The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About09-02-08 CCMPCity of Lake Elmo 3800 Laverne Avenue North September 2, 2008 7:00 p.m. A. CALL TO ORDER B. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: C. ATTENDANCE: Johnston DeLapp Johnson Park Smith D. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: (The approved agenda is the order in which the City Council will do its business.) E. ORDER OF BUSINESS: (This is the way that the City Council runs its meetings so everyone attending the meeting or watching the ineeting understands how the City Council does its public business.) F. GROUND RULES: (These are the rules of behavior that the City Council adopted for doing its public business.) G. APPROVE MINUTES: 1. August 19, 2008 H. PUBLIC COMMENTS/INQUIRIES: In order to be sure that anyone wishing to speak to the City Council is treated the same way, meeting attendees wishing to address the City Council on any items NOT on the regular agenda may speak for up to three minutes. CONSENT AGENDA: (Items are placed on the consent agenda by city staff and the Mayor because they are not anticipated to generate discussion. Items may be removed at City Council's request.) 2. Approve payment of claims — include payroll with AP PUBLIC HEARING: , Hold public hearing and consider two grading permit applications from the Valley Branch Watershed District to repair eroding ravines and to prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond, Resolution No. 2008-041, Resolution No. 2008-042 K. REGULAR AGENDA: 4. Jason Rudnick, Rasmussen College, announces donation made in the name of the Lake Elmo Fire Department to Second Harvest for participating in their open house 5. Accept donation of Polaris vehicle and authorize use of capital funds and/or donations for ancillary equipment 6. Consider adopting a preliminary 2009 property tax levy of $2, 32,130 7. Direct the Planning Commission to discuss structures for domesticated animals and pets L. REPORTS AND ANNOUNCEMENTS: Mayor and Council members • Council member Smith — update on the Fall Festival Administrator M. UPCOMING DATE OF NOTE: • September 5 and 6 — Lake Elmo Fall Festival • September 9 — Primary Election Day (no council workshop) • September 18 -- Village AUAR Advisory Panel, 7 PM N. Adjourn City of Lake Elmo City Council Minutes August 19, 2008 Mayor Johnston called the meeting to order at 7;00 p.m Present: Mayor Johnston and Council Members DeLapp, Johnson, Park and Smith Also present: City Administrator Hoyt, Planning Director Klatt, Planner Ben Gozola, City Engineer Stempski, City Attorney Filla Finance Director Bouthilet and City Clerk Lumby. Report from August 12, 2008 closed meeting on administrator's performance review Mayor Johnston reported that in August, 2008, the City Council completed the performance appraisal for Susan Hoyt, as City Administrator for the City of Lake Elmo. The Mayor and four council members participated in completing the appraisal form, The City Administrator completed a self -appraisal as well. The overall performance for Susan was rated as exceeding expectations. The performance review categories are "City Council goals" and "competencies associated with managing the city as an organization". The review process clearly identified that Susan has the knowledge, skill and experience in performing the role of City Administrator for the City of Lake Elmo. Examples include the excellent workSusan has implemented in regards to managing the city's financial resources financial management, budgeting process and communication, providing leadership in supervising and hiring of staff and expert consultants promoting efficiencies through collaboration with other entities operating according to the principles of good government and promoting open, accessible and responsive government. APPROVAL OF AGENDA: MOTION: Council Member Johnson nioved to approve the August 19, 2008 agenda as presented Council Member Park seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. ORDER OF BUSINESS: GROUND RULES: APPROVE MINUTES: The minutes of August 5, 2008 were approved by consensus. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 PUBLIC COMMENTS/INQUIRIES; Susan Dunn, 11018 Upper 33rd Street, inquired when the city would be discussing debt reduction as suggested by the auditor, She asked when will the comprehensive plan be updated and will the update be outsourced? She also inquired about the final airport plan and the Village AUAR. Jim Blackford, 9765 451h Street N. asked for special presenter status for the landfill agenda item. CONSENT AGENDA: MOTION: Council Member Johnson moved to approve the consent agenda as presented. Council Member Park seconded the motion, The motion was passed unanimously. Approval of disbursements in the amount of $219:;059.56 REGULAR AGENDA: Engineer undates on status of current developments Ryan Stempski, City Engineer with TKDA, summarized the process to close out active developments, and detailed the status of eight current developments and will he meeting with the developers to discuss the items undone (punch list) and enforcement. The city engineers will be holding a neighborhood meeting Tuesday, August 26, 2008 to listen to the residents' concerns from the Si, Croix Sanctuary development. Pamela Chickett, 5711 Linden Avenue N., asked for a prompt resolution of the items in the Sanctuary developMent that have surpassed the August 8th time deadline for completion. Conditional job offer to Chris Klein and annrove employment status chane for Mike Cornell MOTION: Council Member Johnson moved to make conditional job offer to Chris Klein pending the outcome of his department physical and then to be placed on probationary status Yrith the fire department if. his physical is passed and to move Cornell from probationary status tQfirefighter status. Council Member Smith seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Report from Renresentative Julie Bunn and Senator Kathy Saltzman Representative Julie Bunn and Senator Kathy Saltzman recapped the 2008 legislative session by summarizing a variety of activity that was done during the sessions. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 They discussed in some detail the bonding bill for the Washington County landfill clean up and setting standards for citing landfills throughout the state. Representative Bunn explained that a portion of the landfill area could be used for park and the landfill may be covered with various prairie grasses. In addition, the PCA is exploring the use of gases to generate electricity on the site. Council Member DeLapp stated the council voted saying that it did not want the "dig and line" process put into effect instead the council asked that the garbage either be trucked away or burned. Senator Saltzman explained the cost and timing of burning the garbage is unknown and trucking it away would cost three to four times more. There is no willing community that will accept the garbage. Information from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) on the PCA decision and process for remediating the Washington County Landfill of PFC contamination. Shawn Ruotsinoja, Minnesota Pollution Control Agency (MPCA) official explained the process for "dig and line", a process that will have the agency dig up the garbage in the landfill, line a section of the landfill, and replace the garbage, This process was approved during the 2008 legislative session. Jeff Lewis, manager of the MPCA landfill remediation division, stated that the decision on the rernediation option for the Washington County landfill rested with the PCA. There is no appeal process in the decisionithat the MPCA has responsibility for cleaning the landfill and the chosen process will go forward. Peter Tiffany, senior engineer MPCA, described the three liners that will be used in the "dig and line" process making it the only landfill in the state that will have such a lining. Jim Blackford, 9765 45th Street, called for sanctions against 3M, which is one source of the contamination in the groundwater. He believes 3M should take more responsibility and be required to state when company officials knew about the contamination, Council Members DeLapp and Smith stated that this option is not a permanent solution to the contamination problem. Councilmember Smith specifically asked about the protection provided by the three layers. Consider an application from the Meehan Family, LLC for a minor subdivision (Torre Pines 2nd Addition), 2038 Inwood Avenue N. Planning Director Kyle Klatt requested City Council approval of a minor subdivision requested by the Meehan Family, LLC to create four new lots from an existing 10-acre LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 parcel within Torre Pines Addition, which is located at 2038 Inwood Avenue. The original development was approved in 1995. MOTION: Council Member Johnson moved to approve Resolution no. 2008-038 approving a 111iMI' subdivision for Torre .Pines 2Addition with conditions. Council Member Park seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Consider approval of a moving permit of an 863 sauare-foot accessory building to the Property at 4150 Irish Court North. Planning Director Kyle Klatt asked the City Council to consider a request from Marvin and Karen Lerol to permit an existing 864 square -foot accessory building to be moved from a site in Oakdale to their property at 4150 Irish Court North. The applicants have agreed to paint the accessory building in order to match the primary structure's exterior or be of an earthen tone. The acting Building Official inspected the accessory building and found the structure complies with today's building code requirements. MOTION: Council Member Johnson moved to approve Resolution 110. 2008-039 approving the moving permit to move an accessory building to the properly al 4150 Irish Court North based on the findings listed in the staff report, subject to the conditions recommended by staff Council Member Park seconded the 11101i011. The motion passed unanimously. Consider amendments to the oven space zoning code district for coveraae of impervious surface Planning Director Kyle Klatt asked the City Council to consider an amendment to the (OP) Open Space Preservation District provision in the zoning ordinance to increase the maximum impervious surface coverage allowed within this district from the current 17% up to 20% for each lo with additional provisions that would allow and increase up to a maximum of 25% coverage. Council Member Srnith pointed out Washington County regulation for impervious surface coverage is 30%and-wondered if that figure was sufficient. Steve Meads, 2928 Jonquil Trail, said the impervious surface coverage too restrictive because he cannot get a driveway big enough to get his cars into his garage even after he has reduced his patio and sidewalks. Mike Pearson, 2805 Lisbon Avenue N., installs pools and supports the proposal even though he thinks the ordinance is still restrictive. MOTION: Council Monber Johnson moved to adopt Ordinance no. 08-008 amending the definition of impervious surfaces and amending the allowable impervious surface coverage far lots excluding swimming pools in Open Space Preservation developments. Council Member DeLapp seconded the motion. Mayor Johnston and Council Members LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 4 Johnson, DeLapp, Park voted for the motion and Council Member Smith voted against the motion. MOTION: Council Member Johnson moved to adopt Resolution no. 2008-040 authorizing summary publication of Ordinance 170. 08-008 in the official newspaper. Mayor Johnston seconded the motion. The motion passed unanimously. Appeal hearing on zoning code violations related to accessory structures at 5761 Keats Avenue Mayor Johnston convened the Board of adjustment and Appeals at 10:00 p,m. City Attorney Jerry Filla reported the City Council, acting as the Board of Adjustment and Appeals, is being asked to hold an appeals hearing to determine if the accessory structure on the Ziertman property at 5761 Keats Avenue violates three sections of the zoning code (Sections 154.094, 154.092 subd 1 and 154.092, subd K) as identified by the city attorney after receiving a report from consulting planner. Ben Gozola. Notices were distributed to the property owners, the abutting neighbors and the planning commission chair as required by city ordinance. Attorney Filla reminded the Board that it must act specifically on the validity of this appeal and not act as a policy body of the city. Ben Gozola, consulting planner, presented the information on the alleged zoning code violations to the Board of Appeals. Joan Ziertman, 5761 Keats Avenue, stated that historically the City has supported the code in that a small building sheltering animals are not regulated based on the number of structures under 35 sq.ft, loCated in the city. The 35' sq.ft, accessory structure is based on very little and not regulated as an accessory structure. The threshold should be l 00 sq.ft. which requires a building permit. She believes the definition of domestic farm animals has changed because animals are not kept just for animal producing purposes but large lots have hobby farms which have animals for pets and which require buildings for shelter. The goat shed does have wind anchors, is not located closer to the road and in her opinion is not considered, an accessory structure because it is less than 35 sq.ft. and does not require a building permit. The Board discussed the appeal, the options for acting on it and timeline for removal of the non compliant structure. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 5 MOTION: Council Member DeLapp moved to have the property owners, Steve and Joan Ziertman 01'5761 Keats Avenue, remove the accessory structure (goat shed) within 90 days based on the findings: that the property located at 5761 Keats Avenue is in a rural residential zoning district and encompasses an area of approximately 10.73 acres. 2) that there are two detached accessory structures located on the property. 3) that the area of the larger detached accessory structure is between 2,499 square feet and 2,508 square feet (The maximum allowed is 2,500 square feet). 4) that the small detached accessory structure is intended to provide shelter for domesticated farm animals, 5) that the small detached accessory structure is located closer to the _front property line of the property than the principal structure on the property; Conclusion: The smaller detached accessory structure located on the property causes the property to be in violation of the City Code Sections 154,093; 154.092, subd I.. The motion passed UnarliMOUSly, Mayor Johnston adjourned the Board of Adjustment at 11:00 p.m. The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:03 p.m. LAKE ELMO CITY COUNCIL MINUTES August 19, 2008 6 ITEM: Approve disbursem City Council Date: 09/02/2008 CONSENT Item: nts in the amount of $70,643.86. SUBMITTED BY: Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director Claim # 477 478 DD1797-DD1810 32955-32976 33051-33XXX Amount $ 7953.42 $ 1251.15 $ 18,606.14 $ 8,950.14 $33,883.01 Total: $ 70,643.86 Description Payroll Taxes to IRS Payroll. Taxes to Mn Dept. of Revenue Payroll Dated 8/05/2008 (Direct Deposit) Payroll Dated 8/05/2008 (Payroll & Related Checks ) Accounts Payable Dated 08/19/2008 SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to approve disbursements in the amount of $ 70,643.86. City of Lake Elmo Accounts Payable Printed: 08/28/08 11;13 User: julie Checks for Approval Chcck Number Check Date Fund Name 33102 09102/2003 General Fund 33102 09/02/2008 General Fund 33103 09/02/2008 General Fund 33104 09/02/2008 General Fund 33104 09/02/2008 General Fund 33104 09/02/2008 General Fund 33104 09/02/2008 General Fund 33104 09/02/2008 General Fund 33105 09/02/2008 General Fund 33106 09/02/2008 General Fund 33106 09/02/200S Water 33107 09/02/2008 General Fund 33108 09/02/2008 General Fund 33109 09/02/2008 General Fund 33110 09/02/2008 General Fund 33110 09/02/2008 General Fund 33111 09/02/2008 General Fund 33112 09/02/2008 Water 33112 09/02/2008 Water 33113 09/02/2008 General Fund 33114 09/02/2008 General Fund 33114 09/02/2008 General Fund 33115 09/02/2008 General Fund 33116 09/02/2008 General Fund 33117 09/02/2008 General Fund Account Name Fire Prevention Use Tax Payable Repairs/Maint Contractual Eqpt Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg Uniforms Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg Repairs/Ivtaint Contractual 131dg Uniforms Legal Services Equipment Parts Small Tools & Minor Equipment Software Support Sign Repair Materials Assessing Services Equipment Parts Equipment Paris Equipment Parts Chemicals Chemicals Office Supplies Recycling Supplies Use Tax Payable Conferences & Training Miscellaneous Legal Services Vendor Name Alert -All Alert -All Alex Air Apparatus, Inc Aramark Aramark Aramark Aramark Ararnark Campbell Knutson P.A. Car Quest Auto Parts Car Quest Auto Parts City of Roseville Earl F. Andersen, Inc. FXL, Inc. Gopher Bearing Gopher Bearing Grainger HACH Company HACH Company Hawk Labeling Systems Ink Head, Inc. Ink Head, Inc. International Code Council [TER'S Inc. Jardine, Logan & O'Brien Chcck Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Chcck Total: Check Total: Check Total: Chcck Total: Check Total: Check Total; Check Total; Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Chcck Total: Check Total: Page 1 Amount 1,027.85 -62.73 965.12 2,161.14 2,161.14 25.25 34.37 26.44 19.43 34.37 139.86 543.75 543.75 22.63 10.31 32.94 1,380,83 1,380.83 469.53 469.53 2,000,00 2,000.00 10.00 24.55 34.55 67.42 67.42 185.36 8.47 193.83 146.01 146.01 1,104,28 -67.40 1,036.88 160.00 160.00 5,620,38 5,620.38 725.00 725.00 City efLakeEi User: ;Mlle Check Number Check Date Fund Name 33118 09/02/2008 General Fund 33119 09/02/2008 Developer 33120 09/02/2008 General Fund 33120 09/02/2008 General Fund 33121 33121 33121 33121 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 City Facilities Surface Water Utility General Fund General Fund 33122 09/02/2008 General Fund 33122 09/02/2008 General amd 33123 33123 33123 09/02/2003 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 General Fund General Fund General Fund 33124 09/02/2008 General Fund 33124 09/02/2008 General Fund 33125 33125 33125 33125 33125 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund 33126 09/02/2008 General Fund 33127 09/02/2008 General Fund 33127 09/02/2008 General Fund 33128 09/02/2008 General Fund 33129 33129 33129 33129 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 09/02/2008 General Fund General Fund General Fund General Fund 33130 09/02/2008 General Fund Accounts Payable Checks for Approval Account Name Miscellaneous Deposits Payable Office Supplies Use Tax Payable Buildings and Structures Utility System Tvlaint Supplies Building Repair Supplies Equipment Parts Equipment Parts Use Tax Payable Legal Services Civil Attorney Criminal Legal Services Cable Operation Expense Cable Operation Expense Legal Publishing Legal Publishing Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Legal Publishing Newsletter/Website Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg Repairs/Maint Contractual Bldg Equipment Parts Office Supplies Office Supplies Office Supplies Miscellaneous Miscellaneous Vendor Name Karen Ray Associates Landmark, Inc. LOFFLER LOFFLER Menards Oakdale Menards - Oakdale Menards - Oakdale Menards - Oakdale Metro Fire Metro Fire Peterson Fram & Bergman Peterson Fram & Bergman Peterson Fram & Bergman Steven Press Steven Press RiverTown Newspaper Group RiverTown Newspaper Group RiverTown Newspaper Group RiverTown Newspaper Group RiverTown Newspaper Group Rogers Printing Services Diane Rud Diane Rud Chc:ck Total: Check Total; Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total; Ruffridge Johnson Equipment Co Check Total: S&T Office Products, Inc, S&T Office Products, Inc. S&T Office Products, Inc. S&T Office Products, Inc. Sam's Club Check Total: Primed; 08/28/08 1:13 Pane 2 Amount 2,010.00 2,010.00 1,500.00 1,500.00 133.71 -7.19 126.52 51.77 129.46 50.96 55, 15 287.34 342_32 -1.55 340.77 2,080.50 5,011,10 33.00 7,124.60 58,88 69,92 128.80 38.35 23.60 17.70 11,80 8.85 100.30 1,479.29 1,479.29 240.00 240.00 480.00 769.86 769.86 127.69 450.23 56.70 11.98 646.60 59.13 City of Lake Elmo Accounts Payable Printed: 08/28/08 11:13 User: julie Checks for Approval Check Number Check Date Fund Name 33130 09/02/2008 General Fund 33130 09/02/2008 General Fund 33131 09/02/2008 General Fund 33132 09/02/2008 General Fund 33133 09/02/2008 General Fund 33133 09/02/2008 General Fund 33133 09/02/200$ Sewer 33134 09/02/2008 General Fund Account Name Office Supplies Miscellaneous Telephone Street Maintenance Materials Telephone Telephone Telephone Uniforms 33135 09/02/2008 General Fund Miscellaneous Vendor Name Sam's Club Sam's Club Sprint T.A. Schifsky & Sons TDS METROCOM - MN TDS METROCOM - MN TDS METROCOM - MN Titan Apparel & Sportswear Volunteer Firefighter's Assoc. Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check Total: Check 'Total: Report Total: Amount 84.80 45.31 189,24 68.25 68,25 326.56 326.56 154.89 75,01 103.14 333.04 1,936.60 1,936.60 358.00 358.00 33,883.0 I Page 3 ITEM: REQUESTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: City Council Oaba:A'2'08 PUBLIC HEARING Resolution No.2O08-O41 &20O8-042 Item: J-3 Hold apublic hearing and consider two grading permit applications from the Valley Branch Watershed District horepair eroding ravines and tn prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goeboohn|Pond. Valley Branch Watershed District, Applicant KeUiMabzak.City Planner Susan Hoyt, City Administrator Ryan Stempski'City Engineer SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The City Council is being asked to hold a public hearing and consider two grading permit requests submitted by the Valley Branch Watershed District to repair eroding ravines and to prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goetnchn| Pond. The projects will take place at two different sites to address erosion issues that occur largely due to the natural drainage ways atthe sites, The first site ialocated atthe private property of920010`hStreet North and the second site is located on five private properties in the Fields of St. Croix subdivision. The VBWD is seeking Temporary Project Easements on all private properties to obtain access tnduthe work. Staff inrecommending approval ofthe request because: The projectisinbendodhofixexiodngernsionisuueothroughravine,eo1oradonend associated grading work to prevent sediment from washing into local water bodies. There is a public benefit associated with the repair and the improvements of the ravines. The work proposed atthe two project siteswiUsbabi|izndhem|opeuoftheoreekoand improve water quality otGoose Lake and Gnetaohe| Pond. Nowork will occur onprivate property without asigned and recorded Temporary Project Easement. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION The city engineer has reviewed the applicant's requests and found that the grading proposed at the two sites would be in the public's interest. The city forester reviewed the construction documents and made site visits to the projectareas. She identified her concerns regarding the impacts to the root system of existing trees at the sites and requested aplan identifying the trees and the proposed fencing. The concerns were addressed bythe applicant. The Lake Elmo City Code requires agrading permit for work resulting inthe moving ofmore than 50 cubic yards of material if located outside wetlands, flondp|ains, or the mhone|and district. A RECOMMENDATION: Approval is recommended as follows because the request for two grading permits by the Valley Branch Watershed District would be in the public's interest. 1. It isrecommended that the City Council approve the grading permit requests with the following conditions: 1) All Temporary Project Easements must be signed and recorded prior to issuing the permit 2) The City ofLake Elmo must benotified 48hours prior hnconstruction. 3> All work is to remain within Temporary Project Easements. 4) A copy of the construction schedule and notice of the schedule must be provided to all neighborhood residents and the Lake Elmo City HaU, city engineer, and public works department. SUGGESTED MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION: Move to approve Resolution No. 2008-04Yand 2008-042 approving grading permits submitted by the Valley Branch Watershed District to restore ravines and to prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond. ORDER DFBUSINESS: Introduction Report by staff Questions/Comments from the applicant - Open the pubic hearing - Close the public hearing - Call for oMotion (required for further discussion; does not imply approval of the motion ................ ........................... ---......... Mayor facilitates - Discussion Mayor facilitates Susan Hoyt, City Administrator Kyle Klatt, Planning Director ...... Mayor & Council Members Mayor facilitates ATTACHMENTS: 1. Resolution No. 20O8-041 2. Resolution No. 2008'D42 3. Location Map - Site One 4� Location Map — Site Two 5. Detailed Staff Report O. Land Use Application Form Mayor facilitates CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2008-041 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRADING PERMIT TO VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT AT 9200 10TH STREET NORTH TO RESTORE A RAVINE AND TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM WASHING INTO GOOSE LAKE WHEREAS, the Valley Branch Watershed District has requested a grading permit to allow the movement of more than 400 cubic yards of material per acre of site area at 9200 10th Street North in the R-R zoning district. WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on September 2, 2008; and made the following findings: The project is intended to fix existing erosion issues through ravine restoration and associated grading work to prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake. There is a public benefit associated with the repair and the improvements of the ravine. The work proposed at the project site will stabilize the slopes of the creeks and improve water quality at Goose Lake. No work will occur on private property without a signed and recorded Temporary Project Easement. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby approves a grading permit at 9200 1 Oth Street North; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the approval of the requested grading permit shall include the following conditions: 1) All Temporary Project Easements must be signed and recorded prior to issuing the permit. 2) The City of Lake Elmo must be notified 48 hours prior to construction. 3) All work is to remain within Temporary Project Easements. 4) A copy of the construction schedule and notice of the schedule must be provided to all neighborhood residents and the Lake Elmo City Hall, city engineer, and public works department. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo on the 2nd day of September 2008, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Mayor Dean Johnson ATTEST: Susan Hoyt City Administrator (SEAL) CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2008-042 A RESOLUTION APPROVING A GRADING PERMIT TO VALLEY BRANCH WATERSHED DISTRICT FOR WORK AT 4768 LARKSPUR LN N, 4854 LINDEN TRL N, 4910 LINDEN TRL N, 4886 LINDEN TRL N, AND OUTLOT D OF THE FIELDS OF ST CROIX SUBDIVISION TO RESTORE A RAVINE AND TO PREVENT SEDIMENT FROM WASHING INTO GOETSCHEL POND WHEREAS, the Valley Branch Watershed District has requested a grading permit to allow the movement of more than 400 cubic yards of material per acre of site area at 4768 Larkspur Lane North, 4854 Linden Trail North, 4910 Linden Trail North, 4886 Linden Trail North, and Outlot D of the Fields of St. Croix Subdivision in the R-R zoning district (Open Space Preservation Development). WHEREAS, the City Council held a Public Hearing on September 2, 2008; and made the following findings: The project is intended to fix existing erosion issues through ravine restoration and associated grading work to prevent sediment from washing into Goetschel Pond. There is a public benefit associated with the repair and the improvements of the ravine, The work proposed at the project site will stabilize the slopes of the creeks and improve water quality at Goetschel Pond. No work will occur on private property without a signed and recorded Temporary Project Easement. NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Lake Elmo City Council hereby approves a grading permit at 4768 Larkspur Lane North, 4854 Linden Trail North, 4910 Linden Trail North, 4886 Linden Trail North, and Outlot D of the Fields of St. Croix Subdivision; and, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the approval of the requested grading permit shall include the following conditions: 1) All Temporary Project Easements must be signed and recorded prior to issuing the permit. 2) The City of Lake Elmo must be notified 48 hours prior to construction. 3) All work is to remain within Temporary Project Easements. 4) A copy of the construction schedule and notice of the schedule must be provided to all neighborhood residents and the Lake Elmo City Hall, city engineer, and public works department. This resolution was adopted by the City Council of the City of Lake Elmo on the 2nd day of September 2008, by a vote of Ayes and Nays. Mayor Dean ohnson ATTEST: Susan Hoyt City Administrator (SEAL) Approximate Grading _ -1 Location 10th Street N Site 1 9200 10th Street North r- 5' —I 0 /*Approximate Gradin4, Location Goetschel Pond Site 2 4768 Larkspur Ln N 4854 Linden TrI N 4910 Linden TrI N 4886 Linden TrI N Outlot D, Fields of St. Croix To: From: Meeting Date: Applicant: Owners and Location of Site 1: Zoning: Owners and Location of Site 2: Zoning: City of Lake Elmo Planning Department Grading Review City Council Kelli Matzek, City Planner 9/2/08 Valley Branch Watershed District David and Diane Zimmerhakl, 9200 10111 Street N RR — Rural Residential Julie and Michael Nelson, 4768 Larkspur Lane N Kevin Tholen, 4854 Linden Trail N Karen Jorgensen, 4910 Linden Trail N Robert and Marita Metcalf, 4886 Linden Trail N Fields of St. Croix Association, Outlot D RR — Rural Residential (Open Space Preservation Development) Introductory Information Request The Valley Branch Watershed District is requesting grading permits from the city to do work at two different sites. The first site is located at 9200 10111 Street North. The project is to repair an eroding ravine and to prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake. The second grading site is located on four privately owned parcels and Outlot D in the Fields of St. Croix subdivision. The VBWD is proposing to repair an eroding ravine and to prevent sediment from washing into Goetschel Pond. Site Data for Property Identification No. Site 1: 27-029-21-34-0001 Site Data for Site 2: Property Identification No. 17-029-21-11-0015 12-029-21-11-0014 12-029-21-11-0013 Address Use 9200 10th Street N Residential Dwelling Address 4768 Larkspur Lane N 4854 Linden Trail N 4910 Linden Trail N Use Residential Dwelling Residential Dwelling Residential Dwelling 12-029-21-11-0012 12-029-21-14-0005 4886 Linden Trail N 4670 Linden Trl N Residential Dwelling Outlot D Excavation and Grading Permit Review Background Site one is located at 9200 10'1' Street. At this site there is a natural ravine that flows Information: only in the spring and in large rain events. There is a culvert underneath 10th Street connecting the two areas of Goose Lake (north and south of the roadway), but as you move up the ravine, the well formed ravine disappears. At this site the slopes change quickly from relatively flat to a steeper slope which causes the erosion. Site two is located in the rear yards of four private residential properties and onto an outlot owned by the Fields of St. Croix Association. This erosion was caused by two factors. The first is the existing north facing slope which, by nature, has thinner vegetation due to less sunlight. The second factor is the stormwater pond at the top of the ravine that wears away the toe of the slope as it discharges water. The combination of those two factors has resulted in a slope failure. The proposed project at both site one and site two were initiated by concerns from the property owners adjacent to the two water bodies. The intent of both projects is to stabilize existing, eroding ravines and to prevent sediment from washing into the two water bodies — Goetschel Pond and Goose Lake. Review Comments: PlanninThe Lake Elmo city code requires a permit for any excavating, grading, filling, or g other changes in the earth's topography resulting in the movement of more than 50 Issues: cubic yards of material. Grading and excavation plans that result in the moving of 400 cubic yards of material per acre of site area require a public hearing and approval of the City Council. Because the proposed projects are located entirely on privately owned property, thc Valley Branch Watershed District must receive permission from the property owners to both access the site and to perforin the work. Access to the grading sites will be obtained by the VBWD by a signed and recorded Temporary Project Easement document. As of the writing of this report, city staff has not received copies of any signed Temporary Project Easements. The watershed district must obtain these signed easements from all property owners prior to issuing the permit. Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the requested grading permits for the following reasons: • The project is intended to fix existing erosion issues through ravine restoration and associated grading work to prevent sediment from washing into local water bodies. • There is a public benefit associated with the repair and the improvements of the ravines. The work proposed at the two project sites will stabilize the slopes Engineer Comments: of the creeks and improve water quality at Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond. No work will occur on private property without a signed and recorded Temporary Project Easement. Thc City Engineer has reviewed the application and supports staffs recommendation of approval with four conditions to be added to the permit: 1) All Temporary Project Easements must be signed and recorded prior to issuing the permit. 2) The City of Lake Elmo must be notified 48 hours prior to construction. 3) All work is to remain within Temporary Project Easements, 4) A copy of the construction schedule and notice of the schedule must be provided to all neighborhood residents and the Lake Elmo City Hall, city engineer, and public works department. City Forester The City Forester reviewed the construction documents and made site visits to the Comments: project areas. She identified her concerns regarding the impacts to the root system of existing trees at the sites and requested a plan identifying the trees and the proposed fencing. The concerns were addressed by the applicant. Conclusion: Conclusion: Staff is recommending that the City Council approve the grading per nit request based on the findings cited above and with conditions. The Valley Branch Watershed District is seeking approval of two grading permits to allow the grading of more than 400 cubic yards to repair eroding ravines and prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond. Council The City Council may consider the following options for taking action on this request: Options: Staff Rec: A) Approve the grading permits based on the findings drafted by Staff or other additional information that is presented at the public hearing; B) Deny the requests based on findings provided by the council. Staff recommends approval of the grading pennit request based on the following: 1) The project is intended to fix existing erosion issues through ravine restoration and associated grading work to prevent sediment from washing into local water bodies. 2) There is a public benefit associated with the repair and the improvements of the ravines. The work proposed at the two project sites will stabilize the slopes of the creeks and improve water quality at Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond. 3) No work will occur on private property without a signed and recorded Temporary Project Easement. Provided the following conditions are met 1) All Temporary Project Easements must be signed and recorded prior to issuing the pei init. 2) The City of Lake Elmo must be notified 48 hours prior to construction. 3) All work is to remain within Temporary Project Easements. 4) A copy of the construction schedule and notice of the schedule must be provided to all neighborhood residents and the Lake Elmo City Hall, city engineer, and public works department. Approval To approve the request, the City Council is asked to use the following motion as a Motion guide: Template: Move to approve Resolution 2008-041 and 2008-042 approving the grading permit applications from the Valley Branch Watershed District to repair eroding ravines and prevent sediment from washing into Goose Lake and Goetschel Pond...(use staff findings provided above or cite your own) ...with the conditions outlined by staff. cc: Michael Nelson, 4768 Larkspur Lane N Kevin Tholen, 4854 Linden Trail N Karen Jorgensen, 4910 Linden Trail N Metcalf, 4886 Linden Trail N David and Diane Zimmerhakl, 9200 10 Street N Fields of St. Croix Homeowners Association Fee $ City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM E Comprehensive Plan Amendment Li Variance * (See below) 0 Zoning District Amendment 0 Text Amendment 0 Flood Plain C.U.P. Conditional Use Permit 0 Minor Subdivision LI Lot Line Adjustment El Residential Subdivision Sketch/Concept Plan 0 Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) E3 Site & Building Plan Review APPLICANT: (Name) TELEPHONES: ct - (Home) FEE OWNER: (Name) TELEPHONES: (Home) Viitt./ (Mailing Address) (Work) (Mailing Address) r 0, (Mobile) (Work) (Mobile) El Residential Subdivision Preliminary/Final Plat O 01 — 10 Lots O 11 — 20 Lots O 21 Lots or More Excavating & Grading Permit E Appeal E PUD PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): / 0 L. DETAILED REASON FOR REQUE6T: /I I, l i 1 •-,1 , 1/ ve_e.a. . , i *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, the Applicant must demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows: &i i 717.—i, / sr) e f (Fax) (Fax) 1 2 0 2-9 .7 7 1 C) i 2_ et '72:_"1 2- c, . ti/Y (Zip) (Zip) ) I 1 )C) c. In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the c,r Zoning and Su division Ordinances and current administrative procedures. 1 further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in theoplication prgfts and hereby agree to pay all statements received from the City pertaining to ad1Iitilna1 appll cation ' Sipttire af Applicant Signature of Applicant Date 1/22/2004 City of Lake Elmo • 3800 Laverne Avenue North • Lake Elmo • 55042 • 651-777-5510 • Fax 651-777-9615 Fee $ City of Lake Elmo DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION FORM L Comprehensive Plan Amendment Li Variance (See below) Ell Zoning District Amendment 7 Text Amendment LJ [11 Minor Subdivision Lot Line Adjustment 7 Flood Plain C.U.P. E ,Residential Subdivision Conditional Use Permit Sketch/Concept Plan Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) E Site & Building Plan Review APPLICANT: LI F4,4,1,,, V 3 P. 0 i). (Name) (Mailing'Address) TELEPHONES: (Home) (Work) (Mobile) FEE OWNER: t-Lr- („20 i 0 4-1,, S , (Name) (Mailing Address) TELEPHONES: (Z 5 - 7 ')/ - T'TL (Horne) (Work) (Mobile) PROPERTY LOCATION (Address and Complete (Long) Legal Description): 72—r) DETAILED REASON FOR REQUEST: ( 402— 2-> I 1 Lir‘•- e- / _I= .0 a C.',.4.----1-- -7), 4' ‹.,,,,f_ ; ,,,,,,,, • 'IL 4:::--e71-7.,..- l.,1"79-.41 41, :.-1.4 :',,,evAA F \ j I( C-- e.,-/5. Le ,,--e- ,e1.--,v , - „, 4-i,,,,.,— 1-1 4.) 0 ,,,,,, 0/ s ,,... e--- / *VARIANCE REQUESTS: As outlined in Section 301.060 C. of the Lake Elmo Municipal Code, theApp1icantmust demonstrate a hardship before a variance can be granted. The hardship related to this application is as follows: E Residential Subdivision Preliminary/Final Plat O 01 — 10 Lots O 11 — 20 Lots O 21 Lots or More IM Excavating & Grading Permit Ej Appeal El PUD (Fax) (Fax) 2-1A.1 C1 (Ziia) • (-7/"'4 S-50'1 z (zip) tl c-f a In signing this application, I hereby acknowledge that I have read and fully understand the applicable provisions of the Zoning and Sub ivision Ordinances and current administrative procedures. I further acknowledge the fee explanation as outlined in the a lication o res and hereby auree to nav all statements received from thc City pertainin2- to additional arm I III ,11.1, Signature of Applicant Date 1/22/2004 City of Lake Elmo • 3800 Laverne Avenue North • Lake Elmo • 55042 • 651-777.5510 • Fax 651-777-9615 City Council Dote: 8-02-08 REGULAR |tem� 4 Informational ITEM: Announce donation made byRasmussen College SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: Jason Rudnick, Rasmussen College, will bein attendance to announce its donation made in the name of the Lake Elmo Fire Department to Second Harvest for participating in Rasmussen CoUegn'a open house. City Council Dahs:S2O0 REGULAR Item: .6 Motion ITEM: Consider acceptingadonation ofaPolaris fire rescue unit and approving purchase ofrelated equipment SUBMITTED BY., Greg Malmquist, F}os Chief REVIEWED BY: Maintenance Advisory Committee (MAC) Susan Hoyt, City Administrator SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTED: The city council is being asked to accept the donation ofthe Polaris fire rescue unit that was applied for through ogrant application and awarded to the city because itprovides apublic safety benefit for off road fire suppression, rescue operations and patient transport from remote locations; it is also useable on ice. In ddiU the i i| kabeing asked hoauthorize the purchase ofequipment for the vehicle eta cost of$[3from the city's2808 capital improvement plan (C|P) and from funds raised outside of the C|P, if possible. This request was evaluated and recommended byMAC. ADDITIONAL INFORMAT(ON Prior odycouncil action and referral to MAC In December, 2OQ7the city council authorized applying for the grant for the Polaris vehicle with the intent that, if awarded, and prior tV acceptance that: 1)MAC would review the value ofthe equipment and 2)a funding source for additional equipment required to make the vehicle function to its maximum capacity. /n retrospect, the staff recognizes that itwould have been most prudent hohave the MAC review the value of applying for the grant rather than waiting until after the grant was awarded to the city, This is the process that will be used inthe future and MAC concurs with this approach. Vehicle Use. The vehicle will beused for: Fire suppression, rescue operations and patient transport inremote areas, not only inLake Elmo, but throughout the region. This will also be the only vehicle in our fleet capable of traveling on the ice, Based on a 5 year average the city responds tnapproximately 25-3Oofthese "h/pe^of calls per year. VVeknow, however, that there are more but based on 'coding" they are not reflected, Also, we know this number will increase with regard to mutual aid and increased use of the pork system. New RKO Fire Resrue Unit New Slip In Fire Rescue Unit to fit �� cmC��o�� '""n=~ integral *"imcell, High performance fire pump with qm COST OF THE EQUIPMENT The Polaris fire rescue unit has a value of $ 12,300 and is being donated to the city. The equipment will require fuel and general maintenance to operate. In addition, some ancillary equipment is necessary to use it to its full capacity and effectively. This must be provided by the city. The equipment is as follows: ITEM Trailer Fire/Rescue Skid Unit Lighting — Emergency and Misc. — Stokes, tie downs, windshield, etc. Total Cost Funding sources Donations DNR Grant Walmart/Sams Grant ESTIMATED $ 1,500.00 - $2,200.00 $10,000.00 scene $ 750.00 $ 1,000.00 $ 13,250 - $ 13,750 TBD TBD TBD Capital funds from 2008 budget as needed Remaining balance from computer $ 700 Reduction in turnout gear from $ 4,500 $9,000 to $4,500 Reduction in station 1 and 2 $ 8,550 remodeling from $40,419 RECOMMENDATION FROM MAC For skid unit $10,000 For lights, trailer and miscellaneous Do not need the entire component budgeted for Postpone all purchases in 2008 until 2009 To accept the donation of the Polaris fire rescue unit because it serves the public health and safety. To acquire the ancillary equipment to make the unit function at its maximum and best capacity to serve the community. To seek out grant funds to cover some or all of the costs of the equipment but to use funds from the following budgeted capital sources in order of priority: 1) reduction of $4,500 in turnout gear; 2) reduction in station 1 and 2 remodeling costs; and, last, 3) consider postponing the thermal imaging camera for one year (but this is the least favorable option) SUGGESTED MOTION FOR CONSIDERATION Move to accept the donation of a Polaris Fire Rescue Unit valued at $12, 500 and apply for grants to fund some or all of the ancillary equipment: and, if grants and donations do not cover the $13, 750 (maximum) equipment costs, authorize the administrator to approve the use of capital funds according to the following amounts and priority: 1) the remaining balance in the laptop (estimated $700), 2) turnout gear budget savings (est. $4, 500) and 3) from savings in station 1 and station 2 remodeling projects (est. $ 8,550). 2 ORDER OFBUSINESS Introduction Susan Hoyt, City Administrator Report Greg Malmquist, Fire Chief Bud Ta|nott.MAC Chair (if hewants hospeak) Questions tothe presenters Mayor and CuuncUmemben; (3 minutes) Questions/comments from the public, to the council (3 minutes) Mayor facilitates Call for amobon Discussion xomn Mayor and Counci|members Draft Copy CITY of LAKE ELMO MAINTENANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Minutes of August 26, 2008 Present:, Dick Gustafson, George Dege, Chuck Stanley, Steve Gurney, Steve Ziertman, Bud Talcott, Gregg Malmquist, Guests: Doug Pepin, Brad Wilkins, Members of the Fire Department The meeting was called to order at 7:05pm at the Fire Station #1 by Bud Talcott. The agenda was reviewed and no changes made. Greg reviewed the Polaris Ranger they have received on the Grant. Gregg said it was from USST who this year had money to give 75 units out, but then found they had enough to award another one which we got. He reminded us that this was discussed back in 2000 as unit that someday would be beneficial to have. He stated he has received support form all the surrounding communities as well as the county and Julie Bunn. This unit will be used not only for our needs but for mutual aid. Greg stated they plan to use it in search and rescue for remote hard to reach area's where they cannot get any of the existing equipment in, such as in the regional park, trails, and in winter on the ice, In the winter they do not drive vehicles on the ice. When these emergencies occur at present must walk, which causes delay in getting the injured person assistance. We asked for specific examples, which Gregg and the other firefighters shared. A couple of which were a horse rider who was thrown off deep in the park, another was a couple of snowmobiles that collided on the lake. In cases like these the Polaris Ranger would have gotten them to the scene and the victim help much quicker. Gregg discussed the skid unit they are requesting to be installed on the back. It has areas to carry their equipment, injured persons, as well as a water tank and pump to allow its use on small fires. Gregg said when a fish house burns they have no way of putting it out. They still must to go out and check that no one is trapped inside. He also mentioned small fires that are in areas inaccessible for larger rigs, such as in the park or behind houses, on trails, that this unit could easily access . Geo D asked about the low profile of the unit and its ability to operate in snow, anything over 1ft would make it impractical. Gregg stated they would follow trails already cut through the snow. The lighting requested would be basic consisting of emergency beacon, spot lights and area lights to Illuminate the scene. The trailer would be as basic as possible to carry the Ranger. It would be pulled behind the grass rig when it went out. Page 2 MAC Meeting March 7, 2007 A discussion of funding consisted of review of the items on the 2008 CIP. Gregg stated they did not get a full roster so do not need the new turnout gear this year. The imaging camera cause quite a bit of discussion in that our existing is getting old and might fail, and having it can save lives. Gregg stated if it failed they would send it in for repair and could borrow one from the vendor. The consensus was to try to keep it in the budget if possible by reducing the upgrade budget for station #1. Greg said this dollar figure is if the city had to pay for it all, he is contacting organizations to try to get donations to help. A Motion was made by George D, seconded by Steve G to recommend acceptance of the grant of the Polaris Ranger contingent on approval of additional equipment to make it fully operational for rescue and fire suppression. The motion Passed 5-0 with Steve Z unable to vote as alternate. A Motion was made by Steve G, seconded by Chuck S to recommend the purchase of ail the equipment items as outlined in the Fire Dept list of "Additional Equipment". The Motion passed 5-0 A Motion was made by Chuck S and seconded by Steve G to recommend the funding for the additional equipment come from CIP sources in the priority as established by the Fire Dept personal, A. Remove turn out gear from 2008 to 2009 B. Reduce the upgrade to Fire Station #1 as needed C. Remove Imaging Camera if needed from 2008 to 2009 The Motion Passed 5-0 Hearing no objections the meeting was adjourned at 8:10pm. Respectfully submitted, Bud Talcott, Chairman/ Secretary CITY of LAKE ELMO MAINTENANCE ADVISORY COMMITTEE Recommendations for Fire Dept request of Polaris Ranger Mac reviewed the request with the following findings and recommendations. The Polaris Ranger will be a valued addition at a minimal cost to the Fire Dept fleet. It will provide access to remote hard to reach areas within our city such as parks, off trails and on lakes in the winter. Resulting in 1. Provide quicker response and help to injured persons. 2. Speed up searches for lost persons such as a child in the park reserve. 3. Allow access to fires in areas larger equipment cannot get to. Based on our complete review we wish to make the following recommendations. A Motion was made by George D, seconded by Steve G to recommend acceptance of the grant of the Polaris Ranger contingent on approval of additional equipment to make it fully operational for rescue and fire suppression. The motion Passed 5-0 with Steve Z unable to vote as alternate. A Motion was made by Steve G, seconded by Chuck S to recommend the purchase of all the equipment items as outlined in the Fire Dept list of "Additional Equipment". The Motion passed 5-0 A Motion was made by Chuck S and seconded by Steve G to recommend the funding for the additional equipment come from Cf P sources in the priority as established by the Fire Dept personal, A. Remove turn out gear from 2008 to 2009 B. Reduce the upgrade to Fire Station #1 as needed C. Remove Imaging Camera if needed from 2008 to 2009 The Motion Passed 5-0 Respectfully submitted, Bud Talcott, Chairman/ Secretary City Council Date: 9-02'08 REGULAR }ham: 6 Resolution ITEM: Consider adopting apreliminary 2OOQproperty tax levy of$2.O32.130 SUBMITTED BY: Susan Hoyt, City Administrator REVIEWED BY: City Council during budget workshops Joe RiQdon.Finance Consultant Tom Bouthilet, Finance Director SUMMARY AND ACTION REQUESTE[l The city council is being asked to approve a preliminary property tax levy cf $3'332.130tofund aproposed 2OOSgeneral fund operating budget of $2.892.860. This is within the levy limits set for the city and established by the state ofMinnesota. The preliminary property tax levy adopted bythe city council represents that maximum levy permitted. The proposed budget represents a < 1,4% from the 2OU8 amended budget The anticipated property tax impact on homes within the city of Lake Elmo from this levy is compared )nAttachments 1 and2. |nsum, itimexpected that home values increased by1Y6overall and with this increase there will be a small decrease in the city share of property taxes that there will beasmall decrease inproperty taxes in2OO9. The final tax levy and budget are scheduled for a public hearing on December 1. 2008 at on or after PM and adoption of the final levy and budget are planned for December Q.2OO8� SUGGESTED MOTION FOR CDN3IDERAT7OM Move Resolution 20J0'O43adopting apreliminary 20OQtax levy of$2.332,138 SUGGESTED ORDER OFBUSINESS Introduction Susan Hoyt, City Administrator Report Joe R|gdnn.Finance Consultant Questions tnthe presenter Mayor and Council members Questions from the public 1othe Mayor facilitates council, ifany Call for amotion Mayor and Council members Discussion Mayor and Council members Action City Council ATTACHMENTS: 1 Resolution 2OO8—O48 2 Tables with estimated property tax impact from preliminary levy a. City estimate b, County estimate with homestead market value data included 3 General Fund Revenue CITY OF LAKE ELMO WASHINGTON COUNTY, MINNESOTA RESOLUTION NO. 2008-043 A RESOLUTION APPROVING PROPOSED 2008 TAX LEVY, COLLECTIBLE IN 2009 AND THE PROPOSED 2009 BUDGET WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted budget council and committee meetings; WHEREAS, the City is required to adopt a proposed budget for payable 2009 and certified it's proposed property tax levy for payable in 2009. BE IT RESOLVED that the City adopts the proposed 2009 General Fund Budget of $2,892,060. BE IT RESOLVED by the Council of the City of Lake Elmo, County of Washington, Minnesota that the following proposed sums of money be levied for the current year, collectible in 2009, upon taxable property in the City of Lake Elmo, for the following purposes: Total Levy $ 2,332,130 BE IT RESOLVED that the City Clerk is hereby instructed to transmit a certified copy of this resolution to the County Auditor of Washington County, Minnesota. ADOPTED, by the Lake Elmo City Council on the 2nd day of September, 2008. Dean Johnston Mayor ATTEST: Susan Hoyt City Administrator City of LakeBmo 2V0BProposed Property Tax Scenario Residential Homesteads (LEVY LIMIT ESTIMATE) 2008 CITY PROPERTY TAXES Market Tax Value Capacity° 2008 20O8 100'000 1.000 300.000 3.000 500.000 5.000 700.000 7.500 City Local Tax Capacity Rate Pmy2O08 20.539% 20.539% 20�53N% 20.539% City pmpony Taxes 2008 2O09CITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH NOMARKET VALUE |NCREASE\ Market Value Tax 2008 Capacity° NO8VCRfASE 2009 100.000 1.000 380,000 3,000 500^000 5.000 700.008 7.500 City Local Tax Capacity Rate Pay2OO9 20.038% 20.038% 20.038% 20.838% 205 510 1,027 1,540 City Property Taxes 2009 200 081 1,002 1,503 2OVgCITY PROPERTY TAXES (WITH 3% MARKET VALUE INCREASE) Market Value 2000 Tax INCREASE OF Capacity° 3% 2009 ' 103,000 1.030 309.000 3.090 515.000 5.188 City Local Tax Capacity Rate Pey2OOQ 2O-038% 2V.O38`& 20,038% 2V�O38% Property Taxes monemom (5) (15) (25) (3O) Percentage Tax Increase (Decrease) '2.4% -2.4% -2.4% '24% City Property Percentage Property Taxes Tax Taxes |noxaaoo |noreoao 2000 (Decrease) (Davepno) 206 1 V�5% 618 3 0.5Y6 1.840 13 1.2'& 1.556 15 1�0% ~ Tax Capacity rates for residential homesteads are 1,00% of the first $500,000 of market value, plus 125%ofany market value over $50O'DOO Proposed Pay 2009 Property Tax Impact Worksheet Taxing District: STEP 1 - Calculate the Taxing District's Tax Rate: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 112. Item Levy before reduction for state aids State Aids Certifed Property Tax Levy Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy Local Portion of Levy Local Taxable Value "Pay 2009 is a ROUGH ESTIMATE" Local Tax Rate Market Value Referenda Levy Fiscal Disparity Portion of Levy (SDs only) Local Levy Referenda Market Value "Pay 2009 is a ROUGH ESTIMATE" Market Value Referenda Rate 0800 Lake Elmo I Actual Pay 2008 (A) $2,598,000 $0 $2,598,000 $126,138 $2,471,862 12,026,689 20.553% $0 $0 $0 0 0.00000% Proposed Pay 2009 (B) $2,708,203 $0 $2,708,203 $172,381 $2,535,822 12,655,206 20.038% $0 $0 $0 0 0.00000% STEP 2 - Calculate the Impact of the Taxing District's Rate on Residential Homestead Taxes: 13. Assumes a 14. 15. 16. 17. 18, 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26, 27. 28. 29. 30. (D) Taxable Market Value Change 1.0°/0 change in market value from 2008 to 2009, which is the city median change, (E) IF) IG) Taxing Total District MktValue Tax Gross Hstd Capacity Tax Credit 500,00(41.0°A rem @ 1.25% Actual. Pay 2008 (A7 x E) + (Al2 X D) 75,000@.40% - rem@.09% Estimated Tax District rate as % of total rate: 99,000 990 $203.47 $283.30 148,500 247,500 495,000 742,600 Pay 2007 MV X 1.010 1,485 $305.21 2,475 $508.69 4,950 $1,017.37 8,033 $1,651.02 500.000@1.0% rem @ 115% $238.75 $149.65 $0.00 $0.00 Proposed Pay 2009 (B7 x E) + 76,000@ 40% (812 x D) - rem@ 09% Estimated Tax District rate as % of total rate: 100,000 1,000 $200.38 $282.40 150,000 1,500 $300.57 $237.40 250,000 2,500 $500.95 $147.40 500,000 5,000 $1,001.90 $0.00 750,000 8,125 51,628.09 1 $0.00 1.0% 1.0% 1.0% 1,0% 1.0% (I) Taxing Taxing District District share of Net Credit Tax (G) x °/. 30% $84.99 $71.63 $44.90 $0.00 $0.00 (G) x % 30`)/0 $84.72 $71.22 $44.22 $0.00 $0.00 Percentage Change from 2007 to 2008 1.0% -1.5% -0.3% -0.3% -0.6% 0.0% 0.0% -0.6% -1.5a/0 0.0% 0.0% (F) (H) $118.48 $233.58 $463.79 $1,017.37 $1,651.02 (F) - (H) $115.66. $229.35 $456.73 $1,001.90 $1,628.09 -2.4%J -1.5% -1.5% 4.2% 0.0°/o 4.2% 36.7°4 2,6 Vol 5.2%1 -2.5%I o.o%1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2-0 Instructions for Calculating a Residential Homestead Property Tax: D. Taxable Market Value of Residential Homestead Assumes that the Pay 2009 market value changed from Pay 2008 by 1.0%. The maximum increase allowed under the Limited Market Value law inthe greater of: (1)15&increase or(2)5O"&ofthe difference from 2008tu200[. Countywide, the median change intaxable market value from Pay 2000k/Pay 2009ix'110/6. E. Calculate the Net Tax CapmnitvofaResidential Homestead Poy2OOU: 1ot5UO.O00ofMarket Value @1,U0Y6.remainder @125'& Poy28W Iot5OO.000ofMarket Value @ 1.00%. nomaindor@ 125% F. Calculate the taxinqdistrict's Portion ofthe Gross Tax Pay2OOg: multiply the Pay 2008 net tax capacity (E) by the Pay 2008 tax capacity local tax rate (A7), plus multiply the Pay 2U88market value (])hythe Pay 200Omarket value local tax rate (\12) Pay20O8: multiply the Pay 2009 net tax capacity (E) by the Pay 2009 tax capacity local tax rate (B7) , plus multiply the Pay 2009 market value (D) by the Puy 2809 market value local tax rate (612) G. Calculate the total market value homestead credit 0�40%ofthe first 76.8O0o(market value (D) reduced byU.00%onthe market value over 7S.8O0 The credit decreases as the market value nver78.OUO incneu;eu, uo0| a 414.000 home receives O credit. H. Calculate the box nn district's estimated share of market value homestead credit The credit is apportioned to all taxing districts based on their share of the total tax rate. Example of15O.000home : (76.000x.48%=$304) ' (74.000 x 09% = $00,80) = D237'40 Assume the city io30%of the total tax, then the city receives 30%ofthe Credit $237.40 x 30% = $7122 The actual percentage will vary depending on the combination of county, ohy/town, uohoo|, and special taxing disthcts. See sheet "Line 14 data" for actual percentages from Pey2O08. |. Calculate the h»xnudistrict's Portion nfthe Net Tax Gross Tax (F)minus the taxing district's share ofcredit (H) 26-30. Calculate the %inoneosokdocvoosofrom 2OO8to2O0e (2080-2008)/2808 o.. City of Lake Elmo General Fund Budget 2009 2008 2008 2009 2008 2007 2007 Amended Yeareto-Date Preliminary to 2009 Account Number Description Budget Actual Budget (07/151091 Budget Change 101 General Fund Revenues and Transfers In 000 General 0000 General 101-000-0000-31010 Current Ad Valorem Taxes $2,428,600.00 $1,868,889,04 $2,221,486.00 $0.00 52,332.130.00 101-00D-0000-31020 Delinquent Ad Valorem Taxes $0.00 $0.00 C 150 NIAN°C/:A:0 101-000-0000-31030 Mobile Horne Tax $23,459.40 $0.00 s$00.0000 $8,336.44 $0.00 $8,000.00 101-000-0000-31040 Fiscal Disparities $112,613.00 $106,232.34 $0.00 $8,00$00:0000 101-000-0000-31910 Penalty & interest on Taxes $0.00 $0.00 N/A 101-000-0000-32110 Liquor License $7,2001°00° $1,759.06 57,200.00 $1,100.00 $0.00 $ 4 00004$C)0'. 03$7$,520000.0000 0.0% 101-000-000-32180 Wastehauler License $420.00 $175.00 $7,200.00 $710.00 - 2,50 ,05://: 101-000-0000-32181 General Contractor License $2$,06°0°0 TO $800.00 $1,500.00 101-C,00-0000-32183 Heating Contractor License $2,280.50 $7$9606:00o0 $1,500.00 MOOD 0,0% 101-000-0000-32184 Blacktopping Contractor License $1,280.0o 101-000-0000-322t0 Buiioing Permits $522,068,00 $6000 5201,158.25 $200,1050°01°0°0 $7:8694$00ii.700009 $140,000.00 -30,0% 101-000-0000-32215 Surcharge $22,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 NIA -59.1% 101-000-0000-32220 Heating Permits $15,000.00 $379.10 $0.00 $11,030.00 $4,500.00 ..59,1% 101-000-0000-32230 Plumbing Pemlits $11.000.00 $10,681.00 $3,110.00 $9,059.00 $11,000.00 $3,250.00 04,500.00 101-000-0000-32231 Sewer Permits 32,000,00 $s11,71„0000 -25.0% $15,000.00 $1,500.00 $3,025.00 101-000-0000-32240 Animal License $1,500.00 101-000-0000-32250 Utility Permits 06,000.00 $2,371.00 FL,254370.D500 $$26:000000:0000 $24:°0300.'C/300 -16.7% 101-000-000032260 Burning Permit $1,692.00 $1,000.00 '3 °34° 1 . NIA 101-000-0000-33401 Local Government Aid $1,000.00 30.00 $1,200.00 $805,00 $0.00 $0.00 101-000-0000-33402 Homestead Credit Aid $0.00 30.00 $40,39$0..°6°1 $23,610,00 $67,275.00 0.0% 101-000-0000-33418 MSA - Maintenance $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 $33,637,50 .i.N8/7A0 101-000-0000-33420 State Fire Aid $52,00$0°.0(j°0 348,005.00 $67,275.00 $$7,344.00 $60,000.00 $2,750.00 101-000-0000-33422 PERA Aid $2,749.00 101-000-0000-33426 Miscellaneous State Grants $2,749.00 $2,750.00 $0.00$0.00 $8,014.0o$$00:00g 101-000-0000-33620 Grave{ Tax $0.00 '$3,021.54 0735.00 $3,253.00 $2,500.00 101-000-0000-33621 Recycling Grant $15,270.00 $15,570.00$3,250.00 $15,o0o.00 ill% 015,270,00 $2,457,63 101-000-0000-33622 Cable Franchise Revenue $29,910.00$27.000.0 $31,579.82 $30,000,00 -84.0% 101-000-0000-34103 Zoning & Subdivision Fees $15,000.00 026,681.37 $19,955.00 $4,000.00 -47,8% 101-000-0000-34104 Plan Check Fees $334,350.00 $25,000.00 101-000-0000-34105 Sale of Copies, Books, Maps $685,619252.,0701 $86,160,00 $1,770'.°00 $24,654,00 $45,000.00 $$31a5°0'.°0°0 0.0% $300.00 $85.55 -216°0 'St.)70:9;‘, $1,500.00 $150.00 $3$,83352'.°50° 101-000-0000-34107 Assessment Searches $440,46 101-000-0000-34109 Clean Up Days $100,00 $780.00 $5,124.5o 101,0o0-0000,.34111 Cable Operation Reimbursement $6,0o0.0o $5,000.0o $2,0oo,00 $1,729.76 $2,003.03 S2,400,00 $52,000.00 -- 21 830 -.. :1 '//:o 101-000-0000-35100 Fines $65,000.00$65,000.00 057,652.34 $617.60 $18,000 00 101-000-0000-36200 Miscellaneous Revenue $29,549.49 $14.0oo.00 $21,973.00 101-000-0000-36210 Interest Earnings $23,204.21 $92,858.58 $5,583.33 $70,000.00 $80,000,00 101-000-0000-36230 Donations $0.00 $80,030.00 $0 30 NIA 101-000-0000-39200 interfund Operating Transfers 5200.000.00 $9,000.00 00.00 $0.00 $8,500.00 50 00 N/A 0000 General $0.00 $0.00 $3,956,306.00 $2,694,651.71 $2,,32,78.o$10.000 3231,367.21 02.892,050.00 000 General $3,956,308,00 $2,694,851.71 $2,932,718.00 $231,357,21 $2.502,060.00 -1.45.. Revenues and Transfers In $3,956,308.00 $2,694,851.71 $2,932,718.00 $231,387.21 $2,892,060.00 -1.4°/‘. Revenues by Type Taxes/Franchise Fees $2,574,376.00 $2,038,379.19 $2,259,736.00 $34,037,45 $2,372,630.00 5.0% Licenses and Permits $937,313.00 $315,974,06 $329,920.00 $111,953.79 $212,555.00 -35.6% Intergovernmental $70,019.00 $130,338.61 $142,639.00 $34,372.50 $145,025.00 1.7% Charges for Services $25,600.00 $27,444.72 $33,450,00 $6,370.65 $11,650.00 -64.65 Fines $65,000,00 $57,652,34 $65,000.00 $26,549.49 $52,000.00 -20.0% Other 384,000.00 $125,062,79 $101,973.00 $18,083.33 $98,000.00 -3.0% Transfers fn $200,000.00 $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0 03 NSA $3,956,309.00 32.694.851.71 32,912,718.00 $221,367.21 02,892,060.00 -1.4% City of Lake Elmo General Fund Budget 2009 Account Number 2008 2008 2009 2008 2007 2007 Amended Year -to -Date Preliminary to 2009 Description Budget Actual Buciget f07/15/081 Budget Change Expenditures and Transfers Out 410 General Government 1110 Mavor & Council Personnel Services $17,099,00 $17,092.60 $17,098,00 $8,846.13 $17,692.00 3.5% Other Services and Charges $25.200.00 $13,322.68 $26,200.00 $7,425.60 $15,300.00 -37.8%r 1110 Mayor & Council $43.298,00 930,415.05 $43,298.00 $16,271.73 $33,992.00 -21.5% 1320 Administration Personnel Services $202,413.00 $170,468.28 $348,432.00 $168,719.52 $292,342.00 .16.1°/s Supplies $11,400.00 $6,780.94 $11,500,00 $3,519,86 911,000,00 -4.3% Other Services and Charges $209.856.00 $141.329.39 $167,075.00 $09.437.41 $165,850.00 -11.3% 1320 Administration $423,669,00 $318,598.60 $547,007.00 $261,676.79 $469,192.00 -14,2% 1410 Elections Personnel Services $4,091.00 $3,290.50 $9,774.00 $0,00 $000 -100.0% Supplies $150.00 $0.00 $900.00 $0.00 $0.00 -100.0% Other Se/vices and Charges $200.00 $972.23 $400,00 $0,00 $1,000,00 . 150.0% Capital Outlay $1,000 00 $0.00 $5,940.00 $940,00 $0,00 -100.0% 1410 Elections $5,441.00 $4,262.73 $17,014.00 $940.00 $1,000.00 -94.1% 1450 Communications Personnel Services $0.03 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 $16,864.00 N/A Other Services and Charges $0.00 MOO $0.00 $0.00 $39,500.00 NIA 1450 Communications $0.00 $0.00 $0 00 $0,00 ' $56,364.00 N/A 1520/1530 Finance and Accounting Services Personnel Services $93,502.00 $68,421,51 $59,041.00 $30,637.35 $45,571,00 -48.8% Supplies $3,400.00 $1,165,88 $2,000.00 $694.96 $1,500.00 -25.0% Other Services and Charges $68,000.09 $47,016.46 $66,550.00 $62,235.75 $61,050.00 -8.3% 152.0/1530 Finance and Accounting Services $164.902.00 $116,605,85 $157,591.00 $93,568.05 $108,121,00 -31.4% 1910 Plannina & Zoning Personnel Services $177,027.00 $126,528.02 $152,253.00 $69,101.19 $156,707.00 4,2% Supplies $2,500.00 $2,278.63 $3,000.00 9422.77 $2,750.00 -6.3% Other Services and Charges $22,900.00 $142.155.00 $59,250,00 $31,224,19 $41,200,00 -30.5% 1910 Planning & Zoning $202,427.00 $270,961,85 $214,503.00 $100,748.15 $202,657,00 -6.5% 1930 Engineering Services Other Services and Charges $45,000.00 $116,003.20 $94,000 00 $48,014,63 $68,000.00 -27.7% 1930 Engineering Services $45,000.00 $116,003.20 $94,000.00 $45,014.63 $68,000.00 -27.75'n 1940 City Hall Supplies $1,550.00 $818.05 $1.550,00 $651.76 $1,550,00 0,209 Other Services and Charges $36,975.00 S32,071.91 $38,975.00 $19,525.72 $39,393.00 1.1% 1940 City Hall 836,525.00 $32,890 86 $40,525.00 $20,177,48 $40,943.00 1.0% 410. General Government 5923,202.00 5989,735.37 $1,113,938.00 $541,396.84 $980,269.00 -12.0% 2 City of Lake Elmo General Fund Budget 2009 2008 2008 2009 2008 2007 2007 Amended Year-toi-Date Preliminary to 2009 Account Number Description Budget Actual Budget (07115/08) Budget Change 420 Public Safety 2100 Police Other Services and Charges $385,000.00 $408,773,86 $431,000.00 $0.00 $466.950,00 2100 Police $385,000,00 $406,773.86 $431,000,00 $0,00 $466,950.00 215D Prosecution Other Services and Charges $58,006.00 $52.391.61 $58,000.60 $22,789.79 $55,000.00 2150 Prosecution $58,000.00 $52,391,61 $58,000.00 $22,789.79 $55,000.00 2220 ELL-e 6.3%. 6.3% -5.2% Personnel Services $262,697.00 $241,272.20 $256,192.00 $83.580,74 $223,449.00 -12.8% Supplies $18,750,00 $20,844.04 518,600.00 $10,665.10 $29,220,00 57.1% Other Services and Charges $138,225.00 $104,486.66 $131,066.00 $67,710.38 $138,261.00 5.5% Capital Outlay $10,000.00 $7,762.11 $10,000.00 $2,639.61 $0,00 -100.0% 2220 Fire 5429,672.00 5374.365.01 $415,858.00 $164,795,83 5390,939.36 -6.9% 2250 Fire Relief Other Services and Charges $52,000.00 $48.005.00 $57,344.00 $0.03 $60,000.80 4.6%, 2250 Fire Relief $52,000.00 $48,005,00 $57,344,00 $0.00 $60,000.00 4.6% 2400 Building Inspection Personnel Services $245,835.00 $140,496.30 $104,121.00 $44,636.52 $163,880.00 57.4% Supplies $6,650.00 0762.38 $4,750.00 $371.49 $4,750.00 0.0% Other Services and Charges $50,365.00 $9,544.61 $21,585.00 $4,427.36 $19,950.00 Capital Outlay $1,850.00 $0.00 $1,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 -100.0%. 2400 Building Inspection $304,720.00 $150,603.29 $131,456.00 S49,435.37 $188,580.00 43.5% 260D Code Enforcement * Personnel Services $58,215.00 $6.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N/A Supplies $7,300.00 50.00 50.00 $0.00 $0 00 NIA Other Services and Charges $7,280.00 $9.90 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N/A Capital Outlay $250.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 $0,00 N/A 2600 Code Enforcement $73,045.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 50.00 N/A • Departinent not established 2700 Animal Control Supplies $150.00 $0.00 $150.00 $0.00 $150.0C 0.0% Other Services and Charges $16,100.00 $9,902.30 512,100.00 $5,263.78 $12,700.00 5.05 270D Animal Control $16.250.00 $9.902.30 $12,250.00 $6,263.78 $12,850.00 4.9% 2800 Engineering Personnel Services $60,789.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 N/A Supplies $6,950.00 50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.30 N/A Other Services and Charges $2.800.00 $3.06 $0.00 $0.00 $0,00 N/A 2800 Engineering $70.519,00 $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 NIA " Department not established 420 Public Safety 51,389,206.00 $1,044,241.07 $1,105,908.00 $243,284.77 $1,174,310.00 6.2% D City of Lake Elmo General Fund Budget 2009 2007 Account Number Description Budget 430 Public Works 3100 Pubtic Works 2008 2008 2009 2008 2007 Amended Year.to-Date Preliminary to 2009 Actual Budget (07/15108) Budget Change Personnel Services $205,737.00 $135,695.25 $220,190.00 $99,681.37 $216,013,00 -1.9% Supplies $102,435.00 $112,556.24 $106,500,00 $47,549.95 $5,505.00 -91,1% Other Services and Charges $173,650.00 $119.501.09 $152,238,00 $49,973.78 $99,465,00 -34.7°/0 Capital Outlay $13,000.00 $2,021.87 $10,000.00 $4,566.72 $0.00 -100.0%, 3100 Public Works $494,825.05 $370,084.45 $488,928.00 $201,771.82 $324,975.00 -33.514, 3120 Streets Supplies $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0.00 $60,860.00 N/A 01her Services and Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $18,000.00 N/A 3120 Streets $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $000 $75,860.00 N/A, 3125 Ice and Snow Removal Supplies $0.00 $0,00 $0.00 $0,00 $51,000,00 N/A Other Services and Charges $0.00 $0 00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,500.00 N/A, 3125 lce and Snow Removal $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $63,500,00 NIA 3160 Street Lighting Other Services and Charges $25,000,33 $22,764.62 $25,000,00 $11,260.44 $24,000.00 -4.0% 3160 Street Lighting $25,000,00 $22,764.62 $25,000.00 $11,260.44 $24,000.00 -4.0%, 3200 Recycling Supplies $6,000,00 $2,739.75 $6,000,30 $547.50 $3,500.00 -41.7% Other Services and Charges $10.000.00 $10,000.00 $9,000.00 $412.16 $11,500.00 27.8% , 3200 Recycling $16.000.00 $12,739.75 $15,000.00 $959.66 $15,000.00 0.0%, 3250 Tree Program Other Services and Charges $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,000.00 N/A, 3250 Tree Program SO 00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $14,303.30 NIA 430 Public Works 0535.825 00 $405.585.82 $528,928.00 $213,891 92 $520,338.00 -1.6% 4 City of Lake Elmo General Fund Budget 2009 2008 MS 2009 2008 2007 2007 Amended Year -to -Date Preliminary to 2009 Account Number Description Budget Actual Budget I07/15/08) Budget Change 450 Culture. Recreation 5200 Parks & Recreation Personnel Services $131,896,00 $119,416,85 5141,911.00 $60,413.87 $172,379.00 21.5% Supplies $18,150.00 $7,483.26 $12,150.00 51,181.45 $12,050,00 -0.8% Other Services and Charges $34,120,00 $34,039,31 $29,883.00 $15,951,87 $32,714.00 9,5% 5200 Parks & Recreation $184,175.00 $160,939.42 $183,944.0D $77,547,20 $217,143 00 450 Culture, Recreation $184,175.00 $160,939.42 $183,944.00 $77.547,20 $217,143.00 Transfers Out $695,646.00 $156,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 18.0% 18.0%, N/A Expenditures and Transfers Out $3,928,106.00 $2,656,507.68 $2,932,718.00 $1,076,220.73 $2,892060,00 -1.4%, 101 General Fund $28,200.00 $38,344,03 $0.00 -$844,853.52 $0.08 Nip, Expenditures by Type Personnel Services $1,459,280.00 $1,022,701.51 $1,339,012.00 5565.616,69 $1,306,897,00 -2.4% Supplies 5165„308.00 $165,740.27 5167,10080 $65,664,85 $187,830.00 12.4% Other Services and Charges $1,361,700.00 $1,312,281.92 $1,399,666.00 $136,652.86 $1,397,333.00 -0.2% Capital Outlay $26,100.00 $9,783.98 $26,940.00 $8,346.33 $0.00 -100,0% Transfers Out 5895,640.0a $156,000.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 NIA $3,928,108,00 $2,655,507.68 52,930, $1,076,220.73 $2,892,060.00 -1.404