E--988.13 60.00 foot wide Right of Ingre.is and Egress per rinal Cerluhcate Sook 220 of Deeds. Page 11 Li 6.„ -4 4 34,4-33 (r.). EXISTING TREE / Lt 33 ----- .34029214.2100a2 1 Owm, TUSMAN 1 FRAM, Y AIIIANCE 60 00 !,101 kUght of log'".” and Egress per Fir, Cerlifirote 3333 Book 220 of Deea$, rage 11 ,! 3: R 5. -Z. i f ,i A -A., .,ii •':,1 1 01 01 3333 33, 01 Dui 'sawuas louo!ssajo.id poomisam 00221 00 C' 217 n Co 0 ci g. 3 4' o 0 or, -11 0 2 2 9_ ,7 > g P! 3 '°0 z 0 0 5. I Jth line et trot p,ot of _.onegoto 2nd Aditt,.r4029 2124C008 nm HRIS rOPHEI- A PI 402921.7.10C! 4 PD 5402.92124 DC;(7 7 C1\ K 11..EE & K.4 rt. EEN Hi152 1 wncr .IAPOS JOSFPH Owner ROSSCW 010418 '7— -V 1010 3402.92 ?3270(1 Or,n, 0,1111.40 CCU'S a5 T 1,1.1 Tr', 0 C MCNTGOME,9Y 011 t, , A C, /05 V 2 0 J4029,21,150004 On,r;er LAMPE F 1SC Controlled Access( lypOl 50,0,.) foot w,de Right hi Ingress and C.ort,n r.mr Fforll - CutifiL-olc in Book 220 of Dek..mis, Pug, 11 20 26 found ii:oppec Irr,,h Pipe, tnsc No 12294 West hhe of Parcel 1 re,1 Mtle Insuranoo Company Go_ t4urnbc, 40852 -12--11.63121 - Went line af the E40 Hal of tho Soulhwest C.?“=„Ntc, or SP,: 34, rem. 29. Rqe 21 Drainfieid Cleanont; -2, PID 14029224001 f,..4,Per LON!: 45 A Mooth hne 01 Parcel 29 Dr StOto / Right of \Noy Plot No. C o, 12 Ermting Fence 1 60 feet south Property boo Lcoot,'n r giPehne 5caled I ram HP P:r,,hnesNorth fmnerroM)inc 105/ 5402. I'? J4 0004 Own f.r GA LL (1..1 .53500 E,05ti,g Cohcreth Steps -„ to 131,140g Entrance , I I tp, 9 aur+chr -a, 11rg Budding 4 20 feet +vont of property lino \ ; . I I ,j,J 01 t 'Ai 12 ttl, tt,r 9 ,4 M m p. 2 A e!-*. 24 16 24' Meta lE=994-38 10 10 10 00 ;! I iott, BI TUMINOLI PAVEMENT - 24Metal IE,992 22 - PARCEL; 1 PROPOSED SUBDIVISION BOUNDARY 6183 Soct, CAtsUog f3r3vel phrt,,n9 Lot Emootmg Re.,toirung YVoll 5 -4 !A40292724005 SCCTT GOV.( aE184IFE5 North tqle. 411 1 of North Arnormar, Tole 00000000 Compeny Commitmoot Numb,- 40852-12-1136.391 EXISTING WOODED FENCE LINE /BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT West line r>f Porce! 1 of tierth Alnericah - Tine rn.mgance Company CommItmenl Number 40852-12-113E31'l EXISTING TREE Tracer Hot/se BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT Existing 81%0. Shed II 9 12 WIDE GRAVEL ExIet ng BMdmg r I Es..sting 21.5`521 6210009 - Contrellel Acces9 per OINGOT Right North line el ?vfwnr.,:olo Depori1 y Plot SaLith pl Parcel I et- North A,erIcan al Wa h/ Transportation RMght of 82.- , Way Plot NIS.Vir' 4 In,sh Company Commitment Number 411052-12-11.36.351 tt, E1"..2EP76100! i1 WOE BITUMINOUS t003 HUDSON BLVD 60.00 Innt wade R,qhi , Ingress ond Caro. per Finn: Certlfmote o Bah:, 220 of Dnedn, Page 11 E ) <AA CA"-, rfl :" 1 " 3- ',,`. 3 A "3 !" i ',..' j-jj fjl 3-1 `.,3:' J-ii 00 i" A !'4, 5: A A A.' tl!t- !A ' :,; ,"1 2 W,..'JA,r-A1'1A),q-,J'3-43, ''', ,,!; A ,3.8 .,!. , , . " , 3 5., Ji: ', 14! 3 0. e 2013 Westwood Professional Services, lnc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or ca11811.com Common Ground Alliance 17 Westwood Mvh aRnal SA1J(a trx 76.407Oms , -- EXCEPTION 359 359 STREET A OUTLOT D OUTLOT M 1 ,1 ;I II 1 II Il II SII ?II ..1I Y!: sil 1 I1 2 II 3 ,1 4 5 11 6 II Il 11 _l L ..,5_ J L. 9 --+- stt , - __-4 2 a! 1 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 30c 20,2116'P.P01 dxq Date 03/28/13 sear 6 OF 23 Preliminary Plat Plan PKONE n5.9c-5i&4 FAX 462-137.S. . TtrAlFRE£ -.aea-asr-ssSR Crag W. Mane, RLS www.wenswoery.rnm - pee 06/14l13 u®R RIO Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446 1 nlrn Elmo, Mthneaota 02013 Westwood Professorial Services, Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alhonce :SS OUTLOT B 1E..-.t.l.a.,7 :::- 7kr -- - r „ mr I"-- 71:7, 'Li .-:'-' =1 1 r 1 11 II 11 [ 1 1 2 2i,1 7 I I 8 • 1 :' i ! 11 3 !! 4 11 5 ! 6 l 11 10 :1 ___, L. _:..,._..tb _7 _J L _,_ _J 1... _, ' c_ — i_ __J L t- , STRFFT F r „, 7, 7 7 757 7 7 75,_ 7 7 —_r'' l' 1 7 i I 6 !I 5 ',1 4 11 3 2 , 75 755. _ 10 1 .. , 1 t 12 ;F.', ! ;11 14 ::C; 13 11 i 1 •t. Wentroat Profitakovil Sate Inc 'MRS ArtARrvIt OMR Eden 77,0 ,1055€7753. OUTLOTO 12 OUTLOT M 71'2777 r---- ------ 3 5 borby andly the ORR Out RR. prrisavd try au, or =Wet lay 12/, 4Rsee Rupervisioa uut Sus Am a *Sy brogooki LAND SURVEYOR Rade OR lovs 44777207227777 7 2 7/11 {54, 5,55/5,51, ,57555,, , r 2!' OUTLOT/-1 / 18 5 \ Ctr, Cborfaxt07(0(0 Durrett 1SW Roved Dnorins trvidaem 8 12 Prepared for. 4077t:57771/ SI/s OUTLOT C ses.ws, 7 sEkts,-- - (7077 v./cArro o '770 OT L tki OT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 2012116177'O2 dr/S °Mx 03/28/13 h.,t 7 op 23 Preliminary Plat Plan PHONE 9,52-037 6,0 RRX 407,55077 10151527E7 1055.59.93051,0 V.,505aVA.P.C.aFacom Craig W. Mcmge, tar,R. 06/14/13 1.1ccoma No. 23021 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Lake Farms, Minnesota 0 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Flours before digging 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance Typical Lot Detail STREET EXCEPTION 359 1 I i t 8 4 5.87 at e' 1, Vats! L r- ' \S---- i ..0072 ,,,,,I, „ 55 ,5, 5555 t D 555 5, ;55 rte rJe trittii ir Wattif /L 6 , 44 „..., v it 1.5 555 2,5 .54555._ r5 -I 7- -7, 7 1, -4-i5 2 ,.,t No midi-- at, 514- 456 ,,-; 250 54-25 tad -5,51557-535 1r ata 5, `, 1 ,720 20.1.arrj slack, el! l'ile Eh eh rrY rt, 5.00 5r, j25485.5 red 17 iji 16 15 i i 14 n 13 i ni 12 iritr ! It i -,- -III- _J _ -J I-- __ _I - ..„„,„ til L.,,__ \ \ ivitiL-I g' g''' -I I- 11 -1 f"' --1 r- ' —, '''. 262 5ri1 ,i,..,. .,,3 1 s3tP7, 82 i r117 [ i , _ J ars a5,5) 1:-.2TE..7 9'5,4trertsr Scarbtek 7 ne t. or 0.menemo tot Monert Lot Arse lAttotwood Profvutonal 971877,77s, tn. 5655 An5graariDetre tots moot,. :5704 leHONir 5,2 9/23.15.0 5807 55,937.5522 Trk 5 Mint 7-040.0305760 „ R=1000.00 L=272,43 T=137 07 CH=271 59 .6=15°3633* =N68°47'18''W \P! 5 7A- 41+ 27,29 75. s., 1 ' 1 5 \ ?tall - 55. 55J5515E5 gr5) tt200 tot 7 1 been, tanl, Noe ebb Nam nee pnpned b, ae men, en Dna =wane nel 1 se, • del, Drimmal LAND NIVDIDOR weber UN tern et ne Nerere erf Itrancin - Craig W. Morse, RLS 06/14/13 ike,,,eNo 23021 8,8,2 1- Itesigooss ;et' 's1500 7 : 041710T M PA RK /GREENWA r .1" 9 rei.552 er 55755 et ICON 8157 rtur,2u. Doom Roomed Omens tsr/siatts 14' 1. re , 7507701 .1 trtf5 eneme, .18 7/40 rot, Development Data: Orp4to Sep Amer Gantt:Poled to ett_nt 5th Str00t6 Stenh ro.2555, Rettitatter !Van, r'srrrsta. Reselent.rt Outtot 40 1826 ot .61 Bi- ott 2088 or, 700.4 0' i2.0 00i\il i -rtair Castle, Ceppotp- Roo9 (Vtt .51354EFT.5 ROW 1.4158. _8 .„1:2/..7.11 118„..8'.:',, „..575iii.:82, 5'88 „ '..7.81 ' 555-5; _ • 535?rr'r'retC'er57;');:/;:e5' '57 91it 6.0i tr.' /171, 15hat --00 'I' 'frt1 CSC_4T. ,Li _ „--.s „ I.i ... ,ui,,,, limplr7', 6 7 oe 566?'828 8''86264e55N?,5,,,iiili.i cow o2 ,,„, (oii:isFand epporte5) 1 , 2 3 id 4 : 1 5 i i 6 i ; 7 i i 8 1 9 26.6± oo I L- . „i' l', .; [ ' I 1 i` Qt(t7°,:cluPd'esAn'Et,2°''',,,,, PC'ner'78d 54 ,t8-, ppm artless) 16.6t eto i 17 1 j L. - .-7 , ..,_ _ _, _ _1 lo _.„,_. _7 L __„._ _J L __._ LI L_ _.._ LI L. __„,_ _I L _J 1...,__ -25- -34 StO'ot jr775877,2°P0,71,5PG,"Z7 10.01' on Multi-forotty Cps," Spore, (058485 I. 8 K. L met 7to55, ehretn & ettem656) 8f 3 oo N'•-• 6Doe72-Q°12:dtot iA;r:5 oreo test ROW. (etk. 5k 0 Rpm e) 53 ti 04 1unte-7pMed rot orso (net ponatno 065 att & R055)28. 2* or ..i. ., -; ' - , 7 ' smi-frr P--- ± 'r--- , . 5_ „.... _Lej - _ _ in _Mt_ ..., r... _it._ ..1 ,.... _25_5, ,... 5.755- .„, de _In-- -5, d-, 8-, 1.14—, -56 T zi i hew et2 ,5" ' k4,1:1 1 t LIR ' i 7 1: ", 6 ,!' ! 5 i i 4 [ i 3 ' ; 2 I I: 1 LLL-7,s4,' !,4;:._ ',311 i,'":187:`,/i 758504„ 8 ,,i y405 8 2,, .iir 0,3 n trt t , 5 ,,,, n . i L.1.2 J • , , 21 i ',? ' 1 11':- 7"\J 1- .-j• L. -, L\--__ _,-,...: LL,2_ _2,1 :1---- 11 4i— Ji. t?trIt r2,5 trert re 2 1 12 r 5,5 ir 14 o /le,/ sr/ '> 75 VAN 5 5 t UTLOT E Trtet s, vsz' caralit R=820 00 L=978-50 T=556.612 CH=921 30 6-68°2123' C8=554°50'I PI STA=29+04.16 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 0 tr2.155 17 „. 555.v0001 (,15) Development Notes 140004,0 Smote Perrotv Lpts 65 wee t40' deep 739,00t Nete 5 14C' deep '/9.00 Proposed AMU 7650548 Ontte RCM Townhomes Rock -Bork To5575017eo chore PrOtrasaer Wanes, 05,481 0ros-2 Cr" -Strts Forney Geese 20' 0' Nuttt foterty Carat CeStrry Ovensei Net Dense-, -Squat, Sarre,/ Gt., OM' 45 t UN, 5,55, 8e7 0.53,17 Proposed Snare rannotv DoRelOothont Standards' trtsr Settoork 25' Men SeteoN5 (es, ;5/75' 05" ts75,) 53, Setback (Comet 7077 hem Sertrost 555,5, Li, 4,c. Art,sge Lot ar55, Proposed Multi-fotoltv Develoormmt Standards 5,70 ArertNer QM( ReMnred Stte 477,,o per t58, 4.0C9 0e5,4551 G,55 816 Atro .88 7.425 .54 Imcerviotts Corettogp Mmarnum h779e0ha05 Com"age 567 moonset' trIterrrt, Coverage 407 0002 SiSCICe Rettohorrtents. Stettleet Coen Spare Par ant 506 5' C/J5.5 Soar, Ph phe 3580 of .(007'ots 1.41 k, tern piastre Streefe. & omen 122) Pro -Dosed 5tteacks NrrtenninPol Intemat 6054 treat, 048 5te Street Cc:lector 0; ‚4' 5ep0t07on Rh -oho to Strang Peente 0065 Ser et Wight 50,07, 066705, 565465 otOg reennek to emote rheet (5.04) 06-Leeet ("nest Park ur,p Mond, 184 tots _ 95 Ph 93 tot: 122 homes 44 home, 18 norms: 311 Amnon 2,6ot Table 1:55me err Nymerento rattnt A Oternwo,./Pom C51.55 08105 8 Enent/Oren Gems 5,54 C Pond/Gm, See, Ode OMR, 1. ter diCter Soo, tery Onttot Poen/Coen Snore C..57 eurrof Poh C59. Nuttot G Soars 6CM 83651 00 00en Spa, 700, PonaftMen Sneer C 6.6.51 3 Open Spoon 604 Gthtot 14 Open Spore 7,0A Outtot Pond (My Ruttol Itt Frioro .04,8,5s7est Othets / LO7 ,PfhtENS/".W.5 ORE ROONDED TO Tbl: At EAREST +7(207 2 LALL .49"EA 5 -;Ri: RO5N0E9 '1) 52E NEAREST ScliAAC I 1107 7 STPEE NAMES. ARE SUf?.IEC T 40 4PP/401,47 742" THE 00,5. 4 0,4AIN40E ANC Urlarr EASEUENTS 5.22C: BE P40V,6EG 45 FE02+8E14 0.45;INA0E AND LI al EA.SEVEN 79 V.4.t. BE 5090140E0 OVER AC:. 70li51i4 u'TiLINES &Z. 41SWET OR-tW.4CE AND N TIL1 E25E077E7,TS OVER TNE ENPRE OUTLOT TO HE PROVT0E0 GN 80i47 PtAT FOR 4LL t0r GUILD?. .5 rigPoLIGA• 007107 5 STREET 45.0THS EHEI15' ARE .0*R012 .94S75 C2JRB 70 8AC,2 6» C9024 6 5/E0E SE 7BACHS CF 7 5' A: 75 (25' TOTAL) REP9E5EN7S TNT .48E NA G'5R OF 7()0E REO1o2RE6 .5 .5; JO' (15' TOTAL) ,EETBACKE. NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 1 Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota 7.75 un/oc (ovcre) .050 on/co 5 54 on/o5 .3.57 un/oc (overcrn) 2 74 os/or 5 70 en/ot 20' 98579 re t 1 250.8 sr 258 50" to shottnem 40 le 'eminter 72 75 25e 3),, (LP) 78' me 24' twee' 20' m.^ 025 pet ore • 002/ J 0 or 1,5J et 5.65 Pt .551 or 4 9.5 erir 2(57 on 213 t', 0 87 st oe 2 5'2 or 6 69 or 062 Ps 65 89 or 220 30G' 207 75471 F'PPO! 4,87 D..i= 03/28/13 sheet 8 O1 23 Preliminary Site Plan www.weerwoottoecom 2013 Westwood Professional Services. Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or cat1811.com Common Ground Alliance 12 OUTLOT B R=1000 00 L=363,40 T=183. 73 CH=351.40 Q = 20°49'17" C8=S51 °04'14'Iv PI STA=18+22 34 C4 R=82000 L=289.38 T=14621 CH=287 88 C8=561°2277"W P1 STA= 11+75 44 Deakemeet 1254 OUTLOT C 8rs s.o .r R= 820 00 L=554.41 T=288.27 CH=543.91 a=38°44'18" C6=570°J7'51'IY PI STA +22.44 .r 710 OT L Typical Lot Detail FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 201-21161F??32 anq 1 03/28/13 Sh•mt 9 of 23 Preliminary Site Plan Craig W. Mnne, 1us Daft 06/14/13 rhea. eel. Onrorrc Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professfund Services. Inc 33) 1 474 - 34'11) ,%11\s/ / z // ,/ --"(<'//// .33 -33 — — OUTLOT H ~wood ttatealonal34.4,49 Inc g9w9944,9manttte 0000.05114,•544.91.95 \OUTLOT I 14 ‘-'5- ';), 2) C040RIft7 .5024,114 7 I HEETILYPWL10 2$ 4 I hdeen timely lie elte plea eel me* he me el al 111 mpeelelo4 AM that I 9•4 • duly tamed )1/0,1342Well. WON= eel. the Yee el let See al hilsewea — " 4 Regittests titttVig; lti:00 \ bUTL'QTK ( 37B•3 .203 BA(7494 DVE 373*3' v.\ I —4- 5 2 " 2 ; 6 3 2 7 3 44 8 30 51.01; EBB (707) 8 Prepared fort Dodo.* Cflj_ 0.4.41911 07011 Dom": 11W Raxed 1:990444 b144914 3 ; 7 fft-7' f`g fti1 7 3. 07 „-Ex‘77i47 544:4 YEW' TO BE VdCATED 5TH STREET 2 6 401511K OUT OT L NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Call 48 Hours before digging. 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance Proposed kkelb—PPernne Deyekpented,Ifortedrin sto Ando Der Unit Reessrsd ;Fri, Aoss gt, tgettt g7,940 5404,4 psr us, Im0e,940U0 COIsarslacs AtfaBenunn Inepenvtons C.51.005. 5101 Prepcsed tattpeSte99 Conenaget 4.17 Open SPPCP F?e,atessments' Asszsrsa Open 734-9 0*25 ssa, Peopded Open SPOte dee eddi (07P:37 r & nds prisste streets & 7:92„; &sensed Sartbssks (onsaisststsrs) ;stern& ROW Ksals 4,4 57t Soo,' CsSscks Adjacent Psopest/ Sepdondn EuEdnct to B;93Entog Peddie t,rn, e,t 44d7h P,;ste Csysssay 1.499t0 -44-gt tttsgg; sedoce top;twate street (-at) Off.; stsost C9rss7 Pc029,-, pros.sed 4030 s, 7.426 ;a 404 3,570 sr 25' 60to strsctsses 40; do strostsse: JO' 25 Ift4t 243 10 (Bte) 223 de; .;.343 typedd 203 sn,r. 020 pes tend Typical Multi -Family Lot Details 5454 7 44" Savona ,-P4 .3.32 3 30 32 4 a 2 1'1' c„,P3 9(0 0•' • 1I 1 it 'ititfk f grid I it 0°,4170', 1 3 003 In D3 2011325920I own Deft 03/28/13 sheet 10 OP 23 Preliminary Site Plan - Town Home Area 15005. 952 9225550 f Ak 952.952.5944 1004700900.5.5159 444.49f40940etodpixtv. Ryan M. Bluhm •0006/14/13 41257 Lennar Corporation 16335 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 02013 Weslwoo3 Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance POND I y POND M AINTEh,'A CEONW1 92 ACCESS'a I H'M , _=92 NFILTRATION BASIN 1 OUTLET EL=925 0 HWL=929.0 BOTTOM=924.0 POND MAINTENANCE ACCESS H SILT FENGSE ('TYP ) \r INFILTRATION BASIN 2 ''`1:`^•:.,; OUTLET L=915.0 HWL919-5 B0700=914 0 OUTLOT M ALL Sl10RM CATCH,ASINS TQ, INCLUDE INLET PROTECTION (TYP.)---� 31 SLOPE STABILIZATION EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP.) POND MAINTENANCE ACCESS POND 3 N WL= 999.0 HWL=1001.E INFILTRATION BASIN 3 OUTLET EL=998 0 HWL=1001 6 BOTTOM=997 0 3:1 SLOPE STABILIZATION EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (11P ) ALL STORM CATCH BASINS TO INCLUDE INLET PROTECTION (TYP.) SILT FENCE (TYP.) GENERAL GRADING & DRAINAGE NOTES: ALL CONTOURS AND SPOT ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN TO FINISHED SURFACE/CUTTER GRADES UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED REFER TO THE SITE PLAN/RECORD PLAT FOR MOST CURRENT HORIZONTAL SITE DIMENSIONS AND LAYOUT, THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE LOCATION AND ELEVATION OF EXISTING UTILITIES AND TOPOGRAPHICAL FEATURES WITH THE CANNERS AND FIELD —VERIFY PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION THE CONTRACTOR SHALL IMMEDIATELY NOTIFY THE ENGINEER OF ANY DISCREPANCIES OR VARIATIONS FROM PLAN, ALL RCP FOR STORM SEWER SHALL BE CLASS Ili JNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED ALL CATCH BASINS AND MANHOLES IN PAVED AREAS SHALL BE SUMPED 0.10 FEET RIM ELEVATIONS ON PLANS REFLECT THE SUMPED ELEVATIONS. ALL CONSTRUCTION SHALL CONFORM TO LOCAL RULES POSITIVE DRAINAGE FROM THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED AT ALL TIMES EROSION CONTROL NOTES: ALL SILT FENCE AND OTHER EROSION CONTROL FEATURES SHALL BE IN —PLACE PRIOR TO ANY EXCAVATION/CONSTRUCTION AND SHALL BE MAINTAINED UNTIL VIABLE TURF OR GROUND COVER HAS BEEN ESTABLISHED, EXISTING SILT FENCE ON —SITE SHALL BE MAINTAINED AND OR REMOVED AND SHALL BE CONSIDERED INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. IT IS OF EXTREME IMPORTANCE TO BE AWARE OF CURRENT FIELD CONDITIONS \MTH RESPECT TO EROSION CONTROL TEMPORARY PONDING, DIKES, HAYBALES, ETC. REQUIRED BY THE CITY SHALL BE INCIDENTAL TO THE GRADING CONTRACT. ALL STREETS DISTURBED DURING WORKING HOURS MUST BE CLEANED AT THE END OF EACH WORKING DAY. A ROCK ENTRANCE TO THE SITE MUST BE PROVIDED ACCORDING TO DETAILS TO REDUCE TRACKING OF DIRT ONTO PUBLIC STREETS DENOTES SOIL BORING DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES HEAVY DUTY SILT FENCE DENOTES EXISTING CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES BIO—ROLL EROSION CHECKS DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 300 20121161G3A01 daq 03/28/13 shoat 11 of 23 YHONL 952-93,51;4 FAX 952.9S7 Sa22 TOLL FREE 14SA X3I-51 wEwlwt weaMwWwwm 4 - !hawse HW Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mumnesota, 55446 Savona 1 +ice Elmo, Minnesota Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 1 c 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance r a/ Wlestwood kottesk.11$49vEue,,Inc, 7EE9 aoaaram acme Ed it 65.94.6 , rt; ;IF-A1-29 POND MAINTENANCE ACCESS .9, INFILTRATION BASIN 5—'1 OUUET EL=964.0 - HWL=968 2 BOTTOM=9610 OULOTM %Baby caagy nn thl. plaa won pagans, by ma to anew my alma me,,wride• tad dal f am a daly Lemma M01199.0NAL 14.199SIZ Inn of Aft at.d bbasaaola - fic9fxdatuc INFILTRATION BASIN 47 OUTLET EL=952 0 HWL=9560 BOTTOM=951.0 311 SLOPE STABILIZATION EROSION CONTROL BLANKET (TYP ) POND NWL=965.0 HWL=968.2 POND 4 NWL=953.0 HWL=956 0 7 L POND MAINTENANCE ACCESS CET 099,,tEd, Dr.= limed DralriEs 999tdaaa. I _ft LT FENCE TIP) Prepared lor: 9 942 OUTLOT C POND 6 NWL=948.0 HWL=952 0 P ND MAINTENAN ACCESS 11V9968.5 EIW=952.0 FW•9965.5 F3W— 952, 9 9-9 BW99t48,0 RETtill$P WA (TYPr. ALL STORM CATCH BASINS TO Tww958 o I INCLUDE INLET PROTECTION (TYP ) BWE-958 OCK CONSTRUCT104 -9—Z41:RANCE (TYP.) 1 1 x prOND OU T EL=942 0 EX 1HWL=946.9 (PROP, HK1_=943.4) lt94F2ESooRCP RE=948 00 E=935.61 54FES RCP lE=935 00 LEGEND: DENOTES SOIL BORING DENOTES SILT FENCE DENOTES HEAVY DOTY SILT FENCE DENOTES EIX'ST1NG CONTOURS DENOTES PROPOSED CONTOURS DENOTES EXISTING STORM SEWER DENOTES PROPOSED STORM SEWER DENOTES EXISTING TREE LINE DENOTES APPROXIMATE TREE REMOVAL LIMITS DENOTES EXISTING SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATION DENOTES BIO—ROLL EROSION CHECKS DENOTES EMERGENCY OVERFLOW ELEVATION NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 20191 19'9999917 999 Ntc 03/28/13 stunt 12 OP 23 Preliminary Grading, Drainage & Erosion Control Plan 090N9 1079104177 o. 959-937-S029 9999. FREI 94389192 3117 ww-9,...samodpEcom Ryan 53. Bluhm on 06114/13 „. N.. 412,57 m Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plyntouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 02013 Westwod Professional Services. Inc 1 8' DIP F\LUG 5 8" DIP PLUG (TYP.) MH IRE=1048.2 1E-=-1037.2 2 _ RCA SIN MH F(E=1047.4 lE=-1035., ; 4 MH RE.-1057.) IE.-1035,C 2 MH RE=104 lE=1030.7 15 14 V 12 POND 1 NWL=926 0 HWL---929,0 \ OUTLOT D 1/FILTRATION BASIN BURET EL=-925 0 HWL=929.0 ?I0M0M-924.0 A.' op AA \ i / \ / 1 / \ / t \ / _ r \ , -- - - - _100, \ / \, 3 MH 4 RE=F0 4,5 lE=1 5 MH RE=1 IE=10 ti*H RE=1047.6 5 E=1 1F.1030.2 -=1 5 6 \ Mbl RE=1028.8 1E-1017.8 E---1038. =-1027.9 1 4 =1033.3 '1022.3 INFILTRATION BASIN 2 OUTLET EL-.915.10 HWL=919,5 BOTTOM-.914.0 OUTLOT M RE-1019,9 IE.1008.9- \ YD. (TYP.1 8 \ 9 4.0 mg, R .1 tROP M RE--1062,3 DROP IE=105C.3. o. \ 13 \ 45 '\ 14 \ --DROP iiI1-1 X RE=10'i1.7 / 10900 E=1039 7 141-1/ /0 R =1035.5 =1023.0 RE/1047.5 1E 1031.6 -MH RE.1044.1 1E-1032.1 e" 8' PVe' SAN /( =1043,5 4 OUTLOT F - 037 9 \ 5 MH .1024 1 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN (BY OTHERS' 2 SD' ROW 4 10 6 8' G (TYP. MH RE=1,0 g4O21.2 2 RE.1028.2 IE.-1017,2 4 MH6 H 112\E.1024. \FE =1010,4 7 =1009.4 '1 lE=1023 RE1034 8 \ it.1009 9' = CRC 4411 RE= 024.8 DROP IE=1006 " DIP PLUG Auf'" ara 1 28' B-8 1 F7E1037.-4 =10254 2 4 5 6 7 547F.FET F 7 6 5 4 9 12 RE=I039 4 c, 1E=1023.0 (1Q MH RE=1039.9 1E=1022.4 RE=-1022 0 1011.0 ''\/ RE=1018.5 1 2 8 1E=993.0 --DROP \MH_/' RE.103 .5 .1023.0 DROP lE1009.0 lEtii32,5---- lE=992.2 = -----HYD, RE=1025.3 IE-s991 5 CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (BY OTHERS) STUB IE.990 4 12 -MH 13 RE=102f,.0 IE.-1017J RE=101 0=10* MH 1E-9 MH - RE.1014.4 lE=993 9 RE-=.10 lE=99 14 -MH RE.102 lE=10 2 MH RF.1019 4 lE=1008.4 INFILTRATION BASIN 3 OUTLET EL=998.0 HWL=1001.6 BOTTOM=997.0 Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance GENERAL UTILITY NOTES: * THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY ALL EXISTING CONDITIONS PRIOR TO CONSTRUCTION AND NOTIFY THE OWNER OF ANY DIFFERENCES. * UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED, ALL MATERIALS, CONST TECHNIQUES AND TESTING SHALL CONFORM TO THE 1999 ED. OF THE 'STANDARD UTILITIES SPECIFICATIONS FOR WATER MAIN AND SERVICE LINE INSTALLATION AND SANITARY SEWER AND STORM SEWER INSTALLATION BY THE CITY ENGINEERING ASSOCIATION OF MINN." AND TO THE "STANDARD SPECIFICATION FOR HIGHWAY CONSTRUCTION" MiNIN DEPT. OF TRANS., AUGUST 31,2005 INCLUDING THE CURRENT ADDENDUM. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL BE REQUIRED TO FOLLOW ALL PROCEDURES AS OUTLINED BY THE LOCAL AGENCY * THE CONTRACTOR SHALL RECEIVE THE NEGESSARY PERMITS FOR ALL WORK OUTSIDE OF THE PROPERTY LIMITS • VERIFY EXISTING INVERT LOO & ELEV. PRIOR TO BEGINNING CONSTRUCTION * THE WATER SERVICE SHALL BE INSTALLED 11479 A MIN OF 7 5 FT OF COVER THE CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY THE CITY AS -BUILT CONSTRUCTION PLANS TO CHECK LOCATION AND MATERIAL TYPE. • ALL STORM SEWER PIPE SHALL BE CLASS 5 UNLESS OTHERWISE NOTED • THE CONTRACTOR SHALL CONTACT "GOPHER STATE ONE CALL" FOR FOR UTILITY LOCATIONS PRIOR 70 UTIUTY INSTALLATION. 6 7 RE=1006.2 lE=-995 2 OUTLOT M LEGEND EXISTING Sanitary Sewer Water 1 Hyd w \Valve Storm Sewer PROPOSED Sanitary Sewer A Woter Hyd w \Valve -I Storm Sewer Sanitary Force Main - - FUTURE Sanitary Sewer Water Hyd w \Valve Storm Sewer NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota - r I 0' 200 OG' 2111%,1161,1,C, d,r9 03/28/13 5hw0 13 OF 23 Wonwowl PiroArAAAAA Sao*" AA 7691 Msgr., DMA Odan rame, 55.344 aNg.gag-5150 FA% 9b2,31-SOTa TOUR,. 1.68-.1-5150 www.wAtwoodpatonl I baba =lily that itio plea ow moo. IF? so or aim ay db. orpovialoa dal 1am a fr. lad PROVISSSIONAL MON= tar eto lama at gar Va. Ryan6L Blubm 06114/13 16-- No. 41257 - 0,1, _ af RIAD MW %Award DraWOrg ArAtAA Prepared for Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mil'Innesota, 55446 Preliminary Utility Plan Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hcurs before digging- 811 or cal1811.com Gommon Ground Alliance L 2 7 RE=IC.37 1E-1025,1 2 3 4 Wrtwood Profooacee Sore04 Inc tEd9 Adadroor Edon r,wWw.MN553w. OLTTLOTE 6 9 7 A/i1-1 8 RE=1012 0 15=1001.0 ,MH11 RE=998.t lE=987,8 RE=966. IE=975 1 2 w, RE=992 2 '1313 IE=981 2 MH 6 RE=997.5 lE=986 5 8 MH RE= I km*, cowl* etwt Me plea me p' Ike me of mrsovia cod OW la & Etoly - !IMMURE ENGIN= - the Inn al do -' al lemma. OUTLOT M arrigeme 7/ \ Pe,. Pp, City \i,* , 2 H =977.2 H 4 E=979.5 lE=964.4 POND 4 T-....1WL----953 0 2 1-841;:.= 956 0 DROP MH E.=-983.9 OP IE=971 2 7 REE 72.3 E= 7 E=974 7 E=962 2 MH RE=989.8 lE=978-8-1 -3 /1- P PLUG ww. INFILTRATION BASIN 4 OUTLET EL=952 0 HWL=956.0 BOTTOM,- 951 0 5 I 7 6 13Eo9634 IE 2. / / 18 57:9 16=9547 4 /..0U7LOT I INFILTRATION BASIN 5 ▪ --v.- OUTLET EL=964.0 poN\D 5 HWL=968 2 BOTTOM=963 0 1394„,965.0 HWL=968 2 STREET 1 6413 RE= 4 0 lE=9 Dowiroo* CIE amok, Drown- Rodord Ihrorin4_ftf_date 8 V. (,) -9615 -955. tft -MH RE= 74.7 • As) 9 .6 RE= • - 4 ISE "EL j 8 'TRH RE=984 11 lE=973 8 Prepared for `-MH RE=975.9 IE=964.9 9 831=1.2. IT 951 1 `-MH RE=974 5 IE=963 5 \ 01 -wwwww. OU77_0T C POND 6 NWL=948 0 H WL =952 0 931=955.0 943. '31=95 '16=941 136=989. \OLIOTK RE=971,2 =94 E=953.8 E=942.8 STREET NOR POP sr, CONNECT TO EXISTING SANITARY SEWER (BY OTHERS) STUB lE=940,2 RE=955.9 IE=941.7 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATER MAIN (BY OTHERS) E=-957.9 =946,9 74 =959 4 946 2 #100' = E=94-8 MH 136=9640 IE=947.8 MH 47 MH RE=973,2 RE=970 9 1E=962.2 lE=948 3 801 PVC PLUG lE=-946.6 RE=960.0 IE=949.0 RE=968.9 lE=957 9 (TYP ) cri EX POND OUTLET EL=942.0 EX. HWw=-946,9 (PROP. HWL=943.4) 48' FES I4CP IE=942.01 RE=448.00 LEGEND EXISTING Sanitary Sewer Water Hyd. w \ Valve Storm Sewer PROPOSED Sanitary Sewer -4 Water Hyd- w \ Valve -1 Storm Sewer 44 Sanitary Force Main - FM- lE=9p8 61 FUTURE Sanitary Sewer Water Hyd. w \Valve \FES RCP lE=-9p OD Storm Sewer NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 120i 200' 300' 270211ETWT\ 0: owg Dar 03/28/13 Sbmt 14 OP 23 PHONE 0gwt FAX 452.005.5070 iourwa welawoawsiso wro-wwinrwoodroaren D. Ryan FL Bhdarn 06/14/13 ,pw 41257 Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mizmnesota, 55446 Lake Elmo, Minnesota Preliminary Utility Plan estwood Profess!ono' Services, Inc' 0 b 62' DOADADE. NA0ICE1A- --'14`h; TC, ADAM MEDI OPANDLAN ENDADMENS MATERIAL CAPADOT SPEC ADDI CAP GRANULAR MATERIAL PenDINV 7)11*7 00 Mt OPINION DP EDI HARM. 02210001 MATERIAL PALTERED 007 DT TNT 'ITIPEN 10001347101, DETAIL) CHLAT,.7 EARTH FOUNDATION Nreveifur MAMA BASE SEICA----0 CRAMPED STADES PROPERTY LINZ TALL M. ROA TOLLE TATILATED 4' ADO. 1070711000 DRAPE ,--41414710 SRA. POPPER LH., 71''ADD DUCE 131UPTafflPREAARLT covrenteur Eirm 01 rap otAwArPau 87'crAl/77. 1477,e TYPICAL RATER SEAR. P (10' DOPPEJA 'SFAISL'11111 N14"vrcdpAi,,,s1.1,V,=',4nft Nat EXTEND AARDT MAN DAMAN 0( JILNIMITH COVER FOR AR. SEIM. LtNAT "al'IrAgST taA' rtirfratArTAZIATAVATXT '144.11C'Ir'" DEINFORCED avows Pl. APS NETIN. SNARL TORPORN AIM Mr RAINRAERRNIt Of N.. 477.177 TESS OCEINTORDED TWAT. PIPIT PHI EDE MA DAZE AND STRENDEN CLASH MED= HEREIN 3 ISTOAL4itiCTSAN RITER WIN STET,. 'AULcoNudsu rumLZZ;,,‘, z A 0" ALANDOLT SEAMS SHALT At 14.441,40 ONvUu 4010 POID SECT.' IR ALLOIT 1.44 PRIEHT ADAHRTMINT ANZATITH AGRAISTE 5 JAWS (7141711000701081100071000 DRAEL ITT TOND. DRODAT RIM 707 NINO HANTS PROVIDED ON ALL STORM STN. 1191011011 .M.,'XINALIP' .41,070NIOI,97 70 ra:E411,101tt FABRIC DEED INIDER ,177.171 AM. IT MDR ENE A 0 ITURNITIN 0 171.077111. ERASN WARDS ON ALL TIARED 0100 SECT., Atc SILT SHALL BY CUANZA 6111' tRale RV RR.. AT TNT END OP Mt PRO.; STORM UPPER PLANS Weetwood ProfessionA $ittbitbk 7699 boabrom Orb/ tobrt 1.674, MN tb.. 700455 457,937,1 SO 71,% 962417-0)71 7013FN. 1,77,776417-1150 Vrekbb.bovillWoodpLoten D COMPACT. &MIL, • ASTM 731327 EADANDMENE MATENZALATHLTC, TADDRIT MEC 3040LEDT"'T'A h • _TRIA'.; 0ZZ lAZ Aga% ITTV 47EAC 0 0707 TAME' •EITRETAIIINT NATTRIAL DEALS C0N£0411 AS. PTAH EARLE 1 fFOR 1,1;r NITARY SEWER Pr IPP, RESTRAINT', I...CHOW TO UE PEPERMINED IN ACCORDANCE WM I V 1, RESEARCH ASSOC SEANHARDS 16' 401 PEND r- (TYPICAL) PLU. 2 0 T—I.Nst 1617 &VP / Magfor NOTE ININNICS .Y/tALL u1STRAI10F0 WITH THE USE at APPROPED MECHANICAL JOINT RPSULAINING GLANDs NM. DARTING RATT -- RINDS AC MIN 1 IUNAS NORM. (AV WET. ATM. 141.4 LAZARD A NANNOIN 1049040 .73/00773' ON Mitt AND OUT.. ifotIV; — tter .7,6t7.7 77/ wro ..L.anrw cat., HMS, RAMA otlt 11,48111 tabor came Datt. mancoNN2 .2222 RAITTINI.AN.T2 2222 22.22. RATTAN a. PAR 2.02 - I hoof, cably dot Ebb ytta boo p.p.. by no ar _ ALA. A40nrriato togi thof as. dbfy bead Ylt01705.0t411, MM.= =do - 1.7, 74 tlo Szett 74hittemobt Ryan KtBluhm 06/14/13 Liccast 7411 41257 Perioitoue 0517171 ‘tb66 C'e, C66, nal , tit RpacP. paar C, 909,19,1$ .;,`4 'NfInfr "'""' 47' 71077.0717.17705 OP ARR.. TREVES PITREMOnt N(12 RE ME PERSONNEZ FAIERADON SHALL DE DUCTILD 1.4 DIPS S1.40S-32 4 ALL MTN. SMALL POMP, TITLE EDAM SPED 0111 TA ALL FITTINDS SMALL 81 MADEIRA MDR PIPE vow POLIETHALEND ENCASTMENT ALL casneVowur SO(L0 DE INSTALLED LATTIZEIND PORDIDEIT DRES 47 DOLES ILST CATE VALTIT DOR ALL APPLIDATIONS 07700050» 70 DAMS 0 RATS VALFTS 777/ 8007212.42 MORE AMERIGAN MIR CONTROL ARM. APPRDTED MHZ DAES 1451770 RIDE 20121222 RIM CEAlt Mr 7 et 7 _USD DUETFAELV TRIMS 10/7 ALL APF1K,7177777777 MATO TRAIT IR N.. h RDITELECT 010473 SHALL Pt AILETTLER LINETTAL 00 00 APPROVAR aurreenv WYE, MALL COMPLY RIAD PH. SPEC 222, 2. 2 $ OLarr, AND .12" ON ALL RAMS AND 71171,11815 SKALA Ad STAINLESS STEEL 0 13. 67074717771 9110., BE 715671740 b 0 77£17 MEN OP CURD +, DITAANTS SNAIL DP 'CATERERS "DAMS LOUR 44-01 00 APPATNED EQUAL 2110e0 vow £1,000 518070111007 START OP PAINT. litt 0' 1172040(1 "t 11907. TED OUTINT 120221.21 7010 2.21/2- (2 71 DOSE ZONNEPR)1. AND ONE , NOZZLE 74 21,47.11=s1V-,,,,Irs172,-"Ilegs.t,f147,11W4P.T.VW .47,40 PROJECE WATERMAN PUNS z,,vmsuEta-,ATVNIIVDISLZOLZIPA,IPA"'" 112. RANTRARR tENTR Pt, Ste., fit $1$191300 7767017700 70 or? 10001100 0667666 107 '00/67t404.bt,71,64 mum:, PVE ReeC s /77 17,7 tE 1716 671t1 KI:47Z1,4 o41400 hireLoiloiri ;,14,511/1=t1A.,A="477217 PVC PAPE AND 70 • Ati. WOO, SENtk 761 PIT. SOY AO ON $ SMOOPLE PALLED PCP PIPE AND INTNIN. LONEORN TNT 771070077177715 AR 171/7 A -1444 770 tlit .1.„ STANDARD DIALENSION RATIO (ED. AVD STRAPPED RIVITRZATATT IMPICATED . 700 PS,. SPEDITICATIONS 1760 SPECIAL AROVISIONt RITINIRACED CONCRIPE Pl. AND M.N. SNAIL 0170102411 NNW 7007 RINVIRERRINTS 77 MRANT SPet SRN .178701070 ONCRETV PON) PCR TM Ives vox AND STRITNOTH 11400 SNELIFIED AMIN 10IN40 0.2 Al.1101...t RISER SECTIONT SNAIL At M.. ADD CROOTT VIM RUBBER 70T RAND N.. PROM. ON Ati, SANITARY 07700 NDIRCLITS D SANITARY SEVER INLET AND OtlftEr PIPES stuut DU VOIND ITT auviazt ran PASSET. ELLTIBLE NATTRTIATNT DRAINECTIPAN 177 11.77711 AlAttb1171717. 271724010707 Of TM PIPE ANTI 440.1.017 111 TAKE Mau J A ID D. AHNNOLE stonaw .2210ALL 17 arstAarp DATER EDP DONE SEM. TO ALL. TON NMI, A.RINTIVERIT IINERANIA Pattlatt 10 ALL S.W. CM ETUDE NIZST NAM A 2c40' /717141bOt 40.470712 17/17 NATAL API. RDNDIND FIRM THE 10141 OT PTA TO THD.TD CRAZE SETTATION It UPON 7/1777776 A DONALEZERN TO ,Of EXISTIND SANITARY STE. 01*0DR MANDDLE mfr.. D.. SHALL DT DEDIENTTA ANDERIAD ENT ESSIETIND HTE. 11 DRADIDATELD LATTALLAT VA 2,21TRIVf PRIDE AD NEMER 70 201 ARMY. AlANNOLE SANITARY SEIVER PL4NS MAN 117eTtig7t\\, vIIIUMFHT ilf17 L* '- A,VS AWE.) 0411- 000llototoC OR WAR INVIMONERTIPO ''- TEN'AtallgifrfatO W. BANN 777 SECTION A -A — AltbItt,1 Erna., 100000 EARN. A Mviava fuNrSR 04100271 040 P.M "i ADD DIDIDE rzofArdlg;PRCRO PONCREES ours: aver. NASA Rut A006-, ARE— tet$9$9, 91999 FgArce ./2! RTAATT 04,,,,,21.T.J.72.TrratNer — "2=2=Nrilgstx /67,7c7b7.7 Ast tfir'ry Atettettente NOTES tett aerce JAW 9911,9 9.91, 9.919tle HARDT 400. #91.9,9 tzt t WA' rani iire16.7771- NAD .2 DA 2748 4.7251ZSaMillligann, HZ" plv1 ettetet, 7.1*,..WAV47113 MatW'1777 Aet telle Watt MD' HAM' 011,411,11 AW1 rif. 4 4 711r. 111” ras (l'ArrI,VE IN BOULEVARD) RtZTIAIT CONTD. .1.2, trIN VD. OTTER N. VIM CONCLTIND PIVOT 111( 7101 1)141 Wiese 72" MORT' BEITEIN Met CAS.. A" AND NANNTIA2 RAN. :OM. DR MD A" INA. AND MIMI.° MiligNNAR ON / TrAttkrIGNIN RITINNTRITNI uts AMIE v' SECTION A -A RIN. 00 3111, RtNus $ IttePteig$ PLENA. ama FLEXIBLE WATERTIGHT CONNECTION Ng ON. 91.1, 0,241, 1.01, 414,4111,44 L.4,141411, 011.1114,411. war tar mat ADIN. DANA A 00". let net Stttentette. 91991447995 .414ta 1 4 E # ta, teet trit.ela 4$6.$ Atta.cat ettet, IM.V2iNgr"as.atv ,IZn=reirpr"ZtArkirip sW:it.freT"'"'" 1Y4 411 4 1 SO= SH.41.1114 111r14474.0 C.'S r113,12.4.11 7.04:114414¢ OM" .41415 11 *OM reVN NTRZTTINAT2 ATWRINNATT!.. (PIPES .77 OR 1E.60?) RINDS L.A.122.42, TART 11.7AR Rtrouvv,,,,,N 1:11'"71:811"4"" " vnelry- vvvv. "" PRECAST N. EDIER STAB —f,ii,;41""2"" 2 STRIPS MINTWASTIC . MAN AIRITS CENT. Jrcerre PRICLAST .28 000, 171.72274 47771;;t77-1 90,9 leen SW $941, trax., ttLif 411.141.11114,41.1141.4. .1.117114 IMMO tee, Prepared for: 0410(0 4400 439 199$ 1,1a...0 4r 4.1,11' testr., 9241,,014.1141,1,0 AtU111714M14 4541144,S14 A415t SU.. COM, 1,411 0. AA. TAM. OVCALATE NALTANOSP 44..1177 114111.1412 ,E44710.1411 a.1-11, C4inl MOM, MIT 9-990 41,14M 1.11.1.1111` PA 411 to,...178 1.1,114. Ate, xware. 99$97110tett lter 1122240702 7710017 gg, ref 99.9,e=le 011411 Male! WW1 „cf="1"Ati AIM DALT RAMAN. SI TRAM CONCRETE MANDOSE 14LO00:3 °;47.1=7,1=Z;S7011/14;tr EVRT AREAS PARA DATE SAIDE 000 ,..1140141.1. YALU BOX ADAPYYN (at 117431 .242) 1.1111 7' 7,177 VANUA liOr. ALL 4.04.0 ADD 7/0177 AMIN I 00 IN DEPRAVIDALT SOILS" TATALt LOS Mk. MECHANICAL -VINT THRUST RETAIN. DIANDS AT ALL HUM SUPPLELHAS VS. LARS SPANNERS SPRAT IN- RP. DIREDIDD Eir ENEMA. 4117077310 TINE 3 DEOTEXTDX TAMP ANN t LAYER 717164117 bt TOP 071014081 NOTES SUPPLE 0. 11 DA. VALtE "XI urP, PROJECT AT ZIPPERED BE AND TAGINDER 11714 AI, S.. At Atlitti. 70 1118 CITY CAR. 1171717707.2 - 675 SPEDITIEN DADIP ccsa Plur APP FITNINCS 177 At USED 1707 „maw SEM. HARP SEETZON 1171' TV .sr 147711111771 DATEE PHAD 1140 fi"7414011 Pod"' 77 urn DIP I --2401427000EI771 TIECESRARY VASYSZ7v---.1`4. 0711110400, SIM MYATT - r„,:e" woRtAR RASTING oury IR., MM.! 2 ROOM 1 INTIRE ATIO Manor 151 NEENAN CARTITIC R-7047, it$90, 770 RE.* RUTTER MAP" WI TIORTART .71-`INEDY Lt. 11071407 292rAt COVER STAR . Tat, 077 YOWL 0,77 vAR D. fejet.,$Ce$99fgettet A uu ,7101001074 ,ur e -1 9 >115. e0.14 Au. N.. .2.2 4,11011.1,114 ANH tat net, Ylkallt VW" 4,41444141014 9$9 Vet$09,194914 MOM, 97$91 EN. At DDT A1,11.111111,11' Mgt Attetttettle 9,99t 9$91 9979, crtx 5.4 15* 90929 7660 .66b0.777.17 RanATT Atteetzerettle (TeNC9199 9199 9 N. a. PAR $9.91$ tt, 91994911, murear ReActra .11041.13. Nen. rItt tetteete WV.. AVM, 11191.14r111 211.1:1".11 6,9199 AMMO, Pert ANP taw., $9,9 .11741..1111 .4.1"14. .31,11404 $14411.1 1.141e$49.9911 2," SECTIoN (FOR erIfin) -"7.10E "041, ARTANto- 71404170477 10 IfILHOUT RAVER Wag RISER lartNAN 77,51%7777 ,01'18TYPE 'It SOLID teRtIT 4.2.12ID TRIC.RES 1727 LRAM httrYgrt, RINC.41, liANNOLE riNtut Maori, ON 1,15IDE AND WM. LUNGS PL N, , VAX RP A- tite999,9 , SECTION A -A VIT, iitruCgiT ELEVATION At TO, Sr. at -1,9$ PUS $99,9299 $9,991$ 9$4,9$ COY Itett tteteke, XXIX{ eteite tetet 144,1, t=1,24'37.11; Alwr g.„71== mor ..u.cvnumro tYmteri *won,. 2.2022 41 PAM AtraT Lot M11311 "Alp 114,,ga 57M., leir1" RAW QM. TRAtTcon zacrAT $ ett et' ..111. ISYM44,1 :ANA AA DST.. #1411,211,54 WW2. (PIPER RV" OR LESS) Call 48 Hours before digging NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mannesota, 55446 50 Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota 1(1`,2771177)T1711 rftt= 03/23/13 Skeet 15 or 23 Details lc 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc '1,1n;QM"` ...Ogirsta.srTIO orat. (00 c..1.) OR OUP SYNTH ^perr-smr s' rat. SEALAUTT W/TA, R.. OR NU. 711114 2:18L Pr fi TT. 00710,00 LAHTI. T-TOTTZ Mar "8 SOUR 10 !TS 40710 ROHTTALTH PORCHOLLS (A RIR I H ank Or 0101310 40097300 kg,,,'111:11,477". liannte SAIRAIS SMOOTH ON MOW AND OUTO1. —s PANG, COM WAD Owe ttr.???Vg! CAR(IST 01007410 ro. . Ms Mom. TotaTo rem C,..t nos toessar los. rm. As AO talorstela. zsa2,47; s1=4,17m osre prigegagro. A.,...”J4 Tx. TETT AM As. rAm =At 9.10. Ts.s. swan o imss...r mars LL «a swan Tomos .Tax assaii.a Mao Mr TT. .4104,1=2,1Tzriawatt aksor Soo. (PIPES 30 00 LARGER) ICAltilrfriraffofigAZ.V0PL.VraTial fgolr 10,1000 TORSOR. ARO sArnsunc OPERAS.. 0100700 coupLELLD TO ATOW DAMARA I':gartV.SMILIInntSr 1,7t1WforTIli fsfrITTLR'gr grIr 3 AMU 30070300 RHO S.M. WITH 040700rr00 HRH. Stan. ...U. AAP Efr LAOS THAN 3 NOR ORLATAR mu, 12 700103010041000009 ILA. 041000 10000,3107030101 FILL. AT SO (0041140011)D0770VA10 000,0170 PrOtOrtrat RAMPS amsr JO,STDISCILD 47000 INTRatrotnin SIDEIVALDS AND TRAILS --00000 0404 WAR.. OA RIM CONSAXTZ ALL Lnerr: .riregz,I.Ltrel;mf,,,,,Mtire6DOVIDT 0.1,Varr Ant TA. Wastroced Professleru*Serkm, Inc 0000 Anastos, Inn TOTA Ta0f 1334 10000 000/117,01 TS0-A3T,S$22 100,0(.0. 00000000073 aOST SAIRrAR RTIORAIR RISCO NSW. st vAm9.t. TAM SMOOTH TN NS.. AND OPFSISe DrarLar stalros„, MOH TUT 7/7100040 stir rra... AR SQ.. A SM. OITHAUSTIO trAL Ori SLAB tra ,m NtfTfL42741" Larth,p,,r.t,7f.?Z 7 Yr Lx..J.LJ MST PIA Tlittner 01 1„.„, T. . Ana nat At nem /so swat. woo. c.o. ona sisr asav wow. Swes T eTryle 0 P. mamma. sr.. MAU DX car mem Arm.. . um... M.A. Ar. Arm mys sasta rsomr si Tomor Tassoart Tomo. T sTa. Ras Tra Arra tor Hann LAMS, SToTaes rrermrs Arm a.m. A mmirem. Mars Us.. wirmyrre. A. TT. rts. <Darr ;AVMs RAC S'A s is Is a. AnTA 00 ,r o" RITAILLORTS SHOE — o *" SIT.APIMM. RM. 0111*400 A. . meaDJLt VP% TAME' SOPS al, PPR MOOT Pfil 2 4" SONCRSTO SOW AHD 0171011 o TOO. ,L,LP PRIA rr ?WOOL BPI' 8 nowDALLE vow ANA cum* - Rant o st, SUR1I0 UN TABLE vairtrt ANT 007740 S 01000000 IPELIP DOURDE ADJACENT DETAIL (403000010402000011400100, LATHY OLO 04,0 's-AsAr ; itgrff BITUMINOUS BASE COURSE ADJACENT DETLIIL MT TO STALS I kmols, 311.1T ebot dal Or was papw.d ar car my &hp nepava imd thol t am • aly tionand PIOSEISIONAL MGM= oalmr a tint 51•10 40Itramarao. Ryan M, BM= Dats 06/14/13 41257 Rolsbarat U*'2; 00)410 ?"1" ITT s ITTIITX ow YAWS' A —0 MATCH ra ads:am si,a cur TaCr At. TAP A OH IP COMM PITTISTROSISOR DLALDErt vENTIL *Mr- nrriaLIL ;LOA 0000 sit; rlas SANTA PLJ e-AL*; .p_My city at. -A Tonna wont , I ,MAAILMIrSt sAA. mfrs. SECTION A -A 10170. rum Tom. TO/00.0 TOOTTsas mom T tors annatan mo. Tot TTT0T ON ms IsTrons T row. Taaarsim To. two . 0.000 Tan own. non - I A ROLLED ROTH 1) NOTES (0)074014009007 11713 :sstreS Draw. 40 VHSTABIS ROILS AITIA 17 kgargItIVItt. " FILM TAHRIA POO RH RAMO, MAUR .1rAP%71'" , mXoss 4001S01T0 M.. SALT A.S.) Ortroottonon ; 7100410000476 FRU CONSTRAISTIOA Lamm. r Dvc. PARJORATZI, WILTA-trarli r" LISRIL 04011) ert 3 WM 4. SECTIONAL VIEW ,„,--STOASS SRAM 0000000.1' fP/111749107-PL=TeD OPE.. SHALT Or SVAR-"Zr ARIAL. 4070 A.S. 40007300 STALWO PIPS TO STRUCTII. NALL. PLAN VIEW' AT CONHASTION 10 SORRA SOSO STROM. IUSED BY 0IRECI1O0 OP C111; ENCI NEER ONL) r—Onsa,.., snot / to— nor 1.1. MSC. MOUSTABLS MA& A 067100 10400114111.70 TO a-ste CUM RM.. rommrsa., 0/ Juror CU ? Ai ::--"Ar - A SUMMINFA' „ 1 -- S.A. Or non, A W -RELATIVE CURD STOP LOCATION P r WHIR I (0/0010000000 Akr AWL.. final ary LLILL VIM A araatir t Ann RAM., S.LL Or POSITIOARD 070 THT FARR Of Dm' COM 01107frld ROAM. n RH A RASTIO 31370. flo�t000000030 TO Int LOTATIAN ar CORR stn. 0 0/0000 Pox co. 00 1014 plant ea. SLOW. OM rAtt 40 WOO Prepared for. (FOR CURB STOPS) soz A.Ar÷stO aarn AA0-0. Zorn n.1^ 02 To a As yen s" Tsar -;lor A:1TP 4/0 swam • snout. I gana NTT 0/4 000070040 T.0.0 01.1. To. 0300001 yen s" Tyr 0O-L*0**. *ft ELEV03/5'4 raz,,z.r= TAMS 0000 / 1...3.fiNAM MCA. cm SLAM Arne =sr PISTITS TsTasstiatT .Iart PLAN 200107 SLRUCTUPE APILE, 0-4/ 010010 lAnascr Port, 00 01 na MAMS 0.0.00. 11001470S 00010040700 MOO .norlasr ARAM= Man SS SOT sISTATTO AHD 21.3.14 NM MAMA. CMS connorna S.. M.. Tam ALA Apr* arum* ra ALL "MISR Won P. Tarr FR. To Rs corater. r*Lr atalatr. MS. A Sr. AMMer ...A IVA ALL Ari*****tryr MORK Pox nos INN. AMA.A. A 40010001 T. Sot mar ato 01077400000 SWAM WAWA. .als Br AMMO.. SW S.W. Malt Ss 0. COMSTArr.. 5.14 00000001404100330. Pralts irt. OR MOOS MAR ANS rt. APPAMTS Mr Om 70001000 1 Oat Ms. Tor TONSTACTST MALE Ns.. 017001000 Ar VIA 14.1.1. witSAW ON UM PLANS 0/0404001010*100011707000007074004000401403 SILT PO. SAA. AAA Voss . 1100. SS altr S,Irf.gr rrtp141 ..nrrISMAS Sttr A .....rglta LIV4%.AAMMIS ISM Mr. AA S.W. 7000(0, PASTMTION 7001 TONTRATIOR Site. M.A.. Mar IMMISTAWS Sar ALL Rosy. ST0. S.. Man AS HMO.. Too no on STA.A. Ann. 71004 MUT Ann... SMALL A.0 Az trona. . P.P.A. .r. VtgLittlAIM11,71r,f2=.774,12,CZWMT? ON VS A MOS P.M. A Am.. 171 304001040 OS MOT. 0'0100'000.07TATITTONT TVS LORTRATIOR mast xrott**ALrA nOlIntAar TAIRY.T Rows /70.1.04.0 71. Sr. TO MAMMA AA. Star na ir , AMR monsoon, Amu. A PPer TOWST 0700001000710400 041074107040 40601 000 TIST ps.. re .ns. MM. Or SILT ANT DOM OM. smears A Trolornis MOW R..' ar so. MP SWF rsorratasur DOIXTAN nor Mounts V. a. MR. souSt OT sta.. l'art IRAs 11./C. TOTSTS.ASTTOS £1(1. Iss .Anto WS O nor. 10030000 404 MOM es. PDX 277000 It MT Sin an nut Rota. 0=111,300037707AI040040070I03'0m •ff;;;Igad ant.. Or Mr MOM .. traroor a A.M. Mummer AN.0 noltren. nit 6.7.00. .1APTAIN Aratnraor 70000000000 nals RITZ AT ALT Max SST NOM 1I117N ASS ALTITS ROADIross Attorn.l. Inenflarrer TRATRACTOR S.11 A.A.P.S... AMS 0.0000 700004 00 Orn. 11.. Atellsrsdr PASSIM STATTATT NOW nonTrocts. TO ARMOR raarninst .icks ArASSAM 100r PIM ALTNTST SIDSZ AT REAM PITATTLUTTSIS STSIS M.P. $ S.M. rantortton anelattor ITT ITSTPTTLisr Ms. Tois mourn a. orstonon To start. Ape LALL*AirrrA outs AAM sur . TITS TWO. 010,181000 AND EROSION CONTROL PLANS I 0707001000 Start CONNE,TiON— 1"0104003ga00f7r00874u. WOW St.. SORT. tOnsHeo satORN P-LAN FLEW AY CONAHOTtot TO STOTait „SAWS 0700330 „„--STOT. 01*101 40.00.0 NS.. PVC 0.0 00401 SI. AMP rrpa AS IMASHOIPt - ARCIORNTAS ROARTROCTION tar 0 ,....0:: .. 1* 4,! : I ....* ...... a ... ..... . i •• • 1..11.4- 07TTANGSI00 PLAT. SOT. 1:1111,11: . ..... Or SOUL THAT. -0 . .ONA. Onto. 70100001000 RAMA AZIOXIIIR r ster T.PORs. ft Memorriar ra sr.!' THAT Wont Amy. FM. SOOTT. Or Arm CONsTRETTT. our 1040109000040000407400107000017301010)70/ A. SARAH ant PR. Dre A. SUMACS Jur** ITASOLTRanoss or MS LASr 000 TT.. ono saleSTaTOS 00700104001030100000000000 702 SWAT W. 37410100700007 Mr SAVAMIA. NAT.. Or A. ...,71Hor ArrosattAT offeron . Snots ins.. =men RM. 04 0410 40741 ernarnat IV 4 Strnor AAR cortnnn. or nor nom. or TM SIO. RAT nostronART OA M.... rtratonorr sts 0.40,7 nor AAA awn Vs.. tralkator Ontalsofter S.T. 000117070070000070400 310700 MIT. .0 0063,3. Dar LOTS C ) TO Nat TO TOSITSIZSITS .rns Art nowt.. RM. tt Rm. API. AOtr. 001l00000404,40100001700007400040)0,701fl/ Atm, ILLIAALT***Avr .A0sts AtftAs AMAT . WM AS MM.. TO War SCSA Ann. our of to tar IAA. rtsas AMA Ma carrar.... Totria. T.T sonslas Trot sr. Ms rnauttrrar ars. 00 arnannatos 0000037107101 RRALL »Pomo** TAW AMMIL ant. 00100,000140000 Ha Manse A. strousores. ROO.. ..notts. ASO sTa4.t121( =Tata Sla Oar.= Arm, HO .1.1 AA Net. Sr Mt V. Ana.. Ps Mows Or A. arras's, nor . Aga.. Ant TATT SAT OS SYSTOTTITT Eta OP rt. MS... **um Apron* MINDMONS Nor Ant.. as a..t,ran OP WITHIN n Antos or annrscan. max Attar IR A VMS ran R.T.R. SsiS VaRT Orlertroto AT sottrosontrt 8-07-Hrs 's RICAROAL Mr MAMMA mos PARA. =PA. or ALS non. Conn. lonstArt sTisattArS On Mt. ono OS. AMT.. zwra.stro APPAL,. ALL NV. LT... Ats stIts Awn AO Stn. T.st ..4.10 STSTPXSO OTT r. SIMIS Isms Ain satin .ssOus Alat. Tar sox. 14.nass TO sm.. StOOTH Tow .A. stasa. Assro. T. Rms. Tun,. Sara So. Os sos AS MWEIAM1 00 03000 MT TOMTIT. OUTS TO MS .tivern. stuts 04 10000 nrorre Str. MTV, 177010/00011)0107 181 TORS AM. Ma r..A tromvs. Orr TYPTITUSTOR .ALS Ann. Snot Jrvea Darr PASSIMIS. mals.. AA. ITTO.U.0 MP. T. STORY SAWS snort Stentort .ft MR. SKILL At roLeurtzLA rains. A. Ast.. 4* pis, /MASA OM.. .0 onosanInap SR not otr.T auss. TARA, NAT nom. As rla ra A sur Ara Inotrornos secants. In riff WS TO *Prif OUST e IMAMS olDavr ITTROLL LpArtms vs*. Az at par..* as MAR nor. int SIAM= tOnnosa Arra.. Br AU U. A.M. N.D. Art SOr oTILHAT A.Ass na. Trott. ANS nrs....11. IMAMS OM. I I GRADING AND EROSION CONTOL PLANS Call 48 Hours before digging: NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or 0011811.corn Common Ground Alliance Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Savona 2,P20151010064A3 noe 03/28/13 Sheet 16 OF 23 Details tva***ateAvoodyLcom 90/030 Lake Elmo, Minnesota 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc $0. 1141.417.' rt,”iya.v 011774010181140034 1103120 7030 CovsTIISATIO gartetr=41; CURTAIMS aur Sr Mt fIrr 0.11410a wag..7.-"x,r7a- '141r= . IMSMOttiNad AMR A MAMA,. Idndk rwr wes mar ALL'ItimmVX LIVIAT 70 tlettR anal -MA 100773 15 CONSI,Cnt MtIMPZILMAAMid AMR al. MVO AND SaY10 Ver. 441(37*07100740113130121117 a. -tan AFTIST ORM' At NNW CoVe1017 r0.0171. 04.0 WV SVLID Mt, 31510000 07 03110074038310 MINIAACT WITS MPG IttC01.0701., 1 WOK ears, 01 010r41280 MUACISIIT re) ,C00, .sMatn. PAULO"' TO INIVAle COIC03+15' 141017401t7 °A.M. trtnt” PROAts ,r0CM.117FS C LNG AND EROSION CONTOL PLANS NISH. 30.110181 Mrai SEM.= EVAVE=1,1-47,--- F leffgre, FhlifY130::"t 00"714720114,4700wo" WatwoodWattufaut WNW., tora 01311770134,011407400 461937-6154, 70* 952-0.17-6822 10. Oka 11400007,9100 wuwwwwwwwedtwcwie PRZSMICIt 2014110330 Albte JUIN 8 tiVC,IS 00030(3 CONIVIUillie 70 'Msgr. SO, Aviv, STOW ,ZWAR 103,100 41 778847170 HIMEIN ANS MANTON 00710 rrktrr CONSILIVICTIOM IS COMPLETED 3 414M.Z.L.SILLArilirtslige ILEMhet NtEDED DR REWIRED d RE1E00A7100 MORK SliALI, 0t00: fOrtillt 1 3.00 OF INA C.RAPIhe 03 A lerktki, DP .8 SOWS Of SOD 010.401 BE MAC= RAMC., 00 "Nr cr 7*341 0201.17 ad.1 0004204005 :MT St NAM, PlIaCTI, REHM ME (14D 1014010001131 ran' STAMM. DMUS 0 1301LEVARD .0,1 pars RWCAATNA tNettIttra: FIAT MOLY2, WHAT INCLUDXS 1107 Stilinlit 07 0019041 0100004417 0311. CHUN., WILK MAINPRIVINC PAL-17,1, MOM. 5'1TE RESTORATION PLANE farerirEar,A"` UM), LAS.EittNE 1,11a FROPEArr tat I 1-il..•=t;,.i=r.2• 70R708+41100Sr01,- , Sik LIMIII, I *AM ,TVIMCE PIK II HNH'wer SVC.' Maga, - I lianea, oacUy that We plaa Facanid male 1mi - &tux arporvidna mad that I bat dm/7 Itosoed FIKPIRISM. RIGDOPM °maw tha lam al dm Deo of %Lima Ryan M. 131tilin nem 06/14/13 L4lNa, 41257 SAMMIRT S Ibresicoars 031(1 r-seteco 10741. MCI MST 0N110 ITHICLE/CIINSTRUMOY n•ornal WO. 0037 Aorz -SILT ?Mt Int111,01.19,1 341470 1007000 tal 1100011003 7771 L'f/12 MLR FEPPra/CONSTRIal'aM 10147717, TYPE AI. ALL OMR LOGrikla • lortuaLs SHALL COMFORM ITS vApp sp. PROM, LINE fo. AdirM7 21-10 'l "0.• nettati 444%-721144 •iiAajtaat 173Z11 IROLL SIMON 40,4630as 410440! 1,4XXSTRZAli WE Er SET PAWN IOW - MCI= TX. DM NOT PAW WEN ITO MTN EMT, TROY /IS MU Anwar ,1 0 crl.tAgrAVNAVV.1;ffi%';.74=1,". 1171000 1115-23 DA APPROVED EQVAL „,--..DEntfillMi Man' rIZTela,;„frr"" " 70717 0" 1111714 iustivewr CtIltS — litati-Mit HIGH DAV FABRIC ALUCO CO-23 LHOH-FLON OR APPROVED COAL ,Aittl•S Wt. F trn t Mtn ...an stre 0113*9/ PIXontfUlTED fP•Cf 1,7,0 }Mat' t, t Ititttat IMitt stst 4043. .17101 4.1lititta ater favr..1. .14,10 }MU. 1,11.17I • 1,11M14.1. 31, 424.r 1,14• MOP, tt9r1- g OW4 — .Y2 Mgr ••....101 Mt AO' 1.-.800.10 COMI tx Mt .a. ld•AST,IR &SF, a. SI trial CW410. Yrakle • te •C‘Orta..9 PitilltEtt W." tt 1)1 SUR1141. ANAVAIR-af Mr IT... Set.neilacma tatd 0.11. P.0% 11) OM LIP, ttt 41713(MVS t gt, JAVttttytt, AAar Atqamto At tat WV PttAIS WV.. tFttrtilt MOM X AUXIAIM 0.10701 07 C0007000713?/0/87240110124 far ° A.P.S.r.ialaVV.71713,:tg.65XligmC 7111 wetut 01 ONSTRUCTION AWSRAMT 1101030701001L0 MEV MIT manweriox pr5 NSW SM.. 1.0.1MICTION 10 aWSTRUCTION ENTRANCE ooLt. or 4)40010110.0 TO PREITAT titiCAING 00'1378 ANN) SOIXWAYS. MO ANON PRAILLP I'MAT 41100 07011101 PKAIOD, cop fmVSSINC Watt ADDIMMIAL 0000 DR REMOVAL AND XXIMSULLarla* Pr ?Mr 01X1r FM112.11,C£ 0)REEDU tom AND maw ER610 Alep 'CHICLY' IINNRCARMACE MIR 1.0 LEAVING TN, so'f£ 48 Hours before digging, NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Savona lake Elmo, Minnesota 20-'21,1€11'Pra dog DO= 03/28/13 short 17 oF 23 Details 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc —8 into -- riVid 016 - 0 0,0 C, 0 g.ggs — 00 0 too oi-ra vO(0 in cd 0 0 00 . 0 0 003 00 00 00 O rsli a, 00 CS Mr , 0 0 0 0 IM o 0 0 0 M M 0, 0, t100 4 M M ?r, c, 00-0 7,5ZE,p'2,1}V 2.33 26 25 24 23 22 21 20 19 18 17 16 15 14 13 12 11 577-/ STREET NORTH 1075 1070 1065 1060 105.5 1050 1045 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 47 72* i ;I - gig OCR Oirri ra 00 CO 0 0 0000 0 0 0 0 m 0 t, 0 700 0 0 7030 roivi 700) im rig -, 0 0 n 00 CI 0 00 00 00 00 8 8 ZIOAD 83 VC 00 8,8 00 700-3 00 0 07)31) ot 00 ce)', 070 00 8 R 0- M 70003 66 70(0 7, 700-70 rt .8 0 ggelgi00 10 00 7 0 -3- - m 1009 02211 V -a, ol r-,, 00 00 0 0 nP Ilf 1,35.76 AU Hr.. ,521tra 6 0 CSO 5 0 0 0 00 0 Ca 00 t„, • 74 glng gg..81gg' aeaea 4 IN .- 0 0 8 8 5 46 45 44 43 42 41 40 39 38 37 36 35 34 33 32 31 30 29 28 27 26 25 Wast.oact Proftakotal SORVidet, 3�70A)33)0272070& tAN 600 kendei al, a elde la a peva lay las cm ma my muyaryla a doe I ma • al, head P11001961C•04. IMMIX ear do la a/ Ow *ma al lama. - Fervadvaa 5TH STREET NORTH Prepared for PAM& RM C.d.& Drowte HW Record D1Wt*- ra, 74072*0073,0) 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 10_05 1000 990 985 980 pL_75 970 965 \ 960 / '955 950 945 940 2 1 0 Call 48 Hours before digging: 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona 200300' 20'2'1RICTFOR crow 03/28/13 sbe,•t 18 OP 23 Preliminary Street Profiles PtiONE 40-0,00 0M0,00 000031,0 .007-00 waftweseoreg,dp."0, Ryno M. BMus ows %/14/13 LiattiOlt 1,ir 41257 groTgezg =71-4: Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 1 Ace Elmo, Minnesota e2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc Call 48 Hcurs before digging. 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4, 0 00 050 005 00 *0 0 0 0 0iQ -0 C 0 O. 0 109V4' tttt00 SAN cod 10 KS 0 0 ;'. C; ova oun o'o 00 •150 0 0 0 0 150 5150 10 00 0' 0 0 0 •-• 1090 1085 1080 1075 1070 1065 1050 105 105.61 104; 1040 10_35 103C 102; 102 101 2 1095 so at 1 Oa00 afgr 1085 1080 1075 1070 1065 1080. 1055 1Q60 1045 1040 bt, bt f`, 0 0 r; '1;3 00 tr.1t1111, 1030 2 Proftsional Serviced, ht. 769,3tabytary Orb, EY,. era.; Ntbd 5504 0140455 555250,5150 FAX 40 .31 5572 MURREE .1.8,17-0 4 5 6 7 00 SAN 4 - 05 01, 00 8 t" 6 STREET B I &N., candy thee thY pima me ppm, by mob by oda. my Edna orpreakaa tabad I asx • Ably Ilenr•O PICYZEGIONAL INCLYEEZ mb5.• Inn of Mem lemma Ryan M. Bluhen Cat- 06/14/13L. Ns 41257 Rerfattaux 05/17, Ftn,er5,tiorr.rnelll 04/4p1Rowe. C'Y C50^^.(1 tbv.;; vb;stc .;;;; ++9 Vea 00 0 DV v; 00 04500 cnicv 0 0 00 VICO 00 se 0 0 10 00 '50, cent' 5404 00.: ^-,e- -a- ,a- -s * -,,-,a. 00 CO 00 oo 0555 V7*. 0 00 rod ck 00 , 10,25 , aa.*4 , 55) and 5540 ;ato 42005 „ 8 „ al, 0 v14:5 0- 0 '1" A. rO“Xl K «1441 455 5 8 6 Om 'AA 1100 1095 1090 _1085 1080 1075 1070 1065 1060 1055 1050 1045 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 c!, m ,. cy, 0 ui raciS 0trz onn 00 00 STREET A 1095 15 05 1090 0 1085 1080 1075 _1070 AD55 1060 1055 1050 _1045 _1040 _1035 1030 10 11 05 I 1. 5414 Crocked:000000 Draw. ICH Rboani Ore.. bytda. Prepared f or. 1100 10 1090 1085 10 101 r'g 1051 ov:t 0 0 0 0 344) 00 1300 '4 89 t rt. 5 1100 1.0_95 1990_ 1085 1080 1075 F. 1070 t 1065 6 I . _ 1060. 105, ,- 1055 1050 ,1050 1045 1045 1040 1040 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 STREET B Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mirumesota, 55446 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota a' 1ST 21111 300' 2Z211610703 dr.g. 03/28/13 sh..* 19 OF 23 Preliminary Street Profiles wwweermtwoodps... Is 2013 Westwood Professional Seri,' roes, Inc 1080 10-7 1070 1065 1060 1055, 1050. 1045- 104Q 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 33.13 1 2 1070 ,,J rn 0,t, -,- 01 ,,,,. 0 OA 1330 ',191 00 00 400 .114 00 4 5 STREET C 9- 109 '001 0 10 1065"2,' is: 0 cs.4 C.' 0 00 00 00 0. 1060 1055 1050 1045 10401, 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010, 1005 1000 2 us rin °to riece ri-tiii.: 1-,6 se ..0- ,,c- . 00 C 0 1080, --4: c0 -. . 1080 107 zt 00 ,-- c,--: '-' co 00 00 -,... 00 1075 1070 3 1 ; r.i 1070 1065 1065 106Q CL)10 1055. 1055 1050.\ 10_50 1045 \ 8 E _ 1045 1Q4Q 1040 1035 1035 1030 1030 1025 1025 1020 1020 1015 1015 1010 6 7 8 0 01 r, 010 01, 00 AA Lt, 9-1'- a, to 00 00 00 00 00 00 5 1070 1065 1060 1055 1050 1045 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 STREET E 1 2 1040 0 0(21 10351',`,, 1030 1 02, / 9- 119- 1 0_2Q 4 00 .1429 f '1r1 00 r.... 0 r,.. CA- 1341r 09'. 130 ,r tri *......., 29,-, ,..1e1 00 00 00 00 .-0-- r 0 €10 r 100, reArr 811 s, .13 / /429 3(14 g E 6 7 8 9 10 11 1040 000 1035 00 1030 1020 1015 1Q1Q 1005 1005 1 2 3 4 6iritiE STREET D 1030 tCt 01 ir.: in 29 ,) 0 .1.., N 9-13 0 0 0 0 ,r1 0 11 0 0 re) 1210) r 0 c 0 —0 04t'l 00 00 00 00 00 00 ,--- .— ,--cc — -,— re 0 r ,24101, (721 Call 48 Hours before dry ging 811 or cal1811.com 1080 Common Ground Alhonce _1075 1070 1065 1060 1055 7- 1050 2 z 1045 1040 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 0, 0 1 02t.fn' r.", Cr 0 0 0 0 "-.1 0 0 r.,) 0 0131 rs. 0 01 (r, — 0 (7, 921- '03 12 CC, 00 0 0, 00 cPs a, Of 4,1 a) in 0, 0701 1130 OS Cr, 01 611:13 51407 47111 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 990 985 980 975 970 965 1 2 4 5 6 7 8 STREET G 11, 09r1,11 0 0.0 r 000 1030 9- 4403 c() 1025 0105 1, CP 1020 1015 1010 t A A 1005 _1000 995 990 985 980 975 970 965 10 11 12 13 200 300 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona Lake Elmo, Min* newts 500' 20121161DTA0-1.1",,1 DOW 03/28/13 Shea 20 oF 23 Waft...4 Praha/anal &mks, 1. 7)13143433312929 0,0,10,10,f1N 51.1. PHONE 02-131.1150 140 *001040 10/01t4 01144037-1150 wirot.westoroodoccont 1 11•3•1,, away V. &le lato wroa poverat b., me c• maw my rlhca scar.. slmel 11. 1 sx• rhe/T Iremond 1111011.116510N3IL - rcjnS. Imr• 01 due geff.4 IMMOEN. Ryan M. Blulun 06/14/13 N, 41257 OEM Rerfsiona 33.1 Omm13)4 Pansuni Corrt,ritut brklate Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Mirumesots, 55446 Preliminary Street Profiles c 2013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc. Wasevand 6 Sandal. Inc. 064,110447004a/a. Ohm Pe:414l, MN 54. PHONE 952,37 -OVA API 992 1.07-5/122 TOO 1-RXX- ,aata931,5190 vewaammawacdpacorn 04 1 470 1060 1050 1045. 1040 1035, 1030 1025 1020 1Cra,5. 1010. 1005 1000 99_5 990 985. 980 975 970 965 960 955 950 1 01 0 1 00 1000 2 040 1004 <T.; o, -C sot aada 990 e 51i i 980 975 970 965' .47 Ct Ott 04 0 0 Ott cr, tat- , 74 :O0 a r—, 0 00 5 6 04 C*04 ., 4, 00 8 2 11) a5 as; nr CI, 0, 1ca '2000 M CP 0 al 11--- CO Ol PO Cc ar Ocora O 414 IN d , CO a) Fa aa as 1./I 0 0 Os O1014 Oa O1 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 0/Heti F 1010 10Q 1010 100Q _1005 1000 995 990 98_Q 985 975 980 97_Q 'a a 975 965, 970 960' 965 955 1 2 3 4 5 STREET H I hmby cerot, tho wit• latgand wa dim my sfact 4.1 tt. I tap • dttly b191.01tIrel(ANAL .61413ill vat. the Ir., of Si Sao d Masc. Ryan M. Muki.co Date 06/14 /13 LIceso• No 41257 Rota*. 995 990 950, - 011/17/13 flIrvto. Pe, GI/ 77,047,0, 04/74045 Re,f++ M- .111 .1°1'1'1. at- 4/04 at 20 0 0 2 2 0-44 Car Ol t.nun Ire-c---Ta faa SPA .1 a. MOO 1./1 fak aaal '007000 4 04 al 0 ao 5 0 7"at- CD 0'" ,so ,r, c? 0 .. 74, 0 t"; .2) ;2 t't1 ;70 "; 0 t.; ttt} 0007 ,,,,,r11 " CP 0 0000 2, 01 0 0 110°6505 1055 1050 1045 1040 . 1035 1030 1025 1020 1015 1010 1005 1000 995 990 985 980 975 970 965 960 955 950 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 04 co CS, . 'It CA . ttt t, , ;; tt't ttt't '47 0 tt; 04t6 on r-;;: ,,i, 7-00; I, t, . 4; .. 00.71 47t0 4007 0700 att 0 0.04 t f, vt. 00009 7070 , at, 0 at 8,17, 1010 'gas g.,gg gggg 1000 995 99_o 98_5 980 975 965 a. a 960 955 950 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 1/ smEET Prepared for Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnnesota, 55446 Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota Coll 48 Hours before digging 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Adionce NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 100' 200' 201211600TP4. 0,9 03/23/13 Shmt 21 OF 23 Preliminary Street Profiles 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc £ HONr 552.937-61641 r•nx 95.2-4fl a22. Mt Ma- 140.4:0,160 www.weawoodpumm �— 06Ji4 26971 alsal:} n^ Cny ca.�me.�ta Checked: Drams Prepared for: Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Minnneota, 55446 NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION Savona Lake Elmo, Minnesota Call 48 Hours before digging 811 or co11811.com Common Ground Alliance 2Crl 2,90FLP01 tlwn DKr 03/28/13 SbRo: 22 OF 23 Preliminary Landscape Plan 02013 Westwood Professional Services, Inc 4 4,1 e't 0' / '-5 44 1 0' 3404 11*52 35s' Westwood ProfautanalServfotAlnr- ittEt AREamo ELIAo or.H3L.HREEEHE RHONE 952.370190 Mix 952-437-SW2 7011, rel-E 1,41. OA 14003 7.16.1717.01.1.0.1 02 EHTHEt ELSE, m: ( 958 3 — .1%0Yesi • • ...... ... .,,,,,,,,... .. Alitritiv.• Obit., Atti e., T4 vAffirt, .... -mt- , • . or riiv ... ' r 4 - ,'' vo I k \ sea 986 •64444 4=t87 d, plon .71...7 fo ned Ow on2 6 1.671176[617. 61711117/ST par dot. al 6.7 Geolo of 1.1.oto Coy Meyer 06/14/13 Dow Liam. ETH 26971 0041.016 1 ITyatilesett PITAVTI: Armed Draw)s, 44/A086 DECIDUOUS TREE PLANTING Landscape Requirement Calculations F--- PRUNE ,OUT EASOIRECTtO BRANCHES (ROLIDE ONE CEN TR M. LEADLR Ortt,It AND StARINS AF, 054514360. tct 11.',E. El) YEAH CAT ALL DECIDUOUS AND CZNIESPOSS MtEEST / TGP STAKES 5ABOTS GRCu40 (EA/ ) OF` rTmET GRANO, BCTLCE Or STATE 3' ChAN ) BELOW GROUND SAT, TIG POSTS TO GE 2M2" STAINED HOOD CR PATTLTED STEEL DELINEATOR POSTS. PLACE POSTE EOM:DISTANT ARCANE.) AND SETDOE ROO' SALL SECURE TREE TO POSTS IhtTot LDNG POLYPPOPYLENE OR PC 55181514454 40 ES I 5- YOE STRAP 3--P1A0E EIULCH. DEMIT .31 SmEGFIED, CASH PLANT PtTs DO NCT FLLE AGAINST EMMY: RCRE. a' DEER WATERING BASIN ETACKMILL PLANT Pit WITH smEcalED SAME/LL SCAT SLAPS, SITtES ARE, HOTm-AT oF BOLE REFER TO tmERK:te, STANDARD FOP NURSERY STOCK -FOR EIREANN+ BALL MEE ROETT FLARE TO 9E PLANTED AT OR NEAR FINISHES ORO/INCLINE SET ROOT BALL (HI UNDISTURBED S4,8S4-)T GR ,SOMPACTED SOIL HOHNO MAtCHiNG TREES MATURM. GEOUNDUNE MTH FINISHED SITE GEMS N.T.S EVERGREEN TREE PLANTING REASED OR.11•15,11 Preliminary Plant Schedule SYMBOL C0I4A0aN/BOTANICAL NAME CLLESTERY CRNAMET7T.AL E."/ERGRCEN ESC Salm Mope / Act. Mothorurn Aaiun -a Eton Motte Aco, x Tmerrono 4001' Hathwood MopIE / Eutmorn ST.LIam Hootsiocuot Sfeditao luoctrthoR Inemas 'SItvoM' Narthern Pa bog / Cuerom ell.ps0.to),5 Rai Ock / CuorruE robre 500nTi3 Hate 00- / OARFAUR boos BUY Oak / Querous macro -amp° Ho04,50(r3 / CHMLL mootetenioso Boulaord andort 3iIT0 oonaTmoo, 504,, ,or' Gmenspar Laden / TOio mrdmta 'Sreensal-a Matovery EIrn 1 UirnmE doMiam var loponico 3,,m0ver/ Ponceloo Eitn / Untus ornoncetto Pr nc030 t53 fTmeT Smot Botulo rHgro TOornieso CooRspur Hawthorn / c.Totomtmt, oroMMIT 'Imorms. Japanese Troe Lliot Synnoo rot culoto 74 Maly SerLoceborry Ammtanchm §0Eva 444'ite30,r4' itirch (tituit popuisfola 'Mita:pot; Proinefirm Slob Motu, 3:MarlefITL" ProTumon :Sat / Mao, nProiLsETHA .3E,Hoq. Snot Crob / Motu, "Spong Snow' 065 EIT.3,1„ SpET,o.E. / Pl000 mlOoco derma° Go!orodo Green SLmoce Rae° pungeos 8024400 PinuT nitro Wormy Ram / Pam; reanom Sooten / Enos sylve3to4, WTHE Poo / Pat, strobso Coll 48 Hours before digging 811 or cal1811.com Common Ground Alliance SI2E, 25 BEI 2 5' BE 2 3'' BE 2 5' BE 25 EE 25 BE 25 5E 2 TT' EP 25 ES =_T EP 20) GB 2 O' BEI 2 .5" Be BB r2,41,.P 588 '' 6' 3' 2' 4', 89 OLOMP 1 5 ES Ft.' BE tt"65 41. tei 6' HT, 69 6' H° , EB HT , Be 5' H7, ea 6' H,84 6 HT, Be LA29 NOTE 2/L4,4T/ TIES ON PLAN SUPERSEDE UST CLIANTIPES IN THE EVEt.T QF A DI.S.CREPANSY PRUNE CaT *AT:DIREC(ED BRANCMES PROVIDE ONE CENTFAL LEADER / ,—CHTINC; AND STAKING AS REOLIIRED. FOR-O.:E 0) TEAR OR ALL / DECIOLTLJS ANC CON'EEPCMS TREES / TOP SLAKE'S A804E. CROUND / (MAX) OR TO FIRST BRANCH BOTTOM OF SIAHE 3. (MIN ) BELOW CPC,R,D STAKING POSTS lo BC :MET STAINED VEOHD ETR PAINTED 'STEEL CIELItaEAMME POSTS PLACE 3 POSTE EO,MSTANT AROUND ATID CTETSSE RCCII 80 GEGSRE PREE TO POETS VOTH ,et -LENS PCLIPMOP &ENE: OR PCIL rT.Tvi MINE. -30 MIL , I 5' MEE STRAP TREE tHAIE EATER/AL FROM GROONDLIME SEWARD TO FIRST BRANCHES, AS REMIRED T. PLACE HUCK DEPTH AS SPECIFIED OVER PLANT Rivs - ToT FELE ACIAINST TRIMo TORE Et' DEER WAFERING BASIN. SADRAILL PLANT Ha WTH 5PECIFIED BACKER., SOIL - SCAfRam SIDLE AND &MGM OF HOTS REFER TO AMEMoCAN STANDARD POt HOMERS STCGR FOP FAINEUM BALL FLEE nuar s.ARE. TO EC PLANTED A. OR 7IRAP RftlfRHEO GROJNO,NE EFT RCOT FIAT!. ON UNSTEM/RBED SUBSOIL OR COMPACTED SOIL MOLIND MATCHSTE TREES MAEUP.AL SRO/MORE -rtrn MIMEO SO'S DRADE N.T S LAST REASEO I4/07,t, LA28 LANDSCAPE REQUIREMENTS: SIX TREES PER ACRE X SITE AREA (112 6.) ,64'LIFIOHT EILEI,ELW = 676 TREES REQUIRED (676 CALIPER INCHES) 4TRE43T TREE R0QUIREMENTS: 2 TREES PER IGO LINEAL FEET STREET (31,329 LF) - 627 TREES REQUIRED ',Ai EAT1FER Mir 14 TOTAL LANDSCAPING PROVIDEIL O745,220E5PI ANTINGA cri tov (940 CALIPER INCHES) = 1303 TREES REQUIRED (1,616 CALIPER INCHES) = 1228 TREES PROVIDED (3,070 CALIPER INCHES) ••NCITES: • STREET TREE LOCATIONS AND SPACING ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE BASED ON CONSTRUCTED DRIVEWAY AND UTILITY LOCATIONS Prepared. for. Lennar Corporation 16305 36th Avenue North Suite 600 Plymouth, Min' rtnesota, 55446 Planting Notes I LTONTMACTOR SHALL CONTACT GOPHER 'CIES CALL' (5'I-454-0002 or 800-25'2 -1160 IAERLEY LOCATOTTS :IF At LINDERGRCur.t) UltUDES PRIOR TO 31.0.TAL.ATI0N OM ANY PLANTS CRI LANDSCAPE MATERIAL 2 ACTuAT, LOETAFON OF PLANT MATERIAL LE sueJect TIELI) ANfl SITE 3Gt:DITI01)5 E REAMING WLI. PE INSTALLEC LINTIL ALL ;PAWING AND )32.7)NS1RU1'1I0N HAS BEEN COMPLETED IF) THE I4,4EEDIA-1E, AREA 4 ITONTRAC7OP SHALL PR43IDE TYFD) YEAR GUARANTEE CF ALI PLANT MATERIALS THE GUARANTEE BENINS ON THE GAYS 0: THE LANDSCAPE ARITHDIET85 OR 8:AMER'S WRIT FEN ACCEPTANCE TTE THE INITIAL pLANTNIT PEP, ADEMEN T PLANT MATERIAL SHALL RAYNE A ...12NE YEAR GUARANTEE COMMENCING IJPON PLAMTING 5 PLANTS Tr) MEE AmERI(AN STANDARD FCR NURSERY STOCK ',ANS' ZNO 1-2004 OR vOSI CURRENT VERSICN) RECUIREMENTS FOR SIZE AND TYPE SPECIEIED e TC BE !NslAtt ED AN PER LINLA 2.3 ANSI STATIO,ARD PLANTING T,RAO`TCES 5 PLANTS SHALL BE INVEDIATELY PLANTE'S UPC.. ARRIVAL AT SITE PROPERLY HEEL -IN MAIERIALS IF NECESSARY, TEMPOR ARN GN) Y le OPEN TOR RE BIIPLAP CN BB mATEF,ALS. REMOVE POT Crt PoTTED PLFANTS, RPLIT AND etEtrt APART PEAT POTS it P45N11E FA, AN -S AS NECESSARy PER STANDARD NURSERY PRACTICE AND TO 3'PPF73 RCDR BRANCHND OF EXISDNYI AND RPOROSED TREES 12 STAKING GE 154115 AR, REDLARE.D, REPOSTTEN, PLUMB AND STAKE Nnt PLUME 43148 DNE YEAR 15 PLE NEED rop 504. A4±4ENDMEN1S SHALL BE DETERtiotED. LIPC,(1 SITE. S)CIL 5/..-140t3IGNS PRIOR TO PLANTING) Lt41O5C,4cE CONTRACTOR SHAIL NOTIFY LANDSCAPE ARCH,TECT rraR THE NEED CS ANY SC). AMENDvENTS 14 EACEFILL SUL AND TL34S3IL TO ADHERE TJ 434/1101 STANDARD SPEtSEICAITCE. 35.72 (SELECT TOPSCli E1S,P,R044-) AND '3 054 ExiSlinra,' TOP SLUT FROM 000. FREE OE acra. ROCKS LARGER THAN CNE INCH, TABOOS, DEPPIS, AND LARGE 'ATEUS UNLESS OPEL:FIEF, OTHERWISE ATNILILIM DEPPF TCPSCIL FOR AIL LAWN GRASS AREAS AND 12 DERN, ICPSDIL POR FREE, SHRA)35, AND REFENN.ALS 15 MULCH '0 SE A" ALL TREE. sHatia, PERENN/A,„ AND MAINTENANCE AREAS TREE ANC SHFUN 1,4140 au's SrALL HAVE -E' DEPTH CR SHREOC,ED HARDWOOD MULCH SHREDDED HARDWOOD) MULCH TO BE NISED ARCIOND ALL PLANTS TAN TIFF' AREAS PERNENNIAL AND ORNAMENTAL GRASS PECS SHA)L HALE 2 DEITTH ,SHREODED HARDWOOD VDICH 121,24,354 TO NE FREE +251 DELETER)CUS MATERIAL 145 EDGING 10 2E SPADED EDGE, UNLESS DITHERWISE INDICAlED SPADED 510E TO PRDSYDE V-SHARED DEPTH ANL) 54131,1 TD CREATE SEPARATION BETWEEN 1.111L3.4-4 AND 143074" INDIVIDUAL TREE, SHRUB. OR 44A1N-CAR1,E4) BEDS TO BE SPADED EDGE. UNLESS NO1ED DIHERYGSE 7 ALL :DISTURBED AREAS TO BE SODDED OR SEEDED., UTILES:, 044HER6I5E NOTED SCL) TO NE STANDARD MINNESOTA CROwN AND HARDY PLUEGRANS MIN, EPEE CF LAWN WEsEDS ALL NisSOIL AREAS 10 BE RAKED TO REMOVE DEBRIS AND ENSURE DRAINAGE SLUES, OF 3 1 OR GREATER SHALL BL STAKED SEED AS SPECRTED AND PER 04744,01 SPESIEICATPDNE 18 RRovIOE PARGATICN TO ALL STREET TREE AND PUFFER LANDSCAPING) CN SITE REAR YARD AND OPEN SPADE PLANTINGS WILL NOT BE tREATGATED IRRGAtc,:: SYSTEM TO BE DESELSVDDILD BY LANDSCAPE CCNTRACTOR LANDSCAPE CONTRACTOR TC RROvIDE SHOP OPAYANCS TO LANIOSCAPE ARCHITECT FOR APPROVAL PRID,R TO INSTALLATION nt IRFIGA TICN SYSTEM GCNTRAD,TOR 113 PPCJVIDE OPERATION MANUAL>. AS- BUILT PLANS, AND NCRMAL PKICESRAMmir 10 SYSTE41 SEIALL BE :/ENTERIZED AND HAVE SPRING STARTNIP DUR1N0 FIRST TEAR CR OPERATIC:. SYSTEM SHALL HAVE ONE-YEAR WARRANTY' CS ALL PARTS AND LABOR ALL 14r-c4lFAtnal/ tectii INSTALLATION AND SCHEDELING CAN BE OPTAFINED FROM THE CZNERAL CGIITPACTOR IS CONTRACTCR SHALL PROVDE 4452555401 WATERiNG OF PLANT VATER ALS UNTIL THE PLANT IS EuLLY ESTABLISHED 011 RRIGATEIN SYSTEM IS OFF -RATIONAL CPANER tYLL NOT PROVDE 't:ATER FOR GCNTEACICR 20 REPAIR. RERLAcE, CP, PROVDE SCD/SEEE AS REQUIRED FOR ANY ROAEWAY NOLILEVARD AREAS AD./AGENT 82 THE SiTE DiSTDREIED CORING) CONSTRUCTION 21 REPA(11 ALE DAvAGE FRCRERTY FROM RLANTINC DRERAIETNS Al NO COSI TO ONNER NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION 2017116`PLPO2dA5 o 03/28/13 sheet 23 OP 23 Savona LaVe Elmo, Minnesota Preliminary Landscape Plan THE CITY OF I AKE ELMO 4.0.4stgieh'A,IV.Vremeargw. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: 8/06/2013 10 AGENDA ITEM: Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastnicture Improvements: 1-94 to 30th Street Accept Bids and Award Contract SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell. City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Ryan Stempski, Assistant City Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item........,.. ........... ..... ..... ....... ..... ..... .....City Engineer Report/Presentation ..... ..... ..... ........ ...... ....City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff__ .................... ....... ..... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate.... ..... ..... ....... ......... ...... „ .... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion.,..,..............., ......... ..... ............ ...... ,...,Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ......„................ ......... ...... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: 'The City Council is respectfully requested to consider accepting contractor bids as presented and awarding a contract for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30`11 Street. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-59, Accepting the Bids' and .4 warding a Contract to Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of $3,463,201.60, for the Lake Ehno Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 10 Oh Street. STAFF REPORT: Bids were received, publicly opened, and read aloud on July 23, 2013. The city engineer has prepared and attached the Tabulation of Bids and a Letter of Recommendation for the award of the contract. The City received four (4) bids for this project, with Minger Construction, Inc. providing the lowest base bid in the amount of $3,463,201,60, The Engineer's post -design construction cost estimate for the project was $3.3 million, excluding a 10% contingency. The project remains within the budget amounts established with the project authorization. Minger Construction, Inc. is a known contractor having successfully completed similar projects in the Metro Area. The city engineer is therefore recommending that the Council award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Minger Construction, Inc., as outlined in the attached letter. Minger Construction is coordinating material lead times and is planning to put 2 to 3 crews on the project to meet the substantial completion date of December 20, 2013. The Contractor has communicated a balanced bid and is prepared to deliver the project per the plans and specifications. The City Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30`h Street, on May 21, 2013, and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids. The Project was advertised on QuestCDN.com, Finance and Commerce, and in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review in accordance with the Minnesota Competitive Bidding requirements. The improvements include: • The Village lift station located_iust north of 30th Street and east of Reid Park, consisting of a 12-foot diameter concrete wet well, two 1,200 gallon per minute submersible pumps; electrical/SCADA control panel, chemical feed odor control system, standby generator, and lift station site work. • Directional drilling (trenchless installation) of 16,250 feet of 16-inch forcemain along 30th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue to a location just south of Cimarron. • Open trench installation of 4,140 feet of 24-inch diameter trunk sewer pipe from the southern edge of Cimarron to Hudson Boulevard. The project is the first phase of a multi -phase plan to bring municipal sewer service to the Village area by constructing a lift station, forcemain and trunk gravity sewer line. The improvements are necessary to convey wastewater from the Village area, along Lake Elmo Avenue to the MCES meter station located on Hudson Boulevard. Trunk gravity sewer pipe will be installed in the area south of 10th Street to make sewer service available to future development in the 194 east corridor area. The project need is documented in the city's 2030 Comprehensive Plan and has been programmed in the 2013 Capital Improvement Program. The total "post -design" engineer's estimate of project cost is $4.5 million vs. a CIP project budget amount of $4.9 million. FUNDING: The project will be partially funded from the $1.0 million DEED Sewer Grant. The state's obligation to fund the DEED Grant shall terminate if the entire Grant has not been disbursed by December 31, 2014. The remaining project costs will be funded through the issuance of bonds with the debt retirement to be funded through the collection of Sewer Availability and Sewer Connection charges established by the City. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve Resolution No. 2013-59, thereby accepting the bids and awarding a Contract to Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of $3,463,201.60, for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30th Street. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-59, Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of $3,463,201.60, for the Lake Elnw Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 30" Street." ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No. 2013-59 2. Engineer's Letter of Recommendation and Tabulation of Bids 3. Project Schedule 4. Project Location Map 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-59 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE LAKE ELMO AVENUE SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS: 1-94 TO 30T11 STREET WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law. and bids were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, bids were tabulated, checked and summarized to verify that all requirements of the submittals were met; and WHEREAS, the project engineer reviewed the bids and has provided a letter recommending the award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, Minger Construction, Inc., in the amount of $3,463,201.60. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract in the accordance with the above ordered Project, in the amount of the Contractor's lowest responsible bid, and according to the plans and specifications thereof approved by the City Council. The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adarn Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-59 *w�dqr Rreet, Suitem00 Saint mu,wwmam 651.292-4400 July 25.2013 Mr. Ryan GtempskiPE City ofLake Elmo 38O0Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Re: Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: (-94to3DmStreet City cfLake Bmo, Minnesota City Project No. 2O13123 TKDAProject No. 152D4.[01 Dear Mr, Sterripski: A tabulation of the Bids received by the City for the above mentioned project an July 23, 2013 has been completed with the following results, A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information, Contractor Base Bid Alternate No. 1 Alternate No, 2 MingerConstruction, Inc. Northwest Asphalt, Inc, Nodhda|aConstruction Company, |nu, Eureka Construction, Inc. Engineer's Estimate Recommendation $3483.201,60 $3.080.192.81 S3'755.480.94 $3.957.505,34 $3.207.820.00 We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Minger Coostrwotion, inn. for their Base Bid. excluding Alternate Nos. l ond2. nf$3'4G3.2O1,60. Please donot hesitate hzcall mewith any questions o/comments you may have. Roneld3, Quanbeok, P.E. Project Engineer RSQhnan Enclosure 8 88 66666666,,66666666 88888 666666,,66660)66600 88,898888888 66666666666666666 8888888.8 ci 6 0 to to 6 82 8 Z. P 82, P „ 888888. 8I''741888,,ro " g 888555 66666660)666666666666666666666666666666 .P44T12.7'4 88588888 66666666666666666666666666666666666666 88888882888 888888 ,§U?: 8 0.00 88888888 .8.8888 c3j,WM •.4.n:§n 8888888888 ,ge,8glgog8sg,, ,m, mmo 6666666666666666 66666666666666666666666666666666666666 8888888, 8 8 8 8., 8888%, 4,74,§3i4-71P6- , 85 f,11,4AW 66666666666666666 66666666666666666666666666666666666666 , 888888888888 4-1 § rg ,8888 84-64-8 8555885585558885855585 66666666666666666666666666666666666666 66666666666666666 666666666666666666666666666056666666666 888 8. 8 8 8. 8 8. 8 I.588 0,4,T;F; 888888888888888.8888.8%;15?,,, • 0 6 0 di ui 8 6 8 g 888,r,8 o 6 6666666666666666 VT 6 6 6 6 6. 6 O 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6. 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0, 6 0 8 86 5 8 8 N 2 • SAHrTA 41 89 I‘t ;gggg:C-i - „ "2.0 0' :.-1 'A 'A 'Ai gf 00 0 5 TABULATION OF BIDS LAiJE ELMO AVENDE SEWER IF0r0A0T0123TUFlE l'ATIsoNCYCNTS - 154 TO SCNIII STPFET CITY OE LAKE ELMO: '2".75r3057 CITY PROJECT TY.DA PROJECT NO.15204401 3105 OPENED; J1.17Y 23. 7015 2.00 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN 8105885 CALCULATION 1. TKDA ITEM NO. ITEM Engineer's Estimate Unit Price Eureka unit F,Moi,neger Cens-tructIon UNIT 0,74iA5P:TY s Unit Price Total Amount 1.("9!6.00.09 $ UnitNP7iches4.451: C7"Tli:t4:16$0,00 39 TRENCE STABILIZATION ROCK Jr 500 5 2000 $ 3,Orci.00 5 25.00 5 ibt1.47,5100.00 $ 9,082.00 5 D.55 $ 2,497,55 $ 32.00 $ 4C T.ELEVIS-ING LP 2.00 51.25 5 41 EOR17.0NTAI. DIRECTIONAL DRILLING BORE. PITs LS, 160,505,e0 5 340,000,00 $ 340,000.00 5 lci0,000 00 $ 1.2.57.:0067601105 $5 255.734611203605 :55 3,7284&56:.3;347451,:9007: 7 $ 150.000.00 $ 9,417.45 SUBTOTAL DIVISION 2 3.soom $ 2,9353:0850::0000 s 5,250:ino Ss 3,514,445.30 DIVISION 3- WATE.101,41N 1,124,25 5.14010:0000 $ 3'1265'8,100: $ 1 5"XS2 LyEr TAP (I rd CLu DE SLEEVE AND VA1VEJ EA 7 $ '33,712 35.00 5 1,750,00 $ 35,667.00 5 2 t3' DIE, Cr. 5.7 WATERMAN J.EI 282 $ 41,Z:00°4' 55 131:92570e:0%9 $s 1.,44:c4:„000 $s 16,810.00525°°° ; 37417.45 $ 31;417714:4256 S5 3 6" RES, SEAT' GATE VALVE & 50X FA 1 $ 2,50,o_po S 4 5'1 97725ANT ‘?.'-E' r'-'.1's1 EA 1 5 3,500.00 5 3,575.00 5 31:8471$0:0000 Ss 21,800.66 SUBTOTAL DIVISION 3 $ 21,670.00 S.50 $$ ALSO 5 2 6' 14 . : 4$: 5:277 1. ' 5°'a a'°0 $5 $ 11:23197:5?ap 42S.00 5 s5c, $s 27,343.Cil 467.50 5 DivISION 4- sturrs & RrsTo. P anorq ii,..742n04:mtac s$ Kist° $ 156rsass Ss 55:CCOD : 1 SAWCUT ISTONNIDUS PAVCMENT Lc 95 S 175 5 2 REMOVE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYP.P 3, sIZES) LF 500.00 S 5.00 $ 1,0scano 5 2.90 i 1'31470°9 $5 1,750.00 $ 9 SALVAGE & REINSTaLt. WOO9 WIER EA 1 5 3509sra°1,,00Q: $SS 1,700.00 $ 62,50 $9,76 2550 70000 2902O : 55,03' S 1,300.00 6,507:0°0° 4 REIVIOV & DISPOSE OF EXIST 9171:59-4cl;/9 PAVEMENT, 0 RIVES SY 120 $ 2.50 $ 300.00 $ 2.60 $ 3 81 71 : 02 50 5$ 52.'5°00 ; 6 REMOVE 3, ISSPOSE OF EXIST Stm.sMiNOSCS PAVEMENT, STREETS SY 75 $ 3.25 $ 15.40 $.5 5,OCK1.00 5 6 REMOVE & 015P05E OF EXIST. CONCREL E 0.35 3, GUTTER LE 20 53.55 5 77 00 S. 7 LEFT STATION SITE GRADING LS 1 $ 5,000.00 5 10,000.00 $ 10,500.00 S 21,600.00 5 7$20.5,40 5$ 6,500.00 5 26,424.00 32,;..9008 5$ 4170 55 s CL.S. AOSPJFGATC BASF TN 15.00 $ 16,515.00 $ 72.25 $ 13,45/.25 $ 1,9944,0cDo ; 9 SPWEA24-9E 9-2,1P.PiNOUS V/ZAR r csDri237, DRIVES, SY 111.2C0: $5 6155.0°0° $5 1.590 OS 5 10,725.00 $ 4,560.M $ 141.05 5 243:52.7537:75 10 5F63/e2E 03 POT1NONSINISI NoN.wEAP COILS:SI, 5TREETs TN 165 5 70.00 $ 141.15 $ 10 55 $ 17,631.7S a,7so.00 5 13358;) $5 72,275.170 $ 547.60 al SPVISA7 409 ETOSSYNLTUS ISEA I, OSNAPSIF., STRF.ETS TN 125 S 207.05 $ 145.00 $ 1ii,411254..0000 $ 45754,..002:5 ;$ 77,13 5 3211 ;i: 51:1 0°°8C :i.. i CJGC°3 r7°3°0 5$555 700.00 5 12 EITLNINOL05 MATERIAL FOP TACK CrIAT GA 69 $ 3.00 56.00 $ 40.00 $ 47.00 5 44::56'79 55 52 : 6367 204 i 86 597 :', 00 456 p°5 LF 2o $ s5.00 5 '69 co NcRETE CURB 3,r3m-rgp,290.05 $ 75,07 $ 725,00 5 1, lochac 5 14 CL.5 AC.GREGATE RASE, SHOULDER TN: 55 $ 420°10aGr' : 100.00 5 1,100.02 $ 500 00 5 15 75" CMP PPE CC LVERT W/APPON 1.3 176 $ a sosxa S 7,120.00 $ 1,540.00 $ 1 SI 59 72 55 2,585.0C $ 16 CL. 3 RIP RAP 12// GCCTTEXTLE FABRIC CY 5 $ 500.00 $ 5,600.00 $ 65.00 $ 11,579.09 5 90.00 S 155.71 $2,155.SE 17 OFF ROAD sTNitccURE MAR KF.R EA 24 $S.:26$6.10 Ss SUECTOTAL On/ISION 4 $ 58,294.50 $ 100,446.37 4,4656770°4 $ $ 3,755,456.94 U.99 $s 12.02,8,12812:200s $ 40673 45 $ 3,29i,620.00 $ 92,58(04 Eng, Est, 40623AZ S 3,957.585,34 $ 3,461,201.60 45523,48 TABULATION OF BID5 LAKE ELMO, AVENUE SEWER INFRA509317LIRE I0000VE42ENT5 -194 TC 30TH STRE:7 C:Tv OF LAKE ELM°, ,A0317E.171A CITY PROLECT TKDA PROJEcT NO.15704001 BIOS OPENED. 101723,2059206060 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION 7'EM NO. ITEM Northwest Asphalt 1171,1' qUANTITY unit Price Total DIVISION 1- GENERAL 1 MC6ILIZATI0N L5 1 $ 362,545.07 $ 361,548.00 2 TEAPPIC CONTROL ES 1 5 16,500.00 $ 1.50 $ 156:6%03030000 3 5131 FENCE LF 4452 $ 100000 $ NI EGAA l 3.00000 4 ROCK CONS,IIRTTION EN,P PACE . $ 5 WATER Fop( Dust C7NTROL LI $ 5000 $ 090.77 6 TREE P.EN'oVAL SA 151 5 30000 5 45,300,00 7 CLEARING 8 790731N0 Ac 4,13 $ 4,500.00 $ 3,31.45Q5:0°0° ; 18,585,00 557,50 8 INLET PROTECTION EA 4 $ 3,825330 $ 0.99 $ 35,5054'0 5 HYDRO MULCH WI SEED & FERT fLIZ ER AC 76S.00 10 SEEDING (WETLAND MIX) AC 1,2c:275 ; 11 FROS,ON CONTROL BLANKET (wOco riSER) SY I.S.D0 5 12 TOPSOIL TOp 7'477 CY 5625 $ 500 5 4.75 5 5,568.75 1/ DITCH OLEO< LF 50 $ 3000 5 9; $2712 . 501)° sr 60 5 14 MODULAR BLOCK RETAININc WA 71. 15 SALVAGE/SALVAGE ANT:, REINSTALL F11ln-NC.,01l170TVIN ?UV " 10.0415.5 ALT FE.',...78E TS 1 $ 6,000.00 5 7,500,00 $ 67050;0000 16 RAIN GARDEN LI 1 $ SUBTOTAL DIVISION 1 $ 519,149,79 DIVISION Z.-SANITARY SEWER 10,300‘00 $ 1 CNNECT TO rY'TTNG N3AN,3E. CEA I $ 10,300.00 5 2 SALVAGE & REIN$TALL ")»c, ExIcSAS""*A.r,V SEWER ,/ 4 00DL.1 2,500.00 E EA5 3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL EXIsTING 5AN)Tr Ey 567,3.,.8 LF 100 5 2,500.00 4 LIFT STATION' s-rRucTu RE., VALVE VAULT, AND PIPiNc, LS 4 S 25%2:34403351 ,,' 0C,07: $$ 2423:4131.*C0°° _5 LIFT STATION pUM PS AND ACCESSORMS L.S. 1 $ 58,340.00 6 LIFT STATION ELECTRICAL 4130 CONTROLS LS I $ 122000.00 $ 122,100 CC 7 GENERATOR L5 a $ 97.500.00 5 90E00.00 8 cILEMIcAt FEED SYSTENI .51 5 2.12 ,00:005,:oomos ;$ 1,229125:40U,03:0103, 9 16" HOPE 508cFMAIN, INSTALLED BY ILDC LF 15271 5 10 10 Kopp ECRCZMAlS, INSTALLED 95°FEN CUT IF 399 $ 62.82 $ 25,065.18 11 8" pVC, 5Ci 35 SeN'TARY SEWER (10'45' DEPTH) LT 30 5 5 1,227.S0 12 8" PVC, SDP 35 ".4 %!!-"ARY 55-7,75r. 33.52S5.81. 0" DEPT11) LE 15 $ 607.15 13 8" PVC, s DR 35 SANITARY $EWER (20"25' DEpi 71) LT 15 $ 6 14 16" PVC, SDR 26 SALO f 4 P., FEWER (10-15' DEPTH:: LT 213 5 ,8;2902 ; 4033.80 193 $ 73.11 5 12,396 60 15 18" PVC, SDR 7.6 SAVTARY SEWER 45-20' DEPTH) LE -1754516341 SS' 14,110..21 16 18" pvC, P5115 SANITARY SEWER ;30-35' oEP-136) LT as $ 17 24" SANCEARy SEWER (0-45" DEPIP)) LF 5$ $ 79,43 $ 73,:9750:35E° is 24" 5AEUTAR3 SESVFP II0 335' DEPTH) Lr 8,1,733.47 19 24" 5A N)TARY 5rWTS 0.5-20 DEPTH) LF 1029 $ 1:23:6 $513;3412 ; 1.74,859.17 20 24" SANITARY 5EWER (2075' DEPTH) LF 73,6E8.48 6$$ 114007 $ 84,852.12 21 24" 507-A.R 4,75SW3.0. EE :25-' DEPTH) LF 0 21 219 $ 2.1" 5,2`!"TARs SEWER ,,30. -35' DEPTH LE 2i0624$ 881 5 2•3 24" &ATT., Cy sEWER (3.5'51 -4DEPT)-) IF 1E9 $35,670.77, 40.10 5 341762:0290 24 6" PVC, soli 26 SOLVENT WELD SERVICE PIPE LF 20 $ 2-5 6" oN 16" NNE BRANCH EA 3 $ 800.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 803.00 05 '18" 011m..7-p sA 9. 1334EULE.56, TYPE 301 (0310' DEFEW EA 11 $ 000.00 $ 77,50000 27 54" DIAMETER SAN. maNricLE, TYPE 3431K-10 DEPTP) EA 4 $ 3,694,00 5 28 4.9" DIAN, 7PR SA V. MANHOLE, TFPE 301 EXTRA DF.PT13 (>10' DEPTH) VF 102.5 514,776.00 1'3,250,00 7,081.20 29 54" DIAMETER SAN. MANDFIl E., PIPE 501 EXTRA DEPTH l>40' DEFooi) 0' 51.9 5 145.0C 5 30 72' CLEANOUT MANHOLE EA 5 5 19,250.00 5 46,25000 5 31 72" AIR RELEASE mANHOLE EA 4 5 17,000.00 60,007,07 32 E5 DIP CLASS 5C 5ANITAE7 SEWER LF 5 $ 77.51 $ 3 67.5") 33 18" 0 IP [Lass 50 sANITARy 5507E109.5C $ 8 LE 19 $ 132.50 $ 1,971.00 34 24" DIP CLASS 50 StOLETAPv 5E‘2,,7,4 LF IS $ 6,515.00 $ is'",031130s.)70) 35 EXTERNAL MANHOLE DROP .-A 2 $ $ / 4D.292.°Q 63 3E 16" RES. 5E47 CATE VALvF & BOX EA 18 $ 7,79400i; 37 EXCAVATE, SALvA63, AND s7cC<PILL WETLAND 50:1_ (Tv) Cop 609 5 s 4,811300 35 PLACE SALVAGED WELL -AND SOIL 14612 CY 803 $ 6.00 $ 4,818.00 TABULATION OF BIOS LAKE ELMO AVENUE SEWER tNFEASTEUCILRE POPROvEMENTS - :94 TO 30TH STREET CIFY OF LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA CITY PROJECT ?RUA PROJECT NO, 15204E71 RIDS UPENED: JULY 23, 2013 2:09 FM "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALL -I -RATION ITEM NO. ITEM 39 TRENCH STAEILIZATION ROCK 40 TELEVISING 41 HORIZONTAL DIRELTIONAL DRILLING BORE PITS SUBTOTAL DIVISION Northwest Alpha It UNIT QUANTITY Unit Price Total LE 309 5 5.00 $ 1,590.30 LR 4541 $ 2.00 15 9,0602.06 13 1 $ 86,900.00 5 86,000,00 $ 3,030,972-04 011/(510N 3 - VI4TERr.10.IN Lt 8536" vvE7T6F (iNcLuoE SLIEVI AND VALVE) EDI 1 $ 2,561.00 $ 2.$ 61.00 15 8" DIP. C.... 52 VVATERMAIN LF 382 $ 37.71 5 14,405.22 3 6" 130.0151 GATE VALVE & BoX EA 1 5 1,040.00 $ 1,040.00 4 5" HYDE "NT t8L6': BURY) EA 1 $ 3,530.00 $ 3,500.00 SUBTOTAL rvvisiorz 3 $ 21,506.22 DIVISION 4 - STREETS & RESTORATION I SAWCLITFTNIM'NOLLS PAVEMENT LE 85 5 3.3.0 $ 297.50 2 REMOVE FIRE DDLYERT tALL TYPES & SIZES; Li 375 $ 5.00 $ 560.00 3 SALVAGE & REINSTALL WOOD WIER EA 1 $ 2000000 $ 3,000 CO 4 REM111.n2t & DISDLOSR OF Emst 3' 112'0,3411LS FALTIFENT, DRIVES SY 12J $ 3_50 $ 420.00 5 REMOVE & ITE,PO`E DE EY'ST. 0E737ZLN61325 DATEMt Ni, STREETS sr 25 $ 16.50 $ 412.50 6 REMOVE a DISPOSE OF E-XiST. CONCP.ETE 3UR8 & Q LITTER LF 2.6' $ 8.00 5 160.00 7 LIFT STATION SITE GRADING LS 1 5 13,000,00 $ 23,000.00 8 1520 AGGREGATE BAsE TN 1101 $ 17.00 $ 18,717.00 9 SERIE,/ 2.1CF. T175M1.'GUS 51155,5 COLISSLE, DRIVES SY 12C $ 24.00 $ 2,680-00 115 SPRAT:30B TVTIRLDNOLT 3CIT WEAL LT DODDER, STREETS EN 16S $ 165270 $ 27,225.00 11 SPWEA240113IT1l1TNOUE WEAR COURSE, .TqFETS 753 125 $ 220.00 $ 51,550.00 12 ar,,,,,,:,,,Is VA-EYAL FDA "R.DE COAT GA 69 $ 8.00 $ 552.00 13 CONCRETE CURS & GUTTER LF 2G $ 35,30 5 6015.n0 14 C25 AGGREGATE SASE, SHOULDER TN 55 $ 24.00 $ 1,320.00 15 15" GsrP Pta CLUZETW,FATROT LF 178 $ 30.00 $ 5,34C.00 J.$ a_ a $ IP RAP 1AD GEOTEXTLE FABRIC CY 5 5 90.00 $ 450,00 17 C..F. ROAD STRUCTURE MAP YEA EA 24 5 75.0.0 $ 1,890,00 SUBTOTAL trs.PSON 4 $ 114,564.0() 40623.42 436-23.46 4062.3.46 15 3,60,19Z-51 D��|��TSCHEDULE PROJECT DATE: March IZ,2U13 ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Geheen,P.E. Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan Stempskip.c Chad /s,ka,r,p.s. City OfLake Elmo, Minnesota Project NO.2O13.173 Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements: 1-94 to 3 oth Street March 19,2U13 Council Workshop —Address Scope ofImprovements/Project Schedule March 1q'2Ol3 Council orders preparation of Plans and Specifications/approves Engineering Contract March 26,ZU13 Project kick-off meeting [8 Weeks for Design] June I8,ZO13 City Engineer presents Plans and Specifications for Council approval June Zl,2O13 Placement ofAdfor Bids July Z3,ZOl3 Receive Contractor Bids August 6,Z0I3 City Council accepts bids and awards Contract September 9,I0I] Issue Notice tnProceed. Contractor begins Work December ZO,ZU13 Substantial Completion [includes all pipe installation, Lift Station start-up, paving] 16Weeks [8'1Zweek pump & control panel lead time] June 1,2014 Final Completion [includes restoration, and punch list items) Forcemain Alianmen WHIST-O NG VALLEY TAtr yr, r. axw. eaewr �,_.—,tpTHST 3 4- SRO STREET Pt N RE Proposed Litt Station Location Gravity Sewer Alignment MCES Connecti LAKE ELMO AVENUE SEWER INFRASTRUCTURE IMPROVEMENTS: 194 TO 30TH STREET LOCATION MAP 1�t1. Legend Proposed Forcemain Proposed Gravity Sewer City lick Public Works BufldFng sus w.�iavex .541 FireStations Sehoots Parcels 5ubdlvis ens City Parks Golf Course Lake Dyne Regional Park Reserve Lakes ktep Date: June 2013 FOCUSENGINEERING,inc. TH CITY OF AKE E,LMO AGENDA ITEM: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: 8/06/2013 Well No. 4 Connecting Watennain — Authorize the Preparation of a Feasibility Report SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Chad Isakson, Project Engineer 11 MORI.9111 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ........ ...... ........ ..... ..... .................... City Engineer Report/Presentation City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing FOCUS Engineering to prepare a Feasibility Report for the Well No, 4 Connecting Watennain project in the estimated amount of $3,900. The report will satisfy Chapter 429 requirements to specially assess benefitting properties. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-60„ Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Well No. 4 Connecting Waterman' Improvements." STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2013-2014 Capital Improvement Plan, waterrnain will need to be extended along 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue, from 50th Street to 43rd Street, to connect Well No. 4 to the City's existing distribution system. Individual home service stubs and fire hydrants will be installed as a part of the project as the trunk waterrnain is extended past existing residential properties. The improvements will benefit the property owners by providing them the opportunity to connect to the municipal water system and will provide increased fire protection for the property. The feasibility report is necessary to satisfy the state required process to assess the benefiting property owners if the City wishes to levy assessments as part of the project. Similar to the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, this project is being installed as part of the overall water system capital improvement plan, and not as a project to specifically deliver municipal water to the adjacent properties. Therefore the adjacent properties are not required to pay 100% of the infrastructure extension costs as is seen in other utility extension projects, but the properties will receive benefit. The feasibility report and subsequent public hearings will be completed at the same time as the design of the watermain extension. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the City Council authorize FOCUS Engineering, Inc. to prepare the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Feasibility Report in the estimated amount of $3,900. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-60, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Well No. 4 Connecting Watermain Improvements." ATTACHMENT(S): 1. Resolution No. 2013-60 2. Location Map CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-60 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE WELL NO. 4 CONNECTING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, it is proposed to extend trunk watermain facilities along 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue, from 50th Street to 43thi Street in order to connect Well No. 4 to the water distribution system; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to provide connection service stubs to properties located adjacent to the watermain improvements; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to the City's Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, FOCUS Engineering is instructed to complete a feasibility report in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the proposed improvements, and to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-60 ell No. 4 Site Install 12-inch Diameter Trunk Watermain :t.0"4.445tt r11 11N Or Proposed Watermain Corridor: AKE ELIV Lake Elmo Avenue North FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. '3 Existing Watermain Proposed Trunk Watermain Corridor October 2012 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota 1 o lomatowerra.„-ANNIMINNO11111111.111 1,1P, tee Project Number: 2012.129 THE CITY OF K E F LIVE0 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: 8/06/2013 12 AGENDA ITEM: Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements — Authorize Preparation of Plans and Specifications and Approve Engineering Design and Construction Support Services Contract SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Chad Isakson, Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ........ . ......................... ..... ................... ....... City Engineer Report/Presentation City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion Mayor & City Council - Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing the preparation of Plans and Specifications and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract for the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-61, Ordering preparation of the Plans and Specifications the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watermain Improvements; and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract as recommended by the City Engineer." STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2013-2014 Capital Improvement Plan, the City is pursing the addition of a new water supply well, Well No. 4, to support the current and future 'owth and development water supply needs for the City. The project is being completed under three separate contracts to align with the various required contractor specialties; namely well driller; building, electrical, controls, and EIVAC contractor; and utility contractor. Well No. 4 is currently in construction with an estimated completion date of November 8, 2013. All three contracts, together with the Keats Trunk Watermain Improvements, are part of the city's water system DEED grant, whereby the city must expend 81.0 million in local matching funds to receive the $1.0 million state bond grant. Per the Grant Agreement, all grant funds must be fully expended by Deceinber 31, 2014. To continue the implementation of this project, staff is requesting authorization to begin the preparation of plans and specifications for the Well Pumhouse and the necessary watermain to connect the well to the existing distribution system. The connecting watermain includes roughly 3,500 feet extended along Street and Lake Elmo Avenue to the intersection of Lake Elino Avenue and 43'1 Street. As identified above, the plans and specifications will be prepared as two separate contracts in order to retain two separate prime contractors to construct the work. To complete the engineering design, the City Engineer prepared and sent out a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Engineering Support Services that includes a full topographic survey, the preparation of plans and specifications; plan printing, distribution and bidding services; construction administration support to the City Engineer, and construction staking. FOCUS Engineering will provide resident and council communication, conduct public meetings, project management, coordinate the project permitting, and will provide construction administration services for the project. FOCUS will also oversee the project design and quality control review, and provide City design standards and documents to be incorporated with the project plans. Construction observation services will be retained at a later date once the project has been bid and awarded for construction. The RFP was sent to three firms from the City's Engineering Consultant Pool, including AE2S, Bolton & Menk, and SEH. The proposals will be received on August 2, 2013 and will be reviewed and ranked on the basis of: Project Team Qualifications with a focus on a Project Manager capable of leading and delivering a multi -discipline building project; Demonstrated understanding and experience with the project: and understanding of the critical success factors; Understanding the scope of work and roles and responsibilities of the Consultant; Collaboration skills and responsiveness demonstrated during the RFP submittal process; and Engineering Fee. The City Engineer will provide a recommendation at the council meeting to award the Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract based on the above criteria. FtEcQM1VI[NDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council authorize the preparation of Plans and Specifications and awarding a Professional Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract for the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Watennain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-61, Ordering preparation tithe Plans and Specifications br the Pumphouse No. 4 and Connecting Waterman; Improvements; and awarding an Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract as recommended by the City Engineer." ATTACHNIENT(S): Resolution No, 2013-61 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-61 A RESOLUTION ORDERING PREPARATION OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS; AND APPROVING ENGINEERING SERVICES CONTRACT FOR THE PUMPHOUSE NO. 4 AND CONNECTING WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to the current 2013-2014 Capital improvement Plan the City is constructing municipal water supply Well No. 4; and WHEREAS, in order for proper operation and use of the well the City needs to design and construct a pumphouse with trunk connecting watermain; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, The City Engineer is hereby designated as the engineer for this improvement. The engineer shall oversee the preparation of the Plans and Specifications for the making of such improvement. The City Engineer shall retain the services of a consulting engineering firm, to assist, where needed, to prepare Plans and Specifications for the making of such improvement and to assist the City Engineer during the construction phase of the improvement as requested. The Engineering Design and Construction Support Services contract is hereby approved as recommended by the City Engineer. 4. The City Council declares its official intent to reimburse itself for the costs of the improvement from the proceeds of tax exempt bonds. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-61 '11-11,1 CITY OF LA, K E ELMO AGENDA ITEM: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION. DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: 8/06/2013 13 Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements — Authorize the Preparation of a Feasibility Report SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Chad Isakson, Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of item City Engineer Report/Presentation City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider authorizing FOCUS Engineering to prepare a Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk W atermain Improvements in the estimated amount of $6,700. The report will satisfy Chapter 429 requirements to specially assess benefiting properties. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-62, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain improvements." STAFF REPORT: In accordance with the 2014 Capital Improvement Plan, trunk watennain will need to be extended along Inwood Avenue N., from 261h Street N. to the approximate location of Well No. 3, to provide municipal water service to the developing properties in the 194 corridor. A water booster station has been identified as part of this improvement to increase water pressures in the southern part of the city due to higher topography. These improvements are consistent with the 2030 Water System Comprehensive Plan. The proposed watermain route is shown on the attached location map. As indicated on the map, alternative alignments may need to be considered for the watermain being installed south of 10th Street to correspond with the sequencing of the various potential development projects (Azur properties, Montgomery properties, etc.). This includes the possibility that the final alignment may not be determined at the conclusion of this feasibility report, pending ongoing development alternatives. In the end, however, the goal of this project is to provide water service to properties planning to develop south of 10th Street and to develop the route and sequence of its construction in collaboration with various developments moving forward. A Preliminary Study was completed for this corridor to prepare high level cost estimates for extending municipal water service to the nearby neighborhood areas including Torre Pines, Parkview Estates, Cardinal Ridge and Cardinal View. From this evaluation it was determined that extending waterain into these neighborhoods could be better accomplished as independent projects with the exception of Parkview Estates. It is therefore recommended that the trunk waterrnain be routed to include the Parkview Estates neighborhood as part of this project, to avoid redundant water system pipe and associated costs in the future. Individual home service stubs and fire hydrants will be installed as a part of the project as the trunk waterrnain is extended past residential properties. The improvements will benefit the property owners by providing them the opportunity to connect to the municipal water system and will provide increased fire protection for the property. The feasibility report is necessary to satisfy the state required process to assess the benefiting property owners if the City wishes to levy assessments as part of the project. Similar to the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, this project is being installed as part of the overall water system capital improvement plan, and not as a project to specifically deliver municipal water to the adjacent properties. Therefore the adjacent properties are not required to pay 1 00% of the infrastructure extension costs as is seen in other utility extension projects, but the properties will receive benefit. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council authorizes FOCUS Engineering, Inc. to prepare the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements Feasibility Report in the estimated amount of $6,700. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-62, Ordering preparation of a Feasibility Report for the Inwood Booster Station and Trunk Watermain Improvements." ATTACHMENT(3): I. Resolution No. 2013-62 2. Project Schedule 3. Location Map 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-62 A RESOLUTION 0 JER1NG PREPARATION OF A FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR THE INWOOD BOOSTER STATION AND TRUNK WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, the 2014 water system capital improvement plan identifies a new water booster station together with the extension of trunk watennain along Inwood Avenue North, from 26th Street N. to the approximate site of Well No. 3, to provide municipal water service to the developing properties in the 194 corridor; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to route this trunk watermain through the Parkview Estates neighborhood along Ivory Avenue N. and 15t Street N. in order to more cost effectively construct the water distribution system; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to provide connection service stubs to properties located adjacent to the trunk watennain improvements; and WHEREAS, it is proposed to assess a portion of the cost of the improvements pursuant to the City's Special Assessment Policy and Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, 1. FOCUS Engineering is instructed to complete a feasibility report in accordance with Minnesota Statutes, Chapter 429 for the proposed improvements, and to report to the council with all convenient speed advising the council in a preliminary way as to whether the proposed improvement is necessary, cost-effective, and feasible; whether it should best be made as proposed or in connection with some other improvement; the estimated cost of the improvement as recommended; and a description of the methodology used to calculate individual assessments for affected parcels. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2013. (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor Resolution No. 2013-62 [D[��TSCHEDULE r/vx��"_| ENGINEERING, inc. Project Title: Inwood Booster Station and Trunk VVaternnaln Extension — Feasibility Report Client: City ofLake Elmo Project No.: 2023.1xx Date: July 26, 2013 Cara Geh��E. Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan StempsN'P.E Chad |sakson, P.E. 651.300.4261 651.300.4264 651.300.4267 651.300.4283 August 8`2Ol3 Council orders preparation of aFeasibility Report. August Gi2OI3 Team kickoff meeting, Schedule resident meeting and send out NOTICES. TBD,2OlS Resident meeting topresent the project. September 3,30I3 Presentation of Feasibility Report to Council. Council passes resolution receiving report and calling for a hearing on improvements to be held October 1, 2013. September 4, 2013 Send notice of public hearing to residents and post in newspaper, October I,2013 Public Improvement Hearing. Council passes resolution ordering Improvement and preparation ofPlans. February 4`ZOI4 Approve Plans and Specifications and authorize advertisement for bids. March fi 2014 Accept Contractor Bids March 18,2014 Award Contract. March Zl,2Q24 Pro -less and send out Contract Documents. April 1I,ZO14 Receipt ofContractor's Bonds / Legal Review. April l5,2O14 Conduct Pre -construction Meeting & Issue Notice toProceed, Septernber,Z8l4 Substantial completion. October,2Ol4 Final Completion Date. Record As'bui|ts;Testing Results; and Final Recommendation Letter toCity Engineer. TIiE CITY OF Install 12-inch Diameter Trunk Watermain Inwood Booster Station LAKE ELMO and Trunk Watermain Improvements ',,,,,RZZSAd*rdtat' 444 ta Existing Watermain Inwood Watermain Corridor (Parkview Estates) Watermain - Final route to be determined ' FOCUS ENGINEERING, inc. 462,5 KS 1,850 feet July 2013 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota T111-2 O- Ii\KEELMO MAYOR & COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 8/6/2013 REGULAR ITEM #: 14 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Presentation of Financing Plan of G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A; Approval of the issuance of G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director THROUGH: Paul Donna, Senior Vice President, Northland Securities REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item City Staff Report/Presentation . City Staff, Northland Securities Questions from Council to Staff .Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: At the July 2, 2013 City Council meeting, the approved the issuance and sale of G.O. Bonds to fund the 2013 CIP projects. BACKGROUND INFORMATION:, In order to fund various infrastructure projects in 2013 (Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements, Production Well #4 and connecting Watennain, Lake Elmo Avenue Sewer Infrastructure Improvements and the Section 34 Water and Sewer Utility Extension), G.O. Bond funding will be necessary. The City of Lake Elmo retains the services of Northland Securities as Bond Counsel who has prepared a Financing Plan for consideration. The Finance Department has been working closely Northland to be sure the proposed Financing Plan complies with the City Debt Management Policy which was approved by Council in April 2013 STAFF REPORT: Paul Donna, Senior Vice President with Northland Securities will present the report and respond to inquiries. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve Resolution 2013-63 authorizing the issuance and sale of $5,725.000 in General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A. "Move to Approve Resolution 2013-63 authorizing the issuance of G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A in the amount of S5,72.5,000" ATTACHMENTS: 1) Northland Securities Finance Plan Summary for G.O. Bonds, Series 2013A 2) Resolution 2013-63 3) Certification for Resolution 2013-63 CERTIFICATION OF MINUTES RELATING TO GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A ISSUER: City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota BODY: City Council KIND, DATE, TIME AND PLACE OF MEETING: A regular meeting held on Tuesday, August 6, 2013, at 7:00 o'clock p.m., in the City Offices MEMBERS PRESENT: MEMBERS ABSENT: Documents Attached: Extract of Minutes of said meeting. RESOLUTION 2013-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A I, the undersigned, being the duly qualified and acting recording officer of the public corporation issuing the obligations referred to in the title of this certificate, certify that the documents attached hereto, as described above, have been carefully compared with the original records of said corporation in my legal custody, from which they have been transcribed; that said documents are a correct and complete transcript of the minutes of a meeting of the governing body of said corporation, and correct and complete copies of all resolutions and other actions taken and of all documents approved by the governing body at said meeting, so far as they relate to said obligations; and that said meeting was duly held by the governing body at the time and place and was attended throughout by the members indicated above, pursuant to call and notice of such meeting given as required by law. WITNESS MY HAND officially as such recording officer on August 611), 2013. City Clerk EXTRACT OF MINUTES OF A MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF LAKE ELMO, STATE OF MINNESOTA HELD: Tuesday, August 6, 2013 Pursuant to due call and notice thereof, a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, State of Minnesota, was duly held on Tuesday. August 6, 2013 at 7:00 o'clock p.m. Member introduced the following resolution and moved its adoption: RESOLUTION 2013-63 RESOLUTION APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS; SERIES 2013A BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, State of Minnesota (herein, the "City"), as follows: The City Council hereby finds and declares that it is necessary and expedient for the District to sell and issue its fully registered general obligation bonds in the total aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $5,725,000 (herein, the "Bonds"). The proceeds of the Bonds will be used, together with any additional funds of the City which might be required, to provide funding for public infrastructure within the City and to fund the costs of issuing the Bonds. The City Council desires to proceed with the sale of the Bonds by direct negotiation to Northland Securities, Inc. (herein, "NSI"). 3. The Finance Director and City Administrator are hereby authorized to approve the sale of the Bonds in an aggregate principal amount of not to exceed $5,725,000 and to execute a bond purchase agreement for the purchase of the Bonds with NSI, provided the True Interest Cost ("TIC") does not exceed 4.50%. 4. Upon approval of the sale of the Bonds by the Finance Director and City Administrator, the City Council will take action at its next regularly scheduled meeting thereafter to adopt the necessary approving resolutions as prepared by the City's bond counsel. 5. NSI is authorized to prepare and distribute an official statement related to the sale of the Bonds. 6. If the Finance Director and the City Administrator have not approved the sale of the bonds to NSI and executed the related bond purchase agreement by December 31, 2013 this resolution shall expire. The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by Member , and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against the same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. mce.,satAitti,F . .„. • . • . „ FOR CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA $5,725,000 GENERAL OBLIGATION BONDS, SERIES 2013A NORTHLAND 'CURIT1ES 45 South 7th Street Suite 2000 Minneapolis, MN 55402 612-851-5900 800-851-2920 August 6, 2013 Vq.42.4gerNiar7,N.,•,!icz,x 3,YafrA. v4,t4 Clq. 7 4-4, n ore. 4, .4 4 :4.... I 7.4 FINANCING OVERVIEW This Finance Plan Summary describes the recommended terms and process for the public issuance of $5,725,000 of General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A through a negotiated sale process. PURPOSE Proceeds from the Bonds will be used to fund a portion of the City's 2013 infrastructure projects including: • Keats Avenue street and watermain project • Well #4 & pump house #4 project Lake Elmo Avenue sewer improvements • Lennar Area water & sewer improvements The estimated financing required for project costs is $5,600,000 allocated to include $1.0M of water system costs, $3.OM of sewer system costs and $1.6M of special assessment costs. The total borrowing required including financing costs is $5,725,000 and is detailed below. Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 10/01/2013 I Delivered 10/01/2013 Sources Of Funds Par Amount 0113°11(1s Total Sources Uses Of Funds Total Costs of Issuance „.. De;posity Project Construction Fund Rounding Amount Total Uses GO Improvement GO Water GO Sewer Issue (Assessment) Revenue Revenue Summary $1.635,000.00 $1„:0252000.00 $3,065.000.00 $5.725,000.00 81,635414111.00 51,025,000.00 $3,065,000.00 85,725,0094)0 34,379.98 1,600,000,00_ 620.02 21,553.20 64,449.32 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 3,446.80 550.68 S1,635,1100.00 $1.025,000.00 120,382.50 5,600,000.00 4,617.50 $3,065,000.00 $5,725,000.00 Page 2 NO IZ.T I 1 LA NI) St.( L: It 1 I 1 - aA.:44.4 STATUTORY AUTHORITY The Bonds will be issued pursuant to the authority of Minnesota Statutes Chapter 475, 429 and 444. The City's bond attorney from Dorsey & Whitney is assuring compliance with Minnesota and Federal laws. DEBT SERVICE STRUCTURE The total repayment generally reflects a level annual requirement over a term of fifteen years with an assumed average interest rate of 2.92% and an all inclusive cost of 3.13%. Individual repayment schedules for the improvement or assessment portion, water system portion and sewer system portion have been reviewed with City staff regarding projected revenues to repay the debt service and compliance with the City's Debt Management Policies. The total estimated debt service is illustrated below. A complete illustration of the debt service schedules for each of the portions is included as Appendix A. Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I. 07/1572014 220.000.00 0.300"A 105.969.47 325,969.47 07/15/7015 305,000.00 0.550% 133,667.50 438,667,50 07/15/2016 310,000.00 0.800% 131,990.00 441,990,00 07/15/2017 310.000.00 1.100% 129,510.00 439,510.00 07/15/2018 320,000.00 1.400% 126.100,00 446,100.0.0 .....„ . 1)7/15/2019 320,000.1)0 1.650% 121,620.00 441,620.00 07/15/2020 325,000.00 1.900% 116,340.00 441,340.00 07/15/2021 325.000.00 2.150% 110,165.00 435,165.00 07,15/2022 335,000.00 2.40040 103,177.50 438.177.50 07/15/2023 300.000.00 2.600% ... 95,137.50 395,137.50 ,..„,,.. 07/15/2024 315,000.00 2.750% 87,337.50 402,337.50 07/15/2025 315,0(10.00 2.900% 78,675.00 393,675.00 07/5/2026 320,000.00 3.050% 69,540.00 389,540.00 07/15/2027 325.000.00 3.200% 59,780.00 384,780,00 07/15/2028 325,000,00 3.350% 49,380.00 374,380,00 .........__. 07/15/2029 200,000.00 3.500% 38.492,50 238,492.50 07/15/2030 205,000.00 3.600% 31,492.50 236,492.50 07/15/2031 205,000.00 3.700% 24.112.50 229,112.50 07/15/2032 220,000.00 3,575% 16.527.50 236,527.50 07/15/2033 225,000.00 3.850% 8,662.50 233.662.,50. Total $5,725.000.00 51,637,676.97 $7,362,676.97 UV VT5,4'1, Page 3 NO RII I N D (,*1, S E C RITI SECURITY & SOURCE OF REPAYMENT The Bonds will be a general obligation of the City of Lake Elmo. In addition, the City will pledge special assessments of approximately $1,635,000 (100% of the Improvement Project) to the repayment of the debt service on the Improvement Portion of the Bonds. The assessment revenue assumes first collection in 2014 over a term of 15 years and an interest rate of 4.50%. We have assumed the water and sewer debt service portions of the bond issue will be supported 100% from the respective enterprise funds and have therefore pledged those sources accordingly. An illustration of the projected debt service fund cash flow is below. Revenue vs D/S Date 07/15/2014 07/15/2015 07/15/2016 07115/2017 07/15/2018 07/15/2019 07/15/2020 07/15/2021 07/15/2022 07/15/702.3 07/15/2024 07/15/2025 07/15/2026 07/15/2027 _07/15/2028 07/15/2029 07/15/2030 07/15/2031 07/15/2032 Scheduled P+I 325,969.47 438,667.50 441,990.00 439,510.00 446.100,00 441,620,00 441,340.00 435,165.00 438,177,50 395,137.50 402.337.50 393,675.00 389,540.00 384.780,00 374,380.00 238,492.50 236.492.50 229,112.50 236,527.50 07/15/2033233,662.50„ Total $7.362,676.97 Less: Less: Equals: Water Sewer Improvement Revenues Portion Portion 59,795.19 193.646.00 72.528.28 74,972.50 223,935.00 139,760,00 74,697.50 228,110.00 139,182.50 74,297.50 226,870.00 138,342.50 78,747.50 230,165.00 137,187.50 77,977.50 277,975.00 135,717,50 77,070.00 225.285.00 138,985.00 76,025.00 222,245.00 136.895.00 79.842.50 218,805.00 139,530.00 63.402.50 194,965.00 67,232.50 196.325.00 65,857.50 192,337.50 64,407.50 188.132.50 62,882,50 188,710.00 61,282.50 483,910.00 59,607.50 178,885.00 57,857,50 178.635.00 56,057.50 173,055,00 59,207.50 177,320.00 57.H 7.50 176,545.00 1,348,337.69 $4,025,806.00 $1,988,5 Less: Assessment 105%Levy Revenues* 76,154.70 77,795.37 146,748.00 155.589.73 146.141.63 155,590.68 145,259.63 155,589.85 144:946.88 155,590.34 142.503.38 155.589.83 145,934.25 155,590.60 143.739.75 155,590.56 146,506.50 155.59122 136,770.00 143,608,50 155,589,64 138,780.00 145,719,00 155,590.49 135,480.00 142,254.00 155,590.84 137,000.00 143,850.00 155,59(1.35 133,187.50 139,846.88 155,590,20 129.187.50 135,646.88 155,590.06 3.28 $2,087,959.95 S2.256,059.76 Annual Cash Balance 1,640.67 8,841.73 9.449.05 10,330.23 11,543.47 13,086.46 9,656.35 11,850.81 9,084.72 11,981.14 9.871 A9 13,336.84 11,740.35 15,743.33 19,943.19 Page 4 NO Rill N D SEC TIES RELATED CONSIDERATIONS Bank Oualification - We understand the City (in combination with any subordinate taxing jurisdictions or debt issued in the City's name by 501c3 corporations) anticipates issuing S10.OM or less in tax-exempt debt during this calendar year. Therefore the bonds will be designated as "bank qualified" obligations pursuant to Federal Tax Law. Arbitrage and Rebate - Because the City will. have issued more than $5.0M in tax- exempt bonds in calendar year 2013 the City will elect the Two Year Expenditure Exemption in order to exempt the Series 2013A proceeds from rebate. This exemption from rebate does not eliminate the need to comply with other arbitrage regulations governing the investment of bond proceeds and debt service funds. In particular, the City should become familiar with the requirements for maintaining a "bona fide" debt service .fund. These requirements will be explained in the bond transcript following closing. Continuing Disclosure - Because this issue is greater than $1,000,000, and the City's outstanding debt exceeds $10.0M, it is subject to the Securities and Exchange Commission's continuing disclosure requirements. Northland Securities is prepared to assist the City in this capacity. ;4. Page 5 NORT1lLAN 1-)(4) SEC L.RI Fi ES SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDED TERMS 1. Type of Bond Sale 2. Bond Pricing 3. Council Consideration 4. Statutory Authority . Repayment Term 6. Security 7. Prepayment Option 8. Tax Status 9. Credit Enhancement Public Offering - Negotiated Sale with Northland Wednesday, September 11, 2013. Tuesday, September 17, 2013 @ 7:00 P.M The Bonds are being issued pursuant to Minnesota Statutes 475, 429 and 444. The Bonds will mature annually each July 15, 2014 - 2033. Interest on the Bonds will be payable on July 15, 2014 and semiannually thereafter on each January 15 and July 15. General Obligation of the City. In addition, the City will pledge special assessment revenues collected from benefitted properties to the Improvement Portion and water and sewer revenues to the respective Water and Sewer Portions of the Bonds. The Bonds maturing July 15, 2022 - 2033 will be subject to prepayment on July 15, 2021 at a price of par plus accrued interest. Dorsey and Whitney, LLP Minneapolis, Minnesota, We believe a credit rating will be cost beneficial. The City's general obligation debt is currently rated Aa2 by Moody's Investors Service. wi Page 6 NO RTI ILAN SF.CL: RIT', ES S5,725,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as ofJuly 9, 2013 Table of Contents Report ISSUE SUMMARY 'rota] Issue Sources And Uses Debt Service Schedule Revenue vs D/S GO IMPROVEMENT Debt Service Schedule GO WATER REVENUE Debt Service Schedule GO SEWER REVENUE Debi Service Schedule GO 2013A Rey 4 I Issue Summary I 7/2672013 I 1125AM 4 6 7 Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance $5,725,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as ofJuly 9, 2013 Total Issue Sources And Uses Dated 10/01/2013 1 Delivered 10/01/2013 Sources Of Funds Par Amount of Bonds Total Sources Uses Of Funds Total Costs of issuance Deposit to Project Construction Fund Rounding Amount Total Uses GO 2013A Rev 4 1 Issue Summary ; 7/26/2013 1125 AM GO improvement GO Water GO Sewer Issue (Assessment) Revenue Revenue Summary $1,635,000.00 $1,025,000.00 $3.065,000,00 $5,725,000.00 S1,635,000.00 51,025,000.00 $3,065,000.00 $5.725,000.00 34,379.98 21,553.20 64.449.32 1,600,000.00 1,000,000.00 3,000,000.00 620.02 3,446.80 550.68 120,382.50 5,600,000.00 4,617.50 $1,635.000.00 $1,025,000.00 53,065,000.00 55,725,000.00 Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance S5,725,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 Debt Service Schedule Part 1 of 2 Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total, 10/01/2013 - 07/15/2014 220,000.00 0.300°..'; 105,969.47 325,969.47 01/15/2015 66,833,75 6(033.75 02/01/2015 - 392.803.22 07/15/2015 305.000,00 0.550% 66,833.75 371.833,75 01/15/2016 - 65,995.00 65,995,00 - 02/01/2016 - - 437,828.75 07/15/2016 310,000.00 0.800% 65,995.00 375,995.00 - 01/15/2017 - 64,755.00 64.755.00 02/01/2017 - - 07/15/2017 310,000.00 1.10054 64,755.00 374,755.00 01/15/2018 - 63,050.00 63,050,00 . 02/01/2018 , 437.805.00 07/15/2018 320,000.00 1.400% 63,050.00 383.050,00 _ 01/15/2019 60,810.00 60,810.00 - 02/01/2019 . 443,860.00 07/15/2019 320.000.00 1.650% 60,810.00 380,810.00 - 01/15/2020 58,170.00 58.170.00 02/01./2020 . 07/15/2020 325,000.00 1.90056 58,170.00 383,170.00 01/1572021 55,082.50 55.082.50 02/01/2021 438,252.50 07/15/2021 325.000.00 2.150% 55.082.50 380,082.50 01/15/2022 - 51,588.75 51.588.75 02/01/2022 - . 431,671.25 07/15/2(122 335.000.00 2.40056 51,588.75 386,588.75 01/15/2023 - 47,568.75 47,568.75 02/01/2023 434,157.50 07/15/2023 300.000.00 2.600% 47,568.75 347,568.75 01/15/2024 43,668.75 43.668.75 02/01/2024 - - 391,237.50 (17/15/2(124 315,000.00 2.7504,,,, 43,668.75 358,668.75 - 01/15/2025 - - 39.337.50 39,337.50 - 02/01/2025 398.006,25 07/15/2025 315,000.00 2.900% 39,337.50 354,337.50 - 01/15/2026 34,770.00 34,770.00 - 02(01/2026 389,107.50 07/15/2026 320,000.00 3.050% 34.770.00 354,770.00 - 01/15/2027 29,890,00 29,890.00 - 02/01/2027 - 384.660.00 07/15/2027 325,000.00 3.200% 29.890.00 354,890.00 - 01/15/2028 24,690.00 24.690.00 - 02/01/2028 - 379,580.00 Go 2013A Rev 4 I Issue Summary I 7/26/2013 I 11:25 AM 440.750.00 438.980.00 Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance Page 2 $5,725,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as ofJuly 9, 2013 Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I 07/15/2028 325.000.00 3.350% 24.690.00 349,690,00 01/15/2029 - 19,246.25 19,246.25 02/01/2029 . - 07/15/2029 200,000.00 3.500% 19,246.25 219,246.25 01/15/2030 - 15,746.25 15.746.25 02/01/2030 - 07/15/2030 205,000.00 3,600% 15,746.25 220,746.25 01/15/2031 - 12,056.25 12,056.25 02/01/2031 - - - 07/15/2031 205.000.00 3.700% 12.056.25 217,056.25 01/15/2032 - - 8,263.75 8,263.75 02/01/2032 - - 07/15/2032 22(1,000.00 3.575% . 8,263.75 228.263.75 01/15/2033 - - 4.331.25 4,331.25 02/01/2033 - - - 07/15/2033 225,000.00 3.850Y 4,331.25 229,331.25 02/01/2034 - - - Total 85,725,000.00 8I.637.676.97 S7,362,676.97 Date And Term Structure Dated Delivery Date First Coupon Date First available call date Call Price Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cosi (NJC) True Interest Cost (TIC) All Inclusive Cost (A1C) IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes GO 20/3A Rev 4 1 Issue Summaiy 716/2013 11:25 AM Part 2 of 2 Fiscal Total, 368,936.25 234,992.50 232,802.50 225.320.00 232,595.00 229,331.25 10/01/2013' 10/01/2013 7/15/2014 7/15/2020 100.00% S56,686.39' 9.797 Years 2.9199187% 3.0475121% 3.0204465% 3.1255989% 2.9199187% 9.797 Years 2.8686704% Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance $5,725,000,00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Aa2 BQ Rates as of July 9, 2013 Revenue vs D/S Less: Less: Scheduled Water Sewer Date P+I Revenues Portion 07/15/2014 325,969.47 59,795.19 193,646.00 07/15/2015 438.667.50 74,972.50 2.23,935.00 07/15/2016 441,990.00 74,697.50 228,110.00 07/15/2017 439,51(1,00 74,297.50 226,870.00 07/15/2018 446.100.00 78,747.50 230,165.00 07/15/2019 441,620,00 77,977.50 227,925.00 07/15/2020 441,340.00 77,070,00 225,285.00 07/15/2021 435,165.00 76.025.00 222,245.00 07/15/2022 438.177.50 79,842.50 218,805.00 07/15/2023 395,137,50 63,402.50 194965.00 07/15/2024 402.337.50 67.232.50 196,325.00 07/15/2025 393,675.00 65,857.5(1 192,337.50 07/15/2026 389,540.00 64,407.50 188.132.50 07/1572027 384,780.00 62,882.50 188,710.00 07/15/2028 374.380,00 _61.282.50 _183.910.00 07/15/2029 238,492.50 59,607.50 178,885.00 07/15/2030 236,492.50 57,857.50 178,635.00 07/15/2031 229,112.50 56,057,50 173,055.00 07/15/2032 236,527.50 59,207.50 177,320.00 07/15/2033 233.662.50 57,117.50 176.545.00 Equals: Improvement Portion 72,528.28 139.760.00 139,182.50 138,342.5(1 137.187.50 135,717.50 138,985.00 136.895.00 139,530.00 136,770.00 138,780.00 135,480.00 137,000.00 133,187.50 129,187.50 Total $7,362,676.97 S1,348,337.69 $4,025,806.00 S1,988,533.28 105% Levy 76,154.7(1 146.748.00 146,141.63 145,259.63 144,046.88 142,503.38 145,934.25 143.739.75 146,506.50 143,608.50 145,719.00 142,254.00 143,850.00 139,846.88 135,646.88 $2,087,959.95 *Assumes 100% o project is assessed at a rate of 4.50% for a term of 15 years. GO 2013A Rey 4 1 Issue Summary 1 7/26/2013 1125 AM Less: Assessment Revenues* 77,795.37 155,589.73 155,590.68 155,589.85 155,590.34 155,589.83 155,590.60 155,590.56 155.591.22 155,589.64 155,590,49 155.590.84 155,59(1.35 155,590.20 155,590.06 $2,256,059.76 Annual Cash Balance, 1,640.67 8,841.73 9,449.05 1(3,330.23 11.543.47 13.086.46 9,656.35 11,850.81 9,084.72 11,981.14 9,871.49 13,336.84 11,740.35 15,743.33 19,943.19 Northland Securities Inc, Public Finance Page 4 $1,635,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Improvement Portion Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total, 10/01/.7013 - 07/15/2014 45.000.00 0.300% 27,528.28 72,528.28 72,328.28 01/15/2015 17,380.00 17,380.00 07/15/2015 105,000.00 0.550% 17,380.00 122,380.00 139,760.00 _01/15/2016 17,091.25 17.091.25 07/15/2016 105,000.00 0.800% 17091.25 122.091.25 139,182.50 01/15/2017 16.671.25 16,671.25 07/15/2017 105,000.00 1.10059 16.671.25 121,671.25 138,342.50 01/15/2018 16,093.75 16.093,75 07/15/2018 ' 105,000.00 I .40059 16.093.75. 121,093.75 137,187.50 Gin srmi9 15,358.75 15,358.75 07/15/2019 105,000.00 I .65059 15,358.75 120,358.75 135,717.50 01/15/2020 - 14,492.50 14,492.50 07/15/2020 110.000.00 1.900% 14,492.50 124.492.50 138,985.00 01/15/2021 - 13.447.50 13,447.50 07/15/2021 110,000.00 2.150% 13.447.50 123,447.50 136,895,00 01/15/2022 12,265.00 12.265.00 07/15/2022 115.000.00 2.400% 12,265.00 127,265.00 139.530,00 01/15/2023 10,885.00 10,885.00 07/15/2023 115,000.00 2,60054 ... 10,885.00 .._ ... 125,885 00 136,770.00 01/13/2024 9.390.00 9,390.00 07/15/2024 120,000.00 2,75059 9,390.00 129,390.00 138,780.00 01/15/2025 .. 7,740.00 7,740,00 07/15/2025 120,000.00 2.900% 7,740.00 127,740.00 135.480.00 01/15/2026 6,000,00 6,000.00 .. - 07/ I 5/2026 125.000.00 3,05059 6,000,00 131;000.00 137,000.00 01/15/2027 4.093.75 4,093.75 07/15/2027 125,000.00 3.200% 4,093.75 129,093.75 133,187.50 01/15/2028 2,093.75 2.093.75 07/15/2028 125,000.00 3.350% 2,093.75 127,093.75 129,187.50 Total $'1,G35,000.00 $353,533.28 $1,988,533.28 Date And Term Structure Dated Delivery Date First Coupon Date First available call date Call Price Yield Statistics Bond Year Dollars Average Life Average Coupon Net Interest Cost (NIC) rue Interest Cost (Tic) All Inclusive Cost (,AIC) IRS Form 8038 Net Interest Cost Weighted Average Maturity Bond Yield for Arbitrage Purposes GO 2013A Rev 4 I GO Improvement I 726/2013 11:25 AM 10/01/2013 10/01/2013 7/15/2014 813,644.83 8.345 Years 2.5909681%. 2,7407501% 2.7306632% 2.8489700% 2.5909681% 8.345 Years 2.8686704% Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance $1,025,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 201 3A Water Revenue Portion Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon interest Total P+I Fiscal Total. 10/01/2013 07/15/2014 40.000.00 0.300% 19,795.19 59,795.19 59.795.19 01/15/2015 12,486.25 12.486,25 07/15/2015 50.000.00 0.550% 12,486.25 62,486.25 74,972.50 01/15/2016 - 12.348.75 12,348.75 07/15/2016 50,000.00 0.800% 12,348.75 62,348.75 74,697.50 01/15/2017 12.148.75 12,148.75 07/15/2017 50.000.00 1.10016 12,148.75 62,148.75 74,297.50 01/15/2018 11,873.75 11,873.75 07/15/2018 55,00(1.00 1.4009.; 11,873.75 66,873.75 78.747.50 01/15/2019 11,488.75 11,488.75 07/15/2(119 55,000.00 1.650% 11.488.75 66.488.75 77,977.50 01/15/2020 11,035.00 11,035.1)0 07/15/2020 55,000.00 1.900% 11,035.00 66,035.00 77,070,00 01/15/2021 10,512.50 10.512.50 07/15/2021 55,000.00 2.1.5014 10,512.50 65.512.50 76,025.00 01/15/2022 9,921.25 9,921.25 07/15/2022 60,000.00 2.40014 9.921.25 69,921.25 79,842.50 01/15/2023 9,201.25 9,201.25 07/15/2023 45,000.00 2.600% 9,201.25 54.201,25 63,402,5(1 01/15/2024 8,616.25 8,616.25 - 07/15/2(124 50,000.0(1 2.75014 8,616.25 58,616.25 67.232.5(1 01/15/2025 7.928.75 7.928.75 07/15/2025 50.000.00 2.90014 7.928.75 57,928.75 65,857.50 01/15/2026 7,203.75 7,203.75 07/15/2026 50.000.00 3.050% 7,203.75 57.203.75 64.407.50 01/15/2027 6,441.25 6.441.25 07/15/2027 50,000.00 3.200% 6.441.25 56,441.25 6/.882.50 01/15/202S .. 5,641.25 5,64.1.25 07/15/2028 50,000.00 3.350% 5,641,25 55,641.25 61,282.50 01/15/2029 • 4,803.75 4,803.75 07/15/2029 50.000.00 3.500% 4,803.75 54,803,75 59,607.50 01/15/2030 - 3,928.75 3,928.75 07/15/2030 50.000.00 3.600% 3,928.75 53,928,75 57,857,50 01/15/2031 - .3,028.75 3.028.75 - 07/15/2031 50,000.00 3.700% 3,028.75 53,028.75 56,057.50 01/15/2032 - 2.103.75 2.103.75 07/15/2032 55,000.00 3.800% 2,103.75 57.103,75 59.207.50 01/15/2033 1,058.75 1,058.75 - 07/15/2033 55,000.00 3.850°4. 1.058.75 56.058.75 57,117.50 Total $1,025,000.00 GO 2013A Rev 4 ; GONNater Revenue I 7126/2013 1 11:25 AhA S323,337.69 811,348,337.69 Northland Securities Inc. PUbliC Finance $3,065,000.00 City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota General Obligation Bonds, Series 2013A Sewer Portion Debt Service Schedule Date Principal Coupon Interest Total P+I Fiscal Total, 10/m12013 - 07/15/2014 135,000.00 0.300% 58,646.00 193,646.00 193,646.00 01/15/2015 36,967.50 36,967.50 07/15/2015 150.000,00 0,550% 36,967.50 186,967.50 223,935.00 01/15/2016 36,555.00 36,555.00 07/15/2016 155.000.00 0.800% 36,555.0(1 191,555,00 228.110.00 01/15/2017 35,935,110 35,935,00 07/15/2017 155,000.00 1,100% 35,935,00 190,935,00 226,870.00 01/15/2018 35.082,50 35.082,50 07/15/2018 160,000.00 1.400% 35,082.50 195.082,50 230,165.00 01/15/2019 33,962.50 33,962.50 07/15/2019 160,000.00 1.650% 33,962.50 193,962.50 227,925.00 01/15/2020 32,642.50 32,642.50 07/15/2020 160,000,00 1.900% 32,642.50 192,642.50 225.285,00 01/15/2021 31,122.50 31,122.50 07/15/2021 160,000.00 2.150% 31,122.50 191,122.50 222,245.00 01/15/2022 29.402.50 29,402.50 07./15/2022 160.000.00 2.400% 29,402.50 189,402.50 218,805.00 01/15/2023 27,482.50 27,482.50 07/15/2023 140,000.00 2.60054 27.482.50 167,482.50 194,965.00 01/15/2024 25.662.50 25,662.50 07/15/2024 145,000.00 2.750% 25,662.50 170,662.50 196,325,00 01/15/2025 23.668.75 23,668.75 07/15/2025 145,000.00 2.900% 23,668.75 168.668.75 192,337.50 01/15/2026 21.566.25 21,566.25 07/15/2026 145,000.00 3.050% 21.566.25 166,566.25 188.132.50 01/15/2027 19,355.00 19,355.00 07/15/2027 150.000.00 3.20051) 19.355.00 169,355.00 188,710.00 01/15/2028 16,955.00 16,955.00 07/15/2028 150,000.00 3.35054 16.955,00 166,955.00 183,910.00 01/15/2029 14,442.50 14.442.50 07/15/2029 150,000,00 3.500% 14,442.50 164,442.50 178.885.00 01/15/2030 11,817.50 11,817.50 07/15/2030 155,000.00 3,600% 11,817.50 166,817,50 178.635.00 01/15/2031 9,027.50 9,027.50 07/15/2031 155,000,00 3.700°..O 9.027.50 164,027.50 173,055.00 01/15/2032 - 6.160.00 6,1.60.00 07/15/2032 165,000,00 3.500% 6.160.00 171.160.00 177,320.00 01/15/2033 3,272.50 3.272.50 07/15/2033 170,000.00 3.850% 3,272.50 173,272.50 176,545,00 Total S3.065.000.00 i960,806.00 S4,025,806.00 GO 2013A Rev 4 I GO Sewer Revenue I 7l26/2013 I 11:25 AM Northland Securities Inc. Public Finance Page 7 THF CrTY OF KE FLMO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: 8/06/2013 AGENDA ITEM: Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension — Discussion and Consideration of Project Alternatives SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Chad Isakson, Project Engineer SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: 15 Introduction of Item City Engineer Report/Presentation City Engineer Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTIONREQUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to review the options for moving forward regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project, and provide direction to staff. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to direct staff to take to,following actions regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project: 1. Award the Contract to the lowest responsible bidder and absorb additional costs funded through the Sewer Enterprise Fund. 2. Rebid the project as an "add alternate" to the Section 34 Water and Sewer Project. 3. Reject ali bids and wait to complete Phase 1 and Phase 2 together when the County resurfaces Olson Lake Trail (in 2015 or 2016). 4. Rehear the project and consider raising the assessment amount levied against the benefitting property owners to cover the additional construction costs. BACKGROUND: The Olson Lake Trail. Sanitary Sewer Extension project was initiated by a petition for municipal sewer service from two properties located in the City of Oakdale. Upon receipt of the petition, Oakdale contacted the City of Lake Elmo to inquire interest by Lake Elmo properties to be served by the Oakdale sewer system and thereby share in the project costs. Following several meetings with the Lake Elmo property owners and the City of Oakdale, the City of Lake Elmo authorized the preparation of a joint Feasibility Report to investigate feasibility and costs for the project. The Feasibility Report was presented and approved at the February 19, 2013 council meeting, and amended to include one additional property on March 19, 2013. The key recommendations outlined in the Feasibility Report are as follows: Design and construct an initial project in 2013 to respond to immediate sewer needs of the Oakdale properties and at least one Lake Elmo property. This project would extend sewer north approximately 580 feet and would be constructed in the boulevard of CSAH 13 without disturbing the roadway surface. The Project would serve 5 Lake Elmo properties and 2 Oakdale properties. Coordinate Phase 2 sewer extension to 50'1' Street N. to be constructed together with a future County Resurfacing Project (anticipated in the County CIP for 2014-2016). Phase 2 would serve an additional 11 Lake Elmo properties and 7 Oakdale properties. Treat TOTAL project as one for assessment purposes. All properties, in Oakdale and Lake Elmo, in Phase 1 and Phase 2, would be assessed equally in the amount of $18,500. Assessments would be levied over 15 years. The unit assessment would be increased for inflation by $500 each year. The Feasibility Report estimated project cost was $141,000 ($109,000 Elmo's share of the project costs being $100,715 (5/7ths). Lake Elmo intended to assess $92,500 ($18,500 unit assessment against 5 amount to be carried by the city until after Phase 2 was completed. STAFF REPORT: construction), with Lake properties), the remaining BID RESULTS AND ANALYSIS: Contractor bids were received on June 27 for the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project. Six bids were received ranging from $158,300 to $285,256. The Engineer's post -design construction cost estimate as competed by SEH. Inc. was $109,000. Staff has completed a thorough review of the bids and has determined that the main factor in this high hid was the small size of the project. Staff has also reviewed the project with the apparent low bid contractor and no additional savings is evident through a redesign. Therefore, one of the potential options that staff does not recommend is rebidding this Phase 1 project by itself. After factoring in all the project costs the project is running $54,700 over budget. Because the first phase includes 5 Lake Elmo properties and 2 Oakdale properties, the Lake Elmo share of the overage would be (5/7 of the cost) $39,100 if the project was awarded to go forward. OPTIONS MOVING FORWARD: Because this is a joint project with the City of Oakdale, the options moving forward need to be mutually agreed to by both cities. Staff has continued conversations with Oakdale staff to identify and vet through the pros and cons of various options. Staff will present the options outlined below more thoroughly at the council meeting. 1. Award contractor bid to get the Phase 1 sewer installed as planned. Each city must absorb the additional costs from the sanitary sewer enterprise fund. Lake Elmo share would be $37,900 as described above. PRO: keeps the project moving forward and the residents happy who need sewer. Costs are known. CON: City sewer fund is not flush. Is the investment worth getting the project done? 2 Reject the bid and rebid the project together with the Section 34 Water and Sewer project (Lennar Utility project). This is a high risk/high reward alternative. PRO: Potential to receive lower bids by attaching the project to a much larger, more attractive project. Could move project ahead and save money (say up to $30,000). CON: Will cost additional money to rebid (est. $4,000). Contract documents must be converted from City of Oakdale to City of Lake Elmo and project agreement must be redone to identify Lake Elmo as lead entity. There is no guarantee of getting better bids, may sink additional costs with no benefit. 3. Cancel the Project and wait to complete Phase 1 and Phase 2 together when the county reconstructs Olson Lake Trail. PRO. We rebid project as a larger one time project and can rebid it during the off peak bid times. CON. The County continues to indicate that the road project will not occur until 2016. Lake Elmo residents continue to struggle with failing septic systems, with some potentially needing replacements. 4. Rehear the project (call new Assessment Hearing) with the intention of awarding the project but increasing the unit assessment amount so that no city costs are incurred due to the overage. Assessments would increase from $18,500 to $25,600 if spread across only the 5 properties for Phase 1. PRO: keeps the project moving forward and the residents happy who need sewer. Cost increases are born by the benefiting properties. Assessment hearing gives property owners opportunity to weigh in. CON: Increased costs to property owners are steep. Rehearing the project is expensive and complex; Project is delayed to allow Report to be amended to reflect new costs, and assessment hearing to be held to levy new assessments. Unlikely to please all property owners. ADDRESSING AFFECTED RESIDENTS: Staff has already contacted the 5 affected properties to notify them of the delay in the project award. Three properties have expressed a willingness to wait, one has expressed a need to connect, and one has not called back. Properties in Phase 2 have not yet been notified. They are not expecting a project for several years. Once staff has developed a direction for the project, all property owners will be notified by letter and a resident meeting will be scheduled. RECOMMENDATION: The City Council is respectfully requested to review the options for moving forward regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project, and provide direction to staff. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to direct staff to take to following actions regarding the Olson Lake Trail Sanitary Sewer Extension project: A ward the Contract to the lowest responsible bidder and absorb additional costsfunded through the Sewer Enterprise Fund. 2. Rebid the project as an "add alternate" to the Section 34 Water and Sewer Project. 3. Reject all bids and wait to complete Phase I and Phase 2 together when the County resurfaces Olson Lake Trail (in 2015 or 2016). 4. Rehear the project and consider raising the assessment amount levied against the benefitting property owners to cover the additional construction costs. ATTACHNIE:NT(S): . Project Location Map 316 LEGEND "7473,, 0.377-7,) LQQQj PROPOSED GRAVITY SEWER MAIN PROPOSED FORCEMAIN SERVICE STUB PROPOSED GRAVITY SERVICE STUB PROPOSED GRINDER STATION (LOCATION TBD) ASSESSABLE PROPERTY 9 100 200 ! Feet ENG CUS NEERING PROJ, NO. 2012.124 LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA OAKDALE, MINNESOTA MARCH, 2013 FIGURE NO, 2 PROPOSED 2013 SANITARY SEWER IMPROVEMENTS OLSON LAKE TRAIL SANITARY SEWER EXTENSION AMENDED REPORT THE CITY OF - LAKE ELIVIO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION Consider Planning Commission Appointment Adam Bell, City Clerk Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: 8/06/2013 16 Introduction of Item Staff Report/Presentation Staff Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is respectfully requested to consider making an appointment to the Planning Commission. The options before the Council are as follows: a) If the Council desires to approve the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as .1" Alternate on the Lake Elmo Planning Commission, effective immediately." b) If the Council desires to deny the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to deny the appointment of Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as Alternate on the Lake Elmo Planning Comntission, effective immediately." c) If the Council desires to further deliberate the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to postpone making any appointment until a later City Council Meeting." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: With the recent departures from the Planning Commission, including Mike Reeves appointment to the City Council, there are currently two positions open on that commission. It is recommended that the Council makes an appointment without too much delay so that the Planning Commission can be fully staffed and operational. Applicant Jill Lundgren recently applied for Nicole Park's vacant Council seat. She was interviewed for that position bur not selected for the Council appointment. All of the council applicants were encouraged to continue their pursuits of service to Lake Elmo. Staff received an application from Ms. Lundgren for the open Planning Commission seat and Council interviewed Ms. Lundgren immediately prior to this meeting. The question of her appointment is not before the Council, RECOIVIMENDAT1ON: Staff recommends that the City Council consider making an appointment to the Lake Elmo Planning Commission by choosing one of the following options. a) If the Council desires to approve the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to appoint Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as ist Alternate on the Lake Ehno Planning Commission, effective immediately." b) If the Council desires to deny the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to deny the appointment of Jill Lundgren of 8282 Hidden Bay Court North as 1 Alternate on the Lake Elmo Planning Conzmission, effective immediately." c) If the Council desires to further deliberate the appointment, it can do so by taking the following action: "Move to postpone making any appointment until a later City Council Meeting." ATTACHMENTS:, I. Planning Conunission Application City of Lake E]mo 3800 Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 651.777.5510 Fax 777.9615 APPLICATION FOR PLANNING COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS Date: =if Name 1/4-',. \\ \,..-,4...KNA.C..,q, Ce,--n --k-'7- Address 92:2,2),i-117)- \---'1.) X-::--.-5''---- ,'--k. ' 'V' (7. Phone Number W9 , ..irer. PI), (..(2.5) - V.- C10-0, )C5k, .\--cAt•-.Q..-- A*)1,i,\\(-,•C,1-CL'i..-3 'oL) ---;v•-) vv,,j_\_. i.;:-:-:' bi- V:- V \ (---v-`," - 1 What do you consider to be the major planning and developtriensues confronting the City of .., Lake Elmo,-.,TA,\._,(7c,...c.704--(9,:\y-v,A-\61-) ...) -` ''''' '-'''' ' -c--<.)-)i.0-Q... )10,,,e,,A , 7,,,A...(-..c3....k, „, 2. What a you see as the role and functioi the Plann_ing Conlm., ission--„ 0:.) \C\ -C7 C.CA C.,61:72A" Lc C 3, *-h, experience and qualifications do you have that you feel will contribute to the Pia c_loinmission's work and which will enable you to provide a ser\-1.-e in this regard. 1/4,J ‘CN'\ •k (:) 4, Mow much time do you have, or are you willing to devote tc) Platining Con-unissi&ctivitF. , ) S. What property or development interest, eider dit indirect, do vou have within Lake Elnio? C\en 21 Ca:- • Please complete and return to the City Office _