Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
04-16-13 CCMP
11 t: (Try Our Mission is to Provide Quality Public Services in a Fiscally Responsible Manner While Preserving the City's Open Space Character NOTICE OF MEETING City Council Meeting Tuesday, April 16, 2013 7:00 P.M. City of Lake Elmo I 3800 Laverne Avenue North AGENDA A. Call to Order B. Pledge of Allegiance C. Roll Call D. Order of Business E. Approval of Agenda F. Accept Minutes 1. Accept April 02, 2013 City Council Meeting Minutes G. Public Comments/Inquiries H. Presentations 2. Quality Star - Rick Chase Consent Agenda 3. Approve Payment of Disbursements and Payroll 4. Accept Financial Report dated March 31, 2013 5. Accept Building Permit Report dated March 31, 2013 6. Well No. 4 -Resolution Approving Plans and Specifications and Ordering Advertisement for Bids; Resolution 2013- 26 7. Amend Valley Cartage Tax Abatement Resolution; Resolution 2013- 27 8. Approve Wild Adventure Race Spring Sprint - Sunfish Lake Park/Lake Elmo Park Reserve Regular Agenda 9. Speak Your Peace Project; Resolution 2013-28 10. Approve Lake Elmo Wine Company Liquor License - Public Hearing 11. Valley Cartage Group, Inc. M1F - Public Hearing; Resolution 2013- 29 12. Water Surface Use Amendment; Ordinance 08-074 13. Zoning Map Update; Ordinance 08-075 14. Tree Preservation Ordinance; Ordinance 08-076, Resolution 2013- 30 15. Parking Regulations Ordinance Update; Ordinance 08-077, Resolution 2013- 31 16. Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements -Resolution Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract; Resolution 2013- 32 17. Authorize the distribution of Lennar's Environmental Assessment Worksheet to Environmental Quality Board K. Summary Reports and Announcements • Mayor • Council • Administrator • City Attorney • Planning Director • City Engineer • Finance Director • Clerk L. Adjourn LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES A����� ���� �r----'---- CITY OF LAKE ELM0 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02,2013 Mayor Pearson called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. PRESENT: Mayor Pearson, Council Members Bloyer, Nelson, and Smith y7-31PM] Also Present: City Administrator ZuJeger, Associate City Attorney 8rekkeo, Planning Director K!att' City Engineer Griffin, Finance Director Bendel, and City Clerk Bell. PLEDGE OF ALLIGENCE APPROVAL OF AGENDA MOTION: Council Member Nelson moved TO APPROVE THEAPRIL 02,2013 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA /%SPRES8NT0D. Council Member Bkoverseconded the motion. Motion passed 3'0. ITEM 1: ACCEPT MINUTES THE MARCR19\2013 CITY COUNCIL MINUTES WEREAyPROXED AS PRESENTED BY CONSENSUS OF THE CITY COUNCIL. PUBLIC COMMENTS Library Board Member Judy Gibson gave update onbook circulation Library hours have increased 10:OO&KX'2:0OPM Monday -Saturday & Tuesday/Thursday additionally from 3:OOPM'8:OOPK8. She noted that one rental space available. Contact Steve DcLapp for more information. Library is actively advertising for full time librarian position. For more information, contact personnel committee. Library isstill receiving bestseller donations, including DVDo. Ms. Gibson noted events at library include: East Metro Writers Room, m/bicb is open Mondays and Wednesdays from 8:]O/\K8to Noon. Also ou the first and third Fridays ofeach month, the library has story time for preschool children. Ms. Gibson noted celebration of National Library Week. Events include a b'e, book bag if patrons check out 3 books. On 4/4 Family Means financial counselor will speak about getting the most from tax refunds; Environcueota|/Sustainobility author VVi|\innn 3ouder visits on 4/11 at 6:30PyM; On 4/17 at7:0OPM a drop -in music jam; Oo4/18at6:30PM library will honor local authors; 4/25 at 3:UOPM library will celebrate National DEAR day (Drop Everything And Read). ITEM 2;NATIONAL LIBRARY WEEK APRUL 14'20 Page 1 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02,2013 ITEM3: COMMUNITY MEDIA WEEK &PRKL22'27 Council Member Bloyer read the proclamation for Community Media Week. The Council proclaimed April 22'27 as Community Media Week. Ramsey/Washington Counties Cable Commission is holding open house on4/Z5. PRESENTATIONS ITEM4. O0ALITY STAR PRESENTATION-RI[K CHASE Item was skipped due to award recipient Rick Chase not able to attend. lTEM 5: LAKE ELMO JAYCEES Sarah Quick represented the Lake Elmo Jaycees, She noted that this is the 43rd year of partnership between the City and the Jaycees. Ms. Quick presented adonation o[$8,OOOtothe City iogratitude for partnership. There was a discussion of the amount and vvberp it will be used. It was reported that last year's donation was |csn and that it usually is used for Lake £]cuo Days. The Council thanked the Jaycees. ITEM 6:8O0TH WA8HINGTON WATERSHED DISTRICT, K4aUL Moore gave update for the watershed district. Also attending were managers Johnson (Woodbury), Madigan. Mr. Moore described the watershed area. It is essentially the Eagle Point Business Park. Working with Cottage Grove and Woodbury on different projects. Reported working with staff to develop web based viewer to obovv the geography contours. Mr. Moore also noted several 2012 accomplishments. Worked with Newport drainage rate; Trout Brook water quality improvements; Grey Cloud Island restoration. Mayor Pearson asked about rain gardens and expected need for maintenance. Mr. Moore said about 10 years is estimated length of time for maintenance to be needed. It is important to get root system established. CONSENT AGENDA 7. Approve Payment o[Disbursements and Payroll o[$9Z'76I.O8 8. ZOl3Seal Coat Project -Amp,ovoP|ausand3Red0catouoandAutborize Advertisement for Bids; Resolution 2013-23, Agreement MOTION: Council Member Blover moved TO APPROVE THE CONSENT AGENDA AS PRESENTED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 3'0. REGULAR AGENDA. Page 2 of 7 LAKE EXMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ^�r~~~~~-'~~~13 ITEM 9: STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY - RESOLUTION APPROVING 0WNDOT AGREEMENT NO. 03330 City Engineer Griffin gave summary of grant agreement. Grant amount is for 80% of total amount of S80'000=$64,000.City will bcresponsible for balance oF$16.O0O. Tbc,c will beaminimum of two workshops as well as community meetings. It is meant to be a collaborative project. Council Member Nelson asked about outcome o[survey and how tn get state to be in City's favor. Mr. Cci[bo said the goal is to work with the state to come up with plans and bring proposal to state. MuUOTvvU| be atthe table at various points so there is o product with their buy in. City Administrator %u|eger noted that the study provides an updated view and stressed that itwould becollaborative. The inclusion in [it's ClP was discussed. Mr. GdOio reported that itwas not because there is no specific project approved. Council Member Nelson asked where money will come from. Finance Director Bendel reported her belief that it comes out Capital Fund as it is drafted. Mr. 3ulegerstated that because itisastudy, itactually will come out o[the UodeoiguatcdFund orGeneral Operating Fund. Ms. Bendel noted that the Contingency Fund in the budget is in hert for these types o[itenno. Current Contingency Fund balance isabout $lZO,DOO. Council Mcnoboz B\oyor asked about timeline and i[project will start during the current couod|'s terms? K4c Griffin stated that there needs to be a plan in order to obtain funding. The timing depends oofunding. Council Member Smith arrived at 7:31 P. M, |twas pointed out that atsome point 36isplanned tnbecome a freeway. Council Member Nelson noted while he's not in favor of spending the funds, this is the time to provide input and have a role in planning. Mayor Pearson noted that while some people may not be happy with the study results, itiximportant tooffer aplan atthis stage. MOTION: [ouodY Member Pearson moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2013-24, APPROVING THE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AGREEMENT NO. 03330FOR THE FEDERAL AID FUNDING FOR STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. Council Member Snobb noted that her main concerns are safety and improving access Also, it was noted that reducing cut -through traffic is important. Page 3nf 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02, 2013 ITEM 10: STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY - AUTHORIZE MAYOR AND ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE TASK ORDER NO. 1 FOR SRF CONSULTING SERVICES. INC. FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES. City Engineer Griffin explained that this was the task order for the previous item authorizing the Highway 36 Frontage Road Study. The amount of the expenses and the responsible portions was discussed and clarified. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE TASK ORDER NO. 1 TO SRF CONSULTING SERVICES, INC. FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES FOR THE STATE HIGHWAY 36 SOUTH FRONTAGE ROAD STUDY IN AN AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED $64,500, Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 11: APPROVE FUND BALANCE/NET ASSETS POLICY City Administrator Zuleger explained the policy and the reasoning for establishing it. It is standard for municipalities to adopt a fund balance use policy. Mr. Zuleger highlighted major sections. Driving factors for adoption include affecting bond rating and having a disciplined policy as the City moves into a stage of growth. Adoption will strengthen the internal controls surrounding the use of these funds and provide clear direction to staff on the monitoring and reporting surrounding those funds. Finance Director Bendel noted Enterprise Fund item #3(periodic rate review) as an item that Council will appreciate. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE THE FUND BALANCE/NET ASSETS POLICY AS PRESENTED. Council Member Bloyer seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4-0. ITEM 12: APPROVE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY City Administrator Zuleger explained the policy and the reasoning for establishing it. Having a policy in place is important during accelerated periods of growth, as it prevents the City from over- extending itself. Mr. Zuleger highlighted the 12 policy statements emphasizing that several of the policies will have a beneficial impact on City's bond rating. The City will maintain a Five -Year Capital Improvement Plan (CIP). It will be need based, not wants based; 2. The City will restrict long-term borrowing to planned capital improvements, as included in the CIP, and a limited use of short-term debt for capital outlay and acquisition. On all projects, at least 50% of the principal will be retired within 10 years; 3. The City will not use long-term debt for current operations; 4. The City will strive to maintain a "pay-as-you-go" capital funding policy, supporting capital spending without use of debt whenever feasible; 5. The City recognizes that for certain projects that the use of debt may be of overall financial benefit to the City and that all projects should be evaluated to determine whether debt financing is the appropriate choice at the time of authorization; Page 4 of 7 1. LAKE ELMK0CITY COUNCIL MINUTES 6, The City will pay back debt within o period not to exceed the expected useful life of the projects, typically atorbelow 20ycars; 7. Direct net debt not to exceed 3% of total market value of taxable property in the City; 8. The City will manage debt issuance plans and structuring of debt service to strive to maintain a total debt service levy that is less than Z596the City'x total combined certified property tax levies; 9. The City will maintain good communications with bond rating agencies regarding its financial condition, including full disclosure inevery report; lO. When feasible the City will use refunding mechanisms to reduce interest cost; 11. During the annual budget process, a debt study will be prepared in conjunction with the CIP toprovide information about the City'nplanned debt structuring; 12. Refunding and advance refunding savings opportunities will bemonitored, and action will betaken when determined tohcfinancially advantageous. Prepayment of debt was explained. Council Member Nelson asked about total current dchL K4c %ulegerotated it is currently under 15%= 14.3'4. Street/sewer/water (enterprise) debt does not impact property tax levy. The target n[Z59h was discussed, Mc %u\rgcr explained that 259b was industry standard. It was explained that bond raters like to see no more than 25%. Recoverable charges were discussed. Alternative Urbau&,cawidc Kcvicvv (\DAR) will require us to posy an ordinance. There will be an amount n[AUAR that will not be recovered. Council K4eozbcr Srudb stated that the council may have been under the impression that the /\U&Rwas going to be 100% recoverable. Mr. Griffin said the original design of the forcemain might be part of $lcnU\ioo figure Council remembers. Mayor Pearson asked about the practice of saving and taxing for future benefits that may not he realized. Mr. 7u|cCersaid ittypically isnot ocommon practice. GFO&Industry moved from sinking fund to$25,OOOthreshold and lO'ycaruseful life. MOTION: Council Member J/ndh moved TO APPROVE THE DEBT MANAGEMENT POLICY AS PRESENTED. Council Member Nelson seconded the motion. MOTION PASSED 4'0. ITEM 13:ADOPT 1'94 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE Planning Director K]att explained this was a request for Council to formally adopt the 1'94 comp plan. Mr. Klatt explained the history of the development of the comp plan, The Metropolitan Council had very positive reaction. The Met Council agreed tnamend the Memorandum of Understanding. /\n)codnoeot will provide an additional 5 years for planning and build -out. New target date is 2015 with penalties beginning in 20I6. Amendment also gave Mot Council Regional Administrator authority to negotiate with city. Mr. Klatt noted that the Village Plan will be coming back to Council soon for formal adoption as well. In order to not cause any confusion, the other portions were not included. Mr. Klatt outlined the next steps will roa|o}y involve changes tozVuio�ouap, including several holding zones. These are Page Sof7 LAKE ELMA0CITY COUNCIL MINUTES ������ ���� ^�r~~~--~^~~~~~ sites that are planned to receive city services, and therefore no development will be allowed uudD those services are provided. Council K4anlbor Smith inquired about the number n[uo'scwered households. She is concerned about overshooting 24,000 target. Mr. Zuleger noted that the City plans on reducing the number Lo 30'000 and extending the target date to 2040. As soon asthe Village Plan is approved by Met Council, those types o[negotiations are planned tobcstarted. Council Member Smith asked to be part o[those negotiations. Mayor Pearson said bcwould insist she beincluded. Council K8co`bcr Nelson asked about 100' bufher. It was noted that itis in conflict with the Village Plan that was recently adopted. KYc K]attexplained that this isspecifically for l'g4and when the Village Plan isbrought back, those types ofchanges should hemade. Amending the proposed plan to allow manufacturing was discussed. C000d| Member Nelson expressed his desire for the addition of heavy manufacturing in order to be flexible. Mr. Klatt said that the issue can be addressed at v later point through zoning regulations to a|\ovv this in the future if desired. The Conditional Use classification was also discussed. It was noted that certain heavy manufacturing uses often poses potential nuisance issues, such as heat, glare, odor, noise, etc. Council Member Smith stated she recalls that the number of jobs was considered when manufacturing was discussed, i.e. businesses involving large machinery versus high number of workers. This may have tochange with the advancement uftechnology. Council Member Nelson reiterated his desire to be friendly to businesses and not be overly restrictive without knowing what the next manufacturing development may include. MOTION: Council Member Smith moved TO APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2013-025, ADOPTING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAKE ELMO 2030 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN. Seconded by Council Member Bloyer. MOTION PASSED 4-0. SUMMARY REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS Council Member B0wyerreported stopping and speak to neighbors phone calls with residents. Wants the community to remember to be grateful for living in Lake Elmo. He hopes that future discussions are positive, Mayor Pearson reported onerhog with Mr. Griffin, Mr. Zu)eger, Mr. Johnson, and Mr. K[att to discuss obtaining funding for the crosswalk on Highway 5, Council Member Smith - Lake Elmo Days committee has begun meeting to plan event. Scheduled VVbeclbnosc for Saturday; Ken VVaoovicbwiD beplaying during the day. Event will include Battle of the Bands. September 6 & 7m. &|vvayn looking for volunteers. Explained the membership of the group; Commended Clerk Bell on the minutes ' best minutes in D years. They were dcor and concise; Also gave kudos to'4k/ssaMcLeod for newsletter. Best newsletter she ever seen. Thanked staff for hard work. Page 6 of 7 LAKE EDM0>CITY COUNCIL MINUTES April 02"2013 Council Member Nelson _ooreport. City Administrator Zulegar gave overview of revised workshop schedule and subject matter; delivering Minnesota Investment Fund grant to MN -DEED on Valley Cartage den[ Met with Rep. McCollum staff on ground water issues; Two properties are going to prosecution. Going tobetaking a drainage tour with Planner Johnson; Working on lake issues and park issues; Working with MN Land Trust regarding Conservation Easement for Sunfish Lake Park and management plans; Park survey sub -committee ismeeting. Council Member B|nycrexpressed his opinion that electors had differing expectations of park use. Would like legal counsel to look at eminent domain as possible way to get land back. Council Member Smith noted the bard work done on preserving the laud. She gave examples of opposing the placement of a water tower and public works building. However, she still wants the park used. She did want some active use in Area Two, and if Conservation Easement prohibits that, Lbeu it is in violation of what council intended at the time. She stated that there was supposed to be 5 acres set aside to include a skating rink, etc. It was always the intent to have the five acres used for active - would like apavilion and picnic area. Not ever meant for area tonot bc used orclosed off. Wants tosee more people use the park. The acquisition of the land and the adoption of the easement and what options are available to alter or modify the usage was discussed. It was pointed out that amending the easement or developing a nnauaOcnncnt plan were available remedies. Private and public conservation easements iothe City were discussed. City Attorney Brekken reported working on property clean op action; stated he would pass on Council Member Bloyer's comments regarding Sunfish Lake Park to City Attorney Snyder. Planning Director &{lmtt reported upcoming \/i|(agc planning vvncksbnp involving parking standards. Planning comm. looked atVillage mixed use ordinance. Preliminary plat expected soon; 0n4/13atq/\K4planning vvebivar. City Engineer Griffin reported state Highway S funding program from K4oDO7. This is a tight deadline, but trying tomake the deadline. school crosswalk. Finance Director Bendel Nareport, City Clerk Bell reported that "good meetings make good minutes"; attended annual municipal clerk conference in 3t. Cloud; conducting research on park and lake use issues; working on a liquor license transfer; noted that there was another high school student inattendance tooi�bt, Meeting adjourned at85OP.M. ATTEST: Adam R. Bell, City Clerk Page 7 of 7 LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor K E Ar,eracomivm • MO MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 3 MOTION Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: Approve Disbursements in the Amount of $149,458.18 SUBMITTED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director REVIEWED BY: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $149,458.18. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operation. Below is a summary of current claims to be disbursed and paid in accordance with State law and City policies and procedures. Claim # Amount Description ACH $ 9,227.87 Payroll Taxes to IRS & MN Dept of Revenue 4/4/13 ACH $ 5,550.70 Payroll Retirement to PERA 4/4/13 DD4530— DD4550 $ 26,653.73 Payroll Dated 4/4/13 (Direct Deposits) 1930-1945 $ 960.00 Library Card Reimbursements 4/16/13 39769-39816 $ 107,065.88 Accounts Payable 4/16/13 TOTAL $ 149,458.18 STAFF REPORT: City staff has complied and reviewed the attached set of claims. All appears to be in order and consistent with City budgetary and fiscal policies and Council direction. RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda proposed disbursements in the amount of S149,458.18. Alternatively, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda or a particular claim from this item and further discuss and deliberate prior to taking action. If done so, the appropriate action of the Council following such discussion would be: "Move to approve the April 16, 2013, Disbursements as Presented land modified/ herein." ATTACHMENTS: Accounts Payable Dated 4/16/13 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS at- removed from the Consent Auendal: Questions from Council to Staff Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ......... ...... ....... ....... ........... ..... ..... Mayor & City Council Discussion ............ ........... ...................... .......... ....... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ....... ...... ............. ...... . ........ ............. ...... ........ Mayor Facilitates 2 Accounts Payable To Be Paid Proof List User: devise Printed: 04/11/2013 - 11:38 AM Batch: (103-04-2013 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # ADVANCED Advanced Eng & Environ Svs Inc 33751 04/10/2013 306.00 0,00 04/16/2013 Water system Design Phasing Study No 0000 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services AE2S 33751 Total: 306.00 33752 04/10/2013 423.57 0.00 04/16/2013 Production Well No4 AE2S Task No 0000 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services Order #2 33752 Total: 423.52 ADVANCED Total: 729.52 ALEXANDE Alexander Farrah STORMWATER20114/10/2013 601-000-0000-37100 Water Sales STORMWATER2012 'Iota]: ALEXANDE Total: 55.00 0.00 04/16/2013 SW Assessment rec'd atler cut off No 0000 adjust 55.00 55.00 ALLEGRA Allegra 48067 4/10/2013 146.61 0.00 04/16/2013 4 Part Adininistraive Citiations No 0000 101-42(1-240(1-42030 Printed Forms 48067 Total: 146.61 ALLEGRA Total: 146.61 AMDAHL Amdahl Chris 9655 04/1(1/2013 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 9655 Total: .AMDA111, Total: 109.65 0.00 04/16/2013 Rekcv Public Entrance, Station 41 No 0000 109.65 109.65 ARAM Aramark. Inc. 629-7704689 04/10/2013 25.54 0.00 04/16/2013 Uniforms- Invoice Date 3/14/13 No 0000 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-77(14689 lotal: 25.54 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) Page 1 Invoice # Inv Date 629-7714367 04/1(1/2(113 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7714367 Total: 629-77 [6193 04/10/20 13 I 01-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Matt Contractual Bldg 629-7716193 Total: 629-7716194 04/10/2013 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Mitint Contractual Bldg 629-7716194 Total: 629-7719197 04/10/2013 101-43(1-3100-44170 Uniforms 629-7719197 Total: ARAM Total: Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 25.54 0„00 04/16/2013 Uniforms Invoice Dated 3/28/2013 No 0000 25.54 51.83 0,00 04/16/2013 Linen City Hall No 0000 51,83 42.99 0.00 04/16/2013 Monthly Rug Service -Annex No 0000 42.99 /5.54 0.00 04/16/2013 Uniforms En voice dated 414/2013 No 0000 95.54 171,44 BATTY PE 13atteries Plus Woodbury. Corp 032-772897 04/10/2013 7.56 0.00 04/16/2013 Shop 13atteries No 0000 101-430-3100-42150 Shop Materials 032-772897 04/10/2013 64.62 0.00 04/16/2013 Trailer Brake Batteries No 0000 101-430-3100-42150 Shop Materials 032-772897 Total: 72.18 BATTY P L Total: 72.18 BENDEL Bendel Cathv 2012-HAS 04/10/2013 700„00 0.00 04/16/2013 2012 Reimbursement HSA No 0000 101-000-0000-21710 Ilealth 1 ISA 2012-HAS Total: 700.00 BENDEL Total: 700,00 BERTELSO 13ertelson's CP-WO-838018-1 04/10/2013 -1.38 0.00 04/16/2013 Return credit No 0000 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies CP-WO-838018-1 Total: -1.38 WO-845308-1 04/10/2013 77,48 0.00 04/16/2013 Planning No 0000 1(11-410-1910-42000 Office Supplies WO-845308-1 77.48 BERTEESO Total: 76.10 BUELOW Buelow Excavating 6714 04/10/2013 101-430-3125-43150 Contract Services 6714 Total: AP - To Ile Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 1.163.75 0.00 04/1612013 Corn ract Snow Plowing 3/5 & 3/14 L163.75 No 0000 Page 2 invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLinc # BUELOW Total: 1.163.75 C A C Companion Animal Control, I_L,C 4 04/10/2013 500.00 0,00 04/16/2013 Animal Control Services- March 101-420-2700-43150 Contract Services 4 04/10/2013 210.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Dog Pick Up / Impoundment 101-420-2700-43160 Impounding 4 Total: C A C Total: 710,00 710.00 (/ARDMEMB Carctmenther Service 03192013-VISA 04/10/2013 270.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Conference Regis vet/cast 21st Century 101-410-1910-44330 Ducs & Subscriptions PL 03192013-VISA Total: 270.00 03212013VISA 04/10/2013 5,00 0.00 04/16/2013 Parkine 2/26 I) Zuleger - :Viet Council 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 03212013VISA 04/10./2013 52.01 0.00 04/16/2013 Misc Meals 3/8 & 3/10 D ZuIcecr 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous 03212013VISA 04110/2013 26.07 0,00 04/16/2013 Office Supplies - Target Car Charger- 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies Zul 03212013V1SA 04/10./2013 410.00 0.00 04/16/2013 2013 MN Municipal Clerks Mbrship 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 03212013VISA 04/1072013 25.99 0,00 04/16/2013 Wall Street Journal Subscrip 3 Months 101-410-1320-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 032120 I3VISA 04/10/2013 180.00 0.00 04/1612013 CTC Program to mail out. Newsletter 101-410-1450-43090 Newsletter 03212013VISA 04/10/2013 249.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Alliance Innovation-Cust Scry Local 101-410-1450-44370 Conferences & Training_ Govt 03212013VISA Total: 948.07 165104-VISA 04/10/2013 60.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Lodging Ripley 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & Training 165104-VISA Total: 60.00 1868132135-V1SA 04/1012013 110.00 0.00 04116/2013 Shade Tree Short course Bodlovick 101-450-5200-44300 Miscellaneous 1868132135-VISA Total: I 10.00 2198-VISA 04/10/2013 21,00 0,00 04/16/2013 Repair Boot. Boot Polish 101-420-2220-44170 Uniforms 2198-VISA Total: 21.00 CARDMEIVII3 Total: 1.409.07 CARQUEST Car Quest Auto Parts 2055-284792 04/10/2013 101-430-3120-42210 Equipment Parts AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM / 36.05 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt Roller Filters No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 3 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 2055-284792 Total: 36.05 2055-284939 04/10/2013 11.41 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt Roller Filters I ()I-430-3120-42210 Equipment Parts 2055-284939 04/10/2013 62.76 0.00 (14/16/2013 Roller Oil 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel. Oil and Fluids 2055-284939 Total: 74.1 7 6971-345635 04110/2013 10.09 0.00 04/1612013 Idler Pulley 00-2 101-430-3100-44010 Repairs/IN/hint Bldg 6971-345635 04/10/2013 28.63 (1.00 04/16/2013 Antifreeze Trans fluid 101-430-3100-4212(1 Fuel., Oil and Fluids 6971-345635 Total: 38.72 CARQUE ST Total: 148.94 CENCOLLE Century College 499327 04/10/2013 635.00 0.00 0446/2013 Fire Officer 1 x 2 Cornell, Witter 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & 'Fraininc 499327 Total: 635.00 CENCOLLE Total: 635.00 COMCAST Comcast 03272013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44300 Miscellaneous 03272013 Total: COMCAST Total: CTYBLOOM City of Bloomington MARCH 2013 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-42270 Utility: System Maintenance MARCH 2013 Total: CTYBLOOM Total; CTYROSEV City of Roseville 217315 04/1(1/2013 101-410-1450-43 I 80 Information Tee mology/Web 217315 Total: CrYROSEV Total: DELAPP DeLapp Steve 03312013 04/10/2013 706-450-5300-42230 Building Repair Supplies 03312013 Total: AP - To 13e Paid Proof 1 .is t (04/11/13 - 11;38 AM) 7.92 0.00 04/1612013 Monthly Service - Fire Department 7,92 7,92 31.50 0.00 04/16/2013 Lab Bacteria Test 31,50 31.50 3.776.26 (1.00 04/16/2013 Monthly IT Services Billing April 2013 3.776.26 3.776,26 80.99 80.99 0.00 04/16/2(113 Reimb Building Rehah & Repair Supplies - No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 4 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # DE L„APP Total: 80.99 EJ-N4BROC Brockway Matthew PR1k1ARY - 12 04/10/2013 100.00 0,00 04116/2013 Election Judge 2012 Priman: No 0000 101-410-1410-43150 Contract Services PRIMARY - 12 Total: 100.00 EJ-NIFIROC 'Fowl: 100.00 EMBROIDM Embroirtme of Roseville E 20660 04/1012013 45.48 0.00 04/16/2013 Adinin-Beckie's Shirt. No 0000 101-410-1320-44300 Miscellaneous E 20660 04/10/2013 45.48 0.00 04/16/2013 Finance - Mike G Shirt No 0000 101-410-1520-44300 Miscellaneous E 20660 Total: 90.96 EMBROI DM Total: 90,96 EMERGA UT Emergency Automotive tech. Inc 21598 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 21598 Total: ERGAUT Total: ENVLNTIS Enventis 738507 04012013 04/10/2(113 101-410-1940-432 I 0 Telephone 738507 04012013 Total: ENVENTIS Total: 148.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Repair Emergency Lights on (NI No 0000 148.00 148,00 53.89 0.00 04/16/2013 Telephone/Data Sc 'ice City hall April - 53.89 53.89 No 0000 rocus Focus Engineering. Inc. 543 & 545 04110/2013 3.722,29 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering No 0000 101-410-1930-43030 Engineering Services 543 & 545 04/1012013 1.801.00 0.00 04116/2013 General Engineering No 0000 101-41(1-1910-43030 Engineering Services 543 & 545 Total: 5„513.29 545 04110/2013 943.50 0.00 04/1612013 General Engineering VRA No 0000 101-420-2400-43030 Engineering 545 04/1012013 2,199.38 0.00 0411612013 General Engineering VRA No 0000 101-410-1910-43030 Engineering Services 545 04110/2013 787.50 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA No 0000 1(11-430-3100-43030 Engineering Services AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04111.'13 - 11:38 AM) Page 5 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 545 04710/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 545 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering. Services 545 04/10/2013 603-496-9500-43030 Engineering Services 545 Total; 546 04/10/2013 409-48(1-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 546 Total: 547 04/10/2013 409-4 000-43030 Engineering Services 547 Total; 548 04/10/2013 413-480-8(10(1-43030 Engineering Services 548 Total; 549 04/10/2013 420-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 549 Total: 550 04/10/2013 419-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 550 Total: 551 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 551 Total: 552 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 552 Total: 553 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 140.50 475,00 2,527.00 7,072.88 1,186.77 360,00 1.036,00 2,765.45 531.00 29.50 442,50 1,566.50 7,917,72 135.00 135.00 135.00 135,00 177.00 177.00 74.28 74.28 1,285,00 1.285,00 59.00 59,00 2.187,20 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0.00 04/16/2013 General Engineering VRA 0.00 04/16/2013 Transportation & Traffic Systems 0,00 04/16/2013 Street Maintenance 0.00 04/16/2013 0.00 04/16/2013 0,00 04/16/2013 0.00 04/16/2013 Capital Improvement Planning 2013 Seal Coat Project Trunk Highway 36 Corridor Planning VINDot Hilton Trail Interchange 0.00 04/16/2013 State Hwy5 Traffic Muni Safety Improve 0.00 (14/16/2013 Municipal Aid System 0,00 04/16/2(113 Sanctuary 0.00 04/16/2013 Lake Elmo Area Village Eng. Support 0,00 (14/16/2013 10th Street Infrastructure Planning 0,00 04/16/2013 Demontreville Highlands Area Street Impr 0.00 04/16/2013 Olson lake frail Sewer Extenion Feasi hi I 0,00 04/16/2013 1n ()oil Ave Trunk Waterman 0,00 04/16/2013 Keats Ave Watermain 43?-1) No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 (1000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 MOO 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 6 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pnit Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 553 04/102013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 553 *Total: 554 04/10/2013 203-490-9070-43030 Engineering Services 554 Total: 555 04/1012013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 555 Tomli 556 04/10/2013 409-480-8000-43030 Engineering Services 556 Total: 557 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 557 Total: 558 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43030 Engineering Services 558 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43030 Engineering Services 558 Total: FOCUS Total: GIBSON,' U Gibson Judv 03292013 04110/2013 206-450-5300-44330 Dues & Subscriptions 03292(113 Total: GIBSON,141 Total: JOHNSON& Johnson & Turner Attorneys 28019 04/10/2013 101-420-2150-43045 Attorney Criminal 28019 Total: 28025 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43040 Legal Services 28025 Total: 28398 28402 04/10/2013 101-410-1320-43040 Legal Services 28398 28402 Total: 28399 04/10/2013 I 01-410-1320-43(140 Legal Services 28399 Total: JOHNSON& Total: AP - To 13' Paid Proof List (04/11/13 - 11:38 AM) 2.899.30 5,086,50 5.307,00 5.307.00 6,456.36 6,456.36 883.50 883,50 842.50 842.50 380.20 570.30 950.50 41.9(15.53 132,00 132.00 132.00 4.239.50 4.239,50 72.50 72.50 3.464,50 3.464.50 2.442.00 2.442.00 10.218,50 0,00 04/16/2013 Keats Ave Street 57% 0.00 04/16/2013 Lennar 1-94 West Corridor 0.00 04/16/2013 LE Ave Infrastructure 194 to 30th Street 0.00 04/16/2013 Water System funding. activities Deeds) 0,00 04/16/2013 Production Well Number 4 0.00 04116/2013 Section 34 Water 40% 0.00 04/16/2013 Section 34 Sewer Extension 60(4/0 0.00 04116/2013 Pioneer Press Newspaper Subscription 0.00 04/16/2013 Legal Services Prosecution 0,00 04/16/2013 Legal Services 31\4 0,00 04/1612013 Legal services - Civil 0.00 04/16/2013 Legal Services Detachment Petition No No No No No No No No No No No No 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 0000 Page 7 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # JOHNSONI3 Johnson Brian 04062013 04/1012013 101-420-2220-44040 Repairs/Maint Eqpt 040620 13 Total: JOHNSON B Total: LLCM. Lake Elmo oil, Inc. 03312013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-12120 Fuel. Oil and Fluids 03312013 Total: 288888 04110/2013 101-430-3120-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 288888 Total: LE011, Total: 67.f 9 0.00 04/16/2013 Reimbursement Vehicle Cleaning No 0000 Supplies 67.69 67.69 190.50 0,00 04/1612013 Fuel 190.50 60,00 60,00 250.50 0.00 04/16/2013 Fuel No No 0000 0000 Lillie NoNspapers Inc. Lillie Suburban 03292013 04/10/2013 47.30 0.00 04/16/2013 3/6 Notice - Olson Lake Trail No 0000 101-410-1450-43510 Public Notices 03292(113 04/10/2013 103.20 0.00 0411612013 3/20 Notice - Keats Avenue No 0000 101-110-1450-43510 Public Notices 03292013 04/10/2013 70.40 0.00 04/16/2013 3/20 Ordinance 408-071 No 0000 I 01-110-1320-43510 Legal Publishing 03292013 04/10/2013 112.20 0.00 04116/2013 3/20 Ordinance (108-072 No 0000 1(11-410-1320-43510 Legal Publishing 03292013 04/10/2013 26.40 0,00 04716/2013 3/27 Notice - Planning Commission No 0000 101-410-I450-43510 Public Notices (13292013 Total: 359.50 LillieLiHie lijlal: 359.50 I.OFF Loftier Companies. Inc. 1548046 04/10/2013 511.63 0.00 04/16/2013 Copy Machines Overage & Base 3110- No 0000 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt 4/9 1548(146 Total: 511.63 LOFT Total: 511,63 MAW() MAHCO APRIL 12 2013 04/10/2013 101-420-2400-44370 Conferences & Training APRIL 12 2013 Total: MAI1CO rota': AP - ft) Be Paid Proof List 0.14111/13 - 11:38 AM) 95.00 0.00 0411612013 MAI1CO Spring Training 4/12 No 0000 I lazardous 95.00 95.00 Page 8 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # MARONEYS Maroney's Sanitation. Inc 473549 04/10/2013 108.32 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -City Hall 101-410-1940-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 47.68 0,00 04/1612013 Waste Removal -fire 101-420-2220-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 207,82 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -Public Works 101-430-3100-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 207.82 0.00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -Parks 101-450-5200-43840 Refuse 473549 04/10/2013 48.12 0,00 04/16/2013 Waste Removal -Library 206-450-5300-43840 Refuse 473549 Total: 619.76 MARONEYS Toial: 619.76 METCOU Metropolitan Council 1013787 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43820 Sewer Utility - Met Council 1(113787 Total: METCOU Total: No MOO No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 1.484.55 0,00 04/16/2013 Monthly Wastewater Service - May No 0000 1,484.55 1,484.55 MURRYREN Murray Renee 03312013 04/10/2013 169.94 0.00 04/16/2013 Books for Collection No 0000 206-450-5300-42500 Library Collection Maintenance 03312013 Total: 169,94 MI.IRRYREN Total: 169.94 NCPERS 566200-NCPERS Minnesota 5662413 (14/10./2013 112.0(1 0.00 04/16/2013 April 2013 Deductions No 0000 101-000-0000-21708 Other Benefits 5662413 Total: 112.00 NCPERS Total: 112.00 NORT'HTOO Blue Tarp Financial 563059231 04/10/2013 451.99 0.00 04/16/2013 Pump Discharge Hoses No 0000 603-496-9500-42400 Small Tools 8.: Minor Equipment 563059231 Total: 451.99 NoRTivroo Total: 451.99 ON [CALL Gopher Stale One Call 60413 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-43150 Contract Services 100.00 0.00 04/1612013 Annuel Fec- Lines Locate No 0000 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04111113 - 11:38 AYII Page 9 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 60413 Total: 100.00 65874 04/10/2013 59.55 0,00 04/16/2013 FTP Tickets & Voice 101-430-3100-43 150 Contract Services 65874 Total: 59.55 ONECALI. Total: 159.55 No 0000 PIKEBUI3 Pike Bob 04012013 04/10/2013 46.41 0.00 04/16/2013 Paint supplies No 0000 706-450-5300-42230 Building Repair Supplies 04012013 04/10/2013 11.75 0,00 04/16/2013 Key made liar piano No 0000 206-450-5300-42230 Building. Repair Supplies 04012013 Total; 58,16 PIKEBOB Total: 58.16 PINKY Pinky's Sewer Service, Inc. 65569 04/10/2013 100,00 0.00 04/16/2013 Pumped 2 Septic Tanks No 0000 206-450-5300-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 65569 Total; 100,00 PINKY Total: 100.00 PITNEY Pitney Bowes 438240 04/10/2013 721.33 0.00 04/16/2013 Postage Rental & refills 2/15112/31/12 No 0000 101-410-1320-43220 Postage 438240 Total; 221.33 PITNEY Total: 221.33 REEDKATR Reed Katrina 04162013 04110/2013 101-000-0000-21710 I lealth 1-ISA 04162013 Total; REEDKATR Total: RIVRCOOP Ri‘ er Country Cooperative 03312(113 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-42120 Fuel, Oil and Fluids 03312013 Total; RIVRCOOP Total: AP - To Be Paid Proof List t04/1 I /13 - 11:38 AM) 96.00 0.00 04116/2013 BSA Day Care Re iinbursement No 0000 96.00 96.00 529,12 0.00 04/16/2013 Fuel 529,12 529.12 No 0000 Page 10 Invoice 14 Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # SCHWAAB Schwaab. Inc. C828I9 (14110/2013 79.25 0.00 04/16/2013 2 Self -Inking Signature Stamps 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies C82819 Total: 79.25 C84573 (14/10/2013 75.07 0.00 04/16/2013 Pre -Inked Notary Stamp & 2 Record 101-410-1320-42000 Office Supplies Bks C84573 Total: 75,07 SCI1WAAB Total: 154,32 SW/WC SW/WC Service Cooperatives 03/25/2013 04/1012013 24.759.00 0.00 04/16/2013 May 2013 Insurance Premiums 101-000-0000-21706 Medical Insurance 03/25/2013 Total: 24.759.00 SW/WC Total: 24,759,00 TASCH T.A. Schirsky & Sons Inc 54636 04/10/2013 230.85 0.00 04/16/2013 Asphalt 101-430-3120-42240 Street Maintenance Materials 54636 Total: 230.85 TASCH Total: 230.85 TOWNCTRY Town & Country Cleaning Co 413 630 04/10/2013 245,81 0.00 04/16/2013 April Janitorial Services 101-410-1940-44010 RepairsAlain( Contractual 1310g 413 630 Foal: 245.81 413 671 04/10/2013 187,47 0.00 04/16/2013 April Janitorial Service - Library 206-450-5300-44010 Repairs/Mahn 13Idg 413 671 Total: 187.47 TOWNCTRY Total: 433.28 VANGADOR Van g Adora Cable Operator 04/1012013 55.00 0.00 04116;2013 Cable Operations - 4/2/13 CC' Meeting 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 4hr Cable Operator Total: 55,00 Cable Operator] 04/10/2013 55.00 0.00 04/16/2013 Cable Operations-4/8/13 PC Meeting 101-410-1450-43620 Cable Operations 4hrs Cable Operator 1 Total: 55.00 VANGADOR Total: 110.00 AP - Be Paid Proof List (04/11;13 - 1138 AM) No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 Page 11 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pmt Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine wiTTER Witter Nicholas 04022013 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-44370 Conferences & Training 04022013 Total: WITTER Total: XCEL Xccl Energy 51-0117417-0 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-0117417-0 Total: 51-0630620-5 04/10/2013 206-450-5300-43810 Electric Utility 51-0630620-5 Total: 51-4504807-7 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 04/1012013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-4504807-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4504807-7 -Total: 51-4572945-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4572945-7 Total: 51-4576456-3 04/10/2013 I 01-420-2220-43810 Electric Utility 51-4576456-3 Total: 51-4580376-5 04110/2013 101-410-1940-43810 Electric Utility 51-4580376-5 04/10/2013 1(11-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-4580376-5 04/10/2013 101-410-1940-43810 Electric Utility 51-4580376-5 Total: 51-4733556-8 04/10/20 I 3 101-450-52(1(1-43810 Electric Utility 51-4733556-8 Total: 51-5044219-0 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-50442 I 9-0 Fotal: 51-5275289-3 04/10/2013 1(11-450-520(1-43810 Electric 1i6IiiUtility 51-5275289-3 Total: 51-5356323-8 04/10/2013 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility AP - To Be Paid Proof list (04/1 3 - 1138 AM) taMMINNI 49.72 0.00 04/16/2013 Mileage Reimbursement Officer No 0000 Training 49.72 49.72 26.09 0.00 04/16/20 I 3 425 Keats - Welcome Sign No 0000 26,09 569,04 0.00 04/16/2013 3537 Lake Elmo Ave - Library No 0000 569.04 78.41 0.00 04/16/2013 3509 Laverne Lights at Legion Pk No 0000 84.36 0.00 04/16/2013 8860 Hudson Iift station No 0000 32,80 0.00 04/16/2013 100 Inwood Traffic Lights No 0000 195.57 31.46 0.00 04/16/2013 3014 Jamley Street Lights No 0000 31.46 1,095.49 0,00 04./16/2013 4259 Laverne Fire Station #2 No 0000 1.095,49 215.62 0.00 04/16/2013 3800 Laverne - City Hall No 0000 29.83 0,00 (14/16/2013 100 Keats - T'raliic Lights No 0000 540.44 0,00 04/16/2013 3800 Laverne - City Hall No 0000 785.89 11.19 0.00 04/1612013 3510 Laverne - 1 ennis Court No 0000 11.19 257.28 0.00 04/16/2013 11 194 Upper 33rd - Parks Bldg No 0000 257.28 21.24 0,00 04116/2013 8170 Lake Jane Trail - Pebble Park No 0000 21,24 1,616,50 0.00 1)4/16/201.3 3303 Langly & 11975 55th Wells 1 & No 0000 Page 12 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine 51-5356323-8 Total: 51-5577337-7 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-5522332-2 Total: 51-5747685-4 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-5747685-4 Total: 51-5916043-7 04110/2013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-5916043-7 Total: 51-6429583-8 04/10/2013 602-495-9450-43810 Electric Utility 51-6429583-8 Total: 51-6433976-2 04/10/2013 101-420-2220-43810 Electric Utility 51-6433976-2 Total: 5 L-6625457-1 04/10/2013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-6625457-1 Total: 51-6736544-2 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-6736544-2 'Iota!: 51-6928283-3 04/10/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-6928283-3 Total: 51-6956201-4 04/1012013 101-450-5200-43810 Electric Utility 51-6956201-4 Total: 51-7538112-1 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-43810 Electric Utilitv 51-7538112-1 Total: 51-8126093-5 04/1012013 601-494-9400-43810 Electric Utility 51-8126093-5 Total: 51-8711719-3 04110/2013 101-430-3160-43810 Street Lighting 51-8711719-3 Total: XCE/1. Total: YALEMECH Yale Mechanical 155742 04/10/2013 101-430-3100-44010 RepairslYlaint Bldg 135742 Total: 1.616.50 42.74 0.00 04/1612013 998 Inwood - Traffic Lights 288.04 0.00 04/16/2013 3585 Laverne - Arts Center 19.87 0.00 04/16/2013 11062 34th Street - Lilt Station 17.25 OW 04/16/2013 2759 Legion Ave - Lift Station 509.11 0.00 04116/2013 3510 Laverne Fire Station /1 217.97 0.00 04/16/2013 3511 Laverne- Legion Park 2.119.87 0.00 04/16/2013 Street Lights 42,74 288.04 19.87 17.25 509.11 217.97 2,119.87 28.23 0.00 04/16/2013 11915 Stillwater Blvd- IVIanning&Sti I lwate 28.23 45.51 0.00 04116/2013 3675 Layton VFW 13allfield Lts 2,552.23 0,00 04/16/2013 3400 Ideal Public Works 195.89 0.00 04/16/2013 3445 [deal Ave Water Tower 2 45.51 7,557,73 195,89 12.33 0.00 04/16/2013 10901 Stillwater Blvd Speed Sign 1-1wy5 12.33 10,658.79 1.005.03 0.00 04/16/2013 Winter Contract Maim Serv-Public Wks 1,005.03 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0(100 No 0000 No 0000 No 0(100 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 No 0000 AP - To Be Paid Proof I Lst (04111113 - 11:38 AM) Page 1 3 Invoice # Inv Date Amount Quantity Pint Date Description Reference Task Type PO # Close POLine # 135743 04/10/2013 439.50 (400 04/16/2013 Winter Contract Maint Serv-Fire Sta 4.2 No 0000 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Ivlaint 131(1g 135743 Total: 439.50 135744A 04./10/2013 469.25 0.00 (14/16/2013 Winter Contract Maint Serv-Fire Sta 41 - No 0000 101-420-2220-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg I35744A Total: 469.25 1357-15 135800 04/10/2013 550.36 0.00 04/16/2(113 Winter Contract Maint Ser\—Cityl lall No 0000 101-410-1940-44010 Repairs/Maint Contractual 13Idg Anne 135745 135800 Total: 550.36 135792 04110/2013 246,25 0.00 04/16/2013 Winter Contract Maint Serv-Parks I31dg No 0000 101-450-5200-44010 Repairs/Maint Bldg 135792 Total: 746.25 Y Al. FM BCH Total: 2.710.39 Report Total: 107.065.88 AP - To Be Paid Proof List (04/11113 - 11:38 AM) Page 14 Ti tF C;11'Y ()1-7. AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION March 2013 Financial Reporting Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: MOTION 04/16/2013 4 SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: As part of its Consent Agenda, The City Council is asked to accept the March 2013 Financial Reporting Packet. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The City of Lake Elmo has fiduciary authority and responsibility to conduct normal business operations and report the financial (unaudited) statement to the City Council. City guidelines suggest the Council be updated on a regular basis. STAFF REPORT: Attached please find a report for March reflecting the monthly detail supporting the year to date actual results and comparing those results to the 2013 Budget. As of the end of the first quarter, the actual results are within 1°/0 of budg t. The most significant variances are highlighted below: Revenues: Building Permit revenue for the month exceeded budget by 27% and for the year by 62%. As mentioned in previous months, the growth trend has continued even during the winter and 8 new homes have been applied for to date in 2013 compared to 3 homes at this same time in both 2012 and 2011. Plan review fees continue to be strong as a result of the increased housing activity and are 48% above budget for the month and 63% above budget year to date. Expenses: Most departments are below budget for the month as all Departments continue to be very cost conscious. A few key items to note: Workers Compensation expense hit in March but was not budgeted until later in the year. These numbers will be seen in each department based on the historical work comp rating for each job classification. The dues and subscription expense reflected for the Mayor & Council represents the annual cost for memberships in the League of Minnesota Cities ($6,958) and the Association of Metropolitan Municipalities ($3,381). The memberships were budgeted later in the year based on when they were paid in 2012. We were able to publish the newsletter earlier than anticipated so the expense hit in February rather than March when it was budgeted in the Communications Department budget. Due to coordinating initial audit fieldwork earlier than last year, the initial interim billing expense for audit hit earlier than budgeted for 2013 in the Finance Department budget. The annual accounting software maintenance expense (Springbrook) was paid for in January but was budgeted for in March based on when it was paid in 2012. The Planning Department has incurred expenses above the amounts budgeted for Engineering and Contract Services. All excess expenses were approved by City Council (The Theming project with Damon Farber). As mentioned last month, the small tools and equipment account for the Fire Department includes $9,048 which was 100% reimbursed by WA County grant monies in March (for the purchase of laptop equipment for the fire vehicles). The Building repairs and maintenance expense is over budget to date in the Fire Department due to needing to replace two heaters in Firehouse #1 which were a safety risk. As expected as a result of the extended winter, the sand/salt and repairs and maintenance to equipment costs are above budget. Although these costs are not controllable, the Public works department did an excellent job of coordinating resources to minimize overtime. Please note that the salary expenses are based on more accurate departmental allocations than we had back in August when the budget was initially compiled. As a result, some departments are above budget, while others are under but overall, personnel expenses are below budget. 2 RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council receive the March monthly Financial Reporting Packet as part of tonio-ht's Consent Agenda. Alternately, the City Council does have the authority to remove this item from the Consent Agenda and further discuss and review. ATTACHMENTS: . March Financial Reports City of Lake Elmo 2013 By Month Budget to Actual Comparative As of March 31, 2013 101-General Fund Detail By Department 416/2013 MONTH YTD DEPT 410 - GEN'L C;ON'T BUDGET ACTUAL Variance ($) Variance (%) BUDGET ACTUAL Variance ($) Variance (%) Month Month Month Month YTD YTD YTD YTD REVENUE Current Ad Valorem Taxes 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0,00 (1.00 (LOW), Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Mobile Home Tax 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,110% Fiscal Disparities 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Penaliy & Interest on Taxes 0,00 0.00 (1.00 0.00'!4, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00'Yr, Liquor License 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00'V° 0.00 500.00 500.00 0.00% Wastchauler License 0.00 0.00 0,00 (1,0(M 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% General Contractor License 0.00 165.00 I 65,00 0,00% 0.00 165.00 165.00 (IMO% Ileating Contractor License 22(1.00 710.00 490.00 272.73% 1,785.00 2,400.00 61 5.00 34.45% Blacktopping Contractor License 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Building Permits 10,000.00 12,767,30 2,767,3(1 27,67% 22,000.00 35,639.60 13,639.60 62.00% tleating Permits 1,200.00 1,045.00 (155.00) -12.92'!,), 3.600.00 3,265.00 (335.00) -9.31% Plumbing Permits 300,00 805.00 505.00 168,33% 1,100.00 3,265.00 2,165.0(1 196.82% Sewer Permits 0.00 185.00 185.00 0.00% 0.00 365.00 365,00 0.00% Animal License 180.00 140.00 (40.00) -22.22% 1,140.00 1,120.00 (20,00) -1.75% Utility Permits 600.00 (1.00 (600.00) -10(1.00% 1,800.00 798,00 ((,002,00) -55.67/0 Burning Permit 100.00 180,00 80.00 80.00% 400.00 565.00 165,00 41.25% Homestead Credit Aid 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0,0(1 0,00 0.00°.ii MSA-Maintenance 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00`).4, 49,011.00 49,011,00 0,00 0.0096 State Fire Aid 1,500.00 3,000.00 1,500.00 1011.00°,4, 1,500.00 3,00(1.00 1,500.00 100.00% PERA Aid 0.00 0.00 ((.00 0.00'1'n (1.00 0.00 0,00 0,00°/0 Gravel Tax 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0(1% 688.63 0.00 (688.63) -100.00% Recycling Grant 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00% (1.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% Misc State Grant/Surcharge Rev 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Cable Franchise Revenue 0.00 (1.00 0,00 0,00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.0096 Zoning & Subdivision Fees 0.00 ((.00 (1.00 0.00% 1,000.00 0,00 (1,000.00) 0.00% Plan Check Fees 5,000,00 7,396.68 2,396,68 47.93Y9 13,000.00 21.243.19 8,243.19 63.4196 Sale of Copies, Books, Maps 0.00 11.75 11.75 0,00% 6.00 91.25 85.25 1420.83% Assessment Searches 120.00 75.00 (45.00) -37.50% 180.00 240.00 60.00 33.33% Clean Up Days 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Cable Operation Reimbursement 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00°.", 47.50 0.00 (47.5(1) 0.0096 Fines 5,000,00 5,062.92 62.92 1.26% 15,000,00 12,326.51 (2.673.49) -17.82% Miscellaneous Revenue 1,500.00 250,00 (1,25(3.00) -83.33% 4,500,00 1,994.21 (2,505.79) -55.68% Internal Charges 50.00 86.00 36,00 72.00% (50.00 584.00 434.00 289.3394) Interest Earnings (1.00 0.00 0.00 0 .01P/ti 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00'N, Donations 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0096 7,500.00 (1.00 (7,500.00) -100.00% Total Revenue 25,770.00 32,379.65 6,609.65 25.6596 124,408.13 136,572.76 12,164.63 9.78/0 EXPENSE 1110 - Mayor & Council PT Salaries 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 FICA Contributions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°A 0.00 0,00 0,00 11.(1011-, Medicare Contributions 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.0011/0 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.011% Workers Compensation 0,00 2(2.07 (222.07) 0.00% 36.00 222.07 (186.07) -516.86°A Nil i 'cage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00°. 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Miscellaneous 0.00 1,500.00 (1,500.00) 0.110(1/0 0.00 1,500.00 (1,500.00) 0.00% Dues & Subscriptions 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 3,391.00 10,339.00 (6,948,00) -204.90% Conferences & Training 500,00 389,00 11 I MO 22.20% 655.00 987,00 (332,00) -50.69°.io Total Mayor & Council 500.00 2,111.07 (1,611.07) -322.21/0 4,082.00 13,048.07 (8,966.07) -219,65°A 1320 - Administration FT Salaries 12,755,74 I 2.574.96 180.78 1,42% 39,921.30 39,907.60 13.70 0,03% PERA C'ontributions 924.79 1,009.40 (84.61) -9,15% 2,763,76 2,893.27 ((29.51) -4.69% ICM A Contributions 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% FICA Contributions 756.95 724,32 32,63 4.31% 2,394.58 2,302.10 92.48 3.86% Medicare Contributions I 77.04 109.41 7.63 4.31 % 560.06 538.42 21.64 3.86°A Health/Dental Insurance 3,127,60 2,6 11.00 516.60 16.52% 9,382.80 7,833,00 1,549,80 16.52°A Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0,00 888.00 (888.00) 0,00% 1.396.00 888.00 508,00 36,39% 011ice Supplies 592,58 634.52 (41.94) -7,08% 1,680.87 1,417,76 263,1 I I 5.65% Printed Forms 363.91 0,00 363,91 0,00% 363.91 0,00 363,91 0.00% Legal Services 4.000.00 7,570,57 (3,570,57) -89,26"A 12,000.00 12,512,07 (5)2,07) -4,27% News' ettertWebsite 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00°A 0,00 0,00 0.00 0,00% Assessing Services 2.000.00 2,000,00 0.0(1 0.00% 6,000,00 4,000.00 2,000.00 33,33% Contract Services 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.11011/0 Postage 300.00 0.00 300.00 100.00% 900.00 799,10 1(1(1,9(1 11.21% Mileage 150.00 40.9 I 109,09 72.73% 450,00 40,91 409.09 90.9 I % Legal Publishing 0,00 504.00 (504.00) 1).011°,4) 0.00 823.82 (823.82) 0,11011'1, Insurance 0.00 (199,7))) 199,70 0.00% 800.00 53.30 746,71) 93,34% Cable Operation Expense 0,00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Miscellaneous I 00.00 218.54 (118.54) - I I 8.54% 300.00 337.93 (37,93) -12.64% Dues & Subscriptions 100.00 0.00 10(1,00 I 00,00% 300.00 245.00 55.00 18.33°A Books 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.004 Conferences & Training 66.21 790,00 (723.79) -1093.17% 66.2 I 1,185.01) (1,1 )8,79) -1689.76% Staff Development 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00°4 Total Administration 25,414.82 29,535.93 (4,121.11) -16.22"/0 79,279.49 75,777.28 3,502.21 4.42% 1410- Elections PT Salaries Office Supplies Legal Publications/Notification Election Equipment Equipment Repair County Election Fees Printed Forms iscellaneious Total Elections 0.00 0.00 1).00 (1.00"'fi 0.0(1 0,00 0.0) 0.00" o 0.00 0.0(1 0,00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°0 (IMO 1).00 0,00 0.00". 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00°,-o 0.00 (1,00 0,00 0,00°,`,, 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0,00° ',, 150,00 0.00 15100 100,00% 0.00 0,01) 11.00 (1,00"4 940,00 0,00 940,00 I 00.00°1, 0.00 0,00 0.(10 0,0000 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 100.00 0,01) I 00.00 I 00.00"/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 1,190.00 0.00 1,190.00 100.110% 1450 - Communications FT Salaries 2,9 I 6.67 1,452,90 1,463,77 50,19°.'0 8,750.00 3,890.34 4,859.66 55.54% P ERA Contributions 2 I 1.46 105,35 1(16.1 I 50. I 8% 634,38 282.06 352.32 55.54% FICA Contributions I 80,83 87,2.5 93.58 51.75% 542.50 233,72 308.78 56.92% Medicare Contributions 42.29 20.40 21.89 51.76% 126,88 54.65 72,23 56.93% Health/Dental Insurance 0.00 272.00 (272,00) 0,00% 0.00 816.00 (816.0(1) 0.00% Worker:: Compensation 0,00 104.00 ( I 04.00) 0,00% 56.00 104,00 (48,00) -85.71°4, Newsletter 3,000.00 499.84 2,500.16 83.34% 3.000,00 2,728,18 271.82 9.06% Office Supplies 50.00 0,00 50.00 0.00% 50.00 47,86 2.14 0,00% IniciTechnology/Wcb 2,000.00 4,609.00 (2,609.00) -130.45% 6,000.00 I 0,1 93,20 (4,193,20) -69,89% Telephone 250.00 64.60 I 85.40 74. I 6% 750,00 129.20 620.80 82,77% Public Notices 200.00 1,315.80 (1.115.80) -557,90% 600,00 1.815.64 (1,2)5.64) -202.61% Cable Operations 275.00 229,54 45.46 16.53°/. 825.00 580.85 244. I 5 29.59% Repa iriM a int Equipment 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 56.50 (56.50) 0.005) Total Communications 9,126,25 8,760.68 365.57 4.0.1"/0 21,334.75 20,932.20 402.55 1.89% 1520 - Finance FT Salaries 4,576.40 6,866.00 (2,289.60) -50.03% 13,729.20 18,682.16 (4,952,96) -36.08% P ERA Contributions 331.79 497.79 ((66,00) -50.03% 995.37 1,354.46 (359,09) -36.08",/0 FICA Contributions 283,74 403.47 ((19,73) -42.20% 851.21 1,101.76 (250.55) _29.43% Medicare Contributions 66,36 94.34 (27.98) -42.17n/o 199.07 257.66 (58.59) -29,43°,/n Ilea' thiDental Insurance 718.02 1,088.00 (369.98) -51.53% 2,154.06 3,264,00 (1,1(19.94) -51.53% Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00"70 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0,00 494.00 (494.00) 0.00".4 0.00 494.00 (494.00) 0,00°A Office Supplies I 00.00 40.64 59.36 59.36% (((0.00 53.25 46,75 46,75% Printed Forms 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.001-1", I 50.00 0.00 150,00 I 00,00[N, Audit Services 0.00 5.875,00 (5,875,00) 0,00% 0.00 5,875.0(1 (5,875,00) (1,00°'. Contract Services 5,000.00 3,415,62 1,584.38 31.69% 5.000,00 8,983.64 (3,983.64) -79,67°,/u Software Programs 0,00 128,54 (128.54) 0.00% 0,00 128.54 ((28.54) 0.00% Mileage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00(N, 0.00 ((.00 0,00 0,00% Miscellaneous 0,00 0.00 (1.00 0,00% 1,500.00 ((.00 1,500.00 100.00°4, Dues & Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Conferences & Training 0,00 190.00 (190.00) 0,00% 400,00 225.00 I 75.00 43.75% Total Finance 11,076.30 19,093.40 (8,017.10) -72.38"/e 25,078.91 40,419.47 (15,340.56) -61.17°/0 1910 - Planning & Zoning FT Salaries 8,278.95 11,287,92 (3,008.97) -36.34% 24.836,85 29,254.32 (4,4(7.47) - I 7.79°;, P ERA Contributions 000,72 818,37 (218.15) -36.34IN 1,800.67 2,12(1.95 (320.28) -17.79% FICA Contributions 513.29 674.26 (16)1,97) -31.30°/0 1,539.88 I ,741.94 (202.(16) -13.12% Medicare Contributions 12(1,04 157.73 (37.69) -31,39°-t, 360.13 407.44 (47.31) -13.14°A, flealth/Dental Insurance 886.48 1,656.00 (769,52) -86.81% 2,659.45 4,968.00 (2,308.55) -86.81% Workers Compensation 0.00 916.(0 (916,00) 0.00% 500.00 916.00 (416.(10) -83.20% Office Supplies 50,0(1 634.61 (584,6)) -1169.22"4, 150,00 1,537.62 (1,387.62) -925.08% Printed Forms 0.00 217,85 (217.85) 0.00% 0.00 217.85 (217.85) 0.00% Engineering Services 1,500.00 5,574,43 (4,074.43) -271.63910 4,500.00 7,895,43 (3,395.43) -75.45% Contract Services 0.00 8,264.24 (8,264,24) 0.00% 0,00 10,650.74 (10.656.74) 0.00'N klileagc 30.00 0,00 30.00 100.0091, 90.0(1 0.00 90.00 100.00% Miscellaneous 20.00 314.05 (294.05) -1470.2594 00.00 332.25 (272.25) -453.75'N Dues & Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00°A, (1,00 0.00 0.00 Books 0.011 0.00 0.00 0.00'N 0.00 (1.00 0.00 0.0094 Conferences & Training 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00'N (1.00 0,00 0.00 (1,00% Total Planning & Zoning 11,999.00 30,515.46 (18,516.46) -154.32"/0 36,496.99 60,048.54 (23,551.55) -64.53 °A 1930 - Engineering Services Engineering Services 5,000.00 2,738.56 2,261,44 45.739', 15,000.00 6,274.80 8,725.20 58.17% Total Engineering Services 5,000.00 2,738.56 2,261 A4 45.23"/o 15,000.00 6,274.80 8,725.20 58.17% 1940 - City Hall Cleaning Supplies 50.00 0.00 50, 100.11094 150,00 0.00 150.0(1 100.0094 Building Repair Supplies 75.00 0,00 75.00 100.00% 225.00 0.00 225,00 100.0094 Telephone 700.00 180.12 519.88 74.27% 2,300.00 415.79 1,884,21 81.92% Utilities 900.00 1,301.54 (401.54) -44.62'N 2,700.00 2,746.03 (46.03) -1.7094 Refuse I 08.32 108.32 0.00 0.00'N 324.96 216.64 108.32 33.33'N Repairsiklaint Contractual Bldg 700.00 538.75 161.25 23.04% 2,100.00 1,720,51 379,49 18.07% RepairsiMaint Contractual Equip 400.00 803,29 (403.29) -100.82% 1,200.00 803,29 396,71 33.00% Miscellaneous 75.00 0.00 75,00 100,0094 225.00 47,92 177,08 78.7094 Total City Hall 3,008,32 2,932.02 76.30 2.54% 9,224.96 5,950.18 3,274.78 35.50°A Total General GM ernmcnt 66,124.69 95,687.12 (29,562.43) -44.7194 191,687.10 222,450.54 (30,763.44) -16.0594 DEPT 420 - PUBLIC SAFETY 2100 - Police Law Enforcement Contract Total Police 2150 - Prosecution Attorney Criminal Total Prosecution 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 034.72 (634.22) 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 634.22 (634.22) 0.00/0 4,250,00 4,260.50 (10.50) 12,750,00 8,510.50 4,239.50 33.7.5".4( 4,250.00 4,260.50 (10.50) -0.25% 12,750.00 8,510.50 4,239.50 33.25% 2220 - Fire FT Salaries 0,000.00 5,701.46 298.54 4,98% 18,000,00 10.575.86 1,424.14 7.91t1/0 PT Salaries 10,000.00 7,126.21 2,873.79 28.74% 30,000.00 33,253,81 (3.253.81) -10.8.5°,/0 P ERA Contributions I ,160.00 960,41 199.59 17.21°,(i 3,480,00 2,773,83 706.17 20,29°./0 FICA Contributions 992.00 397.62 594,38 50.97°A, 2,976.00 1,9(15,90 I ,070.04 35,96% Medicare Contributions 232.00 179.64 52,36 22.57% 690.00 704,43 (8.43) -1,21% Health/Dental Insurance 1,276.70 I ,142.00 134.7(1 10.55% 3.8311.09 3,426.00 404,09 10.55% Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°,,`G 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Workers Compensation 0,00 9,8(15.00 (9,805.00) 0.00% 10,130.00 9,805,00 325.00 3,71% Office Supplies 125.00 924.43 (799,43) -039,54% 125.00 1,080.35 (955,35) -764.28% EMS Supplies 150.00 0,00 150.00 I 00.00% 150.00 253.50 (103,50) -69.00% Fire Prevention 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,0011/0 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% Fuel, Oil & Fluids 1,122.00 759.64 367,36 32,30% 3,366.0(1 1,618.51 1,747.49 51,92".1, Small Tools & Equip 0,0(1 (9,003,52) 9,003,52 0,00% 8,200.00 592,29 7,007.71 92,78% Physicals 2,542.60 0,00 2.547.00 100.00% 2,842.60 100,00 2,742,60 96.48% Telephone 25(1.00 269.71 119,71) -7,88% 750.00 539.42 210,58 28,08`t() Radio 3,846.08 0,00 3,846,08 100.00% 3,946.08 239A0 3,706.68 93.935 Mileage 0.00 99.44 (99.44) 0.00(tio 0.00 99.44 (99.44) 0.00°A, Vehicle Insurance 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00% Electric Utility 900.00 1,835,79 (935.79) -103.98% 2,700.00 3,714,81 (1,014.81) -37.59% Refuse 47.68 47.68 0.00 0.00% 143,04 95.36 47,68 33.33% Repair/Maint Bldg 376.30 7,761.27 (7,384.97) -1962.52% 1,128,90 8,735.91 (7,607.))1) -673.84% Repair/Main t Equip 1,800.00 1,358.79 441.21 24.51% 9,756.00 3_509,30 6,240.70 64.03% Uniforms 150.00 0,00 150.0(1 I 00,00% 450.0)) 242.88 207,12 46,034 Miscellaneous 75.00 0,00 75,00 100.00'1/0 225.00 198.71 26.29 11,684E Dues & Subscriptions 400.00 0.00 400.0(1 IOU, 00'N) 2,000.00 2.2 10.00 (210,00) -10.50'4, Books 0,00 (1.00 0,00 0.00'N, 0.00 0.00 0,00 0M01?-4, Conferences & Training 500.00 644.66 (144,66) -28.93% 11.200.00 1,270,85 9,929.15 , 88,65",--i, Total Fire 31,945.36 30,010.23 1,935.13 6.06% 116,094.71 92,945.62 23,149.09 19.94% 2250 - Fire Relief Fire State Aid Total Fire Relief 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0 0011i, 0.00"/0 2400 - Building Inspection FT Salaries 5,747,36 0,689.06 (94 1,70) -16.3P-it 17,242.08 19,508,26 (2,326,18) -13A9'1,-), PERA Contributions 329.75 484,98 (155.73) -47,301V0 9(17,07 1,418,73 (511.66) -56,411).-;) FICA Contributions 273.24 389.42 (116,18) -47.57(14 752.85 1.139.56 (380.71) -51.37% Medicare Contributions 63,91 9 I .08 (27.17) -42.51 176.08 266.52 (90.44) -51.36?,(t Health/l)ental Insurance 767,49 1,414,00 (646,5)) -84.24% 2.302,47 4,242.00 (1.939.53) -84.24% Unemployment Benefiis 0.00 0.00 ((.00 0,00% 0.00 0,00 (1,00 0,00% Workers Compensation 0.00 485.00 (485.00) 0,00% I ,000.00 485.00 515,00 51,50°-fl ()nice Supplies 0.00 31.64 (3(.64) (1.011°A, 0.00 193.78 (193.78) 0.00% Printed Forms 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% Fuel, Oil & Fluids 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 54.08 (54,68) 0.00"A, Engineering 500,00 884,50 (384.50) -76.9094, 1,500,00 1,514.50 (14.50) -0.97111 Surcharge Pints 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0011/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0(1% Inspector Contract Services ((,00 150,50 (15)1.50) 0,00°A, 0.0(1 236.50 (236,50) Telephone 18,00 50.07 (32,07) -178.17% 54.00 100.14 (46.14) -85.4494 Mileage 0.00 35.85 (35,85) 0,00% 0.00 35.85 (35.85) 0.0094 Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,0094 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,01194 Repairs/Maint Equip 250.00 0,00 250.00 100.0094 250.00 0.00 250.00 100,00% Uniforms 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0.00 86.38 (86.38) (1,00% Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 ((.00 0.0011/0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.001 Dues & Subscriptions 90.00 0.00 90.00 100.00% 90.00 0.01) 90.00 100.0094 Books 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.0094 Conferences & Training 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00% 0.00 280.00 (280.00) 0.00"1,_ Total Building Inspections 8,039.25 10,706.10 (2,666.85) -33.17"/0 24,274.55 29,621.90 (5,347.35) -22.03"/o 2500 - Emergency Communications Contract Services Total Emergency Communications 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2700 - Animal Control Printed Forms 0,00 0,00 Contract Services 550.00 500.00 Miscellaneous 0.00 0.00 Total Animal Control 550.00 500.00 Total Public Safety 44,784.61 45,476.83 0,00 0.00 0.00 50.00 0.00 50.00 (692.22) 0.0094 0.00°/0 0 (10'1'0 9,09'1), 0.00"/e 9.09% -1.55`1/9 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.0094 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00"/o 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00% 1,650.00 I .000.00 650.00 39.3994 0.00 30.00 (30,00) 0.00% 1,650.00 1,030.00 620.00 37.58% 154,769.26 132,742.24 22,027.02 14.23"/0 DEPT 430 PUBLIC WORKS 3100 - Public Works FT Salaries 10,700.00 17,738,40 (2,038.4))) -19.05% 32,100.00 37,858.43 (5,758.43) -17,94°-,, PT Salaries 0,00 194.49 (194.49) 0.00% 0.00 861.20 (801.20) 0,00% PERA Contributions 775.75 933.28 (157.53) -20.31% 2,327.25 2,802.82 (475.57) -20,43% FICA Contributions 603.40 752.94 (89,54) -13.50% 1,990,2(1 2267,07 (271.87) -13.60% Medicare Contributions 155.15 176.07 (20,92) -13,48% 465.45 529,06 03,01) -13.67% Health/Dental Insurance 2,893.14 0.00 2,893.14 100,00°4, 8.679.43 5.798.00 2,881.43 33.20% Unemployment Benefits 2.50000 0.00 2,500.00 100.00% 2.500.00 0.00 2,500.00 100,00% Workers Compensation (1.00 9,022.00 (9,022,00) 0.00% 3,000.00 9,077.00 (6,022.00) -200.73% Office Supplies 50.00 (1.00 50.00 I 00,00% 150.01) 84.95 65,05 43.37% Shop Materials 150,00 112.37 37.63 25.09% 450.00 364,59 85.41 18.98% Building Repair Supplies 0,00 0.00 0.00 0,00°,i, 0.00 0,00 0,00 0.00% Small Tools and Minor Equip 250,00 182.07 67.93 27.17% 750.00 691.95 58.05 7.74°<, Engineering Services 150.00 945.00 (795.00) -530.00% 450.00 1,282.50 (832.51)) -185,00°,/,, Contract Services 400.00 0,00 400.00 100.0051, 1,200,00 0.00 1.2(11).0(1 100.00% eleplione 700,00 326.14 373,86 53.41% 7,100.00 702.80 1,397.20 60.53°4, Radio 300.00 0,00 300.00 100.0011/0 900.00 0,00 900.00 100,00% Mileage 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0,00°,,, Insurance 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00°4, 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00°4, Electric Utility 2,000.00 2,699,03 (699.03) -34.95% 0,000.00 5,902.74 97.26 1.62% Refuse 207,82 207.82 0.00 0.0051, 623.46 415.64 207.82 33.33% Fuel. Oil, Fluids (ALL depts) 3,000,00 7,110.14 (4,11(1,14) - I 37.00°4, 9,00)1.00 8,038,19 361,81 4,02°A lepairIM aim Bldg 250.00 1,124,25 (874.25) -349.70°,4, 750.00 2,118.10 (1,368.10) -182.41% ItepairMaint NOT Bldg 45.00 0.00 45.00 I 00.00% 135,00 115,00 20.00 14.81% Repair/Maint Equip (out) 500.00 6.65 493.35 98.67% 1,500.00 140.73 1,35927 90.62% Equipment Parts 500.00 0,00 500,00 100,00% 1,50(1.00 0.00 1,500.00 I 00,00% linifomis 175.00 244.67 (69.67) -39.81°4, 525.00 368,57 156.43 29.80% Miscellaneous 75.00 0,00 75.00 100.00% 775.00 0.00 225.00 100,00% Landscaping Material 85.00 0,0(1 85,00 100.00% 255.00 0,00 255.00 100.000/0 Dues & Subscriptions 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00/n 60.00 56.00 4.00 6 . 6 7 'in Conferences & Training 0.00 160.00 (100.00) 0.005,, 619.00 160,00 459.60 74.18% Clean up Days 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% Total Public Works 26,525.26 36,935.32 (10,410.06) -39.25"/0 78,255.39 80,175.34 (1,919.95) 3120 - Streets Equipment Pails Street Maintenance Materials Sign Repair Materials Contract Services Repairs/Maint Equipment Total Streets 0,00 117,61 (117.61) 0,00% 0.00 317,87 (317.87) 0,00°4, 1.000.00 137.55 862,45 86,25% 3,000,00 137.55 2,862.45 95.42% 250.00 0,00 250.00 100,00% 750,00 0,0(1 750.00 100.00% 850.00 0.00 850,00 100,0(M 7,550,00 0.00 2,550.00 100.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.00% 2,100.00 255.16 1,844.84 87.85% 6,300.00 455.42 5,844.58 92,77°A) 3125 - Ice & Snow Removal 1.andseaping Material 0.00 0,00 0.00 (OWN, 0,00 0.00 0,00 0.0011'0 Sand:Solt 0,00 28,107.67 (28,)07.67) 0.00% 25,000.00 46,01443 (21.0)4,43) -84,06% Contract Services 1,250,00 3.144.00 (1,894.0(1) -151,52% 6.250,00 3,144.00 3,106,0(1 49.70% Repai rs/Maint Equipment 250,00 4,1 18.32 (3,868.32) -1.547.331! i, 750.00 4,734,91 (3,984,91) -531,32% Total Ice & Snow Removal 1,500.00 35,369.99 (33,869.99) -2258.00% 32,000.00 53,893.34 (21,893.34) -68.42% 3160 - Street Lighting Street "total Street Lighting 2,100.00 7,333.21 (233.21) -11,11% 2,100.00 2,333.21 (233.21) -11.11"/0 6,300,00 4,674.111,625 89 25.81(l.1, 6,300.00 4,674.11 1,625.89 25.81% 3200 - Recycling Recycling Supplies 30000 (U)) 300.00 I 00,00", n 300,00 0.00 300.00 100.00% Newsletter 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00'1'ii 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00% M iscel laneous 400.00 0.00 400,00 100,001'.'0 1,200,00 0,00 1.200.00 I 00.009(, Total Recycling 700.00 0.00 700.00 100,00% 1,500.00 0.00 1,500.00 100.00% 3250 - Tree Program Contract Services Total Tree Program Total Public Works 400,00 0.00 400.00 100,00% 400.00 0.00 400,00 100.00"/o 33,325.26 74,893.68 — (41,568.42) -124.74"/o 1,200.00 0.00 1,200,00 100.00% 1,200,00 0.00 1,200,00 100.00"/0 125,555.39 139,198.21 — (13,642.82) -10.87% DEPT 450 - CUL1URE, RECREATION 5200 - Parks & Recreation FT Salaries 8,583,96 6,916.38 1,667.58 19,43% 25,751.88 21,933.74 3,818.64 14.83% PT Salaries 1.500,00 1.102,09 397.91 26.53"iii 7,500.00 4,880.09 2,619.91 34.93% P ERA Contributions 677.34 580.26 42,08 6.76°'(, 1,867.01 1,996,39 ((29.38) -6,9391) RCA Contributions 625.21 469.19 156.07 74.9511.1, 2,061.62 1,642.36 419.76 20,34°4 Medicare Contributions 146.22 109.77 36.50 24,96% 482,15 384.07 98,08 20.34°-,i 1 lealth/Dental Insurance 1,084,57 290.16 794,41 73.254 3.253,72 2,115.68 1,138.04 34,9814 Unemployment Benefits 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00°A, 0,00 0.00 0,0(1 0.00% Workers Compensation 0.0(1 5,006.00 (5,006.00) 0,00% 3,000,00 5,006,00 (2,0(16.00) -66.87% Shop Materials 0.00 0.00 0,0(1 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00% Chemicals 50.00 0.00 50,00 100.00°/(i 150.00 0.00 150.00 100,00% Equipment Parts 150.00 0,00 150.00 I 00.00"A 450,00 23.50 426.50 94.78% Building Repair Supplies 0.00 0,00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% Landscaping Materials 200.00 0.00 200.00 100,00% 600.00 0.00 600.00 100,00% Small Tools and NI Mot- Equip 75.00 1,569.14 (1,494.14) -1992,19% 775.00 1,569,14 (1,344.14) -597.4054 Telephone 100.00 75.26 24.74 24.7454 300.00 150.63 149,37 49,7954 Mileage 0.0(1 0.00 0,00 0,00% 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% Insurance 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0054 Electric Utility 750.00 934.36 ((84.36) -24.58% 2,250.00 2.166.68 83.32 3 , 70"/0 Refuse 207.8.2 2)17.82 0,00 0.0054 623.46 415.64 207.82 33,33°/0 Repair/Maint Bldg 25.00 0.00 25.00 100.00% 75.00 0.00 75,00 100.00"/0 Repair/Maint NOT Bldg 50,00 0.00 50.00 100,00% 150.00 0.00 150.00 100.00% Repair/Maint Equip 100.00 0,00 100.00 100,00°A 300.00 0,00 300.00 100.00% Rental Buildings 400,00 0,00 400.00 100.00% 1,200.00 0,00 1,200.00 100,0054 Miscellaneous 0,00 85,OU (85.00) 0.00% 0.00 85.00 (85.00) 0,00% Total Parks & Recreation 14,670.11 17,345.38 (2,675.27) -18.24"/0 50,239.84 42,368.42 7,871.42 15.67"/0 DEPT 460 - CONIP ADJ 0.00 0 0 0,00% 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00°:4 DEPT 490 - CONTINGENCY FUND 0.00 0 0 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0,00 0,00% DEPT 493 - OTII FINANCING 0,00 0 0 0.00% 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00% GRAND TOTAL ALL DEPTS 158,904.67 233,403.01 (74,498.34) -46.88"/0 522,251.59 536,759.41 (14,507.82) -2.7854 Net Income over Expenses (133,134.67) (201,023.36) (67,888.69) 50.9954 (397,843.46) (400,186.65) (2,343.19) 0.59"/I) TI 117. (Try ()E: E F MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 5 MOTION Consent Agenda AGENDA ITEM: March Permit Report SUBMITTED BY: Rick Chase, Building Official THROUGH: Rick Chase, Building Official REVIEWED BY: Cathy Bendel, Finance Director SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED:, As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to accept the monthly permit report. No specific motion is needed, as this is recommended to be part of the overall approval of the Consent Agenda. STAFF REPORT: Below are the year to date key statistics for March 2013: 2013 1012 2011 Total Building permits: 37 37 45 Total Building valuation: $4,047,943 S2,213,268 $1,815.783 New homes 8 3 3 Total valuation $3,307,289 $1,685,412 $1,000,000 Avg home value $413,411 $561,804 $333,333 -17 IN E mazmatrrngfr.,;„''' MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 6 AGENDA ITEM: Production Well No. 4 — Approve Plans and Specifications and Order Advertisement for Bids SUBMITTED BY: Jack Griffin, City Engineer THROUGH: Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director Mike Bouthilet, Public Works SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (i0-emoved from the Conent At,enda): Questions from Council to Staff.. ............ ....... Public Input, if Appropriate ...... ..... ...... ......... . ......... Callfor Motion ......... ........ .......... .............................. ........ Discussion........ ....... . ........... ...... . ......... . ........... ..... Action on Motion.................. ..... ..... ...... ..... .... SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: ........Mayor Facilitates ... __Mayor Facilitates Mayor & City Council Mayor & City Council .. __Mayor Facilitates The City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Production Well No. 4. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-26, Approving the plans and specificationsd ordering the advertisement fin. bids .for Production Well No. 4." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Plans and Specifications have been completed for Production Well No. 4. The Engineer's opinion of probable construction cost is S421,000. The improvements include: Construction of a municipal water supply production well capable of producing 1,250 gallons of sand free water per minute, to be located on newly acquired property near 50th Street and Lake Elmo Avenue. • A Jordan Formation well to be constructed to an approximate depth of 300 feet with a 24-inch diameter casing and open boring hole and an 18-inch welded steel casing pipe. Development and test pumping with the goal to obtain a 1,250 gallon per minute (pm) capacity well. Testing and chemical analytics of the water quality to determine that the water supply meets all primary safe drinking water standards, including safe standards for perflourochemicals (PFCs). The purchase and installation of a 1,250 gpm well pump. The contract requires the well driller to return to the project site upon completion of the Pumphouse construction to install the pump and participate in project start-up. Erosion control, cleanup and site restoration. Construction of Water Supply Well No. 4 is needed to supplement the supply capacity of the city's municipal water system in order to satisfy peak summer demands and support further expansion of the water system customer base from new growth and development. The need for Well No. 4 is documented in the City's 2030 Comprehensive Water System Plan and has been programmed in the 2013 Capital Improvement Program. Test Well No. 4 was completed in February of 2012 to confirm adequate production capacity and water quality for the proposed well site near 50th Street N and Lake Elmo Avenue. Upon the successful completion of Test well No. 4, a 1.38 Acre Site was purchased at 11250 50th Street North to locate the new Well and Pumphouse. The site includes a shared driveway with the property located directly north and contains adequate space to provide setback distances in accordance with the well criteria established by the Minnesota Department of Health. In the near future, the city engineer will recommend that the council authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for the construction of Pump House No. 4 to be constructed under a separate contract. A third contract will be commissioned for a new 12-inch diameter trunk connecting watermain from the well location to connect with the existing watermain near the intersection of Lake Elmo Avenue and 43rd Street N. FUNDING: Project costs for the design and construction of Production Well No. 4, Pump House No. 4 and the Lake Elmo Avenue Connecting Trunk Watennain are all incorporated into the city's S1.0 million DEED Water System Grant Agreement. It is a requirement of the DEED Grant that the city provide a match of S1.0 Million, anticipated to be funded through bond proceeds. Combined with the Keats Trunk Watermain Extension, the city will be constructing almost $2.6 million in water infrastructure projects. The state's obligation to fund the DEED Grant shall terminate if the entire Grant has not been disbursed by December 31, 2014. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending the city council approve, as part of the Consent Agenda, Resolution No. 2013-26, thereby approving the plans and specifications and ordering the advertisement for bids for Production Well No. 4. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-26, Approving the plans and specifications and ordering the adverrisementfor bids for Production Well No. 4." ATTACHMENT(SJ: 1. Resolution No. 2013-26 2. Project Schedule 3. Production Well No. 4 Plans and Specifications (available for revievi. at City Hall) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-26 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND ORDERING ADVERTISEMENT FOR BIDS FOR PRODUCTION WELL NO. 4 WHEREAS, pursuant a resolution passed by the city council on the 5th day of February, 2013, the city engineer, together with Advanced Engineering and Environmental Services, Inc. has prepared plans and specifications for Production Well No. 4 and has presented such plans and specifications to the council for approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED Such plans and specifications, a copy of which is on file at Lake Elmo City Hall and made a part hereof, are hereby approved. 2. The City Clerk shall prepare and cause to be inserted in the official paper and in Finance & Commerce an advertisement for bids upon the making of such improvements under such approved plans and specifications. The advertisement shall be published for at least 21 days, shall specify the work to be done, and shall state that sealed bids provided to the City Clerk prior to the specified hid date and time and accompanied by a bid bond or cashier's check made payable to the City of Lake Elmo in an amount not less than 5% of the amount of such hid will be considered. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor Resolution No. 2013-26 [����A��T������[�U|� ^ ,v����—�~ / SCHEDULE PRODU|�—T|��0J WELL NJ�� ,� CTION / /��v� w� �—�—�- .n��. —r . PROJECT NO. 2013.125 ENGINEERING, inc. Cara Geheren,pE. Jack Griffin, P.E. RyanStempxki F.E. Chad |s*kson'P.E. Revised April 2013 February 5,ZD13 Council authorizes the Preparation ofplans and specifications. February lI,IOl3 Project kickoff meeting. 651.300.4261 651.300.4I64 051.300.4267 651.300.4283 April 16,ZOI3 Approve Plans and Specifications and Authorize Advertisement for Contractor Bids. (estimated 8 weeks) May l6,ZOI] Accept Contractor Bids May %l,2O13 Contract Award. May Z4,Z0I3 Process and send out Contract Documents. June 7, 2013 Receipt nfContractor's Bonds / Legal Review. June 11,2U13 Conduct Pre -construction Meeting and Issue Notice toProceed. 0ctober,ZOl3 Production Well Contractor Work is substantially complete (estimated 19 weeks). Novernber,IOl3 Final Completion Date. Record As'bui|ts;Testing Results; and Close-out Documents. TI (:11" • K• E. FLMO AGENDA ITEM: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 CONSENT ITEM #: 7 MOTION As part of Consent Agenda Adopting Amended Resolution Authorizing Limited Property Tax Abatement for 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017 SUBMITTED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent .42-endat Introduction of Item and Report/Presentation....................... City Administrator Questions from Council to Staff .................... ..... ....... ......... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ......... ..... ..................... ...... ......... .......... Mayor & City Council Discussion ....... ...... ................................................ ....... Mayor & City Council - Action on Motion ............ ...... ............... ...... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTIONREOVESTED; As part of its Consent Agenda, the City Council is asked to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, authorizing a property tax abatement for a commercial property located in the 1-94 Corridor Planning Area (8665 Hudson Boulevard). If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, Authorizing Limited Property Tax Abaremenrfor 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017" BACKGROUND INFORMATI0N: On February 19, 2013, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2013-11, which authorized limited property tax abatement for 8665 Hudson Boulevard for years 2014, 2015, 2016 and 2017. Resolution No. 2013-27 simply changes the name of the purchasing company from "Valley Cartage" to "Norman James, LLC." Norman James, LLC is the name of the real estate holding company that is purchasing the building, while Valley Cartage, Inc. is the company who will he leasing the building. Todd Gilbert is a 50% owner of Norman James, LLC and is the sole owner of Valley Cartage, Inc. STAFF REPORT: The City of Lake Elmo has worked with Washington County to determine a total abatement figure of S40,000 over a period of 4 years to offset the artificiality of the assessment policy and free up liquidity for the creation of jobs. Washington County approved its Tax Abatement Resolution and Agreement for its part of the project on Tuesday April 9, 2013 at its County Board Meeting, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council approve as part of the Consent Agenda Resolution No. 2013-27. If removed from the consent agenda the recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-27, Authorizing Limited Property Tax .4batement 8665 Hudson Boulevard fin. years 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017" ATTACHMENTS: . Resolution No. 2013-77 SUGGESTED 0 ER OF BUSINESS (if removed from the Consent Agenda): Introduction of Item and Report/Presentation........ ..... ....... City Administrator Questions from Council to Staff .......... ............. ...... . ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ........ ..... . ....... ............................... Mayor & City Council Discussion ........... . ...... . ........ .......... ........ ..... ........ Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ............... ..... .............. ..... .............. Mayor Facilitates 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-27 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING LIMITED PROPERTY TAX ABATEMENT FOR 8665 HUDSON BOULEVARD FOR YEARS 2014, 2015, 2016, 2017 WHEREAS, the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, under Minnesota State Statutes Chapter 272, 273 and Chapter 489, has the authority to value and assess all real property within its jurisdictional boundaries and, WHEREAS, Minnesota law authorizes political subdivisions to grant property tax abatements for economic development to encourage businesses to locate or expand to an area (Minn. Stat. §§ 469.1819-459.1816) and, WHEREAS, abatements are available for up to 15-20 years and the total abatement cannot exceed the larger of ten percent (10%) of the net tax capacity or $200,000.00 and, WHEREAS, Norman James LLC of Woodbury, MN wishes to purchase and relocate to 8665 Hudson Boulevard in the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota creating approximately fifty (50) or more jobs providing significant compensation in the area of logistics transportation that will stimulate the local economy and, WHEREAS, the fifty (50) or more jobs include positions in the transportation logistics industry that pay between $35,000490,000 per year created by 2015 and that are subject to Minnesota state income tax and, WHEREAS, the current assessed market value of 8665 Hudson Boulevard has been placed at $2,125,500 for the last two years and the building is currently built out at approximately the 80°,70 level and, WHEREAS, the purchase price will include non -real property assets and thus will not solely reflect the value of the improvements and land and, WHEREAS, Norman James LLC has requested a limited property tax abatement for the years 2014-2017 as well as consideration of limited property tax abatement for 2018, and WHEREAS, the City Council finds that the public benefits involved would include, but will not he limited to, general economic development, ultimately increasing the tax base, increasing the number of jobs in the area, and spurring economic activity along the 1-94 corridor and these benefits would exceed the cost of abating the City portion of property taxes for the years 2014- 2017 arising from any increase in the property value above the current assessed valuation ($2.125,200.00). Resolution No. 2013-27 NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED, That the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, Minnesota, agrees to abate the increase in the city portion of property taxes paid, excluding fiscal disparities, on parcel 33.029.21.44.0037 as follows: 1. For the purpose of this agreement, "increase in the city portion of property taxes paid, excluding fiscal disparities" specifically excludes any portion of the tax attributable to the area -wide tax under M.S. § 473F from abatement. The amount of tax abatement is calculated as follows for each parcel with an increase in taxable market value for a given year: a. Calculate the base year city tax for the parcel i. Multiply current year class rates by the taxable market value for taxes payable in 2012 (S2,125,200) to deterrnine the total tax capacity. ii. Multiply the total tax capacity by the fiscal disparity percentage for the current year to determine the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity. iii. Subtract the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity from the total tax capacity to determine the local tax capacity. iv. Multiply the local tax capacity by the city tax rate for the current year to determine the base year city tax. b. Calculate the current year city tax for the parcel i. Multiply current year class rates by the taxable market value for the current year to determine the total tax capacity. ii. Multiply the total tax capacity by the fiscal disparity percentage for the current year to determine the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity. iii. Subtract the fiscal disparity portion of the tax capacity from the total tax capacity to deterrnine the local tax capacity. iv. Multiply the local tax capacity by the city tax rate for the current year to determine the current year city tax. c. Subtract the base year city tax from the current year city tax to determine the change in city tax. d. The change in city tax greater than SO is the amount of tax abatement for the year. 3 Notwithstanding any provision to the contrary, no city abatement will be granted if the total taxes due on the parcel is less than the total tax amount due for taxes payable in 2012 of 570,256. 4. The maximum duration of the abatement shall be for four years, beginning for taxes payable in 2014, except that the City Council will consider an abatement for the year 2018 if requested by the property owner. 5. The maximum annual tax abatement amount shall not exceed 510,000.00 in any year and maximum total abatement for all years for all abating parties shall not exceed S40,000.00. Resolution No. 2013-27 6. The City of Lake Elmo will make payment of the abatement to the property owner on or before July 30 of each year. No payment will be made after July 30, 2017 or after the total abatement for the four abatement years has been paid. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-27 TI II: CITY ()I: A K E F. L MO MAYOR AND COUNC DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: COMMUNICATION 04/16/2013 AGENDA ITEM: Special Event Permit: Wild Adventure Race Spring. Sprint - Sunfish Lake Park/Lake Elmo Park Reserve SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: Kyle Klatt, Director of Planning Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Nick Johnson, City Planner SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item .................. ...... ....... ......................... ..... ................. Staff Report/Presentation ..... ...... ............. .......... ................. ..... ............ ...... .............. Staff Questions from Council to Staff ........... ..... .............. ..... ............. Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate .......... .......... ................................ Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ..... ........................... ....... . ...... .......... ...... Mayor & City Council Discussion... ...... .................. ...... ........ ....... ................ ......... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ............ ....... ..... ................ ..... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to approve a request from Liz DeJonge of Wild Adventure Race to conduct an orienteering/trail run within Sunfish Lake Park as part of a larger race event to be conducted within the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. The event would be conducted on Saturday. June 1 and would involve a biking, boating, and running component, with only the former element being conducted within the City park property. This event was conducted last year during the first weekend in June and Staff is not aware of any issues that arose due to the special event. PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT Special events are allowed under City Code via a perrnit issued by the City Council. FISCAL IMPACT: None — all costs associated with the event will be borne by the applicant. There are no anticipated public expenses associated with the event. BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Since the planned event is almost identical to the one conducted last year, the applicant has asked that the materials attached to the previous application be included with the current request. Staff has also included the relevant review comments from last year as part of this report. The applicant has completed a special event permit application form and provided a project narrative that provides additional details about the event (submitted with last year's application). The event being proposed would he a rely -type race that requires participants to navigate a course with maps and a compass. The portions of the race that will take place in the Lake Elmo Park Reserve will involve the use of boats and bicycles, while the portion in Sunfish Lake Park will involve runners on foot. Since the event is an orienteering race, there will be flags placed along the relay route at various checkpoints. An example of the flags to be used is included in the application narrative. Other than the runners using the park and the flags to be placed along the route, the only other impact to Sunfish Lake Park will be the parking of bicycles in the parking lot and the gathering of event volunteers in this location to assist the participants. The event is not expected to draw spectators and will not involve the use of sound systems or other activities that could be a potential nuisance to surrounding neighbors or park users. A special event permit has been deemed necessary for this event because it will involve more than 100 participants within a 24-hour period and is a privately -sponsored event. The ordinance for Special Events also lists a series of information that must be provided or requirements that must be met in order to conduct the event, which includes the following: Maximum Number of People: 200 competitors and 10 volunteers • Sound Equipment: None • Sanitary Facilities: None (event starts and ends in the Park Reserve) • Security: The applicant is working with Washington County Parks to secure proper pen -nits for access to the park. Volunteers will be used to monitor the bike drop area and to help monitor the crossing at Highway 5. • Food Service: None provided at Sunfish Lake Park • Fire Protection: None required, please see previous comments from the Fire Chief below. • Duration of Special Event: June 1, 2012 between 8:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. (with two additional hours for setup and teardown). Racers will be in Sunfish Lake Park between 10:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. • Cleanup Plan: Removal of flags and clearing of parking lot. • Waivers: None requested. • Insurance: To be secured within two weeks of event; example certificate submitted prior to last year's event included with application. In addition to the above requirements, the applicant has indicated that they will have EMT's on the site during the event. As part of the previous permit review one year ago the Fire Chief requested that access be maintained into the park for emergency vehicles and also, in the event that his department is called in, a point of contact that assist with any emergency. Staff will again be providing the proper contact information to the Fire Chief, and is suggesting that one of the conditions of approval include a provision that access into the park not be blocked off during any part of the event. The applicant has indicated that they obtain insurance closer to the race event, and therefore, has submitted only the form use last year as an example of the document that will be used. Staff is recommending that an additional condition of approval require the submission of proper insurance documentation at least two weeks prior to the event date. 2 RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information and staff report, it is recommended that the City Council approve a Special Event Permit for Wild Adventure Race to conduct an orienteering/trail run within Sunfish Lake Park as part of a larger race event to be conducted within the Lake Elmo Park Reserve on June 1, 2012 with the following conditions of approval: . Access into Sunfish Lake Park shall not be blocked at any time during the course of the event. 2. A valid certificate of insurance meeting the requirements of Section 110.070 (E, 1, j) of the City Code shall be submitted at least two weeks prior to the event." ATTACHMENT(: 1. Special Event Permit Application Form 2. Application Narrative (Submitted for previous event) 3. Example Certificate of Insurance K E ELMO Special Event Permit Application I. Title and Brief Description of Event 1:1; 17,2 7;- 11. Applicant Information The applicant is responsible for answering all questions, including inquiries from media and citizens. Applicant: L.J.c.„ Address: Business/Organization: ;„1! k-) Title: Daytime Phone: Mobile Phone: Emergency Phone: III. Event Timetable A. Requested day and date: B. Requested Hours of Operation, from C. Set up beginning day and date_ D. Dismantle by day and date E Anticipated number ot participants: 11 L,UI a I fl..0 to ..- - time . ,,:-1,,n-ii.lp.ii L.., , time r„, a.m. and spectators: an event is covered. The policy must also show evidence that the requested event is not excluded ir urn insurame dLlill , V. Check All Items that Apply to your Event ' � Use of Public Facility (note fad|hv): �..L� Event participant and/or spectator parking areas (deschbe): l'� Entertainment or stage location (provide to -scale drawings); Construction or erection of temporary structures (may need permit: check with planning Trash containers (indicate # and /ocadons)- Pnrtab/etoiletfad|ides(indicate#andkzcatkzns), � First aid facilities (indicate who isprovd)no): ~^ �- �'- �� ^�c_ �7�`^ Parade and/or parade floats (may need penmh); Fireworks and/or pyrotechnics site (may need permit, check with the fire department); Cooking facilities, open flame, or vehicle fuels (may need permit, check with fire department)-, L� Electricity (indicate source and plan): [ ( Other (please describe\: 0. Food, Beverages, and/or Entertainment A. If your event includes music, live entertainment, sound amplification or any other noise impact, please describe, including the intended hours of the music, sound or noise. .� B. Will alcoholic beverages heserved? Yes { No C. Name ofliquor establishment: D. �ofservi��eo�alcohol vc�sidca|ice^seUprcmi�e,indu�ead|a�rarn�huwin�thed��ned area of the alcohol concession service and attach a copy of your certificate of liquor iiahiiityinsurance rovehnEr the |i'nhsnft�n�}coho1sprvic,�area, B. If the event is to occur at night, describe how you will light the event area in order to increase the safety of participants and spectators coming to and leaving the event: IX. Clean-up List persons responsible for clean-up duties: • X. Mitigation of Impacts on Others Describe how you intend to mitigate the impacts of the special event on businesses, churches, neighbors, motorists, and others: 1 t - Note: Any condition which causes adverse impacts may be cause to revoke the Special Events Permit Applicant Signature:.: Date of Application: 4 ��Ol�est fSpecial �eCEvent'EvenEventPermit- -^ r What: Wild Adventure Race Sprint SoriesRace I When: Where: Sun Fish Lake Park and Lake G|rno Park Reserve 7[bne: h:OO acotu 4:00 pm (race cnnuperitorswill be in the park from approximately IO-ODarn Lo2:O0 pm) Description: An adventure race iSateam sport that requires navigating course with maps and a compass utilizing cunnbioudoos of non -motorized disciplines - on foot, bike, and in boats (canoe, kayak, or raft). It is very similar to orienteering, which has been done atSun Fish Lake Park in the past. in this particular event, which is designed for beginners, racers in teams of 2 will begin on bikes in Lake E|nnu Park Reserve (LbPR), They will be looking for checkpoints along the way. Checkpoints are ueocraUy orange and white, lightweight orienteering fiags (see image), Racers will also be doing a boat section in LEPR. These two sections couN take teams up to Z firs to cornp\otc' thus spreading our teams quite a bit. After the bike and boat sections teams will leave LEPD by the North EoLrance'croox Hwy 5.and enter Sun Fish Lake Park. Tearns will then drop their bikes with volunteers in a section o[the parkio�lot orjusLoff the lU�nearthe Lroi|bcad. TaarnswiUthen QoVn [oui to look for more checkpoints, approximately S-lO of them. Most teams should finish in under l hour. Once the section is complete, teams will retrieve their bikes arid head back. across Hwy 5 to the finish in LEPK. The whole course should take the avcragetcucn 3 hours. There may be one or two volunteer vehicles, but other than that, the only space we will be occupying is an area with the bikes. This is very flexible. With the start and finish in LEPR, there will limited impact in Sun Fish [.abc Park. The Minnesota Orienteering Club held asimilar event inthe park several years ago. We have permission from LEPR and we are coordinating the crossing ofHwry 5 with the Washington County Sheriff's Office and MnDOT. MouPenn}e; 200 connpcii1oru plus up to lO volunteers. The competitors will be well spread ovL VVevvUl not disturb regular park visitors any more than an), other traU runner would. In hact, the cuolinenLvve usu:Uy roceivefrorn park managers and staff isthat visitors were not even aware anevent was happening iothe park. Sound Eqoionmeol: Nuou 5moitorvFacilbies: None required, the competitors will bcrunning nn the trails for approximately l hour and then will head to LEPR. Security: VVc will have volunteers at the bike drop. Competitors will retrieve bikes after they have done the trail run and return toLEP}L Food Service: No food will be provided at Sun Fish Lake Park Fire Protection: Not applicable Clean Un Plan: Clean up will rocrc|y mean removing 5-I0 orange and white orienteering On�s that have been placed along the trails, and making sure the parking lot is clear ofany possible wrappers from "energy bars" consumed by the participants. This will take nomore than one hour, Waiver: NA Insurance: We carry a $] million 'insurance per occurrence and provide additional insured certificates for land owners/managers. Provided is an example from a previous race of an additional insured certificate for the City o[Duluth. Safety: VVevvd|have EM7`sonsite. Miscellaneous: Parkin- will not be needed (except fur volunLeervebic]e or two), but bikes will bodropped inacorner o[the lot, Thank you for considering our request. Please direct any questions to Rick Odgers at 612.356.1353 or via email at rickoPvvildadveotorarmce,cwmn. A CORE) CERTRCATE OF LUX IL TY INSURANCE 5/22/2012 THIS CERTIFICATE IS ISSUED AS A MATTER OF INFORMATION ONLY AND CONFERS NO RIGHTS UPON THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. THIS CERTIFICATE DOES NOT AFFIRMATIVELY OR NEGATIVELY AMEND. EXTEND OR ALTER THE COVERAGE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES BELOW. THIS CERTIFICATE OF INSURANCE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A CONTRACT BETWEEN THE ISSUING INSURER(S), AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE OR PRODUCER, AND THE CERTIFICATE HOLDER. IMPORTANT: If the certificate holder is an ADDITIONAL INSURED, the policy(ies) must be endorsed. If SUBROGATION IS WAIVED. subject to the terms and conditions of the policy. certain policies may require an endorsement. A statement on this certificate does not confer rights to the certificate holder in Iieu of such endorsement(sj. PRODUCER McKay Insurance Agency, Inc. 106 East Main Street P 0 Box 151 Knoxville IA 50138 INSURED Silent Sports Association - AR Series Wild Adventure Race, LLC 8839 Tyler Street NE DATE iMr.VDD/YYYY1 glirr'T Meg Carruthers PHONEX iF„,, (641)842-2135 (6.111828-20:3 E-MAIL SS•mcarruthers@mckayinsagency .com ADDRE INSURER(51 AFFORDING COVERAGE NAIC INSURER A -LeXirlgt011 Insurance Company 19437 INSURER I INSURER C: INSURER D t INSURER E Blaine MN 55434 I INSURER F COVERAGES CERTIFICATE NUMBERCL1252227676 REVISION NUMBER: THIS IS TO CER—iFY THAT THE POLICIES OF INSURANCE LISTED BELOW HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO THE INSURED NAMED ABOVE FOR THE POLICY PERIOD INDICATED NOTWITHSTANDING ANY REC.IUIREMENT, TERM OR CONDITION OF ANY CONTRACT OR 01:ER DOCUMENT WITH RESPECT TO WHICH THIS CERTIFICATE MAY BE ISSUED OR MAY PERTAIN, THE INSURANCE AFFORDED BY THE POLICIES DESCRIBED HEREIN IS SUBJECT TO ALL THE TERMS'. EXCLUSIONS AND CONDITIONS OF SUCH POLICIES. LIMITS SHOWN MAY HAVE BEEN REDUCED BY PAID CLAIMS, -- . INSR ' IADDL WISH: i. POLICY EFF POLICY EXP , LTR , TYPE OF INSURANCE !INSR Wvn ! POLICY NUMBER 1 IMMIUDNYYYI IMWD0NYYY), LIMITS ;EACH OCCURRERCE :'. 1,000,000 COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABIL:7' '7,i,A.Z13_;t II -I:'_ R,F.r:,,TFr: , is c ,:-.. nc,,orrenre: $ 100,000 CLAIMLEr-mADE LX ! 0,7C,iF, X 9472463 i MED EX', 1,..ny one perSonl $ Excluded X Includes Athletic I t,-E!SDNAL a AD\' INJURY $ 1,000,000 Participants GENERAL AGGREGATE :, 2,000,000 I i PROOL,CTF - CONIr'fOr' AGI,, 2,000,000 A GENERAL LIABILITY AGGREGATE LIMIT APPLIES PER; ; POL X ! LOG ' AUTOMOBILE LIABILITY Ar.P;' AJTO. , t ALI, OWNED • ; SE1'HEDLILEIE.: ''• , a'...cr05 L.,_,..; AUTOS 1 , NON -OWNED HIRE:: AUTOS , ;' AUTOE r • .. UMBRELLA LIAR X OCCUr, A x EXCESS LIAB RETENflUNS WORKERS COMPENSATION AND EMPLOYERS LL581L1T7 Y/N1 ANY PROPRIETOR;PARTNERIEXE:$11TIVE OFF-lc:E.:VI:EMBER EXCLUDEL1', IMandalory in NH) n yet,. dascrme unde° DESCRIP110,. Cr, OPER4-r roNs • • N/A i9472463 6/2/2012 6/3/2012 6/2/2012 6/3/2012 ;;;;;;• SC.`,1,1BINED SINGLE L11,1;1' • .1(Entlecmen1: I -7: ErJOILV /*JJURY (Pe' nerson': fp FOUL' iNJURV (Per J.:I:Jew); $ PROPERTY DAMAGE ( (Pe' ac:oent` I EACH OCCL,RRENZE AG',:giEGATE WC STAnk 10T1-4- E E;--CH ACC:JO:ENT E.1LSEAS - EA EMPLO‘'EE E.C;SE/1SE - POLJE-.1$ Ith/ST $ 1,000,000 1,000,000 DESCRIPTION OF OPERATIONS / LOCATIONS / VEHICLES lAtiach ACORD 101, Additional Remarks Schedule, h more space is reouired) Spring Sprint 3-Hour Adventure Race: June 2, 2012. Certificate holder is an additional insured but only with respect to liability arising out of the operations of the above named insured. This policy is issued, pursuant to Iowa Code section 515.147, by a nonadmitted company in Iowa and as such is not covered by the Iowa Insurance Guaranty Association." CERTIFICATE HOLDER CANCELLATION SHOULD ANY OPINE ABOVE DESCRIBED POLICIES BE CANCELLED BEFORE THE EXPIRATION DATE THEREOF, NOTICE WILL BE DELIVERED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE POLICY PROVISIONS Washington County 1515 Keats Avenue N Lake Elmo, MN 55042 ACORD 25 (2010/05) INS025 /7ni,n.,: 51 AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Scott Ziller/MEG Cc' 1988-2010 ACORD CORPORATION. All rights reserved. ArriPr. namo and ar. rtanictcarcarl rnnrlrcrrf tirsnian AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 9 Speak Your Peace — Resolution Adopting the 9 Tools of Civility as Principles of Conduct Alyssa MacLeod, Taxpayer Relations and Communications Coordinator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED 0 ER OF BUSINESS: - Introductionof Item ..................... ........ ..... ...... . ..... .......... ....... Staff Report/Presentation......... ....... . ........ ..................... ..... ........ .......... ......... Staff Questions from Council to Staff ......... ..... ....... ........................ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate ..... ................ ............. Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ...... ............ ..... ..... ....... Mayor & City Council - Discussion Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ........ ............................................................... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: As part of Lake Elmo's Speak Your Peace Civility Project, the City Council is respectfully requested to consider approving Resolution No. 2013-28, to incorporate the nine tools of civility as the foundational principles of conducting the business of the council. Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-28, with the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-28 adopting the nine tools of civility" BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Speak Your Peace is a campaign focused on improving civil discourse through raising awareness of nine tools of civility (basic principles of respect). The nine tools of civility are Pay attention; Listen; Be inclusive; Do not gossip; Show respect; Be agreeable; Apologize; Give constructive criticism; and Take responsibility. The original Speak Your Peace Civility Project was founded in 2003 in the Duluth Superior area. The City of Lake Elmo is adopting the project, starting with the nine tools of civility, to increase and improve civic engagement within the community, and cultivate a local governing environment that is conducive to effective and informed decision making. The campaign will be led by City staff and council, in collaboration with other community leaders. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-28 to adopt the nine tools of civility as part of the Lake Elmo Speak Your Peace campaign, with the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-28 adopting the nine tools of civility" ATTACHMENT: . Resolution No. 2013-28 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-28 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE NINE RULES OF CIVILITY WHEREAS, the residents of the city of Lake Elmo place a high value on respect and civility in their lives and they understand that these characteristics are essential to any healthy community; and WHEREAS, the Lake Elmo City Council supports opportunities for civil discourse and discussion in the community and at City Hall; and WHEREAS, the city council sometimes addresses controversial issues about which people often feel passionately, which at times leads to uncivil behavior; and WHEREAS, an atmosphere of incivility and disrespect can have a damaging eff n the proceedings, on the quality of debate, and on the practice of dernocracy itself; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council recognizes nine tools of civility that will provide increased opportunities for civil discourse in order to find positive resolutions to the issues that face our city. These tools include: ect o (a) Pay attention; (b) Listen; (c) Be inclusive; (d) Do not gossip; (e) Show respect; (f) Be agreeable; (g) Apologize; (h) Give constructive criticism; (i) Take responsibility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Lake Elmo City Council shall promote the use and adherence of these tools in conducting the business of the council. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal) Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-28 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: 04/16/2013 REGULAR ITEM #: 10 MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Consider Approval of a New Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company Located at 3511 Lake Elmo Avenue North. SUBMITTED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item....................... ..... .................... ....... ......... ..... ................... City Clerk Questions from Council to Staff, if any. ....... ...... ...... ...........Mayor Facilitates Public Hearing. ..... . ........... ..... . ....... ...... ......... . ...... ........................Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ........ ........ . ........... ..... ..... . ....... ..... ...Mayor & City Council Discussion, if any ................... ..... ....... .................. .......... . ....... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion ........ ........................................... ...... ............. .Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY & ACTION REOUESTED: It is respectfully requested that the City Council approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company, located at 3511 Lake Elmo Avenue North by applicant Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand LLC. Following the required public hearing, staffrecommends Council approve the application by taking the following action: "Move to approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at 3511 Lake Elmo Ave. North to Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand, LLC., pending approval by the Washington County Sheriff" BACKGROUND & STAFF REPORT: The City previously has granted, and renewed every year since, an Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at the same location to Kim Ommerbom, the current owner of Lake Elmo Wine Co. For personal reasons, Ms. Omrnerborn is selling the business to Calvin Wilkens, owner of 5 Grand. LLC. Mr. Wilkens is asking that the Off -Sale License he transferred to his company. He is retaining the assumed name Lake Elmo Wine Company and plans to continue to operate the shop as is. The City has received the completed application, associated fees, and proof of insurance. Approval by the Washington County Sheriff is still pending. RECOMMENDATION: As the application is in order, staff respectfully recommends that the City Council approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company by taking the following action: "Move to approve a new Off -Sale Intoxicating Liquor License for Lake Elmo Wine Company at 3511 Lake Elmo Ave. North to Calvin Wilkens, 5 Grand, LLC., pending approval by the Washington County Sheriff" ATTACHMENT(S): None (a copy of the Application is on file for review 2 MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: CONSENT ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 11 AGENDA ITEM: Minnesota Investment Fund Application for Valley Cartage Group, Inc. - Resolution Authorizing City of Lake Elmo to Apply for MIF dollars SUBMITTED BY: Beckie Gumatz, Program Assistant THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Adam Bell, City Clerk SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introductionof Item... ....... ......................... ....... ....... ..... ....... ........ Staff Report/Presentation.............. ..... ................ ... Staff Questions from Council to ......... ..... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate.......... ....... ................. ........... . ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion............... ..... ..... ......... Mayor & City Council Discussion.. ........... ....... ............ ........ ............ Mayor & City Council Action on Motion.... ........ ............. ................................. Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The Lake Elmo City Council will he asked to approve a Resolution allowing the City of Lake Elmo to apply for a forgivable loan from the Minnesota Investment Fund on behalf of Valley Cartage Group, Inc. Staff recommends Council approve the Resolution by taking the following action: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-29, A uthorizing an Application to the State of Minnesota Financing Program, the Minnesota Investment Fund, in the Amount of up to $500,000 Pr Valle), Cartage Group, Inc." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Minnesota Investment Fund provides financing to help add new workers and retain high - quality jobs on a statewide basis. The focus is on industrial, manufacturing, and technology - related industries to increase the local and state tax base and improve economic vitality statewide. Funds are awarded to local units of government who provide loans to assist expanding businesses. Cities, counties, townships, and recognized Indian tribal governments are eligible for this fund. All projects must meet minimum criteria for private investment, number of jobs created or retained, and wages paid. There is a maximum of 8500,000 per project. Only one award per state fiscal year may be provided to a government unit. At least 50 percent of total project costs must be privately financed through owner equity and other lending sources. Valley Cartage Group, Inc., a Wisconsin based company, will occupy the first floor of a building located at 8665 Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota for the purpose of expanding their transportation and logistics company. The facility will be used as a corporate headquarters and the office of the sales and logistics components of a full -service transportation company. It is expected that up to 50 new jobs will be created in the state of Minnesota. The jobs are expected to generate an annual payroll of $2.5 million and have an estimated impact of $12 million on the local economy. The range of average annual earnings per job is expected to be 830,000-$92,000, with an average of approximately $50,000. The building will be owned by a real estate holding company, Norman James LLC, a Minnesota Limited Liability Company and leased to Valley Cartage Group, Inc. STAFF REPORT: The Minnesota Investment Fund is a great tool used by cities to aid in business and economic development. It helps provide incentives for companies outside of Minnesota to locate in our state. The loans are attractive to businesses because they are offered up front and can be used to offset capital expenditures — often equipment purchases. Over the last 8 years, the program has funded 53 projects, creating thousands of new, good -paying jobs across Minnesota. The City of Lake Elmo and Washington County have also passed Resolutions allowing property tax abatement for the property owned by Norman James, LLC (8665 Hudson Boulevard), in order to incentivize Valley Cartage Group, Inc. to expand its business into Minnesota. In addition to the money from the Minnesota Investment Fund and the property tax abatement, City staff has taken the lead and worked closely with Governor Dayton, our legislative representatives, MnDEED, Washington County, Greater MSP, and Xcel to put together an economic development package that will also include job training funds and energy credits which have further enticed Valley Cartage Group, Inc. to expand into Minnesota. 2 REcOMMENDATION: Based on the preceding information, the staff recommends the following: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-29, Authorizing an Application to the State of Minnesota Financing Program, the Minnesota Investment Fund, in the Amount of up to $500,000 fin. Valley Cartage Group, Inc." ATTACHMENTS; . Resolution No. 2013-29 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-29 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN APPLICATION TO THE STATE OF MINNESOTA FINANCING PROGRAM, THE MINNESOTA INVESTMENT FUND, IN THE AMOUNT OF UP TO $500,000 FOR VALLEY CARTAGE GROUP INC. BE IT RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo act as the legal sponsor for project(s) contained in the Local Government Information Form to be submitted on or about April 17, 2013, and that Beckic Gumatz and Dean Zuleger are hereby authorized to apply to the Department of Employment and Economic Development for funding of this project on behalf of the City of Lake Elmo. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has the legal authority to apply for financial assistance, and the institutional, managerial, and financial capability to ensure adequate construction, operation, maintenance and replacement of the proposed project for its design life. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has not incurred any costs and has not entered into any written agreements to purchase property. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has not violated any Federal. State, or local laws pertaining to fraud, bribery, kickbacks, collusion, conflict of interest or other unlawful or corrupt practice. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that upon approval of its application by the state, the City of Lake Elmo may enter into an agreement with the State of Minnesota for the above -referenced project(s), and that the City of Lake Elmo certifies that it will comply with all applicable laws and regulations as stated in all contract agreements and described on the Compliance Section of the Local Government Information Form. AS APPLICABLE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City of Lake Elmo has obtained credit reports and credit information from Valley Cartage Group Inc. and Jeffrey Buelow. its CFO/CIO. Upon review by the City of Lake Elmo and Applicant's Legal Counsel, no adverse findings or concerns regarding, but not limited to, tax liens, judgments, court actions, and filings with state, federal and other regulatory agencies were identified. Failure to disclose any such adverse inforniation could result in revocation or other legal action. Resolution No. 2013-29 NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that Beckie Gumatz and Dean Zuleger, or their successors in office, are hereby authorized to execute such agreements, and amendments thereto, as are necessary to implement the project(s) on behalf of the applicant. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-29 11 11 (Tr:KEPIMO AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: AYOR & COUNCIL CO UNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION 04/16 013 Ordinance No.08-074 Amending 97.21 Watercraft and Water Surface Regulations, 97.22 Winter Lake Use Regulations and 97.23 Prohibited Structures and Uses Dean Zuleger, City Administrator at the request of Council Member Park & Council Member Bloyer Mayor Michael Pearson Dean Zuleger, City Administrator SUGGESTED ORDER OF' BUSINESS: Introduction of Item ..... City Administrator Report/Presentation.. „ ....... ...... ..... Administrator Questions from Council to Mayor Facilitates Public Comment Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion Mayor & City Council Discussion ......., ..... ................................ ....... .......... ..... Mayor & City Council Action on ...... ...... ..................... Mayor 1-7aeilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: To approve amendments to City Ordinances regulating watercraft regulations (ss 97.21), winter lake use regulations (ss 97.22) and prohibited structures and uses (ss 97.23). The amendments (attached) strive to expand the use of Lake Elmo lakes (Lake Elmo, Olson Lake, Lake Demontreville, Lake Jane) within current baseline MNDNR lake rules that apply to over 11,835 lakes across the State. Language that will not be changed include the establishment of an Ordinary High Water mark (OHW) that will prohibit wake creating activities if exceeded on Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville and the maintenance of a no wake, buoy marked channel between Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville. BACKGROUND INFORMATION: As a follow-up to ordinance changes approved in July 2012, (2) members of the City Council have requested further modifications that would eliminate wake creating time restrictions on all -- page City Council Meeting April 16. 2013 lakes, counter -clockwise travel on lakes when creating wakes, and certain other local lake use regulations that are more restrictive than MNDNR standards currently applied on over 11,835 lakes in the State of Minnesota. STAFF REPORT: During the summer of 2011 & winter of 2012. staff worked with the MNDNR to craft an ordinance that would meet with all party's approval. Specifically, MNDNR did not want to specify a specific elevation level for no wake imposition on Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville and they wished to make the City Code consistent with MN Statute 86 — governing motorized water craft operation. After several months of MNDNR review and text changes, staff brought a draft ordinance to the City Council for their review on June 5, 2012. At this time several lake shore residents expressed their dislike for the draft as they felt that the statutory norrning that took place defeated the intent and purpose of the ordinance. It was agreed that the City Administrator and members of the Tri-Lakes association would meet with MNDNR officials to discuss specific concerns about lake elevation levels and a provision of state statutes that creates a slow, no wake speed for personal watercraft within 150 feet of shoreline. A delegation from Lake Elmo consisting of Mayor Dean Johnston, Administrator Dean Zuleger, Tri-Lakes President Justin Bloyer and Lake Olson Association President Roger Johnson met with MNDNR's Kim Elverum, Boat & Water Safety Coordinator, to broker a compromise and clarify whether MN Statute 86 had preemption over local ordinances. At this meeting, it was agreed that if MNDNR technical staff agreed to the specific lake level definition of 929.7, the ordinance passed in July 2011 could stand permanently. The City Administrator spoke with MDNR technical staff (Schodeen) who had no objections to a pre-deten-nined ordinary high water mark of 929.7 (MSL). In the meeting with Elverum, it was noted that the MN Statute 86B.313 ("the 150' rule") is specifically directed at personal water craft — jet skis, water bikes, et al — and not traditional motorboats. This statute did preempt local ordinances for safety purposes. Appropriate changes were made to the ordinance and were reviewed by Mr. Roger Johnson, Mr. Justin Bloyer and Mayor Dean Johnson for approval prior to final drafting. In July of 2012, the City of Lake Elmo and affected land owners residing on the shores of Lake Olson, Lake Demontreville and Lake Jane crafted an amendment to current city code that would regulate the use of three lakes in the area known as the Tri-Lake area of the City of Lake Elmo. After considerable debate, the parties reached a consensus on three main areas: 1 A slow, no wake speed condition be set if the lake level of 929.7 feet above sea level is exceeded for five consecutive days for Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville; 2. Motorboat operation that causes wake may be allowed on Lake Jane between 9:00 AM and sunset; 3. Motorboat races, tournaments et al are allowed only as specifically authorized by State Statutes and Rules, the Washington County Sheriff. and City Council. Notice shall be provided to the City Council. 2 City Council Meeting April 16. 2013 The City Council adopted these changes in July 2012, but the issue has been fraught with anxiety and high emotion as lakeshore owners wrestle with the important issues regarding, what is essentially, their backyard. Efforts over the years to determine the appropriate wake related use (especially time restrictions) have resulted in neighborhood surveys, long deliberations by the respective homeowner's associations, a degree of personal invective, and exploration of additional changes that include but are not limited to eliminating wake on the lakes altogether. In the March of 2013, two City Council Members requested that the City's current lake use ordinances be modified yet again to create an expansion of use allowed under MNDNR statutes for the purpose of more hours for wake creation a better ability to enforce proper use, and to allow additional time for lakeshore owners to use their "backyard" before the lakes are congested via use by the general public. The request came late at the March 5th City Council Meeting. Since the request and at the time of this writing, City staff has received 27 (out of 290 affected property owners) phone calls, emails, letters and personal visits from lakeshore owners regarding the issue. 17 responses were from Olson Lake / Lake Demontreville owners - where 10 responses were against any change and 8 responses were for the change. In addition, the Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville Homeowner's Association took a formal Board of Directors vote at their April 11, 2013 spring meeting that resulted in a 7-5 vote to not change the current ordinance. The largest land owner (albeit not a property tax payer) the Jesuit Retreat / Carmelite Monastery has also sent 2 pieces of correspondence stating their opposition to the current proposed changes mainly due to privacy / trespass concerns related to the solitary nature of their operations. A 2011 survey of these two lakes revealed that 70% of lake owners fundamentally support a noon time restriction — although the validity of the survey has been routinely questioned. The results of this survey may be presented at the Council Meeting. 5 responses were from Lake Jane land owners where the 9 AM change has been in effect for one use season. 4 were in favor of the proposed ordinance and 1 was opposed out of a concern for the loon population on the lake. 3 responses came from Lake Elmo, all in favor of the changes. One response came from a non -Lake Elmo resident (Stillwater fisherman). The total tally for the proposed change (via response to City Hall) was 15 for the change and 11 against the change with 90% from Olson Lake and Lake Demontreville. An informational flyer, vvebsite / Facebook posting were distributed to all affected landowners on April Nth, 2013 that may produce more response that will he presented at the April 16"City Council meeting. The flyer used a word, "alignment", that is highly interpretive and may have led some to believe that the current ordinance is not approved by the MNDNR. A more appropriate way to explain the change would be that the ordinance would be expanding lake use in alignment with the general guidelines of the MNDNR. This word will be clarified at the meeting. City Council Meeting April 16, 2013 KEY ISSUES: During the course of the preliminary public comment on the proposed amendment five policy key issues have been identified: 1 Increased wake creating public access to the lakes will make it difficult for lake shore owners to enjoy peace and quiet, especially on the weekends; 2. Current wake restrictions make it difficult for lake shore owners to safely use the lake for their own activities due to the compressed usage time and competition from the general public for lake use; 3 Longer periods of unrestricted, wake creating, lake usage will increase the probability of the introduction of invasive species to Lake Elmo lakes; 4. The two varied time restrictions of wake creation create an enforceability problem from Washington County law enforcement; 5. Increased wake may compound shore land erosion problems. In addition, a few ancillary issues have been identified that include property trespass. boat ramp access/ abuse and operating while intoxicated. The specifics of these issues will be discussed with Washington County Sheriff s Department. From an economic / property value standpoint several land owners have expressed concern that the time restrictions will make it difficult for them to sell their homes — this has been confirmed by a discussion with two realtors who specialize in lake home sales in the metro areas. The point was amplified by two Olson Lake residents who expressed disappointment in the fact that they did not know of the restrictions when purchasing their homes and would not have done so, if they had known the restrictions. RELATIONSHIPS: There is one point of commonality in the ongoing lake use debate and that is the basic fact that lake shore property owners are weary of the ongoing discussion which causes division and anxiety. Parties on both side of the debate have expressed some regret that issue has been brought up again and simply desire peace in their neighborhoods. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the background information, a review of key issues, discussion with past & present MNDNR staff, discussion with lake shore owners, and a policy of property use equity, the staff recommends that the City of Lake Elmo City Council: Motion: Approve Ordinance 08-074, to amend 97.21 of the City Code regulating watercraft and water surface regulations. 97.22 winter lake use regulations and 97.23 (L) prohibited structures and uses as presented. ATTACHMENTS: Ordinance 08-074 4 City mfLake Elmo Ordinance 08-074(Proposed) ' (Re -Created and Amended to Read As Follows) FT AND WATER SURFACE USE REGULATIONS. Tile followin2 reoulations shall apply to the use of watercraft oil lakes entirely within the c1tv limits. to tile use of a lake entirely within the citN limits. and to tile use of ice surfaces oil lakes entirely within the city limits. (A) Hours ofol)eration-. (|) Nhro,u/cond//oms. Noperson shall operate any, motorboat s¢uspeed greater than o slow, no -wake speed as defined by M.S. 8 8613,005 between sunset and sunrise tile foUovvinL, day. (Z) /{i'h omoy' condii.ions. No person shall operate any motorboat at greater than u x|o`+, no -wake speed as defined by M.S. 6 868.005 whenever the lake |cvc) of Lakes Olson and 0ennon1rcri||e is uhnvc 929.7 ftc1 above sea |nvc| (MSL) [b,five consecutive days. This restriction will remain in effect until the water level drops below 929.7feet, and o:/nuioaihcrc for five consecutive days. (B) ions, Noperson sbu|| operate any watercraft in violation of the provisions ofthis code. or in violation V[ihc provisions u[M.8. Chapter 868or Minnesota Boat and Water Sefc1yRules (6||U.0lO0'6||0.2]O0)which statutes and rules are hereby adopted and incorporated herein. In the event o[mconflict between the various city and state nc�o|etionu'themore restrictive reaulation shall apply. ([,) pcnnoncn/ ' slow - no xn6e: oreus The channels and narrows 6cLv/cen Lake Olson and Lake Demontreville are hereby designated as permanent -slow - no wake" areas and appropriate signs orbuoys meeting the specifications found inMinn. Rules 6ll0.|5O0shall be posted. (/\nn.Ord. Y7-|jU.passed 3-\-2005�Aon.Ord. 08'0|4,passed 5-|q-2O09,Am. Ord. A0'050, passed 7-l9-20ll:Am. Ord. V8-j0,passed ||-l-2U|):/\no. Ord. 2012-5B'passed 7'17- � (Re-created and Amended to Read As � @97.22 WINTER LAKE USE REGULATIONS. (A) Clean-up Ice house owners are responsible for clean-up oftrash vwhhinZ5 feet of tile (B) Ice fishing holes. No person shall leave holes in the lake larger than I foot in diameter unless the holes are visibly marked for day and night. (C .) Fires. No person shall have an open fire on the ice surface of a lake. (1997 Code, § 1380.04) ! (97.23 is Proposed to Be Stricken in its Entirety) Coune-it (5) ki-Htny-a-nc.-41-1-afeF-o-r 41997 ('ode. § 1380.06) (Am. ()rd. 2012 58, ptt4sed 7 17 2012 March staff.to time re cons�c gove allow (6no Noise / Disorderly. ©nireville Trespass 1t isorde Smallest lake allowing motor boats in Metro Olson Lake Olson Lake / Lake Demontreville Championship Bass Fishing Lake Smaller, Narrow Lakes impacted by: - growing sand bars - narrow channels Catholic Retreat / Monastic Complex relies on serenity / quieter setting Lake Issues: - sand bars create narrow water ski course (counter -clockwise} - wake creation in channel area compounds erosion - public use creates trespass & disorderly conduct on Catholic campus - limited landing parking causes boat trailer parking violations Public Input: 23 for No Change 16 for Change Recent HOA Board Vote: 7-5 No Change 2oii Surve ielded 7o% for No Change Lake El - Longest governed la Elmo e in ake -Impacted by Lake Elmo Park Reserve 25o,000 visitors per year - most boat landing parking Lake Issues: Milfoil/Invasive Species - Shoreland Erosion - Sunset Enforcement - Wakeboard Noise Public Input: 13 for No Change 3 for Change Property Owner Survey: 53/54 surveyed for No Change **8 not surveyed (Treml} Least publically accessible governed lake Annual slalom course buoy placement 8 boat landing parking stalls Lake Issues: - Loon Population - Directional Confusion Public Input: l8 for No Change e 1 P 5 for Change Constance 6517797803 p.1 Faxing 2 pages including this page: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator Citv of Lake Elmo April 16, 2013 Dear Dean, Would you please make a copy of this letter, "Public Record". Thank you Regards, Constance Northrup 651-278-8196 FAX 651-779-7803 Constance 6517797803 p 2 Grail - What is the Secrecy aril RUSH? You are affecting so marry peop,.. htlps://nrail.goOgle.com/mailr?ut-.2&tk=e14-413704adz.vicw=p1LicSeartn... c. northrup <cn h u What is the Secrecy and RUSH? You are affecting so many people. Please Delay this vote. c. northrup <criorthrup0@9maa.com> Tue. Apr 16, 2013 at 10:16 AM To: mikepearson1965@yahoo,com, jbloyerQlakeelmo.org, wally@morrowoartnersinc.com, Ilcok3 Park <nikkipark@comcastnet›, annejsmith© rnsn .co m Bcc Steve Delapp <stevedelapp@gmail.com> Dear Council Members and Mayor, This is one of those few defiring moments in your careers as F1'epresentatives of the people. Clearly there are many that are not in favor of the proposed changes and many are landowners whose way of life will be adversely affected. I am not only referring to the land owners on the lake but the wildlife as well. You will notice that in just a last minute Saturday morning a petition was signed against this action. There was no petition in favor, Please delay this vote and explore a options and find out what the majority of the people in Lake Elmo want and what is best and safest for the residents. A delay with a period ot exploration the only possible action of won," fully knowing that there were already enough votes to pass without your vote , since it is too easy to say, " 1 voted against it....but it I am certain you all know this is a huge decision that deserves more than a last minute rush vote that leaves the voters wondering what and whose agenda this really was, I trust you as a whole to show your support tor all of us to vote to delay and explore this proposal and to deny your personal wishes in order to properly represent the voters. Thank you, Constance Northrup 1 of 1 4/16/2013 12:05 PM MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: ORDINANCE AGENDA ITEM: Adoption of Revised Zoning Map SUBMITTED BY: Kyle Klatt, Director of Planning THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Nick Johnson, City Planner 04/16/2013 13 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of ..... ............ ........... ........... ..... Staff Report/Presentation...... ..... .............. ...... ..... ....... Staff Questions from Council to Staff.......... ...... ......... ......... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate.................. ...... ....... ..... ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion ....... ....... ..... ..... ......... ..... Mayor & City Council Discussion......................... ...... ..... ........ ........ Mayor & City Council Action on ........ .......... ......... Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT The Lake Elmo Zoning Map must be updated to be in compliance with the recently adopted Comprehensive Plan amendment for the 1-94 Corridor. SUMMARY ANpACT1ON REOUESTED: The City Council is being asked to adopt a revised Zoning Map for the City that incorporates the new Zoning Districts that have been approved as part of the Council's ongoing work to update the Zoning Ordinance. The proposed map incorporates all of the newly created zoning districts, but also leaves some of the existing categories in tact pending future amendments. Staff will be bringing forward further amendments to the Map once the Village Land Use Plan has been formally adopted by the City Council. Staff recommends the City Council adopt a revised Zoning Map for the City of Lake Elmo and take the following action / with the following motion: "Move to adopt Ordinance 08-075 amending Chapter. 154 of the City Code by adopting a new official Zoning District Map" BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: The Zoning Map serves as the key piece of the City's zoning regulations since it is the official document that designates the zoning district for any given property in the community. The zoning map also serves as the primary mechanism for implementing the Comprehensive Plan for the City, and this map is required to be consistent with the Comprehensive Plan in accordance with State Statutes. With the recent adoption of the revised land use plan for the 1-94 Corridor, Staff is recommending that the City Council consider revisions to the Zoning Map to align the map with the updated plan. In addition, the City has adopted several amendments to the Zoning Ordinance, including several new or amended zoning districts that should also be reflected on the map. Because the City is working on incremental updates to the Zoning Ordinance (as opposed to a complete overhaul of the entire ordinance at one time), the Zoning Map will also need to be amended in stages as this work progresses. The next major update to the map will incorporate the Village Land Use Plan, at which point the remaining rural districts should also be revised to remain consistent with the updated Comprehensive Plan. Please note that because some of the City's existing districts, including the GB — General Business District and R2 — Two Family Residential District have not yet been rescinded, these districts still are included on the Zoning Map. Should the City move forward with the Village Mixed Use Zoning. the GB district will no longer be used as a land use category either in the Zoning Ordinance or on the map. Staff is also still waiting the determine the most appropriate zoning for the existing R2 district until after the Village land use plan is adopted. Additionally. Staff is still researching the most appropriate manner in which to zone the parcels that have been identified as "in -holding" parcels for the Lake Elmo Park Reserve. There are several parcels in the southwest portion of the park that are guided for park purposes, and that are planned for future acquisition by the County for the expansion of the park. The other significant changes to the map as proposed are noted as follows: All existing holding zones have been eliminated from the map and replaced with the RT Rural Transition zoning district, with the exception of: o Three parcels immediately east of the Eagle Point Business Park that have been zoned C Cornmercial, o The Cimarron Manufactured Horne Park, which has been zoned MDR (a manufactured home park is allowed as a conditional use in this zone). o The parcels that make up the Brookman Addition north of 39th Street in the Village and the parcels that comprise the old lumber yard along the railroad right-of-way. These parcels retain their GB zoning since they represent existing platted lots with the Village planning area. o The small commercial parcel within Cimmaron at the intersection of l Oth Street and Lake Elmo Avenue that is zoned CC Convenience Commercial. The R-I Single Family Residential District is now called the RS — Rural Single Family District. A parcel at the intersection of 55th Street and Keats Avenue was zoned A Agriculture. Staff has previously found documentation that this parcel should be zoned RE Residential Estates similar to the other parcels in the Lake Eimo Vista Subdivision. The property east of Lake Jane that was at one time considered for a public works building has been changed hack to RR Rural Residential. The property on which the Holiday gas station is located at the intersection of Highway 5 and Manning Avenue has been changed from HB Highway Business to CC Convenience Commercial. 2 The Zoning Map now includes a revised municipal boundary that incorporates the northeast area detachment. The resulting parcel boundary includes a small parcel that retains the previous A Agriculture zoning in this area. • Parcels that were zoned Limited Business have been changed to LC Neighborhood Office/Limited Commercial. • The LDR, HDR, and VMX districts are listed as new districts, but do not yet show up on the map. Staff is recommending that the zoning within the future sewer service areas be addressed at the time subdivisions or other developments are proposed. As an alternative, the City may elect to rezone parcels in conjunction with public projects that extend sewer and water services into these areas. Staff will continue to revisit the Zoning Map as future text amendments are considered by the Council, and will also he bringing back further amendments to the map later this summer after the Village land use plan has been formally adopted by the City. PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT: The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing on the proposed Zoning Map amendment at its April 8, 2013 meeting. There were no public comments received concerning the map revisions, and the Commission unanimously recommended approval of the map as presented. RECOMMENDATION: Based upon the above background information, Staff report and Planning Commission recommendation. it is recommended that the City Council adopt the revised Zoning Map with the following motion: "Move to adopt Ordinance 08-075 amending Chapter 154 of the City Code by adopting a new official Zoning District Map" ATTACHMENT(S): I. Ordinance 08-075 1. Exhibit "A'. — Lake Elmo Zoning Map CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-075 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 154 OF THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADOPTIONG A NEW OFFICIAL ZONING DISTRICT MAP SECTION 1. The Zoning Map of the City of Lake Elmo established by the City Code, Section 154.351 is amended by deleting the existing Lake Elmo Zoning Map and adopting a new official Zoning Map which is attached and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". SECTION 2. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 3. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-075 was adopted on this 16th day of April 2013, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor Al I EST: Adam Bell, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-075 was published on the day of . 2013. MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment — Tree Preservation Ordinance SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Commission Kyle Klatt, Planning Director 04/16/2013 14 SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: - Introduction of ..... ....... . ..... Staff Report/Presentation.......................................................................Staff Questions from Council to Staff.......... ........... ........ Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate .......... .................... ................ ......... Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion................. ...... ...... ..... Mayor & City Council ........ ..... ...... ..... Mayor & City Council - Action on Motion.. ..... .......... ........ ..... ........ ........ Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is asked to consider a Zoning Text Amendment to adopt a Tree Preservation Ordinance as part of Article 6 — Environmental Performance Standards. The City Code currently does not contain any requirements related to tree preservation within development and grading activities. This Zoning Text Amendment is part of the ongoing effort to improve the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of future growth and development activity in Lake Elmo. The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-076 through the following moti077: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-0 76, establishing standards for tree preservation within development and grading activities" In addition, Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 2013-30, authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 08-076, through the lbllowing motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-30, authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 08-0 76." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: In preparation of upcoming development activity in the community, Staff is working on a project intended to make incremental improvements to the Lake Elmo Zoning Code. While working on this project, Staff identified tree preservation or protection measures as an area of Zoning Code improvement. Ordinances related to tree preservation are common among communities in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. In fact, Lake Elmo is one of few communities researched by Staff that does not employ provisions related to tree preservation or protection. There are a number of reasons that cities engage in tree preservation, including, but not limited to, 1) increasing and maintaining property values: 2) protecting privacy by maintaining natural buffers between land uses; 3) promoting sound storm water practices; 4) reducing soil erosion and sedimentation; 5) improved air quality; and 6) maintaining tree and wildlife habitat to the best extent possible. While tree removal is a necessary part of land development and major grading activity, it the goal of tree preservation or protection measures to minimize or mitigate significant tree removal. The Planning Commission has done significant work as part of working through the Tree Preservation Ordinance. Staff originally presented an ordinance aimed at tree preservation on March 11, 2013. At the meeting, the Planning Commission requested that additional research be conducted by Staff to identify the best approach to tree preservation. At the workshop on March 25, Staff presented findings from various ordinances around the twin cities (outlined in attachment #3), and the Planning Commission identified the City of Woodbury's ordinance to be the most complete and effective. As directed by the Planning Commission, Staff prepared the proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance based upon the approach employed in Woodbury. After presenting the ordinance at the meeting on April S. 2013, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval with some minor refinements, The proposed Tree Preservation Ordinance ( 154.257) is applicable to all development, subdivision and major grading, activity, and includes the following key features: As part of the activities mentioned above, applicants are required to submit a Tree Preservation Plan. This most often occurs at the Preliminary Plat stage of land subdivision. As part of the Tree Preservation Plan, applicants are allowed to remove 30% of the total diameter inches of significant trees on the site without triggering tree replacement. Significant trees are defined with the ordinance according to tree type (common, coniferous/evergreen or deciduous hardwood). • If tree replacement is required, the applicant must follow the Tree Replacement Schedule. which calls for the following levels of replacement: o Conunon tree replacement: 1/4 of the diameter inches removed to be replaced. o Coniferous tree replacement: 1/2 of the diameter inches removed to be replaced. o Deciduous hardwood tree replacement: 1/2 of the diameter inches removed to be replaced. Through the levels of tree replacement, as well as the methodology to tally tree removal, the ordinance places a priority or preference towards hardwood deciduous trees, and secondarily coniferous trees. The ordinance outlines various procedural elements related to compliance of the Tree Preservation Plan, as well protective measures to be employed to ensure perfomiance. The ordinance includes a permitting requirement for the removal of specimen trees (healthy trees above 30- of diameter breast height in size) in urban district. The reason for this is two -fold: 1) in urban districts with more density, the removal of such large trees can often pose a risk of safety and property damage to adjacent properties; and 2) in higher density districts, tree loss of that magnitude has a greater impact of amenity loss, warranting some replacement. Finally, the ordinance acknowledges the possibility where tree preservation goals may conflict with other City objectives. Therefore, the ordinance allows for exceptions to be granted as long as certain circumstances are met. When comparing the proposed ordinance to other preservation and protection ordinances, it is less onerous or restrictive than other ordinances in the Twin Cities Metropolitan Area. For example, the tree replacement schedule in Medina, another developing community in the Metro, is a 1:1 replacement of diameter inches of significant trees removed. This is significantly higher than what is required in the proposed ordinance. hi addition, other conununities often have lower thresholds for allowed tree removal before tree replacement is required. Also, it should be noted that tree replacement in cases of commercial properties do count towards landscaping requirements. This allowance is related to the greater need of impervious surface for commercial properties. Other communities that were reviewed, with the exception 2 of Woodbury, do not count tree replacement towards landscaping requirements. For further comparisons, please reference the comparison chart in attachment #3. Finally, making use of a similar preservation approach that is utilized in Woodbury offers two benefits: 1) utilizing a similar strategy or approach offers applicants the benefit of continuity and working from an established standard; 2) The fact that this approach is utilized in Woodbury demonstrates that the procedure and requirements have not been a hindrance to development activity. It should be noted that the proposed ordinance and Woodbury's ordinance do include some minor differences, including: Woodbury's replacement schedule includes lower amounts of replacement for common (I/ replacement) and coniferous (1/4 replacement) trees, However, given how tree removals are tallied in both ordinances, it is less likely that common and coniferous trees will be replaced than deciduous hardwood trees. Both ordinances place a higher priority on hardwood deciduous trees. • Woodbury's ordinance includes provisions for non -developing properties. Given the rural nature of the Lake Elmo community, Staff recommends to leave non -developing properties out of tree preservation requirements. It is the goal of the Tree Preservation Ordinance to minimize and mitigate tree loss during development and grading activities. Measures related to tree preservation and protection have become established practice in development activity in the Twin cities Metropolitan Area and beyond. Given that Lake Elmo is a Tree City USA (11`11 year) and has excellent natural resources, some form of tree preservation or protection is recommended in advance of future development activity. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-076 through the 011owing motion: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-0 76, establishing srandardsJor tree preservation within development and grading activities" In addition, Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No, 2013-30, authorLing summaly publication of Ordinance 08-076, through the fillowitm motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-30, authorizing summaty publication of Ordinance 08-0 76." ATTACEIMENT(S): 1. Ordinance 08-076 2. Resolution No. 2013-30 3. Tree Preservation Ordinance Comparison Chart CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OFWASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO,08-076 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADOPTING TREE PRESERVATION STANDARDS FOR ALL DEVELOPMENT AND MAJOR GRADING ACT|VITIES, SECTION 1, The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by adding the following language: ARTICLE 6. ENVIRONMENTAL PERFO 5154.250 Purpose §154.357 Tree Preservation * ^ CE STANDARDS 5154'250 Purpose The purpose wfthis section is to p/mvk]c regulations o/ general applicability for property throughout the City that are intended to protect orenhance natural resources and processes' and minimize conflicts among (and uses. §154.257 Tree Preservation A. Purpose. Within the city ofLake Elmo, trees and woodlands are considered avaluable asset tn the community. The City places priority on protecting this asset and finds that it is in the best interest to regulate the development and alteration of wooded areas within the community. All builders, developers and subdividers shall comply with all the provisions in the Zoning Code which address the preservation ofexisting significant trees. All builders, developers and subdividers are encouraged to preserve all healthy trees of significant value even if the trees do not meet the size requirements to be considered significant trees. B. Definitions, The following words, terms and phrases, when used in this secdon, shalt have the meanings ascribed to them in this subsection, except where the context clearly indicates a different meaning: [unrnnon Tree. Includes Ash, Aspen, Basswood, Box Eider. Catalpa, Cottonwood, Elm, Hackberry' Locust, Poplar, Silver Maple, YYi(knw and any other tree not defined as hardwood deciduous tree oraconiferous/ evergreen tree. [oniferous/Evergreen Tree. Avvood piant, which, at maturity, is at least twelve (12) feet or more inheight, having foliage onthe outermost portion mfthe branches yea/'round. Tamaracks are included asaconiferous tree species. Critical Root Zone ([8Z). An imaginary circle surrounding the tree trunk with a radius distance of one (1) foot per one (1) inch of tree diameter. E.g. a twenty -inch diameter has a critical root zone with a radius of twenty (ZO) feet. Deciduous Hardwood Tree. Includes Birch, Cherry, Hickory, Ironwood, Hard Maples, Oak and Walnut. Diameter Breast Height (DBUf). The diameter of trees at breast height, measured 1/2 feet (54 inches) above the ground. Drip Line. The farthest distance away from the trunk ofutree that rain ordew will fall directly to the ground from the leaves or the branches of the tree. Nuisance Tree. (1) Any living or standing tree or part thereof infected to any degree with a shade tree disease orshade tree pest; (2)Any Logs, stumps' branches, firewood or other part of dead or dying tree(s) infected with a shade tree disease orshade tree pest unless property treated; and (3) Any standing dead trees or limbs which may threaten human health or property. Shade Tree Disease. Dutch elm disease (UphiosLomn uimi orOphiostoma novo uimi), oak wilt ([eratocystis fagaccarum) orany other tree disease of epidemic nature. Significant Tree 4healthy tree measuring a minimum of six (6) inches in diameter for hardwood deciduous trees, eight (8) inches in diameter for coniferous/ evergreen trees' or twelve (1I) inches in diameter for common trees, as defined herein. Specimen Tree. A healthy tree measuring equal Luorgreater than thirty (30) inches in diameter breast height, Tree Preservation Plan. A plan prepared by certified forester or landscape architect indicating all ofthe significant trees inthe proposed development orparcel. The Tree Preservation Plan includes a tree inventory which includes the size, species and location of all significant trees proposed tobesaved and removed on the area ofdevelopment, and the measures proposed to protect the significant trees to be saved. C. Tree Preservation Standards for Developing Properties 1. Applicability. a. 4Tnee Preservation Plan shall be submitted and approved for the following activities: i. New Development /n Any Zoning District. 4Tree Preservation Plan shall be required aspart ofany development orsubdivision application. ii. Any grading o,excavation project that result inthe movement nfgreater than 400 cubic yards ofmaterial per acre ofsite per 8151.O17. b. 4Tree Preservation Plan is not required for the following activities: i. This section does not apply tothe issuance o{adevelopment approval for asingle- family residenceon an existing platted lot ofrecord. ii. This section does not apply tothe harvesting of trees. For purposes ofthis section, "harvesting" means cutting orclearing trees for purposes relating toforestry operations, asdefined in§l54.O12. ''Han/esting"does not include the clearing of land for the purposes of development, even where the trees are sold for purposes of creating lumber for related purposes. 2. Tree Preservation Plan. 4U applicants shall submit a tree preservation plan prepared by certified forester or landscape architect in accordance with the provisions of this section. During the review ofan application for a building permit, grading permit orPreliminary Plat, the tree preservation plan wit[ bereviewed according tothe best layout topreserve significant trees and the efforts of the subdivider to mitigate damage to significant trees. 3. Tree Preservation Plan Requirements. The Tree Preservation Pion shalt bea separate plan sheet(s)that includes the following information: a. The name(s), certification Is), telephone number(s) and address(es) of the person(s) responsible for tree preservation during the course ofthe development project. 2 b. Tree Inventory. The Tree Preservation Plan must include aTree Inventory through one of the following methods: i. Tree Inventory Individual. An individual inventory including on identification system linked to metal field tags located four and one-half (4.5) feet from grade on all significant trees. The quantity, size species' health and location of at[ significant trees must beidentified on a plan sheet in both graphic and tabular form. ii. Tree Inventory Sampling. In cases ofsites with Large tracts ofsignificant trees, the City may approve the use of a sampling inventory for all or portions of a site as an alternative tuanindividual inventory. The sampling inventory must include the methodology for sampling, identification ribbon around the perimeter ofthe sampling areas, and metal field tags located four and one-half (4.5)feet from grade onall significant trees inthe sampling area. Within the sampling area, the quantity, size, specics, health and Location of all significant trees must be identified unaplan sheet inboth graphic and tabular form. Based onsampling, total estimates and locations ofhealthy significant trees shall be provided. iii. Tree Inventory Combination. With the approval ofthe City, sites that include both Large tracts nfsignificant trees and areas ofindividual significant trees may utilize acombination ofthe individual and sampling inventory methods. c. Trees that were planted as part ofa commercial business such as tree farm or nursery do not need to be inventoried on an individual tree basis. A general description of the trees and an outer boundary of the planted area must be provided. The burden of proof shall be on the applicant to provide evidence to support the finding that the trees were planted as part of commercial business. d. Alisting ofhealthy significant trees inventoried insubsection (b)above. Dead, diseased ordying trees donot need tnbeincluded inthe totals. e. 4 Listing nfthe healthy significant trees removed, identified by the metal field tag or some other form of identification used in the tree inventory in subsection (b) above. f. A Listing ofthe healthy significant trees to remain, identified bythe metal field tag or some other form of identification used in the tree inventory in subsection (b) above, gOuter boundary ofall contiguous wooded areas, with a general description of trees not meeting the significant tree size threshold. h. Locations of the proposed buUdings, structures, orimpervious surfaces. i. Delineation nfall areas tobegraded and limits of[and disturbance. j. Identification ofall significant trees proposed to be removed within the construction area. These significant trees should be identified in both graphic and tabular form. k. Measures to protect significant trees. L. Size, species' number and Location of all replacement trees proposed to be planted on the property in accordance with the Mitigation Plan, if necessary. m. Signature of the person(s) preparing the plan. 4. Implementation. All sites shalt bpstaked, as depicted in the approved Tree Preservation Plan, and the required tree protection fencing shalt beinstalled around the critical root zone before land disturbance isLncommence. The City shall inspect the construction site prior tothe beginning of the land disturbance to ensure that protective fencing and other protective measures are in place. No encroachment, land disturbance, trenching, filling, compaction, or change in soil chemistry shall occur within the fenced areas protecting the critical root zone of the trees tobesaved, 5. Allowable Tree Removal. Uptothirty (30) percent ofthe diameter inches of significant trees on any parcel of land being developed maybe removed without replacement requirements. Replacement according tothe Tree Replacement Schedule isrequired when removal exceeds more than thirty (jD) percent ofthe total significant tree diameter inches. The following types oftrees do not need to be included as part ofthe tally oftree a. Dead, diseased ordying trees; b. Trees that are transplanted from the site to another appropriate area within the city; c. Trees that were planted as part ofa commercial business, such as tree farm or nursery; or d. Trees that were planted by the current property owner, In making such a determination, the City shalt consider consistency nfthe age of the trees' any patterns in the location of trees, historical aerial photography and evidence o/intentional planting such msinvoices, formal planting plans urcost sharing agreements. 6. Mitigation Plan. a. In any development or grading project where the allowable tree removal is exceeded, the applicant shalt mitigate the tree toss byeither: i. Planting replacement trees in appropriate areas within the development in accordance with the Tree Replacement Schedule; ii. Planting replacement trees on City property under the direction of the Public Works Superintendent; or iii. Some combination of above subsections (i) and (ii) to total the equivalent number ofreplacement trees to meet the Mitigation Plan. b. The form of mitigation to be provided by the applicant shall be determined by the City. C. d. The planting oftrees for mitigation onresidential projects shalt beinaddition to any other landscape requirements ofthe City. All trees, with the exception o/ornamental trees, planted as landscaping on commercial ormixed-use projects may becounted towards tree replacement requirements. 7. Tree Replacement [o/o//obons. Thirty (30) percent of the total diameter inches of significant trees onthe site may beremoved without replacement. The allowable thirty (30) percent removal isfirst credited tothe common trees removed, then the conifers, and lastly the hardwood species. The following calculation procedure must be used to determine tree replacement requirements: a. Tally the total number u/diameter inches ofsignificant trees on the site. b. Calculate thirty (30) percent ofthe total diameter inches ofsignificant trees on the site. This is the allowable tree removal limit, or the number of inches that can be removed without replacement. c. Tatty the total diameter inches ofcommon trees that will be removed and subtract this number from the allowable tree removal limit. 4 d. If there are any allowable inches left, tally the total diameter inches of conifer/evcrgreen tree species that will be removed and subtract this number from the remaining allowable inches. e. If there are any allowable inches left, tally the total diameter inches of hardwood deciduous tree species that will be removed and subtract this number from the remaining allowable inches. [ |fatany point in the above calculation procedure (a'e) the number of inches to be removed exceeds the thirty (]O) percent allowable removal limit, the remaining inches nfremoval above the allowable limit must bereplaced according tothe Tree Replacement Schedule insubsection 8. 8. Tree Replacement Schedule. Tree removals over the allowable tree removal timit on the parcel shall bereplaced according tothe following schedule: a. b. C. d. Common tree species shall be replaced with new trees at m rate ofone-fourth (1/4) the diameter inches removed. [onifenous/evergreen tree species shalt be replaced with new coniferous or evergreen trees at rate ofone-half ( /z) the diameter inches removed. Since coniferous species are often sold by height rather than diameter inch, the following conversion formula can beused: Height ofReplacement Coniferous Tnee/2~Diameter Inches ofCredit. Hardwood deciduous tree species shalt be replaced with new hardwood deciduous trees at rate ofone-half ('/z)the diameter inches removed. Replacement Tree Size, Replacement trees must beaminimum ofone (1)inch in diameter. V. Spec/es Requirement. The City must approve all species used for tree replacement. Ornamental trees are not acceptable for use a» replacement trees. Where ten or more replacement trees are nequired, not more than thirty (]O) percent of the replacement trees shall beofthe same species of tree. Native species are encouraged, and hardiness and salt tolerance should beconsidered where applicable. 10. Warranty Requirement. Any replacement tree which is not alive or heo|thy, as determined by the City, or which subsequently dies due to construction activity within two (2) years after the date o{project closure shalt be removed bythe applicant and replaced with o new healthy tree meeting the same minimum size requirements within eight (8) months of removoL 11. Protective Measures. The Tree Preservation Plan shall identify and require the following measures to be utilized to protect significant trees planned for preservation: m. Installation ofsnow fencing orpolyethylene laminate safety netting placed atthe drip line oratthe perimeter ofthe critical root zone, whichever is greater, of significant trees, specimen trees and significant woodlands Lobepreserved. Nograde change, construction activity' or storage of materials shalt occur within this fenced in area. b. Identification of any oak trees requiring pruning between April 15 and July 1 . Any oak trees so pruned shalt be required to have any cut areas seated with an appropriate nontoxic tree wound sealant. c. Prevention ofchange in soil chemistry due toconcrete washout and leakage orspillage oftoxic materials, such asfuels orpaints. d. Removal of any nuisance trees located in areas to be preserved. 5 12. Compliance with the Tree Preservation Plan. The applicant shalt implement the Tree Preservation Pion prior to and during any construction. The tree protection measures shalt remain in place until aU land disturbance and construction activity is terminated or until a request to remove the tree protection measures is made to, and approved by, the City. a. No significant trees shalt be removed until a tree preservation plan is approved and except in accordance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. b. The City shalt have the right to inspect the development and/or building site in order todetermine compliance with the approved Tree Preservation Plan. The City shalt determine whether the Tree Preservation Plan has been met. c. Irreparable Damage. Where the City determines that irreparable damage has occurred to healthy significant tree that is designated to be preserved as part ofthe Tree Preservation Plan, the tree shalt be removed and replaced, and protective fencing shalt be provided. U. Specimen Trees. The removal of any specimen trees on a property located in any of the urban zoning districts shalt require a special permit and be subject to the Tree Replacement Schedule for the purpose of mitigating great tree toss. E. Financial Security. in cases where mitigation or tree replacement is required, the City may require that afinancial security, in o form acceptable to the City, be provided as part ofo development agreement or applicable permit to ensure compliance and performance of the Mitigation Plan. The financial security wit[ be released to the applicant upon verification by the City that the Mitigation Plan was followed, and that aK replacement trees are planted and in n reasonable state o/ health. The financial security may be used to replace any replacement trees that have become damaged or diseased after planting. F. Exceptions 1. Exception Standards. Notwithstanding the City'sdesire toaccomplish tree preservation and protection goats, there may bcinstances where these goals are in conflict with other City objectives. These conflicts will most likely occur on small, henviLy'wooded parcels. At the discretion of the City Council, exceptions may be granted if all of the following conditions a. The subject parcel isfive (5)acres in size or less; b. It is not feasible tocombine the subject parcel with adjacent parcels that could use the parcel osrequired green space; c. Strict adherence tothe Tree Preservation Ordinance would prevent reasonable development that is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and desirable to the City onthe parcel; and d. The exception requested is the minimum needed to accomplish the desired development, I. Reduced Mitigation for Exceptions. |fanexception isgranted, relief from the requirements nfthe ordinance may take the form of reduced mitigation requircments, greater aKovvabie tree removal, higher thresholds for determining significant trees, or any combination of the above. The City Council wit[ determine which form of relief best balances the objectives of the City and tree preservation. SECTION 2. Effective Date, This ordinance shalt become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake E[DOO' 6 SECTION 3. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08-076 was adopted on this sixteenth day of April 2013, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL Mike Pearson, Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Cterk This Ordinance 08-076 was published on the day of , 2013. 7 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-030 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 08-076 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-076, an ordinance to the City's regulations pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is lengthy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Ehno, that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. 08-076 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-076, which requires certain measures of tree preservation within development and major grading activities, including the following: Property owners or applicants engaging in development, subdivision or major grading activities must submit a Tree Preservation Plan; Property owners or applicants are allowed to remove up to 30% of the diameter inches of significant trees without requiring tree replacement. • When tree replacement is required, property owners or applicants must follow the Tree Replacement Schedule to calculate the required amount of replacement trees. The full text of Ordinance No. 08-076 is available for inspection at Lake Elmo city hall during regular business hours. Resolution No. 2013-30 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo that the City Administrator keep a copy of the ordinance at City Hall for public inspection and that a full copy of the ordinance he placed in a public location within the City. Dated: April 16, 2013. ATTEST: Adam Bell, City Clerk (SEAL) Mayor Mike Pearson The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2013-30 Ordinance Proposed Ordinance (4'lG'l3) City of Woodbury City ufCottage Grove City of Eagan Tree Preservation Ordinance Comparison Chart Tree preservation required for Allowed removal before single family replacement/mitigation home? 30% _ Depends nnLand Lbe^ Depends nnLand Use ^ City ofSt. Louis Park C% City dLake City Q% City of Medina Depends on Lot Size No Yes Notes: a: See Exhibit b:See Exhibit B c Greater replacement required for specimen trees d:See Exhibit [ eSee Exhibit D Tree Inventory required? Yes nrTree Inventory Sampling Yes Yes orTree Inventory Sampling Yes Yes No Yes Tree Tree Replacement Classification Schedule/Formula � Diameter Inches Replaced Common: 1/4rep|aced Coniferous: 112 replaced Standard Deciduous: 1/Zreplaced Standard Standard Standard Standard None Deciduous and Coniferous' | Diameter Inches Rao|aced Common: l/Qreplaced Coniferous: l/4replaced Deciduous: 112,ep|aced See Cottage Grove Tree replacement fulfills landscaping requirements? Special protections for Specimen Trees? Residential., No Commercial: Yes Yes Residential: No Commercial; Yes Yes No No- See Eagan Schedule' No Noc See St. Louis Park 5chedu|e° No Maintain existing density o(trees upLulV trees/acre No l:1caliper inch replacement No No No f:Tree removal permit required, but noreplacement necessary Q:See Exhibit E h: See Exhibit F i: Does not separate hardwood and softwood deciduous trees Exhibit A: Cottage Grove Allowed Tree Removal a. Single lot development: (11 Single unit residential. twenty percent (20%). (2) Commercial. industrial. institutional and multi -unit residentia(, thirty percent (30%). b. Single phase, multi -lot development: (1 1 Single unit residential. forty percent (4n). (2) Commercial, industrial, institutional and multi -unit residential, fifty percent (50%). c, Two-phase development: (1) Initial site development, tventy five percent (25%). (2) Individual lot development: (A) Single unit residential, tventy percent (20`)/0). (B) Commercial, industrial, institutional and multi -unit residential. thirty percent (30%), Exhibit B: Cottage Grove Tree Replacement Schedule Size Of Qualifying Tree Damaged Or Destroyed Category A Coniferous: Category B Catenory C 12 to 24 feet high - - - - - - 124 feet or higher 2 a i 4 - 16 HarcMood deciduous; -,' 16 to less than 2C inches dbh 2010 less than 30 inches dbh 2 Soft ;pod deciduous :- 112 to 24 incnes dbh Greater than 24 inches dbh i 2 Specimen tree 1 3 1 Woodland; 14 4 18 2 18 112 Pei 1.000 square feel 1 5 3 ; 6 Replacement Tree 1 Cateaory A Cateaory B Deciduous No less than 4 inches Coniferous r No less than 12 feet Catenary C No less than 2.5 No less than 1.5 inches inches No less than 6 feet No less than 4 feet Exhibit C: City of Eagan Allowed Tree Removal Allowanle tree removal. Tree re;noval Wir.w,:rin(:•.e Specimen tree, significant tree. and significcmt 'woodland removal shall be in accordance with the city -approved tree preservation plan an:: in no case, shall the amount cif removal exceed the, following percentages: ct I single lot development_ 1 ) Single -unit residential. 20 percen (1on-intercial and flltiltiUnit reSidOritial. -130 pereerit. cleve,lopment. 1- I ) Single-phase development process. Single unit residential. 40 percent. thbi Commercial and multiunit residential, 47.5 percent. 1.7T,o-i:hae development. Initial site development, 25 percent. (hh1 Individual lot development. b. Single unit residential 20 perceni Commercial or imilti-unit residential. 30 percent. Exhibit D: City of Eagan Tree Replacement Schedule Tree replacement. Scitecit, 110,",13ER OF REPL-J: U.\ Ei IT TREES Size of Tree Ciama(„riecl or Destroyed CFitegory Category e Categor",i C Conifel'OUS, 12 to 2-1 feet high 1 Coniferous, 2-1 feet or higher 2 1 Hard.'ood dcidous � o 20 inclie.s charneter 1 2 Hrd',Doc! deciduous, 21 to 30 inches_ diameter 2 4 Soft' 'o-cicl deciduous. 12 to 24 inches diameter 1 2 Soft iood deciduoLis. greater '..han 2-4 inches 2 diameter Specimen tree 3 SiZe of replacement tree;,3. ta; Category A trees shall be. no less thin the follo‘,A,:ing sizes: th Deciduous trees. not less than four inches in diameter. Coniferous trees, not less than 12 feet in height. Category B trees shall be, no I le,SS than the. following sizes. Deciduous trei05. not iess than and one-half inches in diamete 2. Coniferous trees. not le35 than six feet in height. Category C trees shall he no less than the following sizes: Deciduous trees. not ieSS then one and one-half inories in diameter. Coniferous trees. not Is than four feel in height. Exhibit E: City of St. Louis Park Tree Replacement Schedule C_ Approval of a permit for the removal of any significant tree or for land alteration \\filch results in tree destruction shall be subject to and conditioned upon the owner or developer replacing the loss or reasonably anticipated loss of all live sipuficant trees. The amount of trees to be provided in replacement shall be determined by the following formula: ((A L) Total diameter inches of signal alteration or removal, 'ees los result of li - Total diameter niche', of 1Qnificant trees 'situated on the a Tree replacement constant ( .:1). Replacement trees (number of caliper inches). Exhibit F: City of Medina Allowed Tree Removal Subd. b. Alloys rd Tree Removal, I a Th1(1110'.'j :-•,inount SiiitiaiuIreei, may be remo-,-ed from ie and l`t1)1lCe111:II 'ills -ill not be. required. Initial Site Development Total poi:lefty aie,a included in the use applation of impfoveinenii: ac,re 1 1-5,0 ,-icfes. 5.1-10,1) Allowed pei,..,.'ent of Signifi,-,ant Tree,: that may be ieinoved 1 1 5 1 ,3,;res I c Activities other than ltiiiial She Development Lot Size, 0,1-1 if.) a,:re 1 1-5.0 5,1- 10.0 a c, fe Allowed ..ief.:ent of Si!znific,...-ilit Tret t1i,3t may be: removed G ilD) For at:tivities that include the Subdivision of property of dedic;a IOU Of Of private ii?lit-of-v\-ay the ,:illowed number of S.ic-nifkant Ifee,, mx,,- be removed fOrJlliti1 Site Development 1ia1I be based oii the, lot size prior to Subdivii.ion. After the pfoperry i ubdivided, the allowed nun-ih.er of Sr:rnificant Iie that n-L-ly be. removed i„hall be. based on the individual lot within the Subdivii-ion. KE MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION AGENDA ITEM: Zoning Text Amendment — Off -Street Parking and Loading SUBMITTED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner THROUGH: Dean Zuleger, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: Planning Conunission Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: 04/16/2013 15 Introduction of Item................. ........ ........... .............. .......... ..... .......... ...... Staff . Staff Questions from Council to ..... ........... ........... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate. ............ ..... .......... .............. ....... Mayor Facilitates Call for ..... ..... ............... Mayor & City Council ....... . ......... Mayor & City Council Action on Motion. ..... ........ ................. ..... ....... ...... . ............ ............ Mayor Facilitates Report/Presentation ...... ...... SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is asked to consider a Zoning Text Amendment, establishing standards for off-street parking and loading for all use classifications in Lake Elmo. The existing provisions related to off-street parking only address parking requirements for a limited number of use classifications in four specific zoning districts. This Zoning Text Amendment is part of the ongoing effort to reorganize and improve the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of future severed growth. The Planning Commission recommends the Go, Council approve Ordinance 08-077 through the .Thllowing motion: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-077, establishing off-street parking and loading requirements for all use classification in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code" In addition, Staff recommends that the City Council approve Resolution No. 201 3-3 1, authorising summary publication of Ordinance 08-077, through the following motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-31, authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 08-077." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Staff is currently working on a large project aimed at incrementally reorganizing and improving the Lake Elmo Zoning Code in preparation of upcoming growth. This project began with the adoption of the urban residential and commercial zoning districts in August of 2012. As Staff has worked to improve the Zoning Code, existing ordinances have been evaluated in terms of effectiveness and organization. In this spirit, Staff evaluated the existing off-street parking regulations and found the standards to be incomplete and poorly organized. With the onset of future development, it is important to have clear and effective parking regulations, particularly for uses that have greater parking needs, such as conu-nercial and high density residential development. In order to organize the off-street parking requirements in a sensible manner, Staff is proposing to set parking levels based upon use classification as opposed to zoning district. Use classifications are land use types, such as single family detached or restaurant, and can be found in §154.012 of the Lake Elmo City Code. Therefore, these use classifications become the basis for the amount of off-street parking required in Lake Ehno, regardless of the zoning district. The Planning Commission reviewed the proposed Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance at a workshop meeting on March 25, 2013. At this meeting, the Planning Commission made some recommendations related to minor adjustment of the ordinance. Staff responded to this request by making minor refinements. After an initial review, the Planning Conunission held a public healing on the proposed ordinance on April 8, 2013. No one spoke in favor or against the ordinance at the public hearing. The Planning Commission unanimously recommended the propose ordinance for approval. The Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance is intended to establish parking requirements for all use classifications in Lake Elmo. This is a departure from the current approach of establishing parking requirements for a limited number of use classifications within 4 zoning districts: General Business, Highway Business, Convenience Business and Limited Business. Not only are these zoning districts obsolete with the recent amendments made to the Comprehensive Plan, but not all use classifications are addressed within these standards. The proposed Off -Street Parking and Loading Ordinance is intended to remedy these deficiencies. In addition to standards related to location, maintenance and design of parking areas, the proposed parking ordinance (§154.210) establishes dimensional standards for all parking types in Table 5-1. These dimensional standards address parallel parking, angled (45) parking, 60parking and head -in (90) parking. Moving forward, the ordinance establishes quantifiable parking requirements in Table 5-2. Next, the ordinance also includes provisions for off-street loading (§154.211). The Zoning Code does have existing provisions related to off-street loading, but does not include a requirement related to the number of loading births per the size of the facility. This ordinance remedies this gap by including a requirement pertaining to the number of loading birth, which is important in larger facilities that could be located in the Commercial (C) or Business Park (BP) districts. Finally, Staff is proposing to organize these standards under Article 5, General Regulations. These are zoning requirements that apply to land use across all zoning districts. As part of this effort, Staff suggests striking all of the existing language pertaining to off-street parking and loading, outlined in Ordinance 08-077. RECOMMENDATION: The Planning COMilliSSi017 recommends the City Council approve Ordinance 08-077 through the following motion: "Move to approve Ordinance 08-077, establishing off-street parking and loading requirements for all use classification in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code" In addition, Staff recommends that the Ci4, Council approve Resolution No, 2013-31, authorifing summary publication of Ordinance 08-077, through the 16110-wing motion: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-31, authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 08-077. " ATTACHMENT(S1: 1. Ordinance 08-077 2. Resolution No. 2013-31 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA ORDINANCE NO. 08-077 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE LAKE ELMO CITY CODE OF ORDINANCES BY ADOPTING NEW OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING REGULATIONS FOR ALL USE CLASSIFICATIONS IN THE LAKE ELMO ZONING CODE SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by repealing City Code Sections 154.095 through 154.096 in their entirety. SECTION 2. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 051 by removing the following language: Off -Street Parking: (Also See 55 154.095 and 154.096) The off-street parking requirements for properties located in the Old Village District and south of Minnesota Highway 5 may be waived by the Zoning Administrator upon demonstration that there are no suitable locations to provide off-street parking in a manner that complies with requirements found below and in 55 154.095 and 154.096. Eating and Drinking Places One space for every 2 seats and 1 space for every 2 employees on the average maximum shift Automobile Service Stations Retail Stores or Centers Motels and Hotels Medical and DentalClinics Three spaces for each enclosed bay plus 1 space for each day shift employee plus a minimum of 2 spaces for service vehicles and 1 additional space for each service vehicle over 2 in number Eleven spaces for the first 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction of floor area: 8 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 1,000 square feet, but not exceeding 15,000 square feet; 6 spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 15,000 square feet of gross floor area exceeding 30,000 square feet. One space for each unit plus 1 space for each employee on any 1 shift. Four spaces for each doctor or dentist, plus 1 space for every employee or 1 for each 150 square feet of gross floor area, whichever requirement is greater. Other Commercial Uses (excluding One space for each 200 square feet of oss floor area. wholesale) SECTION 3. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 055 by removing the following language: Off -Street Parking (a(so see S 154.095) Eating and drinking places: one space for every 2 seats, and 1 space for every 2 employees on the average maximum shift. (Parking spaces for "drive- in" customers shall not be credited as a part of the off-street parking area needed to serve the sales operation conducted within the buildings.) Automobile service stations: three spaces for each enclosed bay plus 1 space for each day shift employee plus a minimum of 2 spaces for service vehicles and 1 additional space for each service vehicle over 2 in number Motel and hotels: 1 space for each unit plus 1 space for each employee on any 1 shift SECTION 4. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 056 by removing the following language: Off -Street Parking Retail Stores or Centers: Eleven spaces for the first 1,000 square feet of gross floor area or fraction of gross floor area; Eight spaces for each 1,000 square feet of gross floor area in excess of 1,000 square feet Other Commercial Uses, excluding Wholesale: One space for each 200 square feet of gross floor area SECTION 5. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code; Section 057 by removing the following language: 2 Off -Street Parking (Also see 5 154.095) SECTION 6. The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo hereby amends Title XV: Land Usage; Chapter 154: Zoning Code, by adding the following language: ARTICLE 5 GENERAL REGULATIONS 5154.200 Purpose 5154.201 Applicability 5154.202 Permits Required 5154.203 Essential Services 5154.210 Dff'StreetParking 5154.211 Off -Street Loading § 154'200 Purpose The purpose o/this Article is to establish regulations for activities that may occur in many zoning districts orinassociation with avariety ofland uses, including parking, signage, and activities within yards, to promote the orderly development oruse of land and minimize conflicts among land uses. §154.3U1 Applicability The provisions ofthis Article shalt beapplied to all zoning districts and shalt be in addition to the requirements in any specific zoning district. 4 permit shalt not beissued unless all applicable general regulations are met. §154.2O2 Permits Required. Permits are required for all changes in use and all development activities, with the exception of signs, in compliance with the standards ofArticle 3, Administration. Signs shalt require sign permit in compliance with Section 151.115and Article 3. S154.2O3 Essential Services Essential services as defined by this Ordinance are permitted in any district, provided that asite plan for any new or expanded service facility is filed with the Planning Department. The City Council may require site plan review oflarge facilities, upon the recommendation of the Planning Director. § 154'210 Off -Street Parking A. Puqnmoc. The intent ufthis section is to prevent oralleviate congestion and promote the public safety and welfare by establishing minimum requirements for off-street parking, and requiring that parking areas are located and constructed in a manner that provides for optimum visibility tovehicles entering and exiting said parking area, accessibility and safety. It is the responsibility of property owners to provide adequate parking to meet their specific needs. B. Applicability. Off-street parking in accordance with this section shalt be provided for at( new uses and all expansions ofexisting uses in all districts. Parking requirements may be waived in the Village Mixed -Use District (VMX). recognizing the availability ofon-street and shared parking facilities. C. Location. All required off-street parking facilities shalt belocated outside ofany street hght' of -way, and as follows: 1. Spaces accessory to one- and two-family dwellings shalt be located on the same tot as the principal use served. Spaces within garages are counted toward the required number of spaces. 2. Spaces accessory Uo muttipie'famiiydw/eihngs and nonresidential uses shalt be located on the same tot as the principal use served or within four hundred (408) feet of the main entrance tothe principal building served. 3 Off-street parking located elsewhere than on the tot where the p/incipa| use being served is located shall be under the same ownership and contro|, either by deed o/ long-term [ease, as the principal use. The owner ofthe principal use must file a recordable document with the City requiring permanent provision of off-street parking during the existence of the principal use. 4. Off-street surface parking areas containing more than four parking spaces shalt be located a minimum of twenty (ZO) feet from the boundary of any adjacent tot zoned or used for residential purposes, with the exception nflots zoned Village Mixed -Use (VMX). 5. Other Parking in Residential Areas. Parking in residential areas (off-street and on -street) shalt be Limited to the use ofthe residents ofthose homes and their guests 6. D/f'St/eetPork/ng /n Commercial Areas. Off-street surface parking areas in commercial districts shalt be located in a manner consistent with the setback requirements in §154.552. 7. Required off-street parking spaces shalt not be utilized for open storage n/goods orfor the storage ofvehicles which are inoperable orfor sate or rent. D. Parking Area Design and Maintenance. 1. Access to Parking Spaces. Each required off-street parking space shalt open directly to an aisle ordriveway ofsuch width and design as to provide safe and efficient means of vehicular access to the parking space, as shown in Table 5'1' Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions, except where accessory to residential uses ofup to four (4) units. Z. Maneuvering Area. All parking areas except those serving one and two family dwellings on Local streets shalt bedesigned sothat cars shall not be required to back into the street. If deemed necessary for traffic safety, turn -around areas may be required. 3. Surfacing and Drainage. All off-street parking areas shall bosurfaced asfollows: a. Single-family and two-family dwellings shall provide durable surface with suitable drainage. b. In all residendai, commercial and mixed use districts, all areas intended to he utilized for parking space for five (5) or more vehicles and associated driveways shall be paved with u durable surface including, but not limited to, hot asphalt, bituminous or concrete. c. In industrial districts, aKareas intended to be utilized for parking space and driveways shalt besurfaced with materials suitable hocontrol dust and drainage. Plans for surfacing and drainage for nonresidential uses shall be submitted for review and the final plan shall bcsubject towritten approval. d. Storage areas for heavy construction equipment that would damage the pavement may be exempt from the paving and surfacing requirement with an acceptable surface approved bythe City Engineer. e. Farm dwellings and farm operations are exempt from the paving requirement. f. City parks shalt be exempt from the parking requirement ifapproved by the City 4. Marking of Parking Spaces. All parking areas containing five (5) or more spaces or 4 containing angled parking shall bemarked with painted lines at least four (4)inches wide. Such markings shalt bemaintained inackeadykegbbccnndition. 5. Curbing. All open off-street parking areas designed tohave head -in parking along the property tine shall provide a bumper curb not less than five (5) feet from the side property line ora barrier ofnormal bumper height not less than three (]) feet from the side property line. 6. Landscaping and Screening. Parking areas shall be screened and landscaped as provided in Article 6'Section 154.I58. 7. General Maintenance. Parking areas and driveways shall be kept free of dirt, dust, debris and waste. In winter months, required parking areas shall be cleared ofsnow and ice within oreasonable time. 8. Accessible Parking. Accessible parking spaces for the disabled shalt be provided as required bythe International Building Code. E. Dimensions. The minimum dimensions for required parking spaces are asshown inTable 5'1' Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions and Figure 5'1, Minimum Parking Dimensions Diagram. Tabie5'1; Minimum Parking Space and Aisle Dimensions Angle (A) Width (D)^ 0(ParaUel) 45�r' 6O 901, p' 9' 9. 9' Curb Length Stall Depth 1 Way Aisle 3'VYayAide ZZ` 816" 14' IZ' 12' 18'011 14' II' 910" 19'10" 18' ZZ' 8'6" 18' ZO' 22` a For parking areas containing more than ten (10) parking spaces, compact spaces may account for uptotwenty percent (Z0%)ofthe total parking area required. They may be reduced in size to a width of eight (8) feet and m stall depth of twelve percent (12%) Less than (D) above, and must begrouped and signed appropriately uParkingspacesthatuseanappvophateiysizedcurboverhongoverniandscapedisiandor buffer may be reduced in depth by one and one-half feet (1' 6"). A concrete curb or other means shalt beprovided to prevent parked vehicles from damaging plant materials. Figure 5-1: Minimum Parking Dimensions Diagram D | F. Parking Requ/mments, Accessory, off-street parking shall beprovided msspecified ioTable 5- 2, Specific Minimum Off-street Parking Requirements, except asotherwise specified inthis section. 1. In addition to the requirements in Table 5'2, one (1) parking space shalt be provided for each commercial vehicle orvehicle necessary for the operation of the use that is maintained on the premises. Z. Parking spaces for uses with multiple components, such as hotels with dining and conference facilities, shall be based on the sum of the parking requirements ofthe separate components, Shared parking standards may beused where applicable. 3. Proof ofparking. The Planning Commission may allow parking requirements for n particular use to be relaxed orlessened in response tnan expected demand that is tower than the required standard inthis section, provided that one ofthe following conditions exists: a. Sufficient open area is set aside on the parcel to meet the required standard, if determined to benecessary mta Later date. b. If parking wilt be needed less than twenty-five (25%) of the time during typical hours of use, on -street parking accessible by sidewalk within two blocks of the site may be used in Lieu ufrequired off-street parking. 4. Where o parking study is required, a qualified transportation engineer ortransportation planner shall perform the study. The study shall contain information nnthe anticipated number o/employees, customers, visitors, clients, shifts, events' nrdeliveries tothe use, and may refer toother studies orsimilar situations elsewhere. G. Shared Parking. Joint use of required parking spaces is encouraged where two or more uses on the same oradjacent sites are able to share the same parking spaces because their parking demands occur otdifferent times. The applicant(s) must submit on analysis showing that peak parking times ofthe uses will occur atdifferent times and the parking area wilt be adequate for both uses. 4 iegaiinstrument such as an easement nrdeed restriction that guarantees access tothe parking for both uses shalt be submitted. H. Truck parking /n residential areas. No commercially licensed trailer shall be parked or stored in residential district except when Loading, unloading orrendering aservice. Recreation vehicles and pickups are not restricted bythe terms of this provision. Table 5'2. Specific Minimum Off -Street Parking Requirements Use Residential Uses Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Household Living . ! Single-family detached dwelling Two-family dwelling Single-family attached dwelling Multifamily dwelling � Zspaces per dwelling unit ! 1 space per 1'bedroom unit 2 spaces per 2-bedroom or larger unit . No fee shalt be charged for Single-family attached dwellings ' shall provide anadditional 10&of � parking spaces for visitor parking ! � i Multifamily dwellings shall also provide 1 visitor space per 4 units required spaces Use Minimum Parking Requirement Senior (elderly) housing 1 space per dwelling unit |fsenior housing may be . ! converted to general housing, in the future, proof of � additional parking shalt be required Secondary dwelling Live -work unit 1 space per secondary dwelling | ' unit � 2 spaces per dwelling unit Mobile home park 2 spaces per dwelling unit Group Living 6-- rou- - d-( facility, halfway house, congregate housing Semi -transient accommodations 9ubUcand C�icUses Cemetery | College oruniversity, other . adult learning center ' __.. Community services � | Day care center (see under Accessory Uses for Family day care) School, public or private Public assembly .--t - - � 4k�astonr��the rcquired � spaces shall beaccessible for ' client parking 1 space per employee onthe { largest shift plus 1 visitor space for every 4 residents based on capacity | 1 space per bedroom, plus one space for each fu\bimcstmffequivalent � As determined bythe Planning Director ' T^'- UetenninedbythePbnning / Director based on parking ' -----]]------th Parking -r! nnngcquo|to nn�upercenco/ e capacity ofpersons oros � determined by � ' | Director based nn parking study | 1 �pac�perempu�yeeonlargest shift plus 1 space per 7 students based oncapacity; or space per 1Ostudents ifnn off-street drop- off and pick-up space is provided 1 space per staff member plus 1 space per 5students oflegal driving age based nndesign capacity Parking study required Parking study required Existing schools not meeting this standard may berequired todevelop aparking management plan, but shalt ! not berequired toadd the | minimum number ofspaces space per each 4 seats based on . design capacity 7 Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Religious institution, place of 1 space per each 6seats or10feet ' worship ofpews inthe main assembly hall ` . � Services uusnesscencer 'to nxn--Iuikennel -c1. omm .'`- stable -- mmunicatinnseni s------- Finanda\i- tution Funeral home Transient Accommodations, Lodging Total ofparking requirements for / individual uses, excepting any that . � meet the shared parking i requirements inSection 154.210.G / ^-------'- ----� l space per employee onthe ' largest shift plus 1 space per animals ! i 1 space per 4UOsquare feet of i i gross floor area, plus l space per � company vehicle stored onthe site �11��`�11-1- ���. 1 space per staff member plus 1 ! space per 5students oflegal ' � driving age based ondesign � i capacity � 1 space per 100 square feet _ of_� ' usable floor area . 1 space per 10Osquare feet u/ -� floor area in the main assembly | ! room plus one space per staff i member ' � . . 1 space per guest room, plus | additional space for meeting or restaurant facilities -___ -_-_'____-_'__-___'-__-� �edicai_'_fuchtks � � �poces_per meU_caipro�es�onai, . or 1 space per ZOOsquare feet uf ' � | / grossfloor area - - --------�-a feet of - �m��Npm����(c��, ��perj���� lodges, etc.) � grossfloor area � '- -- - --- ---- Nursing and personal care 1 space for each 4beds, plus space per employee on the largest| ' work shift � - n-------'------------' �----'-r'---'-'- -� �xas i ��e pe/'mmsquare feet m . � grossf�orarea o! -`----------- � - - -------''-' penna�xennccy � 1 space of � gross floor area 8 Existing institutions not meeting this standard may be required k/develop aparking managementplan, but shall not be required [oadd the minimum number ofspaces Meeting and restaurant facilities may require additional parking, based on square footage of each use as defined in this table. Use Minimum Parking Requirement Repair and maintenance shop � 1space per 400 square feet of ' gross floor area Self-service storage facility —'-�--1 space -----e300 --' square feet of - office or sales area Trade shop Transportation services Veterina se ice ' Thcaproninfrnntof- ---- ' storage units shall be wide enough for two cars to pass � 1 space per ]OOsquare feet of office orsales area, plus space �per]'0VOsquare feet ofstorage ' area ''---'---- '-i i 1 space per 3OOsquare feet of . | office orsales area, plus 1 space ' / per vehicle keotnnprembes � - | � ] spaces per veterinarian, or 1 ! i space per IUOsquare feet ofgross � floor area Food Services _ _........... ........ _ Drinking and Entertainment � l space per customer seats or each 100sq. ft. ofinterior space / i (the greater), plus 1 space per 2D0 i sq. /t. exterior seating Drive-in -—�'!- ----------------'---'� hvc'/o R*s�auranL--- , Fas�'Food -! 1 'space per 3 -cus�omer-��a�� or - Restaurant, Standard Restaurant' each 100 sq. ft. of interior space ! � (the greater), plus 1 space per ZUO � ! sq. ft. exterior seating area. Drive' thvoughsshaKprnvdequeuing space for otleast 3vehicles in � advance of the menu board and 3 � vehiciesbetvveenthcmenuboan1 . / � and pick-up window / Sales ofMercha��� Garden�ent�r.Buik�no��po '/q�ft. of ----'g--s � Saks � floor area plus 1 space per 2,000 . Furniture and Appliance Sates General 'Retail Shopping Center � sq. ft. ofoutside sales ordisplay � area x -'------ - / paceper 800 sq. ft . of groo floor area 1 space per 25Osq. ft. ofgross / floor area � - 1 space per Z50sq. ft. of gross � floor area � ! 9 Includes any retail uses not specifically Listed in this table Shared parking provisions (Section 154.210.G. of this Article) are encouraged tobe Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes --- ' 1 space per4OO sq. ft. sales area | Spaces need not be paved, b�� Wayside Stand shall beadequately separated ' hn ' 1 space per I5Osq. ft. of indoor � sales area plus 1 space per 2,UDU ' square feet of storage area Amtommbibe8/ehiou|arWyeu _____ __________ �uLomobiieNs1ntenonce Services' Commercial Vehicle � Repair, Gas Station Automobile Parts/Supply Automobile Rental Car Wash | � -------.... ~ Outdoor Recreation Uses Campgrounds and Traftering Golf Course '- -------'-- Manna uum000rEn,encuinment 1 space per Z50sq. ft. of gross floor area used for sates or customer service plus Ispaces per service bay --- ---------- ---'-- | �paccper�zosq. rc cx mmoor sates area plus 1 space per 2.00O squarefeet ofstoragearea ----'--1�---- --11 -- / npaceper Jusg. n. - or - gro-so floor area plus adequate storage space for rental vehicles maintained on site � �� ����`������ 1.5spac11 esperbay' pius4�tacking spaces per bay, plus 1 space per employee on the largest shift, ---'-- -- / space per Z5osq. ��. ofin000� �and screened from the street � and adjacent properties, as determined bythe Planning Director ! Service bay shall not be � � counted as aparking space ! | sates area plus 1 space per Z,OO8 | ! sq. ft. nfoutside sates nrdisplay � area and 1 space per Z'00Osquare ! ! feet nfstorage area ` � 1 space per site, plus spaces / required for other uses `- spac es s ----- --'---�`-'- - --- ----- - ' i cesper hole plus aooinona l ! space for meeting o,restaurant | / facilities � ' As determined by the Planning Parking study may be required | Director / for large or multiple -use � ! facilities As determined �'----' by the Planning -r------ ------- � Director � 10 Use Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Outdoor Recreation Facility 1space per ] persons based on . Parking study may berequired � maximum occupancy load, plus 1 for Large or muhip|e'use � space per employee onthe largest ! facilities ' shift orasdetermined by parking ' � study—''--- '------------- Parks and Open Areas No requirement � _____�__ Recreation R�cre�on As determined bythe Planning Parking study may berequ/red Director Swimming pool 1 space per 10square feet of pool . area Indoor Recreation/Entertainment �_--____-____' 4du�Estmhbshment l space per Z50sq. ft. of gross � floor area |rc uo--'-eti' Facility Indoor Recreation ' 1 space per Z5Osquare feet floor / . area plus 2spaces per tennis or | ' racquet games court and 1 space | i per 15Osquare feet ufpool area Bowling '�'-__- '�- a�z ueys� spaces per lane ' Other facilities: 1 space per ] � persons based on maximum capacity Agricultural and Related Uses Agricultural Production and No requirement � Services Agricultural Support 1 space per ]DOsq. ft, of indoor � ! sales oroffice area plus 1 space . ' per 1.000 sq. ft. of outside sales or � ' display area and 1 space per Z OOO � ' �square feet of storage area Forestry Operations As determined by the Planning / � Director . Production, Processing and Storage ' Non -production industrial 1 space per 1,000 sq. ft. gross Light Industrial Heavy Industrial floor area upto2O,OOOsq. ft. plus ! 1 space per I,0OOsq. ft. in excess of2O`000sq. ft., or per 5 regular employees, whichever is greater. 11 Additional parking may also be required for office or retail space' osspecified inthis table Includes other industrial uses largely carried nninenclosed buildings and not individually uroaocas tin gorCom Tower [soenti t-e-�- ' - LocaiTrmndL, Railroad Transportation Accessory Uses An _ Ho --- 0 11 c I cu I pa I tio -- Minimum Parking Requirement Notes Motor freight and warehousing 1 space per 300 sq. ft. of office or | sates area, plus 1 space per ].8OO � ! � sq. ft. ofstoragearea � _ � Zspaces per 3employees onthe / Includes other industrial uses largest shift, based on maximum largely carried on outdoors i ! Landfill, Resource Extraction, Sak/age/Recyciab(e[enter � planned employment � Utilities, Transportation and Communications -r transportation ---------'--`---------�------ --/ | Director unication No ---------�-emont---' � — AadeterminedbydieP|anniny � . Director � Zspaces per 3employees onthe largest shift, based on maximum � planned employment | . - requirement No requirement unless �'---- - ---- specified in � Conditional i . ' Bed and breakfast Family Day Care, Group Family � Day Care � Ken----i- --- - -- ' Private; Stable, Pr'__ . Interim Uses interim Use l space per guest room inaddition to dwelling unit requirements 1 space per employee not residing onthe premises plus one drop-off space No requirement � 4adetermined bythe Planning � i Director | §154.211 Off -Street Loading Areas. Off-street loading space shalt be provided in all districts for any nonresidential use which wilt involve the receipt or distribution of materials o/ merchandise by trucks or similar vehicles and has a gross floor area offive thousand (5,000) square feet o/more, in accordance with the fni(awingstandards. Off-street loading area requirements may be waived in the Village Mixed -Use District (VMX). A. Number, For facilities with less than twenty thousand (ZO,OOO)square feet gross floor area, a designated loading zone may be provided on site, rather than constructing n loading berth. For facilities with twenty thousand (ZO,OUU) square feet gross floor area or greater, one (1) off- street Loading berth shall be provided for every thirty thousand (30'000) square feet gross floor area or fraction thereof. 12 B. Location. All required loading berths shall be off-street. 4 loading berth shall be located at least twenty-five (25) feet from the intersection of two street rights -of -way and at [east fifty (60) feet from o residential district unless within a building. Loading berths shall not occupy the required front yard setback. C. Size. Unless otherwise specified inthis chapter, a required loading berth shalt benot less than twelve (12) feet in width, fifty (50) feet in length and fourteen (14) feet in height, exclusive of aisle and maneuvering space. D. Access. Each required loading berth shall be located with appropriate means ofvehicle access to street or public alley in a manner which wilt [east interfere with traffic. Driveway design is specified in Section 154.209 ofthis Article. E. Surfacing. Alt loading berths and access ways shall be improved with a durable material to control the dust and drainage. F. Accessory use. Any space allocated as a loading berth or maneuvering area in accordance with this Section shall not beused for the storage ofgoods, inoperable vehicles or required off- street parking. SECTION 7. Effective Date. This ordinance shall become effective immediately upon adoption and publication in the official newspaper of the City of Lake Elmo. SECTION 8. Adoption Date. This Ordinance 08'077 was adopted on this sixteenth day of April 2013, by a vote of Ayesand Nays. LAKE ELMOCITY COUNCIL ' Mike Pearson, Mayor Adam Be[, City Clerk This Ordinance 08-077 was published on the day of 2013. 13 CITY OF LAKE ELMO COUNTY OF WASHINGTON STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-031 RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING PUBLICATION OF ORDINANCE 08-077 BY TITLE AND SUMMARY WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-077, an ordinance to the City's regulations pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading; and WHEREAS, the ordinance is lengthy; and WHEREAS, Minnesota Statutes, section 412.191, subd. 4, allows publication by title and summary in the case of lengthy ordinances or those containing charts or maps; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that the following summary would clearly inform the public of the intent and effect of the ordinance. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo, that the City Clerk shall cause the following summary of Ordinance No. 08-077 to be published in the official newspaper in lieu of the entire ordinance: Public Notice The City Council of the City of Lake Elmo has adopted Ordinance No. 08-077, which replaces the current sections of the City Code pertaining to Off -Street Parking and Loading. The revised ordinance includes the following revisions from the previous ordinance: The inclusion of new parking standards related to location, design and maintenance of parking areas; The incorporation of new dimensional standards for different parking types or designs; Establishment of required parking quantities for all use classifications in the Lake Elmo Zoning Code; and • Establishment of a required number of loading births per the square footage of a facility. The full text of Ordinance No. 08-077 is available for inspection at Lake Elmo city hall during reLu1ar business hours. Resolution No. 2013-31 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo that the City Administrator keep a copy of the ordinance at City Hall for public inspection and that a full copy of the ordinance be placed in a public location within the City. Dated: April 16, 201 CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson Mayor (Seal) ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk The motion for the adoption of the foregoing resolution was duly seconded by member and upon vote being taken thereon, the following, voted in favor thereof: and the following voted against same: Whereupon said resolution was declared duly passed and adopted. Resolution No. 2013-31 TI Ir. CITY' )F, .6,,,,meArr,001,017corrn AGENDA ITEM: SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: MAYOR AND COUNCIL COMMUNICATION Keats M SA Street and Trunk a e Award Contract Jack Griffin, City Engineer Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator Adam Bell, City Clerk Cathy Bendel, Finance Director DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: RESOLUTION 04/16/2013 16 ain Improvements — Accept Bids and SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item.. ..... ......... ....... ...... . ...... Engineer - Report/Presentation City Engineer - Questions from Council to Staff .............. ....... ..... ............ ..... ....... Mayor Facilitates Public Input. if Appropriate. ..... ..... ...... .......... ........... Mayor Facilitates - Call for Motion ..................... ...... ..... ........ ...... ..... ...................Mayor & City Council Discussion ..... ............. ..... .................. ........ ........... . ...... ............ Mayor & City Council Action on ....... ... ..... ..... ....... Mayor Facilitates SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The city council is respectfully requested to consider accepting contractor bids as presented and awarding a contract for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-32, Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifskj' and Sons, Inc., in the amount 0.1..51,606,833.47, for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Waterman' Inzprovements." BACKGROUND AND STAFF REPORT: Bids were received, publicly opened, and read aloud on April 9, 2013. The city engineer has prepared and attached the Tabulation of Bids and a Letter of Recommendation for the award of the contract. The City received eight (8) bids for this project, with T.A. Schifsky and Sons. Inc, providing the lowest base bid in the amount of 51,606,833.47 for the 12-inch diameter Trunk Watermain option. The Engineer's post -design construction cost estimate for the project was $1,848,435.25. The project remains within the budget amounts established with the Feasibility Report. T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc. is a knowm contractor having successfully completed previous projects in the city. The city engineer is therefore recommending that the Council award the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., for the 12-inch diameter trunk watermain as outlined in the attached letter. Hydraulic analysis performed by AE2S in 2012 verified that the 12-inch diameter watennain meets the projected hydraulic requirements for the water system and results in a savings of $171,960,40; the additional costs needed to install a 16-inch diameter trunk watermain. The City Council approved the Plans and Specifications for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watennain Improvements on March 5, 2013, and authorized staff to advertise the Project for bids. The Project was advertised on QuestCDN.com, Finance and Commerce, and in the Oakdale -Lake Elmo Review in accordance with the Minnesota Competitive Bidding requirements. The improvements include: The street reconstruction of Keats Avenue North as an Urhan Section Road meeting, state aid standards at 32 feet from back of curb to back of curb with concrete curb and gutter. The installation of a 12-inch diameter Trunk Watennain pipe connecting the existing watermain lines in the Tapestry development and Rock Point Church. Water quality improvements consisting of six shallow infiltration basins located within the existing road right-of-way to address VBWD permit requirements. FUNDING: This project will be partially financed through special assessments. For the Street Improvements of Keats Avenue North, the project can be primarily funded using the city's municipal state aid construction funds. In addition, there are 22 properties that are proposed to be specially,' assessed with an estimated unit assessment amount of $3,400. The City cost share for use of state aid funds is therefore $1,175,200. The trunk watermain improvement project is being installed as a part of the community wide integrated water systetn. Therefore, the watermain extension project will be primarily funded using the city's $1.0 million DEED water system grant with matching funds from the city's Water Enterprise Fund. These funds must be expended prior to December 31, 2014. Similar to a collector street improvement project, a local benefit will be realized by the properties adjacent to the trunk watermain line. Council has directed that a water lateral benefit assessment be levied in the amount of $2,900 to those 22 properties, with an additional water lateral benefit charge of $2,900 to be deferred until those properties connect to city water. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that the city council approve Resolution No. 2013-32, thereby acceptingacceptmg the bids and awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., in the amount of $1,606,833.47, for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watermain Improvements. The recommended motion for this action is as follows: "Move to approve Resolution No. 2013-32, Accepting the Bids and Awarding a Contract to T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., in the amount of $1,606,833.47, for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Waterman Improvements." ATTACHMENT(S): 1, Resolution No. 2013-32 2. Engineer's Letter of Recommendation and Tabulation of Bids 3. Project Schedule 2 CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY STATE OF MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2013-32 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE BIDS AND AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE KEATS MSA STREET AND TRUNK WATE IN IMPROVEMENTS WHEREAS, pursuant to an advertisement for bids for the Keats MSA Street and Trunk Watennain Improvements, bids were received, opened, and tabulated according to law, and bids were received complying with the advertisement; and WHEREAS, bids were tabulated, checked and summarized to verify that all requirements of the submittals were met; and WHEREAS, the project engineer reviewed the bids and has provided a letter recommending the award of the contract to the lowest responsible bidder, T.A. Schifsky and Sons, Inc., in the amount of S1,606,833.47. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, That the Mayor and City Clerk are hereby authorized and directed to enter into a Contract in the accordance with the above ordered Project, in the amount of the Contractor's lowest responsible bid, and according to the plans and specifications thereof approved by the City Council. . The City Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to return forthwith to all bidders the deposits made with their bids, except that the deposits of the successful bidder and the next two lowest bidders shall be retained until a contract has been signed. ADOPTED BY THE LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL ON THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL, 2013. CITY OF LAKE ELMO By: Mike Pearson (Seal.) Mayor ATTEST: Adam Bell City Clerk Resolution No. 2013-32 *44Cedar stme smm1am Saint Paul, wwenm om.292/wo ."""z"m April 11.2013 Mr. Chad |sakson. P.E. City ofLake Elmo 38O8Laverne Avenue North Lake Elmo, Minnesota 55042 Re: Keats Avenue NlSA Street and Trunk VVahannamImprovements City ofLake Elmo, Minnesota TKOA Project No. 15230,000 Dear Mr. |eaknon: A tabulation of the Bids received by the City for the above mentioned project on April 9, 2013 has been completed with the following results. A complete Tabulation of Bids is enclosed for your information, Contractor T.A.Schifaky&Sons, Inc. 8urohviUeConstruction, Inc, Hardhven.|nc. Redstone Construction, Inc, Miller Excavating, Inc, [NingarConstruction, Inc. Dresel Contracting, Inc. R� L Larson Excavating Inc. Base Bid Alternate No, 1 $1.008.833.47 $1.618.210.80 $1.632.817�68 $1.637.750i22 $1.649.52615 $1.727.08&59 $1.745.044,45 $171.060.40 $172.97150 $182.110.03 $1Q8.341f0 $147�608.25 $161'742�85 $181.341�00 Engineer's Estimate $1.848.43525 $144.107-00 Recommendation We recommend that you award the Contract to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, T.A. Schifahy 8 Sons. Inc, for their Base Bid excluding Alternate No, 1 nf$1.80O.83147. Please donot hesitate tocall mawith any questions orcomments you may have, ; David --&4Klocker, p,E. Project Engineer OMh/jao Enclosure An employee owned company promoting offirmative action and equal opportunitU TABULATION OF BIDS KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CI I Y OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9, 2013, AT 2:00 PM *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE ITEM MN/DOT UNIT TOTAL NO. NO, DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT [ DIVISION 1 - GENERAL 1 1 I 1 2021.501 :M013ILIZATION 1.00 LS $ 70,000.00 1 $ 70,000.00 $ 53,000,00 1 5 53,000_00 1 2 2101.502 ,CLEARING 1 TREE $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 400.00 1 $ 400.00 3 2101.507 GRUBBING 1 TREE $ 250,00 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 1 $ 100.00 1 4 2105.525 1TOPSOIL BORROW (CV) 2744 CY $ 14.09 $ 38,416.00 $ 5.00 $ 13,720,0D , ...... 5 2453.610 tEXPLORATORY DIGGING 8 HR $ 250.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 300.00 $ 2,400.00 , 6 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 1,00 LS $ 15,000.00 $ 15,000.00 $ 24,000.00 $ 24,000.00 7 2573.502 SILT FENCE 5880 LF $ 2.00 $ 11,760.00 $ 1.00 $ 5,880.00 8 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION 9 EA $ 150.00 $ 1,350.00 $ 60.00 $ 540.00 9 2573 602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2 EA $ 1,500.00 $ 3,000,00 $ 200.00 $ 400.00 10 2573.602 CULVERT PROTECTION 14 EA $ 100.00 1 $ 1,400.00 $ 75.00 $ 1,050.00 11 2575.505 SODDING (SALT RESISTANT) 213 SY $ 3.00 $ 639.00 7,00 $ 1,491.00 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT, 3 16465 SY $ 2.00 $ 32,930.00 1.03 $ 16,958.95 13 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 250 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 3) 3.36 AC $ 2,500,00 $ 8,400.00 525.00 f $ 14 2575.605 SEEDING(SEED MIXTURE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 4) 0.23 AC $ 3,500.00 $ 805,00 1,545.00 1 $ SUBTOTAL $ 186,200,00 1 $ DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN 1 1 2504,602 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 3,811.00 i $ 2 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING VVATERMAIN 2 EA $ 1,250.00 $ 2,500.00 $ 3,399.00 i $ 3 2504.602 16" HYDRANT 13 EA $ 3,000,00 $ 39,000.00 $ 3.244.50 . $ 4 2504.602 16" GATE VALVE & BOX 13 EA $ 1,250,00 $ 16,250.00 $ 1,236,00 $ 5 2504,602 8' GATE VAVLE & BOX 3 EA $ 1,850.00 $ 5,550.00 $ 1,627,40 $ 6 2504.602 12" GATE VAVLE & BOX 15 EA $ 2,800.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 2,811,90 $ 7 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 3 EA $ 150.00 $ 450.00 $ 278.10 $ 8 2504.602 1.5" CORPORATION STOP - 18 EA $ 200.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 607.70 $ 9 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP 1 EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 741,60 $ 10 2504.602 1CURB STOP AND BOX 3 j EA $ 150.00 $ 450.00 $ 566,50 $ 11 2504.602 1,5" CURB STOP AND BOX 18 1 EA $ 200.00 $ 3,600.00 $ 690 10 $ 12 2504.602 2" CURB STOP AND BOX '1 i EA $ 250.00 $ 250.00 $ 844.60 $ 13 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 135 LF $ 20.00 $ 2,700.00 $ 20,60 $ 14 2504.603 1.5" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICEPIPE 54B LF $ 22.00 $ 12,056.00 $ 23 69 $ 15 2504.603 2" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 45 i LF $ 28.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 30,90 $ 16 2504.603 6" DIP CL, 52 WATERMAIN 303 I LF $ 28.00 $ 8,484.00 $ 27.81 $ 17 2504.503 8" DIP CI_ 52 VVATERMAIN 52 LF $ 38.00 $ 1,976,00 $ 32.96 $ 18 2504.603 12" DIP CL, 52 WATERMAIN 5954 LF 5 55.00 $ 327,470.00 $ 43.00 $ 19 2504.603 12" HDPE DR. 11(DIP, BY HDD 2435 LF $ 58.00 $ 141,230,00 $ 58.00 1 $ 20 2504.608 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 4294 LEIS $ 5.50 $ 23.617.00 $ 4.74 1 $ 21 2564,551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER 2 EA $ 250.00 $ 500.00 $ 170.00 ! $ !SUBTOTAL $ 638,193.00 : $ I DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 1 2)04.501 ;REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS (ALI TYPES & SIZES) 1016 LF $ 9.00 $ 9,144.00 $ 7.00 ; $ 7,112,00 I 8.00 $ 8,128,00 2 2104,521 1SALVAGE CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 85 LF $ 7,00 $ 595.00 $ 13.00 i $ 1,105.00 , $ 15.00 $ 1,275.00 3 2501,515 i15" RCP FES VW TRASH GUARD 4 EA $ 450,00 $ 1,800.00 $ 1,163.90 $ 4,655_60 $ 850.00 $ 3.400.00 4 2501,515 18" RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD 4 EA $ 500.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,215.40 ; $ 4,861.60 I $ 940.00 $ 3,760.00 5 2501.515 !21" RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD 6 EA $ 650.00 $ 3,900.00 $ 1,421.40 1 $ 8,528.40 I $ 1,300,00 $ 7,800.00 6 2501.521 22" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE . 47 LE $ 32.00 $ 1,504.00 $ 50_00 1 $ 2,350.00 1 $ 90.50 $ 4,253.50 7 2501 521 _28" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEINER PIPE 49 LF $ 36.00 $ 1,764,00 $ 60,00 1 $ 2,940,00 I 1 $ 99.50 $ 4,875,50 8 2501.521 36" SPAN REP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 60 LF $ 40.00 ; $ 2,400.00 $ 82.40 1 $ 4,944.00 1 1 $ 105,50 $ 6,330.00 1 TKDA T.A, SCHIFSKY BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 $ 15.000.00 $ 15,000.00 1 1 $ 260.00 $ 260,00 1 $ 160.00 $ 160.00 $ 18.00 $ 49,392.00 1$ 250.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 1.60 $ 9,408.00 $ 125.00 $ 1,125.00 $ 900.00 $ 1,800.00 90.00 $ 1,260.00 5.50 $ 1,171.50 1,07 $ 17,617.55 1,764.00 $ 1,900.00 $ 6,384.00 355.35 $ 3,950.00 $ 908.50 122,059.30 $ 111,486.55 7,622.00 $ 4,000.00 $ 8,000.00 6,798,00 $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00 42,178,50 $ 4,000.00 $ 52,000.00 16,06B.00 $ 1,200.00 $ 15,600.00 4,882,20 1,700.00 $ 5,100.00 42,178.50 1 5 3,100.00 $ 46,500.00 834.30 $ 125_00 $ 375.00 10,938.60 $ 300,00 $ 5,400.00 741,60 ! $ 450.00 $ 450.00 1,699.50 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 12,421.80 $ 325.00 $ 5,850.00 844.60 $ 450.00 $ 450,00 2,781.00 $ 17.00 1 $ 2,295.00 12,982.12 $ 21.00 $ 11,508.00 1,390.50 $ 26.00 $ 1,170.00 8,426.43 $ 37.50 , $ 11,362,50 1,713.92 $ 42.00 $ 2,184.00 256,022,00 $ 43.00 $ 256,022,00 141,230.00 $ 51,00 $ 124,185.00 20,353.56 $ 4.75 $ 20,396.50 1, 340.00 $ 75.00 $ 150.00 592,447.13 $ 574,598,00 Page 1 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE Al[) PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENED; APRIL 9, 2013. AT 2;00 PM "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY 9 2501.525 22" SPAN RCP FES WI TRASH GUARD j 2 10 2501.525 28" SPAN RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD j 2 11 2501.525 36" SPAN RCP FES VV/ TRASEGUA jRD J 2 12 2501,571 INSTALL SALAVAGED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES 8 SIZES) j 85 13 2502 521 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT W/ APRON I 326 14 2502.521 18' CMP DRIVEVVAY CULVERT W/ APRON _ 120 15 2503.511 15" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 126 16 2503.511 18" RCP CL, 5 STORM SEWERPIPE 61 17 2503.511 21" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 226 18 2506.502 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 4065 6 19 2506.601 INFILTRATION BASIN 6 20 2511,501 CL. 3 RIPRAP VV/ GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 94.2 21 2511.501 EL. 4 RIPRAP WI GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC 16.2 SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4 - STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. CONCRETE CURB 8 GUTTER 213 2104,501 jREIVIOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL TYPES) 6 3 2104.505 !REMOVE 8 DISPOSE OF EXIST. BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 19710 4 2104.509 /REMOVE SIGN 18 5 2104.523 ISALVAGE MAILBOX 20 6 2104.523 'SALVAGE POST & SIGN 9 7 2105.501 !COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 19252 6 2105,522 /SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV), SPEC 3149.213 8527 9 2105.604 IGEOTEXTILE FOR ROAD STABILIZATION; MnDOT TYPE V 300 10 2106.607 SUBGRADE CORRECTION 100 11 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (ROADVVAY) 65 12 2211.501 CL.5 AGGREGATE BASE 7534 13 2357,502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 1044 14 2360,501 SPVVEA240B BITU1v1INOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 1667 15 2360.501 SPWEA240B BITUMINOUS VVEARING COURSE (DRIVES) 115 16 2360.502 SPNWB230B BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS/ 3111 17 2502.501 4" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 18 2502.541 4" PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN VV/BACKF ILL & WRAP 6083 19 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE, FITTINGS, & STEEL CAP) 26 20 2502.602 DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 10 21 2531,501 8418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 12650 22 2531.602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 1 23 2531.602 CONCRETE CURB CUT 38 24 2531.602 6" CONCRETE FLUME 82 25 2531.618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 8 26 2540.602 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX 20 27 2554,602 PERMANENT BARRICADE 1 28 2564,531 'INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS 8 ASSEMBLY) 18 29 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 9 30 2564 533 'FURNISH SIGN PANELS, TYPE C 117.00 31 2582.502 4" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW EPDXY 4720 32 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE WHITE EPDXY 12240 33 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 755 34 2582,502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW EXPDXY 1265 35 2582.502 24' SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 25 SUBTOTAL TOTAL BASE BID UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA CY CY ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE T.A. SCHIFSKY UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 500.00 j $ 1,000.00 5 1,287.50 1 $ 2,575,00 550.00 I $ 1,100.00 $ 1,565.60 j $ 3,131,20 650,00 I $ 1,300.00 ; $ 2,183.60 I $ 4,367.20 10.00 1 $ 850,00 I $ 21.63 I $ 1,838.55 25.00 $ 8,150.00 $ 28,84 $ 9,401.84 30.00 $ 3,600 00 I $ 33.99 j $ 4,078,80 30.00 $ 3,780,00 j $ 26.78 $ 3,374.28 33.00 $ 2,013.00 I $ 29,87 $ 35.00 S 7,910.00 $ 34.00 $ 2,800.00 $ 16,800.00 $ 2.266.00 5 1,200.00 $ 7,200.00 $ 600.00 $ 90,00 $ 8,478.00 $ 100.00 1 $ 110.00 $ 1,782,00 $ 105.00 $ $ 87,070,00 LF $ 5.00 EA $ 150 00 SY $ 2.50 EA $ 50.00 EA $ 75 00 EA $ 75.00 CY I $ 6.00 CY I $ 10.00 SY S 2.50 CY j $ 25.00 RS $ 250.00 TN $ 13.00 $ 2.50 TN TN TN EA LF EA EA LF EA EA SY SF EA EA EA EA SF LF LF LF LF LF $ 60.00 70.00 13 58.00 $ 175.00 5.00 $ 150,00 $ 200.00 11.00 $ 350.00 $ 250 00 $ 100.00 32.00 75,00 500.00 135.00 150.00 9.50 1 50 1.00 1.00 0.75 3 00 $ 1,065.00 $ 3.09 $ 658.17 900.00 $ 360.50 $ 2,163.00 $ 49,275.00 $ 1.00 / $ 19,710 00 900.00 $ 30.00 $ 540.00 1,500.00 , $ 25 00 $ 500.00 675.00 $ 30.00 $ 270.00 $ 154,016.00 ! 1 $ 8.00 S 154,016,00 $ 85,270,00 j $ 8.29 $ 70,688,83 750.00 $ 1.00 $ 300,00 $ 2,500.00 $ 15.00 5 1,500.00 $ 16,250.00 $ 100 00 $ 6,500.00 $ 97.942.00 $ 8.50 $ 64,039.00 $ 2,610 00 $ 3.00 $ 3,132.00 $ 112,020,00 $ 66.00 5 123,222_00 $ 8,050.00 $ 80.00 $ $ 180,438.00 I $ 58.00 $ 1,050.00 I $ $ 30,415.00 $ $ 3,900.00 $ $ 2,000.00 $ 139,150.00 350.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 8,200.00 256.00 $ 1,500.00 500.00 j S $ 2,430.00 $ 5 1,350.00 $ 13 1,111.50 I 5 $ 7,080.00 1 S S 12.240,00 755.00 ,$ $ 948.75 ! $ $ 75.00 $ $ 936,972.25 $ 1,848,435.25 ! 4-12.00 3.50 155.00 250.00 8,34 400.00 10.00 35 00 50.00 1000 400,00 55,00 50,00 24.00 0.62 0.32 0.31 0.10 15.45 13 13 1,822.07 7,684,00 13,596.00 3,600.00 9,420,00 1,701.00 103,086.54 TKDA BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 1,000.00 I $ 2,000,00 $ 1,550.00 $ 3,100.00 ) $ 2,025.00 ' $ 4,050.00 j 25.00 1 $ 2,125 00 80.50 $ 26,243.00 13 83,00 $ 9,960.00 46.75 $ 5,890.50 13 49.00 $ 2,989.00 87.00 $ 19,662,00 $ 2,250.00 $ 13,500,00 $ 200.00 $ 1,200.00 80.00 $ 7,536.00 80,00 $ 1,296.00 j $ 139,373.50 3.00 $ 85.00 $ 1.50 $ 30.00 $ 45 00 $ 30.00 $ 7.25 $ 8.50 $ 3.75 I $ 19.00 $ 140.00 $ 10.90 $ 2.40 $ 55.85 $ 639.00 510.00 29,565.00 j 540.00 900 00 270.00 139,577 00 72,479.50 1,125.00 1,900.00 9,100.00 82,120 60 2,505.60 104,271.95 9,200,00 $ 91.45 $ 10,516.75 180,438.00 $ 55.80 $ _173,593.80 2,472,00 $ 230.00 $ 1,380.00 21.290 50 $ 3.75 $ 22,811.25 _ 4,030.00 $ 200.00 $ 5,200.00 2.500.00 $ 150.00 ' $ 1,500.00 105,501.00 $ 9.00 $ 113,850,00 400.00 $ 400.00 $ 400.00 j 380.00 I 30.00 $ 1,140.00 1 j 2.952.00 $ 39.00 $ 3,198.00 400.00 $ 46.00 $ 368.00 200,00 I $ 80.00 $ 1,600.00 400,00 $ 260.00 $ 260.00 990.00 $ 60.00 $ 1,080.00 450 OD j $ 2,808.00 = $ 2,926.40 I $ 3,916.80 ! $ 234.05 I $ 126.50 $ 386.25 ; $ 789,240.50 1,606,833.47 E 55.00 $ 24.00 $ 0.55 $ 0,31 S 0.27 5 0.27 5 4.50 5 495.00 2,608.00 2,596 00 3,794 40 203.85 _ 341.55 112.50 j $ 792,752.75 $ 1,618,210.80 Page 2 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9. 2013, AT 2:00 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION 1.1 TKDA ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE T.A, SCHIFSKY BURSCHVILLE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504,602 DEDUCT 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ (2,500 00) $ (5,000.00) $ (3,700,00) $ (7,400,00) .,._ 4,000.00) $ (8,000,00) 2 2504.602 16" VVATERMAIN OFFSET 2 EA $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000,00 $ 6,500,00 $ 13,000,00 5.000,00 $ 10,000,00 3 2504,602 DEDUCT 12" GATE VALVE 8. BOX 13 EA $ (2,800.00) $ (36,400.00) $ (2,730,00) $ (35,490,00) (3,(00.00) $ (40,300.00) 4 2504.602 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 13 EA $ 4,000.00 $ 52,000.00 $ 3,100.00 $ 40,300.00 3,000,00 $ 39,000.00 5 2504,603 DEDUCT 12" DIP C L. 52 WATERMAIN 5915 LF $ (55.00)1 $ (325,325.00) $ (43,00) $ (254,345.00)1 (45.00) $ (266,175.00) 6 2504.603 16" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 5915 LF $ 63.00 $ 372,645.00 $ 58.00 1 $ 343,070.00 1 57.00 $ 337,155.00 7 2504.603 DEDUCT 12" HDPE DR. 1I(DIPS), BY HELD 2435 LF 5 (58,00) $ (141,230.00)1 $ (57,00)1 $ (138,795.00)1 (51,00) $ (124,185,00) 2504.603 16" HOPE DR, 11(DIPS), BY HDD 2435 LF $ 82,00 $ 199,670,00 , $ 80.00 1 $ 194,800.00 1 $ 86.00 $ 209,410.00 9 _ 2504.608 DEDUCT 12" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 3200 EA (5,50) $ (17,600,00)1 $ (4.60) $ (14,720.00)1 $ (4.75) $ (15,200.00) 10 2504.608 16" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 5438 EA 6.50 $ 35,347.00 1 $ 5,80 ! $ 31.540.40 1 5,75 $ 31,268.50 SUBTOTAL I $ 144,107.00 ; ! $ 171,980.40 I $ 171,973.50 GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 $ 1,992,541,15 : 1 $ 1778 , 1 ,,793.87 1 1 $ 1,791,184.30 • I I 1 Page 3 TABULATION OF BIDS KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA KDA PROJECT NO. '15230.000 MUNICIPAL. STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 200,105-002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9, 2013, AT 2:00 PM •DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION DIVISION 1 - GENERAL 1 2021,501 MOBILIZATION 2 2101.502 CLEARING 3 2101.507 GRUBBING _ 4 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORRVVO(CV) 5 2453.610 EXPLORATORY DIGGING 6 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 7 2573 502 ..SILT FENCE 8 2573.530 'INLE F PROTECTION 9 2573.602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 10 2573.602 CULVERT PROTECTION 11 2575.505 SODDING (SALT RESISTANT) 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT. 3 _ 13 2575.605 SEEDING(SEED MIXTURE 250 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 3) 14 2575.605 !SEEDING (SEED MIX-RJRE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 4) 1SUBTOTAL DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN 1 2504.602 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 2504.602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMA1N 3 2504.602 16" HYDRANT 4 2504.602 IV GATE VALVE & BOX_ 5 2504.602 18" GATE VAVLE & [30)1 6 2504.602 ,12" GATE VAVLE & BOX 7 2504 602 &1'' CORPORATION STOP 8 2504.602 !I .5" CORPORATION STOP 9 i 2504.602 j2" CORPORATION STOP 10 2504.602 11" CURB STOP AND BOX 11 2504.602 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX 12 2504.602 2" CURB STOP AND BOX 13 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 14 2504.603 1.5" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 15 2504.603 2" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 16 2504.603 6" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN i 7 2504.603 8" DIP CL. 52 VvATERMAIN 18 2504.603 12" Dlp CL. 52 WATERMAIN 10 2504.603 12" HDPE DR, 1101PS), BY HOD 20 2504.608 10.101p COMPACT FITTINGS 21 . 2564,551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER SUBTOTAL DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 2104,501 ,REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS (ALL TYPES 8 S(ZES) 2 2104.52) :SALVAGE CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES 8 SIZES) 3 2501.515 115" RCP FES MI RASH GUARD 4 2501.515 118' RCP FES 1N/ TRASH GUARD 5 2501.515 i21" RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD 6 2501.521 22" SPAN RCP CL 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 7 2501 521 28" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 8 2501.521 ;36' SPAN RCP CL 5 STORM SEWER PIPE EA $ EA $ EA $ EA $ EA $ EA $ EA $ EA I $ EA 15 EA EA $ EA $ LF $ LF $ LF $ LF $ LF S LF 5 LF $ Les 15 EA I $ 1 TKDA 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY , UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1.00 LS $ 24,353.40 $ 24,353.40 $ 14,750.00 $ 14,750.00 $ 56,629.00 $ 56,629.00 1 TREE $ 264.72 $ 264.72 $ 600.00 $ 600.00 $ _ 300.00 S 300.00 I TREE $ 158,83 $ 158.83 5 200,00 $ 200,00 $ 100.00 $ 100.00 2744 CY $ 18.74 $ 51,422.56 5 0.01 $ 27.44 $ 16.50 $ 45,276.00 __ 8 HR $ 370.62 $ 2,964 96 $ 600.00 $ 4,800.00 $ 205.00 $ 1,640.00 1.00 , LS 5 3,970.87 $ 3,970,87 $ 4,500 00 $ 4,5013.00 ; $ 3,750 00 $ 3,750.00 5880 LF $ 1.76 $ 10,348.80 I 1.85 I $ 10,878.00 I $ 1.70 $ 9,996,00 - , 9 EA $ 95.30 $ 857.70 I 150,00 ' $ 1,350.00 1 $ 100.00 $ 900.00 2 . EA $ 423.56 $ 847.12 1 2,000.00 ! $ 4,000.00 I $ 900 00 $ 1,800.00 14 EA i $ 95.30 $ 1,334.20 ! 100.00_ _ 5 1,400.00 , $ 100.00 $ 1,400.00 213 SY I $ 9.53 $ 2.029.89 , $ 6.00 $ 1,278.00 : $ 9.00 $ 1,917 00 16465 i SY j $ 1,04 $ 17,123.60 ' $ 1.00 5 16,465.00 $ 1.00 $ 16,465.00 3,36 AC 1 $ 534,74 $ 1,796.73 : $ 500 OD $ 1,680.00 ; $ 1,400.00 $ 4,704.00 0.23 AC : $ 1,549,17 $ 356.31 , $ 1,500 00 $ 345.00 1 ' $ 2,000.00 $ 460.00 $ 117,829.69 $ 62,273.44 , $ 145,337.00 2 2 13 13 3 15 3 18 1 3 18 135 548 45 303 52 5954 2435 4294 2 3,917.93 $ 7,835,86 $ 3,650.00 $ 7,300,00 .5 3,500.00 $ 7,000.00 3,494 37 $ 6,988.74 $ 483.00 $ 966.00 ' $ 1,200.00 $ _ 2,400.00 i 3,335.53 $ 43,361.89 $ 4,060.00 $ 52,780.00 $ 3,585,00 $ 46,605.00 I 1,270,68 $ 16,518.84 $ 1,150.00 $ 14,950.00 _ $ 1,380.00 $ 17,940,00 i 1,673 06 $ 5,019.18 $ -1,920.00 $ 5,760.00 $ 1,815.00 $ 5,445 00 I 2,890.80 $ 43,362.00 $ 3,240,00 $ 48,600.00 $ 3.390.00 $ 50,850.00 285.90 $ 857.70 $ 110.00 $ 330.00 $ 280.00 $ 840.00 624.75 $ 11,245 50 $ 377.00 $ 6,786.00 : $ 340,00 $ 6,120,00 762.41 $ 762.41 $ 538.00 $ 538.00 E $ 535.00 $ 535 00 582.39 $ 1,747.17 $ 259.00 $ 777.00 i . $ 245,00 $ 735.00 709.46 $ 12,770.28 I $ 404.00 $ 7,272.00 I $ 390.0D $ 7,020.00 868.30 $ 868.30 i $ 639,00 $ 639.00 ' $ 620.00 $ 620.00 ' 21.18 $ 2,859.30 j $ 26.90 $ 3,631 50 1 $ 22,25 $ 3,003.75 24.35 $ 13,343.80 $ 35.60 $ 19,508.80 $ 27.50 ; $ 15,070.00 31.77 $ 1,429,65 $ 46.80 $ 2,106.00 _$_ 45.00 • $ 2,025.00 28.59 $ 8,662 77 $ 33,50 $ 10,150.50 36.00 ' $ 10,908.00 33.88 $ 1,761.76 $ 38.50 $ 2,002.00 $0.00 $ 2,600.00 45.53 $ 271,085.62 $ 46,70 $ 278,051.80_ _ 50.25 $ 299,188,50 I 60.36 $ 146,976,60 $ 56,00 $ 136,360,00 53,65 $ 130,637_75 4.87 $ 20.911.78 $ 4 85 $ 20,825.90 8 4.75 $ 20,396.50 ; 79.42 $ 158,84 $ 120.00 $ 240,00 180.00 $ 360.00 $ 616,52799 $ 619,574.50 _$ 630,299,50 , I• 016 LF $ 7,41 $ _ 7,52856 $ 5.40 ' $ 5,486.40 $ 5,00 $ 5,080,00 i 85LF $ 12.71 $ 1,080,35 $ 8,60 $ 731.00 $ 20.00 $ 1,700.00 4 EA $ 1,195.56 $ 4,782.24 * $ 678.00 I $ 2,712.00 5 810.00 $ 3.240.00 4 EA $ 1,249.50 $ 4,998.00 $ 735.00 $ 2,940.00 $ 865.00 $ 3,460.00 6 EA $ 1,461.28 $ 8,767.68 $ 962,00 $ 5,772.00 $ 1,080.00 $ 6,480,00 47 LF $ 49.77 $ 2,339,19 $ 49.20 I $ 2,312,40 $ 68 00 $ 3,196.00_' 49 LF 1 5 61 42 $ 3,009.58 I $ 57 70 $ 2,827.30 I $ 70.00 $ 3,430 00 : 60 LF , S 84,71 $ 5,082.60 1 $ 69,40 $ 4,164.00 I 1 $ 85.00 $ 5,100.00 - j Page 4 KEATS AVENUE MSA S MEET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA TKDA PROJEC 1 NO, 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206,105..002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9.2013, AT 2:00 PIO "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. 9 10 I 12 13 1 14 15 113 17 18 19 20 21 DESCRIPTION 2501.525 22" SPAN RCP FES VVi TRASH GUARD 2501,525 28" SPAN RCP FES VW TRASH GUARD 2501.525 36" SPAN RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD 2501.571 INSTALL SALAVAGED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES & SIZES/1 2502.521 1511CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT VW APRON 2502.521 18" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT W/ APRON 2503,511 15" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2503,511 18' RCP CL, 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2503,511 121" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 2506.502 148" DIAMETER MANHOLE. TYPE 406S 2506.601 INFILTRATION BASIN 2511.501 CL. 3 RIPRAP WI GEO1EXTILE FILTER FABRIC 2511.501 CL. 4 RIPRAP VV( GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4- STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104,501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST, CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 2 2104,501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL TYPES) 3 2104.505 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4 2104.509 REMOVE SIGN 5 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX 6 2104.523 SALVAGE POST & SIGN 7 2105,501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 8 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW(CV) SPEC 3149.2B 9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FOR ROAD STABILIZATION: MnDOT TYPE V 10 2106.607 SUBGRADE CORRECTION 11 2112.501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (ROADWAY) 12 2211.501 CL,5 AGGREGATE BASE 13 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 14 2300.501 SPWEA2408 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 15 2360.501 SPVVEA240B BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (DRIVES) 16 2360.502 1SPNVVB23013 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 17 2502,501 14" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 18 2502 54 I 4" PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN VV/BACKFILL & WRAP 19 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE, FITTINGS, & STEEL CAP) 20 2502.602 DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 21 2531,501 6418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 22 2531,602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 23 2531.002 CONCRETE CURB CUT 24 2531.602 6" CONCRETE FLUME 25 2531.618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 26 2540.502 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX 27 2554.602 PERMANENT BARRICADE 28 2564,531 INSTALL SIGN PANELS,TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) 29 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 30 2564,533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS, TYPE C 31 2582.502 4" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 32 2582,502 14" SOLID LINE WHITE - EPDXY 33 2582.502 14" SOLID LINE YELLOW- EPDXY 34 2582.502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW - EXPDXY 35 2582.502 -24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY SUBTOTAL 'TOTAL BASE BID QUANTITY 2 2 2 85 326 120 126 61 226 ! LF 5 EA 6 EA 94.2 CY 16.2 CY 213 6 19710 18 20 9 19252 8527 300 100 65 7534 1044 1867 115 3111 6 6083 26 10 12050 1 38 82 8 20 18 9 117.00 4720 12240 755 1265 25 UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF RS TN GA TN TN TN EA LF EA EA LF EA EA SY SF EA EA EA EA *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 1 $ 1,323.63 $ 2,647.26 $ 1.600.53 $ 3,219.06 $ 2,244,87 $ 4,489.74 $ 22.44 $ 1,907A0 : ' $ 29.65 $ 9,065.90 [ $ 34.94 $ 4,192.80 $ 27.53 $ 3,468.78 $ 30.71 $ 1,873.31 1 $ 34 94 $ 7,896,44 ; $ 2,329.58 $ 13,977.48 $ 206 49 $ 1,238.94 [ $ 100.60 1 $ 0,476.52 S 111 18 $ 1,801.12 I $ 103,442.95 REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 749.00 $ 1,498.00 I $ 1.140 00 , $ 2,280.00 $ 1,520,00 $ 3,040.00 $ 24.70 $ 2,099.50 $ 42.60 $ 13,887.60 $ 45,10 $ 5,412.00 13 26.60 $ 3,351,60 28 60 $ 1,744.60 13 33.10 $ 7,480.60 $ 2,380.00 $ 14,280,00 $ 360.00 $ 2,160.00 $ 102.00 $ 9,608.40 $ 107.00 $ 1,733.40 $ 95,520,00 LF $ 2.91 $ 619.83 $ EA 1 $ 79.42 $ 476.52 $ SY $ 1.32 $ 26,017,20 1 $ EA $ 26.47 $ 476,46] S EA $ 23.30 $ 466.00 1 $ EA $ 65.65 $ 590,85[0 $ 25 00 $ CY $ 7.36 $ 141,694,72 $ CY $ 8.76 $ 74,696,52 $ SY $ 3.87 13 1,161.00 $ CY $ 19.94 $ 1,994.00 $ 142.95 $ 9,291.75 $ 11.28 $ 84,983,52 1$ 2.24 $ 2,338.56 1 $ 57.39 $ 107,147.13 $ 90.17 1 $ 10,369.55 1 $ 55 32 $ 172,100,52 $ 15 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 13 $ I $ s $ SF 1 $ LF $ LF LF LF LF 13 13 13 13 232 96 $ 3 62 $ 201.19 $ 132 36 $ 8 63 $ 402.38 $ 1,397.76 $ 22,020 46 $ 5,230 94 $ 1,323.60 $ 109,169 50 1 $ 402 38 $ 29.65 $ 1,126,70 $ 40.03 $ 3,282.46 $ 47,65 S 381.20 : $ 39.18 1 13 783.60 $ 264.72 S 264.72 $ 52.95.13 953.10 $ 52.94 $ 476,46 $ 24.35 $ 2,848.95 $ 0.64 $ 3,020.80 $ 0,33 $ 4,039,20 $ 0.32 $ 241.60 $ 0.60 $ 759.00 $ 14.82 $ 370,50 $ $ 792,517.06, I $ 1,632,317.68 • 1.50 $ 125 00 $ 1,00 $ 25.00 $ 22.00 $ 12.24 $ 8,00 $ 1.80 $ 12.24 1 $ 50.00 I $ [ 11.30 $ 2.25 ; $ 54.85 $ 90.45 $ 54.80 S 150.00 $ 6.00 $ 80 00 $ 25,90 $ 8.10 $ 300.00 $ 5.00 $ 43.50 I $ 35.00 $ 37,00 1 $ 250.00 $ 50.00 $ 50.00 1 $ 23.00 $ 0.60 $ 0.31 $ [ 0,30 $ 0.06 $ 14.00 $ 1 TKDA MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT S 650,00 $ 1,300 00 1 S 920.00 $ 1,840.00 $ 1,135.00 $ 2,270.00 13 20.00 $ 1,700.00 $ 31.00 $ 10,106.00 13 34.50 $ 4,140.00 13 28.85 $ 3,635.10 32.00 1 $ 1,952 00 $ 36,00 $ 8,136.00 $ 2,010.00 1 $ 12,060.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 9,000,00 80.00 $ 7,530,00 13 80.00 $ 1,296.00 $ 96,657.10 319 50 $ 5.00 $ 750 00 1 $ 100:00 $ 19,710.00 1 $ 1.80 $ 450.00 1 $ 25.00 $ 440.00 1 $ 40,00 $ 225.00 $ 25.00 $ 235,644 48 $ 6.50 S 68,216.00 $ 9.00 , 5 540.00 $ 2.00 $ 1,224.00 $ 8.00 $ 3,250.00 $ 125.00 $ 85,134.20 $ 10.00 $ 2,349_00 $ 2.25 $ 102,404.95 $ 54.85 $ 10,401.75 ; 5 90.45 1 $ 170,482.80 $ 54 80 1 $ 900.00 [ $ 300.00 1 $ 36,498,00 $ 5.75 $ 2.000 00 $ 300.00 $ 250.00 $ 100.00 1 $ '102,465.00 $ 8.15 1 $ 300.00 $ 380 OD $ 190.00 S 28.00 I $ 3,567 00 $ 37.80 , $ 280.00 $ 45.00 $ 740.00 $ 250.08 $ 900.00 $ 450.00 $ 2,691.00j $ 2,832.00 1 $ 3,794.40 $ 226.50 $ 75.90 $ 350.00 $ $ 860,381.48 I $ 1,637,750.22 75.00 - 13 250.00 50.00 $ 50.00 [ $ 23.00 I $ 0.56 $ 0 28 $ 0.28 $ 0.26 $ 10.00 $ 1,065.00 600.00 35,478.00 450,00 600 00 225.00 125,138.00 76,743.00 600.00 800.00 8,125.00 75,340.00 2,349.00 102,404,95 10,401.75 170,482.80 I,800.00 34,977.25 7,800,00 1,000.00 103,097.50 380.00 1,064.00 3,099.60 360.00 1,500.00 250.00 900 00 450.00 2,691.00 2,643.20 1 3,427.20 1 211,40 1 328.00 250.00 777,232.55 ,649,526.15 Page 5 KEA LS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE. ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230,000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENEDAPRIL 9, 2013, AT 200 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO NO. DESCRIPTION 'ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504,602 DEDUCT 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 2 2504.602 16" VVATERMAIN OFFSET 3 2504.602 DEDUCT 121` GATE VALVE & BOX 123 4 2504.002 16" BU ERFLY VALVE 1 13 5 2504 603 DEDUCT 12" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 5915 6 2504.603 16" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 5915 7 2504.603 DEDUCT 12" EIDPE DR. 11(DIPS), BY HOD 2435 8 2504.603 6" HDPE DR. 11(DIPS), BY HDD 2435 9 2504,608 ;DEDUCT 12" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 3200 0 2504,608 116" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 5438 SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. 1 `DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION HARDRIVES, INC REDSTONE CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL QUANTITY UNIT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT 1 EA $ (3,917.93) $ (7,835.86) $ (3,650.00) $ (7,300,00), $ EA $ 6,882.05 $ 13,705.70 $ 6,460,00 , $ 12,920.00 $ EA $ (2,890 80) $ (37,580,40) $ (3,240 00) $ (42,120.00) $ EA $ 3,282.59 $ 42.673,67 $ 3,130.00 $ 40.690.00 $ LF $ (45.53) $ (269,309.95) $ (46.70) $ (276,230.50) $ LF $ 61.42 $ 363,299.30 $ 63 60 $ 376,194.00 $ LF $ (60.36) $ (146,976.60) S (56.00) $ (136,36D 00) $ LF $ 84,71 $ 206,268,85 $ 90.00 $ 219,150.00 $ EA $ (4.87)1 $ (15,504.00)1 $ (4.85) $ ((5.520.00) $ EA I $ 6.14 1 $ 33,389,32 $ 4.95 $ 26,918.10 $ $ 182,110,03 I i $ 198,341,60 $ 1,814,427,71 " $ 1,836,091,82 '11 TKDA MILLER EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT (3,500.00) $ (7,000.00)I 4,845 00 $ 9,690,00 , (3,390.00) $ (44,070.00)j • 3,865 DO $ 50,245.00 j • (50.25) $ (297,228 75) II 61,00 $ 360,615,00 ' (53.65) 5 (130,637,75) 77.95 $ 189,808.25 (4.75)1 $ (15.200.00) 5.75 $ 31,268.50 $ 147,690.25 $ 1,797,216.40 * Page 6 TABULATION OF BIDS KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105=002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9, 2013, AT 2:00 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION "DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINGER CONSTRUCTION ITEM MN/DOT PRICEUNIT TOTAL NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNITAMOUNT DIVISION 1 - GENERAL 1 2021,501 MOBILIZATION 1 1.00 LS $ 87.000.00 I $ 87,000,00 2 2101.502 CLEARING 1 1 TREE S 500.00 = $ 500.00 3 2101 507 GRUBBING 1 TREE $ 500.00 1 $ 500.00 4 2105.525 TOPSOIL BORROW (CV2744 0,01 I $); CY S 27.44 5 2453.510 EXPLORATORY DIGGING 8 HR S 285.00 1 $ 2,280.00 6 2563.601 TRAFFIC CONTROL 518°8°0 LS $ 4,200,00 $ 4,200.00 7 2573 502 SILT FENCE LF $ 1,85 $ 10,878.00 8 2573.530 INLET PROTECTION 9 EA 100.00 $ 000.00 9 2573.602 TEMPORARY ROCK CONSTRUCTION ENTRANCE 2 EA 050.00 $ 1,900.00 EA 1 10 2573,602 CULVERT PROTECTION 14 95.00 $ '1,330.00 11 2575,505 SODDING (SALT RESISTANT) 213 SY 10.00 $ 2,130.00 , 12 2575.523 EROISION CONTROL BLANKET, CAT, 3 16465 SY 1.05 $ 17288.25 13 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 250 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 3) 3.36 AG 560.00 $ 1,881,60 14 2575.605 SEEDING (SEED MIXTURE 328 AND FERTILIZER TYPE, 4/ 0.23 AC 1,600,00 $ 368.00 1 ! SUBTOTAL $ 131,183.29 DIVISION 2 - WATERMAIN • 1 2504 602 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 1 2504 602 CONNECT TO EXISTING WATERMAIN 3 = 2504.602 6" HYDRANT 4 2504.502 6" GATE VALVE & BOX 5 = 2504,602 8" GATE VAVLE & BOX 6 = 2504.602 12" GATE VAVLE & BOX 7 2504.602 1" CORPORATION STOP 8 = 2504.602 1.5" CORPORATION STOP 9 1 2504.602 2" CORPORATION STOP 10 = 2504,602 1" CURB STOP AND BOX 11 2504.602 1.5" CURB STOP AND BOX 12 1 2504.602 2" CURB STOP AND BOX 13 1 2504.603 1" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE 14 1 2504.603 1.5" TYPE K COPPER VVATER SERVICE PIPE 15 2504 603 2" TYPE K COPPER WATER SERVICE PIPE _ 16 1 2504.603 6" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 17 2504.603 8" DIP CL, 52 WATERMAIN 18 2504.603 12" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 19 2504.603 12" HOPE DR, 11(DIPS), BY HDD 20 2504.606 MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 21 2564.551 OFF ROAD STRUCTURE MARKER SUBTOTAL DIVISION 3 - STORM SEWER 1 2104.501 REMOVE PIPE CULVERTS (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 2 2104,521 SALVAGE CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 3 2501,515 15" RCP FES W/ 1RASH GUARD 4 ! 2501.515 18" RCP FES WITRASH GUARD 5 ; 2501,515 210 RCP FES VV/ TRASH GUARD 6 = 2501.521 22" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEVVER PIPE 7 = 2501.521 281' SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEVVER PIPE 8 2501.521 36" SPAN RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE TKDA DRESEL CONTRACTING R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT I $ '130,000.00 130,000.00 $ 100,000.00 1 $ $ 100.00 $ 100.00 $ 150,00 j $ $ 100 00 $ 100.00 $ 150.00 25.00 $ 165.00 $ 5,000.00 1.75 $ 100.00 $ 500.00 90.00 9.25 1.10 $ 600.00 $ 1,600.00 2 EA $ 3,200.00 $ 6,400.00 $ 2 EA 1 $ 2,000.00 $ 4,000,00 $ 13 EA 1 $ 4,200.00 $ 54,600.00 $ 13 EA 1 $ 1,140.00 $ 14,820.00 3 EA ; $ 1,665,00 $ 4,995.00 15 EA = $ 3,000.00 $ 45,000,00 3 EA 1 $ 173 00 $ 519.00 _18 ; , EA 1 $ 363.00 $ 6,534.00 1 EA 1 $ 512,00 $ 512,00 3 EA I $ 267.00 $ 801.00 1$ 18 EA / $ 405.00 $ 7,290.00 I$ 1 EA $ 570.00 $ 570.00 I$ 135 LF $ 25.00 $ 3,375.00 I $ 548 LF $ 29.00 $ 15,892.00 $ 45 LF $ 35.00 $ 1,575,00 $ 303 LF $ 36.00 $ 10,908.00 $ 52 LF $ 52.00 $ 2,704,00 $ 5954 LF $ 48,00 $ 285,792.00 $ 2435 LF $ 54.00 $ 131,490 00 1 $ 4294 LBS $ 7.80 $ 33,493.20 1 $ 2 EA $ 37.00 i $ 74.00 1 1 $ 1 $ 631,344,20 I I 1 1 1016 LF $ 3.60 $ 3,657.60 1 $ 85 LF $ 10.30 $ 875.50 = $ 4 EA $ 667,00 $ 2,608,00 ; $ 4 EA ; $ 713.00 $ 2,852,00 $ 6 EA 1 $ 778.00 i $ 4,668.00 $ 47 LF 1 $ 52.00 : $ 2,444.00 $ 49 LF 1 $ 64,00 j $ 3,136 00 $ 60 LF I $ 80,00 . $ 4,800.00 $ $ 68,600.00 $ 24.00 $ 1,320.00 $ 500.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 7,600.00 $ 10,290.00 $ 1.75 900.00 $ 100.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 1,260.00 $ 100 00 $ 1,970.25 $ 9.50 $ $ 18,111,50 $ 1.00 $ $ 2,016.00 $ 525.00 $ 368.00 $ 1,500.00 $ $ 241,035,75 , 100,000,00 150,00 150,00 $ 65,856 00 $ 4,800 00 $ 7,600.00 $ 10,290.00 900.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 1,400.00 2,023.50 16.465.00 1,764.00 345.00 213,743.50 3,450.00 $ 6,900,00 1$ 6,000,00 $ 12,000.0D 950.00 $ 1.900.00 ' $ 1,000.00 $ 2.000.00 3,500,00 $ 45,500.00 $ 4,000,00 $ 52.000.00 1,625,00 $ 21,125.00 $ 1,100.00 $ 14,300.00 ; 1,925.00 $ 5,775.00 $ 1,500.00 $ 4,500.00 3,500 00 $ 52,500.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 41,250.00 225.00 $ 675 00 $ 100.00 $ 300.00 425.00 $ 7,650,00 $ 250.00 $ 4,500.00 550.00 $ 550.00 $ 350.00 $ 350.00 ;0 250.00 $ 750.00 $ 200.00 $ 600.00 350,00 $ 6,300.00 $ 300.00 1 $ 5,400,00 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 $ 500.00 ;_ 14,00 $ 1,890.00 $ 18.00 $ 2,430.00 18,00 $ 9,864,00 1 $ 24.50 / $ 13,426.00; 22_00 $ 990.00 $ 32.00 1 $ 1,440.00 25.00 $ 7,575=00 $ 28,00 $ 8,484 00 30.00 I $ 1,560.00 $ 34.50 $ 1,794.00 40.00 = $ 238,160.00 $ 42.00 $ 250,068.00 53,00 ' $ 129,055,00 $ 52.00 $ 126,620.00 3.85 . $ 16,531.90 $ 4,50 $ 19,323.00 80.00 = S 160,00 , $ 100.00 $ 200.00 $ 555,910,90 ' $ 561,485,00 10.00 S 10,150.00 $ 6.00 $ 6,096.00 20.00 $ 1,700 00 $ 10.00 , $ 850.00 650,00 $ 2,500.00 $ 700.00 $ 2,800.00 850.00 I $ 3,400.00 1 $ 800.00 $ 3,200.00 900.00 $ 5,400.00 1 $ 1,000.00 $ 6,000,00 55,00 $ 2,585.00 1 $ 46.00 $ 2,162.00 75 00 $ 3,675.00 I $ 56,00 $ 2,744,00 100.00 $ 6,000.00 I $ 80,00 $ 4,800.00 Page 7 MN/DOT NO, 2501.525 2501.525 2501.525 2501.571 2502.521 2502.521 2503.511 2503.511 2503.511 2506,502 2506,601 2511.501 2511,501 KEATS AVENUE tvlSA STREET AND WATERMAIN IMPROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO, MINNESO TKDA PROJECT NO, 15230.000 MUNICIPAL. STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENED. APRIL 5, 2013, AT 200 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM NO 9 1D 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 DESCRIPTION 22" SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD 28" SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD 36" SPAN RCP FES W/ TRASH GUARD INSTALL SALAVAGED CONCRETE PIPE CULVERT (ALL TYPES & SIZES) 15" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT VW APRON 18" CMP DRIVEWAY CULVERT VV/ APRON 15" RCP CL, 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 18" RCP CL, 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 21" RCP CL. 5 STORM SEWER PIPE 48" DIAMETER MANHOLE, TYPE 4065 INFILTRATION BASIN CL. 3 RIPRAP VVI GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC CL. 4 RIPRAP W/ GEOTEXTILE FILTER FABRIC SUBTOTAL DIVISION 4 - STREETS & RESTORATION 1 2104.501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 2 2104,501 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST. FLUME (ALL TYPES) 3 2104.505 REMOVE & DISPOSE OF EXIST, BITUMINOUS PAVEMENT 4 2104,509 REMOVE SIGN 5 2104.523 SALVAGE MAILBOX 6 2104.523 SALVAGE POST & SIGN 7 2105,501 COMMON EXCAVATION (P) 8 2105.522 SELECT GRANULAR BORROW (CV), SPEC 3149.26 9 2105.604 GEOTEXTILE FOR ROAD STABILIZATION. MnDO r TYPE V 10 2106.607 SUBGRADE CORRECTION__ 11 2112 501 SUBGRADE PREPARATION (ROADVVAY) 12 2211.501 CL.5 AGGREGATE BASE 13 2357.502 BITUMINOUS MATERIAL FOR TACK COAT 14 2360.501 SPVVEA2406 BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 15 2360.501 SPVVEA240B BITUMINOUS WEARING COURSE (DRIVES) 15 2360,502 SPNWB2308 BITUMINOUS NON -WEARING COURSE (STREETS) 17 2502,501 4" PRECAST CONCRETE HEADWALL 18 2502 541 4" PERFORATED PVC EDGE DRAIN W/BACKFILT 8 WRAP , 19 2502.602 DRAINTILE CLEANOUT (INCL. PIPE, FITTINGS. & STEEL CAP) 20 2502.602 DRAINTILE CONNECTION INTO CATCH BASIN 21 2531,501 8418 CONCRETE CURB & GUTTER 22 2531.602 CONCRETE PEDESTRIAN RAMP 23 2531.602 CONCRETE CURB CUT 24 2531.602 6" CONCRETE FLUME 25 2531,618 CAST IRON TRUNCATED DOME PANELS 26 2540.602 INSTALL SALVAGED MAILBOX 27 2554.602 PERMANENT BARRICADE 28 2564,5310_ INSTALL SIGN PANELS, TYPE C (INCLUDING POSTS & ASSEMBLY) 29 2564.531 INSTALL SALVAGED SIGN 30 2564.533 FURNISH SIGN PANELS, TYPE C 31 2582.502 4" SOLID DOUBLE LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 32 2582.502 4" SOLID LINE VVHITE - EPDXY 33 2552 502 4" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY 34 2552,502 4" BROKEN LINE YELLOW. EXPDXY 35 2552 502 24" SOLID LINE YELLOW - EPDXY SUBTOTAL TOTAL BASE BID QUANTITY 2 2 2 85 326 120 126 61 226 6 6 94 2 16.2 UNIT EA EA EA LF LF LF LF LF LF EA EA CY CY 213 LF 6 EA 19710 SY 18 EA 20 EA *DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINCER CONSTRUCTION UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT 787.00 $ 1,574.00 840.00 1,680,00 1,100.00 $ 2,200.00 21.00 $ 1,785.00 38.00 $ 12,386.00 41.00 $ 4,920.00 32 00 $ 4,032.00 34.00 $ 2,074.00 38.00 $ 8,588.00 1,975.00 $ 11,850,00 930.00 $ 5,580.0D 74.00 $ 6,970.80 80,00 $ 1,296,00 $ 90,038,90 3.00 60.00 $ 2.0D $ 28 00 45.0D 9 EA $ 28.00 19252 CY $ 7.00 8527 CY $ 12,50 300 SY $ 2.00 100 CY 65 RS $ 175.00 7534 'TN ; $ 11.75 1044 GA $ 2.50 1867 TN $ 60,00 115 TN $ 100.00 3111 TN $ 60.00 6 EA $ 230.00 6083 LF $ 6.40 $ 26 EA 1 $ 120.00 $ 10 EA $ 170.00 $ 1,700.00 12650 LF i 5 8,90 $ 112,585.00 1 EA $ 330.00 $ 330.00 38 EA 5 55.00 $ 2,090.00 82 SY $ 48,00 $ 3.936.00 8 SF $ 38.00 $ 304.00 20 EA $ 80,00 1 $ 1,600.00 1 EA $ 275.00 1 $ 275.00 18 EA $ 55.00 I $ 990.00 9 EA $ 55.00 1 $ 495.00 117.00 SF $ 25.00 ! $ 2,925,00 4720 LF 5 0.50 ! $ 2,360,00 12240 LF $ 0.25 $ 3,060.00 755 LF $ 0.25 I $ 188.75 1265 LE $ 0.25 $ 316.25 25 LF $ 4.80 ; $ 120.00 $ 875,422.20_ $ 1,727,988.59 DRESEL CONTRACTING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 500 00 $ 1,000 00 $ 500.00 $ 1,000 00 $ 725 00 $ 1,450.00 639.00 5 360,00 $ $ 39,420,00 $ 504,00 $ 900.00 $ 252.00 $ $ 134,764.00 $ $ 106,587.50 $ 600,00 S 20.00 $ 2,000.00 5 5 11.375,00 5 $ 88,524.50 $ $ 2,610,00 ; 5 $ 112,020.00 - S $ 11,500.00 , $ 186,660.00 $ $ 1,380.00 - 5 38,931,20 $ 3,120,00 $ $ $ 5 $ 5 18 S 5 $ TKDA R L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT $ 700 00 $ i,400 00 $ 1,000 00 ; $ 2,000 00 $ 1,400 00 j $ 2.800 00 25 00 $ 2,125 00 ; 5 20.00 1 $ 22.00 $ 30 00 $ 22.00 $ 30.00 $ 32.00 $ 2,250 00 $ 4,500.00 5 125.00 $ 105.00 $ 7,172.00 $ 38.00 $ 3,600.00 1S 40.00 $ 2,772,00 i 5 32.00 $ 1,830 00 1 $ 34.00 $ 7,232.00 $ 38,00 $ 13.500,00 5 2,400.00 $ 27,000.00 $ 2,000.00 $ 11,775.00 $ 62,00 ; $ 2,673 00 $ 62,00 1 $ 118,649.00 $ 1,700.00 12,388.00 4,800 00 4,032.00 2,074.00 8,588 00 14.400,00 12.000 00 5,840.40 1,004.40 101,678.80 3.00 $ 639.00 $ 4.00 1 $ 852,00 100.00 $ 600,00 $ 200.00 : S 1,200.00 2.00 $ 39,420.00 $ 2.50 . S 49.275,00 25.00 $ 450.00 ( $ 50.00 . $ 900.00 40,00 $ 800,00 $ 25.00 1 5 500.00 30.00 $ 270 00 1 $ 50.00 -, S 450.00 7.00 $ 134,764.00 i $ 7.50 1 5 144,390.00 9.50 $ 81,006.50 j $ 16.00 ! $ 136,432.00 2.00 $ 600.00 1 $ 4.00 i S 1,200.00 15.00 5 1,500.00 1 $ 15,00 $ 1,500.00 100.00 $ 6,500.00 1 $ 100.00 $ 6,500,00 12.00 $ 90.408.00 , 1 $ 15.50 $ 116,777,00 2.35 $ 2,453.40 1 $ 2.50 $ 2,610 00 1 55,00 $ 102,685.00 1 $ 57,50 $ 107,352.50 1 92.00 1 $ 10,580.0D 1 $ 95.00 $ 10,925,00 1 . 55.00 1 $ 171,105.00 1 $ 57,50 1 $ 178,882.50 1 150,00 1 $ 900.00 1 $ 200.00 1 $ 1,200.00 I 10,00 I $ 60,830.00 I $ 8.00 1 $ 48,664.00 60 00 $ 1.560.00 1 $ 250.00 ! $ 6,500 00 100.00 $ 1,000,00 I $ 250,00 ! $ 2,500.00 8.25 $ 104.362.50 I $ 8.75 l $ 110,687,50 400.00 $ 400.00 1 ; $ 500.00 i $ 500.00 30.00 $ 1,140.00 $ 0.00 i $ 225.00 39.00 $ 3,198.00 $ 42.00 ! $ 3,444.00 47,00 $ 376.00 $ 40.00 $ 320.00 80.00 $ 1,600.00 : $ 40.00 S 800,00 260.00 $ 260.00 $ 250.00 S 250.00 65.00 $ 1,170,00 $ 125.00 $ 2,250.00 60.00 $ 540.00 $ 100.00 $ 900.00 25.00 $ 2,925.0D $ 16.00 $ 1,872,00 0.45 $ 2.124.00 $ 0.65 $ 3,068,00 0.22 $ 2,692.80 $ 0.35 $ 4,284.00 0.23 1 $ 173.65 $ 0.35 $ 264 25 0.23 1 $ 290.95 - $ 0.10 $ 126.50 5.00 I $ 125.00 $ 16.00 $ 400.00 1 $ , 829,448.80 : $ 948,004.25 I $ 1,745,044,45 i 1 $ 1,824,911,55 Page 8 KEATS AVENUE MSA STREET AND VVATERMAINI(v1PROVEMENTS CITY OF LAKE ELMO. MINNESOTA TKDA PROJECT NO. 15230.000 MUNICIPAL STATE AID PROJECT NUMBER 206-105-002 BIDS OPENED: APRIL 9, 2013, AT 2:00 PM 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION ITEM MN/DOT NO. NO. DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT ALTERNATE NO. 1 1 2504,602 DEDUCT 12" WATERMAIN OFFSET 2 2504.502 16" WATERMAIN OFFSET 3 2504.602 DEDUCT 12" GATE VALVE & BOX 4 2504,602 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 5 2504.603 DEDUCT 12" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 6 2504,603 16" DIP CL. 52 WATERMAIN 7 2504.603 DEDUCT 12" HOPE DR, 1(DIPS), BY FIDD 8 2504.603 16" HDPE DR. 11(DIPS), BY HDD 9 2504.608 DEDUCT 12" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS 10 2504.608 16" MJ DIP COMPACT FITTINGS SUBTOTAL GRAND TOTAL WITH ALTERNATE NO. 1 2 2 13 13 5915 5915 2435 2435 3200 5438 EA $ (3,200.00) $ (6,400,00) EA $ 4.500.00 $ 9,000.00 EA $ (3,001.33) 5 (39,017.29) EA $ 2,952.38 $ 38,380,94 LF $ (48 00) $ (283,920.00) LF $ 61,50 $ 363,772.50 LF $ (54,00) $ (131,490.00) LF I $ 82,00 $ 199,670.00 EA 5 (7.80) $ (24,960.00) EA I $ 6,75 $ 36,706,50 $ 161,742.65 I $ 1,889,731.24 1 TKDA 'DENOTES ERROR IN BIDDERS CALCULATION MINGER CONSTRUCTION DRESEL CONTRACTING R. L. LARSON EXCAVATING UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL UNIT TOTAL PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT PRICE AMOUNT $ (3,450.00) $ (6,900.00) $ (6,000.00). $ (12,000.00)j $ 5,000.00 $ 10,000.00 5 8,500.00 5 17,000.00 $ (3,500.00) $ (45,500.00) _ 5 (2,750.00) 5 (35,750.00) $ 5,250.00 $ 68,250.00 $ 2,750.00 $ 35,750,00 5 (40.00) $ (236,600.00) 5 (42.00) $ (248,430.00) 56,00 $ 331,240.00 5 56.00 $ 331,240.00 $ (53.00) $ (129,055.00) 5 (52.00)1 $ (126,620.00) $ : 73.00 $ 177,755.00 5 85.00 5 206,975.00 (3.85) 5 (12,320.00) (4.50) $ (14,400.00/ 4.50 $ 24,471.00 5.50 $ 29,909,00 $ 181,341.00 163,674.00 $ 1,926,385.45 $ 2,008,585,55 Page 9 PROJECT SCHEDULE ENGINEERING, inc. CamGeheren P.E, Jack Griffin, P.E. Ryan &empskiP.[. [had |sakson, P.E. Project Title: Keats MSAStreet and Trunk VVatenna/n Improvements Client: City ofLake E|nop Project No.: I012.129 Date: Revised April 9, 2013 651.300.4261 651.300.4264 651.300.4267 651.300A283 October Z,2OIZ Improvement Hearing. Council authorizes the preparation ofPlans and Specifications. November 7,20l3 Council approves selection ofEngineering Consultant for design services. December llIO1I Workshop onTrunk VVaternlainLateral Benefit Assessments. March 5,2Ol3 City Engineer presents Plans and Specifications for Council approval. April 9,2Ol3 Receive Contractor Bids. April 16,ZDl3 City Council accepts bids and awards Contract. May Z7,ZOl3 Issue Notice toProceed, Contractor begins Work. August 3[\IO13 Substantial Completion date for Work [includes paving and restorationl. October 4,2Ol3 Final Completion date for Work [including all punch list itennsl. I'l 11 ( T1 KE ELMO MAYOR AND COUNC DATE: REGULAR ITEM #: MOTION COMMUNICATION 04/16/2013 17 AGENDA ITEM: Authorization to Distribute an Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the Lennar Residential Development (Savona) SUBMITTED BY: THROUGH: REVIEWED BY: Nick Johnson, City Planner Dean A. Zuleger, City Administrator Kyle Klatt, Planning Director SUGGESTED ORDER OF BUSINESS: Introduction of Item Staff Report/Presentation............................ ....... ..... ................. ...... ........ ........... ....... Staff Questions from Council to Staff ........ ........ ....... ..... ...... ..... Mayor Facilitates Public Input, if Appropriate. ....... ........................ ...... ..... ........ Mayor Facilitates Call for Motion R. City Council Discussion ........ .................. ..... ....... ........... ......... ............. .......... ...Mayor & City Council Action on Motion.... ....... ................ ......... ..... Mayor Facilitates PUBLIC POLICY STATEMENT The City Council must decide whether or not to authorize a mandatory Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for distribution and publication in the EQB Monitor FISCAL IMPACT: None — Westwood Engineering, working under the direction of Lennar Corporation, is preparing the EAW. Staff has been involved in reviewing the work of the developer's consultant. SUMMARY AND ACTION REOUESTED: The City Council is being asked to authorize distribution of the Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) that has been prepared for the proposed Lennar Corporation residential subdivision (Savona) located within the 1-94 Corridor planning area and immediately west of Keats Avenue. The City Council has previously determined that an EAW is required for the proposed Lennar residential subdivision and that this document should be prepared under the direction of the City of Lake Elmo acting as the RGU (Responsible Governing Unit). Staff recommends the City Council authorize distribution of the mandatory EAW starting the 30-day EAW public comment period and take the following_ action / with the following motion: "Motion to authorize distribution of the mandator' EAW for the Savona residential subdivision starting the 30-day EAW public comment period." BACKGROUND INFORMATION: Lennar's project engineer, Westwood Engineering, has prepared the attached EAW and related traffic study in accordance with the guidelines of the Minnesota Environmental Quality Board, which is the organization that oversees the State's environmental review program. Staff has reviewed the document and any requested modifications to the draft document have been incorporated into the attached EAW materials. Under State rules, an EAW must be published in the EQB Monitor as part of the review process. The EQB Monitor is a biweekly publication that announces environmental review documents, public comment periods, and other actions of the Environmental Quality Board. Once published in the EQB Monitor, there is a 30 day comment period during which public agencies and members of the public may comment on the proposed project. The City must further distribute the EAW to a mailing list containing all responsible parties required to receive a copy of an EAW or EIS. At the end of the 30-day comment period, the City must adopt a resolution that finds an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is or is not required for the project. If an EIS is not found to be necessary, the environmental review process is complete and the developer can proceed with platting and development within the project area. In this case, Lennar has already submitted a preliminary plat application for the Savona Subdivision and recognizes that the City will not be able to take formal action on the plat application until the environmental review is complete. The preliminary plat application may proceed simultaneously with the EAW review. STAFF REPORT: Staff has reviewed the EAW document and has worked with the developer's consultant to incorporate all requested changes into the attached worksheet. During the course of the review, it was determined that a traffic impact study would be required, and this study has also been prepared and is attached for consideration by the City Council. Staff has found that the EAW is complete and addresses the minimum requirements for submission to the EQB. Should the City Council take action to authorize the distribution of the EAW, the document could be published in the April 29`11 edition of the EQB Monitor, with the 30-day comment period ending on May 30, 2013. STAFF REcc...OMENDATION; Based upon the above background information and Staff report it is recommended that the City Council authorize distribution of the mandatory EAW starting the 30-day EAW public comment period with the following motion: "Motion to authorize distribution of the mandatory EA Wfor the Savona residential subdivision starting the 30-day EAW public comment period." ATTACHMENTS: 1. Environmental Assessment Worksheet — Savona EAW 2. Traffic Impact Study — Savona EAW ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT WORKSHEET Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota April 3, 2013 Prepared For: Lennar 16305 36th Ave. N., Suite 600 Plymouth, MN 55446 Prepared By: This page intentionally left blank. '�� �������0������������7[��d����|���7� `^` ~ �"�~^^`^`^��^,~'°�� ' �`"^^"�^,^,^`""�^.^ ~ ~ ~,"�"�^^^°^�^�" (EA avo a CONTENTS ListofExbibdu--.................... ----.---....... —..... ..... ............. --............ ... ........ ii List of Appendices ...... ..... ___ ....... ----...... ____ ........ ....... --------...... ----'ii \, Project Title .................... .............. ........ ____ .... —...... .......... .................................. —| 3. DGU--............... ...... ... —..... ......... ....... .......... —.... ___ ............ —........ —....... ........ ) 4. Reason for EAlVPreparation ........ --......... ............................... —......... ...... ----| 5. Project Location ...... —................... ........... ...... ......................... —................... ----�l h, knn---...... --....... .... ........ ........ ...... —.... ...... '.... --....... ----....... .2 7� Project Magnitude Data ........... ..................... .......... ........... .............. ---------] & Pen -nits and Approvals Required ... -----.-------....... .......... --................ —4 9. Land Use ........ —............. ................. --........... ................. ........ .................................. .5 10. Cover Types ............ ...... ..... ___ ........... --......................... ............ ...... -----...... M ||. Fish, Wildlife, and EcologicallySensitive Reaou,cco--............ ............. -----....... 8 12. PhysicalImpacts noWater Resources ---................ .... ..... .......... ............ ....... .... l0 |I Water Use ...................... —....... ...... ................... ........... -----...... ...... ---..... ll 14. Water -Related Land Use MonuyenncotDistrict .............................. ...... --.......... —.... l2 15. Water Surface Use .............. ............ ...... ............................................................. ........ lZ 16. Erosion and Sedimentation_ .......... -----.............. —...... ...... —................... ___ |2 IT Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff ..... .................... .................. .—......... ...... .......... ]3 18. Water Quality: Wastewaters .................... ___ ............ ................... —.............. —... —... |5 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions ........ ...... .... ... .......... ........................ ............. l0 20i Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, and Storage Tanks .......... ---............................... |9 21. TrnOlc--... -------...... ___ ............................... ........................ ........................ 20 22. Vehicle -Related Air Emissions ....................... ..................... —........................................ 23 23� Stationary Source Air Endooiono—.................................. ... ....... .... ..... ............ ....... 2] 24. Odors, Noise and IJux—...... ........... ....... ............................. ---........... ................ Z3 2lNearby Re000,cnu'.... ............... ........ —.......................................... ....... ........ —..... 24 26. Visual knnoots--.................................... —....... ----......... .................................... 25 27. Compatibilitywith Plans and Land Use —... —.................. ----........... _25 28, Impact ouInfrastructure and Public Services ?5 29� Cumulative Impacts .............. ........................... ....................... ---....... —......... .26 30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts ................. ......... ---........ —_--....... —]6 8.1 Permits and Approvals Required. ................... ............. '.............. --...... ................ 4 10.1 Estimated Before and After Cover Types .... ............................... --...... ................ 8 10.1 Wastewater Production Predicted ....... —.......... ............ ................................ —.... l5 19.1 Soils C|aunficudon.--.............................. ...... --- ...................... —.......... ........ ....... l7 21.1 Trip Generation 5ununary---........ ........... .............. ----...... ......... ----'2\ EXHIBITS SiteLuowduo—.... ...... --------------.------------------.--...... { 0SGSTopography ...... ---'—......... ------....... —...... —........................ ------2 ProposedSite Ybn... ........... ....... --- ...... --------......... .-----------'----3 Adjacent Land Use ..... —.... ..... --- .......... ............ ------...... --------....... —.—.4 CoverType Mapping ........ .... —... ...... ......... ----------.--........ ............... --.-..5 ZoningMan --- .... ........ -----.---...... ....... —.......... ---_--........ --- ..... —h Water Resources Mapping -----..-----------------------------7 SoilsMapping ..... -... ... —.......... —................... ................ ......... -----....... ... ........... 0 APPENDICES ljcadhTest Pit Location Mun... ----------...... ....... ....... ....... ...... —.... .... ...... A DN}lNatural Heritage Database Search ............... ----------...... —......... ............ ... D County Well Index Well Log ..... —......... ---...... ------......... —...... ......... --- ........... [ State Historic yroacn/u1iouOffice Correspondence ----------------------I) TrafficImpact Study. ....................... ..... ................... ....... .......... ---- ..... ......... ... ......... E ii Version lOMrev ,NVIRONMENTAL SSESSMENT ORKSHEET (EA VO Note to preparers: This form and EAW Guidelines are available at the Environmental Quality Board's website at: The Environmental Assessment Worksheet provides information about a project that may have the potential for significant environmental effects, The EAW is prepared by the Responsible Governmental Unit or its agents to determine whether an Environmental Impact Statement should be prepared. The project proposer must supply any reasonably accessible data for — but should not complete the final worksheet. The complete question as ‘vell as the answer must he included lithe EAW is prepared electronically. Note to reviewers: Comments must be submitted to the RGU during the 30-day comment period following notice of the EAW in the EQB iivniror. Comments should address the accuracy and completeness of information, potential impacts that warrant further investigation and the need for an EIS. 1. Project Title: 2. Proposer: Contact person: Title: Address: Phone: Fax: E-mail Savona EAW Lennar Joe Jablonski Development Area Manager 16305 36th Ave. N, Ste. 600 Plymouth, MN 55446-427() (952) 249-3014 NA joe.jab1onksiI ennar.com 4. Reason for EAW Preparation 3. RGU: Contact person: Title: Address: Phone: Fax: E mail City of Lake Elmo Kyle Klatt Planning Director 3800 Laverne Ave. North Lake Elmo, MN 55042 (651) 747-3911 (651) 747-3901 kklatt@lakeelmo.org 0 EIS Scoping RI Mandatory EAW 0 Citizen Petition 0 RGU Discretion 0 Proposer Volunteered If EAW or EIS is mandatory give EQB rule category subpart numbers(s) Part 4410.4300 Subp. 19.D., Residential Development 5. Project Location County: Washington County, Minnesota City: Lake Elmo Twp: T29N. R21W. S34 GPS Coordinates: 44.954093,-92.913716 (Project Center) Tax Parcel Numbers: 34.029.21.41.0004; 34.029.21.42.0001; 34.029.21.34.0001: 34.029.21.34.0003; 34.029.21.31.0001 (All tax parcels within overall project site are listed.) Attach copies of each of the following to the EAW: • County map showing the general location of the project: See Exhibit 1. • U.S. Geological Survey 7.5 minute, 1:24,000 scale map indicating project boundaries (photocopy acceptable); See Exhibit 2. • Site plan showing all significant project and natural features. See Exhibit 3. Savona EAW April 3. 2013 6. Description a) Provide a project slummy 0'50 words or /ess to be published in the EOB 21.10100r The Savona residential development is proposed on approximately 112.5 acres of primarily agricultural land in the southern portion of Lake Elmo. The project is proposing 190 single-family lots, and 122 multi -family lots. Twenty-seven acres of open space is also planned, which will include buffers, parks, woods and ponds. Give a complete description of the proposed project and related new COnSITLIC11011. Attach additional sheets as necessary. Emphasize construction, operation methods, and features that will cause physical manipulation of the environment or will produce wastes. Include modifications to existing equipment or industrial processes and significant demolition, removal, or remodeling alexisfing slructures. Indicate the timing and duration of cohlslriiactivities. Lennar is proposing construction of a single and M ulti- fa mily residential development on approximately 112.5 acres of land.. The two parcels that constitute the project are referred to as the Dale (west) and Frandsen (east) Properties, and are approximately 72.5 and 40 acres in size, respectively, The proposed project is located in the S1/4 of Section 34, T29N, R21W, City of Lake Elmo, Washington County, Minnesota (Exhibits 1 & 2), and is generally located south of 10'1' Street North (CSAH 10) and west of Keats Avenue North (CSAH 19). Project development will convert approximately 112.5 acres of agricultural fields, woodlands, and constructed ponds to streets, homes, lawns, landscaping, parkland, trails, and storniwater ponding. Land use within the site will include construction ofup to 190 single-family lots, and 122 multi- family townhome units. Development plans feature 65 to 75-foot wide single-family lots and 28 foot -wide residential streets. The proposed project will have an overall net density of 4.0 units per acre. Potential adverse effects on the environment will be mitigated by preserving and creating approximately 27 acres of open space in the form of buffers, parks, woodlands, and ponds. The project proposes extensive landscaping, buffering, and benning along adjacent roadways to offset possible visual impacts. Each residential lot will be served by City of Lake Elmo sanitary sewer and water systems. No onsite sewage systems and no private wells are proposed. Public streets will service the development including the construction of a minor collector roadway to serve the development, directing traffic east to Keats Avenue for convenient access to the 1-94 con-idor. The Metropolitan Council recently approved an amendment to the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Laud Use Plan. Under the amended plan, the city agreed to provide an additional 6,600 Residential Equivalent Connections (RECs) of regional sewer service by 2030. In a 2005 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the Metropolitan Council, the city agreed to meet or exceed an average residential density of three units per acre in sewered areas south of 1011' Street. Sewered development will be limited to the city's Village area (area surrounding the historic Lake Elmo Village) and the area south of 10th Street along Interstate 94. The proposed development of the study area is consistent with the total level of density guided by the MOU and Land Use Plan. The City of Lake Elmo 1-94 Corridor Development Staging Plan map (July 2012) indicates that the project area falls within the Stage 1 area. While a specific time period has not been attached to these stages, the stages are intended to develop in numeric order from Stage 1 to Stage III. Stage 1 represents new sewered development located west of Keats Avenue that will connect to the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) Woodbury, Oakdale, Northdale and East Oakdale (WONE) interceptor. Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Construction It is anticipated that the project will be constructed in six phases, with the first phase expected to begin in 2013. Full build -out is anticipated in 2018; however, construction timing will ultimately depend upon market conditions. It is anticipated that construction will entail moving approximately 750,000 cubic yards of soil. Construction dewatering may be conducted on an as -needed and perniitted basis to install sanitary sewer, municipal water, and storm sewer. Best Management Practices will be implemented during and after construction to protect water quality and reduce the potential for soil erosion and sedimentation. c) Explain the project purpose; if the project be car-ried out by a governmental unit, explain the need lb/. the project and identiti- its beneficiaries. The purpose of the Savona residential development project is to meet the demand for additional residential housing units within the City of Lake Elmo in accordance with the signed 2005 MOU between the City and the Metropolitan Council. Under this MOU, the City of Lake Elmo committed to adding 6,600 new RECs of regional sewer service by the year 2030. The city also committed to a city-wide population of 24,000 by the year 2030. This project will help meet the city's obligations as outlined within the MOU by providing an additional 312 living units along the 1-94 corridor. The project will be constructed and implemented by Lennar, a private developer. d) .4 re litture stages of this development planned or likely to happen? 0 Yes LiVo, lrves. briefly describe future stages, relationship to the present project, timeline, and plans for environmental review. There are currently no planned future stages of the Lake Elmo Property residential development project. 0) Is the project a subsequent stage of an earlier project? 0 Yes 0 No. Ilyes, hi -icily describe the past development, timeline, and any past environmental review. The Savona residential development project is not a subsequent stage of an earlier development project. 7. Project Magnitude Data Total Project Acreage: 112.5 Maximum Units per Number of Residential Units: Unattached 190 Attached 122 Building N/A Commercial. Industrial. or Institutional Building. Area (gross floor space): total square feet N/A Indicate area of specific uses (in square feet): Retail/Office N/A Other Industrial N/A Warehouse N/A Institutional N/A Light Industrial N/A Agricultural N/A Manufacturing N!A Other Commercial (specify) N/A Building Height 1-2 stories: 35maximum. Savona EAW April 3. 2013 If over 2 stories, compare to heights of nearby buildings N/A 8. Permits and Approvals Required List all known local„state, and federal permits. approvals. and financial assistance for the project. Include modifications of any existing pennits. gorenimental i*eview qfplans, and all direct and indirect.fOrms ofpublie financial assistance including bond guarantees. Tax hicrement Financing. and infrastructure. All of' these final decisions are prohibited until all appropriate environmental review has been completed. See Minnesota Rules. Chapter 4410.3100. Table 8.1. Permits and Approvals Required Unit of Government City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elino City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo City of Lake Elmo Washington County Washington County Washington County Washington County Metropolitan Council Minnesota Department of Health Minnesota DNR Division of Waters Minnesota Pollution Control Agency Minnesota Pollution Control Agency U. S. Army Corps of Engineers MN DNR Division of Waters MN Pollution Control Agency Type of Application Status Concept Plan Approval Preliminary Plat Approval Final Plat Approval EAW Negative Declaration Grading Pennit Building Permit Municipal Water Connection Permit Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit Rezoning Wetland Delineation Confirmation Wetland Conservation Act No -Loss Determination Right -of -Way Permit Access Pennit Obstruction Pennit Transportation Permit Sanitary Sewer Connection Permit Water Main Extension Approval Water Appropriation Permit NPDES/SDS Sanitary Sewer Extension Approval Section 404/Letter of No Jurisdiction Water Appropriation Permit(s) NPDES/SDS General Permit 4 Completed To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) Applied for Applied for To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for To be applied for To be applied for (if needed) To be applied for To be applied for Applied for To be applied for if needed Covered under genera] pennit; submit NO1 prior to Savona EAW Valley Branch Watershed District South Washington Watershed District 9. Land Use construction. Watershed Review/Permit To be applied for Watershed Review/Pennit To be applied for April 3, 2013 Describe current and recent past land use and development on the silo and on adjacent lands. Discuss the compatibility of the project with adjacent and nearby land uses. Indicate whether any potential conflicts envirmndental Identiji- any potential environmental hazard chic to pas.t site uses, such as soil contamination or abandoned storage tanks, or proximity to nearby hazardous liquid or gas pipelines. Existing Land Use within the Project Site Existing land use within, and adjacent to, the project site is depicted in Exhibit 4 and summarized in Section 10 below. A Phase 1 Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was conducted on the project area in October 2012 by Liesch Associates, Inc. (Liesch). The report indicates that according to historic aerial photography dating from 1936 to 2008, the Dale Property has been under agricultural production since at least 1936. Recent aerial photography (2008) indicates the Dale Property remains under agricultural use; the Frandsen parcel was converted to a golf practice facility, Mulligan Masters, on or around 2002. The golf business is no longer in operation. No farmsteads or buildings are currently located on the property aside for a small plastic storage shed on the Frandsen parcel. A transmission line extends along the northern project boundary, and Liesch observed a gas pipeline on the Frandsen Parcel. The site currently contains 61.2 acres of cropped field, 1.4 acres of developed area/roads, 33.5 acres of golf course driving range, 9.4 acres of upland meadow, 1.8 acres of excavated pond, and 5.2 acres of upland woodland (Exhibit 5). Compatibility with Adjacent and Nearby Land Uses The Lake Elmo Zoning Map is provided on Exhibit 6. The Dale property is currently zoned FID- RR-SRD, which is Rural Residential Sewered Residential Holding District. The Frandsen property is currently zoned HD-A-SRD, which is Agricultural Sewered Residential Holding 'District. Both parcels are planned and staged for sewered residential development, but will require rezoning to Urban Low Density Residential (LDR) and Urban Medium Density Residential (MDR) prior to project approvals. The properties are located within the 1-94 development corridor, which is one of two focused locations within the city for future housing expansion and increased housing density. This will allow existing open space within the rural planning districts of Lake Elmo to be maintained, along with the overall rural flavor of the city. The project is compatible with adjacent and nearby land uses. Surrounding land use Exhibit 4) is primarily residential development to the north/northwest, gravel mining to the north/northeast, agricultural land and Keats Avenue to the east, the 1-94 corridor to the south, small businesses to the southwest, and agricultural land and a business park to the west. The proposed project will fit into the 1-94 construction corridor as a separate but similar land use to existing land uses in the area. As described in the amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan, this portion of the city is guided as an "urbanized zone" that will feature higher density residential development and commercial uses. The proposed project is consistent with the land use guidance. Natural buffer strips, located adjacent to 5 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 existing rural development, are proposed along the periphery of the Savona residential development to provide a transition zone between the new project and existing land uses in the area. Environmental Hazards Associated with Past Land Use Prior to 2002, the project site was undeveloped and used for agricultural crop production. In 2002, the Frandsen portion ofthe property (eastern 40 acres) was converted to a golf practice facility, Mulligan Masters. A search on the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency's Web site (What's In My NeighborhoodT) revealed no known potential sources of soil or groundwater contamination. This database contains properties that have already been investigated and cleaned up through federal and state cleanup programs, as well as those currently enrolled in MPCA cleanup progams. The database also includes properties that were thought to be contaminated, but after further investigations were determined to be clean. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment A Phase I Environmental Site Assessment completed by Liesch revealed no recognized environmental conditions (RECs) on the properties except for seven observed areas containing evidence of dumping, and surficial debris including: appliances, quart -sized oil containers (empty), metal debris/pieces, rusted drums, plastic containers, crushed PVC pipe, a couch, mattresses, televisions, tires, wood scrap/debris, a chiller unit, glass containers, asphalt piles, soil piles, concrete piles, drain tile, plastic posts, and trash. Liesch's report indicated that "although the drums and containers Were empty. and no obvious staining Has observed in the vicinity oldie containers, there is potential that the original contents of the containers may have impacted the Property subsurface. The potential for subsurface impacts from the appliances, televisions, and drums and containers observed...is considered a REC. As a result, Liesch recommended a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment to assess the dump areas identified during the Phase I ESA, and indicated that "debris should he managed and disposed of properly accord* to City. County, and State regulations. - In addition to the dump areas, Liesch observed the following items of environmental note: • An irrigation well located on the Frandsen Parcel, Liesch recommended that the well be sealed according to the Minnesota Department of Health well code if it is no longer in use. The well is located in a Special Well Construction Area as identified by the MPCA. • A septic system with a drain field is present on the Frandsen Parcel. but is no longer in use. Liesch recommended that the septic system be removed / abandoned according to local code requireinents. • Suspect asbestos -containing material (ACM) was not observed on the Property during the site walk -over. However, suspect ACM may be present among debris observed on the Property. Phase II Environmental Site Assessment A Phase II ESA was completed for the site as recommended during the Phase 1 process. Based upon the environmental conditions noted, Liesch completed the following scope of services as part of the subsurface Phase II ESA: (1) prepared a health and safety plan and cleared public and private utilities, (2) excavated 17 test pits throughout areas A, C, and D on the Property to assess for buried 6 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 debris and potential environmental impacts due to the presence of appliances, televisions, drums, and containers in these areas, (3) screened soil samples for the presence of organic vapors using a photoionization detector (PID) equipped with a 10.6 electron volt (eV) lamp, (4) collected five soil samples for laboratory analysis of diesel range organics (DRO) (analyzed by silica gel method), volatile organic compounds (VOCs), the eight Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) metals, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pesticides, (5) observed debris for suspect asbestos containing material (ACM), and (6) prepared a Phase 11 ESA report with conclusions and recommendations. Work performed for the Phase II ESA included observing and field screening recovered soil samples, and collection of soil samples for laboratory analysis from soil test pits. Based upon the findings of the Phase 11 ESA, Liesch confirmed that the debris observed on the Property is mainly surficial. The only areas of deeper debris included concrete in test pit TP-1 1 and asphalt pieces in test pit TP-12 to approximately 4 feet below grade. General municipal waste was observed to 1.5 feet below grade in test pits TP-15 and TP-16 and to 1 foot below grade in test pits TP-4 and TP-7. Liesch test pit locations are shown in Appendix A. In the RCRA metal analysis, arsenic concentrations were detected above the Residential SRV of 9 mg/kg ranging from 9.2 to 19.9 ing/kg. The Liesch Phase 11 report indicates that they suspect these concentrations to be within the range of naturally -occurring concentrations for this area. From a regulatory perspective, the MPCA Voluntary Investigation and Cleanup (VIC) Program has not required remedial efforts for arsenic concentrations just above the Residential SRV if the data supports background concentrations, This contention is supported by MPCA Fact Sheet: Best .Management Practices for the Off -Site Reuse of Excess Fill from Development Sites dated February 2012, in which the MPCA states that "'Naturally occurring concentrations of some metals, such as arsenic, selenium, or copper sometimes exceed the SRV or SLV. Such soils are not considered impacted in the absence of a contaminant source or other field or laboratory indications of contamination.- As noted above, the same assertion would be applicable to the selenium concentrations detected on the Property. The detection of DRO at 153 mg/kg in TP-15 (1') indicates the presence of low level petroleum impacts in the vicinity of TP-15. The extent and magnitude of the DRO impacted soil is unknown. Based upon the findings, Liesch recommended the following: Inform the Property owner of the release °CDR° as detected on the Property, and prepare a Construction Contingency Plan to detail management of debris and impacted soils during development. Lennar will prepare a Construction Contingency Plan for the site prior to site development to manage known debris and impacted soils within the project area. However, the primary areas where test borings were completed will be largely undisturbed in the final development plan (Appendix A). The northernmost area (Area A) is located within an existing transmission line easement, and will therefore be largely avoided. Areas C is predominantly located within a tree and open space preservation area, and about 50 percent of Area D will he preserved and avoided by the project design. Local Soil and Groundwater Contamination Perfluorochemical (PFC)-containing wastes were disposed of at two land disposal sites, the 3M- Oakdale Disposal Site in Oakdale and the former Washington County Landfill in Lake Elmo, Minnesota between 1956 and 1974. The Oakdale disposal site is located approximately 3.8 miles northwest of the project area, and the Washington County Landfill is located approximately 3.4 miles to the north. 7 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 PFCs were released from the two facilities resulting in contamination of groundwater and nearby drinking water wells as outlined in a Public Health Assessment prepared by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (August 29, 2008), and the Agency for Toxic Substance and Disease Registry (ATSDR). The Minnesota Department of Health (MDH) has detected PFCs in several surface waterbodies in the Lake Elmo, Oakdale, and Woodbury area through various sampling studies. Surface water bodies north of the project area that have been found to contain PFCs include: Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake, and Lake Elmo. PFCs are suspected to infiltrate into the groundwater from these water body sources. Sunfish Lake was found to contain perfluorobutanoate (PFBA). Goose Lake, located 0.25-miles north of the project area, was sampled by the MDH in 2010 and was found to contain no PFCs. According to this Public Health Assessment, PFCs have been detected in public and private wells across a wide area of Oakdale and Lake Eltno, In Lake Elmo, approximately 200 homes vere connected to municipal water to mitigate exposure to PFCs in the groundwater. Additional homes, approximately 55, have had in home granular activated carbon filter systems installed to mitigate exposure to PFCs in the groundwater. These homes have also been offered bottled drinking water. Groundwater monitoring of PFCs is an ongoing program. The proposed project will mitigate risks to new residents by providing access to municipal drinking water. 10. Cover Types Estimate the acreage of the site with each of the .following cover types belbre (111(1 a/ier development. Table 10.1. Estimated Before and After Cover Types Land Cover ..,„. Cropped field Developed/Road Golf Club/Driving Range Upland Meadow Excavated Pond Upland Woodland Stormwater ponds Totals Before (a 61.2 1.4 33.5 9.4 1.8 5.2 0.00 112.5 e After (acres 0.0 85.5 0.0 20.0 0.0 2.0 5.00 112.5 IfBefore and After totals are not equat explain win: Before and after totals are equal. 11. Fish, Wildlife, and Ecologically Sensitive Resources a) Identift fish and resources and habitats 011 (11" near the site and describe how they would be allecied bv the protect. Describe any measures re be taken to 11111111111fe or avoid impacts Fish and wildlife resources on and near the site are directly related to the composition, quality, size, and connectivity of natural communities including woodlands, wetlands, and grasslands. Westwood Professional Services, Inc. used aerial photography to map the existing cover types (Exhibit 5). Based on this analysis, the site contains four major habitat components: 61.2 acres of cropped field, 9.4 acres of upland meadow, 1.8 acres of excavated pond, and 5.2 acres of upland woodland. These Savona EAVV April 3, 2013 habitats are used by a variety of animals common to central Minnesota. Wildlife resources that exist throughout the site likely include those species that have adapted to open lands and cropland habitats such as pheasant, meadowlark, field sparrow, cottontail, red fox, and white-tailed deer, The open fields provide seasonal food and cover for these species. Project development is expected to convert approximately100 acres of cropped field, upland meadow, golf course/driving range, upland meadow, excavated pond, and upland woodland. Preservation of approximately 27 acres of upland woodland, upland meadow, and stonnwater ponding is expected to mitigate some of the adverse effects on wildlife. Connections between existing meadow/old field and woodlands will be maintained in the development by retaining buffer strips along the property edges, which will allow travel corridors to remain for use by wildlife on the property and from off -site resource areas. Conversion of agricultural fields, woodlands, and meadow/old field to residential development is expected to result in some local decline in wildlife abundance. Populations of species that depend upon cropland, woodland and fields, such as ring-necked pheasants, wild turkey, and meadowlarks, will likely be displaced. Migratory birds are expected to respond to the development by looking for alternative nesting sites upon their return from wintering habitats. Some songbirds that readily adapt to suburban habitats may become more numerous. Non -migratory species with small home ranges such as small mammals will experience more adverse effects. These species will compete with other individuals of the same or other species to claim territories in neighboring habitats or succumb to mortality during project construction. Approximately 24 percent of the 1 12.5-acre project area will be open space, which is expected to help mitigate adverse effects on wildlife. The project is not expected to result in a regionally significant decline in wildlife abundance or species diversity. Measures to reduce the effects on wildlife include preservation of buffers and adjacent woodland integrated with open space and parkland, and construction of stonnwater ponding. These measures are expected to provide additional habitat for wildlife and help mitigate adverse effects on some wildlife. b.) Are any siatc-Ii.sted (endangered, threatened, or special concern) species. rare plant communities or other sensitive ecological resources on or near the site? 0 Yes 0 NO Ifyes, describe the resource and how it would he affected by the project. Describe coty. measures that will be taken to minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Provide the license agreement number and/or Division of Ecological Resources contact number (#ERDB 20130158)from which the data were obtained and attach the response letterfrom the DNR Division of Ecological Resources. Indicate if anv additional sulTey work has been conducted within the she and describe the results. The Minnesota DNR Natural Heritage Program conducted a database search of the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS) to determine if there are listed plants and animals; native plant communities; wildlife aggregations; geological features; or state rare features that are known to occur within or near the project site. The database search did uot identify rare features within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed project. The DNR Natural Heritage Review response letter is provided in Appendix B. Based on the nature and location of the proposed project, the ,DNR concluded that it does not believe the project will negatively affect any known occurrences of rare features. Therefore, no additional survey work has been or is scheduled to be conducted on the project area, and no measures to avoid or minimize potential impacts appear warranted. 9 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 According to the Natural Communities and Rare Species of Washington County Map (Minnesota County Biological Survey, 1990), the project site does not contain rare plant or animal species or other significant natural features, 12. Physical Impacts on Water Resources Will the project involve the physical or hydrologic alteration --- dredgingjilling. stream diversion, ouffall structure, diking, and impoundment of any slay ace water ,voch as a lake, pond, wetland, stream or drainage ditch? LJ Yes 0 No If yes, identify water resource affected and give the DNR Public Waters Inventory number(s) if the water resources affected are on the P117: AT/A. Describe alternatives considered and proposed mitigation measures to minimize impacts The project will not involve the physical or hydrologic alteration of natural surface waters such as lakes, ponds, wetlands, or streams. On September 27, 2012, Arrowhead Environmental Consulting, Inc., (AEC) evaluated the project area for wetlands and other jurisdictional waters. No jurisdictional wetlands or waters were identified within the project boundary. Prior to delineating the site, the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Map (Lake Elmo Quad), the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MN DNR) Public Water Inventory Map (PW]), the Washington County Soil Survey Map, and the National Wetland Inventory (NWI) Map were reviewed, Historical images from 1936, 1953, 1957, 1964, 1991, 2000, 2003, and 2010 were also reviewed. The PWI map indicated no Public Water Wetlands are mapped on the property. The NWI map indicated several wetland basins within the property (PEMCd, PEM1C', PSS I C, PF01C, PUBFx) (Exhibit 7); a PEMC wetland was also mapped along the western property line; however, field review indicated it is located off of the property. According to the Washington County Soil Survey map, non-hydric soil is mapped throughout the property. AEC' reviewed the entire site and focused on four specific areas. Soil samples were collected in each of these areas and reviewed, but in each case the soils observed at the sample point locations were determined to be non-hydric, and no hydrology indicators were observed. Consequently, none of the areas examined met jurisdictional wetland criteria. The eastern portion of the review area was converted to a golf course in the early 2000's. Several "ponds" were created throughout the golf course; most of the ponds have rubber liners. AEC reviewed historical aerial photography to determine if the ponds were created in historical wetland areas. Based on the aerial analysis, it appears that none of the ponds were created in historical wetland. AEC submits that the pond areas should not be regulated as jurisdictional wetland as they were created in upland and have artificial bottoms (rubber liners). AEC reviewed an area in the agricultural field (just west of the golf course near the center of the review area, an area that is quite evident on 2010 aerial imagery. This area was a stockpile of coarse material (mostly sand and gravel) and was dominated by pigweed (Amaranthus) species. The area was determined by AEC not to meet jurisdictional wetland criteria. Due to the timing of late -season field work, findings have not been reviewed in the field by wetland regulatory agencies, and therefore have not been confirmed in writing by the Technical Evaluation Panel (TEP) for the project area, or the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The TEP and the U.S. Amoy Corps of Engineers will be invited to review and comment on the wetland delineation in spring 2013. 10 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 13. Water Use IN 11 the project involve installation or abandonment of' any water wells, connection to or clum,ges in any public water .vupply or appropriation of any ground or stuface ivater (including dewatering)? 0 Yes 0 No. lives, as applicable, give location and purpose new wells: public supply atiectcd. changes to he made. and water quantities to be used: the source, duration, quantity and pmpose of any appropriations; and unique well numbers and DNR appropriation permit numbers. if known, Identify any existing and HellWCIIS on the site map. If there are no wells known on the site. explain methodology used to determine. Abandonment of water wells No new water wells are planned for the project. The Minnesota Geological Survey's (MGS) County Well Index (CWI) indicates there is one registered well within the project site. According to the Phase !Environmental Assessment report, no municipal or private water wells were noted on the Property, except for an irrigation well located on the Frandsen Parcel (former golf practice range). According to Minnesota Department of Health well records for Unique Well No. 686580, this irrigation well is 300 feet deep and was installed in 2002 to irrigate the golf course facility (Appendix C). This well will be abandoned during construction. If any other active or inactive wells are discovered on the property, they will be field -located, abandoned, and sealed in accordance with Minnesota Department of Health regulations prior to site development. Connection to a public water supply system The City of Lake Elrno currently operates two wells, which are permitted under DNR Water Appropriations Pen -nit No. 611031. The two wells range in depth from 285 to 808 feet deep, and draw water from the Jordan -Mt. Simon and Prairie Du Chien -Jordan aquifers (2010 Drinking Water Report). The City's DNR water appropriations permit allows a total system pumping capacity of 260 million gallons per year (MGY). According to DNR Water Appropriation records as of 2010, the city reported pumping 103 MGY (average 282,192 gallons per day). The estimated water demand for the proposed development is 34.3 MGY (94,037 gallons per day) based on the assumption that consumption is approximately 110 percent of wastewater generation (see Item 18). Consequently, there are no water supply issues anticipated as a result of adding the development to the city's water supply system. According to the city engineer, water may be supplied to the development either through an existing services agreement with the City of Oakdale or via the Lake Elmo municipal water supply system. The current Comprehensive Plan calls for municipal water facilities to be extended from the southeast corner of the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Boulevard to service this portion of the city. Dewatering Dewatering will become necessary i F surficial groundwater is encountered during utility installation; however, it is unlikely that dewatering will be necessary because the depth to groundwater exceeds the planned depth of sanitary sewer, municipal water, and storm sewer in most areas within the study area. Based on data gathered from Unique Well No. 686580 upon installation in October 2002, static groundwater levels in the area are approximately 120 feet below trade. The quantity and duration of potential construction dewatering is not known at this time, but it is expected that any necessary dewatering for construction will be temporary. If groundwater is encountered during utility installation, it will be discharged to temporary sediment basins located within the project site. 11 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 If construction dewatering and pumping, from the proposed development exceeds the 10,000-gallon per day or 1,000,000 gallons per year thresholds, a DNR Water Appropriation Permit will be obtained. If it becomes apparent that construction dewatering will not exceed 50 million gallons in total and duration of one year from the start of pumping, the contractor or project proposer will apply to the DNR Division of Waters for coverage under the amended DNR General Permit 97-0005 for temporary water appropriations. It is not anticipated that construction dewatering or pumping from the proposed development will be extensive or continue long enough to impact domestic or municipal wells. 14. Water -Related Land Use Management District Does any part wak' project involve a shore/and :zoning district, u delineated 100-yew-flood plain, or a state or fiqlerally designated wild or scenic river hind use district? 0 Yes �No Ifrcs, identify the district and discuss project conymtibilitv with district land use restrictions. The project site is not located within a shoreland zoning district. The site is not within 1,000 feet of a Minnesota DNR Public waterbody or 300 feet of a Minnesota DNR Public Watercourse, which would trigger a shoreland zoning district. According to FEMA Floodplain mapping (2008 Update), the project is located within Flood Panel 27163C0335E; HUC 7010206. The entire project is identified as being outside of either a 100 or 500-year flood zone (Exhibit 7). The site is also not in or adjacent to any stale or federally -designated wild or scenic river land use zone, 15. Water Surface Use the project change the number 07ope ofwatercraft on any water bud'? 0 Yes 0 No Ifis, indicate the current and. projected watercraft usage and discuss any potential overcrowding or co with other uses. The project site does not encompass any surface waters that are used by watercraft. 16. Erosion and Sedimentation Give the acreage to he graded 07' excavated and the cubic yards of 'soil to he moved: Acres: Approximately 100 acres of 112.5 acres will be graded for streets, house pads, and stonnwater features. Cubic Yards: Approximately 750,000 cubic yards ofsoil will be moved. Describe any steep slopes or highly erodible soils and identifY them on the site map. Describe anv erosion and sedimentation control IlleaSIIICS 10 he rased during and after project construction. The Highly Erodible Land (HEL) List for Washington County, Minnesota (USDA NRCS, 2006) indicates there is one potentially highly erodible soil that covers approximately 23.7 acres in two areas within the study area (Exhibit 8). Chetek sandy loam (6-12 percent slopes) is located in the central portion of the western portion and in the southwest corner of the eastern portion of the property. According to the USDA NRCS SSURGO database for Washington County (Accessed 2013), steep slopes (12 percent or greater) may be associated with the one soil mentioned above. Contour Savona EA W April 3, 2013 mapping indicates that the majority of the surface topography is gently undulating. Elevations range from 1,078 feet in the northwestern portion of the site to 950 feet in the eastern portion of the site (Exhibit 2). The western portion of the site drains to the southwest, and the eastern portion drains east-northeast. With the majority of the project area being over 1,000 above mean sea level, the site contains some of the highest elevations in the city. Because the project will involve disturbance of more than one acre of land, application for coverage under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System/State Disposal System (NPDES/SDS) General Permit will he submitted to the MPCA prior to initiating earthwork on the site. This permit is required for discharge of stonnwater during construction activity and requires that Best Management Practices (BMPs) he used to control erosion, and that all erosion controls be inspected after each rainfall exceeding 0.5 inches in 24 hours. Erosion control practices that will be implemented on the site include: 1. Construction of temporary sediment basins in the locations proposed for stonnwater ponding. and development of these basins for permanent use following construction. 2. Silt fence and other erosion control features installed prior to initiation of earthwork and maintained until viable turf or ground cover is established on exposed areas. 3. Periodic street cleaning and installation of a rock construction entrance to reduce tracking of dirt onto public streets. 4. Stabilization of exposed soils, phased with grading, within 7 days for slopes steeper than 3:1, 14 days for slopes less than 3:1 but greater that 10:1, and 21 days for slopes flatter than 10:1. 5. Energy dissipation, such as riprap, installed at storm sewer outfalls. 6. Use of cover crops, native seed mixes, sod, and landscaping to stabilize exposed surface soils after final grading. Erosion control plans must be reviewed and accepted by the City of Lake Elmo and applicable watersheds prior to project construction. Because the above BMPs will be implemented during and after construction, potential adverse effects from construction -related sediment and erosion on water quality will he minimized. 17. Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff C0171pare the quantity and quality °Tyne runoff Indbre aiI dfter the project. Describe permanent controls to manage or treat runoff Describe any stormwater pollution prercmion plans. The project must meet the requirements of the city's Storm Water Ordinance. The project also must meet the requirements of the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts (e.g. infiltration, erosion), where applicable. The city's Storm Water Ordinance is available on the city's website. Lake Elmo is also a mandatory small MS4 (Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System) city, and is required by federal and state law to obtain and implement a NPDES Stonnwater pennit administered by the MPCA. MS4s are also required to develop and implement a storniwater pollution prevention plan program (SWPPP), and submit an annual report to the MPCA. 13 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Pre -Development Site Runoff Existing site runoff likely contains pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizer residues due to the presence of agricultural fields and the golf practice area. There is also likely a minor amount of runoff that flows to the site from Keats Avenue North. However, because the site contains some of the highest elevations in the city, runoff primarily drains away from the site to the southwest and east-northeast. It is expected that a portion of the runoff infiltrates into the site's permeable, silty and sandy soils (see Itein 19) and some likely reaches existing onsite stonnwater ponds located on the golf course practice area. Post -Development Site Runoff The change in land use will decrease the amount of agricultural chemicals and suspended solids, and increase other components typical of urban runoff. It is expected that the volume of runoffwill increase during significant storm events as a result of the increase in impervious surface area. It is anticipated that only extreme conditions such as those occurring in connection with 50- or 100-year storm events will result in measurable increases in runoff volume and associated pollutant transport. The preservation and creation of open space in the form abutters, parks, woodlands, and ponds will help to mitigate potential adverse effects from the increase in impervious surface. Runoff water quality will be typical of residential developments, and will likely be slightly degraded due to pollutants deposited on roads, roofs, and other impervious surfaces. Similar to current conditions, sediment, nutrient, and other pollutant removal will occur when much of the stonnwater filters through upland vegetation, vegetated drainage swales, stonnwater ponds, and other best management practices, including infiltration. Preserved and newly seeded vegetation will provide filter strips to help remove sediment and nutrients before runoff discharges to area wetlands and surface waters, mitigating potential effects on water quality. Potential adverse effects otrunoff volume and quality will be further mitigated by the construction of approximately 5.0 acres of stonnwater ponds, which will be designed to reduce peak runoff rates and meet all requirements of the City of Lake Elmo, and Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts. The design of ponding areas and the quality of stonnwater discharging from the development will meet the requirements of the MPCA General Stormwater Permit for Construction Activity (Minnesota Stormwater Manual, and applicable local regulations. In a storm event, stonnwater will he retained in the ponds and discharged at or below existing peak runoff rates. BMPs will be employed during construction to reduce erosion and sediment loading of stormwater runoff. Inspection and maintenance of BMPs during construction will be consistent with NPDES/SDS General Pennit requirements, including site inspection after rainfall events, penmeter sediment control maintenance, and sediment removal. b) routes and receiving water bocheslin- runoff:front the site: include major downstream water bodies as well as the immediate receivin€,, waters. Estimate impact runoff on the quality o 'receiving waters. According to available watershed district mapping, the project site is located within the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts (Exhibit 6). Surface waters generally flow east- northeast towards Lake Elmo, and southwest towards an unnamed creek which connects Armstrong Lake to Wilmes Lake. Because the site represents one of the highest locations in the city, the site does not receive directed runoff from off -site waterbodies such as Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake, or Lake Elmo, and there are no direct hydrologic connections to these waterbodies from the project site. 14 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 The goal of the project will be to maintain peak discharge rates at or below the existing condition. Post -construction drainage will follow similar pathways, with minor differences in drainage routes and increases in the volume of road ditches and swale flows. Post -development stormwater runoff will either travel overland, into stonnwater ponds, or through storm sewers prior to discharging to receiving waters. For the following reasons, it is anticipated that site development will have minimal effects on receiving water quality: • Preservation and creation of approximately 27 acres of buffers, parks, woodlands, and ponds (24 percent of the site). • Hydraulic storage within sediment basins will be designed, and BMPs implemented, in accordance with the General NPDES/SDS Pennit for Construction Activities to protect water quality and control erosion. 18. Water Quality: Wastewaters a) Describe sources, composition and quantities ofall sanitary, municipal and industrial wastewater produced or treated at the site. Only normal domestic wastewater production is expected from the project. The types of wastewater produced will be typical of new residential developments. No onsite municipal or industrial wastewater treatment is anticipated or planned. Both the MPCA and the Metropolitan Council Environmental Services (MCES) have compiled and documented extensive data that relates wastewater flow generation to population and land use. Sanitary wastewater production for the proposed development was estimated based on the methods outlined in the Service Availability Charge (SAC) Procedure Manual (MCES, 2012). The MCES has established 274 gallons per day (gpd) to be the average daily wastewater production from a typical residential connection. One SAC unit is defined as 274 gallons of wastewater flow volume, which is based on the assumption of 2.74 persons per unit and 100 gallons per capita day (gpcd) of wastewater production. Each single family residence and townhome was assigned one SAC unit. The estimated maximum potential daily wastewater production for the entire development is 85,488 gpd. The following table provides information on wastewater production based on land use. Proposed Use Table 18.1 Wastewater Production Predicted Wastewater SAC Rate Units SAC Units jgallons/day) Single Family Homes Townhomes 1/Unit 190 190 52,060 1/Unit 122 122 33,428 Total 312 85,488 15 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 17) Describe waste treatment methods or pollution prevention efforts and give estimates of composition after treatment. IdentilY receiving waters, including major downstream venter bodies (identifYing anv impaired waters), and estimate the disclunge impact On the qualloofreceiving waters. If the project inrolve,s. on -site S gC systems, discuss the suitability of site conditions fur such .systems. No on -site sanitary sewage treatment is proposed. c) wastes will be discharged into a publicly owned treatment facility, hien* the descri any pretreatment provisions. Cull discuss the.facility's ability to handle the volume caul composition of wastes, identifting anv improvements necessary. According to the city's approved Comprehensive Plan, the project area is situated within a designated sewer service area (see Future Land Use — Sewer Plan, 2012). Current plans call for the proposed development site to be served by municipal sewer extended from the southeast comer of the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Boulevard. All wastewater from the proposed project will be discharged to the Woodbury. Oakdale, Northdale, and East Oakdale (WONE) Interceptor. The amended Land Use Plan (2012) forecasts approximately 515 new households connecting to the WONE Interceptor by 2015, and an additional 1,235 households by 2020. From the WONE Interceptor, wastewater from the development would flow to the Metropolitan Wastewater Treatment Plant in St. Paul, Minnesota for treatment; the largest wastewater treatment facility in Minnesota. This facility currently treats approximately 215 million gallons of wastewater each day. and has the capacity to treat up to 250 million gallons per day. The Metropolitan Council projects ample capacity at this plant through 2030. Consequently, no wastewater facility or treatment capacity issues are anticipated (MCES 2007). 19. Geologic Hazards and Soil Conditions Amos-Mune depth (in feet) to groundwater: 0 minimum —150 average Approximate depth tin feet) to bedrock: —50 minimum —125 average Describe anv of the Jollowing geologic site hazards to ground water and also idol?* them on the site map: sinkholes, shallow limestonefoimatiom Or karst conditions. Describe measures to avoid or minimize environmental problems due to any of these hazards. Groundwater elevations within the vicinity of the site are around 875 feet above sea level based on The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5, Plate 5. Topographic mapping indicates that elevations on the site range from approximately 1,070 above mean sea level in the northwest comer of the site to 980 above mean sea level towards the eastern border of Ole site. Consequently, the maximum depth. to groundwater is estimated at about 195 feet. Because surficial groundwater is sometimes encountered in seasonally wet areas, the minimum depth to groundwater is estimated at 0 feet. The approximate average depth to groundwater was calculated by averaging the topographic elevations on the site (1,025) and subtracting the anticipated depth shown on the Washington County Atlas (875). Depth to bedrock was estimated from the record of Unique Well No. 686580 (County Well Index. 2012) (Appendix C). The well and boring record completed for this new well in October 2002 indicates that Prairie Du Chien bedrock was reached at a depth of 152 feet below grade. The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5, Plate 4 indicates that the distance to bedrock ranges between approximately 50 and 200 feet below grade. 16 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 h) Describe the soils on site, giving ArRCS (SCS) class groundwater contamination jinn wastes or chemic (Pleasures to prevent such contamination, A-nowm Discuss soil texture U1ldfOt(21/tiUIfOr r s filed onto the soils. Discuss any mitigation The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) C-5, Plate 1 indicates there are no known sinkholes, exposed bedrock, springs, or seeps on or near the site. If such features are encountered on the site, actions will be taken to mitigate potential effects such as storinwater routing, soil stabilization, and groundwater protection practices. Soil Classification The Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) digital database for Washington County (USDA NRCS, Accessed 2013).indicates the soils that occur within the project area (Exhibit 8) are classified as summarized in Table 19.1. Soils on the site are predominantly non-hydric silty and sandy loarns. Table 19.1. Soils Classification Map Symbol Soil Classification Hydric' 264 Freeon silt loam, 1 to 4 percent slopes Not hydric Prime Farmland2 153B Santiago silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Not hydric 153C Santiago silt loam, 6 to 15 percent slopes Not hydric 155C Chetek sandy loam, 6 to 12 percent slopes Not hydric 155D Chetek sandy loam, 12 to 25 percent slopes Not hydric 342B Kingsley sandy loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Not hydric 49B Antigo silt loam, 2 to 6 percent slopes Not hydric All areas are Prime Farmland All areas are Prime Farmland Farmland of Statewide importance Not Listed Not Listed All areas are Prime Farmland All areas are Prime Farmland 'Based on the NRCS List of Hydric Soils of Minnesota (1995). 2 Based on the USDA/NRCS Prime Farmland of Washington County, Minnesota (2002). A geotechnical subsurface investigation has been initiated. Results of the investigation will be published separately. Potential for Groundwater Contamination The Geologic Atlas of Washington County, Minnesota (1990) pollution sensitivity map indicates that the sensitivity of groundwater to pollution in the project areas is generally moderate. Sensitivity of groundwater systems to pollution is defined as the approximate time it takes from the moment a contaminant infiltrates the land surface until it reaches an aquifer. Although shallow groundwater is 17 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 highly susceptible to contamination, moderately permeable soils with finer textures will slow or restrict the movement of water, which extends the time needed for chemicals to break down before reaching the water table. As stated in item 19, the average depth to groundwater on the site is estimated at approximately 150 feet below ground surface, providing a significant buffer between the soil surface and the groundwater aquifer. Because development will be typical of residential uses, no unusual wastes or chemicals are anticipated to be spread or spilled that would cause significant groundwater contamination. The proposed project may offer continued groundwater protection by providing adequate stonnwater treatment and vegetated infiltration areas such as rain gardens, and buffers to help capture runoff and filter pollutants. The project will adhere to the Valley Branch and South Washington Watershed Districts infiltration requirements for stonnwater. Because of the site's elevated position in the overall landscape, the propensity for runoff to drain away from rather than towards the site, and the absence of surface water connections to known PFC-contaminated waterbodies (i.e. Raleigh Creek, Eagle Point Lake, and Lake Elmo), the potential for infiltrating contaminated surface waters on the site is low. Special Well and Boring Construction Area According to the Minnesota Department of Health, 2012, a special well and boring construction area is "a mechanism which provides for controls on the drilling or alteration of public and private water supply wells, and monitoring wells in an area where groundwater contamination has, or may, result in risks to the public health. The purpose of a Special Well and Boring Construction Area is to inform the public of potential health risks in areas of groundwater contamination, provide for the construction of safe water supplies, and prevent the spread of contamination due to the improper drilling of wells or borings," Contractors proposing to drill a well or boring in an advisory area must first contact the Minnesota Department of Health, Well Management Section to determine proper procedures for installation. As previously discuss, Perfluorochemical (PFC)-groundwater contamination exists near the project area. While the project is located in a Special Well and Boring Construction Area, installation of new groundwater wells is not planned by the project. Groundwater Protection and Mitigation Measures The Savona residential development will offer a higher level of groundwater protection than exists under current conditions. Chemical applications can be high in agriculturally -dominated landscapes. The conversion of the site to urban uses will ensure greater protection of groundwater by: ( I) covering exposed soils with turf and landscape plants to reduce infiltration of nutrients and pesticides; (2) reducing hazardous materials on the property to include only household quantities; (3) providing 27 acres of park, woodland, and open space; (4) providing stonnwater treatment systems; (5) abandoning an existing irrigation well; and (6) not drilling any new wells for the project. 18 Savona LAW April 3.2013 20. Solid Wastes, Hazardous Wastes, and Storage Tanks a) Describe tipes, amountsand compositions qrsolid or hacardous ivastes, including solid animal manure, sludge and ash, produced during construction and operation. IcIntifi method and locution oldisposal. For projects generating municipal solid waste, indicate if there iS ("1 source separation plan: describe how the project will he modified fOr recycling. If hazardous waste is generated, indicate if there is a hazanlous waste minimization plan and r011fille ha:at-dons waste reduction assessments, Construction activities will generate wastes typical of residential development operations. No solid or hazardous wastes, including solid animal manure, sludge, and ash, will he produced during construction and/or operation. The contractor will dispose of wastes generated at the site in an approved method by using commercial dumpsters and disposing construction wastes at an MPCA- pennitted landfill. The contractor will recycle construction waste that can he recycled, when feasible. Following project construction, solid waste generation will be typical of occupied residential developments of' this size. It is not anticipated that the proposed project will generate significant amounts of wastes that would be considered hazardous aside from typical household cleaners, paints, lubricants, and fuel storage for small power equipment. The majority of the solid waste generated will include materials such as paper, organics (food wastes, wood, and rubber products), yard waste, and inert solids. The remaining wastes will likely include plastics, metals, and glass. According to the Metropolitan Solid Waste Management Policy Plan 2010-2030 (MPCA, 2011), a Minnesota family of five generates approximately six tons of garbage per year, or 1.2 tons per occupant. The following residential solid waste generation rates were based on the conservative figures that the average single-family dwelling consists of 2.9 persons based on 2010 City of Lake Elmo census data. The household occupant number was then multiplied by 1.2 tons per person per year, based on the MPCA estimate for Minnesota families. Using these conservative figures, the proposed development could generate as much as 1,086 tons per year (312 units X 2.9 people/unit X 1.2 tons/person/year) of residential municipal solid waste per year. Residents within the new development will contract individually with waste haulers for solid waste collection and recycling services under the city's open trash and recycling collection system. According to the cities web page, there are currently five licensed waste haulers. Curbside recycling, including paper, plastics, glass, and metals, is available to Lake Eltno residents through their solid waste collector. Participation in the recycling program by future residents of the project area is expected to reduce costs for solid waste trucking and disposal. Waste generated in Washington County is delivered to the Resource Recovery Facility in Newport. Minnesota. The majority of the waste is processed into Refuse Derived Fuel (RDF). This fuel is burned in place of coal at Xcel's power plants in either Red Wing or Mankato, Minnesota. WO' 10XiC or hazardous materials to be used or present at the site and identifi measures to be used to prevent them from contaminating groundwater. the use of toxic or hazardous materials will lead to a regulated waste, discharge Or emission, discuss any alternatives considered to minimize or eliminate the waste, discharge or emission, Only normal construction and household hazardous wastes are anticipated. Toxic or hazardous material such as fuel for construction equipment and materials used during the normal construction process of residential units (paint, adhesives, stains, acids, bases, herbicides, and pesticides) will I 9 Savona EA\V April 3, 2013 likely be used in typical quantities during site preparation and unit construction. Builders and contractors arc responsible for proper management and disposal of wastes generated during construction, which is typically handled by using construction dumpsters and the appropriate certified landfills. No known hazardous materials are currently located onsite. Use of toxic or hazardous materials, outside of vehicle fuels, standard household cleaners, and lawn care chemicals, is not anticipated within the project area in conjunction with the proposed residential development hulicate the number, locution, size and use of any above or below ground tanks to store petroleum products or other materials, except water, Describe any emergency response containment plans. As described in Item 9, a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was conducted by Liesch Associates, Inc. in October 2012, No underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks were observed on the property, or reported to Liesch. It is currently not anticipated that above or below ground tanks for storage of petroleum or other materials will be located on the project site. However, if above or below ground tanks are proposed on the site, they will be installed according to MPCA regulations, and consideration will he given to spill and leak detection and prevention technologies, as well as double -walled tank construction. 21. Traffic Parking spaces added: 0 Existing spaces (if project involves expansion): 0 Estimated total average daily traffic generated: 2,518 Estimated maximum peak hour traffic generated and time of 253 trips occurrence: (Peak hour approximately 4:30 to 5:30 PM) Indicate source of trip generation rates used in the estimates. Trip Generation, 9th Edition If the peak hour traffic generated exceeds 250 vehicles or the total daily trips exceeds 2.500, a traffic impact study must be prepared as part of -the EA ff. Using the format and procedures described in the Minnesota Department of Transportation's Traffic Impact Study Guidance (available at; http://mvw.dot.stateannats/accessmanagement/pdfiManualchapters/chapter5pdf) or a similar local guidance, provide an estimate of the impact on traffic congestion on affected roads and describe any traffic improvements necessary. The analysis must discuss the project's impact on the regional transportation system. A traffic study was completed for the proposed project in April 2013. The traffic study examined the potential traffic -related impacts of the proposed project on the adjacent roadway system and key intersections near the site. A copy of the traffic study is included in Appendix E, and summarized below. Trip Generation The trip generation for the proposed project was determined based on the standard trip generation rates contained in Trip Generation, 9th Edition (Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012). The trip generation estimates for the proposed project are shown in Table 21.1 . ?0 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 land lise Table 21.1 Trip Generation Summary Development Daily Trips Units (Trip Ends) Single - Family Residential Multi -Family Residential Totals A.M. 1'eak Hour P.M. Peak Hour (Approx. (Approx. 7:15 — 8:15 A.M.) 4:30 — 5:30 P.M.) In Out 'total In Out Total 190 DUs 1,810 36 107 143 120 70 190 122 DUs 708 9 45 54 42 21 63 312 DUs 2,518 45 152 197 162 91 253 As shown in Table 21.2, the proposed project is expected to generate a total of 2,518 trips on a daily basis, 197 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound). The values listed under the "Daily" column represent total trip ends. A trip end is one movement to or from a location. For example, a resident leaving home in the morning to drive to work produces one morning trip end from the house. The return trip home in the afternoon produces a second trip end to that house. Access and Trip Assignrnent Access for the proposed project will be provided via a newly constructed collector roadway (5th Street North) which will then intersect with Keats Avenue (CSAH 19). The newly constructed roadway was originally identified in the City of Lake Elmo's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, The Transportation Plan suggested a new east -west roadway between l0th Street (CSAH 10) and the 1-94 frontage road be added to the transportation system. This new roadway alignment has been incorporated into the site plans of the proposed project and represents the southern boundary of the single-family residential development. "Designated as a minor collector, this route would allow local traffic to access the north -south county roads. Rather than a straight shot between points, this roadway would likely curve between new developments to provide access." According to the City's Transportation Plan, this new east -west roadway is expected to handle approximately 5,000 vpd by the year 2030 between Keats Avenue and Inwood Avenue to the west. Once extended through to Inwood Avenue, some traffic flowing east to Keats Avenue would likely be re -directed west to Inwood Avenue for access to the 1-94 corridor. This new east -west roadway will also likely reduce the traffic volumes along loth Street to levels where capacity improvements will not likely be needed by the year 2030. The trips generated by the proposed project were distributed to the adjacent roadway system using. the 'following directional distribution: • 15 percent to/from the north via Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) • 10 percent to/from the south via Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) • 20 percent to/from the east via 1-94 • 40 percent to/from the west via 1-94 • 15 percent to/from the west via Hudson Boulevard 21 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Existing Conditions An operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the following key intersections in order to determine how traffic conditions currently operate in the study area: • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 10th Street (CSAH 10) • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 1-94 West Ramps • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 1-94 East Ramps • Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at Hudson Boulevard The Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersections with the 1-94 West and East Ramps are signalized. as well as the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard, The Keats Avenue intersection with 10th Street (CSAH 10) is all -way stop controlled, and the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard is side -street stop controlled. The existing conditions analysis revealed that all five (5) of the key intersections currently operate at acceptable level of service (LOS) C or better during the a.in. and p.m. peak hour with existing geometries and traffic control. Future Conditions It is anticipated that the proposed project will be fully built -out by the year 2018. Therefore, an operations analysis was also completed for the year 2018 in order to determine the traffic -related impacts of the proposed development on the adjacent roadway system. Two future year development scenarios were analyzed: year 2018 no -build, and year 2018 build. The year 2018 no - build conditions assume that the proposed project is not built; however, background traffic growth in the study area is assumed to grow at a 1.7 percent annual growth rate. The year 2018 no -build conditions is used as a future year base from which the year 2018 build traffic volumes were developed. The year 2018 build conditions assume that the proposed project is fully build -out. In addition to the five (5) key intersections analyzed as part of the existing conditions analysis, the proposed east -west roadway (5th Street) intersection with Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) was also analyzed as part of the year 2018 build conditions operations analysis. The year 2018 no -build conditions analysis revealed that all of the five (5) key intersections continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing geometries and traffic control. The analysis results for the year 2018 build -out conditions revealed that even with the addition of the traffic generated by the proposed development, the five (5) key study intersections as well as the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the proposed 5th Street will operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with existing geometries and traffic control. Conclusions While the proposed development will increase traffic volumes on adjacent roadways, the increase will not have an adverse impact on traffic operations since the adjacent roadways have enough reserve capacity to accommodate the site -related traffic. Therefore, with the exception of the proposed east -west collector roadway (5th Street) that will serve as the primary access to the proposed development, no additional improvements are needed to the existing roadway system to accommodate the proposed project. Savona EAW April 3, 2013 22. Vehicle -Related Air Emissions Estimate the effect of the project 's nyttlic generation 017 air qualiti', including carbon monoxide levels. Discnss the effect of • dfic imp-ovements or other mitigation measures on air quality impacts. Increased traffic will generate a relatively small corresponding increase in carbon monoxide levels and other vehicle -related air emissions. The project is expected to have a negligible impact on air quality. Consequently, baseline air quality monitoring, or predictive air quality modeling, has not been scheduled at this time, and no measures to mitigate air quality impacts have been considered. 23. Stationary Source Air Emissions Describe the tvpc. sources, quantities and compositions of any emissionsfrom stationary SOUICTS ClIliSSI011S such as boilers, exhaust stacks orliigitive chat sources. Include any hazardous (I/O pollutants (consult EA w Guidelines for a listing) and any greenhouse gases (such as carbon dioxide. methane, nitrous oxide) and ozone -depleting chemicals (chloro: - carbons, hydrolluorocarbons, peoquor)carbons or sulfur hexalluoride). Also describe any proposed po prevention techniques and proposed air pollution control devices. Describe the impacts on air quality. Because development of heavy industrial facilities is not proposed on this site, no stationary source air emissions are anticipated as a result of this project. 24. Odors, Noise and Dust Will the project' generate odors, noise or dust during construction or during operation? 0 Yes 0 No ves, describe sources, characteristics, duration, quantities or intensity mid mo' proposed measures to mitigate adverse impacts. Also identifY locations of nearby sensitive receptors and estimate impacts on them. Discuss potential impacts on human health or quality of life. (Note..fugitive dust generated by operations may be discussed at item 23 instead of here.) Project development will not generate odors, noise or dust in excess of levels emitted during typical construction practices of suburban developments. Any odors, noise, or dust produced during construction will meet the requirements of the MPCA and applicable local regulations. Odors The project will not generate significant odors during construction or operation. The emission of odor by any use shall be in compliance with City Code Section 96.03, 4(a). Noise The project will be constructed in accordance with the city's established noise ordinance as outlined in City Code Sections 130.45 to 130.47. It is anticipated that noise levels will temporarily increase locally during project construction, but are expected to return to normal levels following project completion. Noise levels on and adjacent to the site will vary considerably during construction depending on the pieces ofconstruction equipment being operated simultaneously, the percent of time in operation, and the distance from the equipment to the receptors. The nearest receptors to the proposed project are several single-family residences located to the north along Julep Avenue North, and commercial businesses to the south and west along both Eagle Point and Hudson Boulevards. In accordance with Section 130.47 of the City Code, construction equipment will not be operated between the hours of 6:00 pm and 7:00 am on weekdays, and during any hours on Saturdays, Sundays, and state and federal holidays. 23 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Dust The construction process is expected to generate some dust, but it is not anticipated that fugitive dust will be generated in objectionable quantities. Consideration will be given to suppression of airborne dust by application of water if significant fugitive dust generation occurs during site grading and equipment operation. In general, incidental dust emissions generated during site construction will be consistent with City Code Section 96.03, 4(a). 25. Nearby Resources Arc any of the j011owing resources on or in proximity to MC site? Ifives, describe the resource and identifY piqfecr-related impacts on the resource. Describe any measures 10 minimize or avoid adverse impacts. Archaeological, historical or architectural resources? 0 Yes' 0 No The Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) conducted a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structure Inventory for the project area (Appendix D). Based on their review, no previously -recorded archaeological sites or historic structures were identified in the database for the project area. Consequently, no further review of archaeological, historical or architectural resources is considered warranted at this time. Prime or unique farmlands or land within an agricultural preserve? 0 Yes 0 No According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), four of the eight soil types found on the site are classified as prime farmland (Table 19.1). These soils comprise 73.0 acres or approximately 65 percent of the site area. Prime farmlands consist of land that has the best combination of physical and chemical characteristics for producing food, feed, forage, and oilseed crops. According to the NRCS, prime farmlands have "an adequate and dependable water supply from precipitation, a favorable temperature and growing season, acceptable acidity or alkalinity, acceptable salt and sodium content and few or no rocks." This does not mean all soils listed as prime farmland produce exceptionally high crop yields. No farmland preservation measures have been considered. Because the site is guided for development. no clear alternatives to conversion of prime farmland are readily identifiable. Designated parks. recreation areas trails? E7 Ycs 0 No There are currently no designated parks, recreation areas, or trails within the project boundaries. Lake Elmo Regional Park Reserve is located less than a mile north of the proposed project site. Stonegate Park, located approximately 1,000 feet northwest of the project area, contains a playground and athletic fields. SCelliC ViOrs and vistas? 0 Yes 0 No There are no scenic views or vistas located on or near the property. Other tongue resources? 0 Yes 0 No 24 Savona EAW April 3. 2013 26. Visual Impacts Titil the project create adverse visual impacts during construction or operation? Such as glare from intense lights, lights visible in wilderness areas and large visible plumesfrom cooling towers or exhaust stacks? 0 Yes 0,No. Ilyes, explain, The project will not create adverse visual impacts. The proposed residential land use is consistent with other established uses in the area, and therefore will not create a significant change in visual aesthetics. Measures to soften visual transitions include providing buffers between existing homes and gravel mining operations to the north, preservation of tree cover where possible, and providing berrns, buffers and landscaping adjacent to proposed collector streets and other adjacent land uses. 27. Compatibility with Plans and Land Use Regulations Is the project subject to an adopted local comprehensive plan, land use plan or regulation, or other applicable land use, water, or resource management plan of a local, regional, state orlederal agencv? 0 Yes 0 No. Ilyes, describe the plum discuss its compatibility with the project and eiplain how tinv conflicts will be resolved. If no, explain. The project is subject to the City of Lake Elmo's Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Ordinance. As described in the recently amended Land Use Plan, the city plans to grow its population by increasing the total number of households from 2,779 to 3,519 by 2015. In accordance with a Memorandum of Understanding with the Metropolitan Council, the city has committed to providing 6,600 additional Residential Equivalent Connections (RECs) by 2030. This will be partially achieved by increasing residential density within the 1-94 corridor. The Comprehensive Plan includes a land use and staging plan map that guides future community growth and improvement. The City of Lake Elmo zoning map designates the Dale property as HD-RR-SRD, which is a Rural Residential/Sewered Residential Holding District. The Frandsen property is currently zoned HD-A-SRD, which is an Agricultural/ Sewered Residential Holding District. Both are consistent with the proposed use, although re -zoning the properties to the appropriate LDR and MDR zoning will be required prior to development. The Lake Elmo 1-94 Development Staging Plan map (2012) designates the project area as being within Stage I (new sewered development located west- of Keats Avenue that will connect to the MCES WONE interceptor). Consequently, the proposed project is consistent with the goals and plans of both the City of Lake Elmo and the Metropolitan Council for this area. 28. Impact on Infrastructure and Public Services UV new or expanded utilities, wads, other infrastructure or public services he required to serve the project? 0 Yes 0 No. Ifyes, describe the new or additional infrastructure or services needed. Owe: any - 'structure that is u connected action with respect to the project must be assessed in the EA FP? see EA IF Guidelinesfr details.) Public and private infrastructure improvements will need to be constructed in association with this development. These include but are not limited to: roadways, trails, stormwater systems, electrical lines, telephone lines, and continued improvements and upgrades to the sanitary sewer and water supply systems. The Comprehensive Plan calls for inunicipal sewer and water facilities to be extended from the southeast comer of the Eagle Point Business Park along Hudson Boulevard to service this portion of the city and proposed new residential development. The project will also require construction of a collector roadway along the southern portion of the property boundary that 25 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 would intersect with Keats Avenue North to the east for proper site access and traffic control. This collector road will eventually be extended west as those properties develop as guided. 'Impacts related to public improvements directly associated with the proposed development project are discussed throughout this document. 29. Cumulative Impacts finnesoia Rule part 4410.1700„subpar1 7, item 13 requires that the laiti consider the "cumulative potential effects of related or anticipateiffitture protects" when determining the need far an environmental impact statement. IdentifY any past, present or reelsonablv fareseeable fiaure protects that may interact with the project described in this E,i If- in such a way as to cause cumulative potential effects. (Such figure projects would be those that are actually planned odor which a basis of expectation has been laid.) Describe the nature of the cumulative potential effects and summarize ally other available information relevant to determining whether there is potential far significant environmental effects due to these cumulative effects (or discuss each cumulative notential effect under appropriate (tem(s) elsewhere on this foon The changes in regional land use in the Lake Elmo area from open space and agricultural land to more urbanized uses is expected to have a cumulative impact on the area. Cumulative effects of this and future projects on natural resources and infrastructure are expected to be roughly proportional to the impacts discussed in this EAW, or somewhat greater if future projects are developed at a higher density. The City of _Lake Elmo has planned for future growth and development in this particular area as part of its Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2012), utility plans, storniwater management plans, and administration of zoning ordinances. These efforts will ensure that the cumulative impacts of future growth and development to the environment. and to the city's service capacity, are anticipated arid mitigated. The project proposer does not currently own or have options on adjacent lands. Consequently, the precise timing and nature of future development in the project vicinity is unknown. However, land adjacent to the project site is eventually expected to develop, per the city's Land Use Plan. thereby converting existing open space and agricultural lands to residential and commercial uses. The City of Lake Elmo's Amended Comprehensive Land Use Plan (2012) anticipates and guides the intensity of development within the city and directs necessary infrastructure improvements to support the planned development. Parcels to the south, west, and northeast of the proposed project area are currently undeveloped and zoned HD-A-SRD or HD-RR-SRD. in keeping with the city's Comprehensive Plan. and the MOU with the Metropolitan Council, these parcels are expected to develop in the future to mediumdensity residential and/or commercial uses. Undeveloped parcels immediately surrounding the proposed development site contain similar land uses and land features as the project site. Existing land cover on these properties is primarily agricultural, with grasslands, wooded tree lines, and small wetlands interspersed. The proposed project will not result in conversion ofjurisdictional wetland to upland, but will result in minor tree removal and conversion of agricultural lands to non-agricultural uses. Consequently, cumulative impacts to natural resources are anticipated to be minimal, and have been purposefully concentrated in this portion of the city to preserve an agricultural core to the north of 10ffi Street (CSAH 10). 26 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Development of surrounding parcels will also result in cumulative impacts to city infrastructure such as roads, sewer, and water. These cumulative impacts have been thoughtfully contemplated and addressed in the city's Comprehensive, Transportation, Wastewater, and Water Plans. As the surrounding properties develop, they will be evaluated under the Minnesota Environmental Policy Act (MEPA) rules, and will adhere to guidelines presented in the city's approved zoning and comprehensive plans for the area. Mitigation for anticipated minor cumulative impacts in the area will include providing approximately 27 acres of open space (24 percent of the site), providing buffers from surrounding developments, protecting woodlands to the extent practicable, pretreating stonnwater and controlling stonnwater rates, providing adequate municipal facilities such as potable water and wastewater treatment, and addressing filture traffic issues. These provisions will help minimize potential cumulative effects of past developments and future developments within the region. 30. Other Potential Environmental Impacts lithe project may cause any adverse environmental impacts not addressed by items I to 28, identifY and discuss them here, along with any proposed mitigation. No other adverse environmental impacts are anticipated as a result of this project. Potential environmental impacts have been addressed in Items 1 through 29. 31. Summary of Issues Du not complete this section if the EA If' is being dune for EIS scopirig; instead, address relevant issues in the draft Scopim.r. Decision document, which must accompany the EA 11'. List any impacts and issues identified above that may require Iiirther investigation before the project is begun. Discuss any alternatives or- mitigative measures that have been or may be considered/Or these impacts ancl issues, including those that have been or mar be ordered us permit conditions. Table 31.1. Summary of Issues and Mitigation Measures Item Title Mitigation Measures Permits and Approvals Apply for and receive all pplicable permits prior to project 8 Required construction. Abandon existing septic system on Frandsen parcel according to local code requirements. Prepare a Construction 9 Land Use Contingency Plan to detail management of debris and impacted soils during development. Preservation and creation of approximately 27 acres of open space, stonnwater ponding, woodland, and buffers. Sealing and abandonment of one irrigation well on the Frandsen parcel; compliance with DNR Water Appropriation Permit requirements; connection to the municipal water supply system. Fish, Wildlife, and I I Ecologically Sensitive Resources 13 Water Use 27 Savona EAW April 3, 2013 Item Title Table 31.1. Summary of Issues and Mitigation Measures 16 Erosion and Sedimentation 17 Water Quality: Surface Water Runoff 21 Traffic RGU CERTIFICATION Mitigation Measures Minimize the potential for erosion by BMP implementation: compliance with the city's Erosion and Sediment Control Ordinance and NPDES/SDS General Permit requirements; preparation of a SWPP plan. Creation of stonnwater ponds and BMP's to manage stormwater runoff and adhere to the city's Storm Water Ordinance and watershed rules. Detailed traffic recommendations are provided within the conclusions portion of Section 21 of this document. The Environmental Oualiry Board will only accent SIGNED Environmental .4ssessment Worksheets Tor public notice in the EOB Monitor. I hereby certify that: • The information contained in this document is accurate and complete to the best of my knowledge. • The EAW describes the complete project; there are no other projects, stages or components other than those described in this docuinent, which are related to the project as connected actions or phased actions, as defined at Minnesota Rules. parts 4410.0200, subparts 9b and 60, respectively. • Copies of this EAW are being sent to the entire EQB distribution list. Signature Date Title: Kvle Klatt, Planning Director. City of Lake Elmo Environmental Assessment Worksheet was prepared by the staff of the Environmental Quality Board at the Minnesota Department of Administration, Office of Geographic and Demographic Analysis. For additional information. worksheets or for E-4 if Guidelines, contact: Environmental Quality Board, 658 Cedar St., St. Paul, MN 55155, 651-201-2492, or http://www.eqb,state.mn.us Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank Mop DaromodnE Pm20121161-GLMEAVE LohoElowEAG, OmCGA mod 41 2013 030.22 PM E 2E' Woodoemod Prpl000q OPO,c, bury ota Sourcemo WEstwood Pmfoosional Semmes Sumo/ DMA (20121, USGS OGG (ESRt Fidoemap, AGoossod 20,2) Westwood ProfiessIonsi &entices, inc 7699 Anommo Of /VC Eden 060, ,.M0 55304 PHONE 9E2,937,5150 FAX +357-M17.5822 TOGAVEE 1 .1188..937,5154 wiewv.westwoodps,com Feet 5,000 ick• yji Park * ^,14111M-i1117 /-)1141,f1 ?ft11-110 `1,4(6-1,47 .,11.1 -it "C•Aurylk '-Imo ht 066 .Mirmeapelis Saint Paul* Legend EAVV Project Boundary tin?: a • F1th pA1.1 Project Location V.o)0(101,r t '1 v n Lake Elmo, Elmo, Minnesota Site Location EXHIBIT 1 Map Docutr,,Int. P.12012111311GIS:EAW-L4keElmt,E515LORGO1A.rtud ai1/2013 3.31.45 PM 2013 Wnstwood Profesqtorta!Sern,,,, Inc A A— , 5 • Data Sourcets) West-,,,N,A Professional Semces Swvey Data int 21. USGS ORG iESRI Banernap. Accessed 20121 Westwood Profesislonel Services, Inc 1609 Anagram Drive Eden PeelNe, MN 55344 PHONE 952,937,5150 FAX 952.437.5822 Ackt.rm 1.808.937,5150 enwcwestwoodps,corn Legend I Feet 2,000 EAW Project Boundary A 7. e := A *' re. V 71 Lake Elmo, Minnesota USGS Topography EXHIBIT 2 61P D5c{fnretit: k"5531ist 161 C;1StEAVi.; ni cEtnaaEA1S' Ftant3l.A 1 2d • /1/2013 ,s.5615 Phi 2013 W esmood 62 ssionas , COP4CEPT,DATA 6ipt..,6,6 n,ea C$52r.,r naffs anw OCtn;na6a:- -_ P, flt,e66CPpo,4d100"n5 3141pr62Y nrraaH f�e�Yy ttftttty-_. ___2 ?Y nR.ar nai yCrvtt'+'+i Westwood Professional Servkrs. lot 7699 Anawnm Drive Edon Prnnin.MN 55344 1=NONE 952.93755158 FAX 952613T-5822 TO L61*61 1..6 337415n www.westwoodmeorn E3iY1 �3asemap. Accessed 2512) imarr• l Feet 0 400 Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Proposed Site Plan EXHIBIT 3 Mop Do.of P.'20121 i 6tt=>[SEA'AOLo.,EUnr,EAVf_ALUO1A and 41r2ou 258:11 PM 2017 iVestwood Prnksslonat Scrv,r•,s 1 gricultural Field _ Agricultural Field Commerci ng[e-Fami ly ResidenkiaE Agricu Family ential Agricultural - Field SResident Res ;fir r =-v= Single -Family ,.�f-.>--�x� ---_--•�--•- Residential" Sou'cetst: Westwood Professionet Serw,os S-uNey Dom r20t2k. IJSGS ORG tESM Bosornop, Accr.,5ed 2412t Westwood Professional Service, Inc 7699 A nagrwn O rwe Ellen Prairla, MN 55344 PHONE 052.937.5160 rax 962.937.5822 TO€LPREE !.$80-387-5150 www.westssoodps,mm mi,„..... I Feet 0 1,000 Gravel E;d raction Legend ,Gravel Extraction Commercial EAW Project Boundary Agricultur& Field Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Adjacent Land Use EXHIBIT 4 MT, Dacument P^2O12' 1G i'GISnEAONI-Hc ElmeEAN: CI,Uti1A.mxd .trif2 Data Saurce(s1_ Nestwo emcts Stiro:y Data (2014 HOGS DPo 3IESR1 Bascmae, Accoss«d 20 t2I WeeProfessional Services, lnc. 0 400 7E09 Anagram 5rtve Eden Pratrt, 9N 55344 PHONE 852.937-5150 FAX 952,tt,77.4N22 104LFREE t-8a5-937.515O hww,vrcstwoodps.com Feet Legend EAW Project Boundary 112.5 Acres Cropped Field 51,2 Acres - Develope.diRoad 14 Acres nGolf Course Driving Range 33.5 Acres Upland Meadow 9.4 Acres Excavated Pond 1 8 Acres Upland Woodland 5 2 Acres Natural Gas Pipeline, Easement Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Cover Type Mapping EXHIBIT 5 Map 88,88,01t P020121161INISIEAWILakeEttooZety976lAyo08 4/1,2013 343-28 PM ,3 2013 Westwood PtotessloPat Seryytey, Inc CC54 63 08 JJLEPAy L-18 62 Cottage Grove Ravine Portion South Washington Watershed 8454District Boundary , Legend EAW Project Boundary wz3 772 74:7 Valley Branch'"' Watershed District Boundary nt te4,41, S150 213 K00 to 101 0 DMA $.1,01si- Westwood Proteysionat Services POrvey bola t 2012f. City of Lake Elmo Zottinu Map ( Accessed 7012) Wtwood Professional Sentkes 1E99 Anagram Dove Eden /M8lr/MN 553314 PHONE 952.033-61E0 FAX 952-83135E22 'ECNErkeE 1.8I1-007.5150 westwoodps.corn Legend 687 .4? ,ro, 0 9640 Zoning Ilstotts 188-! A Oen.* Watttrytted Osplets Vta,gLAri,a 088 CPO, Mia-vitver j OPL8P tvke, L80L 2 888-88'13ory 1 96818 1* 88 888018288881 e"SA.b, 8613 B5.5 G 0 0 0 ere 8L86135' 818 18489 81 1313 VP, VP LP -PVC- VP R ' 8r4 - 9.180LPRVID:888R8T -5) 0 0 0 0 818, - 0-,f,30 -1037 ! Feet 800 Savona EAW 8188,, 8011,844 61.1e1.1.4441t11, 1,81,8 Lake Elmo, Minnesota Zoning Map EXHIBIT 6 f,1ao Dncurrt,,r. P'29 2; 1611GIS'.EA41'1tas,.eEimnyDRer0nc07A 2013 O/estwood Pro€esDoss;tt Inc Data Saurcetst Westwaor9 Profess:onai Se. ces Survey Daia t2012r USFWS NW) (19R,) P,?N DNR hi,nor (90lersned Bnttndnrtss 0007) FEMA Floudplain Data (200A} USGS 17RG i0_SRI 0o amap. Acce=s«d 20121 n PHONE 952.937-5150 FAX 952.437.5622 TOU.FR00 1-E88-937-5150 www,westwoodrncom �■ Feet 0 7©© Legend EAW Project Boundary MN DNR Minor Watershed Boundary Mapped 100-Year Floodplain NWI Mapped Wetland Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Water Resources Mapping EXHIBIT 7 M30 11/009014n1 P.t20/21161/GIStEAWL.sxaEimo So/0lA.9txd 4/1 2013 2'999:0.1 09/ 2013 Westwoad Pra'esston- Data So,xce!st Westwood Pro7essiona+ Sere SURRG4 Saas or `h,ashmitan County t2004, 'e/ csa:a tl RG i0SR1 Westwood Professional Services, in<» 7099 wrmor im (trn+c Eden Prntric. MN 55344 05109E 952.937.5150 sax 952.937-5422 YtH17900 1-0800937.5150 www.wertwoodps.com p. Accessed 2012) i.._.. I Feet 0 400 Legend EAW Pro act Boundary Hydric Soil Unit Non-Hydrir, Soil Unil Savona EAW Lake Elmo, Minnesota Soils Mapping EXHIBIT 8 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank IMinneapolism Los Angeles _._.Milwaukee source: jos virtual Et,tirll Projection: NADM3 urm Zone I 5N est Hydrogeologists Engineers Environmental Scientists Phoenix Test Pit Miscellaneous Debris Observed Property Boundary tt 75 150 Feet ittittlit,j Lake Elmo, MN Test Pit Locations Nov 12 Figure 4 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank DivisionDivin ol+f Ecological and Watcr Resourccs Box 25 phone: 051) 259-5109 E-mail: lisajoya kctstatc,mn.us December 19, 2012 Mr. David Weetman Westwood Professional Services, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 RE: Natural Heritage Review of the proposed Lake Elmo Property; T29N R21W Section 34; Washington County Correspondence # ERDB 2013(1158 Dear Mr, Weetman, As requested, the above project has been reviewed for potential effects to known occurrences of rare features. A search of the Minnesota Natural Heritage Information System did identify rare features within an approximate one -mile radius of the proposed project, but these records did not include any federally listed species and were either historical or not of concern given the project details that were provided with the data request form. As such, I do not believe the proposed project vill adversely affect any known occurrences ofrare features. The Natural Heritage Information System (NHIS), a collection of databases that contains information about Ivlinnesota's rare natural features. is maintained by the Division of Ecological and Water Resources, Department of Natural Resources. The NHIS is continually updated as new information becomes available, and is the most complete source of data on Minnesota's rare or otherwise significant species, native plant communities, and other natural features. However, the NH IS is not an exhaustive inventory and thus does not represent all of the occurrences of rare features within the state. Therefore. ecologically significant features for which we have no records may exist within the project area. For environmental review purposes, the results of this Natural Heritage Review are valid for one year; the results are only valid for the project location (noted above) and project description provided on the NHIS Data Request Form. Please contact me if project details change or if an updated review is needed. Please note that locations of the gray wolf (Canis lupus). state -listed as special concern, and the Canada lynx (Ltlir cunudensis), federally -listed as threatened, are not currently tracked in the NHIS. As such, the Natural Heritage Review does not address these species. Furthermore. the Natural Heritage Review does not constitute review or approval by the Department of Natural Resources as a whole. Instead, it identifies issues regarding known occurrences of rare features and potential effects to these rare features. Additional rare features for which we have no data may be present in the project area, or there may be other natural resource concerns associated \vith the proposed project. For these concerns, please contact your DNR Regional Environmental Assessment Ecologist (contact information available at Please be aware that additional site assessments or review may be required. Thank you for consulting us on this matter, and for your interest in preserving Minnesota's rare natural resources. An invoice will he mailed to you under separate cover. Sincerely, Samantha Bump NHIS Review Technician Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank Well Log Report - 00686580 Page 1 of 1 Minnesota Unique Weti N. 686580 County Quad Quad ID Washington Lake Elmo 1028 Well Name M.M. GOLF ONE Township Range Dir Section Subsections Elevation 29 21 W 34 DACDAC Elevation Method Address 400 KEATS AV LAKE ELMO MN 55042 Geological Material SAND/GRAVEL LIME REMARKS WELL INSPECTION BY MDH FOUND ONLY 15 FT, OF 20 IN. CASING IN THE INELL. Grouting Information Well Grouted? El Yes E1 No Color BROWN YELLOW Hardness MEDIUM SOFT 7 5 minute topographic map Drilling Method Nonspecthed Rotary MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH WELL AND BORING Entry Date 11/13/2002 Update Date 05/13/2010 RECORD Received Date Minnesota Statutes Chapter 10.71 Well Depth Depth Completed 961 ft. 300 ft. 300 ft. id e Date Well Completed 10/10/2002 Well Hydrofractured? EJ Yes From Ft. to FL No vse on From To Casing Type Steel (black or low carbon) Joint Welded Drive Shoe? 0 152 152 300 Yes 0 No Above/Below ft: Casing Diameter Weight 1._ 20 n. to 15 ft. 78.6 lbs.tft. i 10 in. to 152 ft 40.48 lbs./ft, Open Hole from 152 ft. to 300 ft Screen NO Make Type Hole Diameter 20 in. to 20 ft. 15 In. to 152 ft. Diameter Slot/Gauze Length Set Between at r Level 120 tt from Land surface Date Measured 10/03/2002 PUMPING LEVEL (below land surface) 150 ft after 6 hrs. pumping 300 e.p,m, Well Head Completion Pities& adapter manufacturer Model D Casing Protection D 12 in, above grade I n At -grade (Environmental Wells and Borings ONLY) Located by: Minnesota Department of Health Unique Number Verification: N/A System: UTM - Nad83, Zone15, Meters Method: Digitization (Screen). Map (1:24,000) Input Date: 11/03/2003 X: 507375 Y: 4977762 First Bedrock Prairie Du Chien Group Last Strat Prairie Du Cffien Group County Well Index Online Report Grout Material: Neat Cement from 0 to 152 ft. Nearest Known Source of Contamination _feet _direction _type Well disinfected upon completion? C3 Yes 0 No Pump 0 Not Installed Date Installed 19/10/2002 refs name BERKELEY Model number 7-T120-15 Volts al Pipejjt Capacity ?al...9.p.m Type Submersible Materiat 5 yrds. Abandoned Wells Does property have any not in use and not s et wei(s)7 1:1 Yes No Variance Was a variance granted from the MDH for this well? 0 Yes 1:1 No Well Contractor Certification Aquifer Prairie Du Chien Group Kimmes-BauerDrilline Depth to Bedrock 152 ft License Business Name 686580 19738 Uc. Or Reg. No. MILLER, M. Name of Dniter Printed 11/27/2012 HE-01205-07 mhtml:file:/A\fileman\projects\20121161\does\Envir\EAW1Background\Well Log Report -... 2/26/2013 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page iuintentionally blank David Weetman From: Dean Sather Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 3:02 PM To: David Weetman Subject: FW: Property Search From: Thomas Cinadr [mailto:thomas.cinadr(&mnhs.org] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2012 2:18 PM To: Dean Sather Subject: Re: Property Search THIS E L IS NOT A PROJECT CLE , , CE. This message simply reports the results of the cultural resources database search you requested. The database search produced results for only previously known archaeological sites and historic properties. Please read the note below carefully. No archaeological sites or historic structures were identified in a search of the Minnesota Archaeological Inventory and Historic Structures Inventory for the search area requested. The result of this database search provides a listing of recorded archaeological sites and historic architectural properties that are included in the current SHPO databases. Bccause the majority of archaeological sites in the state and many historic architectural properties have not been recorded, important sites or structures may exist within the search area and may be affected by development projects within that area. Additional research, including field survey, may be necessary to adequately assess the area's potential to contain historic properties. If you require a comprehensive assessment of a project's potential to impact archaeological sites or historic architectural properties, you may need to hire a qualified archaeologist and/or historian. If you need assistance with a project review, please contact Kelly Gragg-Johnson in Review and Compliance Co 651-259-3455 or by email at kellv.graggiohnsonanuths.ore. The Minnesota SHP° Survey Manuals and Database Metadata and Contractor Lists can be found at htte://www.mehs.ore/sbno/sturvev/inventeries.htm Tom Cinadr Survey and Information Management Coordinator Minnesota State Historic Preservation Office Minnesota Historical Society 345 Kellogg Blvd. West St. Paul, MN 55102 651-259-3453 On Wed, Nov 21, 2012 at 10:32 AM, Dean Sather <Dean.Satheramestwoodps.com> wrote: Mr. Cinadr, I am requesting a Cultural Resource Database search for the following property located in Washington County: Township 29 North Range 21 West Section 34 Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns regarding this request. Thank you, Dean T. Sather, MA, RPA Archaeologist / Principal Investigator Licensure MN #11-007 Westwood Professional Services Serving clients across the Nation DIRECT 952-906-7488 2 Savona EAW Washington County, Minnesota This page is intentionally blank Traffic Impact Study to be inserted when finalized. /699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 PHONE 9S2-93/-5150 FA X 952-937-5822 TOLL FREF 888-937-5150 www.vvestwoodps.com MEMO - NDUM Date: April 9, 2013 Re: Savona: Traffic Study Lake Elmo, Minnesota File 20121161.00 To: Joe Jablonski. Land Development Manager, Lennar From: John M. Hagen, P.E., PTOE, Senior Transportation Engineer Cindie Flaig, Traffic Specialist Executive Summary As part of the on -going. Environmental Assessment Worksheet (EAW) for the proposed Savona development, the City of Lake Elmo requested that a traffic study be completed in order to determine the traffic -related impacts associated with the proposed Savona residential development located in the northwest quadrant of the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota. The proposed development will consist of 190 single-family and 122 multi-ffimily lots. The study results are summarized in the following paragraphs. with detailed information provided in the body of the memorandum, Existing Conditions: Results of the traffic operations analysis indicate that all of the key intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. A review of the vehicular queues revealed that vehicles in the southbound through lanes currently back up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 2 percent of the p.m. peak hour. However, the existing lagging left -turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. Proposed Development: It is anticipated that the proposed Savona residential development will be fully build -out by the year 2018. The proposed development will consist of 190 single-family and 122 multi -family lots. Access to the proposed development will be via a new east -west minor collector located between 10th Street (CSAH 10) and Hudson Boulevard. This new east - west collector roadway was initially identified in the City of Lake Elmo's Transportation Plan. As part of this project, the east -west collector roadway ‘vill be constructed from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western edge oldie proposed Savona residential development (or approximately 3/4-mile west of Keats Avenue). Ultimately, the east -west collector roadway will Land a riCi En*ItEn a., April 9, 2013 Page 2 be extended to connect to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). However, the completion of this future connection will be dependent on the development of the adjacent properties. The proposed Savona development will generate an estimated 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 197 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound trips), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). A comparison of the proposed development with the assumed land uses in the City ofLake Elmo's transportation plan revealed that the proposed Savona residential development appears to be consistent with the land use assumptions included in the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. Future Year 2018 No -Build Conditions: The year 2018 no -build analysis revealed that all intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the peak hours under the year 201 8 no -build conditions with existing geometries and signal timing. Not surprisingly, the review of the vehicular queues revealed the same minor queuing issues reported during the existing conditions on the southbound approach of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard during the p.m. peak hour will continue under the year 2018 no -build. Under year 2018 no -build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through inovement will back up past the existing la- and right -turn lanes approximately 6 percent of the p.m. peak hour (versus 2 percent under existing conditions). However, once again the existing lagging lett-turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The increase in the background traffic from the existing conditions and the year 2018 no -build conditions result in another potential queuing issue in the future during the p.m. peak hour. The review of the vehicular queues also revealed that vehicles in the heavy eastbound to southbound movement from 1-94 to CSAH 19 spill -out beyond the long eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent of the p.m. peak hour. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right-tum lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turn/through lane during the p.m. peak hour. Future Year 2018 Full Build -out Conditions: The analysis results for year 2018 full build -out conditions indicate that all of the key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. Similar to the no -build conditions, a review of the year 2018 hill build -out conditions vehicular queues revealed that the same minor queuing issues reported on the southbound approach of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard; and the eastbound approach of the 1-94 South Ramps at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection during the p.m. peak hour. Under year 2018 build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through movement at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) April 9, 2013 Page 3 intersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up past the existing la- and right -turn lanes approximately 8 percent of the p.m. peak hour (versus 6 percent under no -build conditions): and the eastbound right -turning vehicles from 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 will continue to spill -out beyond the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent of the p.m. peak hour. The existing lagging left-twn signal phase at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard will continue to help minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right -turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turn/through lane during the p.m. peak hour. This potential signal timing adjustment would be needed with or without the proposed Savona development. Secondary Access to Inwood Avenue (CSAII 13) or Hudson Boulevard: The proposed Savona residential development will construct a portion of 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western limits oftheir site. As the remaining available land north of 1-94 between Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13 develops, a secondary access may be needed to either Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13.) to the west or Hudson Boulevard to the south, in order to relieve pressure on the proposed Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. Based on the results of the traffic operations analysis, the intersection of Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and 5th Street can accon-unodate 100 percent (or the full build -out) of the ultimate 796 dwelling units assumed by the City's comprehensive plan to be directly served by the proposed east -west collector (5th Sfreet) before a secondary access is needed to relieve pressure on the intersection. Conclusions/Recomnzendations: The existing roadway system and traffic control will be able to accommodate the proposed Savona residential development, assuming the construction of the proposed 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western limits of the project to provide access in/out of the site. April 9, 2013 Page 4 Existing Conditions The proposed development is located in the northwest quadrant of the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota (see Figure 1: Project Location). Keats Avenue (CSAH 19), in the vicinity of the proposed development, is a divided four -lane roadway with an existing speed limit of 55 mph north of Hudson Boulevard and 50 mph south of Hudson Boulevard. Hudson Boulevard is a two-lane undivided roadway, and serves as north -frontage road to 1-94. The existing speed limit along Hudson Boulevard is 50 mph. Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13), to the west of the proposed development, is a divided four -lane roadway with an existing speed limit of 45 mph north in the vicinity of Hudson Boulevard. An operations analysis was conducted for the a.m. and p.m. peak hours at the following key intersections in order to determine how traffic conditions currently operates in the study area: • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 10th Street (CSAH 10) • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at North 1-94 Ramps • Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at South 1-94 Ramps • Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at Hudson Boulevard All key intersections were analyzed using Synchro/SimTraffic software. The existing signal timing (provided by the Washington County) was used in the analysis. Existing peak hour turning movement counts were collected by Westwood Professional Services in March 2013 at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersections with 10th Street (CSAH 1.0), Hudson Boulevard, and the North 1-94 Ramps. Washington County staff provided year 2010 counts at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps and the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard. Since there have been no major changes in this area and relatively stagnant economic conditions since the year 2010 traffic counts were taken by the County, the year 2010 traffic volumes were deemed to be a reasonable reflection of existing conditions at these two intersections Current !,-,,,eometrics and peak hour traffic volumes at the key intersections are shown in Figure 2. Copies of the raw turning movement count data at each of the key intersections are provided in Appendix A. Using the roadway geometric and traffic volume data described above as input, traffic operational analysis was performed per the standards set out in the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual, published by the Transportation Research Board, Synchro/SimTraffic 7 was used to complete the analysis. r Base mop source: Bing Maps, Microsoft Corporation, 2013 Wommog Pmfessincon Socciros. 7599 Anagram Drive riert M/ gr.3344 cg IONE 95/-917-5150 cA% 952-937,iV,/ 1-01.1 Fqk MIS TP-515U nomg avasisvontim corn Project Location Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN 4 April 9, 2013 420121161 Figure 1 54 49 197 LEGEND XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (XX)- P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Signalized Intersection All -Way Stop Control Intersection Side -Street Stop Control Intersection 5e map source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporation, 2013 Westwood Peak,ss,o rat 7555 Ana*3rrm Drive Eden Pia;:sr. Mt 55344 ?I NINE 952-531-3150 ?A% 952.93; 5B72 r9LL FRET 15BB 93! 5150 s n.,,,twonhps mm Existing Conditions Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 #20121161 Figure 2 April 9. 2013. Page 7 Two fundamental outputs from the operations analysis are typically used to characterize traffic flow. The first is Level of Service (LOS), a letter grade rani_iiiv, from -A- (free flow) to (demand exceeds capacity). Generally, LOS D represents the threshold for acceptable overall intersection operating conditions during a peak hour in the Twin Cities metro area. An average of live SimTraffic simulation runs is reported in the tables in the following sections within the body of this report. Level of service results from SimTraffic are reported in the Appendix. The second important output to consider from the operations analysis is queuing. A queue is a line of vehicles waiting to pass through an intersection. While an intersection may be reported as operating at an acceptable level of service, queues from the intersection extending to upstream intersections or driveways could create a potential safety issue. The 95th percentile queue is typically considered the standard for design purposes. The micro simulation component of the model. SimTraffic, is best suited for reviewing vehicular queues between closely -spaced intersections. Any 95th percentile queues that extend to an upstream intersection/driveway are reported in the text below as well as in the detailed results tables presented in the Appendix B. Results of the Synchro/SimTraffic analysis shown in Table 1 indicate that all of the key intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. Table I Existing Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 10th Street (CSAH 10) Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at North 1-94 Ramps Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at South 1-94 Ramps - Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at - Hudson Boulevard All -Way Stop Intersection Control A.M. Peak P.M. Peak A/B A/B Level of Service ' Keats Ave. - Free Flow A / B A / C Hudson Blvd. - Stop Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Traffic Signal "'For signalized intersections. the letter reported represents the LOS tbr the entire intersection. For unsignalized intersections, the first letter reported is the LOS of the entire intersection, while the second letter (in italics) is the LOS of the worst operating approach. A review of the vehicular queues revealed some existing minor queuing issues on the southbound approach of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard during the p.m. peak hour. The vehicular queues from the southbound through movement currently backs up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes April 9, 2013 Page 8 approximately 2 percent of the p.m. peak hour. However, the existing lagging left -turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The LOS results for the year 2018 full build -out conditions are provided in Appendix B. Proposed Development and Site Access The proposed Savona residential development is located in the northwest quadrant of the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with Hudson Boulevard in Lake Elmo, Minnesota. Based on the conceptual site plan dated April 1, 2013 (shown in Figure 3), the proposed development will consist of 190 single-family and 122 multi -family lots. It is anticipated that proposed development will be fully built -out by the year 2018. As shown in Figure 3, the conceptual site plan indicates that access to the proposed development will be via a new east -west minor collector located between 10th Street (CSAH 10) and Hudson Boulevard. This new east -west collector roadway (hereafter referred to as 5th Street) was initially identified in the City of Lake Elmo's Year 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. As part of this project, 5th Street will be constructed as a two-lane divided roadway with turn lanes provided at major intersections, from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western edge of the proposed Savona residential development (or approximately 3/4-mile west of Keats Avenue), Ultimately, 5th Street will be extended to connect to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13). However, the completion of this future connection will be dependent on the development of the adjacent properties. Figure 4 illustrates the future minor collector roadway identified in the City of Lake Elmo's Year 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan and the portion ofthe roadway (5th Street) that will be constructed as part of the proposed Savona development. Comparison of Proposed Development to Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan In order to determine if the proposed development is consistent with the land use assumptions included in the City of Lake Elmo's Comprehensive Transportation Plan, a land use comparison was completed. The proposed development is located within the transportation analysis zone (TAZ) 1229C. As shown in Table 2, TAZ 1229C is anticipated to have 796 households by the year 2030, according to the Lake Elmo 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. Table 2 Assumed Development with TAZ 1229C Year 2030 Lake Elmo Comprehensive Transportation Plan Lake Elmo TAZ 1229C 2 796 Households 2000 2030 Source: The City of Lake Elmo 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan. e45 CONCEPT DATA <,I5,t5t .5L7,5L Le-eeoe5T a,75 Pr75,5i,,,,,555trt 5.; 110 to, ,f5,,,s5d.f.125 n, = ' -4! 5-- . _ 45a- e . _ .„•,, - 1-- - .'- i ','--17-:,:r--- . , ,,.--.!=„, ir,--,7 , AA;•.ite AN'' ,, : 1 !,.,!7_,_• k---; , i -_-_, - _.-",-.amOt_Plmo, __ _ _.,...A.-r_5 - _ _ , _. _ . ,__.f---77-':-t--- ---1:-,. LENNAR Westeveral ,ofeas,onal Seee5es,ry 7.99 Anagram Dy Fden P,aine.MPI 5514a ,a1071E 95(•937,,511%) 5Ak 952-931-5i25 TOLL LREL, "R88 93/-5150 corn - - - - WIT TE 94 SAVONA LAKE ELMO. MN Conceptual Site Plan Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 420121161 Figure 3 Principal Arterial A Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Nnte, OnNnycl Nees anent:net f1.0.1t,^ VN)L141,1V5, {lot currently HI Lynne Source: City of Lake Elmo's, 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan 'Nestwood Professional S,r,occs. 7599 Anagram Drive Eden Ptairip, Mr/ 5514.3 .1i0NE 95237,5150 93Z.937,5922 IOLL1-9EE 98$-937-5150 tevee weit WOO d ni .ttnt tal oodbu Approximate limits of 5th Street to be constructed as part of the proposed Savona Development 17 Future Minor Collector Roadway Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 020121161 Figure 4 April 9, 2013 Page 11 The Savona residential development is proposing 312 new households to TAZ 1229C. This represents less than 40 percent of the assumed number of households in TAZ by the year 2030. This means that more than 60 percent of the assumed 796 households is still available for the remaining land in TAZ 1229C that is guided for residential land uses. Figure 4 shows the proposed land uses in and around TAZ 1229C. As shown in Figure 5, the proposed development accounts for more than half of the land area within TAZ 1229C that is guided residential. Therefore, the proposed Savona residential development appears to be consistent with the land use assumptions included in the Lake Elmo Comprehensive Plan. Traffic Forecasts Since the full build -out of the proposed development is assumed by the year 2018, future traffic volumes were developed for the year 2018. Year 2030 average daily traffic volumes on area roadways (based on the City of Lake Elmo and Washington County Transportation Plans) will also be presented for informational purposes. Year 2018 — No -Build Traffic Volumes The year 2018 no -build scenario assumes that the Savona site does not develop. Existing traffic volumes were increased at a rate of 1.7 percent per year in order to account for background traffic growth in the area. This growth rate was based on the current traffic volume projection factors for Washington County published by MnDOT. Year 2018 — Full Build -Out Traffic Volumes The year 2018 full build -out scenario assumes that the proposed Savona residential development is Iblly built -out. Future year 2018 full build -out volumes were developed by adding the development -related traffic from the Savona development to the Year 2018 no -build traffic volumes. Year 2030 — Traffic Volumes Washington County staff requested that forecast year 2030 traffic volumes on area roadways (based on City/County comprehensive plans) be included in the traffic study for informational purposes. Forecast year 2030 volumes were taken from the City of Lake Elmo's Year 2030 Comprehensive Transportation Plan and Washington County's 2030 Comprehensive: A Policy Guide to 2030 — Transportation. 0 Existing 149:49 Source: City of Lake Elmo's, 2030 Comprehensive Pion Westwood 1,174 ets.onal Servi(s. ,nt. 7699 A nagrlrn Driv, Eder. Prairie, tZt.I 5514a °HONE 95.2.9J7-5150 ,AX 752,937-59)2 TOLL FREE ',.898-937-5150 wlv west eroodp.. corn ". TAZ 1229C 0 1 CONCEPT LIMITS R4MUC 3, £ Comprehensive Plan Land Uses within TAZ 1229C Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 1120121161 Figure 5 April 9, 2013 Page 13 Trip Generation Trip generation estimates for the a.m. and p.m. peak periods and on a daily basis were calculated for the proposed Savona residential development. The trip generation estimates were developed based on the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Alanual, 9th Edition. The trip generation estimates for the proposed development are shown in Table 3. Table 3 Trip Generation Estimate: Savona Residential Development (I) Average AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Land Use Size Weekday - In Out 1 Total In Out 'rota Single -Family Residential 190 DUs - 1,810 36 107 143 120 70 190 Multi -Family Residential 122 DUs j 708 9 45 54 - 51 48 99 Net New Trips I 2,518 , 45 152 197 162 91 253 'hTlie trip generation estimates were based on the 2012 ITE Trip Generation Manual. 9th Edition. As shown in Table 3, the proposed Savona residential development would generate approximately 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 197 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound trips), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). The trips generated by the proposed development were assigned to the adjacent roadway system using the directional distribution shown in Figure 6. The directional distribution shown in Figure 6 was based on existing population, traffic patterns, and adjacent roadways system. The resultant year 2018 no -build and traffic volumes are shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. The forecast year 2030 traffic volumes on area roadways (based on the City of Lake Elmo and Washington County Transportation Plans) are shown in Figure 9. ase mop source: Bing Maps, Microsoft Corporation, 2013 Westwood P,ote$sionaI 7599 Anagram ()rive Ftirn PFaiFie, riti 55344 PHONE. 95Z,9,37,,5150 FA3 452,937,5822 IOU. FREE , 88B 937-5150 Directional Distribution Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 1420121161 Figure 6 &35 60 I©D C F 155°55' 44*". 60 ,215) 15 15 —► 41)11/►Hudson Blvd 110 a,©© .-11aN Hudson Blvd (20 5 100 10 175} 15 LEGEND XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Signalized Intersection All -Way Stop Control Intersection - Side -Street Stop Control Intersection se mop source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporation, 2013 V/es rood P,alessional 5-eonces, Inc. 7699 anagram Drive Edrn Prairie, Mt/ 55144 "IIONI 952-931-5150 ,AX 952-931-5922 TDII FP,LE 1 998 937 515n 4,-S'1W-:'H?It WaCl:{{Ji :OM 10 5) 50 20 135,40 Year 2018 No -Build Conditions Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 t20121161 Figure 7 LEGEND XX - A.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes (XX) - P.M. Peak Hour Traffic Volumes - Signalized Intersection - All -Way Stop Control Intersection - Side -Street Stop Control Intersection p source: Bing Mops, Microsoft Corporotion, 2013 1Nesivpood Profess,onat Services. {nc. 7699 Anagram Chive Eden Prair,e, MSJ 55344 PHONE 932,537-5150 'A% 952,-937.5821 ruli FREE '-855-937-5151) n.vvv vJPstxooyfrs.rorn . 1-94 Ramp (30) 80(215 1 [330)670 Year 2018 Build Conditions Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN 530(5)) 185((275) tN, 1-94 Ramps I I April 9, 2013 420121161 Figure 8 LEGEND XX - Lake Elmo Transportation Plan 2030 Volumes (XX) - Washington County Transportation Plan 2030 Volumes p source: Bing Maps, Microsoft Corporoticrn, 2013 W*stwood Proles' -anal 5orvtces, Inc. 7599 Anagram (hire Eden nrairin. MN 5534E QfioNr 952.937-4150 SAX 9552-917-5822 LOLL FRSE ' -888 917 5150 Year 2030 Traffic Volumes On Area Roadway System Savona Development Traffic Study Lake Elmo, MN April 9, 2013 ti20121161 Figure 9 April 9, 2013 Page 18 Future Conditions To determine how well the existing roadway system would accommodate the future traffic volumes, an a.m. and p.m. peak hour operations analysis was conducted for the year 2018 no - build and full build -out conditions. Year 2018 No -Build Conditions As shown in Table 4, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the peak hours under the year 2018 no -build conditions with existing geometries and signal timing. Table 4 Year 2018 No -Build Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 10th Street (CSAH 10) Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at North 1-94 Ramps Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at I South 1-94 Ramps Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at H d B 1 d u son ou evar l'For signalized intersections, the leiter reported represents the LOS for the entire intersection. For unsignalized intersections, the first letter reported is the LOS of the entire intersection. lvhile the second letter tin italics) is the LOS of the worst operating approach. Intersection Control All -Way Stop Keats Ave. — Free Flow Hudson Blvd. — Stop Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Level of Service (1) A.M. Peak A/B A/B P.M. Peak A/B A / C B C Traffic Signal B C Not surprisingly, the review of the vehicular queues revealed that the same minor queuing issues reported during the existing conditions on the southbound approach oflnwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 1.3) intersection with Hudson Boulevard during the p.m. peak hour will continue under the year 2018 no -build. Under year 2018 no -build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through movement will back up past the existing lefi- and right -turn lanes approximately 6 percent of the p.m. peak hour (versus 2 percent under existing conditions). However, once again the existing lagging left -turn signal phase helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The increase in the background traffic from the existing conditions and the year 2018 no -build conditions result in another potential queuing issue in the future. The review of the vehicular queues also revealed that vehicles on the eastbound dual right -turn lane of the South 1-94 Ramp April 9, 2013 Page 19 approach to the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection will extend approximately 590 feet back from the intersection. This is primarily due to the high number of existing (1,220) and fixture year 2018 (1,330) eastbound right -turning vehicles from 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 during the p.m. peak hour. However, since the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane currently has 540 feet of storage provided, the vehicular queues will only spill -out beyond the eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent ofthe p.m. peak hour. The existing traffic signal tuning at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right - turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turn/through lane during the p.m, peak hour. The LOS results for the year 2018 no -build conditions are provided in Appendix C. Year 2018 Full Build -Out Conditions A year 2018 full build -out analysis was conducted in order to determine how the existing roadway system can accommodate the proposed development -related traffic volumes. It should be noted that the year 2018 full build -out scenario assumes the existing roadway system and intersection traffic control at the key study intersections with the exception of the new intersection of Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) with 5th Street. For the purposes of the year 2018 fUli build -out analysis, the following lane configuration and traffic control assumptions where included at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street: Assumptions for the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19)/5th Street Intersection: • Northbound Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) Approach: o Free -flow o Three (3) approach lanes (consisting of 1 — left -turn lane & 2 — through lanes) Southbound Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) Approach: o Free -flow o Three (3) approach lanes (consisting of 2 — through lanes & I — right -turn lane) Eastbound 5th. Street Approach: o Stop -Controlled o Two (2) approach lanes (consisting of 1 — left -turn lane & 1 — lane) The results of the year 2018 full build -out analysis are shown in Table 5. As shown in Table 5, all intersections are expected to continue to operate at acceptable LOS C or better during the peak hours under the year 2018 full build -out conditions with the existing geometries and signal timing, and the proposed 5th Street. April 9, 2013 Page 20 Table 5 Year 2018 Full Build -Out Peak Hour Capacity Analysis Level of Service Results Intersection Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 10th Street (CSAH 10) Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 5th Street Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 1-94 North Ramps Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) at 11-94 South Ramps Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at Hudson Boulevard Keats Ave. — Free Flow 5th Street — Stop Keats Ave. — Free Flow Hudson Blvd. — Stop Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Traffic Signal Intersection Control Level of Service (1) A.M. Peak All -Way Stop A / B A/A A / B B P.M. Peak A/B A/A A/C .... . , ...... . . For signalized intersections. the letter retuned represents thc LOS for the entire intersection, For unsigmalized intersections, the first letter reported is the LOS of the entire intersection, while the second letter (in italics) is the LOS-of the worst operating approach. Similar to the no -build conditions, a review of the year 2018 full build -out conditions vehicular queues revealed that the same minor queuing issues reported on the southbound approach of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard, and the eastbound approach of the 1-94 South Ramps at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection during the p.m, peak hour. Under year 2018 no -build conditions, the vehicular queues from the southbound through movement at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 8 percent of the p.m. peak hour (versus 6 percent under no -build conditions): and the eastbound right -turning vehicles from 1-94 to southbound CSAH 19 will continue to spill -out beyond the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent of the p.m. peak hour. As previously mentioned, the existing lagging left -turn signal phase at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of this occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should continue to be monitored and adjusted as needed in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right -turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left-turn/through lane during the p.m. peak hour. The LOS results for the year 2018 kill build -out conditions are provided in Appendix D. April 9, 2013 Page 21 Secondary Access to Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) or Hudson Boulevard As mentioned previously, the proposed Savona residential development will construct a portion of 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) to the western limits of their site. As the remaining available land north of1-94 between Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13 develops, a secondary access may be needed to either Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) to the west or Hudson Boulevard to the south, in order to relieve pressure on the proposed Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. Consistent with the City's transportation plan, the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) connection will ultimately be completed as the remaining land to the west develops. Therefore, this additional analysis will focus on identifying when a secondary access to 5th Street via Hudson Boulevard may be needed based on the future traffic operations at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. The following methodology was utilized to estimate when a secondary access to 5th Street via Hudson Boulevard may be needed based on the future traffic operations at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. The forecast year 2018 full build -out traffic volumes were used as a base. The traffic volumes in/out of 5th Street were increased in 10 percent increments until the traffic operations at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street fills below acceptable LOS D. The resultant increase in traffic will then be documented, and an equivalent build -out percentage of the available land within TAA 1229C be identified. Based on the results ofthis iterative analysis, the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street can accommodate approximately 200 percent additional traffic to/from 5th Street than the year 2018 tuff build -out traffic volumes before the traffic operations of the eastbound lell- turn from 5th Street to northbound Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) breakdowns during the p.in. peak hour and delays for this movement become unacceptable. This 200 percent additional traffic during the p.m. peak period corresponds to approximately 500 additional single-family homes build -out of the available land in TAZ 1229C'. Since the City of Lake Elmo's transportation plan assumed 796 households in TAZ 1229C by the year 2030, and the proposed Savona development accounts for 312 of the assumed 796 dwelling units, a total of 484 households remain in the TAZ's allotment- before it exceeds the development level assumed in the comprehensive plan. These 484 dwelling units are approximately equal to the equivalent number of additional single- family homes that will generate enough traffic to either trigger the need for a secondary access to 5th Street, or require improvements to the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with 5th Street. Therefore, the intersection of Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and 5th Street can accommodate 100 percent (or the full build -out) of the assumed 796 dwelling units in TAZ 1229C before a secondary access is needed to relieve pressure on the intersection. It should he noted that this analysis looked exclusively at traffic operations as a trigger for the future need of a potential secondary access to serve the development along 5th Street. Other items such as fire, life. and public safety issues will also need to be considered when considering the timing/need for a secondary access. April 9, 2013 Page 22 Conclusions and Recommendations Based on our review of the proposed Savona residential development, we offer the following conclusions and recommendations for your consideration: All of the key intersections are currently operating at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. The proposed Savona residential development will consist of 190 single-family and 122 multi -family lots. It is anticipated that the proposed Savona residential development will be fully build -out by the year 2018. The proposed Savona development will generate an estimated 2,518 trips on an average weekday, 197 trips during the a.m. peak hour (with 45 inbound and 152 outbound trips), and 253 trips during the p.m. peak hour (with 162 inbound and 91 outbound trips). Under year 2018 no -build conditions, all of the key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. Under year 2018 hill build -out conditions, all of the key intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS C or better during the a.m. and p.m. peak hours, with the existing traffic control and geometric layouts. A review of the vehicular queues revealed some minor queuing issues reported on the southbound approach of Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard; and the eastbound approach of the 1-94 South Ramps at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection during the p.m. peak hour under the existing, year 2018 no -build, and the year 2018 build conditions. The vehicular queues from the southbound through movement at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH. 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard will back up past the existing left- and right -turn lanes approximately 2 to 8 percent of the p.m. peak hour (depending on the analysis year); and the eastbound right -turning vehicles from I-94 to southbound CSAH 19 will continue to spill -out beyond the existing eastbound dual right -turn lane approximately 1 percent of the p.m. peak hour under year 2018 no -build and build conditions. The existing lagging leti-turn signal phase at the Inwood Avenue (CSAH 13) intersection with Hudson Boulevard helps to minimize the negative operational impacts of the occasional blockage of the southbound turn lanes. The existing traffic signal timing at the Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) intersection with the South 1-94 Ramps should be monitored and may need to be adjusted in the future in order to minimize the likelihood of the vehicular queues of this heavy eastbound to southbound movement from spilling beyond the existing dual right -turn lanes and blocking access to the eastbound shared left- turn/through lane during the p.m. peak hour. This potential signal timing adjustment would be needed with or without the pmposed Savona development. April 9, 2013 Page 23 • Based on the results of the traffic operations analysis, the intersection of Keats Avenue (CSAH 19) and 5th Street can accommodate 100 percent (or the full build -out) of the ultimate 796 dwelling units assumed by the City's comprehensive plan to be directly served by the proposed east -west collector (5th Street) before a secondary access is needed to relieve pressure on the intersection. Therefore, the existing roadway system and traffic control will he able to accommodate the proposed Savona residential development, assuming the construction of the proposed 5th Street from Keats Avenue (CS AH 19) to the western limits of the project to provide access in/out of the site. Attachments: Appendices A — D (Traffic Counts and Detailed Operations Analysis) cc: Kyle Klatt, Lake Elmo Planning Director Jack Griffin, Lake Elmo City Engineer Joe Gustafson, Washington County Transportation Engineer 1):120121 16 IA'acs;Tre?flielhportiDRA FT Savona TIS__4-09-2013,41ocv Appendix A Peak Hour Turning Movement Volumes f s® si. .1 ics, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name : 3 Site Code : 00003001 Start Date : 3/27/2013 Page No : 1 Groups Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 1 CSAH 19 10th Street N. CSAH 19 10th Street N. Southbound , Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time , Left I Thru 1 Rtglit 1 Peds 1 A pp 7otal Left ! Thru 1 Right Peds 1 App 'Taal Left I Thru 1 Right Peds 1 App 7clal Left Thru : Right i Peds Apo Tow Inl Toial 06:30 , 0 0 0 0 0 19 27 0 0 46 15 0 8 0 23 0 12 5 0 17 86 06450 0 0 0 0 13 36 0 0 49 24 0 2 0 26 0 6 9 0 15 90 Total I 0 0 0 0 0 32 63 0 0 95 39 0 10 0 49 0 18 14 0 32 176 0700 0 0 0 0 0 18 39 0 0 57 28 1 5 0 34 1 11 5 0 17 : 108 0715 0 1 0 0 1 27 63 0 0 90 31 0 11 0 42 0 21 6 0 271 160 0730 0 0 0 0 0 17 55 0 0 72 30 1 20 0 51 1 16 11 0 28 151 07:45 0 0 1 0 1 21 58 1 0 80 33 2 10 0 45 1 21 15 0 _ 37 163 Total 0 1 1 0 2 83 215 1 0 299 122 4 46 0 172 3 69 37 0 109 582 08:00j 1 0 1 0 2 19 28 0 0 47 08:15 0 0 1 0 1 I 17 49 3 0 69 BREAK*" Total 1 0 2 0 3 I 36 77 3 0 116 *" BREAK 26 0 4 0 30 1 12 17 0 30 109 20 0 9 0 29 1 16 12 0 29 128 46 0 13 0 59 2 28 29 0 59 237 1600 1 0 1 0 2 19 21 0 0 40 24 3 22 0 49 1 36 25 0 62 153 1615 2 2 1 0 5 10 23 1 0 34 24 5 18 0 47 1 43 38 0 82 168 1630 2 1 1 0 4 14 37 0 0 51 31 1 34 0 66 4 53 52 1 110 231 1645 0 4 0 0 4 20 27 0 0 47 26 3 24 1 54 2 60 41 0 103 208 Total 5 7 3 0 15 63 108 1 0 172 105 12 98 1 216 8 192 156 1 357 760 1700 2 3 0 0 5 15 27 0 0 42 1 15 5 24 0 44 1 68 41 0 1101 201 1715 2 4 0 1 7 18 28 1 0 47 : 24 5 27 0 56 2 58 49 0 109 1 219 17:30 2 2 2 0 6 12 33 1 0 46 1 22 4 35 0 61 1 61 35 0 97 210 1745 2 2 4 0 8 11 19 1 0 31 L 29, 1 14 0 44 3 56 27 0 86 169 Total " 8 11 6 1 26 56 107 3 0 166 ! 90 15 100 0 205 7 243 152 0 402 i 799 Grand Total 14 19 12 1 46 270 570 8 0 848 402 31 267 1 701 ! 20 550 388 1 959 I 2554 Apprch % 30,4 41.3 26.1 2.2 31.8 67.2 0.9 0 57.3 4.4 38.1 0.1 , 2.1 57.4 40.5 0.1 Total % 0.5 0.7 0,5 0 1.8 10.6 22.3 0,3 0 33.2 15.7 1.2 10.5 0 27.4 I 0,8 21.5 15.2 0 37.5 Unshifted 14 19 12 1 46 270 570 8 0 848 402 31 267 1 701 20 550 388 1 959 1 2554 %Unshifted 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 10(,) 100 100 100 100 100 1 100 Bank1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 % Bank 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , 0 est fess®. fessi.nal e ic-s, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 CSAH 19 10th Street N. Southbound , Westbound Start Time Left 1 Thru Right Peds Avo Total Left 1 Thru Riot ' Peds I 12,..! Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 07:15 0 1 0 0 1 07:30 0 0 0 0 0 07:45 0 0 1 0 1 08:00 1 0 1 0 2 Total Volume 1 1 2 0 4 t!(9 App. Total 25 25 50 0 PHF .250 „250 .500 .000 .500 — C CL File Name : 3 Site Code : 00003001 Start Date : 3/27/2013 Page No :2 CSAH 19 1 10th Street N. Northbound Eastbound Left [Itn..L Right Peds Totni Left Thru RiahtH Peds Tot0 27 63 0 0 90 31 0 11 0 42 0 21 6 0 27 160 17 55 0 0 72 30 1 20 0 51 1 16 11 0 28 151 21 58 1 0 80 33 2 10 0 45 1 21 15 0 37 163 19 28 0 0 47 26 0 4 0 30 1 12 17 0 30 109 84 204 1 0 289 120 3 45 0 168 3 70 49 0 122 583 29.1 70.6 0.3 0 71:4 1.8 26.8 0 2.5 57.4 40.2 0 .778_ .810 .250 .000 .803 .909 .375 .563 .000 .824 .750 .833 .721 .000 824 ' .894 CSAH 19 Out In Total L .._ 4, 1, ill 2: 1 1 Oi Right Thru Left Peds 4 Peak Hour Data North 4 Peak Hour Begins at 07:15, Unshifted i Bank 1 4 * Left Thru Riaht Peds 120i 31 451 I 168 1. anzl Out In Total r-LAH 1.n a 0 CSAH 19 Southbound : Thr Rig Ped 1 I Start Time Left I — ,,„ I Left u ht I s Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:33 1630 2 1 1645 0 4 17:00 2 3 1715 2 4 Total Volume 6 12 % App. Total 30 60 PHF ,750 .750 1 0 4 14 0 0 4 20 0 0 5 15 0 1 7 18 1 1 20 67 5 5 35.8 .250 .250 .714 .838 z f*ssi. al ices, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 10th Street N. Westbound Thr Rig ! Ped u ht I s 37 0 0 27 0 0 27 0 0 28 1 0 119 1 0 63,6 0.5 0 .804 .250 .000 51 31 47 26 42 15 47 24 187 96 43.6 .917 .774 CSAH 19 Northbound Thr R, ight Peds 704-15 U 1 3 5 5 14 6.4 .700 CSAH 19 Out In Total 24 ,26-1, 441 11 121 61 11 Right Thru Left Peds 1 4 Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 16301 Unshtfted Bank 1 4-, TO' Left Thru Right Peds 96I 141 1091 1' 262220, I .4821 Out In Total c111:1-19 34 24 24 27 109 49.5 .801 0 1 0 0 1 0.5 .250 Left I 66 4 54 2 44 1 56 2 220 9 2.1 .833 .563 File Name Site Code Start Date Page No :3 : 00003001 : 3/27/2013 :3 10th Street N. Eastbound Thr Right Reds Ap u 53 60 68 58 239 55.3 .879 10 0 52 41 41 49 183 42.4 .880 1 0 0 0 1 0 2 250 110 103 110 109 432 Int Total 231 208 201 219 859 .982 .930 est fessiices, Inc. 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Groups Printed- Ur shifted • Bank 1 File Name : 1 Site Code : 00001001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No : 1 . 1 Keats Ave. N. 1 N. Frontage Rd. Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. ..• Southbound ' , Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Left ! Thru 1 Right i Peds i 4,,p %IA: I Left i Thru i Right i Peds i Left i Thru Right I Peds i A, 3001 Left Thru i Right ! Peds ! A, Tow Hit, Tolal i 0630 0 16 3 0 19 1 24 2 0 0 26 19 20 3 0 42 0 0 2 0 2 1 89 . 0645 0 23 2 0 25 1 21 7 1 0 29 28 26 4 0 58 0 0 2 0 2 114 Total 0 39 5 0 44 1 45 9 1 0 55 47 46 7 0 100 0 0 4 0 4 i 203 07:00 0 30 1 0 31 28 19 0 0 47 23 46 3 0 72 i 0 2 3 0 5 155 07:15 0 26 2 0 28 39 8 2 1 50 29 30 3 0 62, 1 0 2 0 3 143 07:30 0 33 6 0 39 31 7 1 0 39 44 54 3 0 101 ! 0 2 4 0 6 185 0745 2 45 7 0 54 25 13 2 0 40 40 40 6 0 86 0 1 2 0 3 183 Total 2 134 16 0 152 123 47 5 1 176 136 170 15 0 321 1 5 11 0 17 666 0800 1 2 22 3 0 27 28 7 1 0 36 1 36 25 3 0 64 1 0 0 4 0 4 1 131 0815 0 40 4 0 44 1 26 11 0 0 37 28 38 4 0 70 1 1 0 2 0 3 1 154 '"BREAK Total 2 62 7 0 71 1 54 18 1 0 731 64 63 7 0 134 1 0 6 0 7 . 285 *** BREAK 16:00 1 42 2 0 45 1 12 9 0 0 21 19 59 10 0 88 5 11 28 0 44 198 1615 2 48 2 0 52 ! 10 1 0 0 11 ! 13 55 6 0 74 4 17 31 0 52 189 16:30 0 43 1 0 44 i 10 6 0 0 16 ! 14 55 1 0 70 7 13 44 0 64 194 16:45 3 65 4 0 72 13 2 0 0 15 ! 13 57 9 0 79 3 17 44 0 64 230 Total 6 198 9 0 213 45 18 0 0 63 59 226 26 0 311 19 58 147 0 224 811 1700 1 50 1 0 52 10 2 2 0 14 17 42 9 0 68 7 22 48 0 77 211 17:15 5 80 0 0 85 5 8 1 0 14 16 54 10 0 80 4 20 43 0 67 246 1730 2 57 1 0 60 10 4 0 0 14 19 55 6 0 80 1 31 27 0 59 213 17:45 2 70 1 Oi 73 11 8 0 0 19 15 58 10 0 83 3 12 29 0 44 219 Total 10 257 3 0 270 36 22 3 0 61 67 209 35 0 311 15 85 147 0 247 889 Grand Total 1 20 690 40 0 750 303 114 10 1 428 373 714 90 0 1177 36 148 315 0 499 1 2854 Apprch % 2.7 92 5.3 0 70,8 26.6 2.3 0.2 31.7 60.7 7.6 0 7.2 29.7 63.1 0 Total % 1 0.7 24,2 1,4 0 26.3 10,8 4 0.4 0 15 13.1 25 3.2 0 41.2 1,3 5,2 11 0 17,5 Unshifted 20 690 40 0 750 303 114 10 1 428 373 714 90 0 1177 36 148 315 0 499 1 2854 %Unshifted i 109_ 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 100 100 100 0 100 I 100 Bank 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 % Bank 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 est •fssi. I ices, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. Southbound Westbound Start Time i Left ThruRioht! Peds Acp Tool Left Thru Right Peds 300. -rFc! Peak Hour Analysis From 0630 to 1145 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:00 0700 0 30 1 0 31 28 19 0 0 07115 0 26 2 0 28 39 8 2 1 07:30 0 33 6 0 39 31 7 1 0 07:45 2 45 7 0 54 25 13 2 0 Total Volume 2 134 16 0 152 123 47 5 1 % App. Total 1,3 88.2 10.5 0 69.9 261 2.8 0.6 PHF 1 .250 .744 .571 .000 .704 .788 .618 .625 .250 -3819 19.9 6 J. -Z (5' - -- File Name : 1 Site Code : 00001001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No :2 Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. Northbound Eastbound Left Thru Right Peds I ToLaf I Left Thru Right Peds 1 Acn TOtat 47 23 46 3 0 72 0 2 3 0 5 155 50 29 30 3 0 62 1 0 2 0 3 143 39 44 54 3 0 101 0 2 4 0 6 185 40 40 40 6 0 86 0 1 2 0 3 183 176 136 170 15 0 321 1 5 11 0 17 666 42.4 53 4.7 0 5.9 29,4 64.7 0 .880 .773 787 .625 _ .000 .795 .250 .625 688 .000 708 900 Keats Ave. N _Ot, In Total C 176 1 1521 328] 16. 134: 21 Q] Right Thru Left Peds 41- Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 0700 Unshifted Bank 1 4 ,Left Thru _Rohl. Peels ._,41,361 170, 15f 01 I268I 3211 589 'Out In Total i•ca1,5 Ave N fessi c s, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name : 1 Site Code : 00001001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No :3 . ; Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. Keats Ave. N. N. Frontage Rd. Southbound 1 . Westbound Northbound Eastbound Thr Rig Ped ; I . : 1 ; 1 1 1 Aprt 1 otal ' • Start Time ! Left 1 ; Thr l Rig Ped l u l ht s i Left Thr u 1 Right Peds 1 Left 1 Thr I Right Peds i 411p %tot 1 U l Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 16:45 1645 ; 3 65 4 0 72 13 2 0 0 15 13 57 9 0 79 3 17 44 0 64 230 17:00 1 1 50 1 0 52 10 2 2 0 14 17 42 9 0 68 7 22 48 0 77 211 1715 ; 5 80 0 0 85 5 8 1 0 14 16 54 10 0 80 4 20 43 0 67 246 17:301 2 57 1 0 60 10 4 0 0 14 19 55 6 0 80 1 31 27 0 59 213 Total Volume i 11 252 6 0 269 38 16 3 0 57 65 208 34 0 307 15 90 162 0 267 900 % App. Total 1 4.1 93,7 2.2 0 66,7 28.1 5.3 0 21.2 67,8 11.1 0 5,6 33.7 60.7 0 PHF I .550 .788 .375 .000 _ .791 , 731 .500 .375 .000 .950 .855 .912 .850 .000 .959_ _ _,536 ,726 .844 ,000 .867 .915 0 z (51 0 OT 2 - 0 0 Keats Ave N. Out in Total 11_1...2261; 1— *19.!495 1 6 2521 11 01 Right Thru Left Peds / I I I f + Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 1645: Unshifted Bank 1 1 Lefl Thru Ridht Peds 651 2081 341 01 452 1 307 I 7591 Out In Total Ave N ha Total f ssi ices, 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name : 2 Site Code : 00002001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No : 1 Grouos Printed- Unshifted - Bank 1 Keats Ave. N. 1-94 WB Off -Ramp Keats Ave. N. 1-94 WB On -Ramp Westbound Northbound Southbound .1 ,.........„... Eastbound Start Time Left , Thru I Right l Peds ,,,,, To, Left l Thru l Right I Peds l App Towl ' Left l Thru l Right I Peds l App ToLpt Left i Thru l Right Peds I A, Ipt. int Total , 1 06;30 0 8 33 0 41 20 0 10 0 30 244 31 0 0 275 0 0 0 0 0 346 06:45 0 16 32 0 48 38 0 20 0 58 225 41 0 0 266 0 0 0 0 0 372 Total 0 24 65 0 89 58 0 30 0 88 469 72 0 0 541 0 0 0 0 0 718 0700 0 11 48 0 59 27 0 19 0 46 284 45 0 0 329 0 0 0 0 0 434 0715 0 19 50 0 69 35 0 22 0 57 305 44 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 475 07:30 0 25 41 0 66 44 0 32 0 76 284 68 0 0 352 0 0 0 0 0 494 07:45 0 37 37 0 74 42 0 34 0 76 277 59 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 0 486 Total 0 92 176 0 268 148 0 107 0 255 1150 216 0 0 1366 0 0 0 0 0 1889 08:00 0 19 37 0 56 50 1 25 1 77 288 38 0 0 326 i 0 0 0 0 0 459 0815 0 31 38 0 69 31 0 17 0 48 243 52 0 0 295 0 0 0 0 0 412 *" BREAK *** Total 0 50 75 0 125 81 1 42 1 125 531 90 0 0 621 0 0 0 0 0 871 "' BREAK "" 16.00 0 55 16 0 71 43 1 3 0 47 148 87 0 0 235 0 0 0 0 0 353 16:15 0 76 20 0 96 69 0 5 0 74 125 69 0 0 194 0 0 0 0 0 364 16:30 0 77 21 0 98 73 1 12 0 86 158 60 0 0 218 0 0 0 0 0 402 1645 0 99 17 0 116I 74 0 3 0 77 131 75 0 0 206 0 0 0 0 0 399 Total 0 307 74 0 381 259 2 23 0 284 562 291 0 0 853 0 0 0 0 0 1518 1700 0 91 23 0 114 74 0 5 1 80 168 61 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 DI 423 1715 0 114 12 0 126 75 1 4 0 80 179 74 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 459 1730 0 77 12 0 89 46 0 8 0 54 163 78 1 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 385 1745 0 90 20 0 110 58 1 8 0 67 174 71 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 422 Total 0 372 67 0 439 253 2 25 1 281 684 284 1 0 969 0 0 0 0 01689 Grand Total 0 845 457 0 1302 i 799 5 227 2 1033 33969531043500000 0 6685 Apprch % 0 64.9 35,1 0 77.3 0.5 22 0.2 78.1 21.9 0 0 0000 Total % 0 12.6 6,8 0 19,5 ' 12 0.1 3.4 0 15,5 50.8 14.3 0 0 65.1 0 0 0 0 0 Unshifted 0 845 457 0 130279952272103333969531043500000 0 6685 %unshifted 0 100 100 0 100 100 100 _ 100 100 100 100 100 100 0 100 0 0 0 0 0 100 Bank10000 00000 0 1 0 0 0 0 00000 0 0 %Bank10000 00000 010000 00000 0 0 fessi e .c 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 File Name : 2 Site Code : 00002001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No :2 , 1 Keats Ave. N. 1-94 WB Off -Ramp Keats Ave. N. , 1-94 WB On -Ramp 1 : ,• Southbound . Westbound Northbound Eastbound In_ Start Timel Left! Thru Right I Peds ! A,. folP Left Thru Thru 1 Right I Peds I Apo Total Left Thru I Right I Peds 1 Ap, rnim I Left I Thru ! Right I Peds AR T,,ial tlotal Peak Hour Analysis From 06:30 to 11:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:15 07:15 0 19 50 0 69 35 0 22 0 57 305 44 0 0 349 0 0 0 0 0 475 07:30 0 25 41 0 66 44 0 32 0 76 284 68 0 0 352 0 0 0 0 0 494 07:45 0 37 37 0 74 42 0 34 0 76 277 59 0 0 336 0 0 0 0 0 486 08:00 0 19 37 0 56 50 1 25 1 77 288 38 0 0 326 0 0 0 0 0 459 Total Volurne 0 100 165 0 265 I 171 1 113 1 286 11542090013630000 0 1914 */°/,,pp. Total . 0 37.7 62.3 0 I 59.8 0.3 39.5 0.3 84.7 15.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 PHF .000 .676 .825 .000 .895 ; .855 .250 .831 .250 .929 .946 .768 .000 .000 .968 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .969 -E cE o cc Peak Hour Begins at 07:151 Unshifted Bank 1 4 Left Thru Riaht Peds 1. 11541 2091 01 61 1 2711 1 13631 1634I Out In Total Knntn AVP N Keats Ave. N. Out. In Total 11...%3T1 1651 100i 0! 01 Right Thru Left Peds Peak Hour Data AL. ID North 4 -7: c at) 50 0, - -I '0 • Keats Ave. N. Southbound Start Time I Left Thr I Rig Ped LeR u I ht s I Peak Hour Analysis From 12:00 to 17:45 - Peak 1 of 1 Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 17:0) 17:00 0 91 23 0 114 74 17:15 0 114 12 0 17:30 0 77 12 0 17:45 0 90 20 0 Total Volume 0 372 67 0 "/o App. Total 0 84,7 15.3 0 PHF .000 .816 .728 .000 7699 Anagram Drive Eden Prairie, MN 55344 1-94 WB Off -Ramp Westbound Thr Rig 1 Ped u 1 ht s e ces, File Name : 2 Site Code : 00002001 Start Date : 3/21/2013 Page No : 3 Keats Ave. N. 1-94 WB On -Ramp Northbound Eastbound Thr I Right Peds Thr Apo 'Total Left Right 1 Peds I u 1 1 u App TAPP Int Total 0 5 1 80 168 61 0 0 229 0 0 0 0 0 423 126 75 1 4 0 80 179 74 0 0 253 0 0 0 0 0 459 89 46 0 8 0 54 163 78 1 0 242 0 0 0 0 0 385 110 58 1 8 0 67 174 71 0 0 245 0 0 0 0 0 422 439 253 2 25 1 281 684 284 1 0 969 0 0 0 0 0 1689 90 0.7 8.9 0.4 70.6 29.3 0.1 0 0 0 0 0 .871 ,843 .500 .781 ,250 .878 ,955 .910 .250 .000 .958 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .920 Keats Ave. N. Out In :total 3fi9j 4361 r 7461 67, 372, 01 01 Right Thru Left Peds I [ Peak Hour Data North Peak Hour Begins at 1700 Unshifted Bank 1 Lett Thru Right Peds 1 6841 2841 11 01 651 1 969 1 15941 Out In Total ko.vals AVP 14 - tA) t.4 (IT _1 Appendix B Traffic Operations Analysis Summary — Existing Conditions Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Existing Conditions (AM Peak) INode Intersection Eastbound 1 Westbound 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) Lanes I <1` Volume 561 12 616 Phasing Perm SimTraffic Delay 52.3 14.1 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist, *1,478 540 SimTraffic 95th Queue 110 108 Queue Block Time (%) 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) Lanes Volume 171 Phasing Perm SimTraffic Delay 48.1 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. 470 SimTraffic 95th Queue 1 121 Queue Block Time (%) 39 Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> 42 Volume Sign Control SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 10th Street N. & CSAH Lanes Volume Sign Control SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 1 51 Stop 11.0 *2,650 21 11 </Is 1 113 Perm 19.1 7.0 B A *1,374 470 121 46 Northbound Southbound !Overall TT 1,306 106 5 266 Perm Prot 10.5 2.4 93.6 B A *837 400 460 321 25 1,154 208 Prot 16.6 6.0 B A 485 *768 271 59 4.1 A TT 4 100 166 Perm 34.4 24.0 C C B *581 300 71 1471 <Is> TT 4 TT 4 1221 471 5 136 170 15 2 133 16 Stop Free Free 14.3 2.9 1.3 0.9 2.6 1.1 0.1 B A A A A A A A *2,879 300 300 300 *823 300 83 44 3 3 9 (All -way stop) <Is 31 70 55 951 204 Stop Stop 9.7 4.8 12.3 A A *2,670 300 *2,159 39 40 72 1 126 3 Stop 7.0 4.3 9.5 1,5 A I A A A 300 I 300 *3,518 *3,518 8 I 45 12 28 1 47 11\ 1 1 2 Stop 5.2 9.9 A A 300 *2,139 8 13 A Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Existing 2013 AM Peak 'Node Intersection Eastbound Westbound 1 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) 'Lanes Volume 13 28 101 57 Phasing Prot Perm Prot SimTraffic Delay 59.3 43.4 5.2 SimTraffic LOS D A Storage / *link Dist. 215 *1,451 *1,4511 SimTraffic 95th Queue 38 54 56 'Queue Block Time (%) Northbound Southbound Overall 'I\ - T T - E TT 144 30 176 561 182 20 402 55 Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 52,0 39.2 9.9 30.0 5.1 2.5 63.2 15.9 8.5 D D A C A A B A B 250 *1,258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 53 154 29 110 85 23 57 145 39 1 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Property Traffic Study Existing Conditions (PM Peak) Intersection 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 nes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay 71.6 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. *1,479 SimTraffic 95th Queue 247 Queue Block Time (%) 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH 19 Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 39 Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes <1' > Volume 1 151 901 Sign Control 1 Stop 'SimTraffic Delay 15.6 SimTraffic LOS C Storage / *Link Dist. *2,603 SimTraffic 95th Queue 107 Queue Block Time (%) 43 l0th Street N. & CSAH 19 (All -way stop) [Lanes <11` Volume 91 239 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 13.7 SimTraffic LOS B Storage / *Link Dist. *2,627 SimTraffic 95th Queue 65 Queue Bock Time (%) Eastbound 1 Westbound Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150) 1531 16 1,220 Perm 26.4 540 355 Northbound Southbound Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150) < 253 2 25 684 Perm Perm Prot 58.0 84.9 6.3 10.8 A 1 B 470 *1,374 4701 485 167 167 281 167 TT -) E- Is 815 240 39 592 Perm Prot 10.2 4.2 119.0 6.3 A A *837 400 460 *768 271 88 11 TT TT 284 378 68 Perm 8.6 45.8 13.1 A *768 *588 300 92 203 62 Overall <Is> TT -- TT 160 371 161 3 65 210 34 11 249 6 Stop Free Free 11.1 4.1 3.0 2.0 1.0 1,1 0.1 B A A A A A A A *2,882 1 300 300 300 *812 300 ..... 38 43 10 8 3 3 <I' 186 681 119 1 Stop 7.0 10.6 3.4 A B A 300 *2,215 300 57 49 3 100 15 Stop 5.9 10.8 4.7 A 8 A 300 *3,549 *3,549 56 25 57 E- '1‘ 113 6 121 Stop 6.1 8.2 A A A 300 *2,130 19 26 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Existing 2013 PM Peak Node 'Intersection 114th St & Inwood Ave #1 Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (A) Eastbound 1 Westbound Signalized -- Cycle Length: 140) T-3 601 85 359 197 Prot Perm Prot 57.3 57,8 23.3 65.9 60.9 C I 215 *1,4511 '1,451 250 *1,258 103 125 258 141 92 Northbound Southbound 4 49 54 125• Perm 14.3 250 46 Prot 44,9 200 109 TT TT 778 110 36 751 39 Perm Prot Perm 9.3 4.3 82,4 19.0 8,4 A A i- e A '574 300 200 *1,381 200 135 26 108 252 69 2 Overall 1 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/8/2013 Appendix C Traffic Operations Analysis Summary — Year 2018 No -Build Conditions Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (AM Peak): No -Build 'Node Intersection Eastbound Westbound 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) anes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) <1". 61, 13 671 Perm 58.3 16.9. B *1,478 540 123 130 Signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) I ‹- 186 1 123 1,258 227 Perm Prot 39 Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes <T> Volume 11 51 12 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 9.6 SimTraffic LOS A Storage / *Link Dist, *2,650 SimTraffic 95th Queue 20 Queue Block Time (%) 42 10th Street N. & CSAH 19 A ay stop) Lanes <Th Volume 3 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 9.9 SimTraffic LOS A Storage / *Link Dist. *2,670 SimTraffic 95th Queue 42 Queue Block Time (%) Northbound 'I` T 1,424 14.9 13 *837 457 'Perm 48.2 54.2 7.2 19.0 7.5 A , B A 470 *1,374 470] 485 *768i 131 131 45 302 77 <Th> 1331 51 Stop 14.8 13 *2,879 93 3.1 A 300 46 Southbound - TT 116 5 290 Perm Prot 2.6 95.6 4.2 A A 400 460 *768 21 7 TT ' 1091 181 Perm 34.3 24.1 *581 300 71 157 <— -T T - € TT --> I 148 185 16 2 145, 17 Free Free 1.7 1.0 0.1 1.1 0.1 A A A A A A 300 300 300 B I <1‘ 4- , t T> 76" 60 104 222 1 137 3 51 1 11 2 Stop Stop Stop 4.7 13.0 7.5 5.2 8.8 L7 3.7 8.1 A B A A A A A A 300 *2,159 300 300 *3,518 *3,518 300 *2,139 42 74 5 51 11 30 7 13 1 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (AM Peak): No -Build Node 1 Intersection 4th St & Inwood Ave #1 Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist, SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) Eastbound I Westbound (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) <— T (-÷ T --> 13 28 101 57 144 30 176 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot 61.0 46.3 5.1 52,5 42.0 13.2 29,6 D A D D B C 215 *1,451 *1,451 250 *1,258 250 200 45 52 57 59 176 34 110 Northbound Southbound Overall - TT 561 182 20 402 55 Perm Prot Perm 5.8 3,3 50.7 17.2 A A *574 300 200 *1,381 103 23 51 160 1 8,8 A 200 421 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operation& Analysis Results Lake Elmo Property Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): No -Build Node Intersection I Eastbound I 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150 Lanes </Is -->4 Volume 16717 1,330 Phasing Perm SimTraffic Delay 73.6 47.3 SimTraffic LOS D Storage / *Link Dist. '1,479 540 SimTraffic 95th Queue 661 Queue Block Time (%) 1 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150) Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 39 Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes Volume 161 98 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 17.3 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. *2,603 SimTraffic 95th Queue I 113 Queue Block Time (%) I 43 10th Street N. & CSAH 19 (All -way stop) 174 Westbound Northbound 276 Perm Southbound Overall T T 888 262 431 645 Perm Prot 1 11.0 4.6 118.1 6.7 13 A F A *837 400 460 *768 323 93 23 TT 2 27 746 310 Perm Prot , 60.2 55.3 6.4 11.31 9.1 A 3 A 470 *1,374 470 485 *768 176 176 291 184 106 -› 412 74 Perm 49.2 18.0 *588 300 230, 70 <1.‘> TT 4 — TT 14 401 17 3 71 229 7 12' 271 7 . ... r ..• Stop Free ' I Free 11.6 4.9 3.1 A *2,882 300 48 45 1.81 0.9 1.4 A A A A A 300 300 300 8 10 I. . Lanes <1" —> <I` --) T 4 E T> 1 Volume 101 261 203 74, 130 1 109 16 123 7 13 1 Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop SimTraffic Delay 14.8 7.6 11.4 5.8 6.7 10.4 6.2 6.7 8.3 SimTraffic LOS B A 6 A A B A A A Storage / *Link Dist, *2,627 300 *2,215 300 300 *3,549 *3,549 300 *2,130 SimTraffic 95th Queue 78 57 58 9 61 26 70 21 27 Queue Block Time (%) A Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): No -Build Node !Intersection 1 ILanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) Eastbound j Westbound 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 140) --> T 65 93 391 215 53 59 Prot Perm Prot Perm 57.3 54.0 30.4 64.0 56.2 15.1 215 *1,451 *1,451 250 *1,258 250 120 130 350 156 86 47 Northbound Southbound Overall E- TT 136 848 120 39 819 43 Prot Perm Prot Perm 44,8 11.9 4.8 71.5 24,6 8.7 D B A 1 C A 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 118 163 35 120 322 67 6 Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Appendix D Traffic Operations Analysis Summary — Year 2018 Build Conditions Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (AM Peak): Build Node Intersection I Eastbound I Westbound 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) Lanes <T --) Volume 79, 131 671 Perm Phasing SimTraffic Delay 59.9 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. *1,478 SimTraffic 95th Queue 148 Queue Block Time (%) 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH 19(signalized -- Cycle Length: 120) Lanes Volume 186 186 Phasing Perm SimTraffic Delay 48.6 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist_ 470 SimTraffic 95th Queue 122 Queue Block Time (%) 34 5th Street & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes Volume 23 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 8.5 SimTraffic LOS A Storage / *Link Dist. 300 SimTraffic 95th Queue 35 Queue Block Time (%) 39 Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes 1 </r> Volume 8 5‘ Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 15.0 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. *2,650 SimTraffic 95th Queue 27 Queue Block Time (%) 42 l0th Street N. & CSAH 19 (All -way stop) Lanes <1\ Volume 31 76 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 9.6 SimTraffic LOS A Storage / *Link Dist. *2,670 SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 16.9 540 121 129 3.01 A *1,829 43 4,7 A 300 38 43 12, Northbound Southbound T T e 1 TT 1,428 116 35 305 Perm „Prot 27.3 3.1 86.2i 4.4 C A c A *837 400 460 *768 . .__ 78 12 1 <1- ee TT 1 131 1,258 249 Perm Prot 46.4 7.4 19.7 D A '1,374 470 485 122 48 294 TT 154 242 Perm 'Overall 8.9 36.0 27.0 A D C C *768 *581 300 98 95 191 - TT 38 191 Free 1.3 0.4 A A 300, 27 TT 164 Free 1.5 A A 300 A <1,> e TT e , TT' 133 511 5' 148 216, 16 2 251 40 Stop Free Free 23-0 4.8 1.8 0.7 1.1 1.5 0.5 C A , A A A A A A *2,879 300 300 300 *818 300 148 63 3 3 8 <i• e T 65 106 222 1 152 Stop Stop 12.9 9.5 5.4 8.4 1.6 B A A A A *2,159 300 300 *3,512 *3,512 77 7 55 11 27 3 5 1 11 2 Stop 5.3 6.6 A A 300 *2,139 6 12 A Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Node 1 Intersection I Eastbound 1 Westbound 4th St & Inwood Ave #13 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 110) Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 14 Prot 54,7 D 215 41 32 110 Perm 49.6 6.0 D A *1,451 *1,451 60 61 Northbound Future Year 2018 (AM Peak): Build Southbound lOverall -E. T --) <— TT --) TT 77 162 36 192 611 203 23 438 60 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 49.8 39.7 10.9 30.2 5.7 2.8 56.8 18.0 8.8 D D B C A A B A 250 *1,258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 62 165 351 109 101 23 66 159 41 il Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/5/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Property Traffic Study Node Intersection Eastbound 1 Westbound 7 1-94 South Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150) <1, 2321 Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) 17 1,330 Perm 81.7 44.4 D *1,479 540 742 528 1 8 1-94 North Ramps & CSAH 19 (Signalized -- Cycle Length: 150) 'Lanes 'Volume 276 Phasing Perm SimTraffic Delay 60.1 56.0 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. 470 *1,374 SimTraffic 95th Queue 186 186 Queue Block Time (%) 34 5th Street & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) _Lanes Volume 14 Sign Control Stop SimTraffic Delay 12.4 2.7 SimTraffic LOS 8 A lSimTraffic 95th Queue 3001 30 34 Storage / *Link Dist. *1,815 Queue Block Time (%) 39!Hudson Blvd. & CSAH 19 (Unsignalized) Lanes !ct> Volume 40 981 Sign Control Stop !SimTraffic Delay 21.1 SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. *2,603 5imTraffic 95th Queue 145 Queue Block Time (%) 43 loth Street N. & CSAH 19 (All -way stop) Lanes <Th Volume 101 261 219 821 130 1 Sign Control 1 Stop Stop SimTraffic Delay 15.1 7.9 11.4 5.2 SimTraffic LOS A 6 A Storage / *Link Dist. *2,627 300 *2,215 300 SimTraffic 95th Queue 77 64 62 4 Queue Block Time (%) 77 2 60 Perm <T> 174 401 171 Stop 12.8 *2,882 38 7.51 A 470 421 1 Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): Build Northbound I Southbound (Overall TT TT 904 262 61 654 Perm Prot 11.9 4.7 118.4 7.0 A 1- A *837 400 460 *768 381 122 22 745 391 Prot 10.4 10.7 485 *768 173 161 1`t 138 248 Free 3.9 0.8 A A 300 63 TT 71 343 37 Free 5.3 3.4 2.0 A A A 300 *588 300 44 3 9 118 16 129 Stop 6.4 8.8 51 A A A 300 *3,542 *3,542 58 25 60 T`l's 439 109 Perm 51.5 18.2 *588 300 248 87 TT -› 290 24 Free 1.6 1.0 A A A 300 5 1" 12 334 21 Free 3.8 1.6 0.3 A A A A 300 300 16 3 7 13 Stop 6.3 8.1 A A 300 *2,130 20 24 A Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/4/2013 Operational Analysis Results Lake Elmo Traffic Study Future Year 2018 (PM Peak): Build Node 1 Intersection I Eastbound 1 Westbound Northbound 4th St & Inwood Ave t$1.3 (Signalized -- Cycle Length:140) F T 4 TT 4 € TT 4 65 98 391 224 56 61 136 848 136 42 819 43 Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm Prot Perm 54.2 50.6 28.3 67.5 62.0 16.4 41.7 13.3 5.9 74.8 25.6 9.2 D D C B D B A C A C 215 *1,4511 *1,4511 250 *1,258 250 200 *574 300 200 *1,381 200 110 136 3111 165 99 49 112 179 47 100 321 34 I 8 Southbound lOvera Lanes Volume Phasing SimTraffic Delay SimTraffic LOS Storage / *Link Dist. SimTraffic 95th Queue Queue Block Time (%) Westwood Professional Services Page 1 of 1 4/8/2013